Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Rail transport
View on Wikipedia

Rail transport (also known as train transport) is a means of transport using wheeled vehicles running in tracks, which usually consist of two parallel steel rails.[1] Rail transport is one of the two primary means of land transport, next to road transport. It is used for about 8% of passenger and freight transport globally,[2] thanks to its energy efficiency[2] and potentially high speed. Also, the track spreads the weight of the train which means larger amounts can be carried than with trucks on roads.
| Part of a series on |
| Rail transport |
|---|
|
|
| Infrastructure |
|
|
| Rolling stock |
|
|
| Urban rail transit |
|
|
| Other topics |
|
|
Rolling stock on rails generally encounters lower frictional resistance than rubber-tyred road vehicles, allowing rail cars to be coupled into longer trains. Power is usually provided by diesel or electric locomotives. While railway transport is capital-intensive and less flexible than road transport, it can carry heavy loads of passengers and cargo with greater energy efficiency and safety.[a]
Precursors of railways driven by human or animal power, have existed since antiquity, but modern rail transport began with the invention of the steam locomotive in the United Kingdom at the beginning of the 19th century. The first passenger railway, the Stockton and Darlington Railway, opened in 1825. The quick spread of railways throughout Europe and North America, following the 1830 opening of the first intercity connection in England, was a key component of the Industrial Revolution. The adoption of rail transport lowered shipping costs compared to transport by water or wagon, and led to "national markets" in which prices varied less from city to city.[3][4][5][6][7][8]
Railroads not only increased the speed of transport, they also dramatically lowered its cost. For example, the first transcontinental railroad in the United States resulted in passengers and freight being able to cross the country in a matter of days instead of months and at one tenth the cost of stagecoach or wagon transport. With economical transportation in the West (which had been referred to as the Great American Desert), now farming, ranching and mining could be done at a profit. As a result, railroads transformed the country, particularly the West (which had few navigable rivers).[9][10][11][12][13][14]
In the 1880s, railway electrification began with tramways and rapid transit systems. Starting in the 1940s, steam locomotives were replaced by diesel locomotives. The first high-speed railway system was introduced in Japan in 1964, and high-speed rail lines now connect many cities in Europe, East Asia, and the eastern United States. Following some decline due to competition from cars and aeroplanes, rail transport has had a revival in recent decades due to road congestion and rising fuel prices, as well as governments investing in rail as a means of reducing CO2 emissions.
History
[edit]Smooth, durable road surfaces have been made for wheeled vehicles since prehistoric times. In some cases, they were narrow and in pairs to support only the wheels. That is, they were wagonways or tracks. Some had grooves or flanges or other mechanical means to keep the wheels on track.
For example, evidence indicates that a 6 to 8.5 km long Diolkos paved trackway transported boats across the Isthmus of Corinth in Greece from around 600 BC. The Diolkos was in use for over 650 years, until at least the 1st century AD.[15] Paved trackways were also later built in Roman Egypt.[16]
Pre-steam modern systems
[edit]Wooden rails introduced
[edit]
In 1515, Cardinal Matthäus Lang wrote a description of the Reisszug, a funicular railway at the Hohensalzburg Fortress in Austria. The line originally used wooden rails and a hemp haulage rope and was operated by human or animal power, through a treadwheel.[17] The line is still operational, although in updated form and is possibly the oldest operational railway.[18]
Wagonways (or tramways) using wooden rails, hauled by horses, started appearing in the 1550s to facilitate the transport of ore tubs to and from mines and soon became popular in Europe. Such an operation was illustrated in Germany in 1556 by Georgius Agricola in his work De re metallica.[19] This line used "Hund" carts with unflanged wheels running on wooden planks and a vertical pin on the truck fitting into the gap between the planks to keep it going the right way. The miners called the wagons Hunde ("dogs") from the noise they made on the tracks.[20]
There are many references to their use in central Europe in the 16th century.[21] Such a transport system was later used by German miners at Caldbeck, Cumbria, England, perhaps from the 1560s.[22] A wagonway was built at Prescot, near Liverpool, sometime around 1600, possibly as early as 1594. Owned by Philip Layton, the line carried coal from a pit near Prescot Hall to a terminus about one-half mile (800 m) away.[23] A funicular railway was also made at Broseley in Shropshire some time before 1604. This carried coal for James Clifford from his mines down to the River Severn to be loaded onto barges and carried to riverside towns.[24] The Wollaton Wagonway, completed in 1604 by Huntingdon Beaumont, has sometimes erroneously been cited as the earliest British railway. It ran from Strelley to Wollaton near Nottingham.[25]
The Middleton Railway in Leeds, which was built in 1758, later became the world's oldest operational railway (other than funiculars), albeit now in an upgraded form. In 1764, the first railway in the Americas was built in Lewiston, New York.[26]
Metal rails introduced
[edit]

In the late 1760s, the Coalbrookdale Company began to fix plates of cast iron to the upper surface of the wooden rails. This allowed a variation of gauge to be used. At first only balloon loops could be used for turning, but later, movable points were taken into use that allowed for switching.[27]
A system was introduced in which unflanged wheels ran on L-shaped metal plates, which came to be known as plateways. John Curr, a Sheffield colliery manager, invented this flanged rail in 1787, though the exact date of this is disputed. The plate rail was taken up by Benjamin Outram for wagonways serving his canals, manufacturing them at his Butterley ironworks. In 1803, William Jessop opened the Surrey Iron Railway, a double track plateway, erroneously sometimes cited as world's first public railway, in south London.[28]
William Jessop had earlier used a form of all-iron edge rail and flanged wheels successfully for an extension to the Charnwood Forest Canal at Nanpantan, Loughborough, Leicestershire in 1789. In 1790, Jessop and his partner Outram began to manufacture edge rails. Jessop became a partner in the Butterley Company in 1790. The first public edgeway (thus also first public railway) built was Lake Lock Rail Road in 1796. Although the primary purpose of the line was to carry coal, it also carried passengers.
These two systems of constructing iron railways, the "L" plate-rail and the smooth edge-rail, continued to exist side by side until well into the early 19th century. The flanged wheel and edge-rail eventually proved its superiority and became the standard for railways.
Cast iron used in rails proved unsatisfactory because it was brittle and broke under heavy loads. The wrought iron invented by John Birkinshaw in 1820 replaced cast iron. Wrought iron, usually simply referred to as "iron", was a ductile material that could undergo considerable deformation before breaking, making it more suitable for iron rails. But iron was expensive to produce until Henry Cort patented the puddling process in 1784. In 1783 Cort also patented the rolling process, which was 15 times faster at consolidating and shaping iron than hammering.[29] These processes greatly lowered the cost of producing iron and rails. The next important development in iron production was hot blast developed by James Beaumont Neilson (patented 1828), which considerably reduced the amount of coke (fuel) or charcoal needed to produce pig iron.[30] Wrought iron was a soft material that contained slag or dross. The softness and dross tended to make iron rails distort and delaminate and they lasted less than 10 years. Sometimes they lasted as little as one year under high traffic. All these developments in the production of iron eventually led to the replacement of composite wood/iron rails with superior all-iron rails. The introduction of the Bessemer process, enabling steel to be made inexpensively, led to the era of great expansion of railways that began in the late 1860s. Steel rails lasted several times longer than iron.[31][32][33] Steel rails made heavier locomotives possible, allowing for longer trains and improving the productivity of railroads.[34] The Bessemer process introduced nitrogen into the steel, which caused the steel to become brittle with age. The open hearth furnace began to replace the Bessemer process near the end of the 19th century, improving the quality of steel and further reducing costs. Thus steel completely replaced the use of iron in rails, becoming standard for all railways.
The first passenger horsecar or tram, Swansea and Mumbles Railway, was opened between Swansea and Mumbles in Wales in 1807.[35] Horses remained the preferable mode for tram transport even after the arrival of steam engines until the end of the 19th century, because they were cleaner compared to steam-driven trams which caused smoke in city streets.
Steam power introduced
[edit]
In 1784, James Watt, a Scottish inventor and mechanical engineer, patented a design for a steam locomotive. Watt had improved the steam engine of Thomas Newcomen, hitherto used to pump water out of mines, and developed a reciprocating engine in 1769 capable of powering a wheel. This was a large stationary engine, powering cotton mills and a variety of machinery; the state of boiler technology necessitated the use of low-pressure steam acting upon a vacuum in the cylinder, which required a separate condenser and an air pump. Nevertheless, as the construction of boilers improved, Watt investigated the use of high-pressure steam acting directly upon a piston, raising the possibility of a smaller engine that might be used to power a vehicle. Following his patent, Watt's employee William Murdoch produced a working model of a self-propelled steam carriage in that year.[36]
The first full-scale working railway steam locomotive was built in the United Kingdom in 1804 by Richard Trevithick, a British engineer born in Cornwall. This used high-pressure steam to drive the engine by one power stroke. The transmission system employed a large flywheel to even out the action of the piston rod. On 21 February 1804, the world's first steam-powered railway journey took place when Trevithick's unnamed steam locomotive hauled a train along the tramway of the Penydarren ironworks, near Merthyr Tydfil in South Wales.[37][38] Trevithick later demonstrated a locomotive operating upon a piece of circular rail track in Bloomsbury, London, the Catch Me Who Can, but never got beyond the experimental stage with railway locomotives, not least because his engines were too heavy for the cast-iron plateway track then in use.[39]
The first commercially successful steam locomotive was Matthew Murray's rack locomotive Salamanca built for the Middleton Railway in Leeds in 1812. This twin-cylinder locomotive was light enough to not break the edge-rails track and solved the problem of adhesion by a cog-wheel using teeth cast on the side of one of the rails. Thus it was also the first rack railway.
This was followed in 1813 by the locomotive Puffing Billy built by Christopher Blackett and William Hedley for the Wylam Colliery Railway, the first successful locomotive running by adhesion only. This was accomplished by the distribution of weight between a number of wheels. Puffing Billy is now on display in the Science Museum in London, and is the oldest locomotive in existence.[40][41]
In 1814, George Stephenson, inspired by the early locomotives of Trevithick, Murray and Hedley, persuaded the manager of the Killingworth colliery where he worked to allow him to build a steam-powered machine. Stephenson played a pivotal role in the development and widespread adoption of the steam locomotive. His designs considerably improved on the work of the earlier pioneers. He built the locomotive Blücher, also a successful flanged-wheel adhesion locomotive. In 1825 he built the locomotive Locomotion for the Stockton and Darlington Railway in the northeast of England, which became the first public steam railway in the world in 1825, although it used both horse power and steam power on different runs. In 1829, he built the locomotive Rocket, which entered in and won the Rainhill Trials. This success led to Stephenson establishing his company as the pre-eminent builder of steam locomotives for railways in Great Britain and Ireland, the United States, and much of Europe.[42]: 24–30 The first public railway which used only steam locomotives, all the time, was Liverpool and Manchester Railway, built in 1830.[43]
Steam power continued to be the dominant power system in railways around the world for more than a century.
Electric power introduced
[edit]
The first known electric locomotive was built in 1837 by chemist Robert Davidson of Aberdeen in Scotland, and it was powered by galvanic cells (batteries). Thus it was also the earliest battery-electric locomotive. Davidson later built a larger locomotive named Galvani, exhibited at the Royal Scottish Society of Arts Exhibition in 1841. The seven-ton vehicle had two direct-drive reluctance motors, with fixed electromagnets acting on iron bars attached to a wooden cylinder on each axle, and simple commutators. It hauled a load of six tons at four miles per hour (6 kilometres per hour) for a distance of one and a half miles (2.4 kilometres). It was tested on the Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway in September of the following year, but the limited power from batteries prevented its general use. It was destroyed by railway workers, who saw it as a threat to their job security.[44][45][46] By the middle of the nineteenth century most european countries had military uses for railways.[47]
Werner von Siemens demonstrated an electric railway in 1879 in Berlin. The world's first electric tram line, Gross-Lichterfelde Tramway, opened in Lichterfelde near Berlin, Germany, in 1881. It was built by Siemens. The tram ran on 180 volts DC, which was supplied by running rails. In 1891 the track was equipped with an overhead wire and the line was extended to Berlin-Lichterfelde West station. The Volk's Electric Railway opened in 1883 in Brighton, England. The railway is still operational, thus making it the oldest operational electric railway in the world. Also in 1883, Mödling and Hinterbrühl Tram opened near Vienna in Austria. It was the first tram line in the world in regular service powered from an overhead line. Five years later, in the US electric trolleys were pioneered in 1888 on the Richmond Union Passenger Railway, using equipment designed by Frank J. Sprague.[48]
The first use of electrification on a main line was on a four-mile section of the Baltimore Belt Line of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (B&O) in 1895 connecting the main portion of the B&O to the new line to New York through a series of tunnels around the edges of Baltimore's downtown. Electricity quickly became the power supply of choice for subways, abetted by the Sprague's invention of multiple-unit train control in 1897. By the early 1900s most street railways were electrified.

The London Underground, the world's oldest underground railway, opened in 1863, and it began operating electric services using a fourth rail system in 1890 on the City and South London Railway, now part of the London Underground Northern line. This was the first major railway to use electric traction. The world's first deep-level electric railway, it runs from the City of London, under the River Thames, to Stockwell in south London.[49]
The first practical AC electric locomotive was designed by Charles Brown, then working for Oerlikon, Zürich. In 1891, Brown had demonstrated long-distance power transmission, using three-phase AC, between a hydro-electric plant at Lauffen am Neckar and Frankfurt am Main West, a distance of 280 km (170 mi). Using experience he had gained while working for Jean Heilmann on steam–electric locomotive designs, Brown observed that three-phase motors had a higher power-to-weight ratio than DC motors and, because of the absence of a commutator, were simpler to manufacture and maintain.[b] However, they were much larger than the DC motors of the time and could not be mounted in underfloor bogies: they could only be carried within locomotive bodies.[51]
In 1894, Hungarian engineer Kálmán Kandó developed a new type 3-phase asynchronous electric drive motors and generators for electric locomotives. Kandó's early 1894 designs were first applied in a short three-phase AC tramway in Évian-les-Bains (France), which was constructed between 1896 and 1898.[52][53]
In 1896, Oerlikon installed the first commercial example of the system on the Lugano Tramway. Each 30-tonne locomotive had two 110 kW (150 hp) motors run by three-phase 750 V 40 Hz fed from double overhead lines. Three-phase motors run at a constant speed and provide regenerative braking, and are well suited to steeply graded routes, and the first main-line three-phase locomotives were supplied by Brown (by then in partnership with Walter Boveri) in 1899 on the 40 km Burgdorf–Thun line, Switzerland.

Italian railways were the first in the world to introduce electric traction for the entire length of a main line rather than a short section. The 106 km Valtellina line was opened on 4 September 1902, designed by Kandó and a team from the Ganz works.[54][55] The electrical system was three-phase at 3 kV 15 Hz. In 1918,[56] Kandó invented and developed the rotary phase converter, enabling electric locomotives to use three-phase motors whilst supplied via a single overhead wire, carrying the simple industrial frequency (50 Hz) single phase AC of the high-voltage national networks.[55]
An important contribution to the wider adoption of AC traction came from SNCF of France after World War II. The company conducted trials at AC 50 Hz, and established it as a standard. Following SNCF's successful trials, 50 Hz, now also called industrial frequency was adopted as standard for main-lines across the world.[57]
Diesel power introduced
[edit]
Earliest recorded examples of an internal combustion engine for railway use included a prototype designed by William Dent Priestman. Sir William Thomson examined it in 1888 and described it as a "Priestman oil engine mounted upon a truck which is worked on a temporary line of rails to show the adaptation of a petroleum engine for locomotive purposes."[58][59] In 1894, a 20 hp (15 kW) two axle machine built by Priestman Brothers was used on the Hull Docks.[60]
In 1906, Rudolf Diesel, Adolf Klose and the steam and diesel engine manufacturer Gebrüder Sulzer founded Diesel-Sulzer-Klose GmbH to manufacture diesel-powered locomotives. Sulzer had been manufacturing diesel engines since 1898. The Prussian State Railways ordered a diesel locomotive from the company in 1909. The world's first diesel-powered locomotive was operated in the summer of 1912 on the Winterthur–Romanshorn railway in Switzerland, but was not a commercial success.[61] The locomotive weight was 95 tonnes and the power was 883 kW with a maximum speed of 100 km/h (62 mph).[62] Small numbers of prototype diesel locomotives were produced in a number of countries through the mid-1920s. The Soviet Union operated three experimental units of different designs since late 1925, though only one of them (the E el-2) proved technically viable.[63]
A significant breakthrough occurred in 1914, when Hermann Lemp, a General Electric electrical engineer, developed and patented a reliable direct current electrical control system (subsequent improvements were also patented by Lemp).[64] Lemp's design used a single lever to control both engine and generator in a coordinated fashion, and was the prototype for all diesel–electric locomotive control systems. In 1914, world's first functional diesel–electric railcars were produced for the Königlich-Sächsische Staatseisenbahnen (Royal Saxon State Railways) by Waggonfabrik Rastatt with electric equipment from Brown, Boveri & Cie and diesel engines from Swiss Sulzer AG. They were classified as DET 1 and DET 2 (de.wiki). The first regular used diesel–electric locomotives were switcher (shunter) locomotives. General Electric produced several small switching locomotives in the 1930s (the famous "44-tonner" switcher was introduced in 1940) Westinghouse Electric and Baldwin collaborated to build switching locomotives starting in 1929.
In 1929, the Canadian National Railways became the first North American railway to use diesels in mainline service with two units, 9000 and 9001, from Westinghouse.[65]
High-speed rail
[edit]Although steam and diesel services reaching speeds up to 200 km/h (120 mph) were started before the 1960s in Europe, they were not very successful.

The first electrified high-speed rail Tōkaidō Shinkansen was introduced in 1964 between Tokyo and Osaka in Japan. Since then high-speed rail transport, functioning at speeds up to and above 300 km/h (190 mph), has been built in Japan, Spain, France, Germany, Italy, the People's Republic of China, Taiwan (Republic of China), the United Kingdom, South Korea, Scandinavia, Belgium and the Netherlands. The construction of many of these lines has resulted in the dramatic decline of short-haul flights and automotive traffic between connected cities, such as the London–Paris–Brussels corridor, Madrid–Barcelona, Milan–Rome–Naples, as well as many other major lines.[citation needed]
High-speed trains normally operate on standard gauge tracks of continuously welded rail on grade-separated right-of-way that incorporates a large turning radius in its design. While high-speed rail is most often designed for passenger travel, some high-speed systems also offer freight service.
Preservation
[edit]Since 1980, rail transport has changed dramatically, but a number of heritage railways continue to operate as part of living history to preserve and maintain old railway lines for services of tourist trains.
Trains
[edit]A train is a connected series of rail vehicles that move along the track, most commonly through adhesion traction. Propulsion for the train is provided by a separate locomotive or from individual motors in self-propelled multiple units. Most trains carry a revenue load, although non-revenue cars exist for the railway's own use, such as for maintenance-of-way purposes. The engine driver (engineer in North America) controls the locomotive or other power cars, although people movers and some rapid transits are under automatic control.
Haulage
[edit]
Traditionally, trains are pulled using a locomotive. This involves one or more powered vehicles being located at the front of the train, providing sufficient tractive force to haul the weight of the full train. This arrangement remains dominant for freight trains and is often used for passenger trains. A push–pull train has the end passenger car equipped with a driver's cab so that the engine driver can remotely control the locomotive. This allows one of the locomotive-hauled train's drawbacks to be removed, since the locomotive need not be moved to the front of the train each time the train changes direction. A railroad car is a vehicle used for the haulage of either passengers or freight.
A multiple unit has powered wheels throughout the whole train. These are used for rapid transit and tram systems, as well as many both short- and long-haul passenger trains. A railcar is a single, self-powered car, and may be electrically propelled or powered by a diesel engine. Multiple units have a driver's cab at each end of the unit, and were developed following the ability to build electric motors and other engines small enough to fit under the coach. There are only a few freight multiple units, most of which are high-speed post trains.
Motive power
[edit]Steam locomotives are locomotives with a steam engine that provides adhesion. Coal, petroleum, or wood is burned in a firebox, boiling water in the boiler to create pressurized steam. The steam travels through the smokebox before leaving via the chimney or smoke stack. In the process, it powers a piston that transmits power directly through a connecting rod (US: main rod) and a crankpin (US: wristpin) on the driving wheel (US main driver) or to a crank on a driving axle. Steam locomotives have been phased out in most parts of the world for economical and safety reasons, although many are preserved in working order by heritage railways.
Electric locomotives draw power from a stationary source via an overhead wire or third rail. Some also or instead use a battery. In locomotives that are powered by high-voltage alternating current, a transformer in the locomotive converts the high-voltage low-current power to low-voltage high current used in the traction motors that power the wheels. Modern locomotives may use three-phase AC induction motors or direct current motors. Under certain conditions, electric locomotives are the most powerful traction.[citation needed] They are also the cheapest to run and provide less noise and no local air pollution.[citation needed] However, they require high capital investments both for the overhead lines and the supporting infrastructure, as well as the generating station that is needed to produce electricity. Accordingly, electric traction is used on urban systems, lines with high traffic and for high-speed rail.[citation needed]
Diesel locomotives use a diesel engine as the prime mover. The energy transmission may be either diesel–electric, diesel-mechanical or diesel–hydraulic but diesel–electric is dominant. Electro-diesel locomotives are built to run as diesel–electric on unelectrified sections and as electric locomotives on electrified sections.[citation needed]
Alternative methods of motive power include magnetic levitation, horse-drawn, cable, rack and pinion, gravity, pneumatics and gas turbine.[citation needed]
Passenger trains
[edit]
A passenger train stops at stations where passengers may embark and disembark. The oversight of the train is the duty of a guard/train manager/conductor. Passenger trains are part of public transport and often make up the stem of the service, with buses feeding to stations. Passenger trains provide long-distance intercity travel, daily commuter trips, or local urban transit services, operating with a diversity of vehicles, operating speeds, right-of-way requirements, and service frequency (in Europe, operaters use train categories accordingly). Service frequencies are often expressed as a number of trains per hour (tph).[66] Passenger trains can usually be into two types of operation, intercity railway and intracity transit. Whereas intercity railway involve higher speeds, longer routes, and lower frequency (usually scheduled), intracity transit involves lower speeds, shorter routes, and higher frequency (especially during peak hours).[67]
Intercity trains are long-haul trains that operate with few stops between cities. Trains typically have amenities such as a dining car. Some lines also provide over-night services with sleeping cars. Some long-haul trains have been given a specific name. Regional trains are medium distance trains that connect cities with outlying, surrounding areas, or provide a regional service, making more stops and having lower speeds. Commuter trains serve suburbs of urban areas, providing a daily commuting service. Airport rail links provide quick access from city centres to airports.

High-speed rail are special inter-city trains that operate at much higher speeds than conventional railways, the limit being regarded at 200 to 350 kilometres per hour (120 to 220 mph). High-speed trains are used mostly for long-haul service and most systems are in Western Europe and East Asia. Magnetic levitation trains such as the Shanghai maglev train use under-riding magnets which attract themselves upward towards the underside of a guideway and this line has achieved somewhat higher peak speeds in day-to-day operation than conventional high-speed railways, although only over short distances. Due to their heightened speeds, route alignments for high-speed rail tend to have broader curves than conventional railways, but may have steeper grades that are more easily climbed by trains with large kinetic energy.
High kinetic energy translates to higher horsepower-to-ton ratios (e.g. 20 horsepower per short ton or 16 kilowatts per tonne); this allows trains to accelerate and maintain higher speeds and negotiate steep grades as momentum builds up and recovered in downgrades (reducing cut and fill and tunnelling requirements). Since lateral forces act on curves, curvatures are designed with the highest possible radius. All these features are dramatically different from freight operations, thus justifying exclusive high-speed rail lines if it is economically feasible.[67]
Higher-speed rail services are intercity rail services that have top speeds higher than conventional intercity trains but the speeds are not as high as those in the high-speed rail services. These services are provided after improvements to the conventional rail infrastructure to support trains that can operate safely at higher speeds.
Urban rail
[edit]Rapid transit refers to systems built in large cities and has the highest capacity of any passenger transport system. It is grade-separated and commonly built underground or elevated. Due to the lack of uniformity of rapid transit systems, route alignment varies, with diverse rights-of-way (private land, side of road, street median) and geometric characteristics (sharp or broad curves, steep or gentle grades). For instance, the Chicago 'L' trains are designed with extremely short cars to negotiate the sharp curves in the Loop. New Jersey's PATH has similar-sized cars to accommodate curves in the trans-Hudson tunnels. San Francisco's BART operates large cars on its routes.[67]
At street level, smaller trams can be used. Light rail systems use upgraded tram technology that have their own right-of-way and sometimes sections underground. Monorail systems are elevated, medium-capacity systems. A people mover is a driver-less, grade-separated vehicle that serves only a few stations, often as a shuttle or in a loop. Systems with larger capacity are designated automated guideway transit.
Freight trains
[edit]
Freight trains carry cargo using freight cars specialized for the type of goods. Freight trains are very efficient, with economy of scale and high energy efficiency.[68] However, their use can be reduced by lack of flexibility, if there is need of transshipment at both ends of the trip due to lack of tracks to the points of pick-up and delivery. Authorities often encourage the use of cargo rail transport due to its efficiency and to reduce road traffic.[69]
Container trains have become widely used in many places for general freight, particularly in North America, where double stacking reduces costs. Containers can easily be transshipped between other modes, such as ships and trucks, and at breaks of gauge. Containers have succeeded the boxcar (wagon-load), where the cargo had to be loaded and unloaded into the train manually. The intermodal containerization of cargo has revolutionized the supply chain logistics industry, reducing shipping costs significantly. In Europe, the sliding wall wagon has largely superseded the ordinary covered wagons. Other types of cars include refrigerator cars, stock cars for livestock and autoracks for road vehicles. When rail is combined with road transport, a roadrailer will allow trailers to be driven onto the train, allowing for easy transition between road and rail.
Bulk handling represents a key advantage for rail transport. Low or even zero transshipment costs combined with energy efficiency and low inventory costs allow trains to handle bulk much cheaper than by road. Typical bulk cargo includes coal, ore, grains and liquids. Bulk is transported in open-topped cars, hopper cars and tank cars.
Metros
[edit]

Rapid transit or mass rapid transit (MRT) or heavy rail,[71][72] commonly referred to as metro, is a type of high-capacity public transport that is generally built in urban areas. A grade separated rapid transit line below ground surface through a tunnel can be regionally called a subway, tube, metro or underground.[73][74][75][76] They are sometimes grade-separated on elevated railways, in which case some are referred to as el trains – short for "elevated" – or skytrains. Rapid transit systems are usually electric railways, that unlike buses or trams operate on an exclusive right-of-way, which cannot be accessed by pedestrians or other vehicles.[77]
Modern services on rapid transit systems are provided on designated lines between stations typically using electric multiple units on railway tracks. Some systems use guided rubber tires, magnetic levitation (maglev), or monorail. The stations typically have high platforms, without steps inside the trains, requiring custom-made trains in order to minimize gaps between train and platform. They are typically integrated with other public transport and often operated by the same public transport authorities. Some rapid transit systems have at-grade intersections between a rapid transit line and a road or between two rapid transit lines.[78]
The world's first rapid transit system was the partially underground Metropolitan Railway which opened in 1863 using steam locomotives, and now forms part of the London Underground.[79] In 1868, New York opened the elevated West Side and Yonkers Patent Railway, initially a cable-hauled line using stationary steam engines.
As of 2021[update], China has the largest number of rapid transit systems in the world – 40 in number,[80] running on over 4,500 km (2,800 mi) of track – and was responsible for most of the world's rapid-transit expansion in the 2010s.[81][82][83] The world's longest single-operator rapid transit system by route length is the Shanghai Metro.[84][85] The world's largest single rapid transit service provider by number of stations (472 stations in total)[86] is the New York City Subway. The busiest rapid transit systems in the world by annual ridership are the Shanghai Metro, Tokyo subway system, Seoul Metro and the Moscow Metro.
Infrastructure
[edit]
Right-of-way
[edit]Railway tracks are laid upon land owned or leased by the railway company. Owing to the desirability of maintaining modest grades, in hilly or mountainous terrain rails will often be laid in circuitous routes. Route length and grade requirements can be reduced by the use of alternating cuttings, bridges and tunnels – all of which can greatly increase the capital expenditures required to develop a right-of-way, while significantly reducing operating costs and allowing higher speeds on longer radius curves. In densely urbanized areas, railways are sometimes laid in tunnels to minimize the effects on existing properties.
Track
[edit]Track consists of two parallel steel rails, anchored perpendicular to members called sleepers (ties) of timber, concrete, steel, or plastic to maintain a consistent distance apart, or rail gauge. Other variations are also possible, such as "slab track", in which the rails are fastened to a concrete foundation resting on a prepared subsurface.
Rail gauges are usually categorized as standard gauge (used on approximately 70% of the world's existing railway lines), broad gauge, and narrow gauge.[87] In addition to the rail gauge, the tracks will be laid to conform with a loading gauge which defines the maximum height and width for railway vehicles and their loads to ensure safe passage through bridges, tunnels and other structures.
The track guides the conical, flanged wheels, keeping the cars on the track without active steering and therefore allowing trains to be much longer than road vehicles. The rails and ties are usually placed on a foundation made of compressed earth on top of which is placed a bed of ballast to distribute the load from the ties and to prevent the track from buckling as the ground settles over time under the weight of the vehicles passing above.
The ballast also serves as a means of drainage. Some more modern track in special areas is attached directly without ballast. Track may be prefabricated or assembled in place. By welding rails together to form lengths of continuous welded rail, additional wear and tear on rolling stock caused by the small surface gap at the joints between rails can be counteracted; this also makes for a quieter ride.
On curves, the outer rail may be at a higher level than the inner rail. This is called superelevation or cant. This reduces the forces tending to displace the track and makes for a more comfortable ride for standing livestock and standing or seated passengers. A given amount of superelevation is most effective over a limited range of speeds.
Points and switches—also known as turnouts—are the means of directing a train onto a diverging section of track. Laid similar to normal track, a point typically consists of a frog (common crossing), check rails and two switch rails. The switch rails may be moved left or right, under the control of the signalling system, to determine which path the train will follow.
Spikes in wooden ties can loosen over time, but split and rotten ties may be individually replaced with new wooden ties or concrete substitutes. Concrete ties can also develop cracks or splits, and can also be replaced individually. Should the rails settle due to soil subsidence, they can be lifted by specialized machinery and additional ballast tamped under the ties to level the rails.
Periodically, ballast must be removed and replaced with clean ballast to ensure adequate drainage. Culverts and other passages for water must be kept clear lest water is impounded by the trackbed, causing landslips. Where trackbeds are placed along rivers, additional protection is usually placed to prevent streambank erosion during times of high water. Bridges require inspection and maintenance, since they are subject to large surges of stress in a short period of time when a heavy train crosses.
Gauge incompatibility
[edit]The use of different track gauges in different regions of the world, and sometimes within the same country, can impede the movement of passengers and freight. Often elaborate transfer mechanisms are installed where two lines of different gauge meet to facilitate movement across the break of gauge. Countries with multiple gauges in use, such as India and Australia, have invested heavily to unify their rail networks. China is developing a modernized Eurasian Land Bridge to move goods by rail to Western Europe.
Train inspection systems
[edit]
The inspection of railway equipment is essential for the safe movement of trains. Many types of defect detectors are in use on the world's railroads. These devices use technologies that vary from a simplistic paddle and switch to infrared and laser scanning, and even ultrasonic audio analysis. Their use has avoided many rail accidents over the 70 years they have been used.
Signalling
[edit]
Railway signalling is a system used to control railway traffic safely to prevent trains from colliding. Being guided by fixed rails which generate low friction, trains are uniquely susceptible to collision since they frequently operate at speeds that do not enable them to stop quickly or within the driver's sighting distance; road vehicles, which encounter a higher level of friction between their rubber tyres and the road surface, have much shorter braking distances. Most forms of train control involve movement authority being passed from those responsible for each section of a rail network to the train crew. Not all methods require the use of signals, and some systems are specific to single track railways.
The signalling process is traditionally carried out in a signal box, a small building that houses the lever frame required for the signalman to operate switches and signal equipment. These are placed at various intervals along the route of a railway, controlling specified sections of track. More recent technological developments have made such operational doctrine superfluous, with the centralization of signalling operations to regional control rooms. This has been facilitated by the increased use of computers, allowing vast sections of track to be monitored from a single location. The common method of block signalling divides the track into zones guarded by combinations of block signals, operating rules, and automatic-control devices so that only one train may be in a block at any time.
Electrification
[edit]The electrification system provides electrical energy to the trains, so they can operate without a prime mover on board. This allows lower operating costs, but requires large capital investments along the lines. Mainline and tram systems normally have overhead wires, which hang from poles along the line. Grade-separated rapid transit sometimes use a ground third rail.
Power may be fed as direct (DC) or alternating current (AC). The most common DC voltages are 600 and 750 V for tram and rapid transit systems, and 1,500 and 3,000 V for mainlines. The two dominant AC systems are 15 kV and 25 kV.
Stations
[edit]
A railway station serves as an area where passengers can board and alight from trains. A goods station is a yard which is exclusively used for loading and unloading cargo. Large passenger stations have at least one building providing conveniences for passengers, such as purchasing tickets and food. Smaller stations typically only consist of a platform. Early stations were sometimes built with both passenger and goods facilities.[88]
Platforms are used to allow easy access to the trains, and are connected to each other via underpasses, footbridges and level crossings. Some large stations are built as culs-de-sac, with trains only operating out from one direction. Smaller stations normally serve local residential areas, and may have connection to feeder bus services. Large stations, in particular central stations, serve as the main public transport hub for the city, and have transfer available between rail services, and to rapid transit, tram or bus services.
Operations
[edit]Ownership
[edit]Since the 1980s, there has been an increasing trend to split up railway companies, with companies owning the rolling stock separated from those owning the infrastructure. This is particularly true in Europe, where this arrangement is required by the European Union. This has allowed open access by any train operator to any portion of the European railway network. In the UK, the railway track is state owned, with a public controlled body (Network Rail) running, maintaining and developing the track, while Train Operating Companies have run the trains since privatization in the 1990s.[89]
In the US, virtually all rail networks and infrastructure outside the Northeast corridor are privately owned by freight lines. Passenger lines, primarily Amtrak, operate as tenants on the freight lines. Consequently, operations must be closely synchronized and coordinated between freight and passenger railroads, with passenger trains often being dispatched by the host freight railroad. Due to this shared system, both are regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and may follow the AREMA recommended practices for track work and AAR standards for vehicles.[67]
Financing
[edit]The main source of income for railway companies is from ticket revenue (for passenger transport) and shipment fees for cargo.[90][91] Discounts and monthly passes are sometimes available for frequent travellers (e.g. season ticket and rail pass). Freight revenue may be sold per container slot or for a whole train. Sometimes, the shipper owns the cars and only rents the haulage. For passenger transport, advertisement income can be significant.
Governments may choose to give subsidies to rail operation, since rail transport has fewer externalities than other dominant modes of transport. If the railway company is state-owned, the state may simply provide direct subsidies in exchange for increased production. If operations have been privatized, several options are available. Some countries have a system where the infrastructure is owned by a government agency or company – with open access to the tracks for any company that meets safety requirements. In such cases, the state may choose to provide the tracks free of charge, or for a fee that does not cover all costs. This is seen as analogous to the government providing free access to roads. For passenger operations, a direct subsidy may be paid to a public-owned operator, or public service obligation tender may be held, and a time-limited contract awarded to the lowest bidder. Total EU rail subsidies amounted to €73 billion in 2005.[92]
Via Rail Canada and US passenger rail service Amtrak are private railroad companies chartered by their respective national governments. As private passenger services declined because of competition from cars and airlines, they became shareholders of Amtrak either with a cash entrance fee or relinquishing their locomotives and rolling stock. The government subsidizes Amtrak by supplying start-up capital and making up for losses at the end of the fiscal year.[93][page needed]
Safety
[edit]
Some trains travel faster than road vehicles. They are heavy and unable to deviate from the track, and have longer stopping distances. Possible accidents include derailment (jumping the track) and collisions with another train or a road vehicle, or with pedestrians at level crossings, which account for the majority of all rail accidents and casualties. To minimize the risk, the most important safety measures are strict operating rules, e.g. railway signalling, and gates or grade separation at crossings. Train whistles, bells, or horns warn of the presence of a train, while trackside signals maintain the distances between trains. Another method used to increase safety is the addition of platform screen doors to separate the platform from train tracks. These prevent unauthorized incursion on to the train tracks which can result in accidents that cause serious harm or death, as well as providing other benefits such as preventing litter build up on the tracks which can pose a fire risk.
On many high-speed inter-city networks, such as Japan's Shinkansen, the trains run on dedicated railway lines without any level crossings. This is an important element in the safety of the system as it effectively eliminates the potential for collision with automobiles, other vehicles, or pedestrians, and greatly reduces the probability of collision with other trains. Another benefit is that services on the inter-city network remain punctual.
Maintenance
[edit]As in any infrastructure asset, railways must keep up with periodic inspection and maintenance to minimize the effect of infrastructure failures that can disrupt freight revenue operations and passenger services. Because passengers are considered the most crucial cargo and usually operate at higher speeds, steeper grades, and higher capacity/frequency, their lines are especially important. Inspection practices include track geometry cars or walking inspection. Curve maintenance especially for transit services includes gauging, fastener tightening, and rail replacement.
Rail corrugation is a common issue with transit systems due to the high number of light-axle, wheel passages which result in grinding of the wheel/rail interface. Since maintenance may overlap with operations, maintenance windows (nighttime hours, off-peak hours, altering train schedules or routes) must be closely followed. In addition, passenger safety during maintenance work (inter-track fencing, proper storage of materials, track work notices, hazards of equipment near states) must be regarded at all times. At times, maintenance access problems can emerge due to tunnels, elevated structures, and congested cityscapes. Here, specialized equipment or smaller versions of conventional maintenance gear are used.[67]
Unlike highways or road networks where capacity is disaggregated into unlinked trips over individual route segments, railway capacity is fundamentally considered a network system. As a result, many components are causes and effects of system disruptions. Maintenance must acknowledge the vast array of a route's performance (type of train service, origination/destination, seasonal impacts), a line's capacity (length, terrain, number of tracks, types of train control), trains throughput (max speeds, acceleration/ deceleration rates), and service features with shared passenger-freight tracks (sidings, terminal capacities, switching routes, and design type).[67]
Social, economic, and energy aspects
[edit]Energy
[edit]Transport by rail is an energy-efficient[96] but capital-intensive[97] means of mechanized land transport. The tracks provide smooth and hard surfaces on which the wheels of the train can roll with a relatively low level of friction.
A typical modern wagon can hold up to 113 tonnes (125 short tons) of freight on two four-wheel bogies. The track distributes the weight of the train evenly, allowing significantly greater loads per axle and wheel than in road transport, leading to greater energy efficiency. Trains have a smaller frontal area in relation to the load they are carrying, which reduces air resistance and thus energy usage.
In addition, the presence of track guiding the wheels allows for very long trains to be pulled by one or a few engines and driven by a single operator, even around curves, which allows for economies of scale in both manpower and energy use; by contrast, in road transport, more than two articulations causes fishtailing and makes the vehicle unsafe.
Energy efficiency
[edit]Considering only the energy spent to move the means of transport, and using the example of the urban area of Lisbon, electric trains seem to be on average 20 times more efficient than automobiles for transportation of passengers, if we consider energy spent per passenger-distance with similar occupation ratios.[98] Considering an automobile with a consumption of around 6 L/100 km (47 mpg‑imp; 39 mpg‑US) of fuel, the average car in Europe has an occupancy of around 1.2 passengers per automobile (occupation ratio around 24%) and that one litre of fuel amounts to about 8.8 kWh (32 MJ), equating to an average of 441 Wh (1,590 kJ) per passenger-km. This compares to a modern train with an average occupancy of 20% and a consumption of about 8.5 kW⋅h/km (31 MJ/km; 13.7 kW⋅h/mi), equating to 21.5 Wh (77 kJ) per passenger-km, 20 times less than the automobile.
Usage
[edit]
Due to these benefits, rail transport is a major form of passenger and freight transport in many countries.[97] It is ubiquitous in Europe, with an integrated network covering virtually the whole continent. In India, China, South Korea and Japan, many millions use trains as regular transport. In North America, freight rail transport is widespread and heavily used, but intercity passenger rail transport is relatively scarce outside the Northeast Corridor, due to increased preference of other modes, particularly automobiles and aeroplanes.[93][page needed][99] However, implementing new and improved ways such as making it easily accessible within neighbourhoods can aid in reducing commuters from using private vehicles and aeroplanes.[100]
South Africa, northern Africa and Argentina have extensive rail networks, but some railways elsewhere in Africa and South America are isolated lines. Australia has a generally sparse network befitting its population density but has some areas with significant networks, especially in the southeast. In addition to the previously existing east–west transcontinental line in Australia, a line from north to south has been constructed. The highest railway in the world is the line to Lhasa, in Tibet,[101] partly running over permafrost territory. Western Europe has the highest railway density in the world and many individual trains there operate through several countries despite technical and organizational differences in each national network.
Social and economic impact
[edit]Modernization
[edit]Historically, railways have been considered central to modernity and ideas of progress.[102] The process of modernization in the 19th century involved a transition from a spatially oriented world to a time-oriented world. Timekeeping became of heightened importance, resulting in clock towers for railway stations, clocks in public places, and pocket watches for railway workers and travellers. Trains followed exact schedules and never left early, whereas in the premodern era, passenger ships left whenever the captain had enough passengers. In the premodern era, local time was set at noon, when the sun was at its highest; this changed with the introduction of standard time zones. Printed timetables were a convenience for travellers, but more elaborate timetables, called train orders, were essential for train crews, the maintenance workers, the station personnel, and for the repair and maintenance crews. The structure of railway timetables were later adapted for different uses, such as schedules for buses, ferries, and aeroplanes, for radio and television programmes, for school schedules, and for factory time clocks.[103]
The invention of the electrical telegraph in the early 19th century also was crucial for the development and operation of railroad networks. If bad weather disrupted the system, telegraphers relayed immediate corrections and updates throughout the system. Additionally, most railroads were single-track, with sidings and signals to allow lower priority trains to be sidetracked and have scheduled meets.
Nation-building
[edit]Scholars have linked railroads to successful nation-building efforts by states.[104]
Model of corporate management
[edit]According to historian Henry Adams, a railroad network needed:
- the energies of a generation, for it required all the new machinery to be created – capital, banks, mines, furnaces, shops, power-houses, technical knowledge, mechanical population, together with a steady remodelling of social and political habits, ideas, and institutions to fit the new scale and suit the new conditions. The generation between 1865 and 1895 was already mortgaged to the railways, and no one knew it better than the generation itself.[105]
The impact can be examined through five aspects: shipping, finance, management, careers, and popular reaction.
Shipping freight and passengers
[edit]Railroads form an efficient network for shipping freight and passengers across a large national market; their development thus was beneficial to many aspects of a nation's economy, including manufacturing, retail and wholesale, agriculture, and finance. By the 1940s, the United States had an integrated national market comparable in size to that of Europe, but free of internal barriers or tariffs, and supported by a common language, financial system, and legal system.[106]
Financial system
[edit]Financing of railroads provided the basis for a dramatic expansion of the private (non-governmental) financial system. Construction of railroads was far more expensive than factories: in 1860, the combined total of railroad stocks and bonds was $1.8 billion; in 1897, it reached $10.6 billion (compared to a total national debt of $1.2 billion).[107]
Funding came from financiers in the Northeastern United States and from Europe, especially Britain.[108] About 10 per cent of the funding came from the government, particularly in the form of land grants that were realized upon completion of a certain amount of trackage.[109] The emerging American financial system was based on railroad bonds, and by 1860, New York was the dominant financial market. The British invested heavily in railroads around the world, but nowhere more than in the United States; the total bond value reached about $3 billion by 1914. However, in 1914–1917, the British liquidated their American assets to pay for war supplies.[110][111]
Modern management
[edit]Railroad management designed complex systems that could handle far more complicated simultaneous relationships than those common in other industries at the time. Civil engineers became the senior management of railroads. The leading American innovators were the Western Railroad of Massachusetts and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad in the 1840s, the Erie Railroad in the 1850s, and the Pennsylvania Railroad in the 1860s.[112]
Career paths
[edit]The development of railroads led to the emergence of private-sector careers for both blue-collar workers and white-collar workers. Railroading became a lifetime career for young men; women were almost never hired. A typical career path would see a young man hired at age 18 as a shop labourer, be promoted to skilled mechanic at age 24, brakemen at 25, freight conductor at 27, and passenger conductor at age 57. White-collar career paths likewise were delineated: educated young men started in clerical or statistical work and moved up to station agents or bureaucrats at the divisional or central headquarters, acquiring additional knowledge, experience, and human capital at each level. Being very hard to replace, they were virtually guaranteed permanent jobs and provided with insurance and medical care.
Hiring, firing, and wage rates were set not by foremen, but by central administrators, to minimize favouritism and personality conflicts. Everything was done by the book, whereby an increasingly complex set of rules dictated to everyone exactly what should be done in every circumstance, and exactly what their rank and pay would be. By the 1880s, career railroaders began retiring, and pension systems were invented for them.[113]
Transportation
[edit]Railways contribute to social vibrancy and economic competitiveness by transporting multitudes of customers and workers to city centres and inner suburbs. Hong Kong has recognized rail as "the backbone of the public transit system" and as such developed their franchised bus system and road infrastructure in comprehensive alignment with their rail services.[114] China's large cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou recognize rail transit lines as the framework and bus lines as the main body to their metropolitan transportation systems.[115] The Japanese Shinkansen was built to meet the growing traffic demand in the "heart of Japan's industry and economy" situated on the Tokyo-Kobe line.[116]
Military role
[edit]
Rail transport can be important for military activity. During the 1860s, railways provided a means for rapid movement of troops and supplies during the American Civil War,[117] as well as in the Austro-Prussian and Franco-Prussian Wars[118] Throughout the 20th century, rail was a key element of war plans for rapid military mobilization, allowing for the quick and efficient transport of large numbers of reservists to their mustering-points, and infantry soldiers to the front lines.[119] So-called strategic railways were or are constructed for a primarily military purpose. The Western Front in France during World War I required many trainloads of munitions a day.[120] Conversely, owing to their strategic value, rail yards and bridges in Germany and occupied France were major targets of Allied air raids during World War II.[121] Rail transport and infrastructure continues to play an important role in present-day conflicts like the Russian invasion of Ukraine, where sabotage of railways in Belarus and in Russia also influenced the course of the war.
Positive impacts
[edit]Railways channel growth towards dense city agglomerations and along their arteries.[citation needed] This contrasts with highway expansion, indicative of the US transportation policy post-World War II, which instead encourages development of suburbs at the periphery of metropolitan areas, contributing to increased vehicle miles travelled, carbon emissions, development of greenfield spaces, and depletion of natural reserves.[dubious – discuss][citation needed] These arrangements revalue city spaces, local taxes,[122] housing values, and promotion of mixed use development.[123][124]
Negative impacts
[edit]There has also been some opposition to the development of railway networks. For instance, the arrival of railways and steam locomotives to Austria during the 1840s angered locals because of the noise, smell, and pollution caused by the trains and the damage to homes and the surrounding land caused by the engine's soot and fiery embers; and since most travel did not occur over long distances, few people utilized the new line.[125]
Pollution
[edit]A 2018 study found that the opening of the Beijing Subway caused a reduction in "most of the air pollutants concentrations (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and CO) but had little effect on ozone pollution."[126]
Modern rail as economic development indicator
[edit]European development economists have argued that the existence of modern rail infrastructure is a significant indicator of a country's economic advancement: this perspective is illustrated notably through the Basic Rail Transportation Infrastructure Index (known as BRTI Index).[127]
Subsidies
[edit]China
[edit]In 2010, annual rail spending in China was ¥840 billion (US$178 billion in 2023), from 2014 to 2017 China had an annual target of ¥800 billion (US$168 billion in 2023) and planned to spend ¥3.5 trillion (US$31 trillion in 2023) over 2016–2020.[128]
India
[edit]The Indian Railways are subsidized by around ₹260 billion (US$5 billion in 2023), of which around 60% goes to commuter rail and short-haul trips.[129]
Europe
[edit]
According to the 2017 European Railway Performance Index for intensity of use, quality of service and safety performance, the top tier European national rail systems consists of Switzerland, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Austria, Sweden, and France.[131] Performance levels reveal a positive correlation between public cost and a given railway system's performance, and also reveal differences in the value that countries receive in return for their public cost. Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland capture relatively high value for their money, while Luxembourg, Belgium, Latvia, Slovakia, Portugal, Romania, and Bulgaria underperform relative to the average ratio of performance to cost among European countries.[131]
| Country | Subsidy in billions of Euros | Year |
|---|---|---|
| 17.0 | 2014[132] | |
| 13.2 | 2013[133] | |
| 8.1 | 2009[134] | |
| 5.8 | 2012[135] | |
| 5.1 | 2015[136] | |
| 4.5 | 2015[137] | |
| 3.4 | 2008[130] | |
| 2.5 | 2014[138] | |
| 2.3 | 2009[130] | |
| 1.7 | 2008[130] | |
| 1.6 | 2009[139] | |
| 1.4 | 2008[140] | |
| 0.91 | 2008[140] |
Russia
[edit]In 2016, Russian Railways received 94.9 billion roubles (around US$1.4 billion) from the government.[141]
United States
[edit]In 2015, funding from the US federal government for Amtrak was around US$1.4 billion.[142] By 2018, appropriated funding had increased to approximately US$1.9 billion.[143]
See also
[edit]- Battery electric multiple unit – Zero-emissions unwired train
- Electric multiple unit – Electric train with no locomotive
- Electric–steam locomotive – Steam locomotive with boiler heated electrically
- Environmental design in rail transportation
- Ground-effect train – Type of train
- History of tram and light rail transit systems by country
- History of transport
- Hydrogen train – Train transporting or using hydrogen
- International Union of Railways – International rail transport industry body
- List of countries by rail transport network size
- List of countries by rail usage
- List of railroad-related periodicals
- List of railway companies
- List of railway industry occupations
- Mega project – Extremely large-scale construction and investment project
- Mine railway – Type of railway that operates in a mine
- Outline of rail transport – Overview of and topical guide to rail transport
- Passenger rail terminology – Terms used for passenger railway lines and equipment
- Rail transport by country
- Railway systems engineering – Study of engineering principles necessary for railway construction and operation
- Steam turbine locomotive – Locomotive using a steam turbine
- Vactrain – Train inside a vacuum tube
Notes
[edit]- ^ According to [Norman Bradbury (November 2002). Face the facts on transport safety (PDF). Railwatch (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 October 2010.], railways are the safest on both a per-mile and per-hour basis, whereas air transport is safe only on a per-mile basis.
- ^ Heilmann evaluated both AC and DC electric transmission for his locomotives, but eventually settled on a design based on Thomas Edison's DC system.[50]
References
[edit]- ^ "History, Invention, & Facts". Britannica. Archived from the original on 1 October 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
- ^ a b IEA (2019). The Future of Rail. Paris: International Energy Agency. Archived from the original on 17 November 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
- ^ Schwantes, Carlos A. and Ronda, James P. The West the Railroads Made, pp. 4-5, 9, 11, 28-9, 91, 105, 127, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, 2008. ISBN 978-0-295-98769-9
- ^ Hilton, George W. American Narrow Gauge Railroads, p. 41, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1990.
- ^ Floyd, Donald R. California Narrow Gauge: The Role of Narrow-Gauge Railroads in California's Transportation Network, pp. 19-20, 22, The Gibson Press, Mountain View, California, 1970.
- ^ Athearn, Robert G. Rebel of the Rockies: A History of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad, pp. 4-5, 16-25, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1962.
- ^ Beebe, Lucius and Clegg, Charles. Narrow Gauge in the Rockies, p. 31, Howell-North, Berkeley, California, 1958.
- ^ Jensen, Oliver. The American Heritage History of Railroads in America, pp. 7, 32, 84, 104, American Heritage Publishing Company, New York, New York, 1975.
- ^ "Building the Transcontinental Railroad". Digital History. University of Houston. 2021.
- ^ Schwantes, Carlos A. and Ronda, James P. The West the Railroads Made, pp. 4-5, 9, 11, 28-9, 91, 105, 127, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, 2008. ISBN 978-0-295-98769-9
- ^ Athearn, Robert G. Rebel of the Rockies: A History of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad, pp. 4-5, 16-25, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1962.
- ^ Beebe, Lucius and Clegg, Charles. Narrow Gauge in the Rockies, p. 31, Howell-North, Berkeley, California, 1958.
- ^ Davidson, James West, et al. American Nation: Independence Through 1914, p. 304, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2000. ISBN 0-13-434888-5.
- ^ Blum, John M. et al. The National Experience: A History of the United States, pp. 298-9, Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York, New York, 1963.
- ^ Lewis, M. J. T. (2001). "Railways in the Greek and Roman world" (PDF). In Guy, A.; Rees, J. (eds.). Early Railways. A Selection of Papers from the First International Early Railways Conference. pp. 8–19. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011.
- ^ Fraser, P. M. (December 1961). "The ΔΙΟΛΚΟΣ of Alexandria". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 47: 134–138. doi:10.2307/3855873. JSTOR 3855873.
- ^ "Der Reiszug: Part 1 – Presentation". Funimag. Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2009.
- ^ Kriechbaum, Reinhard (15 May 2004). "Die große Reise auf den Berg". der Tagespost (in German). Archived from the original on 28 June 2012. Retrieved 22 April 2009.
- ^ Georgius Agricola (trans Hoover), De re metallica (1913), p. 156.
- ^ Lee, Charles E. (1943). "The Evolution of Railways". Railway Gazette (2nd ed.). London. p. 16. OCLC 1591369.
- ^ Lewis, Early wooden railways, pp. 8–10.
- ^ Warren Allison, Samuel Murphy and Richard Smith, An Early Railway in the German Mines of Caldbeck in G. Boyes (ed.), Early Railways 4: Papers from the 4th International Early Railways Conference 2008 (Six Martlets, Sudbury, 2010), pp. 52–69.
- ^ Jones, Mark (2012). Lancashire Railways – The History of Steam. Newbury: Countryside Books. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-84674-298-9.
- ^ Peter King, The First Shropshire Railways in G. Boyes (ed.), Early Railways 4: Papers from the 4th International Early Railways Conference 2008 (Six Martlets, Sudbury, 2010), pp. 70–84.
- ^ "Huntingdon Beaumont's Wollaton to Strelley Waggonway". Nottingham Hidden History. 30 July 2013. Archived from the original on 27 November 2022. Retrieved 23 August 2017.
- ^ Porter, Peter (1914). Landmarks of the Niagara Frontier. Privately printed. OCLC 1044424468.
- ^ Vaughan, A. (1997). Railwaymen, Politics and Money. London: John Murray. ISBN 978-0-7195-5746-0.
- ^ "Surrey Iron Railway 200th – 26th July 2003". Early Railways. Stephenson Locomotive Society. Archived from the original on 12 May 2009.
- ^ Landes, David. S. (1969). The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge, New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-521-09418-4.
- ^ Landes 1969, pp. 92
- ^ Wells, David A. (1890). Recent Economic Changes and Their Effect on Production and Distribution of Wealth and Well-Being of Society. New York: D. Appleton and Co. OCLC 2607599.
- ^ Grübler, Arnulf (1990). The Rise and Fall of Infrastructures: Dynamics of Evolution and Technological Change in Transport (PDF). Heidelberg and New York: Physica-Verlag. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2012. Retrieved 11 October 2017.
- ^ Fogel, Robert W. (1964). Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins Press. OCLC 237790.
- ^ Rosenberg, Nathan (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-521-27367-1.
- ^ "Early Days of Mumbles Railway". BBC. 15 February 2007. Archived from the original on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 19 September 2007.
- ^ Gordon, W. J. (1910). Our Home Railways, volume one. London: Frederick Warne and Co. pp. 7–9.
- ^ "Richard Trevithick's steam locomotive". National Museum Wales. Archived from the original on 15 April 2011.
- ^ "Steam train anniversary begins". BBC. 21 February 2004. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2009.
A south Wales town has begun months of celebrations to mark the 200th anniversary of the invention of the steam locomotive. Merthyr Tydfil was the location where, on 21 February 1804, Richard Trevithick took the world into the railway age when he set one of his high-pressure steam engines on a local iron master's tram rails
- ^ Hamilton Ellis (1968). The Pictorial Encyclopedia of Railways. The Hamlyn Publishing Group. p. 12.
- ^ "'Puffing Billy' locomotive | Science Museum Group Collection". collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk. Archived from the original on 19 May 2023. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
- ^ Hamilton Ellis (1968). The Pictorial Encyclopedia of Railways. The Hamlyn Publishing Group. pp. 20–22.
- ^ Ellis, Hamilton (1968). The Pictorial Encyclopedia of Railways. Hamlyn Publishing Group.
- ^ "First in the world: The making of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway". Science and Industry Museum. Archived from the original on 2 May 2020. Retrieved 15 April 2022.
- ^ Day, Lance; McNeil, Ian (1966). "Davidson, Robert". Biographical dictionary of the history of technology. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-06042-4.
- ^ Gordon, William (1910). "The Underground Electric". Our Home Railways. Vol. 2. London: Frederick Warne and Co. p. 156.
- ^ Renzo Pocaterra, Treni, De Agostini, 2003
- ^ Jean Denis G.G Lepage, Military Trains and Railways: an illustrated history, Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2017. Print. pp. 9-11.
- ^ "Richmond Union Passenger Railway". IEEE History Center. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2008.
- ^ "A brief history of the Underground". Transport for London.gov.uk. 15 October 2017. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
- ^ Duffy (2003), pp. 39–41.
- ^ Duffy (2003), p. 129.
- ^ Andrew L. Simon (1998). Made in Hungary: Hungarian Contributions to Universal Culture. Simon Publications. p. 264. ISBN 978-0-9665734-2-8.
Evian-les-Bains kando.
- ^ Francis S. Wagner (1977). Hungarian Contributions to World Civilization. Alpha Publications. p. 67. ISBN 978-0-912404-04-2.
- ^ Duffy (2003), p. 120–121.
- ^ a b Hungarian Patent Office. "Kálmán Kandó (1869–1931)". mszh.hu. Archived from the original on 8 October 2010. Retrieved 10 August 2008.
- ^ Duffy (2003), p. 137.
- ^ Duffy (2003), p. 273.
- ^ "Motive power for British Railways" (PDF), The Engineer, vol. 202, p. 254, 24 April 1956, archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2014, retrieved 11 October 2017
- ^ Thomson, William (4 May 1888), "Priestmans' Petroleum Engine", The Electrical Review, 22: 474, hdl:2027/mdp.39015084630964 – via Haithi Trust,
A small double cylinder engine has been mounted upon a truck, which is worked on a temporary line of rails, in order to show the adaptation of a petroleum engine for locomotive purposes, on tramways
- ^ Diesel Railway Traction, vol. 17, 1963, p. 25,
In one sense a dock authority was the earliest user of an oil-engined locomotive, for it was at the Hull docks of the North Eastern Railway that the Priestman locomotive put in its short period of service in 1894
- ^ Churella, Albert J. (1998). From Steam to Diesel: Managerial Customs and Organizational Capabilities in the Twentieth-Century American Locomotive Industry. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-0-691-02776-0.
- ^ Glatte, Wolfgang (1993). Deutsches Lok-Archiv: Diesellokomotiven 4. Auflage. Berlin: Transpress. ISBN 978-3-344-70767-5.
- ^ Westwood, J. N. (1982). Soviet Locomotive Technology During Industrialization, 1928—1952. Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-05013-0.
- ^ US 1154785, Lemp, Hermann, "Controlling mechanism for internal-combustion engines", issued 28 September 1915
- ^ Pinkepank, Jerry A. (1973). The Second Diesel Spotter's Guide. Milwaukee WI: Kalmbach Books. p. 409. ISBN 978-0-89024-026-7.
- ^ STANDS4 LLC, 2020, TPH Archived 19 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine, abbreviations.com, accessed 19 July 2020
- ^ a b c d e f American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association Committee 24 – Education and Training. (2003). Practical Guide to Railway Engineering. AREMA, 2nd Ed.
- ^ "Rail freight in the next decade: Potential for performance improvements?". Global Railway Review. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
- ^ "Environmental Issues". The Environmental Blog. 3 April 2007. Archived from the original on 11 January 2012. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
- ^ Marcomin, Fabio (11 October 2024). "Effetto M4: la metro di Milano entra nella top europea". Milano Città Stato (in Italian). Retrieved 12 October 2024.
- ^ "Mass transit - Urban Mobility, Efficiency, Environment". Britannica. 4 September 2024. Retrieved 29 September 2024.
- ^ "Fact Book Glossary". American Public Transportation Association. Retrieved 29 September 2024.
- ^ "Rapid transit". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 20 July 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
- ^ UITP (2011). "Recommended basic reference for developing a minimum set of standards for voluntary use in the field of urban rail, according to mandate M/486" (PDF). Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 16 February 2014.
- ^ "Glossary of Transit Terminology" (PDF). American Public Transportation Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
- ^ Fouracre, Phil; Dunkerley, Christian; Gardner, Geoff (2003). "Mass rapid transit systems for cities in the developing world". Transport Reviews. 23 (3). Taylor & Francis Online: 299–310. doi:10.1080/0144164032000083095. S2CID 154931412. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
- ^ "Rapid Transit". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 17 October 2014. Retrieved 28 November 2014.
- ^ "Chicago". Archived from the original on 16 April 2015. Retrieved 24 April 2015.
- ^ Transport for London (1981). London Underground: History. Capital Transport. ISBN 978-0-904711-30-1. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 2 January 2013.
- ^ "Luoyang and Ji'nan open metro lines". International Railway Journal. 29 March 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2021.
- ^ "China's Metro Boom Continues to Drive Rapid Transit Growth – Institute for Transportation and Development Policy". Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. 30 July 2018. Archived from the original on 20 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- ^ "Metro Data". metro-data.info. Archived from the original on 29 September 2018. Retrieved 28 September 2018.
- ^ "Rapid Transit Trends Show Record Growth in 2016, with Huge Increases in China, Brazil – Institute for Transportation and Development Policy". Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. 17 February 2017. Archived from the original on 23 October 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- ^ "Shanghai now the world's longest metro". Railway Gazette International. 4 May 2010. Archived from the original on 15 May 2010. Retrieved 4 May 2010.
- ^ Smith, Stephen J. (6 January 2014). "New Starts: Shanghai Metro World's Longest, Panama Canal Drama, Japan's Maglev". Next City. Archived from the original on 25 September 2014. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
- ^ "Facts – Subway and Bus Ridership". Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
- ^ Rodrigue, Jean-Paul (2020). The geography of transport systems (Fifth ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-34632-3. OCLC 1133662497.
- ^ "The Inception of the English Railway Station". Architectural History. 4: 63–76. 1961. doi:10.2307/1568245. JSTOR 1568245. S2CID 246043093.
- ^ "About Us". Archived from the original on 9 October 2014.
- ^ Guan, Xueyi; Qin, Jin; Mao, Chenghui; Zhou, Wenliang (January 2023). "A Literature Review of Railway Pricing Based on Revenue Management". Mathematics. 11 (4): 857. doi:10.3390/math11040857. ISSN 2227-7390.
- ^ "Shipping Tariffs". Old Dominion Freight Line. Retrieved 7 April 2024.
- ^ "EU Technical Report 2007". Archived from the original on 23 January 2018. Retrieved 26 January 2016.
- ^ a b EuDaly, Kevin; et al. (2009). The Complete Book of North American Railroading. Minneapolis: Voyageur Press. ISBN 978-0-7603-2848-4. OCLC 209631579.
- ^ "Statistics database for transports". epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (statistical database). Eurostat, European Commission. 20 April 2014. Archived from the original on 3 June 2012. Retrieved 12 May 2014.
- ^ Vojtech Eksler, ed. (5 May 2013). "Intermediate report on the development of railway safety in the European Union 2013" (PDF). www.era.europa.eu (report). Safety Unit, European Railway Agency & European Union. p. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 August 2017. Retrieved 12 May 2014.
- ^ American Association of Railroads. "Railroad Fuel Efficiency Sets New Record". Archived from the original on 26 November 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
- ^ a b "What is Rail Transport? Definition of Rail Transport, Rail Transport Meaning". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
- ^ Publicada por João Pimentel Ferreira. "Carro ou comboio?". Veraveritas.eu. Archived from the original on 8 April 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
- ^ "Public Transportation Ridership Statistics". American Public Transportation Association. 2007. Archived from the original on 15 August 2007. Retrieved 10 September 2007.
- ^ Baum-Snow, Nathaniel; Kahn, Matthew E. (August 2000). "The effects of new public projects to expand urban rail transit". Journal of Public Economics. 77 (2): 241–263. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00085-7. Archived from the original on 14 March 2022. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
- ^ "New height of world's railway born in Tibet". Xinhua News Agency. 24 August 2005. Archived from the original on 13 September 2005. Retrieved 8 May 2011.
- ^ Schivelbusch, G. (1986) The Railway Journey: Industrialization and Perception of Time and Space in the 19th Century. Oxford: Berg.
- ^ Tony Judt, When the Facts Change: Essays 1995–2010 (2015) pp. 287–288.
- ^ Cermeño, Alexandra L.; Enflo, Kerstin; Lindvall, Johannes (2021). "Railroads and Reform: How Trains Strengthened the Nation State". British Journal of Political Science. 52 (2): 715–735. doi:10.1017/S0007123420000654. ISSN 0007-1234.
- ^ Adams, Henry (1918). "The Press (1868)". The Education of Henry Adams. p. 240. Archived from the original on 18 March 2017. Retrieved 11 May 2017.
- ^ Jenks, Leland H. (1944). "Railroads as an Economic Force in American Development". The Journal of Economic History. 4 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1017/S002205070008400X. JSTOR 2113700. S2CID 154883188.
- ^ Edward C. Kirkland, Industry comes of age: Business, labor, and public policy, 1860–1897 (1961) pp. 52, 68–74.
- ^ Chandler, Alfred D. (1954). "Patterns of American Railroad Finance, 1830–50". The Business History Review. 28 (3): 248–263. doi:10.2307/3111573. JSTOR 3111573. S2CID 154702721.
- ^ Kirkland, Industry comes of age (1961) pp. 57–68.
- ^ Jenks, Leland H. (1951). "Capital Movement and Transportation: Britain and American Railway Development". The Journal of Economic History. 11 (4): 375–388. doi:10.1017/S0022050700085119. JSTOR 2113694. S2CID 153714837.
- ^ Saul Engelbourg, The man who found the money: John Stewart Kennedy and the financing of the western railroads (1996).
- ^ Alfred D. Chandler and Stephen Salsbury. "The railroads: Innovators in modern business administration." in Bruce Mazlish, ed., The Railroad and the Space Program (MIT Press, 1965) pp. 127–162
- ^ Licht, Walter (1983). Working for the Railroad: The Organization of Work in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press. pp. 262–263, 289. ISBN 9780691047003.
- ^ Hong Kong Information Services Department of the Hong Kong SAR Government. Hong Kong 2009
- ^ Hu, Hua; Gao, Yun-Feng; Liu, Zhi-Gang; Yang, Xiao-Guang (2010). "Effect of integrated multi-modal transit information on modal shift". 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. pp. 1753–1757. doi:10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625187. ISBN 978-1-4244-7657-2. S2CID 38806085.
- ^ Straszak, A. (1977). The Shinkansen High-Speed Rail Network of Japan: Proceedings of an IIASA Conference, June 27–30, 1977. Elsevier. ISBN 978-1-4831-8916-1.[page needed]
- ^ Christopher R. Gabel, "Railroad Generalship: Foundations of Civil War Strategy" (Army Command And General Staff College, Combat Studies Inst, 1997) online Archived 7 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Dennis E. Showalter, Railroads and Rifles: soldiers, technology, and the unification of Germany (1975).
- ^ Stevenson, D. (1 February 1999). "War by Timetable? The Railway Race Before 1914". Past & Present (162): 163–194. doi:10.1093/past/162.1.163.
- ^ Denis Bishop and W. J. K. Davies, Railways and War Before 1918 (London: Blandford Press, 1972); Bishop and Davies, Railways and War Since 1917 (1974).
- ^ Lytton, Henry D (1 April 1983). "Bombing Policy in the Rome and Pre-Normandy Invasion Aerial Campaigns of World War II: Bridge-Bombing Strategy Vindicated – and Railyard-Bombing Strategy Invalidated". Military Affairs. 47 (2). Lexington: 53–58. doi:10.2307/1988491. JSTOR 1988491. ProQuest 1296644342.
- ^ Lewandowski, Krzysztof (December 2015). "New coefficients of rail transport usage" (PDF). International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology. 5 (6): 89–91. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
- ^ Squires, G. Ed. (2002) Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, & Policy Responses. The Urban Institute Press.
- ^ Puentes, R. (2008). A Bridge to Somewhere: Rethinking American Transportation for the 21st Century. Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Report: Blueprint for American Prosperity series report.
- ^ Bryant, Chad (April 2009). "Into an Uncertain Future: Railroads and Vormärz Liberalism in Brno, Vienna, and Prague". Austrian History Yearbook. 40: 183–201. doi:10.1017/S0067237809000150.
- ^ Guo, Shihong; Chen, Liqiang (March 2019). "Can urban rail transit systems alleviate air pollution? Empirical evidence from Beijing: XXXX". Growth and Change. 50 (1): 130–144. doi:10.1111/grow.12266.
- ^ Firzli, M. Nicolas J. (1 July 2013). "Transportation Infrastructure and Country Attractiveness". Revue Analyse Financière. Paris. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 26 April 2014.
- ^ "China plans to spend $115 billion on railways in 2017: Xinhua". Reuters. 4 January 2017. Archived from the original on 23 March 2023. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
- ^ "Govt defends fare hike, says rail subsidy burden was too heavy". The Times of India. 22 June 2014. Archived from the original on 9 July 2023. Retrieved 30 June 2016.
- ^ a b c d "ANNEX to Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 concerning the opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail" (PDF) (Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment). Brussels: European Commission. 2013. pp. 6, 44, 45. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 May 2013.
2008 data is not provided for Italy, so 2007 data is used instead
- ^ a b "the 2017 European Railway Performance Index". Boston Consulting Group. 18 April 2017. Archived from the original on 31 May 2020. Retrieved 8 January 2021.
- ^ "German Railway Financing" (PDF). p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 March 2016.
- ^ "Efficiency indicators of Railways in France" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 November 2015.
- ^ "The age of the train" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 27 January 2016.
- ^ "Facts and arguments in favour of Swiss public transport". p. 24. Archived from the original on 26 October 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2016.
6.3 billion Swiss francs
- ^ "Spanish railways battle profit loss with more investment". 17 September 2015. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
- ^ "GB rail industry financial information 2014–15" (PDF). 9 March 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 March 2016. Retrieved 9 March 2016.
£3.5 billion
- ^ "ProRail report 2015" (PDF). p. 30. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
- ^ "The evolution of public funding to the rail sector in 5 European countries – a comparison" (PDF). p. 6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 27 January 2016.
- ^ a b "European rail study report" (PDF). pp. 44, 45. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 May 2013.
Includes both "Railway subsidies" and "Public Service Obligations".
- ^ "Government support for Russian Railways". Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
- ^ "FY15 Budget, Business Plan 2015" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 February 2016. Retrieved 9 March 2016.
- ^ "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Consolidated Financial Statements With Report of Independent Auditors" (PDF). Amtrak. 28 January 2019. p. 33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 November 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2019.
Sources
[edit]- Duffy, Michael C. (2003). Electric Railways 1880–1990. IET. ISBN 978-0-85296-805-5.
Further reading
[edit]- Burton, Anthony. Railway Empire: How the British Gave Railways to the World (2018) excerpt
- Chant, Christopher. The world's railways: the history and development of rail transport (Chartwell Books, 2001).
- Faith, Nicholas. The World the Railways Made (2014) excerpt
- Freeman, Michael. "The Railway as Cultural Metaphor: 'What Kind of Railway History?' Revisited." Journal of Transport History 20.2 (1999): 160–167.
- Mukhopadhyay, Aparajita. Imperial Technology and 'Native'Agency: A Social History of Railways in Colonial India, 1850–1920 (Taylor & Francis, 2018).
- Nock, O. S. Railways then and now: a world history (1975) online
- Nock, O. S. World atlas of railways (1978) online
- Nock, O. S. 150 years of main line railways (1980) online
- Pirie, Gordon. "Tracking railway histories." Journal of Transport History 35.2 (2014): 242–248.
- Sawai, Minoru, ed. The Development of Railway Technology in East Asia in Comparative Perspective (#Sringer, 2017)
- Trains Magazine. The Historical Guide to North American Railroads (3rd ed. 2014)
- Wolmar, Christian. Blood, iron, and gold: How the railroads transformed the world (Public Affairs, 2011).
External links
[edit]Rail transport
View on GrokipediaOverview
Definition and Principles
Rail transport is the conveyance of passengers and goods using vehicles that travel along fixed guideways, most commonly paired steel rails forming tracks of standardized gauge width, such as 1,435 mm (4 ft 8.5 in) for standard gauge systems prevalent in Europe, North America, and much of Asia.[1] These tracks typically comprise rails fastened to cross ties (sleepers) made of wood, concrete, or steel, which are embedded in ballast—a layer of crushed stone providing drainage, stability, and load distribution to the underlying subgrade.[8] The vehicles, known as rolling stock, include locomotives for motive power and cars or coaches for carrying loads, connected in consists that can extend thousands of meters for freight or hundreds for passengers.[1] The core operating principle relies on guided motion, where flanged steel wheels on axles roll along the rails, with the inner flange preventing lateral derailment and ensuring precise path-following even at high speeds or under load shifts.[1] Propulsion in adhesion-based systems—the dominant form—depends on frictional contact (adhesion) between driving wheels and rails to convert rotational engine power into forward thrust, with typical adhesion coefficients ranging from 0.15 to 0.25 under dry conditions, limited by factors like railhead contamination or weather.[9] For steep gradients exceeding adhesion limits (typically 2-4%), supplementary systems like rack-and-pinion or cable haulage may be employed.[1] Curves incorporate superelevation (cant) to balance centrifugal force, while track geometry maintains tolerances for stability, with minimum curve radii often around 100-400 meters for mainlines to avoid excessive wear or speed restrictions.[1] A key engineering advantage stems from the steel-on-steel interface, yielding a rolling resistance coefficient of approximately 0.001-0.002—far lower than rubber tires on roads (0.01-0.02)—which minimizes energy loss and enables single trains to haul loads equivalent to 400-600 trucks, achieving 1.9-5.5 times the energy efficiency of trucking for bulk freight over long distances.[10][1] This efficiency arises from reduced deformation hysteresis and bearing friction in the wheel-rail contact patch, though total resistance also includes aerodynamic drag (dominant at speeds over 100 km/h), journal bearing losses, and track curvature effects.[10] Capacity scalability supports high throughput, with double-stacked container trains carrying up to 600 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEU), underscoring rail's role in land-based mass transit where infrastructure investment permits.[1]Types and Classifications
Rail transport systems are classified by track gauge, propulsion method, service purpose, and operational characteristics such as capacity and separation from other traffic. These classifications reflect engineering choices driven by terrain, traffic volume, cost, and historical development, with standard configurations enabling interoperability while specialized variants optimizing for specific conditions.[11] Track gauge refers to the lateral distance between the inner faces of the parallel rails, typically measured in millimeters. The predominant standard gauge measures 1,435 mm (4 ft 8.5 in), utilized on roughly 60% of global railway networks due to its adoption in early British engineering and subsequent international standardization. Broad gauges exceed 1,435 mm, such as 1,520 mm in Ireland and 1,676 mm in India and Pakistan, often retained for legacy systems offering greater stability at higher speeds or on curved tracks. Narrow gauges under 1,435 mm, including 1,000 mm meter gauge and 762 mm Cape gauge, prevail in mountainous or low-density regions for reduced construction costs and tighter curves, comprising significant portions in countries like Australia and parts of Africa.[12][13] Propulsion systems categorize railways as non-electrified or electrified. Non-electrified lines rely on onboard fuel, primarily diesel-electric locomotives where a diesel engine powers electric traction motors, suitable for remote or low-traffic routes with flexibility but higher emissions. Electrified systems draw power from overhead wires via pantographs or third rails, enabling higher efficiency and acceleration, especially for frequent urban or high-speed services; diesel-electric remains dominant globally, while electrification covers about one-third of tracks in Europe but less elsewhere. Emerging hybrids combine diesel with batteries or hydrogen fuel cells for reduced emissions on non-electrified segments.[14][15] By service purpose, railways divide into freight, passenger, and mixed operations. Freight trains haul bulk commodities like coal, containers, or chemicals over long distances, prioritized in networks like North America's where Class I carriers—defined by annual revenue exceeding $943.6 million in 2023—operate vast mainlines with heavy axle loads up to 36 tonnes. Passenger services include intercity expresses, regional commuter lines sharing freight tracks, and dedicated high-speed rails exceeding 250 km/h on grade-separated alignments. Mixed trains, combining passengers and freight, persist in low-density areas but have declined with specialization for safety and efficiency.[16][17] Operational classifications distinguish mainline from urban rail transit. Mainline heavy rail supports high-capacity, long-haul travel with robust infrastructure for speeds up to 200 km/h conventionally. Urban systems include heavy rail metros—fully grade-separated underground or elevated networks with capacities over 40,000 passengers per hour per direction, as in New York or London—and light rail, featuring lighter vehicles that may share streets with lower speeds (up to 80 km/h) and capacities around 10,000-20,000 pphpd, common in cities like Portland or Manchester. Trams operate predominantly at street level for short urban trips, while commuter rail bridges suburban and city-center connectivity on shared mainlines.[18][19]Historical Development
Early Innovations and Pre-Steam Systems
Early rail transport emerged in European mining operations during the mid-16th century, primarily as wooden wagonways designed to facilitate the movement of ore and coal with reduced friction compared to dirt paths. In Germany, these systems appeared around 1550, consisting of parallel wooden rails upon which wagons were pulled by horses or human labor, marking the initial application of guided track technology for bulk haulage.[2] [20] The technology spread to England in the 1560s through German miners employed in Cumbrian lead mines, where a wagonway was constructed at Caldbeck using similar wooden rails for efficient cart transport. The first documented wagonway in England, the Wollaton Wagonway built between 1603 and 1604 near Nottingham, extended approximately 2.5 miles to convey coal from mines to the River Trent, employing horse-drawn wagons on grooved wooden rails that incorporated early flange-like mechanisms to maintain wheel alignment.[21] [22] Key innovations in the late 18th century addressed durability and efficiency limitations of wooden rails. In 1789, English engineer William Jessop introduced wagons with flanged wheels that gripped the top edge of plain rails, shifting from rail-flanged plateways to edge-rail systems and enabling smoother operation with less derailment risk.[20] Cast iron rails, initially L-shaped for plateways, began replacing wood in the 1790s, with lengths of about 4 feet, providing greater strength for heavier loads in industrial settings like the Little Eaton Tramway of 1795, a 5-mile horse-drawn plateway connecting coal pits to the Derby Canal.[23] Pre-steam motive power relied on animal traction, human effort, or gravity-assisted inclines. Gravity railways, such as the 1515 Reisszug funicular in the Erzgebirge mountains of Germany, used counterweighted wagons on inclined rails for ascending and descending mine shafts, predating widespread wagonways but exemplifying early mechanized rail principles without engines.[24] These systems, confined largely to mining and quarrying, laid foundational engineering concepts—including standardized gauges and load-bearing tracks—that influenced subsequent steam-era developments, though their capacity remained limited by traction methods.[25]Steam-Powered Expansion
The Stockton and Darlington Railway commenced operations on 27 September 1825, establishing the first public railway employing steam locomotives for scheduled freight haulage, primarily coal from collieries to coastal ports.[26] George Stephenson's Locomotion No. 1, constructed at a cost of £600, drew 38 wagons totaling 90 tons over the 26-mile (42 km) route, attaining speeds of up to 15 mph empty and averaging 8 mph when loaded.[27] [28] This inaugural run, which included passengers in open coal wagons, validated steam power's superiority over equine traction for bulk goods, catalyzing investor confidence in rail infrastructure.[29] Building on this foundation, the Liverpool and Manchester Railway (L&MR) conducted the Rainhill Trials in October 1829 to determine optimal motive power for inter-city service.[30] Stephenson's Rocket, engineered with his son Robert, triumphed by completing multiple round trips at an average of 12 mph and peaking at 30 mph, incorporating innovations like a multi-tube boiler and blastpipe exhaust for enhanced efficiency.[31] The L&MR opened on 15 September 1830 as the pioneering steam-exclusive inter-urban railway, transporting passengers and merchandise via timetabled trains with novel signaling protocols, achieving profitability within months and underscoring steam's adaptability for high-volume passenger traffic.[32] [33] These milestones ignited expansive railway construction in Britain, fueled by industrial coal demands, manufacturing growth, and capital mobilization during the 1830s "railway mania." Track mileage surged from negligible lengths in 1830 to 1,497 miles (2,410 km) by 1840 and 6,621 miles (10,650 km) by 1850, interconnecting industrial heartlands and ports.[34] By 1870, the network spanned 15,370 miles (24,740 km), accommodating 423 million passengers yearly and £3 billion in cumulative investment through 1900, profoundly accelerating freight velocities—coal transport costs plummeted—and fostering urban agglomeration around junctions.[34] [35] Steam technology disseminated globally post-1830, with British engineers exporting designs and expertise. In the United States, Peter Cooper's Tom Thumb demonstrated viability on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad in August 1830, though a race loss to a horse highlighted early reliability challenges; commercial steam operations proliferated, reaching 9,000 miles by 1850.[36] [37] Continental Europe followed: Belgium's 1835 line from Brussels to Mechelen preceded France's Saint-Étienne to Andrézieux in 1832, while Germany's networks burgeoned after 1835 state initiatives.[38] By century's end, steam railways underpinned imperial logistics in India (first line 1853) and Australia, amassing over 400,000 miles worldwide and integral to resource extraction, troop mobility, and trade amplification.[38]Transition to Electric and Diesel Power
The transition from steam power in rail transport began with electric traction in the late 19th century, driven by the need for cleaner, more controllable motive power in confined spaces like urban areas and mines. In 1879, Werner von Siemens demonstrated the first electric locomotive on a short track in Berlin, powered by a dynamo and drawing current from the rails. This was followed in 1881 by the opening of the Gross-Lichterfelde Tramway near Berlin, the world's first electric railway for public passenger service, operating over 2.8 kilometers with a top speed of 15 km/h using overhead wires. Electric systems offered advantages over steam, including rapid acceleration, reduced emissions in enclosed environments, and lower maintenance due to fewer moving parts in the locomotive itself, though they required extensive fixed infrastructure like overhead catenary or third rails.[39] Diesel propulsion emerged concurrently but gained traction later, building on Rudolf Diesel's 1897 patent for the compression-ignition engine, which achieved higher thermal efficiency than steam's 5-7% by reaching 30-40%. Early diesel rail applications appeared in the 1910s, with the first full diesel locomotive built by Kitson and Company in 1912 for the Crown Agents, but practical adoption accelerated in the 1920s through diesel-electric configurations, where a diesel engine drove a generator to power traction motors. General Electric introduced such switcher locomotives in the U.S. around 1924, proving capable of hauling heavy loads without the water and coal logistics of steam. Diesel's appeal lay in its self-contained fuel system, eliminating the need for electrification infrastructure, enabling flexibility on sparsely populated networks, and reducing labor through simpler operation—no constant fire-tending required.[40][41] Post-World War II, diesel locomotives dominated the transition in North America, with U.S. railroads fully dieselizing by the late 1950s, as steam's high fuel and maintenance costs—often requiring teams of 10-15 per locomotive—proved unsustainable amid rising labor expenses and operational demands. In Europe, electrification expanded rapidly on high-density corridors, leveraging abundant hydroelectric power; for instance, Switzerland achieved nearly full electrification by the 1950s, while countries like France and Italy electrified over 50% of their networks by 1970 for energy efficiency and to utilize nuclear-generated electricity. Globally, diesel suited freight-heavy, low-density lines for its quick startup and reliability, whereas electric traction prevailed in passenger-focused, urban systems, offering up to twice the energy efficiency of diesel due to regenerative braking and grid-supplied power. By the 1960s, these shifts had largely supplanted steam worldwide, with hybrid electro-diesel locomotives later bridging electrified and non-electrified sections.[42][43]Modern Era: High-Speed and Globalization
The modern era of rail transport, beginning in the mid-20th century, is characterized by the advent of high-speed rail (HSR) systems capable of sustained speeds exceeding 200 km/h on dedicated tracks, alongside the globalization of rail networks through extensive international expansion and technological standardization. Japan's Tokaido Shinkansen, launched on October 1, 1964, between Tokyo and Osaka, marked the world's first commercial HSR service, operating at a maximum speed of 210 km/h and reducing travel time from over six hours to about four hours.[44] [45] This innovation addressed post-World War II reconstruction needs by enhancing connectivity in densely populated corridors, prioritizing safety with dedicated rights-of-way free from level crossings.[46] Europe followed with dedicated HSR lines in the 1970s and 1980s, driven by energy efficiency and capacity demands amid rising air travel competition. France's TGV (Train à Grande Vitesse) inaugurated its Paris-Lyon line on September 27, 1981, achieving commercial speeds of 260 km/h and later setting a world record of 574.8 km/h for conventional wheeled trains in 2007.[47] Germany's InterCityExpress (ICE) debuted in 1991, while Spain and Italy expanded networks in the 1990s, with Europe's HSR totaling over 9,000 km by 2017 and growing through EU initiatives for cross-border interoperability.[48] [49] These systems emphasized electrification and advanced signaling, enabling average speeds of 250-300 km/h and integrating with conventional networks for broader reach.[46] Asia's HSR globalization accelerated in the 21st century, with China constructing the world's largest network, reaching 48,000 km by the end of 2024—accounting for over 70% of global HSR mileage—and connecting 97% of cities with populations exceeding 500,000.[50] [51] This rapid buildup, from under 1,000 km in 2008 to current scale, relied on imported technologies from Japan, France, and Germany, adapted for high-volume manufacturing and state-directed investment, though challenges include debt burdens on state-owned operators.[52] Globally, HSR networks expanded to approximately 65,000 km by 2024, with annual growth projected at 4.6% through 2035, concentrated in Asia but extending to emerging lines in India, Turkey, and Morocco via technology transfers and Belt and Road collaborations.[53] [54] HSR's globalization fosters economic integration by shortening inter-city distances, with empirical studies showing ridership surges and modal shifts from aviation in viable corridors, though adoption lags in low-density regions like the United States due to geographic and regulatory hurdles.[55] Standardization efforts, such as the International Union of Railways' definitions (HSR as lines enabling 250 km/h+ for new builds or 200 km/h+ for upgraded), facilitate cross-border operations, as seen in Europe's TEN-T network plans aiming for 30,000 km by 2030.[56] Safety records remain exemplary, with Japan's Shinkansen achieving zero passenger fatalities in over 50 years of operation at billions of passenger-kilometers.[57]Preservation Efforts
Railway preservation efforts gained momentum in the mid-1950s as steam locomotives faced widespread retirement, prompting enthusiasts to organize for the salvage and restoration of historical equipment.[58] These initiatives focused on maintaining operational heritage lines and static displays to document rail technology's evolution.[59] By 1960, the near-total cessation of steam operations in many countries marked a pivotal shift, accelerating organized preservation amid the transition to diesel and electric motive power.[59] In the United States, the Railway & Locomotive Historical Society, established in 1921, laid early groundwork through research and excursions, with the first organized "fan trip" occurring in 1934.[60] Heritage operations like the Strasburg Rail Road exemplify ongoing efforts to recreate historical rail scenes via restored steam-era rolling stock and track infrastructure.[58] Museums such as the Museum of the American Railroad originated from 1963 exhibits showcasing steam-age artifacts, emphasizing rail's role in industrial development.[61] Globally, preservation societies prioritize artifact conservation, including locomotives, signals, and track components, often adapting disused lines for tourist operations that sustain maintenance.[62] The Association of Railway Museums developed standardized practices in 1997 to guide ethical collection management and public education on rail history.[63] These efforts preserve tangible evidence of innovations like early steam engines and electrified systems, countering obsolescence driven by modernization. Challenges include material degradation from humidity, pollution, and pests, compounded by funding shortages and regulatory hurdles for operational heritage sites.[64] Economic sustainability requires balancing tourism revenue with restoration costs, while technical uncertainties in aging components demand reliability-focused frameworks for long-term viability.[65] Despite these, preservation initiatives foster public appreciation of rail's historical contributions to transportation efficiency and economic growth.[66]Technological Components
Rolling Stock and Motive Power
Rolling stock in rail transport consists of locomotives and railcars, which are the movable vehicles that run on tracks to transport passengers or freight. Locomotives serve as motive power units, providing the force to propel trains, while non-powered cars include passenger coaches, freight wagons such as hoppers and tank cars, and specialized vehicles like autoracks. These components are engineered with bogies—pivoting undercarriages supporting multiple axles—for stability at high speeds and curves, incorporating suspension systems to absorb track irregularities and ensure load distribution.[67] Motive power historically relied on steam locomotives, where coal or wood-fired boilers generated steam to drive pistons connected to drive wheels, achieving peak power output only at specific speeds due to thermodynamic limitations. Steam systems required frequent maintenance and produced significant emissions, leading to their replacement in most networks by mid-20th century equivalents. Diesel-electric locomotives dominate modern freight operations, featuring a diesel engine as the prime mover that powers an alternator or generator, converting mechanical energy into electricity to drive traction motors on the axles. This configuration allows variable power delivery across speeds without mechanical transmission losses, with traction motors providing high starting torque essential for heavy loads; a typical unit outputs 3,000-6,000 horsepower from engines like the EMD 16-710 series.[68][69][42] Electric motive power, used extensively in passenger and high-density corridors, draws current from overhead catenary wires via pantographs or third-rail systems, supplying it directly to asynchronous or DC traction motors for propulsion. These systems achieve higher efficiency—up to 90% energy conversion—compared to diesel's 30-40%, reducing operational costs and emissions when powered by renewable grids, though infrastructure dependency limits flexibility. Hybrid diesel-electric setups combine on-board generation with battery storage for short electrification gaps or emissions zones, as seen in European regional trains since 2010s trials.[70][68] Advancements in rolling stock design emphasize lightweight materials to enhance energy efficiency and payload capacity; traditional steel frames have shifted toward aluminum alloys for car bodies, reducing tare weight by 20-30% while maintaining crash resistance through energy-absorbing structures. Emerging composites, including carbon fiber-reinforced polymers, are applied in high-speed train shells and bogie components for tensile strength-to-weight ratios superior to metals, as demonstrated in Shinkansen series since the 1990s. Titanium alloys in bogies further cut mass by 15-20%, lowering center of gravity and wear on tracks, per engineering analyses from 2023 studies. These innovations, coupled with aerodynamic profiling and regenerative braking—recovering 20-30% of kinetic energy—enable speeds exceeding 300 km/h in dedicated networks, with safety standards mandating features like automatic train protection interfaces.[67][71][72][73]Track and Infrastructure
Railway track, also known as the permanent way, consists of rails, fastening systems, sleepers (or ties), and ballast or slab support, underpinned by a subgrade for stability and load distribution.[74] Rails are typically made of high-strength steel, rolled into profiles such as flat-bottom Vignole rails, which dominate modern networks for their efficient cross-section and compatibility with direct fastening to sleepers.[75] Bullhead rails, with symmetrical heads seated in chairs, were historically prevalent in the UK but have largely been phased out in favor of flat-bottom designs due to simpler installation and reduced material use.[76] The standard track gauge measures 1,435 mm (4 ft 8½ in), established by George Stephenson for the Liverpool and Manchester Railway opening in 1830, and adopted globally for interoperability on approximately 55% of the world's rail mileage as of 2023.[77] Variations include narrow gauges under 1,435 mm for cost savings in rugged terrain or mining, and broader gauges like 1,520 mm in Russia for stability at higher speeds, though these complicate cross-border operations.[78] Sleepers support the rails, spacing them at gauge distance and distributing loads to the ballast; common materials include treated hardwood for traditional flexibility, prestressed concrete for longevity exceeding 50 years in high-traffic lines, and steel for corrosion-resistant applications in harsh environments.[79] Concrete sleepers, introduced widely post-1950s, now comprise over 80% of installations in Europe due to lower life-cycle costs despite higher upfront expenses compared to wood.[80] Fasteners, such as elastic clips and pandrols, secure rails to sleepers, allowing controlled movement to mitigate wear from thermal expansion and vibration.[74] Ballasted track, using crushed stone aggregate beneath sleepers, provides drainage, lateral resistance, and adjustability during tamping maintenance, with typical ballast depth of 200-300 mm.[81] Slab track, or ballastless systems embedded in concrete, offers reduced maintenance intervals—up to 60% lower over 40 years—and higher precision for speeds exceeding 300 km/h, though requiring stable subgrades and incurring 20-50% higher initial costs.[82][83] Supporting infrastructure includes embankments raised 5-20 meters for flood-prone or low-lying areas, using compacted earth with geosynthetics for reinforcement; cuttings excavate through hills to maintain gradients under 1.5%; and structures like bridges and tunnels accommodate obstacles, with modern tunnels employing tunnel boring machines for lengths up to 50 km.[84][85] Track alignments incorporate curves with superelevation up to 160 mm and turnouts for branching, designed per standards like UIC 60 kg/m rails for load capacities over 20 tonnes per axle.[86] Maintenance involves ultrasonic rail flaw detection and geometry monitoring to prevent derailments, with ballast renewal cycles every 10-20 years on heavy-haul lines.[87]Signaling, Control, and Electrification
Railway signaling systems authorize train movements, enforce speed restrictions, and prevent collisions by dividing tracks into blocks and using signals to indicate occupancy or permission to proceed. The fundamental principle relies on absolute or automatic block signaling, where each block can occupy only one train at a time, with signals displaying clear, caution, or stop aspects based on the state of subsequent blocks.[88] Early mechanical systems employed semaphores and interlocking frames to physically prevent conflicting switch and signal alignments, with the first interlockings appearing in the 1850s on British railways to coordinate points and signals mechanically.[89] Electrical advancements, including the track circuit invented by William Robinson in 1872, enabled automatic detection of train occupancy by completing an electrical loop through the rails, shunting the circuit when wheels bridge them and dropping signals to stop.[90] Centralized traffic control (CTC) emerged in the 1920s in North America, consolidating signal and switch operations under a central dispatcher using remote electro-pneumatic or electric controls, replacing manual block systems and tower operators to optimize capacity on busy lines.[88] Automatic train control (ATC) systems, introduced in the early 20th century, enforce speed and stopping by transmitting wayside signal aspects to the locomotive cab, with fail-safe enforcement via continuous or intermittent inductors. Positive Train Control (PTC), a GPS- and radio-based overlay mandated by the U.S. Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 following the September 2008 Chatsworth collision that killed 25, integrates continuous location tracking, vital messaging, and automatic braking to prevent collisions, overspeed derailments, and incursions into work zones; by December 2020, all required U.S. Class I railroads achieved full interoperability and operational deployment.[91][92] Railway electrification supplies motive power to trains via fixed infrastructure, typically overhead catenary wires or a third rail, eliminating onboard fuel combustion and enabling regenerative braking for energy recovery. The first functional electric railway demonstration occurred in 1879 by Werner von Siemens on a 300-meter track in Berlin's Gross-Lichterfelde suburb, using a 180-volt DC overhead system for a small locomotive.[93] Commercial adoption accelerated with the 1881 opening of the Gross-Lichterfelde tramway, the world's first electric streetcar line, spanning 11 kilometers at 550 volts DC.[94] Common systems include low-voltage DC third rails (600-750 V) for urban metros due to compact clearance needs, high-voltage DC overhead (1,500-3,000 V) for regional lines, and 15-25 kV AC overhead at industrial frequencies (16.7 Hz in parts of Europe or 50/60 Hz elsewhere) for mainline efficiency over long distances, with AC preferred for reduced transmission losses via transformers on locomotives.[95] Electrification enhances acceleration, reduces operating costs by 20-30% compared to diesel on high-density routes, and lowers emissions, though initial infrastructure costs average $2-5 million per kilometer depending on terrain and voltage.[94]Inspection and Maintenance Systems
Inspection and maintenance systems in rail transport encompass regulatory-mandated protocols and technological tools designed to detect defects in tracks, rolling stock, and infrastructure, thereby mitigating risks of derailments, failures, and operational disruptions. In the United States, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) enforces Track Safety Standards under 49 CFR Part 213, which classify tracks from Class 1 to Class 5 based on maximum speeds and require corresponding inspection frequencies, such as twice-weekly visual examinations for Class 4 and 5 tracks exceeding 60 mph.[96] These standards emphasize track geometry (alignment, gage, elevation), structure (rails, ties, ballast), and roadbed conditions, with railroads designating qualified inspectors to verify compliance.[97] Non-compliance can result in speed restrictions or out-of-service orders, as evidenced by FRA data showing track-related accidents decreased following stricter enforcement post-2000 revisions.[98] Visual inspections remain foundational, conducted manually by walking or using hi-rail vehicles equipped with lasers and cameras to measure parameters like rail profile and cross-level.[99] For internal rail defects, such as transverse fissures or detail fractures, ultrasonic testing vehicles deploy phased-array probes traveling at operational speeds to scan for cracks via sound wave reflections, detecting flaws as small as 0.1 inches with verification required within four hours for certain indications.[100][101] Automated track geometry measurement systems (TGMS), often integrated into revenue-service locomotives, use inertial sensors and GPS to monitor superelevation and curvature deviations continuously, with FRA proposals in 2024 mandating their use alongside visuals at minimum frequencies to address defects proactively.[102] Wayside detection systems monitor rolling stock dynamically, including acoustic bearing detectors (ABD) that identify wheel anomalies via sound signatures and hot axle box detectors sensing overheating bearings through infrared, processing over 3.5 million daily automated checks across North American networks to reduce mechanical failures by alerting crews in real-time.[103][104] Emerging predictive maintenance leverages IoT sensors, machine learning, and onboard diagnostics to forecast component wear—such as pantograph-catenary interactions or switch failures—by analyzing vibration, temperature, and strain data, as implemented by SNCF since 2020 to minimize unplanned downtime through targeted interventions rather than fixed schedules.[105][106] Autonomous systems, including AI-driven drones and rail-bound robots, further enhance coverage by inspecting hard-to-reach areas like bridges and tunnels, integrating with digital twins for holistic asset management.[107] Maintenance regimes blend corrective repairs for identified issues with preventive actions, such as ballast tamping and rail grinding to restore profiles, ensuring longevity; for instance, ultrasonic inspections have identified over 90% of critical rail defects before propagation in tested fleets.[108][109]Operational Frameworks
Ownership and Management Models
Rail ownership models range from fully state-controlled enterprises to private corporations, with management structures often distinguishing between vertically integrated operations—where a single entity controls both infrastructure and train services—and separated models that divide infrastructure management from train operations to promote competition. Vertically integrated systems predominate outside Europe, particularly in freight-heavy networks, as they minimize coordination costs and align incentives for maintenance and capacity utilization. In the United States, for instance, the seven Class I freight railroads, all privately owned, manage approximately 94% of the 140,000 miles of track they operate, achieving high efficiency through private investment; these carriers transported 1.7 trillion ton-miles of freight in 2021, benefiting from deregulation under the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 that reduced regulatory burdens and spurred profitability.[110] In contrast, many European countries adopted vertical separation following EU directives starting in 1991, requiring separation of infrastructure managers (often state-owned) from train operators to enable open access and competition, as seen in Germany's DB Netz AG handling tracks separately from Deutsche Bahn's passenger and freight units. Empirical analyses of such separations yield mixed efficiency outcomes: while competition has increased freight market shares in some separated systems, vertical separation correlates with higher transaction costs and reduced investment incentives in dense networks, potentially undermining overall performance compared to integrated models.[111][112] A survey of studies indicates no consistent efficiency gains from separation, with benefits contingent on regulatory quality and market maturity; for example, integrated systems in Japan and the U.S. exhibit lower unit costs for freight due to streamlined decision-making.[113] Privatization efforts, often involving franchising or concessions for passenger services, have produced varied results globally. The United Kingdom's 1990s privatization separated infrastructure (publicly owned via Network Rail since 2002) from private train operators under short-term franchises, boosting passenger journeys by over 120% from 1994–95 levels to 1.7 billion by 2019, yet it escalated public subsidies to £11.4 billion annually by 2020 amid franchise failures and higher operating costs, challenging claims of unmitigated success.[114] In developing contexts, historical nationalizations post-independence reduced rail mileage expansion outside Europe, with private ownership linked to 20–30% higher network growth rates in pre-1914 data from poor countries.[115] Hybrid models, such as public-private partnerships for concessions in Latin America or Australia's state-owned operators with private freight access, balance investment needs against monopoly risks but require robust regulation to prevent underinvestment in infrastructure.[116] Overall, freight viability favors private, integrated management for cost control, while passenger services often necessitate public oversight due to social mandates and chronic subsidies exceeding £50 billion across Europe in 2022.[117]Scheduling, Dispatch, and Capacity Utilization
Rail scheduling involves the creation of timetables that allocate track time slots to trains, balancing passenger demand, freight priorities, and infrastructure constraints through optimization models such as column-generation algorithms or bi-level programming to minimize delays and maximize throughput.[118][119] In passenger networks, schedules are typically fixed and periodic, with headways determined by origin-destination flows; for instance, high-speed rail corridors like Japan's Shinkansen use demand-oriented timetables with intervals as short as 3-5 minutes during peaks to achieve capacities exceeding 15 trains per hour per direction.[120] Freight scheduling, by contrast, often employs dynamic path allocation to accommodate variable loads, integrating with passenger services via models that reduce conflicts and travel times, as demonstrated in U.S. studies where optimized routing cut freight delays by up to 20%.[121][122] Dispatching oversees real-time train movements, primarily through centralized systems where dispatchers issue authorities for track occupancy and control signals remotely to prevent collisions and resolve conflicts.[123] Centralized Traffic Control (CTC), implemented since the 1920s in North America, enables a single dispatcher to manage multiple routes via panels or software interfaces, automating switch and signal operations to support bidirectional traffic on single tracks and increase line efficiency by 30-50% over manual block systems.[124][125] In modern setups, computer-aided dispatching integrates GPS tracking and predictive algorithms, allowing adjustments for disruptions like maintenance windows, with U.S. Class I railroads relying on CTC for over 70% of mainline operations to maintain fluid freight flows averaging 20-30 trains per day on high-density corridors.[126][127] Capacity utilization measures the ratio of actual to theoretical throughput, often quantified as trains per hour per track or via the UIC 406 compression method, which accounts for buffer times and heterogeneity in train speeds to estimate sustainable loads.[128][129] Theoretical capacities reach 20-24 trains per hour on signalled lines with 2-3 minute headways, but practical utilization averages 60-80% due to recovery buffers, varying speeds, and incidents, as seen in European networks where mixed freight-passenger lines operate at 10-15 trains per hour while freight-only segments in the U.S. handle 1-9 trains per hour on underutilized tracks.[130][131] Higher utilization correlates with elevated maintenance costs—up to 15-20% increases per percentage point of added load—necessitating strategies like positive train control to push rates toward 85% without reliability losses, though dense urban systems like Chicago's CTA achieve near-90% during peaks through precise scheduling.[132][133]Safety Protocols and Incident Analysis
Rail transport employs extensive safety protocols, including automated train control systems, regular infrastructure inspections, and operational training, contributing to fatality rates as low as 0.43 per billion passenger-miles in the United States, compared to 7.3 for highway travel.[134] In the European Union, the passenger fatality risk stands at approximately 0.09 per billion train-kilometers, roughly one-third that of bus travel.[6] These protocols encompass mandatory signaling, grade crossing protections, and speed restrictions tailored to track conditions, enforced by regulatory bodies such as the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) in the US and the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA).[92] Key technological safeguards include Positive Train Control (PTC) in North America, implemented nationwide by 2020 following the 2008 Chatsworth collision that killed 25, which automatically enforces speed limits, prevents collisions, and protects work zones.[92] In Europe, the European Train Control System (ETCS) standardizes cab signaling and automatic train protection across borders to enhance interoperability and reduce signal passed-at-danger incidents.[135] Trackside inspections using ultrasonic testing detect defects like cracks or misalignments, while wayside detectors monitor wheel bearings and brakes to preempt failures.[136] Crew certification requires recurrent training on emergency procedures, fatigue management, and rule compliance, with human factors addressed through simulators and psychological screening. Incident analysis reveals human error as the predominant cause, accounting for a significant portion of accidents, often involving signal violations or misjudged stops, as categorized by FRA data.[137] Track geometry defects and broken rails contribute to derailments, particularly on freight lines with heavy axle loads, while equipment failures like overheated bearings represent another category.[136] Investigations by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and FRA have driven improvements, such as a 74% decline in train accidents since 1978 and a 35% reduction in grade crossing incidents through barriers and warning upgrades.[137][138] Post-incident causal analyses, emphasizing root causes over blame, inform regulatory enhancements like PTC mandates, yielding measurable safety gains without relying on unsubstantiated narratives from biased institutional reports.[139]Financing Mechanisms and Cost Structures
Rail transport financing relies on a combination of public subsidies, private investment, and revenue from operations, with mechanisms varying by ownership model and region. In publicly owned systems, governments often provide direct capital grants or loans for infrastructure development, as seen in the United States where federal funding through the Federal Railroad Administration supported $4.3 million for rail access projects in Illinois.[140] Private freight operators, prevalent in North America, primarily self-finance through internal revenues and debt instruments like bonds, achieving higher cost recovery rates without routine subsidies.[141] Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have emerged globally to bridge funding gaps, particularly for high-capital projects; for instance, the Luxembourg Rail Protocol facilitates private investment in rolling stock via structured finance under the Cape Town Convention, reducing public fiscal burdens.[142] Passenger rail frequently depends on subsidies to cover shortfalls, with farebox recovery ratios often below 50% in many systems, contrasting with freight rail's ability to generate profits from volume-based charges.[143] In Europe, PPPs for high-speed lines, such as build-operate-transfer models, allocate risks where private entities handle construction and operations in exchange for revenue shares, though outcomes depend on traffic forecasts and regulatory stability.[144] Alternative mechanisms include availability payments, where governments compensate private operators for asset performance, and value capture from adjacent development, though empirical evidence shows mixed success in low-middle income countries due to limited private sector capacity.[145] Cost structures in rail are characterized by high upfront capital expenditures and relatively low marginal operating costs per additional unit transported, enabling economies of density. Capital costs dominate, encompassing track laying (e.g., $2.2–2.6 million per km for high-speed double track on upgraded beds), signaling, and electrification, often comprising 60–80% of total project budgets in greenfield developments.[146] Operating costs break down into fixed elements like depreciation and maintenance of way (20–30% of total), semivariable maintenance of equipment (15–25%), and variable fuel/labor (10–20%), with freight operations showing lower personnel ratios than passenger services due to automation and longer hauls.[147]| Cost Category | Typical Share (%) | Key Components | Example (Annual, per Locomotive) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital/Depreciation | 40–60 | Track, rolling stock, stations | $200,000 (over 25 years for $5M loco)[148] |
| Maintenance (Infrastructure/Equipment) | 20–30 | Right-of-way, repairs | Varies by traffic density |
| Labor and Energy | 15–25 | Crew, fuel/electricity | Higher in passenger due to frequency |
| Other (Administration, Overhead) | 5–15 | Regulatory compliance | Influenced by union contracts |
Economic Dimensions
Efficiency Metrics and Comparative Advantages
Rail freight achieves energy efficiencies of approximately 0.2 MJ per tonne-kilometre for electric systems and 0.3-0.4 MJ for diesel, compared to 1.5-2.0 MJ per tonne-kilometre for heavy trucks on similar hauls, enabling rail to consume up to six times less energy per unit transported than road freight.[151][152] This stems from rail's steel-on-steel friction, which reduces rolling resistance by factors of 5-10 relative to rubber tires on roads, and its capacity to assemble trains carrying 5,000-20,000 tonnes, spreading fixed energy costs over vast payloads. Operating costs reflect this, with U.S. rail averaging 4-5 U.S. cents per revenue ton-mile in 2023, versus 15-25 cents for long-haul trucking after normalizing for distance and load factors.[153][154] ![Alaska Railroad oil train][float-right] For distances exceeding 500 kilometres, rail's marginal cost per additional tonne-kilometre drops below trucking equivalents due to high fixed infrastructure amortization against throughput, yielding productivity advantages in bulk commodities like coal, grain, or intermodal containers where origin-destination pairs align with fixed routes.[155] Trucking retains edges in door-to-door flexibility and shorter hauls under 300 kilometres, but rail's network effects—interlining across operators—amplify scale efficiencies, with U.S. Class I railroads moving 40% of long-distance freight tonnage at costs 3-4 times lower per ton-mile than trucks for volumes over 1,000 miles.[16] Capacity utilization metrics further underscore rail's superiority, as trains sustain 70-90% load factors on dedicated lines versus trucks' variable 50-70%, minimizing empty backhauls.[156] Passenger rail efficiency centers on high-density corridors, where energy use averages 0.1-0.2 MJ per passenger-kilometre at 70-80% occupancy, outperforming automobiles (1.5-2.5 MJ) by factors of 4-8 and short-haul flights (1.0-1.5 MJ including airport operations) by 2-5 times on routes under 800 kilometres.[157] Economically, this translates to operating costs of 5-10 U.S. cents per passenger-mile for electrified high-speed systems like Japan's Shinkansen, versus 20-50 cents for equivalent air travel when factoring ground access and delays, though rail requires subsidies in low-density areas to compete on speed.[158] Comparative advantages emerge in urban-intercity links, where rail's predictable scheduling boosts labor productivity by reducing modal shifts, but air dominates transcontinental routes due to velocity-time trade-offs beyond 1,000 kilometres.[159]| Metric | Rail Freight (per tonne-km) | Truck Freight (per tonne-km) | Rail Passenger (per p-km) | Air Passenger (per p-km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Intensity (MJ) | 0.2-0.4 | 1.5-2.0 | 0.1-0.2 | 1.0-1.5 |
| Cost (U.S. cents equiv.) | 0.5-1.0 | 2.0-4.0 | 0.5-1.0 | 2.0-5.0 |
| Capacity Utilization (%) | 70-90 | 50-70 | 60-80 | 70-85 |
Freight Transport Economics
Rail freight operations exhibit a cost structure dominated by high fixed expenses for infrastructure maintenance, capital investments in locomotives and rolling stock, and network capacity, contrasted with low variable costs per ton-mile for fuel, labor, and operations once trains are in motion. This structure fosters significant economies of scale and density, where increased traffic volume over existing tracks reduces average costs substantially, as evidenced by empirical analyses showing returns to density in the U.S. railroad industry that enable efficient handling of bulk commodities over long distances.[161][149] Railroads employ differential pricing strategies, charging higher rates for lower-density or time-sensitive shipments to cross-subsidize bulk traffic, ensuring contributions to fixed costs across diverse commodity groups while adhering to regulatory standards that prevent pricing below variable costs.[162] In comparison to trucking, rail freight demonstrates lower costs per ton-mile, typically ranging from 3 to 5 cents in mature markets like North America, versus 15 to 25 cents for trucks, particularly advantageous for hauls exceeding 500 miles involving commodities such as coal, grain, or intermodal containers. For instance, in 2023, rail transport costs for a ton over 1,000 miles averaged around $160, equating to approximately 16 cents per ton-mile when factoring in recent inflationary pressures, yet still competitive due to rail's superior fuel efficiency of about 470 ton-miles per gallon compared to trucks' 134 ton-miles per gallon.[154][163][164] This efficiency stems from rail's ability to move massive tonnages in single trains—often equivalent to hundreds of trucks—minimizing energy use per unit of freight, though rail's inflexibility in last-mile delivery necessitates intermodal combinations that can elevate total logistics costs to around $95 per net ton for hybrid rail-truck routes.[155][165] Economically, rail freight's viability hinges on network utilization and commodity suitability, with global market value estimated at $326 billion in 2025, projected to grow at 4.5% CAGR driven by demand for sustainable bulk transport in regions like Asia and Europe. In the U.S., freight railroads operate without direct federal operating subsidies, self-financing track maintenance and expansions through private revenues, in contrast to road freight where the Highway Trust Fund provides taxpayer-supported infrastructure that benefits trucking without equivalent user fees covering full costs.[166][167] This self-reliance underscores rail's market-driven efficiency for high-volume corridors, though regulatory and infrastructural barriers limit modal shifts from road, perpetuating road's dominance in shorter, fragmented hauls despite higher societal costs including congestion and accidents.[168]Passenger Rail Viability
Passenger rail services globally face challenges in achieving financial self-sufficiency due to high fixed costs for infrastructure and rolling stock, coupled with competition from more flexible automobiles and aircraft. Operating losses are common, with public subsidies essential for most operators to cover deficits after ticket revenues. For instance, empirical analyses indicate low price elasticity of demand for rail travel, limiting revenue potential without volume thresholds met only in high-density corridors.[169] In the United States, Amtrak's national network exemplifies dependency on subsidies, reporting a $757 million operating deficit in fiscal year 2023 despite a 31% ridership increase to 28.6 million passengers. Total federal and state funding reached $3.8 billion that year, underscoring that even established services fail to break even on operations alone, with long-distance routes like the Sunset Limited incurring per-passenger subsidies exceeding $500.[170][171][172] European passenger rail similarly relies on substantial public support, with subsidies comprising approximately 30% of the sector's €110 billion annual costs as of recent estimates, or around €33 billion continent-wide. National operators like Germany's Deutsche Bahn report operational profits in select segments but offset overall losses through cross-subsidies and infrastructure funding, as evidenced by DB's €1.94 profit per train-mile against €36.78 in public contributions. Liberalization efforts have introduced competition, yet open-access high-speed operators often require public service contracts to sustain low fares, indicating persistent unprofitability without state backing.[173][174] High-speed rail offers limited exceptions to this pattern, primarily where extreme population density supports high utilization. Japan's Tokaido Shinkansen line, linking Tokyo and Osaka, achieves profitability for operator JR Central, generating 50-60% of earnings as profit through massive ridership in a corridor of over 50 million people. However, this success stems from dedicated tracks avoiding freight interference and fares calibrated to demand, while less dense extensions remain subsidized; broader Shinkansen infrastructure benefits from government investment in land acquisition and maintenance. France's TGV network, by contrast, contributes to SNCF's overall losses, reliant on state recapitalization despite modal shifts from air travel.[175][176] Cost structures further constrain viability: full societal costs for high-speed rail approximate $0.235 per passenger-kilometer, comparable to highways at $0.230 but excluding user flexibility premiums that favor cars for short trips and planes for distances over 800 km. Rail's advantages in energy efficiency—lower per-passenger-km consumption than solo driving—do not translate to market dominance without route rigidity addressed via integration with feeders like buses or metros. Empirical evidence from investment studies highlights that benefits accrue mainly to accessible stations, with spillover economic gains often overstated absent rigorous controls for pre-existing growth.[177][178] Viability thus demands specific conditions: corridors with 10+ million potential annual passengers, average speeds exceeding 200 km/h to compete with flights, and policy measures like congestion pricing on alternatives to boost modal share. Absent these, subsidies distort resource allocation, as seen in underutilized lines where opportunity costs exceed social benefits from reduced emissions or decongested roads.[179]Contributions to Productivity and Trade
Rail transport has historically enhanced productivity by drastically reducing freight costs and enabling the integration of disparate markets, as evidenced by the expansion of U.S. railroads in the 19th century, which lowered transportation expenses for goods like coal and iron, fostering industrial growth and national market formation.[180] The completion of the Transcontinental Railroad in 1869 exemplified this, spurring a production boom through efficient resource extraction and distribution across the continent, with railroads consuming vast quantities of materials while facilitating westward agricultural shifts by 1890.[181][182] In Europe and Sweden, similar rail expansions during the 1800s drove rural industrialization and structural economic transformation by connecting producers to urban centers.[183] In terms of trade, rail networks have supported bulk commodity movements critical to global exchange, with U.S. railroads handling nearly 40% of their traffic linked to international trade in 2023, including exports like grain and imports of automobiles, thereby connecting domestic producers to overseas markets.[184] This role persists globally, where rail freight underpins socio-economic growth by enabling high-volume, long-distance hauls; for instance, the U.S. rail system accounted for 28% of national freight by ton-miles in recent years, outperforming trucks in energy efficiency for heavy loads.[16] Efficiency gains are quantified by metrics such as revenue per ton-mile, where inflation-adjusted U.S. rail rates fell 46% from 1981 to 2017, reflecting productivity improvements through technological advancements like larger trains and optimized routing.[185] Contemporary contributions to productivity include substantial economic multipliers: each dollar invested in U.S. rail generates $2.50 in broader activity, supporting jobs in logistics and manufacturing, while the sector added $233.4 billion to the U.S. economy in 2023 via direct freight operations and induced effects.[186][187] In the EU, rail activities similarly bolster GDP through freight and ancillary services, with 2023 data showing sustained contributions despite varying national infrastructures.[188] Rail's causal role in trade productivity stems from its capacity for low-cost, high-capacity transport—evident in fuel use of about 1.06 gallons per 1,000 gross ton-miles industry-wide—allowing industries to scale output without proportional logistics cost hikes, though benefits accrue most to bulk sectors like mining and agriculture rather than high-value, time-sensitive goods.[189] Overall, empirical studies affirm rail infrastructure's positive output elasticity, typically around 0.1-0.2 in meta-analyses of transport investments, underscoring its enduring, if context-dependent, boost to economic efficiency.[190]Environmental Realities
Energy Consumption Patterns
Rail transport exhibits energy consumption patterns marked by low intensity per unit of output, driven by high load capacities, streamlined operations, and traction efficiencies. Freight services typically record an energy intensity of 0.22 megajoules (MJ) per tonne-kilometer (tkm), reflecting optimized heavy-haul configurations that minimize resistance and maximize throughput.[191] Passenger operations vary more widely, with intensities around 0.21 MJ per passenger-kilometer (pkm) for high-speed systems under typical loads, rising with lower occupancy or higher speeds due to aerodynamic drag.[192] These metrics underscore rail's structural advantages in distributing energy across multiple units, though actual consumption hinges on network-specific variables. Traction type profoundly shapes patterns, with electrified rail outperforming diesel due to conversion efficiencies of approximately 90% versus 30%, enabling lower final energy input for equivalent work.[193] In 2022, global rail energy derived 53% from diesel and 45% from electricity, but passenger activity exceeded 85% electrification, correlating with reduced per-unit demands in dense networks like Europe's.[158] Diesel-dominant freight lines, prevalent in North America, sustain higher absolute consumption but maintain competitive intensities through long-haul economies; electrification shifts, as in India's 80% track coverage by 2022, further compress these by leveraging grid-scale generation.[158] Operational factors modulate consumption systematically. Speed escalates energy quadratically via drag, while gradients demand up to 19% more for 2‰ inclines; curves and acceleration phases compound this through lateral forces and inertial losses.[194] Load factors amplify efficiency—full trains dilute fixed overheads, yielding 60-80% lower intensity than solo vehicles per equivalent distance.[195] External elements like temperature affect viscosity and adhesion, with cold weather increasing resistance by 5-10% in unheated systems. Infrastructure quality, including track alignment and signaling for coasting, influences patterns; poorly maintained lines elevate consumption via friction.[196] Historical trends reveal efficiency gains from technological and organizational refinements. From 2005 to 2015, passenger rail energy per pkm fell 18.2%, and freight per tkm declined 19.2%, attributable to lighter materials, regenerative braking, and optimized routing.[197] Globally, rail handled 7% of passenger-km and 6% of tonne-km in 2022 yet consumed under 2% of transport energy, a pattern persisting amid modal shifts toward denser corridors.[158] These dynamics affirm rail's causal edge in bulk movement, though isolated underutilization—such as empty backhauls—can inflate effective intensities by 20-50%.[198]| Category | Energy Intensity | Key Influencer | Source Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freight Rail | 0.22 MJ/tkm | Load and electrification | 2019[191] |
| High-Speed Passenger Rail | 0.21 MJ/pkm | Occupancy and speed | Recent[192] |
| Conventional Passenger Rail | 0.1-0.3 MJ/pkm | Traction type and network density | 2021[199] |
Emissions Profiles and Lifecycle Assessments
Rail transport's operational emissions vary significantly by propulsion type, electrification status, and electricity grid composition. Diesel-powered locomotives emit approximately 20-40 grams of CO2 equivalent per passenger-kilometer (g CO2eq/pkm) for passenger services and 10-20 g CO2eq per tonne-kilometer (tkm) for freight, reflecting combustion efficiency and high load factors typical of rail operations.[200][201] Electrified rail shifts emissions to upstream electricity production, yielding 5-35 g CO2eq/pkm for passengers in grids with substantial low-carbon sources like nuclear or renewables, though figures rise to 50-100 g CO2eq/pkm in coal-dominant systems such as parts of China or India.[202][203] High-speed rail (HSR) operational emissions average 10-15 g CO2eq/pkm in Europe due to aerodynamic penalties offset by efficiency gains, but lifecycle inclusion elevates this to 20-40 g CO2eq/pkm when amortizing infrastructure.[204] Lifecycle assessments (LCAs) encompass construction, maintenance, operation, and decommissioning, revealing that infrastructure—primarily track, electrification, and stations—accounts for 20-50% of total emissions over a rail line's 50-100 year lifespan. Embodied emissions from constructing double-track electrified rail range from 50-200 tonnes CO2eq per kilometer, dominated by steel and concrete production, with annual amortization yielding 1-5 g CO2eq/pkm at high utilization rates above 10 billion pkm per line.[205][206] Rolling stock manufacturing adds 5-10 g CO2eq/pkm when spread across 20-40 year service lives and millions of kilometers traveled. Peer-reviewed LCAs of European HSR, such as France's TGV network, report total emissions of 10-20 g CO2eq/pkm, while Asian HSR systems reach 30-50 g CO2eq/pkm due to higher construction intensities and fossil-fuel heavy grids.[202][204] Freight rail LCAs show even lower profiles, with totals under 15 g CO2eq/tkm, as heavy utilization (often 50-100 billion tkm per network annually) dilutes upfront costs.[207]| Aspect | Passenger Rail (g CO2eq/pkm) | Freight Rail (g CO2eq/tkm) | Key Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operational (Diesel) | 20-40 | 10-20 | Fuel efficiency, load factor >70%[200][208] |
| Operational (Electric, EU grid) | 10-30 | 5-15 | Grid decarbonization; e.g., France nuclear mix lowers to <10 g[202][209] |
| Infrastructure Amortized | 1-5 | 0.5-2 | Track life 50+ years; steel/concrete dominate[205][206] |
| Total Lifecycle (HSR example) | 20-50 | 10-20 | Varies by region; higher in fossil grids[204][210] |
Comparisons to Alternative Transport Modes
Rail transport exhibits lower greenhouse gas emissions intensity compared to road and air modes for both freight and passenger services, primarily due to higher load factors and energy efficiency in steel-wheel-on-steel-rail systems. For freight, rail typically emits 10-30 grams of CO2 equivalent per tonne-kilometer (g CO2e/t-km), versus 50-150 g CO2e/t-km for maritime shipping, 100-200 g CO2e/t-km for heavy-duty trucks, and over 1,000 g CO2e/t-km for air cargo.[158][213] These figures derive from operational data accounting for average utilization rates, with rail's advantage stemming from economies of scale in hauling bulk commodities over long distances, though diesel-powered rail lines yield higher emissions than electrified ones drawing from low-carbon grids.[214] In lifecycle assessments incorporating vehicle manufacturing, fuel production, and infrastructure maintenance, rail freight still outperforms trucks by 70-80% in emissions per t-km, as rail's durable infrastructure amortizes costs over high volumes, while truck wear-and-tear drives frequent replacements.[215][216] Air freight, constrained by fuel inefficiency at low altitudes, registers the highest impacts, often exceeding rail by factors of 40-50. Inland waterways rival or undercut rail for emissions (5-20 g CO2e/t-km) but lack flexibility for non-riverine routes.[213] For passengers, electrified rail achieves 10-50 g CO2e per passenger-kilometer (p-km), far below cars (120-200 g CO2e/p-km at average occupancy of 1.5), buses (50-100 g CO2e/p-km), and aircraft (100-250 g CO2e/p-km, higher for short-haul due to takeoff inefficiencies).[217][158] High-speed rail amplifies this edge over aviation for distances under 800 km, reducing emissions by 80-90% versus short domestic flights, though grid carbon intensity modulates outcomes—coal-dependent electricity erodes rail's benefits relative to efficient hybrids.[203] Urban rail systems like metros emit under 20 g CO2e/p-km when electrified, outperforming motorized road options but trailing walking or cycling in absolute terms.[158]| Transport Mode | Freight (g CO2e/t-km) | Passenger (g CO2e/p-km) |
|---|---|---|
| Rail (electrified) | 10-20 | 10-30 |
| Rail (diesel) | 20-40 | 30-60 |
| Truck/Road | 100-200 | 120-200 (car) |
| Ship (inland) | 5-20 | N/A |
| Airplane | >1,000 | 100-250 |
Sustainability Claims and Empirical Evidence
Proponents of rail transport often claim it offers superior sustainability compared to road and air modes, citing lower energy use and greenhouse gas emissions per unit of transport due to high load factors and electric propulsion potential. Empirical data supports reduced operational emissions for rail under optimal conditions: international rail freight averages approximately 18 grams of CO₂ per tonne-kilometer, compared to 80-100 grams for heavy trucks, reflecting rail's mechanical efficiency in hauling large volumes over fixed infrastructure.[218][219] For passengers, electrified rail emits around 35-46 grams of CO₂ per passenger-kilometer, versus 170 grams for average petrol cars and over 100 grams for short-haul flights (excluding non-CO₂ effects like contrails).[217][202] These figures derive from well-to-wheel analyses, accounting for fuel production, and hold particularly for high-occupancy scenarios where rail's scale amortizes fixed costs.[158] However, such advantages hinge on electrification and clean energy sources; globally, freight rail remains 75% diesel-powered, elevating emissions closer to road equivalents in non-electrified networks like much of North America.[158] Diesel locomotives emit substantially more CO₂ and pollutants than electric ones drawing from low-carbon grids, with U.S. rail contributing 35 million tonnes of CO₂ annually from diesel-electric drives alone.[220] In regions with carbon-intensive electricity (e.g., coal-heavy grids), electric rail's lifecycle emissions can rival or exceed efficient diesel trucks, undermining claims of inherent superiority.[221] Load factors further modulate outcomes: underutilized passenger services inflate per-passenger emissions, while freight benefits require consistent high-volume hauls to offset infrastructure demands. Systematic reviews confirm operations dominate GHG profiles (e.g., 92% in urban metros), but mitigation via renewables could cut emissions by up to 65% in scenarios like China's rail shift to cleaner mixes.[209] Lifecycle assessments reveal construction and maintenance add upfront burdens, though these comprise less than 15% of total emissions over decades for rail versus higher operational shares for roads. Rail infrastructure emits more CO₂ during building (e.g., concrete and steel-intensive tracks) than equivalent highways per kilometer, but operational savings recoup this over 50-60 years at high utilization rates.[222][223] Comparative studies, such as Austria's national rail network, quantify embodied GHGs from materials but emphasize that rail's total footprint remains lower than road expansions when modal shifts reduce vehicle-kilometers traveled. Caveats persist: without dense networks and electrification (passenger rail at 85% globally, freight at 55%), sustainability claims falter, as evidenced by stagnant U.S. rail CO₂ peaks post-2019 despite efficiency gains.[158][224] Sources like industry reports (e.g., UIC) may understate dependencies on policy-driven electrification, while peer-reviewed lifecycle models provide robust, conditional evidence favoring rail for bulk, long-haul applications over fragmented road use.[209]Broader Impacts
Social Mobility and Urban Form
Rail transport has historically shaped urban form by fostering radial development patterns centered on stations, enabling population concentration and economic activity without the dispersed sprawl associated with later automobile dominance. In 19th-century England and Wales, railways facilitated rapid urbanization, with urban population share rising from 20% in 1801 to 50% by 1851, as rail connections integrated rural areas into urban economies and supported industrial agglomeration.[225] This contrasted with pre-rail eras where waterways limited growth to linear corridors, demonstrating rail's causal role in compact, node-based city structures through efficient mass movement.[226] In modern contexts, urban rail systems continue to influence city morphology by promoting transit-oriented development (TOD), where high-density mixed-use zones emerge around stations, countering automobile-induced sprawl. For instance, London's rail network from the late 19th to early 20th century supported contained urban expansion, maintaining higher densities compared to Los Angeles, where early rail decline and auto rise led to fragmented, low-density forms by the 1930s.[227] Empirical analyses show rail transit reduces overall urban sprawl by concentrating accessibility, with station proximity correlating to 10-20% higher land values and denser built environments in cities like those with metro expansions.[228] Relocating or adding rail stations can redirect growth, as seen in case studies where new lines spurred polycentric forms with reduced peripheral expansion.[229] Rail's enhancement of social mobility stems from improved access to employment and services, particularly for lower-income groups reliant on public transit. Studies indicate that light rail investments increase local employment rates by connecting workers to distant jobs, with one analysis finding significant associations in U.S. cities like Portland, where transit access raised employment by up to 5-10% for underserved populations.[230] Infrastructure like regional rails breaks intergenerational occupational persistence, as evidenced by Colombian rail expansions boosting children's long-term labor opportunities by 15-20% through better job matching.[231] In urban settings, rail networks reduce spatial mismatches, with accessibility improvements in areas like Liverpool correlating to higher socioeconomic inclusion, though benefits vary by network coverage and equity in station placement.[232] These effects hold despite academic tendencies toward optimistic projections, grounded in ward-level data showing causal links via reduced travel barriers.[233]Strategic and Military Applications
Railroads have historically enabled militaries to achieve rapid concentration of forces and sustainment of large armies over extended distances, transforming warfare from localized engagements to theater-wide operations dependent on logistical networks.[234] In the American Civil War (1861–1865), the Union Army's control and extension of rail lines facilitated the movement of over 2 million troops and vast supplies, contributing decisively to Northern victories by outpacing Confederate capabilities; for instance, General Joseph E. Johnston utilized the Manassas Gap Railroad to reinforce positions at the First Battle of Bull Run in July 1861.[235] [236] This era marked the first widespread military exploitation of rail for tactical mobility, with the U.S. Military Railroads constructing or repairing over 700 miles of track under combat conditions to support advances. During World War I (1914–1918), railroads formed the backbone of logistics for static fronts, transporting millions of tons of munitions, food, and reinforcements; the Imperial German Army's Schlieffen Plan relied on precise rail schedules to mobilize 1.5 million men toward France in August 1914, though delays eroded initial advantages.[237] Allied forces, including the U.S., moved 1.8 million troops via rail from camps to ports between 1917 and 1918, averaging 421 men per special train at speeds up to 19.8 miles per hour.[238] In World War II (1939–1945), U.S. railroads handled 90% of military freight and 97% of organized troop movements, peaking at 70% of national freight in 1940 and surging thereafter to deploy equipment like tanks and artillery across continents. Axis powers similarly prioritized rail for the Eastern Front, where the Wehrmacht transported over 3 million troops and supplies via networks like the Polish State Railways, though Allied bombing and partisan sabotage disrupted 40% of German rail capacity by 1944.[239] Strategically, rail infrastructure has dictated campaign objectives, as control of junctions and lines allowed for sustained offensives while denial via destruction crippled adversaries; in both world wars, rail yards emerged as prime targets for air strikes and special operations, underscoring their dual role as enablers and vulnerabilities.[240] Militaries have deployed specialized units, such as the U.S. Army's Transportation Corps rail battalions, to operate and repair lines under fire, enhancing tactical flexibility by delivering heavy loads at 10–15 mph over hundreds of miles—far surpassing wagon trains.[240] Armored trains, equipped with artillery and machine guns, saw limited use for rail security and reconnaissance, as in British operations in East Africa (1916–1918) and Soviet defenses during the Winter War (1939–1940), though their immobility against air and mechanized threats confined them to niche roles.[234] In contemporary contexts, rail remains integral to strategic mobility for peer competitors, facilitating bulk prepositioning of armor, fuel, and munitions; the U.S. Department of Defense relies on commercial freight rail to shift 70–80% of equipment from bases to embarkation ports, as demonstrated in deployments for Operations Desert Shield (1990) and Iraqi Freedom (2003).[239] NATO and EU initiatives, including the Permanent Structured Cooperation's Military Mobility project launched in 2017, emphasize rail interoperability to counter threats like Russian logistics, which depend on the Trans-Siberian Railway for 60% of heavy transport in potential Pacific theaters.[241] However, fixed rail's susceptibility to precision strikes, cyber disruption, and gauge mismatches limits its frontline utility in high-intensity conflicts, prompting hybrid approaches with trucking for last-mile flexibility while preserving rail for efficient, high-volume sustainment.[242]Global Development Correlations
The expansion of rail networks in the 19th century closely paralleled industrialization in Europe and North America, where railway construction facilitated the transport of coal, iron, and manufactured goods, reducing freight costs by up to 80% in some regions and enabling market integration across distances previously prohibitive for bulk commodities.[243] In Britain, rail mileage grew from 98 miles in 1830 to over 6,000 miles by 1843, coinciding with a GDP per capita increase from approximately £1,700 to £2,300 (in 1990 dollars) by mid-century, as rails lowered barriers to trade and labor mobility.[244] Similar patterns emerged in the United States, where 22,000 miles of track laid between 1850 and 1860 supported industrial output growth averaging 4-5% annually, by connecting resource-rich interiors to coastal ports and urban markets.[243] Empirical studies confirm positive correlations between rail infrastructure density and economic indicators globally, with access to rail lines associated with higher per capita GDP growth rates across sectors, as evidenced by analyses of transport improvements in developing economies.[245] World Bank research attributes about one-third of observed GDP per capita increases in infrastructure-expanded regions to transport networks, including rail, which enhance productivity through efficient factor allocation without varying effects across development levels.[246] In Turkey, rail investments as "hard" infrastructure correlated with both economic growth and population density rises, underscoring causal links via reduced logistics costs.[247] However, these correlations hold strongest when rail complements industrial bases; in resource-extraction colonies, early networks prioritized export routes over broad development, limiting spillover benefits.[248] Contemporary data reveal that nations with extensive rail systems, such as China, experienced accelerated growth post-expansion: high-speed rail openings boosted local GDP per capita by an average of 3,390 RMB, driven by enhanced connectivity and agglomeration effects.[249] Globally, rail network length per capita correlates with higher Human Development Index scores in Europe, where densities exceed 50 km per 1,000 km² in countries like Germany and Switzerland, versus sparse networks in low-density, automobile-reliant economies like the United States.[250] Yet, causality remains bidirectional—prosperous economies invest more in rail maintenance and electrification, as seen in OECD nations where electrified rail shares exceed 50%, supporting sustained productivity gains amid urbanization.[251] These patterns affirm rail's role in enabling scale economies and trade volumes, though empirical evidence tempers claims of universal causality, emphasizing integration with complementary policies like deregulation and private investment.[252]Controversies and Debates
High-Speed Rail Initiatives: Achievements vs Overruns
Japan's Shinkansen network, operational since 1964, exemplifies achievements in high-speed rail through unparalleled safety and reliability. The system has recorded zero passenger fatalities from derailments or collisions over decades of service, attributed to dedicated tracks, earthquake detection systems, and rigorous maintenance protocols.[253] Average delays stand at 12 seconds per train, enabling high-frequency operations up to 285 km/h and supporting economic integration by halving travel times between major cities like Tokyo and Osaka.[254] This punctuality and capacity have driven ridership peaks exceeding 350 million annually pre-2011, fostering regional development, tourism, and business connectivity with estimated economic benefits in billions of dollars.[255][256] China's high-speed rail expansion represents scale-oriented success, with the network surpassing 50,000 km by mid-2025, dwarfing global peers and reshaping domestic mobility.[257] Annual ridership reached over 2.5 billion trips in 2024, facilitating rapid urbanization and inter-city commerce at speeds up to 350 km/h on lines like Beijing-Shanghai.[258] State-directed construction, leveraging centralized planning and imported technology from Japan and Europe, enabled this growth from near-zero in 2008, though profitability remains challenged by high debt levels exceeding network investment costs.[257][259] In contrast, Western high-speed rail initiatives frequently encounter severe cost overruns and delays, undermining viability. California's project, voter-approved in 2008 with a $33 billion estimate for San Francisco to Los Angeles by 2020, escalated to $128 billion by 2023, with partial segments like Merced to Bakersfield costing over $200 million per mile amid land disputes and regulatory hurdles.[260][261] The UK's HS2, initially budgeted at £32.7 billion in 2010 for London-Birmingham, ballooned beyond £100 billion by 2023 due to inflation, scope changes, and environmental litigation, prompting route curtailments.[262] European studies document average overruns of 15-26% for high-speed lines, exacerbated by optimistic forecasting and fragmented governance, as in Italy's lines where costs doubled initial projections while demand fell short.[263][264]| Project | Initial Cost Estimate | Current/Updated Cost | Overrun Percentage | Key Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California HSR (Phase 1) | $33 billion (2008) | $128 billion (2023) | ~288% | Regulatory delays, land acquisition, lawsuits[260][265] |
| UK HS2 (Phase 1) | £32.7 billion (2010) | >£100 billion (2023) | >200% | Scope creep, inflation, opposition[262] |
| Italy HSR Lines (e.g., Turin-Milan) | Varied, often under €10B/km equiv. | Doubled in cases | ~100%+ | Demand overestimation, construction variances[264] |
Subsidy Dependencies and Market Interventions
Rail passenger services worldwide exhibit significant dependency on government subsidies to cover operating deficits, with fare revenues often recovering less than full costs due to high fixed infrastructure expenses and competition from automobiles and air travel. In the United States, Amtrak received $3.8 billion in federal and state subsidies in fiscal year 2023, equivalent to substantial per-passenger support amid ongoing operating losses.[171] European rail operators similarly rely on public funding, where subsidies enable higher ridership—averaging about 500 train trips per capita annually—but mask underlying economic unviability without such interventions, as private operators struggle to achieve cost recovery without state backing.[268] In contrast, freight rail in deregulated markets like the U.S. demonstrates greater self-sufficiency, with private railroads investing approximately $23 billion annually from internal funds, achieving operating efficiencies that obviate the need for direct subsidies.[269] Cost recovery ratios underscore this divide: Amtrak's systemwide ratio hovered near 99% in fiscal year 2019 before declining post-pandemic, with long-distance routes often below 50% and select corridors like the Northeast Regional exceeding 130% only through dense demand.[270][271] Globally, urban and intercity passenger rail farebox recovery rarely surpasses 50-70% without subsidies, reflecting causal factors such as inelastic demand in low-density areas and the absence of pricing flexibility under regulated fares.[272] These dependencies arise from rail's capital-intensive nature—track and signaling costs amortized over variable utilization—contrasting with road transport's implicit subsidies via general taxation, which distort modal competition by underpricing automotive externalities.[171] Market interventions have historically shaped rail's subsidy landscape, including nationalizations to consolidate fragmented networks post-19th-century booms and privatizations aimed at injecting efficiency. In Britain, the 1990s privatization fragmented British Rail into over 100 entities, boosting passenger miles by 50% but escalating subsidies to £4-5 billion annually by the 2010s due to infrastructure bottlenecks and franchise risks, prompting partial renationalization via public operators like London North Eastern Railway in 2018.[273][274] Japan's 1987 restructuring of the debt-laden Japanese National Railways into seven private entities reduced subsidies through vertical separation and competition, yielding profitability in urban commuter services while rural lines retained public support.[275] Such reforms highlight causal tensions: nationalization fosters unified planning but entrenches bureaucratic inefficiencies, whereas privatization enhances service responsiveness yet amplifies subsidy needs if monopolistic track access persists without contestable markets.[276] Regulatory interventions, including gauge mandates and safety rules, further entwine rail with state oversight, often prioritizing social equity over profitability—evident in China's subsidies for Belt and Road freight corridors, which covered up to 50% of Europe-Asia rail costs to stimulate volumes, though abrupt cuts risk network overloads.[277] Empirical assessments from libertarian-leaning analyses, such as those by the Cato Institute, argue subsidies represent opportunity costs, diverting funds from higher-return infrastructure like highways, while pro-rail advocates cite unmonetized benefits like congestion relief; however, lifecycle data indicate passenger rail's viability hinges on sustained public commitment rather than market signals alone.[171][269] In Asia-Europe contexts, state-backed pricing distorts trade flows, underscoring how interventions can yield short-term geopolitical gains at the expense of long-term fiscal realism.[278]Gauge Standardization and Interoperability Challenges
The rail gauge, defined as the distance between the inner faces of the parallel rails, varies globally, with the 1,435 mm standard gauge—derived from early 19th-century British designs by George Stephenson and formalized by the International Union of Railways in 1937—dominating approximately 60% of the world's rail network length.[279] This gauge originated from horse-drawn wagon ways adapted for steam locomotives, prioritizing compatibility with existing infrastructure over optimized stability, though it has proven sufficient for high-speed operations up to 500 km/h on dedicated tracks, as evidenced by systems in China and Japan.[77] Non-standard gauges persist due to historical contingencies, such as colonial engineering choices or perceived engineering benefits like enhanced curve stability from broader tracks, but these deviations impose persistent operational frictions without commensurate long-term advantages in capacity or safety when scaled across integrated networks.[280] Breaks of gauge occur where networks of differing widths meet, preventing direct passage of rolling stock and requiring interventions like cargo transshipment, bogie exchanges, or axle adjustments, which elevate freight handling costs by 20-50% and introduce delays of several hours per crossing.[281] In historical cases, such as 19th-century Britain and the United States, multiple gauges fragmented trade efficiency, with standardization efforts reducing all-rail shipping costs by eliminating fixed interchange expenses equivalent to 10-15% of total transport fees.[282] Contemporary examples include Russia's 1,520 mm broad gauge interfacing with Europe's 1,435 mm standard, necessitating reloading at borders like Poland-Belarus, which disrupts container flows and amplifies logistics expenses amid rising Eurasian trade volumes.[283] Similarly, India's 1,676 mm broad gauge diverges from neighbors like Iran's standard gauge, complicating potential Belt and Road Initiative corridors and forcing reliance on road or sea alternatives for seamless connectivity.[284] Interoperability challenges extend beyond physical gauge mismatches to compound effects on signaling, loading gauges, and axle loads, but gauge remains the primary barrier, as variable-gauge wheelsets—capable of shifting between 1,435 mm and 1,520 mm—suffer from mechanical complexity, higher maintenance demands, and speed restrictions above 160 km/h, limiting their adoption to low-volume freight routes.[285] Dual-gauge tracks, laying rails for two widths, mitigate some issues but double infrastructure costs and complicate maintenance, as seen in Australia's historical "gauge muddle" where breaks spurred localized employment booms (up to 50% population growth near junctions) yet entrenched national inefficiencies, with total system-wide losses exceeding benefits from fragmented specialization. In Europe, the Iberian gauge of 1,668 mm in Spain and Portugal hampers cross-border freight with France, prompting selective conversions of high-speed lines to 1,435 mm under EU Technical Specifications for Interoperability, though full network re-gauging remains prohibitive at estimated costs of €100-200 billion for Spain alone due to embedded infrastructure dependencies.[286] Standardization initiatives reflect causal trade-offs favoring network integration over sunk-cost preservation, as broader gauges offer marginal stability gains (reducing derailment risk by 5-10% on tight curves per engineering models) but interoperability penalties dominate in globalized supply chains.[287] Recent efforts include Finland's 2025 conversion from 1,524 mm to 1,435 mm, driven by NATO accession needs for rapid military mobility and EU alignment, potentially cutting cross-border transit times by 20-30% despite upfront expenses exceeding €1 billion for key lines.[288] In Asia, UNESCAP studies highlight axle-load harmonization alongside gauge unification as prerequisites for viable trans-continental rail, yet political inertia—evident in stalled Russia-China links—sustains fragmentation, underscoring how initial gauge selections, often arbitrary or empire-specific, yield path-dependent inefficiencies resistant to retroactive correction without coordinated investment.| Major Gauge (mm) | Primary Users | Share of Global Network (approx.) | Key Interoperability Issue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,435 | Europe (excl. Iberia), North America, China, Japan (Shinkansen) | 60% [279] | Baseline for most international standards |
| 1,520 | Russia, former USSR states | 15-20% [289] | Broad gauge break with EU/China borders |
| 1,668 | Spain, Portugal | <5% [289] | Limits EU high-speed integration |
| 1,676 | India, Pakistan, Argentina (partial) | 10% [290] | Colonial legacy hindering regional links |
| 1,000 (meter) | Parts of Africa, Southeast Asia, Latin America | 10-15% [290] | Prevalent in developing networks, upgrade costs high |
