Hubbry Logo
OxycodoneOxycodoneMain
Open search
Oxycodone
Community hub
Oxycodone
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Oxycodone
Oxycodone
from Wikipedia

Oxycodone
Clinical data
Pronunciation/ɒksiˈkdn/
Trade namesRoxicodone, OxyContin, others
Other namesEukodal, eucodal; dihydrohydroxycodeinone, 7,8-dihydro-14-hydroxycodeinone, 6-deoxy-7,8-dihydro-14-hydroxy-3-O-methyl-6-oxomorphine[1]
AHFS/Drugs.comMonograph
MedlinePlusa682132
License data
Pregnancy
category
Dependence
liability
High[3]
Addiction
liability
High[4]
Routes of
administration
By mouth, sublingual, intramuscular, intravenous, intranasal, subcutaneous, transdermal, rectal, epidural[5]
Drug classOpioid
ATC code
Legal status
Legal status
Pharmacokinetic data
BioavailabilityBy mouth: 60–87%[7][8]
Protein binding45%[7]
MetabolismLiver: mainly CYP3A, and, to a much lesser extent, CYP2D6 (~5%);[7] 95% metabolized (i.e., 5% excreted unchanged)[10]
MetabolitesNoroxycodone (25%)[9][10]
Noroxymorphone (15%, free and conjugated)[9][10]
Oxymorphone (11%, conjugated)[9][10]
• Others (e.g., minor metabolites)[10]
Onset of actionIRTooltip Instant release: 10–30 minutes[8][10]
CRTooltip controlled release: 1 hour[11]
Elimination half-lifeIR: 2–3 hours[10][8]
CR: 4.5 hours[12]
Duration of actionIR: 3–6 hours[10]
CR: 10–12 hours[13]
ExcretionUrine (83%)[7]
Identifiers
  • (5R,9R,13S,14S)-4,5α-Epoxy-14-hydroxy-3-methoxy-17-methylmorphinan-6-one
CAS Number
PubChem CID
IUPHAR/BPS
DrugBank
ChemSpider
UNII
KEGG
ChEBI
ChEMBL
CompTox Dashboard (EPA)
ECHA InfoCard100.000.874 Edit this at Wikidata
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC18H21NO4
Molar mass315.369 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)
Melting point219 °C (426 °F)
Solubility in water166 (HCl)
  • O=C4[C@@H]5Oc1c2c(ccc1OC)C[C@H]3N(CC[C@]25[C@@]3(O)CC4)C
  • InChI=1S/C18H21NO4/c1-19-8-7-17-14-10-3-4-12(22-2)15(14)23-16(17)11(20)5-6-18(17,21)13(19)9-10/h3-4,13,16,21H,5-9H2,1-2H3/t13-,16+,17+,18-/m1/s1 checkY
  • Key:BRUQQQPBMZOVGD-XFKAJCMBSA-N checkY
  (verify)

Oxycodone, sold under the brand name Roxicodone and OxyContin (which is the extended-release form) among others, is a semi-synthetic opioid used medically for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. It is highly addictive[14] and is a commonly abused drug.[15][16] It is usually taken by mouth, and is available in immediate-release and controlled-release formulations.[15] Onset of pain relief typically begins within fifteen minutes and lasts for up to six hours with the immediate-release formulation.[15] In the United Kingdom, it is available by injection.[17] Combination products are also available with paracetamol (acetaminophen), ibuprofen, naloxone, naltrexone, and aspirin.[15]

Common side effects include euphoria, constipation, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, drowsiness, dizziness, itching, dry mouth, and sweating.[15] Side effects may also include addiction and dependence, substance abuse, irritability, depression or mania, delirium, hallucinations, hypoventilation, gastroparesis, bradycardia, and hypotension.[15] Those allergic to codeine may also be allergic to oxycodone.[15] Use of oxycodone in early pregnancy appears relatively safe.[15] Opioid withdrawal may occur if rapidly stopped.[15] Oxycodone acts by activating the μ-opioid receptor.[18] When taken by mouth, it has roughly 1.5 times the effect of the equivalent amount of morphine.[19]

Oxycodone was originally produced from the opium poppy opiate alkaloid thebaine in 1916 in Germany. One year later, it was used medically for the first time in Germany.[20] Oxycodone is a therapeutic alternative on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines.[21] It is available as a generic medication.[15] In 2023, it was the 49th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States, with more than 13 million prescriptions.[22][23] A number of abuse-deterrent formulations are available, such as in combination with naloxone or naltrexone.[16][24]

Medical uses

[edit]

Oxycodone is used for managing moderate to severe acute or chronic pain when other treatments are not sufficient.[15] It may improve quality of life in certain types of pain.[25] Numerous studies have been completed, and the appropriate use of this compound does improve the quality of life of patients with long term chronic pain syndromes.[26][27][28]

Oxycodone is available as a controlled-release tablet.[29] A 2006 review found that controlled-release oxycodone is comparable to immediate-release oxycodone, morphine, and hydromorphone in management of moderate to severe cancer pain, with fewer side effects than morphine. The author concluded that the controlled-release form is a valid alternative to morphine and a first-line treatment for cancer pain.[29] In 2014, the European Association for Palliative Care recommended oxycodone by mouth as a second-line alternative to morphine by mouth for cancer pain.[30]

In children between 11 and 16, the extended-release formulation is FDA-approved for the relief of cancer pain, trauma pain, or pain due to major surgery (for those already treated with opioids, who can tolerate at least 20 mg per day of oxycodone) – this provides an alternative to Duragesic (fentanyl), the only other extended-release opioid analgesic approved for children.[31]

Oxycodone, in its extended-release form or in combination with naloxone, is sometimes used off-label in the treatment of severe and refractory restless legs syndrome.[32]

Available forms

[edit]
Both sides of a single 10mg OxyContin pill.

Oxycodone is available in a variety of formulations for by mouth or under the tongue:[8][33][34][35]

  • Immediate-release oxycodone (OxyFast, OxyIR, OxyNorm, Roxicodone)
  • Controlled-release oxycodone (OxyContin, Xtampza ER) – 10–12 hour duration[13]
  • Oxycodone tamper-resistant (OxyContin OTR)[36]
  • Immediate-release oxycodone with paracetamol (acetaminophen) (Percocet, Endocet, Roxicet, Tylox)
  • Immediate-release oxycodone with aspirin (Endodan, Oxycodan, Percodan, Roxiprin)
  • Immediate-release oxycodone with ibuprofen (Combunox)[37]
  • Controlled-release oxycodone with naloxone (Targin, Targiniq, Targinact)[38] – 10–12 hour duration[13]
  • Controlled-release oxycodone with naltrexone (Troxyca) – 10–12 hour duration[13][39]
A liquid solution containing 10mg of oxycodone per 1ml

In the US, oxycodone is only approved for use by mouth, available as tablets and oral solutions. Parenteral formulations of oxycodone (brand name OxyNorm) are also available in other parts of the world, however, and are widely used in the European Union.[40][41][42] In Spain, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, oxycodone is approved for intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) use. When first introduced in Germany during World War I, both IV and IM administrations of oxycodone were commonly used for postoperative pain management of Central Powers soldiers.[5]

Side effects

[edit]
Main side effects of oxycodone[43]
Two tablets (10 mg) of oxycodone and safety blisters

The most common side effects of oxycodone include delayed gastric emptying, euphoria, anxiolysis (a reduction in anxiety), feelings of relaxation, and respiratory depression.[44] Common side effects of oxycodone include constipation (23%), nausea (23%), vomiting (12%), somnolence (23%), dizziness (13%), itching (13%), dry mouth (6%), and sweating (5%).[44][45] Less common side effects (experienced by less than 5% of patients) include loss of appetite, nervousness, abdominal pain, diarrhea, urinary retention, dyspnea, and hiccups.[46]

Most side effects generally become less intense over time, although issues related to constipation are likely to continue for the duration of use.[47] Chronic use of this compound and associated constipation issues can become very serious, and have been implicated in life-threatening bowel perforations.[48] A number of specific medications including naloxegol[49] have been developed to address opioid induced constipation.

Oxycodone in combination with naloxone in managed-release tablets has been formulated to both deter abuse and reduce opioid-induced constipation.[50]

Dependence and withdrawal

[edit]
OxyContin tablets crushed into powder for insufflation (snorting). Notice the tablets at the top with the coating removed

The risk of experiencing severe withdrawal symptoms is high if a patient has become physically dependent and discontinues oxycodone abruptly. Medically, when the drug has been taken regularly over an extended period, it is withdrawn gradually rather than abruptly. People who regularly use oxycodone recreationally or at higher than prescribed doses are at even higher risk of severe withdrawal symptoms. The symptoms of oxycodone withdrawal, as with other opioids, may include "anxiety, panic attack, nausea, insomnia, muscle pain, muscle weakness, fevers, and other flu-like symptoms".[51][52]

Withdrawal symptoms have also been reported in newborns whose mothers had been either injecting or orally taking oxycodone during pregnancy.[53]

Hormone levels

[edit]

As with other opioids, chronic use of oxycodone (particularly with higher doses) can often cause concurrent hypogonadism (low sex hormone levels).[54][55]

Overdose

[edit]

In high doses, overdoses, or in some persons not tolerant to opioids, oxycodone can cause shallow breathing, slowed heart rate, cold/clammy skin, pauses in breathing, low blood pressure, constricted pupils, circulatory collapse, respiratory arrest, and death.[46]

In 2011, it was the leading cause of drug-related deaths in the U.S.[56] However, from 2012 onwards, heroin and fentanyl have become more common causes of drug-related deaths.[56]

Oxycodone overdose has also been described to cause spinal cord infarction in high doses and ischemic damage to the brain, due to prolonged hypoxia from suppressed breathing.[57]

Interactions

[edit]

Oxycodone is metabolized by the enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. Therefore, its clearance can be altered by inhibitors and inducers of these enzymes, increasing and decreasing half-life, respectively.[41] (For lists of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inhibitors and inducers, see here and here, respectively.) Natural genetic variation in these enzymes can also influence the clearance of oxycodone, which may be related to the wide inter-individual variability in its half-life and potency.[41]

Ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir greatly increase plasma concentrations of oxycodone in healthy human volunteers due to inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6.[58] Rifampicin greatly reduces plasma concentrations of oxycodone due to strong induction of CYP3A4.[59] There is also a case report of fosphenytoin, a CYP3A4 inducer, dramatically reducing the analgesic effects of oxycodone in a chronic pain patient.[60] Dosage or medication adjustments may be necessary in each case.[58][59][60]

Pharmacology

[edit]

Pharmacodynamics

[edit]
Oxycodone (and metabolite) at opioid receptors
Compound Affinities (KiTooltip Inhibitor constant) Ratio Ref.
MORTooltip μ-Opioid receptor DORTooltip δ-Opioid receptor KORTooltip κ-Opioid receptor MOR:DOR:KOR
Oxycodone 18 nM 958 nM 677 nM 1:53:38 [5]
Oxymorphone 0.78 nM 50 nM 137 nM 1:64:176 [61]

Equianalgesic doses[62][63][64]
Compound Route Dose
Codeine PO 200 mg
Hydrocodone PO 20–30 mg
Hydromorphone PO 7.5 mg
Hydromorphone IV 1.5 mg
Morphine PO 30 mg
Morphine IV 10 mg
Oxycodone PO 20 mg
Oxycodone IV 10 mg
Oxymorphone PO 10 mg
Oxymorphone IV 1 mg

Oxycodone, a semi-synthetic opioid, is a highly selective full agonist of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR).[40][41] This is the main biological target of the endogenous opioid neuropeptide β-endorphin.[18] Oxycodone has low affinity for the δ-opioid receptor (DOR) and the κ-opioid receptor (KOR), where it is an agonist similarly.[40][41] After oxycodone binds to the MOR, a G protein-complex is released, which inhibits the release of neurotransmitters by the cell by decreasing the amount of cAMP produced, closing calcium channels, and opening potassium channels.[65] Opioids like oxycodone are thought to produce their analgesic effects via activation of the MOR in the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) and rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM).[66] Conversely, they are thought to produce reward and addiction via activation of the MOR in the mesolimbic reward pathway, including in the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, and ventral pallidum.[67][68] Tolerance to the analgesic and rewarding effects of opioids is complex and occurs due to receptor-level tolerance (e.g., MOR downregulation), cellular-level tolerance (e.g., cAMP upregulation), and system-level tolerance (e.g., neural adaptation due to induction of ΔFosB expression).[69]

Taken orally, 20 mg of immediate-release oxycodone is considered to be equivalent in analgesic effect to 30 mg of morphine,[70][71] while extended release oxycodone is considered to be twice as potent as oral morphine.[72]

Similarly to most other opioids, oxycodone increases prolactin secretion, but its influence on testosterone levels is unknown.[40] Unlike morphine, oxycodone lacks immunosuppressive activity (measured by natural killer cell activity and interleukin 2 production in vitro); the clinical relevance of this has not been clarified.[40]

Active metabolites

[edit]

A few of the metabolites of oxycodone have also been found to be active as MOR agonists, some of which notably have much higher affinity for (as well as higher efficacy at) the MOR in comparison.[73][74][75] Oxymorphone possesses 3- to 5-fold higher affinity for the MOR than does oxycodone,[10] while noroxycodone and noroxymorphone possess one-third of and 3-fold higher affinity for the MOR, respectively,[10][75] and MOR activation is 5- to 10-fold less with noroxycodone but 2-fold higher with noroxymorphone relative to oxycodone.[76] Noroxycodone, noroxymorphone, and oxymorphone also have longer biological half-lives than oxycodone.[73][77]

Pharmacology of oxycodone and metabolites[44][76]
Compound KiTooltip Inhibitor constant EC50Tooltip Half-maximal effective concentration Cmax AUC
Oxycodone 16.0 nM 343 nM 23.2 ± 8.6 ng/mL 236 ± 102 ng/h/mL
Oxymorphone 0.36 nM 42.8 nM 0.82 ± 0.85 ng/mL 12.3 ± 12 ng/h/mL
Noroxycodone 57.1 nM 1930 nM 15.2 ± 4.5 ng/mL 233 ± 102 ng/h/mL
Noroxymorphone 5.69 nM 167 nM ND ND
Ki is for [3H]diprenorphine displacement. (Note that diprenorphine is a non-selective opioid receptor ligand, so this is not MOR-specific.) EC50 is for hMOR1 GTPyS binding. Cmax and AUC levels are for 20 mg CR oxycodone.

However, despite the greater in vitro activity of some of its metabolites, it has been determined that oxycodone itself is responsible for 83.0% and 94.8% of its analgesic effect following oral and intravenous administration, respectively.[74] Oxymorphone plays only a minor role, being responsible for 15.8% and 4.5% of the analgesic effect of oxycodone after oral and intravenous administration, respectively.[74] Although the CYP2D6 genotype and the route of administration result in differential rates of oxymorphone formation, the unchanged parent compound remains the major contributor to the overall analgesic effect of oxycodone.[74] In contrast to oxycodone and oxymorphone, noroxycodone and noroxymorphone, while also potent MOR agonists, poorly cross the blood–brain barrier into the central nervous system, and for this reason are only minimally analgesic in comparison.[73][76][74][75]

κ-opioid receptor

[edit]

In 1997, a group of Australian researchers proposed (based on a study in rats) that oxycodone acts on KORs, unlike morphine, which acts upon MORs.[78] Further research by this group indicated the drug appears to be a high-affinity κ2b-opioid receptor agonist.[79] However, this conclusion has been disputed, primarily on the basis that oxycodone produces effects that are typical of MOR agonists.[80] In 2006, research by a Japanese group suggested the effect of oxycodone is mediated by different receptors in different situations.[81] Specifically in diabetic mice, the KOR appears to be involved in the antinociceptive effects of oxycodone, while in nondiabetic mice, the μ1-opioid receptor seems to be primarily responsible for these effects.[81][82]

Pharmacokinetics

[edit]

Instant-release absorption profiles and Tmax

[edit]

Oxycodone can be administered orally, intravenously, via intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous injection. Along with rectal, sublingual, buccal or intranasal drug delivery. The bioavailability of oral administration of oxycodone averages within a range of 60 to 87%, with rectal administration yielding the same results; Intranasal administration of oxycodone has a bioavailability of ~77%, the same half life as oral oxycodone, along with faster Tmax[83] previously reported as 47% for nasal spray administration due to the solution in the study exceeding the 0.3- to 0.4-mL nasal mucosa limit.[84] Buccal bioavailability ~55%, Tmax ~60 min.[85] Sublingual bioavailability 20% (non alkalized) ~55% (alkalized) Tmax ~60 minutes.[86][87]

After a dose of conventional (immediate-release) oral oxycodone, the onset of action is 10 to 30 minutes,[10][8] and peak plasma levels of the drug are attained within roughly 30 to 60 minutes;[10][8][73] in contrast, after a dose of OxyContin (an oral controlled-release formulation), peak plasma levels of oxycodone occur in about three hours.[46] Mean serum concentration of controlled-release oxycodone peaks at 78 ng/ml at 1 hour and drops to 20 ng/ml at 8 hours and under 10 ng/ml at 12 hours.[88] The duration of instant-release oxycodone is 3 to 6 hours, although this can be variable depending on the individual.[10]

Distribution

[edit]

Oxycodone has a volume of distribution of 2.6L/kg,[89] in the blood it is distributed to skeletal muscle, liver, intestinal tract, lungs, spleen, and brain.[46] At equilibrium the unbound concentration in the brain is threefold higher than the unbound concentration in blood.[90] Conventional oral preparations start to reduce pain within 10 to 15 minutes on an empty stomach; in contrast, OxyContin starts to reduce pain within one hour.[15]

Metabolism

[edit]

The metabolism of oxycodone in humans occurs in the liver mainly via the cytochrome P450 system and is extensive (about 95%) and complex, with many minor pathways and resulting metabolites.[10][91] Around 10% (range 8–14%) of a dose of oxycodone is excreted essentially unchanged (unconjugated or conjugated) in the urine.[10] The major metabolites of oxycodone are noroxycodone (70%), noroxymorphone ("relatively high concentrations"),[44] and oxymorphone (5%).[73][76] The immediate metabolism of oxycodone in humans is as follows:[10][12][92]

In humans, N-demethylation of oxycodone to noroxycodone by CYP3A4 is the major metabolic pathway, accounting for 45% ± 21% of a dose of oxycodone, while O-demethylation of oxycodone into oxymorphone by CYP2D6 and 6-ketoreduction of oxycodone into 6-oxycodols represent relatively minor metabolic pathways, accounting for 11% ± 6% and 8% ± 6% of a dose of oxycodone, respectively.[10][40]

Several of the immediate metabolites of oxycodone are subsequently conjugated with glucuronic acid and excreted in the urine.[10] 6α-Oxycodol and 6β-oxycodol are further metabolized by N-demethylation to nor-6α-oxycodol and nor-6β-oxycodol, respectively, and by N-oxidation to 6α-oxycodol-N-oxide and 6β-oxycodol-N-oxide (which can subsequently be glucuronidated as well).[10][12] Oxymorphone is also further metabolized, as follows:[10][12][92]

The first pathway of the above three accounts for 40% of the metabolism of oxymorphone, making oxymorphone-3-glucuronide the main metabolite of oxymorphone, while the latter two pathways account for less than 10% of the metabolism of oxymorphone.[92] After N-demethylation of oxymorphone, noroxymorphone is further glucuronidated to noroxymorphone-3-glucuronide.[92]

Because oxycodone is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system in the liver, its pharmacokinetics can be influenced by genetic polymorphisms and drug interactions concerning this system, as well as by liver function.[46] Some people are fast metabolizers of oxycodone, while others are slow metabolizers, resulting in polymorphism-dependent alterations in relative analgesia and toxicity.[93][94] While higher CYP2D6 activity increases the effects of oxycodone (owing to increased conversion into oxymorphone), higher CYP3A4 activity has the opposite effect and decreases the effects of oxycodone (owing to increased metabolism into noroxycodone and noroxymorphone).[95] The dose of oxycodone must be reduced in patients with reduced liver function.[96]

Elimination

[edit]

The clearance of oxycodone is 0.8 L/min.[89] Oxycodone and its metabolites are mainly excreted in urine.[97] Therefore, oxycodone accumulates in patients with kidney impairment.[96] Oxycodone is eliminated in the urine 10% as unchanged oxycodone, 45% ± 21% as N-demethylated metabolites (noroxycodone, noroxymorphone, noroxycodols), 11 ± 6% as O-demethylated metabolites (oxymorphone, oxymorphols), and 8% ± 6% as 6-keto-reduced metabolites (oxycodols).[97][73]

Duration of action

[edit]

Oral oxycodone has a half-life of 4.5 hours.[89] The manufacturer of OxyContin (a controlled-release preparation of oxycodone), Purdue Pharma, claimed in its 1992 patent application that the duration of action of OxyContin is 12 hours in "90% of patients". Purdue has never performed any clinical studies in which OxyContin was given at more frequent intervals. In a separate filing, Purdue claimed that controlled-release oxycodone "provides pain relief in said patient for at least 12 hours after administration".[98] However, in 2016, an investigation by the Los Angeles Times found that "the drug wears off hours early in many people", inducing symptoms of opiate withdrawal and intense cravings for OxyContin. One doctor, Lawrence Robbins, told journalists that over 70% of his patients would report that OxyContin would only provide 4–7 hours of relief. Doctors in the 1990s often would switch their patients to a dosing schedule of once every eight hours when patients complained that the duration of action for OxyContin was too short to be taken only twice a day.[98][99]

Purdue strongly discouraged the practice: Purdue's medical director Robert Reder wrote to one doctor in 1995 that "OxyContin has been developed for [12-hour] dosing...I request that you not use a [8-hourly] dosing regimen." Purdue repeatedly released memos to its sales representatives ordering them to remind doctors not to deviate from a 12-hour dosing schedule. One such memo read, "There is no Q8 dosing with OxyContin... [8-hour dosing] needs to be nipped in the bud. NOW!!"[98] The journalists who covered the investigation argued that Purdue Pharma has insisted on a 12-hour duration of action for nearly all patients, despite evidence to the contrary, to protect the reputation of OxyContin as a 12-hour drug and the willingness of health insurance and managed care companies to cover OxyContin despite its high cost relative to generic opiates such as morphine.[98]

Purdue sales representatives were instructed to encourage doctors to write prescriptions for larger 12-hour doses instead of more frequent dosing.[100] An August 1996 memo to Purdue sales representatives in Tennessee entitled "$$$$$$$$$$$$$ It's Bonus Time in the Neighborhood!" reminded the representatives that their commissions would dramatically increase if they were successful in convincing doctors to prescribe larger doses. Los Angeles Times journalists argue using interviews from opioid addiction experts that such high doses of OxyContin spaced 12 hours apart create a combination of agony during opiate withdrawal (lower lows) and a schedule of reinforcement that relieves this agony fostering addiction.[98]

As of 2024, the prescribing information for OxyContin still specifies a controversial 12-hour dosing schedule - which experts say promotes addiction - as the only option;[6][101] it also still states, "there are no well-controlled clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy with dosing more frequently than every 12 hours."[6]

Chemistry

[edit]

Oxycodone's chemical name is derived from codeine. The chemical structures are very similar, differing only in that

  • Oxycodone has a hydroxy group at carbon-14 (codeine has just a hydrogen in its place)
  • Oxycodone has a 7,8-dihydro feature. Codeine has a double bond between those two carbons; and
  • Oxycodone has a carbonyl group (as in ketones) in place of the hydroxyl group of codeine.

It is also similar to hydrocodone, differing only in that it has a hydroxyl group at carbon-14.[96]

Biosynthesis

[edit]

In terms of biosynthesis, oxycodone has been found naturally in nectar extracts from the orchid family Epipactis helleborine; together along with another opioid: 3-{2-{3-{3-benzyloxypropyl}-3-indol, 7,8-didehydro- 4,5-epoxy-3,6-d-morphinan.[102]

Thodey et al., 2014 introduce a microbial compound manufacturing system for compounds including oxycodone.[103] The Thodey platform produces both natural and semisynthetic opioids including this one.[103] This system uses Saccharomyces cerevisiae with transgenes from Papaver somniferum (the opium poppy) and Pseudomonas putida to turn a thebaine input into other opiates and opioids.[103]

Detection in biological fluids

[edit]

Oxycodone or its major metabolites may be measured in blood or urine to monitor for clearance, non-medical use, confirm a diagnosis of poisoning, or assist in a medicolegal death investigation. Many commercial opiate screening tests cross-react appreciably with oxycodone and its metabolites, but chromatographic techniques can easily distinguish oxycodone from other opiates.[104]

History

[edit]

Martin Freund and (Jakob) Edmund Speyer of the University of Frankfurt in Germany published the first synthesis of oxycodone from thebaine in 1916.[105][106] When Freund died, in 1920, Speyer wrote his obituary for the German Chemical Society.[107] Speyer, born to a Jewish family in Frankfurt am Main in 1878, became a victim of the Holocaust. He died on 5 May 1942, the second day of deportations from the Lodz Ghetto; his death was noted in the ghetto's chronicle.[108]

The first clinical use of the drug was documented in 1917, the year after it was first developed.[106][13] It was first introduced to the U.S. market in May 1939. In early 1928, Merck introduced a combination product containing scopolamine, oxycodone, and ephedrine under the German initials for the ingredients SEE, which was later renamed Scophedal (SCOpolamine, ePHEDrine, and eukodAL) in 1942. It was last manufactured in 1987 but can be compounded. This combination is essentially an oxycodone analogue of the morphine-based "twilight sleep", with ephedrine added to reduce circulatory and respiratory effects.[109] The drug became known as the "Miracle Drug of the 1930s" in Continental Europe and elsewhere and it was the Wehrmacht's choice for a battlefield analgesic for a time. The drug was expressly designed to provide what the patent application and package insert referred to as "very deep analgesia and profound and intense euphoria" as well as tranquillisation and anterograde amnesia useful for surgery and battlefield wounding cases. Oxycodone was allegedly chosen over other common opiates for this product because it had been shown to produce less sedation at equianalgesic doses compared to morphine, hydromorphone (Dilaudid), and hydrocodone (Dicodid).[110]

During Operation Himmler, Skophedal was also reportedly injected in massive overdose into the prisoners dressed in Polish Army uniforms in the staged incident on 1 September 1939 which opened the Second World War.[109][111]

The personal notes of Adolf Hitler's physician, Theodor Morell, indicate Hitler received repeated injections of "Eukodal" (oxycodone; produced by Merck) and Scophedal, as well as Dolantin (pethidine), codeine, and morphine less frequently; oxycodone could not be obtained after late January 1945.[112][113]

In the United States, the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) was passed by the United States Congress and signed into law by President Richard Nixon on 27 October 1970.[114] The passing of the CSA resulted in all products containing oxycodone being classified as a Schedule II controlled substance.[115]

In the early 1990s, Purdue Pharma, a privately held company based in Stamford, Connecticut, developed a controlled-release version of oxycodone: the prescription painkiller OxyContin ("contin" being short for "continuous", reflecting a longer duration of pain relief).[116] It was approved by the FDA in 1995 after no long-term studies and no assessment of its addictive capabilities.[117] David Kessler, the FDA commissioner at the time, later said of the approval of OxyContin: "No doubt it was a mistake. It was certainly one of the worst medical mistakes, a major mistake."[118] Upon its release in 1995, OxyContin was hailed as a medical breakthrough, a long-lasting narcotic that could help patients with moderate to severe pain. The drug became a blockbuster and has reportedly generated some US$35 billion in revenue for Purdue.[116]

Society and culture

[edit]

Opioid epidemic

[edit]

Oxycodone, like other opioid analgesics, tends to induce feelings of euphoria, relaxation, and reduced anxiety in those who are occasional users.[119] These effects make it one of the most commonly abused pharmaceutical drugs in the United States.[120] The abuse of Oxycodone, as well as related opioids more broadly, is not unique to the United States and it is a common drug of abuse globally.[121][122]

United States

[edit]

Oxycodone is the most widely recreationally used opioid in America. In the United States, more than 12 million people use opioid drugs recreationally.[123] The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that about 11 million people in the U.S. consume oxycodone in a non-medical way annually.[124]

Opioids were responsible for 49,000 of the 72,000 drug overdose deaths in the U.S. in 2017.[125] In 2007, about 42,800 emergency room visits occurred due to "episodes" involving oxycodone.[126] In 2008, recreational use of oxycodone and hydrocodone was involved in 14,800 deaths. Some of the cases were due to overdoses of the acetaminophen component, resulting in fatal liver damage.[127]

In September 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released updated labeling guidelines for long-acting and extended-release opioids requiring manufacturers to remove moderate pain as an indication for use, instead stating the drug is for "pain severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long term opioid treatment".[128] The updated labeling does not restrict physicians from prescribing opioids for moderate pain, as needed.[123]

Reformulated OxyContin is causing some recreational users to change to heroin, which is cheaper and easier to obtain.[129]

Lawsuits
[edit]

In October 2017, The New Yorker published a story on Mortimer Sackler and Purdue Pharma regarding their ties to the production and manipulation of the oxycodone markets.[116] The article links Raymond and Arthur Sackler's business practices with the rise of direct pharmaceutical marketing and eventually to the rise of addiction to oxycodone in the United States. The article implies that the Sackler family bears some responsibility for the opioid epidemic in the United States.[130] In 2019, The New York Times ran a piece confirming that Richard Sackler, the son of Raymond Sackler, told company officials in 2008 to "measure our performance by Rx's by strength, giving higher measures to higher strengths".[131] This was verified with documents tied to a lawsuit – which was filed by the Massachusetts attorney general, Maura Healey – claiming that Purdue Pharma and members of the Sackler family knew that high doses of OxyContin over long periods would increase the risk of serious side effects, including addiction.[132] Despite Purdue Pharma's proposal for a US$12 billion settlement of the lawsuit, the attorneys general of 23 states, including Massachusetts, rejected the settlement offer in September 2019.[133]

Australia

[edit]

The non-medical use of oxycodone existed since the early 1970s, but by 2015, 91% of a national sample of injecting drug users in Australia had reported using oxycodone, and 27% had injected it in the last six months.[134]

Canada

[edit]

Opioid-related deaths in Ontario had increased by 242% from 1969 to 2014.[135] By 2009 in Ontario there were more deaths from oxycodone overdoses than from cocaine overdoses.[136] Deaths from opioid pain relievers had increased from 13.7 deaths per million residents in 1991 to 27.2 deaths per million residents in 2004.[137] The non-medical use of oxycodone in Canada became a problem. Areas where oxycodone is most problematic are Atlantic Canada and Ontario, where its non-medical use is prevalent in rural towns and in many smaller to medium-sized cities.[138] Oxycodone is also widely available across Western Canada, but methamphetamine and heroin are more serious problems in larger cities, while oxycodone is more common in rural towns. Oxycodone is diverted through doctor shopping, prescription forgery, pharmacy theft, and overprescription.[138][139]

The recent formulations of oxycodone, particularly Purdue Pharma's crush-, chew-, injection- and dissolve-resistant OxyNEO[140] which replaced the banned OxyContin product in Canada in early 2012, have led to a decline in the recreational use of this opiate but have increased the recreational use of the more potent drug fentanyl.[141] According to a Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse study quoted in Maclean's magazine, there were at least 655 fentanyl-related deaths in Canada in five years.[142]

In Alberta, the Blood Tribe police claimed that from the fall of 2014 through January 2015, oxycodone pills or a lethal fake variation referred to as Oxy 80s[143] containing fentanyl made in illegal labs by members of organized crime were responsible for ten deaths on the Blood Reserve, which is located southwest of Lethbridge, Alberta.[144] Province-wide, approximately 120 Albertans died from fentanyl-related overdoses in 2014.[143]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Prescriptions of Oxycodone rose in Scotland by 430% between 2002 and 2008, prompting fears of usage problems that would mirror those of the United States.[145] The first known death due to overdose in the UK occurred in 2002.[146]

Preventive measures

[edit]

In August 2010, Purdue Pharma reformulated their long-acting oxycodone line, marketed as OxyContin, using a polymer, Intac,[88] to make the pills more difficult to crush or dissolve in water[147] to reduce non-medical use of OxyContin.[148] Inactive ingredients/excipients are butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), hypromellose, polyethylene glycol 400, polyethylene oxide, magnesium stearate, and titanium dioxide.[149][150][88] The FDA approved relabeling the reformulated version as abuse-resistant in April 2013.[151]

Pfizer manufactures a preparation of short-acting oxycodone, marketed as Oxecta, which contains inactive ingredients, referred to as tamper-resistant Aversion Technology.[152] Approved by the FDA in the U.S. in June 2011, the new formulation, while not being able to deter oral recreational use, makes crushing, chewing, snorting, or injecting the opioid impractical because of a change in its chemical properties.[153]

[edit]

Oxycodone is subject to international conventions on narcotic drugs. In addition, oxycodone is subject to national laws that differ by country. The 1931 Convention for Limiting the Manufacture and Regulating the Distribution of Narcotic Drugs of the League of Nations included oxycodone.[154] The 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of the United Nations, which replaced the 1931 convention, categorized oxycodone in Schedule I.[155] Global restrictions on Schedule I drugs include "limit[ing] exclusively to medical and scientific purposes the production, manufacture, export, import, distribution of, trade in, use and possession of" these drugs; "requir[ing] medical prescriptions for the supply or dispensation of [these] drugs to individuals"; and "prevent[ing] the accumulation" of quantities of these drugs "in excess of those required for the normal conduct of business".[155]

Australia

[edit]

Oxycodone is in Schedule I (derived from the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs) of the Commonwealth's Narcotic Drugs Act 1967.[156] In addition, it is in Schedule 8 of the Australian Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Drugs and Poisons ("Poisons Standard"), meaning it is a "controlled drug... which should be available for use but require[s] restriction of manufacture, supply, distribution, possession and use to reduce abuse, misuse and physical or psychological dependence".[157]

Canada

[edit]

Oxycodone is a controlled substance under Schedule I of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA).[158]

Canadian oxycodone HCL/acetaminophen 5/325 mg tablet

In February 2012, Ontario passed legislation to allow the expansion of an already existing drug-tracking system for publicly funded drugs to include those that are privately insured. This database will function to identify and monitor patient's attempts to seek prescriptions from multiple doctors or retrieve them from multiple pharmacies. Other provinces have proposed similar legislation, while some, such as Nova Scotia, have legislation already in effect for monitoring prescription drug use. These changes have coincided with other changes in Ontario's legislation to target the misuse of painkillers and high addiction rates to drugs such as oxycodone. As of 29 February 2012, Ontario passed legislation delisting oxycodone from the province's public drug benefit program. This was a first for any province to delist a drug based on addictive properties. The new law prohibits prescriptions for OxyNeo except to certain patients under the Exceptional Access Program including palliative care and in other extenuating circumstances. Patients already prescribed oxycodone will receive coverage for an additional year for OxyNeo, and after that, it will be disallowed unless designated under the exceptional access program.[159]

Much of the legislative activity has stemmed from Purdue Pharma's decision in 2011 to begin a modification of OxyContin's composition to make it more difficult to crush for snorting or injecting. The new formulation, OxyNeo, is intended to be preventive in this regard and retain its effectiveness as a painkiller. Since introducing its Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act, Ontario has committed to focusing on drug addiction, particularly in the monitoring and identification of problem opioid prescriptions, as well as the education of patients, doctors, and pharmacists.[160] This Act, introduced in 2010, commits to the establishment of a unified database to fulfil this intention.[161] Both the public and medical community have received the legislation positively, though concerns about the ramifications of legal changes have been expressed. Because laws are largely provincially regulated, many speculate a national strategy is needed to prevent smuggling across provincial borders from jurisdictions with looser restrictions.[162]

In 2015, Purdue Pharma's abuse-resistant OxyNEO and six generic versions of OxyContin had been on the Canada-wide approved list for prescriptions since 2012. In June 2015, then-federal Minister of Health Rona Ambrose announced that within three years, all oxycodone products sold in Canada would need to be tamper-resistant. Some experts warned that the generic product manufacturers may not have the technology to achieve that goal, possibly giving Purdue Pharma a monopoly on this opiate.[163]

Several class-action suits across Canada have been launched against the Purdue group of companies and affiliates. Claimants argue the pharmaceutical manufacturers did not meet a standard of care and were negligent in doing so. These lawsuits reference earlier judgments in the United States, which held that Purdue was liable for wrongful marketing practices and misbranding. Since 2007, the Purdue companies have paid over CAN$650 million in settling litigation or facing criminal fines.

Germany

[edit]

The drug is in Appendix III of the Narcotics Act (Betäubungsmittelgesetz or BtMG).[164] The law allows only physicians, dentists, and veterinarians to prescribe oxycodone and the federal government to regulate the prescriptions (e.g., by requiring reporting).[164]

Hong Kong

[edit]

Oxycodone is regulated under Part I of Schedule 1 of Hong Kong's Chapter 134 Dangerous Drugs Ordinance.[165]

Japan

[edit]

Oxycodone is a restricted drug in Japan. Its import and export are strictly restricted to specially designated organizations having a prior permit to import it. In a high-profile case an American who was a top Toyota executive living in Tokyo, who claimed to be unaware of the law, was arrested for importing oxycodone into Japan.[166][167]

Singapore

[edit]

Oxycodone is listed as a Class A drug in the Misuse of Drugs Act of Singapore, which means offences concerning the drug attract the most severe level of punishment. A conviction for unauthorized manufacture of the drug attracts a minimum sentence of 10 years of imprisonment and corporal punishment of 5 strokes of the cane, and a maximum sentence of life imprisonment or 30 years of imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.[168] The minimum and maximum penalties for unauthorized trafficking in the drug are respectively 5 years of imprisonment and 5 strokes of the cane, and 20 years of imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.[169]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Oxycodone is a Class A drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.[170] For Class A drugs, which are "considered to be the most likely to cause harm", possession without a prescription is punishable by up to seven years in prison, an unlimited fine, or both.[171] Dealing of the drug illegally is punishable by up to life imprisonment, an unlimited fine, or both.[171] Oxycodone is a Schedule 2 drug under the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 which "provide certain exemptions from the provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971".[172]

United States

[edit]

Under the Controlled Substances Act, oxycodone is a Schedule II controlled substance whether by itself or part of a multi-ingredient medication.[173] The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) lists oxycodone both for sale and for use in manufacturing other opioids as ACSCN 9143 and in 2013 approved the following annual aggregate manufacturing quotas: 131.5 metric tons for sale, down from 153.75 in 2012, and 10.25 metric tons for conversion, unchanged from the previous year.[174] In 2020, oxycodone possession was decriminalized in the U.S. state of Oregon.[175]

Economics

[edit]

The International Narcotics Control Board estimated 11.5 short tons (10.4 t) of oxycodone were manufactured worldwide in 1998;[176] by 2007 this figure had grown to 75.2 short tons (68.2 t).[176] United States accounted for 82% of consumption in 2007 at 51.6 short tons (46.8 t). Canada, Germany, Australia, and France combined accounted for 13% of consumption in 2007.[176][177] In 2010, 1.3 short tons (1.2 t) of oxycodone were illegally manufactured using a fake pill imprint. This accounted for 0.8% of consumption. These illicit tablets were later seized by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, according to the International Narcotics Control Board.[178] The board also reported 122.5 short tons (111.1 t) manufactured in 2010. This number had decreased from a record high of 135.9 short tons (123.3 t) in 2009.[179]

Names

[edit]

Expanded expressions for the compound oxycodone in the academic literature include "dihydrohydroxycodeinone",[1][180][181] "Eucodal",[180][181] "Eukodal",[5][13] "14-hydroxydihydrocodeinone",[1][180] and "Nucodan".[180][181] In a UNESCO convention, the translations of "oxycodone" are oxycodon (Dutch), oxycodone (French), oxicodona (Spanish), الأوكسيكودون‎ (Arabic), 羟考酮 (Chinese), and оксикодон (Russian).[182]

The word "oxycodone" should not be confused with "oxandrolone", "oxazepam", "oxybutynin", "oxytocin", or "Roxanol".[183]

Other brand names include Longtec and Shortec.[184]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Oxycodone is a potent semi-synthetic derived from , an , first synthesized in 1916 and introduced clinically in 1917 for pain relief. It exerts its primary effects through agonism at mu-, kappa-, and delta- receptors in the , mimicking endogenous to suppress pain transmission while also inducing side effects such as , , and respiratory depression via the same mechanism. Although effective for managing moderate to severe acute and unresponsive to non- therapies, oxycodone carries substantial risks of tolerance, , and , with evidence indicating that even short-term therapeutic use can lead to in a subset of patients due to its reward pathway activation. Available in immediate-release formulations for breakthrough pain and extended-release versions like OxyContin for sustained analgesia, oxycodone is metabolized primarily by and enzymes into active metabolites such as , contributing to variable efficacy and toxicity across individuals based on genetic polymorphisms. Its widespread prescription, peaking in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, has been causally linked to surges in opioid-related overdoses and misuse, as epidemiological data show dose-dependent increases in abuse liability exceeding that of weaker opioids like . Despite regulatory efforts to curb non-medical use through scheduling and abuse-deterrent formulations, oxycodone remains a cornerstone of where benefits outweigh risks, underscoring the tension between its therapeutic utility and inherent pharmacological hazards.

Pharmacology

Pharmacodynamics

Oxycodone acts primarily as an at μ-opioid receptors () in the central and peripheral nervous systems, with binding affinities reported in the range of 18–500 nM across studies using cloned human receptors. It exhibits lower affinity for κ-opioid receptors (KOR) and δ-opioid receptors (DOR), approximately 5–10 times weaker than for MOR, contributing to its selective profile favoring analgesia over or hallucinations predominant with KOR activation. Upon binding to , a G-protein-coupled receptor, oxycodone promotes the exchange of GDP for GTP on the Gα subunit of inhibitory Gi/Go proteins, dissociating the G-protein complex and initiating downstream signaling. This inhibits activity, reducing intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels; activates Gβγ-mediated opening of G-protein inward-rectifier potassium (GIRK) channels, causing neuronal hyperpolarization; and suppresses opening, collectively decreasing presynaptic neurotransmitter release including glutamate and in nociceptive pathways. Postsynaptic hyperpolarization further diminishes neuronal excitability in pain-modulating regions such as the dorsal horn of the and matter. These mechanisms underlie analgesia by attenuating ascending pain signals and enhancing descending inhibition, while supraspinal activation in the disinhibits dopaminergic neurons, promoting observed in and self-administration models. Respiratory depression arises from -mediated suppression of neurons, reducing respiratory rhythmicity and CO2 responsiveness, with animal studies showing oxycodone induces dose-dependent in rats at doses of 3–10 mg/kg, slightly more potently than equianalgesic . Gastrointestinal stasis results from peripheral agonism inhibiting enteric cholinergic transmission, confirmed in isolated ileum assays where oxycodone reduces via decreased release. Oxycodone's active , , formed via CYP2D6-mediated O-demethylation, binds with 5–14 times higher affinity and greater efficacy than the parent drug, amplifying and prolonging effects in extensive metabolizers, as evidenced by enhanced antinociception in CYP2D6-transgenic mouse models. Noroxycodone, another , shows minimal activity, with affinity roughly one-third that of oxycodone and negligible contribution to analgesia. receptor coupling assays indicate oxymorphone's superior G-protein activation, underscoring its role in overall pharmacodynamic potency.

Pharmacokinetics

Oxycodone is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with peak plasma concentrations (T_max) typically occurring within 1 to 2 hours for immediate-release formulations. The onset of action for immediate-release formulations is 10-30 minutes, with a duration of 3-6 hours, while extended-release formulations have an onset of approximately 1 hour and a duration of 12 hours. Oral bioavailability ranges from 60% to 87%, varying based on formulation, with immediate-release forms showing higher and more consistent absorption compared to extended-release versions, which exhibit reduced bioavailability due to slower release mechanisms. The drug distributes widely throughout the body, with a of approximately 2 to 3 L/kg following intravenous administration, indicating extensive tissue penetration beyond the plasma compartment. Oxycodone is 38% to 45% bound to plasma proteins, primarily , with minimal binding to alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. Metabolism occurs primarily in the liver via enzymes, with mediating N-demethylation to noroxycodone (an inactive accounting for about 45% to 50% of the dose) and catalyzing 9% to 11% O-demethylation to (a potent ). Genetic polymorphisms in significantly influence formation, with poor metabolizers exhibiting lower conversion rates and reduced exposure, while ultra-rapid metabolizers show enhanced production and potential for toxicity. inhibition or induction further alters overall oxycodone exposure. Elimination half-life averages 3.2 hours for immediate-release oxycodone and 4.5 hours for extended-release formulations, with clearance primarily renal. Approximately 10% of the dose is excreted unchanged in urine, while 72% appears as metabolites, including oxidative and reduced forms. Pharmacokinetic parameters vary with factors such as age, with clearance decreasing in elderly patients due to reduced hepatic function, leading to higher plasma concentrations and prolonged half-life. Liver impairment severely reduces clearance, increasing unchanged oxycodone excretion and accumulation risk. Food intake has minimal impact on immediate-release absorption but can delay T_max and increase bioavailability for certain extended-release formulations.

Therapeutic Applications

Clinical Indications

Oxycodone is indicated for the relief of moderate to severe severe enough to require an opioid analgesic when alternative treatments, including non-opioid analgesics, prove inadequate. This encompasses acute scenarios such as postoperative following major , traumatic injuries involving tissue damage, and in cancer patients with underlying nociceptive mechanisms. Clinical guidelines recommend its use primarily for short-term management in these contexts, reserving it for refractory to initial non-opioid interventions like acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In driven by direct activation of peripheral nociceptors from or , oxycodone demonstrates superior potency compared to weaker opioids such as , enabling effective for rapid symptom control. Systematic reviews of randomized trials confirm its equivalence to in efficacy for such while highlighting the need for etiology-specific assessment to distinguish tissue-based nociception from non-nociceptive or centralized processes, where opioids show diminished causal benefit. Patient selection thus emphasizes verifiable generators, such as verifiable surgical wounds or oncologic lesions, over unsubstantiated chronic complaints lacking objective correlates.

Formulations and Dosing

Oxycodone is available in immediate-release formulations, including oral tablets, capsules, and solutions, typically in strengths ranging from 5 mg to 30 mg of oxycodone per dose, designed for rapid onset to manage acute or breakthrough pain with dosing every 4 to 6 hours as needed. Extended-release formulations, such as abuse-deterrent tablets (e.g., OxyContin), provide strengths from 10 mg to 80 mg, intended for around-the-clock dosing every 12 hours in opioid-tolerant patients with , relying on matrix technology for gradual release to maintain steady plasma levels and minimize peak-trough fluctuations. These pharmacokinetic properties support IR forms for short-duration analgesia via quick absorption and ER forms for sustained mu-opioid receptor without frequent administration. Combination products pair oxycodone with non- analgesics, such as acetaminophen (e.g., 5 mg oxycodone/325 mg acetaminophen tablets) or aspirin (e.g., 4.8355 mg oxycodone/325 mg aspirin), to enhance analgesia through multimodal mechanisms while limiting opioid exposure; however, cumulative intake risks exceeding safe thresholds for adjuncts, like 4 g daily acetaminophen to prevent or gastrointestinal bleeding from aspirin. Dosing adjustments follow principles, with oral oxycodone exhibiting approximately 1:1.5 potency relative to oral for immediate-release forms (1:2 for extended-release), guiding conversions from other opioids by calculating total daily requirements and reducing by 25-50% initially to account for incomplete . proceeds incrementally based on pain response and tolerability, prioritizing lower starting doses to align with variable (60-87%) and (3-4.5 hours for IR). In elderly patients, reduced dosing (e.g., starting at 3-5 mg extended-release every 12 hours) mitigates heightened pharmacodynamic sensitivity and slower clearance, while renal impairment necessitates dose cuts due to accumulation of the oxymorphone, which undergoes renal excretion and can prolong effects leading to .

Evidence of Efficacy

Oxycodone demonstrates superior short-term efficacy in acute postoperative pain compared to , with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 2.4 (95% CI 1.5-4.9) for at least 50% pain following a single 15 mg oral dose in patients with moderate to severe pain.60939-8.pdf) Single doses exceeding 5 mg provide effective in various surgical contexts, outperforming in reducing visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during movement, though combinations with enhance outcomes further. These benefits are primarily measured via subjective VAS reductions, typically 20-30% greater than , but rely on self-reported endpoints that may overestimate efficacy due to placebo response and lack of objective functional metrics. In chronic non-cancer pain, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show oxycodone yields mean pain reductions of approximately 30% on VAS scales compared to for neuropathic and nociceptive types, but evidence for sustained benefits beyond 12 months is limited, with no consistent improvements in physical function or . Systematic reviews from 2014 to 2022 indicate mixed results, with short-term pain score decreases but insufficient data to confirm long-term efficacy or superiority over non-opioids, particularly as tolerance may erode initial gains without corresponding reductions. For cancer-related pain, meta-analyses of RCTs report oxycodone's efficacy as equivalent to , with similar VAS score reductions and responder rates (e.g., ≥30% pain relief in 50-60% of patients), and no broad superiority in titration speed or overall control. Comparative trials, including double-blind crossovers, confirm controlled-release formulations achieve comparable steady-state analgesia, though individual responses vary without predictable advantages in profiles influencing efficacy. These findings underscore oxycodone's role as a viable alternative but highlight reliance on subjective metrics over objective tumor progression or survival correlates.

Risk Assessment

Common Adverse Effects

Oxycodone commonly produces gastrointestinal adverse effects, including in approximately 23% of adult patients and in 23%, as observed in clinical trials for controlled-release formulations. These arise from mu-opioid receptor agonism, which reduces gastrointestinal motility and secretion. Central nervous system effects such as (23%) and (13%) occur frequently, alongside pruritus (13%) and (12%). Prolonged administration can disrupt endocrine function, with reported in roughly 63% of males on chronic therapy, including oxycodone, due to suppression of . Respiratory depression, a dose-dependent effect, manifests more prominently in opioid-naive individuals than in tolerant patients, where partial tolerance may mitigate severity at equivalent doses. Incidence of these effects varies by population, with higher rates generally in treatment-naive users.

Dependence, Tolerance, and Withdrawal

Oxycodone induces tolerance primarily through desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor (), involving by kinases such as G-protein receptor kinases (GRKs), leading to receptor uncoupling from G-proteins and diminished signaling efficacy upon repeated exposure. This process reduces the drug's effects, necessitating higher doses for equivalent pain relief, while chronic activation also upregulates activity, elevating cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels and further contributing to cellular adaptations that oppose opioid-mediated inhibition. Physical dependence develops as a neuroadaptive response to sustained , characterized by homeostatic changes that manifest as withdrawal upon discontinuation, but it differs from , which entails loss of control over use and driven by reward circuitry alterations. Withdrawal symptoms from oxycodone, an intermediate-duration , typically onset 6-12 hours after the last dose, peak at 1-3 days, and include anxiety, , , piloerection, , and flu-like due to rebound hyperactivity in noradrenergic and systems. Tapering regimens, reducing doses by 10-25% weekly, effectively manage these symptoms by allowing gradual reversal of adaptations. Cohort studies indicate that 8-12% of -naïve surgical patients progress to new persistent opioid use beyond 90 days postoperatively, reflecting dependence risk in acute settings influenced by dosing duration and severity. Genetic factors, including OPRM1 like rs1799971 (A118G), modulate dependence susceptibility by altering receptor expression and affinity, with the G allele linked to heightened risk in empirical associations.

Overdose Mechanisms and Management

Oxycodone overdose primarily arises from excessive at mu-opioid receptors, resulting in profound and respiratory depression. The hallmark clinical triad consists of pinpoint pupils (), respiratory or severe , and or profound sedation, driven by suppression of brainstem respiratory centers and reduced responsiveness to . This mu-receptor mediated toxicity inhibits the drive to breathe, leading to hypoxia, , and , which collectively cause cardiovascular collapse and death if untreated. In non-tolerant individuals, oral doses exceeding 200 mg can precipitate life-threatening effects, with fatalities reported in the range of 200-500 mg depending on factors such as body weight, co-ingestants, and individual variability in metabolism. Management prioritizes airway protection and ventilatory support, including bag-valve-mask ventilation or to reverse hypoxia before or alongside pharmacologic reversal. , a competitive mu-opioid , is the cornerstone , administered intravenously in initial boluses of 0.4-2 mg titrated to respiratory and mental status improvement, with repeat doses every 2-3 minutes as needed. For extended-release formulations like OxyContin, prolonged infusion (e.g., two-thirds of the initial effective bolus dose per hour) is often required due to delayed absorption and risk of recurrent respiratory depression (renarcotization) hours post-administration. Monitoring in an intensive care setting is essential, with adjunctive measures such as activated charcoal for recent ingestions and lipid emulsion therapy considered in refractory cases, though evidence for the latter remains limited to case reports. Prior to the mid-2010s surge in synthetic opioids like , oxycodone contributed to approximately 15% of U.S. -involved overdose deaths, particularly during the prescription wave peaking around 2010-2012, as documented in CDC vital statistics. Post-2020, oxycodone-related fatalities have declined relative to total deaths, overshadowed by the dominance of illicit and its analogs, which now account for over 70% of overdoses amid a broader synthetic epidemic. This shift reflects changing drug supply dynamics rather than reduced oxycodone potency or use, with prescription deaths stabilizing or decreasing as -laced products proliferate.

Drug Interactions

Pharmacokinetic Interactions

Oxycodone is metabolized primarily by hepatic enzymes, with responsible for the majority of N-demethylation to noroxycodone (approximately sevenfold greater contribution than ) and mediating O-demethylation to the oxymorphone, though the latter pathway accounts for a minor fraction of overall clearance. Strong inhibitors, such as , substantially increase oxycodone exposure; in a randomized crossover study involving healthy volunteers pretreated with (200 mg twice daily for 4 days), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for oral oxycodone (0.1 mg/kg) rose by 1.8-fold compared to , accompanied by enhanced pharmacodynamic effects like . Similar elevations (2- to 3-fold AUC increase) have been reported, underscoring the potential for heightened effects and toxicity when coadministered. In contrast, inducers like rifampin markedly decrease oxycodone ; pretreatment with rifampin (600 mg daily for 7 days) reduced the AUC of oral oxycodone by 86% (to 14% of control) in healthy subjects, while intravenous AUC fell by 53%, likely compromising efficacy due to accelerated metabolism and clearance. polymorphisms influence metabolite formation but have limited impact on parent oxycodone pharmacokinetics, given dominance; poor metabolizers (PMs), comprising 5-10% of Caucasians due to inactive alleles like *4, show diminished production (up to several-fold reduction) without significant changes in oxycodone AUC, though combined / inhibition can amplify exposure threefold. Drug-drug interaction trials, including those simulating enzyme inhibition, affirm the clinical relevance of these CYP-mediated alterations, with effects predominating over in determining systemic oxycodone levels and variability.

Clinical Considerations

Oxycodone use requires careful evaluation of patient-specific factors that may amplify interaction risks, particularly in those with compromised respiratory function or gastrointestinal motility. It is contraindicated in patients with acute or severe bronchial without monitoring or resuscitative equipment, as co-administration with other depressants—such as benzodiazepines or alcohol—can potentiate respiratory depression leading to or apnea. Similarly, oxycodone is contraindicated in cases of known or suspected paralytic or other gastrointestinal obstructions, where interactions with agents or other opioids may exacerbate , increasing the risk of bowel or . Severe respiratory depression, a baseline risk of oxycodone, is further heightened in patients concurrently using inhibitors, necessitating dose adjustments or avoidance to prevent life-threatening outcomes. Concomitant administration with serotonergic medications, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), carries a rare but documented risk of serotonin syndrome, characterized by symptoms such as hyperthermia, rigidity, myoclonus, and autonomic instability; opioids like oxycodone contribute weakly to serotonin release but may synergize with strong serotonergics. Clinical monitoring for early signs is recommended, especially in polypharmacy scenarios, though isolated opioid-SSRI combinations rarely precipitate severe cases without additional factors. Case reports illustrate adverse outcomes, including one instance of serotonin syndrome following oxycodone initiation in a patient on citalopram and other agents, resolved only after discontinuation. In elderly patients, heightens vulnerability to oxycodone interactions due to reduced hepatic and renal clearance, increasing , falls, and fractures; the American Geriatrics Society advise caution with opioids, favoring non-pharmacologic alternatives or lowest effective doses amid multiple comedications like antihypertensives or sedatives that compound orthostasis and . Verifiable case series report exacerbated respiratory depression and in older adults ignoring these warnings, such as when oxycodone combines with benzodiazepines, underscoring the need for comprehensive and periodic reassessment. Guidelines emphasize starting at reduced doses (e.g., 25-50% lower) in this population to mitigate cumulative risks.

Historical Development

Synthesis and Early Research

Oxycodone, a semisynthetic , was first synthesized in 1916 by chemists Martin Freund and Edmund at the University of Frankfurt in through chemical modification of , an extracted from poppies. This derivation process involved oxidation and rearrangement of thebaine's structure to yield 14-hydroxy-7,8-dihydrocodeinone, distinguishing oxycodone from naturally occurring like while retaining mu-opioid receptor agonism central to its pharmacological effects. Merck KGaA commercialized oxycodone shortly thereafter, introducing it to the German market in 1917 under the Eukodal for severe , particularly during wartime medical needs. Early production emphasized its potential as a potent alternative to , leveraging thebaine's relative abundance compared to or precursors, though yields were initially low due to inefficient synthesis routes. Preclinical and early clinical investigations in the through , primarily in , focused on efficacy via animal models such as tail-flick tests in and limited human trials for postoperative or , establishing oxycodone's oral potency at approximately 1.5 times that of on an equipotent basis. These studies, conducted without contemporary regulatory oversight like FDA requirements, prioritized pain relief outcomes over long-term safety profiling, with scant attention to dependence risks amid the era's acceptance of opioids for routine analgesia. data remained anecdotal and small-scale, often involving injectable or oral forms, confirming rapid onset and efficacy but noting variability in absorption absent modern pharmacokinetic standardization.

Commercial Introduction and Patents

Oxycodone was first commercially introduced in the United States as an immediate-release in 1939, marketed under brand names such as Eukodal in prior to U.S. entry. In , following its synthesis in in 1916, oxycodone saw medical use as early as 1917, with commercial availability in under less stringent initial regulatory frameworks compared to later U.S. controls. The U.S. (FDA) approved extended-release oxycodone, branded as OxyContin by , on December 12, 1995, for management of moderate-to-severe pain requiring around-the-clock dosing. This entered the market in 1996, initially in 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg strengths. Purdue Pharma held key s on the original OxyContin formulation, which began expiring in phases from 2004, allowing FDA approval of generic controlled-release oxycodone products that year and subsequent market entry, significantly increasing supply availability. Further protections extended into 2010-2012, after which additional generics proliferated, correlating with a surge in overall oxycodone distribution volumes. In response to rising via crushing and snorting, Purdue reformulated OxyContin in 2010 with abuse-deterrent properties, including a hardened oxide matrix approved by the FDA in April of that year, which aimed to resist tampering while maintaining therapeutic . This reformulation extended exclusivity to 2030 for the new version. Studies on the 2010 reformulation's impact indicate reductions in OxyContin-specific abuse rates, with post-marketing surveillance showing declines in misuse via injection and by 50-75% in some cohorts, though overall abuse patterns shifted toward alternative products without net decreases in total opioid-related harms. Global commercialization followed regional regulatory paths, with extended-release forms introduced later in during the 2000s under varying schedules, reflecting divergent approaches to access compared to the U.S. Schedule II classification.

Regulatory Framework

Controlled Substance Classification

Oxycodone is classified as a Schedule II under the (CSA) of 1970, which categorizes substances based on their potential for abuse, accepted medical use, and safety profile. Schedule II placement reflects oxycodone's high abuse potential, with evidence of severe psychological or upon misuse, yet it retains currently accepted medical applications for managing moderate to severe unresponsive to non-opioid therapies. Unlike Schedule I substances lacking medical utility, oxycodone's scheduling permits limited prescriptions—typically non-refillable and requiring a written order—while imposing strict record-keeping and security requirements on handlers to mitigate diversion risks. The (DEA) enforces this classification through annual aggregate production quotas (APQs) for Schedule II opioids, including oxycodone, to ensure supply meets legitimate demand without excess enabling illicit markets. Quotas are determined using metrics, such as converting oxycodone doses to milligram equivalents (MME), where 1 mg oxycodone equates to approximately 1.5 mg , standardizing assessments across agents for potency and overdose risk. Following heightened scrutiny post-2010 amid escalating opioid-related harms, DEA reforms included quota reductions; for example, the 2020 APQ for oxycodone was proposed at 9% below 2019 levels, part of broader cuts totaling over 50% for certain opioids since peak production around 2013. These adjustments prioritize empirical data on diversion rates and medical utilization over manufacturer requests, aiming to curb oversupply without compromising access. Scheduling criteria draw from (NIDA) evaluations of dependence liability, which demonstrate oxycodone's strong reinforcing effects via mu-opioid receptor agonism, fostering rapid tolerance, compulsive use, and withdrawal syndromes comparable to in dependent populations. Human laboratory studies confirm its abuse potential exceeds that of some non-opioid but aligns with other semi-synthetic opioids, supporting Schedule II over less restrictive categories. Additionally, oxycodone's narrow —defined by the ratio of toxic (e.g., respiratory-depressant) to effective doses—underpins the rationale, as small escalations in intake can precipitate life-threatening apnea, evidenced by pharmacological data showing minimal separation between and lethality thresholds in vulnerable individuals. Internationally, oxycodone aligns with analogous controls under the 1961 , emphasizing similar balances of abuse risk and therapeutic value without endorsing laxer regimes.

Global Variations and Reforms

In , oxycodone is classified as a Schedule 8 controlled drug, subject to stringent oversight including limits on quantity and repeat prescriptions. National implementation of real-time prescription monitoring (RTPM) in 2019, building on state-level systems like Victoria's SafeScript, correlated with a sharp decline in use; wastewater analysis indicated a 45% reduction in oxycodone consumption from 2019 to 2020, while research reported near-halving of overall use following packaging reforms and prescribing restrictions that year. These measures aimed to curb diversion and overuse without prohibiting legitimate access for severe pain. Japan maintains highly restrictive controls on oxycodone under the Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act, requiring prescriptions only from physicians specially licensed for and limiting imports to certified quantities with advance approval. Such regulations contribute to low consumption and minimal reported misuse, prioritizing prevention over broad availability. Similarly, classifies oxycodone as a Schedule 2 substance under the Misuse of Drugs Act, enforcing severe penalties for unauthorized possession or distribution, which has resulted in negligible non-medical use rates compared to higher-access jurisdictions. Canada experienced a surge in oxycodone prescribing through the early 2010s amid expanded access for , but subsequent reforms—including tamper-resistant formulations introduced around 2012 and federal post-market oversight enhancements in 2018—led to declining dispensing rates, with high-dose prescriptions plateauing and then falling by over 20% in some periods. In contrast, the (EMA) guidelines emphasize risk mitigation strategies for s like oxycodone, such as mandatory patient monitoring, dose limits, and on dependence risks, rather than prohibitive bans, to balance analgesia with across member states. Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), adopted variably worldwide including Australia's RTPM and equivalents in and EU nations, have demonstrated effectiveness in curbing "" by enabling prescribers to review patient histories in real time, with studies showing reductions in multiple-provider fills by up to 78% in implemented regions. These reforms highlight jurisdiction-specific trade-offs: stricter regimes in yield lower misuse prevalence, while graduated monitoring in Western contexts has empirically decreased diversion without fully eliminating access for medical needs.

Societal Impact

Role in Opioid Overuse Patterns

U.S. prescriptions for , with oxycodone comprising a substantial share as one of the most dispensed agents, reached a peak of 259 million in 2012 before declining to approximately 125 million by 2023. This reduction reflects broader trends in curtailed dispensing following heightened regulatory scrutiny and guidelines. Prior to 2015, prescription opioids including oxycodone were implicated in about 37% of deaths, remaining stable from 2012 levels, though specific oxycodone involvement varied by region—such as 36.5% of prescription fatalities in analyses. Diversion of oxycodone from legitimate supply channels has been estimated by the DEA at less than 1% of total production. The street term "M30" refers to 30 mg oxycodone tablets, with authentic versions manufactured by Mallinckrodt being blue, round pills imprinted with an "M" (often boxed) on one side and "30" on the other. However, in illicit markets, many "M30" pills are counterfeits containing fentanyl, contributing to heightened overdose risks. Overdose patterns have shifted markedly since the mid-2010s, with synthetic opioids like dominating, accounting for 69% of all deaths in 2023 despite the parallel drop in prescription volumes. Misuse demographics indicate elevated risks among sufferers exhibiting comorbid issues, including depression and anxiety, which correlate with higher prevalence.

Causal Analyses and Debunked Narratives

The opioid overuse crisis involving oxycodone reflects multi-system regulatory failures rather than isolated pharmaceutical actions, with lapses in oversight enabling widespread overprescribing in the 1990s. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved extended-release oxycodone formulations, such as OxyContin in December 1995, amid guidelines that underestimated addiction risks by emphasizing undertreatment of pain and citing low addiction rates in clinical settings—often drawing from a single 1980 letter claiming addiction in less than 1% of patients. These approvals coincided with policy incentives, including the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' 2001 pain management standards treating pain as the "fifth vital sign," which pressured providers to escalate opioid prescriptions without adequate safeguards against dependency. A 2022 analysis framed the crisis as a regulatory breakdown across agencies, including insufficient post-market surveillance and failure to enforce distribution controls, amplifying iatrogenic harm from legitimate medical use. Individual vulnerabilities, including genetic and psychological factors, interact with these policy-driven exposures to heighten risk, underscoring that oxycodone's role cannot be divorced from predispositions. Twin and studies estimate of addiction liability at 40-60%, with shared genetic markers across substances influencing susceptibility to independently of specific drugs like oxycodone. Psychological elements, such as prior trauma or conditions, compound this, particularly when aggressive treatment protocols initiate use in at-risk populations, leading to iatrogenic contributions where medical initiation escalates to dependency. Narratives portraying OxyContin as uniquely addictive have been overstated, as empirical data indicate comparable potential to other opioids, with the drug's extended-release mechanism not inherently conferring lower but rather enabling higher-dose tampering until reformulation. Claims of exceptional addictiveness often stem from Purdue Pharma's misleading labeling downplaying , yet this paled against broader shifts to illicit and , which drove overdose escalation post-2010 despite declining prescriptions. Lax enforcement of diversion controls and border security further dwarfed labeling issues, as synthetic opioids flooded markets unresponsive to domestic prescribing patterns. From a causal standpoint, unmet for relief—fueled by chronic conditions and emphasis on access—outweighs supply-push theories, evidenced by state prescribing caps that curtailed legitimate use without reducing illicit consumption or overdoses. Studies of cap laws show no association with lowered overdose rates, instead correlating with barriers to care for patients, while overdose drivers shifted to non-pharmaceutical synthetics. This supports viewing overuse as rooted in incentive misalignments, such as regulatory underemphasis on vulnerability screening over volume targets, rather than pharma-centric blame that ignores empirical shifts in supply sources.

Public Health Interventions and Outcomes

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued opioid prescribing guidelines in 2016, recommending non- therapies as first-line for and limiting initial opioid prescriptions to three days or less for acute , which correlated with substantial declines in opioid dispensing rates nationwide. Subsequent updates in 2022 emphasized individualized dosing and expanded focus on acute while reinforcing risks of long-term use, contributing to further reductions estimated at 30-50% from peak levels around 2012, though exact attribution varies by state and drug type. Monitoring Programs (PDMPs), mandated in all states by 2017, require clinicians to check patient histories before prescribing controlled substances; mandatory-use PDMPs have been associated with decreases in natural deaths by up to 518 per 100,000 population in some analyses, alongside reduced prescribing volumes. However, evidence on PDMPs' overall impact on total opioid overdoses remains mixed, with some studies showing no net reduction or offsets from shifts to non-monitored substances. Harm reduction efforts, including widespread distribution through community programs and emergency departments, have demonstrated effectiveness in reversing overdoses and lowering mortality; observational data indicate 10-20% reductions in opioid-related deaths in high-distribution areas, with cost-effectiveness models projecting up to 9% annual decreases from expanded access. Expansion of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) using , , and has similarly reduced overdose risks, with studies estimating 16.9% lower mortality among treated patients and substantial drops in all-cause deaths for those receiving these therapies. Despite these prescription declines—driven by guidelines and PDMPs—overall U.S. overdose deaths continued rising post-2016, primarily from illicit contamination rather than prescription opioids, which saw a nearly 12% drop in involvement. These interventions have introduced trade-offs, including barriers to legitimate ; in populations, where prevalence exceeds 50%, abrupt prescribing restrictions have raised concerns about undertreated pain exacerbating risks, including , as higher opioid doses were previously linked to elevated suicide attempts but withdrawal of access correlates with persistent suffering in non-cancer pain cohorts. Internationally, Australia's 2019 regulatory changes—rescheduling immediate-release oxycodone to require specialist approval and limiting quantities—halved oxycodone dispensing volumes by 2021 without evidence of worsened population-level pain outcomes, as non- alternatives and monitoring sustained access for acute needs. These reforms highlight potential for supply-side controls to curb misuse while preserving therapeutic utility, though long-term data on pain-specific metrics remain limited.

Economic Factors and Industry Role

OxyContin, Purdue Pharma's branded extended-release oxycodone formulation, generated peak annual revenues of approximately $2.3 billion in 2010, reflecting aggressive physician-targeted that emphasized its efficacy for . Prior to reformulation efforts, such sales underscored the financial incentives within the to expand prescribing volumes through detailing visits, speaker programs, and payments to high-volume prescribers, which studies link to increased opioid prescriptions per physician. These strategies, including rebates and formulary incentives via pharmacy benefit managers, prioritized over stringent risk mitigation, contributing to oxycodone's dominance in the U.S. sector before generic erosion. Generic oxycodone now comprises over 90% of the market by prescription volume, as expirations and from manufacturers like Mallinckrodt have commoditized the drug, reducing branded OxyContin's share to under 10%. This shift has lowered costs significantly, with generics offering economic advantages for severe pain treatment; analyses indicate opioids like oxycodone provide favorable cost-utility ratios compared to alternatives such as fentanyl or frequent non-opioid regimens, due to lower per-dose pricing and outpatient applicability. In response to concerns, industry invested in abuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs), with Purdue developing a crush-resistant OxyContin in 2010 to curb non-oral misuse, though empirical data shows only partial reductions in rates without eliminating diversion incentives. Post-2017 (DEA) aggregate production quotas slashed oxycodone manufacturing limits by over 25%, aiming to curb diversion but resulting in supply shortages that disproportionately affect legitimate medical access, particularly in rural areas with limited options and higher prevalence. These quotas, reduced further in subsequent years (e.g., 9% for oxycodone in 2020 proposals), have exacerbated under-supply dynamics, forcing patients into untreated pain or costlier alternatives and highlighting tensions between overdose prevention and equitable pain relief. Empirical critiques note that while over-prescribing fueled misuse, quota-driven ignores demand from non-diverted medical use, potentially increasing black-market premiums without addressing root causal factors like untreated .

Contemporary Developments

In the United States, overall dispensing rates, which include oxycodone, declined steadily post-2020, continuing a broader trend from a peak of 81.3 prescriptions per 100 persons in 2012 to approximately 51.4 per 100 by 2021, representing a roughly 37% reduction by that point with further decreases thereafter. Specific state variations persist, with maintaining among the lowest rates below 27 prescriptions per 100 persons in 2023-2024 data. Approximately 125 million prescriptions, encompassing oxycodone, were dispensed nationwide in 2023. A key risk in recent prescribing involves postoperative protocols, where a 2025 analysis in the Annals of Surgery of opioid-naïve patients undergoing surgery found that each additional 10 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone increased the odds of new persistent use by 6% (adjusted 1.06, 95% CI 1.06-1.07). This dose-response relationship highlights the need for tailored, minimal initial prescriptions to curb transition to chronic use following procedures. In , oxycodone consumption dropped by 45% between 2019 and 2020, nearly halving overall use, following the implementation of national prescribing guidelines in 2019 and tamper-resistant packaging reforms in 2020, as evidenced by wastewater analysis and research. Globally, the Office on Drugs and Crime's World Drug Report 2025 notes persistent supply constraints on traditional s like oxycodone amid a shift toward unregulated synthetic s, including the rapid emergence of highly potent nitazenes, which now comprise nearly half of newly reported substances and complicate prescription patterns in affected markets.

Ongoing Litigation and Settlements

In June 2025, and the reached a $7.4 billion settlement resolving multidistrict litigation brought by all 55 U.S. states and territories over the company's role in the opioid crisis, with the Sacklers contributing $1.5 billion and Purdue an initial $900 million payment slated for early 2026. This agreement followed Purdue's 2019 bankruptcy filing and multiple prior failed restructuring attempts, building on earlier payouts exceeding $8 billion from the company and family members to state and local governments since 2021. The funds are designated primarily for opioid abatement programs, including addiction treatment and prevention, though critics argue the structure shields the Sacklers from and full civil liability, allowing them to retain billions in assets transferred offshore prior to litigation. Central to suits against Purdue were allegations of deceptive marketing claiming OxyContin's extended-release formulation rendered it less prone to abuse and addiction compared to immediate-release opioids, despite internal company data showing rapid misuse potential through crushing and snorting. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved OxyContin's initial labeling in 1995, which included efficacy claims Purdue later amplified in sales training materials, contributing to perceptions of regulatory endorsement even as post-approval evidence of diversion emerged. A 2007 federal plea deal saw Purdue admit to misbranding by misleading regulators and physicians on addiction risks, resulting in a $600 million fine and executive probation, but enforcement gaps persisted, with the FDA not mandating stronger warnings until 2013 amid rising overdose data. Parallel litigation targeted major distributors—McKesson, , and AmerisourceBergen (now )—for failing to monitor and report suspicious orders from pharmacies, leading to a 2022 national settlement totaling approximately $21 billion over 18 years, with additional state-specific resolutions pushing combined distributor payouts beyond $26 billion by 2025. These agreements impose injunctive reforms, such as data-driven order thresholds and enhanced , addressing causal breakdowns in supply-chain oversight rather than inherent pharmacological risks of oxycodone itself, which empirical studies affirm as effective for severe when prescribed judiciously. Outcomes have funded remediation but drawn scrutiny for relying on third-party payers like governments and insurers, diluting direct accountability and incentivizing over-reliance on litigation over proactive regulatory enforcement. As of October 2025, residual claims against generic oxycodone manufacturers persist in select jurisdictions, with settlements like Washington's $122 million from nine firms in June 2025 emphasizing similar distribution lapses.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.