Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Sexual assault
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Violence against women |
|---|
| Murder |
| Sexual assault and rape |
| Disfigurement |
| Other issues |
|
| International legal framework |
| Related topics |
Sexual assault (SA) is an act of sexual abuse in which one intentionally sexually touches another person without that person's consent, or coerces or physically forces a person to engage in a sexual act against their will.[1] It is a form of sexual violence that includes child sexual abuse, groping, rape (forced sexual penetration, no matter how slight), drug facilitated sexual assault, and the torture of the person in a sexual manner.[1][2][3]
Definition
[edit]Generally, sexual assault is defined as unwanted sexual contact.[4] The National Center for Victims of Crime states:[5]
Sexual assault takes many forms including attacks such as rape or attempted rape, as well as any unwanted sexual contact or threats. Usually a sexual assault occurs when someone touches any part of another person's body in a sexual way, even through clothes, without that person's consent.
In the United States, the definition of sexual assault varies widely among the individual states. However, in most states sexual assault occurs when there is lack of consent from one of the individuals involved. Consent must take place between two adults who are not incapacitated and consent may change, by being withdrawn, at any time during the sexual act.[6] Sexual assault can be defined as violation of consent according to standards of substantive equality or formal equality.[7]
Types
[edit]Child sexual abuse
[edit]Child sexual abuse is a form of child abuse in which an adult or older adolescent abuses a child for sexual stimulation.[8][9] Forms of child sexual abuse include asking or pressuring a child to engage in sexual activities (regardless of the outcome), indecent exposure of the genitals to a child, displaying pornography to a child, actual sexual contact against a child, physical contact with the child's genitals, viewing of the child's genitalia without physical contact, or using a child to produce child pornography,[8][10][11] including live streaming sexual abuse.[12]
The effects of child sexual abuse include depression,[13] post-traumatic stress disorder,[14] anxiety,[15] propensity to re-victimization in adulthood,[16] physical injury to the child, and increased risk for future interpersonal violence perpetration among males, among other problems.[17][18] Sexual assault among teenagers has been shown to lead to worse school performance, an increase in mental health problems, and social exclusion.[19][20] Sexual abuse by a family member is a form of incest. It is more common than other forms of sexual assault on a child and can result in more serious and long-term psychological trauma, especially in the case of parental incest.[21]
Approximately 15 to 25 percent of women and 5 to 15 percent of men were sexually abused when they were children.[22][23][24][25][26][27] Most sexual abuse offenders are acquainted with their victims. Approximately 30 percent of the perpetrators are relatives of the child – most often brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, uncles, aunts or cousins. Around 60 percent are other acquaintances such as friends of the family, babysitters, or neighbors. Strangers are the offenders in approximately 10 percent of child sexual abuse cases.[22]
Studies have shown that the psychological damage is particularly severe when sexual assault is committed by parents against children due to the incestuous nature of the assault.[21] Incest between a child and a related adult has been identified as the most widespread form of child sexual abuse with a huge capacity for damage to a child.[21] Often, sexual assault on a child is not reported by the child for several of the following reasons:
- children are too young to recognize their victimization or put it into words
- they were threatened or bribed by the abuser
- they feel confused by fearing the abuser
- they are afraid no one will believe them
- they blame themselves or believe the abuse is a punishment
- they feel guilty for consequences to the perpetrator[28]
In addition, many states have criminalized sexual contact between teachers or school administrators and students, even if the student is over the age of consent.[29]
Domestic violence
[edit]Domestic violence is violence or other abuse by one person against another in a domestic setting, such as in marriage or cohabitation. It is strongly correlated with sexual assault. Not only can domestic abuse be emotional, physical, psychological and financial, but it can be sexual. Some of the signs of sexual abuse are similar to those of domestic violence.[30]
Elderly sexual assault
[edit]About 30 percent of people age 65 or older who are sexually assaulted in the U.S. report it to the police.[31] Assailants may include strangers, caretakers, adult children, spouses and fellow facility residents, although perpetrators of elder sexual assault are less likely to be related to the victim than perpetrators of other types of elder abuse.[31][32]
Groping
[edit]The term groping is used to define the touching or fondling of another person in a sexual way without the person's consent. Groping may occur under or over clothing.
Rape
[edit]Outside of law, the term rape (sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration carried out against a person without that person's consent) is often used interchangeably with sexual assault.[33][34] Although closely related, the two terms are technically distinct in most jurisdictions. Sexual assault typically includes rape and other forms of non-consensual sexual activity.[4][35]
Abbey et al. state that female victims are much more likely to be assaulted by an acquaintance, such as a friend or co-worker, a dating partner, an ex-boyfriend or a husband or other intimate partner than by a complete stranger.[36] In a study of hospital emergency room treatments for rape, Kaufman et al. stated that the male victims as a group sustained more physical trauma and were more likely to have been a victim of multiple assaults from multiple assailants. It was also stated that male victims were more likely to have been held captive longer.[37]
In the U.S., rape is a crime committed primarily against youth.[38] A national telephone survey on violence against women conducted by the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that 18% of women surveyed had experienced a completed or attempted rape at some time in their lives. Of these, 22% were younger than 12 years and 32% were between 12 and 17 years old when they were first raped.[39][27]
In the U.K., attempted rape under the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 is a 'sexual offence' within section 31(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991.[40]
The removal of a condom during intercourse without the consent of the sex partner, known as stealthing, may be treated as a sexual assault or rape in some jurisdictions.[41]
Sexual harassment
[edit]Sexual harassment is intimidation, bullying or coercion of a sexual nature. It may also be defined as the unwelcome or inappropriate promise of rewards in exchange for sexual favors.[42] The legal and social definition of what constitutes sexual harassment differ widely by culture. Sexual harassment includes a wide range of behaviors from seemingly mild transgressions to serious forms of abuse. Some forms of sexual harassment overlap with sexual assault.[43][full citation needed]
In the United States, sexual harassment is a form of discrimination which violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC): "Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment when submission to or rejection of this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual's employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual's work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment."[44]
In the United States:
- 79% of victims are women, 21% are men
- 51% are harassed by a supervisor
- Business, Trade, Banking, and Finance are the biggest industries where sexual harassment occurs
- 12% received threats of termination if they did not comply with their requests
- 26,000 people in the armed forces were assaulted in 2012[18]
- 302 of the 2,558 cases pursued by victims were prosecuted
- 38% of the cases were committed by someone of a higher rank
- Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion. It generally applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including federal, state, and local governments. Title VII also applies to private and public colleges and universities, employment agencies, and labor organizations.[19]
- "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer ... to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."[20][This quote needs a citation][full citation needed]
Mass sexual assault
[edit]Mass sexual assault takes place in public places and in crowds. It involves large group of people surrounding and assaulting the other gender and engaging in conduct such as groping, manual penetration, and frottage, but usually stopping short of penile rape.
Emotional and psychological effects
[edit]Aside from physical traumas, rape and other sexual assault often result in long-term emotional effects, particularly in child victims. These can include, but are not limited to: denial, learned helplessness, genophobia (fear of sex), anger, self-blame, anxiety, shame, nightmares, fear, depression, flashbacks, guilt, rationalization, moodswings, numbness, hypersexuality, loneliness, social anxiety, difficulty trusting oneself or others, and difficulty concentrating.[28]
Sexual assault increases an individual's risk to developing psychopathology.[45] It is most strongly related to the development of suicidality and trauma-related disorders (including post-traumatic stress disorder), as well as the development of bipolar and obsessive–compulsive disorders.[45] Experiencing sexual assault also increases the risk of developing anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, eating disorders, addiction, or other psychopathologies.[45] Individuals who develop psychological disorders following sexual assault have increased frequency and severity of psychopathology compared with individuals who have not experienced sexual assault.[45]
Family and friends of individuals who have been sexually assaulted experience emotional scarring, including a strong desire for revenge, a desire to "fix" the problem and/or move on, and a rationalization that "it wasn't that bad".[28]
Physical effects
[edit]While sexual assault, including rape, can result in physical trauma, many people who experience sexual assault will not suffer any physical injury.[46] Rape myths suggest that the stereotypical victim of sexual violence is a bruised and battered young woman. The central issue in many cases of rape or other sexual assault is whether both parties consented to the sexual activity or whether both parties had the capacity to do so. Thus, physical force resulting in visible physical injury is not always seen. This stereotype can be damaging because people who have experienced sexual assault but have no physical trauma may be less inclined to report to the authorities or to seek health care.[47] However, women who experienced rape or physical violence by a partner were more likely than people who had not experienced this violence to report frequent headaches, chronic pain, difficulty sleeping, activity limitation, poor physical health, and poor mental health.[48]
Economic effects
[edit]Due to rape or sexual assault, or the threat of, there are many resulting impacts on income and commerce at the macro level. Excluding child abuse, each rape or sexual assault costs $5,100 in tangible losses (lost productivity, medical and mental health care, police/fire services, and property damage) and $81,400 in lost quality of life.[49] This issue has been addressed in the Supreme Court. In his dissenting opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court case U.S. v. Morrison, Justice Souter explained that 75% of women never go to the movies alone at night and nearly 50% will not ride public transportation out of fear of rape or sexual assault. It also stated that less than 1% of victims collect damages and 50% of women lose their jobs or quit after the trauma. The court ruled in U.S. v. Morrison that Congress did not have the authority to enact part of the Violence Against Women Act because it did not have a direct impact on commerce. The Commerce Clause of Article I Section VII of the U.S. Constitution gives authority and jurisdiction to the Federal government in matters of interstate commerce. As a result, the victim was unable to sue her attacker in Federal Court.
Sexual assault also has adverse economic effects for survivors on the micro level. For instance, survivors of sexual assault often require time off from work[50] and face increased rates of unemployment.[51] Survivors of rape by an intimate partner lose an average of $69 per day due to unpaid time off from work.[52] Sexual assault is also associated with numerous negative employment consequences, including unpaid time off, diminished work performance, job loss, and inability to work, all of which can lead to lower earnings for survivors.[53]
The ability to test backlogged sexual assault kits and have the results uploaded into CODIS is cost effective in terms of reducing the costs associated with sexual assaults' by spending the money on testing evidence.[54]
Treatment of victims
[edit]In the emergency room, emergency contraceptive medications are offered to women raped by men because about 5% of such rapes result in pregnancy.[55] Preventative medication against sexually transmitted infections are given to victims of all types of sexual assault (especially for the most common diseases like chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis) and a blood serum is collected to test for STIs (such as HIV, hepatitis B and syphilis).[55] Any survivor with abrasions are immunized for tetanus if five years have elapsed since the last immunization.[55] Short-term treatment with a benzodiazepine may help with acute anxiety and antidepressants may be helpful for symptoms of PTSD, depression and panic attacks.[55] Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has also been proposed as a psychiatric treatment for victims of sexual assault.[56] With regard to long term psychological treatment, prolonged exposure therapy has been tested as a method of long-term PTSD treatment for victims of sexual abuse.[57]
Mistreatment of victims
[edit]After the assault, victims may become the target of slut-shaming to cyberbullying. In addition, their credibility may be challenged. During criminal proceedings, publication bans and rape shield laws may operate to protect victims from excessive public scrutiny. Negative social responses to victims' disclosures of sexual assault have the potential to lead to post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Social isolation, following a sexual assault, can result in the victim experiencing a decrease in their self-esteem and likelihood of rejecting unwanted sexual advances in the future.[58] Victims have already been through a traumatic assault and it can be exacerbated the unwillingness of law enforcement to move their case along in the forensic testing process because law enforcement officials develop preconceived notions about the victims willingness to participate in the investigation.[59]
Prevention
[edit]
| Criminology and penology |
|---|
Sexual harassment and assault may be prevented by secondary school,[60] college,[61][62] workplace[63] and public education programs. At least one program for fraternity men produced "sustained behavioral change".[61][64] At least one study showed that creative campaigns with attention grabbing slogans and images that market consent are effective tools to raise awareness of campus sexual assault and related issues.[65]
Several research-based rape prevention programs have been tested and verified through scientific studies. The rape prevention programs that have the strongest empirical data in the research literature include the following:
The Men's and Women's Programs, also known as the One in Four programs, were written by John Foubert.[66] and is focused on increasing empathy toward rape survivors and motivating people to intervene as bystanders in sexual assault situations. Published data shows that high-risk persons who saw the Men's and Women's Program committed 40% fewer acts of sexually coercive behavior than those who did not. They also committed acts of sexual coercion that were eight times less severe than a control group.[67] Further research also shows that people who saw the Men's and Women's Program reported more efficacy in intervening and greater willingness to help as a bystander after seeing the program.[68] Several additional studies are available documenting its efficacy.[61][69][70]
Bringing in the Bystander was written by Victoria Banyard. Its focus is on who bystanders are, when they have helped, and how to intervene as a bystander in risky situations. The program includes a brief empathy induction component and a pledge to intervene in the future. Several studies show strong evidence of favorable outcomes including increased bystander efficacy, increased willingness to intervene as a bystander, and decreased rape myth acceptance.[71][72][73]
The MVP: Mentors in Violence Prevention was written by Jackson Katz. This program focuses on discussing a male bystander who did not intervene when a woman was in danger. An emphasis is placed on encouraging men to be active bystanders, rather than standing by when they notice abuse. The bulk of the presentation is on processing hypothetical scenarios. Outcomes reported in research literature include lower levels of sexism and increased belief that participants could prevent violence against women.[74]
The Green Dot Bystander Intervention program was written by Dorothy Edwards. This program includes both motivational speeches and peer education focused on bystander intervention. Outcomes show that program participation is associated with reductions in rape myth acceptance and increased bystander intervention.[75]
The city of Edmonton, Canada, initiated a public education campaign aimed at potential perpetrators. Posters in bar bathrooms and public transit centers reminded men that "It's not sex when she's wasted" and "It's not sex when he changes his mind". The campaign was so effective that it spread to other cities. "The number of reported sexual assaults fell by 10 per cent last year in Vancouver, after the ads were featured around the city. It was the first time in several years that there was a drop in sexual assault activity."[76]
President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden introduced in September 2014 a nationwide campaign against sexual assault entitled "It's on us". The campaign includes tips against sexual assault, as well as broad scale of private and public pledges to change to provoke a cultural shift, with a focus on student activism, to achieve awareness and prevention nationwide. UC Berkeley, NCAA and Viacom have publicly announced their partnership.[77]
Additionally, CODIS checks whether the qualifying offense sample, DNA taken from an offender for committing a crime, was also a sexual assault. If a person committed sexual offenses in the past, this system would reveal a pattern of serial sexual offending. Using CODIS to compare backlogged rape kit tests can lead to prevention of future sexual assaults.[78]
Prevalence
[edit]Reported by country
[edit]United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) reports compiled from government sources show that more than 250,000 cases of sexual violence were reported to the police annually.[79] The annual recorded sexual assaults per capita for the last available year is shown below for individual countries.[80] The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime categorizes sexual assault and rape as distinct forms of sexual violence, hence the below statistics on sexual assault exclude rape.[81] Definitions of sexual assault differs between countries.
| Country | Sexual assaults per 100,000[80] |
Year |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 | 2023 | |
| 0.5 | 2023 | |
| 14.4 | 2019 | |
| 26.8 | 2023 | |
| 70.7 | 2023 | |
| 0.5 | 2023 | |
| 30.7 | 2023 | |
| 0.1 | 2021 | |
| 2.5 | 2022 | |
| 25.5 | 2023 | |
| 3.1 | 2019 | |
| 61.6 | 2023 | |
| 14.9 | 2022 | |
| 0.1 | 2017 | |
| 67.6 | 2017 | |
| 5.6 | 2020 | |
| 27.2 | 2023 | |
| 2.3 | 2023 | |
| 4.2 | 2020 | |
| 8.1 | 2023 | |
| 12.5 | 2018 | |
| 93.2 | 2023 | |
| 71.7 | 2023 | |
| 11.1 | 2023 | |
| 131.8 | 2023 | |
| 9.2 | 2023 | |
| 2.2 | 2023 | |
| 0.9 | 2023 | |
| 73.8 | 2023 | |
| 75.2 | 2023 | |
| 20.6 | 2023 | |
| 8.3 | 2015 | |
| 53.5 | 2023 | |
| 23.5 | 2022 | |
| 125.9 | 2022 | |
| 17.2 | 2023 | |
| 8.6 | 2021 | |
| 66.5 | 2023 | |
| 72.2 | 2023 | |
| 46.8 | 2023 | |
| 0.1 | 2020 | |
| 6.7 | 2023 | |
| 26.5 | 2023 | |
| 15.6 | 2023 | |
| 3.8 | 2014 | |
| 7.4 | 2023 | |
| 8.6 | 2023 | |
| 15.6 | 2023 | |
| 18.1 | 2023 | |
| 1.0 | 2022 | |
| 37.3 | 2023 | |
| 65.2 | 2023 | |
| 30.9 | 2023 | |
| 4.9 | 2023 | |
| 8.1 | 2023 | |
| 2.0 | 2017 | |
| 0.7 | 2022 | |
| 4.2 | 2021 | |
| 0.1 | 2018 | |
| 14.9 | 2023 | |
| 0.0 | 2023 | |
| 18.6 | 2016 | |
| 3.1 | 2023 | |
| 51.4 | 2014 | |
| 17.3 | 2022 | |
| 1.6 | 2015 | |
| 1.5 | 2023 | |
| 68.7 | 2017 | |
| 17.6 | 2023 | |
| 43.1 | 2023 | |
| 2.4 | 2023 | |
| 0.0 | 2016 | |
| 0.0 | 2023 | |
| 3.9 | 2023 | |
| 13.8 | 2023 | |
| 0.1 | 2023 | |
| 0.2 | 2021 | |
| 1.8 | 2016 | |
| 14.1 | 2023 | |
| 56.3 | 2023 | |
| 99.7 | 2023 | |
| 45.1 | 2023 | |
| 3.2 | 2023 | |
| 2.2 | 2023 | |
| 0.2 | 2022 | |
| 12.7 | 2018 | |
| 39.1 | 2022 | |
| 0.1 | 2023 | |
| 1.0 | 2023 | |
| 26.1 | 2023 | |
| 24.8 | 2017 | |
| 4.0 | 2021 | |
| 2.9 | 2023 | |
| 7.0 | 2020 | |
| 62.0 | 2023 | |
| 26.2 | 2023 | |
| 12.3 | 2019 | |
| 93.8 | 2023 | |
| 1.7 | 2015 | |
| 6.6 | 2023 | |
| 1.3 | 2023 | |
| 4.1 | 2023 | |
| 11.8 | 2017 | |
| 29.7 | 2023 | |
| 3.3 | 2019 | |
| 38.5 | 2023 | |
| 19.2 | 2023 | |
| 101.7 | 2023 | |
| 7.6 | 2023 | |
| 0.1 | 2018 | |
| 1.8 | 2015 | |
| 1.9 | 2023 | |
| 2.4 | 2020 | |
| 9.7 | 2023 | |
| 1.3 | 2016 | |
| 1.9 | 2022 | |
| 83.2 | 2023 | |
| 0.5 | 2021 | |
| 0.0 | 2023 | |
| 30.7 | 2023 |
United States
[edit]

The U.S. Department of Justice's National Crime Victimization Survey states that on average there are 237,868 victims (age 12 or older) of sexual assault and rape each year. According to RAINN, every 107 seconds someone in America is sexually assaulted.[82] Sexual assault in the United States military also is a salient issue. Some researchers assert that the unique professional and socially-contained context of military service can heighten the destructive nature of sexual assault, and, therefore, improved support is needed for these victims.[83]
The victims of sexual assault:
Age
- 15% are under the age of 12
- 29% are age 12–17[82]
- 44% are under age 18
- 80% are under age 30
- 12–34 are the highest risk years[84]
By gender
A study from 2011 finds that
- 19.3% of women have been victims of attempted (7.8%) or completed (11.5%) rape during their lifetime.
- An estimated 1.7% of men have been victims of attempted or completed rape during their lifetime.
- Over 23 million women have been victims of attempted or completed rape during their lifetime.
- Almost two million men have been victims of attempted or completed rape during their lifetime.
- An estimated 7.6 million men have been forced to penetrate during their lifetime, 71% having done so before the age of 25.[85]
The National Crime Victimization Survey conducted by the U.S. Justice Department (Bureau of Justice Statistics) found that from 1995 to 2013, men represented 17% of victims of sexual assault and rape on college campuses, and 4% of non-campus sexual assaults and rapes.[86]
LGBT
LGBT identifying individuals, with the exception of lesbian women, are more likely to experience sexual assault on college campuses than heterosexual individuals.[87]
- 1 in 8 lesbian women and nearly 50% of bisexual women and men experience sexual assault in their lifetime.
- Nearly 4 in 10 gay men experience sexual violence in their lifetime.
- 64% of transgender people have experienced sexual assault in their lifetime.[88]
Effects
- 3 times more likely to suffer from depression
- 6 times more likely to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder
- 13 times more likely to abuse alcohol
- 26 times more likely to abuse drugs
- 4 times more likely to contemplate suicide[84]
On average 68% of sexual assaults are estimated to be unreported.[82] The conviction rate for violent sexual assault varies by location around 1-8%.[89] The clearance rate for sexual assault is lower than most violent crimes.[89]
- The assailants
According to the U.S. Department of Justice 1997 Sex Offenses and Offenders Study
- A rapist's age on average is 31 years old
- 52% of offenders are white
- 22% of rapists imprisoned report that they are married
- Juveniles accounted for 16% of forcible rape arrestees in 1995 and 17% of those arrested for other sex offenses
In 2001
- 11% of rapes involved the use of a weapon
- 3% used a gun
- 6% used a knife
- 2% used another form of weapon
- 84% of victims reported the use of physical force only[90]
According to the U.S. Department of Justice 2005 National Crime Victimization Study
- About 2/3 of rapes were committed by someone known to the victim
- 73% of sexual assaults were perpetrated by a non-stranger
- 38% of rapists are a friend or acquaintance
- 28% are an intimate partner
- 7% are a relative[90]
College
In the United States, several studies since 1987 have indicated that one in four college women have experienced rape or attempted rape at some point in their lifetime. These studies are based on anonymous surveys of college women, not reports to the police, and the results are disputed.[91]
In 2015, Texas A&M University professor Jason Lindo and his colleagues analyzed over two decades worth of FBI data, noting that reports of rape increased 15–57% around the times of major American football games at Division 1 schools while attempting to find a link between campus rape and alcohol.[92]
A 2006 report from the U.S. Department of Justice titled "The Sexual Victimization of College Women" reports that 3.1% of undergraduates survived rape or attempted rape during a 6–7 month academic year with an additional 10.1% surviving rape prior to college and an additional 10.9% surviving attempted rape prior to college. With no overlap between these groups, these percentages add to 24.1%, or "One in Four".[93][full citation needed]
Koss, Gidycz & Wisniewski published a study in 1987 where they interviewed approximately 6,000 college students on 32 college campuses nationwide. They asked several questions covering a wide range of behaviors. From this study 15% of college women answered "yes" to questions about whether they experienced something that met the definition of rape. An additional 12% of women answered "yes" to questions about whether they experienced something that met the definition of attempted rape, thus the statistic One in Four.[94]
A point of contention lies in the leading nature of the questions in the study conducted by Koss, Gidycz & Wisniewski. Koss herself later admitted that the question that had garnered the largest "rape" result was flawed and ultimately rendered the study invalid. Most prominently the problem was that many respondents who had answered yes to several questions had their responses treated as having been raped. The issue being that these same respondents did not feel they had been victimized and never sought redress for grievances. The resultant change shows a prevalence of only 1 in 22 college women having been raped or attempted to be raped during their time at college.[91]
In 1995, the CDC replicated part of this study, however they examined rape only, and did not look at attempted rape. They used a two-stage cluster sample design to produce a nationally representative sample of undergraduate college students aged greater than or equal to 18 years. The first-stage sampling frame contained 2,919 primary sampling units (PSUs), consisting of two- and four-year colleges and universities. The second sampling stage consisted of a random sample drawn from the primary sample unit frame enrolled in the 136 participating colleges and universities to increase the sample size to 4,609 undergraduate college students aged greater than or equal to 18 years old with a representative sample demographic matching the national demographic. Differential sampling rates of the PSU were used to ensure sufficient numbers of male and female, black and Hispanic students in the total sample population. After differential sample weighting, female students represented 55.5% of the sample; white students represented 72.8% of the sample, black students 10.3%, Hispanic students 7.1%, and 9.9% were other.[95] It was determined that nationwide, 13.1% of college students reported that they had been forced to have sexual intercourse against their will during their lifetime. Female students were significantly more likely than male students to report they had ever been forced to have sexual intercourse; 20% of approximately 2500 females (55% of 4,609 samples) and 3.9% of males reported experiencing rape thus far in the course of their lifetime.[96]
Other studies concerning the annual incidence of rape, some studies conclude an occurrence of 5%. The National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence found that in the 2013–2014 academic year, 4.6% of girls ages 14–17 experienced sexual assault or sexual abuse.[97] In another study, Mohler-Kuo, Dowdall, Koss & Weschler (2004)[98] found in a study of approximately 25,000 college women nationwide that 4.7% experienced rape or attempted rape during a single academic year. This study did not measure lifetime incidence of rape or attempted rape. Similarly, Kilpatrick, Resnick, Ruggiero, Conoscenti, & McCauley (2007) found in a study of 2,000 college women nationwide that 5.2% experienced rape every year.[99]
On campuses, it has been found that alcohol is a prevalent issue in regards to sexual assault. It has been estimated that 1 in 5 women experience an assault, and of those women, 50–75% have had either the attacker, the woman, or both, consume alcohol prior to the assault.[100] Not only has it been a factor in the rates of sexual assault on campus, but because of the prevalence, assaults are also being affected specifically by the inability to give consent when intoxicated and bystanders not knowing when to intervene due to their own intoxication or the intoxication of the victim.[100][101]
Children
Other research has found that about 80,000 American children are sexually abused each year.[102]
Estimates of prevalence
[edit]Total prevalence of sexual assault including unreported can be estimated with opinion polls. Below is shown the estimated percentage of population which stated to be a victim to sexual assault in the previous 12 months.[103]
| Country | Female | Male | Total | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | 4.8 | 2016 | |
| - | - | 1.0 | 2009 | |
| 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2009 | |
| 9.8 | - | - | 2011 | |
| 2.1 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 2019 | |
| 3.9 | - | - | 2008 | |
| 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2018 | |
| 4.2 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 2023 | |
| - | - | 2.0 | 2009 | |
| 2.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 2022 | |
| 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2022 | |
| 3.6 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 2020 | |
| - | - | 6.5 | 2010 | |
| 4.3 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 2006 | |
| 3.2 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 2023 | |
| 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2021 | |
| 4.2 | - | 2.4 | 2024 | |
| - | - | 0.1 | 2016 | |
| 1.2 | - | - | 2015 | |
| 9.1 | - | - | 2016 | |
| 2.1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2013 | |
| 2.2 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 2023 | |
| 3.1 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 2023 | |
| 3.2 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 2021 | |
| - | - | 2.3 | 2020 | |
| 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 2010 | |
| - | - | 1.7 | 2023 | |
| 1.6 | - | - | 2017 | |
| 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 2020 | |
| - | - | 0.1 | 2014 | |
| - | - | 0.5 | 2022 | |
| 6.3 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 2023 | |
| - | - | 1.0 | 2015 | |
| - | - | 0.6 | 2015 | |
| - | - | 0.2 | 2019 |
By jurisdiction
[edit]Australia
[edit]Within Australia, the term sexual assault is used to describe a variation of sexual offences. This is due to a variety of definitions and use of terminology to describe sexual offences within territories and states as each territory and state have their own legislation to define rape, attempted rape, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, sexual penetration or intercourse without consent and sexual violence.
In the State of New South Wales, sexual assault is a statutory offence punishable under s 61I of the Crimes Act 1900. The term "sexual assault" is equivalent to "rape" in ordinary parlance, while all other assaults of a sexual nature are termed "indecent assault".
To be liable for punishment under the Crimes Act 1900, an offender must intend to commit an act of sexual intercourse as defined under s 61H(1) while having one of the states of knowledge of non-consent defined under s 61HA(3). But s 61HA(3) is an objective standard which only require the person has no reasonable grounds for believing the other person is consenting.[104] The maximum penalty for sexual assault is 14 years imprisonment.[105]
Aggravated sexual assault is sexual intercourse with another person without the consent of the other person and in circumstances of aggravation. The maximum penalty is imprisonment for 20 years under s 61J of the Crimes Act.
In the state of Victoria, rape is punishable under s 38 of the Crimes Act 1958, with a maximum penalty of 25 years imprisonment.[106]
In the state of South Australia, rape is punishable under s 48 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) with a maximum term of life imprisonment.[107]
In the state of Western Australia, sexual penetration is punishable under s 325 the Criminal Code Act 1913 with a maximum sentence of 14 years imprisonment.[108]
In the Northern Territory, offences of sexual intercourse and gross indecency without consent are punishable under s 192 of the Criminal Code Act 1983 and punishable with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.[109]
In Queensland, rape and sexual assault are punishable under s 349, Chapter 32 of the Criminal Code Act 1899 with a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.[110]
In Tasmania, rape is punishable under s 185 of the Criminal Code Act 1924 with a maximum punishment of 21 years under s389 of the Criminal Code Act 1924.[111]
In the Australian Capital Territory, sexual assault is punishable under Part 3 of the Crimes Act 1900 with a maximum punishment of 17 years.[112]
Sexual assault is considered a gendered crime which results in 85% of sexual assaults never coming to the attention of the criminal justice system according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.[113] This is due to low reporting rates, treatment of victims and distrust of the criminal justice system, difficulty in obtaining evidence and the belief in sexual assault myths.[114]
However, once a person is charged, the public prosecutor will decide whether the case will proceed to trial based on whether there is sufficient evidence and whether a case is in the public interest.[115] Once the matter has reached trial, the matter will generally be heard in the District Court. This is because sexually violent crimes are mostly categorised as indictable offences (serious offences), as opposed to summary offences (minor offences). Sexual offences can also be heard in the Supreme Court, but more generally if the matter is being heard as an appeal.
Once the matter is being heard, the prosecution must provide evidence which proves "beyond reasonable doubt" that the offence was committed by the defendant. The standard of proof is vital in checking the power of the State.[116] While as previously stated that each jurisdiction (State and Territory) has its own sexual offence legislation, there are many common elements to any criminal offence that advise on how the offence is defined and what must be proven by the prosecution in order to find the defendant guilty.[116] These elements are known as Actus Reus which comprises the physical element (see Ryan v Regina [1967])[117] and the Mens Rea which comprises the mental element (see He Kaw Teh (1985)).[118]
Notable sexual assault cases which have resulted in convictions are Regina v Bilal Skaf [2005][119] and Regina v Mohommed Skaf [2005][120] which were highly visible in New South Wales within the media the 2000s. These cases were closely watched by the media and led to legislative changes such as the passing of the Crimes Amendment (Aggravated Sexual Assault in Company) Act 2001 No 62[121] which dramatically increased the sentences for 'gang rapists' by creating a new category of crime known as Aggravated Sexual Assault in Company. Changes were also made to the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.[122] This change is known as the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Victim Impact Statements) Act 2004 No 3[123] which expands the category of offences in respect of which a Local Court may receive and consider Victim Impact Statements to include some indictable offences which are usually dealt with summarily.
Canada
[edit]Sexual assault is defined as sexual contact with another person without that other person's consent. Consent is defined in section 273.1(1) as "the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question".
Section 265 of the Criminal Code defines the offences of assault and sexual assault.
Section 271 criminalizes "Sexual assault", section 272 criminalizes "Sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm" and section 273 criminalizes "Aggravated sexual assault".
Consent
[edit]The absence of consent defines the crime of sexual assault. Section 273.1 (1) defines consent, section 273.1 (2) outlines certain circumstances where "no consent" is obtained, while section 273.1 (3) states that subsection (2) does not limit the circumstances where "no consent" is obtained (i.e. subsection (2) describes some circumstances which deem the act to be non-consensual, but other circumstances, not described in this section, can also deem the act as having been committed without consent). "No consent" to sexual assault is also subject to Section 265 (3), which also outlines several situations where the act is deemed non-consensual. In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. J.A. interpreted the provisions below to find that a person must have an active mind during the sexual activity in order to consent, and that they cannot give consent in advance.[124][125]
- Meaning of "consent"
273.1 (1) Subject to subsection (2) and subsection 265(3), "consent" means, for the purposes of sections 271, 272 and 273, the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question.
Where no consent obtained
(2) No consent is obtained, for the purposes of sections 271, 272 and 273, where (a) the agreement is expressed by the words or conduct of a person other than the complainant; (b) the complainant is incapable of consenting to the activity; (c) the accused induces the complainant to engage in the activity by abusing a position of trust, power or authority; (d) the complainant expresses, by words or conduct, a lack of agreement to engage in the activity; or (e) the complainant, having consented to engage in sexual activity, expresses, by words or conduct, a lack of agreement to continue to engage in the activity.
Subsection (2) not limiting
(3) Nothing in subsection (2) shall be construed as limiting the circumstances in which no consent is obtained.
- Section 265(3)
Consent
(3) For the purposes of this section, no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of (a) the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant; (b) threats or fear of the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant; (c) fraud; or (d) the exercise of authority.
In accordance with 265 (4) an accused may use the defence that he or she believed that the complainant consented, but such a defence may be used only when "a judge, if satisfied that there is sufficient evidence and that, if believed by the jury, the evidence would constitute a defence, shall instruct the jury when reviewing all the evidence relating to the determination of the honesty of the accused's belief, to consider the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for that belief"; furthermore according to section 273.2(b) the accused must show that he or she took reasonable steps in order to ascertain the complainant's consent, also 273.2(a) states that if the accused's belief steams from self-induced intoxication, or recklessness or wilful blindness than such belief is not a defence.[124]
- 265 (4)
Accused's belief as to consent
(4) Where an accused alleges that he or she believed that the complainant consented to the conduct that is the subject-matter of the charge, a judge, if satisfied that there is sufficient evidence and that, if believed by the jury, the evidence would constitute a defence, shall instruct the jury, when reviewing all the evidence relating to the determination of the honesty of the accused's belief, to consider the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for that belief.
- Where belief in consent not a defence
273.2 It is not a defence to a charge under section 271, 272 or 273 that the accused believed that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge, where (a) the accused's belief arose from the accused's
(i) self-induced intoxication, or
(ii) recklessness or wilful blindness; or (b) the accused did not take reasonable steps, in the circumstances known to the accused at the time, to ascertain that the complainant was consenting.
Supreme Court partial interpretation of "consent"
[edit]The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador jury ruled in favour of a defense that added to the interpretation of the consent laws.[126] The defenses stated and the Jury was reminded by Justice Valerie Marshall:[127]
- because a complainant is drunk does not diminish their capacity to consent.
- because a complainant cannot remember if they gave consent does not mean they could not have consented.[128]
The coined phrase regarding this defense was "Moral vs. legal consent".[129]
Germany
[edit]Before 1997, the definition of rape (German: Vergewaltigung) was: "Whoever compels a woman to have extramarital intercourse with him, or with a third person, by force or the threat of present danger to life or limb, shall be punished by not less than two years' imprisonment."[130]
In 1997, a broader definition was adopted with the 13th criminal amendment, section 177–179, which deals with sexual abuse.[131][citation needed] Rape is generally reported to the police, although it is also allowed to be reported to the prosecutor or District Court.[131][citation needed]
As of 2025,[further explanation needed] the Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch) reads:[132]
Section 177
Sexual assault by use of force or threats; rape
- (1) Whoever, against a person's discernible will, performs sexual acts on that person or has that person perform sexual acts on them, or causes that person to perform or acquiesce to sexual acts being performed on or by a third person incurs a penalty of imprisonment for a term of between six months and five years.
- ...
- (6) In especially serious cases the penalty shall be imprisonment of not less than two years. An especially serious case typically occurs if
- the offender performs sexual intercourse with the victim or performs similar sexual acts with the victim, or allows them to be performed on himself by the victim, especially if they degrade the victim or if they entail penetration of the body (rape); or
- the offence is committed jointly by more than one person.
Subsection (2) defines situations where the victim was unable to consent or coerced as having the same penalty. The other subsections provide additional stipulations on sentencing depending on aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
Section 178 provides that "If, by committing sexual assault, sexual coercion or rape (section 177), the offender causes the victim's death at least recklessly, the penalty is imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of at least 10 years."
Republic of Ireland
[edit]As in many other jurisdictions, the term sexual assault is generally used to describe non-penetrative sexual offences. Section 2 of the Criminal Law (Rape) Act of 1981 states that a man has committed rape if he has sexual intercourse with a woman who at the time of the intercourse does not consent to it, and at that time he knows that she does not consent to the intercourse or he is reckless as to whether she does or does not consent to it. Under Section 4 of the Criminal Law (Rape Amendment) Act of 1990, rape means a sexual assault that includes penetration (however slight) of the anus or mouth by the penis or penetration (however slight) of the vagina by any object held or manipulated by another person. The maximum penalty for rape in Ireland is imprisonment for life.[133]
South Africa
[edit]The Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act replaced the common-law offence of indecent assault with a statutory offence of sexual assault, defined in section 5 of the act as follows.
(1) A person ('"A") who unlawfully and intentionally sexually violates a complainant ("B"), without the consent of B, is guilty of the offence of sexual assault.
(2) A person ("A") who unlawfully and intentionally inspires the belief in a complainant ("B") that B will be sexually violated, is guilty of the offence of sexual assault.
The act's definition of "sexual violation" incorporates a number of sexual acts, including genital contact short of penetration as well as any contact with the mouth designed to cause sexual arousal. Non-consensual acts that involve actual penetration are included in the separate offence of rape rather than sexual assault.
The Act also created the offences of "compelled sexual assault", when a person forces a second person to commit an act of sexual violation with a third person; and "compelled self-sexual assault", when a person forces another person to masturbate or commit various other sexual acts on theirself.[134]
Spain
[edit]In August 2022, Spain passed a revolutionary "only yes means yes" sexual consent law which expanded the legal definition of sexual assault in Spain to being also sexual-related conduct without consent and now required that consent must be affirmative and cannot be assumed to have been given by default or silence.[135][136] It also increased the nation's maximum rape sentence to 15 years, in tandem with 15-year sentences that were handed to perpetrators in the nation's 2016 wolf pack gang rape case.[137][136] However, it did receive some criticism for the way it enacted sentencing reductions for some offenders.[138][136] The law went into effect in October 2022.[138] It was later amended in April 2023 to close loopholes which contributed to the sentence reduction controversy.[138]
United Kingdom
[edit]England and Wales
[edit]Sexual assault is a statutory offence in England and Wales. It is created by section 3 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which defines "sexual assault" as when a person (A)
- intentionally touches another person (B),
- the touching is sexual,
- B does not consent to the touching, and
- A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.
A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
- on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both;
- on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.[139]
Offences committed before the 2003 Act came into force are prosecuted under the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (or in theory earlier legislation), in particular indecent assault.
Consent
[edit]Section 74 of the Sexual Offenses Act explains that "a person consents if he agrees by choice and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice".
Section 75 provides a rebuttable presumption that there was no consent in case of violence, intimidation, unlawful imprisonment, unconsciousness, or physical disability or drugs that impair the ability to give consent.
Northern Ireland
[edit]Sexual assault is a statutory offence. It is created by article 7 of the Sexual Offences (Northern Ireland) Order 2008. Sexual assault is defined as follows:[140]
- Sexual assault
- (1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
- (a) he intentionally touches another person (B),
- (b) the touching is sexual,
- (c) B does not consent to the touching, and
- (d) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
Scotland
[edit]Sexual assault is a statutory offence. It is created by section 3 of the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009. Sexual assault is defined as follows:[141]
- Sexual assault
- (1) If a person ("A")—
- (a) without another person ("B") consenting, and
- (b) without any reasonable belief that B consents,
- does any of the things mentioned in subsection (2), then A commits an offence, to be known as the offence of sexual assault.
- (2) Those things are, that A—
- (a) penetrates sexually, by any means and to any extent, either intending to do so or reckless as to whether there is penetration, the vagina, anus or mouth of B,
- (b) intentionally or recklessly touches B sexually,
- (c) engages in any other form of sexual activity in which A, intentionally or recklessly, has physical contact (whether bodily contact or contact by means of an implement and whether or not through clothing) with B,
- (d) intentionally or recklessly ejaculates semen onto B,
- (e) intentionally or recklessly emits urine or saliva onto B sexually.
United States
[edit]The United States Department of Justice defines sexual assault as "any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient. Falling under the definition of sexual assault are sexual activities as forced sexual intercourse, forcible sodomy, child molestation, incest, fondling, and attempted rape."[142]
Every U.S. state has its own code of laws, and thus the definition of conduct that constitutes a crime, including a sexual assault, may vary to some degree by state.[143][144] Some states may refer to sexual assault as "sexual battery" or "criminal sexual conduct".
Texas
[edit]The Texas Penal Code, Sec. 22.011(a)[145] defines sexual assault as
A person commits [sexual assault] if the person:
- (1) intentionally or knowingly:
- (A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent;
- (B) causes the penetration of the mouth of another person by the sexual organ of the actor, without that person's consent; or
- (C) causes the sexual organ of another person, without that person's consent, to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor; or
- (2) intentionally or knowingly:
- (A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of a child by any means;
- (B) causes the penetration of the mouth of a child by the sexual organ of the actor;
- (C) causes the sexual organ of a child to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor;
- (D) causes the anus of a child to contact the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor; or
- (E) causes the mouth of a child to contact the anus or sexual organ of another person, including the actor.
See also
[edit]- Abuse
- List of the causes of genital pain
- #MeToo
- National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children
- Patient abuse
- Post-assault treatment of sexual assault victims
- R v Collins
- Raelyn Campbell
- Rape kit
- Rape paralysis
- Sexual assault in the U.S. military
- Sexual assault of migrants from Latin America to the United States
- Sexual violence
- Statutory rape
References
[edit]- ^ a b Peter Cameron; George Jelinek; Anne-Maree Kelly; Anthony F. T. Brown; Mark Little (2011). Textbook of Adult Emergency Medicine E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 658. ISBN 978-0702049316. Retrieved 30 December 2017.
- ^ "Sexual Assault Fact Sheet". Office on Women's Health. Department of Health & Human Services. 30 December 2022. Retrieved 11 May 2023.
- ^ Assault, Black's Law Dictionary, 8th Edition. See also Ibbs v The Queen, High Court of Australia, 61 ALJR 525, 1987 WL 714908 (sexual assault defined as sexual penetration without consent); Sexual Offences Act 2003 Chapter 42 s 3 Sexual assault (United Kingdom), (sexual assault defined as sexual contact without consent), and Chase v. R. 1987 CarswellNB 25 (Supreme Court of Canada) (sexual assault defined as force without consent of a sexual nature)
- ^ a b "Sexual Assault". Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. Retrieved 11 May 2019.
- ^ "The National Center for Victims of Crime – Library/Document Viewer". Ncvc.org. Archived from the original on 20 July 2012. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
- ^ Huff, Mary (Fall 2009). "The "New" Withdrawal of Consent Standard in Maryland Rape Law: A Year After Baby v. State". The Modern American. 5 (2): 14. Retrieved 16 July 2024.
- ^ Cunliffe, Emma (2012). "Sexual Assault Cases in the Supreme Court of Canada: Losing Sight of Substantive Equality?". Supreme Court Law Review. SSRN 2111652. Retrieved 21 July 2024.
- ^ a b "Child Sexual Abuse". Medline Plus. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2 April 2008. Archived from the original on 5 December 2013.
- ^ "Guidelines for psychological evaluations in child protection matters". American Psychologist. 54 (8): 586–93. 1999. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.586. PMID 10453704.
Abuse, sexual (child): generally defined as contacts between a child and an adult or other person significantly older or in a position of power or control over the child, where the child is being used for sexual stimulation of the adult or other person
- ^ Martin, Judy; Anderson, Jessie; Romans, Sarah; Mullen, Paul; O'Shea, Martine (1993). "Asking about child sexual abuse: Methodological implications of a two stage survey". Child Abuse & Neglect. 17 (3): 383–92. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(93)90061-9. PMID 8330225.
- ^ "Child sexual abuse definition from". the NSPCC. Archived from the original on 7 February 2012. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
- ^ Brown, Rick; Napier, Sarah; Smith, Russell G (2020), Australians who view live streaming of child sexual abuse: An analysis of financial transactions, Australian Institute of Criminology, ISBN 9781925304336 pp. 1–4.
- ^ Roosa, MW; Reinholtz, C; Angelini, PJ (1999). "The relation of child sexual abuse and depression in young women: Comparisons across four ethnic groups". Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 27 (1): 65–76. PMID 10197407.
- ^ Widom, CS (1999). "Posttraumatic stress disorder in abused and neglected children grown up". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 156 (8): 1223–9. doi:10.1176/ajp.156.8.1223. PMID 10450264. S2CID 7339542.
- ^ Levitan, Robert D.; Rector, Neil A.; Sheldon, Tess; Goering, Paula (2003). "Childhood adversities associated with major depression and/or anxiety disorders in a community sample of Ontario: Issues of co-morbidity and specificity". Depression and Anxiety. 17 (1): 34–42. doi:10.1002/da.10077. PMID 12577276. S2CID 26031006.
- ^ Messman-Moore, T. L.; Long, P. J. (2000). "Child Sexual Abuse and Revictimization in the Form of Adult Sexual Abuse, Adult Physical Abuse, and Adult Psychological Maltreatment". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 15 (5): 489–502. doi:10.1177/088626000015005003. S2CID 145761598.
- ^ Teitelman AM, Bellamy SL, Jemmott JB 3rd, Icard L, O'Leary A, Ali S, Ngwane Z, Makiwane M. Childhood sexual abuse and sociodemographic factors prospectively associated with intimate partner violence perpetration among South African heterosexual men. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2017;51(2):170-178
- ^ Dinwiddie, S.; Heath, A. C.; Dunne, M. P.; Bucholz, K. K.; Madden, P. A. F.; Slutske, W. S.; Bierut, L. J.; Statham, D. B.; Martin, N. G. (2000). "Early sexual abuse and lifetime psychopathology: A co-twin–control study". Psychological Medicine. 30 (1): 41–52. doi:10.1017/S0033291799001373. PMID 10722174. S2CID 15270464.
- ^ "Sexual assault has lasting effects on teenagers' mental health and education". NIHR Evidence. 23 September 2022. doi:10.3310/nihrevidence_53533. S2CID 252516636.
- ^ Clarke, Venetia; Goddard, Andrea; Wellings, Kaye; Hirve, Raeena; Casanovas, Marta; Bewley, Susan; Viner, Russell; Kramer, Tami; Khadr, Sophie (9 August 2021). "Medium-term health and social outcomes in adolescents following sexual assault: a prospective mixed-methods cohort study". Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 58 (12): 1777–1793. doi:10.1007/s00127-021-02127-4. ISSN 0933-7954. PMC 10627884. PMID 34370051. S2CID 236953714.
- ^ a b c Courtois, Christine A. (1988). Healing the Incest Wound: Adult Survivors in Therapy. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 208. ISBN 978-0-393-31356-7.
- ^ a b Julia Whealin (22 May 2007). "Child Sexual Abuse". National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, US Department of Veterans Affairs. Archived from the original on 30 July 2009.
- ^ David Finkelhor (Summer–Fall 1994). "Current Information on the Scope and Nature of Child Sexual Abuse" (PDF). The Future of Children. (1994) 4(2): 31–53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2008.
- ^ "Crimes against Children Research Center". Unh.edu. Archived from the original on 23 August 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
- ^ "Family Research Laboratory". Unh.edu. Archived from the original on 26 November 2011. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
- ^ Gorey, Kevin M.; Leslie, Donald R. (1997). "The prevalence of child sexual abuse: Integrative review adjustment for potential response and measurement biases". Child Abuse & Neglect. 21 (4): 391–8. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.465.1057. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00180-9. PMID 9134267.
- ^ a b "Adult Manifestations of Childhood Sexual Abuse". www.aaets.org. American Academy of Experts in Traumatic Stress. Archived from the original on 3 April 2018. Retrieved 28 December 2018.
- ^ a b c "About Sexual Violence". Pcar.org. Archived from the original on 20 October 2014. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- ^ "2010 Georgia Code :: TITLE 16 - CRIMES AND OFFENSES :: CHAPTER 6 - SEXUAL OFFENSES :: § 16-6-5.1 - Sexual assault by persons with supervisory or disciplinary authority; sexual assault by practitioner of psychotherapy against patient; consent not a defense; penalty upon conviction for sexual assault". Justia Law. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
- ^ "Sexual Violence". Archived from the original on 2 April 2015.
- ^ a b "Resources | Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape (PCAR)". Archived from the original on 19 October 2014.
- ^ Jackson, Shelly L. (16 October 2014). "All Elder Abuse Perpetrators Are Not Alike". International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 60 (3). SAGE Publications: 265–285. doi:10.1177/0306624x14554063. ISSN 0306-624X. PMID 25326465. S2CID 30460280.
- ^ Roberts, Albert R.; Ann Wolbert Bergess; CHERYL REGEHR (2009). Victimology: Theories and Applications. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 228. ISBN 978-0-7637-7210-9.
- ^ Krantz, G.; Garcia-Moreno, C (2005). "Violence against women". Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 59 (10): 818–21. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.022756. PMC 1732916. PMID 16166351.
- ^ "Sapphire". Metropolitan Police Service. Archived from the original on 6 December 2012. Retrieved 18 January 2010.
- ^ Abbey, Antonia; Beshears, Renee; Clinton-Sherrod, A. Monique; McAuslan, Pam (2004). "Similarities and Differences in Women's Sexual Assault Experiences Based on Tactics Used by the Perpetrator". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 28 (4): 323–32. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00149.x. PMC 4527559. PMID 26257466.
- ^ Kaufman, A; Divasto, P; Jackson, R; Voorhees, D; Christy, J (1980). "Male rape victims: Noninstitutionalized assault". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 137 (2): 221–3. doi:10.1176/ajp.137.2.221. PMID 7352580.
- ^ Tjaden, Patricia (2000). "Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey" (PDF). National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- ^ Tjaden, Patricia; Thoennes, Nancy. "Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey Control and Prevention" (PDF). National Criminal Justice Reference Service. National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 28 December 2018.
rape is a crime committed primarily against youth: 18 percent of women surveyed said they experienced a completed or attempted rape at some time in their life and 0.3 percent said they experienced a completed or attempted rape in the previous 12 months. Of the women who reported being raped at some time in their lives, 22 percent were under 12 years old and 32 percent were 12 to 17 years old when they were first raped.
- ^ YING HUI TAN, Barrister (12 January 1993). "Law Report: Attempted rape came within definition of 'sexual offence': Regina v Robinson – Court of Appeal (Criminal Divisional) (Lord Taylor of Gosforth, Lord Chief Justice, Mr Justice Potts and Mr Justice Judge), 27 November 1992". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 21 February 2010. Retrieved 27 October 2010.
- ^ The Age, 3 June 2019, One in three women victim to 'stealth' condom removal
- ^ Paludi, Michele Antoinette; Barickman (1991). Academic and Workplace Sexual Harassment. SUNY Press. pp. 2–5. ISBN 978-0-7914-0829-2.
- ^ Dziech et al. 1990, Boland 2002
- ^ "Facts About Sexual Harassment". U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 27 June 2002. Archived from the original on 11 July 2017. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
- ^ a b c d Dworkin, Emily R.; Menon, Suvarna V.; Bystrynski, Jonathan; Allen, Nicole E. (1 August 2017). "Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: A review and meta-analysis". Clinical Psychology Review. 56: 65–81. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.002. ISSN 0272-7358. PMC 5576571. PMID 28689071.
- ^ Kennedy KM, Heterogeneity of existing research relating to sexual violence, sexual assault and rape precludes meta-analysis of injury data. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. (2013), 20(5):447–459
- ^ Kennedy KM, The relationship of victim injury to the progression of sexual crimes through the criminal justice system, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2012:19(6):309-311
- ^ Mandi, Dupain (2014). "Developing and Implementing a Sexual Assault Violence Prevention and Awareness Campaign at a State-Supported Regional University". American Journal of Health Studies. 29 (4): 264.
- ^ Miller, Ted R; Cohen, Mark A; Weirsema, Brian (1996). "Victim Costs and Consequences: A New Look" (PDF). National Institute of Justice. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 May 2016. Retrieved 1 September 2016.
- ^ Tjaden & Thoennes (2006). "Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Rape Victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey". National Institute of Justice. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Archived from the original on 16 September 2016. Retrieved 1 September 2016.
- ^ Byrne, Christina A.; Resnick, Heidi S.; Kilpatrick, Dean G.; Best, Connie L.; Saunders, Benjamin E. (1999). "The socioeconomic impact of interpersonal violence on women". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 67 (3): 362–366. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.67.3.362. PMID 10369056.
- ^ Chrisler, Joan C.; Ferguson, Sheila (1 November 2006). "Violence against Women as a Public Health Issue". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1087 (1): 235–249. Bibcode:2006NYASA1087..235C. doi:10.1196/annals.1385.009. ISSN 1749-6632. PMID 17189508. S2CID 41330781.
- ^ Loya, Rebecca M. (1 October 2015). "Rape as an Economic Crime The Impact of Sexual Violence on Survivors' Employment and Economic Well-Being". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 30 (16): 2793–2813. doi:10.1177/0886260514554291. ISSN 0886-2605. PMID 25381269. S2CID 25732109.
- ^ Wang, C., & Wein, L. M. (2018). Analyzing Approaches to the Backlog of Untested Sexual Assault Kits in the U.S.A. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 63(4), 1110-1121.doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13739
- ^ a b c d Varcarolis, Elizabeth (2013). Essentials of psychiatric mental health nursing. St. Louis: Elsevier. pp. 439–442.
- ^ Posmontier, B; Dovydaitis, T; Lipman, K (2010). "Sexual violence: psychiatric healing with eye movement reprocessing and desensitization". Health Care for Women International. 31 (8): 755–68. doi:10.1080/07399331003725523. PMC 3125707. PMID 20623397.
- ^ Schiff, M; Nacasch, N; Levit, S; Katz, N; Foa, EB (2015). "Prolonged exposure for treating PTSD among female methadone patients who were survivors of sexual abuse in Israel". Social Work & Health Care. 54 (8): 687–707. doi:10.1080/00981389.2015.1058311. PMID 26399489. S2CID 9288531.
- ^ Relyea, M.; Ullman, S. E. (2013). "Unsupported or Turned Against". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 39 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1177/0361684313512610. PMC 4349407. PMID 25750475.
- ^ Fallik, Seth; Wells, William (2015). "Testing Previously Unsubmitted Sexual Assault Kits: What Are the Investigative Results?". Criminal Justice Policy Review. 26 (6): 598–619. doi:10.1177/0887403414528001.
- ^ Smothers, Melissa Kraemer; Smothers, D. Brian (2011). "A Sexual Assault Primary Prevention Model with Diverse Urban Youth". Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 20 (6): 708–27. doi:10.1080/10538712.2011.622355. PMID 22126112. S2CID 20570694.
- ^ a b c Foubert, John D. (2000). "The Longitudinal Effects of a Rape-prevention Program on Fraternity Men's Attitudes, Behavioral Intent, and Behavior". Journal of American College Health. 48 (4): 158–63. doi:10.1080/07448480009595691. PMID 10650733. S2CID 38521575.
- ^ Vladutiu, C. J.; Martin, S. L.; Macy, R. J. (2010). "College- or University-Based Sexual Assault Prevention Programs: A Review of Program Outcomes, Characteristics, and Recommendations". Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 12 (2): 67–86. doi:10.1177/1524838010390708. PMID 21196436. S2CID 32144826.
- ^ Yeater, E; O'Donohue, W (1999). "Sexual assault prevention programs Current issues, future directions, and the potential efficacy of interventions with women". Clinical Psychology Review. 19 (7): 739–71. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.404.3130. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00075-0. PMID 10520434.
- ^ Garrity, Stacy E. (2011). "Sexual assault prevention programs for college-aged men: A critical evaluation". Journal of Forensic Nursing. 7 (1): 40–8. doi:10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01094.x. PMID 21348933. S2CID 39471249.
- ^ Thomas, KA; Sorenson, SB; Joshi, M (2016). ""Consent is good, joyous, sexy": A banner campaign to market consent to college students". Journal of American College Health. 64 (8): 639–650. doi:10.1080/07448481.2016.1217869. PMID 27471816. S2CID 3816453.
- ^ Foubert, John (2011). The Men's and Women's Programs: Ending Rape Through Peer Education. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-88105-0.[page needed]
- ^ Foubert, John D.; Newberry, Johnathan T; Tatum, Jerry (2008). "Behavior Differences Seven Months Later: Effects of a Rape Prevention Program". Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice. 44 (4): 728–749. doi:10.2202/1949-6605.1866. S2CID 219289954.
- ^ Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J.; Foubert, J. D.; Brasfield, H. M.; Hill, B.; Shelley-Tremblay, S. (2011). "The Men's Program: Does It Impact College Men's Self-Reported Bystander Efficacy and Willingness to Intervene?". Violence Against Women. 17 (6): 743–59. doi:10.1177/1077801211409728. PMID 21571743. S2CID 40387531.
- ^ Foubert, J. D.; Godin, E. E.; Tatum, J. L. (2009). "In Their Own Words: Sophomore College Men Describe Attitude and Behavior Changes Resulting from a Rape Prevention Program 2 Years After Their Participation". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 25 (12): 2237–57. doi:10.1177/0886260509354881. PMID 20040715. S2CID 7505859.
- ^ Foubert, John D.; Cremedy, Brandynne J. (2007). "Reactions of Men of Color to a Commonly Used Rape Prevention Program: Attitude and Predicted Behavior Changes". Sex Roles. 57 (1–2): 137–44. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9216-2. S2CID 55694984.
- ^ Banyard, Moynihan & Plante, 2007[full citation needed]
- ^ Banyard, Plante & Moynihan, 2004[full citation needed]
- ^ Banyard, Ward, Cohn, Plante, Moorhead, & Walsh, 2007[full citation needed]
- ^ Cissner, 2009[full citation needed]
- ^ Coker, Cook-Craig, Williams, Fisher, Clear, Garcia & Hegge, 2011[full citation needed]
- ^ "Edmonton Sexual Assault Awareness Campaign: 'Don't Be That Guy' So Effective City Relaunches With New Posters (PHOTOS)". Huffingtonpost.ca. December 2012. Archived from the original on 2 September 2016. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- ^ Abbott, Katy (20 September 2014). "White House announces college-campus sexual assault awareness campaign". Reuters. Archived from the original on 21 September 2014. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
- ^ Campbell, R., Pierce, S. J., Sharma, D. B., Feeney, H., & Fehler-Cabral, G. (2016). Developing Empirically Informed Policies for Sexual Assault Kit DNA Testing: Is It Too Late to Test Kits Beyond the Statute of Limitations? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(1), 3-27. doi:10.1177/0887403416638507
- ^ The Eighth United Nations Survey on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (2001–2002) Archived 21 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine – Table 02.08 Total recorded rapes, Unodc.org
- ^ a b "United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, crime-violent-offences". Retrieved 13 August 2025.
- ^ "Data UNODC - Metadata Information, Violent and Sexual Crime" (PDF). Retrieved 13 August 2025.
- ^ a b c "Statistics | RAINN | Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network". rainn.org. Archived from the original on 20 November 2015. Retrieved 18 November 2015.
- ^ Dichter ME, Wagner C, True G. Women veterans' experiences of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual assault in the context of military service: implications for supporting women's health and well-being. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2016 Sep 20. [Epub ahead of print]
- ^ a b "Who are the Victims? - RAINN - Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network". Rainn.org. Archived from the original on 6 June 2016. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- ^ "Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization — National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
- ^ "Survey: 20 Percent of Female College Student Victims Report Sexual Assault to Police". WBUR News. 11 December 2014. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
- ^ Fedina, Lisa; Holmes, Jennifer Lynne; Backes, Bethany L. (2016). "Campus Sexual Assault: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Research From 2000 to 2015". Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 19 (1): 76–93. doi:10.1177/1524838016631129. PMID 26906086. S2CID 1224327.
- ^ "College Student Health Survey Report: 2007–2011" (PDF). Bhs.umn.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 October 2016. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- ^ a b Walinchus, Lucia; Smyser, Katy; Murphy, Joe (10 January 2025). "Less than 4% of sex crimes end in conviction, NBC News investigation shows". NBC News. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
- ^ a b "The Offenders". RAINN - Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network. Archived from the original on 28 May 2016. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- ^ a b "Researching the 'Rape Culture' of America". Archived from the original on 30 October 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2012.
- ^ Paquette, Danielle. "The disturbing truth about college football and rape". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 25 August 2016.
- ^ Fisher, Cullen & Turner, 2006
- ^ Koss, Mary P.; Gidycz, Christine A.; Wisniewski, Nadine (1987). "The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 55 (2): 162–70. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162. PMID 3494755. S2CID 2814727.
- ^ "Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance: National College Health Risk Behavior Survey—United States, 1995". Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 14 November 1997. Archived from the original on 19 June 2017.
- ^ Douglas, Kathy A.; Collins, Janet L.; Warren, Charles; Kann, Laura; Gold, Robert; Clayton, Sonia; Ross, James G.; Kolbe, Lloyd J. (1997). "Results from the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey". Journal of American College Health. 46 (2): 55–66. doi:10.1080/07448489709595589. PMID 9276349.
- ^ Finkelhor, David (June 2015). "Prevalence of Childhood Exposure to Violence, Crime, and Abuse: Results From the National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence". JAMA Pediatrics. 169 (8): 746–54. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0676. PMID 26121291.
- ^ Mohler-Kuo, M; Dowdall, GW; Koss, MP; Wechsler, H (2004). "Correlates of rape while intoxicated in a national sample of college women". Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 65 (1): 37–45. doi:10.15288/jsa.2004.65.37. PMID 15000502.
- ^ Kilpatrick, Dean; Resnick, Heidi; Ruggiero, Kenneth; Conoscenti, Lauren M.; McCauley, Jenna (July 2007). Drug Facilitated, Incapacitated, and Forcible Rape: A National Study. U.S. Department of Justice. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 22 November 2013.[page needed]
- ^ a b Pugh, Brandie; Ningard, Holly; Ven, Thomas Vander; Butler, Leah (2016). "Victim Ambiguity: Bystander Intervention and Sexual Assault in the College Drinking Scene". Deviant Behavior. 37 (4): 401–418. doi:10.1080/01639625.2015.1026777. S2CID 147081204.
- ^ Pugh, Brandie; Becker, Patricia (2 August 2018). "Exploring Definitions and Prevalence of Verbal Sexual Coercion and Its Relationship to Consent to Unwanted Sex: Implications for Affirmative Consent Standards on College Campuses". Behavioral Sciences. 8 (8): 69. doi:10.3390/bs8080069. ISSN 2076-328X. PMC 6115968. PMID 30072605.
- ^ Bonnar-Kidd, Kelly K. (2010). "Sexual Offender Laws and Prevention of Sexual Violence or Recidivism". American Journal of Public Health. 100 (3): 412–9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.153254. PMC 2820068. PMID 20075329.
- ^ "United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, dp-sdg-16-1-3, Prevalence rate of sexual assault (%)". dataUNODC. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
- ^ See Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 61 HA (3)
- ^ s 61H(1) Crimes Act 1990
- ^ Crimes Act 1958 (VIC)
- ^ Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA).
- ^ Criminal Code Act 1913 (WA)
- ^ Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT)
- ^ Criminal Code Act 1899 (QLD)
- ^ Criminal Code 1924 (TAS)
- ^ Crimes Act 1900 (ACT)
- ^ Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2005). Personal Safety Survey. Canberra: ABS
- ^ Heath, M. (2005). The law and sexual offences against adults in Australia (Issues No. 4). Melbourne: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault
- ^ Lievore, D. (2005). Prosecutorial decisions in adult sexual assault cases. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 291, January. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology
- ^ a b "Sexual assault laws in Australia". 27 February 2011. Archived from the original on 6 March 2017. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
- ^ Ryan v R [1967] HCA 2; 121 CLR 205
- ^ He Kaw Teh v R (1985) 157 CLR 523
- ^ R v Bilal Skaf [2005] NSWCCA 297,16 September 2005
- ^ R v Mohommed Skaf [2005] NSWCCA 298, 16 September 2005
- ^ Crimes Amendment (Aggravated Sexual Assault in Company) Act 2001 No 62
- ^ Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 NSW
- ^ Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Victim Impact Statements) Act 2004 No 3
- ^ a b "Criminal Code". Laws.justice.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 9 November 2011. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
- ^ Mike Blanchfield (27 May 2011). "Woman can't consent to sex while unconscious, Supreme Court rules". The Toronto Star. Archived from the original on 12 June 2013. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
- ^ Barry, Garrett; Boone, Marilyn (24 February 2017). "Protest follows not guilty verdict in RNC officer Doug Snelgrove sexual assault trial". CBC News. CBC News. Archived from the original on 4 March 2017. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
Demonstration held on court steps following verdict
- ^ Mullaley, Rosie (23 February 2017). "Case of police officer accused of sexual assault in jury's hands". The Telegram. Archived from the original on 23 February 2017. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
- ^ "Here's why the issue of consent is not so clear in sexual assault cases". The Canadian Press. Global News. 3 March 2017. Archived from the original on 3 March 2017. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
- ^ "'Consent is a very complex issue': Lawyer looks at Snelgrove sexual assault trial". CBC News. Canada: Yahoo!. 25 February 2017. Archived from the original on 4 March 2017. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
- ^ "Kunarac, Vukovic and Kovac - Judgement - Part IV". Icty.org. Archived from the original on 12 March 2016. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- ^ a b Bottke, Wilfried (1999). "Sexuality and Crime: The Victims of Sexual Offenses". Buffalo Criminal Law Review. 3 (1): 293–315. doi:10.1525/nclr.1999.3.1.293. JSTOR 10.1525/nclr.1999.3.1.293.
- ^ "German Criminal Code". Gesetze-im-internet.de. Archived from the original on 15 November 2012. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- ^ National SATU Guidelines Development Group. Rape/Sexual Assault: National Guidelines on Referral and Forensic Clinical Examination in Ireland. 3rd Edition; 2014. Available at www.hse.ie/satu
- ^ "Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, as amended" (PDF). Department of Justice. Retrieved 4 February 2021.
- ^ Burgen, Stephen (25 August 2023). "Spain passes 'only yes means yes' sexual consent law". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 December 2023.
- ^ a b c ""Solo sí es sí": en qué consiste la nueva y polémica ley de consentimiento sexual en España". BBC News Mundo. 26 August 2023. Retrieved 20 December 2023.
- ^ "Judge hears 8 witnesses in Dani Alves sexual assault case". Associated Press. 3 February 2023. Retrieved 20 December 2023.
- ^ a b c Henley, Jon (16 April 2022). "Spanish PM apologises for loophole in new sexual consent law". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 December 2023.
- ^ "Sexual Offences Act 2003". Legislation.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 15 October 2016. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- ^ "The Sexual Offences (Northern Ireland) Order 2008". Legislation.gov.uk. 26 May 2011. Archived from the original on 14 November 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2011.
- ^ "Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009". Legislation.gov.uk. 26 May 2011. Archived from the original on 29 July 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2011.
- ^ "Sexual Assault". United States Department of Justice. 23 July 2014. Archived from the original on 10 October 2016. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
- ^ "State Law Report Generator". RAINN. Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. Archived from the original on 14 September 2017. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
- ^ Scheb, John M.; Scheb II, John M. (2008). Criminal Law (5 ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 20. ISBN 978-0495504801. Archived from the original on 6 November 2017.
- ^ "PENAL CODE CHAPTER 22. ASSAULTIVE OFFENSES". Statutes.legis.state.tx.us. Archived from the original on 10 August 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2011.
Further reading
[edit]- Gabriella Nilsson, Lena Karlsson, Monika Edgren, Ulrika Andersson, eds. (2019). Rape Narratives in Motion. Germany: Springer International Publishing.
- Wishart, Guy (2003). "The Sexual Abuse of People with Learning Difficulties: Do We Need a Social Model Approach to Vulnerability?". The Journal of Adult Protection. 5 (3): 14–27. doi:10.1108/14668203200300021.
Sexual assault
View on GrokipediaDefinitions and Conceptual Frameworks
Legal Definitions and Variations
Sexual assault is legally defined in most jurisdictions as any intentional sexual touching or act performed on another person without their consent, encompassing a range of behaviors from unwanted contact to more severe violations, though precise elements such as the requirement for penetration, force, or incapacity differ.[9][10] Consent is generally understood as voluntary agreement, with lack of verbal or physical resistance not implying acquiescence; for instance, federal U.S. military law under 10 U.S.C. § 920 specifies that an expression of lack of consent through words or conduct negates consent, regardless of resistance.[2] In the United States, federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 2242 defines sexual abuse as knowingly engaging in a sexual act with another without consent, including through coercion or when the victim is incapable due to mental or physical conditions, rendering sexual assault primarily a federal matter in cases involving interstate commerce, federal lands, or military personnel but otherwise prosecuted under state statutes that vary widely.[11][12] State definitions often include non-penetrative acts like fondling or forcing sexual acts, with examples such as Illinois law requiring an act of sexual penetration accompanied by force or threat for criminal sexual assault classification.[13] Across states, terminology and scope diverge, with some reserving "rape" for penetrative offenses and using "sexual assault" for broader unwanted contact, while others consolidate under assault with graded penalties based on victim age or injury.[14][10] In the United Kingdom, the Sexual Offences Act 2003 delineates sexual assault under Section 3 as intentional touching of another person in a sexual manner without consent, where consent means free agreement and capacity to choose, applicable regardless of the perpetrator's or victim's gender.[15][16] This framework distinguishes it from rape (Section 1, penile penetration) and assault by penetration (Section 2), emphasizing intentionality and lack of reasonable belief in consent, with broader sections covering causing sexual activity without consent.[15][17] Internationally, definitions exhibit significant variations, particularly regarding marital rape, age of consent, and consent standards; as of recent assessments, marital rape remains non-criminalized or exempted in several countries, including parts of India and certain Islamic jurisdictions where spousal consent is presumed, contrasting with widespread criminalization elsewhere since the late 20th century.[18] Age of consent thresholds range from 14 in some European nations to 18 in others, with reforms like Japan's 2023 Penal Code amendment elevating it to 16 and expanding rape to include non-penetrative acts by any body part or object.[19] Some systems, such as Australia's, incorporate affirmative consent models requiring explicit agreement, while others rely on absence of refusal, highlighting ongoing debates over evidentiary burdens and cultural influences on legal thresholds.[20]Behavioral and Psychological Criteria
Sexual assault encompasses behaviors involving unwanted sexual contact or activity imposed through physical force, psychological coercion, manipulation, intimidation, threats of retaliation, emotional pressure, or the administration of drugs or alcohol to impair the victim's capacity to resist or consent.[21][22] These acts range along a continuum from verbal coercion to penetrative contact, prioritizing the perpetrator's power and control over the victim's autonomy rather than solely physical violence.[10] Empirical data indicate that such behaviors often occur between acquaintances, with perpetrators exploiting relational dynamics to override explicit refusal or incapacity.[21] Psychologically, a core criterion is the absence of freely given, explicit, and voluntary consent, which requires the victim to possess sufficient cognitive capacity to understand the nature of the act, communicate agreement, and withdraw it at any point without duress.[23] Incapacity arises from factors such as intoxication, mental disability, unconsciousness, or developmental immaturity, rendering the individual unable to appraise risks or form intent, as assessed through clinical evaluations of comprehension and decision-making autonomy.[24][25] In forensic contexts, psychologists evaluate victims' competency to consent retrospectively by examining mental state at the time, including vulnerability to manipulation or impaired judgment, often finding that severe impairment equates to legal and psychological non-consent even without administered substances.[26][27] Perpetrator behaviors reflect intentional disregard for these consent boundaries, frequently reinforced through operant conditioning where sexual gratification sustains deviant patterns absent punishment.[28] Studies operationalize sexual assault empirically as contact violating substantive equality in autonomy, correlating with heightened psychopathology in victims, including distress from perceived betrayal in trusted relationships.[29][29] This framework distinguishes assault from consensual acts by emphasizing causal violations of volition, rather than post-hoc subjective interpretations.[30]Evolutionary and Biological Underpinnings
Sexual coercion, including rape, manifests across numerous animal species, particularly those exhibiting sexual dimorphism and polygynous mating systems, where males compete intensely for reproductive access due to anisogamy—the disparity in gamete investment between sexes leading to higher male variance in reproductive success.[31] In humans, evolutionary psychologists propose that sexual assault arises as a byproduct of psychological adaptations shaped by ancestral selection pressures favoring male strategies for opportunistic mating, especially among low-status males with limited consensual opportunities; this view posits rape not as a direct adaptation but as an extension of mechanisms for mate acquisition under conditions of resource scarcity or mate guarding failure.[32] Supporting evidence includes cross-species patterns where coercion correlates with male aggression and female choosiness, as well as human data showing elevated perpetration rates among young, unmarried males in contexts of high sex ratio imbalances or post-conflict environments.[31] Biologically, pronounced sex differences underpin the asymmetry in perpetration: males possess greater upper-body strength (approximately 50-60% more than females on average) and higher baseline aggression levels, traits linked to testosterone's organizational effects during prenatal development and activational influences in adulthood.[33] Circulating testosterone levels correlate positively with dominance-seeking and aggressive behaviors in men, with meta-analyses indicating modest but consistent associations (r ≈ 0.08-0.14) between endogenous testosterone and self-reported or observed aggression, particularly in competitive or provoked contexts; however, causal links remain debated, as experimental elevations (e.g., via administration) yield inconsistent aggression outcomes in humans, suggesting mediation by social status cues rather than direct impulsion.[34] [33] Neuroimaging studies further reveal that sexual offenders often exhibit prefrontal cortex hypoactivity, impairing impulse control and risk assessment, compounded by serotonergic dysregulation that amplifies reactive aggression.[35] Genetic factors contribute substantially to sexual offending risk, with a 37-year Swedish registry study of over 21,000 individuals estimating heritability at 40% (95% CI: 17-48%), driven more by additive genetic variance than shared environment; this effect was stronger for child molestation (46%) than adult rape (19%), and familial clustering persisted even after controlling for adoptive siblings, indicating transmitted liabilities beyond social learning.[36] Twin studies reinforce moderate genetic influences on related traits like antisocial behavior and sexual interests deviant from norms (e.g., pedophilia), with heritability estimates for male sexual interest in minors under 16 ranging 20-40% in extended twin designs.[37] These underpinnings interact with environmental triggers—such as early adversity or opportunity structures—rather than acting in isolation, explaining variability in expression; cross-culturally, perpetration remains overwhelmingly male (91-99% of reported cases), aligning with evolved sex differences despite cultural prohibitions.[38][36]Historical Evolution
Ancient and Pre-Modern Legal and Cultural Views
In ancient Mesopotamia, codified laws addressed sexual violence primarily as offenses against familial property and social order rather than individual consent. The Code of Hammurabi, inscribed around 1750 BCE, prescribed that a man who defiled a betrothed woman faced death for both parties if she did not protest, framing the act within communal standards of resistance; for an unbetrothed virgin, the perpetrator was required to pay a bride-price equivalent and marry her without option for divorce, compensating the family for lost marriage value.[39] Earlier Sumerian codes, such as the Codex of Ur-Nammu from circa 2100 BCE, imposed fines or corporal penalties for raping enslaved women, treating them as economic assets whose violation warranted restitution to owners.[40] These provisions reflected a causal emphasis on maintaining household lineage and economic stability, with punishments scaled by the victim's status—free women incurring harsher penalties than slaves—rather than uniform victim autonomy. Ancient Egyptian records, spanning the Old Kingdom to the New Kingdom (circa 2686–1070 BCE), viewed sexual violence as a moral transgression against ma'at (cosmic order), punishable by fines, beatings, or execution in severe cases, as evidenced in judicial papyri like the Harris Papyrus.[41] Rape of free women disrupted social harmony and family honor, often leading to community-mediated restitution, while assaults on slaves or lower-status individuals elicited lighter sanctions focused on compensation; family involvement in adjudication underscored patriarchal control over female sexuality.[42] In biblical Israelite law, Deuteronomy 22:23–27 distinguished urban from rural assaults: in a city, failure to cry out implied consent, punishing both parties as adulterers by stoning; in isolated areas, only the man died, recognizing practical inability to resist.[43] For unbetrothed virgins (Deuteronomy 22:28–29), the rapist paid 50 shekels to the father and married her permanently, providing economic security in a context where deflowered women faced diminished marital prospects, prioritizing clan continuity over punitive isolation of the victim.[44] In classical Greece, particularly Athens from the 5th–4th centuries BCE, rape (biai or hybris) was prosecuted as a violent assault on personal or familial honor, with penalties ranging from fines to exile or death depending on the victim's status and the perpetrator's citizenship; free citizen women and virgins received greater protection as embodiments of household purity, while slaves' assaults were rarely litigated beyond owner restitution.[45] Legal actions fell under graphe hybreos (indignity suit) rather than a distinct "rape" category, emphasizing harm to the male guardian's authority over female bodily violation.[46] Roman law evolved similarly, defining rape within stuprum (illicit sexual intercourse) or raptus (abduction with implied force), as in the Lex Julia de vi publica (circa 17 BCE), which imposed exile or death for stuprum per vim against freeborn women but framed it as corruption of public morals and family property.[47] Slaves and prostitutes faced no such protections, and enforcement prioritized elite interests, with consent secondary to status hierarchies.[48] Medieval European views, blending Roman inheritance with canon and secular law from the 5th–15th centuries CE, classified rape (raptus) as a felony against property or feudal order, punishable by castration, blinding, or hanging in secular codes like those of 12th-century England, though marital rape remained uncriminalized as a husband's conjugal right.[49] Canon law, as in Gratian's Decretum (circa 1140 CE), condemned non-consensual acts as grave sins violating natural law, distinguishing violent coercion from seduction but often requiring proof of resistance; ecclesiastical courts focused on moral penance over corporal punishment.[50] Across regions, victims' credibility hinged on virginity status and timely complaint, with low conviction rates reflecting evidentiary burdens and patriarchal presumptions that prioritized lineage preservation—such as forced marriage in some Germanic customs—over individual justice.[51] These frameworks empirically correlated punishments with socioeconomic impacts, underscoring causal links between sexual control and inheritance stability in agrarian societies.19th-20th Century Reforms
In the 19th century, reforms to sexual assault laws in England and the United States primarily targeted the age of consent to address child prostitution and seduction of minors, reflecting social purity movements led by religious and women's groups concerned with female chastity and moral order. In England, the age of consent for girls stood at 12 until the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885, spurred by journalist W.T. Stead's 1885 exposé "The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon," which detailed the trafficking of underage girls into brothels; the Act raised it to 16 and criminalized procurement of females under 18 for prostitution.[52] Similarly, the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 consolidated prior statutes, increasing penalties for carnal knowledge of girls under 10 to life imprisonment and treating acts against those aged 10-12 as felonies punishable by up to 20 years.[53] In the US, campaigns by the Woman's Christian Temperance Union and purity organizations raised the age from as low as 7-10 in some states to 14-18 by the 1890s, enacting strict liability for "statutory rape" where consent by the minor provided no defense, aimed at curbing male exploitation amid urbanization and immigration.[54] These changes shifted sexual assault from a mere property offense against the father to a crime against the person, though evidentiary burdens remained high, requiring proof of utmost resistance and corroboration in many jurisdictions. By the early 20th century, penalties for rape evolved: England's death penalty for rape was abolished in 1841, replaced by transportation or imprisonment, while US states increasingly imposed life sentences or castration in extreme cases, though conviction rates stayed low due to victim-blaming norms.[55] Twentieth-century reforms addressed marital exemptions and evidentiary rules, driven by second-wave feminist advocacy and legal critiques of common law doctrines like Sir Matthew Hale's 1736 presumption of irrevocable spousal consent. The UK's Sexual Offences Act 1956 first statutorily defined rape as unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent by a man over 16, using force or threats, but retained the marital exemption until its abolition in 1991.[56] In the US, states began criminalizing marital rape in the 1970s—Nebraska first in 1976—culminating in all 50 by 1993, alongside "rape shield" laws from the mid-1970s onward that barred evidence of victims' sexual history to reduce bias, as in Michigan's 1974 statute.[57] These shifts emphasized non-consent over violence alone, though implementation varied, with persistent low reporting due to cultural stigmas and prosecutorial skepticism.[58]Contemporary Shifts Post-2000
In the early 2000s, sexual assault policies began emphasizing victim-centered approaches, with reforms extending statutes of limitations for civil claims in several U.S. states to address delayed reporting linked to trauma.[59] By the mid-2010s, affirmative consent standards emerged as a key doctrinal shift, requiring explicit, ongoing agreement rather than mere absence of resistance; California enacted such a law for higher education institutions via Senate Bill 967 in 2014, mandating colleges to adopt policies defining consent as "affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement."[60] This model proliferated, influencing state laws like New York's 2015 affirmative consent statute, which specifies consent as a "knowing, voluntary, and mutual decision" via words or actions, thereby inverting traditional evidentiary burdens in adjudication.[61] The #MeToo movement, gaining momentum in 2017 after allegations against Harvey Weinstein, catalyzed global discourse on sexual misconduct, prompting surges in public allegations and media scrutiny.[62] Empirical data indicate a 10% rise in reported sexual crimes in the U.S. during #MeToo's initial years, alongside a doubling of self-reported rape or assault incidence from 1.4 to 2.7 per 1,000 persons aged 12+ between 2017 and 2018 per National Crime Victimization Survey metrics.[63][64] However, subsequent analyses, including a 2024 Tulane University study, found no statistically significant decline in harassment or assault prevalence post-#MeToo, with rates remaining stable at approximately 25% lifetime risk for women despite heightened awareness campaigns.[65][66] In the U.S. higher education sector, Title IX interpretations evolved significantly during the 2010s; the Obama administration's 2011 Dear Colleague Letter directed institutions to adopt lower evidentiary standards (preponderance of evidence) for sexual assault complaints and treat them as potential civil rights violations, leading to widespread campus policy overhauls prioritizing complainant protections.[67] Subsequent revisions under Secretary Betsy DeVos in 2017 and 2020 reinstated cross-examination rights and higher burdens in some proceedings to enhance due process for accused parties, reflecting critiques that prior frameworks risked procedural unfairness.[68] Internationally, Europe saw a wave of consent-focused rape laws post-2017, expanding from seven to 20 jurisdictions by emphasizing lack of freely given consent over force or violence as the offense core.[69] Federal sentencing data for sexual abuse offenses rose 62.5% from fiscal year 2020 to 2024, coinciding with these shifts, though causation remains debated amid varying underreporting estimates.[70] Critics, including legal scholars, argue affirmative consent and expedited Title IX processes have incentivized unverified claims, potentially eroding evidentiary rigor, as evidenced by challenges to campus policies lacking adversarial elements.[71] Overall, post-2000 developments prioritized proactive consent education and reporting mechanisms, yet empirical prevalence trends suggest persistent challenges in reducing incidence, underscoring tensions between advocacy-driven reforms and verifiable outcomes.[72]Forms and Categories
Rape and Forced Penetration
Rape constitutes the non-consensual penetration, however slight, of the vagina, anus, or mouth by a penis, other body part, or object.[73] This definition, adopted by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2012 and reflected in FBI Uniform Crime Reporting standards, expanded prior narrower formulations limited to penile-vaginal intercourse under force or threat.[73] Jurisdictional variations persist; for instance, some state laws retain requirements for penile penetration specifically for the charge of rape, classifying other acts as sexual assault or battery.[74] Consent absence is central, typically involving force, coercion, incapacity due to intoxication, or age-related inability, with empirical evidence indicating that alcohol impairment contributes to over 50% of reported cases in college samples.[75] Forced penetration encompasses scenarios where the victim is compelled to penetrate the perpetrator or another, distinct from traditional rape where the victim is penetrated.[76] In U.S. military law under Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, this includes penetration of the perpetrator's vulva, penis, or anus by the victim's body part or object, with intent to abuse or gratify sexual desire.[2] Such acts, often termed "made-to-penetrate" in surveys like the CDC's National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS), reveal underreporting among male victims; lifetime prevalence for U.S. men stands at approximately 4.8% for being made to penetrate a woman, compared to 1.7% for being raped (penetrated).[77] [78] Female perpetrators account for a majority of male "made-to-penetrate" cases, challenging narratives centered solely on male aggression, though conviction rates remain low due to definitional exclusions in many civilian statutes.[76] [79] Empirical prevalence data derive primarily from self-report surveys, which yield higher estimates than police records owing to underreporting—only about 31% of female victims and fewer male victims notify law enforcement.[80] Lifetime rape victimization affects roughly 18-20% of U.S. women via completed or attempted penetration, per meta-analyses of peer-reviewed studies, with annual incidence around 0.5-1% among adults.[4] [75] Male victimization rates are lower for penetration (1-2% lifetime), but aggregate sexual violence including forced penetration nears equivalence in some datasets when gender-neutral questions are used, highlighting methodological biases in victim-focused surveys that presume female vulnerability.[76] [81] Over 90% of reported perpetrators are male, with female-on-female or female-on-male penetration rare but documented in 5-10% of male victim cases via coercion rather than brute force.[63] [82] These patterns align with biological dimorphism in upper-body strength, enabling male physical overpowering, though cultural factors like alcohol facilitation and opportunity in intimate settings amplify incidence across genders.[83]| Victim Gender | Lifetime Rape Prevalence (Penetration) | Lifetime Made-to-Penetrate Prevalence | Primary Perpetrator Gender |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 18-20% | N/A (typically not applicable) | Male (90%+) |
| Male | 1-2% | 4-5% | Female (majority for MTP) |
Child Sexual Exploitation
Child sexual exploitation encompasses a range of abusive practices where individuals in positions of authority or influence coerce, entice, or force children under 18 into sexual activities, often exchanging something of value such as money, drugs, gifts, accommodation, or affection for compliance.[85] [86] This form of abuse exploits inherent power imbalances between adults (or older adolescents) and children, distinguishing it from consensual peer interactions, and includes both contact offenses like forced intercourse and non-contact forms such as producing or distributing child sexual abuse material (CSAM).[87] [88] Legally, in jurisdictions like the United States, it is codified as employing, persuading, or coercing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for visual depiction or other exploitative purposes.[87] Common forms include grooming, where abusers build trust to lower defenses before escalating to abuse; the "boyfriend model," involving manipulative pseudo-relationships; group-associated exploitation, such as organized grooming networks; and commercial variants like child sex trafficking or tourism.[89] [90] Online modalities have surged, encompassing sextortion (threatening to distribute explicit images unless further demands are met), live-streamed abuse, and enticement via social media or gaming platforms.[91] [92] These digital tactics leverage anonymity and accessibility, with perpetrators often initiating contact through flattery or shared interests to extract images or coerce meetings.[93] Prevalence estimates indicate widespread occurrence, though data challenges persist due to underreporting—victims often fear disbelief or retaliation—and reliance on retrospective self-reports, which may inflate or undercount based on recall biases.[94] Globally, approximately 1 billion children experience sexual violence, with self-reports suggesting 1 in 5 women and 1 in 13 men endured abuse before age 18; nearly half of first incidents occur by age 15.[95] [96] Online exploitation affects an estimated 300 million children annually, with 8% (1 in 12) encountering such abuse globally; in the UK, online grooming offenses rose 82% from 2018 to 2023.[97] [98] [99] Perpetrators are predominantly male (93.6% in U.S. federal cases) and known to the victim (93% of cases involving minors under 18), with family members—such as parents or stepparents—comprising a significant portion, including 42% in one survivor study of CSAM production.[38] [100] [101] No uniform psychological profile exists, but motivations often involve opportunity, pedophilic preferences, or opportunistic power assertion rather than stranger predation, challenging media emphases on rare "stranger danger" scenarios.[102] [103] Consequences for victims are profound and multifaceted, extending from immediate trauma to lifelong impairments. Short-term effects include behavioral disruptions, sexualized conduct, and withdrawal, while long-term outcomes encompass elevated risks of depression, anxiety, PTSD, substance abuse, eating disorders, and relational difficulties, including sexual dysfunction or revictimization.[104] [105] [106] Empirical data link these abuses to causal chains of neurobiological changes, such as altered stress responses, underscoring the need for early intervention to mitigate intergenerational transmission.[107]Adult Coercion and Harassment
Sexual coercion among adults refers to the use of non-physical pressure, manipulation, threats, or emotional tactics to compel unwanted sexual activity, distinguishing it from rape, which typically involves physical force or penetration without consent.[108] [109] Examples include repeated insistence despite refusal, leveraging authority or relationship dynamics for compliance, or exploiting intoxication short of incapacitation to obtain agreement.[110] [111] Legally, many jurisdictions treat coercion as a form of sexual assault but often classify it below rape in severity due to the absence of overt violence, though it undermines genuine consent and can lead to charges under broader assault statutes.[112] [113] Sexual harassment, a related but distinct category, encompasses unwelcome verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature that creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment, frequently occurring in workplaces, social settings, or relationships among adults.[114] Common manifestations include explicit comments, unwanted advances, or displays of sexual material, with prevalence data indicating lifetime experiences for 81% of women and 43% of men in the United States, per surveys aggregating harassment and assault.[75] [115] Recent estimates from 2024 report 26% of U.S. adults—over 68 million—facing harassment or assault in the prior year, with workplace filings showing women comprising 78.2% of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charges between fiscal years 2018 and 2021.[116] [114] Perpetration patterns reveal gender disparities, with men more frequently engaging in coercive acts—11.7% male vs. 6.5% female lifetime rates in one empirical analysis—yet female-initiated coercion occurs notably, including through relational pressure or substance facilitation, challenging narratives of unidirectional male aggression.[117] [118] Federal data and victim surveys confirm women as perpetrators in a minority but non-negligible share of cases, often underrecognized due to stereotypes minimizing female agency in sexual aggression.[119] [120] Methodological challenges in prevalence studies, including self-report biases and conflation of harassment with assault, inflate estimates from advocacy-oriented sources while undercounting male victims, who report lower disclosure rates amid social stigma.[121] [122] Both coercion and harassment contribute to adult sexual assault by eroding autonomy without physical violence, with empirical links to psychological distress comparable in severity to forcible acts when repeated or embedded in power imbalances.[123] [124] In professional contexts, such behaviors persist despite post-2017 reforms, with surveys noting declines in overt incidents but ongoing subtle pressures, underscoring enforcement gaps and cultural tolerances.[125]Specialized Cases (e.g., Elderly, Mass Incidents)
Sexual assault of elderly victims is characterized by heightened vulnerabilities stemming from physical decline, cognitive impairments such as dementia, and reliance on caregivers or institutional settings. Worldwide, an estimated 0.9% of older adults experience sexual victimization annually, though this figure likely understates true prevalence due to chronic underreporting.[126] Functional dependencies, including mobility limitations and chronic illnesses, exacerbate risks by limiting self-defense and escape capabilities, while social isolation and power imbalances with perpetrators—often family members, caregivers, or co-residents—facilitate exploitation.[127][128] Women, comprising the majority of elderly victims, face compounded threats in care facilities, where sexual abuse manifests as non-consensual touching, penetration, or coercion masked as care.[129] In nursing homes and similar long-term care environments, sexual abuse constitutes a distinct subset of elder mistreatment, with approximately 70% of substantiated reports originating in these settings.[130] Perpetrators include staff exploiting access during routine assistance with hygiene or mobility, as well as residents exhibiting hypersexual behaviors linked to disinhibition from dementia or medications. Victims often endure severe physical injuries like genital trauma or infections, alongside psychological sequelae including depression and post-traumatic stress, yet detection lags due to symptoms mimicking age-related conditions and institutional cover-ups to avoid liability.[131][132] Reporting barriers intensify with victims' fear of retaliation, placement disruptions, or dismissal by authorities skeptical of elderly sexual agency, leading to prosecution rates below 10% in documented cases.[133] Mass incidents of sexual assault, encompassing gang rapes and organized wartime violations, involve coordinated multiple perpetrators, escalating brutality through group reinforcement and victim dehumanization. Gang rapes, comprising 5-10% of reported sexual assaults in some jurisdictions, correlate with higher rates of weapon use, injury, and homicide compared to solo offenses, as perpetrators embolden one another via shared impunity.[134] These events disproportionately target vulnerable groups in unstructured settings like parties or streets, with victims facing compounded trauma from public humiliation and social ostracism.[135] Wartime mass rapes exemplify strategic deployment of sexual violence to demoralize populations, as seen in World War II where Soviet forces perpetrated an estimated 2 million rapes in Germany alone, often involving gang assaults on civilians.[136] In the Bosnian War (1992-1995), systematic rapes by Serb forces numbered in the tens of thousands, aimed at ethnic cleansing through impregnation and terror. More recently, during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, documented cases included over 100 verified rapes by troops, frequently in occupied homes with family members forced to witness.[137] Such incidents persist post-conflict due to weak accountability mechanisms, with UN reports indicating rape as a recurring tactic in 20+ ongoing conflicts, yielding intergenerational effects like orphaned children and societal stigma.[138][139] Prosecution challenges arise from evidentiary destruction, perpetrator anonymity in chaos, and political reluctance to alienate allies, underscoring causal links between command tolerance and recurrence.[140]Etiology and Contributing Factors
Perpetrator Profiles and Motivations
Perpetrators of sexual assault against adults are predominantly male, with data from victim surveys estimating that nearly 99% of such offenses against female victims are committed by men.[141] Federal sentencing statistics for sexual abuse offenses, which include forcible acts, confirm that 93.6% of convicted offenders in fiscal year 2021 were male.[100] Demographically, no uniform profile exists, as offenders vary across races, ages, and socioeconomic statuses; among federal cases that year, 57.5% were White, 16.1% Black, 12.1% Native American, and 11.8% Hispanic, with average ages around 37 for certain subtypes like statutory rape perpetrators.[100] [84] Most offenses—approximately 80%—involve perpetrators known to the victim, such as current or former intimate partners (33%) or acquaintances (39%), rather than strangers.[142] [143] Repeat offending is prevalent, with prior perpetration serving as the strongest predictor of future assaults, and recidivism rates ranging from 14% to 68% across studies.[144] Psychologically, perpetrators frequently display traits including hostility toward women, acceptance of rape myths (e.g., beliefs that victims provoke assault or that sex implies consent), deficits in empathy and emotional intimacy, and elevated dark triad characteristics such as psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism.[145] [146] [28] Research links these to broader patterns of hypermasculinity, adversarial sexual beliefs, and poor attachment styles, often compounded by childhood exposure to physical abuse or family violence, though such histories do not explain the majority of cases.[144] [28] Many exhibit impulsivity, antisocial tendencies, and cognitive distortions that minimize harm or externalize blame, with alcohol involvement in about 50% of incidents acting as a disinhibitor rather than a root cause.[144] [147] Motivations combine sexual, power-based, and aggressive elements, challenging theories that frame assault solely as dominance without libido.[148] Nicholas Groth's typology, validated in offender classifications, delineates power-reassurance types (using force to affirm masculinity amid insecurity), power-assertive (driven by sexual entitlement), anger-retaliatory (venting misogynistic rage), and sadistic subtypes, reflecting varying degrees of aggression and sexual components.[149] [150] The confluence model empirically accounts for up to 30% of variance in perpetration risk through interactions of hostile masculinity (e.g., viewing women as manipulators) and impersonal sexual attitudes (e.g., early promiscuity and casual sex orientations).[148] Self-reports and incident analyses reveal justifications rooted in perceived peer approval, misread cues of consent, and entitlement, with sexual gratification often instrumental alongside control-seeking; critiques of purely non-sexual "hate crime" framings note their underemphasis on biological and opportunity-driven factors evident in self-admitted willingness to offend absent consequences.[146] [151] [148]Victim Risk Factors and Vulnerabilities
Empirical studies identify prior sexual victimization as a significant risk factor for subsequent assaults, with childhood sexual abuse survivors facing elevated revictimization rates in adulthood due to factors such as impaired boundary-setting and repeated exposure to exploitative environments.[152] [153] One analysis of sexually abused children found girls 130% more likely than boys to experience revictimization, highlighting developmental vulnerabilities that persist without intervention.[154] Substance use, particularly alcohol consumption, correlates strongly with victimization risk by reducing situational awareness and physical resistance. The National Institute of Justice's Campus Sexual Assault study reported alcohol involvement in at least half of college sexual assaults, often rendering victims incapacitated and increasing opportunistic attacks.[155] Behavioral patterns like frequent intoxication in social settings amplify this vulnerability, as impaired judgment facilitates progression from consensual interactions to coercion.[156] Individuals with mental illnesses or disabilities exhibit heightened susceptibility, as cognitive or physical limitations hinder evasion or resistance. Persons with severe mental illness face elevated assault risks, with vulnerabilities stemming from dependency on caregivers or misjudgment of threats.[157] Among those with disabilities, 33% of abusers are acquaintances or family members, exploiting trust and isolation.[158] Lifestyle choices involving multiple sexual partners or high-risk environments, such as unsupervised partying, further elevate exposure by increasing encounters with potential perpetrators. Research links greater numbers of partners and prior non-consensual experiences to ongoing risk, independent of demographic traits, through patterns of desensitization or normalized boundary violations.[156] These factors operate causally via opportunity creation and reduced protective behaviors, though they do not mitigate perpetrator accountability.[155]Environmental and Cultural Influences
Alcohol consumption is a significant environmental factor in sexual assault perpetration, with studies indicating that approximately 50% of perpetrators are under the influence at the time of the offense, ranging from 30% to 75% across analyses.[159] [160] This association arises from alcohol's impairment of cognitive processing, judgment, and impulse control, facilitating misinterpretation of social cues and aggressive behaviors.[161] Victim intoxication similarly elevates vulnerability, often in settings like parties or bars where heavy drinking occurs.[162] Urban environments contribute through higher population density and anonymity, correlating with elevated rates of certain sexual offenses compared to rural areas, though divorced or separated women in rural locales face disproportionately higher risks of rape or assault.[163] [164] Overcrowded housing exacerbates intra-household risks, with each incremental increase in density linked to 23-46% higher odds of child sexual abuse allegations.[165] Conversely, access to green public spaces inversely predicts sexual crime incidence, particularly in disadvantaged neighborhoods, suggesting that natural environments may deter opportunistic assaults via increased visibility and guardianship.[166] Cultural norms surrounding gender roles and sexuality influence perpetration rates, as evidenced in conflict zones where groups endorsing unequal gender norms exhibit higher sexual violence.[167] Cross-cultural data reveal that societies with rigid patriarchal structures or sexually restrictive attitudes may underreport incidents, while more permissive environments potentially normalize boundary-testing behaviors, though direct causation remains debated due to measurement inconsistencies.[168] [169] Exposure to violent pornography heightens sexual aggression risks, with experimental and correlational studies showing it increases tolerance for violence and predicts self-reported perpetration or victimization, independent of other variables like alcohol use.[170] [171] [172] Family structure disruptions, such as single-parent households or instability, correlate with broader violent crime elevations, including sexual offenses, through reduced supervision and modeling of prosocial behaviors, with cities featuring high single-parenthood rates showing correspondingly higher homicide and assault figures.[173] [174] [175] These patterns persist after controlling for socioeconomic factors, underscoring causal pathways via weakened social controls rather than mere correlation.[174]Prevalence and Data Challenges
Empirical Estimates and Recent Trends
In the United States, the Bureau of Justice Statistics' National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) estimates annual rates of rape and sexual assault victimization at approximately 1 to 2.7 per 1,000 persons aged 12 or older in recent years, with the rate reaching 2.7 per 1,000 in 2018 following expanded survey questions to capture a broader range of unwanted sexual experiences.[63] Long-term NCVS data indicate a substantial decline in these rates from the early 1990s, when violent victimization overall stood at 79.8 per 1,000 persons, dropping to around 22.5 per 1,000 by 2023, with rape and sexual assault following a parallel downward trajectory due to factors such as improved law enforcement and societal changes, though exact pre-2015 sexual assault rates were lower under prior narrower definitions.[176] Recent annual reports show stability, with total violent victimization rates holding steady at 22.5 per 1,000 in 2023 and 23.3 per 1,000 in 2024, and no significant uptick in sexual assault specifically beyond the 2018 adjustment.[177][178] Lifetime prevalence estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) indicate that about one in four women (approximately 25%) and one in 26 men (3.8%) have experienced completed or attempted rape, while broader sexual violence—including unwanted sexual contact—affects higher proportions, with nearly half of women (47.6%) reporting such experiences.[179] Past-12-month prevalence is lower, with NISVS data from 2016–2017 showing contact sexual violence experienced by 3.2% of women and made-to-penetrate incidents by about one in nine men lifetime.[63] These figures derive from telephone surveys of adults aged 18 and older, capturing self-reported incidents regardless of reporting to authorities, though they rely on respondent recall and definitions that include coerced acts short of force.[180] Globally, the World Health Organization estimates that nearly one in three women (30%) have experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence or non-partner sexual violence in their lifetime, with sexual violence alone comprising a subset where prevalence varies by region, often around 10–15% for non-partner assaults in population-based surveys.[181] Recent UNICEF analysis of childhood sexual violence, encompassing rape and assault, indicates over 370 million girls and women worldwide were victimized before age 18, equating to roughly 15% lifetime prevalence for females.[182] Trends show persistent high rates in conflict zones, with United Nations verification documenting over 4,600 conflict-related sexual violence cases in 2024 alone, amid warnings of escalation as a tactic of war.[183] Data challenges persist internationally due to varying definitions, underreporting, and reliance on self-reports in low-resource settings.[181]Demographic Patterns Including Gender Differences
Sexual assault victimization rates differ markedly by gender, with women experiencing higher prevalence of forced penetration. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) estimates that 18.3% of U.S. women and 1.4% of men have experienced completed rape (defined as forced penetration) in their lifetime.[63] Broader measures including attempted rape show 1 in 4 women and 1 in 26 men affected.[179] Male victims, however, report distinct experiences; approximately 1 in 9 men have been "made to penetrate" another person, a form of sexual victimization not classified as rape under some definitions, with 71.7% of such male victims citing exclusively female perpetrators.[77] Perpetration patterns reinforce gender asymmetry: 93.5% of individuals sentenced federally for sexual abuse offenses are male.[70] Age demographics reveal peak vulnerability in youth and young adulthood for victims. Among reported sexual assaults, 69% of victims are aged 12 to 34, with 15% aged 12-17 and 54% aged 18-34; females aged 16-19 face rates four times higher than the general population.[184] Perpetrators tend to be older, with 50% aged 30 or above.[185] The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) indicates that serious violent crimes, including sexual assault, disproportionately affect those under 25, comprising over 52% of rape/sexual assault victims.[186] Racial and ethnic patterns in perpetration show overrepresentation of certain groups relative to population shares. Among federal sentences for sexual abuse, perpetrators are 55.1% White, 15.2% Hispanic, 13.9% Black, 13.0% Native American, and 2.8% Asian/Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander.[70] Victimization data by race are less granular in aggregate surveys, but revictimization rates vary, with White women experiencing lower rates (39%) compared to Black women (55%).[63] These patterns derive primarily from self-reported surveys like NISVS and NCVS, which capture unreported incidents but face challenges from recall bias and definitional inconsistencies across studies.[187]Reporting Biases, False Claims, and Methodological Flaws
Sexual assaults are substantially underreported to law enforcement, with estimates indicating that only 37% of incidents are reported, primarily due to victims' fear of reprisal, shame, or disbelief by authorities.[188] This underreporting bias results in official crime statistics underestimating true prevalence, as police data capture only a fraction of occurrences while surveys reveal higher rates through anonymous self-reporting. Conversely, incentives for false claims exist in contexts like custody disputes or post-regret scenarios, potentially inflating reported cases and eroding public trust in victims; empirical studies classify 2-10% of reports as false based on criteria such as recantations or evidentiary contradictions.[189] [6] False allegation rates remain contentious, with advocacy-oriented sources like the National Sexual Violence Resource Center citing 2-8% from select police classifications, often excluding "unfounded" cases that do not meet strict false-report thresholds.[6] Higher estimates emerge from Eugene Kanin's analysis of small-town police data (1978-1987), where 41% of rape reports were deemed false after thorough investigation, including perpetrator admissions of fabrication, though critiqued for non-representative samples and potential over-reliance on recantations.[190] [191] David Lisak's review defends lower rates but acknowledges methodological challenges in distinguishing false from unsubstantiated claims, noting that media amplification of rare high-profile fabrications (e.g., Duke lacrosse case, 2006) skews perceptions despite their infrequency.[191] Institutions with left-leaning biases, such as certain academic outlets, tend to minimize false claim prevalence to prioritize victim advocacy, potentially understating risks to the accused.[192] Methodological flaws in prevalence surveys exacerbate inaccuracies; the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) employs behaviorally specific questions (e.g., "made to penetrate" or unwanted oral contact) that yield lifetime rape estimates of 18.3% for women versus 1.4% for men, but critics highlight retrospective recall biases, where distant events are misremembered or reinterpreted through current lenses.[193] [194] Broad definitions encompassing regretted consensual acts or non-forced intoxications inflate figures, as evidenced by varying estimates across surveys: NISVS reports higher rates than the National Crime Victimization Survey due to explicit prompting, which may encourage affirmative responses absent in general queries.[195] [4] Social desirability effects further distort self-reports, with respondents potentially exaggerating victimization in anonymous formats to align with cultural narratives emphasizing female vulnerability.[196] Gender biases compound these issues, as male victims face underreporting due to stigma, while female-perpetrated assaults are often reclassified or minimized in data collection.[197] Overall, these flaws—coupled with inconsistent cross-study methodologies—hinder causal inference and policy formulation, underscoring the need for triangulated evidence beyond self-reports.[198]Consequences and Ramifications
Victim Health and Psychological Outcomes
Sexual assault victims frequently experience immediate physical injuries, with 39.1% reporting harm such as bruises, cuts, or vaginal tears according to data from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) spanning 2010–2012.[199] Additionally, 12.3% of victims contract sexually transmitted infections as a direct result, including risks for HIV, gonorrhea, and chlamydia, though empirical rates vary by assault characteristics like condom use or perpetrator infection status.[199] Unwanted pregnancy occurs in a subset of female victims, estimated at 5% in some cohorts, necessitating medical interventions.[77] These acute outcomes often require emergency care, but underreporting limits precise population-level incidence.[200] Long-term physical health burdens include elevated risks for chronic conditions, independent of socioeconomic confounders in adjusted analyses. Rape victimization correlates with 1.4 times higher odds of asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, frequent headaches, and sleep difficulties, alongside 1.5 times greater odds of chronic pain and poor overall physical health.[199] Victims also face increased activity limitations (AOR 1.4) and equipment use needs (AOR 1.4), suggesting persistent somatic effects potentially mediated by stress-induced physiological changes like hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation.[199] These associations hold across studies but may reflect bidirectional causality, as preexisting health issues could heighten vulnerability to assault.[179] Psychologically, sexual assault elevates risks for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), with meta-analytic evidence from prospective studies showing 74.6% of victims meeting diagnostic criteria at one month post-assault, declining to 41.5% at twelve months, higher than rates following non-sexual traumas.[201] Overall effect sizes indicate strong links (Hedges' g = 0.71; OR = 3.39), moderated by factors like stranger involvement or weapon use, which amplify symptom severity.[29] Depression follows closely (g = 0.60; OR = 2.87; prevalence exceeding 30%), as do anxiety (g = 0.53; OR = 2.46) and suicidality (g = 0.74), with NISVS data reporting 50.6% of female victims experiencing PTSD symptoms in the prior year.[29][202] Substance use disorders show weaker but significant ties (g = 0.37; OR = 2.43), often as coping mechanisms.[29] Outcomes vary by individual resilience, prior trauma history, and support access, with some victims showing rapid recovery within three months while others face chronic impairment; not all develop disorders, underscoring multifactorial etiology over deterministic victimhood.[201] Elevated suicide risk persists, with assaulted individuals exhibiting higher lifetime ideation and attempts, potentially doubled in odds per meta-reviews, though causal pathways involve comorbid PTSD and depression rather than assault alone.[29][203] Academic sources, while data-rich, often emphasize harms, warranting scrutiny for selection biases favoring symptomatic cases over resilient ones in clinical samples.[29]Broader Societal and Economic Burdens
The economic burdens of sexual assault extend beyond individual victims to impose substantial costs on healthcare systems, employers, and taxpayers. In the United States, the lifetime economic cost per rape victim is estimated at $122,461, covering medical treatment, mental health services, lost earnings, and other direct and indirect expenses.[204] A 2017 analysis of adult rape victimization projects a total national lifetime burden of $3.1 trillion, with breakdowns including $1.2 trillion (39%) for medical and mental health care, $1.6 trillion (52%) for reduced productivity among victims and perpetrators, $234 billion (8%) for criminal justice responses such as policing and incarceration, and $23 billion (<1%) for tangible property damage.30615-8/fulltext) Healthcare expenditures form a core component, as survivors incur elevated utilization of emergency services, therapy, and long-term treatment for physical injuries, sexually transmitted infections, and psychological conditions like PTSD. Average out-of-pocket medical bills following emergency care for sexual assault reach nearly $4,000 per survivor, despite federal requirements under the Violence Against Women Act for states to cover rape kits and initial treatments without cost to victims; implementation gaps often result in uninsured or underinsured individuals bearing these loads, straining public health budgets.[205] [206] Lost productivity amplifies economic impacts, with victims experiencing immediate wage reductions and career disruptions; for instance, sexual assault leads to approximately $2,200 in individual losses from decreased work output and absenteeism in the short term, while long-term effects include job changes or exits from the workforce, contributing to broader employer costs estimated in billions annually.[207] These losses extend to perpetrators, whose convictions or social repercussions diminish their earning potential, and to families affected by caregiving demands or secondary trauma. Criminal justice outlays further burden public finances, funding investigations, prosecutions, and victim compensation programs that divert resources from other societal priorities.30615-8/fulltext) Societal burdens manifest in eroded community trust and resource allocation strains, as high caseloads overwhelm law enforcement and courts, with sexual assault cases comprising a notable portion of violent crime dockets and requiring specialized forensic and support infrastructure. For child sexual abuse alone, annual U.S. costs exceed $9 billion, incorporating not only direct victim services but also child welfare interventions and special education needs stemming from developmental harms.[208] These aggregate effects underscore how sexual assault perpetuates cycles of dependency on social services, potentially hindering overall economic growth through diminished human capital and innovation.30615-8/fulltext)Impacts on the Accused and Justice System Integrity
False accusations of sexual assault, estimated at 2% to 10% of reported cases based on meta-analyses of police classifications, impose severe and often irreversible harms on the accused, including psychological trauma, financial ruin, and social isolation.[209][192] These figures likely understate the true rate, as many unproven allegations are not formally deemed false due to methodological limitations in detection and classification.[188] Even when exonerated, individuals endure prolonged legal battles, reputational damage, and loss of employment; surveys of those falsely accused report widespread job termination or demotion, with long-term mental health effects such as depression and post-traumatic stress.[210][211] In high-profile instances, the consequences extend to incarceration and suicide. For example, American football player Brian Banks served over five years in prison following a 2002 false rape accusation before his accuser recanted in 2012, highlighting how initial credibility granted to claims can lead to wrongful convictions.[212] The 2006 Duke University lacrosse case involved three players falsely accused of rape by a stripper; charges were dropped in April 2007 by North Carolina's Attorney General, who declared them innocent victims of a "tragic rush to accuse," yet the ordeal disrupted their education, athletics careers, and personal lives, with the accuser admitting fabrication in 2024.[213][214] Such cases underscore a pattern where accused individuals face heightened suicide risk, as documented in accounts of men experiencing devastation from unsubstantiated claims.[215] These occurrences compromise justice system integrity by eroding the presumption of innocence and due process, particularly amid pressures to prioritize accuser narratives over evidence. In the UK, for 2023, London police recorded 10,991 rape reports but only 1,419 charges, with approximately half of sexual offense investigations closed due to evidential difficulties, reflecting systemic challenges in substantiating claims yet revealing potential for pursuing weak cases under public or activist influence.[216][217] Crown Prosecution Service data for quarter 1 2025-2026 shows rape conviction rates at 58.3% of prosecuted cases, but the high volume of uncharged allegations—coupled with advocacy for "believe the victim" protocols—has led to criticisms of rushed prosecutions that bypass rigorous scrutiny, fostering miscarriages and diminished public trust.[218] In the US, similar dynamics post-#MeToo have amplified extrajudicial punishments, where accusations alone trigger professional sanctions without adjudication, weakening foundational legal principles and incentivizing unsubstantiated reports.[219] This imbalance risks broader skepticism toward genuine victims, as repeated false claims dilute evidentiary standards and overburden resources, ultimately undermining the system's capacity for impartial truth-finding.[220]
