Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
People's Liberation Army
View on Wikipedia
| Chinese People's Liberation Army | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simplified Chinese | 中国人民解放军 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Traditional Chinese | 中國人民解放軍 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Literal meaning | "China People Liberation Army" | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| People's Liberation Army |
|---|
| Executive departments |
| Staff |
| Services |
| Arms |
| Domestic troops |
| Special operations forces |
| Military districts |
| History of the Chinese military |
| Military ranks of China |
|
|
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) is the military of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People's Republic of China (PRC). It consists of four services—Ground Force, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force—and four arms—Aerospace Force, Cyberspace Force, Information Support Force, and Joint Logistics Support Force. It is led by the Central Military Commission (CMC) with its chairman as commander-in-chief.
The PLA can trace its origins during the Republican era to the left-wing units of the National Revolutionary Army (NRA) of the Kuomintang (KMT), when they broke away in 1927 in an uprising against the nationalist government as the Chinese Red Army before being reintegrated into the NRA as units of New Fourth Army and Eighth Route Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War. The two NRA communist units were reconstituted as the PLA in 1947. Since 1949, the PLA has used nine different military strategies, which it calls "strategic guidelines". The most important came in 1956, 1980, and 1993. Politically, the PLA and the paramilitary People's Armed Police (PAP) have the largest delegation in the National People's Congress (NPC); the joint delegation currently has 281 deputies—over 9% of the total—all of whom are CCP members.
The PLA is not a traditional nation-state military. It is a part, and the armed wing, of the CCP and controlled by the party, not by the state. The PLA's primary mission is the defense of the party and its interests. The PLA is the guarantor of the party's survival and rule, and the party prioritizes maintaining control and the loyalty of the PLA. According to Chinese law, the party has leadership over the armed forces and the CMC exercises supreme military command; the party and state CMCs are practically a single body by membership. Since 1989, the CCP general secretary has also been the CMC Chairman; this grants significant political power as the only member of the Politburo Standing Committee with direct responsibilities for the armed forces. The Ministry of National Defense has no command authority; it is the PLA's interface with state and foreign entities and insulates the PLA from external influence.
Today, the majority of military units around the country are assigned to one of five theatre commands by geographical location. The PLA is the world's largest military force (not including paramilitary or reserve forces) and has the second largest defence budget in the world. China's military expenditure was US$314 billion in 2024, accounting for 12 percent of the world's defence expenditures. It is also one of the fastest modernizing militaries in the world, and has been termed as a potential military superpower, with significant regional defence and rising global power projection capabilities.[6][2]
In addition to wartime arrangements, the PLA is also involved in the peacetime operations of other components of the armed forces. This is particularly visible in maritime territorial disputes where the navy is heavily involved in the planning, coordination and execution of operations by the PAP's China Coast Guard.
Mission
[edit]The PLA's primary mission is the defense of the CCP and its interests.[7] It is the guarantor of the party's survival and rule,[7][8] and the party prioritizes maintaining control and the loyalty of the PLA.[8]
In 2004, paramount leader Hu Jintao stated the mission of the PLA as:[9]
- Consolidate the rule of the CCP
- Ensure sovereignty, territorial integrity, internal security and national development of the People's Republic of China
- Safeguard the country's interests
- Help maintain world peace
China describes its military posture as active defense, defined in a 2015 state white paper as "We will not attack unless we are attacked, but we will surely counterattack if attacked."[10]: 41
History
[edit]Early history
[edit]The CCP founded its military wing on 1 August 1927 during the Nanchang uprising, beginning the Chinese Civil War. Communist elements of the National Revolutionary Army rebelled under the leadership of Zhu De, He Long, Ye Jianying, Zhou Enlai, and other leftist elements of the Kuomintang (KMT) after the Shanghai massacre in 1927.[11] They were then known as the Chinese Workers' and Peasants' Red Army, or simply the Red Army.[12] In 1934 and 1935, the Red Army survived several campaigns led against it by Chiang Kai-Shek's Kuomintang and engaged in the Long March.[13]
During the Second Sino-Japanese War from 1937 to 1945, the CCP's military forces were nominally integrated into the National Revolutionary Army of the Republic of China, forming two main units, the Eighth Route Army and the New Fourth Army.[14] During this time, these two military groups primarily employed guerrilla tactics, generally avoiding large-scale battles with the Japanese, and at the same time consolidating by recruiting KMT troops and paramilitary forces behind Japanese lines into their forces.[15]
After the Japanese surrender in 1945, the CCP continued to use the National Revolutionary Army unit structures, until the decision was made in February 1947 to merge the Eighth Route Army and New Fourth Army.[14] On October 10, 1947, the "Manifesto of the Chinese People's Liberation Army" was published, renaming the new million-strong force the People's Liberation Army (PLA).[16][17][18][19] The reorganization was completed by late 1948. The PLA eventually won the Chinese Civil War, establishing the People's Republic of China in 1949.[20]
Establishment of the People's Republic of China
[edit]


After the establishment of the PRC, the PLA underwent a drastic reorganization, with the establishment of the Air Force leadership structure in November 1949, followed by the Navy leadership structure the following April.[21][22] In 1950, the leadership structures of the artillery, armored troops, air defence troops, public security forces, and worker–soldier militias were also established. The chemical warfare defence forces, the railroad forces, the communications forces, and the strategic forces, as well as other separate forces (such as engineering and construction, and logistics and medical services), were established later on.
In this early period, the People's Liberation Army overwhelmingly consisted of peasants.[23] Its treatment of soldiers and officers was egalitarian[23] and formal ranks were not adopted until 1955.[24] As a result of its egalitarian organization, the early PLA overturned strict traditional hierarchies that governed the lives of peasants.[23] As sociologist Alessandro Russo summarizes, the peasant composition of the PLA hierarchy was a radical break with Chinese societal norms and "overturned the strict traditional hierarchies in unprecedented forms of egalitarianism[.]"[23] During the 1950s, the PLA with Soviet assistance began to transform itself from a peasant army into a modern one.[25]
In the PRC's early years, the PLA was a dominant foreign policy institution in the country.[26]: 17 Since 1949, China has used nine different military strategies, which the PLA calls "strategic guidelines". The most important came in 1956, 1980, and 1993.[27] Part of this process was the reorganization that created thirteen military regions in 1955.[citation needed]
In November 1950, some units of the PLA under the name of the People's Volunteer Army intervened in the Korean War as United Nations forces under General Douglas MacArthur approached the Yalu River.[28] Under the weight of this offensive, Chinese forces drove MacArthur's forces out of North Korea and captured Seoul, but were subsequently pushed back south of Pyongyang north of the 38th Parallel.[28] The war also catalyzed the rapid modernization of the PLAAF.[29]
In 1962, the PLA Ground Force also fought India in the Sino-Indian War.[30][31] In a series of border clashes in 1967 with Indian troops, the PLA suffered heavy numerical and tactical losses.[32][33][34]
Before the Cultural Revolution, military region commanders tended to remain in their posts for long periods. The longest-serving military region commanders were Xu Shiyou in the Nanjing Military Region (1954–74), Yang Dezhi in the Jinan Military Region (1958–74), Chen Xilian in the Shenyang Military Region (1959–73), and Han Xianchu in the Fuzhou Military Region (1960–74).[35] In the early days of the Cultural Revolution, the PLA abandoned the use of the military ranks that it had adopted in 1955.[24] The Central Military Commission had deemed that ranks were an expression of bourgeois right and hierarchy which led to individualist attitudes, inequality, and a sense of disunity.[36]: 165
The establishment of a professional military force equipped with modern weapons and doctrine was the last of the Four Modernizations announced by Zhou Enlai and supported by Deng Xiaoping.[37][38] In keeping with Deng's mandate to reform, the PLA has demobilized millions of men and women since 1978 and has introduced modern methods in such areas as recruitment and manpower, strategy, and education and training.[39] In 1979, the PLA fought Vietnam over a border skirmish in the Sino-Vietnamese War where both sides claimed victory.[40] However, western analysts generally agree that Vietnam handily outperformed the PLA.[35]
During the Sino-Soviet split, strained relations between China and the Soviet Union resulted in bloody border clashes and mutual backing of each other's adversaries.[41] China and Afghanistan had neutral relations with each other during the King's rule.[42] When the pro-Soviet Afghan Communists seized power in Afghanistan in 1978, relations between China and the Afghan communists quickly turned hostile.[43] The Afghan pro-Soviet communists supported China's enemies in Vietnam and blamed China for supporting Afghan anticommunist militants.[43] China responded to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan by supporting the Afghan mujahidin and ramping up their military presence near Afghanistan in Xinjiang.[43] China acquired military equipment from the United States to defend itself from Soviet attacks.[44]
The PLA Ground Force trained and supported the Afghan Mujahideen during the Soviet-Afghan War, moving its training camps for the mujahideen from Pakistan into China itself.[45] Hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of anti-aircraft missiles, rocket launchers, and machine guns were given to the Mujahideen by the Chinese.[46] Chinese military advisors and army troops were also present with the Mujahideen during training.[44]
Since 1980
[edit]In 1981, the PLA conducted its largest military exercise in North China since the founding of the People's Republic.[27][47]
In the late 1980s, the central government had increasing expenditures and limited revenue.[48]: 43 The central government encouraged its agencies and encouraged local governments to expand their services and pursue revenues.[48]: 43 The PLA established businesses including hotels and restaurants.[48]: 43 The PLA gained more autonomy and permission to engage in commercial activities in exchange for a reduced role in political affairs and limited budgets;[49] the military was downsized to free resources for economic development.[50] The lack of oversight, ineffective self-regulation, and Jiang Zemin's and Hu Jintao's lack of close personal ties to the PLA[49] led to systemic corruption that persisted through the late-2010s.[51] Jiang's attempt to divest the PLA of its commercial interests was only partially successful, as many were still run by close associates of PLA officers.[49] Corruption lowered readiness and proficiency,[52] was a barrier to modernization and professionalization,[53] and eroded party control.[8] The 2010s anti-corruption campaigns and military reforms under Xi Jinping from the early-2010s were in part executed to address these problems.[54][55]
Following the PLA's suppression of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, ideological correctness was temporarily revived as the dominant theme in Chinese military affairs.[56] Reform and modernization have today resumed their position as the PLA's primary objectives, although the armed forces' political loyalty to the CCP has remained a leading concern.[57][58]
Beginning in the 1980s, the PLA tried to transform itself from a land-based power centered on a vast ground force to a smaller, more mobile, high-tech one capable of mounting operations beyond its borders.[27] The motivation for this was that a massive land invasion by Russia was no longer seen as a major threat, and the new threats to China are seen to be a declaration of independence by Taiwan, possibly with assistance from the United States, or a confrontation over the Spratly Islands.[59]
In 1985, under the leadership of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and the CMC, the PLA changed from being constantly prepared to "hit early, strike hard, and to fight a nuclear war" to developing the military in an era of peace.[27] The PLA reoriented itself to modernization, improving its fighting ability, and becoming a world-class force. Deng Xiaoping stressed that the PLA needed to focus more on quality rather than on quantity.[59]
The decision of the Chinese government in 1985 to reduce the size of the military by one million was completed by 1987. Staffing in military leadership was cut by about 50 percent. During the Ninth Five Year Plan (1996–2000) the PLA was reduced by a further 500,000. The PLA had also been expected to be reduced by another 200,000 by 2005. The PLA has focused on increasing mechanization and informatization to be able to fight a high-intensity war.[59]
Former CMC chairman Jiang in 1990 called on the military to "meet political standards, be militarily competent, have a good working style, adhere strictly to discipline, and provide vigorous logistic support" (Chinese: 政治合格、军事过硬、作风优良、纪律严明、保障有力; pinyin: zhèngzhì hégé, jūnshì guòyìng, zuòfēng yōuliáng, jìlǜ yánmíng, bǎozhàng yǒulì).[60] The 1991 Gulf War provided the Chinese leadership with a stark realization that the PLA was an oversized, almost-obsolete force.[61][62] The USA's sending of two aircraft carrier groups to the vicinity of Taiwan during the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis prompted Jiang to order a ten-year PLA modernization program.[63]

The possibility of a militarized Japan has also been a continuous concern to the Chinese leadership since the late 1990s.[64] In addition, China's military leadership has been reacting to and learning from the successes and failures of the United States Armed Forces during the Kosovo War,[65] the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan,[66] the 2003 invasion of Iraq,[67] and the Iraqi insurgency.[67] All these lessons inspired China to transform the PLA from a military based on quantity to one based on quality. Chairman Jiang Zemin officially made a "revolution in military affairs" (RMA) part of the official national military strategy in 1993 to modernize the Chinese armed forces.[68]
A goal of the RMA is to transform the PLA into a force capable of winning what it calls "local wars under high-tech conditions" rather than a massive, numbers-dominated ground-type war.[68] Chinese military planners call for short decisive campaigns, limited in both their geographic scope and their political goals. In contrast to the past, more attention is given to reconnaissance, mobility, and deep reach. This new vision has shifted resources towards the navy and air force. The PLA is also actively preparing for space warfare and cyber-warfare.[69][70][71]
In 2002, the PLA began holding military exercises with militaries from other countries.[72]: 242 From 2018 to 2023, more than half of these exercises have focused on military training other than war, generally antipiracy, or antiterrorism exercises involving combatting non-state actors.[72]: 242 In 2009, the PLA held its first military exercise in Africa, a humanitarian and medical training practice conducted in Gabon.[72]: 242
For the past 10 to 20 years, the PLA has acquired some advanced weapons systems from Russia, including Sovremenny class destroyers,[73] Sukhoi Su-27[74] and Kilo-class diesel-electric submarines.[75] It has also started to produce several new classes of destroyers and frigates including the Type 052D class guided-missile destroyer.[76][77] In addition, the PLAAF has designed its very own Chengdu J-10 fighter aircraft[78] and a new stealth fighter, the Chengdu J-20.[79] The PLA launched the new Jin class nuclear submarines on 3 December 2004 capable of launching nuclear warheads that could strike targets across the Pacific Ocean[80] and have three aircraft carriers, with the latest, the Fujian, launched in 2022.[81][82][83]
From 2014 to 2015, the PLA deployed 524 medical staff on a rotational basis to combat the Ebola virus outbreak in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Guinea-Bissau.[72]: 245 As of 2023, this was the PLA's largest medical assistance mission in another country.[72]: 245
China re-organized its military from 2015 to 2016. In 2015, the PLA formed new units including the PLA Ground Force, the PLA Rocket Force, and the PLA Strategic Support Force.[84] In 2016, the CMC replaced the four traditional military departments with a number of new bodies.[85]: 288–289 China replaced its system of seven military regions with newly established Theater Commands: Northern, Southern, Western, Eastern, and Central.[85]: 289 In the prior system, operations were segmented by military branch and region.[85]: 289 In contrast, each Theater Command is intended to function as a unified entity with joint operations across different military branches.[85]: 289
The PLA on 1 August 2017 marked its 90th anniversary.[86] Before the big anniversary it mounted its biggest parade yet and the first outside of Beijing, held in the Zhurihe Training Base in the Northern Theater Command (within the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region).[87]
In December 2023, Reuters reported a military leadership purge after high-ranking generals were ousted from the National People's Congress.[88] Prior to 2017, over sixty generals were investigated and sacked.[89]
Overseas deployments and peacekeeping operations
[edit]In addition to its Support Base in Djibouti, the PLA operates a base in Tajikistan and a listening station in Cuba.[90][91] The Espacio Lejano Station in Argentina is operated by a PLA unit.[92][93] The PLAN has also undertaken rotational deployments of its warships at the Ream Naval Base in Cambodia.[94][95]
The People's Republic of China has sent the PLA to various hotspots as part of China's role as a prominent member of the United Nations.[96] Such units usually include engineers and logistical units and members of the paramilitary People's Armed Police and have been deployed as part of peacekeeping operations in Lebanon,[97][98] the Republic of the Congo,[97] Sudan,[99] Ivory Coast,[100] Haiti,[101][102] and more recently, Mali and South Sudan.[97][103]
Engagements
[edit]- 1927–1950: Chinese Civil War[104]
- 1937–1945: Second Sino-Japanese War[105]
- 1949: Yangtze incident against British warships on the Yangtze River[106]
- 1949: Incorporation of Xinjiang into the People's Republic of China[107]
- 1950: Annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China[108]
- 1950–1953: Korean War under the banner of the Chinese People's Volunteer Army[109]
- 1954–1955: First Taiwan Strait Crisis[110]
- 1955–1970: Vietnam War[111]
- 1958: Second Taiwan Strait Crisis at Quemoy and Matsu[112]
- 1962: Sino-Indian War[113]
- 1967: Border skirmishes with India[32]
- 1969: Sino-Soviet border conflict[114]
- 1974: Battle of the Paracel Islands with South Vietnam[115]
- 1979: Sino-Vietnamese War[116]
- 1979–1990: Sino-Vietnamese conflicts[117]
- 1988: Johnson South Reef Skirmish with Vietnam[118]
- 1989: Enforcement of martial law in Beijing during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre[119]
- 1990: Barin uprising[120]
- 1995–1996: Third Taiwan Strait Crisis[121]
- 2007–present: UNIFIL peacekeeping operations in Lebanon[97]
- 2009–present: Anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden[122]
- 2014: Search and rescue efforts for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370[123]
- 2014: UN peacekeeping operations in Mali[124]
- 2015: UNMISS peacekeeping operations in South Sudan[125]
- 2020–2021: China–India skirmishes[126]
As of at least early 2024, China has not fought a war since 1979 and has only fought relatively minor conflicts since.[10]: 72
Organization
[edit]

The PLA is a component of the armed forces of China, which also includes the PAP, the reserves, and the militia.[127] The armed forces are controlled by the CCP under the doctrine of "the Party commands the gun".[8] The PLA and the PAP have the largest delegation in the National People's Congress (NPC), which are elected by servicemember election committees of top-level military subdivisions, including the PLA's theater commands and service branches.[128] At the 14th National People's Congress; the joint delegation has 281 deputies—over 9% of the total—all of whom are CCP members.[129]
Central Military Commission
[edit]The PLA is governed by the Central Military Commission (CMC); under the arrangement of "one institution with two names", there exists a state CMC and a Party CMC, although both commissions have identical personnel, organization and function, and effectively work as a single body.[130] The only difference in membership between the two occurs for a few months every five years, during the period between a Party National Congress, when Party CMC membership changes, and the next ensuing National People's Congress, when the state CMC changes.[131]
The CMC is composed of a chairman, vice chairpersons and regular members. The chairman of the CMC is the commander-in-chief of the PLA, with the post generally held by the paramount leader of China; since 1989, the post has generally been held together with the CCP general secretary.[8][130][132] Unlike in other countries, the Ministry of National Defense and its Minister do not have command authority, largely acting as diplomatic liaisons of the CMC, insulating the PLA from external influence.[133] However, except for the current incumbent, Admiral Dong Jun, the Minister has always been a member of the CMC.[130]
- Chairman
- Xi Jinping (also General Secretary, President and Commander-in-chief of Joint Battle Command)
- Vice Chairmen
- General Zhang Youxia
- Members
- Chief of the Joint Staff Department (JSD) – General Liu Zhenli
- Secretary of the Commission for Discipline Inspection – General Zhang Shengmin
Previously, the PLA was governed by four general departments; the General Political, the General Logistics, the General Armament, and the General Staff Departments. These were abolished in 2016 under the military reforms undertaken by Xi Jinping, replaced with 15 new functional departments directly reporting to the CMC:[134]
- General Office
- Joint Staff Department
- Political Work Department
- Logistic Support Department
- Equipment Development Department
- Training and Administration Department
- National Defense Mobilization Department
- Discipline Inspection Commission
- Politics and Legal Affairs Commission
- Science and Technology Commission
- Office for Strategic Planning
- Office for Reform and Organizational Structure
- Office for International Military Cooperation
- Audit Office
- Agency for Offices Administration
Included among the 15 departments are three commissions. The CMC Discipline Inspection Commission is charged with rooting out corruption.
Political leadership
[edit]The CCP maintains absolute control over the PLA.[135] It requires the PLA to undergo political education, instilling CCP ideology in its members.[136] Additionally, China maintains a political commissar system.[137] Regiment-level and higher units maintain CCP committees and political commissars (Chinese: 政治委员 or 政委).[137][138] Additionally, battalion-level and company-level units respectively maintain political directors and political instructors.[139] The political workers are officially equal to commanders in status.[136] The political workers are officially responsible for the implementation of party committee decisions, instilling and maintaining party discipline, providing political education, and working with other components of the political work system.[139]
As a rule, the political worker serves as the party committee secretary while the commander serves as the deputy secretary.[139] Key decisions in the PLA are generally made in the CCP committees throughout the military.[136] Due to the CCP's absolute leadership, non-CCP political parties and groups and organizations except the Communist Youth League of China are not allowed to establish organizations or have members in the PLA. Additionally, only the CCP is allowed to appoint the leading cadres at all levels of the PLA.[138]
Grades
[edit]Grades determine the command hierarchy from the CMC to the platoon level. Entities command lower-graded entities, and coordinate with like-graded entities.[140] An organization's grade impacts the resources allocated to it.[141]: 89 Since 1988, all organizations, billets, and officers in the PLA have a grade.[142]
Civil–military relations within the wider state bureaucracy is also influenced by grades. The grading systems used by the armed forces and the government are parallel, making it easier for military entities to identify the civilian entities they should coordinate with.[140]
An officer's authority, eligibility for billets, pay, and retirement age is determined by grade.[143][140] Career progression includes lateral transfers between billets of the same grade, but which are not considered promotions.[144][145] An officer retiring to the civil service has their grade translated to the civil grade system;[140] their grade continues to progress and draw retirement benefits through the civil system rather than the armed forces.[146]
Historically, an officer's grade — or position (Chinese: 职务等级; pinyin: zhiwu dengji[147]) — was more important than their rank (Chinese: 军衔; pinyin: junxian[147]).[140] Historically, time-in-grade and time-in-rank requirements[148] and promotions were not synchronized;[144] multiple ranks were present in each grade[149] with all having the same authority.[146] Rank was mainly a visual aid to roughly determine relative position when interacting with Chinese and foreign personnel.[140] PLA etiquette preferred addressing personnel by position rather than by rank.[150] Reforms to a more rank-centric system began in 2021.[147] In 2023, a revised grade structure associated one rank per grade, with some ranks spanning multiple grades.[151]
Operational control
[edit]
Operational control of combat units is divided between the service headquarters and domestic geographically based theatre commands.
Theatre commands are multi-service ("joint") organizations that are broadly responsible for strategy, plans, tactics, and policy specific to their assigned area of responsibility. In wartime, they will likely have full control of subordinate units; in peacetime, units also report to their service headquarters.[153] Force-building is the responsibility of the services and the CMC.[154] The five theatre commands, in order of stated significance are:[155]
- Eastern Theater Command
- Southern Theater Command
- Western Theater Command
- Northern Theater Command
- Central Theater Command
The service headquarters retain operational control in some areas within China and outside of China. For example, army headquarters controls or is responsible for the Beijing Garrison, the Tibet Military District, the Xinjiang Military District,[156] and border and coastal defences. The counterpiracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden are controlled by navy headquarters.[157] The JSD nominally controls operations beyond China's periphery,[158] but in practice this seems to apply only to army operations.[159]
Services and theater commands have the same grade. The overlap of areas or units of responsibility may create disputes requiring CMC arbitration.[159]
As part of the 2015 reforms, military regions were replaced by theatre commands in 2016.[160] Military regions were − uinlike the theatre commands − army-centric[161] peacetime administrative organizations,[162] and joint wartime commands were created on-demand by the army-dominated General Staff Department.[162]
Organization table
[edit]Academic institutions
[edit]There are two academic institutions directly subordinate to the CMC, the National Defense University and the National University of Defense Technology, and they are considered the two top military education institutions in China. There are also 35 institutions affiliated to the PLA's branches and arms, and 7 institutions affiliated to the People's Armed Police.[164]
People's Armed Forces Department
[edit]Service branches
[edit]The PLA consists of four services (Ground Force, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force) and four arms (Aerospace Force, Cyberspace Force, Information Support Force, and Joint Logistics Support Force).[165]
Services
[edit]The PLA maintains four services (Chinese: 军种; pinyin: jūnzhǒng): the Ground Force, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Rocket Force. Following the 200,000 and 300,000 personnel reduction announced in 2003 and 2005 respectively, the total strength of the PLA has been reduced from 2.5 million to around 2 million.[166] The reductions came mainly from non-combat ground forces, which would allow more funds to be diverted to naval, air, and strategic missile forces. This shows China's shift from ground force prioritization to emphasizing air and naval power with high-tech equipment for offensive roles over disputed territories, particularly in the South China Sea.[167]
Ground Force
[edit]
The PLA Ground Force (PLAGF) is the largest of the PLA's five services with 960,000 active duty personnel, approximately half of the PLA's total manpower of around 2 million personnel.[2] The PLAGF is organized into twelve active duty group armies sequentially numbered from the 71st Group Army to the 83rd Group Army which are distributed to each of the PRC's five theatre commands, receiving two to three group armies per command. In wartime, numerous PLAGF reserve and paramilitary units may be mobilized to augment these active group armies. The PLAGF reserve component comprises approximately 510,000 personnel divided into thirty infantry and twelve anti-aircraft artillery (AAA) divisions. The PLAGF is led by Commander Liu Zhenli and Political Commissar Qin Shutong.[168]
Navy
[edit]
Until the early 1990s, the PLA Navy (PLAN) performed a subordinate role to the PLA Ground Force (PLAGF). Since then it has undergone rapid modernisation. The 300,000 strong PLAN is organized into three major fleets: the North Sea Fleet headquartered at Qingdao, the East Sea Fleet headquartered at Ningbo, and the South Sea Fleet headquartered in Zhanjiang.[169] Each fleet consists of a number of surface ship, submarine, naval air force, coastal defence, and marine units.[170][2]
The navy includes a 25,000 strong Marine Corps (organised into seven brigades), a 18,000 strong Naval Aviation Force operating several hundred attack helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft.[171] As part of its overall programme of naval modernisation, the PLAN is in the stage of developing a blue water navy.[172] In November 2012, then Party General Secretary Hu Jintao reported to the CCP's 18th National Congress his desire to "enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resource and build China into a strong maritime power".[173] According to the United States Department of Defense, the PLAN has numerically the largest navy in the world.[174] The PLAN is led by Commander Dong Jun and Political Commissar Yuan Huazhi.[175]
Air Force
[edit]
The 403,000 strong People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) was organized into five Theatre Command Air Forces (TCAF) and 24 air divisions.[2] As of 2024[update], the system has been changed into 11 Corps Deputy-grade "Bases" controlling air brigades.[176] Divisions have been mostly converted to brigades,[176] although some (specifically the Bomber divisions, and some of the special mission units)[2] remain operational as divisions. The largest operational units within the Aviation Corps is the air division, which has 2 to 3 aviation regiments, each with 20 to 36 aircraft. An Air Brigade has from 24 to 50 aircraft.[177]
The surface-to-air missile (SAM) Corps is organized into SAM divisions and brigades. There are also three airborne divisions manned by the PLAAF. J-XX and XXJ are names applied by Western intelligence agencies to describe programs by the People's Republic of China to develop one or more fifth-generation fighter aircraft.[178][179] The PLAAF is led by Commander Chang Dingqiu and Political Commissar Guo Puxiao.[180][181]
Rocket Force
[edit]The People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) is the main strategic missile force of the PLA and consists of at least 125,000 personnel.[2] It controls China's nuclear and conventional strategic missiles.[182] China's total nuclear arsenal size is estimated to be between 100 and 400 thermonuclear warheads. The PLARF is organized into bases sequentially numbered from 61 through 67, wherein the first six are operational and allocated to the nation's theatre commands while Base 67 serves as the PRC's central nuclear weapons storage facility.[183] The PLARF is led by Command Li Yuchao and Political Commissar Xu Zhongbo.[184]
Arms
[edit]The PLA maintains four arms (Chinese: 兵种): the Aerospace Force, the Cyberspace Force, the Information Support Force, and the Joint Logistics Support Force. The four-arm system was established on 19 April 2024.[165]
Personnel
[edit]Recruitment and terms of service
[edit]The PLA began as an all-volunteer force. In 1955, as part of an effort to modernize the PLA, the first Military Service Law created a system of compulsory military service.[1] Since the late 1970s, the PLA has been a hybrid force that combines conscripts and volunteers.[1][185][186] Conscripts who fulfilled their service obligation can stay in the military as volunteer soldiers for a total of 16 years.[1][186] De jure, military service with the PLA is obligatory for all Chinese citizens. However, mandatory military service has not been enacted in China since 1949.[187][188] Due to the effect of the one-child policy, over 70 percent of the PLA and 80 percent of its combat troops come from one-child households, according to Liu Mingfu of the National Defense University.[189]
Women and ethnic minorities
[edit]

Women participated extensively in unconventional warfare, including in combat positions, in the Chinese Red Army during the revolutionary period, Chinese Civil War (1927–1949) and the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945).[190][191] After the establishment of the People's Republic of China, along with the People's Liberation Army (PLA)'s transition toward the conventional military organization, the role of women in the armed forces gradually reduced to support, medical, and logistics roles.[190] It was considered a prestigious choice for women to join the military. Serving in the military opens up opportunities for education, training, higher status, and relocation to cities after completing the service. During the Cultural Revolution, military service was regarded as a privilege and a method to avoid the Down to the Countryside Movement.[190]
In the 1980s, the PLA underwent large-scale demobilization amid the Chinese economic reform, and women were discharged back to civilian society for economic development while the exclusion of women in the military expanded.[190] In the 1990s, the PLA revived the recruitment of female personnel in regular military formations but primarily focused on non-combat roles at specialized positions.[190] Most women were trained in areas such as academic/engineering, medics, communications, intelligence, cultural work, and administrative work, as these positions conform to the traditional gender roles. Women in the PLA were more likely to be cadets and officers instead of enlisted soldiers because of their specializations.[190] The military organization still preserved some female combat units as public exemplars of social equality.[190][191]
Both enlisted and cadet women personnel underwent the same basic training as their male counterparts in the PLA, but many of them serve in predominantly female organizations. Due to ideological reasons, the regulation governing the segregation of sex in the PLA is prohibited, but a quasi-segregated arrangement for women's organizations is still applied through considerations of convenience.[190] Women were likelier to hold commanding positions in female-heavy organizations such as medical, logistic, research, and political work units, but sometimes in combat units during peacetime.[190] In PLAAF, women traditionally pilot transport aircraft or serve as crew members.[192] There had been a small number of high-ranking female officials in the PLA since 1949, but the advancement of position had remained relatively uncommon.[190][191] In the 2010s, women were increasingly serving in combat roles, in mixed-gender organizations alongside their male counterparts, and to the same physical standard.[191]
The military actively promotes opportunities for women in the military, such as celebrating International Women's Day for the members of the armed forces, publicizing the number of firsts for female officers and enlisted personnel, including deployments with peacekeeping forces or serving on PLA Navy's first aircraft carrier, announcing female military achievements in state media, and promoting female special forces through news reports or popular media.[191] PLA does not publish detailed gender composition of its armed forces, but the Jamestown Foundation estimated approximately 5% of the active military force in China is female.[193]
National unity and territorial integrity are central themes of the Chinese Communist Revolution. The Chinese Red Army and the succeeding PLA actively recruited ethnic minorities. During the Chinese Civil War, Mongol cavalry units were formed. During the Korean War, as many as 50,000 ethnic Koreans in China volunteered to join the PLA. PLA's recruitment of minorities generally correlates to state policies. During the early years, minorities were given preferential treatment, with special attention given to recruitment and training. In the 1950s, ethnic Mongols accounted for 52% of all officers in Inner Mongolia military region. During the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution, armed forces emphasized "socialist culture", assimilation policies, and the construction of common identities between soldiers of different ethnicities.[194]
For ethnic minority cadets and officials, overall development follows national policies. Typically, minority officers hold officer positions in their home regions. Examples included over 34% of the battalion and regimental cadres in Yi autonomous region militia were of the Yi ethnicity, and 45% of the militia cadres in Tibetan local militia were of Tibetan ethnicity. Ethnical minorities achieved high-ranking positions in the PLA, and the percentage of appointments appears to follow the ratio of the Chinese population composition.[194] Prominent figures included ethnic Mongol general Ulanhu, who served in high-ranking roles in the Inner Mongolian region and as vice president of China, and ethnic Uyghur Saifuddin Azizi, a Lieutenant General who served in the CCP Central Committee.[194] There were a few instances of ethnic distrust within the PLA, with one prominent example being the defection of Margub Iskhakov, an ethnic Muslim Tatar PLA general, to the Soviet Union in the 1960s. However, his defection largely contributed to his disillusion with the failed Great Leap Forward policies, instead of his ethnic background.[195] In modern times, ethnic representation is most visible among junior-ranking officers. Only a few minorities reach the highest-ranking positions.[195]
Rank structure
[edit]Officers
[edit]Other ranks
[edit]| Rank group | Senior NCOs | Junior NCOs | Enlisted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一级军士长 Yījí jūnshìzhǎng |
二级军士长 Èrjí jūnshìzhǎng |
三级军士长 Sānjí jūnshìzhǎng |
四级军士长 Sìjí jūnshìzhǎng |
上士 Shàngshì |
中士 Zhōngshì |
下士 Xiàshì |
上等兵 Shàngděngbīng |
列兵 Lièbīng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 海军一级军士长 Hǎijūn yījí jūnshìzhǎng |
海军二级军士长 Hǎijūn èrjí jūnshìzhǎng |
海军三级军士长 Hǎijūn sānjí jūnshìzhǎng |
海军四级军士长 Hǎijūn sìjí jūnshìzhǎng |
海军上士 Hǎijūn shàngshì |
海军中士 Hǎijūn zhōngshì |
海军下士 Hǎijūn xiàshì |
海军上等兵 Hǎijūn shàngděngbīng |
海军列兵 Hǎijūn lièbīng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 空军一级军士长 Kōngjūn yījí jūnshìzhǎng |
空军二级军士长 Kōngjūn èrjí jūnshìzhǎng |
空军三级军士长 Kōngjūn sānjí jūnshìzhǎng |
空军四级军士长 Kōngjūn sìjí jūnshìzhǎng |
空军上士 Kōngjūn shàngshì |
空军中士 Kōngjūn zhōngshì |
空军下士 Kōngjūn xiàshì |
空军上等兵 Kōngjūn shàngděngbīng |
空军列兵 Kōngjūn lièbīng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No equivalent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Master sergeant class one 一级军士长 yījí jūnshìzhǎng |
Master sergeant class two 二级军士长 èrjí jūnshìzhǎng |
Master sergeant class three 三级军士长 sānjí jūnshìzhǎng |
Master sergeant class four 四级军士长 sìjí jūnshìzhǎng |
Sergeant first class 上士 shàngshì |
Sergeant 中士 zhōngshì |
Corporal 下士 xiàshì |
Private first class 上等兵 shàngděngbīng |
Private 列兵 lièbīng
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 一级军士长 Yījí jūnshìzhǎng |
二级军士长 Èrjí jūnshìzhǎng |
三级军士长 Sānjí jūnshìzhǎng |
四级军士长 Sìjí jūnshìzhǎng |
上士 Shàngshì |
中士 Zhōngshì |
下士 Xiàshì |
上等兵 Shàngděngbīng |
列兵 Lièbīng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weapons and equipment
[edit]According to the United States Department of Defense, China is developing kinetic-energy weapons, high-powered lasers, high-powered microwave weapons, particle-beam weapons, and electromagnetic pulse weapons with its increase of military fundings.[197]
Responding to reports that its modernisation is dependent on sales of advanced technology from American allies, PLA senior leadership have stated: "Some have politicized China's normal commercial cooperation with foreign countries, damaging our reputation." These contributions include advanced European diesel engines for Chinese warships, military helicopter designs from Eurocopter, French anti-submarine sonars and helicopters,[198] Australian technology for the Houbei class missile boat,[199] and Israeli supplied American missile, laser and aircraft technology.[200]
According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute's data, China became the world's third largest exporter of major arms in 2010–14, an increase of 143 percent from the period 2005–2009.[201] SIPRI also calculated that China surpassed Russia to become the world's second largest arms exporter by 2020.[202]
China's share of global arms exports hence increased from 3 to 5 percent. China supplied major arms to 35 states in 2010–14. A significant percentage (just over 68 percent) of Chinese exports went to three countries: Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar. China also exported major arms to 18 African states. Examples of China's increasing global presence as an arms supplier in 2010–14 included deals with Venezuela for armoured vehicles and transport and trainer aircraft, with Algeria for three frigates, with Indonesia for the supply of hundreds of anti-ship missiles and with Nigeria for the supply of several unmanned combat aerial vehicles.[203]
Following rapid advances in its arms industry, China has become less dependent on arms imports, which decreased by 42 percent between 2005–09 and 2010–14. Russia accounted for 61 percent of Chinese arms imports, followed by France with 16 percent and Ukraine with 13 per cent. Helicopters formed a major part of Russian and French deliveries, with the French designs produced under licence in China.[203]
Over the years, China has struggled to design and produce effective engines for combat and transport vehicles. It continued to import large numbers of engines from Russia and Ukraine in 2010–14 for indigenously designed combat, advanced trainer and transport aircraft, and naval ships. It also produced British-, French- and German-designed engines for combat aircraft, naval ships and armoured vehicles, mostly as part of agreements that have been in place for decades.[203]
In August 2021, China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile that circled the globe before speeding towards its target.[204] The Financial Times reported that "the test showed that China had made astounding progress on hypersonic weapons and was far more advanced than U.S. officials realized."[205] During the Zapad 2021 joint strategic exercise, most of the gear comprised novel Chinese arms such as the KJ-500 airborne early warning and control aircraft, J-20 and J-16 fighters, Y-20 transport planes, and surveillance and combat drones.[206] Another joint forces exercise took place in August 2023 near Alaska.[207]
On 24 September 2024, the PLARF performed its first intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) test over the Pacific Ocean since the early 1980s.[208][209]
Cyberwarfare
[edit]There is a belief in the Western military doctrines that the PLA have already begun engaging countries using cyber-warfare.[210] There has been a significant increase in the number of presumed Chinese military initiated cyber events from 1999 to the present day.[211]
Cyberwarfare has gained recognition as a valuable technique because it is an asymmetric technique that is a part of information operations and information warfare. As is written by two PLAGF Colonels, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui in the book Unrestricted Warfare, "Methods that are not characterized by the use of the force of arms, nor by the use of military power, nor even by the presence of casualties and bloodshed, are just as likely to facilitate the successful realization of the war's goals, if not more so.[212]
While China has long been suspected of cyber spying, on 24 May 2011 the PLA announced the existence of having 'cyber capabilities'.[213]
In February 2013, the media named "Comment Crew" as a hacker military faction for China's People's Liberation Army.[214] In May 2014, a Federal Grand Jury in the United States indicted five Unit 61398 officers on criminal charges related to cyber attacks on private companies based in the United States after alleged investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation who exposed their identities in collaboration with US intelligence agencies such as the CIA.[215][216]
In February 2020, the United States government indicted members of China's People's Liberation Army for the 2017 Equifax data breach, which involved hacking into Equifax and plundering sensitive data as part of a massive heist that also included stealing trade secrets, though the CCP denied these claims.[217][218]
Nuclear capabilities
[edit]
The first of China's nuclear weapons tests took place in 1964, and its first hydrogen bomb test occurred in 1967 at Lop Nur. Tests continued until 1996, when the country signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), but did not ratify it.[219]
The number of nuclear warheads in China's arsenal remains a state secret.[220] There are varying estimates of the size of China's arsenal. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and Federation of American Scientists estimated in 2024 that China has a stockpile of approximately 438 nuclear warheads,[220][221] while the United States Department of Defense put the estimate at more than 500 operational nuclear warheads,[222] making it the third-largest in the world.
China's policy has traditionally been one of no first use while maintaining a deterrent retaliatory force targeted for countervalue targets.[223] According to a 2023 study by the National Defense University, China's nuclear doctrine has historically leaned toward maintaining a secure second-strike capability.[224]
Space
[edit]Having witnessed the crucial role of space to United States military success in the Gulf War, China continues to view space as a critical domain in both conflict and international strategic competition.[225][226] The PLA operates a various satellite constellations performing reconnaissance, navigation, communication, and counterspace functions.[227][228][229][230] Planners at PLA's National Defense University project China's space actions as retaliatory or preventative, following conditions like an attack on a Chinese satellite, an attack on China, or the interruption of a PLA amphibious landing.[231] According to this approach, PLA planners assume that the country must have the capacity for retaliation and second-strike capability against a powerful opponent.[231] PLA planners envision a limited space war and therefore seek to identify weak but critical nodes in other space systems.[231]
Significant components of the PLA's space-based reconnaissance include Jianbing (vanguard) satellites with cover names Yaogan (遥感; 'remote sensing') and Gaofen (高分; 'high resolution').[227][232] These satellites collect electro-optical (EO) imagery to collect a literal representation of a target, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery to penetrate the cloudy climates of southern China,[233] and electronic intelligence (ELINT) to provide targeting intelligence on adversarial ships.[234][235] The PLA also leverages a restricted, high-performance service of the country's BeiDou positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) satellites for its forces and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) platforms.[236][237] For secure communications, the PLA uses the Zhongxing and Fenghuo series of satellites which enable secure data and voice transmission over C-band, Ku-band, and UHF.[229] PLA deployment of anti-satellite and counterspace satellites including those of the Shijian and Shiyan series have also brought significant concern from western nations.[238][230][239]
The PLA also plays a significant role in the Chinese space program.[225] To date, all the participants have been selected from members of the PLA Air Force.[225] China became the third country in the world to have sent a man into space by its own means with the flight of Yang Liwei aboard the Shenzhou 5 spacecraft on 15 October 2003,[240] the flight of Fei Junlong and Nie Haisheng aboard Shenzhou 6 on 12 October 2005,[241] and Zhai Zhigang, Liu Boming, and Jing Haipeng aboard Shenzhou 7 on 25 September 2008.[242]
The PLA started the development of an anti-ballistic and anti-satellite system in the 1960s, code named Project 640, including ground-based lasers and anti-satellite missiles.[243] On 11 January 2007, China conducted a successful test of an anti-satellite missile, with an SC-19 class KKV.[244]
The PLA has tested two types of hypersonic space vehicles, the Shenglong Spaceplane and a new one built by Chengdu Aircraft Corporation. Only a few pictures have appeared since it was revealed in late 2007. Earlier, images of the High-enthalpy Shock Waves Laboratory wind tunnel of the CAS Key Laboratory of high-temperature gas dynamics (LHD) were published in the Chinese media. Tests with speeds up to Mach 20 were reached around 2001.[245][246]
Budget
[edit]China's official military budget for 2025 was at 1.78 trillion yuan (US$246 billion), which is an increase of 7.2% over the last year.[247] The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) estimated that China's military expenditure was US$314 billion in 2024, the second-largest in the world after the United States and accounting for 12 percent of the world's defence expenditures.[3]
|
|
Symbols
[edit]Anthem
[edit]
The March of the Chinese People's Liberation Army was adopted as the military anthem by the Central Military Commission on 25 July 1988.[251] The lyrics of the anthem were written by composer Gong Mu (real name: Zhang Yongnian; Chinese: 张永年) and the music was composed by Korea-born Chinese composer Zheng Lücheng.[252][253]
Flag and insignia
[edit]The PLA's insignia consists of a roundel with a red star bearing the two Chinese characters "八一"(literally "eight-one"), referring to the Nanchang uprising which began on 1 August 1927 (first day of the eighth month) and symbolic as the CCP's founding of the PLA.[254] The inclusion of the two characters ("八一") is symbolic of the party's revolutionary history carrying strong emotional connotations of the political power which it shed blood to obtain. The flag of the Chinese People's Liberation Army is the war flag of the People's Liberation Army; the layout of the flag has a golden star at the top left corner and "八一" to the right of the star, placed on a red field. Each service branch also has its flags: The top 5⁄8 of the flags is the same as the PLA flag; the bottom 3⁄8 are occupied by the colors of the branches.[255]
The flag of the Ground Forces has a forest green bar at the bottom. The naval ensign has stripes of blue and white at the bottom. The Air Force uses a sky blue bar. The Rocket Force uses a yellow bar at the bottom. The forest green represents the earth, the blue and white stripes represent the seas, the sky blue represents the air and the yellow represents the flare of missile launching.[256][257]
-
PLA
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Allen, Kenneth (14 January 2022). "The Evolution of the PLA's Enlisted Force: Conscription and Recruitment (Part One)". Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 16 April 2023. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
Following the setback of the Cultural Revolution, in the late 1970s, the PLA embarked on an ambitious program to modernize many aspects of the military, including education, training, and recruitment. Conscripts and volunteers were combined into a single system that allowed conscripts who fulfilled their service obligation to stay in the military as volunteer soldiers for a total of 16 years.
- ^ a b c d e f g h The International Institute for Strategic Studies 2025, p. 240.
- ^ a b c "Trends in Military Expenditure 2024" (PDF). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. April 2025. Retrieved 28 April 2025.
- ^ Xue, Maryann (4 July 2021). "China's arms trade: which countries does it buy from and sell to?". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 26 May 2022. Retrieved 26 May 2022.
- ^ a b "TIV of arms imports/exports from China, 2010–2021". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 7 February 2022. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
- ^ "Global military spending remains high at $1.7 trillion". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 2 May 2018. Archived from the original on 27 May 2018. Retrieved 13 October 2018.
- ^ a b Saunders et al. 2019, pp. 13–14.
- ^ a b c d e Saunders et al. 2019, p. 521.
- ^ "The PLA Navy's New Historic Missions: Expanding Capabilities for a Re-emergent Maritime Power" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 April 2011. Retrieved 1 April 2011.
- ^ a b Garlick, Jeremy (2024). Advantage China: Agent of Change in an Era of Global Disruption. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1-350-25231-8.
- ^ Carter, James (4 August 2021). "The Nanchang Uprising and the birth of the PLA". The China Project. Archived from the original on 7 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ "History of the PLA's Ground Force Organisational Structure and Military Regions". Royal United Services Institute. 17 June 2004. Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Bianco, Lucien (1971). Origins of the Chinese Revolution, 1915–1949. Stanford University Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-8047-0827-2.
- ^ a b Benton, Gregor (1999). New Fourth Army: Communist Resistance Along the Yangtze and the Huai, 1938–1941. University of California Press. p. 396. ISBN 978-0-520-21992-2. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Zedong, Mao (2017). On Guerilla Warfare: Mao Tse-Tung On Guerilla Warfare. Martino Fine Books. ISBN 978-1-68422-164-6.
- ^ "1946年,第一次使用"中国人民解放军"称谓". 解放军报. 6 July 2017. Archived from the original on 9 July 2017.
- ^ "【延安记忆】"中国人民解放军"称谓由此开始". 1 August 2020. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ "1947年10月10日,《中国人民解放军宣言》发布". 中国军网. 10 October 2017. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ "中国共产党领导的红军改编为八路军的背景和改编情况 – 太行英雄网". Archived from the original on 7 January 2022. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
- ^ "The Chinese Revolution of 1949". United States Department of State, Office of the Historian. Archived from the original on 19 May 2017. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Ken Allen, Chapter 9, "PLA Air Force Organization" Archived 2007-09-29 at the Wayback Machine, The PLA as Organization, ed. James C. Mulvenon and Andrew N.D. Yang (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2002), 349.
- ^ "中国人民解放军海军成立70周年多国海军活动新闻发布会在青岛举行". mod.gov.cn (in Chinese). Ministry of National Defence of the People's Republic of China. Archived from the original on 1 October 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
- ^ a b c d Russo, Alessandro (2020). Cultural Revolution and revolutionary culture. Durham: Duke University Press. pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-4780-1218-4. OCLC 1156439609.
- ^ a b "China's People's Liberation Army, the world's second largest conventional..." UPI. Archived from the original on 4 December 2022. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- ^ Pamphlet number 30-51, Handbook on the Chinese Communist Army (PDF), Department of the Army, 7 December 1960, archived from the original (PDF) on 29 April 2011, retrieved 1 April 2011
- ^ Loh, Dylan M.H. (2024). China's Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9781503638204.
- ^ a b c d Fravel, M. Taylor (2019). Active Defense: China's Military Strategy since 1949. Vol. 2. Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv941tzj. ISBN 978-0-691-18559-0. JSTOR j.ctv941tzj. S2CID 159282413.
- ^ a b Stewart, Richard (2015). The Korean War: The Chinese Intervention. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 978-1-5192-3611-1. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Cliff, Roger; Fei, John; Hagen, Jeff; Hague, Elizabeth; Heginbotham, Eric; Stillion, John (2011), "The Evolution of Chinese Air Force Doctrine", Shaking the Heavens and Splitting the Earth, Chinese Air Force Employment Concepts in the 21st Century, RAND Corporation, pp. 33–46, ISBN 978-0-8330-4932-2, JSTOR 10.7249/mg915af.10
- ^ Hoffman, Steven A. (1990). India and the China Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 101–104. ISBN 978-0-520-30172-6. Archived from the original on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- ^ Van Tronder, Gerry (2018). Sino-Indian War: Border Clash: October–November 1962. Pen and Sword Military. ISBN 978-1-5267-2838-8. Archived from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- ^ a b Brahma Chellaney (2006). Asian Juggernaut: The Rise of China, India, and Japan. HarperCollins. p. 195. ISBN 978-8172236502.
Indeed, Beijing's acknowledgement of Indian control over Sikkim seems limited to the purpose of facilitating trade through the vertiginous Nathu-la Pass, the scene of bloody artillery duels in September 1967 when Indian troops beat back attacking Chinese forces.
- ^ Van Praagh, David (2003). Greater Game: India's Race with Destiny and China. McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP. p. 301. ISBN 978-0773525887. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 6 August 2021.
(Indian) jawans trained and equipped for high-altitude combat used US provided artillery, deployed on higher ground than that of their adversaries, to decisive tactical advantage at Nathu La and Cho La near the Sikkim-Tibet border.
- ^ Hoontrakul, Ponesak (2014), "Asia's Evolving Economic Dynamism and Political Pressures", in P. Hoontrakul; C. Balding; R. Marwah (eds.), The Global Rise of Asian Transformation: Trends and Developments in Economic Growth Dynamics, Palgrave Macmillan US, p. 37, ISBN 978-1-137-41236-2, archived from the original on 25 December 2018, retrieved 6 August 2021,
Cho La incident (1967) – Victorious: India / Defeated : China
- ^ a b Li, Xiaobing (2007). A History of the Modern Chinese Army. University Press of Kentucky. doi:10.2307/j.ctt2jcq4k. ISBN 978-0-8131-2438-4. JSTOR j.ctt2jcq4k.
- ^ Kindler, Benjamin (2025). Writing to the Rhythm of Labor: Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942-1976. New York City, NY: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-21932-7.
- ^ Ebrey, Patricia Buckley. "Four Modernizations Era". A Visual Sourcebook of Chinese Civilization. University of Washington. Archived from the original on 7 October 2010. Retrieved 20 October 2012.
- ^ 人民日报 (31 January 1963). 在上海举行的科学技术工作会议上周恩来阐述科学技术现代化的重大意义 [Science and Technology in Shanghai at the conference on Zhou Enlai explained the significance of modern science and technology]. People's Daily (in Chinese). Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. p. 1. Archived from the original on 14 February 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2011.
- ^ Mason, David (1984). "China's Four Modernizations: Blueprint for Development or Prelude to Turmoil?". Asian Affairs. 11 (3): 47–70. doi:10.1080/00927678.1984.10553699. ISSN 0092-7678. JSTOR 30171968.
- ^ Vincent, Travils (9 February 2022). "Why Won't Vietnam Teach the History of the Sino-Vietnamese War?". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Fravel, M. Taylor (2007). "Power Shifts and Escalation: Explaining China's Use of Force in Territorial Disputes". International Security. 32 (3): 44–83. doi:10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.44. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 30130518. S2CID 57559936.
- ^ China and Afghanistan, Gerald Segal, Asian Survey, Vol. 21, No. 11 (Nov., 1981), University of California Press
- ^ a b c Hilali, A.Z (September 2001). "China's response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan". Central Asian Survey. 20 (3): 323–351. doi:10.1080/02634930120095349. ISSN 0263-4937. S2CID 143657643.
- ^ a b Starri, S. Frederick (2004). Xinjiang: China's Muslim Borderland. M.E. Sharpe. pp. 157–158. ISBN 0765613182.
- ^ Szczudlik-Tatar, Justyna (October 2014). "China's Evolving Stance on Afghanistan: Towards More Robust Diplomacy with "Chinese Characteristics"" (PDF). Strategic File. 58 (22). Polish Institute of International Affairs. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 August 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Galster, Steve (9 October 2001). "Volume II: Afghanistan: Lessons from the Last War". National Security Archive, George Washington University. Archived from the original on 6 September 2021. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Godwin, Paul H. B. (2019). The Chinese Defense Establishment: Continuity And Change In The 1980s. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-31540-0. Archived from the original on 11 February 2024. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ a b c Lin, Shuanglin (2022). China's Public Finance: Reforms, Challenges, and Options. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-009-09902-8.
- ^ a b c Saunders et al. 2019, p. 523.
- ^ Zissis, Carin (5 December 2006). "Modernizing the People's Liberation Army of China". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 51.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 520.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 526.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, pp. 51–52.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 531.
- ^ "PLA's "Absolute Loyalty" to the Party in Doubt". The Jamestown Foundation. 30 April 2009. Archived from the original on 13 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ "Xi Jinping insists on PLA's absolute loyalty to Communist Party". The Economic Times. 20 August 2018. Archived from the original on 15 March 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Chan, Minnie (23 September 2022). "China's military told to 'resolutely do what the party asks it to do'". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 19 October 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ a b c The Political System of the People's Republic of China. Chief Editor Pu Xingzu, Shanghai, 2005, Shanghai People's Publishing House. ISBN 7-208-05566-1, Chapter 11 The State Military System.
- ^ "部队要做到政治合格、军事过硬、作风优良、纪律严明、保障有力" [The troops must be politically qualified, militarily competent, have good conduct, strict discipline and strong support]. People's Daily (in Chinese). 11 August 2006. Archived from the original on 13 October 2006. Retrieved 30 December 2024.
- ^ Farley, Robert (1 September 2021). "China Has Not Forgotten the Lessons of the Gulf War". National Interest. Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Scobell, Andrew (2011). Chinese Lessons from Other Peoples' Wars (PDF). Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. ISBN 978-1-58487-511-6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Lampton, David M. (2024). Living U.S.-China Relations: From Cold War to Cold War. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 225. ISBN 978-1-5381-8725-8.
- ^ Sasaki, Tomonori (23 September 2010). "China Eyes the Japanese Military: China's Threat Perception of Japan since the 1980s". The China Quarterly. 203: 560–580. doi:10.1017/S0305741010000597. ISSN 1468-2648. S2CID 153828298. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Sakaguchi, Yoshiaki; Mayama, Katsuhiko (1999). "Significance of the War in Kosovo for China and Russia" (PDF). NIDS Security Reports (3): 1–23. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 August 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Sun, Yun (8 April 2020). "China's Strategic Assessment of Afghanistan". War on the Rocks. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ a b Chase, Michael S. (19 September 2007). "China's Assessment of the War in Iraq: America's "Deepest Quagmire" and the Implications for Chinese National Security". China Brief. 7 (17). The Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ a b Ji, You (1999). "The Revolution in Military Affairs and the Evolution of China's Strategic Thinking". Contemporary Southeast Asia. 21 (3): 344–364. ISSN 0129-797X. JSTOR 25798464. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Wortzel, Larry M. (2007). "The Chinese People's Liberation Army and Space Warfare". Space Policy. American Enterprise Institute. JSTOR resrep03013.
- ^ Hjortdal, Magnus (2011). "China's Use of Cyber Warfare: Espionage Meets Strategic Deterrence". Journal of Strategic Security. 4 (2): 1–24. doi:10.5038/1944-0472.4.2.1. ISSN 1944-0464. JSTOR 26463924. S2CID 145083379.
- ^ Jinghua, Lyu. "What Are China's Cyber Capabilities and Intentions?". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ a b c d e Shinn, David H.; Eisenman, Joshua (2023). China's Relations with Africa: a New Era of Strategic Engagement. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-21001-0.
- ^ Osborn, Kris (21 March 2022). "China Modernizes Its Russian-Built Destroyers With New Weapons". The National Interest. Archived from the original on 4 February 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Gao, Charlie (1 January 2021). "How China Got Their Own Russian-Made Su-27 "Flanker" Jets". The National Interest. Archived from the original on 5 December 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Larson, Caleb (11 May 2021). "China's Deadly Kilo-Class Submarines Are From Russia With Love". The National Interest. Archived from the original on 4 February 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Vavasseur, Xavier (21 August 2022). "Five Type 052D Destroyers Under Construction In China". Naval News. Archived from the original on 25 August 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Wertheim, Eric (January 2020). "China's Luyang III/Type 052D Destroyer Is a Potent Adversary". United States Naval Institute. Archived from the original on 10 June 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Rogoway, Tyler; Helfrich, Emma (18 July 2022). "China's J-10 Fighter Spotted In New 'Big Spine' Configuration (Updated)". The Warzone. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Osborn, Kris (4 October 2022). "China Boosts J-20 Fighter Production to Counter U.S. Stealth Fighters". The National Interest. Archived from the original on 1 December 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Funaiole, Matthew P. (4 August 2021). "A Glimpse of Chinese Ballistic Missile Submarines". Center for Strategic & International Studies. Archived from the original on 7 October 2023.
- ^ Lendon, Brad (25 June 2022). "Never mind China's new aircraft carrier, these are the ships the US should worry about". CNN. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ "Fujian aircraft carrier doesn't have radar, weapon systems yet, photos show". South China Morning Post. 19 July 2022. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Hendrix, Jerry (6 July 2022). "The Ominous Portent of China's New Carrier". National Review. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ "China establishes Rocket Force and Strategic Support Force – China Military Online". Archived from the original on 10 April 2016. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
- ^ a b c d Duan, Lei (2024). "Towards a More Joint Strategy: Assessing Chinese Military Reforms and Militia Reconstruction". In Fang, Qiang; Li, Xiaobing (eds.). China under Xi Jinping: A New Assessment. Leiden University Press. ISBN 9789087284411. JSTOR jj.15136086.
- ^ "Exclusive: Massive parade tipped for PLA's 90th birthday". South China Morning Post. 15 March 2017. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Buckley, Chris (30 July 2017). "China Shows Off Military Might as Xi Jinping Tries to Cement Power". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 7 October 2021. Retrieved 12 October 2021.
- ^ "Chinese military purge exposes weakness, could widen". Reuters. 31 December 2023. Retrieved 22 July 2024.
- ^ "Charting China's 'great purge' under Xi". BBC News. 22 October 2017. Archived from the original on 6 June 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2024.
- ^ Yan, Sophia (10 July 2024). "China constructing secret military base in Tajikistan to crush threat from Taliban". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 22 July 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- ^ "Secret Signals: Decoding China's Intelligence Activities in Cuba". Center for Strategic and International Studies. 1 July 2024. Archived from the original on 2 July 2024. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
- ^ Garrison, Cassandra (31 January 2019). "China's military-run space station in Argentina is a 'black box'". Reuters. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
- ^ "Eyes on the Skies: China's Growing Space Footprint in South America". Center for Strategic and International Studies. 4 October 2022. Archived from the original on 5 October 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
- ^ Cheang, Sopheng; David, Rising (8 May 2024). "Chinese warships have been docked in Cambodia for 5 months, but government says it's not permanent". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 9 July 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- ^ "Chinese warships rotate at Cambodia's Ream naval base". Radio Free Asia. 4 July 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- ^ Gowan, Richard (14 September 2020). "China's pragmatic approach to UN peacekeeping". Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ a b c d Rowland, Daniel T. (September 2022). Chinese Security Cooperation Activities: Trends and Implications for US Policy (PDF) (Report). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ China's Role in UN Peacekeeping (PDF) (Report). Institute for Security & Development Policy. March 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 October 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Daniel M. Hartnett, 2012-03-13, China's First Deployment of Combat Forces to a UN. Peacekeeping Mission—South Sudan Archived 14 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission
- ^ Bernard Yudkin Geoxavier, 2012-09-18, China as Peacekeeper: An Updated Perspective on Humanitarian Intervention Archived 31 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Yale Journal of International Affairs
- ^ "Chinese Peacekeepers to Haiti: Much Attention, More Confusion". Royal United Services Institute. 1 February 2005. Archived from the original on 11 February 2024. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Nichols, Michelle (14 July 2022). "China pushes for U.N. arms embargo on Haiti criminal gangs". Reuters. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Dyrenforth, Thomas (19 August 2021). "Beijing's Blue Helmets: What to Make of China's Role in UN Peacekeeping in Africa". Modern War Institute. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 12 November 2022.
- ^ Lew, Christopher R.; Leung, Pak-Wah, eds. (2013). Historical Dictionary of the Chinese Civil War. Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow Press, Inc. p. 3. ISBN 978-0810878730. Archived from the original on 11 April 2023. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Paine, S. C. M. (2012). The Wars for Asia, 1911–1949. Cambridge University Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-1-139-56087-0. Archived from the original on 12 October 2022. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
- ^ "Security Check Required". Archived from the original on 14 April 2015. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
- ^ "Sinkiang and Sino-Soviet Relations" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
- ^ Shakya 1999 p. 32 (6 Oct); Goldstein (1997), p. 45 (7 Oct).
- ^ Ryan, Mark A.; Finkelstein, David M.; McDevitt, Michael A. (2003). Chinese warfighting: The PLA experience since 1949. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. p. 125. ISBN 0-7656-1087-6.
- ^ Rushkoff, Bennett C. (1981). "Eisenhower, Dulles and the Quemoy-Matsu Crisis, 1954–1955". Political Science Quarterly. 96 (3): 465–480. doi:10.2307/2150556. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2150556.
- ^ Zhai, Qiang (2000). China and the Vietnam wars, 1950–1975. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0807825327. OCLC 41564973.
- ^ The 1958 Taiwan Straits Crisis_ A Documented History. 1975.
- ^ Lintner, Bertil (2018). China's India War: Collision Course on the Roof of the World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-909163-8. OCLC 1034558154.
- ^ "Некоторые малоизвестные эпизоды пограничного конфликта на о. Даманском". Военное оружие и армии Мира. 3 February 2015. Archived from the original on 11 March 2018. Retrieved 10 March 2018.
- ^ Carl O. Schustser. "Battle for Paracel Islands". Archived 20 January 2022 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Elleman, Bruce A. (2001). Modern Chinese Warfare, 1795–1989. Routledge. p. 297. ISBN 0415214742.
- ^ Carlyle A. Thayer, "Security Issues in Southeast Asia: The Third Indochina War", Conference on Security and Arms Control in the North Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, August 1987.
- ^ Koo, Min Gyo (2010). Island Disputes and Maritime Regime Building in East Asia. The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific. New York, NY: Springer New York. p. 154. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-89670-0. ISBN 978-0-387-89669-4.
- ^ McFadden, Robert D. (5 June 1989). "The West Condemns the Crackdown". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 3 May 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2021.
- ^ Dreyer, June Teufel (2005). "China's Vulnerability to Minority Separatism". Asian Affairs. 32 (2): 69–85. doi:10.3200/AAFS.32.2.69-86. ISSN 0092-7678. JSTOR 30172869. S2CID 153883722. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Qimao, Chen (1996). "The Taiwan Strait Crisis: Its Crux and Solutions". Asian Survey. 36 (11): 1055–1066. doi:10.2307/2645635. ISSN 0004-4687. JSTOR 2645635. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Henry, Jérôme (November 2016). "China's Military Deployments in the Gulf of Aden: Anti-Piracy and Beyond" (PDF). Notes de l'Ifri (89). Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 November 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Torode, Greg (13 March 2014). "A nervous region eyes robust Chinese response to missing Malaysian plane". Reuters. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ "Troop and police contributors". United Nations Peacekeeping. Archived from the original on 30 June 2019. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
- ^ "UNMISS Fact Sheet". UNMISS. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 22 December 2017.
- ^ Tellis, Ashley J. (June 2020). Hustling in the Himalayas: The Sino-Indian Border Confrontation (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Report). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 29 June 2020.
These efforts to bring new territorial enclaves under Chinese control are occurring simultaneously at several different locations, such as on the northern bank of the Pangong Tso, at Hot Springs, and in the Galwan Valley, places that all lie astride the LAC in eastern Ladakh
- ^ Pollpeter & Allen 2012, p. 50.
- ^ Wei, Changhao (29 March 2022). "Explainer: How Seats in China's National People's Congress Are Allocated". NPC Observer. Archived from the original on 10 March 2024. Retrieved 10 March 2024.
- ^ "中华人民共和国第十四届全国人民代表大会代表名单" [List of Deputies to the 14th National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China]. People's Daily. 25 February 2024. Archived from the original on 26 April 2023. Retrieved 23 July 2024.
- ^ a b c Liu, Zhen (18 October 2022). "What is China's Central Military Commission and why is it so powerful?". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 20 September 2023. Retrieved 18 September 2023.
- ^ The Political System of the People's Republic of China. Chief Editor Pu Xingzu, Shanghai, 2005, Shanghai People's Publishing House. ISBN 7-208-05566-1 Chapter 11, the State Military System, pp. 369–392.
- ^ "Xi Jinping Has a New Title: Commander-in-Chief of the People's Liberation Army". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
- ^ Pollpeter & Allen 2012, p. 101.
- ^ Lague, David; Lim, Benjamin Kang (23 April 2019). "How China is replacing America as Asia's military titan". Reuters. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
- ^ Pollpeter & Allen 2012, pp. 84–85.
- ^ a b c "Xi Jinping is obsessed with political loyalty in the PLA". The Economist. 6 November 2023. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 7 November 2023. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ a b Torode, Greg; Tian, Yew Lun (20 September 2023). "Li Shangfu: Who is China's missing defence minister and how important is he?". Reuters. Archived from the original on 24 September 2023. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
- ^ a b "军事制度" [Military System]. China Internet Information Center. Archived from the original on 13 June 2007. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ a b c Allen, Kenneth; Chao, Brian; Kinsella, Ryan (4 March 2013). "China's Military Political Commissar System in Comparative Perspective". Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 21 October 2020. Retrieved 7 November 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f Pollpeter & Allen 2012, p. 16.
- ^ Cunningham, Fiona S. (2025). Under the Nuclear Shadow: China's Information-Age Weapons in International Security. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-26103-4.
- ^ Pollpeter & Allen 2012, p. 18.
- ^ Kaufman & Mackenzie 2009, pp. 73–74.
- ^ a b Pollpeter & Allen 2012, p. 17.
- ^ Kaufman & Mackenzie 2009, p. 73.
- ^ a b Kaufman & Mackenzie 2009, p. 74.
- ^ a b c Wuthnow, Joel; Saunders, Phillip C. (16 March 2021). "A New Step Forward in PLA Professionalization". The Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 22 June 2024. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
- ^ Allen, Kenneth (22 July 2010). "Assessing the PLA's Promotion Ladder to CMC Member Based on Grades vs. Ranks – Part 1". The Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 11 May 2024. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
- ^ Pollpeter & Allen 2012, p. 19.
- ^ Kaufman & Mackenzie 2009, p. 77.
- ^ "中国公务员的级别和职级" [Chinese civil service grades and ranks]. Dalate Banner Party Building Network (in Chinese). 9 March 2023. Archived from the original on 14 June 2024. Retrieved 14 June 2024.
- ^ "Considerations for replacing Military Area Commands with Theater Commands". english.chinamil.com.cn. Archived from the original on 23 February 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
- ^ ATP 7-100.3: Chinese Tactics 2021, p. 2-4.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 235.
- ^ ATP 7-100.3: Chinese Tactics 2021, pp. 2-5–2-6.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 355.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 715.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 714.
- ^ a b Saunders et al. 2019, p. 137.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 61.
- ^ Saunders et al. 2019, p. 146.
- ^ a b Saunders et al. 2019, p. 234.
- ^ "China establishes Joint Logistic Support Force - China Military". Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
- ^ Allen, Kenneth; Chen, Minzhi (2019). "The People's Liberation Army's 37 Academic Institutions" (PDF). Air University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 July 2024. Retrieved 14 May 2024.
- ^ a b "Chinese PLA embraces a new system of services and arms: Defence spokesperson - China Military". eng.chinamil.com.cn. Archived from the original on 20 April 2024. Retrieved 20 April 2024.
- ^ Wong, Edward; Perlez, Jane; Buckley, Chris (2 September 2015). "China Announces Cuts of 300,000 Troops at Military Parade Showing Its Might". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2 September 2015. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
- ^ China plans military reform to enhance its readiness Archived 2 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine – The-Japan-news.com
- ^ Jia Nan (贾楠) (5 July 2021). 4人晋升上将!. Sina (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 9 July 2021. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
- ^ Chi-yuk, Choi (27 May 2013). "PLA Navy's three fleets meet in South China Sea for rare show of force". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ The PLA Navy: New Capabilities and Missions for the 21st Century (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: Office of Naval Intelligence. 2 December 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ The International Institute for Strategic Studies 2025, p. 244.
- ^ Farley, Robert (10 November 2021). "Does China Qualify as Having a True Blue Water Navy?". The National Interest. Archived from the original on 11 February 2024. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ "China launches two destroyers with tech similar to US Navy's Aegis system". 3 July 2018. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
- ^ Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2020 Annual Report to Congress (PDF). U.S. Department of Defense. 9 July 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 July 2022. Retrieved 13 November 2022.
- ^ 习近平今再晋升5名上将. rfi.fr (in Chinese). 6 September 2021. Archived from the original on 7 September 2021. Retrieved 7 September 2021.
- ^ a b Trevethan, Lawrence (2018). "Brigadization" of the PLA Air Force (PDF). China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI). pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-1718721159. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 September 2023. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
{{cite book}}:|website=ignored (help) - ^ "The Dragon's Wing: The People's Liberation Army Air Force's Strategy > Air University (AU) > Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs Article Display". www.airuniversity.af.edu. August 2022. Archived from the original on 22 August 2022. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
- ^ Chang 2002
- ^ Coniglio 2006, P.44
- ^ Marcus, Clay; Rod, Lee (24 September 2021). "Star General Chang Dingqiu Takes Command of China's Air Force". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 27 September 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
- ^ "[军事报道]张又侠在出席中央军委纪委扩大会议时强调 坚决贯彻全面从严治党战略方针 深入做好新时代军队纪检监察工作" [[Military Report] Zhang Youxia, when attending the enlarged meeting of the Disciplinary Commission of the Central Military Commission, emphasized that we must resolutely implement the strategic policy of strictly governing the party in an all-round way and do a good job in the military discipline inspection and supervision work in the new era.]. [[China Central Television] (in Chinese). 22 January 2022. Archived from the original on 22 January 2022.
- ^ Lee, Roderick; Béraud-Sudreau, Lucie; Brewster, David; Cairns, Christopher; Ellis, R. Evan; Herlevi, April; Nantulya, Paul; Nouwens, Meia; Pincus, Rebecca; Wuthnow, Joel (2022). "PLA Rocket Force as a Service". PLA Rocket Force as a Service: New Team Player or Increasingly Irrelevant?. pp. 133–154. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
{{cite book}}:|journal=ignored (help) - ^ Kristensen, Hans M.; Korda, Matt (2 November 2021). "Chinese nuclear weapons, 2021". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 77 (6): 318–336. Bibcode:2021BuAtS..77f.318K. doi:10.1080/00963402.2021.1989208. ISSN 0096-3402. S2CID 244118657.
- ^ Xiu, Ma (24 October 2022). PLA Rocket Force Organization (PDF) (Report). China Aerospace Studies Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 October 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ "China is struggling to recruit enough highly skilled troops". The Economist. 6 November 2023. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 10 February 2024. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
In the late 1970s it adopted the current hybrid system of volunteers and conscripts.
- ^ a b Allen, Kenneth W.; Corbett, Thomas; Taylor A., Lee; Xiu, Ma (3 November 2022). "Personnel of the People's Liberation Army" (PDF). United States–China Economic and Security Review Commission. p. 23. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 December 2023. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
- ^ Wang, Amber (30 April 2022). "The new rules China hopes will build more professional soldiers". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 July 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- ^ "Taiwan Is Extending Conscription. Here's How Its Military Compares to Other Countries". Time. 6 January 2023. Archived from the original on 8 January 2023. Retrieved 8 January 2023.
- ^ Chan, Minnie (5 February 2014). "Soldiers of the one-child era: are they too weak to fulfill Beijing's military ambitions?". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 11 July 2025.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Li, Xiaolin (1993). "Chinese Women in the People's Liberation Army: Professionals or Quasi-Professionals?". Armed Forces & Society. 20 (1): 69–83. doi:10.1177/0095327X9302000105. JSTOR 45346560.
- ^ a b c d e Kania, Elsa (4 October 2016). "Holding Up Half the Sky? (Part 1)—The Evolution of Women's Roles in the PLA". China Brief. 16 (15). Archived from the original on 1 April 2024. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
- ^ W. Allen, Kenneth (15 November 2021). "Females in the PLA Air Force". China Aerospace Studies Institute. Archived from the original on 1 April 2024. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
- ^ Kania, Elsa; Allen, Kenneth (26 October 2016). "Holding Up Half the Sky? (Part 2)—The Evolution of Women's Roles in the PLA". China Brief. 16 (16). Archived from the original on 1 April 2024. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
- ^ a b c William R., Heaton (1977). "The Minorities and the Military in China". Armed Forces & Society. 3 (2): 325–342. doi:10.1177/0095327X7700300211. JSTOR 45346013.
- ^ a b Yang, Zi (9 September 2017). "Ethnicity factors strongly in PLA promotions". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 1 April 2024. Retrieved 1 April 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f Ping, Xu (7 August 2017). "我军建军九十年军衔制度沿革" [The evolution of our military rank system over the ninety years of its establishment]. mod.gov.cn (in Chinese). Ministry of National Defense. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
- ^ The Standard, 5 March 2008, Volume 1, No. 134, Major jump in military spending, Alarm raised over cyber, space advance, the Pentagon said in a report. … "The PLA is also exploring satellite jammers, kinetic-energy weapons, high-powered lasers, high-powered microwave weapons, particle-beam weapons, and electromagnetic pulse weapons for counterspace application", it said, adding it was not clear if the cyber intrusions were backed by the military.
- ^ Lague, David (19 December 2013). "Chinese military's secret to success: European engineering". Reuters. Archived from the original on 20 December 2013. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
- ^ Lague, David. "Insight: From a ferry, a Chinese fast-attack boat." Archived 16 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine Reuters, 31 May 2012.
- ^ "U.S. up in arms over Sino-Israeli ties". Asia Times. 21 December 2004. Archived from the original on 16 May 2008. Retrieved 11 June 2008.
- ^ "The United States leads upward trend in arms exports, Asian and Gulf states arms imports up, says SIPRI". sipri.org. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 16 March 2015. Archived from the original on 9 April 2016. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ "New SIPRI data reveals scale of Chinese arms industry". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 27 January 2020. Archived from the original on 27 January 2020. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
- ^ a b c "Trends in International Arms Transfer, 2014". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Archived from the original on 19 March 2015. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
- ^ "Biden airs hypersonic missile fears as probable ambassador labels China 'untrustworthy'". Deutsche Welle. 20 October 2021. Archived from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- ^ "China successfully tested hypersonic weapon in August: report". Space.com. 17 October 2021. Archived from the original on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- ^ Bonny Lin, Matthew P. Funaiole, Brian Hart, et.al. China Power Project. (2023). "How Deep Are China-Russia Military Ties?". Center for Strategic and International Studies website Archived 7 August 2023 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 7 August 2023.
- ^ Michael R. Gordon and Nancy A. Youssef. (6 Aug 2023). "Russia and China Sent Large Naval Patrol Near Alaska". Wall Street Journal website Archived 7 August 2023 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 7 August 2023.
- ^ Davidson, Helen (25 September 2024). "China test launches intercontinental ballistic missile for first time in decades". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
- ^ "China conducts rare public test launch of intercontinental ballistic missile". The Independent. 25 September 2024. Archived from the original on 25 September 2024. Retrieved 25 September 2024.
- ^ Gorman, Siobhan (8 April 2009). "Electricity Grid in U.S. Penetrated By Spies". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 8 January 2015. Retrieved 1 April 2011.
- ^ Krekel, Bryan (2009), Capability of the People's Republic of China to Conduct Cyber Warfare and Computer Network Exploitation (PDF), Northrop Grumman, archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2011
- ^ Qiao, Liang; Wang, Xiangsui (1999), Unrestricted Warfare (PDF), PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House via Foreign Broadcast Information Service, archived from the original (PDF) on 15 August 2000
- ^ Beech, Hannah. "Meet China's Newest Soldiers: An Online Blue Army." Archived 27 September 2024 at the Wayback Machine Time, 27 May 2011.
- ^ Sanger, David E. (18 February 2013). "China's Army Is Seen as Tied to Hacking Against U.S". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
- ^ "U.S. Charges Five Chinese Military Hackers for Cyber Espionage . . . " Archived 3 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine, 19 May 2014, justice.gov
- ^ "5 in China Army Face U.S. Charges of Cyberattacks" Archived 19 May 2017 at the Wayback Machine, 19 May 2014, NY Times
- ^ "Data from Equifax credit hack could "end up on the black market," expert warns". CBS News. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 2 July 2020. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
- ^ "Four Members of China's Military Indicted Over Massive Equifax Breach". The Wall Street Journal. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 29 May 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
- ^ Borger, Julian (16 April 2020). "China may have conducted low-level nuclear test, US claims". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 29 May 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
- ^ a b Kristensen, Hans M.; Korda, Matt; Johns, Eliana; Knight, Mackenzie (2 January 2024). "Chinese nuclear weapons, 2024". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 80 (1): 49–72. Bibcode:2024BuAtS..80a..49K. doi:10.1080/00963402.2023.2295206. ISSN 0096-3402.
- ^ "Status of World Nuclear Forces". Federation of American Scientists. 31 March 2023. Archived from the original on 29 May 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
- ^ Feng, Emily (19 October 2023). "New Pentagon report claims China now has over 500 operational nuclear warheads". NPR. Archived from the original on 20 October 2023. Retrieved 19 October 2023.
- ^ Kristensen, Hans M.; Korda, Matt; Reynolds, Eliana (4 March 2023). "Chinese nuclear weapons, 2023". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 79 (2): 108–133. Bibcode:2023BuAtS..79b.108K. doi:10.1080/00963402.2023.2178713. ISSN 0096-3402.
- ^ Logan, David C; Saunders, Philip C. (26 July 2023). "Discerning the Drivers of China's Nuclear Force Development: Models, Indicators, and Data". National Defense University Press. Archived from the original on 30 September 2023. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
- ^ a b c Cheng, Dean (2012). "China's military role in space" (PDF). Strategic Studies Quarterly. 6 (1): 55–77. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 November 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022 – via Air University.
- ^ "China's National Defense in the New Era". Andrew S. Erickson: China analysis from original sources. July 2019. Archived from the original on 19 November 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ a b Clark, Stephen (29 January 2021). "China launches military spy satellite trio into orbit". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 23 October 2022.
- ^ "China GPS rival Beidou starts offering navigation data". BBC. 27 December 2011. Archived from the original on 3 February 2012. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
- ^ a b Bruce, Leo (26 November 2021). "China successfully launches tactical military communications satellite". NASA Spaceflight. Archived from the original on 19 November 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ a b Dickinson, General James H. (21 April 2021). United States Space Command Presentation to the Senate Armed Services Committee U.S. Senate (PDF) (Report). Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 August 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ a b c Li, Xiaobing (2024). "Beijing's Military Power and East Asian-Pacific Hot Spots". In Fang, Qiang; Li, Xiaobing (eds.). China under Xi Jinping: A New Assessment. Leiden University Press. p. 266. ISBN 9789087284411. JSTOR jj.15136086.
- ^ Jones, Andrew (22 November 2021). "China launches new Gaofen-11 high resolution spy satellite to match U.S. capabilities". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on 11 February 2024. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ "JianBing 5 (YaoGan WeiXing 1/3) Synthetic Aperture Radar". Sino Defense. 12 November 2007. Archived from the original on 21 April 2008. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
- ^ "The Chinese Maritime Surveillance System". SatelliteObservation.net. 20 September 2016. Archived from the original on 17 March 2022.
- ^ Blizzard, Timothy J. (2016). "The PLA, A2/AD and the ADF: Lessons for Future Maritime Strategy". Security Challenges. 12 (3): 69–70. JSTOR 26465599. Archived from the original on 19 November 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ "Precise orbit determination of Beidou Satellites with precise positioning". Science China. 2012. Archived from the original on 17 June 2013. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
- ^ Dotson, John (15 July 2020). "The Beidou Satellite Network and the 'Space Silk Road' in Eurasia". Jamestown. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
- ^ Smith, Marcia (19 August 2013). "Surprise Chinese Satellite Maneuvers Mystify Western Experts". SpacePolicyOnline. Archived from the original on 28 November 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ Jones, Andrew (27 January 2022). "China's Shijian-21 towed dead satellite to a high graveyard orbit". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on 3 February 2023. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ Yardley, Jim (15 October 2003). "China Sends a Man Into Orbit, Entering the U.S.–Russian Club". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 November 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ Mali, Tariq (18 October 2005). "Shenzhou 6 Taikonauts Achieve Firsts for China". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on 11 February 2024. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ Jones, Andrew (7 November 2021). "China's Shenzhou 13 crew takes its first spacewalk, the country's 1st by a female astronaut". Space.com. Archived from the original on 7 November 2021. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ Stokes, Mark A. (1999). China's Strategic Modernization: Implications for the United States. Diane Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4289-1197-0. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ China plays down fears after satellite shot down Archived 29 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine, AFP via Channelnewsasia, 20 January 2007
- ^ "氢氧爆轰驱动激波高焓风洞". 中国科学院高温气体动力学重点实验室. 17 March 2005. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2008.
- ^ Fisher, Jr., Richard (29 June 2011). "PLA and U.S. Arms Racing in the Western Pacific". International Assessment and Strategy Center. Archived from the original on 31 January 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2012.
It is also possible that during this decade the PLA Navy could deploy initial railgun and laser weapons. It is known that the PLA has invested heavily in both technologies.
- ^ Chen, Laurie; Torode, Greg (5 March 2025). "China maintains defence spending increase at 7.2% amid roiling geopolitical tensions". Reuters. Retrieved 5 March 2025.
- ^ "SIPRI Military Expenditure Database". SIPRI. 28 April 2025. Retrieved 28 April 2025.
- ^ Robertson, Peter. "Military PPP Data". Retrieved 25 July 2025.
- ^ Robertson, Peter (20 September 2021). "The Real Military Balance: International Comparisons of Defense Spending". Review of Income and Wealth. 68 (3). Wiley: 797–818. doi:10.1111/roiw.12536.
- ^ "1988年7月25日,中央軍事委員會決定將《中國人民解放軍進行曲》,定為中國人民解放軍的軍歌。" [July 25, 1988: March of the Chinese People's Liberation Army is designate as the military song of the People's Liberation Army]. Our China Story (in Chinese). 25 July 2021. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ "军歌歌词是怎样变迁的?那些"飘扬的旗帜"" [How did the lyrics of military songs change? Those "Flags Waving"]. China News Service (in Chinese). 16 July 2010. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
- ^ Lee, Lily Xiao Hong; Wiles, Sue (28 January 2015). Biographical Dictionary of Chinese Women, Volume II (0 ed.). Routledge. p. 145. doi:10.4324/9781315719313. ISBN 978-1-317-51562-3.
... situation of their conflicting nationalities by returning to China, where Zheng Lücheng took out Chinese citizenship. ... PRC, Zheng Lücheng was active in his work as a composer; he wrote the music for the Western-style opera Cloud Gazing.
- ^ Wu, Fei (1 October 2009). "Military Parade Marks Anniversary". China Daily. Xinhua. Archived from the original on 9 October 2019. Retrieved 4 November 2009.
- ^ "81 Flag and Other Signs" (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 1 December 2018. Retrieved 4 November 2009.
- ^ "Flag, Emblem and Song of the People's Liberation Army". Xinhua Net News (in Chinese). Xinhua. 23 June 2004. Archived from the original on 11 July 2016. Retrieved 4 November 2009.
- ^ "Uniform of Rocket Force". People's Daily (in Chinese). 1 July 2016. Archived from the original on 4 November 2020. Retrieved 6 July 2016.
Works cited
[edit]- Army Techniques Publication 7-100.3: Chinese Tactics (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, United States Army. 2021. ISBN 9798457607118.
- Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997). The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai Lama. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-21254-1.
- International Institute for Strategic Studies (12 February 2025). The Military Balance 2025. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003630760. ISBN 978-1-003-63076-0.
- Kaufman, Alison A.; Mackenzie, Peter W. (2009). The Culture of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (Report). Marine Corps Intelligence Activity. Archived from the original on 23 June 2024. Retrieved 23 June 2024.
- Pollpeter, Kevin; Allen, Kenneth W., eds. (14 June 2012). The PLA as Organization v2.0 (Report). China Aerospace Studies Institute.
- Saunders, Phillip C.; Ding, Arthur S.; Scobell, Andrew; Yang, Andrew N.D.; Joel, Wuthnow, eds. (2019). Chairman Xi Remakes the PLA: Assessing Chinese Military Reforms. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press. ISBN 978-1070233420.
Further reading
[edit]History
[edit]- Dreyer, Edward L. (1995). China at War: 1901–1949. Pearson Longman. ISBN 9780582051232.
- Fravel, M. Taylor (2019). Active Defense: China's Military Strategy Since 1949. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691210339.
- Li, Xiaobing (2007). A History of the Modern Chinese Army. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 9780813172248.
- Whitson, William W.; Huang, Zhenxia; Chên-hsia, Huang (1973). The Chinese High Command: A History of Communist Military Politics, 1927–71. Praeger. ISBN 978-0333150535.
Present-day
[edit]- 2022 Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China (PDF). Arlington, Virginia: United States Department of Defense. 2022. (China Military Power Report, Annual Report to Congress)
- Chase, Michael S.; Jeffery, Engstrom; Cheung, Tai Ming; Gunness, Kristen A.; Harold, Scott; Puska, Susan; Berkowitz, Samuel K. (2015). China's Incomplete Military Transformation: Assessing the Weaknesses of the People's Liberation Army (PLA). RAND Corporation. ISBN 9780833088307.
- Fisher, Richard D. (2008). China's Military Modernization: Building for Regional and Global Reach. Praeger Security International. ISBN 9780275994860.
- Kamphausen, Roy; Lai, David; Scobell, Andrew (2009). Beyond the Strait: PLA Missions Other Than Taiwan. Strategic Studies Institute. ISBN 9781304886385.
External links
[edit]- Official website
(in English) - Official website (in Chinese)
People's Liberation Army
View on GrokipediaHistorical Development
Origins in Revolutionary Warfare
The origins of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) lie in the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) establishment of independent armed forces amid the Chinese Civil War, beginning with the Nanchang Uprising on August 1, 1927.[10] In this event, CCP-aligned units within the National Revolutionary Army, totaling approximately 20,000 troops under leaders including He Long and Ye Ting, mutinied against Kuomintang (KMT) forces in Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, following the KMT's purge of communists in the Shanghai Massacre earlier that year.[11] The uprising aimed to counter KMT suppression and initiate armed resistance, capturing the city temporarily before withdrawing southward due to counterattacks, with survivors forming the core of the CCP's nascent military.[12] This action marked the birth of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army, emphasizing revolutionary violence to seize power from the KMT government.[3] Subsequent efforts shifted toward rural guerrilla warfare, as urban insurrections proved unsustainable against superior KMT forces. The Autumn Harvest Uprising, launched on September 9, 1927, in Hunan Province under Mao Zedong's leadership, involved peasant militias and defected soldiers—numbering around 5,000—targeting local KMT authorities and landlords to redistribute land and establish soviets.[10] Facing heavy losses, Mao redirected survivors to the Jinggang Mountains on the Hunan-Jiangxi border in October 1927, creating China's first rural revolutionary base area and pioneering tactics of mobile warfare, ambushes, and peasant mobilization to encircle and harass larger enemy formations.[13] This approach, rooted in exploiting terrain and popular support rather than conventional battles, compensated for the Red Army's material deficiencies, with forces growing from scattered bands to over 100,000 by the early 1930s through such asymmetric strategies.[14] Mao Zedong's theory of protracted people's war, formalized in works like "On Protracted War" (1938), codified these origins by advocating three phases: strategic defensive via guerrilla actions, stalemate through expansion of base areas, and counteroffensive once conditions favored decisive engagements.[15] Drawing from empirical failures of urban revolts and successes in rural encirclement campaigns—where the Red Army withstood five KMT "annihilation" drives between 1930 and 1934—this doctrine prioritized political indoctrination, land reform for peasant loyalty, and avoidance of positional warfare until numerical superiority was achieved.[16] By the Long March (1934–1935), which preserved the Red Army's cadre despite 90% losses, these tactics had embedded revolutionary warfare as the PLA's foundational paradigm, enabling survival and eventual dominance over KMT forces by 1949.[17] CCP narratives emphasize mass mobilization as causal to victory, though independent analyses attribute success partly to KMT strategic errors and Japanese invasion diversions, underscoring the doctrine's reliance on internal political cohesion over pure military prowess.[18]Formation and Early People's Republic Era
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) traces its origins to the communist military forces formed on August 1, 1927, during the Nanchang Uprising, when approximately 20,000 communist-aligned soldiers from the National Revolutionary Army mutinied against the Nationalist (Kuomintang) government, establishing the Workers' and Peasants' Revolutionary Army, later redesignated the Red Army.[19] This force, numbering fewer than 30,000 by late 1927 after initial defeats, adopted guerrilla tactics under leaders like Mao Zedong and Zhu De, surviving encirclement campaigns and the Long March (1934–1935), which reduced its strength to around 8,000 survivors who regrouped in Yan'an.[10] During the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945), the Red Army reorganized as the Eighth Route Army and New Fourth Army under a United Front with the Nationalists, expanding to over 900,000 troops by 1940 through peasant recruitment and hit-and-run operations against Japanese forces.[10] In June 1946, as the Chinese Civil War resumed, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) renamed its forces the People's Liberation Army to emphasize national liberation from both Japanese remnants and Nationalist rule, fielding about 1.2 million troops organized into 22 brigades by 1947.564375) The PLA's victory in key campaigns, including the Liaoshen (September–November 1948, capturing 470,000 Nationalist troops) and Pingjin (November 1948–January 1949, isolating Beijing), enabled the CCP to control mainland China by late 1949, with the PLA growing to 4 million personnel through captured equipment and defections.[10] On October 1, 1949, Mao Zedong proclaimed the People's Republic of China (PRC), designating the PLA as the state's official armed forces under CCP control via the Central Military Commission.[20] In the early PRC era, the PLA underwent demobilization and reorganization, reducing from 5.4 million troops in 1949 to 2.8 million by 1953 to support economic reconstruction, while establishing formal branches: the People's Liberation Army Ground Force (predecessor to all services), Navy (founded April 23, 1949), and Air Force (November 11, 1949).[21] Domestically, PLA units enforced land reform (1949–1953), redistributing property from landlords to 300 million peasants and executing or imprisoning over 700,000 in the Campaign to Suppress Counterrevolutionaries (1950–1951), which targeted former Nationalists and perceived threats.[22] Bandit suppression operations (1950–1953) eliminated an estimated 1.2 million insurgents, consolidating CCP rule in rural areas.[10] The Korean War (1950–1953) marked the PLA's first major conventional engagement abroad, with Mao committing the People's Volunteer Army—effectively 19 infantry armies (780,000 troops total) drawn from PLA units—crossing the Yalu River on October 19, 1950, to counter U.S.-led UN advances toward China's border.[23] Motivated by fears of U.S. invasion and Soviet alliance pressures, the intervention halted UN forces at the 38th parallel but incurred heavy casualties—official PRC figures claim 183,000 killed, though estimates range to 400,000 dead or wounded—due to inferior logistics, artillery shortages, and UN air superiority.[24] The war spurred Soviet aid, including MiG-15 jets for the nascent PLAAF, but strained PRC resources, delaying domestic industrialization until the 1953 armistice.[20]Key Conflicts and Internal Disruptions
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) intervened in the Korean War on October 19, 1950, deploying the People's Volunteer Army to support North Korean forces against United Nations troops, marking its first major external conflict after the founding of the People's Republic of China.[25] This involvement stemmed from Mao Zedong's strategic decision to counter perceived U.S. threats near China's border, with PLA units crossing the Yalu River in large numbers despite logistical challenges and inferior equipment. The campaign involved intense offensives, including the encirclement of UN forces, but resulted in heavy Chinese casualties estimated between 180,000 and 400,000 deaths, contributing to the 1953 armistice that stalemated the peninsula.[26] In the Sino-Indian War of 1962, the PLA launched coordinated offensives on October 20 against Indian positions in Aksai Chin and the North-East Frontier Agency, exploiting high-altitude terrain and surprise to overrun forward Indian defenses within days.[27] Chinese forces advanced up to 50 kilometers in some sectors, capturing key passes before declaring a unilateral ceasefire on November 21 and withdrawing from some areas while retaining Aksai Chin control.[27] The conflict highlighted PLA advantages in acclimatization, logistics, and artillery over Indian troops, with reported Chinese casualties around 722 killed compared to over 1,300 Indian deaths, though Indian sources claim higher PLA losses.[28] The Sino-Vietnamese War erupted on February 17, 1979, when the PLA invaded northern Vietnam with approximately 200,000-300,000 troops to punish Hanoi for its incursion into Cambodia and mistreatment of ethnic Chinese, aiming for a limited "lesson" rather than full occupation.[29] Despite initial advances of 10-20 kilometers, PLA units faced fierce resistance from battle-hardened Vietnamese forces, suffering logistical breakdowns, poor coordination, and high casualties estimated at 20,000-28,000 killed, leading to a withdrawal by March 16 after destroying border infrastructure.[30] The poor performance exposed deficiencies in PLA training, equipment, and combined-arms tactics, prompting post-war purges and modernization reforms under Deng Xiaoping.[29] Internally, the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) severely disrupted PLA cohesion, as Mao Zedong mobilized the army to suppress Red Guard factions and restore order, temporarily elevating its political role while fostering factionalism within units.[31] Lin Biao, appointed Mao's successor in 1969 and PLA minister, consolidated military power but allegedly plotted a coup, culminating in his death on September 13, 1971, when his plane crashed in Mongolia during a flight toward the Soviet Union.[32] The incident triggered a massive purge of PLA leadership, removing hundreds of senior officers and disrupting command structures, as Mao sought to reassert civilian control over the military elite.[33] These purges weakened professionalization efforts and contributed to the army's stagnation until post-Mao reforms, with official narratives later framing the event as a counter-revolutionary conspiracy.[32]Post-Mao Reforms and Professionalization
Following Mao Zedong's death in 1976, Deng Xiaoping advanced PLA reforms to prioritize technological modernization and operational efficiency over the Mao-era reliance on mass mobilization and political fervor.[34] These efforts, embedded within the broader "Four Modernizations" agenda, sought to demobilize excess personnel and cultivate a professional officer corps through institutionalized training and merit-based advancement.[35] In 1978, the Central Military Commission linked officer promotions to completion of professional military education, while reinstating retirement regulations to retire aging revolutionary cadres and infuse younger, technically oriented leaders.[35] By 1984, this yielded the retirement of 40 senior officers, escalating to 47,000 by late 1986, which reduced average command ages—for example, military region commanders dropped from 65.3 to 57.1 years between 1982 and 1986.[35] The 1985 reforms marked a pivotal downsizing, slashing active-duty strength by 1 million troops—a 25% reduction concentrated in ground forces—to curb bureaucratic bloat and reallocate human resources to civilian economic development.[36] [37] Structural changes accompanied this: military regions consolidated from 11 to 7, 11 group armies were disestablished, over 4,000 division- and regimental-level units disbanded, and headquarters staffs halved, enabling emphasis on combined-arms integration and non-ground force branches like the navy and air force.[36] Education reforms accelerated professionalization, with the 1985 founding of the National Defense University to deliver advanced instruction in strategy and technology.[35] Policies raised entry and promotion thresholds, boosting specialized military careers among officers—rising 26% in some cohorts—and advanced education rates, which reached 79% among senior officers by 1994.[35] The 1988 "Regulations for Military Service" codified age caps (e.g., 65 for military region commanders), further entrenching merit over seniority, though retention of political commissars preserved CCP oversight.[35] By the early 1990s, these initiatives had yielded a leaner force of approximately 3 million personnel, with younger officers averaging regiment-level ages of 37.2 years and increased focus on high-technology warfare preparation, albeit constrained by limited defense budgets prioritizing economic growth.[36] [35] Outcomes included enhanced training realism and doctrinal shifts toward quality over quantity, setting foundations for subsequent modernization waves.[37]Xi Jinping's Centralization and Recent Reforms
Upon assuming the chairmanship of the Central Military Commission (CMC) in November 2012, Xi Jinping launched an anti-corruption campaign that targeted the People's Liberation Army (PLA), resulting in the investigation and discipline of numerous high-ranking officers to consolidate loyalty and reduce factionalism within the military.[38][39] This effort, described as an "all-around battle" against graft, emphasized vertical control from the CMC and horizontal coordination across branches, with over a dozen senior generals purged by 2015.[40] The campaign's military dimension intertwined with structural reforms announced in 2015, which reduced active-duty personnel by 300,000 and reorganized the PLA's command hierarchy to prioritize joint operations and centralized decision-making.[41] Key changes included the abolition of the seven military regions in favor of five theater commands—Eastern, Southern, Western, Northern, and Central—each focused on specific geographic threats and granted authority over integrated air, sea, land, rocket, and strategic support forces.[42] These "above-the-neck" reforms flattened the command structure, diminished the autonomy of service branches, and enhanced the CMC's direct oversight, aiming to improve combat effectiveness for scenarios like potential conflicts over Taiwan or in the South China Sea.[43] Concurrently, the Second Artillery Force was elevated to the PLA Rocket Force, responsible for nuclear and conventional missiles, while the Strategic Support Force (SSF) was established to handle space, cyber, and electronic warfare capabilities.[44] Further centralization occurred through the creation of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force in 2016, standardizing supply chains across theaters to reduce redundancies and bolster sustained operations.[42] By 2024, Xi oversaw additional restructuring, including the dissolution of the SSF and its reconfiguration into the Aerospace Force, Cyberspace Force, and Information Support Force, intended to achieve information dominance in modern warfare.[45][46] Recent years have seen intensified purges, particularly targeting the Rocket Force amid allegations of corruption and equipment scandals, with its commander and political commissar removed in 2023, followed by the expulsion of multiple senior officers by 2025.[47] In October 2025, two top generals were expelled from the Communist Party and military on corruption charges, continuing Xi's pattern of replacing disloyal or compromised leaders to reinforce personal authority over the PLA.[48] These actions, while disrupting short-term readiness, underscore Xi's prioritization of political reliability over operational continuity, as evidenced by irregular leadership changes affecting at least 15 defense-industrial executives and generals since 2023.[40][47]Political Control and Ideological Foundations
Supremacy of the Chinese Communist Party
The supremacy of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) over the People's Liberation Army (PLA) is a foundational principle of the Chinese military's structure and operations, originating from Mao Zedong's 1938 assertion that "the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party," which underscores the PLA's role as the armed instrument of the CCP rather than a national force independent of partisan control.[49][50] This doctrine ensures that the PLA's primary mission remains the defense of CCP rule, prioritizing political loyalty over purely military professionalism or state sovereignty.[51] Institutionally, this control is exercised through the CCP's Central Military Commission (CMC), chaired by the CCP General Secretary, who holds ultimate command authority, while the parallel state CMC serves as a nominal entity without independent power. The PLA's dual-command system mandates that military unit commanders share authority with political commissars appointed by the CCP, who oversee ideological indoctrination, enforce party directives, and veto operational decisions deemed contrary to party interests.[52] Over 95% of PLA officers are required to be CCP members, with promotions and assignments contingent on demonstrated loyalty, including mandatory participation in political education programs that emphasize "Xi Jinping Thought" as the guiding ideology since 2017. This structure minimizes risks of military autonomy, as evidenced by historical purges, such as those during the Cultural Revolution, where factional PLA elements were subordinated to reassert party dominance. Under Xi Jinping, since assuming CMC chairmanship in 2012, enforcement of CCP supremacy has intensified through anti-corruption campaigns that have disciplined or removed over 100 high-ranking officers by 2023, targeting perceived disloyalty or corruption as proxies for political unreliability, thereby reinforcing centralized party oversight amid military modernization efforts.[53] Recent directives, including a 2025 PLA-wide education campaign, explicitly demand "absolute loyalty" to Xi and the CCP, integrating political reliability metrics into performance evaluations and joint operations training.[54] These measures reflect causal priorities where party control precedes combat effectiveness, limiting PLA adaptability in scenarios requiring initiative independent of CCP directives, as noted in analyses of its rigid hierarchy.[1]Central Military Commission Operations
The Central Military Commission (CMC) serves as the supreme command authority over the People's Liberation Army (PLA), exercising unified leadership on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People's Republic of China. Established under Article 93 of the PRC Constitution, the CMC directs all aspects of military operations, including strategy formulation, force deployment, personnel management, and logistical support, ensuring absolute party control over the armed forces.[55][56] It oversees approximately three million PLA personnel, alongside the People's Armed Police and militia reserves.[57][58] Chaired by Xi Jinping since 2012, the CMC operates through a small leadership core comprising the chairman, two vice chairmen, and several members drawn primarily from senior PLA officers, though recent purges have reduced its size to as few as six full members by mid-2025, reflecting intensified anti-corruption efforts and loyalty enforcement.[58][40] The chairman holds ultimate decision-making authority on critical defense matters, often delegating routine operations to subordinate departments while relying on a network of trusted agents for oversight.[59][60] In crisis scenarios, such as potential conflicts, the CMC becomes the central hub for rapid response, integrating inputs from theater commands and service branches to authorize escalatory actions.[61] Functionally, the CMC manages PLA operations via 15 specialized departments, reformed in 2016 to replace the prior general departments structure, enhancing joint command capabilities and reducing inter-service silos.[62] Key entities include the Joint Staff Department for operational planning and training, the Political Work Department for ideological enforcement and cadre selection, and the Logistics Support Department for supply chain management.[56] These bodies execute directives on active defense strategies, nuclear command, and modernization initiatives, such as integrating informationized warfare elements announced in April 2024.[63][42] Under Xi's reforms since 2015, CMC operations have emphasized centralization, with purges targeting high-ranking officers implicated in corruption—over a dozen CMC members affected since 2012—to eliminate factional influences and bolster combat readiness.[64][65] This has streamlined decision-making but raised concerns among analysts about potential disruptions in operational continuity due to leadership vacuums and heightened emphasis on political reliability over professional expertise.[66][58] The CMC's dual structure—parallel party and state commissions—ensures CCP primacy, subordinating military professionalism to ideological loyalty in all operational contexts.[1]Role of Political Commissars and Loyalty Enforcement
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) maintains a dual-command structure at every level from regiment and above, pairing a military commander responsible for operations with a political commissar tasked with ideological oversight and party loyalty.[67][68] This system, originating in 1927 and reinforced by Mao Zedong after a brief 1930s experiment with unified command led to loyalty issues, ensures the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) absolute leadership over the armed forces.[68] Political commissars, selected from party-member officers with operational experience, hold equal rank to commanders and serve as party secretaries within units, directing party committees that collectively decide major issues.[67][69] Political commissars enforce loyalty through comprehensive political work, including ideological education sessions, monitoring of personnel dossiers for political reliability, and enforcement of party discipline via mechanisms like study groups and internal audits.[1][67] They evaluate commanders and troops for adherence to CCP directives, control promotions and awards based on ideological conformity, and validate operational orders to prevent deviations from party lines.[1][69] In practice, this involves commissars participating in frontline activities and qualifying in military skills, such as passing captain's exams on warships, to maintain credibility while prioritizing political objectives over purely tactical ones.[69][70] Under Xi Jinping, loyalty enforcement has intensified, with directives at the 2013 All-Army Party Building Meeting emphasizing absolute fidelity to the CCP Central Military Commission.[1] New regulations issued in July 2025 by the Central Military Commission reshape political work to demand unwavering loyalty to the Party Center, tasking commissars with grassroots scrutiny, rejection of corruption, and integration of political leadership into operational roles for redundancy and continuity.[71] This approach, while safeguarding against internal threats like the 1935 Zhang Guotao defection, imposes rigid top-down control that limits commander initiative and conflicts with flexible doctrines such as mission command.[71][1] In naval contexts, party standing committees chaired by commissars influence encounters with foreign vessels, ensuring actions align with broader political goals.[69][70]Organizational Structure
High Command and Decision-Making
The Central Military Commission (CMC) of the Chinese Communist Party serves as the supreme military leadership organ of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), exercising unified command over all armed forces, including decisions on strategy, operations, and personnel appointments.[72] Chaired by Xi Jinping since 2012, the CMC operates in a dual structure alongside a nominally parallel state CMC, with the party entity holding ultimate authority due to the principle of party supremacy over state institutions.[6] This arrangement centralizes power in the chairman, who directs major policy through CMC plenary sessions and delegated departments, while the General Office manages routine administration and implementation.[9] The CMC comprises the chairman, typically two vice chairmen (one from military operations and one with political oversight), and around 6-8 members drawn from senior PLA officers, service branch leaders, and party officials, totaling about 11 members as of the 20th Party Congress in 2022.[72] Decision-making emphasizes top-down directives from the chairman, with input from functional departments like the Joint Staff Department for operational planning and the Political Work Department for ideological enforcement, reflecting a hierarchical model where political loyalty to the party supersedes tactical flexibility.[57] This structure, reformed extensively under Xi since 2015, abolished the PLA's seven military regions in favor of five theater commands to streamline joint operations under CMC oversight, aiming to enhance integrated warfare capabilities while reinforcing centralized control.[64] Xi's reforms have intensified personalization of command, reviving a chairman-centric model that bypasses intermediate layers to mitigate factionalism and corruption, as evidenced by the 2015-2016 restructuring that elevated the CMC's role in wartime decision-making and resource allocation.[73] Further adjustments in April 2024 focused on informationized warfare, integrating cyber and space elements under tighter high-command coordination to address perceived gaps in multi-domain operations.[63] However, the system's rigidity—rooted in dual-command with political commissars paralleling operational officers—limits decentralized initiative, contrasting with Western mission command doctrines and potentially constraining adaptability in dynamic conflicts.[1] Recent instability in the high command underscores challenges in maintaining cohesion, with purges of senior figures including CMC Vice Chairman He Weidong and Rocket Force Commander Wang Houbin announced in late 2024 and early 2025, framed officially as anti-corruption drives but signaling Xi's ongoing efforts to eliminate disloyalty or incompetence at the apex.[74] [75] These actions, affecting at least nine generals, have disrupted continuity but reinforced the chairman's dominance, as PLA media emphasized in October 2025 that the military must remain free of "corrupt elements" to ensure combat readiness.[76] Overall, PLA decision-making remains opaque, with empirical assessments from U.S. defense analyses highlighting persistent risks of politicized appointments over merit-based expertise.[6]Theater Commands and Joint Operations
In November 2015, the Central Military Commission (CMC) initiated a major restructuring of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), dissolving the seven military regions established since 1985 and establishing five theater commands (TCs) to prioritize operational effectiveness over administrative silos.[77][78] This reform centralized operational authority under the CMC, assigning service branches (Ground Force, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force) responsibility for training and equipping forces while TCs assumed direct command for joint warfighting across geographic theaters.[63][46] The shift aimed to enable integrated joint operations (IJO) in response to perceived gaps in coordinating multi-domain campaigns, particularly against regional contingencies like a Taiwan invasion or border conflicts.[9][42] The five TCs—Eastern, Southern, Western, Northern, and Central—each oversee a defined area of responsibility (AOR) tailored to strategic priorities, with headquarters locations reflecting operational foci: Eastern TC in Nanjing (Taiwan Strait and East China Sea), Southern TC in Guangzhou (South China Sea and Southeast Asia), Western TC in Lanzhou with a forward base in Urumqi (western frontiers including India and Central Asia), Northern TC in Shenyang (Korean Peninsula and Russian border), and Central TC in Beijing (national capital defense and rapid response).[78][6] Commanders, typically Ground Force generals, lead joint staffs integrating service components, supported by specialized units like intelligence-reconnaissance brigades established in each TC by 2023 to enhance battlefield awareness.[6] As of 2024, the Ground Force maintains five theater armies aligned with these TCs, plus Xinjiang and Tibet military districts for high-altitude operations, totaling around 13 group armies distributed across them.[6] Joint operations doctrine emphasizes "system-of-systems" integration for informatized warfare, formalized in the PLA's Joint Operations Outline (Trial) issued by the CMC around 2017, which outlines campaigns combining firepower strikes, precision attacks, and multi-domain maneuvers under TC leadership.[79][80] Reforms have promoted cross-service exercises, such as those simulating joint targeting and domain operations in varied environments, with observed improvements in command interoperability by 2023, though persistent challenges include Ground Force dominance, limited inter-service trust, and untested combat cohesion.[81][6] U.S. Department of Defense assessments note that while structural changes facilitate joint planning, the PLA's lack of recent large-scale war experience hinders execution against peer adversaries, with exercises often scripted to prioritize political loyalty over tactical realism.[6][9]| Theater Command | Headquarters | Primary AOR and Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Eastern | Nanjing | Taiwan Strait, East China Sea; amphibious and air superiority operations[78][6] |
| Southern | Guangzhou | South China Sea, Southeast Asia; maritime denial and island defense[78] |
| Western | Lanzhou/Urumqi | Western borders (India, Central Asia); high-altitude and long-range strikes[78][7] |
| Northern | Shenyang | Korean Peninsula, Russian border; armored maneuvers and border security[78] |
| Central | Beijing | Capital region; strategic reserve, internal stability, and surge support to other TCs[78][82] |
Specialized Support Forces
The Specialized Support Forces of the People's Liberation Army comprise the Information Support Force, Cyberspace Force, Aerospace Force, and Joint Logistics Support Force, established or restructured to enhance capabilities in information operations, cyber warfare, space domain awareness, and unified logistics. These forces operate at the same hierarchical level as the primary service branches and report directly to the Central Military Commission.[83] [46] The Information Support Force, formed on April 19, 2024, through the dissolution of the Strategic Support Force, focuses on integrating network information systems, command and control infrastructure, and data-driven decision-making across the PLA. It oversees the development and application of military information networks, artificial intelligence for battlefield management, and the Integrated Command Platform to facilitate real-time data fusion and joint operations. This force emphasizes achieving information dominance in modern warfare, supporting C4ISR functions with an estimated emphasis on electronic countermeasures and secure communications.[84] [85] [86] The Cyberspace Force, also established in the 2024 reforms, is responsible for offensive and defensive cyber operations, including network attack capabilities, electronic warfare, and protection of PLA information systems against external threats. It inherits cyber-related assets from the former Strategic Support Force's Network Systems Department, aiming to secure cyberspace superiority in conflicts involving digital domains. Analysts assess its role as critical for disrupting adversary command structures while defending against similar incursions, though specific unit sizes and operational details remain classified.[9] [46] [87] The Aerospace Force handles space operations, managing satellite constellations for reconnaissance, navigation (including BeiDou system enhancements), and communication relays essential for PLA precision strikes and surveillance. Created alongside the other 2024 support forces, it focuses on space-based assets to counter anti-satellite threats and ensure orbital domain control, with responsibilities spanning launch, tracking, and potential weaponization of space platforms. This aligns with PLA doctrines prioritizing space as a warfighting domain.[9] [63] [6] The Joint Logistics Support Force, instituted in 2016 as part of earlier reforms, provides centralized logistics across all PLA branches and theater commands, encompassing supply chains, transportation, medical services, engineering, and maintenance. Headquartered in Beijing with subordinate facilities nationwide, it operates over 10 logistics support bases and integrates civilian resources for wartime scalability, reducing service-specific redundancies and enhancing campaign sustainment. By 2024, it had incorporated advanced technologies like automated warehousing to support high-intensity operations.[83] [6] [63]Service Branches
Ground Force Composition and Roles
The People's Liberation Army Ground Force (PLAGF), the land component of the People's Liberation Army, maintains approximately 965,000 active-duty personnel as of 2023.[6] Following structural reforms initiated in 2015, the PLAGF shifted from a division-centric model to brigade-based formations, emphasizing combined-arms operations and integration with joint theater commands.[6] It is organized under five theater commands—Eastern, Southern, Western, Northern, and Central—plus specialized military districts such as Xinjiang and Tibet, with a total of 13 group armies serving as corps-level headquarters.[6] Each group army typically oversees six combined-arms brigades, alongside supporting units including artillery, air defense, army aviation, special operations forces (SOF), engineer, chemical defense, and sustainment brigades, totaling around 80 combined-arms brigades across the force.[6] Combined-arms brigades vary by type—heavy, medium, or light—with personnel ranging from 4,500 to 5,000 per brigade, designed for multi-dimensional maneuver warfare.[6] Specialized elements include 6 airborne brigades, 11 marine brigades (some transferred to the Navy in 2023), 15 artillery brigades, 13 army aviation brigades, and 3 air assault brigades, enhancing capabilities for rapid deployment and vertical envelopment.[6]| Theater Command | Group Armies | Combined-Arms Brigades |
|---|---|---|
| Eastern | 71st, 72nd, 73rd | 18 (incl. amphibious) |
| Southern | 74th, 75th | 12 (incl. amphibious) + 2 infantry |
| Western | 76th, 77th, Xinjiang (84th), Tibet (85th) | 16 + 3 infantry |
| Northern | 78th, 79th, 80th | 17 |
| Central | 81st, 82nd, 83rd | 18 |
Navy Expansion and Maritime Capabilities
The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has rapidly expanded since the early 2000s, evolving from a green-water force focused on coastal defense to a blue-water navy capable of projecting power beyond the first island chain. As of mid-2024, the PLAN maintains over 370 ships and submarines, surpassing all other navies in numerical terms, with projections estimating growth to 395 platforms by 2025 and 435 by 2030.[6][88] This buildup includes commissioning advanced surface combatants, submarines, and amphibious vessels at an unprecedented rate, supported by China's dominant commercial shipbuilding industry, which possesses capacity approximately 200 times that of the United States.[89] Central to maritime capabilities are aircraft carriers, enabling air superiority and strike operations. The PLAN operates two conventionally powered carriers: Liaoning, commissioned in 2012 after refit from a Soviet hull, and Shandong, launched domestically in 2017 and commissioned in 2019, both utilizing ski-jump takeoffs for J-15 fighters.[6] The third carrier, Fujian, launched in 2022, features electromagnetic catapults and arresting gear for conventional takeoff and landing (CATOBAR) operations, displacing over 80,000 tons and undergoing sea trials as of 2025; it supports fixed-wing fighters alongside rotary-wing aircraft, marking a shift toward greater sortie generation rates.[90][91] Submarine forces underpin deterrence and anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) strategies, with the PLAN fielding 12 nuclear-powered submarines—six Type 094 Jin-class ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) capable of carrying JL-2/3 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and six attack submarines (SSNs)—alongside over 50 diesel-electric boats, many equipped with air-independent propulsion (AIP) for extended submerged endurance.[6][92] Modernization includes development of quieter Type 096 SSBNs and advanced SSNs to enhance second-strike nuclear capabilities and undersea warfare.[93] Surface combatants form the backbone of fleet operations, with over 50 destroyers and frigates in service, including the Type 055 Renhai-class cruisers (displacing 12,000-13,000 tons) equipped with 112 VLS cells for multi-role missiles, phased-array radars, and integrated power systems for directed-energy weapons.[94] Amphibious capabilities have surged with six Type 075 landing helicopter docks (LHDs) and plans for Type 076 variants incorporating electromagnetic catapults for fixed-wing unmanned aircraft, enabling expeditionary assaults and humanitarian operations.[6][91] These assets support operations in the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean, bolstered by overseas facilities like the base in Djibouti.[6]Air Force Modernization and Aerial Dominance
The People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) maintains the Indo-Pacific's largest aviation force, with over 3,150 total aircraft including approximately 2,400 combat types such as fighters and bombers as of late 2024.[6] Modernization efforts, accelerated since 2015 reforms, emphasize indigenous production of fourth- and fifth-generation platforms, transitioning from a numerically dominant but obsolescent fleet reliant on Russian imports to one prioritizing technological parity with advanced militaries.[6] By 2025, the PLAAF fields over 1,300 fourth-generation fighters, with ongoing integration of stealth-capable J-20s and multirole J-16s forming the core of its offensive capabilities.[6] [95] Key platforms include the J-20 fifth-generation stealth fighter, with over 200 units operational by late 2024 and estimates reaching approximately 300 by October 2025 based on production observations.[6] [96] The J-16 advanced multirole fighter exceeds 225 units as of 2023, supporting strike and air superiority missions with enhanced avionics and weaponry.[6] Strategic bombers like the H-6K and H-6N variants, numbering around 200, enable long-range precision strikes with cruise missiles, while the developmental H-20 stealth bomber promises intercontinental reach exceeding 10,000 km.[6] Support assets, including KJ-500 airborne early warning aircraft and Y-20-derived tankers (51 transports and 16 refuelers as of March 2024), extend operational range to the second island chain.[6] PLAAF doctrine has evolved from territorial defense to offensive operations, integrating airpower into joint multi-domain precision warfare to achieve local air superiority, particularly in Taiwan Strait contingencies.[6] This includes anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) strategies leveraging long-range air defenses like HQ-9 and S-400 systems, alongside networked C4ISR for coordinated strikes without reliance on forward refueling in initial phases.[6] Exercises such as JOINT SWORD in April 2023 demonstrate rehearsals for blockades and air dominance over Taiwan, emphasizing rapid deployment and information superiority through manned-unmanned teaming.[6] Despite hardware advances, challenges persist in engine reliability, with domestic WS-15 turbofans addressing past limitations but facing production hurdles exacerbated by supply disruptions from Russia's Ukraine conflict.[6] [97] Pilot training has modernized via centralized programs at Aviation University, yet average flight hours lag behind Western counterparts, and the force lacks recent combat experience, potentially constraining sustained high-tempo operations.[98] [99] Corruption purges in 2023, removing at least 15 senior aviation officials, further delayed equipment integration.[6] These factors, combined with logistical strains for prolonged campaigns, temper assessments of PLAAF's ability to decisively dominate contested airspace against peer adversaries.[6]Rocket Force Missiles and Strategic Deterrence
The People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) oversees China's land-based ballistic missile arsenal, serving as the primary component of its strategic nuclear deterrence posture while also enabling conventional precision strikes for regional contingencies. Established in 2015 from the former Second Artillery Corps, the PLARF maintains a dual-role inventory of nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and conventionally armed shorter-range systems designed for anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) operations, particularly against potential interventions in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea. China's official policy adheres to a no-first-use nuclear doctrine, emphasizing a "lean and effective" minimum deterrent capable of surviving a first strike and retaliating against an adversary's homeland, though recent expansions suggest a shift toward enhanced survivability and counterforce options.[6][100][101] As of mid-2024, the PLARF fields over 400 ICBM launchers, including silo-based DF-5 variants and road-mobile DF-31 and DF-41 systems, with estimates placing China's operational nuclear warhead stockpile above 600, of which a significant portion is assigned to land-based missiles. The DF-41, capable of carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) with ranges exceeding 12,000 kilometers, exemplifies the PLARF's focus on penetrating U.S. missile defenses and targeting the continental United States. New silo construction, including over 300 sites in western deserts detected since 2021, bolsters second-strike assurance by dispersing fixed assets, while mobile launchers enhance survivability against preemptive attacks. Projections indicate China could exceed 1,000 operational warheads by 2030, with ICBM numbers potentially matching U.S. or Russian levels, driven by fissile material production increases and warhead modernization.[6][102][103][104] Conventional PLARF missiles, numbering around 2,500 ballistic and cruise variants, form the world's largest ground-launched arsenal, optimized for saturating defenses in high-intensity conflicts. Short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs) like the DF-15 and DF-16, with ranges up to 1,000 kilometers, target fixed infrastructure in Taiwan, while medium-range DF-21D and intermediate-range DF-26 "Guam killers" incorporate anti-ship capabilities to threaten U.S. carrier strike groups at distances over 4,000 kilometers. Many of these systems are dual-capable, able to swap conventional for nuclear payloads, which complicates escalation dynamics as strikes on them risk miscalculation over nuclear intent. Hypersonic glide vehicles, such as those on the DF-17 (range ~1,800 km) and longer-range DF-27, integrate into the PLARF's deterrence by evading traditional interceptors through maneuverability and speed exceeding Mach 5.[105][106] The PLARF's strategic deterrence relies on command-and-control redundancies, including underground facilities and satellite networks, to ensure retaliatory launches amid disruptions, though vulnerabilities persist from corruption scandals exposed in 2023-2024 that compromised silo integrity and missile reliability. Recent parades and deployments, such as expanded forces in the Tibetan Plateau, signal intent to project power against India and beyond, integrating missile strikes with joint PLA operations. Overall, the PLARF's buildup reflects causal priorities of offsetting U.S. qualitative edges through quantitative depth and technological asymmetry, prioritizing credible threats to homeland survival over assured destruction parity.[107][108][6]Personnel and Human Capital
Recruitment, Conscription, and Retention Policies
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) maintains a legal framework for conscription under the Military Service Law of the People's Republic of China, which mandates military service for male citizens aged 18 to 22, with provisions for female conscription in wartime or specialized roles.[109] In practice, the PLA has not enforced mass conscription since 1949, relying instead on a hybrid system of selective induction and voluntary enlistment to meet annual targets of approximately 700,000 new enlisted personnel out of a total active force of about 2 million.[110] This approach stems from China's large population, which provides a sufficient pool of registrants without requiring universal drafts during peacetime, though all eligible males must register locally.[111] Recruitment emphasizes "precision" methods, utilizing big data, social media campaigns, and career fairs to target high school graduates and college students, with roughly half of recent inductees holding postsecondary education.[112] Since 2021, the PLA has implemented biannual conscription cycles—spring (about 45% of intake) and fall (55%)—to stagger training and enhance unit readiness, replacing the prior single annual cycle.[112] Incentives include tuition reimbursement for college students, preferential post-service employment placements, housing subsidies, and cash bonuses, with recent efforts offering lucrative contracts amid reported shortfalls in voluntary sign-ups.[113] Revisions to conscription regulations in 2023 prioritize recruiting skilled, college-educated individuals (aiming for 70% of the force) and introduce stricter physical and political examinations, including spot checks to address high failure rates linked to sedentary lifestyles and vision issues.[114] Enlisted personnel serve a standard two-year active term, after which they transition to reserves unless extending as non-commissioned officers (NCOs), who can serve up to 30 years in technical or leadership roles under 2022 regulations distinguishing "management" and "skilled" tracks.[112] Retention strategies focus on qualified conscripts converting to NCOs early, improved pay scales, extended leave policies, and promotion opportunities to build a professional core comprising about 850,000 NCOs.[110] Challenges include corruption in local recruitment offices, underutilization of educated volunteers leading to post-term exits, interpersonal frictions between cohort groups, and overall personnel quality gaps, prompting 2023 rules for wartime recalls of veterans and penalties for evasion such as fines up to 50,000 yuan (about $6,760), education bans, and job restrictions.[114][112] These measures underscore PLA concerns over sustaining a high-quality force for modern operations amid demographic shifts and urban youth reluctance.[114]Training, Readiness, and Combat Experience Gaps
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has not participated in major combat operations since the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War, leaving its forces without experience in high-intensity, peer-level conflict.[6] [115] Limited exposures include counterpiracy missions in the Gulf of Aden involving approximately 70 PLAN Marine Corps personnel since 2008, United Nations peacekeeping deployments, and border skirmishes such as the 2020 India-Pakistan clashes, but these involve low operational tempo and do not test modern joint warfare integration or sustained attrition.[6] PLA Special Operations Forces, despite extensive individual training in close-quarters combat and airborne insertions, lack real-world combat validation, contributing to internal recognition of "peacetime disease"—a complacency from unproven doctrines and equipment under fire.[6] Training reforms since the 2010s, including a 2021 system emphasizing actual combat conditions, joint exercises like JOINT SWORD in April 2023 simulating long-range fires against Taiwan, and unscripted aerial intercepts, aim to address scripted deficiencies, yet realism gaps endure.[6] [116] Exercises frequently preordain outcomes, underemphasize complex maneuvers such as close air combat or multi-day sustained operations, and insufficiently incorporate adverse conditions like night fighting or poor weather, limiting adaptation to chaos.[116] The PLA's "Five Incapables" critique identifies persistent commander shortfalls in assessing situations, deploying forces, managing complexity, directing subordinates, and handling contingencies, rooted in peacetime routines over empirical testing.[6] Readiness for extended campaigns reveals logistical and integration vulnerabilities, including weak long-distance sustainment, urban warfare proficiency, and joint operations beyond the First Island Chain.[6] [116] Standardization efforts for rapid mobilization exist, but service parochialism hampers combined arms, while domain-specific gaps—such as the People's Liberation Army Navy's limited deep-water anti-submarine warfare and amphibious lift for Taiwan-scale invasions—constrain scalability.[6] [116] Corruption, evidenced by the 2023 dismissal of at least 15 senior officers and executives, disrupts training cycles and human capital development, where 58-59 percent of recruits exhibit fitness or proficiency shortfalls, amplifying untested technical expertise.[6] [116]| Domain | Key Readiness Gap | Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Logistics | Inadequate long-distance sustainment and Joint Logistic Support Force integration with civilians | High risk of failure in campaigns requiring extended supply lines beyond near seas[6] [116] |
| Joint Operations | Limited coordination and command authority for SOF across services | Constraints on multi-domain responses, especially integrating airborne and naval elements[6] |
| Human Capital | Corruption-driven disruptions and low technical/educational proficiency | Undermines innovation and adaptability in complex scenarios, per internal PLA assessments[6] [116] |
Demographics, Including Women and Minorities
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) maintains an active-duty force of approximately 2 million personnel, with the majority being young adult males primarily from rural and urban areas across China. Conscripts, who number around 700,000, are typically aged 18 to 25, reflecting the two-year service term, while non-commissioned officers (NCOs) have an average age under 30 and officers are older based on rank-specific retirement thresholds. Over 57 percent of personnel hold post-secondary education as of 2020, a figure that has risen steadily due to recruitment policies prioritizing technical skills and college graduates.[117] Ethnic minorities, comprising 55 recognized groups in China, account for 6.75 percent of PLA personnel as of 2020, an increase from 4.4 percent (101,686 individuals) in 2010. This representation remains below the national minority population share of about 8.9 percent, with higher proportions in regions like Yunnan Province (33 percent of local recruits in 2021). Minority servicemembers often serve in dedicated ethnic companies, general units, or postings near their home provinces, and policies provide recruitment relaxations such as age adjustments for doctoral candidates. While all 56 nationalities (including Han) are represented to varying degrees, Han Chinese dominate the officer corps and senior leadership, with ethnic factors influencing promotions through quotas for delegates (6 percent minority officers reported in 2017 party congress data).[117][118] Women constitute 3.8 percent of the total PLA force, down from 5.4 percent in 2000, amid a shift toward a professionalized, all-volunteer-like structure emphasizing quality over quantity. Among 2018 officer cadets, females represented 4.3 percent (240 out of 5,578). Recruitment for women is voluntary and restricted largely to support specialties like communications, medical services, engineering, and foreign languages, available at 15 designated institutions, though limited integration into combat roles has occurred across services including the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force since the 2010s. This expansion aligns with demands for skilled personnel in modern warfare but faces barriers including assignment restrictions and underrepresentation in leadership, with no female officers above lieutenant general rank historically. Exact figures are not officially disclosed by Chinese authorities, and independent analyses highlight persistent gender disparities in combat exposure and promotions.[117][119]Rank Structure and Promotion Dynamics
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) maintains a hierarchical rank structure divided between commissioned officers and enlisted personnel, with ranks standardized across services since the 1988 restoration of formal insignia following the Cultural Revolution abolition. Officer ranks consist of ten levels, from second lieutenant (Shao Wei) to general (Shang Jiang), corresponding roughly to NATO codes OF-1 to OF-10, though senior colonel (Da Xiao) serves as a unique senior field-grade rank without direct Western equivalent. [120] Enlisted ranks, professionalized through reforms in the early 2000s, include eight NCO levels from private first class (Shang Deng Bing) to chief sergeant first class (Yi Ji Jun Shi Zhang, equivalent to OR-9 command sergeant major), emphasizing technical specialization over traditional conscript roles.[121] [122]| Officer Rank (Chinese/Pinyin) | English Equivalent | Typical Command Level |
|---|---|---|
| 上将 (Shang Jiang) | General | Theater/CMC |
| 中将 (Zhong Jiang) | Lieutenant General | Corps/Army Group |
| 少将 (Shao Jiang) | Major General | Division/Corps |
| 大校 (Da Xiao) | Senior Colonel | Regiment/Brigade |
| 上校 (Shang Xiao) | Colonel | Battalion/Regiment |
| 中校 (Zhong Xiao) | Lieutenant Colonel | Company/Battalion |
| 少校 (Shao Xiao) | Major | Company |
| 上尉 (Shang Wei) | Captain | Platoon/Company |
| 中尉 (Zhong Wei) | First Lieutenant | Platoon |
| 少尉 (Shao Wei) | Second Lieutenant | Platoon |
| Enlisted Rank (Chinese/Pinyin) | English Equivalent | NATO Code |
|---|---|---|
| 一级军士长 (Yi Ji Jun Shi Zhang) | Chief Sergeant 1st Class | OR-9 |
| 二级军士长 (Er Ji Jun Shi Zhang) | Chief Sergeant 2nd Class | OR-8 |
| 三级军士长 (San Ji Jun Shi Zhang) | Chief Sergeant 3rd Class | OR-7 |
| 上士 (Shang Shi) | Staff Sergeant | OR-6 |
| 中士 (Zhong Shi) | Sergeant | OR-5 |
| 下士 (Xia Shi) | Corporal | OR-4 |
| 上等兵 (Shang Deng Bing) | Private First Class | OR-3 |
| 列兵 (Lie Bing) | Private | OR-1/2 |
Equipment and Technological Arsenal
Conventional Weapons and Platforms
The People's Liberation Army Army (PLAA) possesses an estimated inventory of 3,800 tanks, comprising third-generation main battle tanks such as the Type 99 and Type 96 series, alongside lighter platforms including the Type 15, which entered service in 2018 to support operations in high-altitude and complex terrain.[6] Development of unmanned tank variants, such as the VT-5 unveiled in 2022 and tested modifications to legacy Type 59 models since 2018, reflects efforts to incorporate remote and autonomous systems into armored formations.[6] Approximately 800 tanks are deployed within the Taiwan Strait theater, prioritizing rapid maneuver and anti-access/area denial capabilities.[6] Infantry fighting vehicles form a core component of mechanized units, with the ZBD-04 serving as the primary tracked platform equipped for amphibious and combined arms operations, while special operations forces utilize specialized CSK-series vehicles enhanced with advanced communications and unmanned aerial vehicle integration.[6] These systems support brigade-level structures, including 80 combined arms brigades across the PLAA's theater commands, emphasizing firepower projection and mobility in joint exercises.[6] Artillery assets total around 7,600 pieces, encompassing self-propelled and towed systems such as the PLZ-07B howitzer, wheeled PCL-181, and truck-launched PCH-191 multiple rocket launchers, with roughly 1,100 positioned in the Taiwan Strait area for long-range precision strikes.[6] The PLAA organizes these into 15 dedicated artillery brigades, three of which operate in the Taiwan Strait theater, and has demonstrated their employment in live-fire drills, including deployments near the PRC-Burma border in November 2023 and the Joint Sword exercise in April 2023 targeting simulated Taiwan contingencies.[6] Modernization of conventional platforms prioritizes integration with electronic warfare, air defense, and networked command systems to enable combined arms operations, with a stated goal of achieving a "world-class" force by 2049; however, anti-corruption campaigns from 2017 to 2023 have potentially delayed equipment upgrades.[6] Small arms advancements include fielding the QBZ-191 assault rifle to special operations units, enhancing close-quarters and precision engagement capabilities.[6] Overall, these platforms underscore a shift toward high-mobility, precision-guided conventional forces suited for regional contingencies, though quantitative estimates remain subject to opaque PRC disclosures and external assessments.[6]| Category | Key Models | Estimated Inventory | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanks | Type 99, Type 96, Type 15 | 3,800 total (800 in Taiwan Strait) | Includes unmanned variants; focus on maneuver and A2/AD |
| IFVs | ZBD-04, CSK-series | Not publicly specified | Supports mechanized brigades and SOF raids |
| Artillery | PLZ-07B, PCL-181, PCH-191 | 7,600 total (1,100 in Taiwan Strait) | 15 brigades; used in joint fires exercises |
Nuclear Forces Buildup and Arsenal Size
The People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) oversees China's nuclear arsenal, which consists primarily of land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and a developing air-launched component. As of mid-2025, independent estimates from the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) and the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists place China's operational nuclear warhead stockpile at approximately 600, with the vast majority stored rather than deployed on launchers.[131][102] The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) concurs, estimating over 600 operational warheads by mid-2024, reflecting a surge of about 100 warheads from prior assessments.[132] These figures derive from satellite imagery of silo construction, fissile material production indicators, and observed missile deployments, though exact counts remain classified and subject to verification challenges due to China's opacity.[133] China's nuclear buildup has accelerated since the early 2020s, driven by PLARF modernization under Xi Jinping's directives for strategic deterrence enhancement. From an estimated 350 warheads in 2020, the arsenal expanded to over 500 by 2023 and reached 600 by 2025, marking the fastest growth among nuclear powers.[134] Key developments include the deployment of over 300 new ICBM silos since 2021, primarily for solid-fueled DF-41 road-mobile and silo-based missiles capable of carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) with ranges exceeding 12,000 km.[6] Sea-based forces feature six Type 094 Jin-class submarines equipped with JL-2 and JL-3 SLBMs, contributing about 72 warheads to the triad, while H-6N bombers are being adapted for nuclear gravity bombs and air-launched cruise missiles.[102] This diversification aims to ensure survivability against preemptive strikes, contrasting with China's historical reliance on minimal deterrence.[131] Projections indicate continued expansion, with DoD forecasting at least 1,000 warheads by 2030 and potentially 1,500 by 2035, enabled by increased plutonium and highly enriched uranium production at facilities like the Jiuquan complex.[6][135] The PLARF's inventory includes around 400 ICBMs—all capable of reaching the continental United States—and ongoing tests of hypersonic glide vehicles for penetration of missile defenses.[136] Despite official adherence to a no-first-use policy, the scale of buildup has prompted U.S. assessments of potential escalatory risks, as transparency remains limited and intent unstated beyond deterrence claims.[137] Recent displays, such as the DF-61 ICBM launcher at China's 2025 Victory Day parade, underscore operational maturation.[138]Cyber Warfare and Electronic Domains
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) reorganized its cyber and electronic warfare structures in April 2024 by dissolving the Strategic Support Force, established in 2015 to centralize space, cyber, and electronic capabilities, and creating the Cyberspace Force (CSF) and Information Support Force (ISF) under the Central Military Commission.[6][87] The CSF, formerly the SSF's Network Systems Department, oversees offensive cyber operations, psychological warfare, technical reconnaissance, and cyberspace defense, operating five theater-aligned bases for signals intelligence and ground-based assets supporting joint exercises.[6][139] The ISF coordinates network information systems, communications, and precision strike support, integrating former SSF assets for command and control across PLA services.[6][84] PLA cyber doctrine emphasizes "intelligentized warfare," incorporating artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and big data to achieve cyberspace superiority in conflict's initial phases, often as part of anti-access/area-denial strategies targeting adversary command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems.[6][140] Cognitive domain operations blend cyber intrusions with psychological influence, using synthetic media like deepfakes—demonstrated in a 2020 PLA incident—to shape adversary perceptions and deter interventions, particularly in Taiwan contingencies.[6] Offensive capabilities include persistent espionage campaigns attributed by U.S. authorities to PLA-linked actors, such as the 2014 indictment of five hackers from PLA Unit 61398 for stealing trade secrets from U.S. corporations via economic espionage and computer intrusions, and the 2020 charges against four members of the PLA's 54th Research Institute for the Equifax breach affecting 148 million individuals.[141][142][143] These operations, often denied by Beijing, focus on acquiring military technologies and disrupting critical infrastructure, with actors like Volt Typhoon—active since 2019—pre-positioning in U.S. sectors including energy and transportation for wartime sabotage.[6][144] Electronic warfare (EW) integrates with cyber efforts to deny electromagnetic spectrum access, employing systems to jam radios, radars, and GPS signals across PLA Army brigades, Air Force Y-9 GX-11 aircraft operational since 2019, and outposts in the Spratly Islands equipped with jamming gear since 2018.[6][145] PLA doctrine prioritizes EW for degrading enemy battlespace awareness, with combined arms units conducting routine jamming and anti-jamming drills, and recent analyses identifying prioritized targets like U.S. Navy carrier group radars and communications in simulated scenarios.[146][147] The CSF's 2025 military parade display featured equipment for battlefield communications, cyber operations, and frontline EW, underscoring integration into joint forces for information dominance.[148][149] While PLA cyber and EW activities have decreased in public attribution since 2021—shifting toward Ministry of State Security actors—they persist as tools for strategic competition, particularly in the Indo-Pacific targeting Taiwan, Vietnam, and Indonesia.[144][150]Space Capabilities and Anti-Satellite Systems
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) Aerospace Force, established on April 19, 2024, as part of a broader reorganization that disestablished the Strategic Support Force, is responsible for integrating and operating China's military space domain, including satellite systems, launch infrastructure, and counterspace capabilities.[151][63] This force anchors its operations across seven primary space bases, managing missions such as intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), navigation, and communication support to PLA joint operations.[152] As of October 2024, the PLA benefits from over 510 ISR-capable satellites equipped with optical, multispectral, radar, and radiofrequency sensors, enabling enhanced detection of U.S. and adversary assets, though total Chinese satellites in orbit exceed 1,015, many integrated with civil systems under military-civil fusion policies.[153][154] PLA space capabilities emphasize denial of adversary advantages in orbit, with rapid expansion in launch cadence—delivering over 260 payloads in 2024 alone—and development of megaconstellations for resilient communications and ISR.[155] These assets support precision strikes and domain awareness but reveal gaps, including vulnerability to counter-ASAT measures and limited deep-space endurance compared to U.S. systems.[155] The U.S. Department of Defense assesses that Beijing views space as a warfighting domain, prioritizing capabilities to contest U.S. reliance on satellites for command, control, and targeting.[6] Anti-satellite (ASAT) systems form a core element of PLA counterspace doctrine, blending kinetic and non-kinetic effectors to degrade or destroy adversary satellites. In January 2007, China conducted a direct-ascent kinetic ASAT test using the SC-19 missile, destroying the defunct FY-1C weather satellite at approximately 865 km altitude and generating over 3,000 trackable debris pieces, demonstrating low Earth orbit (LEO) intercept capability.[156][157] The PLA has since advanced direct-ascent systems, including variants potentially reaching geosynchronous orbit (GEO) at 36,000 km, with the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency estimating operational deployment intent by the mid-2020s.[153] Non-kinetic ASATs include ground-based lasers fielded by the PLA to dazzle, disrupt, or damage satellite sensors and optics, with multiple systems operational against LEO targets and upgrades targeting GEO by the mid-2020s.[158] Co-orbital capabilities involve satellites performing rendezvous and proximity operations (RPO), as evidenced by a 2013 launch of the Shijian-15 satellite, which shadowed another Chinese spacecraft to test grappling or interference mechanisms.[153][159] These systems, including microsatellites and directed-energy weapons, enable reversible effects for escalation control, though proliferation risks space debris and international norms violations, as critiqued in U.S. assessments.[158][6]Operations and Global Posture
Historical Engagements and Border Clashes
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) participated in its first major international engagement during the Korean War, entering combat on October 19, 1950, when elements crossed the Yalu River as the Chinese People's Volunteer Army to support North Korea against United Nations forces.[160] This intervention, driven by Chinese security concerns over U.S. proximity to its border and domestic regime consolidation needs, involved up to 19 infantry armies by late 1950, launching surprise offensives that inflicted heavy casualties on UN troops, such as the encirclement of 30,000 U.S. and South Korean soldiers in November 1950.[161] [162] Fighting continued through brutal winter campaigns until the armistice on July 27, 1953, with Chinese forces suffering an estimated 180,000 to 400,000 deaths due to combat, disease, and attrition, highlighting logistical strains and reliance on mass infantry tactics over mechanized warfare.[162] Border clashes escalated in the 1960s amid territorial disputes. In the Sino-Indian War of October 20 to November 21, 1962, PLA units launched coordinated attacks across the disputed Line of Actual Control, overrunning Indian positions in Aksai Chin and the North-East Frontier Agency with superior preparation and high-altitude acclimatization, capturing key areas within days despite logistical challenges from terrain.[163] Chinese official accounts claim the destruction of 8,853 Indian troops, including 4,885 killed, before a unilateral ceasefire and withdrawal to pre-war lines, attributed to achieving strategic objectives without broader escalation risks.[164] Further skirmishes occurred in 1967, notably at Nathu La pass from September 11 to 15, where PLA artillery and infantry assaulted Indian outposts, resulting in dozens of casualties on both sides amid heightened tensions post-1962.[165] The most perilous border conflict involved the Soviet Union, igniting on March 2, 1969, when a PLA platoon ambushed Soviet border guards on Zhenbao (Damansky) Island in the Ussuri River, killing around 60 Soviets in the initial clash and prompting massive Soviet retaliation with tanks and artillery over subsequent days.[166] [167] This incident, rooted in ideological rifts and territorial claims during the Cultural Revolution, mobilized hundreds of thousands of troops along the 4,000-kilometer frontier, risking nuclear escalation as Soviet leaders considered preemptive strikes on Chinese nuclear sites before de-escalation through talks.[166] Clashes tapered by October 1969, but the episode exposed PLA vulnerabilities in conventional deterrence against a peer adversary, influencing China's later strategic realignments. The PLA's last large-scale ground invasion came in the Sino-Vietnamese War, launched on February 17, 1979, with 200,000-300,000 troops crossing into northern Vietnam to punish Hanoi's invasion of Cambodia and mistreatment of ethnic Chinese, advancing up to 40 kilometers before withdrawing on March 16 after encountering fierce resistance from battle-hardened Vietnamese forces.[168] [29] The offensive stalled due to Vietnamese counterattacks, terrain difficulties, and PLA shortcomings in combined arms operations—most units lacked recent combat experience since Korea—resulting in 20,000-28,000 Chinese deaths and exposing systemic issues like poor training and corruption that prompted post-war reforms.[168] [169] These engagements underscore the PLA's historical pattern of limited, punitive operations focused on border defense and regional influence, with minimal overseas power projection until recent decades.South China Sea and Taiwan Strait Activities
The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has conducted extensive patrols and operations in the South China Sea to enforce China's territorial claims, including the construction and militarization of artificial islands. Between 2013 and 2016, China dredged and expanded seven outposts in the Spratly Islands, covering approximately 3,200 hectares with harbors, runways capable of accommodating fighter jets, anti-ship missile systems, and radar installations.[170][171] By 2022, the United States Indo-Pacific Command assessed that three of these islands—Subi Reef, Mischief Reef, and Fiery Cross Reef—were fully militarized with deployed fighter aircraft and missile batteries.[172] These facilities enable sustained PLAN presence and power projection, supporting surveillance and rapid response capabilities across the region.[173] PLAN vessels have engaged in frequent confrontations with Philippine forces at contested features like Second Thomas Shoal and Scarborough Shoal. On June 17, 2023, Chinese Coast Guard ships, supported by PLAN assets, rammed Philippine resupply boats, resulting in a Philippine Navy SEAL losing a thumb to a collision.[174] Similar incidents escalated in 2024 and 2025, including water cannon attacks and vessel blockades during Philippine rotation and resupply missions, with reports of over 100 Chinese vessels deploying in August 2025 near Second Thomas Shoal.[175][176] Confrontations with Vietnam have involved PLAN and Coast Guard harassment of fishing vessels in the Paracel Islands, such as a September 29, 2024, incident where Chinese vessels pursued Vietnamese boats.[177] These actions align with China's "gray zone" tactics, blending maritime militia, coast guard, and naval forces to assert control without full-scale conflict.[171] In the Taiwan Strait, the PLA has intensified military exercises and incursions, particularly through the Eastern Theater Command, to deter Taiwanese independence and respond to perceived provocations. Following U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan on August 2, 2022, the PLA launched large-scale drills encircling the island, involving over 100 aircraft and 40 warships, marking the highest monthly activity recorded.[178] In May 2024, exercises after Taiwan's presidential inauguration deployed 111 aircraft and 46 naval vessels, with 82 aircraft crossing the median line.[179] Early 2025 saw record crossings, including 59 PLA aircraft sorties on March 21, with 43 breaching the median line, and the "Strait Thunder-2025A" drill on April 1–2 simulating blockades and strikes.[180][181] December 2024 maneuvers involved over 130 aircraft sorties and dozens of vessels from December 9–11, focusing on multi-domain coordination.[182] These operations, often unannounced, normalize high-tempo presence and test integrated joint firepower, though assessments note gaps in real combat interoperability.[183] PLAN carrier groups, including the Liaoning and Shandong, have transited the South China Sea for dual-carrier operations, as demonstrated in October 2024, enhancing blue-water training and deterrence against U.S. freedom of navigation operations.[91][184] Such activities underscore the PLA's shift toward sustained forward presence, amid criticisms from regional states and the U.S. of coercive expansionism, though Chinese state media frames them as defensive sovereignty patrols.[185][186]Overseas Deployments, Basing, and Peacekeeping
The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) initiated its first sustained overseas deployment in December 2008 with escort task forces to the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia, authorized by United Nations Security Council resolutions to combat piracy threatening commercial shipping lanes critical to China's energy imports and trade.[187] By October 2025, the PLAN had dispatched its 48th such task group, consisting typically of a destroyer, frigate, and replenishment ship, with rotations averaging six to eight months and cumulative deployments exceeding 40 task forces, enabling the escort of over 7,000 vessels and deterrence of hundreds of piracy incidents.[188] [189] These operations have provided the PLAN with practical experience in blue-water logistics, command-and-control at distance, and interoperability with foreign navies, while advancing China's narrative of responsible global security contributions amid underlying motives to secure sea lines of communication (SLOCs).[190] In terms of basing, the PLA maintains one formal overseas military facility at the PLA Support Base in Djibouti, established in 2017 as China's inaugural permanent outpost abroad, hosting up to 2,000 personnel and supporting naval rotations, logistics, and limited ground training in the Horn of Africa region proximate to key chokepoints like the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.[6] [191] This base facilitates rapid response for noncombatant evacuations, as demonstrated in operations from Libya in 2011 and Yemen in 2015, and aligns with a broader strategy emphasizing "dual-use" facilities—civilian ports or infrastructure convertible for military logistics—over traditional bases to minimize diplomatic friction while expanding access.[192] Potential dual-use sites include Cambodia's Ream Naval Base, where Chinese funding and PLA Navy visits have raised concerns of de facto access, and exploratory interests in Pakistan's Gwadar port under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, though no additional formal bases have been confirmed as of 2025; U.S. assessments indicate Beijing prioritizes such arrangements for wartime sustainment and power projection without overt colonization.[193] [194] [195] The PLA has participated in United Nations peacekeeping operations (UNPKO) since 1990, evolving from observer roles to troop contributions, with over 50,000 personnel cumulatively deployed by 2025, positioning China as the largest contributor among the Permanent Five Security Council members despite ranking lower overall (approximately 2,200-2,500 troops as of early 2025) compared to leading providers like Nepal and Bangladesh.[6] [196] Key deployments include engineering units in South Sudan (UNMISS), infantry battalions in Mali (MINUSMA until 2023), and police and medical teams across missions in Lebanon (UNIFIL), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), and Darfur (UNAMID/UNITAMS), where PLA contingents have focused on infrastructure construction, medical aid, and force protection amid asymmetric threats.[197] These engagements enhance PLA operational familiarity with multinational environments, test equipment in austere conditions, and bolster China's soft power through claims of "responsibility," though critics note selective participation avoiding missions conflicting with Beijing's geopolitical interests, such as those involving Taiwan recognition.[198] Casualties, including 24 fatalities as of 2023, underscore risks but also domestic propaganda value in portraying the PLA as a global stabilizer.[199]Budget, Resources, and Economic Underpinnings
Expenditure Trends and Official vs. Actual Figures
China's official defense budget for the People's Liberation Army (PLA), announced annually by the National People's Congress, has grown consistently in nominal terms, reflecting sustained emphasis on military modernization. In 2023, the budget was set at 1.55 trillion RMB (approximately $225 billion USD at prevailing exchange rates), rising 7.2% to 1.67 trillion RMB ($232 billion) in 2024 and another 7.2% to 1.78 trillion RMB ($247 billion) in 2025.[200][6] This marks a shift from double-digit annual increases common until the mid-2010s to single-digit growth amid slower economic expansion, with real (inflation-adjusted) growth averaging about 6% from 2013 to 2023.[6] Official figures represent roughly 1.2% of GDP, though this metric obscures the budget's opacity, as breakdowns for personnel, operations, procurement, and research are not publicly detailed.[201] These announced totals significantly understate actual PLA-related expenditures, which exclude major categories such as research and development (R&D), paramilitary forces (including the People's Armed Police and China Coast Guard), space programs (e.g., $14 billion allocated in 2023), foreign arms acquisitions (e.g., $1.7 billion for Russian helicopters), internal security funding ($32 billion in public security for 2023), and military-civil fusion (MCF) initiatives blending civilian and defense resources.[6] Local government contributions, state-owned enterprise subsidies, and dual-use technologies further evade central budget reporting, enabling hidden allocations for advanced domains like cyber, nuclear expansion, and overseas basing (e.g., Djibouti).[6][202] Independent estimates adjust for these omissions, placing actual 2024 spending at $314 billion according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), which incorporates paramilitary and some R&D elements.[203] The U.S. Department of Defense assesses a broader range of $330–450 billion for 2024, implying 40–90% above official figures, based on modeling off-budget items and historical patterns of underreporting.[6] Higher projections, such as $471 billion from academic analyses incorporating purchasing power parity (PPP) adjustments for lower Chinese input costs, underscore the challenges in cross-national comparisons but align with evidence of prioritized investments in high-end capabilities.[204] Such variances highlight systemic non-transparency in Chinese budgeting, contrasting with detailed disclosures in Western militaries and complicating global threat assessments.[201]Modernization Funding and Technology Acquisition Methods
The People's Liberation Army's modernization efforts are primarily funded through allocations from China's official defense budget, which reached RMB 1.78 trillion (approximately $246.5 billion) in 2025, though this figure excludes significant off-budget expenditures such as research and development (R&D) funded by state-owned enterprises and local governments.[200] A key mechanism is the military-civil fusion (MCF) strategy, formalized under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to integrate civilian technological advancements into military applications, enabling the PLA to draw on vast civilian sector investments without direct military outlays.[205] This approach mobilizes resources across dual-use technologies, with MCF oversight committees directing civilian firms to support PLA priorities like advanced semiconductors and hypersonics, effectively subsidizing military R&D through economic development channels.[6][206] Technology acquisition for modernization combines domestic innovation, licit foreign purchases, and illicit methods, with the latter playing a disproportionately large role due to gaps in indigenous capabilities. Domestically, the PLA relies on state-owned defense conglomerates and MCF-driven R&D, where nine major enterprises supply the bulk of equipment through reverse engineering and iterative improvements on imported designs.[207] Foreign arms imports, historically dominated by Russia (e.g., Su-27 fighters and S-300 systems in the 1990s-2000s), have declined to under 10% of procurement by the 2020s as Beijing prioritizes self-reliance, though costs for such imports remain embedded in the equipment budget line.[208] Illicit acquisition via espionage and intellectual property (IP) theft constitutes a core method, with the CCP and PLA systematically exploiting cyber intrusions, insider recruitment, and talent recruitment plans to obtain sensitive technologies in areas like aerospace, propulsion, and quantum computing.[209][210] Cyber-enabled theft targets U.S. and allied firms for blueprints and trade secrets, accelerating PLA platforms like the J-20 stealth fighter through stolen designs, while traditional espionage involves PLA-linked operatives and joint ventures enforcing technology transfers.[211][212] These methods bypass the high costs and risks of independent R&D, enabling rapid prototyping but exposing systemic dependencies on external innovation amid opaque procurement figures that obscure true expenditures.[6][213]Systemic Corruption and Resource Misallocation
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has faced persistent allegations of systemic corruption, characterized by bribery, embezzlement, and pay-for-promotion schemes that undermine operational effectiveness. Since the 1990s, corruption has involved senior officers exchanging ranks and contracts for personal gain, with notable cases including former Central Military Commission vice-chairmen Xu Caihou and Guo Boxiong, who were implicated in vast networks of graft involving billions in diverted funds before their respective convictions and deaths in the mid-2010s.[214][215] These scandals revealed practices such as officers demanding bribes equivalent to years of salary for promotions, fostering a culture where loyalty to patrons superseded merit.[53] Under Xi Jinping's anti-corruption campaigns, purges have intensified, yet their scale suggests entrenched issues rather than eradication. Between 2023 and 2025, investigations targeted the Rocket Force and other branches, expelling at least nine generals from the National People's Congress in late 2023 and ousting additional high-ranking officers, including Miao Hua in January 2025 and He (a senior commander) in October 2025, on charges of corruption and bribery.[216][217][218] The U.S. Department of Defense's 2024 report on Chinese military developments noted that corruption cases have affected every PLA service, eroding confidence in leadership and procurement integrity, with procurement scandals involving falsified equipment deliveries and kickbacks from suppliers.[6][219] This corruption has led to significant resource misallocation, diverting funds intended for modernization into private enrichment and resulting in subpar military capabilities. Resources earmarked for advanced weapons systems, such as missiles and submarines, have been siphoned through embezzlement in procurement chains, yielding inferior or nonexistent hardware while inflating reported inventories.[220][221] Analysts attribute this to opaque budgeting and politicized oversight, where party loyalty incentivizes cover-ups over accountability, exacerbating inefficiencies like inadequate training and maintenance.[222] The persistence despite repeated purges indicates structural flaws, including the PLA's integration with the Chinese Communist Party, which prioritizes ideological control and personal networks over transparent resource allocation.[223][224]Controversies, Criticisms, and Strategic Realities
Internal Weaknesses: Politicization, Purges, and Inefficiencies
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) operates fundamentally as the armed wing of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), prioritizing political loyalty over operational professionalism, with dual command structures featuring military commanders alongside political commissars who enforce ideological conformity. This politicization manifests in mandatory ideological education campaigns, such as the 2025 initiative targeting top brass to instill unwavering allegiance to CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping, which subordinates tactical decision-making to party directives and discourages independent military judgment. New military regulations formalized in 2025 further entrench this by tying promotions to demonstrated Party loyalty and expanding political oversight, potentially stifling initiative and fostering a culture where dissent risks career-ending repercussions.[54][225][9] Xi Jinping's anti-corruption campaigns have triggered extensive purges within the PLA, ostensibly to root out graft but often revealing deeper factional struggles and loyalty tests, with significant disruptions beginning in the Rocket Force in 2023. The abrupt removal of Rocket Force commander Li Yuchao and political commissar Xu Zhongbo in July 2023, followed by the expulsion of nine senior generals from the CCP in October 2025, exemplifies this wave, which has hollowed out command echelons and delayed strategic programs like missile silo construction due to suspected sabotage or embezzlement. These purges, extending to former defense ministers Li Shangfu and Wei Fenghe investigated for corruption in 2023-2024, have created leadership vacuums, with irregular appointments prioritizing personal ties to Xi over expertise, as seen in the rapid elevation of figures like Zhang Youxia amid ongoing high command infighting. While framed as purifying the force, such actions signal Xi's insecurity over potential disloyalty, exacerbating turnover in critical units responsible for nuclear deterrence and conventional strike capabilities.[226][227][74] Resulting inefficiencies compound these issues, as politicization and purges foster systemic corruption, erode training quality, and undermine combat readiness, with reports of missiles filled with water instead of fuel due to graft in procurement chains. The U.S. Department of Defense's 2024 assessment highlights how 2023 corruption scandals halted PLA Rocket Force modernization, diverting resources from operational upgrades to internal purges and retraining, while persistent factionalism impairs joint exercises and doctrinal implementation. Structural rigidities, including overemphasis on loyalty oaths over realistic simulations, contribute to deficiencies in real-world proficiency, as evidenced by the PLA's reliance on scripted maneuvers that fail to replicate high-intensity conflict, further slowed by embezzlement scandals affecting equipment maintenance across services. Despite Xi's directives for anti-corruption to enhance war-fighting capacity, these weaknesses persist, with no measurable progress in reducing graft's drag on effectiveness as of late 2025.[228][229][51]External Threats: Expansionism, Espionage, and Human Rights Roles
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has pursued territorial expansion in the South China Sea through the construction and militarization of artificial islands on seven disputed features since 2013, deploying anti-ship missiles, fighter jets, and radar systems to assert control over international shipping lanes vital to global trade.[230] These actions, including regular patrols by PLA Navy vessels and aircraft since 2015, have escalated tensions with neighboring states like the Philippines and Vietnam, enabling de facto dominance over approximately 90 percent of the sea's area claimed under the "nine-dash line."[6] In the Taiwan Strait, the PLA has intensified military pressure, conducting large-scale exercises simulating blockades and invasions, with PLA aircraft crossing Taiwan's median line over 1,000 times in 2023 and deploying more than 125 warships in encirclement drills in May 2024.[231] Along the India border, PLA forces engaged in deadly clashes in the Galwan Valley on June 15, 2020, resulting in at least 20 Indian and an undisclosed number of Chinese casualties, followed by infrastructure buildup including villages and roads in disputed Ladakh territory.[232] PLA-linked espionage constitutes a major external threat, primarily through state-sponsored cyber operations targeting intellectual property and military secrets. In May 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted five members of PLA Unit 61398 for hacking into U.S. corporations, stealing trade secrets worth billions in industries like nuclear power and solar technology to benefit Chinese state-owned enterprises.[141] The Federal Bureau of Investigation attributes much of China's cyber intrusions to PLA-affiliated actors, estimating annual U.S. economic losses from such theft at $225-600 billion, including blueprints for advanced weaponry and commercial aviation tech.[233] These operations, often conducted via advanced persistent threats (APTs) traced to PLA strategic support forces, extend to traditional espionage, with PLA officers recruiting insiders in U.S. defense firms and research institutions to exfiltrate dual-use technologies.[234] The PLA's roles in human rights suppression amplify external threats by enforcing domestic control in contested regions, projecting an image of unyielding authoritarianism. In Xinjiang, PLA units under the Western Theater Command provide logistical support and border security for internment facilities detaining over 1 million Uyghurs and other Muslims since 2017, contributing to documented genocide and crimes against humanity including forced labor and sterilization.[235] [236] In Tibet, the PLA has maintained a heavy presence since the 1950 invasion, suppressing uprisings such as the 1959 revolt with artillery bombardments that killed tens of thousands, and continues to oversee military districts enforcing restrictions on religious practices and movement.[237] During the 2019-2020 Hong Kong protests, the PLA's garrison of 12,000 troops demonstrated readiness for intervention, conducting exercises signaling potential deployment to crush pro-democracy movements, though primary suppression fell to paramilitary forces.[238] These activities, integrated into the Chinese Communist Party's stability maintenance doctrine, deter international criticism through implied military coercion.[239]Assessments of Effectiveness and Global Comparisons
Assessments of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) reveal a force that has undergone rapid modernization since the early 2010s, expanding capabilities in areas such as missile systems, naval tonnage, and integrated air defenses, yet persistent structural weaknesses undermine its operational effectiveness.[6] [240] The PLA's lack of recent combat experience—its last major conflict being the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War—limits the validation of reforms in real-world conditions, with training exercises often criticized for scripting and lack of realism that fail to replicate adversarial stress.[241] Corruption scandals, including high-level purges of at least nine generals from the national legislative body in 2023-2024, have exposed procurement fraud, equipment quality issues, and resource misallocation, eroding trust in systems like the Rocket Force's missile reliability.[216] [242] Politicization, where loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party supersedes merit-based command, further hampers initiative and joint operations, as evidenced by ongoing anti-corruption campaigns under Xi Jinping that prioritize control over professionalization.[53] [221] In global comparisons, the PLA ranks third in overall military strength indices behind the United States and Russia, boasting the world's largest active-duty force of approximately 2 million personnel and superior quantities in domains like artillery and short-range ballistic missiles.[243] [244] However, it trails the U.S. military in qualitative metrics, including combat-tested doctrine, global logistics networks, and alliances that enable power projection beyond the Asia-Pacific theater.[245] The U.S. maintains advantages in stealth aircraft, carrier strike groups, and cyber-offensive tools, while the PLA excels in anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) strategies suited to regional contingencies like a Taiwan blockade, where proximity and missile barrages could challenge U.S. intervention.[245] [6] Against Russia, the PLA surpasses in naval displacement and economic scale but lags in nuclear triad maturity and expeditionary experience, as Russia's Ukraine operations highlight vulnerabilities in combined arms that the PLA has yet to fully address.[246] Compared to India, border clashes since 2020 demonstrate PLA logistical strains in high-altitude terrains despite numerical edges, underscoring gaps in sustainment over extended conflicts.[240] Overall, while the PLA's investments—projected at $231 billion officially in 2024, likely higher—position it as a peer competitor regionally, systemic issues like unproven interoperability and dependence on imported technologies constrain its ability to project decisive force globally.[57] [247]Doctrine, Symbols, and Cultural Elements
Evolving Military Doctrine and Strategy
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) originated with Mao Zedong's doctrine of people's war, emphasizing protracted conflict, guerrilla tactics, and mass mobilization to offset technological inferiority against invaders, as articulated in Mao's 1938 essay "On Protracted War." This approach prioritized political mobilization and human waves over advanced weaponry, reflecting China's resource constraints during the Chinese Civil War and Korean War.[248] However, defeats in the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War exposed limitations in conventional capabilities, prompting Deng Xiaoping's 1980s reforms to shift toward limited, high-technology warfare focused on border defense.[6] Post-Cold War assessments, particularly lessons from the 1991 Gulf War and 1999 NATO intervention in Kosovo, drove further evolution toward "informatized" warfare, where information dominance enables precision strikes and network-centric operations. In 1993, Jiang Zemin outlined the goal of "winning local wars under high-tech conditions," emphasizing integrated mechanized forces with emerging C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) systems.[249] By 2004, under Hu Jintao, doctrine advanced to "winning local wars under informatized conditions," incorporating joint operations across services to counter U.S. intervention in regional contingencies like Taiwan.[6] The 2015 China's Military Strategy white paper formalized "active defense" as preemptive deterrence and rapid response, prioritizing anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities such as ballistic missiles and submarines to deter naval blockades in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea.[250] Xi Jinping's tenure since 2012 has accelerated this trajectory under the "strong army dream," integrating informatization with "intelligentization" driven by artificial intelligence, big data, and autonomous systems. The 2015 military reforms restructured the PLA into five theater commands for joint operations, reducing service silos and enhancing campaign-level integration, as evidenced by increased exercises like the 2023 Joint Sword drills simulating Taiwan invasion scenarios.[6] Doctrine now emphasizes multi-domain operations, including cyber, space, and electromagnetic spectrum dominance, to achieve "system destruction warfare" targeting enemy command nodes rather than fielded forces.[248] By 2021, PLA writings highlighted "intelligent warfare" as the future paradigm, fusing human-machine collaboration for decision superiority, though implementation lags due to technological dependencies on foreign components and unproven integration at scale.[251] Recent developments, including the 2024 creation of the Information Support Force, underscore a shift toward cognitive domain operations, where psychological and informational warfare disrupts adversary will alongside kinetic effects.[252] U.S. Department of Defense assessments note the PLA's focus on 2027 and 2035 milestones for regional superiority, but persistent challenges like corruption and interoperability gaps temper doctrinal ambitions, as seen in 2023 purges of senior Rocket Force leaders undermining missile reliability.[6] Overall, the evolution reflects causal adaptation to perceived U.S. threats, prioritizing asymmetric counters over symmetric parity, though empirical tests remain limited to simulations and border skirmishes.[42]Insignia, Anthem, and Ceremonial Practices
The emblem of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) consists of a red five-pointed star outlined in yellow, enclosing the Chinese characters "八一" (Bā Yī), denoting August 1, the date of the PLA's founding in 1927 during the Nanchang Uprising.[253] This symbol appears on official seals, documents, and uniforms, symbolizing the military's revolutionary origins under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The PLA flag, adopted in 1949, features a red field with a yellow star in the upper hoist and the "八一" characters below it, serving as the war flag for all branches. Branch-specific flags incorporate the PLA flag's elements with additional symbols: the Ground Force flag adds crossed sword and laurel branches; the Navy includes an anchor; the Air Force a pair of wings; the Rocket Force missile motifs; and newer branches like Aerospace, Cyberspace, Information Support, and Joint Logistics, which received updated flags on August 1, 2025, to reflect their roles in modern warfare.[254] Rank insignia for PLA personnel, standardized since 1988 with revisions in 2007 and 2015, use shoulder boards and sleeve stripes featuring stars, bars, and branch-specific emblems such as bayonets for Ground Force or anchors for Navy, distinguishing officers from enlisted ranks across 10 officer grades and multiple non-commissioned levels.[120] These insignia emphasize hierarchical command under CCP political oversight, with pips and wreaths denoting seniority. The official anthem of the PLA, titled "March of the People's Liberation Army" (中国人民解放军进行曲), was composed by Zheng Lücheng with lyrics by Gong Mu in 1939, originally as the "Eighth Route Army March" during the Second Sino-Japanese War.[255] It was redesignated as the PLA's military anthem by the Central Military Commission on July 25, 1988, with lyrics extolling forward march under the sun, treading the motherland's soil, bearing national hope, and embodying an invincible force loyal to the CCP. The anthem is performed at official ceremonies, parades, and enlistments, reinforcing ideological commitment over nationalistic elements, as its content prioritizes Party leadership.[256] Ceremonial practices in the PLA center on loyalty to the CCP, exemplified by the enlistment oath required under the Military Service Law, where servicepersons pledge obedience to Party commands, discipline, and mission fulfillment, a stipulation reinforced in 1981 to counter perceived deviations and updated in 2025 regulations emphasizing "conscious discipline."[109][257][258] The PLA Honor Guard Battalion, established in 1952, conducts state funerals, flag-raising at Tiananmen Square (transferred to PLA control in 2018), and 21-gun salutes using synchronized artillery protocols practiced rigorously for precision. Salutes follow a palm-down hand gesture to the temple, akin to U.S. protocol, rendered indoors without headgear and outdoors with, during marches or when reporting to superiors.[259] Major ceremonies include annual military parades on Army Day (August 1), National Day (October 1), and Victory Day (September 3), evolving from guerrilla-style displays in the 1940s to high-tech showcases of equipment like missiles and aircraft since the 1984 parade, serving dual purposes of internal morale boosting and strategic signaling.[260] These events feature goose-step marching by the Honor Guard, flyovers, and troop reviews, with participation from all branches to demonstrate unity and modernization, though critics note their role in projecting Party control rather than combat readiness.[261]References
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:China_Emblem_PLA.svg











