Hubbry Logo
CerealCerealMain
Open search
Cereal
Community hub
Cereal
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cereal
Cereal
Cereal
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Harvesting a cereal with a combine harvester accompanied by a tractor and trailer.
Cereal grains: (top) pearl millet, rice, barley
(middle) sorghum, maize, oats
(bottom) millet, wheat, rye, triticale

A cereal is a grass cultivated for its edible grain. Cereals are the world's largest crops, and are therefore staple foods. They include rice, wheat, rye, oats, barley, millet, and maize (corn). Edible grains from other plant families, such as amaranth, buckwheat and quinoa, are pseudocereals. Most cereals are annuals, producing one crop from each planting, though rice is sometimes grown as a perennial. Winter varieties are hardy enough to be planted in the autumn, becoming dormant in the winter, and harvested in spring or early summer; spring varieties are planted in spring and harvested in late summer. The term cereal is derived from the name of the Roman goddess of grain crops and fertility, Ceres.

Cereals were domesticated in the Neolithic around 8,000 years ago. Wheat and barley were domesticated in the Fertile Crescent. Rice and some millets were domesticated in East Asia, while sorghum and other millets were domesticated in West Africa. Maize was domesticated by Indigenous peoples of the Americas in southern Mexico about 9,000 years ago. In the 20th century, cereal productivity was greatly increased by the Green Revolution. This increase in production has accompanied a growing international trade, with some countries producing large portions of the cereal supply for other countries.

Cereals provide food eaten directly as whole grains, usually cooked, or they are ground to flour and made into bread, porridge, and other products. Cereals have a high starch content, enabling them to be fermented into alcoholic drinks such as beer. Cereal farming has a substantial environmental impact, and is often produced in high-intensity monocultures. The environmental harms can be mitigated by sustainable practices which reduce the impact on soil and improve biodiversity, such as no-till farming and intercropping.

History

[edit]

Origins

[edit]
Further information: Neolithic Revolution and Domestication
Threshing of grain in ancient Egypt

Wheat, barley, rye, and oats were gathered and eaten in the Fertile Crescent during the early Neolithic. Cereal grains 19,000 years old have been found at the Ohalo II site in Israel, with charred remnants of wild wheat and barley.[1]

During the same period, farmers in China began to farm rice and millet, using human-made floods and fires as part of their cultivation regimen.[2][3] The use of soil conditioners, including manure, fish, compost and ashes, appears to have begun early, and developed independently in areas of the world including Mesopotamia, the Nile Valley, and Eastern Asia.[4]

Cereals that became modern barley and wheat were domesticated some 8,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent.[5] Millets and rice were domesticated in East Asia, while sorghum and other millets were domesticated in sub-Saharan West Africa, primarily as feed for livestock.[6] Maize arose from a single domestication in Mesoamerica about 9,000 years ago.[7]

Roman harvesting machine

In these agricultural regions, religion was often shaped by the divinity associated with the grain and harvests. In the Mesopotamian creation myth, an era of civilization is inaugurated by the grain goddess Ashnan.[8] The Roman goddess Ceres presided over agriculture, grain crops, fertility, and motherhood;[9] the term cereal is derived from Latin cerealis, "of grain", originally meaning "of [the goddess] Ceres".[10] Several gods of antiquity combined agriculture and war: the Hittite Sun goddess of Arinna, the Canaanite Lahmu and the Roman Janus.[11]

Complex civilizations arose where cereal agriculture created a surplus, allowing for part of the harvest to be appropriated from farmers, allowing power to be concentrated in cities.[12]

Modern

[edit]
Further information: Green Revolution
Rice fields in India. India's participation in the Green Revolution helped resolve food shortages in the mid-twentieth century.[13][14]

During the second half of the 20th century, there was a significant increase in the production of high-yield cereal crops worldwide, especially wheat and rice, due to the Green Revolution, a technological change funded by development organizations.[15] The strategies developed by the Green Revolution included mechanized tilling, monoculture, nitrogen fertilizers, and breeding of new strains of seeds. These innovations focused on fending off starvation and increasing yield-per-plant, and were very successful in raising overall yields of cereal grains, but paid less attention to nutritional quality.[16] These modern high-yield cereal crops tend to have low-quality proteins, with essential amino acid deficiencies, are high in carbohydrates, and lack balanced essential fatty acids, vitamins, minerals and other quality factors.[16] So-called ancient grains and heirloom varieties have seen an increase in popularity with the "organic" movements of the early 21st century, but there is a tradeoff in yield-per-plant, putting pressure on resource-poor areas as food crops are replaced with cash crops.[17]

Biology

[edit]
Structure of a cereal, wheat. A: Plant; B ripe ear of grains; 1 spikelet before flowering; 2 the same, flowering and spread, enlarged; 3 flowers with glumes; 4 stamens 5 pollen; 6 and 7 ovaries with juice scales; 8 and 9 parts of the scar; 10 fruit husks; 11–14 grains, natural size and enlarged.

Cereals are grasses, in the Poaceae family, that produce edible grains. A cereal grain is botanically a caryopsis, a fruit where the seed coat is fused with the pericarp.[18][19] Grasses have stems that are hollow except at the nodes and narrow alternate leaves borne in two ranks.[20] The lower part of each leaf encloses the stem, forming a leaf-sheath. The leaf grows from the base of the blade, an adaptation that protects the growing meristem from grazing animals.[20][21] The flowers are usually hermaphroditic, with the exception of maize, and mainly anemophilous or wind-pollinated, although insects occasionally play a role.[20][22]

Among the best-known cereals are maize, rice, wheat, barley, sorghum, millet, oat, rye and triticale.[23] Some other grains are colloquially called cereals, even though they are not grasses; these pseudocereals include buckwheat, quinoa, and amaranth.[24]

Cultivation

[edit]

All cereal crops are cultivated in a similar way. Most are annual, so after sowing they are harvested just once.[25] An exception is rice, which although usually treated as an annual can survive as a perennial, producing a ratoon crop.[26] Cereals adapted to a temperate climate, such as barley, oats, rye, spelt, triticale, and wheat, are called cool-season cereals. Those preferring a tropical climate, such as millet and sorghum, are called warm-season cereals.[25][27][28] Cool-season cereals, especially rye, followed by barley, are hardy; they grow best in fairly cool weather, and stop growing, depending on variety, when the temperature goes above around 30 °C or 85 °F. Warm-season cereals, in contrast, require hot weather and cannot tolerate frost.[25] Cool-season cereals can be grown in highlands in the tropics, where they sometimes deliver several crops in a single year.[25]

Planting

[edit]
Newly planted rice in a paddy field

In the tropics, warm-season cereals can be grown at any time of the year. In temperate zones, these cereals can only be grown when there is no frost. Most cereals are planted in tilled soils, which reduces weeds and breaks up the surface of a field. Most cereals need regular water in the early part of their life cycle. Rice is commonly grown in flooded fields,[29] though some strains are grown on dry land.[30] Other warm climate cereals, such as sorghum, are adapted to arid conditions.[31]

Cool-season cereals are grown mainly in temperate zones. These cereals often have both winter varieties for autumn sowing, winter dormancy, and early summer harvesting, and spring varieties planted in spring and harvested in late summer. Winter varieties have the advantage of using water when it is plentiful, and permitting a second crop after the early harvest. They flower only in spring as they require vernalization, exposure to cold for a specific period, fixed genetically. Spring crops grow when it is warmer but less rainy, so they may need irrigation.[25]

Growth

[edit]
Fusarium graminearum damages many cereals, here wheat, where it causes wheat scab (right).

Cereal strains are bred for consistency and resilience to the local environmental conditions. The greatest constraints on yield are plant diseases, especially rusts (mostly the Puccinia spp.) and powdery mildews.[32] Fusarium head blight, caused by Fusarium graminearum, is a significant limitation on a wide variety of cereals.[33] Other pressures include pest insects and wildlife like rodents and deer.[34][35] In conventional agriculture, some farmers apply fungicides or pesticides.

Harvesting

[edit]

Annual cereals die when they have come to seed, and dry up. Harvesting begins once the plants and seeds are dry enough. Harvesting in mechanized agricultural systems is by combine harvester, a machine which drives across the field in a single pass in which it cuts the stalks and then threshes and winnows the grain.[25][36] In traditional agricultural systems, mostly in the Global South, harvesting may be by hand, using tools such as scythes and grain cradles.[25] Leftover parts of the plant can be allowed to decompose, or collected as straw; this can be used for animal bedding, mulch, and a growing medium for mushrooms.[37] It is used in crafts such as building with cob or straw-bale construction.[38]

Preprocessing and storage

[edit]

If cereals are not completely dry when harvested, such as when the weather is rainy, the stored grain will be spoilt by mould fungi such as Aspergillus and Penicillium.[25][39] This can be prevented by drying it artificially. It may then be stored in a grain elevator or silo, to be sold later. Grain stores need to be constructed to protect the grain from damage by pests such as seed-eating birds and rodents.[25]

Processing

[edit]
An indigenous Mexican woman prepares maize tortillas, 2013

When the cereal is ready to be distributed, it is sold to a manufacturing facility that first removes the outer layers of the grain for subsequent milling for flour or other processing steps, to produce foods such as flour, oatmeal, or pearl barley.[40] In developing countries, processing may be traditional, in artisanal workshops, as with tortilla production in Central America.[41]

Most cereals can be processed in a variety of ways. Rice processing, for instance, can create whole-grain or polished rice, or rice flour. Removal of the germ increases the longevity of grain in storage.[42] Some grains can be malted, a process of activating enzymes in the seed to cause sprouting that turns the complex starches into sugars before drying.[43][44] These sugars can be extracted for industrial uses and further processing, such as for making industrial alcohol,[45] beer,[46] whisky,[47] or rice wine,[48] or sold directly as a sugar.[49] In the 20th century, industrial processes developed around chemically altering the grain, to be used for other processes. In particular, maize can be altered to produce food additives, such as corn starch[50] and high-fructose corn syrup.[51]

Effects on the environment

[edit]

Impacts

[edit]
Further information: Environmental impact of agriculture
Harvesting kernza, a perennial cereal developed in the 21st century. Because it grows back every year, farmers no longer have to till the soil.

Cereal production has a substantial impact on the environment. Tillage can lead to soil erosion and increased runoff.[52] Irrigation consumes large quantities of water; its extraction from lakes, rivers, or aquifers may have multiple environmental effects, such as lowering the water table and cause salination of aquifers.[53] Fertilizer production contributes to global warming,[54] and its use can lead to pollution and eutrophication of waterways.[55] Arable farming uses large amounts of fossil fuel, releasing greenhouse gases which contribute to global warming.[56] Pesticide usage can cause harm to wildlife, such as to bees.[57]

Mitigations

[edit]
Further information: Sustainable agriculture
Excellent soil structure in land in South Dakota with no-till farming using a crop rotation of maize, soybeans, and wheat accompanied by cover crops. The main crop has been harvested but the roots of the cover crop are still visible in autumn.

Some of the impacts of growing cereals can be mitigated by changing production practices. Tillage can be reduced by no-till farming, such as by direct drilling of cereal seeds, or by developing and planting perennial crop varieties so that annual tilling is not required. Rice can be grown as a ratoon crop;[26] and other researchers are exploring perennial cool-season cereals, such as kernza, being developed in the US.[58]

Fertilizer and pesticide usage may be reduced in some polycultures, growing several crops in a single field at the same time.[59] Fossil fuel-based nitrogen fertilizer usage can be reduced by intercropping cereals with legumes which fix nitrogen.[60] Greenhouse gas emissions may be cut further by more efficient irrigation or by water harvesting methods like contour trenching that reduce the need for irrigation, and by breeding new crop varieties.[61]

Uses

[edit]

Direct consumption

[edit]

Some cereals such as rice require little preparation before human consumption. For example, to make plain cooked rice, raw milled rice is washed and boiled.[62] Foods such as porridge[63] and muesli may be made largely of whole cereals, especially oats, whereas commercial breakfast cereals such as granola may be highly processed and combined with sugars, oils, and other products.[64]

Flour-based foods

[edit]
Main article: Flour
Various cereals and their products

Cereals can be ground to make flour. Wheat flour is the main ingredient of bread and pasta.[65][66][67] Maize flour has been important in Mesoamerica since ancient times, with foods such as Mexican tortillas and tamales.[68] Rye flour is a constituent of bread in central and northern Europe,[69] while rice flour is common in Asia.[70]

A cereal grain consists of starchy endosperm, germ, and bran. Wholemeal flour contains all of these; white flour is without some or all of the germ or bran.[71][72]

Alcohol

[edit]
Further information: Beer and Ethanol fermentation

Because cereals have a high starch content, they are often used to make industrial alcohol[45] and alcoholic drinks by fermentation. For instance, beer is produced by brewing and fermenting starch, mainly from cereal grains—most commonly malted barley.[46] Rice wines such as Japanese sake are brewed in Asia;[73] a fermented rice and honey wine was made in China some 9,000 years ago.[48]

Animal feed

[edit]
Further information: Animal feed
Chickens eating cereal-rich feed[74]

Cereals and their related byproducts such as hay are routinely fed to farm animals. Common cereals as animal food include maize, barley, wheat, and oats. Moist grains may be treated chemically or made into silage; mechanically flattened or crimped, and kept in airtight storage until used; or stored dry with a moisture content of less than 14%.[75] Commercially, grains are often combined with other materials and formed into feed pellets.[76]

Nutrition

[edit]

Whole-grain and processed

[edit]
Whole grains as used in this bread have more of the original seed, making them more nutritious but more prone to spoilage in storage.[77]

As whole grains, cereals provide carbohydrates, polyunsaturated fats, protein, vitamins, and minerals. When processed by the removal of the bran and germ, all that remains is the starchy endosperm.[71] In some developing countries, cereals constitute a majority of daily sustenance. In developed countries, cereal consumption is moderate and varied but still substantial, primarily in the form of refined and processed grains.[78]

Amino acid balance

[edit]
Further information: Complete protein and Protein combining

Some cereals are deficient in the essential amino acid lysine, obliging vegetarian cultures to combine their diet of cereal grains with legumes to obtain a balanced diet. Many legumes, however, are deficient in the essential amino acid methionine, which grains contain. Thus, a combination of legumes with grains forms a well-balanced diet for vegetarians. Such combinations include dal (lentils) with rice by South Indians and Bengalis, beans with maize tortillas, tofu with rice, and peanut butter with wholegrain wheat bread (as sandwiches) in several other cultures, including the Americas.[79] For feeding animals, the amount of crude protein measured in grains is expressed as grain crude protein concentration.[80]

Comparison of major cereals

[edit]
Nutritional values for some major cereals[81]
Per 45g serving Barley Maize Millet Oats Rice Rye Sorgh. Wheat
Energy kcal 159 163 170 175 165 152 148 153
Protein g 5.6 3.6 5.0 7.6 3.4 4.6 4.8 6.1
Lipid g 1 1.6 1.9 3.1 1.4 0.7 1.6 1.1
Carbohydrate g 33 35 31 30 31 34 32 32
Fibre g 7.8 3.3 3.8 4.8 1.6 6.8 3.0 4.8
Calcium mg 15 3 4 24 4 11 6 15
Iron mg 1.6 1.5 1.3 2.1 0.6 1.2 1.5 1.6
Magnesium mg 60 57 51 80 52 50 74 65
Phosphorus mg 119 108 128 235 140 149 130 229
Potassium mg 203 129 88 193 112 230 163 194
Sodium mg 5 16 2 1 2 1 1 1
Zinc mg 1.2 0.8 0.8 1.8 1.0 1.2 0.7 1.9
Thiamine (B1) mg 0.29 0.17 0.19 0.34 0.24 0.14 0.15 0.19
Riboflavin (B2) mg 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.06 0.04 0.11 0.04 0.05
Niacin (B3) mg 2 1.6 2.1 0.4 2.9 1.9 1.7 3.0
Pantothenic acid (B5) mg 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.2 0.4
Pyridoxine (B6) mg 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.05 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2
Folic acid (B9) mcg 9 11 38 25 10 17 9 19

Production and trade commodities

[edit]
A grain elevator on fire in Ukraine, 2023. The Russian invasion of Ukraine disrupted its wheat exports and the global cereal trade.

Cereals constitute the world's largest commodities by tonnage, whether measured by production[82] or by international trade. Several major producers of cereals dominate the market.[83] Because of the scale of the trade, some countries have become reliant on imports, thus cereals pricing or availability can have outsized impacts on countries with a food trade imbalance and thus food security.[84] Speculation, as well as other compounding production and supply factors leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, created rapid inflation of grain prices during the 2007–2008 world food price crisis.[85] Other disruptions, such as climate change or war related changes to supply or transportation can create further food insecurity; for example the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 disrupted Ukrainian and Russian wheat supplies causing a global food price crisis in 2022 that affected countries heavily dependent on wheat flour.[86][87][88][89]

Production

[edit]
See also: List of countries by cereal production
Threshing teff, Ethiopia, 2007

Cereals are the world's largest crops by tonnage of grain produced.[82] Three cereals, maize, wheat, and rice, together accounted for 89% of all cereal production worldwide in 2012, and 43% of the global supply of food energy in 2009,[90] while the production of oats and rye has drastically fallen from their 1960s levels.[91]

Other cereals not included in the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization statistics include wild rice, which is grown in small amounts in North America, and teff, an ancient grain that is a staple in Ethiopia.[92] Teff is grown in sub-Saharan Africa as a grass primarily for feeding horses. It is high in fiber and protein. Its flour is often used to make injera. It can be eaten as a warm breakfast cereal like farina with a chocolate or nutty flavor.[92]

  • Production of cereals worldwide, by country in 2021
    Production of cereals worldwide, by country in 2021

The table shows the annual production of cereals in 1961, 1980, 2000, 2010, and 2019/2020.[a][93][91]

Grain Worldwide production

(millions of metric tons)

Notes
1961 1980 2000 2010 2019/20
Maize (corn) 205 397 592 852 1,148 A staple food of people in the Americas, Africa, and of livestock worldwide; often called corn in North America, Australia, and New Zealand. A large portion of maize crops are grown for purposes other than human consumption.[92]
Rice[b] Production is in milled terms. 285 397 599 697 755 The primary cereal of tropical and some temperate regions. Staple food in most of Brazil, other parts of Latin America and some other Portuguese-descended cultures, parts of Africa (even more before the Columbian exchange), most of South Asia and the Far East. Largely overridden by breadfruit (a dicot tree) during the South Pacific's part of the Austronesian expansion.[92]
Wheat 222 440 585 641 768 The primary cereal of temperate regions. It has a worldwide consumption but it is a staple food of North America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, Brazil and much of the Greater Middle East. Wheat gluten-based meat substitutes are important in the Far East (albeit less than tofu) and are said to resemble meat texture more than others.[92]
Barley 72 157 133 123 159 Grown for malting and livestock on land too poor or too cold for wheat.[92]
Sorghum 41 57 56 60 58 Important staple food in Asia and Africa and popular worldwide for livestock.[92]
Millet 26 25 28 33 28 A group of similar cereals that form an important staple food in Asia and Africa.[92]
Oats 50 41 26 20 23 Popular worldwide as a breakfast food, such as in porridge, and livestock feed.[94]
Triticale 0 0.17 9 14 — Hybrid of wheat and rye, grown similarly to rye.[92]
Rye 35 25 20 12 13 Important in cold climates. Rye grain is used for flour, bread, beer, crispbread, some whiskeys, some vodkas, and animal fodder.[92]
Fonio 0.18 0.15 0.31 0.56 — Several varieties are grown as food crops in Africa.[92]

Trade

[edit]
Further information: Grain trade
A bulk grain ship, 2006

Cereals are the most traded commodities by quantity in 2021, with wheat, maize, and rice the main cereals involved. The Americas and Europe are the largest exporters, and Asia is the largest importer.[83] The largest exporter of maize is the US, while India is the largest exporter of rice. China is the largest importer of maize and of rice. Many other countries trade cereals, both as exporters and as importers.[83] Cereals are traded as futures on world commodity markets, helping to mitigate the risks of changes in price for example, if harvests fail.[95]

  • Main traded cereals, top import, export in 2021
    Main traded cereals, top import, export in 2021

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]


Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cereal

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Cereals, also known as cereal grains, are annual plants primarily from the grass family () cultivated for their starchy seeds, botanically termed caryopses, which consist of the , germ, and . These grains serve as a foundational source of carbohydrates, providing roughly 50% of global dietary energy intake, with higher reliance in developing regions. The principal cereals—, , and —dominate production and consumption, accounting for over 60% of the world's calories and occupying two-thirds of cropland, underscoring their role in sustaining populations and . Global cereal output has expanded steadily, rising by 2% to include an additional 61 million tonnes in 2023 compared to 2022, driven largely by yields amid varying climatic conditions. Beyond direct consumption in forms like , , and tortillas, cereals support , biofuels, and industrial processing, though challenges such as soil degradation and yield variability highlight dependencies on agronomic practices and environmental factors.

History

Domestication in Prehistoric Times

The domestication of cereals marked a pivotal transition from societies to sedentary during the period, occurring independently across multiple regions between approximately 12,000 and 7,000 years ago. This process involved selective pressures on wild grasses, favoring traits such as non-shattering rachises for easier retention, larger grains, and synchronized maturation, which reduced harvesting losses and enabled storage. Archaeobotanical evidence, including charred remains and phytoliths, alongside genetic analyses, indicates that early cultivation began with intensive of wild stands before full traits fixed in populations. In the of the , einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum) and wheat (T. dicoccum) were domesticated from wild progenitors around 11,500–10,500 years ago, with initial evidence from sites in the southern Levant and southeastern Turkey's Karacadag Mountains. (Hordeum vulgare) followed closely, with non-brittle rachis mutations appearing by 10,000 years ago in the region's foothills, supported by spikelet remains from Syrian and Iraqi sites. These developments coincided with the , where cereal processing tools like sickles and grinding stones proliferated, though full spanned 2,000–3,000 years of cultivation. Genetic studies confirm a single primary origin for in this arc-shaped zone, with reduced diversity in domesticated lineages reflecting founder effects. In , rice () began in the River basin of around 10,000 years ago, evidenced by phytoliths and grain impressions from Shangshan site sediments, indicating early wet-field management and selection against shattering. (Setaria italica) and broomcorn millet ( miliaceum) emerged in northern 's region by 10,000 years ago, with remains from Cishan showing intensified harvesting of wild stands transitioning to domesticated forms suited to arid conditions. These parallel trajectories highlight regional adaptations to climates and floodplains, distinct from Near Eastern dry-farming. Maize (Zea mays) was domesticated in Mesoamerica's Balsas River valley of from teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) approximately 9,000 years ago, with macrofossil cobs from Guila Naquitz cave exhibiting enlarged kernels and reduced coverage by 6,250 years ago. This protracted process, involving hybridization and selection for multi-rowed ears, is corroborated by grain and cob morphology analyses, though maize contributed minimally to diets until 4,700 years ago in some areas. In , sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) occurred in the Sudanian savannas around 5,000–3,000 years ago from wild S. arundinaceum and related taxa, with archaeological grains from eastern sites showing tougher glumes and larger seeds. (Pennisetum glaucum) followed in West Africa's by the 2nd millennium BCE, evidenced by spikelet bases from , , reflecting selection for non-shattering in semi-arid environments. These later timelines relative to underscore Africa's diverse ecological niches and delayed intensification compared to riverine cores elsewhere.

Role in Ancient Civilizations and Expansion

In , emerged as the primary cereal due to its adaptation to dry, saline soils, supplemented by , which supported surplus production essential for urban centers and around 3000 BCE. These crops facilitated networks and administrative systems, as procurement underpinned imperial growth in the region. and cultivation, domesticated in the circa 10,000 years ago, spread westward to and by 6000 BCE, enabling basin systems that yielded staple breads and beers critical to Egyptian society's nutritional base from onward. Cereal agriculture expanded eastward via distinct routes, with barley reaching the Indus Valley by the second millennium BCE as a dominant , integral to Harappan and storage infrastructures like granaries. In , millets dominated the basin while cultivation arose independently in the region around 8000 years ago, forming the agrarian foundation for early dynastic states. and wheat followed divergent paths into , adapting to high-altitude Tibetan plateaus before integrating into lowland farming by the . Independently in , from teosinte began approximately 9000 years ago, evolving into the cornerstone of Mayan and other societies by 2000 BCE, where it supplied caloric needs, shaped religious via the Maize God, and drove agricultural intensification through techniques like slash-and-burn. This crop's yield improvements—larger seeds and non-shattering ears—mirrored cereal s, fostering population densities and complex polities despite isolated development. Overall, cereal surpluses across these cradles of enabled , labor specialization, and hierarchical structures, with dissemination via migration and exchange amplifying their socioeconomic impact.

Industrialization and the Green Revolution

The industrialization of cereal production commenced in the 19th century with key mechanization advances that reduced labor intensity and enabled larger-scale farming. In 1831, Cyrus McCormick invented the mechanical reaper, the first machine to harvest grain efficiently, allowing one operator to cut the work of several laborers in wheat and other cereal fields. This innovation spread rapidly in the United States and Europe, contributing to a shift from subsistence to commercial cereal agriculture. By the late 19th century, steam-powered threshing machines separated grains from stalks more quickly than manual methods, further boosting post-harvest efficiency for crops like barley and oats. The early 20th century introduced internal combustion engines, with gasoline tractors emerging around 1892 and gaining traction by the 1910s, replacing animal draft power and permitting cultivation of expansive cereal monocultures. Combine harvesters, which integrated , , and , became viable in the 1910s–1920s, exemplified by models from ; by mid-century, their adoption in the U.S. cut times from weeks to days per field. Concurrently, the Haber-Bosch process, scaled commercially by 1913, synthesized for fertilizers, addressing soil nutrient depletion in intensive cereal rotations and enabling yield doublings in nitrogen-responsive grains like and . These developments tripled U.S. farm output per worker between 1900 and 1950, though they concentrated production in mechanized regions and increased reliance on fossil fuels. The , spanning roughly 1943–1970, amplified industrialization through coordinated agronomic packages tailored to cereals, originating with breeding at the Rockefeller Foundation's Mexican program under . Semi-dwarf varieties, resistant to under heavy fertilization, raised Mexican yields from 750 kg/ha in the 1940s to 3,200 kg/ha by 1960, averting food shortages. These strains, introduced to and in 1965–1966 amid famine threats, tripled output there by 1970, with India's production surging from 11 million tons in 1960 to 26 million tons in 1971. For rice, the released high-yielding variety in 1966, which, combined with expanded irrigation and pesticides, boosted Asian yields by 30–50% within a decade; hybrids, refined earlier in the U.S. from the 1930s, extended similar gains in and . Globally, cereal production in developing nations doubled between 1961 and 1985, supporting from 3 billion to over 4.5 billion without proportional farmland expansion. While these advances demonstrably curbed —Borlaug's work credited with saving over a billion lives—their heavy dependence on synthetic inputs fostered environmental trade-offs, including depletion from (e.g., India's region saw water tables drop 1 meter annually by the 1980s) and soil degradation from . Empirical data from long-term trials indicate that without continued application, HYV yields revert toward traditional levels, underscoring a causal link to input-intensive systems rather than inherent genetic superiority alone. Institutional analyses, often from development agencies, emphasize gains but understate losses, as cereal acreage expanded at the expense of pulses and other crops.

Botanical and Genetic Characteristics

Classification within the Grass Family

Cereals comprise a subset of cultivated species within the family (also known as Gramineae), a monocotyledonous group of approximately 11,500 species distributed across 768 genera, representing the fifth-largest angiosperm family. This family is characterized by wind-pollinated flowers, reduced structures, and inflorescences, with cereals specifically valued for their edible, starchy grains derived from the caryopses. Phylogenetic analyses, incorporating molecular data such as rDNA and genes, have refined the classification into 12 subfamilies, emphasizing clades like the BEP (Bambusoideae-Ehrhartoideae-Pooideae) and PACMAD (Panicoideae-Arundinoideae-Chloridoideae-Micrairoideae-Danthonioideae-Aristidoideae), where most cereals reside. The major cereal crops are concentrated in three subfamilies: (cool-season, C3 photosynthetic pathway grasses predominant in temperate regions), (warm-season, C4 grasses adapted to tropical and subtropical environments), and Ehrhartoideae (a smaller group including aquatic-adapted species). , the largest subfamily with over 3,000 species, encompasses tribes such as Triticeae (e.g., , , ) and Aveneae (e.g., oats), reflecting shared morphological traits like compact spike inflorescences and requirements. , with around 3,300 species, includes the economically dominant tribe for and , and Paniceae for millets, distinguished by open panicle inflorescences and efficient enhancing drought tolerance. Ehrhartoideae features the Oryzeae tribe, home to , with adaptations for flooded cultivation. The classification of key cereals is summarized below:
Cereal CropGenus (Species Example)SubfamilyTribe
WheatTriticum (T. aestivum)Triticeae
Barley (H. vulgare)Triticeae
Oats (A. sativa)Aveneae
Rye (S. cereale)Triticeae
Rice (O. sativa)EhrhartoideaeOryzeae
MaizeZea (Z. mays)
Sorghum (S. bicolor)
Pearl MilletPennisetum (P. glaucum)
This taxonomy, derived from cladistic approaches integrating morphology, anatomy, and DNA sequences, underscores the polyphyletic origins of cereal domestication while highlighting convergent evolution in grain production traits across distant lineages. Minor cereals like fonio (Digitaria spp., Panicoideae) and teff (Eragrostis tef, Chloridoideae) occupy additional subfamilies, illustrating the family's broader diversity beyond the dominant staples.

Key Species and Varietal Diversity

The major cereal species, defined as edible grains from the Poaceae family, include wheat (Triticum spp.), rice (Oryza sativa L.), maize (Zea mays L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), and various millets, which collectively dominate global production surpassing 2.8 billion metric tons in the 2023-24 season. These species exhibit substantial varietal diversity through polyploidy, geographic adaptation, and selective breeding for traits like yield, disease resistance, and processing quality. Wheat production relies primarily on bread wheat (T. aestivum L.), a hexaploid (2n=42, AABBDD genomes) accounting for over 95% of output, alongside tetraploid durum wheat (T. durum Desf.) for and . Varietal diversity includes ancient forms like (T. spelta L.) and (T. dicoccum Schrank), but modern cultivars—numbering in the thousands—stem from 20th-century breeding emphasizing high content for leavened breads and hardness for milling. Genetic analyses using SNP markers reveal population structures tied to breeding pedigrees and regional adaptations, with narrower diversity in lines prompting relative incorporation for resilience. Rice (O. sativa) divides into indica and japonica subspecies, with indica varieties featuring long, slender grains suited to tropical lowlands and lower stickiness upon cooking due to intermediate levels, while japonica produces short, plump grains with higher for sticky textures in temperate uplands. This differentiation, rooted in ecogeographic races, supports thousands of landraces and hybrids bred for flood tolerance, aroma, and nutrition, including African rice (O. glaberrima Steud.) as a distinct with weedy traits. Maize, strictly Z. mays, displays kernel-type diversity including dent (field corn for feed and , with soft collapse), flint (hard, vitreous kernels for storage in ), flour ( for grinding), (expanded pericarp), and (high for fresh eating). Derived from teosinte around 9,000 years ago, varietal proliferation via open-pollinated and hybrid selections has yielded cultivars for maturity groups, color, and pest resistance, with over 300 races documented in . Barley features two-row (H. vulgare subsp. distichon) for in and six-row for higher yield in feed, while includes grain sorghums for food in and alongside sweet and types. Millets encompass (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) for drought-prone areas and (Panicum miliaceum L.), with varieties selected for tillering and bird resistance. Oats (Avena sativa L.) emphasize hulless or naked forms for milling, and (Secale cereale L.) prioritizes winter-hardy cultivars for poor soils. This varietal spectrum, amplified by hybridization since the mid-20th century, balances productivity gains against risks in systems.

Physiological Traits and Adaptations

Cereal crops, primarily annual herbaceous monocots in the family, display determinate growth patterns, initiating reproductive development after a vegetative phase characterized by tillering, where axillary buds produce side shoots to increase productive culms. Tillering enhances resource capture and yield potential, with the number of tillers influenced by environmental factors such as availability and planting . Physiologically, cereals vary in photosynthetic pathways: , , and employ the C3 pathway, which fixes CO2 via but suffers losses under high light and temperature; in contrast, , , and utilize the C4 pathway, concentrating CO2 around to minimize and improve water-use efficiency in arid conditions. Winter varieties of cereals like and require , a cold-induced physiological process necessitating prolonged exposure to low temperatures (typically 0–10°C for 4–8 weeks) to transition from vegetative to reproductive growth by upregulating floral identity genes such as VRN1. This synchronizes flowering with favorable spring conditions in temperate regions, with vernalization sensitivity varying by genotype—spring types flower without cold exposure. further modulates development, with long-day requirements in many temperate cereals promoting heading under increasing day lengths. Adaptations to abiotic stresses include morphological shifts like deeper root systems and reduced tillering under to conserve , alongside physiological responses such as osmotic adjustment via solute accumulation and enhanced activity to mitigate oxidative damage from or . In C4 cereals, Kranz anatomy—bundle sheath cells surrounding veins—facilitates spatial CO2 concentration, conferring superior tolerance (optimal at 30–40°C) compared to C3 types (optimal at 15–25°C). These traits underpin cereal resilience across diverse agroecologies, from Mediterranean to tropical highlands, though breeding continues to target improved stress tolerance via architecture and .

Agronomic Cultivation

Soil, Climate, and Site Selection

Cereal crops generally require well-drained soils with adequate fertility to support root penetration and nutrient absorption, as poor drainage promotes anaerobic conditions detrimental to most species. Loamy soils, combining sand, silt, and clay in balanced proportions, facilitate aeration and water retention without excessive compaction, yielding higher productivity compared to sandy or heavy clay soils alone. For wheat and barley, medium-fertile loams with good humus content are ideal, enabling tolerance to moderate alkalinity but sensitivity to acidity below pH 6.0, which induces aluminum toxicity and reduces yields. Maize demands deeper, nutrient-rich soils to accommodate its fibrous roots, with soil sampling recommended to assess nitrogen depth and organic matter levels prior to planting. Rice, uniquely among major cereals, thrives in heavy clay soils that retain water for flooded paddies, where anaerobic decomposition supports growth but risks methane emissions and nutrient leaching if mismanaged. Optimal climates vary by species, reflecting adaptations to , , and photoperiod, with temperate cereals like favoring cooler regimes of 15–25°C during growth and requirements below 10°C for flowering initiation. exhibits similar cool-season preferences but greater , succeeding in regions with 400–800 mm annual rainfall, while requires warmer conditions of 20–30°C and 500–800 mm , often supplemented by to avoid failure under heat stress above 35°C. demands humid subtropical or tropical climates with 1,000–2,000 mm rainfall or equivalent , optimal temperatures of 22–31°C, and 5–6 hours daily sunshine to maximize without excessive evaporation. These parameters underscore causal links between climatic mismatches and reduced yields, as evidenced by historical data showing 4–13% global shortfalls in , , and production attributable to warming trends deviating from historical optima. Site selection prioritizes and prior to minimize and carryover, favoring gently sloping fields with 0–5% gradients for uniform drainage and machinery access in upland cereals. Low-lying or flood-prone sites suit rice paddies but risk waterlogging for or , where perched water tables elevate root incidence; soil history must exclude persistent pathogens from prior solanaceous or crops. Ecological assessments, including wind exposure and proximity to habitats for hybrid varieties, further inform choices, with and historical data guiding avoidance of contaminated or nutrient-depleted parcels. Comprehensive suitability mapping integrates these factors, revealing that physico-chemical profiles and microclimatic variations can limit cereal viability in marginal zones without amendments.
CerealPreferred Soil TextureOptimal pHKey Climate Notes
WheatLoamy, well-drained6.0–7.5Cool temperate; 500–1,000 mm rainfall; frost-tolerant
BarleyMedium loamy, porous6.0–8.0Cool, drought-tolerant; 400–800 mm rainfall
MaizeDeep, fertile loamy5.8–7.0Warm; 20–30°C; often needed
RiceHeavy clay, water-retentive5.5–7.0Humid tropical/subtropical; flooded conditions

Planting, Growth Management, and Harvesting

Planting of cereal crops involves site-specific timing and methods tailored to species, , and conditions to optimize establishment and yield. For , optimal planting in the U.S. Midwest occurs from late April to early May, with seeds sown 5 to 7.5 centimeters deep in rows spaced 76 to 100 centimeters apart, using seeding rates of 11 to 17 kilograms per for production. Wheat in temperate regions like the southern U.S. is typically drilled in , with seeding rates of about 26 seeds per when planted within recommended windows to ensure tillering and stand density. Rice planting varies, with direct seeding or ; in subtropical areas, yields peak from mid-March plantings, as later dates reduce due to shorter growth periods and heat stress. Growth management encompasses nutrient application, water supply, and pest mitigation to support physiological stages from to maturity. Fertilization targets , , and needs, with cereals under requiring precise rates to avoid deficiencies or excesses that impair yield; for instance, demands balanced inputs during stem elongation and grain fill for maximal biomass accumulation. is critical for , often involving flooded paddies to suppress weeds and enhance nutrient uptake, while and rely on supplemental watering in dry conditions to maintain and . Pest control employs (IPM), combining monitoring, cultural practices like , and targeted pesticides to minimize losses from insects, diseases, and weeds without over-reliance on chemicals that could foster resistance. Harvesting occurs when grain reaches physiological maturity, typically at 12-18% content to minimize costs and degradation. Major cereals like and are mechanically harvested using combine harvesters that cut, , and clean in one pass, suitable for large-scale operations and reducing labor compared to manual sickles or reapers used in smaller fields. harvesting may involve combines adapted for wet conditions or manual methods followed by , with timing critical to avoid shattering losses in upright panicles. Post-cutting, grains are separated from via and , ensuring clean product for storage.

Post-Harvest Handling and Storage

Post-harvest handling of cereal grains begins immediately after harvesting to minimize quality degradation and losses. Threshing separates grains from ears or cobs, followed by winnowing or cleaning to remove chaff, dirt, and impurities, which can harbor pests or promote spoilage if left in storage. Drying is essential, reducing moisture content from typical harvest levels of 20-30% to safe storage thresholds of 13-14% or lower to inhibit fungal growth and microbial activity. Effective storage requires controlled environmental conditions to preserve grain viability and . Grains should be stored at temperatures below 15°C with relative under 65-70% to prevent respiration-induced heating and mold development. systems in or bins facilitate cooling and uniform moisture distribution, while regular monitoring detects hot spots or infestations early. Common storage methods include bulk for large-scale operations, bagged storage for smaller quantities, and hermetic systems that limit oxygen to suppress without chemical fumigants. Pest management is critical, as insects like weevils and can cause significant losses through consumption and contamination. Integrated approaches combine , , and targeted fumigation with or controlled atmospheres, though overuse risks resistance development. Post-harvest losses in cereals average 14% globally before retail, rising to 20-50% in regions with inadequate due to spoilage, pests, and improper handling. In traditional systems, losses hover around 5%, but inefficiencies in and storage amplify them where modern equipment is absent.

Global Production and Economics

Asia dominates global cereal production, accounting for more than 50% of the total output, with China and India as the leading producers due to extensive cultivation of rice, wheat, and maize across vast arable lands supported by monsoon climates and irrigation systems. In 2023, China's cereal production exceeded 633 million metric tons, driven by high-yield hybrid varieties and intensive farming practices, while India's output focused on rice and wheat contributed substantially to regional totals. North America, particularly the United States, ranks second globally, with maize production reaching a record 427 million metric tons in 2023, facilitated by mechanized large-scale farming, genetically modified seeds, and fertile Midwest soils. Europe and South America follow, with Russia and Brazil producing significant wheat and maize volumes, respectively, though geopolitical disruptions like the Russia-Ukraine conflict have impacted European yields and exports.
CountryProduction (million metric tons, 2023)
634
~500 (dominated by maize)
~330 (rice and wheat)
~120 (maize)
~100 (wheat)
Global cereal yields have shown steady improvement, rising from approximately 2,870 kg per hectare in 2000 to 4,182 kg per hectare in 2022, reflecting advancements in , synthetic fertilizers, and that enhance and nutrient uptake under varying environmental conditions. In high-productivity regions like and , average yields exceed 7,000 kg/ha for major cereals, achieved through optimal input combinations including fertilizers and pest-resistant hybrids, whereas sub-Saharan Africa lags at under 2,000 kg/ha due to limited access to improved seeds, erratic rainfall, and soil nutrient deficiencies. These disparities highlight causal factors such as in agricultural and , with from FAO indicating that yield gaps persist where biophysical constraints like or acidic soils are not addressed through targeted amendments. Yield trends since the demonstrate exponential gains through causal mechanisms like dwarfing genes in and that allow higher plant densities and application without , alongside expansion that stabilized output against weather variability. However, post-2010 growth has decelerated in mature agricultural systems, with global averages plateauing around 3,800-4,200 kg/ha amid diminishing marginal returns from chemical inputs, which can degrade and increase vulnerability to pests and droughts. Recent data show fluctuations, such as a 2% global production increase in 2023 driven by yield recoveries in the , but projections indicate slower expansion through 2034 due to climate-induced stresses like elevated temperatures reducing grain fill in tropical regions. underscores that improvements require integrating conservation tillage and crop rotations to maintain , countering overuse effects observed in intensively farmed areas.

Trade Dynamics and Market Influences

Global cereal trade volumes fluctuate based on production surpluses and demands, with the FAO forecasting 497.1 million tonnes for 2025/26, an increase of 3.7 million tonnes from prior estimates driven by expected higher and coarse exports. In 2023, the led exporters by value at $19.11 billion, followed by , , , and , reflecting competitive advantages in scale and for , corn, and other grains. Importers, primarily in and , rely on these flows for , with significantly increasing broken rice imports from 2020 to 2022 amid corn price surges, substituting for . Trade dynamics are shaped by regional production cycles and transport efficiencies, such as shipments from and ports, where disruptions like the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict initially spiked exports via alternative routes before stabilizing. Corn trade, heavily influenced by U.S. and Brazilian surpluses, supports dual food and demands, exposing it to linkages and policy shifts. Rice dynamics differ, with Asian exporters like and dominating, though global competition and weather variability in monsoon-dependent regions affect flows to importers like the . Market influences include weather-induced supply variability and geopolitical tensions, contributing to price volatility; wheat and corn prices rose 1.8-fold and 2.8-fold respectively from 2000 to 2023, correlated with crude oil dynamics and extreme events. In 2024, the FAO Cereal Price Index fell 13.3% to an average 113.5 points, the second consecutive annual decline, due to abundant harvests in , the U.S., and Black Sea exporters outpacing demand amid strong inter-exporter competition. Additional factors encompass biofuel mandates boosting coarse grain demand and currency fluctuations impacting competitiveness, though ample global stocks tempered extremes in late 2024.

Policy Impacts Including Subsidies and Tariffs

In the , federal subsidies for cereal crops primarily operate through the Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) programs under the 2018 Farm Bill, extended into subsequent years, covering commodities such as corn, , and . Corn, the dominant subsidized cereal, received $3.2 billion in 2024, accounting for 30.5% of total federal farm subsidies, while direct government payments across are projected at $40.5 billion for 2025, driven largely by premiums and revenue protections amid volatile prices. These mechanisms provide payments when market prices or revenues fall below reference levels, with base acre allocations favoring historic production of program crops, resulting in concentrated benefits to large-scale producers in the Midwest. The European Union's () allocates €387 billion for 2021-2027, with €291.1 billion directed to the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund for direct income support to farmers, including those producing cereals like and . While coupled payments tied to cereal output have diminished, decoupled area-based payments still incentivize maintaining cereal acreage, though empirical analysis shows most CAP subsidies exert negative or insignificant effects on for cereal farms, except for targeted agri-environmental schemes. This structure has historically promoted surplus production, enabling export refunds that effectively subsidize EU cereal exports, depressing global prices. Globally, agricultural subsidies totaling approximately $540 billion annually, with a significant portion directed toward cereals, stimulate production by 0.9% and by 0.6%, as modeled from production-linked incentives in major economies. These distort trade flows more severely than equivalent tariffs, with ad valorem equivalents of distortions roughly double those of tariffs in , fostering and market dumping that disadvantages unsubsidized farmers in developing countries. Tariffs on cereal imports, governed by the World Trade Organization's since , mandate tariffication of prior non-tariff barriers, with bound rates establishing ceilings—often exceeding 20% for cereals in many members—and permitting special safeguards for surges in imports. Applied tariffs remain higher in net-importing developing countries, averaging above bound commitments for grains, while major exporters like the and maintain low or zero tariffs on cereals to facilitate outflows, though retaliatory measures, such as those in 2018-2019 disputes, imposed 25% tariffs on agricultural products including soybeans (a key cereal feed), reducing exports by billions and redirecting to alternative markets. These policies collectively elevate domestic cereal production in subsidized regions—evident in US corn yields sustained despite market signals—but suppress international prices, with EU export subsidies historically lowering global cereal values by encouraging dumping volumes exceeding 10 million tons annually in the 1990s-2000s. Environmentally, production-boosting subsidies correlate with intensified input use, contributing to soil degradation and emissions, while tariff protections in importers like or shield local producers but inflate consumer costs; simulations indicate subsidy removal could raise prices 10-20% in such markets. Trade distortions from subsidies and retaliatory s have reshaped flows, diminishing US shares in key destinations and heightening volatility, as seen in post-2018 grain export declines to .

Nutritional Composition and Human Health

Macronutrient Profiles Across Cereals

Cereals, as staple grains, derive the majority of their caloric content from carbohydrates, primarily in the form of starch, which constitutes 60-80% of dry weight across species, enabling efficient energy storage and human utilization. Protein content varies significantly, from approximately 7% in rice to over 15% in oats, reflecting differences in endosperm composition and breeding priorities, while fats remain low at 1-6%, concentrated in the germ and bran layers. These profiles are measured on uncooked, whole-grain basis per 100 grams dry matter, though actual values fluctuate with cultivar, soil conditions, and processing; data from USDA analyses provide standardized averages. The table below summarizes macronutrient compositions for major cereals, highlighting relative abundances: and offer higher proteins suitable for bread-making formation, oats provide elevated from like avenolipids, and contains more extractable oils from its pericarp.
CerealProtein (g)Fat (g)Carbohydrates (g)
(whole)12.62.571.2
(brown)7.92.777.2
(corn)9.44.774.3
(pearled)12.52.373.5
Oats16.96.966.3
11.03.372.9
Millet11.04.272.9
Values exclude , which is subsumed under carbohydrates in some assays but typically adds 2-15g/100g; proteins in cereals are often lysine-deficient, limiting nutritional completeness without complementary foods. Refined processing reduces these macros by removing and germ, lowering and fats while concentrating , as seen in (protein ~7g/100g versus brown's 8g) or pearled , potentially diminishing and synergy despite yield gains. Empirical studies confirm whole-grain retention preserves higher indices, though digestibility varies; for instance, maize's protein requires for optimal .

Micronutrients, Digestibility, and Bioavailability

Cereals provide several micronutrients, including such as thiamin, , niacin, and , as well as minerals like iron, , magnesium, and , though concentrations vary by type and processing level. contains approximately 3.6 mg of iron and 2.6 mg of zinc per 100 g, while offers about 1.5 mg of iron and 2.0 mg of zinc per 100 g, and provides 2.7 mg of iron and 2.2 mg of zinc per 100 g, according to USDA data. These levels decline significantly in refined forms due to the removal of and germ layers, which concentrate most micronutrients. Digestibility of cereal carbohydrates is generally high, with hydrolysis rates exceeding 95% in refined products, enabling rapid glucose release, though whole grains exhibit lower digestibility (around 85-90%) due to intact cell walls and content that resist enzymatic breakdown. Cereal proteins, comprising 7-14% of dry weight, show moderate digestibility, with true ileal digestibility values of 75-90% influenced by cross-linked prolamins and bonds that hinder access, particularly in and . The protein digestibility-corrected (PDCAAS) for major cereals is low, typically 0.4-0.6 for and due to limitation, reflecting suboptimal utilization despite adequate apparent digestibility in refined forms. Bioavailability of micronutrients in cereals is often limited by anti-nutritional factors, notably (myo-inositol hexaphosphate), present at 0.5-2.5% of dry weight, which forms insoluble complexes with divalent cations like iron and , reducing absorption. Empirical studies indicate non-heme iron absorption from high-phytate cereal meals averages 1-5%, compared to 15-35% from sources, with phytate dose-dependently suppressing uptake in trials. bioavailability from cereals similarly ranges from 4-17%, far below the 20-40% from animal proteins, exacerbating deficiencies in populations reliant on grain-based diets. Processing methods like , , or milling can degrade phytates by 20-80%, enhancing mineral bioaccessibility, as demonstrated in and interventions. B vitamins generally exhibit higher bioavailability, though niacin in requires alkali processing () for release from bound forms.

Evidence-Based Health Outcomes and Dietary Roles

Cereals serve as a primary dietary source of carbohydrates, providing essential energy through complex like , alongside , , and minerals such as iron and magnesium in whole forms. In global diets, they constitute 40-60% of caloric intake in many populations, supporting metabolic functions via sustained glucose release when unrefined. Fortified varieties, including ready-to-eat breakfast cereals, enhance delivery, correlating with higher intakes of , vitamins, and minerals while aligning with lower consumption in observational data. Prospective cohort meta-analyses indicate that higher consumption—typically 28-90 grams daily—associates with 15-25% reduced risk of coronary heart disease, , and all-cause mortality, independent of other factors like and intake. For , each 30-gram daily increment links to a 9-21% lower incidence, attributed to fiber-mediated glycemic control and effects from components. Cancer risks, including colorectal and total, decrease by 10-17% with elevated intake, per pooled data from over 700,000 participants, though requires caution due to residual confounding in non-randomized designs. Refined grain intake, by contrast, shows neutral or adverse associations: meta-analyses of cohorts reveal higher consumption correlates with greater long-term (up to 0.4 kg per 4-year period per serving increase) and risk, lacking the and phytochemicals of whole grains that promote and microbiota health. Randomized trials yield mixed results, with some demonstrating modest body fat reduction from whole grains but no significant overall, suggesting benefits accrue primarily in diets rather than calorie-restricted ones. Specific risks temper universal endorsement: celiac disease, triggered by gluten in wheat, barley, and rye, affects approximately 1% of Western populations, causing villous atrophy and nutrient malabsorption upon exposure. , while self-reported by up to 10%, lacks robust evidence in double-blind challenges, with meta-analyses estimating true prevalence below 1% after excluding effects and wheat component confounders like FODMAPs. , a key cereal, accumulates inorganic from irrigated soils, with brown varieties exceeding white by 80% in concentration; chronic intake above 0.2 mg/kg raises cancer and cardiovascular risks, particularly in high-consumption regions like , per exposure models. In dietary roles, cereals facilitate balanced when prioritized as whole forms, per evidence-based guidelines favoring at least half of grains unrefined to mitigate refined variants' links to metabolic dysregulation. Ready-to-eat cereals associate with lower cardiovascular mortality in cohorts, likely via and substitution for higher-calorie foods, though added sugars in some products necessitate moderation. Overall, empirical data affirm cereals' value for energy provision and chronic disease prevention in context of whole-grain emphasis, outweighed by risks only in genetically susceptible or contaminant-exposed subgroups.

Processing and Utilizations

Direct Human Consumption

Cereals are consumed directly by humans primarily after cleaning, hulling, and cooking with minimal alteration to the grain structure, such as , , or toasting, to enhance digestibility and flavor while preserving nutritional components like and micronutrients in the and germ. This contrasts with extensive milling or refining, which removes outer layers. Globally, direct consumption accounts for a substantial share of cereal use for , particularly in regions reliant on staples like and , where over 40% of produced grains enter human diets rather than feed or industrial uses. Rice exemplifies direct consumption, often boiled intact after polishing or , forming the basis of meals in and ; for instance, retains its husk-removed whole form and is simmered in at ratios of 1:2 grain to liquid for 40-50 minutes until tender. is similarly prepared by boiling fresh cobs or dry kernels into porridges like in or posho in , involving soaking or in lime to improve texture and availability before cooking. Oats, consumed as steel-cut or rolled groats, are traditionally cooked into by simmering in or for 20-30 minutes, a practice dating to ancient where soaking overnight in acidic medium reduces anti-nutrients like . Other cereals follow analogous methods: barley is boiled for soups or pilafs, with whole grains requiring 3:1 water ratios and 45-60 minutes simmering; wheat berries or bulgur (parboiled cracked wheat) are hydrated and cooked for salads like tabbouleh; and millets or sorghums yield thin porridges in sub-Saharan Africa through grinding lightly post-cooking or fermenting batters. These techniques, rooted in pre-industrial practices, often incorporate fermentation or sprouting to break down enzyme inhibitors, as seen in traditional Asian rice ferments or African sorghum porridges, enhancing bioavailability without mechanical processing. In low-income settings, such direct uses dominate due to limited milling infrastructure, contributing to higher whole-grain intake compared to refined products prevalent in industrialized nations.

Derived Products Including Flours and Feeds

Cereal grains are processed through milling to yield , a key derived product essential for , , and thickeners. dominates production, obtained by grinding cleaned kernels into refined flour or variants including and germ for higher content. Other flours from cereals such as corn ( or fine-ground for tortillas and baking), (gluten-free for Asian noodles and gluten-sensitive products), (low-gluten for flatbreads), (for hearty with distinct flavor), and (mild, gluten-free for porridges) vary in protein levels from 5-8% in cake flours to 12-15% in bread flours, influencing elasticity and texture. The global market was valued at USD 173.02 billion in 2023, reflecting its staple role in food systems. Milling byproducts like (rich in from the outer layers) and germ are repurposed as nutrient-dense additives in animal feeds, enhancing digestibility and providing economical protein sources. Distillers dried grains, derived from wet-milling and of or other cereals for , offer high-protein (25-30%) co-products that replace soy in and diets, with global output tied to expansion. Cereals constitute a major energy component in feeds, with , , , and ground or whole-fed to , , and for supply. Globally, around one-third of cereal production—approximately 900-1,000 million metric tons annually—is allocated to , driven by demand for and . predominates as the benchmark energy grain, comprising up to 60-70% of and rations due to its high content (70%) and . In the , cereals form 25% of food-producing animal diets, mostly fodder varieties like and , while globally only 13% of total intake derives from cereals, supplemented by forages and proteins. Processing methods like steam-flaking or improve nutrient bioavailability, mitigating anti-nutritional factors in raw grains.

Industrial Applications Beyond Food

Cereal grains, especially , are a major feedstock for production, with being the predominant output. In the United States, corn-based accounts for over 40% of total corn utilization, reflecting its role in blending with to meet renewable fuel standards. U.S. production totaled approximately 15.4 billion gallons in , nearly all derived from via processes that convert grain carbohydrates into alcohol. This application diverts significant volumes from food and feed chains, with about 35% of U.S. directed toward and coproducts like for . Starch extracted from cereals such as , corn, and supports diverse non-food manufacturing sectors through wet milling, which separates for modification into industrial derivatives. In the paper and packaging industries, cereal starches function as adhesives, binders, and coatings; for instance, is applied in corrugated board to bond layers and provide . Modified starches enhance 's wet strength, surface smoothness, and retention, with the paper sector consuming a substantial portion of global output. and corn starches are also processed into general-purpose adhesives for , textiles, and labeling, leveraging their natural gelling and thickening properties after chemical or physical alteration. Emerging applications include bioplastics, where cereal starches serve as renewable bases for biodegradable polymers, reducing reliance on petroleum-derived materials in and films. These starch-based bioplastics exhibit tunable mechanical properties suitable for single-use items, though remains constrained by cost and performance relative to conventional plastics. Additionally, cereal byproducts like husks contribute to adsorbents for , removing contaminants such as and dyes, though this represents a minor fraction compared to primary grain uses. Overall, non-food industrial demands for cereal starches emphasize their versatility in binding and structural roles, driven by abundance and renewability.

Environmental Footprint

Land, Water, and Input Resource Demands

Cereal production occupies a substantial portion of global , with the harvested area for all cereals totaling approximately 710 million hectares in 2021, accounting for roughly half of the world's dedicated to annual . This land demand has remained relatively stable over recent decades despite production increases, primarily due to yield enhancements from improved varieties and management practices rather than area expansion. Major cereals—, , and —dominate usage, with and often suited to rainfed systems in temperate regions, while paddies necessitate dedicated flooded areas that constrain land multifunctionality. Water demands for cereals vary significantly by crop physiology, climate, and cultivation method, often comprising the largest volumetric input in irrigated systems. The global average for stands at 1,827 cubic meters per metric ton, encompassing green from rainfall, blue from , and grey for assimilating pollutants. production exhibits the highest intensity among major cereals, frequently requiring 2,500 to 5,000 cubic meters per ton due to continuous flooding for and yield maximization, contributing to elevated blue consumption in regions like . , by contrast, has a lower footprint of about 1,000 to 1,500 cubic meters per ton, benefiting from more efficient in . Globally, cereals account for over half of crop-related grey footprints, with , , and together demanding 356 billion cubic meters annually to dilute runoff. Fertilizer inputs represent a critical demand, enabling the high yields necessary to meet global food needs on finite . Around 60% of worldwide fertilizer application targets , , and production, with total cereal use correlating directly with output expansions since the . deficiencies can reduce yields by up to 40%, illustrating the direct causal role of these inputs in accumulation and grain filling. and further support proliferation and stress tolerance, with cereal systems typically requiring balanced NPK ratios; global trends show a 30% rise in application per unit of production from 1961 to 2022, though efficiency gains have moderated absolute increases. Other inputs, including pesticides for pest management and energy for and , add to intensity but are secondary to fertilizers in volumetric and cost terms for most cereal systems.
CerealAverage Water Footprint (m³/ton)Primary Components
1,827Green (72%), Blue (13%), Grey (15%)
~1,200Green dominant in rainfed areas
~3,000+High blue from

Emissions, Soil Degradation, and Ecosystem Effects

Cereal production generates greenhouse gas emissions primarily through nitrous oxide (N₂O) from nitrogen fertilizer application in crops such as wheat and maize, and methane (CH₄) from anaerobic conditions in flooded rice paddies. Globally, rice cultivation accounted for approximately 39 million metric tons of methane emissions in 2022, representing about 8-12% of total anthropogenic methane sources. N₂O emissions arise from microbial processes in fertilized soils, with agriculture contributing nearly all anthropogenic N₂O globally; fertilizer-driven N₂O has increased 20% since pre-industrial levels due to expanded crop production. Crop residue management and machinery fuel use add further CO₂ equivalents, though non-rice cereals emit less CH₄ directly. Intensive cereal farming contributes to soil degradation via , compaction, and nutrient depletion, exacerbated by , , and removal of residues. Water alone reduces and yields by 3% across half of global cropland, with slope and rainfall intensity as key drivers. In the United States , corn production erodes roughly 1.5 pounds of per pound of grain harvested, and one-third of farmland has lost its carbon-rich layer entirely. These processes diminish , lowering water retention and fertility, which necessitates higher inputs to maintain yields. Ecosystem effects of large-scale cereal agriculture include habitat conversion, biodiversity reduction, and pollution from agrochemical runoff. Expansion for cereals drives deforestation and grassland clearance, with agriculture posing a direct threat to 24,000 of 28,000 assessed species via habitat loss. Monocultures limit habitat diversity for pollinators and wildlife, while nitrogen and phosphorus runoff from fertilized fields causes eutrophication in freshwater and coastal systems, leading to algal blooms and dead zones. Pesticide applications further disrupt non-target species, amplifying local biodiversity declines in intensively farmed regions.

Yield-Driven Land Sparing and Empirical Mitigations

Yield-driven land sparing in cereal production involves intensifying yields on existing farmland to meet demands while minimizing expansion into natural habitats, thereby preserving and ecosystem services. This strategy contrasts with land sharing, which integrates habitat features within farms at lower intensities. Empirical analyses of global trends indicate that cereal yield improvements have substantially curbed cropland expansion; from 1961 to 2017, average cereal yields rose by 175%, enabling production to triple with only marginal increases in harvested area, sparing an estimated 150 million hectares of potential cropland. The , spanning the 1960s to 1980s, exemplified this through semi-dwarf and varieties, expanded , and use, which tripled cereal output on a 30% land increase despite doubling. Recent meta-analyses, however, reveal that neither pure land sparing nor universally optimizes agriculture-biodiversity trade-offs, with 41% of studied cases favoring sparing and outcomes varying by , , and sensitivity. For cereals, high-yield intensification outperforms for conserving habitat-dependent , as modeled in European and global scenarios where yield maximization spares land for high-conservation value areas. Over six decades to 2020, yield gains offset expansion pressures from and dietary changes, though regional yield gaps in developing areas persist, suggesting further sparing potential. Empirical mitigations enhancing yield-driven outcomes include , which boosts cereal yields by 4% on average while cutting inefficiency by 7%, use by 9%, and fuel consumption by 6%, reducing per-unit environmental footprints. practices, such as no-till and cover cropping, sustain cereal production levels—yielding comparable outputs to conventional methods—while improving by 21% and mitigating and emissions, even under warming conditions. High-yielding varieties, when paired with targeted inputs, further enable sparing by closing yield gaps without proportional increases, as evidenced in set-aside policies where 5-10% yield boosts offset output declines from retired farmland. These approaches, grounded in field trials and global datasets, demonstrate causal links between intensification and reduced habitat conversion pressures in cereal systems.

Controversies and Empirical Debates

Genetically Modified Varieties: Safety and Efficacy

Genetically modified (GM) cereal varieties, predominantly and , incorporate traits such as insect resistance via (Bt) toxins and herbicide tolerance, with rice variants like engineered for enhanced beta-carotene production to address . constitutes the primary GM cereal, with over 90% of U.S. production utilizing GM seeds by 2023, enabling traits that reduce crop losses from pests like corn borers. Regulatory approvals for these varieties, including those from the U.S. FDA and equivalents in other nations, require compositional analysis equivalent to non-GM counterparts, with no detected toxicological differences in approved products. Empirical safety data from over 3,000 studies and endorsements by more than 280 scientific institutions affirm that GM cereals pose no unique risks beyond those of conventional breeding, with no verified cases of harm to humans or animals after 28 years of widespread consumption. The states that GM foods on the international market, including cereal derivatives, have undergone safety assessments and are unlikely to present human risks, based on evaluations of allergenicity, , and nutritional equivalence. A 2015 report, reviewing GE crops through that year, found no substantiated evidence of risks from approved varieties, attributing rare reported anomalies to methodological flaws in dissenting studies rather than causal links. Claims of adverse effects, such as those in select animal feeding trials, often fail replication and are critiqued for lacking controls comparable to conventional crop variability, with meta-analyses confirming compositional parity. On efficacy, meta-analyses of field trials demonstrate that GM cereal adoption, especially Bt maize, yields an average 22% production increase globally, alongside a 37% reduction in insecticide applications, due to targeted minimizing yield losses estimated at 10-20% in non-GM fields. Farmer profits rise by 68% on average from these gains, with nitrogen use efficiency improved in engineered varieties, reducing fertilizer needs by up to 20% without yield penalties. For , human bioavailability studies in show it delivers equivalents comparable to or supplements, potentially averting 500,000 cases of annually in deficient regions if scaled. Regulatory bodies, including in 2018, have deemed as safe as conventional , with field trials confirming stable beta-carotene retention and no ecological disruptions. Controversial assertions of inefficacy or hidden risks, often from advocacy groups, contrast with this data; for instance, yield benefits persist despite initial hype, as verified in long-term adoption metrics from 1996 onward, though regulatory delays in regions like the have limited broader empirical validation. Overall, causal evidence supports GM cereals' role in enhancing via higher outputs and input efficiencies, outweighing unverified safety concerns in peer-reviewed aggregates.

Chemical Inputs Versus Yield Losses in Alternatives

Modern cereal production relies heavily on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides to achieve high yields, with global nitrogen fertilizer application on cereals correlating strongly with yield increases from approximately 1 per in the to over 4 per by 2020. The Haber-Bosch process for synthesis has enabled this tripling of yields since the mid-20th century, preventing widespread by supporting without proportional land expansion. Without pesticides, empirical estimates indicate potential cereal yield losses of up to 32%, based on pest pressure data from global agricultural models. Alternatives such as , which prohibit synthetic inputs, exhibit consistent yield gaps compared to conventional systems. Meta-analyses of field trials show organic cereal yields averaging 20-30% lower than conventional counterparts, with specific estimates ranging from 19.2% (Ponisio et al., 2015) to 25% overall and up to 30% for cereals (Tuck et al., 2021). A 2023 global across zones confirmed an 18.4% gap, widening to 45% in certain temperate subtypes where limitations are acute. These deficits arise from reduced availability, increased competition, and higher incidence without chemical controls, as organic systems depend on slower-building and biological pest management. The yield penalties in alternatives amplify land requirements to maintain output, potentially offsetting environmental gains from reduced chemical runoff. Producing equivalent cereal volumes organically would necessitate 25% more cropland, elevating pressures on habitats and increasing net through expanded or tillage, as evidenced by life-cycle assessments showing organic systems' land-use intensity drives comparable or higher total emissions despite lower per-hectare inputs. Conventional chemical use, while contributing to localized and residues (often below safety thresholds in cereals), enables sparing that preserves hotspots, a causal dynamic supported by yield-driven intensification models. This trade-off underscores that forgoing chemicals risks greater disruption via , prioritizing empirical yield data over assumptions of inherent organic superiority.

Monoculture Risks Balanced Against Food Security Gains

Monoculture practices in cereal production, involving the extensive cultivation of single varieties like or over large areas, heighten vulnerability to pests and due to reduced and the absence of natural ecological buffers. The 1970 epidemic in the exemplifies this risk, where a fungal exploited the uniform Texas male sterile cytoplasm in hybrid varieties, destroying approximately 15% of the national crop—equivalent to 710 million bushels—and causing losses estimated at $1 billion in contemporary terms. Similarly, outbreaks, such as the 1916 epidemic that obliterated nearly 300 million bushels across the and , demonstrate how amplify propagation when virulent strains overcome prevalent resistances. These events underscore causal vulnerabilities: uniform planting facilitates rapid spread, exacerbating yield losses that can reach 20-25% in susceptible systems without intervention. Despite these hazards, enables substantial gains through optimized yields and , as cereals—primarily , , and —supply about 50% of global dietary calories, with contributions exceeding 48% in developing regions where pressures demand efficient production. High-yield monocultural systems, supported by and inputs, have driven cereal output to feed billions, averting widespread amid from 2.5 billion in 1950 to over 8 billion today, with global cereal production surpassing 2.7 billion metric tons annually by 2021. Empirical data indicate that specialized monocultures often outperform diversified rotations in short-term caloric output per , particularly under intensive management, as polycultures can yield 5-10% less for staples like without compensatory measures. Balancing these factors requires weighing unmanaged risks against managed benefits, where empirical mitigations like genetic resistance breeding, targeted fungicides, and limited rotations have curtailed scales post-1970, sustaining yield stability. While rotations enhance long-term and can boost cereal yields by up to 10% through pest suppression and cycling, full diversification often incurs higher labor costs and lower net returns in calorie-dense systems, potentially compromising in resource-constrained areas. Thus, hybrid approaches—monocultures with —predominate, as evidenced by resilient global supplies despite recurrent threats, prioritizing scalable production to meet caloric demands over absolute risk elimination.

References

  1. https://agrovoc.fao.org/browse/agrovoc/en/page/c_25512
  2. https://www.cerealsgrains.org/publications/onlinebooks/textbook/Pages/Chapter1Abstract.aspx
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9086769/
  4. https://www.iatp.org/changing-climate-risks-global-cereal-production-trade
  5. https://landinstitute.org/learn/case-study-2021/
  6. https://www.fao.org/statistics/highlights-archive/highlights-detail/agricultural-production-statistics-2010-2023/en
  7. https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en
  8. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1612797113
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5324541/
  10. https://www.eupedia.com/history/timeline_of_plant_and_animal_domestication.shtml
  11. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jipb.12737
  12. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/17/4/499/1127626
  13. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-05/30/c_136324734.htm
  14. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/millet-the-missing-piece-in-the-puzzle-of-prehistoric-humans-transition-from-hunter-gatherers-to
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5576806/
  16. https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/ancient-dna-continues-rewrite-corns-9000-year-society-shaping-history
  17. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.666075/full
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8550313/
  19. https://www.nature.com/articles/138270a0.pdf
  20. https://www.palouseheritage.com/blog/2017/2/10/ancient-grains-and-harvests-part-1
  21. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/9/agriculture-in-the-fertile-crescent--mesopotamia/
  22. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/713deede60f84f1abea3c1cae5452f10
  23. https://www.peepultree.world/livehistoryindia/story/lhi-circle/tracing-indias-food-journey-i
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6499764/
  25. https://evolution.earthathome.org/grasses/andropogoneae/maize-culture/
  26. https://fiveable.me/rise-fall-ancient-mayan-civilization/unit-4/maize-cultivation-significance/study-guide/4gB0YjaqgHdRRile
  27. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2304407120
  28. https://www.farm-equipment.com/articles/4269-timeline-of-ag-equipment-firsts
  29. https://www.tstar.com/blog/history-of-agriculture-equipment-important-developments-and-examples
  30. https://www.crestcapital.com/tax/timeline_of_tractors
  31. https://www.thoughtco.com/american-farm-tech-development-4083328
  32. https://foodsystemprimer.org/production/industrialization-of-agriculture
  33. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/green-revolution-norman-borlaug-race-to-fight-global-hunger/
  34. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1970/borlaug/lecture/
  35. https://open.oregonstate.education/cultivatedplants/chapter/geneticimprovements/
  36. https://www.agdaily.com/insights/the-green-revolutions-ripple-effect-on-other-crops/
  37. https://www.treehugger.com/green-revolution-history-technologies-and-impact-5189596
  38. https://www.cimmyt.org/news/high-yielding-staple-crops-improve-health-and-prosperity-in-developing-countries/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8844509/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC33833/
  41. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.20263
  42. https://evolution.earthathome.org/grasses/diversity/
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-major-cereal-crops-in-the-Poaceae-their-taxonomic-classification-and-their-genome_tbl1_6510442
  44. https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/6443/GPWG%25202001%2520AMBG88.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  45. https://www.fao.org/3/CD3177EN/CD3177EN_cereals.pdf
  46. https://www.world-grain.com/articles/19577-fao-projects-record-2023-24-cereal-output
  47. https://vlsci.com/crops/cereals/
  48. https://www2.arpel.org/default.aspx/u51A4D/246519/BotanicalNamesOfCerealCrops.pdf
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10625233/
  50. http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/ericeproduction/0.5_Rice_races.htm
  51. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.857896/full
  52. https://evolution.earthathome.org/grasses/andropogoneae/maize-types/
  53. http://www.iita.org/cropsnew/maize/
  54. https://www.biologydiscussion.com/economic-botany/list-of-7-main-cereals-and-millets-economic-botany/56856
  55. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18404-w
  56. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/id/id-422.pdf
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225589454_Physiological_traits_and_cereal_germplasm_for_sustainable_agricultural_systems
  58. https://ripe.illinois.edu/blog/difference-between-c3-and-c4-plants
  59. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/photosynthesis-in-plants/photorespiration--c3-c4-cam-plants/a/c3-c4-and-cam-plants-agriculture
  60. https://www.pioneer.com/us/agronomy/c3-c4-photosynthesis-crop-production.html
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2737375/
  62. https://agcrops.osu.edu/newsletter/corn-newsletter/2020-04/vernalization-requirements-winter-wheat
  63. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/fall-wheat-emergence-and-the-vernalization-process
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6382010/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8657814/
  66. https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/72/4/1007/5936629
  67. https://www.feedstrategy.com/blogs/feed-ingredient-insights/blog/15673573/c3-vs-c4-cereals-and-their-effects-on-sustainability
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5033336/
  69. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/73281
  70. https://cropnuts.com/soil-preparation-for-maize-wheat-barley-production/
  71. https://www.echocommunity.org/en/resources/a003e741-5d52-466e-8bfa-075181616ff0
  72. https://agriculture.institute/agriculture-fundamentals/barley-cultivation-best-practices/
  73. https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/crops/climatic-requirements-for-field-crops/77211
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-requirements-of-rainfall-irrigation-temperature-sunshine-and-duration-of-growth_tbl3_325161015
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-74740-3
  76. https://njaes.rutgers.edu/fs1342/
  77. https://saiplatform.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/sai_platform_principles_practices_cereals.pdf
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378153941_Assessment_of_agricultural_land_suitability_for_cereal_crops_based_on_the_analysis_of_soil_physico-chemical_characteristics
  79. https://extension.umn.edu/corn-planting/planting-date-considerations-corn
  80. https://www.echocommunity.org/en/resources/bde5d9cd-6a0f-477b-8873-f003e17fae67
  81. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/profiles/truffin/articles/page1567712033496
  82. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=ag_ex_stpubs
  83. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/45195
  84. https://eos.com/blog/integrated-pest-management/
  85. https://www.fao.org/4/t1838e/t1838e0p.htm
  86. https://agriculture.institute/food-fundamentals-cpo/best-practices-harvesting-cereals-pulses-oilseeds/
  87. https://foodsafety.institute/food-fundamentals-chemistry/post-harvest-processing-cereals-field-to-table/
  88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713525001057
  89. https://www.gescaser.com/safe-storage/
  90. https://www.topcropmanager.com/practice-good-cereal-grain-storage-techniques-15940/
  91. https://www.fao.org/4/x5065e/x5065e04.htm
  92. https://www.cropscience.bayer.us/articles/bayer/post-harvest-grain-storage-management
  93. https://agriallis.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/STORAGE-TECHNIQUES-FOR-CEREAL-GRAINS.pdf
  94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313831252_Cereal_Storage_Techniques_A_Review
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5296677/
  96. https://www.ifpri.org/blog/fao-sofa-report-2019-new-insights-food-loss-and-waste/
  97. https://www.fao.org/4/w1544e/W1544E05.htm
  98. https://www.atlasbig.com/countries-total-cereal-production
  99. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.YLD.CREL.KG
  100. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/cereal_yield/
  101. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cereal-yield
  102. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/07/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2025-2034_3eb15914/full-report/cereals_251d1ece.html
  103. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-023-00913-8
  104. https://www.reportlinker.com/dataset/181672ddff346f851d0104b852c3aa57e288f97a
  105. https://www.ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/111501/EIB-290.pdf?v=11428
  106. https://www.amis-outlook.org/market-monitor
  107. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/commodity-trading-academy_top-3-cereals-shaping-global-trade-activity-7367141784151285761-Ip2X
  108. https://wikifarmer.com/library/en/article/global-cereal-market-2025-wheat-corn-and-rice-under-pressure-from-weather-and-trade-turbulence
  109. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8581
  110. https://millermagazine.com/blog/cereal-prices-fall-by-133-in-2024-marking-a-second-consecutive-annual-drop-5994
  111. https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2024/08/21/Why-cereal-prices-falling-and-what-it-means-for-manufacturers/
  112. https://millermagazine.com/blog/grain-market-in-2024-resilience-amid-turbulence-5973
  113. https://usafacts.org/articles/federal-farm-subsidies-what-data-says/
  114. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-sector-income-finances/farm-sector-income-forecast
  115. https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/cutting-federal-farm-subsidies
  116. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20210916STO12704/the-eu-common-agricultural-policy-its-reform-and-future-in-brief
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223000714
  118. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/international-markets-us-trade/countries-regions/european-union/common-agricultural-policy
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8110782/
  120. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/0534eca53121c137d3766a02320d0310-0430012022/related/Unfair-Advantage-Distortive-Subsidies-and-Their-Effects-on-Global-Trade-2023.pdf
  121. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/14-ag_01_e.htm
  122. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/ag_intro02_access_e.htm
  123. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/102980/ERR-304.pdf?v=13480
  124. https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/stop-the-dumping-how-eu-agricultural-subsidies-are-damaging-livelihoods-in-the-114605/
  125. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jespps/jes-06-2022-0362.html
  126. https://millermagazine.com/blog/us-tariffs-reshape-global-grain-trade-a-deepening-divide-6149
  127. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9196906/
  128. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/
  129. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400525/articles/aacc09_retailgrn.pdf
  130. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362813074_Cereal_Grains_Composition_Nutritional_Attributes_and_Potential_Applications
  131. https://www.myplate.gov/eat-healthy/grains
  132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6617089/
  133. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073352102400050X
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2675088/
  135. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/156482650002100418
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814616303806
  137. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1478155/full
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11988532/
  139. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Dietary_Guidelines_for_Americans_2020-2025.pdf
  140. https://foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/10457
  141. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4188247/
  142. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4908315/
  143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.115.021101
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11092208/
  145. https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2206
  146. https://www.bmj.com/content/382/bmj-2022-073939
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8321865/
  148. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165%2823%2905255-3/fulltext
  149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4596973/
  150. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2825%2901533-8/abstract
  151. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10375490/
  152. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/arsenic
  153. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165%2822%2910518-6/fulltext
  154. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40431420/
  155. https://www.seriouseats.com/guide-to-whole-grains-ancient-grains-gluten-free-types-of-grains
  156. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet
  157. https://traditionalcookingschool.com/food-preparation/grain-cooking-chart/
  158. http://gourmetvegetariankitchen.com/2017/01/09/traditional-ferment-cook-whole-grains/
  159. https://www.foodrenegade.com/nutritioncourse/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/RFNHLesson6Handout.pdf
  160. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bk-2011-1089.ch001
  161. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/AA20126H_Flours_Cereal_Grain.pdf
  162. https://www.kitchenaid.com/pinch-of-help/countertop-appliances/types-of-flour-and-their-uses.html
  163. https://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/packages/baking-guide/flour-101-guide-to-different-types-and-uses
  164. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/wheat-flour-market-106313
  165. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3774676/
  166. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/cereal-byproducts
  167. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-022-00589-6
  168. https://www.fao.org/4/x6930e/X6930E05.htm
  169. https://fefac.eu/newsroom/news/how-much-cereal-production-goes-to-feed-livestock/
  170. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377840116309099
  171. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/chart-detail?chartId=58346
  172. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/us-bioenergy-statistics
  173. https://www.ndethanol.org/national-ethanol-industry
  174. https://crespeldeitersgroup.com/applications-solutions/
  175. https://www.czapp.com/explainers/what-do-we-know-about-the-starch-industry/
  176. https://tereos.com/en/news/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-starch/
  177. https://projectblue.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Research%2520Papers/Cereals%2520and%2520Oilseed/pr450-final-project-report.pdf
  178. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.CREL.HA
  179. https://www.oieau.org/en/actualites/key-figure-of-the-week-water-footprint-for-cereal-production
  180. https://www.waterfootprint.org/resources/Report47-WaterFootprintCrops-Vol1.pdf
  181. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065211305870038
  182. https://www.cropnutrition.com/resource-library/understanding-fertilizer-and-its-essential-role-in-high-yielding-crops/
  183. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772801325000594
  184. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024EF005479
  185. https://eos.org/articles/rice-paddies-like-cows-spew-methane-a-new-variety-makes-them-a-lot-less-gassy
  186. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61690
  187. https://e360.yale.edu/digest/fertilizer-use-driving-rapid-rise-in-potent-nitrous-oxide-emissions
  188. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-023-02587-0
  189. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167880921003595
  190. http://blog.hoormansoilhealth.com/2018/02/are-usa-soil-erosion-rates-sustainable.html
  191. https://e360.yale.edu/digest/one-third-of-farmland-in-the-u-s-corn-belt-has-lost-its-topsoil
  192. https://www.wri.org/insights/causes-and-effects-soil-erosion-and-how-prevent-it
  193. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/our-global-food-system-primary-driver-biodiversity-loss
  194. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995
  195. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2610109/
  196. https://ourworldindata.org/yields-vs-land-use-how-has-the-world-produced-enough-food-for-a-growing-population
  197. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cereal-land-spared
  198. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0912953109
  199. https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/4/9/pgaf251/8245250
  200. https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2025/09/the-great-debate-over-the-best-way-to-protect-nature-land-sparing-or-land-sharing-may-be-a-draw/
  201. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2023.0216
  202. https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/rest/items/item_5035901_1/component/file_5035911/content
  203. https://www.aem.org/news/the-environmental-benefits-of-precision-agriculture-quantified
  204. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-53169-6
  205. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12530
  206. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5790416/
  207. https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/how-gmos-are-regulated-united-states
  208. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2022/01/21/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
  209. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38471133/
  210. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/food-genetically-modified
  211. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/23395/genetically-engineered-crops-experiences-and-prospects
  212. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6918800/
  213. https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-021-00578-9
  214. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4218791/
  215. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-65684-9
  216. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2682994/
  217. https://www.goldenrice.org/
  218. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2120901118
  219. https://allianceforscience.org/blog/2018/02/gmo-crops-increasing-yield-20-years-progress-ahead/
  220. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cereal-crop-yield-vs-fertilizer-application
  221. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908628/
  222. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4286047/
  223. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03650340.2021.1946040
  224. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308521X23001373
  225. https://www.organicresearchcentre.com/manage/authincludes/article_uploads/ORC121_Mind_the_gap.pdf
  226. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5
  227. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2019/10/22/organic-food-better-environment/
  228. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11069
  229. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308521X1100182X
  230. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17777595/
  231. https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/PHYTO-03-24-0105-PER
  232. https://www.ars.usda.gov/midwest-area/stpaul/cereal-disease-lab/docs/cereal-rusts/cereal-rusts/
  233. https://www.cropscience.bayer.us/articles/cp/if-southern-corn-leaf-blight-strikes
  234. https://www.cimmyt.org/news/the-cereals-imperative-of-future-food-systems/
  235. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332220300889
  236. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/agj2.21688
  237. https://eos.com/blog/monoculture-farming/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.