Hubbry Logo
Syria–Lebanon campaignSyria–Lebanon campaignMain
Open search
Syria–Lebanon campaign
Community hub
Syria–Lebanon campaign
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Syria–Lebanon campaign
Syria–Lebanon campaign
Syria–Lebanon campaign
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Syria–Lebanon campaign
Part of the Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of the Second World War

Australian troops among the ruins of the Sidon Sea Castle, Lebanon, July 1941
Date8 June – 14 July 1941
(1 month and 6 days)
Location
Syria and Lebanon
Result Allied victory
Territorial
changes		 Syria and Lebanon taken over by Free France
Belligerents

United Kingdom

Australia
Free France
Czechoslovakia Czechoslovakia

Vichy France

Supported by:
Germany
Commanders and leaders
United Kingdom Archibald Wavell
United Kingdom Henry Wilson
Australia John Lavarack
Free France Paul Legentilhomme		 Vichy France Henri Dentz
Strength
~36,000 troops
  • 18,000
  • 8,400
  • 5,000
  • 2,000
  • 1,600
  • 280+
50+ aircraft
1 landing ship
5 cruisers
8 destroyers		 Vichy France:
~35,000 troops
  • 8,000
  • 25,000
90 tanks
289 aircraft
2 destroyers
3 submarines
German Luftwaffe:
At least 10 bomber aircraft[1]
Casualties and losses
c. 4,652
Australian: 1,552
Free French: c. 1,300
Jordanian: c. 250
British and Indian: 1,800, 1,200 POW, 3,150 sick
41 aircraft[2]		 Vichy France:
6,352 (Vichy figures)
8,912 (British figures)
179 aircraft
1 submarine sunk
5,668 defectors
Germany:
4 aircraft[1]

The Syria–Lebanon campaign, also known as Operation Exporter, was the invasion of Syria and Lebanon (then controlled by Vichy France, a vassal state of Nazi Germany) in June and July 1941 by British Empire forces, during the Second World War.

On 1 April 1941, after the Iraqi coup d'état, Iraq was controlled by Iraqi nationalists led by Rashid Ali al-Gaylani, who appealed for Italian and German support. The Anglo-Iraqi War (2–31 May 1941) led to the overthrow of the Ali regime and the installation of a pro-British government. During this conflict, Admiral François Darlan allowed German aircraft to use Vichy airfields in Syria for attacks against the British in Iraq.[3] The British invaded Syria and Lebanon in June to prevent the Axis powers from using the Syrian Republic and French Lebanon as bases for attacks on Egypt, during an invasion scare in the aftermath of the Axis victories in the Battle of Greece (6–30 April 1941) and the Battle of Crete (20 May – 1 June). In the Western Desert Campaign (1940–1943) in North Africa, the British fought Operation Battleaxe to end the siege of Tobruk and the East African Campaign (10 June 1940 – 27 November 1941) in Ethiopia and Eritrea.

The French conducted a vigorous defence of Syria but, on 10 July, as the 21st Australian Brigade was on the verge of entering Beirut, the French sought an armistice. At one minute past midnight on 12 July, a ceasefire came into effect and ended the campaign.[4] The Armistice of Saint Jean d'Acre (Convention of Acre) was signed on 14 July at the Sidney Smith Barracks on the outskirts of the city. While the surrender was being held, Time magazine referred to the Syria–Lebanon campaign as a "mixed show", and the campaign to this day remains relatively unknown, even in the countries that participated in it.

Background

[edit]

On 28 May 1941, Admiral François Darlan, on behalf of Vichy France, signed the Paris Protocols, an agreement with the Germans which granted Germany access to military facilities in Vichy-controlled Syria.[5] The protocols remained unratified, but Charles Huntziger, the Vichy Minister of War, sent orders to Henri Dentz, the High Commissioner for the Levant, to allow aircraft of the German Luftwaffe and the Italian Regia Aeronautica to refuel in Syria. Marked as Iraqi aircraft, Axis aircraft under Fliegerführer Irak landed in Syria en route to the Kingdom of Iraq during the Anglo-Iraqi War. Darlan, a confirmed Anglophobe, allowed the German and Italian aircraft to use Syrian airfields partly because of attacks on Vichy French ships by the British. He calculated that, since July 1940, 167 French ships had been seized by British forces.[6][7]

Under the Paris Protocols, an agreement was also made for the French to launch an offensive against the British-held Iraqi oilfields, a proposal put forward by Darlan.[6] As well as the use of Syrian airfields, the Germans also requested permission from the Vichy authorities to use Syrian railways to send armaments to Iraqi nationalists in Mosul. In return for Darlan's enthusiastic pro-Axis gestures, the Germans released 7,000 French prisoners of war, many of whom were professional officers and non-commissioned officers.[6] Despite government prodding, General Archibald Percival Wavell, the Commander-in-Chief of Middle East Command, was reluctant to intervene in Syria, because of the situation in the Western Desert, the imminent German attack on Crete and doubts about the Free French intentions.[8]

Prelude

[edit]

Vichy Syria

[edit]
See also: French Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon
Captured French Martin 167F at Aleppo 1941

Dentz was Commander in Chief of the Armée du Levant (Army of the Levant), which had regular metropolitan colonial troops and troupes spéciales (special troops, indigenous Syrian and Lebanese soldiers).[9] There were seven infantry battalions of regular French troops at his disposal, which included the 6th Foreign Infantry Regiment of the French Foreign Legion, the 24th Colonial Infantry Regiment and eleven infantry battalions of "special troops", including at least 5,000 cavalry in horsed and motorized units, two artillery groups and supporting units.[9] The Army had 35,000 troops with 35,000 regulars including 8,000 French and 25,000 Syrian and Lebanese infantry. The French had 90 tanks (according to British estimates), the Armée de l'air had 90 aircraft (increasing to 289 aircraft after reinforcement) and the Marine nationale (French Navy) had two destroyers, Guépard and Valmy as well as one sloop, Élan, and three submarines.[10][11]

On 14 May 1941, a Royal Air Force (RAF) Bristol Blenheim bomber crew flying a reconnaissance mission over Palmyra, in central Syria, spotted a Junkers Ju 90 transport taking off, with more German and Italian aircraft seen later that day. An attack on the airfield was authorised later that evening.[12] Attacks against German and Italian aircraft staging through Syria continued, and the British claimed six Axis aircraft destroyed by 8 June. Vichy French forces shot down a Blenheim on 28 May, killing the crew, and forced down another on 2 June.[13] French Morane-Saulnier M.S.406 fighters also escorted German Junkers Ju 52 aircraft into Iraq on 28 May.[13] The RAF shot down a Vichy Martin 167F bomber over the British Mandate of Palestine on 6 June.[14] While German interest in the French mandates of Syria and Lebanon was limited, Adolf Hitler permitted reinforcement of the French troops by allowing French aircraft en route from Algeria to Syria to fly over Axis-controlled territory and refuel at the German-controlled Eleusina air base in Greece.[15] The activity of German aircraft based in Greece and the Dodecanese Italian Islands of the Aegean was interpreted by the British as support for Vichy troops, but although Dentz briefly considered accepting German assistance, he rejected the offer on 13 June.[16] By the end of the Anglo-Iraqi War, all 14 of the original German Messerschmitt Bf 110 aircraft sent to Syria and five Heinkel He 111 and a large number of transport aircraft had been destroyed by the British.[17]

Palestine and Iraq

[edit]
See also: Mandatory Palestine and Kingdom of Iraq

The British-led invasion of Syria and Lebanon aimed at preventing Germany from using the Mandatory Syrian Republic and Greater Lebanon, controlled by Vichy France, for attacks on Egypt as the British fought the Western Desert Campaign (1940–1943) against Axis forces in North Africa. In September 1936, the French had ceded autonomy to Syria but it retained rights to maintain some armed forces and two airfields in the territory. The British were concerned about potential attacks by Nazi Germany from Syria and Lebanon, or that the Germans might gain access to airfields there. An additional concern related to the possibility of German troops on the Eastern Front linking up with Vichy forces if Germany defeated the Soviet Union, by advancing south through the Caucasus. Both contingencies were unlikely, but would have exposed Allied forces in Egypt to a northern front at a time when all available resources were needed to halt Axis advances from the west.[18] On 1 April 1941, after a coup d'état, Iraq, on the eastern border of Syria, came under the control of nationalists led by Rashid Ali, who was willing to appeal for German support. The Anglo-Iraqi War (2–31 May 1941) led to the installation of a pro-British government.[19]

British forces to the south of Syria in Mandate Palestine were under the command of General Sir Henry Maitland Wilson and consisted of the 7th Australian Division (minus the 18th Brigade, which was in North Africa, besieged at the siege of Tobruk), Gentforce with two Free French brigades of the 1st Free French Division (including two battalions of the 13th Foreign Legion Demi-Brigade attached to the 1st Free French Brigade) and the 5th Indian Infantry Brigade (4th Indian Infantry Division) with artillery, engineers and other support services attached to form the 5th Indian Brigade Group. In northern and central Syria, Iraq Command (Lieutenant-General Sir Edward Quinan) was used in the campaign to attack from the east, consisting of the 10th Indian Infantry Division, elements of the 17th Indian Infantry Brigade (8th Indian Infantry Division) and Habforce, the 4th Cavalry Brigade and the Arab Legion, under John Glubb (Glubb Pasha).[20] Commando and raiding operations were undertaken by No. 11 (Scottish) Commando from Cyprus,[21] as well as Palmach paramilitary and Mista'arvim squads from Mandatory Palestine.[22]

Air support was provided by squadrons from the RAF and the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). Ground forces on the coast were supported by bombardments from Royal Navy (RN) and Royal Australian Navy (RAN) units of the Mediterranean Fleet. At the beginning, Air Commodore L. O. Brown, the Air officer commanding (AOC) HQ RAF Palestine and Transjordan had the understrength 11 Squadron (Blenheim Mk IV), 80 Squadron, re-equipping with Hawker Hurricanes, 3 Squadron RAAF, converting to Curtiss Tomahawks, 208 (Army Co-operation) Squadron with a flight of Hurricanes and X Flight (Gloster Gladiators). A detachment of Fleet Air Arm (FAA) 815 Naval Air Squadron (Fairey Swordfish torpedo bombers) in Cyprus and 84 Squadron (Blenheims) in Iraq were to co-operate.[23]

British forces in reserve included the 6th Infantry Division (with the Czechoslovak 11th Infantry Battalion–East attached to the 23rd Infantry Brigade) and the 17th Australian Brigade.[24] In mid-June, the division with its two infantry brigades came into the line as reinforcements, mainly on the Damascus front, and the southern force was placed under the command of the 1st Australian Corps on 19 June.[25][26][27] At the beginning of Operation Exporter, the British and Commonwealth force consisted of about 34,000 men (18,000 Australians, 9,000 British, 2,000 Indian and 5,000 Free French troops).[28] The RAF and RAAF had about 50 aircraft, and the navy contributed the landing ship HMS Glengyle, five cruisers and eight destroyers.[29]

British plan of attack

[edit]
Indian troops outside Damascus

The British plan of attack devised by Wilson called for four lines of invasion, in Damascus and Beirut, in Palestine, in northern Syria and Palmyra, in central Syria, from Iraq, and in Tripoli (in northern Lebanon) also from Iraq.[30][31] The 5th Indian Brigade Group (Brigadier Wilfrid Lewis Lloyd) was ordered to cross the Syrian border from Palestine and take Quneitra and Deraa. This was anticipated to open the way for the 1st Free French Division to advance to Damascus. Four days after the commencement of the operation, the force was brought under unified command and was named Gentforce after its French commander, Major-General Paul Louis Le Gentilhomme.[32] The 7th Australian Division (Major-General John Lavarack, succeeded by Major-General Arthur "Tubby" Allen on 18 June when Lavarack took over Australian I Corps) advanced from Palestine along the coastal road from Haifa towards Beirut.[33] The Australian 21st Brigade was to take Beirut, advancing along the coast from Tyre, over the Litani River towards Sidon.[34] The Australian 25th Brigade was to attack the large Vichy French airbase at Rayak by advancing along a route further inland from the 21st Brigade.[35] The operation was also to include a supporting commando landing from Cyprus at the south of the Litani River.[36]

Once the two southern prongs were well engaged, a third force of formations drawn from Iraq Command, was planned to invade Syria. The bulk of the 10th Indian Infantry Division (Major-General William "Bill" Slim) was to advance north-west, up the Euphrates River from Haditha in Iraq (upstream from Baghdad), toward Deir ez Zor and thence to Raqqa and Aleppo. The manoeuvre was intended to threaten the communication and supply lines of Vichy forces defending Beirut from the Australians advancing from the south, particularly the railway line running northwards through Aleppo to Turkey, which was thought by some British strategists to be sympathetic to Vichy and Germany.[37] A group of two infantry battalions from the 20th Indian Infantry Brigade (10th Indian Division) and two from the 17th Indian Infantry Brigade (8th Indian Infantry Division) would operate independently to capture all the territory in north-eastern Syria. The 20th Indian Infantry Brigade were to make a feint from Mosul, and the 17th Indian Infantry Brigade would advance into the Bec du Canard (Duck's Bill) region, through which a railway from Aleppo ran eastward to Mosul and Baghdad.[38][39] Habforce was in Iraq attached to Iraq Command because it had struck across the desert from the Transjordan border as part of the relief of RAF Habbaniya during the Anglo-Iraqi War.[40] Habforce consisted of the 4th Cavalry Brigade, the 1st Battalion, Essex Regiment and the Arab Legion Mechanized Regiment supported by field, anti-tank and anti-aircraft artillery units, to gather in western Iraq between Rutbah and the Transjordan border.[41] As the thrust up the Euphrates took place, Habforce would meanwhile advance north-westerly to take Palmyra, Syria, and secure the oil pipeline from Haditha to Tripoli.[40]

Campaign

[edit]

War on land

[edit]
Main axis of invasion from Iraq

Hostilities commenced on 8 June 1941. The battles of the campaign were:

War in the air

[edit]
11 Squadron RAF Bristol Blenheim bombing Beirut, 1941

The initial advantage that the Vichy French Air Force (Armée de l'Air de Vichy) enjoyed did not last long. The Vichy French lost most of their aircraft destroyed on the ground where the flat terrain, the absence of infrastructure and the absence of modern anti-aircraft (AA) artillery made them vulnerable to air attacks.[42] On 26 June, a strafing run by Tomahawks of 3 Squadron RAAF, on Homs airfield, destroyed five Dewoitine D.520s of Fighter Squadron II/3 (Groupe de Chasse II/3) and damaged six more.[43]

On 10 July, five D.520s attacked Bristol Blenheim bombers of 45 Squadron RAF, which were being escorted by seven Tomahawks from 3 Squadron RAAF.[44] The French pilots claimed three Blenheims but at least four D.520s were destroyed by the Australians.[44][45] The following day, a Dewoitine pilot shot down a Tomahawk from 3 Squadron, the only one lost during the campaign.[44] By the end of the campaign, the Vichy forces had lost 179 aircraft from about 289 committed to the Levant, with remaining aircraft with the range to do so evacuating to Rhodes.[46]

War at sea

[edit]

The war at sea was not a major part of Operation Exporter, although some significant actions were fought. During the Battle of the Litani River, rough seas kept commandos from landing along the coast on the first day of battle. On 9 June 1941, the French destroyers Valmy and Guépard fired on the advancing Australians at the Litani River before being driven off by shore-based artillery-fire. The French destroyers then exchanged fire with the British destroyer HMS Janus. The Royal New Zealand Navy light cruiser HMNZS Leander came to the aid of Janus along with six British destroyers and the French retired.[47] The Luftwaffe attempted to come to the aid of the French naval forces on 15 June. Junkers Ju 88s of II./LG 1 (2nd Group, Lehrgeschwader 1), attacked British warships forces off the Syrian coast and hit the destroyers HMS Ilex and Isis. That evening, French aircraft of the 4th Naval Air Group bombed British naval units off the Syrian coast.[47]

Hammana, September 1941. With terrain typical of the region in the background, Maj. Gen. A. S. Allen (centre), commander of the Australian 7th Division, inspects some of his men. British Commonwealth units garrisoned Lebanon and Syria for several months, following the end of the campaign.

On 16 June, British torpedo aircraft sank the French destroyer Chevalier Paul, which had been en route from Toulon to Syria, carrying ammunition from Metropolitan France. The following day, British bombers attacked another French destroyer in the port of Beirut which was also carrying ammunition.[47] On the night of 22/23 June, Guépard fought a brief engagement with two British cruisers and six destroyers off the Syrian coast, before the French destroyer retired under the cover of darkness.[48] The French suffered further losses on 25 June, when the British submarine HMS Parthian torpedoed and sank the French submarine Souffleur off the Lebanese coast; shortly afterwards, the French tanker Adour, which was carrying the entire fuel supply for the French forces in the Middle East, was attacked by British torpedo aircraft and badly damaged.[49]

Armistice

[edit]

On 10 July, as the Australian 21st Brigade was on the verge of entering Beirut, Dentz sought an armistice. At one minute past midnight on 12 July, a ceasefire came into effect and ended the campaign. The Armistice of Saint Jean d'Acre (also known as the "Convention of Acre") was signed on 14 July at the Sidney Smith Barracks on the outskirts of the city of Acre.[4]

Aftermath

[edit]

Analysis

[edit]

Wavell had not wanted the Syrian distraction, given that British forces in the Mediterranean were already overstretched. However, political factors, including pressure from Churchill and CIGS in addition to guarantees by the Free French that any operation into Syria and Lebanon would meet with little resistance, forced his hand. In the event, the Vichy government ordered its soldiers to resist the invasion and its troops offered stiff resistance to the advancing British Empire forces. The Vichy government also conducted an effective propaganda campaign within France, encouraging the people to fight the "hereditary enemy" (Britain) and equating the defence of Syria as a matter of national honour.[50] As a result of the unexpected resistance British forces quickly required reinforcements, which could only be provided piecemeal. Many of the British and Commonwealth troops were novices and the hot, dry, mountainous terrain was a severe test, in which Indian Army units excelled. The Australian contingent had to cope with the worst country but conducted the most effective attack, "with a good plan carried through with great determination". The achievement of air superiority was delayed by the lack of aircraft but the urgency of the situation made it impossible for the naval and ground forces to wait. Vichy French airmen concentrated their attacks on ships and ground targets, which were highly effective until they were forced to move north. The scare caused by the German success in Crete had been exaggerated because the German parachute and glider invasions of The Netherlands and Crete had been very costly and there was little chance of the Germans gaining a bridgehead in Syria. The Germans withdrew from Syria to preserve their forces and to deprive the British of a pretext for invasion. The British invaded Syria anyway and gained naval and air bases far north of Suez, thus increasing the security of the oil route from Basra to Baghdad in Iraq to Haifa in Palestine.[51]

Casualties

[edit]

In August, the Vichy authorities announced 6,352 casualties of whom 521 men had been killed, 1,037 were missing, 1,790 wounded and 3,004 men had been taken prisoner. After the war, Dentz stated that 1,092 men had been killed, which would mean 1,790 wounded, 466 missing and 3,004 prisoners against a British claim of 8,912 casualties of all natures.[28] The Vichy Air Force lost 179 aircraft, most destroyed on the ground, the navy lost one submarine and 5,668 men defected to the Free French.[42][52] The armistice agreement led to the repatriation to France of 37,563 military and civilian personnel in eight convoys, consisting of three hospital ships and a "gleaner" ship, from 7 August to 27 September.[53] Prisoners taken by the Vichy French forces were returned but several British prisoners of war had been sent out of Syria, some after the armistice. The delay in obtaining the return of these prisoners led to the detention of Dentz and 29 senior officers in Palestine who were released when the British prisoners were returned to Syria.[54] British and Commonwealth casualties were about 4,652; the Australians suffered 1,552 casualties, (416 men killed and 1,136 wounded.) The Free French incurred about c. 1,300 losses and 1,100 men taken prisoner; British and Indian casualties were 1,800 wounded, 1,200 men captured and 3,150 sick, including 350 malaria cases.[28] The RAF and RAAF lost 27 aircraft.[55]

Subsequent events

[edit]
Allied leaders meet in Syria. Left to right: Air Chief Marshal Longmore, General Wavell, General de Gaulle, General Catroux

Operations against the Vichy regime in Syria could only be conducted with troops withdrawn from the Western Desert, a dispersal that contributed to the defeat of Operation Battleaxe and made the Syrian campaign take longer than necessary. Churchill had decided to sack Wavell in early May over his reluctance to divert forces to Iraq. Wavell was relieved on 22 June and relinquished command on 5 July, leaving for India two days afterwards.[56] In late July 1941, De Gaulle flew from Brazzaville to congratulate the victors.[57] Free French General Georges Catroux was placed in control of Syria and Lebanon and on 26 November, shortly after assuming this post, Catroux recognized the independence of Syria and Lebanon in the name of the Free French movement.[58] After elections on 8 November 1943, Lebanon became an independent state on 22 November 1943 and on 27 February 1945, declared war on Germany and the Empire of Japan.[59]

By 1945, however, continued French presence in the Levant saw nationalist demonstrations which the French attempted to quell. With heavy Syrian casualties, notably in Damascus, Churchill opposed French action but after being rebuffed by Charles De Gaulle, he ordered British forces into Syria from Jordan with orders to fire on the French. Known as the Levant Crisis, British armored cars and troops reached Damascus, following which the French were escorted and confined to their barracks. With political pressure added, De Gaulle ordered a ceasefire and France withdrew from Syria the following year.[60]

Victoria Cross

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Books

[edit]
  • Auchinleck, Claud (1946). Despatch on Operations in the Middle East From 5th July, 1941 to 31st October 1941. London: War Office. in "No. 37695". The London Gazette (Supplement). 20 August 1946. pp. 4215–4230.
  • Brune, Peter (2003). A Bastard of a Place: The Australians in Papua. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-1-74114-011-8.
  • Chappell, Mike (1987). British Battle Insignia: 1939–1940. Men-At-Arms. Vol. II. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 978-0-85045-739-1.
  • de Wailly, H. (2016) [2006]. Invasion Syria, 1941: Churchill and De Gaulle's Forgotten War [Syrie 1941: la guerre occultée: Vichystes contre gaullistes]. trans. W. Land (2nd English trans. ed.). London: I. B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1-78453-449-3.
  • Gaunson, A.B. The Anglo–French Clash in Lebanon and Syria, 1940–45 (St. Martin's Press, 1987).
  • Herington, John (1954). Air War Against Germany and Italy. Australia in the War of 1939-1945. Vol. 3. Canberra: Australian War Memorial.
  • James, Richard (2017). Australia's War with France: The Campaign in Syria and Lebanon, 1941. Newport, New South Wales: Big Sky Publishing. ISBN 978-1-925520-92-7.
  • Johnston, Mark (2005). The Silent 7th: An Illustrated History of the 7th Australian Division 1940–46. Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-1-74114-191-7.
  • Joslen, H. F. (2003) [1960]. Orders of Battle: Second World War, 1939–1945. Uckfield, East Sussex: Naval and Military Press. ISBN 978-1-84342-474-1.
  • Keegan, John (2005). Dear, I. C. B.; Foot, M. R. D. (eds.). Oxford Companion to World War II. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280670-3.
  • Long, Gavin (1953). "Chapters 16 to 26". Greece, Crete and Syria. Australia in the War of 1939–1945, Series 1, Army. Vol. II (1st online ed.). Canberra: Australian War Memorial. OCLC 3134080.
  • Mackenzie, Compton (1951). Eastern Epic: September 1939 – March 1943, Defence. Vol. I. London: Chatto & Windus. OCLC 1412578.
  • Martin, Chris (2011). World War II The Book of Lists. Stroud: The History Press. ISBN 978-0-7524-6163-2.
  • Mollo, Andrew (1981). The Armed Forces of World War II. London: Crown. ISBN 978-0-517-54478-5.
  • Owen, James (2012). Commando. Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0-349-12362-2.
  • Piekałkiewicz, Janusz (1987). Sea War: 1939–1945. London/New York: Blandford Press. ISBN 978-0-7137-1665-8.
  • Playfair, Major-General I. S. O.; et al. (2004) [1st. pub. HMSO 1956]. Butler, J. R. M. (ed.). The Mediterranean and Middle East: The Germans Come to the Help of their Ally (1941). History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series. Vol. II. Naval & Military Press. ISBN 978-1-84574-066-5.
  • Raugh, H. E. (1993). Wavell in the Middle East, 1939–1941: A Study in Generalship (1st ed.). London: Brassey's. ISBN 978-0-08-040983-2.
  • Richards, Denis (1974) [1953]. Royal Air Force 1939–1945: The Fight At Odds. Vol. I (pbk. ed.). London: HMSO. ISBN 978-0-11-771592-9. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  • Shores, Christopher F.; Ehrengardt, Christian-Jacques (1987). L' aviation de Vichy au combat 2 La campagne de Syrie, 8 juin – 14 juillet 1941 [Vichy Air Combat: Syria Campaign, 8 June – 14 July 1941] (in French). Vol. 2. Paris: Lavauzelle. ISBN 978-2-7025-0171-9.
  • Smith, C. (2010) [2009]. England's Last War Against France: Fighting Vichy 1940–1942 (Phoenix ed.). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 978-0-7538-2705-5.
  • Sutherland, Jon; Canwell, Diane (2011). Vichy Air Force at War: The French Air Force that Fought the Allies in World War II. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Aviation. pp. 53–67. ISBN 978-1-84884-336-3.
  • Sutton, David. Syria and Lebanon 1941: The Allied Fight Against the Vichy French (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2022).
  • Wavell, Archibald (1946). Despatch on Operations in Iraq, East Syria and Iran from 10th April, 1941 to 12th January, 1942. London: War Office. in "No. 37685". The London Gazette (Supplement). 13 August 1946. pp. 4093–4102.

Journals

[edit]
  • Anderson, Betty S., and Götz Nordbruch. "Nazism in Syria and Lebanon: The Ambivalence of the German Option, 1933–1945." International Journal of Middle East Studies 44.1 (2012).
  • Baudru, Remi (October 1993). "Quand l'Armée de l'air partit en Syrie, combattre la RAF: ce que recontent les photos" [When the French Air Force Fought the RAF in Syria: What the Photos Say]. Le Fana de l'Aviation (in French) (287): 16–25. ISSN 0757-4169.
  • Bou-Nacklie, N. E. (1994). "The 1941 Invasion of Syria and Lebanon: The Role of the Local Paramilitary". Middle Eastern Studies. 30 (3): 512–529. doi:10.1080/00263209408701009. ISSN 1743-7881.
  • Shores, Christopher F.; Ehrengardt, Christian-Jacques (July 1970). "Syrian Campaign, 1941: Forestalling the Germans: Air Battles Over S. Lebanon". Air Pictorial. 32 (7). Part I: 242–247. OCLC 29897622.
  • Shores, Christopher F.; Ehrengardt, Christian-Jacques (August 1970). "Syrian Campaign, 1941: Breaking the Back of Vichy Air Strength Conclusion". Air Pictorial. 32 (8). Part II: 280–284. OCLC 29897622.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Syria–Lebanon campaign

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Syria–Lebanon campaign, codenamed Operation Exporter, was a British-directed Allied military offensive from 8 June to 14 July 1941 against French mandates in and during the Second World War. The operation sought to forestall Nazi German exploitation of the as a for attacks on British positions in , , and , amid fears of Axis expansion following the . It involved coordinated advances from Palestine and by approximately 34,000 troops, including 18,000 from the 7th Division, 9,000 British, 5,000 Free French, and 2,000 Indian personnel, confronting forces equipped with modern aircraft and artillery in challenging mountainous and coastal terrain. Despite initial Vichy resistance bolstered by superior air power and fortifications, Allied forces captured key objectives including , , and through amphibious landings, flanking maneuvers, and persistent assaults. The campaign ended in Allied victory with the armistice signed by Vichy general on 14 July, transferring control to Free French authorities and neutralizing a prospective Axis foothold that could have jeopardized Middle Eastern oil supplies and supply routes to . This success, though costly with over 5,000 Allied casualties against Vichy losses of about 6,000 including prisoners, preserved strategic depth for subsequent operations like the relief of .

Background and Strategic Context

Establishment of French Mandates and Interwar Developments

Following the defeat of the in , the Allied powers at the San Remo Conference in April 1920 allocated mandates under the League of Nations framework, assigning administrative control over the territories of and as Class A mandates intended to guide them toward . French forces under General advanced into in July 1920, defeating Arab forces led by Faisal bin Hussein at the on July 24 and occupying , thereby dissolving the short-lived . In Syria, French authorities implemented a policy of divide-and-rule by partitioning the territory into semi-autonomous states on December 1, 1920, including the States of and , the , and the , aiming to weaken centralized Arab nationalist opposition while favoring minority groups amenable to French influence. A loose encompassing Damascus, Aleppo, and Alawite regions was formed in July 1922, but it lacked substantive powers and served primarily as a facade for continued French oversight. The of Nations formally approved the Mandate for and on September 29, 1923, codifying French authority despite local resistance to the arrangement as a form of colonialism rather than tutelage. In Lebanon, Gouraud proclaimed the State of (Grand Liban) on , 1920, expanding the Ottoman-era Mutasarrifate of —predominantly Maronite Christian—by incorporating and other coastal areas, the Bekaa Valley, and southern districts with significant Muslim populations, thereby creating a multi-confessional entity designed to secure French strategic interests in the . This reconfiguration, which increased the Muslim demographic share and sowed seeds of sectarian tension, prioritized viability as a French-aligned over historical or ethnic homogeneity. Interwar resistance crystallized in the of 1925–1927, ignited on July 18, 1925, when leader rebelled against French conscription and centralizing reforms in , rapidly spreading to Sunni urban centers including a uprising led by . French forces, deploying aircraft and artillery, bombarded in October 1925 and suppressed the insurgency by mid-1927 through superior firepower, resulting in thousands of casualties and the exile or execution of rebel leaders, though the revolt galvanized pan-Arab nationalism and exposed the mandate's repressive undercurrents. In , stability was relative, with economic modernization—including port expansions in and rail links—but underpinned by favoritism toward Maronite elites, fostering nascent movements like the Phalanges Libanaises in , which drew fascist inspiration to advocate Lebanese particularism against Syrian irredentism. By the 1930s, unfulfilled promises of —such as the 1936 Franco-Syrian Treaty, which envisioned gradual but faltered amid French domestic politics and global tensions—intensified nationalist agitation, with strikes and protests underscoring the mandates' failure to transition beyond colonial extraction, including resource concessions to French firms. Demographic engineering and sectarian quotas persisted, entrenching divisions that would complicate postwar state-building, while French infrastructure investments, such as irrigation in the Orontes Valley, yielded mixed economic gains overshadowed by fiscal burdens on locals. These developments primed the region for vulnerability during , as Vichy French alignment after 1940 alienated Britain and amplified Axis sympathies among some nationalists disillusioned with mandate rule.

Vichy French Administration and Potential Axis Alignment

Following the Franco-German armistice of June 22, 1940, the French mandates of Syria and Lebanon transferred to the administration of Vichy France, the collaborationist regime established under Marshal Philippe Pétain in unoccupied metropolitan France. This shift placed the territories under the authority of Vichy-appointed officials, who maintained the pre-existing mandate structures while aligning with Vichy's policy of accommodation toward Nazi Germany to preserve French sovereignty over colonial possessions. General Henri-Fernand Dentz, a career officer with prior service in Syria during World War I, was appointed High Commissioner for Syria and Lebanon on December 6, 1940, succeeding General Maxime Weygand; Dentz also assumed command of the Armée du Levant, the Vichy forces in the region comprising approximately 40,000 troops, including metropolitan French units, colonial levies such as the Troupes Spéciales du Levant (primarily Circassian, Druze, Alawite, and Armenian irregulars), and limited air and naval assets. Vichy's administration in the Levant emphasized defensive consolidation and nominal neutrality, fortifying key positions along the borders with British Mandate Palestine, Transjordan, and , while suppressing pro-independence movements among Arab nationalists who had agitated for under the Third Republic. However, Vichy's broader alignment with the —stemming from the terms that rendered it a satellite of —raised Allied concerns over the territories' potential as staging grounds for Axis operations in the . In May 1941, following the and the pro-Axis revolt in , Vichy authorities under Admiral permitted German aircraft to refuel at Syrian airfields, including , facilitating approximately 20-30 sorties to support the Iraqi insurgents against British forces; this included fighters and bombers en route from Europe. These actions, formalized in a secret Franco-German protocol signed on May 29, 1941, granted access to select bases in and for transit and limited operations, ostensibly in exchange for 's retention of administrative control. Dentz's regime also routed arms and supplies—estimated at 6,000 rifles, 300 machine guns, and ammunition via —to Iraqi rebels, exacerbating British fears of a contiguous Axis corridor from through the to and Persia, which could threaten the and oil routes. Although professed disinterest in full belligerency and Dentz maintained that local forces would resist unauthorized Axis garrisons, the administration's compliance with German requests underscored its pragmatic deference to , prioritizing colonial defense against perceived Free French and British encroachments over strict neutrality. This alignment, while not entailing direct troop commitments to Axis campaigns, positioned and as latent threats in Allied strategic calculations, prompting preemptive plans by June 1941.

Broader Middle East Crises: Iraq Revolt and Allied Vulnerabilities

The , executed on 1 April by and pro-Axis army officers of the , deposed the pro-British regent and prime minister , installing a nationalist government aligned with and . The new regime encircled the British base at Habbaniya on 3 May, prompting Britain to declare and mobilize forces from , Transjordan, and under Iraqforce, including elements of the 10th Indian Infantry Division and Habforce. German support for the rebels, coordinated via Vichy French Syria, involved detachments under led by , which flew approximately 20 aircraft through Syrian airfields to bomb British positions and supply Rashid Ali's forces with munitions starting in mid-May. British counteroffensives, including relief of Habbaniya on 6 May and capture of on 19 May after aerial and yielding 300 Iraqi prisoners, culminated in the fall of on 31 May, forcing Rashid Ali to flee to and ending the revolt with over 2,500 Iraqi casualties. This crisis exposed acute Allied vulnerabilities across the , where British Commonwealth forces remained thinly dispersed following defeats in and , with garrisons in numbering fewer than 10,000 at the revolt's outset amid threats to oil fields supplying 10% of Britain's wartime fuel needs. The episode strained logistics, diverting troops from and prompting reinforcements to that inadvertently bolstered Jewish militias like the against potential Arab unrest. Vichy Syria's facilitation of Axis transit underscored the risk of contiguous French mandates serving as conduits for further German incursions, threatening Egypt's defenses, the , and overland routes to essential for sustaining imperial supply lines. Allied leaders, perceiving the revolt as a near-successful Axis proxy operation exploiting post-Dunkirk weaknesses, prioritized neutralizing -held and to forestall similar uprisings and secure the region's strategic flanks before potential reinforcements from could materialize.

Prelude to Operation Exporter

Allied Intelligence Assessments and Threat Perceptions

Allied intelligence agencies, primarily British, assessed Vichy French territories in and as a latent to imperial communications and oil supplies in the , exacerbated by the pro-Axis leanings of Vichy leadership under Marshal . Following the collapse of the pro-Axis Rashid Ali government in during the (May 1941), British analysts feared could serve as a staging ground for German reinforcements, enabling Axis forces to bypass Turkish neutrality and strike toward , Transjordan, and the . This perception was rooted in Vichy's armistice obligations to , which permitted limited Axis transit rights, and General Henri Dentz's administration in , which demonstrated willingness to collaborate by allowing overflights and landings. Reconnaissance flights provided concrete evidence amplifying these threats: on 14 May 1941, a British Blenheim bomber identified a German transport aircraft at the Vichy-controlled airfield in eastern , prompting immediate RAF bombing raids on German assets there and at Rayak. Subsequent intelligence reported approximately 200 German aircraft sighted near since 9 May 1941, many en route to bolster Rashid Ali's revolt, underscoring 's role as an Axis air bridge. These incursions violated Vichy assurances of neutrality and fueled assessments that, absent intervention, 's 35,000–40,000 troops—equipped with modern French arms—could link with German paratroopers or motorized units to sever the vital and imperil British positions in and . Broader threat evaluations extended to naval and aerial dimensions: Allied planners perceived Vichy ports like as potential resupply points for U-boats or Italian submarines operating from the Mediterranean, while Syrian airfields posed risks to RAF supply lines from to . Joint Intelligence Committee reports emphasized the strategic vulnerability, noting that Axis exploitation of could outflank Allied defenses in amid Rommel's advances, potentially collapsing the . Free French intelligence under aligned with these views, portraying Dentz's forces as ideologically susceptible to full Axis alignment, though British skepticism of de Gaulle's motives tempered reliance on his inputs. Ultimately, these assessments justified Operation Exporter as a preemptive measure to neutralize the threat before German ground commitments materialized, prioritizing empirical indicators like aircraft sightings over speculative loyalty.

British Commonwealth Force Composition and Logistics

The British Commonwealth forces committed to Operation Exporter were commanded by Lieutenant-General , who directed operations from Advanced Headquarters British Troops and Trans-Jordan. Ground elements initially comprised approximately 34,000 troops, including 18,000 Australians, 9,000 British, and 2,000 Indian personnel, drawn primarily from formations in . The Australian contingent formed the core, with elements of the 7th Australian Division—specifically the 21st and 25th Brigades, totaling around six battalions such as the 2/14th, 2/16th, and 2/27th—assigned to the southern and central thrusts into . Supporting them was the 5th Indian Infantry Brigade, consisting of three battalions including the 1st , 3/1st , and 4/6th . British units included elements of the 6th Division, with the 16th and 23rd Brigades deployed as reinforcements, particularly along the axis, featuring regiments like the 2nd Queen's Royal Regiment. Additional support came from the 1st Cavalry Division's two regiments (one horsed, one mechanized) and Habforce detachments from , incorporating the 4th Cavalry Brigade and 1st . The 17th Australian Brigade also participated in central sector operations, while specialized units such as C Battalion of the provided commando elements. Air support was furnished by squadrons, including with Tomahawk fighters operating from Palestinian bases, alongside Blenheim bombers from No. 11 Squadron. Naval elements of the Royal Navy, including cruisers and destroyers, facilitated amphibious landings and provided gunfire support off the Lebanese coast. Logistics for the campaign relied on staging areas in , with supplementary supplies drawn from and , but faced significant constraints including shortages of lorries, tanks, signal equipment, and anti-aircraft defenses. Supply lines extended over rugged mountainous terrain in the and Anti-Lebanon ranges, complicating advances and maintenance, particularly as forces pushed inland from coastal landings near . The Royal Navy's efforts aimed to interdict reinforcements, but ground depended heavily on limited motor transport and captured enemy resources to sustain prolonged operations beyond initial assault phases. These challenges contributed to a slower-than-expected tempo, necessitating incremental reinforcements like the full commitment of the 6th British Division by mid-June.

Vichy French Military Deployments and Defensive Posture

The Vichy French forces in the , known as the Armée du Levant, were commanded by Général d'Armée , who served as both High Commissioner for and and Commander-in-Chief of the army, with overall strength estimated at approximately 35,000 professional troops comprising French metropolitan units, colonial infantry, Foreign Legion elements, and locally recruited Troupes Spéciales du Levant. These included regular formations such as the 6th Foreign Infantry Regiment (nicknamed the "Regiment of the Levant") based in , , with four battalions, as well as Senegalese and North African battalions like elements of the 22nd Algerian Regiment. Local levies in the Troupes Spéciales, numbering several thousand additional auxiliaries, were organized into cavalry and infantry units, including Circassian cavalry squadrons, though their reliability varied due to political tensions and potential sympathies toward Arab independence movements. Deployments were concentrated along anticipated Allied invasion axes from , with heavier garrisons in and along the Syrian border to exploit terrain advantages. In the coastal sector, a battalion of the 22nd Algerian Tirailleurs held positions at the crossing, supported by two companies of Foreign Legionnaires near Adloun and a small armored element of R-35 light tanks for local counterattacks. Central and interior featured dispersed reserves, including three battalions of North African infantry and Legionnaires around key chokepoints like the approaches to , with mobile groups incorporating up to 20 R-35 tanks, 75mm field guns, machine guns, and mortars for rapid response. served as a major naval and administrative hub with fortified coastal defenses, while and Aleppo hosted rear-area commands and airfields, though troop density was thinner in the desert flanks to avoid overextension across the 240-mile front. The defensive posture emphasized delay and attrition rather than decisive engagement, leveraging Lebanon's mountainous ridges, river barriers like the Litani and Damour, and Syria's arid plains to canalize attackers into kill zones. Fortifications included concealed bunkers, ancient cave networks adapted for machine-gun nests, and well-sited overlooking river valleys, with Dentz's strategy relying on small, disciplined units to inflict casualties through ambushes and counterthrusts before falling back on prepared lines around and . Limited mechanized assets—primarily obsolete R-35 tanks and fewer than 100 aircraft—prioritized defensive support over offensive maneuvers, reflecting Vichy constraints under the 1940 and logistical isolation, though Dentz anticipated potential Axis air reinforcement via the Paris Protocols. This setup proved effective in initial phases, stalling advances through coordinated fire and terrain denial despite numerical parity with invaders.

Conduct of the Campaign

Opening Invasions: Lebanon Landings and Sidon Capture ()

Operation Exporter commenced on 8 with Allied forces advancing from into , aiming to secure the coastal route to and neutralize French positions. The primary thrust along the Mediterranean coast was led by the Australian 21st Infantry Brigade under Brigadier J. E. S. Stevens, supported by elements of the 7th Australian Division, Free French troops, the British 5th Indian Infantry Brigade, and C Battalion of the . French forces in the region, part of the totaling around 35,000 personnel, included professional units such as the 22nd Algerian Regiment and companies equipped with R-35 light tanks. An initial amphibious landing attempt by C Battalion targeted the bridge on 8 June to seize the crossing intact, but heavy surf disrupted the operation, and Vichy forces destroyed the bridge upon detecting the approach. The commandos suffered severe losses, with nearly half the battalion casualties, including the death of Lieutenant-Colonel R. N. N. Pedder. This failure compelled the Allies to rely on overland advances, delaying momentum as engineers constructed a across the Litani by 10 June, allowing the 21st Brigade to cross amid rearguard actions. Further delays occurred at Adloun, where Vichy legionnaires and tanks utilized concealed positions in ancient caves to hold off Australian infantry for two days using machine guns and mortars. By 12 June, Australian elements of the 21st approached , encountering entrenched defenses. An assault on 13 June by the 2/27th and 2/16th Australian Battalions faltered against determined resistance, prompting a renewed attack on 14 June bolstered by naval gunfire from British and Australian warships. forces withdrew under pressure that night, enabling the capture of on 15 June after street fighting in the city's ruins, including the Crusader-era sea castle. Allied in the opening phase reached approximately 500 by 13 June, reflecting the unexpectedly stubborn opposition that slowed the coastal advance despite Allied numerical superiority and air support. This success at secured a key port and supply point, facilitating further pushes toward and the interior, though it highlighted the challenges of terrain and fortified positions in Lebanon's littoral.

Advances in Syria: Battles of Jezzine, Damour, and Damascus (June–July 1941)

Following the initial invasions on 8 June 1941, Allied forces under General advanced on multiple axes into and to secure and . The central column, comprising the Australian 25th Infantry Brigade, pushed towards to support the coastal advance, while the eastern flank with the British 5th Indian Infantry Brigade and Free French troops targeted . These operations faced determined French resistance, including colonial infantry and artillery, but Allied air and naval superiority facilitated progress despite challenging terrain. Battle of Jezzine (13–18 June 1941): The Australian 25th Brigade, commanded by A. R. B. Cox, conducted a night march on 13 June to seize , a key position midway between the border and . On 14 June, the 2/31st Battalion assaulted Green Hill under Frank Berryman's direction, supported by 25-pounder at close range, capturing the feature and entering the town by nightfall. counterattacks from 15 to 18 June were repelled, securing the position and enabling linkage with coastal forces. Australian casualties in this engagement contributed to the brigade's broader losses, with effective and coordination proving decisive. Battle of Damascus (8–21 June 1941): The 5th Indian Brigade advanced from Deraa, captured on 8 June, reaching Kissoué by 15 June before engaging defenses around Mezzeh on 18–20 June. Free French forces under General Paul Legentilhomme, supported by British and Australian elements, entered on 21 June after repelling a counteroffensive. This victory severed communications and boosted Free French legitimacy, with the city's fall marking a strategic turning point in the eastern advance. Allied troops included Circassian for flank protection, though fighting was intense in suburban areas. Battle of Damour (5–9 July 1941): As the culmination of the coastal push, Australian 7th Division under Major-General Arthur Allen assaulted Damour, 30 km south of . The 21st Brigade crossed the Damour River on 5–6 July, capturing El Atiqa and El Boum, then outflanked the town with battalions including the 2/3rd, 2/5th, and 2/14th. On 9 July, the 2/2nd Pioneer Battalion and 6th Divisional Cavalry entered the abandoned positions, prompting armistice requests. This battle, involving intense close-quarters fighting, sealed the campaign's success, with Australian engineering and infantry maneuvers overcoming fortified defenses. Total Australian casualties across these advances numbered 416 killed and 1,136 wounded.

Aerial Warfare: RAF Superiority and Vichy Air Challenges

The (RAF), supported by (RAAF) squadrons, rapidly secured air superiority over the Syria-Lebanon theater following the invasion's commencement on 8 , primarily through preemptive strikes on French airfields that neutralized much of the opposing force on the ground. , including Hawker Hurricanes for fighter interception and bombers for tactical strikes, operated from bases in and were allocated approximately 70 machines specifically for Operation Exporter, enabling sustained operations despite the theater's logistical strains. This dominance curtailed French aerial interference, allowing unhindered reconnaissance, bombing of ground targets, and that facilitated Allied advances along key axes such as the coastal road to and inland routes toward . The Vichy French Armée de l'Air in the began the campaign with over 90 aircraft, including outdated Potez 63 and Morane-Saulnier MS.406 fighters alongside a smaller number of more capable Dewoitine D.520s—totaling about 35 modern fighters after reinforcements that swelled overall strength to roughly 289 machines by mid-campaign. However, pilots conducted limited sorties due to stringent operational restrictions imposed by higher command, fuel shortages exacerbated by Allied naval blockades, and the destruction of forward bases like Rayak and , where dozens of aircraft were caught stationary during initial RAF raids on 8–9 June. claims included downing a single British Blenheim bomber early in the fighting, but such successes were rare and did not alter the strategic imbalance, as Allied fighters outmaneuvered formations in sporadic engagements over . By the armistice on 14 July 1941, aerial losses reached 179 aircraft—most immolated on airfields or abandoned due to unsustainable attrition—contrasting sharply with the 27 Allied machines lost to all causes, underscoring the RAF's qualitative and tactical edges in training, coordination with ground forces, and exploitation of surprise. This lopsided outcome stemmed from causal factors including 's defensive posture, which prioritized ground defense over aggressive air defense, and Allied interdiction that severed supply lines from , rendering reinforcements ineffective. The resulting uncontested skies proved decisive, as RAF bombing runs disrupted reinforcements and logistics, contributing to breakthroughs at and Damour without significant aerial opposition. The , in coordination with units from the , played a supporting role in Operation Exporter by securing coastal waters, providing gunfire support to ground advances, and interdicting Vichy French naval assets to prevent reinforcements from . No major fleet actions occurred, as Vichy naval forces in the region were limited, but Allied vessels maintained a of key ports like and Tripoli to isolate Vichy defenders and disrupt supply lines. On 9 June 1941, during the initial advance toward , two Vichy French destroyers, Guépard and Valmy, shelled Australian troops crossing the but inflicted minimal damage due to inaccurate fire and were repelled by shore-based artillery from the 2/5th Field Regiment. The destroyers withdrew after sustaining hits, highlighting the Allies' naval superiority despite the absence of immediate countering surface ships; HMNZS Leander later reinforced the area to deter further sorties. This engagement underscored efforts to contest Allied amphibious probes, including a failed landing from HMS Glengyle hampered by rough seas. Subsequent naval bombardments proved decisive in coastal battles. At on 14 June, ships including HMS Ajax delivered pre-assault fire that softened defenses, aiding the 25th Brigade's capture of the port. During the Battle of Damour from 6–9 July, HMAS Perth, alongside HMS Ajax and destroyers like HMS Jervis, provided sustained gunfire support, targeting French positions and river crossings; Perth alone fired over 400 rounds in nightly barrages that suppressed artillery and facilitated Australian infantry assaults.) These actions inflicted significant casualties on forces and compensated for Allied logistical constraints inland. Fleet Air Arm squadrons, notably Nos. 815 and 829 operating from carriers, conducted daily reconnaissance over and Juniye harbors, striking merchant vessels and suspected submarines to enforce the blockade. On 22 June, attacked , damaging a and a vessel tentatively identified as a U-boat tender, though results were unconfirmed; such strikes aimed to deny access to maritime resupply amid fears of Axis overland transit through . Overall, these efforts minimized naval interference, with no successful reinforcements reaching Syria-Lebanon by sea, contributing to the campaign's success despite Vichy's larger potential reserves in .

Armistice Negotiations and Cessation of Hostilities (July 1941)

Following the capture of Damour by Allied forces on 9 July 1941, French commander General , confronting the collapse of his defensive lines and the approach of Commonwealth troops toward , formally requested an armistice on 11 July. This followed an earlier informal overture on 8 July, when Dentz urged an immediate cessation of hostilities through U.S. George Engert in , citing the untenable military situation amid orders to resist despite numerical disadvantages. Negotiations commenced promptly, with Dentz delegating his , General Joseph de Verdilhac, to confer with British General , the Allied commander-in-chief, at Acre in British Mandate Palestine. Initial British-drafted terms, transmitted via diplomatic channels on 9 July, encountered delays due to communication failures and hesitations over references to Free French involvement, but de Verdilhac accepted modified conditions after brief contention. A provisional took effect at one minute past midnight on 12 July 1941, halting active combat across and after six weeks of operations. The formal of Saint Jean d'Acre—also termed the Convention of Acre—was signed on 14 July 1941 at Sidney Smith Barracks near Acre by Wilson and de Verdilhac on behalf of Dentz, with Free French General appending a separate declaration affirming his forces' role in the occupation. Key provisions stipulated the immediate cessation of hostilities; the intact handover of naval vessels, aircraft, and air/naval facilities to Allied control; the release of all prisoners of war; and occupation of the territories by British Commonwealth and Free French troops. personnel, totaling approximately 37,736, were offered repatriation to unoccupied or integration into Free French units, with 5,668 opting for the latter amid logistical challenges for mass evacuation via or sea routes. The agreement preserved nominal Vichy administrative continuity in the short term but effectively ceded military authority, enabling Allied consolidation without further resistance; remaining Vichy garrisons in remote areas like surrendered by late July under similar terms. These negotiations reflected Dentz's pragmatic assessment of unsustainable attrition—Vichy losses exceeded 6,000 against Allied casualties of about 3,300—prioritizing troop preservation over prolonged defense mandated from metropolitan .

Immediate Aftermath

Casualties, Captures, and Material Losses

The Allied forces suffered approximately 5,000 casualties during the campaign, including killed, wounded, and captured personnel. British Commonwealth troops, comprising the bulk of the ground forces, recorded around 3,300 casualties, which encompassed prisoners taken during engagements such as the Battle of Merdjayoun. Australian units alone sustained 416 killed and 1,136 wounded, representing a significant portion of the total due to their prominent role in assaults on key positions like and Damour. Free French forces incurred about 1,300 casualties, with an additional 1,100 personnel captured, reflecting their secondary but persistent advances from the north. The Royal Air Force lost 27 aircraft to combat and operational causes, contributing to temporary disruptions in air support. Vichy French forces experienced heavier proportional losses, totaling over 6,000 casualties, including roughly 1,000 killed in action across the theater. These figures accounted for both regular French troops and colonial units such as Senegalese and Tunisian battalions, which bore the brunt of defensive stands at fortified sites like Sidon and Damascus. Specific engagements yielded hundreds of prisoners, including 300 at Damascus (many wounded), 187 at Palmyra (among them 48 airmen), and smaller groups from outposts like Deir ez Zor and Ezraa. Naval elements suffered the sinking of the submarine Soufleur, the troopship St. Didier, and the destroyer Chevalier-Paul, alongside damage to other vessels during blockade actions. Air losses were substantial, with at least 55 aircraft destroyed on Syrian airfields by Allied bombing, exacerbating the Vichy air force's overall attrition from an initial commitment of around 289 planes.
SideKilledWoundedCaptured/PrisonersMaterial Losses
Allied (British Commonwealth & Free French)~1,000 (est., incl. 416 Australian)~3,000+ (est., incl. 1,136 Australian)~1,100 (Free French; British incl. in total casualties)27 RAF aircraft
Vichy French~1,000Unknown (part of total >6,000 casualties)Thousands (e.g., 300 at , 187 at )55+ aircraft on ground; ships sunk (Soufleur, St. Didier, Chevalier-Paul)
Following the on 14 July 1941, the majority of captured personnel—estimated in the tens of thousands when including those who laid down arms en masse—were offered repatriation to or integration into Free French ranks, with only a minority opting for the latter. Captured equipment, including and naval assets within range, was largely returned intact to Allied control per terms, minimizing long-term material denial to potential Axis use. German and Italian advisors among the prisoners were retained by the Allies, while Vichy-held Allied prisoners were repatriated. These outcomes reflected the campaign's emphasis on over total destruction, though combat losses underscored the Vichy forces' determined resistance despite inferior strategic position.

Occupation Administration and Free French Integration

Following the signed on 12 July 1941, Allied forces under British command initiated military occupation of and to secure the region against Axis threats, with British Ninth Army assuming overall control of Allied troops in the area from 1 November 1941. Civil administration, however, was progressively transferred to Free French authorities to restore French influence while aligning with Allied war aims, replacing officials with personnel loyal to General Charles de Gaulle's Free French movement. General , appointed Delegate-General of for and on 24 June 1941, was installed as governor and commander-in-chief of the following the defeat, overseeing the integration of administrative structures nominally under French mandate authority. On 27 September 1941, Catroux proclaimed the independence of the Republic of in , installing Taj al-Din al-Hasani as provisional president, while on 26 November 1941, he extended a similar declaration to , affirming self-governance under Free French oversight. These proclamations, issued on behalf of de Gaulle, aimed to legitimize Free French control and rally local populations, though effective sovereignty remained curtailed by ongoing occupation and French administrative dominance until 1946. Free French integration extended to military forces, with approximately 5,000–6,000 former troops and officers rallying to the Allied side post-armistice, bolstering the Free French under Catroux's command and enabling the establishment of a unified French-led occupation framework. British authorities coordinated security operations but deferred civil governance to Catroux's delegation, fostering a joint structure where Ninth Army handled logistics and defense while Free French managed local administration, , and economic policies, including decrees for cost-of-living adjustments and minimum wages in late 1941 to stabilize post-campaign conditions. This arrangement reflected pragmatic Allied compromise, though underlying tensions arose over de Gaulle's insistence on exclusive French postwar authority, prompting British reservations about restoring pre-1940 mandate powers. By 1945, as the war concluded, the Free French transitioned to sole via the , with British forces withdrawing progressively amid negotiations in on 21 December 1945, culminating in French troop evacuations from by 30 April 1946 and by 31 August 1946.

Victoria Cross Awards and Individual Heroism

Lieutenant Arthur Roden Cutler of the 2/5th Australian Field Regiment received the for most conspicuous and sustained gallantry during operations in from 19 June to 6 July 1941, particularly around Merdjayoun and in the advance to Damour. Despite heavy enemy fire, Cutler personally established forward observation posts, directed artillery fire on French positions, and engaged enemy troops with and , often under intense machine-gun and mortar bombardment. On one occasion near Merdjayoun, he led a that captured a key ridge, silencing multiple enemy posts and enabling the advance of Australian . Wounded multiple times, including the loss of a leg from a on 23 June, Cutler refused evacuation and continued directing fire until physically unable to proceed, contributing decisively to the capture of objectives against superior defenses. His actions exemplified artillery-infantry cooperation in rugged terrain, where he was the only Australian gunner to receive the . Private James Hannah Gordon of the 2/31st Australian Infantry Battalion was awarded the for gallantry on the night of 9–10 July 1941 during the assault on Green Hill, north of , . When his company was pinned down by intense Vichy French machine-gun and grenade fire from entrenched positions, Gordon, on his own initiative, led his section forward through heavy shelling to outflank the enemy. He personally silenced two machine-gun posts with grenades and fire, then charged a third, killing the crew and capturing the weapon, which allowed his comrades to advance and secure the hill. His fearless leadership turned a stalled attack into a breakthrough, preventing further casualties and enabling the capture of , a critical defensive strongpoint in the valley. These were the only two Victoria Crosses awarded during the Syria–Lebanon campaign, both to Australian personnel serving under British command, highlighting individual resolve amid the campaign's unexpectedly fierce resistance from forces. Cutler's sustained efforts underscored the role of forward observation in overcoming fortified positions, while Gordon's initiative demonstrated infantry adaptability in close-quarters night fighting over contested heights. No other recipients were recognized at this level for the operation, though numerous Distinguished Service Orders and Military Crosses were granted for similar acts of bravery.

Long-Term Consequences and Evaluations

Strategic Gains: Securing the Middle East Flank

The successful conclusion of Operation Exporter on 14 July 1941, with the French signing an armistice, eliminated the immediate threat of Axis forces establishing bases in and , thereby securing the British Empire's flank against potential German incursions. Following the in May 1941, where pro-Axis elements had briefly seized power in , intelligence indicated authorities in had permitted aircraft to land and refuel, raising alarms over a possible German bridgehead that could outflank Allied positions in , Transjordan, and . By occupying key territories including (captured 21 June) and (entered 11 July), Allied forces under General denied the Axis such opportunities, protecting the —through which 80% of Britain's Middle Eastern oil supplies transited—and ensuring uninterrupted reinforcement routes to . Control of Syrian and Lebanese airfields, such as Rayak and , bolstered operations, providing forward bases to dominate the and interdict Axis shipping or reinforcements to Rommel's . The campaign also safeguarded the Iraq Petroleum Company's pipeline from through Syria to , which supplied approximately 4 million tons of oil annually to Allied refineries, averting disruptions that could have crippled . Although Vichy resistance inflicted over 5,000 Allied casualties, the strategic dividend outweighed these costs by neutralizing a regime amenable to Axis overtures, as evidenced by prior German-Vichy negotiations for Levantine concessions. In the broader context, securing this flank stabilized British holdings in and Persia, where similar pro-Axis unrest had been quelled, and facilitated Free French administration under General , though British troops retained de facto oversight to prevent de Gaulle's independent actions from compromising imperial interests. This outcome precluded any Axis thrust toward the oil fields or routes, preserving Allied dominance in the theatre amid the contemporaneous German invasion of the on 22 June 1941.

Political Ramifications: Tensions with Vichy and de Gaulle

The armistice concluded on July 14, 1941, between French commander and British-led Allied representatives in Acre granted relatively favorable terms to Vichy forces, including the option for troops to repatriate to or join Free French ranks while retaining certain honors and equipment; this arrangement, negotiated primarily by British authorities, drew sharp criticism from , who viewed it as excessively lenient toward Vichy collaborationists and a diminishment of Free French prestige in reclaiming the Mandate territories. De Gaulle protested vehemently to , accusing the British of colluding with Vichy elements and sidelining French sovereignty over and , which he regarded as integral to restoring France's imperial stature post-1940 defeat. Approximately 6,000 Vichy personnel ultimately defected to Free French service, but the terms fueled de Gaulle's resentment, as they allowed Vichy to portray the campaign as Anglo-Saxon aggression against fellow Frenchmen rather than a liberation by Gaullists. In the immediate aftermath, British deployment of General as head of the Levant political mission in September 1941 exacerbated frictions with de Gaulle; Spears, instructed by Churchill to prioritize local Arab aspirations for self-rule—in line with prior British pledges like the 1915 McMahon-Hussein correspondence—clashed directly with Free French Delegate-General , who administered the territories under de Gaulle's authority and sought to reintegrate them into a framework. De Gaulle interpreted Spears' presence and advocacy for Syrian and Lebanese electoral processes as an infringement on French Mandate rights, leading to acrimonious exchanges where he demanded British troop withdrawals and exclusive French oversight, while Churchill countered that Allied victory obligated safeguards against renewed French colonialism amid local nationalist stirrings. These disputes manifested in administrative dualism, with British forces retaining strategic enclaves and influence over ports like , prompting de Gaulle to decry a "second Fashoda"—evoking 1898 Anglo-French imperial rivalry—as Britain effectively subordinated French ambitions to broader Middle Eastern stability and anti-Axis priorities. Vichy government's response intensified diplomatic isolation, severing ties with Britain and leveraging the campaign in to depict de Gaulle as a British , though this masked Vichy's own Axis flirtations, such as permitting German air operations from Syrian bases earlier in 1941; the armistice's moderation, intended by Britain to encourage further defections elsewhere, instead hardened Pétain's regime's defiance until in November 1942. De Gaulle's integration of former units into Free French structures post-armistice, however, sowed internal distrust, as many officers harbored loyalties to the collaborationist regime, complicating efforts to unify French opposition abroad. Overall, these ramifications underscored irreconcilable Allied visions: Britain's pragmatic versus de Gaulle's insistence on unilateral French restoration, setting precedents for postwar conflicts in the region.

Criticisms and Debates: Necessity, Conduct, and Alternatives

The necessity of Operation Exporter has been debated among historians, with critics arguing that the perceived German threat to the was exaggerated and that Allied resources were diverted from more pressing theaters like . British leaders, including , justified the invasion on May 1941 intelligence suggesting German aircraft refueling in and potential paratroop landings similar to , following the pro-Axis Rashid Ali coup in earlier that month; however, post-war assessments indicate Germany had no concrete plans for a major Middle Eastern offensive via , as its focus shifted to on June 22, 1941. Historian David Sutton describes the campaign as a "Gaullist ," driven partly by Free French pressure from and , who overstated Vichy weakness to reclaim territory, despite limited evidence of imminent Axis exploitation of Syrian airfields for threats to the or Iraqi oil pipelines. Proponents counter that the operation preemptively secured Britain's Middle Eastern flank, preventing any opportunistic German foothold amid Vichy's nominal neutrality under the 1940 armistice terms allowing limited Axis transit. Criticisms of the campaign's conduct center on strategic and tactical shortcomings, including inadequate preparation and command decisions that prolonged fighting against a more resilient force than anticipated. General Archibald Wavell, commanding from distant , dispersed Allied forces across three prongs without tanks or sufficient artillery, misjudging the rugged terrain and defensive tactics under General , who employed counterattacks and fortified positions effectively with 35,000 professional troops, including Foreign Legion units and R-35 tanks. Australian troops, bearing disproportionate casualties (416 of approximately 1,000 Allied deaths), resented the lack of support and perceived Free French underperformance, with mid-campaign command changes—such as handing control to Lieutenant General John Lavarack on June 18—highlighting initial leadership flaws. Total estimated deaths reached 2,400 across both sides, a high cost for capturing on June 21 and forcing an on July 12, especially given Vichy's adherence to obligations rather than full Axis collaboration. Alternatives proposed in historical analyses include diplomatic overtures to authorities or limited border security measures rather than full invasion, potentially avoiding inter-Allied frictions and resource strain. Negotiations might have leveraged Vichy's reluctance for deeper German ties, as Dentz's forces fought primarily to uphold Franco-German armistice terms rather than ideologically align with the Axis, and British assurances of non-aggression could have neutralized airbase risks without combat. Some evaluations suggest bolstering Iraqi defenses post-coup or relying on would have sufficed, given Germany's logistical constraints and eastern priorities, sparing the 34,000 Allied troops committed and mitigating post-operation tensions with de Gaulle over Free French administration of the territories. These options, however, risked underestimating Vichy's potential to permit Axis staging, as evidenced by minor German refueling activities already underway.

Historiographical Perspectives: Overlooked Campaign and Lessons Learned

The Syria–Lebanon campaign, known as Operation Exporter, remains one of the least examined operations in , frequently characterized as a "forgotten war" due to its eclipse by larger-scale events like the German invasion of the on June 22, 1941. Its peripheral location in the Middle Eastern theater, combined with a relatively modest force commitment—approximately 34,000 Allied troops facing 35,000 French defenders—has confined detailed studies primarily to national military archives, such as records emphasizing the 7th Division's role, or specialized works on forces. This oversight contrasts with the campaign's empirical strategic value in preempting Axis exploitation of territories for air operations or troop staging against British holdings in , , and , as evidenced by prior German refueling incidents in during May 1941. Historians have increasingly reevaluated the French performance, challenging narratives of inherent French military incompetence post-1940 . Josh Cheatham, in a 2021 analysis, underscores the defenders' tactical resilience, including effective use of terrain for ambushes and counterattacks that prolonged resistance beyond initial Allied expectations of a swift capitulation. French accounts, such as those by Henry de Wailly, attribute this to professional leadership under General , who leveraged superior artillery and air assets to inflict disproportionate casualties, including a 25% loss rate among Allied commandos at the crossing on June 8, 1941. Such perspectives draw from primary sources like war diaries, revealing systemic biases in earlier Allied-centric histories that minimized Vichy effectiveness to bolster narratives of inevitable victory. David Sutton's 2022 study further highlights inter-Allied frictions, particularly British command dominance over Free French elements, as a factor complicating postwar recollections and contributing to the campaign's marginalization in French . Key lessons extracted include the critical role of terrain-adapted defensive preparations, as noted in the Australian 7th Division's after-action report: "The siting of the French defensive posts… was an object ." This underscores causal factors in prolonged engagements—mountainous barriers and river crossings amplified Vichy advantages in artillery spotting and infantry holds, necessitating Allied reliance on integration of infantry, armor, and air support for breakthroughs like the capture of Damascus on June 21, 1941. Strategically, the operation validated preemptive action against neutral or collaborationist regimes harboring Axis potential, securing the Middle Eastern flank at the cost of 5,348 Allied casualties against 4,421 French losses, though debates persist on whether diplomatic pressure on might have sufficed absent the Iraq revolt's demonstration of regional vulnerabilities. Overall, the campaign illustrates how localized proficiency can delay superior coalitions, informing later Allied planning for operations in rugged theaters like .

References

  1. https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/UN/UK/UK-Med-II/UK-Med-2-10.html
  2. https://www.awm.gov.au/wartime/95/article-one
  3. https://ww2days.com/lebanon-syria-plucked-from-axis-grip-2.html
  4. https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/E84669
  5. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/timeline/factfiles/nonflash/a1057565.shtml
  6. https://www.keymilitary.com/article/syria-and-lebanon-1941
  7. https://www.britannica.com/event/Conference-of-San-Remo
  8. https://uca.edu/politicalscience/home/research-projects/dadm-project/middle-eastnorth-africapersian-gulf-region/french-syria-1919-1946/
  9. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/French-Mandate-of-Syria-and-Lebanon.pdf
  10. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1921v01/d113
  11. https://www.britannica.com/place/Lebanon/French-mandate
  12. https://academic.oup.com/book/2425/chapter/142662039
  13. https://www.britannica.com/event/Druze-revolt
  14. https://www.fairobserver.com/world-news/europe-news/the-lebanese-phalanges-in-the-interwar-era/
  15. https://erf.org.eg/app/uploads/2022/11/1669718266_201_860061_1614.pdf
  16. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/battle-deir-ez-zor-july-1941
  17. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/baghdads-1941-regime/
  18. https://michaeltfassbender.com/nonfiction/the-world-wars/miscellaneous/an-overview-of-the-1941-coup-by-rashid-ali-in-iraq/
  19. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/timeline/factfiles/nonflash/a1126522.shtml
  20. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/wwii-the-nazi-march-on-baghdad/
  21. https://histclo.com/essay/war/ww2/camp/eur/fra/mil/vm-syr.html
  22. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/fighting-world-war-ii-in-the-middle-east/
  23. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/military-history-and-science/anglo-iraqi-war
  24. http://www.mhhv.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/David-Sutton-Syria-Lebanon.pdf
  25. https://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=98
  26. https://www.nytimes.com/1941/06/03/archives/british-set-lines-for-syrian-move-poised-for-drive-to-checkmate.html
  27. https://ww2days.com/allies-pluck-lebanon-syria-from-axis-grip.html
  28. https://codenames.info/operation/exporter-a/
  29. https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/an-army-reconsidered-vichy-frances-stubborn-defense-of-the-levant-in-the-second-world-war/
  30. http://foreignlegion.info/units/6th-foreign-infantry-regiment/
  31. https://www.persee.fr/doc/outre_0300-9513_1976_num_63_230_1895
  32. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=arts_article
  33. https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/E84318
  34. http://worldwartwodaily.filminspector.com/2018/03/june-8-1941-british-invade-syria.html
  35. https://www.asisbiz.com/Battles/Syria-Lebanon.html
  36. https://uboat.net/allies/warships/ship/6044.html
  37. https://www.nytimes.com/1941/06/22/archives/resistance-is-faltering.html
  38. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1941v03/d829
  39. https://www.britishmilitaryhistory.co.uk/docs-middle-east-1930-1947-syria-1941-1945/
  40. https://countrystudies.us/lebanon/21.htm
  41. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1941v03/d875
  42. https://anzacportal.dva.gov.au/stories/biographies/arthur-roden-cutler
  43. https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C984575
  44. https://vcgca.org/our-people/profile/1538/Sir-Arthur-Roden-CUTLER
  45. https://anzacportal.dva.gov.au/stories/biographies/james-hannah-gordon
  46. https://vcgca.org/our-people/profile/1481/james-hannah
  47. https://anzacmemorial.nsw.gov.au/our-stories/our-stories/syria-lebanon-campaign-june-july-1941
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232830135_De_Gaulle_and_the_question_of_Syria_and_Lebanon_during_the_Second_World_War_Part_I
  49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2639361
  50. https://www.foreignexchanges.news/p/today-in-middle-eastern-history-operation
  51. https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C2658965
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.