Hubbry Logo
MethaneMethaneMain
Open search
Methane
Community hub
Methane
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Methane
Methane
from Wikipedia

Methane
Stereo, skeletal formula of methane with some measurements added
Stereo, skeletal formula of methane with some measurements added
Ball and stick model of methane
Ball and stick model of methane
Spacefill model of methane
Spacefill model of methane
  Carbon, C
  Hydrogen, H
Names
Preferred IUPAC name
Methane[1]
Systematic IUPAC name
Carbane (never recommended[1])
Other names
  • Carbon tetrahydride
  • Carburetted hydrogen
  • Hydrogen carbide
  • Marsh gas
  • Methyl hydride
  • Natural gas
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
1718732
ChEBI
ChEMBL
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.000.739 Edit this at Wikidata
EC Number
  • 200-812-7
59
KEGG
MeSH Methane
RTECS number
  • PA1490000
UNII
UN number 1971
  • InChI=1S/CH4/h1H4 checkY
    Key: VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N checkY
  • C
Properties
CH4
Molar mass 16.043 g·mol−1
Appearance Colorless gas
Odor Odorless
Density
  • 0.657 kg/m3 (gas, 25 °C, 1 atm)
  • 0.717 kg/m3 (gas, 0 °C, 1 atm)[2]
  • 422.8 g/L (liquid, −162 °C)[3]
Melting point −182.456 °C (−296.421 °F; 90.694 K)[3]
Boiling point −161.49 °C (−258.68 °F; 111.66 K)[6]
Critical point (T, P) 190.56 K (−82.59 °C; −116.66 °F), 4.5992 MPa (45.391 atm)
22.7 mg/L[4]
Solubility Soluble in ethanol, diethyl ether, benzene, toluene, methanol, acetone and insoluble in water
log P 1.09
14 nmol/(Pa·kg)
Conjugate acid Methanium
Conjugate base Methyl anion
−17.4×10−6 cm3/mol[5]
Structure
Td
Tetrahedral at carbon atom
0 D
Thermochemistry[7]
35.7 J/(K·mol)
186.3 J/(K·mol)
−74.6 kJ/mol
−50.5 kJ/mol
−891 kJ/mol
Hazards[8]
GHS labelling:
GHS02: Flammable
Danger
H220
P210
NFPA 704 (fire diamond)
Flash point −188 °C (−306.4 °F; 85.1 K)
537 °C (999 °F; 810 K)
Explosive limits 4.4–17%
Related compounds
Related alkanes
Related compounds
Supplementary data page
Methane (data page)
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
☒N verify (what is checkY☒N ?)

Methane (US: /ˈmɛθn/ METH-ayn, UK: /ˈmθn/ MEE-thayn) is a chemical compound with the chemical formula CH4 (one carbon atom bonded to four hydrogen atoms). It is a group-14 hydride, the simplest alkane, and the main constituent of natural gas. The abundance of methane on Earth makes it an economically attractive fuel, although capturing and storing it is difficult because it is a gas at standard temperature and pressure. In the Earth's atmosphere methane is transparent to visible light but absorbs infrared radiation, acting as a greenhouse gas. Methane is an organic compound, and among the simplest of organic compounds. Methane is also a hydrocarbon.

Naturally occurring methane is found both below ground and under the seafloor and is formed by both geological and biological processes. The largest reservoir of methane is under the seafloor in the form of methane clathrates. When methane reaches the surface and the atmosphere, it is known as atmospheric methane.[10]

The Earth's atmospheric methane concentration has increased by about 160% since 1750, with the overwhelming percentage caused by human activity.[11] It accounted for 20% of the total radiative forcing from all of the long-lived and globally mixed greenhouse gases, according to the 2021 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.[12] Strong, rapid and sustained reductions in methane emissions could limit near-term warming and improve air quality by reducing global surface ozone.[13]

Methane has also been detected on other planets, including Mars, which has implications for astrobiology research.[14]

Properties and bonding

[edit]
Covalently bonded hydrogen and carbon in a molecule of methane.

Methane is a tetrahedral molecule with four equivalent C–H bonds. Its electronic structure is described by four bonding molecular orbitals (MOs) resulting from the overlap of the valence orbitals on C and H. The lowest-energy MO is the result of the overlap of the 2s orbital on carbon with the in-phase combination of the 1s orbitals on the four hydrogen atoms. Above this energy level is a triply degenerate set of MOs that involve overlap of the 2p orbitals on carbon with various linear combinations of the 1s orbitals on hydrogen. The resulting "three-over-one" bonding scheme is consistent with photoelectron spectroscopic measurements.

Methane is an odorless, colourless and transparent gas at standard temperature and pressure.[15] It does absorb visible light, especially at the red end of the spectrum, due to overtone bands, but the effect is only noticeable if the light path is very long. This is what gives Uranus and Neptune their blue or bluish-green colors, as light passes through their atmospheres containing methane and is then scattered back out.[16]

The familiar smell of natural gas as used in homes is achieved by the addition of an odorant, usually blends containing tert-butylthiol, as a safety measure. Methane has a boiling point of −161.5 °C at a pressure of one atmosphere.[3] As a gas, it is flammable over a range of concentrations (5.4%–17%) in air at standard pressure.

Solid methane exists in several modifications, of which nine are known.[17] Cooling methane at normal pressure results in the formation of methane I. This substance crystallizes in the cubic system (space group Fm3m). The positions of the hydrogen atoms are not fixed in methane I, i.e. methane molecules may rotate freely. Therefore, it is a plastic crystal.[18]

Chemical reactions

[edit]

The primary chemical reactions of methane are combustion, steam reforming to syngas, and halogenation. In general, methane reactions are difficult to control.

Selective oxidation

[edit]

Partial oxidation of methane to methanol (CH3OH), a more convenient, liquid fuel, is challenging because the reaction typically progresses all the way to carbon dioxide and water even with an insufficient supply of oxygen. The enzyme methane monooxygenase produces methanol from methane, but cannot be used for industrial-scale reactions.[19] Some homogeneously catalyzed systems and heterogeneous systems have been developed, but all have significant drawbacks. These generally operate by generating protected products which are shielded from overoxidation. Examples include the Catalytica system, copper zeolites, and iron zeolites stabilizing the alpha-oxygen active site.[20]

One group of bacteria catalyze methane oxidation with nitrite as the oxidant in the absence of oxygen, giving rise to the so-called anaerobic oxidation of methane.[21]

Acid–base reactions

[edit]

Like other hydrocarbons, methane is an extremely weak acid. Its pKa in DMSO is estimated to be 56.[22] It cannot be deprotonated in solution, but the conjugate base is known in forms such as methyllithium.

A variety of positive ions derived from methane have been observed, mostly as unstable species in low-pressure gas mixtures. These include methenium or methyl cation CH+3, methane cation CH+4, and methanium or protonated methane CH+5. Some of these have been detected in outer space. Methanium can also be produced as diluted solutions from methane with superacids. Cations with higher charge, such as CH2+6 and CH3+7, have been studied theoretically and conjectured to be stable.[23]

Despite the strength of its C–H bonds, there is intense interest in catalysts that facilitate C–H bond activation in methane (and other lower numbered alkanes).[24]

Combustion

[edit]
A young woman holding a flame in her hands
Methane bubbles can be burned on a wet hand without injury.

Methane's heat of combustion is 55.5 MJ/kg.[25] Combustion of methane is a multiple step reaction summarized as follows:

CH4 + 2 O2 → CO2 + 2 H2O
ΔH = −802 kJ/mol, at standard conditions (for water vapor, ΔH = −891 kJ/mol for liquid water)

Peters four-step chemistry is a systematically reduced four-step chemistry that explains the burning of methane.

Methane radical reactions

[edit]

Given appropriate conditions, methane reacts with halogen radicals as follows:

•X + CH4 → HX + •CH3
•CH3 + X2 → CH3X + •X

where X is a halogen: fluorine (F), chlorine (Cl), bromine (Br), or iodine (I). This mechanism for this process is called free radical halogenation. It is initiated when UV light or some other radical initiator (like peroxides) produces a halogen atom. A two-step chain reaction ensues in which the halogen atom abstracts a hydrogen atom from a methane molecule, resulting in the formation of a hydrogen halide molecule and a methyl radical (•CH3). The methyl radical then reacts with a molecule of the halogen to form a molecule of the halomethane, with a new halogen atom as byproduct.[26] Similar reactions can occur on the halogenated product, leading to replacement of additional hydrogen atoms by halogen atoms with dihalomethane, trihalomethane, and ultimately, tetrahalomethane structures, depending upon reaction conditions and the halogen-to-methane ratio.

This reaction is commonly used with chlorine to produce dichloromethane and chloroform via chloromethane. Carbon tetrachloride can be made with excess chlorine.

Uses

[edit]

Methane may be transported as a refrigerated liquid (liquefied natural gas, or LNG). While leaks from a refrigerated liquid container are initially heavier than air due to the increased density of the cold gas, the gas at ambient temperature is lighter than air. Gas pipelines distribute large amounts of natural gas, of which methane is the principal component.

Fuel

[edit]

Methane is used as a fuel for ovens, homes, water heaters, kilns, automobiles,[27][28] rockets, turbines, etc.

As the major constituent of natural gas, methane is important for electricity generation by burning it as a fuel in a gas turbine or steam generator. Compared to other hydrocarbon fuels, methane produces less carbon dioxide for each unit of heat released. At about 891 kJ/mol, methane's heat of combustion is lower than that of any other hydrocarbon, but the ratio of the heat of combustion (891 kJ/mol) to the molecular mass (16.0 g/mol, of which 12.0 g/mol is carbon) shows that methane, being the simplest hydrocarbon, produces more heat per mass unit (55.7 kJ/g) than other complex hydrocarbons. In many areas with a dense enough population, methane is piped into homes and businesses for heating, cooking, and industrial uses. In this context it is usually known as natural gas, which is considered to have an energy content of 39 megajoules per cubic meter, or 1,000 BTU per standard cubic foot. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is predominantly methane converted into liquid form for ease of storage or transport.

Rocket propellant

[edit]

Refined liquid methane as well as LNG is used as a rocket fuel,[29] when combined with liquid oxygen, as in the TQ-12, BE-4, Raptor, YF-215, and Aeon engines.[30] Due to the similarities between methane and LNG such engines are commonly grouped together under the term methalox.

As a liquid rocket propellant, a methane/liquid oxygen combination offers the advantage over kerosene/liquid oxygen combination, or kerolox, of producing small exhaust molecules, reducing coking or deposition of soot on engine components. Methane is easier to store than hydrogen due to its higher boiling point and density, as well as its lack of hydrogen embrittlement.[31][32] The lower molecular weight of the exhaust also increases the fraction of the heat energy which is in the form of kinetic energy available for propulsion, increasing the specific impulse of the rocket. Compared to liquid hydrogen, the specific energy of methane is lower but this disadvantage is offset by methane's greater density and temperature range, allowing for smaller and lighter tankage for a given fuel mass. Liquid methane has a temperature range (91–112 K) nearly compatible with liquid oxygen (54–90 K). The fuel currently sees use in operational launch vehicles such as Zhuque-2, Vulcan and New Glenn as well as in-development launchers such as Starship, Neutron, Terran R, Nova, and Long March 9.[33]

Chemical feedstock

[edit]

Natural gas, which is mostly composed of methane, is used to produce hydrogen gas on an industrial scale. Steam methane reforming (SMR), or simply known as steam reforming, is the standard industrial method of producing commercial bulk hydrogen gas. More than 50 million metric tons are produced annually worldwide (2013), principally from the SMR of natural gas.[34] Much of this hydrogen is used in petroleum refineries, in the production of chemicals and in food processing. Very large quantities of hydrogen are used in the industrial synthesis of ammonia.

At high temperatures (700–1100 °C) and in the presence of a metal-based catalyst (nickel), steam reacts with methane to yield a mixture of CO and H2, known as "water gas" or "syngas":

CH4 + H2O ⇌ CO + 3 H2

This reaction is strongly endothermic (consumes heat, ΔHr = 206 kJ/mol). Additional hydrogen is obtained by the reaction of CO with water via the water-gas shift reaction:

CO + H2O ⇌ CO2 + H2

This reaction is mildly exothermic (produces heat, ΔHr = −41 kJ/mol).

Methane is also subjected to free-radical chlorination in the production of chloromethanes, although methanol is a more typical precursor.[35]

Hydrogen can also be produced via the direct decomposition of methane, also known as methane pyrolysis, which, unlike steam reforming, produces no greenhouse gases (GHG). The heat needed for the reaction can also be GHG emission free, e.g. from concentrated sunlight, renewable electricity, or burning some of the produced hydrogen. If the methane is from biogas then the process can be a carbon sink. Temperatures in excess of 1200 °C are required to break the bonds of methane to produce hydrogen gas and solid carbon.[36] Through the use of a suitable catalyst the reaction temperature can be reduced to between 550 and 900 °C depending on the chosen catalyst. Dozens of catalysts have been tested, including unsupported and supported metal catalysts, carbonaceous and metal-carbon catalysts.[37]

The reaction is moderately endothermic as shown in the reaction equation below.[38]

CH4(g) → C(s) + 2 H2(g)
H° = 74.8 kJ/mol)

Refrigerant

[edit]

As a refrigerant, methane has the ASHRAE designation R-50.

Generation

[edit]
Global methane budget (2017). Shows natural sources and sinks (green), anthropogenic sources (orange), and mixed natural and anthropogenic sources (hatched orange-green for 'biomass and biofuel burning').

Methane can be generated through geological, biological or industrial routes.

Geological routes

[edit]
Abiotic sources of methane[example needed] have been found in more than 20 countries and in several deep ocean regions so far.

The two main routes for geological methane generation are (i) organic (thermally generated, or thermogenic) and (ii) inorganic (abiotic).[14] Thermogenic methane occurs due to the breakup of organic matter at elevated temperatures and pressures in deep sedimentary strata. Most methane in sedimentary basins is thermogenic; therefore, thermogenic methane is the most important source of natural gas. Thermogenic methane components are typically considered to be relic (from an earlier time). Generally, formation of thermogenic methane (at depth) can occur through organic matter breakup, or organic synthesis. Both ways can involve microorganisms (methanogenesis), but may also occur inorganically. The processes involved can also consume methane, with and without microorganisms.

The more important source of methane at depth (crystalline bedrock) is abiotic. Abiotic means that methane is created from inorganic compounds, without biological activity, either through magmatic processes[example needed] or via water-rock reactions that occur at low temperatures and pressures, like serpentinization.[39][40]

Biological routes

[edit]

Most of Earth's methane is biogenic and is produced by methanogenesis,[41][42] a form of anaerobic respiration only known to be conducted by some members of the domain Archaea.[43] Methanogens occur in landfills and soils,[44] ruminants (for example, cattle),[45] the guts of termites, and the anoxic sediments below the seafloor and the bottom of lakes.

This multistep process is used by these microorganisms for energy. The net reaction of methanogenesis is:

CO2 + 4 H2 → CH4 + 2 H2O

The final step in the process is catalyzed by the enzyme methyl coenzyme M reductase (MCR).[46]

Testing Australian sheep for exhaled methane production (2001), CSIRO
This image represents a ruminant, specifically a sheep, producing methane in the four stages of hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis.

Wetlands

[edit]

Wetlands are the largest natural sources of methane to the atmosphere,[47] accounting for approximately 20–30% of atmospheric methane.[48] Climate change is increasing the amount of methane released from wetlands due to increased temperatures and altered rainfall patterns. This phenomenon is called wetland methane feedback.[49]

Rice cultivation generates as much as 12% of total global methane emissions due to the long-term flooding of rice fields.[50]

Ruminants

[edit]

Ruminants such as cattle belch out methane, accounting for about 22% of the U.S. annual methane emissions to the atmosphere.[51] One study reported that the livestock sector in general (primarily cattle, chickens, and pigs) produces 37% of all human-induced methane.[52] A 2013 study estimated that livestock accounted for 44% of human-induced methane and about 15% of human-induced greenhouse gas emissions.[53] Many efforts are underway to reduce livestock methane production, such as medical treatments and dietary adjustments,[54][55] and to trap the gas to use its combustion energy.[56]

Seafloor sediments

[edit]

Most of the subseafloor is anoxic because oxygen is removed by aerobic microorganisms within the first few centimeters of the sediment. Below the oxygen-replete seafloor, methanogens produce methane that is either used by other organisms or becomes trapped in gas hydrates.[43] These other organisms that utilize methane for energy are known as methanotrophs ('methane-eating'), and are the main reason why little methane generated at depth reaches the sea surface.[43] Consortia of Archaea and Bacteria have been found to oxidize methane via anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM); the organisms responsible for this are anaerobic methanotrophic Archaea (ANME) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB).[57]

Industrial routes

[edit]
This diagram shows a method for producing methane sustainably. See: electrolysis, Sabatier reaction

Given its cheap abundance in natural gas, there is little incentive to produce methane industrially. Methane can be produced by hydrogenating carbon dioxide through the Sabatier process. Methane is also a side product of the hydrogenation of carbon monoxide in the Fischer–Tropsch process, which is practiced on a large scale to produce longer-chain molecules than methane.

An example of large-scale coal-to-methane gasification is the Great Plains Synfuels plant, started in 1984 in Beulah, North Dakota as a way to develop abundant local resources of low-grade lignite, a resource that is otherwise difficult to transport for its weight, ash content, low calorific value and propensity to spontaneous combustion during storage and transport. A number of similar plants exist around the world, although mostly these plants are targeted towards the production of long chain alkanes for use as gasoline, diesel, or feedstock to other processes.

Power to methane is a technology that uses electrical power to produce hydrogen from water by electrolysis and uses the Sabatier reaction to combine hydrogen with carbon dioxide to produce methane.

Laboratory synthesis

[edit]

Methane can be produced by protonation of methyl lithium or a methyl Grignard reagent such as methylmagnesium chloride. It can also be made from anhydrous sodium acetate and dry sodium hydroxide, mixed and heated above 300 °C (with sodium carbonate as byproduct).[citation needed] In practice, a requirement for pure methane can easily be fulfilled by steel gas bottle from standard gas suppliers.

Occurrence

[edit]

Methane is the major component of natural gas, about 87% by volume. The major source of methane is extraction from geological deposits known as natural gas fields, with coal seam gas extraction becoming a major source (see coal bed methane extraction, a method for extracting methane from a coal deposit, while enhanced coal bed methane recovery is a method of recovering methane from non-mineable coal seams). It is associated with other hydrocarbon fuels, and sometimes accompanied by helium and nitrogen. Methane is produced at shallow levels (low pressure) by anaerobic decay of organic matter and reworked methane from deep under the Earth's surface. In general, the sediments that generate natural gas are buried deeper and at higher temperatures than those that contain oil.

Methane is generally transported in bulk by pipeline in its natural gas form, or by LNG carriers in its liquefied form; few countries transport it by truck.

Atmospheric methane and climate change

[edit]

Methane (CH4) measured by the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) in the lower atmosphere (troposphere) at stations around the world. Abundances are given as pollution free monthly mean mole fractions in parts-per-billion.

Methane is an important greenhouse gas, responsible for around 30% of the rise in global temperatures since the industrial revolution.[58]

Methane has a global warming potential (GWP) of 29.8 ± 11 compared to CO2 (potential of 1) over a 100-year period, and 82.5 ± 25.8 over a 20-year period.[59] This means that, for example, a leak of one tonne of methane is equivalent to emitting 82.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide. Burning methane and producing carbon dioxide also reduces the greenhouse gas impact compared to simply venting methane to the atmosphere.

Sources of global methane emissions

As methane is gradually converted into carbon dioxide (and water) in the atmosphere, these values include the climate forcing from the carbon dioxide produced from methane over these timescales.

Annual global methane emissions are currently approximately 580 Mt,[60] 40% of which is from natural sources and the remaining 60% originating from human activity, known as anthropogenic emissions. The largest anthropogenic source is agriculture, responsible for around one quarter of emissions, closely followed by the energy sector, which includes emissions from coal, oil, natural gas and biofuels.[61]

Historic methane concentrations in the world's atmosphere have ranged between 300 and 400 nmol/mol during glacial periods commonly known as ice ages, and between 600 and 700 nmol/mol during the warm interglacial periods. A 2012 NASA website said the oceans were a potential important source of Arctic methane,[62] but more recent studies associate increasing methane levels as caused by human activity.[11]

Global monitoring of atmospheric methane concentrations began in the 1980s.[11] The Earth's atmospheric methane concentration has increased 160% since preindustrial levels in the mid-18th century.[11] In 2013, atmospheric methane accounted for 20% of the total radiative forcing from all of the long-lived and globally mixed greenhouse gases.[63] Between 2011 and 2019 the annual average increase of methane in the atmosphere was 1866 ppb.[12] From 2015 to 2019 sharp rises in levels of atmospheric methane were recorded.[64][65]

In 2019, the atmospheric methane concentration was higher than at any time in the last 800,000 years. As stated in the AR6 of the IPCC, "Since 1750, increases in CO2 (47%) and CH4 (156%) concentrations far exceed, and increases in N2O (23%) are similar to, the natural multi-millennial changes between glacial and interglacial periods over at least the past 800,000 years (very high confidence)".[12][a][66]

In February 2020, it was reported that fugitive emissions and gas venting from the fossil fuel industry may have been significantly underestimated.[67] [68] The largest annual increase occurred in 2021 with the overwhelming percentage caused by human activity.[11]

Climate change can increase atmospheric methane levels by increasing methane production in natural ecosystems, forming a climate change feedback.[43][69] Another explanation for the rise in methane emissions could be a slowdown of the chemical reaction that removes methane from the atmosphere.[70]

Over 100 countries have signed the Global Methane Pledge, launched in 2021, promising to cut their methane emissions by 30% by 2030.[71] This could avoid 0.2 °C of warming globally by 2050, although there have been calls for higher commitments in order to reach this target.[72] The International Energy Agency's 2022 report states "the most cost-effective opportunities for methane abatement are in the energy sector, especially in oil and gas operations".[73]

Clathrates

[edit]

Methane clathrates (also known as methane hydrates) are solid cages of water molecules that trap single molecules of methane. Significant reservoirs of methane clathrates have been found in arctic permafrost and along continental margins beneath the ocean floor within the gas clathrate stability zone, located at high pressures (1 to 100 MPa; lower end requires lower temperature) and low temperatures (< 15 °C; upper end requires higher pressure).[74] Methane clathrates can form from biogenic methane, thermogenic methane, or a mix of the two. These deposits are both a potential source of methane fuel as well as a potential contributor to global warming.[75][76] The global mass of carbon stored in gas clathrates is still uncertain and has been estimated as high as 12,500 Gt carbon and as low as 500 Gt carbon.[49] The estimate has declined over time with a most recent estimate of ≈1800 Gt carbon.[77] A large part of this uncertainty is due to our knowledge gap in sources and sinks of methane and the distribution of methane clathrates at the global scale. For example, a source of methane was discovered relatively recently in an ultraslow spreading ridge in the Arctic.[48] Some climate models suggest that today's methane emission regime from the ocean floor is potentially similar to that during the period of the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) around 55.5 million years ago, although there are no data indicating that methane from clathrate dissociation currently reaches the atmosphere.[77] Arctic methane release from permafrost and seafloor methane clathrates is a potential consequence and further cause of global warming; this is known as the clathrate gun hypothesis.[78][79][80][81] Data from 2016 indicate that Arctic permafrost thaws faster than predicted.[82]

Public safety and the environment

[edit]
An International Energy Agency graphic showing the potential of various emission reduction policies for addressing global methane emissions.

Methane "degrades air quality and adversely impacts human health, agricultural yields, and ecosystem productivity".[83]

The 2015–2016 methane gas leak in Aliso Canyon, California was considered to be the worst in terms of its environmental effect in American history.[84][85][86] It was also described as more damaging to the environment than Deepwater Horizon's leak in the Gulf of Mexico.[87]

In May 2023 The Guardian published a report blaming Turkmenistan as the worst in the world for methane super emitting. The data collected by Kayrros researchers indicate that two large Turkmen fossil fuel fields leaked 2.6 million and 1.8 million metric tonnes of methane in 2022 alone, pumping the CO2 equivalent of 366 million tonnes into the atmosphere, surpassing the annual CO2 emissions of the United Kingdom.[88]

Extraterrestrial methane

[edit]

Interstellar medium

[edit]

Methane is abundant in many parts of the Solar System and potentially could be harvested on the surface of another Solar System body (in particular, using methane production from local materials found on Mars[89] or Titan), providing fuel for a return journey.[29][90]

Negative methane, the negative ion of methane, is also known to exist in interstellar space.[91] Its mechanism of formation is not fully understood.

Mars

[edit]

Methane has been detected on all planets of the Solar System and most of the larger moons.[citation needed] With the possible exception of Mars, it is believed to have come from abiotic processes.[92][93]

Methane (CH4) on Mars – potential sources and sinks

The Curiosity rover has documented seasonal fluctuations of atmospheric methane levels on Mars. These fluctuations peaked at the end of the Martian summer at 0.6 parts per billion.[94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101]

Methane has been proposed as a possible rocket propellant on future Mars missions due in part to the possibility of synthesizing it on the planet by in situ resource utilization.[102] An adaptation of the Sabatier methanation reaction may be used with a mixed catalyst bed and a reverse water-gas shift in a single reactor to produce methane and oxygen from the raw materials available on Mars, utilizing water from the Martian subsoil and carbon dioxide in the Martian atmosphere.[89]

Methane could be produced by a non-biological process called serpentinization[b] involving water, carbon dioxide, and the mineral olivine, which is known to be common on Mars.[103]

Titan

[edit]
Titan lakes (September 11, 2017)

Methane has been detected in vast abundance on Titan, the largest moon of Saturn. It comprises a significant portion of its atmosphere and also exists in a liquid form on its surface, where it comprises the majority of the liquid in Titan's vast lakes of hydrocarbons, the second largest of which is believed to be almost pure methane in composition.[104]

The presence of stable lakes of liquid methane on Titan, as well as the surface of Titan being highly chemically active and rich in organic compounds, has led scientists to consider the possibility of life existing within Titan's lakes, using methane as a solvent in the place of water for Earth-based life[105] and using hydrogen in the atmosphere to derive energy with acetylene.[106]

History

[edit]
Alessandro Volta

The discovery of methane is credited to Italian physicist Alessandro Volta, who characterized numerous properties including its flammability limit and origin from decaying organic matter.[107]

Volta was initially motivated by reports of inflammable air present in marshes by his friend Father Carlo Giuseppe Campi. While on a fishing trip to Lake Maggiore straddling Italy and Switzerland in November 1776, he noticed the presence of bubbles in the nearby marshes and decided to investigate. Volta collected the gas rising from the marsh and demonstrated that the gas was inflammable.[107][108]

Volta notes similar observations of inflammable air were present previously in scientific literature, including a letter written by Benjamin Franklin.[109]

Following the Felling mine disaster of 1812 in which 92 men perished, Sir Humphry Davy established that the feared firedamp was in fact largely methane.[110]

The name "methane" was coined in 1866 by the German chemist August Wilhelm von Hofmann.[111][112] The name was derived from methanol.

Etymology

[edit]

Etymologically, the word methane is coined from the chemical suffix "-ane", which denotes substances belonging to the alkane family; and the word methyl, which is derived from the German Methyl (1840) or directly from the French méthyle, which is a back-formation from the French méthylène (corresponding to English "methylene"), the root of which was coined by Jean-Baptiste Dumas and Eugène Péligot in 1834 from the Greek μέθυ méthy (wine) (related to English "mead") and ὕλη hýlē (meaning "wood"). The radical is named after this because it was first detected in methanol, an alcohol first isolated by distillation of wood. The chemical suffix -ane is from the coordinating chemical suffix -ine which is from Latin feminine suffix -ina which is applied to represent abstracts. The coordination of "-ane", "-ene", "-one", etc. was proposed in 1866 by German chemist August Wilhelm von Hofmann.[113]

Abbreviations

[edit]

The abbreviation CH4-C can mean the mass of carbon contained in a mass of methane, and the mass of methane is always 1.33 times the mass of CH4-C.[114][115] CH4-C can also mean the methane-carbon ratio, which is 1.33 by mass.[116] Methane at scales of the atmosphere is commonly measured in teragrams (Tg CH4) or millions of metric tons (MMT CH4), which mean the same thing.[117] Other standard units are also used, such as nanomole (nmol, one billionth of a mole), mole (mol), kilogram, and gram.

Safety

[edit]

Methane is an asphyxiant gas, meaning that it is non-toxic and the primary health hazard is displacement of oxygen in high enough concentrations, potentially causing death by asphyxiation. No systemic toxicity has been detected at 5% concentration in air.

Methane is an extremely flammable gas at normal ambient temperature.[118] It may form explosive mixtures with air. Methane gas explosions are responsible for many deadly mining disasters.[119] A methane gas explosion was the cause of the Upper Big Branch coal mine disaster in West Virginia on April 5, 2010, killing 29.[120] Natural gas accidental release has also been a major focus in the field of safety engineering, due to past accidental releases that concluded in the formation of jet fire disasters.[121][122]

See also

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "General Principles, Rules, and Conventions". Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry. IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Blue Book). Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry. 2014. P-12.1. doi:10.1039/9781849733069-00001. ISBN 978-0-85404-182-4. Methane is a retained name (see P-12.3) that is preferred to the systematic name 'carbane', a name never recommended to replace methane, but used to derive the names 'carbene' and 'carbyne' for the radicals H2C2• and HC3•, respectively.
  2. ^ "Gas Encyclopedia". Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved November 7, 2013.
  3. ^ a b c Haynes, p. 3.344
  4. ^ Haynes, p. 5.156
  5. ^ Haynes, p. 3.578
  6. ^ CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 49th edition
  7. ^ Haynes, pp. 5.26, 5.67
  8. ^ "Safety Datasheet, Material Name: Methane" (PDF). US: Metheson Tri-Gas Incorporated. December 4, 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 4, 2012. Retrieved December 4, 2011.
  9. ^ NOAA Office of Response and Restoration, US GOV. "METHANE". noaa.gov. Archived from the original on January 9, 2019. Retrieved March 20, 2015.
  10. ^ Khalil, M. A. K. (1999). "Non-Co2 Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere". Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 24: 645–661. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.24.1.645.
  11. ^ a b c d e Global Methane Assessment (PDF). United Nations Environment Programme and Climate and Clean Air Coalition (Report). Nairobi. 2022. p. 12. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  12. ^ a b c "Climate Change 2021. The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers. Working Group I contribution to the WGI Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change". IPCC. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Archived from the original on August 22, 2021. Retrieved August 22, 2021.
  13. ^ IPCC, 2023: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, page 26, section C.2.3
  14. ^ a b Etiope, Giuseppe; Lollar, Barbara Sherwood (2013). "Abiotic Methane on Earth". Reviews of Geophysics. 51 (2): 276–299. Bibcode:2013RvGeo..51..276E. doi:10.1002/rog.20011. S2CID 56457317.
  15. ^ Hensher, David A.; Button, Kenneth J. (2003). Handbook of transport and the environment. Emerald Group Publishing. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-08-044103-0. Archived from the original on March 19, 2015. Retrieved February 22, 2016.
  16. ^ P.G.J Irwin; et al. (January 12, 2022). "Hazy Blue Worlds: A Holistic Aerosol Model for Uranus and Neptune, Including Dark Spots". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 127 (6) e2022JE007189. arXiv:2201.04516. Bibcode:2022JGRE..12707189I. doi:10.1029/2022JE007189. PMC 9286428. PMID 35865671. S2CID 245877540.
  17. ^ Bini, R.; Pratesi, G. (1997). "High-pressure infrared study of solid methane: Phase diagram up to 30 GPa". Physical Review B. 55 (22): 14800–14809. Bibcode:1997PhRvB..5514800B. doi:10.1103/physrevb.55.14800.
  18. ^ Wendelin Himmelheber. "Crystal structures". Archived from the original on February 12, 2020. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
  19. ^ Baik, Mu-Hyun; Newcomb, Martin; Friesner, Richard A.; Lippard, Stephen J. (2003). "Mechanistic Studies on the Hydroxylation of Methane by Methane Monooxygenase". Chemical Reviews. 103 (6): 2385–419. doi:10.1021/cr950244f. PMID 12797835.
  20. ^ Snyder, Benjamin E. R.; Bols, Max L.; Schoonheydt, Robert A.; Sels, Bert F.; Solomon, Edward I. (December 19, 2017). "Iron and Copper Active Sites in Zeolites and Their Correlation to Metalloenzymes". Chemical Reviews. 118 (5): 2718–2768. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00344. PMID 29256242.
  21. ^ Reimann, Joachim; Jetten, Mike S.M.; Keltjens, Jan T. (2015). "Metal Enzymes in "Impossible" Microorganisms Catalyzing the Anaerobic Oxidation of Ammonium and Methane". In Peter M.H. Kroneck and Martha E. Sosa Torres (ed.). Sustaining Life on Planet Earth: Metalloenzymes Mastering Dioxygen and Other Chewy Gases. Metal Ions in Life Sciences. Vol. 15. Springer. pp. 257–313. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12415-5_7. ISBN 978-3-319-12414-8. PMID 25707470.
  22. ^ Bordwell, Frederick G. (1988). "Equilibrium acidities in dimethyl sulfoxide solution". Accounts of Chemical Research. 21 (12): 456–463. doi:10.1021/ar00156a004. S2CID 26624076.
  23. ^ Rasul, G.; Surya Prakash, G.K.; Olah, G.A. (2011). "Comparative study of the hypercoordinate carbonium ions and their boron analogs: A challenge for spectroscopists". Chemical Physics Letters. 517 (1): 1–8. Bibcode:2011CPL...517....1R. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2011.10.020.
  24. ^ Bernskoetter, W. H.; Schauer, C. K.; Goldberg, K. I.; Brookhart, M. (2009). "Characterization of a Rhodium(I) σ-Methane Complex in Solution". Science. 326 (5952): 553–556. Bibcode:2009Sci...326..553B. doi:10.1126/science.1177485. PMID 19900892. S2CID 5597392.
  25. ^ Energy Content of some Combustibles (in MJ/kg) Archived January 9, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. People.hofstra.edu. Retrieved on March 30, 2014.
  26. ^ March, Jerry (1968). Advance Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms and Structure. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. pp. 533–534.
  27. ^ "Lumber Company Locates Kilns at Landfill to Use Methane – Energy Manager Today". Energy Manager Today. September 23, 2015. Archived from the original on July 9, 2019. Retrieved March 11, 2016.
  28. ^ Cornell, Clayton B. (April 29, 2008). "Natural Gas Cars: CNG Fuel Almost Free in Some Parts of the Country". Archived from the original on January 20, 2019. Retrieved July 25, 2009. Compressed natural gas is touted as the 'cleanest burning' alternative fuel available, since the simplicity of the methane molecule reduces tailpipe emissions of different pollutants by 35 to 97%. Not quite as dramatic is the reduction in net greenhouse-gas emissions, which is about the same as corn-grain ethanol at about a 20% reduction over gasoline
  29. ^ a b Thunnissen, Daniel P.; Guernsey, C. S.; Baker, R. S.; Miyake, R. N. (2004). "Advanced Space Storable Propellants for Outer Planet Exploration" (PDF). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (4–0799): 28. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 10, 2016.
  30. ^ "Blue Origin BE-4 Engine". Archived from the original on October 1, 2021. Retrieved June 14, 2019. We chose LNG because it is highly efficient, low cost and widely available. Unlike kerosene, LNG can be used to self-pressurize its tank. Known as autogenous repressurization, this eliminates the need for costly and complex systems that draw on Earth's scarce helium reserves. LNG also possesses clean combustion characteristics even at low throttle, simplifying engine reuse compared to kerosene fuels.
  31. ^ "SpaceX propulsion chief elevates crowd in Santa Barbara". Pacific Business Times. February 19, 2014. Retrieved February 22, 2014.
  32. ^ Belluscio, Alejandro G. (March 7, 2014). "SpaceX advances drive for Mars rocket via Raptor power". NASAspaceflight.com. Retrieved March 7, 2014.
  33. ^ "China beats rivals to successfully launch first methane-liquid rocket". Reuters. July 12, 2023.
  34. ^ Report of the Hydrogen Production Expert Panel: A Subcommittee of the Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technical Advisory Committee Archived February 14, 2020, at the Wayback Machine. United States Department of Energy (May 2013).
  35. ^ Rossberg, M. et al. (2006) "Chlorinated Hydrocarbons" in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. doi:10.1002/14356007.a06_233.pub2.
  36. ^ Lumbers, Brock (2022). "Mathematical modelling and simulation of the thermo-catalytic decomposition of methane for economically improved hydrogen production". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47 (7): 4265–4283. Bibcode:2022IJHE...47.4265L. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.057. S2CID 244814932. Retrieved June 15, 2022.
  37. ^ Hamdani, Iqra R.; Ahmad, Adeel; Chulliyil, Haleema M.; Srinivasakannan, Chandrasekar; Shoaibi, Ahmed A.; Hossain, Mohammad M. (August 15, 2023). "Thermocatalytic Decomposition of Methane: A Review on Carbon-Based Catalysts". ACS Omega. 8 (32): 28945–28967. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c01936. ISSN 2470-1343. PMC 10433352. PMID 37599913.
  38. ^ Lumbers, Brock (2022). "Low-emission hydrogen production via the thermo-catalytic decomposition of methane for the decarbonisation of iron ore mines in Western Australia". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47 (37): 16347–16361. Bibcode:2022IJHE...4716347L. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.124. S2CID 248018294. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
  39. ^ Kietäväinen and Purkamo (2015). "The origin, source, and cycling of methane in deep crystalline rock biosphere". Front. Microbiol. 6: 725. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00725. PMC 4505394. PMID 26236303.
  40. ^ Cramer and Franke (2005). "Indications for an active petroleum system in the Laptev Sea, NE Siberia". Journal of Petroleum Geology. 28 (4): 369–384. Bibcode:2005JPetG..28..369C. doi:10.1111/j.1747-5457.2005.tb00088.x. S2CID 129445357. Archived from the original on October 1, 2021. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
  41. ^ Lessner, Daniel J. (Dec 2009) Methanogenesis Biochemistry. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net Archived May 13, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  42. ^ Thiel, Volker (2018), "Methane Carbon Cycling in the Past: Insights from Hydrocarbon and Lipid Biomarkers", in Wilkes, Heinz (ed.), Hydrocarbons, Oils and Lipids: Diversity, Origin, Chemistry and Fate, Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–30, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54529-5_6-1, ISBN 978-3-319-54529-5, S2CID 105761461
  43. ^ a b c d Dean, Joshua F.; Middelburg, Jack J.; Röckmann, Thomas; Aerts, Rien; Blauw, Luke G.; Egger, Matthias; Jetten, Mike S. M.; de Jong, Anniek E. E.; Meisel, Ove H. (2018). "Methane Feedbacks to the Global Climate System in a Warmer World". Reviews of Geophysics. 56 (1): 207–250. Bibcode:2018RvGeo..56..207D. doi:10.1002/2017RG000559. hdl:1874/366386.
  44. ^ Serrano-Silva, N.; Sarria-Guzman, Y.; Dendooven, L.; Luna-Guido, M. (2014). "Methanogenesis and methanotrophy in soil: a review". Pedosphere. 24 (3): 291–307. Bibcode:2014Pedos..24..291S. doi:10.1016/s1002-0160(14)60016-3.
  45. ^ Sirohi, S. K.; Pandey, Neha; Singh, B.; Puniya, A. K. (September 1, 2010). "Rumen methanogens: a review". Indian Journal of Microbiology. 50 (3): 253–262. doi:10.1007/s12088-010-0061-6. PMC 3450062. PMID 23100838.
  46. ^ Lyu, Zhe; Shao, Nana; Akinyemi, Taiwo; Whitman, William B. (2018). "Methanogenesis". Current Biology. 28 (13): R727 – R732. Bibcode:2018CBio...28.R727L. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.021. PMID 29990451.
  47. ^ Tandon, Ayesha (March 20, 2023). "'Exceptional' surge in methane emissions from wetlands worries scientists". Carbon Brief. Retrieved September 18, 2023.
  48. ^ a b "New source of methane discovered in the Arctic Ocean". phys.org. May 1, 2015. Archived from the original on April 10, 2019. Retrieved April 10, 2019.
  49. ^ a b Boswell, Ray; Collett, Timothy S. (2011). "Current perspectives on gas hydrate resources". Energy Environ. Sci. 4 (4): 1206–1215. Bibcode:2011EnEnS...4.1206B. doi:10.1039/c0ee00203h.
  50. ^ Global Environment Facility (December 7, 2019). "We can grow more climate-friendly rice". Climate Home News. Retrieved September 18, 2023.
  51. ^ "Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014". 2016. Archived from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved April 11, 2019.[page needed]
  52. ^ FAO (2006). Livestock's Long Shadow–Environmental Issues and Options. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Archived from the original on July 26, 2008. Retrieved October 27, 2009.
  53. ^ Gerber, P.J.; Steinfeld, H.; Henderson, B.; Mottet, A.; Opio, C.; Dijkman, J.; Falcucci, A. & Tempio, G. (2013). "Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock". Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Archived from the original on July 19, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2016.
  54. ^ Roach, John (May 13, 2002). "New Zealand Tries to Cap Gaseous Sheep Burps". National Geographic. Archived from the original on June 4, 2011. Retrieved March 2, 2011.
  55. ^ Roque, Breanna M.; Venegas, Marielena; Kinley, Robert D.; Nys, Rocky de; Duarte, Toni L.; Yang, Xiang; Kebreab, Ermias (March 17, 2021). "Red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) supplementation reduces enteric methane by over 80 percent in beef steers". PLOS ONE. 16 (3) e0247820. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1647820R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247820. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 7968649. PMID 33730064.
  56. ^ Silverman, Jacob (July 16, 2007). "Do cows pollute as much as cars?". HowStuffWorks.com. Archived from the original on November 4, 2012. Retrieved November 7, 2012.
  57. ^ Knittel, K.; Wegener, G.; Boetius, A. (2019), McGenity, Terry J. (ed.), "Anaerobic Methane Oxidizers", Microbial Communities Utilizing Hydrocarbons and Lipids: Members, Metagenomics and Ecophysiology, Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–21, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60063-5_7-1, ISBN 978-3-319-60063-5
  58. ^ "Methane and climate change – Global Methane Tracker 2022 – Analysis". IEA. 2022. Retrieved September 18, 2023.
  59. ^ Forster, P.; Storelvmo, T.; Armour, K.; Collins, W.; Dufresne, J.-L.; Frame, D.; Lunt, D.J.; Mauritsen, T.; Palmer, M.D.; Watanabe, M.; Wild, M.; Zhang, H. (2021). "The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity". Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. pp. 923–1054.
  60. ^ "Global Methane Budget 2020". www.globalcarbonproject.org. Retrieved September 18, 2023.
  61. ^ "Methane and climate change – Global Methane Tracker 2022 – Analysis". IEA. Retrieved September 18, 2023.
  62. ^ "Study Finds Surprising Arctic Methane Emission Source". NASA. April 22, 2012. Archived from the original on August 4, 2014. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  63. ^ IPCC. "Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing". Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. 2013. pp. 659–740. doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.018. ISBN 978-1-107-05799-9.
  64. ^ Nisbet, E.G. (February 5, 2019). "Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 33 (3): 318–342. Bibcode:2019GBioC..33..318N. doi:10.1029/2018GB006009.
  65. ^ McKie, Robin (February 2, 2017). "Sharp rise in methane levels threatens world climate targets". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Archived from the original on July 30, 2019. Retrieved July 14, 2019.
  66. ^ IPCC (2013). Stocker, T. F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.-K.; Tignor, M.; et al. (eds.). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (PDF) (Report). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  67. ^ Hmiel, Benjamin; Petrenko, V. V.; Dyonisius, M. N.; Buizert, C.; Smith, A. M.; Place, P. F.; Harth, C.; Beaudette, R.; Hua, Q.; Yang, B.; Vimont, I.; Michel, S. E.; Severinghaus, J. P.; Etheridge, D.; Bromley, T.; Schmitt, J.; Faïn, X.; Weiss, R. F.; Dlugokencky, E. (February 2020). "Preindustrial 14CH4 indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions". Nature. 578 (7795): 409–412. Bibcode:2020Natur.578..409H. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 32076219. S2CID 211194542. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  68. ^ Harvey, Chelsea (February 21, 2020). "Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas May Be Significantly Underestimated; Estimates of methane coming from natural sources have been too high, shifting the burden to human activities". E&E News via Scientific American. Archived from the original on February 24, 2020.
  69. ^ Carrington, Damian (July 21, 2020) First active leak of sea-bed methane discovered in Antarctica Archived July 22, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian
  70. ^ Ravilious, Kate (July 5, 2022). "Methane much more sensitive to global heating than previously thought – study". The Guardian. Retrieved July 5, 2022.
  71. ^ Global Methane Pledge. "Homepage | Global Methane Pledge". www.globalmethanepledge.org. Retrieved August 2, 2023.
  72. ^ Forster, Piers; Smith, Chris; Rogelj, Joeri (November 2, 2021). "Guest post: The Global Methane Pledge needs to go further to help limit warming to 1.5C". Carbon Brief. Retrieved August 2, 2023.
  73. ^ IEA (2022). "Global Methane Tracker 2022". IEA. Retrieved August 2, 2023.
  74. ^ Bohrmann, Gerhard; Torres, Marta E. (2006), Schulz, Horst D.; Zabel, Matthias (eds.), "Gas Hydrates in Marine Sediments", Marine Geochemistry, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 481–512, doi:10.1007/3-540-32144-6_14, ISBN 978-3-540-32144-6
  75. ^ Miller, G. Tyler (2007). Sustaining the Earth: An Integrated Approach. U.S.: Thomson Advantage Books, p. 160. ISBN 0534496725
  76. ^ Dean, J. F. (2018). "Methane feedbacks to the global climate system in a warmer world". Reviews of Geophysics. 56 (1): 207–250. Bibcode:2018RvGeo..56..207D. doi:10.1002/2017RG000559. hdl:1874/366386.
  77. ^ a b Ruppel; Kessler (2017). "The interaction of climate change and methane hydrates". Reviews of Geophysics. 55 (1): 126–168. Bibcode:2017RvGeo..55..126R. doi:10.1002/2016RG000534. hdl:1912/8978. Archived from the original on February 7, 2020. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  78. ^ "Methane Releases From Arctic Shelf May Be Much Larger and Faster Than Anticipated" (Press release). National Science Foundation (NSF). March 10, 2010. Archived from the original on August 1, 2018. Retrieved April 6, 2018.
  79. ^ Connor, Steve (December 13, 2011). "Vast methane 'plumes' seen in Arctic ocean as sea ice retreats". The Independent. Archived from the original on December 25, 2011. Retrieved September 4, 2017.
  80. ^ "Arctic sea ice reaches lowest extent for the year and the satellite record" (Press release). The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). September 19, 2012. Archived from the original on October 4, 2012. Retrieved October 7, 2012.
  81. ^ "Frontiers 2018/19: Emerging Issues of Environmental Concern". UN Environment. Archived from the original on March 6, 2019. Retrieved March 6, 2019.
  82. ^ "Scientists shocked by Arctic permafrost thawing 70 years sooner than predicted". The Guardian. Reuters. June 18, 2019. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on October 6, 2019. Retrieved July 14, 2019.
  83. ^ Shindell, Drew; Kuylenstierna, Johan C. I.; Vignati, Elisabetta; van Dingenen, Rita; Amann, Markus; Klimont, Zbigniew; Anenberg, Susan C.; Muller, Nicholas; Janssens-Maenhout, Greet; Raes, Frank; Schwartz, Joel; Faluvegi, Greg; Pozzoli, Luca; Kupiainen, Kaarle; Höglund-Isaksson, Lena; Emberson, Lisa; Streets, David; Ramanathan, V.; Hicks, Kevin; Oanh, N. T. Kim; Milly, George; Williams, Martin; Demkine, Volodymyr; Fowler, David (January 13, 2012). "Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security". Science. 335 (6065): 183–189. Bibcode:2012Sci...335..183S. doi:10.1126/science.1210026. ISSN 1095-9203. PMID 22246768. S2CID 14113328.
  84. ^ "Porter Ranch gas leak permanently capped, officials say". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 18, 2016.
  85. ^ McGrath, Matt (February 26, 2016). "California methane leak 'largest in US history'". BBC News. Retrieved February 26, 2016.
  86. ^ Davila Fragoso, Alejandro (February 26, 2016). "The Massive Methane Blowout In Aliso Canyon Was The Largest in U.S. History". ThinkProgress. Retrieved February 26, 2016.
  87. ^ Walker, Tim (January 2, 2016). "California methane gas leak 'more damaging than Deepwater Horizon disaster'". The Independent. Archived from the original on January 4, 2016. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
  88. ^ Carrington, Damian (May 9, 2023). "'Mind-boggling' methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed". The Guardian. Retrieved May 9, 2023.
  89. ^ a b Zubrin, R. M.; Muscatello, A. C.; Berggren, M. (2013). "Integrated Mars in Situ Propellant Production System". Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 26: 43–56. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000201.
  90. ^ "Methane Blast". NASA. May 4, 2007. Archived from the original on November 16, 2019. Retrieved July 7, 2012.
  91. ^ Millar, Thomas J.; Walsh, Catherine; Field, Thomas A. (February 8, 2017). "Negative Ions in Space". Chemical Reviews. 117 (3): 1765–1795. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00480. ISSN 0009-2665. PMID 28112897.
  92. ^ Chang, Kenneth (November 2, 2012). "Hope of Methane on Mars Fades". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 8, 2019. Retrieved November 3, 2012.
  93. ^ Atreya, Sushil K.; Mahaffy, Paul R.; Wong, Ah-San (2007). "Methane and related trace species on Mars: origin, loss, implications for life, and habitability". Planetary and Space Science. 55 (3): 358–369. Bibcode:2007P&SS...55..358A. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2006.02.005. hdl:2027.42/151840.
  94. ^ Brown, Dwayne; Wendel, JoAnna; Steigerwald, Bill; Jones, Nancy; Good, Andrew (June 7, 2018). "Release 18-050 – NASA Finds Ancient Organic Material, Mysterious Methane on Mars". NASA. Archived from the original on June 7, 2018. Retrieved June 7, 2018.
  95. ^ NASA (June 7, 2018). "Ancient Organics Discovered on Mars – video (03:17)". NASA. Archived from the original on June 7, 2018. Retrieved June 7, 2018.
  96. ^ Wall, Mike (June 7, 2018). "Curiosity Rover Finds Ancient 'Building Blocks for Life' on Mars". Space.com. Archived from the original on June 7, 2018. Retrieved June 7, 2018.
  97. ^ Chang, Kenneth (June 7, 2018). "Life on Mars? Rover's Latest Discovery Puts It 'On the Table' – The identification of organic molecules in rocks on the red planet does not necessarily point to life there, past or present, but does indicate that some of the building blocks were present". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 8, 2018. Retrieved June 8, 2018.
  98. ^ Voosen, Paul (June 7, 2018). "NASA rover hits organic pay dirt on Mars". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aau3992. S2CID 115442477.
  99. ^ ten Kate, Inge Loes (June 8, 2018). "Organic molecules on Mars". Science. 360 (6393): 1068–1069. Bibcode:2018Sci...360.1068T. doi:10.1126/science.aat2662. hdl:1874/366378. PMID 29880670. S2CID 46952468.
  100. ^ Webster, Christopher R.; et al. (June 8, 2018). "Background levels of methane in Mars' atmosphere show strong seasonal variations". Science. 360 (6393): 1093–1096. Bibcode:2018Sci...360.1093W. doi:10.1126/science.aaq0131. hdl:10261/214738. PMID 29880682.
  101. ^ Eigenbrode, Jennifer L.; et al. (June 8, 2018). "Organic matter preserved in 3-billion-year-old mudstones at Gale crater, Mars". Science. 360 (6393): 1096–1101. Bibcode:2018Sci...360.1096E. doi:10.1126/science.aas9185. hdl:10044/1/60810. PMID 29880683.
  102. ^ Richardson, Derek (September 27, 2016). "Elon Musk Shows Off Interplanetary Transport System". Spaceflight Insider. Archived from the original on October 1, 2016. Retrieved October 3, 2016.
  103. ^ Oze, C.; Sharma, M. (2005). "Have olivine, will gas: Serpentinization and the abiogenic production of methane on Mars". Geophysical Research Letters. 32 (10): L10203. Bibcode:2005GeoRL..3210203O. doi:10.1029/2005GL022691. S2CID 28981740.
  104. ^ "Cassini Explores a Methane Sea on Titan". Jet Propulsion Laboratory News. April 26, 2016.
  105. ^ Committee on the Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems; Committee on the Origins and Evolution of Life; National Research Council (2007). The Limits of Organic Life in Planetary Systems. The National Academies Press. p. 74. doi:10.17226/11919. ISBN 978-0-309-10484-5.
  106. ^ McKay, C. P.; Smith, H. D. (2005). "Possibilities for methanogenic life in liquid methane on the surface of Titan". Icarus. 178 (1): 274–276. Bibcode:2005Icar..178..274M. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.05.018.
  107. ^ a b Volta, Alessandro (1777) Lettere del Signor Don Alessandro Volta ... Sull' Aria Inflammable Nativa Delle Paludi Archived November 6, 2018, at the Wayback Machine [Letters of Signor Don Alessandro Volta ... on the flammable native air of the marshes], Milan, Italy: Giuseppe Marelli.
  108. ^ Sethi, Anand Kumar (August 9, 2016). The European Edisons: Volta, Tesla, and Tigerstedt. Springer. ISBN 978-1-137-49222-7.
  109. ^ "Founders Online: From Benjamin Franklin to Joseph Priestley, 10 April 1774". founders.archives.gov. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
  110. ^ Holland, John (1841). The history and description of fossil fuel, the collieries, and coal trade of Great Britain. London, Whittaker and Co. pp. 271–272. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
  111. ^ Hofmann, A. W. (1866). "On the action of trichloride of phosphorus on the salts of the aromatic monoamines". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 15: 55–62. JSTOR 112588. Archived from the original on May 3, 2017. Retrieved June 14, 2016.; see footnote on pp. 57–58
  112. ^ McBride, James Michael (1999) "Development of systematic names for the simple alkanes". Chemistry Department, Yale University (New Haven, Connecticut). Archived March 16, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  113. ^ Harper, Douglas. "methane". Online Etymology Dictionary.
  114. ^ Jayasundara, Susantha (December 3, 2014). "Is there is any difference in expressing greenhouse gases as CH4Kg/ha and CH4-C Kg/ha?". ResearchGate. Archived from the original on October 1, 2021. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  115. ^ "User's Guide For Estimating Carbon Dioxide, Methane, And Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Agriculture Using The State Inventory Tool" (PDF). US EPA. November 26, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 1, 2021. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  116. ^ "What does CH4-C mean? – Definition of CH4-C – CH4-C stands for Methane-carbon ratio". acronymsandslang.com. Archived from the original on April 11, 2015. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  117. ^ Office of Air and Radiation, US EPA (October 7, 1999). "U.S. Methane Emissions 1990–2020: Inventories, Projections, and Opportunities for Reductions (EPA 430-R-99-013)" (PDF). ourenergypolicy.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 26, 2020. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  118. ^ "Methane". PubChem.
  119. ^ Dozolme, Philippe. "Common Mining Accidents". About.com Money. About.com. Archived from the original on November 11, 2012. Retrieved November 7, 2012.
  120. ^ Messina, Lawrence & Bluestein, Greg (April 8, 2010). "Fed official: Still too soon for W.Va. mine rescue". News.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on April 8, 2010. Retrieved April 8, 2010.
  121. ^ Osman, Karim; Geniaut, Baptiste; Herchin, Nicolas; Blanchetierre, Vincent (2015). "A review of damages observed after catastrophic events experienced in the mid-stream gas industry compared to consequences modelling tools" (PDF). Symposium Series. 160 (25). Retrieved July 1, 2022.
  122. ^ Casal, Joaquim; Gómez-Mares, Mercedes; Muñoz, Miguel; Palacios, Adriana (2012). "Jet Fires: a "Minor" Fire Hazard?" (PDF). Chemical Engineering Transactions. 26: 13–20. doi:10.3303/CET1226003. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

Cited sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Methane (CH₄) is a colorless, odorless, tasteless, and highly flammable gas at , consisting of one carbon atom covalently bonded to four atoms, making it the simplest . With a molecular weight of 16.0425 g/mol, it is lighter than air and ignites easily, producing a when burned. As the principal component of , methane is extracted from geological deposits and serves as a major fuel source for heating, , and , while also acting as a feedstock for chemicals like and . Its global emissions arise from both natural processes, such as microbial decomposition in wetlands and activity, and anthropogenic activities, including livestock digestion, extraction and use, and waste decomposition in landfills. In the atmosphere, methane functions as a potent with a lifetime of approximately 9 to 12 years before oxidation to and , exerting a 28 to 34 times that of CO₂ over a 100-year period. Despite its shorter persistence compared to CO₂, methane's rapid contributes significantly to current , with emissions exceeding natural sinks and driving rising concentrations observed since the .

Molecular Structure and Properties

Bonding and Molecular Geometry

Methane (CH₄) features a central carbon atom forming four equivalent covalent sigma bonds with hydrogen atoms. The carbon atom achieves this bonding through sp³ hybridization, in which its ground-state 2s²2p² valence electrons occupy four equivalent sp³ hybrid orbitals formed by mixing one 2s orbital and three 2p orbitals. Each sp³ orbital, containing a single , overlaps axially with a 1s orbital to create the C-H bonds, with bond energies of 429 kJ/mol. This hybridization model explains the observed equivalence of the four C-H bonds, as confirmed by spectroscopic and diffraction data showing identical bond lengths of 109 pm (1.09 Å). Without hybridization, would predict two different bond types from unhybridized p orbitals, contradicting empirical evidence of symmetry. The of methane is tetrahedral, with H-C-H bond angles measuring 109.5°. This configuration arises from the directional nature of sp³ orbitals, oriented at tetrahedral angles to maximize overlap and minimize repulsion, and aligns with for an AX₄ electron domain geometry featuring four bonding pairs and no lone pairs on carbon. The tetrahedral structure results in a nonpolar molecule, evidenced by methane's zero dipole moment, as the symmetric arrangement cancels vectorial bond polarities despite the electronegativity difference between carbon (2.55) and (2.20). of methane clathrates and studies further validate the precise geometry and bond parameters.

Physical and Thermodynamic Properties

Methane exists as a colorless, odorless, flammable gas at standard temperature and pressure (STP), with a density of 0.656 kg/m³ (0.717 g/L) at 0 °C and 1 atm. Its molar mass is 16.0425 g/mol, making it lighter than air (relative vapor density 0.55). The phase transition temperatures at 1 are a of -182.5 °C and a of -161.5 °C. Methane's critical point occurs at -82.6 °C and 4.60 MPa (45.4 ), above which it cannot be liquefied regardless of pressure. It exhibits low in , approximately 22 mg/L at 20 °C and 1 . Thermodynamic properties include a standard enthalpy of formation Δ_fH° of -74.9 kJ/mol for the gas phase at 298 . The standard enthalpy of combustion Δ_cH° is -890.4 kJ/mol at 298 . For the ideal gas at 298 , the molar heat capacity at constant pressure (C_p) is 35.7 J/mol·, and the standard entropy S° is 186.3 J/mol·.
PropertyValueConditions
Triple point temperature90.7 0.117 MPa
Critical density0.162 g/cm³Critical point
Compressibility factor (Z) at STP~1.000 limit
Data compiled from thermophysical equations of state valid up to 625 K and 1000 MPa. Methane's van der Waals constants are a = 2.25 L²·bar/mol² and b = 0.0428 L/mol, reflecting weak intermolecular forces consistent with its low temperature.

Spectroscopic and Analytical Characteristics

Methane's absorption features prominent bands corresponding to its fundamental vibrational modes. The asymmetric C-H mode (ν₃, F₂ ) produces a strong absorption at approximately 3019 cm⁻¹ (3.31 μm), while the degenerate mode (ν₄, F₂ ) appears near 1306 cm⁻¹ (7.66 μm). Weaker near- bands occur around 1.66 μm, 2.3 μm, and others due to overtones and combinations, enabling applications. The ν₂ mode (E ) is IR-active but weaker, centered near 1534 cm⁻¹.
Vibrational ModeSymmetryActivityApproximate Wavenumber (cm⁻¹)
ν₁ (symmetric stretch)A₁Raman2914
ν₂ (bending)EIR (weak)1534
ν₃ (asymmetric stretch)F₂IR, Raman3019
ν₄ (bending)F₂IR, Raman1306
Raman spectroscopy of methane highlights the symmetric ν₁ stretch at 2914 cm⁻¹, which is IR-inactive, along with ν₃ and bands extending to 5500 cm⁻¹, useful for pressure and composition analysis in gaseous mixtures like . High-pressure studies reveal broadening and shifts in these bands, reflecting intermolecular interactions. In , the ¹H NMR spectrum of methane displays a single sharp peak at 0.23 ppm (relative to TMS), indicative of its four equivalent protons in a tetrahedral environment. The ¹³C NMR signal appears at approximately -6.9 ppm, with challenges in detection due to low natural abundance and requiring multiple transients for gaseous samples. Electron ionization mass spectrometry of methane yields a molecular ion at m/z 16 (CH₄⁺•) as the base peak, with limited fragmentation to ions such as m/z 15 (CH₃⁺) and m/z 14 (CH₂⁺), reflecting the molecule's high stability and low excess energy in . Analytical detection of methane commonly employs with detection (GC-FID) for precise quantification in complex mixtures, offering parts-per-billion sensitivity. Optical methods, including (TDLAS) targeting the 3.3 μm band and , enable real-time, non-contact monitoring in environmental and industrial settings. Thermal conductivity detectors are also used for bulk gas analysis per EPA Method 3C.

Chemical Reactivity

Combustion and Oxidation Processes

Methane combusts exothermically with oxygen to form and as primary products under sufficient oxygen supply. The stoichiometric reaction is CH₄(g) + 2O₂(g) → CO₂(g) + 2H₂O(l), releasing 890 kJ/mol of heat at standard conditions. This process powers combustion in industrial furnaces, power plants, and domestic heating, where methane constitutes the main component. In air at stoichiometric conditions, the adiabatic flame temperature reaches approximately 2230 K, enabling efficient energy release but requiring control to minimize emissions. Combustion initiates via radical chain reactions, with high activation energies for C-H bond cleavage around 100-200 kJ/mol in uncatalyzed gas-phase processes, necessitating ignition sources or elevated temperatures above 800 K for sustained reaction. Incomplete combustion occurs under oxygen-limited conditions, producing carbon monoxide and elemental carbon (soot) alongside water, as in 2CH₄ + 3O₂ → 2CO + 4H₂O or further reduction to C(s). These byproducts pose health risks and reduce efficiency, prompting catalytic converters in engines to favor complete oxidation. Beyond direct combustion, methane undergoes to (CO + H₂) via CH₄ + ½O₂ → CO + 2H₂, an at high temperatures (1000-1500 ) used in reforming for . Atmospheric oxidation dominates methane's natural sink, where tropospheric hydroxyl radicals (·OH) abstract a : CH₄ + ·OH → ·CH₃ + H₂O, followed by sequential reactions yielding CO₂, H₂O, and oxidized intermediates like . This radical-initiated chain, comprising ~90% of removal, imparts methane a lifetime of about 9 years, modulated by ·OH concentrations influenced by and pollutants. The initial step exhibits low (~30 kJ/mol), but overall kinetics depend on ·OH abundance, with perturbations from emissions affecting global oxidative capacity.

Radical and Free Radical Reactions

Methane's free radical reactions primarily involve by a radical , yielding the methyl radical (CH₃•), as the C-H bond dissociation energy is 439 kJ/mol, rendering direct electrophilic or nucleophilic attack unfavorable. These processes require by heat, light, or other energy sources to generate radicals, followed by chain propagation and termination steps. A canonical example is the chlorination of methane to form (CH₃Cl), which occurs via a free radical chain mechanism under irradiation or conditions above 250°C. involves homolytic cleavage: Cl₂ → 2 Cl•. proceeds through Cl• + CH₄ → HCl + CH₃• (endothermic, rate-determining) and CH₃• + Cl₂ → CH₃Cl + Cl• (exothermic). Termination occurs via radical recombination, such as 2 Cl• → Cl₂ or CH₃• + Cl• → CH₃Cl. The reaction exhibits low selectivity, producing polychlorinated byproducts like if excess is present, necessitating controlled conditions for monochlorination. Similar mechanisms apply to bromination, though slower due to higher endothermicity in the hydrogen abstraction step (CH₃-H BDE exceeds Cl• reactivity), while fluorination is highly exothermic and explosive. In the , methane's primary sink is reaction with the (OH•): CH₄ + OH• → CH₃• + H₂O, with a rate constant of (6.49 ± 0.22) × 10^{-15} cm³ molecule⁻¹ s⁻¹ at 298 K and an of approximately 14.1 kJ/mol. This abstraction initiates oxidative degradation, where the ensuing CH₃• rapidly reacts with O₂ to form peroxy radicals, ultimately yielding CO₂, H₂O, and oxidized products over days to years, depending on OH concentrations (typically 10⁵–10⁶ molecules cm⁻³). Variations in global OH levels, influenced by factors like emissions and , directly modulate methane's atmospheric lifetime, estimated at 9–10 years. Other radical interactions, such as with H• or O• in high-temperature , contribute to dimerization (2 CH₃• → C₂H₆) but are less dominant under ambient conditions.

Acid-Base and Other Reactions

Methane displays negligible acidity under standard conditions, with an estimated pKa of approximately 48–50 for the C–H bond, rendering feasible only with exceptionally strong bases such as alkyllithium s. The resulting methyl anion (CH₃⁻) manifests in organometallic compounds like (CH₃Li), which serves as a nucleophilic in synthetic chemistry but does not occur via simple acid-base equilibrium in protic solvents due to the anion's high reactivity and basicity. Conversely, methane acts as a weak Lewis base and undergoes in media, such as (a 1:1 mixture of , HSO₃F, and , SbF₅), to yield the cation (CH₅⁺). This , characterized by a , represents the strongest known Bronsted acid and enables subsequent transformations including hydrogen isotope exchange (e.g., with D₂SO₄) and alkane polycondensation at temperatures around -60 °C to 0 °C. Such protonation highlights methane's latent basicity under extreme acidic conditions (H₀ < -20 on the Hammett scale), though CH₅⁺ decomposes rapidly above -10 °C, limiting practical applications. Beyond acid-base behavior, methane engages in heterolytic C–H activation on metal oxide surfaces, such as γ-alumina (γ-Al₂O₃), where Lewis acid sites (Al³⁺) and basic sites (O²⁻) facilitate bond cleavage without free radicals. Computational studies indicate that this process involves adsorption of methane followed by stepwise proton transfer to surface oxygen, yielding surface-bound methyl species and hydrogen, with activation barriers lowered by the oxide's acid-base pairing. In catalytic reforming, methane reacts with steam (CH₄ + H₂O → CO + 3H₂) or carbon dioxide (dry reforming: CH₄ + CO₂ → 2CO + 2H₂) over nickel-based catalysts at 700–1000 °C, proceeding via associative mechanisms that include heterolytic splitting rather than purely homolytic radical paths. These reactions underpin industrial hydrogen production but require high temperatures to overcome methane's kinetic inertness, with coke formation posing deactivation risks.

Natural Sources and Occurrence

Geological Formation and Reservoirs

Methane in geological contexts primarily originates from two processes: thermogenic decomposition of organic matter and biogenic microbial activity. Thermogenic methane forms through the thermal cracking of kerogen in sedimentary source rocks during catagenesis, typically at temperatures between 157°C and 221°C and under elevated pressures in the "gas window" of burial depths exceeding 2-3 km. This process breaks down complex organic molecules into simpler hydrocarbons, with methane dominating in the post-mature metagenesis stage where higher hydrocarbons are further cracked. Biogenic methane, generated by anaerobic methanogenic archaea reducing CO₂ or acetate from recent organic sediments, occurs at shallower depths and lower temperatures (below 80°C), contributing over 20% of global natural gas resources, particularly in coal beds and marine shales. Distinguishing these origins relies on isotopic signatures and formation temperature proxies, such as clumped isotope thermometry, which confirm thermogenic gases form at higher temperatures than biogenic ones. Geological reservoirs trap methane generated from these processes, classified as conventional or unconventional based on rock permeability and extraction methods. Conventional reservoirs consist of porous sandstone or carbonate formations with high permeability (often >10 millidarcies), sealed by impermeable cap rocks like or evaporites, allowing migration and accumulation under hydrostatic pressure; these are typically accessed via vertical wells and include major fields like those in the Permian Basin. Unconventional reservoirs, by contrast, feature low-permeability matrices (e.g., <0.1 millidarcies) where methane is stored adsorbed on or as free gas, requiring hydraulic fracturing or horizontal drilling for production; key types include (e.g., Marcellus Shale), (CBM) from adsorbed gas in coal seams, tight sandstone/carbonate gas, and methane hydrates in or marine sediments. reservoirs generate and retain gas due to their fine-grained, organic-rich composition, differing from conventional traps by lacking discrete structural or stratigraphic seals. Methane also escapes reservoirs via natural seeps, providing surface indicators of subsurface accumulations. Onshore macro-seeps and diffuse microseepage, along with submarine seeps, release methane from faulted structural highs or eroded , with global geological emissions mapped into categories including geothermal manifestations; isotopic analysis distinguishes these thermogenic or mixed sources from anthropogenic leaks. Methane hydrates represent a vast but technically challenging , forming clathrate structures in low-temperature, high- sediments; USGS estimates global resources at 100,000 to 300,000,000 trillion cubic feet (TCF), though recoverability remains uncertain due to stability dependencies on and temperature. In regions like the , hydrate resources are assessed at 53.8 TCF, underscoring their potential scale relative to conventional gas. These ' economic viability hinges on geological controls like source rock maturity, migration pathways, and trap integrity, with thermogenic dominance in deeper basins reflecting causal links between burial history and generation.

Biological Methanogenesis

Biological methanogenesis is the anaerobic process by which methanogenic archaea produce methane as a metabolic end product, utilizing substrates including carbon dioxide with hydrogen, acetate, or methylated C1 compounds. These organisms, exclusive to the Archaea domain, function as obligate anaerobes and terminal electron sinks in microbial consortia, preventing hydrogen accumulation that would otherwise inhibit upstream fermentative bacteria. Methanogenesis proceeds via three principal pathways: hydrogenotrophic, reducing CO2 to CH4 using H2 as (CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 + 2H2O); acetoclastic, splitting into equal parts CH4 and CO2 (CH3COO⁻ + H⁺ → CH4 + CO2); and methylotrophic, deriving CH4 from , methylamines, or methyl sulfides. The hydrogenotrophic route predominates in hydrogen-rich settings, supporting interspecies hydrogen transfer, while acetoclastic accounts for roughly two-thirds of biogenic methane in many sediments. All pathways converge on a shared core mechanism after initial substrate activation, culminating in the reduction of methyl-coenzyme M by coenzyme B, catalyzed by nickel-containing methyl-coenzyme M reductase. Methanogens inhabit oxygen-excluding environments such as anoxic sediments, wetlands, peatlands, foreguts, hindguts, and deep-sea hydrothermal systems, often under extreme conditions of high , , or . In natural wetlands, these drive substantial methane flux, with process-based models estimating average emissions of 152.67 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ globally from 2001 to 2020, modulated by , , and substrate availability. Biochemical adaptations include unique cofactors like coenzyme F420 for and methanofuran for formyl group handling, enabling through a proton-translocating distinct from bacterial systems. In digestion, rumen methanogens like Methanobrevibacter species consume H2 and CO2 generated by microbial of plant polysaccharides, yielding up to 200–500 L CH4 per kg intake in , facilitating efficient volatile production for host energy but representing a loss of caloric potential. This syntrophic role underscores methanogenesis's ecological necessity in anaerobic degradation, though it contributes ~14.5% of agricultural greenhouse gases via . Suppression strategies, such as inhibitors, can reduce emissions by over 30% without disrupting function, highlighting targeted interventions' feasibility.

Extraterrestrial Detection

Methane has been detected in the atmosphere of Mars through measurements by the Curiosity rover, which recorded a transient spike reaching approximately 21 parts per billion (ppb) on June 15, 2013, in Gale Crater, confirmed independently by the Mars Express orbiter. Subsequent observations by Curiosity revealed background methane levels fluctuating seasonally, peaking at low concentrations during warmer summer months and dropping in winter, with average values around 0.4 ppb. These detections remain sporadic and at trace levels, prompting debate over instrument contamination or abiotic sources like serpentinization, as some analyses question the reliability of prior rover data due to potential terrestrial methane interference in the Sample Analysis at Mars tunable laser spectrometer. On Saturn's moon Titan, the Cassini-Huygens mission identified methane as a dominant atmospheric constituent, comprising roughly 5% of the nitrogen-rich air, with evidence of methane clouds forming over 13 years of observations from 2004 to 2017. Radar and spectrometric data from Cassini flybys confirmed large seas and lakes on Titan's surface primarily composed of liquid methane, such as , with purity estimates exceeding 99% in some regions based on 2016 measurements. These hydrocarbons, including methane, , and deposits, indicate cryovolcanic and photochemical processes sustaining Titan's methane cycle, distinct from biotic origins on . Methane has been observed in cometary comae and nuclei, with high-dispersion detecting it in comets such as C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake) in 1996 alongside and . Similar abundances were noted in other long-period comets, suggesting methane's incorporation during formation in the or outer solar nebula, preserved in ices. In the , methane forms via gas-phase reactions and has been inferred from absorption spectra toward star-forming regions, predating its trapping in cometary ices. Beyond the solar system, the (JWST) detected methane in the atmosphere of the "warm Jupiter" WASP-80 b in December 2023, marking an early confirmation of the in a non-solar system giant planet's spectrum via transmission photometry. JWST observations have also revealed methane alongside in sub-Neptune , though hazy atmospheres complicate interpretations, with no conclusive evidence linking detections to life as of 2025. These findings, analyzed through , highlight methane's role as a potential tracer of formation environments and chemistry in diverse exoplanetary systems.

Anthropogenic Production and Emissions

The primary sectors responsible for anthropogenic methane emissions are agriculture (roughly 32-40%), fossil fuels (about 35%), and waste (about 20%).

Industrial Synthesis Methods

The principal industrial method for synthesizing methane entails the of carbonaceous feedstocks such as or to produce —a mixture primarily comprising (CO), (H₂), and (CO₂)—followed by catalytic to convert the syngas into methane (CH₄). Gasification occurs in reactors under high temperature (typically 1,200–1,500°C) and pressure (20–40 bar) with controlled oxygen and steam, yielding a syngas with a H₂:CO ratio adjustable via water-gas shift reactions (CO + H₂O ⇌ CO₂ + H₂). This approach enables the production of (SNG) compatible with existing infrastructure, though it accounts for a small fraction of global methane supply compared to extraction from geological reservoirs. Methanation, the core synthesis step, proceeds via two exothermic reactions: CO + 3H₂ → CH₄ + H₂O (ΔH = -206 kJ/mol) and CO₂ + 4H₂ → CH₄ + 2H₂O (ΔH = -165 kJ/mol), typically catalyzed by -supported on alumina or similar supports at 200–400°C and 20–40 bar. Due to the highly exothermic nature, employ multi-stage adiabatic fixed-bed reactors with intercooling to prevent catalyst and hotspots exceeding 800°C, achieving methane yields over 90% in with appropriate H₂/CO ratios (around 3:1 after shifts). purification precedes methanation to remove , particulates, and tars, often via removal (e.g., Rectisol process) and , as contaminants poison catalysts. Commercial-scale implementation has historically relied on , as exemplified by the Great Plains Synfuels Plant in Beulah, , operational since January 1985, which processes 6,000 tons per day of via 14 Lurgi dry-ash gasifiers to generate methanated into approximately 137 million standard cubic feet per day of pipeline-quality SNG (95%+ CH₄). Similar facilities, such as those developed by in during the 1950s–1980s, integrated Lurgi with fixed-bed methanation for SNG and other hydrocarbons, though economic viability has waned with low post-1980s. for SNG follows analogous routes but operates at smaller scales (e.g., pilot plants producing 1,000–10,000 Nm³/h), with challenges including lower and higher formation requiring advanced cleanup. An alternative synthesis route, the Sabatier process, directly hydrogenates CO₂ with H₂ (CO₂ + 4H₂ → CH₄ + 2H₂O) using or catalysts at 250–400°C, primarily for applications integrating renewable electricity-derived H₂ from . While demonstrated in demonstration plants (e.g., Audi's Werlte facility in producing 1,000 Nm³/h SNG since 2013 from CO₂), it remains limited to pilot or modular scales due to high H₂ costs and energy inefficiencies, with no large baseload industrial plants as of 2023. In contexts like , serves purification by trace conversion of COₓ to CH₄, but yields negligible bulk methane. Overall, SNG synthesis via gasification- contributes modestly to anthropogenic methane, constrained by feedstock costs and competition from conventional sources.

Fossil Fuel Sector Emissions

The sector, including oil and operations and , is a primary anthropogenic source of methane, contributing over one-third of global human-related emissions. In 2024, the energy sector as a whole emitted approximately 145 million tonnes (Mt) of methane, with activities—predominantly oil, gas, and —accounting for the bulk, equivalent to roughly 200 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas lost that could otherwise have been captured. These emissions stem from leaks, intentional venting for safety or operational reasons, and incomplete combustion during flaring, occurring across upstream extraction, midstream processing and transport, and downstream distribution. Oil and operations represent the largest share within the sector, with the (IEA) estimating 80 Mt of emissions in 2023, though independent analyses suggest figures up to 120 Mt when reconciling satellite data and ground measurements. Upstream activities, such as and well completion, contribute about 50-60% of these, driven by pneumatic device venting, equipment leaks, and flaring inefficiencies; for example, global flaring volumes exceeded 140 bcm in 2023, releasing unburnt methane. Downstream leaks from pipelines and storage add 20-30%, with urban distribution networks in regions like and showing persistent high rates due to aging . Super-emitter events, defined as single sources releasing over 500 kg/hour, spiked by 50% in 2023 compared to 2022, highlighting concentrated risks from faulty seals and valves. Coal mining emissions, estimated at 41.8 Mt globally in recent years, arise mainly from underground extraction where coalbed methane desorbs during mining and post-mining drainage. Underground operations emit up to ten times more per tonne of coal than surface mining, with China, India, and the United States as top contributors due to their reliance on deep shafts; for instance, U.S. coal mines released about 2.4 Mt in 2017, with 16% from abandoned sites. Surface mines, while lower in intensity, involve fugitive releases from overburden and stockpile handling, often underestimated in inventories. Overall sector emissions have trended upward since 2020, reaching near-record levels in 2023 despite pledges under initiatives like the Global Methane Pledge, as production expansions in developing regions outpace abatement efforts. Estimates vary due to methodological differences: bottom-up approaches relying on self-reported equipment factors often yield lower figures (e.g., industry submissions to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change), while top-down methods using atmospheric inversions and satellites like TROPOMI detect 20-50% higher totals, revealing underreporting in regions with lax monitoring such as Russia and the Middle East. The IEA notes that around 70% of methane could be mitigated using proven technologies like and repair or vapor recovery, though implementation lags owing to uneven regulatory enforcement and measurement gaps.

Agricultural, Waste, and Other Human Sources

Agriculture contributes approximately 40% of global anthropogenic methane emissions, primarily through livestock enteric fermentation, rice cultivation, and manure management. Enteric fermentation in ruminant animals, such as cattle, sheep, and goats, accounts for about 32% of anthropogenic methane, generated by methanogenic archaea in the rumen that convert hydrogen and carbon dioxide into methane as a metabolic byproduct during digestion of fibrous feeds. Global estimates place enteric emissions at around 128 million metric tons (Mt) annually, with cattle responsible for the majority due to their population and digestive physiology; for instance, dairy and beef herds in countries like India, Brazil, and the United States drive significant shares, though per-animal emissions vary by breed, diet, and feed additives like seaweed or nitrate supplements that can reduce output by 20-80% in trials. Rice paddies contribute roughly 8% of anthropogenic methane through anaerobic of in flooded fields, where methanogens thrive in oxygen-depleted soils; emissions total about 30-40 Mt per year, influenced by cultivation practices such as water management— reduces methane by up to 48% by aerating soil—and varietal selection, with short-duration hybrids emitting less than traditional long-duration ones. management adds another 10-15 Mt globally, stemming from anaerobic storage in lagoons or heaps where undigested organics ferment; emissions are higher in liquid systems common in intensive operations versus solid composting, and covered anaerobic digesters can capture up to 90% for use, though adoption remains low outside . Waste sector emissions, including and , comprise about 20% of anthropogenic methane, or roughly 80 Mt annually. landfills generate methane via anaerobic breakdown of organics like food scraps, which account for over 50% of landfill methane in the U.S., equivalent to emissions from 24 million passenger vehicles in 2022; global figures are higher in developing regions with open dumps, though capture technologies like gas-to-energy plants recover 10-20% in advanced systems. , particularly from domestic and industrial sources, emits 10-20 Mt through anaerobic , with centralized plants in urban areas contributing more than decentralized systems; upgrading to aerobic processes or recovery mitigates this, but underestimation in inventories—up to 50% higher in some U.S. landfill assessments—highlights measurement challenges. Other human sources include biomass burning from agricultural residue, savanna fires, and , contributing 5-10% of total methane or 30-60 Mt yearly, as incomplete releases methane alongside CO2 and particulates; emissions peak during dry seasons in regions like and , with controlled burning practices reducing yields compared to wildfires. These sources collectively underscore human influence on the methane cycle, with and dominating non-fossil anthropogenic emissions, though bottom-up inventories often diverge from satellite-inferred top-down estimates by 20-50%, reflecting uncertainties in activity data and emission factors.

Economic and Industrial Applications

Fuel Utilization

Methane serves as the principal combustible component in , which typically comprises 70-90% methane by volume, enabling its widespread use in production. The complete of methane follows the reaction CH₄ + 2O₂ → CO₂ + 2H₂O, releasing approximately 55 MJ/kg of under standard conditions, higher on a mass basis than many liquid fuels like (22.7 MJ/kg) but lower than diesel or per unit volume when compressed or liquefied. This high and relatively clean burn—producing primarily and —make methane preferable to for reducing particulate and emissions in applications. In electricity generation, natural gas-fired power dominate global capacity additions, with combined-cycle achieving thermal efficiencies of up to 46% on average, compared to 33% for . Simple-cycle gas turbines operate at 35-42% efficiency, suitable for peaking power, while combined cycles recover for steam generation, boosting output. Global consumption for power reached record levels in , driven by U.S. demand that increased generation by over 5% in the first nine months, offsetting declines and supporting grid reliability amid variable renewables. Residential and commercial sectors consume for heating and cooking, accounting for about 40% of U.S. usage in , where its infrastructure delivers it at efficiencies exceeding 90% from to end-use when minimizing leaks. For transportation, methane is deployed as (CNG) at 3,600 psi for light- and medium-duty vehicles or (LNG) at -162°C for heavy-duty trucks and ships, offering volumetric densities closer to diesel while emitting 20-30% less CO₂ per mile. CNG vehicles, common in fleets, store methane in high-pressure cylinders and ignite via spark plugs, with global adoption exceeding 25 million units as of 2023, particularly in and for urban buses. LNG enables long-haul applications by cryogenic storage, reducing boil-off losses to under 0.5% daily, and supports where it cuts and emissions by up to 90% relative to heavy fuel oil. Renewable sources like upgrade to biomethane (96-98% purity) for injection into CNG/LNG systems, displacing fossil methane without changes. Overall, demand, largely methane-driven, totaled around 4,239 billion cubic meters in 2023, rising 2.8% in 2024, with the U.S. consuming over 900 billion cubic meters annually.

Chemical Feedstock Roles

Methane functions primarily as a feedstock for synthesis gas (, a mixture of and ) production through steam methane reforming (SMR), where methane reacts with steam at temperatures of 700–1000°C over nickel-based catalysts to yield CO + 3H2. This accounts for the majority of industrial syngas generation from , enabling downstream synthesis of key chemicals. Syngas from methane serves as the foundational input for ammonia production via the Haber-Bosch process, in which nitrogen from air reacts with hydrogen under high pressure and temperature (around 200 atm and 400–500°C) with iron catalysts to form NH3. Globally, over 90% of ammonia—totaling approximately 180 million tonnes annually—is derived from natural gas feedstocks like methane, primarily supporting nitrogen fertilizer manufacture essential for agriculture. Methane-based routes dominate due to the hydrogen content of natural gas, though coal and other hydrocarbons contribute smaller shares. Methanol synthesis represents another major application, with syngas converted catalytically (typically copper-zinc oxide catalysts at 200–300°C and 50–100 bar) to CH3OH via CO + 2H2 → CH3OH. Worldwide methanol output reached about 98 million tonnes per year as of 2021, with fossil methane comprising 57% of feedstocks, far exceeding (around 40%) or other sources; routes are favored for their efficiency and lower capital costs compared to . Methanol then intermediates further chemicals, including (via oxidation, used in resins and adhesives), acetic acid (via , for and solvents), and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) as a , underscoring methane's indirect role in ~20% of global organic chemical production by volume. Additional niche roles include methane's thermal decomposition for (used in tires and pigments), yielding up to 15 million tonnes annually worldwide, and for hydrogen peroxide precursors, though these represent under 5% of methane's chemical utilization compared to syngas pathways. Emerging processes like aim to produce and solid carbon without CO2 emissions, but as of 2023, they constitute less than 1% of output from methane, limited by energy intensity and scale-up challenges. Overall, methane's feedstock value stems from its high hydrogen-to-carbon ratio (4:1), enabling energy-efficient conversion to H2-rich streams, though SMR inherently emits CO2 (about 7–10 kg per kg H2 produced), prompting research into autothermal reforming hybrids for reduced intensity.

Emerging and Niche Uses

Methane serves as a carbon source in (CVD) processes for synthesizing , where high-purity methane is mixed with and activated by plasma or hot filaments to deposit carbon atoms onto substrates, enabling production of industrial-grade synthetic used in cutting tools and . Growth rates in hot filament CVD increase with methane concentrations up to certain thresholds, typically 1-16%, depending on temperature and pressure conditions. In emerging catalytic conversions, a hybrid catalyst combining iron-modified and alcohol oxidase enzyme, developed by MIT researchers in 2024, transforms methane into at and , facilitating its use in polymers for materials like particleboard and textiles. Similarly, microwave plasma technology from Levidian, deployed in pilot systems by 2025, dissociates waste methane into hydrogen fuel and solid , the latter enhancing tire durability, strength, and tear resistance while capturing emissions. Liquid methane has gained traction in rocket propulsion for reusable launch vehicles, offering higher and cleaner than , as exemplified by SpaceX's Raptor engines introduced in the late 2010s, which pair it with for missions and enable in-situ resource utilization on Mars via reaction-derived propellant. Methane's lower cost and compatibility with cryogenic storage support scalability in upper-stage and reaction control engines. In , methanotrophic convert methane into value-added bioproducts such as , single-cell proteins, and biofuels, with applications in niche and high-performance biomaterials exhibiting unique properties like enhanced biodegradability. Therapeutically, exogenous methane demonstrates anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects in preclinical models of ischemia-reperfusion and oxidative stress, acting rapidly to mitigate cellular damage without toxicity at low doses. These biological roles position methane as a potential adjunct in treating inflammatory conditions, though clinical translation remains exploratory.

Role in Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate

Global Sources, Sinks, and Budget

The global methane (CH₄) budget quantifies annual emissions from natural and anthropogenic sources against removal by atmospheric and surface sinks, with the difference driving observed increases in atmospheric concentrations. Top-down estimates, derived from atmospheric inversions and observations, place mean total sources at 576 Tg CH₄ yr⁻¹ (range: 550–594 Tg) for 2000–2019, while bottom-up inventories from sector-specific data yield higher values of 669 Tg yr⁻¹ (512–849 Tg), highlighting uncertainties in process-based modeling. Anthropogenic emissions constitute 60–65% of the total, approximately 360 Tg yr⁻¹ in the 2010s, with natural sources at around 206–248 Tg yr⁻¹; this fraction has risen over time due to expanded human activities, though exact partitioning remains debated owing to overlaps like indirect wetland influences from agriculture. Key sources are summarized below, with top-down and bottom-up means for 2000–2019 (uncertainty ranges in parentheses):
CategoryBottom-Up (Tg yr⁻¹)Top-Down (Tg yr⁻¹)
Natural
Wetlands248 (159–369)194 (176–212)
Other (freshwaters, geological, , termites, wild animals)~130–180 (variable)~50–60
Anthropogenic
Fossil fuels120 (117–125)116 (95–137)
& 211 (195–231)243 (223–263)
& burning28 (21–39)23 (19–27)
Total669 (512–849)576 (550–594)
Agriculture dominates anthropogenic emissions via in ruminants and rice paddies, while extraction and leakage—estimated at 120 Tg in 2023 by sector inventories—represent a significant but measurable fraction amenable to . Natural wetlands, sensitive to temperature and , form the largest single source but exhibit high variability and potential feedbacks from . Sinks primarily involve tropospheric oxidation by hydroxyl (OH) radicals, accounting for ~90% of removal at 503 Tg yr⁻¹ (487–519 Tg) over 2000–2019, with soil microbial uptake at 29 Tg yr⁻¹ (25–33 Tg) and stratospheric loss at ~30 Tg yr⁻¹. OH sink efficiency depends on radical concentrations, which can fluctuate with emissions and ; temporary reductions, as in 2020 amid lower pollution, contributed to accelerated growth. The net budget imbalance—sources exceeding sinks—manifests as atmospheric accumulation of ~44 Tg yr⁻¹ (38–50 Tg) top-down for 2000–2019, equivalent to a growth rate accelerating to ~15–20 ppb yr⁻¹ recently, pushing global mean concentrations to 1923 ppb in 2023 (2.66 times pre-industrial levels). Discrepancies between top-down (observation-constrained) and bottom-up (emission-inventory) approaches underscore needs for improved measurements, particularly in underrepresented natural and waste sectors. Atmospheric methane concentrations have more than doubled since pre-industrial levels of approximately 722 (ppb), reaching an annual global average of 1915.73 ppb in 2023 and 1921.79 ppb in 2024, as measured by the NOAA Global Monitoring through a network of surface flask samples and in-situ observations from global sites. These measurements reflect a long-term upward trend driven by net emissions exceeding sinks, with concentrations stabilizing briefly in the late 1990s to early 2000s before accelerating post-2006 at rates exceeding prior decades. Recent data indicate record-high growth rates in the early 2020s, with the annual increase peaking at 17.69 ± 0.36 ppb in 2021, followed by 12.96 ± 0.39 ppb in 2022 and 8.63 ± 0.78 ppb in 2023, before a reported ~9 ppb rise in 2024. Monthly global means continued upward into 2025, reaching 1933.54 ppb in May, compared to 1925.71 ppb in May 2024, based on NOAA's updated dataset as of September 2025. This acceleration aligns with satellite observations from NASA's measurements, which extend the record and confirm hemispheric gradients, with higher concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere due to predominant anthropogenic sources.
YearAnnual Increase (ppb)Uncertainty (± ppb)
14.840.53
17.690.36
12.960.39
20238.630.78
The observed trends derive from direct empirical sampling rather than models, with NOAA's data processing accounting for seasonal cycles and interannual variability through baseline fitting techniques. While some analyses attribute recent surges partly to tropical emissions amplified by anomalies like the 2020-2021 La Niña, the concentration records themselves remain robust and independent of source attribution debates. Overall, from 2019-2023, the average annual increase averaged 13.2 ± 3.5 ppb, surpassing the 9.1 ± 2.4 ppb mean of the preceding two decades.

Greenhouse Effect: Mechanisms and Global Warming Potential

Methane functions as a by absorbing radiation in the atmosphere, primarily through its vibrational and rotational modes that correspond to wavelengths emitted by Earth's surface. These absorption bands occur mainly around 3.3 micrometers (ν3 asymmetric stretch) and 7.7 micrometers (ν4 bending mode), which overlap with the peak of Earth's blackbody in the range. Upon absorption, methane molecules become excited and subsequently re-emit photons in random directions, including downward toward the surface, thereby reducing the net and contributing to atmospheric warming. This process enhances the natural , with methane's per-molecule radiative efficiency approximately 28 times that of CO2 due to its stronger absorption in atmospheric windows partially occupied by . The (GWP) of methane quantifies its time-integrated relative to an equivalent mass of CO2 over a specified horizon, accounting for both direct absorption and indirect effects such as stratospheric production and tropospheric formation. Over a 100-year timescale, methane's GWP is estimated at 27-30 without climate-carbon feedbacks, rising to 29.8-34 when including those feedbacks, reflecting its potent but transient impact. On shorter 20-year horizons, the GWP increases to 81-84, emphasizing methane's outsized role in near-term warming given its atmospheric lifetime of approximately 12 years, during which it is primarily oxidized by hydroxyl radicals (OH). Methane's lifetime and forcing are influenced by ; reactions with OH reduce its concentration, but factors like rising CO emissions can deplete OH, potentially extending methane's persistence and amplifying its cumulative effect. from anthropogenic methane has contributed about 0.5 W/m² since pre-industrial times, roughly 16% of total well-mixed GHG forcing, though its short allows reductions to yield faster cooling than equivalent CO2 cuts. These metrics derive from spectroscopic data and atmospheric models validated against observations, underscoring methane's causal role in radiative imbalance despite debates over indirect multiplier assumptions in GWP calculations.

Empirical Impacts vs. Model Projections

Empirical assessments of methane's , derived directly from observed atmospheric concentrations, yield a value of approximately 0.48 W/m² since preindustrial times, closely matching calculations from spectroscopic models and aligning with the observed rise from 722 ppb in to 1923 ppb in 2022. This forcing accounts for roughly 25% of the total long-lived contribution to current , with attribution studies estimating methane's role in observed surface warming at 0.1–0.2°C out of the 1.1°C total since 1850, consistent with integrated effects over its ~9–12-year lifetime. However, general circulation models (GCMs) used for attribution often embed this forcing within broader simulations, where discrepancies emerge due to varying representations of chemical feedbacks, such as methane's influence on tropospheric and stratospheric , which amplify forcing by 20–50% in models but are constrained by satellite observations showing more modest adjustments. A notable divergence arises in the treatment of methane's shortwave (solar) absorption, which empirical calculations indicate offsets 25–30% of its trapping effect at the surface, reducing net warming and wetting tendencies compared to -only estimates. Many climate models, particularly pre-2020 vintages in CMIP5 and early CMIP6 ensembles, omit or undervalue this absorption, leading to overestimations of methane-driven surface responses by up to 30% in idealized forcing experiments validated against line-by-line radiative codes. Observations from surface towers and campaigns further reveal that model-projected —key to feedbacks—overpredict seasonal variability and underestimate cold-season suppression, contributing to inflated projections of natural source amplification under 1–2°C warming. These gaps imply that hindcasted methane contributions to 20th-century warming in high-sensitivity models exceed detected signals from paleoclimate proxies and instrumental records, where transient efficacy (warming per unit forcing) for methane appears 10–20% lower than for CO2 due to rapid vertical redistribution and effects. Projections of future methane impacts in scenarios like SSP2-4.5 amplify these issues, with integrated assessment models forecasting 0.2–0.5°C additional warming by 2100 from unchecked emissions, yet refined metrics like GWP*—calibrated to empirical decay rates—demonstrate that stabilizing concentrations curbs near-term warming more effectively than 100-year GWP implies, avoiding overstatement of short-lived climate forcers in policy contexts. Empirical isotopic and budget analyses, including and EPA inventories cross-validated against EDGARv6.0 and GOSAT inversions, highlight persistent underreporting of sources by 20–60%, but translation to temperature hinges on equilibrium estimates (2–4.5°C per CO2 doubling), where low-end values aligned with observed-to-modeled warming ratios temper alarmist narratives from high-end ensemble members. Mainstream projections from bodies like the IPCC, reliant on multi-model means, exhibit upward bias toward hotter outcomes partly due to incomplete shortwave physics and optimistic emission baselines, underscoring the need for observation-constrained tuning to reconcile simulations with detected signals.

Clathrates, Feedback Loops, and Long-Term Risks

Methane clathrates, also known as gas hydrates, consist of methane molecules enclosed within a lattice of water molecules, stable under conditions of low temperature and found in regions and marine sediments. Global estimates indicate that these deposits may contain between 500 and 2,500 gigatons of in methane, far exceeding conventional reserves, though extraction feasibility remains limited. Their stability is governed by thermodynamic equilibria, with dissociation occurring when temperatures rise above approximately 0–10°C or pressures drop, depending on depth and . In permafrost areas, particularly the , warming has led to observed thaw and localized methane emissions from degrading , but large-scale abrupt releases remain undetected as of 2025. Shallow shelf deposits, such as those in the East Siberian Shelf, are considered more vulnerable due to thinner covers and proximity to surface warming, with seismic data suggesting destabilization of up to 2.5 gigatons of in some models, though empirical confirmation of atmospheric impacts is sparse. Recent seabed surveys in have detected elevated methane fluxes potentially linked to dissociation, but these are confined and do not indicate imminent global escalation. Feedback loops arise when hydrate dissociation releases methane, which acts as a potent with a 28–34 times that of CO2 over 100 years, potentially accelerating regional warming and further thaw. In permafrost systems, this could amplify emissions from both hydrates and underlying decomposition, with studies estimating that a 1–3°C rise might mobilize 10–50 gigatons of methane over centuries, though kinetic barriers like slow limit rapid venting. feedbacks, intertwined with thaw, have shown empirical increases in methane output—up to 20–30% higher emissions in warming experiments—but clathrate-specific contributions are harder to isolate and often overstated in integrated climate models compared to direct observations. Long-term risks include geohazards like seafloor slope failure from hydrate collapse, which could trigger submarine landslides, and sustained methane pulses exacerbating warming beyond linear projections. The "clathrate gun" hypothesis posits past abrupt releases drove Quaternary warmings, but modern analogs lack evidence of self-sustaining runaway effects, as released methane oxidizes to CO2 within decades and hydrate reformation can occur under stabilizing conditions. Projections of 85% hydrate loss under 3°C ocean warming overlook millennial-scale dynamics and overestimate short-term atmospheric burdens, with empirical data from ongoing Arctic monitoring showing gradual rather than catastrophic trends. Uncertainties persist due to incomplete mapping—only about 10–20% of potential deposits surveyed—and model sensitivities to parameters like sediment permeability, underscoring that while risks exist, they are not poised for near-term dominance absent extreme warming scenarios.

Mitigation Efforts and Controversies

Technological and Policy Interventions

Technological interventions to mitigate anthropogenic methane emissions primarily target major sources such as operations, landfills, , and . In the oil and gas sector, and repair (LDAR) programs utilize optical gas cameras, drones, and satellite-based monitoring to identify and seal fugitive emissions from pipelines, valves, and storage tanks, achieving abatement potentials of up to 75% across the when fully deployed. Methane capture technologies, including vapor recovery units and enclosed flares, convert vented or flared gas into usable energy or pipeline-quality product, with companies like reporting over 60% reductions in methane intensity since 2016 through process improvements and facility redesigns. For landfills, gas collection systems with flares or engines can capture up to 80% of emissions by extracting for or injection into networks, as demonstrated in policy-driven implementations in countries like the and . In agriculture, which accounts for roughly 40% of human-caused methane from enteric fermentation in ruminants, additives such as 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) inhibit methanogenesis in cow digestive systems, reducing emissions by 20-30% per animal without affecting milk production or animal health, based on field trials approved for commercial use in the European Union since 2022. Anaerobic digesters applied to manure and wastewater treatment facilities process organic waste to produce biogas while capturing methane that would otherwise escape, with recovery efficiencies exceeding 90% in optimized systems. Coal mine ventilation air methane (VAM) destruction technologies, including thermal oxidizers, address dilute emissions from underground mines, though scalability remains limited by energy costs. These interventions are often economically viable, particularly in fossil fuels where captured methane offsets abatement expenses, but require accurate emission inventories to prioritize high-impact sites, as self-reported data from industry can underestimate leaks by factors of 2-3 according to independent satellite validations. Policy interventions emphasize regulatory mandates, financial incentives, and international commitments to enforce technological adoption. The U.S. Methane Emissions Reduction Program, established under the 2022 , imposes fees on excess methane emissions from oil and gas facilities starting in 2024, projected to drive an 80% reduction in sector emissions by tightening standards for new and existing sources. The European Union's Methane Strategy, updated in 2023, requires mandatory monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) for oil and gas operators, with phased bans on routine venting and flaring by 2027, supported by funding for abatement projects. Internationally, the 2021 Global Methane Pledge, endorsed by over 150 countries representing 80% of global oil and gas production, targets a 30% reduction from 2020 levels by 2030, yet as of 2025, only half of signatories have implemented detailed policies, with overall progress lagging due to weak enforcement and reliance on voluntary industry actions. Critics, including analyses from the , highlight that pledges often overlook non-fossil sources like , where regulatory hurdles slow additive deployment, and note discrepancies between pledged cuts and verified reductions, underscoring the need for third-party verification to counter potential over-optimism in government and industry projections.

Cost-Benefit Analyses of Reductions

Analyses of methane emission reductions frequently conclude that interventions in the sector yield favorable cost-benefit ratios, primarily because captured methane can be sold as , offsetting abatement expenses. The (IEA) estimates that USD 75 billion in global investments could reduce oil and gas methane emissions by up to 75% from 2020 levels by 2030, equivalent to 0.6 GtCO2e annually, with many measures achieving negative costs due to recovered gas value exceeding implementation expenses. Similarly, a synthesis of bottom-up engineering estimates and top-down econometric data identifies substantial low-cost or no--cost abatement potential in the U.S. oil and gas industry, potentially cutting emissions by over 40% without subsidies, as leak repairs enhance . Benefits in these assessments extend beyond climate mitigation to include air quality improvements, as methane reductions curb tropospheric formation, yielding gains estimated at thousands of dollars per abated in some models. The UNEP's Global Methane Assessment posits that 45-60% of anthropogenic emissions could be addressed at costs below USD 1,400 per of CH4 (2020 USD), with societal benefits—factoring in avoided warming, , and effects—reaching USD 4,300 per or more under high-end climate damage valuations. However, these valuations hinge on the of methane, which integrates uncertain parameters like equilibrium and discount rates from integrated assessment models, leading to benefit estimates spanning orders of magnitude. In and sectors, where emissions stem from biological processes, abatement costs rise significantly, often exceeding USD 1,000 per , with fewer opportunities for revenue recovery. Economic modeling for British Columbia's oil, gas, and agricultural sectors projects a 75% methane cut by 2030 via technology standards would reduce provincial GDP by just 0.0089%, but scaling globally involves trade-offs like higher from feed additives or herd reductions. Critics contend that short-term (GWP) metrics overstate methane's integrated relative to CO2, as its 12-year lifetime allows atmospheric rebound if reductions lapse, potentially diminishing long-run net benefits compared to durable CO2 controls. Policy-driven reductions, such as EPA rules or methane fees, introduce compliance burdens that may elevate prices without proportional empirical gains, given observational challenges in attributing changes to specific emission sources. A study on infrastructure finds that internalizing methane's social cost via pricing could cut U.S. emissions 73.8% at an annual net societal cost of USD 138 million, but this assumes leakage rates and damage functions contested by industry data showing lower empirical leaks than EPA inventories. Atmospheric removal technologies, proposed for residual emissions, face even steeper hurdles, with analysis indicating costs likely outweigh marginal warming reductions given current scalability limits. Overall, while leak repairs demonstrate clear private economic incentives, public policy expansions' net societal value remains debated, contingent on resolving uncertainties in emission inventories, GWP formulations, and damage extrapolations.

Debates on Attribution and Alarmism

The attribution of atmospheric methane concentrations to specific sources remains contested, with estimates varying based on methodologies. Top-down atmospheric inversions often suggest higher anthropogenic contributions from operations, estimating 20-30% of total emissions, while bottom-up inventories emphasize and waste at around 40-50%. Critics, including analyses from independent researchers, argue that mainstream inventories underestimate natural biogenic sources, such as expanding tropical wetlands responsive to recent trends rather than solely anthropogenic drivers, potentially inflating attribution by 10-20%. Isotopic studies using δ¹³C ratios aim to differentiate (depleted) from biogenic methane, but overlaps and measurement uncertainties limit definitive partitioning, particularly amid rising global emissions since 2007. Alarmism surrounding methane's climate role often centers on its high short-term (GWP of ~84 over 20 years) and fears of amplifying feedbacks, such as thaw releasing 50-100 Gt of by 2100. However, empirical field measurements from sites show methane effluxes from thawing soils averaging 10-50 mg CH₄ m⁻² day⁻¹, far below model projections of widespread destabilization, with oxidation in aerobic layers mitigating much of the release. Marine clathrate deposits, hyped as potential "methane bombs," exhibit stability under current warming, with dissociation thresholds exceeding observed rises by 5-10°C, as confirmed by seismic and coring data. Sources promoting urgent methane cuts, such as environmental advocacy groups, frequently overlook these observational constraints, prioritizing narratives over reconciled budgets where natural sinks like hydroxyl radicals absorb ~90% of emissions annually. Skeptics of alarmist framing contend that emphasizing methane diverts resources from long-term CO₂ , given its 9-12 year lifetime; stabilizing concentrations might avert 0.2-0.3°C of warming by 2050 but yields negligible benefits without concurrent CO₂ reductions. Empirical trends since 1850 attribute ~0.5°C of observed warming to all non-CO₂ gases including methane, yet models integrating methane forcings have overestimated near-term temperature responses by factors of 1.5-2 compared to and surface records. Institutions with documented biases, such as UNEP, amplify calls for immediate interventions despite cost-benefit analyses showing methane abatement at $500-1000 per tCO₂e often exceeding marginal damages. This perspective underscores causal realism: methane's transient potency warrants targeted leak reductions in controllable sectors like oil and gas, but hyperbolic scenarios risk policy distortions favoring symbolic over substantive strategies.

Safety, Health, and Environmental Hazards

Flammability and Explosion Risks

Methane is extremely , with a lower limit (LEL) of 5.0% by volume in air and an upper limit (UEL) of 15.0% by volume, defining the concentration range where ignition can propagate a and potentially lead to in confined spaces. Beyond the UEL, mixtures become too fuel-rich to sustain , while below the LEL, insufficient fuel prevents ignition. The is approximately 537°C (1,000°F), allowing under elevated temperatures without an external spark. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 704 hazard rating assigns methane a flammability score of 4, indicating severe hazard due to its wide flammable range and low ignition energy, which can be as minimal as 0.28 mJ under optimal conditions. Vapor-air mixtures above the flash point are explosive, particularly in enclosed environments where pressure buildup can rupture containers or structures if heated. In industrial settings like natural gas processing, pipelines, and coal mines—where methane is known as "firedamp"—accumulation poses acute risks, exacerbated by its lighter-than-air properties that allow it to migrate upward and collect at ceilings. Explosion hazards are amplified in scenarios involving leaks into poorly ventilated areas, such as sewers, landfills, or storage facilities, where methane can displace oxygen and form ignitable clouds triggered by , open flames, or electrical sparks. Safety data sheets emphasize that pressurized methane containers may rupture or explode upon exposure to fire, releasing additional fuel to intensify blasts. Historical incidents underscore these dangers; for instance, the 1984 in the UK resulted from a methane ignition in a waterworks valve house, killing 16 people due to accumulation. Similarly, the 1902 Fraterville Mine explosion in , triggered by a methane-coal dust ignition, claimed 184 lives, highlighting risks in underground without adequate ventilation or monitoring. Mitigation relies on continuous monitoring with combustible gas detectors calibrated to 50% LEL alarms, explosion-proof equipment per OSHA standards, and ventilation to maintain concentrations below 1% in high-risk zones, though rapid dispersion and odorless nature demand rigorous protocols to avert deflagrations escalating to detonations.

Toxicity and Human Health Effects

Methane (CH₄) is classified as a simple asphyxiant rather than a chemically toxic substance, exerting its primary health effects through the physical displacement of oxygen in enclosed or confined spaces, leading to hypoxia when concentrations exceed approximately 50% by volume in air. Biologically inert, methane does not react with biological tissues or produce metabolites that cause direct cellular damage, poisoning, or carcinogenesis in humans. Unlike reactive gases such as carbon monoxide, its hazards arise solely from reducing the partial pressure of oxygen below the threshold needed for respiration, typically resulting in symptoms only at levels that render the atmosphere irrespirable. Acute exposure to high methane concentrations impairs cognitive and motor functions progressively as oxygen levels drop: initial signs include rapid breathing, elevated , , , and impaired vision, particularly in dim light, followed by clumsiness, loss of coordination, , and potentially fatal asphyxiation if oxygen falls below 10-15%. Documented cases illustrate these risks, such as workers entering manure pits where methane accumulation led to rapid loss of consciousness and due to oxygen displacement below 19.5%, with foam exuding from the mouth and as a postmortem indicator of acute hypoxia. Similarly, incidents in sewers or manholes have resulted in multiple fatalities from sudden collapse and inability to escape, underscoring the gas's odorless, colorless nature that precludes sensory detection without . Regulatory bodies recognize methane's asphyxiant properties without establishing specific permissible exposure limits (PELs) for toxicity, as effects are concentration-dependent on ambient oxygen rather than cumulative dose; the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) recommends a (TLV) of 1,000 ppm as an 8-hour time-weighted average solely to signal potential oxygen deficiency hazards, while OSHA mandates general ventilation and monitoring to maintain oxygen above 19.5%. No evidence supports chronic effects from low-level exposures, such as reproductive or neurological deterioration directly attributable to methane, though survivors of severe hypoxic episodes may experience persistent cardiovascular or respiratory sequelae from oxygen deprivation. Inhalation of pure methane has occasionally triggered in rare survivals, but this stems from secondary during rather than inherent pneumotoxicity. Overall, human risks are mitigated through like gas detectors and exclusion zones in high-risk environments, with no population-level impacts observed from ambient concentrations, which remain far below hazardous thresholds.

Leak Detection and Response Protocols

Methane leak detection protocols in infrastructure rely on a combination of traditional and advanced technologies to identify releases from pipelines, storage facilities, and processing equipment. Common methods include audio, visual, and olfactory (AVO) surveys, where operators listen for hissing sounds, observe disturbances or dying , and detect the characteristic rotten-egg odorant added to . Instrument-based approaches predominate for precision, such as optical gas imaging (OGI) cameras that visualize methane plumes via absorption, sensors measuring light absorption at methane's specific wavelengths, and catalytic sensors using heated filaments to detect combustible gases. Emerging technologies like (light detection and ranging) enable aerial surveys to map plumes over large areas, while machine learning-integrated systems, such as the Smart Methane Emission Detection System (SLED), autonomously quantify emissions using sensors and AI algorithms. Regulatory frameworks mandate regular leak surveys and advanced detection integration. The U.S. and Hazardous Materials Administration (PHMSA) requires operators to classify leaks as Grade 1 (immediate , e.g., risk or potential), Grade 2 (non-immediate but actionable ), or Grade 3 (non-hazardous), with prioritized repairs: Grade 1 leaks addressed immediately, Grade 2 within set timelines, and enhanced patrolling using tools like OGI or equivalent instruments. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces and repair (LDAR) programs under New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), primarily using EPA Reference Method 21 for component monitoring with portable analyzers calibrated to detect methane concentrations above 10,000 ppm. OSHA standards focus on worker , setting permissible exposure limits (PEL) for methane at 1,000 ppm over 8 hours and immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) levels at 1.4% volume, requiring continuous monitoring in confined spaces and during investigations. Response protocols prioritize public safety and emission mitigation upon detection. Operators must immediately isolate the leak by shutting valves, ventilate areas to disperse gas, and evacuate personnel within defined radii—e.g., 300-1,000 feet for small leaks up to several miles for ruptures, per PHMSA guidelines—while warning nearby residents via public alerts. Individuals encountering suspected leaks are instructed to avoid ignition sources, evacuate on foot without operating appliances or vehicles, and notify emergency services (e.g., 911) from a safe distance, refraining from leak localization attempts. Post-response, repairs involve excavation, component replacement, and pressure testing, with PHMSA mandating automatic shut-off valves on new in high-consequence areas to limit release volumes. Empirical studies demonstrate variable effectiveness of these protocols. Field surveys across 67 oil and gas sites found a 0.39% rate among 84,000 components using standard LDAR, while repeated OGI surveys reduced total emissions by 44%, including 22% from sources, over multi-year cycles. Controlled experiments showed repair interventions cutting leak counts by approximately 50% at treated sites compared to controls, though persistent super-emitters highlight limitations in intermittent surveys versus continuous monitoring. Continuous systems achieve 90% probability of detection for leaks as low as 3-30 kg CH4/hour, but integration challenges and false positives remain, underscoring the need for technology validation against ground-truth data.

Historical Context

Discovery and Early Characterization

The scientific discovery of methane is credited to Italian , who in November 1776 collected and isolated the gas from bubbles rising in the muddy sediments of near Angera, . Motivated by reports of flammable "air" in marshes from fellow scientist Father Carlo Barletti, Volta distinguished this gas from previously known combustibles like , noting its production via anaerobic organic decay when sediments were disturbed. He termed it "inflammable native air of the marshes" (aria infiammabile nativa delle paludi) and published initial findings in 1777, establishing it as a distinct substance generated by in oxygen-poor environments. Volta's early characterization emphasized its physical and chemical properties through controlled experiments. The gas was found to be lighter than atmospheric air, non-soluble in , and capable of sustained with a pale blue, non-luminous flame that produced no soot or strong odor. When mixed with air or oxygen, it formed explosive mixtures ignited by electric sparks, though less violently than ; revealed products including (CO₂) and , indicating a carbon- composition without or other elements common in air. These observations, detailed in Volta's memoir to the Royal Society, confirmed methane's role in natural phenomena like ignitions and differentiated it from "fixed air" (CO₂) or "inflammable air" (). By the early , further characterization linked methane to industrial contexts, particularly as "" in mines, where British identified it as the primary explosive component in 1813–1815 investigations prompted by mining disasters. Davy termed it "carburetted " based on its derivation from (rich in s) and determined flammability limits—explosive between 5% and 15% in air—informing his 1815 design, which used wire gauze to dissipate heat and prevent ignition. These studies solidified methane's identity as the simplest saturated (CH₄), with empirical ratios yielding one volume of CO₂ per volume of gas, aligning with atomic weights emerging from Dalton's . Early sources consistently emphasized its biogenic origins from decaying vegetation, though abiotic formation in geological settings was not yet differentiated.

Industrial and Scientific Milestones

The extraction of methane as a component of marked early industrial milestones in the , beginning with the of the first commercial well in , by William Aaron Hart in 1821, which reached 27 feet deep and supplied gas for local illumination. This success prompted the establishment of the Fredonia Gas Light Company in 1825, the inaugural company dedicated to distribution for lighting and heating in the United States. By the 1860s, production expanded in the Appalachian region, fueling industrial processes such as glassmaking and iron production, with annual output reaching approximately 20 million cubic meters by 1880. Advancements in infrastructure enabled broader utilization; in 1891, the first long-distance , spanning 120 miles from gas fields in to , , facilitated urban distribution and underscored methane's viability as a piped . The early saw regulatory and technological progress, including the U.S. Natural Gas Act of 1938, which promoted interstate pipelines and expanded access, culminating in over 1.6 million kilometers of pipelines by mid-century. Scientifically, methane's atmospheric presence was quantified starting in through ground-based measurements, revealing concentrations around 1.2 parts per million and initiating research into its oxidative chemistry. Post-World War II innovations included the commercialization of (LNG), with the Methane Pioneer ship delivering the first overseas cargo from , to , , in 1959, transporting 5,000 cubic meters and proving cryogenic storage at -162°C for global trade. In , the steam-methane reforming process, refined in and scaled industrially by the , became the dominant method for , reacting methane with steam over nickel catalysts to yield (CO + H₂) at efficiencies exceeding 70%. These developments positioned methane as a feedstock for ammonia synthesis via the Haber-Bosch process and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis for liquid fuels, with global production surpassing 2 trillion cubic meters annually by the . Further scientific milestones involved microbial ; in the 1930s, Hungarian researchers isolated methane-producing from sediments, elucidating anaerobic pathways involving coenzyme M and nickel-dependent enzymes, which by the were linked to 60-70% of natural from wetlands and ruminants. Atmospheric advanced with detection in the 1990s, enabling global mapping of sources, while catalytic activation studies in the demonstrated of methane to using catalysts at selective yields up to 70%, paving the way for direct conversion technologies. By the 2000s, isotopic analysis confirmed anthropogenic contributions dominating emissions, with extraction accounting for 30-40% of totals.

References

  1. https://www.jpl.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/news/cassini-explores-a-methane-sea-on-titan/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.