Hubbry Logo
AutotrophAutotrophMain
Open search
Autotroph
Community hub
Autotroph
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Autotroph
Autotroph
Autotroph
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Overview of cycle between autotrophs and heterotrophs. Photosynthesis is the main means by which plants, algae and many bacteria produce organic compounds and oxygen from carbon dioxide and water (green arrow).

An autotroph is an organism that can convert abiotic sources of energy into energy stored in organic compounds, which can be used by other organisms. Autotrophs produce complex organic compounds (such as carbohydrates, fats, and proteins) using carbon from simple substances such as carbon dioxide,[1] generally using energy from light or inorganic chemical reactions.[2] Autotrophs do not need a living source of carbon or energy and are the producers in a food chain, such as plants on land or algae in water. Autotrophs can reduce carbon dioxide to make organic compounds for biosynthesis and as stored chemical fuel. Most autotrophs use water as the reducing agent, but some can use other hydrogen compounds such as hydrogen sulfide.

The primary producers can convert the energy in the light (phototroph and photoautotroph) or the energy in inorganic chemical compounds (chemotrophs or chemolithotrophs) to build organic molecules, which is usually accumulated in the form of biomass and will be used as carbon and energy source by other organisms (e.g. heterotrophs and mixotrophs). The photoautotrophs are the main primary producers, converting the energy of the light into chemical energy through photosynthesis, ultimately building organic molecules from carbon dioxide, an inorganic carbon source.[3] Examples of chemolithotrophs are some archaea and bacteria (unicellular organisms) that produce biomass from the oxidation of inorganic chemical compounds; these organisms are called chemoautotrophs, and are frequently found in hydrothermal vents in the deep ocean. Primary producers are at the lowest trophic level, and are the reasons why Earth sustains life to this day.[4]

Autotrophs use a portion of the ATP produced during photosynthesis or the oxidation of chemical compounds to reduce NADP+ to NADPH to form organic compounds.[5] Most chemoautotrophs are lithotrophs, using inorganic electron donors such as hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen gas, elemental sulfur, ammonium and ferrous oxide as reducing agents and hydrogen sources for biosynthesis and chemical energy release. Chemolithoautotrophs are microorganisms that synthesize energy through the oxidation of inorganic compounds.[6] They can sustain themselves entirely on atmospheric CO2 and inorganic chemicals without the need for light or organic compounds. They enzymatically catalyze redox reactions using mineral substrates to generate ATP energy.[7] These substrates primarily include hydrogen, iron, nitrogen, and sulfur. Its ecological niche is often specialized to extreme environments, including deep marine hydrothermal vents, stratified sediment, and acidic hot springs.[8]

History

[edit]

The term autotroph was coined by the German botanist Albert Bernhard Frank in 1892.[9][10] It stems from the ancient Greek word τροφή (trophḗ), meaning "nourishment" or "food". The first autotrophic organisms likely evolved early in the Archean but proliferated across Earth's Great Oxidation Event with an increase to the rate of oxygenic photosynthesis by cyanobacteria.[11] Photoautotrophs evolved from heterotrophic bacteria by developing photosynthesis. The earliest photosynthetic bacteria used hydrogen sulphide. Due to the scarcity of hydrogen sulphide, some photosynthetic bacteria evolved to use water in photosynthesis, leading to cyanobacteria.[12]

Variants

[edit]

Some organisms rely on organic compounds as a source of carbon, but are able to use light or inorganic compounds as a source of energy. Such organisms are mixotrophs. An organism that obtains carbon from organic compounds but obtains energy from light is called a photoheterotroph, while an organism that obtains carbon from organic compounds and energy from the oxidation of inorganic compounds is termed a chemolithoheterotroph.

Evidence suggests that some fungi may also obtain energy from ionizing radiation: Such radiotrophic fungi were found growing inside a reactor of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.[13]

Flowchart to determine if a species is autotroph, heterotroph, or a subtype

Examples

[edit]

There are many different types of autotrophs in Earth's ecosystems. Lichens located in tundra climates are an exceptional example of a primary producer that, by mutualistic symbiosis, combines photosynthesis by algae (or additionally nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria) with the protection of a decomposer fungus. As there are many examples of primary producers, two dominant types are coral and one of the many types of brown algae, kelp.[3]

Photosynthesis

[edit]

Gross primary production occurs by photosynthesis. This is the main way that primary producers get energy and make it available to other forms of life. Plants, many corals (by means of intracellular algae), some bacteria (cyanobacteria), and algae do this. During photosynthesis, primary producers receive energy from the sun and use it to produce sugar and oxygen.

Ecology

[edit]
Green fronds of a maidenhair fern, a photoautotroph
See also: Primary production

Without primary producers, organisms that are capable of producing energy on their own, the biological systems of Earth would be unable to sustain themselves.[3] Plants, along with other primary producers, produce the energy that other living beings consume, and the oxygen that they breathe.[3] It is thought that the first organisms on Earth were primary producers located on the ocean floor.[3]

Autotrophs are fundamental to the food chains of all ecosystems in the world. They take energy from the environment in the form of sunlight or inorganic chemicals and use it to create fuel molecules such as carbohydrates. This mechanism is called primary production. Other organisms, called heterotrophs, take in autotrophs as food to carry out functions necessary for their life. Thus, heterotrophs – all animals, almost all fungi, as well as most bacteria and protozoa – depend on autotrophs, or primary producers, for the raw materials and fuel they need. Heterotrophs obtain energy by breaking down carbohydrates or oxidizing organic molecules (carbohydrates, fats, and proteins) obtained in food. Carnivorous organisms rely on autotrophs indirectly, as the nutrients obtained from their heterotrophic prey come from autotrophs they have consumed.

Most ecosystems are supported by the autotrophic primary production of plants and cyanobacteria that capture photons initially released by the sun. Plants can only use a fraction (approximately 1%) of this energy for photosynthesis.[14] The process of photosynthesis splits a water molecule (H2O), releasing oxygen (O2) into the atmosphere, and reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) to release the hydrogen atoms that fuel the metabolic process of primary production. Plants convert and store the energy of the photons into the chemical bonds of simple sugars during photosynthesis. These plant sugars are polymerized for storage as long-chain carbohydrates, such as starch and cellulose; glucose is also used to make fats and proteins. When autotrophs are eaten by heterotrophs, i.e., consumers such as animals, the carbohydrates, fats, and proteins contained in them become energy sources for the heterotrophs.[15] Proteins can be made using nitrates, sulfates, and phosphates in the soil.[16][17]

Primary production in tropical streams and rivers

[edit]

Aquatic algae are a significant contributor to food webs in tropical rivers and streams. This is displayed by net primary production, a fundamental ecological process that reflects the amount of carbon that is synthesized within an ecosystem. This carbon ultimately becomes available to consumers. Net primary production displays that the rates of in-stream primary production in tropical regions are at least an order of magnitude greater than in similar temperate systems.[18]

Origin of autotrophs

[edit]
Main article: Abiogenesis § Deep sea hydrothermal vents

Researchers believe that the first cellular lifeforms were not heterotrophs as they would rely upon autotrophs since organic substrates delivered from space were either too heterogeneous to support microbial growth or too reduced to be fermented. Instead, they consider that the first cells were autotrophs.[19] These autotrophs might have been thermophilic and anaerobic chemolithoautotrophs that lived at deep sea alkaline hydrothermal vents. This view is supported by phylogenetic evidence – the physiology and habitat of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) is inferred to have also been a thermophilic anaerobe with a Wood-Ljungdahl pathway, its biochemistry was replete with FeS clusters and radical reaction mechanisms. It was dependent upon Fe, H2, and CO2.[19][20] The high concentration of K+ present within the cytosol of most life forms suggests that early cellular life had Na+/H+ antiporters or possibly symporters.[21] Autotrophs possibly evolved into heterotrophs when they were at low H2 partial pressures where the first form of heterotrophy were likely amino acid and clostridial type purine fermentations.[22] It has been suggested that photosynthesis emerged in the presence of faint near infrared light emitted by hydrothermal vents. The first photochemically active pigments are then thought to be Zn-tetrapyrroles.[23]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Autotroph

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An is an capable of synthesizing its own food molecules from inorganic substances, such as and , by harnessing energy from external sources like or chemical reactions. These self-sustaining organisms form the foundational producers in ecosystems, converting non-living into organic compounds that support all other life forms. Autotrophs are broadly classified into two main types based on their energy sources: photoautotrophs and chemoautotrophs. Photoautotrophs, including most plants, , and , utilize light energy through to produce glucose and oxygen from and . In contrast, chemoautotrophs, primarily certain and , derive energy from oxidizing inorganic chemicals like or iron, enabling them to thrive in environments without light, such as deep-sea hydrothermal vents. As the primary entry point for into food webs, autotrophs underpin global biogeochemical cycles and , with oceanic contributing approximately 50% of global and terrestrial photoautotrophs the remainder, together accounting for nearly all of Earth's production. Their efficiency in fixing carbon and generating is essential for sustaining heterotrophic consumers, from herbivores to decomposers, and disruptions to autotrophic communities can cascade through entire ecosystems.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

An autotroph is an capable of synthesizing complex organic compounds, such as carbohydrates, from simple inorganic substances like (CO₂) and (H₂O), by harnessing external energy sources. This self-sustaining process allows autotrophs to produce their own food without relying on other organisms for organic nutrients. The term "autotroph" derives from the Greek words "auto," meaning "self," and "trophē," meaning "nourishment" or "feeding," and was coined by German botanist Albert Bernhard Frank in 1892. In contrast, heterotrophs are organisms that cannot synthesize their own organic compounds and must obtain pre-formed by consuming other organisms or their remains, positioning autotrophs as primary producers at the base of most food webs. Autotrophs meet their energy needs by converting external —such as or chemical sources—into through anabolic processes that build macromolecules from simpler precursors. These organisms are broadly classified into photoautotrophs, which use , and chemoautotrophs, which oxidize inorganic chemicals for .

Key Characteristics

Autotrophs possess specialized physiological structures that enable efficient carbon fixation from inorganic sources. In eukaryotic autotrophs, such as plants and algae, chloroplasts serve as the primary organelles for this process, housing the enzyme ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO), which catalyzes the incorporation of CO₂ into organic molecules. In contrast, prokaryotic autotrophs, including cyanobacteria and some chemoautotrophic bacteria, often utilize carboxysomes—proteinaceous microcompartments that encapsulate RuBisCO and carbonic anhydrase to concentrate CO₂ and enhance fixation efficiency in low-CO₂ environments. These structures represent key adaptations that distinguish autotrophs from heterotrophs, allowing self-sustained biosynthesis without reliance on pre-formed organic compounds. At the biochemical level, the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle represents a primary carbon fixation pathway in many autotrophs, where RuBisCO initiates the assimilation of CO₂ into ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, producing 3-phosphoglycerate as an intermediate, though other autotrophs employ alternative pathways. This process is powered by high-energy molecules, primarily ATP and NADPH, which provide the necessary reducing power and phosphorylation energy to regenerate ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate and synthesize carbohydrates like glucose. These energy carriers are generated either through light-driven electron transport in photoautotrophs or oxidation of inorganic compounds in chemoautotrophs, underscoring the pathway's versatility in coupling energy acquisition to carbon assimilation. Autotrophs demonstrate remarkable environmental adaptability, inhabiting a wide range of conditions from illuminated surface waters to deep-sea sediments and anaerobic soils, where they fix CO₂ without external organic inputs. This resilience stems from specialized enzymes and transporters that optimize CO₂ uptake and utilization under varying , temperature, and oxygen levels, enabling proliferation in nutrient-poor or extreme habitats. For instance, many autotrophs employ transporters or mechanisms to access inorganic carbon, maintaining fixation rates even in CO₂-limited settings. Nutritional independence is a defining trait of autotrophs, as they derive all cellular carbon solely from inorganic forms such as CO₂ or (HCO₃⁻), supplemented only by mineral nutrients like and . This eliminates the need for organic carbon sources, allowing autotrophs to serve as primary producers in ecosystems by converting abiotic materials into .

Classification

Photoautotrophs

Photoautotrophs are organisms that utilize photons from as an energy source to drive carbon fixation, converting inorganic into organic compounds essential for their growth and . This phototrophic mode distinguishes them within the broader classification of autotrophs, enabling self-sufficiency in illuminated conditions without reliance on external . Examples include , , , and certain , all of which harness light to power biosynthetic processes. These organisms are predominantly distributed in sunlit environments, such as oceanic surface waters, terrestrial forests, and aerated soils, where penetration supports their needs. Photoautotrophs encompass both oxygenic and anoxygenic types, with oxygenic forms like and eukaryotic thriving in oxygen-rich, well-lit habitats, while anoxygenic variants, primarily , inhabit diverse niches including stratified columns, sediments, and extreme settings like hot springs and hypersaline lakes. Anoxygenic photoautotrophs exhibit broader phylogenetic distribution across and adapt to low- or anaerobic conditions, often coexisting with oxygenic counterparts in microbial mats. This distribution underscores their foundational role in global , fueling ecosystems through light-driven carbon assimilation. Key pigments in photoautotrophs facilitate efficient light harvesting across the . In oxygenic photoautotrophs, serves as the primary pigment, absorbing blue and red wavelengths, while accessory pigments such as and broaden the absorption range and protect against excess . , including beta-carotene, transfer to chlorophyll and dissipate harmful . Anoxygenic photoautotrophs employ bacteriochlorophylls (a, b, or g) alongside to capture near-infrared , enabling in shaded or deeper aquatic layers. These pigment systems optimize capture tailored to environmental light quality and intensity. A defining feature of oxygenic photoautotrophs is their ability to produce molecular oxygen as a byproduct during carbon fixation. This occurs through the light-dependent splitting of molecules in , releasing O₂ while providing electrons for the photosynthetic . This oxygen-evolving process, absent in anoxygenic types that use alternative electron donors like , has profoundly shaped Earth's oxygenated atmosphere. Photoautotrophs primarily achieve carbon fixation via , integrating light energy with enzymatic cycles to sustain global biogeochemical cycles.

Chemoautotrophs

Chemoautotrophs represent a subclass of autotrophs that obtain through the oxidation of inorganic chemical compounds, such as (H₂S), ferrous iron (Fe²⁺), and (NH₃), which they use to fix (CO₂) into organic compounds via . These organisms, primarily and , do not rely on light for production, distinguishing them from photoautotrophs within the broader classification of autotrophs. These organisms are predominantly distributed in dark, extreme environments where sunlight cannot penetrate, including deep-sea hydrothermal vents, terrestrial hot springs, and oxygen-poor sediments. In such aphotic habitats, chemoautotrophs form the base of unique ecosystems, supporting diverse communities by providing in the absence of photosynthetic . Metabolic diversity among chemoautotrophs is extensive, with many classified as lithoautotrophs due to their reliance on reduced inorganic minerals or compounds as donors for energy generation. They exhibit variations in oxygen requirements, including aerobic chemoautotrophs that utilize molecular oxygen (O₂) as the terminal and anaerobic counterparts that employ alternative acceptors such as (NO₃⁻) or (SO₄²⁻) to complete their oxidation processes. The energy yield from these inorganic oxidations varies but can be comparable to or higher than that of photoautotrophy in certain pathways, yet it is adequate to sustain carbon fixation and primary in light-deprived zones, enabling the persistence of in otherwise barren settings.

Mechanisms

Photosynthesis

Photosynthesis is the primary mechanism by which photoautotrophs, such as and certain , convert light energy into to synthesize organic compounds from inorganic sources like and . This occurs in specialized organelles called chloroplasts in eukaryotes or in the plasma membrane in prokaryotes, and it proceeds in two main stages: the , which capture to generate ATP and NADPH, and the light-independent reactions, known as the , which use these energy carriers to fix into carbohydrates. In the , pigments in I and II absorb light, primarily in the blue and red wavelengths, exciting electrons that drive an . This leads to the photolysis of molecules, releasing oxygen as a and providing electrons to reduce NADP+ to NADPH, while the proton gradient generated powers to produce ATP from ADP and inorganic . The overall for , balancing the inputs and outputs of both stages, is: 6CO2+6H2O+light energy→C6H12O6+6O26CO_2 + 6H_2O + \text{light energy} \rightarrow C_6H_{12}O_6 + 6O_2 The , occurring in the stroma, utilizes the ATP and NADPH from the light reactions to incorporate CO2 into organic molecules through three phases: carbon fixation, where the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase () catalyzes the reaction of CO2 with ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate to form two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate; reduction, in which these intermediates are phosphorylated and reduced to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate using ATP and NADPH; and regeneration, where some of the products are used to reform ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, allowing the cycle to continue. , the most abundant protein on Earth, is essential for this fixation step but can also act as an oxygenase under high oxygen conditions, leading to that reduces efficiency. The efficiency of photosynthesis in converting solar energy to biomass is typically low, around 1-2% for most crops, due to losses from incomplete light absorption, heat dissipation, and photorespiration, though some C4 plants like sugarcane achieve up to ~2% under optimal conditions. Variations exist, particularly in anoxygenic photosynthesis performed by certain bacteria, such as purple sulfur bacteria, which use hydrogen sulfide (H2S) instead of water as the electron donor, producing elemental sulfur rather than oxygen and allowing these organisms to thrive in anaerobic environments. Several environmental factors influence the rate of , including light intensity, which increases the rate up to a saturation point beyond which additional yields no further gain; , with (PAR) between 400-700 nm being most effective due to absorption peaks; and CO2 availability, as low concentrations limit the while elevated levels can enhance fixation up to a threshold. Water availability indirectly affects the process by influencing stomatal opening for CO2 uptake, and modulates activity, with optimal rates around 20-30°C for most .

Chemosynthesis

Chemosynthesis enables autotrophic organisms to harness energy from the oxidation of inorganic compounds through reactions, producing reducing equivalents like NADPH for the assimilation of (CO₂) into biomass without relying on . This occurs in environments rich in reduced chemicals, such as deep-sea hydrothermal vents or geochemical zones, where is absent or insufficient. Unlike light-dependent autotrophy, couples exergonic oxidation reactions to generate ATP via and to drive the reduction of NADP⁺, facilitating carbon fixation into organic molecules like carbohydrates. Key pathways in chemosynthesis involve the aerobic or anaerobic oxidation of substrates with low redox potentials. Common electron donors include (H₂S), which is oxidized to elemental (S⁰) or (SO₄²⁻), and (NH₃), oxidized to (NO₂⁻) or (NO₃⁻). For instance, in sulfur-oxidizing such as Thiobacillus, the overall reaction for glucose synthesis can be exemplified as: 18H2S+6CO2+3O2→C6H12O6+12H2O+18S18\mathrm{H_2S} + 6\mathrm{CO_2} + 3\mathrm{O_2} \rightarrow \mathrm{C_6H_{12}O_6} + 12\mathrm{H_2O} + 18\mathrm{S} This equation illustrates the complete transfer of from H₂S to O₂, yielding energy for . To generate NADPH, many chemosynthetic organisms employ reverse electron transport, where from high-potential donors are pushed uphill against the gradient using the proton motive force (PMF) established during substrate oxidation, reducing NADP⁺ to NADPH at the expense of additional ATP. The carbon fixation phase of chemosynthesis integrates seamlessly with the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle, the same pathway used in photosynthetic autotrophs, where ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) catalyzes CO₂ addition to ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, forming 3-phosphoglycerate. This is followed by reduction to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate using chemically derived ATP and NADPH, with subsequent regeneration of the CO₂ acceptor. The primary distinction lies in the sourcing of these cofactors: ATP from substrate-level phosphorylation or electron transport chains, and NADPH from reverse transport or direct reductant use, rather than photosystems. This shared mechanism underscores the metabolic versatility of the CBB cycle across energy sources. Despite its effectiveness in niche habitats, is energetically demanding, with the CBB cycle requiring 3 ATP and 2 NADPH per CO₂ fixed—equating to 18 ATP and 12 NADPH for one glucose molecule—often exceeded by the variable yields from inorganic oxidations, which can provide fewer high-energy electrons per mole compared to capture in . This high cost limits productivity unless compensated by abundant, concentrated substrates, rendering the process heavily dependent on localized geochemical gradients, such as those in vent fluids or sediment layers, where reduced compounds like H₂S or H₂ are continuously supplied. A notable variation is the reductive form of in methanogenic , which diverges from the oxidative norm by using the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway for CO₂ fixation. Here, CO₂ serves as both carbon source and , reduced to formyl groups and ultimately via (H₂) oxidation, enabling autotrophic growth and (CH₄) production under strictly anaerobic conditions. This pathway, prevalent in phyla like Euryarchaeota, highlights reductive chemolithoautotrophy as an ancient adaptation to hydrogen-rich, anoxic environments. Chemoautotrophs, primarily and , are the main practitioners of these processes.

Examples

In Plants and Algae

Vascular plants, particularly angiosperms, represent a major group of photoautotrophic autotrophs, utilizing to convert sunlight, , and into organic compounds. A prominent example is , a small in the family, widely studied as a for understanding photosynthetic processes and genetic regulation in higher plants due to its compact genome and rapid life cycle. These plants have evolved diverse carbon fixation pathways to optimize CO₂ uptake under varying environmental conditions: the C3 pathway, predominant in about 85% of vascular plants like and , directly fixes CO₂ into a three-carbon compound but is less efficient in hot, dry climates due to ; the C4 pathway, found in approximately 3% of species such as and , concentrates CO₂ in bundle sheath cells to minimize loss and enhance efficiency in tropical environments; and the Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) pathway, used by succulents like cacti and pineapples, temporally separates CO₂ fixation at night to conserve in arid habitats. Algae, as eukaryotic photoautotrophs, exhibit a wide range of forms from unicellular to multicellular, contributing significantly to aquatic primary production through photosynthesis. Unicellular green algae such as Chlorella vulgaris thrive in freshwater and soil environments, serving as simple models for studying photosynthetic efficiency and biofuel potential due to their rapid growth and high lipid content. In contrast, multicellular macroalgae like kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera), a type of brown alga, form extensive underwater forests in coastal marine ecosystems, where they grow up to 50 meters long and provide habitat while fixing substantial carbon. Algae also drive phytoplankton blooms in oceans and lakes, where dense populations of species like diatoms and dinoflagellates rapidly increase biomass in response to nutrient upwelling, temporarily dominating local autotrophic production. Adaptations in plants and algae enhance light capture and across diverse habitats. In vascular , leaves feature broad, flat surfaces to maximize absorption, thin cuticles for minimal light obstruction, and mesophyll cells packed with chloroplasts oriented perpendicularly to light rays; vertical leaf orientations in shaded understories reduce self-shading, while horizontal arrangements in open areas capture diffuse light. display similar optimizations, such as the chlorophyll-packed thylakoids in Chlorella for efficient photon harvesting in low-light waters, and the blade-like fronds of that orient toward surface light via gas-filled bladders. Symbiotic relationships further extend algal autotrophy: in lichens, like Trebouxia provide photosynthetic products to fungal partners in nutrient-poor environments such as rocks and bark; in corals, (Symbiodinium) supply up to 90% of the host's energy needs through in nutrient-limited reef waters. Collectively, plants and algae account for approximately 99% of Earth's autotrophic biomass, with terrestrial vascular plants comprising the bulk at around 450 gigatons of carbon, dwarfing contributions from microbial autotrophs.

In Bacteria and Archaea

Bacteria and archaea represent the primary domains of prokaryotic autotrophs, exhibiting remarkable diversity in their metabolic strategies for carbon fixation. Among bacteria, cyanobacteria stand out as the sole prokaryotes capable of oxygenic photosynthesis, utilizing water as an electron donor to produce oxygen while fixing carbon dioxide into biomass. For instance, the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus thrives in oligotrophic ocean environments, contributing significantly to global primary production through its efficient photosynthetic machinery. These organisms played a pivotal role in Earth's oxygenation, with fossil evidence indicating their ancient origins and involvement in the Great Oxidation Event around 2.4 billion years ago. In contrast, anoxygenic photoautotrophic , such as from the family Chromatiaceae (e.g., Chromatium species), perform without , relying on a or b to capture light energy. These microbes oxidize reduced compounds like as electron donors, depositing elemental granules intracellularly, and inhabit anaerobic aquatic environments such as stratified lakes and sediments. Their photosynthetic apparatus allows them to occupy niches where oxygenic phototrophs cannot, facilitating carbon fixation in sulfidic conditions. Chemoautotrophic bacteria derive energy from inorganic chemical oxidations, independent of , and are essential in nutrient cycling. Ammonia-oxidizing like Nitrosomonas species convert to in the first step of , fixing CO₂ via the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle in aerobic soils and waters. Similarly, sulfur-oxidizing such as Thiobacillus oxidize reduced sulfur compounds (e.g., or elemental ) to , supporting autotrophy in environments like hot springs and marine sediments. These processes underpin biogeochemical cycles, with Thiobacillus species demonstrating high efficiency in energy conservation through electron transport chains. Autotrophic , often extremophiles, expand prokaryotic autotrophy into harsh settings like deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Methanogenic , such as Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, are hyperthermophilic chemoautotrophs that produce from CO₂ and H₂, utilizing a unique Wood-Ljungdahl pathway for carbon fixation at temperatures exceeding 80°C. These organisms dominate vent microbiomes, where they form the base of chemosynthetic food webs. Other hyperthermophilic forms, including those in the Methanococci order, thrive under high pressure and temperature, synthesizing all cellular components from inorganic precursors. The genetic underpinnings of autotrophy in and are shaped by extensive (HGT), which disseminates key pathways across lineages. For example, genes encoding enzymes for the 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle in some likely originated from bacterial donors via HGT, enabling adaptation to diverse geochemical niches. This mechanism fosters metabolic innovation, allowing sporadic distribution of autotrophic traits and enhancing prokaryotic resilience in extreme environments.

Ecological Significance

Role in Food Webs

Autotrophs occupy the base of food webs as primary producers, converting approximately 1-2% of incoming into via in most ecosystems, while chemoautotrophs can achieve higher conversion efficiencies relative to available sources such as or , often exceeding those of photoautotrophs in suitable environments. This foundational role positions autotrophs at the first , where they capture and store that is otherwise unavailable to heterotrophic organisms, initiating the unidirectional flow of energy through ecosystems. The biomass produced by autotrophs directly supports herbivores, which consume plant material or , transferring energy to trophic level with only about 10% efficiency per level due to metabolic losses and waste. This energy then cascades to carnivores and higher-order predators, sustaining complex trophic structures, while uneaten or senescent autotrophic material forms that fuels decomposers like and fungi, ensuring nutrient recycling and preventing energy bottlenecks in the web. By providing this essential energy base, autotrophs underpin across varied environments, enabling intricate food webs in terrestrial forests through tree and understory plants, in oceanic systems via , and in soil ecosystems with microbial and root-associated producers that harbor diverse microbial and faunal communities. For human societies, autotrophic agricultural crops such as , , and form the cornerstone of the global food supply, directly feeding billions and indirectly supporting through their , which accounts for the majority of caloric intake worldwide.

Primary Production

Primary production represents the rate at which autotrophs synthesize organic compounds from inorganic carbon sources, serving as the foundational input of into ecosystems worldwide. This process is quantified as the amount of carbon fixed per unit area per unit time, typically in grams of carbon per square meter per year (g C m⁻² yr⁻¹). Gross primary production (GPP) encompasses the total carbon assimilated through or before any respiratory losses, while net primary production (NPP) accounts for the subtraction of autotrophic respiration, yielding the actual available for growth, storage, or transfer to higher trophic levels. Global estimates of highlight the dominance of photoautotrophs, with terrestrial and oceanic accounting for the majority. Annual NPP totals approximately 105 Gt C yr⁻¹ across the , comprising about 56 Gt C yr⁻¹ from terrestrial ecosystems and 50 Gt C yr⁻¹ from marine . Terrestrial GPP, driven largely by vascular , reaches 100–150 Gt C yr⁻¹, reflecting higher fixation rates offset by substantial respiration. Oceanic GPP is estimated at 100–150 Gt C yr⁻¹, but NPP is lower due to efficient respiratory demands in communities. These figures underscore autotrophs' central role in the global , fixing approximately 200-250 Gt C annually through GPP. Variations in primary production occur at multiple scales, influenced by environmental s. Net primary production generally constitutes 40–60% of GPP globally, varying by ; for instance, forests exhibit higher NPP efficiency than open oceans due to differing respiratory costs. Seasonally, production peaks during periods of optimal and temperature, such as spring blooms in temperate or summer growth in tropical forests, often declining by 50–80% in winter or dry seasons. Latitudinally, productivity follows a , with maximal rates in equatorial regions (up to 2,000 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹ in tropical rainforests) decreasing toward poles (as low as 100 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹ in or polar seas), driven by and temperature constraints. Key factors influencing include availability, temperature, and light or chemical energy gradients. such as and limit production in many systems, with deficiencies reducing fixation rates by up to 90% in -poor oceans or soils; for example, iron scarcity in high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC) regions caps growth. Temperature modulates enzymatic rates in and , with optima around 20–30°C for most photoautotrophs, beyond which production declines due to stress. Light intensity and quality drive photoautotrophic rates, while chemical gradients (e.g., or concentrations) sustain chemoautotrophs in dark environments. These factors interact synergistically, as elevated temperatures can exacerbate demands. Measurement of primary production relies on a combination of direct and indirect techniques to capture both local and global scales. The ¹⁴C uptake , a standard method, involves incubating or samples with radioactive to track carbon incorporation into , providing precise GPP or NPP estimates at rates from 0.1 to 100 µg C L⁻¹ h⁻¹. via s, such as NASA's MODIS or SeaWiFS, infers production from chlorophyll-a concentrations and , enabling global mapping with resolutions down to 1 km and accuracies within 20–30% of data. These approaches are calibrated against each other to account for methodological biases, such as bottle effects in ¹⁴C assays or interference in satellite observations.

Autotrophs in Extreme Environments

Autotrophs thrive in extreme environments where conditions such as , low light, extreme temperatures, acidity, or isolation preclude typical photosynthetic or heterotrophic life, relying instead on specialized metabolic adaptations to harness inorganic energy sources for carbon fixation. These organisms, including chemoautotrophs and photoautotrophs with extremophile traits, form the base of unique food webs and contribute to global biogeochemical cycles despite occupying niche habitats. Their resilience highlights the breadth of autotrophic strategies evolved to exploit geochemical gradients in Earth's most inhospitable settings. In deep-sea hydrothermal vents, chemoautotrophic bacteria form symbiotic relationships with macrofauna like the giant tubeworm Riftia pachyptila, enabling fixation through the oxidation of (H₂S) derived from vent fluids. These symbionts, housed in the worm's trophosome, use the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle to convert CO₂ into , powering the host's growth in the absence of and supporting dense vent communities that include grazers and predators. Recent studies reveal that these symbionts possess dual carbon fixation pathways, including a reductive pathway alongside the Calvin cycle, enhancing efficiency under fluctuating and oxygen levels. This chemosynthetic foundation sustains entire ecosystems isolated from surface productivity. In polar regions, photoautotrophic , such as diatoms and like sp. ICE-L, colonize the underside of , adapting to perpetual low temperatures, high from channels, and minimal light penetration. These psychrophilic organisms maintain photosynthetic activity through cold-stable enzymes, proteins that prevent damage, and shade-adapted configurations that maximize capture in dim conditions. By forming dense blooms in spring, they initiate seasonal , seeding the water column with organic carbon upon ice melt and supporting and food webs. Their adaptations, including enhanced and protective osmolytes, allow survival at temperatures below -10°C and salinities up to 200 ppt. Acidic and hot springs host thermophilic chemoautotrophs, exemplified by in the phylum Aquificae such as Aquifex pyrophilus, which perform by oxidizing molecular hydrogen (H₂) or inorganic compounds in environments exceeding 80°C and below 3. These lithoautotrophs fix CO₂ via the reverse tricarboxylic acid cycle, deriving energy from geochemical reactions in sulfur- and iron-rich fluids, as seen in Yellowstone National Park's geothermal features. Their heat-stable proteins and membranes enable growth up to 95°C, the highest recorded for , while tolerating acidity through proton pumps and acidophilic cell walls. Such communities drive mineral cycling in terrestrial extremes, influencing spring geochemistry. Deep subsurface aquifers harbor lithoautotrophic microbes that oxidize reduced minerals like ferrous iron (Fe²⁺), , or in oxygen-poor, kilometer-deep rock fractures, sustaining isolated biospheres with minimal external inputs. These organisms, including sulfate-reducing and iron oxidizers, fix CO₂ using energy from lithotrophic reactions, forming biofilms on minerals and contributing to chemistry over geological timescales. Their presence in rocks up to 3 km deep underscores metabolic versatility in energy-scarce settings, with implications for as analogs for subsurface life on Mars or icy moons, where similar geochemical niches may support . Detection via isotopic signatures and confirms their activity in low-biomass environments. Climate change exacerbates stresses on extreme autotroph communities, with from CO₂ uptake projected to alter ecosystems by lowering pH and disrupting chemistry, potentially shifting chemoautotrophic assemblages toward acid-tolerant taxa. In vents, increased acidity may inhibit symbiont-mediated CO₂ fixation in hosts, reducing and altering dynamics, as observed in shallow vent analogs where acidification decreases macrofaunal abundance and favors microbial opportunists. Polar face thinner ice from warming, leading to earlier blooms but heightened UV exposure and fluctuations that challenge psychrophilic adaptations. Subsurface lithoautotrophs could experience indirect impacts via altered from thaw, though their isolation buffers direct effects. These shifts position extreme autotrophs as sentinels for broader environmental changes.

Evolutionary Aspects

Origin of Autotrophic Life

Autotrophic life is believed to have emerged during the Eon, approximately 3.5 to 4.0 billion years ago, in an atmosphere devoid of free oxygen. This timeline aligns with the formation of the earliest and the onset of habitable conditions on , where reducing gases like (H₂) and (CO₂) were abundant. Primordial systems, rich in H₂, CO₂, and iron-sulfide (FeS) minerals, likely provided the geochemical gradients necessary for proto-chemosynthetic processes, enabling the fixation of inorganic carbon into organic compounds without reliance on external organic sources. Geochemical and fossil evidence supports the antiquity of autotrophy. Stromatolites, layered structures formed by microbial mats, dating back to about 3.5 billion years ago in formations like the in , represent some of the oldest indicators of photoautotrophic activity, where early microbial communities, likely anoxygenic phototrophs, trapped sediments while fixing carbon. Additionally, carbon isotopic signatures showing δ¹³C depletion (typically -20 to -30‰ relative to inorganic carbon) in kerogens and graphites from sites like the Isua Supracrustal Belt in provide direct evidence of , as this fractionation pattern is characteristic of enzymatic processes like those in early autotrophs. These signatures, preserved in metasedimentary rocks up to 3.7 billion years old, distinguish biogenic carbon from abiotic sources. Hypotheses regarding the biochemical origins of autotrophy point to acetogenesis via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway as one of the earliest forms, utilizing H₂ and CO₂ to produce acetate in anaerobic environments, potentially predating more complex cycles. This pathway may have evolved from non-enzymatic precursors in the , where ribozymes facilitated proto-carbon fixation reactions that later gave rise to enzymes like in the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle. , particularly in hydrothermal settings, is considered the likely initial mechanism before the advent of light-dependent autotrophy. The transition to oxygenic , driven by around 2.7 to 2.4 billion years ago, culminated in the approximately 2.4 billion years ago, when oxygen levels rose dramatically, reshaping Earth's geochemistry and enabling aerobic life.

Evolutionary Diversification

The evolutionary diversification of autotrophs involved key mechanisms such as endosymbiosis and , which facilitated the spread of photosynthetic capabilities across domains of life. A pivotal event was the primary endosymbiosis approximately 1.5 billion years ago, when a eukaryotic host engulfed a cyanobacterium, leading to the origin of chloroplasts in the lineage ancestral to (including , , and ). This event enabled oxygenic in eukaryotes, marking a major expansion of autotrophic metabolism beyond prokaryotes. (HGT) further propelled diversification by disseminating core autotrophic genes, such as those encoding variants, across bacterial and archaeal lineages; for instance, Form III RuBisCO, originally archaeal, was transferred to bacteria like those in the , allowing novel carbon fixation strategies in diverse microbial communities. Adaptations to environmental pressures drove further branching in autotrophic pathways. In plants, the evolution of C4 and (CAM) photosynthesis arose as responses to arid conditions and high rates, with C4 emerging independently over 60 times in grasses and other angiosperms during the (around 20-30 million years ago) to concentrate CO2 and minimize water loss, while CAM evolved in succulents like cacti for nocturnal CO2 uptake in water-scarce habitats. Earlier in Earth's history, during low-oxygen eras like the , anoxygenic photoautotrophy diversified among (e.g., and green sulfur ) using electron donors such as instead of water, sustaining in anoxic environments before the rise of oxygenic forms. Major radiations of autotrophs were triggered by global geochemical shifts. Following the around 2.4 billion years ago, oxygenic autotrophs like underwent explosive diversification, oxidizing vast iron deposits and enabling the proliferation of aerobic ecosystems that supported eukaryotic evolution. Concurrently, the initiation and spread of from about 3 billion years ago created deep-sea hydrothermal vents, fostering chemosynthetic autotroph communities (e.g., epsilonproteobacteria using sulfur oxidation) that formed isolated, high-biomass oases independent of sunlight and drove the evolution of vent-specific symbioses. In modern contexts, insights from autotrophic diversification inform efforts to enhance production. Researchers have engineered autotrophic microbes, such as and , by introducing or optimizing pathways like the for lipid accumulation, yielding strains that convert CO2 directly into biofuels like with improved efficiency over wild types.

Historical Development

Early Discoveries

One of the earliest experimental investigations into was conducted by Flemish physician and Jan Baptista van Helmont in the early . In his famous willow tree experiment, begun around 1600 and documented in his posthumously published work Ortus medicinae (1648), van Helmont planted a 2.27 kg willow sapling in a tub containing 90 kg of dry , watering it only with rainwater over five years. The tree grew to 77 kg, yet the soil's weight decreased by only 57 grams, leading him to conclude that the was not the primary source of the plant's mass increase and suggesting water as the main nutrient contributor. This challenged prevailing Aristotelian views that plants derived their substance solely from but perpetuated a misconception by overlooking other inputs like carbon from the air. In the 1770s, English chemist advanced understanding through experiments demonstrating ' role in air revitalization. In 1771, Priestley placed a in a sealed jar where it soon suffocated, but introducing a mint allowed another to survive longer, and a relit after the 's exposure to . He reported in 1772 that "restore" air fouled by or respiration, noting the effect in the presence of , as detailed in his publication Observations on Different Kinds of Air (1772). These findings highlighted ' active gaseous exchange but initially did not connect it to carbon fixation, maintaining the idea that mineral uptake from soil was central to growth. By the , German chemist shifted focus to mineral nutrition, building on earlier work to emphasize inorganic elements' role. In his 1840 book Die organische Chemie in ihrer Anwendung auf Agrikulturchemie und Physiologie (Organic Chemistry in Its Applications to and ), Liebig argued that require specific minerals like , , and from soil or fertilizers for optimal growth, introducing the "law of the minimum" that growth is limited by the scarcest essential nutrient. This framework revolutionized by promoting synthetic fertilizers but reinforced misconceptions that synthesized purely from minerals, underestimating atmospheric carbon dioxide's contribution until later clarified by studies. The concept of autotrophs as self-nourishing organisms emerged late in the . In 1892, German botanist Albert Bernhard Frank coined the term "Autotrophen" in his textbook Lehrbuch der Botanik, applying it to organisms producing organic compounds from inorganic sources. This terminology encapsulated the growing recognition that certain life forms, particularly , could sustain themselves without external organic inputs, resolving earlier confusions about origins.

Key Scientific Advances

In the mid-20th century, significant progress was made in understanding autotrophic carbon fixation pathways. During the 1930s and 1940s, researchers laid groundwork for elucidating the biochemical mechanisms of , culminating in the 1950 discovery of the Calvin-Benson cycle by , James Bassham, and Andrew Benson at the , through experiments using radioactive to trace CO₂ incorporation in . This cycle revealed how autotrophs fix inorganic carbon into organic compounds via ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (), earning Calvin the 1961 and establishing the foundation for photosynthetic biochemistry. Concurrently, the concept of , first proposed by Sergei Winogradsky in the late 19th century through his 1887 studies on sulfur-oxidizing bacteria like , gained advanced validation in the early via microbiological techniques that confirmed energy derivation from chemical oxidations without light, expanding autotrophy beyond phototrophs. The 1970s marked a breakthrough in discovering chemoautotrophic ecosystems independent of sunlight. In 1977, expeditions using the deep-sea submersible Alvin along the Galápagos Rift identified hydrothermal vents teeming with life, including tube worms and clams symbiotic with sulfur-oxidizing bacteria that fix CO₂ chemosynthetically, challenging prior views of surface-dependent primary production. These findings, detailed in subsequent analyses, demonstrated dense biomass supported by geochemical energy, with vent fluids providing reduced compounds like hydrogen sulfide for autotrophic metabolism. From the 2000s onward, genomic approaches unveiled the diversity of , the key in autotrophic carbon fixation. High-throughput sequencing efforts mapped RuBisCO variants across prokaryotes, revealing form IA and IB enzymes in diverse autotrophs like and , with adaptations optimizing CO₂ capture efficiency in varying environments. A 2020 study systematically screened homologs from uncultured microbes, identifying highly active forms with up to 30% higher rates than canonical plant versions, informing evolutionary and insights. Advancements in have enabled targeted enhancements of autotrophy. In 2022, -Cas9 was adapted for the autotrophic Methanococcus maripaludis, allowing precise knockouts and insertions to study hydrogenotrophic CO₂ fixation pathways. Similarly, a 2023 CRISPR interference screen in the chemolithoautotroph Eubacterium limosum identified genes boosting autotrophic growth rates up to fourfold under lithotrophic conditions, paving the way for engineered microbes in carbon capture. Climate models increasingly incorporate autotroph feedbacks, particularly regarding . Projections from Earth system models indicate that rising atmospheric CO₂ will amplify acidification, with studies suggesting potential reductions in for autotrophic calcifiers like coccolithophores under high-emission scenarios by 2100, while elevated CO₂ may enhance in some non-calcifying . These feedbacks, including altered , can influence pH declines through carbon-climate interactions. In the 2020s, research on microbial dark carbon fixation—CO₂ assimilation without light—has revised global estimates. Studies in soils quantified rates of 4-18 mg C kg⁻¹ soil day⁻¹ by and using pathways like the Wood-Ljungdahl cycle, contributing 0.012–0.039% of organic carbon. Global estimates suggest dark fixation may account for 1-8% of terrestrial , previously overlooked in some models. A 2020 analysis in ecosystems showed dark fixation rates scaling with microbial , contributing approximately 0.035% of stocks and necessitating updates to models under elevated CO₂.

References

  1. https://pressbooks.umn.edu/introbio/chapter/ecosystemenergy/
  2. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/glossary/glossary_5.html
  3. https://oertx.highered.texas.gov/courseware/lesson/1856/overview
  4. https://www.labxchange.org/library/items/lb:LabXchange:b57d5d78:html:1
  5. https://manoa.hawaii.edu/exploringourfluidearth/biological/aquatic-plants-and-algae/energy-acquisition
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3970417/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12312397/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/autotrophy
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10173188/
  10. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/AEM.02473-10
  11. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43705-023-00327-4
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/autotroph
  13. https://connects.catalyst.harvard.edu/Profiles/profile/1221276
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3210925/
  15. https://oertx.highered.texas.gov/courseware/lesson/1856/student/?section=11
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4791109/
  17. https://rcn.montana.edu/Publications/Pdf/2005/3_12Madigan.pdf
  18. https://opened.cuny.edu/courseware/lesson/852/student/?section=2
  19. https://opened.cuny.edu/courseware/lesson/645/student/?section=9
  20. https://open.lib.umn.edu/horticulture/chapter/11-2-light-and-photosynthesis/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7714679/
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2606770/
  23. https://bioprinciples.biosci.gatech.edu/08-converting-light-energy-into-chemical-energy/
  24. https://academic.oup.com/femsre/article/32/5/815/557624
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/chemoautotroph
  26. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/vent-ecosystems-exploration-notes.pdf
  27. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(Boundless)/05%3A_Microbial_Metabolism/5.01%3A_Types_of_Metabolism/5.1B%3A_Chemoautotrophs_and_Chemohetrotrophs
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/chemoautotroph
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9191640/
  30. https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/biology/photosynthesis/the-process-of-photosynthesis
  31. https://www.life.illinois.edu/govindjee/paper/gov.html
  32. https://www.employees.csbsju.edu/ssaupe/biol115/photosynthesis.htm
  33. https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/biology/chapter/the-light-dependent-reactions-of-photosynthesis/
  34. https://www.etsu.edu/uschool/faculty/tadlockd/documents/apbio_chp_10_lectout.pdf
  35. https://www.bu.edu/aldolase/biochemistry2/27_Photosynthesis_3.pdf
  36. https://northinlet.sc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/photosynthesis-overview.pdf
  37. https://www.pioneer.com/us/agronomy/c3-c4-photosynthesis-crop-production.html
  38. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980RSPTA.295..477B/abstract
  39. https://www.life.illinois.edu/govindjee/Part3/7_TimeLineBacteria.pdf
  40. https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/biology/photosynthesis/factors-affecting-photosynthesis
  41. https://labs.plb.ucdavis.edu/courses/bis/1c/text/Chapter10nf.pdf
  42. https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/biology/photosynthesis
  43. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/chemosynthesis-fact-sheet.pdf
  44. https://www.ck12.org/flexi/physical-science/scope-of-chemistry/what-is-the-process-of-chemosynthesis-involving-hydrogen-sulfide/
  45. https://open.oregonstate.education/generalmicrobiology/chapter/chemolithotrophy-nitrogen-metabolism/
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6282030/
  47. https://open.oregonstate.education/generalmicrobiology/chapter/05%3A_Microbial_Metabolism/5.12%3A_Biosynthesis/5.12C%3A_The_Calvin_Cycle
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084952123000708
  49. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01936/full
  50. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1815631116
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7289024/
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29618591/
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5887134/
  54. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/photosynthesis-in-plants/photorespiration--c3-c4-cam-plants/a/c3-c4-and-cam-plants-agriculture
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3075750/
  56. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-microbiology/chapter/algae/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7593248/
  58. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26388081.2020.1715256
  59. https://www.thoughtco.com/major-types-of-algae-373409
  60. https://www.cdc.gov/harmful-algal-blooms/about/types-of-harmful-algal-blooms.html
  61. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/General_Biology_%28Boundless%29/30%253A_Plant_Form_and_Physiology/30.10%253A_Leaves_-_Leaf_Structure_Function_and_Adaptation
  62. https://www.rhs.org.uk/advice/understanding-plants/how-plants-use-light-to-grow
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211926425003340
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098117303805
  65. https://britishlichensociety.org.uk/learning/what-is-a-lichen
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3740780/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6016768/
  68. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1307701110
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5019231/
  70. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-025-02637-3
  71. https://web.gps.caltech.edu/~wfischer/pubs/Fischeretal2016a.pdf
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224592/
  73. https://instr.bact.wisc.edu/book/displayarticle/98
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4086895/
  75. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2981&context=biosci_pubs
  76. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.273.5278.1058
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6616113/
  78. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-021-01828-5
  79. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05284-4
  80. https://fire.biol.wwu.edu/cmoyer/zztemp_fire/biol345_F10/papers/Berg_carbon_fixation_natrevmicro10.pdf
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms1768
  82. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Ecology/Environmental_Science_%28LibreTexts%29/15:_Community_and_Ecosystem_Ecology/15.05:_Energy_Flow_Through_Ecosystems
  83. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/ecology/intro-to-ecosystems/a/energy-flow-primary-productivity
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/detrital-food-web
  85. https://open.maricopa.edu/environmentalscience/chapter/energy-flow-through-ecosystems/
  86. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/food-web/
  87. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/power-and-energy/food-chains-and-food-webs
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4507207/
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/net-primary-production
  90. https://lpvs.gsfc.nasa.gov/GPP-NPP/GPPNPP_home.html
  91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982223012861
  92. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2012GL053461
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825223000119
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927823000333
  95. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-58702-3
  96. https://rwu.pressbooks.pub/webboceanography/chapter/7-3-factors-influencing-production/
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11874050/
  98. https://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/research_methods/biogeochemical/productivity.html
  99. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2001GB001444
  100. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2014.00019/full
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220310757
  102. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-024-01704-y
  103. https://www.oeb.harvard.edu/news/dual-carbon-fixation-mechanisms-enable-tubeworm-survival-harsh-hydrothermal-vent-conditions
  104. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mbio.02243-19
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220308459
  106. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.16648
  107. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100002095/downloads/20100002095.pdf
  108. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00199/full
  109. https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/nature/thermophilic-bacteria.htm
  110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014579399006638
  111. https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/85/3/452/583580
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6307999/
  113. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.572252/full
  114. https://academic.oup.com/femsre/article-pdf/20/3-4/327/18123435/20-3-4-327.pdf
  115. https://astrobiology.com/2025/03/microbial-ecology-of-the-deep-terrestrial-subsurface.html
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10505797/
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935123023186
  118. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-019-0222-5
  119. https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/chapter/chapter-5/
  120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825220303421
  121. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2006.1834
  122. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0903323106
  123. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00817/full
  124. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7610757/
  125. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23286-7
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4755140/
  127. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4547232/
  128. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7895386/
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9434201/
  130. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10872-z
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3111178/
  132. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41428-022-00675-3
  133. https://employees.csbsju.edu/ssaupe/biol106/lectures/science_van_Helmont.pdf
  134. https://www.lindahall.org/about/news/scientist-of-the-day/joan-baptista-van-helmont/
  135. https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/josephpriestleyoxygen.html
  136. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1988/8792-highlights-in-photosynthesis-research/
  137. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/how-plants-produce-dioxygen
  138. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351055x
  139. https://www.encyclopedie-environnement.org/en/zoom/some-pioneers-in-plant-mineral-nutrition/
  140. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/fertilizer-history-p2/
  141. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/phototrophy
  142. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30374727/
  143. https://portlandpress.com/biochemsoctrans/article/46/1/131/66484/The-importance-of-the-photosynthetic-Gibbs-effect
  144. https://academic.oup.com/femsre/article/36/2/364/565076
  145. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.203.4385.1073
  146. https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/benchmarks-february-17-1977-hydrothermal-vents-are-discovered/
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2168653/
  148. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/embj.2019104081
  149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9430280/
  150. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2216244120
  151. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.584445/full
  152. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1480484/full
  153. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2720-8
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.