Hubbry Logo
MongolsMongolsMain
Open search
Mongols
Community hub
Mongols
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mongols
Mongols
from Wikipedia

Mongols[a] are an East Asian ethnic group native to Mongolia and China (Inner Mongolia and other 11 autonomous territories), as well as the republics of Buryatia and Kalmykia in Russia. The Mongols are the principal member of the large family of Mongolic peoples. The Oirats and the Buryats are classified either as distinct ethno-linguistic groups or as subgroups of Mongols.

Key Information

The Mongols are bound together by a common heritage and ethnic identity, descending from the Proto-Mongols. Their indigenous dialects are collectively known as the Mongolian language. The contiguous geographical area in which the Mongols primarily live is referred to as the Mongol heartland, especially in discussions of the Mongols' history under the Mongol Empire.

Definition

[edit]

Broadly defined, the term includes the Mongols proper (also known as the Khalkha Mongols), Buryats, Oirats, the Kalmyks and the Southern Mongols. The latter comprises the Abaga Mongols, Abaganar, Aohans, Arkhorchin, Asud, Baarins, Chahars, Darkhan (Shar Darkhad), Dörvön Khüükhed, Eastern Dorbets, Gorlos Mongols, Ikhmyangan, Jalaids, Jaruud, Kharchins, Khishigten, Khorchins, Khuuchid, Muumyangan, Naimans, Onnigud, Ordos, Sunud, Tumed, Urad and Üzemchins.[16]

The designation "Mongol" briefly appeared in 8th century records of Tang China to describe a tribe of Shiwei. It resurfaced in the late 11th century during the Khitan-ruled Liao dynasty. After the fall of the Liao in 1125, the Khamag Mongols became a leading tribe on the Mongolian Plateau. However, their wars with the Jurchen-ruled Jin dynasty and the Tatar confederation had weakened them.

In the thirteenth century, the word Mongol grew into an umbrella term for a large group of Mongolic-speaking tribes united under the rule of Genghis Khan.[17]

Etymology

[edit]

There are several proposals for the ethnonym Mongol's etymology:

History

[edit]
Asia in 330–555, showing the Rouran Khaganate and its neighbors, including the Tuoba Wei and the Tuyuhun, all of which were established by Proto-Mongols

The ethnogenesis of Mongolic peoples is largely linked with the expansion of Ancient Northeast Asians. The Mongolian pastoralist lifestyle may in part be derived from the Western Steppe Herders, but without much geneflow between these two groups, suggesting cultural transmission.[20][21]

In various times Mongolic peoples have been equated with the Scythians, the Magog, and the Tungusic peoples. Based on Chinese historical texts the ancestry of the Mongolic peoples can be traced back to the Donghu, a nomadic confederation occupying eastern Mongolia and Manchuria. The Donghu neighboured the Xiongnu, whose identity is still debated today. Although some scholars maintain that they were proto-Mongols, they were more likely a multi-ethnic group of Mongolic and Turkic tribes.[22][full citation needed] It has been suggested that the language of the Huns was related to the Xiongnu.[23]

The Donghu, however, can be much more easily labeled proto-Mongol since the Chinese histories trace only Mongolic tribes and kingdoms (Xianbei and Wuhuan peoples) from them, although some historical texts claim a mixed Xiongnu-Donghu ancestry for some tribes (e.g. the Khitan).[24][25]

In the Chinese classics

[edit]
Yuan dynasty Mongol rider

The Donghu are mentioned by Sima Qian as already existing in Inner Mongolia north of Yan in 699–632 BCE along with the Shanrong. Unofficial Chinese sources such as Yi Zhou Shu ("Lost Book of Zhou")[26] and the Classic of Mountains and Seas[27] project the Donghu's activities back to the Shang dynasty (1600–1046 BCE). However, the Hu (胡) were not mentioned among the non-Shang fang (方 "border-region"; modern term fāngguó 方國 "fang-countries") in the extant oracle bones from the Shang period.[28]

The Xianbei formed part of the Donghu confederation, and possibly had in earlier times some independence within the Donghu confederation as well as from the Zhou dynasty. During the Warring States the poem "The Great Summons" (Chinese: 大招; pinyin: Dà zhāo) in the anthology Verses of Chu mentions small-waisted and long-necked Xianbei women,[29] and possibly also the book Discourses of the States, which states that during the reign of King Cheng of Zhou (reigned 1042–1021 BCE) the Xianbei came to participate at a meeting of Zhou subject-lords at Qiyang (岐阳) (now Qishan County) but were only allowed to perform the fire ceremony under the supervision of Chu since they were not vassals (诸侯) by enfeoffment and establishment. The Xianbei chieftain was appointed joint guardian of the ritual torch along with Chu viscount Xiong Yi.[30][31][b]

These early Xianbei came from the nearby Zhukaigou culture (2200–1500 BCE) in the Ordos Desert, where maternal DNA corresponds to the Mongol Daur people and the Tungusic Evenks. The Zhukaigou Xianbei (part of the Ordos culture of Inner Mongolia and northern Shaanxi) had trade relations with the Shang. Liu Song dynasty commentator Pei Yin (裴駰), in his Jixie (集解), quoted Eastern Han dynasty scholar Fu Qian (服虔)'s assertion that Shanrong (山戎) and Beidi (北狄) are ancestors of the present-day Xianbei (鮮卑).[45][46] Again in Inner Mongolia another closely connected core Mongolic Xianbei region was the Upper Xiajiadian culture (1000–600 BCE) where the Donghu confederation was centered.

After the Donghu were defeated by Xiongnu king Modu Chanyu, the Xianbei and Wuhuan survived as the main remnants of the confederation. Tadun Khan of the Wuhuan (died 207 AD) was the ancestor of the proto-Mongolic Kumo Xi.[47] The Wuhuan are of the direct Donghu royal line and the New Book of Tang says that in 209 BCE, Modu Chanyu defeated the Wuhuan instead of using the word Donghu. The Xianbei, however, were of the lateral Donghu line and had a somewhat separate identity, although they shared the same language with the Wuhuan. In 49 CE the Xianbei ruler Bianhe (Bayan Khan?) raided and defeated the Xiongnu, killing 2000, after having received generous gifts from Emperor Guangwu of Han. The Xianbei reached their peak under Tanshihuai (reigned 156–181) who expanded their vast but short lived confederation.

Analysis of DNA extracted from the remains of Avars found in Hungary has provided evidence that they originated in what is now Mongolia.[48]

Three prominent groups split from the Xianbei state as recorded by the Chinese histories: the Rouran (claimed by some to be the Pannonian Avars), the Khitan people and the Shiwei (a subtribe called the "Shiwei Menggu" is held to be the origin of the Genghisid Mongols).[49] Besides these three Xianbei groups, there were others such as the Murong, Duan and Tuoba. Their culture was nomadic, their religion shamanism or Buddhism and their military strength formidable. There is still no direct evidence that the Rouran spoke Mongolic languages, although most scholars agree that they were Proto-Mongolic.[50] The Khitan, however, had two scripts of their own and many Mongolic words are found in their half-deciphered writings.

Geographically, the Tuoba Xianbei ruled the southern part of Inner Mongolia and northern China, the Rouran (Yujiulü Shelun was the first to use the title khagan in 402) ruled eastern Mongolia, western Mongolia, the northern part of Inner Mongolia and northern Mongolia, the Khitan were concentrated in eastern part of Inner Mongolia north of Korea and the Shiwei were located to the north of the Khitan. These tribes and kingdoms were soon overshadowed by the rise of the First Turkic Khaganate in 555, the Uyghur Khaganate in 745 and the Yenisei Kirghiz states in 840. The Tuoba were eventually absorbed into China. The Rouran fled west from the Göktürks and either disappeared into obscurity or, as some say, invaded Europe as the Avars under their Khan, Bayan I. Some Rouran under Tatar Khan migrated east, founding the Tatar confederation, who became part of the Shiwei. The Khitans, who were independent after their separation from the Kumo Xi (of Wuhuan origin) in 388, continued as a minor power in Manchuria until one of them, Abaoji (872–926), established the Liao dynasty (916–1125).

Mongol Empire

[edit]
A portrait of Kublai Khan by Araniko (1245–1306)
Mongol huntsmen, Ming dynasty

The destruction of the Uyghur Khaganate by the Kirghiz resulted in the end of Turkic dominance in Mongolia. According to historians, Kirghiz were not interested in assimilating newly acquired lands; instead, they controlled local tribes through various manaps (tribal leaders). The Khitans occupied the areas vacated by the Turkic Uyghurs bringing them under their control. The Yenisei Kirghiz state was centered on Khakassia and they were expelled from Mongolia by the Khitans in 924. Beginning in the 10th century, the Khitans, under the leadership of Abaoji, prevailed in several military campaigns against the Tang dynasty's border guards, and the Xi, Shiwei and Jurchen nomadic groups.[51]

Remnants of the Liao dynasty led by Yelü Dashi fled west through Mongolia after being defeated by the Jurchen-led Jin dynasty and founded the Qara Khitai (Western Liao dynasty) in 1124 while still maintaining control over western Mongolia. In 1218, Genghis Khan incorporated the Qara Khitai after which the Khitan passed into obscurity. Some remnants surfaced as the Qutlugh-Khanid dynasty (1222–1306) in Iran and the Dai Khitai in Afghanistan. With the expansion of the Mongol Empire, the Mongolic peoples settled over almost all Eurasia and carried on military campaigns from the Adriatic Sea to Indonesian Java and from Japan to Palestine. They simultaneously became Padishahs of Persia, Emperors of China, and Great Khans of the Mongols, and one (Al-Adil Kitbugha) became Sultan of Egypt. The Mongolic peoples of the Golden Horde established themselves to govern Russia by 1240.[52] By 1279, they conquered the Song dynasty and brought all of China proper under the control of the Yuan dynasty.[52]

... from Chinggis up high down to the common people, all are shaven in the style pojiao. As with small boys in China, they leave three locks, one hanging from the crown of their heads. When it has grown some, they clip it; the strands lower on both sides they plait to hang down on the shoulders.[53]

— Zhao Gong

With the breakup of the empire, the dispersed Mongolic peoples quickly adopted the mostly Turkic cultures surrounding them and were assimilated, forming parts of Afghanistan's Hazaras, Azerbaijanis, Uzbeks, Karakalpaks, Tatars, Bashkirs, Turkmens, Uyghurs, Nogais, Kyrgyzs, Kazakhs, Caucasus peoples, Iranian peoples and Moghuls; linguistic and cultural Persianization also began to be prominent in these territories. Some Mongols assimilated into the Yakuts after their migration to northern Siberia and about 30% of Yakut words have Mongol origin. However, remnants of the Yuan imperial family retreated north to Mongolia in 1368, retaining their language and culture. There were 250,000 Mongols in southern China and many Mongols were massacred by the rebel army. The survivors were trapped in southern China and eventually assimilated. The Dongxiangs, Bonans, Yugur and Monguor people were invaded by the Ming dynasty.

Northern Yuan

[edit]
The Northern Yuan dynasty and Turco-Mongol residual states and domains by the 15th century

After the fall of the Yuan dynasty in 1368, the Mongols continued to rule the Northern Yuan in northern China and the Mongolian steppe. However, the Oirads began to challenge the Eastern Mongols under the Borjigin monarchs in the late 14th century and Mongolia was divided into two parts: Western Mongolia (Oirats) and Eastern Mongolia (Khalkha, Inner Mongols, Barga, Buryats). The earliest written references to the plough in Middle Mongol language sources appear towards the end of the 14th c.[54]

In 1434, Eastern Mongol Taisun Khan's (1433–1452) Oirat prime minister Togoon Taish reunited the Mongols after killing Adai Khan in Ejin. Togoon died in 1439 and his son Esen Taish became ruler of Northern Yuan dynasty. Esen later unified the Mongol tribes. The Ming dynasty attempted to invade the Northern Yuan in the 14–16th centuries, however, the Ming dynasty was defeated by the Oirat, Southern Mongol, Eastern Mongol and united Mongol armies. Esen's 30,000 cavalries defeated 500,000 Chinese soldiers in the 1449 Tumu Crisis. Within eighteen months of his defeat of the titular Khan Taisun, in 1453, Esen himself took the title of Great Khan (1454–1455) of the Great Yuan.[55]

The Khalkha emerged during the reign of Dayan Khan (1479–1543) as one of the six tumens of the Eastern Mongolic peoples. They quickly became the dominant Mongolic clan in Mongolia proper.[56][57] He reunited the Mongols again. In 1550, Altan Khan led a Tumed Mongol raid on Beijing. The Mongols voluntarily reunified during Eastern Mongolian Tümen Zasagt Khan rule (1558–1592) for the last time (the Mongol Empire united all Mongols before this).

Eastern Mongolia was divided into three parts in the 17th century: Outer Mongolia (Khalkha), Inner Mongolia (Inner Mongols) and the Buryat region in southern Siberia.

The last Mongol khagan was Ligdan in the early 17th century. He got into conflicts with the Manchus over the looting of Chinese cities, and managed to alienate most Mongol tribes. In 1618, Ligdan signed a treaty with the Ming dynasty to protect their northern border from the Manchus attack in exchange for thousands of taels of silver. By the 1620s, only the Chahars remained under his rule.

Qing era

[edit]
Map showing wars between Qing dynasty and Dzungar Khanate
A Dzungar soldier called Ayusi from the high Qing era, by Giuseppe Castiglione, 1755
The Battle of Oroi-Jalatu in 1755 between the Qing (that ruled China at the time) and Mongol Dzungar armies. The fall of the Dzungar Khanate

The Chahar army was defeated in 1625 and 1628 by the Inner Mongol and Manchu armies due to Ligdan's faulty tactics. The Qing forces secured their control over Inner Mongolia by 1635, and the army of the last khan Ligdan moved to battle against Tibetan Gelugpa sect (Yellow Hat sect) forces. The Gelugpa forces supported the Manchus, while Ligdan supported Kagyu sect (Red Hat sect) of Tibetan Buddhism. Ligden died in 1634 on his way to Tibet. By 1636, most Inner Mongolian nobles had submitted to the Qing dynasty founded by the Manchus. Inner Mongolian Tengis noyan revolted against the Qing in the 1640s and the Khalkha battled to protect Sunud.

Western Mongol Oirats and Eastern Mongolian Khalkhas vied for domination in Mongolia since the 15th century and this conflict weakened Mongol strength. In 1688, the Western Mongol Dzungar Khanate's king Galdan Boshugtu attacked Khalkha after murder of his younger brother by Tusheet Khan Chakhundorj (main or Central Khalkha leader) and the Khalkha-Oirat War began. Galdan threatened to kill Chakhundorj and Zanabazar (Javzandamba Khutagt I, spiritual head of Khalkha) but they escaped to Sunud (Inner Mongolia). Many Khalkha nobles and folks fled to Inner Mongolia because of the war. Few Khalkhas fled to the Buryat region and Russia threatened to exterminate them if they did not submit, but many of them submitted to Galdan Boshugtu.

In 1683 Galdan's armies reached Tashkent and the Syr Darya and crushed two armies of the Kazakhs. After that Galdan subjugated the Black Khirgizs and ravaged the Fergana Valley. From 1685 Galdan's forces aggressively pushed the Kazakhs. While his general Rabtan took Taraz, and his main force forced the Kazakhs to migrate westwards.[58] In 1687, he besieged the City of Turkistan. Under the leadership of Abul Khair Khan, the Kazakhs won major victories over the Dzungars at the Bulanty River in 1726, and at the Battle of Anrakay in 1729.[59]

The Khalkha eventually submitted to Qing rule in 1691 by Zanabazar's decision, thus bringing all of today's Mongolia under the rule of the Qing dynasty but Khalkha de facto remained under the rule of Galdan Boshugtu Khaan until 1696. The Mongol-Oirat's Code (a treaty of alliance) against foreign invasion between the Oirats and Khalkhas was signed in 1640, however, the Mongols could not unite against foreign invasions. Chakhundorj fought against Russian invasion of Outer Mongolia until 1688 and stopped Russian invasion of Khövsgöl Province. Zanabazar struggled to bring together the Oirats and Khalkhas before the war.

Galdan Boshugtu sent his army to "liberate" Inner Mongolia after defeating the Khalkha's army and called Inner Mongolian nobles to fight for Mongolian independence. Some Inner Mongolian nobles, Tibetans, Kumul Khanate and some Moghulistan's nobles supported his war against the Manchus, however, Inner Mongolian nobles did not battle against the Qing.

There were three khans in Khalkha and Zasagt Khan Shar (Western Khalkha leader) was Galdan's ally. Tsetsen Khan (Eastern Khalkha leader) did not engage in this conflict. While Galdan was fighting in Eastern Mongolia, his nephew Tseveenravdan seized the Dzungarian throne in 1689 and this event made Galdan impossible to fight against the Qing Empire. The Russian and Qing Empires supported his action because this coup weakened Western Mongolian strength. Galdan Boshugtu's army was defeated by the outnumbering Qing army in 1696 and he died in 1697. The Mongols who fled to the Buryat region and Inner Mongolia returned after the war. Some Khalkhas mixed with the Buryats.

The Buryats fought against Russian invasion since the 1620s and thousands of Buryats were massacred. The Buryat region was formally annexed to Russia by treaties in 1689 and 1727, when the territories on both the sides of Lake Baikal were separated from Mongolia. In 1689 the Treaty of Nerchinsk established the northern border of Manchuria north of the present line. The Russians retained Trans-Baikalia between Lake Baikal and the Argun River north of Mongolia. The Treaty of Kyakhta (1727), along with the Treaty of Nerchinsk, regulated the relations between Russian and Qing empires until the mid-nineteenth century, and established the Mongolia-Russia border. Oka Buryats revolted in 1767 and Russia completely conquered the Buryat region in the late 18th century. Russia and Qing were rival empires until the early 20th century, however, both empires carried out united policy against Central Asians.

The Qing Empire conquered Upper Mongolia or the Oirat's Khoshut Khanate in the 1720s and 80,000 people were killed.[60] By that period, Upper Mongolian population reached 200,000. The Dzungar Khanate conquered by the Qing dynasty in 1755–1758 because of their leaders and military commanders conflicts. Some scholars estimate that about 80% of the Dzungar population were destroyed by a combination of warfare and disease during the Qing conquest of the Dzungar Khanate in 1755–1758.[61] Mark Levene, a historian whose recent research interests focus on genocide,[62] has stated that the extermination of the Dzungars was "arguably the eighteenth century genocide par excellence."[63] The Dzungar population reached 600,000 in 1755.

About 200,000–250,000 Oirats migrated from western Mongolia to Volga River in 1607 and established the Kalmyk Khanate.The Torghuts were led by their Tayishi, Kho Orluk. Russia was concerned about their attack but the Kalmyks became a Russian ally and a treaty to protect the southern Russian border was signed between the Kalmyk Khanate and Russia. In 1724 the Kalmyks came under control of Russia. By the early 18th century, there were approximately 300,000–350,000 Kalmyks and 15,000,000 Russians.[citation needed] The Tsardom of Russia gradually chipped away at the autonomy of the Kalmyk Khanate. These policies, for instance, encouraged the establishment of Russian and German settlements on pastures the Kalmyks used to roam and feed their livestock. In addition, the Tsarist government imposed a council on the Kalmyk Khan, thereby diluting his authority, while continuing to expect the Kalmyk Khan to provide cavalry units to fight on behalf of Russia. The Russian Orthodox church, by contrast, pressured Buddhist Kalmyks to adopt Orthodoxy. In January 1771, approximately 200,000 (170,000)[64] Kalmyks began the migration from their pastures on the left bank of the Volga to Dzungaria, through the territories of their Bashkir and Kazakh enemies. The last Kalmyk khan Ubashi led the migration to restore Mongolian independence. Ubashi Khan sent his 30,000 cavalries to the Russo-Turkish War (1768–74) to gain weapon before the migration. The Empress Catherine the Great ordered the Russian army, Bashkirs and Kazakhs to exterminate all migrants and the Empress abolished the Kalmyk Khanate.[64][65][66][67][68] The Kyrgyzs attacked them near Balkhash Lake. About 100,000–150,000 Kalmyks who settled on the west bank of the Volga River could not cross the river because the river did not freeze in the winter of 1771 and Catherine the Great executed influential nobles of them. After seven months of travel, only one-third (66,073)[64] of the original group reached Dzungaria (Balkhash Lake, western border of the Qing Empire).[69] The Qing Empire transmigrated the Kalmyks to five different areas to prevent their revolt and influential leaders of the Kalmyks died soon (killed by the Manchus). Russia states that Buryatia voluntarily merged with Russia in 1659 due to Mongolian oppression and the Kalmyks voluntarily accepted Russian rule in 1609 but only Georgia voluntarily accepted Russian rule.[70][71]

In the early 20th century, the late Qing government encouraged Han Chinese settlement of Mongolian lands under the name of "New Policies" or "New Administration" (xinzheng). As a result, some Mongol leaders, especially those of Outer Mongolia, decided to seek Mongolian independence. After the Xinhai Revolution, the Mongolian Revolution on 30 November 1911 in Outer Mongolia ended an over 200-year rule of the Qing dynasty.

Post-Qing era

[edit]
A Mongol woman seated for a portraiture, 1921

With the independence of Outer Mongolia, the Mongolian army controlled Khalkha and Khovd regions (modern day Uvs, Khovd, and Bayan-Ölgii provinces), but Northern Xinjiang (the Altai and Ili regions of the Qing empire), Upper Mongolia, Barga and Inner Mongolia came under control of the newly formed Republic of China. On February 2, 1913, the Bogd Khanate of Mongolia sent Mongolian cavalries to "liberate" Inner Mongolia from China. Russia refused to sell weapons to the Bogd Khanate, and the Russian czar, Nicholas II, referred to it as "Mongolian imperialism". Additionally, the United Kingdom urged Russia to abolish Mongolian independence as it was concerned that "if Mongolians gain independence, then Central Asians will revolt". 10,000 Khalkha and Inner Mongolian cavalries (about 3,500 Inner Mongols) defeated 70,000 Chinese soldiers and controlled almost all of Inner Mongolia; however, the Mongolian army retreated due to lack of weapons in 1914. 400 Mongol soldiers and 3,795 Chinese soldiers died in this war. The Khalkhas, Khovd Oirats, Buryats, Dzungarian Oirats, Upper Mongols, Barga Mongols, most Inner Mongolian and some Tuvan leaders sent statements to support Bogd Khan's call of Mongolian reunification. In reality however, most of them were too prudent or irresolute to attempt joining the Bogd Khan regime.[72] Russia encouraged Mongolia to become an autonomous region of China in 1914. Mongolia lost Barga, Dzungaria, Tuva, Upper Mongolia and Inner Mongolia in the 1915 Treaty of Kyakhta.

In October 1919, the Republic of China occupied Mongolia after the suspicious deaths of Mongolian patriotic nobles. On 3 February 1921 the White Russian army—led by Baron Ungern and mainly consisting of Mongolian volunteer cavalries, and Buryat and Tatar cossacks—liberated Ulaanbaatar. Baron Ungern's purpose was to find allies to defeat the Soviet Union. The Statement of Reunification of Mongolia was adopted by Mongolian revolutionaries in 1921. The Soviet, however, considered Mongolia to be Chinese territory in 1924 during a secret meeting with the Republic of China. Finally, the National Government of the Republic of China officially recognized Mongolian independence in 1945. Although the Soviet Union supported the Mongolian People's Republic, Soviets carried out various policies (political, economic and cultural) against Mongolia until its fall in 1991 to prevent Pan-Mongolism and other irredentist movements.[citation needed]

On 10 April 1932, Mongolians revolted against the government's new policy and Soviets. The government and Soviet soldiers defeated the rebels in October.

The Buryats started to migrate to Mongolia in the 1900s due to Russian oppression. Joseph Stalin's regime stopped the migration in 1930 and started a campaign of ethnic cleansing against newcomers and Mongolians. During the Stalinist repressions in Mongolia, almost all adult Buryat men and 22,000–33,000 Mongols (3–5% of the total population; common citizens, monks, Pan-Mongolists, nationalists, patriots, hundreds of military officers, nobles, intellectuals and elite people) were shot dead under Soviet orders.[73][74] Some authors also offer much higher estimates, up to 100,000 victims.[74] Around the late 1930s the Mongolian People's Republic had an overall population of about 700,000 to 900,000 people. By 1939, Soviet said "We repressed too many people, the population of Mongolia is only hundred thousands". The proportion of victims in relation to the population of the country is much higher than the corresponding figures of the Great Purge in the Soviet Union.

Khorloogiin Choibalsan, leader of the Mongolian People's Republic (left), and Georgy Zhukov consult during the Battle of Khalkhin Gol against Japanese troops, 1939

The Manchukuo (1932–1945), puppet state of the Empire of Japan (1868–1947) invaded Barga and some part of Inner Mongolia with Japanese help. The Mongolian army advanced to the Great Wall of China during the Soviet–Japanese War of 1945 (Mongolian name: Liberation War of 1945). Japan forced Inner Mongolian and Barga people to fight against Mongolians but they surrendered to Mongolians and started to fight against their Japanese and Manchu allies. Marshal Khorloogiin Choibalsan called Inner Mongolians and Xinjiang Oirats to migrate to Mongolia during the war but the Soviet Army blocked Inner Mongolian migrants' way. It was a part of a Pan-Mongolian plan and few Oirats and Inner Mongols (Huuchids, Bargas, Tümeds, about 800 Uzemchins) arrived. Inner Mongolian leaders carried out active policy to merge Inner Mongolia with Mongolia since 1911. They founded the Inner Mongolian Army in 1929 but the Inner Mongolian Army disbanded after ending World War II. The Japanese Empire supported Pan-Mongolism since the 1910s but there have never been active relations between Mongolia and Imperial Japan due to Russian resistance. The nominally independent Inner Mongolian Mengjiang state (1936–1945) was established with support of Japan in 1936; also, some Buryat and Inner Mongol nobles founded a Pan-Mongolist government with the support of Japan in 1919.

World War II Zaisan Memorial, Ulaan Baatar, from the Mongolian People's Republic era.

The Inner Mongols established the short-lived Republic of Inner Mongolia in 1945.

Another part of Choibalsan's plan was to merge Inner Mongolia and Dzungaria with Mongolia. By 1945, Chinese communist leader Mao Zedong requested the Soviets to stop Pan-Mongolism because China lost its control over Inner Mongolia and without Inner Mongolian support the Communists were unable to defeat Japan and Kuomintang.[citation needed]

Mongolia and Soviets supported the Uyghur and Kazakh separatist movement during the 1930s and 1940s. By 1945, the Soviets refused to support them after its alliance with the Chinese Communist Party and Mongolia interrupted its relations with the separatists under pressure. Xinjiang Oirat militant groups operated together the Turkic peoples but the Oirats did not have the leading role due to their small population. Basmachis or Turkic and Tajik militants fought to liberate Soviet Central Asia until 1942.[citation needed]

On February 2, 1913, the Treaty of friendship and alliance between the Government of Mongolia and Tibet was signed. Mongolian agents and Bogd Khan disrupted Soviet secret operations in Tibet to change its regime in the 1920s.[citation needed]

On October 27, 1961, Mongolia officially becomes a member of the United Nations.

The powerful states of Russia and China have committed many abuses against Mongols in their homeland, including war crimes and crimes against humanity, sometimes characterized as cultural genocide, with targets among the Mongol language, culture, tradition, history, religion, and ethnic identity. Peter the Great said: "The headwaters of the Yenisei River must be Russian land".[75] The Russian Empire sent the Kalmyks and Buryats to war to reduce the populations (World War I and other wars). During the 20th century, Soviet scientists attempted to convince the Kalmyks and Buryats that they're not Mongols during (demongolization policy). 35,000 Buryats were killed during a rebellion in 1927, and around one-third of the Buryat population in Russia died in the 1900s–1950s.[76][77] 10,000 Buryats of the Buryat-Mongol Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic were massacred by Stalin's order in the 1930s.[78] In 1919 the Buryats established a small theocratic Balagad state in Kizhinginsky District of Russia and it fell in 1926. In 1958, the name "Mongol" was removed from the name of the Buryat-Mongol Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic.

On 22 January 1922, Mongolia proposed to migrate the Kalmyks during the Kalmykian Famine but bolshevik Russia refused. 71,000–72,000 (93,000?; around half of the population) Kalmyks died during the Russian famine of 1921–22.[79] The Kalmyks revolted against the Soviet Union in 1926, 1930 and 1942–1943. In 1913, Nicholas II, tsar of Russia, said: "We need to prevent from Volg Tatars. But the Kalmyks are more dangerous than them because they are the Mongols so send them to war to reduce the population".[80] On 23 April 1923 Joseph Stalin, communist leader of Russia, said: "We are carrying out wrong policy on the Kalmyks who related to the Mongols. Our policy is too peaceful".[80] In March 1927, Soviet deported 20,000 Kalmyks to Siberia, the tundra and Karelia.The Kalmyks founded the sovereign Republic of Oirat-Kalmyk on 22 March 1930.[80] The Oirats' state had a small army and 200 Kalmyk soldiers defeated 1,700 Soviet soldiers in Durvud province of Kalmykia but the Oirats' state was destroyed by the Soviet Army in 1930. Kalmykian nationalists and Pan-Mongolists attempted to migrate Kalmyks to Mongolia in the 1920s. Mongolia suggested to migrate the Soviet Union's Mongols to Mongolia in the 1920s but Russia refused the suggestion.

Stalin deported all Kalmyks to Siberia in 1943 and around half of the (97,000–98,000) Kalmyks deported to Siberia died before being allowed to return home in 1957.[81] The government of the Soviet Union forbade teaching the Kalmyk language during the deportation. The Kalmyks' main purpose was to migrate to Mongolia and many Kalmyks joined the German Army. Marshal Khorloogiin Choibalsan attempted to migrate the deportees to Mongolia and he met with them in Siberia during his visit to Russia. Under the Law of the Russian Federation of April 26, 1991 "On Rehabilitation of Exiled Peoples," repressions against Kalmyks and other peoples were qualified as acts of genocide.

Mongolian President Tsakhiagiin Elbegdorj (right)

On 3 October 2002, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that Taiwan recognizes Mongolia as an independent country,[82] although no legislative actions were taken to address concerns over its constitutional claims to Mongolia.[83] Offices established to support Taipei's claims over Outer Mongolia, such as the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission,[84] lie dormant.

Agin-Buryat Okrug and Ust-Orda Buryat Okrugs merged with Irkutsk Oblast and Chita Oblast in 2008 despite Buryats' resistance. Small scale protests occurred in Inner Mongolia in 2011. The Inner Mongolian People's Party is a member of the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization[85] and its leaders are attempting to establish a sovereign state or merge Inner Mongolia with Mongolia.[citation needed]

A Mongolic Ger

Language

[edit]
Chronological tree of the Mongolic languages

Mongolian is the official national language of Mongolia, where it is spoken by nearly 2.8 million people (2010 estimate),[86] and the official provincial language of China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, where there are at least 4.1 million ethnic Mongols.[87] Across the whole of China, the language is spoken by roughly half of the country's 5.8 million ethnic Mongols (2005 estimate)[86] However, the exact number of Mongolian speakers in China is unknown, as there is no data available on the language proficiency of that country's citizens. The use of Mongolian in China, specifically in Inner Mongolia, has witnessed periods of decline and revival over the last few hundred years. The language experienced a decline during the late Qing period, a revival between 1947 and 1965, a second decline between 1966 and 1976, a second revival between 1977 and 1992, and a third decline between 1995 and 2012.[88] However, in spite of the decline of the Mongolian language in some of Inner Mongolia's urban areas and educational spheres, the ethnic identity of the urbanized Chinese-speaking Mongols is most likely going to survive due to the presence of urban ethnic communities.[89] The multilingual situation in Inner Mongolia does not appear to obstruct efforts by ethnic Mongols to preserve their language.[90][91] Although an unknown number of Mongols in China, such as the Tumets, may have completely or partially lost the ability to speak their language, they are still registered as ethnic Mongols and continue to identify themselves as ethnic Mongols.[86][92] The children of inter-ethnic Mongol-Chinese marriages also claim to be and are registered as ethnic Mongols.[93]

The specific origin of the Mongolic languages and associated tribes is unclear. Linguists have traditionally proposed a link to the Tungusic and Turkic language families, included alongside Mongolic in the broader group of Altaic languages, though this remains controversial. Today the Mongolian peoples speak at least one of several Mongolic languages including Mongolian, Buryat, Oirat, Dongxiang, Tu and Bonan. Additionally, many Mongols speak either Russian or Mandarin Chinese as languages of inter-ethnic communication.

Religion

[edit]
Buddhist temple in Buryatia, Russia
Timur of Mongolic origin himself had converted almost all the Borjigin leaders to Islam.

The original religion of the Mongolic peoples was Mongolian shamanism. The Xianbei came in contact with Confucianism and Daoism but eventually adopted Buddhism. However, the Xianbeis and some other people in Mongolia and Rourans followed a form of shamanism.[94] In the 5th century the Buddhist monk Dharmapriya was proclaimed "State Teacher" of the Rouran Khaganate and 3,000 families and some Rouran nobles became Buddhists. In 511 the Rouran Douluofubadoufa Khan sent Hong Xuan to the Tuoba court with a pearl-encrusted statue of the Buddha as a gift. The Tuoba Xianbei and Khitans were mostly Buddhists, although they still retained their original Shamanism. The Tuoba had a "sacrificial castle" to the west of their capital where ceremonies to spirits took place. Wooden statues of the spirits were erected on top of this sacrificial castle. One ritual involved seven princes with milk offerings who ascended the stairs with 20 female shamans and offered prayers, sprinkling the statues with the sacred milk. The Khitan had their holiest shrine on Mount Muye where portraits of their earliest ancestor Qishou Khagan, his wife Kedun and eight sons were kept in two temples. Mongolic peoples were also exposed to Zoroastrianism, Manicheism, Nestorianism, Eastern Orthodoxy and Islam from the west.

The Mongolic peoples, in particular the Borjigin, had their holiest shrine on Mount Burkhan Khaldun where their ancestor Börte Chono (Blue Wolf) and Goo Maral (Beautiful Doe) had given birth to them. Genghis Khan usually fasted, prayed and meditated on this mountain before his campaigns. As a young man he had thanked the mountain for saving his life and prayed at the foot of the mountain sprinkling offerings and bowing nine times to the east with his belt around his neck and his hat held at his chest. Genghis Khan kept a close watch on the Mongolic supreme shaman Kokochu Teb who sometimes conflicted with his authority. Later, Tengrism, the imperial cult of Genghis Khan centered on the eight white gers and nine white banners in Ordos grew into a highly organized indigenous religion with scriptures in the Mongolian script.[95] Indigenous moral precepts of the Mongolic peoples were enshrined in oral wisdom sayings (now collected in several volumes), the anda (blood-brother) system and ancient texts such as the Chinggis-un Bilig (Wisdom of Genghis) and Oyun Tulkhuur (Key of Intelligence). These moral precepts were expressed in poetic form and mainly involved truthfulness, fidelity, help in hardship, unity, self-control, fortitude, veneration of nature, veneration of the state and veneration of parents.

Melig, the younger son of Ögedei, was the first of the Mongolian royal line to accept Islam.

In 1254 Möngke Khan organized a formal religious debate (in which William of Rubruck took part) between Christians, Muslims and Buddhists in Karakorum, a cosmopolitan city of many religions. The Mongolic Empire was known for its religious tolerance, but had a special leaning towards Buddhism and was sympathetic towards Christianity while still worshipping Tengri. The Mongolic leader Abaqa Khan sent a delegation of 13–16 to the Second Council of Lyon (1274), which created a great stir, particularly when their leader 'Zaganus' underwent a public baptism. A joint crusade was announced in line with the Franco-Mongol alliance but did not materialize because Pope Gregory X died in 1276. Yahballaha III (1245–1317) and Rabban Bar Sauma (c. 1220–1294) were famous Mongolic Nestorian Christians. The Keraites in central Mongolia were Christian. In Istanbul the Church of Saint Mary of the Mongols stands as a reminder of the Byzantine-Mongol alliance.

The western Khanates, however, eventually adopted Islam (under Berke and Ghazan) and the Turkic languages (because of their commercial importance), although allegiance to the Great Khan and limited use of the Mongolic languages can be seen even in the 1330s. In 1521 the first Mughal emperor Babur took part in a military banner milk-sprinkling ceremony in the Chagatai Khanate where the Mongolian language was still used. Al-Adil Kitbugha (reigned 1294–1296), a Mongol Sultan of Egypt, and the half-Mongol An-Nasir Muhammad (reigned till 1341) built the Madrassa of Al-Nasir Muhammad in Cairo, Egypt. An-Nasir's Mongol mother was Ashlun bint Shaktay. The Mongolic nobility during the Yuan dynasty studied Confucianism, built Confucian temples (including Beijing Confucius Temple) and translated Confucian works into Mongolic but mainly followed the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism under Phags-pa Lama.

The general populace still practised Shamanism. Dongxiang and Bonan people adopted Islam, as did Moghol-speaking peoples in Afghanistan. In the 1576 the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism became the state religion of Mongolia. The Red Hat school of Tibetan Buddhism coexisted with the Gelug Yellow Hat school which was founded by the half-Mongol Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419). Shamanism was absorbed into the state religion while being marginalized in its purer forms, later only surviving in far northern Mongolia. Monks were some of the leading intellectuals in Mongolia, responsible for much of the literature and art of the pre-modern period. Many Buddhist philosophical works lost in Tibet and elsewhere are preserved in older and purer form in Mongolian ancient texts (e.g. the Mongol Kanjur). Zanabazar (1635–1723), Zaya Pandita (1599–1662) and Danzanravjaa (1803–1856) are among the most famous Mongol holy men. The 4th Dalai Lama Yonten Gyatso (1589–1617), a Mongol himself, is recognized as the only non-Tibetan Dalai Lama although the current 14th Dalai Lama is of Mongolic Monguor extraction.[96] The name is a combination of the Mongolian word dalai meaning "ocean" and the Tibetan word (bla-ma) meaning "guru, teacher, mentor".[1] Many Buryats became Orthodox Christians due to the Russian expansion. During the socialist period religion was officially banned, although it was practiced in clandestine circles. Today, a sizable proportion of Mongolic peoples are atheist or agnostic. In the most recent census in Mongolia, almost forty percent of the population reported as being atheist, while the majority religion was Tibetan Buddhism, with 53%.[97] Having survived suppression by the Communists, Buddhism among the Eastern, Northern, Southern and Western Mongols is today primarily of the Gelugpa school of Tibetan Buddhism. There is a strong shamanistic influence in the Gelugpa sect among the Mongols.[98]

Kinship and family life

[edit]
Mongols grazing livestock, by Roy Chapman Andrews photographs in 1921

The traditional Mongol family was patriarchal, patrilineal and patrilocal. Wives were brought for each of the sons, while daughters were married off to other clans. Wife-taking clans stood in a relation of inferiority to wife-giving clans. Thus wife-giving clans were considered "elder" or "bigger" in relation to wife-taking clans, who were considered "younger" or "smaller".[99][100] This distinction, symbolized in terms of "elder" and "younger" or "bigger" and "smaller", was carried into the clan and family as well, and all members of a lineage were terminologically distinguished by generation and age, with senior superior to junior.

In the traditional Mongolian family, each son received a part of the family herd as he married, with the elder son receiving more than the younger son. The youngest son would remain in the parental tent caring for his parents, and after their death he would inherit the parental tent in addition to his own part of the herd. This inheritance system was mandated by law codes such as the Yassa, created by Genghis Khan.[101] Likewise, each son inherited a part of the family's camping lands and pastures, with the elder son receiving more than the younger son. The eldest son inherited the farthest camping lands and pastures, and each son in turn inherited camping lands and pastures closer to the family tent until the youngest son inherited the camping lands and pastures immediately surrounding the family tent. Family units would often remain near each other and in close cooperation, though extended families would inevitably break up after a few generations. It is probable that the Yasa simply put into written law the principles of customary law.

It is apparent that in many cases, for example in family instructions, the yasa tacitly accepted the principles of customary law and avoided any interference with them. For example, Riasanovsky said that killing the man or the woman in case of adultery is a good illustration. Yasa permitted the institutions of polygamy and concubinage so characteristic of southerly nomadic peoples. Children born of concubines were legitimate. Seniority of children derived their status from their mother. Eldest son received more than the youngest after the death of father. But the latter inherited the household of the father. Children of concubines also received a share in the inheritance, in accordance with the instructions of their father (or with custom).

— Nilgün Dalkesen, Gender roles and women's status in Central Asia and Anatolia between the thirteenth and sixteenth centuries[102]

After the family, the next largest social units were the subclan and clan. These units were derived from groups claiming patrilineal descent from a common ancestor, ranked in order of seniority (the "conical clan"). By the Chingissid era this ranking was symbolically expressed at formal feasts, in which tribal chieftains were seated and received particular portions of the slaughtered animal according to their status.[103] The lineage structure of Central Asia had three different modes. It was organized on the basis of genealogical distance, or the proximity of individuals to one another on a graph of kinship; generational distance, or the rank of generation in relation to a common ancestor, and birth order, the rank of brothers in relation to each another.[104] The paternal descent lines were collaterally ranked according to the birth of their founders, and were thus considered senior and junior to each other. Of the various collateral patrilines, the senior in order of descent from the founding ancestor, the line of eldest sons, was the most noble. In the steppe, no one had his exact equal; everyone found his place in a system of collaterally ranked lines of descent from a common ancestor.[105] It was according to this idiom of superiority and inferiority of lineages derived from birth order that legal claims to superior rank were couched.[106]

The Mongol kinship is one of a particular patrilineal type classed as Omaha, in which relatives are grouped together under separate terms that crosscut generations, age, and even sexual difference. Thus, one uses different terms for a man's father's sister's children, his sister's children, and his daughter's children. A further attribute is strict terminological differentiation of siblings according to seniority.

The anthropologist Herbert Harold Vreeland visited three Mongol communities in 1920 and published a highly detailed book with the results of his fieldwork, Mongol community and kinship structure.[107]

Royal family

[edit]
Mural of a Mongol family, Yuan dynasty
The Mughal emperor Babur and his heir Humayun. The word Mughal is derived from the Persian word for Mongol.

The royal clan of the Mongols is the Borjigin clan descended from Bodonchar Munkhag (c. 850–900). This clan produced Khans and princes for Mongolia and surrounding regions until the early 20th century. All the Great Khans of the Mongol Empire, including its founder Genghis Khan, were of the Borjigin clan. The royal family of Mongolia was called the Altan Urag (Golden Lineage) and is synonymous with Genghisid. After the fall of the Northern Yuan dynasty in 1635 the Dayan Khanid aristocracy continued the Genghisid legacy in Mongolia until 1937 when most were killed during the Stalinist purges. The four hereditary Khans of the Khalkha (Tüsheet Khan, Setsen Khan, Zasagt Khan and Sain Noyan Khan) were all descended from Dayan Khan (1464–1543) through Abtai Sain Khan, Sholoi Khan, Laikhur Khan and Tumenkhen Sain Noyan respectively. Dayan Khan was himself raised to power by Queen Mandukhai (c. 1449–1510) during the crisis of the late 15th century when the line of Kublai Khan, the grandson of Genghis Khan, was on the verge of dying out.[citation needed]

The Khongirad was the main consort clan of the Borjigin and provided numerous Empresses and consorts. There were five minor non-Khonggirad inputs from the maternal side which passed on to the Dayan Khanid aristocracy of Mongolia and Inner Mongolia. The first was the Keraite lineage added through Kublai Khan's mother Sorghaghtani Beki which linked the Borjigin to the Nestorian Christian tribe of Cyriacus Buyruk Khan. The second was the Turkic Karluk lineage added through Toghon Temur Khan's mother Mailaiti which linked the Borjigin to Bilge Kul Qadir Khan (840–893) of the Kara-Khanid Khanate and ultimately to the Lion-Karluks as well as the Ashina tribe of the 6th century Göktürks. The third was the Korean lineage added through Biligtü Khan's mother Empress Gi (1315–370) which linked the Borjigin to the Haengju Gi clan and ultimately to King Jun of Gojeoson (262–184 BC) and possibly even further to King Tang of Shang (1675–1646 BCE) through Jizi. The fourth was the Esen Taishi lineage added through Bayanmunkh Jonon's mother Tsetseg Khatan which linked the Borjigin more firmly to the Oirats. The fifth was the Aisin-Gioro lineage added during the Qing dynasty. To the west, Genghisid Khans received daughters of the Byzantine emperor in marriage, such as when the Byzantine princess Maria Palaiologina married to Abaqa Khan (1234–1282), while there were also connections with European royalty through Russia, where, for example, Prince Gleb (1237–1278) married Feodora Sartaqovna the daughter of Sartaq Khan, a great-grandson of Genghis Khan.[citation needed]

The Dayan Khanid aristocracy still held power during the Bogd Khanate of Mongolia (1911–1919) and the Constitutional Monarchy period (1921–1924). They were accused of collaboration with the Japanese and executed in 1937 while their counterparts in Inner Mongolia were severely persecuted during the Cultural Revolution. Ancestral shrines of Genghis Khan were destroyed by the Red Guards during the 1960s and the Horse-Tail Banner of Genghis Khan disappeared.[citation needed]

Historical population

[edit]
Year Population Notes
1 AD 1–2,000,000?
1000 2,500,000? 750,000 Khitans
1200 2,600,000? 1,5–2,000,000 Mongols
1600 2,300,000? 77,000[108][109] Buryats; 600,000 Khalkhas
1700 2,600,000? 600,000 Khalkhas; 1,100,000? Oirats: 600,000 Zunghars, 200–250,000? Kalmyks, 200,000 Upper Mongols[60]
1800 2,000,000? 600,000 Khalkhas; 440,000? Oirats: 120,000 Zunghars, 120,000? Upper Mongols
1900 2,300,000? 283,383[110] Buryats (1897); 500,000? Khalkhas (1911); 380,000 Oirats: 70,000? Mongolian Oirats (1911), 190,648 Kalmyks (1897), 70,000? Dzungarian and Inner Mongolian Oirats, 50,000 Upper Mongols;[60] 1,500,000? Southern Mongols (1911)
1927 2,100,000? 600,000 Mongolians[111] — 230,000? Buryats: 15,000? Mongolian Buryats, 214,957 Buryats in Russia (1926); 500,000? Khalkhas (1927); 330,000? Oirats: 70,000 Mongolian Oirats, 128,809 Kalmyks (1926)
1956 2,500,000? 228,647 Buryats: 24,625 Mongolian Buryats (1956), 135,798 Buryats of the (Buryat Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic; 1959), 23,374 Agin-Buryats (1959), 44,850 Ust-Orda Buryats (1959); 639,141 Khalkhas (1956); 240,000? Oirats: 77,996 Mongolian Oirats (1956), 100,603 Kalmyks (1959), 1,462,956 Mongols in China (1953)
1980 4,300,000? 317,966? Buryats: 29,802 Mongolian Buryats (1979), 206,860 Buryatian Buryats (1979), 45,436 Usta-Orda Buryats (1979), 35,868 Agin-Buryats (1979); 1,271,086 Khalkhas; 398,339 Oirats: 127,328 Mongolian Oirats (1979), 140,103 Kalmyks (1979), 2,153,000 Southern Mongols (1981)[112][113]
1990 4,700,000? 376,629 Buryats: 35,444 Mongolian Buryats (1989), 249,525 Buryatian Buryats (1989), 49,298 Usta-Orda Buryats (1989), 42,362 Agin-Buryats (1989); 1,654,221 Khalkhas; 470,000? Oirats: 161,803 Mongolian Oirats (1989), 165,103 Kalmyks (1989), 33,000 Upper Mongols (1987);[114]
2010 5–9,200,000?[115] 500,000? Buryats (45–75,000 Mongolian Buryats, 10,000 Hulunbuir Buryats); 2,300,000 Khalkhas (including Dariganga, Darkhad, Eljigin and Sartuul); 638,372 Oirats: 183,372 Kalmyks, 205,000 Mongolian Oirats, 90–100, 000 Upper Mongols, 2010 — 140,000 Xinjiang Oirats; 2013 — 190,000? Xinjiang Oirats: 100,000? Torghuts (Kalmyks), 40–50,000? Olots, 40,000? other Oirats: mainly Khoshuts; 1,5–4,000,000? 5,700,000? Southern Mongols[112]
This map shows the boundary of the 13th-century Mongol Empire and location of today's Mongols in modern Mongolia, Russia and China.

Geographic distribution

[edit]

Today, the majority of Mongols live in the modern states of Mongolia, China (mainly Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang), Russia, Kyrgyzstan and Afghanistan.

The differentiation between tribes and peoples (ethnic groups) is handled differently depending on the country. The Tumed, Chahar, Ordos, Barga, Altai Uriankhai, Buryats, Dörböd (Dörvöd, Dörbed), Torguud, Dariganga, Üzemchin (or Üzümchin), Bayads, Khoton, Myangad (Mingad), Eljigin, Zakhchin, Darkhad, and Olots (or Öölds or Ölöts) are all considered as tribes of the Mongols.

Subgroups

[edit]

The Eastern Mongols are mainly concentrated in Mongolia, including the Khalkha, Eljigin Khalkha, Darkhad, Sartuul Khalkha, and Dariganga (Khalkha).

The Southern or Inner Mongols mainly are concentrated in Inner Mongolia, China. They comprise the Abaga Mongols, Abaganar, Aohans, Arkhorchin, Asud, Baarins, Chahar, Darkhan (Shar Darkhad), Dörvön Khüükhed, Durved, Gorlos, Kharchin, Khishigten, Khorchin, Huuchid, Ikhmyangan, Jalaid, Jaruud, Muumyangan, Naiman (Southern Mongols), Onnigud, Ordos, Sunud, Tümed, Urad, and Uzemchin.

Sister groups

[edit]

The Buryats are mainly concentrated in their homeland, the Buryat Republic, a federal subject of Russia. They are the major northern subgroup of the Mongols.[116] The Barga Mongols are mainly concentrated in Inner Mongolia, China, along with the Buryats and Hamnigan. Some orientalists also include the Soyots in the Buryat sub-ethnic groups.[117][118][119]

The Western Oirats are mainly concentrated in Western Mongolia:

  • 184,000 Kalmyks (2010) — Kalmykia, Russia
  • 205,000 Mongolian Oirats (2010)
  • 140,000 Oirats (2010) — Xinjiang region, China
  • 90,000 Upper Mongols (2010) — Qinghai region, China. The Khoshuts are the major subgroup of the Upper Mongols, along with the Choros, Khalkha and Torghuts.
  • 12,000 Sart Kalmyks (Zungharian descents) (2012) — Kyrgyzstan. Religion: Sunni Islam.

Altai Uriankhai, Baatud, Bayad, Chantuu, Choros, Durvud, Khoshut, Khoid, Khoton, Myangad, Olots, Sart Kalmyks (mainly Olots), Torghut, Zakhchin.

Mongolia

[edit]

In modern-day Mongolia, Mongols make up approximately 95% of the population, with the largest ethnic group being Khalkha Mongols, followed by Buryats, both belonging to the Eastern Mongolian peoples. They are followed by Oirats, who belong to the Western Mongolian peoples.

Mongolian ethnic groups: Baarin, Baatud, Barga, Bayad, Buryat, Selenge Chahar, Chantuu, Darkhad, Dariganga Dörbet Oirat, Eljigin, Khalkha, Hamnigan, Kharchin, Khoid, Khorchin, Hotogoid, Khoton, Huuchid, Myangad, Olots, Sartuul, Torgut, Tümed, Üzemchin, Zakhchin.

China

[edit]
Strong Mongol men at August games. Photo by Wm. Purdom, 1909

The 2010 census of the People's Republic of China counted more than 7 million people of various Mongolic groups. The 1992 census of China counted only 3.6 million ethnic Mongols.[citation needed] The 2010 census counted roughly 5.8 million ethnic Mongols, 621,500 Dongxiangs, 289,565 Mongours, 132,000 Daurs, 20,074 Baoans, and 14,370 Yugurs.[citation needed] Most of them live in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, followed by Liaoning. Small numbers can also be found in provinces near those two.

There were 669,972 Mongols in Liaoning in 2011, making up 11.52% of Mongols in China.[120] The closest Mongol area to the sea is the Dabao Mongol Ethnic Township (大堡蒙古族乡) in Fengcheng, Liaoning. With 8,460 Mongols (37.4% of the township population)[citation needed] it is located 40 km (25 mi) from the North Korean border and 65 km (40 mi) from Korea Bay of the Yellow Sea. Another contender for closest Mongol area to the sea would be Erdaowanzi Mongol Ethnic Township (二道湾子蒙古族乡) in Jianchang County, Liaoning. With 5,011 Mongols (20.7% of the township population)[citation needed] it is located around 65 km (40 mi) from the Bohai Sea.

Other peoples speaking Mongolic languages are the Daur, Sogwo Arig, Monguor people, Dongxiangs, Bonans, Sichuan Mongols and eastern part of the Yugur people. Those do not officially count as part of the Mongol ethnicity, but are recognized as ethnic groups of their own. The Mongols lost their contact with the Mongours, Bonan, Dongxiangs, Yunnan Mongols since the fall of the Yuan dynasty. Mongolian scientists and journalists met with the Dongxiangs and Yunnan Mongols in the 2000s.[citation needed]

Inner Mongolia: Southern Mongols, Barga, Buryat, Dörbet Oirat, Khalkha, Dzungar people, Eznee Torgut.

Xinjiang province: Altai Uriankhai, Chahar, Khoshut, Olots, Torghut, Zakhchin.

Qinghai province: Upper Mongols: Choros, Khoshut

Russia

[edit]
Buryat shaman of Olkhon, Lake Baikal in eastern Siberia

Two Mongolic ethnic groups are present in Russia; the 2010 census found 461,410 Buryats and 183,400 Kalmyks.[121]

Elsewhere

[edit]

Smaller numbers of Mongolic peoples exist in Western Europe and North America. Some of the more notable communities exist in South Korea, the United States, the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Mongols are an East Asian ethnic group native to the steppes of the , historically defined by their centered on herding livestock such as horses, sheep, and goats, which shaped their mobile, warrior society. Primarily consisting of subgroups like the Khalkha, they form the majority ethnic in , accounting for approximately 85% of its inhabitants, with significant communities in China's Autonomous Region and parts of . Originating from ancient nomadic confederations traceable to Bronze Age Slab Grave cultures and Iron Age Xiongnu populations on the Mongolian steppe, the Mongols achieved unification under Temüjin around 1206, when he was proclaimed Genghis Khan and formed the Khamag Mongol Ulus (All Mongol State) by subjugating rival tribes through alliances, warfare, and merit-based leadership. This consolidation enabled rapid expansion, leveraging superior cavalry tactics including feigned retreats, encirclement maneuvers, and composite bow archery from horseback, which emphasized mobility, deception, and coordinated unit discipline over static fortifications. The resulting , at its peak in the mid-, spanned from and the to the , incorporating diverse territories through relentless conquests that integrated conquered engineers for siege warfare and promoted trade via the , fostering exchanges of technologies, goods, and ideas across despite the immense human costs of the campaigns. Key achievements included administrative innovations like the yam relay postal system for communication, religious tolerance under the yassa legal code, and patronage of arts and scholarship during the in under , Genghis's grandson, though the empire fragmented into khanates amid internal strife and overextension by the late . Modern Mongols, numbering around 10 million globally, retain cultural elements like eagle hunting and naadam festivals, while navigating post-communist transitions in and ethnic tensions in .

Terminology

Etymology

The term "Mongol" originates from the name of a specific transcribed in Chinese historical as Menggu (蒙古), first attested in the among the Shiwei nomadic groups inhabiting the eastern steppes north of the Khitan . This designation referred to a localized clan or subtribe, distinct from neighboring groups like the Tatar or Kerait, and likely derived from a Proto-Mongolic ethnonym Mongɣol or Moŋqol. Prior to the unification under Temüjin (later ) around 1206, self-designations among proto-Mongolic nomads emphasized or tribal affiliations rather than a "Mongol" identity; for instance, Temüjin's own traced descent from the mythical Bodonchar, while allied groups like the Kereyit or Naiman maintained separate totemic or genealogical labels. The Menggu term reemerged prominently in the early 13th century as 's confederation adopted it as a unifying , extending it to encompass subjugated tribes and forming the basis for the Mongol ulus (Mongol or state). Linguistically, "Mongol" carries connotations of bravery or resilience in Mongolian, reflecting the martial ethos of steppe pastoralists, though earlier folk etymologies linking it to terms like "eternal" (mönkh) or unrelated Rouran names such as Mugulü lack direct attestation in primary sources. Post-imperial usage distinguished "Mongols" as the core ethnic group of Genghisid descent from the wider array of Mongolic-speaking peoples, including later divergent branches like the Oirat or eastern Mongols, who shared linguistic affinities but not always political unity.

Modern designations and subgroups

The major modern subgroups of Mongols are distinguished primarily by dialects of the and patterns of self-reported ethnic identity in national censuses, encompassing the Khalkha, , and as core groups united by shared linguistic and while maintaining distinct self-designations. The Khalkha, who speak the Khalkha dialect serving as the foundation for standard Mongolian, represent the largest subgroup and constitute 83.8% of Mongolia's population per 2020 estimates. , a western Mongolic group speaking Oirat dialects, include subgroups such as the Dörbet (2.6% of Mongolia's population) and Bayad (2%), with self-identifying communities like the in Russia's Republic tracing descent from Oirat migrants and preserving Oirat-language traditions. , a northern subgroup speaking the Buryat dialect, self-identify as Buryaad and comprise 1.4% of Mongolia's population alongside larger populations in Russia's where they form a titular ethnic group. In Mongolia, reflect granular self-identifications among these subgroups, with "Khalkha-Mongol" often denoting the eastern speakers as the national core, while smaller Oirat and Buryat communities maintain distinct tribal affiliations within the broader Mongol . By contrast, China's ethnic aggregates diverse Mongolic-speaking populations—including Inner Mongolian eastern dialect groups, Oirats, and Buryats—under a unified "Mongol" minority designation, numbering around 6 million primarily in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, without recognizing subgroups for administrative purposes. This contrasts with , where Kalmyks and Buryats are enumerated as separate ethnicities despite their Mongolic linguistic roots, reflecting localized self-identifications shaped by historical migrations and state policies. While core Mongol subgroups share Mongolic dialects—divided into eastern (Khalkha, Buryat) and western (Oirat) branches—related populations with Turkic or Tungusic admixtures, such as certain Kazakh or Evenki communities, are not conflated with Mongols in modern self-identifications or censuses, preserving distinctions based on primary language and genealogy.

Origins

Prehistoric and archaeological evidence

Archaeological evidence from the reveals a Late characterized by the Deer Stone-Khirigsuur Complex, approximately BCE, featuring tall anthropomorphic stelae known as deer stones erected near circular burial mounds called khirigsuurs. These monuments, concentrated in central and northern , often depict flying deer motifs, belts, and solar symbols on their surfaces, suggesting significance tied to elite funerary practices and possibly warrior symbolism. Over 1,200 deer stones have been documented in , comprising about 80% of global examples, with khirigsuurs containing horse sacrifices—up to 40 per mound in some cases—indicating emerging pastoral reliance on equids for mobility and status display. This complex marks a transition from earlier Bronze Age kurgan burials, which featured simpler mound structures and bronze artifacts across the plateau, to more elaborate Iron Age pastoralism evident in increased mobility and horse management. Excavations show horse remains in ritual contexts from circa 1200 BCE, with demographic profiles consistent with managed herds rather than wild populations, supporting the development of transport and herding practices that facilitated steppe-wide interactions. Slab-grave cultures, emerging around 1000–300 BCE, further attest to this shift through rectangular stone-lined tombs containing bronze tools, weapons, and pottery, reflecting localized adaptations in material culture amid broader nomadic confederations. Into the early centuries CE, Xiongnu-period sites in Mongolia provide evidence of intensified nomadic pastoralism, with burial complexes like Noin-Ula yielding felt wall hangings, lacquered Chinese imports, bronze cauldrons, and iron weapons interred in log-chamber tombs under kurgans. These artifacts, dated roughly 200 BCE–100 CE, include horse gear and wagons, underscoring advanced equestrian technology and trade networks that sustained mobile herding economies across the plateau. Such findings highlight continuity in burial mound traditions from Bronze Age precursors while demonstrating technological refinements in metallurgy and animal husbandry that underpinned later steppe societies.

References in ancient Chinese and other texts

The earliest references to the Mongols appear in (618–907 CE) records as the Mengwu Shiwei (蒙兀室韋), designating one of over twenty fragmented Shiwei tribes residing in forested and regions northeast of the Khitan territories and east of the remnants of the Göktürk Khaganate. These tribes paid intermittent tribute to Tang authorities, such as in 630 CE when Shiwei envoys submitted to Emperor Taizong, but operated as loosely allied hunter-gatherers rather than a unified polity. The Jiu Tang shu (Old Book of Tang, compiled ca. 945 CE) explicitly names the Mengwu among Shiwei subgroups, transcribing their ethnonym in a manner later evolving into Menggu (蒙古) during the Liao dynasty (907–1125 CE), reflecting phonetic adaptations rather than a sudden emergence. This distinguishes them from the Xianbei, an earlier nomadic confederation (ca. 3rd–6th centuries CE) whose remnants had largely assimilated or dispersed by Tang times, with Shiwei texts portraying the latter as a collateral eastern branch unconnected to Xianbei ruling elites like the Tuoba. Song dynasty (960–1279 CE) annals, such as the Liao shi, further reference related groups as Ta-Tan or Da-Dan (likely Tatars), rivals to the Menggu tribes, but maintain the Shiwei-Mengwu as peripheral forest-dwellers without centralized leadership. These sparse mentions—totaling fewer than a dozen in Tang and early Song compilations—highlight the absence of a cohesive "Mongol" identity prior to the 12th century, depicting them instead as tribal subunits amid broader nomadic mosaics, vulnerable to domination by Khitans or Jurchens and lacking the imperial pretensions later attributed to Genghis Khan's unification.

Genetic and anthropological foundations

Genomic analyses of ancient and modern Mongolian populations indicate a predominant ancestry rooted in Northeast Asian steppe components, with strong affinities to proto-Mongolic groups from regions like and the basin. Studies of Oirat-speaking groups, including those in Western Mongolia and , demonstrate genetic continuity with (ANA) populations, such as Devil’s Gate and Fofonovo samples, reflecting origins in eastern steppe pastoralist lineages preserved through and high effective sizes dating back to the 13th–14th centuries. This Northeast Asian foundation aligns with broader Altaic-speaking affinities, characterized by limited gene flow from neighboring Altaian groups until the . In Xinjiang Mongolian samples, Y-chromosome data further supports Northeast Asian origins, with dominant haplogroups like C2a1a3-F1918, C2a1a2-M48, and N1a1a-M178 tracing to sources and time to (TMRCA) estimates of approximately 730–770 years , coinciding with westward migrations. positions these groups proximal to Inner Mongolian Mongols and northwest Chinese ethnicities, underscoring East Asian genetic structure with affinities to early nomadic confederations. Admixture analyses reveal subsequent , including from Turkic sources via haplogroup R1a1a-M17 (TMRCA ~552 years BP), linked to interactions during the era. Broader Mongolic studies detect additional admixture events with Tungusic and Turkic populations around 170–1,700 years ago, alongside minor Indo-European inputs, shaping a composite profile through pastoralist expansions. Anthropological examinations of Mongol physical traits highlight cranial features adapted to the demands of on the . Populations exhibit brachycephalic ( indicating skulls), hypsicephalic (high vault), and metriocephalic tendencies, alongside euryprosopic (-faced) morphology, which correlate with environmental pressures of high-altitude, arid pastoral mobility. These somatometric patterns, including robust structures and epicanthic folds, reflect selective adaptations for in , windy conditions inherent to lifestyles, distinct from sedentary agricultural groups. Such traits underscore causal links between genetic steppe heritage and phenotypic responses to millennia of transhumant economies.

Pre-Imperial and Imperial History

Nomadic confederations before unification

The Mongolian steppe in the 12th century featured fragmented nomadic confederations, primarily the Tatar, Keraite, Naiman, and Merkit groups, alongside the emerging Khamag Mongol alliance, each comprising multiple clans engaged in perpetual rivalries over grazing lands and water sources. These entities lacked centralized authority, with leadership rotating among khans based on kinship ties and military prowess, leading to frequent shifts in power through assassinations and coups. Dry climatic conditions from the 1180s onward exacerbated resource scarcity, prompting intensified inter-tribal conflicts as herds dwindled and migrations overlapped, fostering a cycle of raids that destabilized alliances. feuds, often rooted in blood vendettas over stolen brides or , reinforced a where horsemanship, , and tactical ambushes became essential , transmitted through oral traditions and . Temporary pacts, sealed by marriages or exchanges, provided fleeting stability but dissolved amid betrayals, as seen in recurrent Tatar-Naiman skirmishes. The economic foundation rested on of sheep, , , and camels, with seasonal dictating mobility across the to exploit variable pastures. Raiding supplemented by capturing and from or sedentary neighbors like the Jurchens, treating as portable wealth that incentivized warfare and deterred sedentary lifestyles. This predatory , coupled with environmental pressures, amplified the appeal of broader confederations for defense and offense, though entrenched clan loyalties perpetuated division until external unification efforts.

Rise of Genghis Khan and empire formation (1162–1227)

Temüjin, later known as Genghis Khan, was born circa 1162 near the Onon River in the Mongol heartland to Yesügei, a minor chieftain of the Borjigin clan, and his wife Hö'elün of the Olkhonud tribe. Yesügei arranged Temüjin's betrothal to Börte, daughter of a Merkid ally, when Temüjin was about nine years old, a common steppe practice to forge bonds through marriage alliances. Following Yesügei's poisoning by rival Tatars around 1171, the family faced abandonment by their tribe under Mongol custom, leading to years of starvation, raids, and internal strife; Temüjin killed his half-brother Bekter in a dispute over food, asserting dominance through raw survival imperatives rather than kinship norms. Temüjin rebuilt influence through strategic pacts and coercion, allying initially with childhood anda (blood brother) Jamuqa and Kerait leader Toghrul, who helped rescue Börte after her abduction by Merkits in 1187, an event that solidified loyalties via shared vengeance. He expanded via marriages, betrothing sons and daughters to tribal elites—such as Jochi to a Kereit princess and daughters to Naiman and Onggud leaders—to bind potential rivals, while ruthlessly eliminating threats like the Tayichi'ud clan that had enslaved him briefly in the 1180s. By the early 1200s, Temüjin defeated Jamuqa's coalition, subjugated the Kereit and Naiman confederations through superior cavalry maneuvers and intelligence from spies, and absorbed defectors by offering shares of plunder over blood ties, demonstrating leadership rooted in incentive alignment and merit rather than hereditary claims. In 1206, a assembly of tribal nobles proclaimed Temüjin as Chinggis Khan ("universal "), formalizing unification of disparate Mongol and Turkic-Mongol tribes into a single entity under centralized command, ending endemic feuds that had fragmented the for generations. This reflected pragmatic consensus: Temüjin's proven to deliver victories and loot outweighed traditionalist opposition, as evidenced by the absorption of over 95 tribes by or submission. Post-unification, he implemented reforms to sustain cohesion, organizing the into units—arbans of 10, jaghuns of 100, mingghans of 1,000, and tumens of 10,000—commanded by appointed loyalists regardless of lineage, enabling scalable discipline and rapid of up to 100,000 warriors. Genghis Khan established the Yassa, an oral legal code emphasizing absolute obedience, collective responsibility for crimes, and severe penalties for infractions like theft or desertion, which supplanted inconsistent tribal customs with uniform enforcement to curb nomadic indiscipline. He introduced the yam system of relay stations with horse changes every 25-30 miles, facilitating intelligence and edicts across vast distances, a logistical innovation derived from observing Liao and Jin practices but adapted for steppe mobility. These measures prioritized causal efficacy—meritocratic promotion to harness talent, coercion against betrayal, and administrative tools to mitigate distance-induced fragmentation—over ritual or egalitarian ideals. To consolidate power and resources, Genghis launched initial campaigns against sedentary neighbors. In 1207-1209, he invaded , using feigned retreats and river-diversion tactics to besiege , forcing Li An'quan to submit as vassal and provide troops, engineers, and tribute of 3,000 horses plus silk, without full annihilation to preserve utility. Against the Jin dynasty, raids escalated to a 1211 invasion through the Gobi, where 30,000 Mongols shattered Jin frontier defenses at Fox Ridge via concentrated and envelopment, exploiting Jin overextension; by 1214, Jin Xuanzong sued for with 3,000 jin of silver and 500 youths, though Genghis pressed on, sacking Zhongdu () in 1215 after prolonged using captured trebuchets. These operations underscored tactical realism: intelligence-driven strikes on weak points, of siege technology from foes, and psychological warfare via mass executions of resisters to induce surrenders, yielding manpower and revenue for further expansion by 1227.

Major conquests and expansions (1227–1260)

Following Genghis Khan's death in 1227, his son Ögedei ascended as Great Khan in 1229 and directed further military campaigns that vastly enlarged the empire's domain. Under his command, Mongol forces completed the subjugation of the Jin dynasty in northern China by 1234, securing territories north of the Yangtze River. Simultaneously, expeditions penetrated deeper into the Islamic world, occupying Georgia and Armenia while advancing into Persia and the Caucasus. In the western theater, Ögedei dispatched generals and to conquer the steppe nomads and Slavic principalities, initiating campaigns in 1236 against the and Kipchak confederations. By 1240, these forces had sacked Kiev, the capital of Kievan Rus', and subdued major Russian principalities, incorporating them as vassals. The invasion extended into in 1241, with victories at the in and the in , where Hungarian and Polish armies were decisively defeated, allowing Mongol armies to ravage as far as the . These operations, leveraging Mongol composite bows, mobility, and tactical encirclements, halted abruptly upon Ögedei's in 1241, prompting Subutai's withdrawal. Ögedei's successor, Möngke Khan (r. 1251–1259), revitalized expansion by commissioning his brother Hulagu to subdue the Middle East in 1253. Hulagu's army, estimated at 150,000, captured key Abbasid strongholds and besieged Baghdad in January 1258, leading to the city's surrender on February 10 after breaching its walls with siege engines. This conquest dismantled the Abbasid Caliphate, with Mongol forces subsequently advancing into Syria before clashing with Mamluk Egyptians at Ain Jalut in 1260, marking a temporary eastern limit. Concurrently, Möngke intensified assaults on the in southern , deploying over 100,000 troops in 1253 to seize the as a staging ground. led probing invasions southward, culminating in the prolonged fortress in 1259, which resisted despite Mongol engineering but foreshadowed further penetrations. By 1260, these multifaceted campaigns had expanded the empire to approximately 24 million square kilometers, integrating advanced siege technologies from conquered regions like Persia and to sustain logistical superiority. This pragmatic adoption of foreign innovations, combined with terror tactics and merit-based command, underpinned the era's unprecedented territorial growth.

Fragmentation into khanates (1260–1368)

The death of in August 1259 during the siege of Diaoyu Castle triggered the (1260–1264), a succession struggle among the sons of that exposed underlying fractures in the Mongol Empire's unity. , campaigning in , proclaimed himself Great Khan at a in 1260, but his brother , based in , convened a rival assembly and mobilized core Mongol forces against him. The conflict, marked by sieges and blockades that strained resources across the steppe heartland, ended with Ariq Böke's surrender in 1264 after Kublai's forces captured key cities like Wuchang and isolated his supply lines. This war formalized the devolution of authority to semi-autonomous uluses, as peripheral khans withheld recognition of Kublai's supremacy to preserve their regional power bases, initiating the empire's fragmentation into independent khanates. By the late 1260s, the empire had divided into four major khanates, each ruled by descendants of Genghis Khan's sons and adapting to local conditions amid overextension across Eurasia, which spanned over 23 million square kilometers and strained administrative control through vast distances and diverse populations. The Yuan dynasty, under Kublai (r. 1260–1294), consolidated control over China and Mongolia, proclaiming the dynasty in 1271 after conquering the Southern Song by 1279, though it faced rebellions and fiscal pressures from sedentary governance. The Golden Horde, led by Jochid rulers like Berke (r. 1257–1266), dominated the western steppes and Rus' principalities, extracting tribute from over 40 cities by the 1270s. The Chagatai Khanate in Central Asia, initially under Möngke's appointees, fragmented into eastern and western branches by the 1340s due to internal feuds, while the Ilkhanate in Persia, founded by Hulagu (r. 1256–1265), governed from Baghdad after its 1258 sack, incorporating Persian bureaucracy. Succession disputes, lacking codified primogeniture, fueled chronic instability, as rival claimants within lineages vied for thrones, eroding centralized loyalty to the Great Khan. Inter-khanate rivalries exacerbated divisions, with conflicts like the (1262–1263) pitting the against the over Caucasian territories and culminating in Berke's invasion of Persia, which diverted resources and killed thousands. Similarly, the (1268–1283) saw Chagatai claimant challenge Yuan dominance in , allying with the and sustaining guerrilla warfare that tied down tens of thousands of troops until Kaidu's death in 1301. These wars, rooted in disputes over appanages and trade routes like the , prevented coordinated expansion and fostered alliances with local foes, such as the Mamluks aiding the against the . In the western khanates, rulers adapted by adopting —Berke converting around 1260 to secure Turkic-Muslim support, followed by Ilkhanid in 1295, who imposed and built mosques, while Chagatai khans embraced it by the 1320s—facilitating integration with sedentary subjects but alienating steppe traditionalists and Yuan authorities who retained and . Environmental and demographic shocks accelerated collapse, particularly the (1346–1353), which originated in Mongol-controlled and ravaged khanates, killing elites like of the in 1357 and decimating armies and trade networks, with mortality estimates reaching 30–50% in affected regions. Overextension compounded these vulnerabilities: the empire's horse-based logistics faltered over 5,000-kilometer supply lines, while assimilated administrators prioritized local revenues over nomadic cohesion, leading to revolts and fiscal insolvency. By 1335, the Ilkhanate disintegrated into local dynasties amid succession vacuums; Chagatai splintered further by the 1360s under warlords like Timur; and the Yuan faced Red Turban rebellions, culminating in its 1368 expulsion from China, though khanate remnants persisted in Mongolia. This era's causal dynamics—recurrent civil wars, religious divergences, and pandemics—demonstrated how initial conquest momentum yielded to entropy in ungovernable expanse, without institutional reforms to mitigate hereditary rivalries.

Post-Imperial History

Northern Yuan and decline (1368–1635)

After the drove the Yuan from in 1368, the last Yuan retreated to the , where he and his successors maintained a nominal claim to the imperial title as khans of the . This period marked a shift from centralized rule to fragmented tribal confederations, with ongoing civil strife between the eastern and western weakening unified authority. Oirat leaders gained ascendancy in the mid-15th century, exemplified by , who in 1449 defeated a Ming expeditionary force at the Battle of Tumu Fortress, capturing Yingzong and briefly proclaiming himself khan in 1453 before his the following year. This incursion disrupted Ming defenses but failed to secure lasting gains, as Esen's forces could not capitalize on the to besiege effectively. Subsequent decades saw recurring raids on Ming borders, sustaining economic extraction through and , yet internal divisions prevented coordinated reconquest efforts. By the 16th century, eastern Mongol leader intensified pressures on the Ming through persistent campaigns, while fostering ties with Tibetan lamas, marking a deepened integration of among Mongol elites. This religious shift, building on Yuan-era precedents, emphasized Gelugpa doctrines and helped legitimize khanal claims amid eroding military cohesion. Cultural elements like and Genghisid lineage persisted, but prolonged warfare and factionalism contributed to population losses from battle, disease, and migration. The dynasty's end came under (r. 1604–1634), who sought to revive supremacy by subjugating rival tribes and warring against the Ming, but faced rising Manchu power under . Ligdan's flight to Tibet in 1634, followed by his death from , left his Chahar forces depleted; his son submitted to the Manchus in 1636, conventionally dating the Northern Yuan's termination to 1635. This absorption reflected broader assimilation trends, with Mongol polities increasingly vassalized amid demographic strain and external conquests.

Integration under Qing rule (1635–1911)

The Qing dynasty began incorporating Mongol tribes into its administrative structure in 1635, following the submission of Ejei Khan, the last Northern Yuan ruler, which marked the end of nominal Mongol independence. This integration extended to organizing Mongol allies into a separate hierarchy of Mongol Banners under Manchu command by 1636, paralleling the Manchu Eight Banners system. The Qing divided Mongolia into Inner and Outer regions, with Inner Mongolia more closely administered through 49 banners grouped into leagues (aimags), while Outer Mongolia consisted of four larger aimags under Khalkha nobles who swore allegiance in 1691. This banner organization subordinated Mongol nobility to Qing oversight, requiring tribute, military levies, and prohibiting unified resistance by dealing with tribes individually. To maintain control, the Qing promoted Tibetan Gelugpa Buddhism among Mongols, fostering the growth of lamaseries that became central to the economy. By the 19th century, monasteries absorbed up to 50% of the male population as lamas, shifting resources from pastoral herding to monastic endowments and rituals, which exacerbated economic stagnation and indebtedness among lay Mongols due to heavy taxation and corvée obligations to Beijing. This policy, while pacifying potential unrest through religious hierarchy aligned with Qing patronage, contributed to demographic decline in productive herders and increased reliance on monastic trade networks, including cross-border commerce with Russia facilitated by lamas. Mongol autonomy eroded through suppressed rebellions, notably the Oirat (Dzungar) uprisings. The Dzungar Khanate, a western Oirat confederation, resisted Qing expansion from the late 17th century, leading to prolonged wars culminating in the 1755–1758 campaigns under the Qianlong Emperor. Qing forces, leveraging superior logistics and alliances with other Mongols, defeated the Dzungars, resulting in the extermination of 70–80% of their population through direct killings, famine, and disease, effectively eliminating the khanate and incorporating surviving Oirats into Qing banners. Such suppressions deterred further large-scale revolts but highlighted the causal overreach of Qing imperial ambitions, as the costs of pacification strained resources and fostered resentment among subjugated groups. Demographic shifts accelerated assimilation, particularly in Inner Mongolia, where Qing policies permitted limited migration for agricultural support of garrisons and trade. Han settlers, often as "Mongol followers" serving nobles or engaging in farming, intermarried and adopted Mongol , leading to partial Mongolization of immigrants while introducing sedentary practices that competed with . In Outer Mongolia, restrictions preserved greater Mongol demographic dominance until the late , but Han merchants and officials still influenced local economies, contributing to the gradual of traditional Mongol under Qing rule.

20th-century upheavals and independence (1911–present)

Following the Xinhai that overthrew the , Outer declared independence on December 29, 1911, establishing the Bogd Khanate under the eighth Jebtsundamba Khutughtu as theocratic ruler, with support from local nobles and Russian backing to counter Chinese reconquest. This autonomy faced challenges, including Chinese occupation in 1919 and the brief rule of White Russian warlord in 1921, who sought to restore the monarchy but alienated locals through brutality. The , founded in 1920 by figures like and influenced by Bolshevik ideology, requested Soviet military aid, leading to the 1921 where combined Mongolian and forces expelled Chinese troops and Ungern's forces by , paving the way for the proclaimed in 1924. Soviet influence dominated thereafter, with serving as a buffer state; collectivization of livestock herding began in the 1930s, and under leader Khorloogiin Choibalsan, Stalinist purges from 1937 to 1939 targeted perceived enemies, resulting in the execution or imprisonment of tens of thousands, including over 18,000 Buddhist lamas and the destruction of more than 700 monasteries, decimating traditional religious structures. recognized Mongolian independence in 1945 under Soviet pressure during World War II, formalized in 1946. The Mongolian People's Republic remained a Soviet satellite through the Cold War, with economic dependence on Moscow aid and alignment in foreign policy, including support for Soviet interventions elsewhere. Widespread protests in 1989–1990, inspired by Eastern Europe's changes and the Soviet Union's weakening grip, culminated in the Democratic Revolution; hunger strikes and mass rallies pressured the communist Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party to concede multi-party elections in July 1990, marking the shift to parliamentary democracy and market reforms by 1992. Mongolia has since maintained a stable democracy, with competitive elections and peaceful power transfers, despite economic challenges from the transition. As of 2025, its population stands at approximately 3.5 million, predominantly urbanized yet retaining nomadic traditions. In contrast, Inner Mongolia was incorporated into the People's Republic of China as an autonomous region in 1947, initially encompassing limited territories before expansion, under Communist control to secure Mongol support during the civil war against Nationalists; autonomy has been nominal, with policies emphasizing Han migration and cultural assimilation, including recent crackdowns on Mongolian-language education. Recent genetic studies, such as a 2024 analysis of Xinjiang Mongols, highlight migrations from Northeast Asia and genetic continuity among Mongol groups, informing preservation efforts amid modernization pressures.

Society and Economy

Kinship, family, and social structures

Traditional Mongol society emphasized patrilineal descent, tracing through male lines from fathers to sons, forming progressively inclusive lineages that structured and identity. The primary unit was the obog (or ovog), a grouping men related agnatically along with their wives and dependents, which served as the foundation for tribal affiliations and loyalties before imperial unification. These clans enforced exogamy rules, prohibiting within seven paternal generations and three maternal ones to maintain genetic diversity and alliance networks. Family structures centered on extended households combining nuclear units under patriarchal authority, where elder males directed resource allocation and migration decisions amid . Marriage practices reinforced clan ties, often through alliances, with levirate unions common: a widow typically wed her husband's younger brother to preserve , herds, and paternal lineage continuity, reflecting pragmatic adaptations to high male mortality from herding hazards and conflicts. This custom, rooted in economic imperatives rather than sentiment, ensured labor stability and prevented fragmentation of nomadic encampments. Women exercised substantial agency in daily operations, managing yurt disassembly, packing carts with household goods, and herding livestock—tasks essential for mobility and survival in steppe environments, which granted them leverage in family decisions. Their oversight of dairy processing, fuel collection, and camp maintenance during male absences for hunts or raids underscored a division of labor that valued female contributions to economic self-sufficiency, fostering relative independence uncommon in sedentary agrarian societies. Occasionally, women defended homesteads or joined combat when manpower shortages arose, as evidenced by accounts of armed participation in defensive actions. Social stratification featured a hierarchy of nobility (noyads from elite lineages), free herders, and semi-servile dependents, yet imperial reforms introduced meritocratic elements, enabling capable commoners to ascend via proven loyalty and skill, thereby diluting birth-based privileges and enhancing cohesion across diverse clans. This system prioritized competence in administration and resource management, allowing social mobility that stabilized the expansive nomadic confederations against internal rivalries.

Military organization and warfare tactics

The Mongol army employed a decimal organizational system established by Genghis Khan following his unification of tribes in 1206, dividing forces into units of 10 warriors (arban), 100 (jaghun), 1,000 (mingghan), and 10,000 (tumen), each led by commanders chosen for competence rather than tribal affiliation. This merit-based hierarchy fostered discipline and loyalty to the khan, enabling scalable operations where tumens could maneuver independently yet coordinate effectively under overarching strategy. Central to Mongol warfare was the supremacy of mounted archery, with warriors wielding powerful composite recurve bows capable of ranges exceeding 300 meters while galloping at speeds up to 50 kilometers per hour. Each soldier maintained 3 to 5 horses, rotating mounts to sustain high mobility and cover distances of 100 kilometers daily without fatigue, allowing hit-and-run tactics that harassed enemies while preserving Mongol forces. Feigned retreats formed a signature maneuver, where vanguard archers simulated rout to lure pursuers into ambushes by hidden reserves, as demonstrated in battles against numerically superior foes like the Jin dynasty armies in the 1210s. For fortified targets, Mongols initially relied on encirclement and starvation but rapidly integrated siege engineering from conquered specialists, employing Persian and Chinese artisans to construct trebuchets, catapults, and gunpowder weapons by the 1220s. Logistics emphasized self-sufficiency, with herds of sheep and horses supplying milk, blood, and meat, supplemented by tribute from subjugated populations, minimizing supply lines and enabling sustained campaigns across vast terrains. This fusion of nomadic mobility, tactical deception, and adaptive technology allowed smaller forces to defeat larger sedentary armies through superior speed and coordination.

Governance, law, and administration

The Mongol Empire's legal foundation rested on the Yassa, an oral code promulgated by Genghis Khan that prioritized obedience to the ruler, clan cohesion among nomadic tribes, and the eradication of wrongdoing through unyielding enforcement. This framework regulated military discipline, inheritance rights, and public conduct, functioning as a pragmatic tool for imperial cohesion rather than a comprehensive codified statute, with violations often met by execution to deter dissent and corruption among officials. Administrative control was exerted through mechanisms like universal censuses and structured taxation, exemplified by Möngke Khan's empire-wide enumeration initiated in 1252 and extending to remote areas like Novgorod by 1259, which tabulated populations for equitable revenue extraction and military levies. In conquered regions, such as , this shifted peasants from capricious exactions to fixed tax quotas, enhancing predictability and reducing local revolts while funding nomadic mobility. Overseers known as darughachi were dispatched to provinces to supervise these collections, enforce decrees, and monitor loyalty, their broad initial mandates evolving into targeted fiscal and judicial roles amid the empire's expanse. Religious emphasized tolerance as a stabilizing expedient, with shamans, , clerics, and imams exempted from taxes and to secure across ethnic divides, while prohibiting practices like that conflicted with . This approach, rooted in Tengrist yet accommodating , , , and others, facilitated by minimizing ideological , though favoritism toward useful faiths underscored its utilitarian basis over principled pluralism. Post-1260 fragmentation into khanates—such as the Yuan, Chagatai, , and —entailed pronounced , as regional khans wielded autonomous over taxation, , and local alliances, adapting Yassa tenets to sedentary bureaucracies while preserving nomadic oversight via periodic assemblies and tribute flows to the central . This sustained administrative by leveraging clan-based inherent to Mongol , averting over-centralization's logistical strains, though it hastened dynastic rivalries.

Economic systems and trade networks

The Mongol economy was fundamentally based on , with households herding five primary —sheep, , , , and camels—for , , , , and needs, necessitating seasonal migrations across steppes in search of and . This supported self-sufficiency but limited surplus production until imperial expansion incorporated tribute and taxation from sedentary subjects. Under and successors, tribute extraction—via alban (periodic levies) and qubchur (regular taxes)—demanded goods like , silver, , cloth, and falcons from states, funding elite consumption and campaigns without fully transitioning Mongols to agrarian taxation. To bolster production, Mongol rulers implemented policies relocating skilled artisans from conquered regions, such as textile workers, jewelers, architects, and stone carvers from and the , to Mongol centers for constructing palaces and manufacturing luxury items, thereby centralizing crafts and disseminating techniques across the empire. In the (1271–1368), standardized paper currency (chao) around 1260, backed initially by silver reserves under a precious metal standard, enabling efficient tax collection in monetized form and facilitating bulk transactions that reduced reliance on cumbersome coinage or barter. However, excessive issuance without sufficient backing contributed to by the dynasty's later decades, undermining fiscal stability. The (c. 1241–1368) secured overland trade routes spanning , reviving the by eliminating banditry through relay stations (yam) and uniform tariffs, with major paths diverging in into southern, central, and northern branches connecting to the and . Goods exchanged included , , and spices eastward, and horses, furs, and metals westward, with maritime extensions via ports amplifying volume, though precise quantification remains elusive due to fragmented records. These networks introduced promissory notes and mechanisms, lowering transaction costs and sustaining post-empire. Long-term, Mongol facilitation of secure routes and financial innovations spurred Eurasian by integrating fragmented markets, evidenced by sustained Silk Road activity into the and precedents for later global systems, despite initial disruptions from conquests. This integration outlasted the , embedding pastoral surplus into broader exchange circuits that enhanced regional specialization.

Culture and Religion

Traditional shamanism and spiritual practices

The traditional spiritual practices of the Mongols were rooted in Tengrism, a shamanistic and animistic system that privileged Tengri, the supreme sky god embodying the eternal blue heavens, as the ultimate arbiter of natural cycles critical to steppe pastoralism. This focus on Tengri arose from the nomads' dependence on predictable weather for livestock survival and mobility across vast, open terrains, where clear skies facilitated herding and obscured ones portended hardship or conflict. Rituals directed to Tengri included animal sacrifices, often horses or sheep, conducted at elevated sites or during seasonal gatherings to invoke favorable conditions for rain, grass growth, and military success. Integral to this framework were ongon cults, involving of localized spirits—typically ancestors, deceased shamans, or guardians—embodied in crafted objects such as effigies, amulets, or bundles of cloth and bone, which shamans ritually activated to these entities. Ongon served practical functions like warding off , ensuring hunt yields, or protecting clans, with their placement near water sources, mountains, or hearths underscoring a causal recognition that appeasing environmental and lineage-linked forces sustained ecological balance and social cohesion. Shamans, termed böö or kam, functioned as pivotal mediators, inducing trance via drumming, chanting, or hallucinogens to commune with Tengri and ongon, thereby enabling divination for high-stakes decisions in warfare, migration, or leadership disputes. Techniques encompassed scapulimancy—reading cracks in heated sheep shoulder bones—or observing bird flights and dreams as omens, providing interpretive tools grounded in observable patterns to mitigate risks in an unpredictable nomadic existence. Healers among them addressed ailments attributed to spirit disequilibrium through exorcisms or soul-retrieval rites, emphasizing empirical correlations between ritual intervention and recovery outcomes. These practices demonstrated resilience, coexisting with and influencing subsequent faiths; shamanic invocations of Tengri and ongon endured in syncretic forms within rural Mongolian communities, evident in ovoo cairn offerings and folk healing persisting beyond the 16th-century Buddhist influx.

Adoption of Buddhism, Islam, and other religions

Kublai Khan, founder of the Yuan dynasty, pragmatically patronized Tibetan Buddhism to consolidate control over Tibet and integrate diverse subjects, appointing Sakya lama Drogön Chögyal Phagpa as imperial preceptor in 1270 and establishing the Bureau of Buddhist and Tibetan Affairs in 1264 to oversee Tibetan administration. This patronage elevated Buddhism's institutional role within the empire, fostering a priest-patron relationship that influenced Mongol religious syncretism while maintaining shamanistic elements. In the western Mongol khanates, Islam gained traction through elite conversions driven by alliances and governance needs. Ghazan Khan of the Ilkhanate converted to Sunni Islam on June 16, 1295, under the influence of advisor Nawrūz, establishing it as the state religion and initiating widespread Islamization among the ruling class and subjects. Similarly, in the Golden Horde, Berke Khan became the first Mongol ruler to adopt Islam around 1257, with Özbeg Khan formalizing it as the dominant faith by 1313, aligning the khanate with Muslim populations in the Volga region and enhancing diplomatic ties. Nestorian Christianity, introduced among tribes like the Keraites and Naimans since the seventh century, persisted as a minority faith under Mongol religious tolerance, with communities flourishing in Central Asia during the empire's peak but declining as Buddhism and Islam dominated post-fragmentation khanates. Syncretic practices blended these influences, as Mongol rulers selectively adopted elements for political utility without fully abandoning ancestral shamanism. Following the Yuan collapse, Tibetan Buddhism reemerged in Mongolia during the 16th century, solidified by Altan Khan's 1578 conversion and alliance with the Third Dalai Lama, leading to institutional dominance. By the early 20th century, approximately 767 monasteries operated with 75,000 to 100,000 lamas, controlling significant economic and political resources until Soviet-influenced purges in the 1930s reduced their numbers to 251 by 1940.

Arts, oral traditions, and material culture

The Secret History of the Mongols, composed in stages around 1228 and 1240, serves as the earliest surviving Mongolian literary work, originally transmitted orally before being recorded in Mongolian script, detailing the ancestry, rise, and conquests of Genghis Khan up to the early reign of Ögedei Khan. This chronicle blends historical narrative with genealogical accounts, reflecting the Mongol emphasis on heroic lineage and tribal alliances central to their nomadic society. Oral epics known as tuuli form a core of Mongolian tradition, comprising lengthy heroic tales recited by bards (uyanga) that invoke benedictions, eulogies, and moral lessons, often spanning hundreds to thousands of lines and performed during rituals or gatherings. These epics, preserved through generations post-empire, include adaptations like the late-16th-century incorporation of the Tibetan Gesar of Ling cycle, emphasizing knightly valor, romances, and struggles against foes, which sustained cultural identity amid political fragmentation. Throat singing, or khöömei, originated in western Mongolia's Altai region among herders, involving simultaneous production of drone and overtone notes to imitate natural sounds like wind, flowing water, and animal calls, a technique tied to pastoral monitoring of livestock and environment. This vocal art, practiced by ethnic groups such as the Khalkha and Altay, underscores the auditory minimalism of nomadic life, where multifunctional skills adapted to vast steppes without reliance on instruments. Material culture prioritized portability and utility, evident in felt production from sheep, goat, camel, horse, and yak wool, processed by cleaning, beating, layering, wetting, and rolling to create durable coverings for yurts (gers), clothing, and rugs essential for seasonal migrations. Yurts, framed with wooden lattices and topped by a crown pole, embodied this functional aesthetic, disassembling for transport by horse or camel while providing insulation against extreme climates. Rock art, including Bronze Age deer stones—tall slabs etched with flying deer motifs, human figures, and symbols from circa 1000 BCE—alongside petroglyphs depicting hunts and herding scenes, persisted as markers of sacred landscapes in Mongolia's khirigsuur burial complexes, reflecting continuity in pastoral symbolism despite empire's rise. These minimalist engravings, concentrated in sites like the Khoid Tamir valley, avoided elaboration due to nomadic constraints, prioritizing symbolic endurance over permanence. Post-imperial revivals maintained epic traditions orally, with tuuli bards adapting narratives to local khanates, ensuring transmission of motifs like trusty steeds and marital alliances amid 14th-17th century disruptions, though written forms waned until 19th-century collections. This oral resilience mirrored material sparsity, where forms favored evanescence suited to mobility over static monuments.

Language

Mongolian language family and dialects

The Mongolic languages constitute a small but cohesive language family, comprising around eight to ten living languages spoken by approximately 6 million people, primarily in Mongolia, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China, and parts of Russia such as Buryatia and Kalmykia. These languages exhibit agglutinative morphology, with suffixes marking grammatical relations, and a typical subject-object-verb word order. Proto-Mongolic, reconstructed from historical records dating to the 13th century, featured a seven-vowel system and initial consonant clusters that have partially simplified in modern varieties. The family is classified into eastern and western branches, with the eastern group including Khalkha (the basis for standard Mongolian) and Buryat, while the western encompasses Oirat dialects; additional peripheral languages like Dagur and Monguor show greater divergence due to prolonged contact with non-Mongolic neighbors. Khalkha Mongolian, the prestige dialect spoken by over 5.7 million people in Mongolia, serves as the standard literary language and is characterized by advanced tongue root (ATR) vowel harmony, where non-high vowels harmonize for pharyngealization, and high vowels follow suit, though loanwords often disrupt this pattern. Oirat variants, including Kalmyk (spoken by about 165,000 in Russia's European steppes), preserve archaic features like initial /x/ sounds (from Proto-Mongolic *k-) and exhibit labial vowel harmony alongside ATR effects, distinguishing them phonologically from eastern dialects. Buryat, with around 500,000 speakers in southern Siberia, incorporates Russian loanwords affecting up to 20% of its lexicon, while Dagur in northeastern China retains conservative consonantism but shows Chagatai Turkic influences. Mutual intelligibility varies: central dialects like Khalkha, Chakhar, and Khorchin (in Inner Mongolia) form a continuum with high comprehension, but Oirat speakers typically understand only 40-60% of Khalkha without adaptation, due to lexical gaps and phonological mismatches such as Oirat's retention of word-final vowels. Buryat and peripheral languages like Monguor exhibit even lower intelligibility with core Mongolian, often requiring bilingualism for communication. Vocabulary includes substantial loanwords—Persian and Arabic terms from the Mongol Empire era (e.g., administrative words like yam for postal relay), Chinese borrowings in Inner Mongolian varieties (up to 10% in some dialects), and Russian elements in Buryat—many of which resist vowel harmony, reflecting historical conquests and trade rather than genetic inheritance. The proposed inclusion of Mongolic in a broader Altaic macrofamily with Turkic and Tungusic languages relies on typological parallels like vowel harmony and agglutination, but lacks robust cognate evidence or regular sound correspondences, leading most contemporary linguists to treat it as an areal phenomenon from prolonged contact rather than shared ancestry.

Scripts and linguistic evolution

The Mongols adopted a writing system derived from the Old Uyghur script in 1204, shortly after Temüjin (Genghis Khan) unified the tribes and defeated the Naimans, capturing Uyghur scribes who adapted it for Mongolian phonology to serve administrative needs in the emerging empire. This vertical, left-to-right alphabet, known as the traditional or classical Mongolian script (Hudum Mongol bichig), enabled the transcription of laws, decrees, and historical records, such as the Secret History of the Mongols compiled around 1240, facilitating governance across diverse conquered territories. The script's adaptation prioritized practicality for nomadic bureaucracy, with modifications to distinguish Mongolian vowels and consonants absent in Uyghur. Under Kublai Khan, who founded the Yuan dynasty in 1271, the Phags-pa script was commissioned around 1269 from the Tibetan monk Drogön Chögyal Phagpa as an imperial experiment to unify writing for multiple languages, including Mongolian, Chinese, Tibetan, and others, in vertical square-block form inspired by Tibetan and Sanskrit models. Intended for official Yuan administration and coinage, it saw limited use—primarily in edicts, seals, and passports—before falling into disuse after Kublai's death in 1294 due to its complexity and resistance from established scribes favoring the traditional script. This innovation reflected causal pressures for multilingual standardization in a vast, multi-ethnic empire but failed to displace the Uyghur-derived system, which persisted in Mongol successor states like the Northern Yuan (1368–1635). In Outer Mongolia, the traditional script endured until the 1940s, when Soviet influence prompted adoption of a Cyrillic-based alphabet with two extra letters (for sounds like /ө/ and /ү/) to boost literacy rates and integrate with Russian orthography, fully implemented by 1946 amid communist reforms. Inner Mongolia retained the traditional script under Chinese administration, preserving it for cultural and administrative continuity. Linguistic evolution maintained Mongolian's core Mongolic features—agglutinative grammar, vowel harmony, and SOV syntax—despite extensive Turkic lexical borrowings from prolonged steppe interactions (e.g., terms for pastoralism and warfare), as geographic proximity and khanate mergers introduced loans without altering foundational structure or phonology. Contemporary Mongolia mandates dual-script use from January 2025, promoting traditional script in education, signage, and digital interfaces alongside Cyrillic to reclaim cultural heritage post-Soviet era, though Cyrillic dominates daily literacy due to entrenched infrastructure. This revival counters historical Russification while navigating Cyrillic's efficiency for modern Khalkha dialect standardization, ensuring script evolution aligns with national identity amid preserved linguistic distinctiveness from Turkic neighbors.

Genetics and Physical Anthropology

Key genetic markers and haplogroups

The Y-chromosomal haplogroup C2-M217 (including its subclades) predominates among Mongolic-speaking populations, serving as a founding paternal lineage with average frequencies of approximately 51% across sampled groups, though varying by subgroup and region such as higher prevalence in northern Mongolian clans. This marker reflects deep East Asian paternal origins, with subclade diversity indicating local expansions rather than singular elite-driven dissemination in core populations. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) profiles in Mongols are overwhelmingly East Asian in composition, encompassing macro-haplogroups such as A, B, C, D, F, G, and M7, which align with northern East Eurasian lineages and exhibit high haplotype diversity (e.g., 0.993 in related Daur samples). These maternal markers underscore minimal Western Eurasian introgression in maternal lines, consistent with endogenous steppe continuity. Autosomal genome-wide data reveal that Mongolians derive the majority of their ancestry from Eastern Eurasian sources, primarily two components enriched in northern East Asians and Sino-Tibetan speakers, with limited Western admixture beyond trace levels in peripheral groups. A 2024 study of Han populations on the Mongolian Plateau documented admixture with local Mongol-like ancestries, resulting in genetic homogeneity among plateau Han relative to lowland counterparts, indicative of historical gene flow shaping regional profiles. Steppe pastoral adaptations in Mongols include cultural processing of dairy (e.g., fermentation into kumis) to enable lactose digestion, as genetic lactase persistence alleles remain rare (frequencies near 0% in East Asians, including Mongols), contrasting with LP selection in European pastoralists and highlighting non-genetic mechanisms for dairy reliance.

Evidence of admixture and population history

Genomic analyses of ancient and modern Mongol samples reveal a primary Northeast Asian ancestry component, with detectable admixtures from southern East Asian populations predating the Mongol Empire. This southern influence, estimated through admixture proportions in autosomal DNA, likely stems from interactions along the eastern steppe fringes, contributing 10-20% to certain Mongol groups' genomes. Historic Mongols, including those from the 13th-14th centuries, are modeled as deriving from a three-way admixture involving Slab Grave culture proxies and earlier eastern steppe sources, with minimal western Eurasian input until empire-era expansions. Admixture dating via genomic linkage disequilibrium places major gene flow events between 600 and 1,000 years ago, aligning with the Mongol conquests that dispersed Northeast Asian lineages across Eurasia. These expansions introduced Mongol-derived ancestry into distant populations, as evidenced by elevated East Asian signals in medieval Central Asian and European remains, though reciprocal admixture into core Mongol groups remained limited. A 2025 analysis of Golden Horde elites from Kazakhstan confirms their predominant Ancient Northeast Asian heritage, with supplementary components from local steppe pastoralists indicating elite-mediated gene flow during the 13th-14th centuries, but no dominant western shifts. Population history reconstructions using genomic clocks highlight bottlenecks in proto-Mongol lineages around 2,000-3,000 years ago, followed by exponential expansions tied to the 13th-century empire formation, as inferred from coalescent-based effective population size trajectories. Subgroup differentiation, such as between Buryats and Khalkha, arises from heterogeneous admixture post-bottleneck: Buryats exhibit heightened Siberian hunter-gatherer affinity and greater genetic distance from southern East Asians, while Khalkha retain closer ties to central steppe cores with elevated mtDNA diversity reflecting localized expansions. These patterns underscore causal links between empire-driven migrations and the structuring of Mongol genetic variation, independent of later regional isolations.

Y-chromosomal legacy of Genghis Khan and elites

A genetic analysis published in examined Y-chromosome short tandem repeats (STRs) across 16 Asian populations and identified a specific within C2 (formerly designated C3*), known as the "star-cluster," shared by approximately 8% of sampled males, equating to roughly 0.5% of the global male population at the time. The estimated time to (TMRCA) for this lineage was calculated at around 1,000 years , coinciding with the founding of the in the early , prompting attribution to patrilineal descendants of or contemporaneous elites who benefited from the empire's conquests and . Subsequent whole-Y chromosome sequencing of 34 C2*-star-cluster samples in 2018 refined the phylogeny and TMRCA to approximately 2,100 years ago (with a 95% confidence interval of 1,700–3,400 years), indicating the lineage predates Genghis Khan and traces to ordinary prehistoric Mongol populations rather than an exclusive royal patriline. This analysis, incorporating ancient DNA comparisons, suggested the observed expansion resulted from multiple founding males among Mongol khans and elites during the 13th–14th centuries, rather than a singular progenitor like Genghis, debunking claims of direct descent from him alone for the majority of carriers. Frequencies remain highest (up to 20–30%) in Mongol-related groups like Kazakhs and Uzbeks but vary regionally, with lower prevalence in eastern Asia. Post-imperial dynamics, including the fragmentation of the Mongol successor states after the 14th century, correlate with a relative decline in the star-cluster's frequency in some conquered populations, as evidenced by comparative STR data showing reduced expansion rates after the empire's peak. This pattern aligns with historical records of elite purges and population displacements, tempering earlier estimates of unchecked propagation and highlighting the role of sustained political power in lineage persistence.

Population and Distribution

Historical population estimates

Prior to Genghis Khan's unification of the tribes around 1206, the of the on the steppe is estimated at 700,000 to 1 million , primarily nomadic herders concentrated in what is now and adjacent regions. This base population sustained a core military of approximately 95,000 to 105,000 warriors by 1206, organized into decimal units (arban, jagun, mingghan, and tumen) drawn almost exclusively from ethnic Mongols, with each tumen comprising about 10,000 men. Later campaigns incorporated auxiliaries from subjugated peoples, expanding total forces to over 100,000 in major invasions, but the Mongol contingent remained the decisive core. The conquests from 1206 to the mid-14th century inflicted heavy demographic tolls on conquered territories, with scholarly estimates placing total deaths at around 40 million across Eurasia, including massive reductions in regions like the Khwarezmian Empire (up to 90% depopulation in some cities), northern China, and Kievan Rus'. These losses did not proportionally expand the Mongol ethnic population, which grew modestly through incorporation of allied tribes but stayed under 2 million at the empire's height, constrained by high warrior attrition, internal conflicts, and nomadic lifestyles ill-suited to sedentary demographic booms. In the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368), official censuses recorded broader imperial populations exceeding 80 million by the 14th century, encompassing Han Chinese, Central Asians, and others under Mongol rule, but the ethnic Mongol and closely affiliated groups numbered far less, likely 1–1.5 million, serving as elites and garrisons amid the vast subject populations. Fragmentation into successor khanates after 1368 led to further declines, with internecine wars and losses to plagues reducing core Mongol numbers in the Mongolian heartland.

Modern demographics and subgroups

The total population of ethnic Mongols worldwide is approximately 10 million as of 2025 projections. In independent , the population stands at about 3.5 million, with ethnic Mongols forming over 95% of the total and exhibiting an growth rate of 1.27%. Within , the Khalkha subgroup predominates, comprising roughly 85% of the populace, or around 3 million individuals, according to ethnic breakdowns from national surveys. Other subgroups in include smaller Oirat-derived groups like the Dörvöd (2.4%) and Bayad (1.7%), alongside non-Mongol minorities such as (3.9%). In China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous , ethnic Mongols number about 4.5 million, representing 17-19% of the region's 24 million as per 2020 extrapolated to 2025. This , often referred to as Southern Mongols, includes Chahar, Tumet, and other historical divisions, though Han Chinese migration has diluted their proportional presence since the mid-20th century. Growth rates here lag behind Mongolia's due to lower fertility and assimilation pressures, with overall regional population increases driven more by Han inflows than Mongol expansion. Oirat Mongols, a western , persist in diaspora communities, notably the in Russia's , totaling around 180,000-200,000 individuals. Their rate hovers at approximately 1.72 births per , below the replacement threshold of 2.1, reflecting broader demographic challenges in post-Soviet ethnic enclaves despite cultural retention of Buddhist and nomadic elements. Smaller Oirat populations exist in (e.g., Dörbet, Torgut) and , but these have integrated into larger Mongol identities. Rapid urbanization across Mongol-inhabited areas has accelerated the erosion of traditional nomadism, with Mongolia's urban population surging from 58% in 1990 to nearly 70% by the early 2020s, prompting annual migrations of tens of thousands of herders to Ulaanbaatar amid dzud winters and economic shifts. This trend, fueled by mining booms and climate variability, has reduced practicing pastoralists to under 30% of Mongolia's households, fostering ger districts on urban fringes while subgroups like Khalkha adapt through hybrid livelihoods. In Inner Mongolia, similar sedentarization tied to state policies has confined many to townships, diminishing seasonal migrations.

Geographic distribution by region

The largest population of ethnic Mongols resides in Mongolia, where they comprise approximately 95% of the roughly 3.5 million inhabitants as of 2025, predominantly Khalkha subgroups concentrated in urban centers like and rural regions. In , the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region hosts the second-largest group, with about 6 million Mongols amid a total regional exceeding 25 million, though their proportion has declined due to Han Chinese migration and policies emphasizing Mandarin over Mongolian in and administration, prompting localized protests in 2020 over curriculum shifts. In Russia, Mongol-related ethnic groups form notable minorities: Buryats number around 461,000, primarily in the Republic of Buryatia adjacent to Mongolia, where they constitute about 30% of the nearly 1 million residents; Kalmyks, an Oirat subgroup, total approximately 183,000 and form the majority (over 60%) in the Republic of Kalmykia, a distinct steppe enclave on the European side of the Caspian Sea established by 17th-century migrations. Smaller Mongol communities persist along tri-border areas, including Kazakh and Evenki-admixed groups in Russia's Altai Republic and China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, totaling under 100,000 collectively. Post-1990s economic transitions spurred a diaspora of tens of thousands, with about 30,000 Mongols in the United States—concentrated in cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and Denver via student and labor visas—and smaller communities in Europe, including several thousand in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Sweden, often driven by education, mining opportunities, or asylum from regional instability. Worldwide, Mongols number around 10 million, with core regions accounting for over 90% and diaspora growth reflecting urbanization and global mobility rather than large-scale displacement.

Conquests, Impacts, and Legacy

Military innovations and achievements

The Mongol armies under Genghis Khan and his successors achieved unparalleled conquests through tactical innovations emphasizing mobility, coordination, and adaptability, resulting in the largest contiguous land empire in history, encompassing roughly 24 million square kilometers by the late 13th century. Central to their success was the use of light cavalry archers equipped with composite recurve bows, which allowed warriors to maintain high speeds while delivering accurate volleys, often in the form of arrow storms that disrupted enemy formations. Each Mongol horseman typically managed three to five horses, enabling sustained marches of up to 100 kilometers per day and rapid maneuvers that outpaced sedentary armies. Logistical innovations, particularly the yam relay system established under Ögedei Khan around 1235, facilitated empire-wide communication and supply chains by placing stations every 25 to 40 miles, where couriers and armies could exchange exhausted horses for fresh ones, food, and shelter. This network not only supported military campaigns by ensuring timely intelligence and reinforcements but also allowed Mongol forces to project power across diverse terrains, from the Gobi Desert to the Carpathian Mountains, without being encumbered by lengthy supply trains. Their adaptability extended to incorporating auxiliary troops and technologies from conquered peoples, such as Persian and Chinese engineers for constructing trebuchets and other siege engines during assaults on fortified cities. Tactical doctrines featured feigned retreats, where disciplined units simulated routs to lure overconfident pursuers into ambushes, followed by encirclement and annihilation, as demonstrated in battles against the Jin dynasty. Psychological warfare amplified these maneuvers; the Mongols cultivated a reputation for swift, decisive retribution against resistance, often prompting preemptive surrenders that minimized prolonged engagements and conserved resources. In siege warfare, they integrated gunpowder-based incendiaries and bombs, first employed extensively during the 1232-1233 siege of Kaifeng, marking an early adoption of Chinese pyrotechnic technology to breach walls and demoralize defenders. This pragmatic assimilation of foreign expertise and emphasis on reconnaissance via spies ensured Mongol forces could tailor strategies to specific environments, from open steppes favoring hit-and-run tactics to urban sieges requiring engineering prowess.

Destruction, death toll, and demographic consequences

The Mongol conquests from 1206 to 1368 resulted in an estimated 30 to 60 million deaths across , equivalent to roughly 10-15% of the global population of approximately 400 million at the time, based on extrapolations from regional chronicles and demographic reconstructions. These figures derive primarily from Persian, Chinese, and historical accounts detailing massacres, though modern historians caution that numbers may include indirect fatalities from and , with some contemporary reports potentially inflated for rhetorical effect. The invasions' scale exceeded that of most pre-modern conflicts, driven by systematic policies of terror to compel surrenders without prolonged sieges. Specific campaigns exemplified deliberate genocidal tactics against resistant populations. During the 1221 siege of , one of the largest cities in the world with an estimated 500,000-1 million inhabitants, Mongol forces under Khan reportedly executed over 1.3 million people over a week, according to the Persian chronicler , leaving the city ruins uninhabited for centuries. Similar annihilations occurred at (1.7 million claimed killed in 1221) and during the 1258 sack of , where up to 800,000-2 million perished amid the destruction of the Abbasid Caliphate's systems, per accounts by and other Muslim historians. These acts targeted civilians, artisans, and elites to eradicate potential rebellion, often sparing only select craftsmen for enslavement or relocation. Demographic repercussions included severe depopulation in core conquered regions, with Central Asia's urban centers like the oases losing 75-90% of their populations, leading to abandoned farmlands and collapsed trade networks that induced famines. In , the conquest of the Jin and dynasties (1234-1279) halved northern populations through warfare, displacement, and epidemics, while Eastern Europe's Kievan Rus' saw villages and towns reduced by half in the 1237-1242 invasions. This vacuum persisted for generations, with slower recovery in arid zones due to disrupted and nomadic supplanting settled farming. Indirect environmental effects stemmed from the human toll, as widespread depopulation enabled forest regrowth on abandoned agricultural lands across Eurasia, sequestering approximately 700 million metric tons of atmospheric CO2 between 1200 and 1400—comparable to modern annual fossil fuel emissions from gasoline. Modeling studies attribute this to reduced deforestation pressures in regions like northern China and the Eurasian steppes, though the climatic impact was minor compared to natural variability. Such regrowth underscores the causal link between mass mortality and ecosystem rebound, countering narratives that downplay the invasions' scale by emphasizing later stabilizations.

Facilitation of cultural and technological exchanges

The Mongol Empire's establishment of the Pax Mongolica, spanning roughly the 13th and early 14th centuries, created a period of relative stability across Eurasia by suppressing banditry and enforcing safe passage along trade routes like the Silk Road, thereby increasing the volume and security of overland commerce. This security enabled merchants to travel vast distances without the customary risks of robbery or tribal interference, fostering growth in cities along the routes and the exchange of commodities such as silk, spices, porcelain, and textiles between China, Central Asia, Persia, and Europe. The empire's yam postal relay system further supported this by allowing rapid communication and the movement of officials, diplomats, and traders, which indirectly boosted commercial networks. Technological diffusion occurred through these networks, with Chinese innovations in —particularly woodblock techniques—spreading westward via Mongol patronage and intermediaries like Uighurs and Tibetans under the . In astronomy, Mongol rulers facilitated collaboration between Chinese, Persian, and Muslim scholars; for instance, under , Kitan astronomer integrated Chinese and Islamic methods, while Hülegü Khan's court in 13th-century Persia hosted Chinese astronomers who contributed to the Observatory's advancements in planetary models. These exchanges were enabled by the empire's policy of relocating skilled artisans and scholars across khanates, though the Mongols themselves contributed little original scholarship due to their nomadic traditions and limited adoption of literacy beyond administrative needs. Diplomatic and cultural networks under Mongol rule further promoted exchanges by standardizing practices like the use of paiza (imperial passes) for safe conduct, which allowed envoys, missionaries, and traders—such as European figures like Marco Polo—to traverse the empire, carrying ideas on religion, medicine, and governance. This connectivity linked land and maritime Silk Roads, enabling the movement of Buddhist texts, Nestorian Christian doctrines, and Islamic scholarship, though such transfers relied heavily on pre-existing civilizations within the empire rather than Mongol innovation. The empire's tolerance for artisans and professionals, including exemptions from taxes for skilled workers, indirectly supported these interactions by preserving and relocating expertise from conquered regions.

Historiographical debates and modern perceptions

Historians have long debated the interpretation of Mongol conquests through contrasting primary sources. The Secret History of the Mongols, composed around 1240 in Mongolian vernacular, offers an internal perspective glorifying Genghis Khan as a unifier of tribes and architect of empire, emphasizing his strategic acumen and tribal legitimacy while downplaying atrocities against outsiders. In contrast, Persian chronicles such as Rashid al-Din's Jami' al-tawarikh (c. 1304–1316) and Chinese records like the Yuan Shi detail systematic devastation, including the razing of cities like Baghdad in 1258 and widespread massacres, portraying Mongols as agents of apocalyptic destruction driven by retribution and resource extraction. These external accounts, often from conquered literati, highlight a causal chain of terror—executions, pyramids of skulls, and forced surrenders—to compel submission, though their reliability is tempered by survivor bias and cultural animus toward nomadic invaders. A central historiographical tension pits the "destroyer" narrative against the "unifier and innovator" view. Traditional Western and Islamic scholarship, drawing on Persian and European eyewitnesses, frames Mongol expansion as barbaric irruptions that depopulated regions and regressed civilizations, with estimates of 40 million deaths underscoring indiscriminate violence as a core tactic rather than aberration. Revisionist interpretations, notably Jack Weatherford's 2004 analysis, recast Genghis as a meritocratic lawgiver who fostered Pax Mongolica, enabling Eurasian trade and cultural diffusion via the empire's postal system and religious tolerance, arguing that destruction was pragmatic deterrence against prolonged sieges rather than gratuitous savagery. Critics of such sanitized portrayals contend they underweight empirical evidence of intentional demographic collapse—e.g., Iran's population halving post-invasion—and overstate administrative benevolence, attributing positive outcomes more to assimilated local bureaucracies than Mongol intent. The debate hinges on causal realism: terror's efficiency in conquering vast territories without permanent occupation suggests strategic calculus, yet its scale implies a worldview equating resistance with existential threat, blurring lines between calculated policy and cultural ruthlessness. Twentieth-century nationalist movements revived Mongol heritage amid decolonization and anti-communist shifts. In interwar Inner Mongolia, intellectuals invoked to forge pan-Mongol identity against Chinese assimilation, blending imperial nostalgia with autonomy claims, though suppressed by Japanese and later communist forces. Post-1990 democratic Mongolia witnessed a deliberate rehabilitation, erecting statues and renaming Ulaanbaatar's main square after Genghis by 2013, framing him as proto-democratic for his kurultai assemblies and anti-feudal meritocracy, countering Soviet-era erasure that deemed him a feudal relic. This revival, fueled by economic nationalism and tourism, selectively emphasizes unification over conquests, yet faces critique for romanticizing a history of subjugation. Contemporary perceptions diverge sharply by region. In Mongolia, Genghis commands near-sacrosanct status as nation-founder, with public reverence—e.g., Naadam festivals and naming—rooted in ethnic and resilience narratives, viewing global critiques as Orientalist . Internationally, especially in conquest zones like and , he symbolizes genocidal , with sporadic calls for amid broader recognition of imperial atrocities, though academic trends lean toward balanced assessments acknowledging both terror's and empire's integrative . Western popular media often amplifies barbarism via and , while revisionist works challenge this by quantifying booms (e.g., volume tripling), prompting debates on whether modern source biases—e.g., progressive academia minimizing pre-modern violence—parallel medieval ones.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.