Hubbry Logo
NematodeNematodeMain
Open search
Nematode
Community hub
Nematode
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nematode
Nematode
Nematode
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Nematode
Temporal range: Early Devonian – Recent[1] Possible Cambrian occurrence[2]
Caenorhabditis elegans,
a model species of roundworm
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Subkingdom: Eumetazoa
Clade: ParaHoxozoa
Clade: Bilateria
Clade: Nephrozoa
Clade: Protostomia
Superphylum: Ecdysozoa
Clade: Nematoida
Phylum: Nematoda
Diesing, 1861
Classes

(see text)

Synonyms
  • Nematodes Burmeister, 1837
  • Nematoidea sensu stricto Cobb, 1919
  • Nemates Cobb, 1919
  • Nemata Cobb, 1919 emend.

The nematodes (/ˈnɛmətoʊdz/ NEM-ə-tohdz or NEEM-; Ancient Greek: Νηματώδη; Latin: Nematoda), roundworms or eelworms constitute the phylum Nematoda. Species in the phylum inhabit a broad range of environments. Most species are free-living, feeding on microorganisms, but many are parasitic. Parasitic worms (helminths) are the cause of soil-transmitted helminthiases.

They are classified along with arthropods, tardigrades and other moulting animals in the clade Ecdysozoa. Unlike the flatworms, nematodes have a tubular digestive system, with openings at both ends. Like tardigrades, they have a reduced number of Hox genes, but their sister phylum Nematomorpha has kept the ancestral protostome Hox genotype, which shows that the reduction has occurred within the nematode phylum.[3]

Nematode species can be difficult to distinguish from one another. Consequently, estimates of the number of nematode species are uncertain. A 2013 survey of animal biodiversity suggested there are over 25,000.[4][5] Estimates of the total number of extant species are subject to even greater variation. A widely referenced 1993 article estimated there might be over a million species of nematode.[6] A subsequent publication challenged this claim, estimating the figure to be at least 40,000 species.[7] Although the highest estimates (up to 100 million species) have since been deprecated, estimates supported by rarefaction curves,[8][9] together with the use of DNA barcoding[10] and the increasing acknowledgment of widespread cryptic species among nematodes,[11] have placed the figure closer to one million species.[12]

Nematodes have successfully adapted to nearly every ecosystem: from marine (salt) to fresh water, soils, from the polar regions to the tropics, as well as the highest to the lowest of elevations. They are ubiquitous in freshwater, marine, and terrestrial environments, where they often outnumber other animals in both individual and species counts, and are found in locations as diverse as mountains, deserts, and oceanic trenches. They are found in every part of the Earth's lithosphere,[13] even at great depths, 0.9–3.6 km (3,000–12,000 ft) below the surface of the Earth in gold mines in South Africa.[13] They represent 90% of all animals on the ocean floor.[14] In total, 4.4 × 1020 nematodes inhabit the Earth's topsoil, or approximately 60 billion for each human, with the highest densities observed in tundra and boreal forests.[15] Their numerical dominance, often exceeding a million individuals per square meter and accounting for about 80% of all individual animals on Earth, their diversity of lifecycles, and their presence at various trophic levels point to an important role in many ecosystems.[15][16] They play crucial roles in polar ecosystems.[17][18] The roughly 2,271 genera are placed in 256 families.[19] The many parasitic forms include pathogens in most plants and animals. A third of the genera occur as parasites of vertebrates; about 35 nematode species are human parasites.[19]

Etymology

[edit]

The word nematode comes from the Modern Latin compound of nema- 'thread' (from Greek nema, genitive nematos 'thread', from the stem nein 'to spin'; cf. needle) + -odes 'like, of the nature of' (cf. -oid). The addition firstly of '-oid' and then to '-ode' renders 'threadlike'.[20]

Taxonomy and systematics

[edit]
See also: List of nematode families

History

[edit]
Carl Linnaeus described nematodes including the parasitic Dracunculus medinensis, seen here under a person's skin.[21]

In 1758, Carl Linnaeus described nematodes of a few genera including Ascaris and Dracunculus, then included in the Vermes.[21] The name of the group Nematoda, informally called "nematodes", came from Nematoidea, originally defined by Karl Rudolphi in 1808,[22] from Ancient Greek νῆμα (nêma, nêmatos, 'thread') and -ειδής (-eidēs, 'species') (cf. native German Fadenwurm < Faden (yarn, thread) + Wurm, attested since the mid of 18th). It was treated as family Nematodes by Burmeister in 1837.[22] At its origin, the "Nematoidea" erroneously included Nematodes and Nematomorpha, attributed by Karl Theodor Ernst von Siebold in 1843. Along with Acanthocephala, Trematoda, and Cestoidea, it formed the obsolete group Entozoa,[23] created by Rudolphi in 1808.[24] They were classed along with Acanthocephala in the obsolete phylum Nemathelminthes by Gegenbaur in 1859.[22] In 1861, Karl Moriz Diesing treated the group as order Nematoda.[22] In 1877, the taxon Nematoidea, including the family Gordiidae (horsehair worms), was promoted to the rank of phylum by Ray Lankester.[22] The first clear distinction between the nemas and gordiids was realized by František Vejdovsky when he named the group containing the horsehair worms the order Nematomorpha in 1886.[25]

In 1910, Grobben proposed the phylum Aschelminthes, and the nematodes were included as class Nematoda alongside the classes Rotifera, Gastrotricha, Kinorhyncha, Priapulida, and Nematomorpha.[26]In 1919, Nathan Cobb proposed that nematodes should be recognized alone as a phylum. He argued they should be called "nema" in English rather than "nematodes" and defined the taxon Nemates (later emended as Nemata, Latin plural of nema), listing Nematoidea sensu restricto as a synonym.[27] In 1932, Potts elevated the class Nematoda to the level of phylum, leaving the name the same. Although Potts' and Cobb's classifications are equivalent, both names are used, and Nematode became a popular term in zoological science.[28]

Phylogeny

[edit]

The phylogenetic relationships of the nematodes and their close relatives among the protostomes are unresolved. Traditionally, they were held to be a lineage of their own, but in the 1990s, they were proposed to form the group Ecdysozoa together with moulting animals, such as arthropods. The identity of the closest living relatives of the Nematoda has always been considered to be well resolved. Morphological and molecular phylogenetics agree with placing the roundworms as a sister taxon to the parasitic Nematomorpha; together, they make up the Nematoida. Along with the Scalidophora (formerly Cephalorhyncha), the Nematoida form the clade Cycloneuralia, but much disagreement occurs both between and among the available morphological and molecular data. The Cycloneuralia or the Introverta—depending on the validity of the former—are often ranked as a superphylum.[29][30]

Systematics

[edit]

Due to the lack of knowledge regarding many nematodes, their systematics is contentious. An early and influential classification was proposed by Chitwood and Chitwood[31]—later revised by Chitwood[32]—who divided the phylum into two classes—Aphasmidia and Phasmidia. These were later renamed Adenophorea (gland bearers) and Secernentea (secretors), respectively.[33] The Secernentea share several characteristics, including the presence of phasmids, a pair of sensory organs located in the lateral posterior region, and this was used as the basis for this division. This scheme was adhered to in many later classifications, though the Adenophorea were not in a uniform group.

Initial studies of incomplete DNA sequences[34] suggested the existence of five clades:[35]

The Secernentea seem to be a natural group of close relatives, while the Adenophorea appear to be a paraphyletic assemblage of roundworms that retain a good number of ancestral traits. The old Enoplia do not seem to be monophyletic, either, but do contain two distinct lineages. The old group Chromadorea seems to be another paraphyletic assemblage, with the Monhysterida representing a very ancient minor group of nematodes. Among the Secernentea, the Diplogasteria may need to be united with the Rhabditia, while the Tylenchia might be paraphyletic with the Rhabditia.[36]

The understanding of roundworm systematics and phylogeny as of 2002 is summarised below:

Phylum Nematoda

Later work has suggested the presence of 12 clades.[37] In 2019, a study identified one conserved signature indel (CSI) found exclusively in members of the phylum Nematoda through comparative genetic analyses.[38] The CSI consists of a single amino acid insertion within a conserved region of a Na(+)/H(+) exchange regulatory factor protein NRFL-1 and is a molecular marker that distinguishes the phylum from other species.[38] An analysis of the mitochondrial DNA suggests that the following groupings are valid[39]

In 2022 a new classification of the entire phylum Nematoda was presented by M. Hodda. It was based on current molecular, developmental and morphological evidence.[40] Under this classification, the classes and subclasses are:

Fossil record

[edit]

Nematode eggs from the clades Ascaridina, Spirurina, and Trichocephalida have been discovered in coprolites from the Oligocene-aged Tremembé Formation, which represented a palaeolake in present-day São Paulo with a diverse fossil assemblage of birds, fish, and arthropods that lent itself to fostering high nematode diversity.[41] Nematodes have also been found in various lagerstätten, such as Burmese amber, the Moltrasio Formation, and the Rhynie chert, where the earliest known fossils are known from.

Anatomy

[edit]
Internal anatomy of a male C. elegans nematode
Cross-section of female Ascaris. The large circles filled with small green circles are the uterus and eggs. The long narrow feature is the digestive tract. The smaller red and orange circles are the ovaries and oviducts. The cluster of green and black blobs in the upper right and lower left are the nerve cords (ventral and dorsal). Surrounding the internal organs are the frilly green longitudinal muscles, the dark hypodermis, and the green outer cuticle.

Nematodes are very small, slender worms. Most are free-living, often less than 2.5 mm long and some only about 1 mm. Many nematodes are microscopic. Some soil nematodes can reach up to 7 mm in length, and some marine species can reach up to 5 cm. Some are parasitic and can reach lengths of 50 cm or more.[42]

The body is often ornamented with ridges, rings, bristles, or other distinctive structures.[43]

The head is relatively distinct. Whereas the rest of the body is bilaterally symmetrical, the head is radially symmetrical, with sensory bristles and, in many cases, solid 'head-shields' radiating outwards around the mouth. The mouth has either three or six lips, which often bear a series of teeth on their inner edges. An adhesive 'caudal gland' is often found at the tip of the tail.[44] The epidermis is either a syncytium or a single layer of cells, and is covered by a thick collagenous cuticle. The cuticle is often of a complex structure and may have two or three distinct layers. Underneath the epidermis lies a layer of longitudinal muscle cells. The relatively rigid cuticle works with the muscles to create a hydroskeleton, as nematodes lack circumferential muscles. Projections run from the inner surface of muscle cells towards the nerve cords; this is a unique arrangement in the animal kingdom, in which nerve cells normally extend fibers into the muscles rather than vice versa.[44]

Digestive system

[edit]

The oral cavity is lined with cuticles, which are often strengthened with structures, such as ridges, especially in carnivorous species, which may bear several teeth. The mouth often includes a sharp stylet, which the animal can thrust into its prey. In some species, the stylet is hollow and can be used to suck liquids from plants or animals.[44] The oral cavity opens into a muscular, sucking pharynx, also lined with cuticle. Digestive glands are found in this region of the gut, producing enzymes that start to break down the food. In stylet-bearing species, these may even be injected into the prey.[44]

No stomach is present, with the pharynx connecting directly to a muscleless intestine that forms the main length of the gut. This produces further enzymes and also absorbs nutrients through its single-cell-thick lining. The last portion of the intestine is lined by a cuticle, forming a rectum, which expels waste through the anus just below and in front of the tip of the tail. The movement of food through the digestive system is the result of the body movements of the worm. The intestine has valves or sphincters at either end to help control food movement through the body.[44]

Excretory system

[edit]

Nitrogenous waste is excreted in the form of ammonia through the body wall, and is not associated with any specific organs. However, the structures for excreting salt to maintain osmoregulation are typically more complex.[44]

There is an excretory gland, also known as a ventral cell, or renette cell in all species of Adenophorea. In Secernentia there is an excretory canal system that may or may not use a gland cell.[42]

Nervous system

[edit]
See also: Muscle arms

At the anterior end of the animal a dense, circular nerve ring which serves as the brain surrounds the pharynx.[44] From this ring six labial papillary nerve cords extend anteriorly, while six nerve cords; a large ventral, a smaller dorsal and two pairs of sublateral cords extend posteriorly.[45] Each nerve lies within a cord of connective tissue lying beneath the cuticle and between the muscle cells. The ventral nerve is the largest, and has a double structure forward of the excretory pore. The dorsal nerve is responsible for motor control, while the lateral nerves are sensory, and the ventral combines both functions.[44]

The nervous system is the only place in the body that contains cilia; these are all nonmotile and with a sensory function.[46][47]

The body is covered in numerous sensory bristles and papillae that together provide a sense of touch. Behind the sensory bristles on the head lie two small pits, or 'amphids'. These are well supplied with nerve cells and are probably chemoreception organs. A few aquatic nematodes possess what appear to be pigmented eye-spots, but whether or not these are actually sensory in nature is unclear.[44]

Reproduction

[edit]
Extremity of a male nematode showing the spicule, used for copulation, bar=100 μm[48]

Most nematode species are dioecious, with separate male and female individuals, though some, such as Caenorhabditis elegans, are androdioecious, consisting of hermaphrodites and rare males. Both sexes possess one or two tubular gonads. In males, the sperm are produced at the end of the gonad and migrate along its length as they mature. The testis opens into a relatively wide seminal vesicle and then during intercourse into a glandular and muscular ejaculatory duct associated with the vas deferens and cloaca. In females, the ovaries each open into an oviduct (in hermaphrodites, the eggs enter a spermatheca first) and then a glandular uterus. The uteri both open into a common vulva/vagina, usually located in the middle of the morphologically ventral surface.[44]

Reproduction is usually sexual, though hermaphrodites are capable of self-fertilization. Males are usually smaller than females or hermaphrodites (often much smaller) and often have a characteristically bent or fan-shaped tail. During copulation, one or more chitinized spicules move out of the cloaca and are inserted into the genital pore of the female. Amoeboid sperm crawl along the spicule into the female worm. Nematode sperm is thought to be the only eukaryotic cell without the globular protein G-actin.[49]

Eggs may be embryonated or unembryonated when passed by the female, meaning their fertilized eggs may not yet be developed. A few species are known to be ovoviviparous. The eggs are protected by an outer shell, secreted by the uterus. In free-living roundworms, the eggs hatch into larvae, which appear essentially identical to the adults, except for an underdeveloped reproductive system; in parasitic roundworms, the lifecycle is often much more complicated.[44] The structure of the eggshell is complicated and includes several layers; a detailed anatomical and terminological framework has been proposed for these layers in 2023.[50]

Nematodes as a whole possess a wide range of modes of reproduction.[51] Some nematodes, such as Heterorhabditis spp., undergo a process called endotokia matricida: intrauterine birth causing maternal death.[52] Some nematodes are hermaphroditic, and keep their self-fertilized eggs inside the uterus until they hatch. The juvenile nematodes then ingest the parent nematode. This process is significantly promoted in environments with a low food supply.[52]

The nematode model species C. elegans, C. briggsae, and Pristionchus pacificus, among other species, exhibit androdioecy,[53] which is otherwise very rare among animals. The single genus Meloidogyne (root-knot nematodes) exhibits a range of reproductive modes, including sexual reproduction, facultative sexuality (in which most, but not all, generations reproduce asexually), and both meiotic and mitotic parthenogenesis.[citation needed]

The genus Mesorhabditis exhibits an unusual form of parthenogenesis, in which sperm-producing males copulate with females, but the sperm do not fuse with the ovum. Contact with the sperm is essential for the ovum to begin dividing, but because no fusion of the cells occurs, the male contributes no genetic material to the offspring, which are essentially clones of the female.[44]

Aging

[edit]

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is often used as a model organism for studying aging at the molecular level. For example, in C. elegans aging negatively impacts DNA repair, and mutants of C. elegans that are long-lived were shown to have increased DNA repair capability.[54] These findings suggest a genetically determined correlation between DNA repair capacity and lifespan.[54] In female C. elegans, germline processes that control DNA repair and formation of chromosomal crossovers during meiosis were shown to progressively deteriorate with age.[55]

Free-living species

[edit]

Different free-living species feed on materials as varied as bacteria, algae, fungi, small animals, fecal matter, dead organisms, and living tissues. Free-living marine nematodes are important and abundant members of the meiobenthos. They play an important role in the decomposition process, aid in recycling of nutrients in marine environments, and are sensitive to changes in the environment caused by pollution. One roundworm of note, C. elegans, lives in the soil and has found much use as a model organism. C. elegans has had its entire genome sequenced,[56] the developmental fate of every cell determined, and every neuron mapped.[57]

Parasitic species

[edit]
Fecal parasitic (mostly) nematodes from stools of Old World monkeys

Nematodes that commonly parasitise humans include ascarids (Ascaris), filarias, hookworms, pinworms (Enterobius), and whipworms (Trichuris trichiura). The species Trichinella spiralis, commonly known as the trichina worm, occurs in rats, pigs, bears, and humans, and is responsible for the disease trichinosis. Baylisascaris usually infests wild animals, but can be deadly to humans, as well. Dirofilaria immitis is known for causing heartworm disease by inhabiting the hearts, arteries, and lungs of dogs and some cats. Haemonchus contortus is one of the most abundant infectious agents in sheep around the world, causing great economic damage to sheep. In contrast, entomopathogenic nematodes parasitize insects and are mostly considered beneficial by humans, but some attack beneficial insects.[citation needed]

One form of nematode is entirely dependent upon fig wasps, which are the sole source of fig fertilization. They prey upon the wasps, riding them from the ripe fig of the wasp's birth to the fig flower of its death, where they kill the wasp, and their offspring await the birth of the next generation of wasps as the fig ripens.[citation needed]

Colorized electron micrograph of soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) and egg

A parasitic tetradonematid nematode discovered in 2005, Myrmeconema neotropicum, induces fruit mimicry in the tropical ant Cephalotes atratus. Infected ants develop bright red gasters (abdomens), tend to be more sluggish, and walk with their gasters in a conspicuous elevated position. These changes likely cause frugivorous birds to confuse the infected ants for berries, and eat them. Parasite eggs passed in the bird's feces are subsequently collected by foraging C. atratus and are fed to their larvae, thus completing the lifecycle of M. neotropicum.[58]

Similarly, multiple varieties of nematodes have been found in the abdominal cavities of the primitively social sweat bee, Lasioglossum zephyrus. Inside the female body, the nematode hinders ovarian development and renders the bee less active, thus less effective in pollen collection.[59]

Agriculture and horticulture

[edit]

Depending on its species, a nematode may be beneficial or detrimental to plant health. From agricultural and horticulture perspectives, the two categories of nematodes are the predatory ones, which kill garden pests; and the pest nematodes, which attack plants, or act as vectors spreading plant viruses between crop plants.[60] Predatory nematodes include Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita which is a lethal parasite of gastropods such as slugs and snails.[61] Some members of the genus Steinernema such as Steinernema carpocapsae and Steinernema riobrave are generalist parasites of webworms, cutworms, armyworms, girdlers, some weevils, wood-borers and corn earworm moths.[62] These organisms are grown commercially as biological pest control agents which can be used as an alternative to pesticides; their use is considered very safe.[63] Plant-parasitic nematodes include several groups causing severe crop losses, taking 10% of crops worldwide every year.[64] The most common genera are Aphelenchoides (foliar nematodes), Ditylenchus, Globodera (potato cyst nematodes), Heterodera (soybean cyst nematodes), Longidorus, Meloidogyne (root-knot nematodes), Nacobbus, Pratylenchus (lesion nematodes), Trichodorus, and Xiphinema (dagger nematodes). Several phytoparasitic nematode species cause histological damages to roots, including the formation of visible galls (e.g. by root-knot nematodes), which are useful characters for their diagnostic in the field. Some nematode species transmit plant viruses through their feeding activity on roots. One of them is Xiphinema index, vector of grapevine fanleaf virus, an important disease of grapes, another one is Xiphinema diversicaudatum, vector of arabis mosaic virus. Other nematodes attack bark and forest trees. The most important representative of this group is Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, the pine wood nematode, present in Asia and America and recently discovered in Europe. This nematode is transmitted from tree to tree by sawyer beetles (Monochamus).[65]

Greenhouse growers use entomopathogenic nematodes as beneficial agents to control fungus gnats. The nematodes enter the larvae of the gnats by way of their anus, mouth, and spiracles (breathing pores) and then release bacteria which kills the gnat larvae. Commonly used nematode species to control pests on greenhouse crops include Steinernema feltiae for fungus gnats and western flower thrips, Steinernema carpocapsae used to control shore flies, Steinernema kraussei for control of black vine weevils, and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora to control beetle larvae.[66]

Rotations of plants with nematode-resistant species or varieties is one means of managing parasitic nematode infestations. For example, planting Tagetes marigolds as a cover crop just prior to planting a nematode-susceptible plant, has been shown to suppress nematodes.[67] Another approach involves using natural antagonists, particularly bacteria and fungi, which have proven effective in suppressing plant-parasitic nematodes,[68] such as the fungus Gliocladium roseum. Chitosan, a natural biocontrol, elicits plant defense responses to destroy parasitic cyst nematodes on roots of soybean, corn, sugar beet, potato, and tomato crops without harming beneficial nematodes in the soil.[69] Soil steaming is an efficient method to kill nematodes before planting a crop, but indiscriminately eliminates both harmful and beneficial soil fauna.

The golden nematode Globodera rostochiensis is a particularly harmful pest that has resulted in quarantines and crop failures worldwide. It can be controlled, however. CSIRO, the scientific research body of the Australian government, found a 13- to 14-fold reduction of nematode population densities in plots having Chinese mustard Brassica juncea green manure or seed meal in the soil.[70]

Disease in humans

[edit]
Disability-adjusted life year for intestinal nematode infections per 100,000 in 2002.
    <  25
  25–50
  50–75
  75–100
  100–120
  120–140
  140–160
  160–180
  180–200
  200–220
  220–240
    >  240
  no data
Anthelmintic effect of papain on Heligmosomoides bakeri

A number of pathogenic intestinal nematodes cause diseases in humans, including ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm disease. Anisakis species parasitise fish and marine mammals and when consumed by humans can cause anisakiasis, a gastric or gastroallergic disease.[71] Gastrointestinal nematode infections in humans are common, with approximately 50% of the global population being affected. Developing countries are most heavily impacted, in part due to lack of access to medical care.[72]

Trichinosis starts in the intestines but larvae can migrate to muscle. Filarial nematodes cause filariases.

Toxocariasis is a zoonotic infection caused by roundworms passed from dogs, and sometimes cats. It can give rise to different types of larva migrans, such as visceral larva migrans and ocular larva migrans.

Studies have shown that parasitic nematodes infect American eels, causing damage to the eel's swim bladder,[73] dairy animals like cattle and buffalo,[74] and all species of sheep.[75]

Soil ecosystems

[edit]
Further information: Soil ecology

About 90% of nematodes reside in the top 15 cm (6") of soil. Nematodes do not decompose organic matter, but, instead, are parasitic and free-living organisms that feed on living material. Nematodes can effectively regulate bacterial population and community composition—they may eat up to 5,000 bacteria per minute. Also, nematodes can play an important role in the nitrogen cycle by way of nitrogen mineralization.[76] But plant parasitic nematodes cause billions of dollars in annual crop damage worldwide.[77]

One group of carnivorous fungi, the nematophagous fungi, are predators of soil nematodes.[78] They can set enticements for the nematodes in the form of lassos or adhesive structures.[79][80][81] They can also release powerful toxins when in contact with nematodes.[82]

Survivability

[edit]
See also: List of longest-living organisms § Revived into activity after stasis

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans an important model organism, was used as part of an ongoing research project conducted on the 2003 Space Shuttle Columbia mission STS-107, and survived the re-entry breakup. It is believed to be the first known species to survive a virtually unprotected atmospheric descent to Earth's surface.[83][84] The Antarctic nematode Panagrolaimus davidi was able to withstand intracellular freezing depending on how well it had been fed.[85] In 2023 an individual of Panagrolaimus kolymaensis was revived after 46,000 years in Siberian permafrost.[86]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Nematode

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Nematodes, commonly known as roundworms, comprise the Nematoda, a group of unsegmented, bilaterally symmetrical with elongated, cylindrical bodies enveloped in a flexible and featuring a pseudocoelomate . These organisms lack appendages, cilia, and specialized respiratory or circulatory systems, relying instead on a complete digestive tract for processing and through their . Nematodes are ubiquitous, inhabiting marine sediments, freshwater systems, terrestrial soils, and even extreme environments, with densities reaching up to 20 million individuals per square meter in soils and comprising an estimated 4.4 × 10^{20} nematodes in topsoil worldwide—equivalent to 60 billion per human. Over 27,000 species have been described, though estimates suggest up to one million exist, with the majority free-living and the remainder parasitic on , , vertebrates, or humans; four out of every five multicellular animals on are nematodes. Free-living species contribute to ecosystem stability by microorganisms, facilitating mineralization and organic matter , while parasitic forms inflict substantial economic losses in agriculture and health burdens through diseases like and infections. The soil-dwelling Caenorhabditis elegans stands out as a foundational in , , and neurobiology, owing to its transparent body, invariant , hermaphroditic , and fully sequenced , enabling detailed studies of aging, , and gene function conserved across eukaryotes.

Etymology

Derivation and historical usage

The term "nematode" originates from the Modern Latin Nematoda, formed as a compound of the nêma (νῆμα), meaning "thread," and -ōdēs (-ωδής), denoting "like" or "resembling," which captures the elongated, thread-like morphology of these organisms as observed under early microscopes. This etymology emphasizes their slender, unsegmented body form, distinguishing them visually from broader or flattened worm taxa. The scientific grouping Nematoidea was first proposed by German parasitologist Karl Asmus Rudolphi in his 1808 work Entozoorum synopsis cui accedunt species noviter detectae et descriptae, where he classified thread-like internal parasites separately from flatworms (Platyhelminthes), based on their cylindrical pseudocoelomate structure versus the acoelomate, dorsoventrally flattened form of the latter. Rudolphi's reflected empirical observations of dissected specimens, prioritizing morphological distinctions over prior vague categorizations in . By 1861, Karl Moriz Diesing formalized Nematoda as a higher , solidifying its adoption in systematic biology. Common names such as "roundworms" emerged in English around the mid-19th century, directly tied to the nematodes' circular cross-section and lack of segmentation, which contrasts with the ringed annelids and provides a first-principles basis for differentiation rooted in rather than molecular traits. This terminology gained traction in texts by the 1860s, as revealed the enabling their turgid, rounded profile under pressure.

Taxonomy and Systematics

Historical classification efforts

In 1808, Karl Asmund Rudolphi defined the group Nematoidea for elongate, unsegmented worms, separating them from annelids on the basis of their lack of body segmentation and distinct internal anatomy. This early effort emphasized observable morphological differences, such as the continuous cylindrical body and , though empirical challenges arose from the group's superficial simplicity and variability in parasitic versus free-living forms. By the early 20th century, Nathan A. Cobb elevated nematodes to phylum rank as Nematoda (initially proposed as Nemates in 1919, with a formal diagnosis in 1932), underscoring their unjointed, thread-like structure and pseudocoel as unifying traits distinct from other worm phyla. In 1937, Benjamin G. Chitwood advanced classification by dividing the phylum into two classes—Aphasmidia (lacking phasmids, or caudal chemosensory organs) and Phasmidia (possessing phasmids)—relying on microscopic examination of sensory structures and esophageal morphology to address ambiguities in earlier groupings. Mid-20th-century refinements focused on finer traits like buccal cavity configuration and reproductive anatomy; for instance, in 1949, Gerald Thorne established the order Tylenchida for -parasitic nematodes, using the presence of a hollow stylet in the mouthparts for piercing plant tissues and details of female gonoducts as diagnostic. Similar criteria delineated orders such as for bacteriovorous and insect-associated species, where esophageal gland arrangements and spicule morphology in males provided resolution amid challenges from convergent adaptations in habitat-specific forms like parasites. Morphological approaches faced persistent hurdles, including homoplasy in traits like body elongation and composition across diverse ecologies, prompting integration of molecular data by the 1990s. Phylogenetic analyses of 18S sequences, notably by Aguinaldo et al. in 1997, demonstrated nematodes' affinity to ecdysozoans (molting animals including arthropods) rather than annelids, leveraging sequence divergence to overcome limitations of visible and confirm causal links via shared genetic markers of molting. This shift validated empirical inconsistencies in prior schemes, such as debated placements based solely on superficial worm-like resemblances.

Phylogenetic position and debates

Nematodes are classified within the clade, a grouping of animals characterized by the molting of a chitinous , which unites them with arthropods, tardigrades, onychophorans, and other lineages. This placement is morphologically supported by shared features such as (molting) and aspects of , including nerve cord organization. Molecular evidence from 18S rRNA gene sequencing, first robustly analyzed in 1997, provided phylogenetic support for by demonstrating closer affinity between nematodes and arthropods than to lophotrochozoans like annelids or mollusks. Subsequent genome-scale studies using concatenated protein sequences have further corroborated this topology, with maximum likelihood analyses yielding high bootstrap support for nematodes as part of . Debates persist regarding the precise internal structure of and the of Nematoda itself, particularly in relation to (horsehair worms), which some early morphological analyses suggested might nest within nematodes due to superficial vermiform similarities. However, combined molecular and morphological datasets affirm the of both Nematoda and as distinct taxa, with exhibiting a more complete set of ancestral —retaining up to nine paralog groups—contrasting with the reduced Hox complement (typically four to five genes) in nematodes, indicative of independent evolutionary trajectories post-divergence. Hox cluster organization differences, analyzed via , further argue against , as nematode show lineage-specific losses and rearrangements not mirrored in . Phylogenomic approaches in the 2020s, incorporating transcriptomes and genomes from dozens of nematode with hundreds to thousands of orthologous genes, have solidified nematodes' basal position within while exposing conflicts in resolving deeper divergences. For instance, analyses of 60 newly sequenced nematode genomes across eight orders produced a robust tree under maximum likelihood, placing Enoplia as the earliest diverging class, but site-heterogeneous models revealed long-branch attraction artifacts that complicate basal relationships. These studies question models of rapid radiation during the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition (circa 550-500 million years ago), as elevated evolutionary rates in early nematode lineages may inflate perceived bushiness, with fossil-calibrated timetrees suggesting more gradual diversification preceded by stem-group ecdysozoans. Despite such advances, ongoing debates highlight the need for denser sampling and mitigation of compositional heterogeneity to refine the ecdysozoan backbone.

Current classification and species diversity

The phylum Nematoda is presently divided into two principal clades, and , reflecting phylogenetic analyses integrating molecular sequences, developmental patterns, and morphological traits such as nerve ring position and phasmid presence. predominantly comprises free-living marine and freshwater forms with varied feeding apparatuses, while encompasses a broader array including terrestrial and parasitic lineages, with (now subsumed within it) featuring phasmids and often rhabditiform larvae. Taxonomic keys for distinguishing orders and families emphasize cephalic sensilla like amphids—pocket- or spiral-shaped chemosensory organs—and (buccal cavity) armature, which varies from unarmed to heavily sclerotized with teeth or odontia. More than 28,000 nematode have been formally described across approximately 2,300 genera and 260 families, though this represents a fraction of total diversity given the phylum's ubiquity in sediments, , and hosts. Empirical extrapolations from soil core sampling indicate global populations exceeding 4.4 × 10^{20} individuals in alone, equivalent to roughly 60 billion per , with around 0.3 gigatonnes carbon; deeper extrapolations to and subsoils suggest totals in the 10^{20} to 10^{22} range. Metagenomic approaches, including environmental DNA sequencing from marine sediments, have accelerated discoveries by bypassing morphological biases in traditional surveys, revealing cryptic diversity and enabling descriptions of novel taxa; for instance, three free-living of the desmodorid Molgolaimus were delineated in 2025 from South Atlantic shelf samples using integrated morphological and molecular data. Such methods underscore underrepresentation in described , with benthic marine assemblages showing extraordinarily high operational taxonomic units far exceeding prior counts.

Evolutionary History

Fossil record and earliest evidence

The fossil record of nematodes is exceptionally sparse, primarily due to their small size, soft bodies, and lack of mineralized structures, which rarely permit preservation as body fossils outside of exceptional conditions like cherts or . Trace fossils, such as tubular burrows potentially attributable to nematodes, have been proposed from Early (~470 Ma) marine deposits in , but these remain controversial and are often interpreted as pseudofossils or traces of other worm-like organisms rather than definitive evidence. The earliest confirmed nematode body fossils date to the in (~396 Ma), where specimens of Palaeonema phyticum were discovered within the stomatal chambers of the rhyniophyte plant Aglaophyton major. These minute worms (0.1–1 mm long) exhibit characteristic nematode traits, including a cylindrical body and possible cuticular annulations, and are interpreted as primitive of early land plants, marking the onset of plant-nematode interactions. This discovery provides direct evidence of nematodes in terrestrial ecosystems contemporaneous with the colonization of land by vascular plants. More abundant and morphologically detailed fossils appear in mid-Cretaceous (~99 Ma) amber from Kachin, , preserving intact nematodes such as mermithids associated with hosts. These inclusions reveal modern-like features, including annulated cuticles and elongated bodies, indicating ecological roles like by this time, though the record remains patchy with few intermediates due to preservational biases. Molecular clock estimates, calibrated using ecdysozoan fossils including co-occurrences and nematodes, place the initial divergence of nematodes (Nematoda) within the period (~587–543 Ma), predating the oldest traces by over 100 million years and aligning with the broader radiation of bilaterian animals. This deep origin underscores the limitations of the fossil record for soft-bodied clades, where exceptional Lagerstätten provide snapshots rather than continuous history.

Origins and major diversification events

estimates derived from multi-gene analyses place the origin of the Nematoda in the , exceeding 543 million years ago (Ma), with the divergence of the three major extant classes (Enoplia, Dorylaimia, and ) occurring soon after in the or early periods. These early splits reflect basal ecdysozoan radiation, predating the fossil record, as supported by phylogenomic reconstructions incorporating 60 nematode genomes across eight orders. The (approximately 538-520 Ma) marked a key diversification phase for nematodes, correlating with global oxygenation events that elevated marine oxygen levels and enabled expanded metazoan metabolic demands, thereby promoting ecological complexity and niche partitioning among early bilaterians. Low-oxygen constraints prior to this period likely limited active, sediment-burrowing lifestyles, but post-Cambrian oxygen spikes facilitated nematode proliferation in benthic environments, as inferred from comparative dating of animal phyla divergences around 993 Ma for arthropod-nematode splits adjusted to Cambrian pulses. Mesozoic diversification (252-66 Ma) featured pronounced radiation of parasitic lineages, driven by host expansions including Cretaceous angiosperm proliferation (circa 140-66 Ma) and vertebrate radiations, with nematode fossils indicating invertebrate parasites emerging in the Early Cretaceous. Plant-parasitic forms, such as precursors to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.), exhibit co-evolutionary signatures with angiosperm hosts through genomic expansions, including effector gene families enabling root galling and nutrient uptake. Vertebrate-associated parasites similarly track Mesozoic host diversification, with amber-preserved evidence of mermithid infections in insects underscoring trophic linkages. Genomic analyses of parasitic nematodes reveal extensive gene duplications and lateral transfers promoting host invasion, with effector protein expansions dated phylogenetically to 100-200 Ma in clades like feeders, coinciding with Jurassic-Cretaceous ecological shifts. In the (2.6 Ma-present), anthropogenic has selectively amplified lineages with broad host ranges and high reproductive rates, such as and root-knot nematodes in annual crops, via disturbed soil habitats favoring rapid adaptation over specialized free-living forms.

Morphology and Anatomy

External features and cuticle

Nematodes exhibit an elongated, unsegmented, cylindrical that tapers gradually at both anterior and posterior ends, conferring bilateral and a pseudocoelomate optimized for flexibility and burrowing through substrates. This body form ranges in length from approximately 0.2 mm in minute free-living species to over 9 m in certain parasitic forms inhabiting tissues, with diameters typically under 1 mm even in larger specimens. The external surface lacks true segmentation, though some taxa display annular ridges or cuticular thickenings that aid in anchorage or sensory function without implying internal division. The consists of a tough, acellular secreted by the underlying hypodermis, comprising multiple layers including an outer epicuticle, cortical zone, medial region with fibrous elements, and , predominantly composed of crosslinked -like proteins rather than . This multilayered structure, averaging 0.5 μm thick in model species like , provides mechanical resistance to environmental stresses, osmotic regulation, and a barrier against pathogens, while its elasticity supports body elongation during movement. The undergoes periodic renewal through , with nematodes molting four times across juvenile stages (J1 to J4) to accommodate growth, involving apolysis where the old detaches followed by secretion of a new one beneath it. This process relies on hypodermal synthesis of precursors, enabling adaptation to varying habitats without disrupting the formed by internal fluid pressure against the rigid yet flexible . Locomotion derives from this hydrostatic framework, where longitudinal muscle contractions propagate sinusoidal waves along the body, countered by cuticular incompressibility to generate , as observed in of undulatory propulsion in or aqueous media. External sensory apparatuses, notably paired amphids at the anterior extremity, function as chemosensory organs with ciliated neuron dendrites opening via cuticular pores, their morphology—ranging from simple pores in free-living clades to elaborate spirals or pockets in parasites—correlating empirically with demands such as host detection or substrate . These structures, innervated by 10-12 neurons per amphid, facilitate responses verified through behavioral assays linking amphidial integrity to survival in specific ecological niches.

Internal organ systems

The digestive system of nematodes forms a complete tubular tract from mouth to , comprising a triradial , intestine, and . The , a muscular pump, draws in food via radial muscle contractions and grinds it before passage to the intestine; in Caenorhabditis elegans, it consists of 34 muscle cells, 9 marginal cells, 9 epithelial cells, 5 gland cells, and 20 neurons specialized for ingestion. Nematodes lack a , relying instead on pseudocoelomic fluid for hydrostatic pressure that supports gut function and body shape. The handles and waste removal through ular or tubular structures, varying by species. In C. elegans, it includes a pair of fused anterior cells, an elongated canal cell forming excretory tubes, a duct cell, and a pore cell that secretes fluid to maintain internal osmotic balance. The centers on a circumpharyngeal nerve ring surrounding the , from which extend four main longitudinal cords: one dorsal, one ventral, and two lateral, facilitating sensory integration and along the body. The ventral cord predominates in coordinating locomotion and reflexes. Reproductive organs typically comprise paired tubular gonads extending as reflexed arms, producing vast quantities; parasitic species like females generate up to 200,000 eggs daily from oocytes formed in the ovaries. Nematodes possess no specialized respiratory organs, with oxygen diffusing directly across the thin body wall into tissues.

Reproduction and Development

Modes of reproduction

Most nematode species exhibit , with distinct male and female individuals, where males are typically smaller than females and possess copulatory spicules for mating. This facilitates , with sperm transferred via the spicules into the female's reproductive tract. Hermaphroditism occurs in certain species, notably , where self-fertilizing produce both oocytes and limited sperm, enabling internal self-fertilization as the primary reproductive mode. Males, arising rarely at about 0.1-0.2% frequency due to X-chromosome during , allow for when present. , an asexual mode producing female offspring from unfertilized eggs, is prevalent in some free-living nematodes, such as species in the genus Panagrolaimus, which can be diploid or triploid and often display mitotic or meiotic variants. This strategy enhances reproductive output in environments with low mate availability. Reproductive output varies between and , particularly in parasitic species; many lay eggs (oviparous), while others retain eggs until larvae hatch internally (ovoviviparous, e.g., hookworms) or give live birth (viviparous, e.g., ). These modes influence transmission efficiency in host-parasite dynamics.

Life cycle stages

Nematodes exhibit a stereotypical life cycle comprising an egg stage, four successive juvenile stages designated J1 through J4, and the adult stage, with each juvenile-to-juvenile or juvenile-to-adult transition marked by of the . The J1 stage typically develops within the , followed by hatching as J2, after which molts occur externally to yield J3, J4, and finally adults. In free-living species such as Caenorhabditis elegans, progression through these stages from egg to reproductive adult requires approximately 3 days at 20°C under conditions, enabling rapid generational turnover in controlled cultures. Parasitic nematodes often extend these timelines, with full cycles spanning weeks to months depending on host availability and environmental factors, as observed in lab-reared populations where juveniles feed and grow more slowly post-infection. Specialized infective stages facilitate host invasion; for instance, hookworms produce ensheathed third-stage larvae (L3, equivalent to a modified J3) that enter developmental arrest with minimal metabolism, persisting in soil or water to penetrate mammalian skin or mucosa. Similarly, in root-knot nematodes like Meloidogyne incognita, the J2 juveniles hatch from eggs as the primary infective form, actively migrating through soil to breach plant root cortices before further molting internally. Molting and stage transitions respond to extrinsic signals, including temperature thresholds that accelerate or inhibit development—such as optimal ranges of 15–25°C for C. elegans progression—and chemical cues like ascarosides, which are pheromones modulating larval dispersal forms in dense populations. In M. incognita, empirical studies map J2 hatching and infectivity to soil temperatures exceeding 18°C, with transitions to later juveniles triggered post-root penetration by host-derived stimuli. These cues ensure synchrony with favorable conditions, as verified through timed incubations in or soil assays.

Physiology and Adaptations

Aging mechanisms in key species

is the principal model species for dissecting nematode aging mechanisms, exhibiting a wild-type adult lifespan of 12-18 days at 20°C under conditions. Senescence involves progressive accumulation of oxidative damage to proteins and , measurable via assays like protein , which correlates with declining physiological function. The insulin/IGF-1-like signaling (IIS) pathway critically regulates lifespan, with loss-of-function mutations in the daf-2 receptor gene extending mean lifespan approximately twofold, up to 2-3 times in certain alleles or combinations, through activation of the FOXO homolog daf-16. This extension stems from enhanced resistance to oxidative and thermal stresses rather than mere metabolic slowdown, involving upregulated defenses and altered . Germline ablation, via laser microsurgery or glp-1 mutations disrupting stem cells, independently prolongs lifespan by 50-100%, signaling from the to soma via mediators and regulation to suppress damage accumulation. These interventions highlight reproductive trade-offs in aging, where reduced proliferation redirects resources toward somatic maintenance without halting entirely. Aging proceeds telomere-independently in C. elegans, as genetic manipulations altering lifespan do not affect telomere maintenance, underscoring distinct pathways from models. In extremophile species like the Panagrolaimus davidi, cryoprotectants such as facilitate intracellular freezing survival and anhydrobiosis, enabling multi-year , but active lifespan remains short (1-2 months), with no verified despite environmental adaptations.

Survivability in extreme environments

Certain nematode species demonstrate exceptional tolerance to through anhydrobiosis, a reversible ametabolic state induced by gradual water loss, during which they accumulate protectants like to preserve biomolecular integrity. In the nematode Panagrolaimus davidi, desiccation triggers upregulation of genes involved in , enabling cellular stabilization and survival in water contents below 5%, with revival upon rehydration occurring successfully even after prolonged dry periods exceeding months in laboratory simulations of extreme aridity. Similarly, species such as Plectus antarcticus in Antarctic dry valley soils employ this strategy, correlating levels with post-desiccation recovery rates above 50% following exposure to relative humidities near 0%. Nematodes also exhibit resilience to ionizing radiation via efficient DNA double-strand break repair pathways, as evidenced by wild populations in the . Isolates collected from sites with radiation doses up to 18,000 μGy/h in 2023 showed no elevated germline mutation rates or reproductive declines compared to low-radiation controls, indicating baseline repair mechanisms—such as —suffice for chronic exposure without genomic deterioration. Laboratory assays confirm certain free-living forms, like , withstand acute doses up to 1,000 Gy with partial survival, attributed to upregulated repair genes rather than specialized resistance evolved . Thermal survivability spans extremes from at -80°C to short-term exposure above 40°C, supported by heat-shock proteins (HSPs) that chaperone misfolded proteins and mitigate . In C. elegans, HSP induction via preconditioning at 30–35°C enhances viability at 46°C for up to 100 minutes, with survival rates increasing from near-zero to over 20% through refolding of denatured enzymes. Freezing tolerance in Arctic species like Udonchus pallikuukensis reaches -15°C or lower, with slow pretreatment boosting recovery by activating cryoprotectants and stabilizers, validated in experiments maintaining post-thaw. These adaptations, quantified in controlled exposures, underscore nematodes' capacity for transient endurance rather than indefinite persistence in uninhabitable conditions.

Ecological Roles

Free-living species and habitats

Free-living nematodes, comprising the majority of nematode species, inhabit terrestrial soils, freshwater sediments, and marine environments, where they function primarily as microbivores or predators rather than parasites. In soil habitats, field sampling consistently reveals bacterivorous species from the family Rhabditidae, such as genera Rhabditis and Panagrolaimus, as the most abundant trophic group, often accounting for over 50% of extracted individuals in upper soil layers across diverse ecosystems. These nematodes thrive in organic-rich microhabitats like decaying plant matter and rhizospheres, with population densities from field extractions reaching 2 to 20 million individuals per square meter in the topsoil. Bacterivores in the Rhabditidae family dominate nematode assemblages due to their rapid reproduction and opportunistic feeding on bacterial biofilms, as documented in long-term monitoring of agricultural and natural soils where they constitute up to 89% of developmental stages in certain samples. Their grazing activity targets dense bacterial colonies, with chemosensory adaptations enabling precise navigation via to nutrient gradients in patchy distributions. In oligotrophic patches with low organic input, such persist at lower but stable densities, relying on enhanced efficiency to exploit sparse microbial resources without requiring host dependence. Predatory free-living nematodes, notably from the order Mononchida (e.g., family Mononchidae), occupy higher trophic levels in soil food webs, preying on smaller nematodes, , and tardigrades as evidenced by gut content analyses and stable isotope studies from field-collected samples. These , often comprising 10-20% of nematodes in predator-enriched soils like forest litter, exhibit robust feeding apparatuses such as hollow stylets for piercing prey, structuring lower trophic communities through selective predation observed in temporal abundance surveys. In low-nutrient habitats, their chemotactic responses to prey exudates facilitate active hunting, sustaining populations amid resource scarcity.

Contributions to soil and aquatic ecosystems

Nematodes, particularly bacterivorous and fungivorous , play a pivotal role in nutrient cycling by grazing on microbial populations, which stimulates bacterial and fungal activity and promotes the mineralization of into plant-available forms such as . experiments demonstrate that bacterivorous nematodes enhance ammonification rates in acidic soils, increasing availability through the release of microbial following grazing-induced microbial turnover. Stable isotope tracing studies further confirm that nematodes facilitate carbon and from organic substrates to higher trophic levels, with nematode presence boosting net availability by up to 25% compared to nematode-free controls. In soil food webs, predatory nematodes exert top-down control via trophic cascades, reducing by bacterivores and fungivores on microbial decomposers, thereby sustaining rates and microbial biomass necessary for long-term breakdown. This regulation helps maintain by preventing depletion of basal resources, as evidenced by shifts in community structure where predator abundance correlates with balanced prey populations. Nematode community attributes, including maturity index, enrichment index, and structural index, serve as integrative indicators of , reflecting trophic balance and disturbance levels in diverse cropping systems. In aquatic ecosystems, nematodes dominate freshwater benthic communities, where they process by associated and facilitating mechanical breakdown, excreting bioavailable nutrients that enhance microbial of organic inputs. In marine sediments, nematodes comprise over 90% of metazoan meiofauna by abundance, driving sediment turnover through burrowing and bioturbation, which oxygenates s and accelerates organic matter remineralization. Mesocosm studies using ¹³C-labeled diatoms added to sediment cores show nematodes rapidly incorporate fresh organic carbon, confirming their causal role in carbon processing and flux within benthic food webs.

Parasitic Interactions

Plant-parasitic nematodes

Plant-parasitic nematodes establish pathogenic interactions with host roots primarily through endoparasitic mechanisms, penetrating tissues and manipulating cellular processes to create specialized feeding sites. Sedentary endoparasites, such as root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) and cyst nematodes (Heterodera spp.), select vascular parenchyma cells and inject effector proteins via their stylets to reprogram host gene expression, suppressing defenses and inducing hypertrophy. These effectors, secreted from esophageal glands, facilitate cell wall modifications and metabolic shifts, enabling sustained nutrient extraction. In contrast, migratory endoparasites like lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) traverse root tissues intracellularly without forming permanent sites, causing necrotic lesions through enzymatic degradation and mechanical damage. Root-knot nematodes initiate when infective second-stage juveniles (J2) enter root elongation zones, migrating intercellularly to the vascular cylinder before sedentarizing. There, effectors trigger the selected cells to undergo repeated acytokinetic mitoses and , yielding multinucleate giant cells characterized by dense cytoplasm, extensive , and numerous nuclei—up to 100 per cell in histological sections. These giant cells proliferate phloem-like connections, acting as metabolic sinks that divert substantial host resources, while surrounding tissues swell to form visible that histologically disrupt continuity and impede vascular flow. Meloidogyne spp. exhibit broad host compatibility, parasitizing over 2,000 species across dicots and some monocots. Cyst nematodes employ a distinct migratory-intracellular entry, with J2 dissolving cell walls using enzymes before inducing syncytia through targeted perforation and fusion of adjacent protoplasts, evidenced by histological observations of incomplete cell walls and incorporated nuclei. Syncytia expand via hypertrophy and further incorporations, featuring thickened walls, high metabolic activity, and vascular reconnection to sustain nematode feeding for weeks. These sites function as nutrient conduits, channeling photosynthates and solutes to the embedded nematode. Post-reproduction, females form durable cysts—hardened cuticles enclosing hundreds of eggs viable for years in soil, resisting desiccation and predators.

Animal and human parasites

Nematodes include numerous species that parasitize vertebrates, with infections ranging from intestinal to tissue-dwelling forms in both endemic and zoonotic contexts. Human infections often involve soil-transmitted helminths like of the genus , including A. duodenale and A. ceylanicum, alongside , which penetrate skin and migrate to the intestines. Global prevalence estimates indicate approximately 470 million cases, concentrated in tropical and subtropical regions of developing countries. Filarial nematodes, such as , establish chronic infections in lymphatic tissues after mosquito-vectored transmission of larvae, accounting for about 90% of cases worldwide. This species affects over 120 million people across 72 endemic countries in , , and the Western Pacific. In domestic animals, related filarial worms like infect canine hosts via bites, with larvae developing into adults in pulmonary arteries and right ventricle; veterinary surveys report prevalence rates of 13% in parts of and up to 27% in high-risk European populations. Tissue-migrating nematodes, exemplified by , encyst as larvae in striated muscles of intermediate hosts such as pigs and wildlife, enabling zoonotic transmission to humans and carnivorous animals through ingestion of raw or undercooked . Prevalence in pigs has declined due to regulated husbandry and inspection, but sporadic outbreaks occur from non-commercial sources like hunted or bears. Other zoonotic nematodes, such as those in the genus , infect marine mammals and fish, with accidental acquisition via undercooked leading to larval migration in gastrointestinal tissues. In and companion animals, gastrointestinal parasites like ascarids ( in pigs) and strongylids maintain high endemicity, often detected through fecal exams in veterinary practice. These interactions highlight nematodes' adaptation for host-specific or cross-species , sustained by environmental reservoirs and transmission vectors.

Agricultural Impacts

Economic damages from pests

Plant-parasitic nematodes inflict substantial global crop losses, estimated at 10-14% of annual yields for major crops, equating to $80-157 billion in economic damages depending on valuation methods that account for both direct yield reductions and indirect effects. These figures often underestimate true impacts, as nematode-induced symptoms—such as and —mimic abiotic stresses like or deficiency, leading to underdiagnosis in field yield reports and surveys that prioritize visible foliar diseases over root-level damage. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.), for instance, cause 30-37% yield reductions in tomatoes under moderate to high infestation levels, with disrupting vascular function and uptake. In the , nematodes contribute to annual losses exceeding $1.5 billion in corn and production alone, with soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) accounting for over $1 billion in damages through suppressed pod set and plant vigor. Corn yields face similar threats from species like Pratylenchus and Meloidogyne, resulting in 58.3 million reductions across the and in 2023, often manifesting as 5-15% declines in infested fields where root lesions impair water and nutrient absorption. from controlled trials demonstrates these losses through yield recoveries post-nematode exclusion, highlighting how undetected populations exacerbate damage. Nematode effects persist across seasons due to dormant stages like cysts and eggs surviving in for years, sustaining yield suppression even after initial infestations decline. Compromised from feeding also heighten vulnerability to secondary bacterial and fungal pathogens, amplifying losses beyond direct —effects frequently unquantified in standard economic assessments that isolate pest-specific impacts. This long-term legacy underscores the challenges in attributing full causal damage, as multi-year field data reveal compounding reductions not captured in single-season yield tallies.

Beneficial roles in biocontrol

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), primarily from the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis, serve as biological control agents against insect pests by actively seeking and infecting hosts in soil environments. Infective juveniles (IJs) penetrate insects through natural openings such as the mouth, anus, or spiracles, then regurgitate symbiotic bacteria—Xenorhabdus species for Steinernema and Photorhabdus for Heterorhabditis—which multiply in the host's hemolymph, inducing septicemia and toxin production that typically kills the insect within 24 to 48 hours. This mechanism enables EPNs to target a broad spectrum of soil-dwelling pests across multiple insect orders, including Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera, though laboratory virulence often exceeds field performance due to environmental constraints like soil texture and temperature. In agricultural applications, EPNs have demonstrated in turfgrass and grain crops, achieving 50-90% under optimal conditions such as adequate levels around 10-15%. For instance, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and Steinernema feltiae reduce white grub populations in turf, with field trials showing up to 62% decrease in plant lodging from corn rootworm larvae when applied with sufficient . However, varies significantly in practice; dry soils limit nematode and host invasion, often resulting in only 14-54% damage reduction compared to near-100% mortality in controlled lab settings, highlighting the gap between hype-driven lab results and real-world causal factors like and UV exposure post-application. Commercial adoption reflects growing interest despite these limitations, with the beneficial nematodes market valued at approximately $500 million in 2024 and projected to expand due to demand for sustainable pest management alternatives. Recent formulations from 2023 onward, including capsules and enhancements, have extended shelf-life from weeks to months by reducing metabolic rates and protecting IJs from , enabling better storage and field persistence. Empirical data underscores that while EPNs offer targeted, non-chemical control without residue concerns, their inconsistent field penetration—often below 70% in suboptimal soils—necessitates integration with moisture management for reliable outcomes, tempering expectations beyond promotional claims.

Management strategies and innovations

Following the phase-out of methyl bromide, a broad-spectrum fumigant previously used to control soilborne nematodes in agriculture and mandated for reduction under the Montreal Protocol with U.S. agricultural use largely ending by 2005, alternatives such as fluensulfone have emerged as non-fumigant nematicides. Fluensulfone targets plant-parasitic nematodes like root-knot species, achieving suppression of reproduction by over 90% in controlled trials across multiple nematode types, while exhibiting lower toxicity to non-target free-living soil nematodes compared to older compounds like oxamyl. However, its application can still disrupt soil microbial communities indirectly through reduced host availability, necessitating monitoring of long-term ecosystem effects. Cultural management strategies, including , remain foundational, with rotations incorporating non-host or suppressive crops such as ryegrass or canola reducing galling and populations by up to 70% in field studies. Breeding for host resistance has advanced through , enabling marker-assisted selection; for instance, quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with resistance to Meloidogyne enterolobii in sweetpotato were identified in 2024, facilitating development of varieties that limit nematode without broad environmental interventions. These genetic markers build on established resistance genes like Mi from , adapted via cross-species insights to enhance durability against evolving nematode pathotypes. Integrated nematode management incorporates technologies, with AI-driven tools emerging between 2023 and 2025 to detect infestations via and algorithms, enabling targeted applications that minimize chemical use. For example, convolutional neural networks have been developed to identify nematode hotspots in soil samples with high accuracy, supporting predictive modeling for site-specific interventions. editing via / offers potential for engineering resistance by disrupting nematode effector-targeted host genes, though off-target mutations remain a concern, with studies emphasizing the need for design algorithms to mitigate unintended edits in crop genomes. These innovations prioritize empirical validation over unproven claims, balancing against ecological trade-offs.

Human and Veterinary Significance

Diseases caused by nematodes

Nematodes induce diseases in through mechanisms such as mechanical obstruction, blood loss from attachment sites, larval migration damaging tissues, and inflammatory responses to parasite antigens or excretory products. In , Ascaris lumbricoides adults reside in the , where high worm burdens exceeding 200 individuals can cause by physically tangling and blocking the lumen, potentially leading to or if untreated. This affects 772–892 million people globally, primarily in tropical and subtropical regions with poor , transmitted via ingestion of embryonated eggs from fecally contaminated , , or . Filarial nematodes like cause , where microfilariae released by adult worms in subcutaneous nodules disseminate via skin and eyes; in the ocular tissues, these larvae trigger sclerosing keratitis and , resulting in blindness in approximately 1% of heavily infected individuals through repeated inflammatory cycles. Transmission occurs through bites of infected blackflies (Simulium spp.), which inoculate third-stage larvae during blood meals near fast-flowing rivers. infections ( or ) lead to as adult worms attach to the intestinal mucosa and ingest blood, with each worm consuming up to 0.03–0.2 mL daily, exacerbating in chronic cases affecting over 400 million people. In veterinary contexts, in small ruminants such as sheep attaches to the abomasal mucosa, rupturing capillaries to feed on blood and causing severe , , and ; infections can result in death rates up to 50% in naive lambs during warm, humid conditions favoring larval development on pasture. This parasite contributes to substantial economic losses in the global sheep industry through reduced weight gains, production, and mortality, with resistance to common anthelmintics like benzimidazoles documented since the early 2000s due to overuse. Zoonotic nematodes including Toxocara canis and T. cati cause in humans, where ingested eggs from contaminated soil or pet hatch, and larvae penetrate the intestinal wall to migrate through viscera, eliciting granulomatous inflammation in liver, lungs, and eyes; this syndrome manifests as fever, , and potential vision loss, with seroprevalence indicating exposure in 5–14% of U.S. populations but clinical disease rare outside young children. Transmission causality stems from accidental ingestion of embryonated eggs shed in canine or feline , which embryonate in moist soil over 2–4 weeks.

Treatment challenges and resistance issues

Anthelmintic drugs such as , which disrupts microtubule formation by binding to β-tubulin, and , which hyperpolarizes nematode cells via glutamate-gated activation, form the cornerstone of treatment for parasitic nematodes. Resistance emerges rapidly, often within 10 years of widespread use, driven by selective pressure from frequent dosing in and mass administration in humans. A primary resistance mechanism involves upregulated efflux pumps, particularly ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters like P-glycoproteins, which actively expel drugs from parasite tissues, reducing intracellular concentrations. This non-specific adaptation contributes to multidrug resistance across classes, including macrocyclic lactones like and benzimidazoles like . In livestock, such as sheep infected with , resistance prevalence is high; a 2008 survey of U.S. farms found resistance in isolates from 76% of properties and benzimidazole resistance in 98%. Multidrug resistance, spanning multiple classes, affects up to 12% of herds in some regions. In human programs targeting filarial nematodes, mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin and albendazole has reduced lymphatic filariasis infections by 74% globally since 2000. However, post-MDA recrudescence occurs, with persistent low-level transmission linked to zoonotic reservoirs; for Brugia malayi, animal hosts facilitate reinfection after apparent elimination in humans. Emerging resistance in vectors and parasites threatens sustained gains, as microfilarial prevalence rebounds in surveillance despite prior MDA success. Vaccine development encounters persistent failure from antigenic variation, where nematodes evade immunity through diverse surface proteins and rapid mutation. Empirical trials in animal models yield low efficacy, often under 20% reduction in worm burdens for candidates against strongylids and filariae, underscoring evolutionary adaptability that outpaces fixed antigens. No commercial vaccines exist, with protection inconsistent across breeds, ages, and challenge doses.

Controversies in diagnostic and therapeutic applications

The N-NOSE test, launched commercially in in 2023 by Hirotsu Bio Science, employs Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes to detect cancer through chemotactic responses to volatile organic compounds in samples. Proponents claim sensitivities up to 95% for various cancers, but independent analyses have highlighted concerns over specificity, with reports of false positive rates exceeding expectations in cancer-free individuals, prompting from clinicians about its readiness for widespread screening. These issues stem from limited validation in diverse populations and the absence of large-scale randomized controlled trials to confirm efficacy against standard diagnostics like or biomarkers. Proposals for gene drives in vectors to disrupt transmission of filarial nematodes, such as those causing (), have sparked debate over ecological risks. While engineered drives could suppress vector populations or render them refractory to nematode development, critics warn of unintended nontarget effects, including to non-target and potential disruptions from altered mosquito dynamics. Risk assessments emphasize the need for strategies, as uncontrolled spread could exacerbate in filariasis-endemic regions. Entomopathogenic nematodes used in biocontrol applications face for discrepancies between laboratory efficacy and field performance, where environmental factors like conditions reduce control of target pests. Overreliance on these agents has been questioned amid 2025 studies revealing residues' harm to non-target beneficial nematodes, undermining and services. Such findings highlight the challenges in integrating nematode-based therapies with chemical interventions without to free-living nematode communities essential for cycling.

Scientific and Biotechnological Applications

Model organisms in research

Caenorhabditis elegans serves as a primary in biological research due to its simple anatomy, short generation time, and genetic tractability, facilitating studies on development, neurobiology, and aging. The complete wiring diagram, or , of its 302-neuron nervous system was reconstructed from electron micrographs in 1986, providing the first full map of a multicellular organism's neural circuitry. This milestone enabled detailed analyses of neural connectivity and function, contributing to foundational insights in . The of C. elegans, spanning 97 megabases and encoding over 19,000 genes, was fully sequenced in 1998, revealing substantial conservation with human genes, including approximately 40% of those linked to diseases. RNA interference (RNAi) techniques pioneered in C. elegans have allowed large-scale functional genomic screens, identifying gene functions and orthologs conserved across species, which has accelerated discoveries in conserved pathways relevant to human biology. These tools have underpinned thousands of studies, with over 40,000 publications on C. elegans indexed in as of 2023, quantifying its impact on fields from to organismal physiology. Pristionchus pacificus complements C. elegans in (evo-devo), particularly through comparative analyses of formation, where differences in and plasticity highlight evolutionary divergence in despite conserved genetic components. Such studies reveal mechanisms of developmental robustness and adaptability, informing broader principles of morphological in nematodes. Recent advances leverage CRISPR-Cas9 in C. elegans to model human neurodegenerative conditions, such as , by introducing mutations in orthologous genes like those encoding aggregates, enabling high-throughput generation of mutant libraries exceeding 10,000 strains for screening therapeutic interventions. These efforts, spanning 2023 onward, underscore nematodes' ongoing utility in dissecting causal pathways of neural decline.

Genetic and molecular studies

Nematode genomes are characteristically compact, with Caenorhabditis elegans featuring approximately 100 million base pairs organized across six chromosomes and encoding around 20,000 , resulting in high gene density that facilitates forward genetic screens to dissect function through and phenotypic . This density, coupled with low numbers and operon-like structures in some species, contrasts with more expansive eukaryotic genomes and underscores evolutionary streamlining for rapid development and environmental response. In parasitic nematodes, genome architecture often includes , as observed in root-knot species like , where hybridization and whole-genome duplication enable genomic plasticity and host adaptation without sexual recombination, allowing quick evolutionary shifts to new plant hosts via variation and allelic diversity. Such mechanisms support by amplifying effectors that manipulate host physiology, distinct from the diploid stability in free-living relatives. Plant-parasitic nematodes deploy extensive effector secretomes, with Meloidogyne species harboring suites of secreted proteins—identified through proteomic and genomic analyses—that reprogram host cells for gall formation, many acquired via from , enabling of host signaling pathways and degradation of cell walls. These effectors, numbering in the hundreds per , exemplify causal adaptations for invasion, as their disruption impairs infectivity in functional assays.

Industrial and environmental uses

Entomopathogenic nematodes, such as species in the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis, have been commercialized as biopesticides since the 1980s for targeting soil-dwelling insect pests. These nematodes infect insects via that produce lethal toxins, enabling effective control in applications like turfgrass and niche crop protection, with market growth driven by demand for reduced chemical reliance. Commercial formulations, produced through or methods, offer targeted efficacy but face challenges in storage stability and field application consistency compared to synthetic alternatives. In environmental applications, free-living nematodes contribute to wastewater treatment processes by preying on and in systems, facilitating organic matter degradation. Pilot studies have demonstrated that nematode predation can reduce excess by up to 45% through controlled biomass growth inhibition, potentially lowering disposal costs in treatment plants. However, their presence is often indicative of low food-to-microorganism ratios and older ages, requiring operational adjustments like increased wasting to maintain treatment efficiency. Biotechnological uses of nematodes for recombinant protein expression remain exploratory, with systems leveraging species like for eukaryotic protein production facing scalability limitations due to slower growth rates and complex culturing compared to bacterial or platforms such as Pichia pastoris. Research into nematode-specific vectors shows promise for but has not achieved industrial-scale adoption, constrained by lower yields and higher production costs relative to established microbial hosts.

References

  1. http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/General/Intronem.htm
  2. https://microbenotes.com/phylum-nematoda/
  3. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/69/11/867/5554564
  4. https://www.globalsoilbiodiversity.org/blog-beneath-our-feet/2019/7/31/nematodes-uncovered-the-most-abundant-animals-on-the-planet-for-each-human-there-are-60-billion-nematodes-living-in-the-soil
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8117023/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2563142/
  7. https://currentprotocols.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpet.35
  8. https://www.etymonline.com/word/nematode
  9. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Nematoda
  10. https://www.wur.nl/en/article/nematology-in-the-acient-times.htm
  11. https://parasitetesting.com/definition-of-roundworm
  12. https://www.akamai.university/files/theme/AkamaiJournal/PJST11_1_466.pdf
  13. https://www.gbif.org/species/165594119
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/nematode
  15. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/anatomy-and-physiology/roundworms
  16. https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/NEMATODA
  17. https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/nematodes-8294/
  18. http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/General/Phylumname.htm
  19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7322617/
  20. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00331238
  21. https://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3148.1.11
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/387489a0
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2614232/
  24. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r41
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/nematomorpha
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227695710_Systematic_relationships_of_Nematomorpha_based_on_molecular_and_morphological_data
  27. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-79962-3
  28. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.16.562615v1.full-text
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39737664/
  30. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.769565/full
  31. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/jgs2021-107
  32. https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/57/3/455/4093795
  33. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-3836-7_4
  34. https://mapress.com/zt/article/download/zootaxa.5114.1.1/46883/51986
  35. http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/taxadata/orderkey.htm
  36. http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/Taxadata/Amphidae.htm
  37. https://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/thematic-sitemap/theme/spi/soil-biodiversity/soil-organisms/by-type/nematodes/en/
  38. https://communities.springernature.com/posts/nematodes-uncovered-the-most-abundant-animals-on-the-planet
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Global-map-of-total-nematode-abundance-per-unit-area-m-Correcting-for-the-lower-bulk_fig4_334662921
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11974547/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12317692/
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065308X15000299
  43. https://bsppjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02527.x
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256774780_Traces_of_marine_nematodes_from_470_million_years_old_Early_Ordovician_rocks_in_China
  45. https://www.phylumtech.com/_extrafiles/ltdm/e13_pub2_poinar_nematology2008.pdf
  46. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2016.0493
  47. https://elifesciences.org/articles/86283
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10348738/
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982213000298
  50. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article/doi/10.1144/jgs2021-107/611205
  51. https://timetree.org/public/data/pdf/Blaxter2009Chap28.pdf
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376516489_Phylogenomic_Insights_into_the_Evolution_and_Origin_of_Nematoda
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3746845/
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10097391/
  55. https://www.science.org/content/article/when-oxygen-disappeared-early-marine-animals-really-started-evolving
  56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23682915/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4413787/
  58. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007310
  59. https://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/General/Physiology/PhysiologicalAdaptations.htm
  60. http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/taxadata/Nemata.htm
  61. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-biology2/chapter/phylum-nematoda/
  62. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19745/
  63. https://www.wormatlas.org/hermaphrodite/cuticle/mainframe.htm
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211320714000116
  65. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/215/8/1247/11327/The-diversity-of-hydrostatic-skeletons
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/amphid
  67. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30253131/
  68. https://books.byui.edu/Invertebrate_Life/cdltnmgayw
  69. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1976.0085
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5118333/
  71. https://www.wormatlas.org/hermaphrodite/excretory/mainframe.htm
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4858784/
  73. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/General_Biology_%28Boundless%29/28%253A_Invertebrates/28.04%253A_Superphylum_Ecdysozoa/28.4B%253A_Phylum_Nematoda
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/nematoda
  75. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/59/1/255/21859/The-Respiratory-Physiology-of-the-Marine-Nematodes
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/dioecy
  77. https://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/General/Physiology/repstrat.htm
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3789810/
  79. https://www.wormatlas.org/hermaphrodite/introduction/Introframeset.html
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10771965/
  81. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-9-15
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10325857/
  83. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/70586
  84. https://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/Pages/IntroNematodes.aspx
  85. http://eagri.org/eagri50/PATH172/lec07.pdf
  86. https://brainu.org/sites/brainu.org/files/lessons/is_c_elegans_information_sheet.pdf
  87. https://www.certisbio.com/blog/lifecycle-of-nematodes
  88. https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/hookworm/index.html
  89. https://revistacultivar.com/plant-health/meloidogyne-incognita
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12292910/
  91. https://cropprotectionnetwork.org/publications/an-overview-of-root-knot-nematodes
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574521000444
  93. https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/article/55/5/B215/2948101
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4931849/
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891584918324109
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1413578/
  97. https://journals.biologists.com/dmm/article/3/7-8/415/2474/The-role-of-insulin-IGF-like-signaling-in-C
  98. https://www.aging-us.com/article/100367/text
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2630471/
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2206098/
  101. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1524727113
  102. https://www.nature.com/articles/npjamd201610
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8167245/
  104. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0010030
  105. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10935523/
  106. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1010798
  107. https://www.freethink.com/science/cryptobiosis-nematodes
  108. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-10-69
  109. https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/45/5/741/624401
  110. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2314793121
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10312484/
  112. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228104
  113. https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-018-2946-x
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9737000/
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405624034802
  116. http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/taxadata/Rhabidae.htm
  117. http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/Ecology/Behavior.htm
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038071715001182
  119. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347490312_Mononchida_The_Predatory_Soil_Nematodes
  120. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sae2.70057
  121. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep32862
  122. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00572/full
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3380510/
  124. https://extension.umd.edu/sites/extension.umd.edu/files/2021-03/Chap4-Soil-Health-web-version.pdf
  125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038071713001387
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4388577/
  127. https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/lom3.10128
  128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343256181_The_Depleted_Carbon_Isotopic_Signature_of_Nematodes_and_Harpacticoids_and_Their_Place_in_Carbon_Processing_in_Fish_Farm_Sediments
  129. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00970/full
  130. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065229615000142
  131. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.800030/full
  132. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/6/671
  133. https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/MPMI-05-12-0128-CR
  134. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.00961/full
  135. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.17089
  136. https://teleosag.com/teleos-blog/5-most-common-plant-parasitic-nematodes-treated-with-telone/
  137. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2014.00089/full
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2634120/
  139. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.01087/full
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9304131/
  141. https://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/taxadata/G060S30.aspx
  142. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/encyclopedia/soybean-cyst-nematode
  143. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546648/
  144. https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/lymphaticfilariasis/index.html
  145. https://www.who.int/health-topics/lymphatic-filariasis
  146. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1360593/full
  147. https://www.parasite-journal.org/articles/parasite/full_html/2014/01/parasite130064/parasite130064.html
  148. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/230490-overview
  149. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6708a3.htm
  150. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/vms3.951
  151. http://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/General/anintro.htm
  152. https://nimss.org/projects/view/mrp/outline/19019
  153. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.726057/full
  154. https://www.pioneer.com/us/agronomy/corn_nematodes.html
  155. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40672560/
  156. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356492181_Yield_loss_assessment_of_tomato_through_Meloidogyne_incognita_kofoid_and_white_chitwood_in_Himachal_Pradesh_India
  157. https://nimss.org/projects/view/mrp/outline/18774
  158. https://extension.umn.edu/soybean-pest-management/soybean-cyst-nematode-management-guide
  159. https://cropprotectionnetwork.org/publications/corn-disease-loss-estimates-from-the-united-states-and-ontario-canada-2023
  160. https://www.cropscience.bayer.us/articles/bayer/parasitic-nematodes-corn
  161. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1316090318590258/posts/2821366564729285/
  162. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024013562
  163. https://ag.purdue.edu/department/btny/labs/zhang/nematode_soil_survey.html
  164. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-06488-7
  165. http://www.nematodeinformation.com/nematode-information/entomopathogenic-nematodes-kill-their-insect-hosts-within-24-hours
  166. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1042145/full
  167. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/insect-science/articles/10.3389/finsc.2023.1195254/full
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2987532/
  169. https://www.academia.edu/122256483/The_role_of_drought_in_the_efficacy_of_some_entomopathogenic_nematodes
  170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249433537_The_effect_of_application_techniques_on_field-scale_efficacy_Can_the_use_of_entomopathogenic_nematodes_reduce_damage_by_western_corn_rootworm_larvae
  171. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0929139316303328
  172. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/50620/Wu_S_D_2013.pdf
  173. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/beneficial-nematodes-market-future-outlook-1fylc/
  174. https://www.verifiedmarketreports.com/product/beneficial-nematodes-market/
  175. https://ejbpc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41938-025-00864-1
  176. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7655/5/4/52
  177. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022201125001223
  178. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964424002494
  179. https://www.epa.gov/ods-phaseout/methyl-bromide
  180. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5507134/
  181. https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=420560
  182. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6929642/
  183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8371937/
  184. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.20220
  185. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11427482/
  186. https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/1027482-rapid-development-of-marketable-root-knot-nematode-resistant-sweetpotato-varieties-translation-of-genomics-and-advanced-phenomics-into-on-farm-crop-management-solutions.html
  187. https://www.global-agriculture.com/crop-protection/commercial-digital-tool-to-detect-harmful-nematodes-through-satellite-images/
  188. https://indiaai.gov.in/article/ai-and-machine-learning-in-nematode-detection-and-control
  189. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1349209/full
  190. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1478398/full
  191. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7401131/
  192. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430796/
  193. https://www.cdc.gov/sth/about/ascariasis.html
  194. https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/ascariasis/index.html
  195. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/onchocerciasis
  196. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559027/
  197. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6220a4.htm
  198. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections
  199. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8261/
  200. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9495197/
  201. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/as/as-573-w.pdf
  202. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10818805/
  203. https://news.okstate.edu/articles/veterinary-medicine/2021/veterinary_viewpoints_controlling_internal_parasites_in_sheep_and_goats.html
  204. https://www.ajtmh.org/view/journals/tpmd/90/5/article-p810.xml
  205. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5552322/
  206. https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/toxocariasis/index.html
  207. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065308X16300124
  208. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211320711000066
  209. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11126493/
  210. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19072608/
  211. https://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12917-020-02721-9
  212. https://www.who.int/news/item/29-10-2020-lymphatic-filariasis-reporting-continued-progress-towards-elimination-as-a-public-health-problem
  213. https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013593
  214. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971225000141
  215. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/8/3/555
  216. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1959410/
  217. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277253592300029X
  218. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03733-9
  219. https://perexpteamworks.com/en/controversy-tiny-nematode-worms-cancer-news/
  220. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gene-drives-could-fight-malaria-and-other-global-killers-but-might-have-unintended-consequences/
  221. https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/200518-gene-drives-report.pdf
  222. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK379271/
  223. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41348-025-01146-6
  224. https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2025/05/soil-nematodes-vital-to-plant-health-threatened-by-nontarget-pesticide-exposure-study-finds/
  225. https://phys.org/news/2025-02-global-pesticides-major-contributor-biodiversity.html
  226. https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2025/09/review-of-scientific-literature-finds-all-pesticide-classes-threaten-nontarget-organisms-and-biodiversity/
  227. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1986.0056
  228. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9851916/
  229. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590028518300012
  230. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22Caenorhabditis+elegans%22&filter=years.1974-2023
  231. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0610799104
  232. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1223777/full
  233. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/7/3030
  234. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20031/
  235. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19768/
  236. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006777
  237. https://bsppjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mpp.12961
  238. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2568823/
  239. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0805946105
  240. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00125/full
  241. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288153834_Entomopathogenic_nematodes_From_science_to_commercial_use
  242. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3578468/
  243. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398624063070
  244. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12081348/
  245. https://teamaquafix.com/nematodes/
  246. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC528926/
  247. https://rune.une.edu.au/entities/publication/a78b8e2a-15cb-4b2a-9012-2a9c108c787d
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.