Hubbry Logo
SurgerySurgeryMain
Open search
Surgery
Community hub
Surgery
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Surgery
Surgery
Surgery
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Surgeons conducting operations

Surgery[a] is a medical specialty that uses manual and instrumental techniques to diagnose or treat pathological conditions (e.g., trauma, disease, injury, malignancy), to alter bodily functions (e.g., malabsorption created by bariatric surgery such as gastric bypass), to reconstruct or alter aesthetics and appearance (cosmetic surgery), or to remove unwanted tissues, neoplasms, or foreign bodies.

The act of performing surgery may be called a surgical procedure or surgical operation, or simply "surgery" or "operation". In this context, the verb "operate" means to perform surgery. The adjective surgical means pertaining to surgery; e.g. surgical instruments, surgical facility or surgical nurse. Most surgical procedures are performed by a pair of operators: a surgeon who is the main operator performing the surgery, and a surgical assistant who provides in-procedure manual assistance during surgery. Modern surgical operations typically require a surgical team that typically consists of the surgeon, the surgical assistant, an anaesthetist (often also complemented by an anaesthetic nurse), a scrub nurse (who handles sterile equipment), a circulating nurse and a surgical technologist, while procedures that mandate cardiopulmonary bypass will also have a perfusionist. All surgical procedures are considered invasive and often require a period of postoperative care (sometimes intensive care) for the patient to recover from the iatrogenic trauma inflicted by the procedure. The duration of surgery can span from several minutes to tens of hours depending on the specialty, the nature of the condition, the target body parts involved and the circumstance of each procedure, but most surgeries are designed to be one-off interventions that are typically not intended as an ongoing or repeated type of treatment.

In British colloquialism, the term "surgery" can also refer to the facility where surgery is performed, or simply the office/clinic of a physician,[1] dentist or veterinarian.[2]

Definitions

[edit]
Surgery underway at the Red Cross Hospital in Tampere, Finland during the 1918 Finnish Civil War.

As a general rule, a procedure is considered surgical when it involves cutting of a person's tissues or closure of a previously sustained wound. Other procedures that do not necessarily fall under this rubric, such as angioplasty or endoscopy, may be considered surgery if they involve "common" surgical procedure or settings, such as use of antiseptic measures and sterile fields, sedation/anesthesia, proactive hemostasis, typical surgical instruments, suturing or stapling. All forms of surgery are considered invasive procedures; the so-called "noninvasive surgery" ought to be more appropriately called minimally invasive procedures, which usually refers to a procedure that utilizes natural orifices (e.g. most urological procedures) or does not penetrate the structure being excised (e.g. endoscopic polyp excision, rubber band ligation, laser eye surgery), are percutaneous (e.g. arthroscopy, catheter ablation, angioplasty and valvuloplasty), or to a radiosurgical procedure (e.g. irradiation of a tumor).[citation needed]

Types of surgery

[edit]

Surgical procedures are commonly categorized by urgency, type of procedure, body system involved, the degree of invasiveness, and special instrumentation.

  • Based on timing:[citation needed]
    • Elective surgery is done to correct a non-life-threatening condition, and is carried out at the person's convenience, or to the surgeon's and the surgical facility's availability.
    • Semi-elective surgery is one that is better done early to avoid complications or potential deterioration of the patient's condition, but such risk are sufficiently low that the procedure can be postponed for a short period time.
    • Emergency surgery is surgery which must be done without any delay to prevent death or serious disabilities or loss of limbs and functions.
  • Based on purpose:[citation needed]
    • Exploratory surgery is performed to establish or aid a diagnosis.
    • Therapeutic surgery is performed to treat a previously diagnosed condition.
      • Curative surgery is a therapeutic procedure done to permanently remove a pathology.
    • Plastic surgery is done to improve a body part's function or appearance.
    • Bariatric surgery is done to assist weight loss when dietary and pharmaceutical methods alone have failed.
    • Non-survival surgery, or terminal surgery, is where Euthanasia is performed while the subject is under Anesthesia so that the subject will not regain conscious pain perception.[5] This type of surgery is usually done in Animal testing experiments.[6]

Terminology

[edit]
Main article: List of surgical procedures
  • Resection and excisional procedures start with a prefix for the target organ to be excised (cut out) and end in the suffix -ectomy. For example, removal of part of the stomach would be called a subtotal gastrectomy.
  • Procedures involving cutting into an organ or tissue end in -otomy. A surgical procedure cutting through the abdominal wall to gain access to the abdominal cavity is a laparotomy.
  • Minimally invasive procedures, involving small incisions through which an endoscope is inserted, end in -oscopy. For example, such surgery in the abdominal cavity is called laparoscopy.
  • Procedures for formation of a permanent or semi-permanent opening called a stoma in the body end in -ostomy, such as creation of a colostomy, a connection of colon and the abdominal wall. This prefix is also used for connection between two viscera, such as how an esophagojejunostomy refers to a connection created between the esophagus and the jejunum.
  • Plastic and reconstruction procedures start with the name for the body part to be reconstructed and end in -plasty. For example, rhino- is a prefix meaning "nose", therefore a rhinoplasty is a reconstructive or cosmetic surgery for the nose. A pyloroplasty refers to a type of reconstruction of the gastric pylorus.
  • Procedures that involve cutting the muscular layers of an organ end in -myotomy. A pyloromyotomy refers to cutting the muscular layers of the gastric pylorus.
  • Repair of a damaged or abnormal structure ends in -orraphy. This includes herniorrhaphy, another name for a hernia repair.
  • Reoperation, revision, or "redo" procedures refer to a planned or unplanned return to the operating theater after a surgery is performed to re-address an aspect of patient care. Unplanned reasons for reoperation include postoperative complications such as bleeding or hematoma formation, development of a seroma or abscess, anastomotic leak, tissue necrosis requiring debridement or excision, or in the case of malignancy, close or involved resection margins that may require re-excision to avoid local recurrence. Reoperation can be performed in the acute phase, or it can be also performed months to years later if the surgery failed to solve the indicated problem. Reoperation can also be planned as a staged operation where components of the procedure are performed or reversed under separate anesthesia.

Description of surgical procedure

[edit]

Setting

[edit]

Inpatient surgery is performed in a hospital, and the person undergoing surgery stays at least one night in the hospital after the surgery. Outpatient surgery occurs in a hospital outpatient department or freestanding ambulatory surgery center, and the person who had surgery is discharged the same working day.[9] Office-based surgery occurs in a physician's office, and the person is discharged the same day.[10]

At a hospital, modern surgery is often performed in an operating theater using surgical instruments, an operating table, and other equipment. Among United States hospitalizations for non-maternal and non-neonatal conditions in 2012, more than one-fourth of stays and half of hospital costs involved stays that included operating room (OR) procedures.[11] The environment and procedures used in surgery are governed by the principles of aseptic technique: the strict separation of "sterile" (free of microorganisms) things from "unsterile" or "contaminated" things. All surgical instruments must be sterilized, and an instrument must be replaced or re-sterilized if it becomes contaminated (i.e. handled in an unsterile manner, or allowed to touch an unsterile surface). Operating room staff must wear sterile attire (scrubs, a scrub cap, a sterile surgical gown, sterile latex or non-latex polymer gloves and a surgical mask), and they must scrub hands and arms with an approved disinfectant agent before each procedure.

Preoperative care

[edit]
Main article: Preoperative care

Prior to surgery, the person is given a medical examination, receives certain pre-operative tests, and their physical status is rated according to the ASA physical status classification system. If these results are satisfactory, the person requiring surgery signs a consent form and is given a surgical clearance. If the procedure is expected to result in significant blood loss, an autologous blood donation may be made some weeks prior to surgery. If the surgery involves the digestive system, the person requiring surgery may be instructed to perform a bowel prep by drinking a solution of polyethylene glycol the night before the procedure. People preparing for surgery are also instructed to abstain from food or drink (an NPO order after midnight on the night before the procedure), to minimize the effect of stomach contents on pre-operative medications and reduce the risk of aspiration if the person vomits during or after the procedure.[12]

Some medical systems have a practice of routinely performing chest x-rays before surgery. The premise behind this practice is that the physician might discover some unknown medical condition which would complicate the surgery, and that upon discovering this with the chest x-ray, the physician would adapt the surgery practice accordingly.[13] However, medical specialty professional organizations recommend against routine pre-operative chest x-rays for people who have an unremarkable medical history and presented with a physical exam which did not indicate a chest x-ray.[13] Routine x-ray examination is more likely to result in problems like misdiagnosis, overtreatment, or other negative outcomes than it is to result in a benefit to the person.[13] Likewise, other tests including complete blood count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, basic metabolic panel, and urinalysis should not be done unless the results of these tests can help evaluate surgical risk.[14]

Preparing for surgery

[edit]

A surgical team may include a surgeon, anesthetist, a circulating nurse, and a "scrub tech", or surgical technician, as well as other assistants who provide equipment and supplies as required. While informed consent discussions may be performed in a clinic or acute care setting, the pre-operative holding area is where documentation is reviewed and where family members can also meet the surgical team. Nurses in the preoperative holding area confirm orders and answer additional questions of the family members of the patient prior to surgery. In the pre-operative holding area, the person preparing for surgery changes out of their street clothes and are asked to confirm the details of his or her surgery as previously discussed during the process of informed consent. A set of vital signs are recorded, a peripheral IV line is placed, and pre-operative medications (antibiotics, sedatives, etc.) are given.[15]

When the patient enters the operating room and is appropriately anesthetized, the team will then position the patient in an appropriate surgical position. If hair is present at the surgical site, it is clipped (instead of shaving). The skin surface within the operating field is cleansed and prepared by applying an antiseptic (typically chlorhexidine gluconate in alcohol, as this is twice as effective as povidone-iodine at reducing the risk of infection).[16] Sterile drapes are then used to cover the borders of the operating field. Depending on the type of procedure, the cephalad drapes are secured to a pair of poles near the head of the bed to form an "ether screen", which separate the anesthetist/anesthesiologist's working area (unsterile) from the surgical site (sterile).[17]

Anesthesia is administered to prevent pain from the trauma of cutting, tissue manipulation, application of thermal energy, and suturing. Depending on the type of operation, anesthesia may be provided locally, regionally, or as general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia may be used when the surgical site is too large or deep for a local block, but general anesthesia may not be desirable. With local and spinal anesthesia, the surgical site is anesthetized, but the person can remain conscious or minimally sedated. In contrast, general anesthesia may render the person unconscious and paralyzed during surgery. The person is typically intubated to protect their airway and placed on a mechanical ventilator, and anesthesia is produced by a combination of injected and inhaled agents. The choice of surgical method and anesthetic technique aims to solve the indicated problem, minimize the risk of complications, optimize the time needed for recovery, and limit the surgical stress response.

Intraoperative phase

[edit]

The intraoperative phase begins when the surgery subject is received in the surgical area (such as the operating theater or surgical department), and lasts until the subject is transferred to a recovery area (such as a post-anesthesia care unit).[18]

An incision is made to access the surgical site. Blood vessels may be clamped or cauterized to prevent bleeding, and retractors may be used to expose the site or keep the incision open. The approach to the surgical site may involve several layers of incision and dissection, as in abdominal surgery, where the incision must traverse skin, subcutaneous tissue, three layers of muscle and then the peritoneum. In certain cases, bone may be cut to further access the interior of the body; for example, cutting the skull for brain surgery or cutting the sternum for thoracic (chest) surgery to open up the rib cage. Whilst in surgery aseptic technique is used to prevent infection or further spreading of the disease. The surgeons' and assistants' hands, wrists and forearms are washed thoroughly for at least 4 minutes to prevent germs getting into the operative field, then sterile gloves are placed onto their hands. An antiseptic solution is applied to the area of the person's body that will be operated on. Sterile drapes are placed around the operative site. Surgical masks are worn by the surgical team to avoid germs on droplets of liquid from their mouths and noses from contaminating the operative site.[citation needed]

Work to correct the problem in body then proceeds. This work may involve:

  • excision – cutting out an organ, tumor,[19] or other tissue.
  • resection – partial removal of an organ or other bodily structure.[20]
  • reconnection of organs, tissues, etc., particularly if severed. Resection of organs such as intestines involves reconnection. Internal suturing or stapling may be used. Surgical connection between blood vessels or other tubular or hollow structures such as loops of intestine is called anastomosis.[21]
  • reduction – the movement or realignment of a body part to its normal position. e.g. Reduction of a broken nose involves the physical manipulation of the bone or cartilage from their displaced state back to their original position to restore normal airflow and aesthetics.[22]
  • ligation – tying off blood vessels, ducts, or "tubes".[23]
  • grafts – may be severed pieces of tissue cut from the same (or different) body or flaps of tissue still partly connected to the body but resewn for rearranging or restructuring of the area of the body in question. Although grafting is often used in cosmetic surgery, it is also used in other surgery. Grafts may be taken from one area of the person's body and inserted to another area of the body. An example is bypass surgery, where clogged blood vessels are bypassed with a graft from another part of the body. Alternatively, grafts may be from other persons, cadavers, or animals.[24]
  • insertion of prosthetic parts when needed. Pins or screws to set and hold bones may be used. Sections of bone may be replaced with prosthetic rods or other parts. Sometimes a plate is inserted to replace a damaged area of skull. Artificial hip replacement has become more common.[25] Heart pacemakers or valves may be inserted. Many other types of prostheses are used.
  • creation of a stoma, a permanent or semi-permanent opening in the body[26]
  • in transplant surgery, the donor organ (taken out of the donor's body) is inserted into the recipient's body and reconnected to the recipient in all necessary ways (blood vessels, ducts, etc.).[27]
  • arthrodesis – surgical connection of adjacent bones so the bones can grow together into one. Spinal fusion is an example of adjacent vertebrae connected allowing them to grow together into one piece.[28]
  • modifying the digestive tract in bariatric surgery for weight loss.
  • repair of a fistula, hernia, or prolapse.
  • repair according to the ICD-10-PCS, in the Medical and Surgical Section 0, root operation Q, means restoring, to the extent possible, a body part to its normal anatomic structure and function. This definition, repair, is used only when the method used to accomplish the repair is not one of the other root operations. Examples would be colostomy takedown, herniorrhaphy of a hernia, and the surgical suture of a laceration.[29]
  • other procedures, including:
  • clearing clogged ducts, blood or other vessels
  • removal of calculi (stones)
  • draining of accumulated fluids
  • debridement – removal of dead, damaged, or diseased tissue

Blood or blood expanders may be administered to compensate for blood lost during surgery. Once the procedure is complete, sutures or staples are used to close the incision. Once the incision is closed, the anesthetic agents are stopped or reversed, and the person is taken off ventilation and extubated (if general anesthesia was administered).[30]

Postoperative care

[edit]

After completion of surgery, the person is transferred to the post anesthesia care unit and closely monitored. When the person is judged to have recovered from the anesthesia, he/she is either transferred to a surgical ward elsewhere in the hospital or discharged home. During the post-operative period, the person's general function is assessed, the outcome of the procedure is assessed, and the surgical site is checked for signs of infection. There are several risk factors associated with postoperative complications, such as immune deficiency and obesity. Obesity has long been considered a risk factor for adverse post-surgical outcomes. It has been linked to many disorders such as obesity hypoventilation syndrome, atelectasis and pulmonary embolism, adverse cardiovascular effects, and wound healing complications.[31] If removable skin closures are used, they are removed after 7 to 10 days post-operatively, or after healing of the incision is well under way.[citation needed]

It is not uncommon for surgical drains to be required to remove blood or fluid from the surgical wound during recovery. Mostly these drains stay in until the volume tapers off, then they are removed. These drains can become clogged, leading to abscess.[32]

Postoperative therapy may include adjuvant treatment such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or administration of medication such as anti-rejection medication for transplants. For postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), solutions like saline, water, controlled breathing placebo and aromatherapy can be used in addition to medication.[33] Other follow-up studies or rehabilitation may be prescribed during and after the recovery period. A recent post-operative care philosophy has been early ambulation. Ambulation is getting the patient moving around. This can be as simple as sitting up or even walking around. The goal is to get the patient moving as early as possible. It has been found to shorten the patient's length of stay. Length of stay is the amount of time a patient spends in the hospital after surgery before they are discharged. In a recent study[34] done with lumbar decompressions, the patient's length of stay was decreased by 1–3 days.

The use of topical antibiotics on surgical wounds to reduce infection rates has been questioned.[35] Antibiotic ointments are likely to irritate the skin, slow healing, and could increase risk of developing contact dermatitis and antibiotic resistance.[35] It has also been suggested that topical antibiotics should only be used when a person shows signs of infection and not as a preventative.[35] A systematic review published by Cochrane (organisation) in 2016, though, concluded that topical antibiotics applied over certain types of surgical wounds reduce the risk of surgical site infections, when compared to no treatment or use of antiseptics.[36] The review also did not find conclusive evidence to suggest that topical antibiotics increased the risk of local skin reactions or antibiotic resistance.[citation needed]

Through a retrospective analysis of national administrative data, the association between mortality and day of elective surgical procedure suggests a higher risk in procedures carried out later in the working week and on weekends. The odds of death were 44% and 82% higher respectively when comparing procedures on a Friday to a weekend procedure. This "weekday effect" has been postulated to be from several factors including poorer availability of services on a weekend, and also, decrease number and level of experience over a weekend.[37]

Postoperative pain affects an estimated 80% of people who underwent surgery.[38] While pain is expected after surgery, there is growing evidence that pain may be inadequately treated in many people in the acute period immediately after surgery. It has been reported that incidence of inadequately controlled pain after surgery ranged from 25.1% to 78.4% across all surgical disciplines.[39] There is insufficient evidence to determine if giving opioid pain medication pre-emptively (before surgery) reduces postoperative pain the amount of medication needed after surgery.[38]

Postoperative recovery has been defined as an energy‐requiring process to decrease physical symptoms, reach a level of emotional well‐being, regain functions, and re‐establish activities.[40] Most people are discharged from the hospital or surgical center before they are fully recovered. The recovery process may include complications such as postoperative cognitive dysfunction and postoperative depression.[41][42]

Epidemiology

[edit]

United States

[edit]

In 2011, of the 38.6 million hospital stays in U.S. hospitals, 29% included at least one operating room procedure. These stays accounted for 48% of the total $387 billion in hospital costs.[43]

The overall number of procedures remained stable from 2001 to 2011. In 2011, over 15 million operating room procedures were performed in U.S. hospitals.[44]

Data from 2003 to 2011 showed that U.S. hospital costs were highest for the surgical service line; the surgical service line costs were $17,600 in 2003 and projected to be $22,500 in 2013.[45] For hospital stays in 2012 in the United States, private insurance had the highest percentage of surgical expenditure.[46] in 2012, mean hospital costs in the United States were highest for surgical stays.[46]

Special populations

[edit]

Elderly people

[edit]

Older adults have widely varying physical health. Frail elderly people are at significant risk of post-surgical complications and the need for extended care. Assessment of older people before elective surgery can accurately predict the person's recovery trajectories.[47] One frailty scale uses five items: unintentional weight loss, muscle weakness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and slowed walking speed. A healthy person scores 0; a very frail person scores 5. Compared to non-frail elderly people, people with intermediate frailty scores (2 or 3) are twice as likely to have post-surgical complications, spend 50% more time in the hospital, and are three times as likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility instead of to their own homes.[47] People who are frail and elderly (score of 4 or 5) have even worse outcomes, with the risk of being discharged to a nursing home rising to twenty times the rate for non-frail elderly people.[citation needed]

Children

[edit]

Surgery on children requires considerations that are not common in adult surgery. Children and adolescents are still developing physically and mentally making it difficult for them to make informed decisions and give consent for surgical treatments. Bariatric surgery in youth is among the controversial topics related to surgery in children.[citation needed]

See also: Pediatric surgery and Pediatric plastic surgery

Vulnerable populations

[edit]

Doctors perform surgery with the consent of the person undergoing surgery. Some people are able to give better informed consent than others. Populations such as incarcerated persons, people living with dementia, the mentally incompetent, persons subject to coercion, and other people who are not able to make decisions with the same authority as others, have special needs when making decisions about their personal healthcare, including surgery.

Global surgery

[edit]

Global surgery has been defined as 'the multidisciplinary enterprise of providing improved and equitable surgical care to the world's population, with its core belief as the issues of need, access and quality".[48] Halfdan T. Mahler, the 3rd Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), first brought attention to the disparities in surgery and surgical care in 1980 when he stated in his address to the World Congress of the International College of Surgeons, "'the vast majority of the world's population has no access whatsoever to skilled surgical care and little is being done to find a solution.As such, surgical care globally has been described as the 'neglected stepchild of global health,' a term coined by Paul Farmer to highlight the urgent need for further work in this area.[49] Furthermore, Jim Young Kim, the former President of the World Bank, proclaimed in 2014 that "surgery is an indivisible, indispensable part of health care and of progress towards universal health coverage."[50]

In 2015, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) published the landmark report titled "Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development", describing the large, pre-existing burden of surgical diseases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and future directions for increasing universal access to safe surgery by the year 2030.[51] The Commission highlighted that about 5 billion people lack access to safe and affordable surgical and anesthesia care and 143 million additional procedures were needed every year to prevent further morbidity and mortality from treatable surgical conditions as well as a $12.3 trillion loss in economic productivity by the year 2030.[51] This was especially true in the poorest countries, which account for over one-third of the population but only 3.5% of all surgeries that occur worldwide.[52] It emphasized the need to significantly improve the capacity for Bellwether procedures – laparotomy, caesarean section, open fracture care – which are considered a minimum level of care that first-level hospitals should be able to provide in order to capture the most basic emergency surgical care.[51][53] In terms of the financial impact on the patients, the lack of adequate surgical and anesthesia care has resulted in 33 million individuals every year facing catastrophic health expenditure – the out-of-pocket healthcare cost exceeding 40% of a given household's income.[51][54]

In alignment with the LCoGS call for action, the World Health Assembly adopted the resolution WHA68.15 in 2015 that stated, "Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anesthesia as a component of universal health coverage."[55] This not only mandated the WHO to prioritize strengthening the surgical and anesthesia care globally, but also led to governments of the member states recognizing the urgent need for increasing capacity in surgery and anesthesia. Additionally, the third edition of Disease Control Priorities (DCP3), published in 2015 by the World Bank, declared surgery as essential and featured an entire volume dedicated to building surgical capacity.[56]

Data from WHO and the World Bank indicate that scaling up infrastructure to enable access to surgical care in regions where it is currently limited or is non-existent is a low-cost measure relative to the significant morbidity and mortality caused by lack of surgical treatment.[57] In fact, a systematic review found that the cost-effectiveness ratio – dollars spent per DALYs averted – for surgical interventions is on par or exceeds those of major public health interventions such as oral rehydration therapy, breastfeeding promotion, and even HIV/AIDS antiretroviral therapy.[58] This finding challenged the common misconception that surgical care is financially prohibitive endeavor not worth pursuing in LMICs.

A key policy framework that arose from this renewed global commitment towards surgical care worldwide is the National Surgical Obstetric and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP).[59] NSOAP focuses on policy-to-action capacity building for surgical care with tangible steps as follows: (1) analysis of baseline indicators, (2) partnership with local champions, (3) broad stakeholder engagement, (4) consensus building and synthesis of ideas, (5) language refinement, (6) costing, (7) dissemination, and (8) implementation. This approach has been widely adopted and has served as guiding principles between international collaborators and local institutions and governments. Successful implementations have allowed for sustainability in terms of longterm monitoring, quality improvement, and continued political and financial support.[59]

Human rights

[edit]

Access to surgical care is increasingly recognized as an integral aspect of healthcare and therefore is evolving into a normative derivation of human right to health.[60] The ICESCR Article 12.1 and 12.2 define the human right to health as "the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health"[61] In the August 2000, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) interpreted this to mean "right to the enjoyment of a variety of facilities, goods, services, and conditions necessary for the realization of the highest attainable health".[62] Surgical care can be thereby viewed as a positive right – an entitlement to protective healthcare.[62]

Woven through the International Human and Health Rights literature is the right to be free from surgical disease. The 1966 ICESCR Article 12.2a described the need for "provision for the reduction of the stillbirth-rate and of infant mortality and for the healthy development of the child"[63] which was subsequently interpreted to mean "requiring measures to improve... emergency obstetric services".[62] Article 12.2d of the ICESCR stipulates the need for "the creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness",[64] and is interpreted in the 2000 comment to include timely access to "basic preventative, curative services... for appropriate treatment of injury and disability.".[65] Obstetric care shares close ties with reproductive rights, which includes access to reproductive health.[65]

Surgeons and public health advocates, such as Kelly McQueen, have described surgery as "Integral to the right to health".[66] This is reflected in the establishment of the WHO Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care in 2005,[67] the 2013 formation of the Lancet Commission for Global Surgery,[68] the 2015 World Bank Publication of Volume 1 of its Disease Control Priorities Project "Essential Surgery",[12] and the 2015 World Health Assembly 68.15 passing of the Resolution for Strengthening Emergency and Essential Surgical Care and Anesthesia as a Component of Universal Health Coverage.[55] The Lancet Commission for Global Surgery outlined the need for access to "available, affordable, timely and safe" surgical and anesthesia care;[68] dimensions paralleled in ICESCR General Comment No. 14, which similarly outlines need for available, accessible, affordable and timely healthcare.[62]

History

[edit]
Main articles: History of surgery, Prehistoric medicine, and History of general anesthesia
Plates VI and VII of the Edwin Smith Papyrus, an Egyptian surgical treatise

Trepanation

[edit]

Surgical treatments date back to the prehistoric era. The oldest for which there is evidence is trepanation,[69] in which a hole is drilled or scraped into the skull, thus exposing the dura mater in order to treat health problems related to intracranial pressure.

Ancient Egypt

[edit]

Prehistoric surgical techniques are seen in Ancient Egypt, where a mandible dated to approximately 2650 BC shows two perforations just below the root of the first molar, indicating the draining of an abscessed tooth. Surgical texts from ancient Egypt date back about 3500 years ago. Surgical operations were performed by priests, specialized in medical treatments similar to today,[70] and used sutures to close wounds.[71] Infections were treated with honey.[72]

India

[edit]

9,000-year-old skeletal remains of a prehistoric individual from the Indus River valley show evidence of teeth having been drilled.[73] Sushruta Samhita is one of the oldest known surgical texts and its period is usually placed in the first millennium BCE.[74] It describes in detail the examination, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of numerous ailments, as well as procedures for various forms of cosmetic surgery, plastic surgery and rhinoplasty.[75]

Sri Lanka

[edit]

In 1982 archaeologists were able to find significant evidence when the ancient land, called 'Alahana Pirivena' situated in Polonnaruwa, with ruins, was excavated. In that place ruins of an ancient hospital emerged. The hospital building was 147.5 feet in width and 109.2 feet in length. The instruments which were used for complex surgeries were there among the things discovered from the place, including forceps, scissors, probes, lancets, and scalpels. The instruments discovered may be dated to 11th century AD.[76][77][78][79]

Ancient and Medieval Greece

[edit]
Bust of Hippocrates, who advocated for surgery to be performed by specialists.

In ancient Greece, temples dedicated to the healer-god Asclepius, known as Asclepieia (Greek: Ασκληπιεία, sing. Asclepieion Ασκληπιείον), functioned as centers of medical advice, prognosis, and healing.[80] In the Asclepieion of Epidaurus, some of the surgical cures listed, such as the opening of an abdominal abscess or the removal of traumatic foreign material, are realistic enough to have taken place.[30] The Greek Galen was one of the greatest surgeons of the ancient world and performed many audacious operations – including brain and eye surgery – that were not tried again for almost two millennia. Hippocrates stated in the oath (c. 400 BCE) "I will not use the knife, even upon those suffering from stones, but I will leave this to those who are trained in this craft."[81]

Researchers from the Adelphi University discovered in the Paliokastro on Thasos ten skeletal remains, four women and six men, who were buried between the fourth and seventh centuries A.D. Their bones illuminated their physical activities, traumas, and even a complex form of brain surgery. According to the researchers: "The very serious trauma cases sustained by both males and females had been treated surgically or orthopedically by a very experienced physician/surgeon with great training in trauma care. We believe it to have been a military physician". The researchers were impressed by the complexity of the brain surgical operation.[82]

In 1991 at the Polystylon fort in Greece, researchers discovered the head of a Byzantine warrior of the 14th century. Analysis of the lower jaw revealed that a surgery has been performed, when the warrior was alive, to the jaw which had been badly fractured and it tied back together until it healed.[83]

Islamic world

[edit]

During the Islamic Golden Age, largely based upon Paul of Aegina's Pragmateia, the writings of Albucasis (Abu al-Qasim Khalaf ibn al-Abbas Al-Zahrawi), an Andalusian-Arab physician and scientist who practiced in the Zahra suburb of Córdoba, were influential.[84][85] Al-Zahrawi specialized in curing disease by cauterization. He invented several surgical instruments for purposes such as inspection of the interior of the urethra and for removing foreign bodies from the throat, the ear, and other body organs. He was also the first to illustrate the various cannulae and to treat warts with an iron tube and caustic metal[clarification needed] as a boring instrument. He describes what is thought to be the first attempt at reduction mammaplasty for the management of gynaecomastia[86] and the first mastectomy to treat breast cancer.[87] He is credited with the performance of the first thyroidectomy.[88] Al-Zahrawi pioneered techniques of neurosurgery and neurological diagnosis, treating head injuries, skull fractures, spinal injuries, hydrocephalus, subdural effusions and headache. The first clinical description of an operative procedure for hydrocephalus was given by Al-Zahrawi, who clearly describes the evacuation of superficial intracranial fluid in hydrocephalic children.[89]

Early modern Europe

[edit]
Illuminated miniature of 12th-century eye surgery in Italy
Ambroise Paré (c. 1510–1590), father of modern military surgery.

In Europe, the demand grew for surgeons to formally study for many years before practicing; universities such as Montpellier, Padua and Bologna were particularly renowned. In the 12th century, Rogerius Salernitanus composed his Chirurgia, laying the foundation for modern Western surgical manuals. Barber-surgeons generally had a bad reputation that was not to improve until the development of academic surgery as a specialty of medicine, rather than an accessory field.[90] Basic surgical principles for asepsis etc., are known as Halsteads principles.

There were some important advances to the art of surgery during this period. The professor of anatomy at the University of Padua, Andreas Vesalius, was a pivotal figure in the Renaissance transition from classical medicine and anatomy based on the works of Galen, to an empirical approach of 'hands-on' dissection. In his anatomic treaties De humani corporis fabrica, he exposed the many anatomical errors in Galen and advocated that all surgeons should train by engaging in practical dissections themselves.[citation needed]

The second figure of importance in this era was Ambroise Paré (sometimes spelled "Ambrose"[91]), a French army surgeon from the 1530s until his death in 1590. The practice for cauterizing gunshot wounds on the battlefield had been to use boiling oil; an extremely dangerous and painful procedure. Paré began to employ a less irritating emollient, made of egg yolk, rose oil and turpentine. He also described more efficient techniques for the effective ligation of the blood vessels during an amputation.[92]

Modern surgery

[edit]

The discipline of surgery was put on a sound, scientific footing during the Age of Enlightenment in Europe. An important figure in this regard was the Scottish surgical scientist, John Hunter, generally regarded as the father of modern scientific surgery.[93] He brought an empirical and experimental approach to the science and was renowned around Europe for the quality of his research and his written works. Hunter reconstructed surgical knowledge from scratch; refusing to rely on the testimonies of others, he conducted his own surgical experiments to determine the truth of the matter. To aid comparative analysis, he built up a collection of over 13,000 specimens of separate organ systems, from the simplest plants and animals to humans.[citation needed]

He greatly advanced knowledge of venereal disease and introduced many new techniques of surgery, including new methods for repairing damage to the Achilles tendon and a more effective method for applying ligature of the arteries in case of an aneurysm.[94] He was also one of the first to understand the importance of pathology, the danger of the spread of infection and how the problem of inflammation of the wound, bone lesions and even tuberculosis often undid any benefit that was gained from the intervention. He consequently adopted the position that all surgical procedures should be used only as a last resort.[95]

Other important 18th- and early 19th-century surgeons included Percival Pott (1713–1788) who described tuberculosis on the spine and first demonstrated that a cancer may be caused by an environmental carcinogen (he noticed a connection between chimney sweep's exposure to soot and their high incidence of scrotal cancer). Astley Paston Cooper (1768–1841) first performed a successful ligation of the abdominal aorta, and James Syme (1799–1870) pioneered the Symes Amputation for the ankle joint and successfully carried out the first hip disarticulation.

Modern pain control through anesthesia was discovered in the mid-19th century. Before the advent of anesthesia, surgery was a traumatically painful procedure and surgeons were encouraged to be as swift as possible to minimize patient suffering. This also meant that operations were largely restricted to amputations and external growth removals. Beginning in the 1840s, surgery began to change dramatically in character with the discovery of effective and practical anaesthetic chemicals such as ether, first used by the American surgeon Crawford Long, and chloroform, discovered by Scottish obstetrician James Young Simpson and later pioneered by John Snow, physician to Queen Victoria.[96] In addition to relieving patient suffering, anaesthesia allowed more intricate operations in the internal regions of the human body. In addition, the discovery of muscle relaxants such as curare allowed for safer applications.[citation needed]

Infection and antisepsis

[edit]

The introduction of anesthetics encouraged more surgery, which inadvertently caused more dangerous patient post-operative infections. The concept of infection was unknown until relatively modern times. The first progress in combating infection was made in 1847 by the Hungarian doctor Ignaz Semmelweis who noticed that medical students fresh from the dissecting room were causing excess maternal death compared to midwives. Semmelweis, despite ridicule and opposition, introduced compulsory handwashing for everyone entering the maternal wards and was rewarded with a plunge in maternal and fetal deaths; however, the Royal Society dismissed his advice.[citation needed]

Joseph Lister, pioneer of antiseptic surgery

Until the pioneering work of British surgeon Joseph Lister in the 1860s, most medical men believed that chemical damage from exposures to bad air (see "miasma") was responsible for infections in wounds, and facilities for washing hands or a patient's wounds were not available.[97] Lister became aware of the work of French chemist Louis Pasteur, who showed that rotting and fermentation could occur under anaerobic conditions if micro-organisms were present. Pasteur suggested three methods to eliminate the micro-organisms responsible for gangrene: filtration, exposure to heat, or exposure to chemical solutions. Lister confirmed Pasteur's conclusions with his own experiments and decided to use his findings to develop antiseptic techniques for wounds. As the first two methods suggested by Pasteur were inappropriate for the treatment of human tissue, Lister experimented with the third, spraying carbolic acid on his instruments. He found that this remarkably reduced the incidence of gangrene and he published his results in The Lancet.[98] Later, on 9 August 1867, he read a paper before the British Medical Association in Dublin, on the Antiseptic Principle of the Practice of Surgery, which was reprinted in the British Medical Journal.[99][100][101] His work was groundbreaking and laid the foundations for a rapid advance in infection control that saw modern antiseptic operating theatres widely used within 50 years.[citation needed]

Lister continued to develop improved methods of antisepsis and asepsis when he realised that infection could be better avoided by preventing bacteria from getting into wounds in the first place. This led to the rise of sterile surgery. Lister introduced the Steam Steriliser to sterilize equipment, instituted rigorous hand washing and later implemented the wearing of rubber gloves. These three crucial advances – the adoption of a scientific methodology toward surgical operations, the use of anaesthetic and the introduction of sterilised equipment – laid the groundwork for the modern invasive surgical techniques of today.

The use of X-rays as an important medical diagnostic tool began with their discovery in 1895 by German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen. He noticed that these rays could penetrate the skin, allowing the skeletal structure to be captured on a specially treated photographic plate.

Surgical specialties

[edit]

Learned societies

[edit]

See also

[edit]
[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Surgery

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Surgery is a that employs operative manual and instrumental techniques on patients to investigate or treat pathological conditions, including diseases, injuries, and deformities, with the goals of restoring function, alleviating suffering, or prolonging life. Ancient evidence of surgical practices appears in the , an Egyptian text dating to approximately 1600 BCE that documents procedures for managing wounds, fractures, and tumors using empirical observations rather than supernatural explanations. Major advancements transformed surgery from rapid, painful interventions limited by patient tolerance into a precise , beginning with the first public demonstration of ether anesthesia in 1846, which enabled prolonged operations, followed by Joseph Lister's introduction of methods in the 1860s that reduced mortality from postoperative through carbolic acid sprays and sterile protocols. Twentieth-century achievements include the first successful kidney transplant between identical twins in 1954, establishing solid as a viable for end-stage organ , and the widespread adoption of laparoscopic techniques in the , which minimized incision sizes, reduced recovery times, and lowered complication risks compared to open procedures. Contemporary surgery spans over a dozen recognized subspecialties, such as cardiothoracic and , incorporating robotic systems for enhanced precision and ongoing debates over intervention efficacy, including concerns about overtreatment and persistent rates of surgical-site infections affecting up to 5% of cases despite protocols.

Definitions and Classifications

Definition and Scope

Surgery constitutes a branch of focused on the and treatment of injuries, diseases, deformities, and other disorders through operative manual and instrumental techniques that physically alter bodily structures or functions. These procedures typically involve incision, excision, abrasion, or manipulation of tissues to repair damage, remove pathological material, or investigate underlying conditions. As defined by the , surgery entails structurally altering the via tissue incision or destruction, distinguishing it as an integral component of medical practice rather than a mere technical intervention. The scope of surgery encompasses both therapeutic and diagnostic applications, ranging from emergency interventions for trauma—such as controlling hemorrhage or stabilizing fractures—to elective procedures aimed at improving , like or reconstructive repairs. It integrates foundational principles of , , , and to address congenital anomalies, acquired diseases, and functional impairments, often requiring multidisciplinary collaboration with , , and . Modern advancements have expanded this scope to include minimally invasive methods, such as and , which reduce tissue trauma compared to traditional open techniques, while maintaining the core objective of causal restoration through direct physical correction. Surgical practice demands rigorous preoperative assessment to mitigate risks like or complications, with outcomes empirically tied to procedural precision and patient-specific factors such as age and comorbidities. While surgery excels in scenarios where non-operative treatments fail—evidenced by its role in over 300 million annual global procedures resolving acute threats like or cancer resection—it is not universally applicable, yielding inferior results for conditions better managed pharmacologically or conservatively due to inherent risks of operative morbidity.

Types of Surgery

Surgical procedures are classified according to several criteria, including urgency, purpose, technique or degree of invasiveness, extent, and the anatomical region or involved. These classifications aid in planning, , and , reflecting the diverse applications of surgery in treating , , or congenital anomalies. By urgency, surgeries divide into elective, urgent, and emergency categories. Elective procedures are scheduled in advance for non-life-threatening conditions, allowing time for preoperative optimization, such as removal or joint replacement. Urgent surgeries address conditions requiring intervention within hours to days to prevent deterioration, like certain bowel obstructions. Emergency surgeries demand immediate action, often within minutes, to preserve life or limb, exemplified by trauma or ruptured repair. By purpose, surgeries encompass diagnostic (e.g., to confirm ), curative (aimed at removing or destroying diseased tissue, such as tumor resection), palliative (to alleviate symptoms without curing, like in advanced cancer), restorative or reconstructive (to repair function or appearance post-trauma or congenital defect), and cosmetic (elective enhancement of appearance). ![Cardiac surgery operating room][float-right] By technique and invasiveness, open surgery remains foundational, involving a large incision for direct access, as in traditional , typically closed with stitches or staples. Minimally invasive approaches, including (using small incisions and a camera for abdominal procedures), (via natural orifices, e.g., with polypectomy), (joint-specific), and robotic-assisted surgery (enhancing precision with articulated instruments), reduce recovery time and complications compared to open methods, though they require specialized equipment and training. Microsurgery employs magnified visualization for delicate structures like vessels or nerves. By extent, procedures classify as minor (outpatient, low risk, e.g., hernia repair under local anesthesia) or major (inpatient, higher complexity and physiological stress, e.g., organ transplantation requiring general anesthesia and extended monitoring). By specialty or body system, surgery subdivides into recognized fields, with the American College of Surgeons identifying 14 primary ones: cardiothoracic (heart and chest, e.g., coronary artery bypass), colon and rectal (digestive tract lower end), general (abdomen, skin, soft tissue), gynecology and obstetrics (female reproductive), neurological (brain and spine), oral and maxillofacial (face and jaw), orthopedic (musculoskeletal), otolaryngology (ear, nose, throat), pediatric, plastic (reconstructive or aesthetic), thoracic (non-cardiac chest), urology (urinary and male reproductive), and vascular (blood vessels). Subspecialties further refine these, such as hand surgery or surgical oncology.

Terminology and Nomenclature

The term surgery derives from the Ancient Greek cheirourgia (χειρουργία), composed of cheir (χείρ, "hand") and ergon (ἔργον, "work"), denoting manual operative treatment. This etymology reflects the discipline's emphasis on hands-on intervention, as articulated by Roman physician Celsus in the 1st century CE, who described chirurgia as the branch of medicine involving manual work to address bodily defects or injuries. The word entered Middle English around 1300 via Old French surgerie and Late Latin chirurgia, evolving to encompass both the act and the specialty. Surgical nomenclature predominantly employs Greco-Latin roots, prefixes, and suffixes to systematically describe procedures, enabling precise communication across languages and disciplines. Common suffixes include -ectomy (excision or removal, e.g., appendectomy for appendix removal), -otomy or -stomy (incision or creation of an opening, e.g., tracheostomy), -plasty (reconstructive repair, e.g., rhinoplasty), -rrhaphy (suturing, e.g., herniorrhaphy), and -lysis (loosening or breakdown, e.g., tenolysis for tendon release). Prefixes often specify anatomical location or approach, such as abdomino- for abdominal procedures or laparo- for minimally invasive abdominal access (e.g., laparotomy). This root-based system facilitates derivation of terms like cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal, from chole- "bile," cyst- "bladder," and -ectomy) or hysterectomy (uterus removal), promoting universality despite regional variations in pronunciation or minor adaptations. Procedures are further classified by urgency and invasiveness in clinical nomenclature. denotes planned, non-urgent interventions (e.g., joint replacement), urgent surgery addresses conditions requiring prompt action within hours to days (e.g., acute repair), and emergency surgery demands immediate operation to avert death or severe harm (e.g., ruptured repair). Invasiveness distinguishes open surgery (large incisions exposing organs) from minimally invasive techniques like (small ports with endoscopic visualization) or (internal scoping without incision). Major surgery typically involves general , significant physiological trespass (e.g., organ resection), and higher risk, contrasting with minor surgery under for superficial issues (e.g., excision), though boundaries remain context-dependent without universal thresholds. Standardized coding systems enhance nomenclature for epidemiological and billing purposes. The NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), developed by in 1996, codes operations by anatomical site, procedure type, and specificity (e.g., KJA00 for simple ). Internationally, the International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) under WHO frameworks aims to harmonize terms, integrating with for clinical interoperability, though adoption varies and free-text descriptions persist in records. These systems prioritize anatomical precision and procedural intent over eponyms (e.g., Billroth procedure for variants), reducing ambiguity in global data exchange.

Surgical Procedures and Techniques

Preoperative Evaluation and Preparation

Preoperative evaluation begins with a comprehensive and to identify comorbidities, previous surgical experiences, and factors influencing risk, such as , respiratory conditions, or medication use. This assessment determines the need for targeted diagnostic tests, avoiding routine screening like universal or chest , which evidence shows do not improve outcomes in low-risk patients but may in those with specific indications, such as age over 50 or known cardiac history. Laboratory investigations, including , electrolytes, and coagulation studies, are guided by clinical suspicion rather than protocol, as indiscriminate testing increases costs without reducing perioperative morbidity. Risk stratification employs standardized tools to quantify perioperative complications. The (ASA) Physical Status classification, introduced in 1941 and refined over decades, assigns categories from PS I (a normal healthy ) to PS VI (a declared brain-dead whose organs are being harvested), facilitating communication of pre-anesthesia comorbidities and correlating with mortality rates—e.g., PS III patients (severe ) face approximately 1-3% of in elective procedures. Cardiac-specific indices, such as the , predict major adverse cardiac events by scoring factors like ischemic heart disease, , insulin-dependent diabetes, and high-risk surgery type, with scores of 0 indicating <1% and ≥3 indicating >9% . Broader calculators, like the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) tool, integrate age, functional status, and procedure-specific data to estimate outcomes such as or renal , though their predictive accuracy varies by surgical context and requires validation against empirical data. Optimization of identified risks aims to mitigate complications through interventions like (reducing pulmonary issues by up to 50% if quit >8 weeks preoperatively), correction via iron supplementation or transfusion thresholds tailored to levels below 10 g/dL in select cases, and glycemic control targeting HbA1c <8% in diabetics. However, rigorous evidence questions the net benefit of aggressive preoperative medical consultations; a 2023 analysis of over 590,000 noncardiac surgeries found such consultations associated with no reduction in 30-day mortality or readmissions and, in some subgroups, increased harm due to delays or unnecessary interventions. Causal mechanisms favor procedure-specific, evidence-based adjustments over blanket optimization, as systemic biases in academic guidelines may overemphasize consultation without accounting for opportunity costs like surgical postponement. Informed consent is obtained after full disclosure of the procedure's nature, anticipated benefits, material risks (e.g., infection rates of 1-5% for clean procedures), alternatives including nonoperative management, and potential complications, ensuring the competent patient voluntarily agrees without coercion. Legal requirements, as per U.S. standards, mandate documentation of this process, with capacity assessed via understanding and reasoning ability rather than mere signature. Final preparation includes nil per os status for solids after midnight and clear liquids up to 2 hours pre-induction to minimize aspiration risk, adjustment of chronic medications (e.g., continuing beta-blockers but holding anticoagulants per guidelines), and site-specific prophylaxis like antibiotics administered within 60 minutes of incision for procedures with infection risks exceeding 2%. These steps, grounded in randomized trials, reduce nausea and bacterial contamination without evidence of harm from modest liberalization of fasting protocols in adults.

Intraoperative Procedures

The intraoperative phase begins when the patient enters the operating room and ends upon transfer to the postanesthesia care unit, encompassing anesthesia administration, surgical intervention, and immediate recovery from anesthesia. This phase involves a multidisciplinary team including the surgeon, anesthesiologist, surgical assistants, and nurses, who maintain a sterile environment to minimize infection risk through practices such as skin decontamination with antiseptics and use of physical barriers. Patient positioning is optimized for surgical access while preventing complications like nerve injury or pressure ulcers, followed by final skin preparation and draping. Anesthesia induction occurs upon positioning, typically involving general, regional, or local methods tailored to the procedure, with maintenance ensuring unconsciousness or analgesia throughout. Continuous monitoring includes electrocardiography, pulse oximetry for oxygen saturation, noninvasive blood pressure every five minutes, end-tidal capnography, and temperature assessment, as mandated by standards to detect physiological derangements promptly. Advanced neuromonitoring, such as somatosensory evoked potentials or electromyography, may be employed in procedures risking neural damage to guide real-time adjustments. The core surgical steps commence with incision to access the operative site, followed by dissection, tissue manipulation, and the specific intervention such as resection, repair, or reconstruction. Hemostasis is achieved through mechanical methods like ligation or clipping, thermal energy devices such as electrocautery, or topical agents including gelatin sponges and thrombin-based products when conventional techniques prove insufficient. Closure involves layered suturing or stapling of tissues, ensuring approximation without undue tension to promote healing, often under imaging guidance in complex cases. Intraoperative complications, including hemorrhage or adverse anesthetic events, are managed with protocols emphasizing rapid intervention, such as fluid resuscitation or pharmacological reversal, to stabilize the patient before closure. Minimally invasive techniques, like laparoscopy, integrate specialized instruments and insufflation to reduce tissue trauma, though open approaches remain standard for certain anatomies. Efficiency is enhanced by process mapping to streamline steps, reducing operative time without compromising safety.

Postoperative Management

Postoperative management encompasses the continuum of care from the immediate recovery phase following surgical closure through hospital discharge and outpatient surveillance, with the primary objectives of stabilizing the patient, mitigating complications, and facilitating recovery. This phase typically begins in a post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) where patients are monitored for vital signs, oxygenation, and emergence from anesthesia, with criteria for transfer to a ward including stable hemodynamics, adequate pain control, and return of protective airway reflexes. Evidence-based protocols, such as Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), integrate multimodal interventions to attenuate surgical stress response, evidenced by reduced complication rates (from 20-30% in traditional care to 10-15% with ERAS implementation) and shortened hospital lengths of stay by 1-3 days across major procedures like colorectal resections. Pain management relies on multimodal analgesia to minimize opioid use, incorporating regional blocks, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen, which has demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing postoperative opioid consumption by up to 50% compared to opioid monotherapy while lowering nausea and sedation risks. Respiratory complications, such as atelectasis or pneumonia, affect 5-10% of patients post-major abdominal surgery; prevention involves incentive spirometry, early coughing exercises, and mobilization within 24 hours to enhance lung expansion and reduce ventilator-associated risks. Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin or pneumatic compression devices is standard for moderate- to high-risk patients, halving deep vein thrombosis incidence (from 2-3% to under 1%) without significantly increasing bleeding events in randomized trials. Wound care protocols emphasize aseptic techniques, with dressings changed within 48 hours and monitored for signs of surgical site infection (SSI), which occurs in 2-5% of clean procedures and up to 20% in contaminated cases; prophylactic antibiotics, administered within 60 minutes prior to incision, with re-dosing for prolonged procedures or significant blood loss, and discontinued within 24 hours for most surgeries, reduce SSI rates by 50% per meta-analyses. Fluid and nutritional management shifts from restrictive perioperative strategies to goal-directed therapy, avoiding overload that contributes to pulmonary edema in 10-15% of cases, while early oral intake (within 24 hours) in ERAS pathways accelerates gastrointestinal recovery without increasing anastomotic leak risks. Common complications, including urinary retention (5-10% post-spinal anesthesia) and delirium (up to 50% in elderly patients), necessitate vigilant surveillance and targeted interventions like intermittent catheterization or non-pharmacologic orientation protocols. Discharge planning incorporates standardized criteria, such as tolerance of oral intake, independent ambulation, and pain control on oral agents, with follow-up to detect delayed issues like wound dehiscence (1-3% incidence). Overall, postoperative complication rates range from 7-15% in major surgeries, with prompt recognition and protocol-driven management improving survival; for instance, early intervention in sepsis halves mortality from 40% to 20%. Adoption of ERAS in emergency general surgery further extends benefits, reducing readmissions by 20-30% through standardized care bundles.

Surgical Environments and Teams

Surgical procedures are conducted in specialized environments optimized for sterility, precise instrumentation, and patient safety, primarily hospital operating rooms (ORs) and ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Hospital ORs accommodate complex, high-acuity interventions requiring intensive monitoring and support services, featuring modular designs with integrated imaging, advanced lighting, and ventilation systems providing 12 to 30 air changes per hour to maintain laminar airflow and reduce airborne contaminants. ASCs, numbering over 5,000 in the U.S. as of 2024, focus on same-day elective procedures like cataracts or arthroscopies, offering lower costs—often 40-60% less than hospitals—and potentially reduced infection risks due to specialized focus and lower patient acuity. These facilities emphasize efficient throughput, with ASCs handling millions of procedures annually while adhering to Medicare standards for physician ownership and accreditation. Sterility in surgical environments is maintained through rigorous standards, including positive-pressure ventilation, HEPA filtration, and one-way traffic flows from contaminated to clean zones to prevent cross-contamination. Operating rooms incorporate sterile cores for instrument processing, with protocols mandating surgical gowns, gloves, drapes, and aseptic techniques once the field is established; violations, such as unsterile instrument handling, elevate surgical site infection risks, which affect 2-5% of procedures globally. Environmental controls also mitigate particulates via directional airflow, sweeping contaminants away from the sterile field, as validated by ASHRAE guidelines for OR ventilation. The surgical team comprises multidisciplinary professionals with defined roles to ensure coordinated care. The surgeon directs the procedure, performing incisions, resections, and reconstructions, often assisted by residents or physician assistants for complex cases. An anesthesiologist or certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) administers anesthesia, monitors vital signs, and manages airway and hemodynamic stability throughout the operation. Circulating nurses oversee non-sterile tasks, including documentation, supply procurement, and patient advocacy, while scrub technicians or nurses maintain the sterile field, passing instruments and counting sponges to prevent retained items. Team coordination is enhanced by protocols like the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, implemented since 2008, which includes sign-in (patient identity, consent, allergies), time-out (site marking, procedure confirmation), and sign-out (instrument counts, recovery plans) phases. Multicenter trials demonstrate its use reduces major complications by 36% and mortality by 47% in diverse settings, underscoring the value of standardized communication in averting errors like wrong-site surgery. In ASCs, teams may be leaner, excluding residents, but maintain equivalent core roles to uphold safety amid rising procedure volumes.

Epidemiology and Clinical Outcomes

Global Incidence and Prevalence

Approximately 313 million major surgical procedures are performed worldwide each year, encompassing a range from essential interventions like caesarean sections and trauma repairs to elective operations.60160-X/fulltext) This figure, derived from modeling national health data and validated against hospital records, highlights stark disparities: only 6% of these procedures occur in the lowest-income countries, which house over one-third of the global population.60160-X/fulltext) High-income countries perform upwards of 10,000 procedures per 100,000 population annually, while low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) average below 1,000, far short of the Lancet Commission's benchmark of 5,000 procedures per 100,000 to meet population needs.60160-X/fulltext) The unmet need for surgery has grown to at least 160 million procedures annually as of 2025, driven by population growth, aging demographics, and persistent infrastructure gaps in LMICs, where conditions like trauma, obstetric complications, and cancer require surgical intervention but lack capacity.00985-7/fulltext) Globally, over 5 billion people—roughly 63% of the population—lack access to safe, timely surgical care, with surgical volume in the poorest quintile of countries accounting for just 3.5% of total procedures. Data collection has improved, with 123 countries (56.9% of nations) reporting surgical volumes by 2023, up from prior years, though underreporting in fragile states likely underestimates true deficits. Prevalence of surgical need correlates with disease burden, with non-communicable diseases (e.g., cardiovascular conditions requiring bypasses) dominating in wealthier regions and infectious or injury-related cases prevalent in LMICs; for instance, cataract surgeries constitute a high volume in low-resource settings due to treatable blindness.60160-X/fulltext) These patterns reflect causal factors like workforce shortages (e.g., fewer than 20 surgeons per 100,000 in many LMICs) and geographic barriers, rather than demand differences alone. Ongoing monitoring via World Bank and WHO-aligned indicators underscores that scaling to equitable rates would require trillions in investment, prioritizing essential over cosmetic procedures, which reached 35 million globally in 2023 but represent a minor fraction of total need.00985-7/fulltext)

Mortality, Morbidity, and Complication Rates

Perioperative mortality rates for major surgery worldwide range from 0.5% to 5%, with an estimated 4.2 million deaths occurring within 30 days of surgery annually, many deemed preventable through improved safety measures. In high-resource settings, such as industrialized countries, crude in-hospital mortality after major procedures averages around 1-2%, though implementation of standardized checklists has reduced rates from 1.5% to 0.8% in diverse hospital cohorts. Emergency surgeries exhibit substantially higher mortality, with pooled estimates of 3-4.5% compared to 0.7% for elective procedures, reflecting delays in care and patient acuity. Postoperative morbidity, encompassing non-fatal adverse events, affects up to 25% of inpatients undergoing major operations globally, with complication incidence often underestimated without comprehensive post-discharge tracking. Using the Clavien-Dindo classification, minor complications (grades I-II) comprise 20-25% of cases, while major ones (grades III-V) occur in 5-15%, including organ injuries linked to 9-fold increased mortality odds and extended hospital stays by over 11 days. In low- and middle-income countries, morbidity rates for essential procedures exceed 20%, driven by resource limitations and higher infection burdens. Rates vary markedly by procedure type, as shown in the following selected examples from meta-analyses:
Procedure TypePerioperative Mortality RateMajor Complication Rate
Appendectomy<0.1%5-10%
Cholecystectomy<0.1%5-10%
Caesarean Delivery<0.1%10-15%
Intracranial Surgery20-27%30-40%
Typhoid Intestinal Perforation20-27%>40%
These disparities underscore procedure-specific risks, with urgent general surgeries showing 12% morbidity and 2% mortality, often compounded by patient factors like age and comorbidities. Long-term follow-up reveals that complications elevate 1-year mortality to 3-13% post-major surgery, emphasizing the need for vigilant monitoring beyond the immediate perioperative period.

Factors Influencing Outcomes

Patient characteristics significantly affect surgical outcomes, with advanced age associated with higher postoperative complication rates and mortality; for instance, older adults face elevated risks due to reduced physiological reserve and comorbidities. Pre-existing conditions such as (BMI ≥40), , , and independently increase complication risks by up to 40% and prolong recovery, as impairs and oxygenation. Poor nutritional status, assessed via tools like levels, correlates with higher rates and extended hospital stays, while factors like status and influence adherence to postoperative care and overall recovery. Surgeon-specific variables play a critical role, as higher procedural volume and experience reduce complication rates and mortality across specialties; meta-analyses show high-volume surgeons achieve up to 30-50% lower adverse event rates compared to low-volume peers in procedures like cancer resections and . Subspecialty fellowship training and career length further enhance outcomes by refining technical proficiency, though age exhibits mixed effects—older (over 60) may incur slightly higher mortality risks ( 1.2-1.5) due to potential cognitive or dexterity declines, offset in some cases by accumulated expertise. feedback mechanisms, such as performance audits, have demonstrated improvements in outcomes by targeting individual variability. Institutional factors, particularly hospital procedural volume, consistently predict lower operative mortality; high-volume centers report 20-50% reduced death rates for complex surgeries like esophageal resections or coronary artery bypass grafting, attributable to specialized teams, protocols, and resource availability. Operating room organization, including team coordination and equipment standardization, influences efficiency and safety, with systematic reviews linking optimized workflows to shorter operative times and fewer errors. System-related elements like elective versus emergency admission also matter, as planned procedures yield better results due to thorough preoperative optimization.
Factor CategoryKey ExamplesImpact on Outcomes
Patient-RelatedAge >65, comorbidities (e.g., , ), nutritionIncreased complications (up to 40% higher), longer stays
Surgeon-RelatedHigh volume (>50 cases/year), experience >10 yearsReduced mortality (20-50% lower), fewer errors
Hospital-RelatedHigh volume (>100 cases/year), specialized teamsLower operative mortality (OR 0.32-0.64)
Psychological and environmental influences, such as preoperative anxiety or seasonal variations (e.g., higher rates in summer), can modulate and healing, though evidence remains tentative and procedure-specific. Overall, multivariable risk models like ASA integrate these factors to predict outcomes, emphasizing the need for tailored risk stratification over generalized assumptions.

Special Populations and Considerations

Pediatric Surgery

Pediatric surgery is defined as the diagnostic, operative, and postoperative management of surgical conditions in patients from fetal life through , focusing on congenital anomalies, neoplastic diseases, trauma, and acquired disorders unique to developing . Unlike surgery, which often addresses degenerative or chronic conditions, pediatric surgery deals predominantly with malformations present at birth or developmental issues, necessitating adaptations for smaller anatomical structures, immature organ systems, and higher metabolic rates that increase risks of , fluid imbalance, and rapid decompensation under . Children exhibit distinct complication profiles, such as elevated surgical site rates in procedures like (4.12% versus 1.40% in adults), underscoring the need for specialized techniques like minimally invasive approaches tailored to limited body reserves. Common procedures include for acute , repair, placement of tympanostomy tubes for recurrent , and corrections of congenital defects such as via or anorectal malformations through posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Neonatal interventions, comprising up to 20% of cases, often involve urgent management of conditions like or , while surgeries address tumors like or . In the United States, approximately 3.9 million pediatric surgical procedures occur annually, with , , and operations (e.g., tonsillectomies) being most frequent excluding circumcisions. Key challenges stem from anatomical variability across growth stages, psychological impacts on young patients requiring family involvement, and disparities in access, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where 1.7 billion children lack timely care, leading to elevated morbidity from untreated congenital issues. Outcomes improve with high-volume centers and experienced pediatric-trained surgeons, who achieve lower mortality than general surgeons treating similar cases; for instance, 30-day stands at 0.7% across 103,444 U.S. procedures, though rates climb to 2.99% or higher in resource-limited settings due to and delay factors. The specialty's formal recognition traces to the mid-20th century, with William E. Ladd establishing foundational texts and techniques in the 1930s-1960s, enabling systematic approaches to previously high-fatality conditions like intestinal obstruction.

Geriatric Surgery

Geriatric surgery encompasses surgical procedures performed on patients aged years and older, a demographic increasingly undergoing operations due to extended life expectancies and chronic conditions. While chronological age contributes modestly to postoperative risks, outcomes are predominantly influenced by physiological decline, , and frailty rather than age alone. Frailty, characterized by diminished physiological reserves and vulnerability to stressors, affects approximately 4.9–28% of individuals aged and older, markedly elevating complication rates. Preoperative evaluation in geriatric patients emphasizes comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), a multidimensional tool evaluating functional status, cognition, nutrition, polypharmacy, and social support to optimize outcomes. CGA identifies modifiable risks such as frailty and depressive symptoms, enabling interventions like nutritional support or medication reconciliation before elective procedures. Studies indicate CGA reduces postoperative morbidity and mortality in frail elderly patients undergoing elective surgery, with meta-analyses showing decreased complication rates compared to standard assessments. Intraoperative and postoperative management must account for heightened susceptibility to , infections, and functional decline, with frail patients facing 30-day mortality odds ratios up to 4.62 times higher than nonfrail peers. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, adapted for elderly patients, demonstrate benefits in reducing length of stay and complications through multimodal analgesia, early , and minimized , though evidence underscores the need for frailty-specific tailoring. Long-term data reveal that 1 in 5 older adults experiences persistent functional decline 30 days post-surgery, while 1-year mortality post-major procedures reaches 14% in community-dwelling elders, exacerbated by frailty and . Routine frailty screening, such as via the Clinical Frailty Scale, predicts 1-year mortality effectively, with implementation linked to reductions from 20.2% to 16.0% in frail cohorts. Despite these advances, geriatric surgery outcomes lag behind younger populations, with 5-year cumulative major surgery risk at 13.8% among Medicare beneficiaries, highlighting the imperative for integrated, patient-centered risk stratification.

Surgery in Pregnancy and High-Risk Groups

Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy occurs in approximately 0.2% to 2% of gestations, with appendectomy and cholecystectomy comprising the most frequent procedures. Maternal perioperative complication rates, including reoperation (3.6%), infection (2%), and wound issues (1.4%), approximate 6% for major events within 30 days and do not significantly exceed those in non-pregnant women of comparable age. Fetal risks, however, include elevated incidences of miscarriage (5-7%), preterm labor (15%), preterm delivery, low birth weight, and stillbirth, though anesthesia agents at standard doses show no teratogenic effects or increased malformation rates. When feasible, elective procedures are deferred until postpartum; otherwise, the second trimester minimizes risks, avoiding first-trimester organogenesis vulnerabilities and third-trimester uterine displacement or preterm labor triggers. Anesthetic management prioritizes regional techniques over general to reduce aspiration risk from pregnancy-related gastric changes and potential fetal exposure concerns, though no agents demonstrate causality for adverse outcomes beyond baseline risks. Multidisciplinary consultation, including , is essential, alongside venous thromboembolism prophylaxis given heightened hypercoagulability. Laparoscopic approaches are viable for abdominal cases, with pressures limited to 12-15 mmHg and left lateral tilt to preserve uteroplacental . High-risk surgical patients are typified by those with estimated exceeding 5% or undergoing major procedures amid substantial physiological reserve deficits, often encompassing comorbidities such as , chronic pulmonary or renal impairment, , and . This cohort represents about 12.5% of surgical volume yet accounts for over 80% of postoperative deaths, driven by exacerbation under surgical stress. Perioperative optimization targets modifiable factors: glycemic control to avert hyperglycemia-induced infections, to mitigate pulmonary complications, nutritional repletion for frailty, and targeted prehabilitation like exercise to enhance reserve. Risk stratification employs tools assessing functional capacity and burden, guiding decisions on timing—delaying non-urgent cases for stabilization reduces mortality odds, as unmanaged conditions like decompensated amplify ischemia or failure risks. Multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation, including for beta-blocker or fluid , curtails events; studies indicate such interventions alter in most cases, yielding lower complication rates. Intraoperatively, advanced hemodynamic monitoring addresses hypoperfusion in vulnerable patients, while postoperative protocols emphasize early and to counter . Despite optimizations, absolute mortality remains elevated, underscoring causal links between preoperative frailty and outcomes independent of surgical skill.

History of Surgery

Prehistoric and Ancient Practices

Evidence of prehistoric surgery is primarily derived from archaeological findings of trephination, the oldest known surgical intervention, with specimens dating back 7,000 to 10,000 years. Healed cranial trepanations, indicating patient survival post-procedure, have been identified in sites across , such as 120 skulls from around 6,500 BCE, and the Ensisheim skeleton providing the earliest unequivocal evidence of successful healing. These procedures involved scraping or drilling holes in the skull, likely to alleviate , treat headaches, or for ritualistic purposes, with survival rates estimated at 70-90% based on bone regrowth patterns observed in global sites from the era onward. In , surgical practices are documented in the , a copied circa 1600 BCE from an original dating to approximately 3000 BCE, detailing 48 cases of trauma with objective assessments of wounds, fractures, and dislocations. The text describes examinations, diagnoses, and treatments including bandaging, splinting, and suturing for head, neck, and spinal injuries, emphasizing empirical observation over supernatural explanations and noting complications like from spinal cord damage. Egyptian surgeons also performed procedures such as tumor excisions and repairs, using tools like knives, drills, and as an , reflecting advanced knowledge of from mummification practices. Ancient Greek surgery advanced under (circa 460-377 BCE), who advocated rational, observation-based methods in the , covering fracture reductions, wound debridement, and the use of bronze instruments like scalpels and trephines. Techniques included suppurative drainage for abscesses and cautious cautery to control bleeding, with emphasis on prognosis and non-intervention when outcomes were poor, as in advanced tumors. In , the (circa 600 BCE) by outlined over 300 surgical procedures, including pioneering via forehead flap for nasal reconstruction—often necessitated by punitive amputations—and cataract couching, alongside classifications of surgical instruments and training on cadavers or fruits. Roman surgery built on Greek foundations, as detailed by in De Medicina (1st century CE), which systematically described excisions, ligatures for , and treatments for hernias and lithotomies using specialized tools like and probes. (129-216 CE) further contributed through vivisections on animals, advancing vascular and anatomy knowledge, and promoting wound irrigation to prevent infection, though practices remained limited by high risks without antisepsis. In ancient , (circa 140-208 CE) reportedly performed laparotomies and tissue removals under mafeisan, a concoction inducing unconsciousness, marking an early, albeit legend-tinged, approach to general for internal surgeries.

Medieval and Early Modern Developments

During the medieval period, surgical practices in Europe stagnated following the fall of the , with knowledge preserved primarily through monastic traditions and limited to basic procedures like trephination and wound dressing, often performed by barber-surgeons rather than physicians. In contrast, Islamic scholars advanced surgery significantly; al-Zahrawi (936–1013), known as Albucasis, authored Kitab al-Tasrif, a 30-volume encyclopedia that described over 200 surgical instruments—many still in use today—and detailed procedures including , , and early techniques such as repairing facial defects with skin flaps. pioneered the use of for internal sutures, advocated for sterilization of instruments with alcohol, and was the first to describe the hereditary nature of hemophilia, influencing European surgery after translations reached the West in the . In 14th-century Europe, amid the , Guy de Chauliac (c. 1300–1368), often called the father of Western surgery, wrote Chirurgia Magna (1363), a systematic dividing surgery into categories like swellings, wounds, ulcers, fractures, and special diseases, emphasizing conservative management, diet, and over aggressive interventions. De Chauliac advocated for surgeons to possess broad knowledge in , , and , performed self-experiments during the plague, and promoted wound treatment with wine irrigation rather than unchecked cautery, though practices remained rudimentary without or antisepsis, leading to high rates. The , beginning with the , marked a revival through and empirical observation, with (1514–1564) publishing De humani corporis fabrica in 1543, based on direct dissections that corrected Galenic errors in anatomy, such as the number of cranial bones and muscle structures, enabling more precise surgical applications. (c. 1510–1590), a French , revolutionized care by introducing ligatures with thread instead of pouring boiling oil on injuries—a common but destructive practice—reducing pain and tissue damage, and developing prosthetic limbs and artificial eyes for amputees. Paré's emphasis on gentle, evidence-based techniques, including the use of soothing ointments, shifted surgery toward patient-centered care, though mortality from hemorrhage and infection persisted due to absent germ theory. Anatomy theaters emerged in universities like by the late , facilitating public s and anatomical studies that informed surgical innovations, while figures like ab Aquapendente (1537–1619) described venous valves, laying groundwork for circulatory understanding. These developments elevated surgery's status, bridging it closer to , though restrictions and religious prohibitions on slowed progress in some regions until the .

19th and 20th Century Advancements

In the 19th century, surgery evolved from rudimentary procedures to more ambitious interventions, driven by improved anatomical knowledge and operative boldness despite high risks. performed the first successful ovariotomy in 1809, removing a large ovarian tumor from patient Jane Todd Crawford without anesthesia, with the patient surviving the 25-minute procedure. This marked a pioneering step in , previously deemed fatal due to peritonitis risks. In 1813, John Syng Dorsey authored The Elements of Surgery, the first systematic American textbook on the subject, compiling European advances and promoting standardized techniques. Later in the century, advanced gastric surgery by completing the first successful partial on January 29, 1881, resecting a pyloric tumor and restoring continuity via gastroduodenostomy, with the patient surviving initially. Such operations expanded the scope of elective abdominal procedures, including early hysterectomies, though mortality remained high until infection control improved. progressed with refinements in fracture management and limb salvage, influenced by military needs and anatomical studies, laying groundwork for reconstructive techniques. The 20th century brought transformative milestones, including and specialized cardiac interventions. In 1905, Eduard Zirm achieved the first successful corneal transplant, restoring vision in a patient with leukoma. in 1928 by drastically reduced postoperative infections, enabling safer complex surgeries. Joseph Murray performed the first successful kidney transplant in 1954 between identical twins, averting rejection without immunosuppression and earning the 1990 . Cardiovascular advancements included Eliot Cutler's 1923 heart valve replacement, the first such procedure to succeed. These developments, alongside endoscopic innovations like early in 1901, shifted surgery toward precision and reduced invasiveness.

Antisepsis, Anesthesia, and Infection Control

The development of general anesthesia revolutionized surgical procedures by eliminating patient pain and enabling more intricate operations. On October 16, 1846, Boston dentist William T. G. Morton publicly demonstrated the inhalation of diethyl ether to anesthetize a patient during a tumor excision at Massachusetts General Hospital, an event termed "Ether Day." Morton had previously tested ether on animals and for dental extractions, securing a patent for its anesthetic use in November 1846, though enforcement efforts failed. This breakthrough, building on prior private experiments, rapidly disseminated globally, with ether and later chloroform adopted for surgeries, reducing operative speed constraints imposed by patient agony. Despite anesthesia's advances, postoperative infections—often fatal gangrene or sepsis—persisted as primary surgical killers, with mortality rates exceeding 50% in some hospitals pre-1860s. British surgeon , drawing from Louis Pasteur's 1860s germ theory linking microbes to , pioneered antisepsis to inhibit bacterial growth in wounds. In August 1865, Lister first applied carbolic acid (phenol) diluted in dressings to a compound leg fracture, noting recovery without infection; he refined this into a using 5% carbolic acid lotions, sprays via "donkey engines," and instrument immersion. Lister's March 1867 paper in detailed the "antiseptic principle," reporting zero in treated compound fractures over nine months at , contrasting historical 45% mortality. His methods, including surgeon and operative site spraying, halved amputation mortality to under 15% by 1869. Initial resistance stemmed from carbolic acid's toxicity and odors, but empirical success—evidenced by falling ward rates—compelled adoption, establishing antisepsis as foundational to modern control. Antisepsis transitioned to asepsis by the 1880s-1890s, prioritizing sterility to exclude germs entirely rather than countering them chemically. Robert Koch's 1876-1881 isolation of pathogens like and bacteria, alongside his solid media culturing techniques, enabled precise sterilization protocols. German surgeons, such as Ernst von Bergmann, introduced steam autoclaving for instruments in 1886 and operative masks; American surgeon William Halsted mandated rubber gloves in 1890 after observing from antiseptics, reducing hand contamination. These aseptic measures, verified by plummeting surgical site rates to below 5% by 1900, supplanted antisepsis in sterile environments, cementing causal links between microbial exclusion and survival. Together, and control innovations elevated surgery's safety, expanding elective procedures and specialty growth.

Late 20th and 21st Century Innovations

The late 20th century marked a shift toward minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with emerging as a transformative technique for abdominal procedures. Building on earlier endoscopic developments from the , the first modern laparoscopic was performed in 1987 by Philippe Mouret in , utilizing a camera and specialized instruments inserted through small incisions to remove the without large open cuts. This innovation reduced postoperative pain, hospital stays, and complication rates compared to traditional open surgery, with studies showing recovery times shortened from weeks to days. By the , expanded to gynecologic, urologic, and thoracic applications, driven by advancements in video technology and techniques that maintained intra-abdominal visibility. Robotic-assisted surgery further refined MIS in the early , addressing limitations of rigid laparoscopic tools like limited dexterity and two-dimensional views. The first use of a surgical on a occurred in 1985 with the PUMA 560 system for stereotactic brain biopsies, providing precise, tremor-free positioning. The , introduced commercially in 1999 and granted FDA approval for general laparoscopic surgery in 2000, incorporated articulated instruments, high-definition 3D visualization, and surgeon-controlled consoles, enabling complex procedures such as prostatectomies with reduced blood loss and faster convalescence. Over 10 million da Vinci procedures have been performed globally by 2023, with adoption in specialties like cardiac and demonstrating improved outcomes in select cases, though high costs and training demands limit universal application. Advances in during this period enhanced viability and accessibility through refined and preservation methods. The introduction of cyclosporine in 1983 revolutionized outcomes by selectively inhibiting T-cell activation, boosting one-year kidney graft survival from around 50% to over 80%. Split-liver transplantation, pioneered in 1988, allowed one donor liver to serve two recipients, addressing pediatric shortages and expanding the donor pool. In the , machine technologies supplanted static cold storage, improving organ assessment and reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury, with normothermic enabling up to 24-hour preservation for marginal donors. trials advanced notably, including the first genetically modified transplant into a in , offering potential solutions to chronic organ shortages amid waiting lists exceeding 100,000 in the U.S. alone. Emerging technologies like and integrated into surgical workflows by the 2010s, enabling customized implants and predictive modeling. 3D-printed anatomical models from CT scans facilitated precise preoperative planning for complex tumor resections, reducing operative times by up to 20% in orthopedic and maxillofacial cases. algorithms, trained on vast imaging datasets, now assist in real-time tissue identification and during procedures, enhancing accuracy in and . These developments, while promising, face challenges including regulatory hurdles and equitable access, with ongoing research emphasizing evidence-based validation over hype.

Surgical Training and Professional Development

Residency and Fellowship Programs

In the United States, general surgery residency programs require a minimum of five years of postgraduate training following medical school graduation, structured across postgraduate years (PGY) 1 through 5 with progressive increases in clinical responsibility and operative autonomy. Programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandate at least 48 weeks of full-time clinical activity annually, rotations through core services such as trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and endocrine surgery, and no more than three training institutions to ensure continuity. Residents must demonstrate competencies in patient care, medical knowledge, and technical skills, often logging hundreds of operative cases by graduation, with chief residents (PGY-5) managing complex procedures independently. Entry into these programs occurs via the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), where in the 2024 Main Residency Match, general surgery saw heightened applicant interest amid an overall 93.8% position fill rate across specialties, reflecting sustained competitiveness for categorical positions. Fellowship programs extend for subspecialization, typically lasting 1 to 3 years after residency completion, with requirements emphasizing advanced operative volume, , and specialized clinical rotations. For instance, complex general fellowships demand two years of ACGME-accredited with increasing responsibility and a minimum of 48 weeks of clinical activity per year, focusing on multidisciplinary cancer management. Surgical critical care fellowships, often 1-2 years, integrate management with surgical decision-making, preparing fellows for by the American Board of Surgery. Other subspecialties, such as vascular or , follow similar NRMP or specialty-specific matching processes, with durations varying from 6 to 36 months based on program design and operative thresholds. Internationally, surgical residency structures diverge significantly from the U.S. model, with durations ranging from 4 to 8 years and varying integration of general and subspecialty phases; for example, many European countries employ a core training period (2-3 years) followed by specialty-specific advancement, often without a centralized national match. A 2021 global analysis of 23 countries revealed inconsistencies in entrance exams, logbook requirements, and assessment methods, such as competency-based evaluations in the UK versus time-based models elsewhere, underscoring challenges in standardizing outcomes amid resource disparities. In low- and middle-income nations, training may emphasize high-volume trauma and essential procedures due to workforce shortages, contrasting with research-oriented programs in high-income settings. These variations highlight causal factors like regulatory frameworks and healthcare funding, influencing surgeon preparedness and migration patterns, such as international medical graduates facing barriers to U.S. equivalency certification.

Simulation and Skill Acquisition

Simulation-based training has become integral to surgical education, enabling trainees to develop psychomotor skills, decision-making, and procedural competence in controlled environments without exposing patients to undue risk. This approach addresses limitations in traditional apprenticeship models, where operative exposure varies and early errors can occur during learning curves. Empirical studies demonstrate that simulation enhances technical proficiency, with meta-analyses indicating superior performance in simulated tasks compared to no training, though transfer to live surgery requires deliberate practice frameworks. Surgical simulators encompass physical and virtual modalities. Physical models include synthetic bench-top trainers, animal tissues, and cadaveric specimens, which provide tactile feedback mimicking tissue handling and instrument manipulation; for instance, porcine models replicate vascular anatomy for endovascular procedures. Virtual reality (VR) simulators, often computer-based with haptic interfaces, allow repeatable scenarios in laparoscopic or robotic surgery, offering metrics like path length and economy of motion for objective assessment. Augmented reality integrates digital overlays onto physical setups, while low-fidelity box trainers emphasize basic instrument control. Evidence from systematic reviews supports both types for skill improvement, with VR showing advantages in scalability and cost over time, though physical models excel in realism for open procedures. Skill acquisition follows principles of and proficiency-based progression, where trainees repeat tasks until predefined benchmarks are met, reducing variability in real operating rooms. Meta-analyses confirm transferability: for example, VR training in robot-assisted surgery shortens operative times and improves technical scores , with effect sizes indicating 20-30% gains in efficiency. In orthopaedics, simulator use correlates with better arthroscopic performance metrics, persisting months post-training. However, not all simulations yield equivalent outcomes; low-fidelity models suffice for novices, but high-fidelity VR benefits advanced learners facing steep curves in minimally invasive techniques. Patient outcome data remain limited, with some reviews finding reduced complications in trained cohorts, though confounding factors like case volume complicate causation. Challenges include high initial costs for VR systems (often exceeding $100,000 per unit) and validation gaps, as many simulators lack standardized curricula or long-term retention studies. Institutional adoption varies, with resource constraints in low-income settings favoring low-cost physical alternatives. Despite these, regulatory bodies like the endorse simulation for core competencies, integrating it into residency milestones to ensure measurable skill progression before independent practice. Ongoing research emphasizes hybrid models combining VR with to optimize causal links between simulated deliberate practice and operative safety.

Certification and Continuing Education

In the United States, board certification in surgery is administered by organizations such as the American Board of Surgery (ABS), a voluntary process requiring completion of at least five years of accredited residency training in or a , followed by passing a qualifying examination (written) and a certifying examination (oral). Eligibility typically demands graduation from an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)- or Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of (RCPSC)-accredited program, with international applicants generally required to complete equivalent U.S. or Canadian training before entering the process. Certification signifies adherence to standards of professionalism and patient care but does not guarantee competence, as it relies on exam performance rather than ongoing practice evaluation alone. Maintenance of certification has shifted from traditional decennial recertification to the ABS Continuous Certification program, implemented to promote through biannual online assessments starting two years after initial certification, alongside requirements for cognitive exams, professional standing, and practice improvement activities. Diplomates must demonstrate an unrestricted and engage in outcomes-based assessments, with failure to comply risking loss of certified status. Subspecialty certifications, such as in vascular or , follow similar pathways but may incorporate additional fellowship training and exams. Continuing medical education (CME) is integral to certification maintenance, with ABS requiring participation in accredited activities focused on surgical knowledge and practice improvement, though specific hours vary by state licensing boards— for instance, many mandate 50 AMA PRA Category 1 credits per biennial cycle. The supports CME through publications, courses, and events tailored to surgical standards, emphasizing evidence-based updates over generic credits. Internationally, certification lacks unified standards, with bodies like the European Board of Surgery or national equivalents imposing residency durations, exams, and recertification via audits or CME, though global efforts for harmonization remain aspirational without enforceable oversight. These mechanisms aim to counter skill obsolescence amid advancing techniques, yet empirical data on their impact on surgical outcomes shows mixed results, with certification correlating modestly to lower complication rates in some studies.

Technological and Innovative Advances

Robotic and Minimally Invasive Techniques

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) encompasses procedures that utilize small incisions, specialized instruments, and imaging technologies such as to access internal structures, reducing tissue trauma compared to traditional open surgery. These techniques, including and , enable visualization and manipulation through ports typically 5-12 mm in diameter, leading to outcomes like decreased postoperative pain, shorter stays, and lower rates in many applications. Empirical data from meta-analyses indicate that MIS often results in less blood loss and fewer conversions to open procedures relative to conventional methods. Laparoscopic surgery, a cornerstone of MIS, traces its modern origins to early 20th-century experiments; Georg Kelling performed the first celioscopy on dogs in 1901, followed by Hans Christian Jacobaeus's human procedures in 1910 using a cystoscope for thoracic exploration. Key milestones include Kurt Semm's first laparoscopic in 1980 and the inaugural laparoscopic in 1987 by Philippe Mouret in , with widespread adoption accelerating after U.S. implementations in 1988. By the 1990s, advancements in high-resolution cameras, techniques for , and disposable trocars facilitated broader use across specialties like gynecology and , supported by reduced recovery times evidenced in randomized trials showing hospital stays shortened by 2-4 days for cholecystectomies. Robotic-assisted surgery builds on MIS by incorporating telemanipulator systems that translate surgeon hand movements into precise, scaled instrument actions at the console, offering enhanced dexterity, three-dimensional visualization, and tremor filtration. The da Vinci Surgical System, developed by Intuitive Surgical and first commercially available in 2001 after FDA approval in 2000 for general laparoscopic procedures, dominates the field with over 12 million surgeries performed by 2023. Peer-reviewed studies report benefits such as lower conversion rates (e.g., 1-2% versus 5-10% in laparoscopy for prostatectomies) and reduced blood transfusions in procedures like hysterectomies, attributed to improved ergonomics and instrument articulation beyond human wrist limits. However, robotic approaches can extend operative times by 20-50 minutes initially due to setup and docking, and lack of haptic feedback poses risks of tissue injury, as noted in systematic reviews. From 2020 to 2025, robotic systems evolved with models like the da Vinci 5, incorporating force-sensing instruments and AI-driven analytics for case insights, yielding up to 25% reductions in operative time and 30% fewer intraoperative complications in AI-assisted cases per recent trials. Competition from platforms like Medtronic's Hugo and Stryker's Mako has expanded applications to orthopedics and ambulatory settings, with data showing decreased surgeon fatigue and readmissions in emergent . Despite these gains, high costs—systems exceeding $2 million plus annual maintenance—and variable superiority over conventional in randomized controlled trials underscore the need for procedure-specific evidence; for instance, robotic colorectal resections show no consistent survival advantage over open surgery in long-term outcomes. requirements, often exceeding 100 console hours, and ergonomic challenges like arm clashes further limit diffusion, though simulation-based programs mitigate learning curves.

AI, Imaging, and Diagnostics Integration

Artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly integrated with surgical imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), (MRI), and , to refine diagnostics and procedural workflows. AI algorithms excel at segmenting anatomical structures from imaging data, enabling the reconstruction of three-dimensional (3D) models from two-dimensional scans, which supports precise preoperative planning and reduces operative variability. For example, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to CT angiography achieve segmentation accuracies exceeding 90% for vascular structures, facilitating simulations of interventions like aneurysm repairs. This integration leverages to quantify tissue densities and predict biomechanical behaviors, drawing on datasets from over 10,000 patient scans in validated models. In preoperative diagnostics, AI augments traditional by detecting subtle pathologies that evade human oversight, such as early-stage tumors in thoracic surgery via analysis of CT scans, where AI models report sensitivity rates up to 95% compared to 85% for radiologists alone. Peer-reviewed studies demonstrate AI's role in risk stratification, integrating features with electronic health records to forecast postoperative complications with areas under the curve (AUC) values of 0.85-0.92 in orthopedic cases. In orthopedics specifically, AI processes radiographs to identify implant types, detect loosening, and estimate bone dimensions, informing implant selection and reducing revision rates by up to 20% in simulated cohorts. These tools prioritize empirical validation through prospective trials, though academic sources occasionally overstate generalizability without accounting for dataset biases toward high-resource settings. Intraoperatively, AI fuses real-time imaging with preoperative models for augmented guidance, as in robotic systems where algorithms overlay tumor margins onto endoscopic views with sub-millimeter precision. For instance, AI-driven navigation in correlates intraoperative with MRI data to track shift, adjusting trajectories dynamically and correlating with reduced morbidity in studies involving 500+ cases. Diagnostic integration extends to , where AI analyzes frozen sections during procedures, classifying margins with 92% accuracy in breast cancer resections, expediting decisions without compromising oncologic outcomes. Postoperative applications include AI-monitored imaging for complication detection, such as anastomotic leaks via serial CT analysis, achieving predictive AUCs of 0.88. Despite these advances, AI's diagnostic performance varies, with meta-analyses of 83 studies reporting pooled accuracies around 52-70% for certain tasks, underscoring the need for hybrid human-AI workflows to mitigate false positives from data imbalances. Regulatory approvals, such as FDA clearance for AI aids since , emphasize prospective validation over retrospective benchmarks to ensure causal efficacy in diverse populations.

Regenerative Medicine and Transplants

encompasses surgical techniques that leverage , biomaterials, and to repair or regenerate damaged tissues, reducing the need for prosthetic replacements or donor organs. In , tissue-engineered scaffolds seeded with patient-derived cells promote endogenous healing; for instance, 3D-printed scaffolds loaded with antibiotics have been implanted to prevent infections while supporting regeneration in maxillofacial defects. therapies, such as mesenchymal stem cells derived from , are surgically delivered to sites of injury, as in orthopedic procedures for repair, where clinical trials demonstrate improved tissue integration and reduced compared to autografts. In plastic and , enhance fat grafting outcomes by promoting vascularization and volume retention, with studies reporting up to 80% graft survival rates in post-mastectomy. Tissue engineering advances, including of cellular constructs, enable customized implants for surgical applications like skin grafts and bone scaffolds, addressing limitations of donor shortages and rejection risks inherent in traditional transplants. Bovine bone scaffolds augmented with antimicrobial nanoparticles, such as silver or , have shown superior osteointegration in head and neck reconstructions, minimizing surgical site infections that affect up to 10% of such procedures. These approaches prioritize and host integration, with preclinical data indicating sustained functionality over 12 months in alveolar cleft repairs using mononuclear cells combined with beta-tricalcium phosphate. Organ transplantation surgery involves precise harvesting, preservation, and implantation techniques to restore function in end-stage organ failure, with innovations like perfusion systems allowing surgeons to evaluate and resuscitate marginal donor organs prior to . Machine has increased utilization by 20-30% in some centers by mitigating ischemia-reperfusion through controlled oxygenation and delivery during . represents a surgical , with gene-edited kidneys transplanted into living humans under compassionate use in 2023-2024, involving vascular adapted for interspecies compatibility and yielding initial graft function for days to weeks before rejection. By March 2025, FDA approvals enabled clinical trials for such procedures, incorporating CRISPR-modified organs to mitigate hyperacute rejection, though long-term immunological barriers persist. Regenerative strategies intersect with transplantation through bioengineered composites, such as decellularized scaffolds repopulated with autologous cells for vascularized tissue implants, potentially extending graft viability. enhancements, including for localized , are being integrated into surgical protocols to prolong allograft survival without systemic toxicity. Despite these progresses, challenges like immune incompatibility and ethical sourcing of donor tissues underscore the need for rigorous clinical validation, with ongoing trials emphasizing patient-specific outcomes over generalized efficacy claims.

Surgical Specialties and Subfields

General and Trauma Surgery

General surgery encompasses the operative management of a broad spectrum of conditions affecting the alimentary tract, abdomen, breast, skin, and soft tissue, including endocrine system procedures such as thyroidectomy, as well as surgical critical care and oncologic principles. General surgeons are trained to diagnose and treat diseases requiring surgical intervention across multiple organ systems, often serving as the primary operators for emergent and elective cases in community and academic settings. Common procedures include appendectomy for acute appendicitis, cholecystectomy for gallstones, and inguinal hernia repair, which collectively account for a significant portion of general surgical volume; for instance, U.S. general surgeons perform an average of 224 operations annually across approximately 23 procedure types. Trauma surgery, frequently integrated within or acute care surgery fellowships, focuses on the immediate assessment, , and operative intervention for life-threatening injuries from blunt or penetrating mechanisms, such as motor vehicle collisions or gunshots. Key techniques include , which prioritizes rapid control of hemorrhage and contamination followed by temporary abdominal closure to address metabolic derangements like and before definitive repair. Nonoperative management has expanded for hemodynamically stable patients with blunt , guided by high-quality CT imaging and serial examinations, reducing the need for in select cases. Training for general surgeons requires a five-year residency program emphasizing progressive operative experience, with at least 48 weeks of full-time clinical activity per year and certification via the American Board of Surgery following examinations. Trauma specialization often involves additional one- to two-year fellowships in surgical critical care or acute care surgery, incorporating skills like those taught in Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) courses for penetrating injuries and Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposure in Trauma (ASSET) for vascular and visceral access. These programs ensure proficiency in high-stakes environments, where injury remains a leading cause of death, particularly among younger populations.

Organ-Specific Specialties

Organ-specific surgical specialties concentrate on the operative treatment of diseases affecting particular organs or anatomical regions, demanding precise knowledge of organ , , and tailored instrumentation. These fields have evolved with advancements in , minimally invasive methods, and perioperative care, leading to improved outcomes such as reduced mortality rates in procedures like coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), where survival approaches 97-98% in uncomplicated cases. Key specialties include , , orthopedic, urologic, and ophthalmic surgery, each addressing unique challenges from congenital defects to degenerative conditions. Cardiac surgery, often encompassing thoracic procedures, involves interventions on the heart and great vessels, such as CABG for ischemic disease and valve repairs or replacements for valvular dysfunction. In 2021, operative mortality for isolated surgical (SAVR) was 2.3%, rising to 10% when combined with procedures, reflecting procedural complexity and patient comorbidities. Over the past two decades, adult mortality has declined by two-thirds, from 3.3% in 2007 to 1.1% in 2019, attributable to refined techniques and multidisciplinary management. Neurosurgery targets the central and peripheral nervous systems, performing procedures like craniotomies for tumor resection, spinal decompressions for , and aneurysm clippings or coiling. Specialization in cranial or spinal domains correlates with lower predicted mortality and complications, independent of hospital volume. Outcomes vary by case; for instance, surgical decompression in reduces fatality compared to medical management alone, though functional recovery metrics show mixed results in randomized trials. Orthopedic surgery addresses musculoskeletal disorders, with common operations including total knee and hip arthroplasties, which numbered about 1.25 million in the in 2019, projected to double by 2050 due to aging populations. However, evidence from randomized trials supports efficacy over non-operative care primarily for release and total knee replacement among ten frequent elective procedures, highlighting gaps in robust data for alternatives like arthroscopic meniscal repairs. Urologic surgery manages genitourinary tract conditions through procedures such as prostatectomies for cancer, nephrectomies for renal tumors, and endourologic interventions for stones via ureteroscopy or . Minimally invasive robotic-assisted approaches, including radical cystectomy for , predominate, offering reduced recovery times compared to open surgery. remains a prevalent outpatient procedure for male sterilization, with reversal options available but variable success in restoring . Ophthalmic surgery focuses on ocular structures, employing techniques like for cataracts and femtosecond laser-assisted procedures for refractive correction. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) enhances precision in capsulotomy and fragmentation, improving visual outcomes over traditional methods in select cases. Advancements in intraocular lenses and AI-guided imaging further refine results, minimizing complications in high-volume centers.

Emerging and Interventional Subfields

represents an emerging subfield focused on intrauterine interventions to address congenital anomalies, aiming to mitigate postnatal morbidity or mortality. Pioneered in the late , it gained empirical validation through randomized trials such as the 2011 Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS), which enrolled 158 fetuses and demonstrated that prenatal repair of reduced the risk of ventriculoperitoneal shunting by 47% at 12 months compared to postnatal repair, alongside improvements in motor function at 30 months. Recent advancements include fetoscopic techniques, which minimize maternal risks via smaller incisions and endoscopic access; for instance, a 2023 review highlighted over 500 fetoscopic myelomeningocele repairs worldwide by 2022, with preterm delivery rates around 80% but improved neurodevelopmental outcomes in select cases. These procedures, performed by multidisciplinary teams of pediatric surgeons, obstetricians, and neonatologists, underscore causal mechanisms where early structural correction alters disease progression, though long-term data remain limited by small cohorts and ethical constraints on controls. Lymphatic surgery has emerged as a microsurgical subfield targeting lymphedema, a chronic condition affecting up to 250 million people globally, often post-cancer lymphadenectomy. Techniques like lymphovenous bypass, involving supermicrosurgical anastomosis of lymphatic channels (0.1-0.5 mm diameter) to veins, restore physiologic drainage; a 2021 meta-analysis of 511 patients reported volume reductions of 33-55% at 12 months, with complication rates under 5%. Vascularized lymph node transfer, relocating healthy nodes to affected areas, complements this, with 2024 case series showing sustained edema relief in 70-80% of upper extremity cases via indocyanine green imaging for vessel mapping. Primarily practiced by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, these interventions prioritize empirical selection of early-stage patients (International Society of Lymphology stage I-II), where lymphatic regeneration potential is highest, challenging prior conservative-only paradigms but requiring rigorous outcome tracking amid variable etiology-specific responses. Interventional subfields, particularly endovascular surgery within , emphasize catheter-based, image-guided procedures to treat arterial and venous pathologies, often supplanting open operations. (EVAR), introduced in 1991, now accounts for over 80% of repairs in high-income settings; the 2023 EVAR trial follow-up of 1,252 patients confirmed lower 30-day mortality (1.3% vs. 2.9% for open) but equivalent long-term survival due to reintervention needs in 20-30%. Hybrid approaches, combining endovascular stenting with limited open surgery, address complex aortoiliac disease; a 2022 systematic review of 2,847 cases reported technical success rates of 95% and 5-year patency of 75-85% for iliac interventions. Performed by vascular surgeons trained in and device deployment, these methods leverage real-time causal feedback from , reducing morbidity from incision-related complications, though device durability and endoleak risks necessitate surveillance, with adoption driven by Medicare data showing cost savings of $10,000-20,000 per case. These subfields reflect surgery's shift toward precision and minimal invasiveness, informed by prospective data rather than anecdotal tradition, yet face challenges in and access; for example, fetal centers number fewer than 20 worldwide as of 2024, concentrated in academic hubs. Ongoing trials, such as those evaluating gene-edited lymphatic therapies, signal further evolution, prioritizing verifiable efficacy over institutional biases favoring established paradigms.

Economic and Societal Impacts

Costs and Healthcare Economics

Surgery constitutes a substantial component of healthcare expenditures, particularly in high-income nations where procedural volumes and unit prices are elevated. In the United States, inpatient and outpatient surgical care accounted for approximately $8,353 per capita in spending as of recent analyses, far exceeding the average of $3,636 in comparable peer countries. This disparity persists despite similar or lower utilization rates for certain procedures in the U.S., such as coronary artery bypass grafts, where costs per surgery reached $17,183 under public insurance in 2022, compared to lower figures abroad. Specific procedure costs in the U.S. vary widely by complexity and setting. For instance, a liver transplant averaged $1.1 million in 2024, while surgeries ranged from $14,088 to $18,562 depending on outpatient or surgical center use. Without , common operations like appendectomies or cholecystectomies can cost $4,000 to $200,000, contributing to revenues strained by rising labor expenses, which surged $42.5 billion from 2021 to 2023 to total $839 billion annually—nearly 60% of costs. Postoperative complications exacerbate these figures, increasing expenditures by about 200% per procedure while often outpacing reimbursements, thus pressuring finances. Internationally, surgical economics reveal stark contrasts driven by payment models and infrastructure. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), essential surgeries address 30% of the global but face underinvestment, projecting $12.3 trillion in losses from 2015 to 2030 if provision remains inadequate. Catastrophic expenditures affect 33 million individuals yearly for surgery and alone, with 48 million more impoverished by . Conversely, cost-effectiveness analyses indicate most surgical interventions—89% deemed cost-effective and 76% very cost-effective—are viable even in resource-limited settings, particularly low-complexity, high-volume procedures like caesarean sections or repairs. In the U.S., high administrative burdens—estimated at $455 billion combined for hospitals and clinical services in 2021—amplify surgical costs beyond direct clinical inputs, contrasting with more streamlined systems elsewhere that achieve comparable or superior outcomes at lower prices. For example, a projected at $95,282 in the U.S. costs $29,470 in the . These dynamics underscore inefficiencies in pricing opacity and reimbursement, where elective procedure cancellations during disruptions like the revealed monthly revenue losses of $16.3 to $17.7 billion, highlighting surgery's centrality to healthcare economics.

Global Access and Disparities

Approximately 5 billion people, representing over two-thirds of the global population, lack access to safe, affordable, and timely surgical and anesthesia care. This disparity results in an estimated 143 million additional surgical procedures needed annually, primarily in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where nine in ten individuals cannot access basic surgical services.60160-X/fulltext) Postoperative mortality exacerbates the issue, with 3.5 million adults dying within 30 days of surgery each year, a figure exceeding deaths from , , and combined.00985-7/fulltext) Surgical workforce density highlights stark inequalities: high-income countries maintain 34–97 surgeons per 100,000 population, compared to 0.13–1.57 in low-income countries. LMICs, home to 48% of the world's population, possess only 20% of the global surgical workforce, including just 19% of surgeons and 15% of anesthesiologists.70349-3/fulltext) The recommends at least 20–40 specialist surgical, anesthetic, and obstetric providers per 100,000 population for essential care, a benchmark unmet in most LMICs, where densities often fall below 5 per 100,000. Surgical procedure volumes reflect these gaps, with LMICs performing far below the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery's target of 5,000 operations per 100,000 population annually to address essential needs. High-income countries achieve volumes exceeding this threshold, while low-income settings report rates as low as hundreds per 100,000, leading to untreated conditions like trauma, obstetric complications, and cancers.60160-X/fulltext) Contributing factors include inadequate infrastructure, such as operating theaters without reliable electricity or sterilization, and economic barriers where out-of-pocket costs deter care in regions without universal coverage. Rural areas face compounded challenges, with urban concentration of providers leaving remote populations underserved; for instance, has surgeon densities below 1 per 100,000 in many rural districts. Training shortages perpetuate the cycle, as limited residency programs in LMICs fail to scale with demand. Progress toward the 2030 goals of the Commission on Global Surgery remains slow and uneven, particularly in low-income settings, hampered by funding shortfalls and the pandemic's disruption of elective procedures.00985-7/fulltext) Initiatives like task-sharing with non-specialists have expanded access in some areas but raise concerns over quality and long-term sustainability without systemic investment in and facilities.

Productivity and Broader Economic Effects

Surgical interventions enable patients to recover from debilitating conditions, thereby restoring or enhancing labor productivity, though they initially impose short-term costs. Studies indicate that the average productivity loss from work following surgery equates to approximately $13,761 per patient, with variations by procedure; for instance, incurs lower losses compared to total knee replacement. Return-to-work rates differ across surgical types: around 80% for rotator cuff repairs within 6 months, 58% for spinal surgeries, and up to 98% for arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs by 8 weeks median. Multidisciplinary pathways, such as enhanced recovery protocols, accelerate return to work, with one program achieving 93% resumption within three months versus 64-77% in standard care. Specific surgeries yield targeted productivity gains; bariatric procedures, for example, improve employment status and short-term work productivity in systematic reviews of 42 studies, reflecting reduced obesity-related impairments. Robotic-assisted techniques further amplify efficiency, boosting hospital-level production by 21-26% and labor productivity by 29% in English data, through shorter procedures and fewer complications. These gains stem from causal mechanisms like minimized tissue trauma and faster recovery, outweighing initial equipment costs in high-volume settings. On a macroeconomic scale, untreated surgical conditions—encompassing injuries, neoplasms, and digestive diseases—project cumulative global GDP losses of $20.7 trillion (1.25% of potential GDP) from to 2030, with low- and middle-income countries facing up to 2.5% annual output reductions. Inadequate surgical capacity in low-income settings exacerbates this, with unmet needs in alone linked to losses of $388 million to $1.6 billion annually, equivalent to 11-46% of GDP. Conversely, scaling surgical access averts such losses; failure to invest risks undercutting GDP growth in middle-income nations by as much as one-third of projected gains. Cost-effectiveness analyses affirm that most interventions, particularly low-complexity ones, qualify as very cost-effective, with average cost-effectiveness ratios below thresholds in low-resource contexts, yielding net societal returns through preserved participation. These effects underscore surgery's role in causal economic resilience, contingent on and equitable provision to mitigate biases in access favoring higher-income groups. Informed consent in surgery requires that patients receive a clear explanation of the proposed procedure, its purpose, anticipated benefits, material risks, potential complications, and reasonable alternatives, including no intervention, enabling them to make a voluntary decision. This process upholds patient autonomy by affirming the right to over one's body, a derived from standards such as the 1914 U.S. case Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, which established that "every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body." Legally, disclosure must cover risks a reasonable would consider significant, rather than only those deemed notable by physicians, as clarified in cases like Canterbury v. Spence (1972), shifting from physician-centered to patient-centered standards. Failure to obtain valid consent can constitute battery or , exposing surgeons to liability. Core elements of valid consent include patient competence (capacity to understand and reason), adequate disclosure tailored to the individual's context, demonstrated comprehension, and absence of . Competence is presumed for adults unless impaired by conditions like or acute intoxication, assessed via tools evaluating ability rather than mere orientation. In surgical settings, documentation typically involves signed forms, but oral discussions suffice if witnessed, with the focus on over paperwork. Voluntariness excludes , such as financial incentives or family pressure, though therapeutic privilege allows withholding information if disclosure would severely impair , a narrow exception requiring ethical justification. Empirical studies reveal persistent gaps in patient comprehension, undermining despite formal processes. For instance, a review of interventions found baseline understanding of surgical risks and alternatives often below 50% in diverse cohorts, with factors like low , anxiety, and complex terminology contributing to deficits. In vascular surgery patients, only 40-60% correctly identified key risks on procedure-specific quizzes post-consent, highlighting that signed forms do not guarantee grasp of essentials like or alternatives. Methods like teach-back—where patients restate in their words—have improved retention by 20-30% in randomized trials, suggesting interactive approaches over passive reading enhance true informedness. These findings indicate that standard may often fail first-principles requirements for , as incomplete understanding equates to uninformed choice. Special circumstances modify consent protocols to balance urgency with rights. In emergencies, implied consent applies when patients are unconscious or incompetent and immediate intervention prevents death or irreversible harm, as in trauma cases, but only for necessary acts—not exploratory procedures—and requires post-hoc documentation. For minors, parental or guardian consent is standard, though statutes in most U.S. states permit "mature minors" (typically 14-16 years) to consent to certain treatments if deemed competent by physicians or courts, particularly for emancipated youth or reproductive/emergency care. Incompetent adults rely on surrogates following substituted judgment (what the patient would want) or best interests standards, with advance directives overriding if available. Surgical refusal, even against medical advice, exemplifies autonomy, as in Jehovah's Witnesses declining blood transfusions, though courts may intervene for minors if life-threatening. Ethical tensions arise when comprehension barriers or paternalistic biases limit disclosure, potentially eroding trust and increasing litigation risks.

Malpractice, Liability, and Surgical Errors

Surgical malpractice refers to professional negligence by surgeons or surgical teams that deviates from the , resulting in patient harm. Common manifestations include diagnostic errors, improper technique, and failure to obtain , but procedural errors such as wrong-site surgery, wrong-procedure surgery, and unintended retention of foreign objects predominate in claims. These "never events"—preventable incidents with serious consequences—occur despite protocols like the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist, adopted widely since 2009 to mitigate risks through pre-operative verification and team communication. In the United States, where approximately 50 million surgical procedures occur annually, wrong-site or wrong-procedure surgeries affect about 1 in 100,000 cases, while retained surgical items, most often sponges or towels, occur in roughly 1.43 per 10,000 procedures. Reported sentinel events for wrong surgery rose 26% from 2022 to 2023, and unintended retention of foreign objects increased 11%, topping lists from . A 2024 analysis indicated over one-third of surgical patients experience complications, with many attributable to errors like infections or hemorrhages stemming from procedural lapses. Risk factors include emergency operations, unplanned procedural changes, higher patient , and night-shift staffing, which elevate retention odds by up to 4.7-fold in emergent cases. Liability arises when breaches cause compensable , with surgical specialties facing elevated claim rates: general surgeons experience suits in nearly 8% of years, while orthopedic surgeons encounter claims every 3.5 years on average, culminating in 99% lifetime involvement by age 65. payouts exceed $3.8 billion annually, with surgical errors central to high-value verdicts; however, defendants prevail in 80-90% of weak-evidence trials and 50% of strong-merit cases, reflecting evidentiary hurdles in proving causation. Consequences extend beyond patients—errors contribute to surgeon burnout, defensive practices like unnecessary (estimated at $50-100 billion yearly healthcare costs), and reduced procedural volume in high-risk fields. Tort reforms, such as noneconomic damage caps enacted in over 30 states since the , aim to curb liability's chilling effects; studies link them to 2-3% drops in defensive , modest physician supply gains (e.g., 1.5-5% more active surgeons in capped states), and lower premiums. Yet, on is mixed: some analyses show no quality decline, while others correlate reforms with 5-10% rises in adverse events, suggesting weakened deterrence against . Prevention hinges on systemic interventions—standardized timeouts reduced wrong-site errors by 30-50% in trials—over punitive liability alone, as human factors like and communication breakdowns persist despite reforms.

Human Rights and Resource Allocation

Access to essential surgical care has been framed within international human rights frameworks, particularly Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which recognizes the right to the highest attainable standard of health, encompassing availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality of medical services. Proponents argue that essential surgeries—such as those for trauma, obstetrics, and infections—address one-third of the global burden of disease and should be integral to this right, with failure to provide them constituting a violation through preventable morbidity and mortality. However, implementation remains aspirational, as resource constraints in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) limit universal fulfillment, raising questions about enforceability versus economic feasibility. Globally, approximately 5 billion people—over two-thirds of the world's —lack safe, timely, and affordable surgical and care, contributing to an estimated 18 million surgical deaths annually from untreated conditions. This disparity exacerbates concerns, including inequalities based on , , , and ; for instance, women in LMICs face higher maternal mortality from unmet cesarean needs, while racial minorities in high-income settings, such as Black patients undergoing , experience 17-26% higher odds of postoperative mortality and complications compared to White patients, potentially linked to systemic access barriers. The (WHO) advocates integrating essential surgery into universal health coverage to mitigate these gaps, yet progress is uneven, with only 6% of surgical procedures occurring in the poorest countries despite their bearing 33% of the surgical disease burden. In resource-scarce scenarios, such as pandemics or conflicts, allocation decisions invoke ethical principles of , beneficence, non-maleficence, and , prioritizing maximal benefit (e.g., saving most lives or life-years) over egalitarian distribution or social worth criteria like age, , or past resource use. During the crisis, surgical frameworks emphasized utilitarian metrics—such as likelihood of survival and resource reciprocity—while rejecting discrimination based on comorbidities or socioeconomic status, though surveys reveal public preferences favoring younger patients and those with dependents, highlighting tensions between equity and efficiency. exemplifies these dilemmas: U.S. policies allocate livers and kidneys via waitlists prioritizing medical urgency and biological match over demographics, but critics note implicit biases in listing practices that disadvantage minorities. Humanitarian contexts, including war zones, underscore allocation challenges under , where the International Committee of the Red Cross prioritizes impartiality in distributing limited surgical capacity, yet field reports document favoring combatants over civilians due to logistical constraints. Patient-centered studies indicate support for principles like and treatment efficacy in scarce resource decisions, but implementation varies, with LMICs relying on ad-hoc amid workforce shortages (e.g., only 4 surgeons per 100,000 in versus 50 in high-income nations). While advocacy pushes for equity-focused reforms, empirical evidence suggests that without addressing causal factors like deficits and training gaps, such claims risk overpromising without causal mechanisms for delivery, potentially diverting resources from proven interventions.

Controversies and Criticisms

Overtreatment and Unnecessary Interventions

Overtreatment in surgery involves performing procedures lacking sufficient evidence of net benefit, where risks and costs outweigh potential gains, or where conservative management suffices. Estimates indicate that unnecessary medical care, including surgical interventions, constitutes over 20% of overall healthcare delivery , encompassing about 10% of procedures. Peer-reviewed analyses highlight that physician uncertainty about procedural efficacy contributes significantly, often leading to interventions without robust randomized support. A prominent example is arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative knee osteoarthritis or meniscal tears in middle-aged or older patients, performed over 700,000 times annually in the U.S. despite evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials showing no superiority over or in relief or function at 2-5 years follow-up. Similarly, for chronic nonspecific has surged, with U.S. rates doubling from 1990 to 2000s, yet systematic reviews demonstrate no long-term advantage over intensive rehabilitation or , with complication rates up to 20-30% including adjacent segment disease. Financial incentives in models drive much of this, as surgeons and facilities receive payments per procedure, encouraging volume over value; for instance, bundled payments or global budgets in pilot programs like Maryland's have reduced overuse by aligning reimbursements with outcomes rather than interventions. Defensive practices, fueled by fears (cited by 85% of surveyed physicians), and patient demands for "quick fixes" exacerbate the issue, though randomized evidence increasingly favors or non-invasive alternatives. Consequences include iatrogenic harm, such as surgical site infections (2-5% risk per procedure), prolonged recovery, and billions in avoidable costs—e.g., unnecessary arthroscopies alone exceed $3 billion yearly in the U.S. Initiatives like Choosing Wisely campaigns and mandatory second opinions for high-risk procedures aim to curb this, with studies showing 20-30% reductions in targeted low-value surgeries when guidelines are enforced. However, adoption lags due to entrenched training biases toward interventionism and variable guideline adherence.

Safety Failures and Iatrogenic Harm

Surgical procedures carry inherent risks of iatrogenic harm, defined as adverse outcomes directly attributable to the intervention rather than the underlying , including errors, infections, and complications that lead to prolonged morbidity, additional treatments, or . Globally, approximately 4.2 million patients die within 30 days postoperatively each year, accounting for 7.7% of all deaths and representing a substantial burden, with half of these occurring in low- and middle-income countries where resource limitations exacerbate risks.33139-8/fulltext) , preventable harm affects an estimated 400,000 hospitalized patients annually, with surgical adverse events contributing significantly due to factors such as , procedural complexity, and systemic lapses in protocols. Never events—serious, preventable errors deemed wholly avoidable with existing standards—underscore systemic safety failures in surgery. In the US, over 4,000 surgical never events occur yearly, including wrong-site surgeries (WSS), wrong-procedure events, and wrong-patient operations, often resulting in additional surgeries (67.6% of cases in one analysis) or death. From 2007 to 2017, California hospitals reported 142 serious surgical errors, with retained foreign objects (e.g., surgical sponges or instruments) estimated at 1,500 incidents annually nationwide, frequently undetected intraoperatively due to visualization failures or counting errors affecting 88.6% of instrument-related mishaps. Wrong-site surgeries alone totaled 2,447 cases over two decades in US databases, highlighting persistent vulnerabilities despite checklists like the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, as underreporting via voluntary systems masks true incidence. Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a leading cause of iatrogenic harm, complicating 2.5% of procedures globally based on pooled meta-analyses, though rates reach 11% in low-resource settings and 11% cumulatively within 30 days for general surgeries. In high-income contexts like the , CDC surveillance estimates 110,800 SSIs annually, often linked to inadequate sterilization, prolonged operative times, or factors, prolonging stays by a of 7-11 days and increasing reoperation needs. These infections contribute to 10% of all preventable harm in healthcare, with trauma-related SSIs varying from 2.5% to 41.9% depending on severity. Postoperative complications extend beyond acute errors, with adverse event rates of 25-33% in sampled hospitals and iatrogenic contributions to 17.4% of injuries or 0.11% of injuries across large cohorts. One-year mortality post-major surgery reaches 13.4% in community-dwelling adults, driven by complications like vascular injuries (20% in-hospital mortality) or iatrogenic wounds necessitating implant removal and repeat interventions. These outcomes reflect causal chains from intraoperative lapses—such as mishaps or errors (17% rate in operating rooms)—to postoperative oversight, with studies indicating resistance to reduction efforts and calls for enhanced visualization technologies and mandatory reporting to mitigate underestimation.

Debates on Cosmetic and Elective Procedures

Cosmetic and elective procedures, distinct from medically necessary surgeries, involve interventions aimed at enhancing appearance or function without addressing underlying , sparking debates over their ethical justification, psychological efficacy, and risk-benefit profiles. Proponents argue that such procedures uphold patient autonomy and can yield subjective improvements in , yet critics contend they often prioritize commercial interests over evidence-based outcomes, with systematic reviews indicating limited long-term benefits and potential exacerbation of disturbances. A central contention revolves around psychological screening and the prevalence of (BDD) among candidates, estimated at 7-15% in cosmetic surgery seekers, where perceived defects are minimal or absent but cause severe distress. Evidence from longitudinal studies shows that while some patients report transient satisfaction post-procedure, BDD symptoms frequently persist or worsen, with no sustained reduction in severity observed in up to 76% of cases following interventions like ; surgery is thus deemed contraindicated by major guidelines, as it fails to address the disorder's cognitive roots and may reinforce maladaptive behaviors. Screening tools, such as self-report questionnaires, are advocated to identify at-risk individuals, though implementation varies, raising concerns about inadequate preoperative psychiatric evaluation in profit-driven settings. Complication rates underscore risks disproportionate to non-therapeutic aims, with systematic reviews reporting overall adverse events in 3-42% of cases depending on procedure type; for instance, yields contour irregularities in 3-9% and infections in up to 1.34%, while broader audits reveal presentations in 24% of ambulatory cases. Cosmetic amplifies these dangers through substandard facilities and follow-up, contributing to infective complications and revision burdens on domestic systems. Ethical analyses emphasize non-maleficence, questioning whether surgeons should proceed when empirical show minor procedures like biopsies can still precipitate harm, and industry practices—such as employing minimally trained providers—have led to disfiguring outcomes and litigation. Societal pressures, amplified by media and , fuel debates on versus inducement, with women citing external expectations as drivers for procedures amid a $26 billion U.S. market in 2023, yet links elective surgery seekers to higher rates of adverse childhood experiences and untreated issues, suggesting interventions may mask rather than resolve deeper causal factors. Regulatory gaps persist, as aesthetic surgery's elective status evades stringent oversight compared to reconstructive work, prompting calls for mandatory ethical frameworks balancing beneficence with realism about unproven long-term gains.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/surgical-specialties
  2. https://www.facs.org/for-patients/surgery-faq/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2871217/
  4. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1202392
  5. https://www.worldwidecancerresearch.org/cancer-and-cancer-research-explained/discovery-research/7-incredible-medical-breakthroughs-that-changed-the-world/
  6. https://www.brighamandwomens.org/surgery/history-and-milestones
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10498843/
  8. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/education/online-guide-to-choosing-a-surgical-residency/guide-to-choosing-a-surgical-residency-for-medical-students/faqs/specialties/
  9. https://www.surgical.theclinics.com/article/S0039-6109%2821%2900081-5/fulltext
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3113170/
  11. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/surgery
  12. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/surgery?uri=%252FAMADoc%252FHOD.xml-0-4317.xml
  13. https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/special-subjects/surgery/surgery
  14. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/education/programs/so-you-want-to-be-a-surgeon/section-iii-surgical-specialties/general-surgery/
  15. https://consensus.app/questions/surgery-definition-in-medical-literature/
  16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK518795/
  17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK333506/
  18. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/types-of-surgery
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11487739/
  20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29331398/
  21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK613066/
  22. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/having-surgery/types-of-surgery/
  23. https://stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-treatments/g/general-surgery/types.html
  24. https://oakbendmedcenter.org/different-types-of-surgery/
  25. https://driscollchildrens.org/faq/what-are-the-different-types-of-surgery/
  26. https://www.absurgery.org/check-a-certification/specialty-definitions/
  27. https://www.etymonline.com/word/surgery
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8377927/
  29. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA%2A/Chirurgia.html
  30. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/surgery
  31. https://globalrph.com/medical-terminology-for-surgeons/
  32. https://www.honorhealth.com/patients-visitors/average-pricing/medical-glossary
  33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK333518/box/ch02.sec3.box1/?report=objectonly
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3662871/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8178080/
  36. https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:970547/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19046097/
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5826594/
  39. https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-practice-parameters/basic-standards-for-preanesthesia-care
  40. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2013/0315/p414.html
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11112836/
  42. https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-practice-parameters/statement-on-asa-physical-status-classification-system
  43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441940/
  44. https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/1739/revised-cardiac-risk-index-pre-operative-risk
  45. https://riskcalculator.facs.org/
  46. https://emcrit.org/ibcc/preoperative/
  47. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2802799
  48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430827/
  49. https://www.aorn.org/article/important-considerations-when-obtaining-informed-consent
  50. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/special-subjects/care-of-the-surgical-patient/preoperative-evaluation
  51. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2000/0715/p387.html
  52. https://nurseslabs.com/intraoperative-phase/
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491077/
  54. https://openstax.org/books/fundamentals-nursing/pages/31-3-intraoperative-phase
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6368165/
  56. https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.15501
  57. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/neuromonitoring-in-surgery-and-anesthesia
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11069062/
  59. https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/111/1/znad361/7503531
  60. https://mmcts.org/tutorial/1690
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001209210008689
  62. https://pure.johnshopkins.edu/en/publications/systematic-review-of-intraoperative-assessment-tools-in-minimally
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750301/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10654132/
  65. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2820097
  66. https://erassociety.org/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9494880/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3526756/
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8571843/
  70. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/special-subjects/care-of-the-surgical-patient/postoperative-care
  71. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/integrated-health-services-%28ihs%29/csy/surgical-care/imeesc-toolkit/best-practice-safety-protocols/post-operative-care.pdf?sfvrsn=814e0c4f_5
  72. https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196%2820%2930262-7/fulltext
  73. https://wjes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13017-023-00519-2
  74. https://www.stritch.luc.edu/lumen/meded/surgery/postoperativecare.pdf
  75. https://www.asahq.org/about-asa/governance-and-committees/asa-committees/environmental-sustainability/greening-the-operating-room/perioperative-and-or-design
  76. https://www.definitivehc.com/blog/how-many-ascs-are-in-the-us
  77. https://www.ascassociation.org/surgery-centers
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5972753/
  79. https://www.aorn.org/article/aorn-guideline-in-focus--sterile-technique-in-the-or
  80. https://www.ashrae.org/file%2520library/technical%2520resources/covid-19/14-26_khankari.pdf
  81. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/the-surgical-team
  82. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content?contenttypeid=85&contentid=P01413
  83. https://medschoolinsiders.com/medical-student/meet-the-surgical-team/
  84. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/patient-safety/9789241598590-eng-checklist.pdf
  85. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa0810119
  86. https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/posts/2025/2025-08-21-amulatory-surgery-centers-deliver-faster-care.html
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10310578/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12067821/
  89. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/where-are-essential-surgeries-being-performed-and-monitored--a-g
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8695837/
  91. https://www.isaps.org/discover/about-isaps/global-statistics/global-survey-2023-full-report-and-press-releases/
  92. https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/research/safe-surgery
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352556820301466
  94. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanam/article/PIIS2667-193X%2824%2900189-3/fulltext
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10504717/
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1360123/
  97. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58161-2
  98. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/health-services/articles/10.3389/frhs.2024.1353788/full
  99. https://gh.bmj.com/content/3/3/e000810
  100. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2625129
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091222003208
  102. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2797666
  103. https://www.apsf.org/patient-guide/what-are-risk-factors-for-surgery/
  104. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/qi-resources/strong-for-surgery/
  105. https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/study-reveals-key-factors-influencing-surgical-complications-and-patient-outcomes.pdf
  106. https://perioperativemedicinejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13741-019-0115-1
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11258843/
  108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11948273/
  109. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-15275-7
  110. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.18772
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4069246/
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10826254/
  113. https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/factors-influencing-surgical-outcomes-a-retrospective-analysis-of-patientrelated-surgeonrelated-and-systemrelated-variab.pdf
  114. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29325962/
  115. https://janesthanalgcritcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s44158-022-00057-4
  116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091221007297
  117. https://www.absurgery.org/get-certified/pediatric-surgery/
  118. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/family-life/health-management/pediatric-specialists/Pages/what-is-a-pediatric-surgeon.aspx
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6806866/
  120. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35926308/
  121. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/all-childrens-hospital/services/pediatric-general-surgery/procedures
  122. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK587398/
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7891905/
  124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055858623000938
  125. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/1671777
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022346818304032
  127. https://eurjmedres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40001-023-01613-6
  128. https://www.pedsurglibrary.com/apsa/view/Pediatric-Surgery-NaT/829734/all/History_of_Pediatric_Surgery
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2500244/
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11436438/
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9594523/
  132. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2018/0815/p214.html
  133. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306308
  134. https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-025-06222-y
  135. https://ales.amegroups.org/article/view/5712/html
  136. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2769587
  137. https://news.yale.edu/2022/10/19/frailty-dementia-raise-mortality-risk-older-americans-after-surgery-0
  138. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2801764
  139. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.26.20239228.full
  140. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijgo.15877
  141. https://www.ccjm.org/content/88/1/27
  142. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002961021002312
  143. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31653246/
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6822954/
  145. https://www.openanesthesia.org/keywords/nonobstetric-surgery-in-pregnancy/
  146. https://www.bjaed.org/article/S2058-5349%2822%2900160-3/fulltext
  147. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2019/04/nonobstetric-surgery-during-pregnancy
  148. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37329286/
  149. https://pssjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13037-019-0213-5
  150. https://www.bjaed.org/article/S1743-1816%2817%2930116-6/fulltext
  151. https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/cc4928
  152. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24945077/
  153. https://www.bjanaesthesia.org.uk/article/S0007-0912%2824%2900610-X/fulltext
  154. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12630-021-02114-y
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10375505/
  156. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3876527/
  157. https://www.nature.com/articles/387360a0.pdf
  158. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12717541/
  159. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2989268/
  160. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4263393/
  161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11000756/
  162. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11415114/
  163. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21452005/
  164. https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=lnq
  165. https://columbiasurgery.org/news/2015/07/15/history-medicine-islams-golden-surgeon-1
  166. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31714293/
  167. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890509620306038
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7384400/
  169. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890509606605931
  170. https://www.facs.org/about-acs/governance/board-of-governors/resources/facts-de-chauliac/
  171. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39983988/
  172. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025001664
  173. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2605308/
  174. https://thejns.org/focus/view/journals/neurosurg-focus/53/3/article-pE2.xml
  175. https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=bjur
  176. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15910710/
  177. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1514468/
  178. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11459598/
  179. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28005119/
  180. https://www.aorn.org/article/20th-century--making-major-medical-advances
  181. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1990/murray/facts/
  182. https://hms.harvard.edu/about-hms/history-hms/timeline-discovery
  183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1856601/
  184. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4920664/
  185. https://history.mayoclinic.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ETHERD1.pdf
  186. https://www.woodlibrarymuseum.org/history-of-anesthesia/
  187. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/10/13/557367840/the-butchering-art-how-a-19th-century-physician-made-surgery-safer
  188. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9854334/
  189. https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/listers-antisepsis-system
  190. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/lord-lister-father-of-antiseptic-surgery-2
  191. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsnr.2013.0028
  192. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4530413/
  193. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18250929/
  194. https://www.news-medical.net/life-sciences/History-of-Asepsis.aspx
  195. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326302086_Antisepsis_and_Asepsis_and_How_They_Shaped_Modern_Surgery
  196. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1092361
  197. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4589904/
  198. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.799442/full
  199. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12279690/
  200. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10683436/
  201. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784205/
  202. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/390426
  203. https://www.nature.com/articles/aps2017182
  204. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6230860/
  205. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809924007379
  206. https://blog.caixaresearch.org/en/the-challenges-and-advances-in-organ-transplantation-a-longer-and-better-life-for-patients/
  207. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7032584/
  208. https://medicalfuturist.com/the-technological-future-of-surgery/
  209. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039610905702309
  210. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/education/online-guide-to-choosing-a-surgical-residency/guide-to-choosing-a-surgical-residency-for-medical-students/faqs/training/
  211. https://www.absurgery.org/get-certified/general-surgery/training-requirements/
  212. https://residency.wustl.edu/choosing-a-specialty/specialty-descriptions/general-surgery/
  213. https://www.nrmp.org/match-data/2024/06/results-and-data-2024-main-residency-match/
  214. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publications/news-and-articles/bulletin/2024/june-2024-volume-109-issue-6/trends-for-2024-match-reveal-more-applicants-interested-in-surgery/
  215. https://www.absurgery.org/get-certified/complex-general-surgical-oncology/training-requirements/
  216. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/2025-reformatted-requirements/442_surgicalcriticalcare_2025_reformatted.pdf
  217. https://www.quora.com/How-many-years-is-a-surgical-fellowship
  218. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7397354/
  219. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353258713_Variation_in_training_requirements_within_general_surgery_comparison_of_23_countries_on_behalf_of_the_Global_Surgical_Training_Requirements_Project_Collaborators
  220. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12400461/
  221. https://clinicalsurgeryjournal.com/article/1000014/addressing-the-surgical-shortage-revisiting-residency-training-requirements-for-international-medical-graduates
  222. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11224887/
  223. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24827930/
  224. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-024-06299-w
  225. https://www.upsurgeon.com/scientific-news/types-of-surgical-simulation-sharpening-surgical-skills/
  226. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37962178/
  227. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32398408/
  228. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8052560/
  229. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8035110/
  230. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11558898/
  231. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37799263/
  232. https://www.absurgery.org/get-certified/
  233. https://www.absurgery.org/get-certified/general-surgery/
  234. https://www.absurgery.org/get-certified/certification-process/international-applicants/
  235. https://www.absurgery.org/
  236. https://www.absurgery.org/stay-certified/
  237. https://www.absurgery.org/stay-certified/continuous-certification-assessments/
  238. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/education/tools-and-platforms/mycme/cme-state-requirements/
  239. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/education/tools-and-platforms/mycme/find-cme-opportunities/
  240. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4571522/
  241. https://uroweb.org/training/sise-standardisation-in-surgical-education
  242. https://www.facs.org/for-patients/preparing-for-surgery/qualifications/
  243. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10445506/
  244. https://isrg.intuitive.com/news-releases/news-release-details/meta-analysis-published-annals-surgery-shows-benefits-da-vinci
  245. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8714650/
  246. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0141076820967918
  247. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10569391/
  248. https://ales.amegroups.org/article/view/10686/html
  249. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12181090/
  250. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2815665
  251. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/robotic-assisted-surgery-better/2023-08
  252. https://www.jmaj.jp/detail.php?id=10.31662%252Fjmaj.2024-0169
  253. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12320852/
  254. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1393898/full
  255. https://ccts.amegroups.org/article/view/104736/html
  256. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12538659/
  257. https://www.cureus.com/articles/407907-ai-enhanced-surgical-decision-making-in-orthopedics-from-preoperative-planning-to-intraoperative-guidance-and-real-time-adaptation
  258. https://jmai.amegroups.org/article/view/9200/html
  259. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/artificial-intelligence-enabling-big-advances-surgery
  260. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8173379/
  261. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/12/1557
  262. https://journals.lww.com/annals-of-medicine-and-surgery/fulltext/2025/04000/artificial_intelligence_in_surgical_medicine__a.49.aspx
  263. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-025-01543-z
  264. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000132
  265. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12084850/
  266. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11351679/
  267. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40166527/
  268. https://www.jebms.org/full-text/168
  269. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pat.70324
  270. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12602-1
  271. https://mayomagazine.mayoclinic.org/2025/05/transplant-medicine-innovations/
  272. https://www.organdonationalliance.org/insight/keeping-up-with-technical-innovations-in-organ-transplantation-perfusion-and-preservation-technology-part-1/
  273. https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/en/about/newsroom/press-releases/mgh-performs-second-xenotransplant-of-genetically-edited-pig-kidney-into-living-recipient
  274. https://www.kidneyfund.org/article/fda-greenlights-first-clinical-trials-genetically-modified-pig-kidney-transplants-humans
  275. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12415073/
  276. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12391572/
  277. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3894924/
  278. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/education/advanced-trauma-operative-management/
  279. https://www.facs.org/media/mkbnhqtw/ortho_guidelines.pdf
  280. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publications/news-and-articles/bulletin/2025/june-2025-volume-110-issue-6/surgeons-rethink-abdominal-trauma-playbook/
  281. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/education/advanced-surgical-skills-for-exposure-in-trauma/
  282. https://www.facs.org/media/p0nfw0n0/hrsa-mtspe.pdf
  283. https://www.capitolcardiology.com/heart-bypass-surgery-success-rates-risks-and-what-to-expect
  284. https://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975%2823%2900008-5/fulltext
  285. https://consultqd.clevelandclinic.org/cardiothoracic-surgical-outcomes-what-steady-improvements-add-up-to-over-time
  286. https://advances.massgeneral.org/neuro/journal.aspx?id=1064
  287. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10957582/
  288. https://aaos-annualmeeting-presskit.org/2023/research-news/fact-sheet-orthopaedic-surgeons-will-need-to-double-total-joint-arthroplasty-caseload-to-meet-demand-by-2050/
  289. https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1511
  290. https://www.cedars-sinai.org/programs/urology/specialties.html
  291. https://allianceurology.com/common-urology-procedures/
  292. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11380141/
  293. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10674717/
  294. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40731766/
  295. https://www.isuog.org/events/isuog-world-congress-2025/scientific-program/topics/developments-fetal-surgery.html
  296. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11836749/
  297. https://health.ucdavis.edu/news/headlines/novel-surgery-gives-lymphedema-patients-new-hope/2024/12
  298. https://tbcr.amegroups.org/article/view/95533/html
  299. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/23283-endovascular-surgery
  300. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11818796/
  301. https://utswmed.org/conditions-treatments/endovascular-procedures/
  302. https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/what-is-fetal-surgery
  303. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5891649/
  304. https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/how-do-healthcare-prices-and-use-in-the-u-s-compare-to-other-countries/
  305. https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/health-policy-101-international-comparison-of-health-systems/
  306. https://www.resolvemedicalbills.com/blog/the-10-most-expensive-medical-procedures-in-the-us-in-2024
  307. https://www.weisspaarz.com/the-true-cost-of-medical-procedures-in-each-state/
  308. https://www.talktomira.com/post/how-much-does-surgery-cost-without-insurance
  309. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960160-X/fulltext?dgcid=recommender_referral_trendmd
  310. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174391912100090X
  311. https://gh.bmj.com/content/9/10/e016439
  312. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2023/oct/high-us-health-care-spending-where-is-it-all-going
  313. https://www.axaglobalhealthcare.com/en/wellbeing/global-access/rising-costs-of-global-healthcare/
  314. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32861440/
  315. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11981160/
  316. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK343623/table/part3.ch13.sec4.table1/
  317. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MED.SAOP.P5
  318. https://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/10.5334/aogh.4251
  319. https://www.thelancet.com/commissions-do/global-surgery
  320. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/surgeons-per-100000
  321. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10306037/
  322. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34600123/
  323. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10519815251353764
  324. https://josr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13018-024-04988-2
  325. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11568489/
  326. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8604782/
  327. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10926-025-10331-1
  328. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/2839387
  329. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hec.4838
  330. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38733282/
  331. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2214-109X%2815%2970088-4/fulltext
  332. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/1/e076293
  333. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/10/surgery-for-all/
  334. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11534226/
  335. http://depts.washington.edu/bhdept/ethics-medicine/bioethics-topics/articles/informed-consent
  336. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5373748/
  337. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/informed-consent/
  338. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7079202/
  339. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521420318723
  340. https://pssjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13037-022-00342-9
  341. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/faq/informed-consent/index.html
  342. https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/books/lbb/x268.htm
  343. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4008301/
  344. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7864709/
  345. https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-024-01128-7
  346. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/never-events
  347. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592394/
  348. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26061125/
  349. https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/publications/management_briefs/default.cfm?ManagementBriefsMenu=eBrief-no75&eBriefTitle=Prevention%2Bof%2BWrong-Site%2BSurgery%252C%2BRetained%2BSurgical%2BItems%252C%2Band%2BSurgical%2BFires
  350. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publications/news-and-articles/bulletin/2024/julyaugust-2024-volume-109-issue-7/wrong-surgery-retention-of-foreign-object-top-2023-sentinel-event-list/
  351. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/policy-research-perspective-medical-liability-claim-frequency.pdf
  352. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-81058-x
  353. https://journals.lww.com/jaaos/fulltext/2023/08150/effect_of_lawsuits_on_professional_well_being_and.6.aspx
  354. https://www.pstriallaw.com/legal-news/surgical-errors-statistics
  355. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2628515/
  356. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6606555/
  357. https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1725/
  358. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167629622000571
  359. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20930260/
  360. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919120305999
  361. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32828980/
  362. https://hms.harvard.edu/news/global-surgery-bold-plan-access-equity
  363. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-022-00695-6
  364. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216853/
  365. https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/allocating-limited-health-care-resources
  366. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/professionals/by-topic/ethical-considerations/ethical-principles-in-the-allocation-of-human-organs/
  367. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539108/full
  368. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11429350/
  369. https://www.globalchildrenssurgery.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/HumanRightsInGlobalSurgery.pdf
  370. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2662877
  371. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1065571/
  372. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/2018/02/common-knee-operation-in-elderly-constitutes-low-value-care-new-study-concludes
  373. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28665174/
  374. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5333707/
  375. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2729142/
  376. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0181970
  377. https://www.statnews.com/2022/09/19/surgeons-payment-model-incentives/
  378. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5587107/
  379. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7747436/
  380. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109920306415
  381. https://pssjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13037-016-0117-6
  382. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8889848/
  383. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499956/
  384. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23257079/
  385. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779420
  386. https://bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12893-024-02407-1
  387. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10443983/
  388. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36964747/
  389. https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/infection-prevention-control/surgical-site-infection
  390. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf
  391. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety
  392. https://www.jtraumainj.org/journal/view.php?number=1360
  393. https://www.bmj.com/content/387/bmj.q2437.full.pdf
  394. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11409518/
  395. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27181242/
  396. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38641255/
  397. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392393034_The_Limits_of_Human-Based_Informatics_Documentation_Error_Rates_in_the_Electronic_Health_Record_in_the_Operating_Room
  398. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38568127/
  399. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890136/
  400. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525001810
  401. https://www.med.upenn.edu/ctsa/assets/user-content/documents/CrerandFranklin_BDD_2006.pdf
  402. https://bdd.iocdf.org/expert-opinions/cosmetic-treatments-and-bdd/
  403. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5986110/
  404. https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/33/1/152/210103
  405. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4728899/
  406. https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/44/7/NP454/7639008
  407. https://academic.oup.com/asjopenforum/article/doi/10.1093/asjof/ojad107/7453295
  408. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144524000238
  409. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587825000543
  410. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5109381/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.