Hubbry Logo
Canadian AmericansCanadian AmericansMain
Open search
Canadian Americans
Community hub
Canadian Americans
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Canadian Americans
Canadian Americans
Canadian Americans
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A French-Canadian family from Montréal in 1913

Key Information

Canadian Americans (French: Américains canadiens) are American citizens (or in some uses residents) whose ancestry is wholly or partly Canadian, or citizens of either country who hold dual citizenship.[3] Today, many Canadian Americans hold both US and Canadian citizenship.

The term Canadian can mean a nationality or an ethnicity. Canadians are considered North Americans due their residing in the North American continent. English-speaking Canadian immigrants easily integrate and assimilate into northern and western U.S. states as a result of many cultural similarities, and in the similar accent in spoken English.[4] French Canadians, because of language and culture, tend to take longer to assimilate.[5] However, by the 3rd generation, they are often fully culturally assimilated, and the Canadian identity is more or less folklore.[6] This took place, even though half of the population of the province of Quebec emigrated to the US between 1840 and 1930.[7] Many New England cities formed 'Little Canadas', but many of these have gradually disappeared.

This cultural "invisibility" within the larger US population is seen as creating stronger affinity among Canadians living in the US than might otherwise exist.[8] According to US Census estimates, the number of Canadian residents was around 640,000 in 2000.[9] Some sources have cited the number to possibly be over 1,000,000.[10] This number, though, is far smaller than the number of Americans who can trace part or the whole of their ancestry to Canada. The percentage of these in the New England states is almost 25% of the total population.

In some regions of the United States, especially New England or the Midwest, a Canadian American often means one whose ancestors came from Canada.[11]

American cities founded by or named after Canadians

[edit]

Canadian American Day

[edit]

The Connecticut State Senate unanimously passed a bill in 2009, making June 24 Canadian American Day in the state of Connecticut. The bill allows state officials to hold ceremonies at the capitol and other places each year to honor Americans of Canadian ancestry.[13]

Aboriginal Canadian Americans

[edit]

As a consequence of Article 3 of the Jay Treaty of 1794, official First Nations status, or in the United States, Native American status, also confers the right to live and work on either side of the border. Unlike the U.S., Canada has not codified the Jay Treaty. Canadian courts readily reject the Jay Treaty free passage of goods right.[14]

Study

[edit]

Some institutions in the United States focus on Canadian-American studies, including the Canadian-American Center at the University of Maine,[15] the Center for Canadian American studies at Western Washington University,[16] and the University at Buffalo Canadian-American Studies Committee.[17]

Notable people

[edit]
For a more comprehensive list, see List of Canadian Americans.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Canadian Americans

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Canadian Americans are residents of the United States who are either immigrants from Canada or descendants of such immigrants, forming one of the smaller foreign-origin groups in the country due to historical patterns of northward and southward cross-border movement rather than mass unidirectional settlement. This population encompasses both English-speaking Canadians drawn by economic prospects and French Canadians who migrated en masse to New England's textile mills and factories between the 1840s and 1930s, often comprising half of Quebec's provincial population during peak decades. Unlike larger immigrant cohorts from distant regions, Canadian Americans have assimilated rapidly owing to linguistic, cultural, and institutional similarities with the U.S., resulting in minimal distinct ethnic enclaves today beyond pockets of Franco-American communities in states like Maine and Massachusetts. Post-World War II migration added professionals and skilled workers, sustaining a modest inflow that grew by only 4 percent from 2010 to 2023 amid broader U.S. immigrant expansion, with Canadian-born residents numbering around 800,000 in recent years. This group has disproportionately influenced American entertainment, sports, and innovation, with Canadian expatriates like actors Jim Carrey and Michael J. Fox achieving prominence in Hollywood, reflecting Canada's outsized "brain export" in creative industries despite the U.S.'s larger market. Economically, early waves filled labor demands in manufacturing and logging, while modern contributions include cross-border business ties facilitated by NAFTA and its successors, underscoring causal links between geographic proximity and low-friction integration. No major controversies define the group, though historical tensions arose from divided loyalties during events like the American Revolution, when many Canadian loyalists opted to remain under British rule rather than join the rebellion. Overall, Canadian Americans exemplify seamless bilateral fusion, with shared North American identity often eclipsing national origins in self-perception and societal role.

Definition and Scope

Terminology and Historical Context

Canadian Americans are defined as U.S. citizens or residents with full or partial ancestry from Canada, encompassing Canadian-born individuals who have naturalized as well as their descendants who self-report such heritage in census . This empirical designation prioritizes verifiable lineage and citizenship status over subjective cultural identities, reflecting migrations primarily motivated by economic prospects rather than ideological or ethnic assertions. The term gained prominence in the late during waves of labor migration, particularly French-Canadians from seeking in mills, where for workers amid industrialization drew over ,000 across the between and 1930. These movements were causal outcomes of differentials and job , unencumbered by formal barriers to the undefended U.S.- established in 1818. This contrasts with 18th-century reverse migrations of Loyalists—estimated at to 60,000—who fled to post-American due to loyalty to the Crown, shaping early Canadian demographics but distinct from the later, economically driven U.S.-bound flows. Proximity across the contiguous land border, combined with shared British colonial heritage (Anglo-Protestant or French Catholic), facilitated assimilation, as most migrants spoke English or French dialects compatible with U.S. regional vernaculars, enabling quicker socioeconomic incorporation than groups separated by oceanic distances or profound linguistic divides. Recent U.S. Census American Community Survey estimates indicate around 828,000 Canadian-born residents in 2023, with self-reported Canadian ancestry claimed by approximately 1 million individuals, underscoring persistent but modest cross-border ties.

Distinction from Other Immigrant Groups

Canadian immigrants to the United States experience fewer assimilation barriers than many other immigrant groups due to shared linguistic foundations, with English predominant in both nations. In 2019, only 3 percent of Canadian-born individuals ages 5 and older reported limited English proficiency, in stark contrast to 46 percent among all immigrants overall. This near-universal proficiency—coupled with familiarity with English-speaking norms—reduces the cultural and communicative obstacles often encountered by immigrants from non-English-dominant regions, such as Latin America, where limited proficiency exceeds 50 percent in many cohorts. In terms of migration drivers, Canadian entrants are economically selective, skewing toward skilled and professional roles rather than low-wage labor common in flows from developing economies. A significant portion enters via the TN nonimmigrant classification under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which facilitates temporary work for qualified Canadians in predefined occupations like , scientific , and . This pathway aligns with broader patterns where Canadian immigrants cluster in high-skill sectors, evidenced by their overrepresentation in , , , and fields compared to the general immigrant labor . These factors contribute to a distinct integration , marked by rapid and minimal reliance on assistance, challenging assumptions of a monolithic "immigrant " that emphasizes hardship across origins. occurs at rates around 50 percent, the immigrant but accelerated by the lack of foundational divides in and compatibility.

Historical Migration Patterns

Pre-20th Century Movements

Pre-20th century migrations of to the were primarily driven by economic opportunities in American industry and , with significant flows beginning in the mid-19th century. from sought in New England's burgeoning mills, where labor demands pulled workers southward amid industrialization in . Between 1840 and 1900, this migration contributed to the growth of French Canadian populations in states like and , forming ethnic enclaves known as "Little Canadas." By 1900, New England's French Canadian had increased from 37,000 in 1860 to 573,000, reflecting the scale of this industrial migration. Push factors in Canada included land scarcity and restrictive policies that hindered farm expansion, particularly in Quebec where overpopulation, debt, and infertile soils displaced many rural families. In contrast, English-speaking farmers from Ontario migrated to the American Midwest, attracted by the U.S. Homestead Act of 1862, which granted 160 acres of public land to settlers for a nominal fee after five years of residency and improvement. This legislation facilitated agricultural settlement, drawing Canadian farmers facing similar land limitations in Upper Canada due to tenure systems and economic pressures. U.S. Census from recorded approximately 1.187 million Canadian-born , comprising 747,000 English-speaking and ,000 French-speaking individuals, marking the peak of pre-20th century inflows. These movements were largely temporary or seasonal for some, but many established permanent communities, prioritizing economic gain over cultural ties. Overall, from to , an estimated ,000 French alone had emigrated, underscoring the pull of U.S. wages and against Canadian constraints.

20th Century Waves

Migration from Canada to the United States peaked in the early 20th century, with 708,715 arrivals between 1910 and 1919 and a record 949,286 from 1920 to 1929, driven primarily by economic opportunities in U.S. manufacturing and higher wages rather than political factors. These waves included substantial numbers of French Canadians seeking industrial jobs in New England textile mills and Midwest factories, contributing to nearly 900,000 French Canadian emigrants overall from 1840 to 1930. The influx reflected U.S. economic expansion outpacing Canada's, as American industrial growth pulled laborers across the open border. The curtailed flows to 162,703 , coinciding with the Canadian that devastated prairie , particularly in , prompting internal migrations but limited cross-border movement due to synchronized economic hardship in both nations. Post-World War II recovery spurred a , with 353,169 migrants and 433,128 , as U.S. postwar and job attracted skilled workers. A notable "" of professionals marked the mid-20th century, with losing 60,230 individuals in , technical, managerial, and entrepreneurial roles to the U.S. between 1954 and 1967, motivated by superior prospects and . This trend intensified in the 1960s amid precursors to formalized skilled migration preferences, paralleling Quebec's (1960–1966), where and modernization pushed some francophone professionals southward for opportunities aligning with broader North American economic shifts, rather than ideological flight. Overall, these movements underscored causal pulls from U.S. GDP advantages, sustained by higher and growth compared to throughout the century.

Post-2000 Trends and NAFTA Effects

The (NAFTA), implemented on , , enhanced cross-border labor mobility by introducing the TN visa category, which allows qualified Canadian professionals in designated —such as engineers, , and economists—to work temporarily without labor requirements. This provision facilitated increased temporary professional flows, particularly in sectors like and healthcare, offsetting declines in permanent migration by easier access for high-skilled workers compared to more restrictive H-1B visas. Empirical indicate NAFTA's correlated with integrated North American supply chains, indirectly supporting such mobility, though causation on migration volumes remains debated to confounding economic factors. Post-2000, permanent migration from to the exhibited a marked decline, with the number of Canadian-born individuals granted U.S. dropping approximately % from the late to the late , according to of U.S. . This trend leveled off in the mid-2010s to early , reflecting net losses stabilizing amid 's high from other regions, but skilled emigration persisted, driven by differentials in economic opportunities. 's comparatively high marginal tax rates—such as Ontario's top combined rate applying at CAD 253,414 versus over CAD 1.3 million in California—have contributed to this "brain drain," particularly among high earners in innovation-driven fields, as evidenced by reports on talent attraction gaps. The decline in permanent residencies has been partially compensated by rising temporary professional entries via TN visas, with Canadian workers concentrating in U.S. tech and health sectors where demand for specialized skills outpaces domestic supply. Canada's stagnant innovation output, reflected in lower patent filings relative to GDP—where it accounts for only 1.3% of OECD triadic patents despite over 3% of GDP share—contrasts with U.S. dynamism, providing a causal pull for skilled migrants seeking higher productivity environments. Post-COVID developments, including expanded remote work, have enabled some Canadians to access U.S. jobs without full relocation, though regulatory restrictions on cross-border remote employment for foreign employers limit widespread migration shifts. Overall, these patterns underscore policy-induced outflows, with Canada's fiscal burdens and innovation lags empirically linked to sustained professional mobility southward.

Demographics and Distribution

Population Estimates and Ancestry Data

As of 2023, the Canadian-born stood at approximately 828,000 individuals, for less than 2 percent of the nation's total foreign-born residents of 47.8 million. This number reflects growth, increasing by just 4 percent from levels, in contrast to the substantial inflows from Asian and Latin American that have propelled the overall foreign-born to expand by over 50 percent since 2000. Naturalization among Canadian-born immigrants remains moderate, with 51 percent having acquired U.S. citizenship by 2023, aligning closely with the 52 percent rate across all immigrant groups. The demographic profile skews older, featuring a median age of 55 years—elevated compared to 47 for the broader immigrant population and 37 for U.S.-born residents—which underscores an aging cohort including retirees. Migration inflows from Canada have decelerated since the late 2000s, with the annual average of Canadian-born individuals granted U.S. permanent residency dropping 30 percent through the late 2010s amid stricter U.S. immigration policies and economic factors reducing net outflows from Canada. Overall, the Canadian-born segment has remained stable over four decades, hovering near 800,000–850,000 since 1980, unlike the exponential growth in other foreign-born categories. Self-reported Canadian ancestry in U.S. surveys exceeds foreign-born figures, with over 1 million individuals claiming it in recent American Community Survey data, though such responses often encompass multi-generational descendants rather than first-generation immigrants.

Geographic Concentrations

California hosts the largest share of Canadian-born residents in the United States, accounting for 12 percent of the total as of 2023, followed by Florida, New York, Michigan, and Washington state, each with approximately 6 percent. These five states together represent a significant portion of the roughly 828,000 Canadian immigrants nationwide.
StateShare of Canadian Immigrants (2023)
12%
6%
New York6%
6%
Washington6%
Concentrations are particularly evident in metropolitan areas proximate to major job centers and border crossings, including in —linked to the dense Detroit-Windsor trade corridor—and in Washington, near . New York and also feature notable urban clusters, driven by professional opportunities in and . 's presence, centered around , reflects retiree patterns in warmer Sunbelt regions, where Canadian seasonal residents contribute to local economies. A of Canadian Americans reside in states adjacent to or within short of the Canadian , underscoring the influence of geographic proximity on settlement patterns and ongoing cross-border interactions. from recent years further indicate high intermarriage rates among those of Canadian ancestry, with over 70 percent of marriages involving non-Canadian-born spouses, signaling widespread assimilation into broader U.S. populations.

Socioeconomic Profiles

Canadian-born individuals in the United States, comprising a significant portion of those identifying with Canadian ancestry, exhibit elevated socioeconomic attainment relative to the national . According to 2023 , their stood at $104,300, surpassing the $77,600 for U.S.-born households and the $78,700 for all immigrant households, reflecting approximately a 34% premium over U.S.-born levels. This disparity aligns with self-selection among migrants, who often possess skills and qualifications that capitalize on higher U.S. structures and economic opportunities unavailable or less remunerative in Canada. Educational attainment further underscores this profile, with 53% of Canadian immigrants aged 25 and older holding a or higher in 2023, compared to 36% of the U.S.-born and 35% of immigrants overall. Overrepresentation in high-skill sectors is evident, as 70% of employed Canadian immigrants occupied , , , , or roles in 2023, exceeding rates for both native-born and broader immigrant groups; these include concentrations in , , and healthcare, facilitated by pathways like the TN visa under the USMCA for qualified professionals from Canada. Dependency metrics reinforce economic self-sufficiency, with a poverty rate of 9% among Canadian immigrants in 2023, below the 12% for U.S.-born and 14% for all immigrants, indicating minimal reliance on assistance programs. Compared to other European-ancestry groups, Canadian Americans demonstrate superior outcomes in and , attributable to recent migration selectivity favoring skilled workers drawn by U.S. market dynamics rather than broad historical assimilation patterns.

Cultural and Identity Aspects

Similarities to American Culture

Canadian Americans share foundational cultural elements with native-born , including Anglo-Protestant historical that underpin similar ethical frameworks emphasizing hard work and community . Geographic proximity along the world's longest undefended facilitates rapid cultural convergence, with English-language dominance seamless integration in communication and social norms; over 90% of Canadian immigrants to the U.S. are English-proficient upon arrival, native linguistic patterns. This proximity-driven overlap manifests in shared , as Canadian-born individuals in the U.S. continue patterns of heavy with American television, film, and digital , which dominates cross-border flows and aligns closely with U.S. native habits. Core values exhibit empirical alignment, particularly in and ; a 2004 Pew Research Center survey found 63% of and 65% of agreeing that depends on personal effort rather than external factors, a perspective that persists among Canadian Americans who adapt to U.S. in and social spheres. reinforces this, with immigrants from —often highly skilled and culturally proximate—showing business rates that or exceed U.S. natives, as evidenced by their propensity to co-found startups with American partners at higher rates than migrants from more distant origins. Consumerism patterns converge similarly, with Canadian Americans participating in the same retail, fast-food, and brand ecosystems as natives, driven by identical market influences across the border. The notion of as inherently more polite than —often invoked to highlight supposed divergences—is a superficial lacking robust empirical support; studies of use and reveal no statistically significant differences in everyday courtesy metrics, such as apology or , between the two groups. engagement underscores this uniformity, with Canadian Americans actively participating in hockey and alongside natives, bolstered by integrated like the NHL and MLB that draw talent and fans from both nations without cultural . These overlaps debunk claims of deep-seated divergence, attributing any minor variances to transient adaptations rather than fundamental traits.

Distinct Canadian Influences and Retention

Canadian Americans maintain few distinct cultural markers from Canada, owing to the profound similarities between the two nations' English-speaking, Western societies, which facilitate rapid assimilation. Empirical studies on immigrant integration indicate that English-proficient groups from culturally proximate origins, such as Canadians, exhibit higher rates of linguistic and social blending in the US compared to non-English speakers or those from distant cultures. By the third generation, self-identification with Canadian heritage often fades, with intermarriage rates among descendants exceeding 70% in recent decades, accelerating cultural dilution. Culinary retentions are minor and localized, primarily in border-adjacent communities where items like poutine—fries topped with cheese curds and gravy—appear in diners influenced by Quebecois migrants, though widespread adoption remains limited outside expat enclaves. Similarly, Tim Hortons doughnuts (timbits) evoke nostalgia among recent arrivals but lack broad institutional presence, with US chains rarely replicating the brand's ubiquity north of the border. Observance of uniquely Canadian holidays, such as Canada Day on July 1, is sporadic and confined to informal gatherings in high-density areas like Michigan or Washington state, rather than formalized community events. Sports loyalty offers a partial exception, with many Canadian expatriates retaining allegiance to National Hockey League teams from their provinces of origin, even while residing in markets; for instance, fans from or often prioritize or games over local franchises. Accent retention is negligible, as —marked by subtle "raising" of diphthongs in words like "about"—overlaps heavily with Midwestern American varieties, leading to quick convergence upon relocation. The stereotype of Canadian "politeness," exemplified by frequent use of "sorry," has drawn as a veneer of passive-aggression, potentially masking underlying toward US economic superiority and cultural hegemony, which Canadians historically navigate through understated rather than overt . This behavioral trait, while culturally ingrained, diminishes in subsequent generations amid American norms favoring directness. Overall, underscore low retention, with first-generation influences largely evaporating by the grandchildren's to endogamy avoidance and societal pressures for .

Political Orientations and Views on Key Issues

Canadian emigrants to the United States are often self-selected for traits favoring economic liberty, lower taxation, and reduced regulatory interference, contrasting with Canada's higher fiscal burdens and interventionist policies that contribute to ongoing brain drain. Analyses attribute this outflow of skilled professionals to longstanding Canadian fiscal and regulatory frameworks, initiated under Pierre Trudeau and continued under subsequent governments, which impose marginal tax rates exceeding 50% in some provinces and stringent business regulations perceived as hindering innovation and mobility. This pattern implies that Canadian Americans lean more rightward on economic issues than the broader Canadian populace, which supports expansive social programs and redistribution. On healthcare, Canadian Americans frequently express preferences for the U.S. system's accessibility over Canada's universal model, citing empirical dissatisfaction with long wait times and limited primary care access north of the border—only 15% of Canadians reported satisfaction with care access in 2022, compared to 29% of Americans. Surveys further reveal Canadians hold more negative overall views of their healthcare system than Americans do of theirs, with migration exposing individuals to faster U.S. treatment options that debunk assumptions of Canadian superiority in equity-driven delivery. Regarding gun rights, while Canadians broadly favor stricter controls—66% supported tighter laws in 2021 versus 60% of Americans—Canadian Americans, through immersion in U.S. environments with higher self-defense emphases, often adapt to more permissive stances reflective of Second Amendment priorities. On multiculturalism, Canadian Americans display less ideological fervor than segments of the U.S. left, with post-migration assimilation fostering elevated American patriotism; comparative studies indicate U.S. civic integration pressures yield stronger national attachment among immigrants than Canada's multiculturalism, which prioritizes group retention over unified identity. Causal exposure to U.S. meritocracy—evident in higher post-tax earnings and entrepreneurial success—reinforces shifts away from Canadian equity-focused paradigms, as migrants directly observe outcomes tied to individual effort rather than systemic leveling.

Indigenous Canadian Americans

Cross-Border Indigenous Histories

Prior to European contact, indigenous nations including the (Iroquois Confederacy, particularly the Mohawk) and () held traditional territories extending across the land later demarcated as the , supporting fluid seasonal movements for , gathering, warfare, and kinship-based without regard to fixed national divisions. These patterns arose from empirical necessities—tracking game migrations, exploiting seasonal resources, and maintaining alliances—demonstrating adaptive strategies grounded in environmental realities rather than ideological displacements. The European fur trade, spanning the 17th to mid-19th centuries, amplified such cross-regional mobility as indigenous trappers, guides, and middlemen pursued economic gains by following beaver populations and accessing trading posts on both sides of nascent colonial frontiers. Ojibwe and allied groups, for instance, reoriented established networks to supply pelts for European markets, often relocating families or bands to optimize access to furs, tools, and firearms, reflecting calculated opportunism amid fluctuating commodity demands rather than coerced flight. This commerce integrated indigenous agency into transcontinental exchanges, with voyagers paddling routes that disregarded emerging boundaries for profit-driven ends. By the , as yields declined and colonial settlements intensified, targeted migrations occurred, such as bands from Canadian Pembina bands moving southward into U.S. around the Mountains to sustain and adapt to new economic niches like mixed farming and labor. from 1882 note at least 75 individuals from Canadian Turtle Mountain groups crossing near Pembina, joining kin through pragmatic resource-seeking, underscoring causal drivers of preservation over narratives of victimhood. These flows formed a small historical of Canadian First Nations integrating into American indigenous contexts, prioritizing tangible incentives like viability and territorial abundance. The Jay Treaty of 1794, formally the between and the , includes Article III, which guarantees that "Indians of the British territories" (now interpreted as Canadian-born American Indians) may pass and repass the U.S. border freely, engage in and , and reside or work in the without restriction on personal effects or goods for personal use. This provision, rooted in pre-colonial indigenous mobility across the unpartitioned , was codified in U.S. through Section 289 of the and Act of 1952, affirming the right of Canadian-born Indians—typically those registered under Canada's with at least 50% indigenous ancestry—to enter the U.S. for employment, study, investment, retirement, or immigration without visas or standard entry requirements, provided they present proof of status such as a tribal enrollment card, long-form birth certificate, or secure Indian status card. In practice, this framework enables cross-border labor participation, particularly for First Nations individuals from tribes like the Mohawk or Haudenosaunee, who maintain traditional economic ties spanning the , such as in , gaming, or seasonal work in states like New York, , or Washington. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) processes these entries via issuance upon proof of eligibility, facilitating workforce flows that support industries reliant on indigenous labor without the barriers faced by non-indigenous migrants. However, application varies for and Métis; while some Inuit communities near the invoke similar customary , formal benefits are primarily limited to status First Nations, with Métis often requiring standard visa processes absent specific tribal affiliations qualifying under the treaty's "American Indian" definition. Canada's ruled in 1956 that the does not modern , a pre-Confederation agreement with Britain, leading to asymmetrical recognition: U.S. entry remains streamlined, but re-entry to for beneficiaries follows citizenship rules, though status cards expedite . Taxation disputes arise under this mobility, with U.S. (IRS) generally taxing earned on U.S. by non-resident Canadian First Nations workers, despite occasional unsuccessful claims of treaty-based exemptions; for instance, courts have immunity for Mohawk individuals, affirming that pertain to mobility rather than fiscal . Cross-border earnings may trigger dual taxation absent bilateral credits, underscoring the treaty's focus on practical passage over comprehensive economic insulation. Post-9/11 security enhancements, including the of 2009, introduced delays and heightened scrutiny at ports of entry, with indigenous crossers facing extended waits, secondary inspections, and documentation demands despite treaty rights, as CBP prioritizes anti-terrorism measures over historical exemptions. These frictions, while disruptive to traditional practices like harvesting or family visits, have not abrogated core mobility rights, instead prompting advocacy for streamlined processes, such as the 2024 temporary measures allowing U.S.-based indigenous individuals easier family reunification in . Overall, the framework sustains functional labor and cultural exchanges, demonstrating enduring utility in an era of fortified borders rather than perpetuating narratives of systemic exclusion.

Economic and Professional Contributions

Key Industries and Innovations

Canadian professionals, particularly in STEM fields, have contributed significantly to the U.S. technology sector through facilitated mobility under the TN visa category of the USMCA, which qualifies occupations such as computer systems analysts, engineers, and scientists for temporary entry without the caps or lotteries associated with H-1B visas. This ease of access has enabled a steady inflow of skilled Canadian talent to and other hubs, where foreign-born workers, including Canadians, are overrepresented in high-innovation roles. For instance, Canadian co-founder Garrett Camp helped establish , one of America's billion-dollar startups driven by immigrant founders, which collectively generate substantial job creation and economic value. Canadian inventors are associated with over ,000 U.S. patents through , reflecting a forward citation importance exceeding the , often assigned to U.S. firms due to international mobility and commercialization opportunities south of the . This output underscores skilled Canadian immigrants' in bolstering U.S. , where immigrants overall account for heightened metrics, including 10% greater international citations and doubled likelihood of cross-border co-patenting compared to natives. Such contributions arise partly from Canada's " drain," as tech professionals and startups relocate to the U.S. for superior venture capital, larger markets, and reduced bureaucratic hurdles, amplifying U.S. gains from skilled labor inflows. In entertainment, Canadian directors and producers have integrated into Hollywood's ecosystem, leveraging cross-border production ties—often termed ""—to influence major films, though precise quantification of their share remains elusive amid the industry's opaque talent pipelines. This talent export complements tech impacts by fostering creative innovations, yet the U.S. regulatory flexibility similarly enables outsized contributions relative to Canada's more constrained domestic framework.

Migration Drivers: Economic Realities vs. Canadian Policies

Economic disparities, particularly in wages for high-skill sectors, serve as primary push factors for Canadian migration to the . In the industry, average software salaries reach approximately $144,000 USD annually in the US, compared to $80,000 USD in , representing a premium of over 80% that incentivizes skilled workers to relocate for higher potential. Similarly, while wages show narrower gaps—such as plumbers earning around $68,000 CAD ($50,000 USD) in versus $51,500 USD in the US—tech and engineering roles consistently offer US compensation 50% or more above Canadian levels after adjusting for purchasing power and taxes. Canadian fiscal and regulatory policies exacerbate these incentives through higher marginal tax rates and compliance burdens that reduce net take-home pay and business dynamism. Combined federal-provincial top marginal income tax rates in Canada range from 40% to 53%, exceeding the US federal rate of 37% plus state taxes typically totaling under 50% in most jurisdictions. Regulatory accumulation has risen 37% from 2006 to 2021, contributing to Canada's drop to 23rd in global ease of doing business rankings, behind the US at 6th, which stifles innovation and job creation. Universal healthcare in Canada, often cited as a retention factor, masks underlying inefficiencies including extended wait times that deter professionals valuing timely access. Median waits for specialist treatment total 30 weeks in Canada, with patients enduring 6.3 weeks beyond clinically reasonable post-referral, contrasted against US first-time specialist appointments averaging 24 days. These correlate with slower medical in Canada, as resource constraints limit R&D compared to the US market-driven model. This migration pattern manifests as brain drain, with approximately 10% of Canadian STEM graduates relocating to the US for better opportunities, a trend amplified post-2020 by remote work enabling seamless cross-border employment without immediate relocation barriers. For the US economy, inflows bolster productivity in tech and trades; for Canada, outflows reflect policy shortcomings—such as over-taxation and over-regulation suppressing wage growth and dynamism—rather than external "imperialism," as evidenced by stagnant per-capita GDP growth lagging the US by 20-30% over decades.

Notable Individuals

Entertainment and Media Figures

Canadian-born individuals have achieved outsized in American , often relocating to access the ' expansive, market-driven industry, which contrasts with Canada's publicly funded sector by a of approximately 40 million. This migration has enabled in and cultural influence, with figures like and generating billions in through Hollywood productions. Their adaptations highlight how U.S. commercial freedoms facilitate global reach, unencumbered by domestic quotas or subsidies that Canadian outputs. Jim Carrey, born in Newmarket, Ontario, in 1962, moved to Los Angeles in the early 1990s and became one of Hollywood's top comedic draws, starring in films that cumulatively grossed over $3.2 billion domestically by 2025, ranking him among the 25 highest-grossing actors historically. Key successes include The Mask (1994, $351 million worldwide) and Bruce Almighty (2003, $484 million), where his physical comedy and improvisational style thrived in the U.S. studio system. Michael J. Fox, born in Edmonton, Alberta, in 1961, relocated to Los Angeles at age 18 in 1979, rising to fame on Family Ties (1982–1989), earning three Emmy Awards for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series (1986–1988). His film roles, notably as Marty McFly in Back to the Future (1985, over $381 million worldwide), solidified his stardom, with additional honors including four Golden Globes. Fox's career exemplifies leveraging U.S. television and film markets for sustained impact, amassing lifetime achievement awards like the 2023 Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award. In comics and media origins, , born in in 1914 to Ukrainian immigrant parents, co-created with in 1933, drawing from his Toronto experiences; the character debuted in (1938) and profoundly shaped , spawning a franchise worth billions. Shuster's move to at age 10 and work in U.S. underscore early cross-border in media. Canadian-born talents have secured disproportionate relative to Canada's demographic , with multiple wins in acting and production—such as Mary Pickford's for Coquette ()—despite comprising under 10% of North America's , reflecting their integration into U.S.-centric ecosystems like the Oscars and Emmys.

Political and Business Leaders

Rafael ", born on , , in , , to an American and immigrant , exemplifies Canadian-born political as a Republican U.S. Senator from since 2013. Eligible for U.S. via his 's , Cruz renounced his dual Canadian in 2013 amid during his presidential bid. His for free-market principles, including opposition to expansive government regulations and support for tax cuts, has influenced Republican policy debates, such as his role in the 2013 government shutdown over Obamacare funding. Cruz's tenure reflects achievement through U.S. institutional opportunities rather than cultural attributes like purported Canadian deference, as evidenced by his rapid ascent from Solicitor General (2003–2008) to Senate via competitive elections emphasizing individual merit and constitutional originalism. In business, Jack Leonard Warner, born August 2, 1892, in London, Ontario, to Polish Jewish immigrants, co-founded Warner Bros. Studios in 1923 and served as its president, pioneering sound films with The Jazz Singer in 1927 and expanding into a major Hollywood entity by the 1930s. Warner's entrepreneurial drive transformed the family nickelodeon operation into a vertically integrated studio controlling production, distribution, and exhibition, generating revenues that peaked at over $100 million annually by the mid-20th century through innovations like color film and anti-communist content during the Red Scare era. His success underscores adaptation to U.S. market dynamism, including aggressive deal-making and labor negotiations, rather than reliance on collaborative norms; Warner Bros.' lobbying for favorable trade and antitrust policies in the 1930s–1940s helped shape industry standards favoring competition over government intervention. These figures demonstrate Canadian Americans' integration into right-leaning spheres, prioritizing empirical economic liberty over collectivist frameworks prevalent in Canadian policy discourse.

Recognition and Legacy

Canadian American Day and Commemorations

In Connecticut, June 24 is proclaimed annually as French Canadian-American Day to honor Americans of French Canadian ancestry, their , and contributions to the state. This observance, established through state in 2013, recognizes the historical migration of to industrial centers during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but it remains localized without equivalent proclamations in neighboring states like New York or despite significant Canadian-descended populations there. No federal or national Canadian American Day exists, distinguishing it from widely adopted ethnic holidays such as or , which benefit from robust lobbying by Irish and Italian American organizations. Observances, where held, typically involve low-key events like community gatherings, flag raisings, or educational programs on shared border history, emphasizing cultural ties rather than political separatism. These activities underscore a heritage of integration, as Canadian Americans—numbering over 1 million self-identified in the 2020 U.S. Census—have not pursued the institutional separatism seen in other immigrant groups, evidenced by the absence of dedicated national heritage months or mandatory school curricula akin to those for Hispanic or Asian Americans. The muted profile reflects weaker ethnic advocacy structures, with Canadian heritage often subsumed under broader Anglo or regional identities, signaling effective assimilation into mainstream American society without persistent demands for distinct recognition. This pattern of limited commemoration aligns with demographic trends: unlike Irish Americans, who maintain influential parades drawing millions, or Italian Americans with federally backed heritage months, Canadian American events lack comparable scale or funding, as state-level initiatives like Connecticut's generate minimal media coverage or participation beyond niche Franco-American communities. The focus remains celebratory of bilateral goodwill—evident in occasional joint U.S.-Canada friendship days proclaimed by presidents, such as in 1988—rather than assertions of unassimilated identity.

Founded Cities and Institutions

Early French Canadian settlers from New France established key outposts in the Great Lakes region, including Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, settled in 1668 by Jesuit missionaries Jacques Marquette and Claude Dablon as a mission and trading hub among Indigenous peoples. This settlement, predating formal Canadian polity but rooted in colonial activities that shaped Franco-Canadian identity, served as an entrepreneurial base for fur trade and missionary work, evolving into Michigan's oldest city by leveraging the St. Marys River's strategic position for commerce. In the early 18th century, French Canadian traders and explorers extended settlements into areas like Detroit, , where organized Fort Pontchartrain du Détroit in 1701 as a fortified to control regional waterways and Indigenous alliances. These emphasized practical economic footholds over expansive colonial claims, with comprising up to 80% of Detroit's non-Indigenous by 1796, fostering mills and basic for and . Ohio saw fewer foundations, with transient French Canadian fur-trading encampments along but no enduring cities attributable to them in historical . Nineteenth-century Canadian immigrants, particularly French speakers from Quebec, contributed to institutions in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, establishing Catholic parishes and mutual aid societies like extensions of Quebec's Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste, founded in 1834, to support lumber workers and maintain cultural ties. These served as integration points, providing religious services, credit networks, and communal mills that processed timber for regional export, though such efforts remained localized and did not spawn major urban centers. Overall, verifiable Canadian-founded places constitute a negligible portion of U.S. municipalities, confined to border enclaves amid broader American settlement patterns.

Challenges and Criticisms

Assimilation Barriers and Cultural Clashes

Canadian immigrants to the United States encounter fewer assimilation barriers than many other groups, largely attributable to shared Anglo-European cultural roots, common legal systems derived from British tradition, and predominant use of English as the primary . Linguistic integration occurs rapidly; studies of immigrants with strong initial English proficiency, typical among Canadians, show that better skills correlate with higher rates of intermarriage, occupational , and social embedding by the second generation. Intermarriage rates further accelerate this , as evidenced by research indicating that unions with native-born enhance economic and social assimilation for immigrants overall, a dynamic amplified for culturally proximate groups like Canadians where hyphenated identities fade quickly. Cultural frictions, though minor, arise from nuanced differences in interpersonal norms. Canadians' emphasis on politeness—often manifesting in indirect phrasing and deference to avoid confrontation—can clash with American preferences for directness and assertiveness in professional and social interactions. Similarly, Canadian humor, frequently self-deprecating and ironic, may be misinterpreted in U.S. contexts as diffidence or lack of ambition, contrasting with more boastful or competitive American styles. On firearm policy, Canadian immigrants commonly retain support for stringent regulations and lower ownership norms—reflecting Canada's 35 guns per 100 people versus the U.S.'s 120—potentially conflicting with Second Amendment-centric American expectations in communities valuing armed self-defense. Empirically, these groups exhibit low social deviance, with immigrants broadly—including high-skilled cohorts like many —associated with victimization and offending rates below those of U.S.-born populations. From to 2023, immigrants were 44% less likely to experience violent victimization and demonstrated higher reporting, patterns consistent with stable integration rather than cultural isolation. Overall, such affirm that assimilation barriers for Canadian Americans remain minimal, with clashes more akin to regional U.S. variations than profound ethnic divides.

Debates on Dual Loyalty and Policy Influences

Critics on the political right have occasionally raised concerns about Canadian immigrants potentially importing elements of Canada's welfare-oriented policies, such as , into the , fearing these could American emphasis on market-driven and responsibility. For instance, during a on , Senator argued against emulating Canada's , citing that over 52,000 sought treatment abroad in due to domestic shortages and long wait times, and highlighting Newfoundland Williams' 2010 travel to the U.S. for heart unavailable promptly in Canada. positioned such advocacy as misguided, countering claims by figures like Senator Bernie Sanders who praised Canada's model for Medicare-for-All proposals, emphasizing instead the U.S. 's strengths in rapid access and technological advancement. Accusations of dual loyalty among Canadian Americans remain rare and subdued compared to those leveled at immigrants from more ideologically distant nations, largely due to shared Anglo-American cultural and linguistic ties, though dual citizens have reported shifting allegiances amid U.S.-Canada trade frictions, such as those escalating in 2025. Conservative commentators have critiqued potential "welfare migration" incentives, suggesting Canada's generous social programs might attract individuals prioritizing benefits over productivity, yet empirical data contradicts this: Canadian immigrants to the U.S. from 2010 to 2023 comprised a highly skilled cohort with median wage offers exceeding U.S. norms, contributing positively to fiscal balances through elevated employment and earnings growth outpacing natives. Progressive viewpoints frame Canadian inflows as cultural enrichment bolstering diverse policy discourse, but assessments grounded in economic metrics reveal a net positive impact without disproportionate strain on public resources, as these migrants often fill high-value roles in sectors like and . Recent cross-border tensions, including widespread U.S. support for Canada's 2022 trucker protests against mandates—manifested through millions in donations from American sources and planned solidarity convoys—underscore policy divergences rather than unified loyalty to Canadian , with U.S. backers viewing the events as a stand against overreach akin to domestic concerns. Overall, while debates persist on selectively adopting Canadian policies, evidence supports caution against wholesale importation, given documented inefficiencies like extended wait times in Canada's system versus U.S. advantages in outcomes for specialized care.

References

  1. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/canadian-immigrants-united-states
  2. https://www.dentonisd.org/cms/lib/TX21000245/Centricity/Domain/535/emigration%2520from%2520canada%2520to%2520the%2520US.pdf
  3. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/canadian-immigrants
  4. https://www.imdb.com/list/ls051188021/
  5. https://www.amrevmuseum.org/canada-and-the-american-revolution-revolution-around-the-world
  6. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/french-canadian-immigrants-struck-fear-into-new-england-communities-180972951/
  7. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/french-canadian-immigrants-in-new-england/
  8. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/loyalists
  9. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/canadian-americans
  10. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/canadian-immigrants-united-states-2021
  11. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/08/21/key-findings-about-us-immigrants/
  12. https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/temporary-workers/tn-usmca-professionals
  13. https://newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/the-little-canadas-of-new-england/
  14. https://vermonthistory.org/journal/86/VH8601FrenchCanadianImmigration.pdf
  15. https://fahfminn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/French-Canadian-Emigration-to-the-United-States.pdf
  16. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/homestead-act
  17. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/canadian-immigrants-united-states-2016
  18. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/1990/demographics/p23-161.pdf
  19. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rp02_8-dr02_8/p3.html
  20. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c11144/c11144.pdf
  21. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/employment/visas-canadian-mexican-usmca-professional-workers.html
  22. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/tn-visas-role-us-labor-market-and-its-uncertain-future
  23. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/naftas-economic-impact
  24. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/36-28-0001/2025007/article/00006-eng.htm
  25. https://canadianimmigrant.ca/news/canada-to-u-s-migration-slows-but-skilled-talent-still-crossing-the-border
  26. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/canada-falls-further-behind-us-race-attract-top-talent
  27. https://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/patents-index-aspx/
  28. https://www.lippes.com/insights/can-foreign-nationals-work-remotely-in-the-u-s-2914
  29. https://financialpost.com/news/economy/opinion-canada-turn-u-s-brain-drain-into-economic-gain
  30. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2024/demo/acsbr-019.pdf
  31. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs.html
  32. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data.html
  33. https://thehub.ca/2024/08/27/hub-exclusive-u-s-ambassador-says-canadians-are-consuming-an-unhealthy-amount-of-american-news/
  34. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2004/01/14/americans-and-canadians/
  35. https://www.motherjones.com/media/2018/11/a-new-study-could-explain-why-americans-think-canadians-are-so-damn-nice/
  36. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6115192/2025/02/13/usa-hockey-dominance-4-nations-face-off/
  37. https://d-nb.info/990807207/34
  38. https://ftp.iza.org/dp1142.pdf
  39. https://runawayjuno.com/runaway-to/runaway-daily-usa/runaway-daily-usa-day-26-the-day-i-ate-canadian-food-tourtiere-tim-horton-poutine/
  40. https://thecanadaguide.com/symbols/holidays/
  41. https://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/canadian-hockey-fans-travel-to-u-s-with-mixed-feelings-to-support-nhl-teams-1.7516155
  42. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20160921-where-does-canadas-accent-come-from
  43. http://www.danieldrezner.com/archives/003743.html
  44. https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/1.4598959
  45. https://labourmarketresearch.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12651-023-00340-z
  46. https://www.wsj.com/opinion/canada-has-itself-to-blame-for-brain-drain-economy-opportunity-policy-0808e037
  47. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2022/12/the-differences-between-canada-and-the-u-s-remain-significant/
  48. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/canada-health-care-access-1.6574184
  49. https://leger360.com/legers-north-american-tracker-january-27-2023/
  50. https://www.statista.com/chart/27576/support-gun-control-us-canada/
  51. https://tribalcollegejournal.org/borderline-indigenous-communities-international-frontier/
  52. https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2025/02/nibi-chronicles-invisible-borders/
  53. https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-772
  54. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/indigenous-perspectives-on-the-fur-trade
  55. https://digital.library.mcgill.ca/nwc/history/10.htm
  56. https://indigenouspeoplesatlasofcanada.ca/article/fur-trade/
  57. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081624-082458
  58. https://www.canadashistory.ca/explore/fur-trade/untold-stories
  59. https://www.indianaffairs.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/pdfs/History_and_Culture_Turtle_Mountain.pdf
  60. https://www.indianaffairs.nd.gov/north-dakota-tribal-nations/turtle-mountain-band-chippewa
  61. https://fam.state.gov/FAM/08FAM/08FAM040106.html
  62. https://ca.usembassy.gov/first-nations-and-native-americans/
  63. http://www.naicob.org/uploads/4/6/9/1/46918873/jay_treaty_guide__1_.pdf
  64. https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/indigenous-jay-treaty-work-us-1.7103716
  65. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/publications-manuals/indigenous-mobility.html
  66. https://sites.middlebury.edu/borderrites/legalities/
  67. https://www.taxnotes.com/court-opinions-court-appeals/%255Bcm%253Acategories%255D/mohawk-indian-couple-not-exempt-federal-income-tax/1993/08/17/1mf28
  68. https://polaristax.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/US-Tax-Savings-for-Canadian-Indigenous-Groups.pdf
  69. https://ictnews.org/archive/border-concerns-of-native-communities-addressed/
  70. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2024/10/supporting-cross-border-mobility-for-indigenous-peoples.html
  71. https://cedar.wwu.edu/bpri_publications/138/
  72. https://giovanniperi.ucdavis.edu/uploads/5/6/8/2/56826033/stem-workers.pdf
  73. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2018/10/25/55-of-americas-billion-dollar-startups-have-immigrant-founder/
  74. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3368282
  75. https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-patents-innovation-1.5264711
  76. https://www.nber.org/digest/20233/outsize-role-immigrants-us-innovation
  77. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-canadian-tech-brain-drain-questions-answers/
  78. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/canada-film-industry-post-hollywood-strikes-1236127228/
  79. https://madeinca.ca/film-and-tv-industry-statistics-canada/
  80. https://www.orientsoftware.com/blog/software-engineer-salary-by-country/
  81. https://bluerecruit.us/how-pay-differs-in-the-us-and-canada/
  82. https://www.greenbacktaxservices.com/blog/canada-taxes-vs-us/
  83. https://thehub.ca/2024/07/08/canadas-marginal-tax-rates-are-much-higher-than-u-s-with-greater-increases-across-income-levels/
  84. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/economy/article-sharp-rise-in-regulatory-burden-is-harming-economic-job-growth-study/
  85. https://chamber.ca/canadian-chamber-appears-before-oggo-committee-on-government-operations-and-estimates/
  86. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/waiting-your-turn-wait-times-for-health-care-in-canada-2024
  87. https://www.beaudoinimmigration.com/post/how-trump-could-turbocharge-the-brain-drain-from-canada
  88. https://payroll.ca/getmedia/5c30bac6-ea2f-4487-ac9b-ed3be7088dd3/CPA-Work-Trends-v1-9-%28web%29.pdf
  89. https://immigration.ca/canadas-brain-drain-figures-show-technology-graduate-exodus/
  90. https://www.thewrap.com/famous-canadians-canada-day/
  91. https://pantheon.world/profile/occupation/actor/country/canada
  92. https://collider.com/jim-carrey-domestic-box-office-3-billion/
  93. https://www.the-numbers.com/person/530401-Jim-Carrey
  94. https://www.jimcarreyonline.com/info/boxoffice.html
  95. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Michael-J-Fox
  96. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000150/awards/
  97. https://www.biography.com/actors/michael-j-fox
  98. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/joe-shuster
  99. https://www.cbc.ca/kidsnews/post/from-canadian-roots-to-odd-superpowers-5-fun-superman-facts
  100. https://hnmag.ca/awards/looking-back-at-notable-canadian-oscar-winners-in-major-categories/
  101. https://www.cbc.ca/arts/10-of-canada-s-biggest-academy-awards-wins-that-you-may-have-never-heard-about-1.6342571
  102. https://macleans.ca/politics/washington/ted-cruz-made-in-canada/
  103. https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/03/23/394713013/is-ted-cruz-allowed-to-run-since-he-was-born-in-canada
  104. https://www.canadaswalkoffame.com/inductees/jack-l-warner/
  105. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/jack-warner
  106. https://codes.findlaw.com/ct/title-10-education-and-culture/ct-gen-st-sect-10-29a/
  107. https://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/act/pa/2013PA-00210-R00HB-06671-PA.htm
  108. https://www.genealogyblog.com/?p=4099
  109. https://ctmirror.org/2013/06/07/bipartisan-support-whitehead-state-polka-and-second-state-song/
  110. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/proclamation-5839-united-states-canada-days-peace-and-friendship-1988
  111. https://www.achp.gov/preserve-america/community/sault-ste-marie-michigan
  112. https://saultstemarie.com/soo-area-and-great-waters-region/our-local-history/
  113. https://ethnicity.lib.mtu.edu/groups_FrCanada.html
  114. https://archives.nmu.edu/beaumier/Canadiansexhibit.pdf
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2813069/
  116. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/425436
  117. https://raybwilliams.medium.com/two-nations-two-paths-understanding-the-deep-differences-between-the-united-states-and-canada-89e54dd06171
  118. https://www.gzeromedia.com/gzero-north/graphic-truth-the-north-american-gun-divide
  119. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c100189
  120. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/immigrants-cut-victimization-rates-boost-crime-reporting
  121. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/content/immigrants-and-crime
  122. https://ballotpedia.org/Fact_check/Did_52%2C000_Canadians_leave_Canada_for_healthcare_in_2014
  123. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/danny-william-ted-cruz-1.3971958
  124. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/07/us/politics/bernie-sanders-ted-cruz-debate-health-care.html
  125. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-us-canada-trade-war-dual-citizens/
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5270643/
  127. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/how-american-right-wing-funding-for-canadian-trucker-protests-could-sway-u-s-politics
  128. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/us-organizers-plan-convoys-support-canadian-truckers-2022-02-11/
  129. https://www.vox.com/2016/10/9/13222798/canadians-seeking-medical-care-us-trump-debate
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.