Hubbry Logo
EnzymeEnzymeMain
Open search
Enzyme
Community hub
Enzyme
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Enzyme
Enzyme
from Wikipedia

Ribbon diagram of glycosidase with an arrow showing the cleavage of the maltose sugar substrate into two glucose products.
The enzyme glucosidase converts the sugar maltose into two glucose sugars. Active site residues in red, maltose substrate in black, and NAD cofactor in yellow. (PDB: 1OBB​)

An enzyme is a biological macromolecule, usually a protein, that acts as a biological catalyst, accelerating chemical reactions without being consumed in the process. The molecules on which enzymes act are called substrates, which are converted into products. Nearly all metabolic processes within a cell depend on enzyme catalysis to occur at biologically relevant rates.[1]: 8.1  Metabolic pathways are typically composed of a series of enzyme-catalyzed steps. The study of enzymes is known as enzymology, and a related field focuses on pseudoenzymes—proteins that have lost catalytic activity but may retain regulatory or scaffolding functions, often indicated by alterations in their amino acid sequences or unusual 'pseudocatalytic' behavior.[2][3]

Enzymes are known to catalyze over 5,000 types of biochemical reactions.[4] Other biological catalysts include catalytic RNA molecules, or ribozymes, which are sometimes classified as enzymes despite being composed of RNA rather than protein. More recently, biomolecular condensates have been recognized as a third category of biocatalysts, capable of catalyzing reactions by creating interfaces and gradients—such as ionic gradients—that drive biochemical processes, even when their component proteins are not intrinsically catalytic.[5]

Enzymes increase the reaction rate by lowering a reaction's activation energy, often by factors of millions. A striking example is orotidine 5'-phosphate decarboxylase, which accelerates a reaction that would otherwise take millions of years to occur in milliseconds.[6][7] Like all catalysts, enzymes do not affect the overall equilibrium of a reaction and are regenerated at the end of each cycle. What distinguishes them is their high specificity, determined by their unique three-dimensional structure, and their sensitivity to factors such as temperature and pH. Enzyme activity can be enhanced by activators or diminished by inhibitors, many of which serve as drugs or poisons. Outside optimal conditions, enzymes may lose their structure through denaturation, leading to loss of function.

Enzymes have widespread practical applications. In industry, they are used to catalyze the production of antibiotics and other complex molecules. In everyday life, enzymes in biological washing powders break down protein, starch, and fat stains, enhancing cleaning performance. Papain and other proteolytic enzymes are used in meat tenderizers to hydrolyze proteins, improving texture and digestibility. Their specificity and efficiency make enzymes indispensable in both biological systems and commercial processes.

IUPAC definition for enzymes

Etymology and history

[edit]

By the late 17th and early 18th centuries, the digestion of meat by stomach secretions[8] and the conversion of starch to sugars by plant extracts and saliva were known but the mechanisms by which these occurred had not been identified.[9]

French chemist Anselme Payen was the first to discover an enzyme, diastase, in 1833.[10] A few decades later, when studying the fermentation of sugar to alcohol by yeast, Louis Pasteur concluded that this fermentation was caused by a vital force contained within the yeast cells called "ferments", which were thought to function only within living organisms. He wrote that "alcoholic fermentation is an act correlated with the life and organization of the yeast cells, not with the death or putrefaction of the cells."[11]

In 1877, German physiologist Wilhelm Kühne (1837–1900) first used the term enzyme, which comes from Ancient Greek ἔνζυμον (énzymon) 'leavened, in yeast', to describe this process.[12] The word enzyme was used later to refer to nonliving substances such as pepsin, and the word ferment was used to refer to chemical activity produced by living organisms.[13]

Photograph of Eduard Buchner.
Eduard Buchner

Eduard Buchner submitted his first paper on the study of yeast extracts in 1897. In a series of experiments at the University of Berlin, he found that sugar was fermented by yeast extracts even when there were no living yeast cells in the mixture.[14] He named the enzyme that brought about the fermentation of sucrose "zymase".[15] In 1907, he received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for "his discovery of cell-free fermentation". Following Buchner's example, enzymes are usually named according to the reaction they carry out: the suffix -ase is combined with the name of the substrate (e.g., lactase is the enzyme that cleaves lactose) or to the type of reaction (e.g., DNA polymerase forms DNA polymers).[16]

The biochemical identity of enzymes was still unknown in the early 1900s. Many scientists observed that enzymatic activity was associated with proteins, but others (such as Nobel laureate Richard Willstätter) argued that proteins were merely carriers for the true enzymes and that proteins per se were incapable of catalysis.[17] In 1926, James B. Sumner showed that the enzyme urease was a pure protein and crystallized it; he did likewise for the enzyme catalase in 1937. The conclusion that pure proteins can be enzymes was definitively demonstrated by John Howard Northrop and Wendell Meredith Stanley, who worked on the digestive enzymes pepsin (1930), trypsin and chymotrypsin. These three scientists were awarded the 1946 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.[18]

The discovery that enzymes could be crystallized eventually allowed their structures to be solved by x-ray crystallography. This was first done for lysozyme, an enzyme found in tears, saliva and egg whites that digests the coating of some bacteria; the structure was solved by a group led by David Chilton Phillips and published in 1965.[19] This high-resolution structure of lysozyme marked the beginning of the field of structural biology and the effort to understand how enzymes work at an atomic level of detail.[20]

Classification and nomenclature

[edit]

Enzymes can be classified by two main criteria: either amino acid sequence similarity (and thus evolutionary relationship) or enzymatic activity.

Enzyme activity. An enzyme's name is often derived from its substrate or the chemical reaction it catalyzes, with the word ending in -ase.[1]: 8.1.3  Examples are lactase, alcohol dehydrogenase and DNA polymerase. Different enzymes that catalyze the same chemical reaction are called isozymes.[1]: 10.3 

The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology have developed a nomenclature for enzymes, the EC numbers (for "Enzyme Commission"). Each enzyme is described by "EC" followed by a sequence of four numbers which represent the hierarchy of enzymatic activity (from very general to very specific). That is, the first number broadly classifies the enzyme based on its mechanism while the other digits add more and more specificity.[21]

The top-level classification is:

These sections are subdivided by other features such as the substrate, products, and chemical mechanism. An enzyme is fully specified by four numerical designations. For example, hexokinase (EC 2.7.1.1) is a transferase (EC 2) that adds a phosphate group (EC 2.7) to a hexose sugar, a molecule containing an alcohol group (EC 2.7.1).[22]

Sequence similarity. EC categories do not reflect sequence similarity. For instance, two ligases of the same EC number that catalyze exactly the same reaction can have completely different sequences. Independent of their function, enzymes, like any other proteins, have been classified by their sequence similarity into numerous families. These families have been documented in dozens of different protein and protein family databases such as Pfam.[23]

Non-homologous isofunctional enzymes. Unrelated enzymes that have the same enzymatic activity have been called non-homologous isofunctional enzymes.[24] Horizontal gene transfer may spread these genes to unrelated species, especially bacteria where they can replace endogenous genes of the same function, leading to hon-homologous gene displacement.

Structure

[edit]
A graph showing that reaction rate increases exponentially with temperature until denaturation causes it to decrease again.
Enzyme activity initially increases with temperature (Q10 coefficient) until the enzyme's structure unfolds (denaturation), leading to an optimal rate of reaction at an intermediate temperature.

Enzymes are generally globular proteins, acting alone or in larger complexes. The sequence of the amino acids specifies the structure which in turn determines the catalytic activity of the enzyme.[25] Although structure determines function, a novel enzymatic activity cannot yet be predicted from structure alone.[26] Enzyme structures unfold (denature) when heated or exposed to chemical denaturants and this disruption to the structure typically causes a loss of activity.[27] Enzyme denaturation is normally linked to temperatures above a species' normal level; as a result, enzymes from bacteria living in volcanic environments such as hot springs are prized by industrial users for their ability to function at high temperatures, allowing enzyme-catalysed reactions to be operated at a very high rate.

Enzymes are usually much larger than their substrates. Sizes range from just 62 amino acid residues, for the monomer of 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase,[28] to over 2,500 residues in the animal fatty acid synthase.[29] Only a small portion of their structure (around 2–4 amino acids) is directly involved in catalysis: the catalytic site.[30] This catalytic site is located next to one or more binding sites where residues orient the substrates. The catalytic site and binding site together compose the enzyme's active site. The remaining majority of the enzyme structure serves to maintain the precise orientation and dynamics of the active site.[31]

In some enzymes, no amino acids are directly involved in catalysis; instead, the enzyme contains sites to bind and orient catalytic cofactors.[31] Enzyme structures may also contain allosteric sites where the binding of a small molecule causes a conformational change that increases or decreases activity.[32]

A small number of RNA-based biological catalysts called ribozymes exist, which again can act alone or in complex with proteins. The most common of these is the ribosome which is a complex of protein and catalytic RNA components.[1]: 2.2 

Mechanism

[edit]
Lysozyme displayed as an opaque globular surface with a pronounced cleft which the substrate depicted as a stick diagram snuggly fits into.
Organisation of enzyme structure and lysozyme example. Binding sites in blue, catalytic site in red and peptidoglycan substrate in black. (PDB: 9LYZ​)

Substrate binding

[edit]

Enzymes must bind their substrates before they can catalyse any chemical reaction. Enzymes are usually very specific as to what substrates they bind and then the chemical reaction catalysed. Specificity is achieved by binding pockets with complementary shape, charge and hydrophilic/hydrophobic characteristics to the substrates. Enzymes can therefore distinguish between very similar substrate molecules to be chemoselective, regioselective and stereospecific.[33]

Some of the enzymes showing the highest specificity and accuracy are involved in the copying and expression of the genome. Some of these enzymes have "proof-reading" mechanisms. Here, an enzyme such as DNA polymerase catalyzes a reaction in a first step and then checks that the product is correct in a second step.[34] This two-step process results in average error rates of less than 1 error in 100 million reactions in high-fidelity mammalian polymerases.[1]: 5.3.1  Similar proofreading mechanisms are also found in RNA polymerase,[35] aminoacyl tRNA synthetases[36] and ribosomes.[37]

Conversely, some enzymes display enzyme promiscuity, having broad specificity and acting on a range of different physiologically relevant substrates. Many enzymes possess small side activities which arose fortuitously (i.e. neutrally), which may be the starting point for the evolutionary selection of a new function.[38][39]

Hexokinase displayed as an opaque surface with a pronounced open binding cleft next to unbound substrate (top) and the same enzyme with more closed cleft that surrounds the bound substrate (bottom)
Enzyme changes shape by induced fit upon substrate binding to form enzyme-substrate complex. Hexokinase has a large induced fit motion that closes over the substrates adenosine triphosphate and xylose. Binding sites in blue, substrates in black and Mg2+ cofactor in yellow. (PDB: 2E2N​, 2E2Q​)

"Lock and key" model

[edit]

To explain the observed specificity of enzymes, in 1894 Emil Fischer proposed that both the enzyme and the substrate possess specific complementary geometric shapes that fit exactly into one another.[40] This is often referred to as "the lock and key" model.[1]: 8.3.2  This early model explains enzyme specificity, but fails to explain the stabilization of the transition state that enzymes achieve.[41]

Induced fit model

[edit]

In 1958, Daniel Koshland suggested a modification to the lock and key model: since enzymes are rather flexible structures, the active site is continuously reshaped by interactions with the substrate as the substrate interacts with the enzyme.[42] As a result, the substrate does not simply bind to a rigid active site; the amino acid side-chains that make up the active site are molded into the precise positions that enable the enzyme to perform its catalytic function. In some cases, such as glycosidases, the substrate molecule also changes shape slightly as it enters the active site.[43] The active site continues to change until the substrate is completely bound, at which point the final shape and charge distribution is determined.[44] Induced fit may enhance the fidelity of molecular recognition in the presence of competition and noise via the conformational proofreading mechanism.[45]

Catalysis

[edit]

Enzymes can accelerate reactions in several ways, all of which lower the activation energy (ΔG, Gibbs free energy)[46]

  1. By stabilizing the transition state:
    • Creating an environment with a charge distribution complementary to that of the transition state to lower its energy[47]
  2. By providing an alternative reaction pathway:
    • Temporarily reacting with the substrate, forming a covalent intermediate to provide a lower energy transition state[48]
  3. By destabilizing the substrate ground state:
    • Distorting bound substrate(s) into their transition state form to reduce the energy required to reach the transition state[49]
    • By orienting the substrates into a productive arrangement to reduce the reaction entropy change[50] (the contribution of this mechanism to catalysis is relatively small)[51]

Enzymes may use several of these mechanisms simultaneously. For example, proteases such as trypsin perform covalent catalysis using a catalytic triad, stabilize charge build-up on the transition states using an oxyanion hole, complete hydrolysis using an oriented water substrate.[52]

Dynamics

[edit]

Enzymes are not rigid, static structures; instead they have complex internal dynamic motions – that is, movements of parts of the enzyme's structure such as individual amino acid residues, groups of residues forming a protein loop or unit of secondary structure, or even an entire protein domain. These motions give rise to a conformational ensemble of slightly different structures that interconvert with one another at equilibrium. Different states within this ensemble may be associated with different aspects of an enzyme's function. For example, different conformations of the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase are associated with the substrate binding, catalysis, cofactor release, and product release steps of the catalytic cycle,[53] consistent with catalytic resonance theory. The transitions between the different conformations during the catalytic cycle involve internal viscoelastic motion that is facilitated by high-strain regions where amino acids are rearranged.[54]

Substrate presentation

[edit]

Substrate presentation is a process where the enzyme is sequestered away from its substrate. Enzymes can be sequestered to the plasma membrane away from a substrate in the nucleus or cytosol.[55] Or within the membrane, an enzyme can be sequestered into lipid rafts away from its substrate in the disordered region. When the enzyme is released it mixes with its substrate. Alternatively, the enzyme can be sequestered near its substrate to activate the enzyme. For example, the enzyme can be soluble and upon activation bind to a lipid in the plasma membrane and then act upon molecules in the plasma membrane.[56]

Allosteric modulation

[edit]

Allosteric sites are pockets on the enzyme, distinct from the active site, that bind to molecules in the cellular environment. These molecules then cause a change in the conformation or dynamics of the enzyme that is transduced to the active site and thus affects the reaction rate of the enzyme.[57] In this way, allosteric interactions can either inhibit or activate enzymes. Allosteric interactions with metabolites upstream or downstream in an enzyme's metabolic pathway cause feedback regulation, altering the activity of the enzyme according to the flux through the rest of the pathway.[58]

Cofactors

[edit]
Thiamine pyrophosphate displayed as an opaque globular surface with an open binding cleft where the substrate and cofactor both depicted as stick diagrams fit into.
Chemical structure for thiamine pyrophosphate and protein structure of transketolase. Thiamine pyrophosphate cofactor in yellow and xylulose 5-phosphate substrate in black. (PDB: 4KXV​)

Some enzymes do not need additional components to show full activity. Others require non-protein molecules called cofactors to be bound for activity.[59] Cofactors can be either inorganic (e.g., metal ions and iron–sulfur clusters) or organic compounds (e.g., flavin and heme). These cofactors serve many purposes; for instance, metal ions can help in stabilizing nucleophilic species within the active site.[60] Organic cofactors can be either coenzymes, which are released from the enzyme's active site during the reaction, or prosthetic groups, which are tightly bound to an enzyme. Organic prosthetic groups can be covalently bound (e.g., biotin in enzymes such as pyruvate carboxylase).[61]

An example of an enzyme that contains a cofactor is carbonic anhydrase, which uses a zinc cofactor bound as part of its active site.[62] These tightly bound ions or molecules are usually found in the active site and are involved in catalysis.[1]: 8.1.1  For example, flavin and heme cofactors are often involved in redox reactions.[1]: 17 

Enzymes that require a cofactor but do not have one bound are called apoenzymes or apoproteins. An enzyme together with the cofactor(s) required for activity is called a holoenzyme (or haloenzyme). The term holoenzyme can also be applied to enzymes that contain multiple protein subunits, such as the DNA polymerases; here the holoenzyme is the complete complex containing all the subunits needed for activity.[1]: 8.1.1 

Coenzymes

[edit]

Coenzymes are small organic molecules that can be loosely or tightly bound to an enzyme. Coenzymes transport chemical groups from one enzyme to another.[63] Examples include NADH, NADPH and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Some coenzymes, such as flavin mononucleotide (FMN), flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), and tetrahydrofolate (THF), are derived from vitamins. These coenzymes cannot be synthesized by the body de novo and closely related compounds (vitamins) must be acquired from the diet. The chemical groups carried include:

Since coenzymes are chemically changed as a consequence of enzyme action, it is useful to consider coenzymes to be a special class of substrates, or second substrates, which are common to many different enzymes. For example, about 1000 enzymes are known to use the coenzyme NADH.[64]

Coenzymes are usually continuously regenerated and their concentrations maintained at a steady level inside the cell. For example, NADPH is regenerated through the pentose phosphate pathway and S-adenosylmethionine by methionine adenosyltransferase. This continuous regeneration means that small amounts of coenzymes can be used very intensively. For example, the human body turns over its own weight in ATP each day.[65]

Thermodynamics

[edit]
A two dimensional plot of reaction coordinate (x-axis) vs. energy (y-axis) for catalyzed and uncatalyzed reactions. The energy of the system steadily increases from reactants (x = 0) until a maximum is reached at the transition state (x = 0.5), and steadily decreases to the products (x = 1). However, in an enzyme catalysed reaction, binding generates an enzyme-substrate complex (with slightly reduced energy) then increases up to a transition state with a smaller maximum than the uncatalysed reaction.
The energies of the stages of a chemical reaction. Uncatalysed (dashed line), substrates need a lot of activation energy to reach a transition state, which then decays into lower-energy products. When enzyme catalysed (solid line), the enzyme binds the substrates (ES), then stabilizes the transition state (ES) to reduce the activation energy required to produce products (EP) which are finally released.

As with all catalysts, enzymes do not alter the position of the chemical equilibrium of the reaction. In the presence of an enzyme, the reaction runs in the same direction as it would without the enzyme, just more quickly.[1]: 8.2.3  For example, carbonic anhydrase catalyzes its reaction in either direction depending on the concentration of its reactants:[66]

The rate of a reaction is dependent on the activation energy needed to form the transition state which then decays into products. Enzymes increase reaction rates by lowering the energy of the transition state. First, binding forms a low energy enzyme-substrate complex (ES). Second, the enzyme stabilises the transition state such that it requires less energy to achieve compared to the uncatalyzed reaction (ES). Finally the enzyme-product complex (EP) dissociates to release the products.[1]: 8.3 

Enzymes can couple two or more reactions, so that a thermodynamically favorable reaction can be used to "drive" a thermodynamically unfavourable one so that the combined energy of the products is lower than the substrates. For example, the hydrolysis of ATP is often used to drive other chemical reactions.[67]

Kinetics

[edit]
Schematic reaction diagrams for uncatalzyed (Substrate to Product) and catalyzed (Enzyme + Substrate to Enzyme/Substrate complex to Enzyme + Product)
A chemical reaction mechanism with or without enzyme catalysis. The enzyme (E) binds substrate (S) to produce product (P).
A two dimensional plot of substrate concentration (x axis) vs. reaction rate (y axis). The shape of the curve is hyperbolic. The rate of the reaction is zero at zero concentration of substrate and the rate asymptotically reaches a maximum at high substrate concentration.
Saturation curve for an enzyme reaction showing the relation between the substrate concentration and reaction rate.

Enzyme kinetics is the investigation of how enzymes bind substrates and turn them into products.[68] The rate data used in kinetic analyses are commonly obtained from enzyme assays. In 1913 Leonor Michaelis and Maud Leonora Menten proposed a quantitative theory of enzyme kinetics, which is referred to as Michaelis–Menten kinetics.[69] The major contribution of Michaelis and Menten was to think of enzyme reactions in two stages. In the first, the substrate binds reversibly to the enzyme, forming the enzyme-substrate complex. This is sometimes called the Michaelis–Menten complex in their honor. The enzyme then catalyzes the chemical step in the reaction and releases the product. This work was further developed by G. E. Briggs and J. B. S. Haldane, who derived kinetic equations that are still widely used today.[70]

Enzyme rates depend on solution conditions and substrate concentration. To find the maximum speed of an enzymatic reaction, the substrate concentration is increased until a constant rate of product formation is seen. This is shown in the saturation curve on the right. Saturation happens because, as substrate concentration increases, more and more of the free enzyme is converted into the substrate-bound ES complex. At the maximum reaction rate (Vmax) of the enzyme, all the enzyme active sites are bound to substrate, and the amount of ES complex is the same as the total amount of enzyme.[1]: 8.4 

Vmax is only one of several important kinetic parameters. The amount of substrate needed to achieve a given rate of reaction is also important. This is given by the Michaelis–Menten constant (Km), which is the substrate concentration required for an enzyme to reach one-half its maximum reaction rate; generally, each enzyme has a characteristic KM for a given substrate. Another useful constant is kcat, also called the turnover number, which is the number of substrate molecules handled by one active site per second.[1]: 8.4 

The efficiency of an enzyme can be expressed in terms of kcat/Km. This is also called the specificity constant and incorporates the rate constants for all steps in the reaction up to and including the first irreversible step. Because the specificity constant reflects both affinity and catalytic ability, it is useful for comparing different enzymes against each other, or the same enzyme with different substrates. The theoretical maximum for the specificity constant is called the diffusion limit and is about 108 to 109 (M−1 s−1). At this point every collision of the enzyme with its substrate will result in catalysis, and the rate of product formation is not limited by the reaction rate but by the diffusion rate. Enzymes with this property are called catalytically perfect or kinetically perfect. Example of such enzymes are triose-phosphate isomerase, carbonic anhydrase, acetylcholinesterase, catalase, fumarase, β-lactamase, and superoxide dismutase.[1]: 8.4.2  The turnover of such enzymes can reach several million reactions per second.[1]: 9.2  But most enzymes are far from perfect: the average values of and are about and , respectively.[71]

Michaelis–Menten kinetics relies on the law of mass action, which is derived from the assumptions of free diffusion and thermodynamically driven random collision. Many biochemical or cellular processes deviate significantly from these conditions, because of macromolecular crowding and constrained molecular movement.[72] More recent, complex extensions of the model attempt to correct for these effects.[73]

Inhibition

[edit]
Two dimensional representations of the chemical structure of folic acid and methotrexate highlighting the differences between these two substances (amidation of pyrimidone and methylation of secondary amine).
The coenzyme folic acid (left) and the anti-cancer drug methotrexate (right) are very similar in structure (differences show in green). As a result, methotrexate is a competitive inhibitor of many enzymes that use folates.

Enzyme reaction rates can be decreased by various types of enzyme inhibitors.[74]: 73–74 

Types of inhibition

[edit]

Competitive

[edit]

A competitive inhibitor and substrate cannot bind to the enzyme at the same time.[75] Often competitive inhibitors strongly resemble the real substrate of the enzyme. For example, the drug methotrexate is a competitive inhibitor of the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase, which catalyzes the reduction of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate.[76] The similarity between the structures of dihydrofolate and this drug are shown in the accompanying figure. This type of inhibition can be overcome with high substrate concentration. In some cases, the inhibitor can bind to a site other than the binding-site of the usual substrate and exert an allosteric effect to change the shape of the usual binding-site.[77]

Non-competitive

[edit]

A non-competitive inhibitor binds to a site other than where the substrate binds. The substrate still binds with its usual affinity and hence Km remains the same. However the inhibitor reduces the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme so that Vmax is reduced. In contrast to competitive inhibition, non-competitive inhibition cannot be overcome with high substrate concentration.[74]: 76–78 

Uncompetitive

[edit]

An uncompetitive inhibitor cannot bind to the free enzyme, only to the enzyme-substrate complex; hence, these types of inhibitors are most effective at high substrate concentration. In the presence of the inhibitor, the enzyme-substrate complex is inactive.[74]: 78  This type of inhibition is rare.[78]

Mixed

[edit]

A mixed inhibitor binds to an allosteric site and the binding of the substrate and the inhibitor affect each other. The enzyme's function is reduced but not eliminated when bound to the inhibitor. This type of inhibitor does not follow the Michaelis–Menten equation.[74]: 76–78 

Irreversible

[edit]

An irreversible inhibitor permanently inactivates the enzyme, usually by forming a covalent bond to the protein.[79] Penicillin[80] and aspirin[81] are common drugs that act in this manner.

Functions of inhibitors

[edit]

In many organisms, inhibitors may act as part of a feedback mechanism. If an enzyme produces too much of one substance in the organism, that substance may act as an inhibitor for the enzyme at the beginning of the pathway that produces it, causing production of the substance to slow down or stop when there is sufficient amount. This is a form of negative feedback. Major metabolic pathways such as the citric acid cycle make use of this mechanism.[1]: 17.2.2 

Since inhibitors modulate the function of enzymes they are often used as drugs. Many such drugs are reversible competitive inhibitors that resemble the enzyme's native substrate, similar to methotrexate above; other well-known examples include statins used to treat high cholesterol,[82] and protease inhibitors used to treat retroviral infections such as HIV.[83] A common example of an irreversible inhibitor that is used as a drug is aspirin, which inhibits the COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes that produce the inflammation messenger prostaglandin.[81] Other enzyme inhibitors are poisons. For example, the poison cyanide is an irreversible enzyme inhibitor that combines with the copper and iron in the active site of the enzyme cytochrome c oxidase and blocks cellular respiration.[84]

Factors affecting enzyme activity

[edit]

As enzymes are made up of proteins, their actions are sensitive to change in many physio chemical factors such as pH, temperature, substrate concentration, etc.

The following table shows pH optima for various enzymes.[85]

Enzyme Optimum pH pH description
Pepsin 1.5–1.6 Highly acidic
Invertase 4.5 Acidic
Lipase (stomach) 4.0–5.0 Acidic
Lipase (castor oil) 4.7 Acidic
Lipase (pancreas) 8.0 Alkaline
Amylase (malt) 4.6–5.2 Acidic
Amylase (pancreas) 6.7–7.0 Acidic-neutral
Cellobiase 5.0 Acidic
Maltase 6.1–6.8 Acidic
Sucrase 6.2 Acidic
Catalase 7.0 Neutral
Urease 7.0 Neutral
Cholinesterase 7.0 Neutral
Ribonuclease 7.0–7.5 Neutral
Fumarase 7.8 Alkaline
Trypsin 7.8–8.7 Alkaline
Adenosine triphosphate 9.0 Alkaline
Arginase 10.0 Highly alkaline

Biological function

[edit]

Enzymes serve a wide variety of functions inside living organisms. They are indispensable for signal transduction and cell regulation, often via kinases and phosphatases.[86] They also generate movement, with myosin hydrolyzing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to generate muscle contraction, and also transport cargo around the cell as part of the cytoskeleton.[87] Other ATPases in the cell membrane are ion pumps involved in active transport. Enzymes are also involved in more exotic functions, such as luciferase generating light in fireflies.[88] Viruses can also contain enzymes for infecting cells, such as the HIV integrase and reverse transcriptase, or for viral release from cells, like the influenza virus neuraminidase.[89]

An important function of enzymes is in the digestive systems of animals. Enzymes such as amylases and proteases break down large molecules (starch or proteins, respectively) into smaller ones, so they can be absorbed by the intestines. Starch molecules, for example, are too large to be absorbed from the intestine, but enzymes hydrolyze the starch chains into smaller molecules such as maltose and eventually glucose, which can then be absorbed. Different enzymes digest different food substances. In ruminants, which have herbivorous diets, microorganisms in the gut produce another enzyme, cellulase, to break down the cellulose cell walls of plant fiber.[90]

Metabolism

[edit]
Schematic diagram of the glycolytic metabolic pathway starting with glucose and ending with pyruvate via several intermediate chemicals. Each step in the pathway is catalyzed by a unique enzyme.
The metabolic pathway of glycolysis releases energy by converting glucose to pyruvate via a series of intermediate metabolites. Each chemical modification (red box) is performed by a different enzyme.

Several enzymes can work together in a specific order, creating metabolic pathways.[1]: 30.1  In a metabolic pathway, one enzyme takes the product of another enzyme as a substrate. After the catalytic reaction, the product is then passed on to another enzyme. Sometimes more than one enzyme can catalyze the same reaction in parallel; this can allow more complex regulation: with, for example, a low constant activity provided by one enzyme but an inducible high activity from a second enzyme.[91]

Enzymes determine what steps occur in these pathways. Without enzymes, metabolism would neither progress through the same steps and could not be regulated to serve the needs of the cell. Most central metabolic pathways are regulated at a few steps, typically through enzymes whose activity involves the phosphorylation by ATP. Because this reaction releases so much energy, other reactions that are thermodynamically unfavorable can be coupled to ATP hydrolysis, driving the overall series of linked metabolic reactions.[1]: 30.1 

Control of activity

[edit]

There are five main ways that enzyme activity is controlled in the cell.[1]: 30.1.1 

Regulation

[edit]

Enzymes can be either activated or inhibited by other molecules. For example, the end product(s) of a metabolic pathway are often inhibitors for one of the first enzymes of the pathway (usually the first irreversible step, called committed step), thus regulating the amount of end product made by the pathways. Such a regulatory mechanism is called a negative feedback mechanism, because the amount of the end product produced is regulated by its own concentration.[92]: 141–48  Negative feedback mechanism can effectively adjust the rate of synthesis of intermediate metabolites according to the demands of the cells. This helps with effective allocations of materials and energy economy, and it prevents the excess manufacture of end products. Like other homeostatic devices, the control of enzymatic action helps to maintain a stable internal environment in living organisms.[92]: 141 

Post-translational modification

[edit]

Examples of post-translational modification include phosphorylation, myristoylation and glycosylation.[92]: 149–69  For example, in the response to insulin, the phosphorylation of multiple enzymes, including glycogen synthase, helps control the synthesis or degradation of glycogen and allows the cell to respond to changes in blood sugar.[93] Another example of post-translational modification is the cleavage of the polypeptide chain. Chymotrypsin, a digestive protease, is produced in inactive form as chymotrypsinogen in the pancreas and transported in this form to the stomach where it is activated. This stops the enzyme from digesting the pancreas or other tissues before it enters the gut. This type of inactive precursor to an enzyme is known as a zymogen[92]: 149–53  or proenzyme.

Quantity

[edit]

Enzyme production (transcription and translation of enzyme genes) can be enhanced or diminished by a cell in response to changes in the cell's environment. This form of gene regulation is called enzyme induction. For example, bacteria may become resistant to antibiotics such as penicillin because enzymes called beta-lactamases are induced that hydrolyse the crucial beta-lactam ring within the penicillin molecule.[94] Another example comes from enzymes in the liver called cytochrome P450 oxidases, which are important in drug metabolism. Induction or inhibition of these enzymes can cause drug interactions.[95] Enzyme levels can also be regulated by changing the rate of enzyme degradation.[1]: 30.1.1  The opposite of enzyme induction is enzyme repression.

Subcellular distribution

[edit]

Enzymes can be compartmentalized, with different metabolic pathways occurring in different cellular compartments. For example, fatty acids are synthesized by one set of enzymes in the cytosol, endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi and used by a different set of enzymes as a source of energy in the mitochondrion, through β-oxidation.[96] In addition, trafficking of the enzyme to different compartments may change the degree of protonation (e.g., the neutral cytoplasm and the acidic lysosome) or oxidative state (e.g., oxidizing periplasm or reducing cytoplasm) which in turn affects enzyme activity.[97] In contrast to partitioning into membrane bound organelles, enzyme subcellular localisation may also be altered through polymerisation of enzymes into macromolecular cytoplasmic filaments.[98][99]

Organ specialization

[edit]

In multicellular eukaryotes, cells in different organs and tissues have different patterns of gene expression and therefore have different sets of enzymes (known as isozymes) available for metabolic reactions. This provides a mechanism for regulating the overall metabolism of the organism. For example, hexokinase, the first enzyme in the glycolysis pathway, has a specialized form called glucokinase expressed in the liver and pancreas that has a lower affinity for glucose yet is more sensitive to glucose concentration.[100] This enzyme is involved in sensing blood sugar and regulating insulin production.[101]

Involvement in disease

[edit]
Ribbon diagram of phenylalanine hydroxylase with bound cofactor, coenzyme and substrate
In phenylalanine hydroxylase over 300 different mutations throughout the structure cause phenylketonuria. Phenylalanine substrate and tetrahydrobiopterin coenzyme in black, and Fe2+ cofactor in yellow. (PDB: 1KW0​)
Hereditary defects in enzymes are generally inherited in an autosomal fashion because there are more non-X chromosomes than X-chromosomes, and a recessive fashion because the enzymes from the unaffected genes are generally sufficient to prevent symptoms in carriers.

Since the tight control of enzyme activity is essential for homeostasis, any malfunction (mutation, overproduction, underproduction or deletion) of a single critical enzyme can lead to a genetic disease. The malfunction of just one type of enzyme out of the thousands of types present in the human body can be fatal. An example of a fatal genetic disease due to enzyme insufficiency is Tay–Sachs disease, in which patients lack the enzyme hexosaminidase.[102][103]

One example of enzyme deficiency is the most common type of phenylketonuria. Many different single amino acid mutations in the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase, which catalyzes the first step in the degradation of phenylalanine, result in build-up of phenylalanine and related products. Some mutations are in the active site, directly disrupting binding and catalysis, but many are far from the active site and reduce activity by destabilising the protein structure, or affecting correct oligomerisation.[104][105] This can lead to intellectual disability if the disease is untreated.[106] Another example is pseudocholinesterase deficiency, in which the body's ability to break down choline ester drugs is impaired.[107] Oral administration of enzymes can be used to treat some functional enzyme deficiencies, such as pancreatic insufficiency[108] and lactose intolerance.[109]

Another way enzyme malfunctions can cause disease comes from germline mutations in genes coding for DNA repair enzymes. Defects in these enzymes cause cancer because cells are less able to repair mutations in their genomes. This causes a slow accumulation of mutations and results in the development of cancers. An example of such a hereditary cancer syndrome is xeroderma pigmentosum, which causes the development of skin cancers in response to even minimal exposure to ultraviolet light.[110][111]

Evolution

[edit]

Similar to any other protein, enzymes change over time through mutations and sequence divergence. Given their central role in metabolism, enzyme evolution plays a critical role in adaptation. A key question is therefore whether and how enzymes can change their enzymatic activities alongside. It is generally accepted that many new enzyme activities have evolved through gene duplication and mutation of the duplicate copies although evolution can also happen without duplication. One example of an enzyme that has changed its activity is the ancestor of methionyl aminopeptidase (MAP) and creatine amidinohydrolase (creatinase) which are clearly homologous but catalyze very different reactions (MAP removes the amino-terminal methionine in new proteins while creatinase hydrolyses creatine to sarcosine and urea). In addition, MAP is metal-ion dependent while creatinase is not, hence this property was also lost over time.[112] Small changes of enzymatic activity are extremely common among enzymes. In particular, substrate binding specificity (see above) can easily and quickly change with single amino acid changes in their substrate binding pockets. This is frequently seen in the main enzyme classes such as kinases.[113]

Artificial (in vitro) evolution is now commonly used to modify enzyme activity or specificity for industrial applications (see below).

Industrial applications

[edit]

Enzymes are used in the chemical industry and other industrial applications when extremely specific catalysts are required. Enzymes in general are limited in the number of reactions they have evolved to catalyze and also by their lack of stability in organic solvents and at high temperatures. As a consequence, protein engineering is an active area of research and involves attempts to create new enzymes with novel properties, either through rational design or in vitro evolution.[114][115] These efforts have begun to be successful, and a few enzymes have now been designed "from scratch" to catalyze reactions that do not occur in nature.[116]

Application Enzymes used Uses
Biofuel industry Cellulases Break down cellulose into sugars that can be fermented to produce cellulosic ethanol.[117]
Ligninases Pretreatment of biomass for biofuel production.[117]
Biological detergent Proteases, amylases, lipases Remove protein, starch, and fat or oil stains from laundry and dishware.[118]
Mannanases Remove food stains from the common food additive guar gum.[118]
Brewing industry Amylase, glucanases, proteases Split polysaccharides and proteins in the malt.[119]: 150–9 
Betaglucanases Improve the wort and beer filtration characteristics.[119]: 545 
Amyloglucosidase and pullulanases Make low-calorie beer and adjust fermentability.[119]: 575 
Acetolactate decarboxylase (ALDC) Increase fermentation efficiency by reducing diacetyl formation.[120]
Culinary uses Papain Tenderize meat for cooking.[121]
Dairy industry Rennin Hydrolyze protein in the manufacture of cheese.[122]
Lipases Produce Camembert cheese and blue cheeses such as Roquefort.[123]
Food processing Amylases Produce sugars from starch, such as in making high-fructose corn syrup.[124]
Proteases Lower the protein level of flour, as in biscuit-making.[125]
Trypsin Manufacture hypoallergenic baby foods.[125]
Cellulases, pectinases Clarify fruit juices.[126]
Molecular biology Nucleases, DNA ligase and polymerases Use restriction digestion and the polymerase chain reaction to create recombinant DNA.[1]: 6.2 
Paper industry Xylanases, hemicellulases and lignin peroxidases Remove lignin from kraft pulp.[127]
Personal care Proteases Remove proteins on contact lenses to prevent infections.[128]
Starch industry Amylases Convert starch into glucose and various syrups.[129]

See also

[edit]

Enzyme databases

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Enzymes are biological catalysts, primarily proteins but also including molecules known as ribozymes, that accelerate the rate of chemical reactions in living organisms by lowering the required for those reactions without being consumed or permanently altered in the process. These macromolecules possess a complex three-dimensional structure, consisting of one or more polypeptide chains folded into specific shapes, with an —a specialized region that binds to substrate molecules to form an enzyme-substrate complex and facilitate . The binding mechanism often follows the lock-and-key model, where the active site precisely matches the substrate, or the more dynamic induced fit model, in which the enzyme adjusts its conformation upon substrate binding to optimize the reaction. Enzymes operate under physiological conditions, enabling reactions to occur at rates compatible with life, and their activity is influenced by factors such as temperature, pH, and the presence of cofactors or inhibitors. Enzymes are systematically classified by the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and (IUBMB) into six major classes based on the type of reaction they catalyze: oxidoreductases (EC 1, electron transfer), transferases (EC 2, group transfer), hydrolases (EC 3, hydrolysis), lyases (EC 4, addition or removal of groups to form double bonds), isomerases (EC 5, isomerization), and ligases (EC 6, bond formation coupled to ). Each enzyme is assigned a unique EC number (e.g., EC 1.1.1.1 for ) for precise identification, and most are named with the suffix "-ase" to indicate their catalytic function, such as amylase for . The discovery of enzymes traces back to the , with the term "enzyme" coined by Wilhelm Kühne in 1877 to describe non-cellular catalysts, building on earlier observations like Anselme Payen's isolation of in 1833; the field advanced dramatically in the 1980s with the identification of ribozymes by and , earning them the 1989 . In biological systems, enzymes are indispensable, with thousands present in cells to regulate , , , and other processes essential for sustaining life. Their specificity and efficiency underpin applications, from industrial production to medical diagnostics, highlighting their profound impact across disciplines.

Etymology and History

Etymology

The term "enzyme" originates from the Greek phrase en zymē, meaning "in " or "in leaven," and was coined in 1877 by German physiologist Wilhelm Kühne to describe the active agents responsible for processes observed in . This nomenclature reflected the era's focus on as a primary model for studying catalytic activity in biological systems, distinguishing these agents from the broader category of ferments. In the early 19th century, before the adoption of "enzyme," such catalytic substances were commonly termed "ferments," a concept advanced by chemists including , who interpreted as a purely rather than a process tied exclusively to living organisms. Liebig and contemporaries like used "ferment" to encompass both living and non-living agents that accelerated reactions, though debates persisted over whether these were vital forces or chemical catalysts. By the mid-19th century, ferments were often subdivided into "organized ferments," which were believed to require intact living cells (such as ), and "unorganized ferments," which were thought to act independently. This distinction shifted dramatically in 1897 when Eduard Buchner demonstrated that cell-free extracts could still perform alcoholic , proving that the active principles—now termed enzymes—were soluble substances extractable from cells, independent of vital life processes. Buchner's discovery solidified "enzyme" as the preferred term for these non-cellular catalysts, marking a terminological from organism-bound ferments to biochemical entities.

Historical Development

The recognition of enzymatic processes dates back to ancient civilizations, with the earliest known fermented beverages dating to around 7000 BCE in at the site. Fermentation was subsequently utilized in regions such as and by approximately 4000 BCE for food and beverage production, unknowingly harnessing enzymatic activity in processes like and bread-making. In ancient Greece, philosophers such as documented observations of fermentation, noting in his works how substances like must (grape juice) transformed into wine through a resembling , attributing it to natural changes rather than vital forces. A pivotal advancement occurred in 1833 when French chemists Anselme Payen and Jean-François Persoz isolated diastase from germinating barley malt, marking the first preparation of an enzyme and demonstrating its ability to hydrolyze starch into sugars. This discovery laid the groundwork for enzymology as a scientific discipline, shifting focus from vague biological processes to isolable catalysts. In 1897, Eduard Buchner conducted cell-free fermentation experiments using yeast extracts, proving that enzymes could catalyze reactions without intact living cells and refuting the doctrine of vitalism; for this, he received the 1907 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. The early 20th century saw further purification and mechanistic insights, exemplified by James B. Sumner's 1926 crystallization of from jack bean, confirming enzymes as proteins and earning him the 1946 (shared with John H. Northrop and Wendell M. Stanley for related work). In 1913, and developed the foundational model of , describing the hyperbolic relationship between substrate concentration and through their equation, which revolutionized quantitative studies of . Later discoveries expanded the scope of enzymology beyond proteins. In the 1980s, and independently demonstrated that molecules could act as catalysts, termed ribozymes, challenging the protein-centric view of enzymes and earning them the 1989 . Building on this, in the 1990s, pioneered techniques, randomly mutating enzyme genes and selecting variants for desired functions, with her first successful application in 1993; this method transformed enzyme engineering and led to her 2018 . More recently, the 2024 recognized advancements in and structure prediction, with David Baker awarded for computational methods to create novel enzymes and and John Jumper for AI-based prediction tools like , which have revolutionized enzyme engineering and understanding.

Classification and Nomenclature

Enzyme Commission System

The Enzyme Commission (EC) System was established in 1956 by the International Union of Biochemistry (IUB), now known as the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB), to provide a standardized framework for classifying enzymes based on the reactions they catalyze and to prevent inconsistencies in nomenclature. This initiative arose from the rapid growth in enzyme discoveries during the mid-20th century, necessitating a systematic approach to organize the expanding body of knowledge. The first report of the Enzyme Commission was published in 1961, laying the foundation for the hierarchical classification that has since become the global standard. Enzymes are grouped into seven main classes under the EC System, each defined by the fundamental type of chemical transformation they facilitate. Oxidoreductases (EC 1) catalyze oxidation-reduction reactions involving , such as dehydrogenases that manage processes in . Transferases (EC 2) facilitate the transfer of functional groups like amino or phosphate groups from one to another. Hydrolases (EC 3) promote reactions, breaking bonds by adding , as seen in proteases and lipases. Lyases (EC 4) add or eliminate groups to form double bonds without or oxidation, including enzymes like decarboxylases. Isomerases (EC 5) enable intramolecular rearrangements, converting a into one of its isomers. Ligases (EC 6), also known as synthetases, join two molecules using from . Translocases (EC 7), added in 2018, catalyze the movement of ions or molecules across membranes or their relocation within membranes. The classification employs a four-digit numerical code in the format EC a.b.c.d, reflecting a hierarchical structure that refines enzyme specificity step by step. The first digit (a) indicates the main class (1 through 7), the second (b) denotes the subclass based on the type of reaction or substrate, the third (c) specifies the sub-subclass by further reaction details or bond involvement, and the fourth (d) identifies the of the specific enzyme within that group. For instance, EC designates , an that acts on primary or secondary alcohols using NAD+ as an acceptor. This numbering ensures unique identification and allows for systematic expansion as new enzymes are characterized. The EC System is dynamically maintained through the ExplorEnz database, the official IUBMB repository for enzyme nomenclature and classification, which undergoes regular updates to incorporate newly discovered or reclassified enzymes. As of the 2025.11 release, the database includes over 6,900 entries, with proposed changes subjected to a four-week public review period before integration. This ongoing curation by the Nomenclature Committee of the IUBMB ensures the system's relevance and accuracy in reflecting advances in enzymology.

Nomenclature Conventions

Enzymes are assigned both trivial and systematic names to facilitate clear and unambiguous communication in scientific literature. Trivial names, also known as recommended or accepted names, are concise and descriptive terms that often reflect the enzyme's function, source, or historical discovery, such as "trypsin" for a serine protease that hydrolyzes peptide bonds in proteins. These names are preferred for general use due to their brevity and familiarity but must be linked to the specific reaction catalyzed to avoid confusion. Systematic names, in contrast, provide a more precise description of the biochemical reaction by specifying the substrates involved and the type of transformation, typically in the format "substrate:product [reaction type]" or similar. For example, the systematic name for is "protein + H₂O = protein + ," emphasizing its activity on peptide bonds. This naming convention ensures that the name directly mirrors the catalyzed reaction, using accepted trivial names for complex substrates where possible to maintain usability. The International Union of Biochemistry and (IUBMB), through its Nomenclature Committee (NC-IUBMB), established these conventions in the 1978 recommendations, which have been periodically updated to incorporate new enzymatic activities and refine terminology. The guidelines mandate that enzyme names reflect the overall reaction catalyzed, based on experimental evidence of physiological substrates, and prohibit names derived solely from sequence similarity or non-enzymatic properties. Updates, such as those in the 1992 edition and subsequent supplements through 2025, address evolving knowledge while preserving the core principles. For multi-substrate reactions, nomenclature prioritizes the primary physiological substrates, listing additional ones in parentheses if they significantly contribute to the enzyme's function, to avoid overly complex names. For instance, in acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.3.9), the name specifies "acetyl-CoA:acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase" but includes qualifiers like "(thioester-hydrolysing, carboxymethyl-forming)" for clarity on mechanism. Ambiguities are resolved by creating separate entries for enzymes with distinct specificities or mechanisms, even if reactions appear similar, ensuring each name corresponds to a unique catalytic profile. Recommended names are finalized after review, while provisional or working names may be used during initial characterization. Enzyme nomenclature integrates with gene naming systems by associating EC numbers with gene symbols in databases, allowing sequence-based annotation of function; for example, the ECOD database uses structural homology to link protein domains to EC classifications, aiding in gene-enzyme correspondence. This complementary approach supports bioinformatics tools in predicting enzymatic roles from genomic data without altering the core reaction-based naming rules.

Structure

Chemical Composition

Enzymes are predominantly composed of proteins, which are linear polymers formed from 20 standard amino acids linked by peptide bonds. These amino acids include glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, serine, threonine, cysteine, methionine, asparagine, glutamine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, lysine, arginine, histidine, and proline, each contributing unique side chains that determine the enzyme's functional properties. The primary structure of these polypeptide chains, dictated by the genetic code, serves as the foundation for higher-order organization, ultimately influencing the enzyme's catalytic efficiency. Although most enzymes are proteins, a small subset known as ribozymes are composed of molecules capable of catalytic activity. Notable examples include self-splicing introns in thermophila, where the RNA folds to form an that cleaves and rejoins phosphodiester bonds without protein assistance. Ribozymes demonstrate that RNA can mimic protein enzyme functions, supporting theories on the hypothesis in early evolution. Post-translational modifications significantly alter the chemical composition of enzymes, enhancing their stability, localization, or activity. Common modifications include , where groups are covalently attached to , serine, or residues, and , which adds groups to serine, , or side chains, often regulating enzymatic function through charge alterations. These modifications can introduce functional groups that fine-tune substrate specificity or enable interactions with cellular components. Enzyme molecular weights vary widely but typically range from 10 to 100 kDa for monomeric forms, reflecting the number of (roughly 100-900 residues). Larger enzymes, such as DNA polymerase III, can exceed 300 kDa due to multi-subunit assemblies, allowing for complex functions like . Specific play critical roles in ; for instance, in serine proteases like , acts as a general base to facilitate nucleophilic attack by the serine hydroxyl group. This composition directly impacts the enzyme's ability to fold into functional conformations.

Three-Dimensional Architecture

The three-dimensional architecture of enzymes, as specialized proteins, is organized hierarchically across primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary levels, with each level contributing to the stability and functional specificity essential for catalysis. The primary structure consists of the linear of covalently linked by bonds, which serves as the foundational blueprint determining all subsequent folding patterns, as established by Christian Anfinsen's thermodynamic hypothesis through experiments on A folding. This sequence encodes the information needed for the protein to achieve its native conformation under physiological conditions, ensuring the enzyme's structural integrity and reactivity. At the secondary structure level, segments of the polypeptide chain fold into local conformations such as α-helices, β-sheets, and unstructured loops, primarily stabilized by hydrogen bonds between backbone atoms. These elements form the building blocks of the enzyme's scaffold, providing rigidity and flexibility that facilitate substrate positioning and dynamic movements during . The tertiary structure represents the global three-dimensional arrangement of these secondary elements into a compact fold, driven by non-covalent interactions including hydrophobic effects that bury nonpolar residues in the core, electrostatic forces, van der Waals interactions, and covalent bridges in some cases. This folding creates a stable globular domain that shields reactive groups and orients functional regions precisely, enabling efficient enzymatic activity. For enzymes requiring cooperative or regulated function, a quaternary structure assembles multiple polypeptide subunits into a functional complex, often through similar intermolecular interactions as in tertiary folding. A representative example is lactate dehydrogenase, a tetrameric enzyme with four identical subunits that enhance allosteric regulation and catalytic efficiency. Common structural motifs recur across enzyme families, underscoring evolutionary conservation for functional versatility; the TIM barrel, characterized by eight alternating α-helices and β-strands forming a cylindrical core, is prevalent in metabolic enzymes like triosephosphate isomerase, providing a robust framework for diverse reactions. Similarly, the Rossmann fold, featuring parallel β-sheets flanked by α-helices, dominates in nucleotide-binding dehydrogenases such as alcohol dehydrogenase, optimizing cofactor interactions. These folds and overall architectures are systematically classified in databases like SCOP (Structural Classification of Proteins) and CATH (Class, Architecture, Topology, Homologous superfamily), which organize enzyme domains by structural similarity to reveal evolutionary relationships and design principles.

Active Site Characteristics

The active site of an enzyme is a specialized region, typically a pocket or cleft on the protein's surface, formed by the precise arrangement of specific residues that enable substrate recognition and . These residues, often distant in the primary sequence, converge in the three-dimensional structure to create a microenvironment optimized for chemical reactions, with the site's dictating the enzyme's specificity and efficiency. For instance, in serine proteases like , the active site features a composed of serine, , and aspartate residues, where the nucleophilic serine hydroxyl group is positioned for attack on the substrate, facilitated by hydrogen bonding from histidine and stabilization by aspartate. Binding pockets within the are tailored to accommodate substrates based on their chemical properties; hydrophobic pockets, lined with non-polar such as or , interact with non-polar substrates through van der Waals forces, while charged or polar pockets incorporate residues like or glutamate to form electrostatic interactions or bonds with polar or ionic substrates. Specificity is further determined by the active site's , , and electrostatic profile, which ensure selective substrate binding and exclude non-cognate molecules—for example, the oxyanion hole in proteases, formed by backbone groups, stabilizes negatively charged transition states through bonding, enhancing catalytic precision. Visualization of active site characteristics has been advanced through techniques such as , (NMR) spectroscopy, and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), which reveal atomic-level details of the site's architecture. A classic example is hen egg-white , where in the disclosed a long, narrow cleft in the that accommodates the substrate, with key residues like Glu35 and Asp52 positioned for . These methods, often complemented by computational modeling, continue to elucidate how subtle variations in active site features underpin enzymatic diversity across biological systems.

Mechanism of Catalysis

Substrate Binding

Substrate binding is the initial step in , where the substrate molecule is recognized and attached to the enzyme's through specific interactions that ensure high selectivity. The classical model for this process, proposed by in 1894, describes the enzyme and substrate as possessing complementary geometric shapes, analogous to a , allowing only the correct substrate to fit precisely into the rigid of the enzyme. This lock-and-key hypothesis emphasized the structural specificity that prevents non-substrate molecules from binding effectively, thereby explaining the observed selectivity of enzymatic reactions. Subsequent observations revealed limitations in the rigid lock-and-key model, leading to the induced fit model introduced by Daniel E. Koshland in 1958. In this framework, the enzyme undergoes a conformational change upon initial substrate contact, adjusting its to achieve a tighter, more complementary fit that not only enhances specificity but also positions catalytic residues optimally for the reaction. This dynamic adjustment is particularly evident in enzymes like , where substrate binding induces a large-scale closure of the cleft, excluding water and stabilizing the . The energy of substrate binding arises primarily from non-covalent interactions between the substrate and amino acid residues in the active site, including hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, and van der Waals forces, which collectively contribute to the enzyme's specificity by discriminating against incorrect substrates. These interactions lower the free energy of the enzyme-substrate complex relative to the unbound state, with hydrogen bonds often providing directional precision and van der Waals forces enabling close-range attractions. The strength of substrate binding is quantitatively assessed by the dissociation constant KdK_d, defined as Kd=[E][S][ES]K_d = \frac{[E][S]}{[ES]}, where [E] is the concentration of free enzyme, [S] is the concentration of free substrate, and [ES] is the concentration of the enzyme-substrate complex at equilibrium. A lower KdK_d value indicates higher binding affinity, reflecting tighter interactions that are crucial for efficient in physiological conditions.

Catalytic Process

Enzymes facilitate the transformation of substrates into products by stabilizing the of the reaction, thereby lowering the barrier through mechanisms such as electrostatic interactions, acid-base , and the formation of covalent intermediates. Electrostatic involves charged residues in the that stabilize polar transition states via hydrogen bonding or ionic interactions, while acid-base employs proton donors and acceptors, often from side chains like or aspartate, to facilitate proton transfer during the reaction. Covalent occurs when a nucleophilic group on the enzyme, such as a serine residue, forms a transient with the substrate, creating a reactive intermediate that lowers the energy of subsequent steps. In hydrolases, such as serine proteases, catalysis often proceeds via nucleophilic attack by the enzyme's serine hydroxyl group on the substrate's carbonyl carbon, forming a tetrahedral intermediate that is stabilized by the oxyanion hole in the . For oxidoreductases, exemplified by , the mechanism involves hydride transfer from the substrate alcohol to the NAD+ coenzyme, facilitated by coordination that polarizes the substrate and positions it for efficient transfer. These catalytic strategies enable enzymes to accelerate reaction rates by factors up to 10^{20}-fold compared to uncatalyzed reactions in solution. The , denoted as k_{cat}, represents the maximum number of substrate molecules converted to product per enzyme per second under saturating substrate conditions, reflecting the enzyme's catalytic once the substrate is bound.

Conformational Dynamics

Enzymes exhibit intrinsic conformational dynamics that involve flexible movements such as hinge bending and loop closing, which are essential for their catalytic function. These motions allow the protein to transition between open and closed states, facilitating the accommodation of substrates and the stabilization of transition states during . For instance, in , binding of glucose induces a large hinge-bending motion between its two domains, closing the cleft by approximately 8 Å to enclose the substrate and exclude water, thereby enhancing specificity and efficiency. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and are key techniques for probing these dynamics at atomic and temporal resolutions. MD simulations model the time evolution of enzyme structures, revealing how drive hinge and loop motions on picosecond to microsecond timescales, as demonstrated in studies of where hinge unfolding correlates with substrate access. , such as single-molecule (smFRET), captures real-time conformational changes, for example, in , where active-site fluctuations occur on scales and synchronize with catalytic turnover. These dynamics play a critical role in enabling substrate entry and exit while stabilizing the transition state to lower activation barriers. In the catalytic cycle, loop closing motions position catalytic residues optimally, reducing entropy loss and promoting efficient proton transfer or nucleophilic attack. For HIV-1 protease, conformational fluctuations in the flap regions—opening and closing on millisecond timescales—allow substrate binding and have informed inhibitor design by targeting semi-open states to trap the enzyme in non-productive conformations, improving antiviral efficacy. Such intrinsic flexibility underpins the induced fit model, where dynamics adapt the enzyme to substrates without requiring external regulators.

Cofactors and Coenzymes

Inorganic Cofactors

Inorganic cofactors, primarily divalent and ions such as Zn²⁺, Mg²⁺, Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺, and Cu²⁺, serve as essential non-organic auxiliaries in , enabling reactions without being consumed themselves. These ions are present in more than one-third of known proteins, where they coordinate with specific residues to facilitate diverse biochemical processes. Representative examples illustrate their catalytic roles. In II, Zn²⁺ acts as a Lewis acid by coordinating a , lowering its pKa from approximately 10 to 7 and generating a nucleophilic ion at physiological to hydrate CO₂ into . Similarly, Mg²⁺ in kinases like coordinates the phosphate groups of ATP and ADP, optimizing the nucleophilic attack angle to nearly 180° and enhancing phosphoryl transfer efficiency by over 40,000-fold. In , Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ undergoes cycling within the group, transferring electrons in mitochondrial respiration with a standard around +260 mV that supports efficient energy capture. The primary functions of these cofactors include , where -inert ions like Zn²⁺ polarize substrates to activate nucleophiles; mediation, as seen with Fe ions that alternate oxidation states to shuttle electrons; and structural stabilization, such as Zn²⁺ reinforcing protein folds in zinc-finger motifs to maintain integrity. Metal ions typically bind through coordinate covalent interactions with side chains, often forming tetrahedral geometries with imidazole nitrogens—for example, Zn²⁺ in is ligated by His94, His96, and His119 alongside a . These bindings integrate seamlessly with the apoenzyme structure to form the active holoenzyme. Disruptions in metal can severely impair enzyme function. In , mutations in the ATP7B gene cause hepatic accumulation, reducing activity in Cu-dependent enzymes such as (a ferroxidase), (essential for ATP synthesis), and (an ), leading to , liver damage, and neurological deficits.

Organic Coenzymes

Organic coenzymes are non-protein organic compounds, typically derived from , that serve as transient carriers of chemical groups during enzymatic reactions. Unlike prosthetic groups tightly bound to enzymes, these coenzymes loosely associate with the and function as second substrates, accepting or donating moieties such as ions, electrons, acyl groups, or amino groups to facilitate . Their vitamin origins ensure dietary dependence, as most organisms cannot synthesize these precursors de novo. A key example is (NAD⁺/NADH), biosynthesized from niacin (vitamin B₃). In dehydrogenases, NAD⁺ acts as an oxidant by accepting a ion (H⁻) from the substrate at the C4 position of its ring, forming NADH and enabling oxidation reactions such as the conversion of lactate to pyruvate. NADH subsequently donates the hydride to other acceptors, regenerating NAD⁺ for reuse in a cyclic manner, distinct from the consumption of primary substrates. Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), derived from (vitamin B₂), participates in electron transport within oxidoreductases. FAD accepts two electrons and two protons to form FADH₂ through semiquinone intermediates, supporting reactions like succinate oxidation to fumarate; it is then reoxidized by downstream electron acceptors such as ubiquinone, allowing continuous cycling without net consumption. Coenzyme A (CoA), synthesized from (vitamin B₅), functions as an carrier in enzymes involved in . The terminal (-SH) group of CoA forms high-energy linkages with acyl moieties, as in during fatty acid β-oxidation or citrate synthesis; upon transfer of the acyl group to an acceptor, free CoA is released and recycled for subsequent activations. Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP), derived from (vitamin B₆), enables amino group transfer in transaminases and other amino acid-modifying enzymes. PLP forms a covalent with the substrate amino acid via its group, facilitating proton abstraction and group exchange—such as converting an amino acid to its corresponding α-keto acid—before reacting with a second substrate to regenerate the free coenzyme. These coenzymes are regenerated through coupled metabolic pathways, ensuring their availability for multiple turnover events in enzymatic catalysis.

Thermodynamics

Energy Barriers

Enzymes accelerate chemical reactions by lowering the activation energy barrier, EaE_a, which is the energy required to reach the transition state from the reactants. According to the Arrhenius equation, the rate constant kk of a reaction is given by k=AeEa/RTk = A e^{-E_a / RT}, where AA is the pre-exponential factor, RR is the gas constant, and TT is the temperature in Kelvin; a reduction in EaE_a exponentially increases the reaction rate. In enzymatic catalysis, this lowering of EaE_a enables reactions to proceed at biologically relevant rates and temperatures, often by orders of magnitude faster than the uncatalyzed counterparts. Transition state theory provides the thermodynamic framework for understanding this effect, positing that enzymes stabilize the transition state (TS) more tightly than the ground-state substrates or products, thereby reducing the free energy of , ΔG\Delta G^\ddagger. This preferential binding to the TS, first proposed by , decreases ΔG\Delta G^\ddagger and thus EaE_a, as the enzyme's is complementary to the TS geometry and charge distribution. For instance, in chorismate mutase, electrostatic interactions at the stabilize the TS of the , contributing up to 5.9 kcal/mol to the ΔG\Delta G^\ddagger reduction through specific residues like Arg90. The reduction in often involves both enthalpic and contributions, with enzymes minimizing the penalty associated with organizing reactants for reaction. In solution, reactions incur a high cost due to the loss of translational and rotational freedom upon forming the reactive complex, as well as reorganization . Enzymes counteract this through pre-organization of the , which is already configured to complement the TS, thereby reducing the need for large conformational adjustments and associated loss during . This pre-organization effectively lowers the overall ΔG\Delta G^\ddagger by favoring enthalpic stabilization while mitigating barriers, as seen in cases where the enzyme environment substitutes for in a low-dielectric . A striking example is orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC), which catalyzes the of orotidine 5'-monophosphate to uridine 5'-monophosphate with a rate acceleration of approximately 101710^{17}-fold compared to the uncatalyzed reaction. This enormous enhancement arises primarily from electrostatic stabilization of the vinyl anion-like , where active site residues such as Lys72 position charges to delocalize the negative charge developing during . While additional interactions, like a from Ser127 to the substrate's O4, contribute modestly (about 10210^2-fold), the dominant effect is the enthalpic stabilization of the TS through electrostatic pre-organization, underscoring how enzymes exploit such mechanisms to surmount energy barriers efficiently.

Equilibrium and Reversibility

Enzymes catalyze chemical reactions by lowering the barrier, thereby accelerating the rate at which the system approaches equilibrium, but they do not alter the position of equilibrium or the standard change (ΔG°) of the reaction. The change for a reaction is given by ΔG = ΔH - TΔS, where ΔH is the change, T is the absolute , and ΔS is the change; enzymes influence neither the thermodynamic parameters ΔH nor ΔS, nor the resulting ΔG°, which determines the spontaneity and of the reaction. Instead, enzymes facilitate the reaction along a pathway that stabilizes the , allowing the system to reach the same equilibrium ratio of reactants to products more rapidly than in the uncatalyzed case. Most enzymatic reactions are reversible, meaning the enzyme can catalyze the reaction in either direction depending on substrate and product concentrations, as long as the reaction does not violate thermodynamic constraints. For instance, isomerases such as triose phosphate isomerase in interconvert and in a readily reversible manner, with an close to unity that reflects minimal free energy difference between substrates. In contrast, some reactions appear effectively irreversible under physiological conditions due to a highly negative ΔG, such as the of ATP to ADP and inorganic catalyzed by ATPases, where ΔG° is approximately -30.5 kJ/mol, driving the reaction overwhelmingly toward product formation and preventing significant reversal. The relationship between enzymatic kinetic parameters and is encapsulated in the Haldane equation, derived from steady-state kinetics, which connects the (K_eq = [P]/[S] at equilibrium) to the maximum velocities (k_cat) and Michaelis constants (K_m) for the forward and reverse reactions: K_eq = (k_cat^f / K_m^f) / (k_cat^r / K_m^r), where superscripts f and r denote forward and reverse directions. This equation demonstrates that while enzymes enhance rates through favorable kinetic constants, these parameters must align with the underlying to maintain the equilibrium position dictated by ΔG°. In metabolic pathways, enzymes often participate in coupled reactions to drive thermodynamically unfavorable (endergonic) steps by linking them to highly exergonic reactions, such as , through shared intermediates that make the overall process spontaneous. For example, the endergonic synthesis of from glutamate and (ΔG° ≈ +14 kJ/mol) is coupled to via , resulting in a net ΔG° of about -16 kJ/mol and rendering the coupled reaction effectively irreversible in the forward direction. This coupling ensures that non-spontaneous transformations proceed efficiently within cellular constraints, without enzymes altering the intrinsic ΔG° of individual steps.

Kinetics

Rate Laws

The rate of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction is defined as the v=d[P]dtv = \frac{d[P]}{dt}, where [P] is the product concentration, and this rate depends on the total enzyme concentration [E], substrate concentration [S], and environmental conditions such as and . This general rate law provides the foundation for analyzing how enzymes accelerate reactions by stabilizing transition states, though rates are ultimately constrained by thermodynamic principles governing energies. Enzyme reaction orders vary with substrate concentration, reflecting the saturation behavior of the enzyme active site. At saturating [S], where all enzyme molecules are bound to substrate, the reaction exhibits zero-order kinetics: the rate becomes independent of further increases in [S] and is determined solely by the enzyme's catalytic capacity, often expressed as v=kcat[E]v = k_{\text{cat}} [E]. In contrast, at low [S] where substrate binding is limiting, the reaction follows first-order kinetics, with vv proportional to [S] as the probability of enzyme-substrate encounters increases linearly. These orders highlight the transition from substrate-limited to enzyme-limited regimes in typical enzyme kinetics profiles. For enzymes acting on multiple substrates, rate laws adopt more complex forms based on the binding and mechanism. Sequential mechanisms require all substrates to bind to the enzyme before any product is released; in ordered sequential mechanisms, substrates bind in a specific sequence, while random sequential allows any order, leading to rate equations that include terms for binary, ternary, and higher complexes. Ping-pong mechanisms, also known as double-displacement, involve the enzyme first binding one substrate to form and release a product, modifying the enzyme (e.g., via covalent intermediate), before the second substrate binds to the altered form; this results in parallel line patterns in double-reciprocal plots and rate laws featuring reciprocal substrate terms without cross-interaction products. These distinctions, formalized by Cleland's nomenclature, enable mechanistic diagnosis through initial velocity studies varying substrate concentrations. A key approximation in deriving enzyme rate laws is the steady-state assumption, proposed by Briggs and Haldane, which holds that during the initial phase of the reaction—before significant product accumulation or substrate depletion—the concentration of the enzyme-substrate complex [ES] remains nearly constant, such that d[ES]dt0\frac{d[ES]}{dt} \approx 0. This condition arises because the rates of ES formation and breakdown equilibrate rapidly compared to overall product formation, simplifying the differential equations for [ES] and allowing focus on initial velocities under controlled conditions. The assumption is valid when [E] << [S] and is widely applied in kinetic analyses to predict rates without solving full time-dependent systems.

Michaelis-Menten Model

The Michaelis-Menten model describes the kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions involving a single substrate, providing a foundational framework for understanding how reaction velocity depends on substrate concentration. Originally proposed by and in 1913 based on equilibrium assumptions for the invertase reaction, the model was refined in 1925 by George E. Briggs and J.B.S. Haldane using a steady-state approximation, which is the standard form used today. The model assumes the reaction proceeds via the formation of an enzyme-substrate (ES) complex: E+Sk1k1ESkcatE+PE + S \underset{k_{-1}}{\stackrel{k_1}{\rightleftharpoons}} ES \stackrel{k_{\text{cat}}}{\rightarrow} E + P where EE is the , SS the substrate, PP the product, k1k_1 the association rate constant, k1k_{-1} the dissociation rate constant, and kcatk_{\text{cat}} (also called k2k_2) the catalytic rate constant. The initial reaction velocity vv is given by the Michaelis-Menten equation: v=Vmax[S]Km+[S]v = \frac{V_{\max} [S]}{K_m + [S]} Here, VmaxV_{\max} is the maximum velocity achieved when the enzyme is saturated with substrate, defined as Vmax=kcat[E]totalV_{\max} = k_{\text{cat}} [E]_{\text{total}}, where [E]total[E]_{\text{total}} is the total enzyme concentration; KmK_m is the Michaelis constant, representing the substrate concentration at which v=Vmax/2v = V_{\max}/2, and given by Km=(k1+kcat)/k1K_m = (k_{-1} + k_{\text{cat}})/k_1. This hyperbolic relationship indicates that velocity increases with substrate concentration but approaches VmaxV_{\max} asymptotically. The steady-state derivation begins by applying the quasi-steady-state approximation to the ES complex, assuming d[ES]/dt0d[ES]/dt \approx 0 after an initial transient phase. The rate of ES formation equals its rate of depletion: k1[E][S]=(k1+kcat)[ES]k_1 [E] [S] = (k_{-1} + k_{\text{cat}}) [ES] Since [E]=[E]total[ES][E] = [E]_{\text{total}} - [ES], solving for [ES][ES] yields: [ES]=[E]total[S]Km+[S][ES] = \frac{[E]_{\text{total}} [S]}{K_m + [S]} The velocity v=kcat[ES]v = k_{\text{cat}} [ES] then substitutes to give the Michaelis-Menten equation. This approach relaxes the rapid equilibrium assumption of the original model, making it applicable to a broader range of enzymes where the catalytic step is not necessarily slow compared to dissociation. To estimate KmK_m and VmaxV_{\max} experimentally, the Lineweaver-Burk double-reciprocal plot linearizes the equation: 1v=KmVmax1[S]+1Vmax\frac{1}{v} = \frac{K_m}{V_{\max}} \cdot \frac{1}{[S]} + \frac{1}{V_{\max}} Plotting 1/v1/v versus 1/[S]1/[S] produces a straight line with slope Km/VmaxK_m / V_{\max}, y-intercept 1/Vmax1/V_{\max}, and x-intercept 1/Km-1/K_m. Introduced by Hans Lineweaver and Dean Burk in 1934, this transformation facilitates parameter determination from initial rate data but can amplify errors at low substrate concentrations. The model relies on key assumptions, including measurement of initial rates where product accumulation is negligible (avoiding product inhibition or reverse reactions) and the absence of complicating factors like multiple substrates or enzyme instability. It applies well to non-allosteric enzymes but has limitations for allosteric enzymes, where cooperative substrate binding leads to sigmoidal rather than hyperbolic kinetics, as described in the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model.

Inhibition

Reversible Inhibition

Reversible inhibition occurs when an inhibitor binds non-covalently to an enzyme, forming a reversible complex that can dissociate, thereby modulating enzyme activity without permanent alteration. This type of inhibition is characterized by equilibrium binding and can be analyzed using modifications of the Michaelis-Menten kinetic model, where the inhibition constant KiK_i quantifies the inhibitor's affinity for the enzyme, with lower values indicating stronger binding. In competitive inhibition, the inhibitor binds exclusively to the free enzyme at the active site, competing directly with the substrate and preventing substrate binding. This increases the apparent Michaelis constant KmK_m while leaving the maximum velocity VmaxV_{max} unchanged, as higher substrate concentrations can outcompete the inhibitor. The modified velocity equation is: v=Vmax[S]Km(1+[I]Ki)+[S]v = \frac{V_{max} [S]}{K_m (1 + \frac{[I]}{K_i}) + [S]} A representative example is the action of statins, such as lovastatin, which competitively inhibit by mimicking the substrate and binding to its active site, thereby reducing cholesterol biosynthesis. Non-competitive inhibition involves the inhibitor binding to a site distinct from the active site on either the free enzyme or the enzyme-substrate complex with equal affinity, thereby reducing the enzyme's catalytic efficiency without affecting substrate binding. This decreases the apparent VmaxV_{max} but leaves KmK_m unchanged, as the inhibitor does not interfere with substrate affinity. The velocity equation becomes: v=Vmax[S](Km+[S])(1+[I]Ki)v = \frac{V_{max} [S]}{(K_m + [S]) (1 + \frac{[I]}{K_i})} Heavy metals like mercury or lead exemplify non-competitive inhibitors, binding to sulfhydryl groups on enzymes such as pyruvate kinase and impairing function regardless of substrate presence. Uncompetitive inhibition is distinguished by the inhibitor binding solely to the enzyme-substrate complex, stabilizing it and preventing product formation. This results in a decrease in both apparent KmK_m and VmaxV_{max}, with the reduction in KmK_m arising from the inhibitor's enhancement of substrate affinity in the complex. The kinetic equation is: v=Vmax[S]Km+[S](1+[I]Ki)v = \frac{V_{max} [S]}{K_m + [S] (1 + \frac{[I]}{K_i})} Lithium serves as an uncompetitive inhibitor of inositol monophosphatase, binding to the enzyme-substrate complex and inhibiting dephosphorylation of inositol phosphates, a mechanism implicated in its therapeutic effects on bipolar disorder. Mixed inhibition encompasses cases where the inhibitor binds to both the free enzyme and the enzyme-substrate complex, but with differing affinities, combining elements of competitive and non-competitive inhibition. It alters both KmK_m and VmaxV_{max}, with the degree of change depending on the relative dissociation constants KiK_i (for free enzyme) and KiK_i' (for the complex). The general velocity equation is: v=Vmax[S]Km(1+[I]Ki)+[S](1+[I]Ki)v = \frac{V_{max} [S]}{K_m (1 + \frac{[I]}{K_i}) + [S] (1 + \frac{[I]}{K_i'})} The inhibition constant KiK_i is formally defined as the dissociation constant for the enzyme-inhibitor complex, Ki=[E][I][EI]K_i = \frac{[E][I]}{[EI]}, providing a measure of binding strength that is central to comparing inhibitor potencies across these reversible mechanisms.

Irreversible Inhibition

Irreversible inhibition occurs when an inhibitor forms a covalent bond with the enzyme, permanently inactivating it and preventing substrate binding or catalysis. This contrasts with reversible inhibition, where the inhibitor can dissociate from the enzyme. The process typically involves a two-step mechanism: an initial non-covalent binding step followed by irreversible covalent modification. A common mechanism is the nucleophilic attack by an enzyme residue, such as a serine hydroxyl group, on an electrophilic center in the inhibitor, leading to covalent adduct formation. For instance, acts as an irreversible inhibitor of bacterial DD-transpeptidase by mimicking the D-Ala-D-Ala substrate; the β-lactam ring opens upon binding, allowing the serine nucleophile to acylate the inhibitor, blocking peptidoglycan cross-linking in cell walls. The kinetics of irreversible inhibition are characterized by time-dependent loss of enzyme activity, often modeled as pseudo-first-order inactivation. The observed rate constant kobsk_{\text{obs}} follows the equation: kobs=kinact[I]KI+[I]k_{\text{obs}} = \frac{k_{\text{inact}} [I]}{K_I + [I]} where kinactk_{\text{inact}} is the maximum inactivation rate constant, [I][I] is the inhibitor concentration, and KIK_I is the dissociation constant for the initial enzyme-inhibitor complex. This hyperbolic relationship allows determination of potency through kinact/KIk_{\text{inact}}/K_I, a second-order rate constant reflecting overall efficiency. Representative examples include aspirin, which irreversibly acetylates Ser530 in the of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), inhibiting synthesis and platelet aggregation. Organophosphates, such as those in pesticides, phosphorylate the active-site serine in , preventing hydrolysis and causing cholinergic toxicity. Suicide inhibitors, also known as mechanism-based inhibitors, are prodrugs activated by the target enzyme's catalytic machinery to generate a reactive species that covalently modifies the enzyme. A key example is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), metabolized to 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine-5'-monophosphate (FdUMP), which forms a stable ternary complex with and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate, irreversibly inhibiting the enzyme and disrupting in cancer cells.

Regulation

Allosteric Effects

Allosteric effects in enzymes arise from the binding of regulatory molecules, termed effectors, to dedicated sites remote from the catalytic active site, inducing conformational changes that alter the enzyme's affinity for its substrate or its catalytic rate. This non-competitive modulation allows precise control of metabolic pathways without directly competing at the active site. Unlike simple inhibition or activation at the active site, allostery enables integrated responses to cellular signals, often in oligomeric enzymes where subunit interactions propagate the effect across the protein structure. Allosteric sites are structurally distinct from the , typically located at subunit interfaces or on non-catalytic domains, enabling specific recognition of effectors. A well-characterized example is aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase), the committed enzyme in pyrimidine biosynthesis, which consists of catalytic and regulatory subunits. (CTP), the pathway's end product, binds to allosteric sites on the regulatory subunits, stabilizing a low-affinity tense state and inhibiting activity by enhancing the sigmoidal response to aspartate, the substrate; this reduces enzyme velocity at physiological concentrations. In contrast, (ATP), signaling abundance, binds to the same sites, competing with CTP to favor a high-affinity relaxed state and activate the enzyme. These heterotropic effects fine-tune nucleotide balance without covalent modification. Theoretical models elucidate how allosteric binding translates to functional changes. The concerted Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) model describes the enzyme as existing in equilibrium between a tense (T) state of low substrate affinity and a relaxed (R) state of high affinity; all subunits transition simultaneously upon effector binding, shifting the T-R equilibrium without hybrid intermediates. This symmetry-conserving mechanism explains both homotropic substrate and heterotropic regulation, where inhibitors stabilize the T state and activators favor the R state. Alternatively, the sequential Koshland-Némethy-Filmer (KNF) model proposes an induced-fit process: binding to one subunit triggers a localized conformational change that sequentially alters adjacent subunits' affinities, allowing asymmetric intermediates and greater flexibility in cooperativity patterns. These models, while idealized, capture the essence of allosteric propagation in multisubunit enzymes. Cooperativity, a hallmark of allosteric enzymes, manifests as interdependent substrate binding sites, yielding sigmoidal kinetics that amplify responses to substrate concentration changes. The Hill equation quantifies this: θ=[S]nHK0.5nH+[S]nH\theta = \frac{[S]^{n_H}}{K_{0.5}^{n_H} + [S]^{n_H}} where θ\theta represents fractional saturation, [S][S] is substrate concentration, K0.5K_{0.5} is the concentration for half-maximal saturation, and nHn_H (the Hill coefficient) indicates degree: nH>1n_H > 1 for positive (enhanced binding after initial ligation), nH<1n_H < 1 for negative, and nH=1n_H = 1 for non-cooperative (Michaelis-Menten) . In ATCase, for instance, nH1.52n_H \approx 1.5-2 reflects moderate positive homotropic for aspartate. Allostery distinguishes homotropic effects, where the substrate itself acts as effector to drive its own , from heterotropic effects, where non-substrate molecules like CTP or ATP modulate independent of substrate binding. These interactions underpin sensitive regulatory switches in cellular .

Covalent Modifications

Covalent modifications represent a key mechanism for the post-translational regulation of enzyme activity, involving the addition or removal of chemical groups that can reversibly activate or deactivate enzymes through enzymatic control. These modifications allow cells to rapidly respond to signals by altering enzyme function without synthesizing new proteins. is one of the most prevalent covalent modifications, where kinases transfer a group from ATP to , , or residues on the enzyme, often inactivating it, while phosphatases remove the phosphate to restore activity. For instance, , which catalyzes synthesis, is inactivated by multi-site on serine residues by kinases such as cAMP-dependent and glycogen synthase kinase-3, increasing its Km for UDP-glucose and reducing catalytic efficiency; dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase-1 reactivates it. This reversible cycle exemplifies ultrasensitive , enabling switch-like responses to hormonal cues like or insulin. Other covalent modifications include , where acetyl groups are added to residues by histone acetyltransferases (e.g., p300) and removed by deacetylases (e.g., HDACs or sirtuins), modulating enzyme activity in metabolic pathways; , involving methyltransferases adding methyl groups to or , which can alter substrate binding or stability; and ubiquitination, where is attached via E1, E2, and E3 enzymes to mark enzymes for proteasomal degradation, thereby controlling protein levels and indirectly regulating activity. A notable example of irreversible covalent modification is activation, such as the proteolytic cleavage of to active by in the , which removes an N-terminal and forms stabilizing salt bridges, enabling the enzyme's catalytic function in protein . In signal transduction cascades, these modifications often operate reversibly; for example, in insulin signaling, phosphorylation of downstream enzymes like by insulin-stimulated kinases promotes , while fine-tunes the response to maintain .

Environmental Factors

Enzyme activity is profoundly influenced by environmental , which modulates the ionization states of catalytic residues such as , aspartate, and glutamate in the . Deviations from the optimal pH can protonate or deprotonate these residues, disrupting substrate binding or . For instance, , a in the gastric environment, exhibits maximal activity at pH 1.5–2, where acidic conditions facilitate its function in protein . In contrast, , involved in , achieves peak activity at pH 9–10, reflecting adaptation to alkaline cellular or extracellular compartments. The pH dependence typically manifests as a bell-shaped activity , with the optimum corresponding to the average pKa of key ionizable groups; activity declines sharply outside this range due to altered electrostatic interactions. Temperature exerts a dual effect on enzymes, initially enhancing reaction rates through increased molecular collisions and , as described by the , which relates the rate constant kk to TT via k=AeEa/RTk = A e^{-E_a / RT}, where AA is the , EaE_a is the , and RR is the . Most mammalian enzymes operate optimally near 37°C, but exceeding this threshold leads to thermal denaturation, where hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds weaken, causing irreversible unfolding and loss of native structure. Thermostable enzymes, such as Taq from , maintain activity up to 72–80°C, enabling applications like PCR due to their resistance to denaturation. Ionic strength and specific salts impact enzyme function by modulating electrostatic forces within the protein and between the enzyme and substrate. Higher can screen charges, stabilizing folded states or alleviating repulsion in active sites, though excessive levels may disrupt salt bridges. Divalent cations like Ca²⁺ often serve as essential cofactors, binding to specific sites to rigidify structures or participate in ; for example, A₂ requires Ca²⁺ for interfacial activation and . Monovalent ions such as Na⁺ or K⁺ can activate certain enzymes at low concentrations by facilitating conformational changes, but inhibitory effects emerge at higher levels. Denaturation represents a critical environmental perturbation, particularly from , resulting in irreversible unfolding that exposes hydrophobic cores and promotes aggregation. The melting (T_m), defined as the midpoint where 50% of the protein population is unfolded, quantifies thermal stability and is measured via techniques like . For many enzymes, T_m values range from 40–60°C, but engineered or thermophilic variants exceed 80°C, correlating with enhanced hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic packing. Once denatured, recovery of activity is rare without chaperones, underscoring the importance of physiological .

Biological Functions

Metabolic Pathways

Enzymes are integral to metabolic pathways, orchestrating the transformation of substrates in interconnected catabolic and anabolic networks that support cellular energy production and . In the glycolytic pathway, which converts glucose to pyruvate under anaerobic conditions, ten distinct enzymes catalyze sequential reactions, with initiating the process by phosphorylating glucose to glucose-6-phosphate. This pathway exemplifies how enzymes enable efficient breakdown of carbohydrates, yielding ATP and NADH for cellular use. The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, a core amphibolic pathway in aerobic respiration, relies on eight enzymes to oxidize derived from or fatty acid breakdown, generating reducing equivalents for the . Citrate synthase, the first enzyme, catalyzes the condensation of with oxaloacetate to produce citrate, linking upstream catabolism to downstream energy yield. In autotrophic organisms, photosynthetic pathways such as the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle depend on enzymes like ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (), which fixes atmospheric CO2 into 3-phosphoglycerate, facilitating carbon assimilation and the synthesis of sugars. Metabolic flux through these pathways is tightly controlled by rate-limiting enzymes that dictate overall throughput based on substrate availability and energy demands. For example, in catalyzes the irreversible of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, serving as a primary regulatory point to prevent unnecessary glucose consumption when energy is abundant. Such control ensures balanced integration of catabolic and anabolic processes across cellular compartments. Spatial compartmentalization enhances pathway efficiency and specificity, with glycolytic enzymes localized in the to rapidly process cytoplasmic glucose, while TCA cycle enzymes reside in the , coupling oxidation to . This segregation prevents interference between pathways and optimizes metabolite gradients. Multi-enzyme complexes, known as metabolons, further streamline reactions; the , bridging and the TCA cycle, assembles multiple subunits to channel pyruvate-derived directly to , minimizing diffusion losses and intermediate exposure. Regulation mechanisms briefly coordinate these pathways to synchronize flux with cellular needs.

Cellular Control Mechanisms

Cells maintain metabolic through precise control of enzyme availability and positioning, ensuring that catalytic activities align with cellular demands. One primary mechanism involves of enzyme , where environmental signals modulate the synthesis of specific enzymes. For instance, in , the exemplifies inducible expression: in the presence of , the protein dissociates from the operator region, allowing to transcribe genes encoding β-galactosidase, lactose permease, and thiogalactoside transacetylase, thereby enabling lactose metabolism only when glucose is scarce. Enzyme protein levels are further regulated post-transcriptionally by balancing synthesis and degradation rates. Protein synthesis rates are influenced by translational efficiency and mRNA stability, while degradation primarily occurs via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, where enzymes targeted for turnover are polyubiquitinated and degraded by the 26S proteasome complex. This selective degradation prevents accumulation of unnecessary or damaged enzymes, maintaining optimal concentrations. Additionally, molecular chaperones, such as and GroEL/GroES, assist in proper folding of newly synthesized enzymes, preventing aggregation and ensuring functional maturation; misfolded enzymes may be directed to degradation pathways if refolding fails. Subcellular localization restricts enzyme activity to specific compartments, enhancing efficiency and preventing off-target effects. Lysosomal hydrolases, like acid phosphatases and cathepsins, are trafficked to lysosomes via mannose-6-phosphate receptors in the Golgi apparatus, where they function optimally in the acidic lumen to degrade macromolecules. proteins further organize enzymes into multi-enzyme complexes or signaling hubs, localizing them to precise cellular locales; for example, A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs) tether and phosphatases to maintain localized cAMP signaling, indirectly influencing enzyme regulation. Feedback loops provide dynamic control by integrating enzyme activity with pathway outputs, particularly through product inhibition. In metabolic pathways, end products often bind to upstream enzymes, allosterically inhibiting their activity to prevent overproduction; a classic case is the inhibition of aspartate transcarbamoylase by CTP in , which halts the pathway when levels are sufficient. These mechanisms collectively ensure that enzyme quantities and localizations adapt to maintain balanced across cellular contexts.

Pathological Roles

Enzyme deficiencies arising from genetic mutations can lead to severe pathological conditions by disrupting critical metabolic processes. (PKU), an autosomal recessive disorder, results from mutations in the PAH gene, causing a deficiency in (PAH), the enzyme responsible for converting to ; this leads to toxic accumulation of , resulting in , seizures, and behavioral issues if untreated. Lysosomal storage diseases, such as , exemplify another category of enzyme deficiencies, where mutations in the GBA1 gene impair activity, causing accumulation of in lysosomes; this manifests as , , , and in type 1 , with neurological involvement in types 2 and 3. In cancer, enzyme overactivity often drives uncontrolled and immortality. , a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that maintains length, is reactivated and overexpressed in approximately 90% of human cancers, enabling limitless replicative potential and tumor progression by preventing shortening-induced . Similarly, oncogenic kinases like BCR-ABL, a fusion resulting from the translocation, constitutively activate signaling pathways in chronic (CML), promoting leukemic cell survival, proliferation, and resistance to . Therapeutic strategies targeting pathological enzyme activities have revolutionized treatment for enzyme-related diseases. Enzyme inhibitors, such as , a selective , bind to the BCR-ABL kinase domain and block its ATP-binding site, inducing remission in over 90% of CML patients by halting aberrant signaling. For deficiencies, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) delivers recombinant enzymes intravenously; in , imiglucerase (recombinant ) reduces substrate accumulation, alleviating visceral and skeletal symptoms. Advanced approaches include antibody-linked enzymes in antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT), where tumor-targeted antibodies conjugate enzymes like carboxypeptidase to activate non-toxic s selectively at cancer sites, minimizing systemic toxicity. Enzymes also serve as biomarkers for diagnosing pathological conditions through their abnormal levels in bodily fluids. Elevated kinase-MB (CK-MB), a cardiac-specific isoenzyme, in serum indicates , rising within 3-6 hours of injury due to cardiomyocyte and peaking at 16-30 hours, aiding rapid diagnosis when combined with troponins.

Evolution

Origins and Ancestry

The evolutionary origins of enzymes trace back to prebiotic chemistry on , where simple catalytic molecules likely facilitated the emergence of life before the dominance of protein-based enzymes. In the proposed hypothesis, molecules served as both genetic material and catalysts, known as , which performed essential reactions without protein assistance. These ribozymes are considered precursors to modern enzymes, enabling self-replication and basic metabolism in a pre-protein era. A prominent example is the peptidyl transferase center of the , which functions as a ribozyme to catalyze formation during protein synthesis, suggesting that RNA-based catalysis predated the protein world. Genomic and fossil evidence places the timeline of enzyme origins around 4 billion years ago, coinciding with the formation of the first cellular forms shortly after Earth's oceans stabilized. This period aligns with the appearance of the (LUCA), a hypothetical progenitor from which all extant descends, possessing a core set of enzymes essential for basic cellular functions. Notably, , which generates ATP via proton gradients across membranes, is conserved across bacterial and archaeal domains and is inferred to have been present in LUCA, indicating its ancient role in . Throughout evolutionary history, has significantly influenced enzyme distribution, allowing rapid dissemination of catalytic capabilities across microbial lineages. For instance, genes encoding enzymes that confer resistance, such as beta-lactamases, have spread via plasmids and other mobile elements, accelerating in response to environmental pressures. This mechanism highlights how enzyme evolution extended beyond vertical inheritance, shaping microbial diversity from early prokaryotic communities. Modern enzyme structures often retain ancient protein folds, echoing these primordial catalytic motifs.

Adaptive Diversification

Enzymes achieve adaptive diversification through evolutionary mechanisms that enable the emergence of new functions, primarily via , , moonlighting, and laboratory-directed , allowing organisms to respond to changing environmental pressures and metabolic demands. Gene duplication events provide a key substrate for this process by creating paralogous copies that initially retain the original function but face relaxed selective constraints, permitting mutations to accumulate without immediate fitness costs. This can lead to neofunctionalization, where one copy evolves a novel catalytic activity while the other maintains the ancestral role, thereby expanding the enzyme repertoire without disrupting existing pathways. In the alpha-amylase family, gene duplications have driven neofunctionalization, resulting in diverse starch-degrading enzymes adapted to specific ecological niches, such as the evolution of beta-amylases in angiosperms that exhibit sub- or neo-functionalization through extensive duplication events across eight distinct clades. These duplications allow for specialization, for instance, in hydrolyzing different glycosidic bonds under varying conditions like or in and microbial lineages. Similarly, in ancestral enzymes—characterized by low substrate specificity—serves as an evolutionary starting point, enabling weak side activities to be refined into high-efficiency new functions under selective pressure, as seen in the transition from generalist hydrolases to specialized lipases or esterases. This promiscuous foundation facilitates innovation by providing latent catalytic potential that can be co-opted for novel metabolisms. Moonlighting enzymes further exemplify adaptive versatility, where a single protein performs multiple, often unrelated functions depending on cellular context, such as localization or binding partners, without requiring sequence divergence. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), primarily involved in glycolysis, also acts in apoptosis by translocating to the nucleus to bind DNA and promote cell death signaling, a role that enhances cellular control mechanisms in response to stress. This multifunctionality arises evolutionarily from structural features that allow conformational flexibility, enabling the enzyme to switch roles without gene duplication. In laboratory settings, directed evolution mimics these natural processes by iteratively applying random mutagenesis and selection to engineer enzymes with desired properties, as demonstrated by Frances Arnold's development of cytochrome P450 variants capable of stereoselective cyclopropanation, achieving up to 99% enantioselectivity for non-natural reactions like carbene transfer to alkenes. These engineered P450s, derived from promiscuous ancestors, illustrate how targeted selection can rapidly diversify enzyme functions for biotechnological applications.

Applications

Industrial Processes

Enzymes play a pivotal role in by enabling efficient, sustainable manufacturing through biocatalysis, which often reduces energy consumption and minimizes environmental impact compared to traditional chemical methods. In sectors like food production, biofuels, and pharmaceuticals, enzymes facilitate large-scale transformations of raw materials into valuable products, enhancing yield and product quality while allowing for milder reaction conditions. In the , amylases are widely employed to hydrolyze into simpler sugars, improving processing efficiency. In , α-amylases break down in to produce dextrins, resulting in better volume, texture, and by acting as antistaling agents. Similarly, in , these enzymes convert barley into fermentable sugars during , boosting yield and enabling the production of lighter beers with reduced calories through glucoamylase action on dextrins. , primarily from microbial sources, is essential for cheese production, where it hydrolyzes κ-casein in to promote and formation, accelerating and enhancing flavor development. Lipases find application in formulations to degrade lipid-based stains, improving performance in processes, though they also contribute to flavor enhancement in dairy products like cheese by liberating free fatty acids. For biofuel production, cellulases are critical in breaking down into fermentable sugars for synthesis. These enzyme cocktails, including endoglucanases, exoglucanases, and β-glucosidases, hydrolyze pretreated plant materials like , with companies such as Novonesis (formed by the 2024 merger of and ) developing optimized formulations that have contributed to reducing production costs, with minimum fuel selling prices averaging $2.65 per (range $0.90–$6.00/) as of recent analyses through improved yields and stability. In pharmaceutical manufacturing, penicillin acylase catalyzes the hydrolysis of penicillin G to produce 6-aminopenicillanic acid (6-APA), a key intermediate for semisynthetic β-lactam antibiotics like amoxicillin. This enzymatic process offers high specificity and efficiency, replacing harsher chemical methods and enabling scalable synthesis of antibiotics with minimal byproducts. To enhance economic viability, enzyme immobilization techniques are routinely applied in these industries, allowing repeated use and recovery. Adsorption involves reversible binding of enzymes to solid supports like ion-exchange resins, offering simplicity and low cost but risking desorption under operational stresses. Entrapment, by contrast, confines enzymes within polymer matrices such as alginate beads or gels, providing robust protection and high loading but potentially introducing diffusion limitations that reduce reaction rates. Key challenges include maintaining enzymatic stability against thermal denaturation, pH shifts, and mechanical shear during prolonged reuse, which can limit operational cycles and overall productivity. Engineered enzymes, optimized for such immobilization, further improve process robustness in industrial settings.

Biomedical Uses

Enzymes play a pivotal role in biomedical diagnostics through techniques that leverage their catalytic properties for sensitive detection of biomolecules. In , (HRP) is commonly conjugated to antibodies to amplify signals via chromogenic or fluorescent substrates, enabling the quantification of antigens or antibodies at picomolar levels in clinical samples such as or serum. This method has become a cornerstone for diagnosing infectious diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cancers, with HRP's high turnover rate allowing for rapid readout in under an hour. In therapeutics, enzymes are administered to replace deficient activities or target pathological processes. For , alginate lyase has been investigated as an enzyme replacement therapy to degrade alginate biofilms produced by in lung mucus, potentially improving and reducing severity in preclinical models. Similarly, thrombolytic enzymes like activate plasminogen to , dissolving clots in acute or , achieving reperfusion in approximately 65% of cases when administered promptly. These applications draw from pathological roles where enzyme dysregulation contributes to disease, informing targeted interventions. Emerging biotechnologies harness engineered enzymes for precise genetic and metabolic modifications. The CRISPR-Cas9 system utilizes the Cas9 nuclease enzyme, developed in 2012, to create targeted double-strand breaks in DNA guided by RNA, facilitating gene editing for treating genetic disorders like sickle cell disease and certain cancers in clinical trials. Directed evolution techniques iteratively mutate and select cytochrome P450 enzymes—key drug-metabolizing proteins—to enhance their specificity and stability, enabling personalized medicine applications such as detoxifying xenobiotics or optimizing prodrug activation in vivo. Despite these advances, enzyme therapeutics face challenges including and delivery barriers. Foreign enzymes can elicit responses, reducing efficacy and causing , as observed in 1.6% to 4.4% of patients receiving from major clinical trials. To mitigate this, —covalent attachment of —extends plasma from minutes to days and masks immunogenic epitopes, as demonstrated in approved therapies like pegademase for . In the 2020s, progress with mRNA-encoded enzymes, such as transient expression of via lipid nanoparticles, circumvents immunogenicity by leveraging the patient's cellular machinery, showing promise in phase I trials for liver-directed editing without persistent protein exposure, with updated data confirming safety as of 2025.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.