Hubbry Logo
PhotographPhotographMain
Open search
Photograph
Community hub
Photograph
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Photograph
Photograph
Photograph
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

View from the Window at Le Gras (1826 or 1827), by Nicéphore Niépce, the earliest known surviving photograph of a real-world scene, made with a camera obscura. Original (left) and colorized reoriented enhancement (right).
A modern-day photograph of an Icelandic landscape, captured on a personal camera

A photograph (also known as a photo, or more generically referred to as an image or picture) is an image created by light falling on a photosensitive surface, usually photographic film or an electronic image sensor. The process and practice of creating such images is called photography.

Most photographs are now created using a smartphone or camera, which uses a lens to focus the scene's visible wavelengths of light into a reproduction of what the human eye would perceive.

Etymology

[edit]

The word photograph was coined in 1839 by Sir John Herschel and is based on the Greek φῶς (phos), meaning "light," and γραφή (graphê), meaning "drawing, writing," together meaning "drawing with light."[1]

History

[edit]
Main article: History of photography

The first permanent photograph, a contact-exposed copy of an engraving, was made in 1822 using the bitumen-based "heliography" process developed by Nicéphore Niépce. The first photographs of a real-world scene, made using a camera obscura, followed a few years later at Le Gras, France, in 1826, but Niépce's process was not sensitive enough to be practical for that application: a camera exposure lasting for hours or days was required.[2] In 1829, Niépce entered into a partnership with Louis Daguerre, and the two collaborated to work out a similar, but more sensitive, and otherwise improved process.

View from the Window at Le Gras, 1826 by Joseph Nicéphore Niépce

After Niépce's death on the 5th July 1833[3], Daguerre concentrated on silver halide-based alternatives. He exposed a silver-plated copper sheet to iodine vapor, creating a layer of light-sensitive silver iodide; exposed it in the camera for a few minutes; developed the resulting invisible latent image to visibility with mercury fumes; then bathed the plate in a hot salt solution to remove the remaining silver iodide, making the results light-fast. He named this first practical process for making photographs with a camera, the daguerreotype, after himself. Its existence was announced to the world on 7 January 1839, but working details were not made public until 19 August that year. Other inventors soon made drastic improvements that reduced the required amount of exposure time from a few minutes to just a few seconds, making portrait photography truly practical and widely popular during this time.

The daguerreotype had shortcomings, notably the fragility of the mirror-like image surface and the particular viewing conditions required to see the image properly. Each was a unique, opaque positive that could only be duplicated by copying it with a camera. Inventors set about working out improved processes that would be more practical. By the end of the 1850s, the daguerreotype had been replaced by the less expensive and more easily viewed ambrotype and tintype, which made use of the recently introduced collodion process. Glass plate collodion negatives used to make prints on albumen paper soon became the preferred photographic method and held that position for many years, even after the introduction of the more convenient gelatin process in 1871. Refinements of the gelatin process have remained the primary black-and-white photographic process to this day, differing primarily in the sensitivity of the emulsion and the support material used, which was originally glass, then a variety of flexible plastic films, along with various types of paper for the final prints.

The Market Square of Helsinki, in the 1890s

Color photography is almost as old as black-and-white, with early experiments including John Herschel's Anthotype prints in 1842, the pioneering work of Louis Ducos du Hauron in the 1860s, and the Lippmann process unveiled in 1891, but for many years color photography remained little more than a laboratory curiosity. It first became a widespread commercial reality with the introduction of Autochrome plates in 1907, but the plates were very expensive and not suitable for casual snapshot-taking with hand-held cameras. The mid-1930s saw the introduction of Kodachrome and Agfacolor Neu, the first easy-to-use color films of the modern multi-layer chromogenic type. These early processes produced transparencies for use in slide projectors and viewing devices, but color prints became increasingly popular after the introduction of chromogenic color print paper in the 1940s. The needs of the motion picture industry generated a number of special processes and systems, perhaps the best-known being the now-obsolete three-strip Technicolor process.

Types of photographs

[edit]
Long-exposure photograph of the Very Large Telescope[4]

Non-digital photographs are produced with a two-step chemical process. In the two-step process, the light-sensitive film captures a negative image (colors and lights/darks are inverted). To produce a positive image, the negative is most commonly transferred ('printed') onto photographic paper. Printing the negative onto transparent film stock is used to manufacture motion picture films.

Alternatively, the film is processed to invert the negative image, yielding positive transparency. Such positive images are usually mounted in frames, called slides. Before recent advances in digital photography, transparencies were widely used by professionals because of their sharpness and accuracy of color rendition. Most photographs published in magazines were taken on color transparency film.

Originally, all photographs were monochromatic or hand-painted in color. Although methods for developing color photos were available as early as 1861, they did not become widely available until the 1940s or 1950s, and even so, until the 1960s, most photographs were taken in black and white. Since then, color photography has dominated popular photography, although black-and-white is still used, being easier to develop than color.

Panoramic format images can be taken with cameras like the Hasselblad Xpan on standard film. Since the 1990s, panoramic photos have been available on the Advanced Photo System (APS) film. APS was developed by several of the major film manufacturers to provide a film with different formats and computerized options available, though APS panoramas were created using a mask in panorama-capable cameras, far less desirable than a true panoramic camera, which achieves its effect through a wider film format. APS has become less popular and has been discontinued.

The advent of the microcomputer and digital photography has led to the rise of digital prints. These prints are created from stored graphic formats such as JPEG, TIFF, and RAW. The types of printers used include inkjet printers, dye-sublimation printers, laser printers, and thermal printers. Inkjet prints are sometimes given the coined name "Giclée".

The Web has been a popular medium for storing and sharing photos ever since the first photograph was published on the web by Tim Berners-Lee in 1992 (an image of the CERN house band Les Horribles Cernettes). Today, popular sites such as Flickr, PhotoBucket, and 500px are used by millions of people to share their pictures.

The first "selfie", or self-portrait, was taken by Robert Cornelious back in 1839.[5] "Selfies" have become one of the most common photographs, especially among female young adults. Social media has become such a cultural advancement because of photography. People thrive off of the selfies of their favorite celebrities, many receive millions of likes on social media because of one simple selfie.

Preservation

[edit]

Paper folders

[edit]

Ideal photograph storage involves placing each photo in an individual folder constructed from buffered, or acid-free paper.[6] Buffered paper folders are especially recommended in cases when a photograph was previously mounted onto poor quality material or using an adhesive that will lead to even more acid creation.[7] Store photographs measuring 8x10 inches or smaller vertically along the longer edge of the photo in the buffered paper folder, within a larger archival box, and label each folder with relevant information to identify it. The rigid nature of the folder protects the photo from slumping or creasing, as long as the box is not packed too tightly or under filled. Folder larger photos or brittle photos stacked flat within archival boxes with other materials of comparable size.[8]

Polyester enclosures

[edit]

The most stable of plastics used in photo preservation, polyester, does not generate any harmful chemical elements, nor does it have any capability to absorb acids generated by the photograph itself. Polyester sleeves and encapsulation have been praised for their ability to protect the photograph from humidity and environmental pollution, slowing the reaction between the item and the atmosphere. This is true, however the polyester just as frequently traps these elements next to the material it is intended to protect. This is especially risky in a storage environment that experiences drastic fluctuations in humidity or temperature, leading to ferrotyping, or sticking of the photograph to the plastic.[6] Photographs sleeved or encapsulated in polyester cannot be stored vertically in boxes because they will slide down next to each other within the box, bending and folding, nor can the archivist write directly onto the polyester to identify the photograph. Therefore, it is necessary to either stack polyester protected photographs horizontally within a box, or bind them in a three ring binder. Stacking the photos horizontally within a flat box will greatly reduce ease of access, and binders leave three sides of the photo exposed to the effects of light[9] and do not support the photograph evenly on both sides, leading to slumping and bending within the binder. The plastic used for enclosures has been manufactured to be as frictionless as possible to prevent scratching photos during insertion to the sleeves. Unfortunately, the slippery nature of the enclosure generates a build-up of static electricity, which attracts dust and lint particles. The static can attract the dust to the inside of the sleeve, as well, where it can scratch the photograph.[6] Likewise, these components that aid in insertion of the photo, referred to as slip agents, can break down and transfer from the plastic to the photograph, where they deposit as an oily film, attracting further lint and dust. At this time, there is no test to evaluate the long-term effects of these components on photographs. In addition, the plastic sleeves can develop kinks or creases in the surface, which will scratch away at the emulsion during handling.[9]

Handling and care

[edit]

It is best to leave photographs lying flat on the table when viewing them. Do not pick it up from a corner, or even from two sides and hold it at eye level. Every time the photograph bends, even a little, this can break down the emulsion.[10] The very nature of enclosing a photograph in plastic encourages users to pick it up; users tend to handle plastic enclosed photographs less gently than non-enclosed photographs, simply because they feel the plastic enclosure makes the photo impervious to all mishandling. As long as a photo is in its folder, there is no need to touch it; simply remove the folder from the box, lay it flat on the table, and open the folder. If for some reason the researchers or archivists do need to handle the actual photo, perhaps to examine the verso for writing, they can use gloves if there appears to be a risk from oils or dirt on the hands.

Myths and beliefs

[edit]
See also: Aniconism

Because daguerreotypes were rendered on a mirrored surface, many spiritualists also became practitioners of the new art form. Spiritualists would claim that the human image on the mirrored surface was akin to looking into one's soul. The spiritualists also believed that it would open their souls and let demons in. Among some Muslims, it is makruh (disliked) to perform salah (worship) in a place decorated with photographs.[11] Photography and darkroom anomalies and artifacts sometimes lead viewers to believe that spirits or demons have been captured in photos. Some have made a career out of taking pictures of "ghosts" or "spirits".[12] There are many instances where people believe photos will bring bad luck either to the person taking the picture or people captured in the photo. For instance, a photograph taken of a pregnant woman will bring bad luck to the baby in the womb and photos taken of dead people will ensure that person is not successful in the afterlife.[13]

Legality

[edit]
Main article: Photography and the law

The production or distribution of certain types of photograph has been forbidden under modern laws, such as those of government buildings,[14] highly classified regions,[15] private property, copyrighted works,[16][17] children's genitalia,[18] child pornography and less commonly pornography overall.[19] These laws vary greatly between jurisdictions.

In some public property owned by government, such as law courts,[20] government buildings, libraries, civic centres [21][22] and some of the museums in Hong Kong, photography is not allowed without permission from the government. It is illegal to equip or take photographs and recording in a place of public entertainment, such as cinemas and indoor theaters.[23][24] In Hungary, from 15 March 2014 when the long-awaited Civil Code was published, the law re-stated what had been normal practice, namely, that a person had the right to refuse being photographed. However, implied consent exists: it is not illegal to photograph a person who does not actively object.[25][26]

In South Africa photographing people in public is legal.[27] Reproducing and selling photographs of people is legal for editorial and limited fair use commercial purposes. There exists no case law to define what the limits on commercial use are. In the United Kingdom there are no laws forbidding photography of private property from a public place.[28] Persistent and aggressive photography of a single individual may come under the legal definition of harassment.[29][30][31][32] A right to privacy came into existence in UK law as a consequence of the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law through the Human Rights Act 1998. This can result in restrictions on the publication of photography.[33][34]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Photograph

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
![Nicéphore Niépce's oldest surviving photograph, View from the Window at Le Gras (1826 or 1827)]float-right A photograph is a picture produced by a camera that records an image on light-sensitive material, such as or an electronic sensor, through the chemical or electronic action of light. The term derives from Greek roots meaning "drawing with light," reflecting the process's reliance on light to form images. Photography emerged in the early 19th century as inventors sought to fix transient images from the , with producing the first surviving permanent photograph, View from the Window at Le Gras, around 1826 using a bitumen-coated plate exposed for several hours. Subsequent advancements by in 1839 introduced the , a practical process that produced sharp, detailed images on silvered copper plates, marking the public announcement of as a viable technology. Key technological aspects include the camera's lens system for focusing light, exposure controls to manage light intensity and duration, and processing methods to develop latent images into visible prints or digital files. From its origins in chemical emulsions, photography transitioned to digital sensors in the late , enabling instant capture, manipulation, and dissemination, profoundly influencing fields from scientific documentation to artistic expression and .

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

A photograph is an image produced by the chemical or electronic action of , particularly , on a light-sensitive recording medium such as or an electronic . This process captures the intensity and spatial distribution of reflected or emitted from a scene, typically focused through a lens to form a two-dimensional projection on the medium's plane. In analog systems, exposure creates a in silver crystals, which is then developed chemically to produce a visible positive or negative; in digital systems, photons generate electron-hole pairs in pixels, yielding electrical signals converted to for storage and display. The fidelity of a photograph to the original scene derives from the of light propagation and geometric , where the lens inverts and focuses rays to replicate relative brightness and position, though distortions like lens aberrations or atmospheric effects can occur. Unlike hand-drawn representations, photographs mechanically index the light from real objects at a precise instant, enabling documentary accuracy, though manipulations in development, , or digital can introduce alterations. This causal link to physical distinguishes photographs from synthetic computer-generated images, even as hybrid techniques blur boundaries in contemporary practice.

Etymology

The word photograph was coined in 1839 by British astronomer and polymath Sir John Frederick William Herschel, combining the Greek roots phōs (φῶς), meaning "light," and graphē (γραφή), meaning "drawing" or "writing." This etymology encapsulates the process of producing images through the action of light on chemically sensitized surfaces, distinguishing it from earlier terms like heliography used by Joseph Nicéphore Niépce for his pioneering asphalt-based prints. Herschel introduced the term in private correspondence and a January 1839 letter to the Athenaeum magazine, where he described Daguerre's process and proposed standardized nomenclature for the emerging field, including as the general practice, negative for inverted images, and positive for the final prints. The adoption of photograph rapidly supplanted alternatives, reflecting Herschel's influence as an early experimenter with cyanotypes and his advocacy for precise, descriptive terminology rooted in classical languages.

Underlying Principles

Photography fundamentally relies on the capture and fixation of light patterns to form persistent images, grounded in the principles of geometric optics and material responses to electromagnetic radiation. Light, as rays originating from a scene, converges through optical elements such as lenses to form a real or virtual image on a focal plane, adhering to the thin lens equation 1f=1do+1di\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{d_o} + \frac{1}{d_i}, where ff is the focal length, dod_o the object distance, and did_i the image distance. This inversion and scaling of the scene's spatial distribution occur via refraction at curved surfaces, with ray tracing—tracking principal rays parallel to the optical axis, through the focal point, or along the axis—predicting image location, orientation, and magnification. Aberrations like spherical distortion or chromatic dispersion arise from deviations in ideal ray paths, mitigated by lens design. In , image permanence stems from photochemical reactions in light-sensitive emulsions, typically crystals (e.g., AgBr) embedded in . Exposure to initiates formation: a absorbed by a generates an that reduces a silver to neutral silver atom, clustering metallic silver specks at exposed sites after multiple exposures, as the reaction 2AgBr→2Ag+Br22AgBr \rightarrow 2Ag + Br_2 proceeds inefficiently without amplification. Development then amplifies this latent structure using reducing agents like , selectively dissolving unexposed halides while converting exposed silver ions to visible metallic silver grains, yielding densities proportional to incident light intensity. Fixing with removes residual halides, halting further reaction and stabilizing the image against re-exposure. Digital photography, conversely, exploits the in sensors, where photons with energy exceeding the bandgap (e.g., ~1.1 eV for ) eject electrons from valence bands, generating electron-hole pairs whose charge accumulates in photodiodes or pixels. In charge-coupled devices (CCDs), charges transfer via potential wells before readout; in complementary metal-oxide- (CMOS) active-pixel sensors, each pixel includes amplifiers for direct conversion to voltage, enabling higher speeds and lower power. Quantization into digital values occurs via analog-to-digital converters, with bit depth (e.g., 12-14 bits per channel) determining tonal gradations, while filters separate color via spatial sampling. Both paradigms preserve causal fidelity to scene through exposure reciprocity—image density scaling with light intensity times duration—though quantum efficiency and noise (e.g., from Poisson statistics of photons) limit resolution and .

History of Photography

Early Experiments and Invention

Early efforts to capture permanent images using light date back to the late 18th and early 19th centuries, building on the principle known since antiquity. In 1802, Thomas Wedgwood and in produced temporary silhouettes and copies of botanical specimens by exposing silver salts in a camera obscura, but these images faded rapidly due to the instability of the materials. French inventor Joseph Nicéphore Niépce advanced these attempts starting around 1816, initially coating paper or glass with to produce shadowy negative images, such as a view from a window, though they darkened over time in ambient light. By 1822, Niépce developed , a process using dissolved in on plates; the bitumen hardened proportionally to light exposure, allowing the removal of unexposed areas with solvents to reveal a permanent positive image. His first success was a of an engraved portrait of , marking the earliest known permanent photograph. Niépce's breakthrough culminated in 1826 or 1827 with View from the Window at Le Gras, the oldest surviving camera-produced photograph, exposed for about eight hours on a bitumen-coated plate in a at his estate in Saint-Loup-de-Varennes, . Seeking to refine the lengthy exposures and fragility, Niépce partnered with Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre in 1829; after Niépce's death in 1833, Daguerre perfected the process using iodized silver-plated copper exposed to mercury vapor for development, yielding sharp, unique positive images with exposures reduced to minutes. Independently, in 1834, English scientist William Henry Fox Talbot began experiments after struggling to sketch landscapes during travels, using on paper to create "photogenic drawings"—negative images that could be contact-printed as positives. Talbot's process, patented in 1841, introduced the negative-positive system with salted paper, enabling multiple prints from a single negative and laying groundwork for reproducible . The was publicly announced in on January 7, 1839, by François Arago, spurring Talbot's claims and the rapid dissemination of as a practical technology.

19th Century Developments

The , invented by French artist Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre, represented the first commercially viable photographic process when announced to the public on August 19, 1839, as a gift from the French government to the world. This method involved sensitizing a silver-plated copper sheet with iodine vapor to form , exposing it in a for 10 to 20 minutes initially (later reduced to seconds with improvements like bromine sensitization), and developing it over heated mercury vapor to produce a positive image on the plate, which was then fixed with . Each yielded a singular, mirror-like, highly detailed image unsuitable for reproduction, limiting its use primarily to portraiture in studios where subjects posed rigidly under bright light. In parallel, British scientist William Henry Fox Talbot patented the calotype process in February 1841, introducing the first negative-positive system using coated with , which produced a translucent negative from which multiple positive prints could be made on salted . Exposures ranged from one to several minutes, and the process allowed for enlargement and manipulation, fostering artistic experimentation despite the inherent graininess of supports compared to metal or . Talbot's addressed the daguerreotype's limitation of , enabling broader dissemination of images, though its patent restricted commercial adoption in Britain until 1852. The wet collodion process, introduced by Frederick Scott Archer in without patenting, marked a pivotal advance by employing plates coated with (a solution of in and alcohol) sensitized with , yielding negatives of superior sharpness and resolution to paper-based methods. Plates had to be prepared, exposed, and developed while the collodion remained wet—typically within 15 minutes—necessitating portable darkrooms for field work, but exposure times shortened to seconds under sunlight, facilitating outdoor and action . This versatile technique supported direct positives like ambrotypes (underexposed negatives on with a dark backing) and tintypes (on iron sheets), dominating professional practice through the 1860s and enabling mass portrait production during events like the . By the 1870s, the dry plate process supplanted wet collodion, with British physician Richard Leach Maddox describing in 1871 a method of suspending in on , which could be pre-coated and stored dry until exposed and developed later. This eliminated on-site chemistry, reduced exposures to fractions of a second, and spurred industrialization; commercial dry plates became widely available by 1878, and George Eastman's Massachusetts-based company began manufacturing them in 1881, laying groundwork for . The shift to dry plates democratized , extending it beyond elites to amateurs and accelerating its integration into , , and science.

20th Century Advancements

The marked a period of rapid innovation in photography, transitioning from bulky glass plates and large-format cameras to compact, user-friendly systems that expanded accessibility for amateurs and professionals alike. Advancements focused on formats, camera mechanisms, and lighting, enabling faster workflows, greater portability, and enhanced image quality while remaining rooted in chemical-based analog processes. These developments facilitated the rise of , candid , and widespread consumer adoption, with production scaling dramatically—Eastman alone sold millions of cameras by mid-century. A pivotal shift occurred with the adoption of 35mm film for still photography, originally derived from motion picture stock. In , Ernst Leitz introduced the Leica I, the first commercially viable 35mm camera, designed by with a 24x36mm frame size on perforated , a fixed 50mm f/3.5 lens, and rangefinder focusing for discreet shooting. This compact format, weighing under 2 pounds loaded, revolutionized by allowing photographers like to capture spontaneous moments without the encumbrance of larger equipment, spawning a new era of miniature cameras. Color reproduction advanced significantly with the commercialization of multilayer reversal films. launched in 1935 as a 16mm motion picture stock, followed by 35mm still film in , employing three panchromatic layers sensitized to primary colors and processed via controlled for vibrant, stable transparencies with fine and high resolution up to 100 ISO equivalents. Unlike earlier additive processes like Autochrome, which suffered from low speed and granularity, 's subtractive method yielded professional-grade results, influencing fields from advertising to documentation. Instant photography emerged as a self-contained eliminating darkroom needs. In 1948, Edwin Land's released the Model 95 Land Camera, using peel-apart film packs where exposure triggered a diffusion-transfer reversal process, yielding a positive print in about 60 seconds through pod-squeezed reagents separating developed silver halides. Priced at $89.75 with film at $1.60 per pack for 8 shots, it democratized immediate feedback, selling out rapidly and capturing over 10% of the U.S. market by the 1950s despite higher costs per image. Camera designs evolved toward versatility with the single-lens reflex (SLR) mechanism, enabling through-the-lens viewing and focusing. The Ihagee Kine Exakta, introduced in 1936 as the first production 35mm SLR, featured a waist-level finder with a reflex mirror that swung up during exposure, interchangeable lenses, and compatibility with accessories like viewfinders, though its non-focal-plane shutter limited speeds. Popularity surged post-World War II, with models like the 1952 Asahiflex I incorporating eye-level pentaprisms for parallax-free composition, dominating professional use by the 1960s due to precise control over and bellows-free focusing. Artificial lighting transformed low-light and action capture through flash innovations. Flashbulbs, single-use envelopes filled with shredded magnesium or aluminum foil ignited by battery, became standard in the 1930s, offering synchronized bursts up to 1/1000 second without powder's explosion risks. Electronic flash units, pioneered by Harold Edgerton's stroboscopic lamps in the late 1930s at MIT, used capacitor-discharged tubes for repeatable, high-intensity pulses exceeding 10,000 lumens, enabling freeze-frame studies of phenomena like bullets shattering milk drops at 1/1,000,000 second exposures and influencing in science and sports. Film emulsions improved in sensitivity and , with Kodak's Super-XX in 1940 achieving 100 ASA speeds for faster shutters, while lens coatings reduced flare—Zeiss T-coating in 1935 cut reflections by 50%—enhancing contrast in . These cumulative refinements, driven by wartime demands for and imagery, solidified 's role in , though vulnerabilities like supply disruptions highlighted reliance on chemical supply chains.

Digital Revolution and Beyond

The development of digital photography began with the invention of the first in 1975 by , an at , who assembled a using a Fairchild CCD sensor, capturing 0.01-megapixel black-and-white images stored on , with the device weighing about 8 pounds (3.6 kg) and requiring 23 seconds per exposure. Kodak leadership, however, viewed the technology as lacking commercial viability due to its low resolution compared to , delaying widespread adoption despite internal recognition of its potential. Commercial digital cameras emerged in the late 1980s and early 1990s, with Sony's Mavica prototype in 1981 using analog electronic capture on floppy disks, followed by the first consumer-available digital still camera, the DCS-100, released in 1991 at a cost of $20,000–$30,000, featuring a 1.3-megapixel adapted from a body. By the mid-1990s, prices dropped and resolutions improved, with models like the QV-10 in 1995 introducing LCD previews, enabling instant feedback absent in . This shift reduced processing costs and time, as digital files eliminated chemical development, though early adoption was limited by storage constraints and image quality inferior to 35mm . The digital revolution accelerated in the late and early , with digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras like Canon's EOS D30 in 2000 offering 3-megapixel s at under $3,000, surpassing film in sales volume by 2003 as s matched film's and color fidelity. The integration of digital capture into mobile phones began with the Sharp J-SH04 in 2000, the first , and exploded with Apple's in 2007, which combined a 2-megapixel with seamless sharing via cellular networks, democratizing and increasing global image production from millions to trillions annually. This transition disrupted traditional film giants like , which filed for in 2012 after failing to pivot aggressively, while enabling new applications in , , and . Post-2010 advancements shifted toward mirrorless interchangeable-lens cameras, with Sony's Alpha series in 2010 introducing electronic viewfinders and faster , reducing size and weight compared to DSLRs while incorporating higher-resolution sensors exceeding 20 megapixels by 2015. Smartphone advanced through multi-lens arrays and software algorithms, as in Google's series from 2016 using for enhanced low-light performance and depth simulation, effectively rivaling dedicated cameras for casual use. By 2020, full-frame mirrorless models like the offered 45-megapixel sensors with 8K video, while AI-driven features automated exposure and noise reduction, further blurring lines between professional and consumer tools. These developments have prioritized data efficiency and post-capture editing via software like , sustaining photography's growth amid declining standalone camera sales dominated by , which captured over 90% of images by 2025.

Technological Foundations

Optics and Light Capture

In photographic optics, lenses function by refracting light rays through curved glass or other transparent materials, converging divergent rays from objects in a scene to form a real, inverted image on the focal plane. This process relies on the thin lens equation, 1f=1o+1i\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{o} + \frac{1}{i}, where ff is the focal length, oo is the object distance, and ii is the image distance, enabling sharp focus by adjusting the lens-to-sensor distance for varying subject distances. Converging (positive) lenses, typically convex, bend parallel incoming rays to a focal point, with the focal length measured from the lens's optical center to this convergence point for distant objects. The of a lens, expressed in millimeters, determines both the angle of view and the degree of ; shorter focal lengths (e.g., 24 mm) yield wide-angle perspectives with broader fields of view, while longer ones (e.g., 200 mm) produce telephoto effects with narrower views and greater compression of perspective. Light capture efficiency, or the lens's ability to gather photons, scales with the diameter, which is the focal length divided by the (e.g., f/2.8 allows more light than f/8 for the same focal length). , controlled by an iris diaphragm, not only regulates light intensity but also influences (DOF), the axial range over which objects appear acceptably sharp; smaller apertures (higher f-numbers) increase DOF by reducing the circle of confusion for off-focus rays, as the narrower beam minimizes blur from defocus. DOF is further modulated by focal length and subject distance: longer s shallow DOF at equivalent apertures and magnifications due to the steeper ray angles from the subject, while closer subjects reduce DOF by magnifying the defocus blur proportionally. Quantitatively, for a given and framing, DOF approximates DOF≈2Ncu2f2\text{DOF} \approx \frac{2 N c u^2}{f^2}, where NN is the , cc is the circle of confusion diameter (typically 0.02–0.03 mm for full-frame sensors), and uu is subject distance, illustrating the inverse square dependence on focal length ff. Optical aberrations—such as (peripheral rays focusing shorter than axial ones) and (wavelength-dependent causing color fringing)—degrade image quality but are mitigated in modern lenses through aspheric elements, achromatic doublets ( and pairs), and anti-reflective coatings that reduce and ghosting by minimizing surface reflections to below 0.5% per interface. These corrections ensure high-resolution light capture, with diffraction limits setting the theoretical maximum at apertures finer than f/8–f/11, where airy disk size equals the radius r=1.22λNr = 1.22 \lambda N, with λ\lambda as .

Chemical Processes in Analog Photography

Analog photography relies on silver halide emulsions coated on film or paper substrates, typically consisting of gelatin suspending microcrystals of silver bromide (AgBr), silver chloride (AgCl), or mixtures thereof, with AgBr predominant for its balance of sensitivity and stability. These crystals, ranging from 0.1 to several micrometers in size, incorporate sensitivity specks—impurities like sulfur or gold compounds—that enable light sensitivity by serving as electron traps. The emulsion's light sensitivity arises from the photochemical instability of silver halides, where exposure to photons initiates electron excitation without immediate visible change. Upon exposure to in a camera, photons with energy exceeding the bandgap of the (approximately 2.5 eV for AgBr) are absorbed, generating electron-hole pairs within the lattice. Free electrons migrate to sensitivity sites on the surface, where they reduce interstitial silver ions (Ag⁺) to neutral silver atoms (Ag⁰), forming initial specks of 2–4 atoms. Subsequent exposures add more atoms, creating stable centers of 6–10 silver atoms after as few as 4–10 photons per ; these clusters are submicroscopic and invisible but catalytically active for amplification. Unexposed crystals remain unchanged, establishing the image's contrast through differential . This forms selectively on exposed grains, with efficiency influenced by —blue light most effective for AgBr—and exposure duration, typically 1/1000 to several seconds. Development converts the into a visible one by immersing the exposed material in a reducing solution, such as or metol-ascorbic mixtures at 8–11, which selectively reduces silver ions to metallic silver only at sites catalyzed by the latent specks. The reaction proceeds autocatalytically: each new silver atom lowers the for adjacent ions, rapidly growing specks into grains 0.5–1.5 micrometers in diameter, yielding densities up to 10¹² atoms per and forming the negative where denser silver corresponds to brighter scene areas. Development time varies from 3–15 minutes at 20°C, controlled by and agitation to prevent uneven reduction; overdevelopment increases (random silver deposition on unexposed grains), while underdevelopment yields low contrast. Following development, a of dilute acetic acid ( 3–4) neutralizes residual , halting the reaction within seconds to prevent further density buildup or reticulation ( cracking). Fixing then stabilizes the image by dissolving unexposed and partially exposed silver halides using (Na₂S₂O₃, "hypo"), which forms soluble complexes like [Ag(S₂O₃)₂]³⁻ via the reaction AgBr + 2S₂O₃²⁻ → [Ag(S₂O₃)₂]³⁻ + Br⁻. This process, lasting 2–10 minutes with rapid fixers like , renders the material insensitive to light while preserving the metallic silver image; incomplete fixing leaves halides prone to fading under illumination. Thorough removes fixer residues to avoid formation, followed optionally by a hardening bath of to stabilize against humidity. In chromogenic color processes, analogous to black-and-white but using multilayer emulsions with color couplers, development incorporates dye formation: oxidized p-phenylenediamine developers react with couplers to produce , , or dyes proportional to silver in each layer, after which silver is bleached and fixed. This extends the silver halide principle to spectral sensitivity via dye sensitization, achieving panchromatic response since the 1930s. Overall, these and complexation reactions underpin analog photography's archival stability, with properly processed images retaining for centuries under dark storage, though environmental factors like accelerate degradation.

Digital Imaging Technology

Digital imaging technology in photography replaces chemical film with electronic sensors to capture light as . The core component is the , typically a (CCD) or complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor () array, which consists of millions of photosites (pixels) that convert photons into electrical charges. Each photosite contains a that generates electrons proportional to the incident light intensity during exposure, accumulating charge until readout. This process enables instantaneous capture without the need for development, allowing for immediate review and unlimited exposures limited only by storage. CCD sensors transfer accumulated charge serially across the array to a single output via charge shifting, historically providing lower and higher uniformity due to uniform pixel response, though at the cost of higher power consumption and slower readout speeds. In contrast, sensors integrate an and (ADC) at each , enabling parallel readout, reduced power use (often 10-100 times lower than CCDs), and faster frame rates, making them dominant in modern consumer and professional cameras since the early 2000s. advancements, such as backside illumination and designs, have minimized historical drawbacks like read , achieving dynamic ranges exceeding 14 stops and quantum efficiencies over 80% in full-frame sensors. Color information is captured using a color filter array, most commonly the , which overlays a of , , and filters in an RGGB pattern on the sensor, with filters comprising 50% of photosites to match human sensitivity. Monochrome data from each photosite is interpolated via algorithms in the image signal processor (ISP) to reconstruct full RGB values per , introducing potential artifacts like moiré unless mitigated by optical low-pass filters. The raw sensor output undergoes pipeline processing: analog gain adjustment for ISO, correction, defect interpolation, and balance application, before storage. Output formats include RAW files, which preserve unprocessed 12-16 bit per channel data from the ADC for maximum post-capture flexibility in exposure recovery and , and , a lossy 8-bit compressed format applying in-camera tone curves, sharpening, and for smaller files suitable for immediate sharing. Digital sensors offer advantages over analog such as electronic tunable via algorithms and higher speed for burst shooting, but limitations persist in smaller sensors exhibiting limits and thermal noise at high ISOs, though larger formats (e.g., full-frame or medium-format ) rival 's granularity and latitude. resolution, measured in megapixels (e.g., 45-100 MP in professional models as of 2023), balances detail with file size and readout speed, constrained by physics like scaling with count.

Production Methods

Camera Types and Mechanisms

Cameras operate by directing light through an optical system onto a recording medium, with mechanisms controlling focus, exposure duration via the shutter, and light intensity via the aperture diaphragm. The lens, typically composed of multiple glass elements, converges light rays to form a sharp image at the focal plane, where film or a digital sensor captures it chemically or electronically. Shutter mechanisms, such as leaf shutters between lens elements or focal-plane shutters near the sensor, open for precise intervals ranging from seconds to 1/8000th of a second or faster in modern designs. Aperture settings, expressed as f-stops (e.g., f/2.8 to f/22), adjust the iris diaphragm to balance light intake and depth of field. Pinhole cameras represent the simplest mechanism, forgoing lenses entirely in favor of a tiny (typically 0.2-1 mm ) in a -proof , which projects an inverted image via straight-line light propagation onto or ; exposure times often exceed several seconds due to limits and low light gathering, with no adjustable focus or shutter beyond manual covers. View cameras, used in large-format (e.g., 4x5 or 8x10 inch sheets), employ a assembly connecting a lens board to a film back, enabling tilts, shifts, and swings of the standards to correct and plane of focus independently of the lens; focusing occurs on a screen viewed via a dark cloth, with shutters often integrated into the lens barrel. Rangefinder cameras utilize a mechanical or optical coupled to the lens focusing ring, where two windows project overlapping images into the —alignment of a secondary "floating" image with the primary scene indicates sharp focus by triangulating subject distance, typically accurate to within 0.1 meters at close range; this separate optical path introduces error for near subjects, unlike through-the-lens systems. Single-lens reflex (SLR) cameras, whether analog or digital, incorporate a reflex mirror at 45 degrees that directs light from the lens to an optical via a , flipping out of the way during exposure to allow full-frame projection onto or ; this provides parallax-free composition but introduces brief blackout in the viewfinder and mechanical vibration at high speeds. Digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras extend SLR mechanisms with an electronic image sensor (e.g., CMOS or CCD) replacing film, converting photons to electrical charges via photodiodes arranged in a Bayer filter mosaic for color data, processed by onboard image signal processors into RAW or JPEG files; phase-detection autofocus uses dedicated sensors sampling light split from the mirror, enabling rapid tracking up to 14 frames per second in models like the Canon EOS-1D series. Mirrorless cameras eliminate the reflex mirror and optical viewfinder, routing light directly to the sensor for an electronic viewfinder (EVF) or rear LCD to display a real-time preview with exposure simulation; this shorter flange distance allows compact bodies and lens adaptations, with on-sensor hybrid autofocus (phase and contrast detection) achieving speeds comparable to DSLRs, often exceeding 20 frames per second in flagships like Sony's Alpha series, though early models suffered from battery drain due to constant sensor readout. Compact and bridge cameras integrate fixed or zoom lenses with automated mechanisms in smaller bodies, relying on contrast-detection via the and electronic shutters for silent operation; sensors are typically smaller (e.g., 1-inch or equivalents) limiting low-light performance, but computational features like in-body stabilization enhance usability for casual . Medium- and large-format cameras scale up or sizes (e.g., 44x33 mm or larger) for higher resolution and , often modular with interchangeable digital backs on bodies, where mechanisms prioritize image quality over speed, with exposures controlled via shutters supporting apertures as small as f/64 for maximum .
Camera TypeKey MechanismAdvantagesLimitations
DSLR mirror for optical ; phase-detection Precise composition; extensive lens ecosystemBulkier; mirror slap
MirrorlessDirect readout to EVF/LCD; on- Compact; silent shooting; video integrationBattery life; EVF lag in low light
Coupled optical for focusQuiet; compact for Parallax error; limited lens compatibility
View/Bellows movements for plane control; focusPerspective correction; ultimate resolutionSlow workflow; high cost

Exposure Triangle and Composition

The exposure triangle refers to the interdependent relationship among three core camera settings—, , and ISO—that determine the overall exposure of a photograph by controlling the quantity of reaching the or . These settings must be balanced to achieve correct exposure, where the image neither underexposes (too dark) nor overexposes (too bright), typically measured in stops of , with each representing a doubling or halving of light intensity. Adjusting one parameter necessitates compensatory changes in the others to maintain equivalent exposure, as illustrated by the reciprocal nature of f-stops, shutter fractions, and ISO doublings (e.g., opening by one stop allows halving the or ISO for the same brightness). Aperture, denoted by f-numbers (e.g., f/2.8 or f/16), governs the diameter of the lens diaphragm, directly influencing light intake: lower f-numbers permit more light via wider openings but yield shallower (DoF), the range of sharp focus, which blurs backgrounds effectively for portraits. Conversely, higher f-numbers reduce light but increase DoF, ideal for landscapes requiring foreground-to-background sharpness. , expressed in seconds or fractions (e.g., 1/1000 s for fast action or 1 s for low light), dictates exposure duration: faster speeds minimize motion blur from subject or camera movement but demand more light or higher ISO, while slower speeds risk blur unless stabilized (e.g., via ). ISO measures sensor sensitivity to light, with base values like 100 yielding low noise in bright conditions; elevating ISO (e.g., to 3200) amplifies signal for dim scenes but introduces digital noise—grainy artifacts from amplified electronic signals—degrading image quality, particularly in shadows. These elements entail trade-offs beyond mere : prioritizing wide apertures sacrifices DoF control, fast shutters combat blur at the cost of light, and high ISOs trade cleanliness for usability in low light, often necessitating post-processing . Photographers employ metering modes (e.g., evaluative or spot) and histograms to assess exposure in real-time, aiming for middle-gray tones around 18% to avoid clipping highlights or shadows. Composition, distinct from exposure's technical control, involves arranging visual elements within the frame to convey meaning, guide viewer attention, and enhance aesthetic impact, rooted in principles derived from and artistic tradition. The rule of thirds, a foundational guideline, divides the frame into a 3x3 grid via two horizontal and two vertical lines, positioning key subjects or horizons along these lines or their intersections to create dynamic tension rather than centered , which can appear static. Leading lines—natural or artificial paths like roads, fences, or rivers—direct the eye toward the focal point, adding depth and narrative flow; for instance, converging diagonals amplify perspective in architectural shots. Additional techniques include framing, using foreground elements (e.g., arches or branches) to enclose and emphasize the subject; symmetry and patterns, exploiting repetition for harmony or disruption for emphasis; and balance, distributing visual weight to avoid lopsidedness, whether through color, tone, or . Effective composition often breaks rigid rules for creative intent, as over-reliance on grids like thirds can yield formulaic results, prioritizing instead the subject's storytelling and contextual relationships. These principles apply universally across analog and digital formats, influencing viewer engagement by leveraging Gestalt principles of perception, such as proximity and continuity.

Post-Processing and Manipulation

In , post-processing occurred primarily in the during the stage, where photographers adjusted negatives or positives to refine tonal range, contrast, and detail. Techniques such as dodging involved selectively reducing light exposure to specific areas of the , lightening highlights or revealing details in shadows, while burning did the opposite by prolonging exposure to darken midtones or shadows for balanced composition. These methods, dating back to the with the rise of enlargers and processes, allowed manual control over the final print's aesthetic without altering the original negative. Advanced analog manipulations included solarization, achieved by briefly re-exposing a developing print to light, creating a surreal reversal of tones where highlights appear dark and vice versa, often used for artistic effects. Other pre-digital techniques encompassed multiple exposures on a single plate, combination printing from several negatives, via cut-and-paste assembly, retouching with pencils or airbrushes, and hand-coloring. Historical examples include Henry Peach Robinson's 1857 composite "She Never Told Her Love," pieced from five negatives to depict a narrative scene, and Edward Steichen's 1902 "Rodin—The Thinker," which combined exposures for dramatic effect. Film development adjustments like pushing (extending development time for underexposed negatives to boost contrast and grain) or pulling (shortening for overexposed ones to reduce density) further enabled compensation for exposure errors during capture. The digital era transformed post-processing with software tools, beginning experimentally with Kodak's 1975 digital camera prototype but maturing commercially in the . , first released in 1990 for Macintosh systems, introduced layers, masks, and non-destructive editing, revolutionizing adjustments for exposure, , sharpening, and . Subsequent innovations, such as support in devices like the 1992 Fotoman Plus, facilitated widespread digital workflows. Digital manipulation techniques mirror analog ones but with greater precision, including to remove or duplicate elements, content-aware filling to inpaint seamlessly, and from multiple sources. While post-processing enhances fidelity to the captured scene—such as correcting lens distortions or spots—extensive manipulation raises ethical boundaries between artistic liberty and deception. Acceptable practices include amplifying faint details or fixing technical artifacts like to better represent visual reality, provided the core content remains unaltered. Unethical alterations, such as adding or erasing (e.g., historical political purges via airbrushing), misrepresent events when presented as truth, eroding trust in photographic evidence; disclosure of methods is essential for transparency in journalistic or scientific contexts. Professional standards, as in press photography, permit global adjustments but prohibit local changes that fabricate elements, ensuring the image's integrity aligns with its intended purpose.

Types and Applications

Genre-Based Classifications

Portrait photography focuses on capturing the likeness, personality, or essence of individuals or groups, often through posed compositions emphasizing facial expressions, poses, and attire. This genre originated in the late 1830s following the public announcement of the process in 1839, with producing the first known photographic self-portrait that year using the technique, which allowed for detailed, permanent images far more accessible than painted . By the mid-19th century, portrait studios proliferated, making a primary application of early photography due to its reproducibility and lower cost compared to traditional art forms. Landscape photography depicts natural or urban scenery, prioritizing expansive views of terrain, weather, and light to evoke atmosphere or document environments. The genre traces its roots to the earliest surviving photograph, Joseph Nicéphore Niépce's of 1826 or 1827 titled View from the Window at Le Gras, an urban landscape captured via a lengthy exposure on plate. In the , photographers like and advanced the form through large-format views of American wilderness, influencing conservation efforts by visually arguing for land preservation. Documentary photography records real-life events, social conditions, or historical moments to inform or provoke awareness, emphasizing authenticity over artistic embellishment. Emerging in the mid-19th century alongside and wet-plate processes, it gained prominence through efforts like ’s 1908–1912 images of child laborers in U.S. factories and mills, which contributed to labor reforms by exposing exploitative conditions. Earlier precedents include Philip Delamotte’s 1850s documentation of disassembly in , marking photography's shift toward evidentiary use in recording disassembly and reconstruction. Street photography captures candid, unposed moments in public spaces, highlighting everyday human activity, urban dynamics, or serendipitous encounters. Developing in the early with handheld cameras enabling discreet shooting, pioneers like in the 1930s coined the "decisive moment" concept, referring to the precise instant when composition and content align spontaneously. Still life photography arranges inanimate objects—such as food, flowers, or artifacts—under controlled lighting to explore form, texture, and symbolism, often echoing 17th-century Dutch traditions adapted to photographic media. This genre flourished post-1839 with studio setups allowing precise control, serving both artistic expression and commercial cataloging needs. Architectural photography documents buildings, structures, and interiors, employing perspective correction and wide-angle lenses to convey scale, design, and context. It arose in the 1840s with calotypes of Gothic Revival sites by figures like Auguste Le Gray, evolving into a tool for architects and preservationists by the late 19th century. Wildlife photography portrays animals in their habitats, requiring telephoto lenses and patience to capture behavior without disturbance. Gaining traction in the late 19th century with George Shiras III’s 1890s flash photography of nocturnal Michigan wildlife, it advanced conservation narratives, as in the 1909–1910 African expeditions yielding images that supported early wildlife protection laws. Fashion photography illustrates clothing and accessories in stylized narratives, blending artistry with commerce to promote trends. Originating around 1913 with Baron Adolphe de Meyer’s Vogue spreads using soft-focus Pictorialist techniques, it shifted to sharper in the 1920s under ’s influence at Condé Nast publications. Commercial and product photography serves advertising by highlighting goods through precise lighting and composition to emphasize features and appeal. This applied genre expanded in the 1920s with magazine reproduction technologies, enabling detailed catalog images that drove consumer markets. Abstract photography isolates shapes, patterns, colors, or textures detached from recognizable subjects, prioritizing visual elements over literal depiction. Emerging in the 1910s alongside Modernist movements, early examples include ’s 1912–1917 "Vortographs" using kaleidoscopic lenses to fracture reality, challenging photography's indexical fidelity.

Specialized Uses

Forensic photography systematically documents crime scenes, , and injuries to create a permanent visual record admissible in legal proceedings. This practice employs standardized techniques such as overall scene views, medium-range shots of key areas, and images with scales for measurement, ensuring accurate representation without distortion. imaging in forensics reveals alterations in documents, differentiates stains, and identifies materials like textiles, aiding investigations where alone is insufficient. Proper , including alternate light sources, prevents shadows and highlights latent , with digital formats now preferred for metadata tracking and court compatibility over analog film. Medical photography captures patient conditions, surgical procedures, and treatment outcomes for diagnostic, educational, and research purposes, adhering to strict protocols for consistency and privacy. Standardized setups, such as identical lighting, distances, and poses, enable reliable before-and-after comparisons in fields like and , enhancing clinical decision-making and publication quality. Under regulations like HIPAA in the United States, images require consent, secure storage equivalent to medical records, and for non-clinical uses to prevent unauthorized disclosure. Clinical photographs support peer-reviewed studies by providing visual evidence of progression or intervention efficacy, though biases in selection or processing must be minimized through objective protocols. In scientific applications, photography facilitates precise observation of phenomena invisible to the , such as microscopic structures or celestial bodies. , using telescopes as lenses with long-exposure plates or digital sensors, records star positions, brightness variations, and deep-sky objects, enabling photometric analysis for distance measurements and galactic mapping since the 19th century. , the earliest method, employs aircraft or drones to survey landscapes for , , and , revealing crop marks or terrain features not discernible from ground level. High-speed and macro techniques in document rapid events like or , while environmental repeat photography quantifies landscape changes over time, as in monitoring erosion or vegetation shifts in national parks. These methods prioritize accuracy over aesthetics, often integrating spectral filters to capture data beyond visible light for empirical validation.

Preservation and Conservation

Analog Media Preservation

Analog photographic media, including negatives, positives, prints, and plates, are inherently susceptible to chemical and physical degradation due to their organic and unstable compositions, such as emulsions on , , or supports. bases, used until the early , undergo autocatalytic and oxidation, progressing from discoloration and to a sticky, powdery residue, compounded by their high flammability. films, predominant from the onward, suffer from "," an autocatalytic deacetylation releasing acetic acid, evident by a odor, emulsion buckling, and base shrinkage, accelerated by temperatures above 15°C (59°F) and relative humidity exceeding 40%. Silver-based prints face from oxidation, sulfiding (shifting grays to yellow-brown tones), and residual fixer hypersensitivity, while supports can acidify from content or pollutants. Prevention begins with environmental control: ideal storage maintains temperatures at 2–10°C (36–50°F) and relative humidity at 20–30% for and media, with darkness to avert photochemical reactions, using airtight enclosures to isolate acidic off-gassing. Freezing at -20°C (-4°F) halts advanced degradation in affected films, though thawing must be gradual to prevent . Segregate deteriorating items, as acetic acid vapors propagate syndrome across collections, and monitor annually with A-D strips calibrated to detect drops indicating onset. Handling protocols emphasize minimal contact: use gloves to avoid oils and fingerprints, support items fully during transfer, and employ inert sleeves or acid-free enclosures rather than PVC or wood, which emit damaging volatiles. Prints should lie flat in window mats to distribute weight and prevent creasing, avoiding stacking without interleaving. For , specialized fire-resistant vaults are mandatory due to risks above 21°C (70°F). Institutional standards, such as those from the National Archives and NEDCC, advocate creating surrogate digital masters for access while retaining originals in controlled archives, as physical reformatting preserves content without altering the source's chemical instability. Duplication via scanning at resolutions exceeding 4000 dpi captures emulsion details non-destructively, though it cannot replicate tactile or chemical authenticity. Restoration for irreversibly damaged items involves chemical stabilization baths or desalination, but these are case-specific and risk further alteration.

Digital Storage and Degradation

Digital photographs are typically stored as binary files in formats such as for compressed distribution, RAW for unprocessed sensor data, and TIFF for lossless archival purposes, with storage occurring on media including hard disk drives (HDDs), solid-state drives (SSDs), optical discs, or cloud services. Unlike analog prints, the data in digital files does not inherently degrade from age or viewing, as it consists of fixed binary values rather than chemical emulsions subject to or chemical reactions. However, the integrity of these files depends on the reliability of the underlying storage medium and software ecosystem. Degradation in digital storage manifests primarily through failure, logical corruption known as bit rot, and format obsolescence. Bit rot, or data rot, refers to the gradual, silent corruption of bits due to factors such as cosmic ray-induced errors, , or defects in storage cells, leading to undetectable data alterations over time without regular verification. For instance, on HDDs, this can occur via gradual decay, while SSDs experience it through charge leakage in flash cells, exacerbating wear from write cycles. Optical media like CDs and DVDs are particularly susceptible to and oxidation, rendering data unreadable after 5–10 years under suboptimal conditions. Format obsolescence poses a separate , where or outdated formats like early RAW variants from specific camera manufacturers become unreadable as software support wanes, driven by market shifts toward newer standards. This is compounded by dependency on codecs, as seen in legacy formats abandoned by developers, potentially stranding files even on intact media. in formats like can introduce irreversible artifacts during repeated saves, simulating degradation through accumulated quantization errors, though single-use lossy files remain stable if unaltered. Mitigation strategies emphasize redundancy and proactive management, including the 3-2-1 backup rule—three copies of data on two different media types, with one offsite—coupled with periodic integrity checks using checksum algorithms like or SHA-256 to detect bit rot. For long-term preservation, institutions recommend migrating to open, lossless formats such as uncompressed TIFF and storing on stable media in controlled environments (e.g., 65–70°F, low humidity) while planning regular format updates to counter obsolescence. services can reduce hardware risks but introduce dependency on provider policies and potential access fees, underscoring the need for vendor-independent strategies.

Restoration Techniques

Restoration techniques for photographs address deterioration from chemical instability, mechanical damage, and environmental exposure, employing minimal intervention to retain evidentiary . Analog methods focus on physical and chemical stabilization of originals, while digital processes leverage scanning and computational tools for non-destructive repair. Professional conservators prioritize reversibility and documentation, testing interventions on margins or duplicates to avoid irreversible alterations. In analog restoration, surface cleaning employs soft brushes, rubber erasers, or solvent gels to remove dust, mold, and accretions without abrading ; for instance, erasers target particulate matter on gelatin silver prints. Structural repairs mend tears using toned Japanese tissue adhered with wheat starch paste, bridging losses while matching original texture. Chemical interventions include bleach baths with or to reduce silver density in overexposed areas, followed by redevelopment to reinstate image tone, though such processes demand monitoring to prevent emulsion swelling. For color materials like dye-transfer prints, stabilizers mitigate by neutralizing acidic degradation products. Digital restoration commences with flatbed or scanning at 600-1200 DPI to capture fine details, preserving the analog artifact intact. Tools such as Adobe Photoshop's Spot Healing Brush algorithmically sample surrounding pixels to fill scratches and spots, blending seamlessly via texture-aware , while the Clone Stamp manually replicates undamaged regions for larger reconstructions. Frequency-based filters correct blur from emulsion cracks, and models, like those in Stacked Restoration, align and median-average stereo pairs to suppress and artifacts in historical images. These methods enhance contrast and reduce grain but require operator judgment to avoid over-smoothing authentic textures. For specialized formats, restoration involves vapor-phase mercury reamalgamation to consolidate tarnished plates, combined with protective varnishing, as demonstrated in 19th-century case studies. Hybrid approaches scan repaired analogs for archival redundancy, ensuring long-term accessibility without repeated handling of fragile originals. Copyright in photographs arises automatically upon creation for original works fixed in a tangible medium, such as or digital files, granting the photographer exclusive rights to reproduction, distribution, public display, and derivative works under laws like the U.S. Act of 1976. The photographer is presumptively the author and initial owner, as confirmed in the landmark U.S. case Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony (1884), which established photographs as constitutionally protectable original works of authorship due to the creator's intellectual choices in composition, , and pose. This protection requires only minimal creativity, distinguishing photographs from mere mechanical copies. Ownership transfers occur through assignment or licensing via written agreements, but default rules favor the creator; for instance, purchasing a physical print conveys in the object but not the underlying , limiting the buyer to personal use absent explicit transfer. Exceptions include "work made for hire," where an employer owns in photographs created by employees within the scope of employment; for commissioned works by independent contractors, ownership vests in the hiring party only if a written instrument explicitly designates it as such and falls within nine statutorily defined categories, as clarified in Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid (1989). Without such agreements, clients receive usage but not , enabling photographers to license images to multiple parties. Copyright duration for photographs varies by jurisdiction but aligns with international standards under the (1886), which treats photographs as artistic works entitled to protection without formalities in over 180 member states. In the United States, terms extend to the photographer's life plus 70 years, or for works for hire, the earlier of 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation. European Union countries mandate 70 years post mortem auctoris for original photographs, while variations exist elsewhere, such as Japan's 50 years from publication or Mexico's life plus 100 years. Upon expiration, works enter the , allowing unrestricted use, though —inalienable claims to attribution and integrity—persist in some Berne adherents like . Registration with national offices, while optional, enables statutory damages and attorney fees in infringement suits, incentivizing creators to document ownership proactively.

Privacy and Right to Image

In the context of photography, privacy rights protect individuals from intrusive capture or disclosure of images in settings where a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, such as private property or non-public areas, while the right to image—often synonymous with the right of publicity—guards against unauthorized commercial exploitation of a person's likeness, name, or identity. These rights stem from tort law principles aimed at preventing harm from appropriation, intrusion, or false portrayal, distinct from copyright which pertains to the photographer's ownership of the image itself. In jurisdictions without statutory codification, courts balance these against First Amendment protections for expressive or newsworthy uses, recognizing that public visibility does not equate to consent for all reproductions. United States law treats these as state-level matters, with no federal privacy right extending to public photography; individuals in plainly visible public spaces generally forfeit claims of intrusion, allowing photographers to capture and publish for or artistic purposes without permission. However, commercial applications—such as —trigger right of claims in over 30 states, requiring proof of unauthorized use for profit and potential damages including lost licensing fees; for instance, California's § 3344 imposes liability for knowing use of another's likeness in without consent, with remedies up to $750 or actual damages trebled. Model releases are standard practice to mitigate risks, though not always legally mandated for non-commercial sales. A landmark case, Nussenzweig v. diCorcia (2006), affirmed this distinction when a New York dismissed and claims against a selling limited-edition prints of an unwitting subject, ruling the artistic use non-commercial and time-barred after one year under state . In , personality rights offer broader protections, treating an individual's image as an extension of human dignity under frameworks like Article 8 of the , which safeguards private life against arbitrary interference. Countries such as require explicit consent for reproducing identifiable images of non-public figures, even if captured in public, unless overridden by overriding ; violations under Article 9 of the Civil Code can yield injunctions and damages for moral harm. The EU's (2016) further classifies biometric data from facial images as "special category" personal data, mandating consent or legal basis for processing, though exemptions apply for journalistic or artistic expression under Article 85. The , in cases like Von Hannover v. Germany (2004), has upheld restrictions on photos of public figures in non-official contexts, prioritizing privacy over press freedom absent significant , contrasting U.S. deference to newsworthiness. Globally, tensions arise with emerging technologies like facial recognition, where unauthorized database scraping of public photos has prompted laws such as ' (2008), fining violators up to $5,000 per or $15,000 per intentional misuse for collecting scans without notice and . Empirical data from litigation shows higher violation rates in commercial contexts, with U.S. courts awarding median of $100,000–$500,000 in successful suits since 2010, underscoring causal links between unpermitted use and economic harm to . Photographers must thus assess context—public vs. private, editorial vs. exploitative—to navigate these rights, as overreliance on "" assumptions ignores jurisdiction-specific evidentiary thresholds for and harm.

Regulation of Photographic Practices

In jurisdictions following traditions, such as the , photographing subjects visible from public spaces is generally protected as an exercise of free speech, with no reasonable expectation of privacy in plainly observable public areas. Courts have upheld this principle, affirming that individuals cannot demand deletion or prohibit capture of images taken from lawful vantage points, though commercial use may trigger requirements separate from capture itself. Exceptions apply in restricted zones, including federal facilities, military installations, and transportation security areas, where prohibitions under laws like the Aviation and Transportation Security Act prevent imaging that could compromise safety; violations can result in fines up to $10,000 or arrest. European regulations often impose stricter limits tied to privacy frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which treats identifiable images as , requiring consent for processing or publication in many cases, though mere capture in public remains broadly permissible absent harassment. In , the "droit à l'image" mandates authorization for publishing recognizable portraits, with civil penalties for non-compliance, while Germany's personality rights similarly protect against unauthorized depiction if it harms dignity. The allows public photography under but enforces restrictions via the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 against voyeuristic practices, such as upskirting, punishable by up to two years imprisonment since its 2019 amendment. Authoritarian regimes enforce broader prohibitions, often justified by national security; in the , photographing government buildings, airports, or uniformed personnel without permits violates Federal Law No. 15 of 2020, with penalties including deportation or jail time for expatriates. criminalizes virtually all unauthorized photography under its penal code, confining tourist imaging to state-guided tours, while restricts shots of military sites or officials per Resolution 90/2013, with confiscation and fines as enforcement tools. Globally, child protection statutes universally ban exploitative imagery, as defined by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (ratified by 196 states as of 2023), prohibiting production or distribution of materials depicting minors in sexual or abusive contexts, with U.S. federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 imposing mandatory minimum sentences of 15 years for production. Emerging practices like drone photography face aviation-specific oversight; in the U.S., rules since 2016 require registration for devices over 250 grams and prohibit flights over crowds without waivers, with fines exceeding $1,000 for violations. Similar mandates exist in the under EASA regulations, mandating remote pilot certification and no-fly zones near , reflecting concerns over aerial capabilities. These frameworks balance technological innovation against risks of unauthorized intrusion, with enforcement varying by local priorities rather than uniform international standards.

Controversies and Debates

Image Manipulation and Authenticity

Image manipulation refers to the alteration of photographs to misrepresent reality, ranging from minor enhancements to wholesale fabrication, a practice that has challenged the medium's perceived authenticity since its inception. Early techniques emerged in the mid-19th century, shortly after the daguerreotype process, involving manual retouching of glass negatives with pencils or brushes to remove blemishes or add elements, as documented in cases from the 1860s where photographers composited multiple exposures for composite portraits. By the late 1800s, darkroom methods like double printing and masking allowed for more complex alterations, such as combining figures from separate images, often for artistic or propagandistic purposes. The advent of digital tools in the 1990s, particularly released in 1990, exponentially expanded manipulation capabilities, enabling seamless cloning, layering, and pixel-level edits without physical traces. Notable historical instances include the 1860 portrait of , where his head was superimposed onto the body of politician to idealize his appearance, and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin's regime routinely airbrushed political rivals from photographs in to erase their existence from official records. In , the 2003 Reuters incident involving photographer Adnan Hajj, who cloned crowds and smoke in Lebanon War images using digital duplication, resulted in the dismissal of 920 archived photos and highlighted how such alterations can fabricate conflict intensity. Authenticity concerns intensified with digital proliferation, as unaltered photographs were once trusted as due to the chemical of negatives, but software democratized , eroding public confidence in visual documentation. Professional codes, such as those from the National Press Photographers Association, prohibit material alterations that change the event's meaning, distinguishing permissible cropping or from unethical . Yet, subtle manipulations—like selective dodging in analog printing or adjustments digitally—blur lines, prompting debates on whether enhancements preserve or distort causal reality in captured scenes. In scientific and evidentiary contexts, such practices have led to retractions; for instance, manipulated gel images in biomedical papers have invalidated findings when inconsistencies in noise patterns were detected. Detection methods rely on forensic analysis of inconsistencies invisible to the eye, including (ELA), which reveals compression discrepancies in edited regions by resaving images at uniform quality levels, and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on tampering traces like residuals or splicing artifacts. Peer-reviewed approaches integrating ELA with CNNs achieve detection accuracies exceeding 90% on benchmark datasets of spliced and copied-forged images, outperforming traditional methods by identifying multi-trace manipulations. Active techniques, such as embedding digital watermarks or provenance logs during capture, provide verifiable chains of custody, though adoption remains limited outside specialized fields like . Despite advances, no method is infallible against sophisticated edits, underscoring the need for contextual verification, such as cross-referencing with raw files or eyewitness accounts, to restore authenticity in an era where manipulation can serve ideological narratives without overt evidence.

AI-Generated Images and Future Implications

Generative adversarial networks (GANs), introduced in 2014, laid the groundwork for AI systems capable of producing photorealistic images by pitting two neural networks against each other to refine outputs. Subsequent models like OpenAI's , released in January 2021, and Stability AI's , made publicly available in August 2022, enabled text-to-image generation that closely mimics traditional photographs, often indistinguishable to human observers. These advancements have blurred the boundary between captured reality and synthetic fabrication, challenging photography's historical role as a reliable record of events. In photography, AI-generated images erode public trust in visual evidence, as studies show individuals struggle to differentiate AI outputs from authentic photographs, leading to diminished assessments of credibility for both. This skepticism extends to photojournalism and legal contexts, where claims of AI alteration are increasingly used to contest image authenticity, potentially complicating evidentiary standards in courts. While AI democratizes image creation—allowing non-experts to produce high-fidelity visuals—it risks amplifying misinformation, as photorealistic deepfakes can fabricate scenarios with minimal resources, fostering widespread doubt in unaltered photographs. Future implications include a hybrid evolution of photography, where AI tools integrate into workflows for editing, upscaling, and conceptual prototyping, yet preserve human elements like on-site capture for emotional depth. Legal battles over training data underscore tensions: in August 2024, a U.S. federal judge advanced copyright infringement claims by artists against Stability AI and Midjourney, alleging unauthorized use of billions of copyrighted images to train models, which could reshape ownership norms and require explicit licensing for datasets. Verification technologies, such as blockchain provenance or embedded metadata, may emerge as standards to authenticate originals, but widespread adoption remains uncertain amid ongoing debates over AI's role in artistic originality versus mechanical replication.

Ethical Dilemmas in Photojournalism

Photojournalists frequently encounter dilemmas arising from the tension between documenting reality authentically and the pressures to produce visually compelling or newsworthy images. Core ethical principles, as codified by the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA), emphasize accuracy, truthfulness, and respect for subjects, including resisting manipulation by staged opportunities and minimizing harm while striving for complete representation. These guidelines underscore that visual must prioritize factual depiction over enhancement, yet enforcement relies on professional self-regulation amid advancing technology and competitive news cycles. One prominent dilemma involves image manipulation, where even minor digital alterations can undermine credibility. In 2003, photographer Brian Walski combined elements from two separate photographs of U.S. Marines in to create a more dramatic composite, leading to his dismissal after the fabrication was detected. Similarly, freelancer Adnan Hajj faced termination in 2006 for digitally elements like and missiles in Lebanon War images, prompting the agency to review thousands of his submissions and issue retractions. Such cases illustrate how post-capture editing, while technically feasible with software like Photoshop, violates the NPPA's mandate against misleading audiences, as alterations distort causal events and erode public trust in unaltered evidence. Another ethical conflict emerges in crisis situations, pitting detached observation against human intervention. Photojournalists must decide whether to prioritize capturing events over aiding victims, as intervening could alter the scene's authenticity. For instance, during the bombing, John Tlumacki photographed victims in distress but refrained from immediate assistance to maintain , later reflecting on the internal struggle between professional duty and moral impulse. In war zones, codes advise against staging or influencing events, yet questions persist about photographing suffering without providing aid, as seen in debates over Robert Capa's 1936 "Falling Soldier" image, alleged by some to be posed despite lacking definitive proof of staging. Privacy and consent pose further challenges, particularly when vulnerable subjects cannot grant permission. Ethical standards require weighing against individual , avoiding exploitation of trauma. The 2012 New York Post publication of photos showing two-year-old Davion Richard struck by a elicited backlash for prioritizing graphic impact over sensitivity, with critics arguing it sensationalized private agony without advancing substantive understanding. NPPA principles advocate treating subjects as ends in themselves, not means, yet in fast-paced environments like refugee crises or disasters, obtaining is often impractical, forcing photojournalists to rely on post-hoc judgment of newsworthiness. These dilemmas are compounded by institutional pressures, including editorial demands for "iconic" images that may incentivize boundary-pushing. While organizations like the contest have disqualified entries for ethical lapses, such as excessive , the subjective nature of "manipulation" thresholds—e.g., cropping versus —continues to spark debate, highlighting the need for rigorous, evidence-based adjudication over subjective narratives. Ultimately, adherence to first-principles of verifiability ensures serves as a reliable record rather than a constructed artifact.

Myths, Misconceptions, and Debunking

Common Technical Fallacies

One prevalent technical in photography asserts that a higher megapixel count inherently yields superior image quality. In reality, while megapixels determine resolution for cropping or enlargement, factors such as sensor size, , performance, and often play larger roles; densely packed small pixels on high-megapixel sensors can increase read and reduce low-light capability compared to lower-resolution sensors with larger photosites. Another misconception holds that ISO settings directly alter the sensor's light sensitivity, akin to variations. ISO amplification in digital cameras instead boosts the signal post-capture, which can introduce without changing the sensor's inherent quantum efficiency or light-gathering physics; underexposed images pushed via high ISO yield poorer results than properly exposed ones at base ISO due to amplified quantization errors. Photographers often err in believing that the lowest possible ISO always produces optimal results, prioritizing it over exposure accuracy. Base ISO minimizes amplification noise, but in low-light scenarios, a higher ISO enabling faster shutter speeds or wider apertures can preserve detail and reduce motion blur or , outperforming a noisier underexposed base-ISO shot corrected in post-processing. A related fallacy claims shallow depth of field (achieved via wide apertures) universally enhances photographic professionalism or aesthetic appeal. Depth of field serves compositional intent; deep focus suits landscapes or macro work where foreground-to-background sharpness conveys scale, while shallow focus isolates subjects in portraits—overreliance on ignores optical trade-offs like aberrations at maximum apertures and fails to account for scene demands. The notion that all lens samples of a given model perform identically overlooks manufacturing tolerances and sample variation in and . Lens elements' alignment, uniformity, and mount precision vary; tests show decentering or in up to 10-20% of copies for certain primes, affecting corner sharpness or flare resistance, necessitating individual or returns for critical work. Digital zoom is frequently misconstrued as equivalent to optical zoom in preserving quality. Digital zoom crops and interpolates the sensor image, discarding data and introducing artifacts like softness or moiré, whereas optical zoom maintains resolution by physically adjusting ; equivalence holds only in marketing claims, not pixel-level fidelity. Equivalence in f-stops across formats is another pitfall, with some asserting identical f/2 apertures gather the same total regardless of . Full-frame f/2 admits more photons per pixel due to larger sensors, yielding better signal-to-noise ratios for the same ; smaller sensors require wider apertures (e.g., f/1.4 on ) for equivalent noise performance, as area scales with format size squared.

Pseudoscientific Claims

Spirit photography emerged in the mid-19th century amid rising interest in spiritualism, with practitioners like William Mumler claiming to capture apparitions of the deceased appearing alongside living subjects in photographs, purportedly as proof of an or spirit communication. Mumler's images, produced starting in 1861, often featured faint figures identified by sitters as lost loved ones, fueling public fascination during the U.S. Civil War era when grief was widespread. However, investigations revealed these effects resulted from photographic fraud techniques, including double exposures and pre-prepared plates with hidden portraits. Mumler faced trial for fraud in in 1869, where expert witnesses demonstrated how such manipulations could replicate the "spirit" images, though he was acquitted due to insufficient proof of intent to defraud specific clients. Subsequent spirit photographers, such as William Hope in early 20th-century Britain, continued similar claims, asserting ectoplasmic manifestations or spirit forms on film. Hope's work was exposed as trickery in 1922 by investigator , who used marked photographic plates to show substitutions and double exposures during séances. Scientific scrutiny, including analyses by physicists and chemists, confirmed no supernatural agency, attributing results to mundane deceptions or chemical anomalies like overexposed negatives. By the 1920s, widespread debunkings by skeptics including diminished the practice, as controlled tests failed to produce verifiable spirit images without operator intervention. Kirlian photography, invented in 1939 by Soviet engineer and his wife Valentina, involves placing objects on photographic exposed to high-voltage, low-current electricity, yielding luminous halo-like patterns claimed to represent biological auras, vital energy fields, or health diagnostics. Proponents asserted these "coronas" reflected emotional states, disease presence, or even a "life force" departing after death, as in the unverified "phantom leaf effect" where patterns allegedly persisted post-decay. Peer-reviewed examinations, however, identify the glow as —a known electrical where ionized air emits light due to voltage gradients, modulated by surface moisture, humidity, barometric pressure, and conductivity rather than any biofield. Replications using non-living objects like coins produce comparable discharges, and variations in living subjects correlate with physical contact and environmental factors, not vitality or , debunking diagnostic claims tested in controlled studies since the 1970s. Thoughtography, or psychic projection of mental images onto unexposed film, gained attention through bellhop in the 1960s, who produced over 200 Polaroid images of buildings, landscapes, and objects by staring into a tube while focusing on "ideons" from his mind. Jule Eisenbud documented sessions in his 1967 book The World of Ted Serios, arguing against fraud after observing under varying controls, yet independent replications failed, and critics noted opportunities for sleight-of-hand, such as tube manipulations or pre-loaded film. No physical mechanism explains the process, and subsequent parapsychological reviews found results non-reproducible in blinded, rigorous protocols, aligning with historical frauds rather than empirical anomaly. Mainstream science dismisses it as unverified , with images often traceable to Serios's known interests or generic scenes.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/photograph
  2. https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/photograph
  3. https://www.moma.org/collection/terms/photography
  4. https://www.napoleon.org/en/young-historians/napodoc/the-birth-of-photography/
  5. https://photographpreservationprogram.hsites.harvard.edu/harvards-history-photography-timeline-text-only
  6. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/when-was-photography-invented/
  7. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/daguerre-1787-1851-and-the-invention-of-photography
  8. https://unitednationsofphotography.com/2023/12/25/what-are-the-most-important-technical-aspects-of-photography/
  9. https://photographylife.com/elements-of-photography
  10. https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2021/12/01/the-impact-of-technology-on-photography
  11. https://blog.pixifi.com/photography-in-the-digital-age-balancing-technology-and-tradition
  12. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/photography
  13. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/what-is-photography-definition/
  14. https://www.acs.org/education/celebrating-chemistry-editions/2024-ncw/developing-photographs.html
  15. https://imma.ie/what-is-art/series-3-materials-methodologies/photography/
  16. https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/teaching/photo_tn_whatis.pdf
  17. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/visual-arts/photography-science
  18. https://www.etymonline.com/word/photograph
  19. https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/person/103KHK
  20. https://www.thehindu.com/children/the-man-who-gave-us-photographs/article68561688.ece
  21. https://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/makingsciencepublic/2024/02/16/john-herschel-a-snapshot-of-his-adventures-in-photography/
  22. https://www.britannica.com/technology/photography
  23. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-physics/chapter/25-6-image-formation-by-lenses/
  24. https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/University_Physics_%28OpenStax%29/University_Physics_III_-_Optics_and_Modern_Physics_%28OpenStax%29/02%253A_Geometric_Optics_and_Image_Formation
  25. https://www.rp-photonics.com/imaging_with_a_lens.html
  26. https://chemart.rice.edu/Photography.html
  27. https://scientificimaging.com/knowledge-base/photoelectric-effect/
  28. https://www.vision-doctor.com/en/camera/cmos-sensors.html
  29. https://www.lifepixel.com/infrared-photography-primer/ch2-basic-theory-how-photography-film-records-light
  30. https://bicentennial-of-photography.org/niepce-and-the-invention-of-photography-niepce-s-first-experiments/
  31. https://www.hrc.utexas.edu/niepce-heliograph/
  32. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/william-henry-fox-talbot-1800-1877-and-the-invention-of-photography
  33. https://smarthistory.org/early-photography-niepce-talbot-and-muybridge/
  34. https://www.loc.gov/collections/daguerreotypes/articles-and-essays/timeline-of-the-daguerreotype-era/
  35. https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/fox-talbot-and-the-calotype
  36. https://smarthistory.org/the-collodion-5-of-12/
  37. https://www.nms.ac.uk/discover-catalogue/inventors-of-photography-exploring-victorian-photographic-techniques
  38. https://www.nfsa.gov.au/preservation/preservation-glossary/dry-plate-photographic-process
  39. https://www.eastman.org/blog/dry-plates-woods-using-19th-century-photographic-processes-capture-letchworth-state-park
  40. https://petapixel.com/oskar-barnack-father-of-35mm-photography/
  41. https://lenshunters.com/history/35mm-photography-leica-contax
  42. https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/history-colour-photography
  43. https://filmcolors.org/timeline-entry/1277/
  44. https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/land-instant-photography.html
  45. https://www.photoion.co.uk/blog/encyclopaedia/brief-history-instant-photography/
  46. https://lenshunters.com/history/35mm-slr-part-1-kine-exakta
  47. https://fiveable.me/history-of-photography/unit-3/single-lens-reflex-cameras/study-guide/KqJdWdXcSzqll9VH
  48. https://petapixel.com/2015/10/05/a-brief-history-of-the-camera-flash-from-explosive-powder-to-led-lights/
  49. https://nga.gov.au/exhibitions/in-a-flash/
  50. https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/history-of-digital-cameras-from-70s-prototypes-to-iphone-and-galaxys-everyday-wonders/
  51. https://www.capture.com/blogs/photo/first-digital-camera
  52. https://www.dijifi.com/blog/a-brief-timeline-of-digital-cameras-from-the-70s-to-today
  53. https://www.wexphotovideo.com/blog/news-articles/social-commentary/the-history-and-evolution-of-digital-camera-photography/
  54. https://www.skillshare.com/en/blog/a-brief-history-of-digital-photography/
  55. https://www.harmann.com/blog-post/the-evolution-of-photography-from-film-to-digital
  56. https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/news/how-has-camera-technology-changed-in-the-last-two-decades
  57. https://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/thinlens.html
  58. https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/Physics_%28Boundless%29/24%253A_Geometric_Optics/24.3%253A_Lenses
  59. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/basic-photography-101-understanding-camera-lenses
  60. https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/imaging/depth-of-field-and-depth-of-focus/
  61. https://photographylife.com/what-is-depth-of-field
  62. https://www.exposureguide.com/focusing-basics/
  63. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/ebooks/PM/Optics-in-Photography/eISBN-9780819479013/10.1117/3.43160
  64. https://pages.hmc.edu/beckman/artclasses/chemistry.htm
  65. https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article-pdf/42/9/36/8301695/36_1_online.pdf
  66. https://www.cfmot.de/en/chemistry-in-analogue-photography/
  67. https://www.opsweb.org/?page=processingchemsitry
  68. https://www.canon-europe.com/pro/infobank/image-sensors-explained/
  69. https://www.tel.com/museum/exhibition/principle/cmos.html
  70. https://asuonline.asu.edu/newsroom/online-learning-tips/digital-vs-film-photography/
  71. https://www.csensor.com/ccd-vs-cmos
  72. https://www.wevolver.com/article/ccd-vs-cmos-image-sensors
  73. https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/imaging/understanding-camera-sensors-for-machine-vision-applications/
  74. https://www.fujifilm-x.com/en-us/series/fundamentals-of-photography/camera-sensors-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work/
  75. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/CCD.pdf
  76. https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/discover/raw-vs-jpeg.html
  77. https://electronics.howstuffworks.com/camera.htm
  78. https://www.adorama.com/alc/parts-of-a-camera/
  79. https://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question131.htm
  80. https://www.largeformatphotography.info/how-to-operate.html
  81. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/buying-guide/a-primer-on-rangefinder-cameras
  82. https://amateurphotographer.com/technique/improve-your-photography/beginners-guide-to-different-camera-types/
  83. https://www.adorama.com/alc/what-are-the-different-types-of-cameras-used-for-photography/
  84. https://photographylife.com/what-is-exposure-triangle
  85. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/understanding-exposure-part-1-the-exposure-triangle
  86. https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2022/09/19/capturing-light-power-exposure-triangle
  87. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/what-is-the-exposure-triangle-explained/
  88. https://visualeducation.com/understanding-the-exposure-triangle/
  89. https://progradedigital.com/understanding-the-exposure-triangle/
  90. https://www.popphoto.com/how-to/fundamentals-of-photography-composition/
  91. https://digital-photography-school.com/rule-of-thirds/
  92. https://visualeducation.com/leading-lines/
  93. https://proedu.com/blogs/photography-fundamentals/darkroom-techniques-the-art-of-traditional-photography
  94. https://www.metmuseum.org/met-publications/faking-it-manipulated-photography-before-photoshop
  95. https://thedarkroom.com/pushing-and-pulling-film/
  96. https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/digital-photo-manipulation-history
  97. https://www.computerhistory.org/makesoftware/exhibit/photoshop/
  98. https://www.astropix.com/html/processing/ethics.html
  99. https://www.unitedstatespressagency.com/news/the-ethics-of-photo-manipulation-what-is-acceptable-in-modern-press-photography/
  100. https://jaysoriano.com/a-brief-history-of-portrait-photography/
  101. https://www.photoconsortium.net/all-our-yesterdays/the-art-of-portrait/
  102. https://www.lightstalking.com/history-landscape-photography/
  103. https://www.lifepixel.com/photo-tutorials/a-brief-history-of-the-start-of-landscape-photography
  104. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/early-documentary-photography
  105. https://www.nationalgalleries.org/art-and-artists/glossary-terms/documentary-photography
  106. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/types-of-photography/
  107. https://www.adorama.com/alc/types-of-photography/
  108. https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/type.html
  109. https://petapixel.com/types-of-photography-photo-genres-you-should-know/
  110. https://www.iphotography.com/blog/the-history-of-photography-movements/
  111. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/fundamental-principles-and-theory-crime-scene-photography
  112. https://www.britannica.com/technology/technology-of-photography/Special-techniques-and-applied-photography
  113. https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/photo/Photography.pdf
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9345030/
  115. https://www.hipaajournal.com/hipaa-photography-rules/
  116. https://www.medicaljournals.se/forum/articles/10/1/24-30.pdf
  117. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/application-of-photography-to-astro/
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/aerial-photography
  119. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/aps-20-1-6.htm
  120. https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2022/03/29/how-photography-has-advanced-the-natural-sciences
  121. https://www.loc.gov/collections/genthe/articles-and-essays/deterioration-and-preservation-of-negatives-autochromes-and-lantern-slides/negatives/
  122. https://www.filmpreservation.org/preservation-basics/vinegar-syndrome
  123. https://www.nfsa.gov.au/preservation/preservation-glossary/vinegar-syndrome
  124. https://psap.library.illinois.edu/collection-id-guide/photoprint
  125. https://archivesandspecialcollections.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/forms-of-photograph-degradation-sulfiding-and-insufficent-fixing/
  126. https://www.canada.ca/en/conservation-institute/services/preventive-conservation/guidelines-collections/photographic-materials.html
  127. https://www.loc.gov/preservation/care/film.html
  128. https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2020/06/19/film-preservation-101-why-does-this-film-smell-like-vinegar/
  129. https://s3.cad.rit.edu/ipi-assets/publications/acetate_guide.pdf
  130. https://www.conservation-wiki.com/wiki/Vinegar_syndrome
  131. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/a-guide-to-archiving-and-storing-film-and-prints
  132. https://www.archivalmethods.com/blog/archivally-storing-negatives/
  133. https://www.archives.gov/preservation/holdings-maintenance/photographs
  134. https://www.nedcc.org/free-resources/preservation-leaflets/5.-photographs/5.1-a-short-guide-to-film-base-photographic-materials-identification%2C-care%2C-and-duplication
  135. https://www.nedcc.org/preservation101/session-7/7reformatting-media-collections
  136. https://www.archives.gov/files/preservation/presentations/besser-18th-conference.pdf
  137. https://www.oppinstitutions.org/how-to-preserve-your-analog-photos-in-digital-format/
  138. https://www.nedcc.org/preservation101/session-5/5film-supports
  139. https://www.gallerysystems.com/best-practices-for-dam-from-digital-imaging-to-file-types/
  140. https://siarchives.si.edu/what-we-do/digital-curation/recommended-preservation-formats-electronic-records
  141. https://www.better-digital-photo-tips.com/do-digital-photos-degrade-over-time.html
  142. https://koofr.eu/blog/posts/dont-let-bit-rot-decay-your-data-understanding-and-preventing-data-corruption
  143. https://www.datacore.com/glossary/bit-rot/
  144. https://www.connectwise.com/blog/what-is-data-rot
  145. https://www.dpconline.org/handbook/technical-solutions-and-tools/file-formats-and-standards
  146. https://www.dpworkshop.org/dpm-eng/oldmedia/obsolescence1.html
  147. https://www.dpconline.org/events/past-events/reformat-what-is-file-format-obsolescence-and-does-it-really-exist
  148. https://vocal.media/art/what-does-image-degradation-mean-causes-and-methods-of-image-quality-deterioration
  149. https://digital-photography-school.com/avoid-loss-digital-photos/
  150. https://www.capture.com/blogs/insights/photo-preservation
  151. https://www.archives.gov/preservation/family-archives/digitizing
  152. https://www.nedcc.org/photograph-conservation-at-nedcc/resources
  153. https://www.getty.edu/publications/resources/virtuallibrary/9780892367016.pdf
  154. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2020/bac-lac/SA2-191-1989-eng.pdf
  155. https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/retouching-repairing-images.html
  156. https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/digital-photo-restoration.htm
  157. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8321351/
  158. https://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/brown/DagPage/Dag.html
  159. https://www.copyright.gov/what-is-copyright/
  160. https://www.copyright.gov/engage/photographers/
  161. https://guides.libraries.indiana.edu/c.php?g=158548&p=1662844
  162. https://www.ffpp.org/copyright-law-basics-photography-united-states-perspective/
  163. https://www.format.com/magazine/resources/photography/photography-copyright-law-guide
  164. https://www.outsidegc.com/blog/common-misconceptions-about-the-work-for-hire-doctrine
  165. https://photocopyrightlaw.com/who-owns-the-copyright-to-a-work-made-for-hire/
  166. https://copyrightalliance.org/education/industry/photographers/
  167. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/283698
  168. https://www.fairlicensing.com/en/blog/photography_copyright_laws_across_the_world_the_main_differences
  169. https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/copyright-blog/copyright-protection-of-photographs-a-comparative-analysis-between-france-germany-and-italy/
  170. https://www.scoredetect.com/blog/posts/copyright-term-limits-comparing-durations-by-country
  171. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/copyright/615/wipo_pub_615.pdf
  172. https://www.caesar.law/practices/right-to-privacy-right-of-publicity/
  173. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/publicity
  174. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/right-of-publicity/
  175. https://www.aclusocal.org/en/photographers-rights
  176. https://parsonsbehle.com/insights/right-of-publicity-and-privacy-laws-key-insights-for-marketing-professionals
  177. https://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/court-cases-involving-photographers/
  178. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/fs_own_image_eng
  179. https://www.copyright.eu/docs/protection-of-a-photo-or-image/
  180. https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/eu-image-rights-when-the-product-us
  181. https://www.taulersmith.com/right-of-publicity-and-invasion-of-privacy-claims/
  182. https://www.inta.org/topics/right-of-publicity/
  183. https://www.legalshield.com/blog/photographic-privacy-can-you-take-picture
  184. https://www.acludc.org/know-your-rights/if-stopped-photographing-public/
  185. https://mnchrm.co/is-street-photography-legal/
  186. https://www.clippingpathcampus.com/public-photography-laws/
  187. https://www.dostreetphotography.com/blog/law-and-ethics
  188. https://loio.com/guides/business/entertainment-law/8-photography-laws-every-photographer-must-know/
  189. https://www.corporatetravelsafety.com/safety-tips/photography-forbidden-foreign-countries/
  190. https://www.bobbooks.co.uk/blog/10-places-around-the-world-where-photography-is-banned
  191. https://faculty.cc.gatech.edu/~beki/cs4001/history.pdf
  192. https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/history-photo-manipulation-1850-1950/
  193. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/political-photo-manipulation-in-history
  194. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5852055/
  195. https://peerj.com/articles/cs-2205/
  196. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/2/881
  197. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373016517_A_Forensic_Methodology_for_Detecting_Image_Manipulations
  198. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12295870/
  199. https://natlawreview.com/article/artificial-doubt-predictive-challenges-image-evidence-age-ai-and-legacy-digital
  200. https://jsk.stanford.edu/news/seeing-no-longer-believing-artificial-intelligences-impact-photojournalism
  201. https://fstoppers.com/artificial-intelligence/ais-impact-photography-and-how-adapt-693642
  202. https://greatbigphotographyworld.com/will-ai-replace-photographers/
  203. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/artists-score-major-win-copyright-case-against-ai-art-generators-1235973601/
  204. https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/andersen-v-stability-ai-the-landmark-case-unpacking-the-copyright-risks-of-ai-image-generators/
  205. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/26/opinion/ai-future-photography.html
  206. https://nppa.org/resources/code-ethics
  207. https://nppa.org/resources/ethics
  208. https://web.mit.edu/drb/Public/PhotoThesis/
  209. https://listverse.com/2017/12/27/10-photojournalists-disciplined-for-doctoring-pictures/
  210. https://www.npr.org/2012/12/06/166666261/documenting-tragedy-the-ethics-of-photojournalism
  211. https://sites.psu.edu/c409/2017/04/12/blog-4-photojournalism-and-ethical-dilemmas-by-georgi-decarmine/
  212. https://mediaethicsmagazine.com/index.php/browse-back-issues/201-spring-2016-vol-27-no-2/3999107-ethics-in-photojournalism-then-and-now-the-case-of-robert-capa
  213. https://cjf-fjc.ca/photojournalism-ethics/
  214. https://www.mgioeliphotography.com/blog-post/common-photography-myths-debunked
  215. https://www.colorexpertsbd.com/blog/15-photography-myths/
  216. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhotography/comments/1gbeavc/what_are_some_common_photography/
  217. https://digital-photography-school.com/7-commonly-accepted-photography-beliefs-debunked/
  218. https://www.dpreview.com/articles/7333489584/variation-facts-and-fallacies
  219. https://digital-photography-school.com/7-photography-myths-exposed/
  220. https://www.history.com/articles/spirit-photography-civil-war-william-mumler
  221. https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/spirit-photography-occult-images
  222. https://journal.sciencemuseum.ac.uk/article/photographic-plates-and-spirit-fakes-remembering-harry-prices-investigation-of-william-hopes-spirit-photography-at-its-centenary/
  223. https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2016/02/10/do-kirlian-photographs-show-the-soul-of-an-organism/
  224. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2004/04/29/1095552.htm
  225. https://www.chicagotribune.com/2023/11/06/a-chicago-bellhop-claimed-to-create-photos-with-his-thoughts-no-one-could-prove-they-werent-real/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.