Hubbry Logo
Iranian peoplesIranian peoplesMain
Open search
Iranian peoples
Community hub
Iranian peoples
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Iranian peoples
Iranian peoples
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Iranian peoples,[1] or Iranic peoples,[2] are a diverse ethnolinguistic group[3] who are identified chiefly by their native usage of any of the Iranian languages, which are a branch of the Indo-Iranian languages within the Indo-European language family.

The Proto-Iranians are believed to have emerged as a separate branch of the Indo-Iranians in Central Asia around the mid-2nd millennium BC.[4][5] At their peak of expansion in the mid-1st millennium BC, the territory of the Iranian peoples stretched across the entire Eurasian Steppe; from the Danubian Plains in the west to the Ordos Plateau in the east and the Iranian Plateau in the south.[6]

The ancient Iranian peoples who emerged after the 1st millennium BC include the Alans, the Bactrians, the Dahae, the Khwarazmians, the Massagetae, the Medes, the Parthians, the Persians, the Sagartians, the Saka, the Sarmatians, the Scythians, the Sogdians, and likely the Cimmerians, among other Iranian-speaking peoples of West Asia, Central Asia, Eastern Europe, and the Eastern Steppe.

In the 1st millennium AD, their area of settlement, which was mainly concentrated in the steppes and deserts of Eurasia,[7] was significantly reduced due to the expansion of the Slavic peoples, the Germanic peoples, the Turkic peoples, the Uralic peoples, the Mongolic peoples, and the Caucasian peoples; many were subjected to Slavicization[8][9][10][11] and Turkification.[12][13] Modern Iranian peoples include the Baloch, the Gilaks, the Jasz, the Kurds, the Lurs, the Mazanderanis, the Ossetians, the Pamiris, the Pashtuns, the Persians, the Tats, the Tajiks, the Talysh, the Wakhis, the Yaghnobis, and the Zazas. Their current distribution spreads across the Iranian Plateau – stretching from the Caucasus in the north to the Persian Gulf in the south and from eastern Anatolia in the west to western Xinjiang in the east – covering a region that is sometimes called Greater Iran, representing the extent of the Iranian-speaking peoples and the reach of their geopolitical and cultural influence.[14]

Name

[edit]

The term Iran derives directly from Middle Persian Ērān (𐭠𐭩𐭥𐭠𐭭) and Parthian Aryān (𐭀𐭓𐭉𐭀𐭍).[15] The Middle Iranian terms ērān and aryān are oblique plural forms of gentilic ēr- (in Middle Persian) and ary- (in Parthian), both deriving from Old Persian ariya- (𐎠𐎼𐎡𐎹), Avestan airiia- (𐬀𐬌𐬭𐬌𐬌𐬀) and Proto-Iranian *arya-.[15][16]

There have been many attempts to qualify the verbal root of ar- in Old Iranian arya-. The following are according to 1957 and later linguists:

  • Emmanuel Laroche (1957): ara- "to fit" ("fitting", "proper").
    Old Iranian arya- being descended from Proto-Indo-European *ar-yo-, meaning "(skillfully) assembler".[17]
  • Georges Dumézil (1958): ar- "to share" (as a union).
  • Harold Walter Bailey (1959): ar- "to beget" ("born", "nurturing").
  • Émil Benveniste (1969): ar- "to fit" ("companionable").

Unlike the Sanskrit ārya- (Aryan), the Old Iranian term has solely an ethnic meaning.[18][19] Today, the Old Iranian arya- remains in ethno-linguistic names such as Iran, Alan, Ir, and Iron.[20][15][21][22]

The Bistun Inscription of Darius the Great describes itself to have been composed in Arya [language or script].

In the Iranian languages, the gentilic is attested as a self-identifier included in ancient inscriptions and the literature of Avesta.[23][a] The earliest epigraphically attested reference to the word arya- occurs in the Bistun Inscription of the 6th century BC. The inscription of Bistun (or Behistun; Old Persian: Bagastana) describes itself to have been composed in Arya [language or script]. As is also the case for all other Old Iranian language usage, the arya of the inscription does not signify anything but Iranian.[24]

In royal Old Persian inscriptions, the term arya- appears in three different contexts:[19][20]

  • As the name of the language of the Old Persian version of the inscription of Darius I in the Bistun Inscription.
  • As the ethnic background of Darius the Great in inscriptions at Rustam Relief and Susa (Dna, Dse) and the ethnic background of Xerxes I in the inscription from Persepolis (Xph).
  • As the definition of the God of Iranians, Ohrmazd, in the Elamite version of the Bistun Inscription.

In the Dna and Dse, Darius and Xerxes describe themselves as "an Achaemenid, a Persian, son of a Persian, and an Aryan, of Aryan stock".[25] Although Darius the Great called his language arya- ("Iranian"),[25] modern scholars refer to it as Old Persian[25] because it is the ancestor of the modern Persian language.[26]

The trilingual inscription erected by the command of Shapur I gives a more clear description. The languages used are Parthian, Middle Persian, and Greek. In Greek inscription says "ego ... tou Arianon ethnous despotes eimi", which translates to "I am the king of the kingdom (nation) of the Iranians". In Middle Persian, Shapur says "ērānšahr xwadāy hēm" and in Parthian he says "aryānšahr xwadāy ahēm".[19][27]

The Avesta clearly uses airiia- as an ethnic name (Videvdat 1; Yasht 13.143–44, etc.), where it appears in expressions such as airyāfi daiŋˊhāvō ("Iranian lands"), airyō šayanəm ("land inhabited by Iranians"), and airyanəm vaējō vaŋhuyāfi dāityayāfi ("Iranian stretch of the good Dāityā").[19] In the late part of the Avesta (Videvdat 1), one of the mentioned homelands was referred to as Airyan'əm Vaējah which approximately means "expanse of the Iranians". The homeland varied in its geographic range, the area around Herat (Pliny's view) and even the entire expanse of the Iranian Plateau (Strabo's designation).[28]

The Old Persian and Avestan evidence is confirmed by the Greek sources.[19] Herodotus, in his Histories, remarks about the Iranian Medes that "Medes were called anciently by all people Arians" (7.62).[19][20] In Armenian sources, the Parthians, Medes and Persians are collectively referred to as Iranians.[29] Eudemus of Rhodes (Dubitationes et Solutiones de Primis Principiis, in Platonis Parmenidem) refers to "the Magi and all those of Iranian (áreion) lineage". Diodorus Siculus (1.94.2) considers Zoroaster (Zathraustēs) as one of the Arianoi.[19]

Strabo, in his Geographica (1st century AD), mentions of the Medes, Persians, Bactrians and Sogdians of the Iranian Plateau and Transoxiana of antiquity:[30]

The name of Ariana is further extended to a part of Persia and of Media, as also to the Bactrians and Sogdians on the north; for these speak approximately the same language, with but slight variations.

— Geographica, 15.8

The Bactrian (a Middle Iranian language) inscription of Kanishka (the founder of the Kushan Empire) at Rabatak, which was discovered in 1993 in an unexcavated site in the Afghan province of Baghlan, clearly refers to this Eastern Iranian language as Arya.[31]

All this evidence shows that the name Arya was a collective definition, denoting peoples who were aware of belonging to the one ethnic stock, speaking a common language, and having a religious tradition that centered on the cult of Ohrmazd.[19]

The academic usage of the term Iranian is distinct from the state of Iran and its various citizens (who are all Iranian by nationality), in the same way that the term Germanic peoples is distinct from Germans. Some inhabitants of Iran are not necessarily ethnic Iranians by virtue of not being speakers of Iranian languages.[citation needed]

Iranian vs. Iranic

[edit]

Some scholars such as John Perry prefer the term Iranic as the name for the linguistic family of this category (many of which are spoken outside Iran), while Iranian for anything about the country Iran. He uses the same analogue as in differentiating German from Germanic or differentiating Turkish and Turkic.[32] German scholar Martin Kümmel also argues for the same distinction of Iranian from Iranic.[33]

History and settlement

[edit]

Indo-European roots

[edit]
Early Indo-European migrations from the Pontic–Caspian steppe and across Central Asia.

Proto-Indo-Iranians

[edit]
Archaeological cultures associated with Indo-Iranian migrations (after EIEC). The Andronovo, BMAC and Yaz cultures have often been associated with it. The GGC (Swat), Cemetery H, Copper Hoard and PGW cultures are candidates for the same associations.

The Proto-Indo-Iranians are commonly identified with the Sintashta culture and the subsequent Andronovo culture within the broader Andronovo horizon, and their homeland with an area of the Eurasian steppe that borders the Ural River on the west and the Tian Shan on the east.

The Indo-Iranian migrations took place in two waves.[34][35] The first wave consisted of the Indo-Aryan migration through the Bactria-Margiana Culture, also called "Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex", into the Levant, founding the Mitanni kingdom; and a migration south-eastward of the Vedic people, over the Hindu Kush into northern India.[36] The Indo-Aryans split off around 1800–1600 BC from the Iranians,[37] whereafter they were defeated and split into two groups by the Iranians,[38] who dominated the Central Eurasian steppe zone[39] and "chased [the Indo-Aryans] to the extremities of Central Eurasia".[39] One group were the Indo-Aryans who founded the Mitanni kingdom in northern Syria;[40] (c. 1500 – c. 1300 BC) the other group were the Vedic people.[41] Christopher I. Beckwith suggests that the Wusun, an Indo-European Caucasian people of Inner Asia in antiquity, were also of Indo-Aryan origin.[42]

The second wave is interpreted as the Iranian wave,[43] and took place in the third stage of the Indo-European migrations[36] from 800 BC onwards.

Sintashta–Petrovka culture

[edit]
According to Allentoft (2015), the Sintashta culture probably derived from the Corded Ware culture.

The Sintashta culture, also known as the Sintashta–Petrovka culture[44] or Sintashta–Arkaim culture,[45] is a Bronze Age archaeological culture of the northern Eurasian steppe on the borders of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, dated to the period 2100–1800 BC.[46] It is probably the archaeological manifestation of the Indo-Iranian language group.[47]

The Sintashta culture emerged from the interaction of two antecedent cultures. Its immediate predecessor in the Ural-Tobol steppe was the Poltavka culture, an offshoot of the cattle-herding Yamnaya horizon that moved east into the region between 2800 and 2600 BC. Several Sintashta towns were built over older Poltavka settlements or close to Poltavka cemeteries, and Poltavka motifs are common on Sintashta pottery. Sintashta material culture also shows the influence of the late Abashevo culture, a collection of Corded Ware settlements in the forest steppe zone north of the Sintashta region that were also predominantly pastoralist.[48] Allentoft et al. (2015) also found close autosomal genetic relationship between peoples of Corded Ware culture and Sintashta culture.[49]

The earliest known chariots have been found in Sintashta burials, and the culture is considered a strong candidate for the origin of the technology, which spread throughout the Old World and played an important role in ancient warfare.[50] Sintashta settlements are also remarkable for the intensity of copper mining and bronze metallurgy carried out there, which is unusual for a steppe culture.[51]

Because of the difficulty of identifying the remains of Sintashta sites beneath those of later settlements, the culture was only recently distinguished from the Andronovo culture.[45] It is now recognised as a separate entity forming part of the 'Andronovo horizon'.[44]

Andronovo culture

[edit]
The Andronovo culture's approximate maximal extent, with the formative Sintashta-Petrovka culture (red), the location of the earliest spoke-wheeled chariot finds (purple), and the adjacent and overlapping Afanasevo, Srubna, and BMAC cultures (green).

The Andronovo culture is a collection of similar local Bronze Age Indo-Iranian cultures that flourished c. 1800–900 BC in western Siberia and the west Asiatic steppe.[52] It is probably better termed an archaeological complex or archaeological horizon. The name derives from the village of Andronovo (55°53′N 55°42′E / 55.883°N 55.700°E / 55.883; 55.700), where in 1914, several graves were discovered, with skeletons in crouched positions, buried with richly decorated pottery. The older Sintashta culture (2100–1800), formerly included within the Andronovo culture, is now considered separately, but regarded as its predecessor, and accepted as part of the wider Andronovo horizon. At least four sub-cultures of the Andronovo horizon have been distinguished, during which the culture expands towards the south and the east:

The geographical extent of the culture is vast and difficult to delineate exactly. On its western fringes, it overlaps with the approximately contemporaneous, but distinct, Srubna culture in the Volga-Ural interfluvial. To the east, it reaches into the Minusinsk depression, with some sites as far west as the southern Ural Mountains,[54] overlapping with the area of the earlier Afanasevo culture.[55] Additional sites are scattered as far south as the Koppet Dag (Turkmenistan), the Pamir (Tajikistan) and the Tian Shan (Kyrgyzstan). The northern boundary vaguely corresponds to the beginning of the Taiga.[54] In the Volga basin, interaction with the Srubna culture was the most intense and prolonged, and Federovo style pottery is found as far west as Volgograd.

Most researchers associate the Andronovo horizon with early Indo-Iranian languages, though it may have overlapped the early Uralic-speaking area at its northern fringe.

The archeological features of the Yaz I culture are seen as the results of the intrusion of nomadic Indo-Iranians from the northern Andronovo culture and their interaction with indigenous traditions from the preceding BMAC culture.[56]

Scythians and Persians

[edit]
Saka horseman, Pazyryk, from a carpet, c. 300 BC

From the late 2nd millennium BC to early 1st millennium BC the Iranians had expanded from the Eurasian Steppe, and Iranian peoples such as Medes, Persians, Parthians and Bactrians populated the Iranian Plateau.[57]

Scythian tribes, along with Cimmerians, Sarmatians and Alans populated the steppes north of the Black Sea. The Scythian and Sarmatian tribes were spread across Great Hungarian Plain, South-Eastern Ukraine, Russias Siberian, Southern, Volga,[58] Uralic regions and the Balkans,[59][60][61] while other Scythian tribes, such as the Saka, spread as far east as Xinjiang, China.

Western and Eastern Iranians

[edit]

The division into an "Eastern" and a "Western" group by the early 1st millennium is visible in Avestan vs. Old Persian, the two oldest known Iranian languages.[citation needed] The Old Avestan texts known as the Gathas are believed to have been composed by Zoroaster, the founder of Zoroastrianism, with the Yaz culture (c. 1500 BC – 1100 BC) as a candidate for the development of Eastern Iranian culture.[62]

Western Iranian peoples

[edit]
Distribution of Iranic peoples during the Iron Age
Achaemenid Empire at its greatest extent under the rule of Darius I (522–486 BC)
Persepolis: Persian guards

During the 1st centuries of the 1st millennium BC, the ancient Persians established themselves in the western portion of the Iranian Plateau and appear to have interacted considerably with the Elamites and Babylonians, while the Medes also entered in contact with the Assyrians.[63] Remnants of the Median language and Old Persian show their common Proto-Iranian roots, emphasized in Strabo and Herodotus' description of their languages as very similar to the languages spoken by the Bactrians and Sogdians in the east.[28][64] Following the establishment of the Achaemenid Empire, the Persian language (referred to as "Farsi" in Persian after being changed from Parsi) spread from Pars or Fars province (Persia) to various regions of the Empire, with the modern dialects of Iran, Afghanistan (also known as Dari) and Central-Asia (known as Tajiki) descending from Old Persian.

At first, the Western Iranian peoples in the Near East were dominated by the various Assyrian empires. An alliance of the Medes with the Persians, and rebelling Babylonians, Scythians, Chaldeans, and Cimmerians, helped the Medes to capture Nineveh in 612 BC, which resulted in the eventual collapse of the Neo-Assyrian Empire by 605 BC.[65] The Medes were subsequently able to establish their Median kingdom (with Ecbatana as their royal centre) beyond their original homeland and had eventually a territory stretching roughly from northeastern Iran to the Halys River in Anatolia. After the fall of the Assyrian Empire, between 616 BC and 605 BC, a unified Median state was formed, which, together with Babylonia, Lydia, and Egypt, became one of the four major powers of the ancient Near East

Later on, in 550 BC, Cyrus the Great, would overthrow the leading Median rule, and conquer Kingdom of Lydia and the Babylonian Empire after which he established the Achaemenid Empire (or the First Persian Empire), while his successors would dramatically extend its borders. At its greatest extent, the Achaemenid Empire would encompass swaths of territory across three continents, namely Europe, Africa and Asia, stretching from the Balkans and Eastern Europe proper in the west, to the Indus Valley in the east. The largest empire of ancient history, with their base in Persis (although the main capital was located in Babylon) the Achaemenids would rule much of the known ancient world for centuries. This First Persian Empire was equally notable for its successful model of a centralised, bureaucratic administration (through satraps under a king) and a government working to the profit of its subjects, for building infrastructure such as a postal system and road systems and the use of an official language across its territories and a large professional army and civil services (inspiring similar systems in later empires),[66] and for emancipation of slaves including the Jewish exiles in Babylon, and is noted in Western history as the antagonist of the Greek city states during the Greco-Persian Wars. The Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, was built in the empire as well.

The Greco-Persian Wars resulted in the Persians being forced to withdraw from their European territories, setting the direct further course of history of Greece and the rest of Europe. More than a century later, a prince of Macedon (which itself was a subject to Persia from the late 6th century BC up to the First Persian invasion of Greece) later known by the name of Alexander the Great, overthrew the incumbent Persian king, by which the Achaemenid Empire was ended.

Old Persian is attested in the Behistun Inscription (c. 519 BC), recording a proclamation by Darius the Great.[67] In southwestern Iran, the Achaemenid kings usually wrote their inscriptions in trilingual form (Elamite, Babylonian and Old Persian)[68] while elsewhere other languages were used. The administrative languages were Elamite in the early period, and later Imperial Aramaic,[69] as well as Greek, making it a widely used bureaucratic language.[70] Even though the Achaemenids had extensive contacts with the Greeks and vice versa, and had conquered many of the Greek-speaking area's both in Europe and Asia Minor during different periods of the empire, the native Old Iranian sources provide no indication of Greek linguistic evidence.[70] However, there is plenty of evidence (in addition to the accounts of Herodotus) that Greeks, apart from being deployed and employed in the core regions of the empire, also evidently lived and worked in the heartland of the Achaemenid Empire, namely Iran.[70] For example, Greeks were part of the various ethnicities that constructed Darius' palace in Susa, apart from the Greek inscriptions found nearby there, and one short Persepolis tablet written in Greek.[70]

The early inhabitants of the Achaemenid Empire appear to have adopted the religion of Zoroastrianism.[71] The Baloch who speak a west Iranian language relate an oral tradition regarding their migration from Aleppo, Syria around the year 1000 AD, whereas linguistic evidence links Balochi to Kurmanji, Soranî, Gorani and Zazaki language.[72]

Eastern Iranian peoples

[edit]
The Eastern Iranic and Balto-Slavic dialect continuums in Eastern Europe, the latter with proposed material cultures correlating to speakers of Balto-Slavic in the Bronze Age (white). Red dots = archaic Slavic hydronyms
Archaeological cultures c. 750 BC at the start of Eastern-Central Europe's Iron Age; the Proto-Scythian culture borders the Balto-Slavic cultures (Lusatian, Milograd and Chernoles)
Silver coin of the Indo-Scythian king Azes II (reigned c. 35–12 BC). Buddhist triratna symbol in the left field on the reverse

While the Iranian tribes of the south are better known through their texts and modern counterparts, the tribes which remained largely in the vast Eurasian expanse are known through the references made to them by the ancient Greeks, Persians, Chinese, and Indo-Aryans as well as by archaeological finds. The Greek chronicler, Herodotus (5th century BC) makes references to a nomadic people, the Scythians; he describes them as having dwelt in what is today southern European Russia and Ukraine. He was the first to make a reference to them. Many ancient Sanskrit texts from a later period make references to such tribes they were witness of pointing them towards the southeasternmost edges of Central Asia, around the Hindukush range in northern Pakistan.

It is believed that these Scythians were conquered by their eastern cousins, the Sarmatians, who are mentioned by Strabo as the dominant tribe which controlled the southern Russian steppe in the 1st millennium AD. These Sarmatians were also known to the Romans, who conquered the western tribes in the Balkans and sent Sarmatian conscripts, as part of Roman legions, as far west as Roman Britain. These Iranian-speaking Scythians and Sarmatians dominated large parts of Eastern Europe for a millennium, and were eventually absorbed and assimilated (e.g. Slavicisation) by the Proto-Slavic population of the region.[8][9][11]

The Sarmatians differed from the Scythians in their veneration of the god of fire rather than god of nature, and women's prominent role in warfare, which possibly served as the inspiration for the Amazons.[73][74] At their greatest reported extent, around the 1st century AD, these tribes ranged from the Vistula River to the mouth of the Danube and eastward to the Volga, bordering the shores of the Black and Caspian Seas as well as the Caucasus to the south.[b] Their territory, which was known as Sarmatia to Greco-Roman ethnographers, corresponded to the western part of greater Scythia (mostly modern Ukraine and Southern Russia, also to a smaller extent north eastern Balkans around Moldova). According to authors Arrowsmith, Fellowes and Graves Hansard in their book A Grammar of Ancient Geography published in 1832, Sarmatia had two parts, Sarmatia Europea[75] and Sarmatia Asiatica[76] covering a combined area of 503,000 sq mi or 1,302,764 km2.

Throughout the 1st millennium AD, the large presence of the Sarmatians who once dominated Ukraine, Southern Russia, and swaths of the Carpathians, gradually started to diminish mainly due to assimilation and absorption by the Germanic Goths, especially from the areas near the Roman frontier, but only completely by the Proto-Slavic peoples. The abundant East Iranian-derived toponyms in Eastern Europe proper (e.g. some of the largest rivers; the Dniestr and Dniepr), as well as loanwords adopted predominantly through the Eastern Slavic languages and adopted aspects of Iranian culture amongst the early Slavs, are all a remnant of this. A connection between Proto-Slavonic and Iranian languages is also furthermore proven by the earliest layer of loanwords in the former.[77] For instance, the Proto-Slavonic words for god (*bogъ), demon (*divъ), house (*xata), axe (*toporъ) and dog (*sobaka) are of Scythian origin.[78]

The extensive contact between these Scytho-Sarmatian Iranian tribes in Eastern Europe and the (Early) Slavs included religion. After Slavic and Baltic languages diverged the Early Slavs interacted with Iranian peoples and merged elements of Iranian spirituality into their beliefs. For example, both Early Iranian and Slavic supreme gods were considered givers of wealth, unlike the supreme thunder gods in many other European religions. Also, both Slavs and Iranians had demons –- given names from similar linguistic roots, Daêva (Iranian) and Divŭ (Slavic) –- and a concept of dualism, of good and evil.[79]

The Sarmatians of the east, based in the Pontic–Caspian steppe, became the Alans, who also ventured far and wide, with a branch ending up in Western Europe and then North Africa, as they accompanied the Germanic Vandals and Suebi during their migrations. The modern Ossetians are believed to be the direct descendants of the Alans, as other remnants of the Alans disappeared following Germanic, Hunnic and ultimately Slavic migrations and invasions.[80] Another group of Alans allied with Goths to defeat the Romans and ultimately settled in what is now called Catalonia (Goth-Alania).[81]

Hormizd I, Sassanian coin

Some of the Saka-Scythian tribes in Central Asia would later move further southeast and invade the Iranian Plateau, large sections of present-day Afghanistan and finally deep into present day Pakistan (see Indo-Scythians). Another Iranian tribe related to the Saka-Scythians were the Parni in Central Asia, and who later become indistinguishable from the Parthians, speakers of a northwest-Iranian language. Many Iranian tribes, including the Khwarazmians, Massagetae and Sogdians, were assimilated and/or displaced in Central Asia by the migrations of Turkic tribes emanating out of Xinjiang and Siberia.[82]

The modern Sarikoli in southern Xinjiang and the Ossetians of the Caucasus (mainly South Ossetia and North Ossetia) are remnants of the various Scythian-derived tribes from the vast far and wide territory they once dwelled in. The modern Ossetians are the descendants of the Alano-Sarmatians,[83][84] and their claims are supported by their Northeast Iranian language, while culturally the Ossetians resemble their North Caucasian neighbors, the Kabardians and Circassians.[80][85] Various extinct Iranian peoples existed in the eastern Caucasus, including the Azaris, while some Iranian peoples remain in the region, including the Talysh[86] and the Tats[87] found in Azerbaijan and as far north as the Russian republic of Dagestan. A remnant of the Sogdians is found in the Yaghnobi-speaking population in parts of the Zeravshan valley in Tajikistan.

Later developments

[edit]

The main migration of Turkic peoples occurred between the 6th and 10th centuries, when they spread across most of Central Asia. The Turkic peoples slowly replaced and assimilated the previous Iranian-speaking locals, turning the population of Central Asia from being largely Iranian into being primarily of East Asian descent.[88]

Starting with the reign of Omar in 634 AD, Muslim Arabs began a conquest of the Iranian Plateau. The Arabs conquered the Sassanid Empire of the Persians and seized much of the Byzantine Empire populated by the Kurds and others. Ultimately, the various Iranian peoples, including the Persians, Pashtuns, Kurds and Balochis, converted to Islam, while the Alans converted to Christianity, thus laying the foundation for the fact that the modern-day Ossetians are Christian.[89][page needed] The Iranian peoples would later split along sectarian lines as the Persians adopted the Shi'a sect. As ancient tribes and identities changed, so did the Iranian peoples, many of whom assimilated foreign cultures and peoples.[90]

Later, during the 2nd millennium AD, the Iranian peoples would play a prominent role during the age of Islamic expansion and empire. Saladin, a noted adversary of the Crusaders, was an ethnic Kurd, while various empires centered in Iran (including the Safavids) re-established a modern dialect of Persian as the official language spoken throughout much of what is today Iran and the Caucasus. Iranian influence was also an principal factor in the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Turks integrated Persian into their court, governance, and daily life. Supported by the sultans, nobility, and spiritual leaders, Persian was promoted as a second language, intertwining with Turkish and greatly influencing Ottoman cultural traditions.[91] However, a heavy Turko-Persian basis in Anatolia was set already by the predecessors of the Ottomans, namely the Sultanate of Rum and Anatolian Beyliks amongst others) as well to the court of the Mughal Empire. All of the major Iranian peoples reasserted their use of Iranian languages following the decline of Arab rule, but would not begin to form modern national identities until the 19th and early 20th centuries.[citation needed]

Persian nationalism

[edit]
Geographic distribution of modern Iranian languages

The term "Persian" (Arabic: فُرس, romanizedFurs, Persian: فارس, romanizedFars) is more often used in English partly due to the fact that "Iran" was known in the western world as "Persia". In 1959, the government of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Reza Shah's son, announced that both "Persia" and "Iran" could officially be used interchangeably.[92] Nowadays, the term "Persians" mainly refers to those whose mother tongue is Persian (Farsi) and those who identify as Persian.[93] However, Iran is a mosaic of ethnic and linguistic groups.[93] Persians are said to make up roughly half the population (with some estimates reaching 60%), while the rest comprises Azeris, Arabs (e.g. Khuzestani Arabs), Balochis, Kurds, Gilanis, Mazanderanis, Loris, Qashqais, Bakhtiaris, Armenians, and others.[93] Although many of these groups speak Persian (Farsi) and identify as Iranian, their ethnic identity is distinct from being Persian. Additionally, Iran is home to various religious minorities—Sunni Muslims, Christians, Jews, Bahá’ís, Zoroastrians, and others—some of whom identify as Persian while others do not.[93] The denial of this diversity stems not only from ignorance but also from Persian-centric nationalism rooted in mid-20th century Iranian state policies. This approach, particularly under the Pahlavi regime, sought to erase ethnic and linguistic diversity in favour of an exclusivist Persian identity.[93]

Inspired by European and Turkish nationalist ideologies, Reza Shah Pahlavi's regime crafted an artificial narrative of Iranian history centered on Persian ethnic unity over 2,500 years.[93] This contradicted the historical reality, as previous Iranian dynasties, such as the Qajars and Safavids, were of Azeri Turkish origin, and the Persian Empire itself historically united diverse peoples through imperial administration and Persian as a lingua franca rather than ethnicity.[93] This nationalistic approach extended as far as to the Gulf Arab states where the Iranian migrants lived; as such, anything that happened in Iran that was annoying to these countries, the pressure was immediately put on Iranians living in Bahrain, in Kuwait, or the rest of the Gulf in general.[94]: 44–45  Reza Shah's policies were mainly influenced by Aryanism, a colonial-era ideology linking language with ethnicity.[93] This framework, which tied the Indo-European language family to an imagined migration of an Aryan nation, shaped nationalist projects in Europe and Iran.[93] Aryanism conveniently justified European colonial views of Indian and Persian civilizations while influencing Iranian nationalism to adopt an exclusionary identity framework.[93] Author Mehran Kokherdi [Author of "History of South Fars"] states that the term Persians is used to refer to all groups with original Parsi roots, including the inhabitants of villages scattered across Persia who still speak their ancient Parsi language. However, the term has also come to describe the populations of major cities (e.g. Tehran, Shiraz, Isfahan) more broadly, who consist of a blend of various ethnic groups, all unified by their use of Modern Persian—a language that incorporates elements from Arabic, Turkish, French, Russian, Mongolian, and Parsi. Based on their shared language, the people of Iran generally identify them as Persians.[95]: 3–4  This leads many scholars to believe that the term "Iranian" is more encompassing and inclusive of these various ethnic groups (Iranic people, and ethnic groups in Iran).[96] It's worth noting that many groups such as the Kurds, do not refer to themselves as such (Persian), despite their Iranic/Iranian roots.

Demographics

[edit]

There are an estimated 150 to 200 million native speakers of Iranian languages, the six major groups of Persians, Lurs, Kurds, Tajiks, Baloch, and Pashtuns accounting for about 90% of this number.[97] Currently, most of these Iranian peoples live in Iran, Afghanistan, the Caucasus (mainly Ossetia, other parts of Georgia, Dagestan, and Azerbaijan), Iraqi Kurdistan and Kurdish majority populated areas of Turkey, Iran and Syria, Tajikistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan. There are also Iranian peoples living in Eastern Arabia such as northern Oman, Bahrain, and Kuwait.

Due to recent migrations, there are also large communities of speakers of Iranian languages in Europe and the Americas.

List of Iranian peoples with the respective groups' core areas of settlements and their estimated sizes
Ethnicity Origins (Greater Iran) Language Region Population
Achumis (Irahistanis/Laristanis/Garmsiris/Khodmoonis) Western Iranic, Persian tribe (Ira and Utians) Achomi/Lari/Khodmooni, a Branch of Southwestern, Middle Iranian, Middle Persian (Parsig), in addition to Farsi (Iran), and Arabic (Gulf) Primarily Southwestern Iran (Irahistan, Larestan region).

Notable presence in Shiraz[98] and GCC Arab Gulf states Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, Oman.[99]

0.5–1,000,000[100][101][102]
Basseri Western Iranic, Persian tribe (Pasargadean) Basseri Southwestern Iran, Fars Province, Shiraz 72,000[citation needed]
Gilakis, Mazanderanis

And Semnani people

Western Iranic, Possibly Medes / Parthians Gilaki, Mazandrani, Branches of Northwestern Median/Parthian... Northwestern Iran 5–10,000,000[citation needed]
Kurds; Zaza,[103][104] Yazidis, Shabaks Western Iranic, Medes Kurdish, Northwestern Historical Homeland: Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Syria ( Kurdistan region)

Notable presence in: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kuwait,[citation needed] and United Kingdom.[105][106]

30–40,000,000[107]
Feyli Kurds / Feyli Lurs[c][108] Western Iranic, possibly Medes / Parthians Feyli or Ilami Iran, Iraq 1,500,000[citation needed]
Lurs Western Iranic, Ellamites, Kassites, Gautians, and possibly Persians Luri, a branch of Southwestern Middle Persian with close kinship to New Persian Historical Homeland: Iran, Lorestan region.

Notable presence in: Kuwait, Oman[109], Bahrain (Bakhtiaris),[110]: 42  and United Kingdom.[citation needed]

026
6,000,000[citation needed]
Iranian Azeris Western Iranic, possibly Medes / Parthians Old Azeri (extinct), Talyshi, Tati Azerbaijan, Iran 1.5,000,000[citation needed]
Baluchs Western Iranic, possibly Medes / Parthians (?) Balochi Historial Homeland: Iran & Pakistan ( Balochistan region)

Notable presence in: Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, UAE,[111] Bahrain,[111] Kuwait,[111] Oman.[111][112]

15
20–22,000,000[citation needed][113]
Sistanis ? Sistani northern parts of Sistan and Balouchistan province Iran ?
Tajiks Eastern Iranic, Sogdians and the Bactrians.[114] Farsi aka New Persian (Dari, & Tajiki) Afghanistan, Tajikistan 8-15,000,000 (2024)[citation needed]
Persians Persian language Iran 51,940,000
Yaghnobi Eastern Iranic, Sogdian[115] Yaghnobi language, a descendant of Eastern Iranic Sogdian language Uzbekistan and Tajikistan (Zerafshan region) 25,000[citation needed]
Pashtuns Eastern Iranic, Various groups Pashto Afghanistan, Pakistan 60-70,000,000 [citation needed]
Pamiris Eastern Iranic, Saka (Scythian), Tocharian, Dardic tribes, as well as pre-Indo-European groups. Pamir languages Tajikistan, Afghanistan, China (Xinjiang), Pakistan 300,000–350,000[citation needed]
Ossetians Eastern Iranic, Iazyges tribe of the Sarmatians, an Alanic sub-tribe, which split off from Scythians.[116] Ossetian language Georgia (South Ossetia), Russia (North Ossetia), Hungary 700,000[citation needed]
Zoroastrian groups in South Asia Western Iranic? Persian tribes? Avestan (liturgical language), Zoroastrian Dari (Iranis) India, Pakistan 202,604 ~[citation needed]
Dehwar ? Farsi with a dialect known as Dehwari Iran & Pakistan ( Balochistan region) ?
Farsiwan ? Farsi with a Kabuli, Khorasani dialect Afghanistan ?
Kumzari ? Kumzari language Oman (Musandam) 5,500 ~[citation needed]

Culture

[edit]
Nowruz, an ancient Iranian annual festival that is still widely celebrated throughout the Iranian Plateau and beyond, in Dushanbe, Tajikistan.

Iranian culture is today considered to be centered in what is called the Iranian Plateau, and has its origins tracing back to the Andronovo culture of the late Bronze Age, which is associated with other cultures of the Eurasian Steppe.[117][118] It was, however, later developed distinguishably from its earlier generations in the Steppe, where a large number of Iranian-speaking peoples (i.e., the Scythians) continued to participate, resulting in a differentiation that is displayed in Iranian mythology as the contrast between Iran and Turan.[117]

Like other Indo-Europeans, the early Iranians practiced ritual sacrifice, had a social hierarchy consisting of warriors, clerics, and farmers, and recounted their deeds through poetic hymns and sagas.[119] Various common traits can be discerned among the Iranian peoples. For instance, the social event of Nowruz is an ancient Iranian festival that is still celebrated by nearly all of the Iranian peoples. However, due to their different environmental adaptations through migration, the Iranian peoples embrace some degrees of diversity in dialect, social system, and other aspects of culture.[1]

With numerous artistic, scientific, architectural, and philosophical achievements and numerous kingdoms and empires that bridged much of the civilized world in antiquity, the Iranian peoples were often in close contact with people from various western and eastern parts of the world.

Religion

[edit]
The ruins at Kangavar, Iran, presumed to belong to a temple dedicated to the ancient goddess Anahita.[120]

The early Iranian peoples practiced the ancient Iranian religion, which, like that of other Indo-European peoples, embraced various male and female deities.[121] Fire was regarded as an important and highly sacred element, and also a deity. In ancient Iran, fire was kept with great care in fire temples.[121] Various annual festivals that were mainly related to agriculture and herding were celebrated, the most important of which was the New Year (Nowruz), which is still widely celebrated.[121] Zoroastrianism, a form of the ancient Iranian religion that is still practiced by some communities,[122] was later developed and spread to nearly all of the Iranian peoples living in the Iranian Plateau. Other religions that had their origins in the Iranian world were Mithraism, Manichaeism, and Mazdakism, among others. The various religions of the Iranian peoples are believed by some scholars to have been significant early philosophical influences on Christianity and Judaism.[123]

Nowadays, most Iranian people follow Islam (Sunnism, followed by Shi'ism), with minorities following Christianity, Judaism, Mandaeism, Iranian religions and various levels of irreligion.[citation needed]

Cultural assimilation

[edit]
Bronze Statue of a Parthian nobleman, National Museum of Iran
A caftan worn by a Sogdian horseman, 8th–10th century

Iranian languages were and, to a lesser extent, still are spoken in a wide area comprising regions around the Black Sea, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Russia and the northwest of China.[124] This population was linguistically assimilated by smaller but dominant Turkic-speaking groups, while the sedentary population eventually adopted the Persian language, which began to spread within the region since the time of the Sasanian Empire.[124] The language-shift from Middle Iranian to Turkic and New Persian was predominantly the result of an "elite dominance" process.[125][126] Moreover, various Turkic-speaking ethnic groups of the Iranian Plateau are often conversant also in an Iranian language and embrace Iranian culture to the extent that the term Turko-Iranian would be applied.[127] A number of Iranian peoples were also intermixed with the Slavs,[9] and many were subjected to Slavicisation.[10][11]

The following either partially descend from or are sometimes regarded as descendants of the Iranian peoples.

    • Azerbaijanis: In spite of being native speakers of a Turkic language (Azerbaijani Turkic), they are believed to be primarily descended from the earlier Iranian-speakers of the region.[1][117][128][129][130] They are possibly related to the ancient Iranian tribe of the Medes, aside from the rise of the subsequent Persian and Turkic elements (changing of the native Iranian language) within their area of settlement,[131] which, prior to the spread of Turkic, was Iranian-speaking.[132] Thus, due to their historical, genetic and cultural ties to the Iranians,[133] the Azerbaijanis are often associated with the Iranian peoples. Genetic studies observed that they are also genetically related to the Iranian peoples.[134]
    • Turkmens: Genetic studies show that the Turkmens are characterized by the presence of local Iranian mtDNA lineages, similar to the eastern Iranian populations, but modest female Mongoloid mtDNA components were observed in Turkmen populations with the frequencies of about 20%.[135]
    • Uzbeks: The unique grammatical and phonetical features of the Uzbek language,[136] as well as elements within the modern Uzbek culture, reflect the older Iranian roots of the Uzbek people.[124][137][138][139] According to recent genetic genealogy testing from a University of Oxford study, the genetic admixture of the Uzbeks clusters somewhere between the Iranian peoples and the Mongols.[140] Prior to the Russian conquest of Central Asia, the local ancestors of the Turkic-speaking Uzbeks and the Persian-speaking Tajiks, both living in Central Asia, were referred to as Sarts, while Uzbek and Turk were the names given to the nomadic and semi-nomadic populations of the area. Still, as of today, modern Uzbeks and Tajiks are known to their Turkic neighbors, the Kazakhs and the Kyrgyz, as Sarts. Some Uzbek scholars also favor the Iranian origin theory.[141][page needed] However, another study, conducted in 2009, claims that Uzbeks and Central Asian Turkic peoples cluster genetically and are far from Iranian groups.[142]
    • Uyghurs: Contemporary scholars consider modern Uyghurs to be the descendants of, apart from the ancient Uyghurs, the Iranian Saka (Scythian) tribes and other Indo-European peoples who inhabited the Tarim Basin before the arrival of the Turkic tribes.[143]
  • Persian-speakers:
    • The Hazaras are a Persian-speaking ethnic group native to, and primarily residing in, the mountainous region of Hazarajat, in central Afghanistan. Although the origins of the Hazara people have not been fully reconstructed, genetic analysis of the Hazara indicate partial Mongol ancestry. Mongol and Turkic invaders (Turco-Mongols) mixed with the local indigenous Turkic and Iranian populations; for example, Qara'unas settled in what is now Afghanistan and mixed with the local populations. A second wave of mostly Chagatai Turco-Mongols came from Central Asia, associated with the Ilkhanate and the Timurids, all of whom settled in Hazarajat and mixed with the local populations. Phenotype can vary, with some noting that certain Hazaras may resemble peoples native to the Iranian plateau.[144][145]
  • Slavic-speakers:
    • Croats and Serbs: Some scholars suggest that the Slavic-speaking Serbs and Croats are descended from the ancient Sarmatians,[146][147] an ancient Iranian people who once settled in most of southern European Russia and the eastern Balkans, and that their ethnonyms are of Iranian origin. It is proposed that the Sarmatian Serboi and alleged Horoathos tribes were assimilated with the numerically superior Slavs, passing on their name. Iranian-speaking peoples did inhabit parts of the Balkans in late classical times, and would have been encountered by the Slavs. An archaeogenetic IBD study found that the Slavs make a specific and recognisable genetic cluster which "was formed by admixture of a Baltic-related group with East Germanic people and Sarmatians or Scythians".[148] Although previous direct linguistic, historical, or archaeological proof for such a theory is lacking.[d]
  • Swahili-speakers:
  • Indo-Aryan speakers:

Genetics

[edit]
Population genomic PCA, showing the CIC (Central Iranian cluster) among other worldwide samples.

Recent population genomic studies found that the genetic structure of Iranian peoples formed already about 5,000 years ago and show high continuity since then, suggesting that they were largely unaffected by migration events from outside groups. Genetically speaking, Iranian peoples generally cluster closely with European and other Middle Eastern peoples. Analyzed samples of Iranian Persians, Kurds, Azeris, Lurs, Mazanderanis, Gilaks and Arabs cluster tightly together, forming a single cluster known as the CIC (Central Iranian cluster). Compared with worldwide populations, Iranians (CIC) cluster in the center of the wider West-Eurasian cluster, close to Europeans, Middle Easterners, and South-Central Asians. Iranian Arabs and Azeris genetically overlap with Iranian peoples. The genetic substructure of Iranians is low and homogeneous, compared with other "1000G" populations. Europeans, and certain South Asians (specifically the Parsi minority) showed the highest affinity with Iranians, while Sub-Saharan Africans and East Asians showed the highest differentiation with Iranians.[155]

The BMAC population largely derived from preceding local Copper Age peoples who were in turn related to Neolithic farmers from the Iranian plateau and to a lesser extent early Anatolian farmers, as well as West Siberian hunter-gatherers. The samples extracted from the BMAC sites did not have derived any part of their ancestry from the Yamnaya people, who are associated with Proto-Indo-Europeans, although some peripheral samples did already carry significant Yamnaya-like Western Steppe Herders ancestry, inline with the southwards expansion of Western Steppe Herders from the Sintashta and Andronovo cultures towards Southern Central Asia at c. 2100 BCE.[156]

The Yaz I culture of Margiana, Bactria and Sogdia was characterised by a combination of BMAC and Andronovo ancestries.[56] Likewise, a 2022 study also shows that the ancestry of modern Tajiks and Yaghnobis largely formed during the early Iron Age by a mixture between these two groups.[157]

Tajik people from Afghanistan
Tat men from the village of Adur in the Kuba Uyezd of the Baku Governorate of the Russian Empire

Paternal haplogroups

[edit]

Regueiro et al (2006)[158] and Grugni et al (2012)[159] have performed large-scale sampling of Y chromosome haplogroups of different ethnic groups within Iran. They found that the most common paternal haplogroups were:

Kurdish people celebrating Nowruz, Tangi Sar village.
  • J1-M267; commonly found among Semitic-speaking people, was rarely over 10% in Iranian groups.
  • J2-M172: is the most common Hg in Iran (~23%); almost exclusively represented by J2a-M410 subclade (93%), the other major sub-clade being J2b-M12. Apart from Iranians, J2 is common in northern Arabs, Mediterranean and Balkan peoples (Croats, Serbs, Greeks, Bosniaks, Albanians, Italians, Macedonians, Bulgarians, Turks), in the Caucasus (Armenians, Georgians, Chechens, Ingush, northeastern Turkey, north/northwestern Iran, Kurds, Persians); whilst its frequency drops suddenly beyond Afghanistan, Pakistan and northern India.[160] In Europe, J2a is more common in southern Greece and southern Italy; whilst J2b (J2-M12) is more common in Thessaly, Macedonia and central – northern Italy. Thus J2a and its subgroups within it have a wide distribution from Italy to India, whilst J2b is mostly confined to the Balkans and Italy,[161] being rare even in Turkey. Whilst closely linked with Anatolia and the Levant; and putative agricultural expansions, the distribution of the various sub-clades of J2 likely represents a number of migrational histories which require further elucidation.[160][162]
  • R1a-M198: is common in Iran, more so in the east and south rather than the west and north; suggesting a migration toward the south to India then a secondary westward spread across Iran.[163] Whilst the Grongi and Regueiro studies did not define exactly which sub-clades Iranian R1a haplogrouops belong to, private genealogy tests suggest that they virtually all belong to "Eurasian" R1a-Z93.[164] Indeed, population studies of neighbouring Indian groups found that they all were in R1a-Z93.[165] This implies that R1a in Iran did not descend from "European" R1a, or vice versa. Rather, both groups are collateral, brother branches which descend from a parental group hypothesized to have initially lived somewhere between central Asia and Eastern Europe.[165]
  • R1b – M269: is widespread from Ireland to Iran, and is common in highland West Asian populations such as Armenians, Turks and Iranians – with an average frequency of 8.5%. Iranian R1b belongs to the L-23 subclade,[166] which is an older than the derivative subclade (R1b-M412) which is most common in western Europe.[167]
  • Haplogroup G and subclades: most concentrated in the Caucasus,[168] it is present in 10% of Iranians.[159]
  • Haplogroup E and various subclades are frequently found among Middle Easterners, Europeans, northern and eastern African populations. They are present in less than 10% of Iranians.

Two large – scale papers by Haber (2012)[169] and Di Cristofaro (2013)[170] analyzed populations from Afghanistan, where several Iranian-speaking groups are native. They found that different groups (e.g. Baluch, Hazara, Pashtun) were quite diverse, yet overall:

  • R1a (subclade not further analyzed) was the predominant haplogroup, especially amongst Pashtuns, the Baloch and Tajiks.
  • The presence of "East-Eurasian" haplogroup C3, especially in Hazaras (33–40%), in part linked to Mongol expansions into the region.
  • The presence of haplogroup J2, like in Iran, of 5–20%.
  • A relative paucity of "Indian" haplogroup H (< 10%).

A 2012 study by Grugni et al. analyzed the haplogroups of 15 different ethnic groups from Iran. They found that about 31.4% belong to J, 29.1% belong to R, 11.8% belong to G, and 9.2% belong to E. They found that Iranian ethnic groups display high haplogroup diversity, compared to other Middle Easterners. The authors concluded that the Iranian gene pool has been an important source for the Middle Eastern and Eurasian Y chromosome diversity, and the results suggest that there was already rather high Y chromosome diversity during the Neolithic period, placing Iranian populations in between Europeans, Middle Easterners and South Asians.[171]

A 2024 study by Vallini et al. stated that ancient and modern populations in the Iranian plateau have a similar genetic component to the Ancient West Eurasian lineage which stayed in the 'population hub' (WEC2). But they also display some ancestry from Basal Eurasians and Ancient East Eurasians via contact events starting in the Paleolithic.[172]

See also

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Iranian peoples, or Iranic peoples, are an ethnolinguistic grouping within the Indo-Iranian branch of the Indo-European family, defined primarily by their historical and contemporary use of Iranian languages derived from Proto-Iranian. These nomadic pastoralists originated among Proto-Indo-Iranian speakers in the Eurasian steppes of southeastern Russia and Central Asia, migrating southward to the Iranian Plateau and adjacent regions between approximately 2500 and 1000 BCE, where they assimilated local populations and developed distinct cultural identities. Ancient Iranian groups, such as the Medes, Persians, Parthians, and Scythians, founded expansive empires including the Achaemenid (c. 550–330 BCE), which became the largest contiguous empire in history up to that point, followed by the Parthian (247 BCE–224 CE) and Sasanian (224–651 CE) dynasties that sustained Iranian political and Zoroastrian cultural dominance against Hellenistic, Roman, and later Arab forces. Today, Iranian peoples encompass diverse groups like Persians, Kurds, Pashtuns, Baloch, and Ossetians, with an estimated 150–200 million native speakers of their languages distributed mainly across Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Turkey, and the Caucasus.

Their defining characteristics include a shared linguistic heritage marked by innovations from Proto-Indo-Iranian, such as the satem sound changes and religious terminology preserved in and Vedic traditions, alongside historical adaptations to sedentary , urbanism, and imperial administration in the plateau's fertile zones. Notable achievements encompass advancements in , as seen in Achaemenid satrapies and royal roads facilitating trade and communication over 2,500 kilometers, as well as contributions to , horsemanship, and legal codes influencing subsequent civilizations. While their steppe origins underscore a and mobility that enabled conquests, later interactions with Semitic, Turkic, and Mongol groups led to linguistic and , yet core Iranian ethnolinguistic continuity persists amid regional divergences.

Terminology and Nomenclature

Etymology and Historical Usage

![Darius I the Great's inscription showing Old Persian cuneiform with term ariya][float-right] The term "Iranian" derives from the ancient self-designation *arya-, an ethnolinguistic identifier used by speakers of Indo-Iranian languages to denote their group, contrasting with non-Aryans (an-ārya- in Indo-Aryan, an-airiia- in Iranian). In Old Persian, this appears as ariya-, first attested in Achaemenid royal inscriptions from the 6th century BCE, where it signifies ethnic origin and noble lineage. For instance, Darius I (r. 522–486 BCE) in the Behistun inscription describes himself as "ariya, ariya ciθra," meaning "Aryan, of Aryan descent," emphasizing his Persian heritage within the broader Aryan framework. Similarly, Xerxes I (r. 486–465 BCE) states "pārsa pārsahyā puça ariya ariyaciθra," identifying as "a Persian, son of a Persian, an Aryan, of Aryan descent." Etymologically, *arya- traces to Proto-Indo-Iranian *arya-, likely carrying connotations of "noble" or "honorable" as a tribal endonym, rather than a strictly racial category in the modern sense misused in 19th-20th century . This term underlies the name "," from Ērān (genitive plural of Ēr "Iranian," from *Aryānām "of the s"), denoting the land of Iranian peoples in Sassanid usage (3rd–7th centuries CE) as Ērānšahr "Realm of the Iranians." Earlier, texts (composed c. 1500–1000 BCE) employ airiia- to refer specifically to Iranian tribes, distinguishing them from Indo-Aryan counterparts, as in contrasts between airiia- daēuua- "Iranian demon-worshippers" (a Zoroastrian ) and broader Aryan cultural unity. Assyrian records from the BCE also reference and Persian groups as early Aryan entities, with Parsuaš noted in 843 BCE. Historically, "Iranian" as a descriptor evolved from this ethnic-linguistic core to encompass the diverse peoples speaking (e.g., Persian, , Scythian branches), migrating into the around the late BCE. Usage persisted through Parthian (247 BCE–224 CE) and Sassanid eras, where it denoted subjects of Iranian origin versus non-Iranian populations, without implying homogeneity but a shared Indo-Iranian heritage. In pre-Islamic contexts, it avoided the later Indo-Aryan divergence, focusing on western and eastern Iranian groups like , , and . This nomenclature informs modern scholarly classification of Iranian peoples as Iranic speakers, separate from the citizenry of the state of .

Iranian vs. Iranic Distinction

The distinction between "Iranian" and "Iranic" primarily arises in linguistic and ethnological contexts to differentiate the modern nationality from the broader . "Iranian" typically refers to citizens of the contemporary state of , encompassing a diverse population that includes speakers of non-Iranic languages such as Turkic (e.g., Azerbaijani), Semitic (e.g., ), and others, who constitute significant minorities. In contrast, "Iranic" denotes the adjectival form pertaining to the Iranian branch of the within the Indo-European family and the peoples historically associated with them, regardless of current national boundaries. Iranic languages, numbering over 80 distinct varieties, are spoken by approximately 150-200 million people across regions including , , , , , , and the , with major examples including Persian (Farsi), Kurdish, , Balochi, and Ossetic. This branch diverged from the around 2000-1500 BCE, following the Proto-Indo-Iranian stage, and is characterized by shared phonological innovations such as the evolution of Proto-Indo-European *s to *h in many positions. Iranic peoples thus include ethnic groups like , , , and , whose ancestral migrations and cultural developments predate the formation of modern by millennia, originating from the Eurasian steppes. Scholars employ "Iranic" to maintain precision, avoiding conflation with the political identity of "Iranian," which emerged prominently after the 1935 adoption of "Iran" as the official name, replacing "Persia" in international usage to reflect the country's multi-ethnic composition. This terminological clarity is essential in academic discourse, as the term "Iranian peoples" in historical contexts has denoted nomadic and settled groups speaking these languages, such as the ancient , , Parthians, and , extending far beyond the territorial limits of present-day .

Prehistoric Origins

Indo-European Migrations

The Indo-European migrations pertinent to the origins of Iranian peoples trace back to pastoralist expansions from the Pontic-Caspian steppe, where Yamnaya-related groups (circa 3300–2600 BCE) carried early Indo-European languages and genetic signatures characterized by high steppe ancestry. These populations contributed to subsequent cultures like the Corded Ware in Europe and eastward movements that formed the basis for Indo-Iranian differentiation. Genetic analyses confirm that steppe-derived male-mediated migrations, marked by R1a-Z93 Y-chromosome haplogroups prevalent in Iranian populations, link these early steppe groups to later Indo-Iranian speakers. A pivotal development occurred with the (2200–1800 BCE) in the southern Urals, featuring fortified settlements, bronze weaponry, and the earliest evidence of spoke-wheeled chariots and horse sacrifices—elements reconstructed in Proto-Indo-Iranian society through and ritual terminology. This culture, genetically continuous with Corded Ware groups via admixture of and European farmer ancestry (approximately 67% Western Steppe EMBA and 33% farmer-related), is widely regarded as the archaeological correlate of Proto-Indo-Iranian speakers based on linguistic innovations like satemization and shared vocabulary for and warfare. From , populations expanded into the Andronovo horizon (2000–900 BCE) across the Eurasian steppes and , introducing pastoralism, burials, and Indo-Iranian linguistic elements into regions adjacent to the . Archaeological parallels, including horse gear and ceramic styles, connect Andronovo to early Iranian nomadic groups, while genetic data show Andronovo individuals modeling as mixtures of local Central Asian and steppe components, facilitating southward diffusion. By 1800–1500 BCE, Andronovo-related migrants admixed with Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC) populations on the 's fringes, who derived primarily from local Iranian ancestry without prior steppe input; this hybridization produced groups (circa 1000 BCE) in and exhibiting 25–37% Iran and 10–13% Eastern European hunter-gatherer/Western Siberian hunter-gatherer components overlaid on steppe MLBA ancestry. Such admixture events, evidenced in , underpin the genetic continuity of Indo-Iranian speakers from and the to modern populations like and , with minimal subsequent disruption until medieval admixtures. By the late second millennium BCE, this process enabled the settlement of western Iranian tribes, including proto-Medes and , displacing or assimilating indigenous Elamite and Hurrian elements.

Proto-Indo-Iranian Society

The Proto-Indo-Iranian society, emerging around 2100–1800 BCE in the southern Urals, is archaeologically linked to the , characterized by fortified settlements averaging 140 meters in diameter and evidence of advanced defensive architecture. This society displayed , with burials indicating a including military-religious leaders, nobles, and commoners, where elite graves contained weapons, chariots, and horse remains suggestive of ritual sacrifices. Economically, it combined —focused on , sheep, and especially —with limited , including millet and cultivation, and that supported production and . The of spoked-wheel chariots around 2000 BCE marked a technological leap, enabling mobile warfare and reinforcing a warrior elite, while settlements show semi-sedentary patterns with mobile herding segments. This economic base facilitated expansion into the Andronovo horizon (ca. 2000–900 BCE), where pastoral nomadism predominated across . Social organization reflected a tripartite division of priests, warriors, and producers, mirrored in religious ideology and elite burial privileges promising an paradise. systems were patrilineal and patrilocal, emphasizing male lineages for and mobility, which aligned with Indo-European patterns of expansion through warrior bands. Religion centered on polytheistic worship of shared deities like * (contract and oath) and *Vṛtra-slaying heroes, with rituals involving fire (*Ātar/), the sacred /soma plant, and purifications using animal urine, all tied to maintaining cosmic order (*aša/ṛta). Funeral practices initially favored inhumation, later diverging, with myths of primordial figures like *Yima (first king) underscoring themes of paradise and flood. These elements persisted into Iranian and Indo-Aryan traditions prior to Zoroastrian reforms.

Associated Archaeological Cultures

The , dated to approximately 2100–1800 BCE and located in the southern Trans-Urals region of , represents a key archaeological correlate for the early Proto-Indo-Iranian society ancestral to Iranian peoples. This culture is distinguished by fortified settlements, such as the site of with its circular layout and defensive walls, advanced bronze metallurgy, and the earliest evidence of spoke-wheeled chariots in burials, including horse sacrifices and associated harness fittings. These features, including economies dominated by and , align with linguistic reconstructions of Proto-Indo-Iranian mobility and elites, predating the into Iranian and Indo-Aryan branches. Preceding Sintashta, the (2200–1900 BCE) in the Middle Volga to South Urals area provided a foundational context, featuring burials, copper-arsenic production, and mixed with evidence of pigs and possible agriculture, contributing genetic and cultural elements like R1a-Z93 haplogroups to later Indo-Iranian groups. 's emergence reflects interactions between Abashevo-related populations and local groups, marking a shift toward intensified and that facilitated the technological and social innovations evident in Iranian ancestral societies. The complex, succeeding and spanning roughly 2000–900 BCE across the steppes from the Urals to and , encompasses regional variants such as Petrovka, Alakul, and Fedorovo, and is broadly associated with the dispersal of Indo-Iranian speakers, including proto-Iranian groups. Characterized by , handmade cord-impressed , burials with horse interments, and continuity in use, Andronovo sites reveal economies reliant on cattle, sheep, and horses, with absence of pigs and presence of camels in eastern extents. Scholarly consensus, including analyses by Kuzmina, links Andronovo to Indo-Iranian linguistic distributions, with eastern subcultures showing succession into later Iranian nomadic traditions like those of the and Sauromatians. This horizon's vast extent, covering millions of square kilometers, underscores the migratory expansions that positioned proto-Iranian tribes for later southward movements toward the .

Historical Development

Bronze and Iron Age Settlements

The arrival of Iranian-speaking peoples on the is archaeologically associated with the early , commencing around 1250 BCE following the , though direct material evidence linking specific sites to these migrants remains indirect and debated, relying on correlations with later linguistic and historical records rather than inscriptions or unambiguous artifacts. Iranian tribes, branching from Proto-Indo-Iranians who had separated from Indo-Aryans circa 2000 BCE, likely entered from the northeast via Central Asian steppes, introducing elements such as horse-riding and grey-black pottery styles originating from regions like the Andronovo cultural horizon. This migration displaced or assimilated pre-existing non-Iranian populations, including remnants of Elamites in the southwest and or Urartians in the northwest, with settlements shifting toward fortified hilltop sites reflecting pastoral-nomadic lifestyles supplemented by agriculture. In western Iran, early Iron Age settlements are evidenced at sites like (Cemetery A, dated 1000-800 BCE) and Tepe Giyan (Level I, circa 900 BCE), where grey wares and iron tools indicate technological shifts, potentially tied to incoming Iranian groups amid regional instability post-Assyrian incursions. The hosted the Luristan culture (ca. 1300-650 BCE), known for distinctive bronze artifacts including horse bits, pins, and weapons from nomadic or semi-nomadic communities, whose style suggests links to early Iranian metallurgical traditions, though ethnic attribution remains contested due to possible Kassite influences. Further north, Hasanlu Tepe (destroyed ca. 800 BCE) yielded a citadel with diverse artifacts, including Median-period ceramics, interpreted as a pre-Median stronghold overtaken by Iranian settlers. Median settlements in northwestern Iran, emerging by the 8th century BCE, are sparsely documented but include Tepe Nush-i Jan (ca. 750-550 BCE), featuring a central fire altar and administrative structures indicative of proto-urban organization among Iranian tribes consolidating power against Assyria. Godin Tepe in the "Median triangle" shows Period II levels (9th-8th centuries BCE) with grey pottery and fortifications, correlating with the rise of Median confederacies. In the southwest, Persian Iranian groups overlaid Elamite substrates at sites like Tall-e Malyan (Anshan), with Iron Age layers (ca. 1000-550 BCE) showing continuity in settlement but introduction of Iranian onomastics in later Assyrian records. Overall, settlement patterns shifted from lowland urban centers to defensible highland villages, with population estimates for these early Iranian communities numbering in the tens of thousands across fragmented tribal polities, supported by pollen and faunal data indicating increased pastoralism. Genetic studies confirm steppe-derived ancestry admixture in Iron Age plateau populations, aligning with Indo-Iranian influx but showing substantial local continuity.

Achaemenid Empire and Classical Period

The , established by (known as ), a leader of the Persian tribe—an Iranian-speaking people from the southern —marked the first major political unification under Iranian rule. ascended to power in 559 BCE and defeated the king around 550 BCE, incorporating the , another Iranian group from northwestern , into his domain without significant ethnic displacement. This conquest extended Persian control over territories, blending the two Iranian elites in governance, with Persians assuming dominance while retaining administrative expertise. Subsequent campaigns included the subjugation of by 546 BCE and in October 539 BCE, expanding the empire to encompass diverse non-Iranian populations but centering Iranian (primarily Persian and ) nobility in the . Under Darius I (r. 522–486 BCE), a Persian noble who seized the throne after suppressing widespread revolts, the empire was reorganized into approximately 20–30 satrapies, with Iranian overseers—often Persians or —appointed as satraps to maintain loyalty and collect tribute, estimated at 9,000–14,000 talents of silver annually from core regions. The , carved circa 520 BCE, details Darius's victories over rebels claiming Achaemenid lineage and foreign usurpers, attributing success to the Iranian deity Ahuramazda and reinforcing Persian royal ideology across Iranian and subject lands in , Elamite, and Akkadian. projects, such as the Royal Road spanning 2,700 kilometers from to , facilitated military mobility and trade, benefiting Iranian reliant on horses from plateau breeds. Zoroastrian-influenced practices, rooted in ancient Iranian traditions, shaped royal ceremonies at , though tolerance extended to local cults among non-Iranian subjects. During the Classical Period, Iranian forces under Darius I and (r. 486–465 BCE) clashed with Greek city-states in the (499–449 BCE), triggered by Ionian Revolt support and aimed at securing Aegean frontiers. Persian armies, comprising Iranian core troops (Persians, ) augmented by levies from satrapies, numbered up to 200,000–300,000 at invasions like Xerxes's 480 BCE campaign, but suffered defeats at Marathon (490 BCE), Salamis (480 BCE), and (479 BCE) due to Greek superiority over dispersed Iranian and in confined terrains. These conflicts highlighted Iranian logistical prowess—evidenced by canal-digging at Athos and pontoon bridges over the Hellespont—but exposed vulnerabilities in unified command across ethnic contingents. The empire's decline accelerated under (r. 359–338 BCE), but its end came with III of Macedon's invasion in 334 BCE, culminating in decisive victories at Issus (333 BCE), Gaugamela (331 BCE), and the sack of (330 BCE), where overthrew and dismantled Achaemenid structures. Iranian resistance persisted through satrapal revolts and Bactrian holdouts, preserving cultural continuity among eastern Iranian groups like Sogdians and Bactrians, but the core Persian and Median heartlands integrated into Hellenistic successor states, influencing later Iranian revivals under the Parthians.

Parthian and Sassanid Eras

The (circa 247 BCE–224 CE), founded by Arsaces I of the tribe—a nomadic Iranian group from the southeastern Caspian steppes—represented a pivotal era for Iranian peoples, shifting power from Hellenistic Seleucid rule to indigenous Iranian control across , , and parts of . The Parthians, speaking a Northwestern Iranian closely related to dialects, maintained a decentralized feudal structure that empowered local Iranian dynasts and incorporated diverse groups like , , and eastern nomads, fostering resilience against Roman incursions through innovative cavalry tactics and diplomatic flexibility. Parthian culture synthesized traditions with settled Iranian heritage, evident in rock reliefs, silverwork, and coinage depicting Iranian motifs such as the archer king, while adopting script for administration alongside Parthian inscriptions; this period saw limited Zoroastrian institutionalization compared to later eras, with religious practices tolerating local cults amid a pragmatic that preserved Iranian linguistic and ethnic pluralism. The Sassanid Empire (224–651 CE), established by after defeating Parthian king Artabanus IV at the in 224 CE, centralized authority from (Fars) and explicitly revived a cohesive Iranian identity, styling the realm as Ērānšahr ("Empire of the Iranians") to unify Western and Eastern Iranian populations under Persian hegemony and Zoroastrian orthodoxy. Sassanid rulers, claiming Achaemenid descent, institutionalized through state-sponsored fire temples and a hierarchical , suppressing heterodoxies like while promoting (Pahlavi) as the , which facilitated administrative reforms, legal codification, and cultural patronage that elevated Iranian artistic traditions in rock carvings, textiles, and silver plate depicting heroic and royal themes. This era's emphasis on Iranian , including vast engineering projects like bridges and canals supporting a population estimated at 20–30 million, contrasted with Parthian by enforcing ethnic and religious , though eastern Iranian groups like Sogdians retained semi-autonomy in networks.

Medieval Period and Islamic Conquests

The Muslim conquest of the Sasanian Empire began in 633 CE under the , following the exhaustion of Sasanian forces from prolonged wars with the . Arab armies, initially led by commanders such as , achieved decisive victories, including the in 636 CE, where Sasanian forces under Rustam Farrukh Hormizd suffered heavy losses, and the in 642 CE, which shattered remaining organized resistance. By 651 CE, the last Sasanian monarch, , was assassinated in , marking the effective end of centralized Persian imperial rule. The conquest imposed as the dominant religion on Iranian peoples, who were predominantly Zoroastrian, through mechanisms including the poll tax on non-Muslims, incentives for conversion, and sporadic violence against resistors. Zoroastrian institutions, such as fire temples, were dismantled or repurposed, contributing to a sharp decline in adherents; estimates suggest Iran's Zoroastrian population fell from a to under 10% by the , with many fleeing to regions like in , forming the Parsi community. Despite initial tolerance under early caliphs, systemic discrimination—rooted in Arab supremacist policies under the (661–750 CE)—accelerated conversions, though Iranian cultural resilience preserved pre-Islamic elements like administrative traditions and linguistic continuity. Under the (750–1258 CE), established via a revolution backed by Persian mawali (non-Arab clients) discontented with Umayyad Arabocentrism, Iranian elites gained prominence in administration and scholarship. Persian bureaucrats, exemplified by the Barmakid family under Caliph (r. 786–809 CE), Persianized the caliphal court, integrating Sasanian bureaucratic models into Islamic governance and fostering advancements in science, philosophy, and literature—contributions often attributed to joint Arab-Persian efforts but disproportionately driven by Iranian scholars like in mathematics. The literary movement, active from the 8th to 10th centuries, asserted cultural parity or superiority of over , reflecting underlying ethnic tensions. From the 9th century onward, the "" saw the emergence of semi-independent dynasties asserting local rule over Iranian populations, including the Tahirids (821–873 CE) in , the Saffarids (861–1003 CE) under Ya'qub ibn al-Layth in , and the Samanids (819–999 CE), who patronized the revival of as a via works like Ferdowsi's (completed c. 1010 CE). These regimes, while nominally loyal to the Abbasids, facilitated the reassertion of Iranian identity, with many Iranian groups adopting as a marker of distinction from Sunni Arab rulers. Turkic migrations, culminating in the (1037–1194 CE), overlaid Iranian heartlands but adopted Persian as the administrative and cultural , preserving Iranian ethnic continuity amid nomadic incursions.

Early Modern and Contemporary History

The , established by Shah Ismail I in 1501, unified much of the under Persianate rule for the first time since the fall of the Sasanids, fostering a revival of Iranian cultural and administrative traditions while imposing as the state religion to consolidate power against Sunni rivals like the Ottomans. This religious shift, formalized in the early , entrenched Shia identity among and influenced subsequent Iranian statecraft, though it involved forced conversions and conflicts that displaced Sunni populations in eastern Iran. The dynasty's administration emphasized centralized revenue collection and military organization, drawing on Turkic tribes for support, until the Hotak Afghan invasion sacked in 1722, leading to its collapse. In the ensuing 18th-century turmoil, of the (r. 1736–1747) reconquered lost territories through extensive campaigns, including the sack of in 1739, temporarily restoring Iranian hegemony over parts of , the , and the , but his brutal taxation and religious reforms alienated subjects, culminating in his assassination and the dynasty's fragmentation into local warlordships. The under Karim Khan (r. 1751–1779) briefly stabilized southwestern from , prioritizing trade and relative tolerance over expansion, yet failed to prevent Qajar tribal ascendancy. The (1789–1925), originating from Turkmen nomads, centralized power under Agha Mohammad Khan by 1796 but suffered major territorial losses, ceding the to via the Treaties of Gulistan (1813) and Turkmenchay (1828), which reduced Iran's population and resources by incorporating millions of Iranian-speakers into Russian domains. Among non-Persian Iranian peoples, consolidated under , who founded the in 1747 from , establishing a Pashtun-dominated state encompassing modern , parts of , and eastern , which endured until the early amid internal tribal rivalries and Sikh incursions. Kurds, scattered across Safavid-Qajar borders, maintained tribal semi-autonomy but faced increasing centralization efforts, with revolts like that of (1918–1930) against Qajar authority highlighting ethnic tensions. Baloch tribes migrated eastward under Seljuk pressures from the 11th century onward, forming confederacies in the 18th century that resisted Qajar and later British incursions in Sistan-Baluchistan. Reza Shah Pahlavi, seizing power via coup in 1921 and founding the in 1925, pursued forced modernization, constructing trans-Iranian railways (completed 1938), expanding secular education to reduce illiteracy from near-total to under 50% by 1941, and building a conscript that subdued nomadic tribes, including and Baloch, to enforce national unity under Persian-centric policies. His son, Mohammad Reza Shah (r. 1941–1979), accelerated reforms through the 1963 , redistributing over 2 million hectares of land, granting women voting rights in 1963, and industrializing via oil revenues, boosting GDP growth to 12% annually in the 1970s, though SAVAK's repression of dissidents—executing or imprisoning thousands—fueled opposition from Islamists, nationalists, and ethnic minorities. The 1979 Iranian Revolution, precipitated by protests from 1977 onward—including the Qom unrest (January 1978) and Black Friday massacre (September 8, 1978)—overthrew the monarchy on February 11, 1979, installing Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's theocratic regime via referendum (98% approval claimed, March 1979), which imposed strict Islamic law, executed opponents, and seized the U.S. Embassy (November 4, 1979–January 20, 1981). The ensuing Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988) killed an estimated 500,000–1,000,000 Iranians, devastating the economy and entrenching clerical control, while policies suppressed Kurdish and Baloch autonomy, including chemical attacks on Kurdish areas in 1988. In contemporary Afghanistan, dominate politics post-2001 U.S. intervention but faced resurgence (2021), rooted in tribal codes, leading to the Islamic Emirate's restoration amid ethnic fractures. Iranian established the short-lived Mahabad Republic (1946) under Soviet auspices before Iranian reassertion, with ongoing insurgencies by groups like PJAK against Tehran's assimilation drives. Baloch nationalists in and launched rebellions, such as the 1948 uprising and 2000s insurgencies, protesting resource extraction and marginalization, resulting in thousands of deaths from state .

Ethnographic Classification

Western Iranian Groups

The Western Iranian peoples comprise ethnic groups whose languages belong to the Western branch of the Iranian language family, which divides into Northwestern (e.g., Kurdish dialects) and Southwestern (e.g., Persian and Luri) subgroups. These groups primarily inhabit the Iranian Plateau's western and southwestern regions, with extensions into , , and , and number in the tens of millions collectively, forming the core of Iran's Indo-Iranian heritage. Archaeological and linguistic evidence links their ancestors to migrations of Proto-Iranian speakers from , who established settled societies by the late 2nd millennium BCE, as evidenced by continuity in material culture from sites like and . Persians, the predominant Western Iranian group, speak Southwestern Iranian dialects of Persian (Farsi), with an estimated 65 million native speakers in as of 2013 demographic analyses, representing about 65% of the country's population of roughly 85 million at that time. Concentrated in central provinces like Fars, , and , Persians historically descend from the ancient Perisan tribes that founded the in 550 BCE under , expanding control over a territory from the Indus to the Mediterranean. Modern Persian identity solidified during the Sassanid era (224–651 CE), with cultural dominance through administration and literature, though with pre-Iranian Elamites and later Turkic elements has occurred, as shown in autosomal DNA studies indicating 50-70% steppe ancestry in core populations. Kurds, speakers of Northwestern Iranian languages like Sorani and Kurmanji, total around 7% of Iran's population, or approximately 6 million individuals, mainly in , , and West provinces bordering and . Numbering 8-10 million within Iran's borders per assessments, Kurds maintain semi-nomadic pastoral traditions in mountainous terrains, with historical records tracing clans to kingdoms of the 7th century BCE, which resisted Assyrian incursions before integrating into Achaemenid structures. Post-Islamic conquests saw tribal confederations form under dynasties like the (951–1174 CE), fostering distinct Sunni-majority identity amid Shi'a Persia, though bilingualism in Persian has increased assimilation pressures since the Pahlavi centralization in the 1920s. Lurs and their subgroups, such as the Bakhtiaris, speak Luri dialects classified as Southwestern Iranian, with over 4 million speakers clustered in Lorestan, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, and Khuzestan provinces. , estimated at 6% of Iran's populace or 5 million, exhibit nomadic herding economies adapted to the , with oral histories and linguistic retention suggesting divergence from Kurdish groups around 1000 years ago, possibly linked to post-Sassanid migrations. The Bakhtiaris, a prominent Lur tribe of about 1 million, historically controlled transhumant routes vital for Qajar-era trade (1789–1925 CE), wielding political influence through khans who allied with in 1921 before facing forced sedentarization policies that reduced from 80% to under 20% by mid-century. Both groups predominantly adhere to , integrating into national frameworks while preserving endogamous clans.

Eastern Iranian Groups

The Eastern Iranian peoples comprise ethnic groups speaking languages from the Eastern branch of the Iranian language family, which diverged from the Western branch around the 1st millennium BCE and spread eastward into , the Hindu Kush, and the Iranian Plateau's southeastern fringes. These groups historically include nomadic steppe confederations like the and Sakas, whose descendants influenced modern populations through migrations and interactions with local substrates. Modern Eastern Iranian groups are concentrated in , , Tajikistan's Pamir region, and adjacent areas, often maintaining tribal structures amid diverse linguistic and cultural adaptations. The Pashtuns (also known as Pakhtuns or Afghans in historical contexts) form the largest Eastern Iranian ethnic group, speaking Pashto, a Southeastern Iranian language with over 40 million native speakers. They number between 50 and 60 million individuals, constituting the majority ethnic group in Afghanistan (approximately 42-50% of the population) and a significant minority in Pakistan (around 15-20% in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces). Pashtun society emphasizes patrilineal tribal affiliations, with over 350 tribes and subtribes governed by customary law known as Pashtunwali, which prioritizes hospitality, revenge, and honor. Genetic studies indicate a mix of ancient Indo-Iranian steppe ancestry with South Asian and Central Asian components, reflecting migrations from the Andronovo horizon around 2000 BCE. The Baloch speak Balochi, another Southeastern Iranian language with dialects forming a continuum across their territories, and total an estimated 7-10 million people. Approximately 50% reside in Pakistan's Balochistan province (where they comprise 55% of the local population), with smaller communities in Iran's (about 2% of Iran's total population) and (around 2%). Baloch tribes trace descent from medieval confederations in the region, blending Iranian linguistic heritage with pastoral nomadic traditions adapted to arid environments; their social organization revolves around sardars (chiefs) and jirgas (tribal councils). Smaller Eastern Iranian groups include the , who inhabit the and speak East such as Shughni, Wakhi, and Rushani, with a total population of roughly 200,000-350,000. In Tajikistan's Autonomous , they form the regional majority (about 94% when including related Tajik-speakers, though distinct linguistically), numbering around 200,000 as of 2013, with additional communities in Afghanistan's (65,000) and Pakistan's (74,000). Pamiri culture features , alpine pastoralism, and polyphonic music traditions tied to their isolated high-altitude habitats. The , residing in northeastern Afghanistan's , speak (often grouped with or transitional to Eastern Iranian), totaling over 100,000 individuals as of the early . Comprising tribes like the Kati, Ashkun, and Prasun, they maintain patrilineal clans and were forcibly Islamized in the late 19th century under Amir , prior to which they practiced indigenous polytheistic beliefs. Their origins link to ancient Indo-Iranian arrivals in the Hindu Kush, with genetic continuity to pre-Islamic populations resisting lowland expansions.
GroupPrimary Language(s)Estimated PopulationMain Regions
50-60 millionAfghanistan,
BalochBalochi7-10 million, Iran, Afghanistan
Pamiri languages200,000-350,000, Afghanistan,
>100,000Afghanistan
These groups face assimilation pressures from dominant Persianate or Turkic neighbors, with evident in urbanizing areas, though rural tribal identities persist.

Ossetians and Other Northern Groups

The constitute the primary surviving ethnic group of the northeastern Iranian branch, inhabiting the central . They trace their origins to the , a late ancient nomadic confederation of Sarmatian tribes that migrated southward from the Pontic-Caspian during the early centuries CE, evading Hunnic and later invasions by retreating into Caucasian strongholds. This Alan heritage links them directly to the broader Scytho-Sarmatian cultural and linguistic continuum of the Eurasian steppes, where Iranian-speaking nomads dominated from the 8th century BCE onward. Genetic and archaeological evidence supports continuity, with Ossetian populations exhibiting steppe-derived ancestry consistent with Sarmatian burials, though admixed with local Caucasian substrates over millennia. Ossetians speak Ossetic, an Eastern Iranian language classified in the northeastern subgroup, which preserves archaic features traceable to Scythian and Sarmatian dialects, such as specific phonological shifts and vocabulary related to nomadic pastoralism and warfare. The language survives in two main dialects—Iron, spoken by the majority and serving as the literary standard, and Digor, used in western communities—divided along clan and geographic lines within Ossetian society. According to linguistic surveys, Ossetic is spoken by over 500,000 individuals, primarily in (a with around 530,000 residents as of recent censuses, the vast majority Ossetian) and (a breakaway Georgian territory with approximately 50,000 Ossetians). Smaller communities persist in Georgia proper and Russian border regions, with diaspora pockets in and among Alan descendants elsewhere in . Culturally, Ossetians maintain pre-Christian Indo-Iranian elements, including the Nart epic sagas—oral narratives of heroic warriors akin to Scythian mythology—alongside Zoroastrian-influenced customs like fire reverence and sky-god worship, adapted under Orthodox Christian overlay since the . Their social structure emphasizes clan-based and mountain , reflecting adaptation to rugged terrain rather than the open-steppe nomadism of their ancestors. Beyond , other northern Iranian remnants are marginal and largely assimilated. The people of , numbering a few thousand who claim Alan descent from 13th-century migrations, represent a cultural echo of Sarmatian diaspora but have adopted and identity, retaining only folk traditions and surnames as markers of Iranian origin. No other distinct ethnic groups preserving Scytho-Sarmatian languages or self-identified Iranian heritage endure in the northern or regions, where earlier Iranian populations were displaced or absorbed by Turkic and Slavic expansions by the medieval period.

Geographic Distribution and Demographics

Core Regions and Population Estimates

The core regions of Iranian peoples, defined ethnolinguistically as those speaking , center on the and extend across parts of the , , and . These include , , , western , northern , and scattered areas in the and former Soviet states. Historically tied to ancient migrations from the Eurasian steppes, these populations maintain distinct linguistic and cultural continuity despite political boundaries. Population estimates for Iranian peoples range from 150 to 200 million globally, derived primarily from counts of native speakers of the 86 within the Indo-Iranian branch of Indo-European. This figure accounts for both majority and minority groups, with concentrations varying by subgroup. In , the epicenter with approximately 89 million total inhabitants as of 2023 estimates, Iranian-language speakers form the demographic core, including (around 61% or roughly 54 million), (10% or 9 million), (6% or 5 million), and Baloch (2% or 1.8 million). In , Iranian peoples predominate among the estimated 41 million population, with (40-50%, or 16-20 million) and Dari/Persian-speaking (25-30%, or 10-12 million) as key groups. Tajikistan's nearly 10 million residents are overwhelmingly Tajik (84%, or about 8.4 million), speakers of a Persian dialect. Western hosts significant Baloch (around 7-10 million) and Pashtun (15-20 million) communities. Smaller but notable populations include and (totaling 25-30 million across regions) and in the (about 0.7 million). These estimates reflect linguistic affiliation, though intermarriage and assimilation introduce variability.
Major Iranian GroupEstimated Speakers (millions)Primary Core Regions
Persians (incl. dialects like , Tajik)70-110, ,
40-60,
20-30, , ,
Baloch7-10,
and Bakhtiaris4-5
These figures aggregate native speakers and are approximate due to limited data on ethnicity versus in many areas; for instance, official statistics in emphasize national unity over ethnic breakdowns, potentially undercounting minorities.

Diaspora and Migration Patterns

The , encompassing and other Iranian ethnic groups such as and , totals approximately 4 million individuals abroad as reported by Iran's in 2021, though independent estimates including second- and third-generation descendants often exceed 5 million. The largest concentrations reside in the , with around 495,000 Iranian-born immigrants recorded in 2019 census data, followed by (164,000), (127,000), the (90,000), and (83,000). Smaller but significant communities exist in , , the , and Gulf states, driven by familial networks and economic opportunities. Migration patterns feature distinct waves beginning with pre-1979 student sojourns and elite departures, accelerating post-revolution into political outflows of secular professionals, monarchists, and religious minorities fleeing theocratic consolidation. Subsequent phases involved economic amid the -Iraq (1980-1988) and sanctions, with recent surges attributed to youth disillusionment, inflation exceeding 40% annually, and protests like those in 2022. Brain drain has intensified, with 110,000 to 115,000 annual departures in 2024—surpassing totals from the prior two decades—disproportionately impacting STEM graduates and entrepreneurs, costing Iran an estimated $50 billion yearly in lost . Among non-Persian Iranian peoples, —numbering 1.2 to 1.5 million in —exhibit diaspora formation primarily from (85% of Western communities), , and , spurred by state repression, the Anfal (1986-1989), and PKK conflicts, leading to asylum claims in , , and . , concentrated in and , display regional labor migration to Gulf monarchies for construction and services since the , alongside war-induced displacements to (millions internally) and post-2021 evacuations yielding 195,000 Afghan immigrants in the United States, many Pashtun. Eastern groups like and show limited global , mostly Soviet-era relocations to and , while Baloch migrate seasonally to and for trade, constrained by border conflicts. maintain small enclaves in and Georgia, remnants of Alan migrations and 1990s ethnic strife.

Demographic Pressures and Assimilation

Iran's Persian majority and other Iranian ethnic groups within the country confront acute demographic pressures characterized by rates and substantial emigration. The (TFR) in fell to approximately 1.6 children per woman in 2023, a sharp decline from 6.4 in earlier decades, positioning the nation among the fastest-aging populations globally with projections of near-zero natural growth by 2045-2050 and negative growth thereafter. This trend persists despite pronatalist policies, driven by economic stagnation, , and cultural shifts toward smaller families, resulting in a cohort under 15 comprising only about 24% of the 85-92 million as of 2025. Concurrently, net migration rates averaged -1.9 per 1,000 annually from 2011-2016, with hundreds of thousands of skilled professionals emigrating annually, further eroding the domestic base of Iranian peoples. These pressures exacerbate assimilation dynamics for non-Persian Iranian minorities such as , , and Baloch, who constitute roughly 25-40% of Iran's population and face systemic incentives toward Persian cultural dominance. State education systems mandate Persian as the primary of instruction, contributing to intergenerational wherein urban youth increasingly adopt Persian over native Iranian tongues like Kurdish or Balochi, a process accelerated by and to Persian-majority cities. Repressive measures against ethnic , including crackdowns on cultural expressions since , have compelled partial assimilation to avoid marginalization, though resistance persists through informal networks preserving dialects and . In peripheral regions like Sistan-Baluchistan, Baloch communities experience demographic dilution via intermarriage and state-sponsored settlement of Persian speakers, diminishing distinct ethnic markers over generations. Beyond Iran, eastern Iranian groups encounter parallel assimilation strains amid varying demographic profiles. , numbering around 50-60 million primarily in and , maintain higher TFRs (approximately 4 in as of recent estimates) but face and standardization pressures in , where state policies favor national languages, leading to cultural erosion among urbanized segments. Baloch populations in and , totaling 10-15 million, undergo similar assimilation via dominant linguistic impositions, with low internal cohesion and economic disadvantages fostering out-migration and identity dilution. In , (over 80% of the 10 million ) navigate Russified legacies from Soviet eras, with urban proportions declining since 1970 due to higher rural , yet ongoing use and Russian influence hinder full cultural autonomy. in , a northern Iranian remnant of about 700,000, experience gradual Slavicization through intermarriage and language policies favoring Russian, compounding low regional aligned with broader Russian trends below replacement levels. These patterns underscore how state centralization and globalization impose selective demographic attrition on Iranian peoples outside their historical cores.

Languages

Iranian Language Branch Overview

The constitute a primary branch of the Indo-Iranian subgroup within the Indo-European , descending from Proto-Iranian, which emerged around 2000–1500 BCE from Proto-Indo-Iranian in the Eurasian steppes. This proto-language spread with migrations of Iranian-speaking tribes into the and by approximately 1500 BCE, leading to the divergence into distinct linguistic forms attested in ancient texts such as and inscriptions from the 6th century BCE. The family encompasses roughly 80 living languages spoken natively by an estimated 150–200 million people across regions from the to . Iranian languages are traditionally classified into three main subgroups: Western, Eastern, and a smaller Northern group represented primarily by Ossetic. , including Southwestern varieties like Persian (with over 110 million speakers in its modern forms of Farsi, Dari, and Tajik) and Northwestern ones such as Kurdish (around 20–40 million speakers), are predominantly spoken in , , , and adjacent areas. , such as (approximately 50 million speakers in and ) and smaller , extend from eastern to and are characterized by retention of archaic features and influences from Turkic and Mongolic substrates. Ossetic, spoken by about 500,000 in the , preserves elements linking it to ancient and Sarmatian dialects. Linguistically, Iranian languages exhibit satemization—a characteristic Indo-Iranian sound shift where Indo-European palatovelars evolved into —and ruki assimilation, alongside innovations like the development of the /f/ from Proto-Indo-European *p in certain positions. Historical stages include Old Iranian (c. 1000–300 BCE), Middle Iranian (c. 300 BCE–900 CE) with languages like Parthian and Sogdian used in trade and administration, and New Iranian (post-900 CE), marked by heavy and Turkic lexical borrowing in Western varieties due to Islamic conquests. Despite these admixtures, core grammatical structures such as ergativity in some Eastern languages and the preservation of case systems in older forms underscore their Indo-European heritage.

Major Western Iranian Languages

form a major subgroup of the Iranian branch within the , distinguished from by phonological and morphological innovations such as the change of Old Iranian *r to z in certain positions and retention of initial w-. They are typically divided into Southwestern and Northwestern subgroups, with the former including languages descending from and the latter encompassing a more diverse array of dialects spoken in the Caucasus foothills and along the . The most prominent Southwestern Iranian language is Persian, spoken natively by approximately 120 million people worldwide, primarily in (where it is the known as Farsi), (as ), and (as Tajik). Persian has a continuous literary dating back over a , using a Perso-Arabic script, and features simplified compared to ancient forms, with extensive vocabulary influence post-Islamic conquest. Closely related is Luri, a cluster of dialects spoken by 4-5 million people mainly in southwestern and southeastern , characterized by conservative features like retention of Old Iranian *č to š shifts and with Persian in some varieties. Northwestern Iranian languages include Kurdish, with 25-30 million speakers distributed across , , , and , existing as a with main varieties (northern, using Latin or ) and Sorani (central, Arabic-based script). Kurdish exhibits ergative alignment in past tenses and significant Turkic and loanwords due to historical contacts. Balochi, another key Northwestern language, is spoken by around 10 million primarily in , , and , featuring three main dialects (Eastern, Western, Southern) and classified as Northwestern despite some Southwestern traits, with a literary emerging in the using . Other Northwestern languages like Gilaki and Mazanderani, spoken by millions along Iran's Caspian coast, retain archaic features but face pressure from Persian dominance.

Major Eastern Iranian Languages

Eastern Iranian languages form the eastern subgroup of the Iranian branch within the Indo-Iranian , characterized by innovations such as the development of dental affricates from Old Iranian palatals and preservation of certain archaic features like satem reflexes. These languages are spoken discontinuously from the through to eastern and northwestern , reflecting ancient migrations of Eastern Iranian-speaking nomadic groups. The largest Eastern Iranian language by far is , with an estimated 40 to 60 million speakers, predominantly in (where it is an spoken by about 48% of the population) and (primarily in and provinces). exhibits a southeastern , features retroflex consonants unique within Iranian, and employs a modified Perso-Arabic script; it retains eight cases in its noun declension system, a trait linking it to . Ossetic, representing the northeastern branch, has approximately 600,000 speakers mainly in North Ossetia-Alania (Russia) and South Ossetia (disputed, aligned with Russia), with smaller communities in Georgia and diaspora elsewhere. This language preserves Indo-Iranian archaisms including ejective consonants and a three-way consonant distinction, and uses a modified Cyrillic alphabet in Russia and Latin in some contexts; it descends from Scythian-Sarmatian substrates. Smaller but significant are the Pamir languages, a cluster of northeastern Eastern Iranian tongues spoken by roughly 200,000 people across the Pamir Mountains in Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and China. The Shughni-Rushani group, including Shughni with about 95,000 speakers, dominates numerically, followed by Wakhi (around 40,000 speakers), which extends into border regions; these languages feature complex verb systems and are often written in Cyrillic or Perso-Arabic scripts, with many speakers bilingual in Tajik or local dominant languages. Yaghnobi, a direct descendant of Sogdian with about 12,000 speakers in Tajikistan's Yaghnob Valley and resettled areas, exemplifies another northeastern relic, used primarily in familial and oral contexts without a standardized script.
LanguageApproximate SpeakersPrimary Regions
40–60 million,
Ossetic600,000 (North Ossetia), Georgia (South Ossetia)
Shughni95,000,
Wakhi40,000, , ,
Yaghnobi12,000

Culture and Society

Pre-Islamic Customs and Institutions

Pre-Islamic Iranian societies maintained a tripartite class system rooted in Indo-Iranian traditions, comprising athravans (priests), rathaestars (warriors and ), and vastr-ya-fsuyants (herdsmen, farmers, and producers), as outlined in texts and sustained through , Achaemenid, Parthian, and Sasanian eras. This structure emphasized hereditary privileges, with landed protecting social distinctions as a , particularly under the Sasanians where classes expanded to include scribes and administrators alongside priests, warriors, and commoners. In the Achaemenid period, the placed the king atop, followed by nobles granted estates from conquests, priests, military elites, merchants, artisans, peasants, and slaves, fostering stability through land distribution across provinces from to . Administrative institutions centered on satrapies, with Darius I (r. 522–486 BCE) reorganizing the empire into over 20 linguistic and geographic units for taxation, , and infrastructure like the Royal Road spanning 2,700 kilometers. Parthian adopted feudal , relying on regional noble houses for , while Sasanian rulers like (r. 531–579 CE) pursued centralization through agrarian reforms, fiscal policies, and alliances with Zoroastrian to bolster royal authority over feudal lords. Economic institutions supported agriculture via irrigation systems incentivized by tax relief, large royal and noble estates worked by tenants or slaves, and trade facilitated by standardized weights, measures, and coinage introduced by Darius. Kinship and family customs were patrilineal and patriarchal, with the serving as a focal point for across periods. required formal written contracts to bind families, often involving consanguineous unions—such as between close kin—to preserve noble bloodlines, a practice endorsed in Zoroastrian texts and common among elites from Achaemenid times onward. Sasanian royalty exemplified expansive harems, as (r. 590–628 CE) reportedly maintained 3,000 wives and concubines, reflecting institutionalized . Legal customs under Darius protected dependents, treating slaves as compensated servants rather than chattel, with provisions against mistreatment. Cultural customs included exposure of the dead on platforms to avoid polluting earth, water, or fire, per Zoroastrian purity rites, alongside communal banquets, storytelling, and games like precursors to for social bonding. Daily life integrated physical training in archery and horsemanship, especially among nomadic eastern Iranian groups like , while settled emphasized estate management and trade. Persepolis records from 509–493 BCE document equal labor rations for men and women, with bonuses for skilled workers and mothers bearing sons, indicating pragmatic gender roles in workforce institutions.

Literary and Artistic Traditions

The literary traditions of Iranian peoples originated in ancient oral compositions, with the serving as the foundational text of , compiled from hymns (Gathas) attributed to and later ritual and legal sections in , an Eastern Iranian language spoken around 1500–1000 BCE. These texts, preserved through priestly recitation, encompass cosmology, ethics, and liturgy, reflecting early Iranian worldview before widespread writing. Achaemenid royal inscriptions in , dating from the 6th century BCE, mark the advent of vernacular written literature, as exemplified by Darius I's trilingual detailing conquests and divine favor. Under the Sassanid Empire (224–651 CE), (Pahlavi) literature flourished in prose forms, including religious commentaries (Zand) on the , epic histories like the Khwaday-Namag (Book of Lords), and Manichaean and Zoroastrian treatises that synthesized mythology and kingship narratives. Post-Islamic conquest, literature revived these motifs, culminating in Ferdowsi's , completed circa 1010 CE, a 50,000-couplet epic drawing from Sassanid sources to chronicle Iranian kings from mythical origins to the 7th-century Arab invasions, thereby safeguarding pre-Islamic heritage against cultural erosion. Classical Persian poetry, dominant from the 11th to 14th centuries, featured masters like Saadi (c. 1210–1291 CE), whose Gulistan and Bustan integrated moral fables with lyricism, and (c. 1315–1390 CE), whose ghazals explored love, wine, and Sufi mysticism while invoking Zoroastrian echoes. These works, composed in quantitative meter, emphasized humanism and irony, influencing broader Iranian identity across Western and Eastern branches. Eastern Iranian traditions, such as and Ossetic oral epics, paralleled this with heroic tales akin to the , though less documented in writing until later centuries. Artistic traditions emphasized symbolic representation and craftsmanship, with pre-Islamic settled Iranian art manifesting in Achaemenid palace reliefs at (circa 500 BCE) depicting tribute bearers and lion hunts in shallow carving, and Sassanid rock reliefs and silver vessels illustrating equestrian victories and investitures. Nomadic Eastern Iranian groups, including and (8th century BCE–4th century CE), developed the "animal style" in gold plaques, harness fittings, and tattoos, featuring intertwined mythical beasts like griffins and stags symbolizing power and mobility, as unearthed in burials from the Eurasian steppes. These motifs, rooted in shamanistic beliefs, persisted in portable media suited to pastoral life, contrasting yet complementing the monumental styles of urban centers. Pre-Islamic elements, such as heraldic motifs and figural dynamism, endured into Islamic-era Iranian arts, informing manuscript illumination and metalwork while adapting to aniconic constraints in religious contexts. Literary and artistic outputs thus reinforced ethnic cohesion among dispersed Iranian groups, prioritizing themes of , , and moral order over transient political shifts.

Social Structures and Family Systems

Traditional social structures among Iranian peoples emphasize networks and tribal affiliations, particularly among pastoralist and rural groups such as , Baloch, , , and nomadic confederacies like the Qashqai and Bakhtiari. These structures often feature with hereditary leaders—such as sardars among Baloch tumans (tribes) or khans in Pashtun clans—facilitating political alliances, resource allocation, and dispute resolution through customary codes like , which prioritizes hospitality, revenge, and asylum. Stratification exists within tribes, including occupational classes among Baloch (e.g., hakomzat elites, Baloch herders, urban shahri, and lower-status ), reflecting adaptations to ecological and economic pressures rather than egalitarian ideals. Family systems are predominantly patriarchal and patrilineal, with authority vested in senior males who control decisions on , , and mobility for wives and children. Kinship extends beyond the nuclear unit—comprising about 83% of Iranian families—to broader tayefeh (lineage groups) that provide economic support, social status, and protection, especially in villages where collective honor () governs behavior and shields internal conflicts from outsiders. Marriage customs traditionally involve parental arrangement or approval to strengthen alliances, though love-based unions have increased in urban settings; endogamy within kin or reinforces cohesion, while gender segregation limits women's public roles, confining them to domestic cooperation without formal single-sex institutions in many groups. Variations persist across subgroups: urban Persians favor modest nuclear families with 1-2 children embedded in extended networks, prioritizing elder respect and family prestige over individualism, whereas peripheral tribes like maintain segmentary lineages (khels) subdivided from larger tribes, embedding family loyalty within broader confederations. Kurdish and Baloch societies similarly integrate family units into tribal federations for survival amid marginal environments, though modernization has eroded nomadic bases, shifting some toward settled, state-influenced hierarchies without fully dismantling patrilineal cores.

Religion

Ancient Polytheistic Beliefs

The ancient polytheistic beliefs of Iranian peoples originated in the Proto-Indo-Iranian religious tradition, shared with Vedic India and dating to approximately 2000–1500 BCE, as evidenced by linguistic parallels between Avestan and Sanskrit texts. This system featured a pantheon of deities divided into ahuras ("lords") and daevas ("shining gods" or celestial beings), both classes initially venerated without the moral dualism later introduced by Zoroastrianism. Key ahuras included Ahura Mazdā ("Wise Lord"), conceptualized as the supreme creator and upholder of cosmic order (aša), alongside Miθra (god of covenants, oaths, and solar light) and Apąm Napāt ("Son of the Waters," a fire-in-water deity). Daevas, such as Indra and Nairyo Saŋha, represented dynamic, martial, or natural forces and were not yet demonized. Cosmology emphasized a structured universe with seven climes (karšvar), a central cosmic mountain (Harā bərəzaitī), and elements like fire (Ātar), water, sky (Asman), and earth (Zam), often personified as deities subject to ritual purification. Rituals, preserved in fragments of the Avesta and reconstructed via Indo-Iranian comparisons, involved yasna sacrifices—offerings of animal fat, milk, and the sacred haoma plant (a hallucinogenic brew paralleling Vedic soma)—performed at fire altars to invoke divine favor and maintain aša against chaos. Priests (magi in later Median contexts) conducted these without temples or idols, as noted by Herodotus in describing Persian practices of mountain-top sacrifices to a supreme "Zeus" (equated with Ahura Mazdā). Exposure of the dead on platforms, rather than Vedic cremation, reflected beliefs in ritual purity and avoidance of polluting earth or fire. Archaeological and textual evidence, including Scythian-era artifacts from the Eurasian steppes (ca. 900–300 BCE) depicting horse sacrifices and solar motifs linked to Miθra, corroborates continuity of these beliefs among eastern Iranian nomads. In contrast to Vedic elevation of devas over asuras, pre-Zoroastrian Iranian sources suggest balanced worship of both categories, with daevas tied to warrior cults and ahuras to sovereignty; this symmetry fragmented under Zoroaster's reforms (ca. 1200–1000 BCE), which subordinated daevas as malevolent and centralized Ahura Mazdā, though yašts in the Younger Avesta retain invocations to pre-reform deities like Vərəθraγna (victory god) and Anāhitā (water and fertility goddess). Such reconstructions rely on comparative philology, as direct pre-Zoroastrian Iranian texts are absent, supplanted by Avestan redactions under Achaemenid patronage.

Zoroastrianism as State Religion

Zoroastrianism became integral to royal ideology in the Achaemenid Empire (c. 550–330 BCE), with Darius I (r. 522–486 BCE) prominently invoking Ahura Mazda as the supreme god and source of kingship in inscriptions like the Behistun Inscription. While Cyrus the Great (r. 559–530 BCE) emphasized religious tolerance without Zoroastrian references in surviving texts such as the Cyrus Cylinder, Darius formalized Ahura Mazda worship, introducing concepts of ritual purity. Xerxes I (r. 486–465 BCE) advanced this by enforcing exclusivity, destroying daeva temples as noted in the Xerxes Persepolis inscription (XPh), marking a progression toward state-sponsored orthodoxy. The , a hereditary priestly class, officiated state rituals including sacrifices, fire maintenance, and ceremonies, holding tax-exempt status and advisory roles at court, with evidence from tablets documenting their administrative involvement. In the (247 BCE–224 CE), persisted among the nobility with managing sacred resources, such as wine allocations for rituals in 72 BCE, though the regime tolerated diverse faiths including Greek and Babylonian cults alongside Zoroastrian practices. Under the (224–651 CE), (r. 224–242 CE) elevated to official state religion, forging a church-state alliance with hierarchical clergy and widespread fire temples. High priest (Kerdir), empowered under (r. 240–270 CE), centralized authority through priestly appointments and inscriptions promoting orthodoxy against competitors like and . The chief priest (mowbed) bolstered royal legitimacy by embedding Zoroastrian dualism into governance, facilitating text standardization and cultural unification among Iranian peoples.

Islamic Era Transitions and Resistances

The Arab conquest of the , commencing in 633 CE with raids into and culminating in the death of the last Sasanian monarch in 651 CE, initiated a protracted transition for Iranian peoples from to . Key military defeats, including the in 636 CE and the in 642 CE, shattered Sasanian resistance and facilitated Arab control over core Persian territories, though pockets of Zoroastrian holdouts persisted in regions like and until the 8th century. Initially, Zoroastrians were granted status under Islamic law, requiring payment of the in exchange for protection, but this system imposed economic burdens that incentivized conversion, particularly among lower classes and urban dwellers. Conversion proceeded unevenly over two to three centuries, with estimates indicating that by the , a majority of Iranians had adopted , driven not solely by persuasion but by systemic pressures such as the destruction of fire temples—over 30,000 reportedly razed during the conquest phase—and the targeted killing of Zoroastrian priests (), which dismantled religious infrastructure. Arab governors enforced discriminatory policies, including bans on public Zoroastrian rituals and intermarriage restrictions favoring , accelerating demographic shifts; significant Zoroastrian emigration to , forming the Parsi community, occurred as early as the in response to these measures. Despite Abbasid caliphs' nominal tolerance after 750 CE, intermittent persecutions, such as those under in the 850s, further eroded Zoroastrian numbers to under 10% by the . Military resistances underscored Iranian rejection of Arab dominance. In the 750s CE, Sunpadh, a Zoroastrian priest in , led a revolt against Abbasid forces, briefly capturing key fortresses before suppression in 760 CE. More enduring was the uprising of from 816 to 837 CE in , where his Khurramite forces, blending Zoroastrian and proto-Shiite elements, defeated multiple caliphal armies and controlled mountainous terrain, symbolizing defiance against Arab fiscal exploitation and cultural imposition; Babak's execution in 837 CE marked the revolt's end but inspired later dissent. Similar insurrections in and during the 9th century weakened Umayyad and early Abbasid authority, paving the way for Persian-led dynasties like the Tahirids (821–873 CE). Culturally, the Shu'ubiyya movement emerged in the 8th–9th centuries as a non-violent resistance, comprising Persian literati and converts who asserted the equality of shu'ub (peoples) against Arab ethnic supremacy, extolling pre-Islamic Iranian heritage through and that critiqued Arab customs while adapting Islamic frameworks. Figures like translated Persian texts into Arabic, fostering a of Islamic administration—evident in the dominance of Iranian viziers under Abbasid caliphs—and contributing to the revival of the in (Farsi) by the 9th century. This intellectual push, while not overtly anti-Islamic, preserved Iranian identity amid , influencing the rise of independent Persian states and the eventual Shiite orientation in , which incorporated messianic elements resonant with Zoroastrian .

Modern Religious Dynamics

In Iran, where Persians form the majority of the population, Twelver Shia Islam remains the , with official estimates indicating that approximately 90% of the population adheres to and 9% to , primarily among ethnic minorities such as , Baloch, and . However, independent surveys reveal significant deviations from these figures, with a 2020 GAMAAN poll of over 50,000 respondents finding that only 32.2% identified as Shia Muslim, while 8.8% claimed Zoroastrian affiliation, 5% Sunni, 3.2% atheist, and 22.2% identifying as "none" or unspecified, suggesting widespread underreporting of non-Shia beliefs due to legal risks associated with , which carries the penalty under Iran's penal code. A 2023 government-commissioned study corroborated this trend, with 85% of respondents stating that Iranians have become less religious over the prior five years, attributing the shift to dissatisfaction with theocratic and exposure to global ideas via the . Among Iran's youth, and cultural revivalism have gained traction, often manifesting as symbolic adherence to as a pre-Islamic Iranian identity rather than strict religious practice; for instance, neo-Zoroastrian converts from Muslim backgrounds frame their shift as resistance to Islamist rule, though the official Zoroastrian population remains small at around 25,000. Concurrently, underground has experienced explosive growth, with estimates of 300,000 to 1 million converts since the 1979 Revolution, making it the world's fastest-growing Christian community despite severe , including arrests, church closures, and executions for proselytizing; this expansion is linked to disillusionment with Shia orthodoxy and reports of supernatural experiences, such as dreams of , disseminated via satellite TV and . Religious minorities face systemic discrimination under Iran's constitution, which reserves political rights for recognized groups (Zoroastrians, , ) but excludes Baha'is—estimated at 300,000—and subjects Sunnis to underrepresentation; the U.S. State Department documented over 100 arbitrary arrests of and Baha'is in 2023 alone, alongside property seizures and educational barriers, actions classified by as . Among non-Persian Iranian peoples, (predominantly Sunni, with some ) in western and experience sectarian tensions exacerbated by Tehran's Shia-centric policies, while Baloch in southeastern and adhere mostly to amid insurgencies blending ethnic and religious grievances. , concentrated in and , overwhelmingly follow , with dynamics shaped by the Taliban's 2021 enforcement of strict Deobandi interpretations, leading to suppressed minority faiths like Ismaili Shia among some Tajik-Pashtun overlaps. In , Tajik Iranian peoples exhibit higher under state atheism's legacy, with only nominal Sunni observance and government crackdowns on Islamist extremism. These patterns reflect broader causal pressures: state-enforced orthodoxy in and fostering underground dissent, contrasted with secular drifts in and less theocratic regions.

Genetics and Physical Anthropology

Paternal Haplogroups and Lineages

The Y-chromosome haplogroups of Iranian peoples exhibit a diverse profile dominated by West Eurasian lineages, with J-M172 (31.4% overall, including J2-M172 at 22.5%) representing the most frequent clade, associated with pre-Neolithic and Neolithic dispersals across the and . R-M207 follows at 29.1%, primarily comprising R1a-M198 and R1b-M269 subclades, the former linked to Bronze Age expansions from the Pontic-Caspian that facilitated the Proto-Indo-Iranian linguistic dispersal into the region circa 2000–1500 BCE. G-M201 (11.8%, mainly G2a-P15) and E-M96 (9.2%, including E1-M123) constitute additional significant components, reflecting and Levantine influences. Frequencies vary across ethnic subgroups: Persians and Zoroastrians from central show elevated J2a-M530 (up to 17.6% in samples), indicative of localized continuity, while R1a-M198 reaches notable levels in eastern groups like Baloch and Turkmen-admixed populations, aligning with historical eastern Iranian nomadic incursions. exhibit higher E1b (13.6%) alongside R1a, potentially tied to post-Iron Age integrations, whereas and Bakhtiaris display balanced J and R distributions without stark deviations. analyses across 11 ethnic groups, including , , Baloch, Lurs, and Sistanis, reveal overlapping profiles with minimal clustering, underscoring shared paternal ancestry punctuated by subtle Turkic or Arab admixtures in peripheral groups like Azeris. Ancient DNA from the northern demonstrates genetic continuity in paternal lineages over 3,000 years, from the Copper Age to the Sassanid Empire (circa 3000 BCE–651 CE), with J, G, L, R, and T persisting as core haplogroups; J2 frequencies rose during the , coinciding with Indo-Iranian arrivals, while H emerged later via South Asian contacts. This stability contrasts with autosomal shifts, suggesting resilient male-mediated transmission amid female-biased from neighboring substrates. R1a subclades like Z93-Z94, prevalent in modern Indo-Iranian speakers, underscore a steppe-derived paternal contribution to the of groups such as and Baloch, despite dilution by indigenous J2 dominance.

Autosomal DNA and Admixture Studies

Autosomal DNA analyses of modern Iranian populations, encompassing ethnic groups such as , , , Baloch, and others, demonstrate substantial genetic homogeneity across these groups, attributable to shared autochthonous ancestry from ancient West Eurasian sources including farmers from the Zagros region and subsequent admixtures. A comprehensive study of 1,021 individuals from 11 Iranian ethnic groups using genome-wide SNP data revealed that positions Iranians intermediate between Europeans and South Asians, with the majority of variation explained by long-term genetic continuity rather than recent differentiation. This homogeneity persists despite linguistic and cultural distinctions, as evidenced by low F_ST values (e.g., 0.002–0.005) among groups like Persians and , indicating minimal barriers to over millennia. Admixture modeling in these studies identifies primary components as deriving from early Iranian hunter-gatherers and populations (contributing ~50–70% ancestry), augmented by Caucasus hunter-gatherer-related input and a smaller steppe component (5–15%, higher in northern and eastern groups) linked to Indo-Iranian expansions around 2000–1000 BCE. Additional admixture events include minor South and Central Asian dated to approximately 0–37 generations ago (contributing 5–20%), and trace African ancestry (<2%) in some southern populations, consistent with historical trade and migrations rather than large-scale replacements. Zoroastrian Iranians exhibit reduced admixture proportions compared to Muslim groups, with lower South/Central Asian (3–10%) and European-like inputs, reflecting historical and isolation following Islamic conquests. Recent ancient DNA integrations confirm genetic continuity: Iron Age samples from the (ca. 1000 BCE–651 CE) cluster closely with modern , showing no major discontinuities from Indo-Iranian arrivals through the Achaemenid and Sassanid periods, with admixture primarily predating the . A 2025 analysis of 44 ancient genomes from northern spanning the to Islamic eras further supports this, modeling modern populations as ~80–90% derived from local sources with limited post-Islamic Turkic or genomic impact (<5% on average). Variations exist regionally—e.g., Baloch show elevated South Asian affinity (up to 20%)—but overall, Iranian autosomal profiles underscore resilience to invasions, with ancestry distinguishing them from neighboring Semitic or Turkic groups.

Comparisons with Neighboring Populations

Iranian populations demonstrate distinct autosomal genetic signatures relative to neighboring groups, clustering into a Central Iranian Cluster (CIC) encompassing , , , Azeris, , and Mazanderanis, with minimal internal differentiation (Fst values ranging from 0.0008 to 0.0033). This CIC exhibits closer genetic affinity to West Eurasian populations, including Europeans (Fst approximately 0.0105–0.0294), than to South Asians (Fst 0.0141–0.0338) or East Asians (Fst 0.0645–0.1055), reflecting ancient continuity on the with limited recent admixture from distant sources. Border ethnicities show targeted external influences: Turkmen and Sistanis carry elevated Central Asian ancestry, Baluchis align more with South Asian profiles, and Persian Gulf Islanders display minor African components (up to 5–10% in admixture models), underscoring geographic barriers' role in preserving core Iranian heterogeneity. In Y-chromosome haplogroup distributions, Iranians exhibit high patrilineal diversity (gene diversity 0.952), dominated by J at 31.4% (predominantly J2-M172 at 22.5%, linked to expansions), followed by R at 29.1% (including Indo-Iranian-associated R1a-M198 up to 25% in some groups) and G at 11.8%. This contrasts with neighboring , where J1-M267 often exceeds 30–50% (e.g., 33.4% in Khuzestan Arabs mirroring Iraqi profiles), signaling Semitic-specific patrilines less prevalent in core Iranians (J1 ≤10% nationally). Turkish and Central Asian neighbors feature higher frequencies of East Eurasian markers like Q-M25 (up to 42% in Iranian Turkmen) and N, diluting West Eurasian dominance seen in Iranians, while and North Caucasians share elevated G and J2 but lack the steppe-derived R1a prominence in Indo-Iranian groups. Iranian Azeris, despite Turkic speech, reveal substantial North Caucasian patrilineal input (e.g., higher I and G subclades) and closer affinities to Caucasians than to Anatolian Turks, indicating limited Turkic replacement and retention of pre-Turkic substrates. Overall, these patterns highlight Iranians' role as a genetic reservoir in Western Asia, with Indo-Iranian steppe influxes (via R1a) differentiating them from Semitic () to the southwest and Altaic-influenced Turks to the northwest, while shared ancestry binds them proximally to and without erasing ethnic boundaries. Physical anthropological assessments, though secondary to genomic data, align with genetic findings: Iranian groups predominantly display Caucasoid morphology (e.g., dolichocephalic indices averaging 75–80 in and ), overlapping with Caucasian neighbors but diverging from more brachycephalic Central Asian Turks or broader-nosed , per classical craniometric surveys adjusted for admixture. Modern studies confirm this via principal component analyses of craniofacial metrics, where Iranians plot intermediately between Levantine and Caucasian extremes, corroborating autosomal continuity over from historical interactions.

Modern Identity and Politics

Rise of Ethnic Nationalisms

The emergence of distinct ethnic nationalisms among non-Persian Iranian peoples, such as and Baloch, gained momentum in the late 19th and early 20th centuries amid the Qajar dynasty's weakening central authority and exposure to European nationalist ideologies through intellectuals and reformers. During the Constitutional Revolution of 1905-1911, demands for representative governance initially fostered broader Iranian unity but also highlighted ethnic grievances, as minority groups sought recognition of linguistic and cultural rights against Persian dominance. Kurdish proto-nationalism, for instance, crystallized in the with uprisings led by figures like Sheikh Ubeydullah, who mobilized cross-border tribal networks against Ottoman and Persian overreach, framing resistance in terms of shared ethnic kinship rather than solely religious or tribal loyalties. Reza Shah Pahlavi's nation-building policies from 1925 onward accelerated ethnic assertions by enforcing linguistic assimilation, banning non-Persian languages in education and administration, and relocating populations to dilute regional identities—measures that provoked backlash among Iranian-language-speaking minorities. , rooted in resistance to Qajar incorporation of and Baluchestan since the , intensified under these centralizing efforts, with tribal leaders invoking historical autonomy to challenge ’s economic marginalization and cultural erasure. Similarly, Kurdish movements evolved from tribal revolts to politicized nationalism, viewing Persian-centric policies as existential threats; by the 1940s, Soviet-backed experiments like the (January-November 1946) demonstrated organized demands for self-rule, led by and emphasizing ethnic over Marxist ideology alone. Post-World War II geopolitical shifts, including the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic's brief existence (1945-1946), further emboldened ethnic , though its suppression underscored the Iranian state's intolerance for . The 1979 Islamic Revolution initially raised hopes for minority inclusion via Khomeini's promises of autonomy, but the subsequent centralization under the —coupled with violent crackdowns on uprisings in (1979-1983) and Baluchestan—reinforced ethnic solidarity as a counter to both monarchist Persian chauvinism and clerical Arabo-Islamic . These dynamics persist, with groups like the Party of Free Life of (PJAK) and Baloch insurgencies framing their struggles as defenses against systemic , including underrepresentation in and resource extraction favoring Persian heartlands.

Conflicts and Separatist Movements

Iran's ethnic minorities, including , Baloch, and , have pursued separatist or autonomy movements amid grievances over cultural suppression, economic marginalization, and political underrepresentation, though these efforts have faced severe crackdowns by the (IRGC) and other state forces. The Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran (KDPI) led a major following the 1979 Islamic Revolution, resulting in over 30,000 civilian deaths and 4,000 Kurdish fighters killed before the armed phase subsided by 1996. The Party of Free Life of (PJAK), an offshoot linked to the PKK, resumed in 2004, with notable clashes in 2007-2011 killing dozens of fighters on both sides, including over 50 PJAK militants and 8 IRGC personnel in July 2011 alone. These groups operate from border areas in , citing ’s bans on Kurdish language education and as drivers. Baloch separatists in , predominantly Sunni, have conducted insurgent attacks through groups like Jaish al-Adl (JAA), which evolved from Jundallah in 2012 and is designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. since 2019. JAA claimed responsibility for twin bombings on , 2024, killing six IRGC members in the province, amid ongoing border skirmishes with where militants seek sanctuary. Motivated by sectarian discrimination and resource exploitation in a impoverished region, these attacks have escalated since 2021, with responding via airstrikes into in January 2024. Casualties remain sporadic but cumulative, fueling cycles of retaliation without achieving territorial control. In Khuzestan (Arab-populated Ahwaz), the Arab Struggle Movement for the Liberation of Ahwaz (ASMLA) advocates independence, claiming attacks like the 2017 bombing of two oil pipelines that disrupted exports. Ethnic , comprising about 3% of Iran's but concentrated in oil-rich areas, protest diversion, , and confiscation, with ASMLA's armed wing targeting infrastructure. Iran executed ASMLA's former leader, dual Iranian-Swedish citizen , in May 2023 on charges, designating the group a terrorist entity while denying broader separatist appeal. Azeri Iranian movements, centered in northwest provinces, emphasize cultural revival over outright , with groups like the pushing for language rights rather than . Despite occasional protests against Persian-centric policies, intermarriage and urban assimilation in limit separatist momentum, and claims of widespread toward are often exaggerated by external actors. State responses prioritize integration, viewing ethnic unity as a bulwark against fragmentation, though protests in 2022-2023 highlighted underlying tensions across minorities.

State Policies and Integration Debates

The of Iran's establishes Persian as the sole while nominally permitting the use of local , such as Kurdish, Balochi, and Luri, in media and education in regions where they predominate, as outlined in Article 15. affirms equal rights for all citizens regardless of , , or , framing the as a unified under Shia Islamic . However, implementation has prioritized Persian linguistic and cultural dominance, fostering debates over assimilation versus multicultural recognition, with state policies emphasizing national unity through to a Persian-Shia identity. In practice, policies, inherited from the Pahlavi era and sustained post-1979, restrict mother-tongue for non-Persian Iranian-language speakers, confining instruction to Persian from onward and limiting optional local-language classes to avoid "." A 2025 parliamentary proposal to expand non-Persian language teaching in schools was rejected, citing threats to national cohesion, despite advocacy from ethnic activists for compliance with constitutional provisions. This approach has exacerbated educational disparities, with non-Persian children facing higher dropout rates and linguistic alienation, as Persian-only curricula hinder early learning and cultural retention. Among Kurdish populations in western Iran, demands for cultural autonomy—including and local governance—have persisted since the 1946 Mahabad Republic, met with state repression framing such claims as security threats. Kurdish parties like the KDPI and Komala seek within a federal democratic framework, but enforces central control, banning ethnic political organizations and responding to protests with arrests and military operations, as seen in crackdowns following the 2022-2023 nationwide unrest. Similarly, Baloch in face economic marginalization and governance failures, with integration policies focusing on security deployments rather than development, fueling separatist sentiments and cross-border militancy. Debates on integration intensify amid rising inter-ethnic solidarity in protests, where , Baloch, and highlight systemic discrimination in and representation, contrasting the state's narrative of ethnic harmony. Reformist voices have occasionally advocated devolved powers to mitigate grievances, but hardline policies prevail, viewing as a prelude to influenced by external actors. Iran's delegation to the UN Committee on the Elimination of in 2024 asserted no ethnic divisions exist, attributing disparities to class rather than policy, a claim contested by monitors documenting disproportionate executions and poverty in minority regions. These tensions underscore causal links between centralist assimilation and ethnic unrest, with unresolved debates hindering stable integration.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.