Hubbry Logo
Dualism in cosmologyDualism in cosmologyMain
Open search
Dualism in cosmology
Community hub
Dualism in cosmology
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Dualism in cosmology
Dualism in cosmology
Dualism in cosmology
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Theism
Types of faith
Specific conceptions
In particular religions
Abrahamic
Indo-Iranian
Chinese
Attributes
  • Experiences
  • Practices
Related topics

Dualism or dualistic cosmology is the moral or belief that two fundamental concepts exist, which often oppose each other. It is an umbrella term that covers a diversity of views from various religions, including both traditional religions and scriptural religions.

Moral dualism is the belief of the great complement of, or conflict between, the benevolent and the malevolent. It simply implies that there are two moral opposites at work, independent of any interpretation of what might be "moral" and independent of how these may be represented. Moral opposites might, for example, exist in a worldview that has one god, more than one god, or none. By contrast, duotheism, bitheism or ditheism implies (at least) two gods. While bitheism implies harmony, ditheism implies rivalry and opposition, such as between good and evil, or light and dark, or summer and winter. For example, a ditheistic system could be one in which one god is a creator and the other a destroyer. In theology, dualism can also refer to the relationship between the deity and creation or the deity and the universe (see theistic dualism). That form of dualism is a belief shared in certain traditions of Christianity and Hinduism.[1] Alternatively, in ontological dualism, the world is divided into two overarching categories. Within Chinese culture and philosophy the opposition and combination of the universe's two basic principles are expressed as yin and yang and are traditionally foundational doctrine of Taoism, Confucianism and some Chinese Buddhist Schools.

Many myths and creation motifs with dualistic cosmologies have been described in ethnographic and anthropological literature. The motifs conceive the world as being created, organized, or influenced by two demiurges, culture heroes, or other mythological beings, who compete with each other or have a complementary function in creating, arranging or influencing the world. There is a huge diversity of such cosmologies. In some cases, such as among the Chukchi, the beings collaborate rather than compete, and they contribute to the creation in a coequal way. In many other instances the two beings are not of the same importance or power (sometimes, one of them is even characterized as gullible). Sometimes they can be contrasted as good versus evil.[2] They may be often believed to be twins or at least brothers.[3][4] Dualistic motifs in mythologies can be observed in all inhabited continents. Zolotarjov concludes that they cannot be explained by diffusion or borrowing but are rather of convergent origin. They are related to a dualistic organization of society (moieties); in some cultures, the social organization may have ceased to exist, but mythology preserves the memory in more and more disguised ways.[5]

Moral dualism

[edit]

Moral dualism is the belief of the great complement or conflict between the benevolent and the malevolent. Like ditheism/bitheism (see below), moral dualism does not imply the absence of monist or monotheistic principles. Moral dualism simply implies that there are two moral opposites at work, independent of any interpretation of what might be "moral" and—unlike ditheism/bitheism—independent of how these may be represented.

For example, Mazdaism (Mazdean Zoroastrianism) is both dualistic and monotheistic (but not monist by definition) since in that philosophy God—the Creator—is purely good, and the antithesis—which is also uncreated—is an absolute one. Mandaeism is monotheistic and Gnostic and in its cosmology, the World of Light (alma d-nhūra) that is good, is contrasted with the World of Darkness or underworld (alma d-hšuka) that is evil.[6][7] Zurvanism (Zurvanite Zoroastrianism) and Manichaeism are representative of dualistic and monist philosophies since each has a supreme and transcendental First Principle from which the two equal-but-opposite entities then emanate. This is also true for the suppressed Christian gnostic religions, such as Bogomils, Catharism, and so on. More complex forms of monist dualism also exist, for instance in Hermeticism, where Nous "thought"—that is described to have created man—brings forth both good and evil, dependent on interpretation, whether it receives prompting from the God or from the Demon. Duality with pluralism is considered a logical fallacy.

History

[edit]

Moral dualism began as a theological belief. Dualism was first seen implicitly in Egyptian religious beliefs by the contrast of the gods Set (disorder, death) and Osiris (order, life).[8] The first explicit conception of dualism came from the Ancient Persian religion of Zoroastrianism around the mid-fifth century BC. Zoroastrianism is a monotheistic religion that believes that Ahura Mazda is the eternal creator of all good things. Any violations of Ahura Mazda's order arise from druj, which is everything uncreated. From this comes a significant choice for humans to make. Either they fully participate in human life for Ahura Mazda or they do not and give druj power. Personal dualism is even more distinct in the beliefs of later religions.

The religious dualism of Christianity between good and evil is not a perfect dualism as God (good) will inevitably destroy Satan (evil). Early Christian dualism is largely based on Platonic Dualism (See: Neoplatonism and Christianity). There is also a personal dualism in Christianity with a soul-body distinction based on the idea of an immaterial Christian soul.[9]

Duotheism, bitheism, ditheism

[edit]

When used with regards to multiple gods, dualism may refer to duotheism, bitheism, or ditheism. Although ditheism/bitheism imply moral dualism, they are not equivalent: ditheism/bitheism implies (at least) two gods, while moral dualism does not necessarily imply theism (theos = god) at all.

Both bitheism and ditheism imply a belief in two equally powerful gods with complementary or antonymous properties; however, while bitheism implies harmony, ditheism implies rivalry and opposition, such as between good and evil, bright and dark, or summer and winter. For example, a ditheistic system would be one in which one god is creative, the other is destructive (cf. theodicy). In the original conception of Zoroastrianism, for example, Ahura Mazda was the spirit of ultimate good, while Ahriman (Angra Mainyu) was the spirit of ultimate evil.

In a bitheistic system, by contrast, where the two deities are not in conflict or opposition, one could be male and the other female (cf. duotheism[clarification needed]). One well-known example of a bitheistic or duotheistic theology based on gender polarity is found in the neopagan religion of Wicca. In Wicca, dualism is represented in the belief of a god and a goddess as a dual partnership in ruling the universe. This is centered on the worship of a divine couple, the Moon Goddess and the Horned God, who are regarded as lovers. However, there is also a ditheistic theme within traditional Wicca, as the Horned God has dual aspects of bright and dark—relating to day/night, summer/winter—expressed as the Oak King and the Holly King, who in Wiccan myth and ritual are said to engage in battle twice a year for the hand of the Goddess, resulting in the changing seasons. (Within Wicca, bright and dark do not correspond to notions of "good" and "evil" but are aspects of the natural world, much like yin and yang in Taoism.)

Radical and mitigated dualism

[edit]
  • Radical Dualism – or absolute Dualism which posits two co-equal divine forces.[10] Manichaeism conceives of two previously coexistent realms of light and darkness which become embroiled in conflict, owing to the chaotic actions of the latter. Subsequently, certain elements of the light became entrapped within darkness; the purpose of material creation is to enact the slow process of extraction of these individual elements, at the end of which the kingdom of light will prevail over darkness. Manicheanism likely inherits this dualistic mythology from Zoroastrianism, in which the eternal spirit Ahura Mazda is opposed by his antithesis, Angra Mainyu; the two are engaged in a cosmic struggle, the conclusion of which will likewise see Ahura Mazda triumphant. The 'Hymn of the Pearl' included the belief that the material world corresponds to some sort of malevolent intoxication brought about by the powers of darkness to keep elements of the light trapped inside it in a state of drunken distraction.
  • Mitigated Dualism – is where one of the two principles is in some way inferior to the other. Such classical Gnostic movements as the Sethians conceived of the material world as being created by a lesser divinity than the true God that was the object of their devotion. The spiritual world is conceived of as being radically different from the material world, co-extensive with the true God, and the true home of certain enlightened members of humanity; thus, these systems were expressive of a feeling of acute alienation within the world, and their resultant aim was to allow the soul to escape the constraints presented by the physical realm.[10]

However, bitheistic and ditheistic principles are not always so easily contrastable, for instance in a system where one god is the representative of summer and drought and the other of winter and rain/fertility (cf. the mythology of Persephone). Marcionism, an early Christian sect, held that the Old and New Testaments were the work of two opposing gods: both were First Principles, but of different religions.[11]

Theistic dualism

[edit]

In theology, dualism can refer to the relationship between God and creation or God and the universe. This form of dualism is a belief shared in certain traditions of Christianity and Hinduism.[12][1]

Zoroastrianism

[edit]
Main article: Zoroastrianism

Zoroastrianism or "Mazdayasna" is one of the world's oldest continuously-practiced religions, based on the teachings of the Iranian-speaking prophet Zoroaster.[13][14] It has a dualistic cosmology of good and evil and an eschatology which predicts the ultimate conquest of evil by good.[15] Zoroastrianism exalts an uncreated and benevolent deity of wisdom known as Ahura Mazda (lit. 'Wise Lord') as its supreme being.[16]

Manichaeism

[edit]
Main article: Manichaeism

Manichaeism was a major religion[17] founded in the 3rd century AD by the Parthian[18] prophet Mani (c. 216 – c. 274 AD), in the Sasanian Empire.[19] Manichaeism taught an elaborate dualistic cosmology describing the struggle between a good, spiritual world of light, and an evil, material world of darkness.[20] Through an ongoing process that takes place in human history, light is gradually removed from the world of matter and returned to the world of light, whence it came. Its beliefs were based on local Mesopotamian religious movements and Gnosticism.[21]

In Christianity

[edit]
The Cathars being expelled from Carcassonne in 1209. The Cathars were denounced as heretics by the Roman Catholic Church for their dualist beliefs.

The dualism between God and Creation has existed as a central belief in multiple historical sects and traditions of Christianity, including Marcionism, Catharism, Paulicianism, and other forms of Gnostic Christianity. Christian dualism refers to the belief that God and creation are distinct, but interrelated through an indivisible bond.[1] However, Gnosticism is a diverse, syncretistic religious movement consisting of various belief systems generally united in a belief in a distinction between a supreme, transcendent God and a blind, evil demiurge responsible for creating the material universe, thereby trapping the divine spark within matter. Gnosticism is not limited to Christianity, and also incorporates beliefs from other Abrahamic traditions, such as early Jewish sects.[22]

In sects like the Cathars and the Paulicians, this is a dualism between the material world, created by an evil god, and a moral god. Historians divide Christian dualism into absolute dualism, which held that the good and evil gods were equally powerful, and mitigated dualism, which held that material evil was subordinate to the spiritual good.[23] The belief, by Christian theologians who adhere to a libertarian or compatibilist view of free will, that free will separates humankind from God has also been characterized as a form of dualism.[1] The theologian Leroy Stephens Rouner compares the dualism of Christianity with the dualism that exists in Zoroastrianism and the Samkhya tradition of Hinduism. The theological use of the word dualism dates back to 1700, in a book that describes the dualism between good and evil.[1]

The tolerance of dualism ranges widely among the different Christian traditions. As a monotheistic religion, the conflict between dualism and monism has existed in Christianity since its inception.[24] The 1912 Catholic Encyclopedia describes that, in the Catholic Church, "the dualistic hypothesis of an eternal world existing side by side with God was of course rejected" by the thirteenth century, but mind–body dualism was not.[25] The problem of evil is difficult to reconcile with absolute monism, and has prompted some Christian sects to veer towards dualism. Gnostic forms of Christianity were more dualistic, and some Gnostic traditions posited that the Devil was separate from God as an independent deity.[24] The Christian dualists of the Byzantine Empire, the Paulicians, were seen as Manichean heretics by Byzantine theologians. This tradition of Christian dualism, founded by Constantine-Silvanus, argued that the universe was created through evil and separate from a moral God.[26]

Cathars

[edit]
Main article: Catharism

The Cathars, a Christian sect in southern France, believed that there was a dualism between two gods, one representing good and the other representing evil. Whether or not the Cathari possessed direct historical influence from ancient Gnosticism is a matter of dispute, as the basic conceptions of Gnostic cosmology are to be found in Cathar beliefs (most distinctly in their notion of a lesser creator god), though unlike the second century Gnostics, they did not apparently place any special relevance upon knowledge (gnosis) as an effective salvific force. In any case, the Roman Catholic Church denounced the Cathars as heretics, and sought to crush the movement in the 13th century. The Albigensian Crusade was initiated by Pope Innocent III in 1208 to remove the Cathars from Languedoc in France, where they were known as Albigensians. The Inquisition, which began in 1233 under Pope Gregory IX, also targeted the Cathars.[27]

In Hinduism

[edit]

The Dvaita Vedanta school of Indian philosophy espouses a dualism between God and the universe by theorizing the existence of two separate realities. The first and the more important reality is that of Shiva or Shakti or Vishnu or Brahman. Shiva or Shakti or Vishnu is the supreme Self, God, the absolute truth of the universe, the independent reality. The second reality is that of dependent but equally real universe that exists with its own separate essence. Everything that is composed of the second reality, such as individual soul (Jiva), matter, etc. exist with their own separate reality. The distinguishing factor of this philosophy as opposed to Advaita Vedanta (monistic conclusion of Vedas) is that God takes on a personal role and is seen as a real eternal entity that governs and controls the universe.[28][better source needed] Because the existence of individuals is grounded in the divine, they are depicted as reflections, images or even shadows of the divine, but never in any way identical with the divine. Salvation therefore is described as the realization that all finite reality is essentially dependent on the Supreme.[29]

Ontological dualism

[edit]
The yin and yang symbolizes the duality in nature and all things in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Confucianism and Taoist religion.

Alternatively, dualism can mean the tendency of humans to perceive and understand the world as being divided into two overarching categories. In this sense, it is dualistic when one perceives a tree as a thing separate from everything surrounding it. This form of ontological dualism exists in Taoism and Confucianism and a foundational theory within Traditional Chinese medicine, beliefs that divide the universe into the complementary oppositions of yin and yang.[30] In traditions such as classical Hinduism (Samkhya, Yoga, Vaisheshika and the later Vedanta schools, which accepted the theory of Gunas), Chinese Pure land and Zen Buddhism or Islamic Sufism, a key to enlightenment is "transcending" this sort of dualistic thinking, without merely substituting dualism with monism or pluralism.

In Chinese philosophy

[edit]

The opposition and combination of the universe's two basic principles of yin and yang is a large part of Chinese philosophy, and is an important feature of Taoism, both as a philosophy and as a religion, although the concept developed much earlier. Some argue that yin and yang were originally an earth and sky god, respectively.[31]

Some of the common associations with yang and yin, respectively, are: male and female, light and dark, active and passive, motion and stillness. Some scholars believe that the two ideas may have originally referred to two opposite sides of a mountain, facing towards and away from the sun.[31] The yin and yang symbol actually has very little to do with Western dualism; instead it represents the philosophy of balance, where two opposites co-exist in harmony and are able to transmute into each other. In the yin-yang symbol there is a dot of yin in yang and a dot of yang in yin. In Taoism, this symbolizes the inter-connectedness of the opposite forces as different aspects of Tao, the First Principle. Contrast is needed to create a distinguishable reality, without which we would experience nothingness. Therefore, the independent principles of yin and yang are actually dependent on one another for each other's distinguishable existence.

The complementary dualistic concept seen in yin and yang represent the reciprocal interaction throughout nature, related to a feedback loop, where opposing forces do not exchange in opposition but instead exchange reciprocally to promote stabilization similar to homeostasis. An underlying principle in Taoism states that within every independent entity lies a part of its opposite. Within sickness lies health and vice versa. This is because all opposites are manifestations of the single Tao, and are therefore not independent from one another, but rather a variation of the same unifying force throughout all of nature.

In other religions

[edit]

Samoyed peoples

[edit]

In a Nenets myth, Num and Nga collaborate and compete with each other, creating land,[32] there are also other myths about competing-collaborating demiurges.[33]

Comparative studies of Kets and neighboring peoples

[edit]

Among others, also dualistic myths were investigated in researches which tried to compare the mythologies of Siberian peoples and settle the problem of their origins. Vyacheslav Ivanov and Vladimir Toporov compared the mythology of Ket people with those of speakers of Uralic languages, assuming in the studies, that there are modelling semiotic systems in the compared mythologies; and they have also made typological comparisons.[34][35] Among others, from possibly Uralic mythological analogies, those of Ob-Ugric peoples[36] and Samoyedic peoples[37] are mentioned. Some other discussed analogies (similar folklore motifs, and purely typological considerations, certain binary pairs in symbolics) may be related to dualistic organization of society—some of such dualistic features can be found at these compared peoples.[38] It must be admitted that, for Kets, neither dualistic organization of society[39] nor cosmological dualism[40] has been researched thoroughly: if such features existed at all, they have either weakened or remained largely undiscovered;[39] although there are some reports on division into two exogamous patrilinear moieties,[41] folklore on conflicts of mythological figures, and also on cooperation of two beings in creating the land:[40] the diving of the water fowl.[42] If we include dualistic cosmologies meant in broad sense, not restricted to certain concrete motifs, then we find that they are much more widespread, they exist not only among some Siberian peoples, but there are examples in each inhabited continent.[43]

Chukchi

[edit]

A Chukchi myth and its variations report the creation of the world; in some variations, it is achieved by the collaboration of several beings (birds, collaborating in a coequal way; or the creator and the raven, collaborating in a coequal way; or the creator alone, using the birds only as assistants).[44]

Fuegians

[edit]
See also: Fuegians § Spiritual culture

All three Fuegian tribes had dualistic myths about culture heroes.[45] The Yámana have dualistic myths about the two brothers. They act as culture heroes, and sometimes stand in an antagonistic relation with each other, introducing opposite laws. Their figures can be compared to the Kwanyip-brothers of the Selkʼnam.[46] In general, the presence of dualistic myths in two compared cultures does not imply relatedness or diffusion necessarily.[43]

See also

[edit]
  • Cosmology – Scientific study of the origin, evolution, and eventual fate of the universe
  • Didache – The Two Ways
  • Duality
  • Mind-body dualism – Philosophical theory
  • Cosmotheism – Idea that the entire universe is God
  • Evil twin – Archetype
  • Gnosticism – Early Christian and Jewish religious systems
  • Pantheism – Belief that God and reality are identical
  • Nondualism – Nonconceptual awareness and interconnectedness
  • Table of Opposites – Philosophical system based on the teachings of Pythagoras
  • Trinity – Christian doctrine that God exists in three persons
  • Yanantin

Footnotes

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Dualism in cosmology

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Dualism in cosmology encompasses metaphysical and religious frameworks that posit the universe's origin, structure, and dynamics as arising from or governed by two primordial, often antagonistic principles, such as good and evil, light and darkness, or spirit and matter. These principles are viewed as coeternal or independently originating forces whose interaction—typically conflict—shapes cosmic order, rather than a singular unifying source. Unlike monistic cosmologies that derive reality from one substance or principle, dualistic models emphasize irreducible opposition, often framing the material world as a battleground or flawed compromise between the two. Prominent historical exemplars include , where the supreme deity embodies truth and creation in perpetual ethical and cosmic struggle against Angra Mainyu, the spirit of destruction and falsehood, with the physical serving as the arena for this resolve-through-choice dynamic. This framework influenced subsequent traditions like , which extended dualism to an ontological divide between light particles trapped in darkness, requiring human participation in their liberation. Radical variants, such as those in Cathar and Bogomil beliefs, rejected the material cosmos as the domain of an inferior or evil creator, prioritizing spiritual escape over worldly engagement. Complementary forms appear in East Asian thought, as in the Taoist yin-yang interplay generating cosmic cycles without moral antagonism. Debates persist over the precise nature of these dualisms, particularly in , where some interpretations emphasize subordinate ethical opposition rather than equipotent ontological parity, reflecting tensions between monotheistic supremacy and explanatory dual principles for evil's persistence. Such cosmologies, while providing causal accounts for disorder and in pre-modern contexts, contrast sharply with empirical modern cosmology's unified models grounded in observable physics, lacking evidential basis for principles.

Definition and Core Principles

Fundamental Concepts of Dualistic Cosmology

Dualistic cosmology posits two primordial, antagonistic principles as the ultimate causal origins of the , typically framed as good versus or order versus chaos, whose eternal opposition generates the cosmos's , diversity, and moral dimension. These principles are independent and uncreated, with neither deriving from the other, leading to a where emerges from their irreducible conflict rather than unified emanation or divine alone. In this framework, the material world reflects a battleground of contending forces, explaining phenomena like natural disasters, , and cosmic imperfection as incursions by the malevolent principle into the domain of the benevolent one. Central to dualistic thought is the ethical dimension, where the principles embody choices between truth (aša) and falsehood (druj), influencing not only cosmic events but human agency through . For instance, Zoroastrian texts describe two primeval spirits—beneficent (spenta mainyu) aligned with creation and destructive (angra mainyu) intent on corruption—as twins of equal initial potency, whose selections determine the trajectories of and . This opposition drives a linear cosmology: good initiates ordered creation, evil disrupts it, yet the former's supremacy ensures eventual resolution, underscoring a causal chain where agency and consequence govern outcomes over deterministic harmony. Variants distinguish radical dualism, envisioning co-eternal equals in perpetual strife, from mitigated forms where one principle holds ontological priority, subordinating the other without eliminating its real efficacy. Empirical correlations link such dualisms to pastoral societies circa 1200 BCE, where intergroup conflicts fostered worldviews of inherent antagonism, contrasting with cooperative agrarian contexts yielding nondual unity. Scholarly analyses debate the primacy of ethical over ontological aspects, with Zoroastrian dualism emphasizing moral choice amid opposition rather than absolute parity, influencing later systems like Manichaeism's stark light-dark divide.

Oppositional Versus Complementary Forces

In dualistic cosmologies, oppositional forces manifest as two primordial, antagonistic principles—often characterized as , , or spirit and matter—that contend for dominance, shaping the through perpetual conflict rather than . This framework assumes the principles are co-eternal and irreducible, with cosmic events resulting from their clashes, such as the intrusion of into a originally good creation. Zoroastrian cosmology exemplifies this, where (the wise lord representing truth and light) battles Angra Mainyu (the destructive spirit embodying falsehood and darkness), with the material world emerging as a battleground for their opposition, ultimately resolvable only through eschatological victory of good. Complementary forces, in contrast, depict opposites as interdependent elements that mutually generate and sustain cosmic processes without intrinsic hostility, emphasizing balance and cyclical interplay over conquest. In this view, the principles interpenetrate to form a unified whole, where neither dominates but each defines and enables the other, fostering dynamic equilibrium in the universe's structure and evolution. Chinese cosmology's yin-yang paradigm illustrates this, with yin (dark, receptive, feminine) and (light, active, masculine) as correlated forces whose reciprocal interaction produces the five elements, seasons, and all phenomena, rooted in texts like the dating to circa 1000 BCE. The oppositional-complementary reflects deeper causal assumptions in cosmological dualism: the former privileges irreducible conflict as the driver of existence, akin to causal realism where antagonism necessitates intervention for resolution, while the latter aligns with first-principles interdependence, viewing polarity as inherent to unity without requiring ultimate subordination. Scholars note that strict dualism historically favors oppositional models in Indo-Iranian traditions, whereas complementary variants appear in East Asian and indigenous systems, though the latter are sometimes critiqued as mitigated dualisms bordering on due to their harmonious resolution. Mesoamerican cosmologies, such as Inca or Maya views, further embody complementary duality, with paired forces like upper/lower worlds or day/night maintaining reciprocity in creation myths, as evidenced in 16th-century codices and astronomical alignments.

Historical Origins and Development

Ancient Near Eastern and Indo-Iranian Roots

In Mesopotamian cosmology, primordial chaos and order were often depicted through oppositional conflicts among deities, as seen in the epic, composed around the 18th to 12th centuries BCE, where the god battles and defeats the chaotic sea monster to establish cosmic structure. This narrative reflects a temporary strife resolved by hierarchical dominance rather than persistent equilibrium between coequal principles, with chaos subdued but not eradicated as an independent force. Similar motifs appear in earlier Sumerian traditions, such as the separation of heaven and earth by , emphasizing division over moral opposition, without evidence of ethical dualism where principles vie eternally for cosmic control. Scholars note the absence of moral dualism in these systems, contrasting with later frameworks, as supernatural entities operated within a polytheistic balance rather than binary ethical antagonism. Indo-Iranian traditions provided a foundational shift toward structured dualism, rooted in a shared proto-Indo-Iranian religious system from the early BCE, which featured deities embodying order (ṛtá in Vedic parallels, aša in Iranian) against disruption, though without Zoroaster's radical ethical framing. , emerging as a reform within this context around 1500–1000 BCE, introduced cosmological dualism through the Gāthās attributed to (Zarathustra), portraying two primordial twin spirits—Spenta Mainyu (beneficent, aligned with , the Wise Lord) and Angra Mainyu (destructive)—who choose opposing paths of truth (aša) and deceit (druj), initiating a cosmic struggle shaping creation, human choice, and eschatological resolution. This framework posits the material world as a battleground where these principles contend, with creating through good spirit while evil corrupts, culminating in a final renovation () where good triumphs, marking the earliest known integration of ethical dualism into state cosmology under the from the 6th century BCE onward. Unlike Mesopotamian conflicts, this dualism emphasized and as causal mechanisms in cosmic order, influencing subsequent Indo-Iranian expressions while diverging from Vedic counterparts, where oppositional deities like asuras and devas lacked equivalent ethical primacy.

Spread Through Hellenistic and Medieval Periods

Following Alexander the Great's conquests, which facilitated cultural exchanges across Persia, , and from 323 BCE onward, Zoroastrian dualistic cosmology—centered on the cosmic opposition between (good) and Angra Mainyu (evil)—began influencing Hellenistic thought. Greek philosophers encountered Persian ideas during earlier conflicts and Seleucid rule (312–63 BCE), leading to syncretic elements such as the of and in Orphic and Pythagorean traditions, where the body-soul conflict mirrored Iranian dualism between spirit and matter. This contact prompted reflections on primordial forces shaping the cosmos, evident in post-Platonic Hellenistic texts positing struggles between beneficent and malevolent world-souls. In the late Hellenistic and early Roman eras (c. 1st–3rd centuries CE), dualism permeated Gnostic systems, which envisioned the material universe as the flawed creation of a opposed to a transcendent spiritual realm, drawing from Platonic ontology and Eastern cosmogonies. These frameworks emphasized a radical ontological divide, with the physical as a prison for divine sparks trapped in matter, influencing sects like the Sethians and Valentinians. Such ideas persisted amid philosophical , including Neoplatonism's hierarchical dualities, though often mitigated compared to stricter Eastern variants. Medieval transmission occurred primarily through , founded by Mani in 240 CE in Sassanid Persia, which synthesized Zoroastrian, Christian, and Buddhist dualism into a cosmology of light particles invading darkness, forming the mixed material world. Suppressed in the by 400 CE but surviving eastward, Manichaean doctrines reached via Armenian Paulicians (7th–9th centuries) and spread to through Bogomils (10th century), who adapted the myth of two eternal principles—one spiritual good, one material evil—governing creation. By the , these ideas infiltrated , manifesting in across and , where adherents rejected the Catholic sacraments as tied to the evil creator god and anticipated eschatological separation of light from matter; Cathar communities numbered tens of thousands by 1200, prompting the (1209–1229). This revival underscored dualism's resilience against monotheistic orthodoxy, with cosmological narratives emphasizing ongoing cosmic warfare.

Types of Dualistic Frameworks

Moral Dualism

Moral dualism in cosmological frameworks asserts the existence of two primordial, opposing principles defined by ethical qualities: one embodying benevolence, truth, and order (good), and the other representing malevolence, deception, and chaos (). These principles are viewed as independent and coeternal forces whose conflict constitutes the dynamic structure of the , rather than deriving from a singular source. This differs from non-moral dualisms by imputing inherent moral value to the opposition, framing cosmic history as an ethical battle with implications for creation, human destiny, and eschatological resolution. In such systems, the material world often emerges as a mixed domain resulting from the intrusion of into the good's domain, requiring active resistance to restore purity. , originating around the 2nd millennium BCE in ancient , exemplifies moral dualism through the eternal antagonism between , the wise lord of light and truth, and Angra Mainyu (), the destructive spirit of darkness and lie; this duality extends to human , where individuals choose alignment with good via thoughts, words, and deeds to aid the cosmic victory of good at the end of time. Similarly, , founded by the prophet Mani in the 3rd century CE in , posits a primordial division between particles of light (good, spiritual) and darkness (, material), with the cosmos as a battlefield where human souls, trapped light particles, must liberate themselves through ascetic knowledge and dualistic ethics. This moral orientation influences , emphasizing dual citizenship in the cosmic war: adherents are called to embody good principles to counteract 's corrupting influence, often through ritual purity, ethical conduct, and rejection of material entanglements. Critics from monotheistic traditions, such as orthodox Christianity and Islam, have rejected moral dualism for implying a limitation on divine , arguing that true stems from creaturely rebellion rather than an equal cosmic rival. Empirical analysis of ancient texts, like the Zoroastrian Gathas composed circa 1500–1000 BCE, reveals this dualism's roots in Indo-Iranian cosmology, where moral choice undergirds the observed order of natural and social phenomena, predating Hellenistic influences.

Ontological Dualism

Ontological dualism in cosmology posits two co-eternal, irreducible principles or substances as the foundational realities of existence, fundamentally distinct in their essence—one typically aligned with spirit, light, or goodness, and the other with matter, darkness, or evil—whose interaction or conflict gives rise to the structure and dynamics of the universe. This framework contrasts with moral dualism by emphasizing substantive ontological separation rather than ethical opposition arising from a shared origin or volitional choice; here, the principles are not derivative corruptions but independent categories of being, often explaining the material world's imperfection as inherent to one principle's nature. In , founded circa 240 CE in the by Mani (c. 216–274 CE), cosmological centers on the primordial division between the Kingdom of Light—embodying pure spirit, order, and the —and the Kingdom of Darkness, a realm of chaotic, self-willed matter and demonic particles. The universe emerges from Darkness's invasion of Light, prompting divine emanations to counter it, resulting in a cosmic mixture where light particles become imprisoned in material forms; this dualistic structure necessitates eschatological separation of substances through and elect to restore purity. Medieval Catharism, particularly its radical variant documented in 13th-century Languedoc texts like the Liber de duobus principiis (c. 1220–1240 CE), adopted a comparable absolute dualism, asserting two gods ab aeterno: a good, spiritual principle governing the immaterial realm of souls and a bad, —equated with the creator—who fashioned the physical as a of . Influenced via Bogomil intermediaries from Balkan Paulician and Manichaean transmissions dating to the 10th–11th centuries CE, this rejected orthodox Christian creation ex nihilo, viewing matter's flaws as ontologically intrinsic rather than fallen, with entailing the soul's escape from bodily entrapment. Such systems, while varying in details, uniformly imply a "vertical" cosmological where spiritual transcends and opposes , rendering monistic or emanationist alternatives—positing unity or derivation from one —incompatible due to the irreconcilable natures of the dual foundations. Historical critiques, including Augustine of Hippo's Contra Faustum (c. 397 CE), targeted Manichaean variants for undermining divine sovereignty by equating evil's origin to an autonomous substance, though proponents maintained this resolved by confining imperfection to one ontological domain.

Theistic and Polytheistic Variants

In theistic variants of dualistic cosmology, the opposing principles are personified as deities, often resulting in bitheism or ditheism, where two gods embody good and evil in rivalry or balance, directly influencing creation and cosmic order. Ditheism specifically entails two coequal divine powers in opposition, such as light versus darkness, with the universe emerging from their conflict; this framework accounts for the presence of evil without subordinating it to a singular creator. Zoroastrianism illustrates a qualified theistic dualism, in which the twin spirits—Spenta Mainyu (progressive spirit of good) and Angra Mainyu (destructive spirit of evil)—emerge from Ahura Mazda's ethical choice, initiating a temporal struggle that mixes good and evil elements in the world until the final renovation (Frashokereti) restores purity. This cosmology, rooted in the Gathas (circa 1500–1000 BCE), posits the spirits' choices at creation's dawn as determining the moral dualities of truth (asha) versus lie (druj), with Ahura Mazda ultimately supreme despite the evil spirit's autonomy. Zurvanism, a variant within ancient Iranian (circa 5th–4th century BCE), modifies this by introducing Zurvan (unlimited time) as a neutral supreme deity who sires the opposing twins Ohrmazd (good) and (evil) through doubt and desire, framing the cosmic dualism as offspring rivalry under a higher theistic unity; this system influenced later Zoroastrian texts like the , emphasizing infinite light versus encroaching darkness at creation's outset. Such theistic models prioritize causal agency in divine wills, explaining empirical observations of as outcomes of godly contention rather than mere or subordinate . Polytheistic variants of dualism integrate oppositional principles across a pantheon, where multiple deities collectively represent binary forces like celestial order versus terrestrial chaos, without reducing to two singular gods; this contrasts with ditheism's equality by distributing dualistic tensions among hierarchical or allied divinities. In pre-Zoroastrian Iranian polytheism, daevas (demonic gods) opposed ahuras (ethical deities), suggesting an early polytheistic dualism of chaotic versus ordered divine classes that Zoroaster reformed into stricter ethical theism. These frameworks often feature cyclical or balanced conflicts, as in some ancient Near Eastern cosmogonies where assemblies of gods battle primordial adversaries, embodying dualistic motifs of creation through strife amid divine multiplicity; however, they rarely posit coeternal principles equivalent to theistic ditheism, tending instead toward syncretism with monistic or henotheistic elements. Modern revivals like certain neopagan duotheisms invoke harmonious god-goddess pairs (e.g., solar masculine versus lunar feminine) to symbolize cosmological polarities, though these emphasize complementarity over antagonism.

Key Traditions and Manifestations

Zoroastrianism

, originating from the teachings of the prophet (also known as ), exhibits a form of ethical dualism in its cosmology, positing a cosmic conflict between the forces of good, embodied by , and evil, represented by Angra Mainyu. , the uncreated Wise Lord and supreme creator, stands as the source of truth () and order, while Angra Mainyu, the destructive spirit, introduces chaos and falsehood (druj). This framework is articulated primarily in the Gathas, the oldest hymns attributed to Zarathustra within the , the sacred scriptures compiled over centuries, with linguistic evidence suggesting composition between approximately 1500 and 1000 BCE. Unlike absolute ontological dualism, where opposing principles are co-eternal equals, Zoroastrianism maintains Ahura Mazda's ultimate supremacy, with Angra Mainyu as an adversarial but subordinate force originating from a primordial choice to oppose goodness. In Zoroastrian cosmology, creation unfolds through Ahura Mazda's deliberate acts in multiple stages, beginning with spiritual prototypes (menog) before manifesting in the material world (getig), including sky, water, earth, plants, animals, and humans as counterparts to goodness. Angra Mainyu's invasion corrupts these elements, introducing death, disease, and moral disorder, framing the as a battleground where principles clash without merging. This dualistic tension is not merely metaphysical but causal: evil arises from deliberate opposition to , manifesting in destructive actions that humans can recognize and counter through choices aligned with truth. The Avesta's later texts, such as the , elaborate this as a limited-time struggle spanning 12,000 years, divided into phases dominated sequentially by spiritual existence, material creation, and mixture of . Central to this cosmology is the ethical imperative for individuals to actively participate in the cosmic order by cultivating good thoughts, words, and deeds (humata, hukhta, hvarshta), thereby aiding against Angra Mainyu's influence. serves as the mechanism for this agency, with humans judged at the post-death based on their alignment with , determining temporary states in paradise or . This dualism underscores in Zoroastrian thought: actions generate consequences that reinforce or undermine the universal order, without predetermining outcomes. Eschatologically, Zoroastrian dualism culminates in , the final renovation, where , assisted by savior figures like , defeats Angra Mainyu definitively, resurrecting all souls, purifying the world through a molten metal ordeal, and restoring eternal perfection free of evil. This triumph affirms the temporality of evil's power, with the renewed creation embodying unadulterated under 's sole dominion. Such doctrines, preserved in Pahlavi texts like the despite later Islamic conquests reducing Zoroastrian adherents, highlight the tradition's emphasis on inevitable good prevailing through aligned human effort.

Manichaeism

, founded by the prophet Mani in the during the mid-3rd century CE, exemplifies radical ontological dualism in its cosmology, positing two uncreated, eternal, and opposed principles: the realm of Light, embodying goodness, spirit, and intellect under the , and the realm of , representing evil, matter, and chaos ruled by demonic forces. These principles existed in primordial separation, with Light in the north and Darkness in the south, but the inherent aggression of Darkness initiated an invasion, leading to the mixing of light particles within and the formation of the material as a for cosmic redemption. Mani, born circa 216 CE in to parents affiliated with the Elchasaite sect and executed around 277 CE under King , received revelations from an angelic twin that framed his teachings as the final, universal religion reconciling prior traditions like and . In Manichaean , the Father of Light responds to the Dark invasion by emanating the Primal Man, who leads divine forces in battle but is temporarily vanquished, with his light armor—souls and intellect—captured and incorporated into the dark realm, necessitating the creation of the world as a mechanism for extraction. The visible universe emerges through successive divine interventions: the Living Spirit constructs heavens and earth from mingled elements, celestial bodies function as luminous vessels aggregating freed light, and the demonic ruler of Darkness sires to perpetuate entrapment, countered by the historical prophets including Mani himself as the . Salvation in this dualistic framework hinges on and praxis to disentangle from darkness, with an elect class of ascetics abstaining from procreation, meat, and to avoid harming trapped particles, while lay hearers support them, ensuring the gradual restoration of purity until the final dissolves the into purified realms. This cosmology influenced subsequent dualistic movements but faced suppression in Persia by 3rd-century Zoroastrian authorities and later in the under edicts like Theodosius I's in 381 CE and Justinian's in 527 CE, contributing to its decline by the despite pockets in .

Gnostic and Pseudo-Christian Sects

Gnostic sects, emerging in the 1st and 2nd centuries CE amid and , typically advanced a cosmological dualism that contrasted a supreme, transcendent with a subordinate creator god, the , who fashioned the imperfect material from chaotic matter. This framework portrayed the physical universe as inherently flawed or illusory, trapping divine elements () within corruptible bodies, with salvation achievable via esoteric knowledge () that awakens the spirit to its alien origins. Scholarly analyses emphasize that such dualism underpinned Gnostic anticosmicism, rejecting the world's intrinsic goodness and attributing its disorders to the 's ignorance or malice, distinct from the unknowable Father's realm of pure spirit. Valentinian Gnosticism, propagated by Valentinus around 140 CE in , softened this dualism into a tripartite ontology of spirit, , and , yet retained opposition between the spiritual —emanations from the primal and —and the deficient material realm shaped by the , often identified with the biblical . Unlike stricter Sethian variants that posited irreconcilable enmity between light and darkness principles, Valentinians viewed as a deficiency rather than co-eternal evil, allowing for psychic s to potentially ascend through and moral effort. Primary texts from the , unearthed in near , , preserve these cosmologies, including the Apocryphon of John, which details the Yaldabaoth's arrogant formation of the from shadow-like substance. Pseudo-Christian dualist movements in medieval Europe, such as the Bogomils originating in 10th-century under priest Bogomil during Tsar Peter I's reign (927–969 CE), revived radical dualism by equating the material world's creator with , a rebellious or fallen elder son of God, in opposition to the benevolent spiritual Father. Bogomil cosmology mirrored Manichaean influences, positing two eternal principles—good (incorporeal light) and evil ()—with the former entrapped in the latter's domain, necessitating ascetic rejection of fleshly bonds like and oaths to liberate souls from cosmic fate (). This sect's doctrines spread westward, influencing Balkan and Byzantine regions until suppression by Orthodox authorities in the 11th–12th centuries. The Cathars, or Albigensians, active in southern France from the late 11th to early 13th centuries, adopted Bogomil-inspired absolute dualism, asserting two co-eternal gods: a good deity of pure spirit and realm of light, and an evil counterpart (often Rex Mundi or Lucifer) governing darkness and the corrupt material creation. Cathar perfecti (elect) taught that human souls, sparks of divine light, underwent reincarnative cycles in animal and human forms until purified through the consolamentum ritual, rejecting procreation and meat as perpetuating the evil god's dominion. Their cosmology dismissed Old Testament scriptures as products of the malevolent creator, prioritizing New Testament ethics of non-resistance, which fueled conflicts culminating in the Albigensian Crusade launched in 1209 CE by Pope Innocent III, leading to the sect's eradication by 1321. Historical records, including inquisitorial testimonies from the 1240s, confirm this dualistic rejection of a unitary divine authorship for creation, framing the universe as a battlefield of irreconcilable principles rather than a harmonious monotheistic order.

Eastern Philosophical Systems

In Indian philosophy, the Sāṃkhya school exemplifies ontological dualism by positing two co-eternal, independent realities: purusha, the passive, conscious principle, and prakṛti, the active, unconscious material cause from which the cosmos evolves through its three guṇas (qualities: sattva, rajas, tamas). Attributed to sage Kapila (circa 6th century BCE) and formalized in Īśvarakṛṣṇa's Sāṃkhya-kārikā (circa 350-450 CE), this atheistic framework describes cosmological manifestation as prakṛti's unevolved state transforming into intellect (buddhi), ego (ahaṃkāra), and the subtle and gross elements, with purusha as unchanging witness, avoiding creation ex nihilo. The Yoga school, closely allied and detailed in Patañjali's Yoga Sūtras (circa 2nd century BCE to 5th century CE), incorporates this dualism while adding a theistic element through Īśvara, yet retains the core separation of spirit and matter for liberation via discriminative knowledge. Dvaita Vedānta, established by Madhvācārya (1238–1317 CE) in , advances a theistic variant emphasizing five eternal distinctions (pañca-bheda): between God (Viṣṇu as supreme ), individual souls (jīvātman), matter, internal differences within souls and matter, and between souls and matter. This realism rejects monistic identity, positing a hierarchical cosmos where souls and matter depend on Viṣṇu but remain ontologically distinct, with cosmology rooted in scriptural exegesis of the Bhagavad Gītā and Upaniṣads, explaining creation as Viṣṇu's willful emanation without compromising divine transcendence. Madhvācārya's commentaries, such as on the Brahma Sūtras, argue against Advaita non-dualism by citing perceptual evidence of difference, influencing later Vaiṣṇava traditions. Taoist cosmology integrates yin-yang as correlative dual principles emerging from the undifferentiated , driving cosmic processes through mutual generation and transformation rather than conflict. Articulated in the (attributed to , circa 6th-4th century BCE) and the (compiled circa 1000-200 BCE), yin (receptive, dark, earth-associated) and yang (expansive, light, heaven-associated) form the taiji (supreme ultimate), engendering the five phases (wuxing) and the "ten thousand things" via cyclic balance, as in the Yijing's hexagrams modeling change. This non-moral dualism underpins natural harmony (he), contrasting oppositional Western forms by viewing opposites as interdependent and transformative, informing practices like and .

Indigenous and Tribal Cosmologies

In various African tribal cosmologies, dualistic principles structure both social and metaphysical realms, often manifesting as complementary oppositions rather than irreconcilable conflicts. Among the Kabre people of northern , a Voltaic ethnic group, symbolic dualism organizes mythical narratives, rituals, and daily practices, with paired categories such as "hot/cold," "male/female," and "sky/earth" reflecting a foundational cosmological binary that governs historical processes and social hierarchies. Similarly, in Igbo philosophy of southeastern , duality denotes harmonious interconnectedness between opposites like day/night or life/death, while dualism proper involves oppositional realms, such as the visible and the invisible spiritual domain, influencing ethical and existential interpretations of . Dogon cosmology in exemplifies structured dualities in creation myths and astronomical knowledge, where binary principles—such as the pairing of the primordial twins , representing water and speech, or the geometric twins in symbolism—underpin the universe's formation from vibrating matter and maintain balance between visible and invisible forces. These elements integrate moral, spatial, and temporal oppositions, with the emerging from a divided into complementary halves, fostering a that reconciles multiplicity through paired entities. In South American indigenous traditions, particularly among the Inca of ancient Cuzco, dualism permeates cosmology through the concept of hanan (upper) and hurin (lower) moieties, symbolizing hierarchical yet interdependent cosmic orders that extend to political narratives, architecture, and ritual pairings of creator deities like and his dual aspects. Andean yanantin complementarity further illustrates this, positing the as sustained by reciprocal dualities—e.g., sun/, male/female—essential for fertility and cosmic equilibrium, as observed in ethnographic accounts of Quechua-speaking communities. Unlike oppositional dualisms in Abrahamic-influenced systems, these tribal frameworks emphasize dynamic synthesis, where dual principles enable cyclical renewal rather than eternal strife. North American tribal cosmologies, such as those of some Plains or groups, occasionally feature dual creator figures or spirit twins embodying generative tensions, but these rarely resolve into absolutes, prioritizing relational balance over binary supremacy. Australian Aboriginal systems, by contrast, largely eschew ontological dualism for monistic ontologies where ancestral beings animate a unified landscape without fundamental oppositions. Such variations highlight that indigenous dualisms, when present, adapt to ecological and social contexts, diverging from universalist models by integrating binaries into holistic, place-based worldviews.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Alternatives

Theological and Monotheistic Objections

In monotheistic theology, cosmological dualism faces fundamental objections for attributing cosmic origins and ongoing governance to two co-eternal, opposing principles—typically —which undermines the of 's absolute unity, , and exclusive creatorship ex nihilo. Such dualism implies a limitation on divine sovereignty, as an independent evil force would rival as an uncreated , contradicting the monotheistic affirmation that all existence derives solely from one transcendent source without rival. This critique emphasizes causal realism: if is the ultimate cause of the , no parallel principle can possess equal ontological status, lest it fragment into irreconcilable domains beyond divine control. Christian theologians have historically articulated this objection against dualistic systems like , which posits primordial light and darkness in eternal conflict. , who adhered to Manichaeism for nearly a decade before his conversion around 386 CE, renounced its dualism in works such as Confessions and Contra Faustum, arguing that evil lacks substantive existence as a cosmic but constitutes a privation or corruption of the good created by God alone. This preserves God's benevolence and power, attributing moral evil to creaturely rather than an autonomous dark deity, a view reinforced in patristic critiques to safeguard Trinitarian against heresies that equated evil with a co-creator. The extended this rejection through condemnations of later dualistic movements, such as the Cathars in the 13th century, whose cosmology of spiritual light trapped in material darkness was deemed incompatible with scriptural . Jewish theology similarly opposes dualism, viewing it as antithetical to the Shema's declaration of God's indivisible oneness (Deuteronomy 6:4) and the prophetic insistence on as the sole architect of both and , order and chaos ( 45:7). Rabbinic tradition rejects any eternal dyad, interpreting evil () as an internal human inclination subordinate to divine will, not a rival cosmic entity, thereby maintaining without partitioning creation. This stance historically distanced from Hellenistic or Persian dualistic influences, prioritizing empirical fidelity to over speculative oppositions. Islamic doctrine echoes this critique, denouncing dualism (ithnayn or thanawiyya) as shirk-like that compromises , the absolute oneness of as the originator of all things, including apparent evils as tests or consequences of human agency ( 67:2). Medieval Muslim polemicists refuted Zoroastrian and Manichaean cosmologies for positing dual primordial principles, insisting instead on God's unchallenged qadar (decree) over light and shadow, with () as a created tempter lacking independent creative power. This objection underscores a unified causal order under divine unity, rejecting dualism's explanatory appeal to evil's origins as unnecessary given Allah's transcendence.

Philosophical and Logical Challenges

Philosophers such as Plotinus leveled critiques against Gnostic dualistic cosmologies, arguing that they introduce unnecessary multiplicity and deficiency into the divine realm, portraying the One as flawed or ignorant rather than a perfect, emanative source of all reality. In his Enneads (II.9), Plotinus rejected the Gnostic view of matter as an evil intrusion from an opposed principle, contending that such dualism undermines the hierarchical unity of being and attributes irrational change and passion to higher intelligibles, which logically cannot derive from a transcendent Good. This anticosmic stance also fails to explain the observed providential order in the cosmos, as emanation from the One accounts for both unity and diversity without positing eternal opposition. Early Christian thinkers like Augustine further challenged Manichaean cosmological dualism, which posits light and darkness as co-eternal substances in perpetual conflict, by highlighting its reliance on unverifiable mythology to explain natural phenomena and evil's origin. Augustine argued in works such as Contra Faustum that dualism's materialization of evil as a substantive principle leads to logical absurdities, such as fragmented divine particles requiring ritual extraction, and contradicts the scriptural unity of creation under a single, omnipotent God; instead, evil arises as privation or corruption within a good creation, avoiding the need for two uncreated realms. Similarly, John of Damascus, in his Dialogue contra Manichaeos, employed Aristotelian logic to refute the dualist separation of principles, asserting that true being is indivisible and that positing independent good and evil substances implies incoherence in causation and ontology, as opposition without subordination violates the principle of non-contradiction in explaining cosmic mixture and resolution. A core logical objection across dualistic systems, including Zoroastrian variants, concerns the intelligibility of an essentially principle: critics contend that evil lacks self-subsistence and presupposes good as its context for negation, rendering co-eternal dual principles parasitic and metaphysically unstable, as pure negativity cannot originate or persist independently without reducing to non-being. This challenge extends to explanatory parsimony, where dualism multiplies fundamental entities beyond necessity—violating principles akin to —failing to account for the cosmos's lawful coherence without invoking mechanisms for their interaction or temporary dominance of one over the other.

Empirical Rejections in Modern Science

Modern cosmology, grounded in and , describes the universe's origin and evolution through a singular, physically governed process beginning with the approximately 13.8 billion years ago, without requiring or evidencing two primordial opposing principles. The , supported by observations from the Planck satellite mission (2013–2018), posits a hot, dense initial state expanding under and quantum effects, yielding precise predictions for cosmic that match data on galaxy clustering and large-scale homogeneity. This framework unifies cosmic phenomena under mathematical laws, rendering dualistic posits—such as independent good and evil forces shaping matter—superfluous, as no observational anomalies demand their invocation. Key empirical support includes the (CMB) radiation, detected in 1965 by Penzias and Wilson at a blackbody spectrum of 2.725 K, with anisotropies at the 10^{-5} level confirming inflationary expansion from quantum fluctuations rather than conflicting metaphysical creations. Dualistic cosmologies, like Manichaean views of matter as an evil prison for light particles, predict heterogeneous cosmic domains or non-physical interventions, yet CMB uniformity and light-element abundances (e.g., 24% helium-4 by mass from ) align exclusively with naturalistic thermonuclear processes occurring 10–20 minutes post-Big Bang. Similarly, Type Ia supernovae observations (1998) revealed accelerating expansion driven by (~68% of energy density), a physical field-like component, not a moral dual force. Particle physics further undermines dual substance claims, with electroweak unification experimentally verified in at CERN's UA1 experiment, demonstrating four fundamental forces derivable from a single gauge symmetry group SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1), extensible toward grand unification without irreducible oppositions. Searches for non-baryonic influences, such as axions or WIMPs via experiments like LUX-ZEPLIN (ongoing since 2022), yield null results consistent with physical extensions, not separate realms; any dualistic "evil" principle would manifest as unexplained violations of conservation laws or , unobserved across 10^{17} eV scales probed by the LHC. Thus, empirical data favor a causally closed physical over dualistic models lacking predictive or falsifiable content.

Influence and Enduring Legacy

Impact on Abrahamic Religions and Western Philosophy

Cosmological dualism from Zoroastrianism influenced Judaism during the Achaemenid period (c. 550–330 BCE), contributing to the development of ideas about cosmic moral opposition, angels, demons, and eschatological judgment in Second Temple literature. This is evident in texts like the Qumran "Treatise of the Two Spirits" (1QS III:13–IV:26), composed between the 2nd century BCE and 1st century CE, which describes predetermined spirits of truth and falsehood vying for human allegiance under God's ultimate sovereignty. Such elements moderated strict dualism to align with monotheism, portraying evil as subordinate rather than co-eternal, yet marking a shift from earlier Hebrew views where evil stemmed directly from divine will or human agency. In , dualistic cosmology surfaced in syncretic sects like , established by the prophet Mani in 240 CE in , which fused Zoroastrian principles of light versus darkness with Christian narratives, asserting matter as inherently evil and requiring liberation of divine particles trapped within it. Orthodox rejected this as heresy, emphasizing creation's goodness and Satan's role as a fallen creature rather than an equal antagonist, as affirmed in councils like (325 CE). Echoes persisted in medieval movements such as (10th century ) and (12th–13th centuries ), where adherents posited two principles—a benevolent spiritual God and a malevolent creator of the physical world—leading to the Catholic Church's (1209–1229 CE) and subsequent to suppress them. Islam, rooted in strict (tawhid), systematically opposed dualism, as seen in Quranic assertions of God's singular sovereignty over creation and evil as a test of rather than an autonomous force (e.g., Quran 2:155, c. 610–632 CE). Nonetheless, peripheral influences appeared in heterodox groups like certain Ismaili Shiites, though mainstream Sunni and Twelver traditions upheld creation ex nihilo without dualistic . In , Zoroastrian and Manichaean dualism indirectly shaped early modern debates on substance and , informing Augustine's pre-conversion engagement (c. 373–382 CE) with Manichaean cosmology before his rejection in Confessions (c. 397–400 CE), which prioritized divine . This legacy contributed to discussions, as in Leibniz's (1710), addressing evil's compatibility with a benevolent creator without conceding ontological parity to opposing principles, thus reinforcing monistic frameworks over radical dualism.

Contemporary Relevance and Revivals

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, dualistic cosmologies have experienced limited revivals primarily within esoteric and neo-Gnostic traditions, often drawing on rediscovered ancient texts rather than widespread institutional adoption. The 1945 discovery of the in unearthed Gnostic manuscripts that articulate a stark dualism between a transcendent spiritual and a flawed material cosmos crafted by the , prompting renewed scholarly and popular interest in these frameworks as alternatives to monotheistic creation narratives. This has influenced modern Gnostic-inspired groups, such as the Apostolic Johannite Church founded in 2000, which incorporates dualistic elements in its cosmology, viewing the material world as a realm of illusion and entrapment requiring for liberation, though such organizations remain small-scale with memberships in the hundreds. Manichaean dualism, positing an eternal conflict between realms of light and darkness, persists in syncretic forms at sites like the Cao'an temple in , , where archaeological evidence and ongoing rituals blend Manichaean motifs—such as sun and veneration symbolizing light particles—with Buddhist practices; as of 2024, the temple functions as a cultural heritage site with devotees maintaining dualistic invocations against cosmic darkness. This represents one of the few verifiable continuations of historical dualistic cosmology into contemporary religious life, albeit localized and hybridized, contrasting with its near-extinction elsewhere by the . In , Rudolf Steiner's , developed from 1913 onward through the , revived Manichaean-inspired cosmology by describing evolutionary stages of the universe involving oppositional forces of spirit and matter, influencing and movements that peaked with over 10,000 Waldorf schools worldwide by 2020. However, these revivals operate on the fringes of mainstream religion and philosophy, with dualistic cosmologies critiqued for lacking empirical support in modern scientific paradigms like the Big Bang model and , which favor unified material origins without ontological opposition. Their contemporary relevance lies more in metaphorical applications, such as labeling polarized ideologies as "Manichaean" in political analysis—e.g., U.S. discourse post-2016 elections framing conflicts as absolute good-versus-evil struggles—than in literal cosmological adherence.

References

  1. https://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Zarathushtrian/notion_dualism.htm
  2. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/dualism/
  3. https://zagny.org/exploring-dualism-in-zoroastrianism/
  4. https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/zoroastrian/beliefs/dualism.shtml
  5. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/dualism
  6. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/10/1004
  7. https://www.academia.edu/20337578/Religious_Dualism_and_the_Abrahamic_Religions
  8. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/SMUO/COM-001180.xml?language=en
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385001202_Harmony_in_Duality_Exploring_the_Philosophical_Connections_between_Yin-Yang_in_Chinese_Thought_and_Dualism_in_Western_Philosophy
  10. https://www.csus.edu/cpns/library/te_dwd.pdf
  11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1507418
  12. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asna.201913718
  13. https://oyc.yale.edu/religious-studies/rlst-145/lecture-3
  14. https://www.grisda.org/the-unique-cosmology-of-genesis-1
  15. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/478466
  16. https://www.avesta.org/antia/Dualism_in_Greece_After_Contact_With_Persians.pdf
  17. http://zoroastrianheritage.blogspot.com/2011/04/zoroastrian-influence-on-greek.html
  18. https://jamestabor.com/understanding-hellenistic-dualism/
  19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1584656
  20. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cosmogony-iii/
  21. https://www.kroraina.com/varia/kaluzh/cdhfins.pdf
  22. https://brill.com/view/journals/scri/14/1/article-p334_23.xml
  23. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dualism/
  24. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cathars-albigensians-and-bogomils
  25. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004544222/BP000016.xml
  26. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/manicheism-1-general-survey/
  27. https://konekrusoskronos.wordpress.com/2017/03/11/manichaeism-an-ontological-dualistic-view-on-the-nature-of-existence/
  28. https://www.gotquestions.org/ditheism-bitheism.html
  29. https://www.avesta.org/dastur/Dinshaw_J_Irani_The_Gathas.pdf
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395548003_Zoroastrian_Religion
  31. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/zoroastrianism-and-contemporary-philosophy/90A3F66EAA2B12BA955C11DF5D9892C4
  32. https://parsikhabar.net/religion/ahura-mazda-and-angra-mainyu-in-zoroastrianisms-creation-mythology/24856/
  33. https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/zoroastrian/history/zoroaster_1.shtml
  34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1462275
  35. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/395548003_Zoroastrian_Religion
  36. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/frasokrti/
  37. https://www.academia.edu/109649250/Frashokereti_Restoring_the_Creation_from_a_Zoroastrian_Eschatological_Perspective
  38. https://www.ancientiranianstudies.ir/article_182404_en.html
  39. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/founder-of-manichaeism/dualistic-basis-of-manis-thought/6052BAFD36ACC99F26B1B837F56DBBED
  40. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/480284
  41. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/mani-founder-manicheism/
  42. https://iep.utm.edu/gnostic/
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318584410_Gnosis_and_gnosticism_Problems_of_terminology_and_dualism_as_the_most_important_characteristic
  44. https://gnosticismexplained.org/valentinus-and-the-valentinians/
  45. https://skent.ualberta.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Valentinian-Gnoticism-and-Classical-Samkhya-A-Thematic-and-Structural-Comparison.pdf
  46. https://academic.oup.com/book/60623/chapter/524784285
  47. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004430624/BP000004.xml
  48. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cathars-albigensians-and-bogomils/
  49. https://www.cathar.info/cathar_beliefs.htm
  50. https://iep.utm.edu/sankhya/
  51. https://www.comparativereligion.com/god.html
  52. https://iep.utm.edu/madhva/
  53. https://philosophy.institute/indian-philosophy/dvaita-vedanta-dualism-philosophy/
  54. https://bookoftao.com/blog/taoist-cosmology-time-and-the-universe
  55. http://zoroastrianheritage.blogspot.com/2011/09/yin-yang-dualism-development-of-concept.html
  56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3034578
  57. https://www.igwebuikeresearchinstitute.org/igwebuikepedia-articles.php?open=18
  58. http://www.jpanafrican.org/docs/vol3no6/3.5AfricanCosmo.pdf
  59. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/African-Cosmology-and-the-Duality-of-Western-The-an-Viriri-Mungwini/1e3b3e0917d3052bb4abe032d2d36ca0d5cf8d57
  60. https://prod.ials.sas.ac.uk/eintegraten/H93595Q/sdeterminez/H50821207Q/the%2Btwo%2Bfaces%2Bof%2Binca%2Bhistory%2Bdualism%2Bin%2Bthe%2Bnarratives%2Band%2Bcosmology%2Bof%2Bancient%2Bcuzco%2Bearly%2Bamericas%2Bhistory%2Band%2Bculture.pdf
  61. https://www.si.edu/object/siris_sil_983639
  62. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3086&context=nss_journal
  63. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003418047-3/native-american-cosmologies-stephen-mccluskey
  64. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.14318/hau7.1.019
  65. https://ntwrightpage.com/2016/07/12/mind-spirit-soul-and-body/
  66. https://www.bu.edu/religion/files/pdf/Beyond-the-BodySoul-Dichotomy.-Augustine-on-Paul-against-the-Manichees-and-Pelagians.pdf
  67. https://youngcalvinists.org/2023/01/14/augustine-and-chrysostom-on-manichaeism-2/
  68. https://dailymeditationswithmatthewfox.org/2023/01/19/mlk-jr-and-m-d-chenu-oppose-dualism-and-pay-a-price/
  69. https://ri.urd.ac.ir/article_100718_eb163548311d39eaa3233d4cb1aa58d1.pdf
  70. https://ojs.library.dal.ca/dionysius/article/view/dio24narbonne/2166
  71. https://www.academia.edu/8952572/Plotinuss_treatise_against_the_Gnostics
  72. https://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF1-04/TOC.htm
  73. https://classics.nsu.ru/schole/assets/files/15-2-baranov.pdf
  74. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/defensibility-of-zoroastrian-dualism/AFA32DF5850EFAFDB9E9B4BF5FC85C45
  75. https://reducing-suffering.org/the-many-fallacies-of-dualism/
  76. https://olli.gmu.edu/docstore/600docs/1403-651-3-Zoroastrianism%2C%2520Judaism%2C%2520and%2520Christianity.pdf
  77. https://www.thecollector.com/cathars-persecution-of-christians-13th-century/
  78. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/2/185
  79. https://www.intdemocratic.org/manichaean-uncivility-in-american-politics-2/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.