Hubbry Logo
AntAntMain
AntAntMain
Open search
Ant
community hub

Ant

#Wikipedia

#Grokipedia

Hub updates

Hub contents (all pages)

Talk channels
chitchatchitchat
Ant
Community hub
Ant
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
2327116

Community hub

Ant

logo
0 subscribers
8 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Ant.
family of insects

From Wikipedia

family of insects

Media

Notes
0

  • Respect all members: no insults, harassment, or hate speech.
  • Be tolerant of different viewpoints, cultures, and beliefs. If you do not agree with others, just create separate note, article or collection.
  • Clearly distinguish between personal opinion and fact.
  • Verify facts before posting, especially when writing about history, science, or statistics.
  • Promotional content must be published on the “Related Services and Products” page—no more than one paragraph per service. You can also create subpages under the “Related Services and Products” page and publish longer promotional text there.
  • Do not post materials that infringe on copyright without permission.
  • Always credit sources when sharing information, quotes, or media.
  • Be respectful of the work of others when making changes.
  • Discuss major edits instead of removing others' contributions without reason.
  • If you notice rule-breaking, notify community about it in talks.
  • Do not share personal data of others without their consent.
  • Nothing was collected or created yet.

    Ant
    Ant
    Ant
    View on Wikipedia
    from Wikipedia
    Family of insects

    Ants
    Temporal range: 113–0 Ma
    PreꞒ
    Ꞓ
    O
    S
    D
    C
    P
    T
    J
    K
    Pg
    N
    Late Aptian – Present
    Fire ants
    Scientific classification Edit this classification
    Kingdom: Animalia
    Phylum: Arthropoda
    Class: Insecta
    Order: Hymenoptera
    Infraorder: Aculeata
    Superfamily: Formicoidea
    Latreille, 1809[1]
    Family: Formicidae
    Latreille, 1809
    Type species
    Formica rufa
    Linnaeus, 1761
    Subfamilies
    • Agroecomyrmecinae
    • Amblyoponinae (incl. "Apomyrminae")
    • Aneuretinae
    • †Brownimeciinae
    • Dolichoderinae
    • Dorylinae
    • Ectatomminae
    • †Formiciinae
    • Formicinae
    • †Haidomyrmecinae
    • Leptanillinae
    • Martialinae
    • Myrmeciinae (incl. "Nothomyrmeciinae")
    • Myrmicinae
    • Paraponerinae
    • Ponerinae
    • Proceratiinae
    • Pseudomyrmecinae
    • †Sphecomyrminae
    • †Zigrasimeciinae
    Bright red ant, likely part of the Formica pallidefulva species group, on a flower

    Ants are eusocial insects of the family Formicidae and, along with the related wasps and bees, belong to the order Hymenoptera.[2] Ants evolved from vespoid wasp ancestors in the Cretaceous period. More than 13,800 of an estimated total of 22,000 species have been classified. They are easily identified by their geniculate (elbowed) antennae and the distinctive node-like structure that forms their slender waists.

    Ants form colonies that range in size from a few dozen individuals often living in small natural cavities to highly organised colonies that may occupy large territories with a sizeable nest (or nests) that consist of millions of individuals, in some cases they reach hundreds of millions of individuals in super colonies. Typical colonies consist of various castes of sterile, wingless females, most of which are workers (ergates), as well as soldiers (dinergates) and other specialised groups. Nearly all ant colonies also have some fertile males called "drones" and one or more fertile females called "queens" (gynes). The colonies are described as superorganisms because the ants appear to operate as a unified entity, collectively working together to support the colony.

    Ants have colonised almost every landmass on Earth. The only places lacking indigenous ants are Antarctica and a few remote or inhospitable islands. Ants thrive in moist tropical ecosystems and may exceed the combined biomass of wild birds and mammals. Their success in so many environments has been attributed to their social organisation and their ability to modify habitats, tap resources, and defend themselves. Their long co-evolution with other species has led to mimetic, commensal, parasitic, and mutualistic relationships.

    Ant societies have division of labour, communication between individuals, and an ability to solve complex problems. These parallels with human societies have long been an inspiration and subject of study. Many human cultures make use of ants in cuisine, medication, and rites. Some species are valued in their role as biological pest control agents. Their ability to exploit resources may bring ants into conflict with humans, however, as they can damage crops and invade buildings. Some species, such as the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) of South America, are regarded as invasive species in other parts of the world, establishing themselves in areas where they have been introduced accidentally.

    Etymology

    [edit]

    The word ant and the archaic word emmet[3] are derived from ante, emete of Middle English, which come from ǣmette of Old English; these are all related to Low Saxon e(e)mt, empe and varieties (Old Saxon emeta) and to German Ameise (Old High German āmeiza). All of these words come from West Germanic *ǣmaitjōn, and the original meaning of the word was "the biter" (from Proto-Germanic *ai-, "off, away" + *mait- "cut").[4][5]

    The family name Formicidae is derived from the Latin formīca ("ant")[6] from which the words in other Romance languages, such as the Portuguese formiga, Italian formica, Spanish hormiga, Romanian furnică, and French fourmi are derived.

    The study of ants is called myrmecology, from Ancient Greek μύρμηξ mýrmēx ("ant"). It has been hypothesised that a Proto-Indo-European word *morwi- was the root for Sanskrit vamrah, Greek μύρμηξ mýrmēx, Latin formīca, Old Church Slavonic mraviji, Old Irish moirb, Old Norse maurr, Dutch mier, Swedish myra, Danish myre, Middle Dutch miere, and Crimean Gothic miera.[7][8]

    Taxonomy and evolution

    [edit]

    The family Formicidae belongs to the order Hymenoptera, which also includes sawflies, bees, and wasps. Ants evolved from a lineage within the stinging wasps, and a 2013 study suggests that they are a sister group of the Apoidea.[9] However, since Apoidea is a superfamily, ants must be upgraded to the same rank.[10] A more detailed basic taxonomy was proposed in 2020. Three species of the extinct mid-Cretaceous genera Camelomecia and Camelosphecia were placed outside of the Formicidae, in a separate clade within the general superfamily Formicoidea, which, together with Apoidea, forms the higher-ranking group Formicapoidina.[1] Fernández et al. (2021) suggest that the common ancestors of ants and apoids within the Formicapoidina probably existed as early as in the end of the Jurassic period, before divergence in the Cretaceous.[10]

    Relationship of ants with aculeate wasp families
    Aculeata

    Chrysidoidea

    Vespidae

    Rhopalosomatidae

    Pompilidae

    Mutillidae

    Tiphiidae

    Chyphotidae

    Scolioidea

    Apoidea

    Formicoidea

    Phylogenetic position of the Formicidae as seen in Johnson et al. (2013)[9][10]
    Relationships of ant subfamilies
    Formicoidea
    Formicoid

    Myrmicinae

    Ectatomminae

    Formicinae

    Dolichoderinae

    Aneuretinae

    Pseudomyrmecinae

    Myrmeciinae

    Dorylinae‡

    Poneroid

    Ponerinae

    Agroecomyrmecinae

    Paraponerinae

    Proceratiinae

    Amblyoponinae

    Apomyrminae

    Leptanilloid

    Leptanillinae

    Martialinae

    (Formicidae)
    A phylogeny of the extant ant subfamilies.[11][12][13]

    *Cerapachyinae is paraphyletic

    ‡ The previous dorylomorph subfamilies – Ecitoninae, Aenictinae, Aenictogitoninae, Cerapachyinae, Leptanilloidinae – were synonymized under Dorylinae by Brady et al. in 2014[14]
    Ants fossilised in Baltic amber

    In 1966, E. O. Wilson and his colleagues identified the fossil remains of an ant (Sphecomyrma) that lived in the Cretaceous period. The specimen, trapped in amber dating back to around 92 million years ago, has features found in some wasps, but not found in modern ants.[15] The oldest fossils of ants date to the mid-Cretaceous, around 113–100 million years ago, which belong to extinct stem-groups such as the Haidomyrmecinae, Sphecomyrminae and Zigrasimeciinae, with modern ant subfamilies appearing towards the end of the Cretaceous around 80–70 million years ago.[16][17] Ants diversified extensively during the Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution[18] and assumed ecological dominance around 60 million years ago.[19][20][21][22] Some groups, such as the Leptanillinae and Martialinae, are suggested to have diversified from early primitive ants that were likely to have been predators underneath the surface of the soil.[13][23]

    During the Cretaceous period, a few species of primitive ants ranged widely on the Laurasian supercontinent (the Northern Hemisphere). Their representation in the fossil record is poor, in comparison to the populations of other insects, representing only about 1% of fossil evidence of insects in the era. Ants became dominant after adaptive radiation at the beginning of the Paleogene period. By the Oligocene and Miocene, ants had come to represent 20–40% of all insects found in major fossil deposits. Of the species that lived in the Eocene epoch, around one in 10 genera survive to the present. Genera surviving today comprise 56% of the genera in Baltic amber fossils (early Oligocene), and 92% of the genera in Dominican amber fossils (apparently early Miocene).[19][24]

    Termites live in colonies and are sometimes called "white ants", but termites are only distantly related to ants. They are the sub-order Isoptera, and together with cockroaches, they form the order Blattodea. Blattodeans are related to mantids, crickets, and other winged insects that do not undergo complete metamorphosis. Like ants, termites are eusocial, with sterile workers, but they differ greatly in the genetics of reproduction. The similarity of their social structure to that of ants is attributed to convergent evolution.[25] Velvet ants look like large ants, but are wingless female wasps.[26][27]

    Distribution and diversity

    [edit]
    Region Number of
    species [28]
    Neotropics 2,162
    Nearctic 580
    Europe 180
    Africa 2,500
    Asia 2,080
    Melanesia 275
    Australia 985
    Polynesia 42

    Ants have a cosmopolitan distribution. They are found on all continents except Antarctica, and only a few large islands, such as Greenland, Iceland, parts of Polynesia and the Hawaiian Islands lack native ant species.[29][30] Ants occupy a wide range of ecological niches and exploit many different food resources as direct or indirect herbivores, predators and scavengers. Most ant species are omnivorous generalists, but a few are specialist feeders. There is considerable variation in ant abundance across habitats, peaking in the moist tropics to nearly six times that found in less suitable habitats.[31] Their ecological dominance has been examined primarily using estimates of their biomass: myrmecologist E. O. Wilson had estimated in 2009 that at any one time the total number of ants was between one and ten quadrillion (short scale) (i.e., between 1015 and 1016) and using this estimate he had suggested that the total biomass of all the ants in the world was approximately equal to the total biomass of the entire human race.[32] More careful estimates made in 2022 which take into account regional variations puts the global ant contribution at 12 megatons of dry carbon, which is about 20% of the total human contribution, but greater than that of the wild birds and mammals combined. This study also puts a conservative estimate of the ants at about 20 × 1015 (20 quadrillion).[33][34][35]

    Ants range in size from 0.75 to 52 millimetres (0.030–2.0 in),[36][37] the largest species being the fossil Titanomyrma giganteum, the queen of which was 6 cm (2+1⁄2 in) long with a wingspan of 15 cm (6 in).[38] Ants vary in colour; most ants are yellow to red or brown to black, but a few species are green and some tropical species have a metallic lustre. More than 13,800 species are currently known[39] (with upper estimates of the potential existence of about 22,000; see the article List of ant genera), with the greatest diversity in the tropics. Taxonomic studies continue to resolve the classification and systematics of ants. Online databases of ant species, including AntWeb and the Hymenoptera Name Server, help to keep track of the known and newly described species.[39] The relative ease with which ants may be sampled and studied in ecosystems has made them useful as indicator species in biodiversity studies.[40][41]

    Morphology

    [edit]
    Diagram of a worker ant (Neoponera verenae)

    Ants are distinct in their morphology from other insects in having geniculate (elbowed) antennae, metapleural glands, and a strong constriction of their second abdominal segment into a node-like petiole. The body is divided into three distinct sections (formally known as tagmata): the head, mesosoma, and metasoma. The petiole forms a narrow waist between their mesosoma (thorax plus the first abdominal segment, which is fused to it) and gaster (abdomen less the abdominal segments in the petiole). The petiole may be formed by one or two nodes (the second alone, or the second and third abdominal segments).[42] Tergosternal fusion, when the tergite and sternite of a segment fuse together, can occur partly or fully on the second, third and fourth abdominal segment and is used in identification. Fourth abdominal tergosternal fusion was formerly used as character that defined the poneromorph subfamilies, Ponerinae and relatives within their clade, but this is no longer considered a synapomorphic character.[43]

    Like other arthropods, ants have an exoskeleton, an external covering that provides a protective casing around the body and a point of attachment for muscles, in contrast to the internal skeletons of humans and other vertebrates. Insects do not have lungs; oxygen and other gases, such as carbon dioxide, pass through their exoskeleton via tiny valves called spiracles. Insects also lack closed blood vessels; instead, they have a long, thin, perforated tube along the top of the body (called the "dorsal aorta") that functions like a heart, and pumps haemolymph toward the head, thus driving the circulation of the internal fluids. The nervous system consists of a ventral nerve cord that runs the length of the body, with several ganglia and branches along the way reaching into the extremities of the appendages.[44]

    Head

    [edit]
    Bull ant showing the powerful mandibles and the relatively large compound eyes that provide excellent vision

    An ant's head contains many sensory organs. Like most insects, ants have compound eyes made from numerous tiny lenses attached together. Ant eyes are good for acute movement detection, but do not offer a high resolution image. They also have three small ocelli (simple eyes) on the top of the head that detect light levels and polarization.[45] Compared to vertebrates, ants tend to have blurrier eyesight, particularly in smaller species,[46] and a few subterranean taxa are completely blind.[12] However, some ants, such as Australia's bulldog ant, have excellent vision and are capable of discriminating the distance and size of objects moving nearly a meter away.[47] Based on experiments conducted to test their ability to differentiate between selected wavelengths of light, some ant species such as Camponotus blandus, Solenopsis invicta, and Formica cunicularia are thought to possess a degree of colour vision.[48]

    Two antennae ("feelers") are attached to the head; these organs detect chemicals, air currents, and vibrations; they also are used to transmit and receive signals through touch. The head has two strong jaws, the mandibles, used to carry food, manipulate objects, construct nests, and for defence.[44] In some species, a small pocket (infrabuccal chamber) inside the mouth stores food, so it may be passed to other ants or their larvae.[49]

    Mesosoma

    [edit]

    Both the legs and wings of the ant are attached to the mesosoma ("thorax"). The legs terminate in a hooked claw which allows them to hook on and climb surfaces.[50] Only reproductive ants (queens and males) have wings. Queens shed their wings after the nuptial flight, leaving visible stubs, a distinguishing feature of queens. In a few species, wingless queens (ergatoids) and males occur.[44]

    Metasoma

    [edit]

    The metasoma (the "abdomen") of the ant houses important internal organs, including those of the reproductive, respiratory (tracheae), and excretory systems. Workers of many species have their egg-laying structures modified into stings that are used for subduing prey and defending their nests.[44]

    Polymorphism

    [edit]
    Seven leafcutter ant workers of various castes (left) and two queens (right)

    In the colonies of a few ant species, there are physical castes—workers in distinct size-classes, called minor (micrergates), median, and major ergates (macrergates). Often, the larger ants have disproportionately larger heads, and correspondingly stronger mandibles. Although formally known as dinergates, such individuals are sometimes called "soldier" ants because their stronger mandibles make them more effective in fighting, although they still are workers and their "duties" typically do not vary greatly from the minor or median workers.[51] In a few species, the median workers are absent, creating a sharp divide between the minors and majors.[52] Weaver ants, for example, have a distinct bimodal size distribution.[53][54] Some other species show continuous variation in the size of workers. The smallest and largest workers in Carebara diversa show nearly a 500-fold difference in their dry weights.[55]

    Workers cannot mate; however, because of the haplodiploid sex-determination system in ants, workers of a number of species can lay unfertilised eggs that become fully fertile, haploid males. The role of workers may change with their age and in some species, such as honeypot ants, young workers are fed until their gasters are distended, and act as living food storage vessels. These food storage workers are called repletes.[56] For instance, these replete workers develop in the North American honeypot ant Myrmecocystus mexicanus. Usually the largest workers in the colony develop into repletes; and, if repletes are removed from the colony, other workers become repletes, demonstrating the flexibility of this particular polymorphism.[57] This polymorphism in morphology and behaviour of workers initially was thought to be determined by environmental factors such as nutrition and hormones that led to different developmental paths; however, genetic differences between worker castes have been noted in Acromyrmex sp.[58] These polymorphisms are caused by relatively small genetic changes; differences in a single gene of Solenopsis invicta can decide whether the colony will have single or multiple queens.[59] The Australian jack jumper ant (Myrmecia pilosula) has only a single pair of chromosomes (with the males having just one chromosome as they are haploid), the lowest number known for any animal, making it an interesting subject for studies in the genetics and developmental biology of social insects.[60][61]

    Genome size

    [edit]

    Genome size is a fundamental characteristic of an organism. Ants have been found to have tiny genomes, with the evolution of genome size suggested to occur through loss and accumulation of non-coding regions, mainly transposable elements, and occasionally by whole genome duplication.[62] This may be related to colonisation processes, but further studies are needed to verify this.[62]

    Life cycle

    [edit]
    Meat eater ant nest during swarming

    The life of an ant starts from an egg. If the egg is fertilised, the progeny will be female diploid; if not, it will be male haploid. Ants develop by complete metamorphosis with the larva stages passing through a pupal stage before emerging as an adult. The larva is largely immobile and is fed and cared for by workers. Food is given to the larvae by trophallaxis, a process in which an ant regurgitates liquid food held in its crop. This is also how adults share food, stored in the "social stomach". Larvae, especially in the later stages, may also be provided solid food, such as trophic eggs, pieces of prey, and seeds brought by workers.[63]

    The larvae grow through a series of four or five moults and enter the pupal stage. The pupa has the appendages free and not fused to the body as in a butterfly pupa.[64] The differentiation into queens and workers (which are both female), and different castes of workers, is influenced in some species by the nutrition the larvae obtain. Genetic influences and the control of gene expression by the developmental environment are complex and the determination of caste continues to be a subject of research.[65] Winged male ants, called drones (termed "aner" in old literature[51]), emerge from pupae along with the usually winged breeding females. Some species, such as army ants, have wingless queens. Larvae and pupae need to be kept at fairly constant temperatures to ensure proper development, and so often are moved around among the various brood chambers within the colony.[66]

    A new ergate (worker) spends the first few days of its adult life caring for the queen and young. She then graduates to digging and other nest work, and later to defending the nest and foraging. These changes are sometimes fairly sudden, and define what are called temporal castes. Such age-based task-specialization or polyethism has been suggested as having evolved due to the high casualties involved in foraging and defence, making it an acceptable risk only for ants who are older and likely to die sooner from natural causes.[67][68] In the Brazilian ant Forelius pusillus, the nest entrance is closed from the outside to protect the colony from predatory ant species at sunset each day. One to eight workers seal the nest entrance from the outside, in effect sacrificing themselves, as they have no chance of returning to the nest.[69] Whether these seemingly suicidal workers are older workers has not been determined.[70]

    Ant colonies can be long-lived. The queens can live for up to 30 years, and workers live from 1 to 3 years. Males, however, are more transitory, being quite short-lived and surviving for only a few weeks.[71] Ant queens are estimated to live 100 times as long as solitary insects of a similar size.[72]

    Ants are active all year long in the tropics; however, in cooler regions, they survive the winter in hibernation. The forms of inactivity are varied and some temperate species have larvae going into the inactive state (diapause), while in others, the adults alone pass the winter in a state of reduced activity.[73]

    Reproduction

    [edit]
    Winter ant (Prenolepis imparis) mating, the drone is much smaller than the queen

    A wide range of reproductive strategies have been noted in ant species. Females of many species are known to be capable of reproducing asexually through thelytokous parthenogenesis.[74] Secretions from the male accessory glands in some species can plug the female genital opening and prevent females from re-mating.[75] Most ant species have a system in which only the queen and breeding females have the ability to mate. Contrary to popular belief, some ant nests have multiple queens, while others may exist without queens. Workers with the ability to reproduce are called "gamergates" and colonies that lack queens are then called gamergate colonies; colonies with queens are said to be queen-right.[76]

    In the ant Cataglyphis hispanica, workers are produced by hybridization of two distinct lineages while the male and female reproductives are produced through (asexual) parthenogenesis.[77] The production of hybrid workers with the existence of non-hybrid queens and males has been termed as "social hybridogenesis".[78] This has been noted in the genera Messor, Pogonomyrmex, Cataglyphis and Solenopsis.[79] The use of sperm of another species by females has been termed as sperm parasitism.[80] A more complex situation was discovered in 2025 where Messor ibericus queens were shown to lay some eggs that developed into workers which match genetically with a different species of ant, Messor structor. Although the two species overlap in some parts of their range, the colonies studied were on the island of Sicily where M. ibericus alone is found. Queen M. ibericus in this region were able to produce M. structor males through cloning of sperms stored in their spermatheca and producing hybrid workers by fertilizing her eggs with the cloned sperm. The hybrid workers have a M. structor phenotype with mitochondrial DNA of M. ibericus. This reproductive mode has been termed as "xenoparous", defined by one species being able to produce the offspring of another species.[81]

    Drones can enter a foreign colony and mate with existing queens in some species such as in army ants. When the drone is initially attacked by the workers, it releases a mating pheromone. If recognized as a mate, it will be carried to the queen to mate.[82] Males may also patrol the nest and fight others by grabbing them with their mandibles, piercing their exoskeleton and then marking them with a pheromone. The marked male is interpreted as an invader by worker ants and is killed.[83]

    A Hypoponera worker, likely H. opacior, crawls around in soil under leaf litter.
    A Hypoponera worker, likely H. opacior.

    Most ants are univoltine, producing a new generation each year.[84] During the species-specific breeding period, winged females and winged males, known to entomologists as alates, leave the colony in what is called a nuptial flight. The nuptial flight usually takes place in the late spring or early summer when the weather is hot and humid. Heat makes flying easier, and freshly fallen rain makes the ground softer for mated queens to dig nests.[85] Males typically take flight before the females. Males then use visual cues to find a common mating ground, for example, a landmark such as a pine tree to which other males in the area converge. Males secrete a mating pheromone that females follow. Males will mount females in the air, but the actual mating process usually takes place on the ground. Females of some species mate with just one male but in others they may mate with as many as ten or more different males, storing the sperm in their spermathecae.[86] The genus Cardiocondyla have species with both winged and wingless males, where the latter will only mate with females living in the same nest. Some species in the genus have lost winged males completely, and only produce wingless males.[87] In C. elegans, workers may transport newly emerged queens to other conspecific nests where the wingless males from unrelated colonies can mate with them, a behavioural adaptation that may reduce the chances of inbreeding.[88]

    Hypoponera opacior produces both winged and wingless queens and males. Winged alates mate through nuptial flights in June,[89] but wingless queens and males have a different way of reproduction. During the fall, the wingless queens mate inside the nest. Then, the colony splits and the queen departs with a portion of the colony's workers, in order to start a new colony. The queen must leave the nest, as the workers will try to kill her if she does not.[90] The wingless males mate with the queens while they are still in cocoons, and, unlike Cardiocondyla, do not fight. The males mate with the queens for up to 40 hours, and it is thought that they guard the queens in order to prevent other males from mating with them.[91]

    Fertilised meat-eater ant queen beginning to dig a new colony

    Mated females then seek a suitable place to begin a colony. There, they break off their wings using their tibial spurs and begin to lay and care for eggs. The females can selectively fertilise future eggs with the sperm stored to produce diploid workers or lay unfertilized haploid eggs to produce drones. The first workers to hatch, known as nanitics,[92] are weaker and smaller than later workers but they begin to serve the colony immediately. They enlarge the nest, forage for food, and care for the other eggs. Species that have multiple queens may have a queen leaving the nest along with some workers to found a colony at a new site,[86] a process akin to swarming in honeybees.

    Nests, colonies, and supercolonies

    [edit]

    The typical ant species has a colony occupying a single nest, housing one or more queens, where the brood is raised. There are however more than 150 species of ants in 49 genera that are known to have colonies consisting of multiple spatially separated nests. These polydomous (as opposed to monodomous) colonies have food and workers moving between the nests.[93] Membership to a colony is identified by the response of worker ants which identify whether another individual belongs to their own colony or not. A signature cocktail of body surface chemicals (also known as cuticular hydrocarbons or CHCs) forms the so-called colony odor which other members can recognize.[94] Some ant species appear to be less discriminating; in the Argentine ant Linepithema humile, workers carried from a colony anywhere in the southern US and Mexico are acceptable within other colonies in the same region. Similarly, workers from colonies established in Europe are accepted by any other colonies within Europe, but not by the colonies in the Americas. The interpretation of these observations has been debated and some have been termed these large populations as supercolonies[95][96][97] while others have termed the populations as unicolonial.[98]

    Behaviour and ecology

    [edit]

    Communication

    [edit]
    See also: Ant communication
    Two Camponotus sericeus workers communicating through touch and pheromones
    Ants find a dying white cabbage larvae that parasitoid wasps larvae exited two days earlier.

    Ants communicate with each other using pheromones, sounds, and touch.[99] Since most ants live on the ground, they use the soil surface to leave pheromone trails that may be followed by other ants. In species that forage in groups, a forager that finds food marks a trail on the way back to the colony; this trail is followed by other ants, these ants then reinforce the trail when they head back with food to the colony. When the food source is exhausted, no new trails are marked by returning ants and the scent slowly dissipates. This behaviour helps ants deal with changes in their environment. For instance, when an established path to a food source is blocked by an obstacle, the foragers leave the path to explore new routes. If an ant is successful, it leaves a new trail marking the shortest route on its return. Successful trails are followed by more ants, reinforcing better routes and gradually identifying the best path.[99][100]

    Ants use pheromones for more than just making trails. A crushed ant emits an alarm pheromone that sends nearby ants into an attack frenzy and attracts more ants from farther away. Several ant species even use "propaganda pheromones" to confuse enemy ants and make them fight among themselves.[101] Pheromones are produced by a wide range of structures including Dufour's glands, poison glands and glands on the hindgut, pygidium, rectum, sternum, and hind tibia.[72] Pheromones also are exchanged, mixed with food, and passed by trophallaxis, transferring information within the colony.[102] This allows other ants to detect what task group (e.g., foraging or nest maintenance) other colony members belong to.[103] In ant species with queen castes, when the dominant queen stops producing a specific pheromone, workers begin to raise new queens in the colony.[104]

    Some ants produce sounds by stridulation, using the gaster segments and their mandibles. Sounds may be used to communicate with colony members or with other species.[105][106]

    Defence

    [edit]
    See also: Defense in insects
    A Plectroctena sp. attacks another of its kind to protect its territory.

    Ants attack and defend themselves by biting and, in many species, by stinging often injecting or spraying chemicals. Bullet ants (Paraponera), located in Central and South America, are considered to have the most painful sting of any insect, although it is usually not fatal to humans. This sting is given the highest rating on the Schmidt sting pain index.[107]

    The sting of jack jumper ants can be lethal for humans,[108] and an antivenom has been developed for it.[109] Fire ants, Solenopsis spp., are unique in having a venom sac containing piperidine alkaloids.[110] Their stings are painful and can be dangerous to hypersensitive people.[111] Formicine ants secrete a poison from their glands, made mainly of formic acid.[112]

    A weaver ant in fighting position, mandibles wide open

    Trap-jaw ants of the genus Odontomachus are equipped with mandibles called trap-jaws, which snap shut faster than any other predatory appendages within the animal kingdom.[113] One study of Odontomachus bauri recorded peak speeds of between 126 and 230 km/h (78 and 143 mph), with the jaws closing within 130 microseconds on average. The ants were also observed to use their jaws as a catapult to eject intruders or fling themselves backward to escape a threat.[113] Before striking, the ant opens its mandibles extremely widely and locks them in this position by an internal mechanism. Energy is stored in a thick band of muscle and explosively released when triggered by the stimulation of sensory organs resembling hairs on the inside of the mandibles. The mandibles also permit slow and fine movements for other tasks. Trap-jaws also are seen in other ponerines such as Anochetus, as well as some genera in the tribe Attini, such as Daceton, Orectognathus, and Strumigenys,[113][114] which are viewed as examples of convergent evolution.

    A Malaysian species of ant in the Camponotus cylindricus group has enlarged mandibular glands that extend into their gaster. If combat takes a turn for the worse, a worker may perform a final act of suicidal altruism by rupturing the membrane of its gaster, causing the content of its mandibular glands to burst from the anterior region of its head, spraying a poisonous, corrosive secretion containing acetophenones and other chemicals that immobilise small insect attackers. The worker subsequently dies.[115]

    Ant mound holes prevent water from entering the nest during rain.

    In addition to defence against predators, ants need to protect their colonies from pathogens. Secretions from the metapleural gland, unique to the ants, produce a complex range of chemicals including several with antibiotic properties.[116] Some worker ants maintain the hygiene of the colony and their activities include undertaking or necrophoresis, the disposal of dead nest-mates.[117] Oleic acid has been identified as the compound released from dead ants that triggers necrophoric behaviour in Atta mexicana[118] while workers of Linepithema humile react to the absence of characteristic chemicals (dolichodial and iridomyrmecin) present on the cuticle of their living nestmates to trigger similar behaviour.[119] In Megaponera analis, injured ants are treated by nestmastes with secretions from their metapleural glands which protect them from infection.[120] Camponotus ants do not have a metapleural gland[116] and Camponotus maculatus as well as C. floridanus workers have been found to amputate the affected legs of nestmates when the femur is injured. A femur injury carries a greater risk of infection unlike a tibia injury.[121]

    Nests may be protected from physical threats such as flooding and overheating by elaborate nest architecture.[122][123] Workers of Cataulacus muticus, an arboreal species that lives in plant hollows, respond to flooding by drinking water inside the nest, and excreting it outside.[124] Camponotus anderseni, which nests in the cavities of wood in mangrove habitats, deals with submergence under water by switching to anaerobic respiration.[125]

    Learning

    [edit]
    Two Weaver ants walking in tandem

    Many animals can learn behaviours by imitation, but ants may be the only group apart from mammals where interactive teaching has been observed. A knowledgeable forager of Temnothorax albipennis can lead a naïve nest-mate to newly discovered food by the process of tandem running. The follower obtains knowledge through its leading tutor. The leader is acutely sensitive to the progress of the follower and slows down when the follower lags and speeds up when the follower gets too close.[126]

    Controlled experiments with colonies of Cerapachys biroi suggest that an individual may choose nest roles based on her previous experience. An entire generation of identical workers was divided into two groups whose outcome in food foraging was controlled. One group was continually rewarded with prey, while it was made certain that the other failed. As a result, members of the successful group intensified their foraging attempts while the unsuccessful group ventured out fewer and fewer times. A month later, the successful foragers continued in their role while the others had moved to specialise in brood care.[127]

    Nest construction

    [edit]
    Main article: Ant colony
    Leaf nest of weaver ants, Pamalican, Philippines

    Complex nests are built by many ant species, but other species are nomadic and do not build permanent structures. Ants may form subterranean nests or build them on trees. These nests may be found in the ground, under stones or logs, inside logs, hollow stems, or even acorns. The materials used for construction include soil and plant matter,[86] and ants carefully select their nest sites; Temnothorax albipennis will avoid sites with dead ants, as these may indicate the presence of pests or disease. They are quick to abandon established nests at the first sign of threats.[128]

    The army ants of South America, such as the Eciton burchellii species, and the driver ants of Africa do not build permanent nests, but instead, alternate between nomadism and stages where the workers form a temporary nest (bivouac) from their own bodies, by holding each other together.[129]

    Weaver ant (Oecophylla spp.) workers build nests in trees by attaching leaves together, first pulling them together with bridges of workers and then inducing their larvae to produce silk as they are moved along the leaf edges. Similar forms of nest construction are seen in some species of Polyrhachis.[130]

    Ant bridge

    Formica polyctena, among other ant species, constructs nests that maintain a relatively constant interior temperature that aids in the development of larvae. The ants maintain the nest temperature by choosing the location, nest materials, controlling ventilation and maintaining the heat from solar radiation, worker activity and metabolism, and in some moist nests, microbial activity in the nest materials.[131][132]

    Some ant species, such as those that use natural cavities, can be opportunistic and make use of the controlled micro-climate provided inside human dwellings and other artificial structures to house their colonies and nest structures.[133][134]

    Cultivation of food

    [edit]
    Main article: Ant–fungus mutualism
    Myrmecocystus, honeypot ants, store food to prevent colony famine.

    Most ants are generalist predators, scavengers, and indirect herbivores,[21] but a few have evolved specialised ways of obtaining nutrition. It is believed that many ant species that engage in indirect herbivory rely on specialized symbiosis with their gut microbes[135] to upgrade the nutritional value of the food they collect[136] and allow them to survive in nitrogen poor regions, such as rainforest canopies.[137] Leafcutter ants (Atta and Acromyrmex) feed exclusively on a fungus that grows only within their colonies. They continually collect leaves which are taken to the colony, cut into tiny pieces and placed in fungal gardens. Ergates specialise in related tasks according to their sizes. The largest ants cut stalks, smaller workers chew the leaves and the smallest tend the fungus. Leafcutter ants are sensitive enough to recognise the reaction of the fungus to different plant material, apparently detecting chemical signals from the fungus. If a particular type of leaf is found to be toxic to the fungus, the colony will no longer collect it. The ants feed on structures produced by the fungi called gongylidia. Symbiotic bacteria on the exterior surface of the ants produce antibiotics that kill bacteria introduced into the nest that may harm the fungi.[138]

    Navigation

    [edit]
    An ant trail

    Foraging ants travel distances of up to 200 metres (700 ft) from their nest[139] and scent trails allow them to find their way back even in the dark. In hot and arid regions, day-foraging ants face death by desiccation, so the ability to find the shortest route back to the nest reduces that risk. Diurnal desert ants of the genus Cataglyphis such as the Sahara desert ant navigate by keeping track of direction as well as distance travelled. Distances travelled are measured using an internal pedometer that keeps count of the steps taken[140] and also by evaluating the movement of objects in their visual field (optical flow).[141] Directions are measured using the position of the sun.[142] They integrate this information to find the shortest route back to their nest.[143] Like all ants, they can also make use of visual landmarks when available[144] as well as olfactory and tactile cues to navigate.[145][146] Some species of ant are able to use the Earth's magnetic field for navigation.[147] The compound eyes of ants have specialised cells that detect polarised light from the Sun, which is used to determine direction.[148][149] These polarization detectors are sensitive in the ultraviolet region of the light spectrum.[150] In some army ant species, a group of foragers who become separated from the main column may sometimes turn back on themselves and form a circular ant mill. The workers may then run around continuously until they die of exhaustion.[151]

    Locomotion

    [edit]

    The female worker ants do not have wings and reproductive females lose their wings after their mating flights in order to begin their colonies. Therefore, unlike their wasp ancestors, most ants travel by walking. Some species are capable of leaping. For example, Jerdon's jumping ant (Harpegnathos saltator) is able to jump by synchronising the action of its mid and hind pairs of legs.[152] There are several species of gliding ant including Cephalotes atratus; this may be a common trait among arboreal ants with small colonies. Ants with this ability are able to control their horizontal movement so as to catch tree trunks when they fall from atop the forest canopy.[153]

    Other species of ants can form chains to bridge gaps over water, underground, or through spaces in vegetation. Some species also form floating rafts that help them survive floods.[154] These rafts may also have a role in allowing ants to colonise islands.[155] Polyrhachis sokolova, a species of ant found in Australian mangrove swamps, can swim and live in underwater nests. Since they lack gills, they go to trapped pockets of air in the submerged nests to breathe.[156]

    Cooperation and competition

    [edit]
    Meat-eater ants feeding on a cicada: social ants cooperate and collectively gather food

    Not all ants have the same kind of societies. The Australian bulldog ants are among the biggest and most basal of ants. Like virtually all ants, they are eusocial, but their social behaviour is poorly developed compared to other species. Each individual hunts alone, using her large eyes instead of chemical senses to find prey.[157]

    Some species attack and take over neighbouring ant colonies. Extreme specialists among these slave-raiding ants, such as the Amazon ants, are incapable of feeding themselves and need captured workers to survive.[158] Captured workers of enslaved Temnothorax species have evolved a counter-strategy, destroying just the female pupae of the slave-making Temnothorax americanus, but sparing the males (who do not take part in slave-raiding as adults).[159]

    A worker Harpegnathos saltator (a jumping ant) engaged in battle with a rival colony's queen (on top)

    Ants identify kin and nestmates through their scent, which comes from hydrocarbon-laced secretions that coat their exoskeletons. If an ant is separated from its original colony, it will eventually lose the colony scent. Any ant that enters a colony without a matching scent will be attacked.[160]

    Parasitic ant species enter the colonies of host ants and establish themselves as social parasites; species such as Strumigenys xenos are entirely parasitic and do not have workers, but instead, rely on the food gathered by their Strumigenys perplexa hosts.[161][162] This form of parasitism is seen across many ant genera, but the parasitic ant is usually a species that is closely related to its host. A variety of methods are employed to enter the nest of the host ant. A parasitic queen may enter the host nest before the first brood has hatched, establishing herself prior to development of a colony scent. Other species use pheromones to confuse the host ants or to trick them into carrying the parasitic queen into the nest. Some simply fight their way into the nest.[163]

    A conflict between the sexes of a species is seen in some species of ants with these reproducers apparently competing to produce offspring that are as closely related to them as possible. The most extreme form involves the production of clonal offspring. An extreme of sexual conflict is seen in Wasmannia auropunctata, where the queens produce diploid daughters by thelytokous parthenogenesis and males produce clones by a process whereby a diploid egg loses its maternal contribution to produce haploid males who are clones of the father.[164]

    Relationships with other organisms

    [edit]
    The spider Myrmarachne plataleoides (female shown) mimics weaver ants to avoid predators.

    Ants form symbiotic associations with a range of species, including other ant species, other insects, plants, and fungi. They also are preyed on by many animals and even certain fungi. Some arthropod species spend part of their lives within ant nests, either preying on ants, their larvae, and eggs, consuming the food stores of the ants, or avoiding predators. These inquilines may bear a close resemblance to ants. The nature of this ant mimicry (myrmecomorphy) varies, with some cases involving Batesian mimicry, where the mimic reduces the risk of predation. Others show Wasmannian mimicry, a form of mimicry seen only in inquilines.[165][166]

    An ant collects honeydew from an aphid
    Ants collecting honeydew from Calico scales (Eulecanium cerasorum) then played at 30 times speed to show the pumping action of the scale.

    Aphids and other hemipteran insects secrete a sweet liquid called honeydew, when they feed on plant sap. The sugars in honeydew are a high-energy food source, which many ant species collect.[167] In some cases, the aphids secrete the honeydew in response to ants tapping them with their antennae. The ants in turn keep predators away from the aphids and will move them from one feeding location to another. When migrating to a new area, many colonies will take the aphids with them, to ensure a continued supply of honeydew. Ants also tend mealybugs to harvest their honeydew. Mealybugs may become a serious pest of pineapples if ants are present to protect mealybugs from their natural enemies.[168]

    Myrmecophilous (ant-loving) caterpillars of the butterfly family Lycaenidae (e.g., blues, coppers, or hairstreaks) are herded by the ants, led to feeding areas in the daytime, and brought inside the ants' nest at night. The caterpillars have a gland which secretes honeydew when the ants massage them. The chemicals in the secretions of Narathura japonica alter the behavior of attendant Pristomyrmex punctatus workers, making them less aggressive and stationary. The relationship, formerly characterized as "mutualistic", is now considered as possibly a case of the ants being parasitically manipulated by the caterpillars.[169] Some caterpillars produce vibrations and sounds that are perceived by the ants.[170] A similar adaptation can be seen in Grizzled skipper butterflies that emit vibrations by expanding their wings in order to communicate with ants, which are natural predators of these butterflies.[171] Other caterpillars have evolved from ant-loving to ant-eating: these myrmecophagous caterpillars secrete a pheromone that makes the ants act as if the caterpillar is one of their own larvae. The caterpillar is then taken into the ant nest where it feeds on the ant larvae.[172] A number of specialized bacteria have been found as endosymbionts in ant guts. Some of the dominant bacteria belong to the order Hyphomicrobiales whose members are known for being nitrogen-fixing symbionts in legumes but the species found in ant lack the ability to fix nitrogen.[173][174] Fungus-growing ants that make up the tribe Attini, including leafcutter ants, cultivate certain species of fungus in the genera Leucoagaricus or Leucocoprinus of the family Agaricaceae. In this ant-fungus mutualism, both species depend on each other for survival. The ant Allomerus decemarticulatus has evolved a three-way association with the host plant, Hirtella physophora (Chrysobalanaceae), and a sticky fungus which is used to trap their insect prey.[175]

    Ants, like this group of Crematogaster workers, may obtain nectar from flowers such as the dandelion, but are only rarely known to pollinate flowers.
    Ants tending aphids and collecting honeydew secreted. A wrinkled solder beetle flies in and eats an aphid before being chased away by the ants.

    Lemon ants make devil's gardens by killing surrounding plants with their stings and leaving a pure patch of lemon ant trees, (Duroia hirsuta). This modification of the forest provides the ants with more nesting sites inside the stems of the Duroia trees.[176] Although some ants obtain nectar from flowers, pollination by ants is somewhat rare, one example being of the pollination of the orchid Leporella fimbriata which induces male Myrmecia urens to pseudocopulate with the flowers, transferring pollen in the process.[177] One theory that has been proposed for the rarity of pollination is that the secretions of the metapleural gland inactivate and reduce the viability of pollen.[178][179] Some plants, mostly angiosperms but also some ferns,[180] have special nectar exuding structures, extrafloral nectaries, that provide food for ants, which in turn protect the plant from more damaging herbivorous insects.[181] Species such as the bullhorn acacia (Acacia cornigera) in Central America have hollow thorns that house colonies of stinging ants (Pseudomyrmex ferruginea) who defend the tree against insects, browsing mammals, and epiphytic vines. Isotopic labelling studies suggest that plants also obtain nitrogen from the ants.[182] In return, the ants obtain food from protein- and lipid-rich Beltian bodies. In Fiji Philidris nagasau (Dolichoderinae) are known to selectively grow species of epiphytic Squamellaria (Rubiaceae) which produce large domatia inside which the ant colonies nest. The ants plant the seeds and the domatia of young seedling are immediately occupied and the ant faeces in them contribute to rapid growth.[183] Similar dispersal associations are found with other dolichoderines in the region as well.[184] Another example of this type of ectosymbiosis comes from the Macaranga tree, which has stems adapted to house colonies of Crematogaster ants.[185]

    Many plant species have seeds that are adapted for dispersal by ants.[186] Seed dispersal by ants or myrmecochory is widespread, and new estimates suggest that nearly 9% of all plant species may have such ant associations.[187][186] Often, seed-dispersing ants perform directed dispersal, depositing the seeds in locations that increase the likelihood of seed survival to reproduction.[188] Some plants in arid, fire-prone systems are particularly dependent on ants for their survival and dispersal as the seeds are transported to safety below the ground.[189] Many ant-dispersed seeds have special external structures, elaiosomes, that are sought after by ants as food.[190] Ants can substantially alter rate of decomposition and nutrient cycling in their nest.[191][192] By myrmecochory and modification of soil conditions they substantially alter vegetation and nutrient cycling in surrounding ecosystem.[193]

    A convergence, possibly a form of mimicry, is seen in the eggs of stick insects. They have an edible elaiosome-like structure and are taken into the ant nest where the young hatch.[194]

    A meat ant tending a common leafhopper nymph
    Bold Jumping Spider (Phidippus audax) with a cutworm (tribe Noctuini) and then lost to ants (Family Formicidae)
    Ants from different colonies steal the cranefly that a pair of Long-jawed orb weaver spiders were consuming.

    Most ants are predatory and some prey on and obtain food from other social insects including other ants. Some species specialise in preying on termites (Megaponera and Termitopone) while a few Cerapachyinae prey on other ants.[139] Some termites, including Nasutitermes corniger, form associations with certain ant species to keep away predatory ant species.[195] The tropical wasp Mischocyttarus drewseni coats the pedicel of its nest with an ant-repellent chemical.[196] It is suggested that many tropical wasps may build their nests in trees and cover them to protect themselves from ants. Other wasps, such as A. multipicta, defend against ants by blasting them off the nest with bursts of wing buzzing.[197] Stingless bees (Trigona and Melipona) use chemical defences against ants.[139]

    Flies in the Old World genus Bengalia (Calliphoridae) prey on ants and are kleptoparasites, snatching prey or brood from the mandibles of adult ants.[198] Wingless and legless females of the Malaysian phorid fly (Vestigipoda myrmolarvoidea) live in the nests of ants of the genus Aenictus and are cared for by the ants.[198]

    Oecophylla smaragdina killed by a fungus

    Fungi in the genera Cordyceps and Ophiocordyceps infect ants. Ants react to their infection by climbing up plants and sinking their mandibles into plant tissue. The fungus kills the ants, grows on their remains, and produces a fruiting body. It appears that the fungus alters the behaviour of the ant to help disperse its spores[199] in a microhabitat that best suits the fungus.[200] Strepsipteran parasites also manipulate their ant host to climb grass stems, to help the parasite find mates.[201]

    A nematode (Myrmeconema neotropicum) that infects canopy ants (Cephalotes atratus) causes the black-coloured gasters of workers to turn red. The parasite also alters the behaviour of the ant, causing them to carry their gasters high. The conspicuous red gasters are mistaken by birds for ripe fruits, such as Hyeronima alchorneoides, and eaten. The droppings of the bird are collected by other ants and fed to their young, leading to further spread of the nematode.[202]

    Spiders (Like this Menemerus jumping spider) sometimes feed on ants

    A study of Temnothorax nylanderi colonies in Germany found that workers parasitized by the tapeworm Anomotaenia brevis (ants are intermediate hosts, the definitive hosts are woodpeckers) lived much longer than unparasitized workers and had a reduced mortality rate, comparable to that of the queens of the same species, which live for as long as two decades.[203]

    South American poison dart frogs in the genus Dendrobates feed mainly on ants, and the toxins in the skin of some species come from the ants.[204][205] Formicine ants in the genera Brachymyrmex and Paratrechina have been found to contain pumiliotoxin found in Dendrobates pumilio.[206] The West African frog Phrynomantis microps is able to move within the nests of Paltothyreus tarsatus ants, producing peptides on its skin that prevent the ants from stinging them.[207]

    Army ants forage in a wide roving column, attacking any animals in that path that are unable to escape. In Central and South America, Eciton burchellii is the swarming ant most commonly attended by "ant-following" birds such as antbirds and woodcreepers.[208][209] This behaviour was once considered mutualistic, but later studies found the birds to be parasitic. Direct kleptoparasitism (birds stealing food from the ants' grasp) is rare and has been noted in Inca doves which pick seeds at nest entrances as they are being transported by species of Pogonomyrmex.[210] Birds that follow ants eat many prey insects and thus decrease the foraging success of ants.[211] Birds indulge in a peculiar behaviour called anting that, as yet, is not fully understood. Here birds rest on ant nests, or pick and drop ants onto their wings and feathers; this may be a means to remove ectoparasites from the birds.

    Anteaters, aardvarks, pangolins, echidnas and numbats have special adaptations for living on a diet of ants. These adaptations include long, sticky tongues to capture ants and strong claws to break into ant nests. Brown bears (Ursus arctos) have been found to feed on ants. About 12%, 16%, and 4% of their faecal volume in spring, summer and autumn, respectively, is composed of ants.[212]

    Relationship with humans

    [edit]
    Weaver ants are used as a biological control for citrus cultivation in southern China.

    Ants perform many ecological roles that are beneficial to humans, including the suppression of pest populations and aeration of the soil. It has been estimated that an average of about 1.5 tons of subsoil are moved to the surface (bioturbation) by ants per year per hectare.[213] The use of weaver ants in citrus cultivation in southern China is considered one of the oldest known applications of biological control.[214] On the other hand, ants may become nuisances when they invade buildings or cause economic losses.

    In some parts of the world (mainly Africa and South America), large ants, especially army ants, are used as surgical sutures. The wound is pressed together and ants are applied along it. The ant seizes the edges of the wound in its mandibles and locks in place. The body is then cut off and the head and mandibles remain in place to close the wound.[215][216][217] The large heads of the dinergates (soldiers) of the leafcutting ant Atta cephalotes are also used by native surgeons in closing wounds.[218]

    Some ants have toxic venom and are of medical importance. The species include Paraponera clavata (tocandira) and Dinoponera spp. (false tocandiras) of South America[219] and the Myrmecia ants of Australia.[220]

    In South Africa, ants are used to help harvest the seeds of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis), a plant used to make a herbal tea. The plant disperses its seeds widely, making manual collection difficult. Black ants collect and store these and other seeds in their nest, where humans can gather them en masse. Up to half a pound (200 g) of seeds may be collected from one ant-heap.[221][222]

    Although most ants survive attempts by humans to eradicate them, a few are highly endangered. These tend to be island species that have evolved specialized traits and risk being displaced by introduced ant species. Examples include the critically endangered Sri Lankan relict ant (Aneuretus simoni) and Adetomyrma venatrix of Madagascar.[223]

    As food

    [edit]
    See also: Entomophagy
    Roasted ants in Colombia
    Ant larvae for sale in Isaan, Thailand

    Ants and their larvae are eaten in different parts of the world. The eggs of two species of ants are used in Mexican escamoles. They are considered a form of insect caviar and can sell for as much as US$50 per kg going up to US$200 per kg (as of 2006) because they are seasonal and hard to find.[224] In the Colombian department of Santander, hormigas culonas (roughly interpreted as "large-bottomed ants") Atta laevigata are toasted alive and eaten.[225] In areas of India, and throughout Burma and Thailand, a paste of the green weaver ant (Oecophylla smaragdina) is served as a condiment with curry.[226] Weaver ant eggs and larvae, as well as the ants, may be used in a Thai salad, yam (Thai: ยำ), in a dish called yam khai mot daeng (Thai: ยำไข่มดแดง) or red ant egg salad, a dish that comes from the Issan or north-eastern region of Thailand. Saville-Kent, in the Naturalist in Australia wrote "Beauty, in the case of the green ant, is more than skin-deep. Their attractive, almost sweetmeat-like translucency possibly invited the first essays at their consumption by the human species". Mashed up in water, after the manner of lemon squash, "these ants form a pleasant acid drink which is held in high favor by the natives of North Queensland, and is even appreciated by many European palates".[227] Ants or their pupae are used as starters for yogurt making in parts of Bulgaria and Turkey.[228]

    In his First Summer in the Sierra, John Muir notes that the Digger Indians of California ate the tickling, acid gasters of the large jet-black carpenter ants. The Mexican Indians eat the repletes, or living honey-pots, of the honey ant (Myrmecocystus).[227]

    As pests

    [edit]
    See also: Ants of medical importance
    The tiny pharaoh ant is a major pest in hospitals and office blocks; it can make nests between sheets of paper.

    Some ant species are considered as pests, primarily those that occur in human habitations, where their presence is often problematic. For example, the presence of ants would be undesirable in sterile places such as hospitals or kitchens. Some species or genera commonly categorized as pests include the Argentine ant, immigrant pavement ant, yellow crazy ant, banded sugar ant, pharaoh ant, red wood ant, black carpenter ant, odorous house ant, red imported fire ant, and European fire ant. Some ants will raid stored food, some will seek water sources, others may damage indoor structures, some may damage agricultural crops directly or by aiding sucking pests. Some will sting or bite.[229] The adaptive nature of ant colonies make it nearly impossible to eliminate entire colonies and most pest management practices aim to control local populations and tend to be temporary solutions. Ant populations are managed by a combination of approaches that make use of chemical, biological, and physical methods. Chemical methods include the use of insecticidal bait which is gathered by ants as food and brought back to the nest where the poison is inadvertently spread to other colony members through trophallaxis. Management is based on the species and techniques may vary according to the location and circumstance.[229]

    In science and technology

    [edit]
    See also: Myrmecology, Biomimetics, and Ant colony optimization algorithms
    Camponotus nearcticus workers travelling between two formicaria through connector tubing

    Observed by humans since the dawn of history, the behaviour of ants has been documented and the subject of early writings and fables passed from one century to another. Those using scientific methods, myrmecologists, study ants in the laboratory and in their natural conditions. Their complex and variable social structures have made ants ideal model organisms. Ultraviolet vision was first discovered in ants by Sir John Lubbock in 1881.[230] Studies on ants have tested hypotheses in ecology and sociobiology, and have been particularly important in examining the predictions of theories of kin selection and evolutionarily stable strategies.[231] Ant colonies may be studied by rearing or temporarily maintaining them in formicaria, specially constructed glass framed enclosures.[232] Individuals may be tracked for study by marking them with dots of colours.[233]

    The successful techniques used by ant colonies have been studied in computer science and robotics to produce distributed and fault-tolerant systems for solving problems, for example Ant colony optimization and Ant robotics. This area of biomimetics has led to studies of ant locomotion, search engines that make use of "foraging trails", fault-tolerant storage, and networking algorithms.[234]

    As pets

    [edit]
    Main article: Ant-keeping

    From the late 1950s through the late 1970s, ant farms were popular educational children's toys in the United States. Some later commercial versions use transparent gel instead of soil, allowing greater visibility at the cost of stressing the ants with unnatural light.[235]

    In culture

    [edit]
    Aesop's ants

    Anthropomorphised ants have often been used in fables, children's stories, and religious texts to represent industriousness and cooperative effort, such as in the Aesop fable The Ant and the Grasshopper.[236][237] In the Quran, Sulayman is said to have heard and understood an ant warning other ants to return home to avoid being accidentally crushed by Sulayman and his marching army.[Quran 27:18],[238][239] In parts of Africa, ants are considered to be the messengers of the deities. Some Native American mythology, such as the Hopi mythology, considers ants as the first animals. Ant bites are often said to have curative properties. The sting of some species of Pseudomyrmex is claimed to give fever relief.[240] Ant bites are used in the initiation ceremonies of some Amazon Indian cultures as a test of endurance.[241][242] In Greek mythology, the goddess Athena turned the maiden Myrmex into an ant when the latter claimed to have invented the plough, when in fact it was Athena's own invention.[243]

    An ant pictured in the coat of arms of Multia, a town in Finland

    Ant society has always fascinated humans and has been written about both humorously and seriously. Mark Twain wrote about ants in his 1880 book A Tramp Abroad.[244] Some modern authors have used the example of the ants to comment on the relationship between society and the individual. Examples are Robert Frost in his poem "Departmental" and T. H. White in his fantasy novel The Once and Future King. The plot in French entomologist and writer Bernard Werber's Les Fourmis science-fiction trilogy is divided between the worlds of ants and humans; ants and their behaviour are described using contemporary scientific knowledge. H. G. Wells wrote about intelligent ants destroying human settlements in Brazil and threatening human civilization in his 1905 science-fiction short story, The Empire of the Ants. A similar German story involving army ants, Leiningen Versus the Ants, was written in 1937 and recreated in movie form as The Naked Jungle in 1954.[245] In more recent times, animated cartoons and 3-D animated films featuring ants have been produced including Antz, A Bug's Life, The Ant Bully, The Ant and the Aardvark, Ferdy the Ant and Atom Ant. Renowned myrmecologist E. O. Wilson wrote a short story, "Trailhead" in 2010 for The New Yorker magazine, which describes the life and death of an ant-queen and the rise and fall of her colony, from an ants' point of view.[246]

    Ants also are quite popular inspiration for many science-fiction insectoids, such as the Formics of Ender's Game, the Bugs of Starship Troopers, the giant ants in the films Them! and Empire of the Ants, Marvel Comics' super hero Ant-Man, and ants mutated into super-intelligence in Phase IV. In computer strategy games, ant-based species often benefit from increased production rates due to their single-minded focus, such as the Klackons in the Master of Orion series of games or the ChCht in Deadlock II. These characters are often credited with a hive mind, a common misconception about ant colonies.[247] In the early 1990s, the video game SimAnt, which simulated an ant colony, won the 1992 Codie award for "Best Simulation Program".[248]

    See also

    [edit]
    Main article: Outline of ants
    • Glossary of ant terms
    • International Union for the Study of Social Insects
    • Myrmecological News (journal)
    • Task allocation and partitioning in social insects

    References

    [edit]
    1. ^ a b Brendon E. Boudinot; Vincent Perrichot; Júlio C. M. Chaul (December 2020). "†Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea)". ZooKeys (1005): 21–55. Bibcode:2020ZooK.1005...21B. doi:10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629. PMC 7762752. PMID 33390754.
    2. ^ Franks, Nigel R. (2009). "Chapter 7 - Ants". In Resh, Vincent H.; Cardé, Ring T. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Insects (Second Edition). Academic Press. pp. 24–27. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-374144-8.00007-2. ISBN 978-0-12-374144-8.
    3. ^ emmet. Merriam-Webster Dictionary
    4. ^ "ant". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved 6 June 2008.
    5. ^ "Ant. Online Etymology Dictionary". Retrieved 30 May 2009.
    6. ^ Simpson DP (1979). Cassell's Latin Dictionary (5th ed.). London: Cassell. ISBN 978-0-304-52257-6.
    7. ^ "Formic". Etymonline.com. Retrieved 30 January 2012.
    8. ^ "Pismire". Etymonline.com. Retrieved 27 August 2020.
    9. ^ a b Johnson BR, Borowiec ML, Chiu JC, Lee EK, Atallah J, Ward PS (October 2013). "Phylogenomics resolves evolutionary relationships among ants, bees, and wasps". Current Biology. 23 (20): 2058–2062. Bibcode:2013CBio...23.2058J. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.050. PMID 24094856.
    10. ^ a b c Fernando Fernández; Roberto J. Guerrero; Andrés F. Sánchez Restrepo (April 2021). "Systematics and diversity of Neotropical ants". Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 47 (1) e11082. doi:10.25100/socolen.v47i1.11082. hdl:11336/165214.
    11. ^ Borowiec, Marek L.; Moreau, Corrie S.; Rabeling, Christian (2020). "Ants: Phylogeny and Classification". In Starr, Christopher K. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Social Insects. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–18. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_155-1. ISBN 978-3-319-90306-4. S2CID 219873464. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
    12. ^ a b Ward PS (2007). "Phylogeny, classification, and species-level taxonomy of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)" (PDF). Zootaxa. 1668: 549–563. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1668.1.26. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    13. ^ a b Rabeling C, Brown JM, Verhaagh M (September 2008). "Newly discovered sister lineage sheds light on early ant evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (39): 14913–14917. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10514913R. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806187105. PMC 2567467. PMID 18794530.
    14. ^ Brady SG, Fisher BL, Schultz TR, Ward PS (May 2014). "The rise of army ants and their relatives: diversification of specialized predatory doryline ants". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 14 (93): 93. Bibcode:2014BMCEE..14...93B. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-93. PMC 4021219. PMID 24886136.
    15. ^ Wilson EO, Carpenter FM, Brown WL (September 1967). "The first mesozoic ants". Science. 157 (3792): 1038–1040. Bibcode:1967Sci...157.1038W. doi:10.1126/science.157.3792.1038. PMID 17770424. S2CID 43155424.
    16. ^ Boudinot, Brendon E; Richter, Adrian; Katzke, Julian; Chaul, Júlio C M; Keller, Roberto A; Economo, Evan P; Beutel, Rolf Georg; Yamamoto, Shûhei (29 July 2022). "Evidence for the evolution of eusociality in stem ants and a systematic revision of † Gerontoformica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 195 (4): 1355–1389. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab097. hdl:10451/55807. ISSN 0024-4082.
    17. ^ Lepeco, Anderson; Meira, Odair M.; Matielo, Diego M.; Brandão, Carlos R.F.; Camacho, Gabriela P. (April 2025). "A hell ant from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil". Current Biology. 35 (9): 2146–2153.e2. Bibcode:2025CBio...35.2146L. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.03.023. PMID 40280133.
    18. ^ Jouault, Corentin; Condamine, Fabien L.; Legendre, Frédéric; Perrichot, Vincent (11 March 2024). "The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution buffered ants against extinction". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 121 (13) e2317795121. Bibcode:2024PNAS..12117795J. doi:10.1073/pnas.2317795121. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 10990090. PMID 38466878.
    19. ^ a b Grimaldi D, Agosti D (December 2000). "A formicine in New Jersey cretaceous amber (Hymenoptera: formicidae) and early evolution of the ants". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97 (25): 13678–13683. Bibcode:2000PNAS...9713678G. doi:10.1073/pnas.240452097. PMC 17635. PMID 11078527.
    20. ^ Moreau CS, Bell CD, Vila R, Archibald SB, Pierce NE (April 2006). "Phylogeny of the ants: diversification in the age of angiosperms". Science. 312 (5770): 101–104. Bibcode:2006Sci...312..101M. doi:10.1126/science.1124891. PMID 16601190. S2CID 20729380.
    21. ^ a b Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (May 2005). "The rise of the ants: a phylogenetic and ecological explanation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102 (21): 7411–7414. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.7411W. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502264102. PMC 1140440. PMID 15899976.
    22. ^ LaPolla JS, Dlussky GM, Perrichot V (2013). "Ants and the fossil record". Annual Review of Entomology. 58: 609–730. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100600. PMID 23317048. S2CID 40555356.
    23. ^ Barden P, Grimaldi D (2012). "Rediscovery of the bizarre Cretaceous ant Haidomyrmex Dlussky (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with two new species" (PDF). American Museum Novitates (3755): 1–16. doi:10.1206/3755.2. hdl:2246/6368. S2CID 83598305. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 April 2013. Retrieved 5 May 2013.
    24. ^ Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), pp. 23–24
    25. ^ Thorne BL (1997). "Evolution of eusociality in termites" (PDF). Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 (5): 27–53. Bibcode:1997AnRES..28...27T. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.27. PMC 349550. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 May 2010.
    26. ^ "Order Isoptera – Termites". Iowa State University Entomology. 16 February 2004. Archived from the original on 15 June 2008. Retrieved 12 June 2008.
    27. ^ "Family Mutillidae – Velvet ants". Iowa State University Entomology. 16 February 2004. Archived from the original on 30 June 2008. Retrieved 12 June 2008.
    28. ^ Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), p. 4
    29. ^ Jones, Alice S. "Fantastic ants – Did you know?". National Geographic Magazine. Archived from the original on 30 July 2008. Retrieved 5 July 2008.
    30. ^ Thomas, Philip (2007). "Pest Ants in Hawaii". Hawaiian Ecosystems at Risk project (HEAR). Retrieved 6 July 2008.
    31. ^ Fayle, Tom M.; Klimes, Petr (18 October 2022). "Improving estimates of global ant biomass and abundance". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (42) e2214825119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11914825F. doi:10.1073/pnas.2214825119. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 9586285. PMID 36197959.
    32. ^ Holldobler B, Wilson EO (2009). The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. New York: W.W. Norton. p. 5. ISBN 978-0-393-06704-0.
    33. ^ Schultz TR (December 2000). "In search of ant ancestors". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97 (26): 14028–14029. Bibcode:2000PNAS...9714028S. doi:10.1073/pnas.011513798. PMC 34089. PMID 11106367.
    34. ^ "How many ants are there for every one person on earth?". info.com. Archived from the original on 13 August 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2013.
    35. ^ Schultheiss, Patrick; Nooten, Sabine S.; Wang, Runxi; Wong, Mark K. L.; Brassard, François; Guénard, Benoit (4 October 2022). "The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (40) e2201550119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11901550S. doi:10.1073/pnas.2201550119. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 9546634. PMID 36122199. S2CID 252381912.
    36. ^ Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), p. 589
    37. ^ Shattuck SO (1999). Australian ants: their biology and identification. Collingwood, Vic: CSIRO. p. 149. ISBN 978-0-643-06659-5.
    38. ^ Schaal, Stephan (27 January 2006). "Messel". Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0004143. ISBN 978-0-470-01617-6.
    39. ^ a b AntWeb
    40. ^ Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso JE, Schultz TR, eds. (2000). Ants: Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press. Retrieved 13 December 2015.
    41. ^ Johnson NF (2007). "Hymenoptera name server". Ohio State University. Archived from the original on 27 January 2016. Retrieved 6 July 2008.
    42. ^ Borror, Triplehorn & Delong (1989), p. 737
    43. ^ Ouellette, Gary D.; Fisher, Brian L.; Girman, Derek J. (2006). "Molecular systematics of basal subfamilies of ants using 28S rRNA (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 40 (2): 359–369. Bibcode:2006MolPE..40..359O. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.017. hdl:10211.1/1549. ISSN 1055-7903. PMID 16630727.
    44. ^ a b c d Borror, Triplehorn & Delong (1989), pp. 24–71
    45. ^ Fent K, Wehner R (April 1985). "Oceili: a celestial compass in the desert ant cataglyphis". Science. 228 (4696): 192–194. Bibcode:1985Sci...228..192F. doi:10.1126/science.228.4696.192. PMID 17779641. S2CID 33242108.
    46. ^ Palavalli-Nettimi R, Narendra A (April 2018). "Miniaturisation decreases visual navigational competence in ants". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 221 (Pt 7) jeb.177238: jeb177238. doi:10.1242/jeb.177238. PMID 29487158.
    47. ^ Eriksson ES (1985). "Attack behaviour and distance perception in the Australian bulldog ant Myrmecia nigriceps" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology. 119 (1): 115–131. Bibcode:1985JExpB.119..115E. doi:10.1242/jeb.119.1.115. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    48. ^ Yilmaz, Ayse; Spaethe, Johannes (2022). "Colour vision in ants (Formicidae, Hymenoptera)". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 377 (1862) 20210291. doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0291. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 9441231. PMID 36058251.
    49. ^ Eisner T, Happ GM (1962). "The infrabuccal pocket of a formicine ant: a social filtration device". Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 69 (3): 107–116. doi:10.1155/1962/25068.
    50. ^ Holbrook, Tate (22 September 2009). "Ask a Biologist: Face to Face with Ants". ASU School of Life Sciences. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
    51. ^ a b Gaul AT (1951). "A Glossary of Terms and Phrases Used in the Study of Social Insects". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 44 (3): 473–484. doi:10.1093/aesa/44.3.473. ISSN 1938-2901.
    52. ^ Wilson EO (June 1953). "The origin and evolution of polymorphism in ants". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 28 (2): 136–156. doi:10.1086/399512. PMID 13074471. S2CID 4560071.
    53. ^ Weber, NA (1946). "Dimorphism in the African Oecophylla worker and an anomaly (Hym.: Formicidae)" (PDF). Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 39: 7–10. doi:10.1093/aesa/39.1.7. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    54. ^ Wilson EO, Taylor RW (1964). "A Fossil Ant Colony: New Evidence of Social Antiquity" (PDF). Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 71 (2): 93–103. doi:10.1155/1964/17612. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    55. ^ Moffett MW, Tobin JE (1991). "Physical castes in ant workers: a problem for Daceton armigerum and other ants" (PDF). Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 98 (4): 283–292. doi:10.1155/1991/30265. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2008.
    56. ^ Børgesen LW (2000). "Nutritional function of replete workers in the pharaoh's ant, Monomorium pharaonis (L.)". Insectes Sociaux. 47 (2): 141–146. doi:10.1007/PL00001692. S2CID 31953751.
    57. ^ Rissing SW (1984). "Replete caste production and allometry of workers in the Honey Ant, Myrmecocystus mexicanus Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 57 (2): 347–350.
    58. ^ Hughes WO, Sumner S, Van Borm S, Boomsma JJ (August 2003). "Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (16): 9394–9397. Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.9394H. doi:10.1073/pnas.1633701100. PMC 170929. PMID 12878720.
    59. ^ Ross KG, Krieger MJ, Shoemaker DD (December 2003). "Alternative genetic foundations for a key social polymorphism in fire ants". Genetics. 165 (4): 1853–1867. doi:10.1093/genetics/165.4.1853. PMC 1462884. PMID 14704171.
    60. ^ Crosland MW, Crozier RH (March 1986). "Myrmecia pilosula, an ant with only one Pair of chromosomes". Science. 231 (4743): 1278. Bibcode:1986Sci...231.1278C. doi:10.1126/science.231.4743.1278. PMID 17839565. S2CID 25465053.
    61. ^ Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Spagna JC, Johnston JS (February 2008). "The evolution of genome size in ants". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 8 (64): 64. Bibcode:2008BMCEE...8...64T. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-64. PMC 2268675. PMID 18302783.
    62. ^ a b Moura, Mariana Neves; Cardoso, Danon Clemes; Cristiano, Maykon Passos (2021). "The tight genome size of ants: diversity and evolution under ancestral state reconstruction and base composition". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 193 (1): 124–144. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa135. ISSN 0024-4082.
    63. ^ Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990). The Ants. Harvard University Press. p. 291. ISBN 978-0-674-04075-5.
    64. ^ Gillott, Cedric (1995). Entomology. Springer. p. 325. ISBN 978-0-306-44967-3.
    65. ^ Anderson KE, Linksvayer TA, Smith CR (2008). "The causes and consequences of genetic caste determination in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Myrmecol. News. 11: 119–132.
    66. ^ Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), pp. 351, 372
    67. ^ Traniello JFA (1989). "Foraging strategies of ants". Annual Review of Entomology. 34: 191–210. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.001203.
    68. ^ Sorensen A, Busch TM, Vinson SB (1984). "Behavioral flexibility of temporal sub-castes in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, in response to food". Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 91 (3–4): 319–332. doi:10.1155/1984/39236.
    69. ^ Tofilski, Adam; Couvillon, Margaret J.; Evison, Sophie E. F.; Helanterä, Heikki; Robinson, Elva J. H.; Ratnieks, Francis L. W. (2008). "Preemptive Defensive Self-Sacrifice by Ant Workers". The American Naturalist. 172 (5): E239 – E243. Bibcode:2008ANat..172E.239T. doi:10.1086/591688. ISSN 0003-0147. PMID 18928332. S2CID 7052340.
    70. ^ Shorter, J. R.; Rueppell, O. (2012). "A review on self-destructive defense behaviors in social insects". Insectes Sociaux. 59 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1007/s00040-011-0210-x. ISSN 0020-1812. S2CID 253634662.
    71. ^ Keller L (1998). "Queen lifespan and colony characteristics in ants and termites". Insectes Sociaux. 45 (3): 235–246. doi:10.1007/s000400050084. S2CID 24541087.
    72. ^ a b Franks NR, Resh VH, Cardé RT, eds. (2003). Encyclopedia of Insects. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 29–32. ISBN 978-0-12-586990-4.
    73. ^ Kipyatkov VE (2001). "Seasonal life cycles and the forms of dormancy in ants (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea)". Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae. 65 (2): 198–217.
    74. ^ Heinze J, Tsuji K (1995). "Ant reproductive strategies" (PDF). Res. Popul. Ecol. 37 (2): 135–149. Bibcode:1995PopEc..37..135H. doi:10.1007/BF02515814. S2CID 21948488. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 May 2011. Retrieved 16 April 2009.
    75. ^ Mikheyev AS (2003). "Evidence for mating plugs in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta". Insectes Sociaux. 50 (4): 401–402. doi:10.1007/s00040-003-0697-x. S2CID 43492133.
    76. ^ Peeters C, Hölldobler B (November 1995). "Reproductive cooperation between queens and their mated workers: the complex life history of an ant with a valuable nest". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 92 (24): 10977–10979. Bibcode:1995PNAS...9210977P. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.24.10977. PMC 40553. PMID 11607589.
    77. ^ Leniaud, Laurianne; Darras, Hugo; Boulay, Raphael; Aron, Serge (2012). "Social Hybridogenesis in the Clonal Ant Cataglyphis hispanica". Current Biology. 22 (13): 1188–1193. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.060. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 22683263.
    78. ^ Eyer, P. A.; Leniaud, L.; Darras, H.; Aron, S. (2013). "Hybridogenesis through thelytokous parthenogenesis in two Cataglyphis desert ants". Molecular Ecology. 22 (4): 947–955. doi:10.1111/mec.12141. ISSN 0962-1083.
    79. ^ Kuhn, Alexandre; Darras, Hugo; Paknia, Omid; Aron, Serge (2020). "Repeated evolution of queen parthenogenesis and social hybridogenesis in Cataglyphis desert ants". Molecular Ecology. 29 (3): 549–564. doi:10.1111/mec.15283. ISSN 0962-1083.
    80. ^ Umphrey, Gary J. (2006). "Sperm parasitism in ants: selection for interspecific mating and hybridization". Ecology. 87 (9): 2148–2159. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2148:SPIASF]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0012-9658.
    81. ^ Juvé, Y.; Lutrat, C.; Ha, A.; Weyna, A.; Lauroua, E.; Afonso Silva, A. C.; Roux, C.; Schifani, E.; Galkowski, C.; Lebas, C.; Allio, R.; Stoyanov, I.; Galtier, N.; Schlick-Steiner, B. C.; Steiner, F. M. (2025). "One mother for two species via obligate cross-species cloning in ants". Nature. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09425-w. ISSN 0028-0836.
    82. ^ Franks NR, Hölldobler B (1987). "Sexual competition during colony reproduction in army ants". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 30 (3): 229–243. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb00298.x.
    83. ^ Yamauchi K, Kawase N (1992). "Pheromonal manipulation of workers by a fighting male to kill his rival males in the ant Cardiocondyla wroughtonii". Naturwissenschaften. 79 (6): 274–276. Bibcode:1992NW.....79..274Y. doi:10.1007/BF01175395. S2CID 31191187.
    84. ^ Taylor RW (2007). "Bloody funny wasps! Speculations on the evolution of eusociality in ants" (PDF). In Snelling RR, Fisher BL, Ward PS (eds.). Advances in ant systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): homage to E. O. Wilson – 50 years of contributions. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 80. American Entomological Institute. pp. 580–609. Retrieved 13 December 2015.
    85. ^ Wilson EO (1957). "The organization of a nuptial flight of the ant Pheidole sitarches Wheeler" (PDF). Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 64 (2): 46–50. doi:10.1155/1957/68319.
    86. ^ a b c Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), pp. 143–179
    87. ^ Heinze, Jürgen (2017). "Life-history evolution in ants: the case of Cardiocondyla". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 284 (1850) 20161406. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1406. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 5360909. PMID 28298341.
    88. ^ Vidal M, Königseder F, Giehr J, Schrempf A, Lucas C, Heinze J (May 2021). "Worker ants promote outbreeding by transporting young queens to alien nests". Communications Biology. 4 (1) 515. doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02016-1. PMC 8093424. PMID 33941829.
    89. ^ Foitzik, Susanne; Kureck, Ilka Maria; Rüger, Markus Hannes; Metzler, Dirk (1 October 2010). "Alternative reproductive tactics and the impact of local competition on sex ratios in the ant Hypoponera opacior". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 64 (10): 1641–1654. Bibcode:2010BEcoS..64.1641F. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0977-1. ISSN 1432-0762.
    90. ^ Foitzik, S.; Fröba, J.; Rüger, M. H.; Witte, V. (1 May 2011). "Competition over workers: fertility signalling in wingless queens of Hypoponera opacior". Insectes Sociaux. 58 (2): 271–278. doi:10.1007/s00040-011-0147-0. ISSN 1420-9098.
    91. ^ Foitzik, Susanne; Heinze, Jürgen; Oberstadt, Björn; Herbers, Joan M. (1 March 2002). "Mate guarding and alternative reproductive tactics in the ant Hypoponera opacior". Animal Behaviour. 63 (3): 597–604. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1945. ISSN 0003-3472.
    92. ^ Sudd JH, Franks NR (2013). The Behavioural Ecology of Ants. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 41. ISBN 978-94-009-3123-7.
    93. ^ Cook, Zoe; Franks, Daniel W.; Robinson, Elva J.H. (2013). "Exploration versus exploitation in polydomous ant colonies". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 323: 49–56. Bibcode:2013JThBi.323...49C. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.022. PMID 23380232.
    94. ^ Bos, Nick; d'Ettorre, Patrizia (2012). "Recognition of Social Identity in Ants". Frontiers in Psychology. 3: 83. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00083. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 3309994. PMID 22461777.
    95. ^ Moffett, Mark W. (2012). "Supercolonies of billions in an invasive ant: What is a society?". Behavioral Ecology. 23 (5): 925–933. doi:10.1093/beheco/ars043. ISSN 1465-7279.
    96. ^ Van Wilgenburg, Ellen; Torres, Candice W.; Tsutsui, Neil D. (2010). "The global expansion of a single ant supercolony". Evolutionary Applications. 3 (2): 136–143. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00114.x. ISSN 1752-4571. PMC 3352483. PMID 25567914.
    97. ^ Heikki Helanterä (2022). "Supercolonies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): ecological patterns, behavioural processes and their implications for social evolution". Myrmecological News. 32: 1–22. doi:10.25849/MYRMECOL.NEWS_032:001.
    98. ^ Helanterä, Heikki; Strassmann, Joan E.; Carrillo, Juli; Queller, David C. (2009). "Unicolonial ants: where do they come from, what are they and where are they going?". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 24 (6): 341–349. Bibcode:2009TEcoE..24..341H. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.013. PMID 19328589.
    99. ^ a b Jackson DE, Ratnieks FL (August 2006). "Communication in ants". Current Biology. 16 (15): R570 – R574. Bibcode:2006CBio...16.R570J. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.015. PMID 16890508. S2CID 5835320.
    100. ^ Goss S, Aron S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1989). "Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant" (PDF). Naturwissenschaften. 76 (12): 579–581. Bibcode:1989NW.....76..579G. doi:10.1007/BF00462870. S2CID 18506807. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    101. ^ D'Ettorre P, Heinze J (2001). "Sociobiology of slave-making ants". Acta Ethologica. 3 (2): 67–82. doi:10.1007/s102110100038. S2CID 37840769.
    102. ^ Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1999). Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser. pp. 224–227. ISBN 978-3-7643-5792-4.
    103. ^ Greene MJ, Gordon DM (March 2007). "Structural complexity of chemical recognition cues affects the perception of group membership in the ants Linephithema humile and Aphaenogaster cockerelli". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 210 (Pt 5): 897–905. Bibcode:2007JExpB.210..897G. doi:10.1242/jeb.02706. PMID 17297148. S2CID 14909476.
    104. ^ Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), p. 354
    105. ^ Hickling R, Brown RL (October 2000). "Analysis of acoustic communication by ants". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 108 (4): 1920–1929. Bibcode:2000ASAJ..108.1920H. doi:10.1121/1.1290515. PMID 11051518.
    106. ^ Roces F, Hölldobler B (1996). "Use of stridulation in foraging leaf-cutting ants: Mechanical support during cutting or short-range recruitment signal?". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 39 (5): 293–299. Bibcode:1996BEcoS..39..293R. doi:10.1007/s002650050292. S2CID 32884747.
    107. ^ Schmidt JO, Blum MS, Overal WL (1983). "Hemolytic activities of stinging insect venoms". Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 1 (2): 155–160. doi:10.1002/arch.940010205.
    108. ^ Clarke PS (1986). "The natural history of sensitivity to jack jumper ants (Hymenoptera formicidae Myrmecia pilosula) in Tasmania". The Medical Journal of Australia. 145 (11–12): 564–566. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb139498.x. PMID 3796365.
    109. ^ Brown SG, Heddle RJ, Wiese MD, Blackman KE (August 2005). "Efficacy of ant venom immunotherapy and whole body extracts". The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 116 (2): 464–465, author reply 465–466. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.04.025. PMID 16083810.
    110. ^ Obin MS, Vander Meer RK (December 1985). "Gaster flagging by fire ants (Solenopsis spp.): Functional significance of venom dispersal behavior". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 11 (12): 1757–1768. Bibcode:1985JCEco..11.1757O. doi:10.1007/BF01012125. PMID 24311339. S2CID 12182722.
    111. ^ Stafford CT (August 1996). "Hypersensitivity to fire ant venom". Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. 77 (2): 87–95, quiz 96–99. doi:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63493-X. PMID 8760773.
    112. ^ Lopez LC, Morgan ED, Brand JM (1993). "Hexadecanol and hexadecyl formate in the venom gland of formicine ants". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 341 (1296): 177–180. doi:10.1098/rstb.1993.0101. S2CID 85361145.
    113. ^ a b c Patek SN, Baio JE, Fisher BL, Suarez AV (August 2006). "Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (34): 12787–12792. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10312787P. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604290103. PMC 1568925. PMID 16924120.
    114. ^ Gronenberg W (1996). "The trap-jaw mechanism in the dacetine ants Daceton armigerum and Strumigenys sp" (PDF). The Journal of Experimental Biology. 199 (Pt 9): 2021–2033. Bibcode:1996JExpB.199.2021G. doi:10.1242/jeb.199.9.2021. PMID 9319931. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    115. ^ Jones TH, Clark DA, Edwards AA, Davidson DW, Spande TF, Snelling RR (August 2004). "The chemistry of exploding ants, Camponotus spp. (cylindricus complex)". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 30 (8): 1479–1492. Bibcode:2004JCEco..30.1479J. doi:10.1023/B:JOEC.0000042063.01424.28. PMID 15537154. S2CID 23756265.
    116. ^ a b Yek, Sze Huei; Mueller, Ulrich G. (2011). "The metapleural gland of ants" (PDF). Biological Reviews. 86 (4): 774–791. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00170.x. PMID 21504532. S2CID 7690884.
    117. ^ Julian GE, Cahan S (August 1999). "Undertaking specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor". Animal Behaviour. 58 (2): 437–442. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1184. PMID 10458895. S2CID 23845331.
    118. ^ López-Riquelme GO, Malo EA, Cruz-López L, Fanjul-Moles ML (2006). "Antennal olfactory sensitivity in response to task-related odours of three castes of the ant Atta mexicana (hymenoptera: formicidae)". Physiological Entomology. 31 (4): 353–360. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.2006.00526.x. S2CID 84890901.
    119. ^ Choe DH, Millar JG, Rust MK (May 2009). "Chemical signals associated with life inhibit necrophoresis in Argentine ants". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (20): 8251–8255. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.8251C. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901270106. PMC 2688878. PMID 19416815.
    120. ^ Frank, Erik. T.; Kesner, Lucie; Liberti, Joanito; Helleu, Quentin; LeBoeuf, Adria C.; Dascalu, Andrei; Sponsler, Douglas B.; Azuma, Fumika; Economo, Evan P.; Waridel, Patrice; Engel, Philipp; Schmitt, Thomas; Keller, Laurent (29 December 2023). "Targeted treatment of injured nestmates with antimicrobial compounds in an ant society". Nature Communications. 14 (1): 8446. Bibcode:2023NatCo..14.8446F. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43885-w. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 10756881. PMID 38158416.
    121. ^ Frank, Erik.T.; Buffat, Dany; Liberti, Joanito; Aibekova, Lazzat; Economo, Evan P.; Keller, Laurent (2024). "Wound-dependent leg amputations to combat infections in an ant society". Current Biology. 34 (14): 3273–3278.e3. Bibcode:2024CBio...34.3273F. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.06.021. PMID 38959879.
    122. ^ Tschinkel WR (2004). "The nest architecture of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius". Journal of Insect Science. 4 (21): 21. doi:10.1093/jis/4.1.21. PMC 528881. PMID 15861237.
    123. ^ Peeters C, Hölldobler B, Moffett M, Musthak Ali TM (1994). ""Wall-papering" and elaborate nest architecture in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos saltator". Insectes Sociaux. 41 (2): 211–218. doi:10.1007/BF01240479. S2CID 41870857.
    124. ^ Maschwitz U, Moog J (December 2000). "Communal peeing: a new mode of flood control in ants". Die Naturwissenschaften. 87 (12): 563–565. Bibcode:2000NW.....87..563M. doi:10.1007/s001140050780. PMID 11198200. S2CID 7482935.
    125. ^ Nielsen MG, Christian KA (May 2007). "The mangrove ant, Camponotus anderseni, switches to anaerobic respiration in response to elevated CO2 levels". Journal of Insect Physiology. 53 (5): 505–508. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.02.002. PMID 17382956.
    126. ^ Franks NR, Richardson T (January 2006). "Teaching in tandem-running ants". Nature. 439 (7073): 153. Bibcode:2006Natur.439..153F. doi:10.1038/439153a. PMID 16407943. S2CID 4416276.
    127. ^ Ravary F, Lecoutey E, Kaminski G, Châline N, Jaisson P (August 2007). "Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants". Current Biology. 17 (15): 1308–1312. Bibcode:2007CBio...17.1308R. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.047. PMID 17629482. S2CID 13273984.
    128. ^ Franks NR, Hooper J, Webb C, Dornhaus A (June 2005). "Tomb evaders: house-hunting hygiene in ants". Biology Letters. 1 (2): 190–192. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0302. PMC 1626204. PMID 17148163.
    129. ^ Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), p. 573
    130. ^ Robson SK, Kohout RJ (2005). "Evolution of nest-weaving behaviour in arboreal nesting ants of the genus Polyrhachis Fr. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Australian Journal of Entomology. 44 (2): 164–169. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.2005.00462.x.
    131. ^ Frouz J (2000). "The Effect of Nest Moisture on Daily Temperature Regime in the Nests of Formica polyctena Wood Ants". Insectes Sociaux. 47 (3): 229–235. doi:10.1007/PL00001708. S2CID 955282.
    132. ^ Kadochová, Štěpánka; Frouz, Jan (2013). "Thermoregulation strategies in ants in comparison to other social insects, with a focus on red wood ants ( Formica rufa group)". F1000Research. 2: 280. doi:10.12688/f1000research.2-280.v2. ISSN 2046-1402. PMC 3962001. PMID 24715967.
    133. ^ Carpintero S, Reyes-López J, de Reynac LA (2004). "Impact of human dwellings on the distribution of the exotic Argentine ant: a case study in the Doñana National Park, Spain". Biological Conservation. 115 (2): 279–289. Bibcode:2004BCons.115..279C. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00147-2.
    134. ^ Friedrich R, Philpott SM (June 2009). "Nest-site limitation and nesting resources of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in urban green spaces". Environmental Entomology. 38 (3): 600–607. doi:10.1603/022.038.0311. PMID 19508768. S2CID 20555077.
    135. ^ Anderson KE, Russell JA, Moreau CS, Kautz S, Sullam KE, Hu Y, Basinger U, Mott BM, Buck N, Wheeler DE (May 2012). "Highly similar microbial communities are shared among related and trophically similar ant species". Molecular Ecology. 21 (9): 2282–2296. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.2282A. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05464.x. PMID 22276952. S2CID 32534515.
    136. ^ Feldhaar H, Straka J, Krischke M, Berthold K, Stoll S, Mueller MJ, Gross R (October 2007). "Nutritional upgrading for omnivorous carpenter ants by the endosymbiont Blochmannia". BMC Biology. 5 48. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-48. PMC 2206011. PMID 17971224.
    137. ^ Russell JA, Moreau CS, Goldman-Huertas B, Fujiwara M, Lohman DJ, Pierce NE (December 2009). "Bacterial gut symbionts are tightly linked with the evolution of herbivory in ants". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (50): 21236–21241. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10621236R. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907926106. PMC 2785723. PMID 19948964.
    138. ^ Schultz TR (1999). "Ants, plants and antibiotics" (PDF). Nature. 398 (6730): 747–748. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..747S. doi:10.1038/19619. S2CID 5167611. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    139. ^ a b c Carrol CR, Janzen DH (1973). "Ecology of foraging by ants". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 4 (1): 231–257. Bibcode:1973AnRES...4..231C. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.001311.
    140. ^ Wittlinger M, Wehner R, Wolf H (June 2006). "The ant odometer: stepping on stilts and stumps" (PDF). Science. 312 (5782): 1965–1967. Bibcode:2006Sci...312.1965W. doi:10.1126/science.1126912. PMID 16809544. S2CID 15162376. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 July 2011.
    141. ^ Ronacher B, Werner R (1995). "Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis use self-induced optic flow to measure distances travelled" (PDF). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 177. doi:10.1007/BF00243395. S2CID 4625001. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 7 June 2011.
    142. ^ Wehner R (August 2003). "Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks" (PDF). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 189 (8): 579–588. doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0431-1. PMID 12879352. S2CID 4571290. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 July 2011. Retrieved 7 September 2010.
    143. ^ Sommer S, Wehner R (January 2004). "The ant's estimation of distance travelled: experiments with desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis" (PDF). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 190 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0465-4. PMID 14614570. S2CID 23280914.
    144. ^ Åkesson S, Wehner R (2002). "Visual navigation in desert ants Cataglyphis fortis: are snapshots coupled to a celestial system of reference?" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology. 205 (14): 1971–1978. Bibcode:2002JExpB.205.1971A. doi:10.1242/jeb.205.14.1971. PMID 12089203.
    145. ^ Steck K, Hansson BS, Knaden M (February 2009). "Smells like home: Desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, use olfactory landmarks to pinpoint the nest". Frontiers in Zoology. 6 5. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-5. PMC 2651142. PMID 19250516.
    146. ^ Seidl T, Wehner R (September 2006). "Visual and tactile learning of ground structures in desert ants". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 209 (Pt 17): 3336–3344. Bibcode:2006JExpB.209.3336S. doi:10.1242/jeb.02364. PMID 16916970. S2CID 9642888.
    147. ^ Banks AN, Srygley RB (2003). "Orientation by magnetic field in leaf-cutter ants, Atta colombica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Ethology. 109 (10): 835–846. Bibcode:2003Ethol.109..835B. doi:10.1046/j.0179-1613.2003.00927.x.
    148. ^ Fukushi T (June 2001). "Homing in wood ants, Formica japonica: use of the skyline panorama". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 204 (Pt 12): 2063–2072. Bibcode:2001JExpB.204.2063F. doi:10.1242/jeb.204.12.2063. PMID 11441048.
    149. ^ Wehner R, Menzel R (April 1969). "Homing in the ant Cataglyphis bicolor". Science. 164 (3876): 192–194. Bibcode:1969Sci...164..192W. doi:10.1126/science.164.3876.192. PMID 5774195. S2CID 41669795.
    150. ^ Chapman RF (1998). The Insects: Structure and Function (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 600. ISBN 978-0-521-57890-5.
    151. ^ Delsuc F (November 2003). "Army ants trapped by their evolutionary history". PLOS Biology. 1 (2) E37. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000037. PMC 261877. PMID 14624241.
    152. ^ Baroni-Urbani C, Boyan GS, Blarer A, Billen J, Musthak Ali TM (1994). "A novel mechanism for jumping in the Indian ant Harpegnathos saltator (Jerdon) (Formicidae, Ponerinae)". Experientia. 50: 63–71. doi:10.1007/BF01992052. S2CID 42304237.
    153. ^ Yanoviak SP, Dudley R, Kaspari M (February 2005). "Directed aerial descent in canopy ants" (PDF). Nature. 433 (7026): 624–626. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..624Y. doi:10.1038/nature03254. PMID 15703745. S2CID 4368995. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2007.
    154. ^ Mlot NJ, Tovey CA, Hu DL (May 2011). "Fire ants self-assemble into waterproof rafts to survive floods". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (19): 7669–7673. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.7669M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1016658108. PMC 3093451. PMID 21518911.
    155. ^ Morrison LW (1998). "A review of Bahamian ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) biogeography". Journal of Biogeography. 25 (3): 561–571. Bibcode:1998JBiog..25..561M. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2530561.x. S2CID 84923599.
    156. ^ Clay RE, Andersen AN (1996). "Ant fauna of a mangrove community in the Australian seasonal tropics, with particular reference to zonation". Australian Journal of Zoology. 44 (5): 521–533. doi:10.1071/ZO9960521.
    157. ^ Crosland MW, Crozier RH, Jefferson E (1988). "Aspects of the biology of the primitive ant genus Myrmecia F. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Australian Journal of Entomology. 27 (4): 305–309. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.1988.tb01179.x.
    158. ^ Diehl E, Junqueira LK, Berti-Filho E (August 2005). "Ant and termite mound coinhabitants in the wetlands of Santo Antonio da Patrulha, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil". Brazilian Journal of Biology. 65 (3): 431–437. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842005000300008. PMID 16341421.
    159. ^ Achenbach A, Foitzik S (April 2009). "First evidence for slave rebellion: enslaved ant workers systematically kill the brood of their social parasite protomognathus americanus". Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 63 (4): 1068–1075. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00591.x. PMID 19243573. S2CID 9546342. See also New Scientist, 9 April 2009
    160. ^ Henderson G, Andersen JF, Phillips JK, Jeanne RL (July 1990). "Internest aggression and identification of possible nestmate discrimination pheromones in polygynous antFormica montana". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 16 (7): 2217–2228. Bibcode:1990JCEco..16.2217H. doi:10.1007/BF01026932. PMID 24264088. S2CID 22878651.
    161. ^ Ward PS (1996). "A new workerless social parasite in the ant genus Pseudomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a discussion of the origin of social parasitism in ants". Systematic Entomology. 21 (3): 253–263. Bibcode:1996SysEn..21..253W. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3113.1996.d01-12.x. S2CID 84198690.
    162. ^ Taylor RW (1968). "The Australian workerless inquiline ant, Strumigenys xenos Brown (Hymenoptera-Formicidae) recorded from New Zealand". New Zealand Entomologist. 4 (1): 47–49. Bibcode:1968NZEnt...4...47T. doi:10.1080/00779962.1968.9722888. S2CID 83791596.
    163. ^ Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), pp. 436–448
    164. ^ Fournier D, Estoup A, Orivel J, Foucaud J, Jourdan H, Le Breton J, Keller L (June 2005). "Clonal reproduction by males and females in the little fire ant" (PDF). Nature. 435 (7046): 1230–1234. Bibcode:2005Natur.435.1230F. doi:10.1038/nature03705. PMID 15988525. S2CID 1188960.
    165. ^ Reiskind J (1977). "Ant-mimicry in Panamanian clubionid and salticid spiders (Araneae: Clubionidae, Salticidae)". Biotropica. 9 (1): 1–8. Bibcode:1977Biotr...9....1R. doi:10.2307/2387854. JSTOR 2387854.
    166. ^ Cushing PE (1997). "Myrmecomorphy and myrmecophily in spiders: A Review" (PDF). The Florida Entomologist. 80 (2): 165–193. doi:10.2307/3495552. JSTOR 3495552. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    167. ^ Styrsky JD, Eubanks MD (January 2007). "Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274 (1607): 151–164. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3701. PMC 1685857. PMID 17148245.
    168. ^ Jahn GC, Beardsley JW (1996). "Effects of Pheidole megacephala (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on survival and dispersal of Dysmicoccus neobrevipes (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae)". Journal of Economic Entomology. 89 (5): 1124–1129. doi:10.1093/jee/89.5.1124.
    169. ^ Hojo, Masaru K.; Pierce, Naomi E.; Tsuji, Kazuki (2015). "Lycaenid Caterpillar secretions manipulate attendant ant behavior". Current Biology. 25 (17): 2260–2264. Bibcode:2015CBio...25.2260H. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.016. PMID 26234210.
    170. ^ DeVries PJ (1992). "Singing caterpillars, ants and symbiosis". Scientific American. 267 (4): 76–82. Bibcode:1992SciAm.267d..76D. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1092-76.
    171. ^ Elfferich NW (1998). "Is the larval and imaginal signalling of Lycaenidae and other Lepidoptera related to communication with ants". Deinsea. 4 (1).
    172. ^ Pierce NE, Braby MF, Heath A, Lohman DJ, Mathew J, Rand DB, Travassos MA (2002). "The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera)". Annual Review of Entomology. 47: 733–771. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145257. PMID 11729090.
    173. ^ Kautz S, Rubin BE, Russell JA, Moreau CS (January 2013). "Surveying the microbiome of ants: comparing 454 pyrosequencing with traditional methods to uncover bacterial diversity". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 79 (2): 525–534. Bibcode:2013ApEnM..79..525K. doi:10.1128/AEM.03107-12. PMC 3553759. PMID 23124239.
    174. ^ Neuvonen MM, Tamarit D, Näslund K, Liebig J, Feldhaar H, Moran NA, Guy L, Andersson SG (December 2016). "The genome of Rhizobiales bacteria in predatory ants reveals urease gene functions but no genes for nitrogen fixation". Scientific Reports. 6 (1) 39197. Bibcode:2016NatSR...639197N. doi:10.1038/srep39197. PMC 5156944. PMID 27976703.
    175. ^ Dejean A, Solano PJ, Ayroles J, Corbara B, Orivel J (April 2005). "Insect behaviour: arboreal ants build traps to capture prey". Nature. 434 (7036): 973. Bibcode:2005Natur.434..973D. doi:10.1038/434973a. PMID 15846335. S2CID 4428574.
    176. ^ Frederickson ME, Gordon DM (April 2007). "The devil to pay: a cost of mutualism with Myrmelachista schumanni ants in 'devil's gardens' is increased herbivory on Duroia hirsuta trees". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274 (1613): 1117–23. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0415. PMC 2124481. PMID 17301016.
    177. ^ Peakall R, Beattie AJ, James SH (October 1987). "Pseudocopulation of an orchid by male ants: a test of two hypotheses accounting for the rarity of ant pollination". Oecologia. 73 (4): 522–524. Bibcode:1987Oecol..73..522P. doi:10.1007/BF00379410. PMID 28311968. S2CID 3195610.
    178. ^ Beattie AJ, Turnbull C, R B K, E G W (1984). "Ant Inhibition of Pollen Function: A Possible Reason Why Ant Pollination is Rare". American Journal of Botany. 71 (3): 421–426. doi:10.2307/2443499. JSTOR 2443499.
    179. ^ New, Tim R. (2017). "Classic Themes: Ants, Plants and Fungi". Mutualisms and Insect Conservation. Springer International Publishing. pp. 63–103. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58292-4_4. ISBN 978-3-319-58291-7.
    180. ^ Suissa, Jacob S.; Li, Fay-Wei; Moreau, Corrie S. (2024). "Convergent evolution of fern nectaries facilitated independent recruitment of ant-bodyguards from flowering plants". Nature Communications. 15 (1): 4392. Bibcode:2024NatCo..15.4392S. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48646-x. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 11126701. PMID 38789437.
    181. ^ Katayama N, Suzuki N (2004). "Role of extrafloral nectaries of Vicia faba in attraction of ants and herbivore exclusion by ants". Entomological Science. 7 (2): 119–124. doi:10.1111/j.1479-8298.2004.00057.x. hdl:10252/00005880. S2CID 85428729.
    182. ^ Fischer RC, Wanek W, Richter A, Mayer V (2003). "Do ants feed plants? A 15N labelling study of nitrogen fluxes from ants to plants in the mutualism of Pheidole and Piper". Journal of Ecology. 91 (1): 126–134. Bibcode:2003JEcol..91..126F. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00747.x.
    183. ^ Chomicki G, Renner SS (November 2016). "Obligate plant farming by a specialized ant". Nature Plants. 2 (12) 16181. Bibcode:2016NatPl...216181C. doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.181. PMID 27869787. S2CID 23748032.
    184. ^ Chomicki G, Janda M, Renner SS (March 2017). "The assembly of ant-farmed gardens: mutualism specialization following host broadening". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 284 (1850) 20161759. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1759. PMC 5360912. PMID 28298344.
    185. ^ Fiala B, Maschwitz U, Pong TY, Helbig AJ (June 1989). "Studies of a South East Asian ant-plant association: protection of Macaranga trees by Crematogaster borneensis" (PDF). Oecologia. 79 (4): 463–470. Bibcode:1989Oecol..79..463F. doi:10.1007/bf00378662. PMID 28313479. S2CID 21112371.[dead link]
    186. ^ a b Lengyel S, Gove AD, Latimer AM, Majer JD, Dunn RR (2010). "Convergent evolution of seed dispersal by ants, and phylogeny and biogeography in flowering plants: A global survey". Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 12 (1): 43–55. Bibcode:2010PPEES..12...43L. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2009.08.001.
    187. ^ Giladi I (2006). "Choosing benefits or partners: a review of the evidence for the evolution of myrmecochory". Oikos. 112 (3): 481–492. Bibcode:2006Oikos.112..481G. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.530.1306. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14258.x.
    188. ^ Hanzawa FM, Beattie AJ, Culver DC (1988). "Directed dispersal: demographic analysis of an ant-seed mutualism". American Naturalist. 131 (1): 1–13. Bibcode:1988ANat..131....1H. doi:10.1086/284769. S2CID 85317649.
    189. ^ Auld TD (1996). "Ecology of the Fabaceae in the Sydney region: fire, ants and the soil seedbank". Cunninghamia. 4 (22).
    190. ^ Fischer RC, Ölzant SM, Wanek W, Mayer V (2005). "The fate of Corydalis cava elaiosomes within an ant colony of Myrmica rubra: elaiosomes are preferentially fed to larvae". Insectes Sociaux. 52 (1): 55–62. doi:10.1007/s00040-004-0773-x. S2CID 21974767.
    191. ^ Frouz, Jan (1997). "The effect of wood ants (Formica polyctena Foerst) on the transformation of phosphorus in a spruce plantation". Pedobiologia. 41 (5): 437–447. Bibcode:1997Pedob..41..437F. doi:10.1016/S0031-4056(24)00314-7.
    192. ^ Frouz, J; Jílková, V (2008). "The effect of ants on soil properties and processes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Myrmecological News. 1: 191–199.
    193. ^ Frouz, Jan; Jílková, Veronika; Sorvari, Jouni (2016). "Contribution of wood ants to nutrient cycling and ecosystem function". In Robinson, Elva J. H.; Stockan, Jenni A. (eds.). Wood Ant Ecology and Conservation. Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 207–220. ISBN 978-1-107-04833-1. Retrieved 12 July 2021.
    194. ^ Hughes L, Westoby M (1992). "Capitula on stick insect eggs and elaiosomes on seeds: convergent adaptations for burial by ants". Functional Ecology. 6 (6): 642–648. Bibcode:1992FuEco...6..642.. doi:10.2307/2389958. JSTOR 2389958.
    195. ^ Quinet Y, Tekule N, de Biseau JC (2005). "Behavioural Interactions Between Crematogaster brevispinosa rochai Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Two Nasutitermes Species (Isoptera: Termitidae)". Journal of Insect Behavior. 18 (1): 1–17. Bibcode:2005JIBeh..18....1Q. doi:10.1007/s10905-005-9343-y. S2CID 33487814.
    196. ^ Jeanne RL (1972). "Social biology of the neotropical wasp Mischocyttarus drewseni". Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 144: 63–150.
    197. ^ Jeanne R (July 1995). "Foraging in Social Wasps: Agelaia lacks recruitment to food (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society.
    198. ^ a b Sivinski J, Marshall S, Petersson E (1999). "Kleptoparasitism and phoresy in the Diptera" (PDF). Florida Entomologist. 82 (2): 179–197. doi:10.2307/3496570. JSTOR 3496570. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
    199. ^ Schaechter E (2000). "Some weird and wonderful fungi". Microbiology Today. 27 (3): 116–117.
    200. ^ Andersen SB, Gerritsma S, Yusah KM, Mayntz D, Hywel-Jones NL, Billen J, Boomsma JJ, Hughes DP (September 2009). "The life of a dead ant: the expression of an adaptive extended phenotype" (PDF). The American Naturalist. 174 (3): 424–433. Bibcode:2009ANat..174..424A. doi:10.1086/603640. hdl:11370/e6374602-b2a0-496c-b78e-774b34fb152b. PMID 19627240. S2CID 31283817.
    201. ^ Wojcik DP (1989). "Behavioral interactions between ants and their parasites". The Florida Entomologist. 72 (1): 43–451. doi:10.2307/3494966. JSTOR 3494966. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 25 October 2017.
    202. ^ Poinar G, Yanoviak SP (2008). "Myrmeconema neotropicum n. g., n. sp., a new tetradonematid nematode parasitising South American populations of Cephalotes atratus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with the discovery of an apparent parasite-induced host morph". Systematic Parasitology. 69 (2): 145–153. doi:10.1007/s11230-007-9125-3. PMID 18038201. S2CID 8473071.
    203. ^ Stoldt M, Klein L, Beros S, Butter F, Jongepier E, Feldmeyer B, Foitzik S (January 2021). "Parasite Presence Induces Gene Expression Changes in an Ant Host Related to Immunity and Longevity". Royal Society Open Science. 12 (1) 202118. doi:10.1098/rsos.202118. PMC 8131941. PMID 34017599.
    204. ^ McGugan, Jenna R.; Byrd, Gary D.; Roland, Alexandre B.; Caty, Stephanie N.; Kabir, Nisha; Tapia, Elicio E.; Trauger, Sunia A.; Coloma, Luis A.; O'Connell, Lauren A. (2016). "Ant and Mite Diversity Drives Toxin Variation in the Little Devil Poison Frog". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 42 (6): 537–551. Bibcode:2016JCEco..42..537M. doi:10.1007/s10886-016-0715-x. ISSN 0098-0331. PMID 27318689.
    205. ^ Caldwell JP (1996). "The evolution of myrmecophagy and its correlates in poison frogs (Family Dendrobatidae)". Journal of Zoology. 240 (1): 75–101. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05487.x.
    206. ^ Saporito, Ralph A.; Garraffo, H. Martin; Donnelly, Maureen A.; Edwards, Adam L.; Longino, John T.; Daly, John W. (2004). "Formicine ants: An arthropod source for the pumiliotoxin alkaloids of dendrobatid poison frogs". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (21): 8045–8050. doi:10.1073/pnas.0402365101. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 419554. PMID 15128938.
    207. ^ Rödel, Mark-Oliver; Brede, Christian; Hirschfeld, Mareike; Schmitt, Thomas; Favreau, Philippe; Stöcklin, Reto; Wunder, Cora; Mebs, Dietrich (2013). "Chemical Camouflage– A Frog's Strategy to Co-Exist with Aggressive Ants". PLOS ONE. 8 (12) e81950. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...881950R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081950. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3859521. PMID 24349157.
    208. ^ Willis E, Oniki Y (1978). "Birds and Army Ants". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 9 (1): 243–263. Bibcode:1978AnRES...9..243W. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.001331.
    209. ^ Vellely AC (2001). "Foraging at army ant swarms by fifty bird species in the highlands of Costa Rica" (PDF). Ornitologia Neotropical. 12: 271–275. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2008.
    210. ^ Inzunza ER, Martínez-Leyva JE, Valenzuela-González JE (2015). "Doves kleptoparasitize ants". The Southwestern Naturalist. 60 (1): 103–106. Bibcode:2015SWNat..60..103I. doi:10.1894/msh-03.1. S2CID 85633598.
    211. ^ Wrege PH, Wikelski M, Mandel JT, Rassweiler T, Couzin ID (2005). "Antbirds parasitize foraging army ants". Ecology. 86 (3): 555–559. Bibcode:2005Ecol...86..555W. doi:10.1890/04-1133.
    212. ^ Swenson JE, Jansson A, Riig R, Sandegren R (1999). "Bears and ants: myrmecophagy by brown bears in central Scandinavia". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 77 (4): 551–561. Bibcode:1999CaJZ...77..551S. doi:10.1139/z99-004.
    213. ^ Viles, Heather A.; Goudie, Andrew S.; Goudie, Alice M. (2021). "Ants as geomorphological agents: A global assessment". Earth-Science Reviews. 213 103469. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103469.
    214. ^ Hölldobler & Wilson (1990), pp. 619–629
    215. ^ Gottrup F, Leaper D (2004). "Wound healing: Historical aspects" (PDF). EWMA Journal. 4 (2): 5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2007.
    216. ^ Gudger EW (1925). "Stitching wounds with the mandibles of ants and beetles". Journal of the American Medical Association. 84 (24): 1861–1864. doi:10.1001/jama.1925.02660500069048.
    217. ^ Sapolsky RM (2001). A Primate's Memoir: A Neuroscientist's Unconventional Life Among the Baboons. Simon and Schuster. pp. 156. ISBN 978-0-7432-0241-1.
    218. ^ Wheeler WM (1910). Ants: Their Structure, Development and Behavior . Columbia University Biological Series. Vol. 9. Columbia University Press. p. 10. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.1937. ISBN 978-0-231-00121-2. LCCN 10008253. OCLC 560205. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
    219. ^ Haddad Junior V, Cardoso JL, Moraes RH (2005). "Description of an injury in a human caused by a false tocandira (Dinoponera gigantea, Perty, 1833) with a revision on folkloric, pharmacological and clinical aspects of the giant ants of the genera Paraponera and Dinoponera (sub-family Ponerinae)". Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. 47 (4): 235–238. doi:10.1590/S0036-46652005000400012. hdl:11449/30504. PMID 16138209.
    220. ^ McGain F, Winkel KD (August 2002). "Ant sting mortality in Australia". Toxicon. 40 (8): 1095–1100. Bibcode:2002Txcn...40.1095M. doi:10.1016/S0041-0101(02)00097-1. PMID 12165310.
    221. ^ Downes D, Laird SA (1999). "Innovative mechanisms for sharing benefits of biodiversity and related knowledge" (PDF). The Center for International Environmental Law. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 April 2008. Retrieved 8 June 2008.
    222. ^ Cheney RH, Scholtz E (1963). "Rooibos tea, a South African contribution to world beverages". Economic Botany. 17 (3): 186–194. Bibcode:1963EcBot..17..186C. doi:10.1007/BF02859435. S2CID 37728834.
    223. ^ Chapman RE, Bourke AF (2001). "The influence of sociality on the conservation biology of social insects". Ecology Letters. 4 (6): 650–662. Bibcode:2001EcolL...4..650C. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00253.x. S2CID 86796899.
    224. ^ Cruz-Labana, J. D.; Tarango-Arámbula, L. A.; Alcántara-Carbajal, J. L.; Pimentel-López, J.; Ugalde-Lezama, S.; Ramírez-Valverde, G.; Méndez-Gallegos, S. J. (2014). "Habitat use by the "Escamolera" ant (Liometopum apiculatum Mayr) in central Mexico". Agrociencia. 48 (6): 569–582. ISSN 1405-3195.
    225. ^ DeFoliart GR (1999). "Insects as food: why the western attitude is important". Annual Review of Entomology. 44: 21–50. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.21. PMID 9990715.
    226. ^ Bingham, C.T. (1903). Fauna of British India. Hymenoptera. Volume 2. London: Taylor and Francis. p. 311.
    227. ^ a b Bequaert J (1921). "Insects as food: How they have augmented the food supply of mankind in early and recent times". Natural History Journal. 21: 191–200.
    228. ^ Mutlu Sirakova, Sevgi (2023). "Forgotten Stories of Yogurt: Cultivating Multispecies Wisdom". Journal of Ethnobiology. 43 (3): 250–261. doi:10.1177/02780771231194779. ISSN 0278-0771.
    229. ^ a b "Pest Notes: Ants (Publication 7411)". University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2007. Retrieved 5 June 2008.
    230. ^ Lubbock J (1881). "Observations on ants, bees, and wasps. IX. Color of flowers as an attraction to bees: Experiments and considerations thereon". J. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Zool.). 16 (90): 110–112. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1882.tb02275.x.
    231. ^ Stadler B, Dixon AF (2008). Mutualism: Ants and their insect partners. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86035-2.
    232. ^ Kennedy CH (1951). "Myrmecological technique. IV. Collecting ants by rearing pupae". The Ohio Journal of Science. 51 (1): 17–20. hdl:1811/3802.
    233. ^ Wojcik DP, Burges RJ, Blanton CM, Focks DA (2000). "An improved and quantified technique for marking individual fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". The Florida Entomologist. 83 (1): 74–78. doi:10.2307/3496231. JSTOR 3496231.
    234. ^ Dicke, Elizabeth; Byde, Andrew; Cliff, Dave; Layzell, Paul (2004). "An Ant Inspired Technique for Storage Area Network Design". Biologically Inspired Approaches to Advanced Information Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 3141. pp. 364–379. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27835-1_27. ISBN 978-3-540-23339-8.
    235. ^ US granted 5803014, Guri A, "Habitat media for ants and other invertebrates", issued 8 September 1998, assigned to Plant Cell Technology Inc 
    236. ^ "The Ant, The Ants". Quran. Vol. Surah 27. pp. 18–19. Archived from the original on 1 January 2007.
    237. ^ Bukhari S. "Beginning of Creation". Sunnah. Vol. 4 Book 54. Archived from the original on 18 August 2000.
    238. ^ Mentioned once in the Quran, Muhammad Asad translates the verse as following: till, when they came upon a valley [full] of ants, and an ant exclaimed: "O you ants! Get into your dwellings, lest Solomon and his hosts crush you without [even] being aware [of you]! (27:18)"
    239. ^ Deen MY (1990). "Islamic Environmental Ethics, Law, and Society" (PDF). In Engel JR, Engel JG (eds.). Ethics of Environment and Development. Bellhaven Press, London. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 July 2011.
    240. ^ Balee WL (2000). "Antiquity of traditional ethnobiological knowledge in Amazonia: The Tupi-Guarani family and time". Ethnohistory. 47 (2): 399–422. doi:10.1215/00141801-47-2-399. S2CID 162813070.
    241. ^ Cesard N, Deturche J, Erikson P (2003). "Les Insectes dans les pratiques médicinales et rituelles d'Amazonie indigène". In Motte-Florac E, Thomas JM (eds.). Les insectes dans la tradition orale (in French). Peeters-Selaf, Paris. pp. 395–406.
    242. ^ Schmidt RJ (May 1985). "The super-nettles. A dermatologist's guide to ants in the plants". International Journal of Dermatology. 24 (4): 204–210. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1985.tb05760.x. PMID 3891647. S2CID 73875767.
    243. ^ Servius, Commentary on Virgil's Aeneid 4.402; Smith 1873, s.v. Myrmex
    244. ^ Twain M (1880). "22 The Black Forest and Its Treasures". A Tramp Abroad. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-510137-9. Retrieved 13 December 2015. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
    245. ^ Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey (2021). "A Green Hell Makes Better Germans: Carl Stephenson's "Leiningen" and the Almost Aryan Countertextual Army Ants". The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory. 96 (4): 339–356. doi:10.1080/00168890.2021.1977228. ISSN 0016-8890. S2CID 245125375.
    246. ^ Wilson, EO (25 January 2010). "Trailhead". The New Yorker. pp. 56–62.
    247. ^ Sharkey AJC (2006). "Robots, insects and swarm intelligence". Artificial Intelligence Review. 26 (4): 255–268. doi:10.1007/s10462-007-9057-y. S2CID 321326.
    248. ^ "1992 Excellence in Software Awards Winners". Software & Information Industry Association. Archived from the original on 11 June 2009. Retrieved 3 April 2008.

    Cited texts

    [edit]
    • Borror DJ, Triplehorn CA, Delong DM (1989). Introduction to the Study of Insects (6th ed.). Saunders College Publishing. ISBN 978-0-03-025397-3.
    • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990). The Ants. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-04075-5.

    Further reading

    [edit]
    • Bolton, Barry (1995). A New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-61514-4.
    • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1998). Journey to the Ants: A Story of Scientific Exploration. Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0-674-48526-6.
    • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009). The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance and Strangeness of Insect Societies. Norton & Co. ISBN 978-0-393-06704-0.

    External links

    [edit]
    Wikiquote has quotations related to Ant.
    Wikimedia Commons has media related to Formicidae.
    Wikispecies has information related to Formicidae.
    • AntWiki – Bringing Ants to the World
    • Wilson, Andrew (1878). "Ant" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. II (9th ed.). pp. 94–100.
    • AntWeb from The California Academy of Sciences
    • Ant Species Fact Sheets from the National Pest Management Association on Argentine, Carpenter, Pharaoh, Odorous, and other ant species
    • Ant Genera of the World – distribution maps
    • The super-nettles. A dermatologist's guide to ants-in-the-plants


    • v
    • t
    • e
    Types of ant
    Non-generic names
    • Army ant
    • Gliding ant
    • Harvester ant
    • Honeypot ant
    • Leafcutter ant
    • Pissant
    • Slave-making ant
    Castes
    • Drone ant
      • Alate
    • Queen ant
      • Alate
      • Ergatogyne
      • Mermithogyne
    • Worker ant
      • Gamergate
      • Mermithergate
      • Plerergate
    • v
    • t
    • e
    Extant Hymenopteran families
    • Kingdom: Animalia
    • Phylum: Arthropoda
    • Class: Insecta
    • Subclass: Pterygota
    • Infraclass: Neoptera
    • Superorder: Holometabola
    S
    y
    m
    p
    h
    y
    t
    a
    Tenthredinoidea
    • Argidae (argid sawflies)
    • Blasticotomidae (fern sawflies)
    • Cimbicidae (cimbicid sawflies)
    • Diprionidae (conifer sawflies)
    • Pergidae (pergid sawflies)
    • Tenthredinidae (common sawflies)
    • Zenargidae (cypress pine sawflies)
    Xyeloidea
    Xyelidae
    Pamphilioidea
    • Megalodontesidae
    • Pamphiliidae (web-spinning sawflies)
    Siricoidea
    • Anaxyelidae (cedar wood wasps)
    • Siricidae (horntails)
    Xiphydrioidea
    • Xiphydriidae (wood wasps)
    Cephoidea
    • Cephidae (stem sawflies)
    Orussoidea
    • Orussidae (parasitic wood wasps)
    A
    p
    o
    c
    r
    i
    t
    a
    P
    a
    r
    a
    s
    i
    t
    i
    c
    a
    Ichneumonoidea
    • Braconidae (braconids)
    • Ichneumonidae (ichneumon wasps)
    Ceraphronoidea
    • Ceraphronidae
    • Megaspilidae
    Proctotrupomorpha
    Platygastroidea
    • Geoscelionidae
    • Janzenellidae
    • Neuroscelionidae
    • Nixoniidae
    • Platygastridae
    • Scelionidae
    • Sparasionidae
    Cynipoidea
    • Austrocynipidae
    • Cynipidae (gall wasps)
    • Diplolepididae
    • Figitidae
    • Ibaliidae
    • Liopteridae
    Proctotrupoidea (s.str.)
    • Proctorenyxidae
    • Roproniidae
    • Heloridae
    • Pelecinidae
    • Peradeniidae
    • Proctotrupidae
    • Vanhorniidae
    Diaprioidea
    • Austroniidae
    • Diapriidae
    • Ismaridae
    • Maamingidae
    • Monomachidae
    Mymarommatoidea
    • Mymarommatidae
    Chalcidoidea
    (chalcid wasps)
    • Agaonidae (fig wasps)
    • Aphelinidae
    • Azotidae
    • Baeomorphidae
    • Boucekiidae
    • Calesidae
    • Ceidae
    • Cerocephalidae
    • Chalcedectidae
    • Chalcididae
    • Chrysolampidae
    • Cleonymidae
    • Coelocybidae
    • Cynipencyrtidae
    • Diparidae
    • Encyrtidae
    • Epichrysomallidae
    • Eucharitidae
    • Eulophidae
    • Eunotidae
    • Eupelmidae
    • Eurytomidae
    • Eutrichosomatidae
    • Herbertiidae
    • Hetreulophidae
    • Heydeniidae
    • Idioporidae
    • Leucospidae
    • Lyciscidae
    • Macromesidae
    • Megastigmidae
    • Melanosomellidae
    • Metapelmatidae
    • Moranilidae
    • Mymaridae (fairyflies)
    • Neanastatidae
    • Neodiparidae
    • Ooderidae
    • Ormyridae
    • Pelecinellidae
    • Perilampidae
    • Pirenidae
    • Pteromalidae
    • Signiphoridae
    • Spalangiidae
    • Systasidae
    • Tanaostigmatidae
    • Tetracampidae
    • Torymidae
    • Trichogrammatidae
    Evanioidea
    • Aulacidae
    • Evaniidae (ensign wasps)
    • Gasteruptiidae
    Stephanoidea
    • Stephanidae
    Megalyroidea
    • Megalyridae
    Trigonaloidea
    • Trigonalidae
    A
    c
    u
    l
    e
    a
    t
    a
    Chrysidoidea
    • Bethylidae
    • Chrysididae (cuckoo wasps)
    • Dryinidae
    • Embolemidae
    • Plumariidae
    • Sclerogibbidae
    • Scolebythidae
    Vespoidea
    • Rhopalosomatidae (rhopalosomatid wasps)
    • Vespidae (paper wasps, potter wasps, pollen wasps, yellowjackets, hornets)
    Tiphioidea
    • Bradynobaenidae
    • Tiphiidae (tiphiid wasps)
    Thynnoidea
    • Chyphotidae
    • Thynnidae (flower wasps)
    • Sierolomorphidae (sierolomorphid wasps)
    Pompiloidea
    • Mutillidae (velvet ants)
    • Myrmosidae
    • Pompilidae (spider wasps)
    • Sapygidae (sapygid, or club-horned wasps)
    Scolioidea
    • Scoliidae (scoliid wasps)
    Formicoidea
    • Formicidae (ants)
    Apoidea
    Spheciformes
    (sphecoid wasps)
    • Ammoplanidae
    • Ampulicidae (cockroach wasps)
    • Astatidae
    • Bembicidae
    • Crabronidae
    • Mellinidae
    • Pemphredonidae
    • Philanthidae
    • Psenidae
    • Sphecidae (thread-waisted wasps)
    Anthophila
    (bees)
    • Andrenidae (mason bees)
    • Apidae (honey bees, bumblebees, cuckoo bees, carpenter bees, orchid bees, stingless bees)
    • Colletidae (plasterer bees)
    • Halictidae (sweat bees)
    • Megachilidae (mason bees, leafcutter bees)
    • Melittidae
    • Stenotritidae
    • See also: Unicalcarida
    • v
    • t
    • e
    Ant taxonomy
    • Kingdom Animalia
    • Phylum Arthropoda
    • Class Insecta
    • Order Hymenoptera
    • Family Formicidae
    Subfamilies
    Extant
    • Agroecomyrmecinae
    • Amblyoponinae
    • Aneuretinae
    • Apomyrminae
    • Dolichoderinae
    • Dorylinae
    • Ectatomminae
    • Formicinae
    • Leptanillinae
    • Martialinae
    • Myrmeciinae
    • Myrmicinae
    • Paraponerinae
    • Ponerinae
    • Proceratiinae
    • Pseudomyrmecinae
    Extinct
    • †Armaniinae
    • †Brownimeciinae
    • †Formiciinae
    • †Haidomyrmecinae
    • †Sphecomyrminae
    Genera
    • List of ant genera
      • incertae sedis
    • v
    • t
    • e
    Eusociality
    Topics
    • Evolution of eusociality
    • Presociality
    • Social insects
      • Agriculture
      • Gamergate
      • Group selection
      • Haplodiploidy
      • Identity in social insects
      • Kin recognition
      • Kin selection
      • Polyethism
      • Sexual selection in insects
      • Social conflict
      • Thelytoky
      • War
      • Worker policing
    Groups
    • Hymenoptera
      • Ant
      • Apidae
      • Crabronidae
      • Halictidae
      • Honey bee
      • Vespidae
    • Mammalia
      • Blesmol
      • Dwarf mongoose
      • Meerkat
    • Crustacean
      • Synalpheus
    • Thysanoptera
      • Kladothrips
    • Hemiptera
      • Aphididae
    • Coleoptera
      • Austroplatypus incompertus
    • Isoptera
    In culture
    • Bees in mythology
    • Coalescent
    Pioneers, works
    • Karl von Frisch
      • The Dancing Bees 1927
    • Charles Duncan Michener
      • The Bees of the World 2000
    • Bert Hölldobler
    • E. O. Wilson
      • Sociobiology: The New Synthesis 1975
      • The Ants 1990
      • Journey to the Ants 1994
    Taxon identifiers
    Formicidae
    • Wikidata: Q7386
    • Wikispecies: Formicidae
    • ADW: Formicidae
    • AFD: Formicidae
    • BOLD: 685
    • BugGuide: 165
    • CoL: 623T5
    • EoL: 699
    • EPPO: 1FORMF
    • Fauna Europaea: 11356
    • Fauna Europaea (new): a9d51445-1393-482b-9ef5-4837fb827590
    • GBIF: 4342
    • iNaturalist: 47336
    • IRMNG: 101758
    • ITIS: 154193
    • NBN: NBNSYS0000037030
    • NCBI: 36668
    • NZOR: cc4a826f-854a-47fa-bb2c-8da6da11ab17
    • Open Tree of Life: 7376225
    • Paleobiology Database: 70728
    • Plazi: E378AE58-D311-FFFF-FF78-FB014CA57281
    • WoRMS: 425369
    Authority control databases Edit this at Wikidata
    International
    • GND
    National
    • United States
    • France
    • BnF data
    • Japan
    • Czech Republic
    • Spain
    • Israel
    Other
    • Yale LUX
    Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

    Ant

    View on Grokipedia
    from Grokipedia
    Ants are eusocial insects belonging to the family Formicidae within the order Hymenoptera, characterized by complex colony structures featuring reproductive queens, sterile female workers, and males, with communication primarily through pheromones and physical interactions.[1] Originating approximately 140–160 million years ago during the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous periods, ants have diversified into more than 14,000 described species, with an estimated total exceeding 20,000 worldwide, colonizing nearly all terrestrial habitats except polar ice caps and extreme high-altitude environments above permanent snowlines.[1][2] Their evolutionary success stems from haplodiploid sex determination, advanced social organization, and adaptations like a modified ovipositor for stinging in many species.[1] Biologically, ants exhibit a wide range of sizes from 0.08 to 1 inch, with body colors including black, brown, red, or yellow, and distinctive features such as elbowed antennae and a narrow "waist" connecting the thorax and abdomen.[3] Queens, the primary reproducers, can lay thousands of eggs, while workers forage, defend the colony, and care for the brood; some species display worker polymorphism, with specialized castes for tasks like cutting leaves in fungus-farming ants.[3] Colonies can range from a few dozen to millions of individuals, functioning as "superorganisms" where the group behaves as a unified entity.[3] Ecologically, ants play pivotal roles as predators of small invertebrates, scavengers, seed dispersers, and ecosystem engineers that aerate soil and influence nutrient cycling, with densities reaching up to 8 million individuals per hectare in tropical rainforests; ants collectively represent about 20% of the total terrestrial animal biomass, estimated at 20 million metric tons.[4][5] As omnivores, their diet encompasses nectar, seeds, fungi, and other insects, though some army ants prey on larger vertebrates like reptiles and birds.[3] However, invasive species such as the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) disrupt native biodiversity and cause significant economic damage, estimated at $51 billion globally from 1930 to 2021.[4]

    Nomenclature and Systematics

    Etymology

    The English word "ant" derives from Old English ǣmete, which in turn comes from Proto-Germanic *ai-maitjǭ meaning "biting-off" or "cutter," reflecting the insect's biting habit.[6] This Germanic root is connected to Proto-Indo-European *mai- "to cut," and cognates include Old High German ameiza and Old Norse meita "to bite."[6] In contrast, many other Indo-European languages trace their terms for ant to the Proto-Indo-European root *morwi- "ant," which appears in forms denoting the insect's form or appearance.[7] In Latin, the word formica for "ant" stems directly from *morwi-, a dissimilation where the initial m shifted, and it serves as the basis for scientific terms like the family Formicidae and formic acid, isolated from ants in 1749.[7] Similarly, Ancient Greek myrmēx "ant" originates from the same *morwi- root, influencing words like "myrmecology," the study of ants, and mythological references such as the Myrmidons, a tribe mythically transformed from ants.[8] The evolution of scientific nomenclature for ants began with Carl Linnaeus's Systema Naturae in 1758, where he established the genus Formica—Latin for "ant"—initially encompassing all known ant species before subsequent subdivisions into modern genera.[9] Linnaeus's binomial system formalized naming, with Formica rufa (red wood ant) as a type species, building on classical roots to create a standardized framework.[10] Cultural naming variations often highlight ant behaviors or traits, as seen in indigenous languages; for instance, the Mayan term zompopo for large leafcutter ants (Atta spp.) combines zonm "ant" and popo "swollen" or "big," alluding to their swarming flights and robust size during nuptial seasons.[11] In Southeast Asian contexts, the Malay name kerengga for weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina) derives from kereng "to weave," capturing their nest-building by stitching leaves with silk.

    Taxonomy

    Ants belong to the kingdom Animalia, phylum Arthropoda, class Insecta, order Hymenoptera, superfamily Formicoidea, and family Formicidae.[12] This family encompasses all true ants, distinguished by key synapomorphies such as the metapleural gland, which produces antimicrobial secretions, and a characteristic waist with one or two nodes connecting the mesosoma to the gaster.[13] The family Formicidae is currently classified into 16 extant subfamilies, encompassing 346 genera and more than 15,000 described species, with estimates indicating a total of 20,000–22,000 species worldwide (as of 2025).[14][15] Subfamilies are primarily delimited by morphological traits including the number and structure of petiolar segments, presence or absence of a functional sting, pygidial gland morphology, and queen caste characteristics. For instance, the subfamily Myrmicinae, the most species-rich with over 7,000 described species, typically features workers with a sting, two petiolar nodes, and diverse foraging strategies such as fungus cultivation or aphid herding.[14] In contrast, Formicinae lacks a sting but possesses an acidopore for ejecting formic acid, along with a single petiolar node and often robust queens. Dolichoderinae also lacks a sting, instead having a slit-like pygidial orifice, and is noted for trail pheromones produced by the pygidial gland. Ponerinae, representing more basal forms, generally includes workers with a prominent sting and a single petiolar node, while queens are similar in size to workers but retain wings and ocelli for nuptial flights. Dorylinae (including former Ecitoninae) is characterized by nomadic army ant behavior, highly ergatoid (worker-like) queens that are often wingless and physogastric (enlarged abdomen for egg production), and a functional sting in workers.[16][14] Since the early 2000s, molecular phylogenetic analyses have driven major taxonomic revisions within Formicidae, refining subfamily boundaries and resurrecting or establishing genera to align with evolutionary relationships. For example, a 2016 study reclassified Formicinae based on multigene phylogenetics, resurrecting genera such as Colobopsis and Dinomyrmex and reorganizing tribes to reflect monophyly.[17] Similarly, the Dorylinae underwent revision in 2016, consolidating army ant genera into monophyletic groups defined by shared morphological and molecular synapomorphies like reduced eyes and specialized mandibular structures. More recently, the Leptanillinae subfamily saw a genus-level overhaul in 2024, integrating DNA sequence data with morphology to delimit taxa and resolve long-standing ambiguities in this cryptic group.[18] These updates, often incorporating mitochondrial and nuclear markers, have enhanced the resolution of deeper ant phylogenies without altering the core 16-subfamily framework.[14]

    Evolution

    The earliest known ant fossils date to the mid-Cretaceous period, approximately 113 million years ago, during the Albian stage. These include the stem-group ant Vulcanidris cratensis preserved in limestone from northeastern Brazil, which represents the oldest definitive evidence of the family Formicidae and bridges the morphological gap between wasps and modern ants.[19] Additional Cretaceous fossils from Myanmar and other sites, including Sphecomyrma freyi from Cenomanian amber (ca. 95 million years ago) in New Jersey, USA, confirm that early ants were rare and morphologically primitive, resembling their sphecoid wasp ancestors with retained wing venation and ovipositor structures.[20][21] A key evolutionary innovation in ants was the emergence of eusociality, characterized by cooperative brood care, reproductive division of labor, and overlapping generations, which originated over 150 million years ago in the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous.[22] Fossil evidence from 99-million-year-old Myanmar amber reveals polymorphic castes, including queens and workers, indicating advanced social behaviors such as trophallaxis and nest defense were already present by this time.[23][24] Accompanying these social advances were adaptations like the loss of wings in workers, freeing thoracic space for enhanced musculature and sensory organs, and the development of sophisticated chemical communication via pheromones for trail marking, alarm signaling, and kin recognition. Recent phylogenomic analyses of 163 ant genomes (2025) confirm the Late Jurassic origin and highlight adaptive radiations driven by social evolution.[22] Ant diversification accelerated in the Paleogene period following the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event around 66 million years ago, coinciding with the Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution—the rapid radiation of flowering plants that reshaped terrestrial ecosystems. This co-evolutionary dynamic buffered ants against extinction by providing new foraging opportunities, such as nectar and plant exudates, and facilitated niche expansion from primarily carnivorous habits to include herbivory and mutualisms.[25] Major radiations occurred later, including the evolution of army ants (subfamily Dorylinae) and leafcutter ants (tribe Attini) in the Neotropics during the Miocene epoch (23–5 million years ago), driven by climatic shifts and the availability of diverse plant resources that supported specialized predatory swarms and fungus-culturing agriculture, respectively.[26][27]

    Distribution and Diversity

    Global Distribution

    Ants exhibit a near-cosmopolitan distribution, inhabiting every continent except Antarctica and being absent from certain remote polar regions and isolated islands, such as Greenland and pre-human Hawaii. This widespread presence spans diverse terrestrial ecosystems, from arid deserts to humid rainforests and even urban environments modified by human activity. Their global reach is facilitated by remarkable adaptability to varying climatic conditions and the inadvertent transport by humans, which has enabled colonization of previously uninhabited areas.[5][28] Ant diversity is highest in tropical regions, with richness peaking in areas like the Amazon basin, where local sites can harbor hundreds of species and regional estimates exceed 1,000 described taxa. This tropical concentration decreases progressively toward higher latitudes and polar zones, reflecting sensitivity to temperature gradients and habitat availability. Biogeographically, ants dominate in the Afrotropical and Neotropical realms, where evolutionary history and stable climates have fostered exceptional speciation. For instance, the Neotropics encompass vast rainforests supporting dense ant assemblages, while the Afrotropics feature unique savanna and woodland communities.[29][30] Invasive species, such as the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), exemplify human-mediated spread, originating from South America but now established across six continents in temperate and subtropical zones, often outcompeting native fauna. Ants occupy altitudinal ranges from sea level to over 4,000 meters, as observed in Andean transects, adapting to montane forests, páramos, and high-elevation grasslands through physiological tolerances to hypoxia and cold. This elevational versatility, combined with habitat breadth—from hyper-arid Namib Desert dunes to Southeast Asian peat swamps—underscores their ecological resilience worldwide.[31][32]

    Species Diversity

    Ants exhibit remarkable species diversity within the family Formicidae, with over 16,000 described species and subspecies worldwide as of 2025.[33] Estimates suggest a total of 20,000 to 25,000 species, including undescribed taxa, the majority of which remain undocumented in tropical regions due to their dense biodiversity and challenging field conditions.[5] This diversity underscores ants' ecological adaptability across habitats, though much of the undescribed richness is concentrated in biodiverse hotspots like rainforests. Among the 17 extant subfamilies, Myrmicinae dominates with over 6,700 species, representing a significant portion of global ant diversity through its varied genera and ecological roles.[34] Formicinae follows as the second most speciose subfamily, encompassing approximately 3,600 described species known for traits like the acid-spraying defense mechanism.[35] These two subfamilies alone account for more than half of all described ant species, highlighting the concentration of evolutionary innovation within a few lineages. Notable groups exemplify specialized diversity within this broader spectrum; for instance, the New World army ants of the subfamily Ecitoninae comprise around 150 to 200 species across five genera, characterized by nomadic, raiding behaviors.[36] In contrast, weaver ants of the genus Oecophylla include just two species—O. smaragdina and O. longinoda—yet achieve widespread distribution across tropical Asia, Africa, and Australia through their unique silk-weaving nest construction.[37] Endemism further accentuates ant diversity in isolated regions, such as Madagascar, which hosts over 1,300 ant species, with approximately 90% endemic to the island, reflecting its long geological isolation.[38] Similarly, Australia features unique lineages like the bulldog ants (Myrmecia spp.), with nearly 100 species almost entirely endemic, belonging to the primitive subfamily Myrmeciinae and noted for their aggressive foraging and potent stings.[39]

    Morphology

    Head

    The head of an ant serves as the primary site for sensory perception and feeding, housing specialized structures adapted to diverse ecological roles. Compound eyes, composed of numerous ommatidia, vary significantly in size and development across species; day-active ants possess large eyes for visual hunting, while subterranean or nocturnal species exhibit reduced eyes or lack them entirely.[40] Ocelli, or simple eyes, are typically absent in workers but present in alate queens and males to aid in flight and light detection during mating.[41] Antennae emerge from the head as the principal sensory appendages, characterized by their elbowed, or geniculate, structure in most species, which allows flexible movement for environmental exploration. In workers, antennae consist of 12 segments, with the distal segments richly endowed with chemosensory receptors for detecting pheromones, food odors, and nestmate cues through olfaction and gustation.[42] These organs enable ants to navigate complex terrains and communicate chemically within colonies.[40] Mandibles, the robust paired jaws protruding from the head, are versatile tools for manipulation, varying in size and shape due to polymorphism that reflects caste and species-specific adaptations. In many species, mandibles facilitate biting, cutting vegetation, or carrying loads, while in specialized trap-jaw ants like Odontomachus bauri, they function as spring-loaded mechanisms that snap shut at speeds up to 140 miles per hour (approximately 60 meters per second) for prey capture or defense.[43] Such variations underscore the head's role in task specialization, with larger mandibles in soldiers for combat or foraging.[40] The mouthparts, concealed beneath the mandibles, include paired maxillae and a labium that form a sucking apparatus suited for liquid feeding, such as nectar or hemolymph. These structures connect to the crop, a social stomach that stores regurgitated food for trophallaxis, the mouth-to-mouth exchange enabling nutrient distribution among colony members.[44] This system supports the ants' liquid-dominated diet and social cohesion.[45]

    Mesosoma

    The mesosoma, or alitrunk, represents the fused thoracic region in ants, comprising the three thoracic segments—pronotum (prothorax), mesonotum (mesothorax), and metanotum (metathorax)—along with the propodeum, which is the tergite of the first abdominal segment integrated into this structure. This fusion creates a compact, box-like unit that serves as the primary locomotor apparatus, housing muscles for leg movement and supporting the overall body propulsion. In worker ants, the mesosoma lacks wings, limiting them to terrestrial locomotion without sustained flight capabilities, unlike the winged alates. The pronotum typically articulates freely with the mesonotum, while the mesonotum and metanotum are tightly fused to the propodeum, enhancing structural rigidity for rapid ground maneuvers.[46][47] Ants possess three pairs of jointed legs attached to the mesosoma, enabling versatile locomotion across diverse terrains. Each leg consists of a coxa (basal segment), trochanter, femur, tibia, and a tarsus divided into five tarsomeres, terminating in a pair of curved tarsal claws that provide grip on rough surfaces during foraging and nest-building activities. In certain species, such as those in the genus Protanilla, an arolium—a soft, adhesive pad located between the claws—facilitates climbing on smooth vertical substrates by generating capillary adhesion. These leg adaptations allow ants to achieve speeds up to several body lengths per second, supporting efficient colony expansion.[47][48] In reproductive alates (queens and males), the mesosoma supports wing attachment, with the forewings emerging from the mesonotum and hindwings from the metanotum, enabling the nuptial flight essential for mating. Post-mating, queens discard their wings at the base, transitioning to a dealate form focused on colony founding; the shed wings often serve as a nutrient source during initial egg-laying. The mesosoma's internal musculature, including direct and indirect flight muscles repurposed in workers for leg power, is densely packed to enable quick, coordinated movements. Notably, the propodeum forms a constricted, petiole-like junction posteriorly, articulating flexibly with the petiole (second abdominal segment) to connect to the gaster, allowing independent flexion of the abdomen for tasks like stinging or pheromone release.[46][49][50]

    Metasoma

    The metasoma of ants comprises the posterior tagma of the body, beginning after the propodeum of the mesosoma and consisting of abdominal segments II through X. It is divided into an anterior petiole, typically formed by one or two narrow nodes (segments II and sometimes III), which provides a flexible articulation with the mesosoma, and a posterior gaster encompassing the remaining segments (IV–X) that are more flexible and house major internal organs such as the digestive tract, reproductive system, excretory structures, and respiratory components.[51] This division allows for significant maneuverability, enabling the gaster to bend forward over the body for various functions.[40] In many Formicidae subfamilies, the metasoma includes a sting apparatus derived from modified ovipositor components, which lacks a functional egg-laying ovipositor but incorporates a venom gland, reservoir, and musculature for venom delivery through the sting.[52] The sting's valves are formed by gonapophyses, with surrounding gonostyli providing flexibility and support during extrusion.[51] Queens feature a spermatheca within the gaster for storing sperm received during mating, supporting lifelong egg fertilization without remating.[53] Workers possess poison glands integrated into the sting apparatus, producing defensive secretions that complement the venom.[54] The gaster exhibits adaptive features in some species, such as temporary inflation or raising to enhance pheromone dispersal during alarm signaling or recruitment.[55] Additionally, in stridulating ants, rapid dorsoventral movements of the gaster rub a file-like pars stridens against a scraper (plectrum), generating vibrational signals for communication, often synchronized with abdominal pulses.[50] Gaster size and proportions vary by caste, with queens having enlarged structures for reproduction and workers optimized for defense or foraging tasks.[51]

    Polymorphism

    Ant polymorphism refers to the striking morphological diversity observed within colonies, primarily manifested through distinct castes that enable division of labor. These castes arise from the same genome but develop differently based on developmental cues, resulting in specialized forms adapted for reproduction or colony maintenance. The primary castes include queens, males, and workers, with workers often exhibiting further subcastes known as polymorphism.[56] Queens, the reproductive females, are typically larger than workers and possess wings for nuptial flights, along with enlarged ovaries capable of producing thousands of eggs over their lifespan.[57][56] Males, in contrast, are smaller, winged individuals that develop from unfertilized eggs and are haploid, possessing only half the chromosome number of females; their primary role is to mate with queens during swarming events.[58] Workers, the sterile females that comprise the majority of the colony, are wingless and have reduced compound eyes, ocelli, and reproductive organs, but show considerable size variation across species.[56] Worker polymorphism, present in about 13% of ant species, involves discrete size classes within the worker caste, often termed minors and majors or soldiers, which differ in body proportions and head size to suit specific tasks. Minor workers are smaller, with narrower heads and longer legs suited for foraging and rapid movement, while major workers or soldiers are larger, featuring disproportionately enlarged heads and powerful mandibles for defense against predators or cutting tough materials. In leafcutter ants (Atta and Acromyrmex species), this polymorphism extends to include media workers of intermediate size, which specialize in transporting leaf fragments back to the nest, alongside minim workers for brood care and fungus tending.[59] Some ant species exhibit ergatomorphs, which are winged workers or worker-like individuals with reproductive capabilities, representing an intermediate form between typical workers and queens in certain lineages.[56] In queenless colonies of certain ponerine ants, gamergates—mated workers that assume reproductive roles—maintain a worker-like morphology but develop functional ovaries and spermathecae after mating, allowing them to lay fertilized eggs.[60] Caste determination in ants is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, with larval nutrition playing a pivotal role in most species.[61] Well-fed larvae, receiving higher quantities of protein-rich food from nurse workers, tend to develop into larger queens or majors, while nutritionally restricted larvae become smaller workers or minors; this threshold response ensures adaptive caste ratios based on colony needs.[56] In some species, genetic predispositions, such as allelic differences at specific loci, bias caste outcomes independently of nutrition, though environmental cues often override or modulate these effects.[61][62]

    Genetics and Physiology

    Genome Size

    The haploid genome size of ants is generally small compared to many other insects, averaging approximately 0.36 pg across sampled species, though it exhibits significant variation. This range spans from a minimum of 0.11 pg in Myrmica rubra to a maximum of 0.67 pg in Camponotus vagus, reflecting a threefold diversity that is lower overall than the broader insect average of about 1.29 pg. Such compact genomes may contribute to the evolutionary efficiency observed in ant lineages, though the precise drivers of this variation remain under investigation.[63][64][65] A notable feature of ant genomes is the extensive expansion of gene families involved in chemical communication, particularly odorant receptors (ORs). Ants possess up to around 700 OR genes, far exceeding the roughly 60 in Drosophila melanogaster, enabling sophisticated pheromone detection essential for social coordination. These expansions likely arose through tandem duplications and adaptive evolution, highlighting genomic adaptations to eusocial lifestyles.[66][67] Polyploidy is rare among ants, with most species maintaining standard diploidy in females and haploidy in males due to haplodiploid sex determination. In this system, females develop from fertilized diploid eggs, while males arise parthenogenetically from unfertilized haploid eggs, promoting genetic relatedness that underpins colony cooperation. Exceptions involving polyploidy are infrequent and typically linked to specific ecological contexts, such as in certain invasive populations.[68][69] Genomic sequencing of ants began in earnest around 2010–2011 with the publication of the first high-quality assemblies for species including the Florida carpenter ant (Camponotus floridanus) and the leafcutter ant (Acromyrmex echinatior). By 2025, 163 ant genomes have been sequenced through initiatives like the Global Ant Genomics Alliance, uncovering expansions in gene families tied to eusociality, such as those for sensory processing and division of labor. Comparative analyses reveal extensive genome rearrangements correlated with the evolution of eusociality. These resources have illuminated molecular underpinnings of ant social evolution without relying on extensive polyploid mechanisms.[70][22]

    Sensory Systems

    Ants possess a suite of sensory organs that enable them to perceive their environment, with chemical senses playing a dominant role in social and foraging activities. The antennae house the primary chemoreceptors, including olfactory receptors (ORs), gustatory receptors (GRs), and ionotropic receptors (IRs), which detect a wide array of pheromones and environmental odors. These receptors are housed in specialized sensilla on the antennal surface, allowing ants to sense trail pheromones, such as nerolic acid in Camponotus floridanus, and alarm pheromones, like undecane in Formica argentea, facilitating rapid colony responses. Gustatory receptors further enable contact chemoreception for taste, including detection of carbon dioxide despite the absence of canonical CO₂-specific receptors.[71][71][71] Vibrational cues are detected primarily through mechanoreceptive structures, notably the Johnston's organ located in the second segment of the antenna. This chordotonal organ senses deflections of the antennal flagellum caused by substrate-borne vibrations, which are critical for perceiving stridulatory signals from conspecifics, though it is insensitive to airborne sound due to low signal amplitudes below the threshold of antennal sensilla. Ants respond robustly to these vibrations transmitted through the ground, as demonstrated in behavioral assays with species like Atta and Myrmica, underscoring the organ's role in near-field communication without true auditory capabilities.[72][72] The visual system in ants is generally limited, with compound eyes varying in size and acuity across species, often supplemented or overshadowed by other modalities. Diurnal ants, such as Myrmecia croslandi, exhibit trichromatic vision supported by three spectrally distinct photoreceptors peaking at ultraviolet (370 nm), blue (470 nm), and green (510 nm), enabling color discrimination comparable to that in some vertebrates. However, many ant species, particularly nocturnal or subterranean ones, possess reduced eyes and rely more on mechanoreception through cuticular hairs (setae), which serve as tactile sensors distributed across the body to detect air currents, obstacles, and substrate textures. These mechanoreceptive setae, connected to sensory neurons, provide essential feedback for close-range orientation, as seen in diverse hymenopteran cuticular structures.[73][73][74] Tactile and humidity sensing occur via specialized sensilla on the antennae and legs, aiding in microhabitat assessment. Antennal sensilla include mechanoreceptors for touch and hygroreceptors that detect relative humidity gradients, allowing ants to locate moist environments and avoid desiccation, as evidenced by electrophysiological responses in antennal flagella. Leg tarsi bear similar tactile hairs and humidity-sensitive structures, contributing to substrate evaluation during movement, with these sensors integrating physical and chemical inputs for precise environmental mapping.[75][76] Sensory information converges in the ant brain, where enlarged mushroom bodies facilitate learning and multimodal integration. These structures, prominent in the protocerebrum, process olfactory, visual, and mechanosensory inputs, storing long-term memories essential for tasks like route following, as shown by experiments where silencing mushroom bodies with procaine impairs visual navigation in wood ants (Formica rufa) and bull ants (Myrmecia pyriformis). Recent 2020s studies highlight multimodal sensory fusion in the mushroom bodies and central complex, where ants combine visual snapshots, olfactory cues (e.g., pheromones and CO₂), and idiothetic signals for robust navigation, with faster learning observed when modalities are presented together in species like Cataglyphis velox. This integration supports adaptive behaviors, drawing parallels to hippocampal functions in vertebrates.[77][77][78]

    Locomotion Mechanisms

    Ants primarily employ an alternating tripod gait for terrestrial locomotion, in which three legs—typically the front and hind legs on one side and the middle leg on the opposite side—move synchronously while the other three support the body.[79] This pattern maintains stability across a broad range of speeds and is conserved even during turns, with footfall positions exhibiting spatial rigidity.[79] In species like the Saharan silver ant (Cataglyphis bombycina), this gait enables peak speeds of up to 0.855 m/s, equivalent to 108 body lengths per second, achieved through rapid stride frequencies and leg swing amplitudes.[80] Body size influences locomotion via allometric scaling, where leg length increases disproportionately with mesosoma length, following the relation y=a×xby = a \times x^by=a×xb with b>1b > 1b>1 in desert ants such as Cataglyphis albicans and Cataglyphis bicolor.[81] This positive allometry enhances stride length in larger individuals, contributing to higher absolute walking speeds, though relative speed (body lengths per second) often decreases with size due to biomechanical constraints.[81] Overall, maximum running speed scales approximately with body length to the power of 0.67 across ant species, reflecting geometric similarity in limb kinematics and stride dynamics.[82] For climbing, ants utilize tarsal claws for mechanical interlocking with rough surfaces and arolia—soft, adhesive pads at the pretarsus—for attachment to smooth substrates.[83] The arolia generate frictional and adhesive forces via a thin fluid layer, enabling ants to support loads up to 100 times their body weight, as observed in species like the Asian weaver ant (Oecophylla smaragdina).[84] This adhesion is rate-dependent, with peak forces at low detachment speeds, allowing efficient vertical and inverted locomotion.[85] Burrowing involves coordinated leg movements to excavate soil, where forelegs scrape and push material while middle and hind legs propel the body forward, adapting kinematics to tunnel geometry for efficient displacement.[86] In rafting behaviors, such as those of fire ants (Solenopsis invicta), interlocked legs form a cohesive structure, supported by the mildly hydrophobic cuticle (contact angle ~102°) that traps air and enhances buoyancy during floods.[87] Leg kinematics in rafts involve tangential gripping motions to maintain integrity under shear forces.[88] Ant locomotion exhibits high energy efficiency, underpinned by low resting metabolic rates ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 ml O₂/g/h, which scale allometrically with body mass (typically as mass^{-0.25}).[89] During activity, oxygen consumption rises modestly—e.g., to ~1.8 ml O₂/g/h in walking harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex)—due to optimized gait mechanics that minimize energetic costs per distance traveled.[90] This efficiency supports sustained movement in diverse environments.

    Life Cycle

    Reproduction

    Reproduction in ants primarily occurs through nuptial flights, during which winged sexual forms known as alates—comprising queens and males—emerge synchronously from mature colonies to mate in swarms. These flights are typically triggered by environmental cues such as temperature and humidity, often occurring in warm, humid conditions after rain. During the flight, queens mate with multiple males, a behavior observed in many species including leafcutter ants, where genetic analyses confirm high levels of multiple paternity.[91][92][93] After mating, queens store the sperm in a specialized organ called the spermatheca, which allows them to fertilize eggs throughout their reproductive lifespan without further mating. This stored sperm remains viable for over a decade in many species, enabling lifelong reproduction.[94][95] Ants exhibit haplodiploid sex determination, a system characteristic of the Hymenoptera order, where females develop from fertilized diploid eggs and males from unfertilized haploid eggs. This mechanism results in female workers and queens being more closely related to their sisters (relatedness coefficient of 0.75) than to their brothers (0.25), theoretically favoring a 3:1 female-biased sex investment ratio at the colony level to maximize inclusive fitness. In some species, this asymmetry leads to worker policing, where workers preferentially destroy eggs laid by other workers to prevent reproduction by non-queens, thereby promoting the rearing of queen-preferred offspring. Comparative studies across ants, bees, and wasps support this policing behavior as a mechanism to resolve reproductive conflicts.[96][97][98] Following nuptial flights, mated queens initiate new colonies through one of two main founding strategies: claustral or dependent. In claustral founding, the queen independently excavates a chamber, seals it, and rears her first worker offspring using only her body reserves, a energetically demanding process common in many higher ant subfamilies. Dependent founding, by contrast, involves queens relying on assistance from workers—either from their natal colony or through parasitic takeover of existing nests—allowing for reduced energy expenditure but often in saturated habitats. Queens can achieve remarkable longevity, with lifespans reaching up to 30 years in some species, far exceeding those of workers.[99][100][101]

    Development Stages

    Ants undergo complete metamorphosis, progressing through four distinct developmental stages: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. This holometabolous life cycle ensures specialization at each phase, with the larval stage focused on growth and the pupal stage on restructuring the body for adulthood.[102] The cycle begins with the egg stage, where queens lay small, oval-shaped, white eggs measuring approximately 0.1 to 1 mm in length. These eggs are typically translucent and sticky, adhering to surfaces within the nest for protection. Eggs hatch after 7 to 21 days, depending on environmental conditions.[103][104] Upon hatching, ants enter the larval stage, which consists of 3 to 5 instars characterized by rapid growth and molting. Larvae are legless, grub-like, and largely immobile, relying entirely on worker ants for nourishment through trophallaxis—a process where workers regurgitate liquid food directly into the larvae's mouths. This feeding regime supports the larvae's high metabolic demands, with larger or more frequent meals influencing developmental outcomes. The larval period lasts 1 to 3 weeks.[105][106] Caste determination occurs primarily during the larval phase and is driven by differential feeding. Larvae destined to become queens receive richer, more abundant nutrition—analogous to the royal jelly fed to honeybee larvae—promoting larger body size and reproductive development, while worker-destined larvae are fed more conservatively to limit growth. This nutritional control, often mediated by juvenile hormone levels, can interact with genetic and environmental factors to finalize caste fate by the final instar.[56][107] At the end of the larval stage, fully grown larvae pupate, either forming a protective silk cocoon (as in many formicine ants) or developing as naked pupae without one (common in dolichoderines like Argentine ants). During pupation, the larval body undergoes histolysis and histogenesis, culminating in eclosion where the adult ant emerges with a hardened exoskeleton through sclerotization—a process that cross-links proteins in the cuticle for rigidity. Pupae are immobile and non-feeding, lasting 1 to 3 weeks.[108][109][110] The total development time from egg to adult typically spans 2 to 6 weeks, significantly influenced by temperature and humidity; warmer conditions (around 25–30°C) accelerate metamorphosis, while cooler or drier environments prolong it and may reduce survival rates. In some species exhibiting thelytokous parthenogenesis, such as the fungus-gardening ant Mycocepurus smithii, unfertilized eggs develop directly into females, bypassing male involvement and allowing clonal reproduction.[111][112][113]

    Colonies and Nests

    Ant colonies vary widely in size, ranging from small queenless groups of approximately 10 to 20 individuals in species like certain ponerine ants to massive supercolonies comprising millions or even billions of workers.[114] In queenless colonies, workers reproduce via gamergates, maintaining small societies without a reproductive queen.[115] At the opposite extreme, supercolonies such as those formed by the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) can span continents, with the European supercolony covering over 6,000 kilometers and containing billions of individuals.[116] Ant nests exhibit diverse architectures adapted to environmental conditions, including subterranean soil chambers, arboreal carton structures, and leaf-tied nests. Subterranean nests, common in many species like harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.), consist of interconnected chambers and tunnels excavated in soil, providing protection and humidity control.[117] Arboreal carton nests, built by fungus-growing ants such as Atta and Acromyrmex, are constructed from chewed plant material mixed with fungal hyphae, forming durable, fungus-cultivated galleries in trees or soil.[118] Weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina) create nests by binding leaves together with silk produced by larvae, forming enclosed arboreal structures. Ventilation in these nests is achieved through air currents facilitated by tunnel designs, such as turrets in leaf-cutting ant mounds that enhance wind-induced airflow to regulate carbon dioxide levels and temperature.[119] Colony founding methods influence genetic diversity and structure, with queens in many species engaging in multiple matings to increase variability within the colony. For instance, leaf-cutter ant queens (Acromyrmex octospinosus) mate with 4 to 10 males, promoting diverse offspring genotypes that enhance colony resilience.[120] Founding can occur via independent colony establishment by a single mated queen or through budding and fission in polygynous species, where portions of the colony, including queens and workers, split off to form new nests nearby. Budding is prevalent in invasive species like the odorous house ant (Tapinoma sessile), allowing rapid expansion without the risks of solitary founding.[121] Supercolonies represent a recent evolutionary phenomenon in introduced ant populations, characterized by unicoloniality and reduced inter-nest aggression due to low genetic relatedness. The Argentine ant's European supercolony, established following invasions in the early 1900s, exemplifies this, as multiple nests merge into vast networks with minimal hostility, facilitating dominance over native species.[116] This shift from multicellular to unicolonial structures has enabled unprecedented ecological impacts since the species' global spread.[122]

    Behavior and Ecology

    Communication

    Ants primarily communicate through chemical pheromones, which enable coordination of colony activities such as foraging and defense, supplemented by tactile, vibrational, and occasionally visual signals.[123] Pheromones are volatile or semi-volatile compounds released from specialized glands, allowing precise messaging over distances within the colony or along trails. These signals are detected via antennal chemoreceptors, facilitating rapid information transfer among nestmates.[124] Trail pheromones guide ants to resources, with (Z)-9-hexadecenal serving as a key component in Argentine ants (Linepithema humile), promoting efficient recruitment by eliciting trail-following behavior.[125] Alarm pheromones, such as formic acid from the venom gland in species like Camponotus aethiops, trigger defensive responses and modulate olfactory learning to enhance odor discrimination.[124] Recruitment pheromones often involve hydrocarbons, including undecane from the Dufour's gland in Paratrechina longicornis and various alkanes in trail-laying species, which stimulate nestmates to join activities by marking routes or aggregating workers.[126] Tactile communication occurs through antennation, where ants touch antennae to exchange information and recognize nestmates via cuticular hydrocarbons, ensuring colony cohesion.[127] Stridulation, involving abdominal rubbing against a file-like structure, generates substrate-borne vibrations detectable by subgenual organs in legs, conveying contextual signals like food profitability or distress in species such as Myrmica scabrinodis.[50] Visual signals are rare in ants due to their limited eyesight, but occur in tandem running by species like Temnothorax albipennis, where a leader ant guides a follower using physical contact supplemented by route cues.[128] Pheromone trails persist for hours to days, with networks in Lasius niger lasting up to 24 hours without reinforcement, allowing sustained guidance while ants learn to optimize paths through repeated exposure.[129] Recent 2020s studies reveal multi-pheromone blends, such as 9:1 mixtures of 4-methyl-3-heptanone and 4-methyl-3-heptanol in Harpegnathos saltator, processed in the antennal lobe to enable age-dependent communication adaptability.[130]

    Foraging and Food Cultivation

    Ants employ diverse foraging strategies to locate and procure food resources, adapting to environmental conditions and colony needs. Individual scouting is common, where solitary workers explore territories, assess food sources, and return to recruit nestmates via pheromonal trails or physical contact if the resource is deemed valuable.[131] In contrast, group raids involve coordinated efforts by multiple workers, as seen in species like the clonal raider ant Ooceraea biroi, where scouts lead small teams to overwhelm prey or harvest scattered resources.[132] Army ants, such as those in the genus Eciton, exhibit mass raiding, deploying thousands of workers in sweeping fronts to capture live prey during nomadic phases, an evolution from smaller group raids that correlates with expanded colony sizes exceeding 100,000 individuals.[133] Trophallaxis, the mouth-to-mouth exchange of liquid food, facilitates efficient distribution of foraged nutrients within the colony, allowing non-foragers like larvae to access resources indirectly.[134] A remarkable adaptation in the Neotropical tribe Attini, comprising approximately 250 species, is fungus farming, where ants cultivate symbiotic fungi as their primary food source. These ants, including leaf-cutter species like Atta and Acromyrmex, harvest fresh vegetation, particularly leaves, which they chew into a substrate inoculated with fungal mycelium from the genus Leucoagaricus, such as L. gongylophorus in advanced farmers.[135] The fungi break down the plant material into digestible gongylidia—swollen hyphal tips—that the ants consume, providing essential nutrients while the ants maintain the garden by weeding out contaminants and regulating humidity.[136] This mutualism originated approximately 66 million years ago in the ancestor of the Attini, during the aftermath of the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event, predating human agriculture and representing one of the earliest known instances of domestication in the natural world.[137] Many ant species engage in protective mutualisms with sap-feeding insects like aphids to access carbohydrate-rich honeydew. Ants herd aphids by transporting them to optimal feeding sites on plants, shielding them from predators such as ladybugs, and stimulating excretion through antennal tapping, which elicits droplets of honeydew that the ants collect and consume.[138] This "farming" behavior enhances aphid survival and reproduction while providing ants with a renewable, high-energy resource, often comprising a substantial portion of their liquid diet. Similarly, harvester ants in the genus Pogonomyrmex, prevalent in arid North American habitats, specialize in seed harvesting, with workers foraging up to 100 meters from the nest to collect seeds from grasses and forbs.[139] These ants select seeds based on size and nutritional value, discarding husks in middens and storing viable ones in granaries, where they serve as a protein- and lipid-rich staple that sustains colonies through seasonal scarcities.[140] Ants maintain an omnivorous diet, opportunistically consuming live and dead insects, floral nectar, scavenged organic matter, and fungi, which collectively fuel colony growth and maintenance. Foraging efficiency is critical, with models indicating that 50–90% of a colony's energy budget derives from these activities, underscoring the selective pressure for optimized search and retrieval behaviors.[141] This dietary flexibility allows ants to thrive across ecosystems, from deserts to rainforests, by balancing macronutrient intake through targeted collection.[142]

    Defense Strategies

    Ants utilize a diverse array of defense strategies to safeguard their colonies against predators, pathogens, and environmental threats, encompassing chemical, physical, and behavioral adaptations that enhance survival at both individual and collective levels. These mechanisms often integrate seamlessly, allowing ants to respond rapidly and effectively to danger. Chemical defenses form a cornerstone of ant protection, particularly through venom production and deployment. In the subfamily Formicinae, ants eject formic acid sprays from their venom apparatus, with concentrations reaching up to 70% volume/volume in species like Formica rufa, serving as both an irritant to deter attackers and an alarm signal to mobilize nestmates.[143] In contrast, many Myrmicinae species rely on alkaloid-rich venoms delivered via stings, which can include piperidine and pyridine derivatives that cause paralysis or tissue damage in intruders.[144] Sting mechanics in Myrmicinae vary significantly across genera; for instance, barbs on the aculeus in tribes like Pogonomyrmecini lodge into victims upon penetration, ensuring prolonged toxin delivery, while reversible stings in genera such as Solenopsis allow repeated attacks without loss of the apparatus.[145] Recent analyses of myrmicine venoms have revealed peptides with antimicrobial properties, such as linear cationic peptides functioning as antibiotics against bacterial pathogens, thereby protecting colonies from infection during raids or injuries.[146] Physical defenses emphasize morphological specializations, especially in polymorphic species with dedicated soldier castes. Soldiers in army ants like Dorylus (driver ants) possess enlarged mandibles adapted for crushing and slashing, enabling them to fend off vertebrates and arthropods during swarm raids.[147] These ants also demonstrate remarkable collective architecture; Dorylus workers interlock their bodies to form living bridges spanning gaps or obstacles, facilitating safe passage for the colony while exposing fewer individuals to risks and deterring potential attackers by presenting a unified front.[148] Behavioral strategies further amplify these protections through coordinated actions. Mass recruitment triggered by alarm pheromones, such as 4-methyl-3-heptanone in species like Iridomyrmex humilis, rapidly assembles large numbers of workers to overwhelm threats via swarming or venom bombardment.[149] In some cases, ants exhibit autotomy, where nestmates deliberately amputate infected limbs from injured workers using their mandibles, preventing sepsis from spreading to the colony and improving overall survival rates, as observed in Florida carpenter ants (Camponotus floridanus).[150] Mimicry complexes contribute to passive defense in certain myrmicine ants, where morphological and chemical resemblances to unpalatable beetles reduce predation pressure. For example, some Crematogaster species display body shapes and cuticular hydrocarbons that mimic those of toxic ground beetles, deterring predators in shared habitats.[151] This integration of defenses underscores the evolutionary sophistication of ant societies in maintaining colony integrity.

    Navigation and Learning

    Ants employ path integration as a primary cognitive mechanism for orientation, continuously updating an internal vector that tracks their position relative to the nest by integrating distance and direction during outbound journeys.[152] This process relies on an odometer system that measures traveled distance through step counts, as demonstrated in experiments where Cataglyphis ants manipulated with stilts or stumps altered their perceived outbound distance, leading to compensatory errors on return paths. For directional information, ants use celestial cues such as the sun's position and the pattern of polarized skylight, which serves as a reliable compass even under overcast conditions.[153] When displaced from their expected position, such as after capture during foraging, ants initiate systematic search patterns, starting with tight loops near the predicted nest location and progressively expanding into ever-larger spirals to locate familiar cues.[154] In addition to path integration, ants demonstrate landmark learning, storing visual snapshots of the environment to guide precise navigation. In Cataglyphis desert ants, visual memory enables the recognition and use of terrestrial landmarks, such as rocks or vegetation, to correct path integration errors and pinpoint nest entrances.[155] This learning provides a scaffold, where path integration initially orients the ant toward a goal area, allowing subsequent refinement via memorized landmarks. Pheromone augmentation enhances this process, as ants combine visual landmarks with olfactory cues from deposited pheromones to create multimodal navigational aids, improving accuracy in featureless terrains.[156] Associative learning further supports ant adaptation, allowing individuals to link sensory stimuli with rewards or punishments. In Camponotus ants, the maxilla-labium extension response (MaLER), analogous to the proboscis extension reflex in bees, can be conditioned by pairing odors with sucrose rewards, demonstrating olfactory associative learning after minimal trials.[157] Maze navigation experiments reveal the efficacy of this learning; for instance, Lasius niger ants trained in T-mazes achieve success rates of 65-81% in selecting rewarded arms after just one exposure, indicating rapid spatial association formation. Recent neuroimaging studies in the 2020s have illuminated the neural basis of these abilities, showing that enlarged mushroom bodies in forager ants correlate with enhanced route fidelity and visual memory storage. Lesion experiments confirm that mushroom body vertical lobes are essential for retrieving learned visual routes, as their ablation impairs navigation to remembered food sites while sparing innate responses to cues. In rare cases, such cognitive capacities extend to tool use, as observed in Aphaenogaster species that carry twigs or debris as implements to transport liquid food, optimizing foraging efficiency in competitive environments.[158]

    Social Structure and Interactions

    Ant societies exhibit a highly organized division of labor, primarily through age polyethism, where workers transition tasks based on their age. Young workers typically perform nursing duties inside the nest, such as caring for brood and the queen, while older workers shift to foraging and external defense activities.[159] This temporal specialization enhances colony efficiency by matching worker experience and physical condition to task demands.[160] Task allocation is further regulated by response thresholds, where individual workers vary in their sensitivity to environmental stimuli like pheromones or nest conditions, leading to probabilistic engagement in specific roles without central control.[161] Kin selection theory explains the evolution of altruism in ants, where workers forgo personal reproduction to raise relatives, maximizing inclusive fitness. Under haplodiploidy, the sex-determination system in Hymenoptera, sisters share 3/4 genetic relatedness due to identical alleles from the mother and half from the father, higher than the 1/2 relatedness to their own offspring.[162] This asymmetry favors workers investing in sisters (future queens and workers) over producing sons, promoting eusociality.[163] Intraspecific competition among ant colonies often involves aggressive interactions, including raids and territorial battles. Slave-making ants like Polyergus species conduct raids on Formica colonies, capturing brood to rear as slaves that perform colony labor. These raids escalate to combat, with raiders using chemical mimicry to infiltrate and subdue hosts.[164] Similarly, fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) engage in inter-colony wars, where larger colonies dominate through mass recruitment and sustained fighting, determining resource access and territory.[165] Queen-worker conflicts arise over reproductive allocation, particularly sex ratios, as queens favor equal investment in sons and daughters (1:1 ratio), while workers prefer biasing toward sisters (3:1 female:male). Workers manipulate this by selectively eliminating male eggs or larvae in colonies with singly mated queens, where worker relatedness asymmetry is strongest.[166] Policing behaviors enforce altruism, with workers destroying reproductive eggs laid by other workers to prevent selfish reproduction and maintain colony harmony, especially in multiply mated colonies where relatedness to nephews is lower.[97]

    Relationships with Other Organisms

    Mutualisms

    Ants engage in various mutualistic relationships with other organisms, where both parties derive benefits such as protection, nutrition, or habitat. These interactions often involve ants providing defense against herbivores or pathogens in exchange for food resources like nectar or secretions. Myrmecophily represents a prominent example, wherein ants protect plants from damage while receiving sustenance and shelter.[167] In myrmecophilous associations, certain plants have evolved specialized structures to attract and house ant colonies, fostering a protective symbiosis. A classic case is the relationship between swollen-thorn acacias (Acacia spp.) and Pseudomyrmex ants in Central American ecosystems. The ants inhabit the plant's hollow thorns and patrol its foliage, aggressively stinging and removing herbivores that attempt to feed on the leaves or stems. In return, the acacia provides the ants with nutrient-rich nectar from extrafloral nectaries and the thorns as secure nesting sites, enabling colony growth without the need for external foraging. This mutualism enhances plant survival by reducing herbivory by up to 90% in occupied trees, while the ants gain a reliable food source and protected habitat.[167][168] Another key mutualism involves ants and honeydew-producing hemipterans, such as aphids, where ants tend these insects for their carbohydrate-rich excretions. Azteca ants, for instance, associate with aphids like those in the genus Cinara on conifers, herding them to optimal feeding sites on plant phloem and excluding predators such as lady beetles or parasitoids. The ants consume the aphids' honeydew, a sugary byproduct of sap ingestion, which serves as a primary energy source for the colony. This tending behavior increases aphid populations and survival rates, while providing the ants with a steady, renewable food supply that can constitute over 90% of their liquid diet in some tropical systems. Evolutionary evidence suggests co-adaptation in these interactions, with some aphid lineages developing traits like reduced escape responses or specialized cuticular chemicals to attract specific ant species, indicating long-term selective pressures from mutualistic associations.[169][170][171] Leaf-cutter ants in the attine tribe (Attini) exemplify a complex tripartite mutualism involving fungi and antibiotic-producing bacteria. These ants cultivate fungus gardens as their primary food source, harvesting fresh vegetation to fertilize the symbiotic fungus (Leucoagaricus spp.), which breaks down plant material into digestible nutrients for the ants. To protect the garden from specialized fungal parasites like Escovopsis, the ants maintain mutualistic bacteria of the genus Pseudonocardia on their exoskeletons. These bacteria produce antifungal compounds, such as dentigerumycin, that selectively inhibit Escovopsis growth while sparing the cultivated fungus, ensuring garden stability. This layered symbiosis has persisted for over 50 million years, with genetic analyses revealing co-evolutionary congruence between ant lineages, their fungal cultivars, and bacterial symbionts.[172][173][174] Recent studies have illuminated genetic mechanisms underlying long-term ant-plant mutualisms, particularly how symbiont interactions influence host resilience. In defensive associations like those between ants and myrmecophytes, integrated omics approaches have detected horizontal gene transfers and altered gene expression profiles that enhance plant defenses, such as increased production of secondary metabolites or structural reinforcements against environmental stressors. For example, in tripartite systems involving ants, plants, and hemipterans, genetic exchanges between symbionts promote nutritional provisioning to the plant, bolstering its tolerance to drought or herbivory and stabilizing the mutualism across generations. These findings underscore how genetic integration in prolonged symbioses contributes to ecological resilience in changing climates.[175][176]

    Predation and Parasitism

    Ants exhibit diverse predatory behaviors, serving as significant predators in many ecosystems. Species in the genus Dorylus, commonly known as driver ants or army ants, form massive colonies that conduct coordinated raids, overwhelming and consuming vast quantities of prey. A single Dorylus colony, which can contain up to 20 million workers, may consume up to 500,000 prey items daily, primarily arthropods such as insects and earthworms, though larger vertebrates like small reptiles can also fall victim during swarm raids.[177] These nomadic predators fan out in broad fronts, using sheer numbers and aggressive tactics to subdue and dismember prey on the spot.[178] Other ants employ specialized mechanisms for predation, exemplified by trap-jaw ants in the genus Odontomachus. These ants possess mandibles that close at speeds exceeding 140 km/h, enabling them to strike and capture small insects with immense force, often impaling or crushing prey in milliseconds.[179] The trap-jaw strike not only facilitates hunting but also allows for rapid prey manipulation, such as flipping victims into position for transport back to the nest.[180] This ultrafast mechanism, powered by a latch and spring-like energy storage in the mandible muscles, underscores the evolutionary adaptations for efficient predation in ambush-oriented species.[181] Ants also engage in intra-guild predation, where they prey upon or aggressively displace other ant species, particularly in invasive contexts. The Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) exemplifies this through intense interspecific aggression, rapidly displacing native ant communities via direct attacks and colony raids that eliminate competitors.[182] In invaded habitats, L. humile populations can reduce native ant diversity by 3.5- to 24-fold, often incorporating elements of predation and scavenging within the same guild, altering local arthropod dynamics.[182] While ants are formidable predators, they are frequent targets of parasitism, which exploits their social structure. Social parasites like slave-making ants in the genus Harpagoxenus infiltrate host nests, primarily of Myrmica species, by mimicking host chemical cues to avoid detection.[183] Once inside, Harpagoxenus queens coerce host workers into retrieving and rearing the parasites' brood, effectively enslaving the colony to sustain the invaders; this dulosis has evolved multiple times within the Formicoxeninae subfamily.[184] Nematode parasites, such as those in the genus Myrmeconema, target the ant's gaster (abdomen), where females migrate post-mating to deposit eggs that develop within the host.[185] Infected ants exhibit altered morphology, with swollen, bright red gasters mimicking berries to attract bird dispersers, facilitating nematode transmission while compromising host mobility and survival.[186] Ants have evolved defenses against such predation and parasitism, including chemical allomones and behavioral nest hygiene. Allomones, such as antimicrobial alkaloids and formic acid secretions, deter parasites by disrupting invader integration or directly inhibiting pathogen growth in species like leaf-cutting ants (Atta and Acromyrmex).[187] Nest hygiene involves meticulous grooming and waste removal; workers use specialized structures like the infrabuccal pocket to filter and sterilize spores or pathogens, preventing fungal parasites like Escovopsis from spreading.[188] These proactive measures, including mutual grooming that reduces parasite loads on individuals, help maintain colony health. Recent studies indicate that high parasite loads can drastically reduce colony fitness, such as by lowering pupal eclosion rates and impairing overall reproductive output in infected populations.[189]

    Ecosystem Roles

    Ants play a pivotal role in soil aeration through extensive nest-building and foraging activities, which involve excavating and turning over large volumes of soil. In various ecosystems, ants are estimated to process up to 13 tons of soil per hectare per year, significantly improving soil structure, water infiltration, and oxygen availability.[190] This aeration enhances nutrient cycling by mixing organic matter with mineral soils, promoting microbial activity and the release of essential elements like nitrogen and phosphorus for plant uptake.[191] Additionally, through myrmecochory—the dispersal of seeds attached to lipid-rich elaiosomes—ants facilitate the propagation of approximately 20% of plant species in certain temperate and tropical forests, aiding in forest regeneration and plant community diversity.[192] In decomposition processes, ants act as efficient scavengers and predators, contributing to the breakdown of organic matter and the control of herbivorous pests. They account for scavenging roughly 10-20% of arthropod biomass in many terrestrial systems, accelerating the decomposition of dead insects and plant material, which recycles nutrients back into the soil.[193] In tropical rainforests, ants perform up to 61% of all invertebrate-mediated scavenging, underscoring their dominance in waste management and preventing nutrient lockup in undecayed biomass.[193] This predatory role helps regulate pest populations, indirectly supporting higher trophic levels and maintaining ecosystem balance. Ant species richness serves as a reliable indicator of habitat health and overall biodiversity, with higher diversity often correlating positively with ecosystem integrity and resilience.[194] In tropical ecosystems, ants function as keystone species, exerting disproportionate influence on community structure through predation, soil engineering, and mutualistic interactions that support thousands of associated species.[195] Their presence and abundance reflect environmental conditions, making them valuable for monitoring restoration success and disturbance impacts. Regarding climate impacts, ant nests can produce methane (CH₄) due to anaerobic conditions in organic-rich chambers, potentially contributing to greenhouse gas emissions in tropical soils.[196] However, their soil-turning activities also promote carbon sequestration by incorporating organic carbon deeper into profiles, enhancing long-term storage.[197] Recent ecological models suggest that warming temperatures may shift ant distributions and nest dynamics, altering these balances and potentially increasing methane fluxes while boosting decomposition rates in alpine and forest systems.[198]

    Interactions with Humans

    As Pests and Agricultural Impacts

    Ants can pose significant challenges as invasive pests in agricultural and urban settings, with certain species causing substantial economic and health-related damages. The red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta), introduced to the United States from South America in the late 1930s, has become one of the most notorious examples. These ants form aggressive colonies that sting livestock, particularly newborn calves and other vulnerable animals, leading to injuries, reduced weight gain, and increased mortality rates in the cattle industry. The overall economic impact of fire ants in the U.S. is estimated at over $6 billion annually, encompassing medical treatments for stings, agricultural losses, and control efforts.[199][200][201] In agriculture, leafcutter ants (Atta and Acromyrmex spp.) represent a major threat in Neotropical regions by harvesting foliage to cultivate fungal gardens, resulting in defoliation of up to 17% of leaf biomass in some ecosystems. This herbivory not only reduces crop yields in plantations like citrus, coffee, and sugarcane but also weakens native vegetation, exacerbating soil erosion and biodiversity loss. Carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.), meanwhile, damage wooden structures in agricultural buildings and homes by excavating galleries for nesting, potentially compromising structural integrity over time without consuming the wood itself. These activities contribute to repair costs and reduced productivity in farming operations.[202][203] Urban environments face issues from species like pharaoh ants (Monomorium pharaonis), which infest hospitals and food preparation areas, mechanically transmitting pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella spp. through their foraging trails. In healthcare settings, these ants have been documented contaminating wounds, intravenous lines, and sterile equipment, posing risks to immunocompromised patients. Effective control relies on targeted baiting strategies, including fipronil-based gels and stations that workers carry back to colonies, disrupting reproduction and achieving colony elimination within weeks, though non-repellent insecticides are preferred to avoid budding and reinfestation.[204][205] While some ant species offer offsetting benefits, such as predatory ants controlling termite populations in certain ecosystems, the net impact remains predominantly negative for human activities. Predatory ants can help control termite damage to crops and structures through direct hunting and interference. However, only a small fraction of the world's over 15,000 described ant species—fewer than a dozen major ones in regions like California—account for most pest problems, highlighting that invasive and synanthropic species drive the majority of conflicts despite occasional ecological services.[206][207]

    In Science and Technology

    Ants serve as important model organisms in biological research, particularly the fire ant Solenopsis invicta, which has been extensively studied for the genetic basis of eusociality. Researchers have identified a simple genetic locus, known as the social chromosome Sb, that determines colony social organization, including queen number and worker policing behaviors, providing insights into the evolution of cooperative societies.[208] This species' invasive nature and polymorphic social forms have facilitated genomic and transcriptomic analyses, revealing how gene regulation influences caste differentiation and reproductive altruism.[209] In technology, ant foraging behaviors have inspired algorithms like Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), introduced by Marco Dorigo in 1992, which simulates pheromone-based path finding to solve combinatorial optimization problems such as the traveling salesman problem. ACO has been applied to robot swarm coordination, enabling decentralized control in multi-agent systems for tasks like search and rescue. Biomimicry extends to ant physical traits; the high-speed mandible closure of trap-jaw ants (Odontomachus spp.), reaching velocities up to 64 m/s, has informed the design of jumping mechanisms in millirobots, allowing autonomous locomotion including flips and leaps over obstacles. Similarly, the adhesive structures on ant tarsi, including setose pads that enable reversible attachment to smooth surfaces, have contributed to early concepts in reusable tapes, paralleling gecko-inspired dry adhesives by demonstrating shear-force adhesion without residue.[210] Medically, ant venoms offer bioactive peptides with therapeutic potential; while poneratoxins from Paraponera clavata primarily induce intense pain by modulating voltage-gated sodium channels, broader ant venom research has identified peptides that could inspire non-opioid analgesics by targeting similar ion channels.01143-3) Studies of ant microbiomes using 2020s metagenomics have uncovered bacterial symbionts producing novel antibiotics, such as those from Pseudonocardia associated with fungus-farming ants, which inhibit pathogenic fungi and show activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria.[211] In neuroscience, ant learning circuits, particularly in the mushroom bodies, provide models for efficient AI systems; these compact neural structures enable route learning and visual navigation with minimal resources, inspiring spiking neural networks for robotic autonomy in complex environments.[212] By 2025, comparative analyses of 163 ant genomes have advanced understanding of neural gene evolution, highlighting expansions in odorant receptors and ion channels that underpin adaptive behaviors.[22]

    As Food and Cultural Significance

    Ants have been consumed by humans in various cultures, particularly through entomophagy, where they serve as a nutrient-rich food source. Honeypot ants of the genus Myrmecocystus, such as Myrmecocystus mexicanus, are harvested for their swollen abdomens filled with nectar, which indigenous communities in Mexico collect and use in food and traditional medicines.[213] In Australia, Aboriginal people regard honeypot ants like Camponotus inflatus as a delicacy, incorporating their honey-like contents into diets for their high sugar content and cultural significance.[214] In Mexican cuisine, winged ants known as chicatanas (Atta mexicana or related leafcutter species) are a seasonal delicacy, toasted and eaten whole or ground into salsas for their nutty, earthy flavor.[215] Unlike many ants that contain formic acid for a tangy, citrus-like taste used as a natural flavoring in some dishes, chicatanas notably lack this acid, offering instead a woody and fatty profile.[216][217] Ants hold prominent symbolic roles in mythology and folklore, often representing diligence and communal effort. In Aesop's fable "The Ant and the Grasshopper," the ant embodies industriousness by storing food for winter, contrasting the grasshopper's idleness and teaching lessons on foresight and hard work.[218] Biblical references in Christianity, such as Proverbs 6:6, urge observation of the ant's ways as a model of wisdom and preparation without direct oversight. In North African folklore, ants are credited with imparting essential knowledge to early humans, symbolizing ingenuity and cooperation in survival.[219] In art and popular media, ants frequently symbolize perseverance and social organization. Animated films like Antz (1998), which explores individuality within a conformist colony, and A Bug's Life (1998), highlighting inventive problem-solving among ants, have popularized these themes for broad audiences. Ant motifs in tattoos often represent endurance and teamwork, serving as personal emblems of overcoming adversity through collective strength.[220]

    As Pets and Conservation

    Ant-keeping as a hobby involves maintaining ant colonies in artificial habitats known as formicariums, which allow enthusiasts to observe social behaviors and colony development without environmental harm. The formicarium was first developed in the early 1900s by French entomologist Charles Janet, who designed transparent enclosures to study ant nest architecture in two dimensions. Commercial ant farms emerged in the 1930s, pioneered by Frank Austin in the United States, popularizing the hobby with kits featuring species like Camponotus carpenter ants, which are valued for their large size and visible foraging activities. In many regions, Lasius niger, the black garden ant, is a favored and legally permissible species for beginners due to its non-aggressive nature, ease of care, and adaptability to captive conditions.[221][222][223] Conservation efforts for ants have gained urgency, as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Species Survival Commission Ant Specialist Group continues to assess ant species, with a small number classified as threatened among the approximately 15,700 described ant species worldwide. A notable example is Adetomyrma venatrix, a critically endangered blind ant endemic to the forests of Madagascar, where its subterranean lifestyle makes it particularly vulnerable to disturbance. Major threats include habitat loss from deforestation and urbanization, which disrupts nesting sites and foraging grounds, as well as pesticide applications in agriculture that reduce ant populations by directly killing individuals and altering soil ecosystems. Invasive ant species exacerbate these risks; for instance, the yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) forms supercolonies that displace native ants and prey on bird populations, leading to declines in burrow-nesting seabirds on islands like those in the Seychelles and Hawaii.[224][225][226][227][228][229] In 2025, comparative analyses of 163 ant genomes by the Global Ant Genomics Alliance have enhanced understanding of evolutionary adaptations, supporting targeted conservation strategies.[22] In 2025, conservation initiatives emphasize protecting native ants through eradication of invasives and community involvement. Australia's Saving Native Species Program allocates funds to restore habitats for endemic ants, including efforts to control invasive species like the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), which threatens dominant natives such as meat ants (Iridomyrmex purpureus) by outcompeting them for resources. Citizen science plays a key role in monitoring, with projects like the School of Ants contributing specimen data to databases such as AntWeb, enabling widespread tracking of ant distributions and early detection of threats across urban and rural areas. These programs highlight the ecological importance of ants in soil aeration and seed dispersal, underscoring the need for integrated habitat protection strategies.[230][231][232][233]

    References

    1. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(06)01204-8
    2. https://antcat.org/
    3. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/invertebrates/facts/ants
    4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/formicidae
    5. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2201550119
    6. https://www.etymonline.com/word/ant
    7. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Formica
    8. https://www.etymonline.com/word/myrmidon
    9. https://bugguide.net/node/view/16569
    10. https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Formica
    11. https://www.spanish.academy/blog/zompopos-de-mayo-insect-and-food-of-latin-america/
    12. https://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/Researchtaxapages/Formicidaehome.html
    13. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Formicidae/
    14. https://academic.oup.com/isd/article/9/4/11/8248754
    15. https://www.antwiki.org/
    16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4982377/
    17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292612479_A_revised_phylogenetic_classification_of_the_ant_subfamily_Formicinae_Hymenoptera_Formicidae_with_resurrection_of_the_genera_Colobopsis_and_Dinomyrmex
    18. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/107506/
    19. https://www.sci.news/paleontology/vulcanidris-cratensis-13856.html
    20. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.157.3792.1038
    21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982224002410
    22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867425006178
    23. https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12983-020-00375-9
    24. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adp3623
    25. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2317795121
    26. https://resjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/syen.12513
    27. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-14-93
    28. https://littlefireants.com/wp-content/uploads/McGlynn-1999b-The-Worldwide-transfer_compressed.pdf
    29. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abp9908
    30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283026280_A_checklist_of_the_ants_Hymenoptera_Formicidae_of_Peru
    31. https://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=127
    32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31553213/
    33. https://antwiki.org/
    34. https://antwiki.org/wiki/Myrmicinae
    35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/formicinae
    36. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01221.x
    37. https://antwiki.org/wiki/Oecophylla
    38. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0869
    39. https://www.minibeastwildlife.com.au/resources/bull-ants/
    40. https://askabiologist.asu.edu/explore/ant-anatomy
    41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4792140/
    42. https://extension.umn.edu/insects-infest-homes/ants
    43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4429970/
    44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10577024/
    45. https://archive.cbts.edu/index.php/47f5Bp/897090/Anatomy-Of-An-Ant.pdf
    46. https://academic.oup.com/isd/article/6/2/2/6553779
    47. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jmor.70064
    48. https://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/Researchtaxapages/Formicidaepages/Glossary.ant.html
    49. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/66920/
    50. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84925-z
    51. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmor.21471
    52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3014722/
    53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8674293/
    54. https://jhr.pensoft.net/article/1649/
    55. https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/The_Ants_Chapter_7
    56. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/220/1/53/33443/Caste-development-and-evolution-in-ants-it-s-all
    57. https://www.rockefeller.edu/news/38067-how-ant-queens-are-made/
    58. https://www.molecularecologist.com/2020/04/24/everything-about-ant-reproductive-biology-is-bizarre/
    59. https://www.the-scientist.com/neuropeptides-control-labor-division-in-leafcutter-ants-73218
    60. https://www.fisherlab.org/uploads/3/9/4/4/39442661/128_peeters_fisher_2016.pdf
    61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016953470900367X
    62. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.08.519655v2.full.pdf
    63. https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/caryologia/article/view/172
    64. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-8-64
    65. https://www.apidologie.org/articles/apido/full_html/2009/05/m08094/m08094.html
    66. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adk9000
    67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982225011960
    68. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10709-021-00128-4
    69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC478579/
    70. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/first-ant-genomes-epigenetics/
    71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8002415/
    72. https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article/109/6/3080/547889/Ants-are-deaf
    73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4455814/
    74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8512044/
    75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43073212_Insect_Hygroreceptor_Responses_to_Continuous_Changes_in_Humidity_and_Air_Pressure
    76. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/behavioral-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00240/full
    77. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(20)31030-7
    78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982224017020
    79. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9317406/
    80. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/222/20/jeb198705/224418/High-speed-locomotion-in-the-Saharan-silver-ant
    81. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/224/18/jeb242842/272350/Allometry-in-desert-ant-locomotion-Cataglyphis
    82. https://labs.bio.unc.edu/hurlbert/pubs/Hurlbert%2C%2520Ballantyne%2520and%2520Powell%25202008.pdf
    83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4641605/
    84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC33448/
    85. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/207/1/67/14729/Biomechanics-of-ant-adhesive-pads-frictional
    86. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/192/1/107/6801/Stepping-Patterns-In-Ants-II-Influence-Of-Body
    87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3093451/
    88. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1177/26339137221123758
    89. https://polypedal.berkeley.edu/publications/027_Full_AnimalMotilityandGravity_Physiologist_1991.pdf
    90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4600169
    91. https://www.science.org/content/article/ant-queen-lays-eggs-hatch-two-species
    92. https://www.nature.com/articles/6882470
    93. https://sib.illinois.edu/news/2023-09-18/dont-be-alarmed-swarms-flying-ants
    94. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-29705-7
    95. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-05818-8
    96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11139587/
    97. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/508619
    98. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/284933
    99. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/380214
    100. https://www.bio.fsu.edu/~tschink/publications/1996-2.pdf
    101. https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/walker/ufbir/chapters/chapter_34.shtml
    102. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IG080
    103. https://www.pestsolutions.ca/what-do-ant-eggs-look-like-a-visual-guide-for-homeowners/
    104. https://www.rentokil.com/id/en/services/pest-control-services/ants/ant-life-cycle
    105. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jez.b.23278
    106. https://www.bio.fsu.edu/faculty/1995-1.pdf
    107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12313230/
    108. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-13-225
    109. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jez.b.23278
    110. https://askabiologist.asu.edu/individual-life-cycle
    111. https://www.insectlore.com/blogs/ants/life-cycle-of-a-harvester-ant
    112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3383432/
    113. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19707513/
    114. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/christian-peeters-and-bert-holldoblers-experiments-reproduction-indian-jumping-ants-1991-1994
    115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10512648/
    116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3352483/
    117. https://www.bio.fsu.edu/~tschink/publications/1993-3.pdf
    118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10015377/
    119. https://asknature.org/strategy/turrets-ventilate-nest/
    120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1689673/
    121. https://extension.usu.edu/planthealth/research/odorous-house-ant
    122. http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/eebedia/images/a/a0/Moffett.pdf
    123. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-animal-cognition/communication-in-ant-societies/87925A559AC5D1D9C641F75FB1A992E7
    124. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-10996-x
    125. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-19435-6
    126. https://resjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00658.x
    127. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-38947-y
    128. https://www.nature.com/articles/439153a
    129. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225812023_Combined_use_of_pheromone_trails_and_visual_landmarks_by_the_common_garden_ant_Lasius_niger
    130. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.13.580193v1
    131. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ethology/articles/10.3389/fetho.2024.1341120/full
    132. https://www.rockefeller.edu/news/30828-ant-colonies-get-bigger-new-foraging-behavior-emerges/
    133. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8179172/
    134. https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Group_Foraging
    135. https://imafungus.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s43008-023-00126-5
    136. https://repository.si.edu/bitstreams/ff8a20e4-b464-4345-9987-a90c612f9522/download
    137. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn7179
    138. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/did-you-know/farmer-ants-and-their-aphid-herds
    139. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0171419
    140. https://entomologytoday.org/2016/06/07/harvester-ants-have-a-taste-for-exotic-seeds/
    141. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00789.x
    142. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1175719/full
    143. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4728552/
    144. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232074208_Ant_Venoms_Chemical_and_Pharmacological_Properties
    145. https://www.antwiki.org/w/images/4/46/Kugler_1979c_Evolution_of_the_Sting_Apparatus_in_the_Myrmicine_Ants.pdf
    146. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9784689/
    147. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/dorylus
    148. https://twig.technology/blog/army-ant-bridge-building
    149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7762586/
    150. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982224006900
    151. https://myrmecologicalnews.org/cms/index.php?option=com_download&view=download&filename=volume35/mn35_201-210_printable.pdf&format=raw
    152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6462409/
    153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982207014017
    154. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/23/5/944/232205
    155. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982213008439
    156. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21430208/
    157. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19800887/
    158. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00040-022-00855-7
    159. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-81006-z
    160. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4917577/
    161. https://static.ias.edu/pitp/archive/2012files/18.pdf
    162. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/677283
    163. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3177639/
    164. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5052306/
    165. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11195475/
    166. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.092584299
    167. https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/20/3/249/6868278
    168. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.188.4191.936
    169. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2006.3701
    170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362754504_The_Evolution_and_Ecology_of_Interactions_Between_Ants_and_Honeydew-Producing_Hemipteran_Insects
    171. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32657007/
    172. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0904827106
    173. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.621041/full
    174. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3418327/
    175. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222015334
    176. https://resjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/een.70004
    177. https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Dorylus
    178. https://a-z-animals.com/blog/dorylus-ants/
    179. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0124871
    180. https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/scientists-reveal-how-these-ants-snap-their-jaws-shut-blink-eye
    181. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Trap-jaw-ants-control-the-explosive-release-of-stored-energy-through-a-combination-of_fig5_6864319
    182. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10530-006-9009-5
    183. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197897000252
    184. https://antwiki.org/wiki/images/9/91/Beibl%252C_J.%252C_Stuart%252C_R.J._et_al._2005._Six_origins_of_slavery_in_formicoxenine_ants_%252810.1007%2540s00040-005-0808-y%2529.pdf
    185. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2012/192017
    186. https://louisville.edu/biology/faculty/yanoviak/publication-archive/2008%2520Am%2520Nat.pdf
    187. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3609840/
    188. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982210005269
    189. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.22.683975v1
    190. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9546634/
    191. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3072065/
    192. https://eeb.utk.edu/ants-as-seed-dispersers/
    193. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.12728
    194. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X17300353
    195. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221011192
    196. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405621000482
    197. https://www.livescience.com/47151-ants-trap-carbon-weathering-minerals.html
    198. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9314018/
    199. https://tellus.ars.usda.gov/stories/articles/natural-enemies-close-fire-ants
    200. https://www.ars.usda.gov/oc/utm/fighting-a-ferocious-foe-ars-seeks-a-fire-ant-fix/
    201. https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/terrestrial/invertebrates/red-imported-fire-ant
    202. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/msystems.01307-20
    203. https://extension.umn.edu/insects-infest-homes/carpenter-ants
    204. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673672908690
    205. https://www.icup.org.uk/media/y0jpnwz3/icup500.pdf
    206. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/brv.12577
    207. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/home-and-landscape/ants/pest-notes/
    208. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003633
    209. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12378010/
    210. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/smll.202401859
    211. https://news.mcmaster.ca/the-ant-in-antibiotic-discovery-cameron-currie-amr/
    212. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.abl6334
    213. https://masaamerica.com/2021/05/12/edible-insects-hormiga-de-miel-honeypot-ants/
    214. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9000567/
    215. https://masienda.com/blogs/learn/chicatana-ants
    216. https://www.acs.org/pressroom/presspacs/2024/march/the-many-flavors-of-edible-ants.html
    217. https://antsauce.com/blogs/industry-news/gourmet-wild-mastering-the-art-of-ant-cuisine
    218. https://read.gov/aesop/052.html
    219. https://occult-world.com/ants-african-mythology/
    220. https://www.stylecraze.com/articles/ant-tattoo/
    221. https://antlantis.com/blogs/education/history-of-ant-keeping
    222. https://canada-ant-colony.com/blogs/articles/history-of-antkeeping
    223. https://www.antstore.net/shop/en/beliebte-arten-und-zubehoer/einstieg-lasius-niger/
    224. https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Conservation_status
    225. https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/2021-iucn-ssc-ant-sg-report_publication.pdf
    226. https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Adetomyrma_venatrix
    227. https://academic.oup.com/book/26117/chapter/194130078
    228. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320724003409
    229. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024151630204
    230. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/saving-native-species
    231. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/news/aba-argentine-ant-eradication-team
    232. https://australian.museum/learn/animals/insects/meat-ant/
    233. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/ES13-00364.1
    Add your contribution
    Related Hubs
    Hubbry - a platform of hubs to organize world’s information and connect people.Community hub content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; Personal hub content is available under Personal Hub Content License. Additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
    © 2026 Hubbry
    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
    Contact Hubbry
    Contribute something
    User Avatar
    No comments yet.