Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Mathematics
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on | ||
| Mathematics | ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
|
| ||
Mathematics is a field of study that discovers and organizes methods, theories, and theorems that are developed and proved for the needs of empirical sciences and mathematics itself. There are many areas of mathematics, which include number theory (the study of numbers), algebra (the study of formulas and related structures), geometry (the study of shapes and spaces that contain them), analysis (the study of continuous changes), and set theory (presently used as a foundation for all mathematics).
Mathematics involves the description and manipulation of abstract objects that consist of either abstractions from nature or—in modern mathematics—purely abstract entities that are stipulated to have certain properties, called axioms. Mathematics uses pure reason to prove properties of objects, a proof consisting of a succession of applications of deductive rules to already established results. These results, called theorems, include previously proved theorems, axioms, and—in case of abstraction from nature—some basic properties that are considered true starting points of the theory under consideration.[1]
Mathematics is essential in the natural sciences, engineering, medicine, finance, computer science, and the social sciences. Although mathematics is extensively used for modeling phenomena, the fundamental truths of mathematics are independent of any scientific experimentation. Some areas of mathematics, such as statistics and game theory, are developed in close correlation with their applications and are often grouped under applied mathematics. Other areas are developed independently from any application (and are therefore called pure mathematics) but often later find practical applications.[2][3]
Historically, the concept of a proof and its associated mathematical rigour first appeared in Greek mathematics, most notably in Euclid's Elements.[4] Since its beginning, mathematics was primarily divided into geometry and arithmetic (the manipulation of natural numbers and fractions), until the 16th and 17th centuries, when algebra[a] and infinitesimal calculus were introduced as new fields. Since then, the interaction between mathematical innovations and scientific discoveries has led to a correlated increase in the development of both.[5] At the end of the 19th century, the foundational crisis of mathematics led to the systematization of the axiomatic method,[6] which heralded a dramatic increase in the number of mathematical areas and their fields of application. The contemporary Mathematics Subject Classification lists more than sixty first-level areas of mathematics.
Areas of mathematics
[edit]Before the Renaissance, mathematics was divided into two main areas: arithmetic, regarding the manipulation of numbers, and geometry, regarding the study of shapes.[7] Some types of pseudoscience, such as numerology and astrology, were not then clearly distinguished from mathematics.[8]
During the Renaissance, two more areas appeared. Mathematical notation led to algebra which, roughly speaking, consists of the study and the manipulation of formulas. Calculus, consisting of the two subfields differential calculus and integral calculus, is the study of continuous functions, which model the typically nonlinear relationships between varying quantities, as represented by variables. This division into four main areas—arithmetic, geometry, algebra, and calculus[9]—endured until the end of the 19th century. Areas such as celestial mechanics and solid mechanics were then studied by mathematicians, but now are considered as belonging to physics.[10] The subject of combinatorics has been studied for much of recorded history, yet did not become a separate branch of mathematics until the seventeenth century.[11]
At the end of the 19th century, the foundational crisis in mathematics and the resulting systematization of the axiomatic method led to an explosion of new areas of mathematics.[12][6] The 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification contains no less than sixty-three first-level areas.[13] Some of these areas correspond to the older division, as is true regarding number theory (the modern name for higher arithmetic) and geometry. Several other first-level areas have "geometry" in their names or are otherwise commonly considered part of geometry. Algebra and calculus do not appear as first-level areas but are respectively split into several first-level areas. Other first-level areas emerged during the 20th century or had not previously been considered as mathematics, such as mathematical logic and foundations.[14]
Number theory
[edit]
Number theory began with the manipulation of numbers, that is, natural numbers and later expanded to integers and rational numbers Number theory was once called arithmetic, but nowadays this term is mostly used for numerical calculations.[15] Number theory dates back to ancient Babylon and probably China. Two prominent early number theorists were Euclid of ancient Greece and Diophantus of Alexandria.[16] The modern study of number theory in its abstract form is largely attributed to Pierre de Fermat and Leonhard Euler. The field came to full fruition with the contributions of Adrien-Marie Legendre and Carl Friedrich Gauss.[17]
Many easily stated number problems have solutions that require sophisticated methods, often from across mathematics. A prominent example is Fermat's Last Theorem. This conjecture was stated in 1637 by Pierre de Fermat, but it was proved only in 1994 by Andrew Wiles, who used tools including scheme theory from algebraic geometry, category theory, and homological algebra.[18] Another example is Goldbach's conjecture, which asserts that every even integer greater than 2 is the sum of two prime numbers. Stated in 1742 by Christian Goldbach, it remains unproven despite considerable effort.[19]
Number theory includes several subareas, including analytic number theory, algebraic number theory, geometry of numbers (method oriented), Diophantine analysis, and transcendence theory (problem oriented).[14]
Geometry
[edit]
Geometry is one of the oldest branches of mathematics. It started with empirical recipes concerning shapes, such as lines, angles and circles, which were developed mainly for the needs of surveying and architecture, but has since blossomed out into many other subfields.[20]
A fundamental innovation was the ancient Greeks' introduction of the concept of proofs, which require that every assertion must be proved. For example, it is not sufficient to verify by measurement that, say, two lengths are equal; their equality must be proven via reasoning from previously accepted results (theorems) and a few basic statements. The basic statements are not subject to proof because they are self-evident (postulates), or are part of the definition of the subject of study (axioms). This principle, foundational for all mathematics, was first elaborated for geometry, and was systematized by Euclid around 300 BC in his book Elements.[21][22]
The resulting Euclidean geometry is the study of shapes and their arrangements constructed from lines, planes and circles in the Euclidean plane (plane geometry) and the three-dimensional Euclidean space.[b][20]
Euclidean geometry was developed without change of methods or scope until the 17th century, when René Descartes introduced what is now called Cartesian coordinates. This constituted a major change of paradigm: Instead of defining real numbers as lengths of line segments (see number line), it allowed the representation of points using their coordinates, which are numbers. Algebra (and later, calculus) can thus be used to solve geometrical problems. Geometry was split into two new subfields: synthetic geometry, which uses purely geometrical methods, and analytic geometry, which uses coordinates systemically.[23]
Analytic geometry allows the study of curves unrelated to circles and lines. Such curves can be defined as the graph of functions, the study of which led to differential geometry. They can also be defined as implicit equations, often polynomial equations (which spawned algebraic geometry). Analytic geometry also makes it possible to consider Euclidean spaces of higher than three dimensions.[20]
In the 19th century, mathematicians discovered non-Euclidean geometries, which do not follow the parallel postulate. By questioning that postulate's truth, this discovery has been viewed as joining Russell's paradox in revealing the foundational crisis of mathematics. This aspect of the crisis was solved by systematizing the axiomatic method, and adopting that the truth of the chosen axioms is not a mathematical problem.[24][6] In turn, the axiomatic method allows for the study of various geometries obtained either by changing the axioms or by considering properties that do not change under specific transformations of the space.[25]
Today's subareas of geometry include:[14]
- Projective geometry, introduced in the 16th century by Girard Desargues, extends Euclidean geometry by adding points at infinity at which parallel lines intersect. This simplifies many aspects of classical geometry by unifying the treatments for intersecting and parallel lines.
- Affine geometry, the study of properties relative to parallelism and independent from the concept of length.
- Differential geometry, the study of curves, surfaces, and their generalizations, which are defined using differentiable functions.
- Manifold theory, the study of shapes that are not necessarily embedded in a larger space.
- Riemannian geometry, the study of distance properties in curved spaces.
- Algebraic geometry, the study of curves, surfaces, and their generalizations, which are defined using polynomials.
- Topology, the study of properties that are kept under continuous deformations.
- Algebraic topology, the use in topology of algebraic methods, mainly homological algebra.
- Discrete geometry, the study of finite configurations in geometry.
- Convex geometry, the study of convex sets, which takes its importance from its applications in optimization.
- Complex geometry, the geometry obtained by replacing real numbers with complex numbers.
Algebra
[edit]

Algebra is the art of manipulating equations and formulas. Diophantus (3rd century) and al-Khwarizmi (9th century) were the two main precursors of algebra.[27][28] Diophantus solved some equations involving unknown natural numbers by deducing new relations until he obtained the solution.[29] Al-Khwarizmi introduced systematic methods for transforming equations, such as moving a term from one side of an equation into the other side.[30] The term algebra is derived from the Arabic word al-jabr meaning 'the reunion of broken parts' that he used for naming one of these methods in the title of his main treatise.[31][32]
Algebra became an area in its own right only with François Viète (1540–1603), who introduced the use of variables for representing unknown or unspecified numbers.[33] Variables allow mathematicians to describe the operations that have to be done on the numbers represented using mathematical formulas.[34]
Until the 19th century, algebra consisted mainly of the study of linear equations (presently linear algebra), and polynomial equations in a single unknown, which were called algebraic equations (a term still in use, although it may be ambiguous). During the 19th century, mathematicians began to use variables to represent things other than numbers (such as matrices, modular integers, and geometric transformations), on which generalizations of arithmetic operations are often valid.[35] The concept of algebraic structure addresses this, consisting of a set whose elements are unspecified, of operations acting on the elements of the set, and rules that these operations must follow. The scope of algebra thus grew to include the study of algebraic structures. This object of algebra was called modern algebra or abstract algebra, as established by the influence and works of Emmy Noether,[36] and popularized by Van der Waerden's book Moderne Algebra.
Some types of algebraic structures have useful and often fundamental properties, in many areas of mathematics. Their study became autonomous parts of algebra, and include:[14]
- group theory
- field theory
- vector spaces, whose study is essentially the same as linear algebra
- ring theory
- commutative algebra, which is the study of commutative rings, includes the study of polynomials, and is a foundational part of algebraic geometry
- homological algebra
- Lie algebra and Lie group theory
- Boolean algebra, which is widely used for the study of the logical structure of computers
The study of types of algebraic structures as mathematical objects is the purpose of universal algebra and category theory.[37] The latter applies to every mathematical structure (not only algebraic ones). At its origin, it was introduced, together with homological algebra for allowing the algebraic study of non-algebraic objects such as topological spaces; this particular area of application is called algebraic topology.[38]
Calculus and analysis
[edit]
Calculus, formerly called infinitesimal calculus, was introduced independently and simultaneously by 17th-century mathematicians Newton and Leibniz.[39] It is fundamentally the study of the relationship between variables that depend continuously on each other. Calculus was expanded in the 18th century by Euler with the introduction of the concept of a function and many other results.[40] Presently, "calculus" refers mainly to the elementary part of this theory, and "analysis" is commonly used for advanced parts.[41]
Analysis is further subdivided into real analysis, where variables represent real numbers, and complex analysis, where variables represent complex numbers. Analysis includes many subareas shared by other areas of mathematics which include:[14]
- Multivariable calculus
- Functional analysis, where variables represent varying functions
- Integration, measure theory and potential theory, all strongly related with probability theory on a continuum
- Ordinary differential equations
- Partial differential equations
- Numerical analysis, mainly devoted to the computation on computers of solutions of ordinary and partial differential equations that arise in many applications
Discrete mathematics
[edit]
Discrete mathematics, broadly speaking, is the study of individual, countable mathematical objects. An example is the set of all integers.[42] Because the objects of study here are discrete, the methods of calculus and mathematical analysis do not directly apply.[c] Algorithms—especially their implementation and computational complexity—play a major role in discrete mathematics.[43]
The four color theorem and optimal sphere packing were two major problems of discrete mathematics solved in the second half of the 20th century.[44] The P versus NP problem, which remains open to this day, is also important for discrete mathematics, since its solution would potentially impact a large number of computationally difficult problems.[45]
Discrete mathematics includes:[14]
- Combinatorics, the art of enumerating mathematical objects that satisfy some given constraints. Originally, these objects were elements or subsets of a given set; this has been extended to various objects, which establishes a strong link between combinatorics and other parts of discrete mathematics. For example, discrete geometry includes counting configurations of geometric shapes.
- Graph theory and hypergraphs
- Coding theory, including error correcting codes and a part of cryptography
- Matroid theory
- Discrete geometry
- Discrete probability distributions
- Game theory (although continuous games are also studied, most common games, such as chess and poker are discrete)
- Discrete optimization, including combinatorial optimization, integer programming, constraint programming
Mathematical logic and set theory
[edit]
The two subjects of mathematical logic and set theory have belonged to mathematics since the end of the 19th century.[46][47] Before this period, sets were not considered to be mathematical objects, and logic, although used for mathematical proofs, belonged to philosophy and was not specifically studied by mathematicians.[48]
Before Cantor's study of infinite sets, mathematicians were reluctant to consider actually infinite collections, and considered infinity to be the result of endless enumeration. Cantor's work offended many mathematicians not only by considering actually infinite sets[49] but by showing that this implies different sizes of infinity, per Cantor's diagonal argument. This led to the controversy over Cantor's set theory.[50] In the same period, various areas of mathematics concluded the former intuitive definitions of the basic mathematical objects were insufficient for ensuring mathematical rigour.[51]
This became the foundational crisis of mathematics.[52] It was eventually solved in mainstream mathematics by systematizing the axiomatic method inside a formalized set theory. Roughly speaking, each mathematical object is defined by the set of all similar objects and the properties that these objects must have.[12] For example, in Peano arithmetic, the natural numbers are defined by "zero is a number", "each number has a unique successor", "each number but zero has a unique predecessor", and some rules of reasoning.[53] This mathematical abstraction from reality is embodied in the modern philosophy of formalism, as founded by David Hilbert around 1910.[54]
The "nature" of the objects defined this way is a philosophical problem that mathematicians leave to philosophers, even if many mathematicians have opinions on this nature, and use their opinion—sometimes called "intuition"—to guide their study and proofs. The approach allows considering "logics" (that is, sets of allowed deducing rules), theorems, proofs, etc. as mathematical objects, and to prove theorems about them. For example, Gödel's incompleteness theorems assert, roughly speaking that, in every consistent formal system that contains the natural numbers, there are theorems that are true (that is provable in a stronger system), but not provable inside the system.[55] This approach to the foundations of mathematics was challenged during the first half of the 20th century by mathematicians led by Brouwer, who promoted intuitionistic logic, which explicitly lacks the law of excluded middle.[56][57]
These problems and debates led to a wide expansion of mathematical logic, with subareas such as model theory (modeling some logical theories inside other theories), proof theory, type theory, computability theory and computational complexity theory.[14] Although these aspects of mathematical logic were introduced before the rise of computers, their use in compiler design, formal verification, program analysis, proof assistants and other aspects of computer science, contributed in turn to the expansion of these logical theories.[58]
Statistics and other decision sciences
[edit]
The field of statistics is a mathematical application that is employed for the collection and processing of data samples, using procedures based on mathematical methods especially probability theory. Statisticians generate data with random sampling or randomized experiments.[60]
Statistical theory studies decision problems such as minimizing the risk (expected loss) of a statistical action, such as using a procedure in, for example, parameter estimation, hypothesis testing, and selecting the best. In these traditional areas of mathematical statistics, a statistical-decision problem is formulated by minimizing an objective function, like expected loss or cost, under specific constraints. For example, designing a survey often involves minimizing the cost of estimating a population mean with a given level of confidence.[61] Because of its use of optimization, the mathematical theory of statistics overlaps with other decision sciences, such as operations research, control theory, and mathematical economics.[62]
Computational mathematics
[edit]Computational mathematics is the study of mathematical problems that are typically too large for human, numerical capacity.[63][64] Numerical analysis studies methods for problems in analysis using functional analysis and approximation theory; numerical analysis broadly includes the study of approximation and discretization with special focus on rounding errors.[65] Numerical analysis and, more broadly, scientific computing also study non-analytic topics of mathematical science, especially algorithmic-matrix-and-graph theory. Other areas of computational mathematics include computer algebra and symbolic computation.
History
[edit]Etymology
[edit]The word mathematics comes from the Ancient Greek word máthēma (μάθημα), meaning 'something learned, knowledge, mathematics', and the derived expression mathēmatikḗ tékhnē (μαθηματικὴ τέχνη), meaning 'mathematical science'. It entered the English language during the Late Middle English period through French and Latin.[66]
Similarly, one of the two main schools of thought in Pythagoreanism was known as the mathēmatikoi (μαθηματικοί)—which at the time meant "learners" rather than "mathematicians" in the modern sense. The Pythagoreans were likely the first to constrain the use of the word to just the study of arithmetic and geometry. By the time of Aristotle (384–322 BC) this meaning was fully established.[67]
In Latin and English, until around 1700, the term mathematics more commonly meant "astrology" (or sometimes "astronomy") rather than "mathematics"; the meaning gradually changed to its present one from about 1500 to 1800. This change has resulted in several mistranslations: For example, Saint Augustine's warning that Christians should beware of mathematici, meaning "astrologers", is sometimes mistranslated as a condemnation of mathematicians.[68]
The apparent plural form in English goes back to the Latin neuter plural mathematica (Cicero), based on the Greek plural ta mathēmatiká (τὰ μαθηματικά) and means roughly "all things mathematical", although it is plausible that English borrowed only the adjective mathematic(al) and formed the noun mathematics anew, after the pattern of physics and metaphysics, inherited from Greek.[69] In English, the noun mathematics takes a singular verb. It is often shortened to maths[70] or, in North America, math.[71]
Ancient
[edit]
In addition to recognizing how to count physical objects, prehistoric peoples may have also known how to count abstract quantities, like time—days, seasons, or years.[72][73] Evidence for more complex mathematics does not appear until around 3000 BC, when the Babylonians and Egyptians began using arithmetic, algebra, and geometry for taxation and other financial calculations, for building and construction, and for astronomy.[74] The oldest mathematical texts from Mesopotamia and Egypt are from 2000 to 1800 BC.[75] Many early texts mention Pythagorean triples and so, by inference, the Pythagorean theorem seems to be the most ancient and widespread mathematical concept after basic arithmetic and geometry. It is in Babylonian mathematics that elementary arithmetic (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) first appear in the archaeological record. The Babylonians also possessed a place-value system and used a sexagesimal numeral system which is still in use today for measuring angles and time.[76]
In the 6th century BC, Greek mathematics began to emerge as a distinct discipline and some Ancient Greeks such as the Pythagoreans appeared to have considered it a subject in its own right.[77] Around 300 BC, Euclid organized mathematical knowledge by way of postulates and first principles, which evolved into the axiomatic method that is used in mathematics today, consisting of definition, axiom, theorem, and proof.[78] His book, Elements, is widely considered the most successful and influential textbook of all time.[79] The greatest mathematician of antiquity is often held to be Archimedes (c. 287 – c. 212 BC) of Syracuse.[80] He developed formulas for calculating the surface area and volume of solids of revolution and used the method of exhaustion to calculate the area under the arc of a parabola with the summation of an infinite series, in a manner not too dissimilar from modern calculus.[81] Other notable achievements of Greek mathematics are conic sections (Apollonius of Perga, 3rd century BC),[82] trigonometry (Hipparchus of Nicaea, 2nd century BC),[83] and the beginnings of algebra (Diophantus, 3rd century AD).[84]

The Hindu–Arabic numeral system and the rules for the use of its operations, in use throughout the world today, evolved over the course of the first millennium AD in India and were transmitted to the Western world via Islamic mathematics.[85] Other notable developments of Indian mathematics include the modern definition and approximation of sine and cosine, and an early form of infinite series.[86][87]
Medieval and later
[edit]
During the Golden Age of Islam, especially during the 9th and 10th centuries, mathematics saw many important innovations building on Greek mathematics. The most notable achievement of Islamic mathematics was the development of algebra. Other achievements of the Islamic period include advances in spherical trigonometry and the addition of the decimal point to the Arabic numeral system.[88] Many notable mathematicians from this period were Persian, such as Al-Khwarizmi, Omar Khayyam and Sharaf al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī.[89] The Greek and Arabic mathematical texts were in turn translated to Latin during the Middle Ages and made available in Europe.[90]
During the early modern period, mathematics began to develop at an accelerating pace in Western Europe, with innovations that revolutionized mathematics, such as the introduction of variables and symbolic notation by François Viète (1540–1603), the introduction of logarithms by John Napier in 1614, which greatly simplified numerical calculations, especially for astronomy and marine navigation, the introduction of coordinates by René Descartes (1596–1650) for reducing geometry to algebra, and the development of calculus by Isaac Newton (1643–1727) and Gottfried Leibniz (1646–1716). Leonhard Euler (1707–1783), the most notable mathematician of the 18th century, unified these innovations into a single corpus with a standardized terminology, and completed them with the discovery and the proof of numerous theorems.[91]

Perhaps the foremost mathematician of the 19th century was the German mathematician Carl Gauss, who made numerous contributions to fields such as algebra, analysis, differential geometry, matrix theory, number theory, and statistics.[92] In the early 20th century, Kurt Gödel transformed mathematics by publishing his incompleteness theorems, which show in part that any consistent axiomatic system—if powerful enough to describe arithmetic—will contain true propositions that cannot be proved.[55]
Mathematics has since been greatly extended, and there has been a fruitful interaction between mathematics and science, to the benefit of both. Mathematical discoveries continue to be made to this very day. According to Mikhail B. Sevryuk, in the January 2006 issue of the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, "The number of papers and books included in the Mathematical Reviews (MR) database since 1940 (the first year of operation of MR) is now more than 1.9 million, and more than 75 thousand items are added to the database each year. The overwhelming majority of works in this ocean contain new mathematical theorems and their proofs."[93]
Symbolic notation and terminology
[edit]
Mathematical notation is widely used in science and engineering for representing complex concepts and properties in a concise, unambiguous, and accurate way. This notation consists of symbols used for representing operations, unspecified numbers, relations and any other mathematical objects, and then assembling them into expressions and formulas.[94] More precisely, numbers and other mathematical objects are represented by symbols called variables, which are generally Latin or Greek letters, and often include subscripts. Operation and relations are generally represented by specific symbols or glyphs,[95] such as + (plus), × (multiplication), (integral), = (equal), and < (less than).[96] All these symbols are generally grouped according to specific rules to form expressions and formulas.[97] Normally, expressions and formulas do not appear alone, but are included in sentences of the current language, where expressions play the role of noun phrases and formulas play the role of clauses.
Mathematics has developed a rich terminology covering a broad range of fields that study the properties of various abstract, idealized objects and how they interact. It is based on rigorous definitions that provide a standard foundation for communication. An axiom or postulate is a mathematical statement that is taken to be true without need of proof. If a mathematical statement has yet to be proven (or disproven), it is termed a conjecture. Through a series of rigorous arguments employing deductive reasoning, a statement that is proven to be true becomes a theorem. A specialized theorem that is mainly used to prove another theorem is called a lemma. A proven instance that forms part of a more general finding is termed a corollary.[98]
Numerous technical terms used in mathematics are neologisms, such as polynomial and homeomorphism.[99] Other technical terms are words of the common language that are used in an accurate meaning that may differ slightly from their common meaning. For example, in mathematics, "or" means "one, the other or both", while, in common language, it is either ambiguous or means "one or the other but not both" (in mathematics, the latter is called "exclusive or"). Finally, many mathematical terms are common words that are used with a completely different meaning.[100] This may lead to sentences that are correct and true mathematical assertions, but appear to be nonsense to people who do not have the required background. For example, "every free module is flat" and "a field is always a ring".
Relationship with sciences
[edit]Mathematics is used in most sciences for modeling phenomena, which then allows predictions to be made from experimental laws.[101] The independence of mathematical truth from any experimentation implies that the accuracy of such predictions depends only on the adequacy of the model.[102] Inaccurate predictions, rather than being caused by invalid mathematical concepts, imply the need to change the mathematical model used.[103] For example, the perihelion precession of Mercury could only be explained after the emergence of Einstein's general relativity, which replaced Newton's law of gravitation as a better mathematical model.[104]
There is still a philosophical debate whether mathematics is a science. However, in practice, mathematicians are typically grouped with scientists, and mathematics shares much in common with the physical sciences. Like them, it is falsifiable, which means in mathematics that, if a result or a theory is wrong, this can be proved by providing a counterexample. Similarly as in science, theories and results (theorems) are often obtained from experimentation.[105] In mathematics, the experimentation may consist of computation on selected examples or of the study of figures or other representations of mathematical objects (often mind representations without physical support). For example, when asked how he came about his theorems, Gauss once replied "durch planmässiges Tattonieren" (through systematic experimentation).[106] However, some authors emphasize that mathematics differs from the modern notion of science by not relying on empirical evidence.[107][108][109][110]
Pure and applied mathematics
[edit]Until the 19th century, the development of mathematics in the West was mainly motivated by the needs of technology and science, and there was no clear distinction between pure and applied mathematics.[111] For example, the natural numbers and arithmetic were introduced for the need of counting, and geometry was motivated by surveying, architecture, and astronomy. Later, Isaac Newton introduced infinitesimal calculus for explaining the movement of the planets with his law of gravitation. Moreover, most mathematicians were also scientists, and many scientists were also mathematicians.[112] However, a notable exception occurred with the tradition of pure mathematics in Ancient Greece.[113] The problem of integer factorization, for example, which goes back to Euclid in 300 BC, had no practical application before its use in the RSA cryptosystem, now widely used for the security of computer networks.[114]
In the 19th century, mathematicians such as Karl Weierstrass and Richard Dedekind increasingly focused their research on internal problems, that is, pure mathematics.[111][115] This led to split mathematics into pure mathematics and applied mathematics, the latter being often considered as having a lower value among mathematical purists. However, the lines between the two are frequently blurred.[116]
The aftermath of World War II led to a surge in the development of applied mathematics in the US and elsewhere.[117][118] Many of the theories developed for applications were found interesting from the point of view of pure mathematics, and many results of pure mathematics were shown to have applications outside mathematics; in turn, the study of these applications may give new insights on the "pure theory".[119][120]
An example of the first case is the theory of distributions, introduced by Laurent Schwartz for validating computations done in quantum mechanics, which became immediately an important tool of (pure) mathematical analysis.[121] An example of the second case is the decidability of the first-order theory of the real numbers, a problem of pure mathematics that was proved true by Alfred Tarski, with an algorithm that is impossible to implement because of a computational complexity that is much too high.[122] For getting an algorithm that can be implemented and can solve systems of polynomial equations and inequalities, George Collins introduced the cylindrical algebraic decomposition that became a fundamental tool in real algebraic geometry.[123]
In the present day, the distinction between pure and applied mathematics is more a question of personal research aim of mathematicians than a division of mathematics into broad areas.[124][125] The Mathematics Subject Classification has a section for "general applied mathematics" but does not mention "pure mathematics".[14] However, these terms are still used in names of some university departments, such as at the Faculty of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge.
Unreasonable effectiveness
[edit]The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics is a phenomenon that was named and first made explicit by physicist Eugene Wigner.[3] It is the fact that many mathematical theories (even the "purest") have applications outside their initial object. These applications may be completely outside their initial area of mathematics, and may concern physical phenomena that were completely unknown when the mathematical theory was introduced.[126] Examples of unexpected applications of mathematical theories can be found in many areas of mathematics.
A notable example is the prime factorization of natural numbers that was discovered more than 2,000 years before its common use for secure internet communications through the RSA cryptosystem.[127] A second historical example is the theory of ellipses. They were studied by the ancient Greek mathematicians as conic sections (that is, intersections of cones with planes). It was almost 2,000 years later that Johannes Kepler discovered that the trajectories of the planets are ellipses.[128]
In the 19th century, the internal development of geometry (pure mathematics) led to definition and study of non-Euclidean geometries, spaces of dimension higher than three and manifolds. At this time, these concepts seemed totally disconnected from the physical reality, but at the beginning of the 20th century, Albert Einstein developed the theory of relativity that uses fundamentally these concepts. In particular, spacetime of special relativity is a non-Euclidean space of dimension four, and spacetime of general relativity is a (curved) manifold of dimension four.[129][130]
A striking aspect of the interaction between mathematics and physics is when mathematics drives research in physics. This is illustrated by the discoveries of the positron and the baryon In both cases, the equations of the theories had unexplained solutions, which led to conjecture of the existence of an unknown particle, and the search for these particles. In both cases, these particles were discovered a few years later by specific experiments.[131][132][133]
Specific sciences
[edit]Physics
[edit]
Mathematics and physics have influenced each other over their modern history. Modern physics uses mathematics abundantly,[134] and is also considered to be the motivation of major mathematical developments.[135]
Computing
[edit]Computing is closely related to mathematics in several ways.[136] Theoretical computer science is considered to be mathematical in nature.[137] Communication technologies apply branches of mathematics that may be very old (e.g., arithmetic), especially with respect to transmission security, in cryptography and coding theory. Discrete mathematics is useful in many areas of computer science, such as complexity theory, information theory, and graph theory.[138] In 1998, the Kepler conjecture on sphere packing seemed to also be partially proven by computer.[139]
Biology and chemistry
[edit]
Biology uses probability extensively in fields such as ecology or neurobiology.[140] Most discussion of probability centers on the concept of evolutionary fitness.[140] Ecology heavily uses modeling to simulate population dynamics,[140][141] study ecosystems such as the predator-prey model, measure pollution diffusion,[142] or to assess climate change.[143] The dynamics of a population can be modeled by coupled differential equations, such as the Lotka–Volterra equations.[144]
Statistical hypothesis testing, is run on data from clinical trials to determine whether a new treatment works.[145] Since the start of the 20th century, chemistry has used computing to model molecules in three dimensions.[146]
Earth sciences
[edit]Structural geology and climatology use probabilistic models to predict the risk of natural catastrophes.[147] Similarly, meteorology, oceanography, and planetology also use mathematics due to their heavy use of models.[148][149][150]
Social sciences
[edit]Areas of mathematics used in the social sciences include probability/statistics and differential equations. These are used in linguistics, economics, sociology,[151] and psychology.[152]

Often the fundamental postulate of mathematical economics is that of the rational individual actor – Homo economicus (lit. 'economic man').[153] In this model, the individual seeks to maximize their self-interest,[153] and always makes optimal choices using perfect information.[154] This atomistic view of economics allows it to relatively easily mathematize its thinking, because individual calculations are transposed into mathematical calculations. Such mathematical modeling allows one to probe economic mechanisms. Some reject or criticise the concept of Homo economicus. Economists note that real people have limited information, make poor choices, and care about fairness and altruism, not just personal gain.[155]
Without mathematical modeling, it is hard to go beyond statistical observations or untestable speculation. Mathematical modeling allows economists to create structured frameworks to test hypotheses and analyze complex interactions. Models provide clarity and precision, enabling the translation of theoretical concepts into quantifiable predictions that can be tested against real-world data.[156]
At the start of the 20th century, there was a development to express historical movements in formulas. In 1922, Nikolai Kondratiev discerned the ~50-year-long Kondratiev cycle, which explains phases of economic growth or crisis.[157] Towards the end of the 19th century, mathematicians extended their analysis into geopolitics.[158] Peter Turchin developed cliodynamics in the 1990s.[159]
Mathematization of the social sciences is not without risk. In the controversial book Fashionable Nonsense (1997), Sokal and Bricmont denounced the unfounded or abusive use of scientific terminology, particularly from mathematics or physics, in the social sciences.[160] The study of complex systems (evolution of unemployment, business capital, demographic evolution of a population, etc.) uses mathematical knowledge. However, the choice of counting criteria, particularly for unemployment, or of models, can be subject to controversy.[161][162]
Philosophy
[edit]Reality
[edit]The connection between mathematics and material reality has led to philosophical debates since at least the time of Pythagoras. The ancient philosopher Plato argued that abstractions that reflect material reality have themselves a reality that exists outside space and time. As a result, the philosophical view that mathematical objects somehow exist on their own in abstraction is often referred to as Platonism. Independently of their possible philosophical opinions, modern mathematicians may be generally considered as Platonists, since they think of and talk of their objects of study as real objects.[163]
Armand Borel summarized this view of mathematics reality as follows, and provided quotations of G. H. Hardy, Charles Hermite, Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein that support his views.[131]
Something becomes objective (as opposed to "subjective") as soon as we are convinced that it exists in the minds of others in the same form as it does in ours and that we can think about it and discuss it together.[164] Because the language of mathematics is so precise, it is ideally suited to defining concepts for which such a consensus exists. In my opinion, that is sufficient to provide us with a feeling of an objective existence, of a reality of mathematics ...
Nevertheless, Platonism and the concurrent views on abstraction do not explain the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics (as Platonism assumes mathematics exists independently, but does not explain why it matches reality).[165]
Proposed definitions
[edit]There is no general consensus about the definition of mathematics or its epistemological status—that is, its place inside knowledge. A great many professional mathematicians take no interest in a definition of mathematics, or consider it undefinable. There is not even consensus on whether mathematics is an art or a science. Some just say, "mathematics is what mathematicians do".[166][167] A common approach is to define mathematics by its object of study.[168][169][170][171]
Aristotle defined mathematics as "the science of quantity" and this definition prevailed until the 18th century. However, Aristotle also noted a focus on quantity alone may not distinguish mathematics from sciences like physics; in his view, abstraction and studying quantity as a property "separable in thought" from real instances set mathematics apart.[172] In the 19th century, when mathematicians began to address topics—such as infinite sets—which have no clear-cut relation to physical reality, a variety of new definitions were given.[173] With the large number of new areas of mathematics that have appeared since the beginning of the 20th century, defining mathematics by its object of study has become increasingly difficult.[174] For example, in lieu of a definition, Saunders Mac Lane in Mathematics, form and function summarizes the basics of several areas of mathematics, emphasizing their inter-connectedness, and observes:[175]
the development of Mathematics provides a tightly connected network of formal rules, concepts, and systems. Nodes of this network are closely bound to procedures useful in human activities and to questions arising in science. The transition from activities to the formal Mathematical systems is guided by a variety of general insights and ideas.
Another approach for defining mathematics is to use its methods. For example, an area of study is often qualified as mathematics as soon as one can prove theorems—assertions whose validity relies on a proof, that is, a purely logical deduction.[d][176][failed verification]
Rigor
[edit]Mathematical reasoning requires rigor. This means that the definitions must be absolutely unambiguous and the proofs must be reducible to a succession of applications of inference rules,[e] without any use of empirical evidence and intuition.[f][177] Rigorous reasoning is not specific to mathematics, but, in mathematics, the standard of rigor is much higher than elsewhere. Despite mathematics' concision, rigorous proofs can require hundreds of pages to express, such as the 255-page Feit–Thompson theorem.[g] The emergence of computer-assisted proofs has allowed proof lengths to further expand.[h][178] The result of this trend is a philosophy of the quasi-empiricist proof that can not be considered infallible, but has a probability attached to it.[6]
The concept of rigor in mathematics dates back to ancient Greece, where their society encouraged logical, deductive reasoning. However, this rigorous approach would tend to discourage exploration of new approaches, such as irrational numbers and concepts of infinity. The method of demonstrating rigorous proof was enhanced in the sixteenth century through the use of symbolic notation. In the 18th century, social transition led to mathematicians earning their keep through teaching, which led to more careful thinking about the underlying concepts of mathematics. This produced more rigorous approaches, while transitioning from geometric methods to algebraic and then arithmetic proofs.[6]
At the end of the 19th century, it appeared that the definitions of the basic concepts of mathematics were not accurate enough for avoiding paradoxes (non-Euclidean geometries and Weierstrass function) and contradictions (Russell's paradox). This was solved by the inclusion of axioms with the apodictic inference rules of mathematical theories; the re-introduction of axiomatic method pioneered by the ancient Greeks.[6] It results that "rigor" is no more a relevant concept in mathematics, as a proof is either correct or erroneous, and a "rigorous proof" is simply a pleonasm. Where a special concept of rigor comes into play is in the socialized aspects of a proof, wherein it may be demonstrably refuted by other mathematicians. After a proof has been accepted for many years or even decades, it can then be considered as reliable.[179]
Nevertheless, the concept of "rigor" may remain useful for teaching to beginners what is a mathematical proof.[180]
Training and practice
[edit]Education
[edit]Mathematics has a remarkable ability to cross cultural boundaries and time periods. As a human activity, the practice of mathematics has a social side, which includes education, careers, recognition, popularization, and so on. In education, mathematics is a core part of the curriculum and forms an important element of the STEM academic disciplines. Prominent careers for professional mathematicians include mathematics teacher or professor, statistician, actuary, financial analyst, economist, accountant, commodity trader, or computer consultant.[181]
Archaeological evidence shows that instruction in mathematics occurred as early as the second millennium BCE in ancient Babylonia.[182] Comparable evidence has been unearthed for scribal mathematics training in the ancient Near East and then for the Greco-Roman world starting around 300 BCE.[183] The oldest known mathematics textbook is the Rhind papyrus, dated from c. 1650 BCE in Egypt.[184] Due to a scarcity of books, mathematical teachings in ancient India were communicated using memorized oral tradition since the Vedic period (c. 1500 – c. 500 BCE).[185] In Imperial China during the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE), a mathematics curriculum was adopted for the civil service exam to join the state bureaucracy.[186]
Following the Dark Ages, mathematics education in Europe was provided by religious schools as part of the Quadrivium. Formal instruction in pedagogy began with Jesuit schools in the 16th and 17th century. Most mathematical curricula remained at a basic and practical level until the nineteenth century, when it began to flourish in France and Germany. The oldest journal addressing instruction in mathematics was L'Enseignement Mathématique, which began publication in 1899.[187] The Western advancements in science and technology led to the establishment of centralized education systems in many nation-states, with mathematics as a core component—initially for its military applications.[188] While the content of courses varies, in the present day nearly all countries teach mathematics to students for significant amounts of time.[189]
During school, mathematical capabilities and positive expectations have a strong association with career interest in the field. Extrinsic factors such as feedback motivation by teachers, parents, and peer groups can influence the level of interest in mathematics.[190] Some students studying mathematics may develop an apprehension or fear about their performance in the subject. This is known as mathematical anxiety, and is considered the most prominent of the disorders impacting academic performance. Mathematical anxiety can develop due to various factors such as parental and teacher attitudes, social stereotypes, and personal traits. Help to counteract the anxiety can come from changes in instructional approaches, by interactions with parents and teachers, and by tailored treatments for the individual.[191]
Psychology (aesthetic, creativity and intuition)
[edit]The validity of a mathematical theorem relies only on the rigor of its proof, which could theoretically be done automatically by a computer program. This does not mean that there is no place for creativity in a mathematical work. On the contrary, many important mathematical results (theorems) are solutions of problems that other mathematicians failed to solve, and the invention of a way for solving them may be a fundamental way of the solving process.[192][193] An extreme example is Apery's theorem: Roger Apery provided only the ideas for a proof, and the formal proof was given only several months later by three other mathematicians.[194]
Creativity and rigor are not the only psychological aspects of the activity of mathematicians. Some mathematicians can see their activity as a game, more specifically as solving puzzles.[195] This aspect of mathematical activity is emphasized in recreational mathematics.
Mathematicians can find an aesthetic value to mathematics. Like beauty, it is hard to define, it is commonly related to elegance, which involves qualities like simplicity, symmetry, completeness, and generality. G. H. Hardy in A Mathematician's Apology expressed the belief that the aesthetic considerations are, in themselves, sufficient to justify the study of pure mathematics. He also identified other criteria such as significance, unexpectedness, and inevitability, which contribute to mathematical aesthetics.[196] Paul Erdős expressed this sentiment more ironically by speaking of "The Book", a supposed divine collection of the most beautiful proofs. The 1998 book Proofs from THE BOOK, inspired by Erdős, is a collection of particularly succinct and revelatory mathematical arguments. Some examples of particularly elegant results included are Euclid's proof that there are infinitely many prime numbers and the fast Fourier transform for harmonic analysis.[197]
Some feel that to consider mathematics a science is to downplay its artistry and history in the seven traditional liberal arts.[198] One way this difference of viewpoint plays out is in the philosophical debate as to whether mathematical results are created (as in art) or discovered (as in science).[131] The popularity of recreational mathematics is another sign of the pleasure many find in solving mathematical questions.
Cultural impact
[edit]Artistic expression
[edit]Notes that sound well together to a Western ear are sounds whose fundamental frequencies of vibration are in simple ratios. For example, an octave doubles the frequency and a perfect fifth multiplies it by .[199][200]

Humans, as well as some other animals, find symmetric patterns to be more beautiful.[201] Mathematically, the symmetries of an object form a group known as the symmetry group.[202] For example, the group underlying mirror symmetry is the cyclic group of two elements, . A Rorschach test is a figure invariant by this symmetry,[203] as are butterfly and animal bodies more generally (at least on the surface).[204] Waves on the sea surface possess translation symmetry: moving one's viewpoint by the distance between wave crests does not change one's view of the sea.[205] Fractals possess self-similarity.[206][207]
Popularization
[edit]Popular mathematics is the act of presenting mathematics without technical terms.[208] Presenting mathematics may be hard since the general public suffers from mathematical anxiety and mathematical objects are highly abstract.[209] However, popular mathematics writing can overcome this by using applications or cultural links.[210] Despite this, mathematics is rarely the topic of popularization in printed or televised media.
Awards and prize problems
[edit]
The most prestigious award in mathematics is the Fields Medal,[211][212] established by Canadian John Charles Fields in 1936 and awarded every four years (except around World War II) to up to four individuals.[213][214] It is considered the mathematical equivalent of the Nobel Prize.[214]
Other prestigious mathematics awards include:[215]
- The Abel Prize, instituted in 2002[216] and first awarded in 2003[217]
- The Chern Medal for lifetime achievement, introduced in 2009[218] and first awarded in 2010[219]
- The AMS Leroy P. Steele Prize, awarded since 1970[220]
- The Wolf Prize in Mathematics, also for lifetime achievement,[221] instituted in 1978[222]
A famous list of 23 open problems, called "Hilbert's problems", was compiled in 1900 by German mathematician David Hilbert.[223] This list has achieved great celebrity among mathematicians,[224] and at least thirteen of the problems (depending how some are interpreted) have been solved.[223]
A new list of seven important problems, titled the "Millennium Prize Problems", was published in 2000. Only one of them, the Riemann hypothesis, duplicates one of Hilbert's problems. A solution to any of these problems carries a 1 million dollar reward.[225] To date, only one of these problems, the Poincaré conjecture, has been solved, by the Russian mathematician Grigori Perelman.[226]
See also
[edit]- Law (mathematics)
- List of mathematical jargon
- Lists of mathematicians
- Lists of mathematics topics
- Mathematical constant
- Mathematical sciences
- Mathematics and art
- Mathematics education
- Philosophy of mathematics
- Relationship between mathematics and physics
- Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
Notes
[edit]- ^ Here, algebra is taken in its modern sense, which is, roughly speaking, the art of manipulating formulas.
- ^ This includes conic sections, which are intersections of circular cylinders and planes.
- ^ However, some advanced methods of analysis are sometimes used; for example, methods of complex analysis applied to generating series.
- ^ For example, logic belongs to philosophy since Aristotle. Circa the end of the 19th century, the foundational crisis of mathematics implied developments of logic that are specific to mathematics. This allowed eventually the proof of theorems such as Gödel's theorems. Since then, mathematical logic is commonly considered as an area of mathematics.
- ^ This does not mean to make explicit all inference rules that are used. On the contrary, this is generally impossible, without computers and proof assistants. Even with this modern technology, it may take years of human work for writing down a completely detailed proof.
- ^ This does not mean that empirical evidence and intuition are not needed for choosing the theorems to be proved and to prove them.
- ^ This is the length of the original paper that does not contain the proofs of some previously published auxiliary results. The book devoted to the complete proof has more than 1,000 pages.
- ^ For considering as reliable a large computation occurring in a proof, one generally requires two computations using independent software
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ Hipólito, Inês Viegas (August 9–15, 2015). "Abstract Cognition and the Nature of Mathematical Proof". In Kanzian, Christian; Mitterer, Josef; Neges, Katharina (eds.). Realismus – Relativismus – Konstruktivismus: Beiträge des 38. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums [Realism – Relativism – Constructivism: Contributions of the 38th International Wittgenstein Symposium] (PDF) (in German and English). Vol. 23. Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. pp. 132–134. ISSN 1022-3398. OCLC 236026294. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 7, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2024. (at ResearchGate
Archived November 5, 2022, at the Wayback Machine)
- ^ Peterson 1988, p. 12.
- ^ a b Wigner, Eugene (1960). "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences". Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 13 (1): 1–14. Bibcode:1960CPAM...13....1W. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160130102. S2CID 6112252. Archived from the original on February 28, 2011.
- ^ Wise, David. "Eudoxus' Influence on Euclid's Elements with a close look at The Method of Exhaustion". The University of Georgia. Archived from the original on June 1, 2019. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
- ^ Alexander, Amir (September 2011). "The Skeleton in the Closet: Should Historians of Science Care about the History of Mathematics?". Isis. 102 (3): 475–480. doi:10.1086/661620. ISSN 0021-1753. MR 2884913. PMID 22073771. S2CID 21629993.
- ^ a b c d e f Kleiner, Israel (December 1991). "Rigor and Proof in Mathematics: A Historical Perspective". Mathematics Magazine. 64 (5). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: 291–314. doi:10.1080/0025570X.1991.11977625. eISSN 1930-0980. ISSN 0025-570X. JSTOR 2690647. LCCN 47003192. MR 1141557. OCLC 1756877. S2CID 7787171.
- ^ Bell, E. T. (1945) [1940]. "General Prospectus". The Development of Mathematics (2nd ed.). Dover Publications. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-486-27239-9. LCCN 45010599. OCLC 523284.
... mathematics has come down to the present by the two main streams of number and form. The first carried along arithmetic and algebra, the second, geometry.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Tiwari, Sarju (1992). "A Mirror of Civilization". Mathematics in History, Culture, Philosophy, and Science (1st ed.). New Delhi, India: Mittal Publications. p. 27. ISBN 978-81-7099-404-6. LCCN 92909575. OCLC 28115124.
It is unfortunate that two curses of mathematics--Numerology and Astrology were also born with it and have been more acceptable to the masses than mathematics itself.
- ^ Restivo, Sal (1992). "Mathematics from the Ground Up". In Bunge, Mario (ed.). Mathematics in Society and History. Episteme. Vol. 20. Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 14. ISBN 0-7923-1765-3. LCCN 25709270. OCLC 92013695.
- ^ Musielak, Dora (2022). Leonhard Euler and the Foundations of Celestial Mechanics. History of Physics. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12322-1. eISSN 2730-7557. ISBN 978-3-031-12321-4. ISSN 2730-7549. OCLC 1332780664. S2CID 253240718.
- ^ Biggs, N. L. (May 1979). "The roots of combinatorics". Historia Mathematica. 6 (2): 109–136. doi:10.1016/0315-0860(79)90074-0. eISSN 1090-249X. ISSN 0315-0860. LCCN 75642280. OCLC 2240703.
- ^ a b Warner, Evan. "Splash Talk: The Foundational Crisis of Mathematics" (PDF). Columbia University. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 22, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
- ^ Dunne, Edward; Hulek, Klaus (March 2020). "Mathematics Subject Classification 2020" (PDF). Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 67 (3): 410–411. doi:10.1090/noti2052. eISSN 1088-9477. ISSN 0002-9920. LCCN sf77000404. OCLC 1480366. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 3, 2021. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
The new MSC contains 63 two-digit classifications, 529 three-digit classifications, and 6,006 five-digit classifications.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "MSC2020-Mathematics Subject Classification System" (PDF). zbMath. Associate Editors of Mathematical Reviews and zbMATH. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
- ^ LeVeque, William J. (1977). "Introduction". Fundamentals of Number Theory. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. pp. 1–30. ISBN 0-201-04287-8. LCCN 76055645. OCLC 3519779. S2CID 118560854.
- ^ Goldman, Jay R. (1998). "The Founding Fathers". The Queen of Mathematics: A Historically Motivated Guide to Number Theory. Wellesley, MA: A K Peters. pp. 2–3. doi:10.1201/9781439864623. ISBN 1-56881-006-7. LCCN 94020017. OCLC 30437959. S2CID 118934517.
- ^ Weil, André (1983). Number Theory: An Approach Through History From Hammurapi to Legendre. Birkhäuser Boston. pp. 2–3. doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-4571-7. ISBN 0-8176-3141-0. LCCN 83011857. OCLC 9576587. S2CID 117789303.
- ^ Kleiner, Israel (March 2000). "From Fermat to Wiles: Fermat's Last Theorem Becomes a Theorem". Elemente der Mathematik. 55 (1): 19–37. doi:10.1007/PL00000079. eISSN 1420-8962. ISSN 0013-6018. LCCN 66083524. OCLC 1567783. S2CID 53319514.
- ^ Wang, Yuan (2002). The Goldbach Conjecture. Series in Pure Mathematics. Vol. 4 (2nd ed.). World Scientific. pp. 1–18. doi:10.1142/5096. ISBN 981-238-159-7. LCCN 2003268597. OCLC 51533750. S2CID 14555830.
- ^ a b c Straume, Eldar (September 4, 2014). "A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870". arXiv:1409.1140 [math.HO].
- ^ Hilbert, David (1902). The Foundations of Geometry. Open Court Publishing Company. p. 1. doi:10.1126/science.16.399.307. LCCN 02019303. OCLC 996838. S2CID 238499430. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
- ^ Hartshorne, Robin (2000). "Euclid's Geometry". Geometry: Euclid and Beyond. Springer New York. pp. 9–13. ISBN 0-387-98650-2. LCCN 99044789. OCLC 42290188. Retrieved February 7, 2024.
- ^ Boyer, Carl B. (2004) [1956]. "Fermat and Descartes". History of Analytic Geometry. Dover Publications. pp. 74–102. ISBN 0-486-43832-5. LCCN 2004056235. OCLC 56317813.
- ^ Stump, David J. (1997). "Reconstructing the Unity of Mathematics circa 1900" (PDF). Perspectives on Science. 5 (3): 383–417. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00532. eISSN 1530-9274. ISSN 1063-6145. LCCN 94657506. OCLC 26085129. S2CID 117709681. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 8, 2024. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. (February 1996). "Non-Euclidean geometry". MacTuror. Scotland, UK: University of St. Andrews. Archived from the original on November 6, 2022. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ Joyner, David (2008). "The (legal) Rubik's Cube group". Adventures in Group Theory: Rubik's Cube, Merlin's Machine, and Other Mathematical Toys (2nd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 219–232. ISBN 978-0-8018-9012-3. LCCN 2008011322. OCLC 213765703.
- ^ Christianidis, Jean; Oaks, Jeffrey (May 2013). "Practicing algebra in late antiquity: The problem-solving of Diophantus of Alexandria". Historia Mathematica. 40 (2): 127–163. doi:10.1016/j.hm.2012.09.001. eISSN 1090-249X. ISSN 0315-0860. LCCN 75642280. OCLC 2240703. S2CID 121346342.
- ^ Kleiner 2007, "History of Classical Algebra" pp. 3–5.
- ^ Shane, David (2022). "Figurate Numbers: A Historical Survey of an Ancient Mathematics" (PDF). Methodist University. p. 20. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 13, 2024.
In his work, Diophantus focused on deducing the arithmetic properties of figurate numbers, such as deducing the number of sides, the different ways a number can be expressed as a figurate number, and the formulation of the arithmetic progressions.
- ^ Overbay, Shawn; Schorer, Jimmy; Conger, Heather. "Al-Khwarizmi". University of Kentucky. Archived from the original on June 29, 2024. Retrieved June 13, 2024.
- ^ Lim, Lisa (December 21, 2018). "Where the x we use in algebra came from, and the X in Xmas". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on December 22, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ Berntjes, Sonja. "Algebra". Encyclopaedia of Islam Online (3rd ed.). ISSN 1573-3912. LCCN 2007238847. OCLC 56713464. Archived from the original on January 12, 2025. Retrieved June 13, 2024.
- ^ Oaks, Jeffery A. (2018). "François Viète's revolution in algebra" (PDF). Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 72 (3): 245–302. doi:10.1007/s00407-018-0208-0. eISSN 1432-0657. ISSN 0003-9519. LCCN 63024699. OCLC 1482042. S2CID 125704699. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 8, 2022. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ "Variable in Maths". GeeksforGeeks. April 24, 2024. Archived from the original on June 1, 2024. Retrieved June 13, 2024.
- ^ Kleiner 2007, "History of Linear Algebra" pp. 79–101.
- ^ Corry, Leo (2004). "Emmy Noether: Ideals and Structures". Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures (2nd revised ed.). Germany: Birkhäuser Basel. pp. 247–252. ISBN 3-7643-7002-5. LCCN 2004556211. OCLC 51234417. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ Riche, Jacques (2007). "From Universal Algebra to Universal Logic". In Beziau, J. Y.; Costa-Leite, Alexandre (eds.). Perspectives on Universal Logic. Milano, Italy: Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher. pp. 3–39. ISBN 978-88-7699-077-9. OCLC 647049731. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ Krömer, Ralph (2007). Tool and Object: A History and Philosophy of Category Theory. Science Networks – Historical Studies. Vol. 32. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. pp. xxi–xxv, 1–91. ISBN 978-3-7643-7523-2. LCCN 2007920230. OCLC 85242858. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- ^ Guicciardini, Niccolo (2017). "The Newton–Leibniz Calculus Controversy, 1708–1730" (PDF). In Schliesser, Eric; Smeenk, Chris (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Newton. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199930418.013.9. ISBN 978-0-19-993041-8. OCLC 975829354. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 9, 2022. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
- ^ O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. (September 1998). "Leonhard Euler". MacTutor. Scotland, UK: University of St Andrews. Archived from the original on November 9, 2022. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
- ^ "Calculus (Differential and Integral Calculus with Examples)". Byju's. Retrieved June 13, 2024.
- ^ Franklin, James (July 2017). "Discrete and Continuous: A Fundamental Dichotomy in Mathematics". Journal of Humanistic Mathematics. 7 (2): 355–378. doi:10.5642/jhummath.201702.18. hdl:1959.4/unsworks_53212. ISSN 2159-8118. LCCN 2011202231. OCLC 700943261. S2CID 6945363. Archived from the original on March 10, 2024. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
- ^ Maurer, Stephen B. (1997). "What is Discrete Mathematics? The Many Answers". In Rosenstein, Joseph G.; Franzblau, Deborah S.; Roberts, Fred S. (eds.). Discrete Mathematics in the Schools. DIMACS: Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. Vol. 36. American Mathematical Society. pp. 121–124. doi:10.1090/dimacs/036/13. ISBN 0-8218-0448-0. ISSN 1052-1798. LCCN 97023277. OCLC 37141146. S2CID 67358543. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
- ^ Hales, Thomas C. (2014). "Turing's Legacy: Developments from Turing's Ideas in Logic". In Downey, Rod (ed.). Turing's Legacy. Lecture Notes in Logic. Vol. 42. Cambridge University Press. pp. 260–261. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107338579.001. ISBN 978-1-107-04348-0. LCCN 2014000240. OCLC 867717052. S2CID 19315498. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
- ^ Sipser, Michael (July 1992). The History and Status of the P versus NP Question. STOC '92: Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing. pp. 603–618. doi:10.1145/129712.129771. S2CID 11678884.
- ^ Ewald, William (November 17, 2018). "The Emergence of First-Order Logic". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 1095-5054. LCCN sn97004494. OCLC 37550526. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
- ^ Ferreirós, José (June 18, 2020) [First published April 10, 2007]. "The Early Development of Set Theory". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 1095-5054. LCCN sn97004494. OCLC 37550526. Archived from the original on May 12, 2021. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
- ^ Ferreirós, José (December 2001). "The Road to Modern Logic—An Interpretation" (PDF). The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic. 7 (4): 441–484. doi:10.2307/2687794. eISSN 1943-5894. hdl:11441/38373. ISSN 1079-8986. JSTOR 2687794. LCCN 95652899. OCLC 31616719. S2CID 43258676. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 2, 2023. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
- ^ Wolchover, Natalie, ed. (November 26, 2013). "Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
- ^ Zhuang, Chaohui. "Wittgenstein's analysis on Cantor's diagonal argument" (DOC). PhilArchive. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
- ^ Tanswell, Fenner Stanley (2024). Mathematical Rigour and Informal Proof. Cambridge Elements in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009325110. eISSN 2399-2883. ISBN 978-1-00-949438-0. ISSN 2514-3808. OCLC 1418750041.
- ^ Avigad, Jeremy; Reck, Erich H. (December 11, 2001). ""Clarifying the nature of the infinite": the development of metamathematics and proof theory" (PDF). Carnegie Mellon University. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
- ^ Hamilton, Alan G. (1982). Numbers, Sets and Axioms: The Apparatus of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–4. ISBN 978-0-521-28761-6. Retrieved November 12, 2022.
- ^ Snapper, Ernst (September 1979). "The Three Crises in Mathematics: Logicism, Intuitionism, and Formalism". Mathematics Magazine. 52 (4): 207–216. doi:10.2307/2689412. ISSN 0025-570X. JSTOR 2689412.
- ^ a b Raatikainen, Panu (October 2005). "On the Philosophical Relevance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems". Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 59 (4): 513–534. doi:10.3917/rip.234.0513. JSTOR 23955909. S2CID 52083793. Archived from the original on November 12, 2022. Retrieved November 12, 2022.
- ^ Moschovakis, Joan (September 4, 2018). "Intuitionistic Logic". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on December 16, 2022. Retrieved November 12, 2022.
- ^ McCarty, Charles (2006). "At the Heart of Analysis: Intuitionism and Philosophy". Philosophia Scientiæ, Cahier spécial 6: 81–94. doi:10.4000/philosophiascientiae.411.
- ^ Halpern, Joseph; Harper, Robert; Immerman, Neil; Kolaitis, Phokion; Vardi, Moshe; Vianu, Victor (2001). "On the Unusual Effectiveness of Logic in Computer Science" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 3, 2021. Retrieved January 15, 2021.
- ^ Rouaud, Mathieu (April 2017) [First published July 2013]. Probability, Statistics and Estimation (PDF). p. 10. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved February 13, 2024.
- ^ Rao, C. Radhakrishna (1997) [1989]. Statistics and Truth: Putting Chance to Work (2nd ed.). World Scientific. pp. 3–17, 63–70. ISBN 981-02-3111-3. LCCN 97010349. MR 1474730. OCLC 36597731.
- ^ Rao, C. Radhakrishna (1981). "Foreword". In Arthanari, T.S.; Dodge, Yadolah (eds.). Mathematical programming in statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley. pp. vii–viii. ISBN 978-0-471-08073-2. LCCN 80021637. MR 0607328. OCLC 6707805.
- ^ Whittle 1994, pp. 10–11, 14–18.
- ^ Marchuk, Gurii Ivanovich (April 2020). "G I Marchuk's plenary: ICM 1970". MacTutor. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland. Archived from the original on November 13, 2022. Retrieved November 13, 2022.
- ^ Johnson, Gary M.; Cavallini, John S. (September 1991). Phua, Kang Hoh; Loe, Kia Fock (eds.). Grand Challenges, High Performance Computing, and Computational Science. Singapore Supercomputing Conference'90: Supercomputing For Strategic Advantage. World Scientific. p. 28. LCCN 91018998. Retrieved November 13, 2022.
- ^ Trefethen, Lloyd N. (2008). "Numerical Analysis". In Gowers, Timothy; Barrow-Green, June; Leader, Imre (eds.). The Princeton Companion to Mathematics (PDF). Princeton University Press. pp. 604–615. ISBN 978-0-691-11880-2. LCCN 2008020450. MR 2467561. OCLC 227205932. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 7, 2023. Retrieved February 15, 2024.
- ^
- Cresswell 2021, § Mathematics
- Perisho 1965, p. 64
- ^ Perisho, Margaret W. (Spring 1965). "The Etymology of Mathematical Terms". Pi Mu Epsilon Journal. 4 (2): 62–66. ISSN 0031-952X. JSTOR 24338341. LCCN 58015848. OCLC 1762376.
- ^ Boas, Ralph P. (1995). "What Augustine Didn't Say About Mathematicians". In Alexanderson, Gerald L.; Mugler, Dale H. (eds.). Lion Hunting and Other Mathematical Pursuits: A Collection of Mathematics, Verse, and Stories. Mathematical Association of America. p. 257. ISBN 978-0-88385-323-8. LCCN 94078313. OCLC 633018890.
- ^ The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford English Dictionary, sub "mathematics", "mathematic", "mathematics".
- ^ "Maths (Noun)". Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ "Math (Noun³)". Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on April 4, 2020. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
- ^ See, for example, Wilder, Raymond L. Evolution of Mathematical Concepts; an Elementary Study. passim.
- ^ Zaslavsky, Claudia (1999). Africa Counts: Number and Pattern in African Culture. Chicago Review Press. ISBN 978-1-61374-115-3. OCLC 843204342.
- ^ Kline 1990, Chapter 1.
- ^ Mesopotamia[dead link] pg 10. Retrieved June 1, 2024
- ^ Boyer 1991, "Mesopotamia" pp. 24–27.
- ^ Heath, Thomas Little (1981) [1921]. A History of Greek Mathematics: From Thales to Euclid. New York: Dover Publications. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-486-24073-2.
- ^ Mueller, I. (1969). "Euclid's Elements and the Axiomatic Method". The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 20 (4): 289–309. doi:10.1093/bjps/20.4.289. ISSN 0007-0882. JSTOR 686258.
- ^ Boyer 1991, "Euclid of Alexandria" p. 119.
- ^ Boyer 1991, "Archimedes of Syracuse" p. 120.
- ^ Boyer 1991, "Archimedes of Syracuse" p. 130.
- ^ Boyer 1991, "Apollonius of Perga" p. 145.
- ^ Boyer 1991, "Greek Trigonometry and Mensuration" p. 162.
- ^ Boyer 1991, "Revival and Decline of Greek Mathematics" p. 180.
- ^ Ore, Øystein (1988). Number Theory and Its History. Courier Corporation. pp. 19–24. ISBN 978-0-486-65620-5. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
- ^ Singh, A. N. (January 1936). "On the Use of Series in Hindu Mathematics". Osiris. 1: 606–628. doi:10.1086/368443. JSTOR 301627. S2CID 144760421.
- ^ Kolachana, A.; Mahesh, K.; Ramasubramanian, K. (2019). "Use of series in India". Studies in Indian Mathematics and Astronomy. Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences. Singapore: Springer. pp. 438–461. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-7326-8_20. ISBN 978-981-13-7325-1. S2CID 190176726.
- ^ Saliba, George (1994). A history of Arabic astronomy: planetary theories during the golden age of Islam. New York University Press. ISBN 978-0-8147-7962-0. OCLC 28723059.
- ^ Faruqi, Yasmeen M. (2006). "Contributions of Islamic scholars to the scientific enterprise". International Education Journal. 7 (4). Shannon Research Press: 391–399. Archived from the original on November 14, 2022. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
- ^ Lorch, Richard (June 2001). "Greek-Arabic-Latin: The Transmission of Mathematical Texts in the Middle Ages" (PDF). Science in Context. 14 (1–2). Cambridge University Press: 313–331. doi:10.1017/S0269889701000114. S2CID 146539132. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 17, 2022. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
- ^ Kent, Benjamin (2022). History of Science (PDF). Vol. 2. Bibliotex Digital Library. ISBN 978-1-984668-67-7. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 16, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
- ^ Archibald, Raymond Clare (January 1949). "History of Mathematics After the Sixteenth Century". The American Mathematical Monthly. Part 2: Outline of the History of Mathematics. 56 (1): 35–56. doi:10.2307/2304570. JSTOR 2304570.
- ^ Sevryuk 2006, pp. 101–109.
- ^ Wolfram, Stephan (October 2000). Mathematical Notation: Past and Future. MathML and Math on the Web: MathML International Conference 2000, Urbana Champaign, USA. Archived from the original on November 16, 2022. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
- ^ Douglas, Heather; Headley, Marcia Gail; Hadden, Stephanie; LeFevre, Jo-Anne (December 3, 2020). "Knowledge of Mathematical Symbols Goes Beyond Numbers". Journal of Numerical Cognition. 6 (3): 322–354. doi:10.5964/jnc.v6i3.293. eISSN 2363-8761. S2CID 228085700.
- ^ Letourneau, Mary; Wright Sharp, Jennifer (October 2017). "AMS Style Guide" (PDF). American Mathematical Society. p. 75. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 8, 2022. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
- ^ Jansen, Anthony R.; Marriott, Kim; Yelland, Greg W. (2000). "Constituent Structure in Mathematical Expressions" (PDF). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 22. University of California Merced. eISSN 1069-7977. OCLC 68713073. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 16, 2022. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
- ^ Rossi, Richard J. (2006). Theorems, Corollaries, Lemmas, and Methods of Proof. Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Wiley Series of Texts, Monographs and Tracts. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 1–14, 47–48. ISBN 978-0-470-04295-3. LCCN 2006041609. OCLC 64085024.
- ^ "Earliest Uses of Some Words of Mathematics". MacTutor. Scotland, UK: University of St. Andrews. Archived from the original on September 29, 2022. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
- ^ Silver, Daniel S. (November–December 2017). "The New Language of Mathematics". The American Scientist. 105 (6). Sigma Xi: 364–371. doi:10.1511/2017.105.6.364. ISSN 0003-0996. LCCN 43020253. OCLC 1480717. S2CID 125455764.
- ^ Bellomo, Nicola; Preziosi, Luigi (December 22, 1994). Modelling Mathematical Methods and Scientific Computation. Mathematical Modeling. Vol. 1. CRC Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-8493-8331-1. Retrieved November 16, 2022.
- ^ Hennig, Christian (2010). "Mathematical Models and Reality: A Constructivist Perspective". Foundations of Science. 15: 29–48. doi:10.1007/s10699-009-9167-x. S2CID 6229200. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
- ^ Frigg, Roman; Hartmann, Stephan (February 4, 2020). "Models in Science". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on November 17, 2022. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
- ^ Stewart, Ian (2018). "Mathematics, Maps, and Models". In Wuppuluri, Shyam; Doria, Francisco Antonio (eds.). The Map and the Territory: Exploring the Foundations of Science, Thought and Reality. The Frontiers Collection. Springer. pp. 345–356. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72478-2_18. ISBN 978-3-319-72478-2. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
- ^ "The science checklist applied: Mathematics". Understanding Science. University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original on October 27, 2019. Retrieved October 27, 2019.
- ^ Mackay, A. L. (1991). Dictionary of Scientific Quotations. London: Taylor & Francis. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-7503-0106-0. Retrieved March 19, 2023.
- ^ Bishop, Alan (1991). "Environmental activities and mathematical culture". Mathematical Enculturation: A Cultural Perspective on Mathematics Education. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 20–59. ISBN 978-0-7923-1270-3. Retrieved April 5, 2020.
- ^ Shasha, Dennis Elliot; Lazere, Cathy A. (1998). Out of Their Minds: The Lives and Discoveries of 15 Great Computer Scientists. Springer. p. 228. ISBN 978-0-387-98269-4.
- ^ Nickles, Thomas (2013). "The Problem of Demarcation". Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-226-05182-6.
- ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (2014). "Are There 'Other' Ways of Knowing?". Philosophy Now. Archived from the original on May 13, 2020. Retrieved April 6, 2020.
- ^ a b Ferreirós, J. (2007). "Ό Θεὸς Άριθμητίζει: The Rise of Pure Mathematics as Arithmetic with Gauss". In Goldstein, Catherine; Schappacher, Norbert; Schwermer, Joachim (eds.). The Shaping of Arithmetic after C.F. Gauss's Disquisitiones Arithmeticae. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 235–268. ISBN 978-3-540-34720-0.
- ^ Kuhn, Thomas S. (1976). "Mathematical vs. Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science". The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. 7 (1). The MIT Press: 1–31. doi:10.2307/202372. JSTOR 202372.
- ^ Asper, Markus (2009). "The two cultures of mathematics in ancient Greece". In Robson, Eleanor; Stedall, Jacqueline (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. Oxford Handbooks in Mathematics. OUP Oxford. pp. 107–132. ISBN 978-0-19-921312-2. Retrieved November 18, 2022.
- ^ Gozwami, Pinkimani; Singh, Madan Mohan (2019). "Integer Factorization Problem". In Ahmad, Khaleel; Doja, M. N.; Udzir, Nur Izura; Singh, Manu Pratap (eds.). Emerging Security Algorithms and Techniques. CRC Press. pp. 59–60. ISBN 978-0-8153-6145-9. LCCN 2019010556. OCLC 1082226900.
- ^ Maddy, P. (2008). "How applied mathematics became pure" (PDF). The Review of Symbolic Logic. 1 (1): 16–41. doi:10.1017/S1755020308080027. S2CID 18122406. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 12, 2017. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
- ^ Silver, Daniel S. (2017). "In Defense of Pure Mathematics". In Pitici, Mircea (ed.). The Best Writing on Mathematics, 2016. Princeton University Press. pp. 17–26. ISBN 978-0-691-17529-4. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
- ^ Parshall, Karen Hunger (2022). "The American Mathematical Society and Applied Mathematics from the 1920s to the 1950s: A Revisionist Account". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 59 (3): 405–427. doi:10.1090/bull/1754. S2CID 249561106. Archived from the original on November 20, 2022. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
- ^ Stolz, Michael (2002). "The History Of Applied Mathematics And The History Of Society". Synthese. 133 (1–2): 43–57. doi:10.1023/A:1020823608217. S2CID 34271623. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
- ^ Lin, C. C . (March 1976). "On the role of applied mathematics". Advances in Mathematics. 19 (3): 267–288. doi:10.1016/0001-8708(76)90024-4.
- ^ Peressini, Anthony (September 1999). Applying Pure Mathematics (PDF). Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers. Vol. 66. pp. S1 – S13. JSTOR 188757. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved November 30, 2022.
- ^ Lützen, J. (2011). "Examples and reflections on the interplay between mathematics and physics in the 19th and 20th century". In Schlote, K. H.; Schneider, M. (eds.). Mathematics meets physics: A contribution to their interaction in the 19th and the first half of the 20th century. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Harri Deutsch. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
- ^ Marker, Dave (July 1996). "Model theory and exponentiation". Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 43 (7): 753–759. Archived from the original on March 13, 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
- ^ Chen, Changbo; Maza, Marc Moreno (August 2014). Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition in the RegularChains Library. International Congress on Mathematical Software 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8592. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44199-2_65. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
- ^ Pérez-Escobar, José Antonio; Sarikaya, Deniz (2021). "Purifying applied mathematics and applying pure mathematics: how a late Wittgensteinian perspective sheds light onto the dichotomy". European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 12 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00435-9. S2CID 245465895.
- ^ Takase, M. (2014). "Pure Mathematics and Applied Mathematics are Inseparably Intertwined: Observation of the Early Analysis of the Infinity". A Mathematical Approach to Research Problems of Science and Technology. Mathematics for Industry. Vol. 5. Tokyo: Springer. pp. 393–399. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55060-0_29. ISBN 978-4-431-55059-4. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
- ^ Sarukkai, Sundar (February 10, 2005). "Revisiting the 'unreasonable effectiveness' of mathematics". Current Science. 88 (3): 415–423. JSTOR 24110208.
- ^ Wagstaff, Samuel S. Jr. (2021). "History of Integer Factoring" (PDF). In Bos, Joppe W.; Stam, Martijn (eds.). Computational Cryptography, Algorithmic Aspects of Cryptography, A Tribute to AKL. London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series 469. Cambridge University Press. pp. 41–77. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 20, 2022. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
- ^ "Curves: Ellipse". MacTutor. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland. Archived from the original on October 14, 2022. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
- ^ Mukunth, Vasudevan (September 10, 2015). "Beyond the Surface of Einstein's Relativity Lay a Chimerical Geometry". The Wire. Archived from the original on November 20, 2022. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
- ^ Wilson, Edwin B.; Lewis, Gilbert N. (November 1912). "The Space-Time Manifold of Relativity. The Non-Euclidean Geometry of Mechanics and Electromagnetics". Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 48 (11): 389–507. doi:10.2307/20022840. JSTOR 20022840.
- ^ a b c Borel, Armand (1983). "Mathematics: Art and Science". The Mathematical Intelligencer. 5 (4). Springer: 9–17. doi:10.4171/news/103/8. ISSN 1027-488X.
- ^ Hanson, Norwood Russell (November 1961). "Discovering the Positron (I)". The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 12 (47). The University of Chicago Press: 194–214. doi:10.1093/bjps/xiii.49.54. JSTOR 685207.
- ^ Ginammi, Michele (February 2016). "Avoiding reification: Heuristic effectiveness of mathematics and the prediction of the Ω– particle". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 53: 20–27. Bibcode:2016SHPMP..53...20G. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.12.001.
- ^ Wagh, Sanjay Moreshwar; Deshpande, Dilip Abasaheb (September 27, 2012). Essentials of Physics. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 3. ISBN 978-81-203-4642-0. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
- ^ Atiyah, Michael (1990). On the Work of Edward Witten (PDF). Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. p. 31. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 28, 2013. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ "Course 18C Mathematics with Computer Science". math.mit.edu. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- ^ "Theoretical Computer Science". math.mit.edu. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- ^ "Real-Life Applications of Discrete Mathematics". GeeksforGeeks. April 8, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ Hales, Thomas; Adams, Mark; Bauer, Gertrud; Dang, Tat Dat; Harrison, John; Hoang, Le Truong; Kaliszyk, Cezary; Magron, Victor; Mclaughlin, Sean; Nguyen, Tat Thang; Nguyen, Quang Truong; Nipkow, Tobias; Obua, Steven; Pleso, Joseph; Rute, Jason; Solovyev, Alexey; Ta, Thi Hoai An; Tran, Nam Trung; Trieu, Thi Diep; Urban, Josef; Vu, Ky; Zumkeller, Roland (2017). "A Formal Proof of the Kepler Conjecture". Forum of Mathematics, Pi. 5 e2. doi:10.1017/fmp.2017.1. hdl:2066/176365. ISSN 2050-5086. S2CID 216912822. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved February 25, 2023.
- ^ a b c Millstein, Roberta (September 8, 2016). "Probability in Biology: The Case of Fitness" (PDF). In Hájek, Alan; Hitchcock, Christopher (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. pp. 601–622. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199607617.013.27. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 7, 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ See for example Anne Laurent, Roland Gamet, Jérôme Pantel, Tendances nouvelles en modélisation pour l'environnement, actes du congrès «Programme environnement, vie et sociétés» 15–17 janvier 1996, CNRS
- ^ Bouleau 1999, pp. 282–283.
- ^ Bouleau 1999, p. 285.
- ^ "1.4: The Lotka-Volterra Predator-Prey Model". Mathematics LibreTexts. January 5, 2022. Archived from the original on December 29, 2022. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ Salsburg, David (August 17, 1992). "Commentary" (PDF). The Use of Statistical Methods in the Analysis of Clinical Studies. 46: 17. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 1, 2024. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- ^ National Research Council (2003). "8". Beyond the Molecular Frontier: Challenges for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering. NAP.edu. pp. 71–73. doi:10.17226/10633. ISBN 978-0-309-16839-7. PMID 25032300.
- ^ "Catastrophe Models (Property)". content.naic.org. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ "MAM2001 Essay". ww2.amstat.org. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ Hill, Mullica (September 7, 2022). "HOW MATH IS USED IN WEATHER FORECASTING". mathnasium.com. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ "Using Mathematical Models to Investigate Planetary Habitability" (PDF). NASA. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 19, 2024.
- ^ Edling, Christofer R. (2002). "Mathematics in Sociology". Annual Review of Sociology. 28 (1): 197–220. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140942. ISSN 0360-0572. Archived from the original on November 15, 2021. Retrieved September 30, 2023.
- ^ Batchelder, William H. (January 1, 2015). "Mathematical Psychology: History". In Wright, James D. (ed.). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 808–815. ISBN 978-0-08-097087-5. Archived from the original on February 17, 2023. Retrieved September 30, 2023.
- ^ a b Zak, Paul J. (2010). Moral Markets: The Critical Role of Values in the Economy. Princeton University Press. p. 158. ISBN 978-1-4008-3736-6. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
- ^ Levin, Jonathan; Milgrom, Paul (September 2004). Introduction to Choice Theory (PDF).
- ^ Kremer, Michael; Rao, Gautam; Schilbach, Frank (2019). "Chapter 5 Behavioral development economics". Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations (PDF). Vol. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2024. Retrieved June 2, 2024.
- ^ "Mathematics". mdpi.com.
- ^ "Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Archived from the original on July 1, 2016. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ "Mathématique de l'histoire-géometrie et cinématique. Lois de Brück. Chronologie géodésique de la Bible., by Charles LAGRANGE et al. | The Online Books Page". onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
- ^ "Cliodynamics: a science for predicting the future". ZDNet. Archived from the original on December 29, 2022. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ Sokal, Alan; Jean Bricmont (1998). Fashionable Nonsense. New York: Picador. ISBN 978-0-312-19545-8. OCLC 39605994.
- ^ "Biden's Misleading Unemployment Statistic – FactCheck.org". January 27, 2023. Archived from the original on June 2, 2024. Retrieved June 2, 2024.
- ^ "Modern Macroeconomic Models as Tools for Economic Policy | Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis". minneapolisfed.org. Archived from the original on August 3, 2024. Retrieved June 2, 2024.
- ^ Balaguer, Mark (2016). "Platonism in Metaphysics". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on January 30, 2022. Retrieved April 2, 2022.
- ^ See White, L. (1947). "The locus of mathematical reality: An anthropological footnote". Philosophy of Science. 14 (4): 289–303. doi:10.1086/286957. S2CID 119887253. 189303; also in Newman, J. R. (1956). The World of Mathematics. Vol. 4. New York: Simon and Schuster. pp. 2348–2364.
- ^ Dorato, Mauro (2005). "Why are laws mathematical?" (PDF). The Software of the Universe, An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Laws of Nature. Ashgate. pp. 31–66. ISBN 978-0-7546-3994-7. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
- ^ Mura, Roberta (December 1993). "Images of Mathematics Held by University Teachers of Mathematical Sciences". Educational Studies in Mathematics. 25 (4): 375–85. doi:10.1007/BF01273907. JSTOR 3482762. S2CID 122351146.
- ^ Tobies, Renate; Neunzert, Helmut (2012). Iris Runge: A Life at the Crossroads of Mathematics, Science, and Industry. Springer. p. 9. ISBN 978-3-0348-0229-1. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
[I]t is first necessary to ask what is meant by mathematics in general. Illustrious scholars have debated this matter until they were blue in the face, and yet no consensus has been reached about whether mathematics is a natural science, a branch of the humanities, or an art form.
- ^ Ziegler, Günter M.; Loos, Andreas (November 2, 2017). Kaiser, G. (ed.). "What is Mathematics?" and why we should ask, where one should experience and learn that, and how to teach it. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer. pp. 63–77. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_5. ISBN 978-3-319-62596-6. (Sections "What is Mathematics?" and "What is Mathematics, Really?")
- ^ Mura 1993, pp. 379, 381.
- ^ Brown & Porter 1995, p. 326.
- ^ Strauss, Danie (2011). "Defining mathematics". Acta Academica. 43 (4): 1–28. Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ Franklin, James (2009). Philosophy of Mathematics. Elsevier. pp. 104–106. ISBN 978-0-08-093058-9. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
- ^ Cajori, Florian (1893). A History of Mathematics. American Mathematical Society (1991 reprint). pp. 285–286. ISBN 978-0-8218-2102-2. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Devlin 2018, p. 3.
- ^ Saunders Maclane (1986). Mathematics, form and function. Springer., page 409
- ^ Brown, Ronald; Porter, Timothy (1995). "The Methodology of Mathematics". The Mathematical Gazette. 79 (485): 321–334. doi:10.2307/3618304. JSTOR 3618304. S2CID 178923299. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ Hamami, Yacin (June 2022). "Mathematical Rigor and Proof" (PDF). The Review of Symbolic Logic. 15 (2): 409–449. doi:10.1017/S1755020319000443. S2CID 209980693. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 5, 2022. Retrieved November 21, 2022.
- ^ Peterson 1988, p. 4: "A few complain that the computer program can't be verified properly." (in reference to the Haken–Appel proof of the Four Color Theorem)
- ^ Perminov, V. Ya. (1988). "On the Reliability of Mathematical Proofs". Philosophy of Mathematics. 42 (167 (4)). Revue Internationale de Philosophie: 500–508.
- ^ Davis, Jon D.; McDuffie, Amy Roth; Drake, Corey; Seiwell, Amanda L. (2019). "Teachers' perceptions of the official curriculum: Problem solving and rigor". International Journal of Educational Research. 93: 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2018.10.002. S2CID 149753721.
- ^ Endsley, Kezia (2021). Mathematicians and Statisticians: A Practical Career Guide. Practical Career Guides. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-1-5381-4517-3. Retrieved November 29, 2022.
- ^ Robson, Eleanor (2009). "Mathematics education in an Old Babylonian scribal school". In Robson, Eleanor; Stedall, Jacqueline (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-921312-2. Retrieved November 24, 2022.
- ^ Bernard, Alain; Proust, Christine; Ross, Micah (2014). "Mathematics Education in Antiquity". In Karp, A.; Schubring, G. (eds.). Handbook on the History of Mathematics Education. New York: Springer. pp. 27–53. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9155-2_3. ISBN 978-1-4614-9154-5.
- ^ Dudley, Underwood (April 2002). "The World's First Mathematics Textbook". Math Horizons. 9 (4). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: 8–11. doi:10.1080/10724117.2002.11975154. JSTOR 25678363. S2CID 126067145.
- ^ Subramarian, F. Indian pedagogy and problem solving in ancient Thamizhakam (PDF). History and Pedagogy of Mathematics conference, July 16–20, 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 28, 2022. Retrieved November 29, 2022.
- ^ Siu, Man Keung (2004). "Official Curriculum in Mathematics in Ancient China: How did Candidates Study for the Examination?". How Chinese Learn Mathematics (PDF). Series on Mathematics Education. Vol. 1. pp. 157–185. doi:10.1142/9789812562241_0006. ISBN 978-981-256-014-8. Retrieved November 26, 2022.
- ^ Jones, Phillip S. (1967). "The History of Mathematical Education". The American Mathematical Monthly. 74 (1). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: 38–55. doi:10.2307/2314867. JSTOR 2314867.
- ^ Schubring, Gert; Furinghetti, Fulvia; Siu, Man Keung (August 2012). "Introduction: the history of mathematics teaching. Indicators for modernization processes in societies". ZDM Mathematics Education. 44 (4): 457–459. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0445-7. S2CID 145507519.
- ^ von Davier, Matthias; Foy, Pierre; Martin, Michael O.; Mullis, Ina V.S. (2020). "Examining eTIMSS Country Differences Between eTIMSS Data and Bridge Data: A Look at Country-Level Mode of Administration Effects". TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science (PDF). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education and Human Development and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. p. 13.1. ISBN 978-1-889938-54-7. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 29, 2022. Retrieved November 29, 2022.
- ^ Rowan-Kenyon, Heather T.; Swan, Amy K.; Creager, Marie F. (March 2012). "Social Cognitive Factors, Support, and Engagement: Early Adolescents' Math Interests as Precursors to Choice of Career" (PDF). The Career Development Quarterly. 60 (1): 2–15. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00001.x. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved November 29, 2022.
- ^ Luttenberger, Silke; Wimmer, Sigrid; Paechter, Manuela (2018). "Spotlight on math anxiety". Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 11: 311–322. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S141421. PMC 6087017. PMID 30123014.
- ^ Yaftian, Narges (June 2, 2015). "The Outlook of the Mathematicians' Creative Processes". Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 191: 2519–2525. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.617.
- ^ Nadjafikhah, Mehdi; Yaftian, Narges (October 10, 2013). "The Frontage of Creativity and Mathematical Creativity". Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 90: 344–350. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.101.
- ^ van der Poorten, A. (1979). "A proof that Euler missed... Apéry's Proof of the irrationality of ζ(3)" (PDF). The Mathematical Intelligencer. 1 (4): 195–203. doi:10.1007/BF03028234. S2CID 121589323. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved November 22, 2022.
- ^ Petkovi, Miodrag (September 2, 2009). Famous Puzzles of Great Mathematicians. American Mathematical Society. pp. xiii–xiv. ISBN 978-0-8218-4814-2. Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ Hardy, G. H. (1940). A Mathematician's Apology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-42706-7. Retrieved November 22, 2022.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) See also A Mathematician's Apology. - ^ Alon, Noga; Goldston, Dan; Sárközy, András; Szabados, József; Tenenbaum, Gérald; Garcia, Stephan Ramon; Shoemaker, Amy L. (March 2015). Alladi, Krishnaswami; Krantz, Steven G. (eds.). "Reflections on Paul Erdős on His Birth Centenary, Part II". Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 62 (3): 226–247. doi:10.1090/noti1223.
- ^ See, for example Bertrand Russell's statement "Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty ..." in his History of Western Philosophy. 1919. p. 60.
- ^ Cazden, Norman (October 1959). "Musical intervals and simple number ratios". Journal of Research in Music Education. 7 (2): 197–220. doi:10.1177/002242945900700205. JSTOR 3344215. S2CID 220636812.
- ^ Budden, F. J. (October 1967). "Modern mathematics and music". The Mathematical Gazette. 51 (377). Cambridge University Press ({CUP}): 204–215. doi:10.2307/3613237. JSTOR 3613237. S2CID 126119711.
- ^ Enquist, Magnus; Arak, Anthony (November 1994). "Symmetry, beauty and evolution". Nature. 372 (6502): 169–172. Bibcode:1994Natur.372..169E. doi:10.1038/372169a0. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 7969448. S2CID 4310147. Archived from the original on December 28, 2022. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ Hestenes, David (1999). "Symmetry Groups" (PDF).
- ^ Bender, Sara (September 2020). "The Rorschach Test". In Carducci, Bernardo J.; Nave, Christopher S.; Mio, Jeffrey S.; Riggio, Ronald E. (eds.). The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Measurement and Assessment. Wiley. pp. 367–376. doi:10.1002/9781119547167.ch131. ISBN 978-1-119-05751-2.
- ^ Weyl, Hermann (2015). Symmetry. Princeton Science Library. Vol. 47. Princeton University Press. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-4008-7434-7.
- ^ "Lecture 8: Translation Symmetry | Physics III: Vibrations and Waves | Physics". MIT OpenCourseWare.
- ^ Bradley, Larry (2010). "Fractals – Chaos & Fractals". stsci.edu. Archived from the original on March 7, 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ "Self-similarity". math.bu.edu. Archived from the original on March 2, 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ Kissane, Barry (July 2009). Popular mathematics. 22nd Biennial Conference of The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. Fremantle, Western Australia: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. pp. 125–126. Archived from the original on March 7, 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2022.
- ^ Steen, L. A. (2012). Mathematics Today Twelve Informal Essays. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-4613-9435-8. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
- ^ Pitici, Mircea (2017). The Best Writing on Mathematics 2016. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-8560-2. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
- ^ Monastyrsky 2001, p. 1: "The Fields Medal is now indisputably the best known and most influential award in mathematics."
- ^ Riehm 2002, pp. 778–782.
- ^ "Fields Medal | International Mathematical Union (IMU)". www.mathunion.org. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
- ^ a b "Fields Medal". Maths History. Archived from the original on March 22, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
- ^ "Honours/Prizes Index". MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive. Archived from the original on December 17, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2023.
- ^ "About the Abel Prize". The Abel Prize. Archived from the original on April 14, 2022. Retrieved January 23, 2022.
- ^ "Abel Prize | mathematics award". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on January 26, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2022.
- ^ "Chern Medal Award" (PDF). mathunion.org. June 1, 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
- ^ "Chern Medal Award". International Mathematical Union (IMU). Archived from the original on August 25, 2010. Retrieved January 23, 2022.
- ^ "The Leroy P Steele Prize of the AMS". School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland. Archived from the original on November 17, 2022. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
- ^ Chern, S. S.; Hirzebruch, F. (September 2000). Wolf Prize in Mathematics. doi:10.1142/4149. ISBN 978-981-02-3945-9. Archived from the original on February 21, 2022. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
- ^ "The Wolf Prize". Wolf Foundation. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2022.
- ^ a b "Hilbert's Problems: 23 and Math". Simons Foundation. May 6, 2020. Archived from the original on January 23, 2022. Retrieved January 23, 2022.
- ^ Feferman, Solomon (1998). "Deciding the undecidable: Wrestling with Hilbert's problems" (PDF). In the Light of Logic. Logic and Computation in Philosophy series. Oxford University Press. pp. 3–27. ISBN 978-0-19-508030-8. Retrieved November 29, 2022.
- ^ "The Millennium Prize Problems". Clay Mathematics Institute. Archived from the original on July 3, 2015. Retrieved January 23, 2022.
- ^ "Millennium Problems". Clay Mathematics Institute. Archived from the original on December 20, 2018. Retrieved January 23, 2022.
Other sources
[edit]- Bouleau, Nicolas (1999). Philosophie des mathématiques et de la modélisation: Du chercheur à l'ingénieur. L'Harmattan. ISBN 978-2-7384-8125-2.
- Boyer, Carl Benjamin (1991). A History of Mathematics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-54397-8.
- Cresswell, Julia (2021). Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins (3 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-886875-0.
- Devlin, Keith (2018). Sets, Functions, and Logic: An Introduction to Abstract Mathematics (3 ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4822-8602-1. Archived from the original on October 7, 2024. Retrieved October 4, 2024.
- Eves, Howard (1990). An Introduction to the History of Mathematics (6th ed.). Saunders. ISBN 978-0-03-029558-4.
- Kleiner, Israel (2007). Kleiner, Israel (ed.). A History of Abstract Algebra. Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-4685-1. ISBN 978-0-8176-4684-4. LCCN 2007932362. OCLC 76935733. S2CID 117392219. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- Kline, Morris (1990). Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-506135-2.
- Monastyrsky, Michael (2001). "Some Trends in Modern Mathematics and the Fields Medal" (PDF). CMS – Notes – de la SMC. 33 (2–3). Canadian Mathematical Society. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 13, 2006. Retrieved July 28, 2006.
- Peirce, Benjamin (1881). Peirce, Charles Sanders (ed.). "Linear associative algebra". American Journal of Mathematics. 4 (1–4) (Corrected, expanded, and annotated revision with an 1875 paper by B. Peirce and annotations by his son, C.S. Peirce, of the 1872 lithograph ed.): 97–229. doi:10.2307/2369153. hdl:2027/hvd.32044030622997. JSTOR 2369153. Corrected, expanded, and annotated revision with an 1875 paper by B. Peirce and annotations by his son, C. S. Peirce, of the 1872 lithograph ed. Google Eprint and as an extract, D. Van Nostrand, 1882, Google Eprint. Retrieved November 17, 2020..
- Peterson, Ivars (1988). The Mathematical Tourist: Snapshots of Modern Mathematics. W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN 0-7167-1953-3. LCCN 87033078. OCLC 17202382.
- Popper, Karl R. (1995). "On knowledge". In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years. New York: Routledge. Bibcode:1992sbwl.book.....P. ISBN 978-0-415-13548-1.
- Riehm, Carl (August 2002). "The Early History of the Fields Medal" (PDF). Notices of the AMS. 49 (7): 778–782. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 26, 2006. Retrieved October 2, 2006.
- Sevryuk, Mikhail B. (January 2006). "Book Reviews" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 43 (1): 101–109. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-05-01069-4. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 23, 2006. Retrieved June 24, 2006.
- Whittle, Peter (1994). "Almost home". In Kelly, F.P. (ed.). Probability, statistics and optimisation: A Tribute to Peter Whittle (previously "A realised path: The Cambridge Statistical Laboratory up to 1993 (revised 2002)" ed.). Chichester: John Wiley. pp. 1–28. ISBN 978-0-471-94829-2. Archived from the original on December 19, 2013.
Further reading
[edit]- Benson, Donald C. (1999). The Moment of Proof: Mathematical Epiphanies. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-513919-8.
- Davis, Philip J.; Hersh, Reuben (1999). The Mathematical Experience (Reprint ed.). Boston; New York: Mariner Books. ISBN 978-0-395-92968-1. Available online (registration required).
- Courant, Richard; Robbins, Herbert (1996). What Is Mathematics?: An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-510519-3.
- Gullberg, Jan (1997). Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-04002-9.
- Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2000). Encyclopaedia of Mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. – A translated and expanded version of a Soviet mathematics encyclopedia, in ten volumes. Also in paperback and on CD-ROM, and online. Archived December 20, 2012, at archive.today.
- Hodgkin, Luke Howard (2005). A History of Mathematics: From Mesopotamia to Modernity. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-152383-0.
- Jourdain, Philip E. B. (2003). "The Nature of Mathematics". In James R. Newman (ed.). The World of Mathematics. Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-43268-7.
- Pappas, Theoni (1986). The Joy Of Mathematics. San Carlos, California: Wide World Publishing. ISBN 978-0-933174-65-8.
- Waltershausen, Wolfgang Sartorius von (1965) [1856]. Gauss zum Gedächtniss. Sändig Reprint Verlag H. R. Wohlwend. ISBN 978-3-253-01702-5.
Mathematics
View on GrokipediaFundamentals
Notation and Terminology
Mathematical notation serves as a universal language that enables precise communication of abstract concepts, facilitating both computation and reasoning across diverse mathematical disciplines. This symbolic system, comprising operators, signs, and specialized vocabulary, evolved over centuries from ad hoc representations to standardized forms that minimize ambiguity and enhance efficiency. Key arithmetic symbols such as addition (+), subtraction (−), multiplication (×), and division (÷) originated in the late 15th century, initially in mercantile contexts; for instance, the plus and minus signs were first employed by German accountant Johannes Widmann in 1489 to denote surplus and deficit in bookkeeping. The equals sign (=), a cornerstone of algebraic notation, was invented by Welsh mathematician Robert Recorde in 1557 to avoid repetitive phrases like "is equal to," as detailed in his treatise The Whetstone of Witte, where he described it as "two small parallel lines" representing equivalence.[9] More advanced symbols emerged later: the summation sign (∑) was introduced by Leonhard Euler in the 18th century to denote series accumulation, while the integral symbol (∫) was devised by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz around 1675, inspired by the Latin "summa" for integration as an accumulation process.[10][11] Logical operators, essential for formal reasoning, include conjunction (∧), disjunction (∨), and negation (¬). The wedge (∧) for "and" and vee (∨) for "or" were standardized in the early 20th century, drawing from set theory notations where ∧ represents intersection and ∨ union, with ∨ tracing to the 19th-century abbreviation of Latin "vel" for "or."[12] The negation symbol (¬) appeared in the mid-19th century, often as an inverted L or tilde, to denote logical denial.[12] The adoption of Hindu-Arabic numerals (0-9) in Europe marked a pivotal shift in notation, replacing cumbersome Roman numerals; Italian mathematician Fibonacci promoted their use in his 1202 book Liber Abaci, demonstrating superior efficiency for arithmetic, with widespread acceptance by the 13th century in Italian commerce.[13] Terminology in mathematics provides a structured lexicon for foundational elements. An axiom is a statement accepted as true without proof, serving as the starting point for deductive systems, such as Euclid's postulates in geometry.[14] A theorem is a proven assertion derived from axioms and prior results, representing significant established truths. A lemma is a subsidiary proposition, typically proven to aid in establishing a larger theorem, while a corollary is a direct, often immediate consequence of a theorem, requiring minimal additional justification.[14] To ensure consistency, international standards like ISO 80000-2:2009 specify mathematical signs and symbols, defining their meanings, verbal equivalents, and applications in scientific contexts, promoting uniformity in global mathematical discourse.[15] This notation underpins proofs by providing a compact means to express logical relations, though detailed structures are explored in foundational logic.Sets, Logic, and Proofs
Set theory forms the foundational framework for modern mathematics, providing a rigorous basis for defining mathematical objects and structures. A set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects, called elements or members, which can be anything from numbers to other sets. Basic operations on sets include union (), which combines all elements from sets and ; intersection (), which contains elements common to both; and difference (), which includes elements in but not in . The power set of a set , denoted , is the set of all subsets of , and its cardinality grows exponentially with that of .[16] Cardinality measures the "size" of a set, defined via bijections: two sets have the same cardinality if there exists a one-to-one correspondence between their elements. Finite sets have cardinalities equal to natural numbers, while infinite sets introduce transfinite cardinals. The natural numbers have cardinality (aleph-null), the smallest infinite cardinality, representing countable infinity; for example, the integers and rationals also have cardinality , as they can be bijected with . Uncountable sets, like the reals with cardinality (the continuum), are larger.[16][17] The standard axiomatic foundation for set theory is Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC), comprising nine axioms that avoid paradoxes like Russell's. Key axioms include extensionality (sets are equal if they have the same elements), pairing (for any and , there exists ), union, power set, infinity (there exists an infinite set, such as ), replacement (functions map sets to sets), foundation (also known as regularity; every nonempty set has an element disjoint from it, preventing infinite descending membership chains), and the axiom of choice states that for any collection of nonempty sets, there exists a set containing one element from each. ZFC resolves foundational issues but leaves open questions like the continuum hypothesis, which posits that there is no set with cardinality strictly between and ; its undecidability in ZFC was shown by Gödel in 1940 (consistency) and Cohen in 1963 (independence).[18][16][19] Propositional logic deals with statements that are true or false, using connectives to form compound propositions. The primary connectives are negation (, true if is false), conjunction (, true if both are true), disjunction (, true if at least one is true), implication (, false only if is true and false), and biconditional (, true if both have the same truth value). Truth tables systematically evaluate these: for example, the implication has truth values T T → T, T F → F, F T → T, F F → T. A tautology is a proposition always true, like , while a contradiction is always false, like .[20] Predicate logic, or first-order logic, extends propositional logic by incorporating predicates (relations on objects) and quantifiers. Quantifiers include universal (true if holds for every in the domain) and existential (true if holds for some ). For instance, is true for positive reals, while asserts the existence of . First-order logic formalizes statements about structures, enabling definitions of mathematical concepts like groups or fields within ZFC.[21] Proofs establish the truth of mathematical statements using logical deduction from axioms or prior theorems. A direct proof assumes the premise and derives the conclusion via valid inferences. Proof by contrapositive shows by proving . Proof by contradiction assumes under and derives an absurdity, like assuming is rational and reaching a contradiction in its prime factorization. Mathematical induction proves statements for natural numbers: for weak induction, verify base case , then assume (inductive hypothesis) and show ; strong induction assumes all to for . For example, induction proves : base holds, and assuming for yields the sum to . Gödel's incompleteness theorems (1931) reveal inherent limitations in formal systems. The first theorem states that any consistent formal system capable of expressing basic arithmetic (like Peano arithmetic or ZFC) is incomplete: there exists a true sentence unprovable within the system. The second theorem asserts that such a system cannot prove its own consistency. These results, proven via Gödel numbering (encoding statements as numbers) and a self-referential sentence like "This statement is unprovable," underscore that no single axiomatic system can capture all mathematical truths.Areas of Mathematics
Algebra
Algebra encompasses the study of mathematical structures and systems of operations, generalizing arithmetic principles to abstract settings beyond specific numbers. It provides tools for solving equations, manipulating symbols, and understanding symmetries, forming a foundational pillar of mathematics that influences diverse fields from physics to computer science. At its core, algebra shifts focus from concrete computations to patterns and relations, enabling the classification of solutions and the exploration of properties invariant under transformations.[22] Basic algebra begins with polynomials, which are finite sums of terms involving variables raised to non-negative integer powers and multiplied by coefficients, such as . These expressions are manipulated through addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division (when possible), forming the basis for solving equations. Linear equations of the form yield solutions for , while quadratic equations (with ) are resolved using the quadratic formula: derived from completing the square and dating back to Babylonian methods around 2000 BCE, later formalized by Greek geometers and Renaissance algebraists.[23][24] Inequalities, such as , extend these concepts by identifying intervals where expressions hold, solved by similar techniques but preserving inequality directions during operations like multiplying by negatives.[25] Abstract algebra generalizes these ideas through algebraic structures. A group is a set equipped with a binary operation satisfying closure, associativity, identity existence, and invertibility; it is abelian if the operation commutes and cyclic if generated by a single element. Lagrange's theorem states that in a finite group , the order of any subgroup divides the order of , a result originating from Joseph-Louis Lagrange's 1770 analysis of polynomial root permutations.[26] Rings extend groups by adding a second operation (multiplication) distributive over the first; an integral domain is a commutative ring with unity and no zero divisors, while a field is an integral domain where every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse. Examples include the real numbers under standard addition and multiplication, and finite fields for prime , used in modular arithmetic.[27][28] Vector spaces, or linear spaces over a field, consist of elements (vectors) closed under addition and scalar multiplication, with a basis as a linearly independent spanning set whose cardinality defines the dimension. Linear transformations between vector spaces preserve these operations, represented by matrices relative to chosen bases.[29][30] Key theorems illuminate these structures: the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra asserts that every non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root, first rigorously proved by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1799.[31] The Cayley-Hamilton theorem declares that every square matrix satisfies its own characteristic polynomial , so .[32] Linear algebra applies these abstractions to matrices, rectangular arrays of numbers representing linear transformations or systems of equations. The determinant of a matrix is , quantifying invertibility and volume scaling. Eigenvalues are scalars satisfying for nonzero , found by solving the characteristic equation . To solve systems , Gaussian elimination row-reduces the augmented matrix to row echelon form, a method systematized by Gauss around 1809 for astronomical computations.[33][34][35] Galois theory, pioneered by Évariste Galois in the 1830s, connects polynomial solvability to field extensions and group theory. It examines splitting fields of polynomials over a base field (like ), where the Galois group—automorphisms fixing the base—measures symmetries; a polynomial is solvable by radicals if its Galois group is solvable, explaining why quintics generally resist radical solutions unlike quadratics or cubics. This framework links algebraic equations to broader field towers, resolving centuries-old questions on constructibility.[36] Algebraic structures like groups and fields also underpin geometric transformations, such as symmetries in polyhedra.[22]Geometry and Topology
Geometry and topology constitute foundational branches of mathematics that investigate the properties of space, shapes, and their transformations, both in classical and abstract settings. Geometry traditionally examines figures and their relations in Euclidean space, while topology extends these ideas to more general spaces where continuous deformations are considered, preserving essential connectivity without regard to distances or angles. These fields underpin much of modern mathematics, providing tools to model physical spaces and abstract structures alike. Euclidean geometry, systematized by Euclid in his Elements around 300 BCE, forms the basis for understanding spatial relations in flat space.[37] Fundamental primitives include points, which have no size or dimension; lines, which are the shortest paths between two points extending infinitely; and planes, which are flat two-dimensional extents containing lines.[38] Congruence describes figures that can be superimposed via rigid motions such as translations, rotations, or reflections, ensuring equal corresponding sides and angles./05:_Geometry/5.02:_Euclidean_geometry-_a_brief_summary) Similarity extends this to figures that are scalar multiples of congruent ones, maintaining proportional sides and equal angles.[39] A key result is the Pythagorean theorem, which asserts that in a right triangle, the square of the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the other two sides: where is the hypotenuse.[40] For circles, a central object in Euclidean geometry, the circumference relates to the diameter by the constant ratio , so ; this irrational number, approximately 3.14159, defines the circle's intrinsic scale. Non-Euclidean geometries emerged in the 19th century by relaxing Euclid's parallel postulate, which states that through a point not on a given line, exactly one parallel line exists. Hyperbolic geometry, developed independently by Nikolai Lobachevsky in his 1829 paper "On the Principles of Geometry" and János Bolyai in his 1832 Appendix, features multiple parallels through such a point, with parallel lines diverging and triangle angle sums less than 180 degrees. Elliptic geometry, also known as spherical geometry in its finite form, admits no parallels, as lines converge, and triangle angles sum to more than 180 degrees. Carl Friedrich Gauss explored these ideas privately in letters from the early 1800s, recognizing their consistency without publication.[41] These geometries reveal that spatial properties depend on underlying axioms, challenging the universality of Euclidean space. Analytic geometry, pioneered by René Descartes in his 1637 La Géométrie, bridges algebra and geometry through coordinate systems.[42] In the Cartesian plane, points are represented as ordered pairs , with the -axis horizontal and -axis vertical intersecting at the origin . The distance between two points and is given by the formula derived from the Pythagorean theorem applied to the coordinate differences.[43] This framework allows algebraic equations to describe geometric loci; for instance, conic sections arise as level sets of quadratic equations, with the parabola defined by (for ) representing points equidistant from a focus and directrix.[42] Topology abstracts geometric properties invariant under continuous deformations, focusing on qualitative features rather than metrics. A topological space consists of a set equipped with a collection of open sets satisfying axioms of union, intersection, and containing the empty set and whole space; closed sets are complements of open ones.[44] Continuity of a function between topological spaces means preimages of open sets in are open in , generalizing the - notion without quantifying closeness. Compactness requires every open cover to have a finite subcover, ensuring "boundedness" in abstract terms, while connectedness means no separation into disjoint nonempty open subsets, preventing "splitting." Exemplary non-orientable surfaces include the Möbius strip, formed by twisting and joining a rectangle's ends, which has a single boundary and reverses orientation; and the Klein bottle, a closed surface embeddable in four dimensions, also non-orientable with self-intersecting immersions in three dimensions.[45] Differential geometry studies smooth curves and surfaces using calculus, quantifying how they deviate from flatness. Curves are parametrized paths in space, with tangent vectors measuring direction and speed. Surfaces are two-dimensional manifolds locally like , parametrized by charts. Curvature captures bending: for surfaces, Gaussian curvature at a point combines principal curvatures and (radii of curvature) as ; on a sphere of radius , , positive indicating elliptic behavior.[46] Carl Friedrich Gauss introduced this intrinsic measure in his 1827 Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas, showing it depends only on the surface's metric, not embedding.[47] Bernhard Riemann generalized this in 1854 with manifolds—higher-dimensional analogs of surfaces—and Riemannian metrics, positive-definite bilinear forms on tangent spaces defining lengths via , enabling geometry on abstract curved spaces.[48]Analysis and Calculus
Analysis and calculus form a cornerstone of mathematics, providing the tools to study continuous change, infinite processes, and the behavior of functions over real and complex domains. Mathematical analysis establishes the rigorous foundations for calculus by formalizing concepts like limits and continuity, enabling precise reasoning about approximations and convergence. Calculus, in turn, applies these foundations to compute rates of change through differentiation and accumulations through integration, with profound applications in physics, engineering, and beyond. The field emerged in the 17th century with the independent developments of Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who linked differentiation and integration via the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, though their work lacked full rigor until the 19th century.[49] Modern analysis, building on contributions from Augustin-Louis Cauchy, Bernhard Riemann, and Henri Lebesgue, addresses limitations of early calculus by handling discontinuities and infinite series more robustly.Limits and Continuity
Limits capture the idea that a function approaches a specific value as its input nears a point, forming the basis for derivatives and integrals. The precise ε-δ definition states that the limit of as approaches is if, for every , there exists a such that if , then . This formulation, introduced by Karl Weierstrass in his 1861 lecture notes, ensures arbitrary closeness in output for sufficiently close inputs, excluding the point itself to handle discontinuities.[50] One-sided limits consider approaches from the left () or right (), which must agree for the two-sided limit to exist. Continuity at a point requires the limit to equal the function value there, , guaranteeing no jumps or breaks. Sequences, as functions from naturals to reals, converge if their terms approach a limit, while series converge if the partial sums form a Cauchy sequence, bounded by tests like the ratio test: if , the series converges absolutely.[51]Differential Calculus
Differential calculus quantifies instantaneous rates of change via the derivative, defined as , representing the slope of the tangent line to the graph of at . This limit, formalized in the 19th century, extends the intuitive notion of velocity as the limit of average speeds.[52] Key rules simplify computation: the product rule , quotient rule , and chain rule , enabling derivatives of composite functions. Applications include optimization, where critical points () yield maxima or minima via the first or second derivative test, and related rates, modeling how changes in one variable affect another, such as in fluid flow or population growth.[53]Integral Calculus
Integral calculus computes accumulations, with the definite integral representing the net area under the curve of from to , approximated by Riemann sums of rectangles whose widths approach zero. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus bridges differentiation and integration: if is continuous, then , and . Discovered by Newton and Leibniz around 1670, this theorem transforms integration into antidifferentiation.[49] Techniques include substitution, reversing the chain rule, and integration by parts , derived from the product rule. These methods handle trigonometric, exponential, and logarithmic integrals, essential for solving differential equations modeling physical systems like harmonic motion.[54]Multivariable and Vector Calculus
Extending to multiple variables, partial derivatives fix other variables to isolate change in one direction, while the gradient points toward steepest ascent, with magnitude as the directional rate. Line integrals accumulate work along a path, and surface integrals compute flux through a surface. Fundamental theorems unify these: Green's theorem equates line integrals around a plane region to double integrals of curl, ; Stokes' theorem generalizes to surfaces, ; and the Divergence theorem relates volume integrals to surface flux, . These, developed in the 19th century, simplify computations in electromagnetism and fluid dynamics.[55]Real Analysis
Real analysis rigorizes calculus on the real line, using metric spaces where distance is the absolute value. The Riemann integral partitions intervals into subintervals, sums times widths, and takes limits of upper and lower sums; a bounded function is Riemann integrable if these coincide, as for continuous functions on compact sets. However, it fails for highly discontinuous functions like the Dirichlet function.[56] The Lebesgue measure addresses this by assigning sizes to sets via outer measure, covering with intervals and infimizing lengths, then restricting to measurable sets satisfying Carathéodory's criterion. Lebesgue integration integrates over measurable sets, handling absolute continuity and yielding a broader class of integrable functions, foundational for probability and functional analysis. Introduced by Henri Lebesgue in 1902, it unifies integration with measure theory.[57]Complex Analysis
Complex analysis studies holomorphic functions, differentiable in the complex sense, satisfying Cauchy-Riemann equations , for . Cauchy's integral theorem states that if is holomorphic in a simply connected domain, for closed curves . The integral formula follows: for holomorphic inside and on a simple closed curve , for inside , implying analytic functions are determined by boundary values. Derived by Cauchy in 1825, this enables residue calculus for evaluating real integrals via contours.[58]Number Theory
Number theory, a core branch of pure mathematics, examines the properties and relationships of integers, emphasizing arithmetic operations, divisibility, and patterns among whole numbers. It originated with ancient inquiries into prime numbers and divisibility, evolving into a field that underpins modern cryptography and analytic techniques for prime distribution. Central to number theory is the concept of divisibility, where one integer divides another if their quotient is an integer; prime numbers, defined as positive integers greater than 1 with no positive divisors other than 1 and themselves, form the building blocks of all integers via unique factorization.[59] Divisibility leads to key functions like the greatest common divisor (GCD), the largest positive integer dividing both inputs without remainder, computed efficiently via the Euclidean algorithm: for integers and with , , recursing until the remainder is zero.[60] This algorithm, dating to ancient Greece, enables practical computations and relates to the least common multiple (LCM), the smallest positive integer divisible by both, satisfying .[61] Modular arithmetic extends these ideas, defining congruence if divides , creating residue classes that simplify large computations. Fermat's Little Theorem states that if is prime and is not divisible by , then , a foundational result for primality testing.[62] Euler's theorem generalizes this: if , then , where is Euler's totient function counting integers up to coprime to .[63] Diophantine equations, seeking integer solutions to polynomial equations, highlight number theory's depth; linear forms like Pell's equation for square-free have infinitely many solutions generated from a fundamental pair , using the recurrence , .[64] A landmark is Fermat's Last Theorem, conjectured in 1637, asserting no positive integers satisfy for ; Andrew Wiles proved it in 1994 by linking it to the modularity of semistable elliptic curves.[65] Analytic number theory employs complex analysis to study integers asymptotically; the Riemann zeta function, defined for as , extends meromorphically and encodes prime information via its Euler product over primes .[66] The Prime Number Theorem, proved independently by Hadamard and de la Vallée Poussin in 1896, states that the prime-counting function satisfies , indicating primes have density zero but are roughly evenly distributed logarithmically.[67] Number theory's applications include cryptography, where the RSA algorithm secures data by exploiting the difficulty of factoring large semiprimes; keys are generated from primes with modulus and public exponent coprime to , enabling encryption and decryption via private exponent where .[68]Discrete Mathematics
Discrete mathematics encompasses the study of mathematical structures that are countable, finite, or algorithmic in nature, focusing on distinct elements rather than continuous quantities. Unlike branches dealing with real numbers and limits, it emphasizes objects such as integers, graphs, and sequences that can be enumerated or processed step by step. This field provides foundational tools for computer science, cryptography, and optimization problems involving finite sets. Combinatorics, a core area of discrete mathematics, concerns counting, arranging, and optimizing selections from finite sets. Permutations count the number of ways to order distinct objects, given by the factorial . Combinations, in contrast, count selections without regard to order, with the binomial coefficient representing the number of ways to choose items from . These concepts underpin the binomial theorem, which expands for nonnegative integers , originally generalized by Isaac Newton in his 1676 letters to Henry Oldenburg for non-integer exponents.[69] Graph theory models relationships between discrete objects using graphs, defined as sets of vertices connected by edges. Key structures include paths (sequences of connected edges without repetition) and cycles (closed paths). For planar graphs, which can be drawn without edge crossings, Euler's formula relates vertices , edges , and faces via , first conjectured by Leonhard Euler in a 1750 letter to Christian Goldbach and rigorously proved in his later work on polyhedra. Shortest paths in weighted graphs are computed efficiently using Dijkstra's algorithm, which iteratively selects the minimum-distance vertex from a priority queue, as introduced by Edsger W. Dijkstra in 1959 for network routing problems.[70] Recursion defines sequences through self-referential relations, exemplified by the Fibonacci sequence where for , with initial conditions and , tracing back to Leonardo Fibonacci's 1202 problem on rabbit populations in Liber Abaci. Generating functions encode such sequences as formal power series; the ordinary generating function for a sequence is , a technique pioneered by Euler in the 18th century to solve recurrence relations and partition problems.[71] In discrete contexts, logic employs Boolean algebra, which treats propositions as variables over with operations AND (), OR (), and NOT (), formalized by George Boole in his 1847 The Mathematical Analysis of Logic to mechanize deductive reasoning. Boolean expressions are simplified using Karnaugh maps, grid-based diagrams that group adjacent 1s to minimize terms, invented by Maurice Karnaugh in 1953 for synthesizing combinational logic circuits.[72][73] Discrete mathematics informs algorithm analysis through asymptotic notation, where big-O describes upper bounds on growth rates as for functions bounded by a constant multiple of for large , popularized by Edmund Landau in 1909 and extensively applied by Donald Knuth in computational complexity. For instance, quicksort, a divide-and-conquer sorting algorithm that partitions an array around a pivot and recurses on subarrays, achieves average-case time complexity , as analyzed in C. A. R. Hoare's original 1961 implementation.[74]Probability and Statistics
Probability and statistics constitute a branch of mathematics that deals with uncertainty, randomness, and the analysis of data to draw inferences about populations from samples. Probability theory provides the mathematical framework for quantifying the likelihood of events, while statistics applies these principles to interpret empirical data, enabling predictions and decision-making under uncertainty. This field underpins diverse applications, from risk assessment in finance to experimental design in science, emphasizing the modeling of random phenomena and the validation of hypotheses through rigorous methods.[75] The foundations of probability rest on the concept of a sample space Ω, which encompasses all possible outcomes of a random experiment, and events as subsets of Ω. The probability measure P assigns non-negative values to events such that P(Ω) = 1, and for disjoint events A and B, P(A ∪ B) = P(A) + P(B); more generally, for any events A and B, P(A ∪ B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ∩ B). These axioms, formalized by Andrey Kolmogorov in 1933, ensure a consistent measure-theoretic structure for probability, resolving earlier inconsistencies in classical approaches.[75] Conditional probability defines P(A|B) as P(A ∩ B)/P(B) when P(B) > 0, capturing the likelihood of A given B has occurred. Bayes' theorem, derived from this, states P(A|B) = [P(B|A) P(A)] / P(B), allowing the update of probabilities based on new evidence; it was originally proposed by Thomas Bayes in 1763 and later expanded by Pierre-Simon Laplace.[76] A random variable X maps outcomes in the sample space to real numbers, serving as a quantifiable representation of random phenomena. For discrete random variables, the probability mass function (PMF) gives P(X = x), summing to 1 over all x; the cumulative distribution function (CDF) is F(x) = P(X ≤ x). Continuous random variables are characterized by a probability density function (PDF) f(x) ≥ 0 with ∫{-∞}^∞ f(x) dx = 1, and CDF F(x) = ∫{-∞}^x f(t) dt. The expectation E[X], or mean, measures the average value: for discrete X, E[X] = ∑ x P(X = x); for continuous, E[X] = ∫_{-∞}^∞ x f(x) dx. These concepts, integral to modern probability as axiomatized by Kolmogorov, facilitate the analysis of variability and long-term behavior in random systems.[75] Key probability distributions model specific random processes. The binomial distribution describes the number of successes in n independent Bernoulli trials, each with success probability p; its PMF is P(X = k) = \binom{n}{k} p^k (1-p)^{n-k}, introduced by Jacob Bernoulli in his 1713 work Ars Conjectandi. The normal distribution, or Gaussian, with mean μ and variance σ², has PDF f(x) = (1/(σ √(2π))) exp(-(x - μ)²/(2σ²)); approximately 68% of values lie within μ ± σ, 95% within μ ± 2σ, and 99.7% within μ ± 3σ, as derived by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1809 for error analysis in astronomy. The central limit theorem asserts that the distribution of sample means from independent identically distributed random variables with finite mean and variance approaches the normal distribution as sample size increases, a result first approximated for binomial cases by Abraham de Moivre in 1738 and generalized by Laplace.[77] Statistics divides into descriptive and inferential branches. Descriptive statistics summarize data using measures like the mean μ = (1/n) ∑ x_i, median (middle value in ordered data), and variance σ² = (1/n) ∑ (x_i - μ)² for a sample of size n, providing a snapshot of central tendency and spread without generalization. Inferential statistics extends this to populations via hypothesis testing and confidence intervals. Hypothesis testing, developed by Ronald Fisher in the 1920s, evaluates a null hypothesis H_0 against an alternative using a p-value, the probability of observing data as extreme as or more than the sample under H_0; small p-values (e.g., < 0.05) suggest rejecting H_0. Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson advanced this with the likelihood ratio test, controlling error rates. Confidence intervals, introduced by Neyman in 1937, provide a range [L, U] such that the true parameter lies within it with probability 1 - α (e.g., 95%), constructed from sample data to quantify estimation uncertainty.[78] Stochastic processes model systems evolving randomly over time or space, with Markov chains as a fundamental example where future states depend only on the current state, not the past. Defined by a state space and transition matrix P where P_{ij} = P(X_{t+1} = j | X_t = i), a Markov chain has a stationary distribution π satisfying π P = π with ∑ π_i = 1, representing long-run proportions if irreducible and aperiodic. Andrei Markov introduced these chains in 1906 to analyze sequences of dependent events, such as letter occurrences in texts, demonstrating the law of large numbers holds under conditional independence. Combinatorial probabilities, such as those in counting favorable outcomes, often inform initial event probabilities in these models.[79]Computational Mathematics
Computational mathematics encompasses the development and analysis of algorithms and numerical methods to solve mathematical problems that are intractable analytically, bridging pure theory with practical computation. It relies on digital computers to approximate solutions with controlled error, often involving iterative processes and discretization techniques. Key areas include numerical analysis for root-finding and interpolation, approximation methods like series expansions, solving linear systems via iterative schemes, optimization algorithms, and recent integrations with machine learning. These tools are essential in fields ranging from engineering simulations to scientific modeling, enabling the handling of large-scale data and complex systems. In numerical analysis, root-finding methods such as Newton's method iteratively refine approximations to solve equations of the form . The update rule is given by which converges quadratically near simple roots under suitable conditions, making it efficient for smooth functions. For example, it is widely used in optimization and physics simulations. Interpolation techniques, like Lagrange polynomials, construct a polynomial passing through given data points for , with the formula This method is particularly useful for data fitting and numerical integration, though it can suffer from Runge's phenomenon for high degrees on unequally spaced points. Approximation methods provide ways to estimate functions and their derivatives computationally. Taylor series expansions represent analytic functions around a point as with truncation errors bounded by the remainder term, such as Lagrange's form for some between and , ensuring accuracy for small . Finite differences offer discrete approximations to derivatives; for instance, the central difference for the first derivative is with error , commonly applied in solving differential equations via methods like finite difference schemes. These techniques prioritize computational efficiency while quantifying approximation errors. Solving linear systems forms a cornerstone of computational mathematics, especially for large sparse matrices where direct methods like Gaussian elimination are prohibitive. Iterative methods such as the Jacobi iteration update components independently: while the Gauss-Seidel method uses updated values immediately for faster convergence in diagonally dominant systems. The condition number measures sensitivity to perturbations, with well-conditioned matrices () yielding stable solutions; ill-conditioned ones amplify errors, as seen in Hilbert matrices where grows exponentially with dimension. These methods underpin applications in fluid dynamics and circuit analysis. Optimization in computational mathematics seeks minima of functions subject to constraints, vital for parameter estimation and resource allocation. Gradient descent iteratively moves along the negative gradient: where is the step size, converging linearly for convex functions and forming the basis for stochastic variants in large datasets. For linear programming problems subject to , , the simplex method traverses basic feasible solutions at vertices of the feasible polyhedron, pivoting efficiently in practice despite worst-case exponential time. Developed by George Dantzig in 1947, it remains a standard in operations research. Modern computational mathematics increasingly integrates with machine learning, where neural networks are trained as large-scale optimization problems minimizing loss functions via variants of gradient descent, such as Adam optimizer, enabling pattern recognition and prediction on vast datasets. Post-2020 advances include AI-driven theorem proving, exemplified by AlphaGeometry, which combines language models with symbolic deduction to solve complex geometry problems from International Mathematical Olympiad contests, achieving silver-medal performance in 2024 by generating novel proofs. These developments highlight computation's role in augmenting human mathematical discovery.History of Mathematics
Ancient Developments
Mathematics in ancient civilizations emerged primarily to address practical needs in agriculture, trade, architecture, and astronomy, laying foundational concepts in arithmetic and geometry. The earliest systematic developments occurred in Mesopotamia around 3000 BCE, where scribes recorded numerical methods on clay tablets using a sexagesimal (base-60) positional system that facilitated divisions by many integers and persists today in time and angular measurements. This system enabled solutions to quadratic equations through geometric interpretations and algebraic manipulations, as seen in tablets like YBC 7289, which approximate square roots via iterative methods. Additionally, Mesopotamian mathematicians identified Pythagorean triples, such as (3,4,5), well before Pythagoras, with Plimpton 322 (c. 1800 BCE) listing 15 such triples derived from parametric equations, demonstrating advanced table-based computation for right-triangle sides.[80][81][81] In ancient Egypt, circa 2000 BCE, mathematics focused on administrative and construction tasks, as evidenced by the Rhind Papyrus (c. 1650 BCE), a scribe's manual containing 84 problems on arithmetic, fractions, and geometry. Egyptians expressed fractions as sums of distinct unit fractions (e.g., ), a convention that simplified practical calculations but limited theoretical abstraction. The Rhind Papyrus includes problems (56–60) on determining the seked (a measure of the slope or inclination of pyramid faces), essential for pyramid construction. The Egyptians applied the volume formula for square-based pyramids, corroborated by architectural evidence from the Old Kingdom. Additionally, the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus (c. 1850 BCE) preserves the formula for the volume of a truncated pyramid: , where and are the side lengths of the lower and upper bases and is the height. This knowledge, alongside linear measures and area computations for fields, supported the precise engineering of monumental structures like the Great Pyramid of Giza.[82][83][84] Greek mathematics, from approximately 600 BCE to 300 CE, shifted toward deductive reasoning and abstract proof, influencing Western thought profoundly. Thales of Miletus (c. 624–546 BCE) introduced geometric theorems, such as the intercept theorem for similar triangles, marking an early emphasis on logical deduction from axioms. The Pythagorean school, founded by Pythagoras (c. 570–495 BCE), explored number mysticism and geometry, discovering the irrationality of through a proof by contradiction, which challenged their integer-based worldview. Euclid's Elements (c. 300 BCE) systematized this tradition in 13 books, starting with axioms and common notions to prove theorems like the Pythagorean theorem and the parallel postulate, establishing geometry as a rigorous deductive science. Archimedes (c. 287–212 BCE) advanced analysis with the method of exhaustion, bounding between and (approximately 3.1416) by inscribing and circumscribing polygons around a circle, a precursor to integral calculus.[85][86][85][87][85] Parallel developments in India and China around the same era addressed ritual and calendrical needs. The Sulba Sutras (c. 800–500 BCE), Vedic texts on altar construction, contained geometric rules approximating (e.g., a rope length of ) and stating the Pythagorean theorem for right triangles used in fire altars. In China, the Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art (c. 200 BCE) included methods for solving systems of linear equations using the fangcheng procedure, a precursor to Gaussian elimination, essential for administrative and engineering computations.[88][88][89] Astronomical applications intertwined with these mathematical advances, particularly in Mesopotamia and Greece. Babylonians tracked lunar cycles using arithmetic progressions and sexagesimal tables, predicting syzygies (new and full moons) over 18-year Saros cycles to align lunar and solar calendars, as recorded in astronomical diaries from 747 BCE. In Greece, Aristarchus of Samos (c. 310–230 BCE) proposed a heliocentric model, estimating the distance to the Sun as about 20 times the Earth-Moon distance using geometric arguments from the quarter moon phase, though it gained little traction against geocentric views.[90][90][87][91]Medieval and Renaissance Advances
During the Islamic Golden Age, spanning roughly from the 8th to the 14th centuries, mathematicians in the Abbasid Caliphate made profound advancements in algebra, arithmetic, and astronomy, building on translations of Greek, Indian, and Persian works while introducing innovative methods.[92] The scholar Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, working in Baghdad around 820 CE, authored Al-Kitab al-mukhtasar fi hisab al-jabr wal-muqabala (The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing), which systematized the solution of linear and quadratic equations through geometric and arithmetic techniques.[93] Al-Khwarizmi classified quadratic equations of the form into six types, solving them by completing the square and balancing terms, laying the foundation for algebra as a distinct discipline.[94] His work also facilitated the transmission of Indian numerals—including the decimal positional system—to the Islamic world, enhancing computational efficiency for trade and science.[95] Later in this era, Persian mathematician Omar Khayyam advanced algebraic geometry in his Treatise on Demonstration of Problems of Algebra (c. 1070 CE), providing geometric solutions to cubic equations using conic sections.[96] Khayyam classified 25 types of cubic equations, such as those equivalent to , and intersected parabolas and circles to find positive real roots, emphasizing geometric constructions over purely symbolic manipulation.[97] These methods highlighted the interplay between algebra and Euclidean geometry, influencing subsequent European developments.[98] In medieval Europe, mathematical progress was slower following the fall of Rome but accelerated through interactions with Islamic scholarship via trade and translations in Spain and Italy. Italian mathematician Leonardo of Pisa, known as Fibonacci, published Liber Abaci in 1202, introducing the Hindu-Arabic numeral system to Europe and demonstrating its superiority for arithmetic operations like multiplication and division.[99] The book included practical problems in commerce, such as calculating profits and converting currencies, which popularized the decimal system and displaced Roman numerals in business by the 15th century.[100] Around 1415, architect Filippo Brunelleschi applied geometric principles to develop linear perspective in art, using vanishing points and proportional scaling to represent three-dimensional space on flat surfaces, as seen in his Florence Baptistery demonstrations.[101] This technique, rooted in Euclidean geometry, bridged mathematics and visual representation, influencing Renaissance painters like Masaccio.[102] Trigonometry evolved significantly during this period, transitioning from Greek chord-based methods to more versatile functions. Syrian astronomer al-Battani (c. 858–929 CE) refined trigonometric tables in his Zij (astronomical handbook), deriving the sine function from half-chords and applying it to solve spherical triangles for astronomical calculations.[103] His tables, accurate to within 0.0002 degrees for solar positions, improved predictions of eclipses and planetary motions.[92] In Europe, German mathematician Regiomontanus (Johannes Müller von Königsberg) advanced this work with his Tabulae Directionum (1467), computing sine tables to seven sexagesimal places using interpolation, which supported navigation and surveying.[104] These tables marked a step toward modern trigonometry by emphasizing decimal-like precision.[105] Contributions from India and China further enriched global mathematics, emphasizing arithmetic innovations and series expansions. Indian astronomer Brahmagupta, in his Brahmasphutasiddhanta (628 CE), formalized zero not merely as a placeholder but as a number with arithmetic rules, such as and , enabling negative numbers and quadratic solutions.[106] This framework underpinned the decimal system's robustness. In the Kerala School of India around 1400 CE, Madhava of Sangamagrama developed infinite series approximations for trigonometric functions and π, using iterative corrections to achieve values like π ≈ 3.14159265359, centuries before European equivalents.[107] These series, derived from geometric integrals, demonstrated early calculus-like techniques for convergence.[108] Chinese mathematicians, meanwhile, refined fraction algorithms and negative solutions in works like Sunzi Suanjing (c. 400 CE, with medieval commentaries), which included the Chinese remainder theorem, solving systems of congruences (e.g., finding such that , , ) via successive substitutions, essential for calendar adjustments and precursors to cryptography.[89] The Renaissance marked a synthesis of these traditions in Europe, culminating in Italian polymath Gerolamo Cardano's Ars Magna (1545), which presented general algebraic solutions to cubic and quartic equations using radicals.[109] Cardano detailed methods for equations like , crediting predecessors like Scipione del Ferro and Lodovico Ferrari, whose quartic solutions involved resolving cubics first.[110] This work introduced complex numbers implicitly through negative roots and spurred algebraic research, transitioning mathematics toward symbolic generality.[111]Modern and Contemporary Era
The modern era of mathematics began in the 17th century with the independent development of calculus by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, providing foundational tools for analyzing change and motion. Newton formulated his version in the 1660s, using fluxions to describe instantaneous rates of change, which he applied extensively in his 1687 work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica.[112] Leibniz, working concurrently in the 1670s, introduced the notation of differentials and integrals that remains standard today, publishing his ideas in the Acta Eruditorum starting in 1684.[113] Their contributions enabled precise modeling in physics and engineering, though a priority dispute arose in the early 18th century.[114] In the 18th century, Leonhard Euler advanced calculus and analysis through prolific work, including the 1748 formulation of Euler's identity, , which elegantly links exponential, imaginary, and trigonometric functions in his Introductio in analysin infinitorum.[115] Euler's contributions extended to graph theory, number theory, and fluid dynamics, solidifying the period's emphasis on rigorous analysis.[116] Joseph-Louis Lagrange further transformed mechanics with his 1788 Mécanique Analytique, introducing Lagrangian mechanics based on the principle of least action and energy conservation, independent of Newtonian forces.[117] The 19th century saw abstraction deepen with non-Euclidean geometry and algebraic structures. Nikolai Lobachevsky published the first explicit construction of hyperbolic geometry in 1829, rejecting Euclid's parallel postulate and demonstrating consistent alternatives.[118] Évariste Galois developed group theory in the 1830s to resolve polynomial solvability, introducing Galois groups in his posthumously published 1846 memoir, linking symmetry to field extensions.[119] Bernhard Riemann's 1854 habilitation lecture generalized geometry to curved spaces via manifolds and metrics, providing the mathematical framework later essential for Einstein's 1915 general relativity.[120] Early 20th-century foundations addressed infinity and logic. Georg Cantor established set theory in the 1870s, proving the real numbers' uncountability and introducing transfinite cardinals in his 1874 paper "On a Property of the Collection of All Real Algebraic Numbers."[121] Ernst Zermelo formalized it axiomatically in 1908, resolving paradoxes with his well-ordering theorem and axiom of choice.[122] Kurt Gödel's 1931 incompleteness theorems showed that any consistent formal system capable of basic arithmetic contains unprovable truths and cannot prove its own consistency.[123] Alan Turing's 1936 paper "On Computable Numbers" defined computability via Turing machines, proving the halting problem undecidable and laying groundwork for theoretical computer science.[124] Post-World War II developments highlighted complexity and computation. Edward Lorenz's 1963 paper "Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow" introduced chaos theory, revealing sensitive dependence on initial conditions in nonlinear dynamical systems through his attractor model.[125] The four-color theorem, conjectured in 1852, was proved in 1976 by Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken using computer-assisted case analysis of 1,936 reducible configurations.[126] Andrew Wiles proved Fermat's Last Theorem in 1994, demonstrating no positive integers satisfy for via the modularity theorem for elliptic curves, published in 1995 after correcting an initial gap.[127] Contemporary mathematics from 2000 to 2025 integrates computation, geometry, and physics. The Langlands program, initiated by Robert Langlands in 1967, saw major advances, including the 2024 proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture by a team led by Dennis Gaitsgory, establishing deep connections between number theory and representation theory via categorical equivalences. For this achievement, Gaitsgory received the 2025 Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics.[128][129] In quantum computing, Peter Shor's 1994 algorithm factors large integers exponentially faster than classical methods, threatening RSA encryption and spurring quantum research.[130] Recent error correction breakthroughs, such as Google's 2023 Willow processor achieving below-threshold logical qubits, enable scalable fault-tolerant quantum computation.[131] AI applications emerged with DeepMind's 2023 FunSearch, using large language models to discover improved solutions for the cap set problem in extremal combinatorics, yielding larger cap sets in dimension 8 than prior human constructions.[132]Philosophy of Mathematics
Ontological Foundations
The ontological foundations of mathematics address the metaphysical status of its objects, such as numbers, sets, and functions, questioning whether they possess independent existence or are merely products of human cognition. This debate centers on the nature of mathematical reality and its relation to the physical world. Platonism, one prominent view, posits that mathematical entities inhabit an abstract, non-spatiotemporal realm, existing timelessly and independently of human minds, and are thus discovered rather than invented.[133] Kurt Gödel, a key proponent, supported this position through his emphasis on mathematical intuition as a faculty for perceiving these objective truths, arguing that the reliability of proofs stems from direct apprehension of abstract forms.[134] In contrast, nominalism and fictionalism reject the independent existence of mathematical objects, viewing them as human linguistic or conceptual constructs without ontological commitment. Nominalists argue that mathematics can be reformulated to eliminate reference to abstract entities, preserving its utility in science without positing their reality. Hartry Field's influential work in the 1980s exemplifies this approach, demonstrating how Newtonian spacetime geometry can be developed without points or other mathematical primitives, thereby conserving empirical content while adhering to nominalistic principles.[135] Fictionalists extend this by treating mathematical statements as useful fictions, akin to narratives in literature, that facilitate scientific reasoning despite lacking truth in a realist sense.[135] Intuitionism offers a middle ground, asserting that mathematical objects exist only through constructive mental processes, denying existence to entities that cannot be explicitly built. Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer, in the early 20th century, founded this school, emphasizing that mathematical truth arises from temporal intuition rather than static observation of abstracts. A core tenet is the rejection of the law of excluded middle for statements about non-constructive objects, as undecidable propositions neither affirm nor deny without a method of construction.[136] Structuralism reframes the ontology by focusing on relational patterns rather than isolated objects, proposing that mathematics studies structures defined by their interrelations, with individual elements like numbers serving as placeholders within systems. Stewart Shapiro's 1997 monograph articulates this view, contending that mathematical entities are positions in abstract structures, such as the natural numbers as places in the progression of successors, thereby avoiding debates over intrinsic properties while capturing the objectivity of mathematical practice. A persistent debate within these foundations concerns infinity, distinguishing between potential infinity—as an unending process, like successive addition—and actual infinity, as a completed totality. Aristotle's ancient influence established potential infinity as philosophically acceptable, while deeming actual infinity incoherent for finite reality. Modern set theory, however, embraces actual infinity through axioms positing infinite sets as fully existent wholes, challenging Aristotelian reservations and aligning with platonistic ontologies.[137]Definitions and Axiomatic Systems
Mathematics is formally defined through axiomatic systems that establish its foundational structures, ensuring consistency and rigor by deriving theorems from a set of primitive notions and axioms. These systems provide the logical framework for branches such as arithmetic and geometry, where undefined terms like "point" or "number" are manipulated according to explicit rules. The Peano axioms, introduced by Giuseppe Peano in 1889, form a cornerstone for the natural numbers, defining them via five postulates in first-order logic. These are: (1) zero is a natural number; (2) for every natural number , there exists a successor which is also a natural number; (3) no natural number has zero as its successor; (4) distinct natural numbers have distinct successors; and (5) the principle of mathematical induction, stating that if a property holds for zero and for whenever it holds for , then it holds for all natural numbers.[138] This system axiomatizes arithmetic operations like addition and multiplication, enabling the development of number theory while avoiding inconsistencies in earlier informal definitions.[138] For geometry, the axioms of Euclid, dating to around 300 BCE in his Elements, were modernized by David Hilbert in 1899 to address gaps in the original formulation, such as unstated continuity assumptions. Hilbert's system groups them into incidence (e.g., two distinct points determine a unique line), order (betweenness relations for collinearity), congruence (equality of segments and angles via rigid motions), parallels (the parallel postulate: through a point not on a line, exactly one parallel line exists), and continuity (Archimedean and completeness axioms ensuring dense lines).[139] These axioms provide a complete, rigorous basis for Euclidean plane geometry, resolving ambiguities like the SAS congruence criterion that Euclid assumed without proof.[139] David Hilbert's program, outlined in his 1900 address on mathematical problems and elaborated in subsequent works, aimed to formalize all of mathematics as a finite system of proofs derived from a consistent set of axioms, using finitary methods to prove the consistency of stronger theories like arithmetic.[140] This ambitious effort sought to secure mathematics against paradoxes by metamathematical analysis, but it was profoundly challenged by Kurt Gödel's 1931 incompleteness theorems, which demonstrated that any sufficiently powerful axiomatic system is either inconsistent or incomplete.[140] Alternative foundational approaches include category theory, developed by Samuel Eilenberg and Saunders Mac Lane in their 1945 paper, which abstracts mathematical structures using categories (collections of objects and morphisms), functors (mappings preserving structure between categories), and natural transformations (morphisms between functors that commute with the category's operations).[141] This framework treats mathematical entities as arrows between structures, emphasizing relationships over intrinsic properties and providing a unifying language for diverse fields like algebra and topology.[141] Foundational debates highlight challenges to naive set theory, such as Bertrand Russell's paradox from 1901, which arises in considering the set of all sets not containing themselves, leading to a self-referential contradiction and prompting the development of type theory to stratify sets and avoid such issues. Similarly, the Church-Turing thesis, proposed independently by Alonzo Church in 1936 via lambda-definability and by Alan Turing in his 1936 paper on computable numbers, posits that the effectively computable functions are precisely those definable by Turing machines, linking axiomatic foundations to the limits of mechanical computation.[124]Rigor and Intuition
In the history of mathematics, the pursuit of rigor has evolved significantly, transitioning from largely intuitive methods in pre-19th century geometry to formalized definitions in analysis. Ancient works like Euclid's Elements (circa 300 BCE) exemplified intuitive rigor through geometric diagrams and axiomatic deductions, where continuity and limits were assumed via visual appeal rather than precise quantification, allowing proofs to rely on spatial intuition without explicit handling of infinitesimals.[142] This approach, while groundbreaking for its logical structure, exposed gaps when applied to calculus, as seen in the paradoxes of Zeno and the informal infinitesimals of Newton and Leibniz. By the mid-19th century, Karl Weierstrass addressed these by introducing the epsilon-delta (ε-δ) definition of limits in his 1861 lectures, which rigorously specifies that for every ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that if 0 < |x - a| < δ, then |f(x) - L| < ε, thereby eliminating intuitive ambiguities and founding modern real analysis on arithmetic precision.[143] Intuition, however, remains indispensable for mathematical discovery, often preceding rigorous proof. In his 1908 essay "Mathematical Creation," Henri Poincaré described the subconscious processes underlying invention, where conscious effort yields to an unconscious "incubation" phase, followed by sudden illumination that reveals solutions, as in his breakthrough on Fuchsian functions during a bus ride in Coutances.[144] Building on this, Jacques Hadamard in The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (1945) outlined four stages of creative thinking: preparation (conscious analysis of the problem), incubation (unconscious processing), illumination (the "aha" moment), and verification (rigorous proof), drawing from introspections of mathematicians like Poincaré and emphasizing intuition's role in navigating vast conceptual spaces before formalization.[145] These accounts highlight how intuition acts as a heuristic guide, enabling leaps that rigor alone cannot achieve. Aesthetic criteria further bridge rigor and intuition, with mathematicians valuing elegance, simplicity, and symmetry in proofs and structures as markers of truth. Euler's identity, , is frequently cited for its beauty, linking five fundamental constants—e, i, π, 1, and 0—in a compact, unexpected relation that reveals deep symmetries between exponential and trigonometric functions.[146] A 1988 poll in The Mathematical Intelligencer ranked it the most beautiful theorem, underscoring how such elegance not only satisfies intellectual curiosity but also inspires intuitive insights into underlying patterns, as seen in symmetric group structures or invariant theorems.[147] Proofs deemed elegant, like those minimizing steps while maximizing generality, evoke a sense of harmony, reinforcing intuition's alignment with rigorous outcomes. Challenges arise when rigor and intuition conflict, particularly with non-constructive proofs that assert existence without providing constructions. Proofs by contradiction, such as assuming the non-existence of a maximum matching in a bipartite graph and deriving a contradiction via Hall's theorem, establish existence intuitively appealing yet non-constructively, raising concerns about their validity in finitistic settings. L.E.J. Brouwer's intuitionism (early 20th century) rejected such methods, insisting on constructive proofs that explicitly build objects, thereby denying the law of excluded middle for infinite domains and prioritizing mental intuition over abstract existence claims.[136] This stance critiques classical mathematics for over-relying on non-intuitive logic, advocating instead for a psychology-rooted foundation where truth emerges from temporal, constructive processes. Modern cognitive science reframes mathematical intuition as embodied and culturally shaped, challenging universalist views. George Lakoff and Rafael Núñez's Where Mathematics Comes From (2000) argues that abstract concepts arise from embodied metaphors grounded in physical experiences, such as arithmetic from object collection or infinity from motion, explaining why intuition feels innate yet varies across contexts.[148] Gender and cultural biases further influence intuitive access; studies show that stereotypes associating math with masculinity reduce girls' intuitive number sense performance, as early as ages 3–6, by triggering anxiety that disrupts spatial-numeric intuitions.[149] Similarly, cultural differences, like the Tsimane' people's approximate number system without exact words beyond 5, shape intuitive estimation and reasoning, highlighting how societal and linguistic environments bias mathematical cognition.[150]Mathematics in Science and Technology
Pure versus Applied Mathematics
Pure mathematics is the study of mathematical concepts independently of any applications outside of mathematics itself, focusing on abstract structures and theoretical developments driven by intrinsic curiosity and logical consistency.[151] For instance, number theory, which explores properties of integers and primes, was historically pursued for its own sake, as exemplified by Carl Friedrich Gauss's Disquisitiones Arithmeticae (1801), long before its role in modern cryptography emerged in the 1970s with algorithms like RSA.[152] A seminal illustration of this pure approach is David Hilbert's 1900 list of 23 problems, presented at the International Congress of Mathematicians, many of which—such as the continuum hypothesis (problem 1)—were addressed through abstract foundational work rather than immediate practical utility.[153] In contrast, applied mathematics employs mathematical tools and models to address real-world problems, integrating domain-specific knowledge from fields like physics or biology to formulate, analyze, and solve practical issues.[154] A classic example is the Malthusian model of population growth, introduced by Thomas Malthus in 1798 and formalized as the differential equation , where is the population size and is the intrinsic growth rate, capturing exponential increase under unlimited resources.[155] This approach prioritizes predictive power and empirical validation over purely theoretical elegance. The 19th century marked a dominance of pure mathematics, particularly through the rigorous foundations of analysis established by Karl Weierstrass, who emphasized epsilon-delta definitions of limits and continuity to eliminate intuitive gaps in calculus, influencing the Berlin school's focus on abstraction.[142] However, the 20th century saw a surge in applied mathematics, propelled by World War II demands for operations research, where mathematical modeling optimized military logistics, radar deployment, and resource allocation; John von Neumann contributed significantly through game theory and computing advancements that supported these efforts.[156][157] Despite the distinction, pure and applied mathematics often interconnect, with abstract theories finding unforeseen applications; for example, group theory, developed in the 19th century for algebraic structures, became essential in particle physics after the 1950s, underpinning symmetry classifications in quantum chromodynamics via SU(3) representations that explain quark interactions.[158] In contemporary contexts, the boundaries have blurred further through data-driven approaches like topological data analysis (TDA), which emerged prominently in the 2010s to extract persistent features from complex datasets using persistent homology, bridging algebraic topology with machine learning applications in neuroscience and materials science.[159] Additionally, applied mathematics now grapples with ethical challenges, such as algorithmic bias in decision-making systems, where flawed models can perpetuate societal inequalities, necessitating fairness audits and diverse data practices to mitigate discriminatory outcomes.[160]Applications in Physics
Mathematics provides the foundational language for modeling and predicting physical phenomena, enabling the formulation of laws that govern the universe from the macroscopic to the quantum scale. In classical mechanics, Isaac Newton's three laws of motion, articulated in his 1687 work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, form the cornerstone of deterministic descriptions of motion. The second law, expressed as , relates force to the product of mass and acceleration, allowing precise calculations of trajectories under gravitational and other influences.[161] A more advanced mathematical framework emerged with Lagrangian mechanics, developed by Joseph-Louis Lagrange in his 1788 treatise Mécanique Analytique. Here, the Lagrangian function is defined as , where is kinetic energy and is potential energy. The dynamics are governed by the Euler-Lagrange equations, , for generalized coordinates . This variational approach reformulates Newton's laws using calculus of variations, facilitating solutions for complex systems like pendulums and celestial orbits.[162] In electromagnetism, James Clerk Maxwell unified electricity and magnetism through four partial differential equations published in his 1865 paper "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field." These include Gauss's law for electricity, , and Faraday's law, , alongside the magnetic Gauss and Ampère-Maxwell laws. Vector calculus, particularly the divergence and curl operators, is indispensable for deriving wave equations that predict electromagnetic radiation, such as light propagating at speed .[163] Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity, introduced in his 1905 paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," revolutionized kinematics by positing that the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames. Key mathematical elements include the Lorentz transformations, and , where , which preserve spacetime intervals. This leads to the mass-energy equivalence , derived from the relativistic energy-momentum relation.[164] General relativity, finalized in Einstein's 1915 paper "The Field Equations of Gravitation," extends this to curved spacetime, describing gravity as geometry. The Einstein field equations, , link the Ricci tensor , scalar curvature , metric tensor , and stress-energy tensor . The Riemann curvature tensor underpins this, enabling predictions like black holes and gravitational waves.[165] Quantum mechanics employs infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces to represent states as vectors, with observables as operators, providing the mathematical structure for wave functions. Erwin Schrödinger's 1926 paper "An Undulatory Theory of the Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules" introduced the time-dependent equation , where is the Hamiltonian operator, governing the evolution of the wave function . Complementing this, Werner Heisenberg's 1927 uncertainty principle, , quantifies the inherent limits on simultaneous measurements of position and momentum, derived from non-commuting operators.[166] In quantum field theory, Richard Feynman's 1948 formulation uses path integrals to compute transition amplitudes by summing over all possible particle paths, weighted by , where is the action. This perturbative approach, detailed in "Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics," facilitates calculations of scattering processes and underpins the Standard Model. More recently, string theory posits fundamental particles as vibrating strings in higher dimensions, with compactified extra dimensions often modeled as Calabi-Yau manifolds to preserve supersymmetry. Seminal work by Philip Candelas, Gary Horowitz, Andrew Strominger, and Edward Witten in their 1985 paper "Vacuum Configurations for Superstrings" demonstrated how these six-dimensional Ricci-flat Kähler manifolds yield realistic particle spectra, including three generations of fermions.[167] The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in physics, as Eugene Wigner remarked in 1960, underscores how abstract structures like these unexpectedly align with empirical reality.Applications in Computing and Engineering
Mathematics plays a foundational role in computing and engineering by providing the theoretical underpinnings for algorithms, data structures, and system designs that enable efficient processing, reliable transmission, and optimized control of information and physical systems. In computer science, concepts from discrete mathematics and logic form the basis for analyzing computational complexity and ensuring the correctness of software. Engineering applications leverage continuous mathematics, such as transforms and differential equations, to model and stabilize dynamic systems, from electrical circuits to robotic controls. These mathematical tools not only drive innovation in digital technologies but also underpin standards that ensure interoperability and security across industries.Algorithms and Complexity
The study of algorithms in computing relies heavily on mathematical models of computation, such as Turing machines, which formalize the notion of algorithmic processes as sequences of discrete steps on an infinite tape. Introduced by Alan Turing in 1936, the Turing machine provides a universal framework for understanding what problems are computable and serves as the basis for modern computer architecture and programming languages. Complexity theory, a branch of mathematics, classifies problems based on the resources required to solve them, distinguishing between tractable (polynomial-time) and intractable problems. A seminal contribution is the concept of NP-completeness, defined by Stephen Cook in 1971, which identifies a class of decision problems where solutions can be verified quickly but finding them may be computationally hard; the satisfiability problem (SAT) was the first proven NP-complete problem. The P versus NP problem, one of the Millennium Prize Problems posed by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000, asks whether every problem whose solution can be verified in polynomial time (NP) can also be solved in polynomial time (P); resolving it would profoundly impact fields like optimization and cryptography by clarifying the boundaries of efficient computation. These mathematical frameworks guide the design of data structures, such as balanced binary search trees and hash tables, ensuring scalability in software systems handling vast datasets, as seen in databases and search engines.Coding Theory
Coding theory applies combinatorial mathematics to ensure reliable data transmission over noisy channels, a critical need in digital communications and storage. Error-correcting codes detect and correct transmission errors using redundancy; the Hamming distance, defined as the number of positions at which two strings differ, quantifies the minimum separation required for error detection and correction. Richard Hamming introduced the Hamming code in 1950, a linear error-correcting code capable of detecting up to two errors and correcting one in binary data blocks, which became foundational for early computer memory systems like RAM. More advanced codes, such as Reed-Solomon codes developed by Irving Reed and Gustave Solomon in 1960, use finite field arithmetic to correct multiple symbol errors and are widely employed in practical applications, including error correction on compact discs (CDs) and DVDs, where they recover data from scratches or defects by encoding information with polynomial redundancy. These codes, grounded in algebraic geometry and number theory, achieve near-optimal efficiency as predicted by Claude Shannon's 1948 noisy-channel coding theorem, which mathematically establishes the maximum rate at which information can be transmitted reliably.Control Theory
Control theory in engineering uses differential equations and linear algebra to design systems that maintain desired behaviors despite disturbances, such as in autopilot systems for aircraft or temperature regulation in manufacturing. Feedback loops, modeled mathematically as closed systems where output influences input, ensure stability and performance; the Laplace transform converts time-domain differential equations into the s-domain for algebraic analysis. The transform is defined as , enabling frequency-domain techniques to assess system response. Stability analysis relies on criteria like the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, developed by Edward Routh in 1877 and Adolf Hurwitz in 1895, which determines whether all roots of a polynomial characteristic equation have negative real parts without solving for them explicitly—essential for ensuring oscillatory-free responses in feedback systems. Applied in electrical and mechanical engineering, these tools optimize controllers in real-time systems, reducing energy consumption and improving precision in applications from robotics to power grids.Signal Processing
Signal processing transforms and analyzes waveforms using integral transforms to extract features or compress data, vital for telecommunications and multimedia. The Fourier transform decomposes signals into frequency components, given by , allowing engineers to filter noise or identify patterns in audio, radar, and seismic data. In digital imaging, the discrete cosine transform (DCT) approximates the continuous Fourier transform for finite sequences and is central to the JPEG compression standard, where an 8x8 block DCT concentrates energy into low frequencies for efficient encoding with minimal perceptual loss. Developed by Nasir Ahmed, T. Natarajan, and K. R. Rao in 1974, the DCT reduces file sizes by up to 10:1 in JPEG images while preserving quality, underpinning web graphics and digital photography.Recent Engineering Applications
Optimization mathematics drives advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly through backpropagation, an algorithm for training neural networks by computing gradients of a loss function via the chain rule. Introduced by David Rumelhart, Geoffrey Hinton, and Ronald Williams in 1986, backpropagation enables efficient learning in deep networks, revolutionizing machine learning for tasks like image recognition and natural language processing. In cybersecurity, elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) leverages the algebraic structure of elliptic curves over finite fields to provide secure key exchanges with smaller key sizes than traditional RSA, enhancing efficiency on resource-constrained devices. Standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in 2000 through FIPS 186-2, ECC underpins protocols like TLS for secure web communications and is resistant to quantum attacks when paired with appropriate curves.Applications in Biological and Social Sciences
Mathematics has profoundly influenced the biological sciences by providing frameworks to model complex interactions and dynamics in living systems. In population biology, the Lotka-Volterra equations capture predator-prey relationships through a system of ordinary differential equations. Let denote the prey population and the predator population at time ; the model is given by where is the prey growth rate, the predation rate, the predator death rate, and the predator growth efficiency from prey consumption. These equations, independently derived by Alfred J. Lotka in 1925 and Vito Volterra in 1926, yield periodic oscillations that reflect natural cycles observed in ecosystems, such as those in fish populations in the Adriatic Sea studied by Volterra.[168] Epidemiological modeling relies on compartmental approaches like the SIR model to simulate infectious disease propagation. The population is partitioned into susceptible (), infected (), and recovered () individuals, with total population assumed constant. The dynamics follow where is the effective contact rate and the recovery rate. Originating from the work of W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick in 1927, this framework predicts epidemic thresholds based on the basic reproduction number and has informed responses to outbreaks like influenza and COVID-19.[169] In chemical and biochemical contexts, reaction kinetics employs rate laws to quantify enzyme-substrate interactions, as in the Michaelis-Menten model. The reaction velocity is expressed as where is substrate concentration, the maximum velocity, and the Michaelis constant, derived from . Formulated by Leonor Michaelis and Maud Menten in 1913 through experiments on invertase, this hyperbolic relationship underpins enzyme assays and drug design in pharmacology.[170] Economic applications leverage game theory to analyze strategic interactions. The Nash equilibrium, a cornerstone concept, occurs in a non-cooperative game when each player's strategy is optimal given others' strategies, meaning no unilateral deviation improves payoff. John F. Nash Jr. introduced this in 1950 for n-person games, proving existence under continuity and quasi-concavity assumptions, which has shaped auction design and oligopoly modeling.[171] The prisoner's dilemma illustrates conflict between individual and collective rationality via a 2x2 payoff matrix, where mutual defection yields inferior outcomes compared to cooperation, despite defection dominating. Developed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher in 1950 at RAND Corporation and formalized by Albert W. Tucker, it exemplifies applications in international relations and evolutionary biology.[172] Linear programming optimizes resource allocation subject to linear constraints, solved via the simplex method. George B. Dantzig formulated this in 1947 for U.S. Air Force logistics, with the algorithm enabling efficient computation of maxima like production schedules under scarcity. Social sciences employ network theory to map relational structures, revealing phenomena like the small-world effect, where networks balance high clustering and short path lengths. The Watts-Strogatz model interpolates between regular lattices and random graphs by rewiring edges with probability , yielding average path lengths scaling as for nodes while preserving local clustering. Proposed by Duncan J. Watts and Steven H. Strogatz in 1998, it explains efficient information flow in social ties, from acquaintance networks to neural systems.[173] The Bass model combines external influence and internal imitation, with the cumulative fraction of adopters satisfying where is the coefficient of innovation and the coefficient of imitation. Frank M. Bass developed this in 1969 to forecast durable goods sales like color televisions.[174] Recent advances integrate mathematics with biology through bioinformatics, exemplified by sequence alignment algorithms. The BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) rapidly identifies similar regions between DNA or protein sequences using heuristic local alignments that approximate optimal scores via word matches and extensions. Introduced by Stephen F. Altschul and colleagues in 1990, BLAST revolutionized genomic database searches, enabling discoveries in gene function and evolution.[175] In socio-economic modeling, integrated assessment models like DICE couple climate dynamics with economic growth to evaluate policy trade-offs. William D. Nordhaus's DICE, first presented in 1992, optimizes carbon emissions paths by balancing abatement costs against damage from temperature rise, informing global agreements like the Paris Accord through updates incorporating updated climate sensitivities.[176]Education and Professional Practice
Mathematical Education
Mathematical education encompasses the structured teaching and learning of mathematics across various levels, from primary school through higher education, with curricula designed to build foundational skills and advanced reasoning progressively. In K-12 settings, instruction typically begins with arithmetic basics in early grades, such as counting, addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, to develop number sense and computational fluency. As students advance to middle school, the curriculum shifts toward algebra, introducing variables, equations, and functions to model relationships, followed by geometry in high school, where proofs emphasize logical deduction and spatial reasoning. This progression aligns with standards like the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, adopted in the United States in 2010, which prioritize conceptual understanding over rote memorization by connecting topics such as place value and algebraic structure across grades. At the university level, mathematics education transitions to more rigorous, proof-based courses that cultivate abstract thinking and formal argumentation, essential for both pure and applied mathematics majors. Pure mathematics programs focus on theoretical foundations, such as real analysis and abstract algebra, requiring students to construct and verify proofs independently.[177] Applied mathematics majors, while emphasizing practical applications in areas like differential equations and numerical methods, also incorporate proof-based elements to ensure a deep grasp of underlying principles, often through courses like linear algebra and probability.[178] A significant challenge in higher education is math anxiety, which affects approximately 20-30% of students and can hinder performance and persistence in mathematics courses, as evidenced by surveys of adolescents and undergraduates.[179][180] Pedagogical approaches in mathematical education have evolved to promote active engagement and deeper comprehension. The Moore method, an inquiry-based learning strategy developed by R.L. Moore, encourages students to discover theorems through independent exploration and presentation, fostering self-reliance without reliance on textbooks.[181] Since the early 2000s, technology integration has enhanced these methods, with tools like GeoGebra enabling dynamic visualizations of geometric constructions and algebraic manipulations, thereby supporting conceptual exploration and problem-solving in classrooms.[182] Globally, mathematical education varies by region, as highlighted by international assessments like the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), where Singapore's students achieved the highest mathematics scores in 2018, surpassing the OECD average by over 80 points and demonstrating strong proficiency in applying mathematical concepts.[183] Gender gaps in mathematics performance, once pronounced, have narrowed significantly since 2010, with UNESCO reports indicating that girls' achievement in mathematics now equals or exceeds boys' in many countries, particularly at secondary levels, due to targeted interventions and reduced stereotypes.[184] Effective teacher training is crucial for successful mathematical education, emphasizing deep content knowledge alongside pedagogical strategies. Lee Shulman's 1986 framework introduced the concept of pedagogical content knowledge, which integrates subject expertise with methods to represent mathematical ideas accessibly, enabling teachers to address diverse student needs in topics like geometry and algebra.[185] This approach underscores that mere subject mastery is insufficient; teachers must transform content into instructional forms that build student understanding progressively.Research and Careers in Mathematics
Mathematical research typically begins with the formulation of conjectures based on patterns observed in existing data or theorems, followed by attempts to prove or disprove them through rigorous logical deduction. Collaboration has become increasingly important, exemplified by the Polymath projects initiated in 2009 by mathematician Timothy Gowers, which leverage online platforms for massive, distributed problem-solving efforts among global experts.[186] These projects have successfully resolved longstanding problems, such as the Erdős discrepancy problem in 2015. Peer-reviewed publication remains the cornerstone of validation, with prestigious journals like the Annals of Mathematics employing a rigorous, anonymous referee process where submissions undergo detailed scrutiny by specialists before acceptance.[187] Career paths for mathematicians span academia, industry, and government, often requiring a PhD for advanced roles. In academia, tenure-track positions involve securing grants, such as those from the National Science Foundation's Division of Mathematical Sciences, which funded over $200 million in mathematical research in fiscal year 2024 to support theoretical and applied investigations.[188] Industry opportunities include quantitative finance, where mathematicians develop models for risk assessment and trading algorithms at firms like JPMorgan Chase, drawing on stochastic processes and optimization.[189] Tech giants like Google employ mathematicians in research divisions to advance algorithms in machine learning and data analysis.[190] Government roles, such as cryptanalysts at the National Security Agency, focus on breaking encryption and designing secure systems, requiring expertise in number theory and computational complexity.[191] Essential skills for modern mathematicians extend beyond pure theory to include programming proficiency in languages like Python for data manipulation and machine learning implementations, and MATLAB for numerical simulations and matrix computations.[192] Interdisciplinary collaboration, particularly with artificial intelligence, has surged since 2020, driven by AI's reliance on mathematical foundations like linear algebra and probability, as seen in initiatives like Google DeepMind's AI for Math program launched in 2025.[193] Despite these opportunities, the field faces diversity challenges, with women comprising approximately 30% of new U.S. mathematics PhDs as of recent years, according to data from the American Institute of Mathematics.[194] Underrepresentation of minorities persists, alongside work-life balance issues in academia's "publish or perish" culture, where tenure decisions heavily weigh publication records, leading to high stress and burnout risks.[195] Emerging careers highlight mathematics' versatility, such as data scientist roles, with a U.S. median salary of $112,590 in 2024 per the Bureau of Labor Statistics, projected to grow with demand in analytics. Actuarial science offers another path, requiring passage of exams administered by the Society of Actuaries, including Probability (Exam P) and Financial Mathematics (Exam FM), to certify professionals in risk modeling for insurance and pensions.[196]Cultural and Societal Impact
Mathematics in Art and Literature
Mathematics has profoundly influenced visual arts through concepts like symmetry and proportion, manifesting in intricate patterns that evoke aesthetic harmony. In the 20th century, Dutch artist M.C. Escher drew inspiration from mathematician H.S.M. Coxeter's work on symmetry groups, particularly Coxeter groups, to create tessellations that explore hyperbolic geometry and impossible realities. Beginning in the 1930s and intensifying in the 1950s after Escher's 1954 correspondence with Coxeter, these prints, such as Circle Limit IV (1960), depict repeating motifs that tile non-Euclidean spaces, blending artistic illusion with rigorous mathematical structure.[197][198] The golden ratio, denoted as , has been associated with ideal proportions in Renaissance art, symbolizing concepts derived from ancient Greek mathematics and rediscovered in the 15th century. However, claims of its deliberate and precise use in works such as Leonardo da Vinci's Vitruvian Man (c. 1490) are common misconceptions; the figure illustrates Vitruvius's principles of human symmetry but does not align with φ-based ratios.[199] In architecture, mathematical patterns extend to both historical and modern expressions, often mirroring natural forms. Benoit Mandelbrot's introduction of fractals in The Fractal Geometry of Nature (1982) revolutionized the perception of irregular, self-similar structures in art and architecture, such as the intricate branching of trees or coastlines, inspiring designers to replicate these infinite complexities in built environments like Zaha Hadid's fluid forms.[200] Islamic architecture from the 15th century employed girih tiles—sets of five geometric shapes including decagons and pentagons—to generate quasi-periodic patterns with decagonal symmetry, as evidenced in the Darb-i Imam shrine in Isfahan, Iran, where these tiles facilitated complex, non-repeating tilings predating modern quasicrystal discoveries.[201] Literature has long engaged with mathematical abstractions, particularly infinity, to probe existential themes. Jorge Luis Borges's short story "The Library of Babel" (1941) envisions an infinite universe as a vast library of hexagonal rooms containing every possible book, drawing on combinatorial mathematics and Cantor's infinities to explore themes of order, chaos, and the search for meaning in boundless information.[202] In mathematical fiction, Grigori Perelman's proof of the Poincaré conjecture (2002–2003) has inspired narratives like Philippe Zaouati's Perelman's Refusal: A Novel (2021), which fictionalizes the reclusive mathematician's triumph and rejection of accolades, weaving topology's abstract spheres into a tale of genius and isolation.[203] Music composition has incorporated mathematical sequences and analysis to structure harmony and rhythm. Béla Bartók integrated the Fibonacci sequence—where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, ...), approximating the golden ratio—in works like Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta (1936), using proportions such as 34:55 bars to divide movements and create balanced, organic progressions reflective of natural growth patterns.[204][205] Fourier analysis, developed by Joseph Fourier in the early 19th century, underpins the decomposition of musical tones into harmonic sine waves, enabling composers and engineers to synthesize sounds by summing frequencies that produce overtones, as seen in digital music production where spectral analysis reveals the timbral essence of instruments.[206] In modern digital art, algorithmic generation has democratized mathematical creativity, particularly through non-fungible tokens (NFTs) since 2021. The Processing programming language, launched in 2001 by Casey Reas and Ben Fry, empowers artists to code dynamic visuals using loops, fractals, and procedural rules, fostering interactive pieces that evolve via mathematical algorithms.[207] Post-2021, NFT platforms like Art Blocks have popularized generative art collections, such as Chromie Squiggle (2021), where blockchain-minted tokens utilize pseudorandom algorithms and geometric patterns—including fractals and symmetry—to produce unique, mathematically derived images, transforming code into collectible, ownership-verified artworks.[208][209]Popularization and Public Perception
Efforts to popularize mathematics have long included influential books that make complex ideas accessible to general audiences. G.H. Hardy's A Mathematician's Apology (1940) defends the value of pure mathematics as an aesthetic pursuit, arguing that its beauty justifies its existence independent of practical applications, and remains a seminal text in shaping public appreciation for abstract mathematical thought.[210] Douglas Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (1979), a Pulitzer Prize-winning work, intertwines mathematics, art, and music to explore self-reference and consciousness, earning acclaim as a cornerstone of popular science literature for its engaging analogies and interdisciplinary insights.[211] Robert Kanigel's The Man Who Knew Infinity (1991) chronicles the life of Srinivasa Ramanujan, highlighting his intuitive genius and collaboration with G.H. Hardy, and has inspired widespread interest in non-Western mathematical contributions through its narrative of perseverance and discovery.[212] Media representations have further broadened mathematics' appeal by portraying mathematicians as relatable figures. The 2001 film A Beautiful Mind, based on John Nash's life, dramatizes his game theory breakthroughs and struggles with schizophrenia, introducing concepts like Nash equilibrium to millions and sparking public curiosity about mathematical innovation despite some dramatized inaccuracies.[213] The television series Numb3rs (2005–2010) featured an FBI agent consulting his mathematician brother to solve crimes using real mathematical techniques, such as graph theory and cryptography, and promoted educational outreach through accompanying lesson plans developed with institutions like Texas Instruments and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.[214] Online platforms have amplified this trend, with YouTube channel 3Blue1Brown, launched in 2015 by Grant Sanderson, using custom animations to visualize topics like linear algebra and neural networks, amassing over 6 million subscribers and transforming abstract proofs into intuitive narratives.[215] Public perception of mathematics often includes stereotypes portraying it as inherently difficult and male-dominated, which can deter participation, particularly among women and underrepresented groups. A 2023 study found that stereotypical gender role views significantly influence students' mathematical self-efficacy, with girls facing heightened pressure from beliefs that math favors innate male aptitude.[216] Surveys indicate that around 60% of respondents associate math with challenge and anxiety, reinforcing barriers to engagement. Countering these views, initiatives like Mathematics Awareness Month, established in the U.S. in 1986 as a week and expanded to a full month by the 1990s through the Joint Policy Board for Mathematics, promote public events, resources, and media campaigns to highlight math's relevance and accessibility.[217] Outreach programs extend popularization beyond books and screens via interactive experiences and competitions. The National Museum of Mathematics (MoMath) in New York City, opened in 2012, offers hands-on exhibits on geometry, probability, and fractals, has welcomed over 1.2 million visitors since its opening, including more than 300,000 students, and fosters family engagement through workshops and school partnerships.[218][219] International competitions like the Mathematical Olympiad, held annually since 1959, engage high school students worldwide in problem-solving challenges, inspiring passion for mathematics and identifying talent while garnering media attention that demystifies advanced topics.[220] Recent trends reflect digital evolution in mathematical outreach, with short-form videos gaining traction post-2020. TikTok creators have produced viral explainers on concepts like the Pythagorean theorem using animations and humor, reaching millions of views and appealing to younger audiences amid the platform's surge in educational content during the pandemic.[221] Debates on artificial intelligence's role have intensified, with 2024 discussions questioning whether AI tools like large language models could supplant human mathematicians, though experts emphasize AI's limitations in creative proof generation and its potential as a collaborative aid rather than a replacement.[222]Major Awards and Unsolved Problems
Mathematics recognizes exceptional contributions through several prestigious awards, often likened to the Nobel Prize for their impact on the field. The Fields Medal, established in 1936 by the International Mathematical Union (IMU), is awarded every four years during the International Congress of Mathematicians to up to four mathematicians under the age of 40 for outstanding achievements in mathematics and the promise of future work.[223] Often called the "Nobel of mathematics," it highlights early-career breakthroughs; for instance, Maryam Mirzakhani received the 2014 Fields Medal for her outstanding contributions to the dynamics and geometry of Riemann surfaces and their moduli spaces.[224] Complementing the Fields Medal, the Abel Prize, founded in 2003 by the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters and funded by the Norwegian government, is awarded annually to honor lifetime achievements in mathematics, with no age restriction. Valued at approximately 7.5 million Norwegian kroner (about $700,000 USD), it recognizes profound and lasting impact; Andrew Wiles was awarded the 2016 Abel Prize for his stunning proof of Fermat's Last Theorem through the modularity conjecture for elliptic curves.[225] Other notable awards include the Wolf Prize in Mathematics, instituted in 1978 by the Wolf Foundation in Israel, which annually recognizes outstanding mathematicians for achievements that significantly advance the field, often shared among multiple recipients.[226] The Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics, launched in 2015 by philanthropists including Yuri Milner, awards $3 million to individuals for profound contributions across mathematical branches, emphasizing transformative advances.[227] Unsolved problems in mathematics drive much of the field's research, with the Millennium Prize Problems standing as a landmark challenge. In 2000, the Clay Mathematics Institute announced seven problems, offering $1 million for each solution, to highlight profound open questions at the millennium's turn: the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, the Hodge Conjecture, the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness, P versus NP, the Poincaré Conjecture, the Riemann Hypothesis, and the Yang-Mills existence and mass gap.[228] The Poincaré Conjecture was solved by Grigori Perelman in 2002–2003 through his work on Ricci flow with surgery, verified by the mathematical community by 2006; he was awarded the Millennium Prize in 2010 but declined it, citing concerns over the process and ethics in mathematics. Beyond the Millennium Problems, longstanding conjectures continue to captivate researchers. The Collatz conjecture, proposed by Lothar Collatz in 1937, posits that for any positive integer n, repeatedly applying the rule—if n is even, divide by 2; if odd, replace with 3n + 1—will eventually reach 1, a simple yet unproven statement verified computationally for enormous numbers but resistant to general proof.[229] The twin prime conjecture asserts that there are infinitely many pairs of primes differing by 2, such as (3,5) and (11,13), with recent progress showing bounded gaps between primes but the exact twin case remaining open, supported by asymptotic density estimates suggesting such pairs occur with positive frequency.[230] These unsolved problems profoundly influence funding, careers, and research directions in mathematics. For example, the Hodge Conjecture, concerning the intersection theory of algebraic cycles on projective varieties, has spurred dedicated grants and positions, as seen in the Clay Institute's ongoing $1 million prize; in the 2020s, AI-driven computational searches have generated candidate counterexamples, accelerating exploration and attracting interdisciplinary funding from initiatives like the AI for Math Fund, which awarded $18 million in 2025 grants for AI tools tackling such challenges, thereby shaping emerging careers at the intersection of mathematics and machine learning.[231]References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Translation:The_Field_Equations_of_Gravitation
