Hubbry Logo
Anti-fascismAnti-fascismMain
Open search
Anti-fascism
Community hub
Anti-fascism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Anti-fascism
Anti-fascism
from Wikipedia

Anti-fascism is a political movement in opposition to fascist ideologies, groups and individuals. Beginning in European countries in the 1920s, it was at its most significant shortly before and during World War II, where the Axis powers were opposed by many countries forming the Allies of World War II and dozens of resistance movements worldwide. Anti-fascism has been an element of movements across the political spectrum and holding many different political positions such as anarchism, communism, pacifism, republicanism, social democracy, socialism and syndicalism as well as centrist, conservative, liberal and nationalist viewpoints.

Fascism, a far-right ultra-nationalistic ideology best known for its use by the Italian Fascists and the German Nazis, became prominent beginning in the 1910s. Organization against fascism began around 1920. Fascism became the state ideology of Italy in 1922 and of Germany in 1933, spurring a large increase in anti-fascist action, including German resistance to Nazism and the Italian resistance movement. Anti-fascism was a major aspect of the Spanish Civil War, which foreshadowed World War II.

Before World War II, the West had not taken seriously the threat of fascism, and anti-fascism was sometimes associated with communism. However, the outbreak of World War II greatly changed Western perceptions, and fascism was seen as an existential threat by not only the communist Soviet Union but also by the liberal-democratic United States and United Kingdom. The Axis Powers of World War II were generally fascist, and the fight against them was characterized in anti-fascist terms. Resistance during World War II to fascism occurred in every occupied country, and came from across the ideological spectrum. The defeat of the Axis powers generally ended fascism as a state ideology.

After World War II, the anti-fascist movement continued to be active in places where organized fascism continued or re-emerged. There was a resurgence of antifa in Germany in the 1980s, as a response to the invasion of the punk scene by neo-Nazis. This influenced the antifa movement in the United States in the late 1980s and 1990s, which was similarly carried by punks. In the 21st century, this greatly increased in prominence as a response to the resurgence of the radical right, especially after the 2016 election of Donald Trump.[1][2]

Origins

[edit]
A print depicting Roman armour and accessories including two versions of the fasces (lower right)
Modern fasces symbol

A fasces (/ˈfæsz/ FASS-eez; Latin: [ˈfaskeːs]; a plurale tantum, from the Latin word fascis, meaning 'bundle'; Italian: fascio littorio) is a bound bundle of wooden rods, often but not always including an axe (occasionally two axes) with its blade emerging. The fasces is an Italian symbol that had its origin in the Etruscan civilization and was passed on to ancient Rome, where it symbolized a Roman king's power to punish his subjects,[3] and later, a magistrate's power and jurisdiction. They were carried in a procession with a magistrate by lictors, who carried the fasces and at times used the birch rods as punishment to enforce obedience with magisterial commands.[4] In common language and literature, the fasces were regularly associated with certain offices: praetors were referred to in Greek as the hexapelekys (lit.'six axes') and the consuls were referred to as "the twelve fasces" as literary metonymy.[5] Beyond serving as insignia of office, it also symbolised the Roman Republic and its prestige.[6]

After the classical period, with the fall of the Roman state, thinkers were removed from the "psychological terror generated by the original Roman fasces" in the antique period. By the Renaissance, there emerged a conflation of the fasces with a Greek fable first recorded by Babrius in the second century AD depicting how individual sticks can be easily broken but how a bundle could not be.[7] This story is common across Eurasian culture and by the thirteenth century AD was recorded in the Secret History of the Mongols.[8] While there is no historical connection between the original fasces and this fable,[9] by the sixteenth century AD, fasces were "inextricably linked" with interpretations of the fable as one expressing unity and harmony.[8] Italian Fascism, which derives its name from the fasces, arguably used this symbolism the most in the 20th century.

With the development and spread of Italian Fascism, i.e. the original fascism, the National Fascist Party's ideology was met with increasingly militant opposition by Italian communists and socialists. Organizations such as Arditi del Popolo[10] and the Italian Anarchist Union emerged between 1919 and 1921, to combat the nationalist and fascist surge of the post-World War I period.

In the words of historian Eric Hobsbawm, as fascism developed and spread, a "nationalism of the left" developed in those nations threatened by Italian irredentism (e.g. in the Balkans, and Albania in particular).[11] After the outbreak of World War II, the Albanian and Yugoslav resistances were instrumental in antifascist action and underground resistance. This combination of irreconcilable nationalisms and leftist partisans constitute the earliest roots of European anti-fascism. Less militant forms of anti-fascism arose later. During the 1930s in Britain, "Christians – especially the Church of England – provided both a language of opposition to fascism and inspired anti-fascist action".[12] French philosopher Georges Bataille believed that Friedrich Nietzsche was a forerunner of anti-fascism due to his derision for nationalism and racism.[13]

Michael Seidman argues that traditionally anti-fascism was seen as the purview of the political left but that in recent years this has been questioned. Seidman identifies two types of anti-fascism, namely revolutionary and counterrevolutionary:[14]

  • Revolutionary anti-fascism was expressed amongst communists and anarchists, where it identified fascism and capitalism as its enemies and made little distinction between fascism and other forms of right-wing authoritarianism.[15] It did not disappear after the Second World War but was used as an official ideology of the Soviet bloc, with the "fascist" West as the new enemy.
  • Counterrevolutionary anti-fascism was much more conservative in nature, with Seidman arguing that Charles de Gaulle and Winston Churchill represented examples of it and that they tried to win the masses to their cause. Counterrevolutionary antifascists desired to ensure the restoration or continuation of the prewar old regime and conservative antifascists disliked fascism's erasure of the distinction between the public and private spheres. Like its revolutionary counterpart, it would outlast fascism once the Second World War ended.

Seidman argues that despite the differences between these two strands of anti-fascism, there were similarities. They would both come to regard violent expansion as intrinsic to the fascist project. They both rejected any claim that the Versailles Treaty was responsible for the rise of Nazism and instead viewed fascist dynamism as the cause of conflict. Unlike fascism, these two types of anti-fascism did not promise a quick victory but an extended struggle against a powerful enemy. During World War II, both anti-fascisms responded to fascist aggression by creating a cult of heroism which relegated victims to a secondary position.[14] However, after the war, conflict arose between the revolutionary and counterrevolutionary anti-fascisms; the victory of the Western Allies allowed them to restore the old regimes of liberal democracy in Western Europe, while Soviet victory in Eastern Europe allowed for the establishment of new revolutionary anti-fascist regimes there.[16] Some anti-fascist groups justify political violence as a reaction to violence by their opponents.[17]

Counterrevolutionary anti-fascism

[edit]
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Winston Churchill
Charles de Gaulle

Counterrevolutionary anti-fascism, also known as conservative and liberal anti-fascism, refers to the opposition to fascism grounded in the defense of democracy, constitutional order, and traditional institutions. Unlike revolutionary anti-fascism, which aims for social and political transformation, counterrevolutionary anti-fascism is focused on preserving or restoring pre-war political systems, such as constitutional monarchies and republics based on Enlightenment ideals.[18][19][20][21]

This form of anti-fascism is often associated with prominent figures such as Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill and Charles de Gaulle, who opposed fascist authoritarianism while also resisting revolutionary movements that sought to radically change society.[19][22] It was supported by a broad coalition of groups, including capitalists, trade unionists, social democrats, and traditionalists, all of whom united in their opposition to fascism and their support for political stability.[19][20][22]

Counterrevolutionary anti-fascism sought to challenge fascist ideologies and movements, aiming to preserve existing democratic structures and stabilize society. It focused on reinforcing confidence in democratic governance and addressing extremist movements, setting itself apart from revolutionary anti-fascism, which frequently aimed at challenging capitalist systems.[19][20]

In Britain, conservative anti-fascism primarily concentrated on maintaining democratic governance and marginalizing fascist groups through legal and institutional means.[23][21] Liberal anti-fascism, on the other hand, opposed fascism through media campaigns, petitions, parliamentary debates, and public discourse. Both forms recognized fascism as a threat to state stability, and both approached revolutionary ideologies, including communism, with caution.[23][21] British counterrevolutionary anti-fascism in the 1930s was shaped by an alliance that transcended traditional political divisions. Churchill's leadership was pivotal in creating an antifascist front that included both conservative and social democratic figures.[23][21] This coalition rejected the idea that fascism was the only way to prevent communism and instead promoted a defense of "ordered freedom," which emphasized representative democracy, religious tolerance, and private property.[23][21] Through organizations like the Anti-Nazi Council, the counterrevolutionary antifascist movement rallied elites across the political spectrum, including trade unionists and churchmen, to oppose fascism and preserve liberal democracy.[23][21] This broader vision of antifascism, distinct from Marxist and communist approaches, helped shape Britain’s resistance to Nazi aggression.[21][23]

French counterrevolutionary anti-fascism, particularly in the years leading up to and during World War II, was characterized by opposition to both Italian Fascism and German Nazism.[24] Figures such as Benjamin Crémieux, a Jewish intellectual, criticized Mussolini's anti-parliamentarianism and the Fascist regime's approach to democracy, expressing concern about a potential alignment between Italian Fascism and far-right movements in France.[24] Meanwhile, journals like L’Europe Nouvelle and individuals such as Georges Bernanos and Charles de Gaulle opposed the policy of appeasement, emphasizing the potential dangers of Fascism's totalitarianism.[24] They also critiqued the French right’s minimization of the threats posed by Hitler and Mussolini and advocated for an anti-fascist stance, which, in some cases, included support for alliances with the Soviet Union despite differing views on Communism.[24] This counterrevolutionary anti-fascism was influenced by concerns over national sovereignty, democracy, and resistance to totalitarian movements.[24]

In the United States, a coalition of liberals and conservatives, particularly under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, opposed fascism through both political and military means, with an emphasis on preserving democratic institutions in the face of growing fascist threats.[19][22][25] American counterrevolutionary anti-fascism emerged as a response to the increasing spread of fascism in Europe and the potential for its expansion into the Western Hemisphere.[19][22][25] Initially, Roosevelt navigated a delicate balance, adopting limited measures to avoid alienating isolationist sentiment while preparing for the possibility of war.[19][22][25] As Germany's expansion progressed, Roosevelt shifted towards providing more active support for Britain and its allies, eventually securing public and political backing for military aid.[19][22][25] Despite opposition from isolationists and anti-interventionists, Roosevelt's administration, supported by business and labor leaders, increasingly aligned with anti-fascist forces.[19][22][25] This shift in American foreign policy reinforced the country's focus on countering Nazi Germany, reducing the influence of isolationists, and establishing an anti-fascist position.[19][22][25] Examples of anti-fascist propaganda in the United States are the films Hitler's Reign of Terror (1934),[26] often credited as being the "first-ever American anti-Nazi film,"[27] and Don't Be a Sucker (1943).[28][29][30][31]

History

[edit]
Italian partisans in Milan during the final insurrection leading to the liberation of Italy in April 1945

Anti-fascist movements emerged first in Italy during the rise of Benito Mussolini,[32] but they soon spread to other European countries and then globally. In the early period, Communist, socialist, anarchist and Christian workers and intellectuals were involved. Until 1928, the period of the United front, there was significant collaboration between the Communists and non-Communist anti-fascists.

In 1928, the Comintern instituted its ultra-left Third Period policies, ending co-operation with other left groups, and denouncing social democrats as "social fascists". From 1934 until the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, the Communists pursued a Popular Front approach, of building broad-based coalitions with liberal and even conservative anti-fascists. As fascism consolidated its power, and especially during World War II, anti-fascism largely took the form of partisan or resistance movements.

Italy: against Fascism and Mussolini

[edit]
An Italian partisan in Florence, 14 August 1944, during the liberation of Italy
Flag of Arditi del Popolo, an axe cutting a fasces. Arditi del Popolo was a militant anti-fascist group founded in 1921 in Italy

In Italy, Mussolini's Fascist regime used the term anti-fascist to describe its opponents. Mussolini's secret police was officially known as the Organization for Vigilance and Repression of Anti-Fascism. During the 1920s in the Kingdom of Italy, anti-fascists, many of them from the labor movement, fought against the violent Blackshirts and against the rise of the fascist leader Benito Mussolini. After the Italian Socialist Party (PSI) signed a pacification pact with Mussolini and his Fasces of Combat on 3 August 1921,[33] and trade unions adopted a legalist and pacified strategy, members of the workers' movement who disagreed with this strategy formed Arditi del Popolo.[32]

The Italian General Confederation of Labour (CGL) and the PSI refused to officially recognize the anti-fascist militia and maintained a non-violent, legalist strategy, while the Communist Party of Italy (PCd'I) ordered its members to quit the organization. The PCd'I organized some militant groups, but their actions were relatively minor.[32] The Italian anarchist Severino Di Giovanni, who exiled himself to Argentina following the 1922 March on Rome, organized several bombings against the Italian fascist community.[34] The Italian liberal anti-fascist Benedetto Croce wrote his Manifesto of the Anti-Fascist Intellectuals, which was published in 1925.[35] Other notable Italian liberal anti-fascists around that time were Piero Gobetti and Carlo Rosselli.[36]

1931 badge of a member of Concentrazione Antifascista Italiana

Concentrazione Antifascista Italiana (English: Italian Anti-Fascist Concentration), officially known as Concentrazione d'Azione Antifascista (Anti-Fascist Action Concentration), was an Italian coalition of Anti-Fascist groups which existed from 1927 to 1934. Founded in Nérac, France, by expatriate Italians, the CAI was an alliance of non-communist anti-fascist forces (republican, socialist, nationalist) trying to promote and to coordinate expatriate actions to fight fascism in Italy; they published a propaganda paper entitled La Libertà.[37][38][39]

Flag of Giustizia e Libertà, anti-fascist movement active from 1929 to 1945

Giustizia e Libertà (English: Justice and Freedom) was an Italian anti-fascist resistance movement, active from 1929 to 1945.[40] The movement was cofounded by Carlo Rosselli,[40] Ferruccio Parri, who later became Prime Minister of Italy, and Sandro Pertini, who became President of Italy, were among the movement's leaders.[41] The movement's members held various political beliefs but shared a belief in active, effective opposition to fascism, compared to the older Italian anti-fascist parties. Giustizia e Libertà also made the international community aware of the realities of fascism in Italy, thanks to the work of Gaetano Salvemini.

Many Italian anti-fascists participated in the Spanish Civil War with the hope of setting an example of armed resistance to Franco's dictatorship against Mussolini's regime; hence their motto: "Today in Spain, tomorrow in Italy".[42]

Between 1920 and 1943, several anti-fascist movements were active among the Slovenes and Croats in the territories annexed to Italy after World War I, known as the Julian March.[43][44] The most influential was the militant insurgent organization TIGR, which carried out numerous sabotages, as well as attacks on representatives of the Fascist Party and the military.[45][46] Most of the underground structure of the organization was discovered and dismantled by the Organization for Vigilance and Repression of Anti-Fascism (OVRA) in 1940 and 1941,[47] and after June 1941 most of its former activists joined the Slovene Partisans.

During World War II, many members of the Italian resistance left their homes and went to live in the mountains, fighting against Italian fascists and German Nazi soldiers during the Italian Civil War. Many cities in Italy, including Turin, Naples and Milan, were freed by anti-fascist uprisings.[48]

Slovenians and Croats under Italianization

[edit]
Lojze Bratuž, a Slovenian choirmaster and composer who was martyerd by fascists for singing Christmas songs in Slovenian at mass with his choir.

The anti-fascist resistance emerged within the Slovene minority in Italy (1920–1947), whom the Fascists meant to deprive of their culture, language and ethnicity.[citation needed] The 1920 burning of the National Hall in Trieste, the Slovene center in the multi-cultural and multi-ethnic Trieste by the Blackshirts,[49] was praised by Benito Mussolini (yet to become Il Duce) as a "masterpiece of the Triestine fascism" (capolavoro del fascismo triestino).[50] The use of Slovene in public places, including churches, was forbidden, not only in multi-ethnic areas, but also in the areas where the population was exclusively Slovene.[51] Children, if they spoke Slovene, were punished by Italian teachers who were brought by the Fascist State from Southern Italy. Slovene teachers, writers, and clergy were sent to the other side of Italy.

The first anti-fascist organization, called TIGR, was formed by Slovenes and Croats in 1927 in order to fight Fascist violence. Its guerrilla fight continued into the late 1920s and 1930s.[52] By the mid-1930s, 70,000 Slovenes had fled Italy, mostly to Slovenia (then part of Yugoslavia) and South America.[53]

The Slovene anti-fascist resistance in Yugoslavia during World War II was led by Liberation Front of the Slovenian People. The Province of Ljubljana, occupied by Italian Fascists, saw the deportation of 25,000 people, representing 7.5% of the total population, filling up the Rab concentration camp and Gonars concentration camp as well as other Italian concentration camps.

Germany: against the NSDAP and Hitlerism

[edit]
1928 Roter Frontkämpferbund rally in Berlin. Organized by the Communist Party of Germany, the RFB had at its height over 100,000 members.
Iron Front Three Arrows through the NSDAP Swastika

The specific term anti-fascism was primarily used[citation needed] by the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), which held the view that it was the only anti-fascist party in Germany. The KPD formed several explicitly anti-fascist groups such as Roter Frontkämpferbund (formed in 1924 and banned by the Social Democrats in 1929) and Kampfbund gegen den Faschismus (a de facto successor to the latter).[54][55][need quotation to verify][56][need quotation to verify] At its height, Roter Frontkämpferbund had over 100,000 members. In 1932, the KPD established the Antifaschistische Aktion as a "red united front under the leadership of the only anti-fascist party, the KPD".[57] Under the leadership of the committed Stalinist Ernst Thälmann, the KPD primarily viewed fascism as the final stage of capitalism rather than as a specific movement or group, and therefore applied the term broadly to its opponents, and in the name of anti-fascism the KPD focused in large part on attacking its main adversary, the centre-left Social Democratic Party of Germany, whom they referred to as social fascists and regarded as the "main pillar of the dictatorship of Capital."[58]

The movement of Nazism, which grew ever more influential in the last years of the Weimar Republic, was opposed for different ideological reasons by a wide variety of groups, including groups which also opposed each other, such as social democrats, centrists, conservatives and communists. The SPD and centrists formed Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold in 1924 to defend liberal democracy against both the Nazi Party and the KPD, and their affiliated organizations. Later, mainly SPD members formed the Iron Front which opposed the same groups.[59]

The name and logo of Antifaschistische Aktion remain influential. Its two-flag logo, designed by Max Gebhard [de] and Max Keilson [de], is still widely used as a symbol of militant anti-fascists in Germany and globally,[60] as is the Iron Front's Three Arrows logo.[61]

Spain: Civil War against the Nationalists

[edit]
Anarchists in Barcelona. The civil war was fought between the anarchist territories and stateless lands that achieved workers' self-management, and capitalist areas of Spain controlled by the autocratic Nationalist faction.

The historian Eric Hobsbawm wrote: "The Spanish civil war was both at the centre and on the margin of the era of anti-fascism. It was central, since it was immediately seen as a European war between fascism and anti-fascism, almost as the first battle in the coming world war, some of the characteristic aspects of which – for example, air raids against civilian populations – it anticipated."[62]

In Spain, there were histories of popular uprisings in the late 19th century through to the 1930s against the deep-seated military dictatorships[63] of General Prim and Primo de Rivera.[64] These movements further coalesced into large-scale anti-fascist movements in the 1930s, many in the Basque Country, before and during the Spanish Civil War. The republican government and army, the Antifascist Worker and Peasant Militias (MAOC) linked to the Communist Party (PCE),[65] the International Brigades, the Workers' Party of Marxist Unification (POUM), Spanish anarchist militias, such as the Iron Column and the autonomous governments of Catalonia and the Basque Country, fought the rise of Francisco Franco with military force.

Woman with a rifle, soldier of Mujeres Libres, Confederal militias Barcelona, 1936 Spanish Civil War

The Friends of Durruti, associated with the Federación Anarquista Ibérica (FAI), were a particularly militant group. Thousands of people from many countries went to Spain in support of the anti-fascist cause, joining units such as the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, the British Battalion, the Dabrowski Battalion, the Mackenzie-Papineau Battalion, the Naftali Botwin Company and the Thälmann Battalion, including Winston Churchill's nephew, Esmond Romilly.[66] Notable anti-fascists who worked internationally against Franco included: George Orwell (who fought in the POUM militia and wrote Homage to Catalonia about his experience), Ernest Hemingway (a supporter of the International Brigades who wrote For Whom the Bell Tolls about his experience), and the radical journalist Martha Gellhorn.

The Spanish anarchist guerrilla Francesc Sabaté Llopart fought against Franco's regime until the 1960s, from a base in France. The Spanish Maquis, linked to the PCE, also fought the Franco regime long after the Spanish Civil war had ended.[67]

France: against Action Française and Vichy

[edit]
1934 demonstration in Paris, with a sign reading "Down with fascism"
Maquis members in 1944

In the 1920s and 1930s in the French Third Republic, anti-fascists confronted aggressive far-right groups such as the Action Française movement in France, which dominated the Latin Quarter students' neighborhood.[citation needed] After fascism triumphed via invasion, the French Resistance (French: La Résistance française) or, more accurately, resistance movements fought against the Nazi German occupation and against the collaborationist Vichy régime. Resistance cells were small groups of armed men and women (called the maquis in rural areas), who, in addition to their guerrilla warfare activities, were also publishers of underground newspapers and magazines such as Arbeiter und Soldat (Worker and Soldier) during World War Two, providers of first-hand intelligence information, and maintainers of escape networks.[citation needed]

United Kingdom: against Mosley's BUF

[edit]

The rise of Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists (BUF) in the 1930s was challenged by the Communist Party of Great Britain, socialists in the Labour Party and Independent Labour Party, anarchists, Irish Catholic dockmen and working class Jews in London's East End. A high point in the struggle was the Battle of Cable Street, when thousands of local residents and others turned out to stop the BUF from marching. Initially, the national Communist Party leadership wanted a mass demonstration at Hyde Park in solidarity with Republican Spain, instead of a mobilization against the BUF, but local party activists argued against this. Activists rallied support with the slogan They shall not pass, adopted from Republican Spain.

There were debates within the anti-fascist movement over tactics. While many East End ex-servicemen participated in violence against fascists,[68] Communist Party leader Phil Piratin denounced these tactics and instead called for large demonstrations.[69] In addition to the militant anti-fascist movement, there was a smaller current of liberal anti-fascism in Britain; Sir Ernest Barker, for example, was a notable English liberal anti-fascist in the 1930s.[70]

United States, World War II

[edit]
American singer-songwriter and anti-fascist Woody Guthrie and his guitar labelled "This machine kills fascists"

Anti-fascist Italian expatriates in the United States founded the Mazzini Society in Northampton, Massachusetts, in September 1939 to work toward ending Fascist rule in Italy. As political refugees from Mussolini's regime, they disagreed among themselves whether to ally with Communists and anarchists or to exclude them. The Mazzini Society joined with other anti-Fascist Italian expatriates in the Americas at a conference in Montevideo, Uruguay, in 1942. They unsuccessfully promoted one of their members, Carlo Sforza, to become the post-Fascist leader of a republican Italy. The Mazzini Society dispersed after the overthrow of Mussolini as most of its members returned to Italy.[71][72]

During the Second Red Scare which occurred in the United States in the years that immediately followed the end of World War II, the term "premature anti-fascist" came into currency and it was used to describe Americans who had strongly agitated or worked against fascism, such as Americans who had fought for the Republicans during the Spanish Civil War, before fascism was seen as a proximate and existential threat to the United States (which only occurred generally after the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and only occurred universally after the attack on Pearl Harbor). The implication was that such persons were either Communists or Communist sympathizers whose loyalty to the United States was suspect.[73][74][75] However, the historians John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr have written that no documentary evidence has been found of the US government referring to American members of the International Brigades as "premature antifascists": the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Strategic Services, and United States Army records used terms such as "Communist", "Red", "subversive", and "radical" instead. Indeed, Haynes and Klehr indicate that they have found many examples of members of the XV International Brigade and their supporters referring to themselves sardonically as "premature antifascists".[76]

Burma, World War II

[edit]

The Anti-Fascist Organisation (AFO) was a resistance movement which advocated the independence of Burma and fought against the Japanese occupation of Burma during World War II. It was the forerunner of the Anti-Fascist People's Freedom League. The AFO was formed during a meeting which was held in Pegu in August 1944, the meeting was held by the leaders of the Communist Party of Burma (CPB), the Burma National Army (BNA) led by General Aung San, and the People's Revolutionary Party (PRP), later renamed the Burma Socialist Party.[77][78] Whilst in Insein prison in July 1941, CPB leaders Thakin Than Tun and Thakin Soe had co-authored the Insein Manifesto, which, against the prevailing opinion in the Burmese nationalist movement led by the Dobama Asiayone, identified world fascism as the main enemy in the coming war and called for temporary cooperation with the British in a broad allied coalition that included the Soviet Union. Soe had already gone underground to organise resistance against the Japanese occupation, and Than Tun as Minister of Land and Agriculture was able to pass on Japanese intelligence to Soe, while other Communist leaders Thakin Thein Pe and Thakin Tin Shwe made contact with the exiled colonial government in Simla, India. Aung San was War Minister in the puppet administration which was set up on 1 August 1943 and included the Socialist leaders Thakin Nu and Thakin Mya.[77][78] During a meeting which was held between 1 and 3 March 1945, the AFO was reorganized as a multi-party front which was named the Anti-Fascist People's Freedom League.[79]

Poland, World War II

[edit]
Proclamation of the Anti-Fascist Bloc, 15 May 1942

The Anti-Fascist Bloc was an organization of Polish Jews formed in the March 1942 in the Warsaw Ghetto. It was created after an alliance between leftist-Zionist, communist and socialist Jewish parties was agreed upon. The initiators of the bloc were Mordechai Anielewicz, Józef Lewartowski (Aron Finkelstein) from the Polish Workers' Party, Josef Kaplan from Hashomer Hatzair, Szachno Sagan from Poale Zion-Left, Jozef Sak as a representative of socialist-Zionists and Izaak Cukierman with his wife Cywia Lubetkin from Dror. The Jewish Bund did not join the bloc though they were represented at its first conference by Abraham Blum and Maurycy Orzech.[80][81][82][83]

After World War II

[edit]
Anti-fascist graffiti in San Sebastián, Spain
Antifascist sticker in Warsaw, Poland.

The anti-fascist movements which emerged during the period of classical fascism, both liberal and militant, continued to operate after the defeat of the Axis powers in response to the resilience and mutation of fascism both in Europe and elsewhere. In Germany, as Nazi rule crumbled in 1944, veterans of the 1930s anti-fascist struggles formed Antifaschistische Ausschüsse, Antifaschistische Kommittees, or Antifaschistische Aktion groups, all typically abbreviated to "antifa".[84] The socialist government of East Germany built the Berlin Wall in 1961, and the Eastern Bloc referred to it officially as the "Anti-fascist Protection Rampart". Resistance to fascists dictatorships in Spain and Portugal continued, including the activities of the Spanish Maquis and others, leading up to the Spanish transition to democracy and the Carnation Revolution, respectively, as well as to similar dictatorships in Chile and elsewhere. Other notable anti-fascist mobilisations in the first decades of the post-war period include the 43 Group in Britain.[85]

Liberation of Italy parade in Turin on 6 May 1945.

The war ends in Italy on 2 May 1945, with the complete surrender of German and RSI forces to the Allied forces, as formally established during the so-called Surrender at Caserta on 29 April 1945, marks the definitive defeat of Nazism and Fascism in Italy. By 1 May, all of northern Italy was liberated from occupation, including Bologna (21 April), Genoa (23 April), Milan (25 April), Turin[86] and Venice (28 April). The liberation put an end to two and a half years of German occupation, five years of war, and twenty-three years of fascist dictatorship. The aftermath of World War II left Italy bitter toward the monarchy for endorsing the Fascist regime for over 20-plus years. These frustrations contributed to a revival of the Italian republican movement.[87] The liberation symbolically represents the beginning of the historical journey which led to the referendum of 2 June 1946, when Italians opted for the end of the monarchy and the creation of the Italian Republic. This was followed by the adoption of the 1948 Constitution of the Republic,[88] created by the Constituent Assembly and representatives from the anti-fascist forces that defeated the Nazis and the Fascists during the liberation of Italy and the Italian civil war.[89]

With the start of the Cold War between the former World War II allies of the United States and the Soviet Union, the concept of totalitarianism became prominent in Western anti-communist political discourse as a tool to convert pre-war anti-fascism into post-war anti-communism.[90][91][92][93][94]

Modern antifa politics can be traced to opposition to the infiltration of Britain's punk scene by white power skinheads in the 1970s and 1980s, and the emergence of neo-Nazism in Germany following the fall of the Berlin Wall. In Germany, young leftists, including anarchists and punk fans, renewed the practice of street-level anti-fascism. Columnist Peter Beinart writes that "in the late '80s, left-wing punk fans in the United States began following suit, though they initially called their groups Anti-Racist Action (ARA) on the theory that Americans would be more familiar with fighting racism than they would be with fighting fascism".[95]

Italy

[edit]
Anti-fascist demonstration at Porta San Paolo in Rome, Italy, on the occasion of the Liberation Day on 25 April 2013

Today's Italian constitution is the result of the work of the Constituent Assembly, which was formed by the representatives of all the anti-fascist forces that contributed to the defeat of Nazi and Fascist forces during the liberation of Italy.[96]

Liberation Day is a national holiday in Italy that commemorates the victory of the Italian resistance movement against Nazi Germany and the Italian Social Republic, puppet state of the Nazis and rump state of the fascists, in the Italian Civil War, a civil war in Italy fought during World War II, which takes place on 25 April. The date was chosen by convention, as it was the day of the year 1945 when the National Liberation Committee of Upper Italy (CLNAI) officially proclaimed the insurgency in a radio announcement, propounding the seizure of power by the CLNAI and proclaiming the death sentence for all fascist leaders (including Benito Mussolini, who was shot three days later).[97]

ANPI logo

Associazione Nazionale Partigiani d'Italia (ANPI; "National Association of Italian Partisans") is an association founded by participants of the Italian resistance against the Italian Fascist regime and the subsequent Nazi occupation during World War II. ANPI was founded in Rome in 1944[98] while the war continued in northern Italy. It was constituted as a charitable foundation on 5 April 1945. It persists due to the activity of its antifascist members. ANPI's objectives are the maintenance of the historical role of the partisan war by means of research and the collection of personal stories. Its goals are a continued defense against historical revisionism and the ideal and ethical support of the high values of freedom and democracy expressed in the 1948 constitution, in which the ideals of the Italian resistance were collected.[99] Since 2008, every two years ANPI organizes its national festival. During the event, meetings, debates, and musical concerts that focus on antifascism, peace, and democracy are organized.[100]

Bella ciao (instrumental only version performed by the Band of the Guard of the Serbian Armed Forces)

Bella ciao (Italian pronunciation: [ˈbɛlla ˈtʃaːo]; "Goodbye beautiful") is an Italian folk song modified and adopted as an anthem of the Italian resistance movement by the partisans who opposed nazism and fascism, and fought against the occupying forces of Nazi Germany, who were allied with the fascist and collaborationist Italian Social Republic between 1943 and 1945 during the Italian Civil War. Versions of this Italian anti-fascist song continue to be sung worldwide as a hymn of freedom and resistance.[101] As an internationally known hymn of freedom, it was intoned at many historic and revolutionary events. The song originally aligned itself with Italian partisans fighting against Nazi German occupation troops, but has since become to merely stand for the inherent rights of all people to be liberated from tyranny.[102][103]

Germany

[edit]
Logo of Antifaschistische Aktion, the militant anti-fascist network in 1930s Germany that inspired the antifa movement
The logo as it appears on a flag held by an antifa protester in Cologne, 2008

The contemporary antifa movement in Germany comprises different anti-fascist groups which usually use the abbreviation antifa and regard the historical Antifaschistische Aktion (Antifa) of the early 1930s as an inspiration, drawing on the historic group for its aesthetics and some of its tactics, in addition to the name. Many new antifa groups formed from the late 1980s onward. According to Loren Balhorn, contemporary antifa in Germany "has no practical historical connection to the movement from which it takes its name but is instead a product of West Germany's squatter scene and autonomist movement in the 1980s".[104]

One of the biggest antifascist campaigns in Germany in recent years was the ultimately successful effort to block the annual Nazi-rallies in the east German city of Dresden in Saxony which had grown into "Europe's biggest gathering of Nazis".[105] Unlike the original Antifa which had links to the Communist Party of Germany and which was concerned with industrial working-class politics, the late 1980s and early 1990s, autonomists were independent anti-authoritarian libertarian Marxists and anarcho-communists not associated with any particular party. The publication Antifaschistisches Infoblatt, in operation since 1987, sought to expose radical nationalists publicly.[106]

German government institutions such as the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Federal Agency for Civic Education describe the contemporary antifa movement as part of the extreme left and as partially violent. Antifa groups are monitored by the federal office in the context of its legal mandate to combat extremism.[107][108][109][110] The federal office states that the underlying goal of the antifa movement is "the struggle against the liberal democratic basic order" and capitalism.[108][109] In the 1980s, the movement was accused by German authorities of engaging in terrorist acts of violence.[111]

Greece

[edit]

In Greece, anti-fascism is a popular part of leftist and anarchist culture, September 2013 anti-fascist hip-hop artist Pavlos 'Killah P' Fyssas was accosted and attacked with bats and knives by a large group of Golden Dawn affiliated people leaving Pavlos to be pronounced dead at the hospital. The attack lead international protests and riots, the retaliatory shooting of three Golden Dawn members outside of their Neo Irakleio as well as condemnations against the party by politicians and other public figures, including Prime Minister Antonis Samaras.[citation needed] This episode led to Golden Dawn to being criminally investigated, with the result in sixty-eight members of Golden Dawn being declared part of a criminal organization whilst fifteen out of the seventeen members accused in Pavlos's murder were convicted,[112] "effectively banning" the party.[113]

United States

[edit]

Dartmouth College historian Mark Bray, author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, credits the ARA as the precursor of modern antifa groups in the United States. In the late 1980s and 1990s, ARA activists toured with popular punk rock and skinhead bands in order to prevent Klansmen, neo-Nazis and other assorted white supremacists from recruiting.[114][115] Their motto was "We go where they go" by which they meant that they would confront far-right activists in concerts and actively remove their materials from public places.[116] In 2002, the ARA disrupted a speech in Pennsylvania by Matthew F. Hale, the head of the white supremacist group World Church of the Creator, resulting in a fight and twenty-five arrests. In 2007, Rose City Antifa, likely the first group to utilize the name antifa, was formed in Portland, Oregon.[117][118][119] Other antifa groups in the United States have other genealogies. In 1987 in Boise, Idaho, the Northwest Coalition Against Malicious Harassment (NWCAMH) was created in response to the Aryan Nation's annual meeting near Hayden Lake, Idaho. The NWCAMH brought together over 200 affiliated public and private organizations, and helped people, across six states—Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming.[120] In Minneapolis, Minnesota, a group called the Baldies was formed in 1987 with the intent to fight neo-Nazi groups directly. In 2013, the "most radical" chapters of the ARA formed the Torch Antifa Network[121] which has chapters throughout the United States.[122] Other antifa groups are a part of different associations such as NYC Antifa or operate independently.[123]

Modern antifa in the United States is a highly decentralized movement. Antifa political activists are anti-racists who engage in protest tactics, seeking to combat fascists and racists such as neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other far-right extremists.[124] This may involve digital activism, harassment, physical violence, and property damage[125] against those whom they identify as belonging to the far-right.[126][127] According to antifa historian Mark Bray, most antifa activity is nonviolent, involving poster and flyer campaigns, delivering speeches, marching in protest, and community organizing on behalf of anti-racist and anti-white nationalist causes.[128][118]

A June 2020 study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies of 893 terrorism incidents in the United States since 1994 found one attack staged by an anti-fascist that led to a fatality (the 2019 Tacoma attack, in which the attacker, who identified as an anti-fascist, was killed by police), while attacks by white supremacists or other right-wing extremists resulted in 329 deaths.[129][130][131] Since the study was published, one homicide has been connected to anti-fascism.[129] A DHS draft report from August 2020 similarly did not include "antifa" as a considerable threat, while noting white supremacists as the top domestic terror threat.[132]

There have been multiple efforts to discredit antifa groups via hoaxes on social media, many of them false flag attacks originating from alt-right and 4chan users posing as antifa backers on Twitter.[133][134] Some hoaxes have been picked up and reported as fact by right-leaning media.[135][136]

During the George Floyd protests in May and June 2020, the Trump administration blamed antifa for orchestrating the mass protests. Analysis of federal arrests did not find links to antifa.[137] There had been repeated calls by the Trump administration to designate antifa as a terrorist organization,[138] a move that academics, legal experts and others argued would both exceed the authority of the presidency and violate the First Amendment.[139][140][141]

Elsewhere

[edit]

Some post-war anti-fascist action took place in Romania under the Anti-Fascist Committee of German Workers in Romania, founded in March 1949.[142] A Swedish group, Antifascistisk Aktion, was formed in 1993.[143]

Following a similar decision by American president Donald Trump, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán announced in September 2025 that Hungary would classify "Antifa" as a terrorist organization. Orbán justified this classification by denouncing the violence that occurred in Budapest in 2023, where anti-fascist activists attacked alleged participants in the Day of Honor, a neo-Nazi event, even though anti-fascist groups are not very politically active in Hungary, where Orbán's party has exercised almost total control for more than 15 years, and even though it is a decentralized ideological movement with no formal hierarchical structure, rather than an organized group.[144][145]

Use of the term

[edit]

The Christian Democratic Union of Germany politician Tim Peters notes that the term is one of the most controversial terms in political discourse.[146] Michael Richter, a researcher at the Hannah Arendt Institute for Research on Totalitarianism, highlights the ideological use of the term in the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc, in which the term fascism was applied to Eastern bloc dissidents regardless of any connection to historical fascism, and where the term anti-fascism served to legitimize the ruling government.[147]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Anti-fascism denotes organized political opposition to fascist doctrines, which emphasize ultranationalism, dictatorial authority, and the curtailment of individual liberties through state coercion. Originating in Europe during the interwar period, it arose as a reaction to Benito Mussolini's March on Rome in 1922 and the subsequent consolidation of fascist power in Italy, followed by Adolf Hitler's ascent in Germany in 1933, with early groups employing street-level confrontations and paramilitary formations to disrupt fascist organizing.
Historically, anti-fascist efforts achieved notable successes in resisting fascist expansion, such as the Italian Arditi del Popolo's initial clashes with in the 1920s and the broader partisan warfare conducted by communist, socialist, and anarchist fighters during , which contributed to the liberation of occupied territories in and . Key events include the 1936 in , where diverse coalitions halted a march, and the ' involvement in the against Franco's nationalists from 1936 to 1939, though these alliances often fractured along ideological lines, with communist factions suppressing rivals under Soviet influence. In the postwar era, anti-fascism persisted in countering neo-Nazi revivals, evolving into decentralized networks like Germany's Antifa in the , which targeted groups through intelligence gathering and physical disruption. Contemporary manifestations, particularly in the United States and since the , focus on confronting alt-right and identitarian gatherings, frequently employing tactics that involve masked participants, property vandalism, and assaults on perceived adversaries, as documented in clashes at events like the 2017 Charlottesville rally. Empirical analyses reveal antifa-linked actions predominantly feature non-lethal violence in protest settings, with no recorded murders attributed to the movement in the U.S. since 1994, yet contributing to broader unrest including and doxxing, prompting debates over whether such methods undermine liberal norms by preemptively silencing dissent rather than relying on .

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Core Principles

Anti-fascism denotes political movements and ideologies dedicated to opposing , characterized historically as active resistance to authoritarian regimes emphasizing , totalitarian state control, , and suppression of dissent. The term originated in the early amid opposition to Benito Mussolini's Fascist Party in , where "antifascista" described groups rejecting the fascist merger of state and corporate power alongside aggressive . This opposition extended to analogous movements like in , framing anti-fascism as a defensive stance against ideologies prioritizing national rebirth through dictatorial means over pluralistic governance. Core principles of historical anti-fascism centered on safeguarding democratic institutions, individual liberties, and against fascist encroachments, often rooted in Enlightenment-derived values of pluralism and rational discourse. Participants spanned ideological spectrums, including socialists, liberals, and conservatives, united by the "antifascist minimum" of moral and political rejection of fascism's hierarchical, expansionist . Unlike fascism's positive program, anti-fascism functioned primarily as negation—preventing fascist consolidation via electoral, propagandistic, or countermeasures—though it lacked a singular affirmative , leading to tactical divergences such as legal versus street confrontations. In practice, these principles manifested in commitments to "no platform" policies, denying fascists public forums to propagate views, and collective self-defense against threats, as seen in early Italian and German anti-fascist formations. Empirical assessments note that while anti-fascist efforts sometimes curbed fascist advances—e.g., through united fronts in —they occasionally aligned with illiberal actors, underscoring causal complexities where opposition to one did not preclude endorsement of alternatives. Scholarly analyses, often influenced by prevailing academic orientations, tend to emphasize anti-fascism's democratic credentials, yet first-principles evaluation reveals its efficacy hinged on broader societal resilience rather than inherent ideological superiority.

Historical Etymology and Variations

The term anti-fascism (Italian: antifascismo) first emerged in in the immediate aftermath of Benito Mussolini's founding of the on March 23, 1919, as opponents—primarily socialists, anarchists, and disillusioned nationalists—began framing their resistance to the movement's squads and nationalist . This usage crystallized with the formation of the ("Daring Ones of the People") on July 31, 1921, a of former , republicans, and workers who explicitly organized to counter fascist Blackshirt violence through street-level confrontations in cities like and . The term denoted not mere ideological disagreement but practical opposition to fascism's tactic of using (armed intimidation) to dismantle socialist unions and liberal institutions, with early anti-fascists documenting over 300 clashes by mid-1922. As Mussolini consolidated power following the in October 1922 and enacted repressive laws by 1926, antifascismo evolved in terminology to encompass both clandestine networks and exiled coalitions, such as the Concentrazione Antifascista formed in in 1927 by figures like , emphasizing united opposition across socialist, democratic, and republican lines. The English derivative "anti-fascism" appeared in print by the late , derived via prefixation of "anti-" to "," with the tracing its formation to this morphological process, though earliest attestations in English contexts reflect translations of Italian and German usages amid rising European tensions. In , where National Socialism drew from Italian models, the term Antifaschismus gained traction after Hitler's appointment as chancellor on January 30, 1933; the (KPD) launched on December 10, 1932, as a front for militant resistance, abbreviating to Antifa from antifaschistisch to signify proactive disruption of Nazi rallies. Historical variations in anti-fascist terminology highlighted strategic and ideological divergences: militant variants prioritized action-oriented names like Arditi del Popolo or Antifaschistische Aktion, focusing on physical neutralization of fascist organizers, whereas intellectual and diplomatic strands employed broader phrases such as Giustizia e Libertà (Justice and Liberty), founded by Carlo Rosselli in 1929, to advocate ethical republicanism and propaganda against totalitarianism. Anarchist-influenced groups often eschewed formal labels, embedding anti-fascism within class-war rhetoric, as seen in Spanish CNT-FAI militias during the 1936 civil war, while liberal usages—evident in British or French contexts—stressed legal and electoral defenses without endorsing violence. These terminological shifts reflected causal realities: early anti-fascism targeted fascism's street-level coercion before state capture, but post-1933 variants adapted to underground or international fronts, sometimes diluting specificity as communist parties under Comintern directives framed it as anti-capitalist struggle, per the 1935 Popular Front policy. Symbols like the three arrows—adopted by German Social Democrats in 1931 to pierce "economic miracles, Versailles, and [Nazi] resurrection"—further varied iconography, denoting multifaceted opposition beyond verbal terminology.

Historical Origins and Early Movements

Counterrevolutionary Anti-Fascism

Counterrevolutionary anti-fascism denotes opposition to fascist movements from conservative, liberal, and moderate reformist perspectives, emphasizing the defense of established institutions, parliamentary democracy, and constitutional order against fascism's disruptive and violence, without advocating or radical socioeconomic overhaul. This form of resistance contrasted with socialist or communist anti-fascism by prioritizing restoration of pre-fascist liberal frameworks over transformative ideologies, often viewing fascism as a chaotic extension of postwar unrest akin to in its threat to traditional hierarchies and . In interwar , it manifested primarily among elites, intellectuals, and centrist politicians who accommodated aspects of fascism initially but recoiled from its totalizing tendencies. In , the cradle of , counterrevolutionary anti-fascism surfaced amid the squadristi violence of 1919–1922, where liberal and conservative figures decried Mussolini's as undermining the Giolittian liberal era's stability. Figures like former Francesco Saverio Nitti, a liberal democrat, criticized fascist intimidation of elections and trade unions, fleeing into exile in 1924 after refusing to endorse Mussolini's regime. Catholic conservatives affiliated with Luigi Sturzo's Italian Popular Party (PPI) similarly opposed fascist assaults on local governance, with Sturzo exiled in 1924 following dissolution of the PPI in November 1926. These efforts remained fragmented, as many conservatives pragmatically allied with Mussolini post-March on Rome on October 28, 1922, perceiving his coalition as a bulwark against socialist upheaval, evidenced by King Victor Emmanuel III's appointment of Mussolini as on , 1922. The pivotal episode unfolded in the Matteotti Crisis of 1924, triggered by the June 10 murder of socialist deputy by fascist assailants under , which galvanized non-socialist opposition. On June 27, 1924, roughly 130–150 deputies from liberal, democratic, Popular, and Unitary Socialist parties initiated the Aventine Secession, withdrawing from the to convene separately on the , demanding Mussolini's resignation, investigation of the murder, and free elections. Led by liberals Giovanni Amendola and , the bloc issued manifestos condemning fascist lawlessness while appealing to the monarchy and military for intervention, reflecting a commitment to constitutionalism over extralegal action. Amendola organized the Concentrazione Antifascista in 1922, uniting liberals and democrats against , but internal divisions—exacerbated by socialists' reluctance to fully integrate—and Mussolini's intransigence doomed the effort; by December 1925, he declared opposition illegal, leading to arrests and exile for participants. The king's inaction underscored the limits of elite counterrevolutionary resistance, as fascist consolidation via the 1925–1926 exceptional laws dismantled parliamentary opposition by November 1926. Intellectually, philosopher epitomized this strand, maintaining a liberal critique of as antithetical to ethical and ; from , he refused the fascist oath for professors, authored essays like A History of Europe (1932) implicitly contrasting fascist with Enlightenment , and served as a symbolic non-conformist senator until 1943. Yet, Croce's accommodationist stance—avoiding direct calls for insurrection—highlighted the defensive posture of counterrevolutionary anti-fascism, which prioritized over mobilization, enabling 's entrenchment amid economic concessions to conservatives via the 1927 Charter of Labour. This early phase yielded limited success, as fascist adaptability co-opted conservative support, but laid groundwork for broader anti-fascist coalitions in the 1940s by preserving liberal institutional memory.

Interwar Socialist and Anarchist Opposition

In Italy, socialist, communist, and anarchist militants formed the in late June 1921 as a organization to counter fascist squadristi violence following . Comprising former shock troops, trade unionists, and political radicals, the group numbered up to 20,000 members at its peak and successfully repelled fascist attacks in cities like and through armed defense of working-class neighborhoods. However, the (PSI) and nascent (PCI) leadership undermined the effort by withdrawing organizational support in favor of non-violent strategies, leaving anarchist and independent elements isolated and contributing to the fascists' consolidation of power by 1922. In , the (KPD) established the (Red Front Fighters League) in 1924 as a proletarian defense formation that engaged in frequent street clashes with Nazi (SA) units from the mid-1920s onward, despite a government ban in 1927. Social Democrats, through the formed in December 1931, mobilized over three million members—including workers' organizations and youth groups—against both and communism, employing the three-arrows symbol to signify opposition to reaction, fascism, and civil war while emphasizing defense of the . Anarchist involvement persisted in both countries, with Italian anarchists integrating into Arditi del Popolo squads and maintaining underground networks against Mussolini's regime into the mid-1920s, while German anarchists collaborated sporadically with communists in sabotage and anti-Nazi actions but lacked large-scale formations. Ideological fractures—such as the KPD's denunciation of Social Democrats as "social fascists" and mutual hostilities between communists and anarchists—prevented broader coalitions, enabling fascist electoral gains and the erosion of republican institutions by 1933.

Major Pre-WWII Episodes

Italy: Resistance to Mussolini

Opposition to Benito Mussolini's fascist movement emerged amid post- turmoil, particularly during the of 1919-1920, when socialist-led strikes and factory occupations by workers clashed with emerging fascist squads targeting left-wing groups in rural and urban areas. These Blackshirt units, often aided by landowners and elements of the Royal Italian Army, inflicted heavy violence on socialists and communists, killing dozens in ambushes and raids by mid-1921. In response, the formed on July 6, 1921, as a militant anti-fascist organization drawing from veterans, anarchists, republicans, socialists, and communists, organizing self-defense squads that numbered in the thousands and repelled fascist advances in cities like during August 1922 barricade fights. Internal fractures undermined these efforts; the , founded January 21, 1921, from a split in the Socialist Party, followed Comintern instructions to abandon unified fronts, withdrawing members to create separate proletarian defense groups, which fragmented resistance and allowed fascists to gain ground leading to the in October 1922. persisted briefly after the April 6, 1924, , marred by fascist intimidation and ballot stuffing that secured Mussolini's 65% of votes; Socialist deputy Giacomo Matteotti's June 30 speech denouncing the fraud prompted his kidnapping and murder by fascists on October 10, 1924, sparking the Aventine Secession where approximately 100 anti-fascist deputies withdrew from parliament on June 27, 1924, to protest violence and demand Mussolini's ouster, though King refused intervention. Mussolini's January 3, 1925, speech assuming full responsibility for squadrismo violence and enacting dictatorial laws, including the November 1926 exceptional decrees dissolving opposition parties and exiling or imprisoning leaders, drove resistance underground or abroad. The operated clandestinely with small cells, enduring mass arrests like the 1927 trials of 2,000 members, while exiled liberals and socialists formed in in 1929 under , publishing manifestos like the Quaderni di Giustizia e Libertà and coordinating limited and networks inside until Rosselli's assassination on June 9, 1937, by French far-right Cagoulards acting on fascist orders. These pre-war efforts, hampered by disunity and state repression, laid groundwork for later partisan warfare but failed to dislodge the regime before 1939.

Germany: Antagonism Toward Nazism

![Red Front Fighters League demonstration in Berlin, 1928][float-right] In the Weimar Republic, antagonism toward the emerging Nazi movement manifested primarily through violent confrontations between paramilitary organizations affiliated with left-wing parties and the Nazi Party's Sturmabteilung (SA). The Communist Party of Germany (KPD) organized the Roter Frontkämpferbund (RFB), established in July 1924, as its street-fighting arm to counter fascist threats and protect communist gatherings. The RFB frequently clashed with SA units in urban areas, particularly Berlin, where economic distress fueled competition for working-class support; these brawls escalated after the 1929 crash, contributing to hundreds of political deaths annually by the early 1930s. The Social Democratic Party (SPD), Germany's largest parliamentary force, mobilized the , formed in 1924, and later the in 1931 to oppose Nazi rallies and propaganda. The 's three-arrows symbol denoted resistance against , reactionary monarchism, and Marxist communism, organizing mass demonstrations like the 1932 Berlin protests against NSDAP gains. Despite these efforts, deep ideological rifts—exemplified by the KPD's Comintern-directed "social fascism" doctrine, which prioritized combating the SPD over uniting against Nazis—prevented a cohesive anti-Nazi front, as evidenced by the KPD's 1932 initiative that excluded social democrats. Electoral data underscores the context: the NSDAP's vote share surged from 2.6% in to 37.3% in July 1932, amid that intimidated opponents but failed to halt Nazi momentum due to fragmented resistance. Post-1933 of power, both KPD and SPD were banned—the KPD on March 6 and SPD effectively by June—shifting opposition underground, though pre- antagonism remained confined to localized, often counterproductive skirmishes rather than strategic alliances capable of leveraging the left's combined 34% vote in 1932.

Spain: Civil War Against Nationalists

The Spanish Civil War erupted on July 17, 1936, when elements of the Spanish Army, including generals like Francisco Franco, Emilio Mola, and José Sanjurjo, launched a coup against the Second Spanish Republic, which the rebels characterized as a defense against leftist chaos but which Republican forces and their allies portrayed as a fascist-backed insurrection. The Nationalists received substantial military support from Fascist Italy, which deployed up to 75,000 troops and provided aircraft and artillery, and from Nazi Germany, whose Condor Legion conducted bombing raids, including the infamous Guernica attack on April 26, 1937, that killed between 200 and 1,600 civilians. In response, Republican loyalists—comprising socialists of the PSOE and UGT, communists of the PCE, anarchists of the CNT-FAI, and the anti-Stalinist POUM—mobilized workers' militias to defend republican institutions and industrial centers, framing their resistance as a bulwark against fascism's expansion in Europe. In key regions like and , anarcho-syndicalist militias under the CNT-FAI played a pivotal role in suppressing the initial rebel garrisons; in , CNT fighters defeated the local military on July 19-20, 1936, leading to the formation of the Central Committee of Antifascist Militias of (CAMC) on July 21, which coordinated operations among CNT, FAI, UGT, and republican groups to organize supply lines, armories, and frontline columns. This committee exemplified early anti-fascist unity, controlling economic production through collectivization of factories and farms, though it dissolved by October 1936 amid pressures for centralized Republican authority. The , advocating workers' councils and opposing both and , contributed militias that fought effectively in until suppressed by communist-led forces in the of 1937, highlighting internal fractures where anti-fascist rhetoric masked power struggles between anarchists and Soviet-influenced communists. To bolster defenses, the Republican government, with Comintern assistance, recruited the starting in October 1936, drawing approximately 35,000 volunteers from over 50 countries, motivated primarily by anti-fascist solidarity rather than ideological uniformity, though many were communists or socialists. These brigades, including the Abraham Lincoln Battalion with American volunteers, helped repel Nationalist assaults at the Battle of in November 1936 and the Jarama River in February 1937, sustaining heavy casualties—estimated at 10,000 dead—while symbolizing global opposition to Axis intervention. Soviet aid, including 648 aircraft and 347 tanks delivered by 1937, provided crucial materiel, though non-intervention policies by Britain and limited Republican resources, contributing to strategic disadvantages. Despite initial successes, such as the Loyalist victory at the from July to November 1938 involving 80,000 troops, Republican disunity, superior Nationalist coordination, and overwhelming foreign support for Franco—totaling over 100,000 Italian and German personnel—led to the fall of on March 28, 1939, and Franco's victory on April 1. The anti-fascist framing persisted in exile narratives and Allied propaganda during , yet the Republican cause's defeat underscored the limitations of decentralized militias against a unified authoritarian front, with estimates of 500,000 total deaths, including atrocities on both sides, complicating postwar interpretations of the conflict as purely anti-fascist.

Other European Contexts

In the , anti-fascist efforts centered on disrupting the activities of Oswald Mosley's (BUF), which peaked at around 50,000 members in 1934 before declining amid public backlash. The pivotal event was the on October 4, 1936, when approximately 100,000 to 300,000 opponents—including Irish dockworkers, Jewish residents, communists from the Independent Labour Party, and anarchists—physically blocked a BUF march of 3,000 to 6,000 uniformed supporters through London's Jewish East End, erecting barricades and clashing with police who numbered over 6,000. The , John Simon, banned the march under emergency powers, preventing Mosley from reaching his destination and exposing the BUF's limited appeal; this humiliation accelerated the group's electoral failures and prompted the Public Order Act 1936, which outlawed political uniforms and gave authorities discretion to reroute marches deemed provocative. While the BUF persisted until its wartime internment in 1940, the episode demonstrated how mass mobilization and direct confrontation could marginalize fascist street presence without relying solely on legal or electoral means. In , opposition to perceived fascist leagues like the —led by Colonel François de La Rocque and swelling to an estimated 500,000 adherents by through veteran networks and anti-communist appeals—intensified after the Stavisky scandal and economic unrest. Right-wing demonstrations, including the violent clashes of February 6, 1934, in where leagues numbering tens of thousands assaulted the , galvanized leftist responses; communists, socialists, and trade unions formed vigilance committees and staged counter-riots, framing the leagues as proto-fascist threats akin to Mussolini's squads. This polarization contributed to the alliance of socialists, communists, and radicals, which secured a parliamentary majority in the May 1936 elections with 57% of the vote, enacting reforms like the Matignon Accords for workers' rights and dissolving groups, including the , which reemerged as the more moderate Parti Social Français. Historians debate the leagues' fascist credentials, noting their rejection of and emphasis on hierarchical nationalism over revolutionary violence, yet contemporaries' fears drove sustained street-level resistance that curbed their momentum. Elsewhere, anti-fascist actions manifested in localized confrontations, such as in the where militants from socialist and communist circles blockaded National Socialist Movement rallies led by , whose party garnered 7.9% in the 1935 elections; these efforts, including mass disruptions in and from 1933 onward, limited fascist visibility without toppling the movement, which was later suppressed post-1940 invasion. In , the Social Democratic Schutzbund paramilitaries fought a brief in February 1934 against the and government forces establishing an authoritarian clerical-fascist state under , resulting in over 1,000 deaths and the socialists' defeat but highlighting early armed pushback against corporatist authoritarianism before the 1938 . These episodes underscored a pattern of coalition-based disruption across borders, often blending ideological opposition with community defense, though outcomes varied with state tolerance for fascist growth.

World War II and Immediate Post-War Period

Allied and Partisan Efforts

The Allied powers waged conventional military campaigns against and as core components of their strategy to defeat the Axis alliance. The invasion of commenced on July 10, 1943, involving over 160,000 British, American, and Canadian troops, which precipitated the Fascist Grand Council's vote of no confidence in on July 24-25, 1943, resulting in his arrest. Following the Italian armistice announced on September 8, 1943, Allied forces landed at on September 9, initiating the mainland Italian campaign that progressed slowly against entrenched German defenses, culminating in the liberation of on June 4, 1944. These operations directly dismantled fascist control in and weakened Nazi occupation forces across . In tandem with Allied advances, partisan resistance movements conducted in Axis-occupied territories, disrupting supply lines and pinning down enemy divisions. In , anti-fascist partisans, supported by the U.S. (OSS), engaged in sabotage, intelligence gathering, and ambushes from onward, effectively immobilizing up to seven German divisions that might otherwise have reinforced other fronts. These fighters operated in diverse formations, including communist-led brigades, and contributed to the capture and execution of Mussolini by communist s on April 28, 1945, near . French Maquis groups, rural-based resisters who evaded forced labor deportations, escalated activities in 1943-1944, executing rail demolitions and attacks that delayed German reinforcements to following the Allied landings on June 6, 1944. In , communist-led partisans under established liberated zones and convened the Anti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of in , expanding to conduct offensives that tied down substantial Axis troops, facilitating broader Allied strategic gains. These efforts, while ideologically varied and often communist-influenced, inflicted measurable attrition on fascist and Nazi forces, complementing conventional Allied assaults through asymmetric tactics.

Denazification and Trials

Denazification was an Allied policy initiated in 1945 to eradicate Nazi ideology from German and Austrian society, , press, , , and following the defeat of . The process involved systematic screening via mandatory questionnaires (Fragebogen) that required individuals to detail their Nazi affiliations, followed by classification into categories ranging from major offenders to exonerated persons, with tribunals imposing penalties such as job loss, fines, or imprisonment for active participants. In the Western zones, it targeted removal of Nazis from public positions, purging libraries of propaganda, banning swastikas and Nazi emblems, and re-educating the population through exposure to Nazi atrocities, though implementation varied by zone—Soviet efforts emphasized punitive measures to install communist structures alongside anti-Nazi purges. By , over 8.5 million Germans had been screened in the U.S. zone alone, leading to the dismissal of approximately 25% of municipal employees in cities like , but the program's rigor waned by 1948 amid priorities, allowing some former Nazis reintegration into and government. This effort aligned with broader anti-fascist objectives by aiming to dismantle the institutional remnants of , though critics noted its incomplete success in fully confronting collective due to practical and political constraints. The Nuremberg trials formed a cornerstone of post-war anti-fascist justice, with the International Military Tribunal (IMT) convening from November 20, 1945, to October 1, 1946, to prosecute 24 high-ranking Nazi leaders (two tried in absentia, one deceased pre-trial) for crimes against peace, war crimes, , and conspiracy. The tribunal, comprising judges from the U.S., U.K., , and , convicted 19 defendants: 12 received death sentences (11 executed by hanging on October 16, 1946, including , , and , while committed suicide), three , four lesser terms, and three acquittals. These proceedings established legal precedents like individual accountability for aggressive war and , directly countering fascist ideologies of racial supremacy and by publicly documenting atrocities such as , which killed six million Jews. Subsequent Nuremberg Military Tribunals, conducted by the U.S. from December 1946 to April 1949, extended this anti-fascist reckoning across 12 proceedings against 185 defendants, including SS officers, physicians, judges, industrialists, and military leaders, for specific war crimes like medical experiments and forced labor. Outcomes included 142 convictions, with 25 death sentences (24 executed), 86 imprisonments, and one life term, targeting networks that sustained Nazi operations, such as the Einsatzgruppen mobile killing units responsible for over one million murders. While these trials reinforced denazification by disqualifying perpetrators from post-war roles and deterring fascist resurgence, their focus on high-level actors left lower-tier Nazis often unprosecuted, contributing to uneven ideological purge amid emerging East-West tensions.

Continuations in Europe (Italy, Germany, Greece)

In Italy, the anti-fascist legacy shaped the post-war republic's foundations, with the 1948 Constitution embedding principles derived from partisan resistance, such as the rejection of totalitarian reorganization under Article 139 and emphasis on democratic pluralism. However, immediate continuations were marked by tensions between anti-fascist ideals and pragmatic politics; the (PCI), a major force in the resistance, held significant influence in the (CLN), yet Justice Minister Palmiro Togliatti's 1946 decree pardoned thousands of former fascists and , prioritizing national reconciliation over punitive justice amid fears of civil unrest. This , affecting an estimated 50,000 individuals by 1947, drew sharp rebuke from purist anti-fascists who viewed it as leniency toward collaborators, exacerbating ambivalence in the republic's anti-fascist identity where increasingly framed former fascists as lesser threats compared to Soviet-aligned leftism. Neo-fascist groups emerged, notably the (MSI) founded on December 26, 1946, by ex-members of Mussolini's , which garnered 6.1% of the vote in the 1948 elections despite anti-fascist mobilization by PCI-led coalitions and Catholic centrists. Anti-fascist responses in Italy persisted through and ; former partisans formed vigilante committees in northern cities like and in 1945-1946, executing or assaulting suspected fascists in extrajudicial actions before Allied and government intervention curbed them, with over 100 such incidents documented in the alone. By the 1950s, as dynamics sidelined radical anti-fascism, PCI-affiliated groups monitored MSI activities, framing electoral gains by the latter—such as 4.8% in 1953—as fascist resurgence, though empirical data on violence remained limited compared to interwar , reflecting institutional stabilization under Christian Democratic dominance. In , post-war anti-fascism manifested through grassroots monitoring and legal challenges against neo-Nazi formations amid efforts that screened over 8 million individuals by 1948, purging about 500,000 from public roles but facing backlash for incomplete enforcement. The (SRP), founded in 1949 and drawing on ex-SS networks, advocated and achieved 11% in elections in 1951, prompting anti-fascist coalitions of Social Democrats (SPD) and trade unions to organize protests and petitions that contributed to the SRP's federal ban by the on October 23, 1952, under Article 21 for endangering democracy. Left-wing groups, including revived SPD youth wings, conducted street surveillance and public campaigns against "fascist remnants," with incidents like the 1952 rally clashes highlighting militant tactics, though state authorities increasingly channeled responses through judiciary rather than extralegal action. In the German Democratic Republic (GDR), anti-fascism served as state ideology under the Socialist Unity Party (), which from 1949 portrayed the regime as the true heir to Weimar-era resistance, enacting laws like the 1950 prohibition of Nazi symbols and integrating former anti-fascists into security apparatus to suppress dissent framed as "fascist provocation." This official narrative, disseminated through and media, claimed to eradicate fascism's roots via collectivization, yet empirical records reveal selective application, with minimal neo-fascist activity due to repression and division, while SED critics noted its use to justify Stalinist purges, as in the 1953 uprising where protesters were labeled "fascist agents." In , anti-fascist continuations transitioned into the Greek Civil War (1946-1949), where the communist-led (DSE), successor to the National Liberation Front (EAM) and partisans who had fought Axis occupation, positioned their insurgency as purging fascist collaborators embedded in the British-backed government. EAM's post-liberation purges in 1944-1945 targeted over 50,000 alleged collaborators through "people's courts," executing around 2,000-3,000 in what communists termed anti-fascist justice, though non-communist observers documented excesses including monarchist and liberal victims. The , peaking at 20,000-25,000 fighters by 1948, received Yugoslav aid until Tito's 1948 split, framing government forces as "monarcho-fascist" despite the latter's inclusion of former resistance elements; defeat came via U.S. support, with 158,000 Greek casualties overall and mass relocations of 700,000 civilians to counter guerrilla bases. Post-1949, suppressed communist networks maintained underground anti-fascist rhetoric against perceived right-wing authoritarianism under Prime Minister , though state amnesty in 1950 integrated some ex-DSE fighters, mirroring Italy's tensions.

Post-WWII to Late 20th Century Evolution

Cold War Influences

During the , anti-fascist narratives diverged sharply between the and the West, reflecting ideological competition rather than unified opposition to fascism's remnants. In the , communist regimes co-opted anti-fascism as a legitimizing , portraying their governance as the direct continuation of wartime resistance against while suppressing internal dissent under the guise of combating "fascist" elements. For instance, the repurposed anti-fascist organizations like the , which had raised funds during , into targets of postwar purges; by 1952, its leaders faced show trials and executions as alleged "cosmopolitans" and Zionist conspirators, illustrating how anti-fascist credentials were weaponized against perceived threats to Stalinist control. This approach extended to , where ’s 1947 doctrine framed global politics as a bipolar struggle between a "democratic anti-fascist" camp led by the USSR and an "imperialist" camp equated with fascism's resurgence, thereby justifying Soviet expansion as eternal vigilance against . Western anti-fascism, by contrast, integrated into anti-totalitarian frameworks that equated Soviet with as twin threats to , leading to the sidelining of leftist groups with strong anti-fascist histories if they exhibited pro-communist sympathies. In the United States, postwar efforts initially tracked both fascist and communist activities, but McCarthy-era policies from 1950 onward prioritized , often associating radical anti-fascists with subversion; for example, veterans of the Spanish International Brigades, who had fought Franco's fascists, faced and deportation if linked to communist networks, despite their anti-Nazi records. European resistance survivor organizations similarly fractured along lines, with East-West splits hindering collaborative anti-fascist commemorations; prominent Jewish and partisan groups maintained an "antifascist" identity in memory work but competed in narratives that accused rivals of rehabilitating ex-fascists, as seen in divided international congresses from the late 1940s. This polarization diluted unified efforts against neo-fascist revivals, such as in , where waned amid alliance-building against the USSR. Soviet propaganda further eroded anti-fascism's universality by broadly applying "fascist" labels to Western policies, from formation in 1949 to conflicts, framing itself as fascist's root cause and thereby alienating potential non-communist allies. In domestic contexts like the , the early exacerbated divisions within anti-fascist coalitions, splitting socialist and communist parties into phases of cooperation against lingering Nazi sympathizers (pre-1950) and mutual recriminations thereafter, as overshadowed shared anti-fascist goals. These influences entrenched anti-fascism as a contested terrain, where empirical opposition to fascist ideologies yielded to geopolitical realignments, setting precedents for later militant revivals detached from wartime consensus.

1970s-1990s Revival Against Neo-Fascism

In the , Europe experienced a perceived resurgence of and far-right groups amid , high , and debates over , which these organizations exploited to gain visibility. In the , the National Front (NF) saw its membership peak at around 17,500 in 1977 and polled over 200,000 votes in local elections that year, prompting organized opposition from left-wing and anti-racist activists who viewed the NF as a continuation of interwar fascist threats. Similar dynamics unfolded in , where the (MSI), a neo-fascist party, maintained parliamentary representation and influenced radical youth groups amid the "Years of Lead" period of political violence from the late 1960s to the 1980s. In , neo-Nazi activities, including violence and support for parties like the NPD, fueled concerns over fascist revival, though these remained marginal electorally. The United Kingdom's response crystallized through cultural and mass-mobilization efforts led primarily by the Socialist Workers Party (SWP). (RAR), launched in November 1976 following provocative statements by musicians like and that appeared sympathetic to fascist ideas, organized punk and concerts to promote multiracial unity and counter NF recruitment among youth. RAR's campaigns culminated in large events, such as the April 1978 carnival in London's Victoria Park attended by over 100,000 people, featuring bands like and , which integrated anti-fascist messaging with to undermine the far-right's cultural appeal. Complementing this, the (ANL), formed in November 1977 by the SWP alongside trade unions and community groups, built a broad coalition emphasizing non-electoral tactics like street protests and leafleting; by 1979, it had established around 250 branches, distributed 9 million leaflets, and sold 750,000 badges, contributing to the NF's electoral collapse in the 1979 general election where it garnered under 2% nationally. Key confrontations, such as the August 1977 clash in where thousands of anti-fascists outnumbered and disrupted an NF march, exemplified the strategy of direct physical opposition to deny neo-fascists unchallenged public space. In , anti-fascist activity in the and drew from communist "K-groups" and evolved into the autonomist (Autonomen) movement, rooted in squatter scenes and anarchist networks that rejected parliamentary politics in favor of militant . From the late , these groups monitored neo-Nazi gatherings and employed "" tactics—anonymous, masked formations—to disrupt events, including violent interventions against attacks and NPD rallies during the economic unrest. The Autonomen's efforts intensified in response to xenophobic incidents, such as attacks on immigrant housing, helping to limit neo-fascist street presence through sustained harassment and against far-right venues. By the , following , Antifa networks expanded to counter surging neo-Nazi violence, with over 1,000 attacks on foreigners recorded in 1992 alone, leading to coordinated blockades and international solidarity actions. Italy's anti-fascist revival involved extra-parliamentary left groups, including autonomists and militants, clashing with MSI-affiliated youth and radical neo-fascist cells amid the Years of Lead, where neo-fascists were implicated in over 90% of right-wing terrorist bombings, such as the 1980 station attack killing 85. Anti-fascist responses included street battles, like the February 1977 clashes between leftists and neo-fascists, and broader campaigns against MSI electoral gains, which peaked at 8.7% in 1972 before declining. In the , as the MSI rebranded into the National Alliance, anti-fascist groups focused on exposing continuities with Mussolini-era ideology, though violence persisted on both sides. Across , these movements waned by the late as neo-fascist groups fragmented or moderated, but laid groundwork for later networks by emphasizing proactive confrontation over passive opposition.

Contemporary Developments (2000s-Present)

Emergence of Modern Antifa Networks

The modern Antifa networks in the United States emerged from earlier anti-racist efforts, particularly the Anti-Racist Action (ARA) groups formed in the 1980s to confront neo-Nazi skinheads and white supremacist gatherings through direct action. By the early 2000s, these efforts evolved into more explicitly labeled "Antifa" formations, characterized by decentralized, autonomous cells emphasizing militant opposition to perceived fascist or authoritarian threats, often drawing from anarchist and autonomist traditions. The oldest U.S. group adopting the "Antifa" moniker was Rose City Antifa, established in October 2007 in Portland, Oregon, by former ARA activists responding to local neo-Nazi activities and broader far-right mobilizations. These networks expanded through informal affiliations rather than hierarchical structures, with ARA's formal disbandment in the early giving way to the Antifa Network in , which facilitated coordination across cities for doxxing, disruptions, and physical confrontations against targeted individuals and events. In , parallel developments occurred, building on post-1970s Antifa groups in and that opposed neo-Nazi resurgence; post-2000, these included expanded chapters in , which by the mid-2000s integrated online mobilization and transnational solidarity against groups like the . The use of tactics and encrypted communications became hallmarks, enabling rapid response to far-right demonstrations, as seen in coordinated actions during the protests. By the late 2000s and early 2010s, modern Antifa networks had solidified as a loose ideological constellation, prioritizing preemptive disruption over institutional advocacy, with membership often overlapping with broader anarchist scenes and anti-globalization movements. This emergence reflected a strategic shift toward viewing fascism not merely as historical ideology but as embedded in contemporary institutions and figures, prompting networks to target events ranging from patriot rallies to political speeches. While proponents, such as historian Mark Bray, frame this as defensive necessity against rising extremism, critics from law enforcement assessments highlight the networks' opacity and occasional escalation to violence as enabling unchecked vigilantism.

Key Events: Charlottesville (2017) and 2020 Protests

The took place in , on August 11–12, 2017, organized by figures including to oppose the planned removal of a statue of Confederate general and to unite various white nationalist, alt-right, and neo-Nazi groups. Counter-protests drew hundreds, including members of antifa networks who arrived equipped with shields, clubs, and , initiating physical clashes with rally participants as early as the evening of August 11 during a torch-lit march on the campus. These confrontations involved mutual , with antifa activists employing militant tactics justified by some participants as necessary to disrupt perceived fascist gatherings through direct opposition. Violence intensified on when brawls broke out between the opposing groups near the rally site, resulting in multiple injuries before the event was declared unlawful by authorities. A was declared amid the chaos, during which James Alex Fields Jr., a rally attendee with white supremacist affiliations, drove his car into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing Heather Heyer and injuring 19 others. Overall, the weekend saw one fatality, dozens of injuries from beatings and chemical agents, and at least 36 arrests, with both sides contributing to the disorder though antifa's preemptive confrontations were cited by rally organizers as provocation. The events amplified antifa's visibility in the , framing their actions as resistance to rising right-wing extremism, while critics highlighted the group's role in escalating street-level violence. Following the death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, in , nationwide protests erupted against police brutality, with antifa-affiliated individuals participating in many urban centers, particularly in , where demonstrations persisted for over 100 consecutive nights into 2021. While federal investigations found no evidence of a centralized antifa conspiracy orchestrating the unrest, localized antifa activity included coordinated efforts to shield rioters, deploy projectiles at , and vandalize federal buildings, contributing to widespread , , and assaults that caused an estimated $1–2 billion in insured property damage across U.S. cities. In Portland, antifa groups targeted the Mark O. Hatfield Federal Courthouse with lasers, fireworks, and barricades, prompting federal interventions under Operation Diligent Valor, which resulted in over 100 arrests for crimes including assault on officers and civil disorder. By September 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice had charged over 300 individuals federally for -related felonies such as , explosives use, and interstate riot travel, though explicit antifa designations were rare in indictments due to the movement's decentralized structure; nonetheless, self-identified antifa actors faced state and local prosecutions for roles in violent episodes, including the fatal of a Trump supporter by an antifa-linked individual in Portland on August 29, 2020. These events drew scrutiny to antifa's tactical embrace of "black bloc" anonymity and property destruction as tools against systemic , contrasted by law enforcement reports emphasizing opportunistic over ideological coordination. The unrest highlighted tensions over antifa's boundary between and militancy, with Department of assessments identifying "violent antifa-inspired" elements in gathered on demonstrators.

2020s Controversies and Responses

During the protests in 2020, anti-fascist groups, including Antifa affiliates, were accused of escalating peaceful demonstrations into riots involving , , and assaults on police and journalists, particularly in , where over 100 consecutive nights of unrest occurred from May to September. Federal assessments identified anarchist extremists, often aligned with Antifa ideology, as responsible for a significant portion of the , including attacks on federal buildings and the use of improvised explosives. Property damage nationwide from these events exceeded $1 billion, with Antifa-linked actors documented in incidents such as the burning of a Minneapolis police precinct and coordinated blockades in Seattle's Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone. Critics, including and conservative analysts, argued that Antifa's militant tactics blurred the line between anti-fascism and , citing Andy Ngo's reporting on organized assaults by black-clad activists wielding weapons like and clubs against perceived right-wing figures and bystanders. While mainstream outlets emphasized a lack of for top-down Antifa orchestration—pointing to federal arrests yielding few explicit ties—decentralized cells nonetheless claimed responsibility for disruptive actions under anti-fascist banners, fueling debates over ideological justification for against institutions labeled as fascist-enabling. In response, the U.S. government under President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order on September 22, 2025, designating Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. Congressional efforts, such as H.Res.26 introduced in January 2025, sought to formally deem Antifa conduct as , reflecting concerns over persistent low-level violence in subsequent years, including attacks on immigration enforcement operations. The Department of Homeland Security documented Antifa interference in arrests, with rioters attempting to obstruct deportations of criminals, prompting vows of aggressive enforcement. European responses mirrored U.S. actions amid rising Antifa clashes with right-wing parties like Germany's AfD, where 2022 reports detailed death threats and bomb-making instructions targeting politicians. Hungarian Prime Minister and other far-right leaders advocated EU-wide terrorist designations for Antifa following U.S. precedents, citing incidents like assaults on conservative events and doxxing campaigns as evidence of organized intimidation beyond mere . Critics of these measures, such as left-leaning think tanks, contended they risked stifling legitimate opposition, though empirical data on Antifa's role in sustained disruptions supported calls for accountability.

Tactics and Methodologies

Non-Violent Strategies

Electoral participation formed a core non-violent strategy in interwar Europe, where anti-fascist groups sought to counter rising fascist parties through democratic coalitions and voting blocs. In France, the Popular Front alliance of socialists, communists, and radicals secured a legislative majority in the 1936 elections, capturing approximately 57% of seats and enacting labor reforms, paid vacations, and the 40-hour workweek to address economic grievances that fueled fascist appeal. This united front temporarily marginalized fascist influences by prioritizing social welfare over ideological purity, though it dissolved amid internal divisions by 1938. In contrast, similar efforts in Germany faltered as the Social Democratic Party (SPD), despite campaigning against the Nazis, saw its vote share drop from 30.7% in July 1932 to 18.3% by November, enabling Hitler's chancellorship through coalition maneuvers rather than outright majority. Economic boycotts targeted fascist regimes' financial lifelines, aiming to impose costs without direct confrontation. Following the Nazi seizure of power in , Jewish organizations in the United States and Britain organized the Anti-Nazi , urging consumers to shun German exports like textiles and chemicals, which accounted for over 20% of Germany's foreign trade at the time. Proponents claimed it pressured the regime by highlighting international isolation, though Nazi countermeasures, including retaliatory boycotts of Jewish businesses on April 1, 1933, limited its impact and escalated domestic . Educational campaigns complemented these efforts, with anti-fascist intellectuals and labor groups distributing pamphlets and hosting lectures to debunk fascist propaganda, such as myths of national revival, emphasizing instead of authoritarianism's historical failures in suppressing dissent. Peaceful public demonstrations and networks sought to delegitimize fascist gatherings through mass presence and exposure. In Britain, anti-fascist committees in the 1930s monitored Oswald Mosley's (BUF), leaking financial ties to Italian funding and organizing counter-rallies that drew larger crowds, contributing to the BUF's electoral decline to under 1% by 1935. These tactics relied on legal protections for assembly and speech, fostering community resilience against ideological infiltration without resorting to physical disruption. In the United States, groups like the American League Against War and Fascism held non-violent protests, such as the February 1939 opposition to a pro-Nazi rally at , where 20,000 demonstrators outside highlighted fascist threats through speeches and signage, amplifying media coverage of opposition. Such strategies prioritized visibility and , though their efficacy waned against regimes that curtailed post-power consolidation.

Militant Direct Action

Militant within anti-fascism encompasses physical confrontations, property disruption, and preemptive interventions aimed at thwarting perceived fascist gatherings or efforts, distinguishing it from non-violent by prioritizing immediate neutralization over legal or rhetorical opposition. This approach traces to interwar , where groups employed street-level violence to counter rising authoritarian movements. In , the , formed in June 1921 by former and militants from socialist, communist, and anarchist backgrounds, engaged in armed clashes with Benito Mussolini's ; their inaugural action on July 19, 1921, in involved storming a fascist headquarters, expelling occupants, and resisting police intervention, while subsequent skirmishes in on and 23, 1921, resulted in injuries and arrests amid broader squadristi violence. Similarly, in Weimar Germany, the Communist Party-affiliated , established in 1932, organized paramilitary units for brawls against Nazi SA stormtroopers, fostering networks for and intelligence to disrupt rallies, though these efforts failed to halt the Nazi ascent amid fragmented left-wing unity. Post-World War II, militant anti-fascism revived in against neo-Nazi skinheads and nationalist groups, with tactics evolving toward coordinated disruptions. In the during the 1980s, (AFA), allied with groups like , conducted "working-class defense" operations, including invasions of far-right meetings and physical expulsions, as seen in their role in halting British National Front activities through direct street engagements. These methods emphasized anonymity and mobility, prefiguring contemporary practices. By the 1990s, autonomous collectives in and elsewhere adopted similar strategies against resurgent far-right violence, prioritizing "no platform" enforcement via force over state reliance, which militants viewed as complicit in tolerating . In the United States and since the , militant has centered on the tactic, where participants don black attire, masks, and shields to evade identification, enabling property vandalism—such as smashing windows of institutions linked to perceived fascist enablers—and physical clashes during counter-demonstrations. This includes improvised weapons like fireworks, clubs, and in confrontations, as documented in incidents where anti-fascist groups disrupted alt-right assemblies, resulting in mutual violence including stabbings and beatings; for instance, in Sacramento on June 26, 2016, anti-fascist militants stabbed multiple neo-Nazi attendees amid a brawl at the . Proponents justify these actions as defensive necessities against existential threats, arguing passivity enables fascist entrenchment, though empirical outcomes often involve escalated disorder without proportionally diminishing targeted ideologies. Additional elements include doxxing for social ostracism and de-arrests—physically freeing detained comrades—reinforcing operational resilience but raising concerns over tactical overreach in non-fascist contexts.

Criticisms and Controversies

Allegations of Violence and Extremism

Militant factions within contemporary anti-fascism, such as decentralized networks associated with Antifa, have faced allegations of employing violence as a primary tactic rather than solely as self-defense against fascist threats, including premeditated assaults, arson, and riots that target political opponents, journalists, and public infrastructure. In the United States, these claims intensified following incidents like the June 29, 2019, attack on journalist Andy Ngo in Portland, Oregon, where members of Rose City Antifa allegedly struck him with fists, kicks, and thrown objects including milkshakes mixed with cement-like substances, resulting in a subdural hematoma and brain hemorrhage requiring hospitalization. Ngo subsequently won a $300,000 civil judgment against the group in August 2023 for assault and emotional distress, with the court finding evidence of organized targeting. Critics, including law enforcement, contend such actions reflect an extremist ideology that justifies violence against perceived ideological enemies, blurring distinctions between anti-fascism and domestic terrorism. During the 2020 George Floyd protests, Antifa-affiliated individuals were implicated in widespread rioting across U.S. cities, contributing to an estimated $1-2 billion in insured —the highest from civil unrest in U.S. history—through , , and targeting businesses, police stations, and federal buildings. In Portland alone, over 100 nights of unrest from May to September 2020 involved Molotov cocktails thrown at officers, lasers aimed to blind police, and attacks on the Mark O. Hatfield Federal Courthouse, leading to federal charges against at least 100 rioters, many linked to anarchist or Antifa groups. These events resulted in approximately 25 deaths nationwide tied to the unrest, including shootings and vehicle rammings amid chaotic confrontations. Federal assessments, including from the Department of , highlighted Antifa's role in escalating peaceful demonstrations into sustained violence, prompting President Trump's September 22, 2025, designating Antifa as a domestic terrorist for its "militarist, anarchist enterprise" advocating overthrow of structures. In , similar allegations persist, with German authorities reporting a rise in Antifa-linked violence since the , including over 1,000 attacks annually on perceived right-wing targets by 2022, encompassing on vehicles, physical assaults on politicians, and death threats against civilians. In , anti-fascist demonstrators clashed violently with police in on May 17, 2025, during protests against a far-right "Remigration Summit," hurling projectiles and setting fires, which organizers framed as resistance but authorities described as unprovoked disrupting public order. Proponents of these tactics often invoke historical anti-fascist resistance to justify preemptive aggression, yet detractors argue this fosters a cycle of , where opposition to morphs into intolerance of , evidenced by doxxing campaigns and no-platforming that escalate to physical harm. While Antifa networks deny centralized orchestration, court records and intelligence reports substantiate patterns of coordinated militancy, raising concerns over their divergence from democratic norms toward authoritarian enforcement of ideological purity.

Ideological Overreach and Misapplication

Critics argue that anti-fascism has periodically expanded the definition of beyond its core attributes—such as authoritarian , suppression of through , and corporatist economic control under a single-party —to encompass ideological opponents lacking these traits, thereby justifying confrontational tactics against non-fascist targets. This overreach, they contend, dilutes the term's precision and enables purist applications that hinder broader coalitions against genuine authoritarian threats. A prominent historical instance occurred in the late 1920s when the (Comintern), directed by , promulgated the "social fascism" thesis, equating social democratic parties with fascism's moderate variant. From 1928 to 1935, the (KPD) refused alliances with the Social Democratic Party (SPD), labeling the latter "social fascists" for their parliamentary participation and reforms, despite the SPD's opposition to Nazi paramilitarism. This doctrinal rigidity fragmented the German left, contributing to Adolf Hitler's appointment as chancellor on January 30, 1933, as unified resistance faltered; the KPD's 16.9% vote share in November 1932 elections proved insufficient without SPD cooperation, which commanded 20.4%. Historians attribute part of the Nazis' electoral breakthrough to this misapplication, which prioritized ideological purity over pragmatic anti-authoritarian unity. In contemporary contexts, particularly since the , militant anti-fascist groups have applied the label expansively to include , border enforcement, and conservative electoral politics, targets that diverge from fascism's statist and ultranationalist hallmarks. For instance, some antifa networks equate private enterprise with fascist enablers, issuing threats against businesses perceived as complicit in "systemic ," despite capitalism's post-World War II global dominance correlating with democratic expansions rather than fascist resurgence. This broad framing rejects narrower historical definitions, allowing opposition to figures like —whose administration operated within constitutional checks, including 2020 election certification despite challenges—as inherently fascist, even absent evidence of one-party consolidation or total institutional capture. Such misapplications extend to deplatforming non-extremist conservatives, as seen in disruptions of speakers like or on U.S. campuses, where organizers invoked anti-fascist imperatives despite these individuals' advocacy for free-market policies and criticism of , not authoritarian . Critics, including security analysts, note that antifa's decentralized nature exacerbates this by permitting subjective identifications of "fascism," potentially encompassing liberal democratic norms like debate on , thus alienating potential allies and mirroring the interwar left's self-defeating divisions. Empirical assessments suggest this overreach has not demonstrably curbed authoritarian tendencies but has instead polarized discourse, with events like the —costing $100,000 in damages—illustrating tactics applied to provocateurs rather than verified fascists.

Authoritarian Parallels and Free Speech Concerns

Critics of anti-fascism movements, particularly modern Antifa networks, have drawn parallels to authoritarian tactics, noting the use of masked groups employing physical intimidation and violence to silence perceived ideological enemies, akin to the Nazi (SA) Brownshirts in 1920s-1930s , who disrupted opponents' gatherings through street brawls and property destruction to assert dominance. This comparison arises from documented instances where Antifa affiliates prioritize direct confrontation over institutional channels, fostering an environment where dissent is met with force rather than debate, thereby mirroring the extra-legal enforcement seen in early fascist mobilizations. A core tenet of Antifa ideology involves rejecting unrestricted free speech, encapsulated in the "no platform" , which holds that granting visibility to figures or ideas deemed fascist—regardless of legal protections—facilitates their normalization and thus warrants preemptive shutdowns through disruption or violence. Antifa proponent Mark Bray has articulated this view, arguing that historical lessons from fascism's rise justify denying platforms to such speech, even if it means overriding democratic norms of open expression. This approach has manifested in events like the February 1, 2017, cancellation of Milo Yiannopoulos's speech at the , where Antifa-linked protesters ignited fires, vandalized property causing over $100,000 in damages, and clashed with police, forcing the event's termination amid safety concerns. Such tactics raise free speech alarms by substituting subjective ideological judgments for rule-of-law adjudication, potentially eroding First Amendment principles in the U.S. and analogous protections elsewhere, as disruptions extend beyond campuses to public forums. In , from 2017 onward, Antifa groups repeatedly targeted conservative speakers, journalists, and federal facilities with assaults and blockades—exemplified by over 100 nights of riots in 2020 involving Molotov cocktails and attacks on media personnel—creating de facto no-go zones that prioritize activist control over public access and discourse. Federal assessments, including from the Department of Homeland Security, have classified certain Antifa activities as domestic terrorist threats due to their organized use of violence to intimidate and coerce, underscoring how these methods undermine liberal democratic tolerance by enforcing conformity through fear. While Antifa frames these actions as defensive against existential threats, empirical patterns of selective application—sparing left-leaning critics while targeting a broad spectrum of conservatives—reveal inconsistencies that align more with partisan than principled anti-fascism.

Ideological and Strategic Debates

Distinctions from Liberal or Conservative Anti-Fascism

Radical anti-fascism, as embodied by groups like Antifa, fundamentally diverges from liberal anti-fascism in its rejection of democratic pluralism and reliance on extra-institutional tactics. While liberal anti-fascism operates within constitutional frameworks—employing electoral politics, judicial remedies, and public discourse to marginalize fascist ideologies—radical variants view itself as structurally enabling through its tolerance of "hate speech" and capitalist inequalities. For instance, Antifa adherents often advocate "no platforming" fascists via physical disruption or , arguing that free speech protections under inadvertently amplify authoritarian threats, a stance that contrasts with liberals' commitment to defending even abhorrent views short of direct incitement to violence. This tactical divergence was evident in responses to events like the 2017 Charlottesville rally, where liberals condemned white nationalists through institutional channels, whereas Antifa engaged in street confrontations, prioritizing preemptive neutralization over legal processes. Conservative anti-fascism, historically rooted in opposition to fascism's revolutionary totalitarianism, emphasizes preservation of traditional institutions, national sovereignty, and anti-statist bulwarks against collectivist ideologies, setting it apart from radical anti-fascism's revolutionary egalitarianism. In interwar Britain, for example, the Conservative Party rejected fascist movements like Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists not merely as rivals but as antithetical to evolutionary constitutionalism, viewing Mussolini's and Hitler's regimes as disruptive upheavals akin to Bolshevism rather than extensions of ordered hierarchy. Unlike radical anti-fascists, who often frame conservatism itself as proto-fascist due to its defense of borders and hierarchies, conservatives historically allied with liberals against fascism— as in Winston Churchill's wartime coalition—while critiquing leftist anti-fascism for mirroring fascist suppression of dissent. Modern distinctions persist: conservatives oppose neo-fascist extremism through law enforcement and cultural critique, but reject radical anti-fascism's militant anarchism as a greater domestic threat, given its explicit aims to erode liberal democratic norms in pursuit of anti-capitalist restructuring. These distinctions underscore a core causal divide: liberal and conservative anti-fascism seek to fortify existing orders against totalitarian encroachment via adaptive , whereas radical anti-fascism posits those orders as complicit, necessitating their —a position empirically linked to heightened civil unrest without proportionate fascist decline, as seen in post-2016 U.S. protest dynamics where Antifa actions correlated with property damage exceeding $1 million in Portland alone by 2021, yet fascist group memberships remained marginal at under 0.01% of the population.

Relations to Broader Political Movements

Anti-fascism emerged in the early as a response to the rise of Mussolini's Fascist Party in , where initial opposition groups like the united communists, socialists, and anarchists in paramilitary squads to counter fascist squads. Similar formations arose in Germany, with the (KPD) launching in 1932 to combat Nazis, though internal left-wing divisions between communists and social democrats hampered unified action. These early efforts were deeply embedded in Marxist and anarchist ideologies, viewing as an extension of capitalist crisis rather than a standalone threat, which shaped anti-fascist strategies around class struggle and direct confrontation. The (Comintern) formalized anti-fascism as a transnational strategy from , directing socialist and communist parties to articulate resistance against emerging fascist regimes, though implementation often prioritized ideological purity over broad alliances until the policy. In during the 1936-1939 , anti-fascist forces aligned under the Republican banner encompassed anarchists, communists, and socialists, but Stalinist influence led to suppression of rival left factions, illustrating how anti-fascism served as a framework for consolidating Marxist-Leninist power. Post-World War II, communist regimes in invoked anti-fascist credentials to legitimize their rule, framing opposition as fascist revival while establishing one-party states. Contemporary anti-fascist movements, particularly those self-identifying as Antifa, maintain ties to far-left ideologies including , , and , operating as decentralized networks that extend opposition beyond to state institutions, , and perceived . These groups intersect with broader left-wing mobilizations such as anti-globalization protests and environmental direct actions, sharing tactics like anonymity and property disruption, though they remain distinct from electoral socialist parties or liberal democrats by rejecting in favor of prefigurative . In the United States, Antifa activism has overlapped with movements like in opposing far-right rallies, but empirical analyses indicate limited integration into mainstream Democratic or progressive coalitions due to commitments to anti-capitalist militancy.

Impact and Assessment

Verified Achievements

Anti-fascist resistance during World War II produced limited but verifiable tactical outcomes in occupied Europe. Italian partisans, organized into groups totaling around 200,000 fighters by 1945, conducted that disrupted German supply lines and communications in . These efforts culminated in the partisan-led uprisings that liberated key cities including on April 25, 1945, and shortly thereafter, ahead of advancing Allied forces. On April 28, 1945, partisans intercepted and executed near , terminating the puppet state. In , Resistance networks supplied Allied intelligence services with data on German defenses, contributing to the planning of the Normandy invasion on June 6, 1944. operations targeted rail infrastructure, with acts such as the of trains carrying reinforcements delaying German responses to the landings by days in some sectors. However, these disruptions represented tactical interruptions rather than strategic shifts, as the broader defeat of Nazi forces stemmed primarily from conventional military campaigns. Yugoslav Partisans under controlled significant rural territories by 1943, forcing German divisions to divert resources for , thereby reducing Axis strength on other fronts. Empirical assessments indicate these forces tied down approximately 20 German divisions, equivalent to hindering operations elsewhere. Prewar anti-fascist actions, such as the 1936 in Britain, physically blocked a march, contributing to the marginalization of Oswald Mosley's movement and its failure to gain electoral traction. Postwar, anti-fascist vigilance in helped prosecute former Nazis through processes, with over 8.5 million individuals screened and thousands barred from public office by 1949. These measures prevented immediate fascist revival, though systemic challenges persisted. Modern iterations, such as self-described Antifa groups, lack documented instances of preempting fascist governance, with no of derailing authoritarian shifts in democratic contexts.

Empirical Failures and Unintended Effects

In the interwar period, anti-fascist movements frequently failed to halt the rise of fascist regimes despite widespread mobilization. In Germany, the Communist Party of Germany (KPD)'s strategy of treating social democrats as "social fascists" precluded a united front against the Nazis, contributing to the latter's consolidation of power after the 1933 elections, where the Nazi Party secured 43.9% of the vote. This sectarianism, directed by Soviet policy under Stalin, prioritized ideological purity over pragmatic alliances, allowing Adolf Hitler to dismantle democratic institutions unopposed by a fragmented left. Similarly, in Spain, the 1936 Popular Front victory led to electoral success but devolved into internal purges and anarchist-communist violence against perceived moderates, weakening resistance and enabling General Francisco Franco's Nationalists to prevail in the Civil War by 1939, resulting in over 500,000 deaths. Post-World War II, anti-fascist credentials were exploited by communist regimes in to legitimize authoritarian rule, an unintended consequence of equating opposition with fascist remnants. In countries like and , self-proclaimed anti-fascist national fronts, dominated by Soviet-backed parties, suppressed non-communist groups under the guise of purging collaborators, leading to one-party states by the late 1940s; for instance, in , the 1948 coup ousted the democratic government using anti-fascist , installing a regime that lasted until 1989. This pattern echoed earlier failures where anti-fascism blurred into , as militant tactics against perceived enemies eroded liberal norms without establishing stable democracies. In contemporary contexts, militant anti-fascist groups like Antifa have demonstrated limited success in curbing far-right growth, often exacerbating polarization and . Empirical assessments indicate that Antifa's direct confrontations, including destruction and during protests, have not empirically reduced far-right ; for example, between 2016 and 2020, U.S. Antifa-linked incidents correlated with heightened clashes, such as the 2017 Charlottesville rally melee, but far-right groups persisted and adapted, with the expanding membership amid narratives of victimhood. Data from the for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) documents over 100 Antifa-involved violent events from 2016 to 2021, yet no causal evidence links these actions to diminished fascist threats, while they fueled reciprocal on the right. Unintended effects include public backlash, with polls showing Antifa favorability below 40% among Americans by 2020, and legal repercussions, such as federal charges against participants in 2020 Portland riots for and , which strained resources without yielding strategic gains against extremism.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.