Hubbry Logo
PyrolysisPyrolysisMain
Open search
Pyrolysis
Community hub
Pyrolysis
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Burning pieces of wood, showing various stages of pyrolysis followed by oxidative combustion

Pyrolysis (/paɪˈrɒlɪsɪs/; from Ancient Greek πῦρ pûr 'fire' and λύσις lýsis 'separation') is a process involving the separation of covalent bonds in organic matter by thermal decomposition within an inert environment without oxygen.[1][2][3]

Applications

[edit]

Pyrolysis is most commonly used in the treatment of organic materials. It is one of the processes involved in the charring of wood.[4] In general, pyrolysis of organic substances produces volatile products and leaves char, a carbon-rich solid residue. Extreme pyrolysis, which leaves mostly carbon as the residue, is called carbonization. Pyrolysis is considered one of the steps in the processes of gasification or combustion.[5][6] Compared to syngas, pyrolysis gas has a high percentage of heavy tar fractions, which condense at relatively high temperatures, preventing its direct use in gas burners and internal combustion engines.

The process is used heavily in the chemical industry, for example, to produce ethylene, many forms of carbon, and other chemicals from petroleum, coal, and even wood, or to produce coke from coal. It is used also in the conversion of natural gas (primarily methane) into hydrogen gas and solid carbon char, recently introduced on an industrial scale.[7] Aspirational applications of pyrolysis would convert biomass into syngas and biochar, waste plastics back into usable oil, or waste into safely disposable substances.

Terminology

[edit]

Pyrolysis is one of the various types of chemical degradation processes that occur at higher temperatures (above the boiling point of water or other solvents). It differs from other processes like combustion and hydrolysis in that it usually does not involve the addition of other reagents such as oxygen (O
2, in combustion) or water (in hydrolysis).[8] Pyrolysis produces solids (char), condensable liquids (heavy and light oils, and tar), and non-condensable gasses.[9][10][11][12]

Pyrolysis is different from gasification. In the chemical process industry, pyrolysis refers to a partial thermal degradation of carbonaceous materials that takes place in an inert (oxygen free) atmosphere and produces both gases, liquids and solids. The pyrolysis can be extended to full gasification that produces mainly gaseous output,[13] often with the addition of e.g. water steam to gasify residual carbonic solids, see Steam reforming.

Types

[edit]

Specific types of pyrolysis include:


Other pyrolysis types come from a different classification that focuses on the pyrolysis operating conditions and heating system used, which have an impact on the yield of the pyrolysis products.

Pyrolysis Operating conditions Pyrolysis product yield (wt%)
Slow low temperature pyrolysis[15] Temperature: 250–450 °C

Vapor residence time: 10–100 min

Heating rate: 0.1–1 °C/s

Feedstock size: 5–50 mm

Bio-oil ~30

Biochar~35

Gases~35

Intermediate pyrolysis[16] Temperature: 600–800 °C

Vapor residence time: 0.5–20 s

Heating rate: 1.0–10 °C/s

Feedstock size: 1–5 mm

Bio-oil~50

Biochar~25

Gases~35

Fast low temperature pyrolysis[15] Temperature: 250–450°C

Vapor residence time: 0.5–5 s

Heating rate: 10–200 °C/s

Feedstock size: <3 mm

Bio-oil ~50

Biochar~20

Gases~30

Flash pyrolysis[15] Temperature: 800–1000 °C

Vapor residence time: <5 s

Heating rate: >1000 °C/s

Feedstock size: <0.2 mm

Bio-oil ~75

Biochar~12

Gases~13

Hydro pyrolysis[16] Temperature: 350–600 °C

Vapor residence time: >15 s

Heating rate: 10–300 °C/s

Not assigned
High temperature pyrolysis Temperature: 800–1150 °C

Vapor residence time: 10–100 min

Heating rate: 0.1–1 °C/s

Bio-oil ~43

Biochar~22

Gases~45

History

[edit]
Oak charcoal

Pyrolysis has been used for turning wood into charcoal since ancient times. The ancient Egyptians used the liquid fraction obtained from the pyrolysis of cedar wood in their embalming process.[17]

The dry distillation of wood remained the major source of methanol into the early 20th century.[18] Pyrolysis was instrumental in the discovery of many chemical substances, such as phosphorus from ammonium sodium hydrogen phosphate NH4NaHPO4 in concentrated urine, oxygen from mercuric oxide, and various nitrates.[citation needed]

General processes and mechanisms

[edit]
Processes in the thermal degradation of organic matter at atmospheric pressure

Pyrolysis generally consists of heating the material above its decomposition temperature, breaking chemical bonds in its molecules. The fragments usually become smaller molecules, but may combine to produce residues with larger molecular mass, even amorphous covalent solids.[citation needed]

In many settings, some amounts of oxygen, water, or other substances may be present, so that combustion, hydrolysis, or other chemical processes may occur besides pyrolysis proper. Sometimes those chemicals are added intentionally, as in the burning of firewood, in the traditional manufacture of charcoal, and in the steam cracking of crude oil.[citation needed]

Conversely, the starting material may be heated in a vacuum or in an inert atmosphere to avoid chemical side reactions (such as combustion or hydrolysis). Pyrolysis in a vacuum also lowers the boiling point of the byproducts, improving their recovery.

When organic matter is heated at increasing temperatures in open containers, the following processes generally occur, in successive or overlapping stages:[citation needed]

  • Below about 100 °C, volatiles, including some water, evaporate. Heat-sensitive substances, such as vitamin C and proteins, may partially change or decompose already at this stage.
  • At about 100 °C or slightly higher, any remaining water that is merely absorbed in the material is driven off. This process consumes a lot of energy, so the temperature may stop rising until all water has evaporated. Water trapped in crystal structure of hydrates may come off at somewhat higher temperatures.
  • Some solid substances, like fats, waxes, and sugars, may melt and separate.
  • Between 100 and 500 °C, many common organic molecules break down. Most sugars start decomposing at 160–180 °C. Cellulose, a major component of wood, paper,& and cotton fabrics, decomposes at about 350 °C.[5] Lignin, another major wood component, starts decomposing at about 350 °C, but continues releasing volatile products up to 500 °C.[5] The decomposition products usually include water, carbon monoxide CO and/or carbon dioxide CO2, as well as a large number of organic compounds.[6][19] Gases and volatile products leave the sample, and some of them may condense again as smoke. Generally, this process also absorbs energy. Some volatiles may ignite and burn, creating a visible flame. The non-volatile residues typically become richer in carbon and form large disordered molecules, with colors ranging between brown and black. At this point the matter is said to have been "charred" or "carbonized".
  • At 200–300 °C, if oxygen has not been excluded, the carbonaceous residue may start to burn, in a highly exothermic reaction, often with no or little visible flame. Once carbon combustion starts, the temperature rises spontaneously, turning the residue into a glowing ember and releasing carbon dioxide and/or monoxide. At this stage, some of the nitrogen still remaining in the residue may be oxidized into nitrogen oxides like NO2 and N2O3. Sulfur and other elements like chlorine and arsenic may be oxidized and volatilized at this stage.
  • Once combustion of the carbonaceous residue is complete, a powdery or solid mineral residue (ash) is often left behind, consisting of inorganic oxidized materials of high melting point. Some of the ash may have left during combustion, entrained by the gases as fly ash or particulate emissions. Metals present in the original matter usually remain in the ash as oxides or carbonates, such as potash. Phosphorus, from materials such as bone, phospholipids, and nucleic acids, usually remains as phosphates.

Safety challenges

[edit]

Because pyrolysis takes place at high temperatures which exceed the autoignition temperature of the produced gases, an explosion risk exists if oxygen is present. Careful temperature control is needed for pyrolysis systems, which can be accomplished with pyrolysis controller.[20] Pyrolysis also produces various toxic gases, such as carbon monoxide. The greatest risk of fire, explosion, and release of toxic gases comes when the system is starting up and shutting down, operating intermittently, or during operational upsets.[21]

Inert gas purging is essential to manage inherent explosion risks. The procedure is not trivial and failure to keep oxygen out has led to accidents.[22]

Occurrence and uses

[edit]

Clandestine chemistry

[edit]
See also: Clandestine chemistry § Pyrolysis

Conversion of CBD to THC can be brought about by pyrolysis.[23][24]

Cooking

[edit]
Brownish onions with carrots and celery in a frying pan.
Caramelized onions are slightly pyrolyzed.
A blacked bent disc, barely recognizible as a pizza, standing up stiffly from a (fresh, white) plate
This pizza is pyrolyzed, almost completely carbonized.

Pyrolysis has many applications in food preparation.[25] Caramelization is the pyrolysis of sugars in food (often after the sugars have been produced by the breakdown of polysaccharides). The food goes brown and changes flavor. The distinctive flavors are used in many dishes; for instance, caramelized onion is used in French onion soup.[26][27] The temperatures needed for caramelization lie above the boiling point of water.[26] Frying oil can easily rise above the boiling point. Putting a lid on the frying pan keeps the water in, re-condensing some and keeping the temperature too cool to brown.

Pyrolysis of food can also be undesirable, as in the charring of burnt food (at temperatures too low for the oxidative combustion of carbon to produce flames and burn the food to ash).

Coke, carbon, charcoals, and chars

[edit]
Charcoal briquettes, often made from compressed sawdust or similar, in use

Carbon and carbon-rich materials have desirable properties but are nonvolatile, even at high temperatures. Consequently, pyrolysis is used to produce many kinds of carbon; these can be used for fuel, as reagents in steelmaking (coke), and as structural materials.

Charcoal is a less smoky fuel than pyrolyzed wood.[28] Some cities ban, or used to ban, wood fires; when residents only use charcoal (and similarly treated rock coal, called coke) air pollution is significantly reduced. In cities where people do not generally cook or heat with fires, this is not needed. In the mid-20th century, "smokeless" legislation in Europe required cleaner-burning techniques, such as coke fuel[29] and smoke-burning incinerators[30] as an effective measure to reduce air pollution.[29]

A blacksmith's forge, with a blower forcing air through a bed of fuel to raise the temperature of the fire. On the periphery, coal is pyrolyzed, absorbing heat; the coke at the center is almost pure carbon, and releases a lot of heat when the carbon oxidizes.
Typical organic products obtained by pyrolysis of coal (X = CH, N)

The coke-making or "coking" process consists of heating the material in "coking ovens" to very high temperatures (up to 900 °C or 1,700 °F) so that the molecules are broken down into lighter volatile substances, which leave the vessel, and a porous but hard residue that is mostly carbon and inorganic ash. The amount of volatiles varies with the source material, but is typically 25–30% of it by weight. High temperature pyrolysis is used on an industrial scale to convert coal into coke. This is useful in metallurgy, where the higher temperatures are necessary for many processes, such as steelmaking. Volatile by-products of this process are also often useful, including benzene and pyridine.[31] Coke can also be produced from the solid residue left from petroleum refining.

The original vascular structure of the wood and the pores created by escaping gases combine to produce a light and porous material. By starting with a dense wood-like material, such as nutshells or peach stones, one obtains a form of charcoal with particularly fine pores (and hence a much larger pore surface area), called activated carbon, which is used as an adsorbent for a wide range of chemical substances.

Biochar is the residue of incomplete organic pyrolysis, e.g., from cooking fires. It is a key component of the terra preta soils associated with ancient indigenous communities of the Amazon basin.[32] Terra preta is much sought by local farmers for its superior fertility and capacity to promote and retain an enhanced suite of beneficial microbiota, compared to the typical red soil of the region. Efforts are underway to recreate these soils through biochar, the solid residue of pyrolysis of various materials, mostly organic waste.

Carbon fibers produced by pyrolyzing a silk cocoon. Electron micrograph, scale bar at bottom left shows 100 μm.

Carbon fibers are filaments of carbon that can be used to make very strong yarns and textiles. Carbon fiber items are often produced by spinning and weaving the desired item from fibers of a suitable polymer, and then pyrolyzing the material at a high temperature (from 1,500–3,000 °C or 2,730–5,430 °F). The first carbon fibers were made from rayon, but polyacrylonitrile has become the most common starting material. For their first workable electric lamps, Joseph Wilson Swan and Thomas Edison used carbon filaments made by pyrolysis of cotton yarns and bamboo splinters, respectively.

Pyrolysis is the reaction used to coat a preformed substrate with a layer of pyrolytic carbon. This is typically done in a fluidized bed reactor heated to 1,000–2,000 °C or 1,830–3,630 °F. Pyrolytic carbon coatings are used in many applications, including artificial heart valves.[33]

Liquid and gaseous biofuels

[edit]
See also: Biofuel

Pyrolysis is the basis of several methods for producing fuel from biomass, i.e. lignocellulosic biomass.[34] Crops studied as biomass feedstock for pyrolysis include native North American prairie grasses such as switchgrass and bred versions of other grasses such as Miscantheus giganteus. Other sources of organic matter as feedstock for pyrolysis include greenwaste, sawdust, waste wood, leaves, vegetables, nut shells, straw, cotton trash, rice hulls, and orange peels.[5] Animal waste including poultry litter, dairy manure, and potentially other manures are also under evaluation. Some industrial byproducts are also suitable feedstock including paper sludge, distillers grain,[35] and sewage sludge.[36]

In the biomass components, the pyrolysis of hemicellulose happens between 210 and 310 °C.[5] The pyrolysis of cellulose starts from 300 to 315 °C and ends at 360–380 °C, with a peak at 342–354 °C.[5] Lignin starts to decompose at about 200 °C and continues until 1000 °C.[37]

Synthetic diesel fuel by pyrolysis of organic materials is not yet economically competitive.[38] Higher efficiency is sometimes achieved by flash pyrolysis, in which finely divided feedstock is quickly heated to between 350 and 500 °C (660 and 930 °F) for less than two seconds.

Syngas is usually produced by pyrolysis.[25]

The low quality of oils produced through pyrolysis can be improved by physical and chemical processes,[39] which might drive up production costs, but may make sense economically as circumstances change.

There is also the possibility of integrating with other processes such as mechanical biological treatment and anaerobic digestion.[40] Fast pyrolysis is also investigated for biomass conversion.[41] Fuel bio-oil can also be produced by hydrous pyrolysis.

Methane pyrolysis for hydrogen

[edit]
Illustrating inputs and outputs of methane pyrolysis, an efficient one-step process to produce hydrogen and no greenhouse gas

Methane pyrolysis[42] is an industrial process for "turquoise" hydrogen production from methane by removing solid carbon from natural gas.[43] This one-step process produces hydrogen in high volume at low cost (less than steam reforming with carbon sequestration).[44] No greenhouse gas is released. No deep well injection of carbon dioxide is needed. Only water is released when hydrogen is used as the fuel for fuel-cell electric heavy truck transportation, [45][46][47][48][49] gas turbine electric power generation,[50][51] and hydrogen for industrial processes including producing ammonia fertilizer and cement.[52][53] Methane pyrolysis is the process operating around 1065 °C for producing hydrogen from natural gas that allows removal of carbon easily (solid carbon is a byproduct of the process).[54][55] The industrial quality solid carbon can then be sold or landfilled and is not released into the atmosphere, avoiding emission of greenhouse gas (GHG) or ground water pollution from a landfill.

In 2015, a company called Monolith Materials built a pilot plant in Redwood City, CA to study scaling Methane Pyrolysis using renewable power in the process.[56] A successful pilot project then led to a larger commercial-scale demonstration plant in Hallam, Nebraska in 2016.[57] As of 2020, this plant is operational and can produce around 14 metric tons of hydrogen per day.  In 2021, the US Department of Energy backed Monolith Materials' plans for major expansion with a $1B loan guarantee.[58] The funding will help produce a plant capable of generating 164 metric tons of hydrogen per day by 2024. Pilots with gas utilities and biogas plants are underway with companies like Modern Hydrogen.[59][60] Volume production is also being evaluated in the BASF "methane pyrolysis at scale" pilot plant,[7] the chemical engineering team at University of California - Santa Barbara[61] and in such research laboratories as Karlsruhe Liquid-metal Laboratory (KALLA).[62] Power for process heat consumed is only one-seventh of the power consumed in the water electrolysis method for producing hydrogen.[63]

The Australian company Hazer Group was founded in 2010 to commercialise technology originally developed at the University of Western Australia.  The company was listed on the ASX in December 2015. It is completing a commercial demonstration project to produce renewable hydrogen and graphite from wastewater and iron ore as a process catalyst use technology created by the University of Western Australia (UWA). The Commercial Demonstration Plant project is an Australian first, and expected to produce around 100 tonnes of fuel-grade hydrogen and 380 tonnes of graphite each year starting in 2023.[citation needed] It was scheduled to commence in 2022. "10 December 2021: Hazer Group (ASX: HZR) regret to advise that there has been a delay to the completion of the fabrication of the reactor for the Hazer Commercial Demonstration Project (CDP). This is expected to delay the planned commissioning of the Hazer CDP, with commissioning now expected to occur after our current target date of 1Q 2022."[64] The Hazer Group has collaboration agreements with Engie for a facility in France in May 2023,[65] A Memorandum of Understanding with Chubu Electric & Chiyoda in Japan April 2023[66] and an agreement with Suncor Energy and FortisBC to develop 2,500 tonnes per Annum Burrard-Hazer Hydrogen Production Plant in Canada April 2022[67][68]

The American company C-Zero's technology converts natural gas into hydrogen and solid carbon. The hydrogen provides clean, low-cost energy on demand, while the carbon can be permanently sequestered.[69] C-Zero announced in June 2022 that it closed a $34 million financing round led by SK Gas, a subsidiary of South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, the SK Group. SK Gas was joined by two other new investors, Engie New Ventures and Trafigura, one of the world's largest physical commodities trading companies, in addition to participation from existing investors including Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Eni Next, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and AP Ventures. Funding was for C-Zero's first pilot plant, which was expected to be online in Q1 2023. The plant may be capable of producing up to 400 kg of hydrogen per day from natural gas with no CO2 emissions.[70]

One of the world's largest chemical companies, BASF, has been researching hydrogen pyrolysis for more than 10 years.[71]

Ethylene

[edit]

Pyrolysis is used to produce ethylene, the chemical compound produced on the largest scale industrially (>110 million tons/year in 2005). In this process, hydrocarbons from petroleum are heated to around 600 °C (1,112 °F) in the presence of steam; this is called steam cracking. The resulting ethylene is used to make antifreeze (ethylene glycol), PVC (via vinyl chloride), and many other polymers, such as polyethylene and polystyrene.[72]

Semiconductors

[edit]
Illustration of the metalorganic vapour phase epitaxy process, which entails pyrolysis of volatiles

The process of metalorganic vapour-phase epitaxy (MOCVD) entails pyrolysis of volatile organometallic compounds to give semiconductors, hard coatings, and other applicable materials. The reactions entail thermal degradation of precursors, with deposition of the inorganic component and release of the hydrocarbons as gaseous waste. Since it is an atom-by-atom deposition, these atoms organize themselves into crystals to form the bulk semiconductor. Raw polycrystalline silicon is produced by the chemical vapor deposition of silane gases:

SiH4 → Si + 2 H2

Gallium arsenide, another semiconductor, forms upon co-pyrolysis of trimethylgallium and arsine.

Waste management

[edit]
See also: Thermal depolymerization

Pyrolysis can also be used to treat municipal solid waste and plastic waste.[6][19][73] The main advantage is the reduction in volume of the waste. In principle, pyrolysis will regenerate the monomers (precursors) to the polymers that are treated, but in practice the process is neither a clean nor an economically competitive source of monomers.[74][75][76]

In tire waste management, tire pyrolysis is a well-developed technology.[77] Other products from car tire pyrolysis include steel wires, carbon black and bitumen.[78] The area faces legislative, economic, and marketing obstacles.[79] Oil derived from tire rubber pyrolysis has a high sulfur content, which gives it high potential as a pollutant; consequently it should be desulfurized.[80][81]

Alkaline pyrolysis of sewage sludge at low temperature of 500 °C can enhance H
2 production with in-situ carbon capture. The use of NaOH (sodium hydroxide) has the potential to produce H
2-rich gas that can be used for fuels cells directly.[36][82]

In early November 2021, the U.S. State of Georgia announced a joint effort with Igneo Technologies to build an $85 million large electronics recycling plant in the Port of Savannah. The project will focus on lower-value, plastics-heavy devices in the waste stream using multiple shredders and furnaces using pyrolysis technology.[83]

Waste from pyrolysis itself can also be used for useful products. For example, contaminant-rich retentate from liquid-fed pyrolysis of postconsumer multilayer packaging waste can be used as novel building composite materials, which have higher compression strengths (10–12 MPa) than construction bricks and brickworks (7 MPa), as well as 57% lower density, 0.77 g/cm3.[84]

One-stepwise pyrolysis and two-stepwise pyrolysis for tobacco waste

[edit]

Pyrolysis has also been used in trying to mitigate tobacco waste. One method was done where tobacco waste was separated into two categories, TLW (Tobacco Leaf Waste) and TSW (Tobacco Stick Waste). TLW was determined to be any waste from cigarettes and TSW was determined to be any waste from electronic cigarettes. Both TLW and TSW were dried at 80 °C for 24 hours and stored in a desiccator.[85] Samples were grounded so that the contents were uniform. Tobacco Waste (TW) also contains inorganic (metal) contents, which was determined using an inductively coupled plasma-optical spectrometer.[85] Thermo-gravimetric analysis was used to thermally degrade four samples (TLW, TSW, glycerol, and guar gum) and monitored under specific dynamic temperature conditions.[85] About one gram of both TLW and TSW were used in the pyrolysis tests. During these analysis tests, CO
2 and N
2 were used as atmospheres inside of a tubular reactor that was built using quartz tubing. For both CO
2 and N
2 atmospheres the flow rate was 100 mL min−1.[85] External heating was created via a tubular furnace. The pyrogenic products were classified into three phases. The first phase was biochar, a solid residue produced by the reactor at 650 °C. The second phase liquid hydrocarbons were collected by a cold solvent trap and sorted by using chromatography. The third and final phase was analyzed using an online micro GC unit and those pyrolysates were gases.

Two different types of experiments were conducted: one-stepwise pyrolysis and two-stepwise pyrolysis. One-stepwise pyrolysis consisted of a constant heating rate (10 °C min−1) from 30 to 720 °C.[85] In the second step of the two-stepwise pyrolysis test the pyrolysates from the one-stepwise pyrolysis were pyrolyzed in the second heating zone which was controlled isothermally at 650 °C.[85] The two-stepwise pyrolysis was used to focus primarily on how well CO
2 affects carbon redistribution when adding heat through the second heating zone.[85]

First noted was the thermolytic behaviors of TLW and TSW in both the CO
2 and N
2 environments. For both TLW and TSW the thermolytic behaviors were identical at less than or equal to 660 °C in the CO
2 and N
2 environments. The differences between the environments start to occur when temperatures increase above 660 °C and the residual mass percentages significantly decrease in the CO
2 environment compared to that in the N
2 environment.[85] This observation is likely due to the Boudouard reaction, where we see spontaneous gasification happening when temperatures exceed 710 °C.[86][87] Although these observations were seen at temperatures lower than 710 °C it is most likely due to the catalytic capabilities of inorganics in TLW.[85] It was further investigated by doing ICP-OES measurements and found that a fifth of the residual mass percentage was Ca species. CaCO
3 is used in cigarette papers and filter material, leading to the explanation that degradation of CaCO
3 causes pure CO
2 reacting with CaO in a dynamic equilibrium state.[85] This being the reason for seeing mass decay between 660 °C and 710 °C. Differences in differential thermogram (DTG) peaks for TLW were compared to TSW. TLW had four distinctive peaks at 87, 195, 265, and 306 °C whereas TSW had two major drop offs at 200 and 306 °C with one spike in between.[85] The four peaks indicated that TLW contains more diverse types of additives than TSW.[85] The residual mass percentage between TLW and TSW was further compared, where the residual mass in TSW was less than that of TLW for both CO
2 and N
2 environments concluding that TSW has higher quantities of additives than TLW. 

Production of hydrogen, methane, and tars when creating biochar

The one-stepwise pyrolysis experiment showed different results for the CO
2 and N
2 environments. During this process the evolution of 5 different notable gases were observed. Hydrogen, Methane, Ethane, Carbon Dioxide, and Ethylene all are produced when the thermolytic rate of TLW began to be retarded at greater than or equal to 500 °C. Thermolytic rate begins at the same temperatures for both the CO
2 and N
2 environment but there is higher concentration of the production of Hydrogen, Ethane, Ethylene, and Methane in the N
2 environment than that in the CO
2 environment. The concentration of CO in the CO
2 environment is significantly greater as temperatures increase past 600 °C and this is due to CO
2 being liberated from CaCO
3 in TLW.[85] This significant increase in CO concentration is why there is lower concentrations of other gases produced in the CO
2 environment due to a dilution effect.[85] Since pyrolysis is the re-distribution of carbons in carbon substrates into three pyrogenic products.[85] The CO
2 environment is going to be more effective because the CO
2 reduction into CO allows for the oxidation of pyrolysates to form CO. In conclusion the CO
2 environment allows a higher yield of gases than oil and biochar. When the same process is done for TSW the trends are almost identical therefore the same explanations can be applied to the pyrolysis of TSW.[85]

Harmful chemicals were reduced in the CO
2 environment due to CO formation causing tar to be reduced. One-stepwise pyrolysis was not that effective on activating CO
2 on carbon rearrangement due to the high quantities of liquid pyrolysates (tar). Two-stepwise pyrolysis for the CO
2 environment allowed for greater concentrations of gases due to the second heating zone. The second heating zone was at a consistent temperature of 650 °C isothermally.[85] More reactions between CO
2 and gaseous pyrolysates with longer residence time meant that CO
2 could further convert pyrolysates into CO.[85] The results showed that the two-stepwise pyrolysis was an effective way to decrease tar content and increase gas concentration by about 10 wt.% for both TLW (64.20 wt.%) and TSW (73.71%).[85]

Thermal cleaning

[edit]
See also: Thermal cleaning

Pyrolysis is also used for thermal cleaning, an industrial application to remove organic substances such as polymers, plastics and coatings from parts, products or production components like extruder screws, spinnerets[88] and static mixers. During the thermal cleaning process, at temperatures from 310 to 540 °C (600 to 1,000 °F),[89] organic material is converted by pyrolysis and oxidation into volatile organic compounds, hydrocarbons and carbonized gas.[90] Inorganic elements remain.[91]

Several types of thermal cleaning systems use pyrolysis:

  • Molten Salt Baths belong to the oldest thermal cleaning systems; cleaning with a molten salt bath is very fast but implies the risk of dangerous splatters, or other potential hazards connected with the use of salt baths, like explosions or highly toxic hydrogen cyanide gas.[89]
  • Fluidized Bed Systems[92] use sand or aluminium oxide as heating medium;[93] these systems also clean very fast but the medium does not melt or boil, nor emit any vapors or odors;[89] the cleaning process takes one to two hours.[90]
  • Vacuum Ovens use pyrolysis in a vacuum[94] avoiding uncontrolled combustion inside the cleaning chamber;[89] the cleaning process takes 8[90] to 30 hours.[95]
  • Burn-Off Ovens, also known as Heat-Cleaning Ovens, are gas-fired and used in the painting, coatings, electric motors and plastics industries for removing organics from heavy and large metal parts.[96]

Fine chemical synthesis

[edit]

Pyrolysis is used in the production of chemical compounds, mainly, but not only, in the research laboratory.

The area of boron-hydride clusters started with the study of the pyrolysis of diborane (B
2H
6) at ca. 200 °C. Products include the clusters pentaborane and decaborane. These pyrolyses involve not only cracking (to give H
2), but also recondensation.[97]

The synthesis of nanoparticles,[98] zirconia[99] and oxides[100] utilizing an ultrasonic nozzle in a process called ultrasonic spray pyrolysis (USP).

Other uses and occurrences

[edit]
  • Pyrolysis is used to turn organic materials into carbon for the purpose of carbon-14 dating.
  • Pyrolysis liquids from slow pyrolysis of bark and hemp have been tested for their antifungal activity against wood decaying fungi, showing potential to substitute the current wood preservatives[101] while further tests are still required. However, their ecotoxicity is very variable and while some are less toxic than current wood preservatives, other pyrolysis liquids have shown high ecotoxicity, what may cause detrimental effects in the environment.[102]
  • Pyrolysis of tobacco, paper, and additives, in cigarettes and other products, generates many volatile products (including nicotine, carbon monoxide, and tar) that are responsible for the aroma and negative health effects of smoking. Similar considerations apply to the smoking of marijuana and the burning of incense products and mosquito coils.
  • Pyrolysis occurs during the incineration of trash, potentially generating volatiles that are toxic or contribute to air pollution if not completely burned.
  • Laboratory or industrial equipment sometimes gets fouled by carbonaceous residues that result from coking, the pyrolysis of organic products that come into contact with hot surfaces.

PAHs generation

[edit]

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) can be generated from the pyrolysis of different solid waste fractions,[12] such as hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin, pectin, starch, polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). PS, PVC, and lignin generate significant amount of PAHs. Naphthalene is the most abundant PAH among all the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.[103]

When the temperature is increased from 500 to 900 °C, most PAHs increase. With increasing temperature, the percentage of light PAHs decreases and the percentage of heavy PAHs increases.[104][105]

Study tools

[edit]

Thermogravimetric analysis

[edit]

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is one of the most common techniques to investigate pyrolysis with no limitations of heat and mass transfer. The results can be used to determine mass loss kinetics.[5][19][6][37][73] Activation energies can be calculated using the Kissinger method or peak analysis-least square method (PA-LSM).[6][37]

TGA can couple with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and mass spectrometry. As the temperature increases, the volatiles generated from pyrolysis can be measured.[106][82]

Macro-TGA

[edit]

In TGA, the sample is loaded first before the increase of temperature, and the heating rate is low (less than 100 °C min−1). Macro-TGA can use gram-scale samples to investigate the effects of pyrolysis with mass and heat transfer.[6][107]

Pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

[edit]

Pyrolysis mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) is an important laboratory procedure to determine the structure of compounds.[108][109]

Machine learning

[edit]

In recent years, machine learning has attracted significant research interest in predicting yields, optimizing parameters, and monitoring pyrolytic processes.[110][111]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pyrolysis

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Pyrolysis is the thermochemical decomposition of organic materials at elevated s, typically ranging from 400 to 800 °C, in the absence of oxygen or other . This involves the breaking of covalent bonds in complex molecules, yielding a of products including combustible gases such as , condensable liquids like or , and solid residues such as or char. The specific yields and compositions depend on factors including feedstock type, , heating rate, , and pressure, with slower heating favoring char production and rapid heating maximizing liquid yields. Historically applied in production from wood, pyrolysis has evolved into a versatile technology for and . Key variants include slow pyrolysis for , fast pyrolysis optimized for bio-oil at temperatures around 500 °C and short vapor residence times, and flash or ultra-fast pyrolysis for maximal gas production. Contemporary applications encompass biomass-to-fuel conversion, plastic waste recycling into hydrocarbons, tire pyrolysis for oil and recovery, and pyrolysis as a low-emission route to and solid carbon. Unlike or , pyrolysis avoids oxidation, preserving carbon in non-gaseous forms and enabling tunable product spectra for , materials, and chemical feedstocks.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Pyrolysis is a thermochemical process involving the of organic materials at elevated temperatures in the absence of oxygen or other oxidizing agents. This breaks down complex molecules into simpler compounds, primarily yielding solid char, liquid bio-oil, and non-condensable gases such as . The process occurs under inert atmospheres like or to prevent , typically at temperatures ranging from 400°C to over 800°C depending on the feedstock and desired products. The fundamental principle of pyrolysis relies on heat-induced cleavage of covalent bonds within the feedstock, leading to endothermic reactions that favor , fragmentation, and secondary cracking. Primary products form through initial devolatilization, where volatile components are released, followed by potential secondary reactions that alter yields based on and temperature. Key parameters influencing the process include heating rate, which affects product distribution—slow pyrolysis maximizes char (up to 35% yield), while fast pyrolysis prioritizes liquids (50-75% bio-oil)—and , generally atmospheric but variable in specialized applications. Pyrolysis kinetics follow Arrhenius behavior, with activation energies typically 100-250 kJ/mol for , governed by multi-step mechanisms involving parallel and consecutive reactions. As the initial stage in thermochemical conversion pathways like and , pyrolysis enables from , plastics, and wastes without external oxygen, promoting energy efficiency and reducing emissions compared to oxidative processes. The inert environment ensures that proceeds via free radical or ionic pathways rather than oxidation, preserving carbon structures in char while volatilizing hydrogen-rich fractions. Empirical data from confirm staged weight loss: dehydration below 200°C, at 200-500°C, and char formation above 500°C.

Terminology

Pyrolysis is defined as the of materials into simpler compounds through the application of in an inert atmosphere, without the presence of oxygen, often occurring at temperatures above 400°C. This process, also termed thermolysis, involves the breaking of covalent bonds in , leading to the formation of volatile products and a solid residue. For , pyrolysis is typically conducted at or above 500°C to ensure significant decomposition. The primary outputs of pyrolysis are categorized as char, tar (or pyrolysis oil), and non-condensable gases. Char denotes the carbonaceous solid residue left after volatilization, consisting mainly of fixed carbon with minimal volatiles, akin to charcoal in composition. Tar refers to the condensable liquid fraction, comprising complex hydrocarbons, phenolic compounds, and oxygenated species derived from the breakdown of polymers or biomass. Non-condensable gases, collectively known as syngas or synthesis gas, include hydrogen (H₂), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and light hydrocarbons that remain in the vapor phase post-reaction. Related terms include , which specifies slow pyrolysis optimized for maximizing char yield through prolonged heating at moderate temperatures (around 400–600°C), and , an older designation for the pyrolytic separation of volatile components from solids like or . These distinctions arise from variations in heating rates, residence times, and final temperatures, influencing product distribution without altering the core inert-environment requirement.

Types of Pyrolysis

Pyrolysis processes are primarily classified by heating rate, reaction temperature, , and pressure conditions, which determine the relative yields of solid char, liquid bio-oil, and non-condensable gases from organic feedstocks. Slow pyrolysis prioritizes char production through prolonged , while fast and flash variants emphasize liquids or gases via rapid heating to minimize secondary cracking. These distinctions arise from kinetic control over pathways, where slower rates allow char stabilization and faster rates favor volatile release before repolymerization. Slow pyrolysis, also termed conventional or pyrolysis, employs low heating rates of 0.1–1 °C/s at temperatures of 350–550 °C with vapor residence times exceeding 5 minutes, yielding up to 35% char, 30% oil, and 35% gas from . This method, historically used for production, maximizes solid residue by promoting and carbon enrichment in the solid phase while limiting formation through extended exposure. Fixed-bed reactors are common, operating under inert atmospheres to sustain yields consistent across lignocellulosic materials at scales from to industrial. Fast pyrolysis accelerates decomposition with heating rates of 10–200 °C/s at 450–550 °C and short residence times of 0.5–5 seconds, optimizing liquid bio-oil yields of 50–75% by vapors to prevent char formation or gas . Fluidized-bed or circulating-bed reactors facilitate rapid heat transfer, as demonstrated in trials yielding oils with 15–20% oxygen content suitable for upgrading to fuels. The process's efficiency stems from minimizing intraparticle heat gradients, though bio-oil instability requires downstream hydrotreating. Flash pyrolysis, or ultrapyrolysis, uses extreme heating rates above 1000 °C/s at 600–1000 °C with residence times under 0.5 seconds, prioritizing gas production (up to 75%) over liquids due to intensified cracking of primary vapors. Ablative or entrained-flow reactors enable this for finely ground feedstocks, as evidenced in studies on agricultural residues where yields exceed 60 vol%. Its high severity suits hydrogen-rich gas generation but demands precise control to avoid equipment from rapid coke deposition. Specialized variants adapt standard pyrolysis under modified conditions. Vacuum pyrolysis reduces pressure to 10–100 Pa, lowering decomposition temperatures by 50–100 °C and enabling selective volatilization of high-boiling compounds without atmospheric interference, as applied in for 40–50% oil recovery. Hydropyrolysis incorporates pressure (1–10 MPa) and often catalysts at 400–500 °C to stabilize radicals and boost liquids, yielding naphtha-range products from at efficiencies 20–30% higher than non-hydrogen processes. These modifications enhance product quality but increase operational complexity and energy input compared to conventional types.

Chemical Processes and Mechanisms

General Processes

Pyrolysis entails the thermochemical decomposition of organic materials at elevated temperatures, typically 300–800 °C, in an oxygen-limited or inert environment, yielding solid char, condensable liquids such as bio-oil or tar, and non-condensable gases like syngas. This endothermic process breaks down complex macromolecules through bond scission without combustion, distinguishing it from oxidation pathways. The core chemical processes divide into primary and secondary reactions. Primary reactions involve initial thermal degradation within the solid or nascent vapor phase, encompassing of polymers into monomers, fragmentation into smaller radicals, , , and char formation via cross-linking. These yield unstable primary volatiles, including aldehydes, ketones, acids, and hydrocarbons. Secondary reactions follow, featuring further cracking of volatiles to lighter gases, repolymerization to heavier tars, or interactions with char surfaces, modulated by factors like vapor and temperature. Higher temperatures and longer residence times favor secondary cracking, increasing gas yields over liquids. Reaction kinetics often follow free radical chain mechanisms, initiated by homolytic cleavage of C-C and C-O bonds, propagated by and beta-scission, and terminated by recombination or . Product distribution depends on feedstock composition, with components decomposing sequentially—hemicellulose at lower temperatures (~200–300 °C), around 300–400 °C, and across a wider range (~150–500 °C)—though analogous bond-breaking applies to other organics like plastics.

Reaction Mechanisms and Kinetics

Pyrolysis reactions predominantly follow free radical chain mechanisms, initiated by the thermal homolysis of covalent bonds in organic molecules at temperatures typically above 400°C, generating primary radicals that propagate through hydrogen abstraction, β-scission, and molecular rearrangement to yield volatile products, char, and secondary radicals, with termination via disproportionation or recombination. In hydrocarbon pyrolysis, such as in fossil fuels or plastics, the process emphasizes C-C and C-H bond cleavage, where initiation rates increase exponentially with temperature, leading to chain branching that amplifies decomposition efficiency. For biomass, mechanisms incorporate concurrent depolymerization of cellulose (via glycosidic bond rupture forming levoglucosan intermediates), hemicellulose fragmentation, and lignin cracking, all underpinned by radical-mediated dehydration and decarboxylation, though some concerted unimolecular pathways occur at lower severities. Kinetic analysis of pyrolysis employs the Arrhenius equation, k=Aexp⁡(−Ea/RT)k = A \exp(-E_a / RT), where activation energies (EaE_a) vary by feedstock and reaction stage, often spanning 150–250 kJ/mol for lignocellulosic biomass as determined by isoconversional methods like Friedman (differential) or Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (integral), which reveal EaE_a dependence on conversion (α) due to evolving reactive sites. Distributed activation energy models (DAEM) effectively simulate the polydispersity of bond energies, assuming parallel reactions with Gaussian-distributed EaE_a, yielding pre-exponential factors (A) on the order of 10^{10}–10^{15} s^{-1} for primary devolatilization. In hydrocarbon systems, global kinetic models simplify to nth-order reactions with lower EaE_a (e.g., 200–220 kJ/mol for alkane cracking), while detailed mechanisms incorporate hundreds of elementary steps for species-specific predictions. Process control in pyrolysis relies on these kinetics, with heating rates influencing radical dominance—slow pyrolysis favors char formation via cross-linking, whereas fast pyrolysis (rates >1000°C/s) minimizes secondary cracking for higher yields. Thermodynamic parameters, such as positive ΔH (endothermic) and decreasing ΔG with temperature, confirm feasibility, but kinetic barriers necessitate precise temperature profiles to optimize product distribution. Experimental validation via (TGA) coupled with evolved gas analysis underscores model accuracy, though challenges persist in scaling microscale kinetics to reactors due to / limitations.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Industrial Uses

Charcoal production through , involving the of in low-oxygen environments, represents one of the earliest documented applications of the process. Archaeological findings suggest deliberate dates to the period, around 10,000–5,000 BCE, where was carbonized in pits or mounds to produce a high-energy superior to raw . This method yielded with higher calorific value due to the removal of volatiles, enabling more efficient for heating and early . In prehistoric contexts, charcoal served as a pigment for cave art, with evidence from sites like the Niaux Cave in dating to approximately 17,000–13,000 BCE, where charred wood residues indicate controlled pyrolysis for black pigments. By the (circa 3000–1200 BCE), pyrolysis scaled for ; vast quantities of fueled furnaces in regions like the Mediterranean and , as wood shortages prompted systematic forest management for . Ancient civilizations refined pyrolysis techniques for diverse uses. In Iron Age Europe (circa 1200–500 BCE), rectangular pit s facilitated charcoal production for iron , evidenced by kiln remnants in the . Roman-era operations similarly employed covered stacks to minimize oxygen, producing for forges, lime s, and even military applications like Greek fire precursors. In , Chinese records from the (1046–256 BCE) describe pyrolysis of hardwood for and , while Scandinavian birch tar—derived from wood pyrolysis—was used for and adhesives by 500 BCE. Pre-industrial pyrolysis extended to biochar-like soil amendments, with Amazonian soils containing pyrogenic carbon from 500 BCE to 1500 CE, enhancing fertility through stable carbon residues. These practices persisted into the early using mound kilns, underscoring pyrolysis's role in sustaining agrarian and extractive economies before mechanized alternatives.

Early Industrial Applications (19th-early 20th Century)

In the , pyrolysis found its principal industrial application in the production of coke from , essential for fueling blast furnaces in the burgeoning iron and sectors. This involved heating to 900–1100°C in low-oxygen ovens, decomposing it into a porous carbon residue while driving off volatile matter as gases and tars. ovens, developed in the mid-19th century, enabled on a large scale; for instance, in the region, their numbers expanded from about 200 in 1870 to nearly 31,000 by 1905, yielding up to 18 million tons of coke annually to meet demands for and . Parallel to , of coal produced (primarily , , and ) through pyrolysis at 1100–1300°C, initially as a but evolving into a standalone process for urban illumination and heating. By the early , this supported widespread street lighting in industrial cities, with one ton of coal yielding approximately 400 m³ of gas alongside and ammonia liquor. , the condensed liquid fraction, served as a feedstock for emerging chemical industries, yielding , , and pitch for dyes, explosives, and preservatives. Wood pyrolysis persisted for charcoal production, particularly in U.S. iron smelting until the 1830s, when a typical 1000-ton annual pig iron furnace required about 180,000 bushels of charcoal, sourced from 150 acres of woodland via low-yield pit or kiln carbonization at around 300°C. Late-19th-century brick beehive kilns improved efficiency, processing 50–90 cords per batch and peaking at over 550,000 tons nationwide by 1909, with byproducts like acetic acid (up to 50 gallons per cord) and methanol extracted for solvents and fuels. However, forest depletion and coke's cost advantages prompted a shift, reducing charcoal's metallurgical role by the early 20th century.

Mid-20th Century Advancements

In the mid-20th century, pyrolysis advanced significantly through the commercialization of processes in the , enabling efficient production of and other light olefins from feedstocks such as , , and . The first commercial plants began operating in the early , marking a shift from earlier thermal cracking methods by incorporating steam dilution to suppress coke formation and enhance selectivity toward desired alkenes. This innovation supported the post-World War II expansion of synthetic materials, with output scaling rapidly to meet demands for plastics and chemicals. Pyrolysis furnace designs during this period typically featured horizontal radiant tubes, where feed mixtures were heated to temperatures around 800–900°C under short residence times exceeding 0.5 seconds to achieve thermal decomposition without oxygen. These configurations improved heat transfer and process control compared to pre-war setups, though they were limited by coking tendencies that required frequent decoking cycles. Alloy advancements in tube materials, such as high-chromium steels, enhanced resistance to carburization and thermal fatigue, allowing for higher throughput and reliability in continuous operations. While traditional pyrolysis applications like coke oven operations persisted for metallurgical uses, the petrochemical focus drove innovations in process integration, including better separation of pyrolysis gases into streams via compression, cooling, and . By the 1950s, these developments had established pyrolysis as the dominant method for olefin production, with global capacity growing from modest wartime levels to over 1 million tons of annually by 1960, underpinning the modern chemical industry's growth. Concurrently, exploratory efforts in pyrolysis, such as for rubber tires, emerged but remained limited to pilot scales amid the dominance of petroleum-derived feedstocks.

Late 20th and 21st Century Developments

In the late 1980s and , fast pyrolysis emerged as a key advancement, enabling rapid heating of to produce bio-oils as liquid fuels or chemical feedstocks, with research intensifying amid energy crises and interest. Finnish Technical Research Centre (VTT) initiated fast pyrolysis experiments in 1981, developing circulating fluidized-bed reactors and testing diverse feedstocks like forestry residues, achieving bio-oil yields up to 70% by weight under optimized conditions of 500°C and short vapor residence times. Commercial pilots followed, such as Ensyn's units deployed in by the mid-1990s, converting wood waste into heating oils, though scale-up faced challenges from bio-oil instability requiring upgrading. Pyrolysis applications expanded to in the , targeting tires and plastics amid growing environmental concerns over landfills. Thermal pyrolysis of scrap tires, pioneered in pilot facilities like those in the U.S. and , yielded 40-50% oil, 30-40% char, and by 1995, with processes operating at 400-600°C to recover hydrocarbons for blending. These efforts laid groundwork for integrated systems, though economic viability hinged on oil prices and emission controls. Into the , catalytic and plasma-assisted pyrolysis synthesis and , addressing limitations in yield and selectivity. pyrolysis gained traction post-2010 as a CO2-free route, decomposing CH4 into H2 and solid carbon at 1000-1500°C without or oxygen, with Materials commissioning the world's first commercial-scale in in 2020, producing 14,000 tons of H2 annually via plasma technology. Concurrently, and catalytic variants improved conversion, achieving 80-90% liquid yields from polyolefins at lower temperatures (around 500°C) by 2020, supporting goals despite scaling hurdles from catalyst deactivation. -focused slow pyrolysis also proliferated for soil amendment, with commercial units processing agricultural residues into stable carbon sinks, sequestering up to 2.5 tons of CO2 per ton of biochar produced. ![Methane Pyrolysis-1.png][center]

Applications

Traditional and Everyday Uses

Pyrolysis serves as the foundational process in traditional charcoal production, involving the slow heating of wood in oxygen-limited conditions to yield a carbon-rich solid used for fuel and metallurgy. This method, the oldest form of carbonization, has been practiced for over 6,000 years, with evidence of its application in prehistoric societies for domestic heating and early metalworking. In regions reliant on biomass energy, such as parts of Africa and Asia, earth-mound kilns employing slow pyrolysis continue to produce charcoal for cooking and small-scale industries, often accounting for significant deforestation pressures due to inefficient yields of 10-25% char from wood mass. Coke production from pyrolysis represents another historical application, developed in the to provide a cleaner-burning for smelting in blast furnaces, supplanting wood charcoal amid resource scarcity in industrializing . This process, conducted at temperatures around 1,000°C, removes volatile to produce a porous carbon structure essential for reducing . In everyday contexts, pyrolysis manifests during cooking techniques involving high-heat exposure, such as or vegetables and meats, where of organic components generates flavorful compounds and crust formation prior to oxidation. For instance, the blackened surfaces on overcooked foods result from pyrolysis breaking down complex molecules into simpler volatiles and char. Such processes, though incidental, parallel controlled pyrolysis in producing biochars used in traditional of foods for preservation and taste enhancement.

Charcoal, Coke, and Carbon Production

Charcoal production relies on the pyrolysis of , such as wood, where the material is heated to 400–600°C in a low-oxygen environment to thermally decompose organic components, volatilizing , , and while enriching the solid residue in carbon. This exothermic process yields with properties influenced by parameters like heating rate, peak temperature, and ; for instance, higher temperatures up to 600°C increase fixed carbon content but reduce yield. Traditional methods use kilns or metal retorts, with modern variants optimizing for sustainability by recovering byproducts like . Yields typically range from 20–35% by weight, depending on feedstock moisture (ideally below 30%) and pyrolysis duration of 4–7 hours. Coke is generated via high-temperature pyrolysis of , heated to 900–1200°C under oxygen-free conditions in coke ovens, which expels volatile matter (20–40% of coal mass) through thermal , leaving a strong, porous carbon skeleton suitable for metallurgical applications. The process involves initial softening into metaplast at 400–500°C, followed by resolidification and graphitization, with mechanisms including transfer and radical recombination to form anisotropic structures. Industrial coking lasts 12–24 hours per batch, producing coke with over 85% carbon and low /ash for use; co-pyrolysis with additives like can enhance quality by altering volatile release. Other carbon materials, such as , emerge from pyrolysis of hydrocarbons or waste feedstocks like tires or at 1200–1400°C, where or vapor-phase forms nanoscale particulates via and aggregation of carbon radicals. This yields high-surface-area black (20–300 m²/g) used in tires and inks, with recovered from tire pyrolysis achieving purity comparable to virgin material after post-processing. precursors are similarly produced by pyrolysis at 500–800°C, followed by physical (e.g., /CO₂) or chemical to develop porosities exceeding 1000 m²/g for adsorption applications. These pyrolysis-derived carbons prioritize structural integrity over volatile recovery, with yields of 25–50% modulated by temperature and atmosphere.

Cooking and Food-Related Processes

Pyrolysis manifests in cooking through the of 's organic constituents at elevated temperatures, often under limited oxygen availability, contributing to desirable flavors, aromas, and textures while risking the formation of potentially harmful compounds when uncontrolled. In dry-heat methods such as , , toasting, , and , the exterior layers of dry out and decompose, yielding charred surfaces and volatile pyrolysis products that impart nutty, roasted notes. Caramelization exemplifies pyrolysis in food preparation, where carbohydrates, particularly sugars, break down above approximately 160°C to form brown pigments and complex flavor molecules like furans and maltol, enhancing sweetness and depth in items such as caramel sauces, roasted vegetables, and browned onions. This process requires dry conditions and high heat, distinguishing it from hydration-dependent reactions, and occurs independently of proteins unlike the Maillard reaction. Excessive pyrolysis during caramelization can lead to bitterness from over-decomposed compounds. In grilling and barbecuing meats, pyrolysis of surface proteins, fats, and drippings generates savory, smoky profiles through the release of aldehydes and hydrocarbons, but fat pyrolysis onto hot coals or flames produces polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), classified as carcinogenic by bodies like the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Mitigation includes trimming excess fat to reduce drippings and avoiding direct flame contact. Toasting grains or breads involves pyrolysis that volatilizes starches and proteins, creating crisp textures and toasty flavors, though burning elevates levels, a probable human formed via asparagine-sugar reactions under heat. , obtained by condensing vapors from wood pyrolysis at 400–600°C in oxygen-limited environments, serves as a commercial flavor additive mimicking traditional , applied in sausages, cheeses, and sauces for imparting smokiness without direct emissions. This method, refined since the early , offers consistency and reduced PAH content compared to open .

Energy and Fuel Production

Pyrolysis converts , waste, and hydrocarbons into energy-dense products like bio-oil, , and through at 400–800°C under inert conditions. Fast pyrolysis of prioritizes liquid bio-oil yields of 40–50 wt%, alongside 20–30 wt% and 15–25 wt% char, with optimal temperatures around 500°C for maximizing condensable vapors. These liquids exhibit higher heating values of 15–20 MJ/kg, enabling use in boilers for heat and power generation, though their high oxygen content (35–40 wt%) and acidity necessitate stabilization or hydrodeoxygenation for broader fuel applications. fractions, comprising H₂, CO, CO₂, and CH₄, achieve contents up to 50 vol% in optimized processes and support in engines or as feed for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, with efficiencies exceeding 70% in integrated systems. Liquid biofuels from pyrolysis of agricultural residues or wood chips yield up to 35–47 wt% bio-oil under fluidized-bed conditions with particle sizes below 0.1 mm, providing a pathway to drop-in fuels after catalytic upgrading. Gaseous outputs, including hydrogen-rich , enable direct energy production via gas turbines or fuel cells, with co-pyrolysis of blends enhancing syngas calorific values to 10–15 MJ/Nm³. Waste-derived pyrolysis, such as from plastics, generates fuel oils with yields of 50–80 wt% at 400–600°C, comparable to diesel in (40–45 MJ/kg), though risks require purification. Methane pyrolysis emerges as a low-emission route to , cleaving CH₄ into H₂ and solid carbon at 1000–1500°C without CO₂ , contrasting methane reforming's 8–10 kg CO₂/kg H₂ emissions. Process efficiencies reach 58% on an energy basis, lower than reforming's 75% but advantageous for via solid sales, with energy inputs of 7–12 kWh/kg H₂ versus ' 50+ kWh/kg. Pilot-scale demonstrations, including catalyst-free variants producing 530 g H₂/h/L , highlight , while the Olive Creek 1 facility, operational since 2021, marks the first commercial pyrolysis plant at 1–5 tons/day H₂ capacity. Challenges include high temperatures demanding and carbon deposition management, yet economic viability improves with carbon credits, targeting costs below $2/kg H₂.

Liquid and Gaseous Biofuels

Pyrolysis of feedstock, such as wood chips, agricultural residues, or crops, converts into liquid bio-oil, , and char under oxygen-limited conditions at temperatures typically ranging from 400–600°C. Fast pyrolysis, characterized by rapid heating rates exceeding 1000°C/s and short vapor residence times under 2 seconds, maximizes liquid yields to produce bio-oil as a primary , while slower variants favor gaseous products. This thermochemical process offers a pathway for from , with product distribution influenced by temperature, heating rate, and feedstock . Liquid bio-oil, a dark, viscous mixture of oxygenated compounds including , acids, and aldehydes, constitutes 30–75% of fast pyrolysis output depending on conditions and type. Optimal yields reach up to 65–75 wt% on a dry-ash-free basis for woody at 500°C in fluidized-bed reactors, though actual commercial outputs average 50–60% due to (15–30%) and instability requiring stabilization. Bio-oil's high oxygen content (35–40%) results in lower heating values (16–19 MJ/kg) compared to fuels, limiting direct use, but upgrading via hydrodeoxygenation yields drop-in transportation fuels like and diesel. Demonstration plants, such as those processing 100 tons/day of , have produced stabilized bio-oil for fuel since the early 2010s. Gaseous biofuels from pyrolysis primarily consist of syngas (CO, H₂, CH₄, CO₂, and light hydrocarbons), yielding 15–35% by weight in fast processes and higher (up to 42%) in slow pyrolysis with fine particles (<0.5 mm). Syngas composition varies, with H₂ fractions of 40–60% achievable via integrated steam gasification post-pyrolysis, enhancing its calorific value (10–20 MJ/m³) for combustion or reforming. Applications include on-site power generation in gas engines or turbines, where syngas from biomass pyrolysis-gasification hybrids powers integrated systems with efficiencies up to 25%, and as a precursor for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons. Challenges include tar formation reducing gas quality, mitigated by catalytic cracking at 800–900°C.
Pyrolysis TypeTemperature (°C)Bio-oil Yield (wt%)Gas Yield (wt%)Primary Use
Fast450–55050–7515–25Liquid fuel upgrading
Slow400–60015–3025–40Syngas for heat/power
Economic viability hinges on feedstock costs below $50/ton and scale-up, with life-cycle analyses showing greenhouse gas reductions of 70–90% versus fossil fuels when co-product char sequesters carbon. Ongoing research focuses on catalytic pyrolysis to improve bio-oil stability and syngas H₂ content for cleaner biofuels.

Methane Pyrolysis for Hydrogen

Methane pyrolysis involves the thermal decomposition of methane into hydrogen gas and solid carbon via the endothermic reaction CH₄ → C + 2H₂, with a standard enthalpy change of +74.9 kJ/mol. This process operates at temperatures exceeding 1000°C under atmospheric pressure, yielding theoretically up to 96.4% methane conversion at 900°C in optimized conditions, though practical efficiencies are lower without catalysts. Unlike steam methane reforming, it avoids direct CO₂ emissions, producing solid carbon as the only byproduct, which can be valorized as carbon black or graphene precursors. The primary advantage lies in generating low-emission "turquoise" hydrogen, requiring 7-12 kWh per kg of H₂—less than electrolysis—while leveraging existing natural gas infrastructure for modular deployment. Challenges include high energy demands, catalyst deactivation from carbon deposition, and separation of hydrogen from solid carbon, necessitating innovations like plasma-assisted, catalytic, or molten metal systems to reduce temperatures to 700-900°C and improve yields above 80% conversion. Electrified methods, such as resistive heating or microwave plasma, enhance efficiency by enabling renewable electricity integration, though economic viability hinges on carbon byproduct markets and scaling beyond pilots. Commercial progress accelerated post-2020, with Monolith Materials commissioning the Olive Creek 1 facility in Nebraska in 2020 as the world's first commercial-scale methane pyrolysis plant, producing 14,000 tons of H₂ annually alongside carbon black. Other ventures include Modern Hydrogen's modular reactors integrated into gas networks, Ekona Power's xCaliber plasma tech with a 200 kg/day pilot in Alberta since 2023, and C-Zero's non-electrified pilot yielding graphitic carbon. Graphitic Energy commissioned a pilot in 2025 for zero-emission H₂ and graphite, partnering with Technip Energies for scale-up. Tulum Energy secured $27 million in 2025 funding for a catalyst-free pilot targeting low-cost H₂. As of 2025, the sector remains pre-commercial at large scales, with demonstrations proving feasibility but full commercialization dependent on policy support and carbon pricing to offset upstream methane emissions.

Chemical and Materials Synthesis

Pyrolysis enables the synthesis of commodity chemicals and advanced materials through controlled thermal decomposition of organic feedstocks in oxygen-free environments, typically at temperatures exceeding 500°C, producing volatile products like olefins, aromatics, and carbon nanostructures via bond cleavage and recombination. This process underpins industrial-scale production of monomers for polymers and precursors for high-value materials, with yields optimized by factors such as temperature, residence time, and catalysts. In chemical synthesis, pyrolysis cracking converts hydrocarbons into lighter fractions, while in materials engineering, it fabricates carbon-based structures with tailored properties for composites and electronics.

Ethylene Production

Industrial ethylene synthesis predominantly relies on pyrolysis via steam cracking of feedstocks like , , or liquefied petroleum gases at 750–950°C and low pressures (1–2 bar), with steam dilution to suppress coke formation and enhance selectivity. cracking yields up to 80% ethylene by weight, while processes produce 25–35% ethylene alongside byproducts like and aromatics; global capacity exceeds 200 million tons annually as of 2023. Innovations include catalytic pyrolysis of heavy hydrocarbons using pillared clays to boost ethylene and yields from residues, achieving over 50% light olefin selectivity at milder conditions (600–700°C). Higher temperatures in non-steam pyrolysis of plastics or hydrocarbons favor ethylene formation, with yields reaching 20–30% from at 800°C, supporting circular economy recycling.

Fine Chemical Synthesis

Pyrolysis of biomass or waste streams generates platform chemicals and aromatics through catalytic or non-catalytic decomposition, with additives like zeolites enhancing selectivity for compounds such as , , and xylenes (BTX). For instance, ex situ catalytic pyrolysis of black liquors at 500–600°C with ZSM-5 catalysts produces BTX yields of 10–15 wt%, serving as precursors for pharmaceuticals and polymers. Cellulose fast pyrolysis at 500°C yields oxygenates like levoglucosan and furans (up to 20% combined), which can be upgraded to fine chemicals via subsequent hydrodeoxygenation. Low-temperature catalytic pyrolysis (400–500°C) of plastics or biomass with metal oxides selectively forms high-value products like or , with landfill-recovered plastics enabling 5–10% yields of aromatics under optimized conditions. These processes leverage pyrolysis's ability to break C-O and C-C bonds, though product separation remains challenging due to complex mixtures.

Semiconductor Manufacturing

Spray pyrolysis deposits thin semiconductor films by nebulizing organometallic or inorganic precursors into aerosols, which decompose thermally on heated substrates (300–600°C) to form materials like ZnO, CdS, or Si-based anodes with controlled stoichiometry and morphology. Ultrasonic variants produce denser films (up to 1 μm thick) for photovoltaic or sensor applications, achieving deposition rates of 10–100 nm/min. In lithium-ion battery anodes, pyrolysis of silicon-polymer composites at 700–900°C yields high-capacity Si/C structures with initial Coulombic efficiencies over 80%, mitigating volume expansion issues. Laser pyrolysis enables precise nanopatterning or cluster synthesis for electronics, fabricating semiconductor nanoparticles from molecular precursors at ambient pressures. These methods offer scalability over vacuum-based techniques like CVD, though precursor volatility and uniformity control are critical for defect-free films.

Ethylene Production

Steam cracking, a form of pyrolysis, serves as the dominant industrial method for ethylene production, accounting for over 99% of global output as of 2023. In this process, saturated hydrocarbons such as ethane, propane, or naphtha are thermally decomposed in the absence of oxygen at temperatures ranging from 750°C to 950°C, with steam dilution to minimize coke formation and enhance selectivity toward lighter olefins. The reaction proceeds via free radical mechanisms, where C-C bonds break homolytically, generating ethylene (C₂H₄) as the primary product alongside byproducts like propylene, hydrogen, and aromatics. Feedstocks vary by region and economics: ethane from natural gas yields up to 80% ethylene at coil outlet temperatures (COT) of 850–900°C, while heavier naphtha feeds produce 25–35% ethylene but higher coproduct values at similar severities. Process conditions include short residence times of 0.1–0.5 seconds in tubular coils within gas-fired furnaces to limit secondary reactions that reduce ethylene yield, such as aromatization or polymerization. Steam-to-hydrocarbon ratios of 0.3–1.0 by weight further suppress coking by lowering partial pressures and promoting radical termination. Post-cracking, the effluent is rapidly quenched to below 300°C to preserve yields, followed by compression, cooling, and cryogenic distillation for ethylene recovery exceeding 99% purity. The process is highly endothermic, requiring approximately 4 million kcal per ton of , with furnace designs optimized for heat transfer efficiency using advanced coil materials like high-nickel alloys to withstand thermal and carburizing stresses. Yield optimization balances severity—higher COT boosts but increases coke and fuel use—often modeled via response surface methodology for specific plants, as demonstrated in large-scale naphtha crackers achieving 30–32% from short residence time operations. Emerging variants explore oxidative coupling or catalytic enhancements, but conventional steam remains unmatched for scale, producing over 180 million metric tons annually as of 2022, underpinning polyethylene and derivative chemicals.

Fine Chemical Synthesis

Pyrolysis enables the synthesis of fine chemicals through the controlled thermal decomposition of biomass or organic precursors, yielding high-value intermediates such as anhydrosugars, phenolics, and oxygenates that serve as building blocks for pharmaceuticals, flavors, and agrochemicals. Selective fast pyrolysis of cellulose at temperatures around 500°C produces levoglucosan in yields up to 40-50% on a carbon basis, a versatile precursor for carbohydrate-derived fine chemicals via hydrolysis or oxidation. Similarly, pyrolysis of hemicellulose generates furfural and acetic acid, with furfural yields reaching 10-20% under optimized conditions, enabling downstream synthesis of furan-based resins and solvents. Lignin pyrolysis, typically conducted at 400-600°C, yields phenolic compounds like guaiacols and syringols, which constitute 20-30% of the bio-oil fraction and can be upgraded to antioxidants or polymer precursors. Catalytic variants, employing zeolites or metal oxides, enhance selectivity; for instance, zeolite-catalyzed pyrolysis of at 500°C boosts hydroxyacetaldehyde production to over 15%, a key intermediate for acrylic acid synthesis. These processes leverage pyrolysis's ability to cleave C-O and C-C bonds without oxygen, preserving molecular complexity compared to oxidative methods, though challenges include bio-oil instability requiring immediate stabilization. Pyrolytic lignin, isolated from fast pyrolysis bio-oils, serves as a feedstock for hydrodeoxygenation to produce alkylphenols or catechols, with pilot-scale demonstrations achieving 90% carbon recovery into targeted aromatics. Fluidized-bed reactors facilitate scale-up, as demonstrated in studies recovering specialty chemicals enriched in guaiacyl units from softwood lignin at 10-20 g/kg feedstock. Overall, pyrolysis offers a renewable route to fine chemicals, bypassing petroleum dependence, with economic viability hinging on integrated upgrading to mitigate tar formation and achieve purities exceeding 95%.

Semiconductor Manufacturing

Pyrolysis contributes to semiconductor manufacturing through thermal decomposition processes in thin-film deposition techniques, particularly spray pyrolysis and certain variants of chemical vapor deposition (CVD). In spray pyrolysis, a precursor solution is atomized and sprayed onto a heated substrate, where droplets undergo pyrolysis to form polycrystalline or amorphous films of materials such as zinc oxide (ZnO), tin oxide, or other metal oxides used in transparent conductors, sensors, and photovoltaic devices. This method enables uniform deposition over large areas at atmospheric pressure, with substrate temperatures typically ranging from 300–500°C, offering cost-effective scalability compared to vacuum-based techniques. For example, ZnO thin films deposited via spray pyrolysis achieve thicknesses of around 20 nm with high-performance semiconducting properties for optoelectronic applications. In CVD, pyrolysis serves as a primary reaction mechanism for decomposing volatile precursors into solid deposits. Thermal CVD relies on pyrolysis of compounds like silane (SiH4) at temperatures above 600°C to produce silicon layers for integrated circuits, while metal-organic CVD (MOCVD) involves pyrolysis of organometallics such as trimethylgallium for epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductors like gallium arsenide (GaAs) used in high-frequency transistors and LEDs. These processes occur in inert or controlled atmospheres to prevent oxidation, yielding precise control over film composition and doping. Additionally, flame pyrolysis or combustion CVD variants deposit carbon-based materials, including graphene, by pyrolyzing hydrocarbons in an oxygen-lean flame, applicable for interconnects or heat spreaders in advanced chips. Pyrolysis also facilitates the synthesis of semiconductor nanoparticles and clusters from molecular precursors, enabling tailored optoelectronic properties, though scaling to industrial wafer fabrication remains challenging. Overall, these applications leverage pyrolysis's ability to break covalent bonds selectively, supporting the fabrication of functional layers critical to transistor gates, passivation, and active regions in modern semiconductors.

Waste Management and Recycling

Pyrolysis serves as a thermochemical process for converting waste materials into recoverable products such as syngas, bio-oil, and char, offering volume reduction and energy recovery alternatives to landfilling or incineration. In waste management, it processes organic fractions of municipal solid waste (MSW), agricultural residues, and sewage sludge under oxygen-limited conditions at temperatures typically between 400°C and 700°C, yielding biochar for soil amendment, liquids for fuels, and gases for energy generation. This approach achieves up to 95% volume reduction of solid organic waste compared to landfilling, while avoiding direct emissions of dioxins and nitrogen oxides associated with incineration due to the anaerobic environment.

Biomass and Organic Waste Pyrolysis

Biomass pyrolysis targets lignocellulosic wastes like forestry residues, crop stalks, and food scraps, decomposing them into biochar (15-25% yield), bio-oil (60-70%), and syngas (10-15%) via fast pyrolysis at 400-500°C. Slow pyrolysis prioritizes biochar production for carbon sequestration and soil enhancement, with applications demonstrated in converting sewage sludge or manure into nutrient-rich char that improves soil fertility and reduces greenhouse gas emissions from decomposition. Empirical studies show energy yields equivalent to offsetting fossil fuel use, but limitations include high preprocessing needs for uniform feedstock and potential tar formation clogging systems, necessitating catalytic upgrades for scalability. Commercial plants, such as those processing 100 tons/day of agricultural waste, report net energy positives but face economic hurdles from capital costs exceeding $200/ton capacity.

Plastic and Mixed Waste Pyrolysis

Plastic pyrolysis depolymerizes non-biodegradable polymers like and in mixed waste streams, producing liquid hydrocarbons (60-80% yield in optimized fast processes at 500-600°C) suitable for refining into diesel or naphtha, alongside char and gas byproducts. Recent lab-scale advancements achieve 66% fuel conversion without catalysts using specialized reactors, while catalytic variants using spent FCC catalysts boost liquid yields over 80% by enhancing cracking efficiency. However, commercial yields often range 15-30% due to contaminants in real mixed waste, feedstock heterogeneity, and energy-intensive sorting, leading to debates on viability versus mechanical recycling. For MSW plastics, pyrolysis integrates with for syngas cleanup, reducing landfill diversion rates, but persistent challenges include char recyclability issues and variable oil quality requiring further upgrading, with lifecycle GHG reductions projected at 39-65% by 2030 under improved regulations.

Biomass and Organic Waste Pyrolysis

Pyrolysis of biomass and organic waste entails the thermal decomposition of materials such as agricultural residues, forestry byproducts, sewage sludge, and municipal solid organic fractions in an inert atmosphere, typically at temperatures ranging from 300°C to 700°C. This oxygen-deficient process breaks down complex polymers like cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin into biochar (a carbon-rich solid), bio-oil (a condensable liquid), and syngas (primarily hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane). Unlike combustion or gasification, pyrolysis minimizes oxidation, preserving energy content in products suitable for recycling and energy recovery. Process variants include slow pyrolysis (heating rates of 0.1-1°C/s, residence times of minutes to hours), which prioritizes biochar yields of 25-35% by weight at 400-500°C; fast pyrolysis (10-1000°C/s, short vapor residence times of <2 seconds), optimizing bio-oil production up to 75% at 500-550°C; and intermediate options like torrefaction at 200-300°C for pretreated fuels. Yields vary with feedstock composition and conditions: for mixed biomass, biochar decreases from ~61% at 300°C to 37% at 600°C, while gas and oil fractions rise inversely due to enhanced volatilization and cracking. Energy efficiency can reach 75.5% at ~589°C, converting 15.6 MJ/kg of input to usable products. In waste management, pyrolysis diverts organic waste from landfills, achieving volume reductions of 70-90% and enabling circular economy applications. serves as a soil amendment, enhancing fertility, water retention, and carbon sequestration (up to 2-5 tons CO2-equivalent per ton applied), while mitigating nutrient leaching. Bio-oil provides a renewable fuel or chemical precursor, and powers on-site operations or grids, with overall systems demonstrating net-positive energy balances in scaled facilities. Environmental advantages encompass reduced methane emissions (a potent greenhouse gas from anaerobic decomposition) and lower NOx/SOx outputs versus incineration, alongside resource recovery from heterogeneous wastes like food scraps and yard trimmings. Challenges include feedstock variability, which affects product consistency due to differing moisture (10-50%), ash (1-40%), and lignin contents; tar formation in bio-oils, complicating upgrading; and high capital costs for continuous reactors, hindering commercialization despite pilot successes. Pre-treatments like drying and grinding mitigate inconsistencies, but economic viability demands yields >60% liquids for biofuels and policy support for incentives. Ongoing advancements focus on catalytic pyrolysis to boost hydrogen-rich and hybrid systems integrating with for enhanced organic waste handling.

Plastic and Mixed Waste Pyrolysis

Pyrolysis of thermally decomposes long-chain polymers into shorter hydrocarbons under inert atmospheres at temperatures typically ranging from 400 to 600 °C, yielding oils suitable as fuels or chemical feedstocks, non-condensable gases, and char residue. The process operates in various types, including batch, fluidized-bed, and reactors, with residence times of minutes to hours influencing product distribution. yields predominate for polyolefins like (PE) and (PP), often exceeding 80% at 500 °C in lab-scale setups, while (PS) produces 60-70% aromatic-rich oils; (PET) yields lower (around 40-50%) with more gases and char, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) generates corrosive , complicating operations. For mixed plastic wastes, comprising multiple types from post-consumer sources, pyrolysis exhibits synergistic effects where interactions alter cracking patterns, potentially reducing overall yields to 50-70% and increasing gas production due to cross-reactions like transfer. Predictive models based on individual pyrolysis can estimate mixed yields with reasonable accuracy, but heterogeneity demands pre-treatment like shredding or separation to mitigate inconsistencies. Products include contaminated oils requiring upgrading for refinery compatibility, (primarily H₂, CH₄, CO), and char usable as or adsorbent, though impurities from additives like flame retardants lower value. When plastics constitute part of mixed (MSW), pyrolysis faces amplified challenges from organic fractions, moisture (up to 50% in unsorted waste), and inorganics, shifting emphasis toward production over liquids, with overall energy yields 20-30% lower than sorted plastics due to endothermic and ash formation. Volume reduction reaches 80-95%, but tar and char contamination from diverse feedstocks necessitates integrated or plasma treatment for viability. Key advantages include resource recovery avoiding landfilling and potential greenhouse gas savings over incineration, with life-cycle assessments showing up to 50% lower emissions for optimized processes. However, scalability remains limited: as of 2023, chemical recycling via pyrolysis processes only ~50,000 tons annually in Europe, constrained by feedstock inconsistency, high sorting costs (up to 30% of expenses), and uncompetitive economics without subsidies or carbon pricing. Recent advances incorporate catalysts like zeolites to boost selectivity for monomers (e.g., 20-40% styrene from PS blends) and pilot-scale twin-screw reactors for continuous mixed waste handling, yet full commercialization lags due to variable product quality and regulatory hurdles for "end-of-waste" status. Empirical data underscore that while lab yields are promising, real-world mixed feeds often underperform by 10-20% without rigorous pre-processing.

Other Specialized Uses

Thermal cleaning employs pyrolysis to decompose organic residues, such as paints, polymers, and coatings, from metal components in industrial applications. Operating at temperatures of 400–600°C in an inert or low-oxygen atmosphere, the process converts contaminants into volatile gases, ash, and minimal residues without damaging the substrate or requiring chemical solvents. or pyrolysis variants enhance efficiency by suspending parts in a heated medium or reducing pressure to accelerate , followed by scrubbing or oxidation of effluents to minimize emissions. This method is widely used in sectors like and automotive for refurbishing tools and fixtures, offering cost savings over mechanical or abrasive alternatives while complying with environmental regulations on . In , pyrolysis manifests during the heating of illicit substances for or , as seen in the consumption of drugs like , , , and . When powdered drugs are pyrolyzed—often unintentionally during or improvised synthesis— they yield specific products, including toxic aerosols and persistent residues that deposit on surfaces. Forensic analyses, such as pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, have characterized these patterns; for instance, d-methamphetamine heated in sealed tubes produces identifiable pyrolyzates like N-cyanomethylmethamphetamine. Such processes generate health risks from byproducts and complicate detection in illegal labs, where uncontrolled pyrolysis can lead to explosions or contamination. Peer-reviewed studies emphasize that adulterated mixtures, like heroin-fentanyl combinations, produce variable pyromarkers depending on temperature and ratios, informing and site remediation efforts.

Clandestine Chemistry

Clandestine production of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) has involved the of (CBD) sourced from legal extracts. This process leverages heating to rearrange CBD's molecular structure into the psychoactive THC , circumventing direct cultivation of prohibited strains. Thermal conversion occurs effectively at temperatures between 175 °C and 300 °C, where CBD undergoes cyclization, particularly under anaerobic or low-oxygen conditions to favor over oxidative breakdown. Studies confirm that heating pure CBD for 30 minutes produces detectable quantities of Δ9-THC without catalysts, though efficiency varies with duration and atmosphere; anaerobic setups yield higher selectivity by limiting side products like degradative volatiles. In illicit operations, this pyrolysis-based method exploits regulatory distinctions allowing hemp-derived CBD (with <0.3% THC) while prohibiting Δ9-THC, enabling small-scale, at-home synthesis often using basic apparatus like sealed vessels or ovens. Acid catalysts can enhance yields but are not essential for thermal routes, which prioritize simplicity to evade detection. Forensic profiling of reaction impurities, such as residual CBD or atypical THC stereoisomers, aids in tracing these clandestine sources.

Thermal Cleaning

Thermal cleaning employs to decompose organic residues from metal parts and tools in industrial settings, typically at temperatures between 380°C and 500°C in a low-oxygen or inert atmosphere, converting contaminants into gases, oils, and inert ash without damaging the substrate. This process avoids chemical solvents and mechanical abrasion, targeting persistent deposits such as paints, plastics, resins, oils, and polymers that accumulate on production equipment. The core mechanism involves thermal decomposition without direct flame contact, where organic materials break down into smaller molecules via indirect heating, often followed by a controlled oxidation phase to combust residual carbon residues into carbon dioxide and water. Systems include pyrolysis ovens for batch processing of large components like molds and dies, fluidized bed reactors for uniform heat distribution, and vacuum pyrolysis setups that minimize oxidation risks for precision parts. Cycle times vary from 3 to 8 hours depending on part size and contamination level, with post-process ash removal via wiping or vacuuming. Applications span manufacturing sectors, including plastics extrusion where it cleans contaminated screws and barrels, polymer processing for residue removal from jet cleaners, and heat exchanger maintenance to restore efficiency by eliminating fouling in hard-to-reach areas. In coating and tooling industries, it strips old powder coatings or resins from hooks and fixtures, extending equipment lifespan compared to abrasive methods that risk surface distortion. Advantages include environmental benefits from reduced chemical waste and emissions captured via gas scrubbing, alongside operational efficiency gains, as cleaned parts achieve near-original performance without introducing contaminants into subsequent processes. However, the process requires specialized furnaces with safety interlocks to manage pyrolysis gases like hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide, ensuring compliance with industrial emission standards.

Analytical Methods

Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) measures the mass variation of a sample as a function of temperature or time in a controlled atmosphere, serving as a primary tool for characterizing pyrolysis processes by revealing decomposition temperatures, weight loss stages, and reaction kinetics. In pyrolysis contexts, samples such as biomass or plastics are heated under inert gases like nitrogen at rates of 5–20 °C/min, producing thermogravimetric (TG) curves that plot mass versus temperature and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves that highlight peak decomposition rates. This non-isothermal approach simulates slow pyrolysis conditions, enabling identification of primary devolatilization events, such as hemicellulose breakdown in biomass around 200–320 °C, cellulose at 315–400 °C, and lignin above 400 °C. TGA quantifies pyrolysis yields indirectly through residual mass fractions, with biomass typically showing 60–80% volatile loss and 20–40% char retention at 800 °C, varying by feedstock composition like lignocellulosic content. For plastics, such as low-density polyethylene (LDPE), decomposition occurs in a single sharp stage between 400–500 °C, achieving near-complete mass loss (>95%) due to scission into hydrocarbons. Co-pyrolysis blends of and plastics exhibit synergistic effects, often shifting onset temperatures lower (e.g., by 20–50 °C) and enhancing overall decomposition efficiency, as evidenced by reduced activation energies in blends compared to individual components. Kinetic parameters, including activation energy (E_a), are derived from TGA data using isoconversional methods like Friedman or Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose, which avoid assumptions of reaction order and yield E_a values of 150–250 kJ/mol for biomass pyrolysis, increasing with conversion degree due to changing mechanisms. Model-fitting approaches, such as Coats-Redfern, fit n-th order or distributed activation energy models but are critiqued for potential overparameterization; isoconversional methods are preferred for reliability across heating rates. TGA's advantages include minimal sample size (5–20 mg), precise atmosphere control to mimic pyrolysis inertness, and rapid screening for process optimization, though it overlooks evolved gas composition, necessitating hyphenation with mass spectrometry (TG-MS) for molecular insights. Limitations encompass scale-up discrepancies from macro-pyrolysis and sensitivity to particle size, which can alter heat/mass transfer and apparent kinetics by 10–20%.

Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC-MS)

Pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) is an analytical technique that thermally decomposes complex, non-volatile samples such as polymers, biomolecules, and environmental matrices at high temperatures (typically 400–800°C) to generate volatile pyrolysis products, which are subsequently separated by and identified via . This method enables the characterization of macromolecular structures without prior extraction or derivatization, making it particularly valuable for insoluble or high-molecular-weight materials. In operation, a small sample (often 0.1–1 mg) is introduced into a pyrolysis interface, where rapid heating in an inert atmosphere (e.g., ) induces bond cleavage and fragmentation into smaller, analyzable volatiles. These gases are transferred online to a gas chromatograph, where they are separated based on volatility and polarity using a capillary column (e.g., non-polar phases like 5% phenyl polysiloxane), followed by detection in a mass spectrometer operating in mode at 70 eV for reproducible fragmentation patterns. Double-shot variants allow sequential evolved gas analysis and pyrolysis for additive detection alongside backbone profiling. has evolved to include programmable vaporization inlets and high-resolution MS for enhanced sensitivity down to levels. Py-GC-MS finds extensive application in for fingerprinting , copolymers, and degradation products, as seen in analyses of and in environmental deposits. In forensics, it differentiates polyesters and detects additives in fibers from waste or crime scenes, providing compositional data beyond optical . Environmentally, it quantifies micro- and nanoplastics in sediments, biota, and even human blood by identifying polymer-specific pyrolysates like styrene from , outperforming spectroscopic methods for low-concentration or subsurface particles. It also supports pyrolysis studies for optimization via catalytic co-pyrolysis product profiling. Advantages include high specificity for minor constituents (e.g., oligomers at <1% levels), minimal sample preparation, and compatibility with automated systems for high-throughput screening, enabling detection of non-volatile components inaccessible to standard GC-MS. However, limitations encompass its destructive nature, poor sensitivity to inorganics, variability in non-homogeneous samples, and challenges in absolute quantification for certain polymers like due to overlapping pyrolysates or incomplete volatilization. Recent standardization efforts address reproducibility issues, such as pyrolysis temperature control and library matching protocols.

Macroscale and Machine Learning Approaches

Macroscale approaches to pyrolysis analysis extend beyond microscale techniques like thermogravimetric analysis by employing computational simulations and larger-scale experiments to capture transport phenomena, particle interactions, and reactor-level dynamics. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) combined with discrete element method (DEM) models simulate pyrolysis in fluidized beds, accounting for particle motion, heat transfer, and chemical reactions at the particle scale, enabling prediction of product yields influenced by reactor hydrodynamics. Eulerian multifluid models further integrate detailed chemical kinetics to analyze biomass fast pyrolysis, revealing how kinetic mechanisms affect gas, tar, and char distributions under varying temperatures up to 800°C and residence times of seconds. Mesoscale tools, such as Mesoflow developed by NREL, bridge micro- and macroscales by modeling coupled transport and chemistry in catalytic pyrolysis, facilitating scale-up predictions for biomass conversion efficiencies reported at 50-70% bio-oil yields in pilot tests. Experimental macroscale methods utilize bench- or gram-scale reactors to validate models and quantify mass balances, product spectra, and compound distributions under realistic conditions. For instance, multi-scale pyrolysis studies on engineering plastics like conduct experiments from microgram to gram quantities, demonstrating consistent monomer recovery rates of 80-90% across scales while identifying discrepancies in secondary reactions at larger sizes due to heat transfer limitations. Fixed-bed reactors enable analysis of waste biomass pyrolysis, where stepwise heating from 200-600°C yields detailed gas chromatography data on volatile evolution, contrasting with microscale overestimations of primary products by 10-20%. These approaches reveal causal factors like intraparticle gradients, which microscale methods overlook, improving predictive accuracy for industrial applications with heating rates of 10-100°C/min. Machine learning (ML) methods complement macroscale analysis by leveraging experimental datasets to predict pyrolysis outcomes, addressing the limitations of physics-based models in complex, high-dimensional systems. Random forest and artificial neural network models, trained on composition and process parameters (e.g., temperature 400-700°C, particle size 0.1-2 mm), achieve prediction accuracies of R² > 0.9 for bio-oil yields from lignocellulosic feedstocks, outperforming traditional regressions by capturing nonlinear interactions. and support vector regression frameworks predict product distributions (bio-oil, , ) with mean absolute errors below 5 wt%, using inputs like proximate analysis and pyrolysis severity, as validated against fixed-bed data from over 100 experiments. Interpretable ML models, such as those employing SHAP analysis, identify key predictors like content influencing formation, enabling optimization for yields up to 60% bio-oil while highlighting data biases in training sets dominated by woody . Hybrid macroscale-ML integrations enhance causal realism by combining simulations with data-driven corrections; for example, ML-augmented CFD models refine kinetic parameters from mesoscale data, reducing prediction errors for plastic pyrolysis oil yields from 15% to under 5% across feedstocks like and . However, ML predictions remain contingent on quality, with limited to interpolated conditions, as evidenced by poorer (R² ~0.7) on underrepresented high-ash biomasses. Recent advances, including from 150+ literature datasets, forecast fast pyrolysis with uncertainties below 10%, supporting scalable analysis for .

Safety and Environmental Considerations

Operational Safety Challenges

Pyrolysis operations face significant risks from high-temperature processing, typically ranging from 400°C to 900°C, which can exceed the autoignition temperatures of evolved gases and lead to or if cooling systems fail. The thermal of feedstocks releases flammable volatiles such as , , and light hydrocarbons, creating explosive atmospheres within reactors or downstream piping, particularly during the initial heating phase when rapid gas evolution occurs. Explosion hazards are exacerbated by potential oxygen ingress, leaks, or surges from gas accumulation, as demonstrated by multiple industrial incidents; for instance, a 2012 at an pyrolysis plant in , , killed eight workers due to ignited pyrolysis gases. Similarly, a repeat internal on October 8, 2021, at a P4O plastic pyrolysis reactor in the United States tore open the reactor's hinged endcap, highlighting vulnerabilities in batch systems where unpredicted gas yields overwhelm venting capacity. These events underscore the challenge of maintaining inert atmospheres and precise control amid variable feedstock compositions, which can unpredictably alter gas production rates. Workers encounter acute risks from toxic gas releases, including , , and volatile organic compounds, which can cause immediate , respiratory distress, or long-term health effects without adequate detection and ventilation; surveys indicate that up to 60% of pyrolysis plant personnel report feeling unsafe due to poor air . Handling of hot pyrolysis residues, such as char or , poses and mechanical injury threats, compounded by the pyrophoric of some solids that ignite upon air exposure. Equipment integrity failures, including seal degradation or catalyst bed blockages, further amplify these dangers, as seen in cases where inadequate led to breaches and secondary fires. Overall, the inherent variability of pyrolysis kinetics demands rigorous monitoring, yet lapses in regulatory oversight and operator continue to contribute to recurrent shortfalls in commercial facilities.

Environmental Impacts and Emissions

Pyrolysis generates emissions primarily from the of organic materials, releasing volatile gases and that require capture and treatment to minimize environmental release. Key gaseous emissions include (CO), (CO2), (CH4), (H2), and non-methane volatile organic compounds (VOCs), with concentrations varying by feedstock type, temperature (typically 400–800°C), and residence time. For pyrolysis, CO2 emissions can range from 0.5–1.5 kg per kg of dry processed, while CH4 yields are lower (0.01–0.1 kg/kg) due to the anaerobic conditions limiting complete oxidation. Particulate matter (PM), including fine , and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) form from incomplete of complex hydrocarbons, posing risks of atmospheric deposition and secondary aerosol formation if not filtered. When pyrolysis syngas or bio-oil is combusted for energy recovery, additional pollutants emerge, such as nitrogen oxides () from nitrogen-containing feedstocks under high-temperature conditions (up to 200–500 ppm in exhaust gases) and sulfur oxides (SOx) from sulfurous materials like or tires (10–100 ppm depending on desulfurization). These emissions contribute to and formation, though pyrolysis inherently produces less NOx than open-flame incineration due to the oxygen-deficient environment reducing thermal NOx pathways. In life-cycle assessments of plastic waste pyrolysis, net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions vary widely: from a 220% reduction (approximately -308 g CO2-eq/kg plastic waste) when products displace fuels, to 60% higher emissions if energy penalties from processing dominate. Compared to , pyrolysis often exhibits lower direct air outputs, with studies showing 20–50% reductions in PM and VOCs for , attributed to the absence of excess oxygen minimizing formation. However, unmanaged off-gas venting or inefficient char disposal can elevate local impacts, including from leachable PAHs and contributions to via short-lived climate pollutants like in PM. from pyrolysis sequesters carbon (up to 50% of feedstock carbon retained stably), potentially offsetting 0.5–2.5 tons CO2-eq per ton of if applied to soils, though this benefit diminishes without long-term stability verification. Regulatory frameworks, such as U.S. EPA standards under the Clean Air Act for other solid waste incineration (OSWI) units, classify many pyrolysis systems processing municipal waste as requiring controls for PM (limits of 0.015 lb/MMBtu), CO (40 ppm), and HCl (comparable to incinerators), with ongoing rules ensuring pyrolysis does not evade emission limits through reclassification. Effective mitigation involves cyclone separators for PM removal (>90% efficiency), scrubbers for acid gases, and thermal oxidizers for VOCs/PAHs, reducing stack emissions to below 10 mg/Nm³ for particulates in modern facilities. Despite these measures, site-specific monitoring is essential, as feedstock variability (e.g., contaminated plastics) can increase toxic releases, underscoring the need for empirical validation over assumed cleanliness.

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Formation

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) form during pyrolysis through the of organic feedstocks, particularly hydrocarbons and , via radical-initiated reactions at temperatures typically ranging from 500 to 1000 °C in an oxygen-limited environment. These compounds arise from the fragmentation of aliphatic chains into smaller radicals, followed by hydrogen abstraction, cyclization, and aromatization processes that build fused ring structures. The H-abstraction-C₂H₂-addition (HACA) mechanism is a dominant pathway, where aromatic radicals abstract hydrogen to form aryl radicals, which then add (C₂H₂) molecules, enabling ring growth and PAH enlargement. This process is prevalent in the pyrolysis of fuels, , and waste materials, with higher temperatures accelerating radical formation and PAH yields up to an optimal point before secondary occurs. In biomass pyrolysis, such as that of or -rich feedstocks like or wheat straw, PAHs emerge primarily from via cracking of aromatic rings and bimolecular condensation reactions. For instance, pyrolysis of pellets at 400–700 °C releases PAHs like and , with total concentrations peaking around 600 °C due to enhanced and that favors polyaromatic structures. contributes disproportionately, as its inherent aromatic units undergo and polymerization, yielding up to 10–20% of pyrolytic tars as PAHs, compared to lower yields from hemicellulose or , which first form furans and anhydrosugars before aromatizing. Coal pyrolysis similarly produces PAHs through devolatilization, with emissions increasing then decreasing with temperature (e.g., peaking at 800 °C), often accumulating in particulate matter like PM₂.₅. Feedstock composition and process conditions modulate PAH formation; for example, metal oxides as catalysts can suppress yields by promoting cracking over cyclization, reducing total PAHs by 20–50% in some biomass systems. In waste pyrolysis, such as municipal solid waste or sewage sludge, PAHs partition into biochars, tars, and gases, with biochar retaining 10–100 µg/g of priority PAHs like benzopyrene, influenced by holding time and heating rate. Low-temperature pyrolysis (300–650 °C) of cellulose favors smaller PAHs via direct dehydration pathways, while higher temperatures shift toward larger, more stable structures. These PAHs pose environmental risks as persistent, bioaccumulative toxins, but pyrolysis itself can sometimes lower total PAH content in sludge by volatilizing lighter congeners.

Controversies and Criticisms

Critics of pyrolysis technologies, particularly for plastics and waste tire recycling, argue that the process often fails to deliver on promises of , functioning instead as a form of greenwashing that diverts attention from reducing production and improving mechanical . A 2022 analysis by the Center for International highlighted that chemical recycling methods like pyrolysis yield low-quality outputs requiring further processing, with energy-intensive operations potentially increasing net compared to virgin production in some scenarios. Similarly, a Yale Environment 360 investigation in 2023 cited lifecycle assessments showing pyrolysis oil production from plastics can have a higher impact than extracting crude oil, due to inefficiencies in yield (often below 80%) and the need for high-temperature operations that release unburned hydrocarbons. Environmental pollution from poorly regulated pyrolysis plants has drawn significant scrutiny, especially in developing regions where small-scale tire pyrolysis operations have led to exceedances of effluent standards. A 2021 study in the Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering found that tire pyrolysis wastewater in such facilities contained elevated levels of , , , , and beyond permissible limits, contaminating and water bodies. Open or inadequately controlled systems can emit polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrogen-containing PAHs, , and , exacerbating air quality issues; a 2018 review noted these risks in non-enclosed pyrolysis, contrasting with claims of inert-atmosphere cleanliness. In the U.S., the Agency's 2023 proposal to classify pyrolysis oils as under RCRA sparked opposition from industry groups, who contended it would stifle innovation, while environmental advocates viewed it as necessary to prevent unregulated disposal of toxic byproducts. Safety concerns center on the inherent risks of handling volatile pyrolysis gases, with multiple documented s underscoring operational hazards. A 2023 report in Transactions detailed a repeat at a plastics pyrolysis plant in , attributing it to ignition of accumulated hydrocarbons in the , resulting in s and toxic releases; such incidents highlight limited regulatory oversight in the sector, where and risks stem from buildups and oxygen ingress. Pyrolysis of tires amplifies these dangers due to rapid gas evolution, with historical cases in and showing explosions propelling components at high velocities, causing fatalities; guidelines from bodies like the Infrastructure Health & Safety Association emphasize deflating and unseating tires before any heating to mitigate pyrolysis-induced bursts. Additionally, inert gas protocols using , while reducing likelihood, pose asphyxiation threats in confined spaces, as noted in a 2024 risk of plastic-to-fuel facilities.

Recent Advances and Future Prospects

Technological Innovations (2020s)

In the 2020s, pyrolysis technologies have advanced toward greater scalability and efficiency, particularly for converting waste and into fuels and chemicals, driven by demands for solutions and decarbonization. Innovations emphasize catalytic processes to enhance product yields and quality, with peer-reviewed studies highlighting improvements in polyolefinic pyrolysis, where catalysts like zeolites reduce cracking temperatures and increase selectivity up to 80% under optimized conditions. Large-scale reactor designs, such as those separating melting from pyrolysis reactions, have enabled commercial chemical integration with crackers, achieving higher throughput and lower use compared to batch systems. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis emerged as a key innovation, offering rapid, volumetric heating that minimizes heat transfer limitations and improves energy efficiency by 20-30% over conventional methods. In 2025, commercial announcements highlighted -powered systems for , converting into reusable monomers with reduced emissions. Catalytic variants, combining with metal oxides, have boosted yields from to over 50 vol.% in lab-scale tests, addressing selectivity challenges in non-catalytic pyrolysis. These systems also support co-pyrolysis of and plastics, synergistically upgrading heterogeneous feeds to produce upgraded bio-oils with lower oxygen content. Plasma pyrolysis advanced for hazardous waste treatment, utilizing high-temperature arcs to achieve near-complete decomposition of plastics into syngas and minimal char, with 2025 reviews noting reactor designs that enhance gas-phase cracking efficiency. For methane pyrolysis, catalyst innovations and molten metal reactors reduced energy inputs to below 10 kWh/kg H2, positioning it as a low-carbon hydrogen pathway by avoiding water-gas shift byproducts. Machine learning integration optimized process parameters in biomass pyrolysis, predicting yields with 95% accuracy and enabling real-time adjustments for variable feedstocks. These developments, while promising, require validation at industrial scales to confirm economic viability amid feedstock variability and catalyst deactivation issues. The global pyrolysis plant market was valued at USD 935 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 1,584 million by 2031, expanding at a (CAGR) of 8.0%, driven primarily by demand for solutions and initiatives. Similarly, the pyrolysis oil market stood at USD 1,837.4 million in 2024, with forecasts indicating growth to USD 3,273.5 million by 2031 at a CAGR of 8.6%, fueled by applications in production and chemical feedstocks from and waste plastics. Segment-specific trends show pyrolysis oil growing from USD 0.6 billion in 2024 to USD 1.8 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of 20.1%, reflecting advancements in fast pyrolysis for bio-oil yields, while plastic waste pyrolysis oil is estimated at USD 673.5 million in 2024 with a more modest CAGR of 5.5% through 2034 due to feedstock variability and refining costs. Commercialization efforts have focused on scaling tire and plastic pyrolysis for oil recovery, with the tire pyrolysis oil market exceeding USD 375 million in 2025 and anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 5.3%, supported by end-of-life tire recycling mandates in regions like and . Key developments include continuous pyrolysis plants achieving 720 hours of uninterrupted processing in 2024, demonstrating improved operational reliability for industrial deployment. However, practical rollout faces hurdles, including feedstock heterogeneity in mixed plastics, high capital expenditures for equipment—valued at USD 184.7 million market-wide in 2024—and economic pressures leading to project delays or failures, as evidenced by an expected "pyrolysis bubble burst" in 2024 amid overcapacity projections doubling to 2.1 million tonnes per year by 2025 without commensurate demand. Market trends indicate regional concentration in , where large-scale projects for waste plastics and tires are accelerating due to and regulatory pushes against landfilling, though global adoption lags in Western markets owing to stricter emissions standards and competition from . Pyrolysis equipment demand is forecasted to surge from USD 184.7 million in 2024 to USD 1,725 million by 2033, propelled by innovations in catalytic processes to enhance quality and reduce char residues, yet remains constrained by inconsistent product yields and the need for integrated refining to meet fuel specifications. Overall, while projections signal robust expansion tied to goals, real-world scalability depends on resolving techno-economic barriers, with waste plastics holding 55.7% of the market share in 2024 due to their high-volume availability.

Ongoing Challenges and Research Directions

One persistent challenge in pyrolysis is the high of the process, which requires sustained heating to 400–800°C in an inert atmosphere, often consuming 20–30% of the content in the products for feedstocks, thereby limiting economic viability. Feedstock variability, including content, , and composition in waste plastics or , results in inconsistent yields of bio-oil, char, and , complicating process control and product standardization. from bench-scale to industrial operations faces hurdles in design, such as poor and in large volumes, leading to hotspots, incomplete , and reduced efficiency below 70% for some continuous-flow systems. Emissions of pollutants like volatile organic compounds, , and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during pyrolysis also demand robust strategies, despite lower overall COx and SOx outputs compared to . Current emphasizes innovation to enhance selectivity toward high-value products, such as aromatics from , with metal oxides and zeolites showing promise in reducing coke deposition by up to 50% under optimized conditions. approaches, including mesoscale simulations coupling and reaction kinetics, are advancing to predict particle-level behaviors and guide reactor optimization, addressing gaps in traditional lumped-parameter models. Hybrid techniques, like catalytic fast pyrolysis integrated with upgrading steps, aim to improve bio-oil stability and yield oxygenated compounds suitable for fuels, with studies targeting oxygen content reduction from 40% to under 10%. Emerging directions include solar-driven pyrolysis to minimize dependency, achieving temperatures via with efficiencies up to 60% in pilot tests, and process intensification through or plasma assistance for faster reaction rates and lower energy inputs. Long-term efforts focus on life-cycle assessments to quantify net emissions reductions, potentially cutting CO2 equivalents by 60% relative to landfilling for pyrolysis.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemical-engineering/pyrolysis
  2. https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/wyndmoor-pa/eastern-regional-research-center/docs/biomass-pyrolysis-research-1/what-is-pyrolysis/
  3. https://courses.ems.psu.edu/egee439/node/537
  4. https://ucrra.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/GWE-AREC-Presentation.210310.pdf
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10097134/
  6. https://berc.berkeley.edu/news/methane-pyrolysis-alternative-producing-low-emission-hydrogen-feedstock
  7. https://task34.ieabioenergy.com/pyrolysis-principles/
  8. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/70273
  9. https://www.energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/thermochemical-conversion-processes
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7240377/
  11. https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/kinetic-parameters-of-biomass-pyrolysis-by-tga/
  12. https://www.nist.gov/glossary-term/30146
  13. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90366
  14. https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/pyrolysis-and-gasification
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/pyrolysis
  16. https://www.energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/full-text-glossary
  17. https://glossary.slb.com/terms/p/pyrolysis
  18. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6936
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122006049
  20. https://academic.oup.com/ce/article/8/4/61/7706510
  21. https://blog.mywastesolution.com/types-of-pyrolysis-processes-to-conserve-renewable-resources/
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/pyrolysis
  23. https://biochar-international.org/about-biochar/how-to-make-biochar/biochar-production-technologies/
  24. https://www.dva.com.vn/blogs/types-of-pyrolysis-processes-a-comprehensive-guide
  25. http://biofuelsacademy.org/index.html%253Fp=623.html
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/hydropyrolysis
  27. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03263
  28. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2979
  29. https://www.aensiweb.com/old/jasr/jasr/2008/1627-1636.pdf
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223562705_Fundamental_reactions_of_free_radicals_relevant_to_pyrolysis_reactions
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165237024000159
  32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17597269.2025.2537515
  33. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/1/246
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11721799/
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953422003439
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544221011087
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8346647/
  38. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2018/ra/c7ra12187c
  39. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10279
  40. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-93407-1
  41. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c06363
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12536
  43. https://globalticltd.co.uk/blogs/blog/from-ancient-flames-to-modern-marvels-the-fascinating-history-of-charcoal-production
  44. https://charcoalbbqbkk.com/blogs/news/the-invention-and-early-usage-of-coal-and-charcoal-for-cooking
  45. https://nitramcharcoal.com/blogs/blog/history-charcoal
  46. https://www.charcotec.com/history
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618220306406
  48. https://berc.berkeley.edu/news/rediscovering-ancient-wisdom-biochar
  49. https://hvfarmscape.org/join-in/contribute-information/charcoal/
  50. https://www.iup.edu/library/departments/archives/coal/mining-history/history-of-coke.html
  51. https://www.woodville-experience.org/beehive-oven
  52. https://www.911metallurgist.com/blog/beehive-oven/
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166111608707477
  54. https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/362524/view/19th-century-production-of-coal-gas
  55. https://historicengland.org.uk/content/docs/advice/architectural-use-wood-coal-tar-england-context181-sep24/
  56. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=44438
  57. https://ext.vt.edu/content/dam/ext_vt_edu/topics/environment-resources/charcoal/fplr2213.pdf
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/wood-pyrolysis
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0255270101001350
  60. https://www.aiche.org/resources/publications/cep/2025/june/ethylene-production-and-its-role-shaping-modern-world
  61. https://www.klmtechgroup.com/PDF/Articles/articles/Pyrolysis%2520Furnace%2520rev%2520intro.pdf
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Historical-summary-of-the-evolution-up-to-2011-of-steam-cracking-coil-alloys-Reprinted_fig1_328509216
  63. https://www.apexpetroconsultants.com/olefins-basics/story-of-ethylene-production-the-steam-cracking-process
  64. https://www.environmental-expert.com/articles/when-was-plastic-pyrolysis-first-developed-and-implemented-1140015
  65. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00177
  66. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00641
  67. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/2/332
  68. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/h2-shot-summit-panel2-methane-pyrolysis.pdf
  69. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/open.202100184
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/coal-pyrolysis
  71. https://nordicfoodlab.org/blog/2013/10/wood-for-food-a-pyrolysis/
  72. https://openagriculturejournal.com/VOLUME/4/PAGE/111/
  73. https://ext.vt.edu/natural-resources/charcoal/charcoalmaking.html
  74. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00592
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S096014812500237X
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10979137/
  77. https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bbb.1814
  78. https://pacokeovens.org/what-is-coke/
  79. https://openresearch.newcastle.edu.au/articles/thesis/Mechanisms_of_metaplast_formation_during_coal_pyrolysis/28987556
  80. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11705-019-1850-z
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372397405_Processing_of_Coal_into_Coke_with_the_Pyrolysis_Method
  82. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/220092/cdc_220092_DS1.pdf
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378382023003594
  84. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c02908
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378925000410
  86. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c03494
  87. https://academic.oup.com/ooms/article/1/1/itab014/6446520
  88. https://www.waste2energyworld.com/pyrolysis.htm
  89. http://m.wastetireoil.com/Pyrolysis_faq/Pyrolysis_Plant/definition_of_pyrolysis_612.html
  90. https://bakerpedia.com/processes/caramelization/
  91. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10408398.2020.1867056
  92. https://www.nal.usda.gov/research-tools/food-safety-research-projects/investigation-formation-pahs-foods-prepared-home-and
  93. https://the-gist.org/2016/11/why-you-shouldnt-burn-your-toast/
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620354147
  95. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-021-03915-7
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3951573/
  97. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5082
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652621037914
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5569640/
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524000618
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11044251/
  102. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c03050
  103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112715
  104. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01679
  105. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47534-8
  106. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c01551
  107. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8783/5/3/54
  108. https://cenusa.iastate.edu/files/cenusa_2019_019.pdf
  109. https://www.hnei.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/Fast-Pyrolysis-of-Tropical-Biomass-Species.pdf
  110. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/04/f14/pyrolysis_report_summary.pdf
  111. https://www.ars.usda.gov/news-events/news/research-news/2014/usda-researchers-simplify-pyrolysis-processes-for-bio-oil-production/
  112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366646436_Pyrolysis_process_for_syngas_production
  113. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35475387/
  114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666052024000037
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11492265/
  116. https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/137491/1/Mehrabian2022_MPhil.pdf
  117. https://www.unileoben.ac.at/fileadmin/shares/researchh2c/Scheiblehner2023_Hydrogen_Production_by_Methane_Pyrolysis_in_Molten.pdf
  118. https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/22RS-27_Siriwardane.pdf
  119. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2393
  120. https://modernhydrogen.com/
  121. https://ekonapower.com/ekona-featured-in-dob-energy/
  122. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/graphitic-energy-commissions-pilot-plant-130000069.html
  123. https://fuelcellsworks.com/2025/07/08/green-investment/tulum-energy-revives-methane-pyrolysis-breakthrough-nets-27-m-in-seed-funding
  124. https://www.c2es.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/methane-pyrolysis-for-hydrogen-production.pdf
  125. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ee/d4ee06191h
  126. https://academic.oup.com/ooms/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/oxfmat/itab014/45723679/itab014.pdf
  127. https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/blog/ethylene-production-methods-a-comprehensive-guide-to-steam-cracking-and-other-techniques-1449
  128. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-41273-4
  129. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6210562B1/en
  130. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04835
  131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378382024001188
  132. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03728
  133. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bbb.2066
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25004465
  135. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24508091/
  136. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/ey/d4ey00154k
  137. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/54198
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8839516/
  139. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00193a079
  140. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10845-021-01809-9
  141. https://www.intelmarketresearch.com/spray-pyrolysis-system-market-9492
  142. https://www.linde-engineering.com/products-and-services/process-plants/petrochemical-technologies/steam-cracking-technology
  143. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/gc/d3gc03858k
  144. https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aic.10016
  145. https://www.ogj.com/general-interest/companies/article/17241411/ethylene-technologies-1-novel-ethylene-technologies-developing-but-steam-cracking-remains-king
  146. https://www.emerson.com/documents/automation/manuals-guides-chemical-sourcebook-chapter-1-2-ethylene-production-polysilicone-production-fisher-en-138242.pdf
  147. https://www.metaltek.com/market-solutions/petrochemical/ethylene-cracking/
  148. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351239110_Ethylene_Yield_from_a_Large_Scale_Naphtha_Pyrolysis_Cracking_Utilizing_Response_Surface_Methodology
  149. https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/Sort_21795.pdf
  150. https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/11402/InTechProduction_of_chemicals_from_selective_fast_pyrolysis_of_biomass.pdf
  151. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep01120
  152. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2022/gc/d2gc00302c
  153. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8294
  154. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-1559-6_41
  155. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/spray-pyrolysis
  156. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10832-005-0870-x
  157. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6829546/
  158. https://www.cleansin.com/applications/news/432.html
  159. https://www.graphenea.com/pages/cvd-graphene
  160. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11512856/
  161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378382021003052
  162. https://studentenergy.org/conversion/pyrolysis/
  163. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/biomass/
  164. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7738282/
  165. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425000342
  166. https://engineering.yale.edu/news-and-events/news/device-convert-plastic-waste-fuel
  167. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9936530/
  168. https://www.propublica.org/article/delusion-advanced-chemical-plastic-recycling-pyrolysis
  169. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0734242X241306605
  170. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yehia-Khalil/post/Comprehensive_MSW_RDF_Gasification_Pyrolisis_Plant_Listing_that_Generates_Electricity/attachment/59d6436879197b807799ee02/AS%253A443335669227520%25401482710868012/download/A%2BComprehensive%2BReview%2Bof%2BBiomass%2BPyrolysis%2Bas%2Ba%2BProcess%2Bof%2Brenewable%2Benergy%2Bconversion.pdf
  171. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319610321000028
  172. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4820106/
  173. https://mostwiedzy.pl/pl/publication/download/0/pyrolysis-of-waste-biomass-technical-and-process-achievements-and-future-development-a-review_202308231340415384401.pdf
  174. https://www.jeeng.net/pdf-159347-87964?filename=Analysis%2520of%2520the%2520Use%2520of.pdf
  175. https://www.haiqienvtech.com/blog/top-10-applications-of-biomass-pyrolysis.html
  176. https://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/221495547/cleantechnol-06-00010.pdf
  177. https://institutoventuri.org/ojs/index.php/FIRS/article/download/168/144/160
  178. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2054/1/012043
  179. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202301.0203
  180. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/artpub/2025/311409/processes-13-00940-v2.pdf
  181. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165237024001347
  182. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/su/d4su00504j
  183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11677625/
  184. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366053700_Pyrolysis_of_mixed_plastic_waste_Predicting_the_product_yields
  185. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04745
  186. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9388221/
  187. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-024-33282-1
  188. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165237019308241
  189. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X2400045X
  190. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357864643_A_review_on_catalytic_pyrolysis_of_plastic_wastes_to_high-value_products
  191. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c05631
  192. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165237025004139
  193. https://www.schwing-technologies.com/thermal-cleaning/cleaning-methods
  194. https://www.thermal-cleaning-system.com/product/vacuum-pyrolysis-furnace/
  195. https://www.kerstencoating.com/services/pyrolysis-and-thermal-cleaning/
  196. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51369955_Analysis_of_Pyrolysis_Products_of_Methamphetamine
  197. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25865019/
  198. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165237023003959
  199. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379073820300359
  200. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36516105/
  201. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7357058/
  202. https://www.cvnindustries.com/en/thermal-cleaning/thermal-cleaning-pyrolysis/
  203. https://www.schwing-technologies.com/thermal-cleaning/
  204. https://rewinz.com/solution/thermal-cleaning-system-pyrolysis-oven/
  205. https://www.dunnheat.com/news/cleaning-process-equipment-by-thermal-decomposition.html
  206. https://www.pcpconline.com/controlled-pyrolysis-ovens.html
  207. https://sonicsolutionsltd.com/pyrolysis-burn-off-thermal-stripping-service/
  208. https://www.boco-extruders.eu/device-for-pyrolytic-cleaning-of-screws
  209. https://www.nordson.com/en/divisions/polymer-processing-systems/jet-cleaners---product-category-page
  210. https://heat-exchanger-world.com/thermal-cleaning-not-an-alternative-but-a-better-way-of-cleaning/
  211. https://www.thermoclean.com/en/our-services/cleaning-heat-exchangers/
  212. https://www.arenacomet.eu/page/pyrolysis-ovens-paintstripping-plastic-removal/f1.html
  213. https://www.thermal-cleaning-system.com/product/controlled-pyrolysis-burn-off-oven/
  214. https://abl-technic.pl/en/ABL/thermal-method-pyrolysis/
  215. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212200795X
  216. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7126006/
  217. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/21/9856
  218. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378382014003464
  219. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-82830-9
  220. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165237022000341
  221. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c02250
  222. https://analyzing-testing.netzsch.com/en-US/application-literature/unlocking-the-pyrolysis-of-olive-stone-biomass-tga-analysis-and-the-appropriate-kinetic-approach
  223. https://www.tainstruments.com/applications-notes/thermogravimetric-analysis-tga-as-a-screening-tool-for-plastic-waste-pyrolysis-ta482/
  224. https://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid11.0469
  225. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/pyrolysis-gas-chromatography
  226. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10005324/
  227. https://www.emsl.pnnl.gov/science/instruments-resources/pyrolysis-gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry
  228. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10330118/
  229. https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/context/earth-environ-studies-facpubs/article/1066/viewcontent/Kruge_2015_PyroInEnvironResearch.pdf
  230. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165237098000990
  231. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12103379/
  232. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44454-025-00001-5
  233. https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/the-efficacy-of-py-gc-ms-in-the-microplastic-analysis-of-human-blood
  234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/pyrolysis-gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry
  235. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c12599
  236. https://www.eag.com/techniques/mass-spec/pyrolysis-gc-ms/
  237. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-023-00436-z
  238. https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/9/12/301
  239. https://www.nrel.gov/computational-science/mesoflow
  240. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/marc.202500161
  241. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Fuel..157....1M/abstract
  242. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ef901254g
  243. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165237024001414
  244. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10311-024-01767-7
  245. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40523416/
  246. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10119934/
  247. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025Fuel..39435000P/abstract
  248. https://www.tappi.org/content/events/22PEERS_IBBC/IBBC5.1_Mani.P.pdf
  249. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/324235501/Inherent_hazards_and_limited_regulatory_oversight_in_the_waste_plastic_recycling_sector_repeat_explosion_at_pyrolysis_plant.pdf
  250. https://i-pec.ru/en/useful-info/pyrolysis-plant-disasters
  251. https://www.cetjournal.it/cet/23/99/041.pdf
  252. https://www.sihaienergytech.com/news/safety-best-practices-for-operating-a-pyrolysis-machine.html
  253. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO202328433321556.page
  254. https://www.xingfupyrolysis.com/news/assessing-safety-risks-in-pyrolysis-plants-what-hazards-to-mitigate/
  255. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12508987/
  256. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5541
  257. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1169
  258. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016236120308590
  259. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/11/7/149
  260. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12175162/
  261. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960852425008958
  262. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10463889
  263. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-07/fact-sheet_withdrawal-notice_-may242023.pdf
  264. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12301532/
  265. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8694769/
  266. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03513
  267. https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/effects-of-pyrolysis-temperature-on-the-release-characteristics-of-polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbons-during-pyrolysis-of-corn-stover-pellet/
  268. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9639
  269. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016236124020842
  270. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-95847-5
  271. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512402351X?dgcid=rss_sd_all
  272. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003JAAP...66...51M/abstract
  273. https://cen.acs.org/environment/recycling/Amid-controversy-industry-goes-plastics-pyrolysis/100/i36
  274. https://e360.yale.edu/features/advanced-plastics-recycling-pyrolysis
  275. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352186421002133
  276. https://www.lowimpact.org/posts/pyrolysis-not-solution-plastics-problem/
  277. https://www.petro-online.com/news/synthetic-fuels/180/international-environmental-technology/epa-sparks-controversy-by-proposing-restrictions-on-pyrolysis-oil/61245
  278. https://www.ihsa.ca/pdfs/safety_talks/tire_explosions_pyrolysis.pdf
  279. https://www.marsh.com/en/industries/energy-and-power/insights/plastic-waste-fuel-understanding-key-risks.html
  280. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165237024002067
  281. https://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/news/2025/10/irpc-rewind-advancement-in-large-scale-pyrolysis-technology-for-chemical-recycling-of-plastics/
  282. https://www.lummustechnology.com/news/lummus-and-resynergi-announce-commercial-availability-of-microwave-powered-plastic-pyrolysis-technology
  283. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921344923002896
  284. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165237025003328
  285. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/3261/1/190001/3348387/Recent-advances-in-plasma-pyrolysis-for-plastic
  286. https://eureka.patsnap.com/report-methane-pyrolysis-cost-effectiveness-analysis
  287. https://unitedearth.energy/is-pyrolysis-the-future-of-clean-energy-emerging-trends-for-2025/
  288. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/79564.pdf
  289. https://www.intelmarketresearch.com/pyrolysis-plant-market-9490
  290. https://www.precisionbusinessinsights.com/market-reports/pyrolysis-oil-market
  291. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/6093284/biomass-pyrolysis-oil-market-global-industry
  292. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/plastic-waste-pyrolysis-oil-market
  293. https://www.researchnester.com/reports/tire-pyrolysis-oil-market/6233
  294. https://www.bestongroup.com/company-news/breakthrough-achievement-720-hour-continuous-biomass-pyrolysis-technology-success/
  295. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/gc/d3gc04396g
  296. https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/market-reports/pyrolysis-equipment-market-102600
  297. https://luxresearchinc.com/blog/2024-is-the-year-the-pyrolysis-bubble-bursts/
  298. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/fully-continuous-pyrolysis-plant-218050
  299. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/pyrolysis-oil-market
  300. https://kronika.ac/wp-content/uploads/38-KKJ2531.pdf
  301. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016236122016222
  302. https://globalimpactcoalition.com/scaling-pyrolysis/
  303. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ra/d5ra03170b
  304. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365879820_Current_Challenges_and_Perspectives_for_the_Catalytic_Pyrolysis_of_Lignocellulosic_Biomass_to_High-Value_Products
  305. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382880879_Worldwide_developments_and_challenges_for_solar_pyrolysis
  306. https://www.plasticsindustry.org/articles/how-pyrolysis-is-improving-the-quality-of-recycled-plastics/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.