Hubbry Logo
ProgressivismProgressivismMain
Open search
Progressivism
Community hub
Progressivism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Progressivism
Progressivism
Progressivism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of a series on
Progressivism
Movements
Ideas
Variants
Ideologies
Activists
Commentators
Intellectuals
Politicians
Literature
Organizations
Media
By region
Related

Progressivism is a left-leaning political philosophy and reform movement that seeks to advance the human condition through social reform.[1] Adherents hold that progressivism has universal application and endeavor to spread this idea to human societies everywhere. Progressivism arose during the Age of Enlightenment out of the belief that civility in Europe was improving due to the application of new empirical knowledge.[2]

In modern political discourse, progressivism is often associated with social liberalism,[3][4][5] a left-leaning type of liberalism, and social democracy.[6][7] Within economic progressivism, there is some ideological variety on the social liberal to social democrat continuum, as well as occasionally some variance on cultural issues; examples of this include some Christian democrat and conservative-leaning communitarian movements.[8][9] While many ideologies can fall under the banner of progressivism, both the current and historical movement are characterized by a critique of unregulated capitalism, desiring a more active democratic government to take a role in safeguarding human rights, bringing about cultural development, and being a check-and-balance on corporate monopolies.[6][7]

History

[edit]

From the Enlightenment to the Industrial Revolution

[edit]

Immanuel Kant identified progress as being a movement away from barbarism toward civilization.[10] 18th-century philosopher and political scientist Marquis de Condorcet predicted that political progress would involve the disappearance of slavery, the rise of literacy, the lessening of sex inequality, reform of prisons, which at the time were harsh, and the decline of poverty.[11]

Part of a series on
Liberalism
History
Principles
Schools
Intellectuals
Politicians
Organizations
Regional variants
Related topics

Modernity or modernisation was a key form of the idea of progress as promoted by classical liberals in the 19th and 20th centuries, who called for the rapid modernisation of the economy and society to remove the traditional hindrances to free markets and the free movements of people.[12]

In the late 19th century, a political view rose in popularity in the Western world that progress was being stifled by vast economic inequality between the rich and the poor, minimally regulated laissez-faire capitalism with out-of-control monopolistic corporations, intense and often violent conflict between capitalists and workers, with a need for measures to address these problems.[13] Progressivism has influenced various political movements. Social liberalism was influenced by British liberal philosopher John Stuart Mill's conception of people being "progressive beings."[14] British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli developed progressive conservatism under one-nation Toryism.[15][16]

In France, the space between social revolution and the socially conservative laissez-faire centre-right was filled with the emergence of radicalism which thought that social progress required anti-clericalism, humanism, and republicanism. Especially anti-clericalism was the dominant influence on the centre-left in many French- and Romance-speaking countries until the mid-20th century. In Imperial Germany, Chancellor Otto von Bismarck enacted various progressive social welfare measures out of paternalistic conservative motivations to distance workers from the socialist movement of the time and as humane ways to assist in maintaining the Industrial Revolution.[17]

In 1891, the Roman Catholic Church encyclical Rerum novarum issued by Pope Leo XIII condemned the exploitation of labor and urged support for labor unions and government regulation of businesses in the interests of social justice while upholding the property right and criticising socialism.[18] A progressive Protestant outlook called the Social Gospel emerged in North America that focused on challenging economic exploitation and poverty and, by the mid-1890s, was common in many Protestant theological seminaries in the United States.[19]

Early 20th-century progressivism included support for American engagement in World War I and the creation of and participation in the League of Nations,[20][21] compulsory sterilisation in Scandinavia,[22] and eugenics in Great Britain,[23] and the temperance movement.[24][25] Progressives believed that progress was stifled by economic inequality, inadequately regulated monopolistic corporations, and conflict between workers and elites, arguing that corrective measures were needed.[26]

Contemporary political conception of the philosophy

[edit]

In the United States, progressivism began as an intellectual rebellion against the political philosophy of Constitutionalism[27] as expressed by John Locke and the Founding Fathers of the American Republic, whereby the authority of government depends on observing limitations on its just powers.[28] What began as a social movement in the 1890s grew into a popular political movement referred to as the Progressive Era; in the 1912 United States presidential election, all three U.S. presidential candidates claimed to be progressives. While the term progressivism represents a range of diverse political pressure groups, not always united, progressives rejected social Darwinism, believing that the problems society faced, such as class warfare, greed, poverty, racism and violence, could best be addressed by providing good education, a safe environment, and an efficient workplace. Progressives lived mainly in the cities, were college educated, and believed in a strong central government.[29] President Theodore Roosevelt of the Republican Party and later the Progressive Party declared that he "always believed that wise progressivism and wise conservatism go hand in hand."[30]

President Woodrow Wilson was also a member of the American progressive movement within the Democratic Party. Progressive stances have evolved. Imperialism was a controversial issue within progressivism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, particularly in the United States, where some progressives supported American imperialism while others opposed it.[31] In response to World War I, President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points established the concept of national self-determination and criticised imperialist competition and colonial injustices. Anti-imperialists supported these views in areas resisting imperial rule.[32]

During the period of acceptance of economic Keynesianism (the 1930s–1970s), there was widespread acceptance in many nations of a large role for state intervention in the economy. With the rise of neoliberalism and challenges to state interventionist policies in the 1970s and 1980s, centre-left progressive movements responded by adopting the Third Way, which emphasised a major role for the market economy.[33]

Part of a series on
Social democracy
History
Concepts
Ideologies
People
Parties
Organizations
Related

There have been social democrats who have called for the social-democratic movement to move past Third Way.[34] Prominent progressive conservative elements in the British Conservative Party have criticised neoliberalism.[35]

In the 21st century, progressives continue to favour public policy that they theorise will reduce or lessen the harmful effects of economic inequality as well as systemic discrimination such as institutional racism; to advocate for social safety nets and workers' rights; and to oppose corporate influence on the democratic process. The unifying theme is to call attention to the negative impacts of current institutions or ways of doing things and to advocate for social progress, i.e., for positive change as defined by any of several standards such as the expansion of democracy, increased egalitarianism in the form of economic and social equality as well as improved well-being of a population. Proponents of social democracy have identified themselves as promoting the progressive cause.[36]

Types

[edit]

Cultural progressivism

[edit]

Progressivism, in the general sense, mainly means social and cultural progressivism. The term cultural liberalism is used in a substantially similar context and can be said to be a synonym for cultural progressivism.[37] Unlike progressives in a broader sense, some cultural progressives may be economically centrist, conservative, or politically libertarian. The Czech Pirate Party is classified as a (cultural or social) progressive party,[38] and it calls itself "economically centrist and socially liberal".[39]

Economic progressivism

[edit]
Main article: Economic progressivism

Economic progressivism—also New Progressive Economics[40]—is a term used to distinguish it from progressivism in cultural fields. Economic progressives may draw from a variety of economic traditions, including democratic capitalism, democratic socialism, social democracy, and social liberalism. Overall, economic progressives' views are rooted in the concept of social justice and the common good, and aim to improve the human condition through government regulation, social protections and the maintenance of public goods.[41] Some economic progressives may show centre-right views on cultural issues. These movements are related to communitarian conservative movements such as Christian democracy and one-nation conservatism.[8][9]

Techno progressivism

[edit]
Main article: Techno-progressivism

An early mention of techno-progressivism appeared in 1999 as the removal of "all political, cultural, biological, and psychological limits to self-actualization and self-realization".[42] According to techno-progressivism, scientific and technical aspects of progress are linked to ethical and social developments in society. Therefore, according to the majority of techno-progressive viewpoints, advancements in science and technology will not be considered proper progress until and unless they are accompanied by a fair distribution of the costs, risks, and rewards of these new capabilities. Many techno-progressive critics and supporters believe that while improved democracy, increased justice, decreased violence, and a broader culture of rights are all desirable, they are insufficient on their own to address the problems of modern technological societies unless and until they are accompanied by scientific and technological advancements that uphold and apply these ideals.[43][44][self-published source?]

Progressive parties or parties with progressive factions

[edit]
Part of the Politics Series
Party politics
Political spectrum
Left-wing
Centre
Right-wing
Syncretic
Major ideologies
Types
Leaders and organization
Internal elections
Party discipline
Party systems
Coalitions between parties
Lists of political parties
icon Politics portal

Current parties

[edit]

Former parties

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Progressivism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Progressivism is and reform movement originating in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that advocates for active government intervention to address social, economic, and political problems arising from rapid industrialization, , and , with the aim of fostering societal improvement through expert administration, regulatory measures, and expanded democratic mechanisms. The movement, often associated with the Progressive Era from the to the 1920s, sought to combat corruption, monopolies, and social ills like child labor and unsafe working conditions through legislative reforms including antitrust laws, labor protections, and the of senators via the 17th . Key figures such as President championed "trust-busting" against corporate excesses and conservation efforts, while advanced federal regulatory agencies and wartime mobilization, though these expansions often centralized power in the executive branch at the expense of constitutional checks. Significant achievements included via the 19th Amendment and the establishment of institutions like the to protect , yet the era also featured controversies such as widespread support among progressives for policies, under the 18th Amendment which fueled , and policies under Wilson, highlighting tensions between reformist ideals and coercive outcomes. In the modern context, progressivism has evolved to emphasize identity-based equity, expansive welfare programs, and cultural transformations, diverging from classical focuses on and expertise by prioritizing redistribution and social , often critiqued for undermining individual liberties and of policy efficacy.

Definition and Core Principles

Philosophical Foundations

Progressivism's philosophical core assumes a directional trajectory of human advancement, wherein societal conditions improve cumulatively through the methodical application of rational inquiry, empirical science, and targeted reforms, rejecting cyclical or static views of . This optimism originates in Enlightenment conceptions of progress, exemplified by Antoine-Nicolas de Condorcet's 1795 Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progrès de l'esprit humain, which delineates ten epochs of intellectual evolution leading to perpetual refinement via scientific methods and education, positing that obstacles to progress, such as and inequality, yield to reason's inexorable advance. Similarly, Auguste Comte's positivism, articulated in his 1830–1842 Cours de philosophie positive, frames societal development through three stages—the theological (explanatory via supernatural causes), metaphysical (abstract forces), and positive (scientific laws)—culminating in a era where verifiable knowledge supplants speculation, enabling systematic social reorganization. In contrast to conservatism's epistemological toward untested innovations—prioritizing inherited s as evolved safeguards against human fallibility and emphasizing organic, incremental —progressivism invests confidence in human agency to override historical contingencies through expert analysis and intervention, viewing not as presumptively authoritative but as a provisional artifact amenable to rational overhaul when deemed obstructive. This faith manifests in a for centralized, knowledge-based direction over decentralized trial-and-error, predicated on the causal of applied expertise in mitigating inefficiencies inherent in pre-scientific orders. Philosophically, progressivism diverges from classical liberalism's foundational stress on inviolable individual rights and emerging from voluntary exchanges, which constrain state power to negative liberties (freedoms from interference). Instead, it reconceives as a entity engineerable for aggregate , subordinating isolated prerogatives to holistic redesigns that harness institutional mechanisms for egalitarian ends, thereby inverting liberalism's presumption against proactive in favor of instrumental collectivism. This transition reflects a deeper ontological shift: from viewing as fixed and self-regulating to perceiving it as plastic, responsive to environmental and structural manipulations guided by progressive .

Key Tenets and Assumptions

Progressivism posits that is malleable, subject to significant improvement through deliberate social, educational, and institutional reforms rather than constrained by inherent fixed traits. This assumption underpins the belief that environmental factors and policy interventions can reshape behaviors and societal outcomes, enabling ongoing advancement beyond traditional limits. Central tenets include expanding the government's role to address inequalities via mechanisms such as initiatives, , and redistributive policies aimed at egalitarian outcomes. Adherents assume that prioritizing equity—equalized results—over equality of opportunity is essential, viewing systemic structures as perpetuating disparities that require proactive state correction rather than reliance on individual merit alone. Progressives hold that material and technological advancements facilitate parallel moral progress, expanding ethical considerations such as broader circles of concern for marginalized groups or the environment. This optimistic linkage presumes a directional trajectory where inherently elevates ethical standards, though reveals inconsistencies, including moral declines amid prosperity in various historical contexts. The ideology critiques existing institutions and traditions as inherently oppressive, fueling demands for continuous, iterative reforms without ultimate endpoints or fixed ideals of . This perpetual orientation assumes the status quo embeds outdated power imbalances, necessitating unending adaptation to achieve evolving notions of fairness.

Historical Development

Enlightenment and Pre-20th Century Roots

The Enlightenment of the laid foundational intellectual groundwork for later progressive thought through its emphasis on human reason as a tool for societal improvement and rejection of rooted in or divine right. Thinkers posited that rational inquiry, scientific advancement, and institutional reform could drive continuous toward greater , viewing as a trajectory amenable to human direction rather than fixed by providence or fate. This optimism contrasted with prior cyclical or degenerative views of , asserting instead an indefinite perfectibility of the human condition via education, liberty, and empirical knowledge. A pivotal articulation came from the Marquis de Condorcet in his 1795 Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind, written amid the French Revolution, which outlined ten epochs of human advancement culminating in future eras of universal equality, abolition of inequality between nations and sexes, and eradication of prejudices through scientific and moral progress. Condorcet argued that political and economic liberty would enable the human race to overcome ignorance and vice, fostering perpetual improvement without predetermined limits, an idea that influenced subsequent reformist optimism by framing societal ills as solvable through rational intervention. While Condorcet's work reflected Enlightenment faith in progress, it also assumed empirical laws of social development akin to natural sciences, prioritizing causal mechanisms like education over metaphysical constraints. In the , these notions evolved amid industrialization's social upheavals, with providing a systematic ethic for reform by measuring policies against their capacity to maximize aggregate happiness. (1748–1832), in works like An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789), proposed the "greatest happiness principle" as the criterion for legislation and morals, advocating reforms in prisons, poor laws, and education to quantify and enhance utility through rational calculation, thereby challenging inherited institutions on evidence-based grounds. influence extended to critiques of and calls for codification, emphasizing that laws should derive from observable consequences rather than , laying a consequentialist basis for progressive interventions. John Stuart Mill (1806–1873) refined in Utilitarianism (1861) and (1859), integrating qualitative distinctions in pleasures and defending as instrumental to societal , while supporting state roles in and welfare to cultivate higher faculties amid industrial disruptions. Mill viewed as inherently progressive, arguing it justified reforms like expanded and labor protections by aligning incentives with long-term human development, though he cautioned against majority tyranny, grounding reforms in empirical utility rather than abstract equality. Early socialist thinkers like Claude Henri de Saint-Simon (1760–1825) further prefigured progressive organizational ideals by envisioning a meritocratic society directed by scientists and industrialists to harness production for collective welfare, responding to post-Revolutionary inequalities with proposals for planned resource allocation over competitive markets. Saint-Simon's L'Industrie (1817) and later works critiqued feudal remnants in favor of a "positive" science of society, where experts would replace parasitic classes with productive ones, influencing reformist zeal for technocratic management of industrial society's emergent challenges like urban poverty and . These pre-20th-century ideas collectively emphasized causal reform through reason and evidence, setting the stage for organized movements without yet coalescing into distinct political programs.

Progressive Era in the United States

The Progressive Era in the United States, approximately 1890 to 1920, represented a concerted effort to mitigate the socioeconomic disruptions of rapid industrialization and urbanization during the Gilded Age, including monopolistic trusts, labor exploitation, and political corruption. Reformers advocated for expanded government authority to regulate business, improve public health, and enforce moral standards, often drawing on empirical observations of urban squalor and inefficiency. This period crystallized progressivism through legislative achievements that aimed to curb corporate power and promote social welfare, though implementations varied in efficacy and sometimes incorporated pseudoscientific rationales. Pivotal reforms targeted economic concentration, exemplified by the , which prohibited contracts or combinations in and attempts. Enforcement intensified under President (1901–1909), who pursued "trust-busting" by initiating over 40 antitrust lawsuits against major corporations, including the dissolution of in 1904. President (1913–1921) continued this trajectory with the of 1913, establishing a central banking system to stabilize currency and credit amid financial panics. Additional measures included the and Meat Inspection Act of 1906, spurred by Upton Sinclair's 1906 novel , which documented unsanitary conditions in Chicago's through investigative reporting. Social reforms emphasized efficiency and moral regulation, with Frederick Winslow Taylor's principles of —detailed in his 1911 work —promoting time-motion studies to optimize industrial productivity and reduce waste. culminated in the 19th Amendment, ratified August 18, 1920, prohibiting denial of voting rights on account of sex after decades of activism. Conversely, the 18th Amendment, ratified January 16, 1919, banned the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors, reflecting temperance advocates' view of alcohol as a causal factor in and , though it later proved unenforceable and economically disruptive. A notable aspect of progressive thought involved support for to engineer societal improvement, with figures like Roosevelt endorsing to enhance national vitality. This culminated in the 1927 Supreme Court decision , upholding Virginia's law for the "," authorizing procedures on over 60,000 individuals nationwide by mid-century under similar statutes. Such policies, grounded in then-prevalent but empirically flawed genetic , highlighted progressives' faith in expert-led interventions, later critiqued for ethical overreach absent rigorous causal validation.

20th Century Expansions and Variants

In the 1930s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt's programs marked a substantial expansion of progressive economic interventionism amid the , institutionalizing federal responsibilities for social welfare and labor protections. The , enacted on August 14, 1935, established a national framework for old-age pensions, unemployment insurance, aid to dependent children, and assistance for the disabled, funded through payroll taxes on employers and employees. Complementing this, the National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act) of July 5, 1935, affirmed workers' rights to form unions and bargain collectively, creating the independent to adjudicate labor disputes and prevent employer interference. These measures shifted progressive priorities toward a managed economy, prioritizing stability over principles, though they faced constitutional challenges resolved by the in 1937. The 1960s Great Society initiatives under President built upon precedents, intensifying federal anti-poverty efforts through expansive social legislation. In his January 8, 1964, address, Johnson declared an "unconditional ," leading to the Economic Opportunity Act of August 1964, which allocated $947.5 million for programs including Head Start preschool education, vocational training, and community action agencies aimed at empowering the poor. The Social Security Amendments of July 30, 1965, introduced Medicare—a program for those 65 and older—and for low-income individuals and families, dramatically expanding access to medical care with initial enrollment exceeding 19 million by 1966. Assessments of these programs reveal mixed empirical outcomes, with notable successes in reducing elderly —dropping from 35% in 1959 to 10% by 1974—contrasted by persistent overall rates that fell from 19% in 1964 to 12.1% in 1969 before plateauing around 11-13% through the 1970s despite spending escalation from $45 billion in 1965 to $140 billion by 1972 (in 2014 dollars). Analyses indicate work disincentives and dependency effects, as welfare expansions correlated with labor force participation declines among single mothers and family structure erosion, with net impacts varying and diminishing post-1970s due to behavioral responses outweighing income transfers in some cohorts. Parallel to these policy developments, the of the and redirected progressive activism toward cultural critique and social upheaval, diverging from earlier economic focus by emphasizing identity, anti-authoritarianism, and lifestyle reform. Emerging from student-led groups like , which issued the 1962 calling for , the movement fused civil rights advocacy—supporting the 1964 and 1965 Voting Rights Act—with opposition to the and challenges to hierarchical institutions. This evolution incorporated countercultural elements, such as communal living experiments and rejection of traditional sexual mores, influencing broader progressive shifts but also fostering factionalism and tactics like campus occupations that alienated mainstream support by the decade's end.

Ideological Variants

Social and Cultural Progressivism

Social and cultural progressivism emphasizes the reform of societal norms, structures, and personal identities to promote individual and equality, often challenging traditional religious and frameworks. This variant seeks to erode rigid roles, expand for sexual minorities, and advance secular , viewing such changes as essential for human flourishing. Proponents argue that historical customs, including patriarchal models and religious dominance, stifle personal freedom and perpetuate inequality. Key historical achievements include the dismantling of Jim Crow segregation laws through the and the , which prohibited in public accommodations and voting, respectively, marking a decisive end to legalized apartheid in the United States. These reforms, driven by activists aligned with progressive ideals of equality, eliminated de segregation enforced since the late . The sexual revolution of the 1960s further exemplified cultural shifts, with the introduction of the contraceptive pill in 1960 enabling separation of sex from reproduction and contributing to widespread acceptance of and alternative lifestyles. Advocacy for fluidity emerged prominently in the late , building on earlier progressive efforts like and labor reforms, by promoting flexible expressions of identity beyond binary norms. efforts paralleled these changes, correlating with declining religious adherence in Western societies, as modernization reduced reliance on faith for social order. laws, first enacted in in 1969 and adopted nationwide by the mid-1970s, facilitated easier marital dissolution without proving wrongdoing, reflecting progressive commitments to individual agency over institutional stability. Empirical data reveal mixed outcomes, with no-fault reforms linked to a 10% short-term spike in rates persisting for about a decade in adopting states. Post-1970s surges correlated with rising single-parent households, which studies associate with higher and behavioral issues compared to intact . Critics contend that cultural progressivism's embrace of —evident in tolerance for divergent ethical standards across groups—undermines shared societal values, potentially fostering instability by prioritizing subjective fulfillment over objective norms. While achievements in advanced formal equality, overreach into has drawn scrutiny for eroding family cohesion, as evidenced by sustained elevations and secular trends coinciding with weakened ties.

Economic Progressivism

emphasizes government intervention in markets to achieve greater income equality through mechanisms such as progressive taxation, laws, and strengthened labor unions. Proponents argue these policies counteract market failures that concentrate among capital owners and high earners, drawing from observations of rising inequality in laissez-faire systems. For instance, in the United States, top marginal rates exceeded 90% from 1944 to 1963, intended to fund social programs while curbing excessive accumulation. s establish a floor on labor compensation to prevent exploitation, while union empowerment enables for higher wages and benefits, posited to boost worker via better morale and reduced turnover. Post-World War II implementations of these tenets in welfare states correlated with reduced income inequality, as measured by lower Gini coefficients in and the during the 1950s-1970s, partly attributable to redistributive transfers that halved disparities from pre-tax incomes in Britain by 1948. However, wartime destruction and compressed structures also contributed significantly to equalization, independent of . Empirical analyses indicate progressive taxation often exerts a negative effect on GDP growth, with studies of countries showing progressivity hindering expansion through reduced incentives for investment and labor supply. Critics highlight incentive distortions, as evidenced by the , where US tax cuts in 1964 (from 91% to 70%) and 1981 (to 28%) expanded revenues by stimulating economic activity and . hikes show modest negative effects in peer-reviewed meta-analyses, particularly among low-skilled teens, with 19 studies documenting job losses versus 8 finding gains. Union density correlates with higher firm productivity in some cases but fails to offset elevated costs, yielding 10-20% profit reductions and slower adjustments in competitive sectors. These interventions, while mitigating short-term inequality, have been linked to Europe's comparatively stagnant growth relative to the US since the , underscoring trade-offs in long-term dynamism.

Techno-Progressivism and Futurism

represents a variant of progressivism that champions the integration of rapid with social reform to achieve human advancement and mitigate systemic inequities. Proponents argue that technologies such as , , and can democratize access to resources, enhance individual capabilities, and resolve longstanding scarcities in energy, food, and healthcare. This stance draws from Enlightenment-era optimism about reason and , positing that ethical oversight of with policy can foster equitable outcomes without relying solely on traditional redistributive measures. In its historical manifestation, techno-progressivism echoes the Progressive Era's , which from approximately 1890 to 1932 applied principles—pioneered by figures like Frederick Taylor—to streamline industrial production, , and governmental operations. Adherents sought to impose rational, data-driven methods on chaotic systems, such as time-motion studies in factories that increased output by up to 200% in some cases while aiming to reduce waste and worker exploitation. This approach viewed technology not as an end but as a tool for societal rationalization, influencing policies like urban electrification and standardized that boosted U.S. GDP growth from 4% annually in the early 1900s. Contemporary techno-progressivism intersects with through ideologies like , which advocates using , neural interfaces, and cybernetic enhancements to overcome biological limitations, potentially eradicating aging and disease by mid-century according to some projections. complements this by directing resources toward high-leverage technological interventions, such as AI-driven , with organizations like the Open Philanthropy Project committing over $1 billion since 2017 to such causes under the rationale of maximizing . Advocates, including effective altruists, contend that exponential tech progress could generate economies, where abundance in computational power and obviates traditional conflicts over resources. However, techno-progressive optimism faces scrutiny for presuming technological neutrality, as algorithms in platforms like and have empirically amplified echo chambers, with studies showing a 20-30% increase in polarized content exposure among users from 2016-2020 due to recommendation systems prioritizing engagement over balance. Critics highlight hubris in over-relying on tech solutions, noting instances where AI deployments, such as tools, perpetuated biases from training data, leading to 10-20% higher error rates for minority groups in U.S. cities like from 2010-2020. In response, progressive-oriented AI ethics frameworks push for regulatory measures, including the EU's AI Act of 2024, which classifies high-risk systems and mandates transparency to align with welfare. Such efforts underscore tensions between unfettered and demands for accountable , where unchecked optimism risks exacerbating inequalities rather than resolving them.

Political Implementation and Movements

Progressive Parties and Factions

In the United States, historical manifestations of progressivism include the National Progressive Party, formed in 1912 under Theodore Roosevelt after his split from the Republican Party, earning the nickname Bull Moose Party from Roosevelt's declaration of feeling "fit as a bull moose." The party nominated Roosevelt for president that year, drawing from reform-minded Republicans dissatisfied with the status quo. Contemporary progressive factions operate primarily within the Democratic Party, exemplified by the , which comprises nearly 100 members from the House and Senate pushing for left-leaning changes. Independent senator has been a key figurehead for this wing since his 2016 and 2020 presidential campaigns, influencing party platforms through grassroots mobilization. In , progressivism aligns closely with social democratic traditions, as seen in Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD), founded in 1863 and evolving into a major force advocating workers' representation before . The SPD's pre-war emphasis on positioned it as a progressive counterweight to conservative monarchism. The United Kingdom's Labour Party, established in 1900 by trade unions and socialist societies, similarly embodies progressive elements through its focus on labor interests. Globally, Latin America's from the early 2000s featured progressive parties gaining power, such as Venezuela's led by , which transitioned into the . However, demonstrated authoritarian drifts post-1998, shifting toward electoral authoritarianism by consolidating power through institutional changes. This wave included other left-leaning groups in countries like and , marking a regional turn toward progressive .

Major Policy Reforms and Achievements

Progressive reforms in during the early yielded measurable reductions in infectious disease mortality through and initiatives. Municipal adoption of , championed by progressive advocates, resulted in an average 46% decline in deaths across U.S. cities, contributing to the disease's near-eradication by 1936. Typhoid incidence dropped from about 100 cases per 100,000 population in 1900 to 33.8 per 100,000 by 1920, a causal outcome linked directly to and chlorination technologies implemented in response to urban health crises. The of June 30, 1906, prohibited interstate commerce in adulterated or misbranded foods and drugs, establishing federal oversight that curtailed widespread contamination and deception in consumer products. This legislation fostered safer food supplies, reducing incidences of foodborne illnesses and building the regulatory framework later expanded by the FDA, with gains evident in declining mortality from adulterated goods. labor restrictions, advanced through progressive state laws and federalized in the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, limited employment for minors under 16 during school hours, correlating with elevated school enrollment; jurisdictions enforcing minimum employment ages of 15 or higher observed significant increases in participation, freeing children for formal schooling over factory work. These and labor measures underpinned broader gains in longevity, as U.S. rose from 47.3 years in 1900 to 68.2 years by 1950, with sanitation reforms and hygiene improvements accounting for approximately 25 of the 30+ years of added lifespan through lowered infectious rates. The of August 15, 1935, introduced contributory old-age insurance, yielding a causal reduction in elderly ; econometric analysis shows that a $1,000 benefit increase correlates with a 2-3 drop in senior rates, stabilizing income for millions post-retirement. In civil rights, the Voting Rights Act of August 6, 1965, enforced federal oversight in discriminatory jurisdictions, precipitating sharp rises in Black voter registration—from 6.7% to 59.8% in alone between 1964 and 1967—and sustained higher turnout, empowering minority without prior legal barriers.

Global Manifestations

In , progressivism adapted into social democratic models emphasizing comprehensive welfare states alongside economies, particularly in like and . These systems feature high progressive taxation to fund universal , with 's top marginal rate at 57.3% as of 2023, enabling extensive public spending on healthcare, , and pensions that constitutes over 50% of GDP. However, this fiscal structure has correlated with emigration of high-skilled workers and entrepreneurs; for instance, a Fed analysis found that historical brain drain in reduced physician density by up to 10%, contributing to elevated mortality rates and increased hospitalizations between 1960 and 2000. Empirical studies on wealth taxes in indicate modest but detectable migration responses among the affluent, with elasticities suggesting policy-induced outflows that marginally erode the tax base without collapsing it. In post-colonial , progressive ideologies often manifested through state-led and import-substitution industrialization, diverging from U.S. regulatory progressivism by prioritizing and central planning. India's Nehruvian model from to exemplified this, with policies like the establishing public-sector dominance and licensing requirements that stifled private enterprise, yielding an average GDP growth of 3.5% annually—the so-called ""—amid persistent poverty affecting over 50% of the population. A foreign exchange crisis in , triggered by fiscal deficits exceeding 8% of GDP and reserves covering only two weeks of imports, compelled liberalization under Finance Minister , dismantling much of the License Raj and spurring average growth above 6% for decades thereafter. In Africa, post-independence progressive experiments frequently adopted statist socialism inspired by anti-colonial ideals, entailing land reforms, collectivization, and heavy state intervention that amplified corruption risks due to weak institutions and centralized power. Tanzania's Ujamaa villages policy, implemented from 1967 under , sought self-reliant communal production but led to agricultural output declines of up to 20% in affected areas by the , exacerbating food shortages and economic contraction averaging -1% GDP growth in the late . Such approaches in statist developing economies often fostered networks, with post-colonial African states scoring below global averages on indices; for example, centralized correlated with failures that perpetuated low wages and , undermining developmental goals. Compared to U.S. progressivism's focus on antitrust and labor reforms within , global variants in the developing world emphasized etatist control, heightening vulnerabilities to and inefficiency where rule-of-law foundations were nascent.

Criticisms and Theoretical Challenges

Conservative and Libertarian Critiques

Conservatives argue that progressivism disrupts the organic social bonds and inherited traditions that have historically sustained communities and moral order. By prioritizing rationalist reform over time-tested customs, progressive policies erode the "little platoons" of family, church, and locality that described as essential to societal stability, leading to social atomization and cultural decay. This critique posits that progressivism's faith in expert-driven change ignores the wisdom embedded in traditions, fostering instead a rootless vulnerable to state overreach. Libertarians contend that progressivism's advocacy for extensive state intervention violates the spontaneous order of markets and civil society, where individual actions coordinate through voluntary exchange rather than top-down directives. Ludwig von Mises highlighted the economic calculation problem in socialism, arguing that without private property and market prices, central planners lack the information to rationally allocate resources, inevitably resulting in inefficiency and waste. Friedrich Hayek extended this by warning in The Road to Serfdom (1944) that even well-intentioned planning requires coercive enforcement to suppress dissent and adapt to unforeseen complexities, paving the way to totalitarianism as freedoms are subordinated to the plan. Empirical illustrations of these critiques include the 1965 Moynihan Report, which documented the disintegration of the Black family structure— with nearly one-fourth of Black families headed by females and rising —attributing it partly to policies that disincentivized stable two-parent households, a pattern conservatives link to broader progressive welfare expansions that undermine personal responsibility and traditional roles. Libertarians further point to such interventions as distortions of market signals, prolonging dependency and stifling entrepreneurial responses to social needs.

Internal Progressive Debates

Within progressivism, longstanding tensions exist between reformist strains emphasizing gradual, democratic adjustments within existing institutions and radical strains advocating systemic overthrow or intolerance toward opposing views. Reformists, such as philosopher , promoted pragmatic experimentation through education and policy iteration to foster social intelligence and incremental progress, as outlined in his 1916 work , where he argued schools should cultivate adaptive citizens capable of solving societal problems without revolutionary disruption. In contrast, radicals like , a key thinker, critiqued liberal frameworks as perpetuating , contending in his 1965 essay "Repressive Tolerance" that genuine emancipation demands withdrawing tolerance from regressive ideologies to enable liberating ones, thereby prioritizing ends over procedural norms. This divide manifested in the early 20th-century , where reformers pursued antitrust laws and labor protections via legislation, while radicals dismissed such measures as insufficient, insisting on abolishing entirely to avert co-optation by elites. Debates over speech regulation further underscore internal fractures, particularly regarding the trade-offs between unrestricted expression and curbing harms like . Progressive advocates of regulation, drawing on evolving interpretations of harm principles, have supported campus speech codes since the 1980s to shield vulnerable groups from psychological injury, viewing such limits as essential for equitable discourse. Opponents within the movement, however, invoke classical liberal safeguards—echoing John Stuart Mill's 1859 emphasis on truth emerging from open clash of ideas—warning that selective risks entrenching power imbalances and stifling dissent, as evidenced by intra-left critiques of 2010s-2020s efforts that alienated moderate allies. These rifts intensified in academic settings, where empirical studies from 2018 onward documented progressive faculty majorities favoring restrictions, yet surveys revealed subgroup divisions, with 20-30% of self-identified liberals opposing broad curbs to preserve intellectual pluralism. Historically, exposed schisms on foreign policy, pitting interventionists against isolationists within progressive ranks. While figures like President integrated progressive domestic reforms with anti-fascist mobilization—evident in his 1937 advocating —pockets of the left, including pacifist socialists and some union leaders, resisted entry into the conflict until in , fearing it would derail class struggle at home and perpetuate . This isolationist faction, comprising groups like the Keep America Out of War Committee formed in 1940, argued moral consistency demanded opposing all wars, creating rifts that fractured alliances and delayed unified support for Allied efforts despite shared anti-authoritarian ideals. Such debates highlighted causal disconnects: reformists saw pragmatic engagement as advancing global equity, while radicals prioritized anti-militarist purity, influencing post-war realignments toward .

Empirical Outcomes and Unintended Consequences

Positive Impacts and Verifiable Successes

The implementation of Social Security under the in 1935 substantially lowered elderly rates , with rates dropping from approximately 50% to 9.4% by 2006, a decline attributed in large part to benefit expansions and coverage growth. Social Security currently lifts 16.3 million older adults above the line annually, representing a direct causal link between the program and reduced destitution among retirees through guaranteed income streams. Expansions via the programs, including Medicare and enacted in 1965, further halved overall elderly from 28.5% in 1966 to around 10% by the early , enabling access to healthcare that prevented financial ruin from medical costs. The initiatives under President from 1964 onward correlated with a 42% national rate decline by 1973, falling from 19% to 11.1%, driven by targeted transfers and job that lifted millions, including families, out of subsistence living. These outcomes reflect verifiable transfers of resources to low-income groups, with econometric analyses estimating that a $1,000 increase in benefits reduces elderly by 2-3 percentage points through direct income supplementation. The Clean Air Act of 1970 established federal standards for pollutants, resulting in a 68% aggregate reduction in emissions of criteria pollutants like , nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter by 2020, while U.S. GDP expanded over fivefold in real terms during the same period. This regulatory framework averted an estimated 230,000 premature deaths and 24 million lost workdays annually by the 1990s, with cost-benefit ratios exceeding 30:1 according to Environmental Protection Agency assessments, demonstrating effective pollution control without impeding . Ambient concentrations of key pollutants, such as lead, fell by over 90% post-enactment, correlating with gains including reduced respiratory illnesses.

Negative Consequences and Failures

Progressive welfare policies implemented in the United States during the 1960s, such as expansions under the programs, have been linked to the creation of welfare traps that disincentivized and work, contributing to a sharp rise in single-parent households. In black communities, the proportion of children living in single-parent homes increased from about 22% in 1960 to over 50% by 2020, with nonmarital birth rates rising from roughly 25% in 1965 to 72% by 2019, as documented by Charles Murray in Losing Ground, who attributed this trend to benefits structured in ways that rewarded family separation over intact households. This family structure shift correlated with persistent cycles, as single-mother families headed by black women exhibited poverty rates exceeding 40% in recent data, exacerbating intergenerational dependency rather than fostering self-sufficiency. The "defund the police" movement, a progressive push following the 2020 George Floyd incident, led to budget cuts and staffing reductions in major U.S. cities, coinciding with a nationwide homicide surge. FBI data recorded a 30% increase in murders in 2020 compared to 2019, with spikes in cities like Minneapolis (up 83% after a $15 million cut and disbanding of gun violence units), Chicago, and New York, where reduced proactive policing allowed crime to escalate before partial reversals in funding. Empirical analyses indicate that lower arrest rates and police presence directly contributed to these rises, as cities reinstating stops and arrests saw homicides decline rapidly by 2023-2024, underscoring the policy's failure to reduce violence through reallocation to social services alone. U.S. public education spending, often aligned with progressive priorities like expanded administration and equity programs, has risen dramatically without corresponding gains in student outcomes. Real per-pupil expenditures increased by over 245% since the 1970s (adjusted for inflation), yet (NAEP) long-term trend scores for 9-year-olds in reading rose only about 7 points from 1971 to 2022, with mathematics showing minimal net gains amid recent declines, indicating stagnation despite the influx of funds. This disconnect persisted as spending prioritized non-instructional areas, failing to address core instructional deficiencies and resulting in proficiency rates hovering below 40% in key subjects by the 2020s.

Causal Analyses of Policy Effects

Progressive policies frequently aim to mitigate market inequalities through direct interventions such as or mandates, yet these measures often generate by disrupting underlying structures and signals that coordinate economic activity. From a causal perspective, such interventions treat symptoms rather than root causes, artificially elevating costs or capping returns, which predictably reduces supply in affected sectors as agents respond rationally to diminished profitability. Empirical analyses reveal that these distortions manifest in reduced , shortages, and inefficient , outcomes attributable to the law of rather than implementation flaws. A prominent example involves minimum wage increases, which seek to boost worker incomes but elevate labor costs above market-clearing levels, prompting employers—particularly in low-margin sectors—to curtail hiring or hours, especially for inexperienced youth workers whose marginal aligns with lower wages. In , the phased implementation of a $15 hourly reached $13 in 2017, after which a study documented a 9% decline in low-wage among affected workers, equivalent to a loss of approximately 5,000 jobs citywide, as firms automated tasks, reduced staffing, or relocated operations. This effect stemmed from heightened operational costs squeezing profit margins, leading to substitution away from low-skill labor; subsequent revisions to the study confirmed persistent hours averaging 9% per worker, underscoring how wage floors disrupt labor market matching without addressing gaps or barriers. Rent control policies, intended to enhance affordability, similarly cap rental yields below market rates, deterring investment in maintenance and new construction while incentivizing landlords to convert units to higher-value uses like condominiums or non-residential purposes. In , the 1994 expansion of rent control to smaller multifamily buildings under Proposition M resulted in a 15% reduction in the rental supply from treated properties, as owners responded by exiting the rental market, contributing to a 5.1% citywide rent increase due to diminished availability. Causal mechanisms here involve altered property rights signals: with returns constrained, capital flows toward unregulated alternatives, exacerbating shortages in high-demand areas and trapping tenants in suboptimal units while inflating prices for uncontrolled segments. In contrast, conservative-oriented deregulatory approaches in the under President Reagan reversed such distortions by removing barriers to entry and competition, fostering supply expansions that lowered costs and spurred growth through restored market incentives. of industries like trucking, airlines, and —building on late-1970s reforms—enabled new entrants, reducing freight rates by up to 30% and airfares by 40% in real terms, as firms innovated and scaled without artificial constraints, yielding an average annual GDP growth of 3.5% from 1983 to 1989 following the early- . This causal chain highlights how alleviating regulatory burdens aligns private incentives with , generating verifiable expansions in output and consumer welfare absent in intervention-heavy frameworks.

Contemporary Forms

Shift to Identity Politics and Wokeism

In the late , progressive ideology increasingly shifted from class-based economic analyses toward frameworks centered on group identities and intersecting oppressions, a development crystallized by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw's 1989 paper "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex," which argued that failed to address the compounded disadvantages faced by at the nexus of race and . This concept of extended to broader identity categories including sexuality, , and , framing social as requiring recognition of hierarchical victimhood among marginalized groups rather than universal class . Proponents viewed this evolution as addressing overlooked systemic biases, but critics contend it fragmented progressive coalitions by subordinating economic redistribution to grievance-based competitions within identity hierarchies. The term "," originating in as early as to denote alertness to racial injustice—such as in protests against the trial—gained traction in progressive activism during the 2010s, particularly through the movement, evolving into a shorthand for heightened sensitivity to perceived microaggressions and institutional across society. By the , "wokeism" encapsulated a cultural ethos demanding proactive measures against "systemic" inequities, often manifesting in corporate and institutional mandates for (DEI) programs that prioritize representational outcomes over color-blind . This marked a departure from classical progressive , which emphasized through individual achievement, toward equity-focused interventions that adjust standards to achieve proportional group representation, such as hiring quotas or adjusted performance metrics. Empirical assessments of DEI-driven equity policies reveal mixed but often adverse effects on organizational performance, with a 2023 Stanford study finding that firms embroiled in DEI-related controversies experienced immediate stock price declines of approximately 0.72% and sustained annual underperformance of 3.5% relative to industry peers for up to four years, attributing this to eroded investor confidence in merit-based . Analyses of prior research claiming diversity boosts firm value, such as those from McKinsey, have been critiqued for methodological flaws including and failure to control for factors like firm size, leading to overstated causal links between demographic quotas and profitability. In sectors like and , implementation of equity-preferring DEI has correlated with talent flight and stagnation, as high-skill individuals prioritize environments rewarding competence over identity balancing, underscoring a causal tension between group-equity mandates and efficiency-driven outcomes.

2020s Developments and Backlash

In the early 2020s, progressive activism peaked following the death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, which sparked nationwide Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests demanding police reform and racial justice, with public support for the BLM movement reaching 67% of U.S. adults in June 2020. Support for associated policies like reducing police budgets to fund social programs also surged, with 47% of Americans favoring such reallocations in July 2020. However, by 2023, BLM support had fallen to 51%, and further declined to around 45-52% by 2024-2025, reflecting voter disillusionment amid rising crime rates in major cities and perceptions of policy failures. Similarly, backing for "defund the police" dropped to 18% by May 2025, while public confidence in police rebounded from 48% in 2020 to 51% in 2024. The 2024 U.S. presidential election marked a significant electoral rejection of progressive dominance, with securing victories in key battleground states like , , and , leading to Kamala Harris's defeat and signaling widespread fatigue with identity-focused overreach and "soft ." Progressive congressional challengers, who proliferated in 2020 primaries, largely vanished by 2024, underscoring a strategic retreat from bold identity-driven platforms amid losses among working-class voters. In , the June 2024 European Parliament elections delivered gains for right-leaning parties emphasizing controls, with far-right groups securing increased seats and influencing policy debates on migration, as seen in strong performances by 's (31% vote share) and shifts in national polls across , , and . These results prompted incumbents to adopt harder lines on borders, reversing prior open policies amid public concerns over integration failures and security. Pro-Palestinian campus protests from late 2023 to mid-2024, erupting after the , 2023, attacks on , further fueled backlash by revealing illiberal tendencies within progressive circles, including disruptions, antisemitic incidents (over 2,000 documented on U.S. campuses from June 2023 to May 2024), and demands for ideological conformity that clashed with free speech norms. While 45% of U.S. college students supported the protests by May 2024, they prompted congressional scrutiny, administrative crackdowns, and donor withdrawals at institutions like Columbia and Harvard, highlighting tensions between and pluralism. This exposure contributed to broader cultural and political repudiation of unchecked progressive extremism, as evidenced by polling and electoral data showing prioritized concerns for and over identity grievances.

References

  1. https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/the-progressive-movement-and-the-transformation-american-politics
  2. https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/eras/civil-war-reconstruction/progressive-era/
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/progressivism
  4. https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/sites/ilr.law.uiowa.edu/files/2023-02/ILR-102-3-Hovenkamp_0.pdf
  5. https://iep.utm.edu/history/
  6. https://fee.org/articles/the-progressive-eras-derailment-of-classical-liberal-evolution/
  7. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-progressive-intellectual-tradition-in-america/
  8. https://www.goodmaninstitute.org/about/how-we-think/classical-liberalism-vs-modern-liberalism-and-modern-conservatism/
  9. https://minervawisdom.com/2023/05/16/understanding-progressivism/
  10. https://www.virtuescampus.com/history-in-shorts/is-human-nature-malleable-or-constant
  11. https://lawliberty.org/the-divide-between-jefferson-and-adams-on-human-nature-is-ours-too/
  12. https://www.heritage.org/progressivism
  13. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phc3.12769
  14. https://traversingtradition.com/2020/10/19/the-illusion-of-moral-progress/
  15. https://minervawisdom.com/2022/07/12/what-is-progressivism-a-philosophical-overview/
  16. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/progress/
  17. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/condorcet-outlines-of-an-historical-view-of-the-progress-of-the-human-mind
  18. https://sites.pitt.edu/~syd/progress.html
  19. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/
  20. https://iep.utm.edu/jeremy-bentham/
  21. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill-moral-political/
  22. https://www.untersoziologen.com/sociologists/working-in-the-18th-century/claude-henri-de-saint-simon
  23. https://www.marxists.org/archive/weisbord/conquest18.htm
  24. https://www.ushistory.org/us/43b.asp
  25. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/progressive-era-to-new-era-1900-1929/overview/
  26. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/square-deal-theodore-roosevelt-and-themes-progressive-reform
  27. https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-laws-and-you
  28. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/federal-reserve-act-signed
  29. https://www.history.com/articles/upton-sinclair-the-jungle-us-food-safety-reforms
  30. https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/essays/scientific-management/
  31. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/19th-amendment
  32. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/january-16/prohibition-ratified
  33. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/buck-v-bell/
  34. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/buck-v-bell-1927/
  35. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/social-security-act
  36. https://www.fdrlibrary.org/wagner-act
  37. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/medicare-and-medicaid-act
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4822720/
  39. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1093&context=ukcpr_papers
  40. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1082&context=econ_honproj
  41. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/history/us-history-ii/the-new-frontier-and-the-great-society/the-counterculture-of-the-1960s
  42. https://depts.washington.edu/moves/antiwar_intro.shtml
  43. https://www.siue.edu/~ptheodo/foundations/progressivism.html
  44. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/post-war-united-states-1945-1968/civil-rights-movement/
  45. https://library.law.howard.edu/civilrightshistory/blackrights/jimcrow
  46. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/pill-and-sexual-revolution/
  47. https://blogs.dickinson.edu/modern-us-history/changing-womens-roles-and-sexuality-the-progressive-era-through-the-1950s/
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12308156/
  49. https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty_pages/keith.chen/negot.%2520papers/Wolfers_Divorce03.pdf
  50. http://www.sfu.ca/~allen/divrate95-06.pdf
  51. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5215761
  52. https://blog.apaonline.org/2021/07/29/why-relativism-is-the-worst-idea-ever/
  53. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/706826
  54. https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-792
  55. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/whole-ball-of-tax-historical-income-tax-rates
  56. https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/labor-unions-and-the-us-economy
  57. https://archives.history.ac.uk/history-in-focus/welfare/articles/glennersterh.html
  58. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/inequality-total-war-great-leveller
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323342221_The_Effect_of_Progressive_Tax_on_Economic_Growth_Empirical_Evidence_from_European_OECD_Countries
  60. https://www.hoover.org/research/art-laffer-tax-policy-and-50-year-history-laffer-curve-art-laffer
  61. https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-whether-raising-the-minimum-wage-negatively-impacts-employment/
  62. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/UnionizationEconomicPerformance.pdf
  63. https://academic.oup.com/ej/article/130/631/1898/5824627
  64. https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp1007.pdf
  65. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/techno-progressivism
  66. https://morethandigital.info/en/techno-progressive-governance-how-governments-should-rethink-to-tackle-the-future/
  67. https://www.scifuture.org/what-is-technoprogressivism/
  68. https://americainclass.org/progressivism-in-the-factory/
  69. https://powellgifford.com/tag/efficiency-movement/
  70. https://criticalposthumanism.net/transhumanism/
  71. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03085147.2024.2439715
  72. https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/d8a015motoM7a
  73. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/cosmospolitanism-transhumanist-visions-of-global-order-from-the-first-world-war-to-the-digital-age/8D59A0488E2898368F2F1178E9941524
  74. https://trendsresearch.org/insight/the-perils-of-techno-hubris-when-innovation-outpaces-wisdom/
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-03560-x
  76. https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety/article/44/1/85/7684910
  77. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-primary-source/teddy-roosevelt-campaigns-third-term-1912
  78. https://millercenter.org/transforming-american-democracy-tr-and-bull-moose-campaign-1912
  79. https://progressives.house.gov/caucus-members
  80. https://berniesanders.com/
  81. https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/social-democratic-party-spd/
  82. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/politics97/parties/palab.shtml
  83. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09692290.2025.2576110
  84. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/latin-americas-authoritarian-drift-chavismo-after-chavez/
  85. https://theloop.ecpr.eu/a-second-pink-tide-rises-in-latin-america-but-will-it-last/
  86. https://www.prb.org/resources/clean-waters-historic-effect-on-u-s-mortality-rates-provides-hope-for-developing-countries/
  87. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/healthywater/drinking/history.html
  88. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4840a1.htm
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883035513000049
  90. https://www.history.com/articles/life-expectancy-rise-20th-century
  91. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056796.htm
  92. https://www.nber.org/bah/2004number2/social-security-and-elderly-poverty
  93. https://publicwise.org/publication/black-enfranchisement-after-the-voting-rights-act/
  94. https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/research/papers/2025/wp2528.pdf
  95. https://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/clandais/cgi-bin/Articles/WealthMigration_slides2021.pdf
  96. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w32153/w32153.pdf
  97. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/twenty-five-years-indian-economic-reform
  98. https://scientiatutorials.in/the-liberalization-of-the-indian-economy-in-1991-a-turning-point-in-economic-history/
  99. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00633.x
  100. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09750878231176260
  101. https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/the-first-conservatives-the-constitutional-challenge-progressivism
  102. https://lawliberty.org/conservative-progressivism/
  103. https://mises.org/mises-daily/end-socialism-and-calculation-debate-revisited
  104. https://theconversation.com/hayeks-road-to-serfdom-at-80-what-critics-get-wrong-about-the-austrian-economist-225489
  105. https://1cademy.com/node/hayeks-the-road-to-serfdom-central-planning-and-totalitarianism/rkLaXUIWdeHR8bxDnT7t
  106. https://blackpast.org/african-american-history/moynihan-report-1965/
  107. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/the-negro-family-the-case-for-national-action/
  108. https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/commentary/daniel-patrick-moynihans-unheeded-warning-about-the-collapse-the
  109. https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-820
  110. https://www.aaup.org/academe/issues/105-0/tale-two-arguments-about-free-speech-campus
  111. https://columbialawreview.org/content/can-free-speech-be-progressive/
  112. https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/so-speak-podcast-transcript-can-free-speech-be-progressive
  113. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1937-1945/american-isolationism
  114. https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v69n1/v69n1p45.html
  115. https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/10-25-13ss.pdf
  116. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-war-on-poverty-then-and-now/
  117. https://www.catf.us/2020/12/clean-air-act-at-50/
  118. https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/benefits-and-costs-clean-air-act-1970-1990-study-design-and-summary-results
  119. https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview
  120. https://www.commentary.org/articles/commentary-bk/losing-ground-american-social-policy-1950-1980-by-charles-murray/
  121. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23214255-losing-ground
  122. https://www.childtrends.org/publications/100-year-research-black-families
  123. https://www.facebook.com/groups/452866971950555/posts/1920284098542161/
  124. https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/fbi-statistics-show-30-increase-murder-2020-more-evidence-defunding
  125. https://x.com/i/grok/share/sq1LolCglQ61ivGR6zo6VwwbU
  126. https://nypost.com/2025/05/06/opinion/duh-study-shows-defund-the-police-resulted-in-more-killings/
  127. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/2572941/test-scores-have-barely-risen-since-1970-despite-245-spending-increase/
  128. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ltt/
  129. https://alec.org/article/test-scores-decline-despite-increased-education-spending/
  130. https://evans.uw.edu/new-evidence-from-the-seattle-minimum-wage-study/
  131. https://www.cato.org/regulation/winter-2017-2018/seattle-game-changer
  132. https://emmawiles.github.io/storage/Minimum_Wage_Increases_AEJEP.pdf
  133. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24181/w24181.pdf
  134. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/effects-rent-control-expansion-tenants-landlords-inequality
  135. https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/62cfde42-3fbc-4b6e-b308-c78dd32515e6/president-reagan-s-economic-legacy-great-expansion-oct-2000.pdf
  136. https://www.hoover.org/research/ten-causes-reagan-boom
  137. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
  138. https://www.law.columbia.edu/news/archive/kimberle-crenshaw-intersectionality-more-two-decades-later
  139. https://heterodoxacademy.org/blog/the-health-of-identity-politics-advocates/
  140. https://www.npr.org/2023/07/19/1188543449/what-does-the-word-woke-really-mean-and-where-does-it-come-from
  141. https://www.vox.com/culture/21437879/stay-woke-wokeness-history-origin-evolution-controversy
  142. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/06/25/attacking-merit-prescription-mediocrity/
  143. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/08/dei-washing-controversies-diversity-hiring-study
  144. https://tnc.news/2024/04/04/studies-diversity-corporate-performance-flawed/
  145. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/06/14/support-for-the-black-lives-matter-movement-has-dropped-considerably-from-its-peak-in-2020/
  146. https://news.gallup.com/poll/315962/americans-say-policing-needs-major-changes.aspx
  147. https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2025/05/07/views-of-race-policing-and-black-lives-matter-in-the-5-years-since-george-floyds-killing/
  148. https://www.aei.org/op-eds/attitudes-toward-the-police-five-years-after-george-floyds-death/
  149. https://news.gallup.com/poll/647303/confidence-institutions-mostly-flat-police.aspx
  150. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/06/trump-pennsylvania-michigan-wisconsin-00187855
  151. https://www.axios.com/2024/11/11/harris-biden-election-democratic-party-liberals
  152. https://politicalsciencenow.com/2024-post-election-reflection-series-decline-of-progressive-congressional-challengers-in-2024-suggests-there-wont-be-another-aoc/
  153. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/12/24/european-political-landscape-shifts-right-in-2024-as-far-right-gains-ground
  154. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/09/world/europe/european-parliament-elections-far-right.html
  155. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/how-will-gains-far-right-affect-european-parliament-and-eu
  156. https://www.adl.org/resources/report/anti-israel-activism-us-campuses-2023-2024
  157. https://bostonbar.org/journal/free-speech-on-college-campuses-legal-analysis-post-2023-24-pro-palestine-protests/
  158. https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/2024-student-encampment-protests
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.