Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Irreligion
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Irreligion |
|---|
Irreligion is the absence or rejection of religious beliefs or practices. It encompasses a wide range of viewpoints drawn from various philosophical and intellectual perspectives, including atheism, agnosticism, religious skepticism, rationalism, secularism, and non-religious spirituality. These perspectives can vary, with individuals who identify as irreligious holding diverse beliefs about religion and its role in their lives.[1]
Relatively little scholarly research was published on irreligion until around the year 2010.[2]
Overview
[edit]Over the past several decades,[when?] the number of secular people has increased, with a rapid rise in the early 21st century, in many countries.[3][4]: 4 [1][5]: 112 [6] In virtually every high-income country and many poor countries, religion has declined.[5]: 112 Highly secular societies tend to be societally healthy and successful.[7] Social scientists have predicted declines in religious beliefs and their replacement with more scientific/naturalistic outlooks (secularization hypothesis).[8] According to Ronald Inglehart, this trend seems likely to continue and a reverse rarely lasts long because the trend is driven by technological innovation.[9] However, other researchers disagree (contra-secularization hypothesis).[8] By 2050, Pew Research Center (Pew) expects irreligious people to probably decline as a share of the world population (16.4% to 13.2%), at least for a time, because of faster population growth in highly religious countries and shrinking populations in at least some less religious countries.[1][10] Many countries may also be gradually becoming more secular, generation by generation.[10] Younger generations tend to be less religious than their elders.[10][11]: 5 They might become more religious as they age, but still be less religious than previous generations if their countries become more affluent and stable.[11]: 13 Nonetheless, secularization is compatible with religion since most versions of secularity do not lead to atheism or irreligion.[12] Religious congruence, that is consistency between beliefs and behaviors, in individuals is rare.[13]: 2 Religious incongruence is not the same thing as religious insincerity or hypocrisy.[13]: 5 The widespread religious congruence fallacy occurs when interpretations or explanations unjustifiably presume religious congruence.[13]: 19 This fallacy also infects "New Atheist" critiques of religion.[13]: 21
Estimating the number of irreligious people in the world is difficult.[14][1] Those who do not affiliate with a religion are diverse. In many countries censuses and demographic surveys do not separate atheists, agnostics and those responding "nothing in particular" as distinct populations, obscuring significant differences that may exist between them.[15]: 60 People can feel reasonable anxieties about giving a politically ‘wrong’ answer – in either direction.[14] Measurement of irreligiosity requires a high degree of cultural sensitivity, especially outside the West, where the concepts of "religion" or "the secular" are not always rooted in local culture and may not even be present.[4]: 31–34 The sharp distinction, and often antagonism, between "religious" and "secular" is culturally and historically unique to the West since in most of human history and cultures, there was little differentiation between the natural and supernatural and concepts do not always transfer across cultures.[4]: 31 Forms of secularity always reflect the societal, historical, cultural and religious contexts in which they emerge, and distinctions are sharp in religiously dominant contexts.[4]: 31 Also, there's considerable prevalence of atheism and agnosticism in ancient Asian texts.[16] Atheistic traditions have played a significant part in those cultures for millennia.[16] "Cultural religion" must be taken into account: non-religious people can be found in religious categories, especially where religion has very deep-seated religious roots in a culture.[15]: 59 Many of the religiously unaffiliated have some religious beliefs and participate in religious practices.[17][18][19][20]
In 2016, Zuckerman, Galen and Pasquale estimated there were 400 million nonreligious or nontheistic people.[21] A 2022 Gallup International Association (GIA) survey, done in 61 countries, reported that 62% of respondents said they are religious, one in four that they aren't, 10% that they're atheists and the rest are not sure.[22] In 2016, it found similar results (62%, 25%, 9% and 5%), also in 2014.[22][23]: 1 : 3 People in the European Union, East Asia and Oceania were the least religious.[22] In 2010, according to Pew, the religiously unaffiliated numbered more than 1.1 billion, about one-in-six people (16.3% of an estimated 6.9 billion).[24][18][25]: 24 : 25 76% of them resided in the 60 countries of Asia-Pacific.[18][25]: 25 : 46 : 66 China, officially an atheist state and considered to be the world's first or second most populous country,[note 1] alone held the majority (62.2% or about 700 million).[26][27]: 1 [28][1][18][25]: 25 : 46 : 66 Nevertheless, several smaller countries, especially in Europe and Asia, eclipse China's percent of residents who are irreligious with even higher proportions.[28] Shares were relatively similar in three of the six regions: Asia-Pacific (21.2% of more than 4 billion), Europe (18.2% of more than 742 thousands) and North America (17.1% of more than 344 thousands).[18][25]: 25 Men, younger people, and whites, Asians, and people of Jewish heritage are more likely to be secular.[7]
Etymology
[edit]Irreligion is either a borrowing from French or from Latin.[29] The term irreligion is a combination of the noun religion and the ir- form of the prefix in-, signifying "not" (similar to irrelevant). It was first attested in French as irréligion in 1527, then in English as irreligion in 1598. It was borrowed into Dutch as irreligie in the 17th century, though it is not certain from which language.[30]
Definition
[edit]According to the encyclopedia Britannica, the term irreligion is frequently characterized differently depending on context.[1] Sometimes, surveys of religious belief use lack of identification with a religion as a marker of irreligion.[1] This can be misleading: in some cases a person may identify with a religious cultural institution but not hold the doctrines of that institution or take part in its religious practice.[1]
Some scholars define irreligion as the active rejection of religion, as opposed to the mere absence of religion.[1] The Encyclopedia of Religion and Society defines it as: "Active rejection of religion in general or any of its more specific organized forms. It is thus distinct from the secular, which simply refers to the absence of religion. [...] In contemporary usage, it is increasingly employed as a synonym for unbelief [...]"[31][32] Sociologist Colin Campbell also describes it as "deliberate indifference towards religion", in his 1971 Towards a Sociology of Irreligion.[33]
The Oxford English Dictionary has two definitions, one of which is labelled obsolete (first published in 1900).[29] It is want of religion; hostility to or disregard of religious principles; irreligious conduct.[29]
The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines it as "the quality or state of being irreligious" and "irreligious" as "neglectful of religion: lacking religious emotions, doctrines, or practices", also "indicating lack of religion".[34]
Also for "religion", there is no universally agreed-upon definition, even within the social sciences.[4]: 15
Types
[edit]- Agnostic atheism is a philosophical position that encompasses both atheism and agnosticism. Agnostic atheists are atheistic because they do not believe in the existence of any deity and agnostic because they claim that the existence of a deity is either unknowable in principle or unknown in fact.
- Agnosticism is the view that the existence of God, the divine, and the supernatural are unknown or unknowable.
- Alatrism or alatry (Greek: from the privative ἀ- + λατρεία (latreia) = worship) is the recognition of the existence of one or more gods, but with a deliberate lack of worship of any deity. Typically, it includes the belief that religious rituals have no supernatural significance and that gods ignore all prayers and worship.
- Anti-clericalism is opposition to religious authority, typically in social or political matters.
- Antireligion is opposition to or rejection of religion of any kind.
- Antitheism is the explicit opposition to theism. The term has had a range of applications. It typically refers to direct opposition to belief in any deity.
- Apatheism is the attitude of apathy or indifference toward the existence or non-existence of any deity.
- Atheism is the lack of belief that any deities exist; in a narrower sense, positive atheism is specifically the position that there are factually no deities. There are ranges of negative and positive atheism.
- "Cultural religion"[15]: 59
- Deism is a philosophical position and rationalistic theology that rejects revelation as a source of knowledge and asserts that empirical reason and observation of the natural world are exclusively logical, reliable, and sufficient to determine the existence of a Supreme Being as the creator of the universe.
- Freethought.[4]: 14 It holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
- Ietsism is an unspecified belief in an undetermined transcendent reality.
- Ignosticism, also known as igtheism, is the idea that the question of the existence of God is meaningless because the word "God" has no coherent, unambiguous definition.
- Naturalism is the idea or belief that only natural (as opposed to supernatural or spiritual) laws and forces operate in the universe.
- New Atheism is the position of some atheist academics, writers, scientists, and philosophers of the 20th and 21st centuries, such as Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Daniel Dennett.
- Nones can be used to refer to those who are unaffiliated with any organized religion. This use derives from surveys of religious affiliation, in which "None" (or "None of the above") is typically the last choice. Since this status can be chosen because of lack of organizational affiliation or lack of personal belief, it is a more specific concept than irreligion. A 2015 Gallup, Inc. poll concluded that in the United States "nones" were growing as a percentage of the population, while Christians were declining and non-Christians also increasing but to a much lesser degree, since the 1950s.[35]
- Nontheism[4]: 14
- Post-theism is a variant of nontheism that proposes that the division of theism and atheism is obsolete and that the God-idea belongs to a stage of human development now past. Within nontheism, post-theism can be contrasted with antitheism.
- Religious skepticism is a type of skepticism about religion.
- Secular ethics is a branch of moral philosophy in which ethics is based solely on human faculties, such as logic, empathy, reason, and ethical intuition, and not derived from belief in supernatural revelation or guidance—a source of ethics in many religions.
- Secular humanism is a system of thought that prioritizes human rather than divine matters.
- Secular liberalism is a form of liberalism in which secularist principles and values, and sometimes non-religious ethics, are especially emphasized.
- Secular paganism is an outlook that upholds the virtues and principles associated with paganism while maintaining a secular worldview.
- Secularism.[3][4]: 14 It is also used to describe a political conviction in favor of minimizing religion in the public sphere that may be advocated for regardless of personal religiosity. Sometimes, especially in the United States, it is also a synonym for naturalism or atheism.[36]
- "Spiritual but not religious" (SBNR) is a designation coined by Robert C. Fuller for people who reject traditional or organized religion but have strong metaphysical beliefs. The SBNR may be included under the definition of nonreligion,[37] but are sometimes classified as a wholly distinct group.[38]
- Theological noncognitivism is the argument that religious language—specifically, words such as God—are not cognitively meaningful. It is sometimes considered synonymous with ignosticism.
- Transtheism refers to a system of thought or religious philosophy that is neither theistic nor atheistic but beyond them.
History
[edit]In the early 1970s, Colin Campbell began a sociological study of irreligion.[4]: 13
Human rights
[edit]In 1993, the United Nations Human Rights Committee declared that article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights "protects theistic, non-theistic and atheistic beliefs, as well as the right not to profess any religion or belief."[39] The committee further stated that "the freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief necessarily entails the freedom to choose a religion or belief, including the right to replace one's current religion or belief with another or to adopt atheistic views." Signatories to the convention are barred from "the use of threat of physical force or penal sanctions to compel believers or non-believers" to recant their beliefs or convert.[40][41]
Most democracies protect the freedom of religion or belief, and it is largely implied in respective legal systems that those who do not believe or observe any religion are allowed freedom of thought.
A noted exception to ambiguity, explicitly allowing non-religion, is Article 36 of the Constitution of China (as adopted in 1982), which states that "No state organ, public organization or individual may compel citizens to believe in, or not believe in, any religion; nor may they discriminate against citizens who believe in, or do not believe in, any religion."[42] Article 46 of China's 1978 Constitution was even more explicit, stating that "Citizens enjoy freedom to believe in religion and freedom not to believe in religion and to propagate atheism."[43]
Demographics
[edit]
Women, when in the labor force, are similar to men in their religiosity. When out of the labor force, women tend to be more religious.[45]
In many countries censuses and demographic surveys do not separate atheists, agnostics and those responding "nothing in particular" as distinct populations.[15]: 60 Both "religion" and "secular" are Western concepts and are not universal across cultures, languages, or time.[46]
In 2020, of the global atheist and non-religious population, 78% live in Asia and the Pacific, while the remainder reside in Europe (10%), North America (6%), Latin America and the Caribbean (4%), sub-Saharan Africa (1.5%) and the Middle East and North Africa (.1%).[47] Eleven countries have nonreligious majorities. In 2020, the countries with the highest percentage of "Non-Religious" ("Term encompassing both (a) agnostics; and (b) atheists") were North Korea, the Czech Republic and Estonia.[48] According to the 2018 Chinese General Social Survey, China had the largest count of unaffiliated people: about one billion adults.[49] According to Pew Research in 2025, China alone makes up 67% of the global religiously unaffiliated demographic.[50] Some broadly religious practices continue to play a significant role in the lives of a substantial shares of the Chinese population.[49] The Asia-Pacific region alone accounts for 78% of the global unaffliated demographic.[50]
Determining objective irreligion, as part of societal or individual levels of secularity and religiosity, requires a high degree of cultural sensitivity from researchers. This is especially so outside the Western world, where the concepts of "religious" and "secular" are not necessarily rooted in local culture or even exist.[4]: 31–34 "Cultural religion" is a vivid reality.[15]: 59 It must be taken into account when trying to ascertain the numeric strength of atheism and agnosticism in a country.[15]: 59 It is generally not considered more important than self-identification measures.[15]: 59 Non-religious people can be found in religious categories.[15]: 59 And many of the unafflilated still hold religious beliefs or practices.[17][20][19] This is especially the case where religion has very deep-seated religious roots in a culture, such as with Christianity in Europe, Islam in the Middle East, Hinduism in India, and Buddhism in South-east Asia.[15]: 59 For instance, Scandinavian countries have among the highest measures of nonreligiosity and even atheism in Europe. For example, 58% of the Swedish population identify with the Church of Sweden.[51] Yet, 47% of atheists who live in those countries are still formally members of the national churches.[52] In much of East Asia, ritual behavior holds greater salience than belief.[4]: 31 China has state atheism and is a Leninist religious state, which maintains dominance over all other religions.[1][26][27]: 1 About 85% of its population practice various kinds of religious behaviors with some regularity.[27]: 2 Many East Asians identify as "without religion" (wú zōngjiào in Chinese, mu shūkyō in Japanese, mu jong-gyo in Korean), but "religion" in that context refers only to Buddhism or Christianity. Most of the people "without religion" practice Shinto and other folk religions. In the Muslim world, those who claim to be "not religious" mostly imply not strictly observing Islam, and in Israel, being "secular" means not strictly observing Orthodox Judaism. Vice versa, many American Jews share the worldviews of nonreligious people though affiliated with a Jewish denomination, and in Russia, growing identification with Eastern Orthodoxy is mainly motivated by cultural and nationalist considerations, without much concrete belief.[53] In the United States, the majority of the "Nones", those without a religious affiliation, have belief in a god or higher power, spiritual forces beyond the natural world, and souls.[54] Even 23% of self-identified atheists believe in a higher power, but not a god as described in the bible.[55] A 2024 report by Pew on Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam found that though many in those countries are not affiliated with any religion, many of the unaffiliated still have beliefs in gods or unseen beings and engage in religious practices.[19] According to Pew in 2023, many unaffilaited Chinese believe in deities or other religious beliefs and participate in religious practicies.[49][56]
Secular people are complex and not always devoid of religious or spiritual involvement.[57] They persist in various forms of religiosity and spirituality.[58] "Secular churches" or "atheist churches" such as Sunday Assembly and others have emerged in multiple countries (e.g. USA, Britain, Australia) which deal with community needs that religious services often provide.[59][60][61][62] Atheists are diverse with some engaging spiritual practice and others having strong beliefs in that they seek to evangelize to others.[63] Nontheistic religions such as Buddhism, Jainism, along with atheistic schools in Hinduism, and other Indian schools like Carvaka, Ajivika have played a significant part in Asian cultures for millennia.[16] Anthropologist Jack David Eller states that "atheism is quite a common position, even within religion" and that "surprisingly, atheism is not the opposite or lack, let alone the enemy, of religion but is the most common form of religion."[64] In the Czech Republic, one of the most secular countries in the world, most nonbelievers are not atheists but are more religious skeptics fulfil their spiritual needs outside of traditional religion.[65]
In 2016, Zuckerman, Galen and Pasquale estimated there were 400 million nonreligious or nontheistic people.[21] In their 2013 essay, Ariela Keysar and Juhem Navarro-Rivera estimated there were about 450 to 500 million nonbelievers, including both "positive" and "negative" atheists, or approximately 7% of the world population.[66] These estimates come from the International Social Survey Programme 2008 survey in which 40 countries took part.[67] In 2010, the religiously unaffiliated numbered more than 1.1 billion (around 1,126,500,000 persons), about one-in-six people (16.3% of an estimated 6,9 billion world population), according to Pew Research Center.[24][18][25]: 24 : 25 In Pew reports, "unaffiliated" are atheists, agnostics, and people who checked "nothing in particular".[15]: 60 76% of them resided in one of the six regions: Asia-Pacific.[18][25]: 25 A 2012 WIN/Gallup International report on a poll from 57 countries reported that 59% of the world's population identified as a religious person, 23% as not a religious person, 13% as "convinced atheists", and also a 9% decrease in identification as "religious" when compared to the 2005 average from 39 countries.[68] A 2015 WIN/Gallup International poll found that 63% of the globe identified as a religious person, 22% as not a religious person, and 11% as "convinced atheists".[69] Their 2016 survey found that 62% of the globe identified as a religious person, less than 25% as not a religious person, 9% others as "convinced atheists" and 5% others "Do not know/no response".[23] Keysar and Navarro-Rivera advised caution with these figures since other surveys have consistently reached lower figures for the number of atheists worldwide.[70]: 553 : 554
Inverse association between intelligence and religiosity, and the inverse correlation between intelligence and fertility might lead to a decline in non-religious identity (contra-secularization hypothesis) in the foreseeable future.[8][71]: 2 In 2007, sociologist Phil Zuckerman's global studies on atheism have indicated that global atheism may be in decline due to irreligious countries having the lowest birth rates in the world and religious countries having higher birth rates in general.[72] A Pew 2015 global projection study for religion and nonreligion, projected that between 2010 and 2050, there will be some initial increases of the unaffiliated followed by a decline by 2050.[73] Some theorists think religion will fade away but Pew reveals a more complicated picture.[10] Pew predicts the unaffiliated share of the world population will decrease, at least for a while, from 16.4% to 13.2% by 2050.[74][10] Pew states that religious areas are experiencing the fastest growth because of higher fertility and younger populations.[10][75] By 2060, Pew says the number of unaffiliated will increase by over 35 million, but the overall population-percentage will decrease to 13% because the total population will grow faster.[76][77] This would be mostly because of relatively old age and low fertility rates in less religious societies such as East Asia, particularly China and Japan, but also Western Europe.[74][1] By 2019, 43 out of 49 countries studied continued to become less religious.[5]: 110 [6]
Relatively few unbelievers select ‘Atheist’ or ‘Agnostic’ as their preferred (non)religious or secular identity.[78]: 3 Being nonreligious is not necessarily equivalent to being an atheist or agnostic. Many of the nonreligious have some religious beliefs.[18][25]: 24 Also, some of the unaffiliated engage in certain kinds of religious practices.[18][25]: 24 For example, "belief in God or a higher power is shared by 7% of Chinese unaffiliated adults, 30% of French unaffiliated adults and 68% of unaffiliated U.S. adults.[18][25]: 24 Being unaffiliated with a religion on polls does not automatically mean objectively nonreligious since there are, for example, unaffiliated people who fall under religious measures, just as some unbelievers may still attend a church or other place of worship.[15][pages needed] Out of the global nonreligious population, 76.2% reside in Asia-Pacific, while the remainder reside in Europe (12%), North America (5.2%), Latin America and the Caribbean (4%), sub-Saharan Africa (2.4%) and the Middle East and North Africa (0.2%).[18][25]: 24
By population
[edit]The Pew Research Center in the table below reflects "religiously unaffiliated" in 2010 which "include atheists, agnostics, and people who do not identify with any particular religion in surveys".
The Zuckerman data on the table below only reflect the number of people who have an absence of belief in a deity only (atheists, agnostics). These do not include the broader number of people who do not identify with a particular religion, such as deists, pantheists, and spiritual but not religious people.
| Country | Pew (2012)[18] | Zuckerman (2004)[79][80] |
|---|---|---|
| 700,680,000 | 103,907,840 – 181,838,720 | |
| 102,870,000 | ||
| 72,120,000 | 81,493,120 – 82,766,450 | |
| 26,040,000 | 66,978,900 | |
| 23,180,000 | 34,507,680 – 69,015,360 | |
| 20,350,000 | 33,794,250 – 40,388,250 | |
| 17,580,000 | 25,982,320 – 32,628,960 | |
| 18,684,010 – 26,519,240 | ||
| 22,350,000 | 14,579,400 – 25,270,960 | |
| 9,546,400 | ||
| 50,980,000 | 8,790,840 – 26,822,520 | |
| 6,364,020 – 7,179,920 | ||
| 6,176,520 – 9,752,400 | ||
| 6,042,150 – 9,667,440 | ||
| 5,460,000 | ||
| 5,240,000 | ||
| 5,328,940 – 6,250,121 | ||
| 4,779,120 – 4,978,250 | ||
| 4,346,160 – 4,449,640 | ||
| 4,133,560 – 7,638,100 | ||
| 3,483,420 – 8,708,550 | ||
| 17,350,000 | 3,404,700 | |
| 3,210,240 – 4,614,720 | ||
| 2,556,120 – 3,007,200 | ||
| 2,327,590 – 4,330,400 | ||
| 1,956,990 - 6,320,550 | ||
| 1,752,870 | ||
| 1,703,680 | ||
| 1,665,840 – 1,817,280 | ||
| 1,565,800 – 3,131,600 | ||
| 1,471,500 – 2,125,500 | ||
| 1,460,200 – 3,129,000 | ||
| 1,418,250 – 3,294,000 | ||
| 1,266,670 – 2,011,770 | ||
| 929,850 – 2,293,630 | ||
| 798,800 – 878,680 | ||
| 791,630 | ||
| 703,850 – 764,180 | ||
| 657,580 | ||
| 618,380 | ||
| 566,020 | ||
| 542,400 – 1,518,720 | ||
| 469,040 | ||
| 461,200 – 668,740 | ||
| 420,960 – 947,160 | ||
| 118,740 | ||
| 407,880 | ||
| 355,670 | ||
| 314,790 | ||
| 283,600 | ||
| 247,590 | ||
| 47,040 – 67,620 | ||
| 15,410,000 |
Historical trends
[edit]
Since 2007, there has been a sharp trend away from religion.[6][5] From about 2007 to 2019, 43 out of 49 countries studied became less religious.[6] Past influential thinkers from Karl Marx to Max Weber to Émile Durkheim thought that the spread of scientific knowledge would dispel religion throughout the world.[5]: 112 Industrialization also didn't cause religion to disappear.[5]: 110 Political scientists Ronald Inglehart and Pippa Norris argue faith is "more emotional than cognitive", and both advance an alternative thesis termed "existential security." They postulate that rather than knowledge or ignorance of scientific learning, it is the weakness or vulnerability of a society that determines religiosity. They claim that increased poverty and chaos make religious values more important to a society, while wealth and security diminish its role. As need for religious support diminishes, there is less willingness to "accept its constraints, including keeping women in the kitchen and gay people in the closet".[81]
Prior to the 1980s
[edit]Rates of people identifying as non-religious began rising in most societies at least as early as the turn of the 20th century.[82] In 1968, sociologist Glenn M. Vernon wrote that US census respondents who identified as "no religion" were insufficiently defined because they were defined in terms of a negative. He contrasted the label with the term "independent" for political affiliation, which still includes people who participate in civic activities. He suggested this difficulty in definition was partially due to the dilemma of defining religious activity beyond membership, attendance, or other identification with a formal religious group.[82] During the 1970s, social scientists still tended to describe irreligion from a perspective that considered religion as normative for humans. Irreligion was described in terms of hostility, reactivity, or indifference toward religion or as developing from radical theologies.[83]
1981–2019
[edit]This section relies largely or entirely upon a single source. (July 2022) |
In a study of religious trends in 49 countries (they contained 60 percent of the world’s population) from 1981 to 2007, Inglehart and Norris found an overall, but not universal, increase in religiosity.[5]: 110 Respondents in 33 of 49 countries rated themselves higher on a scale from one to ten when asked how important God was in their lives. This increase occurred in most former communist and developing countries. Most high-income countries became less religious.[5]: 112 A sharp reversal of the global trend occurred from 2007 to 2019, when 43 out of 49 countries studied became less religious. This reversal appeared across most of the world.[5] The decline in belief was not confined to high-income countries and appeared across most of the world.[6] In virtually every high-income country, religion has continued to decline.[5]: 112 At the same time, many poor countries, together with most of the former communist states, have also become less religious.[5]: 112 From 2007 to 2019, only five countries became more religious, whereas the vast majority of the countries studied moved in the opposite direction.[5]: 112 India is the most important exception to the general pattern of declining religiosity.[5]: 112 The United States was a dramatic example of declining religiosity – with the mean rating of importance of religion dropping from 8.2 to 4.6 – while India was a major exception. Research in 1989 recorded disparities in religious adherence for different faith groups, with people from Christian and tribal traditions leaving religion at a greater rate than those from Muslim, Hindu, or Buddhist faiths.[84]
Inglehart and Norris speculate that the decline in religiosity comes from a decline in the social need for traditional gender and sexual norms, ("virtually all world religions instilled" pro-fertility norms such as "producing as many children as possible and discouraged divorce, abortion, homosexuality, contraception, and any sexual behavior not linked to reproduction" in their adherents for centuries) as life expectancy rose and infant mortality dropped. They also argue that the idea that religion was necessary to prevent a collapse of social cohesion and public morality was belied by lower levels of corruption and murder in less religious countries. They argue that both of these trends are based on the theory that as societies develop, survival becomes more secure: starvation, once pervasive, becomes uncommon; life expectancy increases; murder and other forms of violence diminish. As this level of security rises, there is less social/economic need for the high birthrates that religion encourages and less emotional need for the comfort of religious belief.[5] Change in acceptance of "divorce, abortion, and homosexuality" has been measured by the World Values Survey and shown to have grown throughout the world outside of Muslim-majority countries.[5] Several very comprehensive surveys in the Middle East and Iran have come to similar conclusions: there is an increase in secularization and growing calls for reforms in religious political institutions.[85]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Depending on whether or not the special administrative regions of Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan are included in the population statistics of China. The table in the transcluded source excludes all three, referring to the population of Mainland China only.
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Eldridge, Stephen. "irreligion". In Duignan, Brian (ed.). Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Archived from the original on 1 September 2024. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
- ^ "Resources Overview". Explaining Atheism. Queen's University Belfast. 15 January 2025. Retrieved 15 January 2025.
- ^ a b "The Nonreligious: Understanding Secular People and Societies". Oxford Academic. Oxford University Press. 2016. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199924950.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-992495-0. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Zuckerman, Phil; Galen, Luke W.; Pasquale, Frank L. (24 March 2016). The Nonreligious: Understanding Secular People and Societies. Oxford University Press. p. 226. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199924950.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-992495-0. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Inglehart, Ronald F. (11 August 2020). "Giving Up on God: The Global Decline of Religion". Foreign Affairs. pp. 110–118. Archived from the original on 22 September 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
- ^ a b c d e Inglehart, Ronald (20 February 2021). "Giving Up on God: The Global Decline of Religion - Revisited". World Values Survey. World Values Survey Association. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
- ^ a b "Conclusion". Oxford Academic. Oxford University Press. 2016. pp. 223–226. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199924950.003.0012. ISBN 978-0-19-992495-0. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
- ^ a b c Ellis, Lee; Hoskin, Anthony W.; Dutton, Edward; Nyborg, Helmuth (8 March 2017). "The Future of Secularism: a Biologically Informed Theory Supplemented with Cross-Cultural Evidence". Evolutionary Psychological Science. 3 (3): 224–242. doi:10.1007/s40806-017-0090-z. Retrieved 22 December 2024.
- ^ Inglehart, Ronald (10 December 2020). "Religion's Sudden Decline: Why It's Happening and What Comes Next". Center for Political Studies (CPS). University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f "Key Findings From the Global Religious Futures Project". Pew Research Center. 21 December 2022. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
- ^ a b Hackett, Conrad (13 June 2018). "The Age Gap in Religion Around the World" (PDF). Pew Research Center. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
- ^ Eller, Jack (2010). "What is Atheism?". In Zuckerman, Phil (ed.). Atheism and Secularity. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praeger. pp. 12–13. ISBN 9780313351839.
- ^ a b c d Chaves, Mark (March 2010). "Rain Dances in the Dry Season: Overcoming the Religious Congruence Fallacy". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 49 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01489.x.
- ^ a b Bullivant, Stephen (2021). "59 - Atheism Throughout the World". The Cambridge History of Atheism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1095–1112. doi:10.1017/9781108562324.060. ISBN 978-1-108-56232-4.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Johnson, Todd; Zurlo, Gina (2016). "Unaffiliated, Yet Religious: A Methodological and Demographic Analysis". In Cipriani, Roberto; Garelli, Franco (eds.). Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion: Volume 7: Sociology of Atheism. Leiden: Brill Publishers. pp. 50–74. ISBN 9789004317536. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
- ^ a b c Cohen, Signe (1 April 2019). "Atheism has been part of many Asian traditions for millennia". The Conversation. The Conversation Media Group Ltd. Retrieved 22 December 2024.
This article incorporates text by Signe Cohen available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
- ^ a b "4. Religiously Unaffiliated Population Change". Pew Research Center. 9 June 2025.
What do the religiously unaffiliated believe? The religiously unaffiliated aren't necessarily devoid of religious beliefs and practices. Research shows that many people who don't belong to a religious group may still hold religious or spiritual beliefs and participate in religious or spiritual activities.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "Religiously Unaffiliated". The Global Religious Landscape: A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’s Major Religious Groups as of 2010. Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. 18 December 2012. Archived from the original on 9 July 2024. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
- ^ a b c Lesage, Jonathan Evans, Alan Cooperman, Kelsey Jo Starr, Manolo Corichi, William Miner and Kirsten (17 June 2024). "Religion and Spirituality in East Asian Societies". Pew Research Center.
A survey in Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and neighboring Vietnam finds many people don't identify with a religion but say they believe in unseen beings, venerate ancestors' spirits and engage in ritual practices.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Evans, Jonathan (17 June 2024). "6 facts about Religion and Spirituality in East Asian societies". Pew Research Center.
Table - Few East Asians consider religion very important in their lives but many believe in god or unseen things
- ^ a b Zuckerman, Phil; Galen, Luke W.; Pasquale, Frank L. (March 2016). "Secularity around the World". Oxford Academic. Oxford University Press. pp. 30–52. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199924950.003.0003. ISBN 978-0-19-992495-0. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
- ^ a b c "More Prone to Believe in God than Identify as Religious. More Likely to Believe in Heaven than in Hell". Gallup International Association. 4 December 2023. Retrieved 9 December 2024.
- ^ a b "Religion prevails in the world" (PDF). WIN/Gallup International. p. 9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 November 2017. Retrieved 9 December 2024.
- ^ a b "The Global Religious Landscape". The Global Religious Landscape: A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’s Major Religious Groups as of 2010. Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. 18 December 2012. Archived from the original on 26 December 2018. Retrieved 4 November 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Hackett, Conrad; Grim, Brian J. (December 2012). "Religiously Unaffiliated" (PDF). The Global Religious Landscape:A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’s Major Religious Groups as of 2010. Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. p. 82. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
- ^ a b Zuckerman, Phil; Shook, John R., eds. (2017). "15 Sacred, Secular, and Neosacred Governments in China and Taiwan". Oxford Academic. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988457.013.16. ISBN 978-0-19-998845-7. Retrieved 22 December 2024.
- ^ a b c Kuo, Cheng-tian (2017). "15. Sacred, Secular, and Neo-sacred Governments in China and Taiwan". In Zuckerman, Phil; Shook, John (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Secularism. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199988457. Retrieved 22 December 2024.
- ^ a b "Least Religious Countries 2024". World Population Review. Retrieved 9 December 2024.
- ^ a b c "irreligion". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
- ^ "Irreligie". Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie. Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal. 2007. Archived from the original on 29 January 2019. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
- ^ Campbell, Colin (1998). "Irreligion". In Swatos, William H. Jr. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press. p. 239. ISBN 0-7619-8956-0. OCLC 37361790.
- ^ Campbell, Colin. "Irreligion". In Swatos, William H. Jr. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. Hartford Institute for Religion Research: AltaMira Press. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
- ^ Mc Bennett, Padraig (31 January 2024). "Increasing irreligious trends among a younger demographic in Ireland: are there potential benefits?". International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church. 23 (4). Taylor & Francis: 365–381. doi:10.1080/1474225X.2023.2292397. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
- ^ "Definition of IRRELIGIOUS". www.merriam-webster.com. 18 April 2025. Retrieved 27 April 2025.
- ^ Newport, Frank (24 December 2015). "Percentage of Christians in U.S. Drifting Down, but Still High". Gallup. Archived from the original on 6 January 2024. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
- ^ Jacques Berlinerblau, How to be Secular: A Call to Arms for Religious Freedom (2012, Houghton-Mifflin Harcourt). p. 53.
- ^ Zuckerman, Galen et al., p. 119.
- ^ Zuckerman, Shook, (in bibliography), p. 575.
- ^ "CCPR General Comment 22: 30/07/93 on ICCPR Article 18". Minority Rights Group. Archived from the original on 16 January 2015.
- ^ "Discrimination against religious minorities in Iran" (PDF). International Federation for Human Rights. 1 August 2003. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 October 2006. Retrieved 3 March 2009.
- ^ Davis, Derek H. "The Evolution of Religious Liberty as a Universal Human Right: Examining the Role of the 1981 United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief" (PDF). BYU Law Review. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 3 March 2009.
- ^ "Chapter two – the fundamental rights and duties of citizens". Constitution of the People's Republic of China. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor. Archived from the original on 23 March 2018. Retrieved 9 June 2013.
- ^ 中华人民共和国宪法 (1978年) [People's Republic of China 1978 Constitution] (in Chinese). 1978. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021 – via Wikisource.
- ^ "Religious Composition by Country, 2010–2050". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. 2 April 2015. Archived from the original on 5 April 2019. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
- ^ Bullard, Gabe (22 April 2016). "The World's Newest Major Religion: No Religion". National Geographic. National Geographic Society. Retrieved 9 December 2024.
- ^ Eller, David (2017). "Varieties of Secular Experience". The Oxford Handbook of Secularism. Oxford University Press: 500–501, 512.
It is commonplace today to note that the term "secular" is of Western origin—and not originally antagonistic to religion ("secular priests" were hardly averse to religion). Frankly, "secular" is not inherently related to religion at all: denoting "of the current age" or "of the present generation," it could apply to any subject...Some societies, as anthropology has discovered, do not even have a term or concept for "religion" and therefore obviously do not have a concept akin to our "secular." For the purposes of the present chapter, they do not have "secular experience" at all, since "the secular"—like religion—is nowhere and everywhere...What investigators can and should do is discover how particular groups, institutions, and societies talk about and practice secularism—if in fact they do at all—rather than to impose a speciously unified concept, derived from one society's experience, on all places and times.
- ^ Fahmy, Conrad Hackett, Marcin Stonawski, Yunping Tong, Stephanie Kramer, Anne Shi and Dalia (9 June 2025). "Religiously Unaffiliated Population Change". Pew Research Center.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "World Religion". Association of Religion Data Archives. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
- ^ a b c Hackett, Conrad (30 August 2023). "Is China a religious country or not? It's a tricky question to answer". Pew Research Center. The Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
Yet religion still permeates the everyday lives of many Chinese people who do not claim a religion. Among the total population, minority shares say they believe in religious figures and supernatural forces. But most Chinese people engage in practices premised on belief in unseen forces and spirits. Chinese people, in other words, are more religious in their practices than in their identities or beliefs...Based on common survey measures of formal religion (zongjiao), China is not a very religious country. In fact, based on the ideology of the ruling Chinese Community Party, China is an atheist nation. And yet, based on common behaviors, China is a country in which religion, broadly understood, continues to play a significant role in the lives of a large share of the population.
- ^ a b Fahmy, Conrad Hackett, Marcin Stonawski, Yunping Tong, Stephanie Kramer, Anne Shi and Dalia (9 June 2025). "Religiously Unaffiliated Population Change". Pew Research Center.
As of 2020, the majority of people with no religious affiliation live in the Asia-Pacific region, mostly in China. (The Chinese government promotes atheism.. About 78% of all religiously unaffiliated people worldwide reside in the Asia-Pacific region, down from 83% in 2010...China is home to 67% of the world's religiously unaffiliated people
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Svenska kyrkan i siffror". www.svenskakyrkan.se (in Swedish). 11 November 2024. Archived from the original on 1 November 2017. Retrieved 30 November 2024.
- ^ Zuckerman, Phil, ed. (2010). "Ch. 9 Atheism And Secularity: The Scandinavian Paradox". Atheism and Secularity Vol.2. Praeger. p. 191. ISBN 978-0313351815.
- ^ Zuckerman, Galen et al., "Secularity Around the World". pp. 30–32, 37–40, 44, 50–51.
- ^ "Are all religiously unaffiliated adults in the US nonbelievers?". Pew Research Center. 24 January 2024. Archived from the original on 28 January 2024.
Not all 'nones' are nonbelievers. Far from it. While the "nones" include many nonbelievers, 70% of "nones" say they believe in God or another higher power, and 63% say they believe in spiritual forces beyond the natural world...Roughly two-thirds of "nones" say they think humans have souls or spirits in addition to their physical bodies. This includes 60% of agnostics and 78% of U.S. adults whose religion is "nothing in particular." By comparison, 31% of atheists believe a person has a soul or spirit in addition to a body.
- ^ Lipka, Michael; Tevington, Patricia; Starr, Kelsey (7 February 2024). "8 facts about Atheists". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on 10 May 2024.
About three-quarters of U.S. atheists (77%) do not believe in God or a higher power or in a spiritual force of any kind, according to our summer 2023 survey. At the same time, 23% say they do believe in a higher power of some kind, though fewer than 1% of U.S. atheists say they believe in "God as described in the Bible." This shows that not all self-described atheists fit the literal definition of "atheist," which is "a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods," according to Merriam-Webster.
- ^ Nadeem, Reem (30 August 2023). "Non-religion in China". Pew Research Center.
Nearly 4 in 10 Chinese believe in one or more deities..In China, many adults without zongjiao [religious] affiliation engage in traditional religious beliefs and practices.
- ^ Blankholm, Joseph (2022). The Secular Paradox : On the Religiosity of the Not Religious. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 9781479809509.
- ^ Fuller, Robert C. (2017). "Secular Spirituality". The Oxford Handbook of Secularism. Oxford University Press: 571–586.
- ^ Frost, Jacqui (11 January 2024). "Inside the "secular churches" that fill a need for some nonreligious Americans - CBS News". www.cbsnews.com. CBS News.
- ^ Sanburn, Josh (24 July 2014). "Atheist "Churches" Gain Popularity—Even in the Bible Belt". TIME.
- ^ Wheeler, Brian (4 February 2013). "What happens at an atheist church?". BBC News.
- ^ Winter, Caroline (9 November 2013). "Church for atheists comes to Australia". ABC News.
- ^ Frost, Jacqui (2021). "Religion for Atheists? Transhumanism, Mindfulness, and Atheist Churches". The Cambridge History of Atheism. Cambridge University Press: 1080–1094.
- ^ Eller, Jack (2010). "1. What Is Atheism?". In Phil Zuckerman (ed.). Atheism and Secularity Vol.1: Issues, Concepts, Definitions. Praeger. ISBN 9780313351839.
- ^ Furstova, Jana; Malinakova, Klara; Sigmundova, Dagmar; Tavel, Peter (2 October 2021). "Czech Out the Atheists: A Representative Study of Religiosity in the Czech Republic". The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 31 (4): 288–306. doi:10.1080/10508619.2020.1844967.
According to Nesporova and Nespor (2009), those Czechs who do not identify themselves with any church or who refuse to answer the question (in the national census) about their religious beliefs tend to have supernatural beliefs. Even among religiously unaffiliated Czechs, 52% believe in at least one of the following concepts: the existence of the soul (44%), fate (43%), miracles (37%), heaven (27%), magic, sorcery or witchcraft (24%), reincarnation (23%), the evil eye (21%) or hell (19%) (Evans, 2017). According to Janu et al. (2018), secular Czechs do not distinguish between God and evil spirits and perceive them jointly as supernatural forces. Overall, Czechs are much more likely to believe in the existence of the soul and fate than they are to believe in God (Evans, 2017). For Czechs, their search for spirituality can be referred to as "believing without belonging", very often even accompanied by strong anti-church feelings (Davie, 2000; Luzny & Navratilova, 2001; Nespor, 2004). This even results in people declaring themselves nonbelievers, even though they simply mean that they are not church members (Nespor, 2004; Vaclavik, 2014)."(289-290)...The authors have shown that the respondents' religious upbringing is a very important factor in their present religious beliefs. The link between the religiosity of the respondents and their sociodemographic characteristics is not very strong, except for education. A high percentage of Czech believers are not members of a church and seldom attend religious services or pray. They resemble Christians in Western Europe in their practice and in their views. The authors also argue that Czech nonbelievers are actually not atheists; they are just religious skeptics who tend to fulfil their spiritual needs outside traditional religion.
- ^ "36 A World of Atheism: Global Demographics". Oxford Academic. Oxford University Press. 2013. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.011. ISBN 978-0-19-964465-0. Retrieved 9 December 2024.
- ^ "Book Chapter The Oxford Handbook of Atheism". Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI). 31 January 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2024.
- ^ "Global Index of Religion and Atheism" (PDF). WIN/Gallup International. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 October 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2015.
- ^ "Losing our Religion? Two Thirds of People Still Claim to be Religious" (PDF). WIN/Gallup International. 13 April 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 April 2015.
- ^ Keysar, Ariela; Navarro-Rivera, Juhem (1 October 2013). "36. A World of Atheism: Global Demographics". In Bullivant, Stephen; Ruse, Michael (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 553–586. ISBN 978-0199644650. Retrieved 9 December 2024.
- ^ Ellis, Lee; Hoskin, Anthony W.; Dutton, Edward; Nyborg, Helmuth (8 March 2017). "The Future of Secularism: a Biologically Informed Theory Supplemented with Cross-Cultural Evidence". Evolutionary Psychological Science. 3 (3): 224–242. doi:10.1007/s40806-017-0090-z. Retrieved 7 December 2024.
- ^ Zuckerman, Phil (2007). Martin, Michael (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge Univ. Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0521603676.
- ^ "The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010–2050". Pew Research Center. 5 April 2012. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 18 May 2015.
- ^ a b Lipka, Michael (2 April 2015). "7 key changes in the global religious landscape". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on 19 January 2022. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
- ^ "The Age Gap in Religion Around the World". Pew Research Center. 13 June 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2024.
- ^ "Why People With No Religion Are Projected To Decline As A Share Of The World's Population". Pew Research Center. 7 April 2017. Archived from the original on 1 July 2015. Retrieved 29 June 2015.
- ^ "The Changing Global Religious Landscape: Babies Born to Muslims will Begin to Outnumber Christian Births by 2035; People with No Religion Face a Birth Dearth". Pew Research Center. 5 April 2017. Archived from the original on 6 April 2017. Retrieved 2 June 2018.
- ^ Bullivant, Stephen; Farias, Miguel; Lanman, Jonathan; Lee, Lois (28 May 2019). "Understanding Unbelief Atheists and agnostics around the world" (PDF). University of Kent. St Mary's University, Twickenham. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
- ^ "The Cambridge Companion to Atheism". PDF Drive. Archived from the original on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
- ^ "81-F77-Aeb-A404-447-C-8-B95-Dd57-Adc11-E98". Archived from the original on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
- ^ Ikenberry, G. John (November–December 2004). "Book review. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide". Foreign Affairs. 83 (November/December 2004). doi:10.2307/20034150. JSTOR 20034150. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
- ^ a b Vernon, Glenn M. (1968). "The Religious "Nones": A Neglected Category". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 7 (2): 219–229. doi:10.2307/1384629. JSTOR 1384629.
- ^ Schumaker, John F. (1992). Religion and Mental Health. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 54. ISBN 0-19-506985-4.
- ^ Duke, James T.; Johnson, Barry L. (1989). "The Stages of Religious Transformation: A Study of 200 Nations". Review of Religious Research. 30 (3): 209–224. doi:10.2307/3511506. JSTOR 3511506.
- ^ Holleis, Jennifer (2 April 2021). "Middle East: Are people losing their religion?". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 14 December 2024.
Bibliography
[edit]- Coleman, Thomas J.; Hood, Ralph W.; Streib, Heinz (2018). "An introduction to atheism, agnosticism, and nonreligious worldviews". Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. 10 (3): 203–206. doi:10.1037/rel0000213. S2CID 149580199. Archived from the original on 19 June 2021. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
- Arie Johan Vanderjagt, Richard Henry Popkin, ed. (1993). Scepticism and irreligion in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-09596-0.
- Eric Wright (2010). Irreligion: Thought, Rationale, History. BiblioBazaar. ISBN 978-1-171-06863-1.
- Dillon, Michele (2015). "Christian Affiliation and Disaffiliation in the United States: Generational and Cultural Change". In Hunt, Stephen J. (ed.). Handbook of Global Contemporary Christianity: Themes and Developments in Culture, Politics, and Society. Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion. Vol. 10. Leiden: Brill Publishers. pp. 346–365. doi:10.1163/9789004291027_019. ISBN 978-90-04-26538-7. ISSN 1874-6691.
- Eller, Jack David (2010). "What Is Atheism?". In Zuckerman, Phil (ed.). Atheism and Secularity. Volume 1: Issues, Concepts, Definitions. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger. pp. 1–18. ISBN 978-0-313-35183-9.
- ——— (2017). "Varieties of Secular Experience". In Zuckerman, Phil; Shook, John R. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Secularism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 499ff. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988457.013.31. ISBN 978-0-19-998845-7.
- Glasner, Peter E. (1977). The Sociology of Secularisation: A Critique of a Concept. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN 978-0-7100-8455-2.
- Iversen, Hans Raun (2013). "Secularization, Secularity, Secularism". In Runehov, Anne L. C.; Oviedo, Lluis (eds.). Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 2116–2121. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1024. ISBN 978-1-4020-8265-8.
- Josephson, Jason Ānanda (2012). The Invention of Religion in Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226412337.
- Lois Lee, Secular or nonreligious? Investigating and interpreting generic 'not religious' categories and populations Archived 28 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Religion, Vol. 44, no. 3. October 2013.
- Mullins, Mark R. (2011). "Religion in Contemporary Japanese Lives". In Lyon Bestor, Victoria; Bestor, Theodore C.; Yamagata, Akiko (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Japanese Culture and Society. Abingdon, England: Routledge. pp. 63–74. ISBN 978-0-415-43649-6.
- Schaffner, Caleb; Cragun, Ryan T. (2020). "Chapter 20: Non-Religion and Atheism". In Enstedt, Daniel; Larsson, Göran; Mantsinen, Teemu T. (eds.). Handbook of Leaving Religion. Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion. Vol. 18. Leiden: Brill Publishers. pp. 242–252. doi:10.1163/9789004331471_021. ISBN 978-90-04-33092-4. ISSN 1874-6691. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 29 May 2021.
- Smith, James K. A. (2014). How (Not) to Be Secular: Reading Charles Tayor. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. ISBN 978-0-8028-6761-2.
- Taylor, Charles (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0-674-02676-6.
- ——— (2011). "Why We Need a Radical Redefinition of Secularism". In Mendieta, Eduardo; VanAntwerpen, Jonathan (eds.). The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 34–59. ISBN 978-0-231-52725-5. JSTOR 10.7312/butl15645.6.
- Warner, Michael; VanAntwerpen, Jonathan; Calhoun, Craig, eds. (2010). Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-04857-7.
- Zuckerman, Phil; Galen, Luke W.; Pasquale, Frank L. (2016). "Secularity Around the World". The Nonreligious: Understanding Secular People and Societies. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199924950.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-992494-3.
- Zuckerman, Phil; Shook, John R. (2017). "Introduction: The Study of Secularism". In Zuckerman, Phil; Shook, John R. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Secularism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–17. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988457.013.1. ISBN 978-0-19-998845-7.
External links
[edit]- The Understanding Unbelief program in the University of Kent.
- "Will religion ever disappear?", from BBC Future, by Rachel Nuwer, in December 2014
Irreligion
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Terminology
Core Definition
Irreligion refers to the absence of religious beliefs, practices, or affiliations, encompassing positions ranging from indifference to explicit rejection of religious doctrines and institutions.[7] This includes individuals who do not identify with any organized faith or endorse supernatural claims typically associated with religions, such as deities, afterlife, or divine revelation.[8] In dictionary usage, it contrasts with religiosity by denoting a lack of piety or commitment to sacred traditions, without implying adherence to an alternative ideology.[9] While some interpretations emphasize hostility or opposition to religion—viewing it as impiety or antagonism toward faith-based systems—others treat it as neutral non-participation, distinct from active disbelief.[7][10] For instance, sociological analyses often frame irreligion broadly to include those who simply do not engage with religious communities, rather than requiring philosophical argumentation against theism.[11] This broader scope differentiates irreligion from narrower categories like atheism, which specifically denies the existence of gods, or agnosticism, which asserts uncertainty about divine matters; irreligious individuals may hold either view or neither, prioritizing empirical or secular worldviews instead.[12][13] In empirical surveys, irreligion manifests as self-reported "no religion" or "unaffiliated" status, capturing diverse motivations from rational skepticism to cultural disconnection, without presupposing uniform ideological commitment.[12] This measurement approach, used by organizations tracking global belief trends, highlights irreligion's prevalence in modern societies but underscores definitional challenges, as respondents may vary in their rejection of spiritual elements versus institutional religion alone.[12]Etymology and Usage
The term irreligion originates from Late Latin irreligiosus, formed by combining the negating prefix in- ("not") with religiosus ("religious" or "pious"), initially denoting impiety, irreverence toward the divine, or disregard for sacred obligations.[14] This Late Latin root, in turn, derives from irreligiō or irreligiōn-em, blending in- with religiō ("religion" or "obligation to the gods"), reflecting an early connotation of failing to fulfill religious duties rather than mere absence of belief.[15] The word entered Middle French as irréligion before appearing in English by the late 16th century, coinciding with the Protestant Reformation's erosion of monolithic religious authority and the rise of individual skepticism.[8] In modern usage, irreligion serves as an umbrella term for the lack, rejection, or indifference to organized religious beliefs, doctrines, and practices, distinguishing it from narrower concepts like atheism—which specifically entails disbelief in deities or the divine—or agnosticism, which posits uncertainty or unknowability about supernatural existence.[16] Unlike atheism's focus on theistic claims, irreligion accommodates a spectrum of non-participatory stances, including those of "nones" who affiliate with no religion yet may retain cultural rituals or vague spirituality without doctrinal commitment, as observed in surveys where 28% of U.S. adults in 2024 self-identified as religiously unaffiliated across atheist, agnostic, or "nothing in particular" categories.[12] Historically, the term carried pejorative undertones of moral or social deviance in religious societies, but contemporary applications emphasize empirical self-reporting in demographic studies, avoiding conflation with active antireligious activism.[17] This breadth allows irreligion to capture implicit non-belief in secularizing contexts, where individuals eschew institutional religion without philosophical elaboration on gods.[18]Types and Variants
Explicit Non-Belief Forms
Explicit non-belief forms involve conscious positions rejecting or withholding assent to the existence of deities or supernatural entities, often derived from rational evaluation of evidence or logical inconsistencies in theistic claims. These differ from implicit non-belief, such as in infants or those unaware of theistic propositions, by requiring deliberate consideration and affirmation of disbelief.[2][19] Atheism constitutes a central explicit form, characterized as the lack of belief in deities. Philosophers distinguish weak (or negative) atheism, which asserts only the absence of theistic belief without claiming definitive knowledge of non-existence, from strong (or positive) atheism, which explicitly denies the existence of any gods based on evidential or argumentative grounds. Weak atheism aligns with positions where the burden of proof is placed on theists, as no compelling evidence supports theistic claims. Strong atheism, conversely, advances affirmative arguments, such as the problem of evil or inconsistencies in divine attributes, to conclude non-existence.[2][19][20] Agnosticism represents another explicit stance, focusing on the epistemological limits of knowing divine existence. Termed by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1869 to denote suspension of judgment due to insufficient evidence, it holds that the truth about deities is either currently unknown or inherently unknowable. Agnosticism is orthogonal to atheism: an agnostic atheist lacks belief in gods while acknowledging uncertainty, whereas an agnostic theist believes despite epistemic humility. This position critiques both dogmatic theism and unsubstantiated atheistic certainty, emphasizing empirical verifiability.[2][21][22] Other variants include ignosticism, which contends that the concept of a deity is too vaguely defined to warrant belief or disbelief, rendering theistic debates semantically incoherent until clarified. These forms collectively prioritize reason and evidence over faith, though surveys indicate self-identification varies; for instance, many who lack belief prefer "agnostic" to avoid connotations of militancy associated with "atheist."[2][23]Implicit and Cultural Forms
Implicit irreligion refers to the absence of religious belief or active theistic commitment without an explicit rejection of religion, often manifesting as indifference or unexamined non-affiliation rather than deliberate skepticism.[19] This form contrasts with explicit non-belief by lacking conscious deliberation, encompassing individuals who simply do not hold or prioritize religious views amid daily life.[24] In contemporary surveys, implicit irreligion appears prominently among the "religiously unaffiliated" or "nones," particularly those identifying as "nothing in particular." In the United States, as of 2024, 28% of adults fall into this unaffiliated category, with approximately two-thirds classified as "nothing in particular" rather than atheists or agnostics; many in this subgroup report vague spiritual leanings or belief in a higher power without institutional ties.[12] Globally, nones often outnumber explicit atheists and agnostics, with "nothing in particular" responses predominant in regions like Western Europe and East Asia, where up to 70% may express non-affiliation yet retain openness to supernatural elements.[25] Cultural forms of irreligion involve selective engagement with religious traditions as social or heritage practices, detached from doctrinal adherence or personal faith. In Japan, where surveys indicate about 70% of the population holds non-religious sentiments, individuals commonly participate in Shinto shrine visits for New Year's or Buddhist funerals without viewing these as expressions of belief, treating them instead as communal customs rooted in pragmatism and ancestry.[26] This syncretic approach yields formal religious adherents exceeding the population—182 million in 2016—due to multiple nominal affiliations, underscoring irreligion's compatibility with ritual observance.[27] In Western Europe, cultural Christianity exemplifies this pattern, where non-practicing individuals—comprising a majority of self-identified Christians—celebrate holidays like Christmas or Easter for familial and seasonal reasons, while rarely attending services or affirming core tenets.[28] Such practices preserve social cohesion and historical identity amid broader secularization, differing from unaffiliated nones primarily in nominal labeling rather than behavioral rejection of tradition.[29] These implicit and cultural variants highlight irreligion's spectrum, where empirical data reveal non-affiliation often coexists with residual or instrumental religiosity, challenging binary categorizations of belief and unbelief.[25]Historical Development
Ancient and Pre-Modern Instances
In ancient India, the Cārvāka (or Lokāyata) school represented an early materialist philosophy that explicitly rejected the existence of gods, an afterlife, karma, and the authority of the Vedas, relying solely on direct perception as a valid means of knowledge.[30] This tradition, traceable to at least the 6th century BCE through references in texts like the Sarvadarśanasaṃgraha, emphasized sensory experience and hedonistic ethics, dismissing supernatural explanations for natural phenomena as unprovable.[31] Cārvāka thinkers critiqued ritualistic practices and priestly authority, arguing that consciousness arises from the body like intoxication from fermented liquids, with no enduring soul.[30] In ancient Greece, explicit skepticism toward traditional gods emerged among certain philosophers and poets in the 5th century BCE. Diagoras of Melos, dubbed "the Atheist," was prosecuted around 415 BCE for mocking the Eleusinian Mysteries and denying divine intervention, leading to his exile from Athens.[32] Protagoras of Abdera expressed agnosticism by stating, "Concerning the gods I am unable to say whether they exist or not," resulting in his books being burned and expulsion from Athens circa 411 BCE.[33] Atomists like Democritus (c. 460–370 BCE) posited a mechanistic universe of indivisible particles in void, reducing phenomena to chance collisions without need for divine creation or providence.[34] Roman Epicureanism, building on Greek atomism, promoted irreligion through denial of active godly involvement in human affairs. Lucretius (c. 99–55 BCE) in De Rerum Natura argued that gods, if existent, reside in distant intermundia unaffected by the world, rendering religious fears of divine punishment irrational and advocating a life free from superstitious piety.[34] Such views faced persecution, as seen in the execution of philosopher Theodorus of Cyrene (c. 300 BCE) for atheism.[32] In ancient China, Confucian thought from the 6th–5th centuries BCE emphasized ethical humanism and ritual over theistic devotion, with Confucius (551–479 BCE) treating "Heaven" as an impersonal cosmic order rather than a personal deity demanding worship.[35] Legalist philosophers like Han Feizi (c. 280–233 BCE) focused on statecraft and human nature without invoking supernatural sanctions, prioritizing empirical governance over religious cosmology.[35] However, these strands coexisted with folk animism and ancestor veneration, limiting widespread irreligion. Pre-modern instances in monotheistic regions were rarer and more covert due to severe penalties, including execution for heresy. In medieval Europe, accusations of atheism surfaced against figures like the poet Cecco d'Ascoli, burned at the stake in 1327 for denying divine foreknowledge, though such cases often conflated doubt with sorcery. Underground skepticism persisted among some intellectuals, but explicit irreligion remained marginal until the Renaissance, suppressed by inquisitorial authorities enforcing orthodoxy.[36] In Islamic contexts, occasional materialist critiques appeared, such as in the writings of Rhazes (865–925 CE), who questioned prophetic miracles, but these were outliers amid dominant theism.[37]Enlightenment to 19th Century
The Enlightenment, spanning roughly the mid-17th to late 18th centuries, marked a pivotal intellectual shift in Europe toward empirical reason and skepticism of traditional religious authority, fostering early expressions of irreligion through deism and clandestine atheism.[38] Thinkers like David Hume critiqued organized religion in works such as The Natural History of Religion (1757), arguing that beliefs arose from human fears and superstitions rather than divine revelation, leading to accusations of atheism despite his agnostic leanings.[39] In France, Denis Diderot and Paul-Henri Thiry, Baron d'Holbach, advanced explicit atheism; d'Holbach's System of Nature (1770) posited a materialist universe devoid of supernatural intervention, influencing underground networks of freethinkers.[40] These ideas circulated secretly due to persecution risks, with atheism remaining a minority stance amid dominant deism, which accepted a creator but rejected revelation and clergy.[39] The French Revolution (1789–1799) represented the first state-sponsored push toward irreligion, culminating in the dechristianization campaign of 1793–1794 during the Reign of Terror.[41] Radical Jacobins, influenced by Enlightenment materialism, enacted laws closing churches, confiscating ecclesiastical property, and mandating civil oaths that forced approximately 30,000 priests into exile or execution for non-compliance; public worship was suppressed, and revolutionary cults like the Cult of Reason promoted atheistic festivals.[42] This policy, driven by anti-clericalism viewing the Catholic Church as allied with monarchy, briefly aimed to eradicate Christianity but faltered amid social chaos, ending with Maximilien Robespierre's 1794 decree establishing the deistic Cult of the Supreme Being.[43] In the 19th century, irreligion evolved into organized freethought and secularism, particularly in Britain and parts of Europe, propelled by industrialization, scientific advances, and lingering revolutionary ideals.[44] George Jacob Holyoake coined "secularism" in 1851, advocating a non-religious ethics based on evidence and utility, separate from theistic metaphysics; he faced imprisonment in 1842 as the last Briton convicted for atheism.[45] Freethought societies proliferated, challenging biblical literalism amid Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859), though explicit atheism remained marginal, often conflated with radical politics; by mid-century, secular publications and lectures promoted irreligion as compatible with moral progress without divine sanction.[44] This era saw irreligion transition from elite philosophy to public discourse, laying groundwork for later mass secularization, though church attendance persisted among majorities.[46]20th Century State Imposition
In the 20th century, several communist regimes pursued state-imposed irreligion as a core policy, rooted in Marxist-Leninist ideology that viewed religion as an instrument of class oppression and a barrier to proletarian revolution.[47] This led to systematic campaigns of persecution, closure of religious institutions, and promotion of scientific atheism through state organizations. The Soviet Union under Bolshevik rule from 1917 onward exemplified this approach, declaring religion a hindrance to socialist progress and initiating aggressive anti-religious measures.[48] The Soviet campaign intensified after the 1917 Revolution, with the 1918 decree on separation of church and state evolving into active suppression. By 1939, only about 200 Orthodox churches remained open from approximately 46,000 prior to the Revolution, as clergy were executed, imprisoned, or exiled and thousands of religious sites were destroyed or repurposed.[48] The League of Militant Atheists, established in 1925, grew to millions of members by the late 1920s, propagating anti-religious propaganda and mobilizing public actions against believers. Under Nikita Khrushchev in the late 1950s, a renewed drive closed an additional 20,000 churches between 1958 and 1964, enforcing official atheism while underground religious practice persisted despite severe penalties.[49] In the People's Republic of China, following the 1949 communist victory, Mao Zedong's policies escalated during the Cultural Revolution from 1966 to 1976, where Red Guards targeted religious sites as symbols of feudalism and superstition. Buddhist temples, Taoist shrines, Christian churches, and mosques were looted, desecrated, or demolished en masse, with monks and clergy subjected to public humiliation, forced labor, or execution.[50] This destruction extended to cultural artifacts, effectively eradicating public religious expression and aligning with the regime's aim to replace traditional beliefs with Maoist ideology. Albania under Enver Hoxha represented the most explicit declaration of state atheism, with the 1967 constitution proclaiming it the world's first atheist state and banning all religious practices, institutions, and symbols.[51] Churches, mosques, and monasteries—over 2,000 in total—were closed, demolished, or converted, while possessing religious texts or artifacts became punishable by imprisonment or death. Hoxha's regime, influenced by Stalinist models, enforced this through surveillance and indoctrination, though private belief endured covertly. Similar impositions occurred in other communist states, such as Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge (1975–1979), where nearly all monks were killed and pagodas destroyed, and North Korea, where Juche ideology supplanted religion with state worship. These policies, driven by the causal logic of totalitarian control over ideology, resulted in millions of deaths and widespread cultural erasure, yet failed to eliminate religiosity entirely, as evidenced by post-regime revivals.[52]Post-1945 to Present
![Countries by percentage of unaffiliated (Pew Research 2010)][float-right] Following World War II, irreligion expanded significantly in regions under communist governance, where state atheism became official policy. In the Soviet Union, anti-religious campaigns intensified after a brief wartime relaxation, with the number of active Russian Orthodox churches declining from around 20,000 in 1948 to fewer than 6,000 by 1985 due to closures and restrictions on religious practice.[53] Similarly, in China after the 1949 Communist Revolution, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) denounced religion as superstition and incompatible with Marxism-Leninism, leading to the suppression of religious institutions and promotion of atheism through education and propaganda.[54] By 2012, a Gallup poll reported 47% of Chinese as convinced atheists and 30% as non-religious in belief, though folk practices persisted informally.[55] In Eastern Europe and other communist states, such as Albania, which declared itself the world's first atheist state in 1967 by banning all religious activity, irreligion was enforced through legal prohibitions and persecution, resulting in near-total suppression of organized religion until the 1990s.[51] Post-communist transitions saw partial religious revivals in some countries like Poland and Russia, but others, including the Czech Republic, retained high levels of irreligion, with surveys indicating over 70% unaffiliated by the 2010s. In Asia beyond China, countries like Japan and Vietnam exhibited elevated irreligion, influenced by both communist policies in the latter and historical cultural factors, with Vietnam's state maintaining Marxist-Leninist atheism since unification in 1976.[56] Western Europe experienced accelerated secularization after 1945, marked by declining church attendance and affiliation. In countries like France and the United Kingdom, regular churchgoing fell from over 40% in the 1950s to under 10% by the 2000s, driven by urbanization, scientific advancements, and cultural shifts away from institutional religion.[57] This trend contrasted with a temporary post-war religious resurgence in the United States, where church membership peaked at 70% in the 1950s, but by 2024, Pew Research found 28% of U.S. adults religiously unaffiliated ("nones"), up from about 5% in the 1970s, with the share stabilizing somewhat after rapid growth in the 2010s.[12] The U.S. rise correlates with generational shifts, as 40% of millennials identified as unaffiliated by 2019.[58] Globally, while irreligion grew in developed regions, the proportion of unaffiliated individuals remained stable at around 16% from 1980 to 2020, offset by higher religiosity in sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East.[59] In East Asia, high unaffiliation persists, with South Korea at about 50% non-religious by recent surveys, reflecting modernization and weak institutional ties to religion. These patterns highlight regionally divergent drivers, including state policies in atheist regimes and voluntary disaffiliation in liberal democracies, though empirical data from sources like Pew underscore that global atheism prevalence has not surged uniformly.[60]Demographics and Geography
Global Prevalence
![Countries by percentage of religiously unaffiliated (Pew Research, 2010)][float-right] As of 2020, approximately 1.9 billion people worldwide, representing 24.2% of the global population, identified as religiously unaffiliated, meaning they did not adhere to any organized religion.[3] This figure marked a 17% increase from 1.6 billion in 2010, outpacing overall population growth and reflecting a slight rise in the unaffiliated share from about 23% to 24%.[61] This growth has been driven primarily by religious switching and disaffiliation, especially among former adherents of Christianity, rather than natural population increase, as the unaffiliated tend to have lower fertility rates than religious groups. In contrast, religions such as Islam have grown faster due to higher fertility and younger median ages, contributing to the relatively stable global share of the unaffiliated.[3] The unaffiliated category encompasses atheists, agnostics, and those selecting "none" in surveys, though many retain spiritual or supernatural beliefs, with surveys indicating that a majority of nones in various regions endorse ideas like an afterlife or a higher power.[25] The largest concentrations of unaffiliated individuals occur in East Asia, particularly China, where over 700 million people—more than half the national population—report no religious affiliation, driven by historical state atheism under communism and cultural secularism.[62] Europe follows, with countries like the Czech Republic, Estonia, and the United Kingdom showing unaffiliated rates exceeding 30-50% in national censuses and surveys, attributable to post-Enlightenment secularization and declining institutional religion.[3] In contrast, sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East-North Africa region exhibit the lowest rates, often below 5%, where traditional and Abrahamic faiths remain deeply embedded in social structures.[3] Explicit irreligion, such as self-identified atheism or agnosticism, constitutes a smaller subset globally, estimated at 2-7% depending on survey methodology and regional focus, with higher explicit non-belief in urbanized, educated demographics in Western nations and parts of Asia.[25] Data reliability varies, as self-reported affiliation can understate irreligion in religiously repressive societies and overstate it where social desirability biases responses toward secularism; cross-national surveys like those from Pew and Gallup consistently highlight China, Japan, and Vietnam as harboring the world's largest irreligious populations in absolute terms.[3]Regional and National Patterns
Irreligion displays pronounced regional variations, with the highest proportions concentrated in East Asia and select European nations. As of 2020, the Asia-Pacific region accounted for the majority of the global religiously unaffiliated population, estimated at 1.9 billion worldwide, driven primarily by China where over 700 million individuals lack formal religious affiliation due to state-enforced atheism and cultural syncretism.[61] In contrast, sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East exhibit near-total religious adherence, with irreligion rates below 5% in most countries.[61] In East Asia, Japan reports irreligion rates exceeding 80%, with surveys indicating 86% of the population identifying as non-religious, reflecting a cultural emphasis on secular rituals over doctrinal belief.[63] Similarly, Vietnam and South Korea show high unaffiliation, around 81% and 60% respectively, where traditional practices persist without exclusive religious commitment.[64] China's figures, often cited at 91% atheist or unaffiliated, stem from communist policies suppressing organized religion since 1949, though underground folk beliefs may inflate actual practice beyond official tallies.[63][65] Europe features elevated irreligion in post-communist states and Scandinavia. The Czech Republic leads with approximately 75-78% of its population irreligious, a legacy of Habsburg-era skepticism compounded by 20th-century state atheism under Soviet influence.[63][4] Sweden follows closely at 78%, per 2023 Gallup data, where secular welfare systems correlate with declining church attendance since the 1960s.[66] Estonia and other Baltic nations exceed 60%, contrasting with more religious Southern Europe.[4] In the Americas, patterns diverge sharply. North America sees rising unaffiliation, reaching 29% in the United States by 2020, up from 16% in 2007, amid cultural shifts toward individualism.[67] Latin America maintains lower rates, though Uruguay and Chile report over 30% irreligious, influenced by urbanization.[67] Australia aligns with Western trends at around 30-40% unaffiliated.[67]| Country | Estimated Irreligion Rate (%) | Primary Source |
|---|---|---|
| Czech Republic | 75-78 | Gallup/Times of India[63] |
| Japan | 86 | Various surveys[63] |
| Sweden | 78 | Gallup 2023[66] |
| China | 91 | State data/surveys[63] |
| Estonia | 60 | World Population Review[4] |
