Hubbry Logo
Asian peopleAsian peopleMain
Open search
Asian people
Community hub
Asian people
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Asian people
Asian people
Asian people
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

"Asian people"[1] (sometimes "Asiatic people")[2] is an umbrella term for people who belong to any ethnic, racial, or national group with origins in Asia. It is most often used in contexts concerning the Asian diaspora, which consists of Asian people and their descendants living outside of the continent.[3] The exact definition of the term may vary by country; some classifications of "Asian" may only refer to certain Asian-origin groups, as opposed to the population of the entire continent.

Meanings by region

[edit]

Anglophone Africa and the Caribbean

[edit]
Further information: Indian South Africans, Asian Caribbeans, Indo-Caribbean, Chinese Caribbean, Indo-African (disambiguation), and Afro-Asians

In parts of anglophone Africa, especially East Africa and in parts of the Caribbean, the term "Asian" is more commonly associated with people of South Asian origin, particularly Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Sri Lankans.[4] In South Africa the term "Asian" is also usually synonymous with the Indian race group.[5] East Asians in South Africa, including Chinese were classified either as Coloureds or as honorary whites.[5]

Arab countries of the Persian Gulf

[edit]

In the Arab states of the Persian Gulf, the term "Asian" generally refers to people of South Asian and Southeast Asian descent due to the large Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and Filipino expatriate populations in these countries.[6][7][8] However, there are instances where the term is used solely to refer to those of South Asian descent.[9]

Australia

[edit]
Main articles: Asian Australians and Indian Australians

The Australian Census includes four regions of Asia in its official definition. Defined by the 2006–2011 Australian Census, three broad groups have the word Asian included in their name: Central and Southern Asian, South-East Asian and North-East Asian. West Asians are classified as North African and Middle Eastern.[10]

Canada

[edit]
Main articles: Asian Canadians, East Asian Canadians, South Asian Canadians, and West Asian Canadians

The Canadian Census uses the term 'Asian' pan-continentally. In its presentation of the "ethnic origin" results of the 2016 census, Statistics Canada under the category "Asian origins" includes: West Central Asian and Middle Eastern (includes "Arab, not otherwise specified"), South Asian, East and Southeast Asian, and "other" Asian origins.[11]

New Zealand

[edit]
Main article: Asian New Zealanders

New Zealand's census undertaken by Statistics New Zealand defines Asian to include people of Bangladeshi, Chinese, Indian, Korean, Filipino, Japanese, Vietnamese, Sri Lankan, Cambodian and Thai ancestries.[12] In less formal contexts, the term Asian often does not refer to South Asian people.[13] Those of West or Central Asian origin are excluded from the term.

Norway

[edit]

Statistics Norway uses the term 'Asian' pan-continentally and considers people of Asian background to be people from all Asian countries.[14][15]

Sweden

[edit]
Main article: Asian in Sweden

Statistics Sweden uses the term 'Asian' to refer to immigrants of Asian background from all Asian countries, including Western Asia/the Middle East.[16][17] West Asians make up the largest region of Asian descent in the country, with Iraq once being the largest group of Asian immigrants.[18]

United Kingdom

[edit]
Main articles: British Asian, East Asians in the United Kingdom, and British Indo-Caribbean people

In the United Kingdom, the term "Asian" is more commonly associated with people of South Asian origin, particularly Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Sri Lankans.[4][19] Most respondents to the UK 2001 Census of non-Chinese East Asian and Southeast Asian descent chose to write-in their ethnicity in the "Other Ethnic Group" category rather than the "Other Asian" category, reflecting the association of the word Asian in the UK with South Asian.[20] Despite there being a strong presence of East Asians in the United Kingdom there are considerably more South Asians, for example the 2001 Census recorded 1.05 million people of Indian origin and 247,000 of Chinese origin in the UK.[21] Common origins in the "Other Asian" category include Filipinos, Afghans and Nepalese.[22] Peter J. Aspinall of the Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, recommends privileging the term "South Asian" over the term "Asian", since the term "Asian" is a "contested term".[19]

United States

[edit]
Main articles: Asian Americans, Racial classification of Indian Americans, and Indo-Caribbean Americans
Asian ancestries as defined by the 2000 U.S. census

In 1968, an Asian activist conference decided on favoring the name "Asian American" over the competing terms—"yellow", "Mongoloid", "Asiatic", and "Oriental"—since the Filipinos at the meeting thought they were "brown" rather than "yellow" and the conference thought the term "Oriental" was Eurocentric since they originate from lands "east" only from Europe's standpoint and the term "Oriental" suggested to them "passivity".[23]

Earlier Census forms from 1980 and prior listed particular Asian ancestries as separate groups along with White and Black or Negro.[24] Previously, Asian Americans were classified as "other".[25] But the 1980 Census marked the first general analyses of Asians as a group, combining several individual ancestry groups into "Asian or Pacific Islander." By the 1990 census, Asian or Pacific Islander (API) was included as an explicit category, although respondents had to select one particular ancestry.[26][27][28]

The 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census Bureau definition of the Asian race is: "people having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent (for example, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam)".[29]

Sandra S. Lee et al. (2001) said, in regards to the categories of the 2000 U.S. census, that it is difficult to determine why Asian Americans are a "race" while Latino and Hispanic are an "ethnic group." Lee said, referring to the Hispanic or Latino category, that the category of Asian Americans, quite similarly, comprises different populations of diverse origins. Lee said that people of South Asian origin were categorically identified as "Hindu," regardless of their religion, in the early 20th century. Lee said that the policy changed to classify people from the Indian subcontinent as "white." Lee said that, more recently, South Asian Americans were added to the long list of groups that comprise the category of Asian American. Referring to their classification as "Asian," Lee said that, in the United States, the classification of people from the Indian subcontinent depends on their historical location.[30]

In 1930 and 1940, Indian Americans were identified as a separate race, Hindu, and in 1950 and 1960 they were racially classified as Other Race, and then in 1970 they were classified as White. Since 1980, Indians and all other South Asians have been classified as part of the Asian ethnic group.[31] Sociologist Madhulika Khandelwal described how "....as a result of activism, South Asians came to be included as 'Asians' in the census only in the 80's. Prior to that many South Asians had been checking 'Caucasian' or 'Other'."[32]

Respondents can also report their specific ancestry, e.g.: Okinawan, etc. Someone reporting these ancestries but no race would be classified as "Asian". Unlike Southeast Asians, Afghan Americans, Arab Americans, Armenian Americans, Assyrian Americans, Azerbaijani Americans, Georgian Americans, Israeli Americans, Kurdish Americans, Turkish Americans, Iranian Americans, and Central Asian Americans have not lobbied to be included as Asians by the U.S. Census Board.[33]

In normal American usage Asian does not refer to the people from the Pacific Islands who are usually called Pacific Islanders.[34] The term "Asians and Pacific Islanders" or "Asia/Pacific" was used on the 1990 U.S. census.[35]

However, in the 2000 U.S. census, the Asian or Pacific Islander category was separated into two categories, "Asian" and "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander".[36]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Asian people

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Asian people are the indigenous ethnic groups and their descendants native to , the world's largest by both land area and , comprising approximately 4.84 billion individuals as of October 2025 and representing over 60% of global humanity. This exhibits profound ethnic, linguistic, and cultural diversity, with major groups including the (the world's largest single ethnicity), Bengalis, Arabs, Punjabis, Japanese, and Javanese—each exceeding 100 million members—alongside hundreds of smaller adapted to varied ecologies from Arctic tundra to tropical archipelagos. Speaking languages from Sino-Tibetan, Indo-European, Austronesian, and Altaic families, Asian peoples have developed resilient social structures, often kinship-based, that prioritize collectivism, , and hierarchical order in many East and South Asian societies. Historically, Asian populations birthed some of humanity's earliest civilizations, including the in (c. 1600–1050 BCE), which pioneered —the precursor to modern Chinese writing—and advanced bronze metallurgy for ritual and warfare. Subsequent eras saw innovations like the Song dynasty's (960–1279 CE) printing, applications, and mechanical clocks, fueling commerce and governance across vast empires. In , the Indus Valley Civilization (c. 3300–1300 BCE) engineered sophisticated with drainage systems and standardized weights, while West Asian Mesopotamians formalized writing and legal codes influencing subsequent societies. These achievements underscore causal drivers such as geographic isolation fostering independent invention, dense agrarian populations enabling specialization, and adaptive responses to environmental pressures like monsoons and steppes. Contemporary Asian societies dominate global manufacturing and technology, with East Asian nations like and leading in and semiconductors, though challenges persist including rates (e.g., below 1.3 in and ) driving and elder care burdens. Controversies surrounding Asian peoples often stem from internal dynamics, such as 's perpetuating despite legal reforms, or East Asia's historical imperial expansions and modern territorial disputes rooted in ethno-nationalist claims. Empirical genetic studies reveal regional clusters, with East Asians showing higher frequencies of alleles linked to cognitive traits, contributing to elevated average IQ scores (around 105) compared to global norms, though such findings face interpretive biases in Western academia favoring environmental explanations over heritable factors.

Definition and Scope

Geographical Origins

The ancestors of modern Asian populations descend from anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) who migrated beginning around 70,000 years ago, with initial dispersals reaching South and via coastal routes along the . Archaeological evidence from sites like Tam Hay Marklot cave in yields H. sapiens fossils dated 68,000–86,000 years ago, marking among the earliest confirmed presence of modern humans in and challenging models of solely later northern Eurasian expansions. Genetic analyses corroborate multiple migration waves into , including a primary southern trajectory that populated East and by differentiating from African source populations through isolation and local adaptation. In South Asia, the genetic foundations of contemporary populations stem from a cline of ancient ancestries, blending indigenous hunter-gatherer groups akin to Andaman Islanders with later influxes from Iranian-related farmers around 9,000–4,000 years ago and Bronze Age steppe herders from the north after 2,000 BCE, as revealed by sequencing of 523 ancient individuals across the region. Southeast Asian groups trace origins to these early southern migrants, with subsequent admixture from East Asian-like expansions and Austronesian seafaring dispersals post-4,000 BCE, evidenced by shared maternal lineages connecting southern East Asians to regional foragers. East Asian lineages, including those in China and Japan, derive primarily from ancient East Eurasian hunter-gatherers who arrived via the southern route before 40,000 years ago, followed by Neolithic expansions of rice-farming populations from the Yangtze and Yellow River basins around 10,000–8,000 years ago, driving genetic homogenization across the area by 9,000 years ago. Central and West Asian populations exhibit layered origins, with H. sapiens evidence in Tajikistan's Zeravshan Valley spanning 150,000–20,000 years ago, incorporating both arrivals and potential archaic admixture before dominant West Eurasian influences from the and steppe regions integrated via migrations around 3,000 BCE. These patterns reflect Asia's role as a mosaic of serial migrations, bottlenecks, and regional differentiations, rather than a singular point of origin, with Y-chromosome and markers indicating northward from southern bases into northern latitudes by 30,000–20,000 years ago.

Ethnic and Anthropological Definition

Asian peoples encompass the indigenous populations historically native to the , ethnically defined by shared descent, endogamous patterns, linguistic affiliations, and cultural traditions that have evolved over through isolation, migration, and adaptation. These groups number in the thousands, with no singular ethnic archetype; instead, they cluster into subregional categories such as East Asians (predominantly Sino-Tibetan and Japonic speakers), South Asians (Indo-European and Dravidian speakers), Southeast Asians (Austroasiatic and Austronesian speakers), Central Asians (Turkic and Indo-Iranian speakers), and West Asians (Semitic and Indo-Iranian speakers), reflecting ancient population expansions and interactions. Genetic evidence indicates that ethnic boundaries in regions like often align more with cultural and societal norms than strict ancestry, as intergroup has blurred genetic discontinuities despite self-identified distinctions. Anthropologically, Asian populations exhibit clinal variation in physical traits and genetics, stemming from multiple Out-of-Africa migrations around 60,000–50,000 years ago, followed by regional radiations, archaic admixtures (e.g., up to 5% in some Southeast Asian groups), and local selective pressures. of autosomal DNA consistently resolves major clusters: East Asians form a tight group characterized by high frequencies of alleles like EDAR 370A (linked to hair thickness and dental morphology), distinct from the broader South Asian cline influenced by ancient Iranian farmer and steppe pastoralist ancestries (contributing 10–20% in northern groups), while Central and West Asians show intermediate positions with partial overlap toward European-like components due to Indo-European expansions around 2000 BCE. These patterns underscore adaptations such as in northern populations for ultraviolet-mediated production and compact body builds in cold-steppe environments, but reject outdated typological "races" like , as variation within exceeds that between some continental groups. In physical , traits like epicanthic eye folds (prevalent in 80–90% of East Asians) and correlate with genetic clusters but occur as gradients, with frequencies declining westward and southward due to admixture; similarly, South Asian groups display greater diversity in cranial indices and stature, averaging 160–170 cm for males, shaped by nutritional and climatic factors. Modern DNA-based studies since the have shifted focus from morphology to genomic markers, revealing that while continental-scale clusters exist (e.g., East Asians separated from others by Fst distances of 0.10–0.15), substructure within regions—such as between —highlights the mosaic nature of Asian ancestry, with no pan-Asian genetic unity. This empirical framework prioritizes measurable divergence over socially imposed categories, accounting for historical events like the steppe migrations that introduced R1a haplogroups across Central and around 3000–1500 BCE.

Etymological and Terminological Variations

The word originates from the Ἀσία (Asía), first documented by around 440 BCE in reference to (modern western ) or the lands of the Persian Empire east of . This Greek term likely derives from the Akkadian asu, meaning "to rise" or "sunrise," signifying the eastern direction from , thus evoking the "land of the rising sun." By the Roman era, the name had broadened to denote larger eastern territories, but it initially excluded much of what is now considered East, , and , reflecting a Eurocentric perspective centered on proximity to the Mediterranean world. The adjective "Asian," denoting peoples or attributes associated with , entered English around 1300 CE via Latin Asiaticus and , initially applied narrowly to Asia Minor before expanding with European and in the 16th–19th centuries. Archaic synonyms like "Asiatic" or "Oriental" (from Latin oriens, "rising [sun]") persisted into the but fell into disuse due to connotations of or inferiority, particularly after mid-20th-century critiques of colonial-era racial classifications. In anthropological contexts, terms like "" (coined by Johann Blumenbach in 1795 to describe East Asian physical traits) were employed until discarded post-World War II for lacking empirical rigor and promoting pseudoscientific hierarchies. Terminological usage of "Asian people" varies significantly by region, shaped by immigration histories and demographic realities rather than uniform geographical fidelity. , "Asian American" emerged as a pan-ethnic identifier in 1968, coined by activists and Emma Gee during university strikes to consolidate East Asians (e.g., Chinese, Japanese, Korean), South Asians (e.g., Indian), and Southeast Asians (e.g., Filipino, Vietnamese) against shared exclusionary policies like the of 1882; West Asians (e.g., , Turks) are typically excluded, aligning with U.S. Census categories emphasizing non-European descent. This construct prioritizes political solidarity over strict continental boundaries, as evidenced by the 2020 U.S. Census grouping over 24 million individuals under "Asian" while separately categorizing Middle Eastern/North African origins. In contrast, British English usage of "Asian" predominantly signifies South Asian origins (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan), reflecting post-1947 Partition migration waves totaling over 1.5 million by 2001, with East Asians specified distinctly (e.g., "Chinese British"); this divergence stems from imperial ties to the , rendering broader "Asian" applications contextually ambiguous or imprecise. Canadian terminology mirrors the U.S. model but incorporates "South Asian" qualifiers, as per data from 2021 enumerating 2.6 million South Asians separately from 2.3 million East Asians, underscoring adaptive categorizations driven by multicultural policy rather than etymological purity. Such variations highlight how terminological imprecision can obscure genetic and cultural distinctions, with empirical studies showing greater intra-Asian diversity (e.g., 6% global genetic variance across Asian subgroups) than inter-continental averages.

Ethnic Diversity and Subgroups

East Asian Groups

The principal ethnic groups of East Asia are the Han Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, and Mongols, who collectively number over 1.5 billion individuals and dominate the populations of the region's core nation-states. These groups share certain genetic and cultural affinities traceable to ancient Northeast Asian migrations, though they exhibit distinct linguistic, historical, and societal developments shaped by geography and isolation. Han Chinese constitute the largest single ethnic group globally, comprising approximately 91.1% of China's population of 1.413 billion as of 2023 estimates, equating to roughly 1.29 billion people primarily concentrated in mainland China. Japanese form a highly homogeneous society, accounting for 97.5% of Japan's estimated 123 million residents in 2022, or about 120 million ethnic Japanese, with minimal admixture due to historical insularity. Koreans, nearly monolithic across the peninsula, make up over 99% of South Korea's 51.6 million population and a similar proportion of North Korea's approximately 26 million, totaling around 77 million ethnic Koreans. Mongols, centered in Mongolia and northern China, number about 10 million worldwide, including 3.4 million in Mongolia (where they form 95% of the populace) and roughly 6 million in China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Han Chinese trace their ethnogenesis to the Yellow River basin civilizations around 2000 BCE, evolving through dynastic assimilations that incorporated northern nomadic elements while maintaining a Sino-Tibetan linguistic core spoken by over 90% of the group today. Genetic studies indicate high homogeneity among Han subgroups, with Y-chromosome haplogroups O-M175 predominant at frequencies exceeding 50%, reflecting limited external gene flow compared to neighboring regions. Japanese ethnicity coalesced from Jōmon hunter-gatherers (circa 14,000 BCE) and Yayoi migrants from the continent around 300 BCE, resulting in a population with dual East Asian and ancient Paleolithic ancestries; modern Japanese exhibit mtDNA haplogroup D at 20-30%, underscoring this hybrid origin. Koreans descend from Neolithic populations in the Liao River region, with linguistic ties to Altaic isolates and genetic markers like haplogroup O2b covering 40-50% of paternal lineages, evidencing continuity despite invasions from Chinese and Mongol empires. Mongols emerged from steppe confederations unified under Genghis Khan in 1206 CE, retaining Turkic-Mongolic language branches and nomadic pastoralist traditions; their genome shows elevated frequencies of haplogroup C2 (up to 50% in Khalkha subgroup), linked to Bronze Age expansions across Eurasia. Smaller indigenous groups persist within these dominant populations, such as the Ainu of northern (estimated at under 25,000, with distinct Australoid-like traits and ) and Ryukyuans of Okinawa (1.3 million, culturally akin to Austronesian influences but genetically proximate to mainland Japanese). Manchu in , once rulers of the (1644-1912), number about 10 million but have largely assimilated linguistically into Han norms. These minorities highlight East Asia's relative ethnic uniformity compared to South or , with intergroup mixing rare due to endogamous practices and state policies favoring assimilation, as evidenced by China's 2020 census reporting 91.11% Han amid efforts to integrate 55 recognized minorities. Demographic pressures, including Japan's fertility rate of 1.3 births per woman (2023) and China's aging population post-one-child policy (ended 2016), pose challenges to sustaining these groups' cohesion amid urbanization rates exceeding 60% regionally.

South Asian Groups

The ethnic composition of South Asia is dominated by and Dravidian linguistic groups, reflecting millennia of migrations, linguistic evolution, and cultural intermixing, with forming the numerical majority across the region. groups, speakers of languages derived from ancient , predominate in northern, eastern, and western , encompassing subgroups such as , , Hindustani-speakers (including and variants), Marathis, Gujaratis, and others. These groups share historical ties to Vedic culture and subsequent developments under empires like the Maurya and Mughal, though genetic studies indicate a blend of ancient South Asian hunter-gatherer, Iranian farmer-related, and later pastoralist ancestries, with the latter more pronounced in northern populations. Bengalis, the largest single ethnic subgroup in , number roughly 250 million, primarily concentrated in where they constitute 98% of the 171 million recorded in 2023, and in India's state, home to about 100 million residents as of recent projections. Their , an Eastern Indo-Aryan tongue, evolved from forms around the CE, and the group is characterized by shared literary traditions like the Bengali Renaissance and agricultural adaptations to the Delta's flood-prone ecology. Punjabis, another major Indo-Aryan subgroup totaling approximately 150 million, are centered in Pakistan's Punjab province (population over 127 million, predominantly Punjabi-speaking) and India's Punjab state, with historical roots in the Indus Valley and influences from and shaping their social structures. Dravidian groups, concentrated in southern and parts of , include , Telugus, , and , with over 200 million speakers collectively; alone number about 77 million, mainly in (72 million population) and northern . Unlike , Dravidian tongues feature agglutinative grammar and retroflex consonants, with origins potentially linked to pre-Indo-Aryan substrates in the subcontinent, as evidenced by linguistic reconstructions and ancient inscriptions from the 3rd century BCE Ashokan edicts. These groups maintain distinct cultural practices, such as temple architecture in the Chola style and matrilineal elements among some communities, amid genetic profiles showing higher proportions of ancient South Asian ancestry compared to northern counterparts. Smaller but significant groups include Tibeto-Burman peoples in (e.g., Newars and Gurungs, about 20% of Nepal's 30 million population) and Austroasiatic speakers like Munda tribes in eastern , highlighting the region's layered demographic history.

Southeast Asian Groups

Southeast Asian ethnic groups exhibit significant linguistic and genetic heterogeneity, reflecting prehistoric expansions of hunter-gatherers, farmers, and later migrations. Genetic analyses indicate that contemporary populations derive substantial ancestry from Hoabinhian-related foragers indigenous to the region, admixed with components from ancient northern East Asian farmers and southern East Asian hunter-gatherers linked to Taiwanese aboriginals, with additional South Asian-related evident in mainland groups dating to around 2,000-4,000 years ago. This admixture pattern underscores the region's role as a demographic crossroads, where Austronesian speakers expanded maritime networks from circa 5,000 years ago, while Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic groups underwent inland dispersals influenced by rice agriculture and monsoon climates. , dominant in insular , encompass diverse subgroups across , the , , and , totaling hundreds of millions. The Javanese, the most populous Austronesian subgroup, comprise about 40% of 's , estimated at roughly 110 million individuals based on national census proportions applied to the 2023 of 278 million. Sundanese, another major Austronesian group concentrated in western , account for approximately 15% of 's populace, or around 42 million. In the , over 110 million people belong to various Austronesian ethnicities, including Tagalog and Cebuano speakers, who trace linguistic roots to proto-Austronesian migrations that facilitated island-hopping and seafaring adaptations. Malay populations, spanning , , and , number in the tens of millions and share cultural traits like wet-rice cultivation and animist-influenced traditions later overlaid with . On the mainland, Austroasiatic groups such as the Vietnamese (Kinh) predominate, forming 85.3% of Vietnam's 104.8 million residents as of 2023, equating to approximately 89 million people whose Austroasiatic language and genetics reflect ancient Yangtze River farming dispersals around 4,000 years ago. Khmer Cambodians, numbering about 16 million or 97% of Cambodia's population, exhibit similar Austroasiatic heritage tied to early Mon-Khmer expansions, with genetic continuity from populations in the . Smaller Austroasiatic communities, like the Mon in and , preserve distinct dialects and subsistence practices amid assimilation pressures. Tai-Kadai peoples, including the and Lao, expanded southward from southern between the 8th and 13th centuries CE, displacing or assimilating prior inhabitants through superior wet-rice technologies and centralized polities. Ethnic constitute the majority in , with around 60 million individuals comprising subgroups like Central Thai and (northeastern Thai with Lao affinities), based on the country's 71.7 million total population in 2023 where Tai speakers form over 80%. , closely related, total about 7 million in proper, with broader Tai groups like Shan in adding to a regional count exceeding 90 million. These migrations introduced tonal languages and Buddhism, shaping societal hierarchies evident in historical kingdoms like Ayutthaya and . Indigenous minorities, including Negrito foragers such as the in and Aeta in the , represent relict populations with deep regional ancestry predating major expansions, often numbering in the low hundreds of thousands and facing marginalization from land loss and demographic swamping. Sino-Tibetan hill tribes like the Karen (over 7 million across and ) and Hmong (about 4 million regionally) maintain highland swidden agriculture and clan-based social structures, with showing affinities to ancient Tibeto-Burman dispersals. This diversity persists despite 20th-century nation-state formations that privileged dominant ethnicities in censuses and policies, often undercounting minorities due to assimilation incentives.

Central and West Asian Groups

Central Asia encompasses the ethnic groups of , , , , and , where dominate alongside Iranian . The Turkic groups—, Kyrgyz, , and Turkmen—originate from eastern migrations beginning in the CE, which displaced or assimilated earlier Indo-Iranian populations through conquest and intermixing, as evidenced by genetic studies showing eastern Turkic admixture in modern Central Asians. form the largest group, comprising over 80% of 's population of approximately 36 million as of 2023, with their language spoken by an estimated 35-40 million across the region. , numbering around 19 million primarily in , maintain nomadic pastoral traditions adapted to semi-arid steppes. Kyrgyz, about 6.5 million strong and concentrated in , retain equestrian horse cultures tied to mountain terrains. Turkmen, roughly 7 million in and adjacent areas, speak a Turkic language and historically practiced transhumant herding. Tajiks, an Iranian ethnic group speaking a Persian dialect, constitute over 80% of Tajikistan's 10 million and trace descent from ancient Sogdians and Bactrians, preserving pre-Turkic Indo-Iranian linguistic and cultural elements despite Turkic overlays. Genetic analyses confirm Tajiks' continuity with Indo-Iranian speakers, with minimal Turkic genetic input compared to neighboring groups. Smaller minorities include (descendants of Soviet-era settlers, now under 4% regionally) and Uyghurs in border areas, reflecting layered migrations. West Asia, including the , , the , , and the , features Semitic as the predominant group, alongside Iranian and , and Turkic Turks and . , speakers of from the Afro-Asiatic family, number over 400 million across 22 countries, originating from tribes that expanded via Islamic conquests from the CE, unifying diverse pre-Islamic Semitic substrata under . , comprising about 51% of 's 89 million population, descend from ancient Indo-Iranian migrants arriving around 1000 BCE, developing Zoroastrian and later Islamic civilizations centered on Farsi, an Iranian language. Kurds, an Iranian people speaking Northwestern Iranian dialects, total around 30-40 million across , , , and , maintaining tribal confederacies and resisting assimilation due to geographic isolation in mountainous zones. Turkic groups like (over 80 million in ) and (24% of Iran's population, or about 20 million) stem from Oghuz migrations in the CE, blending with Anatolian and Caucasian locals to form Sunni-majority societies. Other minorities include (Indo-European speakers with ancient Christian roots) and Assyrians (Semitic Neo-Aramaic speakers preserving Mesopotamian heritage), each under 1-2% regionally but culturally distinct. This mosaic results from millennia of invasions, with genetic profiles reflecting Semitic, Iranian, and Turkic admixtures shaped by routes and empires rather than uniform origins.

Demographics and Population Dynamics

Global Population Statistics

Asia constitutes the most populous continent, with an estimated 4.84 billion inhabitants as of October 2025, accounting for approximately 60% of the global population of 8.1 billion. This figure encompasses residents of all 48 countries and territories in Asia, based on elaborations of United Nations demographic data that integrate census results, vital registration systems, and sample surveys. The continent's population growth rate has slowed to about 0.56% annually, reflecting declining fertility rates below replacement levels in many countries, though absolute numbers continue to rise due to population momentum. Projections indicate Asia's population will peak around mid-century before stabilizing or declining in some subregions.
SubregionPopulation (2024 estimate, millions)Share of Asia's population
Eastern Asia1,65634%
Southern Asia2,000+ (dominated by at 1.43 billion)41%
Southeastern Asia70014%
Western Asia3006%
802%
Northern Asia100 (primarily east of Urals)2%
Data compiled from UN World Population Prospects 2024 aggregates; subregional totals approximate due to overlapping definitions and ongoing revisions. The —ethnic Asians living outside the —adds tens of millions to the global total, though estimates vary widely owing to differences in ethnic self-identification, mixed ancestries, and migration patterns. International migrants originating from numbered about 121 million in 2024, with roughly 38% (around 46 million) residing outside , primarily in , , and ; however, this excludes second- and third-generation descendants. Significant communities include over 40 million , concentrated in , , and . Intra-Asian migration dominates, with 62% of Asian-origin migrants staying within the continent, complicating diaspora counts. Overall, the diaspora represents less than 2% of the global , underscoring Asia's role as the primary demographic reservoir.

Internal Migration and Urbanization

Internal migration within , primarily from rural to urban areas, encompasses approximately 282 million people, representing one-third of the global total of internal migrants. This movement is largely propelled by economic imperatives, such as the collapse of agrarian productivity and the allure of wage labor in expanding industrial and service sectors, rather than conflict or environmental displacement in most cases. Predominant flows occur in high-population nations like , , and , where rural surplus labor seeks integration into urban economies, often under temporary or circular arrangements that maintain ties to origin villages. In , rural-to-urban migration has been the dominant engine of since the 1978 economic reforms, converting an estimated 500–550 million rural residents into urban inhabitants by 2017. The migrant stock peaked at 291 million in 2017, comprising over 20% of the national and fueling manufacturing hubs in coastal provinces like . This process persists amid the system's restrictions, which deny full urban residency rights to many, resulting in persistent rural-urban divides in welfare access despite policy relaxations since 2014. By 2021, such migration accounted for the bulk of China's urban expansion, with over 145 million recorded as early as 2009. India exhibits comparable dynamics, with sustaining urban growth amid agricultural stagnation; the urban population hit 709 million in 2023, reflecting a 2.38% annual increase driven by rural inflows to metros like and Bengaluru. Southeast Asian countries, including and , mirror this, with subregional migrants numbering 23.6 million, a third remaining intraregionally to support rates averaging 54% in 2024. These patterns underscore causal links between rural —exacerbated by land fragmentation and —and urban labor demands, though they generate challenges like informal settlements and overburdened services. Asia's urbanization has accelerated accordingly, with and the Pacific reaching over 50% urban share by the early 2020s; China's urban residents alone numbered 923 million recently, exemplifying proliferation in places like . Regional growth rates vary, from near-100% in to under 30% in , but overall trends project continued rural exodus, potentially adding hundreds of millions to urban agglomerations by mid-century, contingent on infrastructure scaling and policy reforms to mitigate disparities.

Genetic and Health Metrics

Asian populations exhibit substantial , reflecting their vast geographic span and historical migrations from ancient Out-of-Africa dispersals, with distinct ancestries across subgroups: East Asians primarily trace to northern East Asian farmers with minimal West Eurasian admixture, while South Asians show a cline of Ancestral North Indian (ANI) and Ancestral South Indian (ASI) components, decreasing from northwest to southeast. Southeast Asians often carry archaic admixture at levels up to 5%, higher than in other non-African groups, influencing adaptations like high-altitude tolerance in Tibetans via EPAS1 variants. Central Asians display hybrid Eastern and Western Eurasian ancestries, as seen in Hui populations with balanced contributions from both. Genome-wide studies of over 9,000 individuals reveal clinically significant variants enriched in recessive disease genes, such as those for severe childhood conditions, with East Asians showing higher carrier frequencies for certain monogenic disorders compared to Europeans. Common genetic disorders vary by subgroup: hemoglobinopathies like alpha- and beta-thalassemia and are prevalent in Southeast Asians, with carrier rates exceeding 20% in some refugee populations, alongside (G6PD) deficiency affecting hemizygous males at 5-10%. In , carrier burdens for over 300 autosomal recessive and X-linked diseases highlight pathogenic alleles distinct from European profiles, including higher frequencies in genes like those for . Pharmacogenomic variants differ, with Asians showing reduced efficacy or increased toxicity for drugs like due to HLA-B*15:02 alleles prevalent in and Thai populations at 5-10%. Movement disorders such as manifest frequently, often with or at onset in 62.5% of Asian cases. Health metrics demonstrate subgroup disparities: East Asian countries like report life expectancies of 85.2 years as of 2021, driven by low ischemic heart disease and breast/ mortality rates below global averages. exhibit the highest U.S. life expectancy at around 86 years for females, surpassing other groups by over two decades in some comparisons, attributed partly to selective migration and dietary factors. South and Southeast Asians face elevated prevalence, up to 20% in urban Indians versus 10% globally, linked to thrifty gene hypotheses and rapid , though overall healthy life expectancy trails due to infectious disease burdens in lower-income areas. Cancer profiles show lower colorectal incidence in East Asians but higher nasopharyngeal rates tied to EBV and HLA variants.
SubgroupKey Genetic FeatureCommon Health Metric
East AsianHigh homogeneity; EPAS1 for hypoxiaLE ~84-85 years; low CVD mortality
South AsianANI-ASI admixture clineHigh prevalence (~20%)
Southeast Asian admixture; carriersG6PD deficiency (5-10%); variable LE

Historical Context

Prehistoric Migrations and Origins

Modern humans (Homo sapiens) originated in and began dispersing out of the continent approximately 70,000 to 60,000 years ago, with genetic and archaeological evidence indicating that early migrants followed a southern coastal route through the and into by around 65,000 years ago. These populations subsequently spread eastward into and northward into , reaching southern by about 60,000 years ago, as supported by analyses and fossil evidence from sites like Tianyuan Cave in , dated to approximately 40,000 years ago, which show continuity with modern East Asian lineages. In , from sites such as (dated 45,000–35,000 years ago) reveals a diverse founding population with affinities to both hunter-gatherers and later Austroasiatic speakers, indicating rapid adaptation to tropical environments and minimal early replacement by later waves. Genetic studies confirm that Asian populations carry archaic human admixture from Neanderthals and Denisovans, acquired during these early dispersals. Non-African Asians, like other Eurasians, possess 1–2% Neanderthal DNA from interbreeding events around 50,000–60,000 years ago in western Eurasia, with East Asians showing slightly elevated levels (up to 20% more than Europeans in some genomic segments) due to additional admixture or retention. Denisovan ancestry, from a to Neanderthals in , is more pronounced in East and Southeast Asians, with two distinct pulses contributing up to 0.1–0.5% on average in and higher in some island Southeast Asian groups (e.g., 3–5% in ), reflecting encounters in eastern after the initial out-of-Africa split. South Asians exhibit lower Denisovan signals but share Neanderthal , with no robust evidence for unique "ghost" archaic ancestries beyond these, countering some earlier claims of additional unknown sources. These migrations established the foundational genetic diversity of Asian peoples, with subsequent isolation by geography (e.g., , oceans) and climate (e.g., ~20,000 years ago) leading to regional divergences. For instance, ancient genomes from the River region show East Asian-specific s emerging ~40,000 years ago, while South Asian groups like the Andamanese preserve traces of an early coastal lineage predating major Eurasian back-migrations. Central Asian populations later incorporated West Eurasian elements via expansions, but their prehistoric cores trace to dispersals from southern routes, as evidenced by Y-chromosome C lineages widespread across to . This empirical framework from whole-genome sequencing underscores a single major out-of-Africa pulse as the primary origin, with archaic admixtures enhancing adaptive traits like immunity and high-altitude tolerance in specific subgroups.

Ancient Civilizations and Empires

In , the Sumerian civilization emerged around 4000 BCE in southern , marking one of the earliest urban societies with innovations in cuneiform writing, the wheel, and irrigation-based agriculture that supported city-states like and . These developments enabled to tens of thousands in urban centers and laid foundations for later Akkadian, Babylonian, and Assyrian empires, which by 2334 BCE under unified much of the region through military conquests and standardized administration. Mesopotamian achievements included the circa 1750 BCE, establishing codified laws influencing subsequent legal systems, though reliant on hierarchical priest-kings and slave labor. The Indus Valley Civilization, flourishing from approximately 3300 BCE to 1300 BCE in present-day and northwest , featured advanced urban planning in cities like and , with standardized brick construction, sophisticated drainage systems, and trade networks extending to . Covering over 1 million square kilometers at its peak around 2600–1900 BCE, it supported a population estimated at 5 million through and craftsmanship, evidenced by uniform weights and measures, yet its undeciphered script limits understanding of its governance and . Decline around 1900 BCE correlated with climate shifts and river course changes, leading to deurbanization without clear evidence of invasion. In , the ruled from circa 1600 BCE to 1046 BCE, confirmed by inscriptions at revealing a centralized bronze-working state with ritual divination, ancestor worship, and military campaigns using chariots. Succeeding the semi-legendary Xia, Shang kings controlled territories along the , producing advanced bronzeware for elite ceremonies and achieving early writing systems, though human sacrifice was practiced on a scale of hundreds per royal tomb. The , overthrowing Shang in 1046 BCE, expanded to cover much of northern China by 771 BCE, introducing the concept to legitimize rule through moral governance rather than divine descent, fostering feudal systems and iron technology that boosted agriculture and warfare. Zhou influence persisted until 256 BCE, shaping philosophical traditions amid fragmentation into warring states. Further west, the of Persia, founded by in 550 BCE, rapidly expanded to encompass 5.5 million square kilometers by 500 BCE, stretching from the Indus Valley to the Mediterranean through tolerant administration, satrapal provinces, and infrastructure like the Royal Road. Darius I's reforms around 522–486 BCE included standardized coinage, taxation, and Zoroastrian-influenced legal codes, enabling rule over diverse ethnic groups via relative religious freedom, contrasting with more coercive Mesopotamian precedents. In , the under Chandragupta from 321 BCE unified much of the subcontinent, reaching 5 million square kilometers under (r. 268–232 BCE), who promoted post-conquest while maintaining a vast and espionage network documented in Kautilya's . 's edicts, inscribed on pillars across , reflect a shift from expansionism to dhamma-based , though the empire fragmented after 185 BCE due to weak succession and regional revolts. These civilizations collectively demonstrate Asia's role in pioneering statecraft, , and trade, with empirical evidence from underscoring environmental and organizational factors in their rise and fall over millennia.

Colonial Era and 20th-Century Developments

The colonial era in , spanning roughly from the 16th to mid-20th centuries, saw European powers establish dominance over vast territories, profoundly affecting Asian populations through resource extraction, forced labor, and administrative restructuring. In , British rule under the Raj from 1858 to 1947 involved policies that prioritized cash crops like and , disrupting traditional and contributing to recurrent famines; the alone resulted in approximately 3 million deaths due to wartime grain requisitions, export priorities, and inadequate relief efforts amid colonial governance failures. Similar patterns emerged in , where Dutch control in and French administration in Indochina led to alongside economic exploitation, as colonial infrastructures facilitated export economies but often at the expense of local food security and autonomy. In , the (1839–1842 and 1856–1860) between Britain and Qing exemplified coercive trade practices, with British forces imposing unequal treaties that opened ports, legalized opium imports, and ceded territories like , leading to widespread addiction that destabilized social structures and drained silver reserves, weakening the dynasty and sparking internal rebellions. Japanese imperialism, emerging in the late , added an intra-Asian layer; after annexing in and Korea in 1910, Japan pursued expansionist policies that included and labor mobilization, affecting millions through cultural suppression and economic integration into its empire. The brought accelerated by , with Asian nations gaining independence amid nationalist movements and weakened European powers; and achieved sovereignty on August 15, 1947, followed by in 1948, in , and others by 1960, reshaping demographics through partitions and migrations, such as the 14 million displaced in the India-Pakistan divide. Wars and revolutions further transformed societies: Japan's invasion of in 1937 initiated conflicts causing tens of millions of deaths, while the culminated in the People's Republic's founding in , enforcing land reforms and collectivization that altered rural populations. Post-independence, economic shifts marked rapid industrialization in select regions, with Japan's post-1945 recovery and the "Asian Tigers" (, , , ) achieving high growth rates through export-oriented policies, boosting and but straining resources amid booms—from 1.4 billion in 1950 to over 3 billion by 2000. Conflicts like the (1950–1953) and (1955–1975) caused demographic losses and migrations, while communist regimes in and implemented policies leading to events like China's (1958–1962), which resulted in 15–55 million excess deaths from and related causes due to centralized planning failures. These developments fostered a transition from agrarian societies to modern economies, with varying impacts on health, education, and across Asia's diverse populations.

Cultural and Societal Features

Linguistic Diversity

Asia exhibits unparalleled linguistic diversity, with 2,307 living languages documented across the continent, surpassing any other and comprising about one-third of the global total of 7,159 languages. These languages are native to over 4.7 billion speakers, driven by factors such as vast geographic barriers, ancient population movements, and limited historical unification under single linguistic standards outside of imperial scripts like or Sanskrit-derived systems. This diversity contrasts sharply with speaker concentration, where a handful of languages—, , Bengali, and —account for the majority of native speakers due to demographic scales in , , , and the . The primary language families reflect regional concentrations: Sino-Tibetan, the most populous by speakers in East and parts of , includes with approximately 939 million native speakers and Burmese with 33 million. Indo-European dominates via Indo-Aryan branches (e.g., Hindi-Urdu with over 600 million total speakers) and extends to in West and (e.g., Persian with 77 million). Austronesian, prevalent in and island nations, features Malay-Indonesian (over 300 million speakers) and like Tagalog. Dravidian languages, unrelated to Indo-European, are confined to southern and , with Tamil spoken by 86 million. Turkic spans and western regions, including Turkish (88 million speakers) and Uyghur. Smaller but influential families include Austroasiatic (e.g., Vietnamese, 85 million speakers; Khmer), Tai-Kadai (e.g., Thai, 61 million), and isolates or micro-families like Japonic (Japanese, 123 million) and Koreanic (Korean, 81 million). West and Southwest Asia incorporate Afroasiatic , notably with 373 million native speakers across the and , alongside Indo-European holdouts. Central Asia features Mongolic (e.g., Mongolian, 5.2 million) amid Turkic dominance. This fragmentation persists despite lingua francas like Mandarin in or in northern , with often low even within families due to tonal systems, agglutinative morphologies, or script variations (e.g., for Indo-Aryan vs. for Persian). Many minority languages face endangerment from urbanization and national standardization policies, with classifying 44% of global languages as vulnerable, a trend amplified in Asia's highlands and islands.

Religious Composition

Asia's religious landscape is characterized by profound diversity, as the continent is the origin of , , , , , , Shintoism, and , while also hosting the world's largest populations of and significant Christian, Jewish, and adherents. Empirical data from censuses and surveys indicate that is common, particularly in , where individuals often participate in multiple traditions without exclusive affiliation, and state policies in countries like promote , contributing to high unaffiliated rates. According to estimates for the region in 2020—which encompasses over 99% of Asia's approximately 4.7 billion people—the religiously unaffiliated form the single largest category at 32% (about 1.5 billion people), followed closely by and each at roughly 25-27% (1.2 billion adherents per group). Buddhists comprise 7% (316 million), concentrated in East and Southeast Asia, while Christians account for 6% (269 million), with growth driven by conversions and higher fertility in places like the Philippines and South Korea. Folk religions, including Chinese traditional practices and animist traditions, represent smaller but widespread shares, often overlapping with other categories; for instance, in China, 21% identify with folk religions alongside 52% unaffiliated and 18% Buddhist affiliations. Jews number under 1% globally but have historical roots in West Asia, primarily in Israel (classified variably in regional data). Other groups like Sikhs (25-30 million, mostly in India) and Jains (under 5 million) remain regionally confined.
Religious GroupApproximate SharePopulation (millions, 2020)
Unaffiliated32%1,500
Hindu27%1,200
Muslim25%1,200
Buddhist7%316
Christian6%269
Other (folk, etc.)3%~140
These figures derive from aggregated and survey data, with unaffiliated rates potentially understating ritual participation due to self-identification biases in secular contexts. Regional disparities underscore causal factors like historical diffusion, conquests, and demographics: features Hindu majorities in (79% Hindu, over 1 billion) and Muslim majorities in (96%) and (91%); includes the world's largest Muslim population in (87%, 230 million), Buddhist majorities in (95%) and (97%), and Christian dominance in the (90%+); shows low affiliation overall, with at 60%+ unaffiliated and syncretic Shinto-Buddhist practices; Central and are nearly uniformly Muslim (90%+ in countries like , , and ). Between 2010 and 2020, Muslim and Hindu populations grew fastest (16% and 12%, respectively) due to higher rates (averaging 2.9 children per woman for vs. global 2.3), while Buddhists declined slightly in absolute numbers amid aging populations and low in adherent-heavy nations.

Family Structures and Social Norms

Extended family structures predominate across much of , with nearly half of the population residing in households that include multiple generations or non-nuclear relatives, contrasting sharply with nuclear family norms in where only about 10% live in extended arrangements. In , 54% of households are extended, while in the figure stands at 44%, driven by economic interdependence and cultural expectations of intergenerational support. At least 40% of Asians live with extended kin, facilitating shared childcare and elder care amid rapid . Filial piety, a Confucian-derived norm emphasizing children's obligations to respect and support parents, remains entrenched in East and Southeast Asian societies, manifesting in high rates of intergenerational co-residence even as declines. In these regions, adult children often provide financial and instrumental aid to aging parents, with surveys indicating stronger endorsement of such duties compared to Western ; for instance, only 7% of elderly in reside in homes, subsidized by family rather than state systems. Collectivist orientations prioritize family harmony and hierarchy over personal , influencing decisions on , , and to uphold group welfare. Arranged marriages persist in , particularly , where family involvement in spouse selection aligns with and economic considerations, though prevalence has declined from near-universal to around 50-60% in rural areas as of recent surveys, with urban youth favoring "love-cum-arranged" hybrids. In , prevalence has stabilized at 20-40% since the 1970s, supporting joint decision-making and resource pooling. —where brides join husbands' families—reinforces these norms, correlating with lower female in cross-national data from Demographic Health Surveys across . Gender roles exhibit patriarchal patterns, with men positioned as primary breadwinners and heads, while women shoulder disproportionate domestic and childcare burdens, evident in East Asia's low rates tied to women's "double shift" despite workforce participation. preference persists, contributing to rising sonless families from levels, as favors male heirs for elder care continuity. highlight stricter controls on women's social activities and mobility in Asian contexts, perpetuating segregation and early risks. Urbanization and economic pressures are eroding traditional forms, with East Asian rates climbing to 1.8-2.4 per 1,000 and numbers dropping sharply—e.g., China's first marriages fell 41% from 2013 to 2019—yet core norms like filial obligation endure due to state-limited welfare and cultural resilience. In and , joint families buffer against modernization's disruptions, maintaining higher co-residence than global averages. These structures foster social stability but constrain individual agency, particularly for women, as evidenced by persistent attitude divergences in support.

Achievements and Criticisms

Economic and Educational Attainments

Asian populations demonstrate elevated educational outcomes relative to global averages, particularly among East Asian groups and skilled migrants. In the 2022 (PISA), administered by the , achieved the highest scores worldwide in (575), (561), and reading (543), followed closely by other East Asian entities such as Macao (China) in (552) and (536 in ). and also ranked in the top tier across subjects, with scores exceeding the average of 472 in by over 70 points in each case, reflecting systemic emphases on rigorous academic preparation and long study hours. These results contrast with lower performances in South and Southeast Asian nations like (366 in ) and the (not participating but historically low), underscoring regional disparities driven by institutional quality and cultural priorities rather than innate factors alone. Among Asian in the United States, remains exceptionally high, with 56% of adults aged 25 and older holding a or higher as of 2021 data, compared to 40% for the overall . Subgroup variations are pronounced: attain graduate or professional degrees at rates near 80%, while reach 85% for or higher, often attributable to selective immigration policies favoring skilled workers since the 1965 Immigration Act. Similar patterns hold in and , where Asian immigrants overrepresent in university enrollment, though data aggregation masks underperformance among less-selected refugees from . Economically, these educational advantages translate into superior outcomes, particularly in high-skill sectors. Asian American households reported a median income of $112,800 in 2023, the highest among U.S. racial groups and 40% above the national median of $80,610, sustained despite minor fluctuations from pandemic effects. Indian Americans lead subgroups with medians exceeding $150,000, fueled by concentrations in technology and medicine, while East Asian groups like Chinese and Korean Americans average over $100,000 through and professional occupations. rates are elevated, with Asian Americans owning 2.9 million businesses as of 2022—10% of the workforce self-employment rate—and generating $1.2 trillion in annual receipts, though many operate as non-employers in retail and services. In Asia proper, economic attainments vary widely by nation: Singapore's GDP per capita reached an estimated $93,956 in 2025, rivaling advanced economies, while Japan and South Korea exceeded $40,000, propelled by export-oriented manufacturing and innovation hubs. Conversely, populous South Asian countries like India ($2,900) and Bangladesh lag, with growth reliant on low-wage labor rather than per-capita productivity, highlighting how institutional reforms and human capital investment—rather than population size—drive prosperity in high-attaining Asian economies. These disparities affirm that cultural norms favoring diligence and delayed gratification, as observed in Confucian-influenced societies, correlate with sustained economic edges, independent of Western aid narratives.

Innovations and Contributions to Science

Ancient civilizations in developed several foundational technologies that facilitated scientific and technological progress worldwide. , attributed to around 105 AD during the , replaced cumbersome materials like bamboo and silk, enabling widespread knowledge dissemination. emerged by the AD, with evidence from the , allowing efficient reproduction of texts and diagrams essential for scientific treatises. , discovered in the 9th century AD through alchemical experiments documented in the military text of 1044 AD, revolutionized chemistry and physics applications in propulsion and explosives. The magnetic compass, initially for divination in the 2nd century BC but adapted for by the around 960–1279 AD, advanced maritime exploration and geophysical understanding. In the Indian subcontinent, mathematical innovations laid groundwork for algebra, arithmetic, and astronomy. The decimal place-value system appeared in Vedic texts by 1200 BC, evolving into Brahmi numerals by the 3rd century BC, which influenced the modern Hindu-Arabic numerals. The concept of zero as a numeral originated in India, with the earliest evidence in the Bakhshali manuscript dated to the 3rd–4th century AD via carbon dating, transitioning from placeholder to operational number in calculations. Brahmagupta's 7th-century Brahmasphutasiddhanta formalized quadratic equation solutions and square root computations, while introducing rules for negative numbers, such as treating them as debts with arithmetic operations like subtracting a negative equaling addition. Trigonometric functions, including sine, were defined by the 6th century, and precursors to calculus, like infinite series for pi, emerged in the Kerala school by the 14th century with Madhava's work. Japanese scientists have excelled in physics and , particularly post-World War II. Hideki Yukawa received the 1949 Nobel Prize in Physics for predicting the particle, the first Japanese . Subsequent awards include the 2014 Nobel in Physics to Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano, and Shuji Nakamura for blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs), enabling efficient lighting and displays that reduced global energy consumption in . Japan's innovations extend to , with the bullet train launched in 1964, achieving speeds over 200 km/h and influencing worldwide through aerodynamic and safety advancements. Contemporary contributions reflect Asia's rising R&D investment. China led global scientific publication growth, producing over 1 million peer-reviewed articles in 2023, surpassing the U.S. in volume due to state-driven priorities in AI, , and . R&D expenditure in grew 8.7% in recent years, reaching intensities comparable to advanced economies, funding breakthroughs like Tu Youyou's 2015 Nobel-winning for treatment, derived from traditional herbal analysis. contributes in space science, with Chandrayaan-3's 2023 lunar landing demonstrating precise propulsion and rover technology. and maintain high R&D-to-GDP ratios above 4%, driving and patents. These outputs stem from empirical institutional investments rather than inherent traits, though cultural emphases on education correlate with outcomes in patent filings, where East Asian countries filed over 60% of global triadic patents in 2022.

Critiques of Cultural Practices

Certain traditional practices in South Asian societies, such as the caste system, have drawn international criticism for entrenching social hierarchies that result in systemic and violence against lower castes, particularly Dalits. reports that 's caste system, rooted in , enforces and segregation, denying Dalits access to , , and public spaces, with thousands of atrocities reported annually despite legal prohibitions. The has estimated that at least 250 million people worldwide, predominantly in , face dehumanizing caste-based , including forced labor and exclusion from religious sites. Enforcement remains weak, as evidenced by ongoing failures to implement anti- laws, leading to persistent economic marginalization where Dalits comprise a disproportionate share of 's poorest populations. Honor killings, prevalent in parts of including and , represent another practice condemned for prioritizing family reputation over individual rights, often targeting women for perceived violations of or inter-caste relationships. In , such killings are estimated to number in the thousands annually, with perpetrators frequently including family members acting to restore "honor." A study across and documented hundreds of cases tied to cultural norms sanctioning who defy arranged marriages or elope, with low conviction rates due to community complicity and lenient legal frameworks. Critics, including organizations, argue these acts constitute gender-based violence enabled by patriarchal structures, with empirical data showing victims disproportionately young females subjected to or acid attacks. Dowry-related deaths in India highlight critiques of marriage customs that commodify women, where demands for payments from the bride's family lead to harassment, suicides, or murders disguised as accidents. data indicate approximately 7,000 dowry deaths reported yearly, with 13,479 violations of dowry prohibition laws in 2022 alone, often involving within the first few years of marriage. Investigations are protracted, with conviction rates below 30% due to evidentiary challenges and familial pressures, exacerbating underreporting and perpetuating the cycle. These practices are linked to broader economic incentives, where escalates with groom's status, correlating with higher female mortality rates in high-prevalence districts. Child marriage persists in South Asia, criticized for curtailing girls' autonomy and increasing health risks, with UNICEF estimating one in four young women married before age 18, accounting for 40% of the global burden. In countries like and , prevalence exceeds 50% in rural areas, associated with higher rates of , early pregnancy complications, and educational dropout, limiting economic independence. Legal minimum ages are often flouted due to cultural norms viewing early unions as poverty mitigators, though evidence shows long-term societal costs including intergenerational poverty. In , female genital cutting (FGC) in and has faced scrutiny for inflicting physical and psychological harm under the guise of religious or cultural purity, affecting over 90% of Muslim girls in some communities despite lacking scriptural basis in . The classifies FGC as a violation causing immediate complications like hemorrhage and long-term issues such as , with prevalence driven by social rather than health benefits. groups note increasing by health workers, which normalizes the practice but does not mitigate risks, prompting calls for legal bans amid resistance from traditionalists. These critiques emphasize empirical harms over cultural defenses, as studies link FGC to heightened vulnerability to infections and obstetric trauma. Broader analyses frame these practices as harmful traditions conflicting with universal human rights, with UN reports using frameworks to assess in , rejecting relativism where social acceptance excuses physical harm. While some invoke "" to defend communal priorities, data on elevated mortality and inequality underscore causal links to restricted agency. Internal reformers and voices increasingly challenge persistence, citing failures in legal enforcement as key barriers to eradication.

Diaspora and Global Perceptions

Major Diaspora Populations

The hosts the largest absolute Asian diaspora population, estimated at 24.8 million in 2023, representing 7% of the national total and more than doubling from 11.9 million in 2000. This growth stems primarily from , with major subgroups including (largest at over 4.4 million in 2020), , , , and . alone accounted for 7.1 million Asians in 2023, the highest of any state. In , individuals reporting Asian origins numbered 7.0 million in the 2021 census, comprising 19.3% of the and marking Asians as the third-largest ethnic group after European and Indigenous origins. South Asians form the largest subgroup at 2.57 million (35.1% of ), followed by East Asians (Chinese predominant) and Southeast Asians; over two-thirds are immigrants or recent descendants. hosts 50.9% of this , with a median age of 34.4 years. Australia's Asian diaspora is significant relative to its size, with overseas-born residents from contributing to 29.1% of the total in , though ancestry-based figures indicate around 17% identifying with non-Middle Eastern Asian origins. Chinese-born individuals numbered 549,618 (second-largest immigrant group after those from ), alongside substantial Indian, Filipino, and Vietnamese communities; the total reached 25.4 million that year. In the , the Asian ethnic group (primarily South Asian) totaled 5.5 million in per the 2021 census, equating to 9.3% of that regional population, with Indians at 1.9 million and at 1.6 million as leading subgroups. Across , smaller but notable communities include Chinese immigrants (at least 1.2 million continent-wide in 2021) and Indians, concentrated in countries like , , and , often driven by labor migration and rather than colonial ties.
Country/RegionAsian Population% of Total PopulationYearPrimary Subgroups
24.8 million7%2023Indian, Chinese, Filipino
7.0 million19.3%2021South Asian, Chinese
~4.3 million (ancestry)~17%2021Chinese, Indian, Filipino
England & Wales5.5 million9.3%2021Indian, Pakistani
These populations reflect selective migration patterns favoring skilled workers and family chains, with variations in ethnic categorization—e.g., U.S. and Canadian emphasize East and South n distinctions, while statistics group South Asians prominently under "Asian."

Regional Variations in Term "Asian"

In English-speaking countries outside , the term "Asian" applied to people varies by , influenced by colonial histories, patterns, and official classifications, often leading to mismatches between definitions and colloquial usage. In the , the Office for National Statistics (ONS) classifies "Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh" to include Indian (2.0 million people in 2021), Pakistani (1.6 million), Bangladeshi (0.7 million), Chinese (0.4 million), and other Asian backgrounds (1.0 million), totaling 5.4 million or 9.6% of the population. However, in common parlance and media, "Asian" typically denotes South Asians from the , excluding East Asians like Chinese, who are often distinguished separately due to differing cultural and migration profiles. In the United States, the Census Bureau defines "Asian" as individuals with origins in the (e.g., , , Korea), (e.g., , ), or the (e.g., ), encompassing 24.8 million people or about 7.5% of the as of 2023 estimates. Colloquial usage, however, frequently prioritizes East and Southeast Asians, reflecting early 20th-century immigration waves and , while South Asians may self-identify separately or face partial exclusion in popular narratives. This broad official scope contrasts with narrower perceptions, as evidenced by the inclusion of diverse subgroups in federal data but emphasis on "model minority" traits associated with East Asians. Australia's (ABS) employs the Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups, dividing Asian ancestries into North-East Asian (e.g., Chinese, Japanese; 1.4 million in 2021), South-East Asian (e.g., Vietnamese, Filipino; 1.0 million), and Southern and Central Asian (e.g., Indian, Pakistani; 1.0 million), contributing to 17.4% of the population claiming Asian ancestry. The term "Asian Australian" aggregates these without a single checkbox, but public usage aligns closely with the U.S. model, highlighting East and Southeast Asians amid post-1970s and skilled migration from those regions. In Canada, avoids a unified "Asian" category in its Census, instead detailing visible minority groups such as Asian (2.6 million), Chinese (1.7 million), Filipino (0.9 million), and other Southeast/West Asians, totaling over 6 million or about 20% of the population when broadly grouped. Common discourse mirrors U.S. and Australian patterns, encompassing East, Southeast, and Asians, though Asians are statistically prominent due to early 20th-century Punjabi migration and recent Indian inflows. These variations can cause cross-regional misunderstandings, such as British references to "Asian grooming gangs" implying Asians, while American contexts evoke East Asian imagery. Migration from Asia to Western destinations has shown steady growth in recent decades, with skilled and as primary drivers. In the , the Asian immigrant reached 14.6 million in 2023, comprising 31 percent of the total foreign-born and nearly doubling since 2000, with top origins including (2.9 million), (2.4 million), and the (2.1 million). Entry pathways emphasize high-skilled visas, such as H-1B approvals where 72 percent went to Indians and 12 percent to Chinese nationals in 2023, alongside 861,000 Asian international students in 2023-24. In , 62 percent of the 1.3 million immigrants arriving from 2016 to 2021 originated from , predominantly South , reflecting a shift toward temporary-to-permanent transitions amid high overall intake targets of 395,000 permanent residents annually. recorded 655,790 -born residents by June 2023, a 51.7 percent increase from 2013, with and among top sources contributing to net overseas migration of 446,000 in 2023-24, down from peaks due to policy adjustments. Across , Asian migrants numbered approximately 23 million in 2020, up from 20 million in 2015, fueled by labor demands despite irregular routes involving networks. Challenges include policy tightening and integration barriers amid rising public concerns over capacity strains. In , surveys in late 2024 showed nearly 60 percent of respondents viewing newcomer levels as excessive for the first time since 2000, prompting reductions in temporary worker and student permits to address and service pressures. Migrant workers, including many Asians under temporary programs, face documented abuses such as exploitation and . In the , about half of working immigrants report workplace , compounded by anti-Asian incidents post-2020 linked to origins narratives. grapples with irregular Asian inflows amid in origin countries, while geopolitical tensions, particularly -China relations, scrutinize Chinese migrants for security risks, potentially curbing flows. These factors, alongside cultural adjustment and strains among East Asian groups, underscore causal pressures from destination labor needs against origin economic disparities and host societal limits.

Controversies and Debates

Model Minority Stereotype: Empirical Basis

The model minority stereotype portrays Asian Americans as a group characterized by high , economic success, low rates, stable family structures, and minimal involvement in crime, often contrasted with other minority groups. This perception emerged prominently in the 1966 New York Times Magazine article "Success Story of One Minority Group in U.S.," which highlighted Japanese American achievements despite , attributing them to cultural emphasis on hard work and . Empirical data from U.S. Census Bureau and analyses largely substantiate aggregate trends supporting these traits among as a whole, though with significant subgroup variations that the often overlooks. In educational attainment, 56% of Asian adults aged 25 and older held a or higher in recent data, compared to 41.8% of the overall U.S. population. This figure varies by origin: reach 79%, while Cambodian and are closer to 20-30%, reflecting selective patterns favoring skilled workers from certain countries. Asian American postsecondary enrollment rates also exceed national averages, with over 60% of young adults pursuing higher education in some cohorts. Economically, Asian American households reported a of $112,800 in 2023, the highest among major racial groups and surpassing the U.S. median of approximately $75,000. rates stand at about 10% overall, lower than the national 11.5% but elevated for subgroups like Burmese (19%) and Hmong (17%) Americans, often recent refugees with lower English proficiency and education levels. These outcomes correlate with high labor force participation and concentration in high-skill sectors like and , bolstered by visa programs such as H-1B that prioritize educated immigrants. Family stability metrics further align with the stereotype, as Asian American households exhibit lower rates (around 10-15% lifetime) and higher two-parent family prevalence (85-90%) compared to U.S. averages of 40-50% for and 65% for two-parent homes. Incarceration and involvement remain low: Asian Americans, comprising 6-7% of the , accounted for only 1.3% of arrests in 2019 FBI data, with victimization rates at about 5 per 1,000 persons aged 12 and older from 2002-2006, far below national figures. These patterns hold despite controlling for socioeconomic factors in some studies, suggesting cultural factors like strong familial obligations contribute, though aggregate success masks intra-group disparities driven by recency of and regional origins.

Racial Lumping and Identity Politics

The practice of racial lumping groups heterogeneous populations from —spanning over 48 countries, thousands of ethnicities, and diverse languages and religions—into a singular "Asian" category, particularly in Western censuses and policy frameworks. This aggregation originated from historical processes like U.S. exclusions that treated all East and South Asians similarly, fostering panethnic identities for political mobilization despite underlying differences. In the U.S., the Census Bureau's Asian category encompasses origins from (e.g., , ), (e.g., ), (e.g., , ), and others, obscuring subgroup variations in outcomes and needs. Socioeconomic disparities within this lumped category are stark, complicating uniform narratives. In 2019, Indian American households had a of $119,000, exceeding the national median, while reported $36,000 and Hmong $68,000, with rates for some n subgroups surpassing 20%. follows suit: over 75% of Taiwanese and hold bachelor's degrees, compared to under 20% for Cambodian and . These gaps arise from differing selection—skilled visas favoring Indians and Taiwanese versus refugee flows from post-1975—yet lumping averages them into a "" profile that misrepresents vulnerabilities. In , racial lumping promotes pan-Asian coalitions for advocacy, as seen in responses to , but it erodes when subgroup interests diverge, such as geopolitical tensions between Chinese and Indian Americans or varying stances. Politically, aggregated data fuels debates, like using high Asian admissions to challenge race-based policies at , ignoring lower-performing subgroups' potential benefits from disaggregation. Exclusion from broader (DEI) narratives often stems from this success myth, with Asians viewed as outliers rather than facing ongoing barriers; 57% of Asian adults in 2023 identified as a major issue, yet responses rarely disaggregate to address subgroup-specific inequities like higher among . Critics argue that uncritical reliance on lumped categories in academia and media—often biased toward oversimplified equity frames—perpetuates ineffective policies, as evidenced by health disparities hidden in aggregated , where Southeast Asians show higher rates than East Asians. Disaggregation efforts, mandated in some states like since 2016 for public , reveal these fissures, enabling targeted interventions but challenging panethnic solidarity. Empirical analysis thus underscores that while lumping aids against external , it distorts causal understandings of , prioritizing political expediency over granular truth.

Discrimination and Geopolitical Tensions

The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, signed into law on May 6 by President Chester A. Arthur, suspended immigration of Chinese laborers for ten years and barred Chinese residents from naturalization, marking the first U.S. federal law to restrict immigration based on nationality. This legislation stemmed from economic competition fears among American workers and cultural prejudices, leading to widespread deportation threats and violence against Chinese communities. During , , issued by President on February 19, 1942, authorized the forced relocation and incarceration of approximately 120,000 , two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens, into ten inland camps without . These individuals lost homes, businesses, and possessions amid unsubstantiated fears of following the attack, with camps operating until 1945. Following the , 2001 attacks, South Asians, , and those perceived as faced heightened discrimination, including a surge in hate crimes and under expanded measures. The U.S. Department of Justice reported prosecuting bias incidents targeting these groups, yet community reports indicated persistent backlash, with South Asians often conflated with or in public hostility. Anti-Asian hate crimes in the U.S. spiked during the , with FBI data showing incidents nearly three times higher than pre-2020 averages by 2023, linked to associations with 's outbreak origin. A survey found widespread reports of verbal harassment and avoidance of , exacerbated by political rhetoric labeling the virus as "China virus." Geopolitical frictions between the U.S. and have amplified against , particularly those of Chinese descent, with 65% of in a 2024 survey attributing negative treatment to bilateral tensions. Studies indicate that of in U.S. fosters , increasing workplace bias and for East Asians amid trade wars and technology restrictions since 2018. Similarly, India- border clashes, such as the deadly 2020 Galwan Valley incident, have indirectly strained relations, though empirical data on direct effects remains limited compared to U.S.- dynamics. In and , analogous patterns emerge, with anti-Asian incidents rising during the and tied to perceptions of economic competition from Asian , though official statistics underreport due to definitional variances in tracking. These tensions highlight causal links between state-level rivalries and individual-level , where narratives influence domestic ethnic targeting independent of personal conduct.

References

  1. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/asia-population/
  2. https://www.facebook.com/seastats/posts/asia-a-rich-mosaic-of-diverse-ethnic-and-ethnolinguistic-groups-each-contributin/613358944369294/
  3. https://www.britannica.com/place/Asia/Ethnic-groups
  4. http://spice.fsi.stanford.edu/docs/the_shang_dynasty_1600_to_1050_bce
  5. https://www.utc.edu/health-education-and-professional-studies/asia-program/2018-ncta-teaching-modules/song-dynasty
  6. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/main_pop/kpct/kp_1000-1450ce.htm
  7. https://www.ijhsss.com/files/16.-Vahid-Rashidvash_0kprz5q3.pdf
  8. https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/caet20
  9. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/archaeologists-uncover-earliest-evidence-of-modern-humans-found-in-southeast-asia-180982377/
  10. https://hms.harvard.edu/news/dna-study-suggests-asia-was-settled-multiple-waves-migration
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982209020673
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2435565/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6822619/
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1673852721001703
  15. https://magazine.richmond.edu/article/-/19496/ancient-dna-is-revealing-the-genetic-landscape-of-people-who-first-settled-east-asia.html
  16. https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2024-11-04/ty-article-magazine/israeli-tajik-archaeologists-prove-early-human-presence-in-central-asia/00000192-f6c9-d9d0-a996-f7edbbdc0000
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1288383/
  18. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2007.2028
  19. https://bmcgenomdata.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2156-10-49
  20. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090831212951.htm
  21. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41431-019-0466-6
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10706-x
  23. https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/
  24. https://viva.pressbooks.pub/introtoanthropology4field/chapter/chapter-17-ethnicity-and-race/
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17435347/
  26. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Asia
  27. https://www.mapquest.com/travel/where-did-asia-get-its-name/
  28. https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Asia.html
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5562114/
  30. https://time.com/5837805/asian-american-history/
  31. https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2023/05/08/diverse-cultures-and-shared-experiences-shape-asian-american-identities/
  32. https://www.csusm.edu/ccc/programs/diaspora.html
  33. https://theodora.com/world_fact_book_2024/japan/japan_people.html
  34. https://study.com/academy/lesson/south-korea-ethnic-groups.html
  35. http://english.scio.gov.cn/chinafacts/2017-04/17/content_40636573.htm
  36. https://hereditasjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41065-020-00162-w
  37. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202105/t20210510_1817185.html
  38. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/japan/
  39. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/bangladesh-population/
  40. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=BD
  41. https://www.citypopulation.de/en/india/cities/westbengal/
  42. https://www.sci.news/othersciences/anthropology/southeast-asians-ancestry-four-ancient-populations-06196.html
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8853555/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7381617/
  45. https://www.indonesia-investments.com/culture/population/item67
  46. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/thailand-population/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3021592/
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3025785/
  49. https://www.britannica.com/place/Uzbekistan/People
  50. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-04144-4
  51. https://www.britannica.com/place/Iran/People
  52. https://study.com/academy/lesson/iranian-ethnic-groups.html
  53. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/globalconnections/mideast/themes/culture/
  54. https://education.cfr.org/learn/learning-journey/middle-east-and-north-africa-essentials/people-and-society-middle-east-and-north-africa
  55. https://worldpopulationreview.com/continents/asia
  56. https://population.un.org/wpp/
  57. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/eastern-asia-population/
  58. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrants-asia-united-states
  59. https://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/index.php?chinese-diaspora
  60. https://worldmigrationreport.iom.int/what-we-do/world-migration-report-2024-chapter-3/asia
  61. https://www.migrantresilience.org/internal-migration-in-asia.pdf
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441730.2024.2363024
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2226585623000936
  64. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7307
  65. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2022/10/2022-Ren-UN-memo-V2-Sep-12.pdf
  66. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/chinas-young-rural-urban-migrants-search-fortune-happiness-and-independence
  67. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/sas/south-asia/urban-population
  68. https://www.migrationdataportal.org/regional-data-overview/south-eastern-asia
  69. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/Percent_urban_population/South-East-Asia/
  70. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL?locations=Z4
  71. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?locations=Z4
  72. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/36/8/1628/5364274
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867421006358
  74. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/42/10/msaf225/8275192
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-34116-9
  76. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3985004/
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10440320/
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7485947/
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10272919/
  80. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667%2825%2900044-1/fulltext
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-020-0677-5
  82. https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/newsroom/news-releases/first-its-kind-analysis-us-national-data-reveals-significant
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11532511/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2687770/
  85. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aat3628
  86. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1108181108
  87. https://newsroom.uw.edu/news-releases/two-pulses-denisovans-contributed-east-asian-ancestry
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6433599/
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982222009022
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4864120/
  91. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/world-history/world-history-beginnings/ancient-mesopotamia/a/mesopotamia-article
  92. https://www.history.com/articles/sumerians-inventions-mesopotamia
  93. https://www.thoughtco.com/indus-civilization-timeline-and-description-171389
  94. https://pressbooks.pub/abriefhistory1/chapter/chapter-10-the-indus-valley-civilizations/
  95. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/timelines/southasia_timeline.htm
  96. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/shang-and-zhou-dynasties-the-bronze-age-of-china
  97. https://www.studentsofhistory.com/the-dynasties-of-ancient-china
  98. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/persian-empire/
  99. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/mauryan-empire/
  100. https://www.britannica.com/place/Mauryan-Empire
  101. https://newint.org/features/2021/12/07/feature-how-british-colonizers-caused-bengal-famine
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9735018/
  103. https://historyhub.info/relevance-of-colonialism-in-southeast-asia/
  104. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1830-1860/china-1
  105. https://asiapacificcurriculum.ca/learning-module/opium-wars-china
  106. https://japansociety.org/news/imperial-japan-1894-1945/
  107. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/asia-and-africa
  108. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/britain-and-decolonisation-in-south-east-and-south-asia-1945-1948
  109. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/main_pop/kpct/kp_1900-1950.htm
  110. https://academic.oup.com/book/32299/chapter/268520514
  111. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/asia-in-the-twentieth-century/
  112. https://www.ethnologue.com/insights/continents-most-indigenous-languages/
  113. https://www.ethnologue.com/insights/how-many-languages/
  114. https://www.ethnologue.com/
  115. https://www.ethnologue.com/insights/most-spoken-language/
  116. https://cooljugator.com/blog/most-spoken-languages-in-asia/
  117. https://tprteaching.weebly.com/blog/25-top-languages-spoken-in-asia
  118. https://www.east-localize.com/en/languages/asian-languages
  119. https://ohiostate.pressbooks.pub/eastasiaviathehumanities/chapter/module-4-languages-of-east-asia/
  120. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-the-worlds-most-spoken-languages-in-2025/
  121. https://blog.rosettastone.com/how-many-languages-are-there/
  122. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/06/09/religion-in-asia-and-the-pacific/
  123. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/feature/religious-composition-by-country-2010-2020/
  124. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/06/PR_2025.06.09_global-religious-change_report.pdf
  125. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/06/09/factors-driving-religious-change-2010-2020/
  126. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/03/31/with-billions-confined-to-their-homes-worldwide-which-living-arrangements-are-most-common/
  127. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2019/12/12/household-patterns-by-region/
  128. https://www.childtrends.org/publications/what-sets-families-in-asia-apart
  129. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786609/pdf
  130. https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/56a85076-50b9-49cd-a747-fe8e3f395b0b/content
  131. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4794&context=soss_research
  132. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2019/POWW-2019-Fact-sheet-Central-and-Southern-Asia-en.pdf
  133. https://socy.umd.edu/sites/socy.umd.edu/files/users/sdesai/Yeung.pdf
  134. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/697584?mobileUi=0
  135. https://thediplomat.com/2023/11/gender-norms-and-womens-double-burden-in-east-asia/
  136. https://read.dukeupress.edu/demography/article/59/2/761/294840/The-Rise-of-Sonless-Families-in-Asia-and-North
  137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140197100903488
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6070151/
  139. https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/29/china/china-millennials-marriage-intl-hnk
  140. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307881847_Families_in_Asia_A_Cross-national_comparison_of_household_size_and_co-residence
  141. https://www.rsfjournal.org/content/7/2/130
  142. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.html
  143. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/05/01/key-facts-about-asians-in-the-us/
  144. https://usafacts.org/articles/the-diverse-demographics-of-asian-americans/
  145. https://aapidata.com/data/by-the-numbers-education/
  146. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2024/09/household-income-race-hispanic.html
  147. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203297/median-income-of-asian-households-in-the-us/
  148. https://advocacy.sba.gov/2023/05/23/facts-about-small-business-asian-american-and-pacific-islander-ownership-statistics/
  149. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gdp-per-capita-by-country
  150. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
  151. https://www.history.com/articles/han-dynasty-inventions
  152. https://www.chinahighlights.com/travelguide/culture/four-great-invention.htm
  153. https://theconversation.com/five-ways-ancient-india-changed-the-world-with-maths-84332
  154. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/dating-ancient-indian-text-gives-new-timeline-history-zero-180964896/
  155. https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2014/press.html
  156. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2016/10/5-japanese-innovations-that-changed-the-world/
  157. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20257
  158. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/insights/statistical-releases/2025/03/rd-spending-growth-slows-in-oecd-surges-in-china-government-support-for-energy-and-defence-rd-rises-sharply.html
  159. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1986/lee/biographical/
  160. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/globalcaste/caste0801-03.htm
  161. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2016/03/caste-systems-violate-human-rights-and-dignity-millions-worldwide-new-un
  162. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1486&context=hrbrief
  163. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394774648_A_Comprehensive_Analysis_of_Honor_Killing_Practices_in_Pakistan_Contributing_Factors_Legal_Frameworks_and_Intervention_Strategies
  164. https://2024.sci-hub.se/8124/967f89244b403fd3dd58c09fd2a7eaf9/10.1177%402455632719880852.pdf
  165. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0539018421994777
  166. https://www.thehindu.com/data/dowry-deaths-in-india-long-investigations-rare-convictions/article69814491.ece
  167. https://www.indiaspend.com/data-gaps/why-dowry-related-crimes-are-underreported-967773
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4224306/
  169. https://www.unicef.org/rosa/press-releases/south-asia-could-eliminate-child-marriage-only-55years-unicef
  170. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9691026/
  171. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Child_marriage_paper-in-South-Asia.2013.pdf
  172. https://www.fgmcri.org/continent/asia/
  173. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation
  174. https://healthpolicy-watch.news/more-health-workers-are-performing-female-genital-mutilation-in-south-east-asia/
  175. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-6405.12956
  176. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/SDD_pub_2530.pdf
  177. https://eastasiaforum.org/2010/10/09/universal-human-rights-cultural-relativism-and-the-asian-values-debate/
  178. https://gsdrc.org/document-library/harmful-traditional-practices-in-three-countries-of-south-asia-culture-human-rights-and-violence-against-women/
  179. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/09/2020-census-dhc-a-asian-population.html
  180. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/daily/by-the-numbers/asian-history-month
  181. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/australias-population-country-birth/2021
  182. https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/6101_AUS
  183. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/uk-population-by-ethnicity/national-and-regional-populations/population-of-england-and-wales/latest/
  184. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/bulletins/ethnicgroupenglandandwales/census2021
  185. https://www.ined.fr/en/publications/editions/population-and-societies/Integration-and-insularity-The-diversity-of-Chinese-immigrants-in-France/
  186. https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/census2021dictionary/variablesbytopic/ethnicgroupnationalidentitylanguageandreligionvariablescensus2021/ethnicgroupdetailed
  187. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/style-guide/ethnic-groups
  188. https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html
  189. https://time.com/5800209/asian-american-census/
  190. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-standard-classification-cultural-and-ethnic-groups-ascceg/latest-release
  191. https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/reports-and-pubs/PDFs/multicultural-framework-review-public-anonymous-submissions/a-c/asian-australian-alliance.PDF
  192. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/ref/dict/az/definition-eng.cfm?ID=pop111
  193. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/dp-pd/sip/details/page.cfm?PoiId=2&Lang=E&Dguid=2021A000011124&TId=12
  194. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/o1/en/plus/6178-statistical-snapshot-asians-canada
  195. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/mandate/corporate-initiatives/levels.html
  196. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/australias-population-country-birth/latest-release
  197. https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/research-and-statistics/statistics/country-profiles/profiles/peoples-republic-of-china
  198. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/canada-immigration-policy-inflection-point
  199. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/30/americas/migrant-workers-canada-abuse-amnesty-intl-latam
  200. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/kff-la-times-survey-of-immigrants/
  201. https://www.usccr.gov/files/2023-10/fy-2023-se-report.pdf
  202. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12243019/
  203. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/asian-american-identity-shared-racial-status-and-political-context/BDC6709C346FF07C8C3C085F83E0AAF6
  204. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3873865/
  205. https://www.npr.org/transcripts/1126642816
  206. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9235292/
  207. https://www.statnews.com/2023/11/21/asian-american-health-disparities-obscured/
  208. https://dlab.berkeley.edu/news/why-data-disaggregation-matters-exploring-diversity-asian-american-economic-outcomes-using
  209. https://jenniferdwu.com/research/Wu_2.pdf
  210. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383500156_Asian_is_a_Problematic_Category_in_Research_and_Practice_Insights_From_the_Bamboo_Ceiling
  211. https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2023/11/30/discrimination-experiences-shape-most-asian-americans-lives/
  212. https://ncrc.org/racial-wealth-snapshot-asian-americans-and-the-racial-wealth-divide-2023/
  213. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4324759/
  214. https://www.jceps.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/13-1-5.pdf
  215. https://dlab.berkeley.edu/news/disaggregating-race-and-ethnicity-categories-census-data
  216. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/59763/chapter/508342714?searchresult=1
  217. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/chinese-immigration
  218. https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/japanese-relocation
  219. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/japanese-american-incarceration
  220. https://www.justice.gov/crt/combating-post-911-discriminatory-backlash-6
  221. https://www.advancingjustice-aajc.org/press-release/asian-american-hate-incidents-remain-alarmingly-high-according-newly-released-fbi
  222. https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2023/11/30/asian-americans-and-discrimination-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
  223. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/09/26/chinese-americans-discrimination-asian-hate-survey/
  224. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X25000754
  225. https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/10/how-india-china-border-deal-impacts-their-ties-and-us
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.