Hubbry Logo
BiogeographyBiogeographyMain
Open search
Biogeography
Community hub
Biogeography
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Biogeography
Biogeography
Biogeography
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Frontispiece to Alfred Russel Wallace's book The Geographical Distribution of Animals
Part of a series on
Evolutionary biology
Darwin's finches by John Gould
Processes and outcomes
Natural history
History of evolutionary theory
Fields and applications
Social implications

Biogeography is the study of the distribution of species and ecosystems in geographic space and through geological time. Organisms and biological communities often vary in a regular fashion along geographic gradients of latitude, elevation, isolation and habitat area.[1] Phytogeography is the branch of biogeography that studies the distribution of plants, Zoogeography is the branch that studies distribution of animals, while Mycogeography is the branch that studies distribution of fungi, such as mushrooms.

Knowledge of spatial variation in the numbers and types of organisms is as vital to us today as it was to our early human ancestors, as we adapt to heterogeneous but geographically predictable environments. Biogeography is an integrative field of inquiry that unites concepts and information from ecology, evolutionary biology, taxonomy, geology, physical geography, palaeontology, and climatology.[2][3]

Modern biogeographic research combines information and ideas from many fields, from the physiological and ecological constraints on organismal dispersal to geological and climatological phenomena operating at global spatial scales and evolutionary time frames.

The short-term interactions within a habitat and species of organisms describe the ecological application of biogeography. Historical biogeography describes the long-term, evolutionary periods of time for broader classifications of organisms.[4] Early scientists, beginning with Carl Linnaeus, contributed to the development of biogeography as a science.

The scientific theory of biogeography grows out of the work of Alexander von Humboldt (1769–1859),[5] Francisco Jose de Caldas (1768–1816),[6] Hewett Cottrell Watson (1804–1881),[7] Alphonse de Candolle (1806–1893),[8] Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913),[9] Philip Lutley Sclater (1829–1913) and other biologists and explorers.[10]

Introduction

[edit]

The patterns of species distribution across geographical areas can usually be explained through a combination of historical factors such as: speciation, extinction, continental drift, and glaciation. Through observing the geographic distribution of species, we can see associated variations in sea level, river routes, habitat, and river capture. Additionally, this science considers the geographic constraints of landmass areas and isolation, as well as the available ecosystem energy supplies.[citation needed]

Over periods of ecological changes, biogeography includes the study of plant and animal species in: their past and/or present living refugium habitat; their interim living sites; and/or their survival locales.[11] As David Quammen put it, "...biogeography does more than ask Which species? and Where. It also asks Why? and, what is sometimes more crucial, Why not?."[12]

Modern biogeography often employs the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), to understand the factors affecting organism distribution, and to predict future trends in organism distribution.[13] Often mathematical models and GIS are employed to solve ecological problems that have a spatial aspect to them.[14]

Biogeography is most keenly observed on the world's islands. These habitats are often much more manageable areas of study because they are more condensed than larger ecosystems on the mainland.[15] Islands are also ideal locations because they allow scientists to look at habitats that new invasive species have only recently colonized and can observe how they disperse throughout the island and change it. They can then apply their understanding to similar but more complex mainland habitats. Islands are very diverse in their biomes, ranging from the tropical to arctic climates. This diversity in habitat allows for a wide range of species study in different parts of the world.

One scientist who recognized the importance of these geographic locations was Charles Darwin, who remarked in his journal "The Zoology of Archipelagoes will be well worth examination".[15] Two chapters in On the Origin of Species were devoted to geographical distribution.

History

[edit]

18th century

[edit]

The first discoveries that contributed to the development of biogeography as a science began in the mid-18th century, as Europeans explored the world and described the biodiversity of life. During the 18th century most views on the world were shaped around religion and for many natural theologists, the bible. Carl Linnaeus, in the mid-18th century, improved our classifications of organisms through the exploration of undiscovered territories by his students and disciples. When he noticed that species were not as perpetual as he believed, he developed the Mountain Explanation to explain the distribution of biodiversity; when Noah's ark landed on Mount Ararat and the waters receded, the animals dispersed throughout different elevations on the mountain. This showed different species in different climates proving species were not constant.[4] Linnaeus' findings set a basis for ecological biogeography. Through his strong beliefs in Christianity, he was inspired to classify the living world, which then gave way to additional accounts of secular views on geographical distribution.[10] He argued that the structure of an animal was very closely related to its physical surroundings. This was important to a George Louis Buffon's rival theory of distribution.[10]

Closely after Linnaeus, Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon observed shifts in climate and how species spread across the globe as a result. He was the first to see different groups of organisms in different regions of the world. Buffon saw similarities between some regions which led him to believe that at one point continents were connected and then water separated them and caused differences in species. His hypotheses were described in his work, the 36 volume Histoire Naturelle, générale et particulière, in which he argued that varying geographical regions would have different forms of life. This was inspired by his observations comparing the Old and New World, as he determined distinct variations of species from the two regions. Buffon believed there was a single species creation event, and that different regions of the world were homes for varying species, which is an alternate view than that of Linnaeus. Buffon's law eventually became a principle of biogeography by explaining how similar environments were habitats for comparable types of organisms.[10] Buffon also studied fossils which led him to believe that the Earth was over tens of thousands of years old, and that humans had not lived there long in comparison to the age of the Earth.[4]

19th century

[edit]

Following the period of exploration came the Age of Enlightenment in Europe, which attempted to explain the patterns of biodiversity observed by Buffon and Linnaeus. At the birth of the 19th century, Alexander von Humboldt, known as the "founder of plant geography",[4] developed the concept of physique generale to demonstrate the unity of science and how species fit together. As one of the first to contribute empirical data to the science of biogeography through his travel as an explorer, he observed differences in climate and vegetation. The Earth was divided into regions which he defined as tropical, temperate, and arctic and within these regions there were similar forms of vegetation.[4] This ultimately enabled him to create the isotherm, which allowed scientists to see patterns of life within different climates.[4] He contributed his observations to findings of botanical geography by previous scientists, and sketched this description of both the biotic and abiotic features of the Earth in his book, Cosmos.[10]

Augustin de Candolle contributed to the field of biogeography as he observed species competition and the several differences that influenced the discovery of the diversity of life. He was a Swiss botanist and created the first Laws of Botanical Nomenclature in his work, Prodromus.[16] He discussed plant distribution and his theories eventually had a great impact on Charles Darwin, who was inspired to consider species adaptations and evolution after learning about botanical geography. De Candolle was the first to describe the differences between the small-scale and large-scale distribution patterns of organisms around the globe.[10]

Several additional scientists contributed new theories to further develop the concept of biogeography. Charles Lyell developed the Theory of Uniformitarianism after studying fossils. This theory explained how the world was not created by one sole catastrophic event, but instead from numerous creation events and locations.[17] Uniformitarianism also introduced the idea that the Earth was actually significantly older than was previously accepted. Using this knowledge, Lyell concluded that it was possible for species to go extinct.[18] Since he noted that Earth's climate changes, he realized that species distribution must also change accordingly. Lyell argued that climate changes complemented vegetation changes, thus connecting the environmental surroundings to varying species. This largely influenced Charles Darwin in his development of the theory of evolution.[10]

Charles Darwin was a natural theologist who studied around the world, and most importantly in the Galapagos Islands. Darwin introduced the idea of natural selection, as he theorized against previously accepted ideas that species were static or unchanging. His contributions to biogeography and the theory of evolution were different from those of other explorers of his time, because he developed a mechanism to describe the ways that species changed. His influential ideas include the development of theories regarding the struggle for existence and natural selection. Darwin's theories started a biological segment to biogeography and empirical studies, which enabled future scientists to develop ideas about the geographical distribution of organisms around the globe.[10]

Alfred Russel Wallace studied the distribution of flora and fauna in the Amazon Basin and the Malay Archipelago in the mid-19th century. His research was essential to the further development of biogeography, and he was later nicknamed the "father of Biogeography". Wallace conducted fieldwork researching the habits, breeding and migration tendencies, and feeding behavior of thousands of species. He studied butterfly and bird distributions in comparison to the presence or absence of geographical barriers. His observations led him to conclude that the number of organisms present in a community was dependent on the amount of food resources in the particular habitat.[10] Wallace believed species were dynamic by responding to biotic and abiotic factors. He and Philip Sclater saw biogeography as a source of support for the theory of evolution as they used Darwin's conclusion to explain how biogeography was similar to a record of species inheritance.[10] Key findings, such as the sharp difference in fauna either side of the Wallace Line, and the sharp difference that existed between North and South America prior to their relatively recent faunal interchange, can only be understood in this light. Otherwise, the field of biogeography would be seen as a purely descriptive one.[4]

20th and 21st century

[edit]
Schematic distribution of fossils on Pangea according to Wegener

Moving on to the 20th century, Alfred Wegener introduced the Theory of Continental Drift in 1912, though it was not widely accepted until the 1960s.[4] This theory was revolutionary because it changed the way that everyone thought about species and their distribution around the globe. The theory explained how continents were formerly joined in one large landmass, Pangea, and slowly drifted apart due to the movement of the plates below Earth's surface. The evidence for this theory is in the geological similarities between varying locations around the globe, the geographic distribution of some fossils (including the mesosaurs) on various continents, and the jigsaw puzzle shape of the landmasses on Earth. Though Wegener did not know the mechanism of this concept of Continental Drift, this contribution to the study of biogeography was significant in the way that it shed light on the importance of environmental and geographic similarities or differences as a result of climate and other pressures on the planet. Importantly, late in his career Wegener recognised that testing his theory required measurement of continental movement rather than inference from fossils species distributions.[19]

In 1958 paleontologist Paul S. Martin published A Biogeography of Reptiles and Amphibians in the Gómez Farias Region, Tamaulipas, Mexico, which has been described as "ground-breaking"[20]: 35 p.  and "a classic treatise in historical biogeography".[21]: 311 p.  Martin applied several disciplines including ecology, botany, climatology, geology, and Pleistocene dispersal routes to examine the herpetofauna of a relatively small and largely undisturbed area, but ecologically complex, situated on the threshold of temperate – tropical (nearctic and neotropical) regions, including semiarid lowlands at 70 meters elevation and the northernmost cloud forest in the western hemisphere at over 2200 meters.[20][21][22]

Biologist Edward O. Wilson, coauthored The Theory of Island Biogeography, which helped in stimulating much research on this topic in the late 20th and 21st. centuries.

The publication of The Theory of Island Biogeography by Robert MacArthur and E.O. Wilson in 1967[23] showed that the species richness of an area could be predicted in terms of such factors as habitat area, immigration rate and extinction rate. This added to the long-standing interest in island biogeography. The application of island biogeography theory to habitat fragments spurred the development of the fields of conservation biology and landscape ecology.[24]

Classic biogeography has been expanded by the development of molecular systematics, creating a new discipline known as phylogeography. This development allowed scientists to test theories about the origin and dispersal of populations, such as island endemics. For example, while classic biogeographers were able to speculate about the origins of species in the Hawaiian Islands, phylogeography allows them to test theories of relatedness between these populations and putative source populations on various continents, notably in Asia and North America.[15]

Biogeography continues as a point of study for many life sciences and geography students worldwide, however it may be under different broader titles within institutions such as ecology or evolutionary biology.

In recent years, one of the most important and consequential developments in biogeography has been to show how multiple organisms, including mammals like monkeys and reptiles like squamates, overcame barriers such as large oceans that many biogeographers formerly believed were impossible to cross.[25] See also Oceanic dispersal.

Modern applications

[edit]
Biogeographic regions of Europe

Biogeography now incorporates many different fields including but not limited to physical geography, geology, botany and plant biology, zoology, general biology, and modelling. A biogeographer's main focus is on how the environment and humans affect the distribution of species as well as other manifestations of Life such as species or genetic diversity. Biogeography is being applied to biodiversity conservation and planning, projecting global environmental changes on species and biomes, projecting the spread of infectious diseases, invasive species, and for supporting planning for the establishment of crops. Technological evolving and advances have allowed for generating a whole suite of predictor variables for biogeographic analysis, including satellite imaging and processing of the Earth.[26] Two main types of satellite imaging that are important within modern biogeography are Global Production Efficiency Model (GLO-PEM) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). GLO-PEM uses satellite-imaging gives "repetitive, spatially contiguous, and time specific observations of vegetation". These observations are on a global scale.[27] GIS can show certain processes on the earth's surface like whale locations, sea surface temperatures, and bathymetry.[28] Current scientists also use coral reefs to delve into the history of biogeography through the fossilized reefs.[citation needed]

Two global information systems are either dedicated to, or have strong focus on, biogeography (in the form of the spatial location of observations of organisms), namely the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF: 2.57 billion species occurrence records reported as at August 2023)[29] and, for marine species only, the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS, originally the Ocean Biogeographic Information System: 116 million species occurrence records reported as at August 2023),[30] while at a national scale, similar compilations of species occurrence records also exist such as the U.K. National Biodiversity Network, the Atlas of Living Australia, and many others. In the case of the oceans, in 2017 Costello et al. analyzed the distribution of 65,000 species of marine animals and plants as then documented in OBIS, and used the results to distinguish 30 distinct marine realms, split between continental-shelf and offshore deep-sea areas.[31]

Since it is self evident that compilations of species occurrence records cannot cover with any completeness, areas that have received either limited or no sampling, a number of methods have been developed to produce arguably more complete "predictive" or "modelled" distributions for species based on their associated environmental or other preferences (such as availability of food or other habitat requirements); this approach is known as either Environmental niche modelling (ENM) or Species distribution modelling (SDM). Depending on the reliability of the source data and the nature of the models employed (including the scales for which data are available), maps generated from such models may then provide better representations of the "real" biogeographic distributions of either individual species, groups of species, or biodiversity as a whole, however it should also be borne in mind that historic or recent human activities (such as hunting of great whales, or other human-induced exterminations) may have altered present-day species distributions from their potential "full" ecological footprint. Examples of predictive maps produced by niche modelling methods based on either GBIF (terrestrial) or OBIS (marine, plus some freshwater) data are the former Lifemapper project at the University of Kansas (now continued as a part of BiotaPhy[32]) and AquaMaps, which as at 2023 contain modelled distributions for around 200,000 terrestrial, and 33,000 species of teleosts, marine mammals and invertebrates, respectively.[32][33] One advantage of ENM/SDM is that in addition to showing current (or even past) modelled distributions, insertion of changed parameters such as the anticipated effects of climate change can also be used to show potential changes in species distributions that may occur in the future based on such scenarios.[34]

Paleobiogeography

[edit]
See also: Dinosaur paleobiogeography
Distribution of four Permian and Triassic fossil groups used as biogeographic evidence for continental drift, and land bridging

Paleobiogeography goes one step further to include paleogeographic data and considerations of plate tectonics. Using molecular analyses and corroborated by fossils, it has been possible to demonstrate that perching birds evolved first in the region of Australia or the adjacent Antarctic (which at that time lay somewhat further north and had a temperate climate). From there, they spread to the other Gondwanan continents and Southeast Asia – the part of Laurasia then closest to their origin of dispersal – in the late Paleogene, before achieving a global distribution in the early Neogene.[35] Not knowing that at the time of dispersal, the Indian Ocean was much narrower than it is today, and that South America was closer to the Antarctic, one would be hard pressed to explain the presence of many "ancient" lineages of perching birds in Africa, as well as the mainly South American distribution of the suboscines.[citation needed]

Paleobiogeography also helps constrain hypotheses on the timing of biogeographic events such as vicariance and geodispersal, and provides unique information on the formation of regional biotas. For example, data from species-level phylogenetic and biogeographic studies tell us that the Amazonian teleost fauna accumulated in increments over a period of tens of millions of years, principally by means of allopatric speciation, and in an arena extending over most of the area of tropical South America.[36] In other words, unlike some of the well-known insular faunas (Galapagos finches, Hawaiian drosophilid flies, African rift lake cichlids), the species-rich Amazonian ichthyofauna is not the result of recent adaptive radiations.[37]

For freshwater organisms, landscapes are divided naturally into discrete drainage basins by watersheds, episodically isolated and reunited by erosional processes. In regions like the Amazon Basin (or more generally Greater Amazonia, the Amazon basin, Orinoco basin, and Guianas) with an exceptionally low (flat) topographic relief, the many waterways have had a highly reticulated history over geological time. In such a context, stream capture is an important factor affecting the evolution and distribution of freshwater organisms. Stream capture occurs when an upstream portion of one river drainage is diverted to the downstream portion of an adjacent basin. This can happen as a result of tectonic uplift (or subsidence), natural damming created by a landslide, or headward or lateral erosion of the watershed between adjacent basins.[37]

Concepts and fields

[edit]

Biogeography is a synthetic science, related to geography, biology, soil science, geology, climatology, ecology and evolution.

Some fundamental concepts in biogeography include:

  • allopatric speciation – the splitting of a species by evolution of geographically isolated populations
  • evolution – change in genetic composition of a population
  • extinction – disappearance of a species
  • dispersal – movement of populations away from their point of origin, related to migration
  • endemic areas
  • geodispersal – the erosion of barriers to biotic dispersal and gene flow, that permit range expansion and the merging of previously isolated biotas
  • range and distribution
  • vicariance – the formation of barriers to biotic dispersal and gene flow, that tend to subdivide species and biotas, leading to speciation and extinction; vicariance biogeography is the field that studies these patterns

Comparative biogeography

[edit]

The study of comparative biogeography can follow two main lines of investigation:[38]

  • Systematic biogeography, the study of biotic area relationships, their distribution, and hierarchical classification
  • Evolutionary biogeography, the proposal of evolutionary mechanisms responsible for organismal distributions. Possible mechanisms include widespread taxa disrupted by continental break-up or individual episodes of long-distance movement.

Biogeographic units

[edit]

There are many types of biogeographic units used in biogeographic regionalisation schemes,[39][40][41] as there are many criteria (species composition, physiognomy, ecological aspects) and hierarchization schemes: biogeographic realms (ecozones), bioregions (sensu stricto), ecoregions, zoogeographical regions, floristic regions, vegetation types, biomes, etc.

The terms biogeographic unit[39] or biogeographic area[42] can be used for these regions, regardless of where they fall in any hierarchy.

In 2008, an International Code of Area Nomenclature was proposed for biogeography.[42][43][44] It achieved limited success; some studies commented favorably on it, but others were much more critical,[45] and it "has not yet gained a significant following".[46] Similarly, a set of rules for paleobiogeography[47] has achieved limited success.[46][48] In 2000, Westermann suggested that the difficulties in getting formal nomenclatural rules established in this field might be related to "the curious fact that neither paleo- nor neobiogeographers are organized in any formal groupings or societies, nationally (so far as I know) or internationally — an exception among active disciplines."[49]

See also

[edit]

Notes and references

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Biogeography

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Biogeography is the scientific discipline that examines the spatial distributions of organisms—ranging from genes to ecosystems—and the evolutionary, ecological, and geological processes that generate these patterns across both contemporary landscapes and deep time. Pioneered in the 19th century by naturalists including Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin, the field drew on empirical observations of species disjunctions and endemism to support theories of descent with modification, revealing how isolation fosters divergence. Wallace, through extensive fieldwork in the Malay Archipelago, identified sharp faunal boundaries such as Wallace's Line and proposed six major biogeographic realms, providing a foundational framework for classifying global biodiversity hotspots and transition zones. The integration of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century shifted emphasis toward vicariance—continental fragmentation—as a primary driver of historical distributions, complementing earlier dispersal-focused explanations and enabling reconstructions of ancient land connections via fossil and phylogenetic evidence. Contemporary biogeography employs molecular tools, climate data, and spatial modeling to dissect mechanisms like range shifts under environmental change, informing conservation strategies amid anthropogenic pressures such as habitat fragmentation and species invasions.

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Biogeography is the study of the geographic distribution of , ecosystems, and patterns across space and through time, including the biological and abiotic processes that generate these distributions. This discipline examines variations in life forms—from genetic and morphological traits to community assemblages—at all taxonomic levels, integrating causal mechanisms such as dispersal, , and environmental gradients. Core to its framework is the analysis of how historical contingencies, like tectonic movements since the breakup of approximately 200 million years ago, interact with contemporary ecological filters to shape observed patterns. The scope extends to both ecological and historical subfields. Ecological biogeography investigates current distributions influenced by factors including , , and interspecies interactions, often employing models to predict range shifts under scenarios like global temperature increases of 1.5–4°C projected by 2100. Historical biogeography reconstructs ancestral ranges and vicariance events using phylogenetic and records, revealing how barriers such as basins have isolated lineages, as evidenced by congruent distributions of marsupials in and . Together, these approaches quantify metrics like , which measures turnover in species composition across regions, typically ranging from 0.2–0.8 in global datasets. Biogeography's analytical boundaries emphasize empirical patterns over normative interpretations, prioritizing testable hypotheses derived from field data, genomic sequencing, and paleontological evidence rather than unsubstantiated generalizations. It excludes purely descriptive cataloging, focusing instead on causal explanations that account for rates, such as the 80–90% unique in isolated hotspots like , attributable to prolonged geographic isolation spanning 88 million years. This scope informs applications in predicting risks, where dispersal limitations explain why 20–30% of may fail to track shifting habitats under rapid .

Scientific Importance

Biogeography reveals the spatial and temporal distributions of taxa, integrating evolutionary history with environmental drivers to explain patterns. By analyzing disjunct distributions and , it provides empirical support for mechanisms of , such as allopatric divergence due to barriers like oceans or mountains. Historical biogeography, in particular, reconstructs ancestral ranges using phylogenetic data, testing hypotheses of vicariance events tied to , as evidenced by congruent distributions across now-separated landmasses. The field underpins ecological theory by quantifying how abiotic factors—, —and biotic interactions shape community assembly and range limits. Island biogeography theory, formalized in 1967, predicts as a function of island size and isolation, validated through empirical studies on arthropods and birds, influencing models. This predictive framework extends to mainland systems, aiding in the assessment of risks from habitat loss. In , biogeography identifies priority areas by mapping evolutionary distinctiveness and threat overlap, as in the delineation of hotspots harboring 50% of species despite covering only 2.3% of Earth's land surface. It informs management by tracing dispersal pathways and predicts shifts in distributions under , with models projecting poleward range expansions averaging 16.8 km per decade for terrestrial species since 1960. Furthermore, functional biogeography links trait distributions to processes, enhancing forecasts of carbon cycling alterations in response to warming. These applications underscore biogeography's role in for impacts, prioritizing data from long-term monitoring over anecdotal reports.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern Observations

Ancient Greek philosophers provided some of the earliest systematic observations on the geographical distribution of organisms. (384–322 BCE), drawing from dissections and field studies particularly around , classified over 500 animal species and noted their confinement to specific habitats and regions, such as certain endemic to Aegean coastal waters and terrestrial animals adapted to particular terrains like marshes or mountains. His works, including Historia Animalium, emphasized empirical variations in morphology and tied to local environments, laying groundwork for recognizing distributional patterns without invoking migration or . Theophrastus (c. 371–287 BCE), succeeding as head of the , advanced botanical inquiries in Historia Plantarum and related geographical texts, cataloging approximately 500 and observing their dependencies on climate, soil, and ; for example, he documented tropical like the flourishing in and Arabia but failing in cooler , based on reports from pupils across the Mediterranean. These accounts highlighted barriers to plant spread, such as temperature gradients, and included notes on exotic from and obtained via trade routes. Roman compilations extended these insights through synthesis rather than novel fieldwork. (23–79 CE), in Naturalis Historia, aggregated classical and contemporary reports on faunal differences across continents, detailing regional endemics like African and Indian elephants with distinct traits and distributions, as well as marine varying by (e.g., larger whales in outer oceans versus coastal varieties). Such observations underscored empirical disparities in assemblages between , , and , often attributed to divine placement or environmental suitability rather than dynamic processes. Medieval European scholarship largely preserved and annotated Greco-Roman texts amid limited exploration, with figures like (c. 1193–1280) incorporating local Germanic flora into Aristotelian frameworks in De Vegetabilibus et Plantis, noting variations in plant hardiness across latitudes. The era's voyages of discovery (c. 1400–1600) yielded transformative empirical data, as Portuguese and Spanish expeditions documented unprecedented biogeographical discontinuities; for instance, Amerigo Vespucci's 1499–1502 accounts described South American mammals (e.g., tapirs, jaguars) absent in or , and absence of large herbivores like in the . These findings, disseminated in early herbals and travelogues, revealed vast realms of endemic species, prompting initial causal inquiries into isolation by oceans and prompting reevaluation of fixed creation models.

18th and 19th Century Foundations

In the 18th century, (1707–1788), laid early groundwork for biogeography through observations of faunal differences between continents. He noted that species in the differed markedly from those in despite similar latitudes and climates, attributing this to geographical isolation rather than environmental degeneracy. This insight, formalized as Buffon's Law, established that environmentally comparable but isolated regions support distinct biotas, marking the first explicit principle of biogeography. Early 19th-century advancements came from (1769–1859), who pioneered systematic plant geography during expeditions to the from 1799 to 1804. In his Essay on the Geography of Plants (1807), Humboldt correlated vegetation zones with altitude, , and , creating isothermal charts and vegetation profiles that demonstrated predictable patterns in species distributions driven by abiotic gradients. These works emphasized empirical measurement and causal links between physical environments and biotic assemblages, influencing later quantitative approaches. By mid-century, Philip Lutley Sclater (1829–1913) introduced a formal classification of global zoogeographic regions in 1858, delineating six primary divisions—Palaearctic, Ethiopian, Indian, Australian, Nearctic, and Neotropical—based on avian distributions. This framework highlighted discontinuities in faunal composition across barriers like oceans and mountains, providing a foundational map for understanding large-scale patterns. The evolutionary synthesis in the late 19th century, driven by (1809–1882) and (1823–1913), integrated biogeography with descent by modification. Darwin's (1859) drew on voyage observations, such as Galápagos mockingbirds and finches varying by island, to argue that isolation promotes speciation through . Wallace's The Geographical Distribution of Animals (1876), a two-volume synthesis, refined Sclater's regions into zoogeographic provinces, coined terms like "Wallace's Line" for sharp faunal boundaries in the , and linked distributions to historical geological changes and dispersal limitations. These contributions shifted biogeography toward causal explanations rooted in and earth history, rejecting static creationist views.

20th Century Advancements

The acceptance of theory in the mid-1960s, following evidence presented by Harry Hess in 1962 and and Matthews in 1963, fundamentally shifted biogeographic explanations from ad hoc long-distance dispersal to vicariance driven by continental fragmentation. This paradigm reconciled disjunct distributions, such as matching fossils across now-separated landmasses, with geological causality rather than improbable transoceanic crossings. Léon Croizat's panbiogeography, outlined in his 1958 work Panbiogeography, introduced "tracks" as generalized patterns of distribution aligning with tectonic features, challenging center-of-origin models by prioritizing earth history over organismal agency. Building on this, the vicariance biogeography school emerged in the 1970s, led by Gareth Nelson and Norman Platnick at the , which integrated Croizat's insights with cladistic methods to test congruence among area cladograms for multiple taxa, hypothesizing shared vicariance events. Willi Hennig's Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik (1950), translated as Phylogenetic Systematics in 1966, formalized by emphasizing monophyletic groups defined by shared derived characters, providing tools for reconstructing ancestor-descendant sequences independent of time or . This enabled cladistic biogeography, where area relationships derived from taxon phylogenies reveal historical events like fragmentation, as applied by Lars Brundin to in 1966. In 1967, and Edward O. Wilson published , a equating number on islands to dynamic equilibrium between immigration (decreasing with isolation) and extinction (increasing with smaller area), validated empirically on archipelagos like the with species-area regressions (S = cA^z, where z ≈ 0.2–0.3). The framework extended to habitat fragments, influencing conservation by predicting minimum viable areas. These developments collectively emphasized testable mechanisms—geological, phylogenetic, and ecological—over narrative dispersal, fostering quantitative rigor in the field.

Post-2000 Innovations

The advent of high-throughput technologies in the early 2000s enabled to shift from descriptive analyses to statistically rigorous inferences of , migration, and times using coalescent-based models and approximate Bayesian . This integration of genomic data with geospatial tools, such as GIS, allowed for explicit testing of phylogeographic hypotheses against landscape features and paleoenvironmental reconstructions, revealing finer-scale processes like cryptic refugia during glacial cycles. By 2010, comparative had expanded to multi-species frameworks, facilitating the identification of shared barriers to across taxa and enhancing understanding of regional biogeographic congruence. Conservation biogeography emerged as a distinct subfield in 2005, explicitly applying island biogeography theory, dispersal-vicariance models, and spatial analyses to address anthropogenic threats like habitat fragmentation and invasive species spread. Practitioners utilized species distribution models (SDMs), refined post-2000 with machine learning algorithms and ensemble forecasting, to predict range shifts under climate change scenarios, incorporating variables like soil type, elevation, and biotic interactions for more robust projections. This approach informed protected area prioritization, as evidenced by global assessments showing that incorporating phylogenetic diversity into reserve design could capture 10-20% more evolutionary history than area-alone strategies. A "new modern synthesis" in biogeography coalesced around 2019, fusing phylogenomics, macroecology, and paleodata with and platforms to model continental-scale patterns and forecast responses to rapid . For instance, analyses of millions of records recalibrated global plant biogeography, determining that annual comprise only 6% of angiosperms—half prior estimates—due to improved sampling and trait-based classifications. These innovations underscored causal links between abiotic drivers and biotic assembly, prioritizing empirical validation over correlative patterns in policy-relevant applications like risk .

Core Mechanisms

Dispersal and Barriers

Dispersal refers to the movement of organisms or their propagules (such as seeds, spores, or larvae) from an occupied area to a new one, enabling range expansion, of unoccupied habitats, and avoidance of or . In biogeography, dispersal operates through distinct phases: from the source , transience across intervening space, and successful settlement in the target area, each incurring fitness costs like mortality during transit but offering benefits such as access to resources. Mechanisms include active locomotion (e.g., walking or flying in mobile animals) and passive vectors like (for lightweight diaspores), currents (e.g., oceanic rafting of seeds or logs carrying ), or animal-mediated transport (e.g., endozoochory via or epizoochory via attachment to ). Long-distance dispersal (LDD), defined as propagule movement exceeding typical routine ranges and often spanning hundreds to thousands of kilometers, is rare—occurring with probabilities below 1 in 10,000 for many —but pivotal for explaining disjunct distributions, such as the of remote oceanic islands never connected to continental landmasses. Barriers to dispersal impede this process, fragmenting populations and restricting , which fosters and when combined with local adaptation. Physical barriers include insurmountable geographic features like oceans, mountain ranges (e.g., the limiting east-west in South American taxa), and deserts, which exceed the dispersal capacity of non-volant species. Climatic barriers, such as extreme temperature gradients or aridity zones, act indirectly by rendering habitats unsuitable during transit, while biotic factors like predator densities or competitor exclusion further constrain settlement. Human-induced barriers, including from roads and , have intensified since the , reducing population connectivity and in fragmented landscapes; for instance, riverine barriers in the Amazon have demonstrably lowered avian , promoting phylogeographic breaks. In severe cases, "sweepstakes" routes—barriers permitting only , low-probability crossings—explain founder events, as seen in the rare arrival of South American biota to the Galápagos Islands via ocean currents. The interplay between dispersal and barriers underscores causal drivers of biogeographic patterns: permeable barriers allow recurrent , homogenizing populations, whereas impermeable ones amplify isolation, with empirical studies showing dispersal limitation correlating with elevated rates in vertebrates across deep biogeographic divides. Quantifying dispersal efficacy remains challenging due to its rarity, but models integrating traits like body size and life history reveal that larger-bodied tetrapods exhibit fewer transoceanic events, emphasizing barrier strength in shaping historical distributions.

Vicariance and Geological Drivers

Vicariance refers to the division of a continuous into isolated subpopulations by the of a geographic barrier, promoting through in separated lineages. This process contrasts with dispersal by emphasizing passive fragmentation rather than active colonization, with barriers arising from extrinsic geological changes rather than organismal movement. In historical biogeography, vicariance hypotheses are tested against phylogenetic trees and dated divergence events to infer barrier timings, often revealing congruent patterns across multiple taxa indicative of shared geological histories. Plate tectonics serves as the primary geological driver of vicariance, with continental rifting and subduction zones fragmenting landmasses and marine habitats over millions of years. The breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea, initiating around 200 million years ago during the Late Triassic, exemplifies this mechanism: as Laurasia and Gondwana separated, ancestral ranges of terrestrial vertebrates and plants were sundered, leading to elevated speciation rates in isolated fragments where vicariance exceeded extinction. Quantitative models demonstrate that such drift-induced isolation boosts global diversification only when vicariant splits generate novel adaptive opportunities, as evidenced by simulations incorporating 540 million years of tectonic history. For instance, the mid-Cretaceous separation of South America from Africa approximately 100 million years ago produced disjunct distributions in cichlid fishes and other groups, with molecular phylogenies aligning divergence times to rifting events rather than trans-Atlantic jumps. Other geological processes, including orogenic uplift and epeirogenic movements, contribute to vicariance by erecting terrestrial barriers or altering drainage basins. Mountain-building episodes, such as the uplift of the around 10-20 million years ago, isolated Amazonian populations, fostering in amphibians and through river capture and . Sea-level fluctuations driven by tectonic or glacial cycles further enable vicariance in coastal and insular systems, as seen in the Pleistocene isolation of Aegean island populations of endemic reptiles, where amplified divergence post-barrier formation. These drivers underscore vicariance's role in shaping hotspots, with empirical support from integrated phylogeographic and paleontological data confirming causal links between tectonic events and lineage splits.

Abiotic and Biotic Factors

Abiotic factors, encompassing non-living environmental components such as , , composition, , and ocean currents, impose physiological tolerances that delimit ' potential ranges in biogeography. For instance, temperature gradients often establish trailing edge limits at lower latitudes or altitudes through or metabolic stress, while precipitation deficits restrict arid-adapted to specific climatic envelopes. Topographical barriers like mountain ranges create rain shadows that alter moisture availability, influencing elevational distributions as seen in Andean clines where correlates with thermal lapse rates of approximately 6.5°C per kilometer. Ocean currents, such as the cooling Peru's coast, foster endemic marine assemblages by maintaining viability thresholds below 20°C. These factors operate via direct causal mechanisms, filtering dispersal outcomes and enforcing niche conservatism where cannot physiologically tolerate deviations beyond 2-5°C from optimal means. Biotic factors involve living interactions, including , predation, mutualism, and , which modulate realized distributions beyond abiotic tolerances. Predation pressure, for example, confines ranges in African savannas where densities exceed 0.1 individuals per km², reducing persistence in high-risk zones despite suitable climate. Competitive exclusion principles explain turnover in plant communities, as evidenced by invasive species displacing natives in Australian fynbos through superior resource uptake, altering local by up to 30%. Mutualistic dependencies, like specificity in orchids, restrict distributions to regions with co-occurring vectors, with breakdowns observed in fragmented habitats where visitation rates drop below 10% of intact levels. Pathogen loads further constrain ranges, as in amphibian chytridiomycosis outbreaks limiting distributions to elevations above 1,000 meters in . The interplay of abiotic and biotic factors reveals scale-dependent dominance, with abiotic controls prevailing at macroecological scales—explaining 60-80% of variance in global models—while biotic interactions refine local patch dynamics and range edges. Synergistic effects amplify constraints, such as (abiotic) exacerbating herbivory (biotic) in reducing tree recruitment by 50% in semi-arid woodlands. Empirical models incorporating both, like MaxEnt projections for mammals, improve predictive accuracy by 15-25% over abiotic-only versions, underscoring biotic roles in historical range contractions during Pleistocene glaciations. This causal hierarchy aligns with first-principles limits: abiotic filters set fundamental niches, biotic forces sculpt realized ones through density-dependent feedbacks.

Theoretical Frameworks

Biogeographic Realms and Zones

Biogeographic realms constitute the highest level of spatial division in terrestrial biogeography, delineating vast areas where phylogenetic turnover in species assemblages exceeds that observed between continents, reflecting deep historical isolation driven by vicariance events like and limited inter-realm dispersal. These realms emerge from empirical patterns in distributions, particularly vertebrates and , where endemic lineages dominate due to prolonged evolutionary divergence; for instance, realms exhibit higher internally than across boundaries, as quantified by phylogenetic dissimilarity metrics. Criteria for demarcation include pronounced discontinuities in species composition, supported by cluster analyses of range data, rather than mere climatic gradients. Alfred Russel Wallace formalized the concept in 1876 through analysis of global faunal distributions, identifying six realms: Palearctic (encompassing Europe, North Asia, and North Africa), Nearctic ( north of Mexico), Neotropical (Central and ), Ethiopian (), Oriental (South and ), and Australian (). Wallace's boundaries, such as the separating Oriental and Australian realms, align with marine barriers that restricted gene flow, evidenced by abrupt faunal shifts in transitional zones like . This classification prioritized zoological data but has been corroborated by botanical patterns, with realms showing congruent floristic discontinuities. Modern refinements, informed by and comprehensive range mapping, adjust these divisions; a 2013 study using vertebrate phylogenies identified 11 realms by clustering 21,037 ' distributions via multivariate analysis, revealing unsupported traditional units like a unified Holarctic (merging Palearctic and Nearctic) and proposing splits such as Madagascan and Saharo-Arabian realms from Ethiopian. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) employs eight realms in its framework, distinguishing Oceanian (Pacific islands) and from Australian, to account for insular and polar isolation, facilitating conservation prioritization based on realm-specific hotspots. These updates underscore causal roles of geological history—e.g., Gondwanan fragmentation yielding Australasian endemics like marsupials—over abiotic proxies alone. Biogeographic zones, or provinces, represent nested subdivisions within s, defined by finer-scale phylogenetic breaks and transitional faunas, often spanning 10^5 to 10^6 km²; examples include the Sino-Japanese zone in Palearctic or the Chacoan in Neotropical, where sub-realm rates reach 20-50% higher than realm averages due to orographic or riverine barriers. Quantitative delineation employs similarity indices like Sørensen's, applied to co-occurrence matrices, revealing 20-60 provinces globally depending on taxonomic resolution. Such zoning aids in modeling dispersal gradients and predicting responses to barriers like the , which fused Nearctic and Neotropical biotas post-3 million years ago.
Realm (Wallacean)Modern Equivalent (e.g., WWF/Holt)Key Endemic Taxa ExamplePrimary Isolating Barrier
PalearcticPalearcticHolarctic mammals diverge south of Himalayan uplift
NearcticNearcticPleistocene refugia Bering cycles
NeotropicalNeotropicalAmazonian
EthiopianAfrotropical (split)Afrotherian mammalsSahara Desert
OrientalIndomalayanSundaland tigers seas
AustralianAustralasian/OceanianMonotremes, ratitesDeep ocean trenches
This table summarizes core realms, highlighting empirical anchors in endemicity and barriers verifiable via fossil and genomic records.

Island Biogeography

Island biogeography focuses on the ecological and evolutionary processes shaping species distributions on islands, which serve as natural experiments due to their isolation. The equilibrium theory, developed by Robert H. MacArthur and Edward O. Wilson in their 1967 monograph The Theory of Island Biogeography, asserts that species richness on islands stabilizes at a point where immigration rates balance extinction rates. Immigration decreases as distance from mainland source pools increases, because fewer propagules arrive and establishment probability falls; extinction rises on smaller islands owing to finite habitat supporting smaller populations prone to stochastic loss. This dynamic yields predictions of higher diversity on larger, nearer islands, formalized in rate curves where equilibrium species number SS satisfies I(S)=E(S)I(S) = E(S), with II declining and EE rising as SS grows. Empirical support derives from species-area relationships across oceanic archipelagos, where log scales linearly with log area, typically with exponent zz values of 0.20–0.35 for birds, , and —steeper than continental fragments (z≈0.12–0.17z \approx 0.12–0.17), reflecting stronger isolation effects. For instance, analyses of birds and Florida Keys herpetofauna confirm distance-decay in similarity and area effects on richness, with turnover evident in long-term monitoring of islands showing 20–50% species replacement over decades. studies, like those on in Japanese mountains, extend patterns to terrestrial isolates, linking to analogous area-isolation metrics. Post-1967 refinements address limitations, such as the original model's neglect of ; remote islands like exhibit elevated via , prompting unified models incorporating speciation-immigration-extinction equilibria, where older or larger isolates foster higher diversification. Niche-based extensions emphasize climatic heterogeneity driving functional diversity, with island niche capacity predicting plant and vertebrate richness better in some datasets than area alone. Human impacts, including and fragmentation, alter dynamics—exotics follow modified invasion curves, saturating faster on proximate islands. Conservation applications treat fragments as "islands" in anthropogenic matrices, advocating larger reserves to minimize and corridors to boost rescue effects, though single-large-or-several-small (SLOSS) debates highlight context-dependency, with meta-analyses favoring connectivity over strict size for persistence. Empirical tests in fragmented forests validate relaxation toward lower equilibria post-isolation, underscoring urgency in preserving area and proximity.

Phylogeographic Patterns

Phylogeography integrates genetic data with geographic distributions to infer historical , such as expansions, contractions, and isolations, revealing patterns shaped by barriers, shifts, and dispersal events. These patterns often emerge from comparative analyses across taxa, highlighting congruent signals of shared historical processes like Pleistocene glaciations, which drove lineage divergence through vicariance and subsequent recolonization. For instance, empirical studies using and coalescent models demonstrate how genetic lineages cluster into discrete phylogroups, reflecting refugia—geographically isolated areas where populations persisted during unfavorable conditions. A prevalent pattern is isolation by distance, where genetic similarity declines with increasing geographic separation, often modulated by landscape features like rivers or mountains that impede . In North American warm deserts, community-level breaks align with topographic barriers, filtering taxa and structuring genetic diversity across lineages. Suture zones, regions of secondary contact between diverged lineages post-isolation, exhibit elevated breaks and hybridization, as seen in tropical rainforests where cryptic lineages meet with mtDNA divergences of 2–15%. Genetic clines, gradual transitions in frequencies, further delineate these zones, providing evidence for ongoing admixture rather than complete barriers. Refugial patterns dominate in temperate zones, with post-glacial expansions from southern refugia producing star-like networks indicative of rapid demographic growth. In and , tree species like oaks and pines show nested clade analyses supporting survival in multiple refugia during the around 20,000 years ago, followed by northward migrations tracking warming climates. Comparative across vertebrates reinforces this, revealing concordant breaks (e.g., in the Mediterranean and Appalachians) that align with paleogeographic events predating the Pleistocene, such as tectonic uplifts. These patterns underscore causal links between abiotic drivers—like of ice ages—and biotic responses, challenging purely ecological explanations for current distributions. In integrative historical biogeography, phylogeographic signals refine vicariance models by dating divergence via molecular clocks; for example, Lower Central American biota exhibit patterns tied to land-bridge formations around 3–5 million years ago. Discrepancies arise when idiosyncratic dispersal overrides congruence, as in where introduced-range phylogeography masks native signals, necessitating caution in interpreting genomic data without geographic context. Overall, these patterns affirm 's role in testing biogeographic hypotheses, prioritizing empirical genetic evidence over speculative narratives.

Subfields

Ecological Biogeography

Ecological biogeography examines the contemporary distributions of and as products of ecological processes, including abiotic tolerances and biotic interactions, operating over short timescales from years to centuries. It contrasts with historical biogeography by prioritizing current environmental conditions—such as , , and —over deep-time events like . This subfield analyzes how physiological limits, resource availability, and species interactions determine range boundaries and assembly. Abiotic factors form the foundation of species distributions by delineating the fundamental niche, the set of conditions permitting and reproduction absent biotic pressures. Temperature gradients, for instance, restrict many ; the grass Corynephorus canescens persists only where July mean temperatures stay below 15°C, while the flycatcher Sayornis phoebe requires winter isotherms above -4°C to avoid lethal cold. and soil pH similarly constrain ranges, as seen in global soil bacterial communities where pH emerges as the primary correlate of taxonomic composition. influences distributions through elevational gradients and habitat heterogeneity, amplifying diversity via microclimatic variation. Biotic interactions shape the realized niche by modulating access to the fundamental niche via competition, predation, herbivory, and mutualism. Competitive exclusion limits distributions, as in intertidal where Balanus balanoides outcompetes Chthamalus stellatus in lower zones, confining the latter to upper intertidal refuges. Predation and herbivory create predator-free zones or grazing lawns that expand or contract ranges, while mutualisms—such as ant protection for Lysandra bellargus caterpillars—enable persistence in otherwise hostile habitats. Niche partitioning, evident in where beak variations exploit distinct seed sizes, allows multiple species to coexist by subdividing resources. Dispersal mechanisms bridge suitable habitats, with efficacy varying by life history: wind disperses 7.5% of Hawaiian seed plants, sea currents 5%, and animals 37%. Source-sink dynamics arise when dispersal overcomes local extinction risks in suboptimal patches, sustaining metapopulations. Habitat fragmentation disrupts these processes, reducing colonization rates and elevating extinction probabilities; minimum viable populations for long-term persistence often exceed 1,377 individuals over 100 years. Ecological biogeography employs models integrating these elements to forecast shifts, such as range expansions of invasive plants amid warming, where ecological factors account for 21% of caddisfly distributions in Mediterranean rivers.

Historical and Paleobiogeography

![Wegener's fossil map illustrating continental connections][float-right] Historical biogeography examines the long-term evolutionary processes shaping species distributions, integrating biological with geological changes over millions of years. It reconstructs the origins and histories of taxa and geographic areas by accounting for past events such as continental movements and barriers. Unlike ecological biogeography, which focuses on contemporary short-term dynamics, historical approaches emphasize deep-time patterns driven by vicariance and dispersal. Paleobiogeography, a core component, utilizes fossil records to map ancient organism distributions and infer responses to tectonic and climatic shifts. It employs phylogenetic analyses of fossil taxa to identify congruence between evolutionary trees and area cladograms, revealing historical connections or isolations. Methods include quantitative assessments of faunal similarities across sites and modeling calibrated to paleoenvironments. Key evidence emerged from fossil distributions supporting continental drift, first proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1912. Matching fossils, such as the Permian seed fern Glossopteris across southern continents and the Carboniferous reptile Mesosaurus in South America and Africa, indicated former land connections in Gondwana. The acceptance of plate tectonics in the 1960s transformed the field, explaining vicariance events like the breakup of Pangaea around 200 million years ago, which fragmented ranges of shared ancestors. Examples include fossil marsupials found in Antarctica, linking it to South America and Australia before their separation approximately 35 million years ago. Ordovician trilobites, corals, and graptolites further delineate ancient plate boundaries through biogeographic congruence. These patterns underscore how tectonic vicariance, rather than long-distance dispersal alone, drove major clade radiations and endemism.

Conservation Biogeography

Conservation biogeography applies principles from biogeography—such as species dispersal, historical distributions, and environmental gradients—to inform strategies for mitigating and managing ecosystems under threat. This subdiscipline emerged prominently in the mid-2000s, building on foundational theories like island biogeography to address contemporary pressures including , climate alteration, and species invasions. By analyzing spatial patterns of and diversity, it identifies priority areas for protection and evaluates risks from landscape changes, emphasizing empirical data over assumption-driven planning. A central application involves , where biogeographic analyses reveal how patch isolation and exacerbate extinction probabilities beyond simple area loss. For instance, meta-analyses indicate that fragmentation geometry influences dynamics, with isolated remnants showing elevated local due to reduced and increased events. In mammalian assemblages, fragmentation accounts for approximately 9% of additional range loss committed to , amplifying threats in landscapes where patches are small and disconnected. These findings underscore the need for connectivity corridors informed by dispersal to sustain viable populations. In response to , conservation biogeography employs distribution modeling to forecast range contractions or expansions, integrating paleobiogeographic data to pinpoint refugia where have historically persisted through climatic shifts. Studies project that dynamic environmental gradients will drive non-analogous assemblages, necessitating adaptive reserve designs that prioritize elevational and latitudinal gradients over static hotspots. from terrestrial systems highlights how ignoring biogeographic barriers in planning can lead to maladaptive outcomes, such as overlooking dispersal limitations that trap in unsuitable habitats. The field also addresses biotic homogenization from , using biogeographic barriers' erosion—facilitated by global trade—to predict invasion hotspots and inform . Analyses show that human-mediated dispersal overrides natural filters, increasing risks for endemics in isolated realms, as seen in systems where non-native introductions correlate with native declines. Prioritizing regions with high phylogenetic uniqueness, conservation biogeography advocates for targeted interventions grounded in verifiable dispersal pathways rather than generalized prohibitions.

Patterns and Units

Global Distribution Realms

Biogeographic realms represent the broadest spatial divisions of Earth's terrestrial biota, defined by distinct assemblages of reflecting shared evolutionary histories and long-term isolation by physical barriers such as oceans, mountain ranges, and deserts. These realms emerged from analyses of faunal and floral distributions, with first delineating six primary zoogeographic regions in his 1876 work The Geographical Distribution of Animals, based on observations of turnover and during his expeditions in and elsewhere. Modern classifications, such as the 2001 framework by Olson et al., expand to eight realms—Nearctic, Palearctic, Neotropical, Afrotropical, Indomalayan, Australasian, Oceanian, and —incorporating oceanic islands and polar regions while maintaining Wallace's core divisions. These realms exhibit sharp biogeographic boundaries, exemplified by the separating the Indomalayan and Australasian realms across the Indonesian islands, where placental mammals dominate east of the line but marsupials prevail west, a Wallace attributed to historical sea barriers limiting dispersal. Phylogenetic studies confirm these divisions, showing realm-specific clades with divergence times aligning to tectonic events like the breakup of , which isolated southern continents and fostered unique radiations such as marsupials in . Characteristic biotas underscore realm distinctiveness: the Nearctic and Palearctic realms share Holarctic affinities with temperate mammals like bears and deer but differ in endemics, such as North America's ; the features high mammalian , including and giraffes, with and gradients; the hosts unparalleled diversity, with over 3,000 fish in the Amazon alone, reflecting Andean uplift and isolation. Fossil evidence supports these patterns, as records show shared Gondwanan taxa like ancient marsupials linking , , and Australasian realms before enforced vicariance around 100-80 million years ago. peaks at realm boundaries, with turnover rates exceeding 50% across lines like the Saharo-Arabian desert barrier between Palearctic and s, validated by estimates of origins. Refinements continue, with some analyses proposing up to 11-20 realms based on finer genomic data and island endemism, yet Wallace's foundational scheme persists due to its alignment with macroevolutionary processes over superficial distributions. These realms inform conservation by highlighting hotspots of endemism, such as the Australasian realm's 80% unique bird , vulnerable to dispersal barriers disrupted by human activity.

Endemism and Diversity Metrics

Endemism denotes the condition in which a occurs exclusively within a defined geographic area, reflecting historical isolation, events, or ecological specialization. In biogeography, serves as a key indicator of evolutionary and regional uniqueness, with areas of often delineating boundaries between biogeographic realms. Metrics quantifying include endemic , which counts range-restricted taxa per unit area, and weighted , which emphasizes narrow-ranged species relative to total . Phylogenetic endemism extends these measures by incorporating evolutionary history, calculating the concentration of unique phylogenetic branches within a to prioritize areas with irreplaceable lineages. Global patterns reveal elevated on islands, where standardized endemic richness for reaches 172.3 range equivalents per 10,000 km², approximately 9.5 times higher than mainland values of 18.2. This disparity arises from vicariance and dispersal limitations, amplifying in isolated habitats. Diversity metrics in biogeography intersect with through assessments of and evenness among endemic assemblages, often revealing hotspots where high endemism coincides with elevated total diversity. For instance, among nonmarine mammals, endemism hotspots align with regions of peak , such as tropical mountains and islands, though rarity can sometimes inversely correlate with abundance. Conservation frameworks leverage these metrics, defining 36 terrestrial hotspots based on thresholds exceeding 1,500 endemic vascular and habitat loss over 70%, encompassing 22% of Earth's phylogenetic endemism but facing substantial human impacts. Empirical data underscore scale-dependent patterns, with topographic heterogeneity and climatic stability driving endemism hotspots in regions like the and , where endemic richness for vertebrates and plants correlates strongly. Freshwater taxa exhibit analogous trends, with global endemism concentrated in drainage basins of high topographic relief, informing predictive models of vulnerability to perturbations.

Beta and Gamma Diversity

Beta diversity quantifies the variation in species composition across multiple local communities or habitats within a defined region, capturing the turnover or replacement of species along environmental gradients, dispersal barriers, or biogeographic transitions. It partitions regional diversity by measuring how much local (alpha) assemblages differ, often expressed as the ratio β = γ / α, where γ is regional ; this highlights processes like habitat heterogeneity and historical isolation driving compositional dissimilarity. In biogeography, reveals patterns such as elevated turnover in fragmented landscapes, where physical barriers like oceans or mountains limit species exchange, as evidenced by steeper species replacement rates across island chains compared to continental gradients. Gamma diversity represents the total species pool across an entire biogeographic region or landscape, integrating within sites and among them to reflect the cumulative outcome of evolutionary divergence, colonization, and extinction over broad scales. It scales up local richness to assess macroevolutionary assembly, with higher values typically in expansive realms featuring diverse habitats, such as tropical forests encompassing thousands of species per . Biogeographic analyses use to delineate realms, where it correlates with historical vicariance events; for instance, the Indo-Australian transition zone exhibits gamma peaks due to faunal blending from adjacent realms. Metrics for beta diversity include distance-based indices like the Sørensen dissimilarity (1 - 2C / (S1 + S2), where C is shared and S1, S2 are site totals), which decomposes into turnover (replacement) and nestedness ( loss) components to distinguish replacement from richness differences. Additive partitions (γ = α + β) provide absolute measures suited to hierarchical scales in biogeography, revealing how beta accumulates across nested regions like ecoregions within biomes. is typically estimated via accumulation curves or , accounting for sampling effort in large-scale inventories. Empirical studies demonstrate that beta diversity often declines with and , as regional gamma decreases faster than local alpha, resulting in more homogeneous high-latitude assemblages with reduced turnover; for example, bacterial beta diversity in soils shows habitat-specific peaks but converges in extreme environments. In freshwater systems, tropical ponds exhibit higher alpha and gamma than temperate counterparts, with beta amplifying regional totals through niche partitioning. These patterns underscore beta's role in diagnosing dispersal constraints and environmental filtering in biogeographic models. In conservation biogeography, prioritizing high-beta areas preserves compositional uniqueness, as beta hotspots signal irreplaceable evolutionary lineages; however, anthropogenic homogenization can erode beta faster than alpha or gamma, as seen in urban gradients where reduce turnover by 20-50% in some taxa. approaches now estimate these metrics from occurrence data, enhancing for unsampled regions while validating against field surveys.

Controversies and Debates

SLOSS Debate

The SLOSS debate, an acronym for "Single Large or Several Small," concerns the optimal configuration of protected reserves for conserving , specifically whether a single large reserve of a given total area preserves more than several smaller reserves of equivalent combined area. The debate originated in the 1970s from applications of MacArthur and Wilson's theory of island biogeography to terrestrial fragments, with Jared Diamond's 1975 analysis of bird communities on land-bridge islands arguing that larger, contiguous areas support higher and lower extinction rates due to greater habitat heterogeneity and population sizes within them. This position, formalized as the first principle of reserve design, posited that fragmentation into smaller patches increases , such as elevated predation, parasitism, and incursions, thereby reducing overall viability for interior-dependent or wide-ranging . Proponents of the single large approach emphasize empirical patterns from island biogeography, where species-area relationships (S = cA^z, with S as species number, A as area, and z typically 0.2-0.3) predict that one large patch outperforms fragmented equivalents by minimizing isolation and demographic stochasticity. For instance, studies of fragmented forests have shown that small patches exhibit rapid species turnover and local extinctions, particularly for vertebrates requiring extensive territories, with edge-to-interior ratios scaling unfavorably in smaller units. Conversely, advocates for several small reserves argue that replication across patches hedges against stochastic events like fires or diseases that could eradicate an entire population in a monolithic reserve, while potentially encompassing greater by sampling varied microhabitats or rare, endemic species confined to specific locales. Early critiques, including analyses of reserve networks, suggested that several small sites could maintain higher short-term richness if they capture complementary assemblages, though this advantage often diminishes over time due to isolation. Empirical evidence remains context-dependent, with meta-analyses indicating that single large reserves generally outperform several small ones for long-term persistence in homogeneous landscapes, as fragmentation consistently correlates with across taxa and scales. A 2022 review of habitat patch studies found increasing support for combined strategies—large cores connected by corridors—over strict SLOSS dichotomies, as dispersal limitations in small patches exacerbate Allee effects and . However, in heterogeneous or human-modified environments, several small reserves may preserve more functional diversity by avoiding uniform threats, though theoretical models grounded in dynamics favor larger units for with low dispersal abilities. The debate has influenced reserve design globally, such as in the fragmented habitats of the Amazon, where connectivity via corridors is now prioritized to mitigate SLOSS trade-offs.

Exotic Species Impacts

Exotic species, defined as non-native organisms introduced beyond their natural range primarily through activities, exert significant ecological pressures on biogeographical patterns by homogenizing biotas, eroding , and altering distributions. These impacts manifest through direct mechanisms like predation and , as well as indirect ones such as alteration and transmission, often leading to reduced native diversity and disrupted evolutionary legacies shaped by historical barriers like oceans or mountains. Empirical studies indicate that invasive alien contribute to approximately 20% of documented extinctions where a single driver is identifiable, with predation by exotics being particularly devastating on isolated systems like islands. In terrestrial and island ecosystems, invasive predators have driven 58% of contemporary extinctions among birds (87 ), mammals (45 ), and reptiles (10 ), fundamentally reshaping biogeographical assemblages by eliminating endemic taxa that evolved in isolation. For example, the (Boiga irregularis), introduced to around 1945 via military cargo, extirpated at least 10 native bird by the 1980s through predation, collapsing the island's unique avian and illustrating how exotics can override vicariance-driven patterns. Similarly, non-native are eroding traditional biogeographic boundaries by facilitating biotic homogenization, as their global spread reduces turnover in species composition across realms, with studies showing rapid convergence in ant assemblages between continents. In aquatic and marine environments, exotic species disrupt biogeographical gradients by outcompeting natives and altering trophic structures; for instance, invasive foundation species like the (Dreissena polymorpha) in North American since the 1980s have filtered , reducing food for native and shifting community dominance toward invasives, thereby diminishing regional . Plants and also contribute, with invasive plants affecting native networks—disrupting primary and secondary dispersal by birds, , and mammals—and leading to altered regeneration patterns that favor exotics over endemics. Field experiments in reveal that 43% of studies on invasive plants report significant negative effects on native response variables, such as abundance and fitness, outweighing positive ones by a factor of 1.5. While some introductions yield neutral or facilitative effects, such as exotic providing novel habitats in degraded systems, the predominant empirical outcome is , with invasives listed as a to 34% of IUCN-assessed , second only to . Controversies persist regarding causation versus , as native declines often precede invasions, but experimental removals consistently demonstrate recovery of natives, affirming causal roles in many cases. These dynamics challenge core biogeographical tenets like Wallace's realms, as exotics facilitate "swapping" of biotas and blur dispersal barriers, potentially accelerating global homogenization under anthropogenic pressures.

Vicariance vs. Dispersal Primacy

Vicariance describes the process by which a continuously distributed ancestral population is divided by the formation of a geographic barrier, resulting in isolated subpopulations that may diverge into distinct species through allopatric speciation. Dispersal, in contrast, entails the active or passive crossing of pre-existing barriers by individuals or propagules, enabling colonization of new areas and potential speciation following isolation. The primacy debate in historical biogeography centers on which mechanism better explains observed disjunct distributions: vicariance as a default driven by earth history events like continental rifting, or dispersal requiring stochastic long-distance events. Historically, 19th-century biogeographers such as and prioritized dispersal from discrete centers of origin, assuming fixed continents and invoking migration to account for patterns like trans-oceanic similarities. This dispersalist paradigm persisted into the mid-20th century despite Alfred Wegener's 1912 continental drift hypothesis, which linked fossil distributions—such as flora across southern continents—to past land connections. The acceptance of in the 1960s catalyzed a vicariance revolution, with Léon Croizat's panbiogeographic tracks (1958 onward) mapping generalized distribution lines, Lars Brundin's chironomid midge phylogenies (1966) aligning with Gondwanan breakup timelines (circa 100-80 million years ago), and cladistic approaches by Gareth Nelson and Donn Rosen (1981) emphasizing congruent area cladograms across taxa as evidence of shared vicariant histories. Proponents of vicariance primacy argue its explanatory power lies in parsimony: it posits fewer improbable events, as barriers arise within widespread biotas, yielding hierarchical patterns testable via phylogenetic congruence, such as birds or southern beech trees mirroring fragmentation. Dispersal explanations, they contend, multiply ad hoc assumptions of rare trans-barrier jumps, often contradicted by uniform barrier ages predating lineage divergences. Conversely, dispersalist draws from molecular phylogenies and fossil-calibrated clocks revealing post-vicariance colonizations, as in Malagasy vertebrates where arrived via after tectonic isolation (circa 50-60 million years ago), and oceanic archipelagos like , formed de novo 5-0.4 million years ago, necessitating dispersal for all endemics. Gene flow signatures in island lizards further indicate recurrent oceanic crossings, challenging vicariance's universality. Contemporary analyses reject strict primacy, integrating both via event-based models like Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis (; Ronquist 1997), which optimizes ancestral ranges under vicariance, dispersal, , and duplication costs, often favoring dispersal in probabilistic frameworks (e.g., 20-50% of events in Bayesian implementations). For instance, biota show dispersal dominance post-Miocene volcanism (circa 23 million years ago), while continental disjunctions like the Rand Flora retain vicariant signals from Oligocene aridification (circa 30 million years ago). Empirical tests, such as those on Neotropical lineages, reveal context-dependency: vicariance prevails in large-scale, pre-Pleistocene events, but dispersal—facilitated by wind, birds, or rafting—drives finer-scale and recent patterns, with molecular data (e.g., mtDNA divergence rates) quantifying rare but sufficient long-distance events at rates of 10^-5 to 10^-3 per generation for plants and . Thus, causal realism demands evaluating mechanisms against geological, phylogenetic, and ecological evidence rather than paradigmatic preference.

Applications and Prospects

Predictive Modeling

Predictive modeling in biogeography relies predominantly on species distribution models (SDMs), which correlate georeferenced species occurrence or abundance data with environmental predictors—such as temperature, precipitation, and land cover—to estimate habitat suitability and forecast range dynamics under altered conditions. These correlative models, rooted in ecological niche theory, have gained prominence since the early 2000s, evolving from rudimentary bioclimatic envelopes to advanced algorithms like maximum entropy (MaxEnt), first detailed in a 2006 publication for presence-only data analysis. SDMs facilitate projections of biogeographical patterns, including shifts in global distribution realms and hotspots of endemism, by simulating responses to drivers like climate variability and habitat fragmentation. Methodological diversity includes presence-absence techniques (e.g., generalized linear models), approaches (e.g., random forests), and ensemble frameworks that aggregate outputs from multiple models to mitigate individual biases and improve robustness. In applications, SDMs underpin risk assessments, as seen in predictions of non-native expansion via pathways like trade routes, and inform reserve design by mapping potential refugia. For projections, models hindcast historical distributions against paleodata to validate forward simulations, revealing that many taxa exhibit lagged responses due to dispersal limitations not captured in static frameworks. Limitations persist, including sensitivity to sampling biases, pseudo-absence selection, and beyond , which can inflate Type I errors in novel climates. Biotic interactions, such as predation or , and microhabitat factors are frequently omitted, compromising causal accuracy and leading to discrepancies between modeled and observed ranges—evident in cases where SDMs overestimate extents by ignoring . Transferability across space and time remains challenged by non-stationarity in species-environment relationships, with validation metrics like area under the curve (AUC) often critiqued for favoring overfit models over true predictive power. Recent advancements incorporate dynamic variables, for finer covariates, and hybrid mechanistic-correlative designs to enhance realism, though empirical testing against field underscores the need for cautious interpretation in policy contexts.

Climate Change Projections

Climate change projections in biogeography anticipate widespread alterations to distributions, driven primarily by shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns that exceed historical variability. models (SDMs), often integrated with global climate models from the (CMIP6), forecast poleward and upslope range expansions for many taxa, with average latitudinal shifts estimated at 1-17 km per decade under moderate warming scenarios (RCP4.5). However, empirical syntheses indicate that only about 47% of documented range shifts align with these predictions, moving toward higher latitudes, elevations, or marine depths, highlighting limitations in model assumptions about niche conservatism and dispersal capacity. In terrestrial systems, montane and island endemics face heightened risks of range contraction due to "climate velocity"—the rate at which species must migrate to track suitable conditions—often outpacing maximum dispersal rates by factors of 10-100 for and small mammals. Marine biogeographic realms, such as the , project homogenization through tropical range contractions and poleward invasions, with temperature as a sole predictor underestimating shifts by ignoring and deoxygenation. is expected to decline globally by 2040-2100, as phylogenetic distinctions between realms erode under shared warming pressures, potentially amplifying risks in temperate zones. Extinction projections vary by taxon and scenario but converge on elevated risks for narrow-range species; a 2024 meta-analysis estimates 7.6% of assessed species (95% CI: 6.6-8.7%) face from climate change alone under SSP2-4.5 pathways, rising to one-third under high-emissions futures (SSP5-8.5) when factoring exposure, sensitivity, and . Tropical realms, including Amazonia and the Coral Triangle, are disproportionately vulnerable, with projected losses of 10-20% in vertebrate endemism by 2100 due to compounded . These forecasts underscore causal links between anthropogenic and biogeographic restructuring, though uncertainties persist from unmodeled biotic interactions and potential evolutionary rescues.

Human Interventions and Management

Human activities have profoundly altered biogeographical patterns through , which reduces interior habitat area and increases , thereby promoting local and altering species distributions across realms. For instance, fragmentation isolates populations, decreasing connectivity and by limiting dispersal between patches, with studies showing that patch size inversely correlates with extinction rates in forest birds across 214 landscapes. Agricultural expansion and urbanization exacerbate this by converting continuous habitats into mosaics, as evidenced by global analyses indicating that human since the has reshaped bioregions, particularly in temperate zones where past cultivation left lasting imprints on current species assemblages. The introduction of non-native species via global trade and transport represents another major intervention, homogenizing floras and faunas by eroding endemism and gamma diversity within realms. Peer-reviewed syntheses confirm that invasive species, often facilitated by human vectors, selectively invade vulnerable communities, with a 2025 analysis revealing their role in profoundly reshaping life's geography, including shifts in community composition across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. Such invasions contribute to biodiversity loss, accounting for up to 40% of endangered species listings, by outcompeting natives and altering trophic structures. Management strategies in conservation biogeography leverage spatial patterns to mitigate these effects, prioritizing protected areas that encompass high-endemism hotspots and biogeographical transitions to preserve . Early detection and rapid response (EDRR) protocols target , proving more cost-effective than eradication, with guidelines emphasizing prevention through measures like in ecosystems where is acute. Habitat corridors and restoration projects counteract fragmentation by enhancing connectivity, as modeled in biogeographical frameworks that predict dispersal success based on realm-specific barriers. Recent approaches integrate modeling to forecast invasion risks and prioritize management, such as selective control of high-impact invasives in fragmented landscapes. These interventions, informed by empirical data on historical footprints, aim to restore vicariance-driven patterns disrupted by anthropogenic dispersal.

References

  1. https://researchguides.dartmouth.edu/physical_geography/biogeography
  2. http://www2.hawaii.edu/~khayes/Journal_Club/spring2007/Posadas_et_al_2006_J_Arid_Env.pdf
  3. https://evolution.berkeley.edu/the-history-of-evolutionary-thought/1800s/biogeography-wallace-and-wegener/
  4. https://ncse.ngo/biogeography-and-evolution-two-wallaces-legacies
  5. https://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/essays/2011Sci&TechLibraries.pdf
  6. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44185-023-00010-w
  7. http://rcastilho.pt/MBE/ewExternalFiles/Trewick_Plate_tectonics_2017.pdf.pdf
  8. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199874002/obo-9780199874002-0043.xml
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10287814/
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/biogeography
  11. https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-012-0421-2
  12. https://geog.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/60/GEO4300-5305-ENVIRONMENTAL-BIOGEOGRAPHY-2022-BINFORD.pdf
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272701275_Biogeography_in_the_early_twenty-first_century_A_science_with_increasing_significance_for_Earth%27s_changes_and_challenges
  14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-025-02724-5
  15. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-20958-2
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/biogeography
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3130434/
  18. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1415442111
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096098222100988X
  20. https://www.amnh.org/research/center-for-biodiversity-conservation/research-and-conservation/biodiversity-informatics/evolutionary-biogeography
  21. https://www.the-innovation.org/article/doi/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2024.100052
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4183284/
  23. https://iep.utm.edu/aristotle-biology/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2672651/
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258125435_Aristotle_and_Theophrastus_on_plant-animal_interactions
  26. https://www.attalus.org/pliny/hn8a.html
  27. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/pliny_elder-natural_history/1938/pb_LCL330.51.xml
  28. https://sites.usnh.edu/hoslac/voyages-of-discovery-encounters-1400-1700/
  29. https://evolution.berkeley.edu/the-history-of-evolutionary-thought/pre-1800/nested-hierarchies-the-order-of-nature-carolus-linnaeus/
  30. https://klickalab.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/lecture-2.pdf
  31. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/0012-9623-90.3.253
  32. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo6040531.html
  33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1858.tb02549.x
  34. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bes2.1465
  35. https://www.geo.arizona.edu/antevs/ecol438/lect02.html
  36. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/30514
  37. https://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/Ancillary/1876_GeographicalDistribution_S718.1/1876_GeographicalDistribution_S718.1.html
  38. https://klickalab.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/lecture-3-1-april-2016.pdf
  39. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.002501
  40. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Willi-Hennig
  41. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12517
  42. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691088365/the-theory-of-island-biogeography
  43. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/download/47806.pdf
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105579030900373X
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790311000480
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19755165/
  47. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00143.x
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.12125
  49. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jse.12550
  50. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06644-x
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3972886/
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/biological-dispersal
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279421143_Dispersal_Biogeography
  54. https://fiveable.me/world-biogeography/unit-4
  55. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12690
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227689179_Dispersal_is_fundamental_to_biogeography_and_the_evolution_of_biodiversity_on_oceanic_islands
  57. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2022.0489
  58. https://fiveable.me/world-biogeography/unit-4/barriers-dispersal/study-guide/3ZKPA15W6a1JtpSU
  59. https://www.geo.arizona.edu/antevs/ecol438/lect08.html
  60. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.1280
  61. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.846975/full
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-46757-z
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10482685/
  64. https://evolution.berkeley.edu/glossary/vicariance/
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336042495_Vicariance_Biogeography
  66. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199941728/obo-9780199941728-0160.xml
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4810815/
  68. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-03107-y
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5617136/
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/vicariance
  71. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70238954
  72. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/707322
  73. https://bio.libretexts.org/Courses/Evergreen_Valley_College/Introduction_to_Ecology_%28Kappus%29/03%253A_Terrestrial_and_Aquatic_Biomes/3.01%253A_Biogeography_and_Species_Distributions
  74. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep44152
  75. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13825
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112722002432
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10027549/
  78. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00442-020-04714-9
  79. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14431
  80. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/icwdmother/article/1079/viewcontent/Lewis_SR_2017_Biotic_and_abiotic.pdf
  81. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.06.936625v1.full-text
  82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23258408/
  83. https://resources.unep-wcmc.org/products/f196d94a226d430fa214947d51dad35a
  84. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aam8326
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/island-biogeography
  86. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/63/1/55/1688748
  87. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2656.13029
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6468070/
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11199848/
  90. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/682934
  91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17832147/
  92. https://academic.oup.com/book/46637/chapter/410085975
  93. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119882381.ch3
  94. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1601072113
  95. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/08-0257.1
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/phylogeography
  97. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jbi.14115
  98. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2008.1622
  99. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1601066113
  100. https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12983-021-00418-9
  101. https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/14/1/evab176/6339579
  102. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24495219/
  103. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.595711/full
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230218003_Comparative_phylogeography_as_an_integrative_approach_to_historical_biogeography
  105. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/gayana/v72n1/art12.pdf
  106. https://mariomairal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Biogeography-An-Ecological-and-Evolutionary-Approach-Cox-Moore-Ladle-9-Edition.pdf
  107. http://courses.botany.wisc.edu/botany_422/Lecture/pdf/EvolutionIntro1.pdf
  108. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/paleobiogeography
  109. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstreams/c028b5db-a35c-487a-be84-e68672f2e14e/download
  110. https://jhortal.com/pubs/2011-Varela_etal_Palaeo3.pdf
  111. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/continental-drift/
  112. https://evolution.berkeley.edu/lines-of-evidence/distribution-in-time-and-space/biogeography/
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5474080/
  114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0031018273900187
  115. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00660.x
  116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332221005273
  117. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28270-3
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6405897/
  119. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2201950120
  120. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2310074121
  121. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2110866120
  122. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44185-024-00059-1
  123. https://mappingignorance.org/2013/03/04/ever-since-wallace/
  124. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/51/11/933/227116
  125. https://www.britannica.com/science/biogeographic-region/Fauna
  126. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-eight-biogeographic-realms.html
  127. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2015.0225
  128. http://novataxa.blogspot.com/2013/01/2013-wallace-zoogeographic-region.html
  129. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15921-6
  130. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10314928
  131. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47951-6
  132. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0810306106
  133. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0609334103
  134. https://resources.unep-wcmc.org/products/124b9a66d1c642b5bc41d1ff703a0d21
  135. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe5582
  136. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2685248/
  137. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4579866/
  138. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Ecology/Biodiversity_%28Bynum%29/7%253A_Alpha_Beta_and_Gamma_Diversity
  139. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9062518/
  140. https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lno.12429
  141. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233872
  142. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.839407/full
  143. https://www.ecography.org/blog/beta-diversity-and-its-decrease-increasing-elevation
  144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1618866725004236
  145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179122000780
  146. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112714006951
  147. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/geography/chpt/single-large-or-several-small-sloss-debate
  148. https://people.bu.edu/nathan/ge307_07_examnotes3.pdf
  149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9290967/
  150. https://www.treehugger.com/overview-of-the-sloss-debate-1181943
  151. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20152842/
  152. https://conservationcorridor.org/digests/2025/03/resolving-a-50-year-debate-fragmentation-decreases-biodiversity-on-multiple-scales/
  153. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421000263
  154. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2556416/
  155. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1602480113
  156. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10937723/
  157. https://aquaticinvasions.arphahub.com/article/134814/
  158. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9865603/
  159. https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/112368/
  160. https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/2023-08/iucn-red-list-and-invasive-alien-species.pdf
  161. https://sciences.ucf.edu/biology/d4lab/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2017/03/InvasionReadings.pdf
  162. https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/124500/
  163. https://yoderlab.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2006YoderNowakARES.pdf
  164. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534704003362
  165. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790319302519
  166. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030438000500267X
  167. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.14617
  168. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1486
  169. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.14559
  170. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338442/
  171. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.06852
  172. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534718301812
  173. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6238127/
  174. https://diaorssilab.web.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Wang_The-role-of-remote-sensing-in-species-distribution-models-a-review.pdf
  175. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.26.513922v1.full-text
  176. https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-023-00296-0
  177. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07560
  178. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11531475/
  179. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/63500/noaa_63500_DS1.pdf
  180. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adp4461
  181. https://today.uconn.edu/experts/expert-spotlight/10331/new-study-shows-alarming-rate-of-potential-species-extinction-due-to-climate-change/
  182. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
  183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4643828/
  184. https://web.pdx.edu/~rueterj/courses/esr220-201001/HabitatFragment2.pdf
  185. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.06762
  186. https://www.oeb.harvard.edu/news/global-database-plants-reveals-human-activity-biggest-driver-homogenization-plant
  187. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.05.663167
  188. https://defenders.org/blog/2023/08/how-do-invasive-species-affect-biodiversity-and-how-can-they-be-controlled
  189. https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/subject/control-mechanisms
  190. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10104574/
  191. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064420300250
  192. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08752-2
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.