Hubbry Logo
search
logo
Jacques Maritain avatar
Jacques Maritain
Jacques Maritain
current hub
2175710

Jacques Maritain

logo
Community Hub0 Subscribers
Read side by side
Jacques Maritain
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Part of a series on
Catholic philosophy
  
Aquinas, Scotus and Ockham
Ethics
Metaphysics
Schools
Philosophers
Ancient
Medieval
Modern
Contemporary

Jacques Maritain (French: [ʒak maʁitɛ̃]; 18 November 1882 – 28 April 1973) was a French Catholic philosopher and theologian.

An author of more than 60 books, he helped to revive Thomas Aquinas for modern times, and was influential in the development and drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Pope Paul VI presented his "Message to Men of Thought and of Science" at the close of Vatican II to Maritain, his long-time friend and mentor. The same pope had seriously considered making him a lay cardinal, but Maritain rejected it.[1] Maritain's interest and works spanned many aspects of philosophy, including aesthetics, political theory, philosophy of science, metaphysics, the nature of education, liturgy and ecclesiology.

Life

[edit]

Maritain was born in Paris, the son of Paul Maritain, who was a lawyer, and his wife Geneviève Favre, the daughter of philosopher and educator Julie Favre and statesman and lawyer Jules Favre. His niece was librarian and Resistance member Éveline Garnier, who he later made his principal legatee and introduced to her life partner Andrée Jacob.[2][3][4] Maritain was reared in a liberal Protestant milieu. He was sent to the Lycée Henri-IV. Later, he attended the Sorbonne, studying the natural sciences: chemistry, biology and physics. At the Sorbonne, he met Raïssa Oumançoff, a Russian Jewish émigré. They married in 1904, but they made a private vow to abstain from sex.[5]

A noted poet and mystic, Raïssa participated as his intellectual partner in his search for truth. Raïssa's sister, Vera Oumançoff, lived with Jacques and Raïssa for almost all their married life. At the Sorbonne, Jacques and Raïssa soon became disenchanted with scientism, which could not, in their view, address the larger existential issues of life. In 1901, in light of this disillusionment, they made a pact to commit suicide together if they could not discover some deeper meaning to life within a year. They were spared from following through on this because, at the urging of Charles Péguy, they attended the lectures of Henri Bergson at the Collège de France. Bergson's critique of scientism dissolved their intellectual despair and instilled in them "the sense of the absolute." Then, through the influence of Léon Bloy, they converted to the Catholic faith in 1906.[6]

In the fall of 1907, the Maritains moved to Heidelberg, where Jacques studied biology under Hans Driesch. Hans Driesch's theory of neo-vitalism attracted Jacques because of its affinity with Henri Bergson. During this time, Raïssa fell ill, and during her convalescence, their spiritual advisor, a Dominican friar named Humbert Clérissac, introduced her to the writings of Thomas Aquinas. She read them with enthusiasm and, in turn, exhorted her husband to examine the saint's writings. In Thomas, Maritain found a number of insights and ideas that he had believed all along. He wrote:

Thenceforth, in affirming to myself, without chicanery or diminution, the authentic value of the reality of our human instruments of knowledge, I was already a Thomist without knowing it ... When several months later I came to the Summa Theologiae, I would construct no impediment to its luminous flood.

From the Angelic Doctor (the honorary title of Aquinas), he was led to "The Philosopher", as Aquinas called Aristotle. Still later, to further his intellectual development, he read the neo-Thomists. Beginning in 1912, Maritain taught at the Collège Stanislas. He later moved to the Institut Catholique de Paris. For the 1916–1917 academic year, he taught at the Petit Séminaire de Versailles. In 1930 Maritain and Étienne Gilson received honorary doctorates in philosophy from the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum.[7]

In 1933, Maritain gave his first lectures in North America in Toronto at the Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. He also taught at Columbia University; at the Committee on Social Thought, University of Chicago; at the University of Notre Dame, and at Princeton University. From 1945 to 1948, he was the French ambassador to the Holy See. Afterwards, Maritain returned to Princeton University. In 1952, he gave the inaugural A. W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts. Four years later, he achieved the "Elysian status" (as he put it) of a professor emeritus. Raïssa Maritain died in 1960. After her death, Jacques published her journal under the title "Raïssa's Journal." For several years Maritain was an honorary chairman of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, appearing as a keynote speaker at its 1960 conference in Berlin.[8]

From 1961, Maritain lived with the Little Brothers of Jesus in Toulouse, France. He had an influence on the order since its foundation in 1933 and became a Little Brother in 1970.[9] Maritain was also an oblate for the Order of Saint Benedict.[10] In a 1938 interview published by the Commonweal magazine, they asked if he was a freemason. Maritain replied:

That question offends me, for I should have a horror of belonging to Freemasonry. So much the worse for well-intentioned people whose anxiety and need for explanations would have been satisfied by believing me to be one.[11]

Jacques and Raïssa Maritain are buried in the cemetery of Kolbsheim, a little French village in Alsace where he had spent many summers at the estate of his friends, Antoinette and Alexander Grunelius.[12]

Tomb of Raïssa and Jacques Maritain

Work

[edit]

The foundation of Maritain's thought is Aristotle, Aquinas, and the Thomistic commentators, especially John of St. Thomas. He is eclectic in his use of these sources. Maritain's philosophy is based on evidence accrued by the senses and acquired by an understanding of first principles. Maritain defended philosophy as a science against those who would degrade it, and promoted philosophy as the "queen of sciences". In 1910, Jacques Maritain completed his first contribution to modern philosophy, a 28-page article titled, "Reason and Modern Science" published in Revue de Philosophie (June issue). In it, he warned that science was becoming a divinity, its methodology usurping the role of reason and philosophy, supplanting the humanities.[13]

In 1917, a committee of French bishops commissioned Jacques to write a series of textbooks to be used in Catholic colleges and seminaries. He wrote and completed only one of these projects, titled Elements de Philosophie (Introduction of Philosophy) in 1920. It has been a standard text ever since in many Catholic seminaries. He wrote in his introduction:

If the philosophy of Aristotle, as revived and enriched by Thomas Aquinas and his school, may rightly be called the Christian philosophy, both because the church is never weary of putting it forward as the only true philosophy and because it harmonizes perfectly with the truths of faith, nevertheless it is proposed here for the reader's acceptance not because it is Christian, but because it is demonstrably true. This agreement between a philosophic system founded by a pagan and the dogmas of revelation is no doubt an external sign, an extra-philosophic guarantee of its truth; but from its own rational evidence, it derives its authority as a philosophy.

During the Second World War, Jacques Maritain protested the policies of the Vichy government while teaching at the Pontifical Institute for Medieval Studies in Canada. "Moving to New York, Maritain became deeply involved in rescue activities, seeking to bring persecuted and threatened academics, many of them Jews, to America. He was instrumental in founding the École Libre des Hautes Études, a kind of university in exile that was, at the same time, the centre of Gaullist resistance in the United States". After the war, in a papal audience on 16 July 1946, he tried unsuccessfully to have Pope Pius XII officially denounce antisemitism.[14]

Many of his American papers are held by the University of Notre Dame, which established The Jacques Maritain Center in 1957. The Cercle d'Etudes Jacques & Raïssa Maritain is an association founded by the philosopher himself in 1962 in Kolbsheim (near Strasbourg, France), where the couple is also buried. The purpose of these centres is to encourage study and research of Maritain's thoughts and expand upon them. It is also absorbed in translating and editing his writings.

Metaphysics and epistemology

[edit]

Maritain's philosophy is based on the view that metaphysics is prior to epistemology. Being is first apprehended implicitly in sense experience, and is known in two ways. First, being is known reflexively by abstraction from sense experience. One experiences a particular being, e.g. a cup, a dog, etc. and through reflection ("bending back") on the judgement, e.g. "this is a dog", one recognizes that the object in question is an existent. Second, in light of attaining being reflexively through apprehension of sense experience, one may arrive at what Maritain calls "an Intuition of Being". For Maritain this is the point of departure for metaphysics; without the intuition of being one cannot be a metaphysician at all. The intuition of being involves rising to the apprehension of ens secundum quod est ens (being insofar as it is a being). In Existence and the Existent, he explains:

"It is being, attained or perceived at the summit of an abstractive intellection, of an eidetic or intensive visualization which owes its purity and power of illumination only to the fact that the intellect, one day, was stirred to its depths and trans-illuminated by the impact of the act of existing apprehended in things, and because it was quickened to the point of receiving this act, or hearkening to it, within itself, in the intelligible and super-intelligible integrity of the tone particular to it." (p. 20)

In view of this priority given to metaphysics, Maritain advocates an epistemology he calls "Critical Realism". Maritain's epistemology is not "critical" in Kant's sense, which held that one could only know anything after undertaking a thorough critique of one's cognitive abilities. Rather, it is critical in the sense that it is not a naive or non-philosophical realism, but one that is defended by way of reason. Against Kant's critical project, Maritain argues that epistemology is reflexive; you can only defend a theory of knowledge in light of knowledge you have already attained. Consequently, the critical question is not the question of modern philosophy – how do we pass from what is perceived to what is? Rather, "Since the mind, from the very start, reveals itself as warranted in its certitude by things and measured by an esse [the Latin verb 'to be', Aquinas' preferred term for 'existence'], independent of itself, how are we to judge if, how, on what conditions, and to what extent it is so both in principle and in the various moments of knowledge?"

In contrast, idealism inevitably ends up in contradiction, since it does not recognize the universal scope of the first principles of identity, contradiction, and finality. These become merely laws of thought or language, but not of being, which opens the way to contradictions being instantiated in reality. Maritain's metaphysics ascends from this account of being to a critique of the philosophical aspects of modern science, through analogy to an account of the existence and nature of God as it is known philosophically and through mystical experience.

Ethics

[edit]

Maritain was a strong defender of a natural law ethics. He viewed ethical norms as being rooted in human nature. For Maritain, the natural law is known primarily, not through philosophical argument and demonstration, but rather through "Connaturality". Connatural knowledge is a kind of knowledge by acquaintance. We know the natural law through our direct acquaintance with it in our human experience. Of central importance, is Maritain's argument that natural rights are rooted in the natural law. This was key to his involvement in the drafting of the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Another important aspect of his ethics was his insistence upon the need for moral philosophy to be conducted in a theological context. While a Christian could engage in speculative thought about nature or metaphysics in a purely rational manner and develop an adequate philosophy of nature of metaphysics, this is not possible with ethics. Moral philosophy must address the actual state of the human person, and this is a person in a state of grace. Thus, "moral philosophy adequately considered" must take into account properly theological truths. It would be impossible, for instance, to develop an adequate moral philosophy without giving consideration to proper theological facts such as original sin and the supernatural end of the human person in beatitude. Any moral philosophy that does not take into account these realities that are only known through faith would be fundamentally incomplete.[15]

Political theory

[edit]
Part of a series on
Christian democracy
Principles
Philosophers
Politicians
Parties
Organizations
Documents
Related topics

Maritain corresponded with, and was a friend of,[16] the American radical community organizer Saul Alinsky,[17] as well as French Prime Minister Robert Schuman.[18] In the study The Radical Vision of Saul Alinsky, author P. David Finks noted that "For years Jacques Maritain had spoken approvingly to Montini of the democratic community organizations built by Saul Alinsky". Accordingly, in 1958 Maritain arranged for a series of meetings between Alinsky and Archbishop Montini in Milan. Before the meetings, Maritain had written to Alinsky: "the new cardinal was reading Saul’s books and would contact him soon".[19]

Integral Humanism

[edit]

Maritain advocated what he called "Integral Humanism" (or "Integral Christian Humanism").[20] He argued that secular forms of humanism were inevitably anti-human in that they refused to recognize the whole person. Once the spiritual dimension of human nature is rejected, we no longer have an integral, but merely partial humanism, one which rejects a fundamental aspect of the human person. Accordingly, in Integral Humanism he explores the prospects for a new Christendom, rooted in his philosophical pluralism, in order to find ways Christianity could inform political discourse and policy in a pluralistic age. In this account he develops a theory of cooperation, to show how people of different intellectual positions can nevertheless cooperate to achieve common practical aims. Maritain's political theory was extremely influential and was a primary source behind the Christian Democratic movement.[citation needed]

Global policy

[edit]

Along with Albert Einstein, Maritain was one of the sponsors of the Peoples' World Convention (PWC), also known as Peoples' World Constituent Assembly (PWCA), which took place in 1950–51 at Palais Electoral, Geneva, Switzerland.[21][22]

Legacy

[edit]

Praise

[edit]

Citing the Integral humanism of Jacques Maritain's L'humanisme intégral, Pope Paul VI declared in Populorum progressio that the "ultimate goal is a full-bodied humanism".[23] Senator John F. Kennedy (later President of the United States), once quoted Maritain in a 1955 address to Assumption College.[24] In an interview from 2016, Pope Francis praised Maritain among a small list of French liberal thinkers.[25] American president Joe Biden has cited Maritain as immensely influential in his thinking.[26]

Criticism

[edit]

Major criticisms of Maritain have included:

  1. Spanish Dominican theologian Santiago Ramírez argued that Maritain's moral philosophy, adequately considered, could not be distinguished in any meaningful way from moral theology as such.[27]
  2. Tracey Rowland, a theologian at the University of Notre Dame (Australia), has argued that the lack of a fully developed philosophy of culture in Maritain and others (notably Rahner) was responsible for an inadequate notion of culture in the documents of Vatican II and thereby for much of the misapplication of the conciliar texts in the life of the church following the council.[28]
  3. Maritain's political theory has been criticized for a democratic pluralism that appeals to something very similar to the later liberal philosopher John Rawls' conception of an overlapping consensus of reasonable views. It is argued that such a view illegitimately presupposes the necessity of pluralistic conceptions of the human good.[29]

Catholic philosopher and historian Thomas Molnar, who praised Maritain as "a man of charity", also wrote that Maritain's work contained "baffling paradoxes". Molnar said that while Maritain's philosophy was "Orthodox and Thomist", he nonetheless unfortunately had "occasional excursions into strange semi-spiritual lands."[30] Catholic political theorist Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn wrote that "Maritain knew a lot about theology, he was a philosopher, and he knew something about biology, but he knew next to nothing about politics and economics."[31] Catholic philosopher Alice von Hildebrand referred to Maritain as "treasonous" and criticized his negative views on Engelbert Dollfuss, whom Maritain had spoken of positively in the past, but later became critical of.[32]

Veneration

[edit]

A cause for beatification of him and his wife Raïssa was being planned in 2011.[33] Since then, there have been no advancements in the case.

Sayings

[edit]
  • "Vae mihi si non Thomistizavero" [Woe to me if I do not Thomisticize].[34]
  • "Je n'adore que Dieu" [I adore only God].
  • "The artist pours out his creative spirit into a work; the philosopher measures his knowing spirit by the real."
  • "I do not know if Saul Alinsky knows God. But I assure you that God knows Saul Alinsky."
  • "We do not need a truth to serve us, we need a truth that we can serve"

Writings

[edit]

Significant works in English

[edit]
  • Introduction to Philosophy, Christian Classics, Inc., Westminster, Md., 1st. 1930, 1991
  • The Degrees of Knowledge, orig. 1932
  • Integral Humanism, orig. 1936
  • An Introduction to Logic (1937)
  • A Preface To Metaphysics (1939) (1939)
  • Education at the Crossroads, engl. 1942
  • Redeeming the Time 1943
  • The Person and the Common Good, fr. 1947
  • Art and Scholasticism with other essays, Sheed and Ward, London, 1947
  • Existence and the Existent, (fr. 1947) trans. by Lewis Galantiere and Gerald B. Phelan, Image Books division of Doubleday & Co., Inc., Garden City, N.Y., 1948, Image book, 1956. ISBN 978-0-8371-8078-6
  • Philosophy of Nature (1951)
  • The Range of Reason, engl. 1952
  • Approaches to God, engl. 1954
  • Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry, engl. 1953
  • Man and The State, (orig.) University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1951
  • A Preface to Metaphysics, engl. 1962
  • God and the Permission of Evil, trans. Joseph W. Evans, The Bruce Publishing Company, Milwaukee, Wisc., 1966 (orig. 1963)
  • Moral Philosophy, 1964
  • The Peasant of the Garonne, An Old Layman Questions Himself about the Present Time, trans. Michael Cuddihy and Elizabeth Hughes, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, N.Y., 1968; orig. 1966
  • The Education of Man, The Educational Philosophy of Jacques Maritain., ed. D./I. Gallagher, Notre Dame/Ind. 1967

Other works in English

[edit]
  • Religion and Culture (1931)
  • The Things that are Not Caesar's (1931)
  • Theonas; Conversations of a Sage (1933)
  • Freedom in the Modern World (1935)
  • True Humanism (1938) (Integral Humanism, 1968)
  • A Christian Looks at the Jewish Question (1939)
  • The Twilight of Civilization (1939)
  • Scholasticism and Politics, New York (1940)
  • Science and Wisdom (1940)
  • Religion and the Modern World (1941)
  • France, My Country Through the Disaster (1941)
  • The Living Thoughts of St. Paul (1941)
  • Ransoming the Time (1941)
  • Christian Humanism (1942)
  • Saint Thomas and the problem of evil, Milwaukee (1942)
  • Essays in Thomism, New York (1942)
  • The Rights of Man and Natural Law (1943)
  • Prayer and Intelligence (1943)
  • Give John a Sword (1944)
  • The Dream of Descartes (1944)
  • Christianity and Democracy (1944)
  • Messages 1941–1944, New York 1945
  • A Faith to Live by (1947)
  • The Person and the Common Good (1947)
  • Art & Faith (with Jean Cocteau 1951)
  • The Pluralist Principle in Democracy (1952)
  • Creative Intuition in Art and History (1953)
  • An Essay on Christian Philosophy (1955)
  • The Situation of Poetry with Raïssa Maritain, 1955)
  • Bergsonian Philosophy (1955)
  • Reflections on America (1958)
  • St. Thomas Aquinas (1958)
  • The Degrees of Knowledge (1959)
  • The Sin of the Angel: An Essay on a Re-interpretation of some Thomistic Positions (1959)
  • Liturgy and Contemplation (1960)
  • The Responsibility of the Artist (1960)
  • On the Use of Philosophy (1961)
  • God and the Permission of Evil (1966)
  • Challenges and Renewals, ed. J.W. Evans/L.R. Ward, Notre Dame/Ind. (1966)
  • On the Grace and Humanity of Jesus (1969)
  • On the Church of Christ: The Person of the Church and her Personnel (1973)
  • Notebooks (1984)
  • Natural Law: reflections on theory and practice (ed. with Introductions and notes, by William Sweet), St. Augustine's Press [distributed by University of Chicago Press] (2001; Second printing, corrected, 2003)

Original works in French

[edit]
  • La philosophie bergsonienne, 1914 (1948)
  • Eléments de philosophie, 2 volumes, Paris 1920/23
  • Art et scolastique, 1920
  • Théonas ou les entretiens d’un sage et de deux philosophes sur diverses matières inégalement actuelles, Paris, Nouvelle librairie nationale, 1921
  • Antimoderne, Paris, Édition de la Revue des Jeunes, 1922
  • Réflexions sur l’intelligence et sur sa vie propre, Paris, Nouvelle librairie nationale, 1924
  • Trois réformateurs : Luther, Descartes, Rousseau, avec six portraits, Paris [Plon], 1925 (English version)
  • Réponse à Jean Cocteau, 1926
  • Une opinion sur Charles Maurras et le devoir des catholiques, Paris [Plon], 1926
  • Primauté du spirituel, 1927
  • Pourquoi Rome a parlé (coll.), Paris, Spes, 1927
  • Quelques pages sur Léon Bloy, Paris 1927
  • Clairvoyance de Rome (coll.), Paris, Spes, 1929
  • Le docteur angélique, Paris, Paul Hartmann, 1929
  • Religion et culture, Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 1930 (1946)
  • Le thomisme et la civilisation, 1932
  • Distinguer pour unir ou Les degrés du savoir, Paris 1932
  • Le songe de Descartes, Suivi de quelques essais, Paris 1932
  • De la philosophie chrétienne, Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 1933
  • Du régime temporel et de la liberté, Paris, DDB, 1933
  • Sept leçons sur l'être et les premiers principes de la raison spéculative, Paris 1934
  • Frontières de la poésie et autres essais, Paris 1935
  • La philosophie de la nature, Essai critique sur ses frontières et son objet, Paris 1935 (1948)
  • Lettre sur l’indépendance, Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 1935.
  • Science et sagesse, Paris 1935
  • Humanisme intégral. Problèmes temporels et spirituels d'une nouvelle chrétienté; zunächst spanisch 1935), Paris (Fernand Aubier), 1936 (1947)
  • Les Juifs parmi les nations, Paris, Cerf, 1938
  • Situation de la Poesie, 1938
  • Questions de conscience : essais et allocutions, Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 1938
  • La personne humaine et la societé, Paris 1939
  • Le crépuscule de la civilisation, Paris, Éd. Les Nouvelles Lettres, 1939
  • Quattre essais sur l'ésprit dans sa condition charnelle, Paris 1939 (1956)
  • De la justice politique, Notes sur le présente guerre, Paris 1940
  • A travers le désastre, New York 1941 (1946)
  • Conféssion de foi, New York 1941
  • La pensée de St.Paul, New York 1941 (Paris 1947)
  • Les Droits de l'Homme et la Loi naturelle, New York 1942 (Paris 1947)
  • Christianisme et démocratie, New York 1943 (Paris 1945)
  • Principes d'une politique humaniste, New York 1944 (Paris 1945);
  • De Bergson à Thomas d'Aquin, Essais de Métaphysique et de Morale, New York 1944 (Paris 1947)
  • A travers la victoire, Paris 1945;
  • Pour la justice, Articles et discours 1940–1945, New York 1945;
  • Le sort de l'homme, Neuchâtel 1945;
  • Court traité de l'existence et de l'existant, Paris 1947;
  • La personne et le bien commun, Paris 1947;
  • Raison et raisons, Essais détachés, Paris 1948
  • La signification de l'athéisme contemporain, Paris 1949
  • Neuf leçons sur les notions premières de la philosophie morale, Paris 1951
  • Approaches de Dieu, Paris 1953.
  • L'Homme et l'Etat (engl.: Man and State, 1951) Paris, PUF, 1953
  • Pour une philosophie de l'éducation, Paris 1959
  • Le philosophe dans la Cité, Paris 1960
  • La philosophie morale, Vol. I: Examen historique et critique des grands systèmes, Paris 1960
  • Dieu et la permission du mal, 1963
  • Carnet de notes, Paris, DDB, 1965
  • L'intuition créatrice dans l'art et dans la poésie, Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 1966 (engl. 1953)
  • Le paysan de la Garonne. Un vieux laïc s’interroge à propos du temps présent, Paris, DDB, 1966
  • De la grâce et de l'humanité de Jésus, 1967
  • De l'Église du Christ. La personne de l'église et son personnel, Paris 1970
  • Approaches sans entraves, posthum 1973
  • La loi naturelle ou loi non écrite, texte inédit, établi par Georges Brazzola. Fribourg, Suisse: Éditions universitaires, 1986. [Lectures on Natural Law. Tr. William Sweet. In The Collected Works of Jacques Maritain, Vol. VI, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, (forthcoming)]
  • Oeuvres complètes de Jacques et Raïssa Maritain, 16 Bde., 1982–1999

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Jacques Maritain

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Jacques Maritain (November 18, 1882 – April 28, 1973) was a French Catholic philosopher and political theorist, recognized as one of the foremost exponents of Thomism—the philosophical system of Thomas Aquinas—in the twentieth century, whose writings bridged medieval scholasticism with contemporary issues in metaphysics, epistemology, aesthetics, and social philosophy.[1] Born in Paris to a Protestant family, Maritain initially pursued studies in biology and philosophy at the Sorbonne, where he encountered Henri Bergson's vitalism, but a profound spiritual crisis led him and his wife Raïssa to convert to Catholicism in 1906 under the influence of writers like Léon Bloy and guidance from Dominican friars, marking the start of his lifelong engagement with Aquinas's thought.[1][2] His central contribution, integral humanism as expounded in Humanisme intégral (1936), proposed a vision of human flourishing that integrates spiritual ends with temporal progress, advocating pluralistic democracies rooted in natural law while rejecting both liberal individualism divorced from moral order and totalitarian ideologies like communism and fascism.[1][2] Maritain's political engagement included serving as France's ambassador to the Holy See from 1945 to 1948 and providing philosophical foundations for human rights through natural law theory, which influenced the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights by enabling consensus among diverse worldviews on the person's inherent dignity.[1][3] In his later years, teaching at institutions like Princeton and Columbia, he critiqued overly optimistic views of modernity and certain post-Vatican II liturgical and theological shifts in Le paysan de la Garonne (1966), reaffirming a robust, metaphysically grounded Thomism against relativism and subjectivism.[1]

Biography

Early Life and Education

Jacques Maritain was born on November 18, 1882, in Paris, specifically on the rue Moncey in the northwest of the city.[2] He was the son of Paul Maritain, a prominent lawyer, and Geneviève Favre, daughter of the French statesman and republican Jules Favre.[1] His parents divorced shortly after his birth, and he was raised primarily by his mother in a freethinking, liberal Protestant milieu marked by anticlericalism and socialist leanings; his mother held atheistic views and envisioned a future led by an intellectual elite.[4] [2] Maritain's childhood was turbulent, involving frequent moves due to family inheritance disputes and his mother's work as a translator, which left him without a stable home.[2] Maritain received his early education in secular Parisian lycées, including the Lycée Henri IV beginning in 1898, where he was exposed to empiricism and socialist ideas.[4] In 1901, he enrolled at the Sorbonne, initially studying the natural sciences—such as chemistry, biology, and physics—before shifting toward philosophy.[1] There, he earned a licence in philosophy and encountered the works of Baruch Spinoza, while attending lectures by Henri Bergson at the Collège de France in 1903–1904, whose philosophy of intuition challenged the positivism dominant in scientific studies and profoundly shaped his early intellectual development.[1] During his time at the Sorbonne, Maritain met Raïssa Oumansoff, a Russian Jewish immigrant studying philosophy, with whom he shared interests in morality, art, and social issues; the two married in 1904 after overcoming periods of existential despair.[4] This phase also included formative friendships, such as with Ernest Psichari, grandson of the scholar Ernest Renan, which reinforced his commitment to rigorous intellectual pursuits amid a backdrop of spiritual searching.[2]

Conversion to Catholicism

Jacques Maritain, raised in a Protestant yet free-thinking family environment, experienced a profound spiritual and intellectual crisis in his early twenties, contemplating suicide amid the perceived meaninglessness of a materialist worldview.[5] This despair was alleviated through attendance at lectures by philosopher Henri Bergson at the Collège de France, whose ideas on intuition and creative evolution provided a sense of purpose and prompted Maritain and his fiancée Raïssa Oumançoff to abandon suicidal thoughts.[1] They married in a civil ceremony on November 5, 1904.[6] In 1904, the couple encountered the Catholic writer Léon Bloy, whose fervent piety and uncompromising critique of modern secularism profoundly impacted them. Bloy, living in voluntary poverty, exemplified a radical Christian witness that transcended abstract argumentation, drawing the Maritains toward Catholicism through personal friendship and lived example rather than systematic theology.[6] [5] Raïssa's sister, Vera, also joined their spiritual journey, and the group engaged in discussions of Catholic doctrine under Bloy's guidance. Bloy's influence emphasized the primacy of divine friendship and holy poverty, which ultimately resolved the Maritains' existential doubts.[7] On June 11, 1906, Jacques and Raïssa Maritain, along with Vera, were received into the Catholic Church through baptism at the church of Saint-Jean-l'Évangéliste in Paris, with Léon Bloy serving as godfather to Raïssa.[8] This conversion marked a decisive break from their prior agnosticism, driven by personal encounter rather than philosophical deduction alone, though Maritain later integrated it with Thomistic thought.[1] The event reflected Bloy's role in catalyzing a faith rooted in experiential authenticity over intellectual abstraction.[5]

Academic Career in France

In 1912, Maritain commenced his formal academic teaching as professor of philosophy at the Lycée Stanislas (also known as Collège Stanislas) in Paris, a prominent Catholic secondary institution.[1] Concurrently, he delivered lectures at the Institut Catholique de Paris, a leading ecclesiastical university focused on Thomistic studies and modern philosophy.[1] Appointed assistant professor at the Institut Catholique in 1914—initially attached to the chair of the history of modern philosophy—Maritain's role expanded amid World War I, from which he was exempted due to health concerns, allowing him to maintain his pedagogical commitments.[1][2] By 1919, he secured the full chair in the history of modern philosophy there, advancing to tenured professor in 1921, a position he retained until 1939.[9][10] Throughout the interwar period, Maritain's lectures emphasized neo-Thomism, integrating Aristotelian metaphysics with contemporary issues in epistemology and ethics, attracting students and intellectuals seeking alternatives to secular rationalism and Bergsonian intuitionism.[1] His tenure coincided with the publication of seminal works like Art et scolastique (1920) and Éléments de philosophie (1920–1923), which reinforced his reputation as a bridge between medieval scholasticism and modern thought, though his influence extended beyond classrooms through seminars and Thomist study circles.[1] By the late 1930s, political tensions in France, including his opposition to fascism and communism, began overshadowing pure academics, culminating in his departure as German forces advanced in 1940.[1]

Exile, American Period, and Later Years

In 1940, following the fall of France to Nazi Germany, Maritain, who had been exempted from military service due to health reasons during World War I and held a teaching position at the Institut Catholique de Paris, fled to the United States as part of a planned lecture tour that extended into prolonged exile.[11][2] Upon arriving in New York, he engaged in rescue efforts to aid persecuted intellectuals, including many Jewish academics, in relocating to safety.[12] During his American period from 1940 to around 1960, Maritain held visiting professorships at several institutions, including Columbia University, where he contributed to the Maison Française's founding, and Princeton University, delivering a graduate course on medieval philosophy three days a week from 1941 to 1942 and later teaching full-time from 1948 to 1952.[13][14] He also lectured at the University of Chicago's Committee on Social Thought and the University of Notre Dame, promoting Thomistic philosophy amid wartime and postwar intellectual circles.[10] Maritain's writings during this era, such as expansions on democratic theory rooted in natural law, defended pluralism and human rights as compatible with Christian principles, influencing American Catholic thought and the broader defense of liberal democracy against totalitarianism.[15] As French ambassador to the Vatican from 1945 to 1948, he advocated for the philosophical underpinnings of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), emphasizing natural law foundations while acknowledging diverse rationales for agreement among signatories; though not a drafter, his ideas shaped its ethical framework through consultations with figures like Charles Malik.[16][17] After the death of his wife Raïssa in November 1960, following her sister's passing in Princeton in 1959, Maritain returned permanently to France and joined the Little Brothers of Jesus, a contemplative religious community in Toulouse, where he lived in monastic simplicity for the final 12 years of his life.[18] He continued limited scholarly work but largely withdrew from public life, reflecting on personalism and spirituality until his death from a heart attack on April 28, 1973, at age 90.[19] Maritain was buried alongside Raïssa at the Kolbsheim Charterhouse in Alsace.[2]

Philosophical Foundations

Metaphysics and Ontology

Jacques Maritain's metaphysics adheres closely to the Thomistic tradition, defining it as the science of being qua being (ens commune), which examines the most universal principles applicable to all reality. This approach contrasts with modern philosophies that prioritize subjectivity or phenomena, insisting instead on the objective primacy of existence as the foundation of intelligibility. In his Preface to Metaphysics (1934), Maritain outlines ontology as an inquiry into the act of existing (esse), which perfects and actualizes essence, rendering things real.[1] Central to Maritain's ontology is the real distinction between essence and existence in finite beings: essence denotes the "whatness" or potency of a thing, while existence is its actualizing act, received participatively from God, whose essence is subsistent existence itself. This participatory structure underpins the analogy of being, where terms like "being" and "good" are predicated proportionally across creatures and Creator, avoiding both the univocity critiqued in Duns Scotus and pure equivocity. Maritain defends this analogical framework against idealist reductions, arguing it preserves the transcendence of divine being while affirming created realities' genuine ontological density.[1] Access to these principles occurs through the intuition of being, an immediate intellectual perception of existence as dynamic act, "pregnant with all perfections." Distinct from abstractive conceptualization or sensory intuition, this non-discursive grasp—evident in common sense yet elevated in metaphysics—serves as the starting point for ontological reflection, enabling recognition of being's inexhaustible mystery. Maritain elaborates this in works like Existence and the Existent (1947), where he advances an "existential Thomism" that prioritizes esse over essentialism, countering atheistic existentialisms by integrating existence within a realist, theocentric ontology.[1]

Epistemology and Degrees of Knowledge

Jacques Maritain's epistemology, rooted in Thomism, advocates critical realism, wherein the human intellect directly apprehends the essences of things, rendering knowledge identical to the intelligible reality it grasps, rather than a mere representation or subjective construct.[1] This position contrasts with modern epistemologies like Cartesian indirect realism by affirming that the act of knowing involves the immaterial existence of the object's essence in the mind, grounded in the convertibility of being and truth.[4] Maritain critiques nominalism and idealism for severing knowledge from ontological reality, insisting instead on a realist framework where abstraction preserves the object's identity.[1] In his 1932 work Distinguish to Unite, or The Degrees of Knowledge (English translation 1937), Maritain systematically distinguishes various orders and degrees of knowledge to reveal their hierarchical unity, determined by the nature and intelligibility of the objects known.[20] Rational knowledge, comprising science and philosophy, operates through three degrees of abstraction: the first, focused on sensible essences via empirical observation (as in natural sciences); the second, involving physico-mathematical constructs abstracted from individual matter yet retaining quantitative ties to it; and the third, metaphysical wisdom grasping immaterial being, substance, and the divine through ananoetic intuition beyond sensory dependence.[21] These degrees ascend in purity and universality, with higher levels presupposing and perfecting lower ones, ensuring a coherent progression from particular to universal truths.[1] Beyond rational modes, Maritain delineates supra-rational orders, including theological knowledge by faith and mystical experience, which transcend discursive reason yet integrate with it.[20] Central to his framework is knowledge by connaturality—a non-conceptual, intuitive grasp arising from an intrinsic affinity or sympathy between knower and known, operative in domains like ethics, aesthetics, and spirituality where abstract reasoning alone suffices not.[22] For instance, moral virtues enable connatural discernment of the good, complementing speculative knowledge without supplanting it, thus preserving the analogical richness of human cognition.[1] This holistic epistemology underscores Maritain's conviction that full wisdom demands harmonizing diverse epistemic faculties under the primacy of intellectual intuition and divine illumination.[20]

Ethics and Personalism

Maritain's ethics derive from Thomistic natural law theory, which posits an objective moral order grounded in divine eternal law and discernible by human reason independent of supernatural revelation.[1] This framework emphasizes virtues as habits disposing the person toward the good, with moral acts judged by their conformity to this rational order rather than subjective intentions alone. Maritain taught that the deficient cause of sin (moral evil) is the voluntary "non-consideration" of the rule (the moral rule of reason or divine law), which he describes as a "mera negatio" (mere negation or mere absence). This non-consideration is not a positive act or evil in itself but a negation permitting the will to turn toward mutable goods, leading to sin. God permits this in His providence, relating to predestination by granting efficacious grace to some for consideration of the rule while permitting non-consideration in others.[23] He critiqued modern ethical relativism, arguing that ethical truths are universal and rooted in the nature of being, countering both utilitarian consequentialism and Kantian deontology by integrating teleology with respect for human dignity.[24] Central to Maritain's thought is Thomistic personalism, which elevates the human person as a subsistent spiritual substance possessing incommunicable dignity by participation in divine being.[25] Unlike the biological individual, defined by mere corporeal existence and closed self-interest, the person is inherently relational, ordered to self-gift and communion through intellect and will.[26] In The Person and the Common Good (1947), Maritain resolves apparent tensions between personal rights and societal demands by asserting that the person's perfection occurs in subsidiarity to the common good, where individual freedoms serve communal flourishing without subsuming the person's transcendent end.[27] This personalist ethic rejects both atomistic individualism and totalitarian collectivism, advocating a humanism where persons are ends in themselves yet fulfilled in social bonds.[28] Maritain applied personalism to human rights, contending that rights stem from the person's ontological dignity—imago Dei—rather than positive law or social contract, but must align with natural law duties toward the common good.[29] He influenced the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights preamble, emphasizing spiritual foundations over secular individualism, while warning against rights detached from moral realism.[30] Ethically, this entails a commitment to truth, charity, and justice, with personal responsibility extending to political and cultural spheres, as seen in his advocacy for pluralistic societies respecting conscience yet oriented by objective good.[31] Critics note potential tensions in balancing personal autonomy with communal priorities, yet Maritain maintained that true personalism integrates both through grace-enabled reason.[32]

Philosophy of Culture and Arts

Views on Beauty and Creativity

Maritain viewed beauty as an objective, transcendental property of being, defined in Thomistic terms as id quod visum placet ("that which, being seen, pleases"), requiring three essential conditions: integrity (wholeness), proportion (harmony of parts), and clarity or radiance (splendor of form shining through matter).[33] This splendor of form constitutes beauty's metaphysical root, manifesting a spiritual intelligibility that participates in divine brightness and aligns with the transcendentals of truth and goodness, rather than subjective sensation or mere sensory pleasure.[33] Beauty thus transcends the material, delighting the intellect via sensory intuition while reflecting the objective order of created reality.[33] In Art and Scholasticism (1920), Maritain applied this to aesthetics, asserting that the fine arts are inherently ordered to beauty as their absolute end—a self-sufficing delight of the spirit achieved through the creation of form in sensible matter, not through imitation, utility, or emotional expression.[33] Art, as an intellectual virtue in the practical order (recta ratio factibilium, or right reason of things to be made), imitates God's creative act by manifesting the radiance of being, subordinating technique to the exigencies of form and elevating the work toward eternal laws of proportion and intelligibility.[33] He critiqued modern subjectivism in art, insisting that true beauty emerges from adherence to objective reality and divine order, as exemplified in medieval Christian works where form reflects not mere representation but spiritual transfiguration.[33] Maritain's account of creativity emphasized intuitive knowledge over discursive reason, particularly in Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry (1953), where he described artistic creation as originating in a "poetic intuition"—a non-conceptual, connatural grasp of essences arising from the artist's spiritual preconscious life.[34] This intuition, akin to a Platonic inspiration internalized in the soul, enables the artist to participate analogously in divine creativity, seizing images as vehicles for intelligible realities and engendering forms in beauty's infinite possibilities.[35] Unlike speculative knowledge, it operates freely in the realm of the possible, reconciling spontaneous inspiration with disciplined technique: the artist's "technical reason" must serve this intuitive core, avoiding both rationalistic sterility and formless effusion.[34] Through this process, creativity reveals the "nonconceptual life of the intellect," bridging the artist's inner vision with universal being and countering modernist fragmentation by rooting invention in ontological depth.[34]

Educational Theory

Jacques Maritain's educational theory, deeply rooted in Thomistic philosophy, emphasizes the integral formation of the human person as a unified being comprising body, intellect, and spirit, oriented toward wisdom and ultimate union with God.[36] Drawing from Thomas Aquinas, Maritain posits that true education must recognize the person's spiritual and metaphysical dimensions, distinguishing yet uniting the individual (as subsistent) and the person (as relational and free).[36] This approach counters reductionist views by prioritizing the cultivation of intellectual virtues, moral character, and contemplative pursuits over mere vocational training or empirical problem-solving.[37] Central to his principles is the idea of education as a process of liberating the person through knowledge, wisdom, and love, fostering internal freedom and respect for human dignity.[36] Maritain advocates for pluralism in education, accommodating personal uniqueness while promoting coexistence through shared cultural values like truth, beauty, and goodness.[36] He envisions a pedagogy of culture, centered on liberal arts and the "Great Books" tradition, to transmit enduring heritage and develop speculative understanding from early imaginative stages (ages 6-9) to advanced philosophy (ages 23-26).[36][38] Teachers, whom he describes as artists, must facilitate this growth by honoring students' inner vitality rather than imposing external molds.[36] In his seminal work Education at the Crossroads (1943), delivered as lectures during World War II, Maritain warns of education's perilous divergence toward pragmatism, sociologism, and technocracy, which neglect the person's transcendent end and reduce learning to utilitarian ends.[38] He critiques empiricist epistemologies, such as those akin to John Dewey's, for warping educational aims by denying universal truths and metaphysical realism in favor of tentative, experience-based knowledge.[37] Instead, Maritain's integral humanism integrates reason and faith, insisting that education requires a religious foundation to achieve completeness, as humans are rational creatures with a divine telos.[37] This vision aligns with Thomistic anthropology, where charity and speculative intellect guide formation toward eternal happiness.[38] Maritain elaborates these ideas in other works, such as The Education of Man (1962), a collection addressing teaching as an art and educational problems, and Pour une Philosophie de l’Éducation (1959), which outlines a philosophy centered on human capacity.[36] Practically, he promotes lifelong learning, ethical and religious instruction, and leisure for contemplation, rejecting early specialization and consumerism in favor of holistic development that preserves cultural and moral heritage.[36] His theory thus serves as a bulwark against totalitarian or secular ideologies in education, advocating for the person’s full realization in community and cosmos.[38]

Political Philosophy

Integral Humanism as Third Way

Integral Humanism, as articulated by Jacques Maritain in his 1936 work Humanisme intégral (translated as Integral Humanism), represents a political and social philosophy positioned as a "third way" between the individualism of liberal capitalism and the collectivism of socialism. Maritain critiqued capitalism for prioritizing economic self-interest and materialistic reductionism, which subordinate the human person to market forces and neglect spiritual dimensions of existence. Similarly, he rejected socialism, particularly Marxism, for its atheistic materialism and elevation of the state or class over individual dignity, viewing it as a form of partial humanism that denies transcendent ends.[1][39] Drawing on Thomistic principles, Maritain's framework emphasizes personalism, wherein the human person—endowed with inherent dignity as imago Dei—serves as the foundational unit of society, integrating bodily, intellectual, and spiritual aspects rather than isolating temporal concerns. This integral approach advocates for a pluralistic temporal order, featuring subsidiarity, where intermediary bodies such as families, guilds, professional associations, and unions mediate between individuals and the state to foster organic social bonds and prevent totalitarian centralization. The common good, oriented toward human flourishing and ultimate spiritual vocation, guides governance, with the state functioning as a servant of persons rather than an absolute sovereign.[1] In the context of the 1930s crises—including the Great Depression, rise of fascism, and Spanish Civil War—Maritain envisioned a "new Christendom" that secularizes political life while retaining Christian inspiration, promoting democratic participation, natural rights, and freedom of conscience without confessional uniformity. This model influenced postwar Christian democratic movements and contributed intellectually to documents like the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, for which Maritain served as a drafter, by grounding human rights in natural law accessible to reason. Critics, however, have noted tensions in reconciling pluralism with the primacy of spiritual truth, as later traditionalist Catholic thinkers argued it risked diluting confessional commitments in public life.[1]

Democracy, Pluralism, and Human Rights

Maritain conceived of democracy not merely as a procedural mechanism but as an embodiment of the inherent dignity of the human person, rooted in Thomistic natural law and personalism. In Man and the State (1951), he distinguished between the "form" of democracy—majority rule and elections—and its "spirit," which demands a profound respect for individual rights and communal goods derived from objective moral truths accessible through reason.[40] [41] He argued that true democracy requires a society oriented toward the common good, rejecting both totalitarian collectivism and individualistic relativism, while emphasizing subsidiarity to limit state power and empower intermediary bodies like families and voluntary associations.[42] This framework positioned democracy as compatible with Christianity, provided it aligns with eternal principles rather than secular ideologies that undermine human transcendence.[43] On pluralism, Maritain envisioned a civil society where diverse philosophical and religious convictions coexist under a shared foundation of natural rights, without the state imposing a single comprehensive worldview. He maintained that in a pluralistic body politic, legislation could draw from Christian-inspired natural law principles that non-believers might accept through unaided reason, fostering convergence on essentials like human dignity and justice.[44] [45] This approach critiqued absolute secularism, insisting that the state's neutrality extends only to specific religious truths, not to the rational moral order underpinning rights and freedoms.[40] Maritain's pluralism thus preserved the role of religion in public life, arguing that excluding transcendent foundations leads to moral fragmentation and weakens democratic resilience against ideologies like communism or fascism.[46] Maritain's contributions to human rights emphasized their ontological basis in the person's participatory existence in divine reason, rendering them inalienable and prior to positive law. During his tenure as French ambassador to the Holy See from 1945 to 1948, he influenced international discourse on rights, providing philosophical groundwork for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948.[3] [16] He collaborated with figures like Charles Malik and participated in UNESCO's preparatory work, articulating how natural law enables cross-cultural agreement on rights in diverse societies, as diverse thinkers could endorse the UDHR's principles for varying philosophical reasons.[47] [48] This synthesis bridged particular religious insights with universal rationality, countering positivist views that rights derive solely from state concession or majority will.[17]

Critiques of Totalitarianism and Secular Ideologies

Maritain viewed totalitarianism as the pathological culmination of ideologies that absolutize the state while subordinating the human person to collective abstractions, such as race or class, thereby denying the person's transcendent dignity and natural rights. In Man and the State (1951), he described Nazism as "State totalitarianism of Race" and Bolshevism as "State totalitarianism of Class," observing that the epoch had witnessed these systems' revelation of the state's true face when made absolute, unchecked by higher moral or spiritual principles.[49] This critique drew from his Thomistic ontology, which posits the person as a subsistent unity of body and soul oriented toward God, rendering any reduction to materialist or collectivist categories inherently dehumanizing.[50] Maritain first systematically applied the concept of totalitarianism in 1936, amid rising threats from fascist and communist regimes, employing it to denote regimes that integrate all societal aspects under state control, obliterating intermediate bodies like families and churches.[51] In Humanisme Intégral (1936), he traced these pathologies to the modern deviation toward anthropocentric humanism, which severed human flourishing from divine transcendence and fostered delusions of collective omnipotence, as seen in the anti-Semitic barbarism of Nazi Germany and the class warfare of Soviet communism.[52] [53] He rejected both as pagan or atheistic distortions that instrumentalize individuals, contrasting them with a pluralistic order grounded in personalist ethics.[54] Turning to secular ideologies, Maritain lambasted modern pseudo-humanism—epitomized in Enlightenment rationalism and positivism—for its immanentist reduction of humanity to autonomous reason, devoid of supernatural ends, which inevitably erodes objective moral foundations and invites totalitarian substitutions.[55] Such ideologies, he argued, abstract the human from its integral nature, treating dignity as a construct rather than a participation in eternal law, thereby enabling the "shattering" of atheistic pretensions through the evident failures of materialist regimes.[11] While advocating a "secular" temporal order respectful of conscience and pluralism, Maritain insisted this must affirm transcendence and natural law to avoid relativism's slide into state idolatry or ideological uniformity.[30] His alternative, integral humanism, integrates spiritual and temporal realms without sacralizing politics, critiquing secular visions that divinize human constructs over divine reality.[56]

Public Life and Engagements

World War II Involvement and Resistance

Following the fall of France in June 1940, Jacques Maritain, who had arrived in the United States in 1939 on a lecture tour, chose exile in New York City rather than return to occupied territory or align with the Vichy regime, which he publicly denounced for its collaboration with Nazi Germany.[2][57] From this position, he criticized Vichy's authoritarian policies and antisemitic measures, viewing them as antithetical to Christian personalism and integral humanism.[2][57] Despite invitations from Charles de Gaulle to join the Free French in London, Maritain remained in the U.S. to advocate freely for France's moral renewal and to support anti-Nazi efforts without compromising his independence.[2] In 1940, Maritain co-founded the École Libre des Hautes Études in New York, an institution for exiled French intellectuals that served as a intellectual hub opposing Vichy and fostering resistance networks; by late 1942, he had been elected its president.[58] The school aided nearly 200 refugees, including philosophers and artists, through collaborations with the New School for Social Research and rescue organizations like the International Rescue Committee, providing employment, visas, and a platform for anti-fascist scholarship.[58] Maritain's organizational role extended to arranging emergency aid for figures such as Jean Wahl and Marc Chagall, reinforcing a transnational intellectual resistance against totalitarianism.[2][58] Maritain's primary contributions to the resistance were ideological, through writings and broadcasts that inspired European opposition to Nazism. He authored The Rights of Man and Natural Law in 1942 and Christianity and Democracy in 1943, arguing for democratic pluralism grounded in natural law as a bulwark against totalitarian ideologies, works that circulated among resistance groups and influenced postwar human rights frameworks.[47][2] He delivered radio addresses from New York, including a November 1943 broadcast envisioning a renewed democracy, to bolster morale and strategic thinking among occupied populations, particularly in France and Italy.[59][47] These efforts, alongside pieces like his 1943 "Open Letter to Frenchmen" urging rejection of collaborationist "false prophets," positioned Maritain as a key moral voice sustaining the French Resistance's philosophical underpinnings from afar.[60][57]

Postwar Contributions to International Institutions

Following World War II, Jacques Maritain played a significant role in UNESCO, serving as president of the French delegation to its second General Conference in Beirut from November 1948. In this capacity, he advocated for intellectual unity amid ideological divisions, emphasizing the organization's mission to foster peace through education, science, and culture.[61] [62] Maritain also chaired a UNESCO philosophical committee tasked with providing background perspectives on human rights to inform the drafting of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in December 1948. Drawing from Thomistic natural law, he argued that human rights could be grounded in objective moral principles accessible across diverse worldviews, including secular, religious, and cultural traditions, without requiring philosophical agreement on foundations. This approach influenced drafters such as Charles Malik, the Lebanese philosopher who served as rapporteur for the UN Human Rights Commission, through Maritain's writings and correspondence.[63] [64] [3] In 1949, Maritain authored the introduction to UNESCO's publication Human Rights: Comments and Interpretations, a collection of essays by philosophers elucidating the declaration's principles. He stressed the need for a "pluralist unity" in international norms, rooted in the dignity of the person, to counter totalitarian ideologies and promote global cooperation. His postwar efforts thus bridged Catholic personalism with emerging international frameworks, though critics later noted tensions between natural law foundations and the declaration's relativistic interpretations by some signatories.[65] [47]

Relationships with Key Figures and Movements

Maritain maintained close intellectual ties with fellow Thomists, including Etienne Gilson, whose 1923 edition of Le Thomisme initiated their enduring friendship, though they diverged on Henri Bergson's philosophy, with Maritain more critical of Bergsonian intuitionism.[1][66] Similarly, Yves R. Simon, a student and lifelong collaborator, worked alongside Maritain on humanitarian efforts for refugees in France during the 1930s and shared his emphasis on Aristotelian-Thomistic natural law traditions.[2][67] In the realm of personalism, Maritain influenced Emmanuel Mounier, founder of the journal Esprit, whose advocacy for engaged social Catholicism drew directly from Maritain's Thomistic anthropology and calls for communal action, fostering a dialogue that shaped mid-century French Catholic thought.[26] He also corresponded with Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev from 1924 onward, exchanging ideas on spirituality amid totalitarianism, which enriched Maritain's critiques of ideological extremes.[1] Maritain's rapport with papal figures deepened postwar; Pope Paul VI, a profound admirer, consulted him personally during Vatican II (1962–1965) and collaborated on liturgical renewal, as evidenced by their joint promotion of sacred art reforms between 1945 and 1973.[68] Pope John XXIII's social encyclicals echoed Maritain's integral humanism, though direct personal ties were more pronounced under Paul VI.[2] Politically, Maritain befriended American organizer Saul Alinsky, engaging in correspondence that bridged Catholic social teaching with grassroots activism against injustice. His early encounters included studying under Bergson at the Sorbonne before rejecting vitalism, and conversion to Catholicism in 1906 inspired by Léon Bloy's writings, which catalyzed his lifelong Thomistic pivot.[1] Through these ties, Maritain anchored movements like neo-Thomism's twentieth-century revival and Christian personalism, while his wartime exile in the U.S. (1940–1948) informed anti-fascist networks, including appeals for French resistance against Vichy collaborationism.[2][60] His integral humanism, disseminated via collaborations, undergirded Christian democratic ideologies in Europe and Latin America, prioritizing person-centered pluralism over collectivist alternatives.[1][69]

Legacy and Reception

Influence on Catholic Thought and Vatican II

Jacques Maritain's neo-Thomistic philosophy significantly shaped twentieth-century Catholic thought by reviving the synthesis of faith and reason articulated by Thomas Aquinas, adapting it to confront secular modernism and advocate for an integral humanism that affirmed human dignity rooted in the supernatural.[1] His emphasis on personalism and the distinction between the spiritual and temporal orders influenced Catholic social teaching, promoting pluralism and democratic governance as compatible with Christian principles without subordinating the Church to the state.[5] Through works like Integral Humanism (1936), Maritain argued for a theocentric society that respected natural rights derived from divine law, impacting the Church's engagement with modernity.[2] Maritain's ideas on religious liberty and the common good prefigured key themes in Vatican II documents such as Dignitatis Humanae (1965), which affirmed the right to religious freedom, and Gaudium et Spes (1965), which addressed the Church's role in the modern world.[70] As a consultant to Pope Paul VI during the Council (1962–1965), he contributed to its intellectual foundations, particularly in reconciling Thomistic realism with openness to contemporary culture while upholding transcendence.[2] At the Council's conclusion on December 8, 1965, Paul VI personally presented Maritain with the "Message to Men of Thought and of Science," recognizing his longstanding mentorship and philosophical guidance.[1] In the immediate aftermath, Maritain expressed qualified support for the Council's reforms, welcoming advancements in ecumenism and the universal call to holiness but cautioning against neo-modernist interpretations that risked diluting doctrinal integrity.[70] His 1966 critique The Peasant of the Garonne critiqued post-conciliar excesses, such as the denial of metaphysical realities by figures like Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, underscoring the need to defend the Council's authentic spirit against superficial adaptations.[5] This balanced stance reinforced Maritain's enduring role in steering Catholic intellectual discourse toward fidelity to perennial truth amid evolving societal challenges.[70]

Impact on Christian Democracy and Conservatism

Maritain's Integral Humanism (1936) articulated a vision of society that synthesized Thomistic natural law with democratic pluralism, serving as a foundational text for Christian democracy's "third way" between laissez-faire capitalism and Marxism. This framework emphasized the person as oriented toward the common good, subsidiarity in governance, and the temporal realization of evangelical values without clerical dominance, directly inspiring postwar European movements.[8][71] His ideas influenced the philosophical underpinnings of parties like France's Mouvement Républicain Populaire (formed December 1944) and contributed to broader Christian democratic governance models in Italy and Germany, where leaders invoked Maritainian personalism to justify social market economies rooted in Christian anthropology.[2] In Christianity and Democracy (1943), Maritain contended that authentic democracy emerges from the Gospel's elevation of human dignity, requiring a "democratic charter" informed by supernatural grace yet operational in secular politics. This thesis bridged Catholic social teaching with liberal institutions, promoting Christian democracy as a bulwark against totalitarianism while fostering pluralism under natural law.[72] His advocacy resonated in the 1940s reconstruction, where Christian democrats applied his principles to constitutions emphasizing human rights and welfare states, as evidenced by his consultations with figures shaping Europe's postwar order.[73] Maritain's impact on conservatism lay in providing a Thomistic defense of limited government and moral order compatible with democracy, influencing anti-ideological strands that prioritized the common good over statism or individualism. Thinkers in the neoconservative vein drew on his rejection of atheistic humanism and emphasis on virtue-formation through civil society, viewing his work as a Catholic corrective to secular conservatism.[74] However, his endorsement of religious freedom and laïcité distanced him from integralist conservatives, limiting his appeal to those favoring confessional states, though his personalism informed Vatican social doctrine's conservative applications in subsidiarity and family primacy.[42]

Criticisms from Traditionalists and Integralists

Traditionalist Catholics and integralists have faulted Jacques Maritain's political philosophy for its perceived alignment with liberal principles, particularly his endorsement of pluralistic democracy, religious liberty, and universal human rights, which they contend dilute the Thomistic tradition and undermine the Church's rightful supremacy in temporal affairs.[75][30] They argue that Maritain's vision of a "new Christendom" through secular regimes tolerant of religious diversity fails to restore a confessional state where civil authority explicitly recognizes and subordinates itself to the Catholic Church, as advocated in pre-conciliar teachings like those of Pope Leo XIII.[76][42] A core objection centers on Maritain's interpretation of natural rights and religious freedom, which critics maintain lacks foundation in St. Thomas Aquinas, who did not affirm an unqualified liberty of conscience or religion for error.[75] For instance, Thomistic commentators have rejected Maritain's linkage of Christianity specifically to democracy, noting that Aquinas pragmatically accommodated various regimes without privileging democratic forms, and that historical Church practice prioritized the common good over individual rights extended to non-innocents, such as in cases of just war or capital punishment.[75] Integralists further critique his role in shaping the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, viewing the document's reliance on inter-ideological consensus—such as between communists and capitalists—as a pragmatic evasion of objective natural law rooted in divine reason, potentially enabling secular ideologies to co-opt Christian principles without acknowledging their transcendent source.[76][30] Neo-integralists, including figures like John Milbank, have extended these charges by attributing the erosion of Christian civilization in the West—evident in phenomena like widespread church disaffiliation and the sexual revolution—to Maritain's acceptance of pluralism and church-state separation, which they see as a concession to modernism that invites negative secularism rather than fostering integral subordination of the temporal to the spiritual.[30][42] Earlier debates, such as that between Maritain's personalism and Charles De Koninck's emphasis on the common good, highlighted tensions where traditionalists accused Maritain of overemphasizing individual dignity at the expense of communal and hierarchical order aligned with Catholic doctrine.[77] These critiques portray Maritain's "integral humanism" as an eclectic adaptation of Thomism that, while rejecting outright totalitarianism, accommodates liberal errors incompatible with a robust defense of the faith in public life.[75]

Contemporary Reassessments

In the early 21st century, scholars have revisited Jacques Maritain's political philosophy to address challenges to liberal democracy, emphasizing his conception of the state as grounded in natural law and personal dignity rather than ideological absolutism.[46] The 2006 volume Reassessing the Liberal State, published by the American Maritain Association, analyzes his 1949 Walgreen Lectures in Man and the State, arguing that Maritain's framework integrates enduring elements of ancient and medieval traditions to critique unchecked individualism while preserving pluralism.[78] This reassessment posits that his distinction between the state's indirect power over the spiritual order allows for moral limits on governance without reverting to theocratic models, offering tools for navigating secularist excesses in contemporary politics.[79] Maritain's personalism has gained renewed attention for its application to global issues, including economic disparities and intercultural dialogue. In Jacques Maritain in the 21st Century: Personalism and the Political Organization of the World (2023), Walter Schultz contends that Maritain's vision of the person as oriented toward communal flourishing informs movements addressing inequality, while highlighting his recognition of Israel's role in a pluralistic "political organization of the world."[80] This interpretation extends to Jewish-Christian relations, where Maritain's integral humanism is seen as fostering liberation from modern individualism, rooted in Renaissance and Reformation shifts toward subjectivism.[81] Similarly, a 2024 analysis in Religions reaffirms his metaphysics as essential for engaging secular culture, countering relativism through Thomistic realism that prioritizes objective truth over subjective constructs.[82] Defenses of Maritain against postmodern and neo-integralist critiques underscore his enduring realism in an era of metaphysical skepticism. A 2025 Civitas Institute review praises his postwar ethical contributions, particularly the realist epistemology that affirms knowledge of the real world against Cartesian doubt, positioning Thomism as transcending left-right divides.[69] Echoing this, a 2022 Public Discourse essay applies his principles to advocate laws reflecting Christian morality while protecting minority freedoms, rejecting strict secularism as incompatible with human flourishing.[45] These evaluations collectively affirm Maritain's relevance for sustaining democratic virtues amid cultural fragmentation, though they caution against over-idealizing his optimism about pluralist consensus without robust metaphysical anchors.[83]

Major Writings

Foundational Philosophical Works

Maritain's foundational philosophical works established his role as a leading twentieth-century Thomist, systematically reviving and adapting the metaphysics, epistemology, and aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas to counter modern philosophies such as Bergsonism and Kantianism. These texts emphasize the primacy of being (esse) over essence, the analogical nature of knowledge, and the integration of faith and reason, drawing directly from Aquinas's Summa Theologica while addressing contemporary intellectual challenges.[1] His earliest significant book, La Philosophie Bergsonienne (published in 1913 and later translated as Bergsonian Philosophy and Thomism), critiques Henri Bergson's intuitionist vitalism by contrasting it with Thomistic realism, arguing that Bergson's rejection of intellect's grasp of universal essences undermines metaphysical truth and leads to subjectivism. Maritain posits that true philosophy must begin with sensory experience abstracted by the intellect to intelligible forms, as Aquinas taught, rather than privileging duration and élan vital. This work, written shortly after his 1906 conversion to Catholicism and studies under Thomists like Léon Bloy, signals Maritain's shift from initial agnosticism to a robust defense of scholasticism.[84] In Art et Scolastique (Art and Scholasticism, 1920), Maritain develops a Thomistic theory of aesthetics, defining art as a "right way of making" rooted in the speculative intellect's rectitude, distinct from prudence (which orders human acts) yet akin to it in habituating the maker toward perfection. He contends that beauty inheres objectively in the proportion of form to matter, perceived connaturally through the senses, and that the artist's intuition analogously participates in divine creation without reducing art to mere imitation of nature. This treatise counters romantic subjectivism by insisting art serves truth, influencing later Catholic aesthetics and figures like Jacques Barzun.[1] The Degrees of Knowledge (Distinguons pour unir, ou Les Degrés du savoir, 1932) forms the epistemological core of Maritain's system, hierarchically distinguishing modes of knowing—from empirical science (operating on "signs of signs"), to metaphysics (intuiting subsistent being), to mystical experience (connatural union with God)—while unifying them under the primacy of intellectual intuition and obedience to being. Building on Aquinas's distinctions between scientia, intellectus, and sapientia, Maritain critiques modern empiricism and rationalism for flattening this scale, arguing that supra-rational knowledge presupposes and perfects rational inquiry, thus safeguarding theology's autonomy. Revised editions incorporated responses to critics, affirming the work's enduring role in neo-Thomistic epistemology.[20] These works collectively underscore Maritain's "integral Thomism," which rejects both rigid manualism and modernist dilutions, prioritizing causal realism in ontology—where act (esse) explains potency—and empirical fidelity in starting from observed reality, as evidenced by his insistence on analogical predication to avoid univocity or equivocity in metaphysical discourse.[1]

Political and Social Texts

In Humanisme intégral (1936), published amid rising totalitarianism in Europe, Maritain critiqued the anthropocentric humanism of the Renaissance onward, which he argued severed human dignity from its transcendent roots in natural law and divine order, leading to ideologies like fascism and communism that subordinate the person to the state or class.[11] Instead, he proposed "integral humanism" as a temporal realization of Christian principles, envisioning a pluralistic society where the human person—body and soul—is central, economic structures serve communal goods without collectivism, and secular culture draws implicit inspiration from evangelical values without clerical dominance.[1] This framework rejected both liberal individualism's atomism and Marxist materialism, advocating vocational groups and subsidiarity to foster organic social bodies.[85] Maritain expanded these ideas in Christianity and Democracy (1943), written during World War II exile in New York, asserting that true democracy derives its vitality from Christian notions of human equality before God and the inalienable dignity of the person, rather than from secular rationalism alone.[86] He contended that Christianity cannot be subordinated to any political regime but provides the moral foundation for democratic freedoms, warning against atheistic democracies that risk devolving into tyranny by lacking a transcendent reference for rights.[72] Democracy, in his view, embodies a "secular conscience" enriched by Gospel inspiration, promoting temporal progress while acknowledging spiritual primacy.[87] In The Rights of Man and Natural Law (1942), Maritain defended universal human rights as rooted in objective natural law discernible by reason, not mere positive law or subjective will, distinguishing them from the French Revolution's abstract declarations that ignored original sin's implications for governance.[72] He argued these rights—life, liberty, and participation in the common good—stem from the person's eternal destiny, requiring a society structured to protect them against totalitarian encroachments.[1] Maritain's Man and the State (1951), delivered as the Walgreen Lectures at the University of Chicago, delineated the distinctions among nation (cultural-ethnic bond), body politic (voluntary association for common good), and state (instrumental authority derived from the people).[85] Sovereignty resides in the body politic, not the state apparatus, which serves persons rather than commanding them absolutely; he critiqued absolutist theories from Hobbes to Hegel for inverting this order, leading to Leviathan-like entities.[49] Democracy thrives through pluralistic participation and constitutional limits, with the Church offering moral guidance independent of state power.[50] These texts collectively influenced postwar Catholic social teaching, emphasizing personalism over statism.[1]

Other Significant Publications

Maritain extended his intellectual contributions to aesthetics, emphasizing the role of intuitive knowledge in artistic creation. In Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry (1953), originally delivered as A.W. Mellon Lectures at the National Gallery of Art, he distinguished between speculative and practical intuition, arguing that the artist's creative act participates in divine creativity through a supra-rational apprehension of essences, thereby bridging Thomistic metaphysics with modern artistic practice.[88][89] This work complemented his earlier aesthetic theories while applying them to poetry and painting as modes of connatural knowledge. On education, Education at the Crossroads (1943), based on wartime lectures at Yale and St. John's Universities, critiqued utilitarian and progressive educational models for neglecting the integral formation of the person, proposing instead a synthesis of liberal arts, technical training, and spiritual development rooted in natural law and Christian humanism.[88] He warned against state-dominated systems that undermine personal responsibility, advocating curricula that foster intellectual virtues and moral conscience. Similarly, Reflections on America (1951) offered observations on U.S. society, praising its democratic pluralism and religious vitality as exemplars of temporal pluralism under divine transcendence, while cautioning against materialism and secularist excesses.[88][90] In liturgical and contemplative writings, Liturgy and Contemplation (1960) explored the Mass as a participatory mystery uniting the faithful in Christ's redemptive act, distinguishing it from purely mystical contemplation while affirming its role in fostering infused virtues and communal sanctification.[88] Maritain stressed the liturgy's objective sacredness against subjective interpretations, drawing on Thomistic distinctions between active and passive participation. His final major work, The Peasant of the Garonne (1966), a candid autobiographical reflection written amid post-Vatican II upheavals, critiqued neo-modernist trends, "leftist" theology, and hasty liturgical reforms as deviations from perennial doctrine, urging fidelity to the Church's unchanging essence despite necessary adaptations.[88][91] This text, evoking Pascal's Pensées, provoked controversy for its rejection of "progressivist" ideologies within Catholicism, reaffirming Maritain's commitment to integral Thomism over dialectical compromises.

References

  1. Jacques Maritain - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  2. About Jacques Maritain
  3. Christian Contributions to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
  4. Jacques Maritain (1882-1973) - BU Personal Websites
  5. Library : Jacques Maritain's Service to Truth - Catholic Culture
  6. Léon Bloy's Role in the Catholicism of Jacques and Raissa Maritain
  7. Friendship With God After a Time of Tragedy | Church Life Journal
  8. The Red Christian - New Statesman
  9. [PDF] Jacques Maritain and His Contribution to the Philosophy of Catholic ...
  10. Jacques Maritain - Histories of The New School
  11. Maritain's True Humanism - First Things
  12. The Great Friendship - World Mission Magazine
  13. World War II - Maison Française - Columbia University
  14. Maritain, Jacques - Princeton - A Princeton Companion - chaptertitle
  15. When Catholicism Embraced Modernity - Boston Review
  16. Human rights and natural law | The UNESCO Courier
  17. Jacques Maritain on Human Rights | ubcgcu
  18. Jacques Maritain (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2019 ...
  19. Jacques Maritain Dies at 90 - The New York Times
  20. Degrees of Knowledge - University of Notre Dame Press
  21. [PDF] Jacques Maritain's Degrees of Knowledge
  22. [PDF] connatural knowing maritain - International Étienne Gilson Society
  23. Jacques Maritain's Personalism - jstor
  24. [PDF] Jacques Maritain's Social Critique and His Personalism - MacSphere
  25. Personalism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  26. Jacques Maritain - Personalism.com
  27. Maritain on “the Common Good” : Reflections on the Concept - Érudit
  28. [PDF] The political theory of personalism: Maritain and Mounier ... - SciSpace
  29. https://www.pdcnet.org/scholarpdf/show?id=ncbq_2017_0017_0004_0615_0621&pdfname=ncbq_2017_0017_0004_0615_0621.pdf
  30. In Defense of Jacques Maritain Against His Neo-Integralist Critics
  31. The Return of Thomistic Political Philosophy, Part II - thomistica
  32. Jacques Maritain's personalist conception of human dignity
  33. [PDF] Art and Scholasticism - Jacques Maritain Center
  34. Library : Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry | Catholic Culture
  35. Library : Chapter Four - Creative Intuition and Poetic Knowledge
  36. [PDF] Jacques Maritain and His Philosophy of Education - Caritas et veritas
  37. [PDF] Jacques Maritain and John Dewey on Education:A Reconsideration
  38. [PDF] Jacques Maritain and an Education for Human Capacity
  39. Integral Humanism - Ram Madhav
  40. [PDF] Jacques Maritain's Defense of a Christian and Liberal Democracy
  41. Jacques Maritain and Reinhold Niebuhr: Theorists of Democratic ...
  42. Where Have You Gone, Jacques Maritain? - Public Discourse
  43. [PDF] Virtue and the Politics of Pluralism in the Thought of Jacques Maritain
  44. Jacques Maritain and the Problem of Pluralism in Political Life - jstor
  45. Maritain for Our Time - Public Discourse
  46. Reassessing the Liberal State - American Maritain Association
  47. How a Catholic thinker made human rights universal - Angelus News
  48. Jacques Maritain and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights | 12 |
  49. Jacques Maritain, Man and the State (1951) - Panarchy.org
  50. Maritain in Context: A Selection from <i>Man and the State</i>
  51. THE CATHOLIC ORIGINS OF TOTALITARIANISM THEORY IN ...
  52. An Interview with Jacques Maritain | Commonweal Magazine
  53. The Presence Of Jacques Maritain - The Postil Magazine
  54. https://www.nytimes.com/1943/06/06/archives/the-drift-of-the-human-mind-twilight-of-civilization-by-jacques.html
  55. Jacques Maritain Against Modern Pseudo-Humanism - Academia.edu
  56. Maritain and a Christian Response to Political Humanism - Zenit.org
  57. How Jacques Maritain went from antisemite to Catholic champion of ...
  58. "Responding to the Global Crisis: Jacques Maritain and World War II ...
  59. [PDF] Responding to the Global Crisis: Jacques Maritain, World War II, and ...
  60. An Open Letter to Frenchmen - The Atlantic
  61. UNESCO in France, France in UNESCO, and the Role of Libraries ...
  62. M. Maritain calls for unity - UNESCO Digital Library
  63. [PDF] THE FOUNDATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS: CATHOLIC ...
  64. [PDF] Jacques Maritain and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
  65. [PDF] Human rights: comments and interpretations
  66. [PDF] The Dispute between Gilson and Maritain over Thomist Realism
  67. Presentation of Yves Simon's The Tradition of Natural Law
  68. Pope Paul VI and Jacques Maritain: The Renewal of Sacred Art ...
  69. The Philosophy of Jacques Maritain — A Long-Awaited Introduction
  70. Jacques Maritain and Vatican Council II - First Things
  71. Integral Humanism, Freedom in the Modern World, and A Letter on ...
  72. Christianity and Democracy: The Rights of Man and The Natural Law
  73. Jacques Maritain, Christian Democracy and the Growth of Human ...
  74. The Achievement of Jacques Maritain - First Things
  75. Some Critical Comments on Maritain's Political Philosophy - thomistica
  76. The problems with Jacques Maritain's political philosophy
  77. Charles De Koninck vs. Jacques Maritain: Philosophers and Their ...
  78. Reassessing the Liberal State: Reading Maritain's Man and the ...
  79. [PDF] Jacques Maritain and Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
  80. [PDF] Jacques Maritain in the 21st Century - Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  81. Reading Jacques Maritain in the Twenty-First Century: Personalism ...
  82. Christianity, Culture, and the Real: From Maritain's Integral ... - MDPI
  83. Nature, Grace, and Metaphysical Experience, or “Why the World ...
  84. Bergsonian Philosophy and Thomism
  85. Man and the State - CUAPress
  86. Christianity and Democracy - Ignatius Press
  87. Christianity and democracy : Maritain, Jacques, 1882-1973
  88. Collected Works | About Jacques Maritain
  89. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691251837/creative-intuition-in-art-and-poetry
  90. Online Books by Jacques Maritain
  91. by Jacques Maritain - Kirkus Reviews
  92. God and the origin of moral evil: a defence of Jacques Maritain
User Avatar
No comments yet.