Hubbry Logo
SynthesizerSynthesizerMain
Open search
Synthesizer
Community hub
Synthesizer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Synthesizer
Synthesizer
Synthesizer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Early Minimoog by R.A. Moog Inc. (c. 1970)

A synthesizer (also synthesiser or synth) is an electronic musical instrument that generates audio signals. Synthesizers typically create sounds by generating waveforms through methods including subtractive synthesis, additive synthesis and frequency modulation synthesis. These sounds may be altered by components such as filters, which cut or boost frequencies; envelopes, which control articulation, or how notes begin and end; and low-frequency oscillators, which modulate parameters such as pitch, volume, or filter characteristics affecting timbre. Synthesizers are typically played with keyboards or controlled by sequencers, software or other instruments, and may be synchronized to other equipment via MIDI.

Jon Appleton, "Sashasonjon" (1984) from the Four Fantasies for Synclavier
Composed and performed on the Synclavier II in the Bregman Electronic Music Studio, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Synthesizer-like instruments emerged in the United States in the mid-20th century with instruments such as the RCA Mark II, which was controlled with punch cards and used hundreds of vacuum tubes. The Moog synthesizer, developed by Robert Moog and first sold in 1964, is credited for pioneering concepts such as voltage-controlled oscillators, envelopes, noise generators, filters, and sequencers. In 1970, the smaller, cheaper Minimoog standardized synthesizers as self-contained instruments with built-in keyboards, unlike the larger modular synthesizers before it.

In 1978, Sequential Circuits released the Prophet-5, which used microprocessors to allow users to store sounds for the first time. MIDI, a standardized means of synchronizing electronic instruments, was introduced in 1982 and remains an industry standard. The Yamaha DX7, launched in 1983, was a major success and popularized digital synthesis. Software synthesizers now can be run as plug-ins or embedded on microchips. In the 21st century, analog synthesizers returned to popularity with the advent of cheaper manufacturing and the increasing popularity of synthwave music starting in the 2010s.[1]

Synthesizers were initially viewed as avant-garde, valued by the 1960s psychedelic and countercultural scenes but with little perceived commercial potential. Switched-On Bach (1968), a bestselling album of Bach compositions arranged for synthesizer by Wendy Carlos, took synthesizers to the mainstream. They were adopted by electronic acts and pop and rock groups in the 1960s and 1970s and were widely used in 1980s music. Sampling, introduced with the Fairlight synthesizer in 1979, has influenced genres such as electronic and hip hop music. Today, the synthesizer is used in nearly every genre of music and is considered one of the most important instruments in the music industry. According to Fact in 2016, "The synthesizer is as important, and as ubiquitous, in modern music today as the human voice."[2]

History

[edit]

Precursors

[edit]

As electricity became more widely available, the early 20th century saw the invention of electronic musical instruments including the Telharmonium, Trautonium, ondes Martenot and theremin.[3] In the late 1930s, the Hammond Organ Company built the Novachord, a large instrument powered by 72 voltage-controlled amplifiers and 146 vacuum tubes.[4] In 1948, the Canadian engineer Hugh Le Caine completed the electronic sackbut, a precursor to voltage-controlled synthesizers, with keyboard sensitivity allowing for vibrato, glissando, and attack control.[3]

In 1957, Harry Olson and Herbert Belar completed the RCA Mark II Sound Synthesizer at the RCA laboratories in Princeton, New Jersey. The instrument read punched paper tape that controlled an analog synthesizer containing 750 vacuum tubes. It was acquired by the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center and used almost exclusively by Milton Babbitt, a composer at Princeton University.[3]

1960s: Early years

[edit]
Robert Moog with Moog synthesizers. Many of Moog's inventions, such as voltage-controlled oscillators, became standard in synthesizers.

The authors of Analog Days define "the early years of the synthesizer" as between 1964 and the mid-1970s, beginning with the debut of the Moog synthesizer.[5]: 7  Designed by the American engineer Robert Moog, the instrument was a modular synthesizer system composed of numerous separate electronic modules, each capable of generating, shaping, or controlling a sound depending on how each module is connected to other modules by patch cables.[6] Moog developed a means of controlling pitch through voltage, the voltage-controlled oscillator.[7] This, along with Moog components such as envelopes, noise generators, filters, and sequencers, became standard components in synthesizers.[8][5]

Around the same period, the American engineer Don Buchla created the Buchla Modular Electronic Music System.[9] Instead of a conventional keyboard, Buchla's system used touchplates which transmitted control voltages depending on finger position and force.[5] However, the Moog's keyboard made it more accessible and marketable to musicians, and keyboards became the standard means of controlling synthesizers.[5] Moog and Buchla initially avoided the word synthesizer for their instruments, as it was associated with the RCA synthesizer; however, by the 1970s, it had become the standard term.[5]

1970s: Portability, polyphony and patch memory

[edit]

In 1970, Moog launched a cheaper, smaller synthesizer, the Minimoog.[10][11] It was the first synthesizer sold in music stores,[5] and was more practical for live performance. It standardized the concept of synthesizers as self-contained instruments with built-in keyboards.[12][13] In the early 1970s, the British composer Ken Freeman introduced the first string synthesizer, designed to emulate string sections.[14]

The Minimoog, introduced in 1970, was the first synthesizer sold in music stores.

After retail stores started selling synthesizers in 1971, other synthesizer companies were established, including ARP in the US and EMS in the UK.[5] ARP's products included the ARP 2600, which folded into a carrying case and had built-in speakers, and the Odyssey, a rival to the Minimoog.[5] The less expensive EMS synthesizers were used by European art rock and progressive rock acts including Brian Eno and Pink Floyd.[5] Designs for synthesizers appeared in the amateur electronics market, such as a design published in Practical Electronics in 1973.[15] By the mid-1970s, ARP was the world's largest synthesizer manufacturer,[5] though it closed in 1981.[16]

Early synthesizers were monophonic, meaning they could only play one note at a time. Some of the earliest commercial polyphonic synthesizers were created by the American engineer Tom Oberheim,[9] such as the OB-X (1979).[5] In 1978, the American company Sequential Circuits released the Prophet-5, the first fully programmable polyphonic synthesizer.[8]: 93  Whereas previous synthesizers required users to adjust cables and knobs to change sounds, with no guarantee of exactly recreating a sound,[5] the Prophet-5 used microprocessors to store sounds in patch memory.[17] This facilitated a move from synthesizers creating unpredictable sounds to producing "a standard package of familiar sounds".[5]: 385 

1980s: Digital technology

[edit]

The synthesizer market grew dramatically in the 1980s.[8]: 57  1982 saw the introduction of MIDI, a standardized means of synchronizing electronic instruments; it remains an industry standard.[18] An influential sampling synthesizer, the Fairlight CMI, was released in 1979,[17] with the ability to record and play back samples at different pitches.[19] Though its high price made it inaccessible to amateurs, it was adopted by high-profile pop musicians including Kate Bush and Peter Gabriel. The success of the Fairlight drove competition, improving sampling technology and lowering prices.[19] Early competing samplers included the E-mu Emulator in 1981[19] and the Akai S-series in 1985.[20]

The Yamaha DX7, released in 1983, was the first commercially successful digital synthesizer and was widely used in 1980s pop music.

In 1983, Yamaha released the first commercially successful digital synthesizer, the Yamaha DX7.[21] Based on frequency modulation (FM) synthesis developed by the Stanford University engineer John Chowning,[22] the DX7 was characterized by its "harsh", "glassy" and "chilly" sounds, compared to the "warm" and "fuzzy" sounds of analog synthesis.[2] The DX7 was the first synthesizer to sell more than 100,000 units[8]: 57 and remains one of the bestselling in history.[21][23] It was widely used in 1980s pop music.[24]

Digital synthesizers typically contained preset sounds emulating acoustic instruments, with algorithms controlled with menus and buttons.[5] The Synclavier, made with FM technology licensed from Yamaha, offered features such as 16-bit sampling and digital recording. With a starting price of $13,000, its use was limited to universities, studios and wealthy artists.[25][26] The Roland D-50 (1987) blended Roland's linear arithmetic algorithm with samples, and was the first mass-produced synthesizer with built-in digital effects such as delay, reverb and chorus.[8]: 63  In 1988, the Japanese manufacturer Korg released the M1, a digital synthesizer workstation featuring sampled transients and loops.[27] With more than 250,000 units sold, it remains the bestselling synthesizer in history.[27] The advent of digital synthesizers led to a downturn in interest in analog synthesizers in the following decade.[8]: 59 

1990s–present: Software synthesizers and analog revival

[edit]
Main article: Analog revival

1997 saw the release of ReBirth by Propellerhead Software and Reality by Seer Systems, the first software synthesizers that could be played in real time via MIDI.[8] In 1999, an update to the music software Cubase allowed users to run software instruments (including synthesizers) as plug-ins, triggering a wave of new software instruments.[28] Propellerhead's Reason, released in 2000, introduced an array of recognizable virtual studio equipment.[28]

The market for patchable and modular synthesizers rebounded in the late 1990s.[8]: 32  In the 2000s, older analog synthesizers regained popularity, sometimes selling for much more than their original prices.[29] In the 2010s, new, affordable analog synthesizers were introduced by companies including Moog, Korg, Arturia and Dave Smith Instruments. The renewed interest is credited to the appeal of imperfect "organic" sounds and simpler interfaces, and modern surface-mount technology making analog synthesizers cheaper and faster to manufacture.[29]

Impact

[edit]

Early synthesizers were viewed as avant-garde, valued by the 1960s psychedelic and counter-cultural scenes for their ability to make new sounds, but with little perceived commercial potential. Switched-On Bach (1968), a bestselling album of Bach compositions arranged for Moog synthesizer by Wendy Carlos, demonstrated that synthesizers could be more than "random noise machines",[6] taking them to the mainstream.[5] However, debates were held about the appropriateness of synthesizers in baroque music, and according to the Guardian they were quickly abandoned in "serious classical circles".[30]

Today, the synthesizer is one of the most important instruments in the music industry,[31] used in nearly every genre.[5]: 7  It is considered by the authors of Analog Days as "the only innovation that can stand alongside the electric guitar as a great new instrument of the age of electricity ... Both led to new forms of music, and both had massive popular appeal."[5]: 7  According to Fact in 2016, "The synthesizer is as important, and as ubiquitous, in modern music today as the human voice."[2]

Rock

[edit]
Keyboardist Keith Emerson performing with a Moog synthesizer in 1970

The Moog was adopted by 1960s rock acts including the Doors, the Grateful Dead, the Rolling Stones, the Beatles, and Keith Emerson.[32] Emerson was the first major rock musician to perform with the Moog and it became a trademark of his performances, helping take his band Emerson, Lake & Palmer to global stardom. According to Analog Days, the likes of Emerson, with his Moog performances, "did for the keyboard what Jimi Hendrix did for the guitar".[5]: 200  String synthesizers were used by 1970s progressive rock bands including Camel, Caravan, Electric Light Orchestra, Gentle Giant and Renaissance.[14]

The portable Minimoog (1970), much smaller than the modular synthesizers before it, made synthesizers more common in live performance.[13] Early synthesizers could only play one note at a time, making them suitable for basslines, leads and solos.[33] With the rise of polyphonic synthesizers in the 1970s and 1980s, "the keyboard in rock once more started to revert to the background, to be used for fills and atmosphere rather than for soloing".[5]: 207  Queen included statements in their 1970s album notes specifying that no synthesisers had been used, but added them in their 1980 album The Game.[34][35]

African-American music

[edit]

The Minimoog took a place in mainstream African-American music, most notably in the work of Stevie Wonder,[5] and in jazz, such as the work of Sun Ra.[33] In the late 1970s and the early 1980s, the Minimoog was widely used in the emerging disco genre by artists including Abba and Giorgio Moroder.[33] Sampling, introduced with the Fairlight synthesizer in 1979, has influenced all genres of music[7] and had a major influence on the development of electronic and hip hop music.[36][37]

Electronic music

[edit]

In the 1970s, electronic music composers such as Jean Michel Jarre[38] and Isao Tomita[39][40][41] released successful synthesizer-led instrumental albums. This influenced the emergence of synth-pop from the late 1970s to the early 1980s. The work of German krautrock bands such as Kraftwerk[42] and Tangerine Dream, British acts such as John Foxx, Gary Numan and David Bowie, African-American acts such as George Clinton and Zapp, and Japanese electronic acts such as Yellow Magic Orchestra and Kitaro were influential in the development of the genre.[31]

The sequencer-based Roland TB-303 (1981), in conjunction with the Roland TR-808 and TR-909 drum machines, became a foundation of electronic dance music genres such as house and techno when producers acquired cheap second-hand units later in the decade.[43] The authors of Analog Days connect the synthesizer's origins in 1960s psychedelia to the raves and British "second summer of love" of the 1980s and the club scenes of the 1990s and 2000s.[5]: 321 

Pop

[edit]

Gary Numan's 1979 hits "Are 'Friends' Electric?" and "Cars" made heavy use of synthesizers.[44][45] OMD's "Enola Gay" (1980) used distinctive electronic percussion and a synthesized melody. Soft Cell used a synthesized melody on their 1981 hit "Tainted Love".[31] Nick Rhodes, the keyboardist of Duran Duran, used synthesizers including the Roland Jupiter-4 and Jupiter-8.[46] Chart hits include Depeche Mode's "Just Can't Get Enough" (1981),[31] the Human League's "Don't You Want Me"[47] and works by Ultravox.[31]

In the 1980s, digital synthesizers were widely used in pop music.[24] The Yamaha DX7, released in 1983, became a pop staple, used on songs by A-ha, Kenny Loggins, Kool & the Gang.[2] Its "E PIANO 1" preset became particularly famous,[2] especially for power ballads,[48] and was used by artists including Whitney Houston, Chicago,[48] Prince,[24] Phil Collins, Luther Vandross, Billy Ocean,[2] and Celine Dion.[49] Korg M1 presets were widely used in 1990s house music, beginning with Madonna's 1990 single "Vogue".[50]

Film and television

[edit]

Synthesizers are common in film and television soundtracks.[5]: 273  In 1969, Mort Garson used a Moog to compose a soundtrack for the televised footage of the Apollo 11 moonwalk, creating a link between electronic music and space in the American popular imagination.[51] ARP synthesizers were used to create sound effects for the 1977 science fiction films Close Encounters of the Third Kind[5]: 9  and Star Wars, including the "voice" of the robot R2-D2.[5]: 273 

In the 1970s and 1980s, synthesizers were used in the scores for thrillers and horror films including A Clockwork Orange (1971), Apocalypse Now (1979), The Fog (1980) and Manhunter (1986). Brad Fiedel used a Prophet synthesizer to record the soundtrack for The Terminator (1984),[52] and the filmmaker John Carpenter used them extensively for his soundtracks.[53] Synthesizers were used to create themes for television shows including Knight Rider (1982), Twin Peaks (1990) and Stranger Things (2016).[54]

Jobs

[edit]

"When we did a rerecorded version [of 'Video Killed the Radio Star'] for Top of the Pops, the Musicians' Union bloke said, 'If I think you're making strings sounds out of a synthesiser, I'm going to have you. "Video Killed the Radio Star" is putting musicians out of business.'"

— Geoff Downes, keyboardist for synth-pop and new wave band the Buggles[55]

The rise of the synthesizer led to major changes in the music industry, including job displacement, comparable to the 1920s arrival of sound in film, which put live musicians accompanying silent films out of work.[56] With its ability to imitate instruments such as strings and horns, the synthesizer threatened the jobs of session musicians by allowing one keyboardist or music programmer to produce the same range of sounds as an entire orchestra. For a period, the Moog was banned from use in union work, a restriction negotiated by the American Federation of Musicians (AFM).[5] Robert Moog felt that the AFM had not realized that his instrument had to be studied like any other, and instead imagined that "all the sounds that musicians could make somehow existed in the Moog — all you had to do was push a button that said 'Jascha Heifetz' and out would come the most fantastic violin player".[57]

The musician Walter Sear persuaded the AFM that the synthesizer demanded skill, and the category of "synthesizer player" was accepted into the union. However, players were subject to "suspicion and hostility" for years.[5]: 149  In 1982, following a tour by Barry Manilow using synthesizers instead of an orchestra, the British Musicians' Union attempted to ban synthesizers, attracting controversy.[58] In the 1980s, a few musicians skilled at programming the Yamaha DX7 found employment creating sounds for other acts.[59]

Sound synthesis

[edit]
In subtractive synthesis, complex waveforms are generated by oscillators and then shaped with filters to remove or boost specific frequencies.

Synthesizers generate audio through various forms of analog and digital synthesis.

Components

[edit]

Oscillators

[edit]
Oscillator wave shape example
Sawtooth wave compared to triangle wave
An example of two identical groups of notes being played first by a sawtooth oscillator, and then by a triangle oscillator.

Oscillators produce waveforms (such as sawtooth, sine, or pulse waves) with different timbres.[8]

Voltage-controlled amplifiers

[edit]

Voltage-controlled amplifiers (VCAs) control the volume or gain of the audio signal. VCAs can be modulated by other components, such as LFOs and envelopes.[8] A VCA is a preamp that boosts (amplifies) the electronic signal before passing it on to an external or built-in power amplifier, as well as a means to control its amplitude (volume) using an attenuator. The gain of the VCA is affected by a control voltage (CV), coming from an envelope generator, an LFO, the keyboard or some other source.[69]

Envelopes

[edit]
Main article: Envelope (music)
Schematic of ADSR

Envelopes control how sounds change over time. They may control parameters such as amplitude (volume), filters (frequencies), or pitch. The most common envelope is the ADSR (attack, decay, sustain, release) envelope:[8]

  • Attack is the time taken for initial run-up of level from nil to peak, beginning when the note is triggered.
  • Decay is the time taken for the subsequent run down from the attack level to the designated sustain level.
  • Sustain is the level during the main sequence of the sound's duration, until the key is released.
  • Release is the time taken for the level to decay from the sustain level to zero after the key is released.
ADSR envelope example
ADSR envelope with sawtooth wave
An ADSR envelope applied to note amplitude.
Problems playing this file? See media help.

Low-frequency oscillators

[edit]
Main article: Low-frequency oscillation

Low-frequency oscillators (LFOs) produce waveforms used to modulate parameters, such as the pitch of oscillators (producing vibrato).[8]

Filters

[edit]
Main article: Audio filter

Filters remove frequencies from the audio signal, similarly to equalization, to shape sounds.[70][71] They typically include controls to set the point at which frequencies are attenuated, and to add resonance.[71] Common types include low-pass filters, which remove audio above a specified frequency, and high-pass filters, which do the opposite.[70] Filters may be controlled with envelopes or LFOs.[71]

Arpeggiators

[edit]
Trance Lead
sound sample of arpeggiator
A sample of Eurodance synthesizer riff with use of rapid 1/16 notes arpeggiator

Arpeggiators take input chords and convert them into arpeggios. They usually include controls for speed, range and mode (the movement of the arpeggio).[72]

Controllers

[edit]

Synthesizers are often controlled with electronic or digital keyboards or MIDI controller keyboards, which may be built into the synthesizer unit or attached via connections such as CV/gate, USB, or MIDI.[8] Keyboards may offer expression such as velocity sensitivity and aftertouch, allowing for more control over the sound.[8] Other controllers include ribbon controllers, which track the movement of the finger across a touch-sensitive surface; wind controllers, played similarly to woodwind instruments; motion-sensitive controllers similar to video game motion controllers; electronic drum pads, played similarly to the heads of a drum kit; touchplates, which send signals depending on finger position and force; controllers designed for microtonal tunings;[8] touchscreen devices such as tablets and smartphones;[8] and fingerpads.[8]

Clones

[edit]

Synthesizer clones are unlicensed recreations of previous synthesizers, often marketed as affordable versions of famous musical equipment. Clones are available as physical instruments and software. Companies that have sold software clones include Arturia and Native Instruments. Behringer manufactures equipment modelled on instruments including the Minimoog, Pro-One, and TB-303, and drum machines such as the TR-808. Other synthesizer clones include the MiniMOD (a series of Eurorack modules based on the Minimoog), the Intellijel Atlantis (based on the SH-101), and the x0x Heart (based on the TB-303).[73]

Creating clones of older hardware is legal where the patents have expired.[73] In 1997, Mackie lost their lawsuit against Behringer[74] as copyright law in the United States did not cover their circuit board designs.[73]

See also

[edit]
Lists
Various synthesizers
Related instruments & technologies
Components & technologies
Music genres
Notable works

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Synthesizer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A synthesizer is an that generates and modifies sounds electronically, typically by producing audio signals from basic waveforms that are then shaped and amplified to create a wide range of timbres and effects. Unlike traditional instruments that rely on mechanical or acoustic , synthesizers use circuits—either analog or digital—to synthesize sounds from scratch, enabling the imitation of natural instruments or the invention of entirely new sonic textures. The development of synthesizers traces back to the late 19th century with early electro-acoustic devices like Thaddeus Cahill's in 1897, but the modern form emerged in the mid-20th century through innovations such as the RCA Mark II Sound Synthesizer in 1957 and Robert Moog's voltage-controlled modular systems in the . These early analog synthesizers, often modular and keyboard-based, revolutionized music composition by allowing real-time manipulation, influencing experimental and popular genres from the onward. By the 1970s and 1980s, digital synthesizers like the introduced , making complex sounds more accessible and portable, which propelled the rise of , , and hip-hop production. At their core, synthesizers consist of key components including oscillators for generating fundamental waveforms (such as sine, square, or sawtooth), filters to shape frequency content (e.g., low-pass or high-pass), and envelope generators following the ADSR model—attack, decay, sustain, and —to control how sounds evolve over time. Additional elements like low-frequency oscillators (LFOs) for modulation and amplifiers for volume control allow for dynamic effects, from pulsating rhythms to sweeping . Synthesizers come in various forms, including modular systems for custom patching, polyphonic keyboards for multi-note performance, and software-based virtual instruments integrated into workstations. Synthesizers have profoundly impacted music across genres, enabling artists like , Kraftwerk, and to expand creative possibilities and define subgenres such as and new wave. Today, they remain essential in studios and live performances, with a resurgence in analog modular formats like alongside advanced digital emulations, blending historical techniques with contemporary computing power.

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

A is an that generates audio signals electronically to produce sounds, ranging from imitations of traditional acoustic instruments to entirely novel timbres created through synthesis processes. The term "synthesizer" derives from the English word "synthesize," ultimately tracing back to súnthesis, meaning "a putting together" or "composition," which aptly describes the instrument's method of combining basic elements like waveforms into complex sonic results. At its core, a synthesizer functions by generating raw audio signals—typically via oscillators—and manipulating them through adjustable parameters such as pitch (to control and thus note height), (to shape tonal quality), and volume (to adjust ). This allows musicians to craft dynamic, expressive performances in real time. In contrast to samplers, which reproduce and pitch-shift pre-recorded audio samples from existing sounds, synthesizers create audio from fundamental electronic building blocks without relying on stored recordings. The scope of synthesizers extends across diverse formats, including hardware instruments like keyboard synths and modular systems that use physical patches and controls, software variants such as (DAW) plugins and standalone applications for virtual , and hybrid models that integrate analog circuitry with digital processing for enhanced flexibility. Over time, synthesizers have evolved from bulky vacuum tube-based machines in the mid-20th century. Various sound synthesis techniques underpin these capabilities, enabling the creation of everything from realistic orchestral tones to abstract electronic textures.

Basic Principles of Operation

A synthesizer operates through a fundamental chain that transforms basic electrical signals into audible . At the core is the oscillator, which generates a periodic at a specific corresponding to the desired pitch. This raw serves as the starting point for creation, with common types including the , which contains a single without harmonics; the square wave, featuring odd harmonics that produce a hollow, buzzy ; the , rich in both odd and even harmonics for a bright, aggressive tone; and the , which includes odd harmonics but with decreasing , resulting in a softer, flute-like quality. The generated then passes through a filter, which shapes the by selectively attenuating or emphasizing certain frequency components, allowing for modifications in tonal color without altering the pitch. Following the filter, an (or voltage-controlled amplifier, VCA) modulates the signal's to control volume and dynamics over time. The processed signal is finally routed to an output stage, such as speakers, , or a mixing console, where it can be heard or further integrated into a larger audio system. This linear signal flow—oscillator to filter to to output—forms the backbone of most synthesizers, enabling the creation of diverse sounds from simple building blocks. In analog synthesizers, control is often achieved via voltage control, where low-voltage signals (control voltages, or CV) dictate parameters like pitch, and gate signals trigger note onsets and durations ( protocol). This allows precise, real-time manipulation of the sound generation process. Synthesizers can be monophonic, producing one note at a time, or polyphonic, capable of multiple simultaneous notes through additional or channels, expanding expressive possibilities for complex music. To evolve beyond static tones, synthesizers introduce modulation, which dynamically varies parameters like pitch, , or volume using sources such as low-frequency oscillators (LFOs) or envelopes, creating evolving, expressive sounds rather than unchanging pitches.

History

Precursors

The development of electronic sound generation in the late 19th and early 20th centuries laid essential groundwork for modern synthesizers through pioneering electromechanical devices that produced tones via electrical means rather than traditional acoustic methods. One of the earliest such inventions was the , patented in 1897 by American inventor Thaddeus Cahill. This massive instrument, often weighing over 200 tons and spanning multiple rooms, utilized an array of tonewheels driven by dynamos to generate signals corresponding to musical pitches, which were then amplified and transmitted over lines for performance. Designed as a "music plant" for broadcasting organ-like sounds, the represented the first attempt at electromechanical tone synthesis, though its impractical size and high power demands limited it to experimental demonstrations in New York between 1906 and 1914. In the , more compact electronic instruments emerged, building on principles of oscillation to create expressive, otherworldly timbres. The , invented in by French cellist and engineer Maurice Martenot, employed a heterodyning oscillator circuit controlled by a sliding ring on a wire for pitch variation, akin to a , and featured specialized speakers known as diffuseurs. One of these, the D1 diffuseur, incorporated to produce ethereal, bell-like tones with metallic overtones, enabling performers to evoke gliding glissandi and dynamic swells in orchestral settings. Similarly, the , developed in 1930 by German engineer Friedrich Trautwein and later refined by composer , used a ribbon controller for continuous pitch control and neon tube oscillators capable of generating subharmonic frequencies below the fundamental tone. This allowed for unusual timbres, including growling undertones and formant-like resonances, which Sala employed in film scores and experimental compositions throughout the mid-20th century. By the 1950s, advancements in electronics enabled more sophisticated studio-based synthesis systems, exemplified by the RCA Mark II Sound Synthesizer, installed in 1957 at the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center. Designed by RCA engineers Herbert Belar and Harry Olson, this room-sized apparatus featured 24 vacuum tube oscillators, white noise generators, and a binary sequencer controlled via punched paper tape programs, allowing composers like Vladimir Ussachevsky to create complex electronic compositions by sequencing waveforms, envelopes, and filters. Despite its innovations in programmable sound design, the RCA Mark II shared the era's key limitations: its enormous footprint (occupying a 10-by-20-foot wall), reliance on punched tape for control rather than real-time performance, and confinement to institutional studios due to high costs and power requirements, rendering it non-portable and inaccessible for live use. These precursors, while electromechanical and experimental, influenced subsequent voltage-controlled analog synthesizers by demonstrating the potential of modular signal generation and manipulation for musical composition.

1960s: Early Analog Developments

The 1960s marked the emergence of commercial analog synthesizers, building on earlier experimental precursors like the by introducing voltage-controlled modules that enabled real-time sound manipulation. These instruments shifted electronic music from tape-based composition to interactive performance tools, primarily through modular designs that allowed users to patch components for custom sound generation. Pioneered by , the Moog Modular Synthesizer debuted in 1964 as the first voltage-controlled featuring a keyboard interface. It employed subtractive synthesis, where oscillators generated rich waveforms that were shaped by filters and amplifiers to produce diverse tones. This system gained widespread recognition through Wendy Carlos's 1968 album , which demonstrated its potential for classical reinterpretations and sold over a million copies, popularizing synthesizers beyond circles. In parallel, developed the Buchla 100 Series in 1966, a tailored for without a traditional keyboard. Instead, it emphasized alternative controllers like touch-sensitive plates and joysticks to encourage intuitive, non-linear sound exploration in live settings. Commissioned for the Tape Music Center, the Buchla 100 prioritized complex over melodic playback, influencing composers seeking abstract timbres. Alan Robert Pearlman introduced the in 1969, a modular system distinguished by its pin-matrix patching for reliable connections and integrated sequencing capabilities via modules like the sequencer. This design facilitated rhythmic patterns and early experiments in operation, allowing limited simultaneous note playback. The ARP 2500's robust oscillators and filters made it a studio staple for precise . These instruments debuted culturally through performances by composers like , who used the Buchla 100 in live electronic works such as Silver Apples of the Moon (1967), bridging studio experimentation with onstage improvisation. This era transitioned synthesizers from bespoke laboratory devices to accessible tools for musicians, laying the groundwork for broader adoption in popular genres.

1970s: Portability and Polyphony

The 1970s marked a pivotal shift in synthesizer design toward greater portability and accessibility, building briefly on the bulky modular systems of the previous decade. The , released by in 1970, exemplified this trend as the first portable synthesizer, featuring a built-in keyboard and monophonic operation that allowed performers to play it live without extensive patching. Priced at around $1,495, it became iconic in , notably used by of for its expressive leads and by of Yes for layered textures in performances. Similarly, the , introduced in 1972 by , offered a compact, portable design capable of playing two notes simultaneously, making it a versatile tool for touring musicians at a more affordable price point of about $800. Advancements in represented another major breakthrough, enabling synthesizers to handle multiple independent voices for chordal playing. The Oberheim Four-Voice, launched in 1974, achieved this by combining four Synthesizer Expander Modules (SEMs), each with dedicated oscillators, filters, and envelopes, to create the first commercially successful polyphonic analog synthesizer. This modular approach allowed for rich, multi-timbral sounds and was widely adopted in studios for its four-voice capability. Building on such innovations, the from Sequential Circuits, released in 1978, introduced the first fully polyphonic synthesizer with programmable patch memory, using integrated circuits to manage five voices efficiently and store up to 40 presets digitally. Its microprocessor-controlled design streamlined sound design, reducing setup time from manual tweaking to instant recall. These developments fueled rapid market growth, as falling costs from integrated circuits made synthesizers viable beyond experimental studios. By the mid-1970s, instruments like the and were staples in bands such as Yes and Genesis, while disco producers like employed them for pulsating basslines and rhythms in hits by . The integration of affordable ICs, such as those in the , lowered manufacturing expenses and prices, broadening adoption from elite session players to mainstream pop and electronic acts, with global synthesizer sales surging into the millions by decade's end.

1980s: Digital Innovations

The 1980s marked a pivotal transition in synthesizer technology from analog to digital paradigms, building briefly on the polyphonic advancements of the previous decade to enable more complex, stable, and affordable sound generation. Digital innovations allowed for greater precision in control and without the tuning instabilities of analog circuits, fostering widespread adoption in both professional and consumer markets. This era's developments emphasized computational algorithms for synthesis and standardized communication protocols, shifting the instrument from hardware toward integrated systems. A landmark achievement was frequency modulation (FM) synthesis, pioneered by John Chowning at , who developed the core algorithms in 1967 and secured a (US4018121A) in 1975 for generating complex timbres through modulating a carrier wave's frequency with a modulator. Yamaha licensed this technology in 1973 and commercialized it in the DX7 synthesizer, released in 1983 as the first mass-market digital instrument. The DX7 featured 16-voice , a preset-based architecture with 128 factory sounds, and six sine-wave operators per voice configurable via 32 algorithms, producing bright, metallic tones that contrasted with analog warmth but offered superior consistency and editing depth. Its affordability at around $2,000 democratized advanced synthesis, outselling predecessors and defining the era's sound palette. Complementing FM's rise was the introduction of the Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI) protocol in 1983, developed collaboratively by manufacturers including , Yamaha, and Sequential Circuits to standardize data transmission between synthesizers, controllers, and computers. enabled serial communication of note data, velocity, and control parameters at 31.25 kbps, revolutionizing sequencing by allowing multi-device without proprietary cables, thus streamlining studio workflows and live performances. This spurred a proliferation of compatible hardware, from keyboards to drum machines, embedding synthesizers into broader digital ecosystems. Other notable digital keyboards bridged analog traditions with emerging technologies, such as the (1981), a hybrid polyphonic synthesizer with analog oscillators augmented by digital preset memory for 128 patches, delivering eight voices of lush, versatile tones. Similarly, the , launched in 1979 and refined through the 1980s, combined digital sampling with in a format, offering 8-voice , editing via a lightpen interface, and integration of recorded sounds into synthetic timbres for film scores and . These instruments exemplified the decade's hybrid approaches, blending computational power with expressive control. The commercial boom of digital synthesizers permeated pop music, exemplified by their prominent role in Michael Jackson's Thriller (1982), where the Jupiter-8 provided iconic string and brass layers on tracks like the title song, amplifying the album's global impact with over 70 million copies sold. This accessibility contributed to the decline of costly modular analog systems, which often exceeded $10,000 and required extensive cabling, as digital alternatives like the DX7 offered comparable or superior and reliability at a fraction of the price, redirecting market focus toward compact, programmable units.

1990s–2010s: Software Emergence

The marked a pivotal shift in synthesizer technology toward software-based solutions, driven by advancing computational power and the of workstations (DAWs). This era saw the rise of virtual analog synthesis, where algorithms emulated the warm, organic tones of analog hardware through digital modeling. Building on MIDI protocols established in the for device interconnectivity, software synthesizers enabled seamless integration within computer environments, reducing reliance on expensive physical gear. A cornerstone of this transition was Steinberg's introduction of the (VST) standard in 1996, which allowed third-party audio plugins to operate within host applications like Cubase. This open architecture democratized plugin development, fostering an ecosystem where synthesizers could be loaded as software instruments directly into DAWs, streamlining production workflows for composers and producers. By the late , VST-compatible tools proliferated, enabling real-time sound manipulation without dedicated hardware. Pioneering software platforms exemplified modular and rack-based design philosophies. ' Reaktor, originally released in 1996 as the Generator , introduced a flexible modular environment where users could build custom instruments from oscillators, filters, and effects blocks, revolutionizing through user-programmable patches. Similarly, Propellerhead's Reason, launched in 2000, offered a virtual rackmount studio simulating hardware synths, samplers, and mixers in a cohesive interface, appealing to electronic musicians seeking an all-in-one production suite. These tools empowered experimentation, with Reaktor's ensemble system influencing subsequent modular software. Software emulations of classic hardware further bridged analog nostalgia with digital convenience during the 2000s. Arturia's Analog Experience series, emerging in the early 2000s, provided meticulously modeled recreations of vintage synthesizers like the and as VST plugins, capturing subtle imperfections such as oscillator drift through advanced modeling techniques. This approach allowed producers to access historically significant timbres affordably, integrating them into modern DAWs and expanding creative possibilities beyond original hardware limitations. Hardware-software hybrids blurred boundaries, combining physical interfaces with digital processing. Roland's JP-8080, released in 1998, employed virtual analog modeling to replicate the JP-8000's supersaw waveforms and analog-style filters in a rackmount format, supporting control for integration with computers. Likewise, Korg's Triton workstation, introduced in 1999, fused sample playback with synthesis engines, offering expansive multisampling libraries alongside editable synthesis parameters, which became staples in studio and live settings. These instruments facilitated a hybrid , where hardware triggered software expansions. The period's emphasis on accessibility transformed music production, particularly through free and low-cost tools that fueled bedroom studios. Instruments like the open-source VST, developed in the early , provided basic subtractive synthesis capabilities without cost barriers, enabling hobbyists to experiment on consumer PCs. This , coupled with portable laptops, shifted live performance paradigms; artists increasingly used software rigs for onstage , unencumbered by bulky analog setups, and contributed to the explosion of independent electronic music genres. By the , such ecosystems had made professional-grade synthesis ubiquitous, profoundly impacting global music creation. The have seen a continued revival of analog synthesizers, building on earlier hardware interests with affordable clones and boutique innovations. has expanded its line of homage synthesizers, releasing models like the Pro-1 in late 2019 that carried into widespread adoption through the decade, and announcing further clones such as the Elka Synthex in 2025, which replicate classic designs at accessible price points. Boutique manufacturers like Make Noise have driven modular advancements, introducing modules such as the MultiMod in 2025, which generates eight complex modulation signals from a single input, and the Resynthesizer system combining Spectraphon and Morphagene for resynthesis-based . This hardware resurgence has fueled market expansion, with the global music synthesizers market projected to grow by USD 336.3 million from to 2029 at a (CAGR) of 8.5%, largely driven by affordable analog and hybrid options appealing to both professionals and hobbyists. The modular segment, particularly , has experienced notable growth at a CAGR of 7.2% through the decade, supported by increasing demand for customizable systems amid rising interest in experimental sound creation. Hybrid trends have integrated hardware with software, exemplified by apps like Animoog Z (released in 2021), which emulates multidimensional Moog synthesis and connects via to physical controllers for seamless mobile production. Global adoption has accelerated in non-Western markets, with emerging as the fastest-growing region at a projected CAGR of 10.5%, bolstered by expanding music scenes, rising disposable incomes, and production hubs in countries like and that facilitate cost-effective manufacturing. However, concerns have gained prominence in synthesizer production, prompting companies such as Moog and to adopt greener practices, including reduced material waste and energy-efficient processes, amid broader pressures for eco-friendly supply chains in .

Sound Synthesis Techniques

Subtractive Synthesis

Subtractive synthesis is a foundational technique in electronic music production, characterized by starting with a harmonically rich —typically a sawtooth or square wave produced by oscillators—and then selectively removing components to shape the sound's . A is commonly employed to attenuate higher frequencies, allowing lower ones to pass through while progressively rolling off the upper harmonics, which results in a smoother, more mellow tone. The process is completed by applying an envelope generator to modulate the over time via a voltage-controlled , providing dynamic control over attack, decay, sustain, and release to evolve the sound temporally. This method gained historical primacy in the development of analog synthesizers during the late 1960s and 1970s, serving as the core architecture for instruments from pioneers like and . Moog's designs, including the modular systems and the iconic released in 1970, relied on subtractive principles with voltage-controlled components for real-time manipulation. A key innovation was the Moog ladder filter, a 24 dB/octave low-pass design patented in 1969, which used a transistor ladder network to achieve smooth frequency attenuation and became a benchmark for analog warmth. Similarly, ARP synthesizers like the 2600, introduced in 1971, embodied subtractive synthesis through semi-modular patching that emphasized filter-based sound sculpting. At its core, the timbre in subtractive synthesis is defined by the filter's fcf_c, which determines the boundary between passed and attenuated frequencies, directly influencing the brightness or dullness of the output. enhances this by boosting energy at and near fcf_c, controlled by the —a measure of the filter's selectivity calculated as Q=fcΔfQ = \frac{f_c}{\Delta f}, where Δf\Delta f is the bandwidth—allowing for pronounced peaks that add character, such as the whistling tones in classic leads. Higher Q values narrow the bandwidth, intensifying the but risking instability like in analog implementations. The advantages of subtractive synthesis include its intuitive workflow, which mirrors natural sound perception by emphasizing removal over addition, and its ability to produce versatile, warm analog-like tones using minimal components, making it computationally efficient even in modern digital emulations. This simplicity facilitated early synthesizer portability and accessibility, contributing to its dominance in genres from rock to electronic music. However, a primary disadvantage is its inherent limitation to harmonic alteration within the source waveform's spectrum, restricting the creation of inharmonic or metallic timbres without additional techniques.

Additive and Wavetable Synthesis

Additive synthesis constructs complex timbres by summing multiple sine waves, each representing a harmonic partial of the fundamental frequency. The output signal is mathematically expressed as y(t)=∑n=1NAnsin⁡(2πfnt+ϕn),y(t) = \sum_{n=1}^{N} A_n \sin(2\pi f_n t + \phi_n), where fn=nf0f_n = n f_0 is the frequency of the nn-th harmonic (with f0f_0 as the fundamental), AnA_n is the amplitude of that partial, ϕn\phi_n is its phase offset, and NN is the number of partials used. This approach, rooted in Joseph Fourier's 1822 theorem on periodic waveforms, enables precise control over each partial's amplitude and envelope, allowing synthesis of any periodic sound from basic components. Early implementations appeared in the , patented by Thaddeus Cahill in 1897, which used tonewheels to generate and add sine waves for organ-like tones transmitted over telephone lines. The , introduced in 1935, refined this analog additive method with drawbars to mix harmonics, producing rich, pipe-organ emulations that became staples in and . In digital form, gained prominence in the 1980s with instruments like the and , which handled dozens of partials per voice for realistic instrument modeling. Applications often focus on harmonic-rich sounds, such as bell-like or string timbres, where individual envelopes shape each partial's attack and decay for natural evolution. Real-time additive synthesis demands significant computation due to the need for numerous oscillators and mixers—typically 32 to 256 per voice—making it impractical in analog hardware but ideal for digital processors. Modern software, like those in the Kawai K5000 series, optimize this via fast Fourier transforms to reduce processing load while maintaining spectral fidelity. Wavetable synthesis, a digital technique, generates sounds by scanning through a table of pre-stored single-cycle waveforms, allowing timbral evolution via position modulation. Developed conceptually by Max Mathews in 1958 for computer music software, it was commercialized by Wolfgang Palm in the PPG Wave 2.2 synthesizer of 1982, which featured 2,000 editable wavetables for metallic and glassy tones. The process involves interpolating between waveforms in the table, controlled by parameters like LFOs or envelopes, to create morphing effects that blend harmonics smoothly without artifacts when band-limited. This method excels in producing dynamic, evolving pads and textures, as seen in the PPG's influence on synth-pop, where wavetable scanning added movement to sustained sounds. Contemporary examples include Xfer Records' Serum, released in 2014, which allows users to import, draw, and warp custom wavetables for intricate, genre-spanning designs in electronic music production. Unlike static oscillators, wavetable's computational efficiency stems from memory lookups rather than real-time sine summation, though it requires filters for clean high-frequency output.

Frequency Modulation and Phase Distortion

(FM) synthesis involves modulating the of a carrier with the instantaneous of a modulator , producing a rich spectrum of sidebands around the carrier . In this technique, the carrier fcf_c is modulated by the modulator fmf_m, resulting in sidebands at frequencies fc±kfmf_c \pm k f_m for integer values k=1,2,…k = 1, 2, \dots. The amplitudes of these sidebands are determined by the modulation index β\beta, governed by Bessel functions of the first kind, Jk(β)J_k(\beta), which allow precise control over the harmonic and inharmonic content of the resulting timbre. A landmark implementation of FM synthesis appeared in the synthesizer, released in 1983, which employed six operators configurable in various algorithms as stacked modulators and carriers to generate complex timbres. These operator stacks enabled the creation of bright, metallic sounds, such as electric pianos and bells, by routing modulation signals through hierarchical structures that produced evolving spectra. Phase distortion synthesis, introduced by Casio in their CZ series synthesizers in 1984, achieves similar timbral effects to FM but through a different mechanism: warping the phase accumulator of a digital oscillator rather than directly modulating frequency. This method distorts the phase-to-amplitude mapping of simple waveforms like sine or cosine, yielding bell-like and percussive tones without employing true frequency modulation, making it computationally simpler for hardware realization. The intricate nature of FM and , stemming from their ability to generate inharmonic spectra, often results in instruments that are preset-heavy, as real-time programming requires deep understanding of modulation ratios and indices to avoid dissonant or unstable sounds. Modern software emulations, such as ' FM8, have revived these techniques by providing intuitive interfaces for algorithm editing and preset morphing, facilitating broader accessibility in contemporary music production.

Granular and Other Methods

Granular synthesis is a sound synthesis technique that breaks down audio signals into short segments known as grains, typically lasting 1 to 100 milliseconds, which are then independently manipulated to generate complex sonic textures. This method draws from the foundational theory proposed by physicist in 1947, who conceptualized sound as composed of discrete "acoustical quanta" or grains as the basic units for auditory perception and representation. Early musical applications emerged in the through composer , who employed granular principles in tape-based works like Analogique B (1959), splicing into thousands of tiny fragments to create sound masses. By the late and , computer implementations became feasible, with Curtis Roads pioneering automated granular synthesis algorithms that enabled real-time generation of evolving sound clouds through deferred-time processing. In granular synthesis, parameters such as grain density (the rate at which grains are triggered), pitch (via resampling or time-scaling individual grains), overlap (the degree to which consecutive grains intersect), and spatial positioning are adjusted to produce dense, shimmering textures often described as "clouds" of sound. For instance, high-density grain clouds with randomized pitch variations can evoke ethereal, ambient washes, while sparse overlaps yield stuttering or fragmented effects. A key manipulation involves grain transposition through time-stretching techniques rooted in principles, where the audio is via (STFT) frames, and the synthesis hop size is altered relative to the analysis hop size to expand or compress duration without affecting pitch. The time-scale modification factor α\alpha is defined as α=RsRa,\alpha = \frac{R_s}{R_a}, where RaR_a is the analysis hop size and RsR_s is the synthesis hop size; for α>1\alpha > 1 (time expansion), Rs>RaR_s > R_a increases overlap between grains, preserving the original spectral content. Beyond granular methods, physical modeling synthesis simulates the acoustic behavior of instruments by solving mathematical models of their physical properties, such as wave propagation in strings or air columns, to generate realistic timbres with natural expressivity. A seminal example is the Karplus-Strong algorithm, introduced in 1983, which models plucked string sounds by circulating a noise burst through a looped delay line filtered by a low-pass filter to mimic damping and decay. This approach allows for dynamic control over parameters like tension and material properties, producing plucking, bowing, or striking articulations without relying on stored samples. Another hybrid technique from the 1980s is linear arithmetic (LA) synthesis, developed by for their D-50 synthesizer in 1987, which blends short (PCM) samples for percussive attacks with linearly summed synthesized waveforms for sustained tones, enabling efficient emulation of acoustic instruments like pianos through subtractive processing. In modern contexts, granular and related methods thrive in ambient and genres, where they craft immersive soundscapes; for example, Ableton's Granulator device processes samples into looping grain streams for real-time texture generation in live performances and studio productions.

Components

Oscillators

Oscillators serve as the primary sound-generating components in synthesizers, producing periodic waveforms that form the foundation of synthesized tones. These devices convert control signals, typically voltage in analog systems, into audible frequencies, enabling musicians to create pitches ranging from subsonic to ultrasonic. In analog synthesizers, voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs) dominate, where the output frequency responds exponentially to input voltage for musical intonation, following the 1V/ standard: each 1-volt increase doubles the frequency, corresponding to an rise. This exponential conversion is achieved through circuits like transistor-based current sources or ladders, ensuring precise tracking across multiple . The mathematical relationship in a 1V/octave VCO can be expressed as: f=f0×2V/1f = f_0 \times 2^{V / 1} where ff is the output , f0f_0 is the base , and VV is the control voltage in volts. Common waveforms generated by VCOs include sine (), sawtooth (rich harmonics), square (hollow ), and (softer harmonics), each offering distinct timbral qualities suitable for subtractive synthesis where rich waveforms are sculpted by subsequent filters. Synchronization techniques enhance timbral variation by coupling multiple oscillators. Hard sync abruptly resets the slave oscillator's phase to the master's rising edge, introducing higher harmonics and a metallic edge, while soft sync allows partial phase influence, yielding smoother, evolving textures without full reset. These methods, often voltage-controllable, enable dynamic sound design, such as aggressive leads or complex pads. In polyphonic synthesizers, each voice typically features one or more dedicated oscillators to maintain independent pitches, with multiple units per voice allowing layering for fuller tones. Slight detuning between these oscillators—often by a few cents—creates beating patterns that simulate chorusing, adding width and movement without additional effects processing. Digital oscillators, particularly those using direct digital synthesis (DDS), generate waveforms via numerical computation from a fixed clock, offering superior precision and stability compared to analog drift. DDS employs a phase accumulator and to produce arbitrary waveforms, enabling fine resolution and rapid tuning without analog components. The evolution of synthesizer oscillators traces from vacuum tube-based designs in early electronic instruments, which provided warm but unstable tones, to transistorized VCOs in the and for greater reliability, and finally to integrated silicon chips in modern hybrids, miniaturizing complex functions like exponential converters onto single dies.

Filters

In synthesizers, filters are essential components for shaping by selectively attenuating or emphasizing specific frequency ranges in the , typically following the output of oscillators. This frequency-domain processing allows for the creation of diverse sonic textures, from mellow warmth to sharp aggression, by altering the content without changing the fundamental pitch. The primary types of filters used in synthesizers are , , and . A attenuates frequencies above a specified point, allowing lower frequencies to pass through and resulting in a smoother, less bright . In contrast, a removes frequencies below the , emphasizing higher harmonics to produce thinner or more percussive tones. A permits a narrow range of frequencies around the to pass while attenuating both lower and higher frequencies, isolating midrange elements for focused, vocal-like effects. These filters are fundamental to subtractive synthesis, where rich oscillator waveforms are sculpted by removing unwanted harmonics. Resonance, often denoted by the Q factor, enhances the filter's effect by boosting frequencies near the point, creating a peak that adds character and emphasis to the sound. A higher Q value results in a narrower, more pronounced peak, which can introduce tonal coloration or even whistling effects, while lower values yield a gentler . The slope of the filter's , measured in decibels per (dB/), determines how steeply frequencies are attenuated beyond the ; common slopes include 12 dB/ for a two-pole and 24 dB/ for a four-pole configuration. Classic analog filters, such as the Moog ladder filter introduced in the 1960s, exemplify early voltage-controlled designs that became staples in modular and polyphonic synthesizers. This transistor-based features a 24 dB/ roll-off and is renowned for its warm, overdriven tone when driven hard. Its behavior can be modeled using the second-order low-pass for and : H(s)=1s2+sQ+1H(s) = \frac{1}{s^2 + \frac{s}{Q} + 1} where ss is the complex frequency variable, and QQ is the resonance factor; higher-order implementations like the Moog cascade multiple stages for steeper attenuation. In digital synthesizers, filters approximate these analog characteristics using (IIR) or (FIR) structures. IIR filters, which incorporate feedback for efficiency, closely mimic the recursive nature of analog circuits and are preferred for real-time processing due to lower computational demands. filters, relying on convolution, provide response and stability but require more resources for sharp approximations. Modern digital synths often employ multimode filters that seamlessly switch between low-pass, high-pass, band-pass, and other configurations, enabling versatile manipulation within software or hybrid instruments. A notable feature of many resonant filters, particularly in analog designs, is , where high levels cause the filter to generate its own signal—a pure at the —even without input. This occurs due to feedback amplification within the filter circuit, effectively turning it into a for precise tonal generation.

Envelopes and Voltage-Controlled Amplifiers

Envelopes in synthesizers provide time-based control over parameters such as and , typically generated by an envelope generator (EG) that outputs a unipolar voltage contour triggered by a signal from a keyboard or controller. The most common form is the ADSR envelope, consisting of four stages: Attack, which defines the time for the voltage to rise from zero to its peak level; Decay, the subsequent drop to the sustain level; Sustain, a steady voltage held while the remains active; and , the fall to zero after the ends. These stages allow precise shaping of sound dynamics, with attack and decay times measured in milliseconds or seconds, sustain as a proportional level (e.g., 0 to 1), and similarly timed. The ADSR is commonly applied to a voltage-controlled (VCA) to modulate , creating the perceived contour of a note, and to a voltage-controlled filter (VCF) to alter over time, such as opening a filter during attack for brightness. A VCA functions by multiplying the incoming with a control voltage from the envelope, where the output is proportional to the product of the signal and the normalized control voltage (typically 0 to 1 or 0 to 5V). For perceptual accuracy, VCAs often employ a logarithmic response curve, as human hearing perceives loudness logarithmically, ensuring even control over levels rather than linear scaling. Variations on the basic ADSR include multi-stage envelopes, which extend beyond four phases for more complex contours, such as adding a hold stage after attack (AHDSR) to maintain peak level briefly or a delay before attack (DADSR) for postponed onset. Examples include the five-stage ADBSSR in the Korg Poly-800, incorporating a break point between decay and sustain for stepped shaping. Velocity sensitivity integrates keyboard strike force (e.g., via MIDI values 0-127) to modulate envelope parameters, such as scaling sustain level or shortening attack time for harder hits, enhancing expressive dynamics. In analog synthesizers, envelopes rely on discrete components like transistors, capacitors, and timers (e.g., ICs) to generate smooth voltage curves through charging and discharging circuits, as seen in implementations where attack uses RC integration for linear ramps. Digital envelopes, conversely, use software algorithms to define precise curves via microprocessors or processors, offering greater flexibility in stage count and resolution (e.g., 5-bit quantization in early digital EGs) without physical component limitations. This shift enables arbitrary multi-stage designs in software synthesizers while analog versions provide inherent "organic" imperfections from component tolerances.

Low-Frequency Oscillators

Low-frequency oscillators (LFOs) are specialized oscillators in synthesizers that operate at sub-audible frequencies, typically ranging from 0.1 Hz to 20 Hz, to generate periodic control signals for modulating other sound parameters without producing audible tones themselves. These modulations add expressivity and movement to synthesized sounds, such as varying pitch for vibrato, filter cutoff for wah-wah effects, or amplitude for tremolo, enabling dynamic, evolving timbres that mimic natural acoustic variations. Unlike one-shot envelopes that trigger briefly per note, LFOs deliver continuous, cyclic modulation for ongoing variation. LFOs employ waveforms similar to those of audio-rate oscillators, including sine, , square, and sometimes sawtooth or random (sample-and-hold) shapes, but at low rates to create smooth or stepped modulations. The choice of waveform influences the modulation character: a produces gentle, sinusoidal sweeps ideal for subtle , while a square wave yields abrupt, on-off changes for pronounced rhythmic effects like . LFOs can operate in free-run mode, independent of the synthesizer's , or sync to an internal clock or external MIDI clock for rhythmic alignment, enhancing their utility in musical contexts. Key controls for LFOs include rate, which adjusts the speed within the low-frequency range, and depth (or amount), which scales the modulation intensity to avoid overpowering the core sound. Routing flexibility allows assignment to multiple destinations per voice, often via patch bays in modular systems or matrix menus in digital synths; many designs support multiple LFOs simultaneously for layered modulations, such as one for pitch and another for filter panning. In the Model D, for instance, the dedicated LFO (with and square waveforms) modulates oscillator pitch for or filter for wah effects, using rate and mix controls to blend with other sources like the modulation wheel. Modern implementations extend LFO capabilities, such as in digital synthesizers where they can modulate delay line parameters for complex, evolving textures like or chorusing derived from time-based variations. This routing versatility, pioneered in analog designs like the , remains foundational for creating subtle movement in leads or pads, as seen in its application for atmospheric swells in electronic music production.

Controllers and Sequencers

Controllers in synthesizers serve as the primary interface for performers to input musical data, translating physical actions into electrical signals that trigger and modulate sound generation. Traditional keyboards, often velocity-sensitive, measure the force applied when a key is struck to vary parameters like volume or , with early implementations appearing in instruments such as the released in 1976. Aftertouch, which responds to continued pressure after a key is depressed, further enhances expressivity by allowing real-time modulation, also pioneered in the for per-note control. Pad controllers, typically velocity- and pressure-sensitive surfaces, enable percussive or rhythmic input, commonly integrated into modern setups for triggering samples or notes in synthesizer performances. controllers, narrow touch-sensitive strips, provide continuous control over pitch or other parameters by sliding a finger along their length, as seen in classic designs like the CS-80's ribbon for gliding between notes. The standard, introduced in , revolutionized connectivity by allowing external controllers—such as keyboards or pads—to interface with synthesizers from different manufacturers, enabling unified control across devices. Sequencers automate note playback and patterning, essential for performance and composition in synthesizers. Step-time sequencers involve programming individual notes or events at discrete intervals, exemplified by the TB-303's 16-step sequencer released in 1981, which allowed users to input bass lines step by step for repetitive patterns. In contrast, real-time sequencers capture performances as they occur, recording timing and velocity directly from a controller for more fluid, improvisational results. Arpeggiators, a specialized form of sequencer, automatically generate broken-chord patterns from held notes, with common modes including up (ascending order), down (descending), up/down (alternating), and random (non-sequential). Their rate can synchronize to an internal or external clock for precise rhythmic alignment with other elements in a synthesizer setup. In modern synthesizers, particularly software-based ones, controllers have evolved to include touchscreens for intuitive parameter adjustment and gesture-based interfaces that interpret hand movements for expressive modulation, as in the Expressive E Touché controller which maps gestures to or plugin parameters. These advancements expand beyond traditional hardware, integrating with digital environments for enhanced performance flexibility.

Cultural and Economic Impact

Influence on Music Genres

Synthesizers profoundly shaped progressive rock in the 1970s by enabling complex, orchestral soundscapes that expanded beyond traditional instrumentation. Bands like Yes incorporated the Moog synthesizer extensively, with keyboardist Rick Wakeman using it to create symphonic layers on albums such as Fragile (1971), where its rich, modular tones added depth to epic tracks like "Heart of the Sunrise." Similarly, Genesis employed Moog modules alongside other keyboards, as heard in the intricate solos of The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway (1974), contributing to the genre's hallmark of virtuosic, experimental compositions. These innovations elevated keyboards from supportive roles to lead elements, influencing the genre's fusion of classical, jazz, and rock elements. In new wave and synth-pop, synthesizers defined the cold, futuristic aesthetic of the late 1970s and 1980s. Gary Numan's 1979 hit "Cars" from The Pleasure Principle showcased the Polymoog synthesizer's distinctive Vox Humana preset, producing the track's iconic, wavering lead lines that epitomized the genre's mechanical detachment and propelled it to global success. Depeche Mode further popularized digital synthesis in synth-pop through the Yamaha DX7's crystalline bell tones, notably the "Tub Bells" preset on Some Great Reward (1984), which added shimmering textures to songs like "People Are People," helping define the era's polished, electronic sound. This shift toward affordable digital synths democratized production, blending pop accessibility with electronic innovation. In modern electronic dance music (EDM), Daft Punk revived hardware synthesizers on Random Access Memories (2013), using analog modules for warm, organic bass and leads in tracks like "Get Lucky," bridging retro funk with contemporary beats. Electronic genres owe much of their foundational sound to early synthesizer experimentation. Kraftwerk's (1974) utilized custom modular synthesizers to craft minimalist, rhythms and ambient textures, simulating vehicular sounds in the title track and establishing electronic music's repetitive, hypnotic structures. The bass synthesizer later revolutionized and in the late , with its squelching, resonant "acid" basslines—famously on Phuture's "" (1987)—driving movement and influencing underground club scenes worldwide. Synthesizers also permeated genres, infusing and hip-hop with electronic grooves. pioneered synthesizer use in 1970s funk-jazz fusion, employing the and on albums like Head Hunters (1973) for pulsating basslines in "Chameleon," merging acoustic jazz improvisation with electric timbres. In hip-hop, the became integral to sampling and synth hybrids from the early , providing booming kicks and snares on tracks like Afrika Bambaataa's "Planet Rock" (1982), which layered 808 rhythms with synth melodies to birth electro-hip-hop. The 2020s synthwave revival draws heavily on analog synthesizers to evoke nostalgia, with artists like employing hardware like the and for retro-futuristic leads, as in their atmospheric tracks that extend the genre's cinematic vibe into contemporary productions. This resurgence highlights synthesizers' enduring role in genre evolution, blending vintage warmth with modern digital tools.

Role in Film, Television, and Media

Synthesizers have played a pivotal role in film scoring since the early 1970s, providing innovative electronic textures that enhance narrative tension and atmospheric depth. Wendy Carlos's groundbreaking use of the in Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange (1971) marked a landmark integration, where she adapted classical pieces like Beethoven's Ninth Symphony into eerie, synthesized versions that underscored the film's dystopian themes. This approach not only popularized the Moog but also demonstrated synthesizers' ability to blend orchestral elements with futuristic timbres, influencing subsequent cinematic soundtracks. Similarly, Vangelis employed the for soaring solos and ambient pads in Ridley Scott's (1982), creating the film's iconic soundscape that evoked isolation and neon-lit melancholy. In television, synthesizers contributed to memorable themes and incidental music, often defining genre aesthetics. The original Doctor Who theme, composed by Ron Grainer and realized by Delia Derbyshire in 1963, used tape manipulation and white noise generators to produce its haunting, otherworldly drones and pulses, serving as an early precursor to synthesizer-based sci-fi sound design. During the 1980s, Jan Hammer's scores for Miami Vice leveraged FM synthesis from instruments like the Yamaha DX7 to craft a glossy, neon-infused electronic palette that mirrored the show's vibrant, high-stakes visual style. Beyond scoring, synthesizers have been instrumental in sound design for broader media, including advertisements, video games, and immersive effects. Early video games like those on the employed the TIA sound chip—a basic programmable synthesizer—to generate effects, such as the rhythmic beeps and sweeps in titles like Pitfall! (1982), which added urgency and playfulness to interactive experiences. Modular synthesizers, with their flexible patching capabilities, have long been favored for crafting sci-fi atmospheres in films; for instance, Eduard Artemyev used the modular system to create ethereal, evolving textures for Andrei Tarkovsky's (1979), evoking the Zone's mysterious, alien environments. The evolution of synthesizer use in media has shifted toward software integration in the post-2000s era, enabling composers to layer complex, hybrid sounds efficiently. Tools like Spectrasonics Omnisphere have become staples in film and game scoring, as seen in its application for granular pads and evolving drones in (2017), where it transformed field recordings into post-apocalyptic ambiences. In the 2020s, AI-assisted Foley has emerged as a complementary , where algorithms generate synchronized sound effects from video analysis, augmenting traditional synthesizer workflows to produce realistic yet synthetic impacts for films like those in contemporary sci-fi productions.

Industry and Employment Effects

The synthesizer industry originated with boutique operations like , which handcrafted modular synthesizers in small quantities starting in the , establishing a for experimental electronic instruments. This artisanal approach transitioned to mass production in the 1970s and 1980s, as companies such as Yamaha and scaled manufacturing to produce affordable, widely accessible models like the and Roland Juno series, democratizing synthesizer technology for musicians and studios worldwide. By 2024, the global music synthesizers market was valued at a scale supporting continued expansion, projected to grow by USD 336.3 million from 2024 to 2029 at a (CAGR) of 8.5%, driven by demand for both hardware and software integrations. Employment in the sector encompasses specialized roles that blend , , and craftsmanship. Synthesizer designers, including (DSP) engineers focused on methods like (FM) synthesis, develop innovative sound generation architectures for major firms. Repair technicians maintain analog units, a growing niche amid collector demand, with dedicated services training part-time experts to handle modular and semi-modular repairs. Software developers contribute by creating plugin emulations of classic synthesizers, supporting the shift toward virtual instruments in workstations. Economic shifts have been influenced by the analog revival since the , fostering niche employment among module makers and small-scale producers who craft customizable components for modular systems. , particularly through Chinese manufacturing, has enabled affordable clones—such as 's recreations of Moog designs—expanding market access but introducing challenges like disputes, exemplified by past legal tensions between Moog and over design similarities. Additionally, the industry faces sustainability issues from , as obsolete hardware contributes to environmental pollution; efforts toward recyclable materials and repair-focused practices are emerging to mitigate e-waste accumulation.

Modern Developments

Software Synthesizers

Software synthesizers represent digital emulations of analog hardware and original algorithmic designs, running as plugins within digital audio workstations (DAWs) or standalone applications. Their evolution began in the 1980s with foundational tools like Csound, a unit generator-based system developed by Barry Vercoe and first released in 1986 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Csound enabled programmable sound synthesis through text-based scores and orchestras, influencing subsequent systems. By the and 2000s, software synths proliferated as VST/AU plugins, transitioning from academic tools to commercial products integrated into professional production workflows. Modern software synthesizers emphasize advanced synthesis techniques and user-friendly interfaces. Notable examples include Serum, a wavetable synthesizer released by Xfer Records in 2014, which offers visual editing and high-fidelity capabilities. Similarly, Vital, a free spectral warping wavetable synth developed by Matt Tytel, launched on November 24, 2020, providing accessible advanced features like animated controls and oscilloscopes for real-time visualization. Virtual modular platforms such as , which achieved its stable 1.0 release in 2019, emulate hardware by allowing users to patch together modules for bespoke synthesis systems. Core advantages of software synthesizers stem from their digital nature, including effectively unlimited constrained only by processing power, enabling dense, multi-layered compositions without the voice limits of hardware. Preset via file formats promotes and rapid exchange, while seamless integration with CPU-based effects like reverbs and delays enhances workflow efficiency within DAWs. Portability is a key benefit, as entire setups require only a , and low costs—often under $200 or free—democratize access for independent producers. In professional contexts, tools like Spectrasonics Omnisphere have been employed in high-profile productions, such as those by for tracks, contributing to atmospheric and melodic elements. In the 2020s, software synthesizers have advanced toward greater versatility and expressivity. Cross-platform compatibility has expanded to web-based environments using the Web Audio API, allowing browser-accessible synthesis for interactive applications and quick prototyping without installations. Support for Polyphonic Expression (MPE) has become widespread, enabling per-note control of parameters like pitch bend and modulation in synths such as Serum 2 and Vital, fostering nuanced, gestural performance akin to acoustic instruments. These developments underscore software synths' role in making sophisticated synthesis accessible and portable for contemporary music creation.

Analog Clones and Hardware Revival

In the , clones have emerged as faithful recreations of classic designs from the 1970s, such as the Juno series, offering musicians access to vintage-inspired sounds at a fraction of the original cost. These hardware revivals stem from a desire to recapture the tactile experience and sonic character of early analog instruments, which serve as templates for contemporary builds. A prominent example is the , released in 2017 as a desktop module that emulates the polyphonic architecture and chorus effects of the , delivering 12 voices of analog synthesis with modern enhancements like integration for preset management. Similarly, the Modal Electronics Argon8, introduced in 2019, provides 8-voice polyphony through a hybrid design featuring digital wavetable oscillators paired with an analog multimode filter, positioning it as an accessible entry in the polyphonic hardware landscape. The popularity of these clones and revivals is driven by the perceived "warmth" of analog circuitry, which introduces subtle imperfections like nonlinear envelopes and oscillator drift, contrasting with the "sterile" precision often associated with digital synthesis. This organic quality, including distortions and tuning instabilities, fosters a more expressive and characterful sound that many producers find lacking in purely digital alternatives. In the , the trend has accelerated with new releases showcased at events like NAMM 2025, where announced the Pro-16, an updated take on the Sequential with expanded 16-voice and polyphonic aftertouch, aimed at broadening access to classic polysynth designs. Such developments reflect ongoing efforts to refine hardware for contemporary workflows while honoring aesthetics. The boutique scene has flourished alongside mass-market clones, with companies like facing legal challenges from original manufacturers such as and over design similarities in products like the System 100 replicas. Complementing this, the DIY ethos thrives through open-source projects, exemplified by Mutable Instruments' Eurorack modules, which provide schematics and assembly guides for users to build custom analog components like oscillators and filters. Market dynamics favor affordability, with entry-level analog clones now available under $500, such as Behringer's Model D, enabling newcomers to explore hardware without prohibitive costs. These instruments increasingly incorporate USB and connectivity for seamless integration with digital audio workstations and controllers, bridging analog revival with modern production environments.

AI Integration and Emerging Technologies

Since the early 2020s, has increasingly integrated into synthesizer design, particularly through neural networks that emulate the behavior of classic hardware instruments. Neural audio synthesis (NAS) models, which leverage to replicate analog signal paths, have enabled software synthesizers to more accurately mimic vintage hardware with unprecedented fidelity through techniques like timbre transfer. Generative AI tools have transformed synthesizer workflows by enabling rapid composition of electronic tracks from textual prompts. Platforms like Suno, launched in 2023, use diffusion-based models to generate full songs with synthesized vocals, , and structures, allowing users to ideate electronic music without traditional sequencing. Similarly, Udio, introduced around the same period, supports layer-by-layer generation for professional-grade compositions, including style transfers that adapt prompts to genres like or ambient. Soundverse AI extends this for electronic ideation, producing stems such as synth leads and basslines in seconds via its composition engine, tailored for producers seeking quick prototypes. Key features in AI-enhanced synthesizers include voice cloning and auto-mastering, integrated into plugins for seamless production. Voice cloning tools, such as those in Kits.AI or integrations, replicate artist-specific timbres by training on vocal samples, enabling real-time synthesis in DAWs. Auto-mastering plugins like iZotope AI analyze tracks to apply EQ, compression, and limiting automatically, optimizing for streaming platforms with minimal user input. AI timbre morphing further enriches synthesis, as seen in plugins like Neutone Morpho, which uses to resynthesize audio into new styles while retaining pitch and dynamics, or DDSP-VST for instrument-specific transformations. By 2025, ethical concerns surrounding AI in music synthesis have intensified, particularly regarding royalties and . Debates center on compensating artists whose works train generative models, with organizations like WIPO advocating for frameworks to attribute royalties to source datasets in AI outputs. Hardware innovations, such as Neural DSP's Quad Cortex and Nano Cortex pedals, incorporate neural capture technology to profile amp and synth behaviors in real-time, blending AI emulation with portable effects processing. Looking ahead, real-time learning synthesizers are emerging as a trend, with tools like Compiler AI, released in March 2025, enabling adaptive sound design that evolves based on user interactions, promising personalized, interactive creation environments.

References

  1. https://illumin.usc.edu/synthesizers-engineering-harmonies/
  2. https://cmtext.indiana.edu/synthesis/chapter4_synthesis_history.php
  3. https://www.amherst.edu/academiclife/departments/courses/1011F/MUSI/MUSI-04-1011F/finalprojects
  4. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/kna/Historical_View_Synthesizer_Development.html
  5. https://www.carnegielibrary.org/innovation-week-whats-synthesizer/
  6. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/synthesizer_n
  7. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1669&context=cmc_theses
  8. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~cc/pub/pdf/electronicInstruments.pdf
  9. https://www.ece.ucf.edu/seniordesign/fa2016sp2017/g28/uploads/1/0/5/1/105180779/sd_final_2.pdf
  10. https://spectrum.ieee.org/electronic-music
  11. https://music.arts.uci.edu/dobrian/maxcookbook/generate-classic-waveforms
  12. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/difference-between-waveforms
  13. https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/synth-school-part-2
  14. https://www.sweetwater.com/insync/synthesizer-basics-explained-with-audio-samples/
  15. https://blog.andertons.co.uk/learn/synth-101-a-guide-to-synthesizer-terminology
  16. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/synthesizer-polyphony
  17. https://yamahasynth.com/learn/synth-programming/subtractive-synthesis-101-part-two-going-from-static-to-dynamic/
  18. https://ethw.org/Telharmonium
  19. https://timara.oberlin.edu/the-telharmonium-thaddeus-cahill-oberlin-431/
  20. https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2010/12/this-month-in-physics-history
  21. https://paradiso.media.mit.edu/SpectrumWeb/SpectrumX.html
  22. https://moogfoundation.org/from-the-archives-moogtonium-discovered/
  23. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/6f6edd38-73d4-448d-80e0-6b5dd230cafc/602282.pdf
  24. https://ethw.org/RCA_Mark_I_and_Mark_II_Synthesizers
  25. https://magazine.columbia.edu/article/how-robert-moog-launched-music-electronic-age
  26. https://news.columbia.edu/news/computer-music-center-six-decades-creativity-and-technology
  27. https://cmtext.indiana.edu/history/chapter6_timeline.php
  28. https://120years.net/buchla-synthesisersdonald-buchlausa1963/
  29. https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2013/03/28/robert-moog-inducted-into-inventors-hall-of-fame/
  30. https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2014/10/11/50-years-of-the-moog-modular-synthesizer/
  31. https://www.attackmagazine.com/technique/hardware-focus/exploring-analogue-subtractive-synthesis-with-the-moog-mother-32/
  32. https://www.moogmusic.com/the-wave/switched-bach-how-world-met-moog/
  33. https://www.vintagesynth.com/buchla/100-series
  34. https://www.redbullmusicacademy.com/lectures/don-buchla-passing-the-acid-test/
  35. https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/arp-2500
  36. https://reverb.com/news/a-brief-history-of-the-arp-2500
  37. https://www.vice.com/en/article/at-81-the-godfather-of-the-synth-is-still-shaping-sound/
  38. https://www.moogmusic.com/synthesizers/minimoog-model-d/
  39. https://rmc.library.cornell.edu/moog/modtomini.php
  40. https://www.sweetwater.com/insync/arp-instruments-history/
  41. https://www.tomoberheim.com/historical-products
  42. https://www.mixonline.com/technology/1978-sequential-circuits-prophet-5-first-programmable-polyphonic-synth-383725
  43. https://pitchfork.com/features/lists-and-guides/9940-music-technology-of-the-1970s-a-timeline/
  44. https://nmc.emuseum.com/objects/283/patrick-moraz-double-minimoog
  45. https://hub.yamaha.com/keyboards/synthesizers/history-of-the-synthesizer-part-2/
  46. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4018121A/en
  47. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/sasp/Frequency_Modulation_FM_Synthesis.html
  48. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/people/john-chowning
  49. https://www.yamaha.com/en/tech-design/design/synapses/id_009
  50. https://midi.org/the-dawn-of-digital-synthesizers
  51. https://midi.org/midi-history-chapter-6-midi-begins-1981-1983
  52. https://midi.org/the-history-of-midi
  53. https://synthandsoftware.com/2019/09/historical-artifacts-the-roland-jupiter-8/
  54. https://120years.net/fairlight-computer-music-instrument-peter-vogel-kim-ryrie-australia-1979/
  55. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/context/gc_etds/article/3214/viewcontent/2017.07.06_lavengood.pdf
  56. https://www.nime.org/proceedings/2019/nime2019_paper066.pdf
  57. https://www.steinberg.net/technology/
  58. https://www.musicradar.com/reviews/tech/native-instruments-reaktor-5-5-277469
  59. https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/propellerhead-reason-6
  60. https://www.reasonstudios.com/about
  61. https://www.arturia.com/company/about-us
  62. https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/arturia-analog-factory
  63. https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/roland-jp8080
  64. https://www.korg.com/us/products/software/kc_triton/
  65. https://www.musicradar.com/music-tech/laptops-computers/it-provided-a-blueprint-for-the-ecosystem-we-swear-by-today-how-music-production-became-accessible-to-all-thanks-to-a-handful-of-innovators
  66. https://www.behringer.com/product.html?modelCode=0718-AAK
  67. https://www.gearnews.com/meet-the-clones-behringer/
  68. https://www.soundonsound.com/news/make-noise-introduce-multimod-module
  69. https://www.makenoisemusic.com/synthesizers-and-controllers/resynthesizer/
  70. https://www.technavio.com/report/music-synthesizers-market-industry-analysis
  71. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/modular-synthesizer-market
  72. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/animoog-z-synthesizer/id1586841361
  73. https://marketintelo.com/report/synthesizer-market
  74. https://www.moog.com/content/dam/moog/literature/Corporate/sustainability/sustainability-report-2024.pdf
  75. https://www.korg.com/uk/corporate/sustainability/
  76. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/what-is-subtractive-synthesis
  77. https://www.roland.com/uk/blog/guide-to-subtractive-synthesis/
  78. https://www.edmprod.com/subtractive-synthesis/
  79. https://audiomediainternational.com/gear-pioneers-moogs-synth-history/
  80. https://www.vintagesynth.com/moog/minimoog
  81. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/vintage-moog-modular-filters
  82. https://www.vintagesynth.com/arp/2600
  83. https://cymatics.fm/blogs/production/subtractive-synthesis
  84. https://karmafx.net/docs/karmafx_digitalfilters.pdf
  85. https://omegastudios.com/subtractive-vs-additive-synthesis/
  86. https://theneptunes.org/2024/07/wavetable-synthesis-vs-subtractive-synthesis-key-differences/
  87. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/clm/compmus/clm-tutorials/addsynth.html
  88. https://sites.music.columbia.edu/cmc/MusicAndComputers/chapter4/04_02.php
  89. https://120years.net/the-telharmonium-thaddeus-cahill-usa-1897/
  90. https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/introduction-additive-synthesis
  91. https://blog.native-instruments.com/what-is-additive-synthesis/
  92. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317746236_Synthesizers_A_Brief_Introduction
  93. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/what-is-wavetable-synthesis
  94. https://www.ableton.com/en/blog/new-wave-depth-look-wavetable/
  95. https://www.musicradar.com/news/ultimate-guide-wavetable-synthesis
  96. https://blog.native-instruments.com/what-is-wavetable-synthesis/
  97. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/courses/220a/static/jcFM73.pdf
  98. https://hub.yamaha.com/keyboards/synthesizers/discovering-digital-fm-john-chowning-remembers/
  99. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/casio-cz-series
  100. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/modern-fm-synthesis
  101. https://www.native-instruments.com/en/products/komplete/synths/fm8/
  102. https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse490s/11au/Readings/SynthesisChapt5b.pdf
  103. https://www.iannis-xenakis.org/en/granular-synthesis/
  104. http://www.granularsynthesis.com/hthesis/xenakis.html
  105. https://www.curtisroads.net/s/From-grains-to-forms.pdf
  106. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/what-is-granular-synthesis
  107. https://blog.native-instruments.com/granular-synthesis/
  108. https://old.iem.at/projekte/dsp/hammer/hammer.pdf
  109. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/what-is-physical-modeling
  110. https://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~karplus/papers/digitar.pdf
  111. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/clm/compmus/clm-tutorials/pm.html
  112. https://www.soundbridge.io/linear-arithmetic-la-synthesis
  113. https://www.ableton.com/en/packs/granulator/
  114. https://www.controlvoltage.net/blogs/channels/basic-synth-1-oscillators
  115. https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/projects/diy-synth-series-vco/
  116. https://learningmodular.com/glossary/1-voct/
  117. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/learning-synthesis-oscillators
  118. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/what-is-oscillator-sync
  119. https://sound.stackexchange.com/questions/35968/difference-between-multiple-voices-and-chorus
  120. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/all-about-direct-digital-synthesis.html
  121. https://www.digikey.com/en/articles/the-basics-of-direct-digital-synthesizers-ddss
  122. https://sdiy.info/wiki/Audio_synthesis_via_vacuum_tubes
  123. https://www.fabfilter.com/learn/synthesis-and-sound-design/basics-filters
  124. https://reverb.com/news/a-guide-to-synth-filter-types-ladders-steiner-parkers-and-more
  125. http://sdiy.org/destrukto/notes/moog_ladder_tf.pdf
  126. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/filters/
  127. https://tudl1086.home.xs4all.nl/synthcirc/filtpvoks/analogsynthfilter-ts271-mvoks4.pdf
  128. https://cmtext.indiana.edu/synthesis/chapter4_envelopes.php
  129. https://music.arts.uci.edu/dobrian/maxcookbook/how-adsr-object-works
  130. https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/introduction-vcas
  131. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/learning-synthesis-envelopes-1
  132. https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/more-about-envelopes
  133. https://web.mit.edu/6.101/www/s2017/projects/dominikm_Project_Final_Report.pdf
  134. https://blog.native-instruments.com/what-is-an-lfo/
  135. https://www.fabfilter.com/learn/synthesis-and-sound-design/modulation-lfos
  136. https://api.moogmusic.com/sites/default/files/2018-01/Minimoog_Model_D_Manual.pdf
  137. https://hub.yamaha.com/keyboards/synthesizers/history-of-the-synthesizer-part-1/
  138. https://www.sweetwater.com/c645--Electronic_Drum_Controllers_and_Multipads
  139. https://www.roland.com/us/products/rc_tb-303/
  140. https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/midi-basics-part-2
  141. https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/making-most-arpeggiators
  142. https://www.expressivee.com/3-touche-se
  143. https://www.musicradar.com/news/total-control-midi-controllers-mpe/4
  144. https://tunetempest.co.uk/rick-wakemans-keyboards/
  145. https://www.perfectcircuit.com/signal/synthesizers-of-prog
  146. https://www.kevinhartnell.com/it-was-40-years-ago-today-cars-by-gary-numan/
  147. https://dmlive.wiki/wiki/List_of_Depeche_Mode_sample_sources_by_album/The_Singles_81%E2%86%9285
  148. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/posts/la-et-ms-daft-punk-engineers-20140123-story.html
  149. https://audiomediainternational.com/deep-cuts-kraftwerk-synths/
  150. https://reverb.com/news/the-gear-of-classic-herbie-hancock-albums
  151. https://articles.roland.com/retracing-the-roland-sound-in-hip-hop/
  152. https://www.vintagesynth.com/roland/jupiter-8
  153. https://www.electronicsound.co.uk/features/long-reads/wendy-carlos-stanley-kubrick-and-a-clockwork-orange/
  154. https://www.vintagesynth.com/yamaha/cs-80
  155. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/3ryZCdlXtpkNG3yRl3Y7pnh/a-tribute-to-the-synth-how-synthesisers-revolutionised-modern-music
  156. https://reverb.com/news/the-synths-behind-8-classic-tv-theme-songs
  157. https://eefb.org/retrospectives/eduard-artemyevs-compositional-strategies/
  158. https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/scoring-horizon-zero-dawn
  159. https://beverlyboy.com/film-technology/synthetic-foley-ai-created-sound-effects/
  160. https://www.thevinylfactory.com/features/the-14-synthesizers-that-shaped-modern-music
  161. https://www.berklee.edu/careers/roles/synth-programmer
  162. https://www.synthswhen.com/hire/
  163. https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/music-technology-jobs-new-york
  164. https://www.thonk.co.uk/jobs/
  165. https://equipboard.com/posts/is-behringer-good
  166. https://www.attackmagazine.com/features/long-read/is-music-hardware-environmentally-sustainable/
  167. https://flossmanual.csound.com/introduction/preface
  168. https://www.musicradar.com/news/tech/xfer-records-releases-serum-the-dream-plugin-synth-607401
  169. https://vital.audio/
  170. https://bedroomproducersblog.com/2019/07/01/vcv-rack-1-0/
  171. https://musictech.com/news/music/finneas-production-techniques-synths-plugins/
  172. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Audio_API/Simple_synth
  173. https://roli.com/blog/7-free-mpe-soft-synths-we-love
  174. https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2017/09/06/behringer-deepmind-12d-synthesizer-review-demo/
  175. https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/analogue-revival
  176. https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2019/12/18/modal-argon8-wavetable-synthesizer-review/
  177. https://www.musicradar.com/music-tech/synths/were-here-to-break-the-barriers-and-put-powerful-instruments-into-the-hands-of-real-musicians-not-collectors-heres-the-2025-update-on-all-the-synths-and-drum-machines-that-behringer-has-announced-that-arent-in-the-shops-yet
  178. https://mutable-instruments.net/archive/
  179. https://www.musicradar.com/news/best-synthesizers
  180. https://www.gearnews.com/ai-synthesis-synth/
  181. https://arxiv.org/html/2503.11562v2
  182. https://suno.com/
  183. https://www.udio.com/
  184. https://www.soundverse.ai/
  185. https://www.soundverse.ai/blog/article/electronic-music-and-ai-in-2025-a-perfect-partnership
  186. https://www.kits.ai/blog/trends-in-music-production-ai
  187. https://www.mureka.ai/hub/aimusic/the-best-ai-plugins-for-music/
  188. https://neutone.ai/morpho
  189. https://magenta.withgoogle.com/ddsp-vst
  190. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-magazine/articles/royalties-in-the-age-of-ai-paying-artists-for-ai-generated-songs-73739
  191. https://neuraldsp.com/
  192. https://audiokitpro.com/compilerai/
  193. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7gdfZnEWUE
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.