Hubbry Logo
John Archibald WheelerJohn Archibald WheelerMain
Open search
John Archibald Wheeler
Community hub
John Archibald Wheeler
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
John Archibald Wheeler
John Archibald Wheeler
John Archibald Wheeler
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

John Archibald Wheeler (July 9, 1911 – April 13, 2008) was an American theoretical physicist. He was largely responsible for reviving interest in general relativity in the United States after World War II. Wheeler also worked with Niels Bohr to explain the basic principles of nuclear fission. Together with Gregory Breit, Wheeler developed the concept of the Breit–Wheeler process. He is best known for popularizing the term "black hole"[1] for objects with gravitational collapse already predicted during the early 20th century, for inventing the terms "quantum foam", "neutron moderator", "wormhole" and "it from bit",[2] and for hypothesizing the "one-electron universe". Stephen Hawking called Wheeler the "hero of the black hole story".[3]

Key Information

At 21, Wheeler earned his doctorate at Johns Hopkins University under the supervision of Karl Herzfeld. He studied under Breit and Bohr on a National Research Council fellowship. In 1939 he collaborated with Bohr on a series of papers using the liquid drop model to explain the mechanism of fission. During World War II, he worked with the Manhattan Project's Metallurgical Laboratory in Chicago, where he helped design nuclear reactors, and then at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, where he helped DuPont build them. He returned to Princeton after the war but returned to government service to help design and build the hydrogen bomb in the early 1950s. He and Edward Teller were the main civilian proponents of thermonuclear weapons.[4]

For most of his career, Wheeler was a professor of physics at Princeton University, which he joined in 1938, remaining until 1976. At Princeton he supervised 46 PhD students, more than any other physics professor.

Wheeler left Princeton at the age of 65. He was appointed director of the Center for Theoretical Physics at the University of Texas at Austin in 1976 and remained in the position until 1986, when he retired and became a professor emeritus.

Early life and education

[edit]

Wheeler was born in Jacksonville, Florida, on July 9, 1911, to librarians Joseph L. Wheeler and Mabel Archibald (Archie) Wheeler.[5] He was the oldest of four children. His brother Joseph earned a PhD from Brown University and a Master of Library Science from Columbia University. His brother Robert earned a PhD in geology from Harvard University and worked as a geologist for oil companies and several colleges. His sister Mary studied library science at the University of Denver and became a librarian.[6] They grew up in Youngstown, Ohio, but spent a year in 1921 to 1922 on a farm in Benson, Vermont, where Wheeler attended a one-room school. When they returned to Youngstown he attended Rayen High School.[7]

After graduating from Baltimore City College high school in 1926,[8] Wheeler entered Johns Hopkins University with a scholarship from the state of Maryland.[9] He published his first scientific paper in 1930, as part of a summer job at the National Bureau of Standards.[10] He earned his doctorate in 1933. His dissertation research work, carried out under the supervision of Karl Herzfeld, was on the "Theory of the Dispersion and Absorption of Helium".[11] He received a National Research Council fellowship, which he used to study under Gregory Breit at New York University in 1933 and 1934,[12] and then in Copenhagen under Niels Bohr in 1934 and 1935.[13] In a 1934 paper, Breit and Wheeler introduced the Breit–Wheeler process, a mechanism by which photons can be potentially transformed into matter in the form of electron–positron pairs.[9][14]

Early career

[edit]

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill made Wheeler an associate professor in 1937, but he wanted to be able to work more closely with experts in particle physics.[15] He turned down an offer in 1938 of an associate professorship at Johns Hopkins University in favor of an assistant professorship at Princeton University. Although it was a lesser position, he felt that Princeton, which was building up its physics department, was a better career choice.[16] He remained a member of its faculty until 1976.[17]

In his 1937 paper "On the Mathematical Description of Light Nuclei by the Method of Resonating Group Structure", Wheeler introduced the S-matrix—short for scattering matrix—"a unitary matrix of coefficients connecting the asymptotic behavior of an arbitrary particular solution [of the integral equations] with that of solutions of a standard form".[18][19] Wheeler did not pursue this idea, but in the 1940s Werner Heisenberg developed the idea of the S-matrix into an important tool in elementary particle physics.[18]

In 1938 Wheeler joined Edward Teller in examining Bohr's liquid drop model of the atomic nucleus;[20] they presented their results at a meeting of the American Physical Society in New York. Wheeler's Chapel Hill graduate student Katharine Way also presented a paper, which she followed up in a subsequent article, detailing how the liquid drop model was unstable under certain conditions. Due to a limitation of the liquid drop model, they all missed the opportunity to predict nuclear fission.[21][22] In 1939, Bohr brought the news of Lise Meitner's and Otto Frisch's discovery of fission to America. Bohr told Leon Rosenfeld, who informed Wheeler.[16]

Bohr and Wheeler set to work applying the liquid drop model to explain the mechanism of nuclear fission.[23] As the experimental physicists studied fission, they uncovered puzzling results. George Placzek asked Bohr why uranium seemed to fission with both very fast and very slow neutrons. Walking to a meeting with Wheeler, Bohr had an insight that fission at low energies was due to the uranium-235 isotope, while at high energies it was mainly due to the far more abundant uranium-238 isotope.[24] They co-wrote two more papers on fission.[25][26] Their first paper appeared in Physical Review on September 1, 1939, the day Germany invaded Poland, starting World War II.[27]

Considering the notion that positrons were electrons traveling backward in time, in 1940 Wheeler conceived his one-electron universe postulate: that there was in fact only one electron, bouncing back and forth in time. His graduate student Richard Feynman found this hard to believe, but the idea that positrons were electrons traveling backward in time intrigued him, and Feynman incorporated the notion of the reversibility of time in his Feynman diagrams.[28]

Nuclear weapons

[edit]

Manhattan Project

[edit]

Soon after the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor brought the U.S. into World War II, Wheeler accepted a request from Arthur Compton to join the Manhattan Project's Metallurgical Laboratory at the University of Chicago. He moved there in January 1942,[27] joining Eugene Wigner's group, which was studying nuclear reactor design.[29] He co-wrote a paper with Robert F. Christy on "Chain Reaction of Pure Fissionable Materials in Solution", which was important in the plutonium purification process.[30] It was declassified in December 1955.[31] He gave the neutron moderator its name, replacing Enrico Fermi's term, "slower downer".[32][33]

Loading tubes of the Hanford B Reactor

After the United States Army Corps of Engineers took over the Manhattan Project, it gave DuPont responsibility for the detailed design and construction of the reactors.[34] Wheeler became part of DuPont's design staff.[35] He worked closely with its engineers, commuting between Chicago and Wilmington, Delaware, where DuPont had its headquarters. He moved his family to Wilmington in March 1943.[36] DuPont's task was to build not just nuclear reactors, but an entire plutonium production complex at the Hanford Site in Washington.[37] As work progressed, Wheeler relocated his family again in July 1944, to Richland, Washington, where he worked in the scientific buildings known as the 300 area.[30][36]

Even before the Hanford Site started up the B Reactor, the first of its three reactors, on September 15, 1944, Wheeler had been concerned that some nuclear fission products might be nuclear poisons, the accumulation of which would impede the ongoing nuclear chain reaction by absorbing many of the thermal neutrons needed to continue a chain reaction.[38] In an April 1942 report, he predicted that this would reduce the reactivity by less than one percent so long as no fission product had a neutron capture cross section of more than 100,000 barns.[39] After the reactor unexpectedly shut down, and then just as unexpectedly restarted about 15 hours later, he suspected iodine-135, with a half-life of 6.6 hours, and its daughter product, xenon-135, which has a half-life of 9.2 hours. Xenon-135 turned out to have a neutron capture cross-section of well over two million barns. The problem was corrected by adding additional fuel slugs to burn out the poison.[40]

Wheeler had a personal reason for working on the Manhattan Project. His brother Joe, fighting in Italy, sent him a postcard with a simple message: "Hurry up".[41] It was already too late: Joe was killed in October 1944. "Here we were", Wheeler later wrote, "so close to creating a nuclear weapon to end the war. I couldn't stop thinking then, and haven't stopped thinking since, that the war could have been over in October 1944."[40] Joe left a widow and baby daughter, Mary Jo, who later married physicist James Hartle.[42]

Hydrogen bomb

[edit]

In August 1945 Wheeler and his family returned to Princeton, where he resumed his academic career.[43] Working with Feynman, he explored the possibility of physics with particles, but not fields, and carried out theoretical studies of the muon with Jayme Tiomno,[44] resulting in a series of papers on the topic,[45][46] including a 1949 paper in which Tiomno and Wheeler introduced the "Tiomno Triangle", which related different forms of radioactive decay.[47] He also suggested the use of muons as a nuclear probe. This paper, written and privately circulated in 1949 but not published until 1953,[48] resulted in a series of measurements of the Chang radiation emitted by muons. Muons are a component of cosmic rays, and Wheeler became the founder and first director of Princeton's Cosmic Rays Laboratory, which received a grant of $375,000 from the Office of Naval Research in 1948.[49] Wheeler received a Guggenheim Fellowship in 1946,[50] which allowed him to spend the 1949–50 academic year in Paris.[51]

The "Sausage" device of Ivy Mike nuclear test on Enewetak Atoll. The Sausage was the first true hydrogen bomb ever tested.

The 1949 detonation of Joe-1 by the Soviet Union prompted an all-out effort by the United States, led by Teller, to develop the more powerful hydrogen bomb in response. Henry D. Smyth, Wheeler's department head at Princeton, asked him to join the effort. Most physicists were, like Wheeler, trying to reestablish careers interrupted by the war and reluctant to face more disruption. Others had moral objections.[52] Those who agreed to participate included Emil Konopinski, Marshall Rosenbluth, Lothar Nordheim, and Charles Critchfield, but there was also now a body of experienced weapons physicists at the Los Alamos Laboratory, led by Norris Bradbury.[53][54] Wheeler agreed to go to Los Alamos after a conversation with Bohr.[52] Two of his graduate students from Princeton, Ken Ford and John Toll, joined him there.[55]

At Los Alamos, Wheeler and his family moved into the house on "Bathtub Row" that Robert Oppenheimer and his family had occupied during the war.[56] In 1950 there was no practical design for a hydrogen bomb. Calculations by Stanisław Ulam and others showed that Teller's "Classical Super" would not work. Teller and Wheeler created a new design known as "Alarm Clock", but it was not a true thermonuclear weapon. Not until January 1951 did Ulam come up with a workable design.[57]

In 1951 Wheeler obtained Bradbury's permission to set up a branch office of the Los Alamos laboratory at Princeton, known as Project Matterhorn, which had two parts. Matterhorn S (for stellarator, another name coined by Wheeler), under Lyman Spitzer, investigated nuclear fusion as a power source. Matterhorn B (for bomb), under Wheeler, did nuclear weapons research. Senior scientists remained uninterested and aloof from the project, so he staffed it with young graduate and postdoctoral students.[58] Matterhorn B's efforts were crowned by the success of the Ivy Mike nuclear test at Enewetak Atoll in the Pacific, on November 1, 1952,[59][58] which Wheeler witnessed. The yield of the Ivy Mike "Sausage" device was reckoned at 10.4 megatons of TNT (44 PJ), about 30 percent higher than Matterhorn B had estimated.[60]

In January 1953 Wheeler was involved in a security breach when he lost a highly classified paper on lithium-6 and the hydrogen bomb design during an overnight train trip.[61][62] This resulted in an official reprimand.[63]

Matterhorn B was discontinued, but Matterhorn S endures as the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.[58]

Later academic career

[edit]

After concluding his Matterhorn Project work, Wheeler resumed his academic career. In a 1955 paper, he theoretically investigated the geon, an electromagnetic or gravitational wave held together in a confined region by the attraction of its own field. He coined the name as a contraction of "gravitational electromagnetic entity".[64] He found that the smallest geon was a toroid the size of the Sun, but millions of times heavier. He later showed that geons are unstable, and would quickly self destruct if they were ever to form.[65]

Geometrodynamics

[edit]

During the 1950s, Wheeler formulated geometrodynamics, a program of physical and ontological reduction of every physical phenomenon, such as gravitation and electromagnetism, to the geometrical properties of a curved space-time. His research on the subject was published in 1957 and 1961.[66][67] Wheeler envisaged the fabric of the universe as a chaotic subatomic realm of quantum fluctuations, which he called "quantum foam".[64][68]

General relativity

[edit]

General relativity had been considered a less respectable field of physics, being detached from experiment. Wheeler was a key figure in its revival, leading the school at Princeton, while Dennis William Sciama and Yakov Borisovich Zel'dovich developed the subject at Cambridge University and the University of Moscow, respectively. Wheeler and his students made substantial contributions to the field during the Golden Age of General Relativity.[69]

While working on mathematical extensions to Einstein's general relativity in 1957, Wheeler introduced the concept and word wormhole to describe hypothetical "tunnels" in space-time. Bohr asked whether they were stable and further research by Wheeler determined that they are not.[70][71] His work in general relativity included the theory of gravitational collapse. He used the term black hole in 1967 during a talk he gave at the NASA Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS),[72] although the term had been used earlier in the decade.[a] Wheeler said the term was suggested to him during a lecture when a member of the audience was tired of hearing Wheeler say "gravitationally completely collapsed object". Wheeler was also a pioneer in the field of quantum gravity due to his development, with Bryce DeWitt, of the Wheeler–DeWitt equation in 1967.[74] Stephen Hawking later described Wheeler and DeWitt's work as the equation governing the "wave function of the Universe".[75]

Quantum information

[edit]

Wheeler left Princeton in 1976 at age 65. He was appointed director of the Center for Theoretical Physics at the University of Texas at Austin in 1976 and remained in the position until 1986, when he retired[17] and became a professor emeritus.[76] Misner, Thorne and Wojciech Zurek, all former students of Wheeler, wrote:

Looking back on Wheeler's 10 years at Texas, many quantum information scientists now regard him, along with IBM's Rolf Landauer, as a grandfather of their field. That, however, was not because Wheeler produced seminal research papers on quantum information. He did not—with one major exception, his delayed-choice experiment. Rather, his role was to inspire by asking deep questions from a radical conservative viewpoint and, through his questions, to stimulate others' research and discovery.[77]

Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment describes a family of thought experiments in quantum physics that he proposed, with the most prominent of them appearing in 1978 and 1984. These experiments seek to discover whether light somehow "senses" the experimental apparatus that it travels through in the double-slit experiment, adjusting its behavior to fit by assuming an appropriate determinate state, or whether it remains in an indeterminate state, neither wave nor particle, and responds to the "questions" the experimental arrangements ask of it in either a wave-consistent manner or a particle-consistent manner.[78]

Teaching

[edit]
Wheeler, I. I. Rabi, and Eugene Wigner

Wheeler's graduate students included Jacob Bekenstein, Hugh Everett, Richard Feynman, Peter Putnam,[79] David Hill, Bei-Lok Hu, John R. Klauder, Charles Misner, Kip Thorne, William Unruh, Robert M. Wald, Katharine Way, and Arthur Wightman.[11][80] Wheeler gave teaching high priority, and continued to teach freshman and sophomore physics, saying that young minds were the most important. At Princeton he supervised 46 PhDs, more than any other physics professor.[81] Wheeler wrote a supportive review article to help Hugh Everett's work, wrote to and met with Niels Bohr in Copenhagen seeking his approval of Everett's approach, and continued to advocate for Everett even after Bohr's rejection.[82][83] With Kent Harrison, Kip Thorne, and Masami Wakano, Wheeler wrote Gravitation Theory and Gravitational Collapse (1965). This led to the voluminous general relativity textbook Gravitation (1973), co-written with Misner and Thorne. Its timely appearance during the golden age of general relativity and its comprehensiveness made it an influential relativity textbook for a generation.[84] Wheeler and Edwin F. Taylor wrote Spacetime Physics (1966) and Scouting Black Holes (1996).

Alluding to Wheeler's "mass without mass", the festschrift honoring his 60th birthday was titled Magic Without Magic: John Archibald Wheeler: A Collection of Essays in Honor of his Sixtieth Birthday (1972). His writing style could also attract parodies, including one by "John Archibald Wyler" that was affectionately published by a relativity journal.[85][86]

Participatory anthropic principle

[edit]

Wheeler speculated that reality is created by observers in the universe. "How does something arise from nothing?", he asked about the existence of space and time.[87][88][79] He also coined the term "Participatory Anthropic Principle" (PAP), a version of a strong anthropic principle.[89]

In 1990, Wheeler suggested that information is fundamental to the physics of the universe. According to this "it from bit" doctrine, all things physical are information-theoretic in origin:

Wheeler: It from bit. Otherwise put, every it—every particle, every field of force, even the space-time continuum itself—derives its function, its meaning, its very existence entirely—even if in some contexts indirectly—from the apparatus-elicited answers to yes-or-no questions, binary choices, bits. It from bit symbolizes the idea that every item of the physical world has at bottom—at a very deep bottom, in most instances—an immaterial source and explanation; that which we call reality arises in the last analysis from the posing of yes–no questions and the registering of equipment-evoked responses; in short, that all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and that this is a participatory universe.[90]

In developing the participatory anthropic principle, an interpretation of quantum mechanics, Wheeler used a variant on Twenty Questions, called Negative Twenty Questions, to show how the questions we choose to ask about the universe may dictate the answers we get. In this variant, the respondent does not choose or decide upon any particular or definite object beforehand, but only on a pattern of "Yes" or "No" answers. This variant requires the respondent to provide a consistent set of answers to successive questions, so that each answer can be viewed as logically compatible with all the previous ones. In this way, successive questions narrow the options until the questioner settles upon a definite object. Wheeler's theory was that, in an analogous manner, consciousness may play some role in bringing the universe into existence.[91]

From a transcript of a radio interview on "The Anthropic Universe":

Wheeler: We are participators in bringing into being not only the near and here but the far away and long ago. We are in this sense, participators in bringing about something of the universe in the distant past and if we have one explanation for what's happening in the distant past why should we need more?
Martin Redfern: Many don't agree with John Wheeler, but if he's right then we and presumably other conscious observers throughout the universe, are the creators—or at least the minds that make the universe manifest.[92]

Opposition to parapsychology

[edit]

In 1979, Wheeler spoke to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), asking it to expel parapsychology, which had been admitted ten years earlier at Margaret Mead's request. He called it a pseudoscience,[93] saying he did not oppose earnest research into the questions, but thought the "air of legitimacy" of being an AAAS affiliate should be reserved until convincing tests of at least a few so-called psi effects could be demonstrated.[94] In the question-and-answer period following his presentation "Not consciousness, but the distinction between the probe and the probed, as central to the elemental quantum act of observation", Wheeler incorrectly said that J. B. Rhine had committed fraud as a student, for which he apologized in a subsequent letter to the journal Science.[95] His request was turned down and the Parapsychological Association remained a member of the AAAS.[94]

Personal life

[edit]

For 72 years, Wheeler was married to Janette Hegner, a teacher and social worker. They became engaged on their third date, but agreed to defer marriage until he returned from Europe. They were married on June 10, 1935, five days after his return.[96] Employment was difficult to find during the Great Depression. Arthur Ruark offered Wheeler a position as an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, at an annual salary of $2,300, which was less than the $2,400 Janette was offered to teach at the Rye Country Day School.[97][16] They had three children.[17]

Wheeler and Hegner were founding members of the Unitarian Church of Princeton, and she initiated the Friends of the Princeton Public Library.[98] In their later years, Hegner accompanied him on sabbaticals in France, Los Alamos, New Mexico, the Netherlands, and Japan.[98] Hegner died in October 2007 at the age of 96.[99][100]

Death and legacy

[edit]

Wheeler won numerous prizes and awards, including the Golden Plate Award of the American Academy of Achievement in 1966,[101] the Enrico Fermi Award in 1968, the Franklin Medal in 1969, the Einstein Prize in 1969, the National Medal of Science in 1971, the Niels Bohr International Gold Medal in 1982, the Oersted Medal in 1983, the J. Robert Oppenheimer Memorial Prize in 1984, and the Wolf Foundation Prize in 1997.[76] He was a member of the American Philosophical Society, the Royal Academy, the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, and the Century Association. He received honorary degrees from 18 different institutions. In 2001, Princeton used a $3 million gift to establish the John Archibald Wheeler/Battelle Professorship in Physics.[17] After his death, the University of Texas named the John A. Wheeler Lecture Hall in his honor.[76]

On April 13, 2008, Wheeler died of pneumonia at the age of 96 in Hightstown, New Jersey.[1]

Bibliography

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

John Archibald Wheeler

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
John Archibald Wheeler (July 9, 1911 – April 13, 2008) was an American theoretical physicist whose research spanned nuclear physics, general relativity, and quantum mechanics. He advanced understanding of nuclear fission through collaboration with Niels Bohr, contributing foundational insights into the liquid drop model and its implications for chain reactions. Wheeler's involvement in the Manhattan Project included theoretical support for plutonium production at the Hanford reactors, aiding the development of atomic weapons during World War II. Postwar, he contributed to thermonuclear weapon design and later popularized concepts in general relativity, such as the term "black hole" to describe gravitational collapse endpoints, as well as wormholes and quantum foam. His work on geometrodynamics sought to unify gravity and quantum principles through pure spacetime geometry, influencing relativistic astrophysics. As a mentor at from 1938 to 1976, Wheeler supervised numerous doctoral students, including and , fostering advancements in gravitational physics. He proposed the "it from bit" hypothesis, positing that physical reality emerges from information and observer participation, challenging traditional views of causality in . Wheeler received awards like the for his broad impacts across physics domains.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Influences

John Archibald Wheeler was born on July 9, 1911, in , to Joseph Lewis Wheeler and Mabel Archibald Wheeler, both of whom worked as librarians. His father later became director of the in , while his mother ceased her professional career following Wheeler's birth. As the eldest of four children, Wheeler had a younger brother, Joe (born 1914), and twins and Mary (born around 1916–1918); the family environment, steeped in librarianship, extended to siblings and relatives, with Mary later pursuing library science. The Wheeler family relocated frequently due to the parents' career shifts, living in places including ; ; Benson, Vermont; and . This peripatetic lifestyle occurred within a household rich in books and intellectual resources, fostering Wheeler's voracious reading habits and appreciation for organized information. His parents' professions emphasized the value of knowledge dissemination, while familial roots—father's from 17th-century New England dissenters and mother's from settlers who migrated to before the Civil War—contributed to a heritage of resilience and inquiry. From an early age, Wheeler displayed a penchant for tinkering and mechanical , constructing items such as wooden clocks, guns, railway signals, combination locks, and even dissecting household appliances like his mother's ; he also rewound electric motors for income during a family stay in . captivated him, with his grandfather providing instruction, and his mother's demonstrated mental acuity—such as performing arithmetic upside-down—likely reinforced analytical skills. Uncles' pursuits in further modeled practical problem-solving. At age 10, an involving caps severely injured his hand, highlighting his precocious curiosity about explosives. Wheeler later described himself as a "retarded learner" who best absorbed concepts through teaching others, a shaped by his hands-on, iterative approach honed in this inventive family setting. These influences cultivated a blend of theoretical interest and empirical experimentation that propelled his trajectory into physics.

Academic Formative Years

John Archibald Wheeler graduated from high school in 1926 at age 15 and enrolled that year at , where he pursued studies in physics. His early academic performance reflected a strong aptitude for and theoretical work, building on prior interests in tinkering and quantitative problem-solving developed during a peripatetic family life that included homeschooling elements. Under the supervision of Karl Herzfeld, a theoretical known for contributions to quantum statistics, Wheeler completed his Ph.D. in physics in 1933 after approximately five years at . His dissertation, titled on the theory of dispersion or equivalently the and absorption of by helium atoms, applied emerging quantum mechanical principles to atomic interactions, marking an early engagement with quantum theory's implications for dispersion phenomena. This work positioned Wheeler at the forefront of applying quantum methods to molecular and atomic , though it remained within the classical quantum framework of the early 1930s rather than fully embracing the probabilistic interpretations that would soon dominate.

Pre-War Career in Nuclear Physics

Collaboration with Niels Bohr

In 1934–1935, Wheeler conducted his second postdoctoral year at the University of Copenhagen under , where he consolidated his understanding of and began developing a collaborative relationship with the Danish physicist. During this period, Wheeler absorbed Bohr's approaches to and nuclear structure, which influenced his later theoretical work. The pivotal collaboration occurred in 1939, following Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann's experimental discovery of fission in December 1938. Bohr, who had emigrated to the in late 1938 amid rising Nazi threats, informed Wheeler of the fission discovery upon arriving in New York on January 16, 1939, during a visit to Princeton where Wheeler was faculty. Together, they developed the first general quantum mechanical theory of the fission mechanism, applying the liquid drop model of the nucleus to explain how absorption could deform the nucleus sufficiently to overcome the fission barrier, leading to asymmetric splitting primarily into and fragments. Their seminal paper, "The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission," was published in Physical Review on September 1, 1939—the day World War II began in Europe—detailing the energy balance, deformation process, and statistical rate of fission, while predicting a fission threshold and barriers dependent on nuclear excitation energy. This work provided a theoretical foundation for understanding fission's viability in chain reactions, influencing subsequent nuclear research, though Wheeler later reflected on its implications for atomic weaponry amid the escalating global conflict. The collaboration underscored Bohr's emphasis on complementary descriptions in quantum processes and Wheeler's computational rigor in modeling nuclear stability.

Theoretical Advances in Fission and Scattering

In 1939, John Archibald Wheeler collaborated with to develop a theoretical framework for based on the liquid drop model of atomic nuclei. Their seminal paper, "The Mechanism of ," published on September 1, 1939, in , provided a detailed quantum mechanical explanation of the fission process, deriving the energy barrier height required for deformation and scission of the nucleus. The model treated the nucleus as an incompressible liquid drop subject to and repulsion, predicting a fissionability parameter x=aZ2A1/3x = \frac{a Z^2}{A^{1/3}}, where aa incorporates nuclear radius and surface energy coefficients, ZZ is the , and AA is the ; values of x>1x > 1 indicate tendency, while external excitation overcomes barriers for induced fission. This work quantitatively explained why undergoes fission with slow neutrons due to its lower barrier compared to , which requires higher-energy neutrons, aligning with experimental observations of asymmetric fission fragments and energy release around 200 MeV per event. Wheeler's contributions extended to predicting fission cross-sections and the role of nuclear pairing effects, where even-even nuclei exhibit higher stability against fission than odd-mass isotopes, influencing absorption probabilities. Their analysis also addressed the dynamics of saddle-point deformation, estimating the fission rate via transmission over the potential barrier, which laid groundwork for later statistical models of fission widths. This theoretical advance resolved discrepancies between early empirical findings by and with the liquid drop analogy, emphasizing causal deformation pathways over simplistic rupture. Prior to the fission work, in 1937, Wheeler introduced the concept of the (scattering matrix) as a tool for describing nuclear and reaction processes in . The formalism focused on initial and final asymptotic states, bypassing unobservable intermediate resonances to compute transition amplitudes directly from conservation laws and unitarity, particularly useful for low-energy neutron-proton and compound nucleus formation. This approach, detailed in Wheeler's early publications on theory, anticipated handling of complex multi-body interactions in , where traditional perturbation methods faltered due to strong short-range potentials. By 1939, it complemented fission studies by modeling pre-fission neutron cross-sections, revealing how excitation energies lead to barrier penetration rather than elastic deflection. Wheeler's innovation influenced subsequent developments in , emphasizing observable probabilities over hidden variables.

Nuclear Weapons Contributions

Manhattan Project Theoretical Role

John Archibald Wheeler joined the in 1942 at the in , where he contributed theoretical analyses to the design of nuclear reactors for production. Under , Wheeler focused on calculations of diffusion and multiplication in uranium-graphite systems, aiding the development of sustained chain reactions essential for industrial-scale isotope separation and weapon material yield. His work involved solving partial differential equations governing neutron transport to predict criticality conditions and reactor efficiency. In mid-1944, Wheeler relocated to the Hanford Engineer Works in Washington state as chief theoretical physicist, overseeing the plutonium-producing reactors. He provided foundational models for reactor dynamics, including fission product effects on neutron economy, which informed the scaling from experimental piles to full-scale operations capable of producing hundreds of grams of plutonium daily. Wheeler's group developed theoretical frameworks for optimizing moderator-to-fuel ratios and control rod placements to maintain stable power levels amid varying fuel burnup. A pivotal theoretical contribution occurred in late September 1944, when the , Hanford's first production unit, achieved initial criticality on September 26 but experienced an unexplained power drop hours later, halting operations. Wheeler's team rapidly identified the cause as , a high-cross-section formed as a delayed fission product with a 9.2-hour , whose buildup overwhelmed the excess reactivity. Through diffusion theory calculations and cross-section data analysis, they predicted the poisoning's temporal profile and proposed remedies, including increased loading and process adjustments, enabling the reactor's restart on December 20, 1944, after empirical validation. This resolution prevented delays in supply for the bomb and shaped safeguards in subsequent reactors like D and F.

Hanford Reactor Innovations

![Tube loader at Hanford's B Reactor][float-right] During World War II, John Archibald Wheeler served as the leading physicist at the Hanford Site in Washington state, contributing to the Manhattan Project's plutonium production efforts from July 1944 to September 1945. The Hanford reactors, including the B Reactor, were designed to produce plutonium-239 via neutron irradiation of uranium-238 in a graphite-moderated, water-cooled system. Wheeler's prior work at the Metallurgical Laboratory in Chicago since 1942 informed the reactor designs, where he emphasized potential disruptions from fission product accumulation. The achieved criticality on September 26, 1944, marking the first large-scale industrial at 250 megawatts thermal power. However, approximately 15 to 20 hours after startup, the reactor's and power output plummeted despite increased control rod withdrawal, halting operations and threatening delays in production for the atomic bomb. This "reactor death" puzzled engineers, as initial diagnostics ruled out mechanical failures or fuel issues. Wheeler diagnosed the cause as poisoning by , a fission with an exceptionally high absorption cross-section of about 2.6 million barns, formed via the from iodine-135 ( 6.57 hours) to ( 9.14 hours). Having anticipated such fission product poisons in earlier memos dating to February and April 1942 during considerations, Wheeler had advocated for design margins including additional process tubes and higher loading to enable power increases for "burning out" the poison. engineers, acting on these insights, implemented adjustments by loading more slugs and ramping power, which depleted the and restored reactivity within days. This resolution ensured the Hanford complex produced sufficient for the detonated over on August 9, 1945. The poisoning phenomenon, unprecedented in scale due to the reactor's high flux, became a foundational insight for subsequent operations worldwide.

Thermonuclear Weapon Development

Following the Soviet Union's first atomic bomb test in August 1949, Wheeler rejoined government service, collaborating with Edward Teller at Los Alamos National Laboratory to advance thermonuclear weapon designs. In early 1950, he directed a group at Los Alamos tasked with developing the conceptual design for the initial series of thermonuclear weapons, focusing on fusion staging mechanisms. The breakthrough Teller-Ulam configuration, devised in March 1951, utilized radiation implosion to compress and ignite fusion fuel, rendering practical thermonuclear devices feasible; Wheeler supported this approach through theoretical analysis and design contributions. In 1951, Wheeler established Project Matterhorn B at as a supplementary effort to Los Alamos, directing research from 1951 to 1953 with a team of graduate students and postdocs. Codenamed "B" for , the project emphasized numerical simulations of fusion processes, including analysis of thermonuclear fuel burning, using early computers like the SEAC to model device performance. These efforts complemented preliminary tests in (April–June 1951), which validated key staging principles essential for full-scale thermonuclear detonation. Wheeler's Princeton team contributed directly to preparations for , particularly the Mike shot, the first full-scale thermonuclear test conducted on November 1, 1952, at , yielding 10.4 megatons. Their SEAC-based simulations predicted the Mike device's yield within 30% accuracy, confirming the viability of the Teller-Ulam staged design and paving the way for deployable thermonuclear weapons. As one of the primary civilian advocates for thermonuclear development alongside Teller, Wheeler's work bridged theoretical with feasibility, though B faced resource constraints and coordination challenges with Los Alamos.

Post-War Revival of General Relativity

Renewed Focus on Gravitation

Following his wartime involvement in nuclear weapons research, Wheeler returned to in 1947 and, seeking fresh avenues for beyond the atom, redirected his efforts toward —a theory dormant since Einstein's 1915 formulation, with few advances beyond solar-system tests. By the early , he immersed himself in curvature, viewing it as a frontier for causal descriptions of mass-energy interactions unencumbered by quantum complications. Wheeler later reflected that and gravitation became "the love of the second half of my life," marking a pivot from dynamics to gravitational field equations. Wheeler's engagement intensified in the mid-1950s through weekly seminars at Princeton, where he dissected Einstein's equations for their predictive power in extreme regimes, such as collapsing stars, without invoking unverified extensions like additional fields. This "radical conservatism"—pushing to its logical extremes via rigorous mathematical deduction—contrasted with contemporaneous ' proliferation of hypothetical particles, prioritizing geometry as the fundamental arena for physical laws. His lectures and discussions attracted emerging researchers, fostering a community that challenged the field's perceived experimental inaccessibility. By emphasizing verifiable geometric solutions over speculative additions, Wheeler's initiative revitalized U.S. interest in gravitation, bridging theoretical abstraction with potential astrophysical tests and setting the stage for empirical validations in the 1960s, such as discoveries and timing. His efforts, independent of but complementary to Robert Dicke's experimental probes starting in 1957, elevated from marginal status to a cornerstone of , influencing over a dozen PhD theses under his supervision by decade's end.

Geometrodynamics Program

Wheeler's geometrodynamics program, developed during the , sought to unify physics by reducing gravitational, electromagnetic, and material phenomena to the intrinsic dynamics of geometry, treating as a framework for all interactions without extraneous fields or particles. This approach emphasized solutions where alone generates observable effects, such as "mass without mass" through self-gravitating waves and topological features. Wheeler formalized these ideas in his 1962 book , a compilation advancing Einstein's geometrized toward a comprehensive theory. Central to the program were geons, proposed by Wheeler in 1955 as toroidal or spherical bundles of electromagnetic or gravitational radiation bound by their own gravitational attraction, representing particles as pure geometric excitations. In 1957, extending this to quantum realms, Wheeler introduced "quantum ," exploring spacetime fluctuations at the Planck scale, including —a seething of microscopic and handles that could account for "charge without charge" by trapping lines at wormhole mouths. Collaborations, such as with Dieter Brill and on gravitational geons and Charles Misner on formulations, refined numerical and conceptual tools for analyzing these vacuum configurations. The program revived interest in by prioritizing causal geometry over quantum field-theoretic methods, influencing studies and , though quantization efforts encountered challenges like non-renormalizability and the absence of stable classical wormholes without . Wheeler's 1964 lectures at the Les Houches summer school further disseminated these techniques, underscoring spacetime's role as the fundamental arena for physics.

Conceptualization of Black Holes

During the 1950s, as part of his initiative to interpret through the pure dynamics of geometry, Wheeler examined the fate of massive stars under extreme gravitational fields. Collaborating with graduate students, he revisited and extended the 1939 analysis by and , demonstrating via numerical solutions to Einstein's field equations that stars exceeding approximately three solar masses undergo irreversible collapse, forming compact regions where curvature traps all infalling matter and radiation. This process yields an —a causal boundary beyond which no signals can propagate outward—arising directly from the theory's prediction of incompleteness in highly curved geometries. Wheeler conceptualized these collapsed configurations not as pathological singularities but as robust predictions of , emphasizing their role in testing the theory's limits on and . In lectures and papers, he described them as "frozen stars" or "gravitationally completely collapsed objects," highlighting how the and light deflection imply total isolation from external observers once the horizon forms. His framework integrated these entities into broader topologies, including potential connections via wormholes, but prioritized the inescapable nature dictated by mass-induced , independent of quantum effects at that stage. On December 29, 1967, Wheeler publicly introduced the term "" during his address "Our Universe: The Known and the Unknown" at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in , adopting it for its concise depiction of an object that permits no emission or reflection of light, functioning like a void in observable reality. He formalized the nomenclature in a 1968 article, where were portrayed as endpoints of , with properties reducible to just three parameters—, , and —eschewing extraneous details in a manner evocative of the "no-hair" simplicity later elaborated in the field. This terminological shift, drawn from analogies like the , galvanized research by underscoring the empirical testability of relativity's geometric imperatives against alternatives like stable .

Quantum Mechanics and Unification Efforts

Quantum Foundations and Experiments

Wheeler advanced by proposing thought experiments that interrogated the process and the observer's role in determining quantum outcomes. In a 1978 publication, he introduced the delayed-choice , wherein a 's path through an interferometer is established before the measurement apparatus is configured to detect either interference (wave-like behavior) or which-path (particle-like behavior). The key feature is that the choice of detector setup occurs after the photon has traversed the slits or beamsplitter, yet the resulting data pattern aligns with the post-passage decision, suggesting that the photon's "history" adapts retroactively to the observation mode. This setup, rooted in Bohr's complementarity principle, challenges deterministic by implying that elementary quantum events lack predefined attributes independent of . The delayed-choice proposal extended earlier double-slit demonstrations, such as those by Taylor in 1909 and later low-intensity variants, by emphasizing timing: the measurement choice postdates the system's propagation but precedes detection. Wheeler argued this illustrates ' non-local, non-realist character, where phenomena exist in superposition until participatory observation collapses possibilities into actuality. He envisioned cosmic-scale variants, like using quasars as distant light sources with galactic lenses, to test if quantum indeterminacy persists over billions of years, probing whether the universe's large-scale structure retroactively confirms wave or particle propagation from the era. Though initially conceptual, Wheeler's ideas spurred laboratory realizations, including Jacques et al.'s 2007 interferometer experiment using , which verified delayed-choice effects without invoking beyond standard quantum predictions. Wheeler advocated such empirical scrutiny to adjudicate between Copenhagen interpretations and alternatives like hidden variables, insisting that foundational puzzles demand direct testing rather than philosophical resolution alone. His framework influenced subsequent protocols, such as delayed-choice quantum erasers, which entangle idler photons to erase or recover which-path knowledge post-detection, further delimiting information access as the arbiter of quantum versus classical behavior. These contributions underscored Wheeler's commitment to experiment-driven clarification of quantum reality's observer-dependent .

Information-Theoretic Approaches

In the late , Wheeler advanced the hypothesis that physical reality derives fundamentally from , rather than from or alone, positing that "every it—every particle, every field of , even the continuum itself—derives its function, its meaning, its very existence entirely—even if in some contexts indirectly—from the apparatus-elicited answers to yes-or-no questions, binary choices, bits." This "it from bit" principle, first articulated in a 1989 conference presentation and elaborated in Wheeler's paper ", Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links," reframed as an information-processing framework where observer-participation resolves probabilistic superpositions into definite outcomes via binary decisions. Wheeler drew on empirical quantum experiments, such as the delayed-choice double-slit setup, to argue that reality's apparent continuity emerges from discrete informational acts, challenging classical notions of pre-existing material substrates. He contended that phenomena like particle-wave duality and entanglement reflect not intrinsic properties but the informational content extracted through measurement, suggesting that the universe's laws could be viewed as self-consistent algorithms processing binary inputs. This approach extended to unification efforts, where Wheeler speculated that general relativity's geometry might reduce to informational structures, akin to how entropy scales with surface area in bits, as later formalized by Bekenstein and Hawking. Critics, including some contemporaries, noted that "it from bit" risks conflating with , prioritizing descriptive over causal physical mechanisms, though Wheeler emphasized its roots in verifiable quantum predictions rather than metaphysics. In Wheeler's view, this informational primacy offered a pathway to by treating as emergent from yes/no propositions, influencing subsequent models without claiming empirical disproof of material realism. His framework thus positioned not as a mere tool for physics but as its bedrock, testable through experiments probing observer effects in quantum systems.

Attempts at Quantum Gravity

Wheeler pursued quantum gravity through , a framework aiming to quantize by promoting the spacetime metric to a quantum operator, eschewing auxiliary fields or particles as fundamental entities. In a 1957 analysis, he anticipated that quantized gravity would manifest as probabilistic superpositions of 3-geometries in , the infinite-dimensional configuration space of spatial metrics, with dynamics governed by a Hamiltonian constraint derived from the Einstein equations. This approach sought to resolve singularities, such as those in black holes and the Big Bang, by allowing quantum fluctuations to "smear" geometric defects, though it grappled with infinities and the absence of a clear probabilistic interpretation. Central to Wheeler's vision was , a seething microstructure of spacetime at the Planck scale—length ~1.6 × 10^{-35} m, time ~5.4 × 10^{-44} s—where metric uncertainties from the Heisenberg principle render geometry indeterminate, spawning transient topologies like microscopic wormholes and virtual black holes that foam and dissolve in 10^{-43} s. First articulated around 1955, this concept implied that macroscopic smoothness emerges from averaging these Planckian eruptions, potentially explaining cosmological flatness or horizon problems without , yet empirical tests remain elusive due to the scale's inaccessibility. Wheeler championed canonical quantization of geometrodynamics, culminating in collaboration with Bryce DeWitt on the Wheeler-DeWitt equation (circa 1967), H^Ψ[gij]=0\hat{H} \Psi[g_{ij}] = 0, where Ψ\Psi is the wave functional over 3-metrics gijg_{ij} and H^\hat{H} enforces diffeomorphism invariance and Hamiltonian constraint. This timeless Schrödinger-like equation for the universe's geometry predicted no external time parameter, challenging classical intuitions and birthing the "problem of time," as relational dynamics among geometries substitute for absolute evolution. Wheeler's Princeton group in the 1960s numerically explored "minisuperspace" approximations, reducing to finite degrees of freedom for homogeneous cosmologies, but full quantization faltered on ultraviolet divergences and renormalization, mirroring issues in perturbative quantum field theory. These efforts, detailed in Wheeler's 1962 monograph , prioritized empirical consistency with general relativity's successes while probing quantum unification, yet yielded no renormalizable theory or observable predictions beyond conceptual insights like foam-induced dispersion in light propagation over cosmic distances. Wheeler acknowledged limitations, noting in later reflections that quantum gravity demands reconciling observer-dependent measurements with geometric realism, influencing subsequent canonical and loop quantization paths without resolving core inconsistencies.

Teaching and Intellectual Mentorship

Academic Positions and Pedagogy

Following his Ph.D. from in 1933, Wheeler held National Research Council fellowships at (1933–1934) and the Institute of Theoretical Physics at the (1934–1935). He then served as of Physics at the (1935–1937), advancing to Associate Professor (1937–1938). In 1938, Wheeler joined as Assistant Professor of Physics, a role he maintained until 1945 amid wartime leave for the (1942–1945). He progressed to (1945–1947) and Professor of Physics (1947–1966), followed by appointment as Professor of Physics (1966–1976). During this period, he directed Project Matterhorn (1951–1953), focusing on thermonuclear research. Wheeler retired from Princeton in 1976 but retained status thereafter. Wheeler then moved to the University of Texas at Austin as Professor of Physics and Director of the Center for (1976–1986), holding the Ashbel Smith Professorship (1979–1986) and later the Roland Blumberg Professorship (1981–1986). He maintained a joint appointment at UT Austin until his death. Wheeler's pedagogical approach prioritized conceptual inspiration and active discovery over rote memorization, supervising 47 doctoral dissertations and 46 undergraduate senior theses at Princeton over five decades. His lectures employed unpolished, evolving diagrams and personal modeling of learning processes, encouraging students to admit errors and pursue big-picture explorations. He provided tailored guidance, such as directing toward incremental "little steps for little people" in tackling complex problems, and invested substantial time in fostering research techniques and patience, even with unconventional proposals.

Notable Students and Lasting Influence

Wheeler mentored dozens of doctoral students during his tenure at and later institutions, fostering a generation of physicists through his emphasis on probing fundamental questions in . Among his most prominent students was , who completed his PhD under Wheeler in 1942 and later received the for foundational advances in , including the development of Feynman diagrams. Kip Thorne, another key doctoral student from the 1960s, earned the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics for the detection of gravitational waves, building on Wheeler's geometrodynamics and general relativity research. Hugh Everett III, supervised by Wheeler in the 1950s, formulated the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics in his 1957 thesis, a framework that continues to influence quantum foundations debates. Charles Misner and Wojciech Zurek, both Wheeler students, advanced research in general relativity and quantum information theory, respectively, extending Wheeler's conceptual approaches to spacetime and observer effects. Wheeler's pedagogical style, characterized by rigorous questioning and interdisciplinary synthesis, left a lasting imprint on beyond his direct supervisees. His ability to articulate profound puzzles, such as the role of information in physical law—"it from bit"—stimulated ongoing inquiries into and the foundations of reality, influencing fields like and cosmology. Through collaborative networks and his students' subsequent contributions, Wheeler's emphasis on causal mechanisms and empirical grounding helped sustain momentum in post-war relativity and unification efforts, countering earlier stagnation in these areas.

Philosophical Ideas and Scientific Skepticism

Participatory Universe and Anthropic Views

Wheeler advanced the notion of a participatory universe in the late , arguing that conscious is indispensable for resolving quantum superpositions into concrete physical events, thereby implicating observers in the 's ontological status. This perspective extended the of to cosmological scales, where the 's history remains indeterminate until participatory acts—such as measurements—select specific outcomes from a vast ensemble of possibilities. Wheeler's formulation emphasized that no phenomenon qualifies as real without an observer to confirm it, challenging classical notions of an observer-independent reality. A cornerstone of this idea was Wheeler's delayed-choice gedankenexperiment, first detailed in 1978, which posits that an experimenter's choice of measurement apparatus after a quantum event has occurred can retroactively determine the event's character—for instance, whether a from a distant behaved as a particle or wave en route to . Laboratory realizations of variants, beginning in the , corroborated the quantum predictions but did not resolve interpretive debates about or the observer's role. Wheeler extrapolated this to the cosmos, suggesting that observers today could influence primordial quantum fluctuations, closing a "self-excited circuit" wherein the universe generates the observers who, in turn, validate its existence. In his participatory anthropic principle, Wheeler reframed the anthropic question—why physical constants permit life and observers—by asserting that such fine-tuning arises not from happenstance or multiversal selection but from the necessity of participatory confirmation: only quantum branches yielding observers who retrospectively affirm the constants become actualized. This view, articulated in works like his 1989 paper on information and physics, integrates with his "it from bit" hypothesis, where physical reality ("it") derives from binary yes-no questions answered via observation, rendering the universe a self-referential information-processing system. While empirically untestable at cosmic scales and contested for implying acausal influences, Wheeler's ideas influenced discussions in and cosmology, prioritizing logical consistency with quantum formalism over intuitive causality.

"It from Bit" and Observer Role

John Archibald Wheeler introduced the concept of "it from bit" in his 1989 paper "Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links," presented at the Third International Symposium on the Foundations of in from August 28–31. He proposed that every element of the physical world—"every particle, every field of force, even the continuum itself"—derives its function, meaning, and existence from apparatus-elicited answers to yes-or-no questions, or binary choices known as bits. This hypothesis posits that physical reality ("it") fundamentally originates from information ("bit"), with all things physical being information-theoretic in origin rather than arising from some independent material substrate. Central to "it from bit" is the active role of the observer in , where measurements collapse probabilistic wave functions into definite outcomes, thereby generating the bits that constitute reality. Wheeler described this as a "participatory universe," in which observers, through repeated acts of posing yes/no questions and registering responses, weave the fabric of existence, with no pre-existing laws or continuum independent of such participation. He illustrated this with delayed-choice thought experiments, first proposed in 1979, suggesting that choices made in the present can retroactively influence the character of past events, as if the universe's history is not fixed until observed—confirmed experimentally in 1984. Wheeler emphasized, "No elementary is a phenomenon until it is an observed phenomenon," underscoring that observation does not merely reveal but participates in creating reality. This observer-centric view extends to broader implications, such as entropy, where Wheeler referenced Jacob Bekenstein's work (1972–1980) and Stephen Hawking's refinements (1975–1976), linking information content to surface area in (approximately 2.612 × 10⁻⁶⁶ cm² per bit). However, Wheeler acknowledged challenges, including how multiple observers reconcile their individual impressions into a shared , stating that this issue troubled him more than any other aspect of the framework. Despite its influence on theory, the participatory model remains interpretive, with Wheeler rejecting , preordained laws, or a preexisting as explanatory primitives, favoring instead empirical clues like the "boundary of a boundary is zero" principle from .

Critique of Parapsychology and Pseudoscience

Wheeler maintained a staunch opposition to , dismissing it as a field devoid of reproducible evidence and incompatible with rigorous standards. He argued that claims of and related phenomena failed to produce "battle-tested results," rendering them unworthy of institutional endorsement by bodies like the American Association for the Advancement of (AAAS). This stance stemmed from his adherence to empirical verification, where unconfirmed anomalies—such as those in parapsychological experiments—invited rather than acceptance, encapsulated in his view that persistent doubts signaled underlying flaws. At the AAAS's 145th annual meeting in , , on January 6–12, 1979, Wheeler directly confronted the issue during a session on science and consciousness, where he shared the platform with proponents. He urged the AAAS to expel or suspend 's affiliated organization, the Parapsychological Association, which had gained provisional status in 1969 under Margaret Mead's influence. Distributing a prepared , Wheeler declared, "Where there's smoke, there's smoke," to underscore that the field's controversies and replication failures warranted exclusion rather than tolerance. He contended that such affiliation not only eroded in AAAS but also enabled parapsychologists to leverage scientific prestige for fundraising without commensurate evidentiary progress. In a letter dated January 8, 1979, and published in The New York Review of Books on , Wheeler elaborated that a decade of "permissiveness" had strained advancements in fields like by associating them with "absolutely crazy ideas" promoted under parapsychology's banner. He proposed forming a five-member to evaluate the evidence, advocating suspension of AAAS ties until verifiable outcomes emerged, a position echoed by figures like Admiral . Wheeler clarified that individual pursuit of parapsychological research remained permissible for funding solicitation, but institutional validation demanded empirical rigor absent in the discipline's track record. Wheeler's critique extended to pseudoscientific appropriations of quantum theory, which parapsychologists invoked to lend credibility to or psychokinesis, despite ' foundational reliance on observer-independent predictions and . He warned that young scientists venturing into such areas risked reputational harm, as the field's lack of consensus reproducibility—evident in failed replications of early experiments like those on ESP—contravened causal mechanisms grounded in physical law. This reflected his broader insistence on causal realism, prioritizing phenomena explainable through verifiable interactions over interpretive leaps into the non-physical. Despite efforts like Wheeler's, the AAAS retained the affiliation, highlighting tensions between scientific gatekeeping and pluralism.

Personal Life and Character

Family Dynamics and Personal Losses

Wheeler married Janette Hegner, a , on June 10, 1935, in a union characterized by mutual support and shared intellectual interests; she encouraged his career transitions, including relocations for academic positions. The couple had three children: (born circa 1940s), James English (born 1940s), and Alison (born 1940s), who survived their father. Family life involved frequent moves due to Wheeler's professional demands, from Princeton to Chapel Hill and later , yet Janette maintained stability amid these shifts. A profound personal loss occurred in 1944 when Wheeler's younger brother, Joseph "Joe" Wheeler, was killed in action during World War II near Florence, Italy, while serving in the U.S. Army; Joe had sent Wheeler a postcard urging "Hurry up" shortly before his death in a foxhole. This event deeply affected Wheeler, instilling a sense of guilt over the delayed Manhattan Project timeline, which he believed prolonged the war and contributed to approximately 15 million deaths, including his brother's; it fueled his lifelong preoccupation with time, causality, and the potential for scientific intervention to avert tragedy. Janette Wheeler predeceased her husband, dying on October 22, 2007, after over seven decades of marriage, leaving Wheeler to reflect on in his final months. Wheeler's journals alluded to additional unspoken , including a " that might have been but was not," suggesting possible or challenges within the family dynamic. These losses underscored a resilient yet marked by absence, with Wheeler channeling sorrow into relentless scientific inquiry rather than overt emotional expression.

Extracurricular Interests and Work Ethic

Wheeler pursued physical activities such as and manual work in wooded areas as outlets for , balancing the intellectual demands of his professional life. These hobbies allowed him moments of respite, though his contemplation of fundamental scientific questions often persisted even during leisure. Renowned for his exceptional , Wheeler demonstrated unrelenting dedication throughout his career, marked by rigorous and profound commitment that influenced collaborators and mentees alike. His approach emphasized not mere diligence but a fusion of imaginative insight with exhaustive scrutiny, sustaining productivity into advanced age—he remained intellectually active until shortly before his death at 96.

Death and Scientific Legacy

Final Years and Health

In 1986, Wheeler underwent amid declining health. Two years later, in 1988, his physicians projected a remaining lifespan of three to five years, an estimate he surpassed by nearly two decades through sustained vitality. By 2002, at age 90, Wheeler resided in a in , and depended on multiple hearing aids to manage hearing loss. Despite these limitations, he demonstrated remarkable persistence, traveling by bus twice weekly to his office at Princeton University's Jadwin Hall, where he dictated thoughts on quantum uncertainty and existential questions to his secretary, Emily Bennett. Wheeler's intellectual output persisted into advanced age, with personal journal entries from as late as 2003 reflecting continued exploration of and the observer's role in reality. He died on April 13, 2008, at his Hightstown home, aged 96, from .

Enduring Contributions and Criticisms

Wheeler's most enduring contributions lie in and gravitation, where he revived U.S. interest in the field after through seminal work on , coining the term "" in a 1967 lecture to describe the inescapable endpoints of massive predicted by Einstein's equations. He pioneered concepts like wormholes—hypothetical tunnels in —and geons, self-sustaining gravitational-electromagnetic entities, which anticipated modern explorations of topology in . These ideas, detailed in his 1955 papers and later collaborations with Charles Misner and , influenced the 1,300-page treatise Gravitation (1973), a foundational text for generations of physicists studying dynamics and curvature. In quantum theory, Wheeler's delayed-choice thought experiments, building on the double-slit paradigm, demonstrated how measurement decisions could retroactively influence behavior, underscoring the observer's role in wave-particle duality and inspiring . His 1989 proposal of "it from bit"—positing that every physical "it" derives from binary yes/no questions answered by bits of information—framed the universe as fundamentally informational, paving the way for fields like and the debates. Complementing this, his participatory argued that observers retroactively participate in the universe's quantum history, selecting self-consistent realities from superpositions, a view that has shaped discussions on the fine-tuning of physical constants without invoking multiverses. Additionally, Wheeler's mentorship of 47 Ph.D. students, including Nobel laureates like and , fostered a lineage of relativistic astrophysicists, amplifying his impact on the physics community beyond individual discoveries. Criticisms of Wheeler's later ideas center on their speculative character, particularly the participatory universe and "it from bit," which some physicists argue lack direct empirical falsification and over-rely on interpretive extensions of quantum without rigorous causal mechanisms grounded in field equations. For instance, the notion that "creates" past events via delayed choice has been challenged for conflating interpretive philosophy with testable predictions, potentially exaggerating the observer's ontological primacy amid unresolved tensions. His advocacy for the , tying cosmic structure to observers, drew skepticism for bordering on without quantitative evidence, though proponents credit it with highlighting fine-tuning data from cosmology. Earlier nuclear work, including fission theory with in 1939 and hydrogen bomb contributions from 1950–1953, faced indirect ethical scrutiny in debates over scientists' roles in weaponry, yet Wheeler maintained these advanced fundamental understanding of nuclear processes without personal controversy dominating his legacy. Overall, while his technical innovations endure empirically validated—as in observations by the Event Horizon Telescope—his philosophical extensions remain inspirational but unproven, critiqued for prioritizing conceptual elegance over experimental closure.

References

  1. https://history.aip.org/phn/11503001.html
  2. https://www.ias.edu/scholars/john-archibald-wheeler
  3. https://phy.princeton.edu/department/history/faculty-history/john-wheeler
  4. https://utphysicshistory.net/JohnAWheeler.html
  5. https://paw.princeton.edu/article/professor-john-wheeler-and-nobel-prize-he-never-won
  6. https://paw.princeton.edu/article/retarded-learner-john-archibald-wheeler-still-grapples-universe
  7. https://www.nasonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/wheeler_john.pdf
  8. https://www.science20.com/joy_science/blog/john_archibald_wheeler_doyen_modern_physics
  9. https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/profile/john-wheeler/
  10. https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2010/wheeler-of-historical-note
  11. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.56.426
  12. https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/voices/oral-histories/john-wheelers-interview-1986/
  13. https://www.pugetsound.edu/sites/default/files/file/7579_Bohr%2520liquid%2520drop_0.pdf
  14. https://astronoo.com/en/biographies/john-wheeler.html
  15. https://futurism.com/john-wheelers-participatory-universe
  16. https://nuclearprinceton.princeton.edu/people/john-wheeler
  17. https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/john-wheelers-work-on-particles-nuclei-and-weapons
  18. https://b-reactor.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/mod2015-wntr.pdf
  19. https://b-reactor.org/b-reactor-60th-anniversary-address/
  20. https://ladailypost.com/how-b-reactor-worked-and-its-mysterious-failure/
  21. https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/john-wheelers-h-bomb-blues
  22. https://www.lindahall.org/about/news/scientist-of-the-day/john-wheeler/
  23. https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/62/4/40/390982/John-Wheeler-relativity-and-quantum
  24. https://www.its.caltech.edu/~kip/PubScans/VI-50.pdf
  25. https://www.quantamagazine.org/john-wheeler-saw-the-tear-in-reality-20240925/
  26. https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2018/03/epjconf_icgaxiii-ik2018_01013/epjconf_icgaxiii-ik2018_01013.html
  27. https://academic.oup.com/book/57385/chapter/464716815
  28. https://archive.org/details/geometrodynamics0000whee
  29. https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1811.06587
  30. https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/context/50-years-later-its-hard-say-who-named-black-holes
  31. https://informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/wheeler/Wheeler.pdf
  32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01889373
  33. https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1606
  34. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00156
  35. https://philpapers.org/archive/WHEIPQ.pdf
  36. https://www.themarginalian.org/2016/09/02/it-from-bit-wheeler/
  37. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/73853/1/73.pdf.pdf
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491657900507
  39. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14282
  40. https://refikanadol.com/works/quantum-foam/
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1909142_The_Wheeler_-_DeWitt_Quantum_Geometrodynamics_its_fundamental_problems_and_tendencies_of_their_resolution
  42. https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/john-wheelers-mentorship-an-enduring-legacy
  43. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/not-one-for-chit-chat-naive-in-politics-wheeler-was-a-dealer-in-big-ideas
  44. https://www.famousscientists.org/john-archibald-wheeler/
  45. https://johnhorgan.org/cross-check/physicist-john-wheeler-and-the-it-from-bit
  46. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1979/05/17/a-decade-of-permissiveness/
  47. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/01/09/scientists-group-is-urged-to-oust-parapsychologists/d81a89ef-788a-4c61-a7c4-6821a8648964/
  48. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1979/05/17/quantum-theory-and-quack-theory/
  49. https://www.nytimes.com/1979/01/09/archives/association-urged-to-bar-paranormal-investigators.html
  50. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.451584
  51. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1979/08/26/parapsychology-and-the-integrity-of-science/c610e457-acf7-4efa-b894-a5fb3bbee0e9/
  52. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/apr/16/usa
  53. https://nautil.us/haunted-by-his-brother-he-revolutionized-physics-234736/
  54. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2008-apr-15-me-wheeler15-story.html
  55. https://www.princeton.edu/news/2008/04/14/leading-physicist-john-wheeler-dies-age-96
  56. https://www.nature.com/articles/453050a
  57. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/12/science/peering-through-the-gates-of-time.html
  58. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pioneering-physicist-john-wheeler-dies/
  59. https://metanexus.net/legacy-john-archibald-wheeler/
  60. https://plus.maths.org/content/it-bit
  61. https://mindmatters.ai/2021/05/it-from-bit-what-did-john-archibald-wheeler-get-right-and-wrong/
  62. https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/17936/did-john-wheeler-retract-himself-on-the-participatory-universe-claims
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.