Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
A star is a luminous spheroid of plasma held together by self-gravity.[1] The nearest star to Earth is the Sun. Many other stars are visible to the naked eye at night; their immense distances from Earth make them appear as fixed points of light. The most prominent stars have been categorised into constellations and asterisms, and many of the brightest stars have proper names. Astronomers have assembled star catalogues that identify the known stars and provide standardized stellar designations. The observable universe contains an estimated 1022 to 1024 stars. Only about 4,000 of these stars are visible to the naked eye—all within the Milky Way galaxy.[2]
A star's life begins with the gravitational collapse of a gaseous nebula of material largely comprising hydrogen, helium, and traces of heavier elements. Its total mass mainly determines its evolution and eventual fate. A star shines for most of its active life due to the thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium in its core. This process releases energy that traverses the star's interior and radiates into outer space. At the end of a star's lifetime, fusion ceases and its core becomes a stellar remnant: a white dwarf, a neutron star, or—if it is sufficiently massive—a black hole.
Stellar nucleosynthesis in stars or their remnants creates almost all naturally occurring chemical elements heavier than lithium. Stellar mass loss or supernova explosions return chemically enriched material to the interstellar medium. These elements are then recycled into new stars. Astronomers can determine stellar properties—including mass, age, metallicity (chemical composition), variability, distance, and motion through space—by carrying out observations of a star's apparent brightness, spectrum, and changes in its position in the sky over time.
Stars can form orbital systems with other astronomical objects, as in planetary systems and star systems with two or more stars. When two such stars orbit closely, their gravitational interaction can significantly impact their evolution. Stars can form part of a much larger gravitationally bound structure, such as a star cluster or a galaxy.
Etymology
[edit]The English word star ultimately derives from the Proto-Indo-European root *h₂stḗr, also meaning 'star' – which is further analyzable as *h₂eh₁s- 'to burn' (also the source of the word ash) plus *-tēr (the agentive suffix). Its cognates in other languages include Latin stella, Greek aster, and German Stern;[3] further cognates in English include asterisk, asteroid, astral, constellation, and Esther.[4]
Observation history
[edit]
Historically, stars have been important to civilizations throughout the world. They have been part of religious practices, divination rituals, mythology, used for celestial navigation and orientation, to mark the passage of seasons, and to define calendars.
Early astronomers recognized a difference between "fixed stars", whose position on the celestial sphere does not change, and "wandering stars" (planets), which move noticeably relative to the fixed stars over days or weeks.[6] Many ancient astronomers believed that the stars were permanently affixed to a heavenly sphere and that they were immutable. By convention, astronomers grouped prominent stars into asterisms and constellations and used them to track the motions of the planets and the inferred position of the Sun.[7] The motion of the Sun against the background stars (and the horizon) was used to create calendars, which could be used to regulate agricultural practices.[8] The Gregorian calendar, currently used nearly everywhere in the world, is a solar calendar based on the angle of the Earth's rotational axis relative to its local star, the Sun.
The oldest accurately dated star chart was the result of ancient Egyptian astronomy in 1534 BC.[9] The earliest known star catalogues were compiled by the ancient Babylonian astronomers of Mesopotamia in the late 2nd millennium BC, during the Kassite Period (c. 1531 BC – c. 1155 BC).[10]

The first star catalogue in Greek astronomy was created by Aristillus in approximately 300 BC, with the help of Timocharis.[11] The star catalog of Hipparchus (2nd century BC) included 1,020 stars, and was used to assemble Ptolemy's star catalogue.[12] Hipparchus is known for the discovery of the first recorded nova (new star).[13] Many of the constellations and star names in use today derive from Greek astronomy.
Despite the apparent immutability of the heavens, Chinese astronomers were aware that new stars could appear.[14] In 185 AD, they were the first to observe and write about a supernova, now known as SN 185.[15] The brightest stellar event in recorded history was the SN 1006 supernova, which was observed in 1006 and written about by the Egyptian astronomer Ali ibn Ridwan and several Chinese astronomers.[16] The SN 1054 supernova, which gave birth to the Crab Nebula, was also observed by Chinese and Islamic astronomers.[17][18][19]
Medieval Islamic astronomers gave Arabic names to many stars that are still used today and they invented numerous astronomical instruments that could compute the positions of the stars. They built the first large observatory research institutes, mainly to produce Zij star catalogues.[20] Among these, the Book of Fixed Stars (964) was written by the Persian astronomer Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi, who observed a number of stars, star clusters (including the Omicron Velorum and Brocchi's Clusters) and galaxies (including the Andromeda Galaxy).[21] According to A. Zahoor, in the 11th century, the Persian polymath scholar Abu Rayhan Biruni described the Milky Way galaxy as a multitude of fragments having the properties of nebulous stars, and gave the latitudes of various stars during a lunar eclipse in 1019.[22]
According to Josep Puig, the Andalusian astronomer Ibn Bajjah proposed that the Milky Way was made up of many stars that almost touched one another and appeared to be a continuous image due to the effect of refraction from sublunary material, citing his observation of the conjunction of Jupiter and Mars on 500 AH (1106/1107 AD) as evidence.[23] Early European astronomers such as Tycho Brahe identified new stars in the night sky (later termed novae), suggesting that the heavens were not immutable. In 1584, Giordano Bruno suggested that the stars were like the Sun, and may have other planets, possibly even Earth-like, in orbit around them,[24] an idea that had been suggested earlier by the ancient Greek philosophers, Democritus and Epicurus,[25] and by medieval Islamic cosmologists[26] such as Fakhr al-Din al-Razi.[27] By the following century, the idea of the stars being the same as the Sun was reaching a consensus among astronomers. To explain why these stars exerted no net gravitational pull on the Solar System, Isaac Newton suggested that the stars were equally distributed in every direction, an idea prompted by the theologian Richard Bentley.[28]
The Italian astronomer Geminiano Montanari recorded observing variations in luminosity of the star Algol in 1667. Edmond Halley published the first measurements of the proper motion of a pair of nearby "fixed" stars, demonstrating that they had changed positions since the time of the ancient Greek astronomers Ptolemy and Hipparchus.[24]
William Herschel was the first astronomer to attempt to determine the distribution of stars in the sky. During the 1780s, he established a series of gauges in 600 directions and counted the stars observed along each line of sight. From this, he deduced that the number of stars steadily increased toward one side of the sky, in the direction of the Milky Way core. His son John Herschel repeated this study in the southern hemisphere and found a corresponding increase in the same direction.[29] In addition to his other accomplishments, William Herschel is noted for his discovery that some stars do not merely lie along the same line of sight, but are physical companions that form binary star systems.[30]
The science of stellar spectroscopy was pioneered by Joseph von Fraunhofer and Angelo Secchi. By comparing the spectra of stars such as Sirius to the Sun, they found differences in the strength and number of their absorption lines—the dark lines in stellar spectra caused by the atmosphere's absorption of specific frequencies. In 1865, Secchi began classifying stars into spectral types.[31] The modern version of the stellar classification scheme was developed by Annie J. Cannon during the early 1900s.[32]
The first direct measurement of the distance to a star (61 Cygni at 11.4 light-years) was made in 1838 by Friedrich Bessel using the parallax technique. Parallax measurements demonstrated the vast separation of the stars in the heavens.[24] Observation of double stars gained increasing importance during the 19th century. In 1834, Friedrich Bessel observed changes in the proper motion of the star Sirius and inferred a hidden companion. Edward Pickering discovered the first spectroscopic binary in 1899 when he observed the periodic splitting of the spectral lines of the star Mizar in a 104-day period. Detailed observations of many binary star systems were collected by astronomers such as Friedrich Georg Wilhelm von Struve and S. W. Burnham, allowing the masses of stars to be determined from computation of orbital elements. The first solution to the problem of deriving an orbit of binary stars from telescope observations was made by Felix Savary in 1827.[33]
The twentieth century saw increasingly rapid advances in the scientific study of stars. The photograph became a valuable astronomical tool. Karl Schwarzschild discovered that the color of a star and, hence, its temperature, could be determined by comparing the visual magnitude against the photographic magnitude. The development of the photoelectric photometer allowed precise measurements of magnitude at multiple wavelength intervals. In 1921 Albert A. Michelson made the first measurements of a stellar diameter using an interferometer on the Hooker telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory.[34]
Important theoretical work on the physical structure of stars occurred during the first decades of the twentieth century. In 1913, the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram was developed, propelling the astrophysical study of stars. Successful models were developed to explain the interiors of stars and stellar evolution. Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin first proposed that stars were made primarily of hydrogen and helium in her 1925 PhD thesis.[35] The spectra of stars were further understood through advances in quantum physics. This allowed the chemical composition of the stellar atmosphere to be determined.[36]

With the exception of rare events such as supernovae and supernova impostors, individual stars have primarily been observed in the Local Group,[37] and especially in the visible part of the Milky Way (as demonstrated by the detailed star catalogues available for the Milky Way galaxy) and its satellites.[38] Individual stars such as Cepheid variables have been observed in the M87[39] and M100 galaxies of the Virgo Cluster,[40] as well as luminous stars in some other relatively nearby galaxies.[41] With the aid of gravitational lensing, a single star (named Icarus) has been observed at 9 billion light-years away.[42][43]
Designations
[edit]The concept of a constellation was known to exist during the Babylonian period. Ancient sky watchers imagined that prominent arrangements of stars formed patterns, and they associated these with particular aspects of nature or their myths. Twelve of these formations lay along the band of the ecliptic and these became the basis of astrology.[44] Many of the more prominent individual stars were given names, particularly with Arabic or Latin designations.
As well as certain constellations and the Sun itself, individual stars have their own myths.[45] To the Ancient Greeks, some "stars", known as planets (Greek πλανήτης (planētēs), meaning "wanderer"), represented various important deities, from which the names of the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were taken.[45] (Uranus and Neptune were Greek and Roman gods, but neither planet was known in Antiquity because of their low brightness. Their names were assigned by later astronomers.)
Circa 1600, the names of the constellations were used to name the stars in the corresponding regions of the sky. The German astronomer Johann Bayer created a series of star maps and applied Greek letters as designations to the stars in each constellation. Later a numbering system based on the star's right ascension was invented and added to John Flamsteed's star catalogue in his book "Historia coelestis Britannica" (the 1712 edition), whereby this numbering system came to be called Flamsteed designation or Flamsteed numbering.[46][47]
The internationally recognized authority for naming celestial bodies is the International Astronomical Union (IAU).[48] The International Astronomical Union maintains the Working Group on Star Names (WGSN)[49] which catalogs and standardizes proper names for stars.[50] A number of private companies sell names of stars which are not recognized by the IAU, professional astronomers, or the amateur astronomy community.[51] The British Library calls this an unregulated commercial enterprise,[52][53] and the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection issued a violation against one such star-naming company for engaging in a deceptive trade practice.[54][55]
Units of measurement
[edit]Although stellar parameters can be expressed in SI units or Gaussian units, it is often most convenient to express mass, luminosity, and radii in solar units, based on the characteristics of the Sun. In 2015, the IAU defined a set of nominal solar values (defined as SI constants, without uncertainties) which can be used for quoting stellar parameters:
nominal solar luminosity L☉ = 3.828×1026 W[56] nominal solar radius R☉ = 6.957×108 m[56]
The solar mass M☉ was not explicitly defined by the IAU due to the large relative uncertainty (10−4) of the Newtonian constant of gravitation G. Since the product of the Newtonian constant of gravitation and solar mass together (GM☉) has been determined to much greater precision, the IAU defined the nominal solar mass parameter to be:
nominal solar mass parameter: GM☉ = 1.3271244×1020 m3/s2[56]
The nominal solar mass parameter can be combined with the most recent (2014) CODATA estimate of the Newtonian constant of gravitation G to derive the solar mass to be approximately 1.9885×1030 kg. Although the exact values for the luminosity, radius, mass parameter, and mass may vary slightly in the future due to observational uncertainties, the 2015 IAU nominal constants will remain the same SI values as they remain useful measures for quoting stellar parameters.
Large lengths, such as the radius of a giant star or the semi-major axis of a binary star system, are often expressed in terms of the astronomical unit—approximately equal to the mean distance between the Earth and the Sun (150 million km or approximately 93 million miles). In 2012, the IAU defined the astronomical constant to be an exact length in meters: 149,597,870,700 m.[56]
Formation and evolution
[edit]Stars condense from regions of space of higher matter density, yet those regions are less dense than within a vacuum chamber. These regions—known as molecular clouds—consist mostly of hydrogen, with about 23 to 28 percent helium and a few percent heavier elements. One example of such a star-forming region is the Orion Nebula.[57] Most stars form in groups of dozens to hundreds of thousands of stars.[58] Massive stars in these groups may powerfully illuminate those clouds, ionizing the hydrogen, and creating H II regions. Such feedback effects, from star formation, may ultimately disrupt the cloud and prevent further star formation.[59] All stars spend the majority of their existence as main-sequence stars, fueled primarily by the nuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium within their cores. However, stars of different masses have markedly different properties at various stages of their development. The ultimate fate of more massive stars differs from that of less massive stars, as do their luminosities and the impact they have on their environment. Accordingly, astronomers often group stars by their mass:[60]
- Very low mass stars, with masses below 0.5 M☉, are fully convective and distribute helium evenly throughout the whole star while on the main sequence. Therefore, they never undergo shell burning and never become red giants. After exhausting their hydrogen they become helium white dwarfs and slowly cool.[61] As the lifetime of 0.5 M☉ stars is longer than the age of the universe, no such star has yet reached the white dwarf stage.
- Low mass stars (including the Sun), with a mass between 0.5 M☉ and ~2.25 M☉ depending on composition, do become red giants as their core hydrogen is depleted and they begin to burn helium in core in a helium flash; they develop a degenerate carbon-oxygen core later on the asymptotic giant branch; they finally blow off their outer shell as a planetary nebula and leave behind their core in the form of a white dwarf.[62][63]
- Intermediate-mass stars, between ~2.25 M☉ and ~8 M☉, pass through evolutionary stages similar to low mass stars, but after a relatively short period on the red-giant branch they ignite helium without a flash and spend an extended period in the red clump before forming a degenerate carbon-oxygen core.[62][63]
- Massive stars generally have a minimum mass of ~8 M☉.[64] After exhausting the hydrogen at the core these stars become supergiants and go on to fuse elements heavier than helium. Many end their lives when their cores collapse and they explode as supernovae.[62][65]
Star formation
[edit]The formation of a star begins with gravitational instability within a molecular cloud, caused by regions of higher density—often triggered by compression of clouds by radiation from massive stars, expanding bubbles in the interstellar medium, the collision of different molecular clouds, or the collision of galaxies (as in a starburst galaxy).[66][67] When a region reaches a sufficient density of matter to satisfy the criteria for Jeans instability, it begins to collapse under its own gravitational force.[68]
As the cloud collapses, individual conglomerations of dense dust and gas form "Bok globules". As a globule collapses and the density increases, the gravitational energy converts into heat and the temperature rises. When the protostellar cloud has approximately reached the stable condition of hydrostatic equilibrium, a protostar forms at the core.[69] These pre-main-sequence stars are often surrounded by a protoplanetary disk and powered mainly by the conversion of gravitational energy. The period of gravitational contraction lasts about 10 million years for a star like the sun, up to 100 million years for a red dwarf.[70]
Early stars of less than 2 M☉ are called T Tauri stars, while those with greater mass are Herbig Ae/Be stars. These newly formed stars emit jets of gas along their axis of rotation, which may reduce the angular momentum of the collapsing star and result in small patches of nebulosity known as Herbig–Haro objects.[71][72] These jets, in combination with radiation from nearby massive stars, may help to drive away the surrounding cloud from which the star was formed.[73]
Early in their development, T Tauri stars follow the Hayashi track—they contract and decrease in luminosity while remaining at roughly the same temperature. Less massive T Tauri stars follow this track to the main sequence, while more massive stars turn onto the Henyey track.[74]
Most stars are observed to be members of binary star systems, and the properties of those binaries are the result of the conditions in which they formed.[75] A gas cloud must lose its angular momentum in order to collapse and form a star. The fragmentation of the cloud into multiple stars distributes some of that angular momentum. The primordial binaries transfer some angular momentum by gravitational interactions during close encounters with other stars in young stellar clusters. These interactions tend to split apart more widely separated (soft) binaries while causing hard binaries to become more tightly bound. This produces the separation of binaries into their two observed populations distributions.[76]
Main sequence
[edit]Stars spend about 90% of their lifetimes fusing hydrogen into helium in high-temperature-and-pressure reactions in their cores. Such stars are said to be on the main sequence and are called dwarf stars. Starting at zero-age main sequence, the proportion of helium in a star's core will steadily increase, the rate of nuclear fusion at the core will slowly increase, as will the star's temperature and luminosity.[77] The Sun, for example, is estimated to have increased in luminosity by about 40% since it reached the main sequence 4.6 billion (4.6×109) years ago.[78]
Every star generates a stellar wind of particles that causes a continual outflow of gas into space. For most stars, the mass lost is negligible. The Sun loses 10−14 M☉ every year,[79] or about 0.01% of its total mass over its entire lifespan. However, very massive stars can lose 10−7 to 10−5 M☉ each year, significantly affecting their evolution.[80] Stars that begin with more than 50 M☉ can lose over half their total mass while on the main sequence.[81]

The time a star spends on the main sequence depends primarily on the amount of fuel it has and the rate at which it fuses it. The Sun is expected to live 10 billion (1010) years. Massive stars consume their fuel very rapidly and are short-lived. Low mass stars consume their fuel very slowly. Stars less massive than 0.25 M☉, called red dwarfs, are able to fuse nearly all of their mass while stars of about 1 M☉ can only fuse about 10% of their mass. The combination of their slow fuel-consumption and relatively large usable fuel supply allows low mass stars to last about one trillion (10×1012) years; the most extreme of 0.08 M☉ will last for about 12 trillion years. Red dwarfs become hotter and more luminous as they accumulate helium. When they eventually run out of hydrogen, they contract into a white dwarf and decline in temperature.[61] Since the lifespan of such stars is greater than the current age of the universe (13.8 billion years), no stars under about 0.85 M☉[82] are expected to have moved off the main sequence.
Besides mass, the elements heavier than helium can play a significant role in the evolution of stars. Astronomers label all elements heavier than helium "metals", and call the chemical concentration of these elements in a star, its metallicity. A star's metallicity can influence the time the star takes to burn its fuel, and controls the formation of its magnetic fields,[83] which affects the strength of its stellar wind.[84] Older, population II stars have substantially less metallicity than the younger, population I stars due to the composition of the molecular clouds from which they formed. Over time, such clouds become increasingly enriched in heavier elements as older stars die and shed portions of their atmospheres.[85]
Post–main sequence
[edit]
As stars of at least 0.4 M☉[86] exhaust the supply of hydrogen at their core, they start to fuse hydrogen in a shell surrounding the helium core. The outer layers of the star expand and cool greatly as they transition into a red giant. In some cases, they will fuse heavier elements at the core or in shells around the core. As the stars expand, they throw part of their mass, enriched with those heavier elements, into the interstellar environment, to be recycled later as new stars.[87] In about 5 billion years, when the Sun enters the helium burning phase, it will expand to a maximum radius of roughly 1 astronomical unit (150 million kilometres), 250 times its present size, and lose 30% of its current mass.[78][88]
As the hydrogen-burning shell produces more helium, the core increases in mass and temperature. In a red giant of up to 2.25 M☉, the mass of the helium core becomes degenerate prior to helium fusion. Finally, when the temperature increases sufficiently, core helium fusion begins explosively in what is called a helium flash, and the star rapidly shrinks in radius, increases its surface temperature, and moves to the horizontal branch of the HR diagram. For more massive stars, helium core fusion starts before the core becomes degenerate, and the star spends some time in the red clump, slowly burning helium, before the outer convective envelope collapses and the star then moves to the horizontal branch.[89]
After a star has fused the helium of its core, it begins fusing helium along a shell surrounding the hot carbon core. The star then follows an evolutionary path called the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) that parallels the other described red-giant phase, but with a higher luminosity. The more massive AGB stars may undergo a brief period of carbon fusion before the core becomes degenerate. During the AGB phase, stars undergo thermal pulses due to instabilities in the core of the star. In these thermal pulses, the luminosity of the star varies and matter is ejected from the star's atmosphere, ultimately forming a planetary nebula. As much as 50 to 70% of a star's mass can be ejected in this mass loss process. Because energy transport in an AGB star is primarily by convection, this ejected material is enriched with the fusion products dredged up from the core. Therefore, the planetary nebula is enriched with elements like carbon and oxygen. Ultimately, the planetary nebula disperses, enriching the general interstellar medium.[90] Therefore, future generations of stars are made of the "star stuff" from past stars.[91]
Massive stars
[edit]
During their helium-burning phase, a star of more than 9 solar masses expands to form first a blue supergiant and then a red supergiant. Particularly massive stars (exceeding 40 solar masses, like Alnilam, the central blue supergiant of Orion's Belt)[92] do not become red supergiants due to high mass loss.[93] These may instead evolve to a Wolf–Rayet star, characterised by spectra dominated by emission lines of elements heavier than hydrogen, which have reached the surface due to strong convection and intense mass loss, or from stripping of the outer layers.[94]
When helium is exhausted at the core of a massive star, the core contracts and the temperature and pressure rises enough to fuse carbon (see Carbon-burning process). This process continues, with the successive stages being fueled by neon (see neon-burning process), oxygen (see oxygen-burning process), and silicon (see silicon-burning process). Near the end of the star's life, fusion continues along a series of onion-layer shells within a massive star. Each shell fuses a different element, with the outermost shell fusing hydrogen; the next shell fusing helium, and so forth.[95]
The final stage occurs when a massive star begins producing iron. Since iron nuclei are more tightly bound than any heavier nuclei, any fusion beyond iron does not produce a net release of energy.[96]
Some massive stars, particularly luminous blue variables, are very unstable to the extent that they violently shed their mass into space in events known as supernova impostors, becoming significantly brighter in the process. Eta Carinae is known for having undergone a supernova impostor event, the Great Eruption, in the 19th century.
Collapse
[edit]As a star's core shrinks, the intensity of radiation from that surface increases, creating such radiation pressure on the outer shell of gas that it will push those layers away, forming a planetary nebula. If what remains after the outer atmosphere has been shed is less than roughly 1.4 M☉, it shrinks to a relatively tiny object about the size of Earth, known as a white dwarf. White dwarfs lack the mass for further gravitational compression to take place.[97] The electron-degenerate matter inside a white dwarf is no longer a plasma. Eventually, white dwarfs fade into black dwarfs over a very long period of time.[98]

In massive stars, fusion continues until the iron core has grown so large (more than 1.4 M☉) that it can no longer support its own mass. This core will suddenly collapse as its electrons are driven into its protons, forming neutrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays in a burst of electron capture and inverse beta decay. The shockwave formed by this sudden collapse causes the rest of the star to explode in a supernova. Supernovae become so bright that they may briefly outshine the star's entire home galaxy. When they occur within the Milky Way, supernovae have historically been observed by naked-eye observers as "new stars" where none seemingly existed before.[99]
A supernova explosion blows away the star's outer layers, leaving a remnant such as the Crab Nebula.[99] The core is compressed into a neutron star, which sometimes manifests itself as a pulsar or X-ray burster. In the case of the largest stars, the remnant is a black hole greater than 4 M☉.[100] In a neutron star the matter is in a state known as neutron-degenerate matter, with a more exotic form of degenerate matter, QCD matter, possibly present in the core.[101]
The blown-off outer layers of dying stars include heavy elements, which may be recycled during the formation of new stars. These heavy elements allow the formation of rocky planets. The outflow from supernovae and the stellar wind of large stars play an important part in shaping the interstellar medium.[99]
Binary stars
[edit]Binary stars' evolution may significantly differ from that of single stars of the same mass. For example, when any star expands to become a red giant, it may overflow its Roche lobe, the surrounding region where material is gravitationally bound to it; if stars in a binary system are close enough, some of that material may overflow to the other star, yielding phenomena including contact binaries, common-envelope binaries, cataclysmic variables, blue stragglers,[102] and type Ia supernovae. Mass transfer leads to cases such as the Algol paradox, where the most-evolved star in a system is the least massive.[103]
The evolution of binary star and higher-order star systems is intensely researched since so many stars have been found to be members of binary systems. Around half of Sun-like stars, and an even higher proportion of more massive stars, form in multiple systems, and this may greatly influence such phenomena as novae and supernovae, the formation of certain types of star, and the enrichment of space with nucleosynthesis products.[104]
The influence of binary star evolution on the formation of evolved massive stars such as luminous blue variables, Wolf–Rayet stars, and the progenitors of certain classes of core collapse supernova is still disputed. Single massive stars may be unable to expel their outer layers fast enough to form the types and numbers of evolved stars that are observed, or to produce progenitors that would explode as the supernovae that are observed. Mass transfer through gravitational stripping in binary systems is seen by some astronomers as the solution to that problem.[105][106][107]
Distribution
[edit]
Stars are not spread uniformly across the universe but are normally grouped into galaxies along with interstellar gas and dust. A typical large galaxy like the Milky Way contains hundreds of billions of stars. There are more than 2 trillion (1012) galaxies, though most are less than 10% the mass of the Milky Way.[108] Overall, there are likely to be between 1022 and 1024 stars,[109][110] which are more stars than all the grains of sand on planet Earth.[111][112][113] Most stars are within galaxies, but between 10 and 50% of the starlight in large galaxy clusters may come from stars outside of any galaxy.[114][115][116]
A multi-star system consists of two or more gravitationally bound stars that orbit each other. The simplest and most common multi-star system is a binary star, but systems of three or more stars exist. For reasons of orbital stability, such multi-star systems are often organized into hierarchical sets of binary stars.[117] Larger groups are called star clusters. These range from loose stellar associations with only a few stars to open clusters with dozens to thousands of stars, up to enormous globular clusters with hundreds of thousands of stars. Such systems orbit their host galaxy. The stars in an open or globular cluster all formed from the same giant molecular cloud, so all members normally have similar ages and compositions.[90]
Many stars are observed, and most or all may have originally formed in gravitationally bound, multiple-star systems. This is particularly true for very massive O and B class stars, 80% of which are believed to be part of multiple-star systems. The proportion of single star systems increases with decreasing star mass, so that only 25% of red dwarfs are known to have stellar companions. As 85% of all stars are red dwarfs, more than two thirds of stars in the Milky Way are likely single red dwarfs.[118] In a 2017 study of the Perseus molecular cloud, astronomers found that most of the newly formed stars are in binary systems. In the model that best explained the data, all stars initially formed as binaries, though some binaries later split up and leave single stars behind.[119][120]

The nearest star to the Earth, apart from the Sun, is Proxima Centauri, 4.2465 light-years (40.175 trillion kilometres) away. Travelling at the orbital speed of the Space Shuttle, 8 kilometres per second (29,000 kilometres per hour), it would take about 150,000 years to arrive.[121] This is typical of stellar separations in galactic discs.[122] Stars can be much closer to each other in the centres of galaxies[123] and in globular clusters,[124] or much farther apart in galactic halos.[125]
Due to the relatively vast distances between stars outside the galactic nucleus, collisions between stars are thought to be rare. In denser regions such as the core of globular clusters or the galactic center, collisions can be more common.[126] Such collisions can produce what are known as blue stragglers. These abnormal stars have higher surface temperatures and thus are bluer than stars at the main sequence turnoff in the cluster to which they belong; in standard stellar evolution, blue stragglers would already have evolved off the main sequence and thus would not be seen in the cluster.[127]
Characteristics
[edit]Almost everything about a star is determined by its initial mass, including such characteristics as luminosity, size, evolution, lifespan, and its eventual fate.
Age
[edit]Most stars are between 1 billion and 10 billion years old. Some stars may even be close to 13.8 billion years old—the observed age of the universe. The oldest star yet discovered, HD 140283, nicknamed Methuselah star, is an estimated 14.46 ± 0.8 billion years old.[128] (Due to the uncertainty in the value, this age for the star does not conflict with the age of the universe, determined by the Planck satellite as 13.799 ± 0.021).[128][129]
The more massive the star, the shorter its lifespan, primarily because massive stars have greater pressure on their cores, causing them to burn hydrogen more rapidly. The most massive stars last an average of a few million years, while stars of minimum mass (red dwarfs) burn their fuel very slowly and can last tens to hundreds of billions of years.[130][131]
| Initial Mass (M☉) | Main Sequence | Subgiant | First Red Giant | Core He Burning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 9.33 | 2.57 | 0.76 | 0.13 |
| 1.6 | 2.28 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| 2.0 | 1.20 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.28 |
| 5.0 | 0.10 | 0.0004 | 0.0003 | 0.02 |
Chemical composition
[edit]When stars form in the present Milky Way galaxy, they are composed of about 71% hydrogen and 27% helium,[133] as measured by mass, with a small fraction of heavier elements. Typically the portion of heavy elements is measured in terms of the iron content of the stellar atmosphere, as iron is a common element and its absorption lines are relatively easy to measure. The portion of heavier elements may be an indicator of the likelihood that the star has a planetary system.[134]
As of 2005[update] the star with the lowest iron content ever measured is the dwarf HE1327-2326, with only 1/200,000th the iron content of the Sun.[135] By contrast, the super-metal-rich star μ Leonis has nearly double the abundance of iron as the Sun, while the planet-bearing star 14 Herculis has nearly triple the iron.[136] Chemically peculiar stars show unusual abundances of certain elements in their spectrum; especially chromium and rare earth elements.[137] Stars with cooler outer atmospheres, including the Sun, can form various diatomic and polyatomic molecules.[138]

Diameter
[edit]Due to their great distance from the Earth, all stars except the Sun appear to the unaided eye as shining points in the night sky that twinkle because of the effect of the Earth's atmosphere. The Sun is close enough to the Earth to appear as a disk instead, and to provide daylight. Other than the Sun, the star with the largest apparent size is R Doradus, with an angular diameter of only 0.057 arcseconds.[139]
The disks of most stars are much too small in angular size to be observed with current ground-based optical telescopes, so interferometer telescopes are required to produce images of these objects. Another technique for measuring the angular size of stars is through occultation. By precisely measuring the drop in brightness of a star as it is occulted by the Moon (or the rise in brightness when it reappears), the star's angular diameter can be computed.[140]
Stars range in size from neutron stars, which vary anywhere from 20 to 40 km (25 mi) in diameter, to supergiants like Betelgeuse in the Orion constellation, which has a diameter about 640 times that of the Sun[141] with a much lower density.[142]
Kinematics
[edit]
The motion of a star relative to the Sun can provide useful information about the origin and age of a star, as well as the structure and evolution of the surrounding galaxy.[144] The components of motion of a star consist of the radial velocity toward or away from the Sun, and the traverse angular movement, which is called its proper motion.[145]
Radial velocity is measured by the doppler shift of the star's spectral lines and is given in units of km/s. The proper motion of a star, its parallax, is determined by precise astrometric measurements in units of milli-arc seconds (mas) per year. With knowledge of the star's parallax and its distance, the proper motion velocity can be calculated. Together with the radial velocity, the total velocity can be calculated. Stars with high rates of proper motion are likely to be relatively close to the Sun, making them good candidates for parallax measurements.[146]
When both rates of movement are known, the space velocity of the star relative to the Sun or the galaxy can be computed. Among nearby stars, it has been found that younger population I stars have generally lower velocities than older, population II stars. The latter have elliptical orbits that are inclined to the plane of the galaxy.[147] A comparison of the kinematics of nearby stars has allowed astronomers to trace their origin to common points in giant molecular clouds; such groups with common points of origin are referred to as stellar associations.[148]
Magnetic field
[edit]
The magnetic field of a star is generated within regions of the interior where convective circulation occurs. This movement of conductive plasma functions like a dynamo, wherein the movement of electrical charges induce magnetic fields, as does a mechanical dynamo. Those magnetic fields have a great range that extend throughout and beyond the star. The strength of the magnetic field varies with the mass and composition of the star, and the amount of magnetic surface activity depends upon the star's rate of rotation. This surface activity produces starspots, which are regions of strong magnetic fields and lower than normal surface temperatures. Coronal loops are arching magnetic field flux lines that rise from a star's surface into the star's outer atmosphere, its corona. The coronal loops can be seen due to the plasma they conduct along their length. Stellar flares are bursts of high-energy particles that are emitted due to the same magnetic activity.[149]
Young, rapidly rotating stars tend to have high levels of surface activity because of their magnetic field. The magnetic field can act upon a star's stellar wind, functioning as a brake to gradually slow the rate of rotation with time. Thus, older stars such as the Sun have a much slower rate of rotation and a lower level of surface activity. The activity levels of slowly rotating stars tend to vary in a cyclical manner and can shut down altogether for periods of time.[150] During the Maunder Minimum, for example, the Sun underwent a 70-year period with almost no sunspot activity.[151]
Mass
[edit]Stars have masses ranging from less than half the solar mass to over 200 solar masses (see List of most massive stars). One of the most massive stars known is Eta Carinae,[152] which, with 100–150 times as much mass as the Sun, will have a lifespan of only several million years. Studies of the most massive open clusters suggests 150 M☉ as a rough upper limit for stars in the current era of the universe.[153] This represents an empirical value for the theoretical limit on the mass of forming stars due to increasing radiation pressure on the accreting gas cloud. Several stars in the R136 cluster in the Large Magellanic Cloud have been measured with larger masses,[154] but it has been determined that they could have been created through the collision and merger of massive stars in close binary systems, sidestepping the 150 M☉ limit on massive star formation.[155]

The first stars to form after the Big Bang may have been larger, up to 300 M☉,[156] due to the complete absence of elements heavier than lithium in their composition. This generation of supermassive population III stars is likely to have existed in the very early universe (i.e., they are observed to have a high redshift), and may have started the production of chemical elements heavier than hydrogen that are needed for the later formation of planets and life. In June 2015, astronomers reported evidence for Population III stars in the Cosmos Redshift 7 galaxy at z = 6.60.[157][158]
With a mass only 80 times that of Jupiter (MJ), 2MASS J0523-1403 is the smallest known star undergoing nuclear fusion in its core.[159] For stars with metallicity similar to the Sun, the theoretical minimum mass the star can have and still undergo fusion at the core, is estimated to be about 75 MJ.[160][161] When the metallicity is very low, the minimum star size seems to be about 8.3% of the solar mass, or about 87 MJ.[161][162] Smaller bodies called brown dwarfs, occupy a poorly defined grey area between stars and gas giants.[160][161]
The combination of the radius and the mass of a star determines its surface gravity. Giant stars have much lower surface gravity than do main-sequence stars, while the opposite is the case for degenerate, compact stars such as white dwarfs. The surface gravity can influence the appearance of a star's spectrum, with higher gravity causing a broadening of the absorption lines.[36]
Rotation
[edit]The rotation rate of stars can be determined through spectroscopic measurement, or more exactly determined by tracking their starspots. Young stars can have a rotation greater than 100 km/s at the equator. The B-class star Achernar, for example, has an equatorial velocity of about 225 km/s or greater, causing its equator to bulge outward and giving it an equatorial diameter that is more than 50% greater than between the poles. This rate of rotation is just below the critical velocity of 300 km/s at which speed the star would break apart.[163] By contrast, the Sun rotates once every 25–35 days depending on latitude,[164] with an equatorial velocity of 1.93 km/s.[165] A main-sequence star's magnetic field and the stellar wind serve to slow its rotation by a significant amount as it evolves on the main sequence.[166]
Degenerate stars have contracted into a compact mass, resulting in a rapid rate of rotation. However they have relatively low rates of rotation compared to what would be expected by conservation of angular momentum—the tendency of a rotating body to compensate for a contraction in size by increasing its rate of spin. A large portion of the star's angular momentum is dissipated as a result of mass loss through the stellar wind.[167] In spite of this, the rate of rotation for a pulsar can be very rapid. The pulsar at the heart of the Crab nebula, for example, rotates 30 times per second.[168] The rotation rate of the pulsar will gradually slow due to the emission of radiation.[169]
Temperature
[edit]The surface temperature of a main-sequence star is determined by the rate of energy production of its core and by its radius, and is often estimated from the star's color index.[170] The temperature is normally given in terms of an effective temperature, which is the temperature of an idealized black body that radiates its energy at the same luminosity per surface area as the star. The effective temperature is only representative of the surface, as the temperature increases toward the core.[171] The temperature in the core region of a star is several million kelvins.[172]
The stellar temperature will determine the rate of ionization of various elements, resulting in characteristic absorption lines in the spectrum. The surface temperature of a star, along with its visual absolute magnitude and absorption features, is used to classify a star (see classification below).[36]
Massive main-sequence stars can have surface temperatures of 50,000 K. Smaller stars such as the Sun have surface temperatures of a few thousand K. Red giants have relatively low surface temperatures of about 3,600 K; but they have a high luminosity due to their large exterior surface area.[173]
Radiation
[edit]
The energy produced by stars, a product of nuclear fusion, radiates to space as both electromagnetic radiation and particle radiation. The particle radiation emitted by a star is manifested as the stellar wind,[174] which streams from the outer layers as electrically charged protons and alpha and beta particles. A steady stream of almost massless neutrinos emanate directly from the star's core.[175]
The production of energy at the core is the reason stars shine so brightly: every time two or more atomic nuclei fuse together to form a single atomic nucleus of a new heavier element, gamma ray photons are released from the nuclear fusion product. This energy is converted to other forms of electromagnetic energy of lower frequency, such as visible light, by the time it reaches the star's outer layers.[176]
The color of a star, as determined by the most intense frequency of the visible light, depends on the temperature of the star's outer layers, including its photosphere.[177] Besides visible light, stars emit forms of electromagnetic radiation that are invisible to the human eye. In fact, stellar electromagnetic radiation spans the entire electromagnetic spectrum, from the longest wavelengths of radio waves through infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, to the shortest of X-rays, and gamma rays. From the standpoint of total energy emitted by a star, not all components of stellar electromagnetic radiation are significant, but all frequencies provide insight into the star's physics.[175]
Using the stellar spectrum, astronomers can determine the surface temperature, surface gravity, metallicity and rotational velocity of a star. If the distance of the star is found, such as by measuring the parallax, then the luminosity of the star can be derived. The mass, radius, surface gravity, and rotation period can then be estimated based on stellar models. (Mass can be calculated for stars in binary systems by measuring their orbital velocities and distances. Gravitational microlensing has been used to measure the mass of a single star.[178]) With these parameters, astronomers can estimate the age of the star.[179]
Luminosity
[edit]The luminosity of a star is the amount of light and other forms of radiant energy it radiates per unit of time. It has units of power. The luminosity of a star is determined by its radius and surface temperature. Many stars do not radiate uniformly across their entire surface. The rapidly rotating star Vega, for example, has a higher energy flux (power per unit area) at its poles than along its equator.[180]
Patches of the star's surface with a lower temperature and luminosity than average are known as starspots. Small, dwarf stars such as the Sun generally have essentially featureless disks with only small starspots. Giant stars have much larger, more obvious starspots,[150] and they exhibit strong stellar limb darkening. That is, the brightness decreases towards the edge of the stellar disk.[181] Red dwarf flare stars such as UV Ceti may possess prominent starspot features.[182]
Magnitude
[edit]The apparent brightness of a star is expressed in terms of its apparent magnitude. It is a function of the star's luminosity, its distance from Earth, the extinction effect of interstellar dust and gas, and the altering of the star's light as it passes through Earth's atmosphere. Intrinsic or absolute magnitude is directly related to a star's luminosity, and is the apparent magnitude a star would be if the distance between the Earth and the star were 10 parsecs (32.6 light-years).[183]
| Apparent magnitude |
Number of stars[184] |
|---|---|
| 0 | 4 |
| 1 | 15 |
| 2 | 48 |
| 3 | 171 |
| 4 | 513 |
| 5 | 1,602 |
| 6 | 4,800 |
| 7 | 14,000 |
Both the apparent and absolute magnitude scales are logarithmic units: one whole number difference in magnitude is equal to a brightness variation of about 2.5 times[185] (the 5th root of 100 or approximately 2.512). This means that a first magnitude star (+1.00) is about 2.5 times brighter than a second magnitude (+2.00) star, and about 100 times brighter than a sixth magnitude star (+6.00). The faintest stars visible to the naked eye under good seeing conditions are about magnitude +6.[186]
On both apparent and absolute magnitude scales, the smaller the magnitude number, the brighter the star; the larger the magnitude number, the fainter the star. The brightest stars, on either scale, have negative magnitude numbers. The variation in brightness (ΔL) between two stars is calculated by subtracting the magnitude number of the brighter star (mb) from the magnitude number of the fainter star (mf), then using the difference as an exponent for the base number 2.512; that is to say:
Relative to both luminosity and distance from Earth, a star's absolute magnitude (M) and apparent magnitude (m) are not equivalent;[185] for example, the bright star Sirius has an apparent magnitude of −1.44, but it has an absolute magnitude of +1.41.
The Sun has an apparent magnitude of −26.7, but its absolute magnitude is only +4.83. Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky as seen from Earth, is approximately 23 times more luminous than the Sun, while Canopus, the second brightest star in the night sky with an absolute magnitude of −5.53, is approximately 14,000 times more luminous than the Sun. Despite Canopus being vastly more luminous than Sirius, the latter star appears the brighter of the two. This is because Sirius is merely 8.6 light-years from the Earth, while Canopus is much farther away at a distance of 310 light-years.[187]
The most luminous known stars have absolute magnitudes of roughly −12, corresponding to 6 million times the luminosity of the Sun.[188] Theoretically, the least luminous stars are at the lower limit of mass at which stars are capable of supporting nuclear fusion of hydrogen in the core; stars just above this limit have been located in the NGC 6397 cluster. The faintest red dwarfs in the cluster are absolute magnitude 15, while a 17th absolute magnitude white dwarf has been discovered.[189][190]
Classification
[edit]| Class | Temperature | Sample star |
|---|---|---|
| O | 33,000 K or more | Zeta Ophiuchi |
| B | 10,500–30,000 K | Rigel |
| A | 7,500–10,000 K | Altair |
| F | 6,000–7,200 K | Procyon A |
| G | 5,500–6,000 K | Sun |
| K | 4,000–5,250 K | Epsilon Indi |
| M | 2,600–3,850 K | Proxima Centauri |
The current stellar classification system originated in the early 20th century, when stars were classified from A to Q based on the strength of the hydrogen line.[192] It was thought that the hydrogen line strength was a simple linear function of temperature. Instead, it was more complicated: it strengthened with increasing temperature, peaked near 9000 K, and then declined at greater temperatures. The classifications were since reordered by temperature, on which the modern scheme is based.[193]
Stars are given a single-letter classification according to their spectra, ranging from type O, which are very hot, to M, which are so cool that molecules may form in their atmospheres. The main classifications in order of decreasing surface temperature are: O, B, A, F, G, K, and M. A variety of rare spectral types are given special classifications. The most common of these are types L and T, which classify the coldest low-mass stars and brown dwarfs. Each letter has 10 sub-divisions, numbered from 0 to 9, in order of decreasing temperature. However, this system breaks down at extreme high temperatures as classes O0 and O1 may not exist.[194]
In addition, stars may be classified by the luminosity effects found in their spectral lines, which correspond to their spatial size and is determined by their surface gravity. These range from 0 (hypergiants) through III (giants) to V (main-sequence dwarfs); some authors add VII (white dwarfs). Main-sequence stars fall along a narrow, diagonal band when graphed according to their absolute magnitude and spectral type.[194] The Sun is a main-sequence G2V yellow dwarf of intermediate temperature and ordinary size.[195]
There is additional nomenclature in the form of lower-case letters added to the end of the spectral type to indicate peculiar features of the spectrum. For example, an "e" can indicate the presence of emission lines; "m" represents unusually strong levels of metals, and "var" can mean variations in the spectral type.[194]
White dwarf stars have their own class that begins with the letter D. This is further sub-divided into the classes DA, DB, DC, DO, DZ, and DQ, depending on the types of prominent lines found in the spectrum. This is followed by a numerical value that indicates the temperature.[196]
Variable stars
[edit]
Variable stars have periodic or random changes in luminosity because of intrinsic or extrinsic properties. Of the intrinsically variable stars, the primary types can be subdivided into three principal groups.
During their stellar evolution, some stars pass through phases where they can become pulsating variables. Pulsating variable stars vary in radius and luminosity over time, expanding and contracting with periods ranging from minutes to years, depending on the size of the star. This category includes Cepheid and Cepheid-like stars, and long-period variables such as Mira.[197]
Eruptive variables are stars that experience sudden increases in luminosity because of flares or mass ejection events.[197] This group includes protostars, Wolf-Rayet stars, and flare stars, as well as giant and supergiant stars.
Cataclysmic or explosive variable stars are those that undergo a dramatic change in their properties. This group includes novae and supernovae. A binary star system that includes a nearby white dwarf can produce certain types of these spectacular stellar explosions, including the nova and a Type Ia supernova.[89] The explosion is created when the white dwarf accretes hydrogen from the companion star, building up mass until the hydrogen undergoes fusion.[198] Some novae are recurrent, having periodic outbursts of moderate amplitude.[197]
Stars can vary in luminosity because of extrinsic factors, such as eclipsing binaries, as well as rotating stars that produce extreme starspots.[197] A notable example of an eclipsing binary is Algol, which regularly varies in magnitude from 2.1 to 3.4 over a period of 2.87 days.[199]
Structure
[edit]
The interior of a stable star is in a state of hydrostatic equilibrium: the forces on any small volume almost exactly counterbalance each other. The balanced forces are inward gravitational force and an outward force due to the pressure gradient within the star. The pressure gradient is established by the temperature gradient of the plasma; the outer part of the star is cooler than the core. The temperature at the core of a main-sequence or giant star is at least on the order of 107 K. The resulting temperature and pressure at the hydrogen-burning core of a main-sequence star are sufficient for nuclear fusion to occur and for sufficient energy to be produced to prevent further collapse of the star.[200][201]
As atomic nuclei are fused in the core, they emit energy in the form of gamma rays. These photons interact with the surrounding plasma, adding to the thermal energy at the core. Stars on the main sequence convert hydrogen into helium, creating a slowly but steadily increasing proportion of helium in the core. Eventually the helium content becomes predominant, and energy production ceases at the core. Instead, for stars of more than 0.4 M☉, fusion occurs in a slowly expanding shell around the degenerate helium core.[202]
In addition to hydrostatic equilibrium, the interior of a stable star will maintain an energy balance of thermal equilibrium. There is a radial temperature gradient throughout the interior that results in a flux of energy flowing toward the exterior. The outgoing flux of energy leaving any layer within the star will exactly match the incoming flux from below.[203]
The radiation zone is the region of the stellar interior where the flux of energy outward is dependent on radiative heat transfer, since convective heat transfer is inefficient in that zone. In this region the plasma will not be perturbed, and any mass motions will die out. Where this is not the case, then the plasma becomes unstable and convection will occur, forming a convection zone. This can occur, for example, in regions where very high energy fluxes occur, such as near the core or in areas with high opacity (making radiatative heat transfer inefficient) as in the outer envelope.[201]
The occurrence of convection in the outer envelope of a main-sequence star depends on the star's mass. Stars with several times the mass of the Sun have a convection zone deep within the interior and a radiative zone in the outer layers. Smaller stars such as the Sun are just the opposite, with the convective zone located in the outer layers.[204] Red dwarf stars with less than 0.4 M☉ are convective throughout, which prevents the accumulation of a helium core.[86] For most stars the convective zones will vary over time as the star ages and the constitution of the interior is modified.[201]

The photosphere is that portion of a star that is visible to an observer. This is the layer at which the plasma of the star becomes transparent to photons of light. From here, the energy generated at the core becomes free to propagate into space. It is within the photosphere that sun spots, regions of lower than average temperature, appear.[205]
Above the level of the photosphere is the stellar atmosphere. In a main-sequence star such as the Sun, the lowest level of the atmosphere, just above the photosphere, is the thin chromosphere region, where spicules appear and stellar flares begin. Above this is the transition region, where the temperature rapidly increases within a distance of only 100 km (62 mi). Beyond this is the corona, a volume of super-heated plasma that can extend outward to several million kilometres.[206] The existence of a corona appears to be dependent on a convective zone in the outer layers of the star.[204] Despite its high temperature, the corona emits very little light, due to its low gas density.[207] The corona region of the Sun is normally only visible during a solar eclipse.
From the corona, a stellar wind of plasma particles expands outward from the star, until it interacts with the interstellar medium. For the Sun, the influence of its solar wind extends throughout a bubble-shaped region called the heliosphere.[208]
Nuclear fusion reaction pathways
[edit]When nuclei fuse, the mass of the fused product is less than the mass of the original parts. This lost mass is converted to electromagnetic energy, according to the mass–energy equivalence relationship .[209] A variety of nuclear fusion reactions take place in the cores of stars, that depend upon their mass and composition.
The hydrogen fusion process is temperature-sensitive, so a moderate increase in the core temperature will result in a significant increase in the fusion rate. As a result, the core temperature of main-sequence stars only varies from 4 million kelvin for a small M-class star to 40 million kelvin for a massive O-class star.[172]
In the Sun, with a 16-million-kelvin core, hydrogen fuses to form helium in the proton–proton chain reaction:[210]
- 41H → 22H + 2e+ + 2νe(2 x 0.4 MeV)
- 2e+ + 2e− → 2γ (2 x 1.0 MeV)
- 21H + 22H → 23He + 2γ (2 x 5.5 MeV)
- 23He → 4He + 21H (12.9 MeV)
There are a couple other paths, in which 3He and 4He combine to form 7Be, which eventually (with the addition of another proton) yields two 4He, a gain of one.
All these reactions result in the overall reaction:
- 41H → 4He + 2γ + 2νe (26.7 MeV)
where γ is a gamma ray photon, νe is a neutrino, and H and He are isotopes of hydrogen and helium, respectively. The energy released by this reaction is in millions of electron volts. Each individual reaction produces only a tiny amount of energy, but because enormous numbers of these reactions occur constantly, they produce all the energy necessary to sustain the star's radiation output. In comparison, the combustion of two hydrogen gas molecules with one oxygen gas molecule releases only 5.7 eV.
In more massive stars, helium is produced in a cycle of reactions catalyzed by carbon called the carbon-nitrogen-oxygen cycle.[210]
In evolved stars with cores at 100 million kelvin and masses between 0.5 and 10 M☉, helium can be transformed into carbon in the triple-alpha process that uses the intermediate element beryllium:[210]
For an overall reaction of:

- 34He → 12C + γ + 7.2 MeV
In massive stars, heavier elements can be burned in a contracting core through the neon-burning process and oxygen-burning process. The final stage in the stellar nucleosynthesis process is the silicon-burning process that results in the production of the stable isotope iron-56.[210] Any further fusion would be an endothermic process that consumes energy, and so further energy can only be produced through gravitational collapse.
| Fuel material |
Temperature (million kelvins) |
Density (kg/cm3) |
Burn duration (τ in years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| H | 37 | 0.0045 | 8.1 million |
| He | 188 | 0.97 | 1.2 million |
| C | 870 | 170 | 976 |
| Ne | 1,570 | 3,100 | 0.6 |
| O | 1,980 | 5,550 | 1.25 |
| S/Si | 3,340 | 33,400 | 0.0315 (~11.5 days) |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Temming, Maria (15 July 2014). "What is a star?". AAS Sky Publishing, LLC. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
- ^ Grego, Peter; Mannion, David (2010). Galileo and 400 Years of Telescopic Astronomy. Springer New York. ISBN 978-1441955920.
- ^
- Kunth, Daniel; Terlevich, Elena (2024). "Stars". StarWords. Popular Astronomy. Springer. p. 19. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49024-8_3. ISBN 978-3-031-49023-1.
- Mallory, J. P.; Adams, Douglas Q. (1997). "Star". Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. Taylor & Francis. p. 543. ISBN 978-1-884964-98-5. OL 402075M.
- ^ Harper, Douglas (2001–2022). "*ster- (2)". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ Hevelius, Johannis (1690). Firmamentum Sobiescianum, sive Uranographia. Gdansk.
- ^ "Ancient Greek Astronomy and Cosmology". Digital Collections. The Library of Congress. n.d. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ Forbes, George (1909). History of Astronomy. London: Watts & Co. ISBN 978-1-153-62774-0.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: ignored ISBN errors (link) - ^ Tøndering, Claus (2008). "Other Ancient Calendars". Calendars Through The Ages. Webexhibits. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ von Spaeth, Ove (2000). "Dating the Oldest Egyptian Star Map". Centaurus. 42 (3): 159–179. Bibcode:2000Cent...42..159V. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0498.2000.420301.x. Retrieved 21 October 2007.
- ^ North, John (1995). The Norton History of Astronomy and Cosmology. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company. pp. 30–31. ISBN 978-0-393-03656-5.
- ^ Murdin, P. (2000). "Aristillus (c. 200 BC)". Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Bibcode:2000eaa..bookE3440.. doi:10.1888/0333750888/3440. ISBN 978-0-333-75088-9.
- ^ Grasshoff, Gerd (1990). The history of Ptolemy's star catalogue. Springer. pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-0-387-97181-0.
- ^ Pinotsis, Antonios D. (2008). "Astronomy in Ancient Rhodes". Protostellar Jets In Context. University of Athens, Greece. Archived from the original on 7 September 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ Clark, D. H.; Stephenson, F. R. (29 June 1981). "The Historical Supernovae". Supernovae: A survey of current research; Proceedings of the Advanced Study Institute. Advanced Study Institute. Cambridge, UK: Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company. pp. 355–370. Bibcode:1982ASIC...90..355C.
- ^ Zhao, Fu-Yuan; Strom, R. G.; Jiang, Shi-Yang (2006). "The Guest Star of AD185 must have been a Supernova". Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 6 (5): 635. Bibcode:2006ChJAA...6..635Z. doi:10.1088/1009-9271/6/5/17.
- ^ Isbell, Douglas; Benoit, Phil (5 March 2003). "Astronomers Peg Brightness of History's Brightest Star". NOIRLab. National Optical Astronomy Observatory. Archived from the original on 2 April 2003. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- ^ Frommert, Hartmut; Kronberg, Christine (30 August 2006). "Supernova 1054 – Creation of the Crab Nebula". SEDS. University of Arizona.
- ^ Duyvendak, J. J. L. (April 1942). "Further Data Bearing on the Identification of the Crab Nebula with the Supernova of 1054 A.D. Part I. The Ancient Oriental Chronicles". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 54 (318): 91–94. Bibcode:1942PASP...54...91D. doi:10.1086/125409.
Mayall, N. U.; Oort, Jan Hendrik (April 1942). "Further Data Bearing on the Identification of the Crab Nebula with the Supernova of 1054 A.D. Part II. The Astronomical Aspects". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 54 (318): 95–104. Bibcode:1942PASP...54...95M. doi:10.1086/125410. - ^ Brecher, K.; et al. (1983). "Ancient records and the Crab Nebula supernova". The Observatory. 103: 106–113. Bibcode:1983Obs...103..106B.
- ^ Kennedy, Edward S. (1962). "Review: The Observatory in Islam and Its Place in the General History of the Observatory by Aydin Sayili". Isis. 53 (2): 237–239. doi:10.1086/349558.
- ^ Jones, Kenneth Glyn (1991). Messier's nebulae and star clusters. Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-521-37079-0.
- ^ Zahoor, A. (1997). "Al-Biruni". Hasanuddin University. Archived from the original on 26 June 2008. Retrieved 21 October 2007.
- ^ Montada, Josep Puig (28 September 2007). "Ibn Bajja". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 11 July 2008.
- ^ a b c Drake, Stephen A. (17 August 2006). "A Brief History of High-Energy (X-ray & Gamma-Ray) Astronomy". NASA HEASARC. Retrieved 24 August 2006.
- ^ Greskovic, Peter; Rudy, Peter (24 July 2006). "Exoplanets". ESO. Archived from the original on 10 October 2008. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
- ^ Ahmad, I. A. (1995). "The impact of the Qur'anic conception of astronomical phenomena on Islamic civilization". Vistas in Astronomy. 39 (4): 395–403 [402]. Bibcode:1995VA.....39..395A. doi:10.1016/0083-6656(95)00033-X.
- ^ Setia, Adi (2004). "Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi on Physics and the Nature of the Physical World: A Preliminary Survey" (PDF). Islam & Science. 2 (2). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 January 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2018.
- ^ Hoskin, Michael (1998). "The Value of Archives in Writing the History of Astronomy". Library and Information Services in Astronomy III. 153: 207. Bibcode:1998ASPC..153..207H. Retrieved 24 August 2006.
- ^ Proctor, Richard A. (1870). "Are any of the nebulæ star-systems?". Nature. 1 (13): 331–333. Bibcode:1870Natur...1..331P. doi:10.1038/001331a0.
- ^ Magill, Frank Northen (1992). Magill's Survey of Science: A-Cherenkov detectors. Salem Press. p. 219. ISBN 978-0-89356-619-7.
- ^ MacDonnell, Joseph. "Angelo Secchi, S.J. (1818–1878) the Father of Astrophysics". Fairfield University. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 2 October 2006.
- ^ Hubeny, Ivan; Mihalas, Dimitri (2014). Theory of Stellar Atmospheres: An Introduction to Astrophysical Non-equilibrium Quantitative Spectroscopic Analysis. Princeton University Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-691-16329-1.
- ^ Aitken, Robert G. (1964). The Binary Stars. New York: Dover Publications Inc. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-486-61102-0.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: ignored ISBN errors (link) - ^ Michelson, A. A.; Pease, F. G. (1921). "Measurement of the diameter of Alpha Orionis with the interferometer". Astrophysical Journal. 53 (5): 249–259. Bibcode:1921ApJ....53..249M. doi:10.1086/142603. PMC 1084808. PMID 16586823. S2CID 21969744.
- ^ "" Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia Helena." CWP". University of California. Archived from the original on 18 March 2005. Retrieved 21 February 2013.
- ^ a b c Unsöld, Albrecht (2001). The New Cosmos (5th ed.). New York: Springer. pp. 180–185, 215–216. ISBN 978-3-540-67877-9.
- ^ Gordon, Michael S.; Humphreys, Roberta M.; Jones, Terry J. (July 2016). "Luminous and Variable Stars in M31 and M33. III. The Yellow and Red Supergiants and Post-red Supergiant Evolution". The Astrophysical Journal. 825 (1): 50. arXiv:1603.08003. Bibcode:2016ApJ...825...50G. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/50. ISSN 0004-637X. S2CID 119281102.
- ^ Brown, A. G. A.; et al. (Gaia collaboration) (2021). "Gaia Early Data Release 3: Summary of the contents and survey properties". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 649: A1. arXiv:2012.01533. Bibcode:2021A&A...649A...1G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657. S2CID 227254300. (Erratum: doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657e).
- ^ De Grijs, Richard; Bono, Giuseppe (2020). "Clustering of Local Group Distances: Publication Bias or Correlated Measurements? VI. Extending to Virgo Cluster Distances". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 246 (1): 3. arXiv:1911.04312. Bibcode:2020ApJS..246....3D. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab5711. S2CID 207852888.
- ^ Villard, Ray; Freedman, Wendy L. (26 October 1994). "Hubble Space Telescope Measures Precise Distance to the Most Remote Galaxy Yet". Hubble Site. Retrieved 5 August 2007.
- ^ Solovyeva, Y.; Vinokurov, A.; Sarkisyan, A.; Atapin, K.; Fabrika, S.; Valeev, A. F.; Kniazev, A.; Sholukhova, O.; Maslennikova, O. (2020). "New luminous blue variable candidates in the NGC 247 galaxy". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 497 (4): 4834. arXiv:2008.06215. Bibcode:2020MNRAS.497.4834S. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2117. S2CID 221451751.
- ^ Kelly, Patrick L.; et al. (2 April 2018). "Extreme magnification of an individual star at redshift 1.5 by a galaxy-cluster lens". Nature. 2 (4): 334–342. arXiv:1706.10279. Bibcode:2018NatAs...2..334K. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0430-3. S2CID 125826925.
- ^ Howell, Elizabeth (2 April 2018). "Rare Cosmic Alignment Reveals Most Distant Star Ever Seen". Space.com. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
- ^ Koch-Westenholz, Ulla; Koch, Ulla Susanne (1995). Mesopotamian astrology: an introduction to Babylonian and Assyrian celestial divination. Carsten Niebuhr Institute Publications. Vol. 19. Museum Tusculanum Press. p. 163. ISBN 978-87-7289-287-0.
- ^ a b Coleman, Leslie S. "Myths, Legends and Lore". Frosty Drew Observatory. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
- ^ "Naming Astronomical Objects". International Astronomical Union (IAU). Retrieved 30 January 2009.
- ^ "Naming Stars". Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS). Retrieved 30 January 2009.
- ^ Lyall, Francis; Larsen, Paul B. (2009). "Chapter 7: The Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". Space Law: A Treatise. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 176. ISBN 978-0-7546-4390-6.
- ^ "IAU Working Group on Star Names (WGSN)". Retrieved 22 May 2016.
- ^ "Naming Stars". Retrieved 5 February 2021.
- ^ Andersen, Johannes. "Buying Stars and Star Names". International Astronomical Union. Retrieved 24 June 2010.
- ^ "Star naming". Scientia Astrophysical Organization. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 June 2010. Retrieved 29 June 2010.
- ^ "Disclaimer: Name a star, name a rose and other, similar enterprises". British Library. The British Library Board. Archived from the original on 19 January 2010. Retrieved 29 June 2010.
- ^ Plait, Philip C. (2002). Bad astronomy: misconceptions and misuses revealed, from astrology to the moon landing "hoax". John Wiley and Sons. pp. 237–240. ISBN 978-0-471-40976-2.
- ^ Sclafani, Tom (8 May 1998). "Consumer Affairs Commissioner Polonetsky Warns Consumers: "Buying A Star Won't Make You One"". National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, Aricebo Observatory. Archived from the original on 11 January 2006. Retrieved 24 June 2010.
- ^ a b c d Prsa, A.; Harmanec, P.; Torres, G.; Mamajek, E.; et al. (2016). "Nominal values for selected solar and planetary quantities: IAU 2015 Resolution B3". Astronomical Journal. 152 (2): 41. arXiv:1605.09788. Bibcode:2016AJ....152...41P. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41. S2CID 55319250.
- ^ Woodward, P. R. (1978). "Theoretical models of star formation". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 16 (1): 555–584. Bibcode:1978ARA&A..16..555W. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.16.090178.003011.
- ^ Lada, C. J.; Lada, E. A. (2003). "Embedded Clusters in Molecular Clouds". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 41 (1): 57–115. arXiv:astro-ph/0301540. Bibcode:2003ARA&A..41...57L. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844. S2CID 16752089.
- ^ Murray, Norman (2011). "Star Formation Efficiencies and Lifetimes of Giant Molecular Clouds in the Milky Way". The Astrophysical Journal. 729 (2): 133. arXiv:1007.3270. Bibcode:2011ApJ...729..133M. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/133. S2CID 118627665.
- ^ Kwok, Sun (2000). The origin and evolution of planetary nebulae. Cambridge astrophysics series. Vol. 33. Cambridge University Press. pp. 103–104. ISBN 978-0-521-62313-1.
- ^ a b Adams, Fred C.; Laughlin, Gregory; Graves, Genevieve J. M. "Red Dwarfs and the End of the Main Sequence" (PDF). Gravitational Collapse: From Massive Stars to Planets. Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica. pp. 46–49. Bibcode:2004RMxAC..22...46A. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2008.
- ^ a b c Kolb, Vera M., ed. (2014). Astrobiology, An Evolutionary Approach. Taylor & Francis. pp. 21–25. ISBN 978-1466584617.
- ^ a b Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G. S. (2013). Stellar Physics: Stellar Evolution and Stability. Translated by Blinov, A. Y.; Romanova, M. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 108–125. ISBN 978-3662226391.
- ^ Ibeling, Duligur; Heger, Alexander (March 2013). "The Metallicity Dependence of the Minimum Mass for Core-collapse Supernovae". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 765 (2): 4. arXiv:1301.5783. Bibcode:2013ApJ...765L..43I. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L43. S2CID 118474569. L43.
- ^ Thielemann, F. -K.; et al. (2011). "Massive Stars and their Supernovae". In Diehl, Roland; et al. (eds.). Astronomy with Radioactivities. Lecture Notes in Physics. Vol. 812. Berlin: Springer. pp. 153–232. arXiv:1008.2144. Bibcode:2011LNP...812..153T. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12698-7_4. ISBN 978-3-642-12697-0. S2CID 119254840.
- ^ Elmegreen, B. G.; Lada, C. J. (1977). "Sequential formation of subgroups in OB associations". Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. 214: 725–741. Bibcode:1977ApJ...214..725E. doi:10.1086/155302.
- ^ Getman, K. V.; et al. (2012). "The Elephant Trunk Nebula and the Trumpler 37 cluster: contribution of triggered star formation to the total population of an H II region". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 426 (4): 2917–2943. arXiv:1208.1471. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.426.2917G. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21879.x. S2CID 49528100.
- ^ Smith, Michael David (2004). The Origin of Stars. Imperial College Press. pp. 57–68. ISBN 978-1-86094-501-4.
- ^ Seligman, Courtney. "Slow Contraction of Protostellar Cloud". Self-published. Archived from the original on 23 June 2008. Retrieved 5 September 2006.
- ^ Hanslmeier, Arnold (2010). Water in the Universe. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 163. ISBN 978-90-481-9984-6.
- ^ Bally, J.; Morse, J.; Reipurth, B. (1996). "The Birth of Stars: Herbig-Haro Jets, Accretion and Proto-Planetary Disks". In Benvenuti, Piero; Macchetto, F. D.; Schreier, Ethan J. (eds.). Science with the Hubble Space Telescope – II. Proceedings of a workshop held in Paris, France, December 4–8, 1995. Space Science Institute Workshop, Paris, France, December 4–8, 1995. Space Telescope Science Institute. p. 491. Bibcode:1996swhs.conf..491B.
- ^ Smith, Michael David (2004). The origin of stars. Imperial College Press. p. 176. ISBN 978-1-86094-501-4.
- ^ Megeath, Tom (11 May 2010). "Herschel finds a hole in space". ESA. Retrieved 17 May 2010.
- ^ Darling, David (2004). The Universal Book of Astronomy: From the Andromeda Galaxy to the Zone of Avoidance. Wiley. p. 229. ISBN 978-0-471-26569-6.
- ^ Duquennoy, A.; Mayor, M. (1991). "Multiplicity among solar-type stars in the solar neighbourhood. II – Distribution of the orbital elements in an unbiased sample". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 248 (2): 485–524. Bibcode:1991A&A...248..485D.
- ^ Padmanabhan, T. (2000). Theoretical Astrophysics: Volume 2, Stars and Stellar Systems. Cambridge University Press. p. 557. ISBN 978-0-521-56631-5.
- ^ Mengel, J. G.; et al. (1979). "Stellar evolution from the zero-age main sequence". Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 40: 733–791. Bibcode:1979ApJS...40..733M. doi:10.1086/190603.
- ^ a b Sackmann, I. J.; Boothroyd, A. I.; Kraemer, K. E. (1993). "Our Sun. III. Present and Future". Astrophysical Journal. 418: 457. Bibcode:1993ApJ...418..457S. doi:10.1086/173407.
- ^ Wood, B. E.; et al. (2002). "Measured Mass-Loss Rates of Solar-like Stars as a Function of Age and Activity". The Astrophysical Journal. 574 (1): 412–425. arXiv:astro-ph/0203437. Bibcode:2002ApJ...574..412W. doi:10.1086/340797. S2CID 1500425.
- ^ de Loore, C.; de Greve, J. P.; Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. (1977). "Evolution of massive stars with mass loss by stellar wind". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 61 (2): 251–259. Bibcode:1977A&A....61..251D.
- ^ "The evolution of stars between 50 and 100 times the mass of the Sun". England: Royal Greenwich Observatory. Archived from the original on 18 November 2015. Retrieved 17 November 2015.
- ^ "Main Sequence Lifetime". Swinburne Astronomy Online Encyclopedia of Astronomy. Swinburne University of Technology.
- ^ Pizzolato, N.; et al. (2001). "Subphotospheric convection and magnetic activity dependence on metallicity and age: Models and tests". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 373 (2): 597–607. Bibcode:2001A&A...373..597P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010626.
- ^ "Mass loss and Evolution". UCL Astrophysics Group. 18 June 2004. Archived from the original on 22 November 2004. Retrieved 26 August 2006.
- ^ Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Workshop on Astronomy and Astrophysics (1984). Gas in the Interstellar Medium: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Workshop on Astronomy and Astrophysics : 21–23 May, 1983, The Cosener's House, Abingdon. Science and Engineering Research Council, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
- ^ a b Richmond, Michael. "Late stages of evolution for low-mass stars". Rochester Institute of Technology. Retrieved 4 August 2006.
- ^ "Stellar Evolution & Death". NASA Observatorium. Archived from the original on 10 February 2008. Retrieved 8 June 2006.
- ^ Schröder, K.-P.; Smith, Robert Connon (2008). "Distant future of the Sun and Earth revisited". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386 (1): 155–163. arXiv:0801.4031. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.386..155S. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13022.x. S2CID 10073988. See also Palmer, Jason (22 February 2008). "Hope dims that Earth will survive Sun's death". NewScientist.com news service. Retrieved 24 March 2008.
- ^ a b Iben, Icko Jr. (1991). "Single and binary star evolution". Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 76: 55–114. Bibcode:1991ApJS...76...55I. doi:10.1086/191565.
- ^ a b Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (7 September 2017). "Chapter 13". An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108422161.
- ^ Sagan, Carl (1980). "The Lives of the Stars". Cosmos: A Personal Voyage.
- ^ Puebla, Raul E.; Hillier, D. John; Zsargó, Janos; Cohen, David H.; Leutenegger, Maurice A. (1 March 2016). "X-ray, UV and optical analysis of supergiants: ε Ori". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 456 (3): 2907–2936. arXiv:1511.09365. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2783. ISSN 0035-8711.
- ^ Vanbeveren, D.; De Loore, C.; Van Rensbergen, W. (1 December 1998). "Massive stars". The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review. 9 (1): 63–152. Bibcode:1998A&ARv...9...63V. doi:10.1007/s001590050015. ISSN 1432-0754.
- ^ Conti, P. S.; de Loore, C. (2012). Mass Loss and Evolution of O-Type Stars. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-94-009-9452-2.
- ^ "The Evolution of Massive Stars and Type II Supernovae". Penn Stats College of Science. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
- ^ Sneden, Christopher (8 February 2001). "Astronomy: The age of the Universe". Nature. 409 (6821): 673–675. doi:10.1038/35055646. PMID 11217843. S2CID 4316598.
- ^ Liebert, James (1980). "White dwarf stars". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 18 (2): 363–398. Bibcode:1980ARA&A..18..363L. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.002051.
- ^ Mann, Adam (11 August 2020). "This is the way the universe ends: not with a whimper, but a bang". Science | AAAS.
- ^ a b c "Introduction to Supernova Remnants". Goddard Space Flight Center. 6 April 2006. Retrieved 16 July 2006.
- ^ Fryer, C. L. (2003). "Black-hole formation from stellar collapse". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 20 (10): S73 – S80. Bibcode:2003CQGra..20S..73F. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/309. S2CID 122297043.
- ^ Vuorinen, Aleksi (2019). "Neutron stars and stellar mergers as a laboratory for dense QCD matter". Nuclear Physics A. 982: 36. arXiv:1807.04480. Bibcode:2019NuPhA.982...36V. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.10.011. S2CID 56422826.
- ^ Leiner, Emily M.; Geller, Aaron (1 January 2021). "A Census of Blue Stragglers in Gaia DR2 Open Clusters as a Test of Population Synthesis and Mass Transfer Physics". The Astrophysical Journal. 908 (2): 229. arXiv:2101.11047. Bibcode:2021ApJ...908..229L. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd7e9. S2CID 231718656.
- ^ Brogaard, K.; Christiansen, S. M.; Grundahl, F.; Miglio, A.; Izzard, R. G.; Tauris, T. M.; Sandquist, E. L.; VandenBerg, D. A.; Jessen-Hansen, J.; Arentoft, T.; Bruntt, H.; Frandsen, S.; Orosz, J. A.; Feiden, G. A.; Mathieu, R.; Geller, A.; Shetrone, M.; Ryde, N.; Stello, D.; Platais, I.; Meibom, S. (21 December 2018). "The blue straggler V106 in NGC 6791: a prototype progenitor of old single giants masquerading as young". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 481 (4): 5062–5072. arXiv:1809.00705. Bibcode:2018MNRAS.481.5062B. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2504.
- ^ Beccari, Giacomo; Boffin, Henri M. J. (2019). The Impact of Binary Stars on Stellar Evolution. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-42858-3.
- ^ Yoon, Sung-Chul; Dessart, Luc; Clocchiatti, Alejandro (2017). "Type Ib and IIb Supernova Progenitors in Interacting Binary Systems". The Astrophysical Journal. 840 (1): 10. arXiv:1701.02089. Bibcode:2017ApJ...840...10Y. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6afe. S2CID 119058919.
- ^ McClelland, L. A. S.; Eldridge, J. J. (2016). "Helium stars: Towards an understanding of Wolf-Rayet evolution". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 459 (2): 1505. arXiv:1602.06358. Bibcode:2016MNRAS.459.1505M. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw618. S2CID 119105982.
- ^ Shenar, T.; Gilkis, A.; Vink, J. S.; Sana, H.; Sander, A. A. C. (2020). "Why binary interaction does not necessarily dominate the formation of Wolf-Rayet stars at low metallicity". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 634: A79. arXiv:2001.04476. Bibcode:2020A&A...634A..79S. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936948. S2CID 210472736.
- ^ Fountain, Henry (17 October 2016). "Two Trillion Galaxies, at the Very Least". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 October 2016.
- ^ Staff (2019). "How Many Stars Are There In The Universe?". European Space Agency. Retrieved 21 September 2019.
- ^ Marov, Mikhail Ya. (2015). "The Structure of the Universe". The Fundamentals of Modern Astrophysics. pp. 279–294. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8730-2_10. ISBN 978-1-4614-8729-6.
- ^ Mackie, Glen (1 February 2002). "To see the Universe in a Grain of Taranaki Sand". Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing. Retrieved 28 January 2017.
- ^ Borenstein, Seth (1 December 2010). "Universe's Star Count Could Triple". Associated Press. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
- ^ Van Dokkum, Pieter G.; Conroy, Charlie (2010). "A substantial population of low-mass stars in luminous elliptical galaxies". Nature. 468 (7326): 940–942. arXiv:1009.5992. Bibcode:2010Natur.468..940V. doi:10.1038/nature09578. PMID 21124316. S2CID 205222998.
- ^ "Hubble Finds Intergalactic Stars". Hubble News Desk. 14 January 1997. Retrieved 6 November 2006.
- ^ Puchwein, Ewald; Springel, Volker; Sijacki, Debora; Dolag, Klaus (1 August 2010). "Intracluster stars in simulations with active galactic nucleus feedback". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 406 (2): 936–951. arXiv:1001.3018. Bibcode:2010MNRAS.406..936P. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16786.x.
- ^ Lin, Yen-Ting; Mohr, Joseph J. (20 December 2004). "K-band Properties of Galaxy Clusters and Groups: Brightest Cluster Galaxies and Intracluster Light". The Astrophysical Journal. 617 (2): 879–895. arXiv:astro-ph/0408557. Bibcode:2004ApJ...617..879L. doi:10.1086/425412. S2CID 119347770.
- ^ Szebehely, Victor G.; Curran, Richard B. (1985). Stability of the Solar System and Its Minor Natural and Artificial Bodies. Springer. ISBN 978-90-277-2046-7.
- ^ "Most Milky Way Stars Are Single" (Press release). Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. 30 January 2006. Retrieved 16 July 2006.
- ^ Sanders, Robert (13 June 2017). "New evidence that all stars are born in pairs". Berkeley News.
- ^ Sadavoy, Sarah I.; Stahler, Steven W. (August 2017). "Embedded binaries and their dense cores". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 469 (4): 3881–3900. arXiv:1705.00049. Bibcode:2017MNRAS.469.3881S. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1061.
- ^ 3.99×1013 km / (3×104 km/h × 24 × 365.25) = 1.5×105 years.
- ^ Holmberg, J.; Flynn, C. (2000). "The local density of matter mapped by Hipparcos". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 313 (2): 209–216. arXiv:astro-ph/9812404. Bibcode:2000MNRAS.313..209H. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.02905.x. S2CID 16868380.
- ^ Norby, David (1 January 2006). "How close can stars get to each other in galaxy cores?". Astronomy.com. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
- ^ Gratton, Raffaele; Bragaglia, Angela; Carretta, Eugenio; D'Orazi, Valentina; Lucatello, Sara; Sollima, Antonio (15 May 2019). "What is a globular cluster? An observational perspective". The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review. 27 (1): 8. arXiv:1911.02835. Bibcode:2019A&ARv..27....8G. doi:10.1007/s00159-019-0119-3. ISSN 1432-0754. S2CID 207847491. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
- ^ "Imagine the Universe!". imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
- ^ "Astronomers: Star collisions are rampant, catastrophic". CNN News. 2 June 2000. Archived from the original on 7 January 2007. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
- ^ Lombardi, J. C. Jr.; et al. (2002). "Stellar Collisions and the Interior Structure of Blue Stragglers". The Astrophysical Journal. 568 (2): 939–953. arXiv:astro-ph/0107388. Bibcode:2002ApJ...568..939L. doi:10.1086/339060. S2CID 13878176.
- ^ a b H. E. Bond; E. P. Nelan; D. A. VandenBerg; G. H. Schaefer; D. Harmer (2013). "HD 140283: A Star in the Solar Neighborhood that Formed Shortly After the Big Bang". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 765 (1): L12. arXiv:1302.3180. Bibcode:2013ApJ...765L..12B. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L12. S2CID 119247629.
- ^ Planck Collaboration (2016). "Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters (See Table 4 on page 31 of pfd)". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 594: A13. arXiv:1502.01589. Bibcode:2016A&A...594A..13P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830. S2CID 119262962.
- ^ Naftilan, S. A.; Stetson, P. B. (13 July 2006). "How do scientists determine the ages of stars? Is the technique really accurate enough to use it to verify the age of the universe?". Scientific American. Retrieved 11 May 2007.
- ^ Laughlin, G.; Bodenheimer, P.; Adams, F. C. (1997). "The End of the Main Sequence". The Astrophysical Journal. 482 (1): 420–432. Bibcode:1997ApJ...482..420L. doi:10.1086/304125.
- ^ Pols, Onno R.; Schröder, Klaus-Peter; Hurley, Jarrod R.; Tout, Christopher A.; Eggleton, Peter P. (1998). "Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 298 (2): 525. Bibcode:1998MNRAS.298..525P. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01658.x.
- ^ Irwin, Judith A. (2007). Astrophysics: Decoding the Cosmos. John Wiley and Sons. p. 78. Bibcode:2007adc..book.....I. ISBN 978-0-470-01306-9.
- ^ Fischer, D. A.; Valenti, J. (2005). "The Planet-Metallicity Correlation". The Astrophysical Journal. 622 (2): 1102–1117. Bibcode:2005ApJ...622.1102F. doi:10.1086/428383.
- ^ "Signatures Of The First Stars". ScienceDaily. 17 April 2005. Retrieved 10 October 2006.
- ^ Feltzing, S.; Gonzalez, G. (2000). "The nature of super-metal-rich stars: Detailed abundance analysis of 8 super-metal-rich star candidates" (PDF). Astronomy & Astrophysics. 367 (1): 253–265. Bibcode:2001A&A...367..253F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000477. S2CID 16502974.
- ^ Gray, David F. (1992). The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres. Cambridge University Press. pp. 413–414. ISBN 978-0-521-40868-4.
- ^ Jørgensen, Uffe G. (1997). "Cool Star Models". In van Dishoeck, Ewine F. (ed.). Molecules in Astrophysics: Probes and Processes. International Astronomical Union Symposia. Molecules in Astrophysics: Probes and Processes. Vol. 178. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 446. ISBN 978-0792345381.
- ^ "The Biggest Star in the Sky". ESO. 11 March 1997. Retrieved 10 July 2006.
- ^ Ragland, S.; Chandrasekhar, T.; Ashok, N. M. (1995). "Angular Diameter of Carbon Star Tx-Piscium from Lunar Occultation Observations in the Near Infrared". Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy. 16: 332. Bibcode:1995JApAS..16..332R.
- ^ Mittag, M.; Schröder, K.-P.; Perdelwitz, V.; Jack, D.; Schmitt, J. H. M. M. (January 2023). "Chromospheric activity and photospheric variation of α Ori during the great dimming event in 2020". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 669: A9. arXiv:2211.04967. Bibcode:2023A&A...669A...9M. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244924. ISSN 0004-6361.
- ^ Davis, Kate (1 December 2000). "Variable Star of the Month – December, 2000: Alpha Orionis". AAVSO. Archived from the original on 12 July 2006. Retrieved 13 August 2006.
- ^ Loktin, A. V. (September 2006). "Kinematics of stars in the Pleiades open cluster". Astronomy Reports. 50 (9): 714–721. Bibcode:2006ARep...50..714L. doi:10.1134/S1063772906090058. S2CID 121701212.
- ^ Bland-Hawthorn, Joss; Freeman, Kenneth; Matteucci, Francesca (2014). "Appendix B: Stellar Data: Sources and Techniques". In Moore, Ben (ed.). The Origin of the Galaxy and Local Group. Saas-Fee Advanced Course 37 Swiss Society for Astrophysics and Astronomy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 114. ISBN 978-3642417207.
- ^ Birney, D. Scott; Gonzalez, Guillermo; Oesper, David (2006). Observational Astronomy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 72–79. ISBN 978-1316139400.
- ^ "Hipparcos: High Proper Motion Stars". ESA. 10 September 1999. Retrieved 10 October 2006.
- ^ Johnson, Hugh M. (1957). "The Kinematics and Evolution of Population I Stars". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 69 (406): 54. Bibcode:1957PASP...69...54J. doi:10.1086/127012.
- ^ Elmegreen, B.; Efremov, Y. N. (1999). "The Formation of Star Clusters". American Scientist. 86 (3): 264. Bibcode:1998AmSci..86..264E. doi:10.1511/1998.3.264. S2CID 209833510. Archived from the original on 23 March 2005. Retrieved 23 August 2006.
- ^ Brainerd, Jerome James (6 July 2005). "X-rays from Stellar Coronas". The Astrophysics Spectator. Retrieved 21 June 2007.
- ^ a b Michelson, A. A.; Pease, F. G. (2005). "Starspots: A Key to the Stellar Dynamo". Living Reviews in Solar Physics. 2 (1): 8. Bibcode:2005LRSP....2....8B. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2005-8.
- ^ Carrasco, V. M. S.; Vaquero, J. M.; Gallego, M. C.; Muñoz-Jaramillo, A.; de Toma, G.; Galaviz, P.; Arlt, R.; Senthamizh Pavai, V.; Sánchez-Bajo, F.; Villalba Álvarez, J.; Gómez, J. M. (2019). "Sunspot Characteristics at the Onset of the Maunder Minimum Based on the Observations of Hevelius". The Astrophysical Journal. 886 (1): 18. arXiv:2103.09495. Bibcode:2019ApJ...886...18C. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4ade. ISSN 1538-4357.
- ^ Smith, Nathan (1998). "The Behemoth Eta Carinae: A Repeat Offender". Mercury Magazine. 27 (4): 20. Bibcode:1998Mercu..27d..20S. Archived from the original on 27 September 2006. Retrieved 13 August 2006.
- ^ Weidner, C.; Kroupa, P. (11 February 2004). "Evidence for a fundamental stellar upper mass limit from clustered star formation". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 348 (1): 187–191. arXiv:astro-ph/0310860. Bibcode:2004MNRAS.348..187W. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07340.x. S2CID 119338524.
- ^ Hainich, R.; Rühling, U.; Todt, H.; Oskinova, L. M.; Liermann, A.; Gräfener, G.; Foellmi, C.; Schnurr, O.; Hamann, W.-R. (2014). "The Wolf-Rayet stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 565: A27. arXiv:1401.5474. Bibcode:2014A&A...565A..27H. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322696. S2CID 55123954.
- ^ Banerjee, Sambaran; Kroupa, Pavel; Oh, Seungkyung (21 October 2012). "The emergence of super-canonical stars in R136-type starburst clusters". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 426 (2): 1416–1426. arXiv:1208.0826. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.426.1416B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21672.x. S2CID 119202197.
- ^ "Ferreting Out The First Stars". Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. 22 September 2005. Retrieved 5 September 2006.
- ^ Sobral, David; Matthee, Jorryt; Darvish, Behnam; Schaerer, Daniel; Mobasher, Bahram; Röttgering, Huub J. A.; Santos, Sérgio; Hemmati, Shoubaneh (4 June 2015). "Evidence For POPIII-Like Stellar Populations In The Most Luminous LYMAN-α Emitters At The Epoch Of Re-Ionisation: Spectroscopic Confirmation". The Astrophysical Journal. 808 (2): 139. arXiv:1504.01734. Bibcode:2015ApJ...808..139S. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/139. S2CID 18471887.
- ^ Overbye, Dennis (17 June 2015). "Astronomers Report Finding Earliest Stars That Enriched Cosmos". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
- ^ "2MASS J05233822-1403022". SIMBAD – Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
- ^ a b Boss, Alan (3 April 2001). "Are They Planets or What?". Carnegie Institution of Washington. Archived from the original on 28 September 2006. Retrieved 8 June 2006.
- ^ a b c Shiga, David (17 August 2006). "Mass cut-off between stars and brown dwarfs revealed". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 14 November 2006. Retrieved 23 August 2006.
- ^ Leadbeater, Elli (18 August 2006). "Hubble glimpses faintest stars". BBC. Retrieved 22 August 2006.
- ^ "Flattest Star Ever Seen". ESO. 11 June 2003. Retrieved 3 October 2006.
- ^ "Solar Rotation Varies by Latitude". NASA. 23 January 2013.
- ^ Howard, R.; Harvey, J. (1970). "Spectroscopic Determinations of Solar Rotation". Solar Physics. 12 (1): 23–51. Bibcode:1970SoPh...12...23H. doi:10.1007/BF02276562. S2CID 122140471.
- ^ Fitzpatrick, Richard (13 February 2006). "Introduction to Plasma Physics: A graduate course". The University of Texas at Austin. Archived from the original on 4 January 2010. Retrieved 4 October 2006.
- ^ Villata, Massimo (1992). "Angular momentum loss by a stellar wind and rotational velocities of white dwarfs". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 257 (3): 450–454. Bibcode:1992MNRAS.257..450V. doi:10.1093/mnras/257.3.450.
- ^ "A History of the Crab Nebula". ESO. 30 May 1996. Retrieved 3 October 2006.
- ^ "Properties of Pulsars". Frontiers of Modern Astronomy. Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester. Retrieved 17 August 2018.
- ^ Strobel, Nick (20 August 2007). "Properties of Stars: Color and Temperature". Astronomy Notes. Primis/McGraw-Hill, Inc. Archived from the original on 26 June 2007. Retrieved 9 October 2007.
- ^ Seligman, Courtney. "Review of Heat Flow Inside Stars". Self-published. Retrieved 5 July 2007.
- ^ a b "Main Sequence Stars". The Astrophysics Spectator. 16 February 2005. Retrieved 10 October 2006.
- ^ Zeilik, Michael A.; Gregory, Stephan A. (1998). Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics (4th ed.). Saunders College Publishing. p. 321. ISBN 978-0-03-006228-5.
- ^ Koppes, Steve (20 June 2003). "University of Chicago physicist receives Kyoto Prize for lifetime achievements in science". The University of Chicago News Office. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
- ^ a b Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (2017). "Chapter 11". An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108422161.
- ^ Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (2017). "Chapter 10". An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108422161.
- ^ "The Colour of Stars". Australian Telescope Outreach and Education. Archived from the original on 18 March 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2006.
- ^ "Astronomers Measure Mass of a Single Star – First Since the Sun". Hubble News Desk. 15 July 2004. Retrieved 24 May 2006.
- ^ Garnett, D. R.; Kobulnicky, H. A. (2000). "Distance Dependence in the Solar Neighborhood Age-Metallicity Relation". The Astrophysical Journal. 532 (2): 1192–1196. arXiv:astro-ph/9912031. Bibcode:2000ApJ...532.1192G. doi:10.1086/308617. S2CID 18473242.
- ^ Staff (10 January 2006). "Rapidly Spinning Star Vega has Cool Dark Equator". National Optical Astronomy Observatory. Archived from the original on 24 May 2019. Retrieved 18 November 2007.
- ^ Manduca, A.; Bell, R. A.; Gustafsson, B. (1977). "Limb darkening coefficients for late-type giant model atmospheres". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 61 (6): 809–813. Bibcode:1977A&A....61..809M.
- ^ Chugainov, P. F. (1971). "On the Cause of Periodic Light Variations of Some Red Dwarf Stars". Information Bulletin on Variable Stars. 520: 1–3. Bibcode:1971IBVS..520....1C.
- ^ Lawrence, J. L. (2019). Celestial Calculations: A Gentle Introduction to Computational Astronomy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. p. 252. ISBN 978-0-262-53663-9.
- ^ "Magnitude". National Solar Observatory – Sacramento Peak. Archived from the original on 6 February 2008. Retrieved 23 August 2006.
- ^ a b "Luminosity of Stars". Australian Telescope Outreach and Education. Archived from the original on 9 August 2014. Retrieved 13 August 2006.
- ^ Nicolson, Iain (1999). Unfolding Our Universe. Cambridge University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-521-59270-3.
- ^ Astounding Science Fact & Fiction. Street & Smith. 1960. p. 7.
- ^ Bestenlehner, Joachim M.; Crowther, Paul A.; Caballero-Nieves, Saida M.; Schneider, Fabian R. N.; Simón-Díaz, Sergio; Brands, Sarah A.; de Koter, Alex; Gräfener, Götz; Herrero, Artemio; Langer, Norbert; Lennon, Daniel J.; Maíz Apellániz, Jesus; Puls, Joachim; Vink, Jorick S. (17 October 2020). "The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Telescope/STIS – II. Physical properties of the most massive stars in R136". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 499 (2): 1918–1936. arXiv:2009.05136. Bibcode:2020MNRAS.499.1918B. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2801.
- ^ "Faintest Stars in Globular Cluster NGC 6397". HubbleSite. 17 August 2006. Retrieved 8 June 2006.
- ^ Richer, H. B. (18 August 2006). "Probing the Faintest Stars in a Globular Star Cluster". Science. 313 (5789): 936–940. arXiv:astro-ph/0702209. Bibcode:2006Sci...313..936R. doi:10.1126/science.1130691. PMID 16917054. S2CID 27339792.
- ^ Smith, Gene (16 April 1999). "Stellar Spectra". University of California, San Diego. Retrieved 12 October 2006.
- ^ Fowler, A. (April 1891). "The Draper Catalogue of Stellar Spectra". Nature. 45 (1166): 427–428. Bibcode:1892Natur..45..427F. doi:10.1038/045427a0.
- ^ Jaschek, Carlos; Jaschek, Mercedes (1990). The Classification of Stars. Cambridge University Press. pp. 31–48. ISBN 978-0-521-38996-9.
- ^ a b c MacRobert, Alan M. "The Spectral Types of Stars". Sky and Telescope. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013. Retrieved 19 July 2006.
- ^ Rix, Erika; Hay, Kim; Russell, Sally; Handy, Richard (2015). Solar Sketching: A Comprehensive Guide to Drawing the Sun. Springer. p. 43. ISBN 978-1-4939-2901-6.
- ^ "White Dwarf (wd) Stars". White Dwarf Research Corporation. Archived from the original on 8 October 2009. Retrieved 19 July 2006.
- ^ a b c d "Types of Variable". AAVSO. 11 May 2010. Archived from the original on 17 October 2018. Retrieved 20 August 2010.
- ^ "Cataclysmic Variables". NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. 1 November 2004. Retrieved 8 June 2006.
- ^ Samus, N. N.; Durlevich, O. V.; et al. (2009). "VizieR Online Data Catalog: General Catalogue of Variable Stars (Samus+ 2007–2013)". VizieR On-line Data Catalog: B/GCVS. Originally Published in: 2009yCat....102025S. 1. Bibcode:2009yCat....102025S.
- ^ Hansen, Carl J.; Kawaler, Steven D.; Trimble, Virginia (2004). Stellar Interiors. Springer. pp. 32–33. ISBN 978-0-387-20089-7.
- ^ a b c Schwarzschild, Martin (1958). Structure and Evolution of the Stars. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08044-4.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ "Formation of the High Mass Elements". Smoot Group. Retrieved 11 July 2006.
- ^ Huang, R. Q.; Yu, K. N. (1998). Stellar Astrophysics. Springer. p. 70. ISBN 978-981-3083-36-3.
- ^ a b "What is a Star?". NASA. 1 September 2006. Retrieved 11 July 2006.
- ^ Simon Newcomb; Edward Singleton Holden (1887). Astronomy for High Schools and Colleges. H. Holt. p. 278.
- ^ "The Glory of a Nearby Star: Optical Light from a Hot Stellar Corona Detected with the VLT" (Press release). ESO. 1 August 2001. Retrieved 10 July 2006.
- ^ "What Is the Sun's Corona? | NASA Space Place – NASA Science for Kids". spaceplace.nasa.gov. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
- ^ Burlaga, L. F.; et al. (2005). "Crossing the Termination Shock into the Heliosheath: Magnetic Fields". Science. 309 (5743): 2027–2029. Bibcode:2005Sci...309.2027B. doi:10.1126/science.1117542. PMID 16179471. S2CID 5998363.
- ^ Bahcall, John N. (29 June 2000). "How the Sun Shines". Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 30 August 2006.
- ^ a b c d Wallerstein, G.; et al. (1999). "Synthesis of the elements in stars: forty years of progress" (PDF). Reviews of Modern Physics. 69 (4): 995–1084. Bibcode:1997RvMP...69..995W. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.69.995. hdl:2152/61093. Retrieved 4 August 2006.
- ^ Woosley, S. E.; Heger, A.; Weaver, T. A. (2002). "The evolution and explosion of massive stars". Reviews of Modern Physics. 74 (4): 1015–1071. Bibcode:2002RvMP...74.1015W. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1015.
External links
[edit]- "How To Decipher Classification Codes". Astronomical Society of South Australia. Retrieved 20 August 2010.
- Kaler, James. "Portraits of Stars and their Constellations". University of Illinois. Retrieved 20 August 2010.
- Pickover, Cliff (2001). The Stars of Heaven. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-514874-9.
- Prialnick, Dina; et al. (2001). "Stars: Stellar Atmospheres, Structure, & Evolution". University of St. Andrews. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2010.
- "Query star by identifier, coordinates or reference code". SIMBAD. Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 20 August 2010.
Introduction
Etymology
The English word "star" traces its origins to Old English steorra, denoting a celestial body that appears as a luminous point in the sky. This evolved from Proto-Germanic sternǭ, a term shared across Germanic languages such as Old Norse stjarna and Old High German sterro. The root ultimately derives from the Proto-Indo-European h₂stḗr, which specifically meant "star," reflecting early human observations of the night sky.[4][5] Cognates of this Proto-Indo-European root appear in numerous other languages, demonstrating the widespread Indo-European linguistic connections to celestial terminology. In Latin, stella directly translates to "star" and was used to describe both fixed stars and wandering planets. Ancient Greek astḗr similarly means "star," serving as the foundation for words like astron (constellation) and influencing modern scientific terms. In Sanskrit, the related word tára or tárā refers to "star," often evoking ideas of crossing or shining lights in Vedic literature.[6] Over time, the term "star" underwent semantic shifts beyond literal astronomical meanings, incorporating metaphorical dimensions tied to fate and symbolism in ancient cultures. In Babylonian astronomical texts, stars featured prominently in omen interpretations, where they symbolized divine interventions or prophecies, as seen in cuneiform records associating celestial events with earthly outcomes. Within Indo-European traditions, this evolved into astrological connotations by the 13th century, where stars were thought to govern human destiny, giving rise to phrases like "star-crossed lovers" in later English usage.[4][7]Historical observations
Human observations of stars date back to ancient civilizations, where they served practical purposes such as navigation, agriculture, and timekeeping. The Babylonians maintained systematic records of celestial positions from around the 2nd millennium BCE, developing early star catalogs like the MUL.APIN compendium (ca. 1000 BCE) and mathematical models to predict planetary and stellar motions.[8] Similarly, ancient Egyptians incorporated stars into their religious and calendrical systems, observing constellations like Orion and Sirius to align pyramids and track the Nile's floods, though their records were less mathematical than the Babylonians'.[9] In ancient Greece, Hipparchus of Nicaea compiled the first comprehensive star catalog around 129 BCE, listing about 850 stars with their positions and brightnesses using equatorial coordinates, motivated by an observed nova that prompted him to detect proper motions.[10] Ptolemy of Alexandria synthesized earlier Greek and Babylonian knowledge in his Almagest (circa 150 CE), which included a star catalog of 1,022 entries derived largely from Hipparchus' work, providing longitudes, latitudes, and magnitudes for stars visible from the Mediterranean.[11] This geocentric model influenced astronomy profoundly, though during the medieval Islamic Golden Age (8th–15th centuries), scholars preserved and advanced it through translations and new observations. For instance, Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi compiled the Book of Fixed Stars in 964 CE, updating Ptolemy's catalog with over 1,000 stars, improved positions, and descriptions of southern constellations; later, Ulugh Beg's 15th-century catalog at Samarkand listed 1,018 stars with high precision, aiding global astronomical progress.[12][13] In the Renaissance, Tycho Brahe advanced precision without telescopes; from his observatory on Hven in the late 16th century, he measured star positions to within 1 arcminute using large quadrants and sextants, compiling a catalog of over 1,000 stars that revealed no detectable parallax, supporting vast stellar distances.[14] The invention of the telescope revolutionized stellar observation. In 1610, Galileo Galilei published Sidereus Nuncius, describing how his refractor resolved the Milky Way into myriad individual stars and revealed previously unseen stellar details in clusters like the Pleiades, challenging the Aristotelian view of an unchanging celestial realm.[15] In the 1780s, William Herschel conducted extensive sweeps of the northern sky with his large reflectors, counting stars in various directions to map the Milky Way's structure, concluding it formed a flattened disk with the Sun near its center and identifying thousands of new double stars and nebulae.[16] The late 19th century saw the dawn of stellar spectroscopy at Harvard College Observatory, where Edward Pickering initiated photographic surveys of stellar spectra in the 1880s. Williamina Fleming and Annie Jump Cannon refined this into the Harvard Classification Scheme by the 1890s, categorizing stars into spectral types (O, B, A, F, G, K, M) based on absorption lines, enabling the first systematic understanding of stellar temperatures and compositions.[17] In the 20th century, direct distance measurements became feasible. Friedrich Bessel measured the first stellar parallax in 1838 for 61 Cygni, yielding a distance of about 10 light-years and confirming stars' immense remoteness, though systematic parallax programs expanded dramatically with 20th-century instruments.[18] Edwin Hubble's observations in the 1920s at Mount Wilson Observatory, using the 100-inch Hooker telescope, identified Cepheid variables in Andromeda (M31), proving it an independent galaxy beyond the Milky Way and establishing the cosmic distance scale, with his 1929 velocity-distance relation indicating universal expansion.[19]Nomenclature and measurement
Designations
Stars are identified through a variety of systematic designations that facilitate their cataloging and reference in astronomical research. These naming conventions evolved from early modern efforts to standardize stellar nomenclature, providing unique identifiers based on position, brightness, or variability. Primary systems include constellation-based labels and numerical catalogs, which together cover most known stars. The Bayer designation, introduced by German astronomer Johann Bayer in his 1603 star atlas Uranometria, assigns Greek letters (starting with alpha for the brightest star) followed by the Latin genitive of the constellation name to prominent stars within each constellation. For example, Alpha Centauri denotes the brightest star in Centaurus. This system prioritizes apparent brightness and has remained a foundational method for naming visible stars, with letters extending to lowercase and Roman numerals when Greek letters are exhausted.[20] Complementing the Bayer system, the Flamsteed designation, developed by English Astronomer Royal John Flamsteed and published in 1725 in Historia Coelestis Britannica, uses Arabic numerals prefixed to the constellation name, ordered by increasing right ascension rather than brightness. An example is 61 Cygni, the 61st star in Cygnus by this sequence. Flamsteed cataloged nearly 3,000 stars, marking the first major telescope-based stellar atlas and providing positional data with 10-20 arcsecond precision. This numbering is particularly useful for fainter stars without Bayer labels.[21] Modern catalogs employ numerical identifiers for broader coverage. The Henry Draper Catalogue (HD), compiled at Harvard College Observatory under Edward C. Pickering and classified by Annie J. Cannon, was published in sections from 1918 to 1924 and lists spectral types for 225,300 stars brighter than magnitude 9, primarily in the northern sky. HD numbers are sequential by right ascension, serving as a standard reference for spectral classification. The Bright Star Catalogue (HR), originally the Harvard Revised Photometry (1908) and expanded by Yale University into its fifth edition in 1991, assigns HR numbers to 9,110 stars brighter than visual magnitude 6.5, including positions, proper motions, and photometry; for instance, HR 1713 is another name for Rigel.[22][23] For precise astrometry, the Hipparcos Catalogue, derived from the European Space Agency's Hipparcos mission (1989-1993), provides high-accuracy positions, parallaxes, and proper motions for 118,218 stars down to magnitude 12. Its companion, the Tycho-2 Catalogue (2000), extends coverage to 2,539,913 stars with somewhat lower precision but includes 99% of stars brighter than magnitude 11, enabling distance estimates via parallaxes. These catalogs use HIP numbers for Hipparcos entries and TYC for Tycho-2, revolutionizing stellar position measurements.[24] The Gaia mission, launched by the European Space Agency in 2013, has produced even more comprehensive catalogs. Its Data Release 3 (2022) includes astrometric data for 1,812,194,486 sources, with source identifiers (Gaia DR3 source_id) serving as unique designations. Gaia provides microarcsecond precision for positions and parallaxes, enabling accurate distances for billions of stars across the Milky Way.[25] Variable stars receive specialized designations under International Astronomical Union (IAU) conventions, managed through the General Catalogue of Variable Stars (GCVS). Names follow the Bayer/Flamsteed format where possible, but new variables are assigned letters from R to Z, then double letters RR to ZZ (skipping J), and finally V-numbers (e.g., V 335) in discovery order, suffixed by the three-letter constellation abbreviation; RR Lyrae, for instance, is the second variable named in Lyra. This system, established in the early 20th century, accommodates the growing list of detected variables and subtypes like RR Lyrae stars.[26] Host stars of exoplanets typically retain their existing catalog designations, such as HD 189733 for a star in the Henry Draper system, with planets appended as lowercase letters (b, c, etc.) in discovery order, starting from the innermost. The IAU occasionally approves proper names through public contests, like "Helvetios" for the star 51 Pegasi and "Dimidium" for its planet, but scientific nomenclature prioritizes catalog-based identifiers for consistency across databases.[27]Units of measurement
In astronomy, stellar distances are commonly measured using the light-year, defined as the distance light travels in vacuum over one Julian year (365.25 days), approximately 9.46 × 10^{12} kilometers.[28] Another key unit is the parsec (pc), which is the distance at which the average radius of Earth's orbit around the Sun (1 astronomical unit) subtends an angle of one arcsecond; this equals about 3.26 light-years or 3.086 × 10^{16} meters.[29][30] Parallax measurements in arcseconds are fundamental for determining these distances, as the parallax angle in arcseconds relates to distance in parsecs via , such that a parallax of 1 arcsecond corresponds exactly to 1 parsec.[30] Stellar masses are expressed relative to the solar mass , defined as approximately 1.989 × 10^{30} kilograms, providing a standard scale for comparing the gravitational influence and evolutionary paths of stars.[31] Luminosities are scaled to the solar luminosity watts, which quantifies the total energy output across all wavelengths for the Sun and allows normalization for other stars.[32] Similarly, stellar radii use the solar radius meters as the reference unit.[32] Effective temperatures of stars, which describe the temperature of a blackbody emitting the same total energy as the star, are measured in kelvin (K); for the Sun, this nominal value is 5772 K.[32] These solar-based units facilitate consistent comparisons across stellar populations, emphasizing relative scales over absolute measurements.Formation and evolution
Star formation
Stars form through the gravitational collapse of dense regions within giant molecular clouds (GMCs), which are cold (typically 10–20 K), massive structures of molecular hydrogen and dust with total masses of to solar masses. These clouds serve as stellar nurseries, where turbulence and self-gravity create overdensities that initiate collapse when the region's mass exceeds the Jeans mass, the critical scale at which gravitational attraction overcomes supporting thermal pressure. The Jeans mass is approximated by where is Boltzmann's constant, is the temperature, is the gravitational constant, is the mean molecular weight, is the mass of a hydrogen atom, and is the density; this criterion highlights how cooler, denser regions favor fragmentation into protostellar cores. The initial stages of collapse often manifest as Bok globules, compact, isolated dark clouds of gas and dust (typically 0.1–1 pc in size and 10–100 solar masses) that appear as silhouettes against brighter nebulae and represent early precursors to low-mass star formation. As collapse accelerates, a central protostar emerges, surrounded by a rotating envelope that conserves angular momentum and flattens into a protostellar disk; material from this disk accretes onto the protostar through an accretion shock, building its mass over a phase lasting approximately to years until the envelope is largely depleted.[33] During this embedded phase, protostars are obscured by dust and observable primarily in infrared wavelengths, with outflows and jets expelling excess angular momentum to sustain accretion. The masses of newly formed stars follow the initial mass function (IMF), which describes the number of stars per unit mass interval at birth; the seminal Salpeter IMF, derived from observations of field stars, takes the power-law form for stellar masses between about 0.4 and 10 solar masses, indicating a preference for lower-mass stars.[34] Environmental influences modulate this process: shock waves from nearby supernovae can compress molecular clouds, raising densities above the Jeans threshold and triggering collapse in regions that might otherwise remain stable.[35] Magnetic fields further regulate fragmentation by providing additional support against gravity, shaping cloud contraction into hourglass-like structures that promote clustered star formation while suppressing excessive fragmentation in some cases.[36] As of 2025, observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have unveiled intricate details of star-forming regions within giant molecular clouds, such as the W43 complex, enhancing models of fragmentation and accretion.[37]Main sequence phase
The main sequence phase represents the longest and most stable period in a star's life cycle, beginning when the protostar completes its contraction and achieves the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS), the point at which hydrogen fusion in the core fully sustains the star's luminosity.[38] This phase typically accounts for approximately 90% of a star's total lifetime, during which the star maintains a nearly constant luminosity, surface temperature, and radius while converting hydrogen into helium at its core.[39] For example, the Sun, a G-type main sequence star, is expected to remain in this phase for about 10 billion years, of which it has already completed roughly half.[40] The energy powering this phase arises from nuclear fusion reactions in the stellar core, primarily the proton-proton chain in low-mass stars like the Sun and the CNO cycle in high-mass stars, where core temperatures exceed those needed for the pp chain.[41] These processes generate the thermal pressure that counteracts gravitational collapse, enabling the star to settle into a balanced state. A key relationship governing main sequence stars is the mass-luminosity relation, approximated as for stars with masses less than about 20 solar masses (), meaning more massive stars are significantly more luminous and thus exhaust their hydrogen fuel more rapidly.[42] This stability is maintained through two fundamental principles: hydrostatic equilibrium, where the outward radiation pressure from fusion exactly balances the inward pull of gravity at every layer of the star, and efficient energy transport mechanisms—such as radiative diffusion in the core and radiative or convective processes in the outer layers—that carry fusion-generated heat to the surface without disrupting the structure.[43] As a result, main sequence stars exhibit a well-defined locus on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, spanning from low-mass, cool red dwarfs to high-mass, hot blue giants, with their positions determined largely by initial mass inherited from the formation process.Post-main sequence evolution
After the exhaustion of hydrogen in the stellar core, which marks the end of the main sequence phase lasting approximately 10 billion years for a star like the Sun, the star undergoes significant structural changes leading to its post-main-sequence evolution.[44] The inert helium core contracts under gravity, increasing its temperature and density, while hydrogen fusion shifts to a thin shell surrounding the core.[45] This shell burning releases energy that heats and expands the overlying envelope, causing the star to swell dramatically in radius—up to hundreds of times its main-sequence size—and cool at the surface, shifting its spectral type toward redder classes.[45] This phase is known as the red giant branch (RGB), during which the star ascends the rightward track on the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram, with luminosity increasing by factors of 10³ to 10⁴ compared to its main-sequence value due to the more efficient shell burning and reduced opacity in the expanded envelope.[45] For low- to intermediate-mass stars (roughly 0.8 to 8 solar masses), the core contraction continues until temperatures reach about 100 million Kelvin, triggering a helium flash—a brief, explosive ignition of helium fusion in the degenerate core.[44] The Sun, for instance, is expected to enter the RGB phase in approximately 5 billion years, expanding to engulf Mercury and Venus while its luminosity rises to around 2,000 times its current value.[46] Following the helium flash, low-mass stars (below about 2 solar masses) stabilize into the horizontal branch (HB) phase, where core helium burning proceeds steadily alongside hydrogen shell burning, maintaining a roughly constant luminosity while the star contracts and heats up.[47] On the HR diagram, HB stars trace a nearly horizontal path to the left of the RGB, appearing bluer and hotter, with this phase lasting tens of millions of years before helium depletion in the core.[44] The HB morphology varies with stellar mass and metallicity, influencing the distribution of RR Lyrae variables among these core-helium-burning objects.[47] Once core helium is exhausted, the star evolves onto the asymptotic giant branch (AGB), characterized by alternating shell burning of hydrogen and helium around an inert carbon-oxygen core, leading to further envelope expansion into a red supergiant-like state. Helium shell ignition occurs in periodic thermal pulses every 10,000 to 100,000 years, causing luminosity surges and driving strong mass loss through pulsation-enhanced dust-driven winds, which can eject up to 50% of the star's envelope over the AGB lifetime of about 1 million years. On the HR diagram, AGB tracks parallel the RGB but at higher luminosities (up to 10⁴–10⁵ solar luminosities), converging asymptotically toward the Hayashi limit for the star's mass.[44]End stages of stellar life
The end stages of a star's life are profoundly influenced by its initial mass, determining whether it culminates in a gentle ejection of outer layers or a cataclysmic explosion, leaving behind compact remnants such as white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes.[48] For stars with initial masses below approximately 8 solar masses (M☉), the evolution concludes with the formation of a planetary nebula and a white dwarf remnant, while more massive stars trigger core-collapse supernovae that can produce neutron stars or black holes.[49] These terminal phases release enormous energy, enriching the interstellar medium with heavy elements and shaping galactic chemical evolution.[50] Stars with initial masses less than 8 M☉ exhaust their nuclear fuel after ascending the red giant branch, where helium fusion in the core ceases, leading to the instability of the outer envelope. The star ejects its outer layers in a planetary nebula—a glowing shell of ionized gas—exposing the hot, dense core that collapses under gravity but is stabilized by electron degeneracy pressure.[51] This core becomes a white dwarf, typically composed of carbon and oxygen, with masses ranging from 0.2 to 1.4 M☉ and radii comparable to Earth's.[51] The maximum mass for a stable white dwarf, known as the Chandrasekhar limit, is approximately 1.4 M☉; beyond this threshold, electron degeneracy fails, potentially leading to further collapse if mass is accreted from a companion.[52] Over immense timescales exceeding the current age of the universe (about 13.8 billion years), white dwarfs radiate away their residual heat and contract further, theoretically cooling to black dwarfs—invisible, cold remnants with no significant luminosity.[51] For intermediate-mass stars between 8 and 20 M☉, the end stage involves the buildup of an iron core during advanced nuclear burning phases, as iron fusion absorbs rather than releases energy, halting the star's energy production. This triggers a rapid core collapse, where the core implodes in milliseconds, rebounding as a Type II supernova explosion that expels most of the star's mass at speeds up to 10% of the speed of light.[53] The remnant is a neutron star, formed when the collapsing core's protons and electrons combine into neutrons under extreme density, supported by neutron degeneracy pressure.[54] These objects have masses typically 1.1 to 2 M☉ and radii of about 10 to 20 kilometers, making them among the densest known forms of matter outside black holes.[55] Stars with initial masses exceeding 20 M☉ evolve more violently, often culminating in iron-core collapse supernovae similar to those of intermediate-mass stars but with greater energy output, frequently failing to fully explode and instead forming black holes through fallback accretion.[56] For extremely massive stars (initial masses around 130 to 250 M☉), pair-instability supernovae can occur: electron-positron pair production in the oxygen-burning core reduces radiation pressure, causing instability and complete disruption without a remnant, due to explosive oxygen ignition.[57] In cases where the explosion is incomplete, the core collapses beyond neutron degeneracy, forming a black hole with masses often exceeding 3 M☉. These events are rare but critical for understanding the upper mass limits of stellar remnants and the population of supermassive black holes in the early universe.[58]Stellar systems and distribution
Binary and multiple star systems
A significant fraction of stars in the Milky Way exist in gravitationally bound multiple systems, with at least 50% of solar-like stars having companions, rising to nearly 100% for massive stars.[59] Binary systems, consisting of two stars orbiting their common center of mass, are the most common configuration, while higher-order multiples like triples and quadruples occur less frequently but are crucial for understanding dynamical interactions.[60] Binary stars are classified observationally based on detection methods. Visual binaries are those where both components can be spatially resolved and their orbits tracked directly, such as Alpha Centauri A and B.[61] Spectroscopic binaries reveal their nature through periodic radial velocity variations in their spectra, indicating unseen orbital motion, and are subdivided into single-lined (one spectrum shows variation) and double-lined (both components visible).[60] Eclipsing binaries, a subset of spectroscopic systems, produce photometric light curves with periodic dips when one star occults the other, enabling precise measurements of radii and inclinations, as seen in Algol.[60] The dynamics of binary systems follow Kepler's laws adapted for two bodies. The third law relates the orbital period to the semi-major axis of the relative orbit via , where and are the stellar masses, allowing mass determination from observed periods and separations.[61] Close binaries, with separations small enough for tidal interactions, can experience Roche lobe overflow when the donor star expands to fill its Roche lobe—the gravitational equipotential surface defining the star's effective boundary—leading to mass transfer onto the companion. This overflow initiates stable or unstable mass exchange, altering the system's orbital parameters and stellar evolution.[60] In binary evolution, mass transfer profoundly influences stellar lifecycles, often differing from isolated stars. During the donor's expansion (e.g., post-main-sequence), accreted material can spin up the recipient, forming rapidly rotating stars, or trigger common envelope phases where the donor's envelope engulfs both cores, leading to orbital shrinkage via drag and potential ejection of the envelope.[60] In white dwarf binaries, steady accretion can drive the primary toward the Chandrasekhar limit (~1.4 solar masses), resulting in Type Ia supernovae when thermonuclear runaway ignites carbon-oxygen fusion. These events, arising from single-degenerate channels, provide standard candles for cosmology but require specific accretion rates to avoid nova outbursts. Multiple star systems, such as triples, typically adopt hierarchical architectures for long-term stability, with an inner binary orbited by a distant tertiary. Stability criteria, like the Mardling-Aarseth parameter, assess disruption risk based on mass ratios, eccentricities, and separations; systems with outer-to-inner period ratios exceeding ~10-20 are generally stable against chaotic ejections. Hierarchical triples facilitate complex dynamics, including Kozai-Lidov oscillations that couple eccentricities and inclinations, potentially driving close encounters or mergers, as observed in systems like HD 181068.[60]Distribution in galaxies
Stars in the Milky Way Galaxy are distributed across distinct structural components, each characterized by specific stellar populations reflecting different epochs of formation. The galactic disk, which dominates the visible structure, hosts a thin disk layer rich in young, metal-rich Population I stars, primarily formed in the spiral arms from recent star formation events. In contrast, the thicker disk component contains older stars with intermediate metallicities. The central bulge comprises predominantly old, metal-poor to metal-rich stars from an earlier generation, indicative of rapid formation in the galaxy's formative phase. The stellar halo, extending outward and encompassing ancient Population II stars with low metallicities ([Fe/H] < -1), represents the oldest component, likely built from accreted dwarf galaxies and early in-situ formation.[62][63][64] The distribution of stars is influenced by the galaxy's differential rotation, where inner regions orbit faster than outer ones, as described by the galactic rotation curve. This curve, derived from observations of stellar and gas kinematics, shows a nearly flat profile beyond a few kiloparsecs, implying a significant dark matter contribution to maintain orbital speeds. Local stellar motions are parameterized by the Oort constants, with A ≈ 14.7 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹ measuring shear and B ≈ -13 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹ indicating vorticity, based on recent Gaia data analyses. These constants quantify how stellar velocities vary with position in the disk, shaping the overall spatial arrangement.[65] Stars constitute only a small fraction of the Milky Way's total mass, approximately 1-2%, with the remainder dominated by dark matter and interstellar gas; the stellar mass is estimated at around 2.6 × 10¹⁰ solar masses within a total galactic mass of about 1.5 × 10¹² solar masses. Within the disk, stars are not uniformly distributed but clustered in loose stellar associations and more tightly bound open clusters, particularly in the spiral arms where star formation is concentrated. These clusters, numbering over 3,000 identified in surveys, serve as nurseries for young stars and tracers of galactic structure.[66][67] In extragalactic contexts, the distribution and density of stars in other galaxies are inferred from star formation rates (SFRs), often measured via ultraviolet (UV) observations that capture emission from young, massive stars. Surveys like those from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) reveal SFRs ranging from 0.1 to 100 solar masses per year in typical spirals, with higher rates in starbursts; for instance, UV luminosities correlate strongly with Hα emissions, enabling integrated estimates of stellar populations across diverse galaxy types. This approach highlights how stellar distributions vary with galaxy morphology, with disk-dominated systems showing concentrated star formation similar to the Milky Way.[68][69]Physical properties
Mass
Stellar mass, typically expressed in units of solar masses (M☉), is the total amount of matter in a star and serves as the fundamental parameter governing its structure, energy output, and evolutionary path. The lowest mass for a true star, capable of sustained hydrogen fusion in its core, is approximately 0.08 M☉; objects below this threshold are classified as brown dwarfs, which fail to ignite stable fusion. At the upper end, stellar masses rarely exceed about 150 M☉, as higher masses lead to instability from radiation pressure overpowering gravitational binding, causing excessive mass loss during formation.[70][71] Direct measurement of stellar masses is challenging and primarily relies on observations of binary star systems, where gravitational interactions reveal masses through orbital dynamics. In spectroscopic binaries, radial velocity variations from Doppler shifts provide the mass function, yielding the minimum mass (m sin i) for each component, though the inclination angle introduces uncertainty.[72] Eclipsing binaries offer more precise absolute masses by combining light curve analysis for radii and inclinations with spectroscopic data for velocities, enabling application of Kepler's laws to compute total mass sums and individual values.[73] For single stars, masses are often inferred indirectly from evolutionary models calibrated against observed binaries.[72] A star's mass profoundly influences its lifespan and energy production: more massive stars consume their nuclear fuel at a faster rate, resulting in shorter main-sequence lifetimes scaling roughly as τ ∝ M^{-2.5}, while also generating higher overall luminosities that accelerate evolution.[74] For instance, a star of 20 M☉ has a main-sequence lifetime of only about 10 million years, compared to the Sun's 10 billion years at 1 M☉.[74] The initial mass function (IMF) describes the distribution of stellar masses at birth within a population, originally formulated by Salpeter as a power-law (dN/dM ∝ M^{-α} with α ≈ 2.35 for masses above 0.5 M☉). Modern formulations, such as Kroupa's piecewise model, extend this to lower masses and reveal variations in the IMF across environments; for example, denser regions like galactic centers or young clusters show a flatter low-mass slope (more low-mass stars) or enhanced high-mass end compared to the Milky Way disk.[75] These environmental dependencies arise from differences in star formation physics, such as cloud density and turbulence, as evidenced in observations of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies.[76]Radius
Stellar radii encompass a broad spectrum, from approximately 0.01 for typical white dwarfs, which are compact remnants supported by electron degeneracy pressure, to over 1000 for red supergiants, the most extended phase in massive star evolution.[77][78] This range highlights how stellar structure adjusts to maintain hydrostatic equilibrium across diverse masses and stages, with white dwarfs shrinking under increasing core mass while supergiants balloon outward from internal energy transport dynamics. Measuring stellar radii requires determining the physical size from angular diameter and distance via the relation , where distances come from parallax data such as those from the Gaia mission. Direct techniques resolve by observing interference patterns in starlight. Long-baseline optical and infrared interferometry, using arrays like CHARA, measures diameters for hundreds of stars by combining light from separated telescopes.[79] Lunar occultations capture the star's diffraction pattern as it passes behind the Moon, yielding precise for occulted sources.[79] Intensity interferometry, historically pioneered at Narrabri, correlates intensity fluctuations to infer diameters without phase information.[79] For example, interferometric observations of Betelgeuse have produced angular diameters around 42–59 mas, translating to physical radii of roughly 764–1400 depending on the adopted distance and wavelength, though values incorporating circumstellar material may overestimate the photospheric size.[80][81] Indirect methods derive radii from spectroscopic analysis without resolving the disk. Spectral modeling fits observed line profiles, equivalent widths, and continuum shapes to atmospheric models, estimating effective temperature and surface gravity , then applying the relation with bolometric luminosity .[82] This approach is essential for distant or faint stars beyond direct resolution limits. Main-sequence radii depend primarily on mass, following an empirical relation derived from observations and stellar models balancing gravitational contraction against radiation pressure.[43] This scaling arises because higher-mass stars sustain hotter, more opaque interiors, leading to larger envelopes for stability. In giant and supergiant phases, radii inflate by factors of 100 or more due to shell burning: after core hydrogen exhaustion, an inert helium core contracts, igniting a surrounding hydrogen-burning shell that releases excess energy, heating and convectively expanding the envelope to vast scales.[83] The radius is closely tied to the star's mass through the mass-radius relation discussed in the mass section. Angular diameter measurements face resolution constraints from baseline length and wavelength , with theoretical limit . Optical interferometers achieve ~0.5–1 mas for nearby stars, enabling diameters down to ~0.2 mas, while radio VLBI reaches sub-mas but is limited to thermal or maser-emitting sources.[79][84] Atmospheric turbulence and finite telescope separation set practical limits around 1 mas for ground-based visible-light arrays.Temperature
The surface temperature of a star, often expressed as its effective temperature , represents the temperature of a blackbody that would emit the same total amount of energy as the star.[85] Stellar effective temperatures span a wide range, from approximately 2,000 K for cool giants to over 50,000 K for the hottest O-type stars.[86][87] Astronomers determine a star's effective temperature using the blackbody approximation derived from its luminosity , radius , and the Stefan-Boltzmann constant , via the formula where the surface area is approximated as that of a sphere.[85] This method provides an average temperature across the stellar photosphere, accounting for the star's total radiated energy flux.[88] One common observational proxy for temperature is the B-V color index, which measures the difference in brightness between blue (B) and visual (V) filters and correlates with stellar color. Hot stars exhibit negative or near-zero B-V values due to their blue appearance, while cool stars have positive values up to around +2.0, appearing redder.[89] For instance, the Sun has a B-V index of +0.65, corresponding to an effective temperature of about 5,800 K.[90] Empirical relations, such as those fitted from modern photometric data, allow direct conversion between B-V and , enabling temperature estimates from broadband observations.[90] Stellar temperature profoundly influences the ionization states of elements in the atmosphere, which in turn dictate the prominence of specific spectral lines. At temperatures above 10,000 K, high ionization levels favor lines from highly ionized species like He II, whereas cooler regimes below 6,000 K promote neutral or singly ionized atoms, such as those of calcium and iron, producing distinct absorption features.[91] These temperature-dependent ionization zones provide key diagnostics for analyzing stellar atmospheres through spectroscopy.[92]Chemical composition
Stars form primarily from primordial material produced by Big Bang nucleosynthesis, consisting of approximately 75% hydrogen and 25% helium by mass, with trace amounts of deuterium, helium-3, and lithium.[93] These light elements constitute the baseline composition for all stars, as heavier elements, collectively termed "metals" in astrophysics, were negligible in the early universe. Subsequent generations of stars enrich the interstellar medium with metals through nucleosynthetic processes, leading to the observed compositions in present-day stars. The total metallicity, denoted as , represents the mass fraction of all elements heavier than helium and typically ranges from about 0.008 to 0.02 in disk stars, with the Sun having .[94] Metallicity is often quantified using the iron-to-hydrogen ratio on a logarithmic scale, defined as , where denotes number abundances and the subscript refers to solar values; solar metallicity corresponds to .[94] This scale serves as a proxy for overall metal content, as iron is a common product of stellar nucleosynthesis and easily measured spectroscopically. The chemical abundances in stars are determined through high-resolution spectroscopy, which analyzes absorption lines in the stellar spectrum formed by atomic transitions in the photosphere. For the Sun, the Fraunhofer lines—dark absorption features first cataloged in the visible spectrum—provide detailed abundance measurements for dozens of elements, yielding the standard solar composition used as a reference for other stars.[94] Techniques such as equivalent width measurements and spectral synthesis compare observed line strengths to model atmospheres, accounting for temperature, gravity, and microturbulence to derive precise abundances.[95] Stellar populations exhibit significant variations in metallicity, reflecting their formation epochs and locations within galaxies. Population I stars, typically young and residing in the galactic disk, have high metallicities with ranging from -0.5 to +0.5, enriched by multiple generations of prior stellar evolution. In contrast, Population II stars, ancient and found in the galactic halo or bulge, display low metallicities with , often as low as -3 or below, due to formation from relatively pristine gas with minimal prior enrichment.[96] These differences highlight the progressive buildup of metals over cosmic time, with an observed age-metallicity relation where older stars generally possess lower abundances.[97]Age
Stars span a vast range of ages, from as young as approximately years in newly formed open clusters to as old as about 13 billion years in globular clusters, reflecting the extended timeline of stellar birth and evolution within galaxies.[98] These age extremes provide critical benchmarks for understanding stellar populations, with young stars often observed in active star-forming regions and ancient ones preserving records of early galactic history. Determining the age of individual stars typically involves comparing their positions on the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram to theoretical isochrones, which are evolutionary tracks representing stars of the same age but varying masses.[99] Isochrone fitting accounts for factors like mass and composition to estimate ages, particularly for main-sequence stars, though uncertainties arise from incomplete stellar models.[100] For pre-main-sequence low-mass stars, the lithium depletion boundary (LDB) method identifies the mass threshold below which lithium is fully depleted in stellar interiors due to convection, marking a sharp transition observable in color-magnitude diagrams; this technique yields precise ages for young clusters, such as 20-35 million years for NGC 2547.[101] Gyrochronology offers another approach for main-sequence stars, exploiting the empirical relation between a star's rotation period, color (as a proxy for mass), and age, where slower rotation indicates greater age due to magnetic braking; this method is calibrated for ages from about 0.67 to 14 billion years and achieves uncertainties around 15%.[102][103] In star clusters, where all members share a common formation epoch, ages are derived more robustly from collective properties. The main-sequence turnoff point—the hottest point where stars depart the main sequence to evolve into giants—indicates the cluster's age, as more massive stars exhaust their hydrogen fuel faster; for instance, globular clusters exhibit turnoffs corresponding to ages exceeding 10 billion years.[104] Complementary to this, white dwarf cooling sequences provide an independent lower limit on cluster age by measuring the faint end of the white dwarf luminosity function, where cooling times from post-main-sequence remnants align with cluster histories, as demonstrated in M67 with a cooling age of about 4.3 billion years.[105] These methods often converge to confirm ages, enhancing reliability for ancient populations. Stellar ages also inform broader galactic chemical evolution, particularly through the age-metallicity relation, which reveals a gradient where older, inner-disk populations tend to have lower metallicities due to slower enrichment over time.[106] This gradient, traced by open clusters spanning 1 million to several billion years, implies radial variations in star formation efficiency and gas inflows, with metallicity increasing toward younger, outer regions.[107] Such patterns underscore how stellar ages constrain models of disk evolution, linking chronological data to elemental abundances briefly noted in chemical composition studies.Rotation
Stellar rotation rates span a wide range, typically quantified by the projected equatorial velocity , where is the inclination of the rotation axis relative to the line of sight. For the Sun, a main-sequence G-type star, the equatorial rotation velocity is approximately 2 km/s, corresponding to a sidereal rotation period of about 25 days.[108] In contrast, young or massive stars can rotate much faster; Be stars, for example, often exhibit values approaching 400 km/s near their critical rotation limits. These rates are primarily measured through spectroscopic analysis of Doppler broadening in absorption lines, as the star's rotation causes differential redshifting on the receding limb and blueshifting on the approaching limb, widening the line profiles proportionally to .[109] For stars with prominent surface features like starspots, rotation periods can be inferred from periodic photometric variations as these spots rotate into and out of view, with the Sun providing a well-studied example of a ~25-day equatorial period. Over a star's lifetime, rotation evolves via angular momentum transport and loss mechanisms. During the protostellar phase, conservation of angular momentum during contraction is balanced by interactions with the accretion disk, which extracts excess spin to regulate early rotation rates and enable disk formation.[110] On the main sequence, magnetic braking from stellar winds slows rotation, following the empirical Skumanich law where for solar-type stars, reflecting torque-driven spin-down over billions of years.[111] Fast rotation induces structural distortions, transforming stars into oblate spheroids with equatorial radii up to 50% larger than polar radii at critical speeds, as centrifugal forces counteract gravity more effectively at the equator.[112] In rapidly rotating massive stars, this oblateness promotes anisotropic mass loss, with enhanced equatorial ejection due to reduced effective gravity, leading to the formation of circumstellar decretion disks in Be stars.[113]Magnetic activity
Stellar magnetic activity arises from the generation and evolution of magnetic fields within stars, primarily driven by internal dynamo processes. These fields vary widely in strength, from the Sun's global dipole field of approximately 1–2 gauss (G) to localized concentrations in sunspots reaching 1–4 kilogauss (kG). In other main-sequence stars, average surface fields range from a few gauss in solar-like stars to up to 20–30 kG in chemically peculiar A-type stars, while neutron stars known as magnetars exhibit the most extreme fields, on the order of 10¹⁴–10¹⁵ G.[114][115] Magnetic fields in stars are generated through two primary mechanisms. In stars with convective envelopes, such as the Sun and other cool main-sequence stars, dynamo action in the convective zone converts kinetic energy from plasma motions into magnetic energy via the α-ω dynamo process, where helical turbulence (α-effect) and differential rotation (ω-effect) amplify and shear the field. In contrast, stars with radiative interiors, like intermediate-mass main-sequence stars, may retain "fossil" fields—relic magnetic configurations inherited from the star's formation and stabilized by stable stratification, potentially reaching strengths of 10–100 kG without ongoing dynamo activity.[116][117][118] Observations of stellar magnetic fields rely on spectroscopic techniques, particularly the Zeeman effect, which causes splitting and polarization in spectral lines proportional to the field strength and geometry. High-resolution spectropolarimetry reveals these signatures, enabling mapping of surface field topologies, as demonstrated in surveys of cool stars showing predominantly poloidal fields of 1–25 G. Additionally, magnetic activity manifests in non-thermal emissions: radio bursts from coherent electron cyclotron maser processes and X-ray flares from coronal heating, often exceeding solar levels in active stars like RS CVn binaries.[119][120] Many stars exhibit cyclic magnetic activity analogous to the Sun's 11-year Schwabe cycle, where field polarity reverses and sunspot-like features modulate over decades, driven by dynamo wave propagation. These cycles, observed via photometric variability and chromospheric indicators like Ca II H&K lines, scale with rotation period—faster rotators show shorter cycles and stronger fields—extending to solar-like oscillations in Kepler targets spanning 2–20 years.[116][121]Kinematics
Kinematics describes the motions of stars through space relative to the observer and the broader galactic framework. These motions are quantified through three primary components: proper motion, radial velocity, and the resulting space velocity, which together reveal the three-dimensional trajectories of stars. Measurements of these velocities are essential for understanding stellar populations, galactic structure, and dynamical evolution.[122] Proper motion refers to the apparent angular displacement of a star across the celestial sphere with respect to more distant background stars, caused by the star's transverse velocity perpendicular to the line of sight. It is typically expressed in arcseconds per year and is measured by comparing the star's position over time using astrometric observations from telescopes like Hipparcos or Gaia. Most stars exhibit small proper motions on the order of 0.1 arcseconds per year, but nearby stars can show larger values due to their proximity. For instance, Barnard's Star, located about 6 light-years from the Sun, has the highest known proper motion of 10.3 arcseconds per year, making it appear to shift noticeably against the stellar backdrop over decades.[122][123] Radial velocity measures the component of a star's motion along the line of sight, toward or away from the observer, and is determined spectroscopically via the Doppler effect. The shift in the wavelength of spectral lines is given by the formula , where is the radial velocity, is the speed of light, is the change in wavelength, and is the rest wavelength; positive values indicate recession and negative values approach. This non-relativistic approximation holds for stellar velocities much less than , with typical values ranging from tens to hundreds of km/s. Instruments like HARPS or ESPRESSO achieve precisions down to meters per second, enabling detection of subtle motions.[124] The full space velocity of a star is obtained by combining proper motion, radial velocity, and distance (via parallax) to compute the three-dimensional velocity vector. In the galactic coordinate system, this is often decomposed into components , , and , where is directed toward the galactic center, follows the galactic rotation, and points toward the north galactic pole, all relative to the local standard of rest (LSR). These components typically range from -100 to +100 km/s for disk stars near the Sun, with the Sun's motion relative to the LSR being approximately km/s.[125] Velocity dispersion, the standard deviation of these components within a stellar population, quantifies the random motions and increases with age due to dynamical heating; for example, old disk stars show dispersions of about 50 km/s in each direction, compared to 20 km/s for young stars. Stars follow bound orbits within the Milky Way's gravitational potential, influenced by the galactic disk, bulge, and dark matter halo, leading to epicyclic motions around circular orbits. The orbital dynamics are governed by the galaxy's rotation curve, with stars in the solar neighborhood orbiting at about 220 km/s. The local escape velocity, beyond which stars would be unbound from the galaxy, is approximately 550 km/s at the Sun's position, derived from the high-velocity tail of stellar distributions observed by Gaia. Hypervelocity stars exceeding this threshold, often ejected from the galactic center, provide probes of the potential's depth.[126]Radiation and energy output
Luminosity
Luminosity is the total amount of energy a star radiates per unit time, typically measured in watts or in solar units (L⊙, where the Sun's luminosity is 3.828 × 10²⁶ W).[127] For a star approximated as a blackbody, this total radiated power is given by the Stefan-Boltzmann law: where is the star's radius, is its effective surface temperature, and is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.670 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴).[128] This relation highlights how luminosity scales with the product of surface area and the fourth power of temperature, providing a fundamental link between a star's physical size, temperature, and energy output.[129] Stellar luminosities span an enormous range, from about 10⁻⁴ L⊙ for the faintest red dwarfs to over 10⁶ L⊙ for the most massive hypergiants.[88] These extremes illustrate the diversity in stellar energy production, with low-mass stars emitting far less power due to their compact size and cooler surfaces, while hypergiants achieve immense outputs through rapid nuclear fusion in their cores.[130] For main-sequence stars, luminosity primarily depends on mass, following the empirical mass-luminosity relation , where more massive stars fuse hydrogen at higher rates, producing proportionally greater energy.[42] However, this scaling varies with evolutionary stage; for instance, during later phases like the red giant branch, stars can temporarily increase luminosity by factors of thousands as they expand and their outer layers heat up, diverging from the main-sequence relation.[131] To determine true bolometric luminosity from observations, astronomers apply a bolometric correction, which accounts for the fraction of total energy emitted outside a specific wavelength band by integrating the star's spectral energy distribution across all wavelengths.[132] This correction is essential because most measurements capture only portions of the spectrum, such as visible light, and its value depends on the star's temperature and spectral type—for cooler stars, it is more negative due to greater infrared emission.[133]Magnitude and brightness
The apparent magnitude of a star quantifies its brightness as observed from Earth, providing a logarithmic measure of the flux received by an observer.[134] This scale is inverse, such that brighter objects have smaller or negative magnitudes, while fainter ones have larger positive values; for instance, Vega serves as the zero-point reference with an apparent magnitude of 0 in the visual band.[135] The relationship between apparent magnitude and flux is given by the formula , where is a constant zero-point determined by the photometric system.[136] Absolute magnitude represents a star's intrinsic brightness, standardized as the apparent magnitude it would have if placed at a distance of 10 parsecs from Earth, allowing direct comparisons of stellar luminosities independent of distance.[137] The conversion from apparent to absolute magnitude uses the formula , where is the distance in parsecs.[138] This distance modulus quantifies the dimming effect due to distance and is particularly applied to nearby stars whose distances are measured via trigonometric parallax, where and is the parallax angle in arcseconds.[139] Interstellar extinction complicates these measurements by dimming a star's apparent magnitude through absorption and scattering of light by dust grains along the line of sight, with the effect being more pronounced at shorter wavelengths.[140] Corrections for extinction are typically made using color excesses, such as , which measures the reddening of a star's colors compared to unreddened standards of the same spectral type, enabling the estimation of total visual extinction via standard interstellar laws.[141] These adjustments ensure that observed magnitudes more accurately reflect a star's true brightness at its distance.Classification
Spectral classification
The Morgan-Keenan (MK) system, introduced in 1943, provides a standardized framework for classifying stars based on the absorption and emission lines in their spectra, which primarily reflect the physical conditions in stellar atmospheres such as temperature and ionization states.[142] This two-dimensional system uses spectral types to denote temperature and luminosity classes for size and evolutionary stage, but the core spectral sequence—O, B, A, F, G, K, M—arranges stars from hottest to coolest, with O-type stars reaching surface temperatures of approximately 30,000–50,000 K and M-type stars around 2,500–3,500 K.[143][144] The sequence correlates with the dominance of specific spectral features: O stars show strong absorption lines of ionized helium (He II) due to high ionization at extreme temperatures, while M stars exhibit prominent molecular bands of titanium oxide (TiO) from cooler atmospheres where molecules form readily.[144] Each main spectral type is further subdivided into 10 numerical subclasses from 0 (hottest within the type) to 9 (coolest), allowing finer distinctions based on the ratios of line strengths, such as the gradual weakening of He II lines and strengthening of neutral hydrogen (Balmer) lines from O to A types.[145] For example, the Sun is classified as G2, indicating a mid-G type star with surface temperature around 5,800 K, where calcium (Ca II) lines like the H and K lines are prominent alongside moderate hydrogen absorption.[145] These subclasses enable precise temperature estimates, as the line ratios evolve systematically with thermal conditions, forming the basis for quantitative spectral analysis.[146] In the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram, which plots stellar luminosity against temperature (or spectral type), main sequence stars illustrate a clear trend where earlier (hotter) spectral types like O and B correspond to higher luminosities due to their larger radii and higher fusion rates, while later types like K and M are fainter.[147] This integration highlights how spectral classification reveals evolutionary patterns, with the main sequence spanning from luminous O stars to dim M dwarfs.[130] Certain stars deviate from the standard OBAFGKM sequence due to unusual compositions or evolutionary states, leading to peculiar classes. Carbon stars, denoted as type C, are cool giants with enhanced carbon-to-oxygen ratios, displaying strong absorption bands from carbon molecules like C₂ (Swan bands) and CN, which alter their red spectra compared to typical M stars.[148] Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars represent another peculiar category, characterized by hot temperatures (often >20,000 K) and spectra dominated by broad emission lines of helium, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, resulting from intense stellar winds that eject material at speeds exceeding 2,000 km/s and expose the star's hot core.[149] These classes, though rare, provide critical insights into advanced stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis.[150]Luminosity classes
Luminosity classes form a key component of the Morgan-Keenan (MK) system of stellar classification, which categorizes stars not only by their surface temperature through spectral types but also by their intrinsic luminosity and evolutionary stage. Introduced in 1943, this system uses Roman numerals to denote luminosity, allowing astronomers to distinguish stars of similar temperatures but different brightness levels, such as main-sequence dwarfs from evolved giants and supergiants.[151] These classes reflect a star's position in its evolutionary life cycle, from hydrogen-fusing main-sequence stars to post-main-sequence giants and beyond.[152] The luminosity classes are assigned as follows, with finer subdivisions for supergiants:| Class | Description |
|---|---|
| Ia-0 | Hypergiants (extremely luminous supergiants) |
| Ia | Bright supergiants |
| Iab | Intermediate supergiants |
| Ib | Supergiants |
| II | Bright giants |
| III | Giants |
| IV | Subgiants |
| V | Main-sequence (dwarfs) |
| VI | Subdwarfs |
| VII | White dwarfs (sometimes denoted as D) |
Variability
Types of variable stars
Variable stars are categorized into intrinsic and extrinsic types based on whether their brightness variations arise from internal physical processes or external geometric effects. The General Catalogue of Variable Stars (GCVS) provides the standard classification system, encompassing dozens of subtypes defined by light curve shapes, periods, and amplitudes.[156] Intrinsic variables change brightness due to processes within the star itself. Pulsating variables, the largest group, exhibit periodic expansions and contractions that alter their size and temperature, producing regular light curves. Key subtypes include:- δ Scuti stars: High-amplitude pulsators with short periods of 0.01 to 0.25 days, often found in main-sequence or subgiant phases.[156]
- RR Lyrae stars: Short-period variables with periods of 0.2 to 1 day, commonly observed in globular clusters as population II objects; they serve as standard candles for nearby galaxies due to their consistent absolute magnitudes.[156][157]
- Classical Cepheids: Yellow supergiants with periods of 1 to 70 days; their period-luminosity (P-L) relation correlates longer periods with higher luminosities, enabling precise distance measurements across the Milky Way and beyond.[156][158]
- Mira variables: Long-period giants with periods of 80 to 1000 days, displaying large amplitude variations (up to 10 magnitudes); they represent evolved asymptotic giant branch stars.[156][159]
- RV Tauri stars: Supergiants with periods of 30 to 150 days, characterized by alternating deep and shallow minima in their light curves.[156]
Variability mechanisms
Stellar variability arises from several physical mechanisms that alter a star's energy output or surface distribution, leading to observed changes in brightness. These include pulsations driven by internal instabilities, rotational modulation from surface features, explosive eruptions on compact objects, and stochastic fluctuations from turbulent processes. Each mechanism operates under specific stellar conditions, producing distinct patterns of variability. Pulsations cause periodic changes in a star's radius and temperature, resulting in luminosity variations. The primary driver is the κ-mechanism, where opacity (κ) in ionized layers increases during compression, trapping heat and expanding the envelope; subsequent cooling reduces opacity, allowing energy release and contraction. [161] In classical Cepheid variables, this process leads to radius changes of approximately 10% over their pulsation cycles. [162] Rotational variability stems from the modulation of stellar brightness as dark, cooler starspots rotate into and out of the observer's line of sight. Starspots form due to magnetic activity and exhibit significant temperature contrasts relative to the surrounding photosphere, reducing local emission. For instance, on the Sun, sunspot umbrae reach temperatures of about 4000 K compared to the photospheric average of 5800 K. [163] This contrast causes periodic dips in flux with periods matching the star's rotation rate. Eruptive variability occurs in systems involving compact objects, such as classical novae, where hydrogen-rich material accretes onto a white dwarf surface. Accumulation triggers a thermonuclear runaway in the accreted shell, causing a rapid brightness increase and ejection of material. [164] These outbursts propel mass at velocities around 1000 km/s, dispersing the envelope and fading the star's light over weeks to months. [165] Stochastic variability manifests as irregular, non-periodic fluctuations, particularly in evolved stars like red giants, due to turbulent convection in their extended envelopes. Large-scale convective cells stochastically excite and dampen surface motions, producing low-frequency noise in brightness akin to granulation on a grander scale. [166] This mechanism dominates in stars with vigorous outer convection zones, leading to amplitudes that can exceed 0.1 magnitudes over timescales of days to years. [167]Internal structure
Stellar layers
Stars consist of distinct layers that define their internal structure, from the dense central core to the tenuous outer atmosphere. These layers vary in composition, temperature, density, and energy transport mechanisms, depending on the star's mass and evolutionary stage. In main-sequence stars like the Sun, the core occupies about 20-25% of the radius, while the outer atmosphere is extremely thin compared to the total size.[168] The core is the innermost region where nuclear fusion generates the star's energy. It features extreme conditions, with temperatures around 15 million K and densities up to 150 g/cm³ in solar-type stars, enabling hydrogen-to-helium fusion. In low-mass main-sequence stars, the core comprises roughly 20% of the radius; in white dwarfs, the entire star is a degenerate core supported by electron degeneracy pressure rather than thermal forces.[2] Surrounding the core are the radiative and convective zones, which handle energy transport outward. In low-mass stars like the Sun, a radiative zone extends from about 25% to 70% of the radius, where photons diffuse slowly through high opacity; beyond this lies a convective envelope comprising the outer 30%, where hot plasma rises and cools in circulating cells. High-mass stars reverse this configuration, with a convective core and radiative envelope, due to differences in opacity and temperature gradients.[169] The photosphere forms the star's visible "surface," a thin layer roughly 100-500 km thick where optical photons escape freely. Its temperature averages 5,800 K in the Sun, dropping to lower densities of about 10^{-7} g/cm³. Convection from below produces granulation—bright, rising hot cells about 700-1,000 km in diameter, surrounded by darker cooling lanes—creating a mottled appearance observable in high-resolution images.[170] Above the photosphere lies the chromosphere, a sparse layer 2,000-3,000 km thick with temperatures rising from 4,000 K to 20,000 K or more. It emits strong ultraviolet lines like Ca II and Mg II, indicating dynamic activity driven by magnetic fields. The transition region, a narrow interface about 100 km thick, sharply heats the plasma from chromospheric to coronal temperatures, up to 500,000 K.[171][172] The outermost corona extends millions of kilometers, with temperatures of 1-2 million K despite low densities (10^{-15} g/cm³ or less), far exceeding the photosphere's heat. This hot, ionized plasma originates phenomena like the solar wind and emits X-rays, with structure shaped by magnetic fields. In other stars, coronal properties scale with activity levels, being more prominent in younger or rapidly rotating ones.[171][172][173]Energy transport processes
In stars, energy generated in the core is transported outward to the surface primarily through two mechanisms: radiative diffusion and convection. Radiative diffusion dominates in regions where the temperature gradient is shallow enough for photons to carry the energy flux without triggering instability, while convection takes over in zones requiring a steeper gradient, involving bulk motion of plasma. These processes operate within the stellar layers, such as the radiative core and convective envelopes, to maintain hydrostatic equilibrium.[168] Radiative diffusion occurs as photons are repeatedly absorbed and re-emitted by stellar material, effectively random-walking outward due to the temperature gradient. The energy flux in this regime is given by the diffusion approximation: where is the speed of light, is the opacity (measuring the material's resistance to photon passage), is the density, is the radiation constant, and is the temperature. This can be rewritten as , highlighting the dependence on the temperature gradient . Opacity arises from processes like Thomson scattering on electrons or bound-free transitions, and it is often averaged using the Rosseland mean to account for frequency-dependent absorption across the spectrum. In the Sun's radiative interior, for instance, electron scattering opacity (in cm²/g) limits the mean free path of photons to about 1 cm, resulting in a random walk time of roughly 170,000 years for energy to reach the surface.[174][175][176] Convection becomes the dominant transport mechanism in regions where radiative diffusion alone cannot carry the required flux, leading to instability. Hotter, less dense plasma rises buoyantly as adiabatic bubbles, while cooler, denser material sinks, efficiently mixing energy outward. This occurs when the radiative temperature gradient exceeds the adiabatic gradient, as defined by the Schwarzschild criterion for convective instability: , where is the gradient needed for radiative transport and is the adiabatic value, approximately 0.4 for an ideal monatomic gas. In the mixing-length theory, the convective flux is approximated as , with the mixing length scaling as the pressure scale height. This process is crucial in the Sun's outer convection zone, spanning from about 0.7 to 1 solar radius.[175][174][177] The boundaries between radiative and convective zones, known as zonal boundaries, mark transitions where . In the Sun, the tachocline represents such a boundary at the base of the convection zone, around 0.7 solar radii, where rotation shifts from differential in the convective envelope to rigid in the radiative interior, influencing dynamo-generated magnetic fields. This thin shear layer, about 0.05 solar radii thick, arises from the interplay of meridional circulation and magnetic confinement.[178][179] In massive stars, convective motions often penetrate beyond these formal boundaries through overshoot mixing, where plumes overshoot into stable regions by a distance typically parameterized as , with and the pressure scale height. This enhances mixing of fresh fuel into the core, extending main-sequence lifetimes and altering evolutionary tracks, as seen in models of stars with masses above 8 solar masses where convective cores dominate early evolution.[180][174]Nuclear fusion processes
Hydrogen fusion
Hydrogen fusion is the primary nuclear process that powers main-sequence stars, converting hydrogen into helium in their cores and releasing energy through the mass defect in accordance with Einstein's equation .[181] This process occurs at temperatures around 10-15 million Kelvin, where quantum tunneling enables protons to overcome electrostatic repulsion.[182] In low-mass stars like the Sun, the proton-proton (pp) chain dominates, while in more massive stars, the CNO cycle takes precedence due to its stronger temperature dependence.[41] The pp-chain consists of several branches, all achieving the net reaction , where four protons form a helium nucleus, two positrons, two electron neutrinos, and energy primarily from gamma rays and positron annihilation.[181] The main branch, ppI, proceeds as follows: This branch accounts for about 70% of reactions in the Sun and produces low-energy neutrinos (~0.42 MeV) from the first step.[182] The ppII branch (~28%) involves , followed by electron capture (emitting ~0.86 MeV neutrinos), and . The rarer ppIII branch (~0.02%) branches from , then (high-energy ~10 MeV neutrinos), and .[182] These branches produce distinct neutrino spectra, enabling indirect probing of the solar core.[183] In stars with masses greater than about 1.3 solar masses, core temperatures exceed 16 million Kelvin, making the CNO cycle the primary hydrogen-burning mechanism, as its rate scales as compared to for the pp-chain.[41] The cycle is catalytic, using carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen as intermediaries to achieve the same net reaction , without net consumption of CNO nuclei.[184] The main CN cycle steps are: Neutrinos from (~1.2 MeV) and (~1.7 MeV) branches provide signatures of CNO activity.[184] Early detections of solar neutrinos revealed a deficit compared to predictions from solar models, known as the solar neutrino problem.[183] This was resolved by neutrino oscillations, where electron neutrinos transform into muon or tau flavors en route to Earth via the Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effect in solar matter, confirmed by experiments like Super-Kamiokande and SNO.[183] Borexino has since detected low-energy pp-chain neutrinos and CNO neutrinos, validating fusion models.[183]Advanced fusion stages
In evolved stars, particularly those with masses exceeding about 8 solar masses, the exhaustion of hydrogen fuel in the core leads to gravitational contraction and subsequent ignition of helium fusion. This process, known as the triple-alpha process, occurs in the helium-burning cores of these stars at temperatures around 100 million Kelvin. It involves the fusion of three helium-4 nuclei (alpha particles) to form carbon-12, primarily through the intermediate formation of unstable beryllium-8: The overall reaction releases approximately 7.3 MeV of energy per carbon nucleus formed, enabling the star to maintain hydrostatic equilibrium during this phase.[185][186] Following helium exhaustion, the core contracts further, raising temperatures to about 600 million Kelvin (6 × 10^8 K) and igniting carbon burning in massive stars. This stage involves reactions between carbon-12 nuclei, producing primarily neon-20, magnesium-24, and sodium-23 through channels such as 12C + 12C → 20Ne + 4He, 12C + 12C → 23Na + p, and 12C + 12C → 24Mg + γ. These reactions release energy via the conversion of mass into binding energy, with the process occurring in convective cores of stars above 8 solar masses.[187] Subsequent advanced burning stages in massive stars (initial masses greater than about 8 solar masses) involve neon, oxygen, and silicon as fuels, progressively building heavier elements toward the iron peak. Oxygen burning at temperatures of 1.5–2.6 billion Kelvin (1.5–2.6 × 10^9 K) fuses oxygen-16 nuclei to produce silicon-28, sulfur-32, and other intermediates like argon and calcium. Silicon burning follows at around 3 billion Kelvin (3 × 10^9 K), where silicon-28 and its products undergo a complex network of alpha captures, proton captures, and photodisintegrations to form iron-group nuclei such as nickel-56 (which decays to iron-56). This alpha chain—successive captures of helium-4 nuclei onto lighter seeds—continues building nuclei up to iron-56, the most tightly bound stable isotope. At the iron peak, further fusion reactions become endothermic (Q < 0), with photodisintegration dominating over synthesis, as the energy required to disassemble nuclei exceeds that released, marking the end of energy-generating fusion.[188][189]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/star#Etymology_1