Hubbry Logo
DomeDomeMain
Open search
Dome
Community hub
Dome
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Dome
Dome
from Wikipedia

A dome (from Latin domus) is an architectural element similar to the hollow upper half of a sphere. There is significant overlap with the term cupola, which may also refer to a dome or a structure on top of a dome. The precise definition of a dome has been a matter of controversy and there are a wide variety of forms and specialized terms to describe them.

A dome can rest directly upon a rotunda wall, a drum, or a system of squinches or pendentives used to accommodate the transition in shape from a rectangular or square space to the round or polygonal base of the dome. The dome's apex may be closed or may be open in the form of an oculus, which may itself be covered with a roof lantern and cupola.

Domes have a long architectural lineage that extends back into prehistory. Domes were built in ancient Mesopotamia, and they have been found in Persian, Hellenistic, Roman, and Chinese architecture in the ancient world, as well as among a number of indigenous building traditions throughout the world. Dome structures were common in both Byzantine architecture and Sasanian architecture, which influenced that of the rest of Europe and Islam in the Middle Ages. The domes of European Renaissance architecture spread from Italy in the early modern period, while domes were frequently employed in Ottoman architecture at the same time. Baroque and Neoclassical architecture took inspiration from Roman domes.

Advancements in mathematics, materials, and production techniques resulted in new dome types. Domes have been constructed over the centuries from mud, snow, stone, wood, brick, concrete, metal, glass, and plastic. The symbolism associated with domes includes mortuary, celestial, and governmental traditions that have likewise altered over time. The domes of the modern world can be found over religious buildings, legislative chambers, sports stadiums, and a variety of functional structures.

Etymology

[edit]

The English word "dome" ultimately derives from the ancient Greek and Latin domus ("house"), which, up through the Renaissance, labeled a revered house, such as a Domus Dei, or "House of God", regardless of the shape of its roof. This is reflected in the uses of the Italian word duomo, the German/Icelandic/Danish word dom ("cathedral"), and the English word dome as late as 1656, when it meant a "Town-House, Guild-Hall, State-House, and Meeting-House in a city." The French word dosme came to acquire the meaning of a cupola vault, specifically, by 1660. This French definition gradually became the standard usage of the English dome in the eighteenth century as many of the most impressive Houses of God were built with monumental domes, and in response to the scientific need for more technical terms.[1][a]

Definitions

[edit]

Across the ancient world, curved-roof structures that would today be called domes had a number of different names reflecting a variety of shapes, traditions, and symbolic associations.[b][c][d][e] The shapes were derived from traditions of pre-historic shelters made from various impermanent pliable materials and were only later reproduced as vaulting in more durable materials.[b] The hemispherical shape often associated with domes today derives from Greek geometry and Roman standardization, but other shapes persisted, including a pointed and bulbous tradition inherited by some early Islamic mosques.[f]

Modern academic study of the topic has been controversial and confused by inconsistent definitions, such as those for cloister vaults and domical vaults.[g][h] Dictionary definitions of the term "dome" are often general and imprecise.[i] Generally-speaking, it "is non-specific, a blanket-word to describe an hemispherical or similar spanning element."[g][j] Published definitions include: hemispherical roofs alone;[k][l][m] revolved arches;[n][o][p] and vaults on a circular base alone,[q][r][s][t][u][v][w][x] circular or polygonal base,[y][z][aa][ab][ac] circular, elliptical, or polygonal base,[ad][ae][af] or an undefined area.[ag][ah][ai][aj][ak][al][am] Definitions specifying vertical sections include: semicircular, pointed, or bulbous;[r][ai][al] semicircular, segmental or pointed;[x][aj] semicircular, segmental, pointed, or bulbous;[s][t][u][v][af] semicircular, segmental, elliptical, or bulbous;[ae] and high profile, hemispherical, or flattened.[am] Domes with a circular base are called "circular domes", regardless of the shape of their cross-section.[2]

Comparison of a generic "true" arch (left) and a corbel arch (right)

Sometimes called "false" domes, corbel domes achieve their shape by extending each horizontal layer of stones inward slightly farther than the lower one until they meet at the top.[3] A "false" dome may also refer to a wooden dome.[4] The Italian use of the term finto, meaning "false", can be traced back to the 17th century in the use of vaulting made of reed mats and gypsum mortar.[5] "True" domes are said to be those whose structure is in a state of compression, with constituent elements of wedge-shaped voussoirs, the joints of which align with a central point. The validity of this is unclear, as domes built underground with corbelled stone layers are in compression from the surrounding earth.[6]

The precise definition of "pendentive" has also been a source of academic contention, such as whether or not corbelling is permitted under the definition and whether or not the lower portions of a sail vault should be considered pendentives.[7] Domes with pendentives can be divided into two kinds: simple and compound.[8] In the case of the simple dome, the pendentives are part of the same sphere as the dome itself; however, such domes are rare.[9] In the case of the more common compound dome, the pendentives are part of the surface of a larger sphere below that of the dome itself and form a circular base for either the dome or a drum section.[8]

The fields of engineering and architecture have lacked common language for domes, with engineering focused on structural behavior and architecture focused on form and symbolism.[an][i][e][ao][ap] Additionally, new materials and structural systems in the 20th century have allowed for large dome-shaped structures that deviate from the traditional compressive structural behavior of masonry domes. Popular usage of the term has expanded to mean "almost any long-span roofing system".[ao]

Elements

[edit]
Dome of the Church of the Assumption in Carcaixent

The word "cupola" is another word for "dome", and is usually used for a small dome upon a roof or turret.[10] "Cupola" has also been used to describe the inner side of a dome.[11][ab] The top of a dome is the "crown". The inner side of a dome is called the "intrados" and the outer side is called the "extrados".[12] As with arches, the "springing" of a dome is the base level from which the dome rises and the "haunch" is the part that lies roughly halfway between the base and the top.[12][13] Domes can be supported by an elliptical or circular wall called a "drum". If this structure extends to ground level, the round building may be called a "rotunda".[14] Drums are also called "tholobates" and may or may not contain windows. A "tambour" or "lantern" is the equivalent structure over a dome's oculus, supporting a cupola.[15]

When the base of the dome does not match the plan of the supporting walls beneath it (for example, a dome's circular base over a square bay), techniques are employed to bridge the two.[16] One technique is to use corbelling, progressively projecting horizontal layers from the top of the supporting wall to the base of the dome, such as the corbelled triangles often used in Seljuk and Ottoman architecture.[17] The simplest technique is to use diagonal lintels across the corners of the walls to create an octagonal base. Another is to use arches to span the corners, which can support more weight.[18] A variety of these techniques use what are called "squinches".[19] A squinch can be a single arch or a set of multiple projecting nested arches placed diagonally over an internal corner.[20] Squinch forms also include trumpet arches, niche heads (or half-domes),[19] trumpet arches with "anteposed" arches, and muqarnas arches.[21] Squinches transfer the weight of a dome across the gaps created by the corners and into the walls.[22] Pendentives are triangular sections of a sphere, like concave spandrels between arches, and transition from the corners of a square bay to the circular base of a dome. The curvature of the pendentives is that of a sphere with a diameter equal to the diagonal of the square bay.[23] Pendentives concentrate the weight of a dome into the corners of the bay.[22]

Materials

[edit]

The earliest domes in the Middle East were built with mud-brick and, eventually, with baked brick and stone. Domes of wood allowed for wide spans due to the relatively light and flexible nature of the material and were the normal method for domed churches by the 7th century, although most domes were built with the other less flexible materials. Wooden domes were protected from the weather by roofing, such as copper or lead sheeting.[24] Domes of cut stone were more expensive and never as large, and timber was used for large spans where brick was unavailable.[25]

Roman concrete used an aggregate of stone with a powerful mortar. The aggregate transitioned over the centuries to pieces of fired clay, then to Roman bricks. By the sixth century, bricks with large amounts of mortar were the principle vaulting materials. Pozzolana appears to have only been used in central Italy.[26] Brick domes were the favored choice for large-space monumental coverings until the Industrial Age, due to their convenience and dependability.[27] Ties and chains of iron or wood could be used to resist stresses.[28]

In the Middle East and Central Asia, domes and drums constructed from mud brick and baked brick were sometimes covered with brittle ceramic tiles on the exterior to protect against rain and snow.[29]

The new building materials of the 19th century and a better understanding of the forces within structures from the 20th century opened up new possibilities. Iron and steel beams, steel cables, and pre-stressed concrete eliminated the need for external buttressing and enabled much thinner domes. Whereas earlier masonry domes may have had a radius to thickness ratio of 50, the ratio for modern domes can be in excess of 800. The lighter weight of these domes not only permitted far greater spans, but also allowed for the creation of large movable domes over modern sports stadiums.[30]

Experimental rammed earth domes were made as part of work on sustainable architecture at the University of Kassel in 1983.[31]

Shapes and internal forces

[edit]

A masonry dome produces thrusts downward and outward. They are described as two kinds of forces at right angles to one another: meridional forces (like the meridians, or lines of longitude, on a globe) are compressive only, and increase towards the base, while hoop forces (like the lines of latitude on a globe) are in compression at the top and tension at the base, with the transition in a hemispherical dome occurring at an angle of 51.8 degrees from the top.[32] The thrusts generated by a dome are directly proportional to the weight of its materials.[33]

When hoop forces at the base of a masonry dome exceed the tensile strength of the dome, vertical cracks develop that make the dome act as a series of concentric wedge-shaped arches that do not necessarily compromise the overall structure.[34] Although some cracking along the meridians is natural, excessive outward thrusts in the lower portion of a hemispherical masonry dome can be counteracted with the use of chains incorporated around the circumference or with external buttressing.[32] Grounded hemispherical domes can still generate significant horizontal thrusts at their haunches.[35] For small or tall domes with less horizontal thrust, the thickness of the supporting arches or walls can be enough to resist deformation, which is why drums tend to be much thicker than the domes they support.[36]

Meridian forces can cause dangerous horizontal cracking when not enclosed in the structure. When such compression is focused on an inside surface, for example, the corresponding outside surface will be in tension and crack, with the inside surface acting as a hinge in a potential collapse.[37]

Unlike voussoir arches, which require support for each element until the keystone is in place, domes are stable during construction as each level is made a complete and self-supporting ring.[4] The upper portion of a masonry dome is always in compression and is supported laterally, so it does not collapse except as a whole unit and a range of deviations from the ideal in this shallow upper cap are equally stable.[38] Because voussoir domes have lateral support, they can be made much thinner than corresponding arches of the same span. For example, a hemispherical dome can be 2.5 times thinner than a semicircular arch, and a dome with the profile of an equilateral arch can be thinner still.[39]

The optimal shape for a masonry dome of equal thickness provides for perfect compression, with none of the tension or bending forces against which masonry is weak.[35] For a particular material, the optimal dome geometry is called the funicular surface, the comparable shape in three dimensions to a catenary curve for a two-dimensional arch.[40][41] The safe theorem by Jacques Heyman [de] states that when a thrust line is located within the wall of an arch it is in equilibrium and the arch is stable for a given load.[42] Adding a weight to the top of a pointed dome, such as the heavy cupola at the top of Florence Cathedral, changes the optimal shape to more closely match the actual pointed shape of the dome. The pointed profiles of many Gothic domes more closely approximate the optimal dome shape than do hemispheres, which were favored by Roman and Byzantine architects due to the circle being considered the most perfect of forms.[43]

Symbolism

[edit]

According to E. Baldwin Smith, from the late Stone Age the dome-shaped tomb was used as a reproduction of the ancestral, god-given shelter made permanent as a venerated home of the dead. The instinctive desire to do this resulted in widespread domical mortuary traditions across the ancient world, from the stupas of India to the tholos tombs of Iberia. By Hellenistic and Roman times, the domical tholos had become the customary cemetery symbol.[44]

Domes and tent-canopies were also associated with the heavens in Ancient Persia and the Hellenistic-Roman world. A dome over a square base reflected the geometric symbolism of those shapes. The circle represented perfection, eternity, and the heavens. The square represented the earth. An octagon was intermediate between the two.[45] The distinct symbolism of the heavenly or cosmic tent stemming from the royal audience tents of Achaemenid and Indian rulers was adopted by Roman rulers in imitation of Alexander the Great, becoming the imperial baldachin. This probably began with Nero, whose "Golden House" also made the dome a feature of palace architecture.[46]

The dual sepulchral and heavenly symbolism was adopted by early Christians in both the use of domes in architecture and in the ciborium, a domical canopy like the baldachin used as a ritual covering for relics or the church altar. The celestial symbolism of the dome, however, was the preeminent one by the Christian era.[47] In the early centuries of Islam, domes were closely associated with royalty. A dome built in front of the mihrab of a mosque, for example, was at least initially meant to emphasize the place of a prince during royal ceremonies. Over time such domes became primarily focal points for decoration or the direction of prayer. The use of domes in mausoleums can likewise reflect royal patronage or be seen as representing the honor and prestige that domes symbolized, rather than having any specific funerary meaning.[48] The wide variety of dome forms in medieval Islam reflected dynastic, religious, and social differences as much as practical building considerations.[24]

Acoustics

[edit]

Because domes are concave from below, they can reflect sound and create echoes.[49] A dome may have a "whispering gallery" at its base that at certain places transmits distinct sound to other distant places in the gallery.[15] The half-domes over the apses of Byzantine churches helped to project the chants of the clergy.[50] Although this can complement music, it may make speech less intelligible, leading Francesco Giorgi in 1535 to recommend vaulted ceilings for the choir areas of a church, but a flat ceiling filled with as many coffers as possible for where preaching would occur.[51] Disagreeing with his contemporaries, Vincenzo Scamozzi asserted in 1615 that dome vaulting assists acoustics, provided that the walls and other surfaces are "broken up as much as possible by cornices (preferably two superimposed orders), openings, cofferings, cavities, reliefs, and pilasters."[52]

Cavities in the form of jars built into the inner surface of a dome may serve to compensate for interference by diffusing sound in all directions, eliminating echoes while creating a "divine effect in the atmosphere of worship." This technique was written about by Vitruvius in his Ten Books on Architecture, which describes bronze and earthenware resonators.[49] The material, shape, contents, and placement of these cavity resonators determine the effect they have: reinforcing certain frequencies or absorbing them.[53]

Types

[edit]

Beehive dome

[edit]
Corbel dome

Also called a corbelled dome,[54] cribbed dome,[55] or false dome,[56] these are different from a 'true dome' in that they consist of purely horizontal layers. As the layers get higher, each is slightly cantilevered, or corbeled, toward the center until meeting at the top. A monumental example is the Mycenaean Treasury of Atreus from the late Bronze Age.[57]

Braced dome

[edit]

A single or double layer space frame in the form of a dome,[58] a braced dome is a generic term that includes ribbed,[59] Schwedler,[59] three-way grid,[59] lamella or Kiewitt,[60] lattice,[61] and geodesic domes.[62] The different terms reflect different arrangements in the surface members. Braced domes often have a very low weight and are usually used to cover spans of up to 150 meters.[63] Often prefabricated, their component members can either lie on the dome's surface of revolution, or be straight lengths with the connecting points or nodes lying upon the surface of revolution. Single-layer structures are called frame or skeleton types and double-layer structures are truss types, which are used for large spans. When the covering also forms part of the structural system, it is called a stressed skin type. The formed surface type consists of sheets joined at bent edges to form the structure.[58]

Cloister vault

[edit]
Domical or cloister vault

Also called domical vaults (a term sometimes also applied to sail vaults),[64][65] polygonal domes,[66] coved domes,[67] gored domes,[68] segmental domes[69] (a term sometimes also used for saucer domes), paneled vaults,[70] or pavilion vaults,[71] these are domes that maintain a polygonal shape in their horizontal cross section. The component curved surfaces of these vaults are called severies, webs, or cells.[72] The earliest known examples date to the first century BC, such as the Tabularium of Rome from 78 BC. Others include the Baths of Antoninus in Carthage (145–160) and the Palatine Chapel at Aachen (13th – 14th century).[73] The most famous example is the Renaissance octagonal dome of Filippo Brunelleschi over the Florence Cathedral. Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States, installed an octagonal dome above the West front of his plantation house, Monticello.[74]

Compound dome

[edit]
Compound dome

Also called domes on pendentives[75] or pendentive domes[76] (a term also applied to sail vaults), compound domes have pendentives that support a smaller diameter dome immediately above them, as in the Hagia Sophia, or a drum and dome, as in many Renaissance and post-Renaissance domes, with both forms resulting in greater height.[8]

Crossed-arch dome

[edit]
Crossed-arch dome (Cordoba Mosque)

One of the earliest types of ribbed vault, the first known examples are found in the Great Mosque of Córdoba in the 10th century. Rather than meeting in the center of the dome, the ribs characteristically intersect one another off-center, forming an empty polygonal space in the center. Geometry is a key element of the designs, with the octagon being perhaps the most popular shape used. Whether the arches are structural or purely decorative remains a matter of debate. The type may have an eastern origin, although the issue is also unsettled. Examples are found in Spain, North Africa, Armenia, Iran, France, and Italy.[77]

Ellipsoidal dome

[edit]

The ellipsoidal dome is a surface formed by the rotation around a vertical axis of a semi-ellipse. Like other "rotational domes" formed by the rotation of a curve around a vertical axis, ellipsoidal domes have circular bases and horizontal sections and are a type of "circular dome" for that reason.[78]

Geodesic dome

[edit]
Geodesic dome (Montreal Biosphere, Canada)

Geodesic domes are the upper portion of geodesic spheres. They are composed of a framework of triangles in a polyhedron pattern.[79] The structures are named for geodesics and are based upon geometric shapes such as icosahedrons, octahedrons or tetrahedrons.[79][4] Such domes can be created using a limited number of simple elements and joints and efficiently resolve a dome's internal forces. Their efficiency is said to increase with size.[80] Although not first invented by Buckminster Fuller, they are associated with him because he designed many geodesic domes and patented them in the United States.[81]

Hemispherical dome

[edit]
Hemispherical dome

The hemispherical dome is a surface formed by the rotation around a vertical axis of a semicircle. Like other "rotational domes" formed by the rotation of a curve around a vertical axis, hemispherical domes have circular bases and horizontal sections and are a type of "circular dome" for that reason. They experience vertical compression along their meridians, but horizontally experience compression only in the portion above 51.8 degrees from the top. Below this point, hemispherical domes experience tension horizontally, and usually require buttressing to counteract it.[78] According to E. Baldwin Smith, it was a shape likely known to the Assyrians, defined by Greek theoretical mathematicians, and standardized by Roman builders.[82]

Bulbous domes and onion domes

[edit]
Onion dome of the Gur-e-Amir Mausoleum, Samarkand (c. 1403), the first fully monumental example of the onion dome, influential in later Islamic and Mughal domes.

Bulbous domes are domes that swell outward beyond their base diameter, giving them a distinctive curved, bulb-like silhouette. An onion dome is a specific type of bulbous dome characterized by an ogee (S-shaped) profile that ends in a pointed apex rising well above a hemisphere.[83]

Bulbous and onion domes first appeared in Islamic architecture. The concept emerged as early as the Umayyad period (7th–8th centuries), as seen in mosaic illustrations from Syria depicting domed pavilions with swollen profiles—suggesting that such forms were envisioned as part of architectural design.[84] However, if any structural examples were built during this period, they have not survived or been archaeologically documented. The earliest known surviving structural examples of bulbous domes date to the Abbasid Caliphate in the 9th century, such as the Qubbat al-Sulaibiya in Samarra (c. 862 CE), one of the first domes to display a subtly bulbous form.[85]

During the 11th–12th centuries, bulbous domes developed further under the Seljuks in Persia. Domes such as those in the Jameh Mosque of Isfahan became taller and more curved, edging closer to the onion forms seen later.[86]

In the Ottoman Empire, bulbous domes became a hallmark of imperial architecture from the 14th century onward. Early examples include the dome of the Green Mosque, Bursa, characterized by pronounced bulbous profiles with smooth, rounded curves. In the 16th century, under the master architect Mimar Sinan, Ottoman domes reached new heights of structural ingenuity and refined proportions. His masterpieces, such as the Süleymaniye Mosque, feature large bulbous domes with optimized curvature for load distribution and aesthetic balance, achieving spatial solutions and visual unity that surpassed Byzantine dome construction. Additionally, smaller bulbous domes were widely used over domed porticoes and arcaded courtyards, where rows of columns support sequences of small domes, creating a rhythmic skyline that became a defining element of Ottoman mosque complexes.[87] These domes significantly influenced architectural styles in Anatolia, the Balkans, Central Europe, and beyond.

Starting in the late 14th century, with this artistic tradition flourishing especially during the 15th century, the Mamluks in Egypt, constructed shallow but clearly bulbous domes, especially in mausoleums like that of Sultan Qaytbay in Cairo. These domes were carved in stone with complex geometric and vegetal motifs, marking a distinct regional style.[88]

The first fully monumental onion domes appeared under the Timurids in Central Asia in the early 15th century. The Gur-e Amir Mausoleum in Samarkand (1403) introduced tall, externally ribbed domes with pronounced bulbous curves and brilliant turquoise tiles, setting a visual and structural model for later domes across the Islamic world.[89]

In Muslim South Asia, the Mughal Empire brought the onion dome to its heights. The Taj Mahal (1632–1648), with its soaring, balanced dome, double-shell construction, and carefully proportioned curvature, set a new standard of scale and refinement for onion domes.[90]

In Islamic architecture, bulbous and onion domes are typically constructed from masonry, with their thick, swelling profiles designed to counteract lateral thrust at the base, enhancing structural stability.[83] These domes became a defining feature of Islamic and Indo-Islamic architecture, contributing to the structural and aesthetic identity of iconic monuments across regions.

In Russian architecture, bulbous and onion domes became prominent from the late 15th century onward, notably in landmarks such as Saint Basil's Cathedral in Moscow. Many historians attribute their spread to Central Asian and Islamic influences transmitted through the Tatar-Mongol cultural sphere, rather than independent development. Earlier domes in Kievan Rus' were typically shallower and lacked the pronounced curvature of later examples. Onion domes became more widespread during and after Tatar rule, as architectural ties with the Islamic world deepened.[91]

In Central Europe, bulbous and onion domes, often wooden and placed atop towers, emerged in the late 15th century and became prominent, primarily decorative features of Baroque churches and civic buildings during the 16th and 17th centuries in regions such as the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. Notable examples include the bulbous onion domes of the Karlskirche in Vienna and the Frauenkirche in Dresden. They are primarily ornamental, and their forms may have been inspired by Islamic domes, minaret finials, or both.[92]

Oval dome

[edit]
An oval dome (Rome, Italy)

An oval dome is a dome of oval shape in plan, profile, or both. The term comes from the Latin ovum, meaning "egg". The earliest oval domes were used by convenience in corbelled stone huts as rounded but geometrically undefined coverings, and the first examples in Asia Minor date to around 4000 B.C. The geometry was eventually defined using combinations of circular arcs, transitioning at points of tangency. If the Romans created oval domes, it was only in exceptional circumstances. The Roman foundations of the oval plan Church of St. Gereon in Cologne point to a possible example. Domes in the Middle Ages also tended to be circular, though the church of Santo Tomás de las Ollas in Spain has an oval dome over its oval plan. Other examples of medieval oval domes can be found covering rectangular bays in churches. Oval plan churches became a type in the Renaissance and popular in the Baroque style.[93] The dome built for the basilica of Vicoforte by Francesco Gallo was one of the largest and most complex ever made.[94] Although the ellipse was known, in practice, domes of this shape were created by combining segments of circles. Popular in the 16th and 17th centuries, oval and elliptical plan domes can vary their dimensions in three axes or two axes. [citation needed] A sub-type with the long axis having a semicircular section is called a Murcia dome, as in the Chapel of the Junterones at Murcia Cathedral. When the short axis has a semicircular section, it is called a Melon dome.[citation needed]

Paraboloid dome

[edit]

A paraboloid dome is a surface formed by the rotation around a vertical axis of a sector of a parabola. Like other "rotational domes" formed by the rotation of a curve around a vertical axis, paraboloid domes have circular bases and horizontal sections and are a type of "circular dome" for that reason. Because of their shape, paraboloid domes experience only compression, both radially and horizontally.[78]

Sail dome

[edit]
Sail dome

Also called sail vaults,[95] handkerchief vaults,[96] domical vaults (a term sometimes also applied to cloister vaults),[65] pendentive domes[97][98] (a term that has also been applied to compound domes), Bohemian vaults,[99] or Byzantine domes,[citation needed] this type can be thought of as pendentives that, rather than merely touching each other to form a circular base for a drum or compound dome, smoothly continue their curvature to form the dome itself. The dome gives the impression of a square sail pinned down at each corner and billowing upward.[16] These can also be thought of as saucer domes upon pendentives.[69] Sail domes are based upon the shape of a hemisphere and are not to be confused with elliptic parabolic vaults, which appear similar but have different characteristics.[78] In addition to semicircular sail vaults there are variations in geometry such as a low rise to span ratio or covering a rectangular plan. Sail vaults of all types have a variety of thrust conditions along their borders, which can cause problems, but have been widely used from at least the sixteenth century. The second floor of the Llotja de la Seda is covered by a series of nine meter wide sail vaults.[citation needed]

Saucer dome

[edit]
Saucer dome (Louisiana Superdome, Louisiana, US)

Also called segmental domes[100] (a term sometimes also used for cloister vaults), or calottes,[16] these have profiles of less than half a circle. Because they reduce the portion of the dome in tension, these domes are strong but have increased radial thrust.[100] Many of the largest existing domes are of this shape.

Masonry saucer domes, because they exist entirely in compression, can be built much thinner than other dome shapes without becoming unstable. The trade-off between the proportionately increased horizontal thrust at their abutments and their decreased weight and quantity of materials may make them more economical, but they are more vulnerable to damage from movement in their supports.[101]

Umbrella dome

[edit]
Umbrella dome (Santa Croce, Florence)

Also called gadrooned,[102] fluted,[102] organ-piped,[102] pumpkin,[16] melon,[16] ribbed,[102] parachute,[16] scalloped,[103] or lobed domes,[104] these are a type of dome divided at the base into curved segments, which follow the curve of the elevation.[16] "Fluted" may refer specifically to this pattern as an external feature, such as was common in Mamluk Egypt.[4] The "ribs" of a dome are the radial lines of masonry that extend from the crown down to the springing.[12] The central dome of the Hagia Sophia uses the ribbed method, which accommodates a ring of windows between the ribs at the base of the dome. The central dome of St. Peter's Basilica also uses this method.

History

[edit]
Some historical domes to scale

Early history and simple domes

[edit]
Apache wigwam, by Edward S. Curtis, c. 1903

Cultures from pre-history to modern times constructed domed dwellings using local materials. Although it is not known when the first dome was created, sporadic examples of early domed structures have been discovered. The earliest discovered may be four small dwellings made of Mammoth tusks and bones. The first was found by a farmer in Mezhirich, Ukraine, in 1965 while he was digging in his cellar and archaeologists unearthed three more.[105] They date from 19,280 – 11,700 BC.[106]

In modern times, the creation of relatively simple dome-like structures has been documented among various indigenous peoples around the world. The wigwam was made by Native Americans using arched branches or poles covered with grass or hides. The Efé people of central Africa construct similar structures, using leaves as shingles.[107] Another example is the igloo, a shelter built from blocks of compact snow and used by the Inuit, among others. The Himba people of Namibia construct "desert igloos" of wattle and daub for use as temporary shelters at seasonal cattle camps, and as permanent homes by the poor.[108] Extraordinarily thin domes of sun-baked clay 20 feet in diameter, 30 feet high, and nearly parabolic in curve, are known from Cameroon.[109]

The historical development from structures like these to more sophisticated domes is not well documented. That the dome was known to early Mesopotamia may explain the existence of domes in both China and the West in the first millennium BC.[110] Another explanation, however, is that the use of the dome shape in construction did not have a single point of origin and was common in virtually all cultures long before domes were constructed with enduring materials.[111]

Corbelled stone domes have been found from the Neolithic period in the ancient Near East, and in the Middle East to Western Europe from antiquity.[112][113] The kings of Achaemenid Persia held audiences and festivals in domical tents derived from the nomadic traditions of central Asia.[114] Simple domical mausoleums existed in the Hellenistic period.[115] Indian bas-relief sculptures from Sāñcī (1st century BC), Bhārhut (2nd century BC), and Amarāvatī (2nd century BC), show domed huts, shrines, and pavilions.[116] The remains of a large domed circular hall in the Parthian capital city of Nyssa has been dated to perhaps the first century AD, showing "...the existence of a monumental domical tradition in Central Asia that had hitherto been unknown and which seems to have preceded Roman Imperial monuments or at least to have grown independently from them."[117] It likely had a wooden dome.[118]

East Asian domes

[edit]
Model of the Lei Cheng Uk Han Tomb (25–220 AD)

Very little has survived of ancient Chinese architecture, due to the extensive use of timber as a building material. Brick and stone vaults used in tomb construction have survived, and the corbeled dome was used, rarely, in tombs and temples.[119] The earliest true domes found in Chinese tombs were shallow cloister vaults, called simian jieding, derived from the Han use of barrel vaulting. Unlike the cloister vaults of western Europe, the corners are rounded off as they rise.[120] The first known example is a brick tomb dating from the end of the Western Han period, near the modern city of Xiangcheng in Henan Province. These four-sided domes used small interlocking bricks and enabled a square space near the entrance of a tomb large enough for several people that may have been used for funeral ceremonies. The interlocking brick technique was rapidly adopted and four-sided domes became widespread outside Henan by the end of the first century AD.[121]

A model of a tomb found with a shallow true dome from the late Han dynasty (206 BC – 220 AD) can be seen at the Guangzhou Museum (Canton).[122] Another, the Lei Cheng Uk Han Tomb, found in Hong Kong in 1955, has a design common among Eastern Han dynasty (25 AD – 220 AD) tombs in South China: a barrel vaulted entrance leading to a domed front hall with barrel vaulted chambers branching from it in a cross shape. It is the only such tomb that has been found in Hong Kong and is exhibited as part of the Hong Kong Museum of History.[123][124]

During the Three Kingdoms period (220–280), the "cross-joint dome" (siyuxuanjinshi) was developed under the Wu and Western Jin dynasties south of the Yangtze River, with arcs building out from the corners of a square room until they met and joined at the center. These domes were stronger, had a steeped angle, and could cover larger areas than the relatively shallow cloister vaults. Over time, they were made taller and wider. There were also corbel vaults, called diese, although these are the weakest type.[125] Some tombs of the Song dynasty (960–1279) have beehive domes.[122]

The Seokguram Grotto (751), built in the Korean city of Gyeongju during the Unified Silla period, includes a domed chamber 7.2 meters wide covering a statue of the Buddha. The dome is made from blocks of granite, with the flat cap of the dome decorated with a lotus flower motif. The dome is unique in north-east Asia.[126]

The Buddhism monastery Baoguo near Ningbo has three domes dated to 1013. The Daoist monastery Yongle Gong in Shanxi has domes in its Hall of the Three Purities, from the 13th century.[127]

The Fenghuang Mosque in Hangzhou has three domes along its back wall dating to the Yuan dynasty. The central dome is 8 meters in diameter and covered by an octagonal roof. The north and south flanking domes are 6.8 meters and 7.2 meters wide, respectively, and covered by hexagonal roofs. The zones of transition under the domes use a tiered system similar to muqarnas or the corner bracketing found in Chinese temples.[128]

Roman and Byzantine domes

[edit]
The Pantheon in Rome, painting by Giovanni Paolo Pannini

Roman domes are found in baths, villas, palaces, and tombs. oculi are common features.[129] They are customarily hemispherical in shape and partially or totally concealed on the exterior. To buttress the horizontal thrusts of a large hemispherical masonry dome, the supporting walls were built up beyond the base to at least the haunches of the dome, and the dome was then also sometimes covered with a conical or polygonal roof.[130]

Domes reached monumental size in the Roman Imperial period.[131] Roman baths played a leading role in the development of domed construction in general, and monumental domes in particular. Modest domes in baths dating from the 2nd and 1st centuries BC are seen in Pompeii, in the cold rooms of the Terme Stabiane and the Terme del Foro.[131][132] However, the extensive use of domes did not occur before the 1st century AD.[133] The growth of domed construction increases under Emperor Nero and the Flavians in the 1st century AD, and during the 2nd century. Centrally-planned halls become increasingly important parts of palace and palace villa layouts beginning in the 1st century, serving as state banqueting halls, audience rooms, or throne rooms.[134] The Pantheon, a temple in Rome completed by Emperor Hadrian as part of the Baths of Agrippa, is the most famous, best preserved, and largest Roman dome.[135] Segmented domes, made of radially concave wedges or of alternating concave and flat wedges, appear under Hadrian in the 2nd century and most preserved examples of this style date from this period.[136]

In the 3rd century, Imperial mausoleums began to be built as domed rotundas, rather than as tumulus structures or other types, following similar monuments by private citizens.[137] The technique of building lightweight domes with interlocking hollow ceramic tubes further developed in North Africa and Italy in the late third and early fourth centuries.[138] In the 4th century, Roman domes proliferated due to changes in the way domes were constructed, including advances in centering techniques and the use of brick ribbing.[139] The material of choice in construction gradually transitioned during the 4th and 5th centuries from stone or concrete to lighter brick in thin shells.[140] Baptisteries began to be built in the manner of domed mausoleums during the 4th century in Italy. The octagonal Lateran baptistery or the baptistery of the Holy Sepulchre may have been the first, and the style spread during the 5th century.[141] By the 5th century, structures with small-scale domed cross plans existed across the Christian world.[142]

With the end of the Western Roman Empire, domes became a signature feature of the church architecture of the surviving Eastern Roman — or "Byzantine" — Empire.[143] 6th-century church building by the Emperor Justinian used the domed cross unit on a monumental scale, and his architects made the domed brick-vaulted central plan standard throughout the Roman east. This divergence with the Roman west from the second third of the 6th century may be considered the beginning of a "Byzantine" architecture.[144] Justinian's Hagia Sophia was an original and innovative design with no known precedents in the way it covers a basilica plan with dome and semi-domes. Periodic earthquakes in the region have caused three partial collapses of the dome and necessitated repairs.[145]

Originally a church, Hagia Sophia (532–537) by Byzantine emperor Justinian the Great was the largest cathedral in the world for nearly a thousand years.

"Cross-domed units", a more secure structural system created by bracing a dome on all four sides with broad arches, became a standard element on a smaller scale in later Byzantine church architecture.[146][147] The Cross-in-square plan, with a single dome at the crossing or five domes in a quincunx pattern, became widely popular in the Middle Byzantine period (c. 843–1204).[148][149][146] It is the most common church plan from the tenth century until the fall of Constantinople in 1453.[150] Resting domes on circular or polygonal drums pierced with windows eventually became the standard style, with regional characteristics.[151]

In the Byzantine period, domes were normally hemispherical and had, with occasional exceptions, windowed drums. All of the surviving examples in Constantinople are ribbed or pumpkin domes, with the divisions corresponding to the number of windows. Roofing for domes ranged from simple ceramic tile to more expensive, more durable, and more form-fitting lead sheeting. Metal clamps between stone cornice blocks, metal tie rods, and metal chains were also used to stabilize domed construction.[152] The technique of using double shells for domes, although revived in the Renaissance, originated in Byzantine practice.[153]


Persian domes

[edit]
Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque, Isfahan

Persian architecture likely inherited an architectural tradition of dome-building dating back to the earliest Mesopotamian domes.[154] Due to the scarcity of wood in many areas of the Iranian plateau and Greater Iran, domes were an important part of vernacular architecture throughout Persian history.[155] The Persian invention of the squinch, a series of concentric arches forming a half-cone over the corner of a room, enabled the transition from the walls of a square chamber to an octagonal base for a dome in a way reliable enough for large constructions and domes moved to the forefront of Persian architecture as a result.[156] Pre-Islamic domes in Persia are commonly semi-elliptical, with pointed domes and those with conical outer shells being the majority of the domes in the Islamic periods.[157]

The area of north-eastern Iran was, along with Egypt, one of two areas notable for early developments in Islamic domed mausoleums, which appear in the tenth century.[158] The Samanid Mausoleum in Transoxiana dates to no later than 943 and is the first to have squinches create a regular octagon as a base for the dome, which then became the standard practice. Cylindrical or polygonal plan tower tombs with conical roofs over domes also exist beginning in the 11th century.[155]

Tombs with dome-like (and vault) structures, dating from the 8th to the 6th centuries BCE, have also been found in archaeological excavations at Susa and Jubaji in Khuzestan, a province of Iran.[159][160]

The Seljuk Empire's notables built tomb-towers, called "Turkish Triangles", as well as cube mausoleums covered with a variety of dome forms. Seljuk domes included conical, semi-circular, and pointed shapes in one or two shells. Shallow semi-circular domes are mainly found from the Seljuk era. The double-shell domes were either discontinuous or continuous.[161] The domed enclosure of the Jameh Mosque of Isfahan, built in 1086-7 by Nizam al-Mulk, was the largest masonry dome in the Islamic world at that time, had eight ribs, and introduced a new form of corner squinch with two quarter domes supporting a short barrel vault. In 1088 Tāj-al-Molk, a rival of Nizam al-Mulk, built another dome at the opposite end of the same mosque with interlacing ribs forming five-pointed stars and pentagons. This is considered the landmark Seljuk dome, and may have inspired subsequent patterning and the domes of the Il-Khanate period. The use of tile and of plain or painted plaster to decorate dome interiors, rather than brick, increased under the Seljuks.[155]

Beginning in the Ilkhanate, Persian domes achieved their final configuration of structural supports, zone of transition, drum, and shells, and subsequent evolution was restricted to variations in form and shell geometry. Characteristic of these domes are the use of high drums and several types of discontinuous double-shells, and the development of triple-shells and internal stiffeners occurred at this time. The construction of tomb towers decreased.[162] The 7.5 meter wide double dome of Soltan Bakht Agha Mausoleum (1351–1352) is the earliest known example in which the two shells of the dome have significantly different profiles, which spread rapidly throughout the region.[163] The development of taller drums also continued into the Timurid period.[155] The large, bulbous, fluted domes on tall drums that are characteristic of 15th century Timurid architecture were the culmination of the Central Asian and Iranian tradition of tall domes with glazed tile coverings in blue and other colors.[24]

The domes of the Safavid dynasty (1501–1732) are characterized by a distinctive bulbous profile and are considered the last generation of Persian domes. They are generally thinner than earlier domes and are decorated with a variety of colored glazed tiles and complex vegetal patterns, and they were influential on those of other Islamic styles, such as the Mughal architecture of India.[164] An exaggerated style of onion dome on a short drum, as can be seen at the Shah Cheragh (1852–1853), first appeared in the Qajar period. Domes have remained important in modern mausoleums, and domed cisterns and icehouses remain common sights in the countryside.[155]

Arabic and Western European domes

[edit]
The Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem

The Syria and Palestine area has a long tradition of domical architecture, including wooden domes in shapes described as "conoid", or similar to pine cones. When the Arab Muslim forces conquered the region, they employed local craftsmen for their buildings and, by the end of the 7th century, the dome had begun to become an architectural symbol of Islam.[165] In addition to religious shrines, such as the Dome of the Rock, domes were used over the audience and throne halls of Umayyad palaces, and as part of porches, pavilions, fountains, towers and the calderia of baths. Blending the architectural features of both Byzantine and Persian architecture, the domes used both pendentives and squinches and were made in a variety of shapes and materials.[166] Although architecture in the region would decline following the movement of the capital to Iraq under the Abbasids in 750, mosques built after a revival in the late 11th century usually followed the Umayyad model.[167] Early versions of bulbous domes can be seen in mosaic illustrations in Syria dating to the Umayyad period. They were used to cover large buildings in Syria after the eleventh century.[168]

Italian church architecture from the late sixth century to the end of the eighth century was influenced less by the trends of Constantinople than by a variety of Byzantine provincial plans.[169] With the crowning of Charlemagne as a new Roman Emperor, Byzantine influences were largely replaced in a revival of earlier Western building traditions. Occasional exceptions include examples of early quincunx churches at Milan and near Cassino.[169] Another is the Palatine Chapel. Its domed octagon design was influenced by Byzantine models.[170][171] It was the largest dome north of the Alps at that time.[172] Venice, Southern Italy and Sicily served as outposts of Middle Byzantine architectural influence in Italy.[173]

The Great Mosque of Córdoba contains the first known examples of the crossed-arch dome type.[174] The use of corner squinches to support domes was widespread in Islamic architecture by the 10th and 11th centuries.[148] After the ninth century, mosques in North Africa often have a small decorative dome over the mihrab. Additional domes are sometimes used at the corners of the mihrab wall, at the entrance bay, or on the square tower minarets.[175] Egypt, along with north-eastern Iran, was one of two areas notable for early developments in Islamic mausoleums, beginning in the 10th century.[115] Fatimid mausoleums were mostly simple square buildings covered by a dome. Domes were smooth or ribbed and had a characteristic Fatimid "keel" shape profile.[176]

Domes in Romanesque architecture are generally found within crossing towers at the intersection of a church's nave and transept, which conceal the domes externally.[177] They are typically octagonal in plan and use corner squinches to translate a square bay into a suitable octagonal base.[9] They appear "in connection with basilicas almost throughout Europe" between 1050 and 1100.[178] The Crusades, beginning in 1095, also appear to have influenced domed architecture in Western Europe, particularly in the areas around the Mediterranean Sea.[179] The Knights Templar, headquartered at the site, built a series of centrally planned churches throughout Europe modeled on the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, with the Dome of the Rock also an influence.[180] In southwest France, there are over 250 domed Romanesque churches in the Périgord region alone.[181] The use of pendentives to support domes in the Aquitaine region, rather than the squinches more typical of western medieval architecture, strongly implies a Byzantine influence.[64] Gothic domes are uncommon due to the use of rib vaults over naves, and with church crossings usually focused instead by a tall steeple, but there are examples of small octagonal crossing domes in cathedrals as the style developed from the Romanesque.[182]

Star-shaped domes found at the Moorish palace of the Alhambra in Granada, Spain, the Hall of the Abencerrajes (c. 1333–91) and the Hall of the two Sisters (c. 1333–54), are extraordinarily developed examples of muqarnas domes.[182] In the first half of the fourteenth century, stone blocks replaced bricks as the primary building material in the dome construction of Mamluk Egypt and, over the course of 250 years, around 400 domes were built in Cairo to cover the tombs of Mamluk sultans and emirs.[183] Dome profiles were varied, with "keel-shaped", bulbous, ogee, stilted domes, and others being used. On the drum, angles were chamfered, or sometimes stepped, externally and triple windows were used in a tri-lobed arrangement on the faces.[184] Bulbous cupolas on minarets were used in Egypt beginning around 1330, spreading to Syria in the following century.[185] In the fifteenth century, pilgrimages to and flourishing trade relations with the Near East exposed the Low Countries of northwest Europe to the use of bulbous domes in the architecture of the Orient and such domes apparently became associated with the city of Jerusalem. Multi-story spires with truncated bulbous cupolas supporting smaller cupolas or crowns became popular in the sixteenth century.[186]

Russian domes

[edit]
Gilded onion domes of the Cathedral of the Annunciation, Moscow Kremlin.

The multidomed church is a typical form of Russian church architecture that distinguishes Russia from other Orthodox nations and Christian denominations. Indeed, the earliest Russian churches, built just after the Christianization of Kievan Rus', were multi-domed, which has led some historians to speculate about how Russian pre-Christian pagan temples might have looked. Examples of these early churches are the 13-domed wooden Saint Sophia Cathedral in Novgorod (989) and the 25-domed stone Desyatinnaya Church in Kiev (989–996). The number of domes typically has a symbolical meaning in Russian architecture, for example 13 domes symbolize Christ with 12 Apostles, while 25 domes means the same with an additional 12 Prophets of the Old Testament. The multiple domes of Russian churches were often comparatively smaller than Byzantine domes.[187][188]

Saint Basil's Cathedral (1555–61) in Moscow, Russia. Its distinctive onion domes date to the 1680s.

Plentiful timber in Russia made wooden domes common and at least partially contributed to the popularity of onion domes, which were easier to shape in wood than in masonry.[189] The earliest stone churches in Russia featured Byzantine style domes, however by the Early Modern era the onion dome had become the predominant form in traditional Russian architecture. The onion dome is a dome whose shape resembles an onion, after which they are named. Such domes are often larger in diameter than the drums they sit on, and their height usually exceeds their width. The whole bulbous structure tapers smoothly to a point. Though the earliest preserved Russian domes of such type date from the 16th century, illustrations from older chronicles indicate they have existed since the late 13th century. Like tented roofs—which were combined with, and sometimes replaced domes in Russian architecture since the 16th century—onion domes initially were used only in wooden churches. Builders introduced them into stone architecture much later, and continued to make their carcasses of either of wood or metal on top of masonry drums.[190]

Russian domes are often gilded or brightly painted. A dangerous technique of chemical gilding using mercury had been applied on some occasions until the mid-19th century, most notably in the giant dome of Saint Isaac's Cathedral. The more modern and safe method of gold electroplating was applied for the first time in gilding the domes of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow, the tallest Eastern Orthodox church in the world.[191]

Ukrainian domes

[edit]

The domes of the Saint Sophia Cathedral and Dormition Cathedral were remodeled to the helmet-shaped baroque style by Ivan Mazepa in the early 18th century, who also paid for gilding of the domes. Mazepa's reign also included the construction of an octagonal western bay with a baroque dome (1672) and five helmet-shaped domes over Boris and Gleb Cathedral in Chernihiv, which were removed in the 20th century by the Soviet government.[192]

Ottoman domes

[edit]
Selimiye Mosque dome in Edirne, Turkey

The rise of the Ottoman Empire and its spread in Asia Minor and the Balkans coincided with the decline of the Seljuk Turks and the Byzantine Empire. Early Ottoman buildings, for almost two centuries after 1300, were characterized by a blending of Ottoman culture and indigenous architecture, and the pendentive dome was used throughout the empire.[193] The Byzantine dome form was adopted and further developed.[24] Ottoman architecture made exclusive use of the semi-spherical dome for vaulting over even very small spaces, influenced by the earlier traditions of both Byzantine Anatolia and Central Asia.[194] The smaller the structure, the simpler the plan, but mosques of medium size were also covered by single domes.[195]

Early experiments with large domes include the domed square mosques of Çine and Mudurnu under Bayezid I, and the later domed "zawiya-mosques" at Bursa. The Üç Şerefeli Mosque at Edirne developed the idea of the central dome being a larger version of the domed modules used throughout the rest of the structure to generate open space. This idea became important to the Ottoman style as it developed.[194]

Blue Mosque in Istanbul, a World Heritage Site and example of the classical style period of Ottoman architecture, showing Byzantine influence.

The Bayezid II Mosque (1501–1506) in Istanbul begins the classical period in Ottoman architecture, in which the great imperial mosques, with variations, resemble the former Byzantine basilica of Hagia Sophia in having a large central dome with semi-domes of the same span to the east and west.[citation needed] Hagia Sophia's central dome arrangement is largely reproduced in three Ottoman mosques in Istanbul: the Bayezid II Mosque, the Kılıç Ali Pasha Mosque, and the Süleymaniye Mosque.[196] Other Imperial mosques in Istanbul added semi-domes to the north and south, doing away with the basilica plan, starting with the Şehzade Mosque and seen again in later examples such as the Sultan Ahmed I Mosque and the Yeni Cami.[197] The classical period lasted into the 17th century but its peak is associated with the architect Mimar Sinan in the 16th century.[198] In addition to large imperial mosques, he designed hundreds of other monuments, including medium-sized mosques such as the Mihrimah Sultan Mosque, Sokollu Mehmed Pasha Mosque, and Rüstem Pasha Mosque and the tomb of Suleiman the Magnificent, with its double-shell dome.[199] The Süleymaniye Mosque, built from 1550 to 1557, has a main dome 53 meters high with a diameter of 26.5 meters.[200] At the time it was built, the dome was the highest in the Ottoman Empire when measured from sea level, but lower from the floor of the building and smaller in diameter than that of the nearby Hagia Sophia.[citation needed]

Another classical domed mosque type is, like the Byzantine church of Sergius and Bacchus, the domed polygon within a square. Octagons and hexagons were common, such as those of the Üç Şerefeli Mosque (1437–1447) and the Selimiye Mosque in Edirne.[citation needed] The Selimiye Mosque was the first structure built by the Ottomans that had a larger dome than that of the Hagia Sophia. The dome rises above a square bay. Corner semi-domes convert this into an octagon, which muqarnas transition to a circular base. The dome has an average internal diameter of about 31.5 meters, while that of Hagia Sophia averages 31.3 meters.[201] Designed and built by architect Mimar Sinan between 1568 and 1574, when he finished it he was 86 years old, and he considered the mosque his masterpiece.

The Maqam an-Nabi Yusha', near the Golan Heights, is purported to be the tomb of the Joshua and includes two domed chambers. The principal room is the west domed chamber, which has a hemispherical dome on a short circular drum and spherical pendentives. The west domed chamber was built earlier than the east domed chamber and appears to be from the 18th century.[202]

Italian Renaissance domes

[edit]
The Cathedral of Florence with Brunelleschi's dome, Italy

Filippo Brunelleschi's octagonal brick domical vault over Florence Cathedral was built between 1420 and 1436 and the lantern surmounting the dome was completed in 1467. The dome is 42 meters wide and made of two shells.[203] The dome is not itself Renaissance in style, although the lantern is closer.[204] A combination of dome, drum, pendentives, and barrel vaults developed as the characteristic structural forms of large Renaissance churches following a period of innovation in the later fifteenth century.[205] Florence was the first Italian city to develop the new style, followed by Rome and then Venice.[206] Brunelleschi's domes at San Lorenzo and the Pazzi Chapel established them as a key element of Renaissance architecture.[207] His plan for the dome of the Pazzi Chapel in Florence's Basilica of Santa Croce (1430–52) illustrates the Renaissance enthusiasm for geometry and for the circle as geometry's supreme form. This emphasis on geometric essentials would be very influential.[208]

De re aedificatoria, written by Leon Battista Alberti around 1452, recommends vaults with coffering for churches, as in the Pantheon, and the first design for a dome at St. Peter's Basilica in Rome is usually attributed to him, although the recorded architect is Bernardo Rossellino. This would culminate in Bramante's 1505–06 projects for a wholly new St. Peter's Basilica, marking the beginning of the displacement of the Gothic ribbed vault with the combination of dome and barrel vault, which proceeded throughout the sixteenth century.[209] Bramante's initial design was for a Greek cross plan with a large central hemispherical dome and four smaller domes around it in a quincunx pattern. Work began in 1506 and continued under a succession of builders over the next 120 years.[210] The dome was completed by Giacomo della Porta and Domenico Fontana.[210] The publication of Sebastiano Serlio's treatise, one of the most popular architectural treatises ever published, was responsible for the spread of the oval in late Renaissance and Baroque architecture throughout Italy, Spain, France, and central Europe.[211]

The Villa Capra, also known as "La Rotunda", was built by Andrea Palladio from 1565 to 1569 near Vicenza. Its highly symmetrical square plan centers on a circular room covered by a dome, and it proved highly influential on the Georgian architects of 18th century England, architects in Russia, and architects in America, Thomas Jefferson among them. Palladio's two domed churches in Venice are San Giorgio Maggiore (1565–1610) and Il Redentore (1577–92), the latter built in thanksgiving for the end of a bad outbreak of plague in the city.[212] The spread of the Renaissance-style dome outside of Italy began with central Europe, although there was often a stylistic delay of a century or two.[213]

South Asian domes

[edit]
The Taj Mahal in Agra, India built by Shah Jahan.

Hemispherical rock-cut tombs appear to imitate in stone the early bamboo or timber roofed domed huts with central poles known from the pre-Buddhist period. Examples include Sudama cave (3rd century BC) in Bihar, a similar domed chamber at Cannanora in Malabar, and a cave at Guntpalle (1st century BC). A rock-cut hemispherical chamber at Manappuram in Kerala retained a thin central pillar with no structural function.[214] The hemispherical shape of Buddhist stupas, likely refined forms of burial mounds, may also reflect earlier wooden dome roof construction, such as at Ghantasala.[215]

Islamic rule over northern and central India brought with it the use of domes constructed with stone, brick and mortar, and iron dowels and cramps. Centering was made from timber and bamboo. The use of iron cramps to join together adjacent stones was known in pre-Islamic India, and was used at the base of domes for hoop reinforcement. The synthesis of styles created by this introduction of new forms to the Hindu tradition of trabeate construction created a distinctive architecture.[216] Domes in pre-Mughal India have a standard squat circular shape with a lotus design and bulbous finial at the top, derived from Hindu architecture. Because the Hindu architectural tradition did not include arches, flat corbels were used to transition from the corners of the room to the dome, rather than squinches.[24] In contrast to Persian and Ottoman domes, the domes of Indian tombs tend to be more bulbous.[217]

The Shah Jahan Mosque's main dome in Thatta, Pakistan, has tiles arranged in a stellate pattern to represent the night sky.

The earliest examples include the half-domes of the late 13th century tomb of Balban and the small dome of the tomb of Khan Shahid, which were made of roughly cut material and would have needed covering surface finishes.[218] Under the Lodi dynasty there was a large proliferation of tomb building, with octagonal plans reserved for royalty and square plans used for others of high rank, and the first double dome was introduced to India in this period.[219] The first major Mughal building is the domed tomb of Humayun, built between 1562 and 1571 by a Persian architect. The central double dome covers an octagonal central chamber about 15 meters wide and is accompanied by small domed chattri made of brick and faced with stone.[220] Chatris, the domed kiosks on pillars characteristic of Mughal roofs, were adopted from their Hindu use as cenotaphs.[221] The fusion of Persian and Indian architecture can be seen in the dome shape of the Taj Mahal: the bulbous shape derives from Persian Timurid domes, and the finial with lotus leaf base is derived from Hindu temples.[24] The Gol Gumbaz, or Round Dome, is one of the largest masonry domes in the world. It has an internal diameter of 41.15 meters and a height of 54.25 meters.[222] The dome was the most technically advanced built in the Deccan.[223] The last major Islamic tomb built in India was the tomb of Safdar Jang (1753–54). The central dome is reportedly triple-shelled, with two relatively flat inner brick domes and an outer bulbous marble dome, although it may actually be that the marble and second brick domes are joined everywhere but under the lotus leaf finial at the top.[224]

Early modern period domes

[edit]
The dome of St Paul's Cathedral in London

In the early sixteenth century, the lantern of the Italian dome spread to Germany, gradually adopting the bulbous cupola from the Netherlands.[225] Russian architecture strongly influenced the many bulbous domes of the wooden churches of Bohemia and Silesia and, in Bavaria, bulbous domes less resemble Dutch models than Russian ones. Domes like these gained in popularity in central and southern Germany and in Austria in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, particularly in the Baroque style, and influenced many bulbous cupolas in Poland and Eastern Europe in the Baroque period. However, many bulbous domes in eastern Europe were replaced over time in the larger cities during the second half of the eighteenth century in favor of hemispherical or stilted cupolas in the French or Italian styles.[226]

The construction of domes in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries relied primarily on empirical techniques and oral traditions rather than the architectural treatises of the times, which avoided practical details. This was adequate for domes up to medium size, with diameters in the range of 12 to 20 meters. Materials were considered homogeneous and rigid, with compression taken into account and elasticity ignored. The weight of materials and the size of the dome were the key references. Lateral tensions in a dome were counteracted with horizontal rings of iron, stone, or wood incorporated into the structure.[227]

Over the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, developments in mathematics and the study of statics led to a more precise formalization of the ideas of the traditional constructive practices of arches and vaults, and there was a diffusion of studies on the most stable form for these structures: the catenary curve.[94] Robert Hooke, who first articulated that a catenary arch was comparable to an inverted hanging chain, may have advised Wren on how to achieve the crossing dome of St. Paul's Cathedral. Wren's structural system became the standard for large domes well into the 19th century.[228] The ribs in Guarino Guarini's San Lorenzo and Il Sidone were shaped as catenary arches.[229] The idea of a large oculus in a solid dome revealing a second dome originated with him.[230] He also established the oval dome as a reconciliation of the longitudinal plan church favored by the liturgy of the Counter-Reformation and the centralized plan favored by idealists.[231] Because of the imprecision of oval domes in the Rococo period, drums were problematic and the domes instead often rested directly on arches or pendentives.[232]

In the eighteenth century, the study of dome structures changed radically, with domes being considered as a composition of smaller elements, each subject to mathematical and mechanical laws and easier to analyse individually, rather than being considered as whole units unto themselves.[94] Although never very popular in domestic settings, domes were used in a number of 18th century homes built in the Neo-Classical style.[233] In the United States, most public buildings in the late 18th century were only distinguishable from private residences because they featured cupolas.[234]

Modern period domes

[edit]
Geodesic domes of the Eden Project in United Kingdom

The historicism of the 19th century led to many domes being re-translations of the great domes of the past, rather than further stylistic developments, especially in sacred architecture.[235] New production techniques allowed for cast iron and wrought iron to be produced both in larger quantities and at relatively low prices during the Industrial Revolution. Russia, which had large supplies of iron, has some of the earliest examples of iron's architectural use.[236] Excluding those that simply imitated multi-shell masonry, metal framed domes such as the elliptical dome of Royal Albert Hall in London (57 to 67 meters in diameter) and the circular dome of the Halle au Blé in Paris may represent the century's chief development of the simple domed form.[237] Cast-iron domes were particularly popular in France.[207]

The concrete dome of Saint Sava Church was entirely built from prefabricated slabs. It was hydraulically lifted from the ground to 40 m height by lift-slab method. 1935–2004

The practice of building rotating domes for housing large telescopes was begun in the 19th century, with early examples using papier-mâché to minimize weight.[238] Unique glass domes springing straight from ground level were used for hothouses and winter gardens.[239] Elaborate covered shopping arcades included large glazed domes at their cross intersections.[240] The large domes of the 19th century included exhibition buildings and functional structures such as gasometers and locomotive sheds.[241] The "first fully triangulated framed dome" was built in Berlin in 1863 by Johann Wilhelm Schwedler and, by the start of the 20th century, similarly triangulated frame domes had become fairly common.[242][243] Vladimir Shukhov was also an early pioneer of what would later be called gridshell structures and in 1897 he employed them in domed exhibit pavilions at the All-Russia Industrial and Art Exhibition.[243]

Domes built with steel and concrete were able to achieve very large spans.[207] In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Guastavino family, a father and son team who worked on the eastern seaboard of the United States, further developed the masonry dome, using tiles set flat against the surface of the curve and fast-setting Portland cement, which allowed mild steel bar to be used to counteract tension forces.[244] The thin domical shell was further developed with the construction by Walther Bauersfeld of two planetarium domes in Jena, Germany in the early 1920s. They consisting of a triangulated frame of light steel bars and mesh covered by a thin layer of concrete.[245] These are generally taken to be the first modern architectural thin shells.[246] These are also considered the first geodesic domes.[79] Geodesic domes have been used for radar enclosures, greenhouses, housing, and weather stations.[247] Architectural shells had their heyday in the 1950s and 1960s, peaking in popularity shortly before the widespread adoption of computers and the finite element method of structural analysis.[248]

The first permanent air supported membrane domes were the radar domes designed and built by Walter Bird after World War II. Their low cost eventually led to the development of permanent versions using teflon-coated fiberglass and by 1985 the majority of the domed stadiums around the world used this system.[249] Tensegrity domes, patented by Buckminster Fuller in 1962, are membrane structures consisting of radial trusses made from steel cables under tension with vertical steel pipes spreading the cables into the truss form. They have been made circular, elliptical, and other shapes to cover stadiums from Korea to Florida.[250] Tension membrane design has depended upon computers, and the increasing availability of powerful computers resulted in many developments being made in the last three decades of the 20th century.[251] The higher expense of rigid large span domes made them relatively rare, although rigidly moving panels is the most popular system for sports stadiums with retractable roofing.[252][253]

See also

[edit]

Excerpts

[edit]
  1. ^ Parker 2012, p. 97: "Dome, a cupola; the term is derived from the Italian duomo, a cathedral, the custom of erecting cupolas on those buildings having been so prevalent that the name dome has, in the French and English languages, been transferred from the church to this kind of roof [See Cupola.]"
  2. ^ a b Smith 1950, p. 6: "The domical shape must be distinguished from domical vaulting because the dome, both as idea and as method of roofing, originated in pliable materials upon a primitive shelter and was later preserved, venerated, and translated into more permanent materials, largely for symbolic and traditional reasons. 1. At the primitive level the most prevalent and usually the earliest type of constructed shelter, whether a tent, pit house, earth lodge, or thatched cabin, was more or less circular in plan and covered by necessity with a curved roof. Therefore, in many parts of the ancient world the domical shape became habitually associated in men's memories with a central type of structure which was venerated as a tribal and ancestral shelter, a cosmic symbol, a house of appearances and a ritualistic abode. 2. Hence many widely separate cultures, whose architecture evolved from primitive methods of construction, had some tradition of an ancient and revered shelter which was distinguished by a curved roof, usually more or less domical in appearance, but sometimes hoop-shaped or conical."
  3. ^ Smith 1950, p. 5: "To the naive eye of men uninterested in construction, the dome, it must be realized, was first of all a shape and then an idea. As a shape (which antedated the beginnings of masonry construction), It was the memorable feature of an ancient, ancestral house. It is still a shape visualized and described by such terms as hemisphere, beehive, onion, melon, and bulbous. In ancient times it was thought of as a tholos, pine cone, omphalos, helmet, tegurium, kubba, kalube, maphalia, vihdra, parasol, amalaka tree, cosmic egg, and heavenly bowl. While the modern terms are purely descriptive, the ancient imagery both preserved some memory of the origin of the domical shape and conveyed something of the ancestral beliefs and supernatural meanings associated with its form."
  4. ^ Downey 1946, pp. 23, 25, 26: "Architectural historians who deal with the history of the dome have been baffled and sometimes led astray by the peculiar vague-ness of some of the literary passages which in some cases form the only evidence for the existence of certain domes or of certain types of domes. When the ancient authors mention a dome, they often call it a sphaira or a sphairion. While inexact, in the geometrical sense, this is a perfectly comprehensible and justifiable method of describing an architectural element whose most prominent characteristic is its sphericity; and that the ancient writers were aware of the inexactitude, but also aware of the usefulness of the graphic image, is suggested by Procopius' reference to the main dome of the Church of the Apostles at Constantinople as τὸ σφαιροειδές, which might be translated "the sphere-like structure."" [...] "Choricius, to the writer's present knowledge, is the only writer of this period who is careful enough to note that a dome or a semi-dome is a hollow spherical form." [...] "Naturally, if one wished to describe a dome vividly, the most arresting feature of its appearance was its sphericity, and everybody knew that if you called a dome a sphaira, you called it this because it resembled a sphaira; and it was understood that a dome was not a sphaira in the geometrical sense. This is of course what one would expect, and the phenomenon is by no means confined to post-classical Greek literature."
  5. ^ a b Mainstone 2000, p. 1: "Architecturally, the dome may be seen not only as a structure but also as shelter, spatial enclosure, silhouette, or symbolic form with divers connotations stemming from past uses. To review all these aspects of its history would be impossible in a brief survey."
  6. ^ Smith 1950, pp. 8–9: "The most primitive and natural shape, derived directly from a round hut made of pliable materials tied together at the top and covered with leaves, skins or thatch, was the pointed and slightly bulbous dome which is so common today among the backward tribes of Nubia and Africa (Fig. 93). This type of dome, resembling a truncated pine cone or beehive, is preserved in the tholos tombs of the Mediterranean (Fig. 63), the rock-cut tombs of Etruria and Sicily (Figs. 64, 65), in the Syrian qubab huts (Fig. 88), on the tomb of Bizzos (Fig. 61) and on many of the early Islamic mosques (Figs. 38–43). To distinguish this shape of dome from the geometric cone we will call it conoid, because of its recognized likeness to the actual pine cone. Other types of domical shapes, flatter and unpointed, were derived from the tent and preserved as tabernacles, ciboria and baldachins (Figs. 144–151). These tent forms, however, could be puffed-up and bulbous owing to the light framework of the roof, as is shown by the celestial baldachin above the great altar of Zeus at Pergamum (Fig. 106) and the Parthian dome among the reliefs of the arch of Septimius Severus at Rome (Fig. 228). There were also in Syria and other parts of the Roman Empire sacred rustic shelters whose ritualistic and domical coverings sometimes had an outward curving flange at the bottom of the dome as the thatch was bent out to form an overhang (Figs. 111–117). In other examples the curve of their light domical roof was broken by the horizontal bindings which held the thatch in place (Fig. 10). The hemispherical shape, which is today so commonly associated with the dome, undoubtedly acquired its geometric curve largely from the theoretical interests of the Greek mathematicians and the practical considerations of Roman mechanics. This Roman standardization of the domical shape, which made it easier to construct accurately in brick, stone and concrete, became the customary form of the antique domical vault."
  7. ^ a b Dodge 1984, pp. 265–267: "Domes have been the subject of controversy for more than a century. The origins of dome construction and the ways in which it was applied have both been heatedly debated In the light of this, two questions arise. Have some scholars made too much of these matters, thereby creating unnecessary problems and a false controversy? And was there really any 'problem' as regards the dome and the square bay? The underlying issue, however, is that of terminology. Respected scholars have plunged into the debate, only to confuse the situation further by the omission of an adequate definition of terms. Where definitions are given, they are either inconsistent through the text, or do not correspond to those in general use. This leads to confusion, misunderstanding and 'problems with domes'. One thing that most scholars agree upon is that the dome is a kind of vault. R. J. Mainstone defines a dome as
    "A spanning space-enclosing structural element circular in plan and commonly hemispherical or nearly so in total form".
    R. Krautheimer defines it as "a hemispherical vault" and the Penguin Dictionary of Architecture gives the following definition
    "A vault of even curvature erected on a circular base. The section can be segmental, semicircular, pointed or bulbous".
    Thus it emerges that the term 'dome' is non-specific, a blanket-word to describe an hemispherical or similar spanning element. When such a vault is placed on a circular wall, as in the Pantheon in Rome, the 'Temple of Mercury' at Bala or the Tor de'Schiavi on the Via Praenestina, there is little disagreement or variation in the term applied to the roofing element; it is a dome. Problems start to occur in recent critical literature when such an element is placed over an octagonal, polygonal or square bay."
  8. ^ Dodge 1984, pp. 268–270: "The Penguin Dictionary of Architecture gives the following definition of a 'domical vault':
    "A vault rising direct on a square or polygonal base, the curved surfaces separated by groins".
    In American and some British publications this feature is called a 'cloister vault' and this has given rise to some of the terminological confusion. However, both Mainstone and Krautheimer, who both use the term 'cloister vault', do point out that it is also called a domical vault. Mainstone's definition is:
    "A vault approximating to the dome but polygonal rather than circular in plan";
    and Krautheimer's definition is:
    "A vault composed of four, eight or twelve curved surfaces, as would result from the interpenetration of two, four or six barrel-vaults of equal height and diameter; also four-sided, eight-sided, etc, dome".
    These two definitions exactly describe the Domus Augstana [sic] and Bostra examples. Rivoira'a [sic] definition of the Domus Aurea dome demonstrates how unnecessarily convoluted some terms get. He refers to it as a 'cloister vault dome'. He also calls the domical vault 'the ungroined cloister dome'. The term domical vault can be applied to such a vault on a square base, that is, made up of four panels, as Krautheimer points out. It is with this particular kind of domical vault that even more acute problems of definition have arisen in the past. Butler, in his description of the South Baths at Bostra, calls the octagonal dome, referred to above, an 'eight-sided dome'. The two square rooms of the complex (R and T on Butler's plan) were also vaulted. That over room R is still intact and Butler refers to it as a 'cloistered vault' or a 'square dome'. The first term, as already demonstrated, is the American term for the domical vault, but by its qualification as a square dome has caused some scholars to make some rather misguided statements. Ward-Perkins refers to the structure as a domical vault. Creswell refers to the 'square dome of the Praetorium at Musmiye (ancient Phaena), at the same time giving the French and German terms, voute en arc de cloître and klosterküppel. It is obvious from these that he means the domical or cloister vault. However, Swift calls this kind of vault "the so-called cloister dome on a square plan". By this definition it becomes obvious what kind of structure he is referring to, and he also gives Musmiye as an example."
  9. ^ a b Chilton 2000, p. 131: "In the mind of an engineer a dome is structure with a very distinct behavior. It is a synclastically-curved, three dimensional surface, primarily stressed in compression under its own weight and applied loading, and made of a material resistant to such forces (usually masonry or some form of concrete). Circumferential tension forces that may occur at the base of a dome are usually resisted by a tension ring. However, a dictionary definition of the word dome may be less precise. For instance, in a typical concise dictionary a dome is defined as: -
    'dome, n., & v.t.l. Stately building, mansion, (poet.); rounded vault as roof, with circular, elliptical or polygonal base, large cupola; natural vault, canopy, (of sky, trees, etc.); rounded summit of hill etc.; hence domed, domic(al), dome-like, domy. 2. v.t. Cover with, shape as, dome. [F. f. It. duomo cathedral, dome, (& direct) f. L domus house]'
    In the past the stately building often had a masonry dome whereas, due to the rapid expansion in structural systems that have become available in the 20th century, this is now less likely to be the case. This has led to many modern large-span structures being described as domes when their primary load-bearing system does not exactly accord with the engineering definition. Some actually work almost entirely in tension, although they still may be more or less dome-shaped (for example the Millennium Dome in Greenwich). This paper, therefore, addresses the conflict that now exists between the precise engineering and more general dictionary definitions of the term dome by reviewing the development of various types of lightweight and tensile domes during the 20th century."
  10. ^ Osborne 2004, p. 11: "While dome has become the most used English geometric and architectural term for "a large hemispherical, approximately hemispherical or spheroidal vault" (Delbridge, 1981), cupola is the older term."
  11. ^ Saylor 1994, p. 56: "dome, a hemispherical roof form."
  12. ^ Parker 2003: "Definition dome [ARCHITECTURE] A hemispherical roof."
  13. ^ Gorse, Johnston & Pritchard 2012, p. 115: "dome 1. A structure that has a hemispherical roof. 2. A curved layer of rock strata, formed by an upward fold."
  14. ^ Coates, Brooker & Stone 2009, p. 76: "A dome is a structural element conventionally used to cover large spaces. It is defined as an arch that has been rotated around its vertical axis."
  15. ^ Guedes 2016, p. 174: "The dome may be regarded as the three-dimensional counterpart of the arch. In its true circular form, a vertical arch is rotated around a vertical axis and sweeps out, at every level, a continuous circular horizontal ring. Loads can be transmitted both along the meridian lines of the vertical arches and around the horizontal rings."
  16. ^ Palmer 2016, p. 123: "The dome, which is created from an arch turned on its axis 360 degrees, is traditionally considered one of the most important Ancient Roman architectural inventions."
  17. ^ Dodge 1984, p. 277: "Dome A vault of usually even curvature erected on a circular base whose elements are set radially rather than corbelled. The profile can vary. The term can be applied in a general way to other domical forms (Such as the domical and sail vault)"
  18. ^ a b Trachtenberg & Hyman 1986, p. 583: "Dome A curved vault that is erected on a circular base and that is semicircular, pointed, or bulbous in section. If raised over a square or polygonal base transitional squinches or pendentives must be inserted at the corners of the base to transform it into a near circle."
  19. ^ a b Fleming, Honour & Pevsner 1991, pp. 126–127: "Dome. Vault of even curvature on a circular base. The section can be segmental, semicircular, pointed, or bulbous. If a dome is to be erected on a square base, members must be interpolated at the corners to mediate between the square and the circle. They can be pendentives of squinches. A pendentive is a spherical triangle; its curvature is that of a dome whose diameter is the diagonal is the diagonal of the initial square. The triangle is carried to the height which allows the erection on its top horizontal of the dome proper. A squinch is either an arch or arches of increasing radius projecting one in front of the other, or horizontal arches projecting in the same manner. If squinches are placed in the corners of the square and enough arches are erected on them they will result in a suitable base-line for the dome. In all these cases the dome will have the diameter of the length of one side of the square. It can be placed direct on the circular base-line, when this is achieved, or a drum, usually with windows, can be interpolated. If the dome has no drum and is segmental, it is called a saucer dome. If it has no drum and is semicircular, it is called a calotte. Another method of developing a dome out of a square is to take the diagonal of the square as the diameter of the dome. In this case the dome starts as if by pendentives, but their curvature is then continued without any break. Such domes are called sail vaults, because they resemble a sail with the four corners fixed and the wind blowing into it. A domical vault is not a dome proper. If on a square base, four webs (cells) rise to a point separated by groins (see vault). The same can be done on a polygonal base. An umbrella, parachute, pumpkin or melon dome is a dome on a circular base, but also divided into individual webs, each of which, however, has a base-line curved segmentally in plan and curved in elevation."
  20. ^ a b Curl 2003, p. 220: "A domical vault is not a true dome. A dome is a vault with a segmental, semicircular, bulbous, or pointed section rising from a circular base."
  21. ^ a b Ambrose, Harris & Stone 2008, p. 41: "A concave structural element, erected on a circular base, and usually the shape of a semi-sphere. A dome has a curved surface and functions much like an arch, but provides support in all directions. Larger domes often have two or even three layers: the top and bottom are decorative, while the centre layer is structural and supports the other two. Domes can be segmental, semicircular, pointed or bulbous."
  22. ^ a b Clarke 2010, p. 79: "dome A vault of even curvature over a circular base; the section can be segmental, semicircular, pointed, or bulbous. If a vault is erected over a square base, squinches or pendentives must be inserted at the corners to connect the dome to the base."
  23. ^ Ching 2011, p. 62: "A vaulted structure having a circular plan and usually the form of a portion of a sphere, so constructed as to exert an equal thrust in all directions."
  24. ^ a b Burden 2012, p. 155: "Dome: a curved roof structure that spans an area on a circular base, producing an equal thrust in all directions. A cross section of the dome can be semicircular, pointed, or segmented."
  25. ^ Kurtz 2004, p. 378: "Dome" [...] "1. A construction in the form of a spherical cap realized on a circular or polygonal plan. 2. The internal surface of a dome. Syn. with CUPOLA. 3. A surface of revolution generated by any meridian curve turning around a vertical axis. Horizontal sections are circular rings and the dome picks up on its bearings by a circular belt. 4. Syn, with CAVITY; OPEN; POT-HOLE"
  26. ^ Ching, Jarzombek & Prakash 2007, p. 761: "A vaulted structure having a circular or polygonal plan and usually the form of a portion of a sphere, so constructed so as to exert an equal thrust in all directions."
  27. ^ Davies & Jokiniemi 2008, p. 118: "Dome 1 a hollow, flattened or raised hemispherical roof structure, often of masonry, which rests on a circular, square, or polygonal base. See below. See types of dome illustration. See classical temple illustration. bulbous dome, see onion dome. drum dome. glass dome. half dome. melon dome, see umbrella dome. onion dome. parachute dome, see umbrella dome. pendentive dome. pumpkin dome, see umbrella dome. sail dome, sail vault. saucer dome. semi dome, see half dome. umbrella dome. 2 see domelight."
  28. ^ a b Parker 2012, p. 90: "Cupola (Ital.), a concave ceiling, either hemispherical or of any other curve, covering a circular or polygonal area; also a roof, the exterior of which is either one of these forms, usually called a dome, and in Latin tholus."
  29. ^ Davies & Jokiniemi 2012, p. 143: "Dome 1 a hollow, flattened or raised hemispherical roof structure, often of masonry, which rests on a circular, square, or polygonal base. See Types included as separate entries are listed below: bulbous dome, see onion dome; drum dome; half dome; melon dome, see umbrella dome; onion dome; parachute dome, see umbrella dome; pendentive dome; pumpkin dome, see umbrella dome; sail dome, sail vault; saucer dome; semi dome, see half dome; umbrella dome. 2 see domelight."
  30. ^ Cowan & Smith 1998, p. 73: "A vault of double curvature, both curves being convex upwards. Most domes are portions of a sphere; however, it is possible to have a dome of non-spherical curvature on a circular plan, or to have a dome on a non-circular plan, such as an ellipse, an oval or a rectangle."
  31. ^ a b McNeil 2002, p. 879: "A dome is a convex rounded roof covering the whole or a part of a building with a base on the horizontal plane which is circular, elliptical or polygonal. In vertical section the dome may be hemispherical, partly elliptical, saucer-shaped, or formed like a bulb (the so-called onion domes to be seen in eastern Europe)."
  32. ^ a b Curl & Wilson 2015, pp. 236–237: "Cupola, essentially a species of vault, constructed on a circular, elliptical, or polygonal plan, bulbous, segmental, semicircular, or pointed in vertical section. It can be built on top of a structure the plan of which is identical to that of the dome: if that structure's wall is circular or elliptical it is a drum (often pierced with windows) as in a rotunda. However, domes usually provide cover for a square- or rectangular-planned building or compartment, so adjustments are made to facilitate the transition from the square to the circular, elliptical, or polygonal base of the cupola or dome. This is achieved by means of pendentives (fragments of a sail-vault, resembling a species of concave, distorted, almost triangular spandrels, rising up from the corner at the top of the right-angled compartment to the circular or elliptical base of the drum or cupola) or squinches (small arch or series of parallel arches of increasing radius spanning the angle of the square compartment). Both the drum and cupola will have a diameter the same dimension as the side of the square on which the whole structure stands. Types of dome include: calotte: low cupola or saucer dome of segmental vertical section, like a skull-cap; cloister-vault: as domical vault; domical vault: cloister-vault, not a true dome, but formed of four or more (depending on the shape of the base) cells or webs forming groins where they touch vertically and rising to a point; melon: as parachute; Pantheon: low dome on the exterior, often stepped, resembling that of the Pantheon in Rome, and coffered on the interior, widely copied by Neo-Classical architects; parachute: melon, pumpkin, or umbrella dome standing on a scalloped circular base and formed of individual webs, segmental on plan, joined on groins or ribs. Each web has a concave interior and convex exterior so it resembles a parachute, rather than an umbrella; pumpkin: as parachute; sail dome: dome resembling a billowing sail over a square compartment with its diameter the same dimension as the diagonal instead of the side of the square below, enabling the structure to rise as though on pendentives but continuing without interruption. Pendentives are really part of a sail-dome and themselves are a species of sail-vault; umbrella: as parachute."
  33. ^ Heyman 1997, p. 27: "A dome is a rounded vault forming a roof over a large interior space." [...] "The rounded vault of the dome can take many forms. Perhaps the simplest of these is a shell of revolution, in which every horizontal section is circular; an egg in an egg-cup is a shell of this kind."
  34. ^ Mainstone 2000, p. 1: "Structurally, I take the term dome to denote, as it normally does, a doubly curved form supported from below and acting primarily in arching compression as it spans the space it encloses."
  35. ^ a b Harris 2005, p. 319: "Dome 1. A curved roof structure spanning an area; often hemispherical in shape. 2. A square prefabricated pan form; used in two-way joist (waffle) concrete floor construction. 3. A vault substantially hemispherical in shape, but sometimes slightly pointed or bulbous; a ceiling of similar form. Also see geodesic dome and saucer dome."
  36. ^ a b Brett 2012, p. 20: "Dome a vaulted roof; normally circular or polygonal in plan and semicircular, segmental or pointed in section. See also Cupola and Squinch."
  37. ^ Hourihane 2012, p. 301: "Rounded vault covering an interior space. A very small dome roof, for example a lantern mounted on the eye of a dome proper (e.g. St Paul's Cathedral, London), is known as a cupola. In Italian cupola is used for a monumental dome." [...] "A dome can either be composed of curved segments or be a shell of revolution. The dome at Florence Cathedral by Filippo Brunelleschi (1377–1446) is segmental, octangular at every section. A shell of revolution is generated by rotating an arch about a vertical central axis. To produce a hemispherical surface the arch will be semicircular, but and shape of arch, similarly rotated, will give rise to a shell of revolution; and every horizontal cross-section is still circular. The simplest form of dome is that of such a shell of revolution: for example, the inner masonry dome of St Paul's Cathedral is roughly hemispherical, and has an open eye, while the main dome is conical; but both are shells of revolution, as is the surface of the timber outer dome. A dome can have either a single or a double shell."
  38. ^ a b Harris 2013: "Dome 1. A curved roof structure spanning an area; often hemispherical in shape. 2. A vault substantially hemispherical in shape, but sometimes slightly pointed or bulbous; a ceiling of similar form."
  39. ^ a b Murray, Murray & Jones 2013, p. 151: "dome A structure that can be either circular in plan, or oval, hexagonal, octagonal, or a combination of these forms. It may have a high profile, or hemispherical, or flattened."
  40. ^ Palmisano & Totaro 2010, p. 519: "The absence of a common language is one of the reasons why nowadays there is a very big gap between the Architect and the Engineer. The introduction of new materials and techniques during the Industrial Revolution and the born of the first polytechnics in the 18th century, led to a different cultural approach to the design causing the born of different languages between Architects and Engineers. Nowadays, with the widespread of very complicated works of the architecture there is a huge need to bridge the gap between Architects and Engineers. In this context, focusing the attention on masonry domes, this paper aims at highlighting that Load Path Method seems to open new prospects in the search for a common language between engineers and architects to give voice, in harmony and in a single design, to formal, aesthetical, functional and structural aspects. According to LPM, a dome can be seen as a system of meridian arches joined by the parallel circles. The arches draw the paths of the vertical loads while the parallel circles draw the paths of the unbalanced thrusts. In fact, differently from the arches, in dome the equilibrium of the thrusts in every node is always possible because of the presence of the parallels."
  41. ^ a b Chilton 2000, p. 143: "Although the name 'dome' was appropriately applied (in the strict engineering sense) to historical long-span structures of synclastic form, working in compression and using heavy materials with little tensile strength, this is not correct for many of the new lightweight structural systems. However, the name 'dome' in common usage has come to refer to almost any long-span roofing system. The answer, therefore, to the question posed in the title of this paper is "It depends!". A synclastic surface acting predominantly in compression is clearly a dome by name, by form and by engineering definition, whilst a structure acting mainly in tension (such as the Georgia Dome) is a dome in name alone. Between these extremes there are many shades of distinction."
  42. ^ Jannasch 2016, pp. 745–746: "A funicular masonry dome experiences no hoop stresses, whether tensile or compressive, so it is always on the verge of bursting. Shallow spheric domes maintain compressive stresses in each course and are therefore more stable than the "ideal" funicular form. Viable non-funicular domes also include Herrero's flat vault at the Escorial, and Mackenzie's 1840 concept of an inverted fan vault." [...] "Masonry domes are often explained as free-standing arches rotated around a central axis, or as half-arches swept between a tension ring at the base and an ocular compression ring at the top. Such concepts aren't entirely inaccurate, but they are far from complete. They undervalue or ignore the circumferential compression in each course upon which the rising dome depends and which remains active in many completed structures. They also tend to ignore the vertical shear resistance that prevents inner and upper portions of the dome from crashing vertically down through outer and lower portions, and the horizontal shear resistance that allows lower parts of the dome to contain the thrust of upper parts. Visualizing the dome as a rotated arch implies that the bedding faces between subsequent courses of masonry need to be more or less normal to the section, which is the case in an arch, but not the case in a dome. Lastly, free-standing arches must be thick enough to contain their funicular. This is not true of domes. That the arch and funicular don't really explain of the structural behavior of domes should be clear from real world examples. The conical domes at Pisa and elsewhere, for example, the shallow domes of Byzantium, and the circular vaults at the Escorial are far from funicular. None of them would succeed if "un-rotated" into arches."

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A dome is a curved architectural structure, typically hemispherical, that serves as a roof or ceiling, evolving from the arch to enclose space efficiently while distributing weight evenly across its base. This form, often constructed from materials like stone, brick, concrete, or modern frameworks, symbolizes the heavens in many cultures due to its upward-curving shape and ability to span large areas without internal supports. Domes have been integral to religious, civic, and residential buildings worldwide, with variations including corbelled, vaulted, pendentive, and geodesic types that adapt to different engineering needs and aesthetic goals. The history of domes traces back to the ancient Near East and Egypt around 3000 BCE, where corbelled domes—built by layering progressively smaller courses of stone or brick inward—were used in tombs and small structures like beehive huts. The Romans advanced dome construction dramatically in the 2nd century CE, employing concrete to create monumental examples such as the Pantheon in Rome, whose unreinforced dome spans 43.2 meters in diameter and remained the largest of its kind for over 1,300 years. In the Byzantine era, architects innovated with pendentives—triangular curved segments that transition a square base to a circular dome—enabling grand structures like the Hagia Sophia (completed 537 CE), where the dome's design allowed light to filter through, evoking a celestial realm. During the Renaissance, Filippo Brunelleschi revived large-scale dome building without temporary wooden centering, constructing the octagonal dome of Florence Cathedral (Santa Maria del Fiore) from 1420 to 1436 using a self-supporting herringbone brick pattern that spanned 45.5 meters. This engineering feat influenced subsequent European architecture, including Baroque and neoclassical designs. In the 20th century, R. Buckminster Fuller popularized the geodesic dome, a lightweight, triangulated spherical structure that maximizes strength and enclosure with minimal materials, as seen in the 1967 Montreal Expo's U.S. Pavilion. Today, domes continue to appear in stadiums, observatories, and sustainable buildings, blending historical symbolism with advanced materials like steel and composites.

Terminology

Etymology

The English word "dome" derives from the Latin domus, meaning "house," which in extended to domus denoting a church or . This evolved through Italian duomo, referring to a as the "house of God," and then entered Middle French as dôme or domme, signifying a domed church or vaulted structure. By the mid-16th century, the term appeared in English, initially in a 1553 translation by Gavin Douglas, where it denoted a house, roof, or , before shifting to describe a rounded roof or vault. The linguistic roots trace further to Ancient Greek dōma (δῶμα), meaning "house," "roof," or "housetop," sharing the Proto-Indo-European root dem-, associated with building and enclosure. In architectural contexts, dōma influenced early descriptions of covered structures, and the term's adoption in European languages solidified by the 1650s to specifically indicate a hemispherical or vaulted roof form, distinct from flat or pitched coverings. Over time, the meaning of "dome" narrowed from broad roofing or housing to the precise semicircular or hemispherical vaults seen in cathedrals and public buildings.

Definitions

A dome is defined in architecture as a curved, vaulted roof or ceiling that typically assumes a hemispherical or similar rounded form, spanning an open space over a circular, elliptical, or polygonal base without requiring internal supports. This self-supporting structure relies on compression to distribute loads from the apex outward and downward to the foundation, enabling it to enclose large volumes efficiently. Domes differ from related forms such as arches, vaults, and shells in their dimensionality and spatial enclosure. An arch is a two-dimensional curved element that primarily spans linearly and transfers loads along a single plane, whereas a dome extends this principle into three dimensions by rotating or extending the arch form around a vertical axis, creating a fully enclosed curved surface. Vaults, often considered extensions of arches in a longitudinal direction, form elongated coverings like barrel or groin vaults that do not fully circularly enclose space, unlike the rotational symmetry of domes. Shells, a broader category encompassing thin, curved surfaces under membrane action, include domes but also hyperbolic paraboloids or cylindrical forms; domes specifically feature double curvature (both meridional and hoop) for omnidirectional load distribution. Architectural variations distinguish true domes from pseudo-domes based on construction and curvature. True domes exhibit continuous, smooth curvature achieved through voussoir masonry or monolithic forms, where the surface follows a geometric curve like a hemisphere or paraboloid from base to apex. In contrast, pseudo-domes, also known as corbelled or false domes, approximate the dome shape through stepped or overlapping horizontal layers that inwardly project without true arch action, resulting in a polygonal or faceted profile rather than seamless continuity. In modern engineering, domes are classified by their primary stress mechanisms, encompassing both compressive and tensile structures. Traditional masonry domes operate predominantly in compression, similar to arches, where gravitational forces maintain stability through mutual wedging of elements. Contemporary tensile domes, however, utilize membranes or cables in tension—often with lightweight fabrics, ETFE, or steel frameworks—to achieve spanning capabilities, particularly in large-scale or temporary applications, while hybrid designs combine tensile elements with compressive supports for enhanced efficiency.

Structural Components

Elements

The basic structural components of a dome include the drum, pendentives or squinches, oculus, ribs, and lantern, each contributing to the overall stability and form of the enclosing envelope. The drum, also known as the tholobate or tambour, forms the cylindrical base that supports the dome, elevating it above the supporting walls to create a circular foundation for the curved shell. This component provides a stable platform that aligns the dome's geometry with the underlying structure, often constructed from materials like masonry to bear vertical loads effectively. Pendentives and squinches serve as transitional elements that bridge the gap between a square or polygonal base and the circular plan of the dome above. Pendentives are curved, triangular segments formed by arching over the corners of a square support, concentrating loads onto the piers below while smoothly converting the base shape. Squinches, in contrast, consist of stepped or arched horizontal elements placed over the corners, similarly functioning to support and transition the geometry by distributing weight to the walls. The oculus is a central circular opening at the apex of the dome, which admits into the interior and reduces the overall weight by removing material from the top, thereby aiding in load distribution to the supporting walls. are reinforcing arches integrated into the dome's surface, typically radiating from the base to the , that help distribute across the and maintain its under load. The lantern is an upper decorative structure positioned atop the dome, often enclosing windows or openings to further illuminate the interior while capping the assembly and adding vertical emphasis. These elements interlock sequentially to form a cohesive envelope: the drum rises from the transition provided by pendentives or squinches, upon which the ribbed dome shell is erected, topped by the oculus and optionally crowned by a lantern, ensuring loads are progressively transferred downward through interconnected masonry or arched joints for structural integrity.

Materials

Domes have historically relied on traditional materials prized for their compressive strength and availability. Concrete, often faced with brick or stone, was the primary material used in Roman-era domes for its durability and ability to form stable, load-bearing structures, as in the Pantheon. Brick became a staple in Byzantine construction, offering a lighter alternative to stone while maintaining high compressive capacity, as seen in the layered brickwork of structures like Hagia Sophia. Wood served in early temporary domes, providing flexibility for formwork and lightweight assembly in archaic and Etruscan designs. Plaster, often gypsum or lime-based, was applied as a decorative finish to enhance interiors with ornamental reliefs and smooth surfaces. In modern dome construction, materials have shifted toward those enabling larger spans and innovative forms. Reinforced concrete excels in spanning vast areas due to its enhanced tensile properties from embedded steel, allowing thin-shell designs for efficiency. Steel frameworks support tensegrity structures, where cables and struts create self-stabilizing forms with minimal material use. Glass and fiberglass offer lightweight, translucent options for aesthetic and functional domes, transmitting light while resisting weathering. Composites like ETFE, a fluoropolymer film, enable pneumatic cushions that are highly transparent, flexible, and corrosion-resistant for temporary or semi-permanent enclosures. Key properties of these materials influence their selection in dome building, balancing structural demands with practical considerations. Masonry materials like stone and brick exhibit excellent compressive strength—typically around 1,000 psi for —but low tensile strength, about 50 psi, making them suitable for thrust-based designs but vulnerable to tension. In contrast, metals such as provide superior tensile capacity, up to 65,000 psi, alongside comparable compressive strength, enabling slender, high-span elements. Durability varies: stone and brick offer long-term resistance to , often lasting centuries, while requires protective coatings to prevent . Weight comparisons show masonry at roughly 120-140 lbs per , far heavier than 's 490 lbs per but distributed differently; fiberglass and are markedly lighter, under 10 lbs per for panels, reducing foundation loads. As of 2025, construction costs for traditional masonry projects typically range from $100 to $250 per for dome structures, while modern synthetics like can exceed $60 per but offer lower long-term due to longevity and energy efficiency. The evolution of dome materials reflects a post-20th-century transition from heavy masonry to lightweight synthetics, driven by advances in engineering and manufacturing. Early reliance on stone and brick gave way to reinforced concrete in the mid-1900s for its versatility, followed by steel and composites in the late 20th century to achieve greater spans and sustainability. This shift prioritizes reduced material volume and enhanced performance, integrating materials seamlessly with structural elements for optimized load distribution.

Geometry and Mechanics

Shapes

Domes in assume various geometric forms, each defined by distinct profiles that determine their structural and aesthetic qualities. The hemispherical dome, resembling half a , features a uniform from base to apex, providing a smooth, rounded silhouette that maximizes interior volume relative to surface area. Parabolic domes exhibit a curve that steepens upward, generated by rotating a parabola around its axis, resulting in a more pointed profile compared to the hemispherical form. Elliptical domes follow an oval cross-section, with varying radii along the major and minor axes, allowing for elongated or compressed shapes that adapt to non-circular bases. Conical domes taper linearly from a wide base to a narrow apex, forming a straight-sided profile akin to an inverted cone, often seen in spire-like terminations. Key mathematical parameters describe these geometries, including , which quantifies the dome's bending at any point, and the rise-to-span ratio, defined as the height from base to apex divided by the base diameter, influencing stability and proportion. For a hemispherical dome, the surface follows x2+y2+z2=r2x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 where z0z \geq 0 and rr is , representing the upper half of centered at the origin. These metrics enable precise modeling, with lower rise-to-span ratios yielding shallower profiles suitable for expansive enclosures. Variations in dome shapes arise from transitional elements and layered constructions. Squinches, arched segments built across the corners of a square base, create an octagonal transition to support a circular dome, altering the effective curvature at the base. In contrast, pendentives form triangular curved surfaces that smoothly convert the square to a circle, a more fluid geometric shift without intermediate steps. Multi-layered domes often incorporate compound curves, where inner and outer shells follow differing profiles—such as a hemispherical interior with a parabolic exterior—to enhance rigidity and visual complexity. Parabolic shapes offer advantages in load distribution, approximating the funicular surface for uniform vertical loads, which promotes even along the structure and minimizes moments. This geometric efficiency influences the resulting internal forces, allowing for thinner shells under self-weight.

Internal Forces

In domes, the primary internal forces are compressive in nature, with meridional acting along the longitudinal meridians from crown to base and hoop acting circumferentially to resist spreading. Meridional forces increase progressively downward due to the self-weight and any superimposed loads, while hoop forces vary with the dome's and can become tensile in regions where compression alone cannot maintain equilibrium. In thin shell domes, localized tension may develop near the base or under asymmetric loading, and shear forces arise at the interface with supporting elements to balance transverse components. Stability in domes is maintained through mechanisms that manage the outward thrust from compression, such as buttressing via adjacent walls or arches to contain horizontal components. A catenary curve profile enables pure compression by aligning the structure's shape with the natural line of thrust under uniform loading, minimizing or eliminating tension. Thrust line analysis evaluates stability by tracing the path of resultant compressive forces, ensuring it remains within the cross-section to prevent eccentricity-induced . A representative for meridional stress under vertical loading is σm=N2πrhsin2ϕ\sigma_m = \frac{N}{2\pi r h \sin^2\phi} where NN is the total vertical load above the section, rr is the dome , hh is the shell thickness, and ϕ\phi is the meridional angle from the vertical; this derives from equilibrium of forces on a horizontal section, accounting for the parallel circle rsinϕr \sin\phi and the vertical component sinϕ\sin\phi of the meridional . Failure modes in domes include buckling in slender configurations, where compressive stresses exceed critical thresholds leading to sudden lateral deformation. Cracking often results from uneven foundation settlement, inducing differential movements that generate unintended tensile stresses and propagate fractures along meridians or hoops.

Cultural and Physical Properties

Symbolism

Domes have long served as universal symbols of the heavens or cosmos across diverse cultures, often evoking the celestial vault that encompasses the earth. Their unbroken, continuous curve is interpreted as a representation of eternity, suggesting an infinite, cyclical existence without beginning or end. This form draws from ancient perceptions of the sky as a protective, domed enclosure, fostering a sense of awe and connection to the divine or natural order. In religious contexts, domes carry profound spiritual significance. Within Christianity, the dome in churches symbolizes the vault of heaven, illustrating the biblical narrative of creation where God separated the heavens from the earth, with the structure's apex pointing toward divine transcendence. Similarly, in Islamic architecture, domes over mosques represent divine unity and the encompassing nature of God, creating a spatial metaphor for the unity of the ummah (community) under the divine will and bridging the earthly realm with the heavenly. Cultural interpretations of domes vary, reflecting societal values and power structures. In ancient Roman architecture, the dome of the Pantheon embodied imperial authority and the cosmos, serving as a microcosm of the under the emperor's oversight, with its oculus allowing celestial to affirm the ruler's divine legitimacy. In Buddhist traditions, the dome of the signifies enlightenment and the universe, housing relics and symbolizing the Buddha's realization of ultimate truth, with its rounded form evoking the wholeness of the and the path to spiritual awakening. In modern interpretations, particularly with domes popularized by , the structure embodies utopian ideals of efficiency and harmony with nature, representing a sustainable future where human ingenuity aligns with ecological principles to create self-sufficient, resilient communities.

Acoustics

Domes exhibit unique acoustic properties due to their curved geometries, which influence through focusing, , and effects. In hemispherical or circular domes, waves incident on the inner surface at grazing angles can follow the curvature via multiple reflections, enabling phenomena like whispering galleries where low-level , such as , are audible at distant points along the perimeter. This focusing arises from the geometry's to channel tangentially, as first mathematically described by Rayleigh for structures like St. Paul's Cathedral dome. Conversely, irregular or multifaceted dome surfaces promote by scattering in multiple directions, reducing specular reflections and potentially improving spatial uniformity. Reverberation in domes is governed by the interplay of volume and absorption, quantified by Sabine's formula for reverberation time T=0.161VAT = 0.161 \frac{V}{A}, where VV is the enclosed volume in cubic meters and AA is the total sound absorption in square meters (sabins). This metric indicates how long sound persists after the source ceases, often prolonged in large, hard-surfaced domes due to low absorption, leading to echoes that enhance auditory immersion but can impair intelligibility if excessive. In dome-coupled spaces, such as those in mosques, the formula helps predict how dome height and curvature extend decay times, amplifying vocal elements like recitations. Similarly, St. Paul's Cathedral in London features a whispering gallery within its dome, producing spatial audio effects where sounds propagate circumferentially, creating an immersive, three-dimensional auditory experience that enhances choral performances and organ music through coupled subspaces. These examples illustrate how dome acoustics can symbolically support rituals, such as prayer amplification in sacred spaces. Modern dome design incorporates damping materials, like porous absorbers or perforated panels, to mitigate excessive reverberation and achieve balanced decay times suitable for speech or music. Computational modeling techniques, including ray-tracing and finite element methods, enable simulation of sound fields in proposed dome structures, optimizing geometry for concert halls by predicting focusing hotspots and diffusion patterns. Challenges persist in irregular dome shapes, where curved surfaces can cause uneven sound distribution, resulting in hot spots of high intensity and shadowed areas of low coverage, complicating uniform audience experiences.

Types

Beehive Dome

The beehive dome, also known as a corbelled dome, is an early form of vaulted roof constructed by stacking horizontal courses of stone or other materials that progressively overhang inward, creating a false dome without true arching. This technique relies on the weight of each layer compressing the one below, forming a conical or beehive shape that narrows to an apex often capped by a single stone. Characteristic examples include the Mycenaean tholos tombs of the Late Bronze Age, such as the at , where corbelled domes achieved spans typically limited to about 10 meters, though exceptional cases exceeded 14 meters in diameter. These structures demonstrate stability through careful layering but are inherently limited in scale due to the accumulating inward forces. The form also appears in prehistoric and , such as the dry-stone clocháns or beehive huts of early medieval , which use similar corbelling for small-scale dwellings spanning just a few meters. A key advantage of the beehive dome is its simplicity, requiring no temporary centering or formwork during construction, which made it accessible for prehistoric builders using local materials like stone or mud-brick. This method allowed for durable, self-supporting roofs in resource-limited settings, as seen in both monumental tombs and everyday vernacular structures. However, the design imposes limitations, including a steep profile that concentrates inward , necessitating thick walls or external earthen mounds to prevent . Such constraints restricted spans and influenced the of more efficient true domes in later architectural traditions.

Braced Dome

A braced dome is a space frame structure consisting of a grid of intersecting ribs, trusses, or cables and compression struts that form a skeletal framework to support large spans without intermediate columns. This configuration often incorporates meridional arches or ribs joined by horizontal rings and diagonal bracing elements, creating a rigid lattice that can span rises from as low as one-sixth to three-quarters of the dome's diameter. Infill panels, such as glazing or cladding, are typically added to enclose the space while maintaining the lightweight nature of the system. These domes are widely applied in venues requiring vast, unobstructed interiors, including sports arenas and exhibition halls, where their modular grid allows for adaptation to irregular site plans and geometries. For instance, the in , completed in 1992, employs a cable-net braced system to cover an expansive 233 by 186 meters, serving as a for and other events. In terms of mechanics, the bracing counters torsional, wind, and seismic forces by efficiently distributing stresses across the framework, with tension members like cables providing lateral stability and compression elements handling vertical loads. Hybrid designs integrate tensioned membranes, such as Teflon-coated fabric, for enclosure, reducing weight and enabling translucent roofing that enhances natural lighting. Post-1950s innovations in braced domes arose from advancements in tensile and technologies, notably the tensegrity-type cable dome developed by structural engineer David H. Geiger in the , which combines minimal compression struts with a dense cable network for unprecedented spans. This system debuted at the Pavilion for in and influenced subsequent large-scale applications, emphasizing material efficiency and form-finding through prestress. Unlike variants that rely on polyhedral , braced domes prioritize the internal framing for load-bearing capacity.

Cloister Vault

The vault represents a specialized variant of domical vaulting in , characterized by a series of intersecting cylindrical vaults that radiate from a central oculus, creating a star-like overhead. This design employs concave cylindrical surfaces—essentially segments of barrel vaults—that converge at the crown, forming a compact, dome-like covering over a typically square or polygonal base. The orients these vaults at 45-degree angles relative to the primary structural axes of the supporting walls, allowing the intersections to produce diagonal groins that enhance both stability and visual complexity. Historically, cloister vaults found prominent application in , particularly within monastic complexes where they roofed the covered walkways encircling courtyards. Exemplified in structures like the cloisters (constructed circa 1324–1350), these vaults efficiently spanned the relatively narrow widths of such passages, typically 10 to 15 feet, without requiring extensive centering during construction. Their use declined after the late Gothic period but remains a hallmark of English style innovations in vaulting. Key advantages of the cloister vault include its capacity to admit through the central oculus and adjacent arcade openings, illuminating the walkway while shielding from weather. Additionally, the exposed ribbing along the vault intersections serves decorative purposes, often elaborately profiled to form intricate star motifs that enrich the aesthetic without compromising structural integrity. This form bears a brief resemblance to crossed-arch domes in its reliance on intersecting curved elements for load distribution.

Compound Dome

A compound dome consists of multiple layered or segmented shells, typically featuring an inner shell that supports the primary structural load and an outer shell that provides aesthetic enhancement or , with an intervening space for insulation, ventilation, or decorative elements. This design allows for the separation of functional and ornamental roles, where the inner shell maintains the interior volume while the outer shell can adopt more elaborate profiles. In , double-shell configurations were employed in structures like the in , where the octagonal form utilized dual shells to achieve stability and visual grandeur over a centralized plan. The benefits of compound domes include reduced overall weight through the use of lighter materials in the outer shell, improved thermal control via the air gap that minimizes , and the capacity for taller, more imposing profiles without compromising interior space. These advantages also enhance seismic resilience, as the decoupled shells distribute forces more effectively during earthquakes, a critical feature in regions prone to tectonic activity. Additionally, the design facilitates intricate exterior ornamentation, such as tilework or bulbous contours, while preserving a smooth interior surface. Examples of compound domes often appear in multi-layer forms, such as the discontinuous double-shell dome of the Shah Mosque (Imam Mosque) in , , where the inner shell rises steeply and the outer shell curves outward for a dynamic . typically proceeds from the base upward: the and inner shell are erected first using or centering to support the , followed by the outer shell, which is built independently to allow for variations and decorative finishes. In Persian styles, variations include onion-like layering with triple shells or graduated segments that create a stepped, bulbous appearance, as seen in the dome of the Friday Mosque in . This layering in Persian compound domes influenced the development of bulbous shapes in later Islamic and Russian architecture.

Crossed-Arch Dome

A crossed-arch dome is a specialized form of ribbed vault in which slender arches intersect to create a network of ribs that support infill panels, forming a curved over a typically polygonal base. This structural type emerged in the mid-10th century in , with the earliest documented examples appearing in the Great Mosque of Córdoba during the reign of , marking it as one of the pioneering ribbed dome designs. The intersecting arches provide both structural efficiency and visual intricacy, distinguishing it from earlier solid masonry domes by reducing material use while allowing for expansive interior spaces. Construction involves erecting arches that not only at right angles but often in more complex patterns, intertwining to delineate polygonal or star-shaped openings in the plan and transitioning smoothly to the dome's three-dimensional curvature. These , usually constructed from cut stone or , frame thin panels that can be filled with plaster, lightweight infill, or decorative elements like honeycombing; the process begins from the base, using temporary centering for the arches before completing the panels. This method is well-suited to polygonal bases, such as octagons, where squinches or transitional elements facilitate the shift from flat walls to the curved vault. As a precursor to more elaborate Gothic rib vaults, it demonstrates early experimentation with skeletal framing over solid . The geometry features groin-like intersections where the arches meet, generating a series of curved panels that radiate outward, often deriving from octagonal layouts to achieve harmonious proportions in both and . Stability is achieved through the arches channeling compressive forces and thrusts directly to discrete support points at the base, such as columns or piers, minimizing lateral spread and enabling reliable performance over polygonal supports without excessive buttressing. Structural analyses of surviving examples, including those in , reveal effective load distribution with minimal tensile stresses, confirming their durability; this design supports spans up to approximately 20 meters in evolved forms, though early Islamic instances typically covered 6-8 meter bays. Aesthetically, the exposed serve as a decorative scaffold, accentuating the dome's geometric elegance through visible intersections that can be gilded, painted, or inlaid with mosaics to evoke starry skies or intricate mathematical patterns central to . In the Great Mosque of Córdoba's dome, for instance, the are adorned with radial gold mosaics, blending form and ornament to heighten spiritual ambiance. This emphasis on visible structure not only aids construction visibility but also influenced subsequent vaulting traditions, including brief parallels to vaults in their use of intersecting elements for panel division.

Ellipsoidal Dome

An al dome derives its form from the surface of an , a three-dimensional defined mathematically by (xa)2+(yb)2+(zc)2=1\left( \frac{x}{a} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{y}{b} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{z}{c} \right)^2 = 1, where aa, bb, and cc represent the semi-axes lengths along the respective coordinates. In architectural applications, the dome typically comprises the upper portion of this surface, with elongation achieved by adjusting the axes—such as setting c>a=bc > a = b for a prolate (vertically stretched) form or a=b>ca = b > c for an oblate (flattened) profile—to suit rectangular or irregular footprints. This geometric flexibility allows the structure to transition smoothly from a circular base to an elliptical profile, distinguishing it from more uniform spherical variants while maintaining a continuous curved shell. Ellipsoidal domes find prominent use in large-scale venues like sports facilities, where their elongated profiles enhance sightlines and accommodate extended playing fields without internal supports. For instance, the retractable elliptical roof at in , covers an expansive area of over 660,000 square feet, optimizing visibility for spectators across a rectangular field. Saddle-shaped variants of this form further adapt to functional needs in arenas, providing varied elevations that improve airflow and lighting distribution. Unlike the consistent curvature of hemispherical domes, this adaptability enables coverage of non-circular spaces efficiently. The variable curvature inherent to ellipsoidal geometry offers structural advantages, including reduced material requirements by tailoring thickness to stress patterns, potentially lowering overall weight compared to equivalent spherical shells. In certain configurations, this shape also supports improved acoustics by directing sound waves more effectively toward audiences in elongated halls. However, the non-uniform profile leads to challenges in load distribution, with uneven meridional and hoop stresses that can cause shape deformation or under external pressures, often requiring targeted reinforcements like radial ties or stiffening ribs. Notable examples, such as the elliptical dome at the Santuario di Vicoforte in —the largest of its kind at 36.5 meters high—have faced historical cracking due to differential settlements, underscoring the need for precise foundation and monitoring strategies.

Geodesic Dome

A is a polyhedral structure that approximates a or hemispherical shape through a framework of interconnected triangular struts, distributing loads evenly for maximal structural efficiency. Popularized by inventor and architect in the 1940s and 1950s, the design leverages the principle of "doing more with less" by subdividing the edges of platonic solids, such as the , into shorter segments along great circles of the enclosing . These great circles are divided into struts that form a network of equilateral or near-equilateral triangles, creating a self-bracing lattice that approximates the curved surface of a . The degree of curvature and smoothness depends on the subdivision frequency, denoted as "V" (for vector); for instance, a 2V divides each edge of the base into two equal parts, resulting in a dome with 80 triangular faces and increased spherical fidelity compared to lower frequencies. One of the primary advantages of geodesic domes is their superior strength-to-weight ratio, achieved through the geometric rigidity of the triangular elements, which efficiently transfer stresses without requiring internal supports. This design also confers high resistance to dynamic loads, including earthquakes, as numerical analyses demonstrate that geodesic frameworks exhibit low deformation and stable dynamic responses under seismic excitations. Furthermore, their ability to span large areas—up to 210 meters in diameter, as seen in the —makes them suitable for expansive enclosures like stadiums or halls, enclosing vast volumes with minimal material use. In construction, geodesic domes are typically assembled using a hub-and-strut system, where lightweight struts (often aluminum or steel) connect at multi-jointed hubs to form the skeletal frame, allowing for and rapid on-site erection. Panels—ranging from opaque cladding to transparent materials like or —can then be attached to the framework, enabling applications such as greenhouses where natural light penetration supports plant growth and energy efficiency. Strut lengths are determined using chord factors, which account for the projection of spherical arcs onto straight-line segments in the dome's framework. In spherical coordinates, the chord length dd between two points separated by an θ\theta on a of RR is given by: d=2Rsin(θ2)d = 2R \sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) The chord factor, a dimensionless value dR=2sin(θ2)\frac{d}{R} = 2 \sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right), is multiplied by the desired dome to obtain actual lengths, ensuring precise fitting during assembly.

Hemispherical Dome

The hemispherical dome represents the archetypal form of a dome in architecture, defined by its precise geometry as a perfect half-sphere. This shape arises from the rotation of a semicircle around its vertical diameter, resulting in uniform curvature where the radius equals the base diameter. The curved surface area of such a dome is calculated as 2πr22\pi r^2, where rr is the radius, providing a minimal surface for enclosing maximum volume and facilitating efficient load transfer to the supporting walls. Construction of hemispherical domes traditionally involves methods that exploit the form's inherent stability for even load distribution. In ancient examples like the Roman Pantheon, the dome was formed through monolithic pours of unreinforced , layered in progressively lighter aggregates from heavy at the base to at the apex, achieving a thickness tapering from 6 meters to 1.2 meters. This technique allowed the to self-support during via temporary wooden centering, with the 's pozzolanic properties ensuring long-term without internal . Alternatively, tiled or versions use interlocking voussoirs or bricks arranged in concentric courses, as seen in some Byzantine adaptations, though these demand precise for alignment. Hemispherical domes find prominent applications in central-plan buildings, where their enhances spatial unity and perceptual harmony, as exemplified by the Pantheon in , completed around 126 CE under Emperor . This structure, with its 43.3-meter-diameter dome matching the rotunda's height, creates an immersive interior volume illuminated by a central oculus, embodying architectural ideals of proportion and enclosure. Symbolically, the form evokes and the celestial vault, representing the divine sphere in religious and civic contexts, from Roman temples to revivals. Despite these advantages, hemispherical domes pose significant limitations for large-scale implementation due to their material demands and weight. The Pantheon's dome remains the largest unreinforced example at 43.3 meters in span, as greater sizes risk compressive failure or buckling without modern reinforcements like or tensile membranes, necessitating alternative forms for expansive modern applications.

Bulbous and Onion Domes

Bulbous and onion domes feature a distinctive swollen, pointed profile with a bulging mid-section that tapers gracefully to an apex, employing compound to produce striking visual drama and a of upward . This shape creates a bulbous form reminiscent of an , where the central portion expands outward before narrowing at the base, allowing for enhanced height and aesthetic emphasis in architectural compositions. The compound distinguishes these domes from simpler profiles, contributing to their dynamic against the skyline. These domes trace their origins to Persian and Islamic architectural influences, emerging prominently during the Safavid period and drawing from earlier Central Asian and Timurid traditions to emphasize verticality and grandeur. Multi-layered constructions, often double-shelled, were developed to achieve greater elevation, building briefly on layering techniques seen in compound dome designs. Representative examples include the bulbous of the Shah Mosque in , , which spans approximately 23 meters in diameter and rises to 52 meters in height, showcasing the form's evolution in religious structures. Similarly, the Shah Cheragh Shrine in exemplifies the 's integration into Persian sacred spaces, highlighting its role in post-Islamic architectural innovation. Construction of bulbous and onion domes typically involves masonry as the primary material, often combined with tiles for exterior cladding to withstand environmental stresses while allowing intricate decorative patterns. Double-shell systems are common, with an inner shell providing and an outer shell defining the aesthetic profile; wooden centering is employed temporarily during erection to shape the curving form before permanent bracing with stiffener walls counters horizontal thrusts. Finials, often ornate metal or spires, crown the apex to enhance the spire-like effect and symbolize culmination. Culturally, bulbous and onion domes hold profound significance in Persian and Islamic contexts, representing the heavens and divine unity through their upward-reaching forms that evoke cosmic aspirations. They adorn minarets and portals to assert spiritual authority and visual prominence, while their exotic, bulbous allure later influenced church designs in regions like , adding an element of otherworldly elegance to non-Islamic sacred architecture. This symbolic role underscores their function beyond structure, as markers of and architectural prestige.

Oval Dome

An oval dome features an elliptical or egg-shaped plan, distinguishing it from circular domes by adapting to elongated or rectangular bases in architectural designs. This geometry involves an adjusted curvature along the major and minor axes of the oval base, ensuring the dome's surface transitions smoothly from the perimeter to a central apex while distributing structural loads. Such forms emerged prominently in the late Renaissance and Baroque periods to cover non-circular spaces without intermediate supports. Construction of oval domes often employs segmented arches radiating from the perimeter or molded masonry shells formed in timber centering, with Baroque architects adapting these techniques to create dynamic interiors. For instance, Guarini's designs in Turin utilized interlaced ribs to form the vault, allowing for intricate geometric patterns while maintaining stability through layered brickwork. These methods required precise scaffolding to shape the varying radii of the oval profile during erection. The primary advantages of oval domes lie in their ability to fit irregular or rectangular sites, such as elongated naves in churches, thereby maximizing usable interior space and creating a sense of expansive volume under a unified curved . This adaptability enhanced spatial flow in , where the elongated form could align with processional paths or emphasize longitudinal axes. However, oval domes present challenges due to their complex lines, which deviate from the uniform radial distribution in circular domes, leading to uneven horizontal forces that demand robust buttresses or thickened walls for containment. The locus of the center forms an irregular line, complicating equilibrium and often requiring additional flying buttresses or reinforced bases to prevent outward spreading.

Paraboloid Dome

A dome features an upward-curving parabolic profile that optimizes structural performance through compression, with its surface mathematically defined by the equation z=x2+y24fz = \frac{x^2 + y^2}{4f}, where ff represents the . This geometry enables the dome to naturally channel vertical loads downward along efficient compression paths, enhancing overall stability without requiring extensive material. In architectural applications, domes are prominently realized as thin-shell structures, such as those innovated by Mexican engineer in the mid-20th century, who utilized similar curved forms to cover large areas with minimal resources. These designs, including his iconic hyperbolic paraboloid-influenced roofs, demonstrate the form's versatility in creating expansive, lightweight enclosures for public buildings and markets. Key advantages of domes include their capacity for extreme material efficiency, achieving thicknesses as low as 5 cm over spans reaching 50 m, which reduces construction costs and weight while maintaining integrity. Additionally, the curved profile contributes to resilience by distributing dynamic forces evenly across the shell, allowing flexibility under seismic loads without . Construction of paraboloid domes typically employs sprayed applied over temporary or precast elements assembled on-site, minimizing the need for extensive permanent supports due to the shape's inherent load-bearing efficiency. Compared to hemispherical domes, forms provide superior stress distribution by aligning compression lines more uniformly.

Sail Dome

A sail dome is a lightweight resembling a or , formed by a tensioned supported over radial cables or masts to create a dome-like canopy. The design leverages the hyperbolic , which introduces anticlastic —curving in directions along principal axes—to enhance through natural tension distribution. This form allows the membrane to resist deformation without requiring rigid supports, often arranged in modular panels to approximate a curved dome profile. Common materials include PTFE-coated fiberglass fabric, valued for its high tensile strength, weather resistance, and translucency, enabling spans of up to 200 meters in large installations. The fabric is typically seam-welded into panels and anchored to edge cables or perimeter frames, with the providing self-cleaning properties and a lifespan exceeding 20-30 years under exposure. Sail domes offer advantages such as portability and rapid assembly, making them ideal for temporary event coverings like festivals or sports venues, where modular components can be erected in days using minimal . Their translucent nature diffuses natural daylight, reducing reliance on artificial and enhancing energy efficiency in covered spaces. Mechanically, sail domes operate under pre-stressed tension to counter environmental loads, particularly , by distributing forces evenly across the without inducing compression. This prestressing, achieved during installation via adjustable cables or jacks, ensures the structure maintains and stability, with the anticlastic aiding in shedding and loads efficiently. The influence in the derives from its efficient load path in tension-only systems, optimizing use for applications.

Saucer Dome

A saucer dome is a shallow, disc-like architectural defined by its low-profile , featuring a rise-to-span significantly less than that of a hemisphere, often resulting in a nearly flat appearance from below. This geometry distributes loads efficiently through membrane action in the shell, minimizing the need for internal supports. Typically constructed from , saucer domes leverage the material's to form thin shells, with thicknesses as low as 3.5 inches in large-scale examples. These domes find applications in industrial roofs for spanning vast areas without obstructions, water reservoirs to provide weatherproof covers over storage tanks, and mid-20th century civic buildings seeking expansive, unobstructed interiors. A notable example is the Assembly Hall (now ) at the , completed in 1963, where a saucer dome covers an arena with a 400-foot span, supporting events for thousands while maintaining a low overall height.) Similar uses appear in enclosures, where shallow domes form protective roofs over cylindrical structures. Construction of saucer domes often involves approximating the subtle curve with flat or gently inclined segments, such as in folded-plate designs, which are cast in place using temporary and reinforced with bars or prestressing tendons to handle tensile forces at the edges. Support is provided by circumferential edge beams or rings that resist outward thrusts, allowing the shell to act as a self-supporting compression structure once cured. This method was employed in early 20th-century examples like the saucer dome of St. Blasien Church in (1910), spanning 33.7 meters in . The primary advantages of saucer domes lie in their economy for wide, low-height enclosures, as the shallow form reduces material volume compared to taller domes while enabling clear spans up to hundreds of feet, ideal for utilitarian spaces like factories or storage facilities where headroom is secondary to coverage.

Umbrella Dome

An umbrella dome features a structural system of radial ribs, or spokes, that radiate from a central hub at the apex to the perimeter ring, supporting infill panels and creating a segmented, umbrella-like form. This configuration divides the dome into curved segments that follow the elevation curve, enabling a seamless transition from a circular crown to a polygonal base while distributing loads efficiently to peripheral supports. The ribs act as primary load-bearing elements, often designed as statically determinate beams spanning from the hub to the compression ring at the base. In applications, umbrella domes are employed in atriums, markets, and long-span public buildings, where they cover expansive areas without internal columns; typical spans range from 30 to 50 meters, as seen in structures like certain modern exhibition halls and shelters. For instance, and temporary shelters utilize this for rapid deployment over diameters up to 32 meters. Construction involves or timber connected at the apex hub, clad with lightweight materials such as metal panels or composites for weatherproofing and aesthetics. The advantages of umbrella domes include maximizing clear interior space for unobstructed views and activities, as well as facilitating modular and on-site assembly, which reduces construction time and costs compared to monolithic shells. This ribbed approach shares the shallow profile of saucer domes but relies on discrete supports rather than continuous surfaces.

Historical Development

Early and Simple Domes

The earliest forms of simple domes emerged during the period in the , particularly in regions such as southeast , , and , around 8000 BCE, as part of the transition to settled agricultural communities. These structures were typically round huts with circular walls made from mud or wattle-and-daub, topped by conical or low-domed roofs constructed from thatched materials like reeds or grass layered over wooden frames. Such designs provided basic from the elements and were well-suited to the available local resources, reflecting an intuitive use of curved forms for efficient covering without advanced . Construction techniques for these early domes relied on rudimentary materials and methods, including mud-brick molded from local clay and mixtures or cut from the earth, applied over simple bent-branch or post frameworks to form beehive-like profiles. Spans were inherently limited to approximately 5-10 meters due to the constraints of these organic and earthen materials, which lacked the tensile needed for larger vaults. In the and parts of , these domes served practical functions as temporary or semi-permanent shelters for living spaces and storage, with evidence of their use in early village layouts for communal protection against and . By the , around 1600 BCE, more durable stone versions appeared in , exemplified by the Mycenaean tholos tombs in mainland Greece, such as those near and in . These were subterranean burial chambers built using corbelled construction, where successive horizontal layers of or conglomerate blocks were progressively cantilevered inward to form a beehive-shaped dome, often reaching diameters of 4-13 meters. The technique marked a refinement of prehistoric methods, employing massive for stability, though still constrained by corbelling's limitations in height and span compared to later innovations. This period also witnessed a gradual transition from purely corbelled beehive domes to the incorporation of true arches in some contexts, particularly in the and Aegean, where radial voussoirs began enabling more efficient load distribution and larger enclosures. While corbelled forms persisted for their simplicity in and granaries, the shift toward true arches laid groundwork for advanced vaulting in subsequent eras, bridging prehistoric intuition with emerging structural sophistication.

East Asian Domes

In East Asia, the development of domes was markedly different from other regions, characterized by their scarcity in permanent architectural forms and concentration in funerary, cave, and temporary structures. During the Han Dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE), early examples appeared in tomb architecture, where brick and stone constructions featured domed ceilings to mimic celestial vaults or provide structural stability underground. For instance, certain Western Han tombs employed corbelled or true domed roofs in their chambers, as seen in excavated sites where the curved forms symbolized the heavens and protected burial goods. Wooden bracketing systems, such as the interlocking dougong brackets, occasionally supported these tomb vaults or proto-dome elements, allowing for flexible load distribution in subterranean settings. These innovations reflected a blend of practical engineering and cosmological symbolism, though they remained confined to non-monumental contexts. Permanent domes were rare across , , and Korea, largely due to the region's seismic activity and the dominance of wooden post-and-beam , which favored flexible, earthquake-resistant frameworks over rigid forms. Instead of enduring buildings, East Asian domes often manifested in temporary or semi-permanent applications, such as festival pavilions covered with fabric canopies or tiled frames that could be assembled and dismantled seasonally. These lightweight structures, used for imperial ceremonies or religious events, employed or wooden lattices overlaid with fabrics or tiles to approximate curved enclosures without the vulnerabilities of stone. In Korea, a notable exception was the Grotto (completed around 774 CE during the period), where over 360 precisely cut slabs formed a corbelled dome in the rotunda, creating an acoustically resonant space for . This artificial cave exemplifies the adaptation of domical forms in , prioritizing durability in a seismically prone landscape. Buddhist influences played a key role, with hemispherical shapes derived from Indian stupas—relic mounds topped with dome-like anda—adapted into East Asian contexts through cave temples and reliquaries. In northwestern China, Dunhuang's (from the 4th century onward) incorporated domical vaults in some chambers, blending Central Asian techniques with local wood-framed supports to house Buddhist icons. Japanese architecture, while eschewing true domes, featured chigi—forked wooden finials on shrine roofs—as symbolic echoes of curved, protective forms, evoking early animistic shelters that prefigured more complex enclosures. By the Ming (1368–1644) and Qing (1644–1912) eras, these traditions peaked in refined applications, such as glazed ceramic tiles covering the curved roofs of elite tombs or domes, enhancing weather resistance and aesthetic elegance in garden complexes. These ceramic-clad elements marked a high point in material innovation, though domes remained ancillary to the era's hallmark multi-tiered pagodas. Hemispherical influences from , transmitted via Buddhist stupas, subtly shaped these adaptations without dominating the regional aesthetic.

Roman and Byzantine Domes

The Romans advanced dome construction through the innovative use of concrete, achieving unprecedented spans in monumental architecture. The Pantheon in Rome, completed around 126 CE under Emperor Hadrian, exemplifies this mastery with its massive unreinforced concrete dome spanning 43 meters in diameter and rising to the same height, forming a perfect hemisphere. At the apex, a 9-meter-wide oculus serves both as a light source and structural relief, reducing weight while allowing rainwater to drain through strategically placed marble drains on the floor. To lighten the upper sections, the concrete incorporated lightweight aggregates such as pumice and tuff, with the thickness tapering from 6 meters at the base to 1.2 meters at the oculus, demonstrating precise material gradation for stability. Roman builders employed temporary wooden centering—scaffolded frameworks—to support the during curing, enabling the dome's curved form to be cast in rings that hardened sequentially from the base upward. This technique, combined with hidden or embedded in the for , allowed for large-scale domes without excessive material use, influencing subsequent engineering practices. The refined these Roman innovations, adapting them to Christian ecclesiastical needs with more complex geometries and symbolic forms. The in (modern ), dedicated in 537 CE under Emperor and designed by architects Anthemios of Tralles and Isidorus of , features a central dome with a of approximately 31 meters, rising to about 55 meters above the floor. Unlike the Pantheon's circular base, the dome rests on a square plan via pendentives—triangular curved segments that transition the geometry and distribute lateral thrusts to four massive piers—marking a pivotal advancement for covering orthogonal spaces. Byzantine domes like that of were constructed primarily of laid in thick mortar beds, which provided flexibility against seismic activity, with the structure supported by a ringed by 40 windows for illumination. Hidden ribs radiated from the base to the crown, concealed within the to stiffen the shell and prevent deformation, while wooden centering facilitated the dome's erection in horizontal courses. The slightly flattened profile, inspired by mathematical principles from , enhanced stability over the original hemispherical design, which collapsed in 558 CE and was rebuilt shallower by 562 CE. These Roman and Byzantine domes profoundly shaped , favoring centralized plans that emphasized verticality and cosmic symbolism, with the dome representing the vault of over the congregation. The Pantheon's model influenced imperial and religious buildings, while Hagia Sophia's system enabled widespread adoption of domed cross-insquare plans in Byzantine churches, symbolizing the eternal empire and divine order.

Persian Domes

The development of domes in Persian began prominently during the (224–651 CE), where the dome on squinches first appeared as a key innovation for transitioning from square bases to circular domes. This technique was exemplified in the palace at Firuzabad in Fars, constructed around 224 CE, marking one of the earliest known uses of squinches to support a dome over a square chamber. Sasanian builders employed massive to achieve structural grandeur, as seen in the of (also known as the Arch of ), a monumental vaulted hall dating to the 3rd–6th centuries CE that demonstrated advanced skills transferable to dome engineering, though the structure itself is a rather than a true dome. In the Islamic , Persian dome evolved significantly under the Seljuks in the 11th century, with the introduction of double-shell domes that allowed for distinct interior and exterior profiles while enhancing structural stability and aesthetic height. These innovations enabled larger spans and more elaborate forms, as evident in the , where the south dome chamber, rebuilt in the Seljuk period around 1086–1088 CE, features a double-shell design with a pointed profile that foreshadowed later bulbous developments. The double-shell technique, reinforced by internal arches and geometric brick patterns, became a hallmark of Seljuk mosques, allowing domes to rise dramatically over prayer halls. Key techniques in Persian domes included the use of stilted arches to create pointed forms from semicircular bases, reducing horizontal thrust and facilitating smoother transitions in vaulting systems during both Sasanian and Islamic periods. , an intricate honeycomb-like decoration originating from fragmentation, was widely applied in transition zones beneath domes to provide both structural support and ornate visual effects, evolving into a signature element of Islamic Persian by the . Domes were often elevated on tall cylindrical to increase their visual prominence, a practice also extended to minarets, which featured similar drum bases for stability and height in complexes. Symbolically, the dome in Persian architecture represented the , embodying the universe's wholeness and the vault of heaven, a motif rooted in pre-Islamic traditions and reinforced in Islamic contexts to signify divine order and eternity. This interpretation linked the dome's curved form to primordial creation myths, integrating spiritual cosmology into built environments like palaces and .

Arabic and Western European Domes

In the early Islamic period, architecture featured innovative dome constructions that emphasized lightweight materials and decorative surfaces. The Umayyad Great Mosque in , completed in 715 CE under Caliph , incorporated a prominent wooden dome over the , marking an early example of a centralized, elevated space within a hypostyle . This octagonal wooden structure, originally double-shelled for acoustic and visual emphasis, symbolized divine elevation and drew on Byzantine influences while adapting to local expertise. By the Fatimid era in (10th–12th centuries), dome construction advanced to forms, often using stone or shells for greater durability and ornamentation. In , Fatimid mosques like Al-Azhar (founded 970 CE) employed domes over the and adjacent areas, with angular ribs providing structural reinforcement and allowing for intricate surface patterns. These ribs, typically executed in with a finish, enabled taller profiles and facilitated the transition to more complex geometric designs in later . A key technique in Arabic dome building was the application of stucco over wooden frameworks, which allowed for lightweight spans and elaborate relief decorations. Wooden or lattices formed the structural skeleton, coated with layers of gypsum-based to create smooth, moldable surfaces for carved motifs like arabesques and transitions. This method, prevalent in Umayyad and Fatimid works, balanced engineering efficiency with aesthetic richness, often incorporating palm fibers for added tensile strength. In parallel, Western European architecture during the medieval period revived and adapted dome forms amid the of the 8th century. Charlemagne's Palatine Chapel in , constructed around 792–805 CE, exemplifies this revival with its octagonal dome inspired by Byzantine models like San Vitale in , featuring a stone vault over a centralized plan to evoke imperial and sacred unity. This structure, with its and upper galleries, represented a deliberate emulation of Roman and early Christian precedents to legitimize Carolingian rule. The Romanesque period (11th–12th centuries) saw widespread use of rounded domes across , particularly in regions like , , where they crowned basilical naves and transepts. Churches such as Saint-Front in (ca. 1120–1150) utilized large, hemispherical domes on squinches or pendentives, supported by thick walls and barrel vaults to create expansive, luminous interiors reminiscent of earlier Mediterranean traditions. These rounded forms, often half-domes over apses, emphasized horizontal massing and symbolic enclosure of the sacred space. By the late Romanesque, such domes began transitioning toward Gothic innovations, with rib vaults emerging as skeletal frameworks that distributed weight more efficiently. In , evolving from Romanesque precedents around the mid-12th century, rib vaults supplanted solid domes, enabling taller, more open structures through intersecting stone ribs that funneled loads to piers. This shift, seen in early examples like the of Saint-Denis (ca. 1140), allowed for pointed arches and reduced wall thickness, prioritizing verticality and light. To support these ambitious vaults, flying buttresses became essential, consisting of arched flyers channeling lateral thrust from vaults and roofs to external piers, as prominently featured in cathedrals like (begun 1163). This technique facilitated soaring heights—up to 30 meters in naves—while minimizing interior obstructions. Cultural exchanges during the (11th–13th centuries) influenced this evolution, particularly through the adoption of pointed arches from into Gothic designs. Crusaders encountered ribbed and pointed forms in Syrian and Egyptian mosques, such as the , prompting adaptations that enhanced structural stability in European vaults. This cross-pollination, via trade routes and military contacts, integrated crossed-arch supports and cloister vaults into Western repertoires, bridging Arabic ingenuity with European aspirations for height and harmony.

Russian Domes

Russian domes emerged in the 10th century within Kievan Rus', where the adoption of Byzantine architectural influences following the of 988 CE introduced domed structures to Orthodox church design. Early forms were hemispherical or helmet-shaped, reflecting Byzantine prototypes that emphasized the dome as a symbol of the heavens. By the , Russian domes evolved significantly with the development of tented roofs, a distinctly local innovation that transitioned from wooden bell towers to church coverings, allowing for taller, more pointed forms that culminated in the bulbous . This evolution was facilitated by the introduction of tiered towers and tent-shaped roofs, first perfected in wood construction before adapting to stone, marking a departure from strict Byzantine models toward a more vertical and dynamic . The hallmark of Russian Orthodox onion domes lies in their clustered arrangement, often appearing in groups of three, five, or more atop a single structure, evoking a chandelier-like ascent toward the sky and symbolizing theological concepts such as the Holy Trinity or Christ and the Evangelists. In northern regions, these domes were predominantly constructed from using interlocking logs and overlapping to achieve the characteristic , enabling lightweight yet durable forms resistant to heavy snowfall. Southern areas favored for greater permanence and elaborate , though wooden elements often capped the domes for aesthetic . Following the Mongol invasion of the 13th century, which disrupted architectural continuity, a post-Mongol revival in the 15th and 16th centuries reinvigorated dome design, with onion forms appearing more prominently in icons and structures as a resurgence of pre-invasion traditions blended with innovative tenting techniques. This period saw the onion dome's bulbous profile possibly influenced by Persian architectural motifs encountered through and . A prime example is in , constructed between 1555 and 1561 under Ivan IV to commemorate victories over the Khanates of and , featuring nine vibrantly colored onion domes clustered around a central . These domes symbolize upward-striving flames of divine fire or protective helmets, reinforcing the spiritual aspiration central to Russian Orthodox theology.

Ukrainian Domes

Ukrainian domes emerged as a distinctive architectural feature during the 14th to 18th centuries, particularly within the , where they blended Byzantine traditions with local folk craftsmanship and external influences from Polish styles. This period saw the rise of wooden churches adorned with pear-shaped or helmet-like domes, which served both structural and symbolic purposes in Orthodox religious architecture. These forms evolved from earlier prototypes, adapting to Ukraine's wooded landscapes and seismic considerations through the use of timber construction techniques. Key characteristics of Ukrainian domes include their multi-tiered profiles, often covered in colorful tiles or wooden that provided weather resistance and visual vibrancy. The pear-shaped domes, prominent in Cossack examples, taper gracefully from a broader base to a narrower apex, sometimes incorporating lanterns for added height and light. domes, more common in wooden structures, feature a rounded, protective contour resembling ancient warrior , emphasizing . Low, wide bases were essential for stability, anchoring the domes against strong winds and heavy snowfall prevalent in eastern and . Notable examples illustrate this evolution, such as St. Sophia's Cathedral in , originally constructed in the under Byzantine influence with thirteen domes symbolizing Christ and the apostles, and later rebuilt in the 17th and 18th centuries to incorporate embellishments while preserving its cross-domed core. In vernacular architecture, log cabin-style wooden churches, like those in the Carpathian region, often featured thatched or shingled helmet domes, as seen in the UNESCO-listed tserkvas such as the Church of St. George in , where multi-tiered roofs mimic domed forms for both aesthetic and practical shelter. The cultural role of Ukrainian domes intensified with flourishes following the 17th-century integration into the , which introduced ornate details like volutes and pediments to church facades, symbolizing the Cossack elite's aspirations for cultural sophistication amid political autonomy. These elements not only enhanced the spiritual landscape but also reinforced community identity in rural hetmanate settlements. Ukrainian dome styles share foundational Byzantine with Russian forms, yet developed unique regional expressions through folk adaptations.

Ottoman Domes

Ottoman dome architecture emerged prominently after the Ottoman conquest of in , marking a pivotal moment that integrated Byzantine structural techniques with Persian stylistic influences to create a distinctive synthesis in . The fall of the city allowed Ottoman builders direct access to Byzantine masterpieces like the , whose conversion into a mosque highlighted the potential of large-scale domed spaces for religious and imperial expression. This period saw early Ottoman architects adapting these elements, blending the geometric precision of Persian domes—often more bulbous in profile—with the expansive, light-filled interiors favored in Byzantine designs. A defining figure in this evolution was the architect , whose designs in the 1550s, particularly the Suleymaniye Mosque in , epitomized the maturation of Ottoman dome aesthetics and engineering. Commissioned by Sultan and completed between 1550 and 1557, the Suleymaniye's central dome spans 27 meters in diameter and rises to 53 meters, supported by a system of semi-domes that distribute weight efficiently while enhancing spatial harmony. Sinan drew on Byzantine precedents for the overall form but infused Persian-inspired elegance through refined proportions and decorative motifs, creating a unified visual ascent toward the dome's apex that symbolized divine unity. Key characteristics of Ottoman domes include massive central domes paired with cascading semi-domes to form expansive halls, slender pencil-shaped minarets for vertical emphasis, and lavish materials such as white marble for structural elements and vibrant tiles for interior adornment. These features not only served functional purposes but also conveyed imperial power, with the dome's interior often illuminated by numerous windows to evoke celestial light. Ottoman domes occasionally incorporated and bulbous types for added visual dynamism in subsidiary structures. In terms of techniques, Ottoman builders relied on pendentives—triangular sections of —to smoothly transition from square bases to the circular dome profile, enabling the vast interiors seen in conversions and Sinan's mosques. To address the seismic risks of the region, foundations were deepened into , and constructions incorporated flexible elements like timber reinforcements and lead sheeting on domes to absorb shocks, as evidenced in repairs to structures like the Beyazit II Mosque after the 1509 earthquake. Sinan's innovations further refined these methods, using lighter brickwork and precise load distribution to achieve unprecedented stability and scale. The zenith of Ottoman dome architecture unfolded in the 16th century during the Magnificent's reign (1520–1566), when oversaw over 300 projects, elevating the style to its classical peak through balanced innovation and grandeur. This era's designs profoundly influenced the , where Ottoman administration disseminated similar domed mosques and complexes, adapting them to local contexts while preserving core elements of the synthesis.

Italian Renaissance Domes

The revived classical dome architecture in during the 15th and 16th centuries, driven by humanist scholars and architects who sought to emulate ancient Roman models while advancing engineering innovations. This period's domes emphasized mathematical precision, structural daring, and symbolic grandeur, reflecting a cultural rebirth of antiquity through proportions inspired by Vitruvius's principles of and . Key figures like pioneered these advancements, designing the dome for (), completed in 1436, which spans an inner diameter of approximately 45 meters—the largest masonry dome of its time—using a double-shell structure with inner and outer layers connected by ribs and reinforced by iron chains to distribute without external buttresses. Construction techniques during this era prioritized self-supporting methods to avoid the massive wooden centering used in medieval builds. Brunelleschi employed herringbone brickwork, laying bricks in a spiraling, pattern that formed a double-helix system, allowing the dome to rise progressively without temporary and ensuring stability through mutual compression between horizontal and vertical courses. These innovations adhered to Vitruvian proportions, where dimensions followed ideal ratios—such as the dome's height equaling its diameter—to evoke classical harmony and the human scale writ large. Dome characteristics often included ribbed exteriors for both strength and visual rhythm, as seen in the octagonal ribs of the Florence dome, and interiors embellished with frescoes to create immersive celestial narratives; for instance, the Duomo's vast interior features Giorgio Vasari's and Zuccaro's fresco cycle, begun in 1568, which dramatizes divine themes across the curved surface. Michelangelo Buonarroti further exemplified these traits in his design for the dome of in [Vatican City](/page/Vatican City), initiated in the 1540s and completed posthumously in 1590, with a 42-meter and a double-shell form featuring 16 massive ribs that rise to a height of 138 meters, crowned by a for light and emphasis. The dome's ogival profile and proportional scaling drew directly from ancient precedents, symbolizing the aspiration to reconnect with antiquity's monumental legacy. These structures influenced the transition to Mannerism in the late , where architects like adapted ribbed and scaled forms into more elongated, expressive designs that retained classical roots while introducing subtle distortions for dramatic effect. Overall, domes embodied the era's fusion of art, science, and symbolism, representing humanity's renewed mastery over ancient forms and serving as enduring icons of cultural revival. Oval and compound dome applications emerged briefly in and palatial contexts, adapting circular ideals to irregular spaces.

South Asian Domes

South Asian dome architecture emerged prominently during the Mughal era in the 16th century, marking a synthesis of Persian Islamic traditions and indigenous Indian elements. The origins trace back to Humayun's Tomb in Delhi, completed in 1565, which is recognized as the first major Mughal architectural project featuring a large central dome. This structure introduced the lotus dome, a double-layered design with a bulbous profile that blended Persian influences—acquired during Humayun's exile—with local motifs like the inverted lotus calyx finial, symbolizing purity in Hindu-Buddhist iconography. Key characteristics of South Asian domes include the prominent use of pavilions—elevated, dome-capped kiosks on slender columns that originally served as Hindu cenotaphs but were adapted by Mughals for roofline ornamentation, as seen in the Taj Mahal's surrounding platform. Onion-shaped or bulbous profiles, often executed in red or white , became hallmarks, providing a graceful swell that enhanced visual scale against the subcontinent's vast landscapes; these forms drew brief bulbous influences from Persian prototypes but evolved with local embellishments like inlay. In and eastern regions, curved roofs such as the do-chala or char-chala styles represented dome variants, with bent bamboo-thatched forms transitioning to terracotta or , suited to heavy monsoons and evoking a fluid, wave-like silhouette. Construction techniques in South Asian domes varied between Hindu and Islamic traditions. In pre-Mughal Hindu temples, corbelling—progressive overhanging courses of stone forming a false vault—dominated dome-like roofs, as in the early rock-cut chaityas of the Deccan, where interlocking blocks created stable, inward-leaning profiles without true arches. Mughal innovations integrated domes with minars (tall minarets), using rubble cores faced with cut stone and reinforced by iron dowels for hoop tension, allowing larger spans as in the (1656) in , where an immense single dome spans 44 meters via an octagonal and pendentives. Materials emphasized durability, with for structural bases and for veneers, often joined by infused with herbal additives for seismic resilience. The evolution of South Asian domes continued under British colonial rule through the Indo-Saracenic style, which revived Mughal forms like onion domes and chhatris in public buildings, adapting them to neoclassical frameworks for imperial symbolism, as in the Victoria Memorial () in with its marble-clad dome echoing Persian-Mughal curves. Post-independence in and from 1947 onward, domes transitioned to modern concrete construction, enabling expansive, lightweight designs that honored heritage while embracing functionality; notable examples include Le Corbusier's Capitol Complex in (1950s), where hyperbolic paraboloid roofs integrated with modernist geometry to symbolize national renewal. This shift prioritized seismic engineering and , reducing reliance on traditional while preserving cultural motifs in urban landmarks.

Early Modern Domes

The , spanning the 17th to 19th centuries, saw significant innovations in dome design across and its colonies, blending artistic exuberance with emerging structural techniques. In , domes emphasized dramatic curvature and light manipulation to evoke emotion and grandeur. domes often incorporated undulating surfaces for visual complexity, as seen in Francesco Borromini's in (completed 1667), where wavy walls and ribbed vaults produce rhythmic, flowing forms that enhance spatial illusion. Complementing these were illusionistic paintings, such as Andrea Pozzo's in the Church of (1685), which depicts a painted dome with architectural perspective to simulate an expansive vaulted ceiling, drawing viewers into a heavenly illusion. Neoclassical domes revived ancient Roman forms with refined proportions and rational engineering, often adapting the Pantheon as a model. Thomas Jefferson's in , redesigned in the early 1800s, features a shallow octagonal dome inspired by the Pantheon's oculus and coffered interior, symbolizing Enlightenment ideals of harmony and light; its wooden structure was covered with tin-coated iron shingles for durability against the elements. This revival extended to structural enhancements, including iron elements to reinforce against outward thrust, as in Christopher Wren's in (completed 1710), where concealed iron chains encircled the dome's base to counter tensile forces, marking an early experiment in hybrid masonry-iron construction. These innovations built briefly on saucer domes for their low profiles and Byzantine umbrella precursors for radial ribbing, but shifted toward greater scale and material integration. In colonial contexts, domes proliferated in the , adapting European styles to local conditions. The , constructed from 1573 to 1813, incorporates a neoclassical dome over the crossing, designed by Manuel Tolsá in 1780 with an octagonal drum that admits light through its , blending ornamentation with rational geometry amid the site's Aztec foundations. The industrial era further advanced dome with , enabling lightweight, prefabricated spans; the U.S. Capitol dome in (1855–1866), utilized over 8,900,000 pounds of in its skeletal frame, allowing a vast interior without excessive masonry weight. Lanterns emerged as key features for illumination, crowning domes like St. Paul's with glazed cupolas that flooded interiors with natural light while aiding ventilation, a practice rooted in and neoclassical designs. These tensile experiments and material shifts laid groundwork for larger, more stable domes in expanding global empires.

Modern and Contemporary Domes

In the mid-20th century, engineering innovations in enabled the construction of large-scale domes that pushed structural boundaries while accommodating public functions. Pier Luigi Nervi's in , completed in 1957 for the 1960 Olympics, exemplifies this era with its 61-meter-diameter ribbed concrete shell dome, assembled from 1,620 prefabricated elements that create a lightweight yet robust enclosure spanning 60 meters internally. The design integrates inclined trestles and a prestressed foundation ring to distribute loads efficiently, allowing the arena to seat 5,000 spectators under a thin-shell structure that minimizes material use. Similarly, Buckminster Fuller's for the at in represented a breakthrough in lightweight, modular architecture; this 76-meter-diameter transparent sphere, erected in 1967, utilized a triangulated covered in acrylic panels to enclose exhibition spaces, demonstrating the dome's potential for rapid assembly and expansive interiors. Contemporary domes have embraced complex geometries and , often blending with functionality in high-profile projects. The , known as the Bird's Nest and completed in 2008 for the Olympics, features an interwoven steel exoskeleton weighing 42,000 tons, forming a saddle-shaped enclosure that spans 333 meters in perimeter and rises 69 meters high, where the structural lattice doubles as the facade to evoke organic form while supporting a 91,000-seat capacity. In residential applications, 3D-printed prototypes like the TECLA house in , unveiled in 2021, showcase sustainable fabrication; this 60-square-meter structure consists of two interconnected clay domes printed on-site using local , achieving carbon neutrality through a modular crane-based printer that layers earthen material for and seismic resilience. tools such as Rhino and have facilitated these innovations by enabling architects to generate and optimize intricate dome forms, as seen in algorithmic modeling of curved surfaces for projects like pavilion prototypes that adapt to site-specific wind and light conditions. Sustainability drives modern dome innovations, with materials and methods prioritizing environmental integration. The in , , opened in 2000, employs over 600 hexagonal cushions—each a , recyclable foil inflated to 0.2 millimeters thick—across steel frames spanning up to 125 meters, creating biomes that reduce energy use by 90% compared to glass equivalents through high light transmission and low . In extraterrestrial contexts, Sierra Space's Large Flexible Environment () habitat, developed with support and tested in 2024, expands from compact modules to 8.2-meter-diameter (27-foot) pressurized volumes using layered and fabrics, offering scalable living spaces for lunar or Martian missions with radiation shielding and micrometeoroid protection. further enhances efficiency by optimizing dome geometries; for instance, algorithms integrated with parametric modeling have been used to refine spatial structures, achieving up to 25% reductions in heating and cooling demands through simulated airflow and solar gain in dome-like forms. Despite these advances, modern and contemporary domes face challenges in adapting to extremes and preserving heritage. and similar dome forms have gained traction for , as their curved profiles distribute wind loads effectively and maintain internal temperatures with minimal energy, aiding disaster-prone regions like wildfire zones in . Post-2020 seismic events, such as the , have prompted assessments of heritage dome sites; a 2025 study modeled potential seismic strengthening of the Mirogoj Mortuary vaults in using fiber-reinforced methods, showing possible improvements in by up to 40% without altering visual integrity, serving as a model for balancing preservation with modern safety standards.

References

  1. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/47658502_Development_Characteristics_and_Comparative_Structural_Analysis_of_Tensegrity_Type_Cable_Domes
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.