Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Maimonides
View on Wikipedia
Key Information
| Part of a series on the |
| Philosophy of religion |
|---|
Moses ben Maimon[a] (1138–1204), commonly known as Maimonides (/maɪˈmɒnɪdiːz/, my-MON-ih-deez)[b] and also referred to by the Hebrew acronym Rambam (Hebrew: רמב״ם),[c] was a Sephardic rabbi and philosopher who became one of the most prolific and influential Torah scholars of the Middle Ages. In his time, he was also a preeminent astronomer and physician, serving as the personal physician of Saladin.
He was born on Passover eve 1138 or 1135,[d] and lived in Córdoba in al-Andalus (now in Spain) within the Almoravid Empire until his family was expelled for refusing forced conversion to Islam.[6][7][8] Later, he lived in Morocco and Egypt and worked as a rabbi, physician and philosopher.
During his lifetime, most Jews greeted Maimonides' writings on Jewish law and ethics with acclaim and gratitude, even as far away as Iraq and Yemen. Yet, while Maimonides rose to become the revered head of the Jewish community in Egypt, his writings also had vociferous critics, particularly in Spain. He died in Fustat, and, according to Jewish tradition, was buried in Tiberias. The Tomb of Maimonides is a popular pilgrimage and tourist site.
He was posthumously acknowledged as one of the foremost rabbinic decisors and philosophers in Jewish history, and his copious work comprises a cornerstone of Jewish scholarship. His fourteen-volume Mishneh Torah still carries significant canonical authority as a codification of halakha.[9]
Aside from being revered by Jewish historians, Maimonides also figures very prominently in the history of Islamic and Arab sciences. Influenced by Aristotle, al-Farabi, ibn Sina, and his contemporary ibn Rushd, he became a prominent philosopher and polymath in the Islamic world and for Jews in general.
Name
[edit]Maimonides' Arabic name was أَبُو عَمْرَان مُوسَى بْن مَيْمُون بْن عُبَيْد ٱللّٰه ٱلْقُرْطُبِيّ "Abū ʿImrān Mūsā bin Maimūn bin ʿUbaydallāh al-Qurṭubī", "Moses 'son of Amram"[e] son of Maymun, of Obadiah,[f] the Cordoban", or more often simply "Moses, son of Maymun" (موسى بن ميمون). and Hebrew: משה ברבי מימון הספרדי "Moses, son of rabbi Maymun the Iberian".[g] In Medieval Hebrew, he was usually called ר״ם Ram, short for "our Rabbi Moshe", but mostly he is called רמב״ם Rambam, short for "our Rabbi, Moshe son of Maimon".
In Greek, the Hebrew ben ('son of') becomes the patronymic suffix -ides, forming Μωησής Μαϊμονίδης "Moses Maimonides".
He is sometimes known as "The Great Eagle" (Hebrew: הנשר הגדול, romanized: haNesher haGadol).[10]
Biography
[edit]Early years
[edit]
Maimonides was born 1138 (or 1135) in Córdoba in the Muslim-ruled Almoravid Caliphate, at the end of the Golden Age of Jewish culture in Spain after the first centuries of Muslim rule. His father, Maimon ben Joseph, was a dayyan or rabbinic judge. Aaron ben Jacob ha-Kohen later wrote that he had traced Maimonides' descent back to Simeon ben Judah ha-Nasi from the Davidic line.[11] His ancestry, going back four generations, is given in his Epistle to Yemen as Moses ben Maimon ben Joseph ben Isaac ben Obadiah.[12] At the end of his commentary on the Mishnah, however, a longer, slightly different genealogy is given: Moses ben Maimon ben Joseph ben Isaac ben Joseph ben Obadiah ben Solomon ben Obadiah.[g]
Maimonides studied Torah under his father, who had in turn studied under Joseph ibn Migash, a student of Isaac Alfasi. At an early age, Maimonides developed an interest in contemporary science and philosophy. He read ancient Greek philosophy accessible via Arabic translations and was deeply immersed in the sciences and learning of Islamic culture.[13]
Maimonides, who was revered for his personality as well as for his writings, led a busy life, and wrote many of his works while travelling or in temporary accommodation.[14]
Exile
[edit]A Berber dynasty, the Almohads, conquered Córdoba in 1148 and abolished dhimmi status (i.e., state protection of non-Muslims ensured through payment of the jizya tax) in some territories. [which?]The loss of this status forced Jewish and Christian communities to choose between conversion to Islam, martyrdom, or exile.[14] Many Jews were forced to convert, but due to suspicion by the authorities of fake conversions, the new converts had to wear identifying clothing that set them apart and made them subject to public scrutiny.[16]
Maimonides' family, along with many other Jews, chose exile. For the next ten years, Maimonides moved about in southern Spain and North Africa, eventually settling in Fas. Some say that his teacher in Fez was Yehuda Ha-Cohen Ibn Susan, until the latter was killed in 1165.[17]
During this time, he composed his acclaimed commentary on the Mishnah during 1166–1168.[h]
Following this sojourn in Morocco, he lived in Acre with his father and brother, before settling in Fustat in Fatimid Caliphate-controlled Egypt by 1168.[18] There is mention that Maimonides first settled in Alexandria, and moved to Fustat only in 1171.[19][20] While in Cairo, he studied in a yeshiva attached to a small synagogue, which now bears his name.[21] In Jerusalem, he prayed at the Temple Mount. He wrote that this day of visiting the Temple Mount was a day of holiness for him and his descendants.[22]
Maimonides was soon instrumental in helping rescue Jews taken captive during the Christian Amalric of Jerusalem's siege of the southeastern Nile Delta town of Bilbeis. He sent five letters to the Jewish communities of Lower Egypt asking them to pool money together to pay the ransom. The money was collected and then given to two judges sent to Palestine to negotiate with the Crusaders. The captives were eventually released.[23]
Death of his brother
[edit]
Following this success, the Maimonides family, hoping to increase their wealth, gave their savings to his brother, the youngest son David ben Maimon, a merchant. Maimonides directed his brother to procure goods only at the Sudanese port of ʿAydhab. After a long, arduous trip through the desert, however, David was unimpressed by the goods on offer there. Against his brother's wishes, David boarded a ship for India, since great wealth was to be found in the East.[i] Before he could reach his destination, David drowned at sea sometime between 1169 and 1177. The death of his brother caused Maimonides to become sick with grief.
In a letter discovered in the Cairo Geniza, he wrote:
The greatest misfortune that has befallen me during my entire life—worse than anything else—was the demise of the saint, may his memory be blessed, who drowned in the Indian sea, carrying much money belonging to me, to him, and to others, and left with me a little daughter and a widow. On the day I received that terrible news I fell ill and remained in bed for about a year, suffering from a sore boil, fever, and depression, and was almost given up. About eight years have passed, but I am still mourning and unable to accept consolation. And how should I console myself? He grew up on my knees, he was my brother, [and] he was my student.[24]
Nagid
[edit]
Around 1171, Maimonides was appointed the nagid of the Egyptian Jewish community.[21] Shelomo Dov Goitein believes the leadership he displayed during the ransoming of the Crusader captives led to this appointment.[25] However, he was replaced by Sar Shalom ben Moses in 1173. Over the controversial course of Sar Shalom's appointment, during which Sar Shalom was accused of tax farming, Maimonides excommunicated and fought with him for several years until Maimonides was appointed Nagid in 1195. Abraham bar Hillel wrote a scathing description of Sar Shalom in his Megillat Zutta while praising Maimonides as "the light of east and west and unique master and marvel of the generation."[26][27]
Physician
[edit]
With the loss of the family funds tied up in David's business venture, Maimonides assumed the vocation of physician, for which he was to become famous. He had trained in medicine in both Spain and in Fez. Gaining widespread recognition, he was appointed court physician to Qadi al-Fadil, the chief secretary to Sultan Saladin, then to Saladin himself; after whose death he remained a physician to the Ayyubid dynasty.[28]

In his medical writings, Maimonides described many conditions, including asthma, diabetes, hepatitis, and pneumonia, and he emphasized moderation and a healthy lifestyle.[30] His treatises became influential for generations of physicians. He was knowledgeable about Greek and Arabic medicine, and followed the principles of humorism in the tradition of Galen. He did not blindly accept authority but used his own observation and experience.[30] Julia Bess Frank indicates that Maimonides in his medical writings sought to interpret works of authorities so that they could become acceptable.[28] Maimonides displayed in his interactions with patients attributes that today would be called intercultural awareness and respect for the patient's autonomy.[31] Although he frequently wrote of his longing for solitude in order to come closer to God and to extend his reflections—elements considered essential in his philosophy to the prophetic experience—he gave over most of his time to caring for others.[32] In a famous letter, Maimonides describes his daily routine. After visiting the Sultan's palace, he would arrive home exhausted and hungry, where "I would find the antechambers filled with gentiles and Jews [...] I would go to heal them, and write prescriptions for their illnesses [...] until the evening [...] and I would be extremely weak."[33]
As he goes on to say in this letter, even on Shabbat he would receive members of the community. Still, he managed to write extended treatises, including not only medical and other scientific studies but some of the most systematically thought-through and influential treatises on halakha (rabbinic law) and Jewish philosophy of the Middle Ages.[j]
In 1172–74, Maimonides wrote his famous Epistle to Yemen.[34] It has been suggested that his "incessant travail" undermined his own health and brought about his death at 69 (although this is a normal lifespan).[35]
Death
[edit]
Maimonides died on 12 December 1204 (20th of Tevet 4965) in Fustat. A variety of medieval sources beginning with al-Qifti maintain that his body was interred near the Sea of Galilee, though there is no contemporary evidence for his removal from Egypt. Gedaliah ibn Yahya ben Joseph records that "He was buried in the Upper Galilee with elegies upon his gravestone. In the time of Kimhi, when the sons of Belial rose up to besmirch [Maimonides] . . . they did evil. They altered his gravestone, which previously had been inscribed 'choicest of the human race (מבחר המין האנושי)', so that instead it read 'the excommunicated heretic (מוחרם ומין)'. But later, after the provocateurs had repented of their act, and praised this great man, a student repaired the gravestone to read 'choicest of the Israelites (מבחר המין הישראלי)'".[36] Today, Tiberias hosts the Tomb of Maimonides, on which is inscribed "From Moses to Moses arose none like Moses."[37]
Maimonides and his wife, the daughter of Mishael ben Yeshayahu Halevi, had one child who survived into adulthood,[38] Abraham Maimonides, who became recognized as a great scholar, but his scholarship and career was overshadowed by his father's importance. He succeeded Maimonides as Nagid and as court physician at the age of eighteen. Throughout his career, he defended his father's writings against all critics, an. The office of Nagid was held by the Maimonides family for four successive generations, until the end of the 14th century.
A statue of Maimonides was erected near the Córdoba Synagogue.
Maimonides is sometimes said to be a descendant of David, although he never made such a claim.[39][40]
Works
[edit]Mishneh Torah
[edit]With Mishneh Torah, Maimonides composed a code of Jewish law with the widest-possible scope and depth. The work gathers all the binding laws from the Talmud, and incorporates the positions of the Geonim (post-Talmudic early medieval scholars, mainly from Mesopotamia). It is also known as Yad ha-Chazaka or simply Yad (יד) which has the numerical value 14, representing the 14 books of the work. The Mishneh Torah made following Jewish law easier for the Jews of his time, who were struggling to understand the complex nature of Jewish rules and regulations as they had adapted over the years.
Later codes of halakha such as the Arba'ah Turim of Jacob ben Asher and Shulchan Aruch of Joseph Karo draw heavily on Mishneh Torah; both often quote whole sections verbatim. However, it met initially with much opposition.[41] There were two main reasons for this opposition. First, Maimonides had refrained from adding references to his work for the sake of brevity; second, in the introduction, he gave the impression of wanting to "cut out" study of the Talmud,[42] to arrive at a conclusion in Jewish law, although Maimonides later wrote that this was not his intent. His most forceful opponents were the rabbis of Provence (Southern France), and a running critique by Abraham ben David (Raavad III) is printed in virtually all editions of Mishneh Torah. Nevertheless, Mishneh Torah was recognized as a monumental contribution to the systemized writing of halakha. Throughout the centuries, it has been widely studied and its halakhic decisions have weighed heavily in later rulings.
In response to those who would attempt to force followers of Maimonides and his Mishneh Torah to abide by the rulings of his own Shulchan Aruch or other later works, Joseph Karo wrote: "Who would dare force communities who follow the Rambam to follow any other decisor [of Jewish law], early or late? [...] The Rambam is the greatest of the decisors, and all the communities of the Land of Israel and the Arabistan and the Maghreb practice according to his word, and accepted him as their rabbi."[43]
An oft-cited legal maxim from his pen is: "It is better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death." He argued that executing a defendant on anything less than absolute certainty would lead to a slippery slope of decreasing burdens of proof, until defendants would be convicted merely according to the judge's caprice.[44]
Other Judaic and philosophical works
[edit]

Maimonides composed works of Jewish scholarship, rabbinic law, philosophy, and medical texts. Most of Maimonides' works were written in Judeo-Arabic. However, the Mishneh Torah was written in Hebrew. In addition to Mishneh Torah, his Jewish texts were:
- Commentary on the Mishna (Arabic Kitab al-Siraj, translated into Hebrew as Pirush Hamishnayot), written in Classical Arabic using the Hebrew alphabet. This was the first full commentary ever written on the entire Mishnah, which took Maimonides seven years to complete. It is considered one of the most important Mishnah commentaries, having enjoyed great popularity both in its Arabic original and its medieval Hebrew translation. The commentary includes three philosophical introductions which were also highly influential:
- The Introduction to the Mishnah deals with the nature of the oral law, the distinction between the prophet and the sage, and the organizational structure of the Mishnah.
- The Introduction to Mishnah Sanhedrin, chapter ten (Pereḳ Ḥeleḳ), is an eschatological essay that concludes with Maimonides' famous creed ("the thirteen principles of faith").
- The Introduction to Pirkei Avot, popularly called The Eight Chapters, is an ethical treatise.
- Sefer Hamitzvot (The Book of Commandments). In this work, Maimonides lists all the 613 mitzvot traditionally contained in the Torah (Pentateuch). He describes fourteen shorashim (roots or principles) to guide his selection.
- Sefer Ha'shamad (Letter of Martydom)
- The Guide for the Perplexed, a philosophical work harmonising and differentiating Aristotle's philosophy and Jewish theology. Written in Judeo-Arabic under the title Dalālat al-ḥāʾirīn, and completed between 1186 and 1190.[45][better source needed] It has been suggested that the title is derived from the Arabic phrase dalīl al-mutaḥayyirin (guide of the perplexed) a name for God in a work by al-Ghazālī, echoes of whose work can be found elsewhere in Maimonides.[46] The first translation of this work into Hebrew was done by Samuel ibn Tibbon in 1204 just prior to Maimonides' death.[47]
- Teshuvot, collected correspondence and responsa, including a number of public letters (on resurrection and the afterlife, on conversion to other faiths, and the Epistle to Yemen addressed to the oppressed Yemenite Jews).
- Hilkhot ha-Yerushalmi, a fragment of a commentary on the Jerusalem Talmud, identified and published by Saul Lieberman in 1947.
- Commentaries to the Babylonian Talmud, of which fragments survive.[48]
Medical works
[edit]Maimonides' achievements in the medical field are well known, and are cited by many medieval authors. One of his more important medical works is his Guide to Good Health (Regimen Sanitatis), which he composed in Arabic for the Sultan al-Afdal, son of Saladin, who suffered from depression.[49] The work was translated into Latin, and published in Florence in 1477, becoming the first medical book to appear in print there.[50] While his prescriptions may have become obsolete, "his ideas about preventive medicine, public hygiene, approach to the suffering patient, and the preservation of the health of the soul have not become obsolete."[51] Maimonides wrote ten known medical works in Arabic that have been translated by the Jewish medical ethicist Fred Rosner into contemporary English.[30][52] Lectures, conferences and research on Maimonides, even recently in the 21st century, have been done at medical universities in Morocco.
- Regimen Sanitatis, Suessmann Muntner (ed.), Mossad Harav Kook: Jerusalem 1963 (translated into Hebrew by Moshe Ibn Tibbon) (OCLC 729184001)
- The Art of Cure – Extracts from Galen (Barzel, 1992, Vol. 5)[53] is essentially an extract of Galen's extensive writings.
- Commentary on the Aphorisms of Hippocrates (Rosner, 1987, Vol. 2; Hebrew:[54] פירוש לפרקי אבוקראט) is interspersed with his own views.
- Medical Aphorisms[55] of Moses (Rosner, 1989, Vol. 3) titled Fusul Musa in Arabic ("Chapters of Moses", Hebrew:[56] פרקי משה) contains 1500 aphorisms and many medical conditions are described.
- Treatise on Hemorrhoids (in Rosner, 1984, Vol. 1; Hebrew:[57] ברפואת הטחורים) discusses also digestion and food.
- Treatise on Cohabitation (in Rosner, 1984, Vol. 1) contains recipes as aphrodisiacs and anti-aphrodisiacs.
- Treatise on Asthma (Rosner, 1994, Vol. 6)[58] discusses climates and diets and their effect on asthma and emphasizes the need for clean air.
- Treatise on Poisons and Their Antidotes (in Rosner, 1984, Vol. 1) is an early toxicology textbook that remained popular for centuries.
- Regimen of Health (in Rosner, 1990, Vol. 4; Hebrew:[59] הנהגת הבריאות) is a discourse on healthy living and the mind-body connection.
- Discourse on the Explanation of Fits advocates healthy living and the avoidance of overabundance.
- Glossary of Drug Names (Rosner, 1992, Vol. 7)[60] represents a pharmacopeia with 405 paragraphs with the names of drugs in Arabic, Greek, Syrian, Persian, Berber, and Spanish.
The Oath of Maimonides
[edit]The Oath of Maimonides is a document about the medical calling and recited as a substitute for the Hippocratic Oath. It is not to be confused with a more lengthy Prayer of Maimonides. These documents may not have been written by Maimonides, but later.[28] The Prayer appeared first in print in 1793 and has been attributed to Markus Herz, a German physician, pupil of Immanuel Kant.[61]
Treatise on logic
[edit]The Treatise on Logic (Arabic: Maqala Fi-Sinat Al-Mantiq) has been printed 17 times, including editions in Latin (1527), German (1805, 1822, 1833, 1828), French (1936) by Moïse Ventura and in 1996 by Rémi Brague, and English (1938) by Israel Efros, and in an abridged Hebrew form. The work illustrates the essentials of Aristotelian logic to be found in the teachings of the great Islamic philosophers such as Avicenna and, above all, Al-Farabi, "the Second Master," the "First Master" being Aristotle. In his work devoted to the Treatise, Rémi Brague stresses the fact that Al-Farabi is the only philosopher mentioned therein. This indicates a line of conduct for the reader, who must read the text keeping in mind Al-Farabi's works on logic. In the Hebrew versions, the Treatise is called The words of Logic which describes the bulk of the work. The author explains the technical meaning of the words used by logicians. The Treatise duly inventories the terms used by the logician and indicates what they refer to. The work proceeds rationally through a lexicon of philosophical terms to a summary of higher philosophical topics, in 14 chapters corresponding to Maimonides' birthdate of 14 Nissan. The number 14 recurs in many of Maimonides' works. Each chapter offers a cluster of associated notions. The meaning of the words is explained and illustrated with examples. At the end of each chapter, the author carefully draws up the list of words studied.
Until very recently, it was accepted that Maimonides wrote the Treatise on Logic in his twenties or even in his teen years.[62] Herbert Davidson has raised questions about Maimonides' authorship of this short work (and of other short works traditionally attributed to Maimonides). He maintains that Maimonides was not the author at all, based on a report of two Arabic-language manuscripts, unavailable to Western investigators in Asia Minor.[63] Yosef Qafih maintained that it is by Maimonides and newly translated it to Hebrew (as Beiur M'lekhet HaHiggayon) from the Judeo-Arabic.[64]
Philosophy
[edit]Through The Guide for the Perplexed and the philosophical introductions to sections of his commentaries on the Mishna, Maimonides exerted an important influence on the Scholastic philosophers, especially on Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotus. He was a Jewish Scholastic. Educated more by reading the works of Arab Muslim philosophers than by personal contact with Arabian teachers, he acquired an intimate acquaintance not only with Arab Muslim philosophy, but with the doctrines of Aristotle. Maimonides strove to reconcile Aristotelianism and science with the teachings of the Torah.[47] In his Guide for the Perplexed, he often explains the function and purpose of the statutory provisions contained in the Torah against the backdrop of the historical conditions. The book was highly controversial in its day, and was banned by French rabbis, who burnt copies of the work in Montpellier.[65]
Thirteen principles of faith
[edit]| Part of a series on |
| Jews and Judaism |
|---|
In his commentary on the Mishnah (Tractate Sanhedrin, chapter 10), Maimonides formulates his "13 principles of faith"; and that these principles summarized what he viewed as the required beliefs of Judaism:
- The existence of God.
- God's unity and indivisibility into elements.
- God's spirituality and incorporeality.
- God's eternity.
- God alone should be the object of worship.
- Revelation through God's prophets.
- The preeminence of Moses among the prophets.
- That the entire Torah (both the Written and Oral law) are of Divine origin and were dictated to Moses by God on Mt. Sinai.
- The Torah given by Moses is permanent and will not be replaced or changed.
- God's awareness of all human actions and thoughts.
- Reward of righteousness and punishment of evil.
- The coming of the Jewish Messiah.
- The resurrection of the dead.
Maimonides is said to have compiled the principles from various Talmudic sources. These principles were controversial when first proposed, evoking criticism by Rabbis Hasdai Crescas and Joseph Albo, and were effectively ignored by much of the Jewish community for the next few centuries.[66] However, these principles have become widely held and are considered to be the cardinal principles of faith for Orthodox Jews.[67] Two poetic restatements of these principles (Ani Ma'amin and Yigdal) eventually became canonized in many editions of the Siddur (Jewish prayer book).[68]
The omission of a list of these principles as such within his later works, the Mishneh Torah and The Guide for the Perplexed, has led some to suggest that either he retracted his earlier position, or that these principles are descriptive rather than prescriptive.[69][70][71][72][73]
Theology
[edit]
Maimonides equated the God of Abraham to what philosophers refer to as the Necessary Being. God is unique in the universe, and the Torah commands that one love and fear God (Deut 10:12) on account of that uniqueness. To Maimonides, this meant that one ought to contemplate God's works and to marvel at the order and wisdom that went into their creation. When one does this, one inevitably comes to love God and to sense how insignificant one is in comparison to God. This is the basis of the Torah.[74]
The principle that inspired his philosophical activity was identical to a fundamental tenet of scholasticism: there can be no contradiction between the truths which God has revealed and the findings of the human mind in science and philosophy. Maimonides primarily relied upon the science of Aristotle and the teachings of the Talmud, commonly claiming to find a basis for the latter in the former.[75]
Maimonides' admiration for the Neoplatonic commentators led him to doctrines which the later Scholastics did not accept. For instance, Maimonides was an adherent of apophatic theology. In this theology, one attempts to describe God through negative attributes. For example, one should not say that God exists in the usual sense of the term; it can be said that God is not non-existent. One should not say that "God is wise"; but it can be said that "God is not ignorant," i.e., in some way, God has some properties of knowledge. One should not say that "God is One," but it can be stated that "there is no multiplicity in God's being." In brief, the attempt is to gain and express knowledge of God by describing what God is not, rather than by describing what God "is."[76]
Maimonides argued adamantly that God is not corporeal. This was central to his thinking about the sin of idolatry. Maimonides insisted that all of the anthropomorphic phrases pertaining to God in sacred texts are to be interpreted metaphorically.[76] A related tenet of Maimonidean theology is the notion that the commandments, especially those pertaining to sacrifices, are intended to help wean the Israelites away from idolatry.[77]
Maimonides also argued that God embodied reason, intellect, science, and nature, and was omnipotent and indescribable.[78] He said that science, the growth of scientific fields, and discovery of the unknown by comprehension of nature was a way to appreciate God.[78]
Character development
[edit]| Part of a series on |
| Jewish philosophy |
|---|
Maimonides taught about the developing of one's moral character. Although his life predated the modern concept of a personality, Maimonides believed that each person has an innate disposition along an ethical and emotional spectrum. Although one's disposition is often determined by factors outside of one's control, human beings have free will to choose to behave in ways that build character.[79] He wrote, "One is obligated to conduct his affairs with others in a gentle and pleasing manner."[80] Maimonides advised that those with antisocial character traits should identify those traits and then make a conscious effort to behave in the opposite way. For example, an arrogant person should practice humility.[81] If the circumstances of one's environment are such that it is impossible to behave ethically, one must move to a new location.[82]
Prophecy
[edit]Maimonides agreed with "the Philosopher" (Aristotle) that the use of logic is the "right" way of thinking. He claimed that in order to understand how to know God, every human being must, by study, and meditation attain the degree of perfection required to reach the prophetic state. Despite his rationalistic approach, he does not explicitly reject the previous ideas (as portrayed, for example, by Yehuda Halevi in his Kuzari) that in order to become a prophet, God must intervene. Maimonides teaches that prophecy is the highest purpose of the most learned and refined individuals.
The problem of evil
[edit]Maimonides wrote on theodicy (the philosophical attempt to reconcile the existence of a God with the existence of evil). He took the premise that an omnipotent and good God exists.[83][84][85][86] In The Guide for the Perplexed, Maimonides writes that all the evil that exists within human beings stems from their individual attributes, while all good comes from a universally shared humanity (Guide 3:8). He says that there are people who are guided by higher purpose, and there are those who are guided by physicality and must strive to find the higher purpose with which to guide their actions.
To justify the existence of evil, assuming God is both omnipotent and omnibenevolent, Maimonides postulates that one who created something by causing its opposite not to exist is not the same as creating something that exists; so evil is merely the absence of good. God did not create evil, rather God created good, and evil exists where good is absent (Guide 3:10). Therefore, all good is divine invention, and evil both is not and comes secondarily.
Maimonides contests the common view that evil outweighs good in the world. He says that if one were to examine existence only in terms of humanity, then that person may observe evil to dominate good, but if one looks at the whole of the universe, then he sees good is significantly more common than evil (Guide 3:12). Man, he reasons, is too insignificant a figure in God's myriad works to be their primary characterizing force, and so when people see mostly evil in their lives, they are not taking into account the extent of positive Creation outside of themselves.
Maimonides believes that there are three types of evil in the world: evil caused by nature, evil that people bring upon others, and evil man brings upon himself (Guide 3:12). The first type of evil Maimonides states is the rarest form, but arguably of the most necessary—the balance of life and death in both the human and animal worlds itself, he recognizes, is essential to God's plan. Maimonides writes that the second type of evil is relatively rare, and that humanity brings it upon itself. The third type of evil humans bring upon themselves and is the source of most of the ills of the world. These are the result of people's falling victim to their physical desires. To prevent the majority of evil which stems from harm one does to oneself, one must learn how to respond to one's bodily urges.
Skepticism of astrology
[edit]Maimonides answered an inquiry concerning astrology, addressed to him from Marseille.[87] He responded that man should believe only what can be supported either by rational proof, by the evidence of the senses, or by trustworthy authority. He affirms that he had studied astrology, and that it does not deserve to be described as a science. He ridicules the concept that the fate of a man could be dependent upon the constellations; he argues that such a theory would rob life of purpose, and would make man a slave of destiny.[88]
Unlike some of his contemporaries, Maimonides did not believe that Greek knowledge had originated with the Jews originally, but he does believe that the sages and Solomon knew science and philosophy, however he does not believe those books have survived down to his time. He notes that rabbinical knowledge of mathematics was imperfect because it was learned from contemporary men of science, and not divinely inspired prophecy.[89]
True beliefs versus necessary beliefs
[edit]In The Guide for the Perplexed Book III, Chapter 28,[90] Maimonides draws a distinction between "true beliefs," which were beliefs about God that produced intellectual perfection, and "necessary beliefs," which were conducive to improving social order. Maimonides places anthropomorphic personification statements about God in the latter class. He uses as an example the notion that God becomes "angry" with people who do wrong. In the view of Maimonides (taken from Avicenna), God does not become angry with people, as God has no human passions; but it is important for them to believe God does, so that they desist from doing wrong.
Righteousness and charity
[edit]Maimonides conceived of an eight-level hierarchy of tzedakah, where the highest form is to give a gift, loan, or partnership that will result in the recipient becoming self-sufficient instead of living upon others. In his view, the lowest form of tzedakah is to give begrudgingly.[91] The eight levels are:[92]
- Giving begrudgingly
- Giving less than you should, but giving it cheerfully
- Giving after being asked
- Giving before being asked
- Giving when you do not know the recipient's identity, but the recipient knows your identity
- Giving when you know the recipient's identity, but the recipient doesn't know your identity
- Giving when neither party knows the other's identity
- Enabling the recipient to become self-reliant
Eschatology
[edit]The Messianic era
[edit]Perhaps one of Maimonides' most highly acclaimed and renowned writings is his treatise on the Messianic era, written originally in Judeo-Arabic and which he elaborates on in great detail in his Commentary on the Mishnah (Introduction to the 10th chapter of tractate Sanhedrin, also known as Pereḳ Ḥeleḳ).
Resurrection
[edit]Religious Jews believed in immortality in a spiritual sense, and most believed that the future would include a messianic era and a resurrection of the dead. This is the subject of Jewish eschatology. Maimonides wrote much on this topic, but in most cases he wrote about the immortality of the soul for people of perfected intellect; his writings were usually not about the resurrection of dead bodies. Rabbis of his day were critical of this aspect of this thought, and there was controversy over his true views.[k]
Eventually, Maimonides felt pressured to write a treatise on the subject, known as "The Treatise on Resurrection." In it, he wrote that those who claimed that he believed the verses of the Hebrew Bible referring to the resurrection were only allegorical were spreading falsehoods. Maimonides asserts that belief in resurrection is a fundamental truth of Judaism about which there is no disagreement.[93]
While his position on the World to Come (non-corporeal eternal life as described above) may be seen as being in contradiction with his position on bodily resurrection, Maimonides resolved them with a then unique solution: Maimonides believed that the resurrection was not permanent or general. In his view, God never violates the laws of nature. Rather, divine interaction is by way of angels, whom Maimonides often regards to be metaphors for the laws of nature, the principles by which the physical universe operates, or Platonic eternal forms.[l] Thus, if a unique event actually occurs, even if it is perceived as a miracle, it is not a violation of the world's order.[94]
In this view, any dead who are resurrected must eventually die again. In his discussion of the 13 principles of faith, the first five deal with knowledge of God, the next four deal with prophecy and the Torah, while the last four deal with reward, punishment and the ultimate redemption. In this discussion Maimonides says nothing of a universal resurrection. All he says it is that whatever resurrection does take place, it will occur at an indeterminate time before the world to come, which he repeatedly states will be purely spiritual.
The World to Come
[edit]Maimonides distinguishes two kinds of intelligence in man, the one material in the sense of being dependent on, and influenced by, the body, and the other immaterial, that is, independent of the bodily organism. The latter is a direct emanation from the universal active intellect; this is his interpretation of the noûs poietikós of Aristotelian philosophy. It is acquired as the result of the efforts of the soul to attain a correct knowledge of the absolute, pure intelligence of God.[citation needed]
The knowledge of God is a form of knowledge which develops in us the immaterial intelligence, and thus confers on man an immaterial, spiritual nature. This confers on the soul that perfection in which human happiness consists, and endows the soul with immortality. One who has attained a correct knowledge of God has reached a condition of existence, which renders him immune from all the accidents of fortune, from all the allurements of sin, and from death itself. Man is in a position to work out his own salvation and his immortality.[citation needed]
Baruch Spinoza's doctrine of immortality was strikingly similar. However, Spinoza teaches that the way to attain the knowledge which confers immortality is the progress from sense-knowledge through scientific knowledge to philosophical intuition of all things sub specie æternitatis, while Maimonides holds that the road to perfection and immortality is the path of duty as described in the Torah and the rabbinic understanding of the oral law.[citation needed]
Maimonides describes the world to come as the stage after a person lives their life in this world as well as the final state of existence after the Messianic Era. Some time after the resurrection of the dead, souls will live forever without bodies. They will enjoy the radiance of the Divine Presence without the need for food, drink or sexual pleasures.[95]
Maimonides and Kabbalah
[edit]Maimonides was not known as a supporter of Kabbalah, although a strong intellectual type of mysticism has been discerned in his philosophy.[96] In The Guide for the Perplexed, Maimonides declares his intention to conceal from the average reader his explanations of Sod[m] esoteric meanings of Torah. The nature of these "secrets" is debated. Religious Jewish rationalists, and the mainstream academic view, read Maimonides' Aristotelianism as a mutually-exclusive alternative metaphysics to Kabbalah.[97] Some academics hold that Maimonides' project fought against the Proto-Kabbalah of his time.[98]
Maimonides employed rationalism to defend Judaism rather than limit inquiry of Sod only to rationalism. His rationalism, if not taken as an opposition,[n] also assisted the Kabbalists, purifying their transmitted teaching from mistaken corporeal interpretations that could have been made from Hekhalot literature,[o] though Kabbalists held that their theosophy alone allowed human access to Divine mysteries.[99]
Influence and legacy
[edit]
Maimonides' Mishneh Torah is considered by Jews even today as one of the chief authoritative codifications of Jewish law and ethics. It is exceptional for its logical construction, concise and clear expression and extraordinary learning, so that it became a standard against which other later codifications were often measured.[100] It is still closely studied in rabbinic yeshivot (seminaries). The first to compile a comprehensive lexicon containing an alphabetically arranged list of difficult words found in Maimonides' Mishneh Torah was Tanḥum ha-Yerushalmi (1220–1291).[101] A popular medieval saying that also served as his epitaph states, "From Mosheh [of the Torah] to Mosheh [Maimonides] there was none like Mosheh." It chiefly referred to his rabbinic writings.
However, Maimonides was also one of the most influential figures in medieval Jewish philosophy. His adaptation of Aristotelian thought to Biblical faith deeply impressed later Jewish thinkers, and had an unexpected immediate historical impact.[102] Some more acculturated Jews in the century that followed his death, particularly in Spain, sought to apply Maimonides' Aristotelianism in ways that undercut traditionalist belief and observance, giving rise to an intellectual controversy in Spanish and southern French Jewish circles.[103] The intensity of debate spurred Catholic Church interventions against "heresy" and a general confiscation of rabbinic texts.
In reaction, the more radical interpretations of Maimonides were defeated. At least amongst Ashkenazi Jews, there was a tendency to ignore his specifically philosophical writings and to stress instead the rabbinic and halakhic writings. These writings often included considerable philosophical chapters or discussions in support of halakhic observance; David Hartman observes that Maimonides clearly expressed "the traditional support for a philosophical understanding of God both in the Aggadah of Talmud and in the behavior of the hasid [the pious Jew]."[104] Maimonidean thought continues to influence traditionally observant Jews.[105][106]
The most rigorous medieval critique of Maimonides is Hasdai Crescas' Or Adonai. Crescas bucked the eclectic trend, by demolishing the certainty of the Aristotelian world-view, not only in religious matters but also in the most basic areas of medieval science (such as physics and geometry). Crescas' critique provoked a number of 15th-century scholars to write defenses of Maimonides.
Because of his path-finding synthesis of Aristotle and Biblical faith, Maimonides had an influence on Christian theologian Thomas Aquinas who refers to Maimonides in several of his works, including the Commentary on the Sentences.[107]
Maimonides' combined abilities in the fields of theology, philosophy and medicine make his work attractive today as a source during discussions of evolving norms in these fields, particularly medicine. An example is the modern citation of his method of determining death of the body in the controversy regarding declaration of death to permit organ donation for transplantation.[108]
Maimonides and the Modernists
[edit]
Maimonides remains one of the most widely debated Jewish thinkers among modern scholars. He has been adopted as a symbol and an intellectual hero by almost all major movements in modern Judaism, and has proven important to philosophers such as Leo Strauss; and his views on the importance of humility have been taken up by modern humanist philosophers. In academia, particularly within the area of Jewish Studies, the teaching of Maimonides has been dominated by traditional scholars, generally Orthodox, who place a very strong emphasis on Maimonides as a rationalist; one result is that certain sides of Maimonides' thought, including his opposition to anthropocentrism, have been obviated.[citation needed] There are movements in some postmodern circles to claim Maimonides for other purposes, as within the discourse of ecotheology.[109] Maimonides' reconciliation of the philosophical and the traditional has given his legacy an extremely diverse and dynamic quality.
Tributes and memorials
[edit]
Maimonides has been memorialized in numerous ways. For example, one of the Learning Communities at the Tufts University School of Medicine bears his name. There is also Maimonides School in Brookline, Massachusetts, Maimonides Academy School in Los Angeles, California, Lycée Maïmonide in Casablanca, the Brauser Maimonides Academy in Hollywood, Florida,[110] and Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York. Beit Harambam Congregation, a Sephardi synagogue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is named after him.[111]
Issued from 8 May 1986 to 1995,[112] the Series A of the Israeli New Shekel featured an illustration of Maimonides on the obverse and the place of his burial in Tiberias on the reverse on its 1-shekel bill.[113]
In 2004, conferences were held at Yale University, Florida International University, Penn State, and Rambam Hospital in Haifa, Israel, which is named after him. To commemorate the 800th anniversary of his death, Harvard University issued a memorial volume.[114] In 1953, the Israel Postal Authority issued a postage stamp of Maimonides, pictured.
In March 2008, during the Euromed Conference of Ministers of Tourism, The Tourism Ministries of Israel, Morocco and Spain agreed to work together on a joint project that will trace the footsteps of the Rambam and thus boost religious tourism in the cities of Córdoba, Fez and Tiberias.[115]
Between December 2018 and January 2019 the Israel Museum held a special exhibit dedicated to the writings of Maimonides.[116]
Burial place
[edit]
He is buried in Tomb of Maimonides in Tiberias. Other notable rabbis also buried in this complex are Isaiah Horowitz, Eliezer ben Hurcanus, Yohanan ben Zakkai, and Joshua ben Hananiah
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Hebrew: מֹשֶׁה בֶּן־מַיְמוֹן, romanized: Moše ben Maymon; Arabic: موسى بن ميمون, romanized: Mūsā ibm Maymūn, both meaning "Moses, son of Maimon"
- ^ Ancient Greek: Μωυσής Μαϊμωνίδης, romanized: Mōusḗs Maïmōnídēs; Latin: Moses Maimonides
- ^ /ˌrɑːmˈbɑːm/, for Rabbēnu Mōše ben Maymōn, "Our Rabbi Moses, son of Maimon"
- ^ The date of 1138 of the Common Era is the date of birth given by Maimonides himself, in the very last chapter and comment made by Maimonides in his Commentary of the Mishnah,[5] and where he writes: "I began to write this composition when I was twenty-three years old, and I completed it in Egypt while I was aged thirty, which year is the 1,479th year of the Seleucid era (1168 CE)."
- ^ Medieval Jews named Moses received the Arabic nickname abu Imran, in which the word abu has been inverted from its original sense of "father" to reference the biblical Moses' father Amram. Similarly, Jews named Isaac were known as abu Ibrahim, meaning: "son of Abraham". For more on the Jewish system of biblical nicknames, see Kunya.
- ^ Ubaydallah is to be treated as Maimonides' surname; his grandfather was named Joseph. It is not always included in either Arabic or Hebrew versions of Maimonides' name. Various Hebrew manuscripts render ben Ovadyahu and ben Eved-Elohim ("descended/son of Obadiah"), but also Eved-Elohim, implying only "Moses son of Maimon, the servant of God" (cf. Josh. 1:13–15) and Latin versions follow, rendering servus dei. See: Bar-Sela A, Hoff HE, Faris E, Maimonides M (1964). "Moses Maimonides' Two Treatises on the Regimen of Health: Fi Tadbir al-Sihhah and Maqalah fi Bayan Ba'd al-A'rad wa-al-Jawab 'anha". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. 54 (4). JSTOR: 3. doi:10.2307/1005935. ISSN 0065-9746. JSTOR 1005935.
- ^ a b He usually left off "the Spaniard" and he sometimes added זצ״ל, short for "[let] mention of the righteous one bring a blessing." At the end of his commentary to the Mishna, he gives a fuller lineage: אני משה ברבי מימון הדיין ברבי יוסף החכם ברבי יצחק הדיין ברבי יוסף הדיין ברבי עובדיהו הדיין ברבי שלמה הרב ברבי עובדיהו הדיין זכר קדושים לברכה, "I am Moshe son of Rabbi Maimon the Judge, son of Rabbi Joseph the Wise, son of Rabbi Isaac the Judge, son of Rabbi Joseph the Judge, son of Rabbi Obadiah the Judge, son of Rabbi Solomon the Teacher, son of Rabbi Obadiah the Judge; [let] mention of the holy ones bring a blessing."
- ^ Seder HaDoroth (year 4927) quotes Maimonides as saying that he began writing his commentary on the Mishna when he was 23 years old, and published it when he was 30. Because of the dispute about the date of Maimonides' birth, it is not clear which year the work was published.
- ^ The "India Trade" (a term devised by the Arabist S.D. Goitein) was a highly lucrative business venture in which Jewish merchants from Egypt, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East imported and exported goods ranging from pepper to brass from various ports along the Malabar Coast between the 11th–13th centuries. For more info, see the "India Traders" chapter in Goitein, Letters of Medieval Jewish Traders, 1973 or Goitein, India Traders of the Middle Ages, 2008.
- ^ Such views of his works are found in almost all scholarly studies of the man and his significance. See, for example, the "Introduction" sub-chapter by Howard Kreisel to his overview article "Moses Maimonides", in History of Jewish Philosophy, edited by Daniel H. Frank and Oliver Leaman, Second Edition (New York and London: Routledge, 2003), pp. 245–246.
- ^ According to Maimonides, certain Jews in Yemen had sent to him a letter in the year 1189, evidently irritated as to why he had not mentioned the physical resurrection of the dead in his Hil. Teshuvah, chapter 8, and how some persons in Yemen had begun to instruct, based on Maimonides' teaching, that when the body dies, it will disintegrate and the soul will never return to such bodies after death. Maimonides denied that he ever insinuated such things, and reiterated that the body would indeed resurrect, but that the "world to come" was something different in nature. See: Maimonides' Ma'amar Teḥayyath Hamethim (Treatise on the Resurrection of the Dead), published in Book of Letters and Responsa (ספר אגרות ותשובות), Jerusalem 1978, p. 9 (Hebrew).
- ^ This view is not always consistent throughout Maimonides' work; in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, chapters 2–4, Maimonides describes angels that are actually created beings.
- ^ "Within [the Torah] there is also another part which is called 'hidden' (mutsnaʿ), and this [concerns] the secrets (sodot) which the human intellect cannot attain, like the meanings of the statutes (ḥukim) and other hidden secrets. They can neither be attained through the intellect nor through sheer volition, but they are revealed before Him who created [the Torah]". (Abraham ben Asher, The Or ha-Sekhel)
- ^ Contemporary academic views in the study of Jewish mysticism, hold that 12–13th century Kabbalists wrote down and systemised their transmitted oral doctrines in oppositional response to Maimonidean rationalism. See e.g. Moshe Idel, Kabbalah: New Perspectives
- ^ The first comprehensive systemiser of Kabbalah, Moses ben Jacob Cordovero, for example, was influenced by Maimonides. One example is his instruction to undercut any conception of a Kabbalistic idea after grasping it in the mind. One's intellect runs to God in learning the idea, then returns in qualified rejection of false spatial/temporal conceptions of the idea's truth, as the human mind can only think in material references. Cited in Louis Jacobs, The Jewish Religion: A Companion, Oxford University Press, 1995, entry on Cordovero.
References
[edit]- ^ Schwartz Y (31 July 2011). "The Maimonides Portrait: An Appraisal of One of the World's Most Famous Pictures". Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal. 2 (3) e0052. doi:10.5041/RMMJ.10052. ISSN 2076-9172. PMC 3678793. PMID 23908810.
- ^ "Moses Maimonides | Biography, Philosophy, & Teachings". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2016.
- ^ "Hebrew Date Converter – 14th of Nisan, 4895". Hebcal Jewish Calendar. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ^ "Hebrew Date Converter – 14th of Nisan, 4898". Hebcal Jewish Calendar. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ^ Commentary of the Mishnah, Maimonides (1967), s.v. Uktzin 3:12 (end)
- ^ Joel E. Kramer, "Moses Maimonides: An Intellectual Portrait", p. 47 note 1. In Kenneth Seeskin, ed. (September 2005). The Cambridge Companion to Maimonides. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52578-7.
- ^ 1138 in Stroumsa, Maimonides in His World: Portrait of a Mediterranean Thinker, Princeton University Press, 2009, p. 8
- ^ Sherwin B. Nuland (2008), Maimonides, Random House LLC, p. 38
- ^ Marder M (11 November 2014). The Philosopher's Plant: An Intellectual Herbarium. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-231-53813-8. Archived from the original on 17 July 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
- ^ Kraemer 2008, p. 12.
- ^ Joel L. Kraemer, Maimonides:The Life and World of One of Civilization's Greatest Minds, Crown Publishing Group 2008 ISBN 978-0-385-52851-1 p.486 n.6.
- ^ "Iggerot HaRambam, Iggeret Teiman". sefaria.org. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ^ Stroumsa, Maimonides in His World: Portrait of a Mediterranean Thinker, Princeton University Press, 2009, p.65
- ^ a b 1954 Encyclopedia Americana, vol. 18, p. 140.
- ^ Touri A, Benaboud M, Boujibar El-Khatib N, Lakhdar K, Mezzine M (2010). Andalusian Morocco: A Discovery in Living Art (2 ed.). Ministry of Cultural Affairs of the Kingdom of Morocco & Museum With No Frontiers. ISBN 978-3-902782-31-1.
- ^ Y. K. Stillman, ed. (1984). "Libās". Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. 5 (2nd ed.). Brill Academic Publishers. p. 744. ISBN 978-90-04-09419-2.
- ^ See for example: Solomon Zeitlin, "MAIMONIDES", The American Jewish Year Book, Vol. 37, pp 65 – 66. Archived 25 December 2021 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Davidson, p. 28.
- ^ Davidson HA (2005). Moses Maimonides: The Man and His Works. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-517321-5.
- ^ Kraemer JL (1 January 1991). Perspectives on Maimonides: Philosophical and Historical Studies. Liverpool University Press. ISBN 978-1-909821-43-9.
- ^ a b Goitein, S.D. Letters of Medieval Jewish Traders, Princeton University Press, 1973 (ISBN 0-691-05212-3), p. 208
- ^ Loewenberg M (October–November 2012). "No Jew had been permitted to enter the holy city which has become a Christian bastion since the Crusaders conquered it in 1096". Jewish Magazine. Archived from the original on 3 November 2018. Retrieved 9 February 2018.
- ^ Cohen, Mark R. Poverty and Charity in the Jewish Community of Medieval Egypt. Princeton University Press, 2005 (ISBN 0-691-09272-9), pp. 115–116
- ^ Goitein, Letters of Medieval Jewish Traders, p. 207
- ^ Cohen, Poverty and Charity in the Jewish Community of Medieval Egypt, p. 115
- ^ Baron SW (1952). A Social and Religious History of the Jews: High Middle Ages, 500–1200. Columbia University Press. p. 215. ISBN 978-0-231-08843-5. Archived from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Rustow M (1 October 2010). "Sar Shalom ben Moses ha-Levi". Encyclopedia of Jews in the Islamic World. Archived from the original on 18 June 2020. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
- ^ a b c Julia Bess Frank (1981). "Moses Maimonides: rabbi or medicine". The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 54 (1): 79–88. PMC 2595894. PMID 7018097.
- ^ Schmierer-Lee M (12 October 2022). "Q&A Wednesday: Maimonides, hiding in plain sight, with José Martínez Delgado". lib.cam.ac.uk. Retrieved 31 May 2023.
- ^ a b c Fred Rosner (2002). "The Life of Moses Maimonides, a Prominent Medieval Physician" (PDF). Einstein Quart J Biol Med. 19 (3): 125–128. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2009. Retrieved 14 January 2009.
- ^ Gesundheit B, Or R, Gamliel C, Rosner F, Steinberg A (April 2008). "Treatment of depression by Maimonides (1138–1204): Rabbi, Physician, and Philosopher" (PDF). Am J Psychiatry. 165 (4): 425–428. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101575. PMID 18381913. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2009.
- ^ Abraham Heschel, Maimonides (New York: Farrar Straus, 1982), Chapter 15, "Meditation on God," pp. 157–162, and also pp. 178–180, 184–185, 204, etc. Isadore Twersky, editor, A Maimonides Reader (New York: Behrman House, 1972), commences his "Introduction" with the following remarks, p. 1: "Maimonides' biography immediately suggests a profound paradox. A philosopher by temperament and ideology, a zealous devotee of the contemplative life who eloquently portrayed and yearned for the serenity of solitude and the spiritual exuberance of meditation, he nevertheless led a relentlessly active life that regularly brought him to the brink of exhaustion."
- ^ Responsa Pe'er HaDor, 143.
- ^ Click to see full English translation of Maimonides' "Epistle to Yemen"
- ^ The comment on the effect of his "incessant travail" on his health is by Salo Baron, "Moses Maimonides", in Great Jewish Personalities in Ancient and Medieval Time, edited by Simon Noveck (B'nai B'rith Department of Adult Jewish Education, 1959), p. 227, where Baron also quotes from Maimonides' letter to Ibn Tibbon regarding his daily regime.
- ^ Shalshelet haQabbalah (Venice, 1587) f. 33b, MS Guenzberg 652 f. 76a.
- ^ "Maimonides". he.chabad.org (in Hebrew). Archived from the original on 1 August 2021. Retrieved 2 August 2021.
- ^ אגרות הרמב"ם מהדורת שילת
- ^ Sarah E. Karesh, Mitchell M. Hurvitz (2005). Encyclopedia of Judaism. Facts on File. p. 305. ISBN 978-0-8160-5457-2. Archived from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
- ^ H. J. Zimmels (1997). Ashkenazim and Sephardim: Their Relations, Differences, and Problems as Reflected in the Rabbinical Responsa (Revised ed.). Ktav Publishing House. p. 283. ISBN 978-0-88125-491-4. Archived from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
- ^ Siegelbaum CB (2010). Women at the Crossroads: A Woman's Perspective on the Weekly Torah Portion. Chana Bracha Siegelbaum. p. 199. ISBN 978-1-936068-09-8.
- ^ Last section of Maimonides' Introduction to Mishneh Torah
- ^ Karo J. Questions & Responsa Avqat Rokhel אבקת רוכל (in Hebrew). responsum # 32. Retrieved 31 August 2023. (first printed in Saloniki 1791)
- ^ Moses Maimonides, The Commandments, Neg. Comm. 290, at 269–71 (Charles B. Chavel trans., 1967).
- ^ Kehot Publication Society, Chabad.org.
- ^ Sarah Stroumsa, Maimonides in His World: Portrait of a Mediterranean Thinker, Princeton University Press 2011 ISBN 978-0-691-15252-3 p.25
- ^ a b "The Guide to the Perplexed". World Digital Library. Archived from the original on 23 July 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2013.
- ^ Published here; see discussion here.
- ^ Maimonides (1963), Introduction, p. XIV
- ^ Maimonides (1963), Preface, p. VI
- ^ Maimonides (1963), Preface, p. VII
- ^ Volume 5 translated by Barzel (foreword by Rosner).
- ^ Title page, TOC.
- ^ "כתבים רפואיים – ג (פירוש לפרקי אבוקראט) / משה בן מימון (רמב"ם) / ת"ש-תש"ב – אוצר החכמה". Archived from the original on 21 June 2016. Retrieved 19 July 2016.
- ^ Maimonides. Medical Aphorisms (Treatises 1–5 6–9 10–15 16–21 22–25), Brigham Young University, Provo – Utah
- ^ "כתבים רפואיים – ב (פרקי משה ברפואה) / משה בן מימון (רמב"ם) / ת"ש-תש"ב – אוצר החכמה". Archived from the original on 21 June 2016. Retrieved 19 July 2016.
- ^ "כתבים רפואיים – ד (ברפואת הטחורים) / משה בן מימון (רמב"ם) / ת"ש-תש"ב – אוצר החכמה". Archived from the original on 21 June 2016. Retrieved 19 July 2016.
- ^ Title page, TOC.
- ^ "כתבים רפואיים – א (הנהגת הבריאות) / משה בן מימון (רמב"ם) / ת"ש-תש"ב – אוצר החכמה". Archived from the original on 29 June 2016. Retrieved 19 July 2016.
- ^ Title page, TOC.
- ^ "Oath and Prayer of Maimonides". Library.dal.ca. Archived from the original on 29 June 2008. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
- ^ Abraham Heschel, Maimonides. New York: Farrar Straus, 1982 p. 22 ("at sixteen")
- ^ Davidson, pp. 313 ff.
- ^ "באור מלאכת ההגיון / משה בן מימון (רמב"ם) / תשנ"ז – אוצר החכמה". Archived from the original on 21 June 2016. Retrieved 19 July 2016.
- ^ Jonathan Klawans, Purity, Sacrifice, and the Temple: Symbolism and Supersessionism in the Study of Ancient Judaism, Oxford University Press, 2009 ISBN 978-0-195-39584-6 p.8.
- ^ Dogma in Medieval Jewish Thought, Menachem Kellner
- ^ See, for example: Marc B. Shapiro. The Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides' Thirteen Principles Reappraised. Littman Library of Jewish Civilization (2011). pp. 1–14.
- ^ e.g. "Siddur Edot HaMizrach 2C, Additions for Shacharit: Thirteen Principles of Faith". sefaria.org. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
- ^ Landau R (1884). Sefer Degel Mahaneh Reuven (in Hebrew). Chernovitsi. OCLC 233297464. Archived from the original on 5 August 2021. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
- ^ Brown J (2008). "Rabbi Reuven Landau and the Jewish Reaction to Copernican Thought in Nineteenth Century Europe". The Torah U-Madda Journal. 15 (2008). Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, an affiliate of Yeshiva University: 112–142. JSTOR 40914730.
- ^ Shapiro MB (1993). "Maimonides' Thirteen Principles: The Last Word in Jewish Theology?". The Torah U-Madda Journal. 4 (1993). Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, an affiliate of Yeshiva University: 187–242. JSTOR 40914883.
- ^ Levy DB. "Book Review: New Heavens and a New Earth: The Jewish Reception of Copernican Thought". touroscholar.touro.edu. 8(1) (2015). Journal of Jewish Identities: 218–220. Archived from the original on 11 July 2020. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
- ^ Brown J (2013). New Heavens and a New Earth: The Jewish Reception of Copernican Thought. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199754793.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-975479-3.
- ^ Kraemer, 326-8
- ^ Kraemer, 66
- ^ a b Robinson, George. "Maimonides' Conception of God/" Archived 1 May 2018 at the Wayback Machine My Jewish Learning. 30 April 2018.
- ^ Reuven Chaim Klein, "Weaning Away from Idolatry: Maimonides on the Purpose of Ritual Sacrifices Archived 2021-10-29 at the Wayback Machine", Religions 12(5), 363.
- ^ a b Falcon T, Blatner D (2019). Judaism for Dummies (2nd ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 25, 27, 30–31. ISBN 978-1-119-64307-4. OCLC 1120116712.
- ^ Telushkin, 29
- ^ Commentary on The Ethics of the Fathers 1:15. Qtd. in Telushkin, 115
- ^ Kraemer, 332-4
- ^ MT De'ot 6:1
- ^ Moses Maimonides (2007). The Guide to the Perplexed. BN Publishers.
- ^ Joseph Jacobs. "Moses Ben Maimon". Jewish Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 23 May 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2011.
- ^ Shlomo Pines (2006). "Maimonides (1135–1204)". Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 5: 647–654.
- ^ Isadore Twersky (2005). "Maimonides, Moses". Encyclopedia of Religion. 8: 5613–5618.
- ^ Joel E. Kramer, "Moses Maimonides: An Intellectual Portrait," p. 45. In Kenneth Seeskin, ed. (September 2005). The Cambridge Companion to Maimonides. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52578-7.
- ^ Rudavsky T (March 2010). Maimonidies. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-4051-4898-6.
- ^ Fuss AM (1994). "The Study of Science and Philosophy Justified by Jewish Tradition". The Torah U-Madda Journal. 5: 101–114. ISSN 1050-4745. JSTOR 40914819.
- ^ "Guide for the Perplexed, on". Sacred-texts.com. Archived from the original on 14 April 2010. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
- ^ "Maimonides' Eight Levels of Charity". Retrieved 11 March 2023.
- ^ "Maimonides Eight Degrees of Tzedakah" (PDF). Jewish Teen Funders Network. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
- ^ Kraemer, 422
- ^ Commentary on the Mishna, Avot 5:6
- ^ "Mishneh Torah, Repentance 9:1". sefaria.org. Archived from the original on 1 August 2021. Retrieved 2 August 2021.
- ^ Abraham Heschel, Maimonides (New York: Farrar Straus, 1982), Chapter 15, "Meditation on God," pp. 157–162.
- ^ Such as the first (religious) criticism of Kabbalah, Ari Nohem, by Leon Modena from 1639. In it, Modena urges a return to Maimonidean Aristotelianism. The Scandal of Kabbalah: Leon Modena, Jewish Mysticism, Early Modern Venice, Yaacob Dweck, Princeton University Press, 2011.
- ^ Menachem Kellner, Maimonides' Confrontation With Mysticism, Littman Library, 2006
- ^ Norman Lamm, The Religious Thought of Hasidism: Text and Commentary, Ktav Pub, 1999: Introduction to chapter on Faith/Reason has historical overview of religious reasons for opposition to Jewish philosophy, including the Ontological reason, one Medieval Kabbalist holding that "we begin where they end".
- ^ Isidore Twersky, Introduction to the Code of Maimonides (Mishneh Torah), Yale Judaica Series, vol. XII (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1980), passim, and especially Chapter VII, "Epilogue," pp. 515–38.
- ^ Reif SC (1994). Jesus Pelaez del Rosal (ed.). "Review of 'Sobre la Vida y Obra de Maimonides'". Journal of Semitic Studies. 39 (1): 124. doi:10.1093/jss/XXXIX.1.123.
- ^ This is covered in all histories of the Jews. E.g., including such a brief overview as Cecil Roth, A History of the Jews, Revised Edition (New York: Schocken, 1970), pp. 175–179.
- ^ D.J. Silver, Maimonidean Criticism and the Maimonidean Controversy, 1180–1240 (Leiden: Brill, 1965), is still the most detailed account.
- ^ David Hartman, Maimonides: Torah and Philosophic Quest (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1976), p. 98.
- ^ On the extensive philosophical aspects of Maimonides' halakhic works, see in particular Isidore Twersky's Introduction to the Code of Maimonides (Mishneh Torah), Yale Judaica Series, vol. XII (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1980). Twersky devotes a major portion of this authoritative study to the philosophical aspects of the Mishneh Torah itself.
- ^ The Maimunist or Maimonidean controversy is covered in all histories of Jewish philosophy and general histories of the Jews. For an overview, with bibliographic references, see Idit Dobbs-Weinstein, "The Maimonidean Controversy," in History of Jewish Philosophy, Second Edition, edited by Daniel H. Frank and Oliver Leaman (London and New York: Routledge, 2003), pp. 331–349. Also see Colette Sirat, A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 205–272.
- ^ Mercedes Rubio (2006). "Aquinas and Maimonides on the Divine Names". Aquinas and Maimonides on the possibility of the knowledge of god. Springer-Verlag. pp. 11, 65–126, 211, 218. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4747-9_2. ISBN 978-1-4020-4720-6.
- ^ Vivian McAlister, Maimonides's cooling period and organ retrieval (Canadian Journal of Surgery 2004; 47: 8 – 9)
- ^ "NeoHasid.org | Rambam and Gaia". neohasid.org. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
- ^ David Morris. "Major Grant Awarded to Maimonides". Florida Jewish Journal. Archived from the original on 30 July 2007. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
- ^ Eisner J (1 June 2000). "Fear meets fellowship". The Philadelphia Inquirer. p. 25. Archived from the original on 23 November 2020. Retrieved 29 August 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "1 Israeli New Shekel (Rabbi Moses Maimonides) – exchange yours". Leftover Currency.
- ^ Linzmayer O (2012). "Israel". The Banknote Book. San Francisco, CA: BanknoteNews.com. Archived from the original on 29 August 2012. Retrieved 25 December 2021.
- ^ "Harvard University Press: Maimonides after 800 Years: Essays on Maimonides and his Influence by Jay M. Harris". Hup.harvard.edu. Archived from the original on 19 May 2009. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
- ^ Shelly Paz (8 May 2008) Tourism Ministry plans joint project with Morocco, Spain. The Jerusalem Post
- ^ "Maimonides". The Israel Museum. Jerusalem. 2 October 2018. Archived from the original on 20 May 2019. Retrieved 11 July 2019.
Bibliography
[edit]
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Joseph Jacobs, Isaac Broydé (1901–1906). "Moses Ben Maimon". In Singer I, et al. (eds.). The Jewish Encyclopedia. The Executive Committee of the Editorial Board, and Jacob Zallel Lauterbach. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.- Barzel U (1992). Maimonides' Medical Writings: The Art of Cure Extracts. Vol. 5. Galen: Maimonides Research Institute. Archived from the original on 17 June 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
- Bos G (2002). Maimonides. On Asthma (vol.1, vol.2). Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press.
- Bos G (2007). Maimonides. Medical Aphorisms Treatise 1–5 (6–9, 10–15, 16–21, 22–25). Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press.
- Davidson HA (2005). Moses Maimonides: The Man and his Works. Oxford University Press.
- Feldman Y (2008). Shemonah Perakim: The Eight Chapters of the Rambam. Targum Press.
- Fox M (1990). Interpreting Maimonides. Univ. of Chicago Press.
- Guttman J (1964). David Silverman (ed.). Philosophies of Judaism. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America.
- Halbertal M (2013). Maimonides: Life and Thought. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-15851-8. Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 23 June 2015.
- Hart Green K (2013). Leo Strauss on Maimonides: The Complete Writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Hartman D (1976). Maimonides: Torah and Philosophic Quest. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America. ISBN 978-0-8276-0083-6.
- Heschel AJ (1982). Maimonides: The Life and Times of a Medieval Jewish Thinker. New York: Farrar Straus.
- Husik I (2002) [1941]. A History of Jewish Philosophy. Dover Publications, Inc. Originally published by the Jewish Publication of America, Philadelphia.
- Kaplan A (1994). "Maimonides Principles: The Fundamentals of Jewish Faith". The Aryeh Kaplan Anthology. I.
- Kellner M (1986). Dogma in Medieval Jewish Thought. London: Oxford University press. ISBN 978-0-19-710044-8.
- Kohler GY (2012). "Reading Maimonides' Philosophy in 19th Century Germany". Amsterdam Studies in Jewish Philosophy. 15.
- Kraemer JL (28 October 2008). Maimonides: The Life and World of One of Civilization's Greatest Minds. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-385-52851-1.
- Leaman DH, Leaman F, Leaman O (2003). History of Jewish Philosophy (Second ed.). London and New York: Routledge. See especially chapters 10 through 15.
- Maimonides (1963). Suessmann Muntner (ed.). Moshe Ben Maimon (Maimonides) Medical Works (in Hebrew). Translated by Moshe Ibn Tibbon. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook. OCLC 729184001.
- Maimonides (1967). Mishnah, with Maimonides' Commentary (in Hebrew). Vol. 3. Translated by Yosef Qafih. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook. OCLC 741081810.
- Rosner F (1984–1994). Maimonides' Medical Writings. Vol. 7 Vols. Maimonides Research Institute. (Volume 5 translated by Uriel Barzel; foreword by Fred Rosner.)
- Seidenberg D (2005). "Maimonides – His Thought Related to Ecology". The Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. Archived from the original on 8 December 2013. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
- Shapiro MB (1993). "Maimonides Thirteen Principles: The Last Word in Jewish Theology?". The Torah U-Maddah Journal. 4.
- Shapiro MB (2008). Studies in Maimonides and His Interpreters. Scranton (PA): University of Scranton Press.
- Sirat C (1985). A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. See chapters 5 through 8.
- Strauss L (1974). Shlomo Pines (ed.). How to Begin to Study the Guide: The Guide of the Perplexed – Maimonides (in Arabic). Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press.
- Strauss L (1988). Persecution and the Art of Writing. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-77711-5. reprint
- Stroumsa S (2009). Maimonides in His World: Portrait of a Mediterranean Thinker. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-13763-6. Archived from the original on 3 June 2016. Retrieved 19 January 2011.
- Telushkin J (2006). A Code of Jewish Ethics. Vol. 1 (You Shall Be Holy). New York: Bell Tower. OCLC 460444264.
- Twersky I (1972). I Twersky (ed.). A Maimonides Reader. New York: Behrman House.
- Twersky I (1980). "Introduction to the Code of Maimonides (Mishneh Torah)". Yale Judaica Series. XII. New Haven and London.
Further reading
[edit]- Maimonides: Abū ʿImrān Mūsā [Moses] ibn ʿUbayd Allāh [Maymūn] al‐Qurṭubī www.islamsci.mcgill.ca Archived 27 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- "History of Medicine". AIME. Archived from the original on 24 May 2013.
- S. R. Simon (1999). "Moses Maimonides: medieval physician and scholar". Arch Intern Med. 159 (16): 1841–5. doi:10.1001/archinte.159.16.1841. PMID 10493314.
- Athar Yawar (2008). "Maimonides's medicine". The Lancet. 371 (9615): 804. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60365-7. S2CID 54415482.
- "Moses Maimonides | biography – Jewish philosopher, scholar, and physician". Archived from the original on 30 April 2015. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
- Dov Schwartz, The Many Faces of Maimonides, Boston: Academic Studies Press 2018. ISBN 978-1618119063
External links
[edit]This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. (April 2022) |
- About Maimonides
- Maimonides entry in the Jewish Encyclopedia (1906)
- Maimonides entry in the Encyclopædia Britannica
- Maimonides entry in the Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd edition (2007)
- Seeskin K. "Maimonides". In Zalta EN (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- "Maimonides entry in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy"
- Video lecture on Maimonides by Dr. Henry Abramson
- Maimonides, a biography — book by David Yellin and Israel Abrahams
- Maimonides as a Philosopher
- The Influence of Islamic Thought on Maimonides
- "The Moses of Cairo," Article from Policy Review
- Rambam and the Earth: Maimonides as a Proto-Ecological Thinker – reprint on neohasid.org from The Encyclopedia of Religion and Ecology
- Anti-Maimonidean Demons Archived 20 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine by Jose Faur, describing the controversy surrounding Maimonides' works
- David Yellin and Israel Abrahams, Maimonides (1903) (full text of a biography)
- Y. Tzvi Langermann (2007). "Maimonides: Abū ʿImrān Mūsā [Moses] ibn ʿUbayd Allāh [Maymūn] al-Qurṭubī". In Thomas Hockey, et al. (eds.). The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers. New York: Springer. pp. 726–7. ISBN 978-0-387-31022-0. (PDF version)
- Maimonides at intellectualencounters.org Archived 20 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine
- Kriesel H (2015). Judaism as Philosophy: Studies in Maimonides and the Medieval Jewish Philosophers of Provence. Boston: Academic Studies Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt21h4xpc. ISBN 978-1-61811-789-2. JSTOR j.ctt21h4xpc.
- Friedberg A (2013). Crafting the 613 Commandments: Maimonides on the Enumeration, Classification, and Formulation of the Scriptural Commandments. Boston: Academic Studies Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt21h4wf8. ISBN 978-1-61811-848-6. JSTOR j.ctt21h4wf8.
- The Guide: An Explanatory Commentary on Each Chapter of Maimonides' Guide of The Perplexed by Scott Michael Alexander (covers all of Book I, currently)
- Maimonides' works
- Steinberg The Rambam Mishneh Torah Codex on Amazon
- Steinberg The Rambam Chumash on Amazon
- Complete Mishneh Torah online, halakhic work of Maimonides
- Sefer Hamitzvot, English translation
- Oral Readings of Mishne Torah Archived 13 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine — Free listening and Download, site also had classes in Maimonides' Iggereth Teiman
- Maimonides 13 Principles Archived 31 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- Intellectual Encounters – Main Thinkers – Moses Maimonides, in intellectualencounters.org
- Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Autograph Draft Archived 29 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Egypt, c. 1180
- British Library – Autograph responsum of Moses Maimonides, pre-eminent Jewish polymath and spiritual leader, Ilana Tahan
- Digitized works by Maimonides at the Leo Baeck Institute
- Texts by Maimonides
- Siddur Mesorath Moshe, a prayerbook based on the early Jewish liturgy as found in Maimonides' Mishne Tora
- Rambam's introduction to the Mishneh Torah (English translation Archived 26 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine)
- Rambam's introduction to the Commentary on the Mishnah (Hebrew-language full text)
- The Guide For the Perplexed by Moses Maimonides translated into English by Michael Friedländer
- Writings of Maimonides; manuscripts and early print editions. Jewish National and University Library
- Facsimile edition of Moreh Nevukhim/The Guide for the Perplexed (illuminated Hebrew manuscript, Barcelona, 1347–48). The Royal Library, Copenhagen Archived 11 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine
- University of Cambridge Library collection Archived 29 January 2010 at the Wayback Machine of Judeo-Arabic letters and manuscripts written by or to Maimonides. It includes the last letter his brother David sent him before drowning at sea.
- A. Ashur, A newly discovered medical recipe written by Maimonides Archived 3 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine
- M.A Friedman and A. Ashur, A newly-discovered autograph responsum of Maimonides Archived 1 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine
- Works by Maimonides at Post-Reformation Digital Library
- Works by Maimonides at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)

Maimonides
View on GrokipediaBiography
Birth and Early Life in Cordoba
Moses ben Maimon, known as Maimonides, was born on 30 March 1138 in Córdoba, the capital of the Muslim-ruled Taifa of Córdoba within al-Andalus (modern-day Spain).[1][6] Córdoba at the time was a prosperous intellectual hub under the Almoravid dynasty, fostering a vibrant Jewish community engaged in scholarship, trade, and philosophy amid Islamic dominance.[1][3] He was the son of Maimon ben Joseph, a respected dayyan (religious judge) and Talmudic scholar who had studied under the prominent Rabbi Joseph ibn Migash, and whose own writings included a letter of consolation to the Jews of Narbonne following the Crusader massacre in 1146.[7][6] Little is documented about his mother, though the family belonged to a distinguished Sephardic lineage tracing back several generations of scholars.[6] Maimonides had at least one younger brother, David, who later became a merchant and financier supporting the family's scholarly endeavors.[1][6] From a young age, Maimonides received a rigorous education primarily from his father, covering Tanakh, Talmud, Halakha, and rabbinic literature alongside secular disciplines such as Arabic grammar, mathematics, astronomy, and Aristotelian logic, reflecting the syncretic intellectual environment of al-Andalus where Jewish thinkers interacted with Islamic and Greek traditions.[1][3] This formative period in Córdoba, lasting until approximately 1148, allowed him to develop foundational knowledge that informed his later codifications and philosophical syntheses, though specific early compositions from this era remain unattributed in primary records.[1][6] The family's relative affluence and stability during these years contrasted sharply with the upheavals that followed the Almohad conquest.[3]Exile Under Almohad Persecution
In 1148, the Almohad dynasty, a Berber Muslim movement emphasizing strict unitarianism (tawhid), conquered Córdoba, ending the relatively tolerant rule of the Almoravids and abolishing the dhimmi status that had afforded Jews and Christians protected minority rights in exchange for tribute.[1][7] The Almohads issued ultimatums requiring non-Muslims to convert to Islam, exile themselves, or face death, with enforcement including public recitations of the Islamic creed (shahada) and suppression of non-Islamic religious practices.[1][8] This policy devastated Jewish communities across Al-Andalus and North Africa, prompting mass forced conversions, executions (such as thousands in Marrakesh during rebellions), and widespread flight; in Al-Andalus, persecution intensified around 1160 under Caliph Abu Ya'qub Yusuf.[8] Maimonides, born on 30 March 1138 in Córdoba to a scholarly Jewish family, was approximately ten years old at the time of the conquest in May or June 1148.[1][7] His family, facing imminent danger, fled the city shortly thereafter, initiating a period of instability marked by secret adherence to Judaism amid Almohad dominance; some Muslim historical accounts allege the family outwardly converted to Islam between 1150 and 1160, though this remains disputed among scholars due to lack of corroboration in Jewish sources and Maimonides' own writings emphasizing steadfast observance.[1][7] The family wandered through southern Spain for about twelve years, evading detection while maintaining Torah study under his father, Maimon ben Joseph, a dayan (judge) who composed a liturgical poem decrying the persecutions.[9][8] In response to the crisis, Maimonides later authored the Iggeret ha-Shemad (Epistle on Apostasy, circa 1160s), a theological consolation for crypto-Jews (anusim) who had verbally apostatized to survive, arguing that such acts under duress did not nullify inner faith or ritual obligations performed privately, drawing on Talmudic precedents to reject messianic fervor or martyrdom as universal mandates.[1] This work reflected the pragmatic survival strategies adopted by many Jews, including possible temporary dissimulation, while critiquing overly rigid rabbinic views that deemed forced converts irredeemable.[8]Wanderings in North Africa and Palestine
Following the Almohad conquest of Cordoba in 1148, Maimonides and his family fled the city, initiating a period of nomadic existence across Almohad-dominated territories in the Iberian Peninsula and North Africa. For approximately a decade, they traversed southern Spain, avoiding detection while adhering to Jewish practices under threat of forced conversion or death.[10][1] Around 1160, the family reached Fez in Morocco, also under strict Almohad rule, where they adopted outward Muslim appearances as crypto-Jews to evade persecution. During this roughly five-year stay (c. 1160–1165), Maimonides, then in his early twenties, immersed himself in scholarly pursuits, completing his commentary on the Mishnah around 1168, though begun earlier. The household faced constant peril, as public Jewish observance was prohibited, and informants occasionally denounced suspected non-Muslims.[11][1][7] In 1165, amid rising dangers—including the execution of a local Jew for reverting to Judaism—Maimonides departed Fez with his family, embarking on a sea voyage eastward. They first landed in Acre (Akko) in Palestine, then proceeded to Jerusalem, still under Crusader control at the time. There, Maimonides ascended the Temple Mount, prayed at the Al-Aqsa Mosque site, and visited the Western Wall, fulfilling a pilgrimage despite the political instability. He also traveled to Hebron to pray at the Tomb of the Patriarchs before continuing onward.[12][7][13]Settlement in Egypt and Rise to Prominence
Following his arrival in Palestine in 1165, Maimonides proceeded to Egypt later that year, settling in Fustat, the historic Jewish quarter adjacent to Cairo.[1] There, he initially relied on the financial support of his younger brother David, a prosperous merchant engaged in trade with India, which allowed Maimonides to devote time to scholarly pursuits amid the relatively tolerant Fatimid regime.[14] This period marked a stabilization after years of displacement, though personal tragedy struck in 1170 when David's ship sank en route to India, drowning him and depriving the family of its primary income source.[14][15] To sustain his widowed sister, orphaned nephew, and himself, Maimonides, who had informally studied medicine earlier, formally pursued and practiced it as a profession starting around 1171.[16] His expertise quickly earned acclaim; he was appointed personal physician to al-Qadi al-Fadil, the influential vizier and chief administrator under Sultan Saladin, and later served Saladin himself following the Ayyubid conquest of Egypt in 1171.[17][18] This role not only provided financial security but elevated his status in a court where Saladin's administration valued competent Jewish physicians for their empirical knowledge and loyalty, amid ongoing Crusader threats.[3] Concurrently, Maimonides ascended in the Jewish communal hierarchy, becoming nagid (head or prince) of the Egyptian Jewish community by 1171, a position that involved adjudicating disputes, issuing responsa, and representing Jews before Muslim authorities.[19] His leadership consolidated authority over scattered congregations in Fustat and Alexandria, leveraging his halakhic scholarship—evident in the near-completion of the Mishneh Torah by 1180—to resolve doctrinal tensions and foster unity.[18] This dual prominence as physician and rabbinic authority reflected Egypt's pluralistic environment under Ayyubid rule, where Jews enjoyed protected dhimmi status, though subject to periodic taxes and restrictions.[3] By the 1180s, his influence extended beyond Egypt, with inquiries arriving from distant communities seeking his legal and medical guidance.[19]Family, Losses, and Personal Challenges
Maimonides wed later in life and fathered one known son, Abraham ben Maimon, born in Sivan 1185 CE (4945 AM) in Fustat, Egypt, when Maimonides was approximately 47 years old. Abraham, who trained under his father in medicine, philosophy, and Jewish law, succeeded him as nagid (head) of the Egyptian Jewish community and authored works extending Maimonidean thought, dying in 1237 CE.[20][21] His father, Maimon ben Joseph, a talmudist, judge, and author of a Hebrew work on the Jewish calendar, died circa 1166 CE shortly after the family's arrival in Egypt, amid their wanderings following Almohad persecution. This loss compounded the hardships of displacement, leaving Maimonides as the primary scholarly and familial anchor.[22][23] The death of his younger brother David represented the gravest personal tragedy. David, a prosperous merchant trading in India and Yemen, perished in a shipwreck in the Indian Ocean between 1169 and 1177 CE, most accounts placing it around 1170 CE; with him sank the family's wealth, including funds entrusted for commerce. Maimonides assumed support for David's widow, two orphaned children, and extended kin, shifting from scholarly pursuits to medical practice for sustenance.[7][3][24] In a letter to a disciple, Maimonides detailed the ensuing despair: the calamity induced profound melancholy, physical debilitation, and withdrawal from society for nearly a year, during which he barely ate or engaged intellectually, only recovering through gradual immersion in communal responsibilities. This episode underscored his vulnerability amid successive bereavements and exile's toll, yet catalyzed his renowned medical career.[25][12] Thereafter, personal challenges intensified with multifaceted duties in Fustat: as court physician to vizier al-Qadi al-Fadil and Sultan Saladin (post-1171), he attended dozens of patients daily from dawn, often without respite for meals or study; as nagid, he adjudicated disputes and led the community; and as author, he composed major works amid fatigue. These burdens, rooted in familial obligation and historical upheaval, persisted until his death, reflecting resilience forged by loss.[3][26]Death and Burial Traditions
Maimonides died on December 12, 1204, in Fustat (modern-day Cairo), Egypt, at the age of approximately 66, likely from exhaustion due to his demanding roles as a physician, rabbinic judge, and scholar attending to communal needs.[1][27] Jewish burial practices, which emphasize prompt interment to honor the dignity of the deceased (kavod ha-met), were followed; his body underwent taharah, a ritual purification by a chevra kadisha, and was dressed in simple white tachrichim shrouds before initial burial in Fustat, possibly near the synagogue where he had served.[28][12] In accordance with his expressed wish to be buried in the Land of Israel, Maimonides' remains were exhumed shortly after and transported northward, a common practice in medieval Jewish tradition for revered figures to ensure eternal rest in Eretz Yisrael.[29] The journey culminated in reburial in Tiberias, on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee, where the site—traditionally identified as adjacent to graves of earlier sages like Yochanan ben Zakai—has been venerated since at least the mid-13th century, with the earliest written attestation appearing in 1258. Legends surrounding the transfer include accounts of his body being placed on a camel that autonomously proceeded to Tiberias and halted at the designated spot, and rival claims from cities like Jerusalem and Hebron for the burial rights, resolved in favor of Tiberias due to familial ties or divine indication.[30][31] These narratives, while not corroborated by contemporary records, reflect the high esteem in which Maimonides was held, underscoring efforts to associate his resting place with sacred geography. The tomb in Tiberias has evolved into a major pilgrimage destination, attracting over 500,000 visitors annually, particularly on his yahrzeit (anniversary of death) on 20 Tevet, when traditions include festive hillula gatherings with Torah study, feasting, and prayers, blending mourning with celebration of his legacy—a practice rooted in kabbalistic customs for tzaddikim (righteous ones).[32][33] The site features a stone marker inscribed with an epitaph praising his wisdom, and archaeological elements like ancient synagogues nearby reinforce its historical continuity, though debates persist on the exact interment location based on medieval texts.[34]Intellectual Works
Halakhic Codification: Mishneh Torah
The Mishneh Torah, also known as Yad HaḤazakah ("Hand of the Strong"), represents Maimonides' systematic codification of Jewish law (halakha), encompassing all binding commandments derived from the Torah, Talmud, and post-Talmudic authorities. Completed in 1180 CE after roughly a decade of composition in Egypt, the work spans approximately 1,000 chapters organized without explicit citations to prior sources, aiming for brevity and accessibility akin to the Mishnah.[35][36] In the introduction, Maimonides articulates the purpose: to enable any individual, regardless of scholarly background, to ascertain the precise requirements of Jewish law directly from the text, obviating the need to navigate the vast, often contradictory expanse of Talmudic literature. He emphasizes that the code distills "the whole of the Oral Law" into clear rulings, stating, "All the laws... if one wishes to study the Torah, one need study nothing else," thereby democratizing legal knowledge while prioritizing practical observance over dialectical debate. This approach reflects Maimonides' rationalist commitment to logical synthesis, rejecting the Talmud's casuistic style in favor of thematic coherence.[37] The structure comprises 14 books (sedarim), departing from the Talmud's tractate sequence to impose a hierarchical order starting with intellectual foundations and progressing to civil and ritual laws:- Sefer Madda (Book of Knowledge): Covers philosophical foundations, including beliefs, repentance, and Torah study.
- Sefer Ahavah (Book of Love): Addresses prayer, tefillin, blessings, and love of God.
- Sefer Zemannim (Book of Times): Treats Shabbat, festivals, and fasts.
- Sefer Nashim (Book of Women): Details marriage, divorce, and levirate marriage.
- Sefer Kedushah (Book of Holiness): Prohibitions on illicit relations and dietary laws.
- Sefer Zera'im (Book of Seeds): Agricultural laws and tithes.
- Sefer Avodah (Book of Service): Temple rituals and sacrifices. Subsequent books cover purity laws (Taharah), injuries (Nezikin), acquisitions (Kinyan), judiciary (Shoftim), and constitutional matters (Mishpatim). This cosmological progression, from human intellect to societal order, underscores Maimonides' view of halakha as mirroring divine wisdom.[38][39]
Philosophical Synthesis: Guide for the Perplexed
The Guide for the Perplexed (Arabic: Dalālat al-ḥāʾirīn; Hebrew: Moreh Nevukhim), completed by Maimonides in 1190, serves as a philosophical treatise addressed ostensibly to his disciple Joseph ben Judah of Ceuta, aiming to resolve apparent contradictions between the Hebrew Bible and Aristotelian philosophy for intellectually advanced readers perplexed by literal interpretations of scripture that conflict with rational inquiry.[1] Written in Judeo-Arabic, the work employs an esoteric style with equivocal terminology to conceal deeper meanings from the uninitiated, guiding the "perplexed" toward a harmonized understanding of Torah and science.[1] Maimonides emphasizes that true comprehension requires mastery of both rabbinic tradition and Greek philosophy, particularly Aristotle as interpreted through Islamic thinkers like Al-Farabi and Avicenna.[42] The text is structured in three parts, progressing from foundational theology to metaphysical culmination. Part One addresses the nature of God, rejecting anthropomorphic depictions in scripture as pedagogical accommodations for the masses; it advocates negative theology, where divine attributes are understood via negation (e.g., God is not corporeal, not multiple), drawing on Aristotelian logic to interpret biblical language as equivocal or metaphorical.[1] Maimonides critiques kalam mutakallimun atomism and anthropomorphism, positing creation ex nihilo as compatible with Aristotelian eternity only if reconciled through divine will.[1] Part Two examines Aristotelian physics and cosmology, including the celestial spheres and causality, while subordinating them to Jewish doctrine; it discusses prophecy as a natural perfection of intellect enabled by divine overflow, and miracles as alterations within the natural order rather than suspensions of it.[1] Here, Maimonides integrates Ptolemaic astronomy with Torah, arguing that scientific truths do not contradict revelation but illuminate it for the elite.[42] Part Three delves into metaphysics, ethics, and eschatology, interpreting the Merkabah mysticism and prophetic visions allegorically as intellectual apprehension of divine emanations; it outlines a rational ethics rooted in Aristotelian virtue, where human perfection lies in intellectual conjunction with the Active Intellect, leading to immortality of the soul separate from bodily resurrection, which Maimonides affirms minimally as a future event for the righteous.[1] Throughout, the Guide synthesizes rationalism with fidelity to halakha, asserting that philosophy elucidates rather than supplants Torah, though it warns against vulgarizing esoteric knowledge.[42] This framework influenced subsequent Jewish, Christian, and Islamic thought, positioning Maimonides as a pivotal figure in medieval rationalism.[43]Medical and Scientific Treatises
Maimonides produced a series of medical treatises in Arabic during the later part of his life, primarily after settling in Egypt and establishing his practice as a physician around 1168. Appointed court physician to the vizier al-Qadi al-Fadil circa 1174 and subsequently to Sultan Saladin around 1185, he drew on Galenic and Hippocratic traditions while incorporating empirical observations from his clinical experience treating diverse patients, including the royal court.[24][17] These works emphasize rational diagnosis, humoral balance, dietary regimen, and psychological factors in health, reflecting a holistic approach that subordinates medicine to physics and metaphysics in his broader intellectual hierarchy.[44] His most extensive medical contribution is the Medical Aphorisms (Kitāb al-Fuṣūl fī al-Ṭibb), composed between approximately 1191 and his death in 1204, consisting of 25 treatises containing over 1,500 aphorisms. Divided thematically—covering topics from general principles of medicine, fevers, and anatomy to surgery, poisons, and gynecology—the text compiles concise extracts from authorities like Galen, Hippocrates, and Rufus of Ephesus, augmented by Maimonides' own annotations and critiques where he identified inconsistencies or outdated views. Intended as a practical handbook for physicians, it prioritizes brevity and applicability, warning against over-reliance on theory without experience.[45][46] For instance, in discussing fevers, Maimonides advocates observation of pulse and urine alongside environmental factors, rejecting purely speculative etiologies.[47] Other specialized treatises address particular ailments and therapies. The Treatise on Hemorrhoids (Maqāla fī al-Bawāsīr), written in response to a patron's query in the 1190s, details causes such as dietary excess and sedentary habits, symptoms including prolapse and bleeding, and treatments ranging from purgatives and ointments to surgical interventions like cauterization when conservative measures fail.[44] Similarly, the Treatise on Asthma (Maqāla fī al-Ḥayā) classifies the condition within Galenic respiratory categories, attributing it to phlegmatic imbalances exacerbated by cold, moist environments, and recommends emetics, expectorants, and lifestyle modifications like relocation to drier climates.[48] The Treatise on Poisons and Their Antidotes (Maqāla fī al-Summ wa-l-Tiryāq) outlines toxic substances from natural sources, their symptoms, and rational antidotes based on contraria contrariis principles, such as using cold agents against hot poisons, while cautioning against unverified folk remedies.[2] Maimonides also authored practical guides on preventive care and pharmacology. The Regimen of Health (Fuṣūl Mūsā) prescribes moderation in diet, exercise, sleep, and emotions to maintain humoral equilibrium, linking physical health to moral virtues and intellectual pursuits.[44] His Glossary of Drug Names (Tafsīr Asāmī al-Agdiya) standardizes Arabic, Greek, and Syriac terms for over 400 medicaments, facilitating precise compounding and reflecting his effort to resolve terminological ambiguities in inherited texts.[49] The Treatise on Cohabitation (Maqāla fī al-Jimāʿ) offers hygienic advice on sexual relations to prevent disease transmission and ensure reproductive health, integrating medical with ethical considerations.[50] These compositions, totaling around ten distinct works, demonstrate Maimonides' commitment to empirical validation and causal explanation in medicine, often critiquing overly dogmatic adherence to predecessors in favor of reasoned adaptation to observed outcomes.[51]Logical and Astronomical Writings
Maimonides' principal logical work, the Treatise on Logic (Maqālah fī ṣināʿat al-manṭiḳ in Arabic, translated into Hebrew as Millot ha-Higgayon), was composed in his youth, around age sixteen in 1154, marking it as his earliest extant philosophical composition.[52] [53] This concise handbook introduces Aristotelian logic, defining key technical terms from the Organon such as syllogism, demonstration, and dialectic, while distinguishing theoretical philosophy (encompassing metaphysics, physics, and mathematics) from practical philosophy (ethics, politics, and economics).[54] The treatise emphasizes logic's role as an instrument for acquiring certain knowledge, rejecting sophistry and equivocation, and reflects Maimonides' early engagement with Arabic philosophical traditions derived from Aristotle via Al-Farabi.[55] Originally written in Judeo-Arabic, it was translated into Hebrew by Moses ibn Tibbon in the 13th century, facilitating its study in Jewish scholarly circles.[56] In the treatise, Maimonides outlines ten logical terms central to demonstration, including genus, species, difference, property, and accident, underscoring their utility in avoiding ambiguity in scientific and theological discourse.[54] He classifies syllogisms into demonstrative (yielding necessary truths), dialectical (based on generally accepted opinions), sophistical (deceptive), and poetic or rhetorical (persuasive but not probative), prioritizing demonstrative reasoning for true understanding.[55] This work demonstrates Maimonides' commitment to logic as a prerequisite for rational inquiry, influencing later Jewish philosophers despite its brevity of approximately 20 folios in manuscript form.[52] Maimonides' astronomical writings are embedded primarily within his Mishneh Torah, particularly in the Book of Knowledge's section Laws Concerning the Sanctification of the New Moon (Hilchot Kiddush HaChodesh), completed around 1180, where he details Ptolemaic geocentric models to compute the Jewish lunar calendar.[57] [58] This includes calculations for lunar crescent visibility using angular measurements—requiring the moon's elongation from the sun to exceed 7 degrees 11 arcminutes—and tables for solar and lunar motions based on Arabic sources like al-Battani, enabling precise determination of new months and festivals.[59] [60] He describes a universe of nine concentric spheres enclosing the Earth, with the fixed stars in the eighth sphere and the ninth as a starless orb influencing sublunary motions, rejecting Aristotelian incorruptible heavens in favor of empirical Ptolemaic adjustments.[61] Complementing these, Maimonides authored a Letter on Astrology (circa 1190), dismissing judicial astrology as idolatrous superstition unsupported by observation or reason, arguing that celestial influences, if any, affect bodies universally rather than individuals via horoscopes, and citing empirical failures like identical twins with divergent fates.[62] [63] His astronomical framework prioritizes mathematics over metaphysics, viewing it as provisional and subject to revision with new data, as evidenced by his critique of outdated Talmudic models in favor of contemporary Islamic astronomy.[64] [65] These elements underscore Maimonides' integration of astronomy for halakhic precision while subordinating it to theological ends, eschewing deterministic or divinatory interpretations.[58]Philosophical Framework
Rationalist Methodology and Aristotelian Integration
Maimonides employed a rationalist methodology that prioritized logical demonstration and empirical observation in interpreting Jewish texts, drawing extensively from Aristotelian principles to resolve apparent conflicts between philosophy and revelation. In his Guide for the Perplexed, composed between 1186 and 1190, he systematically addresses the "perplexed" individuals versed in both Torah and Aristotelian science, advocating an esoteric approach to exegesis that avoids literalism in anthropomorphic descriptions of God while upholding scriptural authority.[1] This method involved parabolic interpretation of biblical parables and equivocal terms to align with metaphysical truths, subordinating unaided reason to prophetic revelation yet utilizing philosophy as a tool for deeper comprehension.[3] Central to Maimonides' integration of Aristotle was the adoption of the Greek philosopher's natural philosophy, including the four causes and hylomorphic theory, applied to theological questions such as divine attributes and creation. He regarded Aristotle's intellectual achievements as the apex of human reason absent prophecy, frequently citing works like Physics and Metaphysics—over 49 direct references in the Guide—to refute non-Aristotelian views such as those of the Kalam theologians.[1] However, Maimonides critiqued and modified Aristotelian doctrines where they clashed with Mosaic tradition; notably, he rejected the eternity of the world, arguing via probabilistic demonstrations for creation ex nihilo as more coherent with both reason and scripture, deeming Aristotle's position philosophically tentative rather than demonstrative.[1][66] In epistemology, Maimonides aligned with the Arabic Aristotelian tradition, emphasizing certain knowledge through syllogistic reasoning and sense perception, while extending this to prophetic knowledge as an overflow of the Active Intellect. His ethical framework incorporated Aristotelian eudaimonia—human flourishing through intellectual perfection—but framed it within halakhic observance, positing that virtues derive from rational understanding of divine wisdom rather than mere habituation.[67] This synthesis positioned philosophy as preparatory for theology, ensuring rational inquiry reinforced rather than supplanted faith, as evidenced in his rejection of astrology and anthropomorphism in favor of abstract divine unity.[68]Principles of Faith and Theological Foundations
Maimonides formulated the Thirteen Principles of Faith, known as ikkarim ha-emunah, in his Commentary on the Mishnah (Sefer ha-Mishnah im Perush Rabbenu Moshe ben Maimon), specifically in the introduction to Perek Chelek, the tenth chapter of tractate Sanhedrin, written in Arabic around the 1160s during his early years in Egypt. These principles synthesize core tenets derived from scripture, rabbinic tradition, and rational inquiry, serving as obligatory beliefs for Jews to affirm their orthodoxy and eligibility for a share in the world to come.[1] Maimonides presented them as fundamental opinions (shi'ur komah) essential to the Law, rejecting deviations as heretical, though he drew them from implicit foundations in the Talmud rather than inventing dogmas ex nihilo.[69] The principles are: (1) God exists as the creator and ruler of all things; (2) God is one and unique; (3) God is incorporeal, without body or form; (4) God is eternal, preceding the creation of the world; (5) only God may be worshipped; (6) God communicates through prophets; (7) the prophecy of Moses surpasses all others in clarity and directness; (8) the entire Torah was given by God to Moses at Sinai; (9) the Torah is immutable and no other Torah will come; (10) God knows the deeds of humans; (11) God rewards the righteous and punishes the wicked; (12) the Messiah will come; and (13) the dead will be resurrected in the future.[1] These axioms integrate theological, prophetic, and eschatological elements, emphasizing intellectual assent over mere ritual observance.[70] Theologically, Maimonides grounded these principles in a rationalist framework influenced by Aristotelian metaphysics, advocating a via negativa for divine attributes to preserve God's transcendence and avoid anthropomorphism, which he equated with idolatry.[71] God's unity (yichud) precludes composition or multiplicity, incorporeality denies spatial or sensory qualities, and eternity aligns with creation ex nihilo as rationally necessary for divine freedom and commandment-giving.[1] Prophecy requires intellectual preparation and divine overflow, with Moses achieving unmediated vision, while miracles affirm but do not contradict natural order under providence.[71] This synthesis aimed to reconcile revealed faith with demonstrative reason, positioning true belief as cognitive perfection leading to human flourishing, rather than superstitious literalism.
Views on Prophecy, Miracles, and Divine Providence
Maimonides presents his views on prophecy, miracles, and divine providence in The Guide for the Perplexed, emphasizing a rational framework where these phenomena align with natural causation rather than arbitrary supernatural interventions. Prophecy, in his analysis, arises as a natural perfection of human faculties, requiring the conjunction of a highly developed intellect with the imaginative faculty through an overflow from the divine active intellect.[72] This process demands prior moral and intellectual preparation, including mastery of Torah and detachment from bodily desires, rendering it accessible only to exceptional individuals.[73] Unlike popular conceptions of prophecy as divine whim, Maimonides insists it follows deterministic natural laws, with Mosaic prophecy distinguished by its purity—devoid of imaginative intermediaries and achieving direct intellectual union with God.[74] Miracles, for Maimonides, do not suspend or alter the eternal natural order established at creation but represent preordained events whose causes were embedded within nature from the outset. He argues that God's knowledge encompasses all particulars without implying change in divine will, thus avoiding violations of immutability; for instance, the parting of the Red Sea occurred via a strong east wind whose conditions were inherently possible and foreseen.[75] This perspective reconciles biblical accounts with Aristotelian physics, positing miracles as rare actualizations of potentialities rather than novel creations ex nihilo post-creation.[76] Maimonides critiques views implying divine caprice, maintaining that prophetic foreknowledge of miracles underscores their integration into the causal chain, not their abrogation of laws.[77] Divine providence operates selectively, extending particularly to individuals insofar as they achieve intellectual perfection and apprehension of God, rather than universally over all creation. Maimonides rejects Epicurean denial of providence, Aristotelian general oversight of species, and opinions attributing uniform care to all beings, instead linking individual protection to the overflow of divine intellect into human reason.[78] Thus, the intellectually virtuous experience targeted guidance and safeguarding, while the ignorant or animal-like fall under chance or natural necessity; human suffering often stems from deficient intellect rather than divine neglect.[79] This intellect-centric model underscores ethical and cognitive striving as causal mechanisms for providence, aligning personal flourishing with metaphysical conjunction.[80]Ethics, Virtue Ethics, and Human Flourishing
Maimonides' ethical framework integrates Aristotelian virtue theory with Jewish divine command morality, positing that moral virtues are acquired through habitual practice guided by Torah commandments to achieve equilibrium between extremes.[1] In his Eight Chapters, an introduction to his commentary on the Mishnah, he endorses the doctrine of the golden mean, where virtues like generosity, courage, and humility represent moderation between excess and deficiency, aligning actions with rational human nature.[81] Similarly, in the Mishneh Torah's Book of Knowledge (Hilkhot De'ot), Maimonides prescribes traits such as moderation in eating, drinking, and interpersonal conduct to maintain bodily and psychic health, enabling pursuit of higher intellectual ends.[3] This virtue ethics serves instrumental purposes rather than intrinsic ones; moral perfection stabilizes the appetites and passions, preventing disruptions to contemplative life, but ultimate human excellence lies in intellectual perfection.[82] Maimonides delineates a hierarchy of perfections: acquisition of wealth and honor ranks lowest, followed by physical health, moral virtues, and finally intellectual attainment through study of logic, mathematics, physics, and metaphysics, culminating in knowledge of God.[83] True flourishing, or eudaimonia in Aristotelian terms adapted to monotheism, involves conjunction with the divine Active Intellect, where the perfected human intellect overflows with eternal truths, transcending temporal bodily concerns.[84] In the Guide for the Perplexed, Maimonides emphasizes that ethical observance of commandments fosters this intellectual ascent, as divine law perfects both moral disposition and rational capacity, leading to love of God proportional to comprehension of His essence via negative attributes.[85] Prophets exemplify this synthesis, combining moral virtues with superior intellect, but for the masses, halakhic practice ensures communal order and individual preparation for whatever intellectual grasp is attainable.[1] Human flourishing thus demands rigorous self-discipline in virtues not as ends but as prerequisites for metaphysical insight, rejecting ascetic extremes or indulgent passions that impede rational worship.[86] This teleological view posits ethics as causal pathway to immortality of the intellect, where virtuous life in this world yields eternal intellectual activity post-mortem.[87]Eschatological Doctrines: Messiah, Resurrection, Immortality
Maimonides outlined his eschatological views primarily in the Mishneh Torah, particularly in Hilchot Melachim uMilchamot (Laws of Kings and Wars, chapters 11–12), and in his philosophical magnum opus, the Guide for the Perplexed, with clarifications in the Treatise on Resurrection composed around 1191–1194 CE to address criticisms of perceived denial of corporeal resurrection.[88][89] His doctrines emphasize a naturalistic Messianic era without suspension of the laws of nature, a miraculous but transient resurrection of the body, and ultimate immortality through intellectual perfection of the soul, subordinating literalist interpretations to rational principles derived from Aristotelian metaphysics and Jewish scriptural exegesis.[90] Regarding the Messiah, Maimonides depicts him as a human descendant of King David who achieves kingship through political and military success, compelling observance of Torah law, gathering Jewish exiles to Israel, rebuilding the Temple in Jerusalem, and establishing universal peace via knowledge of God rather than coercive miracles. This figure restores Davidic sovereignty but does not alter the natural order: "Do not presume that in the Messianic age any facet of the world's nature will change or there will be innovations in the work of creation," he states, noting that natural processes like birth, death, and commerce persist, with swords beaten into plowshares only metaphorically through enlightened governance.[91] The Messiah's advent fulfills prophecies without abrogating Torah or introducing novelties, serving as a preparatory phase for spiritual elevation where humanity focuses on intellectual worship of God.[88] Failure to meet these criteria disqualifies claimants, as verified by empirical outcomes like sovereignty and Temple reconstruction, not subjective visions or signs.[92] On resurrection, Maimonides affirms it as a cardinal principle of faith, enumerated among his Thirteen Principles, involving God's miraculous reanimation of the righteous dead in corporeal form during the Messianic era as a reward and demonstration of divine power.[93] In the Treatise on Resurrection, he counters accusations—stemming from esoteric readings of the Guide that prioritized soul over body—by insisting resurrection is literal and physical, not merely allegorical immortality, though he qualifies it as temporary: resurrected bodies experience a period of earthly-like existence before perishing again, as perpetual corporeality contradicts the superiority of disembodied intellectual felicity. This miracle proves creation ex nihilo and God's omnipotence but is inferior to the eternal olam ha-ba (World to Come), where souls detached from matter enjoy undiluted contemplation; he argues against perpetual bodily resurrection as philosophically untenable, given the soul's essence as intellect independent of physical substrate.[89] Critics, including some contemporaries, viewed his emphasis on intellect as undermining resurrection's centrality, prompting the treatise's defensive tone while upholding orthodoxy against rationalist excesses.[94] Maimonides' conception of immortality centers on the soul's intellectual apprehension of divine truths, achieving eternal conjunction with the Active Intellect—a separate, eternal emanation from God—rather than personal survival in a somatic paradise.[95] In Guide for the Perplexed (3:51–54), only individuals who perfect their rational faculties through Torah study and ethical virtue attain this immortality, as the soul's essence is form without matter; unperfected souls perish entirely, rendering immortality merit-based and non-universal.[96] The olam ha-ba thus constitutes a timeless, non-spatial realm of pure noetic activity, distinct from the temporal Messianic age and transient resurrection, aligning with Aristotelian causality where ultimate human flourishing derives from knowing immutable truths rather than sensory pleasures or corporeal eternity.[90] This framework resolves scriptural promises of afterlife rewards by interpreting them esoterically for the elite while accommodating literal beliefs for the masses, prioritizing causal realism in divine-human relations over anthropomorphic fantasies.[94]Rejection of Astrology, Anthropomorphism, and Superstition
Maimonides systematically rejected astrology as a false doctrine that undermines rational understanding and borders on idolatry. In Mishneh Torah, specifically in Hilchot Avodah Zarah (Laws of Idolatry) 11:8–9, he asserts that the stars and constellations possess no influence over human character or destiny beyond observable natural effects, such as tidal influences from the moon, and that belief in astrological determinism contradicts free will and divine providence.[63] He further argues in the Guide for the Perplexed (III:37) that astrology fails scientific scrutiny, lacking empirical validation or logical necessity, and attributes its persistence to ancient pagan errors rather than truth.[97] This stance demonstrated intellectual independence, as astrology permeated medieval Jewish, Islamic, and Christian thought, yet Maimonides prioritized Aristotelian physics and observation over horoscopic predictions.[63] Regarding anthropomorphism, Maimonides devoted extensive analysis in the Guide for the Perplexed (Part I, chapters 1–49) to interpreting biblical descriptions of God—such as references to divine "hands," "eyes," or "anger"—as metaphorical accommodations to human comprehension, not literal attributions of corporeal form.[98] He contended that ascribing physicality or emotions to the incorporeal deity constitutes heresy, as it implies composition, change, or limitation incompatible with God's unity and eternity, drawing on Aristotelian metaphysics to affirm divine simplicity.[99] In Mishneh Torah (Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah 1:7–9), he codifies that God has no body or form, prohibiting any imaginative depiction, and urges allegorical exegesis of scriptural anthropomorphisms to preserve monotheistic purity against idolatrous tendencies.[100] This approach aimed to elevate theology beyond vulgar conceptions prevalent in popular religion and rabbinic aggadah, fostering intellectual worship over sensory imagery.[101] Maimonides extended his critique to broader superstitions, including magic, amulets, incantations, and omens, viewing them as irrational relics of paganism that foster dependency on illusions rather than causality and ethics. In Mishneh Torah (Hilchot Avodah Zarah 11:4–6), he prohibits practices like whispering spells or relying on charms for protection, equating them with forbidden sorcery that denies God's direct governance through natural laws.[102] He attributes such beliefs to fear of the unknown and ignorance of secondary causes, arguing in the Guide (I:61–65) that true miracles stem from prophetic preparation, not manipulative rituals, and that superstition erodes moral agency by promoting fatalism.[103] Even ritual objects like mezuzot, he reinterprets in Hilchot Mezuzah (5:4–6) as symbols for contemplative remembrance of divine unity, stripping them of magical efficacy to align with rational piety.[104] This rejection reinforced his vision of Judaism as a rational system combating empirical falsehoods, though it sparked tensions with communities valuing mystical or folk traditions.[105]Controversies and Critiques
Internal Jewish Debates on Rationalism vs. Tradition
Maimonides' integration of Aristotelian philosophy with Jewish theology, as expounded in The Guide for the Perplexed (completed circa 1190), elicited significant internal opposition from Jewish scholars who prioritized literal interpretations of scripture and Talmudic tradition over rationalist reinterpretations. Critics contended that Maimonides' metaphorical approach to anthropomorphic biblical language, such as visions of God or angels, risked eroding the foundational authority of revealed texts by subordinating them to Greek logic, potentially fostering skepticism toward miracles and divine intervention as supernatural events.[106][107] A prominent voice in these debates was Nachmanides (Ramban, 1194–1270), who, while acknowledging philosophy's utility for the elite, criticized Maimonides for overemphasizing reason at the expense of tradition's mystical dimensions. In his Torah commentary, Nachmanides rejected Maimonides' allegorical dismissal of corporeal elements in divine encounters, such as Abraham's vision in Genesis 18, arguing instead for a synthesis where tradition's literal core—infused with Kabbalistic insights—preserved Judaism's unique supernatural character against universalist rationalism.[106][108] Central to the contention was Maimonides' doctrine of resurrection, outlined in his Essay on Resurrection (1191), where he affirmed bodily revival as a miraculous concession to tradition but posited intellectual immortality as the ultimate human perfection, downplaying eternal physical existence. Traditionalists, including Nachmanides in his dedicated treatise, countered that this rational minimization contradicted Talmudic promises of corporeal reward (e.g., Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 90b–92b), accusing Maimonides of Aristotelian influence that diluted eschatological hopes central to popular piety.[109][110] These debates also extended to prophecy and providence, with Maimonides viewing prophecy as an intellectual attainment enabled by natural preparation rather than arbitrary divine election, a stance opponents like Judah Halevi (d. 1141) had prefigured by defending Judaism's historical particularism over philosophy's impersonal causality. Critics feared such views implied a deterministic universe, conflicting with tradition's emphasis on God's willful suspension of natural laws, as in the Exodus miracles, and warned that privileging reason could empower unqualified readers to question core dogmas like creation ex nihilo.[111][112] Proponents of tradition argued that Maimonides' esotericism, intended to shield the masses from perplexing truths, inadvertently promoted elitism, where philosophical adepts dismissed aggadic narratives as parables, undermining the unified worldview binding communal observance to belief. While Maimonides maintained that reason purified faith from superstition—aligning Torah with demonstrable truths—his detractors upheld tradition as self-sufficient, cautioning that unchecked rationalism echoed ancient Sadducean rationalizations rejected by rabbinic sages. These exchanges, spanning Provence, Spain, and beyond, highlighted Judaism's tension between intellectual inquiry and fidelity to inherited revelation, influencing subsequent scholastic trajectories without resolving the divide.[113][114]The Maimonidean Controversy and Book Burnings
The Maimonidean Controversy intensified in the early 1230s in southern France, where traditionalist rabbis, led by Solomon ben Abraham of Montpellier, opposed the study of Maimonides' philosophical works, particularly The Guide for the Perplexed, fearing they encouraged Aristotelian rationalism at the expense of traditional faith.[41] These critics issued cherem (excommunications) against students of philosophy under age 25 and appealed to rabbinic authorities in northern France for support, escalating internal Jewish divisions between rationalists and anti-rationalists.[41] In a pivotal escalation, anti-Maimonidean rabbis denounced Maimonides' writings to Dominican friars, arguing the texts promoted heresy, which prompted Christian authorities to intervene amid their own restrictions on Aristotelian philosophy decreed by Pope Gregory IX in 1231.[41] On an unspecified date in 1232, Dominican monks publicly burned copies of The Guide for the Perplexed and portions of Mishneh Torah in a Paris public square, marking one of the earliest recorded instances of targeted destruction of Jewish philosophical literature by Christian clergy.[41] [115] This burning shocked Jewish communities across Europe, temporarily halting the controversy as proponents and opponents reconciled to avoid further external threats, with figures like Jonah Gerondi later expressing remorse for involving non-Jewish authorities.[116] The event underscored the risks of intra-communal disputes spilling into broader persecution, as the Dominicans exploited the perceived Jewish condemnation of Maimonides to justify suppressing rationalist texts aligned with condemned pagan philosophy.[115] Subsequent waves of the controversy persisted, including a 1305 ban by Solomon ibn Adret in Barcelona prohibiting philosophy study for those under 25, but the 1232 burnings highlighted the fragility of Jewish intellectual autonomy under medieval Christian dominance.[41] Despite the destruction, Maimonides' works survived and continued to influence Jewish thought, demonstrating the ineffectiveness of such prohibitions against established rationalist traditions.[116]Accusations of Elitism, Esotericism, and Heresy
Maimonides employed an esoteric method in his Guide for the Perplexed (completed around 1190), using equivocal terms, parables, and deliberate contradictions to veil metaphysical truths from unqualified readers while guiding the philosophically adept toward rational theology.[117] This technique, which Maimonides justified as necessary to avert persecution and preserve public piety, provoked accusations of deliberate obscurity and deception from traditionalist critics who argued it fostered suspicion of hidden heterodoxies incompatible with rabbinic tradition.[118] The esotericism intertwined with charges of elitism, as Maimonides posited that profound comprehension of divine incorporeality and providence demands rigorous Aristotelian training accessible only to an intellectual minority, relegating the masses to literal scriptural interpretations and imaginative anthropomorphisms as ethical safeguards rather than truth.[119] Opponents, including later kabbalistic and pietistic thinkers, condemned this hierarchy as undervaluing the spiritual potential of ordinary believers and prioritizing pagan philosophy over unmediated Torah study, thereby risking communal division. Heresy allegations peaked during the Maimonidean Controversy of the 1230s, when Provençal rabbis such as Jonah Gerondi and Solomon of Montpellier denounced the Guide for allegedly endorsing eternalism over creation ex nihilo, naturalizing miracles within Aristotelian causality, minimizing bodily resurrection to a metaphorical or ancillary event, and negating anthropomorphic depictions to the extent of implying divine impassivity incompatible with biblical providence.[116] These critics, fearing philosophy's corrosive influence on faith, appealed to church authorities; consequently, in 1232, the Bishop of Paris ordered the public burning of the Guide and other Maimonidean works alongside Averroes' texts, an event instigated partly by Jewish informants highlighting purported blasphemies.[116] Despite defenses from Sephardic scholars like Nahmanides, who critiqued excesses but upheld Maimonides' orthodoxy, the charges underscored tensions between rationalist synthesis and literalist fidelity, with some ascribing the backlash to envy or misunderstanding of his intent to fortify Judaism against external skepticism.[41]Engagement with Mysticism and Kabbalah
Maimonides approached mysticism through a rationalist lens, rejecting practices and interpretations that implied divine corporeality or irrational speculation. In the Mishneh Torah, he explicitly prohibited amulets inscribed with divine names, incantations, and whispering over wounds as forms of sorcery akin to idolatry, arguing these fostered superstition rather than true piety (Hilkhot Avodah Zarah 11:4-6).[120] He extended this critique to early Jewish mystical texts like Shi'ur Qomah, which anthropomorphically measured God's "body," insisting such descriptions be allegorized to affirm God's absolute incorporeality (Guide for the Perplexed I:1-5).[121] In the Guide for the Perplexed, Maimonides reinterpreted Merkabah mysticism and prophetic visions as intellectual phenomena, where divine "chariot" imagery (Ma'aseh Merkabah) symbolized metaphysical hierarchies accessible only through prepared reason, not unmediated ecstasy (III:1-7).[122] He cautioned against public study of these topics without rigorous philosophical training, viewing unprepared engagement as perilous to faith (Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Yesodei HaTorah 2:12).[123] This stance demystified esoteric traditions, prioritizing causal understanding over theophanic encounters. Maimonides did not explicitly address mature Kabbalah, which coalesced post-1180 with texts like Sefer ha-Bahir, but his Aristotelian framework clashed with its emerging theosophic elements, such as sefirotic emanations implying divine multiplicity.[124] Early Kabbalists in Provence and Spain responded to his rationalism by developing alternative esoteric systems, often critiquing his rejection of literal sacred language and impurity ontologies as overly depersonalizing.[125] Scholars like Menachem Kellner argue Maimonides' "confrontation with mysticism" created a disenchanted Judaism, elitist in its intellectual demands yet universal in rational accessibility, influencing later tensions between philosophy and Kabbalah.[120] Despite this opposition, select interpreters discern a "philosophic mysticism" in Maimonides, wherein intellectual cleaving to the divine (devekut) via the Active Intellect achieves prophetic union, rationalized as overflow from separate intelligences rather than personal ecstasy (Guide III:51).[122] This view, however, remains contested, as Kabbalistic circles historically revered yet reinterpreted him, seeing esoteric layers in the Guide to harmonize with their tradition, though his explicit texts evince no such intent.[126] His legacy thus fueled debates, with rationalists upholding his anti-superstitious rigor against mysticism's allure.[127]Influence and Reception
Codification's Role in Jewish Legal Tradition
Maimonides' Mishneh Torah, completed between 1178 and 1180 CE, marked a transformative codification in Jewish legal tradition by compiling the full scope of the Oral Law into a rationalized, self-contained system of halakha.[128] Departing from the Talmud's dialectical structure, it eschewed debates, variant opinions, and source references to deliver unequivocal rulings in lucid Hebrew, organized topically across 14 books—from Sefer ha-Madda (Book of Knowledge), addressing metaphysics, ethics, and Torah study, to treatises on civil contracts, ritual purity, and even obsolete Temple rites preserved for potential messianic restoration.[128][35] This approach synthesized centuries of rabbinic material, drawing primarily from the Babylonian Talmud as the binding authority, to foster uniformity in practice amid the Diaspora’s dispersion and limited access to scholarly centers.[128] The work's explicit aim, as Maimonides outlined, was to render the Oral Law comprehensible to those versed only in the Written Torah, enabling autonomous observance of all 613 commandments without reliance on Talmudic exegesis or geonic interpretations.[128] By presenting halakha as a cohesive framework aligned with rational inquiry and natural order—echoing philosophical underpinnings in works like the Guide for the Perplexed—it sought to elevate individual moral perfection and communal stability, countering the interpretive anarchy post-Sanhedrin dissolution.[128] Innovations such as its hierarchical subdivision into sections, chapters, and halakhot further enhanced usability, making it a practical manual for judges, laypeople, and scholars alike, while including forward-looking provisions for kingship and warfare to anticipate sovereignty's return.[35][128] Though met with resistance—exemplified by glosses from Rabbi Abraham ben David of Posquières critiquing its decisiveness and source omission—the Mishneh Torah solidified as an authoritative cornerstone, especially in Sephardic and Yemenite rites where it holds near-canonical status.[35] Its formulations permeated later codices, including Jacob ben Asher's Arba'ah Turim (circa 1300 CE) and Joseph Karo's Shulchan Aruch (1565 CE), which often prioritized Maimonidean rulings absent Ashkenazic dissent, thus channeling halakhic evolution toward concise, precedent-based adjudication.[128] This legacy endures in rabbinic responsa, customary law, and even secular adaptations, as seen in Israeli courts and U.S. precedents invoking its self-defense principles, affirming its role in bridging ancient jurisprudence with enduring legal realism.[128]Impact on Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
Maimonides' Guide for the Perplexed, completed around 1190, established a framework for reconciling Aristotelian philosophy with Jewish theology, emphasizing rational interpretation of scripture and rejection of anthropomorphic conceptions of God, which became a cornerstone for medieval Jewish rationalism.[1] This synthesis influenced subsequent Jewish philosophers, including Levi ben Gershom (Gersonides, 1288–1344) and Hasdai Crescas (c. 1340–1410), who engaged critically with his metaphysical and epistemological positions while building upon his methodological approach to harmonizing faith and reason.[3] For over two centuries following his death in 1204, Maimonides exerted profound influence on virtually every medieval Jewish intellectual, shaping debates on the limits of human knowledge of God and the role of prophecy.[129] The Latin translation of the Guide, undertaken around the mid-13th century, introduced Maimonides' ideas to Christian scholasticism, facilitating cross-cultural philosophical exchange.[1] Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) engaged extensively with Maimonides, referencing him over 50 times in the Summa Theologica as "Rabbi Moyses," adopting elements of his negative theology—describing God via negation rather than positive attributes—and views on divine providence, while disputing claims like the impossibility of miracles or an eternal universe.[130] [131] Aquinas' incorporation of these ideas contributed to the Christian synthesis of Aristotle and revelation, underscoring Maimonides' role in mediating Greek philosophy to Latin Europe.[132] In the Renaissance period, Maimonides' emphasis on intellectual perfection and ethical rationalism resonated in Jewish philosophical circles, influencing figures like Judah Abravanel (c. 1460–1523), who drew on his ethical framework in Dialoghi d'Amore.[3] His works, preserved and commented upon in Hebrew and Latin editions, supported the era's renewed interest in ancient texts and rational inquiry, bridging medieval scholasticism with emerging humanist scholarship, though direct citations waned amid shifting intellectual currents.[133] This legacy affirmed Maimonides' enduring methodological impact, prioritizing empirical observation and logical deduction over uncritical tradition.[1]Legacy in Medicine, Science, and Rational Inquiry
Maimonides composed ten extant medical treatises in Arabic, drawing on Greco-Arabic sources such as Galen and Hippocrates while emphasizing empirical observation and preventive care.[1] His Treatise on Asthma, written around 1190 at the request of a royal patient suffering from the condition, outlined a comprehensive regimen including dietary moderation, environmental controls like avoiding dust and cold winds, and lifestyle adjustments to mitigate attacks, reflecting his holistic approach to disease management rooted in humoral theory yet attentive to individual causation.[134] In works like Regimen of Health and Medical Aphorisms—a compilation of approximately 1,500 directives—he advocated balanced nutrition, exercise, and emotional equilibrium as foundational to longevity, principles that anticipated modern public health emphases on lifestyle over mere symptom treatment.[135] These texts, translated into Hebrew and Latin, influenced medieval European medicine and remain studied for their integration of philosophy with clinical practice.[136] As court physician to Ayyubid Sultan Saladin from approximately 1171 until his death in 1204, Maimonides applied his rational methodology to diagnostics and therapeutics, describing conditions such as diabetes, hepatitis, and pneumonia with attention to etiology and prognosis.[136] His advocacy for early intervention and rejection of unproven remedies underscored a commitment to verifiable efficacy, aligning medicine with causal realism over superstition. This legacy persists in institutions like Rambam Medical Center in Haifa, Israel, established in 1938 and named in his honor (Rambam being an acronym for Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon), which continues to advance clinical research and care.[4] In science, Maimonides promoted the study of natural phenomena as a pathway to divine apprehension, arguing in Guide for the Perplexed (completed circa 1190) that astronomy, physics, and biology reveal God's orderly creation, thereby fostering rational piety rather than blind faith.[1] He critiqued anthropomorphic biblical interpretations through Aristotelian lenses, insisting that true knowledge of immutables like celestial mechanics demands empirical and logical scrutiny, influencing subsequent Jewish and Islamic scholars to prioritize observation over dogmatic assertion.[3] This framework elevated rational inquiry as essential for reconciling scripture with observable reality, countering mystical excesses and astrology as irrational deviations from causal principles.[137] Maimonides' enduring impact on rational inquiry lies in his insistence that reason illuminates revelation, positing no conflict between demonstrable truths and faith, as "no true faith without reason."[137] By framing scientific pursuits as religious imperatives—such as studying nature to emulate divine wisdom—he bridged theology and empiricism, a stance that resonated in later Enlightenment thought while facing opposition from traditionalists wary of over-rationalization.[138] His methodological caution against unsubstantiated claims, evident in medical and philosophical works alike, modeled skepticism toward unverified authorities, prioritizing evidence-derived conclusions in an era dominated by received wisdom.[1]Modern Scholarly Assessments and Criticisms
Modern scholars commend Maimonides for his systematic integration of Aristotelian philosophy with Jewish theology, viewing it as a foundational effort to prioritize intellectual perfection and rational inquiry in religious life. Kenneth Seeskin, in his 2016 work Maimonides for Moderns, adapts Maimonides' ethical framework to contemporary Jewish virtue ethics, translating medieval concepts into modern language while retaining their normative force to address everyday moral challenges, thereby demonstrating the enduring relevance of his approach beyond outdated Aristotelian metaphysics.[139] Similarly, Alfred Ivry highlights Maimonides' emphasis on demonstrable truth as a pursuit that aligns with scientific rigor, positioning him as a thinker whose rationalism prefigures modern epistemological standards, though one who remains "perplexed" by the limits of human understanding.[1] Critics, however, frequently target Maimonides' elitism, arguing that his typology of human perfection—reserving true knowledge of God for a select intellectual elite—contradicts egalitarian ideals prevalent in contemporary society. David Blumenthal describes Maimonides' teachings as graded across seven levels, with profound insights accessible only to the uppermost echelons of philosophers and prophets, rendering deeper piety post-intellectual and concealed from the masses through esoteric style.[140] This hierarchical structure, as noted in analyses of Guide for the Perplexed 3:51, privileges contemplative elites while assigning ritual observance to the broader populace, a division that scholars like Ivry see as offensively undemocratic to modern sensibilities.[1] Assessments of Maimonides' esotericism reveal ongoing debate, with Leo Strauss interpreting deliberate contradictions in the Guide as devices to veil truths from unprepared readers, a method essential for preserving social order but contested by scholars like Herbert Davidson who argue it overstates intentional obscurity.[1] Rationalism itself draws criticism for producing a conception of God as utterly incorporeal and negative in attributes, which some view as overly abstract and disconnected from experiential faith; for instance, Josef Stern's skeptical reading questions whether Maimonides' "necessary beliefs" constitute genuine knowledge or mere pragmatic concessions, failing to unify Jewish thought as intended and instead fostering divergent interpretations from mystical to conservative.[141] Moshe Halbertal further notes that Maimonides' codificatory ambitions in Mishneh Torah, aimed at streamlining halakhic study, paradoxically reinforced Talmudic traditionalism rather than supplanting it, underscoring limits to his transformative influence.[141]Cultural Tributes and Enduring Sites
The tomb of Maimonides in Tiberias, Israel, serves as a major Jewish pilgrimage site on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee, traditionally identified as his burial place following his death in Fustat (Cairo) on December 13, 1204.[142] The site includes an epitaph inscribed with the phrase "From Moses to Moses there arose none like Moses," reflecting his stature in Jewish tradition.[142] Local tradition also associates the location with burials of his father, grandson, and other sages like Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakai.[32] In Fez, Morocco, the house associated with Maimonides marks the period of his residence during Almohad persecution in the 1140s, where he reportedly composed his Epistle on Persecution.[143] The structure, now linked to the Dar al-Magana building, features a marble plaque denoting its historical connection and has functioned as a Jewish pilgrimage site.[144] Maimonides' birthplace in Córdoba, Spain, where he was born in 1138, is commemorated by a bronze seated statue sculpted by Amadeo Olmos Ruiz, inaugurated on June 7, 1964, in Plaza de Tiberíades within the Jewish Quarter near the historic synagogue.[145] This monument honors his early life in the city during the final phases of the Golden Age of Jewish culture under Muslim rule.[146] Cultural tributes include a marble relief portrait of Maimonides installed over a gallery door in the U.S. House of Representatives chamber, part of a series depicting historical figures for their contributions to law, philosophy, and governance, added in the 19th century.[147] The Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York, formed in 1947 from the merger of Beth Moses Hospital and others, recognizes his medical legacy as a 12th-century physician.[148] Israel has featured Maimonides on postage stamps, including a 1953 issue and a 2005 commemorative for the 800th anniversary of his death, alongside a one new sheqel banknote depicting his portrait issued by the Bank of Israel.[149][150] These philatelic and numismatic honors underscore his enduring influence across Jewish and broader intellectual traditions.References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Eight_chapters_of_Maimonides_on_Ethics/Introduction
