Hubbry Logo
Palestinian refugeesPalestinian refugeesMain
Open search
Palestinian refugees
Community hub
Palestinian refugees
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
from Wikipedia

Palestinian refugees is located in Levant
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees
Palestinian refugees

Palestinian refugees are citizens of Mandatory Palestine, and their descendants, who fled or were expelled from their country, village or house over the course of the 1948 Palestine war and during the 1967 Six-Day War. Most Palestinian refugees live in or near 68 Palestinian refugee camps across Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and make up a large proportion of the Palestinian people. In 2019 more than 5.6 million Palestinian refugees were registered with the United Nations.[citation needed]

In 1949, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) defined Palestinian refugees to refer to the original "Palestine refugees" as well as their patrilineal descendants. However, UNRWA's assistance is limited to Palestine refugees residing in UNRWA's areas of operation in the Palestinian Territories, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria.[1][2]

As of 2019, more than 5.6 million Palestinians were registered with UNRWA as refugees,[3] of which more than 1.5 million live in UNRWA-run camps.[4] The term "Palestine refugee" does not include internally displaced Palestinians, who became Israeli citizens, or displaced Palestinian Jews. According to some estimates, as many as 1,050,000–1,380,000[5] people, who descend from displaced people of Mandatory Palestine are not registered under UNRWA or UNHCR mandates.

During the 1948 Palestine War, around 85% of the population or 700,000[fn 1] Palestinian Arabs, living in the area that became Israel fled or were expelled from their homes, to the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and to the countries of Lebanon, Syria and Jordan.[6] They, and their descendants who are also entitled to registration, are assisted by UNWRA in 59 registered camps, ten of which were established in the aftermath of the Six-Day War in 1967 to cope with the new wave of displaced Palestinians.[7] They are also the world's oldest unsettled refugee population, having been under the ongoing governance of Arab states following the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, the refugee populations of the West Bank under Israeli governance since the Six-Day War and Palestinian administration since 1994, and the Gaza Strip administered by the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) since 2007.

Today, the largest number of refugees, over 2,000,000, live in Jordan, where by 2009 over 90% of UNWRA-registered Palestinian refugees had acquired full citizenship rights. This figure consists almost exclusively of West Bank–descended Palestinians;[a] however, as of December 2021, Palestinians with roots in the Gaza Strip are also still kept in legal limbo. In 2021, Jordanian politician Jawad Anani estimated that roughly 50% of Jordan's population had West Bank–Palestinian roots.[b][8][9][10][11] Another approximately 2,000,000 refugees live in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, under Israeli occupation and blockade. Approximately 500,000 refugees live in each of Syria and Lebanon respectively, albeit under very different circumstances. While Palestinian refugees in Syria maintained their stateless status, the Syrian government during Assad's rule afforded them the same economic and social rights enjoyed by Syrian citizens;[12] they were also drafted into the Armed Forces despite not being citizens.[13][14] Citizenship or legal residency in some host countries is denied, most notably for the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, where the absorption of Palestinians would upset a delicate confessional balance. For the refugees themselves, these situations mean they have reduced rights: no right to vote, limited property rights and access to social services, among other things.

On 11 December 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations (UNGA) adopted Resolution 194 which affirmed the Palestinians right to return to their homes.[15][16]

Definitions

[edit]

UNRWA

[edit]
Palestinian refugees in Aida Refugee Camp, Bethlehem, 1956

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) is an organ of the United Nations created exclusively for the purpose of aiding those displaced by the Arab–Israeli conflict, with an annual budget of approximately $600 million.[17] It defines a "Palestine refugee" as a person "whose normal place of residence was Mandatory Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli conflict".[18] The Six-Day War of 1967 generated a new wave of Palestinian refugees who could not be included in the original UNRWA definition. From 1991, the UN General Assembly has adopted an annual resolution allowing the 1967 refugees within the UNRWA mandate.[19] UNRWA aids all "those living in its area of operations who meet its working definition, who are registered with the Agency and who need assistance"[20] and those who first became refugees as a result of the Six-Day War, regardless whether they reside in areas designated as Palestine refugee camps or in other permanent communities.

A Palestine refugee camp is "a plot of land placed at the disposal of UNRWA by the host government to accommodate Palestine refugees and to set up facilities to cater to their needs".[21] About 1.4 million of registered Palestine refugees, approximately one-third, live in the 58 UNRWA-recognised refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.[22] The UNRWA definition does not cover final status.[22][23]

Registered descendants of UNRWA Palestine refugees, like "Nansen passport" and "Certificate of Eligibility" holders (the documents issued to those displaced by World War II) or like UNHCR refugees,[24] inherit the same Palestine refugee status as their male parent. According to UNRWA, "The descendants of Palestine refugee males, including adopted children, are also eligible for registration."[25]

The UNHCR had counted 90,000 refugees by 2014.[26]

Palestinian definitions

[edit]

Palestinians make several distinctions relating to Palestinian refugees. The 1948 refugees and their descendants are broadly defined as "refugees" (laji'un). The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), especially those who have returned and form part of the PNA, but also Palestinian refugee camp residents in Lebanon, repudiate this term, since it implies being a passive victim, and prefer the autonym of 'returnees' (a'idun).[27] Those who left since 1967, and their descendants, are called nazihun or "displaced persons", though many may also descend from the 1948 group.[28]

Origin of the Palestine refugees

[edit]

Most Palestinian refugees have retained their refugee status and continue to reside in refugee camps, including within the State of Palestine in the West Bank and in the Gaza Strip. Their descendants form a sizable portion of the Palestinian diaspora.

Palestinian refugees from the 1948 Palestine War

[edit]

During the 1948 Palestine War, some 700,000[6][fn 1] Palestinian Arabs or 85% of the Palestinian Arab population of territories that became Israel fled or were expelled from their homes.[6] Some 30,000[29] to 50,000[citation needed] were alive by 2012.

The causes and responsibilities of the exodus are a matter of controversy among historians and commentators of the conflict.[30] While historians agree on most of the events of the period, there remains disagreement as to whether the exodus was the result of a plan designed before or during the war or was an unintended consequence of the war.[31] According to historian Benny Morris, the expulsion was planned and encouraged by the Zionist leadership.[32]

According to Morris, between December 1947 and March 1948, around 100,000 Palestine Arabs fled. Among them were many from the higher and middle classes from the cities, who left voluntarily, expecting to return when the Arab states won the war and took control of the country.[33] When the Haganah and then the emerging Israeli army (Israel Defense Forces or IDF) went on the defensive, between April and July, a further 250,000 to 300,000 Palestinian Arabs left or were expelled, mainly from the towns of Haifa, Tiberias, Beit-Shean, Safed, Jaffa and Acre, which lost more than 90 percent of their Arab inhabitants.[34] Expulsions took place in many towns and villages, particularly along the Tel AvivJerusalem road[35] and in Eastern Galilee.[36] About 50,000–70,000 inhabitants of Lydda and Ramle were expelled towards Ramallah by the IDF during Operation Danny,[37] and most others during operations of the IDF in its rear areas.[38] During Operation Dekel, the Arabs of Nazareth and South Galilee were allowed to remain in their homes.[39] Today they form the core of the Arab Israeli population. From October to November 1948, the IDF launched Operation Yoav to remove Egyptian forces from the Negev and Operation Hiram to remove the Arab Liberation Army from North Galilee during which at least nine events named massacres of Arabs were carried out by IDF soldiers.[40] These events generated an exodus of 200,000 to 220,000 Palestinian Arabs. Here, Arabs fled fearing atrocities or were expelled if they had not fled.[41] After the war, from 1948 to 1950, the IDF resettled around 30,000 to 40,000 Arabs from the borderlands of the new Israeli state.[42]

Palestinian refugees from Six-Day War

[edit]

As a result of the Six-Day War, around 280,000 to 325,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled[43] from the territories conquered in the Six-Day War by Israel, including the demolished Palestinian villages of Imwas, Yalo, Bayt Nuba, Surit, Beit Awwa, Beit Mirsem, Shuyukh, Jiftlik, Agarith and Huseirat, and the "emptying" of the refugee camps of Aqabat Jabr and Ein as-Sultan.[44][45]

Palestinian exodus from Kuwait (Gulf War)

[edit]

The Palestinian exodus from Kuwait took place during and after the Gulf War. During the Gulf War, more than 200,000 Palestinians voluntarily fled Kuwait during the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait due to harassment and intimidation by Iraqi security forces,[46] in addition to getting fired from work by Iraqi authority figures in Kuwait.[46] After the Gulf War, Kuwaiti authorities forcibly pressured nearly 200,000 Palestinians to leave Kuwait in 1991.[46] Kuwait's policy, which led to this exodus, was a response to alignment of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) with the dictator Saddam Hussein, who had earlier invaded Kuwait.

Prior to the Gulf War, Palestinians numbered 400,000 out of Kuwait's population of 2.2 million.[47] The Palestinians who fled Kuwait were Jordanian citizens.[48] In 2013, there were 280,000 Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin in Kuwait.[49] In 2012, 80,000 Palestinians (without Jordanian citizenship) lived in Kuwait.[50] In total, there are 360,000 Palestinians in Kuwait as of 2012–2013.

Palestinian refugees as part of the Syrian refugee crisis

[edit]

Many Palestinians in Syria were displaced as a result of the Syrian Civil War starting in 2011. By October 2013, 235,000 Palestinians had been displaced within Syria itself and 60,000 (alongside 2.2 million Syrians) had fled the country.[51] By March 2019, the UHCR estimated that 120,000 Palestine refugees had fled Syria since 2011, primarily to Lebanon and Jordan, but also Turkey and further afield.[52]

There were reports that Jordan and Lebanon had turned away Palestinian refugees attempting to flee the humanitarian crises in Syria.[53] By 2013, Jordan had absorbed 126,000 Syrian refugees but Palestinians fleeing Syria were placed in a separate refugee camp under stricter conditions and banned from entering Jordanian cities.[54]

Palestinian refugees from Syria also sought asylum in Europe, especially Sweden, which had offered asylum to any Syrian refugees that managed to reach its territory, albeit with some conditions. Many did so by finding their way to Egypt and making the journey by sea. In October 2013, the PFLP-GC claimed that some 23,000 Palestinian refugees from the Yarmouk Camp alone had immigrated to Sweden.[55]

Palestinian refugees during the 2023 Israel–Gaza war

[edit]
Aerial view of the Al-Mawasi area, where displaced Palestinians live in tents, January 2025

As of January 2024, more than 85% of Palestinians in Gaza, approximately 1.9 million people, were internally displaced during the Gaza war.[56] Some wounded Palestinians from Gaza were allowed to leave for Egypt.[57] As of 2025, there are over 100,000 Gazan refugees living in Egypt.[58]

Refugee statistics

[edit]
Destroyed house in the Jabalia refugee camp, Gaza–Israel conflict, December 2012

The number of Palestine refugees varies depending on the source. For 1948–49 refugees, for example, the Israeli government suggests a number as low as 520,000 as opposed to 850,000 by their Palestinian counterparts.[citation needed] As of January 2015, UNRWA cites 5,149,742 registered refugees in total, of whom 1,603,018 are registered in camps.[59]

District Number of depopulated villages Number of refugees in 1948 Number of refugees in 2000
Beersheba 88 90,507 590,231
Beisan 31 19,602 127,832
Jenin 6 4,005 26,118
Haifa 59 121,196 790,365
Hebron 16 22,991 149,933
Ramle 64 97,405 635,215
Safad 78 52,248 340,729
Tiberias 26 28,872 188,285
Tulkarm 18 11,032 71,944
Acre 30 47,038 306,753
Gaza 46 79,947 521,360
Jerusalem 39 97,950 638,769
Nazareth 5 8,746 57,036
Jaffa 25 123,227 803,610
Total 531 804,766 5,248,185
Demography of Palestine[60]

The number of UNRWA registered Palestine refugees by country or territory in January 2015 were as follows:[59]

Jordan 2,117,361
Gaza Strip 1,276,929
West Bank 774,167
Syria 528,616
Lebanon 452,669
Total 5,149,742

Gaza Strip

[edit]
2018 Gaza border protests, Bureij refugee camp in Gaza

As of January 2015, the Gaza Strip has 8 UNRWA refugee camps with 560,964 Palestinian refugees, and 1,276,929 registered refugees in total,[59] out of a population of 1,816,379.[citation needed]

West Bank

[edit]

As of January 2015, the West Bank has 19 UNRWA refugee camps with 228,560 Palestinian refugees, and 774,167 registered refugees in total,[59] out of a population of 2,345,107.[citation needed]

Jordan

[edit]

"More than 2 million registered Palestine refugees live in Jordan. Most Palestine refugees in Jordan, but not all, have full citizenship",[61] following Jordan's annexation and occupation of the West Bank. The percentage of Palestinian refugees living in refugee camps to those who settled outside the camps is the lowest of all UNRWA fields of operations. Palestine refugees are allowed access to public services and healthcare, as a result, refugee camps are becoming more like poor city suburbs than refugee camps. Most Palestine refugees moved out of the camps to other parts of the country and the number of people registered in refugee camps as of January 2015 is 385,418, who live in ten refugee camps.[59] This caused UNRWA to reduce the budget allocated to Palestine refugee camps in Jordan. Former UNRWA chief-attorney James G. Lindsay wrote in 2009: "In Jordan, where 2 million Palestinian refugees live, all but 167,000 have citizenship, and are fully eligible for government services including education and health care." Lindsay suggests that eliminating services to refugees whose needs are subsidized by Jordan "would reduce the refugee list by 40%".[62][9]

Palestinians who moved from the West Bank (whether refugees or not) to Jordan, are issued yellow-ID cards to distinguish them from the Palestinians of the "official 10 refugee camps" in Jordan. From 1988 to 2012, thousands of those yellow-ID card Palestinians had their Jordanian citizenship revoked. Human Rights Watch estimated that about 2,700 Palestinians were stripped of Jordanian nationality between 2004 and 2008.[63] In 2012, the Jordanian government promised to stop revoking the citizenship of some Palestinians, and restored citizenship to 4,500 Palestinians who had previously lost it.[64]

Lebanon

[edit]
Shatila refugee camp on the outskirts of Beirut in May 2019
Entrance to the Bourj el-Barajneh refugee camp in southern Beirut

100,000 Palestinians fled to Lebanon because of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and were not allowed to return.[65] As of January 2015, there were 452,669 registered refugees in Lebanon.[59]

In a 2007 study, Amnesty International denounced the "appalling social and economic condition" of Palestinians in Lebanon.[65] Until 2005, Palestinians were forbidden to work in over 70 jobs because they do not have Lebanese citizenship, but this was later reduced to around 20 as of 2007 after liberalization laws.[65] In 2010, Palestinians were granted the same rights to work as other foreigners in the country.[66]

Lebanon gave citizenship to about 50,000 Christian Palestinian refugees during the 1950s and 1960s. In the mid-1990s, about 60,000 Shiite Muslim refugees were granted citizenship. This caused a protest from Maronite authorities, leading to citizenship being given to all Christian refugees who were not already citizens.[67]

In the 2010s, many Palestinian refugees in Lebanon began immigrating to Europe, both legally and illegally, as part of the European migrant crisis, due to a deterioration in living conditions there as part of the Syrian civil war. In December 2015, sources told Al Jazeera that thousands of Palestinians were fleeing to Europe by way of Turkey, with about 4,000 having fled the Ain al-Hilweh camp alone in recent months. Many were reaching Germany, with others going to Russia, Sweden, Belgium, and Norway.[68] A census completed in January 2018 found that only around 175,000 Palestinian refugees were living in Lebanon, as opposed to previous UNRWA figures which put the number at between 400,000 and 500,000, as well as other estimates that placed the number between 260,000 and 280,000.[69][70]

According to writer and researcher Mudar Zahran, a Jordanian of Palestinian heritage, the media chose to deliberately ignore the conditions of the Palestinians living in Lebanese refugee camps, and that the "tendency to blame Israel for everything" has provided Arab leaders with an excuse to deliberately ignore the human rights of the Palestinian in their countries.[71]

Syria

[edit]

Syria had 528,616 registered Palestinian refugees in January 2015. There were 9 UNRWA refugee camps with 178,666 official Palestinian refugees.[59]

As a result of the Syrian civil war, large numbers of Palestinian refugees fled Syria to Europe as part of the European migrant crisis, and to other Arab countries. In September 2015, a Palestinian official said that only 200,000 Palestinian refugees were left in Syria, with 100,000 Palestinian refugees from Syria in Europe and the remainder in other Arab countries.[72]

Saudi Arabia

[edit]

An estimated 240,000 Palestinians are living in Saudi Arabia.

Iraq

[edit]

There were 34,000 Palestinian refugees living in Iraq prior to the Iraq War. In the aftermath of the war, the majority fled to neighboring Jordan and Syria, or were killed.[citation needed] Thousands lived as internally displaced persons within Iraq or were stranded in camps along Iraq's borders with Jordan and Syria, as no country in the region would accept them, and lived in temporary camps along the no man's land in the border zones.

Other countries

[edit]

India agreed to take in 165 refugees, with the first group arriving in March 2006. Generally, they were unable to find work in India as they spoke only Arabic though some found employment with UNHCR's non-governmental partners. All of them were provided with free access to public hospitals. Of the 165 refugees, 137 of them later found clearance for resettlement in Sweden.[73] In November 2006, 54 were granted asylum in Canada, and in 2007, some 200 were accepted for resettlement in Sweden and Iceland, and Brazil agreed to take 100.[74][75]

In 2009, significant numbers of these refugees were allowed to resettle abroad. More than 1,000 were accepted by various countries in Europe and South America, and an additional 1,350 were cleared for resettlement in the United States.[76][77] Another 68 were allowed to resettle in Australia.[78] However, the majority of Palestine refugees strongly oppose resettlement and much rather want to return to their homes in the region of Palestine.[79]

Positions

[edit]

On 11 December 1948 the United Nations General Assembly discussed Bernadotte's report and passed a resolution: "that refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbour should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date."[80] This General Assembly article 11 of Resolution 194 has been annually re-affirmed.[15][81]

Israeli views

[edit]

The Jewish Agency promised to the UN before 1948 that Palestinian Arabs would become full citizens of the State of Israel,[82] and the Israeli declaration of independence invited the Arab inhabitants of Israel to "full and equal citizenship".[83] In practice, Israel does not grant citizenship to the refugees, as it does to those Arabs who continue to reside in its borders. The 1947 Partition Plan determined citizenship based on residency, such that Arabs and Jews residing in Palestine but not in Jerusalem would obtain citizenship in the state in which they are resident. Professor of Law at Boston University Susan Akram, Omar Barghouti and Ilan Pappé have argued that Palestinian refugees from the envisioned Jewish State were entitled to normal Israeli citizenship based on laws of state succession.[84][85]

Following the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel gained control over a substantial number of refugee camps in the territories it captured from Egypt and Jordan. The Israeli government attempted to resettle them permanently by initiating a subsidized "build-your-own home" program. Israel provided land for refugees who chose to participate; the Palestinians bought building materials on credit and built their own houses, usually with friends. Israel provided the new neighborhoods with necessary services, such as schools and sewers.[86] The United Nations General Assembly passed Resolutions 31/15 and 34/52, which condemned the program as a violation of the refugees' "inalienable right of return", and called upon Israel to stop the program.[87] Thousands of refugees were resettled into various neighborhoods, but the program was suspended due to pressure from the PLO.[86]

Arab states

[edit]

Most Palestinian refugees live either in the West Bank or Gaza Strip, or the three original "host countries" of Jordan, Lebanon and Syria who unwillingly accepted the first wave of refugees in 1948; these refugees are supported by UNRWA. The small number of refugees who settled in Egypt or Iraq were supported directly by those countries' governments. Over the last seven decades, a number of refugees have migrated to other Arab states, particularly the Arab states of the Gulf, primarily as economic migrants.[88]

Arab states' view of Palestinian refugees has varied over time. Arab governments have often supported the refugees in the name of Arab unity, or because they viewed the Palestinians as an important source of skilled human capital to support their economic development. However, Arab governments have also frequently "despised" the Palestinian refugees – either viewing them as a threat to demographic balance (as in Lebanon), or because of the "political message of freedom and emancipation that their ‘Palestinian-ness’ carried", or else because in some countries' history Palestinians have been "somewhat associated with strife and unrest".[89]

Palestinian refugees have taken citizenship in other Arab states, most notably in Jordan. However, the conferring of citizenship is a sensitive topic, as "it is often perceived as allowing Israel to evade its responsibility towards the refugees".[90] On 17 October 2023 during the Gaza war, Jordan's king Abdullah warned against pushing refugees into Egypt or Jordan, adding that the humanitarian situation must to be dealt with inside Gaza and the West Bank: "That is a red line, because I think that is the plan by certain of the usual suspects to try and create de facto issues on the ground. No refugees in Jordan, no refugees in Egypt."[91]

Tashbih Sayyed, a fellow of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, criticized Arab nations of violating human rights and making the children and grandchildren of Palestinian refugees second class citizens in Lebanon, Syria, or the Gulf States, and said that the UNRWA Palestine refugees "cling to the illusion that defeating the Jews will restore their dignity".[92]

Palestinian views

[edit]

Most Palestine refugees claim a Palestinian right of return. In lack of an own country, their claim is based on Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which declares that "Everyone has the right to leave any country including his own, and to return to his country", although it has been argued that the term only applies to citizens or nationals of that country. Although all Arab League members at the time (1948) – Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen – voted against the resolution,[93] they also cite the article 11 of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194, which "Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return [...]."[81] However it is currently a matter of dispute whether Resolution 194 referred only to the estimated 50,000 remaining Palestine refugees from the 1948 Palestine War, or additionally to their UNRWA-registered 4,950,000 descendants. The Palestinian National Authority supports this claim, and has been prepared to negotiate its implementation at the various peace talks. Both Fatah and Hamas hold a strong position for a claimed right of return, with Fatah being prepared to give ground on the issue while Hamas is not.[94]

However, a report in Lebanon's Daily Star newspaper in which Abdullah Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah, the Palestinian ambassador to Lebanon and the chairman of the Palestinian Legislative Council's Political and Parliamentary Affairs committees,[95] said the proposed future Palestinian state would not be issuing Palestinian passports to UNRWA Palestine refugees – even refugees living in the West Bank and Gaza.

An independent poll by Khalil Shikaki was conducted in 2003 with 4,500 Palestinian refugee families of Gaza, West Bank, Jordan and Lebanon. It showed that the majority (54%) would accept a financial compensation and a place to live in West Bank or Gaza in place of returning to the exact place in modern-day Israel where they or their ancestors lived (this possibility of settlement is contemplated in the Resolution 194). Only 10% said they would live in Israel if given the option. The other third said they would prefer to live in other countries, or rejected the terms described.[96] However, the poll has been criticized as "methodologically problematic" and "rigged".[97] In 2003, nearly a hundred refugee organizations and NGOs in Lebanon denounced Shikaki's survey, as no local organization was aware of its implementation in Lebanon.[98]

In a 2 January 2005 opinion poll conducted by the Palestinian Association for Human Rights involving Palestinian refugees in Lebanon:[99]

  • 96% refused to give up their right of return
  • 3% answered contrary
  • 1% did not answer

The Oslo Accords

[edit]

Upon signing the Oslo Accords in 1993, Israel, the EU and the US recognized PLO as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. In return, Yasser Arafat recognized the State of Israel and renounced terrorism. At the time, the accords were celebrated as a historic breakthrough. In accordance with these agreements, the Palestinian refugees began to be governed by an autonomous Palestinian Authority, and the parties agreed to negotiate the permanent status of the refugees, as early as 1996. However, events have halted the phasing process and made the likelihood of a future sovereign Palestinian state uncertain.[100] In another development, a rift developed between Fatah in the West-Bank and Hamas in Gaza after Hamas won the 2006 elections. Among other differences, Fatah officially recognizes the Oslo Accords with Israel, whereas Hamas does not.

United States

[edit]

As of May 2012, the United States Senate Appropriations Committee approved a definition of a Palestine refugee to include only those original Palestine refugees who were actually displaced between June 1946 and May 1948, resulting in an estimated number of 30,000.[101]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Palestinian refugees are the and their descendants displaced from areas of that became during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, a conflict initiated by the invasion of newly independent by neighboring states following their rejection of the Partition Plan. Approximately 700,000 individuals fled or were expelled amid the fighting, with causes including direct military actions, fear induced by warfare, destruction of villages, and orders from leaders to evacuate for anticipated quick victories. Unlike the standard refugee framework under the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), which does not confer hereditary status and emphasizes resettlement or repatriation, Palestinian refugee status is uniquely passed down through generations by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), established in 1949 to provide relief. As of 2023, UNRWA registers over 5.9 million Palestinian refugees, primarily in Jordan (where many hold citizenship), the Gaza Strip, West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria, with services including education, health care, and camps that have housed generations. The protracted refugee situation, marked by demands for a "" to that would alter its demographic composition, remains a core issue in the Arab-Israeli conflict, with criticized for perpetuating dependency rather than fostering integration and for documented ties between its personnel and militant groups like . Integration has varied: granted citizenship to most, while and impose restrictions that exacerbate socioeconomic challenges. Empirical analyses highlight how the hereditary definition, absent in other global refugee cases, sustains political leverage at the expense of practical solutions.

UNRWA's Unique Mandate and Hereditary Status

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) was established by General Assembly Resolution 302 (IV) on December 8, 1949, to provide direct relief and works programs to Palestinian refugees displaced during the Arab-Israeli War. Its operational mandate, renewed periodically by the General Assembly, focuses on delivering essential services such as education, healthcare, and social assistance in five areas of operation: , , , the , and the , including . Unlike the High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), which has a statutory mandate for international protection and pursuing durable solutions like voluntary repatriation, local integration, or third-country resettlement under the 1951 Refugee Convention, UNRWA's framework emphasizes ongoing humanitarian aid without authority to implement resettlement or comprehensive protection measures. This distinction arises from UNRWA's administrative definition of a "Palestine refugee," which originally targeted approximately 750,000 individuals whose normal residence was in between June 1, 1946, and May 15, , and who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the conflict. A core element of UNRWA's unique approach is the hereditary transmission of refugee registration to , which perpetuates eligibility for agency services across generations. Under UNRWA policy, the status extends patrilineally to children and grandchildren of registered male , including legally adopted children, provided they are registered with the agency and reside in its areas of operation or meet specific criteria for those abroad. This has resulted in the registered population expanding to over 5.9 million by 2023, far exceeding the original 1948 displaced figure, as each new generation born to registered becomes eligible without requiring independent assessment of personal displacement or ongoing need. While UNRWA maintains that this practice aligns with the international principle of family unity and is not exclusive to —citing UNHCR precedents for including dependents—critics, including reports to the , highlight that it institutionalizes refugee status indefinitely, even for individuals who have acquired citizenship elsewhere or integrated into host societies, such as over 2 million holding Jordanian passports. In contrast, UNHCR typically ceases refugee status for subsequent generations once durable solutions are achieved or conditions change, preventing perpetual registration absent active persecution. This hereditary mechanism, codified in UNRWA's Consolidated Registration and Eligibility Report framework since the , requires family units to maintain registration through periodic reporting of vital events like births and marriages via platforms such as the eUNRWA system launched in 2023. Registration does not confer formal status under the 1951 Convention but grants access to UNRWA services, which function quasi-governmentally in host territories lacking full state sovereignty. This setup has drawn scrutiny for potentially discouraging or economic self-sufficiency, as eligibility ties benefits to maintained identity, differing from UNHCR's emphasis on ending dependency through integration. For instance, in , where Palestinian face legal barriers to , UNRWA's model sustains a distinct administrative category, while in , registered descendants retain dual status despite formal . UNRWA defends the system as necessary given the unresolved political context, but analyses note it uniquely expands the cohort over time without mechanisms for delisting settled populations, contributing to a registered figure that includes third- and fourth-generation individuals never personally displaced.

Comparison to Standard Refugee Definitions under UNHCR

The standard definition of a refugee under the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), as established by Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, applies to any person who, "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country." This definition requires an individualized assessment of persecution risk and mandates that refugees be located outside their country of origin or habitual residence. Refugee status under UNHCR is not hereditary; it is not automatically transferred to descendants unless those descendants independently meet the criteria, such as facing a similar well-founded fear of persecution. Furthermore, UNHCR's mandate emphasizes durable solutions, including voluntary repatriation when conditions allow, local integration in host countries, or resettlement in third countries, aiming to end refugee status once protection needs cease. In contrast, the Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East () defines Palestine refugees as "persons whose normal place of residence was during the period 1 1946 to 15 May 1948 and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict," extended to include descendants of such persons and those displaced in the 1967 . This operational definition, established by UN General Assembly Resolution 302 (IV) in 1949 and codified in UNRWA's 1952 regulations, encompasses broader displacement due to war and loss of livelihood, rather than strictly persecution-based fear, and applies even to individuals residing within the or —territories considered part of the area of origin—thus including what would otherwise qualify as internally displaced persons (IDPs) under UNHCR standards. UNRWA's refugee status is explicitly hereditary, passing patrilineally (and, under family unity principles, to spouses and children regardless of gender in certain cases), resulting in automatic registration of descendants without requiring demonstration of ongoing risk; this has expanded the registered from approximately 750,000 in 1950 to over 5.9 million as of 2023. These divergences stem from UNRWA's separate mandate under Resolution 194 (III) of 1948, which excludes from direct UNHCR oversight to avoid overlap, prioritizing humanitarian assistance and services (, , relief) over or resolution of status. Unlike UNHCR, lacks authority to pursue durable solutions such as mass resettlement or integration that would terminate status, perpetuating the category across generations even in cases of acquisition in host states like , where over 2 million registered refugees hold full citizenship yet retain eligibility. This framework has been criticized for institutionalizing refugeehood indefinitely, contrasting with UNHCR's cessation clauses that end status upon significant changes in origin conditions or effective elsewhere, as applied to other protracted situations like those from or . If were reclassified under UNHCR standards, many—particularly descendants born and raised in host countries or territories without individualized persecution fears—would not qualify as refugees, potentially reducing the caseload substantially.

Arab and Palestinian Conceptions of Refugeehood

In Arab and Palestinian discourse, refugeehood for is conceptualized not as a temporary status resolved through integration or resettlement, but as a perpetual condition tied to an inalienable collective to pre-1948 homes and properties within the territory of modern , encompassing both original displacees and all subsequent descendants. This view stems from interpretations of 194 (1948), which called for refugees willing to live at peace with neighbors to be permitted return and compensation, a provision and Arab states invoke to assert a demographic reclamation rather than individual humanitarian relief. Palestinian organizations like the (PLO) and later the Palestinian Authority have maintained this hereditary framework, rejecting definitions that would limit status to first-generation individuals or those facing ongoing persecution, as it aligns with national narratives framing displacement as an unresolved injustice demanding reversal over assimilation elsewhere. Arab host states have reinforced this conception through policies that preserve Palestinian distinctiveness, treating refugees as a transient Arab population awaiting repatriation rather than permanent residents deserving full civic incorporation. The League of Arab States' Casablanca Protocol (1965) exemplifies this by mandating equitable treatment in employment, welfare, and travel for Palestinians in member states, while explicitly prohibiting measures leading to assimilation or loss of national identity, thereby subordinating individual rights to the collective political goal of return. This approach, articulated in Arab League resolutions since the 1950s, positions refugee camps as provisional holding areas to sustain pressure on Israel, with naturalization viewed as tantamount to endorsing the 1947 partition plan and forfeiting territorial claims. Exceptions exist, such as Jordan's 1954 grant of to most within its borders following the 1948-1949 , yet even there, many retain UNRWA-registered status and agitate for return, reflecting the enduring primacy of the non-integrative paradigm across Arab societies. In and , legal barriers explicitly bar to avert demographic shifts or internal destabilization, framing as tools in the broader Arab-Israeli conflict rather than beneficiaries of host-state . This conception has perpetuated generational dependency on international aid agencies like , whose operational definition—mirroring the Arab-Palestinian emphasis on descent—expands the registered population to over 5.9 million as of 2023, far exceeding standard metrics and embedding refugeehood as a heritable identity rather than a resolvable legal category. Critics from policy analyses note that such policies, while politically expedient for Arab regimes, have confined to marginalized enclaves, prioritizing symbolic over practical rehabilitation.

Historical Causes of Displacement

1948 Arab-Israeli War: Arab Rejectionism and Resulting Exodus

The United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 181 on November 29, 1947, proposing the partition of Mandatory Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem under international administration. The Jewish Agency accepted the plan, despite its allocation of less than 56% of the land to the Jewish state amid a smaller Jewish population. In contrast, the Arab Higher Committee, representing Palestinian Arabs, rejected the resolution outright on December 1, 1947, denouncing it as unjust and a violation of Arab rights, while Arab states echoed this stance and threatened military intervention to prevent its implementation. This rejection precipitated immediate violence, initiating a civil war phase from December 1947, characterized by Arab attacks on Jewish communities and retaliatory actions, which eroded Palestinian Arab social structures and prompted early elite flight. Following Israel's declaration of independence on May 14, 1948, armies from , , , , and invaded the former Mandate territory the next day, aiming to nullify the partition and establish Arab control. Palestinian Arab forces, fragmented and lacking unified command under the , collapsed amid these events, with irregulars retreating and abandoning positions, fostering widespread panic and displacement. The ensuing battles, including Israeli offensives like in April 1948 to lift the siege, resulted in the abandonment of hundreds of Arab villages as combatants and civilians fled advancing forces, often without direct expulsion but driven by fear of combat and societal breakdown. Arab rejection of partition thus catalyzed a , inverting initial Arab advantages into decisive defeats by mid-1948, as invading armies proved uncoordinated and Palestinian leadership proved ineffective. Contributing to the exodus, local Arab National Committees and the Higher Committee issued evacuation orders in several areas to remove non-combatants ahead of expected fighting or to clear paths for Arab armies, as documented in cases like Issawiya (evacuated March 30, 1948, on Higher Committee command) and other suburbs ordered emptied by April 22, 1948. Historian , drawing on declassified Israeli archives and Arab sources, identifies such directives in dozens of localities, alongside irregular Arab broadcasts urging temporary flight with promises of swift return post-victory, though no singular centralized order existed. These actions, combined with the flight of Palestinian elites and the retreat of units, accelerated mass departures, particularly from mixed cities like and , where over 95% of Arabs left by late April 1948 amid collapsing defenses. By the war's armistice in , approximately 700,000 to 750,000 Palestinian Arabs—roughly half of the pre-war Arab population in the Mandate—had become , displaced primarily to Gaza, the , , , and . This exodus stemmed causally from the Arabs' strategic choice of confrontation over , yielding military losses that dismantled Palestinian demographic presence in the emergent , with anticipating upon Arab triumph that never materialized. Arab states' post-war refusal to integrate these populations, viewing them as a lever against , perpetuated their status, contrasting with Jewish from Arab countries who were absorbed by .

1967 Six-Day War and Additional Flight

The , fought from June 5 to June 10, 1967, stemmed from Arab military mobilizations and threats against , including Egypt's closure of the Straits of Tiran and expulsion of UN peacekeepers, prompting Israel's preemptive airstrikes on Egyptian airfields. joined the conflict on June 5 despite Israeli appeals for neutrality, shelling and advancing from the , which had not previously controlled. By June 7, Israeli forces had captured the , including , and from Jordanian and Egyptian administration, respectively, ending the fighting after Syrian attacks from the . The war triggered a secondary exodus of Palestinians, with estimates ranging from 200,000 to 325,000 individuals displaced from the and Gaza, joining the earlier 1948 refugee population. later registered many as "1967 refugees," distinct from the 1948 cohort, with their descendants numbering around 950,000 by the early 2010s. Most fled westward areas of the toward the Jordan River, crossing the (also known as King Hussein Bridge) to the East Bank of , while smaller numbers moved eastward within the or from Gaza toward before borders closed. absorbed the bulk, straining its resources amid the influx during active combat phases. Displacement occurred amid intense urban fighting in places like Jenin, Nablus, and Jerusalem, driven by civilian panic rather than systematic Israeli expulsion policies. Jordanian radio broadcasts explicitly urged residents to remain, countering flight impulses and indicating no coordinated Arab evacuation directives as in 1948. Post-war, offered return options to many who had fled temporarily, though several hundred thousand did not reclaim residency, contributing to long-term status under UNRWA's framework. This exodus exacerbated Jordan's demographic shifts, with comprising a significant portion of its , and highlighted the war's origins in Arab-initiated escalations rather than unprovoked Israeli aggression.

Post-1967 Expulsions: Kuwait Gulf War, Syria Civil War, and Iraq

Following the on August 2, 1990, and the subsequent coalition liberation of by February 28, 1991, authorities initiated a campaign of mass expulsions targeting residents, whom they accused of collaborating with Saddam Hussein's regime due to the Palestine Liberation Organization's (PLO) public support for under . Between March and June 1991, methods including denial of residency renewals, arbitrary arrests, and without forced out an estimated 200,000 to 400,000 —comprising most of the pre-war population of 400,000–450,000—who had previously formed a significant expatriate workforce in . Approximately 360,000 of those expelled initially transited to , with around 300,000 remaining there, exacerbating 's refugee burden and contributing to economic strain without formal refugee status under UNHCR standards. This episode marked the largest single of from an Arab host country, driven by retribution rather than conflict directly involving , and resulted in the revocation of residency rights for survivors, with only gradual normalization in relations by 2015. In , the erupting in March 2011 severely disrupted the approximately 500,000 , many residing in 10 official camps including Yarmouk near , leading to widespread secondary displacement rather than systematic state expulsions akin to . Yarmouk, originally sheltering over 160,000 , endured a regime siege from July 2013 that induced and , killing at least 200 civilians by barrel bombings and aid blockades, while rebel factions and later ISIS incursions from April 2015 displaced tens of thousands more through combat and forced evacuations. By 2021, around 160,000 residents had fled the camp entirely, with many relocating internally to other Syrian areas or externally to and , though Palestinian neutrality efforts collapsed as some factions aligned with rebels, drawing regime reprisals. reported over 90% of Yarmouk's remaining population displaced by extremist takeovers in 2015, compounding pre-war precarity without citizenship and limiting legal flight options, thus framing this as a "new Nakba" of repeated exile amid crossfire rather than targeted . Post-2003 in , the U.S.-led invasion and fall of Saddam Hussein's regime on April 9, 2003, triggered backlash against an estimated 34,000 who had enjoyed state privileges under Saddam—including and immunity from —due to perceptions of their favoritism as symbols of Ba'athist loyalty. Evictions from government-provided apartments began within days, orchestrated by Shiite militias and mobs who seized properties, subjected families to arbitrary arrests, , and killings, displacing thousands by mid-2003 as UNHCR registered about 23,000 in alone amid undercounting. By 2006, over 2,000 families had fled to border camps like in and al-Hol in , enduring squalid conditions with minimal aid, as host states refused entry and resettlement lagged despite UNHCR efforts to relocate around 15,000 to third countries like and by 2009. This wave stemmed from sectarian retribution and property grabs post-regime collapse, not war displacement per se, leaving survivors stateless and vulnerable without Saddam's protections.

2023-2025 Gaza-Israel Conflict: Internal Displacement vs. Refugee Status

The 2023-2025 Gaza-Israel conflict began with Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on southern , killing 1,139 people and taking 251 hostages, prompting Israel's and military operations to eliminate Hamas's and military capabilities in Gaza. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued initial evacuation orders on October 13, 2023, directing over one million residents of northern Gaza to relocate southward ahead of ground incursions, framing these as protective measures against anticipated combat in Hamas-embedded urban areas. Subsequent IDF operations expanded southward, issuing over 65 evacuation warnings by late 2023, designating approximately 80% of Gaza's territory as combat zones at various points. Hamas authorities urged residents to ignore orders and remain in place, complicating civilian movements. By mid-2024, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) estimated 1.7 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Gaza, rising to 1.9 million—or 90% of the pre-war of about 2.1 million—by late 2024, with many families displaced up to ten times amid repeated offensives and destruction. As of October 2025, following a on October 13, 2025, displacement persisted at similar levels, with over 546,000 additional movements recorded since the truce and 82% of Gaza under militarized zones or displacement orders, driven by ongoing demolitions, aid restrictions, and security clearances. These figures, derived from Gaza's Hamas-controlled Ministry of Health and UN monitoring, reflect acute humanitarian strain but have faced scrutiny for potential overcounting of combatants as civilians and underreporting of Hamas's tactical use of populated areas, which exacerbated risks to non-combatants. Under , including the 1951 Refugee Convention and UNHCR guidelines, the displacements qualify as internal, rendering affected Palestinians IDPs rather than , as no international borders were crossed en masse. IDPs remain within their territory of habitual residence—Gaza, administered by despite lacking full state sovereignty—and fall under host authority responsibilities, supplemented by international aid clusters like those coordinated by OCHA and , which provided shelter and services to 70% of IDPs who were pre-existing registered . status requires flight across recognized borders, which was precluded by Egypt's closure of the crossing to prevent a permanent exodus akin to , citing and demographic stability concerns; only limited medical and foreign evacuations occurred, totaling thousands rather than millions. Israel's controlled similarly restricted outflows, with evacuations primarily for dual nationals or critical cases, underscoring the conflict's containment within Gaza despite advocacy for broader recognition by some NGOs. This internal nature contrasts with historical Palestinian refugee waves, where border crossings to Arab states defined status under UNRWA's expansive mandate, which hereditarily registers Gaza's population as refugees regardless of displacement type. Critics, including Israeli officials, argue that labeling conflict-induced movements as crises perpetuates UNRWA's unique framework, potentially incentivizing non-integration and Hamas's strategy of embedding in civilian zones to amplify international pressure, while empirical data shows Israel's pre-strike warnings reduced potential casualties relative to norms, though aid blockages and famine risks intensified IDP vulnerabilities. By October 2025, reconstruction delays and site closures—73 in northern Gaza alone—left IDPs in precarious tent encampments, with over 390,000 post-ceasefire movements signaling unresolved return barriers tied to de-mining and vacuums.

Demographic Distribution and Conditions

Overall Registered Population and UNRWA Figures

As of June 2025, the Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the () maintains registration records for 5.9 million refugees eligible for its services across , , , the , and the . These registrations include persons whose normal residence was in between June 1946 and May 1948 and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict, as well as all subsequent descendants registered with the agency. The distribution of registered refugees by UNRWA field of operation reflects varying population concentrations, with hosting the largest share. The following table summarizes the latest available figures as of mid-2023, which have remained stable into 2025 absent major policy changes in registration practices:
Field of OperationRegistered Refugees
2,371,387
and Gaza2,474,000
582,745
486,269
Total5,914,401
Of these, more than 1.5 million registered refugees—nearly one-third of the total—reside in 58 -recognized camps, primarily in urban or semi-urban areas rather than rural settings. Registration does not necessarily indicate current residency, as factors such as , elsewhere, or death reduce the active population accessing services; for instance, in , only about 248,000 of the nearly 500,000 registered refugees actively utilize aid as of early 2025. 's figures exclude who fled to countries outside its mandate or who have acquired citizenship in host states without retaining refugee status, though grants citizenship to most pre-1988 registrants while preserving eligibility.

Conditions in Gaza and West Bank Territories

In Gaza, approximately 1.4 to 1.6 million of the territory's 1.9 to 2.1 million residents are registered Palestinian refugees with , comprising about 71% of the population. These refugees, many residing in eight UNRWA-administered camps or adjacent urban areas, face acute humanitarian challenges exacerbated by recurrent conflicts, including the 2023-2025 war initiated by Hamas's attack. Over 90% of homes have been damaged or destroyed, displacing nearly 1.9 million people into tent camps or makeshift shelters with limited access to clean , sanitation, and electricity. has surged to around 80%, with poverty rates exceeding pre-war levels of 63%, driven by the collapse of activity and aid dependency amid restricted border crossings. Refugee camps in Gaza, originally established for 1948 displacees but now housing multi-generational families in overcrowded conditions, suffer from chronic deficits, including inadequate systems prone to flooding and outbreaks. Post-2023 hostilities have intensified these issues, with mass internal displacement waves—described by Palestinian authorities as the most severe since 1948—leaving families reliant on sporadic food distributions amid reports of aid diversion risks under governance. Economic contraction, with GDP falling nearly 85% in the first year of conflict, has deepened financial needs, making refugees four times more likely to report safety concerns and six times more likely to face financial hardship compared to non-camp residents. In the , over 912,000 registered Palestinian refugees live among the 3.4 million total population, with about 25%—roughly 228,000—in 19 densely packed camps established post-1948 and 1967. These camps, such as and , feature substandard housing, high population density, and elevated risks of violence, including intra-Palestinian clashes and Israeli operations targeting militant infrastructure. stands at 29% overall in the as of late 2024, doubling from pre-2023 levels due to labor permit restrictions, settlement expansions, and economic stagnation, though refugees experience compounded joblessness from limited mobility and skill mismatches. Poverty affects food access for 43% of residents, with camps reporting higher multidimensional deprivation. Israeli operations in 2025, including in and Tulkarem camps, have displaced tens of thousands through home demolitions and infrastructure damage, fueling temporary evacuations without permanent solutions. Despite partial economic integration outside camps—many refugees hold IDs enabling work—systemic barriers like checkpoints and PA fiscal constraints perpetuate precarity, with services covering education and health for 917,000 refugees amid funding shortfalls. Overall Palestinian unemployment reached 50% by mid-2025, reflecting intertwined effects of conflict, governance inefficiencies, and external restrictions.

Jordan: Partial Integration and Citizenship Grants

Jordan hosts the largest population of registered Palestinian refugees, exceeding 2.39 million as of recent records, representing approximately 40 percent of the global total registered with the agency. Of these, the vast majority possess Jordanian citizenship, enabling broad access to , , and political participation, though an estimated 185,000 individuals of Gaza origin—descendants of those displaced in —hold only temporary travel documents and lack full nationality rights. This distinction arises from 's historical policies differentiating between refugees from the and , with the former integrated as citizens following territorial , while the latter remain in a protracted stateless condition despite long-term residence. Following the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, incorporated approximately 900,000 Palestinian refugees and residents by amending its 1928 in 1949, extending equal citizenship to all within its expanded borders after formal annexation of the in 1950. A 1954 amendment further solidified this by granting citizenship to the majority of 1948 displacees, distinguishing from other Arab host states that largely denied naturalization to preserve refugee status for political leverage. After the 1967 , extended citizenship to but excluded those fleeing Gaza—numbering around 40,000 at the time—opting instead for temporary passports that restrict rights such as property ownership and government employment. This policy persisted post-1988, when disengaged from the , though Gaza-origin residents continue to access aid and limited residency permits. Integration has been uneven, with Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin—comprising about 60 percent of the kingdom's population—fully participating in economic and civic life, including and parliamentary representation. Approximately 18 percent of registered refugees reside in one of ten UNRWA-administered camps, such as Baqa'a and , where rates exceed national averages, but many have transitioned to urban areas with access to public and healthcare equivalent to Jordanian nationals. However, ex-Gaza Palestinians face systemic barriers, including exclusion from jobs and vulnerability to threats, compounded by periodic citizenship revocations affecting thousands of Palestinian-origin Jordanians since 2004, often justified by authorities as preventing dual but criticized for altering demographic balances. Despite these limitations, Jordan's approach has fostered greater socioeconomic mobility for most compared to other host countries, though preservation of refugee registration underscores ongoing ties to the claim. Palestinian refugees in , numbering approximately 450,000 registered with as of 2023, face stringent legal barriers that prevent integration and perpetuate . Unlike in , denies citizenship to Palestinians to safeguard its , which allocates power among religious sects based on demographic balances established in the 1943 ; granting citizenship en masse could dilute Maronite Christian influence and exacerbate sectarian tensions. This policy stems from fears of altering 's fragile equilibrium, as articulated in official statements and reinforced by parliamentary resolutions. Employment restrictions remain severe, with Palestinians barred from over 70 professions reserved for Lebanese citizens, including medicine, law, engineering, and public sector roles, under Decree 11614 of 1962 and subsequent laws. While a 2010 amendment to the labor code exempted Palestinians from work permit fees and allowed access to some syndicates, formal employment still requires permits, and informal labor dominates, confining most to low-skilled jobs like construction or vending with wages 30-50% below Lebanese averages. Unemployment among Palestinians hovered at 48% in 2023, exacerbating economic marginalization. Property ownership is explicitly prohibited by Law 296 of 2001, which bans from acquiring, , or transferring beyond limited inheritance thresholds, ostensibly to prevent demographic shifts but resulting in widespread tenancy insecurity and inability to build generational wealth. A 2023 parliamentary amendment further tightened these rules, nullifying prior acquisitions and highlighting ongoing legislative hostility amid Lebanon's economic crisis. This legal framework forces reliance on camp housing, where rents are unregulated and evictions frequent. Segregation manifests through 12 official UNRWA-administered camps, housing about 45% of , characterized by overcrowding, substandard infrastructure, and de facto isolation. Camps like Ein el-Hilweh and Sabra and Shatila feature densities exceeding 20,000 per square kilometer, with dilapidated buildings, open sewers, and limited access to and water, fostering rates of 87% inside camps versus 79% outside in 2023. Lebanese control camp perimeters, restricting movement and external , while internal by Palestinian factions perpetuates armed enclaves, as seen in periodic clashes; a 2025 demilitarization initiative aims to dismantle these but faces resistance. These conditions, compounded by exclusion from , yield multidimensional affecting 83% of the per UNRWA's adjusted metrics, far surpassing Lebanon's national average.

Syria, Iraq, and Other Arab States: Precarity and Recent Deterioration

Palestinian refugees in , numbering around 438,000 registered with as of recent assessments, faced acute precarity exacerbated by the starting in 2011. Many resided in 10 official camps, including Yarmouk near , which housed over 100,000 before its near-total destruction amid sieges and bombings between 2013 and 2018; the camp's fall resulted in thousands killed, starved, or displaced, with refugees caught between regime forces, rebels, and ISIS. Approximately 400,000 Palestine refugees from (PRS) were internally displaced or fled abroad to , , or , often multiple times, as camps were weaponized in the conflict—some Palestinians aligned with the Assad regime for protection, leading to reprisals from opposition groups, while others joined militias, further eroding neutral status. Post-2024 fall of the Assad regime in December, initial returns of about 2,300 refugees were recorded by early 2025, but ongoing instability, including and economic collapse, has perpetuated vulnerability, with limited access to services and no rights despite decades of residence. In Iraq, the Palestinian population, estimated at 34,000 prior to the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, deteriorated rapidly due to targeted persecution by Shiite s and authorities viewing them as Saddam-era favorites who received housing subsidies and residency privileges. By 2006, following the Al-Askari Mosque bombing that ignited sectarian strife, thousands were evicted from camps like Baladiyat, facing extortion, killings, and denial of ; UNHCR registered over 22,000 in alone in 2003, but most fled to or , leaving a remnant of fewer than 5,000 in precarious urban squats or camps with unclear residency and no access to or employment. Recent years have seen continued , with one-month visa extensions sporadically granted by the , but exposure to ISIS violence in 2014-2017 and militia dominance has confined survivors to informal settlements, reliant on UNHCR aid amid broader Iraqi instability. In other Arab states such as , , , and Gulf countries, Palestinian communities—totaling tens of thousands—endure chronic precarity without citizenship or integration, often as temporary laborers or war displacees subject to expulsion. hosts around 100,000, mostly in , but enforces strict border closures, refusing Gaza inflows during the 2023-2025 conflict to avoid demographic shifts, leaving residents vulnerable to and labor exploitation without status. 's estimated 20,000 Palestinians, concentrated in Tripoli camps, suffered further displacement from the 2011 civil war and subsequent chaos, with militias destroying infrastructure and limiting movement. Gulf states like and UAE admit few as guest workers but grant no permanent , expelling those involved in , as seen in Kuwait's 1991-1992 of 200,000 for alleged collaboration during the ; recent refusals to accept Gaza evacuees in 2023-2024 underscore host-state prioritization of internal stability over humanitarian absorption, confining Palestinians to de facto amid economic bans and conflict spillover.

Host Country Policies and Integration Failures

Jordan's Approach: Absorption vs. Political Leverage

Jordan uniquely absorbed the largest share of Palestinian refugees following the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, granting to approximately 900,000 arrivals through a 1949 amendment to its 1928 , which extended equal rights to those displaced from areas that became . This policy extended to Palestinians after the 1967 , with a 1954 amendment formalizing for refugees and original residents, enabling their integration into Jordanian society as full citizens with access to , , and political participation. By 2024, descendants of these groups constituted around 60% of 's population, with over 2 million Palestinians registered with , though approximately 75-96% hold Jordanian , reflecting substantial demographic absorption rather than perpetual refugee status. Economic integration has been significant, as Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin participate in the workforce, military, and government, contributing to national stability despite occasional tensions over resource allocation. However, about 18% reside in ten UNRWA-recognized camps, where conditions vary but often include higher poverty rates and limited infrastructure, preserving a distinct refugee identity amid broader assimilation. Exceptions persist for Palestinians originating from Gaza post-1967, who number around 200,000 and largely lack citizenship, facing statelessness, restricted work permits, and dependency on UNRWA aid, as Jordan has withheld full rights to avoid altering its East Bank demographic balance or endorsing permanent displacement from Gaza. This absorption contrasts with Jordan's strategic use of the Palestinian issue for political leverage, exemplified by the 1970 Black September conflict, during which King Hussein's forces suppressed (PLO) militancy that threatened state sovereignty, resulting in thousands of deaths and the expulsion of PLO fighters to , thereby subordinating Palestinian political activities to Jordanian control. maintains rhetorical commitment to the and hosts 39% of UNRWA-registered refugees to bolster its custodianship over Jerusalem's holy sites and influence in Arab-Israeli negotiations, yet it has refused additional inflows during the 2023-2025 Gaza conflict, citing resource strains and fears of demographic upheaval that could erode Hashemite legitimacy. King Abdullah II explicitly rejected refugee acceptance in 2023, stating "no refugees in ," prioritizing and bargaining power over amid ongoing hostilities. This duality—practical integration for historical refugees alongside selective exclusion and issue amplification—allows to navigate domestic Palestinian influence while wielding the refugee plight as a tool in regional diplomacy.

Lebanon's Discrimination: Economic Bans and Statelessness

Palestinian refugees in , numbering approximately 489,292 registered with as of March 2023, are denied Lebanese citizenship, rendering the vast majority and ineligible for basic national rights such as voting or public office. This policy stems from Lebanon's 1994 cabinet decision explicitly rejecting naturalization to preserve the country's delicate sectarian power-sharing balance, fearing that granting citizenship to Sunni-majority could shift demographics and exacerbate internal divisions, as evidenced by historical precedents like Jordan's 1970 conflict. perpetuates vulnerability, with refugees lacking secure legal identity and facing deportation risks despite long-term residence, a situation compounded by Lebanon's constitution's silence on acquisition for non-Lebanese groups. Economically, Palestinians face stringent labor restrictions, barred from over 20 professions including , , , and roles, with some estimates citing up to 39 restricted fields as of recent assessments. While a 2010 amendment exempted them from fees, obtaining permits remains bureaucratic and favors low-skilled manual labor in or , contributing to rates exceeding 50% among working-age refugees per socioeconomic surveys. These bans, rooted in 1962 labor laws and reinforced post-1982 to curb perceived security threats from PLO militancy during Lebanon's , limit and trap many in cycles within segregated camps. In 2019, proposed regulations tightening permit enforcement sparked protests, highlighting ongoing enforcement of discriminatory quotas that prioritize Lebanese nationals. Property ownership is similarly curtailed under Law 296 of 2001, which prohibits from acquiring or transferring immovable property beyond limited allowances, effectively confining them to overcrowded camps like Ein el-Hilweh and preventing wealth accumulation or stable housing. This restriction, justified by Lebanese authorities as preventing and demographic alteration, has been amplified by a 2020 amendment further limiting secondary market purchases, exacerbating risks amid Lebanon's . Combined with employment barriers, these policies foster dependency on aid, with over 80% of refugees in as of 2023 surveys, underscoring a systemic design to maintain transient status rather than foster integration.

Syrian and Iraqi Experiences: Weaponization in Conflicts

In Syria, Palestinian refugees, numbering approximately 500,000 prior to the 2011 , faced severe weaponization as their densely populated camps, particularly Yarmouk near , became strategic battlegrounds for competing factions. The Assad regime exploited pro-regime Palestinian militias, such as those affiliated with the for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC), to bolster defenses against rebels, integrating them into Syrian Arab Army operations while portraying the conflict as a defense of Palestinian interests. Conversely, anti-Assad Palestinian groups like Aknaf Beit al-Maqdis allied with rebel forces, using Yarmouk as a base for operations, which prompted the regime to impose a brutal starting in 2012, cutting off food and medicine to over 18,000 civilians and causing at least 180 deaths by starvation by mid-2013. This tactic effectively weaponized the camp's population as leverage, punishing residents for harboring opposition while regime airstrikes and ground assaults further depopulated the area from 160,000 inhabitants pre-war to mere thousands by 2018. The escalation intensified in 2015 when the Islamic State (ISIS) overran much of Yarmouk from rebel control during the Battle of Yarmouk Camp, recruiting local Palestinians into its ranks and using the camp's tunnels and infrastructure for attacks on regime positions, thereby drawing retaliatory bombardment that displaced additional thousands. Palestinian factions' fragmentation—some aligning with ISIS for survival or ideology—highlighted how external actors, including rebels and jihadists, instrumentalized refugees to sustain frontlines, resulting in over 3,196 Palestinian deaths attributed to regime forces between 2011 and 2020, including executions and arbitrary detentions. This multi-sided exploitation perpetuated a secondary Nakba, with over 120,000 Palestinian refugees from Syria fleeing to Europe, Lebanon, or Jordan by 2021, their status further complicated by host countries' reluctance to grant full rights amid ongoing hostilities. In Iraq, Palestinian refugees, estimated at 34,000 before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, experienced weaponization primarily through scapegoating in post-Saddam sectarian violence rather than direct recruitment into insurgencies. Under , Palestinians enjoyed preferential treatment, including subsidized housing and residency rights akin to citizens, fostering resentment among Shiite communities who associated them with the Baathist regime. Following the regime's fall on April 9, 2003, Shiite militias and mobs targeted Palestinians for eviction, rape, and murder as reprisals, with at least scores killed in by 2007, framing them as symbols of Sunni-Baathist privilege to rally sectarian support. This persecution accelerated an exodus, reducing the community to about 9,000 by 2008, with thousands stranded in squalid border camps in and after refusals of entry, effectively using their plight to exacerbate inter-communal tensions and deter foreign refugee inflows. Unlike in Syria, evidence of widespread Palestinian enlistment in Sunni insurgencies remains limited, though isolated cases of involvement in attacks underscored how their vulnerability was leveraged to inflame Iraq's civil strife.

Broader Arab Reluctance: Refusals During 2023-2025 Gaza Crisis

During the Gaza crisis that escalated following the , 2023, attacks on , neighboring Arab states explicitly refused to accept Palestinian refugees en masse, citing concerns over permanent displacement that could undermine claims to a Palestinian state and the . Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi stated on October 18, 2023, that any forced transfer of Palestinians into the would be rejected by Egyptians in their millions, framing it as an Israeli attempt to liquidate the Palestinian cause. Egypt maintained tight controls on the crossing, allowing limited humanitarian evacuations—primarily for foreigners and dual nationals—but rejecting broader influxes to avoid destabilizing its domestic security and economy, already strained by existing Sinai insurgencies linked to Islamist groups. Similarly, Jordan's Abdullah II declared on October 17, 2023, during a meeting with German Chancellor , "No refugees in , no refugees in ," describing such acceptance as a "red line" that would relieve of responsibility for Gaza. Jordan, hosting over 2 million Palestinian-origin residents, reiterated this stance into 2025, including in February meetings with U.S. President , where the king emphasized opposition to relocation schemes while offering limited aid like medical treatment for 2,000 sick Palestinian children. Lebanon, already burdened with around 500,000 Palestinian refugees in segregated camps and facing economic collapse, echoed the refusal by not opening borders or facilitating transfers from Gaza, prioritizing its fragile sectarian balance and avoiding further influxes that could exacerbate tensions with Hezbollah and other armed factions. Other Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar—despite rhetorical condemnations of Israel and financial support for Palestinian aid—declined to host refugees, with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan stating in February 2025 that Riyadh's position against Gazan displacement remained firm to preserve prospects for an independent Palestinian state. Even Qatar and Turkey, which have hosted Hamas leaders and provided mediation, refused resettlement, viewing it as incompatible with their support for Palestinian resistance narratives. This collective stance persisted through 2025 amid ongoing hostilities, with Arab League communiques in March 2025 focusing on Gaza reconstruction under Egyptian plans rather than refugee absorption, highlighting a pattern where public solidarity contrasted with practical aversion to integration due to fears of militancy importation, demographic shifts, and fiscal burdens. The refusals underscored longstanding Arab state policies prioritizing political leverage over humanitarian absorption, as evidenced by limited actions like Jordan's airdrops of aid into Gaza starting in early 2025 rather than border openings. Analysts attributed this to causal factors including security risks from affiliates, historical precedents of refugee weaponization in conflicts like Syria's , and strategic calculations that mass exodus would forfeit leverage in negotiations over and issues. No Arab country reversed course by October 2025, even as Gaza's civilian toll mounted, reinforcing perceptions of rhetorical rather than substantive commitment to Palestinian welfare.

Key Controversies and Perspectives

Israeli Security Concerns and Rejection of Mass Return

Israel has maintained a firm rejection of any mass return of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to areas within its pre-1967 borders, primarily on grounds of and the preservation of its Jewish demographic majority. Israeli policymakers contend that accommodating over 5 million claimants—many with generational grievances and exposure to militant ideologies in UNRWA-administered camps—would create internal security vulnerabilities, including risks of infiltration, , and civil unrest akin to the destabilization seen in other multi-confessional societies. This stance aligns with 's interpretation of UN Resolution 194, which it views as non-binding and not mandating unrestricted return to sovereign , but rather facilitating voluntary or compensation where feasible without endangering state security. Historical precedents reinforce these concerns, notably the Palestinian fedayeen insurgency from 1949 to 1956, when armed groups operating from refugee camps in Egyptian-controlled Gaza and Jordanian territory launched approximately 70,000 cross-border infiltrations, including raids, sabotage, and ambushes that killed around 400 Israeli civilians and wounded 900 others between 1951 and 1956. These operations, often state-sponsored by and , targeted kibbutzim and villages, prompting Israeli reprisals and contributing to the 1956 Sinai Campaign; Israeli authorities cite them as evidence that refugee populations can serve as bases for sustained low-level warfare, a pattern echoed in later conflicts involving groups like emerging from Gaza's camps. In multilateral negotiations, has consistently offered compensatory mechanisms over mass repatriation. At the , proposed financial reparations funded internationally, absorption of a limited number of aging refugees (up to 40,000 verified cases for ), and resettlement options in a Palestinian state, explicitly excluding descendants to avert demographic swamping of 's 5.7 million Jewish population at the time. Similar parameters appeared in subsequent talks, such as Ehud Olmert's 2008 proposal for up to 5,000 returns over five years alongside $5 billion in compensation, underscoring 's prioritization of security vetting and controlled inflows to mitigate risks from unintegrated returnees potentially aligned with rejectionist factions. This policy contrasts sharply with Israel's own handling of Jewish displacement: between 1948 and the early 1970s, approximately 850,000 were expelled or fled in and Muslim countries, with over 600,000 resettled in and granted immediate , despite acute resource strains in the nascent state. Israeli advocates highlight this parity— states' refusal to integrate Palestinian mirroring the Jewish expulsions—as justification for rejecting asymmetric demands that would compromise Israel's foundational character as a Jewish refuge, while proposing refugee solutions centered on a viable Palestinian entity rather than Israel's dissolution.

Palestinian Insistence on Right of Return: Demographic Implications

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), representing the Palestinian Authority, maintains that the right of return for refugees displaced in 1948 and their descendants to original homes within Israel's borders is non-negotiable, as affirmed in its Central Council statement from late April 2025, which calls for "realizing Palestinian refugees' right to return to the homes and assets from which they were forcibly expelled in 1948" in line with UN General Assembly Resolution 194. This position frames return not merely as restitution but as a prerequisite for resolving the conflict, with the PLO emphasizing continued "resistance" until implementation. Hamas, controlling Gaza, echoes this insistence, viewing the right of return as an absolute condition that precludes recognition of Israel as a Jewish state and demands full exercise regardless of negotiations. UNRWA registers approximately 5.9 million as eligible refugees, encompassing original 1948 displacees, their descendants, and those affected by the 1967 war, all claiming return rights to sites now in proper. This figure has grown over decades due to hereditary registration policies unique to , contrasting with UNHCR practices that limit refugee status to first-generation individuals in most cases. Israel's population reached over 10 million in 2025, with Jewish citizens numbering about 7.8 million (78% of the total) and citizens around 2.1 million (21%). Full implementation of the demanded return would introduce roughly 5.9 million additional claimants into Israel's demographic mix, potentially swelling the Arab population to over 8 million—exceeding the Jewish share and creating an Arab majority in a state of expanded size. Such a shift would dismantle Israel's Jewish-majority framework, transforming it into a binational entity where maintaining Jewish as the state's defining principle becomes untenable, as the influx would overwhelm existing electoral, cultural, and security structures predicated on demographic preservation. This demographic calculus renders the Palestinian insistence incompatible with Israel's foundational identity as the Jewish people's nation-state, where prioritizes a secure majority to prevent historical vulnerabilities like those preceding ; Palestinian leadership's rejection of alternatives, such as compensation or resettlement in a future Palestinian state, perpetuates the demand's zero-sum nature. Strategic analyses note that while some refugees might opt for other solutions, the categorical claim by PLO and encompasses all registrants, ensuring the proposal's existential threat to Israel's continuity as currently constituted.

Arab States' Dual Role: Rhetorical Support vs. Practical Rejection

Arab governments have long espoused solidarity with the Palestinian cause through public declarations, diplomatic resolutions, and financial aid to entities like the Palestinian Authority, yet they have systematically avoided policies of mass refugee absorption or , citing preservation of the "" as a core demand against . This approach, evident since the 1948 displacement of around 700,000 , involved confining most to UNRWA-administered camps in countries like , , and , where was largely withheld to maintain demographic and political pressure on rather than resolve the refugees' plight domestically. Historically, Arab League decisions reinforced this stance; for instance, post-1948 protocols urged economic integration without political rights, ensuring refugees remained stateless tools in the conflict narrative, a policy that contrasted sharply with Israel's absorption of over 800,000 Jewish refugees from Arab countries without equivalent international perpetuation of their status. Leaders such as Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser framed Palestinian displacement as leverage for pan-Arab mobilization, but host states expelled or marginalized Palestinian militants when they threatened internal stability, as in Jordan's 1970 Black September crackdown on PLO forces. This pattern persisted, with only Jordan granting citizenship to most of its pre-1967 Palestinian population, while others like Lebanon imposed severe labor and property restrictions to prevent societal integration. In the 2023-2024 Gaza conflict, triggered by Hamas's October 7 attack, this duality intensified: Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi rejected refugee inflows, warning that acceptance would "liquidate the Palestinian cause," while Jordan's King Abdullah II echoed fears of forced permanent displacement altering regional demographics. Gulf states like and the UAE provided rhetorical condemnations of and hosted summits affirming Palestinian statehood, but offered no resettlement, limiting aid to humanitarian gestures amid domestic concerns over Islamist linked to Palestinian groups. Even as over 1.9 million Gazans were internally displaced by mid-2024, Arab states coordinated limited evacuations for the wounded via Egypt's crossing but barred broader migration, prioritizing border security and internal stability over absorption. This reluctance reflects pragmatic calculations: absorbing large Palestinian populations risks upsetting delicate sectarian balances, importing militancy—as seen in Lebanon's 1975-1990 fueled by PLO presence—and diluting leverage in negotiations, where the refugee issue remains a non-negotiable for Palestinian . Arab states' formal backing, such as the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative's endorsement of Resolution 194's return clause, thus serves diplomatic posturing without corresponding domestic policy shifts, perpetuating refugee dependency on and external aid.

UNRWA's Role in Perpetuating Refugee Status and Ties to Militancy

The Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the (UNRWA), established in 1949, uniquely defines "Palestine refugees" to encompass not only those displaced by the 1948 Arab-Israeli War but also all their patrilineal descendants, irrespective of birthplace or subsequent residency. This contrasts with the for Refugees (UNHCR), which applies refugee status individually and seeks permanent solutions such as voluntary , local integration, or resettlement in third countries, without automatic generational inheritance. As a result, UNRWA's registered caseload has expanded to 5.9 million individuals as of 2024, including third- and fourth-generation descendants born and raised in host countries like and , many of whom hold elsewhere yet retain eligibility for UNRWA services such as education and healthcare. This policy, mandated by UN General Assembly resolutions but not revised despite demographic shifts, effectively ties aid provision to sustained registration, discouraging host-state or economic self-sufficiency, as eligibility lapses upon acquiring full in certain contexts. UNRWA's operational focus on welfare services in refugee camps, rather than promoting durable integration or vocational leading to , reinforces dependency: for example, its schools and clinics serve primarily registered , creating incentives to maintain status amid host-country restrictions on employment and property ownership. Israeli assessments, based on captured documents and intelligence, describe this as a deliberate mechanism to preserve the "" claim under UN Resolution 194, inflating numbers for political leverage while host Arab states limit absorption to avoid demographic alterations. Empirical data from UNRWA's own reports show minimal progress toward ; in Gaza, where governs, over 80% of the population relies on agency aid, with camp infrastructures—housing tunnels and weapons—symbolizing stalled development. UNRWA's ties to Palestinian militant groups, particularly , stem from systemic infiltration: Israeli intelligence identified 1,200 UNRWA staff in Gaza as members of or , including 80 school principals or deputies affiliated with these groups' military wings. A 2024 UN Office of Internal Oversight Services probe, prompted by Israeli , substantiated that nine of 19 investigated employees "may have been involved" in the , 2023, attacks—killing 1,200 and taking 250 hostages—leading to their dismissal, while two were confirmed deceased in the assault. alleges the figure exceeds 10% of Gaza's 13,000 UNRWA workforce held ties, with some senior leaders, like Gaza operations chief for military intelligence, employed as teachers. UNRWA's biannual screening against UN sanctions lists has proven inadequate, as it excludes —designated a terrorist organization by the , EU, and —due to the agency's non-recognition of such designations for Palestinian factions. Militant exploitation of UNRWA infrastructure is documented repeatedly: in July 2014, UNRWA itself reported rockets hidden in one of its Gaza schools for the second time, condemning the act but noting the site's proximity to displacement shelters. During the 2023-2024 , Israeli forces uncovered weapons caches, command rooms, and tunnel shafts in UNRWA schools and headquarters; a February 2024 raid on the agency's Gaza HQ revealed an underground intelligence tunnel passing beneath it, alongside servers and documents. also repurposed UNRWA aid materials, such as flour sacks, for tunnel construction under sites like . Captured records from 2024 show systematically embedding operatives in UNRWA schools, using them for weapons storage and as human shields. These incidents prompted donor responses: the US suspended $300 million in annual funding in January 2024 pending review, followed by similar pauses from , , and others; legislated a full ban on UNRWA operations in January 2025, citing irrefutable security risks. Despite UNRWA's claims of neutrality and staff vetting, the pattern—corroborated by seized evidence and admissions—indicates institutional vulnerability to militancy, undermining its humanitarian mandate.

Oslo Accords: Refugee Clauses and Implementation Failures

The deferred the Palestinian refugee issue to final-status negotiations without establishing specific resolution mechanisms or interim implementation steps. In the 1993 Declaration of Principles (), Article V outlined that permanent-status talks, to commence no later than the third year of the five-year transitional period, would address refugees alongside , settlements, security arrangements, borders, and other matters, explicitly stating that interim agreements should not prejudice these outcomes. The 1995 Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement () similarly focused on administrative transfers and limited Palestinian self-rule in parts of the and Gaza, but contained no provisions for refugee repatriation, compensation, or absorption, leaving the status quo intact under administration. This deferral aimed to prioritize confidence-building during the interim phase, yet it perpetuated refugee dependency on international aid without addressing root causes like Arab states' historical refusals to grant citizenship or integrate populations. Permanent-status negotiations, intended under Oslo's framework, faltered at the , where Israeli Prime Minister proposed limited for tens of thousands of refugees alongside financial compensation and resettlement options in a future Palestinian state, but Palestinian Authority Chairman rejected these, insisting on unrestricted implementation of UN General Assembly Resolution 194's for all claimants—potentially millions—into proper. Implementation failures stemmed from irreconcilable positions: Israel's rejection of mass return due to demographic threats to its Jewish-majority character, contrasted with Palestinian demands framed as non-negotiable existential claims, amid escalating violence from the Second Intifada launched in September 2000, which eroded mutual trust and halted progress. Continued Israeli settlement expansion during the interim period—doubling the settler population from approximately 110,000 in 1993 to over 200,000 by 2000—further undermined Palestinian confidence in territorial viability for refugee absorption, while Palestinian incitement and terror attacks, including suicide bombings, reinforced Israeli security prerequisites over concessions. Subsequent talks at Taba in 2001 yielded no breakthrough on refugees, as core gaps persisted, effectively stalling Oslo's refugee track indefinitely and contributing to the accords' overall collapse by 2001.

UN Resolutions: Res. 194 Interpretations and Selective Enforcement

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), adopted on December 11, 1948, by a vote of 35 in favor, 15 against, and 8 abstentions, addressed the Palestinian refugee situation in its Paragraph 11, stating: "Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for the loss of or damage to property which, under principles of or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible." The resolution established a United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine to facilitate implementation, but it carried no enforcement mechanism as a non-binding recommendation. Palestinian authorities and Arab states interpret Paragraph 11 as establishing an absolute "" for all 1948 refugees and their descendants, estimated at over 5 million registered with the Relief and Works Agency () as of 2023, without the stated conditions of peaceful intent or feasibility. This view posits the resolution as overriding 's sovereignty, often invoked to demand demographic reversal of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War outcomes, potentially altering Israel's Jewish majority. In contrast, maintains that the text offers a conditional option for return only to those refugees who voluntarily fled without participating in hostilities and who commit to , as part of a ; it rejects extension to descendants, arguing that perpetual status incentivizes rather than resettlement. Israeli legal assessments further contend that Resolution 194 lacks binding force under , given its recommendatory nature and the absence of Security Council endorsement, and that equivalent claims apply to the approximately 850,000 displaced from Arab countries between 1948 and 1972 without UN-mandated return rights. The has selectively emphasized Resolution 194 almost annually since 1948, reaffirming it in resolutions as the basis for UNRWA's mandate, which uniquely perpetuates status across generations—unlike the for (UNHCR), which applies it only to the original displaced in other cases and promotes local integration or third-country resettlement. This approach has not been extended to comparable crises, such as the 14 million displaced in the 1947 India-Pakistan partition or the 800,000-900,000 expelled or induced to flee states post-1948, for whom no dedicated agency or hereditary status exists despite property losses exceeding $100 billion in 2023-adjusted terms. Critics attribute this disparity to voting dynamics in the , where a consistent bloc of , Islamic, and non-aligned states (often over 100 votes) ensures Palestinian-specific invocations, reflecting institutional bias rather than equitable application of principles; for instance, post-1967 resolutions reiterated return for Palestinian displacements but omitted analogous calls for Syrian or Lebanese in subsequent conflicts. No UN body has compelled compliance with Paragraph 11 against , underscoring the resolution's symbolic role in perpetuating the dispute without resolution.

Recent Developments: UNRWA Scandals, Funding Cuts, and Bans

In January 2024, provided intelligence to the alleging that twelve UNRWA employees in Gaza participated in Hamas's , 2023, attacks, which killed approximately 1,200 people and initiated the ongoing Gaza conflict. These claims prompted immediate funding suspensions from at least sixteen donor countries, including the (which paused $121 million in annual contributions), the , , , , and , representing about 90% of UNRWA's core budget at the time. UNRWA responded by terminating the contracts of the nine implicated staff members still employed, while launching an internal investigation; a subsequent independent UN review led by in April 2024 identified systemic "neutrality" failures, including inadequate oversight of staff political activities and curricula promoting antisemitism in some schools. Subsequent Israeli disclosures expanded the allegations, claiming that up to 10% of 's 13,000 Gaza staff held affiliations with or , with evidence of involvement in weapons storage, tunnel construction under UNRWA facilities, and post-October 7 hostage holding. While some donors, such as the , , and , reinstated partial funding by mid-2024 after UNRWA implemented reforms like enhanced vetting, others maintained suspensions amid ongoing evidence of militancy ties, including a December 2024 Israeli report documenting 1,200 UNRWA staff with militant connections. By October 2025, the and had enacted permanent funding cuts, with U.S. legislation prohibiting contributions until UNRWA undergoes structural reforms to eliminate influence, contributing to a projected $200 million agency deficit for the year. In October 2024, 's enacted two laws—the to Cease Operations in and the Prohibiting Encouragement of via —banning the agency's activities within Israeli territory and Israeli-controlled areas, including and the , on grounds of and complicity in ; the measures took effect on January 29, 2025, leading to the shutdown of operations in those regions and the dismissal of over 200 staff. justified the bans by citing 's failure to prevent its facilities from being used for military purposes and its role in sustaining governance in Gaza. On October 22, 2025, the issued an advisory opinion declaring 's ban unlawful under , obligating cooperation with UN agencies for in Gaza and requiring the facilitation of 's operations despite the domestic legislation. The ruling, non-binding but influential, highlighted 's responsibilities as occupying power but did not address 's internal governance issues.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.