Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Chordate
View on Wikipedia
| Chordates | |
|---|---|
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Subkingdom: | Eumetazoa |
| Clade: | ParaHoxozoa |
| Clade: | Bilateria |
| Clade: | Nephrozoa |
| Superphylum: | Deuterostomia |
| Phylum: | Chordata Haeckel, 1874[3][4] |
| Subgroups | |
And see text | |
A chordate (/ˈkɔːrdeɪt/ KOR-dayt) is a bilaterian animal belonging to the phylum Chordata (/kɔːrˈdeɪtə/ kor-DAY-tə). All chordates possess, at some point during their larval or adult stages, five distinctive physical characteristics (synapomorphies) that distinguish them from other taxa. These five synapomorphies are a notochord, a hollow dorsal nerve cord, an endostyle or thyroid, pharyngeal slits, and a post-anal tail.[8]
In addition to the morphological characteristics used to define chordates, analysis of genome sequences has identified two conserved signature indels (CSIs) in their proteins: cyclophilin-like protein and inner mitochondrial membrane protease ATP23, which are exclusively shared by all vertebrates, tunicates and cephalochordates.[9] These CSIs provide molecular means to reliably distinguish chordates from all other animals.
Chordates are divided into three subphyla: Vertebrata (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals), whose notochords are replaced by a cartilaginous/bony axial endoskeleton (spine) and are cladistically and phylogenetically a subgroup of the clade Craniata (i.e. chordates with a skull); Tunicata or Urochordata (sea squirts, salps, and larvaceans), which only retain the synapomorphies during their larval stage; and Cephalochordata (lancelets), which resemble jawless fish but have no gills or a distinct head. The vertebrates and tunicates compose the clade Olfactores, which is sister to Cephalochordata (see diagram under Phylogeny). Extinct taxa such as the conodonts are chordates, but their internal placement is less certain. Hemichordata (which includes the acorn worms) was previously considered a fourth chordate subphylum, but now is treated as a separate phylum which are now thought to be closer to the echinoderms, and together they form the clade Ambulacraria, the sister phylum of the chordates. Chordata, Ambulacraria, and possibly Xenacoelomorpha are believed to form the superphylum Deuterostomia, although this called into doubt in a 2021 publication.[10]
Chordata is the third-largest phylum of the animal kingdom (behind only the protostomal phyla Arthropoda and Mollusca) and is also one of the most ancient animal taxa. Chordate fossils have been found from as early as the Cambrian explosion over 539 million years ago.[11] Of the more than 81,000 living species of chordates, about half are ray-finned fishes (class Actinopterygii) and the vast majority of the rest are tetrapods, a terrestrial clade of lobe-finned fishes (Sarcopterygii) who evolved air-breathing using lungs.[12]
Etymology
[edit]The name "chordate" comes from the first of these synapomorphies, the notochord, which plays a significant role in chordate body plan structuring and movements. Chordates are also bilaterally symmetric, have a coelom, possess a closed circulatory system, and exhibit metameric segmentation. Although the name Chordata is attributed to William Bateson (1885), it was already in prevalent use by 1880. Ernst Haeckel described a taxon comprising tunicates, cephalochordates, and vertebrates in 1866. Though he used the German vernacular form, it is allowed under the ICZN code because of its subsequent latinization.[4]
Anatomy
[edit]
Chordates form a phylum of animals that are defined by having at some stage in their lives all of the following anatomical features:[13]
- A notochord, a stiff but elastic rod of glycoprotein wrapped in two collagen helices, which extends along the central axis of the body. Among members of the subphylum Vertebrata (vertebrates), the notochord gets replaced by hyaline cartilage or osseous tissue of the spine, and notochord remnants develop into the intervertebral discs, which allow adjacent spinal vertebrae to bend and twist relative to each other. In wholly aquatic species, this helps the animal swim efficiently by flexing its tail side-to-side.
- A hollow dorsal nerve cord, also known as the neural tube, which develops into the spinal cord, the main communications trunk of the nervous system. In vertebrates, the rostral end of the neural tube enlarges into several vesicles during embryonic development, which give rise to the brain.
- Pharyngeal slits. The pharynx is the part of the throat immediately behind the mouth. In fish, the slits are modified to form gills, but in some other chordates they are part of a filter-feeding system that extracts food particles from ingested water. In tetrapods, they are only present during embryonic stages of the development.
- A post-anal tail. A muscular tail that extends backwards beyond the location of the anus. In some chordates such as hominids, this is only present in the embryonic stage.
- An endostyle. This is a groove in the ventral wall of the pharynx. In filter-feeding species it produces mucus to gather food particles, which helps in transporting food to the esophagus.[14] It also stores iodine, and may be a precursor of the vertebrate thyroid gland.[13]
There are soft constraints that separate chordates from other biological lineages, but are not part of the formal definition:
- All chordates are deuterostomes, which means that, during embryonic development, the anus forms before the mouth does.
- All chordates are based on a bilateral body plan.[15]
- All chordates are coelomates, and have a fluid-filled body cavity (coelom) with a complete serosal lining derived from mesoderm called mesothelium (see Brusca and Brusca).[16]
Classification
[edit]The following schema is from the 2015 edition of Vertebrate Palaeontology.[17][18] The invertebrate chordate classes are from Fishes of the World.[19] While it is generally structured so as to reflect evolutionary relationships (similar to a cladogram), it also retains the traditional ranks used in Linnaean taxonomy.
- Phylum Chordata
- Subphylum Cephalochordata (Acraniata) – (lancelets; 30 species)
- Class Leptocardii (lancelets)
- Subphylum Tunicata (Urochordata) – (tunicates; 3,000 species)
- Class "Ascidiacea" (sea squirts; paraphyletic as thaliaceans are excluded)
- Class Thaliacea (salps, doliolids and pyrosomes)
- Class Appendicularia (larvaceans)
- Subphylum Vertebrata (Craniata) (vertebrates – animals with backbones; 66,100+ species)
- Infraphylum "Agnatha" paraphyletic (jawless vertebrates; 100+ species)
- Superclass Cyclostomata
- Class Myxinoidea or Myxini (hagfish; 65 species)
- Class Petromyzontida or Hyperoartia (lampreys)
- Class †Conodonta
- Class †Myllokunmingiida
- Class †Pteraspidomorphi
- Class †Thelodonti
- Class †Anaspida
- Class †Cephalaspidomorphi
- Superclass Cyclostomata
- Infraphylum Gnathostomata (jawed vertebrates)
- Class †"Placodermi" (Paleozoic armoured forms; paraphyletic in relation to all other gnathostomes)
- Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fish; 900+ species)
- Class †"Acanthodii" (Paleozoic "spiny sharks"; paraphyletic in relation to Chondrichthyes)
- Class "Osteichthyes" (bony fish; 30,000+ species; paraphyletic when tetrapods are excluded)
- Subclass Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish; about 30,000 species)
- Subclass "Sarcopterygii" (lobe-finned fish: 8 species; paraphyletic when tetrapods are excluded)
- Superclass Tetrapoda (four-limbed vertebrates; 35,100+ species)[a][20]
- Infraphylum "Agnatha" paraphyletic (jawless vertebrates; 100+ species)
- Subphylum Cephalochordata (Acraniata) – (lancelets; 30 species)
Subphyla
[edit]
Cephalochordata: Lancelets
[edit]Cephalochordates, one of the three subdivisions of chordates, are small, "vaguely fish-shaped" animals that lack brains, clearly defined heads and specialized sense organs.[25] These burrowing filter-feeders compose the earliest-branching chordate subphylum.[26][27]
Tunicata (Urochordata)
[edit]
The tunicates have three distinct adult shapes. Each is a member of one of three monophyletic clades. All tunicate larvae have the standard chordate features, including long, tadpole-like tails. Their larva also have rudimentary brains, light sensors and tilt sensors.[28]
The smallest of the three groups of tunicates is the Appendicularia. They retain tadpole-like shapes and active swimming all their lives, and were for a long time regarded as larvae of the other two groups.[29]
The other two groups, the sea squirts and the salps, metamorphize into adult forms which lose the notochord, nerve cord, and post anal tail. Both are soft-bodied filter feeders with multiple gill slits. They feed on plankton which they collect in their mucus.
Sea squirts are sessile and consist mainly of water pumps and filter-feeding apparatus.[28] Most attach firmly to the sea floor, where they remain in one place for life, feeding on plankton.
The salps float in mid-water, feeding on plankton, and have a two-generation cycle in which one generation is solitary and the next forms chain-like colonies.[30]
The etymology of the term Urochordata (Balfour 1881) is from the ancient Greek οὐρά (oura, "tail") + Latin chorda ("cord"), because the notochord is only found in the tail.[31] The term Tunicata (Lamarck 1816) is recognised as having precedence and is now more commonly used.[28]
--------------------------------------------------------
1. Notochord, 2. Nerve chord, 3. Buccal cirri, 4. Pharynx, 5. Gill slit, 6. Gonad, 7. Gut, 8. V-shaped muscles, 9. Anus, 10. Inhalant syphon, 11. Exhalant syphon, 12. Heart, 13. Stomach, 14. Esophagus, 15. Intestines, 16. Tail, 17. Atrium, 18. Tunic
Craniata (Vertebrata)
[edit]
Craniates all have distinct skulls. They include the hagfish, which have no vertebrae. Michael J. Benton commented that "craniates are characterized by their heads, just as chordates, or possibly all deuterostomes, are by their tails".[32]
Most craniates are vertebrates, in which the notochord is replaced by the vertebral column.[33] It consists of a series of bony or cartilaginous cylindrical vertebrae, generally with neural arches that protect the spinal cord, and with projections that link the vertebrae. Hagfishes have incomplete braincases and no vertebrae, and are therefore not regarded as vertebrates,[34] but they are members of the craniates, the group within which vertebrates are thought to have evolved.[35] However the cladistic exclusion of hagfish from the vertebrates is controversial, as they may instead be degenerate vertebrates who have secondarily lost their vertebral columns.[36]
Before molecular phylogenetics, the position of lampreys was ambiguous. They have complete braincases and rudimentary vertebrae, and therefore may be regarded as vertebrates and true fish.[37] However, molecular phylogenetics, which uses DNA to classify organisms, has produced both results that group them with vertebrates and others that group them with hagfish.[38] If lampreys are more closely related to the hagfish than the other vertebrates, this would suggest that they form a clade, which has been named the Cyclostomata.[39]
Phylogeny
[edit]Overview
[edit]
There is still much ongoing differential (DNA sequence based) comparison research that is trying to separate out the simplest forms of chordates. As some lineages of the 90% of species that lack a backbone or notochord might have lost these structures over time, this complicates the classification of chordates. Some chordate lineages may only be found by DNA analysis, when there is no physical trace of any chordate-like structures.[41]
Attempts to work out the evolutionary relationships of the chordates have produced several hypotheses. The current consensus is that chordates are monophyletic (meaning that the Chordata includes all and only the descendants of a single common ancestor, which is itself a chordate) and that the vertebrates' nearest relatives are tunicates. In 2016, identification of two conserved signature indels (CSIs) in the proteins cyclophilin-like protein and mitochondrial inner membrane protease ATP23, which are exclusively shared by all vertebrates, tunicates and cephalochordates also provided strong evidence of the monophyly of Chordata.[9]
All of the earliest chordate fossils have been found in the Early Cambrian Chengjiang fauna, and include three species that are regarded as fish,[citation needed] and hence vertebrates. Because the fossil record of early chordates is poor, only molecular phylogenetics offers a reasonable prospect of dating their emergence. However, the use of molecular phylogenetics for dating evolutionary transitions is controversial. It has proven difficult to produce a detailed classification within the living chordates. Attempts to produce evolutionary "family trees" shows that many of the traditional classes are paraphyletic.[citation needed]
While this has been well known since the 19th century, an insistence on only monophyletic taxa has resulted in vertebrate classification being in a state of flux.[42]
The majority of animals more complex than jellyfish and other cnidarians are split into two groups, the protostomes and deuterostomes, the latter of which contains chordates.[43] It seems very likely the 555 million-year-old Kimberella was a member of the protostomes.[44][45] If so, this means the protostome and deuterostome lineages must have split some time before Kimberella appeared—at least 558 million years ago, and hence well before the start of the Cambrian 538.8 million years ago.[43] Three enigmatic species that are possible very early tunicates, and therefore deuterostomes, were also found from the Ediacaran period – Ausia fenestrata from the Nama Group of Namibia, the sac-like Yarnemia ascidiformis, and one from a second new Ausia-like genus from the Onega Peninsula of northern Russia, Burykhia hunti. Results of a new study have shown possible affinity of these Ediacaran organisms to the ascidians.[46][47] Ausia and Burykhia lived in shallow coastal waters slightly more than 555 to 548 million years ago, and are believed to be the oldest evidence of the chordate lineage of metazoans.[47] The Russian Precambrian fossil Yarnemia is identified as a tunicate only tentatively, because its fossils are nowhere near as well-preserved as those of Ausia and Burykhia, so this identification has been questioned.[citation needed]


Fossils of one major deuterostome group, the echinoderms (whose modern members include starfish, sea urchins and crinoids), are quite common from the start of the Cambrian, 542 million years ago.[48] The Mid Cambrian fossil Rhabdotubus johanssoni has been interpreted as a pterobranch hemichordate.[49] Opinions differ about whether the Chengjiang fauna fossil Yunnanozoon, from the earlier Cambrian, was a hemichordate or chordate.[50][51] Another fossil, Haikouella lanceolata, also from the Chengjiang fauna, is interpreted as a chordate and possibly a craniate, as it shows signs of a heart, arteries, gill filaments, a tail, a neural chord with a brain at the front end, and possibly eyes—although it also had short tentacles round its mouth.[51] Haikouichthys and Myllokunmingia, also from the Chengjiang fauna, are regarded as fish.[40][52] Pikaia, discovered much earlier (1911) but from the Mid Cambrian Burgess Shale (505 Ma), is also regarded as a primitive chordate.[53] On the other hand, fossils of early chordates are very rare, since invertebrate chordates have no bones or teeth, and only one has been reported for the rest of the Cambrian.[54] The best known and earliest unequivocally identified Tunicate is Shankouclava shankouense from the Lower Cambrian Maotianshan Shale at Shankou village, Anning, near Kunming (South China).[55]
The evolutionary relationships between the chordate groups and between chordates as a whole and their closest deuterostome relatives have been debated since 1890. Studies based on anatomical, embryological, and paleontological data have produced different "family trees". Some closely linked chordates and hemichordates, but that idea is now rejected.[14] Combining such analyses with data from a small set of ribosome RNA genes eliminated some older ideas, but opened up the possibility that tunicates (urochordates) are "basal deuterostomes", surviving members of the group from which echinoderms, hemichordates and chordates evolved.[56] Some researchers believe that, within the chordates, craniates are most closely related to cephalochordates, but there are also reasons for regarding tunicates (urochordates) as craniates' closest relatives.[14][57]
Since early chordates have left a poor fossil record, attempts have been made to calculate the key dates in their evolution by molecular phylogenetics techniques—by analyzing biochemical differences, mainly in RNA. One such study suggested that deuterostomes arose before 900 million years ago and the earliest chordates around 896 million years ago.[57] However, molecular estimates of dates often disagree with each other and with the fossil record,[57] and their assumption that the molecular clock runs at a known constant rate has been challenged.[58][59]
Traditionally, Cephalochordata and Craniata were grouped into the proposed clade "Euchordata", which would have been the sister group to Tunicata/Urochordata. More recently, Cephalochordata has been thought of as a sister group to the "Olfactores", which includes the craniates and tunicates. The matter is not yet settled.[citation needed]
A specific relationship between vertebrates and tunicates is also strongly supported by two CSIs found in the proteins predicted exosome complex RRP44 and serine palmitoyltransferase, that are exclusively shared by species from these two subphyla but not cephalochordates, indicating vertebrates are more closely related to tunicates than cephalochordates.[9]
Cladogram
[edit]Below is a phylogenetic tree of the phylum. Lines of the cladogram show probable evolutionary relationships between both extinct taxa, which are denoted with a dagger (†), and extant taxa.[60][61][62][63][64]
| Chordata |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closest non-chordate relatives
[edit]
The closest relatives of the chordates are believed to be the hemichordates and Echinodermata, which together form the Ambulacraria. The Chordata and Ambulacraria together form the superphylum Deuterostomia.
Hemichordates
[edit]Hemichordates ("half chordates") have some features similar to those of chordates: branchial openings that open into the pharynx and look rather like gill slits; stomochords, similar in composition to notochords, but running in a circle round the "collar", which is ahead of the mouth; and a dorsal nerve cord—but also a smaller ventral nerve cord.
There are two living groups of hemichordates. The solitary enteropneusts, commonly known as "acorn worms", have long proboscises and worm-like bodies with up to 200 branchial slits, are up to 2.5 metres (8.2 ft) long, and burrow though seafloor sediments. Pterobranchs are colonial animals, often less than 1 millimetre (0.039 in) long individually, whose dwellings are interconnected. Each filter feeds by means of a pair of branched tentacles, and has a short, shield-shaped proboscis. The extinct graptolites, colonial animals whose fossils look like tiny hacksaw blades, lived in tubes similar to those of pterobranchs.[65]
Echinoderms
[edit]
Echinoderms differ from chordates and their other relatives in three conspicuous ways: they possess bilateral symmetry only as larvae – in adulthood they have radial symmetry, meaning that their body pattern is shaped like a wheel; they have tube feet; and their bodies are supported by dermal skeletons made of calcite, a material not used by chordates. Their hard, calcified shells keep their bodies well protected from the environment, and these skeletons enclose their bodies, but are also covered by thin skins. The feet are powered by another unique feature of echinoderms, a water vascular system of canals that also functions as a "lung" and surrounded by muscles that act as pumps. Crinoids are typically sessile and look rather like flowers (hence the common name "sea lilies"), and use their feather-like arms to filter food particles out of the water; most live anchored to rocks, but a few species can move very slowly. Other echinoderms are mobile and take a variety of body shapes, for example starfish and brittle stars, sea urchins and sea cucumbers.[66]
See also
[edit]- Chordate genomics – Study of the evolution of the chordate clade
- List of chordate orders
Notes
[edit]- ^ The classification below follows Benton 2004, and uses a synthesis of rank-based Linnaean taxonomy and also reflects evolutionary relationships. Benton included the superclass Tetrapoda in the subclass Sarcopterygii in order to reflect the direct descent of tetrapods from lobe-finned fish, despite the former being assigned a higher taxonomic rank
References
[edit]- ^ Yang, Chuan; Li, Xian-Hua; Zhu, Maoyan; Condon, Daniel J.; Chen, Junyuan (2018). "Geochronological constraint on the Cambrian Chengjiang biota, South China" (PDF). Journal of the Geological Society. 175 (4): 659–666. Bibcode:2018JGSoc.175..659Y. doi:10.1144/jgs2017-103. ISSN 0016-7649. S2CID 135091168. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ Fedonkin, M. A.; Vickers-Rich, P.; Swalla, B. J.; Trusler, P.; Hall, M. (2012). "A new metazoan from the Vendian of the White Sea, Russia, with possible affinities to the ascidians". Paleontological Journal. 46 (1): 1–11. Bibcode:2012PalJ...46....1F. doi:10.1134/S0031030112010042. S2CID 128415270.
- ^ Haeckel, E. (1874). Anthropogenie oder Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen. Leipzig: Engelmann.
- ^ a b Nielsen, C. (July 2012). "The authorship of higher chordate taxa". Zoologica Scripta. 41 (4): 435–436. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00536.x. S2CID 83266247.
- ^ a b He, K.; Liu, J.; Han, J.; Ou, Q.; Chen, A.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, D.; Hua, H.; Zhang, X.; Shu, D. (2023). "Comment on "Ultrastructure reveals ancestral vertebrate pharyngeal skeleton in yunnanozoans"". Science. 381 (6656) eade9707. doi:10.1126/science.ade9707. PMID 37499008.
- ^ Mussini, G.; Smith, M. P.; Vinther, J.; Rahman, I. A.; Murdock, D. J. E.; Harper, D. A. T.; Dunn, F. S. (2024). "A new interpretation of Pikaia reveals the origins of the chordate body plan". Current Biology. 34 (13): 2980–2989.e2. Bibcode:2024CBio...34.2980M. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.05.026. hdl:10141/623098. PMID 38866005.
- ^ a b Lerosey-Aubril, R.; Ortega-Hernández, J. (2024). "A long-headed Cambrian soft-bodied vertebrate from the American Great Basin region". Royal Society Open Science. 11 (7) 240350. Bibcode:2024RSOS...1140350L. doi:10.1098/rsos.240350. PMC 11267725. PMID 39050723.
- ^ Freeborn, Michelle (1 January 2015). Roberts, Clive Douglas; Stewart, Andrew L.; Struthers, Carl D. (eds.). The fishes of New Zealand. Vol. Two. Te Papa Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-9941041-6-8. Archived from the original on 29 August 2024. Retrieved 29 May 2024.
- ^ a b c Gupta, Radhey S. (January 2016). "Molecular signatures that are distinctive characteristics of the vertebrates and chordates and supporting a grouping of vertebrates with the tunicates". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 94 (Pt A): 383–391. Bibcode:2016MolPE..94..383G. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.09.019. ISSN 1055-7903. PMID 26419477.
- ^ Kapli, Paschalia; Natsidis, Paschalis; Leite, Daniel J.; Fursman, Maximilian; Jeffrie, Nadia; Rahman, Imran A.; Philippe, Hervé; Copley, Richard R.; Telford, Maximilian J. (19 March 2021). "Lack of support for Deuterostomia prompts reinterpretation of the first Bilateria". Science Advances. 7 (12) eabe2741. Bibcode:2021SciA....7.2741K. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe2741. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 7978419. PMID 33741592.
- ^ "Stratigraphic Chart 2022" (PDF). International Stratigraphic Commission. February 2022. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
- ^ "Chordates". eol. Archived from the original on 25 September 2023. Retrieved 2 February 2023.
- ^ a b Rychel, A.L.; Smith, S.E.; Shimamoto, H.T. & Swalla, B.J. (March 2006). "Evolution and Development of the Chordates: Collagen and Pharyngeal Cartilage". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 23 (3): 541–549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msj055. PMID 16280542.
- ^ a b c d Ruppert, E. (January 2005). "Key characters uniting hemichordates and chordates: homologies or homoplasies?". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 83 (1): 8–23. Bibcode:2005CaJZ...83....8R. doi:10.1139/Z04-158. Archived from the original on 9 December 2012. Retrieved 22 September 2008.
- ^ Valentine, J.W. (2004). On the Origin of Phyla. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-226-84548-7.
- ^ R.C.Brusca, G.J.Brusca. Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland Mass 2003 (2nd ed.), p. 47, ISBN 0-87893-097-3.
- ^ Benton, M.J. (2004). Vertebrate Palaeontology, Third Edition. Blackwell Publishing. The classification scheme is available online Archived 19 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Benton, Michael J. (2014). Vertebrate Palaeontology (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-40764-6.
- ^ Nelson, J. S. (2006). Fishes of the World (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-25031-9.
- ^ Benton, M.J. (2004). Vertebrate Paleontology. 3rd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd.
- ^ Frost, Darrel R. "ASW Home". Amphibian Species of the World, an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
- ^ "Reptiles face risk of extinction". BBC Nature. 15 February 2013. Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 20 December 2019 – via BBC.
- ^ "New Study Doubles the Estimate of Bird Species in the World". Amnh.org. Archived from the original on 25 September 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2018.
- ^ "Species Statistics Aug 2019". www.reptile-database.org. Archived from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 30 October 2020.
- ^ Benton, M.J. (14 April 2000). Vertebrate Palaeontology: Biology and Evolution. Blackwell Publishing. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-632-05614-9. Retrieved 22 September 2008.
- ^ Gee, H. (19 June 2008). "Evolutionary biology: The amphioxus unleashed". Nature. 453 (7198): 999–1000. Bibcode:2008Natur.453..999G. doi:10.1038/453999a. PMID 18563145. S2CID 4402585.
- ^ "Branchiostoma". Lander University. Archived from the original on 24 March 2016. Retrieved 5 February 2016.
- ^ a b c Benton, M.J. (14 April 2000). Vertebrate Palaeontology: Biology and Evolution. Blackwell Publishing. p. 5. ISBN 978-0-632-05614-9.
- ^ "Appendicularia" (PDF). Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2011. Retrieved 28 October 2008.
- ^ "Animal fact files: salp". BBC. Archived from the original on 21 June 2013. Retrieved 22 September 2008.
- ^ Oxford English Dictionary, Third Edition, January 2009: Urochordata
- ^ Benton, M.J. (14 April 2000). Vertebrate Palaeontology: Biology and Evolution. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 12–13. ISBN 978-0-632-05614-9. Retrieved 22 September 2008.
- ^ "Morphology of the Vertebrates". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Archived from the original on 6 August 2012. Retrieved 23 September 2008.
- ^ "Introduction to the Myxini". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Archived from the original on 15 December 2017. Retrieved 28 October 2008.
- ^ Campbell, N.A.; Reece, J.B. (2005). Biology (7th ed.). San Francisco, California: Benjamin Cummings. ISBN 978-0-8053-7171-0.
- ^ Janvier, P. (2010). "MicroRNAs revive old views about jawless vertebrate divergence and evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (45): 19137–19138. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10719137J. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014583107. PMC 2984170. PMID 21041649.
Although I was among the early supporters of vertebrate paraphyly, I am impressed by the evidence provided by Heimberg et al. and prepared to admit that cyclostomes are, in fact, monophyletic. The consequence is that they may tell us little, if anything, about the dawn of vertebrate evolution, except that the intuitions of 19th century zoologists were correct in assuming that these odd vertebrates (notably, hagfishes) are strongly degenerate and have lost many characters over time
- ^ "Introduction to the Petromyzontiformes". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Archived from the original on 24 January 2018. Retrieved 28 October 2008.
- ^ Shigehiro Kuraku, S.; Hoshiyama, D.; Katoh, K.; Suga, H.; Miyata, T. (December 1999). "Monophyly of Lampreys and Hagfishes Supported by Nuclear DNA-Coded Genes". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 49 (6): 729–735. Bibcode:1999JMolE..49..729K. doi:10.1007/PL00006595. PMID 10594174. S2CID 5613153.
- ^ Delabre, Christiane; et al. (2002). "Complete Mitochondrial DNA of the Hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri: The Comparative Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA Sequences Strngly Supports the Cyclostome Monophyly". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 22 (2): 184–192. Bibcode:2002MolPE..22..184D. doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.1045. PMID 11820840.
- ^ a b Shu, D-G.; Conway Morris, S. & Han, J. (January 2003). "Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys". Nature. 421 (6922): 526–529. Bibcode:2003Natur.421..526S. doi:10.1038/nature01264. PMID 12556891. S2CID 4401274.
- ^ Josh Gabbatiss (15 August 2016), Why we have a spine when over 90% of animals don't, BBC, archived from the original on 23 September 2016, retrieved 10 September 2016
- ^ Holland, N. D. (22 November 2005). "Chordates". Curr. Biol. 15 (22): R911–4. Bibcode:2005CBio...15.R911H. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.008. PMID 16303545.
- ^ a b Erwin, Douglas H.; Eric H. Davidson (1 July 2002). "The last common bilaterian ancestor". Development. 129 (13): 3021–3032. doi:10.1242/dev.129.13.3021. PMID 12070079. Archived from the original on 2 December 2009. Retrieved 22 September 2008.
- ^ Fedonkin, M.A.; Simonetta, A; Ivantsov, A.Y. (2007), "New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusc-like organism (White sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications", in Vickers-Rich, Patricia; Komarower, Patricia (eds.), The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota, Special publications, vol. 286, London: Geological Society, pp. 157–179, doi:10.1144/SP286.12, ISBN 978-1-86239-233-5, OCLC 156823511
- ^ Butterfield, N.J. (December 2006). "Hooking some stem-group "worms": fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale". BioEssays. 28 (12): 1161–6. doi:10.1002/bies.20507. PMID 17120226. S2CID 29130876.
- ^ Vickers-Rich P. (2007). "Chapter 4. The Nama Fauna of Southern Africa". In: Fedonkin, M. A.; Gehling, J. G.; Grey, K.; Narbonne, G. M.; Vickers-Rich, P. "The Rise of Animals: Evolution and Diversification of the Kingdom Animalia", Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 69–87
- ^ a b Fedonkin, M. A.; Vickers-Rich, P.; Swalla, B.; Trusler, P.; Hall, M. (2008). "A Neoproterozoic chordate with possible affinity to the ascidians: New fossil evidence from the Vendian of the White Sea, Russia and its evolutionary and ecological implications". HPF-07 Rise and fall of the Ediacaran (Vendian) biota. International Geological Congress - Oslo 2008.
- ^ Bengtson, S. (2004). Lipps, J.H.; Waggoner, B.M. (eds.). "Early skeletal fossils" (PDF). The Paleontological Society Papers: Neoproterozoic – Cambrian Biological Revolutions. 10: 67–78. doi:10.1017/S1089332600002345. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 18 July 2008.
- ^ Bengtson, S.; Urbanek, A. (October 2007). "Rhabdotubus, a Middle Cambrian rhabdopleurid hemichordate". Lethaia. 19 (4): 293–308. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1986.tb00743.x. Archived from the original on 16 December 2012.
- ^ Shu, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, L. (April 1996). "Reinterpretation of Yunnanozoon as the earliest known hemichordate". Nature. 380 (6573): 428–430. Bibcode:1996Natur.380..428S. doi:10.1038/380428a0. S2CID 4368647.
- ^ a b Chen, J-Y.; Hang, D-Y.; Li, C.W. (December 1999). "An early Cambrian craniate-like chordate". Nature. 402 (6761): 518–522. Bibcode:1999Natur.402..518C. doi:10.1038/990080. S2CID 24895681.
- ^ Shu, D-G.; Conway Morris, S.; Zhang, X-L. (November 1999). "Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China" (PDF). Nature. 402 (6757): 42. Bibcode:1999Natur.402...42S. doi:10.1038/46965. S2CID 4402854. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 February 2009. Retrieved 23 September 2008.
- ^ Shu, D-G.; Conway Morris, S.; Zhang, X-L. (November 1996). "A Pikaia-like chordate from the Lower Cambrian of China". Nature. 384 (6605): 157–158. Bibcode:1996Natur.384..157S. doi:10.1038/384157a0. S2CID 4234408.
- ^ Conway Morris, S. (2008). "A Redescription of a Rare Chordate, Metaspriggina walcotti Simonetta and Insom, from the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian), British Columbia, Canada". Journal of Paleontology. 82 (2): 424–430. Bibcode:2008JPal...82..424M. doi:10.1666/06-130.1. S2CID 85619898. Archived from the original on 29 September 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2009.
- ^ Chen, Jun-Yuan; Huang, Di-Ying; Peng, Qing-Qing; Chi, Hui-Mei; Wang,Xiu-Qiang; Feng, Man (2003). "The first tunicate from the Early Cambrian of South China". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100 (14): 8314–8318. Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.8314C. doi:10.1073/pnas.1431177100. PMC 166226. PMID 12835415.
- ^ Winchell, C. J.; Sullivan, J.; Cameron, C. B.; Swalla, B. J. & Mallatt, J. (1 May 2002). "Evaluating Hypotheses of Deuterostome Phylogeny and Chordate Evolution with New LSU and SSU Ribosomal DNA Data". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 19 (5): 762–776. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004134. PMID 11961109.
- ^ a b c Blair, J. E.; Hedges, S. B. (November 2005). "Molecular Phylogeny and Divergence Times of Deuterostome Animals". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 22 (11): 2275–2284. doi:10.1093/molbev/msi225. PMID 16049193.
- ^ Ayala, F. J. (January 1999). "Molecular clock mirages". BioEssays. 21 (1): 71–75. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199901)21:1<71::AID-BIES9>3.0.CO;2-B. PMID 10070256.
- ^ Schwartz, J. H.; Maresca, B. (December 2006). "Do Molecular Clocks Run at All? A Critique of Molecular Systematics". Biological Theory. 1 (4): 357–371. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.534.4060. doi:10.1162/biot.2006.1.4.357. S2CID 28166727.
- ^ Putnam, N. H.; Butts, T.; Ferrier, D. E. K.; Furlong, R. F.; Hellsten, U.; Kawashima, T.; Robinson-Rechavi, M.; Shoguchi, E.; Terry, A.; Yu, J. K.; Benito-Gutiérrez, E. L.; Dubchak, I.; Garcia-Fernàndez, J.; Gibson-Brown, J. J.; Grigoriev, I. V.; Horton, A. C.; De Jong, P. J.; Jurka, J.; Kapitonov, V. V.; Kohara, Y.; Kuroki, Y.; Lindquist, E.; Lucas, S.; Osoegawa, K.; Pennacchio, L. A.; Salamov, A. A.; Satou, Y.; Sauka-Spengler, T.; Schmutz, J.; Shin-i, T. (June 2008). "The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype". Nature. 453 (7198): 1064–1071. Bibcode:2008Natur.453.1064P. doi:10.1038/nature06967. PMID 18563158.
- ^ Ota, K. G.; Kuratani, S. (September 2007). "Cyclostome embryology and early evolutionary history of vertebrates". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 47 (3): 329–337. doi:10.1093/icb/icm022. PMID 21672842.
- ^ Delsuc F, Philippe H, Tsagkogeorga G, Simion P, Tilak MK, Turon X, López-Legentil S, Piette J, Lemaire P, Douzery EJ (April 2018). "A phylogenomic framework and timescale for comparative studies of tunicates". BMC Biology. 16 (1) 39. doi:10.1186/s12915-018-0499-2. PMC 5899321. PMID 29653534.
- ^ Goujet, Daniel F (16 February 2015), "Placodermi (Armoured Fishes)", ELS, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 1–7, doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0001533.pub2, ISBN 978-0-470-01590-2
- ^ Miyashita, Tetsuto; Coates, Michael I.; Farrar, Robert; Larson, Peter; Manning, Phillip L.; Wogelius, Roy A.; et al. (2019). "Hagfish from the Cretaceous Tethys Sea and a reconciliation of the morphological–molecular conflict in early vertebrate phylogeny". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116 (6): 2146–2151. Bibcode:2019PNAS..116.2146M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1814794116. PMC 6369785. PMID 30670644.
- ^ "Introduction to the Hemichordata". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Archived from the original on 1 February 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2008.
- ^ Cowen, R. (2000). History of Life (3rd ed.). Blackwell Science. p. 412. ISBN 978-0-632-04444-3.
External links
[edit]- "Chordate". The Encyclopedia of Life.
- Chordate on GlobalTwitcher.com
- Chordate node at Tree Of Life Archived 24 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine
- Chordate node at NCBI Taxonomy Archived 28 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine
Chordate
View on GrokipediaIntroduction and Etymology
Definition and Diagnostic Traits
The phylum Chordata constitutes a major clade within the superphylum Deuterostomia, distinguished by four key synapomorphies that appear at some stage during the life cycle of its members: a notochord, a dorsal hollow nerve cord, pharyngeal slits, and a post-anal tail.[5] These shared derived traits define the phylum, which includes over 65,000 species ranging from invertebrate forms to complex vertebrates, and reflect an evolutionary innovation in body plan organization among deuterostomes.[6] The notochord is a flexible, rod-like structure composed of vacuolated cells embedded in an elastic extracellular matrix, situated along the dorsal midline to provide axial support and enable bending during locomotion.[5] It functions as a hydrostatic skeleton in early developmental stages across all chordates and induces neural tube formation, but in vertebrates, it typically regresses post-embryonically, being replaced by the vertebral column derived from surrounding mesoderm.[5] In contrast, it persists throughout adulthood in basal chordates such as lancelets (Branchiostoma spp.), extending nearly the full body length to maintain structural integrity.[5] The dorsal hollow nerve cord forms as a fluid-filled tube along the dorsal surface, arising from ectodermal invagination during neurulation, and serves as the precursor to the central nervous system, with anterior expansions developing into the brain in more derived forms.[5] This arrangement contrasts with the ventral, solid nerve cords of protostomes and is a hallmark of deuterostome neural organization.[6] Pharyngeal slits consist of perforations in the lateral walls of the pharynx, originally aiding suspension feeding by allowing water to enter and exit while trapping food particles; in embryos, they derive from endodermal outpocketings and are universal among chordates, though their adult persistence and function vary, such as in gill respiration for aquatic species.[5] The post-anal tail projects beyond the anus and incorporates segmental muscle blocks (myomeres) innervated by the nerve cord, facilitating undulatory swimming or burrowing movements.[5] While transient in the larval stages of many chordates—such as the tadpole-like larvae of urochordates—it remains prominent in adults of basal groups like lancelets, where it powers sinusoidal body motions for filter-feeding in sediment.[5] Across the phylum, these traits often manifest most completely during embryonic or larval phases, underscoring the chordate body's conserved developmental blueprint despite diverse adult morphologies.[6]Etymology and Historical Context
The term Chordata derives from the Greek word khordē (χορδή), meaning "cord," "string," or "gut," in reference to the notochord, a flexible, rod-like structure that serves as a defining embryonic feature of the phylum.[7][8] The name was first proposed by Ernst Haeckel in 1866 to denote a group encompassing tunicates and vertebrates (including lancelets) based on shared anatomical traits, though it gained formal taxonomic recognition through William Bateson in 1885.[4][9] Early recognition of chordates centered on vertebrates, with Jean-Baptiste Lamarck introducing the concept of "animaux à vertébrés" (vertebrate animals) in 1801 to describe mammals, birds, reptiles, and fish as a unified group distinguished by their spinal columns.[9] Georges Cuvier advanced this in 1812 by establishing Vertebrata as an embranchement (major division) within the animal kingdom, emphasizing functional anatomy and separating them from invertebrates.[10] Throughout the 19th century, debates raged over the boundaries between vertebrates and invertebrates, particularly concerning tunicates (ascidians) and lancelets; Lamarck initially classified tunicates as a subclass of mollusks in 1816 due to their sessile adult forms and test-like coverings, while Cuvier treated them as a distinct class (Tunicata) but without linking them to vertebrates.[5] A pivotal shift occurred in 1866 when Alexander Kowalevsky demonstrated through embryological studies that ascidian larvae possess a notochord, dorsal hollow nerve cord, and pharyngeal slits—traits homologous to those in vertebrate embryos—prompting their reclassification as proto-chordates rather than mollusks.[11][12] Similar investigations by Francis M. Balfour on lancelets (Branchiostoma) in the 1880s revealed comparable embryonic features, solidifying their inclusion alongside tunicates and vertebrates in the phylum Chordata.[5] These embryology-based insights challenged earlier adult-morphology-focused views and expanded the phylum beyond traditional vertebrates. Classification evolved from Linnaean hierarchies, which relied on observable adult similarities to organize vertebrates into classes within broader animal divisions, to 20th-century cladistic methods pioneered by Willi Hennig, which prioritize synapomorphies—shared derived traits like the notochord present across life stages—to define monophyletic groups.[13] This cladistic framework, widely adopted since the 1970s, underscores the evolutionary unity of Chordata by reconstructing phylogenies based on common ancestry rather than superficial resemblances.[5]Anatomy and Physiology
General Anatomical Features
Chordates exhibit a bilaterian body plan characterized by bilateral symmetry and triploblastic organization, with a distinct anteroposterior axis and cephalization in more derived forms.[13] This plan often includes metameric segmentation, particularly evident in the arrangement of muscle blocks known as myomeres, which facilitate coordinated body movements.[14] The notochord, a flexible rod-like structure composed of vacuolated cells surrounded by a fibrous sheath, runs along the dorsal midline and serves as a primary skeletal element, providing hydrostatic support and a foundation for the development of an endoskeleton in vertebrates through the formation of vertebral precursors.[15] In basal chordates, the notochord persists as the main axial support, enabling elongation and flexibility essential for locomotion.[16] The circulatory system in chordates varies but shares a basic pattern of fluid propulsion along the body axis. In tunicates, it is an open system lacking true capillaries, where a simple tubular heart exhibits reversing peristaltic contractions to circulate hemolymph through lacunae and sinuses.[17] In cephalochordates, it is a closed system without a true heart but with a contractile subintestinal vessel that propels colorless blood forward in ventral vessels and backward in the dorsal aorta.[18] Vertebrates, in contrast, possess a closed circulatory system with a multi-chambered heart that evolved from this ancestral pulsatile tube, ensuring efficient oxygen and nutrient delivery under higher pressures.[19] Respiratory adaptations center on pharyngeal slits, perforations in the pharyngeal wall that originally facilitated filter-feeding by creating a current for particle capture, while also enabling gas exchange through diffusion across thin epithelia in aquatic environments.[20] The muscular system features segmental myomeres—W-shaped blocks of striated muscle separated by connective tissue myosepta—that contract sequentially to produce undulating waves for propulsion, a mechanism conserved across chordate lineages for efficient swimming.[21] Sensory and support structures derive primarily from the dorsal hollow nerve cord, a tubular assemblage of neural tissue that forms the central nervous system and contrasts with the ventral solid nerve cords of other bilaterians.[22] In basal chordates, this cord lacks extensive anterior enlargement but includes sensory receptors for light, pressure, and chemical cues, with precursors to brain regions emerging at the anterior end to integrate environmental signals.[22] The notochord additionally supports neural tube formation by providing midline signaling cues during development.[16] These anatomical features integrate to support key physiological functions across diverse habitats. The notochord and myomeres together enable powerful undulatory locomotion, allowing chordates to navigate marine and freshwater environments with energy-efficient thrust generation.[21] Pharyngeal slits not only aid in suspension feeding by trapping plankton but also contribute to osmoregulation through selective ion transport, maintaining internal balance in varying salinities.[20] The dorsal nerve cord coordinates these processes, linking sensory input to motor output for adaptive behaviors such as predator avoidance and resource acquisition.[22]Developmental Biology
Chordate development is characterized by early embryonic processes that establish the defining traits of the phylum, beginning with gastrulation where the blastula invaginates to form the three germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. During gastrulation, the archenteron forms as the primary gut cavity, with mesodermal cells ingressing to position precursors for the notochord and somites. In model chordates like the ascidian Ciona intestinalis, this stage involves rapid cell divisions transitioning to morphogenetic movements, setting the stage for axial elongation.[23] Neurulation follows, where the dorsal ectoderm thickens into a neural plate that invaginates to form the neural tube, the precursor to the central nervous system; this process is conserved across chordates and relies on precise coordination of cell cycle progression, including a prolonged G2 phase in epidermal cells to facilitate tube closure without disrupting morphogenesis.[23] The notochord arises from axial mesoderm induced during gastrulation, serving as a signaling center that induces neural tube formation through secreted factors.[24] Pharyngeal development in chordates involves the evagination of endodermal pouches from the anterior archenteron, which perforate to form pharyngeal slits, a process regulated by conserved genes such as Pax1/9, Eya, Six, and Tbx1. These slits emerge as simple perforations in basal chordates like amphioxus, providing structural support via endodermal tissues, and represent an ancestral deuterostome feature adapted for filter-feeding and respiration. Concurrently, tail development proceeds through somitogenesis, where paraxial mesoderm segments into somites along the posterior axis, contributing to the post-anal tail's musculature and skeletal elements; in vertebrates, this involves a presomitic mesoderm clock driven by Notch and Wnt signaling, while cephalochordates exhibit similar segmentation from tailbud mesoderm. The post-anal tail extends beyond the anus, formed by heterogeneous cell populations in the tailbud, including neural tube, notochord, and myotomes, enabling propulsion in larval stages.[20][25] Central to these processes are key genetic pathways, including Hox gene clusters that direct anterior-posterior (A-P) patterning through collinear expression along the body axis, specifying regional identities in the neural tube and mesoderm from gastrulation onward; this combinatorial code is conserved across chordates and modulated by retinoic acid gradients. The T-box transcription factor Brachyury (Bra) plays a pivotal role in notochord specification, acting downstream of vegetal FGF signaling to activate notochord genes in synergy with factors like Foxa.a, forming a feed-forward regulatory network essential for mesodermal differentiation into notochord tissue.[26][27] Developmental strategies vary among chordate subphyla, with urochordates exhibiting indirect development featuring a free-swimming tadpole larva that undergoes metamorphosis into a sessile adult, involving thyroid hormone-mediated remodeling where chordate traits like the notochord and tail are resorbed. In contrast, cephalochordates display direct development without a pronounced larval phase or metamorphosis, progressing smoothly from embryo to juvenile while retaining chordate features throughout. These differences highlight evolutionary adaptations in life history, with metamorphosis likely ancestral to chordates but modified or lost in lineages like vertebrates.[28]Classification and Taxonomy
Taxonomic Framework
The phylum Chordata is classified within the superphylum Deuterostomia, alongside the phyla Echinodermata and Hemichordata, based on shared developmental features such as radial cleavage and enterocoely.[29] This phylum encompasses approximately 80,000 described species as of 2025, predominantly marine but with significant terrestrial and freshwater diversity. Chordata is traditionally divided into three subphyla—Cephalochordata, Urochordata, and Vertebrata—differentiated primarily by the persistence and extent of the notochord, as well as the presence or absence of a developed head structure.[13] In Cephalochordata and Urochordata, classified as non-craniates, the notochord is either limited to the tail region or transient during larval stages, and a distinct head is lacking; in contrast, Vertebrata, the craniates, feature a notochord that is largely replaced by a vertebral column and includes a well-developed cranium enclosing the brain.[13] Within the subphylum Vertebrata, taxonomic ranks include the paraphyletic superclass Agnatha, comprising jawless fishes such as lampreys and hagfishes, and the monophyletic superclass Gnathostomata, which includes all jawed vertebrates from cartilaginous fishes to tetrapods. Contemporary chordate classification has shifted toward cladistic methods, emphasizing monophyletic groups defined by shared derived (synapomorphic) traits and phylogenetic analyses, rather than solely traditional morphological hierarchies that sometimes grouped unrelated forms. Molecular data from genomic sequencing has prompted recent nomenclature revisions, notably the establishment of the Olfactores clade, which groups Urochordata and Vertebrata as sister taxa to the outgroup Cephalochordata, supported by evidence from gene expression patterns and conserved developmental genes.Major Subphyla Overview
The chordate phylum is divided into three major subphyla: Cephalochordata, Urochordata, and Vertebrata, each exhibiting distinct defining features, levels of diversity, and ecological contributions while sharing core chordate traits like a notochord, dorsal hollow nerve cord, pharyngeal slits, and post-anal tail at some life stage.[2] These subphyla represent a spectrum from simple, invertebrate forms to complex vertebrates, with basal groups primarily confined to marine environments where they serve as key filter-feeders in benthic and pelagic ecosystems, facilitating nutrient cycling and supporting food webs.[2] In contrast, Vertebrata dominates diverse habitats, including terrestrial ones, through adaptive radiations that underpin global biodiversity and ecological stability.[30] Cephalochordata, comprising approximately 30 species as of 2025, includes small, fish-like filter-feeders such as the lancelet Branchiostoma, which inhabit shallow marine sediments worldwide.[31] These organisms retain a persistent notochord throughout life without developing vertebrae, emphasizing their primitive chordate morphology.[32] Ecologically, cephalochordates play a vital role as benthic filter-feeders, siphoning plankton and organic particles to contribute to sediment aeration and nutrient remineralization in coastal ecosystems.[33] Urochordata encompasses around 3,000 species of tunicates as of 2025, featuring sessile ascidians that attach to substrates and planktonic larvaceans that drift in open waters.[34] Characteristic of this subphylum are tadpole-like larvae with a temporary notochord and the secretion of a cellulose tunic for protection, which is lost or modified in adults.[35] Urochordates function as efficient marine filter-feeders, clearing water of microorganisms and serving as prey for higher trophic levels, thus maintaining water quality and supporting pelagic food chains.[36] Vertebrata, the most diverse subphylum with approximately 70,000-75,000 species as of 2025, is defined by the presence of a cranium enclosing the brain and neural crest cells that give rise to diverse cell types, spanning jawless fishes like lampreys to mammals. Unlike the other subphyla, the notochord is largely replaced by a vertebral column in adults, enabling structural support for active lifestyles.[37] Vertebrates dominate terrestrial and aquatic habitats, fulfilling roles from primary consumers in oceans to apex predators on land, driving ecosystem dynamics through predation, pollination, and seed dispersal.[30] Comparatively, Urochordata and Vertebrata lose the notochord in adulthood, contrasting with the persistent structure in Cephalochordata, which underscores evolutionary shifts toward specialization.[2] Basal subphyla like Cephalochordata and Urochordata are overwhelmingly marine, reinforcing oceanic biodiversity, while Vertebrata's expansion into terrestrial realms highlights their adaptive versatility across environments.[2]Diversity of Subphyla
Cephalochordata
Cephalochordates, commonly known as lancelets or amphioxus, are small, benthic marine animals that exemplify the primitive chordate body plan, retaining key diagnostic traits such as a notochord, dorsal nerve cord, pharyngeal slits, and post-anal tail throughout their lives.[33] Their morphology features a slender, translucent, fish-like body, typically 5-8 cm long, with a pointed rostrum at the anterior end and a tapered tail, lacking paired fins, jaws, or a distinct head.[2] The body is laterally compressed, segmented by V-shaped myomeres, and includes an atrium enclosing the pharynx with over 100 gill slits for filter-feeding.[33] Feeding occurs through an oral hood equipped with cirri that act as an incurrent siphon to draw in water containing plankton, while mucus traps particles on the gill slits, and water exits via an excurrent atriopore near the tail.[38] Lancelets inhabit shallow, coastal marine environments worldwide, from tropical to temperate regions, where they burrow tail-first into sandy or muddy sediments, leaving only their anterior end exposed for feeding.[33] Densities can reach up to 5,000 individuals per square meter in suitable substrates, such as those in the Caribbean or Mediterranean.[33] Ecologically, they serve as detritivores and filter-feeders, recycling nutrients in benthic communities by processing phytoplankton and zooplankton, and they form a food source for larger marine organisms and, in some Asian regions, for human consumption.[39] Their global distribution spans three genera—Branchiostoma, Asymmetron, and Epigonichthys—with about 30-35 described species adapted to soft-bottom habitats.[38] Reproduction in cephalochordates is gonochoristic, with separate sexes predominant, though rare hermaphroditism occurs in some populations; spawning is seasonal, typically in spring or summer, triggered by lunar cycles and occurring at dusk.[38] Gametes are released into the water column for external fertilization, yielding free-swimming, planktonic larvae that resemble miniature adults and drift for weeks to months before metamorphosing and settling into the sediment as juveniles.[33] Lifespans vary by species, ranging from 2-3 years in Branchiostoma floridae to 5-8 years in B. lanceolatum.[38] As the sister group to the Olfactores (urochordates and vertebrates) within Chordata, cephalochordates like Branchiostoma floridae serve as key model organisms for evolutionary developmental biology, particularly through genome sequencing that illuminates the ancestral chordate genome and the origins of vertebrate innovations.[5][40] The 2008 sequencing of the amphioxus genome revealed a lack of whole-genome duplications seen in vertebrates, highlighting conserved gene families and regulatory elements that underpin chordate body plan evolution.[41] Subsequent studies, including CRISPR-based gene editing, have leveraged this to explore primitive neural and mesodermal patterning, providing insights into how vertebrate-specific traits arose from a basal chordate ancestor.[38]Urochordata
Urochordata, commonly known as tunicates, represent a diverse group of marine invertebrates within the phylum Chordata, characterized by their sac-like bodies enclosed in a protective outer covering. This subphylum encompasses approximately 3,000 species, predominantly found in oceanic environments from shallow coastal waters to the deep sea. Tunicates exhibit a range of lifestyles, from sessile to planktonic, and play significant roles in marine ecosystems as filter feeders. Their classification into three primary classes—Ascidiacea, Thaliacea, and Larvacea—reflects distinct adaptations to these habitats.[42] The class Ascidiacea, often referred to as sea squirts, comprises the majority of tunicate species and features sessile adults that attach to substrates such as rocks, docks, or seafloor debris. These organisms typically form solitary individuals or colonial aggregates, with adults reaching sizes from a few millimeters to over 10 centimeters. In contrast, Thaliacea includes pelagic forms like salps, doliolids, and pyrosomes, which are gelatinous, barrel-shaped swimmers that propel themselves through jet-like contractions of their bodies. Larvacea, also known as Appendicularia, consists of small, planktonic species that retain a larval-like morphology throughout life, secreting a mucous "house" for feeding and protection. These classes highlight the subphylum's ecological versatility, with Ascidiacea dominating benthic communities and Thaliacea and Larvacea contributing to open-ocean plankton.[42][43] A defining feature of urochordates is the tunic, an outer secretion composed primarily of cellulose—a polysaccharide rare among animals—embedded with proteins, sulfated polysaccharides, and other compounds, providing structural support and defense against predators and desiccation. This tunic encases the body, leaving openings for two siphons: the oral siphon for ingesting water and the atrial siphon for expelling filtered water and waste. Water enters via the oral siphon, passes through the pharynx lined with gill slits for particle capture, and exits the atrial siphon, facilitating suspension feeding on plankton and detritus. Notably, the characteristic chordate traits—notochord, dorsal hollow nerve cord, pharyngeal slits, and post-anal tail—are prominent only in the free-swimming tadpole-like larva, which undergoes metamorphosis to a sessile or pelagic adult, often losing the notochord and tail.[44][45][46] Reproduction in Urochordata combines asexual and sexual strategies, enhancing dispersal and population resilience. Asexual reproduction via budding is prevalent in colonial Ascidiacea, where new individuals develop from body tissues, forming interconnected zooids that share a common tunic; this process allows rapid colony expansion in favorable environments. Sexual reproduction involves hermaphroditic adults releasing gametes into the water, with fertilization yielding tadpole larvae that swim for hours to days before settling and metamorphosing. These larvae, equipped with sensory organs for substrate detection, ensure wide dispersal across marine currents. Thaliacea often alternate between sexual and asexual generations, with chains of budded individuals in asexual phases, while Larvacea reproduce sexually but maintain a perpetual larval form.[47][48][49] Ecologically, tunicates serve as key grazers in marine food webs, filtering vast quantities of phytoplankton and zooplankton—up to thousands of liters of water per individual daily—transferring primary production to higher trophic levels as prey for fish, seabirds, and invertebrates. However, many species, particularly invasive Ascidiacea, act as fouling organisms, adhering to ship hulls, aquaculture gear, and artificial structures, which increases drag, damages equipment, and facilitates non-native species spread via maritime transport. Such biofouling can disrupt local ecosystems by outcompeting native filter feeders and altering benthic community structure. Urochordata, together with Vertebrata, form the clade Olfactores, sister to Cephalochordata in chordate phylogeny, underscoring their evolutionary significance.[50][51][5][52]Vertebrata
Vertebrata, also known as Craniata, represent the most diverse and advanced subphylum within Chordata, encompassing animals that possess a cranium or skull enclosing the brain, a defining feature that distinguishes them from other chordates. This skull, composed of cartilage or bone, provides protection for the central nervous system and supports sensory organs, marking a key evolutionary innovation in craniate development. Additionally, vertebrates are characterized by the presence of neural crest cells, a unique embryonic cell population that arises from the dorsal neural tube and migrates to form critical craniofacial structures such as bones, cartilage, ganglia, and pigment cells. Unlike the persistent notochord in other chordates, the vertebrate notochord is largely replaced by a vertebral column, a segmented series of bony or cartilaginous vertebrae that encases and protects the spinal cord while providing structural support for the body. These features collectively enable greater cephalization, or concentration of sensory and neural tissues in the head, facilitating complex behaviors and adaptations. The major groups within Vertebrata are broadly divided into jawless and jawed forms, reflecting significant evolutionary transitions. Jawless vertebrates, classified as cyclostomes, include lampreys and hagfish, which retain primitive traits such as a cartilaginous skeleton and lack paired fins, but possess a cranium and rudimentary vertebrae. Jawed vertebrates, or gnathostomes, comprise the vast majority and include cartilaginous fishes (e.g., sharks and rays), bony fishes (osteichthyans), and tetrapods, with jaws evolving from gill arches to enable efficient feeding and predation. Among gnathostomes, a pivotal transition occurred in sarcopterygians (lobe-finned fishes), where robust fins with internal bones gradually evolved into weight-bearing limbs, allowing early tetrapods like amphibians to venture onto land during the Devonian period. Further diversification led to amniotes—reptiles, birds, and mammals—which developed amniotic eggs and other adaptations for fully terrestrial life, including waterproof skin and efficient lungs. Vertebrate diversity spans aquatic, terrestrial, and aerial environments, with approximately 66,000 described species demonstrating remarkable adaptability. Aquatic vertebrates, primarily fishes, dominate in number and inhabit diverse marine and freshwater ecosystems, while terrestrial forms include amphibians that bridge aquatic and land habitats, reptiles adapted to arid conditions, and endothermic birds and mammals that achieve aerial flight or high-energy lifestyles. Sensory advancements underpin this radiation, including paired eyes with image-forming capabilities derived from lateral eye fields, enabling stereoscopic vision and color perception in many species, and sophisticated inner ears that provide balance, hearing, and orientation through semicircular canals and otoliths. These sensory innovations, honed over millions of years, support navigation, foraging, and predator avoidance across habitats. As the dominant chordate subphylum, vertebrates hold profound economic and medical importance to humans, serving as sources of food through fisheries and livestock that support global agriculture and nutrition. Medically, non-human vertebrates are essential model organisms in biomedical research, contributing to breakthroughs in understanding diseases, developing vaccines, and advancing treatments for conditions like cancer and diabetes via studies on physiology and genetics.Phylogeny and Evolution
Phylogenetic Relationships
The phylogenetic relationships within Chordata are characterized by a basal position for Cephalochordata, with Olfactores—comprising Urochordata (tunicates) and Vertebrata—as its sister clade.[53] This structure positions cephalochordates, such as amphioxus, as the outgroup to the more derived Olfactores, reflecting an early divergence that shapes the evolutionary tree of living chordates. Recent genomic sequencing of the early-diverging cephalochordate Asymmetron amphioxus (2025) further supports this basal position, offering insights into ancestral chordate genome organization.[54] Within Vertebrata, cyclostomes (lampreys and hagfish) form a monophyletic group at the base, sister to the gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates), supported by genomic analyses revealing shared ancestral features like the absence of certain gnathostome-specific innovations.[55] This cladogram underscores the progression from simple lancelet-like forms to the complex vertebrate lineage. Molecular phylogenomics provides robust evidence for these relationships, drawing from large-scale datasets including 18S rRNA sequences and multigene analyses that consistently recover Cephalochordata as sister to Olfactores with high bootstrap support.[29] Hox gene clusters further corroborate this topology, as cephalochordates retain a single, intact cluster resembling the ancestral chordate condition, while tunicates and vertebrates exhibit duplications and rearrangements indicative of their closer affinity.[56] Morphological synapomorphies, such as pharyngeal pouches and slits, unite all chordates but show derived modifications in Olfactores, like the elaboration of these structures into gills or jaws in vertebrates, reinforcing the molecular tree.[20] Prior to widespread molecular data in the late 1990s and 2000s, alternative hypotheses prevailed based on morphology, often placing Urochordata as the basal chordate group or even aligning them more closely with non-chordate invertebrates due to their sessile adult forms and apparent simplicity.[57] These views, rooted in 19th- and early 20th-century embryological studies, suggested Cephalochordata as sister to Vertebrata, with tunicates as a primitive offshoot; however, phylogenomic studies using nuclear genes and mitochondrial genomes resolved tunicates as vertebrate sisters, highlighting secondary simplifications in urochordate body plans. This paradigm shift emphasized the derived nature of tunicate morphology, aligning with evo-devo insights. Divergence time estimates, calibrated via molecular clocks and fossil constraints, place the origin of crown-group chordates in the early Cambrian, approximately 550 million years ago (Ma), coinciding with the split between Cephalochordata and Olfactores.[58] The subsequent radiation within Olfactores occurred between 550 and 520 Ma, setting the stage for vertebrate diversification amid the Cambrian explosion of animal life.[53] These timelines integrate relaxed clock models with paleontological data, providing a framework for understanding chordate evolutionary dynamics.Evolutionary History and Fossil Record
The earliest known fossils suggestive of chordates date to the Early Cambrian Chengjiang biota in Yunnan Province, China, approximately 520 million years ago (Mya), where soft-bodied forms like Yunnanozoon exhibit a notochord-like structure and pharyngeal slits, positioning them as potential stem-chordates or primitive vertebrates. Similarly, Haikouichthys from the same biota displays vertebrate-like features, including a cranium, segmental muscle blocks, and a post-anal tail, marking it as one of the oldest putative vertebrates.[59] A 2024 reinterpretation of Pikaia from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale (~508 Mya) confirms key chordate features, including a dorsal nerve cord and gut canal, strengthening evidence for early chordate body plan evolution.[60] Additionally, in 2024, the soft-bodied stem-vertebrate Nuucichthys rhynchocephalus was described from the Drumian Marjum Formation in Utah (~505 Mya), expanding the known diversity of Cambrian chordates in the Great Basin. These lagerstätten provide exceptional preservation of soft tissues, offering critical insights into basal chordate anatomy otherwise absent from the record. Major evolutionary events in chordate history include the Ordovician radiation of jawless fishes (agnathans), around 485–443 Mya, when ostracoderms and other armored forms diversified in nearshore marine environments, adapting to filter-feeding and detritivory amid rising sea levels and nutrient availability.[61] The Devonian period (419–359 Mya) witnessed the emergence of tetrapods from sarcopterygian fish ancestors, with fossils like Tiktaalik and early amphibians such as Ichthyostega demonstrating transitional limb and skeletal adaptations for shallow-water locomotion and eventual terrestrial incursion.[62] Amniote diversification accelerated in the Mesozoic (252–66 Mya), following their Late Carboniferous origins, as synapsids and sauropsids radiated into diverse terrestrial niches, including the rise of dinosaurs and early mammals, driven by ecological opportunities post-Permian extinction.[63] Significant gaps persist in the chordate fossil record, particularly for soft-bodied basal forms, due to taphonomic biases favoring hard-part preservation, which obscures the full diversity of early chordates before the Cambrian Explosion.[64] Molecular clock analyses, calibrated against fossil data, indicate that chordate lineages may have diverged in the pre-Cambrian Ediacaran period (>541 Mya), potentially over 100 million years earlier than the oldest macrofossils suggest, highlighting discrepancies between genetic divergence times and paleontological evidence.[65] Key extinctions and adaptations shaped chordate trajectories, notably the Late Devonian decline of placoderms around 359 Mya, coinciding with the Kellwasser and Hangenberg events that eliminated many armored jawed fishes, possibly due to anoxic episodes and competition from more agile chondrichthyans and osteichthyans.[66] Rising atmospheric oxygen levels during the Paleozoic, from ~10% to 30% by the Devonian, facilitated increases in body size and metabolic demands, enabling the evolution of larger, more active chordates like early tetrapods and contributing to their ecological dominance.[67]Relationships to Other Animal Groups
Closest Non-Chordate Relatives
The closest non-chordate relatives of chordates are the hemichordates and echinoderms, which together form the clade Ambulacraria, the sister group to Chordata within the deuterostomes.[68] This relationship is supported by phylogenomic analyses that resolve Ambulacraria as monophyletic and closely allied to chordates based on shared developmental and genetic features.[69] Hemichordates, comprising the classes Enteropneusta (acorn worms) and Pterobranchia (pterobranchs), exhibit several traits reminiscent of chordates, including pharyngeal gill slits used for filter feeding and respiration.[70] Their tornaria larvae, which are free-swimming and possess a ciliated band for locomotion and feeding, closely resemble the auricularia larvae of echinoderms and share developmental similarities with early chordate stages, such as those of amphioxus.[71] Echinoderms, including familiar forms like starfish (Asteroidea) and sea urchins (Echinoidea), display bilateral symmetry in their planktonic larvae, which undergo metamorphosis to develop the characteristic pentaradial symmetry of adults.[5] This radial symmetry supports a unique water vascular system—a network of fluid-filled canals and tube feet—that facilitates locomotion, feeding, and gas exchange, marking a key adaptation distinct from chordate body plans.[72] Ambulacrarians and chordates share deuterostome characteristics, such as enterocoelic coelom formation, where the coelom arises from mesodermal pouches evaginating from the archenteron during embryogenesis.[13] Genetic homologies further unite them, including conserved BMP signaling pathways that pattern the dorsoventral axis; in hemichordates, BMP activity establishes ventral identity and represses neural development, mirroring its role in chordates but with an inverted orientation relative to the ectoderm.[73] Despite these similarities, ambulacrarians lack defining chordate features like a notochord and a dorsal hollow nerve cord; instead, hemichordates possess a ventral nerve cord, and echinoderms have a decentralized nervous system without a centralized cord.[5] These differences highlight the divergence within deuterostomes while underscoring the common ancestry of Ambulacraria and Chordata.[69]Broader Deuterostome Context
Deuterostomes are defined by key embryological features, including the formation of the anus from the blastopore while the mouth develops secondarily from a separate invagination, radial cleavage of the zygote, and indeterminate cell fate during early development, where isolated blastomeres can give rise to complete larvae.[74] These traits distinguish deuterostomes from protostomes, in which the blastopore typically becomes the mouth and cleavage is spiral and determinate.[75] Coelom formation occurs via enterocoely, with mesodermal pouches budding from the archenteron.[75] The deuterostome clade encompasses four extant phyla—Chordata, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, and Xenoturbellida—along with extinct lineages such as Vetulicolia. Xenoturbellida comprises simple, sac-like marine worms lacking a coelom, gut, or gonads, yet sharing molecular affinities with other deuterostomes. Vetulicolia, known from Cambrian fossils, represents a possible stem-group deuterostome, with specimens showing pharyngeal structures resembling gill slits that parallel early chordate anatomy.[76] Deuterostomes diverged from protostomes around 600 million years ago in the late Ediacaran, marking a pivotal event in bilaterian evolution. This common ancestor likely possessed a diffuse nervous system, as seen in modern echinoderms with their decentralized nerve nets and radial symmetry in adults, in contrast to the centralized, tubular nervous system that evolved within the chordate lineage.[77] Such innovations highlight how deuterostome diversity arose from a shared developmental framework, influencing bilaterian body plan variations through modifications in gene regulatory networks.[78] Whole-genome analyses have historically supported deuterostome monophyly by identifying conserved syntenic regions and orthologous genes, such as those involved in dorsoventral patterning, that unite the clade and illuminate bilaterian origins from a common ancestor with modular genetic toolkits. However, recent phylogenomic studies using large-scale datasets have revealed weak branch support for this grouping, attributing traditional monophyly signals to systematic biases like long-branch attraction or incomplete lineage sorting, prompting reevaluation of deuterostome relationships.[79] As of 2025, further analyses suggest that the deuterostome clade may be an artifact of these errors, with support diminishing when biases are mitigated.[80]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chordata

