Hubbry Logo
ProtagorasProtagorasMain
Open search
Protagoras
Community hub
Protagoras
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Protagoras
Protagoras
Protagoras
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Protagoras (/proʊˈtæɡərəs, -æs/ proh-TAG-ər-əs, -⁠ass; Greek: Πρωταγόρας; c. 490 BC – c. 420 BC)[1] was a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher and rhetorical theorist. He is numbered as one of the sophists by Plato. In his dialogue Protagoras, Plato credits him with inventing the role of the professional sophist.

Key Information

Protagoras is also believed to have created a major controversy during ancient times through his statement that "Of all things the measure is Man, of the things that are, that they are, and of the things that are not, that they are not" which was usually rendered simply as "Man is the measure of all things," interpreted (possibly wrongly, since he disagreed[clarification needed]) by Plato to mean that there is no objective truth; Protagoras seems to have meant that each person's own personal history, experiences and expectations, developed over their lifetime, determine their judgments, opinions, and statements regarding "truth" (which is the title of the book in which Protagoras made this statement). When a person makes a judgment about a certain thing—good or bad or beautiful or unjust—that person will differ from other people's judgments because their experience has been different.[2]

This concept of individual relativity was intended to be provocative; naturally, it was criticized by Plato and other philosophers, contrasting with both popular opinion and other philosophical doctrine that reality and its truth must have an objective grounding. However, it was part of Protagoras' point that the statement is somewhat counterintuitive. He argued that this concept—believing that others' opinions about the world are valid and must be respected, even if our own experience of truth is different—is necessary for a community to base itself and its decisions on open, democratic debate.[3]

Biography

[edit]

Protagoras was born in Abdera, Thrace, opposite the island of Thasos, around 490 BC.[1][4] According to Aulus Gellius, he originally made his living as a porter, but one day he was seen by the philosopher Democritus carrying a load of small pieces of wood he had tied with a short cord. Democritus realized that Protagoras had tied the load together with such perfect geometric accuracy that he must be a mathematical prodigy. Democritus promptly took him into his own household and taught him philosophy.[5] Protagoras became well known in Athens and even became a friend of Pericles.[6]

The dates of his life are not recorded but extrapolated from writings that have survived the ages. In Protagoras Plato wrote that, before a gathering of Socrates, Prodicus, and Hippias, Protagoras stated that he was old enough to be the father of any of them. This suggests a birth date of not later than 490 BC. In the Meno he is said to have died at approximately the age of 70, after 40 years as a practising Sophist.[7][8] His death, then, may be presumed to have occurred circa 420 BC, but is not known for certain, since assumptions about it are based on an apparently fake story about his trial for asebeia (impiety) in Athens.[9]

Plutarch wrote that Pericles and Protagoras spent a whole day discussing an interesting point of legal responsibility, that probably involved a more philosophical question of causation:[10] "In an athletic contest, a man had been accidentally hit and killed with a javelin. Was his death to be attributed to the javelin, to the man who threw it, or to the authorities responsible for the conduct of the games?"[11]

Philosophy

[edit]
Democritus and Protagoras by Salvator Rosa; it is said that Protagoras was educated on philosophy by Democritus, but this is likely apocryphal.

Even though he was mentored by Democritus, Protagoras did not share his enthusiasm for the pursuit of mathematics. "For perceptible lines are not the kind of things the geometer talks about, since no perceptible thing is straight or curved in that way, nor is a circle tangent to a ruler at a point, but the way Protagoras used to say in refuting the geometers" (Aristotle, Metaphysics 997b34-998a4). Protagoras was skeptical about the application of theoretical mathematics to the natural world; he did not believe they were really worth studying at all. According to Philodemus, Protagoras said that "The subject matter is unknowable and the terminology distasteful". Nonetheless, mathematics was considered to be by some a very viable form of art, and Protagoras says on the arts, "art (tekhnê) without practice and practice without art are nothing" (Stobaeus, Selections 3.29.80).

Protagoras taught subjects related to virtue and political life. He especially was involved in the question of whether virtue could be taught, a commonplace issue of fifth century BC Greece, that has been related to modern readers through Plato's dialogue. Rather than educators who offered specific, practical training in rhetoric or public speaking, Protagoras attempted to formulate a reasoned understanding, on a very general level, of a wide range of human phenomena, including language and education. In Plato's Protagoras, he claims to teach "the proper management of one's own affairs, how best to run one's household, and the management of public affairs, how to make the most effective contribution to the affairs of the city by word and action".[12]

He also seems to have had an interest in "orthoepeia"—the correct use of words—although this topic is more strongly associated with his fellow sophist Prodicus. In his eponymous Platonic dialogue, Protagoras interprets a poem by Simonides, focusing on the use of words, their literal meaning, and the author's original intent. This type of education would have been useful for the interpretation of laws and other written documents in the Athenian courts.[13] Diogenes Laërtius reports that Protagoras devised a taxonomy of speech acts, such as assertion, question, answer, command, etc. Aristotle also says that Protagoras worked on the classification and proper use of grammatical gender.[14][15]

The titles of his books, such as Technique of Eristics (Technē Eristikōn, literally "Practice of Wranglings"— wrestling used as a metaphor for intellectual debate), prove that Protagoras also was a teacher of rhetoric and argumentation. Diogenes Laërtius states that he was one of the first to take part in rhetorical contests in the Olympic games.[14]

Eusebius quoting Aristocles of Messene says that Protagoras was a member of a line of philosophy that began with Xenophanes and culminated in Pyrrhonism.[16]

Relativism

[edit]
Part of a series on
Rhetoric
History
Concepts
Genres
Criticism
Rhetoricians
Works
Subfields
Related

Protagoras also said that on any matter, there are two arguments (logoi) opposed to one another. Consequently, he may have been the author of Dissoi logoi, an ancient Sophistic text on such opposing arguments.[17] According to Aristotle, Protagoras was criticized for having claimed "to make the weaker argument stronger".[18][14]

Protagoras is credited with the philosophy of relativism, which he discussed in his lost work, Truth (also known as Refutations).[13][19] Although knowledge of Protagoras' position is limited, his relativism is inferred from one of his most famous statements: "Man is the measure of all things: of the things that are, that they are, of the things that are not, that they are not."[20][21]

Protagoras appears to have meant that each individual is the measure of how things are perceived by that individual. Therefore, things are, or are not, true according to how the individual perceives them. For example, Person X may believe that the weather is cold, whereas Person Y may believe that the weather is hot. According to the philosophy of Protagoras, there is no absolute evaluation of the nature of a temperature because the evaluation will be relative to who is perceiving it. Therefore, to Person X, the weather is cold, whereas to Person Y, the weather is hot. This philosophy implies that there are no absolute "truths". The truth, according to Protagoras, is relative, and differs according to each individual.[13]

Plato ascribes relativism to Protagoras and uses his character Socrates as a foil for his own commitment to objective and transcendent realities and values. Plato ascribes to Protagoras an early form of what John Wild categorized as phenomenalism.[22] That being an assertion that something that is, or appears for a single individual, is true or real for that individual. However, as described in Plato's Theaetetus, Protagoras's views allow that some views may result from an ill body or mind. He stressed that although all views may appear equally true, and perhaps, should be equally respected, they certainly are not of equal gravity. One view may be useful and advantageous to the person who has it, while the perception of another may prove harmful. Hence, Protagoras believed that the sophist was there to teach the student how to discriminate between them, i.e., to teach virtue.

Both Plato and Aristotle argue against some of Protagoras's claims regarding relativity; however, they argue that the concept provides Protagoras with too convenient an exemption from his own theory and that relativism is true for him yet false for those who do not believe it. They claim that by asserting that truth is relative, Protagoras then could say that whatever further theory he proposed must be true.[23]

Agnosticism

[edit]

Protagoras was a proponent of either agnosticism or, as Tim Whitmarsh claims, atheism, on the grounds that since he held that if something is not able to be known it does not exist.[24] Reportedly, in Protagoras's lost work, On the Gods, he wrote: "Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not, nor of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and the brevity of human life."[25][26][27]

According to Diogenes Laërtius, the outspoken, agnostic position taken by Protagoras aroused anger, causing the Athenians to expel him from the city, and all copies of his book were collected and burned in the marketplace. The deliberate destruction of his works is also mentioned by Cicero.[28] The classicist John Burnet doubts this account, however, as both Diogenes Laërtius and Cicero wrote hundreds of years later and as no such persecution of Protagoras is mentioned by contemporaries who make extensive references to this philosopher.[29] Burnet notes that even if some copies of the Protagoras books were burned, enough of them survived to be known and discussed in the following century.

Spectrum of topics

[edit]

Nonetheless, very few fragments from Protagoras have survived, although he is known to have written several different works: Antilogiae and Truth. The latter is cited by Plato, and was known alternatively as, The Throws (a wrestling term referring to the attempt to floor an opponent). It began with the "Man is the measure" (ἄνθρωπος μέτρον) pronouncement. According to Diogenes Laërtius other books by Protagoras include: On the Gods, Art of Eristics, Imperative, On Ambition, On Incorrect Human Actions, On Those in Hades, On Sciences, On Virtues, On the Original State of Things and Trial over a Fee.[14]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Protagoras

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Protagoras (Greek: Πρωταγόρας; c. 490–420 BC) was a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher and from Abdera in , widely regarded as the first professional teacher who charged fees for instruction in , , and the acquisition of . He articulated a relativistic doctrine asserting that "man is the measure of all things: of things that are, that they are, and of things that are not, that they are not," positing that truth and reality are determined by individual human perception rather than objective standards. Protagoras traveled extensively, including to where he associated with and debated the teachability of excellence, but his agnostic stance on the divine—expressed as uncertainty about the gods' existence due to the brevity of life and obscurity of the matter—provoked accusations of , culminating in the public burning of his writings and his reported flight or demise around age seventy. His ideas, preserved largely through 's eponymous and Theaetetus, profoundly influenced subsequent debates on , ethics, and the role of sophistry in democratic discourse, though critics like portrayed them as undermining fixed moral and intellectual foundations.

Biography

Origins and Early Influences

Protagoras was born circa 490 BCE in Abdera, a Greek colony in on the Thracian Chersonese, opposite the island of . As an Ionian foundation originally settled from and Clazomenae, Abdera maintained commercial ties across the Aegean, facilitating exposure to Milesian and broader Ionian inquiries into nature and human affairs, though direct evidence of Protagoras's early engagement with these remains speculative. The city's later association with atomists and underscores its role as a peripheral hub for innovative thought amid Thrace's mix of Greek settler practices and local tribal influences. Ancient biographies portray Protagoras as originating from humble circumstances, initially employed as a porter handling loads of or hides, a demanding ingenuity in binding and carrying. He is attributed with inventing the dulche, a padded device to distribute weight evenly, highlighting practical problem-solving skills honed in manual labor. These accounts, drawn from later Hellenistic compilations, emphasize a self-reliant transition to intellectual work, unassisted by formal schooling in the rigid sense prevalent in . A persistent anecdote, reported by and echoed in , claims Protagoras caught the eye of —his near-contemporary fellow Abderite—while demonstrating exceptional dexterity in securing small sticks of wood into a cohesive bundle, prompting the elder thinker to recognize his potential and draw him into philosophical circles. later asserted direct study under Democritus, but such tales, blending admiration for with hagiographic flair, warrant as retrospective idealizations rather than verifiable history, given Democritus's birth around 460 BCE postdates Protagoras's likely early maturity. This narrative nonetheless illustrates the cultural valuation of emergent talent from artisanal roots in shaping proto-sophistic figures.

Career as Sophist and Teacher

Protagoras first gained prominence in around 444 BCE, forging a close association with , who tasked him with drafting the legal code for the Athenian colony of in circa 443 BCE. This commission reflected his emerging reputation for expertise in and , positioning him amid discussions on constitutional design during Athens' expansive colonial phase. As the earliest and most renowned , Protagoras pioneered professional instruction by charging substantial fees—reportedly up to 100 minae per student—for training in persuasive speech, political strategy, and practical excellence suited to public life. His clientele included elite Athenian youth seeking advantages in assemblies and courts, yielding him greater earnings than any prior intellectual over four decades of teaching. Protagoras maintained an itinerant practice, journeying across Greek city-states to deliver lectures and private lessons, often overlapping with contemporaries like of in shared intellectual circles. This mobility enabled him to cultivate networks among emerging leaders, equipping them with tools for influence as interstate rivalries intensified toward the Peloponnesian War's outbreak in 431 BCE. His success underscored the demand for such education in democratic polities, where rhetorical prowess directly impacted political outcomes.

Trial for Impiety and Exile

Protagoras faced charges of (asebeia) in late in his career, reportedly for the agnostic preface to his work On the Gods, which stated: "As to the gods, I have no means of knowing either that they exist or do not exist, nor what they are like in form or , since there are many things that prevent : the obscurity of the subject and the shortness of human life." This allegedly prompted a public prosecution under Athenian laws against denying the gods or introducing new deities, resulting in the public burning of his books in the Agora and his exile. The primary account derives from (Lives IX.51–52), a third-century CE compiler who drew on earlier Hellenistic sources, but lacks corroboration from fifth-century BCE contemporaries like or , who documented other cases such as that of around 450 BCE. Scholarly analysis questions the trial's historicity, noting the anecdotal nature of testimonies and absence of epigraphic or legal records from the Athenian boule or dikasteria, unlike preserved evidence for later trials like ' in 399 BCE; the narrative may reflect later Peripatetic or Stoic embellishments to dramatize sophistic perils amid rising civic piety post-Peloponnesian War setbacks. In response to the alleged verdict, Protagoras reportedly fled by ship toward , a common refuge for exiles seeking hospitable Greek colonies, but perished in a en route, circa 420 BCE when he was approximately seventy years old. This outcome aligns with patterns of democratic backlash against itinerant intellectuals perceived as undermining traditional nomoi during ' imperial strains, though the synchronized timing of flight, destruction, and death relies solely on late biographical traditions without independent verification.

Core Philosophical Positions

The Measure Doctrine

Protagoras's most renowned epistemological position, known as the homo mensura doctrine, asserts that "of all things the measure is man, of the things that are, that they are, and of things that are not, that they are not." This fragment, preserved in Plato's Theaetetus (152a) and cataloged as DK 80 B1, posits that human perception determines the of phenomena for the individual perceiver, establishing subjective experience as the criterion for truth rather than any objective or transcendent standard. Empirical sensations thus serve as the foundational measure, where conflicting appearances—such as a feeling cold to one person and warm to another—hold validity relative to each observer's sensory state, without privileging one over the other. The doctrine emphasizes perceptual , wherein truths about qualities like temperature, taste, or hardness derive exclusively from individual sensations, implying that no universal properties exist independently of human apprehension. For instance, the sweetness or bitterness of food varies by the taster's , rendering such properties relational and observer-dependent rather than inherent in the object itself. This approach grounds in direct, causal interactions between perceiver and perceived, prioritizing verifiable sensory data over abstract postulations of unchanging essence. Interpretations extend the doctrine beyond mere sensations to a form of truth-relativism, where all judgments, including those on abstract matters, are true for the individual holding them, as "each thing appears to me so it is for me, and to you so it is for you." While perceptual variants focus on immediate empirical discrepancies, broader readings suggest a comprehensive applicable to cognitive evaluations, though anchored in the of rather than arbitrary opinion. Protagoras's position implicitly rejects ' monism, which denied change and multiplicity in favor of an eternal, unchanging being, by affirming the primacy of human perception amid a world of variable appearances. Influenced by Heraclitean notions of constant flux—where reality consists of perpetual becoming rather than static being—the doctrine privileges dynamic sensory measures as causally efficacious accounts of what exists, dismissing Eleatic denials of sensory reliability as disconnected from observable variability. This causal orientation underscores human faculties as adaptive instruments for navigating an inherently mutable environment, with truth emerging from perceptual engagement rather than speculative deduction.

Religious Skepticism

Protagoras expressed his views on in the opening of his work Peri Theōn (On the Gods), stating: "Concerning the gods, I am not able to know either that they exist or do not exist, nor what they are like in form; for there are many things that prevent [one] from finding out, the obscurity of the matter and the shortness of human life." This fragment, preserved through testimonia in and others, underscores an epistemic limitation rooted in empirical constraints: divine matters lie beyond direct human observation or verification, unlike observable phenomena in human experience. The doctrine avoids dogmatic assertions of or , positioning Protagoras as an early agnostic who suspended judgment due to insufficient evidence rather than outright rejection. By invoking the "obscurity" of the subject—likely alluding to conflicting mythological accounts and lack of sensory access—Protagoras prioritized grounded in what humans can ascertain through over unverifiable metaphysical claims. This approach aligned with tendencies to question anthropomorphic depictions in Homeric and Hesiodic traditions, which portrayed gods with inconsistent behaviors, yet Protagoras did not dismiss or civic , advocating instead a pragmatic focus on human affairs amenable to inquiry.

Virtue, Rhetoric, and Human Progress

Protagoras asserted that aretē (excellence or ), particularly the political virtues of (dikē) and (aidōs), is teachable through systematic and , distinguishing it from innate physical or animalistic traits unevenly apportioned by . In his "Great Speech," preserved in Plato's dialogue, he illustrated this via the myth of and : imprudently allocated defensive qualities like speed, strength, and fur to non-human animals until supplies were depleted, leaving nascent humans defenseless and vulnerable to extinction. rectified this by covertly appropriating , along with practical arts (technai) such as , house-building, and from and , thereby equipping humans with tools for survival, invention, and rudimentary technological progress independent of divine endowment. Despite these advancements, Protagoras explained, technical skills alone engendered intraspecies strife, as humans formed scattered settlements marred by and , prompting to distribute aidōs and dikē not to select elites but universally to all, enabling communal reciprocity, formation (poleis), and the institutionalization of as a communal teachable practice enforced by families, laws, and . This distribution underpinned Protagoras's causal sequence of human advancement: initial technological ingenuity provided material foundations, but only the egalitarian infusion of political virtues sustained social cohesion and precluded , with —via parental instruction, symposia, and civic participation—perpetuating virtue's transmission akin to crafts like farming or . Rhetoric (rhētorikē) formed a of Protagoras's pedagogical method for cultivating this teachable , serving as the practical instrument for persuasive deliberation in democratic assemblies and courts, where outcomes hinged on probable inferences (eikota) from human experience rather than unattainable certainties. He innovated techniques like antilogiē (counterargumentation), training students to defend opposing positions with equal vigor to sharpen dialectical acuity and adapt to contingent civic disputes over or . This emphasis on rhetorical mastery reflected Protagoras's view of correctness (orthoepeia) as foundational to effective , empowering citizens to navigate probability-laden debates and advance collective welfare through eloquent advocacy rooted in social utility and empirical observation. Protagoras's framework thus traced a deterministic progression from technological adaptation to political sophistication, crediting human agency—via acquired arts, universal virtues, and rhetorical prowess—for transcending brute vulnerability toward ordered civilization, without reliance on predestined fate or capricious gods. Cities emerged not as divine artifacts but as products of iterative human contrivance: crafts mitigated environmental perils, virtues curbed internal anarchy, and rhetoric optimized decision-making amid incomplete knowledge, yielding empirical gains in stability and prosperity observable in fifth-century Athens's expansion from tribal origins to imperial hub by circa 450 BCE.

Texts and Evidence

Attributed Works

Protagoras composed numerous works, estimated at nine to eleven books in total, covering a broad range of topics from theoretical inquiries to practical disciplines reflective of sophistic expertise in rhetoric, ethics, and applied knowledge. Ancient catalogs, particularly that preserved by Diogenes Laertius, attribute to him titles such as Of Wrestling, indicating treatises on physical training and technique; On Mathematics, addressing quantitative reasoning; Of the State, exploring political organization and governance; Of Ambition, likely examining human motivations and virtues; Of Virtues, focused on moral qualities and their teachability; On the Ancient Order of Things, possibly a historical or cosmological overview; On the Dwellers in Hades, delving into mythological or eschatological themes; Of the Misdeeds of Mankind, critiquing human failings; and A Book of Precepts, offering advisory maxims for conduct. These works demonstrate the eclectic scope of Protagoras's output, extending beyond philosophy to encompass statecraft, metrics, and interpretive arts like poetry analysis, as inferred from surviving title themes. Among the most notable attributed compositions are On the Gods, a theological treatise that reportedly began with agnostic assertions about divine existence, and On Truth, an epistemological work expounding doctrines on and reality. Additionally, Antilogiai (Opposing Arguments), comprising at least two books including Of Forensic Speech for a , showcased techniques for constructing contrasting arguments, a hallmark of sophistic used in debates and legal advocacy. Protagoras publicly recited selections, such as portions of On the Gods, in venues like the Athenian or at private gatherings, charging fees for access and instruction, which underscored the applied, performative nature of his writings. All of Protagoras's works are now lost in their entirety, surviving only through titles in later compilations and indirect references, with Laertius's list acknowledged as incomplete by ancient and modern scholars. The destruction of his books in following his trial for impiety in circa 415 BCE contributed to this loss, as copies were publicly burned in the .

Fragments and Testimonia

No complete works of Protagoras survive, with all evidence consisting of brief quotations (fragments) embedded in later authors' texts and second-hand reports (testimonia) about his life, teachings, and writings. These are cataloged primarily in Hermann Diels and Walther Kranz's Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (DK 80), which distinguishes A-testimonia (reports on doctrines or ) from B-fragments (direct quotes), totaling around 20 fragments and over 50 testimonia. The scarcity stems from the perishable nature of ancient texts and Protagoras's prosecution for circa 415 BCE, which led to public book burnings in , though private copies likely persisted and were quoted by successors. The most prominent fragment, DK B1, articulates the "measure doctrine": "Man is the measure of all things: of things that are, that they are, and of things that are not, that they are not," preserved verbatim in Plato's Theaetetus 152a. Its authenticity is bolstered by independent attestations, including Aristotle's paraphrases in Metaphysics 1007b18–20 and 1138b27, where he critiques it without disputing its attribution, suggesting widespread circulation by the 4th century BCE. Another key fragment, DK B4, conveys religious : "As to the gods, I have no means of knowing either that they exist or that they do not exist. For many are the obstacles that impede knowledge, both the obscurity of the question and the shortness of human life," quoted by in Against the Mathematicians 9.51 from Protagoras's lost work On the Gods. Cross-references in ( 14.3.7) align closely, indicating reliable transmission despite Sextus's Pyrrhonian agenda. Biographical testimonia derive mainly from (Lives 9.50–64, DK A1–A2), who compiles details like Protagoras's Abderite origins, apprenticeship to a leather-worker, and migration to around 450 BCE, sourced from earlier writers such as and . Philostratus's Lives of the Sophists 1.10.1–3 (DK A5) echoes these, adding accounts of his rhetorical displays and fees, drawn from 2nd-century traditions. Reliability varies: , writing in the CE, aggregates variably accurate anecdotes with some verifiable consistencies (e.g., Pericles's patronage), but introduces hearsay like multiple death tales (drowning en route to or starvation in exile). Philostratus, similarly late, idealizes sophists but aligns on core events without contradiction. Plato's dialogues (Protagoras, Theaetetus) supply numerous fragments and paraphrases (e.g., DK B3 on correct/incorrect as appearing so), but their adversarial framing—where refutes Protagoras posthumously—raises distortion risks, as Plato prioritizes over verbatim fidelity. Aristotle's treatments, however, offer neutral cross-checks, referencing the measure doctrine's perceptual in Metaphysics 1062b13 without Platonic embellishment, confirming doctrinal stability. Despite quotation-based vulnerabilities to alteration, the fragments' recurrence across philosophically diverse authors (Socratic critics, skeptics like Sextus, biographers) evidences a coherent core tradition, outweighing isolated biases.

Ancient Reception and Critiques

Portrayals by and

In 's Protagoras, the titular figure is depicted as a renowned who commands respect and draws large audiences in upon his arrival circa 433 BCE, confidently asserting his ability to teach (aretē) as a transmissible through instruction, much like other crafts. Protagoras delivers an extended mythological and anthropological "Great Speech" (320c–328d) defending the civic value of sophistic education and the teachability of , positioning humans as progressive beings who invented , laws, and to overcome natural vulnerabilities. However, employs elenctic questioning to expose inconsistencies in Protagoras's views, particularly on whether is unified or composed of separable parts, ultimately portraying the sophist as evasive and less rigorous than philosophical demands, though Protagoras maintains rhetorical poise throughout the confrontation. Plato further engages Protagoras's ideas in the Theaetetus, where the "measure doctrine" (homo mensura—"man is the measure of all things") is attributed to him and systematically dismantled through arguments highlighting its implications for perceptual and the instability of . Here, Protagoras appears as an for subjective truth, with voicing potential defenses on his behalf before refuting them, underscoring tensions between sophistic flexibility and the pursuit of stable, objective definitions. These portrayals serve 's broader agenda of elevating Socratic inquiry over paid sophistry, using Protagoras as a foil to illustrate how relativistic positions undermine dialectical progress, though the dialogues preserve detailed reconstructions of his arguments absent from surviving fragments. Aristotle, in Rhetoric (Book II), acknowledges Protagoras's influence on orthoepeia—the study of correct diction and linguistic precision—as one of the earliest systematic treatments of verbal accuracy in persuasive speech, crediting him alongside other sophists for advancing rhetorical technique beyond mere improvisation. Yet in Metaphysics (Gamma 4–6, 1007b18–1009a5), Aristotle sharply critiques the measure doctrine, arguing it collapses into the absurd consequence that all contradictory statements are equally true (e.g., that a man is simultaneously healthy and ill), thereby evading the principle of non-contradiction essential to rational discourse. He interprets Protagoras's about the gods (Theoi ouk ischyrōs eχō gnōnai, "I cannot know with certainty whether gods exist") not as bold but as a strategic dodge to avoid scrutiny, contrasting it with philosophy's commitment to first principles. Both philosophers deploy Protagoras as a rhetorical and metaphysical foil to affirm objective standards of truth and virtue against subjectivist challenges, reflecting causal pressures in fifth-century BCE where democratic openness to diverse opinions clashed with demands for stable civic and intellectual foundations. Plato's dramatic staging emphasizes sophistic charisma's seductive risks, while Aristotle's analytical lens dissects doctrinal flaws, yet neither portrayal prioritizes historical fidelity over philosophical utility, given the scarcity of Protagoras's own texts.

Responses from Other Contemporaries

, a fellow active in around 465–395 BCE, contrasted Protagoras's relativistic approach to truth and language by insisting on the "correctness of names" and precise differentiations among near-synonyms, such as distinguishing chara () from euphrosynē (cheerfulness), which implicitly challenged the fluidity of Protagoras's perceptual measure doctrine. This semantic rigor positioned as prioritizing objective linguistic utility over subjective interpretation, though both sophists charged fees for rhetorical training. Gorgias of Leontini (c. 483–375 BCE), another contemporary itinerant teacher, adopted Protagoras's emphasis on as a tool for civic influence but diverged by advancing ontological skepticism in his treatise On Nature or Non-Being, asserting that nothing exists, or if it does, it is unknowable and incommunicable through language. This nihilistic stance amplified Protagoras's into a broader denial of objective reality, influencing later rhetorical practices while highlighting tensions among sophists over the limits of human perception and discourse. Herodotus (c. 484–425 BCE) echoed Protagoras's in Histories by documenting diverse customs—such as Egyptian reverence for cats versus Greek norms—as evidence that societal norms vary without absolute superiority, yet critiqued unchecked through narratives of imperial overreach, where subjective perceptions led to downfall rather than unbridled validity. (c. 460–400 BCE), in his , incorporated relativistic elements in speeches like the , reflecting how arguments adapt to situational power dynamics akin to Protagoras's teachable virtue, but subordinated such views to empirical causation and factual reconstruction, implicitly limiting excessive reliance on individual or cultural measures of truth. Isocrates (436–338 BCE), building on sophistic traditions, commended Protagoras's role in advancing paid education for political excellence in works like Antidosis, yet in Against the Sophists (c. 390 BCE) cautioned that short-term, fee-based instruction risked fostering moral laxity by prioritizing persuasive skill over ingrained ethical discipline, distinguishing his own contextual from potentially relativistic excesses.

Legacy and Modern Interpretations

Influence on Skepticism and Relativism

Protagoras's measure doctrine, asserting that "man is the measure of all things," posited that truths about reality are relative to individual perceptions, thereby eroding foundations for dogmatic claims to objective knowledge. This relativism provided a conceptual precursor for Hellenistic skeptical schools, which extended perceptual variability into systematic doubt. In Pyrrhonian skepticism, Sextus Empiricus (c. 160–210 CE) explicitly referenced Protagoras's thesis in his Outlines of Pyrrhonism, critiquing it as a dogmatic form of relativity while building upon its emphasis on conflicting appearances to advocate epochē (suspension of judgment). Sextus described how modes of argument, including those highlighting subjective differences in sense data, lead to equipollence between opposing views, transcending Protagoras's individualist measure by refusing any affirmative stance on truth. Academic skepticism, emerging under (c. 316–241 BCE) and developed by (c. 214–129 BCE), similarly leveraged relativist challenges akin to Protagoras's to undermine Stoic epistemology. Academics argued against the Stoics' infallible "cognitive impressions" by invoking perceptual relativity—e.g., the same object appearing differently under varying conditions—mirroring Protagoras's implication that no universal criterion exists beyond personal apprehension. Though Academics traced their lineage to and , their dialectical assaults on dogmatism in Hellenistic debates echoed Protagoras's subversion of expert authority, forcing rivals to defend absolute knowledge against subjectivist critiques and contributing to a broader that questioned Stoic and Epicurean certainties. The revival of Plato's dialogues during the , via Marsilio Ficino's complete Latin translation published in 1484, reintroduced Protagoras's through texts like the Theaetetus, positioning it against medieval scholastic absolutism rooted in divine or universal essences. Humanist scholars encountered Protagoras's ideas as exemplars of ancient , emphasizing human over theological dogmas, which informed early modern shifts toward subjective experience in and . This recovery, drawing on Platonic portrayals, framed as a tool for critiquing rigid hierarchies, influencing figures like Montaigne who echoed ancient skeptical chains from Protagoras to in exploring the limits of human judgment.

Contemporary Philosophical Debates

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, philosophers have revived interest in Protagoras's by proposing semantic or perceptual interpretations that emphasize context-dependent truths, such as truth relative to human sensory states or linguistic frameworks, thereby sidestepping charges of universal incoherence. These readings portray the "man is the measure" as compatible with non-absolute veridicality, where conflicting appearances (e.g., wind feeling warm to one and cold to another) hold veridical status for the experiencer without entailing global subjectivism. Such views draw on Protagoras's fragments, like those preserved in Plato's Theaetetus, to argue for a prioritizing empirical human judgments over dogmatic metaphysics. Post-2020 scholarship has scrutinized Plato's portrayal of Protagoras's creation myth in the Protagoras dialogue, interpreting it as an analytic tool for defending teachable virtue through human-centered causation rather than divine absolutes. A 2022 study contends the myth serves a political function, illustrating equitable distribution of political and moral capacities among humans to justify democratic education, grounded in observable social progress rather than unverifiable theology. Complementing this, a 2025 analysis of argumentative education in the dialogue highlights Protagoras's myth as a pedagogical mythos enabling rational discourse on virtue's acquisition, balancing mythic narrative with empirical teachability evidenced by sophistic training outcomes. Critiques in recent literature link unchecked to epistemic pitfalls akin to scientistic overreach, where insistence on unassailable objective paradigms mirrors the Protagoras implicitly challenged through human-measure . For example, 21st-century discussions note how Protagoras's emphasis on rhetorical efficacy in avoids both rigid scientism's exclusion of normative pluralism and postmodern dilutions that detach claims from causal human realities. Surviving fragments, such as B1 DK ("Of all things the measure is Man, of the things that are, that they are, and of the things that are not, that they are not"), impose verifiable constraints, limiting interpretations to perception-driven realism over speculative deconstructions, as evidenced by Protagoras's practical applications in legal and ethical advising documented in ancient testimonia. This human-focused causal lens underscores progress in teachable skills, aligning with empirical data on cultural adaptability rather than endorsing unfettered subjectivity.

Philosophical Challenges to Protagoras's Views

Self-Refutation Arguments

In Plato's Theaetetus, the self-refutation argument against Protagoras's —"Man is the measure of all things: of things that are, that they are, and of things that are not, that they are not"—posits that if every appearance is true for the perceiver, then the doctrine itself cannot claim objective or universal validity. contends that Protagoras implies no one errs, as what seems true to any individual is true for that individual; yet if an opponent judges the doctrine false, Protagoras must concede it is false for that opponent, thereby admitting exists and contradicting the doctrine's denial of error. This peritropē (turning around) forces the relativist to affirm the doctrine's falsity for non-adherents, undermining its foundational assertion. The argument hinges on the doctrine's implicit universality: Protagoras presents it not as a personal opinion but as a measure applicable to all judgments, including its own. If relativized, the doctrine reduces to "what seems true to me is true for me," evading refutation but stripping it of prescriptive force or explanatory power, as it cannot distinguish verifiable facts (e.g., gravitational acceleration at 9.8 m/s² under standard conditions) from mere perceptions without objective criteria. Empirical inconsistencies arise: predictive successes in fields like astronomy rely on inter-subjective absolutes, not perceiver-relative truths, which would render conflicting observations equally valid and halt causal inference. Defenses invoking indexical interpretations—treating the as true only relative to the believer—fail logical , as Protagoras's original fragments suggest a broader ontological claim about reality's dependence on human measure, not confined to subjective endorsement. Such readings preserve personal conviction but collapse under first-principles analysis: equating opinion with fact erodes causal realism, where objective relations (e.g., cause preceding effect) enable reliable predictions, privileging instead unverifiable perceptions that vary without resolution. The thus self-undermines by denying the absolute truth it presupposes to assert itself.

Implications for Objective Truth and Ethics

Protagoras's doctrine that "man is the measure of all things" extends beyond to imply the absence of objective ethical standards, positing as a product of convention rather than invariant principles. Under this view, what constitutes or the good varies by individual perception or societal agreement, rendering moral claims provisional and context-dependent. critiqued this as dissolving ethical coherence, since it allows contradictory judgments—such as deeming an act both just and unjust—to hold simultaneously for different measurers, thereby eroding the basis for principled . In political practice, such ethical fosters an environment where supplants reason, permitting "anything goes" justifications for policy that prioritize persuasive appearances over substantive alignments with human flourishing. During Athens's democratic era (circa 508–322 BCE), sophistic teachings like Protagoras's correlated with heightened reliance on demagogic oratory in assemblies, where subjective interpretations of equity fueled factionalism and expediency over enduring norms, exacerbating instabilities evident in events like the Mytilene debate (427 BCE) and the Sicilian Expedition (415–413 BCE). Critics, including , attributed this to a broader sophistic influence that weakened commitments to absolute justice, linking it causally to the republic's internal discord amid external pressures. Socratic responses, emphasizing universal goods accessible via dialectical inquiry, counter this by restoring pursuit of objective ethical invariants, which argued undergirds stable governance by favoring reason's discernment of the Forms over relativistic convention. Empirical patterns in enduring polities—such as Rome's emphasis on amid expansion (509–27 BCE)—suggest that inter-subjective standards grounded in observable human causalities (e.g., reciprocity for ) outperform pure , which hampers collective resilience by normalizing anti-realist disputes over verifiable alignments with reality.

References

  1. https://www.worldhistory.org/protagoras/
  2. http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/theatu.html
  3. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/61/protagoras-of-abdera-of-all-things-man-is-the-meas/
  4. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diogenes_Laertius/Lives_of_the_Eminent_Philosophers/9/Protagoras*.html
  5. http://philosophos.sdf.org/philosophical_connections/profile_010.html
  6. https://www.britannica.com/place/Abdera
  7. https://repository.lsu.edu/context/gradschool_dissertations/article/1269/viewcontent/uc.pdf
  8. https://www.eoht.info/page/Protagoras
  9. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/protagoras/
  10. https://iep.utm.edu/protagor/
  11. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Protagoras-Greek-philosopher
  12. https://iep.utm.edu/sophists/
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308936563_ATHENIAN_IMPIETY_TRIALS_A_REAPPRAISAL
  14. https://people.uncw.edu/atkinsa/388/protagorasdialogue.pdf
  15. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0178%3Atext%3DProt.%3Asection%3D320d
  16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24699650
  17. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0178%3Atext%3DProt.%3Asection%3D322a
  18. https://philarchive.org/archive/GRETMO-42
  19. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/productive-knowledge-in-ancient-philosophy/protagoras-on-political-techne/0523F71C87D6A3A126B48EB710AAB96A
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348920787_Protagoras_on_Political_Techne
  21. https://research-portal.uu.nl/files/133139830/_20512996_Polis_The_Journal_for_Ancient_Greek_and_Roman_Political_Thought_Political_All_Too_Political._Again_on_Protagoras_Myth_in_Its_Intellectual_Context.pdf
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv6wgm1h
  23. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2011/2011.11.38/
  24. https://academic.oup.com/book/26768/chapter/195669264
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-the-sophists/professional-lives-of-the-sophists/F4F2D7BD64E8FA8484FFBC5CCAF124A2
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2177231
  27. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/classical-quarterly/article/protagoras-great-speech/5B1E76151A48368AF25B31E1ED474317
  28. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/platos-protagoras-essays-on-the-confrontation-of-philosophy-and-sophistry/
  29. https://philarchive.org/archive/KEEPPA
  30. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/249d68cc-0492-45ac-87cf-bde324da9535/download
  31. https://philarchive.org/archive/KEEAPA
  32. https://academic.oup.com/book/8133/chapter/153615652
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Edward_Schiappa/publication/328417012_Protagoras_and_Logos_A_Study_in_Greek_Philosophy_and_Rhetoric/links/5ebaa748458515626ca18cf7/Protagoras-and-Logos-A-Study-in-Greek-Philosophy-and-Rhetoric.pdf
  34. https://sites.temple.edu/dwolf/files/2020/06/Prodicusjhs.pdf
  35. https://research-bulletin.chs.harvard.edu/2016/11/01/prodicus-rise-of-civilization/
  36. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sophists/
  37. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/herodotus-and-the-presocratics/relativism-king-of-all/924321F2C35ABDC867F32F7C6150C0F1
  38. https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/19021/1/tiptonja_etd2013.pdf
  39. https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/10579/1/fulltext.pdf
  40. https://www.academia.edu/35496248/Relativism_in_the_Writings_of_Protagoras_and_Isocrates_Establishing_a_Primacy_of_Context_for_Contemporary_Communication_Theory
  41. https://www.woldww.net/classes/Ancient/SextusEmpiricus-OutlinesBook1-Bury.pdf
  42. https://scholar.utc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1478&context=honors-theses
  43. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2005/2005.09.66/
  44. https://philpapers.org/archive/MARMLE.pdf
  45. https://www.academia.edu/231031/A_Brief_History_of_Relativism
  46. https://brill.com/view/journals/agpt/39/3/article-p425_1.xml
  47. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.70017
  48. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387889599_History_of_Thought_and_History_of_Humankind_in_Plato%27s_Protagoras
  50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2183729
  51. https://philpapers.org/rec/MEIIPR-2
  52. https://gmgauthier.com/post/protagoras-homo-mensura-and-self-refutation/
  53. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/explorations-in-ancient-and-modern-philosophy/protagoras-and-selfrefutation-in-platos-theaetetus/37E5E95CE491003A57B19A4AA7E345C6
  54. https://scholarshub.louisiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=honors_bac_theses
  55. https://serialsjournals.com/abstract/32846_ch_24_f_-_evgenia.pdf
  56. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0174%3Abook%3D4%3Achapter%3D5
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.