Hubbry Logo
search
logo
Star
Star
current hub
2318190

Star

logo
Community Hub0 Subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

The Sun, a G-type main-sequence star, the closest to Earth

A star is a luminous spheroid of plasma held together by self-gravity.[1] The nearest star to Earth is the Sun. Many other stars are visible to the naked eye at night; their immense distances from Earth make them appear as fixed points of light. The most prominent stars have been categorised into constellations and asterisms, and many of the brightest stars have proper names. Astronomers have assembled star catalogues that identify the known stars and provide standardized stellar designations. The observable universe contains an estimated 1022 to 1024 stars. Only about 4,000 of these stars are visible to the naked eye—all within the Milky Way galaxy.[2]

A star's life begins with the gravitational collapse of a gaseous nebula of material largely comprising hydrogen, helium, and traces of heavier elements. Its total mass mainly determines its evolution and eventual fate. A star shines for most of its active life due to the thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium in its core. This process releases energy that traverses the star's interior and radiates into outer space. At the end of a star's lifetime, fusion ceases and its core becomes a stellar remnant: a white dwarf, a neutron star, or—if it is sufficiently massive—a black hole.

Stellar nucleosynthesis in stars or their remnants creates almost all naturally occurring chemical elements heavier than lithium. Stellar mass loss or supernova explosions return chemically enriched material to the interstellar medium. These elements are then recycled into new stars. Astronomers can determine stellar properties—including mass, age, metallicity (chemical composition), variability, distance, and motion through space—by carrying out observations of a star's apparent brightness, spectrum, and changes in its position in the sky over time.

Stars can form orbital systems with other astronomical objects, as in planetary systems and star systems with two or more stars. When two such stars orbit closely, their gravitational interaction can significantly impact their evolution. Stars can form part of a much larger gravitationally bound structure, such as a star cluster or a galaxy.

Etymology

[edit]

The English word star ultimately derives from the Proto-Indo-European root *h₂stḗr, also meaning 'star' – which is further analyzable as *h₂eh₁s- 'to burn' (also the source of the word ash) plus *-tēr (the agentive suffix). Its cognates in other languages include Latin stella, Greek aster, and German Stern;[3] further cognates in English include asterisk, asteroid, astral, constellation, and Esther.[4]

Observation history

[edit]
A 1690 depiction of the constellation of Leo the lion by Johannes Hevelius.[5]

Historically, stars have been important to civilizations throughout the world. They have been part of religious practices, divination rituals, mythology, used for celestial navigation and orientation, to mark the passage of seasons, and to define calendars.

Early astronomers recognized a difference between "fixed stars", whose position on the celestial sphere does not change, and "wandering stars" (planets), which move noticeably relative to the fixed stars over days or weeks.[6] Many ancient astronomers believed that the stars were permanently affixed to a heavenly sphere and that they were immutable. By convention, astronomers grouped prominent stars into asterisms and constellations and used them to track the motions of the planets and the inferred position of the Sun.[7] The motion of the Sun against the background stars (and the horizon) was used to create calendars, which could be used to regulate agricultural practices.[8] The Gregorian calendar, currently used nearly everywhere in the world, is a solar calendar based on the angle of the Earth's rotational axis relative to its local star, the Sun.

The oldest accurately dated star chart was the result of ancient Egyptian astronomy in 1534 BC.[9] The earliest known star catalogues were compiled by the ancient Babylonian astronomers of Mesopotamia in the late 2nd millennium BC, during the Kassite Period (c. 1531 BC – c. 1155 BC).[10]

Alternative text
Stars in the night sky

The first star catalogue in Greek astronomy was created by Aristillus in approximately 300 BC, with the help of Timocharis.[11] The star catalog of Hipparchus (2nd century BC) included 1,020 stars, and was used to assemble Ptolemy's star catalogue.[12] Hipparchus is known for the discovery of the first recorded nova (new star).[13] Many of the constellations and star names in use today derive from Greek astronomy.

Despite the apparent immutability of the heavens, Chinese astronomers were aware that new stars could appear.[14] In 185 AD, they were the first to observe and write about a supernova, now known as SN 185.[15] The brightest stellar event in recorded history was the SN 1006 supernova, which was observed in 1006 and written about by the Egyptian astronomer Ali ibn Ridwan and several Chinese astronomers.[16] The SN 1054 supernova, which gave birth to the Crab Nebula, was also observed by Chinese and Islamic astronomers.[17][18][19]

Medieval Islamic astronomers gave Arabic names to many stars that are still used today and they invented numerous astronomical instruments that could compute the positions of the stars. They built the first large observatory research institutes, mainly to produce Zij star catalogues.[20] Among these, the Book of Fixed Stars (964) was written by the Persian astronomer Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi, who observed a number of stars, star clusters (including the Omicron Velorum and Brocchi's Clusters) and galaxies (including the Andromeda Galaxy).[21] According to A. Zahoor, in the 11th century, the Persian polymath scholar Abu Rayhan Biruni described the Milky Way galaxy as a multitude of fragments having the properties of nebulous stars, and gave the latitudes of various stars during a lunar eclipse in 1019.[22]

According to Josep Puig, the Andalusian astronomer Ibn Bajjah proposed that the Milky Way was made up of many stars that almost touched one another and appeared to be a continuous image due to the effect of refraction from sublunary material, citing his observation of the conjunction of Jupiter and Mars on 500 AH (1106/1107 AD) as evidence.[23] Early European astronomers such as Tycho Brahe identified new stars in the night sky (later termed novae), suggesting that the heavens were not immutable. In 1584, Giordano Bruno suggested that the stars were like the Sun, and may have other planets, possibly even Earth-like, in orbit around them,[24] an idea that had been suggested earlier by the ancient Greek philosophers, Democritus and Epicurus,[25] and by medieval Islamic cosmologists[26] such as Fakhr al-Din al-Razi.[27] By the following century, the idea of the stars being the same as the Sun was reaching a consensus among astronomers. To explain why these stars exerted no net gravitational pull on the Solar System, Isaac Newton suggested that the stars were equally distributed in every direction, an idea prompted by the theologian Richard Bentley.[28]

The Italian astronomer Geminiano Montanari recorded observing variations in luminosity of the star Algol in 1667. Edmond Halley published the first measurements of the proper motion of a pair of nearby "fixed" stars, demonstrating that they had changed positions since the time of the ancient Greek astronomers Ptolemy and Hipparchus.[24]

William Herschel was the first astronomer to attempt to determine the distribution of stars in the sky. During the 1780s, he established a series of gauges in 600 directions and counted the stars observed along each line of sight. From this, he deduced that the number of stars steadily increased toward one side of the sky, in the direction of the Milky Way core. His son John Herschel repeated this study in the southern hemisphere and found a corresponding increase in the same direction.[29] In addition to his other accomplishments, William Herschel is noted for his discovery that some stars do not merely lie along the same line of sight, but are physical companions that form binary star systems.[30]

The science of stellar spectroscopy was pioneered by Joseph von Fraunhofer and Angelo Secchi. By comparing the spectra of stars such as Sirius to the Sun, they found differences in the strength and number of their absorption lines—the dark lines in stellar spectra caused by the atmosphere's absorption of specific frequencies. In 1865, Secchi began classifying stars into spectral types.[31] The modern version of the stellar classification scheme was developed by Annie J. Cannon during the early 1900s.[32]

The first direct measurement of the distance to a star (61 Cygni at 11.4 light-years) was made in 1838 by Friedrich Bessel using the parallax technique. Parallax measurements demonstrated the vast separation of the stars in the heavens.[24] Observation of double stars gained increasing importance during the 19th century. In 1834, Friedrich Bessel observed changes in the proper motion of the star Sirius and inferred a hidden companion. Edward Pickering discovered the first spectroscopic binary in 1899 when he observed the periodic splitting of the spectral lines of the star Mizar in a 104-day period. Detailed observations of many binary star systems were collected by astronomers such as Friedrich Georg Wilhelm von Struve and S. W. Burnham, allowing the masses of stars to be determined from computation of orbital elements. The first solution to the problem of deriving an orbit of binary stars from telescope observations was made by Felix Savary in 1827.[33]

The twentieth century saw increasingly rapid advances in the scientific study of stars. The photograph became a valuable astronomical tool. Karl Schwarzschild discovered that the color of a star and, hence, its temperature, could be determined by comparing the visual magnitude against the photographic magnitude. The development of the photoelectric photometer allowed precise measurements of magnitude at multiple wavelength intervals. In 1921 Albert A. Michelson made the first measurements of a stellar diameter using an interferometer on the Hooker telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory.[34]

Important theoretical work on the physical structure of stars occurred during the first decades of the twentieth century. In 1913, the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram was developed, propelling the astrophysical study of stars. Successful models were developed to explain the interiors of stars and stellar evolution. Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin first proposed that stars were made primarily of hydrogen and helium in her 1925 PhD thesis.[35] The spectra of stars were further understood through advances in quantum physics. This allowed the chemical composition of the stellar atmosphere to be determined.[36]

Spitzer Space Telescope infrared image showing a multitude of stars in the Milky Way galaxy

With the exception of rare events such as supernovae and supernova impostors, individual stars have primarily been observed in the Local Group,[37] and especially in the visible part of the Milky Way (as demonstrated by the detailed star catalogues available for the Milky Way galaxy) and its satellites.[38] Individual stars such as Cepheid variables have been observed in the M87[39] and M100 galaxies of the Virgo Cluster,[40] as well as luminous stars in some other relatively nearby galaxies.[41] With the aid of gravitational lensing, a single star (named Icarus) has been observed at 9 billion light-years away.[42][43]

Designations

[edit]

The concept of a constellation was known to exist during the Babylonian period. Ancient sky watchers imagined that prominent arrangements of stars formed patterns, and they associated these with particular aspects of nature or their myths. Twelve of these formations lay along the band of the ecliptic and these became the basis of astrology.[44] Many of the more prominent individual stars were given names, particularly with Arabic or Latin designations.

As well as certain constellations and the Sun itself, individual stars have their own myths.[45] To the Ancient Greeks, some "stars", known as planets (Greek πλανήτης (planētēs), meaning "wanderer"), represented various important deities, from which the names of the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were taken.[45] (Uranus and Neptune were Greek and Roman gods, but neither planet was known in Antiquity because of their low brightness. Their names were assigned by later astronomers.)

Circa 1600, the names of the constellations were used to name the stars in the corresponding regions of the sky. The German astronomer Johann Bayer created a series of star maps and applied Greek letters as designations to the stars in each constellation. Later a numbering system based on the star's right ascension was invented and added to John Flamsteed's star catalogue in his book "Historia coelestis Britannica" (the 1712 edition), whereby this numbering system came to be called Flamsteed designation or Flamsteed numbering.[46][47]

The internationally recognized authority for naming celestial bodies is the International Astronomical Union (IAU).[48] The International Astronomical Union maintains the Working Group on Star Names (WGSN)[49] which catalogs and standardizes proper names for stars.[50] A number of private companies sell names of stars which are not recognized by the IAU, professional astronomers, or the amateur astronomy community.[51] The British Library calls this an unregulated commercial enterprise,[52][53] and the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection issued a violation against one such star-naming company for engaging in a deceptive trade practice.[54][55]

Units of measurement

[edit]

Although stellar parameters can be expressed in SI units or Gaussian units, it is often most convenient to express mass, luminosity, and radii in solar units, based on the characteristics of the Sun. In 2015, the IAU defined a set of nominal solar values (defined as SI constants, without uncertainties) which can be used for quoting stellar parameters:

nominal solar luminosity L = 3.828×1026 W[56]
nominal solar radius R = 6.957×108 m[56]

The solar mass M was not explicitly defined by the IAU due to the large relative uncertainty (10−4) of the Newtonian constant of gravitation G. Since the product of the Newtonian constant of gravitation and solar mass together (GM) has been determined to much greater precision, the IAU defined the nominal solar mass parameter to be:

nominal solar mass parameter: GM = 1.3271244×1020 m3/s2[56]

The nominal solar mass parameter can be combined with the most recent (2014) CODATA estimate of the Newtonian constant of gravitation G to derive the solar mass to be approximately 1.9885×1030 kg. Although the exact values for the luminosity, radius, mass parameter, and mass may vary slightly in the future due to observational uncertainties, the 2015 IAU nominal constants will remain the same SI values as they remain useful measures for quoting stellar parameters.

Large lengths, such as the radius of a giant star or the semi-major axis of a binary star system, are often expressed in terms of the astronomical unit—approximately equal to the mean distance between the Earth and the Sun (150 million km or approximately 93 million miles). In 2012, the IAU defined the astronomical constant to be an exact length in meters: 149,597,870,700 m.[56]

Formation and evolution

[edit]
Stellar evolution of low-mass (left cycle) and high-mass (right cycle) stars, with examples in italics
Size comparison (radius and mass) of a red dwarf, the Sun, a supermassive blue supergiant, and a red giant

Stars condense from regions of space of higher matter density, yet those regions are less dense than within a vacuum chamber. These regions—known as molecular clouds—consist mostly of hydrogen, with about 23 to 28 percent helium and a few percent heavier elements. One example of such a star-forming region is the Orion Nebula.[57] Most stars form in groups of dozens to hundreds of thousands of stars.[58] Massive stars in these groups may powerfully illuminate those clouds, ionizing the hydrogen, and creating H II regions. Such feedback effects, from star formation, may ultimately disrupt the cloud and prevent further star formation.[59] All stars spend the majority of their existence as main-sequence stars, fueled primarily by the nuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium within their cores. However, stars of different masses have markedly different properties at various stages of their development. The ultimate fate of more massive stars differs from that of less massive stars, as do their luminosities and the impact they have on their environment. Accordingly, astronomers often group stars by their mass:[60]

  • Very low mass stars, with masses below 0.5 M, are fully convective and distribute helium evenly throughout the whole star while on the main sequence. Therefore, they never undergo shell burning and never become red giants. After exhausting their hydrogen they become helium white dwarfs and slowly cool.[61] As the lifetime of 0.5 M stars is longer than the age of the universe, no such star has yet reached the white dwarf stage.
  • Low mass stars (including the Sun), with a mass between 0.5 M and ~2.25 M depending on composition, do become red giants as their core hydrogen is depleted and they begin to burn helium in core in a helium flash; they develop a degenerate carbon-oxygen core later on the asymptotic giant branch; they finally blow off their outer shell as a planetary nebula and leave behind their core in the form of a white dwarf.[62][63]
  • Intermediate-mass stars, between ~2.25 M and ~8 M, pass through evolutionary stages similar to low mass stars, but after a relatively short period on the red-giant branch they ignite helium without a flash and spend an extended period in the red clump before forming a degenerate carbon-oxygen core.[62][63]
  • Massive stars generally have a minimum mass of ~8 M.[64] After exhausting the hydrogen at the core these stars become supergiants and go on to fuse elements heavier than helium. Many end their lives when their cores collapse and they explode as supernovae.[62][65]

Star formation

[edit]
Artist's conception of the birth of a star within a dense molecular cloud
A cluster of approximately 500 young stars lies within the nearby W40 stellar nursery.

The formation of a star begins with gravitational instability within a molecular cloud, caused by regions of higher density—often triggered by compression of clouds by radiation from massive stars, expanding bubbles in the interstellar medium, the collision of different molecular clouds, or the collision of galaxies (as in a starburst galaxy).[66][67] When a region reaches a sufficient density of matter to satisfy the criteria for Jeans instability, it begins to collapse under its own gravitational force.[68]

As the cloud collapses, individual conglomerations of dense dust and gas form "Bok globules". As a globule collapses and the density increases, the gravitational energy converts into heat and the temperature rises. When the protostellar cloud has approximately reached the stable condition of hydrostatic equilibrium, a protostar forms at the core.[69] These pre-main-sequence stars are often surrounded by a protoplanetary disk and powered mainly by the conversion of gravitational energy. The period of gravitational contraction lasts about 10 million years for a star like the sun, up to 100 million years for a red dwarf.[70]

Early stars of less than 2 M are called T Tauri stars, while those with greater mass are Herbig Ae/Be stars. These newly formed stars emit jets of gas along their axis of rotation, which may reduce the angular momentum of the collapsing star and result in small patches of nebulosity known as Herbig–Haro objects.[71][72] These jets, in combination with radiation from nearby massive stars, may help to drive away the surrounding cloud from which the star was formed.[73]

Early in their development, T Tauri stars follow the Hayashi track—they contract and decrease in luminosity while remaining at roughly the same temperature. Less massive T Tauri stars follow this track to the main sequence, while more massive stars turn onto the Henyey track.[74]

Most stars are observed to be members of binary star systems, and the properties of those binaries are the result of the conditions in which they formed.[75] A gas cloud must lose its angular momentum in order to collapse and form a star. The fragmentation of the cloud into multiple stars distributes some of that angular momentum. The primordial binaries transfer some angular momentum by gravitational interactions during close encounters with other stars in young stellar clusters. These interactions tend to split apart more widely separated (soft) binaries while causing hard binaries to become more tightly bound. This produces the separation of binaries into their two observed populations distributions.[76]

Main sequence

[edit]

Stars spend about 90% of their lifetimes fusing hydrogen into helium in high-temperature-and-pressure reactions in their cores. Such stars are said to be on the main sequence and are called dwarf stars. Starting at zero-age main sequence, the proportion of helium in a star's core will steadily increase, the rate of nuclear fusion at the core will slowly increase, as will the star's temperature and luminosity.[77] The Sun, for example, is estimated to have increased in luminosity by about 40% since it reached the main sequence 4.6 billion (4.6×109) years ago.[78]

Every star generates a stellar wind of particles that causes a continual outflow of gas into space. For most stars, the mass lost is negligible. The Sun loses 10−14 M every year,[79] or about 0.01% of its total mass over its entire lifespan. However, very massive stars can lose 10−7 to 10−5 M each year, significantly affecting their evolution.[80] Stars that begin with more than 50 M can lose over half their total mass while on the main sequence.[81]

An example of a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram for a set of stars that includes the Sun (center) (see Classification)

The time a star spends on the main sequence depends primarily on the amount of fuel it has and the rate at which it fuses it. The Sun is expected to live 10 billion (1010) years. Massive stars consume their fuel very rapidly and are short-lived. Low mass stars consume their fuel very slowly. Stars less massive than 0.25 M, called red dwarfs, are able to fuse nearly all of their mass while stars of about 1 M can only fuse about 10% of their mass. The combination of their slow fuel-consumption and relatively large usable fuel supply allows low mass stars to last about one trillion (10×1012) years; the most extreme of 0.08 M will last for about 12 trillion years. Red dwarfs become hotter and more luminous as they accumulate helium. When they eventually run out of hydrogen, they contract into a white dwarf and decline in temperature.[61] Since the lifespan of such stars is greater than the current age of the universe (13.8 billion years), no stars under about 0.85 M[82] are expected to have moved off the main sequence.

Besides mass, the elements heavier than helium can play a significant role in the evolution of stars. Astronomers label all elements heavier than helium "metals", and call the chemical concentration of these elements in a star, its metallicity. A star's metallicity can influence the time the star takes to burn its fuel, and controls the formation of its magnetic fields,[83] which affects the strength of its stellar wind.[84] Older, population II stars have substantially less metallicity than the younger, population I stars due to the composition of the molecular clouds from which they formed. Over time, such clouds become increasingly enriched in heavier elements as older stars die and shed portions of their atmospheres.[85]

Post–main sequence

[edit]
Betelgeuse as seen by ALMA. This is the first time that ALMA has observed the surface of a star and resulted in the highest-resolution image of Betelgeuse available.

As stars of at least 0.4 M[86] exhaust the supply of hydrogen at their core, they start to fuse hydrogen in a shell surrounding the helium core. The outer layers of the star expand and cool greatly as they transition into a red giant. In some cases, they will fuse heavier elements at the core or in shells around the core. As the stars expand, they throw part of their mass, enriched with those heavier elements, into the interstellar environment, to be recycled later as new stars.[87] In about 5 billion years, when the Sun enters the helium burning phase, it will expand to a maximum radius of roughly 1 astronomical unit (150 million kilometres), 250 times its present size, and lose 30% of its current mass.[78][88]

As the hydrogen-burning shell produces more helium, the core increases in mass and temperature. In a red giant of up to 2.25 M, the mass of the helium core becomes degenerate prior to helium fusion. Finally, when the temperature increases sufficiently, core helium fusion begins explosively in what is called a helium flash, and the star rapidly shrinks in radius, increases its surface temperature, and moves to the horizontal branch of the HR diagram. For more massive stars, helium core fusion starts before the core becomes degenerate, and the star spends some time in the red clump, slowly burning helium, before the outer convective envelope collapses and the star then moves to the horizontal branch.[89]

After a star has fused the helium of its core, it begins fusing helium along a shell surrounding the hot carbon core. The star then follows an evolutionary path called the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) that parallels the other described red-giant phase, but with a higher luminosity. The more massive AGB stars may undergo a brief period of carbon fusion before the core becomes degenerate. During the AGB phase, stars undergo thermal pulses due to instabilities in the core of the star. In these thermal pulses, the luminosity of the star varies and matter is ejected from the star's atmosphere, ultimately forming a planetary nebula. As much as 50 to 70% of a star's mass can be ejected in this mass loss process. Because energy transport in an AGB star is primarily by convection, this ejected material is enriched with the fusion products dredged up from the core. Therefore, the planetary nebula is enriched with elements like carbon and oxygen. Ultimately, the planetary nebula disperses, enriching the general interstellar medium.[90] Therefore, future generations of stars are made of the "star stuff" from past stars.[91]

Massive stars

[edit]
Onion-like layers at the core of a massive, evolved star just before core collapse

During their helium-burning phase, a star of more than 9 solar masses expands to form first a blue supergiant and then a red supergiant. Particularly massive stars (exceeding 40 solar masses, like Alnilam, the central blue supergiant of Orion's Belt)[92] do not become red supergiants due to high mass loss.[93] These may instead evolve to a Wolf–Rayet star, characterised by spectra dominated by emission lines of elements heavier than hydrogen, which have reached the surface due to strong convection and intense mass loss, or from stripping of the outer layers.[94]

When helium is exhausted at the core of a massive star, the core contracts and the temperature and pressure rises enough to fuse carbon (see Carbon-burning process). This process continues, with the successive stages being fueled by neon (see neon-burning process), oxygen (see oxygen-burning process), and silicon (see silicon-burning process). Near the end of the star's life, fusion continues along a series of onion-layer shells within a massive star. Each shell fuses a different element, with the outermost shell fusing hydrogen; the next shell fusing helium, and so forth.[95]

The final stage occurs when a massive star begins producing iron. Since iron nuclei are more tightly bound than any heavier nuclei, any fusion beyond iron does not produce a net release of energy.[96]

Some massive stars, particularly luminous blue variables, are very unstable to the extent that they violently shed their mass into space in events known as supernova impostors, becoming significantly brighter in the process. Eta Carinae is known for having undergone a supernova impostor event, the Great Eruption, in the 19th century.

Collapse

[edit]

As a star's core shrinks, the intensity of radiation from that surface increases, creating such radiation pressure on the outer shell of gas that it will push those layers away, forming a planetary nebula. If what remains after the outer atmosphere has been shed is less than roughly 1.4 M, it shrinks to a relatively tiny object about the size of Earth, known as a white dwarf. White dwarfs lack the mass for further gravitational compression to take place.[97] The electron-degenerate matter inside a white dwarf is no longer a plasma. Eventually, white dwarfs fade into black dwarfs over a very long period of time.[98]

The Crab Nebula, remnants of a supernova that was first observed around 1050 AD

In massive stars, fusion continues until the iron core has grown so large (more than 1.4 M) that it can no longer support its own mass. This core will suddenly collapse as its electrons are driven into its protons, forming neutrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays in a burst of electron capture and inverse beta decay. The shockwave formed by this sudden collapse causes the rest of the star to explode in a supernova. Supernovae become so bright that they may briefly outshine the star's entire home galaxy. When they occur within the Milky Way, supernovae have historically been observed by naked-eye observers as "new stars" where none seemingly existed before.[99]

A supernova explosion blows away the star's outer layers, leaving a remnant such as the Crab Nebula.[99] The core is compressed into a neutron star, which sometimes manifests itself as a pulsar or X-ray burster. In the case of the largest stars, the remnant is a black hole greater than 4 M.[100] In a neutron star the matter is in a state known as neutron-degenerate matter, with a more exotic form of degenerate matter, QCD matter, possibly present in the core.[101]

The blown-off outer layers of dying stars include heavy elements, which may be recycled during the formation of new stars. These heavy elements allow the formation of rocky planets. The outflow from supernovae and the stellar wind of large stars play an important part in shaping the interstellar medium.[99]

Binary stars

[edit]

Binary stars' evolution may significantly differ from that of single stars of the same mass. For example, when any star expands to become a red giant, it may overflow its Roche lobe, the surrounding region where material is gravitationally bound to it; if stars in a binary system are close enough, some of that material may overflow to the other star, yielding phenomena including contact binaries, common-envelope binaries, cataclysmic variables, blue stragglers,[102] and type Ia supernovae. Mass transfer leads to cases such as the Algol paradox, where the most-evolved star in a system is the least massive.[103]

The evolution of binary star and higher-order star systems is intensely researched since so many stars have been found to be members of binary systems. Around half of Sun-like stars, and an even higher proportion of more massive stars, form in multiple systems, and this may greatly influence such phenomena as novae and supernovae, the formation of certain types of star, and the enrichment of space with nucleosynthesis products.[104]

The influence of binary star evolution on the formation of evolved massive stars such as luminous blue variables, Wolf–Rayet stars, and the progenitors of certain classes of core collapse supernova is still disputed. Single massive stars may be unable to expel their outer layers fast enough to form the types and numbers of evolved stars that are observed, or to produce progenitors that would explode as the supernovae that are observed. Mass transfer through gravitational stripping in binary systems is seen by some astronomers as the solution to that problem.[105][106][107]

Distribution

[edit]
Artist's impression of the Sirius system, a white dwarf star in orbit around an A-type main-sequence star

Stars are not spread uniformly across the universe but are normally grouped into galaxies along with interstellar gas and dust. A typical large galaxy like the Milky Way contains hundreds of billions of stars. There are more than 2 trillion (1012) galaxies, though most are less than 10% the mass of the Milky Way.[108] Overall, there are likely to be between 1022 and 1024 stars,[109][110] which are more stars than all the grains of sand on planet Earth.[111][112][113] Most stars are within galaxies, but between 10 and 50% of the starlight in large galaxy clusters may come from stars outside of any galaxy.[114][115][116]

A multi-star system consists of two or more gravitationally bound stars that orbit each other. The simplest and most common multi-star system is a binary star, but systems of three or more stars exist. For reasons of orbital stability, such multi-star systems are often organized into hierarchical sets of binary stars.[117] Larger groups are called star clusters. These range from loose stellar associations with only a few stars to open clusters with dozens to thousands of stars, up to enormous globular clusters with hundreds of thousands of stars. Such systems orbit their host galaxy. The stars in an open or globular cluster all formed from the same giant molecular cloud, so all members normally have similar ages and compositions.[90]

Many stars are observed, and most or all may have originally formed in gravitationally bound, multiple-star systems. This is particularly true for very massive O and B class stars, 80% of which are believed to be part of multiple-star systems. The proportion of single star systems increases with decreasing star mass, so that only 25% of red dwarfs are known to have stellar companions. As 85% of all stars are red dwarfs, more than two thirds of stars in the Milky Way are likely single red dwarfs.[118] In a 2017 study of the Perseus molecular cloud, astronomers found that most of the newly formed stars are in binary systems. In the model that best explained the data, all stars initially formed as binaries, though some binaries later split up and leave single stars behind.[119][120]

This view of NGC 6397 includes stars known as blue stragglers for their location on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram.

The nearest star to the Earth, apart from the Sun, is Proxima Centauri, 4.2465 light-years (40.175 trillion kilometres) away. Travelling at the orbital speed of the Space Shuttle, 8 kilometres per second (29,000 kilometres per hour), it would take about 150,000 years to arrive.[121] This is typical of stellar separations in galactic discs.[122] Stars can be much closer to each other in the centres of galaxies[123] and in globular clusters,[124] or much farther apart in galactic halos.[125]

Due to the relatively vast distances between stars outside the galactic nucleus, collisions between stars are thought to be rare. In denser regions such as the core of globular clusters or the galactic center, collisions can be more common.[126] Such collisions can produce what are known as blue stragglers. These abnormal stars have higher surface temperatures and thus are bluer than stars at the main sequence turnoff in the cluster to which they belong; in standard stellar evolution, blue stragglers would already have evolved off the main sequence and thus would not be seen in the cluster.[127]

Characteristics

[edit]

Almost everything about a star is determined by its initial mass, including such characteristics as luminosity, size, evolution, lifespan, and its eventual fate.

Age

[edit]

Most stars are between 1 billion and 10 billion years old. Some stars may even be close to 13.8 billion years old—the observed age of the universe. The oldest star yet discovered, HD 140283, nicknamed Methuselah star, is an estimated 14.46 ± 0.8 billion years old.[128] (Due to the uncertainty in the value, this age for the star does not conflict with the age of the universe, determined by the Planck satellite as 13.799 ± 0.021).[128][129]

The more massive the star, the shorter its lifespan, primarily because massive stars have greater pressure on their cores, causing them to burn hydrogen more rapidly. The most massive stars last an average of a few million years, while stars of minimum mass (red dwarfs) burn their fuel very slowly and can last tens to hundreds of billions of years.[130][131]

Lifetimes of stages of stellar evolution in billions of years[132]
Initial Mass (M) Main Sequence Subgiant First Red Giant Core He Burning
1.0 9.33 2.57 0.76 0.13
1.6 2.28 0.03 0.12 0.13
2.0 1.20 0.01 0.02 0.28
5.0 0.10 0.0004 0.0003 0.02

Chemical composition

[edit]

When stars form in the present Milky Way galaxy, they are composed of about 71% hydrogen and 27% helium,[133] as measured by mass, with a small fraction of heavier elements. Typically the portion of heavy elements is measured in terms of the iron content of the stellar atmosphere, as iron is a common element and its absorption lines are relatively easy to measure. The portion of heavier elements may be an indicator of the likelihood that the star has a planetary system.[134]

As of 2005 the star with the lowest iron content ever measured is the dwarf HE1327-2326, with only 1/200,000th the iron content of the Sun.[135] By contrast, the super-metal-rich star μ Leonis has nearly double the abundance of iron as the Sun, while the planet-bearing star 14 Herculis has nearly triple the iron.[136] Chemically peculiar stars show unusual abundances of certain elements in their spectrum; especially chromium and rare earth elements.[137] Stars with cooler outer atmospheres, including the Sun, can form various diatomic and polyatomic molecules.[138]

Size comparison of some well-known supergiant and hypergiant stars, featuring Cygnus OB2-12, V382 Carinae, Betelgeuse, VV Cephei, and VY Canis Majoris

Diameter

[edit]

Due to their great distance from the Earth, all stars except the Sun appear to the unaided eye as shining points in the night sky that twinkle because of the effect of the Earth's atmosphere. The Sun is close enough to the Earth to appear as a disk instead, and to provide daylight. Other than the Sun, the star with the largest apparent size is R Doradus, with an angular diameter of only 0.057 arcseconds.[139]

The disks of most stars are much too small in angular size to be observed with current ground-based optical telescopes, so interferometer telescopes are required to produce images of these objects. Another technique for measuring the angular size of stars is through occultation. By precisely measuring the drop in brightness of a star as it is occulted by the Moon (or the rise in brightness when it reappears), the star's angular diameter can be computed.[140]

Stars range in size from neutron stars, which vary anywhere from 20 to 40 km (25 mi) in diameter, to supergiants like Betelgeuse in the Orion constellation, which has a diameter about 640 times that of the Sun[141] with a much lower density.[142]

Kinematics

[edit]
The Pleiades, an open cluster of stars in the constellation of Taurus. These stars share a common motion through space.[143]

The motion of a star relative to the Sun can provide useful information about the origin and age of a star, as well as the structure and evolution of the surrounding galaxy.[144] The components of motion of a star consist of the radial velocity toward or away from the Sun, and the traverse angular movement, which is called its proper motion.[145]

Radial velocity is measured by the doppler shift of the star's spectral lines and is given in units of km/s. The proper motion of a star, its parallax, is determined by precise astrometric measurements in units of milli-arc seconds (mas) per year. With knowledge of the star's parallax and its distance, the proper motion velocity can be calculated. Together with the radial velocity, the total velocity can be calculated. Stars with high rates of proper motion are likely to be relatively close to the Sun, making them good candidates for parallax measurements.[146]

When both rates of movement are known, the space velocity of the star relative to the Sun or the galaxy can be computed. Among nearby stars, it has been found that younger population I stars have generally lower velocities than older, population II stars. The latter have elliptical orbits that are inclined to the plane of the galaxy.[147] A comparison of the kinematics of nearby stars has allowed astronomers to trace their origin to common points in giant molecular clouds; such groups with common points of origin are referred to as stellar associations.[148]

Magnetic field

[edit]
Surface magnetic field of SU Aur (a young star of T Tauri type), reconstructed by means of Zeeman–Doppler imaging

The magnetic field of a star is generated within regions of the interior where convective circulation occurs. This movement of conductive plasma functions like a dynamo, wherein the movement of electrical charges induce magnetic fields, as does a mechanical dynamo. Those magnetic fields have a great range that extend throughout and beyond the star. The strength of the magnetic field varies with the mass and composition of the star, and the amount of magnetic surface activity depends upon the star's rate of rotation. This surface activity produces starspots, which are regions of strong magnetic fields and lower than normal surface temperatures. Coronal loops are arching magnetic field flux lines that rise from a star's surface into the star's outer atmosphere, its corona. The coronal loops can be seen due to the plasma they conduct along their length. Stellar flares are bursts of high-energy particles that are emitted due to the same magnetic activity.[149]

Young, rapidly rotating stars tend to have high levels of surface activity because of their magnetic field. The magnetic field can act upon a star's stellar wind, functioning as a brake to gradually slow the rate of rotation with time. Thus, older stars such as the Sun have a much slower rate of rotation and a lower level of surface activity. The activity levels of slowly rotating stars tend to vary in a cyclical manner and can shut down altogether for periods of time.[150] During the Maunder Minimum, for example, the Sun underwent a 70-year period with almost no sunspot activity.[151]

Mass

[edit]

Stars have masses ranging from less than half the solar mass to over 200 solar masses (see List of most massive stars). One of the most massive stars known is Eta Carinae,[152] which, with 100–150 times as much mass as the Sun, will have a lifespan of only several million years. Studies of the most massive open clusters suggests 150 M as a rough upper limit for stars in the current era of the universe.[153] This represents an empirical value for the theoretical limit on the mass of forming stars due to increasing radiation pressure on the accreting gas cloud. Several stars in the R136 cluster in the Large Magellanic Cloud have been measured with larger masses,[154] but it has been determined that they could have been created through the collision and merger of massive stars in close binary systems, sidestepping the 150 M limit on massive star formation.[155]

The reflection nebula NGC 1999 is brilliantly illuminated by V380 Orionis. The black patch of sky is a vast hole of empty space and not a dark nebula as previously thought.

The first stars to form after the Big Bang may have been larger, up to 300 M,[156] due to the complete absence of elements heavier than lithium in their composition. This generation of supermassive population III stars is likely to have existed in the very early universe (i.e., they are observed to have a high redshift), and may have started the production of chemical elements heavier than hydrogen that are needed for the later formation of planets and life. In June 2015, astronomers reported evidence for Population III stars in the Cosmos Redshift 7 galaxy at z = 6.60.[157][158]

With a mass only 80 times that of Jupiter (MJ), 2MASS J0523-1403 is the smallest known star undergoing nuclear fusion in its core.[159] For stars with metallicity similar to the Sun, the theoretical minimum mass the star can have and still undergo fusion at the core, is estimated to be about 75 MJ.[160][161] When the metallicity is very low, the minimum star size seems to be about 8.3% of the solar mass, or about 87 MJ.[161][162] Smaller bodies called brown dwarfs, occupy a poorly defined grey area between stars and gas giants.[160][161]

The combination of the radius and the mass of a star determines its surface gravity. Giant stars have much lower surface gravity than do main-sequence stars, while the opposite is the case for degenerate, compact stars such as white dwarfs. The surface gravity can influence the appearance of a star's spectrum, with higher gravity causing a broadening of the absorption lines.[36]

Rotation

[edit]

The rotation rate of stars can be determined through spectroscopic measurement, or more exactly determined by tracking their starspots. Young stars can have a rotation greater than 100 km/s at the equator. The B-class star Achernar, for example, has an equatorial velocity of about 225 km/s or greater, causing its equator to bulge outward and giving it an equatorial diameter that is more than 50% greater than between the poles. This rate of rotation is just below the critical velocity of 300 km/s at which speed the star would break apart.[163] By contrast, the Sun rotates once every 25–35 days depending on latitude,[164] with an equatorial velocity of 1.93 km/s.[165] A main-sequence star's magnetic field and the stellar wind serve to slow its rotation by a significant amount as it evolves on the main sequence.[166]

Degenerate stars have contracted into a compact mass, resulting in a rapid rate of rotation. However they have relatively low rates of rotation compared to what would be expected by conservation of angular momentum—the tendency of a rotating body to compensate for a contraction in size by increasing its rate of spin. A large portion of the star's angular momentum is dissipated as a result of mass loss through the stellar wind.[167] In spite of this, the rate of rotation for a pulsar can be very rapid. The pulsar at the heart of the Crab nebula, for example, rotates 30 times per second.[168] The rotation rate of the pulsar will gradually slow due to the emission of radiation.[169]

Temperature

[edit]

The surface temperature of a main-sequence star is determined by the rate of energy production of its core and by its radius, and is often estimated from the star's color index.[170] The temperature is normally given in terms of an effective temperature, which is the temperature of an idealized black body that radiates its energy at the same luminosity per surface area as the star. The effective temperature is only representative of the surface, as the temperature increases toward the core.[171] The temperature in the core region of a star is several million kelvins.[172]

The stellar temperature will determine the rate of ionization of various elements, resulting in characteristic absorption lines in the spectrum. The surface temperature of a star, along with its visual absolute magnitude and absorption features, is used to classify a star (see classification below).[36]

Massive main-sequence stars can have surface temperatures of 50,000 K. Smaller stars such as the Sun have surface temperatures of a few thousand K. Red giants have relatively low surface temperatures of about 3,600 K; but they have a high luminosity due to their large exterior surface area.[173]

Radiation

[edit]
Eta Carinae is an unstable blue hypergiant star, roughly 100 times more massive than the Sun, over 700 times wider, and 4 million times more luminous. In a 19th century event termed the Great Eruption, Eta Carinae brightened and violently ejected mass to form the surrounding Homunculus Nebula (pictured).

The energy produced by stars, a product of nuclear fusion, radiates to space as both electromagnetic radiation and particle radiation. The particle radiation emitted by a star is manifested as the stellar wind,[174] which streams from the outer layers as electrically charged protons and alpha and beta particles. A steady stream of almost massless neutrinos emanate directly from the star's core.[175]

The production of energy at the core is the reason stars shine so brightly: every time two or more atomic nuclei fuse together to form a single atomic nucleus of a new heavier element, gamma ray photons are released from the nuclear fusion product. This energy is converted to other forms of electromagnetic energy of lower frequency, such as visible light, by the time it reaches the star's outer layers.[176]

The color of a star, as determined by the most intense frequency of the visible light, depends on the temperature of the star's outer layers, including its photosphere.[177] Besides visible light, stars emit forms of electromagnetic radiation that are invisible to the human eye. In fact, stellar electromagnetic radiation spans the entire electromagnetic spectrum, from the longest wavelengths of radio waves through infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, to the shortest of X-rays, and gamma rays. From the standpoint of total energy emitted by a star, not all components of stellar electromagnetic radiation are significant, but all frequencies provide insight into the star's physics.[175]

Using the stellar spectrum, astronomers can determine the surface temperature, surface gravity, metallicity and rotational velocity of a star. If the distance of the star is found, such as by measuring the parallax, then the luminosity of the star can be derived. The mass, radius, surface gravity, and rotation period can then be estimated based on stellar models. (Mass can be calculated for stars in binary systems by measuring their orbital velocities and distances. Gravitational microlensing has been used to measure the mass of a single star.[178]) With these parameters, astronomers can estimate the age of the star.[179]

Luminosity

[edit]

The luminosity of a star is the amount of light and other forms of radiant energy it radiates per unit of time. It has units of power. The luminosity of a star is determined by its radius and surface temperature. Many stars do not radiate uniformly across their entire surface. The rapidly rotating star Vega, for example, has a higher energy flux (power per unit area) at its poles than along its equator.[180]

Patches of the star's surface with a lower temperature and luminosity than average are known as starspots. Small, dwarf stars such as the Sun generally have essentially featureless disks with only small starspots. Giant stars have much larger, more obvious starspots,[150] and they exhibit strong stellar limb darkening. That is, the brightness decreases towards the edge of the stellar disk.[181] Red dwarf flare stars such as UV Ceti may possess prominent starspot features.[182]

Magnitude

[edit]

The apparent brightness of a star is expressed in terms of its apparent magnitude. It is a function of the star's luminosity, its distance from Earth, the extinction effect of interstellar dust and gas, and the altering of the star's light as it passes through Earth's atmosphere. Intrinsic or absolute magnitude is directly related to a star's luminosity, and is the apparent magnitude a star would be if the distance between the Earth and the star were 10 parsecs (32.6 light-years).[183]

Number of stars brighter than magnitude
Apparent
magnitude
Number 
of stars[184]
0 4
1 15
2 48
3 171
4 513
5 1,602
6 4,800
7 14,000

Both the apparent and absolute magnitude scales are logarithmic units: one whole number difference in magnitude is equal to a brightness variation of about 2.5 times[185] (the 5th root of 100 or approximately 2.512). This means that a first magnitude star (+1.00) is about 2.5 times brighter than a second magnitude (+2.00) star, and about 100 times brighter than a sixth magnitude star (+6.00). The faintest stars visible to the naked eye under good seeing conditions are about magnitude +6.[186]

On both apparent and absolute magnitude scales, the smaller the magnitude number, the brighter the star; the larger the magnitude number, the fainter the star. The brightest stars, on either scale, have negative magnitude numbers. The variation in brightness (ΔL) between two stars is calculated by subtracting the magnitude number of the brighter star (mb) from the magnitude number of the fainter star (mf), then using the difference as an exponent for the base number 2.512; that is to say:

Relative to both luminosity and distance from Earth, a star's absolute magnitude (M) and apparent magnitude (m) are not equivalent;[185] for example, the bright star Sirius has an apparent magnitude of −1.44, but it has an absolute magnitude of +1.41.

The Sun has an apparent magnitude of −26.7, but its absolute magnitude is only +4.83. Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky as seen from Earth, is approximately 23 times more luminous than the Sun, while Canopus, the second brightest star in the night sky with an absolute magnitude of −5.53, is approximately 14,000 times more luminous than the Sun. Despite Canopus being vastly more luminous than Sirius, the latter star appears the brighter of the two. This is because Sirius is merely 8.6 light-years from the Earth, while Canopus is much farther away at a distance of 310 light-years.[187]

The most luminous known stars have absolute magnitudes of roughly −12, corresponding to 6 million times the luminosity of the Sun.[188] Theoretically, the least luminous stars are at the lower limit of mass at which stars are capable of supporting nuclear fusion of hydrogen in the core; stars just above this limit have been located in the NGC 6397 cluster. The faintest red dwarfs in the cluster are absolute magnitude 15, while a 17th absolute magnitude white dwarf has been discovered.[189][190]

Classification

[edit]
Surface temperature ranges for
different stellar classes[191]
Class Temperature Sample star
O 33,000 K or more Zeta Ophiuchi
B 10,500–30,000 K Rigel
A 7,500–10,000 K Altair
F 6,000–7,200 K Procyon A
G 5,500–6,000 K Sun
K 4,000–5,250 K Epsilon Indi
M 2,600–3,850 K Proxima Centauri

The current stellar classification system originated in the early 20th century, when stars were classified from A to Q based on the strength of the hydrogen line.[192] It was thought that the hydrogen line strength was a simple linear function of temperature. Instead, it was more complicated: it strengthened with increasing temperature, peaked near 9000 K, and then declined at greater temperatures. The classifications were since reordered by temperature, on which the modern scheme is based.[193]

Stars are given a single-letter classification according to their spectra, ranging from type O, which are very hot, to M, which are so cool that molecules may form in their atmospheres. The main classifications in order of decreasing surface temperature are: O, B, A, F, G, K, and M. A variety of rare spectral types are given special classifications. The most common of these are types L and T, which classify the coldest low-mass stars and brown dwarfs. Each letter has 10 sub-divisions, numbered from 0 to 9, in order of decreasing temperature. However, this system breaks down at extreme high temperatures as classes O0 and O1 may not exist.[194]

In addition, stars may be classified by the luminosity effects found in their spectral lines, which correspond to their spatial size and is determined by their surface gravity. These range from 0 (hypergiants) through III (giants) to V (main-sequence dwarfs); some authors add VII (white dwarfs). Main-sequence stars fall along a narrow, diagonal band when graphed according to their absolute magnitude and spectral type.[194] The Sun is a main-sequence G2V yellow dwarf of intermediate temperature and ordinary size.[195]

There is additional nomenclature in the form of lower-case letters added to the end of the spectral type to indicate peculiar features of the spectrum. For example, an "e" can indicate the presence of emission lines; "m" represents unusually strong levels of metals, and "var" can mean variations in the spectral type.[194]

White dwarf stars have their own class that begins with the letter D. This is further sub-divided into the classes DA, DB, DC, DO, DZ, and DQ, depending on the types of prominent lines found in the spectrum. This is followed by a numerical value that indicates the temperature.[196]

Variable stars

[edit]
Mira, an oscillating variable star on the asymptotic giant branch, is a red giant nearing the end of its life, noted for its asymmetrical appearance.

Variable stars have periodic or random changes in luminosity because of intrinsic or extrinsic properties. Of the intrinsically variable stars, the primary types can be subdivided into three principal groups.

During their stellar evolution, some stars pass through phases where they can become pulsating variables. Pulsating variable stars vary in radius and luminosity over time, expanding and contracting with periods ranging from minutes to years, depending on the size of the star. This category includes Cepheid and Cepheid-like stars, and long-period variables such as Mira.[197]

Eruptive variables are stars that experience sudden increases in luminosity because of flares or mass ejection events.[197] This group includes protostars, Wolf-Rayet stars, and flare stars, as well as giant and supergiant stars.

Cataclysmic or explosive variable stars are those that undergo a dramatic change in their properties. This group includes novae and supernovae. A binary star system that includes a nearby white dwarf can produce certain types of these spectacular stellar explosions, including the nova and a Type Ia supernova.[89] The explosion is created when the white dwarf accretes hydrogen from the companion star, building up mass until the hydrogen undergoes fusion.[198] Some novae are recurrent, having periodic outbursts of moderate amplitude.[197]

Stars can vary in luminosity because of extrinsic factors, such as eclipsing binaries, as well as rotating stars that produce extreme starspots.[197] A notable example of an eclipsing binary is Algol, which regularly varies in magnitude from 2.1 to 3.4 over a period of 2.87 days.[199]

Structure

[edit]
Internal structures of main-sequence stars with masses indicated in solar masses, convection zones with arrowed cycles, and radiative zones with red flashes. Left to right, a red dwarf, a yellow dwarf, and a blue-white main-sequence star

The interior of a stable star is in a state of hydrostatic equilibrium: the forces on any small volume almost exactly counterbalance each other. The balanced forces are inward gravitational force and an outward force due to the pressure gradient within the star. The pressure gradient is established by the temperature gradient of the plasma; the outer part of the star is cooler than the core. The temperature at the core of a main-sequence or giant star is at least on the order of 107 K. The resulting temperature and pressure at the hydrogen-burning core of a main-sequence star are sufficient for nuclear fusion to occur and for sufficient energy to be produced to prevent further collapse of the star.[200][201]

As atomic nuclei are fused in the core, they emit energy in the form of gamma rays. These photons interact with the surrounding plasma, adding to the thermal energy at the core. Stars on the main sequence convert hydrogen into helium, creating a slowly but steadily increasing proportion of helium in the core. Eventually the helium content becomes predominant, and energy production ceases at the core. Instead, for stars of more than 0.4 M, fusion occurs in a slowly expanding shell around the degenerate helium core.[202]

In addition to hydrostatic equilibrium, the interior of a stable star will maintain an energy balance of thermal equilibrium. There is a radial temperature gradient throughout the interior that results in a flux of energy flowing toward the exterior. The outgoing flux of energy leaving any layer within the star will exactly match the incoming flux from below.[203]

The radiation zone is the region of the stellar interior where the flux of energy outward is dependent on radiative heat transfer, since convective heat transfer is inefficient in that zone. In this region the plasma will not be perturbed, and any mass motions will die out. Where this is not the case, then the plasma becomes unstable and convection will occur, forming a convection zone. This can occur, for example, in regions where very high energy fluxes occur, such as near the core or in areas with high opacity (making radiatative heat transfer inefficient) as in the outer envelope.[201]

The occurrence of convection in the outer envelope of a main-sequence star depends on the star's mass. Stars with several times the mass of the Sun have a convection zone deep within the interior and a radiative zone in the outer layers. Smaller stars such as the Sun are just the opposite, with the convective zone located in the outer layers.[204] Red dwarf stars with less than 0.4 M are convective throughout, which prevents the accumulation of a helium core.[86] For most stars the convective zones will vary over time as the star ages and the constitution of the interior is modified.[201]

A cross-section of the Sun

The photosphere is that portion of a star that is visible to an observer. This is the layer at which the plasma of the star becomes transparent to photons of light. From here, the energy generated at the core becomes free to propagate into space. It is within the photosphere that sun spots, regions of lower than average temperature, appear.[205]

Above the level of the photosphere is the stellar atmosphere. In a main-sequence star such as the Sun, the lowest level of the atmosphere, just above the photosphere, is the thin chromosphere region, where spicules appear and stellar flares begin. Above this is the transition region, where the temperature rapidly increases within a distance of only 100 km (62 mi). Beyond this is the corona, a volume of super-heated plasma that can extend outward to several million kilometres.[206] The existence of a corona appears to be dependent on a convective zone in the outer layers of the star.[204] Despite its high temperature, the corona emits very little light, due to its low gas density.[207] The corona region of the Sun is normally only visible during a solar eclipse.

From the corona, a stellar wind of plasma particles expands outward from the star, until it interacts with the interstellar medium. For the Sun, the influence of its solar wind extends throughout a bubble-shaped region called the heliosphere.[208]

Nuclear fusion reaction pathways

[edit]
Overview of the proton–proton chain
The carbon-nitrogen-oxygen cycle

When nuclei fuse, the mass of the fused product is less than the mass of the original parts. This lost mass is converted to electromagnetic energy, according to the mass–energy equivalence relationship .[209] A variety of nuclear fusion reactions take place in the cores of stars, that depend upon their mass and composition.

The hydrogen fusion process is temperature-sensitive, so a moderate increase in the core temperature will result in a significant increase in the fusion rate. As a result, the core temperature of main-sequence stars only varies from 4 million kelvin for a small M-class star to 40 million kelvin for a massive O-class star.[172]

In the Sun, with a 16-million-kelvin core, hydrogen fuses to form helium in the proton–proton chain reaction:[210]

41H → 22H + 2e+ + 2νe(2 x 0.4 MeV)
2e+ + 2e → 2γ (2 x 1.0 MeV)
21H + 22H → 23He + 2γ (2 x 5.5 MeV)
23He → 4He + 21H (12.9 MeV)

There are a couple other paths, in which 3He and 4He combine to form 7Be, which eventually (with the addition of another proton) yields two 4He, a gain of one.

All these reactions result in the overall reaction:

41H → 4He + 2γ + 2νe (26.7 MeV)

where γ is a gamma ray photon, νe is a neutrino, and H and He are isotopes of hydrogen and helium, respectively. The energy released by this reaction is in millions of electron volts. Each individual reaction produces only a tiny amount of energy, but because enormous numbers of these reactions occur constantly, they produce all the energy necessary to sustain the star's radiation output. In comparison, the combustion of two hydrogen gas molecules with one oxygen gas molecule releases only 5.7 eV.

In more massive stars, helium is produced in a cycle of reactions catalyzed by carbon called the carbon-nitrogen-oxygen cycle.[210]

In evolved stars with cores at 100 million kelvin and masses between 0.5 and 10 M, helium can be transformed into carbon in the triple-alpha process that uses the intermediate element beryllium:[210]

4He + 4He + 92 keV → 8*Be
4He + 8*Be + 67 keV → 12*C
12*C → 12C + γ + 7.4 MeV

For an overall reaction of:

Overview of consecutive fusion processes in massive stars
34He → 12C + γ + 7.2 MeV

In massive stars, heavier elements can be burned in a contracting core through the neon-burning process and oxygen-burning process. The final stage in the stellar nucleosynthesis process is the silicon-burning process that results in the production of the stable isotope iron-56.[210] Any further fusion would be an endothermic process that consumes energy, and so further energy can only be produced through gravitational collapse.

Duration of the main phases of fusion for a 20 M star[211]
Fuel
material
Temperature
(million kelvins)
Density
(kg/cm3)
Burn duration
(τ in years)
H 37 0.0045 8.1 million
He 188 0.97 1.2 million
C 870 170 976
Ne 1,570 3,100 0.6
O 1,980 5,550 1.25
S/Si 3,340 33,400 0.0315 (~11.5 days)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A star is a luminous spheroid of plasma held together by its own gravity and powered by nuclear fusion in its core, primarily converting hydrogen into helium to release energy as light and heat.[1][2] Stars are the fundamental building blocks of galaxies. The Milky Way contains more than 100 billion stars, while the observable universe is estimated to hold up to 1 septillion (10^{24}) stars.[1] Stars form in giant molecular clouds spanning hundreds of light-years with masses from 1,000 to 10 million times that of the Sun. Gravitational instabilities cause dense regions to collapse into protostars. As protostars contract, their cores reach approximately 15 million kelvin, igniting hydrogen fusion and beginning the main sequence phase—the longest stage in a star's life, lasting millions to billions of years depending on mass. For example, the Sun, a G-type main-sequence star, is roughly halfway through its 10-billion-year main sequence lifetime.[2] A star's evolution is governed primarily by its initial mass. Low- to intermediate-mass stars (up to about 8 solar masses) exhaust core hydrogen, expand into red giants, shed outer layers as planetary nebulae, and leave white dwarfs that cool gradually over billions of years. Massive stars (greater than about 8 solar masses) evolve into red supergiants, fuse progressively heavier elements up to iron, and conclude in core-collapse supernovae. These explosions leave neutron stars (remnant masses typically 1.4–3 solar masses) or black holes (for progenitors exceeding about 20–25 solar masses).[1][2][3] These processes enrich the interstellar medium with heavy elements, enabling new star formation, planet development, and the conditions for life.[1] Stars vary widely in properties and are classified by spectral type (O, B, A, F, G, K, M), reflecting surface temperatures from over 30,000 K (O-type) to about 3,000 K (M-type), and by luminosity classes ranging from dwarfs to supergiants. Many exist in binary or multiple systems, and observations of stellar clusters, such as in the Eagle Nebula, reveal active formation environments.[1]

Introduction

Etymology

The English word "star" derives from Old English steorra, from Proto-Germanic sternǭ, ultimately from the Proto-Indo-European root h₂stḗr ("star").[4][5] Cognates in other Indo-European languages include Latin stella, Ancient Greek astḗr, and Sanskrit tárā.[6]

Historical observations

Human observations of stars date back to ancient civilizations, where they served practical purposes such as navigation, agriculture, and timekeeping. The Babylonians maintained systematic records of celestial positions from around the 2nd millennium BCE, developing early star catalogs like the MUL.APIN compendium (ca. 1000 BCE) and mathematical models to predict planetary and stellar motions.[7] Similarly, ancient Egyptians incorporated stars into their religious and calendrical systems, observing constellations like Orion and Sirius to align pyramids and track the Nile's floods, though their records were less mathematical than the Babylonians'.[8] In ancient Greece, Hipparchus of Nicaea compiled the first comprehensive star catalog around 129 BCE, listing about 850 stars with their positions and brightnesses using equatorial coordinates, motivated by an observed nova that prompted him to detect proper motions.[9] Ptolemy of Alexandria synthesized earlier Greek and Babylonian knowledge in his Almagest (circa 150 CE), which included a star catalog of 1,022 entries derived largely from Hipparchus' work, providing longitudes, latitudes, and magnitudes for stars visible from the Mediterranean.[10] This geocentric model influenced astronomy profoundly, though during the medieval Islamic Golden Age (8th–15th centuries), scholars preserved and advanced it through translations and new observations. For instance, Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi compiled the Book of Fixed Stars in 964 CE, updating Ptolemy's catalog with over 1,000 stars, improved positions, and descriptions of southern constellations; later, Ulugh Beg's 15th-century catalog at Samarkand listed 1,018 stars with high precision, aiding global astronomical progress.[11][12] In the Renaissance, Tycho Brahe advanced precision without telescopes; from his observatory on Hven in the late 16th century, he measured star positions to within 1 arcminute using large quadrants and sextants, compiling a catalog of over 1,000 stars that revealed no detectable parallax, supporting vast stellar distances.[13] The invention of the telescope revolutionized stellar observation. In 1610, Galileo Galilei published Sidereus Nuncius, describing how his refractor resolved the Milky Way into myriad individual stars and revealed previously unseen stellar details in clusters like the Pleiades, challenging the Aristotelian view of an unchanging celestial realm.[14] In the 1780s, William Herschel conducted extensive sweeps of the northern sky with his large reflectors, counting stars in various directions to map the Milky Way's structure, concluding it formed a flattened disk with the Sun near its center and identifying thousands of new double stars and nebulae.[15] The late 19th century saw the dawn of stellar spectroscopy at Harvard College Observatory, where Edward Pickering initiated photographic surveys of stellar spectra in the 1880s. Williamina Fleming and Annie Jump Cannon refined this into the Harvard Classification Scheme by the 1890s, categorizing stars into spectral types (O, B, A, F, G, K, M) based on absorption lines, enabling the first systematic understanding of stellar temperatures and compositions.[16] In the 20th century, direct distance measurements became feasible. Friedrich Bessel measured the first stellar parallax in 1838 for 61 Cygni, yielding a distance of about 10 light-years and confirming stars' immense remoteness, though systematic parallax programs expanded dramatically with 20th-century instruments.[17] Edwin Hubble's observations in the 1920s at Mount Wilson Observatory, using the 100-inch Hooker telescope, identified Cepheid variables in Andromeda (M31), proving it an independent galaxy beyond the Milky Way and establishing the cosmic distance scale, with his 1929 velocity-distance relation indicating universal expansion.[18]

Nomenclature and measurement

Designations

Stars are identified using systematic designations that support cataloging and reference in astronomical research. These conventions evolved from early efforts to standardize nomenclature, providing unique identifiers based on position, brightness, or variability. They include constellation-based labels and numerical catalogs. The Bayer designation, introduced by Johann Bayer in his 1603 star atlas Uranometria, assigns Greek letters—starting with alpha for the brightest star—followed by the Latin genitive of the constellation name. For example, Alpha Centauri is the brightest star in Centaurus. This brightness-prioritized system remains foundational for naming visible stars and extends to lowercase Greek letters and Roman numerals when Greek letters are exhausted.[19] The Flamsteed designation, published by John Flamsteed in 1725 in Historia Coelestis Britannica, assigns Arabic numerals to stars within each constellation, ordered by increasing right ascension rather than brightness. An example is 61 Cygni. It cataloged nearly 3,000 stars with positional accuracy of 10–20 arcseconds, proving especially useful for fainter stars lacking Bayer designations.[20] Modern catalogs provide numerical identifiers for broader coverage. The Henry Draper Catalogue (HD), published in sections from 1918 to 1924, includes spectral types for 225,300 stars brighter than magnitude 9, ordered by right ascension.[21] The Bright Star Catalogue (HR), in its fifth edition (1991), lists 9,110 stars brighter than visual magnitude 6.5, with data on positions, proper motions, and photometry. For example, HR 1713 designates Rigel.[22] The Hipparcos Catalogue, from the ESA's Hipparcos mission (1989–1993), supplies high-precision positions, parallaxes, and proper motions for 118,218 stars down to magnitude 12. The companion Tycho-2 Catalogue (2000) extends to 2,539,913 stars (99% brighter than magnitude 11) with slightly lower precision.[23] The ESA's Gaia mission, launched in 2013, produced Data Release 3 (2022) with astrometric data for 1,812,194,486 sources at microarcsecond precision, enabling accurate distances across the Milky Way.[24] Variable stars follow IAU conventions in the General Catalogue of Variable Stars (GCVS). Where possible, they retain Bayer or Flamsteed designations; otherwise, they receive letters R to Z, then RR to ZZ (skipping J), and finally V followed by a number, suffixed by the three-letter constellation abbreviation (e.g., RR Lyrae).[25] Host stars of exoplanets retain their existing catalog designations, with planets appended as lowercase letters (b, c, etc.) in order of discovery, starting from the innermost. The IAU occasionally approves proper names through public contests, but scientific usage prioritizes catalog identifiers for consistency.[26]

Units of measurement

In astronomy, stellar distances are measured in light-years or parsecs. A light-year is the distance light travels in vacuum over one Julian year (365.25 days), approximately 9.46 × 10^{12} kilometers.[27] A parsec (pc) is the distance at which one astronomical unit subtends an angle of one arcsecond, equivalent to about 3.26 light-years or 3.086 × 10^{16} meters.[28][29] Distances in parsecs are determined from parallax measurements, where distance dd in parsecs equals the reciprocal of the parallax angle π\pi in arcseconds: d=1/πd = 1 / \pi. A parallax of 1 arcsecond thus corresponds to 1 parsec.[29] Stellar masses, luminosities, radii, and effective temperatures are typically expressed relative to solar values for convenient comparison. Mass is given in solar masses (M1.989×1030M_\odot \approx 1.989 \times 10^{30} kg).[30] Luminosity is expressed in solar luminosities (L3.828×1026L_\odot \approx 3.828 \times 10^{26} W),[31] radius in solar radii (R=6.957×108R_\odot = 6.957 \times 10^8 m),[31] and effective temperature (the blackbody temperature matching the star's total energy output) in kelvin, with the Sun at 5772 K.[31] These relative scales emphasize comparisons across stellar populations rather than absolute values.

Formation and evolution

Star formation

Stars form through the gravitational collapse of dense regions within giant molecular clouds (GMCs), cold (typically 10–20 K), massive structures of molecular hydrogen and dust with masses from 10410^4 to 10610^6 solar masses. These clouds act as stellar nurseries, where turbulence and self-gravity produce overdensities that collapse when the region's mass exceeds the Jeans mass—the critical scale at which gravity overcomes thermal pressure support. The Jeans mass is approximated by
MJ(5kTGμmH)3/2(34πρ)1/2, M_J \approx \left( \frac{5 k T}{G \mu m_H} \right)^{3/2} \left( \frac{3}{4\pi \rho} \right)^{1/2},
where kk is Boltzmann's constant, TT is temperature, GG is the gravitational constant, μ\mu is the mean molecular weight, mHm_H is the hydrogen atom mass, and ρ\rho is density. Cooler, denser regions thus favor fragmentation into protostellar cores. Early collapse often produces Bok globules—compact, isolated dark clouds (typically 0.1–1 pc across and 10–100 solar masses)—that appear as silhouettes against brighter nebulae and serve as precursors to low-mass stars. As collapse accelerates, a central protostar emerges, surrounded by a rotating envelope that flattens into a protostellar disk due to angular momentum conservation. Material accretes onto the protostar through an accretion shock, building its mass over 10510^5 to 10610^6 years until the envelope is largely depleted. During this embedded phase, protostars remain obscured by dust and are primarily observable in infrared, with outflows and jets expelling excess angular momentum to sustain accretion.[32] Newly formed stars follow the initial mass function (IMF), which describes the distribution of stellar masses at birth. The Salpeter IMF, derived from field star observations, follows a power-law form dNdMM2.35\frac{dN}{dM} \propto M^{-2.35} for masses between about 0.4 and 10 solar masses, indicating a preference for lower-mass stars.[33] Environmental factors modulate this process: supernova shock waves can compress molecular clouds, raising densities above the Jeans threshold and triggering collapse in otherwise stable regions.[34] Magnetic fields provide additional support against gravity, shaping cloud contraction into hourglass structures that promote clustered star formation while limiting excessive fragmentation.[35] As of 2025, observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have revealed intricate details of star-forming regions within giant molecular clouds, such as the W43 complex, refining models of fragmentation and accretion.[36]

Main sequence phase

The main sequence phase is the longest and most stable period in a star's life cycle. It begins when the protostar reaches the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS), where hydrogen fusion in the core fully sustains the star's luminosity. This phase typically accounts for about 90% of a star's lifetime, during which the star maintains nearly constant luminosity, surface temperature, and radius while fusing hydrogen into helium in its core. For example, the Sun, a G-type main-sequence star, is expected to remain in this phase for about 10 billion years, of which roughly half has elapsed.[37][38][39] Energy comes from nuclear fusion in the core, primarily the proton-proton chain in low-mass stars like the Sun and the CNO cycle in higher-mass stars with sufficient core temperatures. These reactions produce the thermal pressure that balances gravitational collapse, establishing equilibrium. A key feature is the mass-luminosity relation, approximated as $ L \propto M^{3.5} $ for stars below about 20 $ M_\odot $, so more massive stars are far more luminous and consume their hydrogen fuel more rapidly.[40][41] This stability relies on hydrostatic equilibrium, where outward radiation pressure from fusion counters gravity at every layer, and on efficient energy transport—radiative diffusion in the core and radiative or convective processes in the outer layers—that carries heat to the surface. Consequently, main-sequence stars form a well-defined band on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, spanning cool red dwarfs to hot blue giants, with positions determined mainly by initial mass.[42]

Post-main sequence evolution

After the exhaustion of hydrogen in the stellar core, which marks the end of the main sequence phase lasting approximately 10 billion years for a star like the Sun, the star undergoes significant structural changes leading to its post-main-sequence evolution.[43] The inert helium core contracts under gravity, increasing its temperature and density, while hydrogen fusion shifts to a thin shell surrounding the core.[44] This shell burning releases energy that heats and expands the overlying envelope, causing the star to swell dramatically in radius—up to hundreds of times its main-sequence size—and cool at the surface, shifting its spectral type toward redder classes.[44] This phase is known as the red giant branch (RGB), during which the star ascends the rightward track on the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram, with luminosity increasing by factors of 10³ to 10⁴ compared to its main-sequence value due to the more efficient shell burning and reduced opacity in the expanded envelope.[44] For low- to intermediate-mass stars (roughly 0.8 to 8 solar masses), the core contraction continues until temperatures reach about 100 million Kelvin, triggering a helium flash—a brief, explosive ignition of helium fusion in the degenerate core.[43] The Sun, for instance, is expected to enter the RGB phase in approximately 5 billion years, expanding to engulf Mercury and Venus while its luminosity rises to around 2,000 times its current value.[45] Following the helium flash, low-mass stars (below about 2 solar masses) stabilize into the horizontal branch (HB) phase, where core helium burning proceeds steadily alongside hydrogen shell burning, maintaining a roughly constant luminosity while the star contracts and heats up.[46] On the HR diagram, HB stars trace a nearly horizontal path to the left of the RGB, appearing bluer and hotter, with this phase lasting tens of millions of years before helium depletion in the core.[43] The HB morphology varies with stellar mass and metallicity, influencing the distribution of RR Lyrae variables among these core-helium-burning objects.[46] Once core helium is exhausted, the star evolves onto the asymptotic giant branch (AGB), characterized by alternating shell burning of hydrogen and helium around an inert carbon-oxygen core, leading to further envelope expansion into a red supergiant-like state. Helium shell ignition occurs in periodic thermal pulses every 10,000 to 100,000 years, causing luminosity surges and driving strong mass loss through pulsation-enhanced dust-driven winds, which can eject up to 50% of the star's envelope over the AGB lifetime of about 1 million years. On the HR diagram, AGB tracks parallel the RGB but at higher luminosities (up to 10⁴–10⁵ solar luminosities), converging asymptotically toward the Hayashi limit for the star's mass.[43]

End stages of stellar life

The end stages of a star's life depend primarily on its initial mass, which determines whether it ends quietly with the ejection of outer layers or violently in a supernova explosion, leaving behind compact remnants such as white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes.[47] Low-mass stars (initial masses below approximately 8 M☉) form a planetary nebula and white dwarf, while higher-mass stars undergo core-collapse supernovae that produce neutron stars or black holes.[48] These terminal phases release enormous energy and enrich the interstellar medium with heavy elements, driving galactic chemical evolution.[49] Stars with initial masses less than about 8 M☉ exhaust their nuclear fuel after ascending the red giant branch, where core helium fusion ceases and the outer envelope becomes unstable. The star ejects its outer layers as a planetary nebula—a glowing shell of ionized gas—exposing the hot core, which collapses but is stabilized by electron degeneracy pressure.[50] The resulting white dwarf consists mainly of carbon and oxygen, with masses of 0.2–1.4 M☉ and radii similar to Earth's.[50] The Chandrasekhar limit of approximately 1.4 M☉ marks the maximum stable mass; exceeding it (e.g., via accretion in a binary system) can trigger further collapse.[51] Over timescales far exceeding the current age of the universe (~13.8 billion years), white dwarfs gradually cool and fade, eventually becoming cold, dark black dwarfs with negligible luminosity.[50] Stars with initial masses of 8–20 M☉ develop an iron core in late fusion stages. Since iron fusion consumes rather than releases energy, core support fails, triggering rapid collapse and a rebounding Type II supernova that expels most of the star's mass at up to 10% of the speed of light.[52] The remnant is a neutron star, formed as protons and electrons combine into neutrons under extreme density and supported by neutron degeneracy pressure, with typical masses of 1.1–2 M☉ and radii of 10–20 km.[53][54] Stars exceeding 20 M☉ undergo similar core-collapse supernovae but with greater energy release; fallback accretion often results in black hole formation.[55] Extremely massive stars (initial masses ~130–250 M☉) can experience pair-instability supernovae: electron-positron pair production in the oxygen-burning core reduces radiation pressure, causing instability and total disruption with explosive oxygen ignition and no remnant.[56] In incomplete explosions, the core collapses beyond neutron degeneracy to form a black hole, typically with masses exceeding 3 M☉. These rare events help explain upper limits on stellar remnants and early-universe supermassive black holes.[57]

Stellar systems and distribution

Binary and multiple star systems

A significant fraction of stars in the Milky Way exist in gravitationally bound multiple systems, with at least 50% of solar-like stars having companions, rising to nearly 100% for massive stars.[58] Binary systems, consisting of two stars orbiting their common center of mass, are the most common configuration, while higher-order multiples like triples and quadruples occur less frequently but are crucial for understanding dynamical interactions.[59] Binary stars are classified observationally based on detection methods. Visual binaries are those where both components can be spatially resolved and their orbits tracked directly, such as Alpha Centauri A and B.[60] Spectroscopic binaries reveal their nature through periodic radial velocity variations in their spectra, indicating unseen orbital motion, and are subdivided into single-lined (one spectrum shows variation) and double-lined (both components visible).[59] Eclipsing binaries, a subset of spectroscopic systems, produce photometric light curves with periodic dips when one star occults the other, enabling precise measurements of radii and inclinations, as seen in Algol.[59] The dynamics of binary systems follow Kepler's laws adapted for two bodies. The third law relates the orbital period $ P $ to the semi-major axis $ a $ of the relative orbit via $ P^2 = \frac{4\pi^2}{G(M_1 + M_2)} a^3 $, where $ M_1 $ and $ M_2 $ are the stellar masses, allowing mass determination from observed periods and separations.[60] Close binaries, with separations small enough for tidal interactions, can experience Roche lobe overflow when the donor star expands to fill its Roche lobe—the gravitational equipotential surface defining the star's effective boundary—leading to mass transfer onto the companion. This overflow initiates stable or unstable mass exchange, altering the system's orbital parameters and stellar evolution.[59] In binary evolution, mass transfer profoundly influences stellar lifecycles, often differing from isolated stars. During the donor's expansion (e.g., post-main-sequence), accreted material can spin up the recipient, forming rapidly rotating stars, or trigger common envelope phases where the donor's envelope engulfs both cores, leading to orbital shrinkage via drag and potential ejection of the envelope.[59] In white dwarf binaries, steady accretion can drive the primary toward the Chandrasekhar limit (~1.4 solar masses), resulting in Type Ia supernovae when thermonuclear runaway ignites carbon-oxygen fusion. These events, arising from single-degenerate channels, provide standard candles for cosmology but require specific accretion rates to avoid nova outbursts. Multiple star systems, such as triples, typically adopt hierarchical architectures for long-term stability, with an inner binary orbited by a distant tertiary. Stability criteria, like the Mardling-Aarseth parameter, assess disruption risk based on mass ratios, eccentricities, and separations; systems with outer-to-inner period ratios exceeding ~10-20 are generally stable against chaotic ejections. Hierarchical triples facilitate complex dynamics, including Kozai-Lidov oscillations that couple eccentricities and inclinations, potentially driving close encounters or mergers, as observed in systems like HD 181068.[59]

Distribution in galaxies

Stars in the Milky Way Galaxy are distributed across distinct structural components, each characterized by specific stellar populations reflecting different epochs of formation. The galactic disk, which dominates the visible structure, hosts a thin disk layer rich in young, metal-rich Population I stars, primarily formed in the spiral arms from recent star formation events. In contrast, the thicker disk component contains older stars with intermediate metallicities. The central bulge comprises predominantly old, metal-poor to metal-rich stars from an earlier generation, indicative of rapid formation in the galaxy's formative phase. The stellar halo, extending outward and encompassing ancient Population II stars with low metallicities ([Fe/H] < -1), represents the oldest component, likely built from accreted dwarf galaxies and early in-situ formation.[61][62][63] The distribution of stars is influenced by the galaxy's differential rotation, where inner regions orbit faster than outer ones, as described by the galactic rotation curve. This curve, derived from observations of stellar and gas kinematics, shows a nearly flat profile beyond a few kiloparsecs, implying a significant dark matter contribution to maintain orbital speeds. Local stellar motions are parameterized by the Oort constants, with A ≈ 14.7 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹ measuring shear and B ≈ -13 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹ indicating vorticity, based on recent Gaia data analyses. These constants quantify how stellar velocities vary with position in the disk, shaping the overall spatial arrangement.[64] Stars constitute only a small fraction of the Milky Way's total mass, approximately 1-2%, with the remainder dominated by dark matter and interstellar gas; the stellar mass is estimated at around 2.6 × 10¹⁰ solar masses within a total galactic mass of about 1.5 × 10¹² solar masses. Within the disk, stars are not uniformly distributed but clustered in loose stellar associations and more tightly bound open clusters, particularly in the spiral arms where star formation is concentrated. These clusters, numbering over 3,000 identified in surveys, serve as nurseries for young stars and tracers of galactic structure.[65][66] In extragalactic contexts, the distribution and density of stars in other galaxies are inferred from star formation rates (SFRs), often measured via ultraviolet (UV) observations that capture emission from young, massive stars. Surveys like those from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) reveal SFRs ranging from 0.1 to 100 solar masses per year in typical spirals, with higher rates in starbursts; for instance, UV luminosities correlate strongly with Hα emissions, enabling integrated estimates of stellar populations across diverse galaxy types. This approach highlights how stellar distributions vary with galaxy morphology, with disk-dominated systems showing concentrated star formation similar to the Milky Way.[67][68]

Physical properties

Mass

Stellar mass, typically expressed in units of solar masses (M☉), is the total amount of matter in a star and serves as the fundamental parameter governing its structure, energy output, and evolutionary path. The lowest mass for a true star, capable of sustained hydrogen fusion in its core, is approximately 0.08 M☉; objects below this threshold are classified as brown dwarfs, which fail to ignite stable fusion. At the upper end, stellar masses rarely exceed about 150 M☉, as higher masses lead to instability from radiation pressure overpowering gravitational binding, causing excessive mass loss during formation.[69][70] Direct measurement of stellar masses is challenging and primarily relies on observations of binary star systems, where gravitational interactions reveal masses through orbital dynamics. In spectroscopic binaries, radial velocity variations from Doppler shifts provide the mass function, yielding the minimum mass (m sin i) for each component, though the inclination angle introduces uncertainty.[71] Eclipsing binaries offer more precise absolute masses by combining light curve analysis for radii and inclinations with spectroscopic data for velocities, enabling application of Kepler's laws to compute total mass sums and individual values.[72] For single stars, masses are often inferred indirectly from evolutionary models calibrated against observed binaries.[71] A star's mass profoundly influences its lifespan and energy production: more massive stars consume their nuclear fuel at a faster rate, resulting in shorter main-sequence lifetimes scaling roughly as τ ∝ M^{-2.5}, while also generating higher overall luminosities that accelerate evolution.[73] For instance, a star of 20 M☉ has a main-sequence lifetime of only about 10 million years, compared to the Sun's 10 billion years at 1 M☉.[73] The initial mass function (IMF) describes the distribution of stellar masses at birth within a population, originally formulated by Salpeter as a power-law (dN/dM ∝ M^{-α} with α ≈ 2.35 for masses above 0.5 M☉). Modern formulations, such as Kroupa's piecewise model, extend this to lower masses and reveal variations in the IMF across environments; for example, denser regions like galactic centers or young clusters show a flatter low-mass slope (more low-mass stars) or enhanced high-mass end compared to the Milky Way disk.[74] These environmental dependencies arise from differences in star formation physics, such as cloud density and turbulence, as evidenced in observations of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies.[75]

Radius

Stellar radii range from about 0.01 RR_\odot for white dwarfs to over 1000 RR_\odot for red supergiants.[76][77] This broad range reflects structural adjustments to maintain hydrostatic equilibrium across diverse masses and evolutionary stages. Radii are determined by direct and indirect methods. Direct measurements use angular diameter θ\theta and distance dd in the relation R=θd/2R = \theta d / 2, with distances typically from parallax data such as those from Gaia. Direct techniques include long-baseline optical and infrared interferometry with arrays like CHARA, lunar occultations that record diffraction patterns, and intensity interferometry that correlates light fluctuations. These methods have resolved diameters for hundreds of stars.[78] For example, interferometric observations of Betelgeuse yield angular diameters of 42–59 mas, corresponding to physical radii of roughly 764–1400 RR_\odot depending on adopted distance and wavelength, though higher values may include circumstellar material and overestimate photospheric size.[79][80] Indirect methods rely on spectroscopic modeling to fit line profiles, equivalent widths, and continuum shapes to atmospheric models, deriving effective temperature TeffT_\mathrm{eff} and surface gravity logg\log g. Radius then follows from R=L/(4πσTeff4)R = \sqrt{L / (4\pi \sigma T_\mathrm{eff}^4)} using bolometric luminosity LL.[81] This approach is essential for distant or faint stars beyond direct resolution. On the main sequence, radius scales empirically with mass as RM0.8R \propto M^{0.8}, arising from higher-mass stars having hotter, more opaque interiors that require larger envelopes for stability.[42] In post-main-sequence phases, radii expand dramatically in giants and supergiants. After core hydrogen exhaustion, an inert helium core contracts and ignites a surrounding hydrogen-burning shell, which deposits excess energy and causes convective envelope expansion by factors of 100 or more.[82] Radius remains closely tied to mass through the mass-radius relation. Angular diameter measurements are limited by baseline BB and wavelength λ\lambda, with theoretical resolution θλ/B\theta \approx \lambda / B. Optical interferometers achieve ~0.5–1 mas for nearby stars, while practical limits from atmospheric turbulence and setup are around 1 mas for ground-based visible-light arrays.[78][83]

Temperature

The surface temperature of a star, often expressed as its effective temperature $ T_{\text{eff}} $, represents the temperature of a blackbody that would emit the same total amount of energy as the star.[84] Stellar effective temperatures span a wide range, from approximately 2,000 K for cool giants to over 50,000 K for the hottest O-type stars.[85][86] Astronomers determine a star's effective temperature using the blackbody approximation derived from its luminosity $ L $, radius $ R $, and the Stefan-Boltzmann constant $ \sigma $, via the formula
Teff=(L4πR2σ)1/4, T_{\text{eff}} = \left( \frac{L}{4 \pi R^2 \sigma} \right)^{1/4},
where the surface area is approximated as that of a sphere.[84] This method provides an average temperature across the stellar photosphere, accounting for the star's total radiated energy flux.[87] One common observational proxy for temperature is the B-V color index, which measures the difference in brightness between blue (B) and visual (V) filters and correlates with stellar color. Hot stars exhibit negative or near-zero B-V values due to their blue appearance, while cool stars have positive values up to around +2.0, appearing redder.[88] For instance, the Sun has a B-V index of +0.65, corresponding to an effective temperature of about 5,800 K.[89] Empirical relations, such as those fitted from modern photometric data, allow direct conversion between B-V and $ T_{\text{eff}} $, enabling temperature estimates from broadband observations.[89] Stellar temperature profoundly influences the ionization states of elements in the atmosphere, which in turn dictate the prominence of specific spectral lines. At temperatures above 10,000 K, high ionization levels favor lines from highly ionized species like He II, whereas cooler regimes below 6,000 K promote neutral or singly ionized atoms, such as those of calcium and iron, producing distinct absorption features.[90] These temperature-dependent ionization zones provide key diagnostics for analyzing stellar atmospheres through spectroscopy.[91]

Chemical composition

Stars form primarily from primordial material produced by Big Bang nucleosynthesis, consisting of approximately 75% hydrogen and 25% helium by mass, with trace amounts of deuterium, helium-3, and lithium.[92] These light elements constitute the baseline composition for all stars, as heavier elements, collectively termed "metals" in astrophysics, were negligible in the early universe. Subsequent generations of stars enrich the interstellar medium with metals through nucleosynthetic processes, leading to the observed compositions in present-day stars. The total metallicity, denoted as $ Z $, represents the mass fraction of all elements heavier than helium and typically ranges from about 0.008 to 0.02 in disk stars, with the Sun having $ Z_\odot \approx 0.0134 $.[93] Metallicity is often quantified using the iron-to-hydrogen ratio on a logarithmic scale, defined as $ [\mathrm{Fe/H}] = \log_{10} (N_\mathrm{Fe}/N_\mathrm{H}) - \log_{10} (N_{\mathrm{Fe},\odot}/N_{\mathrm{H},\odot}) $, where $ N $ denotes number abundances and the subscript $ \odot $ refers to solar values; solar metallicity corresponds to $ [\mathrm{Fe/H}] = 0 $.[93] This scale serves as a proxy for overall metal content, as iron is a common product of stellar nucleosynthesis and easily measured spectroscopically. The chemical abundances in stars are determined through high-resolution spectroscopy, which analyzes absorption lines in the stellar spectrum formed by atomic transitions in the photosphere. For the Sun, the Fraunhofer lines—dark absorption features first cataloged in the visible spectrum—provide detailed abundance measurements for dozens of elements, yielding the standard solar composition used as a reference for other stars.[93] Techniques such as equivalent width measurements and spectral synthesis compare observed line strengths to model atmospheres, accounting for temperature, gravity, and microturbulence to derive precise abundances.[94] Stellar populations exhibit significant variations in metallicity, reflecting their formation epochs and locations within galaxies. Population I stars, typically young and residing in the galactic disk, have high metallicities with $ [\mathrm{Fe/H}] $ ranging from -0.5 to +0.5, enriched by multiple generations of prior stellar evolution. In contrast, Population II stars, ancient and found in the galactic halo or bulge, display low metallicities with $ [\mathrm{Fe/H}] < -1 $, often as low as -3 or below, due to formation from relatively pristine gas with minimal prior enrichment.[95] These differences highlight the progressive buildup of metals over cosmic time, with an observed age-metallicity relation where older stars generally possess lower abundances.[96]

Age

Stars range in age from about 1 million years in young open clusters to roughly 13 billion years in globular clusters. These extremes serve as benchmarks for stellar populations, with young stars found in active star-forming regions and ancient ones preserving records of early galactic history.[97] Individual stellar ages are typically estimated by placing stars on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram and fitting them to theoretical isochrones—evolutionary tracks for stars of the same age but different masses. This approach incorporates mass and composition but includes uncertainties from model limitations.[98][99] For pre-main-sequence low-mass stars, the lithium depletion boundary (LDB) method detects the mass threshold where lithium is fully depleted by convection, yielding precise ages for young clusters (for example, 20–35 million years for NGC 2547).[100] Gyrochronology estimates ages for main-sequence stars using the empirical relation among rotation period, color (as a proxy for mass), and age, with slower rotation indicating greater age due to magnetic braking. The method is calibrated for ages from about 0.67 to 14 billion years, with uncertainties around 15%.[101][102] In star clusters, where members share a common formation time, ages are determined more reliably from collective features. The main-sequence turnoff—the hottest point where stars depart the main sequence to become giants—reveals cluster age, since higher-mass stars evolve faster. Globular clusters typically show turnoffs indicating ages over 10 billion years.[103] White dwarf cooling sequences provide an independent constraint by measuring cooling times from post-main-sequence remnants, yielding lower limits on cluster age (for example, about 4.3 billion years for M67). These approaches often converge to confirm ages, particularly for ancient populations.[104] Stellar ages also trace galactic chemical evolution through the age-metallicity relation. Older populations, especially in the inner disk, generally exhibit lower metallicities due to slower enrichment over time. This gradient, observed in open clusters spanning 1 million to several billion years, reflects variations in star formation efficiency and gas inflows, with metallicity increasing toward younger, outer regions. Such patterns connect stellar chronology to chemical composition.[105][106]

Rotation

Stellar rotation rates vary widely and are typically quantified by the projected equatorial velocity $ v \sin i $, where $ i $ is the inclination of the rotation axis relative to the line of sight. For the Sun, a main-sequence G-type star, the equatorial rotation velocity is approximately 2 km/s, corresponding to a sidereal rotation period of about 25 days.[107] In contrast, young or massive stars rotate much faster; Be stars, for example, often exhibit $ v \sin i $ values approaching 400 km/s near their critical rotation limits. These rates are primarily measured through spectroscopic analysis of Doppler broadening in absorption lines, as rotation causes differential redshifting on the receding limb and blueshifting on the approaching limb, widening the line profiles proportionally to $ v \sin i $.[108] For stars with prominent surface features like starspots, rotation periods can be inferred from periodic photometric variations as these spots rotate into and out of view, as seen in the Sun. Over a star's lifetime, rotation evolves through angular momentum transport and loss. During the protostellar phase, conservation of angular momentum during contraction is balanced by interactions with the accretion disk, which extracts excess spin to regulate early rotation rates and enable disk formation.[109] On the main sequence, magnetic braking from stellar winds slows rotation, following the empirical Skumanich law where $ v \propto t^{-1/2} $ for solar-type stars.[110] Fast rotation induces structural distortions, transforming stars into oblate spheroids with equatorial radii up to 50% larger than polar radii at critical speeds, as centrifugal forces counteract gravity more effectively at the equator.[111] In rapidly rotating massive stars, this oblateness promotes anisotropic mass loss, with enhanced equatorial ejection due to reduced effective gravity, leading to the formation of circumstellar decretion disks in Be stars.[112]

Magnetic activity

Stellar magnetic activity arises from the generation and evolution of magnetic fields within stars, primarily driven by internal dynamo processes. These fields vary widely in strength, from the Sun's global dipole field of approximately 1–2 gauss (G) to localized concentrations in sunspots reaching 1–4 kilogauss (kG). In other main-sequence stars, average surface fields range from a few gauss in solar-like stars to up to 20–30 kG in chemically peculiar A-type stars, while neutron stars known as magnetars exhibit the most extreme fields, on the order of 10¹⁴–10¹⁵ G.[113][114] Magnetic fields in stars are generated through two primary mechanisms. In stars with convective envelopes, such as the Sun and other cool main-sequence stars, dynamo action in the convective zone converts kinetic energy from plasma motions into magnetic energy via the α-ω dynamo process, where helical turbulence (α-effect) and differential rotation (ω-effect) amplify and shear the field. In contrast, stars with radiative interiors, like intermediate-mass main-sequence stars, may retain "fossil" fields—relic magnetic configurations inherited from the star's formation and stabilized by stable stratification, potentially reaching strengths of 10–100 kG without ongoing dynamo activity.[115][116][117] Observations of stellar magnetic fields rely on spectroscopic techniques, particularly the Zeeman effect, which causes splitting and polarization in spectral lines proportional to the field strength and geometry. High-resolution spectropolarimetry reveals these signatures, enabling mapping of surface field topologies, as demonstrated in surveys of cool stars showing predominantly poloidal fields of 1–25 G. Additionally, magnetic activity manifests in non-thermal emissions: radio bursts from coherent electron cyclotron maser processes and X-ray flares from coronal heating, often exceeding solar levels in active stars like RS CVn binaries.[118][119] Many stars exhibit cyclic magnetic activity analogous to the Sun's 11-year Schwabe cycle, where field polarity reverses and sunspot-like features modulate over decades, driven by dynamo wave propagation. These cycles, observed via photometric variability and chromospheric indicators like Ca II H&K lines, scale with rotation period—faster rotators show shorter cycles and stronger fields—extending to solar-like oscillations in Kepler targets spanning 2–20 years.[115][120]

Kinematics

Kinematics describes the motions of stars through space relative to the observer and the broader galactic framework. These motions are quantified through three primary components: proper motion, radial velocity, and the resulting space velocity, which together reveal the three-dimensional trajectories of stars. Measurements of these velocities are essential for understanding stellar populations, galactic structure, and dynamical evolution.[121] Proper motion refers to the apparent angular displacement of a star across the celestial sphere with respect to more distant background stars, caused by the star's transverse velocity perpendicular to the line of sight. It is typically expressed in arcseconds per year and is measured by comparing the star's position over time using astrometric observations from telescopes like Hipparcos or Gaia. Most stars exhibit small proper motions on the order of 0.1 arcseconds per year, but nearby stars can show larger values due to their proximity. For instance, Barnard's Star, located about 6 light-years from the Sun, has the highest known proper motion of 10.3 arcseconds per year, making it appear to shift noticeably against the stellar backdrop over decades.[121][122] Radial velocity measures the component of a star's motion along the line of sight, toward or away from the observer, and is determined spectroscopically via the Doppler effect. The shift in the wavelength of spectral lines is given by the formula $ v_r = c \frac{\Delta \lambda}{\lambda} $, where $ v_r $ is the radial velocity, $ c $ is the speed of light, $ \Delta \lambda $ is the change in wavelength, and $ \lambda $ is the rest wavelength; positive values indicate recession and negative values approach. This non-relativistic approximation holds for stellar velocities much less than $ c $, with typical values ranging from tens to hundreds of km/s. Instruments like HARPS or ESPRESSO achieve precisions down to meters per second, enabling detection of subtle motions.[123] The full space velocity of a star is obtained by combining proper motion, radial velocity, and distance (via parallax) to compute the three-dimensional velocity vector. In the galactic coordinate system, this is often decomposed into components $ U $, $ V $, and $ W $, where $ U $ is directed toward the galactic center, $ V $ follows the galactic rotation, and $ W $ points toward the north galactic pole, all relative to the local standard of rest (LSR). These components typically range from -100 to +100 km/s for disk stars near the Sun, with the Sun's motion relative to the LSR being approximately $ (U, V, W) = (11, 12, 7) $ km/s.[124] Velocity dispersion, the standard deviation of these components within a stellar population, quantifies the random motions and increases with age due to dynamical heating; for example, old disk stars show dispersions of about 50 km/s in each direction, compared to 20 km/s for young stars. Stars follow bound orbits within the Milky Way's gravitational potential, influenced by the galactic disk, bulge, and dark matter halo, leading to epicyclic motions around circular orbits. The orbital dynamics are governed by the galaxy's rotation curve, with stars in the solar neighborhood orbiting at about 220 km/s. The local escape velocity, beyond which stars would be unbound from the galaxy, is approximately 550 km/s at the Sun's position, derived from the high-velocity tail of stellar distributions observed by Gaia. Hypervelocity stars exceeding this threshold, often ejected from the galactic center, provide probes of the potential's depth.[125]

Radiation and energy output

Luminosity

Luminosity is the total energy radiated by a star per unit time, measured in watts or in solar luminosities (L⊙, where L⊙ = 3.828 × 10²⁶ W).[126] For a star approximated as a blackbody, luminosity follows the Stefan-Boltzmann law:
L=4πR2σT\eff4 L = 4\pi R^2 \sigma T_{\eff}^4
where RR is the radius, T\effT_{\eff} the effective temperature, and σ\sigma the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.670 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴).[127] Stellar luminosities range from about 10⁻⁴ L⊙ for faint red dwarfs to over 10⁶ L⊙ for massive hypergiants.[87] For main-sequence stars, luminosity depends primarily on mass, following the empirical relation LM3.5L \propto M^{3.5}.[41] This scaling varies in later evolutionary stages; for example, red giants can increase luminosity by factors of thousands as they expand.[128] Astronomers determine bolometric luminosity from observations by applying a bolometric correction, which accounts for energy emitted outside the observed wavelength band through integration of the full spectral energy distribution.[129] The correction depends on spectral type and temperature, with more negative values for cooler stars due to higher infrared emission.[130]

Magnitude and brightness

The apparent magnitude of a star quantifies its brightness as observed from Earth, providing a logarithmic measure of the flux received by an observer.[131] This scale is inverse, such that brighter objects have smaller or negative magnitudes, while fainter ones have larger positive values; for instance, Vega serves as the zero-point reference with an apparent magnitude of 0 in the visual band.[132] The relationship between apparent magnitude $ m $ and flux $ F $ is given by the formula $ m = -2.5 \log_{10} F + C $, where $ C $ is a constant zero-point determined by the photometric system.[133] Absolute magnitude represents a star's intrinsic brightness, standardized as the apparent magnitude it would have if placed at a distance of 10 parsecs from Earth, allowing direct comparisons of stellar luminosities independent of distance.[134] The conversion from apparent to absolute magnitude $ M $ uses the formula $ M = m - 5 \log_{10} (d / 10) $, where $ d $ is the distance in parsecs.[135] This distance modulus $ m - M $ quantifies the dimming effect due to distance and is particularly applied to nearby stars whose distances are measured via trigonometric parallax, where $ d = 1 / p $ and $ p $ is the parallax angle in arcseconds.[136] Interstellar extinction complicates these measurements by dimming a star's apparent magnitude through absorption and scattering of light by dust grains along the line of sight, with the effect being more pronounced at shorter wavelengths.[137] Corrections for extinction are typically made using color excesses, such as $ E(B-V) $, which measures the reddening of a star's colors compared to unreddened standards of the same spectral type, enabling the estimation of total visual extinction $ A_V \approx 3.1 E(B-V) $ via standard interstellar laws.[138] These adjustments ensure that observed magnitudes more accurately reflect a star's true brightness at its distance.

Classification

Spectral classification

The Morgan-Keenan (MK) system, introduced in 1943, provides a standardized framework for classifying stars based on the absorption and emission lines in their spectra, which primarily reflect the physical conditions in stellar atmospheres such as temperature and ionization states.[139] This two-dimensional system uses spectral types to denote temperature and luminosity classes for size and evolutionary stage, but the core spectral sequence—O, B, A, F, G, K, M—arranges stars from hottest to coolest, with O-type stars reaching surface temperatures of approximately 30,000–50,000 K and M-type stars around 2,500–3,500 K.[140][141] The sequence correlates with the dominance of specific spectral features: O stars show strong absorption lines of ionized helium (He II) due to high ionization at extreme temperatures, while M stars exhibit prominent molecular bands of titanium oxide (TiO) from cooler atmospheres where molecules form readily.[141] Each main spectral type is further subdivided into 10 numerical subclasses from 0 (hottest within the type) to 9 (coolest), allowing finer distinctions based on the ratios of line strengths, such as the gradual weakening of He II lines and strengthening of neutral hydrogen (Balmer) lines from O to A types.[142] For example, the Sun is classified as G2, indicating a mid-G type star with surface temperature around 5,800 K, where calcium (Ca II) lines like the H and K lines are prominent alongside moderate hydrogen absorption.[142] These subclasses enable precise temperature estimates, as the line ratios evolve systematically with thermal conditions, forming the basis for quantitative spectral analysis.[143] In the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram, which plots stellar luminosity against temperature (or spectral type), main sequence stars illustrate a clear trend where earlier (hotter) spectral types like O and B correspond to higher luminosities due to their larger radii and higher fusion rates, while later types like K and M are fainter.[144] This integration highlights how spectral classification reveals evolutionary patterns, with the main sequence spanning from luminous O stars to dim M dwarfs.[145] Certain stars deviate from the standard OBAFGKM sequence due to unusual compositions or evolutionary states, leading to peculiar classes. Carbon stars, denoted as type C, are cool giants with enhanced carbon-to-oxygen ratios, displaying strong absorption bands from carbon molecules like C₂ (Swan bands) and CN, which alter their red spectra compared to typical M stars.[146] Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars represent another peculiar category, characterized by hot temperatures (often >20,000 K) and spectra dominated by broad emission lines of helium, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, resulting from intense stellar winds that eject material at speeds exceeding 2,000 km/s and expose the star's hot core.[147] These classes, though rare, provide critical insights into advanced stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis.[148]

Luminosity classes

Luminosity classes form a key part of the Morgan-Keenan (MK) system of stellar classification, which combines spectral type (surface temperature) with Roman numerals to indicate intrinsic luminosity and evolutionary stage. Introduced in 1943, the system distinguishes stars of similar temperature but different brightness, such as main-sequence dwarfs from giants and supergiants.[149][150] The classes are assigned as follows, with finer subdivisions among supergiants:
ClassDescription
Ia-0Hypergiants (extremely luminous supergiants)
IaBright supergiants
IabIntermediate supergiants
IbSupergiants
IIBright giants
IIIGiants
IVSubgiants
VMain-sequence (dwarfs)
VISubdwarfs
VIIWhite dwarfs (sometimes denoted as D)
These range from highly luminous evolved stars in class I to compact remnants in class VII, with class V marking the stable hydrogen-burning phase where most stars spend the bulk of their lives.[150] Luminosity classes are determined from absorption line profiles in stellar spectra, particularly their widths and strengths, which are sensitive to surface gravity. Dwarfs (class V) show broader lines due to higher gravity and atmospheric pressure, while giants and supergiants (classes III and I) exhibit narrower lines from lower gravity in expanded envelopes. Ionization states and specific line ratios provide additional refinement.[151] On the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, class V stars form the main sequence from hot O-type dwarfs to cool M-type dwarfs; class III giants occupy the giant branch to the right; class I supergiants cluster at high luminosities across a broad temperature range; subgiants (IV) bridge the main sequence and giant branch; and subdwarfs (VI) lie below the main sequence due to lower metallicity. This arrangement reflects evolutionary tracks from the main sequence to giant and supergiant phases.[151] Examples include Rigel (B8 Ia), a blue supergiant; Betelgeuse (M2 Iab), a red supergiant; and the Sun (G2 V), a typical main-sequence dwarf.[150][152][153]

Variability

Types of variable stars

Variable stars are categorized as intrinsic or extrinsic depending on whether brightness variations originate from internal physical processes or external geometric effects such as eclipses or rotation. The General Catalogue of Variable Stars (GCVS) provides the standard classification system, encompassing dozens of subtypes defined by light curve shapes, periods, and amplitudes.[154] Intrinsic variables change brightness due to internal mechanisms. Pulsating variables, the largest group, undergo periodic expansions and contractions that alter radius and surface temperature, producing distinctive light curves. Prominent subtypes include:
  • δ Scuti stars: short-period pulsators (0.02–0.3 days) with amplitudes typically low (≤0.1 mag in V for low-amplitude δ Scuti or LADS; >0.1 mag for high-amplitude δ Scuti or HADS), often occurring in main-sequence or subgiant phases.[155]
  • RR Lyrae stars: short-period variables (0.2–1 day) common in globular clusters as Population II objects; they serve as standard candles due to consistent absolute magnitudes.[156]
  • Classical Cepheids: yellow supergiants with periods of 1–70 days; their period-luminosity relation correlates longer periods with higher luminosities, enabling precise distance measurements across the Milky Way and beyond.[157]
  • Mira variables: long-period asymptotic giant branch stars with periods of 80–1000 days and large amplitude variations (up to 10 magnitudes).[158]
  • RV Tauri stars: supergiants with periods of 30–150 days, characterized by alternating deep and shallow minima in their light curves.
Eruptive intrinsic variables display sudden, irregular brightness increases followed by gradual fades. Novae, for instance, undergo explosive outbursts that can brighten by ~10 magnitudes over days, typically occurring in binary systems with accretion onto a white dwarf.[159] In contrast, extrinsic variables exhibit brightness changes imposed by orbital geometry or companions, without intrinsic luminosity alterations. Eclipsing binaries produce periodic dips as one star occults the other during orbital alignment; Algol is a classic example with a period of ~2.87 days. Rotating variables show quasi-periodic modulation from surface features such as starspots, with periods matching the stellar rotation cycle (typically days to weeks). Light curve analysis, often using Fourier techniques or template matching, is essential for identifying variable types and subtypes, revealing periods ranging from hours (e.g., δ Scuti stars) to over a year (some Mira variables).

Variability mechanisms

Stellar variability arises from several physical mechanisms that alter a star's energy output or surface distribution, leading to observed changes in brightness. These include pulsations driven by internal instabilities, rotational modulation from surface features, explosive eruptions on compact objects, and stochastic fluctuations from turbulent processes. Each mechanism operates under specific stellar conditions, producing distinct patterns of variability. Pulsations cause periodic changes in a star's radius and temperature, resulting in luminosity variations. The primary driver is the κ-mechanism, where opacity (κ) in ionized layers increases during compression, trapping heat and expanding the envelope; subsequent cooling reduces opacity, allowing energy release and contraction. [160] In classical Cepheid variables, this process leads to radius changes of approximately 10% over their pulsation cycles. [161] Rotational variability stems from the modulation of stellar brightness as dark, cooler starspots rotate into and out of the observer's line of sight. Starspots form due to magnetic activity and exhibit significant temperature contrasts relative to the surrounding photosphere, reducing local emission. For instance, on the Sun, sunspot umbrae reach temperatures of about 4000 K compared to the photospheric average of 5800 K. [162] This contrast causes periodic dips in flux with periods matching the star's rotation rate. Eruptive variability occurs in systems involving compact objects, such as classical novae, where hydrogen-rich material accretes onto a white dwarf surface. Accumulation triggers a thermonuclear runaway in the accreted shell, causing a rapid brightness increase and ejection of material. [163] These outbursts propel mass at velocities around 1000 km/s, dispersing the envelope and fading the star's light over weeks to months. [164] Stochastic variability manifests as irregular, non-periodic fluctuations, particularly in evolved stars like red giants, due to turbulent convection in their extended envelopes. Large-scale convective cells stochastically excite and dampen surface motions, producing low-frequency noise in brightness akin to granulation on a grander scale. [165] This mechanism dominates in stars with vigorous outer convection zones, leading to amplitudes that can exceed 0.1 magnitudes over timescales of days to years. [166]

Internal structure

Stellar layers

Stars have distinct internal layers, from the dense core to the tenuous outer atmosphere. These layers differ in composition, temperature, density, and energy transport, depending on the star's mass and evolutionary stage. In main-sequence stars like the Sun, the core spans about 20–25% of the radius, while the outer atmosphere remains extremely thin relative to the total size.[167] The core is the innermost region where nuclear fusion generates the star's energy. It reaches extreme conditions—temperatures around 15 million K and densities up to 150 g/cm³ in solar-type stars—enabling hydrogen-to-helium fusion. In low-mass main-sequence stars, the core occupies roughly 20% of the radius; in white dwarfs, the entire star is a degenerate core supported by electron degeneracy pressure rather than thermal pressure.[2] Surrounding the core are the radiative and convective zones that transport energy outward. In low-mass stars like the Sun, a radiative zone extends from about 25% to 70% of the radius, where photons diffuse slowly due to high opacity; beyond it lies a convective envelope occupying the outer 30%, where hot plasma rises and cools in circulating cells. High-mass stars reverse this structure, featuring a convective core and radiative envelope, due to differences in opacity and temperature gradients.[168] The photosphere is the visible "surface," a thin layer 100–500 km thick where optical photons escape freely. In the Sun, its temperature is about 5,800 K and its density around 10^{-7} g/cm³. Convection from below produces granulation—bright, rising hot cells 700–1,000 km in diameter surrounded by darker cooling lanes—creating the star's mottled appearance in high-resolution images.[169] Above the photosphere lies the chromosphere, a sparse layer 2,000–3,000 km thick with temperatures rising from about 4,000 K to over 20,000 K. It emits strong ultraviolet lines such as Ca II and Mg II, driven by magnetic fields. The transition region, a narrow interface about 100 km thick, sharply heats plasma to coronal temperatures up to 500,000 K.[170][171] The outermost corona extends millions of kilometers with temperatures of 1–2 million K and extremely low densities (10^{-15} g/cm³ or less). This hot, ionized plasma generates the solar wind and X-ray emission, with structure shaped by magnetic fields. In other stars, coronal properties vary with activity levels, appearing more prominent in younger or rapidly rotating stars.[170][171][172]

Energy transport processes

In stars, energy generated in the core is transported outward to the surface primarily through two mechanisms: radiative diffusion and convection. Radiative diffusion dominates in regions where the temperature gradient is shallow enough for photons to carry the energy flux without triggering instability, while convection takes over in zones requiring a steeper gradient, involving bulk motion of plasma. These processes operate within the stellar layers, such as the radiative core and convective envelopes, to maintain hydrostatic equilibrium.[167] Radiative diffusion occurs as photons are repeatedly absorbed and re-emitted by stellar material, effectively random-walking outward due to the temperature gradient. The energy flux $ F $ in this regime is given by the diffusion approximation:
F=c3κρ(aT4), F = -\frac{c}{3 \kappa \rho} \nabla (a T^4),
where $ c $ is the speed of light, $ \kappa $ is the opacity (measuring the material's resistance to photon passage), $ \rho $ is the density, $ a $ is the radiation constant, and $ T $ is the temperature. This can be rewritten as $ F = -\frac{4 a c T^3}{3 \kappa \rho} \nabla T $, highlighting the dependence on the temperature gradient $ \nabla T $. Opacity $ \kappa $ arises from processes like Thomson scattering on electrons or bound-free transitions, and it is often averaged using the Rosseland mean to account for frequency-dependent absorption across the spectrum. In the Sun's radiative interior, for instance, electron scattering opacity $ \kappa \approx 0.2 $ (in cm²/g) limits the mean free path of photons to about 1 cm, resulting in a random walk time of roughly 170,000 years for energy to reach the surface.[173][174][175] Convection becomes the dominant transport mechanism in regions where radiative diffusion alone cannot carry the required flux, leading to instability. Hotter, less dense plasma rises buoyantly as adiabatic bubbles, while cooler, denser material sinks, efficiently mixing energy outward. This occurs when the radiative temperature gradient exceeds the adiabatic gradient, as defined by the Schwarzschild criterion for convective instability: $ \nabla_{\rm rad} > \nabla_{\rm ad} $, where $ \nabla_{\rm rad} = \left( \frac{d \ln T}{d \ln P} \right){\rm rad} $ is the gradient needed for radiative transport and $ \nabla{\rm ad} = \left( \frac{\partial \ln T}{\partial \ln P} \right){\rm ad} $ is the adiabatic value, approximately 0.4 for an ideal monatomic gas. In the mixing-length theory, the convective flux is approximated as $ F{\rm conv} \propto \rho c_P T (\nabla_{\rm rad} - \nabla_{\rm ad})^{3/2} $, with the mixing length scaling as the pressure scale height. This process is crucial in the Sun's outer convection zone, spanning from about 0.7 to 1 solar radius.[174][173][176] The boundaries between radiative and convective zones, known as zonal boundaries, mark transitions where $ \nabla_{\rm rad} = \nabla_{\rm ad} $. In the Sun, the tachocline represents such a boundary at the base of the convection zone, around 0.7 solar radii, where rotation shifts from differential in the convective envelope to rigid in the radiative interior, influencing dynamo-generated magnetic fields. This thin shear layer, about 0.05 solar radii thick, arises from the interplay of meridional circulation and magnetic confinement.[177][178] In massive stars, convective motions often penetrate beyond these formal boundaries through overshoot mixing, where plumes overshoot into stable regions by a distance typically parameterized as $ d_{\rm ov} = \alpha_{\rm ov} H_P $, with $ \alpha_{\rm ov} \approx 0.1-0.3 $ and $ H_P $ the pressure scale height. This enhances mixing of fresh fuel into the core, extending main-sequence lifetimes and altering evolutionary tracks, as seen in models of stars with masses above 8 solar masses where convective cores dominate early evolution.[179][173]

Nuclear fusion processes

Hydrogen fusion

Hydrogen fusion is the primary nuclear process that powers main-sequence stars, converting hydrogen into helium in their cores and releasing energy through the mass defect in accordance with Einstein's equation E=mc2E = mc^2.[180] This process occurs at temperatures of about 10–15 million Kelvin, where quantum tunneling enables protons to overcome electrostatic repulsion.[181] In low-mass stars like the Sun, the proton-proton (pp) chain dominates, while in more massive stars the CNO cycle prevails due to its much stronger temperature dependence.[40] The pp-chain branches all achieve the net reaction 41H4He+2e++2νe+26.7MeV4^1\mathrm{H} \to ^4\mathrm{He} + 2e^+ + 2\nu_e + 26.7\,\mathrm{MeV}, where four protons form a helium nucleus, two positrons, two electron neutrinos, and energy primarily from gamma rays and positron annihilation.[180] The dominant branch, ppI (approximately 83% in the Sun), proceeds as follows:
1H+1H2H+e++νe,2H+1H3He+γ,3He+3He4He+21H. \begin{align*} ^1\mathrm{H} + ^1\mathrm{H} &\to ^2\mathrm{H} + e^+ + \nu_e, \\ ^2\mathrm{H} + ^1\mathrm{H} &\to ^3\mathrm{He} + \gamma, \\ ^3\mathrm{He} + ^3\mathrm{He} &\to ^4\mathrm{He} + 2^1\mathrm{H}. \end{align*}
This branch produces low-energy neutrinos (~0.42 MeV) from the first step.[181] The ppII branch (approximately 17%) involves 3He+4He7Be+γ^3\mathrm{He} + ^4\mathrm{He} \to ^7\mathrm{Be} + \gamma, followed by electron capture 7Be+e7Li+νe^7\mathrm{Be} + e^- \to ^7\mathrm{Li} + \nu_e (emitting ~0.86 MeV neutrinos), and 7Li+1H24He^7\mathrm{Li} + ^1\mathrm{H} \to 2^4\mathrm{He}. The rare ppIII branch (~0.02%) proceeds from 7Be+1H8B+γ^7\mathrm{Be} + ^1\mathrm{H} \to ^8\mathrm{B} + \gamma, then 8B8Be+e++νe^8\mathrm{B} \to ^8\mathrm{Be} + e^+ + \nu_e (high-energy ~10 MeV neutrinos), and 8Be24He^8\mathrm{Be} \to 2^4\mathrm{He}.[181] These branches yield distinct neutrino spectra, allowing indirect probing of the solar core.[182] In stars exceeding about 1.3 solar masses, core temperatures surpass 16 million Kelvin, favoring the CNO cycle as the primary mechanism, with its rate scaling as T1618T^{16-18} versus T4T^4 for the pp-chain.[40] The cycle acts catalytically, using carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen as intermediaries to achieve the net reaction 41H4He+2e++2νe+26MeV4^1\mathrm{H} \to ^4\mathrm{He} + 2e^+ + 2\nu_e + 26\,\mathrm{MeV}, without net consumption of CNO nuclei.[183] The main CN cycle steps are:
\begin{align*} ^{12}\mathrm{C} + ^1\mathrm{H} &\to ^{13}\mathrm{N} + \gamma, \quad ^{13}\mathrm{N} \to ^{13}\mathrm{C} + e^+ + \nu_e, \\ ^{13}\mathrm{C} + ^1\mathrm{H} &\to ^{14}\mathrm{N} + \gamma, \\ ^{14}\mathrm{N} + ^1\mathrm{H} &\to ^{15}\mathrm{O} + \gamma, \quad ^{15}\mathrm{O} \to ^{15}\mathrm{N} + e^+ + \nu_e, \\ ^{15}\mathrm{N} + ^1\mathrm{H} &\to ^{12}\mathrm{C} + ^4\mathrm{He}. \end{align*}
Neutrinos from 13N^{13}\mathrm{N} (~1.2 MeV) and 15O^{15}\mathrm{O} (~1.7 MeV) branches indicate CNO activity.[183] Early solar neutrino detections revealed a deficit relative to predictions, termed the solar neutrino problem.[182] This was resolved by neutrino oscillations, in which electron neutrinos convert to muon or tau neutrinos via the Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effect in solar matter, as confirmed by Super-Kamiokande and SNO. Borexino has since detected low-energy pp-chain neutrinos and CNO neutrinos, validating fusion models.[182]

Advanced fusion stages

In stars with initial masses exceeding about 8 M⊙, core hydrogen exhaustion leads to contraction and ignition of helium fusion via the triple-alpha process at temperatures around 100 million K (10^8 K). This fuses three ^4He nuclei (alpha particles) into ^12C through the intermediate unstable ^8Be:
4He+4He8Be ^4\mathrm{He} + ^4\mathrm{He} \rightleftharpoons ^8\mathrm{Be}
8Be+4He12C12C+γ ^8\mathrm{Be} + ^4\mathrm{He} \rightarrow ^{12}\mathrm{C}^* \rightarrow ^{12}\mathrm{C} + \gamma
The reaction releases approximately 7.3 MeV per ^12C nucleus formed, maintaining hydrostatic equilibrium.[184][185] After helium exhaustion, further contraction raises core temperatures to approximately 600 million K (6 × 10^8 K), igniting carbon burning. ^12C nuclei fuse via channels such as ^12C + ^12C → ^20Ne + α, ^12C + ^12C → ^23Na + p, and ^12C + ^12C → ^24Mg + γ, occurring in convective cores. Subsequent stages fuse neon, oxygen, and silicon, progressively building heavier elements toward the iron peak. Oxygen burning at 1.5–2.6 × 10^9 K fuses ^16O nuclei to produce ^28Si, ^32S, and intermediates including argon and calcium. Silicon burning follows at around 3 × 10^9 K, where ^28Si and products undergo a network of alpha captures, proton captures, and photodisintegrations to form iron-group nuclei such as ^56Ni (which decays to ^56Fe). Successive alpha captures build nuclei up to ^56Fe, the most tightly bound stable isotope. At the iron peak, further fusion becomes endothermic (Q < 0), with photodisintegration dominating as disassembly energy exceeds release, ending energy-generating fusion.[186][187]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.