Hubbry Logo
PhilhellenismPhilhellenismMain
Open search
Philhellenism
Community hub
Philhellenism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Philhellenism
Philhellenism
Philhellenism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The Massacre at Chios by Eugène Delacroix reflects the attitudes of French philhellenism.

Philhellenism ("the love of Greek culture") was an intellectual movement prominent mostly at the turn of the 19th century. It contributed to the sentiments that led Europeans such as Lord Byron, Charles Nicolas Fabvier and Richard Church to advocate for Greek independence from the Ottoman Empire.

The later 19th-century European philhellenism was largely to be found among the Classicists. The study of it falls under Classical Reception Studies and is a continuation of the Classical tradition.

Antiquity

[edit]
Coin of Mithridates I of Parthia from the mint at Seleucia on the Tigris. The Greek inscription reads ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ ("[coin] of the great king Arsaces, friend of the Greeks")

In antiquity, the term philhellene ("the admirer of Greeks and everything Greek"), from the (Greek: φιλέλλην, from φίλος - philos, "friend", "lover" + Ἕλλην - Hellen, "Greek")[1] was used to describe both non-Greeks who were fond of ancient Greek culture and Greeks who patriotically upheld their culture. The Liddell-Scott Greek-English Lexicon defines 'philhellene' as "fond of the Hellenes, mostly of foreign princes, as Amasis; of Parthian kings[...]; also of Hellenic tyrants, as Jason of Pherae and generally of Hellenic (Greek) patriots.[1] According to Xenophon, an honorable Greek should also be a philhellene.[2]

Some examples:

Roman philhellenes

[edit]
See also: Scipionic Circle

The literate upper classes of Ancient Rome were increasingly Hellenized in their culture during the 3rd century BC.[6][7][8]

Emperor Julian

Among Romans the career of Titus Quinctius Flamininus (died 174 BC), who appeared at the Isthmian Games in Corinth in 196 BC and proclaimed the freedom of the Greek states, was fluent in Greek, stood out, according to Livy, as a great admirer of Greek culture. The Greeks hailed him as their liberator.[9] There were some Romans during the late Republic, who were distinctly anti-Greek, resenting the increasing influence of Greek culture on Roman life, an example being the Roman Censor, Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger, who lived during the "Greek invasion" of Rome but towards the later years of his life he eventually became a philhellene after his stay in Rhodes.[10]

The lyric poet Quintus Horatius Flaccus, often anglicized as Horace, was another philhellene. He is notable for his words, "Graecia capta ferum victorem cepit et artis intulit agresti Latio" (Conquered Greece took captive her savage conqueror and brought her arts into rustic Latium), meaning that after the conquest of Greece the defeated Greeks created a cultural hegemony over the Romans.[citation needed]

Horace's contemporary lyric poets, Virgil and Ovid, both produced magnum opuses (the Aeneid and the Metamorphoses, respectively) which were substantially founded upon Hellenic references and culture. Additionally, Virgil's Eclogues were inspired by Theocritus' earlier pastoral poetry in his idylls. The Aeneid, Virgil's story of Rome's founding myth, notably shares several similarities with Homer's earlier epics, particularly the Odyssey, one of which being both his epic and the Odyssey follow a demigod protagonist's military voyage after the Trojan War. It also was influenced by Homer's Iliad; for example, the ekphrasis of Achilles' divine shield from his mother, Thetis, was mirrored by the ekphrasis of Aeneas' divine shield from his mother, Venus.[11] Ovid's work was perhaps even more influenced by ancient Greek culture than Virgil; his Metamorphoses were inspired by the Greek epic tradition and metamorphosis poetry in the Hellenistic tradition, and its content was derived to a large extent from Greek myth and folklore, including the Trojan War. Ovid's treatment of Greek myths was so impactful for later Philhellenism, especially during the Renaissance, that the well-known versions of some myths are actually Ovid's versions (e.g. Echo and Narcissus). Soon after these writers, other Roman lyric poets such as Lucan (inspired by Greek epics with his Pharsalia) or Persius (heavily inspired by Horace with his Life) continued to exhibit strong interests and admirations for Greek literary, artistic, and religious culture.

Roman emperors known for their philhellenism include Nero, Hadrian, Marcus Aurelius and Julian the Apostate.

Modern times

[edit]
See also: Classical tradition and Classics
The Reception of Lord Byron at Missolonghi by Theodoros Vryzakis
Victor Hugo, a well-known philhellene

In the period of political reaction and repression after the fall of Napoleon, when the liberal-minded, educated and prosperous middle and upper classes of European societies found the Romantic nationalism of 1789–1792 repressed by the restoration of absolute monarchy at home, the idea of the re-creation of a Greek state on the very territories that were sanctified by their view of Antiquity—which was reflected even in the furnishings of their own parlors and the contents of their bookcases—offered an ideal, set at a romantic distance. Under these conditions, the Greek uprising constituted a source of inspiration and expectations that could never actually be fulfilled, disappointing what Paul Cartledge called "the Victorian self-identification with the Glory that was Greece".[12] American higher education was fundamentally transformed by the rising admiration of and identification with ancient Greece in the 1830s and afterward.[13]

Another popular subject of interest in Greek culture at the turn of the 19th century was the shadowy Scythian philosopher Anacharsis, who lived in the 6th century BC. The new prominence of Anacharsis was sparked by Jean-Jacques Barthélemy's fanciful Travels of Anacharsis the Younger in Greece (1788), a learned imaginary travel journal, one of the first historical novels, which a modern scholar has called "the encyclopedia of the new cult of the antique" in the late 18th century. It had a high impact on the growth of philhellenism in France: the book went through many editions, was reprinted in the United States and was translated into German and other languages. It later inspired European sympathy for the Greek War of Independence and spawned sequels and imitations throughout the 19th century.

Friedrich Nietzsche, was one of the most staunch philhellenes.[14] He wrote that: "the Greek is the man who has achieved the most", "the Greek people are the only people of genius in the history of the world", "the Greeks have never been overestimated", "the Greek antiquity is the only true home of culture" and that "the Greek world is seen as the one truly profound possibility of life". Nietzsche was convinced that "the knowledge of the great Greeks" educated him.[15]

In German culture the first phase of philhellenism can be traced in the careers and writings of Johann Joachim Winckelmann, one of the inventors of art history, Friedrich August Wolf, who inaugurated modern Homeric scholarship with his Prolegomena ad Homerum (1795) and the enlightened bureaucrat Wilhelm von Humboldt. It was also in this context that Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Friedrich Hölderlin were to compose poetry and prose in the field of literature, elevating Hellenic themes in their works. One of the most renowned German philhellenes of the 19th century was Friedrich Nietzsche.[14] In the German states, the private obsession with ancient Greece took public forms, institutionalizing an elite philhellene ethos through the Gymnasium, to revitalize German education at home, and providing on two occasions high-minded philhellene German princes ignorant of modern-day Greek realities, to be Greek sovereigns.[16]

During the later 19th century the new studies of archaeology and anthropology began to offer a quite separate view of ancient Greece, which had previously been experienced second-hand only through Greek literature, Greek sculpture and architecture.[17] Twentieth-century heirs of the 19th-century view of an unchanging, immortal quality of "Greekness" are typified in J. C. Lawson's Modern Greek Folklore and Ancient Greek Religion (1910) or R. and E. Blum's The Dangerous Hour: The lore of crisis and mystery in rural Greece (1970).[18]

According to the Classicist Paul Cartledge, they "represent this ideological construction of Greekness as an essence, a Classicizing essence to be sure, impervious to such historic changes as that from paganism to Orthodox Christianity, or from subsistence peasant agriculture to more or less internationally market-driven capitalist farming."[18]

The Philhellenic movement led to the introduction of Classics or Classical studies as a key element in education, introduced in the Gymnasien in Prussia. In England the main proponent of Classics in schools was Thomas Arnold, headmaster at Rugby School.[citation needed]

Nikos Dimou's The Misfortune to be Greek[19] argues that the Philhellenes' expectation for the modern Greek people to live up to their ancestors' allegedly glorious past has always been a burden upon the Greeks themselves.[18] In particular, Western Philhellenism focused exclusively on the heritage of Classical Greece, while negating or rejecting the heritage of the Byzantine Empire and the Greek Orthodox Church, which for the Greek people are at least as important.

Art

[edit]

Philhellenism also created a renewed interest in the artistic movement of Neoclassicism, which idealized fifth-century Classical Greek art and architecture,[20] very much at second hand, through the writings of the first generation of art historians, like Johann Joachim Winckelmann and Gotthold Ephraim Lessing.

The groundswell of the Philhellenic movement was result of two generations of intrepid artists and amateur treasure-seekers, from Stuart and Revett, who published their measured drawings as The Antiquities of Athens and culminating with the removal of sculptures from Aegina and the Parthenon (the Elgin Marbles), works that inspired the British Philhellenes, many of whom, however, deplored their removal.

Greek War of Independence and later

[edit]
Main article: Greek War of Independence § Philhellenism

Many well-known philhellenes supported the Greek Independence Movement such as Shelley, Thomas Moore, Leigh Hunt, Cam Hobhouse, Walter Savage Landor and Jeremy Bentham.[21]

Some, notably Lord Byron, even took up arms to join the Greek revolutionaries. Many more financed the revolution or contributed through their artistic work.

Throughout the 19th century, philhellenes continued to support Greece politically and militarily. For example, Ricciotti Garibaldi led a volunteer expedition (Garibaldini) in the Greco-Turkish War of 1897.[22] A group of Garibaldini, headed by the Greek poet Lorentzos Mavilis, fought also with the Greek side during the Balkan Wars.

Notable 20th- and 21st-century philhellenes

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Philhellenism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Philhellenism denotes a deep admiration for Greek culture, , and the Greek people, particularly among non-Greeks, manifesting as an intellectual and cultural movement that emphasized affinity for Hellenic ideals. The term derives from the Ancient Greek words philos ("loving" or "friend") and Hellēnes ("Greeks"), originally applied in antiquity to foreign rulers sympathetic to Greek city-states but revived in the modern era to describe proponents of Greek national revival. Prominent in early 19th-century Europe and America, philhellenism surged amid the Greek War of Independence (1821–1829), where it translated cultural reverence into political and military support against Ottoman domination. Intellectuals like encapsulated the ethos by proclaiming "We are all Greeks," linking Enlightenment ideals of liberty and classical heritage to the revolutionaries' cause. This sentiment mobilized volunteers—known as philhellenes—who traveled to , providing expertise in warfare, logistics, and fundraising; notable figures included British poet , who arrived in 1823, commanded forces, and died of fever at in 1824, symbolizing sacrificial commitment. The movement's influence extended beyond volunteers, shaping public opinion and pressuring great powers like Britain, , and to intervene, culminating in the 1827 and Greek autonomy in 1830. While philhellenism romanticized continuity between ancient and modern Greeks, fostering loans, committees, and propaganda, it also faced criticism for overlooking the revolutionaries' internal divisions and the gap between idealized antiquity and contemporary realities, as chronicled by eyewitnesses like Scottish historian George Finlay. Despite such tensions, philhellenism's legacy endures in Western cultural affinity for , evidenced by ongoing scholarly and artistic engagements.

Definition and Origins

Etymology and Conceptual Framework

The term philhellenism originates from the Ancient Greek compound φιλέλλην (philéllēn), formed by φίλος (phílos, denoting "loving," "dear," or "friend") and Ἕλλην (Hellḗn, referring to a Greek person or the collective Hellenes). This etymology yields a literal meaning of "lover of Greeks" or "friend of the Greeks," with the English noun philhellenism first attested in 1830 to describe affinity for Greek causes, though the root concept predates this by centuries in classical usage. In antiquity, philhellene applied primarily to non-Greeks exhibiting fondness for Hellenic culture, customs, or alliances, as evidenced by its application to figures like Macedonian king Alexander I (r. 498–454 BCE), whom Herodotus described as proving his philhellenism through aid to Greeks against Persian incursions at the Olympic Games of 498 BCE. Conceptually, philhellenism frames a non-native appreciation and emulation of Greek intellectual, artistic, and civic traditions, often driven by recognition of their causal role in advancing rational , aesthetic innovation, and . This admiration historically manifested in cultural borrowing—such as Roman elites adopting Greek philosophy and —or political support, where philhellenes positioned Greek models as exemplars of and individual agency against autocratic foes. Unlike mere aesthetic Hellenophilia, philhellenism implies active endorsement, including material or ideological aid, rooted in empirical perceptions of Greek achievements like the democratic experiments of 5th-century or Hellenistic under the Great's successors. Its framework thus privileges causal realism: Greek cultural exports succeeded through superior adaptability and intellectual rigor, attracting outsiders without coercive imposition, a dynamic observable from Persian satraps' defections to Roman paideia integration. Philhellenism specifically refers to an admiration for Greek culture, people, and language that often translates into active political or material support for Greek causes, most prominently exemplified by the international movement aiding Greece's independence from the during the Greek War of Independence (1821–1830), in which over 1,000 foreign volunteers participated, including figures like who died in 1824 at . This term, rooted in ancient usage for non-Greeks favoring Hellenic interests—such as Roman elites adopting Greek customs in the 2nd century BCE—gained its modern connotation through Enlightenment-era advocacy that framed Greek liberation as a restoration of classical liberty, influencing diplomatic pressures on European powers leading to the 1827 Treaty of . Hellenophilia, by contrast, encompasses a broader, more passive affinity for Greek heritage, encompassing scholarly, artistic, or personal enthusiasm for , , and without requiring advocacy or intervention in contemporary Greek affairs; for instance, 19th-century German classicists like promoted Greek aesthetics as ideals of beauty, influencing neoclassical art movements across from the 1750s onward, yet without direct involvement in political struggles. The term, less historically anchored than philhellenism, appears in mid-20th-century discourse to critique overemphasis on Greek contributions to fields like and astronomy, sometimes implying a that undervalues parallel developments in non-Western civilizations, as argued in analyses of from the 1990s. While dictionaries occasionally list the terms as synonyms, philhellenism's activist legacy distinguishes it, particularly in contexts where cultural appreciation did not extend to risking life or fortune for Greek sovereignty. Related concepts include Hellenism, which denotes the dissemination and dominance of Greek culture in the following the Great's conquests (336–323 BCE), affecting over 20 successor kingdoms and blending with local traditions, rather than external admiration; and Graecophilia, an older synonym for cultural fondness akin to hellenophilia but tied to recoveries of Greek texts, such as the 1453 fall of Constantinople prompting Byzantine scholars to bring manuscripts to . Terms like hellenomania critique excessive or uncritical idealization, as in Romantic exaggerations of ancient Greece's purity, while opposites such as mishellenism describe anti-Greek sentiments, evident in Ottoman-era portrayals of as rebellious subjects unfit for autonomy. These distinctions underscore philhellenism's unique blend of cultural reverence and pragmatic solidarity, grounded in verifiable historical actions rather than abstract sentiment.

Philhellenism in Antiquity

Early Non-Greek Admirers

The earliest documented instances of non-Greek rulers explicitly identifying as philhellenes occurred among the Arsacid kings of , an Iranian nomadic confederation that established an empire in the BCE following the decline of Seleucid control in the region. These rulers, originating from the tribe east of the , encountered and incorporated elements of Greek culture through conquests of Hellenistic settlements in and . Mithridates I (r. 171–138 BCE), the fourth Arsacid king, exemplified this admiration by adopting the epithet Philhellene ("lover of ") on his coinage, particularly in regions like Margiana, to foster among Greek-speaking subjects. His military campaigns captured major Hellenistic centers such as on the in 141 BCE, where he integrated local Greek elites rather than suppressing them, blending Parthian governance with Hellenistic administrative practices. This policy reflected a pragmatic appreciation for Greek urban organization, art, and coinage standards, evident in Parthian drachms mimicking Seleucid designs while featuring Arsacid . Subsequent early Arsacid rulers continued this philhellenism to legitimize their rule over diverse populations, employing Greek script on inscriptions and patronizing Hellenistic-style in cities like Nisa. Despite their Iranian heritage and Zoroastrian traditions, these kings' adoption of Greek cultural markers served to stabilize conquests in former Seleucid territories, marking a distinct non-Greek engagement with Hellenism distinct from the Roman variant. This approach, however, sometimes clashed with Parthian nobility's preferences for nomadic traditions, highlighting the strategic rather than ideological nature of their admiration.

Roman Imperial Philhellenism

Roman imperial philhellenism built upon the Republic's of after the conquest of 146 BC, with emperors actively promoting Hellenic traditions through patronage, policy, and personal affinity. This era saw the empire's elite embracing , , , and , as Roman children were often educated by Greek tutors and the upper classes composed works in Greek. Emperors adopted Greek gods by , renaming as while incorporating Hellenistic mythology into state religion and iconography. Nero (r. 54–68 AD) demonstrated philhellenism by traveling to in 66 AD, participating in musical and athletic contests, and proclaiming the "freedom" of Achaia at the in on November 28, 66 AD, which exempted the province from taxes but retained Roman administrative control as a gesture of cultural favor. This act, motivated by 's self-identification as a performer in Greek festivals, underscored his admiration for Hellenic artistic and civic ideals despite underlying political pragmatism. Hadrian (r. 117–138 AD) epitomized imperial philhellenism through his philhellenic policies and architectural legacy in . In 131/132 AD, he founded the Panhellenion, a league of select Greek cities (initially around 33 members, expanding to over 50) headquartered in , which organized quadrennial sacrifices to Olympios, , and cultural exchanges to evoke classical unity. Hadrian visited thrice, completing the Temple of Olympian Zeus in 131 AD after six centuries of construction, erecting the Arch of Hadrian, and funding aqueducts, libraries, and stadium renovations, thereby elevating as a . Marcus Aurelius (r. 161–180 AD), influenced by —a philosophy rooted in Greek thinkers like —wrote his personal reflections, the , entirely in during military campaigns, reflecting deep engagement with Hellenic ethical and cosmological ideas. In the 4th century, Julian (r. 361–363 AD) pursued a revival of Hellenic paganism, authoring works like to defend Greek philosophy and against Christianity, while reforming temples and promoting as imperial ideology. These efforts highlight philhellenism's persistence amid the empire's religious shifts, though Julian's short reign limited lasting impact.

Medieval and Early Modern Contexts

Byzantine Self-Perception and External Views

The inhabitants of the predominantly identified as Romaioi (Romans), emphasizing their continuity with the Roman imperial tradition rather than ancient Hellenic paganism, a self-perception rooted in the empire's foundation by Constantine I in 330 CE and reinforced through legal, administrative, and religious structures. This Roman identity persisted across centuries, with terms like Hellenes largely avoided until the late Byzantine period due to their association with pre-Christian , as evidenced in chronicles and theological texts that prioritized Orthodox Christian universality over ethnic Hellenism. However, Byzantine elites preserved and engaged with classical through (education), fostering a cultural Hellenism that informed , , and without overt self-identification as such until the Palaiologan era (1261–1453), when scholars like began reclaiming Hellene to denote linguistic and descent from antiquity amid territorial losses. Externally, Latin Westerners increasingly perceived Byzantines as (Greeks) from the onward, distinguishing them from "true" Romans and often portraying them with stereotypes of , deceit, or theological deviation, as seen in Crusader accounts post-1204 that highlighted cultural divergences like Byzantine adherence to Greek rites over Latin customs. Islamic chroniclers, such as those under the , referred to Byzantines as Rum (Romans), acknowledging their imperial legacy while noting Greek linguistic dominance, but without admiration for Hellenic classics, viewing them instead through a lens of rivalry and shared Abrahamic scriptural traditions. This external framing as "Greeks" by Europeans laid groundwork for later philhellenic idealization of Byzantine heirs as cultural repositories, though contemporary medieval views prioritized geopolitical and religious antagonism over classical heritage appreciation.

Renaissance Revival and Humanist Philhellenism

The revival of interest in ancient Greek culture during the began in the late 14th century, as Italian humanists sought direct access to Greek texts beyond Latin translations and medieval intermediaries. In 1397, , chancellor of , invited the Byzantine scholar to teach Greek at the Studium Florentinum, marking the first formal instruction in the language in . Chrysoloras, a and philologist, authored the Erotemata, a foundational Greek grammar that facilitated learning among Latin scholars, and emphasized the superiority of for eloquence and . This initiative fostered early philhellenic sentiments, with humanists viewing works—such as those of , , and —as models of rhetorical and ethical excellence, contrasting them with scholastic reliance on via Arabic sources. The in 1438–1439 accelerated this trend, as Byzantine delegates, including Georgios Gemistos Plethon, engaged Western audiences with Platonic philosophy amid efforts to reconcile Eastern and Western churches. Plethon's comparative lectures on and , delivered to figures like , critiqued Aristotelian dominance and advocated a return to Platonic idealism, inspiring the founding of the in under by 1462. Plethon's vision of a Hellenic revival, blending pagan philosophy with Christian elements, appealed to humanists disillusioned with medieval theology, positioning as a cultural of intellectual and civic . , another council participant who later converted to Catholicism, amassed over 600 Greek manuscripts and donated them to in 1468, establishing a that preserved and disseminated Hellenistic texts. The fall of Constantinople in 1453 prompted a larger exodus of Greek scholars to , intensifying philhellenic ; figures like lectured on and in from 1456, training a generation including Angelo Poliziano. Humanists such as translated Greek historians like and , integrating Hellenic ideals of republicanism and oratory into Italian political thought, while viewing as custodians of authentic classical heritage. This era's philhellenism was pragmatic rather than romanticized, driven by textual recovery and linguistic competence, yet it elevated as a benchmark for moral and intellectual renewal, influencing , , and without idealizing contemporary Greeks.

Enlightenment and Neoclassical Foundations

Intellectual and Philosophical Underpinnings

The Enlightenment's intellectual revival of positioned as a foundational model for rational inquiry, republican governance, and aesthetic perfection, laying philosophical groundwork for philhellenism by contrasting Greek achievements with medieval decline and . Thinkers drew on Greek philosophy—particularly ' embodiment of reason, virtue, and critical examination of authority—as a counter to religious dogma, viewing it as an archetype for human emancipation through knowledge. , in The Spirit of the Laws (1748), analyzed Greek republics like as virtue-sustaining entities limited by small territories and communal spirit, crediting them with originating democratic forms while noting their vulnerability to ambition and expansion. echoed this by emulating Greek tragedians in his own plays, such as Oedipe (1718), and praising ancient Greek wit for challenging , though he critiqued their historical narratives as laced with myth. These analyses framed Greece not merely as historical artifact but as causal exemplar of liberty emerging from and , influencing later views of modern as potential restorers of that legacy. Aesthetic philosophy further entrenched philhellenism through Johann Joachim Winckelmann's History of the Art of Antiquity (1764), which elevated Greek sculpture over Roman copies by attributing to it "noble simplicity and calm grandeur"—an ideal born of freedom, climate, and harmonious proportion rather than imperial excess. Winckelmann argued Greek art reflected a unified cultural evolution from primitive to perfected forms, embodying ethical and physical beauty as products of democratic liberty, thus providing a metaphysical rationale for emulating Greece in modern ethics and aesthetics. This Neoclassical paradigm, rooted in Enlightenment empiricism, rejected Baroque excess for Greek restraint, positing art as moral instruction and Greece as the empirical peak of human capability, untainted by later corruptions. Such underpinnings emphasized causal links between Greek political freedom and cultural excellence, fostering a philosophical that modern decline stemmed from abandoning classical principles—a view that propelled philhellenism toward active intervention by portraying Ottoman rule as antithetical to rational progress. Critics like extended this by tracing Europe's heritage to Greco-Roman antiquity, reinforcing 's role as secular progenitor of Enlightenment values over Christian interruption. This framework, while idealizing empirically through texts and artifacts, overlooked internal Greek divisions and , prioritizing first-principles admiration for its rational innovations.

Artistic and Architectural Expressions

Johann Joachim Winckelmann's Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums (1764) encapsulated philhellenic admiration by proclaiming as the zenith of human achievement, characterized by "noble simplicity and calm grandeur," and advocated its imitation to revive modern aesthetics from Baroque excesses. This treatise redirected artistic focus from Roman to Greek exemplars, influencing sculptors and painters to prioritize idealized human forms, poses, and mythological subjects drawn from Hellenic sources, as seen in early neoclassical works emphasizing harmony and restraint over ornamentation. Empirical documentation amplified these ideals through James Stuart and Nicholas Revett's The Antiquities of Athens (1762), the first precise survey of classical Greek architecture, featuring measured drawings of the and other monuments that enabled faithful replication of Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian orders. This publication, sponsored by the of Dilettanti, fueled architectural philhellenism by providing architects with authentic Greek proportions and details, distinct from Roman adaptations via . Notable expressions included the in (designed 1788–1791 by Carl Gotthard Langhans), explicitly modeled on the Propylaea to evoke democratic virtues, and British structures by "Athenian" Stuart, such as the Temple of Piety at (c. 1760s) and restorations incorporating Greek motifs. These designs reflected philhellenic aspirations for public edifices symbolizing enlightenment rationality and civic order, with symmetrical facades, pediments, and colonnades mirroring temple forms to honor Greek contributions to and .

Philhellenism in the 19th Century

Prelude to the Greek War of Independence

The intellectual roots of 19th-century philhellenism, which fueled European sympathy for Greek independence, trace to the Enlightenment's revival of , particularly through neoclassicism's emphasis on ideals of , , and aesthetics as models for modern society. , often credited as a foundational figure, argued in his 1755 essay Gedanken über die Nachahmung der griechischen Werke that represented the highest form of beauty and nobility, superior to Roman imitations, thereby igniting a pan-European fascination with Hellenic culture that extended beyond scholarship to political aspirations. His comprehensive Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums (1764) further systematized this view, portraying as the origin of civilized values and inspiring collectors, artists, and travelers to seek direct engagement with its legacy, despite the Ottoman overlay. This neoclassical framework, disseminated via academies and publications across , , and Britain, began decoupling admiration for ancient achievements from disdain for contemporary "degeneracy," gradually framing modern as heirs deserving restoration. By the early 19th century, infused philhellenism with nationalist fervor and emotional identification, linking ancient heroism to the plight of Ottoman-subjugated and aligning their cause with post-Napoleonic liberation movements. British poet Lord Byron's travels through in 1809–1810, amid ruins like those at and , profoundly shaped this shift; his (published in two cantos, 1812 and 1816) vividly contrasted classical splendor with current desolation under Turkish rule, evoking widespread lament for 's "fallen" state and priming readers for revolutionary advocacy. Similarly, Percy Bysshe Shelley's Hellas (1822, conceived pre-war) mythologized Greek resurgence as a universal triumph of freedom, drawing on and to bridge antiquity and modernity. European travel literature, including accounts from the extended Grand Tour, amplified these sentiments by documenting Greek resilience amid oppression—such as in Edward Dodwell's A Classical and Topographical Tour through Greece (1819)—fostering a narrative of cultural continuity that resonated with liberal elites. These currents converged with practical precursors to revolt, including the secret Filiki Etaireia (Society of Friends), founded on September 14, 1814, in Odessa by Greek merchants and intellectuals like Nikolaos Skoufas, aiming to orchestrate independence through clandestine networks spanning Europe and the diaspora. Though primarily Greek-led, the society's appeals drew tacit philhellenic encouragement from sympathetic Western contacts, building on earlier failed uprisings like the Orlov Revolt (1770–1771), which had publicized Greek aspirations during the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774). By 1821, this intellectual and organizational prelude had cultivated sufficient public opinion in Protestant and Catholic Europe—particularly in Germany, Britain, and France—for the revolution's outbreak on March 25, 1821, in the Danubian Principalities and Peloponnese to elicit immediate, if unofficial, backing, manifesting in funds, volunteers, and diplomatic pressure. Philhellenism thus transitioned from aesthetic reverence to causal support, viewing Greek liberation as a moral imperative to reclaim Europe's "cradle" from "barbarism," though tempered by realistic assessments of modern Greeks' martial disorganization.

Support During the War: Figures, Aid, and Motivations

Prominent British poet Lord George Gordon Byron emerged as a leading philhellene figure, arriving in on August 3, 1823, aboard the ship , where he organized military efforts and provided personal funds exceeding £4,000 (equivalent to modern millions) to support Greek forces against the Ottomans. Byron's involvement unified fractious Greek leaders temporarily and boosted international morale, though he succumbed to fever on April 19, 1824, at , becoming a symbol for the cause. Other notable volunteers included Scottish officer Thomas Gordon, who participated in naval actions, and French general Charles Nicolas Fabvier, who led expeditions such as the 1823 raid on . Up to 1,200 foreign fighters from across joined Greek irregulars, forming battalions that fought in key battles despite limited overall military impact. Financial aid proved crucial, with the London Philhellenic Committee, founded in March 1823 by figures like Edward Blaquiere and Jeremy Bentham, coordinating relief efforts including provisions, weapons, and loans totaling millions of pounds—specifically £800,000 in 1824 and £2,000,000 in 1825—to sustain the provisional Greek government amid Ottoman blockades. In the United States, philhellene groups outfitted eight ships carrying cargo valued under $138,000, including the Tontine ($13,856) and Levant ($8,547), delivering food, clothing, and munitions, though some shipments were intercepted or diverted. These contributions supplemented Greek internal resources strained by civil strife and funded orphan relief, with American donors arranging adoptions for war-displaced children. Motivations stemmed from Enlightenment-era admiration for , viewing the revolution as a rebirth of ancient against Ottoman "," fueled by reports of massacres like in 1822 that evoked humanitarian outrage. Philhellenes, often products of , saw parallels between Greek struggles and contemporary liberal ideals of , with religious dimensions framing it as Christian resistance to Muslim rule. Figures like Byron were driven by romantic individualism and anti-tyrannical fervor, prioritizing cultural regeneration over pragmatic , though some critiqued the idealized view ignoring Byzantine discontinuities. This support amplified in , swaying despite governmental reluctance. ![Lord Byron à Missolonghi de T. Vryzakis (musée du Louvre, Paris)](./assets/%22Lord_Byron_%C3%A0_Missolonghi%22_de_T.Vryzakismusmus%C3%A9e_du_Louvre%252C_Paris

Disillusionments and Realities of Involvement

Many philhellenes arrived in during the (1821–1830) harboring romantic ideals of aiding the descendants of ancient Hellenes in reclaiming their classical heritage, only to confront a fragmented society marked by factionalism and self-interest. Local leaders, often klephts (mountain bandits) or (wealthy landowners), prioritized personal vendettas and plunder over unified strategy, leading to chronic disorganization in military efforts. This reality clashed with expectations, as volunteers like in the encountered illiterate fighters more akin to medieval guerrillas than Periclean citizens, prompting early disillusionment. Greek infighting escalated into full civil wars between 1823 and 1825, dividing forces between mainland klephts and islanders while Ottoman-Egyptian armies advanced unopposed. Philhellenes such as Edward Trelawny and John William Bowden witnessed or were entangled in these conflicts, with some caught mediating futilely between rival chieftains like and . , arriving in in January 1824, expressed frustration in letters over the "eternal squabbles" among Greek leaders, viewing their disunity as a primary obstacle to effective resistance against Ottoman forces. Atrocities committed by Greek revolutionaries further eroded philhellene enthusiasm, exemplified by the massacre at Tripolitsa in October 1821, where an estimated 8,000 to 30,000 Ottoman civilians, including women and children, were slaughtered after the city's fall. British philhellene Thomas Gordon, present during the event, condemned the indiscriminate killings as barbaric, protesting to Greek commanders who dismissed foreign objections. Such acts, while initially justified by some as retaliation for Ottoman reprisals, alienated observers and fueled criticism in , with accounts highlighting the moral hazards of involvement. The harsh physical realities of campaigning compounded these political disillusionments, with disease claiming far more lives than combat. Epidemics of , , and ravaged volunteer camps due to unsanitary conditions and inadequate medical care; for instance, succumbed to fever—possibly a malarial relapse—on April 19, 1824, after just months in . Of approximately 1,000 to 1,200 foreign volunteers, hundreds perished from illness, including many Germans who either succumbed in the field or perished en route home, underscoring the lethal toll beyond battlefield heroics. Financial aid raised by philhellenic committees in , totaling tens of thousands of pounds, was frequently mismanaged or embezzled by Greek factions, eroding trust and leading to scandals that discredited the cause abroad. Returning survivors, including disillusioned figures like Karl von Normann-Ehrenfels, published scathing memoirs decrying the revolution's chaos, though their critiques were often overshadowed by the narrative of ultimate Greek success. Despite these setbacks, a core of dedicated philhellenes persisted, contributing to key victories like the naval in 1827, yet the era's realities tempered the movement's idealism with pragmatic recognition of Greece's entrenched divisions.

20th- and 21st-Century Developments

Institutional and Academic Continuations

The foreign archaeological schools established in during the 19th century have served as enduring institutional embodiments of philhellenism, maintaining focused on ancient Greek civilization into the 20th and 21st centuries through excavations, scholarly training, and cultural preservation efforts. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens (ASCSA), founded in 1881, emerged as the largest U.S.-based overseas center for classical studies, resuming extensive fieldwork post-World War II, including major digs at sites like and the Athenian , while offering fellowships that trained generations of archaeologists and classicists. By the era, the ASCSA aligned with U.S. in , supporting stabilization initiatives amid political turmoil and emphasizing the continuity of Greek heritage to counter ideological threats. Its Gennadius Library, established in 1922, expanded to house over 150,000 volumes on Greek history and culture, facilitating interdisciplinary that bridges ancient and modern Hellenism. Similarly, the British School at Athens (BSA), operational since 1886, perpetuated philhellenic scholarship through systematic archaeological surveys and publications, such as the Annual of the British School at Athens, which documented findings from sites like into the late 20th century. In the 21st century, the BSA has hosted conferences explicitly examining philhellenism's historical role, including a 2023 international event on British philhellenism and the Greek Revolution, co-organized with Greek institutions to foster global academic dialogue on Hellenic legacies. These efforts, alongside collaborations with Greek authorities, underscore the BSA's role in sustaining British admiration for Greek antiquity amid evolving geopolitical contexts. Academic continuations extend to specialized centers and honors recognizing philhellenic contributions. Harvard University's Center for Hellenic Studies, established in 1958 and operating a branch in since 1992, conducts workshops on philhellenism's enduring influence, analyzing its impact on identity formation through classical reception studies. In recognition of such work, has instituted modern observances like Philhellenism Day (March 25), honoring 20th- and 21st-century scholars; in 2021, U.S. archaeologists Jack Davis, Sharon Stocker, and Charles Williams received awards for excavations revealing Greek sites, exemplifying how empirical archaeological pursuits sustain philhellenic ideals. These institutions collectively prioritize verifiable data from digs and texts, resisting politicized narratives by grounding interpretations in material evidence, though their foreign-led structures have occasionally sparked debates over interpretive authority in Greek .

Political and Cultural Manifestations Post-WWII

In the immediate , philhellenism manifested politically through U.S. foreign policy initiatives that invoked ancient Greece's democratic legacy to counter communist expansion. The , announced on March 12, 1947, committed $400 million in military and economic aid to and , explicitly framing as the "cradle of democracy" threatened by Soviet-backed insurgents during the Greek Civil War (1946–1949). This rhetoric renewed 19th-century American philhellenism, adapting it to Cold War containment strategy, as evidenced by appeals from archaeologists like Carl Blegen, who in mid-1940s writings urged U.S. support to preserve 's classical heritage against totalitarianism. The (1948 onward) extended this by allocating funds for cultural preservation, including $200,000 for reconstructing the in , tying economic stabilization to symbolic restoration of Hellenic monuments. Diplomatically, Greek antiquities served as instruments of philhellenic goodwill in U.S.-Greece relations starting in the late . Greek officials gifted artifacts, such as vases and sculptures, to American presidents and dignitaries—including items presented to Harry Truman—to underscore shared civilizational roots and foster alliance-building amid NATO's formation ( joined in 1952). These exchanges, documented in presidential collections, reflected a strategic that leveraged philhellenism to legitimize Western intervention, though critics later noted they commodified heritage for geopolitical ends. Culturally, post-WWII philhellenism evolved into "neo-philhellenism," emphasizing Greece's unbroken cultural continuity and the Greek diaspora's role in global advocacy, as articulated in analyses of the . In the U.S. and Europe, narratives recast Hellenism as an ideological bulwark, with institutions like the American School of Classical Studies at promoting excavations and publications that aligned archaeological work with anti-communist . This period saw sustained academic engagement, including U.S.-funded missions like the Allied Mission for Observing Greek Elections (1946), which reinforced philhellenic ideals of fair governance rooted in classical precedents, though such efforts were pragmatically driven by strategic interests rather than pure altruism. By the late , manifestations included booms and educational programs highlighting Greece's heritage, but these often prioritized marketable antiquity over modern complexities.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Debates

Romantic Idealization Versus Historical Continuity

Philhellenes in the early often romanticized modern Greeks as direct, unadulterated heirs to , envisioning their liberation from Ottoman rule as a revival of Periclean and Homeric heroism, while downplaying intervening historical transformations such as the and Islamic influences. This idealization, rooted in Winckelmann's neoclassical and reinforced by poets like Byron, portrayed contemporary as a "" awaiting Western rescue to reclaim its ancient splendor, yet it frequently ignored empirical divergences in , , and . Upon arrival, many philhellenes expressed disillusionment, decrying modern Greeks as culturally "degenerate" or "Orientalized" due to perceived laziness, corruption, and deviation from classical norms, which fueled misohellenism—a counter-movement questioning the ethnic and cultural continuity between ancient and modern populations. In contrast, historical and scientific evidence substantiates significant continuity between ancient and modern Greeks across genetic, linguistic, and cultural dimensions, challenging the philhellenic narrative's selective romanticism. Genetic analyses of ancient DNA from Mycenaean burials (circa 1700–1200 BCE) reveal that modern Greeks derive approximately 70–80% of their ancestry from Bronze Age populations in the Aegean, with minimal dilution from later Slavic or Anatolian migrations, as confirmed by autosomal DNA comparisons showing closer affinity to Mycenaeans than to contemporaneous Minoans. Linguistically, modern Greek evolved continuously from ancient dialects through Koine Greek during the Hellenistic and Byzantine eras, retaining core vocabulary, grammar, and syntax—evident in shared terms like demos (people) and polis (city-state)—with Byzantine scholars preserving classical texts that informed the post-independence revival. Culturally, Orthodox Christianity served as a conduit for classical heritage, integrating pagan philosophical traditions into patristic theology and folk customs, while archaeological continuity in settlement patterns and material culture from antiquity through the Ottoman period underscores demographic persistence in core regions like the Peloponnese and Attica. The tension between romantic idealization and historical continuity highlights philhellenism's role in perpetuating a bifurcated view of Greek , often sidelining the Byzantine "middle " as a cultural rupture to emphasize a direct classical-to-modern link that justified intervention. Critics argue this projection not only bred unrealistic expectations—leading to philhellenes like Blaquière lamenting the "Asiatic" traits in Greek irregulars—but also imposed Western standards that undervalued indigenous resilience, such as the klephtic traditions of resistance that echoed ancient guerrilla tactics without classical pomp. Empirical , however, counters such disillusionment by demonstrating causal links: Ottoman millet system preserved Greek Orthodox identity, limiting assimilation and enabling linguistic evolution, thus affirming continuity over rupture. This debate persists in assessing philhellenism's legacy, where its motivational accelerated in 1830 despite factual mismatches, yet risked cultural by prioritizing aesthetic fantasy over verifiable heritage.

Associations with Orientalism and Cultural Looting

Philhellenism has been associated with , particularly in postcolonial critiques, where it is portrayed as reinforcing Western binaries between a civilized, classical "" embodied by and a despotic "" represented by Ottoman rule over modern . Edward Said's framework in Orientalism (1978) implies that philhellenic admiration detached Greece from its Eastern context, framing as alien oppressors whose removal would restore a purportedly European heritage, thereby justifying intervention as a . This view posits philhellenism as complicit in imperial discourse, with European supporters viewing modern Greeks not as authentic heirs but as degraded remnants needing Western rescue to revive classical purity, a that overlooked Byzantine and Ottoman cultural continuities in . However, such interpretations, while influential in academia, have faced criticism for conflating philhellenic enthusiasm—rooted in Enlightenment —with broader colonial exploitation; philhellenes often emphasized Greek exceptionalism precisely to distinguish them from Oriental stereotypes applied to other Eastern peoples. In Germany, for instance, philhellenism and Orientalism initially overlapped in Romantic scholarship but diverged by the mid-19th century, as classicists prioritized Greek purity over Semitic or Persian influences, marginalizing "Oriental" elements in Hellenic studies to maintain a Eurocentric canon. This selective focus contributed to a cultural narrative where philhellenism served national identity formation, as in Bavarian philhellenes who supported Greek independence while advancing German claims to classical heritage, sometimes at the expense of acknowledging Eastern admixtures in Greek antiquity. The philhellenic fervor also intersected with cultural looting, as European collectors and archaeologists, motivated by neoclassical admiration, acquired Greek antiquities amid the instability of Ottoman rule and the Greek War of Independence (1821–1830). During the war, chaotic sieges and uprisings led to documented plundering of sites like the , where fragments of ancient sculptures were fragmented or removed, with some artifacts ending up in Western collections under the guise of preservation. Philhellenes such as the British historian George Finlay amassed extensive private collections of Greek vases, inscriptions, and bronzes in the 1820s–1830s, often purchasing from local markets fed by wartime excavations or sales, contributing to the depletion of on-site contexts. Similarly, German philhellene Ludwig Ross, who participated in independence efforts, conducted excavations in and exported artifacts like metopes to , exemplifying how philhellenic fieldwork blurred into extractive practices justified as scholarly salvage from "barbarian" threats. This era's "antiquities rush" reflected international competition for cultural prestige, with philhellenic networks facilitating the flow of objects to European museums; for example, British and French diplomats pre-dating the war, influenced by philhellenic ideals, secured permissions from Ottoman authorities for removals like the Marbles (1801–1812), setting precedents for later wartime acquisitions. While proponents argued these actions protected heritage from destruction—citing Ottoman neglect or war damage—critics note the lack of consent from Greek communities and the prioritization of Western display over local retention, fueling ongoing debates. Empirical records indicate that between 1820 and 1830, hundreds of artifacts, including Cycladic figurines and Attic pottery, entered private philhellene collections via opportunistic digs, with minimal reinvestment in Greek institutions until the post-independence Bavarian regency formalized but continued exports.

Impact on Greek Historiography and Identity

Philhellenism significantly shaped modern Greek by promoting the notion of direct cultural and ethnic continuity between ancient Hellas and the revolutionaries of the 1820s, portraying the latter as direct heirs to classical civilization whose liberation would revive antiquity's glory. This narrative, embraced by European sympathizers during the Greek War of Independence, encouraged Greek nationalists to adopt classical nomenclature in administration, , and public life—such as reviving ancient-derived terms for institutions and restoring classical toponyms—thereby forging a Hellenic self-image detached from Ottoman influences and aligned with Western ideals of progress. In , philhellenism initially fostered a selective focus on as the core of Greek , marginalizing the Byzantine and Ottoman eras as periods of interruption or decline rather than integral phases of continuity. Early post-independence works, such as those by Greek scholars in the , idealized ancient models for modern society, constructing a teleological where the War of Independence represented a regeneration of ancient virtues. This approach, influenced by philhellenic , contributed to an initial discontinuity in national , later addressed by historian Konstantinos Paparrigopoulos in his multi-volume History of the Greek Nation (1860–1874), which synthesized Byzantine and medieval elements into a unified ethnic lineage to counter foreign skepticism about modern Greeks' worthiness as ancient descendants. The philhellenic emphasis on ancient primacy reinforced a Eurocentric identity for Greece, positioning it as the foundational cradle of Western civilization and justifying claims to cultural artifacts like the Parthenon Marbles, while embedding national pride in classical achievements over more recent historical complexities. However, this framework has drawn critique for oversimplifying causal historical developments, as philhellenic advocacy often prioritized romantic ideological appeals—such as Homer's epics as prolegomena to independence—over empirical assessment of medieval transformations in Greek society. British philhellene George Finlay's extensive histories, spanning from antiquity to the 19th century, exemplified this by integrating modern events into a classical continuum, influencing subsequent Greek scholarship despite his outsider perspective. Overall, philhellenism's legacy in Greek historiography and identity lies in its role as a catalytic ideology for nation-building, though one that selectively curated historical memory to align with contemporaneous European intellectual currents.

Legacy and Broader Influence

Effects on Western Civilization and Nationalism

Philhellenism reinforced the perception of as the foundational cradle of Western civilization, emphasizing its contributions to , , and in European and American intellectual life. During the , the movement popularized neoclassical styles in , , and literature, drawing directly from Greek models to symbolize Enlightenment ideals of reason and liberty. For instance, philhellenic enthusiasm led to widespread adoption of Greek-inspired educational curricula across Europe, where figures like had earlier advocated for Greek art as the pinnacle of human achievement, influencing institutions from Prussian gymnasia to American colleges. This cultural revival not only preserved classical texts through translations and excavations but also positioned as a moral exemplar, countering perceptions of Ottoman rule as antithetical to civilized progress. In terms of , philhellenism provided a template for linking ancient heritage to modern , inspiring European nationalists to invoke for legitimizing their own ethnic and civic identities. The Greek War of Independence (1821–1830), bolstered by philhellene volunteers and funds, demonstrated nationalism's efficacy against imperial decay, challenging the and emboldening revolts in (1830) and (1830–1831) by framing liberation as a reclamation of historical glory. In Germany, while philhellenism initially clashed with emerging Germanic — as Humboldt's classical humanism sought to transcend medieval traditions— it ultimately infused with Hellenic universalism, evident in the use of Greek motifs in unification symbolism post-1871. Similarly, in the United States, philhellenism aligned ancient Greece with republican virtues, reinforcing narratives that equated American expansion with Periclean . This interplay elevated heritage-based nationalism, though it often idealized a selective, pre-Christian Greek past at the expense of Byzantine continuities.

Contributions to Greek Independence and Modern State-Building

Philhellenes provided direct support during the Greek of (1821–1830) through the arrival of approximately 500 to 1,000 foreign volunteers from and the , who fought alongside Greek revolutionaries against Ottoman forces. These volunteers participated in key engagements, such as the Battle of Peta in 1822, where a philhellene-led suffered heavy losses due to tactical inexperience, highlighting both their commitment and limitations in combat effectiveness. Around 400 philhellenes perished in the conflict, contributing to the war effort despite often disorganized integration with Greek irregular forces. Financial aid from philhellenic organizations proved crucial for sustaining the revolution. The London Greek Committee, formed in 1823, coordinated subscriptions for military supplies and facilitated Greece's first international of £472,000 in February 1824, with approximately £278,000 disbursed to fund arms, ships, and operations amid Ottoman sieges. Prominent individuals like amplified these efforts; arriving in in 1823, he personally donated £4,000 (equivalent to about £332,000 in modern terms) to procure vessels and supplies for the revolutionary cause at . Such contributions helped prevent total collapse during crises like the Egyptian intervention in 1825–1826. Beyond battlefield and fiscal support, philhellenism exerted moral and diplomatic pressure that influenced European powers to intervene decisively. Public campaigns in Britain, , and romanticized the Greek struggle as a rebirth of classical liberty, fostering sympathy that pressured governments despite initial neutrality; this culminated in the on October 20, 1827, where allied fleets destroyed the Ottoman-Egyptian armada, shifting the war's momentum toward Greek victory. The movement's advocacy ensured international recognition of Greek autonomy via the Treaty of Constantinople in 1832, establishing the modern under Bavarian Prince Otto as its first monarch. In after , philhellenes continued aiding institutional development by promoting European-style reforms and providing expertise. Figures like Richard Church, a British philhellene, served as commander of Greek forces post-1827, helping professionalize the military and integrate it into the new state's framework. Philhellenic networks influenced the drafting of Greece's 1844 constitution, emphasizing liberal principles drawn from Western models, while ongoing loans and investments from sympathizers stabilized the economy and facilitated infrastructure projects aligned with Enlightenment ideals of modernization. This external support, though sometimes paternalistic, bridged Greece's transition from revolutionary chaos to a sovereign entity oriented toward .

References

  1. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/philhellenism
  2. https://www.etymonline.com/word/philhellene
  3. https://hellenicamericancc.org/educational-resources/philhellenism-and-the-role-of-the-great-powers-in-the-greek-war-of-independence/
  4. https://academic.oup.com/crj/article/13/4/571/6424247
  5. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/philhellenic-movement
  6. https://www.ccgs.csah.cam.ac.uk/events/greek-dialogues-british-and-other-philhellenes-greek-revolution-during-1820s
  7. https://www.thenationalherald.com/philhellenes-and-heroes-the-key-figures-of-the-greek-war-of-independence/
  8. https://www.bsa.ac.uk/2022/03/10/philhellenism-redux-finlay-rises/
  9. https://blogs.loc.gov/international-collections/2025/03/greek-independence-and-philhellenism-at-the-library-of-congress/
  10. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/philhellene
  11. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/philhellenism_n
  12. https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-4970
  13. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2021/2021.12.20/
  14. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110716023-001/html
  15. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/philhellenism
  16. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/356288
  17. https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.24033/rhm.189/
  18. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Mithradates-I
  19. https://worldhistoryedu.com/mithridates-i-of-parthia-reign-accomplishments/
  20. https://academic.oup.com/book/40496/chapter/347783917
  21. https://greekherald.com.au/news/opinion/the-evolution-of-philhellenism/
  22. https://www.academia.edu/105539884/Parthian_Turan_and_the_Philhellenism_of_the_Arsacids
  23. https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2023/08/12/parthian-turan-and-the-philhellenism-of-the-arsacids/
  24. https://timemaps.com/encyclopedia/parthian-empire/
  25. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4469&context=gc_etds
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4475791
  27. https://greekreporter.com/2025/03/15/roman-emperor-nero-greece/
  28. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/AA8F32DAEA49AEEFCB845F1A719948FC/S0075435800054769a.pdf/world_of_the_panhellenion_i_athens_and_eleusis.pdf
  29. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09518960802005935
  30. https://iep.utm.edu/marcus-aurelius/
  31. https://hellenicfaith.com/julian/
  32. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/hellenism-in-byzantium/B77476C811D5878B52EF88FD88A1CB19
  33. https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=jablonowski_award
  34. https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/4/1/16
  35. https://www.academia.edu/91487179/New_Romans_Greeks_or_Byzantines_Perceptions_of_the_medieval_Roman_Empire_of_the_East_from_within_and_from_afar_across_Afro_Eurasia
  36. https://grbs.library.duke.edu/index.php/grbs/article/download/11101/4231/14065
  37. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/files/54676537/Stouraitis_Byzantine_Romanness.pdf
  38. https://earlymodernhellenism.org/2024/10/01/at-the-dawn-of-early-modern-hellenism-manuel-chrysoloras-and-the-revival-of-greek-studies-in-renaissance-europe/
  39. https://www.neoskosmos.com/en/2011/06/14/dialogue/opinion/philhellenism-how-the-admirers-of-ancient-greece-changed-history/
  40. https://mlpp.pressbooks.pub/encounterswiththeartsartc150/chapter/renaissance-humanism-rediscovering-greece/
  41. https://www.greekcommunity.com.au/news/from-mystras-to-florence-gemistos-plethon-and-the-eastern-influence-on-the-western-renaissance
  42. https://greekreporter.com/2025/09/14/georgios-gemistos-pletho-greek-neoplatonist-philosopher/
  43. https://www.princeton.edu/~hellenic/renaissanceconferenceabstracts.html
  44. https://greekreporter.com/2025/04/04/greatest-byzantine-greek-scholars-renaissance/
  45. https://www.saintsophiadc.org/how-did-the-fall-of-constantinople-change-the-renaissance-in-italy/
  46. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/vatican/humanism.html
  47. https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/47719/what-ideas-from-ancient-greece-influenced-enlightenment-philosophers
  48. https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch8s1.html
  49. http://gyre.umeoce.maine.edu/physicalocean/Tomczak/science%2Bsociety/lectures/illustrations/lecture21/voltaire.html
  50. https://www.walkingwiththephilhellenes.gr/en/johann-joachim-winckelmann
  51. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137293152_2
  52. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history-art/the-enlightenment/content-section-5
  53. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/greek-tradition-in-republican-thought/montesquieus-greek-republics/0A51BDE43ABC98E481500FB45AAC2CC4
  54. https://www.eefshp.org/en/johann-joachim-winckelmann-forefather-of-the-european-philhellenes-who-praised-greek-aesthetics-and-mental-purity/
  55. https://www.thecollector.com/johann-joachim-winckelmann-father-art-history/
  56. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/encyclopaedia_romana/greece/architecture/classicism.html
  57. https://www.riba.org/explore/riba-collections/architectural-styles/neoclassical-movement/
  58. https://architectureofcities.com/neoclassical-architecture
  59. https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/james-athenian-stuart
  60. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=cmc_theses
  61. https://ijcsrr.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/35-27-2022.pdf
  62. https://greekreporter.com/2025/04/19/lord-byron-poet-died-greece/
  63. https://www.thebyronsociety.com/byron-philhellenism-and-revolution/
  64. https://www.greeknewsagenda.gr/philhellenes/
  65. https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/essays/greek-war-for-independence/
  66. https://greekreporter.com/2022/03/24/american-philhellenes-greek-revolution/
  67. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstreams/5e8d6fe8-e63f-4958-9a3a-f70f4985c00c/download
  68. https://www.ime.gr/chronos/12/en/1821_1833/diethni/08.html
  69. https://www.greeknewsagenda.gr/anna-karakatsouli/
  70. https://www.meer.com/en/90190-broken-dreams-philhellenes-in-the-greek-war-of-independence
  71. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/30318/1/646692.pdf
  72. https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0001
  73. https://petercochran.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/writings_from_greece.pdf
  74. https://www.greecehighdefinition.com/blog/2025/4/26/thomas-gordon-the-english-philhellene-who-criticized-the-revolutionaries
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373071646_The_Absolute_Barbarians_as_Victims_Moral_Blame_Historical_Disappointment_and_Orientalist_Double_Standards_in_Rationalizing_the_Tripolitsa_Massacre
  76. https://www.infezmed.it/media/journal/Vol_23_3_2015_16.pdf
  77. https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/
  78. https://nataliavogeikoff.com/2016/09/01/communism-in-and-out-of-fashion-the-american-school-of-classical-studies-at-athens-and-the-cold-war/
  79. https://www.bsa.ac.uk/research-2/britishphilhellenism/
  80. https://www.greece-is.com/british-school-athens-140-years-pioneering-hellenic-research-innovation/
  81. https://greece.chs.harvard.edu/workshops/philhellenism-across-ages
  82. https://greekreporter.com/2021/04/19/philhellenes-modern-era-greece-usa/
  83. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/truman-doctrine
  84. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/context/ny_pubs/article/1093/viewcontent/On_the_Social_Construction_of_Hellenism.pdf
  85. https://blogs.getty.edu/iris/when-an-amphora-is-not-just-an-amphora-greek-antiquities-as-presidential-gifts/
  86. https://www.getty.edu/visit/cal/events/ev_922.html
  87. https://greekherald.com.au/news/opinion/contemporary-global-philhellenism-1945-2002/
  88. https://academic.oup.com/book/3877/chapter/145399660
  89. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9780230523418_4
  90. https://www.messolonghibyronsociety.gr/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/L.Droulia-Philhellenism-Poland-ed.pdf
  91. https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/historicalReview/article/download/3952/3742
  92. https://www.science.org/content/article/greeks-really-do-have-near-mythical-origins-ancient-dna-reveals
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5565772/
  94. https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2020/02/08/are-modern-greeks-descended-from-the-ancient-greeks/
  95. https://yris.yira.org/acheson-prize/an-eternal-recurrence-patterns-of-german-ideological-hegemony-in-modern-greek-history/
  96. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/707696
  97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290560589_Placing_Modern_Greece_The_Dynamics_of_Romantic_Hellenism_1770-1840
  98. https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/32331/1/parallax.pdf
  99. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230523418_4
  100. https://tidskriftenlychnos.se/article/view/20566/18478
  101. https://journals.lub.lu.se/lychnos/article/download/20566/18478
  102. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-intellectual-history/article/philhellenism-and-the-furor-orientalis/89B1973648E86AE3BF7E1F8DF5F86E70
  103. https://www.namuseum.gr/en/temporary_exhibition/these-are-what-we-fought-for-antiquities-and-the-greek-war-of-independence/
  104. https://www.bsa.ac.uk/about-us/museum/
  105. https://research-bulletin.chs.harvard.edu/2012/10/31/university-professor-antiquities-looter/
  106. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/19thcentury-antiquities-rush-and-the-international-competition-for-cultural-status/6EBE81348D5BAA53F3AD0186DED2C15E
  107. https://smarthistory.org/elgin-marbles-debate-rages/
  108. https://masaresi.com/looting-of-greek-art/
  109. http://culturahistorica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/liakos-hellenisms.pdf
  110. https://classics-at.chs.harvard.edu/classics3-constanze-guthenke-the-philhellenic-horizon-homeric-prolegomena-to-the-greek-war-of-independence/
  111. https://www.eefshp.org/en/the-birth-and-evolution-of-philhellenism-a-journey-through-the-collection-of-shp/
  112. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/03/greece-fetes-bicentennial-of-democracy-with-bit-of-harvard-history/
  113. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/display/book/9789004502277/B9789004502277_s007.pdf
  114. https://helenroche.com/work/talks/2013/06/17/philhellenism-and-laconophilia-in-nineteenth-century-germany-some-nationalist-perspectives/
  115. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-clio-women-gender-history-2021-1-page-151?lang=en
  116. https://www.searchculture.gr/aggregator/portal/portraits/persons/the_philhellenes?language=en
  117. https://www.ekathimerini.com/society/251400/greece-s-loans-from-the-united-kingdom-in-1824-25-myths-and-truths/
  118. https://greekherald.com.au/culture/history/lord-byrons-huge-donation-greek-revolution-unearthed-two-centuries-late/
  119. https://jacobin.com/2021/03/greece-fight-for-independence-global-revolutionary-movement
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.