Hubbry Logo
GelugGelugMain
Open search
Gelug
Community hub
Gelug
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gelug
Gelug
from Wikipedia
An illustration of Je Tsongkhapa, the founder, and his two principal students (Kédrup and Gyeltsap) on his left and right with other lineage teachers and protectors of the Gelug tradition
The 14th Dalai Lama (center), the most influential figure of the contemporary Gelug tradition, at the 2003 Kalachakra ceremony, Bodhgaya (India)

The Gelug (/ɡəˈlɡ/, also Geluk; lit. 'virtuous')[1] is the youngest of the four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism.[2] It was founded by Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), a Tibetan philosopher, tantric yogi and lama and further expanded and developed by his disciples (such as Khedrup Je, Gyaltsap Je, Dulzin Drakpa Gyaltsen, and Gendün Drubpa).[1]

The Gelug school is alternatively known as Kadam (bKa’-gdams gsar-pa), since it sees itself as a continuation of the Kadam tradition of Atisha (c. 11th century). The school of New Kadam, or New Kadampa is an offshoot of the Gelug-tradition.[3] Furthermore, it is also called the Ganden school, after the first monastery established by Tsongkhapa.[1] The Ganden Tripa ("Ganden Throne Holder") is the official head of the school, though its most influential political figure is the Dalai Lama ("Ocean Teacher"). Allying themselves with the Mongol Khans, the Gelug school emerged as the dominant Buddhist school in Tibet and Mongolia since the end of the 16th century (religiously and politically). Another alternative name for this tradition is the Yellow Hat school or sect.[4]

Doctrinally, the Gelug school promotes a unique form of prasangika Madhyamaka based on the works of Tsongkhapa. According to John Powers, Tsongkhapa's work "contains a comprehensive view of Buddhist philosophy and practice that integrates sutra and tantra, analytical reasoning, and yogic meditation."[5]

Etymology

[edit]
Gelug
Tibetan name
Tibetan དགེ་ལུགས་པ་
Transcriptions
Wyliedge lugs pa
Tibetan PinyinGêlug
Lhasa IPA[ˈɡèluʔ]
Chinese name
Traditional Chinese格魯派 / 黃教
Simplified Chinese格鲁派 / 黄教
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinGélǔ Pài / Huáng Jiào

"Ganden" is the Tibetan rendition of the Sanskrit name "Tushita", the Pure land associated with Maitreya Buddha. At first, Tsongkhapa's school was called "Ganden Choluk" meaning "the Spiritual Lineage of Ganden". By taking the first syllable of 'Ganden' and the second of 'Choluk', this was abbreviated to "Galuk" and then modified to the more easily pronounced "Gelug".[6]

The Gelug school was also called the "New Kadam", because it saw itself a revival of the Kadam school founded by Atisha.[7]

History

[edit]

Tsongkhapa

[edit]

The Gelug school was founded by Je Tsongkhapa, an eclectic Buddhist monk and yogi who traveled Tibet studying under Kadam, Sakya, Drikung Kagyu, Jonang and Nyingma teachers. These include the Sakya scholar Rendawa (1349–1412), the Drikung Thil scholar Chenga Chokyi Gyalpo, the Kadam mystic Lama Umapa, the Jonang master Bodong Chokley Namgyal and the Dzogchen master Drupchen Lekyi Dorje.[8][9][10][11]

A great admirer of the Kadam school, Tsongkhapa merged the Kadam teachings of lojong (mind training) and lamrim (stages of the path) with the Vajrayana teachings of the Sakya, Kaygu and Jonang schools.[12] He also emphasized monasticism and a strict adherence to vinaya (monastic discipline). He combined this with extensive and unique writings on madhyamaka, Buddhist epistemology, and Buddhist practice. Tsongkhapa's numerous works on philosophy and tantric practice were widely influential and they marked a turning point in the history of Tibetan Buddhist philosophy.[13][14]

Tsongkhapa and his disciples founded Ganden monastery in 1409, which was followed by the founding of Drepung (1416) and Sera (in 1419), which became the "great three" Gelug monasteries (and eventually they would become some of the largest monasteries in the world).[15] According to Sam van Schaik these Gelug centers "came to form a triumvirate of massive Gelug monasteries that would dominate the religious and political life of Central Tibet for centuries."[16]

Early growth

[edit]
Khedrup Gelek Pelzang, 1st Panchen Lama (1385–1438 CE), the main leader of the Gelug school after Tsongkhapa's death
Gendun Drup, founder of Tashilhunpo Monastery, and the First Dalai Lama

After the death of Tsongkhapa in 1419 (who at the time was already famous and had attracted numerous disciples) the Gelug (a.k.a. Ganden) order grew extremely quickly through the efforts of Tsongkhapa's disciples who founded numerous new monasteries and spread the doctrine throughout Tibet.[17] The Gelug school developed a reputation for strict adherence to monastic discipline (vinaya) and rigorous scholarship as well as for tantric practice.[18] According to Sam van Schaik, while Tsongkhapa himself did not work to establish a brand new school per se, it was Tsongkhapa's disciples who took up the project of formally constructing a new school of Buddhism. Furthermore, van Schaik writes that "much of the credit for defining and defending the new school must go to Tsongkhapa’s student Khedrup."[19]

Tsongkhapa's three principal disciples were Khedrup Gelek Palsang, Gyaltsap Darma Rinchen and Dülzin Drakpa Gyaltsen.[20] Other important students of Tsongkhapa were Tokden Jampel Gyatso; Jamyang Chöjé and Jamchen Chöjé (the founders of Drepung and Sera monasteries, respectively); and Gendün Drup the First Dalai Lama."[20] Several major monastic centers were founded in Tsang, including Tashi Lhünpo, Segyü, Gyümé and Gyütö college.[21] By the end of the fifteenth century, the collected works of Tsongkhapa had been set on woodblock prints. His works would later be collected together with the works of Gyaltsap and Khedrup (who wrote numerous commentaries on Indian classics and on the works of Tsongkhapa) to become the main unique canonical collection of the Gelug school which is known as the “Father and Sons Collected Works” (jé yapsé ungbum).[17]

According to Thupten Jinpa, by the end of the fifteenth century, the "new Ganden tradition had spread through the entire Tibetan cultural area, with monasteries upholding the tradition located in western Tibet, in Tsang, in central and southern Tibet, and in Kham and Amdo in the east."[17] John Powers also notes that during the following centuries the Gelug school "continued to produce an impressive number of eminent scholars and tantric adepts."[22]

By the end of the fifteenth century, Tsongkhapa had come to be seen as a second Buddha among in the Gelug tradition, and various hagiographies were written by his disciples (like Khedrup Je and Tokden Jampel Gyatso). These texts developed the great myths of the Buddha Tsongkhapa (including stories of his previous births and his various mystical visions) and helped established the new identity of the Gelug school as an authentic lineage (traced back to Manjushri).[17][23] Meanwhile, among the other Tibetan schools, Tsongkhapa now came to be considered "a force to be reckoned with, someone whose vision, ideas, and writings had to be understood in relation to their own cherished lineage and tradition."[17]

This initial period of growth also saw scholastic debates and exchanges between the new Gelug tradition and the earlier sects like the Sakya school, who wrote critiques of Tsongkhapa's philosophy, such as Rongton Shakya Gyaltsen (1367–1449) (and his work led to a response by Khedrup Je).[24] This debate over Tsongkhapa's madhyamaka interpretation was then taken up by a trio of Sakya school thinkers: Taktsang Lotsawa, Gorampa, and Shākya Chokden.[17][25] Their critique would be countered by the works of numerous Gelug scholars, such as Lekpa Chöjor (a.k.a. Jamyang Galo, 1429–1503), the first Panchen Lama Lozang Chökyi Gyaltsen (1507–1662), Jetsun Chökyi Gyaltsen (1469–1544/46), Sera Jetsun Chökyi Gyaltsen, Panchen Delek Nyima and Jamyang Zhepa (1648–1751).[17][26]

The Dalai Lamas and spread to Mongolia

[edit]
The third Dalai Lama, Sönam Gyatso

In 1577 Sönam Gyatso, who was considered to be the third incarnation of Gendün Drup,[27] formed an alliance with the then most powerful Mongol leader, Altan Khan.[27] As a result, Sönam Gyatso was designated as the 3rd Dalai Lama. "Dalai" is a translation into Mongolian of the Tibetan name "Gyatso" (ocean).[27] Gendün Drup and Gendun Gyatso were posthumously recognized as the 1st and 2nd Dalai Lamas respectively.[28]

Sönam Gyatso was very active in proselytizing among the Mongols,[28] and the Gelug tradition was to become the main religion of the Mongols in the ensuing centuries.[28] Sönam Gyatso traveled to Mongolia, and supported the establishment of monasteries and the translation of Buddhist texts to Mongolian.[29] He also worked against certain shamanistic practices such as animal sacrifice and blood sacrifices.[30]

This turn of events provided the Gelug school with powerful patrons who were to propel them to political pre-eminence in Tibet.[28] The Gelug-Mongol alliance was further strengthened as after Sonam Gyatso's death, his incarnation was found to be Altan Khan's great-grandson, who became the 4th Dalai Lama.[28] The influence of the Gelug school on Mongolian Buddhism remains strong today. According to Thupten Jinpa "an important legacy of this relationship has been the tradition of young Mongols studying at the great Geluk centers of learning in Amdo and central Tibet."[21]

The rule of the Great Fifth

[edit]
Qing dynasty painting of the 5th Dalai Lama meeting the Shunzhi Emperor in Beijing, 1653
Potala Palace

Following violent strife among the sects of Tibetan Buddhism, the Gelug school emerged as the dominant one, with the military help of the Mongol Güshri Khan who invaded Tibet in 1642 in order to defeat the king of Tsang. According to Tibetan historian Samten Karmay, Sonam Chophel[31] (1595–1657), treasurer of the Ganden Palace, was the prime architect of the Gelug's rise to political power. Later he received the title Desi [Wylie: sde-sris], meaning "Regent", which he would earn through his efforts to establish Gelugpa power.[32]

The 5th Dalai Lama, Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso (1617–1682), was the first in his line to hold full political and spiritual power in Tibet. He established a formal theocratic system of government, opened diplomatic relations with Qing dynasty China, built the Potala Palace in Lhasa, institutionalized the Tibetan state Nechung Oracle, and spurred a major renaissance in art and book printing.[21] From the period of the 5th Dalai Lama in the 17th century, the Dalai Lamas held political control over central Tibet.[33] The core leadership of this government was also referred to as the Ganden Phodrang. According to Thupten Jinpa, the 5th Dalai Lama's rule "would bring Tibet into a semblance of political unity for the first time since the collapse of the Tibetan empire some seven hundred years earlier."[21]

The Fifth Dalai Lama was a prolific author and scholar.[34] According to Jinpa "the Fifth Dalai Lama was personally an ecumenist who revered Tibet’s other major Buddhist traditions, especially the Nyingma."[21] In this he was influenced by his teacher Paljor Lhundrup who was a Gelug monk and master of the Nyingma Great Perfection (Dzogchen) tradition.[35] The "Great Fifth" wrote numerous works and revealed a cycle of Dzogchen teachings. One of his students (and political successor as regent), Desi Sangye Gyatso was also known as a great scholar who wrote various works on topics like Tibetan medicine, astrology, biography and calligraphy.[36] He is the author of the important Tibetan medical text, The Mirror of Beryl, commissioned a set of medical paintings and wrote a biography of the Fifth Dalai Lama.[37][36]

During the rule of the Fifth Dalai Lama that his teacher Lobsang Chökyi Gyaltsen received the title "Panchen Bogd" from Altan Khan and the Dalai Lama in 1645.[38] This is the beginning of the Panchen Lama tulku line, who traditionally rules Shigatse and the Tsang region from his base at Tashilhunpo Monastery.[39] The institutions of the Dalai Lama and Panchen Lama each participate in the process of recognizing each other's reincarnations.[40] Lobsang Chökyi Gyaltsen was a prolific scholar and a great yogi who is particularly known for his writings on Gelug Mahamudra (mainly his root text Highway of the Conquerors and its auto-commentary Lamp re-illuminating Mahamudra).[41]

Zanabanzar, self-portrait, late 17th or early 18th century, Museum of Fine Arts, Ulan Bator

The Fifth Dalai Lama is also known for having recognized Zanabazar (1635–1723) as the first official Jebtsundamba Khutuktu, the spiritual leader (Bogd Gegeen) of the Mongolian Gelug tradition. Zanabazar was a great Mongolian polymath who excelled in painting, sculpture, poetry, scholarship and languages. He is credited with having launched a renaissance of Mongolian culture in the seventeenth century, with having created the Soyombo script and with widely promoting Buddhism among the Mongols.[42] Zanabazar also oversaw the construction of numerous major Gelug monasteries in Mongolia, such as Shankh Monastery, Tövkhön Monastery and Erdene Zuu Monastery.

The rule of the 5th Dalai Lama also oversaw the repression of the schools of Tibetan Buddhism who were political enemies of the Gelug school and had supported the Tsang dynasty. After the war, many Kagyu and Jonang monasteries were forcefully converted to Gelug monasteries.[43] The writings of the Jonang school as well any literature from the Sakya masters who had attacked Tsongkhapa were also banned and their woodblock prints were locked away.[43] The Dalai Lama's attitude towards Nyingma was different, and he supported the collection and preservation of Nyingma texts, as well as personally patronizing the Mindroling monastery and their leaders Terdag Lingpa and Lochen Dharmashri.[44]

17 and 18th centuries

[edit]

The Sixth Dalai Lama (1683–1706) was an unconventional figure who liked to live as a layperson, refused monastic vows, drank alcohol, slept with women and wrote love poems and erotic poems.[45] His verses are an important part of Tibetan poetry.[46] His successor, the 7th Dalai Lama, was also a noted poet, but he wrote mainly on Buddhist and spiritual themes. The 7th Dalai Lama Kelzang Gyatso was a highly learned Buddhist scholar and wrote hundreds of titles on various Buddhist topics.[47][48] During the time of the 7th, Tibet also became a protectorate of the Qing Empire under the Kangxi Emperor (r. 1661–1722).[49]

The 8th, 9th, 10th. 11th and 12th Dalai Lamas all died young and were not significant figures. Tibet was ruled by a series of regents during this period and experienced much political instability.[50]

During the 17th and 18th centuries, Gelug figures continued to produce new scholastic works. The development of the "tenets" (Tib. grub mtha', Skt. siddhanta) genre (a form of doxography) became a particularly important element of Gelug education and scholarship.[18][51] Perhaps the most influential Gelug doxographer was the great scholar Jamyang Shéba (1648– 1721), who wrote Roar of the Five-Faced [Lion], a series of verses on tenets, and a huge commentary to this root text (around 530 folios), called Great Exposition on Tenets. According to Daniel Cozort, Jamyang's works "are the most comprehensive of the tenets texts" (in Tibetan Buddhism).[52] His reincarnation, Gönchok Jikmé Ongpo (1728–1791), is also known for his shorter tenets text called Precious Garland of Tenets as well as other works on the bodhisattva path.[18]

Other key Gelug scholars of this period include Changkya Rölpé Dorjé (1717–1786), who wrote Presentation of Tenets, and Ngawang Belden (b. 1797), who wrote a major commentary on Jamyang’s Great Exposition.[18]

Changkya Rölpé Dorjé is also known for his knowledge of languages and translation work and for being the main teacher in the Qing court of the Qianlong Emperor. Changkya oversaw the translation of the Tibetan Buddhist canon into Mongolian and Manchu, compiled a collection of the canon in four languages (Chinese, Manchurian, Mongolian and Tibetan) and also supervised the translation of the Śūraṅgama Sūtra into Tibetan.[53]

During the 18th century, Thuken Losang Chökyi Nyima (1737–1802), a student of Changkya, took the tenets genre one step further with his Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems. According to Roger R. Jackson, this text is "arguably the widest-ranging account of religious philosophies ever written in pre-modern Tibet." This work of comparative philosophy and comparative religion discusses all schools of Tibetan Buddhism, Chinese Buddhism and Chinese religions as well as Indian, Mongolian and Khotanese religious systems.[54]

The 19th century

[edit]
Shabkar Tsokdruk Rangdrol

The 19th century saw the great figure of Shabkar Tsokdruk Rangdrol (1781–1851) who was an influential Gelug monk, poet and Dzogchen yogi who is particularly known for his non-sectarian study of various Tibetan Buddhist traditions, especially the Gelug and Nyingma traditions. His writings on non-sectarianism prefigure the rise of the Rime movement by about three decades.[55] His autobiography and other works integrate the teachings of the Gelug tradition with that of the Nyingma school.[56] Another Gelug master who was associated with non-sectarian activity was Minyak Kunzang Sonam (1823–1905). He was a Dzogchen practitioner and one of the four great Dharma heirs of the Nyingma master Patrul Rinpoche.[57][58]

During the era of the 13th Dalai Lama (1876–1933) Tibet reclaimed its independence from China and went through some reforms and modernization activities. The 13th focused on centralizing and modernizing the Tibetan state through developing a modern tax system, military, police and administration. These changes brought about some conflict from the elite Gelug institutions who were used to running their own finances, the most shocking of which was when the 9th Panchen Lama fled for China after losing a power struggle with the Dalai lama.[59] The 13th Dalai Lama also launched a new modern printing of the Tibetan Buddhist canon.[60]

The 20th century saw several influential figures emerge from Gelug institutions, including Gendün Chöphel (1903–1951) and Pabongkha Déchen Nyingpo (1878–1941). During the reign of the 13th Dalai Lama, the so-called "Dorje Shugden controversy" began, spearheaded by the sectarian tendencies of Pabongkha. This division within the Gelug order was based on the worship of a protector deity named Dorje Shugden who was said to punish Gelugs who entered into practices from other Buddhist schools.[61] 13th Dalai Lama (who himself practiced Nyingma Dzogchen and the deity Vajrakilaya) opposed this sectarianism.[62][63]

PRC era, diaspora and the West

[edit]
Rajesh Kasturirangan with the 14th Dalai Lama, Thupten Jinpa and Richard Davidson at Mind and Life Institute XXVI conference, 2013. The Mind and Life institute has been a series of dialogues on Buddhism and science, and these have influenced the field of contemplative science.

After the Annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China and thousands of Tibetan monasteries were destroyed or damaged (mainly during the 1959 Tibetan uprising and the Cultural Revolution of 1966–1976), and many Gelug monks, including the 14th Dalai Lama fled the country to India as part of the Tibetan diaspora. The three major Gelug monastic colleges (Sera, Drepung and Ganden) were recreated in India. The Dalai Lama's current seat is Namgyal Monastery at Dharamshala, this monastery also maintains a branch monastery in Ithaca, New York.[64]

The 14th Dalai Lama is a central leader of the modern Tibetan diaspora and continues to advocate for Tibetan autonomy and human rights as well as continuing to teach Tibetan Buddhism throughout the world. The Dalai Lama has met with numerous political and religious leaders, as well as scientists and philosophers and promotes nonviolence, interfaith dialogue, and the dialogue between Buddhism and science.[65][66][67] The Dalai Lama has become one of the world's most admired religious figures.[68][69]

Numerous other Gelug teachers now teach in the West and Gelug centers have become a regular part of Western Buddhism. Perhaps the largest religious organization associated with the Gelug tradition is the Foundation for the Preservation of the Mahayana Tradition, founded in 1975 by Thubten Yeshe and Thubten Zopa Rinpoche. The organization runs numerous meditation centers, several monasteries such as Nalanda monastery in France and as well Maitripa College. Other influential Gelug lamas who have taught western Buddhists include Ngawang Wangyal, Lhundub Sopa (who founded Deer Park Buddhist Center and Monastery), Geshe Rabten, Choden Rinpoche, Kyabje Yongzin Ling Rinpoche, Geshe Lhakdor, and Dhardo Rinpoche. Some Gelug lamas also went on to receive a modern western university education and became published academics, such as Gelek Rinpoche, Geshe Thupten Jinpa, Geshe Gyeltsen, and Sonam Thakchoe.

Some western students of diaspora Gelug lamas (some of which spent time as monastics) have also become scholars of Buddhism as well as translators and teachers, including Alexander Berzin, B. Alan Wallace, Robert Thurman, Robina Courtin, Jeffrey Hopkins, Donald S. Lopez Jr., José Cabezón, Guy Martin Newland, Nicholas Vreeland, Barry Kerzin, Glenn H. Mullin, and Gareth Sparham.

An American Gelug bhiksuni, Thubten Chodron, is the founder and abbess of Sravasti Abbey, the only Tibetan Buddhist training monastery for Western bhiksunis (fully ordained female monastics) and bhikkus (fully ordained male monastics) in the United States.[70]

After the brutal repression of Buddhism during the Maoist period, three Gelug scholars became important figures in the revival of Tibetan studies in the People's Republic of China. These were known as the “Three Polymaths”, which were Tséten Zhabdrung (1910–1985), Mugé Samten (1914–1993), and Dungkar Lozang Trinlé (1927–1997).[71]

The Mongolian Gelug school under by the 9th Jebtsundamba Khutughtu, led the revival of Mongolian Buddhism after the fall of communist rule in Mongolia in 1990. The Gelug tradition also has a strong traditional presence in modern Russian Republics like Buryatia, Kalmykia and Tuva.

Teachings

[edit]
Gelug Lineage Refuge Tree thangka depicting Je Tsongkapa at the center of the tree surrounded by Indian and Tibetan Buddhist masters. Thangkas like these are often used as a focus for taking refuge.

Steps of the path (lam rim)

[edit]

Tsongkhapa's works contain a systematic synthesis of Buddhist doctrine which provides a comprehensive vision of the Buddhist path, based on classical Indian Mahayana and Vajrayana.[72] The main Mahayana teachings are found in various texts such as Tsongkhapa's the Great Exposition of the Graded Path (Lam rim chen mo), the Middling Graded Path (Lam rim ‘bring ba), and the Small Graded Path (Lam rim chung ngu).[73] Other related works include The Three Principles of the Path, The Foundation of All Good Qualities. There are also various other expositions of the Lamrim by other figures such as the 3rd Dalai Lama's Essence of Refined Gold and Panchen Losang Chökyi Gyaltsen's Easy Path (de lam).

These Lamrim works are based on the teachings of the Indian master Atiśa (c. 11th century) in A Lamp for the Path to Awakening as well on the works of Shantideva and other Indian Madhyamaka authors.[73] According to Gelug scholastics, Tsongkhapa's presentation of the stages of the path is traced through Atisha back to Nagarjuna (who received it from Manjushri). Tsongkhapa is also said to have incorporated elements from Asanga's presentation of the path (as taught to him by Maitreya).[74]

The presentation of samatha and vipaśyanā in Tsongkhapa's Lamrim is also based on eighth-century Indian teacher Kamalaśīla's Bhāvanākrama (Stages of Meditation).[75] Another important text in Gelug is the Book of Kadam also known as the Kadam Emanation Scripture which includes teachings from Kadam masters like Atisha and Dromton.[76]

The schema of the three motivations

[edit]

As the name indicates, this is a gradual path model in which the practitioner accomplishes varying stages of contemplation and training based on classical Indian Mahayana Buddhism. The presentation of the Buddhist path begins with beings on the lowest level (those who have wrong view and are filled with afflictions) and provides a gradual, step by step path out of this state through diligent training, ethical action and contemplation.[77] According to Powers "the path is envisioned as proceeding in hierarchically arranged stages, and trainees are expected to complete each level before moving on to the next one."[77]

The Lamrim teachings are commonly organized based on three main graduated scopes of motivation:[73][78][79][80][81][82]

  • The lowest scope suitable for those who delight in cyclic existence (samsara) and desire to seek a good rebirth in higher realms. Spiritual practices that are taught for this motivation include contemplating the preciousness of our human rebirth, turning away from the eight worldly concerns, contemplating the suffering of lower rebirths, contemplation of death, the preciousness of human life, and impermanence, taking refuge in the three jewels and contemplating the karmic law of cause and effect. Another important element for this level is the practice of ethical self-discipline (sila) by avoiding the ten harmful actions and cultivating the ten wholesome actions.
  • The middle scope of those who are seeking liberation from the round of rebirths for themselves (the Sravaka or Hinayana motivation). The focus of this middle scope is cultivating renunciation and a desire for true freedom. This comes from contemplating how all forms of rebirth (even the highest forms) are unsatisfactory (duḥkha) as well as practicing the three trainings of ethics (sila), meditative stabilization (samadhi) and insight (vipasyana). This level also includes contemplating the six root delusions (kleśa) that give rise to samsara (attachment, anger, pride, ignorance, wrong views, and doubt) as well as the analysis of samsara contained in the 12 links of dependent origination. Though this level also includes insight into emptiness (shunyata), it is not as thoroughly explained as in the Mahayana.
  • The highest scope suitable for those who have great compassion and thus seek to attain full Buddhahood so as to aid the liberation of others (Mahāyāna motivation). This begins with the generation of the mind of awakening (bodhicitta), and the cultivation of love (maitrī) and compassion (karuṇā) towards all beings, and proceeds on to the cultivation of practices like the seven point mind training, "exchanging ourselves and others", tonglen, the bodhisattva vows and the six paramitas (including samatha and vipasyana meditation), culminating with the direct realization of emptiness.

The highest scope of Lamrim culminates in the Vajrayana methods to aid in the speedy attainment of Buddhahood. Higher motivations are said to build on, but not to subvert the foundation of the earlier ones.[83]

Three main elements

[edit]

In his The Three Principles of the Path, Tsongkhapa outlines the three main elements of the path to awakening as follows:[84][85][86]

  1. The intention definitely to leave cyclic existence, i.e. renunciation (naiṣkramya)
  2. Generating the intention to attain Buddhahood for the sake of all sentient beings (bodhicitta, the awakening mind)
  3. The correct view (samyak dṛṣṭi), i.e. a proper understanding of emptiness (shunyata).

According to Tsongkhapa, these three elements contain the essence of all Buddhist teachings and practices and are the common goal of all scriptures, treatises and tantras.[77] Furthermore, according to Tsongkhapa, these are not just introductory or partial elements, but essential foundations for all Buddhist practices, sutric (i.e. non-tantric Mahayana) or tantric.[87]

Reasoning and meditating on emptiness

[edit]

In Gelug, the achievement of the perfection of wisdom (prajñaparamita) requires a proper understanding of the view of emptiness. In the Lamrim chenmo, Tsongkhapa rejects the idea that all intellectual effort, concepts, and mental activity are obstacles to spiritual understanding. He also rejects certain views of emptiness, particularly the shentong (other emptiness) view, which is seen as a kind of eternalism or essentialism.[73] The proper view of emptiness in the Gelug school is considered to be the prāsangika mādhyamika philosophy of Nagarjuna and Chandrakirti as interpreted by Tsongkhapa. According to Jay Garfield, Tsongkhapa's view is "a synthesis of the epistemology and logic of Dharmakirti with the metaphysics of Nagarjuna."[88]

The correct view of emptiness is initially established through study and reasoning in order to ascertain if phenomena are the way they appear. Gelug texts contain many explanations to help one obtain a conceptual understanding of emptiness and to practice insight meditation (vipasyana). Gelug meditation includes an analytical kind of insight practice which is "the point-by-point contemplation of the logical arguments of the teachings, culminating in those for the voidness of self and all phenomena."[89]

According to John Powers:[90]

The initial use of reasoning enables the meditator to recognize that all phenomena are empty of inherent existence, and the fact that one is able to demonstrate this through reasoned proofs makes the conviction unshakable. Merely gaining a conceptual apprehension, however, is not enough: one must deepen the understanding of emptiness through repeated familiarization. The more one trains in emptiness, the deeper one’s discernment becomes, until one transcends the need for conceptual thought, and one’s awareness of emptiness reaches the level of direct perception, such that when one considers a phenomenon in meditation, one immediately apprehends its absence of inherent existence.

For Tsongkhapa, the training in insight and wisdom is closely associated with training in compassion. Training in insight into emptiness deepens compassion and vice verse. Both reinforce and strengthen each other.[91]

Vinaya

[edit]

The Gelug school focuses on ethics and monastic discipline of the vinaya as the central plank of spiritual practice. In particular, the need to pursue spiritual practice in a graded, sequential manner is emphasized. Arguably, Gelug is the only school of vajrayāna Buddhism that prescribes monastic ordination as a necessary qualification and basis in its teachers (lamas / gurus).[citation needed] Lay people are usually not permitted to give initiations if there are teachers with monastic vows within close proximity.

Vajrayāna (Secret Mantra)

[edit]
Guhyasamāja mandala with Mañjuvajra as the central deity

The tantric practices of the Gelug school are also integrated into the stages of the path model by Tsongkhapa's The Great Exposition of Secret Mantra. This is combined with the tantric deity yogas of Anuttarayoga Tantras such as the Guhyasamāja, Cakrasaṃvara, Yamāntaka and Kālacakra tantras.[10][15]

For Tsongkhapa, Vajrayana practice requires bodhicitta and insight into emptiness (through vipaśyanā meditation) as a foundation, and thus, non-tantric Mahayana (and its three principal aspects of renunciation, bodhicitta and insight into emptiness) is seen as indispensable for Vajrayana in Gelug.[92] Indeed, according to Tsongkhapa, without having ascertained emptiness, one cannot practice the tantric yogas of Vajrayana.[93]

The Gelug school also follows Tsongkhapa's view that Vajrayana is only differentiated from sutra by its special method, the esoteric practice of deity yoga, which is considered to be a much faster method than the practice of the six perfections alone.[15][94]

Tsongkhapa's tantric practice and theory focuses on the Guhyasamāja tantra, a text which he considered to be the "king of tantras".[15][95][96] Tsongkhapa referred to himself as a "Guhyasamāja yogi" and saw himself as a reviver and reformer of the tradition.[97] As such, the Guhyasamāja tantra is the principal tantra for the Gelug school. As the Dalai Lama remarks:[98]

There is a saying in the Gelug, "If one is on the move it is Guhyasamāja. If one is still, it is Guhyasamāja. If one is meditating, it should be upon Guhyasamāja." Therefore, whether one is engaged in study or practice, Guhyasamāja should be one's focus.

Tsongkhapa also incorporated the tantric practice of the Six Yogas of Naropa, and Mahamudra, from the Dagpo Kagyu lineages. This tradition was continued by the first Panchen Lama, who composed A Root Text for the Precious Gelug/Kagyü Tradition of Mahamudra.[99]

The Gelug tradition also maintains Dzogchen teachings; Lozang Gyatso, 5th Dalai Lama (1617–1682), Thubten Gyatso, 13th Dalai Lama ( 1876–1933), and Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama are some Gelug-pa Dzogchen masters.[web 1] Likewise the practice of Chöd was taught by Gelug-pas such as Kyabje Zong Rinpoche.

Unique Oral lineage

[edit]
Mañjuśrī, 18th century, Rubin Museum of Art

The Gelug tradition also has a unique lineage of oral instructions which is traced back to the teachings received by Tsongkhapa from the bodhisattva Mañjuśrī (Tib. Jampalyang). There are two main lineages of this Ganden Mañjuśrī cycle of oral instructions, these are the Ensa tradition (stemming from Gyalwa Ensapa Losang Dondrup) and the Segyu lineage (stemming from Je Sherab Sengye). The teachings of the popular Lama Chöpa practice come down through the Ensa lineage.[100]

According to David Gonsalez:[100]

Manjushri instructed Tsongkhapa to combine the teachings on the clear light and illusory body from the Guhyasamāja Tantra, the teachings on inner fire and the use of an action mudra from the Cakrasaṃvara Tantra, and the practice of Vajrabhairava, using these as a means of increasing wisdom and overcoming obstacles. With this as the foundation for his tantric practice he should establish a basis of lamrim and lojong that is centered on the practice of guru yoga. Manjushri proceeded to give Tsongkhapa detailed teachings on all aspects of the aforementioned teachings and advised him to consolidate them all into a single practice. This was the impetus for the origins of Lama Chöpa. From these instructions there arose a very secret system of guru yoga that was transmitted orally from guru to disciple.

Study

[edit]
Monks debating at Sera monastery, Tibet, 2013

Main topics and texts

[edit]

The Gelug school developed a highly structured system of scholastic study which was based on the memorization and study of key texts as well as formal debate. The primary topics and texts used in study are:[101][102]

  1. Monastic discipline (’dul ba, vinaya): Vinaya-sutra by Gunaprabha
  2. Abhidharma: Vasubandhu’s Abhidharmakosha
  3. Epistemology (tshad ma, pramana): which is based on Dharmakirti’s Pramanavarttika, a Commentary on Dignaga’s ‘Compendium of Pramana’,
  4. Madhyamaka (dbu-ma): Chandrakirti’s Madhyamakāvatāra.
  5. Prajnaparamita (phar-phyin): Maitreya's Abhisamayalankara.

All Gelug colleges study commentaries to these texts written by Tsongkhapa, Gyaltsab Je and Kedrub Je.[102]

Six texts by Tsongkhapa are also a prime source for the studies of the Gelug tradition:

  1. The Great Exposition of the Stages of the Path (Lam-rim chen-mo)
  2. The Great Exposition of Secret Mantra (sNgag-rim chenmo)
  3. The Essence of Eloquence on the Interpretive and Definitive Teachings (Drnng-nges legs-bshad snying-po)
  4. The Praise of Dependent Origination (rTen-'brel bstodpa)
  5. The Clear Exposition of the Five Stages of Guhyasamāja (gSang-'dus rim-lnga gsal-sgron) and
  6. The Golden Rosary (gSer-phreng)

Each Gelug monastery also uses its own set of commentarial textbooks (yig-cha) which were written to explain further scholastic details and interpretative issues. The various sets of Gelug textbooks differ on numerous fine points of interpretation.[102] Major textbook sets include:[102]

  • Jetsun Chokyi Gyaltsen's (1469–1544) textbooks, studied at Ganden Jangtse, Sera Je and Sera Ngagpa
  • Kedrub Tendarwa's texts (1493–1568), studied at Sera Me College
  • Panchen Sonam Dragpa's texts (1478–1554) which are studied at Drepung Losel Ling, Ganden Shartse, Gyütö and Ratö colleges,
  • Kunkyen Jamyang Zhepa (1648–1721), studied at Drepung Gomang College, Drepung Deyang College, Labrang Monastery, and most monasteries in Inner and Outer Mongolia, Buryatia, Kalmykia, and Tuva.

Course of study

[edit]
Monks debating in Sera monastery

According to Georges Dreyfus,[103]

For each topic studied, the procedure is similar. The process starts with the heuristic memorization of the root text and sometimes of its commentaries. It continues with the interpretation of the root text through commentaries, and culminates in dialectical debate.

After the study of the exoteric texts, a monk may then enter the esoteric study and practice of tantric texts, particularly the Guhyasamāja, Yamāntaka, and Cakrasamvara tantras.[104]

A monk who has completed all his studies may then attempt a geshe degree, a title rare and difficult to obtain which can take 15 to 25 years to complete.[105] According to John Powers, "although the Gélukpa tradition recognizes some people as tülkus—beings who are reincarnations of great lamas—the various levels of scholarly achievement are open to any male who is able to complete the program successfully."[106] There are no major restrictions on a monk's ability to attain the various scholastic ranks and geshe degrees other than skill, and they may come from any social class, family or region. Several Westerners have completed the degree in the modern era.[106]

Powers also writes that:[105]

the primary method of examination is oral debate, in which a monk must be able quickly to evaluate a wide range of philosophical positions, defend any of them against any other, and triumph (or at least hold his own) in a no-holds-barred intellectual contest. The debates are generally very lively...The stated purpose of the exercise is to develop the intellects of the monks, and it is felt that direct dialectical confrontation accomplishes this goal by training them to defend philosophical positions, to think on their feet, and to critically examine their doctrines and positions.

Alexander Berzin notes that in Tibet, there used to only be two examinations (rgyugs-sprod): memorization exam (blo-rgyugs) and debate exams (rtsod-rgyugs). However, according to Berzin, "since the reforms of the Fourteenth Dalai Lama in India, they must also pass each year a written exam (bri-rgyugs), a poetry composition exam (rtsom-bri), and a Tibetan culture and religious history exam (rgyal-rabs chos-byung)."[102]

After attaining a monastic degree, it is common to enter a long meditation retreat, often lasting three years or proceed to tantric (Vajrayana) studies. According to Powers "the logic behind this system is based on the idea that one should first gain a thorough grounding in Buddhist scriptures, philosophy, doctrines, and practice before engaging in full-time meditation. Trainees who thoroughly understand what they are meditating on will be less likely to go astray in meditation than those whose understanding is merely superficial."[107]

Monasteries and lineage holders

[edit]
Ganden monastery, Tibet, 2013
Sera Mey, Sera Monastery, India

Monasteries

[edit]

Tsongkhapa founded the monastery of Ganden in 1409 as his main seat. Drepung Monastery was founded by Jamyang Choje, Sera Monastery was founded by Chöje Shakya Yeshe, and Tashi Lhunpo Monastery was founded by Gyalwa Gendün Drup, the 1st Dalai Lama. These four were the largest and most powerful Gelug monasteries in Tibet. Before the Chinese occupation Ganden and Sera each had about 5,000 monks, while Drepung housed over 7,000.[citation needed]

Labrang Monastery, in Xiahe County in Gansu province (and in the traditional Tibetan province of Amdo), was founded in 1709 by the first Jamyang Zhaypa, Ngawang Tsondru. Many Gelug monasteries and temples were also built throughout Tibet as well as in China and Mongolia. Notable Gelug monasteries in Kham include Lithang,[108] Bathang, Sershul, and Dargye. In the Gyalrong region one finds some of the oldest Gelug monasteries on the eastern plateau such as Dhe-Tsang.[109]

Administration and lineage

[edit]
6th ganden tripa Chokyi Gyeltsen (1402–1473)

After Tsongkhapa's passing, his teachings were held and spread by Gyaltsab Je and Khedrup Gelek Pelzang, who were his successors as abbots of Ganden Monastery. These were the first "Ganden Tripa" (dGa’-ldan khri-pa, Ganden Throne Holder), an office which became the official head of the entire Gelug school. The lineage is still held by the present holder is Thubten Nyima Lungtok Tenzin Norbu,[110] the 102nd Ganden Tripa (and not, as often misunderstood, by the Dalai Lama).

Ganden Tripa is an elected position held by the most senior ex-abbots of Gyume and Gyuto Upper and Lower Tantric Colleges. The office lasts for seven years only.[111] This is in contrast to the other Tibetan schools, who are led either by specific tulkus (reincarnation lineages like the Karmapas) or by a specific clan (like the Sakya school, led by the Khön family).[111]

Among the main lineage holders of the Gelug are:

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Gelug (Wylie: dge lugs pa; "virtuous ones"), also known as the Yellow Hat school, is the youngest and largest of the four major traditions of , founded in 1409 by the influential Tibetan scholar and yogi (1357–1419). This tradition emphasizes rigorous monastic discipline, scholarly debate, and the integrated study of and , distinguishing it through a revival of strict observance and the adoption of yellow ceremonial hats to signify adherence to pure monastic codes originating from earlier Indian and Tibetan reforms. Central to Gelug education is the curriculum of the five major treatises—encompassing (valid cognition and logic), (middle way philosophy), (phenomenology), (perfection of wisdom), and (monastic discipline)—which monks debate and master over decades to earn the degree, a rigorous scholastic qualification. Tsongkhapa's seminal works, such as the Lamrim Chenmo (Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path), synthesize gradual path teachings from Atisha's Kadam tradition, positioning Gelug as a "New Kadam" reform movement that prioritizes logical analysis and ethical conduct alongside meditative and tantric practices. The school's primary seat is , established by Tsongkhapa, with the serving as its spiritual head, though the lineage—beginning with Tsongkhapa's disciple Gendun Drup as the first—has exerted profound doctrinal and political influence, shaping Gelug's dominance in Tibetan religious and temporal affairs since the 17th century.

Terminology

Etymology and Key Terms

The term Gelug (Tibetan: dge lugs, Wyl. dge lugs) translates to "virtuous system" or "tradition of virtue," with dge denoting moral virtue or excellence and lugs referring to a method, system, or mode of practice. This nomenclature reflects the school's emphasis on ethical discipline (vinaya) and scholarly rigor as foundational to spiritual progress, distinguishing it from earlier Tibetan Buddhist traditions. The designation emerged in the early 15th century following the reforms of Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), who sought to revive strict monastic observance and integrated philosophical analysis. Adherents are termed Gelugpa (dge lugs pa), meaning "followers of the virtuous system," a self-appellation that underscores adherence to Tsongkhapa's synthesized teachings drawing from the Kadam tradition and Prāsangika-Madhyamaka philosophy. The school is alternatively known as the Gandenpa or Ganden tradition (dga' ldan lugs), named after founded by Tsongkhapa in 1409, which evokes dga' ldan—the Tibetan transliteration of Tuṣita, the pure realm associated with the bodhisattva and Tsongkhapa's visionary inspirations. This name highlights the lineage's continuity with Tsongkhapa's visionary lineage rather than a purely sectarian label. Key terms in Gelug discourse include ("stages of the path"), a structured pedagogical framework systematized by Tsongkhapa in texts like the Lamrim Chenmo (completed 1402), which delineates progressive cultivation from initial renunciation to full through ethical conduct, meditative stabilization (samatha), and insight (vipassanā). Another central concept is grub mtha' ("tenets" or "philosophical systems"), referring to the Gelug's hierarchical classification of Indian Buddhist schools, privileging Prāsangika-Madhyamaka as the ultimate view for realizing emptiness (śūnyatā) without reification. The (dga' ldan khri pa), or "Throne Holder of Ganden," denotes the spiritual head of the tradition, embodying Tsongkhapa's lineage independently of the institution. The term , while emblematic of Gelug leadership, originates from Mongolian dalai ("ocean") conferred by on Sonam Gyatso in 1578, symbolizing vast wisdom, with lama as the Tibetan for "" or "superior one." These terms collectively emphasize Gelug's focus on disciplined scholarship, adherence, and non-sectarian integration of sūtra and .

Origins and Foundations

Tsongkhapa's Reforms

(1357–1419), a prominent Tibetan Buddhist scholar, yogi, and reformer, addressed what he saw as deviations in contemporary Tibetan Buddhist practice by reinvigorating adherence to monastic and integrating rigorous philosophical analysis with meditative discipline. His reforms emphasized the inseparability of study, reflection, and , countering lax interpretations of tantric prevalent in some earlier schools like and , which he critiqued for insufficient grounding in sutra-based ethics and . Tsongkhapa's approach privileged the Prasangika-Madhyamaka interpretation of , drawing on Indian masters like and Candrakirti, to clarify subtle points of voidness that he argued had been misconstrued, ensuring tantric practices were built on a foundation of ethical purity and logical debate. Central to his reforms was the composition of the Lamrim Chenmo (Great Exposition of the Stages of the Path) around 1402, a comprehensive synthesizing the path (lam rim) from initial virtue to full enlightenment, adaptable to practitioners of varying capacities while subordinating esoteric to exoteric foundations. This framework promoted standardized monastic curricula combining scriptural study, dialectical debate, and contemplative practice, fostering intellectual rigor over ecstatic or visionary experiences alone. Tsongkhapa also authored works like the Ngakrim Chenmo to systematize tantric sadhanas, insisting on preparatory vows and ethical conduct to prevent misuse of empowerments. In 1409, Tsongkhapa founded near as the institutional embodiment of his vision, establishing it as a model for scholarly with over 3,000 monks by his era's end and serving as the seat for his direct disciples, including Gyaltsab Je and Khedrup Je, who disseminated his teachings. These reforms laid the doctrinal and organizational groundwork for the Gelug school's eventual dominance, prioritizing causal efficacy in spiritual development through verifiable scriptural fidelity rather than unexamined tradition.

Establishment of Core Institutions

Tsongkhapa established Ganden Monastery in 1409 near Lhasa, marking the foundational institution of the Gelug school and serving as its primary seat. Named after the pure land of Ganden (Tushita in Sanskrit), it embodied Tsongkhapa's emphasis on monastic discipline, philosophical study, and tantric practice, with the Ganden Tripa position originating as the abbot's role. In 1416, Jamyang Chöje Tashi Palden, a direct disciple of Tsongkhapa, founded west of , which rapidly grew to become one of the largest monastic centers in , housing up to 10,000 monks at its peak and focusing on dialectical debate and philosophy. consolidated Gelug institutional presence, integrating administrative structures that supported scholarly assemblies and observance. Sera Monastery was founded in 1419 by Jamchen Chöje Shakya Yeshe, another key disciple of Tsongkhapa, southeast of , initially as a tantric college but evolving into a hub for logic, , and renowned for its Sera Je and Sera Mey colleges. Together with Ganden and Drepung, Sera formed the "Great Three" core Gelug institutions, collectively known as the Gadenphodrang system, which centralized doctrinal authority, monastic education, and political influence in central by the 15th century. These foundations emphasized rigorous curriculum in lam rim, prasangika , and , distinguishing Gelug from other Tibetan schools through structured institutional frameworks.

Historical Expansion and Dominance

Early Growth and Mongol Alliance

Following the death of Tsongkhapa in 1419, his direct disciples rapidly expanded the Gelug school's institutional presence in central Tibet through the foundation of key monasteries that served as centers for study and practice. Drepung Monastery was established in 1416 by Jamyang Chojé Tashi Palden, one of Tsongkhapa's foremost students, located near Lhasa and growing to become the largest monastic institution in Tibet with thousands of monks by the 16th century. Sera Monastery followed in 1419, founded by Chojé Shakya Yeshe, another key disciple, emphasizing debate and philosophical training within the Gelug curriculum. Tashilhunpo Monastery in Shigatse was initiated in 1447 by Gyalwa Gendun Drup (1391–1474), retrospectively recognized as the first Dalai Lama, further solidifying Gelug influence in western Tibet. These foundations, alongside the original Ganden Monastery established by Tsongkhapa in 1409, formed the "three great seats" of the Gelug tradition—Ganden, Drepung, and Sera—fostering a structured monastic hierarchy under the , the throne holder succeeding Tsongkhapa's lineage. The school's emphasis on rigorous discipline, logical debate, and integration of and attracted increasing patronage from local Tibetan nobility, enabling demographic growth; by the mid-16th century, Gelug monasteries housed tens of thousands of monks, outpacing rival sects in central . The pivotal Mongol alliance emerged in the late 16th century when Sonam Gyatso (1543–1588), the third in the retrospective lineage, was invited by (1507–1582), the powerful Tümed Mongol leader, to proselytize in Mongol territories. Their meeting occurred in 1578 near Kökenuur (), where , impressed by Sonam Gyatso's teachings, conferred the title ""—"ocean of wisdom"—on him, extending it retroactively to his two predecessors. In exchange, Sonam Gyatso bestowed on the title of "Bhagva" or religious king, formalizing a patron-priest relationship. This alliance catalyzed Gelug's political ascendancy, as Mongol converts provided military protection against competing Tibetan sects like the , who had prior Mongol ties under earlier khans. Altan Khan's endorsement propagated Gelug doctrines among Mongol tribes, establishing monasteries and translating texts, which by the early 17th century translated into armed support for Gelug dominance in . The court recognized the title in 1587, further legitimizing the institution internationally.

Dalai Lamas' Ascendancy and Theocratic Rule

The ascendancy of the to political power in culminated with the fifth , Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso (1617–1682), who became the first to exercise unified spiritual and temporal authority over central . Prior to his era, earlier , such as the third, Sonam Gyatso (1543–1588), had forged alliances with Mongol leaders like , securing the "" title in 1578 and enhancing Gelugpa influence, but lacked comprehensive secular rule. Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso's rise depended on military patronage from Gushri Khan, an Oirat Mongol chieftain, whose forces defeated rival Tibetan factions, including the rulers of Tsang, by 1642. In 1642, following Gushri Khan's conquests that eliminated opposition in and extended influence over much of central and western , the khan proclaimed Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso as the sovereign ruler, granting him dominion over religious and civil affairs while retaining nominal Mongol oversight. This alliance enabled the Gelugpa school to supplant competing sects, such as the dominant and lingering traditions, through both doctrinal superiority claims and coercive measures, including monastery seizures and doctrinal suppressions. The fifth reciprocated by bestowing religious titles on Gushri Khan, such as "Dharma King," integrating Mongol with Gelugpa . The establishment of the Ganden Phodrang regime in 1642 formalized this theocratic governance, with the Dalai Lama as supreme head embodying the fusion of Buddhist dharma and state administration. Administrative duties often fell to appointed regents (desi), allowing the Dalai Lama to prioritize spiritual leadership, as seen in Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso's oversight of the Potala Palace construction starting in 1645 as the new governmental and monastic seat in Lhasa. This system centralized power under Gelugpa monastic elites, enforcing vinaya discipline alongside taxation, justice, and military obligations, though reliant on Mongol and later external alliances for enforcement. Succeeding Dalai Lamas maintained this theocratic framework amid regency interludes, particularly after the fifth's death in 1682, when Sangye Gyatso concealed the passing for 15 years to preserve stability until the sixth Dalai Lama's enthronement in 1697. Political authority waxed and waned with the incumbents' ages and capacities, but the institution persisted as a monk-ruled prioritizing Gelugpa until external pressures mounted in the late . This era marked the Dalai Lamas' transformation from sectarian scholars to monarchs, sustained by a causal interplay of religious legitimacy, monastic , and strategic nomad alliances rather than indigenous Tibetan consensus alone.

Interactions with Qing Dynasty

The Fifth Dalai Lama, Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, established formal diplomatic ties with the through his state visit to from 1652 to 1653, at the invitation of the . This meeting formalized a patron-priest relationship, wherein the emperor provided political and military support to the Gelug school's theocratic rule in in exchange for spiritual legitimacy among Mongol allies who adhered to Gelug teachings. Following the Fifth 's death in 1682, internal strife and external threats, including the deposition of the Sixth in 1706 by Mongol leader Lhazang Khan with tacit Qing approval, led to further Qing involvement. The Qing launched a military expedition in 1720 to expel invading Dzungar from , restoring Gelug authority by installing the Seventh in 1720 and stationing permanent ambans (imperial residents) in from 1727 to oversee administrative and processes. This arrangement asserted Qing while allowing the substantial in religious and internal affairs. Under the (r. 1735–1796), Qing patronage of Gelug Buddhism intensified, with the emperor commissioning Tibetan Buddhist temples in , such as the Yonghegong, and personally engaging in Gelug rituals, viewing himself as an incarnation of to bolster imperial legitimacy. In 1792, formalized control over lama reincarnations through the system, requiring high lamas like the to be selected via lots drawn from a in the presence of Qing officials, though this was inconsistently applied and often evaded by Tibetan authorities. These interactions reinforced Gelug dominance in Tibet but embedded Qing oversight, enabling interventions during succession crises and rebellions, such as the 1750 suppression of a noble revolt in . The relationship waned after the Qing's decline in the , yet it exemplified strategic Qing use of Gelug's influence to stabilize frontier regions without direct .

19th-Century Challenges and Internal Dynamics

In the , the Gelug school's governance of encountered profound internal challenges stemming from protracted regencies following the premature deaths of multiple s, exacerbating factionalism among monastic elites. The , Trinley Gyatso, died on November 17, 1855, at age 18 amid suspicions of poisoning, initiating a regency vacuum that persisted until the identification and enthronement of the 13th Dalai Lama, Thubten Gyatso, in 1877 after his birth on February 12, 1876. Successive regents, drawn from influential Gelug lineages affiliated with Drepung, Sera, and Ganden monasteries, navigated a landscape of intrigue where personal ambitions intertwined with institutional loyalties, often under the watchful eye of ambans who wielded veto power over appointments via the system established in 1793. This period saw recurrent accusations of , , and ritual malfeasance, undermining the theocratic stability that had defined Gelug dominance since the . A pivotal unfolded during the regency of Demo Hutuktu Jamphel Yeshe Gyaltsen (served circa 1886–1889), whose tenure ended in disgrace amid charges of conspiring against the adolescent through sorcery, poisoning, and undue influence exerted by his brothers. Rivals, leveraging oracles and monastic networks, portrayed Demo's actions as threats to the Dalai Lama's life, leading to his deposition, imprisonment, and eventual —reportedly sanctioned by elements close to the —exposing fissures in the system where regents from rival colleges like Gomang (Drepung) clashed over fiscal control and succession privileges. Such episodes, echoed in earlier regencies like that of Tatsak Ngawang Tsondu (mid-19th century), reflected broader dynamics of monastic corruption and power brokerage, where regents amassed wealth from estate revenues—estimated at over 80% of Tibet's under Gelug control—fostering resentment and instability as Qing waned amid the dynasty's internal rebellions. Doctrinal discourse provided another arena for internal tension, with 19th-century polemics reinforcing Gelug orthodoxy while highlighting regional divides. A notable controversy centered on interpretations of Changkya Rölpé Dorjé's 1767 Song on the Profound View, Recognizing the Mother, which debated exoteric against tantric-esoteric readings of , dependent origination, and bliss-luminosity. Scholars from in , such as Belmang Könchok Gyeltsen (1764–1853), critiqued tantric emphases in works like Tenpa Rapgyé's Sun (1801–1803) as deviating from Tsongkhapa's strictures against substantialism or , prompting rebuttals from Mongolian Gelug figures like Ngawang Khedrup (1779–1838) in his 1835 Fire and Elephant treatises. These exchanges, peaking around 1833–1835, underscored institutional rivalries between , Khalkha Mongolia, and central Tibetan centers, yet affirmed Gelug scholastic vitality without fracturing unity. Parallel to these conflicts, eclectic figures like Shabkar Tsokdruk Rangdrol (1781–1851), a Gelug yogi who blended monastic discipline with realizations, illustrated latent tensions over purity versus , as Rimé non-sectarian trends gained traction in eastern . By mid-century, such dynamics compounded external pressures from Qing decline and nascent European encroachments, straining Gelug resources—evident in failed regency financial policies that devalued and ballooned debts—yet the school's institutional resilience persisted through debate and adaptation.

20th-Century Upheaval: PRC Annexation and Exile

In October 1950, the (PLA) of the (PRC) launched an of eastern , targeting the region in . On October 7, PLA forces numbering around 40,000 overwhelmed the smaller Tibetan army of approximately 8,500, capturing after brief resistance and inflicting heavy casualties. This military action, which the PRC framed as "liberation," prompted Tibet to appeal to the , leading to a condemnation of the on November 18, 1950. Following the defeat, PLA troops advanced toward , pressuring Tibetan authorities into negotiations. The was signed on May 23, 1951, in by Tibetan delegates, ostensibly affirming Chinese sovereignty while promising Tibetan , protection of , and non-interference in monastic affairs. However, evidence indicates the agreement was coerced under threat of further , with delegates isolated from and unable to communicate freely during talks. Implementation saw escalating PRC control, including land reforms and suppression of monastic influence, particularly affecting Gelug institutions central to Tibetan governance under the . Violations of the agreement's religious protections fueled resentment among Gelug lamas and lay followers, who viewed the PRC presence as an existential threat to their theocratic order. Tensions culminated in the 1959 Lhasa uprising, sparked on when approximately 30,000 Tibetans protested Chinese policies, surrounding the palace to protect the from rumored abduction. Chinese forces responded with and suppression, killing thousands. On March 17, the , disguised as a , escaped with a small entourage, guided by the Nechung Oracle's advice, and crossed into via the Khenzimane Pass on , where he received asylum. This flight marked the effective end of Gelug-led rule in and the beginning of organized . The annexation devastated Gelug monastic networks, which had dominated with major seats like Drepung (up to monks pre-1950), Sera, and Ganden serving as political and educational hubs. Post-invasion, thousands of monasteries were desecrated, looted, or demolished, with estimates of over 6,000 religious sites affected nationwide and up to monks and nuns killed, imprisoned, or forced to laicize by the 1960s, intensifying during the (1966–1976). Gelug, as the state-favored school intertwined with the Dalai Lama's authority, faced targeted repression to dismantle its influence, reducing active monastic populations to a fraction of pre-annexation levels under strict PRC oversight. In exile, the established the in Dharamsala, , in 1960, preserving Gelug lineage and teachings through reconstituted institutions. Exiled Gelug monks rebuilt monasteries such as Sera, Drepung, and Ganden abroad, attracting thousands of refugees and sustaining dialectical education and practices. This diaspora enabled Gelug's global dissemination while challenging PRC narratives of assimilation, with the Dalai Lama's leadership ensuring doctrinal continuity despite ongoing restrictions in .

Core Teachings

Lam Rim Framework

The Lam Rim, or "Stages of the Path," constitutes a foundational pedagogical framework in the Gelug tradition, systematizing the Buddha's teachings into a graduated sequence tailored to practitioners' varying capacities. This approach, derived from Atiśa's Lamp for the Path to Enlightenment (), was comprehensively elaborated by Tsongkhapa in his Lamrim Chenmo (The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment), completed in 1402 CE, which spans over 500 folios and integrates exegesis from Indian and Tibetan sources. In Gelug monasteries, the Lam Rim serves as the core curriculum for initial training, emphasizing logical progression from foundational to advanced , thereby distinguishing Gelug's methodical rigor from less structured presentations in other Tibetan schools. The framework delineates three principal scopes corresponding to the spiritual motivations of small, medium, and great capacity practitioners. For those of small capacity, the focus lies on preliminaries such as of and impermanence, taking refuge in the Three Jewels, and understanding karma's causality to foster of samsaric and aspiration for favorable rebirths. Medium-capacity practices build upon this by cultivating detachment through contemplation of the , the Twelve Links of Dependent Origination, and the three higher trainings in ethics, concentration, and wisdom, aiming for personal nirvana as an . The superior scope, for practitioners of great capacity, extends to Mahāyāna elements, generating via methods like the seven-point cause and effect or equalizing and exchanging self with others, followed by training in the six perfections (, , , effort, concentration, and ). Gelug uniquely integrates Vajrayāna practices here, positioning secret mantra methods—such as and subtle energy manipulations—as swift accelerators for those with pure karma and devotion, provided foundational Lam Rim realizations precede tantric initiation to avert spiritual pitfalls. This hierarchical structure underscores Gelug's commitment to verifiable progression, with textual study and debate ensuring practitioners confirm each stage empirically before advancing.

Emptiness via Prasangika Madhyamaka

In the Gelug tradition, emptiness (śūnyatā) is understood as the mere absence of inherent existence (svabhāva), the supposed independent, intrinsic nature of phenomena that would render them self-sufficient and uncaused. Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), the school's founder, interprets this through Prasangika Madhyamaka, emphasizing that all entities lack such inherent identity and instead exist merely as dependently arisen imputations on bases, arising from causes and conditions without autonomous essence. This view aligns emptiness directly with dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda), positing that phenomena's lack of self-existence follows precisely from their contingency on relational factors, avoiding both eternalist reification and nihilist denial of functionality. Prasangika's dialectical approach, as delineated by Tsongkhapa, relies on prasanga () to dismantle assertions of inherent existence by demonstrating their logical absurdities, without advancing positive theses of its own, in contrast to the Svatantrika school's autonomous syllogisms. Gelug exegetes, drawing on Tsongkhapa's Ocean of Reasoning, specify the object of negation as a mode of apprehending phenomena as unproduced by other factors and indivisible into parts, a subtle misconception obscuring the two truths: conventional validity, where things appear and operate reliably via shared perception and inference, and , their of intrinsic being. This framework integrates , asserting that conventional truths are established by world-bound valid cognizers, while ultimate is cognized through yogic direct perception that severs dualistic elaboration. Tsongkhapa's distinctive contribution lies in clarifying that does not negate phenomena's conventional efficacy or mere-appearance aspect, which arises interdependently without contradicting their vacuity; thus, the two truths are ontologically non-dual, with ultimate reality being the very indwelling conventional forms. Advanced Gelug practitioners cultivate this via analytical meditation on Nāgārjuna's , progressing to non-conceptual of voidness that eliminates cognitive obscurations, as elaborated in Tsongkhapa's lam rim texts. This realization, deemed the wisdom realizing non-inherentness, is pivotal for , countering innate tendencies toward reification through rigorous logical scrutiny of , aggregates, and itself.

Monastic Discipline and Vinaya

The Gelug tradition regards monastic discipline, as codified in the , as the essential foundation for ethical conduct and spiritual advancement, distinguishing it through rigorous observance of the pratimoksha vows. Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), perceiving a decline in monastic standards in 14th-century , founded in 1409 as a center for reformed practice centered on Vinaya adherence. This emphasis revitalized Tibetan monasticism by prioritizing moral purity over less structured approaches in prior traditions. In his Essence of the Vinaya Ocean, Tsongkhapa delineates pratimoksha vows as commitments arising from to abstain from harm, manifesting either as mental intentions or behavioral forms. He categorizes them into eight divisions: fasting vows for laypersons (abstaining from four root downfalls like killing and four branches like intoxicants), five lay precepts, ten vows, probationary rules, and the extensive codes for fully ordained nuns (364 rules, including eight defeats) and monks (253 rules, with four defeats such as ). These vows apply to suitable individuals across three continents, excluding those with certain physical conditions, and are lost through specific causes like formal relinquishment or , yielding benefits from worldly rebirths to ultimate enlightenment. Tsongkhapa integrated with higher ethical systems— in works like Ethical Codes for Bodhisattvas (1403) and tantric vows in Tantric Practitioner Ethics (1403)—establishing a hierarchical framework where basic monastic discipline underpins advanced practices. A 1402 assembly at Namstedeng Temple further propelled these reforms, producing commentaries that enforced accountability in Gelug institutions like Sera and Drepung, fostering university-like environments of study and debate. Unlike earlier Tibetan schools, where tantric elements sometimes relaxed disciplinary rigor, Gelug maintained the strictest guidelines, prohibiting monks from handling money, engaging in sexual activity, or consuming intoxicants, with communal mechanisms ensuring compliance.

Vajrayana Integration and Secret Mantra

The Gelug tradition integrates practices, termed Secret Mantra, as the swift path to enlightenment, subordinate to and dependent upon foundational sutric disciplines like the Lam Rim stages of the path and Prasangika realization of . Tsongkhapa (1357–1419) synthesized these elements, insisting that tantric methods—encompassing , recitation, and subtle body manipulations—require rigorous philosophical and ethical preparation to realize their non-dual intent without literalism or ethical transgression. His Great Exposition of Secret Mantra delineates the four tantra classes (Kriya, Upaya, Yoga, and Anuttarayoga), emphasizing Highest Yoga Tantra's unique capacity for actualizing mind and illusory body in one lifetime, while distinguishing tantra's pledge-bound () commitments from sutra's mere vows. Central to Gelug Secret Mantra are the generation stage, involving visualization of oneself as a meditational deity (yidam) within a mandala palace to purify ordinary perception, and the completion stage, employing winds, channels (nadi), and drops (bindu) for profound bliss-emptiness union. The tradition prioritizes three principal deity cycles from Indian Unexcelled Yoga Tantras: Guhyasamaja (with Akshobhya as central figure, focusing on union of method and wisdom consorts), Chakrasamvara (Luipa lineage, emphasizing feminine energy), and Vajrabhairava (Yamantaka in thirteen-deity form, for wrathful subjugation of ego). These practices demand empowerment (abhisheka) from a qualified guru, adherence to secrecy to safeguard against dilution or harm, and integration with monastic vinaya to channel energies ethically. Preservation of these traditions occurs through dedicated tantric colleges: Gyume (Lower Tantric College, founded 1433 in Lhasa by Sherab Sengge, a direct disciple of Tsongkhapa) and Gyuto (Upper Tantric College, established 1474 by Kunga Dondrub). Stemming from Tsongkhapa's 1414 entrustment of tantric lineages, these institutions specialize in ritual performance, multiphonic chanting (Gyume's mountain-echo style, Gyuto's ocean-rolling), and retreat-based mastery, using commentaries like Sherab Sengge's for Gyume and Kunga Dondrub's for Gyuto. Post-1959 exile, they relocated to India (Gyume in Karnataka, Gyuto near Dharamsala), maintaining unbroken transmission amid diaspora challenges.

Educational Practices

Curriculum and Textual Study

The Gelug school's monastic curriculum emphasizes rigorous textual study of , structured around five principal subjects derived from key Indian treatises, studied primarily through commentaries by Tsongkhapa (1357–1419) and his direct disciples, Gyaltsab Je (1364–1432) and Khedrub Je (1385–1438). This approach prioritizes logical analysis of foundational doctrines, integrating sutra-based exegesis with an emphasis on Prasangika interpretation, as systematized by Tsongkhapa in works like his Essence of Eloquence on the Interpretive and Definitive Teachings (drang nges legs bshad snying po), which delineates provisional and definitive vehicles. Preliminary studies include Collected Topics (par khang), covering basic logic, , and to prepare monks for advanced texts, typically beginning after initial memorization of ritual liturgies and basic rules. The core syllabus then progresses through the five great treatises: (1) (monastic discipline), rooted in Gunaprabha's Vinaya Sutra, focusing on ethical precepts and community governance; (2) , based on Vasubandhu's Treasury of Abhidharma (Abhidharmakosha), analyzing phenomena, , and cosmology; (3) (valid cognition), drawn from Dharmakirti's Commentary on Valid Cognition (Pramanavarttika), examining perception, inference, and debate methodology; (4) , centered on Chandrakirti's Entrance to the Middle Way (Madhyamakavatara), elucidating and two truths; and (5) (perfection of wisdom), via the Ornament of Clear Realization (Abhisamayalankara), detailing the path to through into non-duality. Textual engagement involves extensive memorization—often thousands of pages—followed by line-by-line explication (bshad pa) from Gelug-specific commentaries, such as Tsongkhapa's Golden Rosary of Explanations on or Khedrub Je's works on , ensuring fidelity to Indian sources while resolving interpretive disputes through Tsongkhapa's syntheses. Mastery culminates in the degree, awarded after 15–25 years of study, with levels like Lharampa (highest) requiring comprehensive examinations on these texts, historically administered at monasteries such as Sera, Drepung, and Ganden. Supplementary readings include Tsongkhapa's Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment (lam rim chen mo), which integrates the five subjects into a graduated path framework, and select tantric texts for advanced monastics, though study remains segregated and oath-bound until proficiency is achieved. This curriculum, formalized in the following Tsongkhapa's reforms, distinguishes Gelug from other Tibetan schools by its scholastic intensity and reliance on Dharmakirti's epistemology to validate claims.

Dialectical Debate and Logical Analysis

Dialectical debate constitutes a cornerstone of Gelug monastic education, fostering rigorous logical scrutiny of Buddhist doctrines through adversarial questioning and syllogistic reasoning. This practice, central to the curricula at principal monasteries such as Sera, Drepung, and Ganden, derives from Tsongkhapa's (1357–1419) revival of Indian Buddhist logic traditions, emphasizing analytical precision to penetrate subtle philosophical concepts like emptiness and dependent origination. In formal debate sessions, participants assume roles as tsong nyen (challenger) and dam nyen (defender), with the challenger posing queries rooted in the works of logicians Dignāga and , often employing to expose contradictions in opponents' positions. Defenders respond by upholding theses via autonomous syllogisms, while physical gestures—such as hand-slapping to punctuate arguments—underscore the intensity of the exchange, held daily or in structured annual cycles to refine argumentative skills. The preliminary bsdus grwa (Collected Topics) stage introduces foundational dialectical rules, progressing to advanced analysis of the five major texts: , valid cognition, , Monastic Discipline, and Phenomenology. This methodical progression aims to cultivate non-conceptual insight, distinguishing Gelug's scholastic rigor from more meditative emphases in other Tibetan lineages, though critiques note potential over-reliance on verbal analysis at the expense of direct realization. Logical analysis in Gelug, particularly through , rejects self-established logical laws as inherently existent, instead using reasoning to dismantle reification while affirming conventional validity for pedagogical purposes. Empirical studies of practitioners have observed synchronized neural patterns during sessions, suggesting cognitive benefits in and rapid , though such findings remain preliminary.

Institutions and Leadership

Principal Monasteries

The principal monasteries of the Gelug tradition are Ganden, Drepung, and Sera, collectively referred to as the "three great seats" (grwa-tshang gsum) and serving as the primary centers of learning, monastic discipline, and doctrinal transmission since the school's founding. These institutions, located in the Lhasa Valley, historically housed tens of thousands of monks and emphasized rigorous study of the Gelug curriculum, including philosophy, debate, and tantric practices. Ganden Monastery (dga' ldan rnam par rgyal ba gling), established in 1409 by Tsongkhapa Lozang Drakpa himself atop Wangbur Mountain east of , functions as the foundational or "mother" monastery of the Gelug lineage, named after the pure realm of and embodying the school's emphasis on pure vows and scholarship. It originally comprised three colleges—Shartse, Jangtse, and Gyema—and remains the seat of the , the spiritual head of the tradition. Drepung Monastery ('bras spungs), founded in 1416 by Jamyang Chojé Tashi Palden (1397–1449), a key disciple of Tsongkhapa, at the base of Mount Gephel west of , grew to become the world's largest monastic complex, accommodating up to 10,000 monks at its peak and serving as a hub for advanced philosophical studies. Organized into colleges such as Loseling and Ngagpa, it played a pivotal role in Gelug administration and education. Sera Monastery (se ra), initiated in 1419 by Jamchen Chojé Shakya Yeshe (1354–1435), another prominent disciple of Tsongkhapa, north of at the foot of Mount Chagpori, specializes in dialectical debate and sutric studies, with its three colleges—Jey, Mey, and Dratsang—fostering rigorous logical analysis central to Gelug pedagogy. Known for its daily debate sessions, Sera historically enrolled several thousand monks and contributed significantly to the tradition's intellectual output.

Lineage Structures: Ganden Tripa and Dalai Lama

The , or Ganden Throne-Holder, serves as the supreme spiritual authority of the Gelug school, directly succeeding (1357–1419), the school's founder and its first holder of the position. This role, based at established by Tsongkhapa in 1409 near , emphasizes scholarly excellence, meditative accomplishment, and institutional oversight rather than . Holders are selected through a rigorous process evaluating candidates' mastery of Gelug curricula, including debate proficiency and prior leadership in major monasteries like Sera, Drepung, or Ganden itself; the term lasts seven years, after which the incumbent often receives the honorary title of Ganden Trisur. Unlike reincarnate lineages, the Ganden Tripa embodies continuity through merit-based appointment, tracing an unbroken succession of over 100 incumbents since Tsongkhapa, who systematized Gelug doctrines on philosophy, Lam Rim stages of the path, and discipline. Historically, Ganden Tripas have preserved doctrinal purity amid political upheavals, such as during the 17th-century ascendancy of the Fifth Dalai Lama's theocratic government, where they maintained independence from temporal power while advising on monastic reforms. Notable figures include the 97th , (1903–1984), tutor to the , who exemplified the position's focus on textual exegesis and debate training. The lineage, integrated into Gelug as a (reincarnated lama) series, originated with Gendun Drup (1391–1474), a chief disciple of Tsongkhapa who founded and was retroactively designated the First for his embodiment of Avalokiteshvara's compassionate activity. The title "," meaning "Ocean of Wisdom," was conferred in 1578 by Mongol leader on Sonam Gyatso (1543–1588), the third in the line, formalizing Gelug-Mongol alliances that bolstered the school's influence across . Subsequent s, particularly the Fifth (1617–1682), consolidated political authority over with Mongol and later Qing support, establishing the government in 1642, which intertwined spiritual and secular rule until 1959. While the Ganden Tripa holds formal primacy as Gelug's doctrinal guardian—often described as spiritually superior due to election by merit—the has wielded greater temporal influence, serving as head during periods of centralized governance and . This distinction underscores Gelug's dual structure: the Tripa's role prioritizes and succession to Tsongkhapa's vision, whereas the 's reincarnate status and networks have driven , as seen in the 14th 's (born ) global outreach post-1959 . Appointments of recent Ganden Tripas, such as the 104th (Jetsun Lobsang , 2017–term end), have involved endorsement, reflecting adapted leadership amid diaspora challenges, though purists emphasize the Tripa's independence from political entanglement.

Influence and Dissemination

Spread to Mongolia and Inner Asia

The spread of Gelug Buddhism to Mongolia began in the late 16th century through the alliance between Tümed Mongol leader Altan Khan and Sonam Gyatso, a prominent Gelug scholar retrospectively recognized as the 3rd Dalai Lama. In 1578, Altan Khan invited Sonam Gyatso to his territory near the Kökenuur Lake, where the lama delivered extensive teachings on Gelug doctrines, leading to Altan Khan's conversion and the establishment of a mutual patron-priest relationship. Altan Khan conferred the title "Dalai Lama" on Sonam Gyatso, meaning "ocean of wisdom" in Mongolian, and supported the construction of Mongolia's first Gelug monastery, Thegchen Chonkhor Ling, in 1577–1578. This encounter facilitated the dissemination of Gelug texts, practices, and monastic institutions among Mongol tribes, particularly the Khalkha and Tümed, marking the initial phase of Gelug dominance over earlier shamanistic and other Buddhist influences. The alliance deepened in subsequent generations, with the , Yonten Gyatso (1589–1617), born to a Mongolian noble family descended from , symbolizing the integration of Gelug leadership with Mongol aristocracy. By the , Qoshot Mongol chieftain (1582–1655) extended military patronage to the , Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, invading in 1641–1642 to subdue rival sects and establish Gelug political hegemony under the Dalai Lamas. This reciprocal support reinforced Gelug's institutional spread in , where monasteries proliferated and lamas received training in , solidifying the school's predominance by the Qing era. In , Gelug transmission reached Oirat Mongols, precursors to , via scholars like Zaya Pandita Namkhaijamts (1599–1662), who studied Gelug under Tibetan masters from 1617 to 1639 before propagating it among through translations into the he devised around 1648. Zaya Pandita established khuruls (monasteries) as early as 1616 and emphasized Gelug vows and tantric practices, aiding the school's entrenchment despite Oirat migrations to the in the 1630s. Among in , Gelug arrived in the early 17th century via Mongolian intermediaries, with adoption accelerating mid-century through cross-border monastic exchanges and the founding of datsans, such as those in the area by the 18th century. These extensions integrated Gelug with local shamanic elements while maintaining core Tibetan lineages, extending the school's reach across nomad societies.

Modern Global Reach and Adaptations

The exile of the following the against Chinese forces prompted the relocation of key Gelug institutions to , where monasteries such as those affiliated with Sera, Drepung, and Ganden were reestablished in areas like and . This preserved core Gelug lineages amid political disruption, enabling gradual international dissemination through visiting teachers and refugee monks. The Dalai Lama's global tours, commencing in the 1960s, introduced Gelug teachings to Western audiences, with his 1989 amplifying visibility and attracting lay interest in and . Prominent Gelug-affiliated organizations have expanded the tradition's footprint. The Foundation for the Preservation of the Mahayana Tradition (FPMT), established in 1975 by Gelug lamas and Zopa Rinpoche, coordinates over 160 centers, projects, and services across more than 30 countries, including Nalanda Monastery in as its first Western monastic establishment. Similarly, Gaden for the West, under Acharya Zasep Tulku Rinpoche, operates meditation centers in , the , and , emphasizing traditional practices. The , as spiritual head, supports this outreach; the 104th visited FPMT's international office in 2017, underscoring institutional ties. Adaptations for global contexts maintain doctrinal fidelity while accommodating non-monastic lifestyles. FPMT programs offer structured study of Gelug texts like Tsongkhapa's Lamrim Chenmo, alongside meditation retreats and online resources in multiple languages, facilitating access for lay practitioners without vows. English translations of key commentaries and practical guides, such as Rinpoche's How to Live and Die, address contemporary concerns like ethics and end-of-life practices. The Dalai Lama's dialogues via the Mind and Life Institute since 1987 explore intersections with and physics, presenting Gelug —rooted in Prāsangika —without diluting its emphasis on scriptural authority and debate. These efforts prioritize empirical alignment with tradition over , though practitioner numbers remain estimates, with Gelug comprising the largest segment of Tibetan Buddhism's global adherents, estimated in the millions.

Controversies and Critiques

Dorje Shugden Schism

The emerged within the Gelug tradition as a dispute over the of a wrathful regarded by adherents as an enlightened protector of Tsongkhapa's teachings, but labeled by opponents as a potentially harmful worldly spirit. The practice originated in the as a minor cult among some Gelug and practitioners, gaining prominence in the early 20th century through the efforts of Pabongkha (1878–1941), who composed extensive sadhanas and promoted it as a guardian against deviations from pure Gelug doctrine. By the mid-20th century, it had become widespread in Gelug monasteries, including among tutors to the , such as Trijang (1901–1983), who initiated the into the practice during his youth. Proponents argue that embodies the fierce aspect of , safeguarding the integrity of philosophy against syncretism with other Tibetan schools, while critics, including the , contend it fosters sectarian exclusivity and has historically been linked to obstacles for those engaging in non-Gelug practices. The schism intensified in the 1970s when the 14th Dalai Lama, initially supportive, publicly renounced the practice after personal experiences of illness and perceived interferences, attributing them to Dorje Shugden's displeasure with his ecumenical engagements, such as receiving Nyingma initiations. He escalated opposition in the 1990s, culminating in a formal ban announced on March 3, 1996, during teachings in Dharamsala, where he urged practitioners to abandon the deity, warning of spiritual and communal harm, including risks to Tibetan unity and his own life. The Dalai Lama cited historical precedents, such as 19th-century Gelug lamas falling ill after Dzogchen studies, as evidence of the spirit's punitive nature, framing the ban as necessary to preserve non-sectarian Buddhism amid the Tibetan exile community's challenges. Critics, including former Gelug scholars, challenge this as unsubstantiated, noting the Dalai Lama's shift aligned with his promotion of Rimé (non-sectarian) ideals, potentially to consolidate authority by marginalizing purist factions resistant to inter-school integrations. Enforcement of the ban led to significant divisions, with Dorje Shugden loyalists facing expulsions from monasteries like Sera, Ganden, and Drepung, where forced renunciations via petitions were demanded, affecting thousands of monks by the late 1990s. Reports document violence against practitioners in settlements, including assaults, , and social , with incidents such as the 1997 of three monks at amid tensions, though attributions vary between factions. The , aligned with the , has denied orchestrating harm, emphasizing voluntary compliance, yet pro-Shugden groups cite rhetoric from Dalai Lama events as inciting , including boycotts of businesses owned by practitioners. A major outcome was the establishment of independent organizations, notably the (NKT) founded in 1991 by Geshe Kelsang Gyatso (1931–2022), a former disciple of Trijang , in the , which centers as its principal protector and critiques the ban as suppressing Gelug purity. The NKT, now operating over 1,000 centers worldwide, has organized protests against the [Dalai Lama](/page/Dalai Lama), including large demonstrations in 1996–1998 and 2010s campaigns labeling him a "religious tyrant," escalating the rift into international protests with thousands participating in and elsewhere. While NKT adherents maintain the practice aids ethical discipline and doctrinal fidelity, detractors accuse it of promoting Gelug exceptionalism, though empirical assessments of sectarian harm remain contested, with no independent verification of supernatural claims on either side. The persists, fracturing Gelug unity in exile and highlighting tensions between tradition preservation and adaptive .

Dalai Lama Succession Disputes

The succession of the in the Gelug tradition follows a process rooted in Tibetan Buddhist practices, involving the identification of a child exhibiting spiritual signs, such as dreams, oracles, and recognition of possessions from the previous incarnation, followed by rigorous testing. This method, employed since the formal establishment of the lineage in the 16th century, has occasionally faced internal disputes over recognition but gained geopolitical dimensions after China's annexation of in 1951. Tensions escalated with the exile of the , Tenzin Gyatso, to in 1959 following the Tibetan uprising, as asserted administrative control over religious institutions in . In 1995, the recognized Gedhun Choekyi Nyima as the 11th , a key figure in Dalai Lama reincarnations, but Chinese authorities abducted the six-year-old on May 17, 1995, and he has not been seen publicly since; then installed Gyaincain Norbu as its preferred candidate, establishing a precedent for parallel claimants. 's 2007 Regulations on the Management of the Reincarnation of Living Buddhas mandate state approval for high-ranking lamas' reincarnations, including the , framing it as protection of religious freedom under socialist principles, though Tibetan exiles and practitioners view it as political interference undermining spiritual autonomy. The has addressed succession variably; in 2011, he suggested the institution might cease with him to prevent manipulation, but on July 2, 2025, he issued a statement affirming its continuation through , with the Gaden Phodrang Trust—his longstanding religious office—holding sole authority to oversee the search and verification per established traditions, explicitly rejecting external interference. dismissed this as invalid, reiterating that reincarnations must comply with Chinese laws and historical precedents like oversight, warning that non-approved successors would lack legitimacy. This stance risks a , with potential for the exile community to recognize one child and another, as seen with the , exacerbating divisions within and Gelug followers globally. International observers, including five UN experts on September 18, 2025, condemned China's prospective role as undue interference in religious practices, urging respect for Tibetan autonomy in spiritual matters. Geopolitically, the dispute implicates , host to the since 1959 and over 100,000 Tibetan exiles, where succession could occur outside Chinese jurisdiction, heightening Sino-Indian border tensions amid China's claims over reincarnations as a issue. Tibetan traditionalists emphasize that transcends state control, rooted in karmic continuity rather than political appointment, while Beijing's approach prioritizes national security and .

Historical Governance and Social Criticisms

The government, established in 1642 by the Fifth Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso, centralized authority in under Gelugpa leadership following the military conquests of Mongol chieftain Gushri Khan, who defeated rival factions and conferred temporal power on the . This theocratic regime integrated spiritual and secular rule through the principle of chösi sungdril (union of religious and political authority), with the as supreme head, supported by a council of high lamas, aristocratic officials, and monastic representatives. Administrative functions were handled by bodies such as the (cabinet of four ministers) and the Tsongdu (assembly), though real power often rested with regents during the frequent minorities of incarnations or interregnums, leading to periods of factional intrigue among Gelug elites. The system persisted until its dissolution in 1959 amid Chinese military intervention, maintaining nominal under Qing and later Republican Chinese oversight while exercising autonomy in internal affairs. ![Potala Palace, seat of Ganden Phodrang government][float-right] The social order under Ganden Phodrang rule was characterized by a manorial feudal economy, where monasteries and controlled over 90% of and resources, with the population stratified into lords (including Gelug institutions holding vast ), hereditary serfs (mi ser), and a small class of free traders or nomads. Serfs were bound to , providing labor for up to two-thirds of the year on , , and estate maintenance, alongside taxes equivalent to 50-70% of agricultural yields in grain, butter, or cash, enforced through hereditary obligation with limited legal recourse beyond appeals to distant monastic courts. Critics, including anthropological studies of the era, have highlighted the system's rigidity, with minimal —serfs could not freely relocate without lordly permission or payment of "human lease" fees, and violations often incurred mutilation, flogging, or exile as codified punishments. The heavy monastic presence, comprising 15-25% of males in central , diverted labor and resources from productive , fostering and dependency, as Gelug institutions amassed wealth through land grants, donations, and tax exemptions while resisting reforms. This structure perpetuated inequality, with aristocratic and clerical elites exempt from taxation and serfs bearing the burden, including usurious loans that entrenched ; historical accounts note instances of estate sales including attached serfs, underscoring commodification of labor despite doctrinal emphases on . Such features drew condemnation from 19th- and early 20th-century European observers for resembling medieval European but with intensified theocratic control, limiting , technological adoption, and individual freedoms beyond monastic hierarchies.

Chinese State Interference

The Chinese government has exerted extensive control over Gelug institutions in Tibet since the , including mandatory political in monasteries such as Sera, Drepung, and Ganden, where monks are required to undergo "patriotic re-education" sessions emphasizing loyalty to the over traditional religious authority. Surveillance systems, including cameras and party-appointed management committees, monitor daily activities in these Gelug centers, limiting independent religious practice and enforcing caps on monk numbers, such as evicting thousands from monasteries since 2016 to align with state demographic controls. A pivotal example of direct interference occurred in 1995 with the abduction of , the six-year-old boy recognized by the as the 11th [Panchen Lama](/page/Panchen Lama)—a key Gelug lineage holder traditionally involved in confirming the Dalai Lama's —three days after his identification on May 14, after which Chinese authorities installed their own candidate, , as a state-sanctioned alternative, rendering Nyima the world's youngest known political prisoner with no verified sightings since May 17, 1995. This action, justified by under historical Qing-era precedents for approving reincarnations, has been criticized by UN experts as a violation of religious , preemptively positioning to influence the next Dalai Lama's selection. In preparation for the 14th Dalai Lama's succession, Chinese regulations since 2007 mandate state approval for high lama reincarnations, including Gelug figures, with recent assertions in 2024-2025 reinforcing that any successor must be born in China and vetted by the government, prompting warnings from and UN experts against such interference as it undermines Tibetan autonomy in spiritual matters. The , under oversight, has expanded its role since the in reshaping Gelug practices, establishing party-controlled institutes that prioritize "Sinicization" by integrating Marxist ideology into monastic curricula and sidelining devotion to the exiled . These measures, including 2025 revisions to temple administration rules, systematically enforce ideological conformity in Gelug sites, resulting in arrests of for possessing images or resisting controls, as documented in cases from the Tibetan Center for Human Rights and Democracy reporting hundreds of detentions annually for religious-political activities. While Chinese state media portrays these as protective governance preserving Tibetan culture within a unified , independent reports highlight causal links to suppressed self-immolations—over 150 since 2009, many by Gelug monks protesting interference—and eroded monastic independence, prioritizing regime stability over empirical religious continuity.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.