Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Lesbian
View on Wikipedia


| Sexual orientation |
|---|
| Part of a series on |
| LGBTQ people |
|---|
|
|
A lesbian is a homosexual woman or girl.[3][4][5]: 48 The word is also used for women in relation to their sexual identity or sexual behavior, regardless of sexual orientation, or as an adjective to characterize or associate nouns with female homosexuality or same-sex attraction.[4][5]: 22
Relatively little in history was documented to describe women's lives in general or female homosexuality in particular. The earliest mentions of lesbianism date to at least the 500s BC.
Lesbians' current rights vary widely worldwide, ranging from severe abuse and legal persecution to general acceptance and legal protections.
Etymology
[edit]
The word lesbian is the demonym of the Greek island of Lesbos, home to the 6th-century BCE poet Sappho.[3] Little of Sappho's poetry survives, but her remaining poetry discusses women's daily lives, their relationships and rituals, and Sappho's love for women.[6]: 47–49
Before the mid-19th century,[7] the word lesbian referred to any derivative or aspect of Lesbos, including a type of wine.[a] A shift of the word to describe erotic relationships between women had been documented in 1870.[9]
In 1875, critic George Saintsbury referred to Baudelaire's poem "Delphine and Hippolyte" (a poem about love between two women and without reference to Lesbos) as "Lesbian".[10] In 1890, the term lesbian was used in the National Medical Dictionary as an adjective to describe tribadism (as "lesbian love").[11]
The terms lesbian, invert and homosexual were interchangeable with sapphist and sapphism around the turn of the 20th century.[9] The use of lesbian in medical literature became prominent; by 1925, the word was recorded as a noun to mean the female equivalent of a sodomite.[9][12]
Sexuality and identity
[edit]


Biological factors
[edit]Prenatal androgen exposure correlates with same-sex sexual behavior in women.[18] Biological correlates known to be affected by prenatal hormone exposure -- such as the human cochlear amplifier auditory system,[19] and finger length ratios[20] -- have been shown to vary by sexual orientation in women. The finding that lesbians' digit ratios differ from those of heterosexual women has been replicated in cross-cultural studies.[20]
Genetics also play a role; around 20% of the variance of sexual orientation in women is controlled by genetics.[21]
Lesbian identity formation
[edit]When a woman realizes she is a lesbian, it may cause an "existential crisis". When a woman was raised in an environment with negative stereotypes of lesbians, she may need to work through these stereotypes and prejudices to come to terms with her orientation.[22]: 93
Lesbians in modern times share an identity that parallels those built on ethnicity, including the concept of group heritage and group pride.[23]
Compared to gay men, lesbians more often developed their sexual self-concepts either alone or in intimate relationships, instead of in communities, and disclosed them less often.[22]: 153
Self-identification and behavior
[edit]Some women experience a consistently lesbian orientation. Other women experience varying degrees of fluidity in their orientation.[24]
Lesbians who have never had sex with men may be referred to as "gold star lesbians." Lesbians who have previously had sex with men before coming out may face ridicule from other lesbians or identity challenges with regard to defining what it means to be a lesbian.[25]
Some researchers observe that behavior and identity sometimes do not match: self-identified straight women may have sex with women, or self-identified lesbians may have sex with men.[5]: 22 [26]
Several sexology studies have found that the sexual behavior and attractions of exclusively-lesbian women are significantly more likely to be aligned with their sexual identity than they are in exclusively-heterosexual women. These included studies of reported attraction throughout the fertility cycle (in which the higher-fertility phase intensified lesbian attractions for exclusively-lesbian women), of direct measures of arousal towards different imagery, etc.[27]
The importance of sex
[edit]Some arguments are about the concept of lesbian bed death. In a 1983 survey, sexologists Philip Blumstein and Pepper Schwartz asked couples "About how often during the last year have you and your partner had sex relations?" and found that long-term lesbian couples named lower numbers than heterosexual or homosexual male couples.[28] This conclusion became known as "lesbian bed death".[29]
Some arguments attested that the study was flawed and misrepresented accurate sexual contact between women. Other critiques suggest that the language "sex relations" could easily be misinterpreted to mean "heterosexual intercourse." Other critiques suggest that sexual contact between women has increased since 1983.[30]
Researchers report that lesbian and heterosexual women are just as likely to view achieving orgasm as important,[31] and that the two groups report statistically equivalent rates of overall sexual and romantic satisfaction.[32][33] The research suggests that lesbian women tend to achieve said satisfaction through higher quality rather than more frequent sex, and that they engage in different romantic and sexual scripts than heterosexual women.[33][31]
Female homosexuality without identity in western culture
[edit]There has been extensive debate as to what qualifies a historic relationship as 'lesbian'. In 1989, an academic cohort named the Lesbian History Group wrote:
Because of society's reluctance to admit that lesbians exist, a high degree of certainty is expected before historians or biographers are allowed to use the label. Evidence that would suffice in any other situation is inadequate here... A woman who never married, who lived with another woman, whose friends were mostly women, or who moved in known lesbian or mixed gay circles, may well have been a lesbian. ... But this sort of evidence is not 'proof'. What our critics want is incontrovertible evidence of sexual activity between women. This is almost impossible to find.[34]: 184
Female sexuality is often not adequately represented in texts and documents. Until very recently, much of what has been documented about women's sexuality has been written by men, in the context of male understanding, and relevant to women's associations to men—as their wives, daughters, or mothers, for example.[35]
Ancient Greece
[edit]
The lives of ancient Greek women were in general little-documented.[35] In a notable exception, in the 500s BC, Sappho of Lesbos wrote extensive poetry regarding her love for other women, fragments of which survive.[36]
Some male-written works reference lesbianism. One example, from the 300s BC, is the tale of the four-legged humans told by Aristophanes in Plato's Symposium[37][b]. Another example, from the 100s CE, is the Dialogues of the Courtesans, where a female character talks about being seduced by two lesbian characters.[38]
In visual culture, historian Nancy Rabinowitz notes that some ancient Greek red vase images portray women in affectionate or erotic scenes.[39]: 27–28 [35]
Ancient Rome
[edit]
In first century sources, accounts of lesbian characters include the story of Iphis and Ianthe, related in the Metamorphoses;[40]: 79-86 a story, related by the fabulist Phaedrus, about Prometheus exchanging the genitals of different men and women;[41] and a satirical figure of a masculine woman who has sex with women, named Philaenis, related in the epigrams of Martial.[42][40]: 98-99
In the ruins of Pompeii, a Roman town destroyed in 79 CE, archaeologists discovered a love poem graffitied onto a wall.[40] The poem is written with feminine declensions for both speaker and addressee, and identified archivally as Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum 4.5296.[43]
A love spell from 3rd or 4th century CE Roman Egypt was written to enchant a woman named Gorgonia to fall in love with a woman named Sophia.[40]: 89–92
Early modern Europe
[edit]
The earliest law against female homosexuality appeared in France in 1270.[34]: 191
In Spain, Italy, and the Holy Roman Empire, sodomy between women was included in acts considered unnatural and punishable by burning to death, although few instances are recorded of this taking place.[6]: 130 The earliest such execution occurred in Speier, Germany, in 1477. Forty days' penance was demanded of nuns who "rode" each other or were discovered to have touched each other's breasts. An Italian nun named Sister Benedetta Carlini was documented to have seduced many of her sisters when possessed by a Divine spirit named "Splenditello"; to end her relationships with other women, she was placed in solitary confinement for the last 40 years of her life.[34]: 190
In England, female homoeroticism was so common in literature and theater that historians suggest it was fashionable for a period during the Renaissance.[44]: 1 Englishwoman Mary Frith has been described as lesbian in academic study.[45]
Ideas about women's sexuality were linked to contemporary understanding of female physiology. The vagina was considered an inward version of the penis; in lesbians, nature was thought to be trying to right itself by prolapsing the vagina to form a penis.[44]: 12 The idea of hermaphroditism became synonymous with female same-sex desire. A longer, engorged clitoris was thought to be used by women to penetrate other women. Penetration was the focus of concern in all sexual acts, and a woman who was thought to have uncontrollable desires because of her engorged clitoris was called a "tribade" (literally, one who rubs).[44]: 14–16 For a while, masturbation and lesbian sex carried the same meaning.[6]: 129
Tribades were simultaneously considered members of the lower class trying to ruin virtuous women, and representatives of an aristocracy corrupt with debauchery. Satirical writers began to suggest that political rivals (or more often, their wives) engaged in tribadism in order to harm their reputations. Queen Anne was rumored to have a passionate relationship with her close advisor Sarah Churchill, Duchess of Marlborough. When Churchill was ousted as the queen's favorite, she purportedly spread allegations of the queen having affairs with her bedchamberwomen.[6]: 137 Marie Antoinette was also the subject of such speculation for some months between 1795 and 1796.[44]: 17–18
1500s-1600s
[edit]Cultural Environment
[edit]
Hermaphroditism appeared in medical literature enough to be considered common knowledge, although cases were rare.
Homoerotic elements in literature were pervasive, specifically the masquerade of one gender for another to fool an unsuspecting woman into being seduced. Such plot devices were used in Shakespeare's Twelfth Night (1601), The Faerie Queene by Edmund Spenser in 1590, and James Shirley's The Bird in a Cage (1633).[44]: 1–11, 22–24
Cases during the Renaissance of women taking on male personae and going undetected for years or decades have been described as transvestism by homosexual women.[46][47] If discovered, punishments ranged from death, to time in the pillory, to being ordered never to dress as a man again.
Some historians view cases of cross-dressing women to be manifestations of women seizing power they would naturally be unable to enjoy in feminine attire, or their way of making sense out of their desire for women. Lillian Faderman argues that Western society was threatened by women who rejected their feminine roles.[48]: 51–54
Notable Relationships
[edit]Henry Fielding wrote a pamphlet titled The Female Husband in 1746, based on the life of Mary Hamilton, who was arrested after marrying a woman while masquerading as a man, and was sentenced to public whipping and six months in jail.[48]: 51–54
Similar examples were procured of Catharine Linck in Prussia in 1717, executed in 1721.[48]: 51–54
Swiss Anne Grandjean married and relocated with her wife to Lyons, but was exposed by a woman with whom she had had a previous affair and sentenced to time in the stocks and prison.[48]: 51–54
In the 1600s, Queen Christina of Sweden had a tendency to dress as a man, abdicated the throne in 1654 to avoid marriage, and was known to pursue romantic relationships with women.[49]: 54–55
Catharine Linck and other women who were accused of using dildos, such as two nuns in 16th century Spain executed for using "material instruments", were punished more severely than those who did not.[34]: 191 [48]: 51–54
Two marriages between women were recorded in Cheshire, England, in 1707 (between Hannah Wright and Anne Gaskill) and 1708 (between Ane Norton and Alice Pickford) with no comment about both parties being female.[44]: 30 [6]: 136
1700s-early 1900s
[edit]
Re-examining romantic friendships
[edit]During the 17th through 19th centuries in the West, a woman expressing passionate love for another woman was fashionable, accepted, and encouraged.[6]: 136 These relationships were termed romantic friendships, Boston marriages, or "sentimental friends".[50] These relationships were documented by large volumes of letters written between women. Any sexual components of the relationships were not publicly discussed. Romantic friendships were promoted as alternatives to and practice for a woman's marriage to a man.[49]: 74–77 [c]
Around the turn of the 20th century, the development of higher education provided opportunities for women. In all-female surroundings, a culture of romantic pursuit was fostered in women's colleges. Older students mentored younger ones, called on them socially, took them to all-women dances, and sent them flowers, cards, and poems that declared their undying love for each other.[49]: 297–313 These were called "smashes" or "spoons", and they were written about quite frankly in stories for girls aspiring to attend college in publications such as Ladies Home Journal, a children's magazine titled St. Nicholas, and a collection called Smith College Stories, without negative views.[51]: 255 Enduring loyalty, devotion, and love were major components to these stories, and sexual acts beyond kissing were consistently undescribed.[49]: 297–313
Faderman calls this period "the last breath of innocence" before 1920 when characterizations of female affection were connected to sexuality, marking lesbians as a unique and often unflatteringly portrayed group.[49]: 297–313 Specifically, Faderman connects the growth of women's independence and their beginning to reject strictly prescribed roles in the Victorian era to the scientific designation of lesbianism as a type of aberrant sexual behavior.[48]: 45–49
Notable relationships
[edit]In 1709, English aristocrat Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, wrote to Anne Wortley: "Nobody was so entirely, so faithfully yours ... I put in your lovers, for I don't allow it possible for a man to be so sincere as I am."[49]: 119
In the 1700s, English poet Anna Seward had a devoted friendship with Honora Sneyd. Sneyd was the subject of many of Seward's poems. When Sneyd married despite Seward's protest, Seward's poems became angry, and she continued to write about Sneyd long after her death.[49]: 132–136
Also in the 1700s, Deborah Sampson fought in the American Revolution under the name Robert Shurtlieff, and pursued relationships with women.[52]
Also in the 1700s, English writer and philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft was attached to a woman named Fanny Blood. Writing to another woman, Wollstonecraft declared, "The roses will bloom when there's peace in the breast, and the prospect of living with my Fanny gladdens my heart:—You know not how I love her."[49]: 139 [d]

The two women had a relationship that was hailed as devoted and virtuous, after eloping and living 51 years together in Wales.
The Irish Eleanor Butler and Sarah Ponsonby were nicknamed the Ladies of Llangollen. Butler and Ponsonby eloped in 1778, to the relief of Ponsonby's family (concerned about their reputation had she run away with a man)[49]: 75 to live together in Wales for 51 years and be thought of as eccentrics.[6]: 227–229 Their story was considered "the epitome of virtuous romantic friendship" and inspired poetry by Anna Seward and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow.[44]: 45–46
In the 1800s, English Diarist Anne Lister, captivated by Butler and Ponsonby, recorded her affairs with women between 1817 and 1840. Some of it was written in code, detailing her sexual relationships with Marianna Belcombe and Maria Barlow.[53]: 390
In the 1800s, Edward De Lacy Evans was born female in Ireland, but took a male name during the voyage to Australia and lived as a man for 23 years in Victoria, marrying three times.[6]: 224
American poet Emily Dickinson (1830-1886) wrote over 300 letters and poems to Susan Gilbert, who later became her sister-in-law, and later engaged in another romantic correspondence with Kate Scott Anthon.[51]: 145–148
American freeborn Black women Addie Brown and Rebecca Primus left evidence of their passion in letters: "No kisses is like youres".[6]: 234 They wrote openly about their sexual affection for one another, and despite their working-class economic status their writings survived, both of which are unusual for the time.
In 1870, American Alice Baldy wrote to Josie Varner, "Do you know that if you touch me, or speak to me there is not a nerve of fibre in my body that does not respond with a thrill of delight?"[6]: 232
In the early 1900s, the unmarried professor Jeannette Augustus Marks at Mount Holyoke College, who lived with the college president, Mary Woolley, for 36 years. Even while unmarried and living with a woman, Marks discouraged young women from "abnormal" friendships and insisted happiness could only be attained with a man.[6]: 239 [e]
In 1909, Percy Redwood created a scandal in New Zealand when she was found to be Amy Bock, who had married a woman from Port Molyneaux; newspapers argued whether it was a sign of insanity or an inherent character flaw.[54]
Lesbians in western culture
[edit]History of sexology (late 1800s-early 1900s)
[edit]In research on "inversion" by German sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld, researchers categorized what was normal sexual behavior for men and women, and therefore to what extent men and women varied from the "perfect male sexual type" and the "perfect female sexual type".[6]: 168 Sexologists Richard von Krafft-Ebing from Germany and Britain's Havelock Ellis wrote some of the earliest and more enduring categorizations of female same-sex attraction, approaching it as a form of insanity.[49]: 241 Krafft-Ebing and Ellis debated whether lesbianism was a lifelong condition or whether women's feelings would change after they had experienced marriage and a "practical life".[49]: 242

Ellis eventually conceded that there were "true inverts" who would spend their lives pursuing erotic relationships with women. These were members of the "third sex" who rejected the roles of women to be subservient, feminine, and domestic.[49]: 240 Invert described the opposite gender roles, and also the related attraction to women instead of men; since women in the Victorian period were considered unable to initiate sexual encounters, women who did so with other women were thought of as possessing masculine sexual desires.[44]: 77
The work of Krafft-Ebing and Ellis was widely read and helped to create public consciousness of female homosexuality.[f] In the absence of any other material to describe their emotions, homosexuals accepted the designation of different or perverted, and used their outlaw status to form social circles in Paris and Berlin. Lesbian began to describe elements of a subculture.[6]: 178–179
Early 1900s Western culture
[edit]
From the 1890s to the 1930s, American heiress Natalie Clifford Barney held a weekly salon in Paris to which major artistic celebrities were invited and where lesbian topics were the focus. Combining Greek influences with contemporary French eroticism, she attempted to create an updated and idealized version of Lesbos in her salon.[56]: 234 Her contemporaries included artist Romaine Brooks, who painted others in her circle; writers Colette, Djuna Barnes, social host Gertrude Stein, and novelist Radclyffe Hall.[citation needed]
Berlin had a vibrant homosexual culture in the 1920s, and about 50 clubs catered to lesbians. Die Freundin (The Girlfriend) magazine, published between 1924 and 1933, targeted lesbians. Garçonne (aka Frauenliebe (Woman Love)) was aimed at lesbians and male transvestites.[6]: 241–244 These publications were controlled by men as owners, publishers, and writers. Around 1926, Selli Engler founded Die BIF – Blätter Idealer Frauenfreundschaften (The BIF – Papers on Ideal Women Friendships), the first lesbian publication owned, published and written by women. In 1928, the lesbian bar and nightclub guide Berlins lesbische Frauen (The Lesbians of Berlin) by Ruth Margarite Röllig[57] further popularized the German capital as a center of lesbian activity. Clubs varied between large establishments that became tourist attractions, to small neighborhood cafes where local women went to meet other women. The cabaret song "Das lila Lied" ("The Lavender Song") became an anthem to the lesbians of Berlin. Although it was sometimes tolerated, homosexuality was illegal in Germany and law enforcement used permitted gatherings as an opportunity to register the names of homosexuals for future reference.[58] Magnus Hirschfeld's Scientific-Humanitarian Committee, which promoted tolerance for homosexuals in Germany, welcomed lesbian participation, and a surge of lesbian-themed writing and political activism in the German feminist movement became evident.[56]: 230–231

In 1928, Radclyffe Hall published the novel The Well of Loneliness. The novel's plot centers around Stephen Gordon, a woman described as an invert. The novel included a foreword by Havelock Ellis and was intended to be a call for tolerance for inverts by publicizing their disadvantages and accidents of being born inverted.[49]: 320 The novel's trial for obscenity was described as "the crystallizing moment in the construction of a visible modern English lesbian subculture" by professor Laura Doan.[59]
Newspaper stories frankly divulged that the book's content includes "sexual relations between Lesbian women", and photographs of Hall often accompanied details about lesbians in most major print outlets within a span of six months.[59] Hall reflected the appearance of a "mannish" woman in the 1920s: short cropped hair, tailored suits (often with pants), and monocle that became widely recognized as a "uniform". When British women supported the war effort during the First World War, they became familiar with masculine clothing, and were considered patriotic for wearing uniforms and pants. Postwar masculinization of women's clothing became associated primarily with lesbianism.[59]

In the United States, the 1920s was a decade of social experimentation, particularly with sex. This was heavily influenced by the writings of Sigmund Freud, who theorized that sexual desire would be sated unconsciously, despite an individual's wish to ignore it.[48]: 63–67 Freud said that while most people have phases of homosexual attraction or experimentation, he attributed exclusive same-sex attraction to stunted development resulting from trauma or parental conflicts.[56]: 242 [g] Freud's theories were much more pervasive in the U.S. than in Europe. With the well-publicized notion that sexual acts were a part of lesbianism and their relationships, sexual experimentation was widespread. Large cities that provided a nightlife were immensely popular, and women began to seek out sexual adventure. Bisexuality became chic, particularly in America's first gay neighborhoods.[48]: 63–67
No location saw more visitors for its possibilities of homosexual nightlife than Harlem, the predominantly African American section of New York City. White "slummers" enjoyed jazz, nightclubs, and anything else they wished. Blues singers Ma Rainey, Bessie Smith, Ethel Waters, and Gladys Bentley sang about affairs with women to visitors such as Tallulah Bankhead, Beatrice Lillie, and the soon-to-be-named Joan Crawford.[48]: 71 [61] Homosexuals began to draw comparisons between their newly recognized minority status and that of African Americans.[48]: 68 Among African American residents of Harlem, lesbian relationships were common and tolerated, though not overtly embraced. Some women staged lavish wedding ceremonies, even filing licenses using masculine names with New York City.[48]: 73 Most homosexual women were married to men and participated in affairs with women regularly.[61]
Across town, Greenwich Village also saw a growing homosexual community; both Harlem and Greenwich Village provided furnished rooms for single men and women, which was a major factor in their development as centers for homosexual communities.[34]: 181 The tenor was different in Greenwich Village than Harlem. Bohemians—intellectuals who rejected Victorian ideals—gathered in the Village. Homosexuals were predominantly male, although figures such as poet Edna St. Vincent Millay and social host Mabel Dodge were known for their affairs with women and promotion of tolerance of homosexuality.[49]: 82–83 Women in the U.S. who could not visit Harlem or live in Greenwich Village for the first time were able to visit saloons in the 1920s without being considered prostitutes. The existence of a public space for women to socialize in bars that were known to cater to lesbians "became the single most important public manifestation of the subculture for many decades", according to historian Lillian Faderman.[48]: 79–80
Great Depression
[edit]The primary component necessary to encourage lesbians to be public and seek other women was economic independence, which virtually disappeared in the 1930s with the Great Depression. Independent women in the 1930s were generally seen as holding jobs that men should have. Most lesbians in the U.S. found it necessary to marry to a "front" such as a gay man where both could pursue homosexual relationships with public discretion, or to a man who expected a traditional wife.[48]: 94–96
The hostile social attitude made very small and close-knit communities in large cities that centered around bars. Women in other locales typically remained isolated. Speaking of homosexuality in any context was socially forbidden, and women rarely discussed lesbianism even amongst themselves; they referred to openly gay people as "in the Life".[48]: 105–112 [h]
Homosexual subculture disappeared in Germany with the rise of the Nazis in 1933.[6]: 191–193
American First Lady from 1933 to 1945, Eleanor Roosevelt, exchanged rings with and wrote letters to journalist Lorena Hickok, expressing her love and desire to kiss Hickock; her writings were in the style of romantic friendship. The view that Roosevelt's relationship with Hickok may have been sexual, therefore deserving of the lesbian label, created controversy among Roosevelt's biographers.[49]: 297–313
World War II
[edit]


The onset of World War II caused a massive upheaval in people's lives as military mobilization engaged millions of men. Women were also accepted into the military in the U.S. Women's Army Corps (WACs) and U.S. Navy's Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service (WAVES). Unlike processes to screen out male homosexuals, which had been in place since the creation of the American military, there were no methods to identify or screen for lesbians; they were put into place gradually during World War II. Despite common attitudes regarding women's traditional roles in the 1930s, independent and masculine women were directly recruited by the military in the 1940s, and frailty discouraged.[63]: 28–33
Some women arrived at the recruiting station in a man's suit, denied ever being in love with another woman, and were easily inducted.[63]: 28–33 Sexual activity was forbidden and blue discharge was almost certain if one identified oneself as a lesbian. As women found each other, they formed into tight groups on base, socialized at service clubs, and began to use code words. Historian Allan Bérubé documented that homosexuals in the armed forces either consciously or subconsciously refused to identify themselves as homosexual or lesbian, and also never spoke about others' orientation.[63]: 104
The most masculine women were not necessarily common, though they were visible, so they tended to attract women interested in finding other lesbians. Women had to broach the subject about their interest in other women carefully, sometimes taking days to develop a common understanding without asking or stating anything outright.[63]: 100
Women who did not enter the military were aggressively called upon to take industrial jobs left by men, in order to continue national productivity. The increased mobility, sophistication, and independence of many women during and after the war made it possible for women to live without husbands, something that would not have been feasible under different economic and social circumstances, further shaping lesbian networks and environments.[48]: 129–130
In Germany, there was no explicit law against lesbianism. During the Holocaust, Jewish and Roma lesbians were imprisoned and killed as Jews or Roma, and politically dissident lesbians were persecuted as political dissidents.[64] Prior to 1939, Aryan lesbians were imprisoned as 'asocials', which was "a broad category applied to all people who evaded Nazi rule."[65] Asocials were identified with an inverted black triangle.[64] In the 1990s in the U.S., some lesbians used the black triangle symbol as an identifier, and the pink triangle was also used for the combined lesbian-gay movement.[65]
Postwar
[edit]
Following World War II, a nationwide movement pressed to return to pre-war society as quickly as possible in the U.S.[66] When combined with the increasing national paranoia about communism and psychoanalytic theory that had become pervasive in medical knowledge, homosexuality became an undesired characteristic of employees working for the U.S. government in 1950. Homosexuals were thought to be vulnerable targets to blackmail, and the government purged its employment ranks of open homosexuals, beginning a widespread effort to gather intelligence about employees' private lives.[56]: 277 State and local governments followed suit, arresting people for congregating in bars and parks, and enacting laws against cross-dressing for men and women.[66]
The U.S. military and government conducted many interrogations, asking if women had ever had sexual relations with another woman and essentially equating even a one-time experience to a criminal identity, thereby severely delineating heterosexuals from homosexuals.[48]: 150–155 In 1952, homosexuality was listed as a pathological emotional disturbance in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.[56]: 247 The view that homosexuality was a curable sickness was widely believed in the medical community, general population, and among many lesbians themselves.[67]
Attitudes and practices to ferret out homosexuals in public service positions extended to Australia[68] and Canada.[69] A section to create an offence of "gross indecency" between females was added to a bill in the United Kingdom House of Commons and passed there in 1921, but was rejected in the House of Lords, apparently because they were concerned any attention paid to sexual misconduct would also promote it.[44]: 109–114
Underground socializing
[edit]Very little information was available about homosexuality beyond medical and psychiatric texts. Community meeting places consisted of bars that were commonly raided by police once a month on average, with those arrested exposed in newspapers. In response, eight women in San Francisco met in their living rooms in 1955 to socialize and have a safe place to dance. When they decided to make it a regular meeting, they became the first organization for lesbians in the U.S., titled the Daughters of Bilitis (DOB). The DOB began publishing a magazine titled The Ladder in 1956. Inside the front cover of every issue was their mission statement, the first of which stated was "Education of the variant". It was intended to provide women with knowledge about homosexuality—specifically relating to women and famous lesbians in history. By 1956, the term "lesbian" had such a negative meaning that the DOB refused to use it as a descriptor, choosing "variant" instead.[70]
The DOB spread to Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles, and The Ladder was mailed to hundreds—eventually thousands—of DOB members discussing the nature of homosexuality, sometimes challenging the idea that it was a sickness, with readers offering their own reasons why they were lesbians and suggesting ways to cope with the condition or society's response to it.[67] British lesbians followed with the publication of Arena Three beginning in 1964, with a similar mission.[44]: 153–158

Butch and femme dichotomy
[edit]As a reflection of categories of sexuality so sharply defined by the government and society at large, early lesbian subculture developed rigid gender roles between women, particularly among the working class in the United States and Canada. For working class lesbians who wanted to live as homosexuals, "A functioning couple ... meant dichotomous individuals, if not male and female, then butch and femme", and the only models they had to go by were "those of the traditional female-male [roles]".[48]: 167–168 Although many municipalities enacted laws against cross-dressing, some women would socialize in bars as butches: dressed in men's clothing and mirroring traditional masculine behavior. Others wore traditionally feminine clothing and assumed the role of femmes. Butch and femme modes of socialization were so integral within lesbian bars that women who refused to choose between the two would be ignored, or at least unable to date anyone, and butch women becoming romantically involved with other butch women or femmes with other femmes was unacceptable.[48]: 167–168
Butch women were not a novelty in the 1950s; even in Harlem and Greenwich Village in the 1920s some women assumed these personae. In the 1950s and 1960s, the roles were pervasive and not limited to North America: from 1940 to 1970, butch/femme bar culture flourished in Britain, though there were fewer class distinctions.[44]: 141–143 They further identified members of a group that had been marginalized; women who had been rejected by most of society had an inside view of an exclusive group of people that took a high amount of knowledge to function in.[48]: 170–174 Butch and femme were considered coarse by American lesbians of higher social standing during this period.[48]: 175–178
Fiction
[edit]Regardless of the lack of information about homosexuality in scholarly texts, another forum for learning about lesbianism was growing. A paperback book titled Women's Barracks describing a woman's experiences in the Free French Forces was published in 1950. It told of a lesbian relationship the author had witnessed. After 4.5 million copies were sold, it was consequently named in the House Select Committee on Current Pornographic Materials in 1952.[71] Its publisher, Gold Medal Books, followed with the novel Spring Fire in 1952, which sold 1.5 million copies. Gold Medal Books was overwhelmed with mail from women writing about the subject matter, and followed with more books, creating the genre of lesbian pulp fiction.[71]
Between 1955 and 1969, over 2,000 books were published using lesbianism as a topic, and they were sold in corner drugstores, train stations, bus stops, and newsstands all over the U.S. and Canada. Literary scholar, Yvonne Keller created several subclasses for lesbian pulp fiction, to help highlight the differences between the types of pulp fiction being released.[72] Virile adventures were written by authors using male pseudonyms, and almost all were marketed to heterosexual men. During this time, another subclass emerged called "Pro-Lesbian". The emergence of pro-lesbian fiction began with authors seeing the voyeuristic and homophobic nature of virile adventures. With only a handful of lesbian pulp fiction authors were women writing for lesbians, including Ann Bannon, Valerie Taylor, Paula Christian, and Vin Packer/Ann Aldrich. These authors deliberately defied the standard of virile adventures by focusing on the relationship between the pair, instead of writing sexually explicit material like virile adventures.[72]
The differences between virile adventures and pro-lesbian covers and titles were distinct enough that Bannon, who also purchased lesbian pulp fiction, later stated that women identified the material iconically by the cover art.[73] Pro-lesbian covers were innocuous and hinted at their lesbian themes, and virile adventures ranged from having one woman partially undressed to sexually explicit covers, to demonstrate the invariably salacious material inside.[72] In addition to this, coded words and images were used on the covers. Instead of "lesbian", terms such as "strange", "twilight", "queer", and "third sex", were used in the titles, and cover art was invariably salacious.[74] Many of the books used cultural references: naming places, terms, describing modes of dress and other codes to isolated women. As a result, pulp fiction helped to proliferate a lesbian identity simultaneously to lesbians and heterosexual readers.[75]
Second-wave feminism / Late 1960s-1980s
[edit]The social rigidity of the 1950s and early 1960s encountered a backlash as social movements to improve the standing of African Americans, the poor, women, and gays all became prominent. The gay rights movement and the feminist movement connected after a violent confrontation occurred in New York City in the 1969 Stonewall riots.[6]: 212–216
From the late 1950s to the 1970s, the sexual revolution took place, and many women took advantage of their new social freedom to try new experiences. Women who previously identified as heterosexual tried sex with women, though many maintained their heterosexual identity.[48]: 203
From the 1960s to the 1980s, the movement of second-wave feminism developed. Lesbianism as a political identity grew to describe a social philosophy among women, often overshadowing sexual desire as a defining trait. Different groups and authors defined "lesbian" as "the rage of all women condensed to the point of explosion".[22]: 70 , "a woman-identified woman who does not fuck men. It does not mean compulsory sexual activity with women."[44]: 177 , or "a woman whose primary erotic, psychological, emotional and social interest is in a member of her own sex[...].".[76]: 7 Women who subscribed to this philosophy dubbed themselves lesbian-feminists. In the ideal society, named Lesbian Nation, "woman" and "lesbian" were interchangeable.[48]: 218–219
Separatist feminists expressed their disdain with an inherently sexist and patriarchal society, and concluded the most effective way to overcome sexism and attain the equality of women would be to deny men any power or pleasure from women. Many believers strove to separate themselves physically and economically from traditional male-centered culture.[48]: 218–219 As equality was a priority for lesbian-feminists, disparity of roles between men and women or butch and femme were viewed as patriarchal. Lesbian-feminists also eschewed the perceived chauvinism of gay men; many lesbian-feminists refused to work with men, or take up their causes.[48]: 210–211
Although lesbian-feminism was a significant shift, not all lesbians agreed with it. Lesbian-feminism was a youth-oriented movement: its members were primarily college educated, with experience in New Left and radical causes, but they had not seen any success in persuading radical organizations to take up women's issues.[22]: 11 Many older lesbians who had acknowledged their sexuality in more conservative times felt maintaining their ways of coping in a homophobic world was more appropriate.[77] Lesbians who believed they were born homosexual, and used the descriptor "lesbian" to define sexual attraction, often considered the separatist opinions of lesbian-feminists to be detrimental to the cause of gay rights.[48]: 217–218
In 1970, the Daughters of Bilitis folded over which direction to focus on: feminism or gay rights issues.[78]
From 1974 to 1993, the organization Salsa Soul Sisters, today known as the African Ancestral Lesbians United for Societal Change, was a lesbian womanist organization operating in New York City.[79]: 55
In October 1980, the First Black Lesbian Conference was held, an outgrowth from the First National Third World Lesbian and Gay Conference.[80][81]
Third-wave feminism / 1980s-2000s
[edit]In the 1980s, a significant movement rejected the desexualization of lesbianism by cultural feminists, causing a heated controversy called the feminist sex wars.[48]: 246–252 Butch and femme roles returned, although not as strictly followed as they were in the 1950s. They became a mode of chosen sexual self-expression for some women in the 1990s. Once again, women felt safer claiming to be more sexually adventurous, and sexual flexibility became more accepted.[82]
In 1997, Marxist political activist Angela Davis came out a lesbian in an interview with Out magazine.[83]
Lesbians of color
[edit]
"Lesbians of color" is an umbrella term for Black, Latina, Asian, Arab, Native American, and other non-white lesbians. Lesbians of color have often been a marginalized group,[84] and experienced racism in addition to homophobia and misogyny.[85][page needed]
Some scholars have noted that in the past the predominant lesbian community was largely composed of white women and influenced by American culture, leading some lesbians of color to experience difficulties integrating into the community at large. Many lesbians of color have stated that they were often systematically excluded from lesbian spaces based on the fact that they are women of color.[86] Additionally, lesbians of color face unique sets of challenges within their respective racial communities. Many feel abandoned, as communities of color often view homosexual identity as a "white" lifestyle and see the acceptance of homosexuality as a setback in achieving equality.[85][page needed]
Lesbians of color, especially those of immigrant populations, often hold the sentiment that their sexual orientation identity adversely affects assimilation into the dominant culture. Historically, women of color were often excluded or culturally marginalized from participating in white-dominated lesbian and gay movements. The early lesbian feminist movement was criticized for excluding race and class issues from their spaces and for a lack of focus on issues that did not benefit white women.[84] Audre Lorde, Barbara Smith, and Cherrie Moraga are cited as major theorists within the various lesbians of color movements for their insistence on inclusion and equality, from both racial communities and white lesbian communities.[84]
The many intersections surrounding lesbians of color can often contribute to an increased need for mental health resources. Lesbians of color are more likely to experience a number of psychological issues due to the various experiences of sexism, racism, and homophobia.[87] Mental health providers often use heteronormative standards to gauge the health of lesbian relationships, and the relationships of lesbian women of color are often subjects of judgment because they are seen as the most deviant.[87]
Within racial communities, the decision to come out can be costly, as the threat of loss of support from family, friends, and the community at large is probable. Lesbians of color are often exposed to a range of adverse consequences, including microaggression, discrimination, menace, and violence.[86]
Outside western culture
[edit]Middle East
[edit]Arabic-language historical records have used various terms to describe sexual practices between women.[88] A common one is "sahq", which refers to rubbing. Lesbian practices and identities are largely absent from the historical record. The common term to describe lesbianism in Arabic today is essentially the same term used to describe men, and thus the distinction between male and female homosexuality is to a certain extent linguistically obscured in contemporary queer discourse.[88] Overall, the study of contemporary lesbian experience in the region is complicated by power dynamics in the postcolonial context, shaped even by what some scholars refer to as "homonationalism", the use of politicized understanding of sexual categories to advance specific national interests on the domestic and international stage.[89]
Women in the Middle East have been historically segregated from men. In the 7th and 8th centuries, some extraordinary women dressed in male attire when gender roles were less strict. The Caliphal court in Baghdad featured women who dressed as men, including false facial hair, but they competed with other women for the attentions of men.[90][88]
In the ninth century, the Muslim philosopher al-Kindi, who was born and educated in modern-day Iraq, explicitly discusses lesbianism: "Lesbianism is due to a vapor which, condensed, generates in the labia heat and an itch which only dissolve and become cold through friction and orgasm. When friction and orgasm take place, the heat turns into coldness because the liquid that a woman ejaculates in lesbian intercourse is cold whereas..."[91]
In the tenth century, the erotic writings Jawami ` al-ladhdha (Encyclopedia of Pleasure), by Abul Hasan Ali ibn Nasr al-Katib, was written also in modern-day Iraq. It describes a committed relationship between a Christian woman and an Arab woman in pre-Islamic Iraq, and the mourning process one went through when the other died.[91]
According to the 12th-century writings of Sharif al-Idrisi, highly intelligent women were more likely to be lesbians; their intellectual prowess put them on a more even par with men.[90]
While male-written accounts of lesbianism in the Middle East exist, a 1978 treatise about repression in Iran asserted that women were completely silenced: "In the whole of Iranian history, [no woman] has been allowed to speak out for such tendencies ... To attest to lesbian desires would be an unforgivable crime."[90] Although the authors of the treatise argued this did not mean women could not engage in lesbian relationships, a lesbian anthropologist in 1991 visited Yemen and reported that women in the town she visited were unable to comprehend her romantic relationship to another woman. Women in Pakistan are expected to marry men; those who do not are ostracized. Women may have intimate relations with other women as long as their wifely duties are met, their private matters are kept quiet, and the woman with whom they are involved is somehow related by family or logical interest to her lover.[90]

Individuals identifying with or otherwise engaging in lesbian practices in the region can face family violence and societal persecution, including "honor killings". The justifications provided by murderers relate to a person's perceived sexual immorality, loss of virginity (outside of acceptable frames of marriage), and target female victims primarily.[92]
Lesbians also face government persecution in the Middle East. In Yemen, homosexuality is criminalized, and women can face lashings, up to three years in prison or the death penalty for consensual lesbian sex.[93][94] In 2017, the Egyptian government arrested and tortured out lesbian and activist Sarah Hegazi after she flew a rainbow flag at a concert.[95]
Americas
[edit]Both male and female homosexuality were known in Aztec culture. Although both were generally disapproved of, there is no evidence that homosexuality was actively suppressed until after the Spanish Conquest.[96] Female homosexuality is described in the Florentine Codex, a 16th-century study of the Aztec world written by the Spanish Franciscan friar Bernardino de Sahagún. It describes Aztec lesbians as masculine in appearance and behavior and never wishing to be married.[96] The book Monarquía indiana by Fray Juan de Torquemada, published in 1615, briefly mentions the persecution of Aztec lesbians: "The woman, who with another woman had carnal pleasures, for which they were called Patlache, which means: female incubus, they both died for it."[96][i]
In Latin America, lesbian subcultures increased as several countries transitioned to or reformed democratic governments. However, social harassment has been common even in places where homosexuality is legal. Laws against child corruption, morality, or "the good ways" (faltas a la moral o las buenas costumbres) have been used to persecute homosexuals.[97] Lesbian groups and advocacy have faced repression in many countries where dictators have seized power, including Argentina.[97]
Argentinian lesbian group Nuestro Mundo (NM) was created in 1969.[97]
Mexican lesbian group Lesbos was founded in 1977. In 1997, 13 lesbian organizations were active in Mexico City.[97]
In Chile, the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet forbade the creation of lesbian groups until 1984. The first lesbian group Ayuquelén ("joy of being" in Mapuche) was first founded in 1984, prompted by the very public homophobic murder of a woman. Ayuquelén worked to remove the sodomy laws then in place in Chile.[97]
In Nicaragua in 1986, the Sandinista National Liberation Front expelled gay men and lesbians from its midst. State persecution prevented the formation of associations until AIDS became a concern, when educational efforts forced sexual minorities to band together. The first lesbian organization was Nosotras, founded in 1989. An effort to promote visibility from 1991 to 1992 provoked the government to declare homosexuality illegal in 1994, effectively ending the movement until 2004, when Grupo Safo – Grupo de Mujeres Lesbianas de Nicaragua was created, four years before homosexuality became legal again.[97]
Some Indigenous peoples of the Americas conceptualize a third gender for women who dress as, and fulfill the roles usually filled by, men in their cultures.[98][99] In other cases they may see gender as a spectrum, and use different terms for feminine women and masculine women.[100] These identities are rooted in the context of the ceremonial and cultural lives of the particular Indigenous cultures, and "simply being gay and Indian does not make someone a Two-Spirit."[101] These ceremonial and social roles, which are conferred and confirmed by the person's elders, "do not make sense" when defined by non-Native concepts of sexual orientation and gender identity.[99] Rather, they must be understood in an Indigenous context, as traditional spiritual and social roles held by the person in their Indigenous community.[101][99][102]
Africa
[edit]Founded in 2004 in Namibia, the Coalition of African Lesbians is a pan-Africanist, radical feminist network of fourteen nonprofits across ten African countries, working to eradicate stigma, legal discrimination, and violence against lesbians.[103]
Cross-gender roles and marriage between women has also been recorded in over 30 traditional African societies.[6]: 262 Women may marry other women, raise their children, and be generally thought of as men in societies in Nigeria, Cameroon, and Kenya. The Hausa people of Sudan have a term equivalent to lesbian, kifi, that may also be applied to males to mean "neither party insists on a particular sexual role".[6]: 259
Near the Congo River, a female who participates in strong emotional or sexual relationships with another female among the Nkundo people is known as yaikya bonsángo (a woman who presses against another woman). Lesbian relationships are also known in matrilineal societies in Ghana among the Akan people. In Lesotho, females engage in what is commonly considered sexual behavior to the Western world: they kiss, sleep together, rub genitals, participate in cunnilingus, and maintain their relationships with other females vigilantly. Since the people of Lesotho believe sex requires a penis, they do not consider their behavior sexual, nor label themselves lesbians.[6]: 237–238
In Tanzania, lesbians are known as or called "Msagaji" (singular), "Wasagaji" (plural), which in Swahili means grinder or grinding because of the perceived nature of lesbian sex that would involve the mutual rubbing of vulvas.[104]
Corrective rape is reported to be on the rise in South Africa.[105] The crime is sometimes supervised by members of the woman's family or local community,[106] and is a major contributor to HIV infection in South African lesbians.[105] "Corrective rape" is not recognized by the South African legal system as a hate crime despite the fact that the South African Constitution states that no person shall be discriminated against based on their social status and identity, including sexual orientation.[107][108][109] Legally, South Africa protects gay rights extensively, but the government has not taken proactive action to prevent corrective rape, and women do not have much faith in the police and their investigations.[110][111] Local South African organizations including nonprofit "Luleki Sizwe" and The Triangle Project, between 500 (per Triangle Project) and 3600 (Luleki Sizwe) South Africans suffer from corrective rape every year,[112][110] the vast majority of lesbians live in fear of corrective rape, and victims are less likely to report the crime because of their society's homophobia.[110]
Asia
[edit]
China before westernization was another society that segregated men from women. Historical Chinese culture has not recognized a concept of sexual orientation, or a framework to divide people based on their same-sex or opposite-sex attractions.[113]: 29 Although there was a significant culture surrounding homosexual men, there was none for women. Outside their duties to bear sons to their husbands, women were perceived as having no sexuality at all.[6]: 311
This did not mean that women could not pursue sexual relationships with other women, but that such associations could not impose upon women's relationships to men. Rare references to lesbianism were written by Ying Shao, who identified same-sex relationships between women in imperial courts who behaved as husband and wife as dui shi (paired eating). "Golden Orchid Associations" in Southern China existed into the 20th century and promoted formal marriages between women, who were then allowed to adopt children.[34]: 187 Westernization brought new ideas that all sexual behavior not resulting in reproduction was aberrant.[113]: 30–31
The liberty of being employed in silk factories starting in 1865 allowed some women to style themselves tzu-shu nii (never to marry) and live in communes with other women. Other Chinese called them sou-hei (self-combers) for adopting hairstyles of married women. These communes passed because of the Great Depression and were subsequently discouraged by the communist government for being a relic of feudal China.[34]: 195 In contemporary Chinese society, tongzhi (same goal or spirit) is the term used to refer to homosexuals; most Chinese are reluctant to divide this classification further to identify lesbians.[113]: 28
In Japan, the term rezubian, a Japanese pronunciation of "lesbian", was used during the 1920s. Westernization brought more independence for women and allowed some Japanese women to wear pants.[6]: 246 The cognate tomboy is used in the Philippines, and particularly in Manila, to denote women who are more masculine.[113]: 122 Virtuous women in Korea prioritize motherhood, chastity, and virginity; outside this scope, very few women are free to express themselves through sexuality, although there is a growing organization for lesbians named Kkirikkiri.[113]: 75 The term pondan is used in Malaysia to refer to gay men, but since there is no historical context to reference lesbians, the term is used for female homosexuals as well.[113]: 145 As in many Asian countries, open homosexuality is discouraged in many social levels, so many Malaysians lead double lives.[113]: 148–150
In India, a 14th-century Indian text mentioning a lesbian couple who had a child as a result of their lovemaking is an exception to the general silence about female homosexuality. According to Ruth Vanita, this invisibility disappeared with the release of a film titled Fire in 1996, prompting some theaters in India to be attacked by religious extremists. Terms used to label homosexuals are often rejected by Indian activists for being the result of imperialist influence, but most discourse on homosexuality centers on men. Women's rights groups in India continue to debate the legitimacy of including lesbian issues in their platforms, as lesbians and material focusing on female homosexuality are frequently suppressed.[114]
Demographics
[edit]Kinsey Report
[edit]
The most extensive early study of female homosexuality was provided by the Institute for Sex Research, who published an in-depth report of the sexual experiences of American women in 1953. More than 8,000 women were interviewed by Alfred Kinsey and the staff of the Institute for Sex Research for Kinsey Reports. The reports' methodology was criticized during and after its publication.[115][116][117] However, the reports were unexpectedly popular. They reported that 28% of women had been aroused by another female, and 19% had a sexual contact with another female.[118]: 453 [j], and that around nine percent of the women had orgasmed.[118]: 453–454 The report's dispassionate discussion of homosexuality as a form of human sexual behavior was revolutionary. Up to this study, only physicians and psychiatrists studied sexual behavior, and almost always the results were interpreted with a moral view.[117]
Hite Report
[edit]In 1976, sexologist Shere Hite published a report on the sexual encounters of 3,019 women who had responded to questionnaires, under the title The Hite Report. Hite's questions differed from Kinsey's, focusing more on how women identified, or what they preferred rather than experience. Respondents to Hite's questions indicated that 8% preferred sex with women and 9% answered that they identified as bisexual or had sexual experiences with men and women, though they refused to indicate preference.[119]
Hite's conclusions are more based on respondents' comments than quantifiable data. She found it "striking" that many women who had no lesbian experiences indicated they were interested in sex with women, particularly because the question was not asked.[119] Hite found the two most significant differences between respondents' experience with men and women were the focus on clitoral stimulation, and more emotional involvement and orgasmic responses.[119]
Population estimates
[edit]Lesbians in the U.S. are estimated to be about 2.6% of the population, according to a National Opinion Research Center survey of sexually active adults who had had same-sex experiences within the past year, completed in 2000.[120] A survey of same-sex couples in the United States showed that between 2000 and 2005, the number of people claiming to be in same-sex relationships increased by 30%—five times the rate of population growth in the U.S. The study attributed the jump to people being more comfortable self-identifying as homosexual to the federal government.[k]
The government of the United Kingdom does not ask citizens to define their sexuality. A survey by the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) in 2010 found that 1.5% of Britons identified themselves as gay or bisexual, and the ONS suggests that this is in line with other surveys showing the number between 0.3% and 3%.[122][123] Estimates of lesbians are sometimes not differentiated in studies of same-sex households, such as those performed by the U.S. census, and estimates of total gay, lesbian, or bisexual population by the UK government. Polls in Australia recorded a range of self-identified lesbian or bisexual women from 1.3% to 2.2% of the total population.[124]
Health
[edit]Physical
[edit]Medical research and care sometimes use the term women who have sex with women (WSW) instead of lesbian.[125]
In a 2006 American survey of 2,345 lesbian and bisexual women, only 9.3% had ever been asked their sexual orientation by a physician. A third of the women had received a negative reaction from a medical professional after identifying themselves as lesbian or bisexual.[126]
When women do seek medical attention, medical professionals often fail to take a complete medical history. A patient's complete history helps medical professionals identify higher risk areas. In a 1995 U.S. survey of 6,935 self-identified lesbians, 77% had had one or more lifetime male sexual partners, and 6% had that contact within the previous year.[127][l]
Cancer
[edit]The risk factors for developing ovarian cancer rates are higher in lesbians than heterosexual women, perhaps because many lesbians lack the protective factors of pregnancy, abortion, contraceptives, breast feeding, and miscarriages.[128]
Many lesbians neglect to see a physician because they do not participate in heterosexual activity and require no birth control, which is the initiating factor for most women to seek consultation with a gynecologist when they become sexually active.[129]: 359 As a result, many lesbians are not screened for cancer regularly with Pap smears.[130]
Lifestyle factors
[edit]Factors that add to risk of heart disease include obesity and smoking, both of which are more prevalent among lesbians. Studies show that lesbians are generally less concerned about weight issues than heterosexual women; and lesbians consider women with higher body masses to be more attractive than heterosexual women do. Research is needed to determine specific causes of obesity and smoking in lesbians.[130][126]
Lesbians are more likely to exercise regularly than heterosexual women. Lesbians, unlike heterosexual women, do not generally exercise for aesthetic reasons.[131]
Sexual health
[edit]Some sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are communicable between women, including human papillomavirus (HPV), trichomoniasis, syphilis, and herpes simplex virus (HSV). Transmission of specific STIs among women who have sex with women depends on the sexual practices women engage in. Any object that comes in contact with cervical secretions, vaginal mucosa, or menstrual blood, including fingers or penetrative objects may transmit STIs.[132] Orogenital contact may indicate a higher risk of acquiring HSV,[133] even among women who have had no sex with men.[125]
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) occurs more often in lesbians, but it is unclear if BV is transmitted by sexual contact; it occurs in celibate as well as sexually active women. BV often occurs in both partners in a lesbian relationship;[134] a recent study of women with BV found that 81% had partners with BV.[125]
Lesbians do not frequently transmit human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), although transmission is possible through vaginal and cervical secretions. The highest rate of transmission of HIV to lesbians is from intravenous drug use or sex with women who have sexual intercourse with bisexual men.[129][135]
Mental
[edit]Much literature on mental health and lesbians centered on their depression, substance abuse, and suicide. Although these issues exist among lesbians, discussion about their causes shifted after homosexuality was removed from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual in 1973. Instead, social ostracism, legal discrimination, internalization of negative stereotypes, and limited support structures indicate factors homosexuals face in Western societies that often adversely affect their mental health.[136]
Lesbian women report feeling significantly different and isolated during adolescence.[136][22]: 153 These emotions have been cited as appearing on average at 15 years old in lesbians and 18 years old in bisexual women.[137]
More than half the respondents to a 1994 survey of health issues in lesbians reported they had suicidal thoughts, and 18% had attempted suicide.[5]: 70 [needs update] American studies in the 2010s and 2020s have found that LGBT people experience higher rates of mental distress, and that this relationship is mediated by experiences of rejection and adverse childhood experiences.[138]
Depression is reported among lesbians at a rate similar to heterosexual women.[5]: 69 Depression is a more significant problem among women who feel they must hide their sexual orientation from friends and family, or experience compounded ethnic or religious discrimination, or endure relationship difficulties with no support system.[22]: 157–158
Generalized anxiety disorder is more likely to appear among lesbian and bisexual women than heterosexual women.[136][m]
Studies have shown that heterosexual men and lesbians have different standards for what they consider attractive in women. Lesbians who view themselves with male standards of female beauty may experience lower self-esteem, eating disorders, and higher incidence of depression.[131]
A population-based study completed by the National Alcohol Research Center found that women who identify as lesbian or bisexual are less likely to abstain from alcohol. Lesbians and bisexual women have a higher likelihood of reporting problems with alcohol, as well as not being satisfied with treatment for substance abuse programs.[140][non-primary source needed] Many lesbian communities are centered in bars, and drinking is an activity that correlates to community participation for lesbians and bisexual women.[5]: 81
Media representation
[edit]Lesbians portrayed in literature, film, and television often shape contemporary thought about women's sexuality. The majority of media about lesbians is produced by men;[22]: 389–390 women's publishing companies did not develop until the 1970s, films about lesbians made by women did not appear until the 1980s, and television shows portraying lesbians written by women only began to be created in the 21st century. As a result, homosexuality—particularly dealing with women—has been excluded because of symbolic annihilation. When depictions of lesbians began to surface, they were often one-dimensional, simplified stereotypes.[22]: 389–390
Literature
[edit]Ancient lesbian writers include Sappho.[n] Ancient stories interpreted as examples of lesbianism include the Book of Ruth,[51]: 22–23 [53]: 108 Camilla and Diana, Artemis and Callisto, and Iphis and Ianthe.[51]: 24–27
Greek stories of the heavens often included a female figure whose virtue and virginity were unspoiled, who pursued more masculine interests, and who was followed by a dedicated group of maidens.[citation needed]
For ten centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire, lesbianism disappeared from literature.[53]: 11 Foster points to the particularly strict view that Eve—representative of all women—caused the downfall of mankind; original sin among women was a particular concern, especially because women were perceived as creating life.[51]: 30–31 During this time, women were largely illiterate and not encouraged to engage in intellectual pursuit, and men shaped ideas about sexuality.[53]: 6
In the 15th and 16th centuries, French and English depictions of relationships between women, writers' attitudes spanned from amused tolerance to arousal, whereupon a male character would participate to complete the act. Physical relationships between women were often encouraged; men felt no threat as they viewed sexual acts between women to be accepted when men were not available, and not comparable to fulfillment that could be achieved by sexual acts between men and women.[49]: 26–28 At worst, if a woman became enamored of another woman, she became a tragic figure. Physical and therefore emotional satisfaction was considered impossible without a natural phallus. Male intervention into relationships between women was necessary only when women acted as men and demanded the same social privileges.[49]: 29
In the 17th and 18th centuries, writings mentioning lesbianism included the Lives of Gallant Ladies by Brantôme in 1665, John Cleland's 1749 erotica Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure, and L'Espion Anglais by various authors in 1778.[citation needed]

Lesbianism became almost exclusive to French literature in the 19th century, based on male fantasy and the desire to shock bourgeois moral values.[49]: 264, 268 Honoré de Balzac, in The Girl with the Golden Eyes (1835), employed lesbianism in his story about three people living amongst the moral degeneration of Paris, and again in Cousin Bette and Séraphîta. His work influenced novelist Théophile Gautier's Mademoiselle de Maupin, which provided the first description of a physical type that became associated with lesbians: tall, wide-shouldered, slim-hipped, and athletically inclined.[51]: 51–65 Charles Baudelaire repeatedly used lesbianism as a theme in his poems "Lesbos", "Femmes damnées 1" ("Damned Women"), and "Femmes damnées 2".[53]: 435
Reflecting French society, as well as employing stock character associations, many of the lesbian characters in 19th-century French literature were prostitutes or courtesans: personifications of vice who died early, violent deaths in moral endings.[49]: 281–283 Samuel Taylor Coleridge's 1816 poem "Christabel" and the novella Carmilla (1872) by Sheridan Le Fanu both present lesbianism associated with vampirism.[49]: 277, 288–289 Portrayals of female homosexuality not only formed European consciousness about lesbianism, but Krafft-Ebing cited the characters in Gustave Flaubert's Salammbô (1862) and Ernest Feydeau's La comtesse de Chalis (1867) as examples of lesbians because both novels feature female protagonists who do not adhere to social norms and express "contrary sexual feeling", although neither participated in same-sex desire or sexual behavior.[51]: 72 Havelock Ellis used literary examples from Balzac and several French poets and writers to develop his framework to identify sexual inversion in women.[49]: 254
Gradually, women began to author their own thoughts and literary works about lesbian relationships. Until the publication of The Well of Loneliness, most major works involving lesbianism were penned by men. Foster suggests that women would have encountered suspicion about their own lives had they used same-sex love as a topic, and that some writers including Louise Labé, Charlotte Charke, and Margaret Fuller either changed the pronouns in their literary works to male, or made them ambiguous.[51]: 116–127 Author George Sand was portrayed as a character in several works in the 19th century; writer Mario Praz credited the popularity of lesbianism as a theme to Sand's appearance in Paris society in the 1830s.[49]: 263 [o]
In the 20th century, Katherine Mansfield, Amy Lowell, Gertrude Stein, H.D., Vita Sackville-West, Virginia Woolf, and Gale Wilhelm wrote popular works that had same-sex relationships as themes. Some women, such as Marguerite Yourcenar and Mary Renault, wrote or translated works of fiction that focused on homosexual men, like some of the writings of Carson McCullers. All three were involved in same-sex relationships, but their primary friendships were with gay men.[34]: 182 Foster further asserts 1928 was a "peak year" for lesbian-themed literature; in addition to The Well of Loneliness, three other novels with lesbian themes were published in England: Elizabeth Bowen's The Hotel, Woolf's Orlando, and Compton Mackenzie's satirical novel Extraordinary Women.[141] Unlike The Well of Loneliness, none of these novels were banned.[51]: 281–287 [p]
As the paperback book came into fashion, lesbian themes were relegated to pulp fiction. Many of the pulp novels typically presented very unhappy women, or relationships that ended tragically. Marijane Meaker later wrote that she was told to make the relationship end badly in Spring Fire because the publishers were concerned about the books being confiscated by the U.S. Postal Service.[144] Patricia Highsmith, writing as Claire Morgan, wrote The Price of Salt in 1951 and refused to follow this directive, but instead used a pseudonym.[53]: 1024–1025
Following the Stonewall riots, lesbian themes in literature became much more diverse and complex, and shifted the focus of lesbianism from erotica for heterosexual men to works written by and for lesbians. Feminist magazines such as The Furies, and Sinister Wisdom replaced The Ladder.[citation needed]
Well-known fiction writers who used lesbian characters and plots included Rita Mae Brown's Rubyfruit Jungle (1973) and the works of Dorothy Allison.[22]: 377-379 Audre Lorde became a well-known poet and essayist, and Cherríe Moraga wrote and edited extensive nonfiction.[22]: 379
Film
[edit]Lesbianism, or the suggestion of it, began early in filmmaking. The same constructs of how lesbians were portrayed—or for what reasons—as what had appeared in literature were placed on women in the films. Women challenging their feminine roles was a device more easily accepted than men challenging masculine ones. Actresses appeared as men in male roles because of plot devices as early as 1914 in A Florida Enchantment featuring Edith Storey. In Morocco (1930) Marlene Dietrich kisses another woman on the lips, and Katharine Hepburn plays a man in Christopher Strong in 1933 and again in Sylvia Scarlett (1936). Hollywood films followed the same trend set by audiences who flocked to Harlem to see edgy shows that suggested bisexuality.[145]: 27–28
Overt female homosexuality was introduced in 1929's Pandora's Box between Louise Brooks and Alice Roberts. After the Hays Code in 1930, most references to homosexuality in films were censored under the umbrella term "sex perversion". German films depicted homosexuality and were distributed throughout Europe, but 1931's Mädchen in Uniform was not distributed in the U.S. because of the depiction of an adolescent's love for a female teacher in boarding school.[146]: 58

Because of the Hays Code, lesbianism after 1930 was absent from most films, even those adapted with overt lesbian characters or plot devices. Lillian Hellman's play The Children's Hour was converted into a heterosexual love triangle and retitled These Three. Biopic Queen Christina in 1933, starring Greta Garbo, veiled most of the speculation about Christina of Sweden's affairs with women.[146]: 58 Homosexuality or lesbianism was never mentioned outright in the films while the Hays Code was enforced. The reason censors stated for removing a lesbian scene in 1954's The Pit of Loneliness was that it was, "Immoral, would tend to corrupt morals".[146]: 102 The code was relaxed somewhat after 1961, and the next year William Wyler remade The Children's Hour with Audrey Hepburn and Shirley MacLaine. After MacLaine's character admits her love for Hepburn's, she hangs herself; this set a precedent for miserable endings in films addressing homosexuality.[146]: 139
Gay characters also were often killed off at the end, such as the death of Sandy Dennis' character at the end of The Fox in 1968. If not victims, lesbians were depicted as villains or morally corrupt, such as portrayals of brothel madames by Barbara Stanwyck in Walk on the Wild Side from 1962 and Shelley Winters in The Balcony in 1963. Lesbians as predators were presented in Rebecca (1940), women's prison films like Caged (1950), or in the character Rosa Klebb in From Russia with Love (1963).[146]: 143–156 Lesbian vampire themes have reappeared in Dracula's Daughter (1936), Blood and Roses (1960), Vampyros Lesbos (1971), and The Hunger (1983).[146]: 49 Basic Instinct (1992) featured a bisexual murderer played by Sharon Stone; it was one of several films that set off a storm of protests about the depiction of gay people as predators.[145]: 150–151
The first film to address lesbianism with significant depth was The Killing of Sister George in 1968, which was filmed in The Gateways Club, a longstanding lesbian pub in London. It is the first to claim a film character who identifies as a lesbian, and film historian Vito Russo considers the film a complex treatment of a multifaceted character who is forced into silence about her openness by other lesbians.[146]: 170–173 Personal Best in 1982, and Lianna in 1983 treat the lesbian relationships more sympathetically and show lesbian sex scenes, though in neither film are the relationships happy ones. Personal Best was criticized for engaging in the clichéd plot device of one woman returning to a relationship with a man, implying that lesbianism is a phase, as well as treating the lesbian relationship with "undisguised voyeurism".[145]: 185–186 More ambiguous portrayals of lesbian characters were seen in Silkwood (1983), The Color Purple (1985), and Fried Green Tomatoes (1991), despite explicit lesbianism in the source material.[147]
An era of independent filmmaking brought different stories, writers, and directors to films. Desert Hearts arrived in 1985, to be one of the most successful. Directed by lesbian Donna Deitch, it is loosely based on Jane Rule's novel Desert of the Heart. It received mixed critical commentary, but earned positive reviews from the gay press.[145]: 194–195 The late 1980s and early 1990s ushered in a series of films treating gay and lesbian issues seriously, made by gays and lesbians, nicknamed New Queer Cinema.[145]: 237 Films using lesbians as a subject included Rose Troche's avant garde romantic comedy Go Fish (1994) and the first film about African American lesbians, Cheryl Dunye's The Watermelon Woman, in 1995.[145]: 241–242
Realism in films depicting lesbians developed further to include romance stories such as The Incredibly True Adventure of Two Girls in Love and When Night Is Falling, both in 1995, Better Than Chocolate (1999), and the social satire But I'm a Cheerleader (also in 1999).[145]: 270 A twist on the lesbian-as-predator theme was the added complexity of motivations of some lesbian characters in Peter Jackson's Heavenly Creatures (1994), the Oscar-winning biopic of Aileen Wuornos, Monster (2003), and the exploration of fluid sexuality and gender in Chasing Amy (1997), Kissing Jessica Stein (2001), and Boys Don't Cry (1999).[145]: 274–280 The film V for Vendetta shows a dictatorship in future Britain that forces lesbians, homosexuals, and other "unwanted" people in society to be systematically slaughtered in Nazi concentration camps. In the film, a lesbian actress named Valerie, who was killed in such a manner, serves as inspiration for the masked rebel V and his ally Evey Hammond, who set out to overthrow the dictatorship.[citation needed]
Theatre
[edit]The first stage production to feature a lesbian kiss and open depiction of two women in love is the 1907 Yiddish play God of Vengeance (Got fun nekome) by Sholem Asch. Rivkele, a young woman, and Manke, a prostitute in her father's brothel, fall in love. On March 6, 1923, during a performance of the play in a New York City theatre, producers and cast were informed that they had been indicted by a Grand Jury for violating the Penal Code that defined the presentation of "an obscene, indecent, immoral and impure theatrical production." They were arrested the following day when they appeared before a judge. Two months later, they were found guilty in a jury trial. The producers were fined $200 and the cast received suspended sentences. The play is considered by some to be "the greatest drama of the Yiddish theater".[148][149] God of Vengeance was the inspiration for the 2015 play Indecent by Paula Vogel, which features lesbian characters Rifkele and Manke.[150][151] Indecent was nominated for the 2017 Tony Award for Best Play and Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Play.[citation needed]
Broadway musical The Prom featured lesbian characters Emma Nolan and Alyssa Greene. In 2019, the production was nominated for six Tony Awards, including Best Musical, and received the Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Musical. A performance from The Prom was included in the 2018 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade and made history by showing the first same-sex kiss in the parade's broadcast.[152][153] Jagged Little Pill featured lesbian character Jo, who is dealing with her religious mother's disapproval.[154]
Television
[edit]Television began to address homosexuality much later than film. Local talk shows in the late 1950s first addressed homosexuality by inviting panels of experts (usually not gay themselves) to discuss the problems of gay men in society. Lesbianism was rarely included. The first time a lesbian was portrayed on network television was the NBC drama The Eleventh Hour in the early 1960s, in a teleplay about an actress who feels she is persecuted by her female director, and in distress, calls a psychiatrist who explains she is a latent lesbian who has deep-rooted guilt about her feelings for women. When she realizes this, she is able to pursue heterosexual relationships, which are portrayed as "healthy".[155]: 7–9
Invisibility for lesbians continued in the 1970s when homosexuality became the subject of dramatic portrayals, first with medical dramas (The Bold Ones, Marcus Welby, M.D., Medical Center) featuring primarily male patients coming out to doctors, or staff members coming out to other staff members. These shows allowed homosexuality to be discussed clinically, with the main characters guiding troubled gay characters or correcting homophobic antagonists, while simultaneously comparing homosexuality to psychosis, criminal behavior, or drug use.[155]: 13–44
Another stock plot device in the 1970s was the gay character in a police drama. They served as victims of blackmail or anti-gay violence, but more often as criminals. Beginning in the late 1960s with N.Y.P.D., Police Story, and Police Woman, the use of homosexuals in stories became much more prevalent, according to Vito Russo, as a response to their higher profiles in gay activism.[146]: 186–189 Lesbians were included as villains, motivated to murder by their desires, internalized homophobia, or fear of being exposed as homosexual. One episode of Police Woman earned protests by the National Gay Task Force before it aired for portraying a trio of murderous lesbians who killed retirement home patients for their money.[155]: 68 NBC edited the episode because of the protests, but a sit-in was staged in the head of NBC's offices.[155]: 69
In the middle of the 1970s, gay men and lesbians began to appear as police officers or detectives facing coming out issues. This did not extend to CBS' groundbreaking show Cagney & Lacey in 1982, starring two female police detectives. CBS production made conscious attempts to soften the characters so they would not appear to be lesbians.[155]: 75–76 In 1991, a bisexual lawyer portrayed by Amanda Donohoe on L.A. Law shared the first significant lesbian kiss[q] on primetime television with Michele Greene, stirring a controversy despite being labeled "chaste" by The Hollywood Reporter.[155]: 89

Though television did not begin to use recurring homosexual characters until the late 1980s, some early situation comedies used a stock character that author Stephen Tropiano calls "gay-straight": supporting characters who were quirky, did not comply with gender norms, or had ambiguous personal lives, that "for all purposes should be gay". These included Zelda from The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis, Miss Hathaway from The Beverly Hillbillies, and Jo from The Facts of Life.[155]: 185–186 In the mid-1980s through the 1990s, sitcoms frequently employed a "coming out" episode, where a friend of one of the stars admits she is a lesbian, forcing the cast to deal with the issue. Designing Women, The Golden Girls, and Friends used this device with women in particular.[155]: 202–204
Recurring lesbian characters who came out were seen on Married... with Children, Mad About You, and Roseanne, in which a highly publicized episode had ABC executives afraid a televised kiss between Roseanne and Mariel Hemingway would destroy ratings and ruin advertising. The episode was instead the week's highest rated.[22]: 394, 399 By far the sitcom with the most significant impact to the image of lesbians was Ellen. Publicity surrounding Ellen's coming out episode in 1997 was enormous; Ellen DeGeneres appeared on the cover of Time magazine the week before the airing of "The Puppy Episode" with the headline "Yep, I'm Gay". Parties were held in many U.S. cities to watch the episode, and the opposition from conservative organizations was intense. WBMA-LP, the ABC affiliate in Birmingham, Alabama, even refused to air the first run of the episode, citing conservative values of the local viewing audience, which earned the station some infamy and ire in the LGBT community. Even still, "The Puppy Episode" won an Emmy for writing, but as the show began to deal with Ellen Morgan's sexuality each week, network executives grew uncomfortable with the direction the show took and canceled it.[155]: 245–249
Dramas following L.A. Law began incorporating homosexual themes, particularly with continuing storylines on Relativity, Picket Fences, ER, and Star Trek: The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine, both of which tested the boundaries of sexuality and gender.[155]: 128–136 A show directed at adolescents that had a particularly strong cult following was Buffy the Vampire Slayer. In the fourth season of Buffy, Tara and Willow admit their love for each other without any special fanfare and the relationship is treated as are the other romantic relationships on the show.[155]: 183–184
What followed was a series devoted solely to gay characters from network television. Showtime's American rendition of Queer as Folk ran for five years, from 2000 to 2005; two of the main characters were a lesbian couple. Showtime promoted the series as "No Limits", and Queer as Folk addressed homosexuality graphically. The aggressive advertising paid off as the show became the network's highest rated, doubling the numbers of other Showtime programs after the first season.[155]: 150–152 In 2004, Showtime introduced The L Word, a dramatic series devoted to a group of lesbian and bisexual women, running its final season in 2009.[citation needed]
Chic and popular culture
[edit]
Lesbian visibility has improved since the early 1980s. This is in part due to public figures who have drawn speculation from the public and comment in the press about their sexuality and lesbianism in general. The primary figure earning this attention was Martina Navratilova, who served as tabloid fodder for years as she denied being lesbian, admitted to being bisexual, had very public relationships with Rita Mae Brown and Judy Nelson, and acquired as much press about her sexuality as she did her athletic achievements. Navratilova spurred what scholar Diane Hamer termed "constant preoccupation" in the press with determining the root of same-sex desire.[158]
Other public figures acknowledged their homosexuality and bisexuality, notably musicians k.d. lang and Melissa Etheridge. Madonna pushed sexual boundaries in her performances. In 1993, heterosexual supermodel Cindy Crawford posed for the August cover of Vanity Fair in a provocative arrangement that showed Crawford pretending to shave lang's face, as lang lounged in a barber's chair wearing a pinstripe suit.[159] The image "became an internationally recognized symbol of the phenomenon of lesbian chic", according to Hamer.[158] The year 1994 marked a rise in lesbian visibility, particularly appealing to women with feminine appearances. Between 1992 and 1994, Mademoiselle, Vogue, Cosmopolitan, Glamour, Newsweek, and New York magazines featured stories about women who admitted sexual histories with other women.[157]
One analyst reasoned the recurrence of lesbian chic was due to the often-used homoerotic subtexts of gay male subculture being considered off-limits because of AIDS in the late 1980s and 1990s, joined with the distant memory of lesbians as they appeared in the 1970s: unattractive and militant. In short, lesbians became more attractive to general audiences when they ceased having political convictions.[158] All the attention on feminine and glamorous women created what culture analyst Rodger Streitmatter characterizes as an unrealistic image of lesbians packaged by heterosexual men; the trend influenced an increase in the inclusion of lesbian material in pornography aimed at men.[157]
A resurgence of lesbian visibility was noted in 2009 when sexually fluid female celebrities, such as Cynthia Nixon and Lindsay Lohan, commented openly about their relationships with women, and reality television addressed same-sex relationships. Psychiatrists and feminist philosophers wrote that the rise in women acknowledging same-sex relationships was due to growing social acceptance, but also conceded that "only a certain kind of lesbian—slim and elegant or butch in just the right androgynous way—is acceptable to mainstream culture."[160]
Family and politics
[edit]Before the 1970s, the idea that same-sex adults formed long-term committed relationships was unknown to many people. In the 1990s in the U.S., the majority of lesbians (between 60% and 80%) reported being in a long-term relationship.[22]: 117 Sociologists credit the high number of paired women to women's higher propensity to commit to relationships. Unlike heterosexual relationships that tend to divide work based on sex roles, lesbian relationships divide chores evenly between both members. Studies have also reported that emotional bonds are closer in lesbian and gay relationships than heterosexual ones.[22]: 118–119
Family issues were significant concerns for lesbians when gay activism became more vocal in the 1960s and 1970s. Custody issues in particular were of interest since often courts would not award custody to mothers who were openly homosexual, even though the general procedure acknowledged children were awarded to the biological mother.[22]: 125–126 [44]: 182
Several studies performed as a result of custody disputes compared outcomes for children of single lesbian mothers and single nonlesbian mothers. They found that children's mental health, happiness, overall adjustment, sexual orientation, and sex roles, were similar between both groups.[22]: 125–126
As of 2025, same-sex marriage is legal in thirty-eight countries, and eight countries offer civil unions. Thirty-five countries have created laws specifically prohibiting same-sex marriage.[citation needed]
The ability to adopt domestically or internationally children or provide a home as a foster parent is also a political and family priority for many lesbians, as is improving access to artificial insemination.[22]: 128–129
See also
[edit]- African-American LGBTQ community
- Discrimination against lesbians – Irrational fear of, and aversion to, lesbians
- Domestic violence in lesbian relationships – Pattern of violent and coercive behavior in a female same-sex relationship
- Dyke – Lesbian slang term
- Dyke march – Lesbian-led gathering and protest march
- Female bonding – Close personal relationship between women
- History of lesbianism
- History of lesbianism in the United States
- Homosexual behavior in animals – Sexual behavior among non-human species that is interpreted as homosexual
- Homosociality – Socializing with the same sex
- Lesbian bar – Drinking establishment catering to lesbians
- Lesbian erasure – Act of minimizing lesbian representation
- Lesbian erotica – Visual art depiction of female-female sexuality
- Lesbian literature – Subgenre of literature with lesbian themes
- Lesbian Visibility Week – Annual observance
- LGBT themes in speculative fiction
- Lipstick lesbian – Slang for a stereotypically feminine lesbian
- List of lesbian periodicals
- Queerplatonic relationship – Non-romantic intimate partnerships
- Women's music – Movement of popular music for, by, and about women
- Yuri – Fiction genre depicting female same-sex relationships
Notes
[edit]- ^ An attempt by natives of Lesbos (also called "Mytilene" in Greece) in 2008 to reclaim the word to refer only to people from the island was unsuccessful in a Greek court. Inhabitants of Lesbos claimed the use of lesbian to refer to female homosexuality violated their human rights and "disgrace[d] them around the world".[8]
- ^ "[H]e begins by treating of the origin of human nature. The sexes were originally three, men, women, and the union of the two; and they were made round—having four hands, four feet, two faces on a round neck, and the rest to correspond. Terrible was their strength and swiftness; and they were essaying to scale heaven and attack the gods. Doubt reigned in the celestial councils; the gods were divided between the desire of quelling the pride of man and the fear of losing the sacrifices. At last Zeus hit upon an expedient. Let us cut them in two, he said; then they will only have half their strength, and we shall have twice as many sacrifices. He spake, and split them as you might split an egg with an hair; and when this was done, he told Apollo to give their faces a twist and re-arrange their persons, taking out the wrinkles and tying the skin in a knot about the navel. The two halves went about looking for one another, and were ready to die of hunger in one another's arms. Then Zeus invented an adjustment of the sexes, which enabled them to marry and go their way to the business of life. Now the characters of men differ accordingly as they are derived from the original man or the original woman, or the original man-woman. Those who come from the man-woman are lascivious and adulterous; those who come from the woman form female attachments; those who are a section of the male follow the male and embrace him, and in him all their desires centre."
- ^ In a rare instance of sexuality being the focus of a romantic friendship, two Scottish schoolteachers in the early 19th century were accused by a student of visiting in the same bed, kissing, and making the bed shake. The student's grandmother reported the teachers to the authorities, who were skeptical that their actions were sexual in nature, or that they extended beyond the bounds of normal friendship: "Are we to say that every woman who has formed an intimate friendship and has slept in the same bed with another is guilty? Where is the innocent woman in Scotland?"[6]: 233
- ^ Wollstonecraft and Blood set up a girls' boarding school so they could live and work together, and Wollstonecraft named her first child after Blood. Wollstonecraft's first novel Mary: A Fiction, in part, addressed her relationship with Fanny Blood.[51]: 55–60
- ^ Other historical figures rejected being labeled as lesbians despite their behavior: Djuna Barnes, author of Nightwood, a novel about an affair Barnes had with Thelma Wood, earned the label "lesbian writer", which she protested by saying, "I am not a lesbian. I just loved Thelma." Virginia Woolf, who modeled the hero/ine in Orlando on Vita Sackville-West, with whom she was having an affair, set herself apart from women who pursued relationships with other women by writing, "These Sapphists love women; friendship is never untinged with amorosity."[53]: 4–5
- ^ In Germany between 1898 and 1908 over a thousand articles were published regarding the topic of homosexuality.[49]: 248 Between 1896 and 1916, 566 articles on women's "perversions" were published in the United States.[48]: 49
- ^ A 1966 survey of psychological literature on homosexuality began with Freud's 1924 theory that it is a fixation on the opposite sex parent. As Freud's views were the foundation of psychotherapy, further articles agreed with this, including one in 1951 that asserted that homosexuals are actually heterosexuals that play both gender roles, and homosexuals are attempting to perpetuate "infantile, incestuous fixation(s)" on relationships that are forbidden.[60]
- ^ Historian Vern Bullough published a paper based on an unfinished study of mental and physical traits performed by a lesbian in Salt Lake City during the 1920s and 1930s. The compiler of the study reported on 23 of her colleagues, indicating there was an underground lesbian community in the conservative city. Bullough remarked that the information was being used to support the attitude that lesbians were not abnormal or maladjusted, but it also reflected that women included in the study strove in every way to conform to social gender expectations, viewing anyone who pushed the boundaries of respectability with hostility. Bullough wrote, "In fact, their very success in disguising their sexual orientation to the outside world leads us to hypothesize that lesbianism in the past was more prevalent than the sources might indicate, since society was so unsuspecting."[62]
- ^ "La muger, que con otra muger tenía deleitaciones carnales, a las quales llamaban Patlache, que quiere decir: incuba, morían ambas por ello." (Monarquía indiana, transl.)
- ^ Sexual contact, according to Kinsey, included lip kissing, deep kissing, body touching, manual breast and genital stimulation, oral breast and genital stimulation, and object-vaginal penetration.[118]: 466–467
- ^ The study estimated the total population of gays, lesbians, and bisexuals at 8.8 million, but did not differentiate between men and women.[121]
- ^ Another summary of overall surveys found that women who identify as lesbian, 80–95% had previous sexual contact with men, and some report sexual behavior that was risky.[125]
- ^ Lesbian and bisexual women are also more likely to report symptoms of multiple disorders that include major depression, panic disorder, alcohol and drug abuse.[139]
- ^ Sappho has also served as a subject of many works of literature by writers such as John Donne, Alexander Pope, Pierre Louÿs, and several anonymous writers, that have addressed her relationships with women and men. She has been used as an embodiment of same-sex desire, and as a character in fictions loosely based on her life.[53]: 125, 208, 252, 319, 566
- ^ The cross-dressing Sand was also the subject of a few of Elizabeth Barrett Browning's sonnets.[53]: 426–427 Charlotte Brontë's Villette in 1853 initiated a genre of boarding school stories with homoerotic themes.[53]: 429
- ^ A fifth novel in 1928, American author Djuna Barnes' Ladies Almanack, is a roman à clef of a lesbian literary and artistic salon in Paris and circulated at first within those circles; Susan Sniader Lanser calls it a "sister-text" to Hall's landmark work,[142] as Barnes includes a character based on Radclyffe Hall and passages that may be a response to The Well of Loneliness[143]
- ^ 21 Jump Street included a kiss between series regular Holly Robinson Peete and guest star Katy Boyer in "A Change of Heart" (1990) but it did not inspire the critical or popular attention later such kisses would engender.[156]: 235
References
[edit]- ^ Jones, Ziya (August 11, 2022). "Montreal's makeshift Pride march was more meaningful than any parade". Xtra Magazine. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
- ^ Stevens 2000, p. 748, Symbols: "Finally, two interlocking female symbols are also often used to signify lesbianism. [...] [Venus's] sign, which once represented life, love, and sexuality, is now both a botanical and zoological symbol of femaleness, as well as the astronomical symbol of the planet Venus. Lesbian and feminist communities have also adopted the symbol, using two interlocking Venus emblems to represent lesbianism or, alternatively, the sisterhood of women"
- ^ a b "Lesbian". Oxford Reference: A Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 10 April 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2018.
- ^ a b Lamos, Colleen (2000). "Lesbian". In Zimmerman, Bonnie (ed.). Encyclopedia of Lesbian Histories and Cultures (1st ed.). New York: Garland Publishing. pp. 453–454. ISBN 9780203825532.
The equivocal grammatical status of "lesbian," as both noun and adjective, captures the historical difficulty and the controversy over its definition. Whereas the former names a substantive category of persons—female homosexuals—the latter refers to a contingent attribute. The use of the term to denominate a particular kind of woman, one whose sexual desire is directed toward other women, originated in the late nineteenth century with the formulation of types of sexual deviance, especially homosexuality. ...Taking "lesbian" as an adjective, however, implies that female same-sex desire is a detachable modifier, a relative characteristic rather than an essential, or core, substance. Describing an object or activity as lesbian may simply reflect its contingent affiliation or association with female homoeroticism. Such an understanding of the term was common in Western society before the twentieth century and remains so in non-Western cultures that do not sharply distinguish female homosexuality from heterosexuality.
- ^ a b c d e f Solarz, Andrea L., ed. (1999). Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. ISBN 978-0309060936.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Aldrich, Robert (2006). Gay Life and Culture: A World History. Thames & Hudson, Ltd. ISBN 0-7893-1511-4.
- ^ Gollmann, Wilhelm (1855). The Homeopathic Guide, In All Diseases of the Urinary and Sexual Organs, Including the Derangements Caused by Onanism and Sexual Excesses. Charles Julius Hempel; J. Emerson Kent. Philadelphia: Rademacher & Sheek. p. 201.
- ^ "Lesbos locals lose lesbian appeal". BBC News Europe. 22 July 2008. Archived from the original on 4 March 2011. Retrieved 3 February 2009.
- ^ a b c Stevens, Christy (2000). "Symbols". In Zimmerman, Bonnie (ed.). Encyclopedia of Lesbian Histories and Cultures (1st ed.). New York: Garland Publishing. pp. 748, 776–777. ISBN 9780203825532.
- ^ Cohen, Margaret; Dever, Carolyn, eds. (2001). "Chapter Ten: Comparative Sapphism, Sharon Marcus". The Literary Channel: The Inter-National Invention of the Novel (PDF). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 251–285. ISBN 978-0691050010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-11-29. Retrieved 2014-11-20. (Document made available by Columbia University Libraries. PDF downloads automatically.)
- ^ "Lesbian Terms & Code In Women's LGBTQ History". Girl Friends of Dorothy. Archived from the original on 9 February 2025. Retrieved 5 July 2025.
- ^ "Lesbian", Oxford English Dictionary Archived 2006-06-25 at the Wayback Machine, Second Edition, 1989. Retrieved on January 7, 2009.
- ^ Bendix, Trish (8 September 2015). "Why don't lesbians have a pride flag of our own?". AfterEllen. Archived from the original on 9 September 2015. Retrieved 23 July 2019.
- ^ Andersson, Jasmine (4 July 2019). "Pride flag guide: what the different flags look like, and what they all mean". The i Paper. Archived from the original on 24 August 2019. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
- ^ Rawles, Timothy (July 12, 2019). "The many flags of the LGBT community". San Diego Gay & Lesbian News. Archived from the original on July 12, 2019. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
- ^ "Lesbian Flag, Sadlesbeandisaster". Majestic Mess. April 2019. Archived from the original on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 24 August 2019.
- ^ Murphy-Kasp, Paul (6 July 2019). "Pride in London: What do all the flags mean?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 17 June 2020. Retrieved 11 July 2019.
- ^ Roselli, C.E. (2018). "Neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation". Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 30 (7) e12562. doi:10.1111/jne.12562. PMC 6677266. PMID 29211317.
- ^ McFadden, Dennis (April 2011). "Sexual orientation and the auditory system". Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 32 (2): 201–213. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.02.001. PMC 3085661. PMID 21310172.
- ^ a b Breedlove SM (August 2017). "Prenatal Influences on Human Sexual Orientation: Expectations versus Data". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 46 (6): 1583–1592. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0904-2. PMC 5786378. PMID 28176027.
- ^ Långström, N; Rahman, Q; Carlström E, E; Lichtenstein, P (2020). "Genetic and environmental effects on same-sex sexual behavior: a population study of twins in Sweden". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 39: 75–80. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9386-1. PMID 18536986.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Schlager, Neil, ed. (1998). Gay & Lesbian Almanac. St. James Press. ISBN 1-55862-358-2.
- ^ Rust, Paula C. (November 1992). "The Politics of Sexual Identity: Sexual Attraction and Behavior among Lesbian and Bisexual Women". Social Problems. 39 (4): 366–386. doi:10.2307/3097016. ISSN 0037-7791. JSTOR 3097016.
- ^ Farr, Rachel H.; Diamond, Lisa M.; Boker, Steven M. (2014). "Female Same-Sex Sexuality from a Dynamical Systems Perspective: Sexual Desire, Motivation, and Behavior". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 43 (8): 1477–1490. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z. ISSN 0004-0002. PMC 4199863. PMID 25193132.
- ^ R Dennis Shelby; Kathleen Dolan (2014). Lesbian Women and Sexual Health: The Social Construction of Risk and Susceptibility. Routledge. p. 34. ISBN 978-1317718192. Retrieved April 11, 2018.
- ^ Lisa M. Diamond (2009). Sexual Fluidity. Harvard University Press. pp. 105–106. ISBN 978-0674033696. Retrieved July 20, 2014.
- ^ Diamond, Lisa M.; Dickenson, Janna A.; Blair, Karen L. (2022-01-01). "Menstrual Cycle Changes in Daily Sexual Motivation and Behavior Among Sexually Diverse Cisgender Women". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 51 (1): 577–588. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02171-w. ISSN 1573-2800. PMID 35028805.
Women with exclusive same-gender orientations reported increased motivation for same-gender sexual contact during the higher-fertility phase of the cycle, but women with exclusive other-gender orientations did not show a parallel increase in other-gender sexual motivation during the higher-fertility phase. ... As noted earlier, the same pattern of difference between women with exclusive same-gender attractions versus bisexual attractions also emerged in the small pilot study of 20 women conducted by Diamond and Wallen (2011). ... Although this suggests important similarities between bisexual women and those with exclusive same-gender orientations, other research (reviewed by Chivers, 2017) has found that self-identified lesbians show more "category-specific" patterns of genital arousal than other groups of women, meaning that they show significantly greater arousal to the stimuli that they report preferring (women) than to their nonpreferred stimuli (men).
- ^ Blumstein, Philip; Schwartz, Pepper (1983). American Couples: Money, Work, Sex. New York: William Morrow and Company. ISBN 9780688037727.
- ^ White, Ro (August 4, 2022). "The Gay B C's of Sex: L Is for Lesbian Bed Death". Autostraddle. Retrieved September 14, 2025.
- ^ Nichols, Margaret (2004). "Lesbian sexuality/female sexuality: Rethinking 'lesbian bed death'". Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 19 (4): 363–371. doi:10.1080/14681990412331298036. S2CID 143879852.
- ^ a b Yurcaba, Jo (April 9, 2024). "New research helps explain why lesbians report more orgasms than straight women". NBC. Retrieved August 2, 2025.
- ^ Frederick, David A.; Gillespie, Brian Joseph; Lever, Janet; Berardi, Vincent; Garcia, Justin R. (2021-11-01). "Debunking Lesbian Bed Death: Using Coarsened Exact Matching to Compare Sexual Practices and Satisfaction of Lesbian and Heterosexual Women". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50 (8): 3601–3619. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02096-4. ISSN 1573-2800. PMID 34725751.
- ^ a b Castleman, Michael (February 28, 2023). "Debunking the Myth of 'Lesbian Bed Death'". Psychology Today. Retrieved August 2, 2025.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Norton, Rictor (1997). The Myth of the Modern Homosexual: Queer History and the Search for Cultural Unity. London: Cassell. ISBN 0-304-33892-3.
- ^ a b c Rabinowitz, Nancy; Auanger, Lisa, eds. (2002). Among Women: From the Homosocial to the Homoerotic in the Ancient World. University of Texas Press. pp. 2, 11, 115, 148. ISBN 0-292-77113-4.
- ^ Dunn, Daisy (30 July 2024). "The First Lesbian: How Sappho's Poetry Paved the Way for Modern Queer Literature". LitHub. Retrieved 5 July 2025.
- ^ Plato. The Symposium. Project Gutenberg: Project Gutenberg.
- ^ "LUCIAN:Dialogues of the Courtesans Section 5: LEAENA AND CLONARIUM". Internet History Sourcebooks Project. Fordham University. Archived from the original on October 3, 2024. Retrieved May 21, 2025.
- ^ Bremmer, Jan, ed. (1989). From Sappho to de Sade: Moments in the History of Sexuality. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-02089-1.
- ^ a b c d Hewitt, Sean; Hall, Luke Edward (2023). 300,000 Kisses: Tales of Queer Love from the Ancient World. Clarkson Potter/Publishers, an imprint of Crown Publishing Group. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-593-58244-2.
- ^ Coray, Joseph Andrew (2001). Sexual diversity and Catholicism: toward the development of moral theology By Patricia Beattie Jung, Joseph Andrew Coray. Liturgical Press. ISBN 9780814659397. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 29 November 2014.
- ^ Lopez-Canete Quilles, Daniel. "There's something fishy about Philaenis: Epigram 9.62 and related epigrams". BREPOLS. p. 72-82. doi:10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.125292. Archived from the original on 20 June 2022. Retrieved 5 July 2025.
- ^ Milnor, Kristina (2014). Graffiti & the Literary Landscape in Roman Pompeii. Oxford University Press.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Jennings, Rebecca (2007). A Lesbian History of Britain. Greenwood World Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84645-007-5.
- ^ Chess, Simone (2016). Male-to-Female Crossdressing in Early Modern English Literature: Gender, Performance, and Queer Relations. New York: Routledge. p. 16. ISBN 978-1138951211.
(and Frith, by extension) has been described in scholarship as a roaring girl, a transvestite, a lesbian, and, more recently, as both (proto-) butch and transgender.
- ^ Dekker, Rudolf M.; van de Pol, Lotte C. (1989). The Tradition of Female Transvestism in Early Modern Europe. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0333412527.
- ^ Lucas, R. Valerie (1988). ""Hic Mulier": The Female Transvestite in Early Modern England". Renaissance and Reformation. 12 (1): 65–84. ISSN 0034-429X. JSTOR 43445585.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa Faderman, Lillian (1991). Odd Girls and Twilight Lovers: A History of Lesbian Life in Twentieth Century America (paperback ed.). Penguin Books. ISBN 0140171223.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Faderman, Lillian (1981). Surpassing the Love of Men: Romantic Friendship and Love Between Women from the Renaissance to the Present. Quill. ISBN 0-688-00396-6.
- ^ Rothblum, Esther; Brehoney, Kathleen, eds. (1993). Boston Marriages: Romantic But Asexual Relationships Among Contemporary Lesbians. University of Massachusetts Press. pp. 4–7. ISBN 0-87023-875-2.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Foster, Jeannette H. (1956). Sex Variant Women in Literature, Naiad Press edition, 1985. ISBN 0-930044-65-7
- ^ Katz, Jonathan (1976). Gay American History: Lesbians and Gay Men in the U.S.A. Thomas Y. Crowell Company. pp. 212–214. ISBN 0-690-01165-2.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Castle, Terry, ed. (2003). The Literature of Lesbianism: A Historical Anthology from Ariosto to Stonewall. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-12510-0.
- ^ Coleman, Jenny (2001). "Unsettled Women: Deviant Genders in Late Nineteenth-and Early Twentieth-Century New Zealand". Journal of Lesbian Studies. 5 (1–2): 13–26. doi:10.1300/J155v05n01_02. PMID 24807564. S2CID 22507224.
- ^ Mercer, Kobena (2016). Travel & See: Black Diasporic Art Practices Since the 1980s. Durham: Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-7451-0.
- ^ a b c d e Edsall, Nicholas (2003). Toward Stonewall: Homosexuality and Society in the Modern Western World. University of Virginia Press. ISBN 0-8139-2211-9.
- ^ Brendan (January 10, 2012). "Berlin's Lesbische Frauen". Cabaret Berlin. Archived from the original on 28 May 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2020. (originally published by Slow Travel Berlin)
- ^ Tamagne, Florence (2004). A History of Homosexuality in Europe Berlin, London, Paris, 1919–1939. Vol. 1. Algora. pp. 53–57. ISBN 0-585-49198-4.
- ^ a b c Doan, Laura (2001). Fashioning Sapphism: The Origins of a Modern English Lesbian Culture. Columbia University Press. pp. XIII, XV, 64–66. ISBN 0-231-11007-3.
- ^ Zucker, Luise J. (July 1966). "Mental health and homosexuality". Journal of Sex Research. 2 (2): 111–125. doi:10.1080/00224496609550506.
- ^ a b McVea, Denise (2000). "Harlem". In Zimmerman, Bonnie (ed.). Encyclopedia of Lesbian Histories and Cultures (1st ed.). New York: Garland Publishing. pp. 354–355, 383–385. ISBN 9780203825532.
- ^ Bullough, Vern; Bullough, Bonnie (July 1977). "Lesbianism in the 1920s and 1930s: A Newfound Study". Signs. 2 (4): 895–904. doi:10.1086/493419. PMID 21213641. S2CID 145652567.
- ^ a b c d Berube, Allan (1990). Coming Out Under Fire: The History of Gay Men and Women in World War II, The Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-1071-9
- ^ a b "Lesbians Under the Nazi Regime". Holocaust Encyclopedia. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. March 31, 2021. Archived from the original on 25 March 2022. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
- ^ a b Elman, Amy (Winter 1996–97). "Triangles and Tribulations: The Gay Appropriation of Nazi Symbols" (PDF). Trouble & Strife (34): 64. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 June 2021. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
An earlier version of this article appeared in Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 30, issue 3, 1996.
(doi:10.1300/J082v30n03_01. PMID 8743114. ISSN 0091-8369.) - ^ a b Adam, Barry (1987). The Rise of a Gay and Lesbian Movement. G. K. Hall & Co. pp. 56, 59. ISBN 0-8057-9714-9.
- ^ a b Esterberg, Kristin Gay (1990). "From illness to action: Conceptions of homosexuality in The Ladder, 1956–1965". Journal of Sex Research. 27 (1): 65–80. doi:10.1080/00224499009551542.
- ^ Willett, Graham (2000). Living Out Loud: A History of Gay and Lesbian Activism in Australia. Allen & Unwin. pp. 10–11. ISBN 1-74115-113-9.
- ^ Warner, Tom (2002). Never Going Back: A History of Queer Activism in Canada. University of Toronto Press. p. 27. ISBN 0-8020-8460-5.
- ^ Gallo, Marcia (2006). Different Daughters: A History of the Daughters of Bilitis and the Rise of the Lesbian Rights Movement. Seal Press. p. 3. ISBN 1-58005-252-5.
- ^ a b Stryker, Susan (2001). Queer Pulp: Perverted Passions from the Golden Age of the Paperback. Chronicle Books, LLC. pp. 49, 54–57. ISBN 0-8118-3020-9.
- ^ a b c Keller, Yvonne (June 2005). ""Was It Right to Love Her Brother's Wife so Passionately?": Lesbian Pulp Novels and U.S. Lesbian Identity, 1950-1965". American Quarterly. 57 (2): 385–410. doi:10.1353/aq.2005.0028. ISSN 0003-0678. JSTOR 40068271. OCLC 1480637. S2CID 144844572.
- ^ Forbidden Love: The Unashamed Stories of Lesbian Lives. Dir. Fernie, L., Weissman. Videocassette. Women Make Movies Home Video, 1994.
- ^ Zimet, Jaye (1999). Strange Sisters: The Art of Lesbian Pulp Fiction, 1949–1969. Viking Studio. pp. 17–24. ISBN 0-14-028402-8.
- ^ Nestle, Joan (1983). "Desire So Big It Had to Be Brave", Lesbian Herstory Archives.
- ^ Martin, Del; Lyon, Phyllis (1991). Lesbian / Woman. Volcano Press. ISBN 0-912078-91-X.
- ^ Esterberg, Kristin G. (September 1994). "From Accommodation to Liberation: A Social Movement Analysis of Lesbians in the Homophile Movement". Gender & Society. 8 (3): 424–443. doi:10.1177/089124394008003008. S2CID 144795512.
- ^ Esterberg, Kristin G. (September 1994). "From Accommodation to Liberation: A Social Movement Analysis of Lesbians in the Homophile Movement". Gender & Society. 8 (3): 424–443. doi:10.1177/089124394008003008. S2CID 144795512.
- ^ Battle, Juan Jose; Bennett, Michael; Lemelle, Anthony J. (2006). Free at Last?: Black America in the Twenty-First Century. Transaction Publishers.
- ^ Kyper, John. "Black Lesbians Meet in October." Coming Up: A Calendar of Events 1 (Oct. 1980): 1. Web.
- ^ Mathewson, Eryn Ashleigh (2016-07-05). "Black Lesbian Leaders Discuss Coming Together, Raising the Profile". Women's eNews. Retrieved 2024-03-04.
- ^ Faderman, Lillian (April 1992). "The Return of Butch and Femme: A Phenomenon in Lesbian Sexuality in the 1980s and 1990s". Journal of the History of Sexuality. 2 (4): 578–596. JSTOR 3704264.
- ^ Neumann, Caryn E. (July 11, 2013). "Angela Davis". Encyclopedia of Alabama. Archived from the original on February 27, 2021. Retrieved March 24, 2021.
- ^ a b c Myers, JoAnne (2013). "Black Lesbians". Historical Dictionary of the Lesbian and Gay Liberation Movements (1st ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. p. 85. ISBN 978-0810872264. LCCN 2019715841.
- ^ a b Zimmerman, Bonnie (2000). Encyclopedia of Lesbian Histories and Cultures (1st ed.). New York: Garland Publishing. ISBN 9780203825532.
- ^ a b Ruth, Richard; Santacruz, Erik, eds. (2017). LGBT Psychology and Mental Health: Emerging Research and Advances. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger Publishing. ISBN 978-1440843372.
- ^ a b Bridges, Sara K.; Selvidge, Mary M. D.; Matthews, Connie R. (April 2003). "Lesbian Women of Color: Therapeutic Issues and Challenges". Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development. 31 (2): 113–130. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1912.2003.tb00537.x. ISSN 0883-8534.
- ^ a b c Amer, Sahar (2009). "Medieval Arab Lesbians and Lesbian-Like Women". Journal of the History of Sexuality. 18 (2): 215–236. doi:10.1353/sex.0.0052. ISSN 1043-4070. JSTOR 40663351. PMID 19768852. S2CID 26652886.
- ^ Allouche, Sabiha (Spring 2019). "The Reluctant Queer". Kohl: a Journal for Body and Gender Research. 5 (1): 11–22. doi:10.36583/kohl/5-1-3.
- ^ a b c d Murray, Stephen O.; Roscoe, Will (1997). Islamic Homosexualities: Culture, History and Literature. New York University Press. pp. 98–104, 283–284. ISBN 0-8147-7468-7.
- ^ a b Amer, Sahar (2 May 2009). "Medieval Arab Lesbians and Lesbian-Like Women". Journal of the History of Sexuality. 18 (2): 215–236. doi:10.1353/sex.0.0052. PMID 19768852. S2CID 26652886. Archived from the original on 2 April 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2025.
- ^ Fisk, Robert (7 September 2010). "Robert Fisk: The crimewave that shames the world". The Independent. Archived from the original on October 25, 2012. Retrieved 8 September 2010.
- ^ "GayLawNet - Laws - Yemen". Gaylawnet.com. Archived from the original on 7 November 2021. Retrieved 21 May 2025.
- ^ Gerber, Paula (17 March 2014). "Countries that still criminalise homosexuality". AntiGayLaws. Retrieved 21 May 2025.
- ^ "'Egypt failed her': LGBT activist kills herself in Canada after suffering post-prison trauma". Middle East Eye. 15 June 2020. Archived from the original on 7 April 2023. Retrieved 23 May 2025.
- ^ a b c Kimball, Geoffrey (6 December 1993). "Aztec Homosexuality: The Textual Evidence". Journal of Homosexuality. 26 (1): 7–24. doi:10.1300/J082v26n01_02. PMID 8113605.
- ^ a b c d e f Mogrovejo, Norma (2004). "Relevancia de las lesbianas en América Latina: la recuperación de nuestra historia". In Drucker, Péter; Mercad, Enrique (in Spanish). Arco iris diferentes. Siglo XXI. ISBN 978-968-23-2486-4. pp. 85–103, 281-294
- ^ Vowel, Chelsea (2016). "All My Queer Relations - Language, Culture, and Two-Spirit Identity". Indigenous Writes: A Guide to First Nations, Métis & Inuit Issues in Canada. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Highwater Press. ISBN 978-1553796800.
- ^ a b c Pruden, Harlan; Edmo, Se-ah-dom (2016). "Two-Spirit People: Sex, Gender & Sexuality in Historic and Contemporary Native America" (PDF). National Congress of American Indians Policy Research Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-07-08. Retrieved 2018-09-01.
- ^ Estrada, Gabriel (2011). "Two Spirits, Nádleeh, and LGBTQ2 Navajo Gaze". American Indian Culture and Research Journal. 35 (4): 167–190. doi:10.17953/aicr.35.4.x500172017344j30 (inactive 1 July 2025). Archived from the original on 13 August 2023. Retrieved 19 August 2023.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link) - ^ a b "A Spirit of Belonging, Inside and Out". The New York Times. 8 Oct 2006. Archived from the original on 8 June 2021. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
'The elders will tell you the difference between a gay Indian and a Two-Spirit,' [Criddle] said, underscoring the idea that simply being gay and Indian does not make someone a Two-Spirit.
- ^ Pember, Mary Annette (Oct 13, 2016). "'Two Spirit' Tradition Far From Ubiquitous Among Tribes". Rewire. Archived from the original on October 19, 2016. Retrieved October 17, 2016.
Unfortunately, depending on an oral tradition to impart our ways to future generations opened the floodgates for early non-Native explorers, missionaries, and anthropologists to write books describing Native peoples and therefore bolstering their own role as experts. These writings were and still are entrenched in the perspective of the authors who were and are mostly white men.
- ^ Ngubane, Musa; Frank, Liz (2004). "Standing up for their rights: Coalition of African Lesbians formed in Windhoek". Sister Namibia. 16 (4): 10. ProQuest 194911079.
- ^ Murray, Stephen O. (2000). Homosexualities. University of Chicago Press. p. 249. ISBN 0-226-55195-4.
- ^ a b Martin, A; Kelly A; Turquet L; Ross S (2009). "Hate crimes: The rise of 'corrective rape' in South Africa" (PDF). ActionAid. pp. 1–2. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 8, 2012. Retrieved April 16, 2012.
- ^ Bartle, EE (2000). "Lesbians And Hate Crimes". Journal of Poverty. 4 (4): 23–44. doi:10.1300/J134v04n04_02. S2CID 144939243.
- ^ Mieses, Alexa (2009). "Gender Inequality and Corrective Rape of Women Who Have Sex with Women". GMHC Treatment Issues: 1–3.
- ^ "Corrective rape: The BackStory". CNN. October 31, 2011. Archived from the original on June 2, 2021. Retrieved December 13, 2018.
- ^ "They call it 'corrective rape'". CNN. 7 November 2011. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
- ^ a b c Di Silvio, Lorenzo (2011). "Correcting Corrective Rape: Carmichele and Developing South Africa's Affirmative Obligations To Prevent Violence Against Women". Georgetown Law Journal. 99 (5): 1469–1515.
- ^ Mabuse, Nkepile (28 October 2011). "Horror of South Africa's 'corrective rape'". CNN. Archived from the original on 17 April 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
- ^ "South African lesbians at risk for 'corrective rape'". Contemporary Sexuality. 45 (7): 8. 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f g Sullivan, Gerard; Jackson, Peter, eds. (2001). Gay and Lesbian Asia: Culture, Identity, Community. Harrington Park Press. ISBN 1-56023-146-7.
- ^ Vanita, Ruth (2007). "Lesbian Studies and Activism in India". Journal of Lesbian Studies. 11 (3–4): 244–253. doi:10.1300/J155v11n03_07. PMID 17954460. S2CID 8782756.
- ^ Leonhardt, David (July 28, 2000). "John Tukey, 85, Statistician; Coined the Word 'Software'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 6, 2023. Retrieved August 29, 2019.
- ^ "Biography 15.1, John W. Tukey (1915–2000)". South-Western Educational Publishing. 2003. Archived from the original on 2015-02-27. Retrieved 2023-04-07. John Tukey criticizes sample procedure
- ^ a b Bullough, Vern L. (1998). "Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey report: Historical overview and lasting contributions". Journal of Sex Research. 35 (2): 127–131. doi:10.1080/00224499809551925.
- ^ a b c Institute for Sex Research (Kinsey, et al.) (1953). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, Saunders.
- ^ a b c Hite, Shere (1976). The Hite Report: A Nationwide Study on Female Sexuality , MacMillan. ISBN 0-02-551851-8. pp. 261, 262, 274
- ^ Wright, John, ed. "Homosexuality in the U.S., 1998–2000", The New York Times Almanac (2009), Penguin Reference. ISBN 0-14-311457-3, p. 314.
- ^ Gates, Gary [October 2006]. "Same-sex Couples and the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual Population: New Estimates from the American Community Survey", The Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy Archived 2009-02-13 at the Wayback Machine, University of California Los Angeles, pp. 1–25.
- ^ "Measuring Sexual Identity : Evaluation Report, 2010". Office for National Statistics. 23 September 2010. Archived from the original on 26 June 2015. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
- ^ Harford, Tim (1 October 2010). "More or Less examines Office for National Statistics figures on gay, lesbian and bisexual people". BBC. Archived from the original on 5 November 2015. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
- ^ Wilson, Shaun (December 2004). "Gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender identification and attitudes to same-sex relationships in Australia and the United States" (PDF). People and Place. 12 (4): 12–22. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-02-17. Retrieved 2022-02-16.
- ^ a b c d Holmes, King, Sparling, P., et al., eds. (2008). Sexually Transmitted Diseases, McGraw-Hill Medical. ISBN 0-07-141748-6. pp. 219, 221, 226, 229.
- ^ a b Mravack, Sally A. (July 2006). "Primary Care for Lesbians and Bisexual Women". American Family Physician. 74 (2): 279–286. PMID 16883925.
- ^ Diamant, Allison L. (1999). "Lesbians' Sexual History With Men Implications for Taking a Sexual History". Arch Intern Med. 159 (22): 2730–2736. doi:10.1001/archinte.159.22.2730. PMID 10597764.
- ^ Vo, Christine; Carney, Michael E. (2007). "Ovarian Cancer Hormonal and Environmental Risk Effect". Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 34 (4): 687–700. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2007.09.008. PMID 18061864.
- ^ a b Rosser, Sue V. (2000). "Health". In Zimmerman, Bonnie (ed.). Encyclopedia of Lesbian Histories and Cultures (1st ed.). New York: Garland Publishing. pp. 359–362. ISBN 9780203825532.
- ^ a b "Frequently Asked Questions: Lesbian Health". womenshealth.gov. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Archived from the original on 29 January 2009. Retrieved 12 January 2009.
- ^ a b Haines, Megan E.; Erchull, Mindy J.; Liss, Miriam; Turner, Dixie L.; Nelson, Jaclyn A.; Ramsey, Laura R.; Hurt, Molly M. (2008). "Predictors and Effects of Self-Objectification in Lesbians". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 32 (2): 181–187. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00422.x. S2CID 145638302.
- ^ Women Who Have Sex with Women (WSW), Centers for Disease Control, 2006 (MMWR August 4, 2006 / Vol. 55 / No. RR—11). Retrieved on January 9, 2009. Archived March 8, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Frenkl, Tara Lee; Potts, Jeannette (2008). "Sexually Transmitted Infections". Urologic Clinics of North America. 35 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2007.09.003. PMID 18061022. S2CID 79651023.
- ^ Risser, Jan M.H.; Risser, William L.; Risser, Amanda L. (2008). "Epidemiology of Infections in Women". Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 22 (4): 581–599. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2008.05.001. PMID 18954753.
- ^ "HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report: Cases of HIV Infection and AIDS in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2006". Centers for Disease Control. Archived from the original on 16 October 2020. Retrieved 9 January 2009.
- ^ a b c Cochran, Susan D.; Sullivan, J. Greer; Mays, Vickie M. (2003). "Prevalence of mental disorders, psychological distress, and mental health services use among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 71 (1): 53–61. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.1.53. PMC 4197971. PMID 12602425.
- ^ Rust, Paula C. (March 1993). "'Coming out' in the Age of Social Constructionism Sexual Identity Formation among Lesbian and Bisexual Women". Gender & Society. 7 (1): 50–77. doi:10.1177/089124393007001004. S2CID 145206767.
- ^ Moagi, Miriam; van der Wath, Anna (20 Jan 2021). "Mental health challenges of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people: An integrated literature review". Health Sa = Sa Gesondheid. 26. NIH National Library of Medicine: 1487. doi:10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1487. PMC 7876969. PMID 33604059.
- ^ Cochran, et al., 2003.
- ^ Drabble, Laurie; Trocki, Karen (2005). "Alcohol Consumption, Alcohol-Related Problems, and Other Substance Use Among Lesbian and Bisexual Women". Journal of Lesbian Studies. 9 (3): 19–30. doi:10.1300/J155v09n03_03. PMID 17548282. S2CID 27973277.
- ^ Lanser, 1979, p. 39.
- ^ Lanser, Susan Sniader (1979). "Speaking in Tongues: 'Ladies Almanack' and the Language of Celebration". Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. 4 (3): 39–48. doi:10.2307/3346147. JSTOR 3346147.
- ^ Barnes, Djuna. With an introduction by Susan Sniader Lanser. (1992). Ladies Almanack, New York University Press. ISBN 0-8147-1180-4. p. xxxi
- ^ Packer, Vin (Marijane Meaker). Spring Fire, Introduction. 2004, Cleis Press.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Benshoff, Harry; Griffin, Sean (2006). Queer Images: A History of Gay and Lesbian Film in America. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 0-7425-1971-6.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Russo, Vito (1987). The Celluloid Closet: Homosexuality in the Movies. Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-096132-5.
- ^ The Celluloid Closet. Dir. Epstein, R., Friedman, J. DVD, Home Box Office, 1996.
- ^ Curtin, Kaier (1987). "The First Lesbian Character Ever Seen on an English-language Stage". We Can Always Call Them Bulgarians: The Emergence of Lesbians and Gay Men on the American Stage. Boston, Massachusetts: Alyson Publications. pp. 25–42. ISBN 0-932870-36-8.
- ^ Curtin, Kaier (Spring 1988). "Yiddish Lesbian Play Rocks Broadway". Lilith. No. 5748. Archived from the original on 11 April 2020. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
- ^ Gold, Sylviane (15 October 2015). "'Indecent' Opens Yale Repertory Theater Season". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 October 2015. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
- ^ "'Indecent': A Play About A Yiddish Play That Was Ahead Of Its Time". NPR. 29 April 2017. Archived from the original on 3 June 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
- ^ Vagianos, Alanna (November 22, 2018). "Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade Features Same-Sex Kiss In Historic Moment". HuffPost. Archived from the original on 1 July 2019. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
- ^ Wild, Stephi (23 November 2018). "THE PROM Makes History With First LGBTQ Kiss on Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade". BroadwayWorld. Archived from the original on 3 June 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
- ^ Kircher, Madison Malone (June 13, 2020). "Jagged Little Pill's Lauren Patten Will Not Admit That She Steals the Show". Vulture. Archived from the original on 2 July 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Tropiano, Stephen (2002). Prime Time Closet: A History of Gays and Lesbians on TV. Applause Theater and Cinema Books. ISBN 1-55783-557-8.
- ^ Capsuto, Steven (2000). Alternate Channels: The Uncensored Story of Gay and Lesbian Images on Radio and Television (1st ed.). New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-345-41243-5.
- ^ a b c Streitmatter, Rodger (2009). From 'Perverts' to 'Fab Five': The Media's Changing Depiction of Gay Men and Lesbians. Routledge. pp. 77–78, 81, 104. ISBN 978-0-7890-3670-4.
- ^ a b c Hamer, Diane, Budge, Belinda, eds. (1994). The Good, The Bad, and the Gorgeous: Popular Culture's Romance with Lesbianism, Pandora. ISBN 0-04-440910-9. pp. 1, 57–77, 87–90.
- ^ Bennetts, Leslie (August 1, 1993). "k.d. lang Cuts It Close". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
- ^ Fischer, Mary A. (April 23, 2009). "Why women are leaving men for other women". CNN. Archived from the original on March 20, 2010. Retrieved April 23, 2009.
Further reading
[edit]- Books
- Castle, Terry (1995). The Apparitional Lesbian: Female Homosexuality and Modern Culture (1st ed.). Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-07652-5.
- Cogan, Jeanine C.; Erickson, Joanie M., eds. (1999). Lesbians, Levis and Lipstick: The Meaning of Beauty in Our Lives. The Haworth Press. ISBN 0-7890-0661-8.
- Cooper, Sara E., ed. (2010). Lesbian Images in International Popular Culture. Routledge. ISBN 978-1560237969.
- Jay, Karla, ed. (1995). Dyke Life: From Growing Up To Growing Old, A Celebration Of The Lesbian Experience. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0465039074.
- Kennedy, Elizabeth Lapovsky; Davis, Madeline D. (1993). Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-90293-2.
- McHugh, Kathleen A.; Johnson-Grau, Brenda; Sher, Ben Raphael, eds. (2014). The June L. Mazer Lesbian Archives: Making Invisible Histories Visible. UCLA Center for the Study of Women (Regents of the University of California). ISBN 978-0-615-99084-2.
- Morris, Bonnie J. (2016). The Disappearing L: Erasure of Lesbian Spaces and Culture (1st ed.). SUNY Press. ISBN 978-1-4384-6177-9. Archived from the original on 2017-06-27. Retrieved 2017-06-27.
- Richards, Dell (1990). Lesbian Lists: A Look at Lesbian Culture, History, and Personalities (1st ed.). Alyson Publications. ISBN 155583163X.
- Vicinus, Martha (2004). Intimate Friends: Women Who Loved Women, 1778-1928 (1st ed.). Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0226855639.
- Journals
- Katz, Sue (2017). "Working class dykes: class conflict in the lesbian/feminist movements in the 1970s". The Sixties: A Journal of History, Politics and Culture. 10 (2). Routledge: 281–289. doi:10.1080/17541328.2017.1378512. ISSN 1754-1328.
- Moreno-Domínguez, Silvia; Raposo, Tania; Elipe, Paz (2019). "Body Image and Sexual Dissatisfaction: Differences Among Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Lesbian Women". Frontiers in Psychology. 10 903. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00903. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 6520663. PMID 31143139. S2CID 147707651.
- Audio
- Guy Raz (August 7, 2010). "'Late-Life Lesbians' Reveal Fluidity Of Sexuality". All Things Considered. NPR.
External links
[edit]- Lesbian Herstory Archives
- June L. Mazer Lesbian Archives
- Bay Area Lesbian Archives (San Francisco/Oakland, California)
- Lesbian Archive at Glasgow Women's Library (Scotland)
- Southern Lesbian Feminist Activist Herstory Project
- Old Lesbian Oral Herstory Project (OLOHP)
- Old Lesbian Oral Herstory Project collection at Smith College
- Eugene Lesbian Oral History Project collection at University of Oregon Libraries
- Oral Herstorians Collection, Lesbian Feminist Activist Oral Herstory Project, Sinister Wisdom
- Lesbians in the Twentieth Century, 1900–1999, Esther Newton, OutHistory, 2008 (Lesbian History project, University of Michigan)
- Dyke, A Quarterly, published 1975–1979 (online annotated archive, live website)
- Vintage Images, Isle of Lesbos (Sappho.com)
Lesbian
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Terminology
Etymology and Historical Usage
The term "lesbian" derives from the Greek adjective Lesbios, meaning "of Lesbos," referring to the Aegean island of Lesbos, birthplace of the poet Sappho in the late 7th or early 6th century BCE.[2] Sappho's surviving poetry fragments express intense emotional and erotic attachments to women, which later scholars interpreted as homosexual desire, though the extent of her same-sex relationships remains debated due to fragmentary evidence and ancient Greek cultural contexts of female companionship.[8] [3] In antiquity, "Lesbian" primarily denoted island origin or, in some poetic usages by Homer and others, a "beautiful woman," without inherent sexual connotation for female homosexuality.[9] By the late 16th century, "Lesbian" appeared in English as a capitalized adjective for residents of Lesbos, as in translations of classical texts.[10] The sexual sense emerged gradually; in the early 19th century, German lesbisch served as a euphemism for female same-sex attraction, influencing English usage.[11] The Oxford English Dictionary records the earliest citations for "lesbian" in its adjectival sexual sense around 1732, though widespread adoption occurred later: first as an adjective in 1890 to describe women loving women, and as a noun denoting such a woman by 1925.[12] [10] Prior to "lesbian," terms like "sapphism" and "sapphist" (from Sappho) predominated in the Victorian era for female homosexuality, appearing in medical and literary contexts.[10][13] In 1883, a U.S. medical journal applied "lesbian" to describe the gender-nonconforming life of Joseph Lobdell (born Lucy Ann Lobdell), marking an early American usage linking it to female-assigned individuals with same-sex attractions.[14] By the 1920s, "lesbian" gained traction as an identity term in urban centers like Berlin, amid growing visibility of female same-sex communities, though it was not commonly self-applied until the mid-20th century feminist and gay liberation movements popularized it in the 1960s and 1970s.[15] [8] Earlier English literature occasionally alluded to female same-sex acts using terms like "tribade" or "fricatrice," derived from Latin and French, reflecting genital-rubbing practices rather than identity.[10]Modern Definitions and Distinctions
In contemporary psychological and scientific literature, lesbianism is defined as a sexual orientation characterized by a woman's predominant or exclusive emotional, romantic, and sexual attractions to other women; the term applies exclusively to women by standard usage, as a man attracted to women is heterosexual by definition. Fringe terms like "male lesbian" or "lesboy" exist in niche contexts, such as certain online gender identity discussions, but are not mainstream and can be viewed as controversial within broader communities emphasizing female-specific definitions.[1][16] This conceptualization, rooted in empirical studies of self-identified women, emphasizes enduring patterns rather than isolated acts or situational experiences, with research indicating that such attractions typically emerge by adolescence or early adulthood and persist stably over time for most individuals.[7] Key distinctions exist between lesbian orientation and bisexuality, where the latter involves substantial attractions to both sexes; surveys of thousands of women show that self-identified bisexuals report romantic or sexual interest in men at levels averaging 40-60% of their same-sex attractions, while lesbians endorse male attractions below 10% on average, highlighting a categorical difference in exclusivity.[7][17] Lesbianism also differs from heterosexuality, even among women with occasional same-sex encounters, as longitudinal data reveal that such behaviors in predominantly heterosexual women do not correlate with the consistent fantasy or identity components central to lesbian orientation.[16] Modern discussions further delineate lesbianism from "political lesbianism," a 1970s radical feminist framework viewing same-sex relations as a deliberate political rejection of male dominance rather than innate desire, which empirical evidence on the biological and developmental origins of orientation—such as twin studies showing 20-50% heritability for female same-sex attraction—largely refutes by affirming its non-volitional nature.[18][19] While women's sexuality exhibits greater fluidity than men's, with some studies documenting shifts in self-labeling over decades (e.g., 10-15% of women reporting changes in attractions), core lesbian identity remains anchored in predominant same-sex orientation, distinct from broader "queer" or non-exclusive identifiers that prioritize fluidity over specificity.[20][21]Biological and Developmental Aspects
Genetic and Epigenetic Factors
Twin and family studies have demonstrated that genetic factors contribute to female same-sex attraction, with heritability estimates ranging from 30% to 50%. A 1993 study of 71 monozygotic (identical) twin pairs where one twin was lesbian found a concordance rate of 48% for homosexuality in the co-twin, compared to 16% in 37 dizygotic (fraternal) twin pairs and 6% in adoptive sisters, indicating substantial heritable influence after accounting for base rates and ascertainment bias.[22] Subsequent analyses, including a large Swedish twin registry study, estimated genetic contributions to same-sex behavior at 34-39%, though these figures encompass both sexes and underscore that shared environment and unique experiences also play roles, as monozygotic concordance remains below 100%.[23] Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide molecular evidence of polygenic influences on same-sex sexual behavior in women, without identifying a single causative variant. A 2019 GWAS of nearly 500,000 individuals, including substantial female subsets, identified five loci associated with same-sex behavior, explaining 8-25% of variation in females; genetic correlations between male and female same-sex behavior were moderate (r_g = 0.63), suggesting partially shared but distinct architectures.[24] These findings align with earlier candidate gene approaches, which yielded inconsistent results, reinforcing that female same-sex attraction arises from numerous small-effect variants interacting with non-genetic factors, rather than deterministic alleles.[25] Epigenetic mechanisms, involving heritable changes in gene expression without DNA sequence alterations, have been hypothesized to modulate sexual orientation by canalizing fetal sexual development, potentially explaining discordance in identical twins. A 2012 model posits that sex-specific epi-marks (e.g., DNA methylation patterns) directing androgen sensitivity may fail to reset between generations, leading to atypical attraction when maternal or paternal marks mismatch offspring sex; this could account for homosexuality's persistence despite reproductive costs.[26] However, direct empirical evidence for differential epigenetic markers in lesbians remains limited, with studies primarily theoretical or extrapolated from male data, and no large-scale validations confirming causal roles in females.[27] Prenatal epigenetic influences may interact with genetic predispositions, but their precise contribution to female same-sex attraction requires further rigorous testing beyond correlative brain sex-difference observations.[28]Prenatal Hormonal Influences
Research indicates that atypical prenatal exposure to sex hormones, particularly elevated levels of androgens such as testosterone, may contribute to the development of female same-sex attraction by influencing brain organization and subsequent sexual orientation. This hypothesis posits that higher prenatal androgen exposure masculinizes certain neural pathways involved in sexual partner preference, leading to attraction toward females rather than males in genetically female individuals. Evidence supporting this comes from animal models where prenatal androgen manipulation alters female sexual behavior toward male-typical patterns, and human studies provide convergent indirect support through clinical conditions and biomarkers.[29][30] A primary line of evidence involves females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), a genetic disorder causing excessive prenatal androgen production due to impaired cortisol synthesis. Women with the salt-wasting form of CAH, who experience the highest prenatal androgen exposure, exhibit significantly elevated rates of bisexual or homosexual orientation compared to unaffected controls or those with milder forms. For instance, studies report that 20% of adolescent and adult CAH females express interest in or have engaged in homosexual relationships, rising to 44% among those over 21 years old, versus 0% in sibling controls. Similarly, bisexual/homosexual orientation is more frequent in severe CAH cases than in simple virilizing or non-classical forms, with rates exceeding general population estimates of 2-5% for exclusive homosexuality. These findings persist after controlling for postnatal factors, suggesting a prenatal causal role, though not all CAH women are non-heterosexual, indicating interplay with other influences.[31][32][33] Additional support derives from biomarkers proxying prenatal hormone levels, such as the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D), where a lower ratio reflects greater fetal testosterone exposure. Meta-analyses and large-scale studies find that lesbians, on average, display lower (more male-typical) 2D:4D ratios than heterosexual women, particularly in right-hand measurements, correlating with non-heterosexual orientation. This pattern aligns with other markers like auditory system differences (e.g., reduced female-typical otoacoustic emissions in lesbians), consistent with androgen effects on sensory development. However, results vary across studies due to small samples and ethnic differences, and the association explains only modest variance in orientation.[34][35][36] Critically, these prenatal influences do not imply determinism; sexual orientation likely arises from interactions between hormones, genetics, and environment, with no evidence that adult hormone levels substantially alter established preferences. While institutional biases in academia may underemphasize biological factors in favor of social explanations, the empirical consistency across CAH cohorts and biomarkers underscores a substantive hormonal component in lesbian orientation.[37][30]Neurological and Psychological Development
Neurological studies utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revealed structural differences in the brains of lesbian women compared to heterosexual women, often exhibiting patterns more akin to those in heterosexual men. A 2021 analysis of cortical thickness and subcortical volumes in over 2,000 participants found that non-heterosexual women displayed sex-atypical brain organization, including reduced cortical thickness in regions like the insula and increased volumes in areas such as the putamen, suggesting a biological substrate for sexual orientation that differs by sex.[38] Similarly, a 2018 study reported less gray matter in the temporo-basal cortex, ventral cerebellum, and left precentral gyrus among lesbians relative to heterosexual women, with these differences persisting after controlling for confounders like age and education.[39] Functional neuroimaging further indicates divergent responses in lesbian brains to stimuli linked to sexual arousal and mate preference. In pheromone exposure experiments, lesbian women's hypothalamic activation to male-associated odors (such as AND) mirrored that of heterosexual men, while their response to female-associated odors (EST) was weaker than in heterosexual women, pointing to an inverted sex-typical pattern established early in development.[40] Amygdala connectivity during emotional processing also shows lesbians exhibiting male-like lateralization, with stronger right-hemisphere dominance in response to same-sex stimuli, contrasting the bilateral patterns more common in heterosexual women.[41] These findings, drawn from positron emission tomography (PET) and functional MRI, underscore innate neurological underpinnings rather than learned behaviors, though sample sizes in such studies are often limited to dozens of participants per group. Psychologically, the development of lesbian orientation typically unfolds through stages of awareness and identity consolidation, with same-sex attractions often emerging in childhood or early adolescence but stabilizing later than in men. Longitudinal data from 156 sexual minority youth indicate that lesbian and bisexual women report initial awareness of attractions around age 10-12 on average, followed by self-labeling in late teens, with fluidity more pronounced in women—up to 20% shifting identities over five years—yet core orientation remaining consistent for most by adulthood.[42] Unlike stereotypes of heightened masculinity, comparative assessments find lesbian women scoring similarly to heterosexual women on psychological femininity scales, with no significant differences in traits like nurturance or expressivity, challenging psychosocial theories of origin in favor of biological continuity.[7] Identity milestones, including questioning and coming out, correlate with reduced distress when supported, but institutional biases in psychological research—prevalent in academia—may overemphasize environmental factors while underreporting stable innate traits.[16] Mental health outcomes during development show elevated risks of anxiety and depression linked to minority stress, yet twin studies affirm heritability estimates of 20-50% for female same-sex attraction, integrating neurological and psychological facets.[43]Sexual Fluidity and Gender Differences
Sexual fluidity refers to the capacity for an individual's sexual attractions, behaviors, or self-identifications to change over time or in different contexts, distinct from fixed orientations.[44] Empirical studies indicate that this phenomenon is more prevalent among women than men, with women exhibiting greater variability in self-reported sexual orientation over longitudinal periods.[44] [45] For instance, in a 10-year longitudinal study of 79 non-heterosexual women by Lisa Diamond, 67% changed their sexual identity labels at least once, often shifting between lesbian, bisexual, or other categories, while core attractions remained relatively consistent but context-dependent.[46] In contrast, men demonstrate higher stability, particularly in exclusively same-sex attractions, with lower rates of reported changes in identity or arousal patterns.[47] Gender differences in fluidity extend to physiological responses, where women, including those identifying as lesbian or heterosexual, display more equivalent genital arousal to both preferred and non-preferred gender stimuli compared to men, whose arousal patterns align more strictly with stated orientation.[47] A meta-analysis of 16 studies from 2010 to 2016 confirmed women's greater propensity for fluidity across attraction, behavior, and identity dimensions, attributing this potentially to evolutionary or socialization factors rather than measurement artifacts.[48] Among adolescents, 26% of girls reported identity fluidity versus 11% of boys, with similar disparities persisting into adulthood.[44] These patterns hold even after controlling for age and cultural factors, underscoring a biological or developmental asymmetry wherein male sexual orientation correlates more rigidly with genital arousal and self-reports.[45] For women identifying as lesbian, fluidity manifests in lower stability of exclusive same-sex patterns relative to men, with some transitioning to bisexual identifications or behaviors involving men over time, though exclusive lesbian identities remain more stable than bisexual ones.[47] [49] In Diamond's cohort, approximately 20% of women initially labeling as lesbian later adopted different identities, often citing relational or emotional contexts as influences, yet without undermining the validity of their attractions.[46] This fluidity contributes to challenges in prevalence estimates, as retrospective and prospective measures yield varying lesbian identification rates, with behavioral exclusivity less predictive of lifelong patterns in women than in men.[50] Such differences highlight causal distinctions in how sexual orientation develops, with women's greater responsiveness to social and environmental cues potentially rooted in prenatal hormonal or neural plasticity variances.[44]Historical Context
Pre-Modern and Ancient Societies
Evidence for female same-sex eroticism in ancient societies remains sparse and primarily literary, contrasting with more abundant documentation of male homosexuality. In ancient Greece, the lyric poet Sappho of Lesbos (c. 630–c. 570 BCE) provides the clearest attestation through her surviving fragments, which express intense desire for young women, often in the context of ritual or educational settings on her island. These poems, performed publicly, indicate a cultural tolerance for such expressions among elite women, though they do not confirm widespread behavioral practices equivalent to male pederasty. Archaeological finds, such as a 5th-century BCE Attic kylix depicting two women in apparent sexual embrace without phallic aids, offer rare visual corroboration, but interpretations vary due to the male-centric artistic lens of the period.[51][3][52] In ancient Rome, references to female homoeroticism appear in elite literature and art, often framed as exotic or deviant imports from Greece, intended to titillate male audiences. Authors like Martial and Juvenal mocked or sensationalized such acts, associating them with moral decay or requiring artificial phalli to mimic penetrative norms, reflecting a patriarchal emphasis on active male roles in sexuality. Legal texts, such as those under emperors like Domitian, prohibited certain female same-sex practices involving instruments, but enforcement targeted public scandal rather than private acts, with no dedicated statutes akin to those against male passivity. Visual evidence from Pompeii includes frescoes hinting at women together, yet these prioritize voyeuristic appeal over authentic female experience.[52][53] Beyond Greco-Roman contexts, documentation is even more fragmentary. In ancient Mesopotamia, cuneiform texts from the cult of Inanna (c. 2000 BCE) describe gender-variant priestesses engaging in same-sex acts, but these center male or transgender figures, with female-female relations implied only peripherally in legal codes like Hammurabi's (c. 1750 BCE), which punished non-penetrative sex harshly regardless of partners. Egyptian hieroglyphs from the Middle Kingdom (c. 2000 BCE) contain terms possibly denoting female same-sex pairings, such as in love spells or tomb inscriptions, though scholarly consensus views these as ambiguous friendships rather than erotic bonds. In ancient India, the Kama Sutra (c. 400 BCE–200 CE) briefly mentions women using straps or fingers for mutual pleasure, classifying it as a vice for widows, while earlier Vedic texts allude to tribal practices without condemnation.[54][55][56] Pre-modern Europe, spanning late antiquity to the Renaissance, saw female same-sex attraction largely unprosecuted under sodomy laws focused on male anal intercourse, though theological tracts like those of Thomas Aquinas (13th century) condemned all non-procreative acts, including tribadism, as unnatural. Scattered church records note accusations against nuns or noblewomen, often tied to heresy or witchcraft, but convictions were rare without witnesses to penetration. In Asia, Chinese dynastic histories (e.g., Han period, 206 BCE–220 CE) record palace "paired erosion" among concubines, while Japanese Heian literature (794–1185 CE) depicts class-specific female intimacies in courtly all-female environments, tolerated as ephemeral diversions. These instances highlight contextual acceptance limited by class and transience, with broader societal records overshadowed by male perspectives and patriarchal structures.[57][58]Early Modern Period to 19th Century
In early modern Europe, from approximately 1500 to 1800, female same-sex sexual acts received far less legal and social scrutiny than male homosexuality, as sodomy statutes predominantly targeted penetrative acts associated with men.[59] Sporadic prosecutions occurred, such as in the Southern Netherlands between 1400 and 1550, where female sodomy cases were exceptional and often linked to women's relative social visibility and autonomy, leading to harsher punishments for perceived disruptions of gender norms.[60] In England, cultural visibility of female homoeroticism increased modestly through literature and theater, including cross-dressing motifs on the all-male stage, but empirical evidence of widespread recognition or condemnation remains limited, with most accounts derived from legal treatises rather than frequent trials. By the 18th century, particularly in England, a phenomenon known as romantic female friendship emerged among upper-class women, characterized by intense emotional bonds, shared living arrangements, and effusive correspondence that mirrored heterosexual courtship language of the sentimental era.[61] These relationships were socially tolerated, as contemporaries often viewed women as lacking strong sexual drives or dismissed non-penetrative acts between them as innocuous, allowing space for affection without suspicion of genital contact.[62] Historians debate the sexual component, with primary sources like letters showing passionate rhetoric but no direct corroboration of physical intimacy; modern interpretations attributing eroticism to these bonds risk anachronism, given the era's norms for platonic female intimacy.[63] [64] Prominent examples include the relationship between Queen Anne (r. 1702–1714) and Sarah Churchill, Duchess of Marlborough, who were childhood companions and exchanged affectionate letters from the 1680s onward, with Anne appointing Sarah to high court positions.[65] Political opponents circulated rumors of lesbianism to undermine Anne, but these appear motivated by factional rivalry rather than evidence, as the correspondence's intensity aligns with contemporary epistolary conventions for close friends, and no contemporary accounts confirm sexual acts.[66] [67] Similarly, Eleanor Butler and Sarah Ponsonby, dubbed the Ladies of Llangollen, eloped from Ireland in 1778 at ages 39 and 23, respectively, to cohabit in Wales, attracting public fascination and visits from figures like William Wordsworth; they vehemently denied sexual impropriety, threatening legal action against insinuations and maintaining separate twin beds, with no archival proof of erotic relations despite retrospective queer readings.[68] [69] In the 19th century, romantic friendships persisted, particularly in Victorian England and urban Europe, but evolving medical discourse began framing same-sex attraction as pathological "inversion," with the term "lesbian" entering scientific usage around 1890 in contexts like Richard von Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis (1886), which cataloged female cases based on self-reports and clinical observations.[70] In Paris, female same-sex subcultures gained visibility in bohemian circles by the late 1800s, depicted in art such as Toulouse-Lautrec's works, though legal penalties remained rare absent public scandal or cross-dressing.[71] Societal misogyny inadvertently permitted such bonds by undervaluing female sexuality, yet increasing urbanization and sexology shifted perceptions toward viewing them as deviant rather than sentimental, with empirical data from asylum records and trials indicating isolated prosecutions, such as for tribadism, but no systemic enforcement.[70][72]20th Century Emergence and Visibility
In the 1920s, lesbian visibility increased within urban artistic and nightlife scenes, exemplified by Harlem Renaissance performer Gladys Bentley, who openly performed in male attire and tuxedos while identifying as lesbian, drawing crowds to her raucous blues shows in New York City.[73] Similarly, in Weimar Republic Berlin, a burgeoning lesbian subculture produced Die Freundin, the world's first dedicated lesbian magazine, published from July 1924 to 1933 with a circulation reaching up to 15,000 copies, which featured personal stories, advice columns, and cultural content before Nazi authorities shut it down in 1933.[74] These developments marked a shift from clandestine romantic friendships to more public expressions, though often confined to bohemian enclaves amid prevailing social taboos. The 1928 publication of Radclyffe Hall's novel The Well of Loneliness in London propelled lesbian themes into mainstream discourse through controversy, as the book—depicting an invert's life and relationships—was declared obscene by a British court on November 16, 1928, leading to its suppression and over 12,000 seized copies, yet sparking debates on homosexuality's legitimacy and sales exceeding 100,000 in the U.S. despite bans.[75] This trial highlighted emerging tensions between literary representation and legal censorship, amplifying awareness while reinforcing stigma. Post-World War II, U.S. lesbian communities coalesced around bar cultures in cities like New York and San Francisco, where butch-femme dynamics became prominent identifiers in the 1950s, with women adopting masculine or feminine roles to navigate visibility in underground venues subject to police raids.[76] The founding of the Daughters of Bilitis in San Francisco on October 9, 1955, by Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon established the first known lesbian civil rights organization, emphasizing mutual support and respectability politics to counter pathologization.[77] Its newsletter The Ladder, launched in October 1956 and continuing until 1972, reached thousands nationwide, publishing articles on identity, health, and activism to build discrete networks outside bars.[78] The Stonewall riots of June 28, 1969, in New York City involved lesbians such as Stormé DeLarverie, a butch performer whose resistance to arrest—reportedly shouting "Why don't you guys do something?"—helped ignite the uprising against police harassment at the Stonewall Inn, catalyzing broader gay liberation movements and annual pride events that elevated lesbian participation in public protest.[79] [80] By the late 1960s, these events transitioned lesbian visibility from isolated subcultures to collective activism, though persistent legal and social barriers, including McCarthy-era pressures that compelled figures like Bentley to publicly recant same-sex attractions in the 1950s, underscored the era's precarious gains.[73]Late 20th to Early 21st Century Shifts
Lesbian feminism emerged prominently in the 1970s as a response to the exclusion of lesbians from the broader women's liberation movement, with events like the 1970 "Lavender Menace" zap highlighting tensions and leading to the formation of separatist groups and publications.[81] This period saw the creation of women-only spaces, music festivals, and networks such as Lesbian Connection, which facilitated community building across the U.S. and beyond during the 1970s and 1980s.[82] However, by the late 1970s and into the 1980s, internal divisions arose through the "sex wars," where anti-pornography feminists, often from lesbian circles, clashed with pro-sex advocates over issues like sadomasochism and pornography, fracturing unity and contributing to the movement's decline.[83] The 1990s marked a shift toward greater mainstream visibility, influenced by "lesbian chic" in fashion and media, alongside independent films from New Queer Cinema that depicted lesbian characters more sympathetically, though often stereotypically.[84] Television milestones, such as Ellen DeGeneres's public coming out in 1997, further normalized lesbian identities, paving the way for increased representation in shows and films by the early 2000s.[85] Legally, while broader LGBTQ advances like the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas invalidated sodomy laws affecting private same-sex conduct, lesbians benefited indirectly through reduced criminalization, though specific protections lagged until expansions like the 2009 Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act included sexual orientation.[86][87] Demographically, self-identification as lesbian remained stable at around 1-2% of U.S. adults through the late 20th century, but early 21st-century surveys showed overall LGBTQ identification rising to 7.1% by 2022, driven primarily by increases in bisexual identification among young women rather than exclusive lesbian orientations.[88] Research indicates shifts toward viewing lesbian identity as more fluid, with some women adopting it later in life or alongside heterosexual experiences, influenced by cultural acceptance and queer theory, though this fluidity has raised concerns among traditionalists about the dilution of distinct lesbian categories.[21] These changes reflect broader societal liberalization, yet empirical data underscores that behavioral measures of exclusive same-sex attraction have not increased proportionally to self-reports, suggesting social desirability and identity experimentation play roles.[89]Demographics and Prevalence
Global and Regional Estimates
Estimates of women identifying as lesbian, based on self-reported sexual orientation in large-scale surveys, suggest a global average of approximately 1% among adult women.[90] This figure derives from the Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2021 survey across 30 countries, which found women less likely to identify as lesbian or homosexual (1%) compared to men as gay or homosexual (4%), with overall homosexual identification at 3%.[90] However, self-identification likely underestimates true prevalence due to social stigma, as a Yale study estimated that 83% of those with same-sex attractions globally conceal their orientation.[91] In North America, particularly the United States, reported rates are slightly higher at 1.4% of adults identifying as lesbian in a 2025 Gallup survey of over 12,000 respondents.[92] This represents an increase from prior years, driven partly by younger cohorts, though exclusive lesbian identification remains stable around 1-2% across adult women when distinguishing from bisexual labels.[88] Canadian surveys align closely, with similar low-single-digit percentages for lesbian self-identification.[93] European estimates vary by country but average 1-1.5% for women identifying as lesbian, per national health and equality surveys; for instance, UK data from the Office for National Statistics reports around 1% among women aged 16 and over.[94] Rates are higher in more secular Nordic countries (up to 2%) and lower in Eastern Europe due to cultural conservatism and underreporting.[95] In Asia and other non-Western regions, self-reported lesbian identification falls below 1%, often near 0.5% or less, as evidenced by limited surveys in countries like Japan and India, where stigma suppresses disclosure despite behavioral indicators suggesting higher underlying rates.[90] Global data gaps persist in Africa and the Middle East, where legal penalties correlate with near-zero reported figures, though anthropological studies indicate situational same-sex behaviors without self-labeling as lesbian.[95] These regional disparities highlight the influence of societal acceptance on measurement, with Western surveys yielding more reliable self-reports.[91]Self-Identification vs. Behavioral Measures
In national probability surveys, the proportion of women self-identifying as lesbian is markedly lower than the proportion reporting same-sex sexual behavior. For instance, in the United Kingdom's National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3, conducted 2010–2012), 15.0% (95% CI: 14.0%–16.1%) of women aged 16–74 reported at least one same-sex sexual partner in their lifetime, compared to self-identification rates for lesbian or gay women of approximately 0.5%–1% in contemporaneous Office for National Statistics data.[96][97] Similarly, U.S. data from the National Survey of Family Growth (2006–2010) indicated that about 1.5% of women aged 15–44 identified as lesbian or gay, while 11.4% reported at least one female sexual partner.[98][99] This discordance—termed identity-behavior discordance (IBD)—is more pronounced among women than men, with studies attributing it to greater sexual fluidity in female orientation, where same-sex experiences often do not alter primary heterosexual identification. In a analysis of U.S. youth data, 9.0% reported some same-gender attraction and 4.0% same-gender behavior, yet only 3.4% identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, with females showing higher rates of attraction without corresponding identity or exclusive behavior.[100][101] Exclusive same-sex behavior remains rare, aligning more closely with self-identification; for example, Natsal-3 found only 0.8% of women reported mostly or all same-sex partners since age 16.[96] Behavioral measures may overestimate exclusive lesbianism due to experimentation or situational factors, while self-identification better captures enduring attraction patterns, though both are subject to underreporting from social desirability bias in surveys. Concordance is highest for heterosexual identification (over 97% alignment with opposite-sex partners), but among non-heterosexual women, bisexuality accounts for much of the behavioral prevalence without exclusive lesbian identity.[102][100] Temporal trends show slight increases in both metrics, potentially reflecting reduced stigma, but the gap persists across cultures with available data.[97]Temporal and Cultural Variations
Self-reported identification as lesbian among women in the United States has hovered around 1-2% in national surveys since the early 2000s, with Gallup data indicating 1.4% of all adults in 2025. [103] This stability contrasts with broader increases in LGBTQ+ identification, which rose from 3.5% in 2012 to 9.3% in 2025, driven primarily by bisexual labels among younger cohorts. [103] [104] Among Generation Z women, lesbian identification reaches 5.4%, though the overall non-heterosexual rate for this group nears 30%, with bisexual comprising the majority at 20.7%. [105] These temporal upticks in youth identification correlate with reduced stigma and greater visibility since the 2010s, yet longitudinal studies of sexual orientation stability show that exclusive same-sex attraction in women exhibits low fluidity, with most changes involving bisexual labels rather than shifts to or from lesbianism. [106] [107] The proportion of non-heterosexual women using the specific term "lesbian" has declined, from 69% in 2014 to 38% in 2024, reflecting a pivot toward broader or fluid descriptors like bisexual or queer amid evolving cultural norms around labeling. [108] Behavioral measures, such as same-sex experiences, show less dramatic change; for instance, U.S. surveys from the 1990s to 2010s report lifetime same-sex partner rates for women at 4-6%, stable after adjusting for increased openness. [6] This suggests that temporal variations in prevalence estimates stem more from willingness to disclose and label than underlying attractions, which twin and genetic studies indicate remain consistent at 1-3% for exclusive female same-sex orientation across cohorts. [109] Cultural variations in lesbian prevalence are pronounced, with self-reports highest in liberal Western nations and near-invisible in conservative regions due to stigma and legal risks. [91] An Ipsos survey across 30 countries in 2023 found an average of 9% adult LGBTQ+ identification, including 3% as gay/lesbian, but with peaks in the Netherlands (14% total LGBTQI+) and lows under 5% in Eastern Europe and Asia. [110] [93] Dutch women report the highest rates of same-sex attraction and recent experiences globally, at 10-15%, compared to 2-5% in countries like Hungary or Indonesia, where underreporting exceeds 80% of potential cases. [111] [91] In sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, visible lesbian populations are estimated below 1%, tied to severe penalties and cultural taboos framing same-sex acts as un-Islamic or un-African, though anthropological accounts note historical tolerance in some tribal contexts without modern identity frameworks. [112] Cross-national data reveal that acceptance levels—61% in Japan versus under 10% in Nigeria—predict reporting differences, but physiological arousal studies suggest baseline female same-sex responsiveness varies minimally (15-20% non-exclusive), implying social enforcement suppresses expression more than innate prevalence. [112] [6]Health and Well-Being
Physical Health Risks and Factors
Lesbian women demonstrate elevated prevalence of several modifiable risk factors for chronic physical conditions relative to heterosexual women, including obesity, tobacco smoking, and heavy alcohol consumption. Population-based studies consistently report that lesbians have higher body mass index levels and obesity rates, with odds ratios ranging from 1.5 to 2.6 compared to heterosexual counterparts, potentially linked to differences in dietary patterns, physical activity, and attitudes toward body weight.[113] [114] These factors contribute to increased susceptibility to cardiovascular disease, as evidenced by higher reported incidence of stroke and functional limitations among lesbians in longitudinal surveys.[115] Tobacco use is markedly higher among lesbian women, with prevalence rates often exceeding 20-30% in samples versus 15-20% for heterosexual women, correlating with elevated risks for respiratory conditions such as asthma, which appears more common in sexual minority women across multiple datasets.[116] [117] Similarly, hazardous drinking patterns, including binge drinking, are more frequent, with lesbians showing 1.5-2 times greater odds, exacerbating liver disease and overall morbidity risks.[118] [114] Cancer burdens may also differ, with recent analyses indicating lesbians face disproportionate incidence rates across various types, potentially influenced by nulliparity—a factor reducing protective effects against breast cancer—and lower participation in routine screenings like mammography or Pap tests due to behavioral patterns.[119] Cardiovascular health disparities persist despite similar diagnostic rates for hypertension or heart attack in some cohorts, driven by cumulative effects of obesity, smoking, and metabolic syndrome components.[116] [120]| Risk Factor | Prevalence Comparison (Lesbians vs. Heterosexual Women) | Associated Health Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Obesity | 1.5-2.6 higher odds[121] | Cardiovascular disease, diabetes |
| Smoking | 20-30% vs. 15-20%[116] | Asthma, cancer, stroke |
| Heavy Alcohol Use | 1.5-2 higher odds[118] | Liver conditions, injury |
Mental Health Disparities
Lesbians exhibit elevated rates of several mental health conditions compared to heterosexual women, including depression, anxiety disorders, and suicidal ideation. A 2019 study analyzing data from over 1,000 women found that mostly lesbian women reported the highest levels of depression and anxiety symptoms among sexual orientation subgroups, with bisexual women showing similarly elevated physical and mental health burdens.[122] National surveys indicate that lesbian and bisexual women aged 50 and older have greater odds of poor mental health and disability relative to heterosexual peers, with diagnosed depression rates significantly higher in lesbians.[123] Meta-analyses confirm that sexual minority women, including lesbians, face heightened risks for mood disorders, with prevalence rates often exceeding those in the general female population by factors of 1.5 to 2 or more.[124] Suicidality represents a particularly stark disparity. Lifetime serious suicidal ideation is more than twice as prevalent among lesbians and women who have sex with women (WSW) than among heterosexual women, rising to over three times for bisexual women; corresponding risks for suicide attempts follow similar patterns.[125] Recent analyses of U.S. adult data show lesbian and gay individuals at three to six times greater risk of suicide after adjusting for demographics, with bisexual women often exhibiting the highest odds across ideation, planning, and attempts.[126][127] These patterns persist across age groups, including military personnel, where lesbian/gay service members report 1.8-fold higher odds of ideation compared to heterosexuals.[128] The minority stress model, which posits that chronic experiences of prejudice, discrimination, and internalized stigma contribute to these outcomes, is frequently invoked to explain disparities.[129] Empirical support includes associations between reported discrimination and higher depression/anxiety in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations.[130] However, the model's reliance on self-reported stressors and correlational data limits causal inference, as it may conflate antecedent vulnerabilities (e.g., preexisting mental health issues driving disclosure or lifestyle choices) with outcomes; critiques highlight insufficient attention to resilience factors, biological predispositions, or alternative stressors like comorbid substance use, which independently elevate risks in sexual minorities.[131] Longitudinal studies are needed to disentangle these dynamics from selection effects or reporting biases in samples drawn from advocacy-influenced cohorts.Longevity and Lifestyle Correlates
Empirical data from the Nurses' Health Study II, a prospective cohort of over 90,000 female nurses followed from 1991 to 2019, indicate that lesbian participants experienced a 20% higher mortality rate compared to heterosexual women, translating to earlier death on average, even after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and education.[132] Bisexual women in the same cohort showed a 37% higher mortality rate.[132] These disparities suggest reduced longevity among sexual minority women, though some analyses question the precision of hazard ratio interpretations due to modeling assumptions.[133] Lesbians exhibit higher prevalence of health-risk behaviors that causally contribute to premature mortality, including cigarette smoking, hazardous alcohol consumption, and obesity.[116] U.S. data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2014–2016) reveal lesbian and bisexual women are significantly more likely to smoke (23.8% vs. 13.7% for heterosexual women) and binge drink (28.2% vs. 19.8%), with lower rates of physical activity.[114] Obesity rates are elevated among lesbians (38% vs. 26% for heterosexual women), independent of socioeconomic factors in longitudinal Pittsburgh cohorts.[116] Such behaviors—smoking reduces life expectancy by up to 10 years, heavy alcohol use by 4–5 years, and obesity by 5–10 years—collectively explain substantial portions of observed mortality gaps, as these risks compound cardiovascular, cancer, and liver disease burdens.[134] Minority stress models attribute these patterns partly to discrimination, yet direct behavioral causation predominates in epidemiological evidence, with persistence across adjusted models.[132] Contrasting insurance-derived claims of longer lifespans for women in same-sex marriages lack mortality endpoints and derive from self-reported planning data, undermining their reliability against cohort studies.[135] Overall, lifestyle factors represent modifiable correlates driving longevity deficits, warranting targeted interventions beyond psychosocial attributions.Social and Cultural Dimensions
Relationships and Family Structures
Lesbian romantic relationships frequently demonstrate elevated levels of emotional expressiveness and egalitarian decision-making, with self-reported satisfaction often exceeding that of heterosexual women; one study found lesbian respondents scoring significantly higher on satisfaction metrics (Cohen's d = 0.69).[136] [137] However, longitudinal data reveal lower overall stability compared to both gay male and heterosexual unions, attributed in part to higher conflict intensity and initiation of dissolution by female partners, mirroring patterns in opposite-sex marriages where women file disproportionately.[138] [139] In a prospective analysis of cohabiting couples, 12.3% of lesbian pairs dissolved within the study period, versus 2.0% of gay male couples and 8.3% of heterosexual couples.[140] Post-legalization of same-sex marriage, divorce rates underscore this disparity: in the United Kingdom, lesbian couples accounted for 72% of same-sex divorces in 2019 despite comprising 56% of such marriages, yielding a rate approximately 2.5 times higher than for gay men.[141] [142] A 2025 analysis of marriages indicated 41% dissolution among lesbian couples within 10 years, compared to 27% for male same-sex and 22% for opposite-sex pairs.[143] Factors correlating with endurance include initial commitment levels, which predict 5% of variance in outcomes, alongside formalized legal status enhancing stability over informal cohabitation.[144] [145] Family structures among lesbians often involve higher parenthood rates than among gay men, with 62% of lesbian-headed households including children from prior heterosexual relationships, compared to 19% for heterosexual women overall.[146] Among married same-sex couples in the US as of recent estimates, 24% have adopted children—eightfold the 3% rate for married heterosexual couples—while others utilize donor insemination or surrogacy, though data on long-term relational impacts remain limited.[147] Approximately 40% of lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults report being in committed partnerships, lower than the 60% for non-LGB adults, with average relationship durations influenced by cohort and cultural acceptance trends showing no marked increase since World War II despite legalization.[148] [149] Child outcomes in lesbian families present mixed empirical findings: some analyses report equivalent or superior adjustment, with lower internalizing symptoms noted in same-sex parent households, potentially linked to higher relational satisfaction and family functioning.[150] [151] Conversely, other studies document disparities, such as lower academic and emotional scores for children in same-sex families versus intact heterosexual ones, alongside elevated instability risks affecting family cohesion.[152] [153] These variances may stem from selection effects in samples favoring stable, affluent families, as critiqued in methodological reviews, underscoring the need for population-level data over convenience samples.[154]Media Representation and Stereotypes
Portrayals of lesbians in media have historically been limited and often negative, shaped by censorship regimes such as the Motion Picture Production Code enforced from 1934 to 1968, which prohibited depictions of "sex perversion" including homosexuality.[155] Early film and television representations, when present, frequently cast lesbians as tragic figures destined for death, madness, or punishment, reinforcing stereotypes of deviance and instability.[156] For instance, in mid-20th-century literature and film adaptations, lesbian characters served as plot devices for moral cautionary tales rather than authentic explorations of identity.[157] Common stereotypes in film and television include the butch-femme dichotomy, where one partner adopts masculine traits and the other feminine, often exaggerating gender roles to mimic heterosexual dynamics for audience comprehension.[158] Hypersexualization prevails, with lesbian interactions depicted primarily for male viewers' titillation, featuring scantily clad women in brief, voyeuristic scenes rather than developed relationships.[158] Additional tropes portray lesbians as man-hating, predatory, or temporarily experimental—such as college women engaging in same-sex encounters before reverting to heterosexuality—perpetuating the notion that true lesbianism is rare or phase-like.[159] These patterns appear in surveys of media consumers, where over 30% identified portrayals as negative or male-gaze oriented.[158] In the post-1960s era, visibility increased with shows like The L Word (2004–2009), which centered lesbian lives but drew criticism for emphasizing drama, infidelity, and physical attractiveness over diverse realities.[160] Despite gains, empirical analyses reveal lesbians remain underrepresented compared to gay men, comprising fewer lead roles and often confined to side characters in ensemble casts.[161] Qualitative studies indicate that stereotypical depictions mislead public perceptions, associating lesbians with pathology or exoticism rather than everyday experiences.[156] Critiques highlight how such representations, influenced by commercial incentives and heteronormative biases in production, fail to reflect behavioral data on stable same-sex attractions among women.[162]Political Activism and Ideological Roles
Lesbian political activism emerged prominently in the mid-20th century, with the founding of the Daughters of Bilitis in 1955 as the first U.S. organization dedicated to lesbian civil and political rights, focusing on education and social support amid widespread criminalization of homosexuality.[163] In the UK, the Minorities Research Group formed in 1963 as the initial lesbian social and political entity, publishing the journal Arena Three to advocate for visibility and rights.[164] These early efforts preceded broader gay liberation, emphasizing discreet advocacy due to legal and social risks, including police raids and psychiatric pathologization. The 1970s marked a surge in lesbian-specific activism intertwined with second-wave feminism, as lesbians faced exclusion from both mainstream women's liberation groups—often deemed too radical or divisive—and male-dominated gay rights movements.[81] This led to lesbian feminism, which positioned lesbianism as a political choice against patriarchy, exemplified by the Radicalesbians' 1970 manifesto "The Woman-Identified Woman," defining separatism as withdrawal from male-centered institutions to foster women-only spaces.[165] Lesbian separatism gained traction, with communities establishing rural collectives and cultural networks, though it fractured over debates on political versus personal autonomy, contributing to internal schisms by the late 1970s.[166] Participation in events like the 1987 March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights highlighted lesbians' role in mass mobilization, drawing over 200,000 attendees to demand federal protections.[167] Survey data indicate that self-identified lesbians, like broader LGBTQ populations, predominantly align with liberal ideologies, with approximately 50% of LGBT adults identifying as liberal, 37% moderate, and only 12% conservative as of 2013, patterns persisting in later polls showing 58% liberal among LGBTQ Americans.[168] [169] Lesbians have been overrepresented in feminist movements, including radical variants, with studies noting higher participation in pro-feminist activism compared to heterosexual women.[170] However, a minority engage conservative politics, such as Fox News commentator Tammy Bruce, nominated in 2025 for a U.S. State Department role by President-elect Trump, exemplifying right-leaning lesbians critiquing "woke" cultural shifts.[171] In contemporary debates, many lesbians have assumed ideological roles in gender-critical feminism, often labeled "trans-exclusionary radical feminism" (TERF) by critics, prioritizing biological sex-based rights and spaces amid tensions with transgender inclusion in women's and lesbian contexts.[172] This stance, rooted in 1970s separatism, manifests in advocacy against policies allowing male-bodied individuals in female prisons or sports, with surveys and anecdotes highlighting lesbians' disproportionate involvement due to concerns over eroded same-sex attraction definitions.[173] While mainstream LGBTQ organizations often marginalize such views, they reflect causal priorities of preserving sex-based protections, evidenced by groups like the UK's Lesbian Project formed in response to perceived erasure.[174] Conservative lesbians, though fewer, leverage alliances with right-wing platforms on free speech and anti-censorship, as seen in Log Cabin Republicans' efforts to integrate LGBT voices into GOP policy.[175] These roles underscore lesbians' outsized influence in ideological battles over sex, gender, and autonomy, often challenging dominant progressive narratives within broader movements.Global and Non-Western Perspectives
Middle East and Islamic Societies
In Islamic doctrine, female same-sex relations (known as sihaq or musahaqah) are considered sinful and prohibited, drawing from interpretations of hadiths rather than explicit Quranic verses, with punishments typically involving discretionary ta'zir penalties such as flogging rather than fixed hadd sanctions like stoning applied to male homosexuality.[176] Medieval Arabic texts, including medical and literary works from the 9th century onward, acknowledged lesbian practices but framed them as pathological or licentious, sometimes tolerating them privately to avert greater male-female illicit acts, though public condemnation prevailed.[177] Contemporary legal frameworks in Middle Eastern Islamic societies criminalize lesbianism under Sharia-influenced penal codes or secular laws influenced by Islamic norms, with penalties ranging from imprisonment to corporal punishment. In Iran, Article 130 of the Islamic Penal Code prescribes 100 lashes for mature women engaging in lesbian acts, with repeat offenses potentially escalating to execution under judicial discretion.[178] Saudi Arabia applies uncodified Sharia provisions prohibiting same-sex relations, resulting in flogging or, in severe cases, execution for women, though documented female cases more commonly involve imprisonment or exile.[179] The United Arab Emirates' federal law punishes female same-sex acts with up to five years' imprisonment, amended in 2005 to explicitly include women.[180] Yemen's penal code imposes up to three years' imprisonment, while Iraq's 2024 law mandates 10-15 years for same-sex relationships, affecting women disproportionately through family-mediated enforcement.[181] Jordan remains an outlier, with no explicit criminalization of consensual same-sex acts since 1951, though social and familial reprisals persist.[182] Social attitudes enforce severe stigma, often leading to honor-based violence, forced marriages, or psychiatric "treatment," with lesbian women facing disownment, acid attacks, or extrajudicial killings by relatives to preserve family reputation.[183] Underground networks exist in urban centers like Beirut, where organizations such as Helem provide discreet support since 1990s, but participants risk entrapment via digital surveillance or informant betrayals prevalent in countries like Egypt and the UAE.[184][185] In Iran, authorities promote gender reassignment surgeries for lesbians as a Sharia-compliant alternative to same-sex relations, with over 4,000 such procedures reported annually as of 2018, often coerced.[186] Activism remains marginal and hazardous, as evidenced by 2022 death sentences for Iranian LGBT advocates Zahra Seddiqi-Hamedani and Elham Choubdar on fabricated charges tied to advocacy.[187] Empirical surveys indicate acceptance rates below 5% across the region, correlating with religious adherence and patriarchal structures prioritizing procreation and gender segregation.[188]Africa and Indigenous Contexts
In pre-colonial African societies, woman-to-woman marriages were documented in over 40 ethnic groups, including the Igbo of Nigeria, Nuer of South Sudan, and Azande of Central Africa, where a woman could assume the role of "husband" to another woman for purposes such as lineage continuation, inheritance, or economic alliance when no male heirs were available.[189][190] These unions often involved the "wife" bearing children through relations with men selected for procreation, while the emotional and social bonds between the women provided stability; sexual intimacy between the women occurred in some cases, though primary motivations were pragmatic rather than erotic.[191] Among the Igbo, such marriages dated back centuries and allowed "wives" greater sexual autonomy, including discreet same-sex relations alongside male partners for reproduction.[192] However, these practices were not uniform across Africa, and explicit evidence of female same-sex attraction independent of social utility remains sparse, with colonial-era records often interpreting them through European lenses of deviance.[193] Colonial imposition of European norms, including Christian and Islamic influences, stigmatized these arrangements, leading to their decline and the criminalization of same-sex acts in most African penal codes by the 20th century; today, female same-sex relations face severe legal penalties in countries like Uganda (life imprisonment under 2023 anti-homosexuality laws) and Nigeria (up to 14 years), with social ostracism and violence prevalent.[194][195] Anthropological studies note that while pre-colonial tolerance varied—some societies integrated gender-variant roles in spiritual contexts, as with sangomas (traditional healers) in southern Africa—post-independence governments have invoked "un-African" rhetoric to justify repression, despite historical precedents.[196] Empirical data from surveys indicate low visibility of lesbian identities due to enforcement risks, with organizations reporting undercounted incidences of corrective rape and forced marriages targeting women perceived as masculine or non-conforming.[197] In indigenous North American contexts, female same-sex relations were occasionally documented but typically intertwined with gender-variant roles rather than isolated erotic preference; "manly-hearted" women or female berdaches—such as among the Kutenai tribe, where a woman named Qánqon in the early 19th century lived as a hunter, warrior, and prophet, forming unions with other women—adopted male attire and duties, often partnering with feminine women in socially recognized pairings.[198][199] These roles, observed in over 150 tribes pre-contact, emphasized spiritual balance and communal utility over individual identity, with berdaches (a term now critiqued as colonial) fulfilling intermediary functions like mediation or healing; sexual relations with same-sex partners were noted but secondary to gender inversion.[200] Accounts from tribes like the Navajo (nádleehí) or Lakota describe rare female variants who married women, but tolerance hinged on perceived supernatural gifts, not endorsement of homosexuality per se, and many societies prioritized reproduction, viewing exclusive same-sex bonds as disruptive unless ritually framed.[201] Post-colonial assimilation and missionary influences eroded these traditions, reducing documentation and fostering modern revivals under terms like "two-spirit," which blend historical roles with contemporary LGBTQ+ frameworks despite anthropological debates over anachronism.[202] Among other indigenous peoples, such as Pacific Islanders or Australian Aboriginal groups, evidence of female same-sex practices is even scarcer and often mediated by kinship systems; for instance, some Polynesian societies recognized fa'afafine (typically male-bodied) but less so female equivalents, with same-sex bonds emerging in all-female ceremonial contexts rather than normative partnerships.[203] Overall, indigenous acceptance was pragmatic and role-based, not ideological, contrasting modern Western conceptions of lesbianism as innate orientation; colonial records, while biased toward pathologization, confirm variability without widespread celebration of exclusive female same-sex attraction.[204]Asia and Traditional Views
In traditional Chinese society, female same-sex eroticism was documented in literature from the Shang and Zhou dynasties onward, though far less prominently than male homosexuality, often framed as romantic attachments or "female romances" that did not directly challenge Confucian imperatives for procreation and family continuity.[205] Confucian doctrine viewed such relations critically when they excluded men from sexual access or deterred women from fulfilling roles in patrilineal extension, positioning them as a potential threat to social order rather than a celebrated norm.[58] Historical records, including folklore and novels, occasionally depicted women forming bonds amid polygamous structures, but these were typically subordinated to heterosexual marriage obligations, with little evidence of institutional tolerance or ritual acceptance comparable to male practices. In modern Chinese contexts, the slang term "蕾絲邊" (léi sī biān), a phono-semantic matching of the English "lesbian," is commonly used in informal settings.[206][207] In Japan, traditional views on female same-sex relations prior to the modern era were largely unarticulated in dominant cultural narratives, which focused on male homosexuality (danshoku or shudo) among samurai and monks, reflecting Shinto and Buddhist influences that did not explicitly condemn non-procreative acts but prioritized lineage preservation.[208] Lesbianism, when referenced in Edo-period (1603–1868) erotica or theater, was often portrayed as transient or playful within female-segregated spaces like brothels or households, without dedicated terminology or social roles until the early 20th century, suggesting it was tolerated informally but invisible in official discourse due to patriarchal controls on women's sexuality.[209] Sources indicate no legal prohibitions, yet Confucian-influenced ethics emphasized women's marital duties, rendering sustained female pairings marginal or concealed to avoid disrupting family alliances.[210] Ancient Indian texts and art reveal more explicit acknowledgments of female same-sex interactions, with the Kamasutra (circa 400 BCE–200 CE) describing acts between women as permissible extensions of sensual exploration, not inherently sinful, alongside temple carvings at Khajuraho (9th–12th centuries CE) depicting erotic embraces among women.[211] Hindu scriptures tolerated diverse expressions within a framework of dharma, where such relations were neither criminalized nor central to identity, often integrated into broader cosmologies of fluidity (e.g., deities like Ardhanarishvara embodying dual genders), though empirical evidence suggests they remained peripheral to reproductive norms in caste and kinship systems.[212] Colonial-era interpretations later amplified perceptions of pre-modern acceptance, but primary sources confirm variability, with Vedic and epic literature prioritizing heterosexual unions for societal continuity over non-procreative variants.[213] Across Southeast Asian traditions, female homosexuality appears sporadically in ethnographic accounts of animist and Buddhist societies, where gender-variant roles (e.g., bissu shamans in Sulawesi) coexisted with fluid sexual practices, but specific lesbian pairings were rarely formalized, often subsumed under communal rituals or tolerated as long as they did not conflict with agrarian family structures.[214] In regions like Thailand and Indonesia, pre-colonial folklore hints at female bonds in matrilineal contexts, yet patriarchal overlays from Indianized kingdoms emphasized fertility rites, rendering same-sex relations anecdotal rather than doctrinally opposed or endorsed.[215] Overall, traditional Asian views privileged empirical familial imperatives over individual eroticism, with female same-sex activity documented but marginalized, reflecting causal priorities of demographic stability in agrarian polities.[216]Controversies and Critical Perspectives
Innateness vs. Social Construction Debates
Empirical studies on the origins of female same-sex attraction reveal a multifaceted etiology, with evidence supporting both biological predispositions and environmental influences, though genetic and prenatal factors account for a substantial portion of variance. Twin studies indicate moderate heritability for lesbian orientation, with monozygotic twin concordance rates ranging from 31.6% to 65.8%, compared to 16-30% for dizygotic twins, suggesting genetic contributions estimated at 18-48%.[217][218][219] Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) further identify polygenic influences, explaining 8-25% of variance in same-sex behavior, without a singular deterministic "lesbian gene," underscoring complex, non-specific genetic architecture.[24][220] Neuroimaging research points to structural and functional brain differences in lesbians, including reduced grey matter in the perirhinal cortex and temporo-basal regions, alongside altered cerebral asymmetry and connectivity patterns that partially align with male-typical features in heterosexual men.[221][38][222] Prenatal hormone exposure provides indirect support for innateness, as lesbians exhibit markers of elevated androgen levels, such as lower 2D:4D digit ratios and patterns observed in conditions like congenital adrenal hyperplasia, which correlate with non-heterosexual orientations.[30][223] These biological indicators imply that sexual orientation emerges early, potentially fixed by developmental windows, challenging purely volitional or learned models. Counterarguments favoring social construction emphasize historical variability in female same-sex relations and greater fluidity in women's attractions compared to men's. Longitudinal data show women are more prone to shifts in sexual identity and attractions over time, with situational flexibility enabling changes not typically seen in males, as evidenced by studies tracking self-reported orientations across decades.[224] Proponents argue that cultural contexts, including feminist movements and identity politics, have amplified lesbian identification, with historical records showing same-sex bonds often framed as romantic friendships rather than innate eroticism, suggesting categorization as "lesbian" is partly a modern construct.[225][226] Evolutionary biology complicates strict innateness claims, as lesbianism reduces direct reproduction without clear fitness benefits, posing a paradox under natural selection; proposed resolutions like sexually antagonistic genes—where alleles boosting female fertility harm male relatives' orientation—remain speculative and lack robust confirmation for females, unlike stronger fraternal birth order effects in males.[227][228] Overall, while biological data predominate in explaining stable same-sex attraction, female-specific fluidity and sociocultural amplification indicate that environment modulates expression, rendering full determinism implausible and highlighting interactions over monocausal theories. Academic sources advancing social construction often reflect ideological priors favoring malleability, yet empirical heritability estimates and prenatal correlates provide firmer grounds for partial innateness.[229][23]Critiques of Identity Politics
Some lesbians and feminist scholars argue that identity politics, particularly within the broader LGBTQ+ framework, erodes the specificity of lesbian identity by prioritizing fluid, gender-inclusive categories like "queer" over sex-based same-sex attraction. This shift, they contend, marginalizes lesbians by subsuming their experiences under expansive umbrellas that dilute biological realities of female homosexuality.[230][231] For instance, the rebranding of lesbians as "queer women" or non-binary identities discourages exclusive same-sex orientation, framing it as exclusionary or transphobic.[232] Critics highlight how this form of identity politics pressures lesbians to redefine their attractions to include trans-identified males, effectively redefining homosexuality as same-gender rather than same-sex. Organizations like the LGB Alliance, founded in 2019, emerged in response to what co-founders described as the "lie of gender identity" infiltrating gay and lesbian advocacy, arguing it undermines protections for same-sex attracted individuals by conflating sex with self-identified gender.[233][234] Lesbian activists such as Julie Bindel have similarly critiqued the expansion of LGBTQIA+ acronyms, asserting that transgender ideology introduces contradictions that sideline lesbian and gay rights in favor of gender self-identification, often resembling a form of compelled speech or association.[235][236] Additionally, internal lesbian feminist critiques target earlier manifestations of identity politics, such as "political lesbianism" from the 1970s radical feminism, which posited lesbianism as a choice to reject patriarchy rather than an innate orientation. Detractors, including some contemporary lesbians, view this as coercive and biphobic, reducing sexual orientation to ideology and alienating those with genuine same-sex attractions.[237][238] These perspectives emphasize that identity politics, whether queer-inclusive or separatist, often prioritizes group narratives over individual empirical realities of attraction and biology, leading to intra-community divisions.[239]Tensions with Contemporary Gender Movements
Some lesbians have expressed concerns that contemporary gender ideology, which posits that transgender women—biological males who identify as female—are indistinguishable from biological females, undermines the definition of lesbianism as exclusive same-sex attraction between females. Traditional definitions, rooted in female homosexuality and supported by authoritative sources such as the American Psychological Association—which describes lesbians as women attracted to women—reject the notion that men, including transgender women, can identify as lesbians.[1] This tension arises from the assertion that lesbians, by orientation, are not attracted to male biology, yet face accusations of transphobia or bigotry for excluding transgender women from dating pools or sexual partnerships.[240] For instance, the term "cotton ceiling," coined by transgender activist Imogen Binnie in 2012, analogizes the barriers transgender women face in accessing sexual relationships with lesbians to workplace discrimination, implying that refusal equates to prejudice against transgender validity.[240] Critics among lesbians argue this framework coerces them into validating gender identity over biological sex, with reports of online harassment, including threats and shunning, for maintaining boundaries based on genital configuration or reproductive dimorphism.[240] These conflicts have manifested in organized protests and separations from broader LGBTQ+ coalitions. In July 2018, the group Get the L Out disrupted London Pride, halting the parade to demand the removal of transgender activism from lesbian spaces, contending that it erases lesbian-specific rights by redefining same-sex orientation to encompass opposite-sex attraction under gender terms.[241] The activists carried banners stating "Transactivism Erases Lesbians" and argued that Pride events had shifted from celebrating homosexuality to prioritizing gender self-identification, which they view as incompatible with female-only spaces and attractions.[242] Similar disruptions occurred at other Prides, such as Cardiff in 2022, where police removed Get the L Out protesters for highlighting what they described as misogynistic elements in transgender inclusion.[243] A 2021 survey by Get the L Out, titled "Lesbians at Ground Zero," documented experiences of over 200 lesbians feeling marginalized within LGBTQ+ structures due to pressure to affirm transgender women as potential partners.[244] In response to these dynamics, the LGB Alliance was founded in October 2019 by lesbians and gay men, including barrister Allison Bailey, to advocate for same-sex attracted individuals separately from transgender issues.[245] The group cites the "lie of gender identity" as eroding homosexual rights, particularly by confusing youth about innate sexual orientation through narratives that prioritize self-identified gender over biological sex.[233] Founders referenced UK charity Stonewall's policy shift in the mid-2010s, which banned internal debate on sex-based rights, as a catalyst for separation, aiming to restore focus on empirical same-sex attraction without conflation with gender dysphoria or transition.[246] By 2021, the Charity Commission granted LGB Alliance charitable status, affirming its purposes aligned with advancing LGB equality amid these ideological rifts.[247] Broader critiques from lesbian feminists highlight causal mismatches: gender movements, often led by male-identifying individuals, impose access to female spaces and relationships, disregarding lesbians' consistent reports of non-attraction to male physiology, as evidenced in dating app exclusions or personal testimonies.[240] Empirical data on sexual orientation, such as twin studies showing heritability tied to sex chromosomes rather than fluid identity, underpin arguments that redefining lesbianism ignores biological realities in favor of social constructs.[234] While some sources frame these positions as fringe or transphobic, lesbian-led groups maintain they defend orientation integrity against erasure, with incidents like physical confrontations at 2022 pride events underscoring escalating intra-community hostilities.[248]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E8%95%BE%E7%B9%AA%E9%82%8A
.jpg)
