Hubbry Logo
Operation CrossroadsOperation CrossroadsMain
Open search
Operation Crossroads
Community hub
Operation Crossroads
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Operation Crossroads
Operation Crossroads
from Wikipedia

Operation Crossroads
Operation Crossroads test detonations of Able (top) and Baker (bottom).
Map
Information
CountryUnited States
Test siteNE Lagoon, Bikini Atoll
Period1946
Number of testsTwo tested and one cancelled.
Test typeFree fall air drop, Underwater
Max. yield22–23 kilotonnes of TNT (92–96 TJ)
Test series chronology

Operation Crossroads was a pair of nuclear weapon tests conducted by the United States at Bikini Atoll in mid-1946. They were the first nuclear weapon tests since Trinity on July 16, 1945, and the first detonations of nuclear devices since the atomic bombing of Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. The purpose of the tests was to investigate the effect of nuclear weapons on warships.

The Crossroads tests were the first of many nuclear tests held in the Marshall Islands and the first to be publicly announced beforehand and observed by an invited audience, including a large press corps. They were conducted by Joint Army/Navy Task Force One, headed by Vice Admiral William H. P. Blandy rather than by the Manhattan Project, which had developed nuclear weapons during World War II. A fleet of 95 target ships was assembled in Bikini Lagoon and hit with two detonations of Fat Man plutonium implosion-type nuclear weapons of the kind dropped on Nagasaki in 1945, each with a yield of 23 kilotons of TNT (96 TJ).

The first test was Able. The bomb was named Gilda after Rita Hayworth's character in the 1946 film Gilda and was dropped from the B-29 Superfortress Dave's Dream of the 509th Bombardment Group on July 1, 1946. It detonated 520 feet (158 m) above the target fleet and caused less than the expected amount of ship damage because it missed its aim point by 2,130 feet (649 m).

The second test was Baker. The bomb was known as Helen of Bikini and was detonated 90 feet (27 m) underwater on July 25, 1946. Radioactive sea spray caused extensive contamination. A third deep-water test named Charlie was planned for 1947 but was canceled primarily because of the United States Navy's inability to decontaminate the target ships after the Baker test. Ultimately, only nine target ships were able to be scrapped rather than scuttled. Charlie was rescheduled as Operation Wigwam, a deep-water shot conducted in 1955 off the coast of Mexico (Baja California).

Bikini's native residents were evacuated from the island on board the LST-861, with most moving to the Rongerik Atoll. In the 1950s, a series of large thermonuclear tests rendered Bikini unfit for subsistence farming and fishing because of radioactive contamination. Bikini remains uninhabited as of 2017, though it is occasionally visited by sport divers.

Planners attempted to protect participants in the Operation Crossroads tests against radiation sickness, but one study showed that the life expectancy of participants was reduced by an average of three months. The Baker test's radioactive contamination of all the target ships was the first case of immediate, concentrated radioactive fallout from a nuclear explosion. Chemist Glenn T. Seaborg, the longest-serving chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, called Baker "the world's first nuclear disaster."[1]

Background

[edit]

The first proposal to test nuclear weapons against naval warships was made on August 16, 1945, by Lewis Strauss, future chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission. In an internal memo to Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal, Strauss argued, "If such a test is not made, there will be loose talk to the effect that the fleet is obsolete in the face of this new weapon and this will militate against appropriations to preserve a postwar Navy of the size now planned."[2] With very few bombs available, he suggested a large number of targets widely dispersed over a large area. A quarter century earlier, in 1921, the Navy had suffered a public relations disaster when General Billy Mitchell's bombers sank every target ship the Navy provided for the Project B ship-versus-bomb tests.[3] The Strauss test would be designed to demonstrate ship survivability.[4]

Aerial photo of target ships anchored in a row at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.
Prospective Operation Crossroads target ships and support ships at Pearl Harbor on February 27, 1946. Ships from front to rear: USS Crittenden, Catron, Bracken, Burleson, Gilliam, Fallon, unknown ship, Fillmore, Kochab, Luna, and an unidentified tanker and Liberty ship. On the right are LSM-203 and LSM-465. Farther in the background are a floating drydock and a merchant ship hulk.

In August 1945, Senator Brien McMahon, who within a year would write the Atomic Energy Act and organize and chair the Congressional Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, made the first public proposal for such a test, but one designed to demonstrate the vulnerability rather than survivability of ships. He proposed dropping an atomic bomb on captured Japanese ships and suggested, "The resulting explosion should prove to us just how effective the atomic bomb is when used against the giant naval ships."[5] On September 19, the Chief of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF), General of the Army Henry H. Arnold, asked the Navy to set aside 10 of the 38 captured Japanese ships for use in the test proposed by McMahon.[6]

Meanwhile, the Navy proceeded with its own plan, which was revealed at a press conference on October 27 by the Commander in Chief, United States Fleet, Fleet Admiral Ernest King. It involved between 80 and 100 target ships, most of them surplus U.S. ships.[6] As the Army and the Navy maneuvered for control of the tests, Assistant Secretary of War Howard C. Peterson observed, "To the public, the test looms as one in which the future of the Navy is at stake ... if the Navy withstands [the tests] better than the public imagines it will, in the public mind the Navy will have 'won.'"[7]

The Army's candidate to direct the tests, Major General Leslie Groves, head of the Manhattan Project which built the bombs, did not get the job. The Joint Chiefs of Staff decided that because the Navy was contributing the most men and materiel, the test should be headed by a naval officer. Commodore William S. "Deak" Parsons was a naval officer who had worked on the Manhattan Project and participated in the bombing of Hiroshima.[8] He had been promoted to assistant to the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Special Weapons, Vice Admiral William H. P. Blandy,[9] whom Parsons proposed for the role. This recommendation was accepted, and on January 11, 1946, President Harry S. Truman appointed Blandy as head of Army/Navy Joint Task Force One (JTF-1), which was created to conduct the tests. Parsons became Deputy Task Force Commander for Technical Direction. USAAF Major General William E. Kepner was Deputy Task Force Commander for Aviation. Blandy codenamed the tests Operation Crossroads.[10][11]

Under pressure from the Army, Blandy agreed to crowd more ships into the immediate target area than the Navy wanted, but he refused USAAF Major General Curtis LeMay's demand that "every ship must have a full loading of oil, ammunition, and fuel."[12] Blandy's argument was that fires and internal explosions might sink ships that would otherwise remain afloat and be available for damage evaluation. When Blandy proposed an all-Navy board to evaluate the results, Senator McMahon complained to Truman that the Navy should not be "solely responsible for conducting operations which might well indeed determine its very existence."[13] Truman acknowledged that "reports were getting around that these tests were not going to be entirely on the level." He imposed a civilian review panel on Operation Crossroads to "convince the public it was objective."[14]

Opposition

[edit]

Pressure to cancel Operation Crossroads altogether came from scientists and diplomats. Manhattan Project scientists argued that further testing was unnecessary and environmentally dangerous. A Los Alamos study warned "the water near a recent surface explosion will be a witch's brew" of radioactivity.[15] When the scientists pointed out that the tests might demonstrate ship survivability while ignoring the effect of radiation on sailors,[16] Blandy responded by adding test animals to some of the ships, thereby generating protests from animal rights advocates.[17] J. Robert Oppenheimer declined an invitation to attend the test and wrote to President Truman about his objections to it, arguing that any data obtained from the test could be obtained more accurately and cheaply in a laboratory.[18]

Secretary of State James F. Byrnes, who a year earlier had told physicist Leo Szilard that a public demonstration of the bomb might make the Soviet Union "more manageable" in Europe,[19] now argued the opposite: that further display of U.S. nuclear power could harden the Soviet Union's position against acceptance of the Acheson–Lilienthal Plan, which discussed possible methods for the international control of nuclear weapons and the avoidance of future nuclear warfare. At a March 22 cabinet meeting he said, "from the standpoint of international relations it would be very helpful if the test could be postponed or never held at all."[20] He prevailed on Truman to postpone the first test for six weeks, from May 15 to July 1. For public consumption, the postponement was explained as an opportunity for more Congressional observers to attend during their summer recess.[21]

When Congressmen complained about the destruction of $450 million worth of target ships, Blandy replied that their true cost was their scrap value at $10 per ton, only $3.7 million.[22] Veterans and legislators from New York and Pennsylvania requested to keep their namesake battleships as museum ships, as Texas had done with USS Texas, but the JTF-1 replied that "it is regretted that such ships as the USS New York cannot be spared."[23]

Preparation

[edit]
Map of Bikini Atoll, with target area highlighted.
Map of Bikini Atoll and the target area for the tests.

A series of three tests was recommended to study the effects of nuclear weapons on ships, equipment, and materiel. The test site had to be in territory controlled by the United States. The inhabitants would have to be evacuated, so it was best if it was uninhabited, or nearly so, and at least 300 miles (500 km) from the nearest city. So that a B-29 Superfortress could drop a bomb, there had to be an airbase within 1,000 miles (1,600 km). To contain the target ships, it needed to have a protected anchorage at least 6 miles (10 km) wide. Ideally, it would have predictable weather patterns and be free of severe cold and violent storms. Predictable winds would avoid having radioactive material blown back on the task force personnel, and predictable ocean currents would allow material to be kept away from shipping lanes, fishing areas, and inhabited shores.[24] Timing was critical because Navy manpower required to move the ships was being released from active duty as part of the post-World War II demobilization, and civilian scientists knowledgeable about atomic weapons were leaving federal employment for college teaching positions.[25]

On January 24, Blandy named the Bikini Lagoon as the site for the two 1946 detonations, Able and Baker. The deep underwater test, Charlie, scheduled for early 1947, would take place in the ocean west of Bikini.[26] Of the possible places given serious consideration, including Ecuador's Galápagos Islands,[27] Bikini offered the most remote location with a large protected anchorage, suitable but not ideal weather,[28] and a small, easily moved population. It had come under exclusive United States control on January 15, when Truman declared the United States to be the sole trustee of all the Pacific islands captured from Japan during the war. The Navy had been studying test sites since October 1945 and was ready to announce its choice of Bikini soon after Truman's declaration.[29] On February 6, the survey ship Sumner began blasting channels through the Bikini reef into the lagoon. The local residents were not told why.[30]

The 167 Bikini islanders first learned their fate four days later, on Sunday, February 10, when Navy Commodore Ben H. Wyatt, United States military governor of the Marshall Islands, arrived by seaplane from Kwajalein. Referring to Biblical stories which they had learned from Protestant missionaries, he compared them to "the children of Israel whom the Lord saved from their enemy and led into the Promised Land." He also claimed it was "for the good of mankind and to end all world wars." There was no signed agreement, but he reported by cable "their local chieftain, referred to as King Juda, arose and said that the natives of Bikini were very proud to be part of this wonderful undertaking."[31] On March 6, Wyatt attempted to stage a filmed reenactment of the February 10 meeting in which the Bikinians had given away their atoll. Despite repeated promptings and at least seven retakes, Juda confined his on-camera remarks to, "We are willing to go. Everything is in God's hands." The next day, LST-861 moved them and their belongings 128 miles (206 km) east to the uninhabited Rongerik Atoll, to begin a permanent exile.[32] Three Bikini families returned in 1974 but were evacuated again in 1978 because of radioactivity in their bodies from four years of eating contaminated food.[33] As of 2022, the atoll remains unpopulated.[34]

Ships

[edit]
View of the target fleet for test Able.

To make room for the target ships, 100 short tons (90 t) of dynamite were used to remove coral heads from Bikini Lagoon. On the grounds of the David Taylor Model Basin outside Washington, DC, dress rehearsals for Baker were conducted with dynamite and model ships in a pond named "Little Bikini."[35] A fleet of 93 target vessels was assembled in Bikini Lagoon. At the center of the target cluster, the density was 20 ships per square mile (7.7 per km2), three to five times greater than military doctrine would allow. The stated goal was not to duplicate a realistic anchorage but to measure damage as a function of distance from the blast center, at as many distances as possible.[36] The arrangement also reflected the outcome of the Army/Navy disagreement about how many ships should be allowed to sink.[37]

The target fleet included four obsolete U.S. battleships, two aircraft carriers, two cruisers, thirteen destroyers, eight submarines, forty landing ships, eighteen transports, two oilers, one floating drydock, and three surrendered Axis ships, the Japanese cruiser Sakawa, the battleship Nagato, and the German cruiser Prinz Eugen.[25] The ships carried sample amounts of fuel and ammunition, plus scientific instruments to measure air pressure, ship movement, and radiation. The live animals on some of the target ships[38] were supplied by the support ship USS Burleson, which brought 200 pigs, 60 guinea pigs, 204 goats, 5,000 rats, 200 mice, and grains containing insects to be studied for genetic effects by the National Cancer Institute.[25] Amphibious target ships were beached on Bikini Island.[39]

A support fleet of more than 150 ships provided quarters, experimental stations, and workshops for most of the 42,000 men (more than 37,000 of whom were Navy personnel) and the 37 female nurses.[40] Additional personnel were located on nearby atolls such as Eniwetok and Kwajalein. Navy personnel were allowed to extend their service obligation for one year if they wanted to participate in the tests and see an atomic bomb explode.[41] The islands of the Bikini Atoll were used as instrumentation sites and, until Baker contaminated them, as recreation sites.[42]

Cameras

[edit]
Crossroads-Able, 23 kilotons.

Radio-controlled autopilots were installed in eight B-17 bombers, converting them into remote-controlled drones which were then loaded with automatic cameras, radiation detectors, and air sample collectors. Their pilots operated them from mother planes at a safe distance from the detonations. The drones could fly into radiation environments, such as Able's mushroom cloud, which would have been lethal to crew members.[43] All the land-based detonation-sequence photographs were taken by remote control from tall towers erected on several islands of the atoll. In all, Bikini cameras took 50,000 still pictures and 1,500,000 feet (460,000 m) of motion picture film. One of the cameras could shoot 1,000 frames per second.[44]

Before the first test, all personnel were evacuated from the target fleet and Bikini Atoll. They boarded ships of the support fleet, which took safe positions at least 10 nautical miles (19 km) east of the atoll. Test personnel were issued special dark glasses to protect their eyes, but a decision was made shortly before Able that the glasses might not be adequate. Personnel were instructed to turn away from the blast, shut their eyes, and cradle their arm across their face for additional protection. A few observers who disregarded the recommended precautions advised the others when the bomb detonated. Most shipboard observers reported feeling a slight concussion and hearing a disappointing little "poom".[41]

The Able bomb, a Mark III 'Fat Man'-type nuclear bomb with its nickname 'Gilda' stenciled onto it, along with a photo of Rita Hayworth in the title role from the movie.

On July 26, 2016, the National Security Archive declassified and released the entire stock of footage shot by surveillance aircraft that flew over the nuclear test site just minutes after the bomb detonated.[45][46] The footage can be seen on YouTube.[47]

Nicknames

[edit]

Able and Baker are the first two letters of the Joint Army/Navy Phonetic Alphabet, used from 1941 until 1956. Alfa and Bravo are their counterparts in the current NATO phonetic alphabet. Charlie is the third letter in both systems. According to eyewitness accounts, the time of detonation for each test was announced as H or How hour;[48] in the official JTF-1 history, the term M or Mike hour is used instead.[49]

There were only seven nuclear bombs in existence in July 1946.[50] The two bombs used in the test were Fat Man plutonium implosion-type nuclear weapons of the kind dropped on Nagasaki. The Able bomb was stenciled with the name Gilda and decorated with an Esquire magazine photograph of Rita Hayworth, star of the 1946 movie, Gilda.[51] The Baker bomb was Helen of Bikini. This femme-fatale theme for nuclear weapons, combining seduction and destruction, is epitomized by the use in all languages, starting in 1946, of "bikini" as the name for a woman's two-piece bathing suit.[52]

United States' Crossroads series tests and detonations
Name Date, time (UTC) Location Elevation + height Delivery Purpose Device Yield Refer-
ences
Able June 30, 1946 21:00:01.0 NE Lagoon, Bikini Atoll 11°35′N 165°30′E / 11.59°N 165.50°E / 11.59; 165.50 (Able) 0 + 158 m (518 ft) Free fall
air drop
Weapon effect Mk III "Gilda" 23 kt [53][54][55][56][57]
Baker July 24, 1946 21:34:59.8 NE Lagoon, Bikini Atoll 11°35′N 165°31′E / 11.59°N 165.52°E / 11.59; 165.52 (Baker) 0 – 27.5 m (90 ft) Under-
water
Weapon effect Mk III "Helen of Bikini" 23 kt [53][54][57]
Charlie
(canceled)
March 1, 1947 NE Lagoon, Bikini Atoll 11°34′N 165°31′E / 11.57°N 165.51°E / 11.57; 165.51 (Charlie) 0 – 50 m (160 ft) Under-
water
Weapon effect Mk III 23 kt [57]

The United States' test series summary table is here: United States' nuclear testing series.

Test Able

[edit]
The airburst nuclear explosion of July 1, 1946. Photo taken from a tower on Bikini Island, 3.5 miles (5.6 km) away.
Gilda, the 23-kiloton air-deployed nuclear weapon detonated on July 1, 1946, during Crossroads Able

Detonation

[edit]
Nevada painted in high visibility orange for the atomic tests
The target fleet after test Able. The aircraft carrier Saratoga is right-center with Independence burning at left-center. The battleship Nagato is between them. The ship at left, next to the battleship Pennsylvania, is trying to wash down the radioactivity with water from the lagoon.

At 09:00 on July 1, 1946, Gilda was dropped from the B-29 Dave's Dream of the 509th Bombardment Group, piloted by Major Woodrow Swancutt under the command of Brigadier General Roger M. Ramey.[58] The plane, formerly known as Big Stink, had been the photographic equipment aircraft on the Nagasaki mission in 1945. It had been renamed in honor of Dave Semple, a bombardier who was killed during a practice mission on March 7, 1946.[59] Gilda detonated 520 feet (158 m) above the target fleet, with a yield of 23 kilotons. Five ships were sunk.[25][36] Two attack transports sank immediately, two destroyers within hours, and Sakawa the following day.[60]

Some of the 114 press observers expressed disappointment at the effect on ships.[61] The New York Times reported, prematurely, that "only two were sunk, one capsized, and eighteen damaged."[62] The next day, the Times carried an explanation by Forrestal that "heavily built and heavily armored ships are difficult to sink unless they sustain underwater damage."[63]

The main cause of less-than-expected ship damage was that the bomb missed its aim point by 710 yards (649 m).[64] The ship the bomb was aimed at failed to sink. The miss resulted in a government investigation of the flight crew of the B-29 bomber. Various explanations were offered, including the bomb's known poor ballistic characteristics, but none was convincing. Images of the drop were inconclusive. The bombsight was checked and found error free. Pumpkin bomb drops were conducted and were accurate. Colonel Paul W. Tibbets believed that the miss was caused by a miscalculation by the crew. The mystery was never solved.[65][66]

There were other factors that made Able less spectacular than expected. Observers were much farther away than at the Trinity test, and the high humidity absorbed much of the light and heat.[67]

The battleship USS Nevada, the only battleship to get underway at the Attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, had been designated as the aim point for Able and was painted orange, with white gun barrels and gunwales, to make her stand out in the central cluster of target ships. There were eight ships within 400 yards (366 m) of it. Had the bomb exploded over the Nevada as planned, at least nine ships, including two battleships and an aircraft carrier, likely would have sunk. The actual detonation point, west-northwest of the target, was closer to the attack transport USS Gilliam, in much less crowded water.[68]

Able Target array

[edit]
Map showing ship locations for the nuclear explosion of July 1, 1946. The locations of the 19 ships listed in the accompanying tables are marked with symbols and numbers.
The array of target ships in Bikini lagoon for the Able shot of Operation Crossroads. Half of the target ships were outside the area of this map. The five red X's mark the five ships that sank. The tables (right) contain the key to ship numbers. The circle, with a radius of 1,000 yards (914 m) from the point of detonation, outlines the area of serious ship damage. The intended bullseye for the bomb was ship #32, the battleship USS Nevada, which was painted orange to aid the bombardier. The bomb landed closer to ship #5, the attack transport USS Gilliam. All submarines were on the surface.
Location at which ships sank[69]
# Name Type Distance from zero
5 Gilliam Transport 50 yd (46 m)
9 Sakawa Cruiser 420 yd (380 m)
4 Carlisle Transport 430 yd (390 m)
1 Anderson Destroyer 600 yd (550 m)
6 Lamson Destroyer 760 yd (690 m)
Serious damage
# Name Type Distance from zero
40 Skate Submarine 400 yd (370 m)
12 YO-160 Yard oiler 520 yd (480 m)
28 Independence Aircraft carrier 560 yd (510 m)
22 Crittenden Transport 595 yd (544 m)
32 Nevada Battleship 615 yd (562 m)
3 Arkansas Battleship 620 yd (570 m)
35 Pensacola Cruiser 710 yd (650 m)
11 ARDC-13 Drydock 825 yd (754 m)
23 Dawson Transport 855 yd (782 m)
38 Salt Lake City Cruiser 895 yd (818 m)
27 Hughes Destroyer 920 yd (840 m)
37 Rhind Destroyer 1,012 yd (925 m)
49 LST-52 LST 1,530 yd (1,400 m)
10 Saratoga Aircraft carrier 2,265 yd (2,071 m)

In addition to the five ships that sank, fourteen were judged to have serious damage or worse, mostly as a result of the shock wave. All but three were located within 1,000 yards (900 m) of the detonation. Inside that radius, orientation to the bomb was a factor in shock wave impact. For example, ship #6, the destroyer USS Lamson, which sank, was farther away than seven ships that stayed afloat. Lamson was broadside to the blast, taking the full impact on her port side, while the seven closer ships were anchored with their sterns toward the blast, somewhat protecting the most vulnerable part of the hull.[70]

The only large ship inside the 1000-yard radius which sustained moderate rather than serious damage was the sturdily built Japanese battleship Nagato, ship #7, whose stern-on orientation to the bomb gave her some protection. Unrepaired damage from World War II may have complicated damage analysis. As the ship from which the Pearl Harbor attack had been commanded, Nagato was positioned near the aim point to guarantee her being sunk. The Able bomb missed its target, and the symbolic sinking came three weeks later, five days after the Baker shot.[71]

Fire caused serious damage to ship #10, the aircraft carrier Saratoga, more than 1 mile (1.6 km) from the blast. For test purposes, all the ships carried sample amounts of fuel and ordnance, plus airplanes. Most warships carried a seaplane on deck which could be lowered into the water by crane,[72] but Saratoga carried several airplanes with highly volatile aviation fuel, both on deck and in the hangars below. The fire was extinguished, and Saratoga was kept afloat for use in the Baker shot.[73][74]

Radiation

[edit]
Aerial view of the mushroom cloud.
Aerial view of the Able mushroom cloud rising from the lagoon with Bikini Island visible in the background. The cloud carried the radioactive contaminants into the stratosphere.

As with Little Boy (Hiroshima) and Fat Man (Nagasaki), the Crossroads Able shot was an air burst. These were purposely detonated high enough in the air to prevent surface materials from being drawn into the fireball. The height-of-burst for the Trinity test was 100 feet (30 m); the device was mounted on a tower. It made a crater 6 feet (1.8 m) deep and 500 feet (150 m) wide, and there was some local fallout. The test was conducted in secret, and the world at large learned nothing about the radioactive fallout at the time.[75] To be a true air burst with no local fallout, the Trinity height-of-burst needed to be 580 feet (180 m).[76] With an air burst, the radioactive fission products rise into the stratosphere and become part of the global, rather than the local, environment. Air bursts were officially described as "self-cleansing."[77] There was no significant local fallout from Able.[78]

There was an intense transitory burst of fireball radiation lasting a few seconds. Many of the closer ships received doses of neutron and gamma radiation that could have been lethal to anyone on the ship, but the ships did not become radioactive. Neutron activation of materials in the ships was judged to be a minor problem by the standards of the time. One sailor on the support ship USS Haven was found to be "sleeping in a shower of gamma rays" from an illegal metal souvenir he had taken from a target ship. Fireball neutrons had made it radioactive.[79] Within a day nearly all the surviving target ships had been reboarded. The ship inspections, instrument recoveries, and moving and remooring of ships for the Baker test proceeded on schedule.[80]

Test animals

[edit]

57 guinea pigs, 109 mice, 146 pigs, 176 goats, and 3,030 white rats had been placed on 22 target ships in stations normally occupied by people.[81] 35% of these animals died or were euthanised in the three months following the explosion: 10% were killed by the air blast, 15% were killed by radiation, and 10% were killed by the researchers as part of later study.[82] The most famous survivor was Pig #311, which was reportedly found swimming in the lagoon after the blast and was brought back to the National Zoo in Washington, DC.[83] The mysterious survival of Pig #311 caused some consternation at the time and has continued to be reported in error. However, an investigation pointed to the conclusion that it had neither swum in the ocean nor escaped the blast; it had likely been safely aboard an observation vessel during the test, thus "absent without leave" from its post on Sakawa and showing up about the same time other surviving pigs were captured.[84]

Two goats penned on ship deck, within reach of water and food.
Test animals were deliberately confined to the ships of Operation Crossroads. Goat #53, penned like this on Nevada's deck, died of radiation exposure two days after Able.[85]

The high rate of test animal survival was due in part to the nature of single-pulse radiation. As with the two Los Alamos criticality accidents involving the earlier demon core, victims who were close enough to receive a lethal dose died, while those farther away recovered and survived. Also, all the mice were placed outside the expected lethal zone in order to study possible mutations in future generations.[86]

Although Gilda missed its target Nevada by nearly half a mile (800 meters), and it failed to sink or to contaminate the battleship, a crew would not have survived. Goat #119, tethered inside a gun turret and shielded by armor plate, received enough fireball radiation to die four days later of radiation sickness having survived two days longer than goat #53, which was on the deck, unshielded.[87] Had Nevada been fully manned, she would likely have become a floating coffin, dead in the water for lack of a live crew. Two years later she was finished off by an aerial torpedo 105 kilometres (65 mi) southwest of Pearl Harbor on 31 July 1948. In theory, every unprotected location on the ship received 100 sieverts (10,000 rem) of initial nuclear radiation from the fireball.[76] Therefore, people deep enough inside the ship to experience a 90% radiation reduction would still have received a lethal dose of 10 sieverts (1,000 rem).[88] In the assessment of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists:[16]

"a large ship, about a mile away from the explosion, would escape sinking, but the crew would be killed by the deadly burst of radiations from the bomb, and only a ghost ship would remain, floating unattended in the vast waters of the ocean."

Photographic montage of the first few micro-seconds of the Able detonation, fireball and radiation effects.

Test Baker

[edit]
Crossroads-Baker detonation in slow-motion. LSM-60, which was anchored directly above the device, is completely destroyed.

Detonation

[edit]

In Baker on July 25, the weapon was suspended beneath landing craft LSM-60 anchored in the midst of the target fleet. Baker was detonated at 08:35,[25] 90 feet (27 m) underwater, halfway to the bottom in water 180 feet (55 m) deep. No identifiable part of LSM-60 was ever found; it was presumably vaporized by the nuclear fireball. Ten ships were sunk,[89] including the German heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen, which sank in December, five months after the test, because radioactivity prevented repairs to a leak in the hull.[90]

Photographs of Baker are unique among nuclear detonation pictures. The searing, blinding flash that usually obscures the target area took place underwater and was barely seen. The clear image of ships in the foreground and background gives a sense of scale. The large condensation cloud and the vertical water column are distinctive Baker shot features. One picture shows a mark where the 27,000-ton battleship USS Arkansas was.[91]

As with Able, any ships that remained afloat within 1,000 yards (900 m) of the detonation were seriously damaged, but this time the damage came from below, from water pressure rather than air pressure. The greatest difference between the two shots was the radioactive contamination of all the target ships by Baker. Regardless of the degree of damage, only nine surviving Baker target ships were eventually decontaminated and sold for scrap. The rest were sunk at sea after decontamination efforts failed.[92]

Baker Target array

[edit]
Map showing ship locations for the nuclear explosion of July 25, 1946. The locations of the 10 ships listed in the accompanying table are marked with symbols and numbers.
The array of target ships in Bikini lagoon for the Baker shot of Operation Crossroads. Half of the target ships were outside the area of this map. The ten red X's mark the ten ships that sank. The table (left) contains the key to ship numbers. The black circle, with a radius of 1,000 yards (914 m) from the point of detonation, outlines the area of serious ship damage. The blue circle, 330 yards (302 m) radius, marks the rim of the shallow underwater crater created by the blast, as well as the outer circumference of the hollow water column which enveloped Arkansas. The submarines were submerged: Pilotfish, ship #8, to a keel depth of 56 feet (17 m), Apogon, ship #2, to a keel depth of 100 feet (30 m), and Skipjack, ship #41, to 150 feet (46 m).
Ships sunk[93]
# Name Type Distance from zero to bow
50 LSM-60 Amphibious 0 yd (0 m)
3 Arkansas Battleship 259 yd (237 m)
8 Pilotfish Submarine 363 yd (332 m)
10 Saratoga Aircraft carrier 446 yd (408 m)
12 YO-160 Yard oiler 543 yd (497 m)
41 Skipjack Submarine 808 yd (739 m)
2 Apogon Submarine 846 yd (774 m)
7 Nagato Battleship 852 yd (779 m)
11 ARDC-13 Drydock 1,276 yd (1,167 m)

Prinz Eugen, ship #36, survived both the Able and Baker tests but was too radioactive to have leaks repaired. In September 1946 she was towed to Kwajalein Atoll, where she capsized in shallow water on December 22. She remains there today, with starboard propeller blades in the air.[94]

The submarine USS Skipjack was the only sunken ship successfully raised at Bikini.[95] She was towed to California and sunk again, as a target ship off the coast, two years later. [96]

Three other ships, all in sinking condition, were towed ashore at Bikini and beached:[97] attack transport USS Fallon, ship #25; destroyer USS Hughes, ship #27; and submarine USS Dentuda, ship #24. Dentuda, with her crew safely away from their submarine, being submerged (thus avoiding the base surge) and outside the 1000-yard circle, escaped serious contamination and hull damage and was successfully decontaminated, repaired, and briefly returned to service.[98][99][100]

Sequence of blast events

[edit]

The Baker shot produced so many unusual phenomena that a conference was held two months later to standardize nomenclature and define new terms for use in descriptions and analysis.[101] The underwater fireball took the form of a rapidly expanding hot gas bubble that pushed against the water, generating a supersonic hydraulic shock wave which crushed the hulls of nearby ships as it spread out. Eventually it slowed to the speed of sound in water, which is one mile per second (1,600 m/s), five times faster than that of sound in air.[102] On the surface, the shock wave was visible as the leading edge of a rapidly expanding ring of dark water, called the "slick" for its resemblance to an oil slick.[103] Close behind the slick was a visually more dramatic but less destructive whitening of the water surface called the "crack".[104]

When the gas bubble's diameter equaled the water depth, 180 feet (55 m), it hit the sea floor and the sea surface simultaneously. At the bottom, it created a shallow crater 30 feet (9 m) deep and 2,000 feet (610 m) wide.[105] At the top, it pushed the water above it into a "spray dome", which burst through the surface like a geyser. Elapsed time since detonation was four milliseconds.[106]

During the first full second, the expanding bubble removed all the water within a 500-foot (150 m) radius and lifted two million tons[107] of spray and seabed sand into the air. As the bubble rose at 2,500 feet per second (760 m/s),[108] it stretched the spray dome into a hollow cylinder or chimney of spray called the "column", 6,000 feet (1,800 m) tall and 2,000 feet (600 m) wide, with walls 300 feet (90 m) thick.[109]

As soon as the bubble reached the air, it started a supersonic atmospheric shock wave which, like the crack, was more visually dramatic than destructive. Brief low pressure behind the shock wave caused instant fog which shrouded the developing column in a "Wilson cloud", also called a "condensation cloud", obscuring it from view for two seconds. The Wilson cloud started out hemispherical, expanded into a disk which lifted from the water revealing the fully developed spray column, then expanded into a doughnut shape and vanished. The Able shot also produced a Wilson cloud, but heat from the fireball dried it out more quickly.[109]

By the time the Wilson cloud vanished, the top of the column had become a "cauliflower", and all the spray in the column and its cauliflower was moving down, back into the lagoon. Although cloudlike in shape, the cauliflower was more like the top of a geyser where water stops moving upward and starts to fall. There was no mushroom cloud; nothing rose into the stratosphere.[110]

Meanwhile, lagoon water rushing back into the space vacated by the rising gas bubble started a tsunami which lifted the ships as it passed under them. At 11 seconds after detonation, the first wave was 1,000 feet (300 m) from surface zero and 94 feet (29 m) high.[113] By the time it reached the Bikini Island beach, 3.5 miles (6 km) away, it was a nine-wave set with shore breakers up to 15 feet (5 m) high, which tossed landing craft onto the beach and filled them with sand.[114]

Twelve seconds after detonation, falling water from the column started to create a 900-foot (270 m) tall "base surge" resembling the mist at the bottom of a large waterfall. Unlike the water wave, the base surge rolled over rather than under the ships. Of all the bomb's effects, the base surge had the greatest consequence for most of the target ships, because it painted them with radioactivity that could not be removed.[113] Tactical nuclear warfare advocates described the base surge as generation of very high sea states (GVHSS) disregarding radiation to emphasize the physical damage capable of disabling communication and radar equipment on warship superstructures.[115]

Arkansas

[edit]

Arkansas was the closest ship to the bomb other than the ship from which it was suspended. The underwater shock wave crushed the starboard side of her hull, which faced the bomb, and rolled the battleship over onto her port side. It also ripped off the two starboard propellers and their shafts, along with the rudder and part of the stern, shortening the hull by 25 feet (7.6 m).[116]

She was next seen by Navy divers the same year, lying upside down with her bow on the rim of the underwater bomb crater and stern angled toward the center. There was no sign of the superstructure or the big guns. The first diver to reach Arkansas sank up to his armpits in radioactive mud. When National Park Service divers returned in 1989 and 1990, the bottom was again firm-packed with sand, and the mud was gone. They were able to see the barrels of the forward guns, which had not been visible in 1946.[117]

All battleships are top-heavy and tend to settle upside down when they sink. Arkansas settled upside down, but a 1989 diver's sketch of the wreck shows hardly any of the starboard side of the hull, making it look like the ship is lying on her side. Most of the starboard side is present but severely compacted.[118]

The superstructure has not been found. It either was stripped off and swept away or is lying under the hull, crushed and buried under sand which flowed back into the crater, partially refilling it. The only diver access to the inside is a tight squeeze through the port side casemate, called the "aircastle." The National Park Service divers practiced on the similar casemate of the battleship USS Texas, a museum ship, before entering Arkansas in 1990.[119]

Contrary to popular belief, Arkansas was not lifted vertically by the blast of the weapon test. Forensic examination of the wreck during surveys since the test conclusively show that structural failure of hull plating along the starboard side allowed rapid flooding and capsized the ship.[112]

Aircraft carriers

[edit]

Saratoga, placed close to Baker, sank 7.5 hours after the underwater shock wave opened up leaks in the hull. Immediately after the shock wave passed, the water wave lifted the stern 43 feet (13 m) and the bow 29 feet (8.8 m), rocked the ship side to side, and crashed over her, sweeping all five moored airplanes off the flight deck and knocking the stack over onto the deck. She remained upright and outside the spray column but close enough to be drenched by radioactive water from the collapsing cauliflower head as well as by the base surge.[120] Blandy ordered tugs to tow the carrier to Enyu Island for beaching, but Saratoga and the surrounding water remained too radioactive for close approach until after she sank.[121] She settled upright on the bottom, with the top of her mast 40 feet (12 m) below the surface.[122]

USS Independence survived Able with spectacular damage to the flight deck.[123] She was moored far enough away from Baker to avoid further physical damage but was severely contaminated. She was towed to San Francisco,[124] where four years of decontamination experiments at the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard failed to produce satisfactory results. On January 29, 1951, she was scuttled near the Farallon Islands.[125]

Fission-product radioactivity

[edit]

Baker was the first nuclear explosion close enough to the surface to keep the radioactive fission products in the local environment. It was not "self-cleansing." The result was radioactive contamination of the lagoon and the target ships. While anticipated, it caused far greater problems than were expected.[126]

The Baker explosion produced about 3 pounds (1.4 kg) of fission products.[127][128] These fission products were thoroughly mixed with the two million tons of spray and seabed sand that were lifted into the spray column and its cauliflower head and then dumped back into the lagoon. Most of it stayed in the lagoon and settled to the bottom or was carried out to sea by the lagoon's internal tidal and wind-driven currents.[110]

A small fraction of the contaminated spray was thrown back into the air as the base surge. Unlike the Wilson cloud, a meteorological phenomenon in clean air, the base surge was a heavy fog bank of radioactive mist that rolled across all the target ships, coating their surfaces with fission products.[129] When the mist in the base surge evaporated, the base surge became invisible but continued to move away, contaminating ships several miles from the detonation point.[130]

Unmanned boats were the first vessels to enter the lagoon. Onboard instruments allowed remote-controlled radiation measurements to be made. When support ships entered the lagoon for evaluation, decontamination, and salvage activities, they steered clear of lagoon water hot spots detected by the drone boats. The standard for radiation exposure to personnel was the same as that used by the Manhattan Project: 0.1 roentgens per day.[131] Because of this constraint, only the five most distant target ships could be boarded on the first day.[132] The closer-in ships were hosed down by Navy fireboats using saltwater and flame retardants. The first hosing reduced radioactivity by half, but subsequent hosings were ineffective.[133] For most of the ships, reboarding had to wait until the short-lived radioisotopes decayed; ten days elapsed before the last of the targets could be boarded.[134]

In the first six days after Baker, when radiation levels were highest, 4,900 men boarded target ships.[135] Sailors tried to scrub off the radioactivity with brushes, water, soap, and lye. Nothing worked, short of sandblasting to bare metal.[133]

Test animals

[edit]
Aftermath of animal testing during Operation Crossroads

Only pigs, goats and rats were used in the Baker test. All the pigs and most of the rats died. Several days elapsed before sailors were able to board the target ships where test animals were located; during that time the accumulated doses from the gamma rays produced by fission products became lethal for the animals.[136] Since much of the public interest in Operation Crossroads had focused on the fate of the test animals, in September Blandy asserted that radiation death is not painful: "The animal merely languishes and recovers or dies a painless death. Suffering among the animals as a whole was negligible."[137] This was clearly not true. While the well-documented suffering of Harry Daghlian and Louis Slotin as they died of radiation injury at Los Alamos was still secret, the widely reported radiation deaths at Hiroshima and Nagasaki had not been painless. In 1908, Dr. Charles Allen Porter had stated in an academic paper, "the agony of inflamed X-ray lesions is almost unequalled in any other disease."[98]

Induced radioactivity

[edit]

The Baker explosion ejected into the environment about twice as many free neutrons as there were fission events. A plutonium fission event produces, on average, 2.9 neutrons, most of which are consumed in the production of more fission, until fission falls off and the remaining uncaptured neutrons escape.[138] In an air burst, most of these environmental neutrons are absorbed by superheated air which rises into the stratosphere, along with the fission products and unfissioned plutonium. In the underwater Baker detonation, the neutrons were captured by seawater in the lagoon.[139]

Of the four major elements in seawater – hydrogen, oxygen, sodium, and chlorine – only sodium takes on intense, short-term radioactivity with the addition of a single neutron to its nucleus: common sodium-23 becomes radioactive sodium-24, with a 15-hour half-life. In six days, its intensity drops a thousandfold, but the corollary of short half-life is high initial intensity. Other isotopes were produced from seawater: hydrogen-3 (half-life 12 years) from hydrogen-2, oxygen-17 (stable) from oxygen-16, and chlorine-36 (half-life about 300,000 years) from chlorine-35, and some trace elements, but scarcity or low short-term intensity (long half-life) rendered them insignificant compared with sodium-24.[139]

Less than one pound of radioactive sodium was produced. If all the neutrons released by the fission of 2 pounds (0.91 kg) of plutonium-239 were captured by sodium-23, 0.4 pounds (0.18 kg) of sodium-24 would result, but sodium did not capture all the neutrons. Unlike fission products, which are heavy and eventually sank to the bottom of the lagoon, the sodium stayed in solution. It contaminated the hulls and onboard salt water systems of support ships that entered the lagoon, as well as the water used in decontamination.[139]

Unfissioned plutonium

[edit]

The 10.6 pounds (4.8 kg) of plutonium which did not undergo fission and the 3 pounds (1.4 kg) of fission products were scattered.[140] Plutonium is not a biological hazard unless ingested or inhaled, and its alpha radiation cannot penetrate skin. Once inside the body it is significantly toxic both radiologically and chemically, having a heavy metal toxicity on a par with that of arsenic.[141] Estimates based on the Manhattan Project's "tolerance dose" of one microgram of plutonium per worker put 10.6 pounds at the equivalent of about five billion tolerable doses.[142]

Plutonium alpha rays could not be detected by the film badges and Geiger counters used by people who boarded the target ships because alpha particles have very low penetrating power, insufficient to enter the glass detection tube. It was assumed to be present in the environment wherever fission product radiation was detected. The decontamination plan was to scrub the target ships free of fission products and assume the plutonium would be washed away in the process. To see if this plan was working, samples of paint, rust, and other target ship surface materials were taken back to a laboratory on the support ship Haven and examined for plutonium.[143] The tests showed that the plan was not working. The results of these plutonium detection tests, and of tests performed on fish caught in the lagoon, caused all decontamination work to be abruptly terminated on August 10, effectively shutting down Operation Crossroads for safety reasons.[144] Tests conducted on the support ship USS Rockbridge in November indicated the presence of 2 milligrams (0.031 gr) of plutonium,[145] which represented 2,000 tolerable doses.[146]

Failed Baker cleanup and program termination

[edit]

The program termination on August 10, sixteen days after Baker, was the result of a showdown between Dr. Stafford Warren, the Army colonel in charge of radiation safety for Operation Crossroads, and Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Special Weapons, Vice Admiral William H. P. Blandy. A radiation safety monitor under Warren's command later described him as "the only Army colonel who ever sank a Navy flotilla."[147]

Warren had been chief of the medical section of the Manhattan Project[148] and was in charge of radiation safety at the Trinity test,[149] as well as of the on-ground inspections at Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the bombings.[150] At Operation Crossroads, it was his job to keep the sailors safe during the cleanup.[151]

Radiation monitoring

[edit]
Extensive structural damage and clean-up attempts on ships

A total of 18,875 film badge dosimeters were issued to personnel during the operation. About 6,596 dosimeters were given to personnel who were based on the nearby islands or support ships that had no potential for radiation exposure. The rest were issued to all of the individuals thought to be at the greatest risk for radiological contamination along with a percentage of each group who were working in less contaminated areas. Personnel were removed for one or more days from areas and activities of possible exposure if their badges showed more than 0.1 roentgen (R) per day exposure. Experts believed at the time that this radiation dose could be tolerated by individuals for long periods without any harmful effects. The maximum accumulated dose of 3.72 R was received by a radiation safety monitor.[152]

Cleanup issues

[edit]

The cleanup was hampered by two significant factors: the unexpected base surge and the lack of a viable cleanup plan. It was understood that if the water column fell back into the lagoon, which it did, any ships that were drenched by falling water might be contaminated beyond redemption. Nobody expected that to happen to almost the entire target fleet.[153] No decontamination procedures had been tested to see if they would work and to measure the potential risk to personnel. In the absence of a decontamination protocol, the ships were cleaned using traditional deck-scrubbing methods: hoses, mops, and brushes, with water, soap, and lye.[154] The sailors had no protective clothing.[155]

Secondary contamination

[edit]
Aftermath of Operation Crossroads from the air, with extensive ongoing fires on affected vessels

By August 3, Colonel Warren concluded the entire effort was futile and dangerous.[156] The unprotected sailors were stirring up radioactive material and contaminating their skin, clothing, and, presumably, their lungs. When they returned to their support ship living quarters, they contaminated the shower stalls, laundry facilities, and everything they touched. Warren demanded an immediate halt to the entire cleanup operation. He was especially concerned about plutonium, which was undetectable on site.[157]

Warren also observed that the radiation safety procedures were not being followed correctly.[158] Fire boats got too close to the target ships they were hosing and drenched their crews with radioactive spray. One fire boat had to be taken out of service.[158] Film badges showed 67 overdoses between August 6 and 9.[147] More than half of the 320 Geiger counters available shorted out and became unavailable.[159] The crews of two target ships, USS Wainwright and USS Carteret, moored far from the detonation site, had moved back on board and become overexposed. They were immediately evacuated back to the United States.[160]

Captain L. H. Bibby, commanding officer of the apparently undamaged battleship New York, accused Warren's radsafe monitors of holding their Geiger counters too close to the deck.[147] He wanted to reboard his ship and sail it home. The steadily dropping radiation counts on the target ships gave an illusion that the cleanup was working, but Warren explained that although fission products were losing some of their gamma ray potency through radioactive decay, the ships were still contaminated. The danger of ingesting microscopic particles remained.[156]

Warren persuades Blandy

[edit]
Radioactive parts of a fish show as white against a black background.
A radioactive surgeonfish makes its own x-ray. The bright area is a meal of fresh algae. The rest of the body has absorbed and distributed enough plutonium to make the scales radioactive. The fish was alive and apparently healthy when captured.

Blandy ordered Warren to explain his position to 1,400 skeptical officers and sailors.[147] Some found him persuasive, but it was August 9 before he convinced Blandy. That was the date when Blandy realized, for the first time, that Geiger counters could not detect plutonium.[143] Blandy was aware of the health problems of radium dial painters who ingested microscopic amounts of radium in the 1920s, and the fact that plutonium was assumed to have a similar biological effect. When plutonium was discovered in the captain's quarters of Prinz Eugen, unaccompanied by fission products, Blandy realized that plutonium could be anywhere.[161]

The following day, August 10, Warren showed Blandy an autoradiograph of a fish, an x-ray picture made by radiation coming from the fish. The outline of the fish was made by alpha radiation from the fish scales, evidence that plutonium, mimicking calcium, had been distributed throughout the fish, out to the scales. Blandy announced his decision, "then we call it all to a halt." He ordered that all further decontamination work be discontinued.[144] Warren wrote home, "A self x ray of a fish ... did the trick."[144]

The decontamination failure ended plans to outfit some of the target ships for the 1947 Charlie shot and to sail the rest home in triumph. The immediate public relations problem was to avoid any perception that the entire target fleet had been destroyed. On August 6, in anticipation of this development, Blandy had told his staff that ships sunk or destroyed more than 30 days after the Baker shot "will not be considered as sunk by the bomb."[162] By then, public interest in Operation Crossroads was waning, and the reporters had gone home. The failure of decontamination did not make news until the final reports came out a year later.[163]

Test Charlie

[edit]
A man in naval uniform and a woman wearing a hat cut into a cake labeled Operation Crossroads, and shaped like a mushroom cloud, while another naval officer looks on.
Blandy and his wife slice into an Operation Crossroads cake shaped like Baker's radioactive geyser, while Rear Admiral Frank J. Lowry looks on, November 7, 1946

Testing program staff originally set test Charlie for early 1947. They wanted to explode it deep under the surface in the lee of the atoll to test the effect of nuclear weapons as depth charges on unmoored ships.[41] The unanticipated delays in decontaminating the target ships after test Baker[25] prevented the required technical support personnel from assisting with Charlie and also meant that there were no uncontaminated target ships available for use in Charlie. The naval weapons program staff decided the test was less pressing given that the entire U.S. arsenal had only a handful of nuclear weapons and canceled the test. The official reason given for canceling Charlie was that the program staff felt it was unnecessary because of the success of the Able and Baker tests.[164] The deep ocean effects testing that Charlie was to have performed were fulfilled nine years later with Operation Wigwam.[165]

Aftermath

[edit]

All ships leak and require the regular operation of bilge pumps to stay afloat.[166] If their bilge pumps could not be operated, the target ships would eventually sink. Only one suffered this fate: Prinz Eugen, which sank in the Kwajalein lagoon on December 22. The rest were kept afloat long enough to be deliberately sunk or dismantled. After the August 10 decision to stop decontamination work at Bikini, the surviving target fleet was towed to Kwajalein Atoll where the live ammunition and fuel could be offloaded in uncontaminated water. The move was accomplished during the remainder of August and September.[167]

Eight of the major ships and two submarines were towed back to the United States and Hawaii for radiological inspection. Twelve target ships were so lightly contaminated that they were remanned and sailed back to the United States by their crews. Ultimately, only nine target ships were able to be scrapped rather than scuttled. The remaining target ships were scuttled off Bikini or Kwajalein Atolls, or near the Hawaiian Islands or the California coast during 1946–1948.[168] The remains of Independence were retained at Hunters Point Shipyard until 1951 to test decontamination methods.[169]: 6–24 

The support ships were decontaminated as necessary and received a radiological clearance before they could return to the fleet. This required a great deal of experimentation at Navy shipyards in the United States, primarily in San Francisco at Hunters Point.[169]: 6–15  The destroyer USS Laffey required "sandblasting and painting of all underwater surfaces, and acid washing and partial replacement of salt-water piping and evaporators."[170]

A survey was conducted in mid-1947 to study long-term effects of the Operation Crossroads tests. According to the official report, decontamination efforts "revealed conclusively that removal of radioactive contamination of the type encountered in the target vessels in test Baker cannot be accomplished successfully."[171]

On August 11, 1947, Life summarized the report in a 14-page article with 33 pictures.[172] The article states, "If all the ships at Bikini had been fully manned, the Baker Day bomb would have killed 35,000 crewmen. If such a bomb were dropped below New York's Battery in a stiff south wind, 2 million people would die."[173]

The contamination problem was not widely appreciated by the general public until 1948, when No Place to Hide, a best-selling book by David Bradley, was serialized in the Atlantic Monthly, condensed by the Reader's Digest, and selected by the Book of the Month Club.[174] In his preface, Bradley, a key member of the Radiological Safety Section at Bikini known as the "Geiger men", asserted that "the accounts of the actual explosions, however well intended, were liberally seasoned with fantasy and superstition, and the results of the tests have remained buried in the vaults of military security."[175] His description of the Baker test and its aftermath brought to world attention the problem of radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons.[176]

Personnel exposure

[edit]
Operation Crossroads ID Card

All Operation Crossroads operations were designed to keep personnel from being exposed to more than 0.1 roentgen (R) per day. At the time, this was considered to be an amount of radiation that could be tolerated for long periods without any harmful effects on health. Since there was no special clothing or radiation shielding available, the protection plan relied on managing who went where, when, and for how long.[38]

Radioactively "hot" areas were predicted and then checked with Geiger counters, sometimes by remote control, to see if they were safe. The level of measured gamma radiation determined how long personnel could operate in them without exceeding the allowable daily dose.[38] Instant gamma readings were taken by radiation safety specialists, but film-badge dosimeters, which could be read at the end of the day, were issued to all personnel believed to be at the greatest radiological risk. Anyone whose badge showed more than 0.1 R per day exposure was removed for one or more days from areas and activities of possible exposure. The maximum accumulated exposure recorded was 3.72 R, received by a radiation safety specialist.[38]

A percentage of each group working in less contaminated areas was badged. Eventually, 18,875 film-badge dosimeters were issued to about 15% of the total work force. On the basis of this sampling, a theoretical total exposure was calculated for each person who did not have a personal badge.[38] As expected, exposures for target ship crewmen who boarded their ships after Baker were higher than those for support ship crews. The hulls of support ships that entered the lagoon after Baker became so radioactive that sleeping quarters were moved toward the center of each ship.[177] Of the total mass of radioactive particles scattered by each explosion, 85% was unfissioned plutonium which produces alpha radiation not detected by film badges or Geiger counters. There was no method of detecting plutonium in a timely fashion, and participants were not monitored for ingestion of it.[139]

A summary of film badge readings (in roentgens) for July and August, when the largest number of personnel was involved, is listed below:

Actual film badge readings (+R gamma)
Readings[38] Total 0 0.001–0.1 0.101–1.0 1.001–10.0
July 3,767 (100%) 2,843 (75%) 689 (18%) 232 (6%) 3 (<0.1%)
August 6,664 (100%) 3,947 (59%) 2,139 (32%) 570 (9%) 8 (0.1%)

Service members who participated in the cleanup of contaminated ships were exposed to unknown amounts of radiation. In 1996, a government-sponsored mortality study of Operation Crossroads veterans[178] showed that, by 1992, 46 years after the tests, veterans had experienced a 4.6% higher mortality than a control group of non-veterans. There were 200 more deaths among Operation Crossroads veterans than in the similar control group (12,520 vs. 12,320), implying a life-span reduction of about three months for Operation Crossroads veterans.[179] Veterans who were exposed to radiation formed the non-profit National Association of Atomic Veterans in 1978 to lobby for veterans benefits covering illnesses they believed were caused by their exposure.[178]

Legislation was passed in 1988 that removed the need for veterans to prove a causal link between certain forms of cancer and radiation exposure due to nuclear tests.[180] Incidence of the main expected causes of this increased mortality, leukemia and other cancers, was not significantly higher than normal. Death by those diseases was tabulated on the assumption that if radiation exposure had a life-shortening effect it would likely show up there, but it did not. Not enough data were gathered on other causes of death to determine the reason for this increase in all-cause mortality, and it remains a mystery. The mortality increase was higher, 5.7%, for those who boarded target ships after the tests than for those who did not, whose mortality increase was 4.3%.[178]

Bikini Atoll

[edit]
USS Nevada post-Operation Crossroads with extensive damage

The 167 Bikini residents who were moved to the Rongerik Atoll prior to the Crossroads tests were unable to gather sufficient food or catch enough fish and shellfish to feed themselves in their new environment. The Navy left food and water for a few weeks and then failed to return in a timely manner. By January 1947, visitors to Rongerik reported the islanders were suffering malnutrition, facing potential starvation by July, and were emaciated by January 1948. In March 1948 they were evacuated to Kwajalein, and then settled onto another uninhabited island, Kili, in November. With only one third of a square mile, Kili has one sixth the land area of Bikini and, more importantly, has no lagoon and no protected harbor. Unable to practice their native culture of lagoon fishing, they became dependent on food shipments. Their 4,000 descendants today are living on several islands and in foreign countries.[33]

Their desire to return to Bikini was thwarted indefinitely by the U.S. decision to resume nuclear testing at Bikini in 1954. During 1954, 1956, and 1958, 21 more nuclear bombs were detonated at Bikini, yielding a total of 75 megatons of TNT (310 PJ), equivalent to more than 3,000 Baker bombs. Only one was an air burst, the 3.8 megaton Redwing Cherokee test. Air bursts distribute fallout in a large area, but surface bursts produce intense local fallout.[181] The first after Crossroads was the dirtiest: the 15 megaton Bravo shot of Operation Castle on March 1, 1954, which was the largest-ever U.S. test. Fallout from Bravo caused radiation injury to Bikini islanders who were living on Rongelap Atoll.[182]

The brief attempt to resettle Bikini from 1972 until 1978 was aborted when health problems from radioactivity in the food supply caused the atoll to be evacuated again. Sport divers who visit Bikini to dive on the shipwrecks must eat imported food. The local government elected to close the fly-in fly-out sports diving operation in Bikini lagoon in 2008,[183] and the 2009 diving season was canceled due to fuel costs, unreliable airline service to the island, and a decline in the Bikini Islanders' trust fund which subsidized the operation.[33] After a successful trial in October 2010, the local government licensed a sole provider of dive expeditions on the nuclear ghost fleet at Bikini Atoll starting in 2011. The aircraft carrier Saratoga is the primary attraction of a struggling, high-end sport diving industry.[34]

Legacy

[edit]

Following test Baker decontamination problems, the United States Navy equipped newly constructed ships with a Countermeasure Wash Down System of piping and nozzles to cover exterior surfaces of the ship with a spray of salt water from the firefighting system when nuclear attack appeared imminent. The film of flowing water would theoretically prevent contaminants from settling into cracks and crevices.[184]

[edit]

The juxtaposition of half-naked islanders with nuclear weapons that had the power to reduce everyone to a primitive state provided some with an inspirational motif. During Operation Crossroads, Paris swimwear designer Louis Réard adopted the name Bikini for his minimalist swimsuit design which, revolutionary for the time, exposed the wearer's navel. He explained that "like the bomb, the bikini is small and devastating".[185] Fashion writer Diana Vreeland described the bikini as the "atom bomb of fashion".[185] While two-piece swimsuits have been used since antiquity, it was Réard's name of the Bikini that stuck for all of its modern incarnations.[186]

Artist Bruce Conner made Crossroads, a 1976 video assembled from the official films, with an audio collage fashioned by Patrick Gleeson on a Moog synthesizer and a drone composition performed on an electric organ by Terry Riley. A commentator at The New York Review of Books called the experience of watching the video the "nuclear sublime."[187]

Films and TV shows have used archive footage of the test Baker explosion in a fictitious capacity. In the animated comedy series SpongeBob SquarePants, the footage is used three times; in the season 2 episode "Dying for Pie", in the season 5 episode "The Krusty Plate", and in the season 8 episode "Frozen Face-Off". One film example, TriStar Pictures' Godzilla from 1998, uses the Baker test footage in the film's opening to depict the atomic bomb responsible for the creation of the titular monster. In Godzilla Minus One, Operation Crossroads was the cause of Godzilla's mutation in the first place, with the film's novelisation elaborating that Baker was the specific detonation responsible. The test Baker explosion archival footage is also used in the Stanley Kubrick film Dr. Strangelove.[188] The footage plays during the ending montage of the movie accompanied by Vera Lynn singing "We'll Meet Again".[189]

See also

[edit]
  • Wōdejebato – a nearby seamount explored and mapped during these tests.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Operation Crossroads was a pair of nuclear weapon tests conducted by the at in the during July 1946 to investigate the destructive effects of atomic bombs on warships, , , and equipment.
The operation, directed by Joint Task Force One under William Blandy, involved assembling a target fleet of 95 obsolete and captured vessels—including battleships, carriers, and the Japanese cruiser Nagato—positioned in the atoll's lagoon, while 167 native inhabitants were relocated to to facilitate the tests. The two detonations employed plutonium implosion devices yielding 23 kilotons each: Test Able, an airburst at 158 meters altitude on July 1 that detonated off-target and sank only five ships with moderate damage to others, and Test Baker, an underwater explosion at 27 meters depth on July 25 that sank eight vessels immediately, capsized others, and rendered many survivors highly radioactive due to persistent contamination from lagoon water.
These results empirically demonstrated the obsolescence of traditional naval formations against s, particularly underwater bursts that generated shockwaves, fireballs, and fallout far exceeding blast effects alone, prompting doctrinal shifts toward dispersed operations and carrier-centric strategies while exposing long-term radiological hazards that prevented full decontamination of affected ships and contributed to 's prolonged uninhabitability.

Historical Context and Objectives

Post-World War II Geopolitical Pressures

Following the Allied victory in on September 2, 1945, the confronted the as its principal geopolitical adversary, with the maintaining a formidable conventional force structure amid rapid U.S. . While the U.S. reduced its military personnel from approximately 12 million in August 1945 to under 2 million by mid-1947, Soviet forces, though demobilizing from wartime peaks of over 11 million, retained significant strength, including projections of mobilizing up to 84 divisions in within days of conflict onset as assessed in contemporaneous U.S. Army studies. This disparity underscored the empirical necessity of leveraging America's atomic monopoly—exclusive until the Soviet test in 1949—to deter potential aggression, particularly as Stalin's consolidation of and refusal to withdraw from in heightened tensions over continental security. The atomic bombings of on August 6, 1945, and on August 9, 1945, had demonstrated devastating effects against land targets but left unexamined the impacts on naval assets, raising critical questions about fleet survivability in a hypothetical conflict with a naval-oriented power like the , which was expanding its Black Sea and Baltic fleets. U.S. military planners recognized that without empirical data on atomic weapons' effects at sea—such as blast radius, shock waves, and fire propagation on ships—the risked obsolescence in , especially given inter-service debates over air power's dominance in the nuclear era. On October 16, 1945, Admiral formally recommended to the that atomic tests target naval vessels to evaluate and refine ship designs, tactics, and dispositions for atomic defense, emphasizing the need to affirm sea power's viability amid emerging global threats. In response to this joint military advocacy, President approved Operation Crossroads on , , allocating resources to conduct the tests and inform defense budgeting and doctrine during postwar fiscal constraints and . The initiative reflected a pragmatic of atomic deterrence over diplomatic restraint, as James Byrnes' concerns about international backlash were overruled in favor of securing naval appropriations and validating strategies to counter Soviet conventional superiority through demonstrated nuclear efficacy. Soviet observers' presence at the tests further highlighted the operation's role in signaling U.S. resolve, though underlying motivations centered on causal assessments of weapon effects rather than mere posturing.

Military and Scientific Goals

The primary military objectives of Operation Crossroads centered on determining the effects of atomic detonations on naval vessels and equipment to inform vulnerability assessments and tactical doctrines. Specifically, the tests sought to quantify structural damage, fires, and operational impairments from blast overpressure, thermal radiation, and shockwaves in both airburst and underwater configurations, using a target fleet of over 90 warships positioned at varying distances from ground zero. This included evaluating ship survivability under simulated fleet concentrations, training personnel in atomic delivery techniques, and assessing damage to ancillary military hardware such as and . Scientific aims focused on empirical of nuclear phenomena to advance understanding of effects and strategies. Key priorities involved analyzing the initial gamma radiation and alongside residual contamination from fission products, including their dispersion via water spray and base surge in bursts. Researchers aimed to develop methods—such as washing, chemical agents, and mechanical abrasion—for ships, personnel, and waters, while studying biological responses in test animals (e.g., , rats, and ) to establish dose-response thresholds for and long-term genetic impacts. Environmental monitoring encompassed pressure waves, crater formation, and wave propagation to model hydrodynamic effects. The operation also incorporated international observation to demonstrate U.S. nuclear proficiency amid postwar rivalries, with invitations extended to representatives from the , , , and the via the Atomic Energy Commission. Around 21 UN AEC delegates, including Soviet personnel, and 9 British scientists attended, providing opportunities to observe effects firsthand from safe distances aboard support vessels while enabling the U.S. to assess foreign technical evaluations and strategic inferences.

Selection of Bikini Atoll and Native Relocation

was selected as the site for Operation Crossroads on January 24, 1946, by the after evaluating Pacific locations under U.S. control that met stringent criteria: a protected anchorage at least six nautical miles wide for target vessels, near-total uninhabitability, at least 300 statute miles from any city to limit fallout risks to non-test populations, absence of severe storms or extreme cold, and reliable wind and current patterns for predictable blast propagation. The atoll's remote position in the northern ' chain, surrounded by open ocean to the north and with few nearby inhabited islands, ensured isolation that prioritized test efficacy by reducing external interference and containing potential radiological drift away from continental areas. The site's central , spanning roughly 25 miles in length and 15 miles in width with depths up to 200 feet, offered a natural harbor for extensive ship arrays required for evaluating nuclear effects on naval assets, while its enclosed facilitated controlled underwater detonations without excessive dispersal. Pre-selection surveys by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service addressed commercial fishing concerns by confirming minimal impact on tuna or whale populations, and Navy expeditions aboard vessels including the and USS Bowditch from January to April 1946 assessed oceanographic conditions, currents, and baseline biology to validate the atoll's logistical fit. To prepare the site, on February 10, 1946, Commodore Ben H. Wyatt met with Bikini Atoll's 167 residents and secured their consent for temporary relocation, framing it as a patriotic and short-term measure akin to biblical exile, with assurances of post-test return. The islanders were evacuated on March 7, 1946, via the USS LST-1108, arriving at —about 125 miles eastward—the next day after a voyage that included transporting personal effects like for thatching. In advance, a battalion had erected 26 frame houses and water cisterns on Rongerik to sustain the group, reflecting logistical planning to maintain habitability during the anticipated brief absence. U.S. military representatives emphasized the relocation's reversibility, providing the impression it would not disrupt long-term residency.

Planning and Preparation

Assembly of Target Fleet

The target fleet for Operation Crossroads comprised 95 vessels assembled in Bikini Atoll's lagoon to replicate a concentrated naval task force vulnerable to nuclear attack. This array included obsolete U.S. Navy ships such as the battleships USS Nevada, USS Arkansas, USS New York, and USS Pennsylvania, the aircraft carriers USS Saratoga and USS Independence, two cruisers, 13 destroyers, eight submarines, numerous landing ships and craft, and miscellaneous support vessels. Captured Axis warships, including the Japanese battleship Nagato and cruiser Sakawa, supplemented the U.S. contingent, providing a mix of designs for comparative vulnerability assessment. Many vessels were surplus from World War II, either decommissioned or previously damaged and repaired minimally for the tests, reflecting post-war fiscal constraints and the Navy's emphasis on utilizing existing assets rather than procuring new ones. Positioning of the fleet began in May 1946, with ships anchored at distances from ground zero ranging from 290 to 17,000 yards to evaluate blast effects across a spectrum of proximities and formation densities. The arrangement featured high concentration near the center—approximating 20 ships per —to simulate wartime fleet clustering, while outer ships tested dispersion tactics. Submarines were moored at varied depths and angles, some surfaced and others submerged, to probe underwater hull integrity and operational recovery. Select vessels were outfitted as instrumented platforms with cameras, pressure gauges, and radiation detectors to capture data on structural and systemic responses. Biological test subjects, including goats, pigs, rats, and mice, were distributed across decks to gauge physiological impacts on crews in simulated combat conditions. This engineering effort transformed Bikini Lagoon into a controlled analog of a modern battle fleet, enabling empirical analysis of atomic weaponry against diverse naval architectures without expending active-duty resources.

Instrumentation and Observation Systems

Over 10,000 scientific instruments were deployed across target ships, shore stations, and during Operation Crossroads to record blast dynamics, structural responses, and radiological effects. These encompassed pressure gauges for capturing shockwave pressures and velocities, blast pins and strain gauges on hulls to quantify structural deformations, and specialized wave motion sensors including supersonic sounders for underwater studies. Visual and systems featured 750 cameras positioned at varying distances, including high-speed models to document fireball expansion and initial sequences, supplemented by four transmitters for relayed imagery from island towers. measurement relied on 25,000 detectors and recorders distributed on vessels and aerial platforms to track gamma and fluxes, enabling post-detonation mapping of contamination gradients. Unmanned platforms advanced close-range , with radio-controlled B-17 aircraft fitted with onboard cameras, radiation samplers, and systems to traverse the and collect airborne particulate data. These innovations, supported by 156 aircraft and steel-shielded shore installations, prioritized empirical capture of causal sequences such as pressure differentials driving hull failures and inducing ignitions, informing models of nuclear effects on fleet configurations.

Personnel Mobilization and Safety Protocols

Joint Task Force One (JTF-1), commanded by and comprising primarily U.S. personnel alongside , , and civilian scientists, mobilized approximately 42,000 individuals for Operation Crossroads, marking it as the largest U.S. peacetime military operation to date. This force assembled ships, , and support infrastructure at before transiting to , with personnel assignments prioritizing operational roles in observation, instrumentation, and vessel management over comprehensive risk mitigation reflective of later standards. Training regimens focused on maintaining prescribed distances from the blast radius—typically 10 to 20 miles for surface ships and —and employing for sensitive equipment and personnel in high-risk observation positions, drawing initial lessons from the 1945 test's observed blast and thermal effects. Safety protocols emphasized practical precautions aligned with 1946 understandings of atomic weaponry, including the distribution of film-badge dosimeters to track cumulative gamma among participants, though real-time monitoring relied on specialist surveys rather than individual alerts. Evacuation drills were conducted for crews on target vessels, ensuring all non-essential personnel were removed via attack transports to safe standoff positions prior to detonations, with reboarding delayed pending radiological surveys. These measures prioritized test execution and , accepting calculated risks to advance naval vulnerability assessments amid postwar strategic imperatives, without the benefit of subsequent decades' fallout modeling. To underscore the tests' deterrent implications for global audiences, JTF-1 accommodated over 160 international journalists and media representatives, providing dedicated observation vessels and briefings while enforcing the same distance and shielding protocols applied to military personnel. This inclusion facilitated widespread coverage of the Able detonation on July 1, 1946, aiming to demonstrate atomic weapons' transformative impact on seapower without compromising operational security.

Execution of Test Able

Detonation Parameters and Sequence

Test Able involved the airburst detonation of a Mark III Fat Man-type plutonium implosion bomb, code-named "Gilda," with an estimated yield of 23 kilotons of TNT equivalent, on July 1, 1946, at 09:00:34 local time (22:00:34 GMT). The device was dropped from a B-29 Superfortress bomber flying at approximately 30,500 feet over Bikini Atoll's lagoon, where the target fleet was arrayed. The bomb detonated at a height of 520 feet (158 meters) above the water surface, intended as an airburst to maximize blast effects across the surface vessels, but it missed the designated ground zero by 2,130 feet (650 meters) northwest due to inaccuracies in the bombing run, possibly influenced by suboptimal visibility conditions. This deviation from the aim point, occurring after a free-fall duration of approximately 158 seconds, compromised the test's ability to assess symmetrical blast propagation and reduced the yield of comparative data on fleet vulnerability. At the moment of detonation, the nuclear reaction initiated a prompt release of thermal radiation and x-rays, followed by the rapid expansion of a luminous fireball that grew to roughly 1,200 feet in diameter within the first 0.1 seconds. The subsequent hydrodynamic phase transitioned into the formation of a shock wave, which propagated outward supersonically across the lagoon, compressing air and generating overpressures documented by pressure gauges on instrumented ships and buoys. High-speed cameras and radiometers captured the shock front's advance, recording its interaction with the water surface and initial atmospheric disturbances, though the offset ground zero led to asymmetric wave patterns. The test resulted in the sinking of five target vessels from primary blast effects, marking a partial success in demonstrating nuclear weapon impacts but highlighting limitations in delivery precision for optimal empirical outcomes.

Damage to Target Vessels

![View of the target fleet after Crossroads test Able on 1 July 1946.jpg][center] The Able detonation on , , occurred as an airburst at approximately 520 feet (158 meters) altitude with a yield of 23 kilotons, but deviated from the intended aim point over the USS Nevada by about 2,130 feet (650 meters) southeast, reducing overall blast effects on the primary targets. This misalignment limited structural failures primarily to vessels nearest the actual ground zero, demonstrating that blast diminished rapidly beyond 1,000 yards, with ship type and orientation influencing vulnerability to shock waves and effects. The attack transport USS Gilliam (APA-57), positioned roughly 950 yards (870 meters) from ground zero, suffered catastrophic hull rupture from the blast wave, capsizing bow-first at a 70-degree angle and sinking in 79 seconds; post-blast surveys confirmed extensive buckling of bulkheads and deck plating as the primary causal mechanism. No other vessels sank directly from the initial shock wave, though secondary fires contributed to further degradation on some. The aircraft carrier USS Saratoga (CV-3), at about 1,500 yards, experienced temporary heeling of up to 10 degrees from asymmetric blast loading but stabilized without hull breach, indicating resilience of larger, armored hulls to indirect overpressure. The battleship USS Nevada (BB-36), the designated aim point at 710 yards northwest of actual ground zero, endured severe topside scorching from the thermal pulse, igniting paint and wooden fittings across the deck and superstructures, alongside minor buckling of unarmored sections; however, its armored citadel remained intact, validating models of blast radius attenuation against heavily protected capital ships. Destroyers such as USS Lamson (DD-367) and USS Anderson (DD-411), farther out at over 2,000 yards, reported only superficial blast damage like shattered glass and displaced equipment, with no structural compromise.
ShipTypeApproximate Distance from Ground ZeroPrimary Blast Damage
USS Gilliam (APA-57)Attack Transport950 yardsHull rupture, capsized and sunk in 79 seconds
USS Saratoga (CV-3)Aircraft Carrier1,500 yardsTemporary heeling, minor deck distortion
USS Nevada (BB-36)Battleship710 yardsTopside thermal scorching, fires, minor buckling
USS Lamson (DD-367)Destroyer>2,000 yardsSuperficial impacts, no hull failure
Vessels beyond 3,000 yards exhibited negligible mechanical harm, underscoring the airburst's confinement of peak overpressures to proximal zones and affirming pre-test hydrodynamic calculations that lighter, topside-heavy ships were most susceptible to capsize or fragmentation. This empirical distribution corroborated causal models prioritizing and vessel distribution over uniform fleet-wide vulnerability.

Initial Radiation Measurements and Biological Tests

The Able detonation on July 1, 1946, produced prompt gamma and that posed hazards primarily within 4,000 yards of ground zero, with intensities decaying rapidly in inverse proportion to time after the initial hour (e.g., halving from 15 roentgens per hour at one hour post-detonation to 7.5 roentgens per hour at two hours). Fission product followed a pattern of reducing by a factor of ten for every sevenfold increase in elapsed time, remaining valid for approximately six months before accelerating. The airburst at 520 feet altitude limited and subsequent in ship structures and materials, resulting in negligible residual levels beyond 750 yards within days, allowing reboarding of most vessels by July 1–3. Biological tests involved animals positioned on target ships to assess acute effects, with mortality exceeding 50% within 1,000 yards, 15–30% between 1,000 and 2,000 yards, and 5–15% beyond 2,000 yards, primarily attributable to prompt rather than blast or injury. Most surviving animals exhibited low acute symptoms immediately post-detonation, though delayed fatalities emerged over subsequent weeks, with early observations noting minor transient physiological disturbances but no immediate widespread beta burns from residual fallout, which was minimal due to the airburst configuration. Human observers and support personnel experienced gamma exposures generally below 0.1 roentgen per day, aligning with pre-test safety protocols that set this as the maximum allowable limit, with film badge data showing 75.5% of monitored individuals receiving 0–0.1 rem in July 1946 and the highest single reading at 3.72 rem for a radiological safety monitor. Drone control pilots averaged 0.02 roentgen, with a maximum of 0.03 roentgen, confirming predictions of low prompt radiation risk at observation distances.

Execution of Test Baker

Detonation Parameters and Underwater Effects

Test Baker involved the detonation of a 23-kiloton implosion-type nuclear device, identical in design to the bomb used at , suspended 90 feet (27 meters) underwater from the in Bikini Lagoon. The explosion occurred at 08:35 local time on July 25, 1946, following a precise initiated from the command ship . The initial fireball formed a rapidly expanding luminous sphere of hot gases and vaporized , confined by the surrounding medium and absorbing x-rays while cooling more rapidly than in air. This generated a primary shockwave that propagated through at higher speeds and pressures compared to atmospheric transmission, with water's incompressibility enabling sustained transfer over distances. A gas bubble emerged from the fireball's expansion, creating a cavity that oscillated and collapsed, producing secondary shockwaves that amplified structural stresses through repeated impulses. The bubble's pulsation drove water displacement, forming a mound or dome on the surface estimated at several thousand feet high. The collapsing bubble ejected a spray plume of contaminated water and steam, rising as a column up to 6,000 feet (1,800 meters) tall and 2,000 feet (600 meters) in diameter within seconds, entraining fission products into a visible boiling cloud that extended outward. This plume's upward thrust and subsequent fallout differed from airburst dispersal by localizing radioactive material in a denser waterborne pool, enhancing persistence in the aquatic environment.

Sequence of Blast Events and Ship Damage

The underwater detonation of Test Baker on July 25, 1946, at 08:35 local time involved a 23-kiloton device suspended 90 feet beneath the LSM-60 at lagoon. Within the initial 0-10 seconds, the shockwave radiated outward through the denser medium of water, generating a massive bubble that collapsed and propelled a plume jet upward, forming a reaching 5,000-8,000 feet high and 2,500 feet in diameter. This hydrodynamic pressure pulse immediately disrupted vessel stability and hull integrity for ships in close proximity; the USS Arkansas, moored 620 yards north of surface zero, experienced an upward surge of blast water from below and to starboard at approximately one-third of its length, causing it to capsize and sink within minutes. Similarly, the USS Saratoga, farther out, suffered multiple torpedo-like holings from directed bubble jet effects, with its stern lifting 43 feet amid initial listing to starboard. From 20 to 60 seconds post-detonation, the collapsing water column dispersed into concentric waves 50-75 feet high within a 4,000-foot radius, accompanied by a base surge of spray and debris that inundated the target array and accelerated flooding through breaches and open fittings. This phase saw eight ships sink immediately or within hours due to uncontrollable flooding, including the destroyers USS Anderson (DD-411) and USS Lamson (DD-367), submarines USS Apogon (SS-308) and USS Pilotfish (SS-386), attack transport USS Gilliam (APA-57), and landing ship medium LSM-60 at ground zero, along with associated landing craft. The heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen incurred hull breaches from the shockwave but remained afloat initially, though progressive flooding contributed to its later capsizing in December 1946 after towing to Kwajalein Atoll. USS Saratoga's damage worsened progressively, with its stack collapsing and stern submerging, leading to full sinking by approximately 16:08 that day. The underwater burst's efficacy in inflicting damage stemmed from the shockwave's transmission through , which amplified on hulls and enabled rapid internal flooding via penetrated compartments, contrasting sharply with Test Able's airburst that emphasized above-water blast and thermal effects with fewer sinkings. Baker thus inflicted structural damage on a greater proportion of the approximately 95-vessel target fleet—estimated at around 50 percent immobilized or severely compromised—primarily through hydrodynamic forces rather than surface disruption alone.

Contamination Dynamics and Monitoring

The underwater detonation of Test Baker on July 25, 1946, at a depth of 90 feet generated a base surge—a rapidly expanding cloud of vaporized water, steam, and entrained fission products—that propagated across the lagoon at initial speeds exceeding 60 miles per hour, extending 2,000 yards upwind, 3,000 yards crosswind, and over 4,000 yards downwind. This surge deposited a film of contaminated water exceeding 1 inch thick on target vessels, embedding plutonium and fission debris into porous surfaces such as paint, rust, and organic growths, which resisted removal due to the adhesive nature of the hydrated residues. Unlike the atmospheric dispersion of fallout in the airburst Test Able, the water-mediated transport in Baker suspended approximately 2-20% of the roughly 1.4 kilograms of fission products within the surge's aerosol droplets, promoting localized deposition and reduced initial dilution by wind, thereby enhancing short-term surface persistence through evaporation and sedimentation. Radiological monitoring employed Geiger-Müller counters, ionization chambers, and film badges to quantify gamma and beta emissions on ship decks, revealing extreme initial hotspots; for instance, the USS Pensacola at 500 yards recorded 5,600 roentgens in the first hour post-detonation, while the USS Gacondur at 750 yards logged 36,300 roentgens over the same interval. By Baker Day +3, residual levels on the Pensacola's southwest deck had decayed to 3,350 roentgens cumulatively, with topside readings on ships like the USS Gasconade reaching 20 roentgens per 24 hours on August 7. Decay followed an approximate t^{-1.2} to t^{-1.3} curve, slower in localized hotspots than anticipated for pure atmospheric fallout due to the surge's encapsulation of products in water, which delayed diffusion; by Baker Day +10, over 35 ships retained measurable topside contamination exceeding 1 roentgen per 24 hours.
ShipDistance (yards)Initial Radiation (roentgens, first hour)Later Reading (roentgens/24 hr)Time Post-Baker
USS Pensacola5005,60022 (Day +5); 14 (Day +8)N/A
USS Gacondur75036,300N/AN/A
USS GasconadeN/AN/A20 (main deck)Day +13 (Aug 7)
This monitoring underscored the base surge's role in concentrating fission products—equivalent to thousands of tons of at +1 hour—primarily within the lagoon's sediments (40-60 microcuries per gram at 0.25-0.5 miles southwest by Day +6), with 10-50% retention in surface waters amplifying persistence relative to dispersive airburst mechanisms.

Post-Test Operations and Cancellation of Test Charlie

Cleanup Efforts and Challenges

Decontamination operations following the test on July 25, 1946, initiated around August 1 with work crews using high-pressure saltwater hoses to wash ship exteriors, supplemented by manual scrubbing with detergents like , , and boiler compounds. These efforts, conducted under radiological supervision by monitors, yielded partial successes, such as a 66% reduction on USS Tuna via application and 50% on USS Hughes through saltwater washdown, but contaminated runoff frequently reintroduced radioactivity, causing secondary spread across decks and into the lagoon. Divers equipped with dosimeters performed underwater hull inspections and scraping to remove adhered marine growth and scale harboring radioactive particles, supported by barges like LCTs for access and transport of debris. Persistent plutonium residues and chemically bonded contaminants, manifesting as tenacious "black paint"-like layers on surfaces such as USS New York's lookout platform and USS Mugford's superstructure, defied removal, as particles embedded deeply into paint, rust, and metal substrates. More than 225 radiological safety monitors oversaw teams exceeding 300 personnel drawn from target ship companies and construction battalions, operating in shifts amid strains from scarce freshwater, inadequate boat resources, and weather delays. Exponential contamination growth, driven by re-exposure to radioactive lagoon water and alpha-emitting particles in flooded compartments, ultimately rendered progress unsustainable, with efforts halting at Bikini by August 10 due to unrelieved high radiation levels on most vessels.

Radiation Assessment and Decision Factors

Post-Baker radiation surveys conducted by radiological safety teams under Dr. revealed persistent and uneven contamination across the target fleet, with gamma radiation levels on many vessels exceeding safe operational thresholds of 0.1 roentgens per 24 hours (R/24h). Hotspots were identified on decks and compartments, such as 60 R/24h near vent frames on USS Salt Lake City and up to 100 R/24h on USS Trippe, rendering prolonged manned access hazardous and limiting initial boarding times to minutes. These measurements, taken via Geiger counters and film badges from late July through August 1946, demonstrated that decontamination efforts using high-pressure saltwater washes and chemical agents reduced but did not eliminate , with over 90% of the 78 target ships remaining above 1 R/24h in key areas even after weeks of scrubbing at and later Kwajalein. Biological experiments corroborated the dosimetry findings, as animals exposed via immersion in contaminated lagoon water or direct shipboard placement exhibited and high mortality rates indicative of lethal doses. On vessels like those carrying 20 pigs, 176 rats, and other subjects, all pigs succumbed post-Baker due to combined blast, thermal, and beta-gamma exposure from sprayed radioactive mist, while most rats died within days from similar immersion effects. Warren's assessments equated the lagoon's radioactive —equivalent to hundreds of tons of —to levels causing incapacitation in minutes and fatalities in days or weeks for unprotected personnel. Wind-drifted fallout posed risks to the support fleet, contaminating evaporators and salt-water lines on ships beyond the target array, with some recording 0.5–0.75 during initial surveys and necessitating shutdowns to prevent internal dosing. inefficiencies stemmed from untested variables in burst dynamics, including the formation of a persistent base surge that embedded fission products in ship superstructures and biofilms, defying expectations of rapid decay observed in air bursts like Able. By mid-August 1946, Warren recommended against proceeding with Charlie, citing empirical data showing ships would require months rather than weeks to reach re-embarkation standards, prompting Joint Chiefs approval for cancellation on August 14.

Program Termination Rationale

Vice Admiral Blandy, director of Joint Task Force 1, and Stafford Warren, chief of the medical section, assessed the outcomes of Tests Able and Baker in early August 1946, concluding that a third test, Charlie, was unwarranted due to the extensive data already obtained on nuclear effects against naval targets. The Baker test's underwater detonation on July 25, 1946, generated severe across the target fleet and lagoon, rendering efforts futile despite prolonged attempts with high-pressure hoses, detergents, and scrubbing; ships like retained surface levels exceeding 100 roentgens per hour, far above safe thresholds for personnel reboarding. This assessment prioritized operational safety, as further exposure risked acute sickness among the 42,000 members, outweighing the incremental insights a redundant underwater blast would yield. On August 10, 1946, Blandy formally recommended cancellation to Washington, citing the marginal scientific value of Charlie against escalating hazards and logistical strains at . President approved the termination, reflecting a pragmatic calculus that the program's core objectives—evaluating blast damage, propagation, and initial radiological impacts—had been sufficiently addressed through the two conducted detonations, which involved 96 vessels and yielded comprehensive empirical data on vulnerability patterns. This decision averted unnecessary escalation in costs, estimated at additional millions for atoll-based operations, and personnel dosimetry burdens, informing subsequent protocols that favored controlled continental testing sites like those used in in 1948 for enhanced efficiency and reduced environmental variables.

Scientific and Technical Findings

Blast and Structural Damage Analysis

The Able test airburst on July 1, 1946, at 520 feet altitude yielded primarily topside damage from blast concussion and thermal ignition, sinking five of the 95 target ships, including the attack transports and USS Carlisle, due to structural collapse and fires. Approximately 20% of the fleet sustained notable mechanical effects, concentrated within a 0.5-mile radius where peak overpressures exceeded thresholds for deformation. Damage patterns followed predicted scaling, with resilient hull armor mitigating direct wave impacts but failing to prevent propagation in wooden and fuel-laden areas. In contrast, the underwater detonation on July 25, 1946, at 90 feet depth generated hydrodynamic shock waves that caused hull breaches and rapid flooding, sinking eight vessels such as the battleship USS Arkansas at 620 yards and the carrier USS Saratoga at 350 yards, demonstrating superior destructive efficacy against armored heavy units compared to airburst. Shock-induced vulnerabilities manifested as bottom-up failures, with ships like USS Apogon succumbing at 850 yards from fatal compartmental flooding beyond 1,000 yards proving survivable for intact hulls. This configuration highlighted underwater bursts' capacity to bypass topside protections, affecting a comparable under 0.5 miles but with deeper penetration. Synthesizing data across tests established empirical vulnerability metrics for 20-23 kiloton yields, validating Penney's blast scaling where overpressures of several psi sufficed for ignition and minor breaches, escalating to catastrophic structural within 1,000 yards via compounded shock and wave effects. Material analyses revealed armor's adequacy against transient blasts but inadequacy against sustained incendiary , prompting advancements in watertight and automated systems for future designs. These findings underscored localized radii—far smaller than overland effects—affirming ships' relative robustness while quantifying thresholds for operational incapacitation.

Radiation Propagation and Induced Effects

In the Able airburst detonation on July 1, 1946, at an altitude of 158 meters, penetrated ship structures, inducing short-lived primarily through capture reactions in materials such as and . Induced isotopes, including manganese-56 with a 2.58-hour , contributed to initial gamma emissions decaying rapidly within hours to days, with residual levels on target ships dropping below 0.1 roentgens per 24 hours (R/24h) shortly after the blast. Neutron fluences were sufficient to activate elements like sodium in exposed components, but overall induced activity remained minor beyond 750 yards from ground zero, limited by the inverse-square propagation of s through air and ship hulls. The Baker underwater detonation on July 25, 1946, at a depth of 27 meters, contrasted sharply, as neutrons were largely absorbed by surrounding seawater, producing sodium-24 (half-life 15 hours) via the reaction ^{23}Na(n,γ)^{24}Na, with activity peaking transiently before decaying. Fission products, including volatile species like iodine-131 (8-day half-life) and longer-lived strontium-90 (28.8-year half-life), were incorporated into the vaporized water column exceeding 1,800 meters in height, forming a base surge that propagated radioactive aerosols and droplets radially at initial speeds over 50 mph. This mechanism deposited surface contamination equivalent to hundreds of tons of radium across target vessels, with measurements reaching 60 R/24h on decks of ships like USS Salt Lake City, persisting due to adsorption of insoluble particulates and hydrosols onto wet steel surfaces rather than rapid dilution by wind. Physics-based analysis reveals that fission product persistence in Baker arose from their partial solubility and colloidal suspension in seawater, preventing immediate evaporation or dispersion; soluble fractions (e.g., cesium isotopes) leached into lagoon sediments at levels up to 0.292 microcuries per gram in mud cores, while particulates adhered tenaciously, requiring mechanical decontamination to reduce activity. In steel hulls and concrete fittings, induced activity from Baker was secondary to fallout deposition, with total fission product inventories on ships like USS Rockbridge measured at 376 millicuries, dictating decay timelines dominated by medium-half-life emitters (days to weeks) before safer access below 0.1 R/24h. This localized propagation via hydrodynamic surge, rather than atmospheric entrainment, underscored the causal role of burst geometry in contamination dynamics.

Biological and Material Testing Results

Biological testing during Operation Crossroads utilized various animals placed on target vessels to assess effects. In the Able test, an airburst detonation on July 1, 1946, exposed approximately 3,500 —including 176 , 146 pigs, 3,030 rats, 57 guinea pigs, and 109 mice—primarily to prompt gamma , , blast, and thermal effects. Approximately 10% of these animals succumbed to blast injuries, while an additional 15% died from within days, with survivability higher for those positioned farther from ground zero due to attenuation of initial . The Baker test on July 25, 1946, an underwater detonation, shifted exposure mechanisms toward prolonged beta and gamma irradiation from fission products suspended in lagoon water, which contaminated ship surfaces and animals via direct immersion and spray. Only pigs, goats, and rats were deployed, totaling several hundred; all pigs perished from blast or rapid onset of radiation sickness, and most rats followed suit within hours to days, exhibiting symptoms like vomiting, diarrhea, and hematopoietic failure consistent with doses exceeding lethal thresholds for mammals. Goats showed variable outcomes, with some surviving initial exposure but succumbing to secondary infections from compromised immunity, highlighting the caustic role of wet fallout in amplifying bioaccumulation compared to dry airburst conditions. Material testing evaluated nuclear impacts on naval equipment, including instrumentation and structural components. Prompt effects in Able disrupted electronics through overpressure and thermal stress, rendering many gauges and radios inoperable on closer vessels, though shielding mitigated some neutron-induced failures in semiconductors absent in 1946-era vacuum tubes. Baker's subsurface burst induced persistent surface contamination on metals and organics, with fission debris adhering via chemical bonding and precipitation, defying linear removal models. Decontamination trials post-Baker revealed non-linear residue persistence; high-pressure hosing reduced gamma counts by only 10-20% on painted , as isotopes like cesium-137 embedded in porous coatings and biofilms, complicating assumptions and necessitating prolonged isolation. Organic s, such as ropes and fabrics, absorbed radionuclides irreversibly, amplifying dose rates through bio-like uptake mechanisms analogous to animal tissues. These findings underscored the disparity between prompt blast damage and chronic radiological hazards, informing resilience thresholds without reliance on pre-test extrapolations.

Military and Strategic Implications

Validation of Nuclear Deterrence

The Operation Crossroads tests empirically demonstrated the capacity of atomic weapons to devastate naval fleets, thereby substantiating the deterrent value of the ' exclusive possession of such armaments from 1945 to 1949. The Able detonation on July 1, , an airburst at 520 feet yielding 23 kilotons, sank five target ships and severely damaged nine others through blast effects alone, underscoring the vulnerability of clustered surface vessels to overhead nuclear strikes. The subsequent Baker underwater burst on July 25, , at 90 feet depth, immediately sank eight vessels—including the battleship USS Arkansas and carrier USS Saratoga—while contaminating surviving ships with radioactive spray and base surge, proving a single bomb's potential to neutralize fleet operations via combined mechanical and radiological mechanisms. These outcomes bolstered arguments for prioritizing strategic nuclear bombing over reliance on battleship-centric naval forces, as the tests revealed atomic weapons' superior efficiency in fleet incapacitation compared to conventional ordnance. Post-test evaluations highlighted that nuclear effects extended beyond direct blast to include prolonged habitability issues from induced , challenging pre-war doctrines emphasizing armored capital ships and affirming air-delivered atomic strikes as a decisive warfighting . The Evaluation Board report concluded that maintaining U.S. atomic superiority was essential for , positioning nuclear capabilities as a credible counter to potential peer adversaries. Public announcement of the tests and sharing of declassified findings with allies reinforced the perceived credibility of U.S. nuclear monopoly, countering doubts about weapon reliability raised by and Nagasaki's urban contexts. Observed by international representatives, the demonstrations empirically validated atomic weapons' maritime destructive potential, deterring Soviet expansionist moves by evidencing high yield-to-damage ratios unattainable through conventional means during the U.S. lead in production and delivery. This awareness hastened recognition of an emerging arms competition, yet underscored America's temporary advantage in operationalizing nuclear deterrence against naval threats.

Shift in Naval Doctrine

The results of Operation Crossroads, particularly the sinking of eight target vessels immediately following the underwater Baker detonation on July 25, 1946, empirically demonstrated the of concentrated surface fleets to nuclear effects, undermining pre-test assumptions of naval . While the airburst Able test on July 1, 1946, sank only five ships—primarily smaller destroyers and auxiliaries due to blast and fire patterns—the Baker shot's shock waves, base surge, and radioactive spray capsized or holed larger capital ships like the USS Arkansas and carrier USS Saratoga, validating the obsolescence of dense battle lines reliant on . This data-driven evidence shifted doctrinal emphasis toward dispersed formations, prioritizing aircraft carriers for standoff projection and for stealthy, survivable operations, as surface combatants proved susceptible to even modest-yield weapons when aggregated. Baker's underwater burst provided critical insights into hydrodynamic and radiological propagation, informing (ASW) tactics by highlighting the amplified lethality of submerged explosions against hull integrity and propulsion systems. Shock mitigation studies from the test influenced subsequent ship hardening measures, such as enhanced compartmentalization and shock-mounted equipment, to counter underwater threats, while revealing the impracticality of decontaminating spray-contaminated vessels, which prompted reevaluation of fleet maneuvers in contested waters. These findings contributed to budgetary reallocations in the late 1940s, curtailing investments in modernization—no new battleships were authorized post-1946—and redirecting funds toward carrier-centric designs, reflecting realistic assessments of nuclear-era vulnerabilities over legacy platforms. Over the longer term, Crossroads evidence reinforced carrier dominance in doctrinal planning, as evidenced by U.S. Navy operations in the (1950–1953) and (1965–1973), where task forces operated dispersed with carriers providing primary strike capability, eschewing battleship-led formations in favor of air-centric, mobile strategies attuned to atomic threats. The tests' empirical validation of fleet dispersion and subsurface resilience shaped Cold War naval realism, prioritizing qualitative edges in mobility and projection over quantitative massing of surface assets.

Contributions to Future Weapon Development

The Baker detonation on July 25, 1946, generated the first observed instance of concentrated radioactive fallout from an underwater nuclear burst, yielding empirical data on contamination persistence and dispersion that refined predictive models for fallout patterns in subsequent fission and designs. This dataset highlighted the prolonged radiological hazards of surface or subsurface bursts, informing safety margins and environmental impact assessments for megaton-scale thermonuclear tests in the , where fallout volumes scaled nonlinearly with yield due to enhanced fission fractions. Decontamination efforts following the Baker shot, which rendered multiple vessels uninhabitable due to embedded radioactivity, produced practical techniques for surface washing and material isolation that were adapted for protocols and applied in later test site cleanups, such as those during in 1952. These methods emphasized causal factors like beta-gamma emission decay rates and saltwater-mediated leaching, providing a baseline for mitigating operational disruptions in delivery systems exposed to fallout. Exposure studies on animals aboard target ships, including goats and pigs subjected to the Able shot on July 1, 1946, documented acute syndromes and organ-specific damage thresholds, establishing early quantitative baselines for that guided standards and countermeasures in nuclear programs. Post-test autopsies quantified from doses exceeding 400 roentgens, correlating blast proximity with internal hemorrhaging and gastrointestinal failure, which informed predictive scaling for in higher-yield scenarios without relying solely on theoretical extrapolations. The series' yields of approximately 23 kilotons per device validated implosion-type fission bomb performance under operational conditions, enabling engineers to extrapolate hydrodynamic and neutronics behaviors to designs achieving 40-50 kilotons by 1948, with implications for efficient scaling toward tactical and strategic enhancements. Radiological controls, capping daily personnel exposure at 0.1 rem through monitored reentry protocols, standardized risk mitigation across future tests, minimizing non-combat losses and enhancing procedural reliability for complex multi-shot series.

Health, Environmental, and Human Impacts

Personnel Dosimetry and Long-Term Health Data

Dosimetry records from Operation Crossroads indicate that approximately 15 percent of the 42,000 Joint Task Force personnel, or about 6,600 individuals, were issued film-badge dosimeters to monitor gamma radiation exposure, with a total of around 18,875 badges distributed across the Able and Baker tests. Operations adhered to a daily exposure limit of 0.1 roentgens (R), equivalent to contemporary standards for tolerable gamma radiation without immediate biological harm, enforced through radiological surveys and restricted access to contaminated zones. Measured doses for most monitored personnel remained below 1 R total, reflecting effective distancing from detonation sites and prompt evacuation protocols that prevented acute radiation syndrome. Cleanup and decontamination crews, particularly those boarding target vessels post-Baker shot, encountered localized hotspots due to radioactive fallout adhering to ship surfaces and lagoon water, with some individuals exceeding 1 R during scrubbing operations. Internal exposure pathways, such as inhalation of fission products, were estimated via dose reconstruction models by the Defense Nuclear Agency (now DTRA), contributing marginally to total effective doses but remaining below thresholds for observable short-term effects. No widespread acute illnesses were documented, attributable to pre-test shielding, decontamination gear, and real-time monitoring by over 225 radiation instruments per detonation. Long-term health tracking through the Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) program and epidemiological cohorts spanning to the 1990s revealed no statistically significant elevation in overall mortality rates among Crossroads participants compared to matched non-exposed military peers, with death rates of 31.3 percent versus 30.8 percent by 1992. Cancer incidence, including leukemias and solid tumors, showed modest increases in some subgroups but lacked definitive causal attribution to after adjusting for confounders like age, prevalence, and lifestyle factors common to mid-20th-century service members. NTPR dose reconstructions, incorporating both external and internal pathways, supported findings that exposures were insufficient to produce detectable excess cancers beyond background rates in large-scale data up to the 2020s. The (), amended to include atomic veterans, provides lump-sum payments of up to $100,000 for specified radiogenic cancers among onsite participants, reflecting policy acknowledgment of exposure uncertainties rather than proven causation. Eligibility for Crossroads veterans requires verified presence and of 24 presumptive conditions, yet empirical studies emphasize that compensation addresses evidentiary gaps in historical without endorsing radiation as the primary driver of observed health outcomes.

Ecological Effects on Bikini Atoll

The underwater detonation on July 25, 1946, during Operation Crossroads resuspended fine sediments across much of 's lagoon, depositing a layer of silty material enriched with radionuclides over areas exceeding 1 square kilometer. This sedimentation altered benthic habitats temporarily, smothering some infaunal organisms and reducing light penetration for photosynthetic algae, though currents redistributed much of the material within weeks. Immediate blast effects included widespread fish kills, with shockwaves and thermal pulses killing marine life within a 3-5 kilometer radius of the ; post-test surveys documented dead fish, including surgeonfish exhibiting external radiation lesions, up to 4 miles from the site due to acute exposure and contaminated . Lagoon waters became temporarily radioactive from spray and base surge, leading to in and , but dilution via tidal flushing reduced soluble radionuclides like fission products to near-background levels within months. Long-term sediment cores reveal persistent (Pu-239) inventories, with surface layers retaining 17 terabecquerels from Crossroads and subsequent tests, bound in refractory particles that limit remobilization except in acidic conditions. However, Pu remains low due to strong to iron oxides and carbonates, constraining uptake into webs. Coral assemblages suffered initial fragmentation from Able's airburst shock and Baker's pressure wave, reducing live cover by up to 50% in proximal reefs, yet surveys from the onward show rebound, with 70% of zooxanthellate species recovering to pre-test diversity by the 1990s through larval recruitment from unaffected outer reefs. By 2010, reef biodiversity exceeded many undisturbed Pacific atolls, attributed to isolation limiting and short trophic chains that minimize of contaminants—apex predators like sharks exhibit Pu concentrations orders below dietary thresholds for chronic effects. Overall ecological impacts from Crossroads were localized to the lagoon's 600 square kilometers, with radionuclide fluxes dwarfed by natural cosmogenic isotopes like beryllium-7 over global scales; monitoring confirms no detectable propagation to extratropical ecosystems, as Pu half-life and sedimentation confine the signal.

Bikini Islanders' Displacement and Resettlement Outcomes

In February 1946, the approximately 167 residents of were relocated by the U.S. Navy to , about 125 miles to the east, to facilitate Operation Crossroads nuclear tests; the move included provisions of food, tools, and building materials intended to support self-sufficiency on the smaller, resource-scarce . By late 1946, severe food shortages emerged on Rongerik due to insufficient , limited , and unfamiliarity with local resources, leading to near-starvation conditions for the population by 1947. In March 1948, after two years of hardship, the malnourished islanders were temporarily housed in tents on Kwajalein Atoll before being transferred later that year to , a single-island lacking a for and supporting only a fraction of their previous population capacity. Efforts to resettle began in the late 1960s with U.S.-funded radiological surveys and scraping on some islands, allowing about 100 voluntary returnees to inhabit Enyu and islands starting in 1972; however, testing revealed elevated cesium-137 levels in coconuts and other staples, with concentrations in crops exceeding safe ingestion limits due to root uptake from contaminated . By 1978, health risks from chronic prompted evacuation, as in well water and cesium-137 in the posed cumulative doses far above thresholds for sustained population return. Subsequent assessments confirmed that while recovered sufficiently for low-risk diving, terrestrial remains partial at best, limited to short-term stays on select islands with imported and monitoring, as cesium-137 persists in with a 30-year , rendering traditional unviable without ongoing remediation. The displacement inflicted lasting cultural and economic disruptions, including loss of ancestral fishing grounds, communal structures, and self-reliance, exacerbated by inadequate initial aid provisioning and subsequent dependency on U.S. trust fund distributions from Kili, where and isolation compounded hardships. Legal actions culminated in the 1986 , which allocated $150 million in a nuclear compensation trust for atolls including , supplemented by Nuclear Claims Tribunal awards in the totaling over $500 million for Bikini-specific damages such as health impacts and lost productivity. Today, the descendant population exceeds 2,800, primarily residing on Kili and with minimal voluntary presence on Bikini for caretaking or tourism oversight, reflecting empirical barriers to full resettlement amid persistent radiological constraints and aid management challenges.

Controversies and Alternative Perspectives

Contemporary Criticisms and Opposition

Scientific skeptics, including , expressed reservations about the operation's value and methodology prior to its execution. Oppenheimer declined an invitation to attend and communicated to President Harry Truman that the tests would yield data of limited utility, advocating instead for mathematical modeling and scaled experiments as more efficient means of assessment. He further questioned the emphasis on naval-specific applications, deeming a purely military-oriented evaluation inappropriate given broader strategic priorities. Public apprehension was heightened by media coverage portraying nuclear fallout as a pervasive "radioactive " capable of long-term environmental and hazards, fueling debates over the tests' for both participants and distant populations. These fears were amplified amid postwar atomic anxiety, though official reports emphasized controlled radiological monitoring to limit exposures. Critics also targeted the financial and material costs, estimating losses from scuttled or sunk vessels—many deemed obsolete but with scrap value exceeding $15 million—at a significant waste of resources in peacetime. Proponents within the countered that such expenditures were justified by the imperative to gather empirical on atomic effects against naval assets, essential for maintaining fleet viability and deterrence credibility in an emerging nuclear era. Despite accusations of rushed preparation compromising thoroughness, naval advocates maintained the operation's necessity outweighed procedural critiques, as the resulting observations on blast, shockwave, and contamination dynamics validated adaptive doctrinal shifts and informed subsequent weapons programs.

Debates on Risk Assessment and Necessity

Prior to the Baker detonation on July 25, 1946, predictive models derived from airburst tests like Trinity (July 16, 1945) projected blast, thermal, and initial radiation effects on target vessels but inadequately accounted for prolonged contamination from an underwater burst, owing to the absence of prior empirical data on fission product dispersion in seawater. The Radiological Safety Section of Joint Task Force One anticipated gamma and beta hazards but forecasted decontamination feasible within days via hosing and scrubbing, underestimating the base surge—a hemispherical shock wave ejecting irradiated lagoon water up to 2,000 feet high—that coated ships with persistent fission debris, rendering many uninhabitable for weeks. This gap stemmed from fundamental unknowns in hydrodynamic mixing and aerosolization physics, not procedural negligence, as corroborated by post-test analyses confirming the event's novelty as the first underwater nuclear explosion. Risk protocols incorporated era-appropriate safeguards, including film badge dosimetry for approximately 20% of personnel in contaminated zones and strict exposure thresholds of 0.1 roentgen per day, aligned with prevailing radiological standards extrapolated from medical X-ray practices and wartime atomic projects. These measures reflected a calculated acceptance of uncertainties, consistent with military norms post-World War II, where incomplete knowledge of novel weapons necessitated field validation over theoretical caution; critiques invoking modern hindsight overlook that pre-Baker simulations lacked hydrodynamic scaling laws later refined through subsequent tests. The operation's empirical revelations—such as the inefficacy of surface decontamination against embedded isotopes—directly informed enhanced protocols for future series like (1948), prioritizing standoff distances and agents. The necessity of Crossroads arose from the imperative to quantify atomic effects on fleet assets, ensuring U.S. naval readiness against potential peer adversaries amid intelligence on Soviet atomic espionage; decrypted Venona cables by early 1946 revealed extensive penetration of the , including transfers of implosion designs that accelerated Moscow's program beyond indigenous capabilities. Forgoing tests risked doctrinal obsolescence, as unverified assumptions about ship hardening could leave forces vulnerable in a conflict where atomic delivery via bombers or carriers demanded validated countermeasures; advocates emphasized this to counter Air Forces' push for air-centric supremacy, with Joint Chiefs approval on January 9, 1946, underscoring strategic consensus. Absent such experimentation, U.S. superiority—holding the sole atomic arsenal until the Soviet test on August 29, 1949—might have eroded faster through asymmetric intelligence gains, justifying calibrated risks in an era of zero-sum deterrence.

Veteran Experiences and Compensation Claims

Veterans participating in Operation Crossroads, numbering approximately 42,000 personnel across Joint Task Force One, provided numerous oral histories recounting the visual spectacle of the Able and Baker detonations on July 1 and 25, 1946, respectively. Accounts often described profound awe at the blasts' scale, with one recalling the Able shot's fireball as "brighter than the sun" and producing a shockwave that rocked distant ships, while the underwater Baker test generated massive water columns and radioactive mist that enveloped the fleet. These firsthand testimonies, preserved in declassified naval records and interviews, emphasized immediate operational duties like ship amid fallout, but retrospective narratives frequently linked subsequent personal health declines—such as cancers, skin conditions, and fatigue—to . Post-service surveys of Crossroads participants revealed high rates of self-reported ailments, with one 1970s study by Navy veteran Lincoln Grahlfs polling 376 atomic test participants (including Crossroads personnel) where about 50% described chronic illnesses potentially attributable to , though causation remained anecdotal without controlled epidemiological validation. Aggregate health data from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) program, analyzing declassified , indicated median external exposures below 1 rem for most personnel—levels comparable to multiple diagnostic X-rays rather than acute Hiroshima-scale doses exceeding 100 rem. Internal uptake via or was similarly reconstructed as minimal, with supervision enforcing a 0.1 roentgen daily limit, and only 15% of the force (around 6,600 individuals) issued film badges showing readings under tolerance thresholds. Verified cancer incidence among Crossroads veterans did not deviate significantly from general population baselines in longitudinal reviews, underscoring that while individual experiences warranted , empirical rejected narratives of widespread radiological catastrophe. Compensation claims by Crossroads "atomic veterans" faced initial U.S. Department of (VA) denials through the 1970s, as service-connection required proving direct causation amid limited dose records, with many appeals citing lymphosarcoma or other malignancies dismissed for insufficient evidence linking to Bikini exposures. Legislative expansions in the 1980s, including the Veterans' Dioxin and Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and VA recognition of "radiation-exposed veterans" under 38 CFR § 3.309(d), facilitated presumptive service-connection for specified radiogenic cancers without proving dose-response, enabling thousands of claims; by the 1990s, NTPR dose reconstructions supported approvals for eligible survivors, though aggregate approvals remained below 20% for non-presumptive conditions due to dosimetry constraints. These processes, informed by Defense Nuclear Agency reconstructions, affirmed valid veteran testimonies as bases for policy relief while empirical data constrained broad liability attributions.

References

  1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crossroads_Radioactive_Puffy_Surgeon_Fish.jpg
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.