Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Wreck diving
View on Wikipedia
Wreck diving is recreational diving where the wreckage of ships, aircraft and other artificial structures are explored. The term is used mainly by recreational and technical divers. Professional divers, when diving on a shipwreck, generally refer to the specific task, such as salvage work, accident investigation or archaeological survey. Although most wreck dive sites are at shipwrecks, there is an increasing trend to scuttle retired ships to create artificial reef sites. Diving to crashed aircraft can also be considered wreck diving.[1] The recreation of wreck diving makes no distinction as to how the vessel ended up on the bottom.
Some wreck diving involves penetration of the wreckage, making a direct ascent to the surface impossible for a part of the dive.[2]
Environment
[edit]The environment of wreck diving is sunken shipwrecks and other vehicles and structures, either sunk by misfortune, acts of war, or intentionally, as targets in military exercises, to serve as artificial reefs, or as recreational dive sites for the diving tourism industry. Wrecks sunk as tourist dive sites are usually cleaned up and have many hazards removed before scuttling, and are usually sunk in a place where the other natural hazards are not too serious. Wrecks sunk through misadventure tend to be in places with a wider range of environmental hazards, in many cases contributing to the wrecking event. In many cases the wreck itself presents a range of hazrds, such as entanglement, sharp edged metal plating, disorienting interiors, unstable structure and loose silt deposits.[3]
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2024) |
Reasons for diving wrecks
[edit]A shipwreck may be attractive to divers for several reasons:
- it serves as an artificial reef, which creates a habitat for many types of marine life[4]
- it often is a large structure with many interesting parts and machinery, which is not normally accessible to casual observers on working, floating vessels[4]
- it often has an interesting history[4]
- it presents new skill challenges for scuba divers to manage the risks associated with wreck penetration.
- it is part of the underwater cultural heritage and may be an important archaeological resource[4]
- it provides a first-hand insight into context for the loss, such as causal connections, geographical associations, trade patterns and many other areas, providing a microcosm of our maritime heritage and maritime history[4]
- it may contain artifacts of historical, artistic and/or monetary value, which can be recovered for profit (treasure hunting) or collection purposes (ranging from rare collector's items to souvenirs, memorabilia or other "trophies", such as crew members' or passengers' personal belongings, nautical instruments, brass portholes or silverware, cutlery, intact china or other tableware).[4]
Types of wreck diving
[edit]
In The Advanced Wreck Diving Handbook,[5] Gary Gentile sub-divides wreck diving into three categories:
- Non-penetration diving (i.e. swimming outside the wreck)
- Limited penetration diving, within the "light zone", the parts of the interior of the wreck from which light entering the wreck from an exit can be seen. There may be parts of the interior illuminated by exterior light penetrating though holes too small to exit through, and these are not generally considered part of the light zone, as they cannot be used as an escape route. Limited penetration limits penetration to where the diver can see the way out.
- Full penetration diving, beyond the "light zone"
Each subsequent level involves additional hazards and greater risk, and therefore will normally require additional learning and experience to develop the required competence, and may also require additional equipment and the competence to use it effectively.[6]
Non-penetration wreck diving is the least hazardous form of wreck diving, although divers still need to be aware of the entanglement risks presented by fishing nets and fishing lines which may be snagged to the wreck (wrecks are often popular fishing sites), and the underlying terrain may present greater risk of sharp edges.[2]
Penetration within the light zone presents greater hazards due to overhead and greater proximity of the wreck's structure, but because of the proximity of a visible exit point, and some amount of external light, those hazards are more manageable. However, there is clearly a much greater risk of entanglement and silt out inside of the structure, as well as the requirement to move laterally to a defined exit point before one can surface in the event of an emergency.[2]
Full penetration involves the greatest level of risks, including the risk of getting lost within the structure, the risk of complete darkness in the event of multiple light failures, and the inability to escape unassisted in the event of a complete disruption to breathing gas supply.[2]
These categorisations broadly coincide with the traditional division between "recreational" wreck diving (taught as a specialty course by recreational diver training agencies and normally limited to the "light zone" and/or 100-130 cumulative feet of depth plus penetration) and "technical" wreck diving (taught as a stand-alone course by technical diver training agencies).[2]
Procedures and safety
[edit]Wrecks may present a variety of site-specific hazards to divers. Wrecks are often fouled by fishing lines or nets and the structure may be fragile and break without notice. Penetration diving, where the diver enters a shipwreck, is an activity exposing the diver to hazards of getting lost, entrapment and consequently running out of breathing gas. Management of these risks requires special skills and equipment.[7] Many attractive or well preserved wrecks are in deeper water requiring deep diving precautions. Training agencies recommend that at least one cutting device be carried in case the diver is entangled with fishing lines, nets or ropes and to have a spare light source in case the primary light fails. If penetrating a wreck, a guideline tied off before entering a wreck and run out inside the wreck is required by training agencies. A guideline can help a diver to find the way out more easily in case of low visibility, and has often been necessary for survival. For penetration diving, a reserve of breathing gas sufficient to allow the diver to exit the wreck and make a safe ascent in the event of any reasonably foreseeable single failure of equipment is required by training agencies' protocols and scientific codes of practice.[citation needed] Many wreck divers use a minimum of the rule-of-thirds for gas management.[8] This allows for 1/3 of the gas down and into the wreck, 1/3 for exit and ascent and 1/3 reserve. In dives where decompression stops are required, this may not be sufficient. In addition, because of the potential fragility of the wreck, the likelihood of disturbing sediments or disturbing the many marine animals that take advantage of the artificial habitat offered by the wreck, extra care is required when moving and finning. Many divers are taught to use alternative finning methods such as frog kick or modified flutter kick which direct the thrust of the fins away from the bottom where most of the silt is likely to deposit. Good buoyancy control is necessary for safe and non-destructive diving in the environment of a wreck.[2]

Connecting to the wreck
[edit]There are several methods for getting the divers to the wreck. The preferred method will depend on local conditions. In low visibility, hooking onto the wreck is a reliable way of ensuring the divers will find it, but this procedure requires a wreck that is structurally suitable for snagging with a grapnel or anchor. A shotline which can be dropped off the wreckage is less likely to damage the wreck or become snagged and difficult to retrieve, but this requires appropriate visibility for the divers to be sure of finding the wreckage. When it is important to get back to the shotline for ascent, it may be tied to the wreckage by the first divers on site using a guide-line, which is retrieved by the last divers to leave. When there is a strong current, it may be necessary to drop in from up-current, a technique sometimes known as "parachuting in" or "free drop". The wreck may be first marked with a shotline, if this is considered useful or necessary. Divers may surface on the shotline, anchorline or personal decompression buoy depending on the conditions.[9]
When using the anchor line to control ascents and descents, a "tag line" may be used between the anchor line and the stern of the vessel, to allow secure transfer between these points in a current. When live-boating there are alternative methods for descent, including free drop and descent on the shotline.[10]
Penetration navigation
[edit]In technical penetration diving, there are broadly two approaches.
Use of guidelines
[edit]The conventional approach involves the use of continuous guidelines laid from a wreck reel, tied just outside the entrance point, just inside the entrance point, and at intervals inside (to mitigate the risk of a cut line, or a "line trap"[11]). In deeper penetrations, two reels are used, so that in the event of a total loss of visibility where the diver loses contact with the primary line or the primary line gets cut, the secondary line can be anchored and then used as a reference point to sweep for the primary line.[10] Procedures and techniques for navigation inside the wreck using a guide line are very much the same as in cave penetration.[12]
Progressive penetration
[edit]An alternative approach, popularised to a limited extent by deep wreck divers in the American Northeast, is referred to as "progressive penetration". Progressive penetration eschews the use of guidelines, but the diver makes several successive penetrations, each deeper than the last, memorising the layout for both the inward and outward journeys. The method is vulnerable to complete loss of visibility in a silt-out, and any disorientation in an unfamiliar area or due to nitrogen narcosis.[10] It relies on accurate recall where an error can be fatal, and where a more reliable option is easily and affordably available. As a navigational technique, progressive penetration is generally considered unsafe. As a surveying technique it tends to be inaccurate unless measurements are also recorded. It is not taught by any of the mainstream recreational diver training agencies.[13]
Divers engaging in penetration diving are conventionally taught to carry three lights - a primary light and two backup lights - thereby virtually eliminating the risk of completely losing light inside the wreck. Nonetheless, total loss of visibility due to a silt-out remains a risk.[10]
Deep wreck diving
[edit]
Wrecks in shallower waters tend to deteriorate faster than wrecks in deeper water due to higher biological activity. Accordingly, many of the older and larger shipwrecks that tend to offer full penetration dives tend to be deeper dives. This can present additional complications; if a wreck dive is intended to be a decompression dive, then the diver will normally carry decompression gases in side-mounted cylinders.[10] However, it is difficult to penetrate many wrecks with both back-mounted and side-mounted cylinders, requiring divers to either use a different configuration, or leave their decompression gases outside the wreck prior to penetration. This creates the possibility of a diver being unable to relocate their decompression gases if they exit the wreck at a different point from which they enter it.[14] Furthermore, regulations have been implemented in prevention of fatal dives that restricts deep-sea wreck diving only towards experienced diving, such as the Britannic for instance.
Training
[edit]Because of the increasing popularity and higher risk of wreck diving, many diver training organizations such as Scuba Diving International and the Professional Association of Diving Instructors provide specialist wreck diver training courses, which divers are advised to take before wreck diving.[15] Such courses [7] typically teach skills such as air management and the proper use of guidelines and reels. Most recreational diving organizations teach divers only to penetrate to, at most, the limit of the "light zone" or a maximum aggregate surface distance (depth and penetration) of 100 feet. Other technical diving organizations, such as IANTD, TDI and ANDI teach advanced wreck courses that require more extensive training and competence and more safety equipment, and prepare divers for levels of wreck penetration beyond the areas illuminated by ambient light. The Nautical Archaeology Society in the UK teaches awareness of underwater cultural heritage issues as well as practical diver and archaeological skills. In this context, some research projects are investigating the potentialities offered by digital technologies to adopt virtual replicas of the underwater wrecksite for training purposes.[16] Other organizations, such as the Artificial Reef Society of British Columbia (ARSBC) deliberately create artificial reefs to provide features for divers to explore, as well as substrates for marine life to thrive upon.[citation needed]
Special equipment
[edit]As long as there is no penetration of the wreck, no special wreck diving equipment is required, and equipment is based on the situation outside the wreck. For example, if the wreck is at a depth that is classified as technical deep diving, then the basic equipment requirement will be based on that.
In the limited penetration diving zone, at least one diving reel and one primary light are recommended in addition to the basic equipment for the outside environment. Additional breathing gas for the rule of thirds in an overhead environment increases the required cylinder size. Sufficient emergency gas must be available to reach the surface for any reasonably foreseeable emergency. This may be in the form of buddy or team supplied reserve gas or as a bailout cylinder carried by the diver
For full penetration diving, additional safety equipment is necessary.[17] This is similar to equipment used in cave diving, but more cut-resistant line may be used. Most of this equipment is to reduce the risk of getting lost or trapped inside the wreckage. The most important components are lights and guide lines. Lights include a primary light, a secondary light and a positioning light.[clarification needed] Line may be carried on, and deployed from, a primary reel, a safety reel, and a jump/gap reel. A redundant emergency gas supply is necessary. Depending on the dive plan,[clarification needed] double cylinders are standard, even when stage cylinders are also carried.[citation needed] A cave diving helmet is useful protection for the head, and gloves protect against sharp metal edges. Equipment should be stowed compactly, to reduce the risk of snagging on wreckage and being damaged or trapping the diver. Rubber bands and metal or plastic clips are used to secure loose or dangling equipment.
Impact of recreational scuba diving on wrecks
[edit]The impact of recreational scuba diving on recreational dive values and the cultural heritage of shipwrecks has been found to comprise four basic types:[4]
- The removal of artifacts and associated disturbance to wreck sites,
- Direct contact with wrecks and the benthic biota living on them by divers and their equipment,
- Exhaled air bubbles trapped inside the wreckage,
- Impact damage by anchors of dive boats, considered by some researchers to be the most damaging form of impact associated with recreational wreck diving.
Protection of wrecks
[edit]In many countries, wrecks are legally protected from unauthorized salvage or desecration.
In the United Kingdom, three Acts protect wrecks:
- Protection of Wrecks Act 1973: certain designated, charted, historic or dangerous sites may not be dived without a license
- Protection of Military Remains Act 1986: all military aircraft and 16 designated ships are considered war graves that can only be dived with a license. Other non-designated ships may be dived providing the divers do not enter, disturb or remove artifacts
- Merchant Shipping Act 1995: all wrecks and cargoes are owned: each artifact removed must be reported to the Receiver of Wreck
Wrecks that are protected are denoted as such on nautical charts (such as admiralty charts); any diving restrictions should be adhered to. Historic wrecks (often but not always defined as being more than 50 years of age) are often protected from pillaging and looting through national laws protecting cultural heritage.[18] Internationally they may be protected by a State ratifying the Unesco Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. In this case pillaging is not allowed. One such example is the Queen Anne's Revenge which is undergoing archaeological recovery by the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (NC DNCR) near Beaufort Inlet, NC.[19]
In 2003 the Greek Ministry of Culture, issued a Ministerial Order classifying "any wreck of ship or aeroplane, sunk for longer than 50 years from the present" as Cultural Assets / Monuments, with a protection zone of 300 meters around them. Terms and conditions for visiting any monument in Greece are set by the Ministry of Culture.[citation needed]
In South African waters, the wrecks of ships or aircraft, and any associated cargo, debris or artifact more than 60 years old and are protected by the National Heritage Resources Act number 25 of 1999 (NHRA).[20] The law of salvage and finds does not apply to historical shipwrecks, which are considered by the NHRA to be archaeological material, and as such are the property of the state, administered by SAHRA in trust for the nation, and may not be disturbed in any way except under the terms of a permit issued by the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA). There are severe penalties for contravening the Act, including heavy fines and jail terms. All members of the South African Police Services, and Customs and Excise officers may act as Heritage Inspectors in terms of the Act, with powers of search, confiscation and arrest. Historical wrecks may be visited provided that the sites are not disturbed or interfered with and no artifacts are removed or damaged.[21]
Wreck diving sites
[edit]
There are thousands of popular wreck diving sites throughout the world.[22] Some of these are artificial wrecks or sunk deliberately to attract divers (such as USS Spiegel Grove and USS Oriskany in Florida, MV Bianca C. in Grenada, and the wrecks of Recife in Pernambuco/Brazil which include artificial and disaster wrecks). Diver trails, also called wreck trails, can be used to allow scuba-divers to visit and understand archaeological sites that are suitable for scuba-diving.[23] One excellent example is the Florida Public Archaeology Network's (FPAN) "Florida Panhandle Shipwreck Trail."[24]
Along the Outer Banks, navigational challenges posed by the Diamond Shoals area off Cape Hatteras, caused the loss of thousands of ships and an unknown number of human lives. More than 5000 ships have sunk in these waters since record keeping began in 1526.[25] Among the better known shipwrecks was USS Monitor,[26] a participant in the Battle of Hampton Roads during the American Civil War. Monitor foundered on 31 December 1862 off Cape Hatteras. During World War II German U-boats would lie offshore and silhouette passing freighters and tankers against the lights onshore. Dozens of ships along the North Carolina coast were torpedoed in this fashion by German submarines in what became known as Torpedo Alley. Popular wrecks include the German submarine U-352, USS Monitor, USS Schurz (SMS Geier), USS Tarpon, USS Yancey, USS Indra, USS Aeolus and USCGC Spar.[27]
Others are wrecks of vessels lost in disasters (such as RMS Rhone in the British Virgin Islands, Zenobia in Cyprus and the many shipwrecks off the Isles of Scilly in England). In the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand, the wreck of MS Mikhail Lermontov, a 177-metre (581 ft) cruise liner which was lost in 1986, is a popular dive site. Lying at 37 metres (121 ft) underwater, the wreck is suitable for recreational and technical divers.[28][29]
More unusual are wrecks of structures, such as the wreck of the old cruise ship pier in Saint Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, destroyed by Hurricane Hugo in 1989. As part of the recovery and replacement of the Frederiksted Pier, the old pier was to be removed and sunk far out at sea in 3,600-metre (11,800 ft) deep waters. Much of the old pier was used to create an artificial reef. Several barges carried the wreckage three kilometres (1.9 mi) down the beach, and dumped the wreckage of steel girders, vehicles, concrete tubes, pylons, and pavement into 33-metre (108 ft) deep waters to create a dive site now known as Armageddon.[citation needed]
A number of wreck diving sites are ships lost to wartime hostilities, such as SS Thistlegorm in the Red Sea, the wrecks of Subic Bay and Coron in the Philippines, SS President Coolidge in Vanuatu and the "ghost fleet" of Truk Lagoon. In the Andaman Islands, the Inket Wreck, where a Japanese ship sank during World War II is a dive site near Duncan Island.[citation needed]
Some regions are particularly noted for the number and quality of wreck dive sites, such as Truk Lagoon in Micronesia, Scapa Flow in Orkney Islands, Scotland, the Outer Banks of North Carolina, known as the "Graveyard of the Atlantic", and the Great Lakes.[30]
For technical divers there are a few wrecks that have attracted widespread popularity. For years SS Andrea Doria was regarded as the pinnacle of challenges to the wreck diver, but, since the popularisation of trimix as a breathing gas, technical divers now dive deeper and more challenging wrecks, and Andrea Doria is now considered by some to be a good training wreck for trimix divers.[31]
History
[edit]- Connections with marine salvage and underwater archaeology
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2021) |
See also
[edit]- Archaeology of shipwrecks – Study of human activity through the analysis of shipwreck artifacts
- Aviation archaeology – Finding, documenting, recovering, and preserving sites important in aviation history
- Cave diving – Diving in water-filled caves
- Diver training – Processes to develop the skills and knowledge to dive safely underwater
- Lists of shipwrecks
- Maritime archaeology – Archaeological study of human interaction with the sea
- Michigan Underwater Preserves – Protected areas of the Great Lakes on Michigan's coast
- Nautical Archaeology Society – British organisation to further research in nautical archaeology for the public benefit
- Marine salvage – Recovering a ship or cargo after a maritime casualty
- Salvage diving – Diving work associated with the recovery of vehicles, cargo and structures
- Scuba diving – Swimming underwater, breathing gas carried by the diver
- Scuba diving tourism – Industry based on recreational diver travel
- Shipwreck – Physical remains of a beached or sunk ship
- Sinking ships for wreck diving sites – Scuttling old ships to produce artificial reefs
- Underwater archaeology – Study of human activity via evidence found underwater
References
[edit]- ^ "The Search is in the Planning". Canadian Harvard Aircraft Association Dive Recovery Team. 2008. Archived from the original on 13 June 2015.
- ^ a b c d e f Kohler, Richie (29 July 2021). "Hazards in Wreck Diving". www.dansa.org. Retrieved 12 April 2024.
- ^ "Wreck Diving Safety - NAUI Worldwide". www.naui.org. 2019-04-03. Retrieved 2025-03-25.
- ^ a b c d e f g Edney, Joanne (November 2006). "Impacts of Recreational Scuba Diving on Shipwrecks in Australia and the Pacific - A Review". Micronesian Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 5 (1/2 Combined). Albury NSW, Australia: Heritage Futures International. ISSN 1449-7336.
- ^ Gentile, Gary (July 1988). Advanced Wreck Diving Guide (3rd ed.). Cornell Maritime Press. ISBN 978-0-87033-380-4.
- ^ "Basic wreck diving vs. Advanced wreck diving". Technical Diving International. 2012-08-06. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
- ^ a b - PADI Wreck Diver training and qualifications Archived 2009-04-18 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Ange, Michael (15 August 2018). "How to Dive a Wreck: The Spiegel Grove". www.scubadiving.com. Retrieved 12 April 2024.
- ^ Dituri, Joseph (August 2008). "23: Expeditions - Wrecks". In Mount, Tom; Dituri, Joseph (eds.). Exploration and Mixed Gas Diving Encyclopedia (1st ed.). Miami Shores, Florida: International Association of Nitrox Divers. pp. 273–278. ISBN 978-0-915539-10-9.
- ^ a b c d e Citelli, Joe (August 2008). "24: The practical aspects of deep wreck diving". In Mount, Tom; Dituri, Joseph (eds.). Exploration and Mixed Gas Diving Encyclopedia (1st ed.). Miami Shores, Florida: International Association of Nitrox Divers. pp. 279–286. ISBN 978-0-915539-10-9.
- ^ A line trap refers to the situation where a line is laid between two points, but when taut, the line stretches through a narrower opening which the diver cannot swim through. With visibility this is not a problem as the diver can retrace his original route; but with a complete loss of visibility the diver would be unable to follow the line by touch alone back to the exit point.
- ^ Davis, Andy (7 August 2019). "Advanced Wreck Diving Techniques". scubatechphilippines.com. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
- ^ The technical diver training organisation, TDI, traditionally takes an open-minded and inclusive approach to different techniques. Notwithstanding this general principal, the TDI Advanced Wreck Diving manual describes progressive penetration as a "fairy tale method" (at page 26).
- ^ In 1992 two divers, Chris and Chrissy Rouse, died of decompression sickness after becoming trapped in the wreck whilst diving German submarine U-869 off the New Jersey coast, and then being unable to relocate their decompression gases after they escaped. The incident became famous after being chronicled in various books, including the New York Times best-selling book, Shadow Divers.
- ^ "Wreck Diving Safety Considerations". Latest Waikiki Scuba Dive Report. Kaimana Divers. Retrieved 6 March 2016.[permanent dead link]
- ^ Bruno, F.; Barbieri, L.; Muzzupappa, M.; Tusa, S.; Fresina, A.; Oliveri, F.; Lagudi, A.; Cozza, A.; Peluso, R. (2019). "Enhancing learning and access to Underwater Cultural Heritage through digital technologies: the case study of the "Cala Minnola" shipwreck site". Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. 13 e00103. doi:10.1016/j.daach.2019.e00103. S2CID 155526789.
- ^ Gentile, Gary (1994). Primary Wreck Diving Guide. USA: Gary Gentile Productions. pp. 25–57. ISBN 0-9621453-9-4.
- ^ "BBC Radio World Service Broadcast, "What Lies Beneath" First broadcast Friday 22 August 2008". Bbc.co.uk. 2008-08-22. Retrieved 2009-09-19.
- ^ "Blackbeard's Flagship - Archaeology Magazine Archive". Archive.archaeology.org. Retrieved 2015-09-17.
- ^ National Heritage Resources Act, no. 25 of 1999 (PDF). Pretoria: Government printer. 1999. Retrieved 27 December 2016 – via UNESCO.
- ^ Staff (2015). "MUCH Booklet 2015". www.sahra.org.za. South African Heritage Resources Agency. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
- ^ "Wrecks and Obstructions Database". www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov. Office of Coast Survey, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. U.S. Department of Commerce.
- ^ e.g. Souter, C. (2006). "Cultural Tourism and Diver Education.". In Staniforth, M.; Nash, M. (eds.). Maritime Archaeology: Australian Approaches. Springer Series in Underwater Archaeology. Springer, New York.
- ^ "Florida Panhandle Shipwreck Trail". Florida Panhandle Dive Trail.
- ^ Grussing, Valerie J. "Reanimating the Graveyard: Heritage Tourism Development of North Carolina Shipwrecks" (PDF). thescholarship.ecu.edu. Retrieved 18 July 2015.
- ^ "Monitor NMS - The Monitor Collection". Monitor.noaa.gov. 2003-07-26. Retrieved 2015-09-17.
- ^ Hudy, Paul. "North Carolina Shipwrecks". nc-wreckdiving.com. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
- ^ Mouli and Tika Greenlaw (1986-02-16). "Wreck Diving in the Marlborough Sounds New Zealand". Godive.co.nz. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- ^ "Mikhail Lermontov - The New Zealand Maritime Record - NZNMM". Nzmaritime.co.nz. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
- ^ Gentile, Gary (1 December 1994). Wreck Diving Adventures (1st ed.). Gary Gentile Productions. ISBN 978-1-883056-00-1.
I cannot state too often, the Great Lakes have the finest wreck diving the world.
- ^ A discussion of this is to be found in Kevin McMurray's book, Dark Descent, ISBN 0-7434-0063-1. He discusses how some older divers react poorly to use of the Andrea Doria as a training wreck, perceiving it as diminishing their achievements.
External links
[edit]- WRECKSITE Worldwide free database of + 65.000 wrecks with history, maritime charts and GPS positions (in English, German, French, and Dutch)
- NOAA Wrecks and Obstructions Database
- Sea Research Society
- Dangers of Wreck Diving
- Wreck Diving in the Graveyard of the Atlantic
Wreck diving
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Fundamentals
Core Characteristics of Wreck Diving
Wreck diving involves the recreational or technical exploration of submerged artificial structures, such as shipwrecks, aircraft, and artificial reefs formed from wreckage, using self-contained underwater breathing apparatus (SCUBA) or rebreathers.[8][5] Distinct from natural reef or open-water diving, it centers on human-made environments that offer historical artifacts, marine habitats, and structural complexity, often at depths ranging from shallow coastal sites to beyond 150 feet (46 meters) for advanced operations.[9][10] A defining feature is the overhead environment created by the wreck's superstructure, which restricts direct ascent to the surface and necessitates horizontal or downward navigation during penetration dives.[2] These are classified into non-penetration (external profiling to avoid interiors), limited penetration (shallow entries without silt disturbance risks), and full penetration (extensive internal exploration requiring technical skills and equipment).[5] Common hazards include entanglement in fishing lines, nets, or debris; silt-outs reducing visibility to near zero; unstable structures prone to collapse; sharp edges causing injury; and disorientation in low-light, labyrinthine interiors.[2][11] Effective wreck diving demands specialized skills such as precise buoyancy control to prevent stirring silt, proficiency in guideline deployment and reel management for orientation, controlled finning techniques to minimize disturbance, and enhanced situational awareness for buddy separation prevention.[4][12] Training standards from organizations like PADI and SDI require prerequisite advanced open-water certification, logged experience in similar dives, and instruction in safety protocols, including redundant lighting, cutting tools for entanglement, and strict no-touch policies for fragile sites.[13][14] Divers must plan meticulously, accounting for currents, depth limits, and gas reserves, as wrecks amplify risks compared to open environments due to confined spaces and potential for rapid task loading.[15][8]Distinction from Other Diving Forms
Wreck diving differs from general recreational scuba diving, which typically occurs in open water with direct access to the surface, by involving exploration of submerged artificial structures like shipwrecks that create overhead environments. These environments limit vertical ascent paths, necessitating advanced buoyancy control, navigation skills, and techniques such as using guideline reels to mitigate risks of disorientation, entanglement in debris or fishing gear, and structural hazards like sharp protrusions or unstable corrosion.[16][8] Organizations such as PADI classify wreck diving as a specialty course requiring at least 30 logged dives and open-water certification, emphasizing non-penetration surveys for recreational divers to avoid interior risks, unlike the free-swimming or drift patterns common in reef or wall dives.[17] In contrast to cave diving, which explores natural underwater cavities with uniform siltation and restricted light penetration, wreck diving targets man-made relics prone to mechanical failures, such as rusted bulkheads or fragmented hulls that can shift or collapse under diver contact. Both activities share overhead exposure demanding the "rule of thirds" for gas management and no direct surface emergency ascent, but wreck sites introduce variable geometries from human engineering, including confined compartments and potential biofouling layers that obscure visibility differently than cave sediments.[18] Cave training often mandates prior technical experience due to remoteness and homogeneity of passages, whereas recreational wreck diving prioritizes external profiling and limited penetration to depths under 18 meters (60 feet) without decompression obligations.[19] Wreck diving may overlap with technical diving when involving depths beyond 40 meters (130 feet), staged decompression, or mixed-gas breathing systems, but it is fundamentally site-specific rather than method-driven; technical diving extends recreational limits across any environment for extended bottom times, whereas wreck diving can remain within no-decompression limits for external observation only.[20][21] Unlike specialized pursuits such as underwater photography or night diving, which modify equipment or timing for documentation or ambiance without site-type constraints, wreck diving's core distinctions arise from the historical and material artifacts encountered, requiring awareness of legal protections against disturbance in many jurisdictions.[22]Historical Development
Pre-20th Century Origins
The practice of diving to shipwrecks predates modern scuba technology, originating in ancient breath-hold salvage efforts where freedivers recovered valuables from recently sunk vessels in shallow waters, such as Mediterranean wrecks looted for bronze artifacts and cargo during the Roman era.[23] These operations relied on human lung capacity, limiting depths to around 30 meters and durations to minutes, primarily driven by economic incentives rather than exploration. Evidence from archaeological sites indicates systematic post-sinking recovery by local divers, though records are sparse and often inferred from disturbed wreck sites rather than contemporary accounts. The introduction of diving bells in the 16th century marked a significant advancement, enabling prolonged subsurface work by trapping air in inverted containers lowered to wrecks. One early documented use occurred in 1531 near Rome, where a one-person diving bell facilitated salvage from a submerged site in Lake Nemi, allowing divers to extend operations beyond freediving limits.[23] By the late 17th century, these devices supported ambitious treasure recovery; in 1687, English captain William Phips employed a diving bell to salvage approximately 30 tons of silver, gold, and jewels worth over £200,000 from the Spanish galleon Nuestra Señora de la Concepción, wrecked in 1641 off the Dominican Republic.[24] This expedition, backed by British interests, demonstrated the feasibility of organized wreck diving for commercial gain, though risks from poor visibility, currents, and equipment failure remained high. In the 19th century, surface-supplied diving apparatus evolved wreck access further, with Augustus Siebe's 1837 closed-helmet suit enabling safer, deeper salvage on intact wrecks. Divers used these for operations like the partial recovery from HMS Royal George, sunk in 1782 off Spithead, where teams in the 1830s-1840s extracted cannons and stores from depths exceeding 20 meters.[25] Similarly, in 1836, John Deane's team applied early diving gear to probe the Tudor warship Mary Rose, sunk in 1545, recovering artifacts and mapping the site despite challenges from sediment and structural instability.[26] These efforts shifted wreck diving from opportunistic grabs to methodical surveys, laying groundwork for technical proficiency, though primarily motivated by salvage value over historical study. By the late 1800s, such diving supported harbor clearances and insurance recoveries, with divers navigating wreck interiors using hand signals and air hoses, prefiguring 20th-century recreational pursuits.[25]20th Century Expansion and Key Expeditions
The advent of self-contained underwater breathing apparatus in the 1940s marked a pivotal expansion in wreck diving capabilities. Jacques Cousteau and Émile Gagnan developed the Aqua-Lung in 1943, enabling divers to operate independently from surface-supplied air, which facilitated deeper and longer explorations of submerged wrecks previously limited by hard-hat diving gear.[27] Post-World War II, surplus military diving equipment became available to civilians, coinciding with a surge in recreational scuba interest during the 1950s and 1960s, as diving clubs proliferated and certification programs emerged.[28] This period saw wreck sites, particularly those from wartime losses, transform from salvage targets into accessible recreational and exploratory venues, with regions like the Great Lakes and Pacific atolls hosting increased dives to preserved hulls and artifacts.[15] Wreck diving techniques advanced through military salvage operations during the war, where U.S. Navy divers logged thousands of hours on sunken vessels, refining decompression methods and penetration protocols that later informed civilian practices.[29] By the mid-1950s, the sport's growth accelerated with the popularity of wetsuits and improved regulators, allowing divers to penetrate intact structures like freighters and submarines in depths up to 100 feet, though risks from entanglement and narcosis prompted early safety emphases in training.[30] The proliferation of artificial reefs from scuttled ships further expanded sites, drawing enthusiasts to historical wrecks in areas such as Florida Keys and the English Channel.[31] Notable expeditions underscored this era's exploratory zeal. In 1966, Michael DeCamp led the first recreational dives to the SS Andrea Doria, sunk in 1956 off Nantucket at 240 feet, establishing it as a benchmark for technical wreck penetration despite its hazardous conditions and subsequent diver fatalities.[32] Jacques Cousteau's team conducted a 1969 expedition to Truk Lagoon (now Chuuk), surveying over 100 Japanese WWII wrecks including aircraft carriers and destroyers, using the Calypso for filming and initial dives that highlighted marine encrustation and wartime relics.[33] Later, in 1985, Mel Fisher's 16-year search culminated in the location of the Nuestra Señora de Atocha, a 1622 Spanish galleon off Florida Keys, yielding artifacts valued at hundreds of millions, though primarily a salvage effort blending commercial and historical motives.[34] These ventures, documented by participants and naval records, demonstrated scuba's role in bridging recreational access with systematic wreck documentation, while underscoring persistent dangers like structural instability.[35]Post-2000 Technological and Exploratory Advances
Since the early 2000s, closed-circuit rebreathers (CCRs) have revolutionized technical wreck diving by enabling extended bottom times, minimal bubble emissions for reduced marine life disturbance, and access to previously unreachable depths without excessive decompression obligations.[36][37] These electronic systems, which recycle exhaled gas after CO2 scrubbing and O2 addition, gained traction in Europe and beyond as manufacturing improved reliability and user interfaces, with models like the Dräger Dolphin and later consumer adaptations facilitating safer penetration dives in overhead environments.[38] By 2010, CCR training programs from agencies such as PADI TecRec, launched in 2000, had standardized protocols for wreck applications, correlating with a documented increase in deep technical dives exceeding 200 meters.[39][40] Advanced mixed-gas protocols, including trimix and heliox, combined with algorithmic dive computers, further enhanced safety margins for high-risk wreck penetrations by mitigating narcosis and oxygen toxicity at depths beyond recreational limits.[41] These tools allowed divers to push envelopes, as evidenced by the 2022 record for the Milano wreck at 236 meters (774 feet), surpassing 1990s benchmarks like the Edmund Fitzgerald at 162 meters.[40] Integrated sensors in modern computers provide real-time gas analysis and predictive deco models, reducing accident rates in technical contexts where open-circuit scuba previously dominated.[42] ![Trevor Jackson returns from SS Kyogle wreck dive][float-right] Pre-dive site assessment benefited from high-resolution side-scan sonar and multibeam echosounders, which generate detailed seafloor bathymetry and backscatter imagery to pinpoint wreck locations and orientations, minimizing blind entries.[43][44] Post-2000 deployments, such as those by NOAA and commercial operators, facilitated discoveries like partially buried sites via water-column data analysis, enabling targeted diver expeditions to wrecks in shallow to intermediate depths.[45][46] Exploratory efforts leveraged hybrid technologies, including the Exosuit atmospheric diving suit tested in 2014 on the Antikythera wreck, permitting prolonged operations at 100+ meters without traditional decompression by maintaining surface pressure internally.[47][48] This enabled artifact recovery and mapping akin to dry-land archaeology, expanding access to fragile historical sites. Complementary autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) have supported diver-led surveys by creating 3D photogrammetric models, as in recent Mediterranean expeditions yielding intact ceramics from 2,000-year-old hulls.[49][50] These integrations have democratized wreck exploration, though reliance on diver skill persists for internal penetrations.[51]Motivations and Participant Perspectives
Recreational and Adventure Drivers
Recreational wreck diving appeals to divers seeking a blend of historical exploration, natural observation, and controlled adventure within accessible depths typically under 40 meters. Participants, often experienced with hundreds of prior dives, pursue these sites for the immersion in underwater relics that serve as artificial reefs teeming with marine biodiversity. A 2021 international survey of 724 wreck divers ranked viewing historically significant shipwrecks highest among motivations, with a mean score of 3.99 on a 5-point scale, closely followed by observing marine life at 3.94.[52] Artefacts and the peace found in these environments also scored highly, at 3.82 and 3.78 respectively, underscoring a preference for contemplative discovery over extreme risk.[52] The adventure element stems from navigating complex structures, where divers encounter unique challenges like entanglement hazards, sediment disturbance reducing visibility, and occasional currents, yet within parameters managed by training such as PADI's Wreck Diver specialty. Purpose-sunk vessels, cleared of dangers and positioned for multiple entry points, enable safe penetration or external surveys, heightening the thrill without necessitating technical equipment.[4] Sites like the Hilma Hooker, a 72-meter freighter intentionally scuttled off Bonaire in 1984 at depths of 18 to 30 meters, illustrate this draw, attracting shore-based divers to its intact hull and surrounding reef ecosystem.[53] While wreck penetration ranked lower in motivational appeal (mean 3.28), it contributes to the sense of exploration for a subset of recreational divers, balanced by strong attitudes favoring site protection, including penalties for artefact removal (mean 4.00).[52] This reflects a participant base—predominantly male (74%), aged 35-64, and highly educated—that values sustainable access over exploitation, with 34% frequently engaging in wreck dives.[52] Overall, these drivers position recreational wreck diving as an enriching extension of scuba pursuits, fostering personal achievement through skillful interaction with submerged history and ecology.Scientific and Historical Research Aims
Wreck diving facilitates underwater archaeological investigations aimed at documenting and interpreting submerged cultural heritage sites, including shipwrecks that preserve evidence of historical maritime activities, trade networks, and naval engagements.[54] Researchers employ diving techniques to conduct non-invasive surveys, artifact recovery, and site mapping, enabling reconstruction of past economic systems and vessel construction methods from eras predating modern records.[55] For instance, the U.S. Navy's Underwater Archaeology Branch oversees documentation of over 3,000 shipwrecks and 17,000 aircraft remains, prioritizing preservation to inform military history and human adaptation to maritime environments without destructive excavation.[54] These efforts distinguish wreck diving from recreational pursuits by emphasizing archival cross-referencing with dive data to verify wreck identities and contextualize events, such as losses during conflicts or explorations.[56] Scientifically, wreck diving supports studies of shipwrecks as artificial reefs, where researchers quantify biodiversity, species recruitment, and ecological succession to evaluate habitat enhancement versus natural reef dynamics.[57] Empirical assessments reveal that such structures often host elevated biomasses of reef-associated fish and invertebrates, functioning as aggregation points for predators and refugia for smaller organisms, though outcomes vary by wreck age, material composition, and location.[58] A 2023 review of shipwreck ecology highlights aims to model trophic interactions and biofouling processes, using diver-collected samples and remote sensing to test hypotheses on how iron and concrete substrates influence algal and coral colonization rates compared to rocky bottoms.[57] Environmental research via wreck diving targets pollution legacies, including heavy metal leaching and hydrocarbon releases from degrading hulls, with dives enabling in-situ monitoring of contaminant dispersion and bioavailability in sediments.[59] Studies document cases where wrecks act as vectors for invasive species, potentially altering local food webs, while also assessing mitigation strategies like epoxy coatings to curb oil spills—evidenced by ongoing evaluations of World War II-era vessels leaking pollutants into surrounding ecosystems.[59] These investigations prioritize causal mechanisms, such as corrosion-induced structural failures, over correlative observations, informing policy on wreck removal thresholds based on empirical toxicity thresholds rather than precautionary assumptions.[57]Commercial and Salvage Interests
Commercial salvage operations in wreck diving focus on recovering economic value from submerged vessels, including cargo, scrap metals, and artifacts, often conducted by specialized companies using professional divers, remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), and saturation diving systems to access depths beyond recreational limits. These efforts are driven by profit motives, with salvors seeking rewards under maritime law for successful recovery, typically 10-50% of the property's value based on risk, skill, and expense incurred.[60] In contrast to scientific or recreational pursuits, commercial interests prioritize marketable commodities, such as non-ferrous metals from warships or bullion from treasure ships, funding extensive searches and legal battles over rights. Historical examples illustrate the scale of these endeavors. At Scapa Flow in Orkney, Scotland, post-World War I salvagers, including Ernest Cox's operations from 1923 to 1939, raised 44 of the 52 scuttled German High Seas Fleet vessels, recovering over 120,000 tons of steel and bronze guns sold to foundries, generating substantial revenue amid Britain's industrial needs.[61] Similarly, treasure-focused salvages have yielded high returns; Mel Fisher's consortium, after 16 years of systematic seabed searches off Florida, located the 1622 wreck of the Spanish galleon Nuestra Señora de Atocha on July 20, 1985, extracting 114,000 silver "pieces of eight," 200 gold bars totaling 160 pounds, and emeralds appraised at over $450 million in total value, with proceeds shared after court-awarded salvage rights.[62] Modern commercial wreck diving extends to contract-based removals for navigational safety and environmental compliance, where firms like Global Diving & Salvage undertake operations such as refloating barges or dismantling hazardous hulks, often reimbursed by insurers or governments. For instance, the 2012 grounding of the Costa Concordia off Italy prompted a $1.5 billion salvage by Titan Salvage and Microart, involving parbuckling the 114,000-ton wreck in 2014 to prevent oil spills, with recovery costs offset by hull insurance.[63] On historic sites like the RMS Titanic, RMS Titanic Inc. has recovered 5,500+ artifacts across expeditions from 1987 to 2010, including propellers and deck machinery, generating millions through museum exhibitions while holding exclusive U.S. admiralty court-granted salvage title since 1994.[64] Legal frameworks underpin these interests but impose constraints. Under international maritime salvage conventions like the 1989 London Salvage Convention, voluntary salvors of imperiled property earn awards, yet cultural heritage protections—such as the U.S. Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987, which vests title to pre-1988 historic wrecks in state waters to the states—require permits and limit commercial exploitation to avoid "looting" claims.[65] Conflicts arise when national sovereignty overrides salvage rights, as in Spain's 2012 reclamation of the Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes treasure from Odyssey Marine Exploration, valued at $500 million but repatriated as cultural patrimony despite the salvor's $72 million investment.[66] These regulations reflect tensions between economic incentives and preservation, with commercial operators often navigating admiralty courts to secure claims on abandoned wrecks.Classification and Variations
By Depth and Accessibility
Wreck dives are classified by depth ranges that determine physiological demands, gas requirements, and requisite diver certifications, thereby influencing accessibility for recreational versus technical practitioners. Shallow wrecks, situated at depths of 18 meters (60 feet) or less, remain within the limits of basic open-water certification, enabling novice divers to explore without advanced equipment or decompression obligations.[67] These sites minimize risks like nitrogen narcosis and oxygen toxicity, relying on standard compressed air, and often feature intact structures conducive to external surveys.[68] ![Diver exploring the Hilma Hooker wreck][float-right] Intermediate-depth wrecks, between 18 and 40 meters (60 to 130 feet), demand advanced open-water or deep-diver specialties, as pressures exceed recreational no-decompression limits and necessitate enriched nitrox to extend bottom time.[67] Accessibility here requires buoyancy control to avoid entanglement in debris and awareness of moderated narcosis effects, with many training agencies recommending prior deep-dive experience for wrecks exceeding 18 meters to mitigate depth-related impairments. [69] Deep and ultra-deep wrecks, beyond 40 meters (130 feet), fall under technical diving protocols, accessible only to certified trimix or rebreather users trained in staged decompression and hypoxic gas management.[20] [70] These profiles involve mandatory decompression stops, often exceeding 30 minutes, and demand redundant gas supplies due to elevated risks of task loading from poor visibility and structural complexity.[70] Agencies like SSI certify technical wreck divers for depths up to 100 meters (328 feet) using hypoxic trimix, underscoring the specialized skills barrier that restricts participation to experienced professionals.[70] Accessibility is further constrained by logistical factors, such as liveaboard operations for remote sites and extended surface intervals, contrasting with shore-accessible shallow wrecks that support day trips for broader diver cohorts.[21]By Wreck Orientation and Condition
Wreck dives are classified by the orientation of the sunken vessel, which determines the spatial challenges posed to divers, including buoyancy control, navigation, and entanglement risks. Upright wrecks, where the vessel rests in its natural vertical position with decks horizontal, represent a minority of sites due to the physics of sinking, which often causes rolling or capsizing from instability during descent.[71] These configurations facilitate more intuitive orientation, as gravity aligns with familiar deck levels, reducing disorientation compared to tilted structures.[72] Side-lying or listing wrecks, common outcomes of partial flooding leading to beam exposure on the seabed, transform horizontal decks into vertical walls, compelling divers to "walk" on bulkheads and complicating buoyancy management to avoid scraping against protrusions.[73] Inverted or turtled wrecks, where the vessel flips fully upside down, invert the internal environment such that former ceilings become floors, heightening overhead exposure and requiring precise trim control to prevent inversion-induced loss of spatial awareness.[72] Vertical orientations, rare and typically resulting from structural failure like mast-like remnants or deliberate scuttling, demand specialized ascent techniques due to the chimney-like profile.[73] Classification by condition assesses structural integrity, influencing penetration feasibility and hazard levels from corrosion, biofouling, and mechanical degradation. Intact wrecks, often recent sinkings with minimal fragmentation, offer stable frameworks for exploration, though sharp edges persist from fabrication.[74] Broken or parted wrecks, split by impact, currents, or explosives, feature disconnected sections that increase silting and disorientation risks during transit between debris fields.[73] Heavily deteriorated or collapsed conditions, prevalent in older wrecks subjected to decades of electrolytic corrosion and sediment loading, compromise overhead stability, elevating collapse potential and entanglement in decayed wiring or plating.[2] For instance, surveys of the RMS Andrea Doria, sunk in 1956, document progressive pancaking of decks and superstructure dissolution by 2025, rendering penetration untenable without advanced risk assessment.[75] Divers must evaluate these factors pre-dive via sonar or ROV inspections to match skills against site-specific causal hazards like surge-induced instability in compromised structures.[2]External Survey Versus Internal Penetration
External survey in wreck diving confines activities to the exterior surfaces of submerged vessels, enabling divers to map structural features, assess integrity, and document artifacts without entering enclosed spaces. This approach minimizes entanglement risks from debris and wiring, allows for natural light penetration in shallower zones, and permits direct ascent to the surface in emergencies, making it suitable for recreational divers with basic wreck certification. [1] [2] In contrast, internal penetration involves navigating into the wreck's compartments, holds, or passageways, often requiring artificial lighting, guideline deployment, and staged decompression due to the overhead environment that blocks direct surface access. Penetration dives heighten hazards such as silt disturbance leading to zero-visibility conditions, structural entrapment from collapsed bulkheads or rusted protrusions, and disorientation within labyrinthine interiors, where navigation challenges parallel those in cave diving. [2] [76] Full penetration, extending deep into the vessel, represents the most perilous variant, with documented incidents attributing fatalities to out-of-air scenarios exacerbated by restricted mobility and extended gas consumption. [77] Techniques for external surveys emphasize buoyancy control for precise contour following, photographic documentation of hull markings or propeller details, and hazard identification like fishing line entanglements or sharp edges, often culminating in sketched site maps for future reference. Penetration protocols demand redundant gas sources, such as stage cylinders, team-based entry with designated reel tenders, and emergency cut-away procedures for snagged lines, as overhead restrictions amplify the consequences of equipment failure or panic-induced errors. [2] [78] Certification standards reflect these disparities: external survey courses, offered by organizations like NAUI, focus on risk minimization through external-only practice and require advanced open-water prerequisites, while internal penetration mandates technical endorsements from bodies such as TDI, incorporating skills like valve drills and simulated lost-line drills to address the causal chain of failures—from silt-out to navigation loss—that empirical incident analyses link to the majority of wreck fatalities. [1] Divers Alert Network data underscores that while external dives rarely exceed standard decompression limits, penetration often necessitates mixed-gas protocols to mitigate narcosis in depths averaging 30-50 meters for advanced sites. [2]Operational Techniques
Pre-Dive Planning and Site Assessment
Pre-dive planning in wreck diving emphasizes systematic evaluation to address site-specific risks, including entanglement in rigging, structural instability, and navigational challenges within confined spaces. Divers begin by compiling data on the wreck's location, depth, dimensions, and orientation from nautical charts, hydrographic surveys, and historical documentation, often cross-referencing with sonar mappings or ROV inspections for accuracy.[79] This step identifies entry points, potential penetration routes, and overall site layout, ensuring alignment with divers' certification levels and experience, such as limiting non-penetration dives to external surveys for novices.[10] Site assessment focuses on hazard identification through pre-dive reconnaissance, evaluating factors like prevailing currents (which can exceed 2 knots in some coastal wrecks), sediment composition prone to silt-outs reducing visibility to under 1 meter, and biofouling or corrosion compromising structural integrity.[2][10] For deeper sites beyond 18 meters, assessments incorporate decompression obligations and narcosis risks, with tools like multibeam echosounders used to detect overhangs or debris fields. Contaminated wrecks, such as those with residual fuel or munitions, require specialized risk evaluations including atmospheric testing analogs and decontamination protocols.[80] Environmental conditions form a critical layer, with forecasts for tide cycles, wave heights under 1 meter for safe boat operations, and visibility predictions derived from water column data. Legal compliance is verified, including permits for protected heritage sites under frameworks like the UNESCO Convention, alongside insurance reviews for salvage or penetration liabilities.[81][82] Dive profiles are modeled using software or tables accounting for gas mixes (e.g., EANx for shallower wrecks or trimix for depths over 30 meters), surface air consumption rates adjusted by 10-20% for task loading, and no-decompression limits per standards like those from TDI/SDI. Contingency planning outlines lost-line procedures, redundant light sources, and surface support with emergency oxygen at 100% for decompression illness response. Team briefings cover roles, hand signals, and abort criteria, such as current shifts exceeding planned velocities.[10][83]- Key Planning Checklist:
- Verify wreck stability via recent surveys (e.g., no recent seismic activity).[79]
- Calculate reserves: Minimum 50% gas for ascent and deco in overhead environments.[2]
- Simulate penetration in shallow water if unfamiliar with site.
- Assess diver fitness: No recent dives exceeding 40 meters without acclimation.[82]
