Hubbry Logo
SugarSugarMain
Open search
Sugar
Community hub
Sugar
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sugar
Sugar
Sugar
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Sugars (clockwise from top-left): white refined, unrefined, brown, unprocessed cane sugar

Sugar is the generic name for sweet-tasting, soluble carbohydrates, many of which are used in food. Simple sugars, also called monosaccharides, include glucose, fructose, and galactose. Compound sugars, also called disaccharides or double sugars, are molecules made of two bonded monosaccharides; common examples are sucrose (glucose + fructose), lactose (glucose + galactose), and maltose (two molecules of glucose). White sugar is almost pure sucrose. During digestion, compound sugars are hydrolysed into simple sugars.

Longer chains of saccharides are not regarded as sugars, and are called oligosaccharides or polysaccharides. Starch is a glucose polymer found in plants – the most abundant source of energy in human food. Some other chemical substances, such as ethylene glycol, glycerol and sugar alcohols, may have a sweet taste, but are not classified as sugar.

Sugars are found in the tissues of most plants. Honey and fruits are abundant natural sources of simple sugars. Sucrose is especially concentrated in sugarcane and sugar beet, making them efficient for commercial extraction to make refined sugar. In 2016, the combined world production of those two crops was about two billion tonnes. Maltose may be produced by malting grain. Lactose is the only sugar that cannot be extracted from plants, as it occurs only in milk, including human breast milk, and in some dairy products. A cheap source of sugar is corn syrup, industrially produced by converting corn starch into sugars, such as maltose, fructose and glucose.

Sucrose is used in prepared foods (e.g., cookies and cakes), is sometimes added to commercially available ultra-processed food and beverages, and is sometimes used as a sweetener for foods (e.g., toast and cereal) and beverages (e.g., coffee and tea). Globally on average a person consumes about 24 kilograms (53 pounds) of sugar each year. North and South Americans consume up to 50 kg (110 lb), and Africans consume under 20 kg (44 lb).[1]

The use of added sugar in food and beverage manufacturing is a concern for elevated calorie intake, which is associated with an increased risk of several diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disorders.[2] In 2015, the World Health Organization recommended that adults and children reduce their intake of free sugars to less than 10% of their total energy intake, encouraging a reduction to below 5%.[3]

Etymology

[edit]

The etymology of sugar reflects the commodity's spread. From Sanskrit śarkarā, meaning "ground or candied sugar", came Persian shakar and Arabic sukkar. The Arabic word was borrowed in Medieval Latin as succarum, whence came the 12th century French sucre and the English sugar. Sugar was introduced into Europe by the Arabs in Sicily and Spain.[4]

The English word jaggery, a coarse brown sugar made from date palm sap or sugarcane juice, has a similar etymological origin: Portuguese jágara from the Malayalam cakkarā, which is from the Sanskrit śarkarā.[5]

History

[edit]
Main article: History of sugar
Sugar cane plantation

Sugar was first produced from sugar cane in the Indian subcontinent.[6] Diverse species of sugar cane seem to have originated from India (Saccharum barberi and S. edule) and New Guinea (S. officinarum).[7][8] Sugarcane is described in Chinese manuscripts dating to the 8th century BCE, which state that the use of sugarcane originated in India.[9]

Nearchus, admiral of Alexander the Great, the Greek physician Pedanius Dioscorides and the Roman Pliny the Elder also described sugar.[10] In the mid-15th century, sugar was introduced into Madeira and the Canary Islands, where it was mass produced. Christopher Columbus introduced it to the New World leading to sugar industries in Cuba and Jamaica by the 1520s.[11] The Portuguese took sugar cane to Brazil.

Beet sugar, the starting point for the modern sugar industry,[12] was a German invention.[13][14] Beet sugar was first produced industrially in 1801 in Cunern, Prussia.[14]

Sugar became a household item by the 19th century, and this evolution of taste and demand for sugar as an essential food ingredient resulted in major economic and social changes.[15][page needed] Demand drove, in part, the colonisation and industrialisation of previously under-developed lands. It was also intimately associated with slavery.[15][page needed] World consumption increased more than 100 times from 1850 to 2000, led by the United Kingdom, where it increased from about 2 pounds per head per year in 1650 to 90 pounds by the early 20th century.

Chemistry

[edit]
Sucrose: a disaccharide of glucose (left) and fructose (right)

Scientifically, sugar loosely refers to a number of compounds typically with the formula (CH2O)n. Some large classes of sugars, ranked in increasing order of molecular weight are monosaccharides, disaccharides, or oligosaccharides.

Monosaccharides

[edit]
Main article: monosaccharide

Monosaccharides are also called "simple sugars", the most important being glucose. Most monosaccharides have a formula that conforms to C
nH
2nO
n with n between 3 and 7 (deoxyribose being an exception). Glucose has the molecular formula C
6H
12O
6. The names of typical sugars end with -ose, as in "glucose" and "fructose". Such labels may also refer to any types of these compounds. Fructose, galactose, and glucose are all simple sugars, monosaccharides, with the general formula C6H12O6. They have five hydroxyl groups (−OH) and a carbonyl group (C=O) and are cyclic when dissolved in water. They each exist as several isomers with dextro- and laevo-rotatory forms that cause polarized light to diverge to the right or the left.[16]

  • Fructose, or fruit sugar, occurs naturally in fruits, some root vegetables, cane sugar and honey and is the sweetest of the sugars. It is one of the components of sucrose or table sugar. It is used as a high-fructose syrup, which is manufactured from hydrolyzed corn starch that has been processed to yield corn syrup, with enzymes then added to convert part of the glucose into fructose.[17]
  • Galactose generally does not occur in the free state but is a constituent with glucose of the disaccharide lactose or milk sugar. It is less sweet than glucose. It is a component of the antigens found on the surface of red blood cells that determine blood groups.[18]
  • Glucose occurs naturally in fruits and plant juices and is the primary product of photosynthesis. Starch is converted into glucose during digestion, and glucose is the form of sugar that is transported around the bodies of animals in the bloodstream. Although in principle there are two enantiomers of glucose (mirror images one of the other), naturally occurring glucose is D-glucose. This is also called dextrose, or grape sugar because drying grape juice produces crystals of dextrose that can be sieved from the other components.[19]

The acyclic monosaccharides (and disaccharides) contain either aldehyde groups or ketone groups. These carbon-oxygen double bonds (C=O) are the reactive centers. All saccharides with more than one ring in their structure result from two or more monosaccharides joined by glycosidic bonds with the resultant loss of a molecule of water (H
2O) per bond.[20]

Disaccharides

[edit]
Main article: disaccharide

Lactose, maltose, and sucrose are disaccharides, also called "compound sugars". The share the formula C12H22O11. They are formed by the condensation of two monosaccharide molecules with the expulsion of a molecule of water.[16]

  • Lactose is the naturally occurring sugar found in milk. A molecule of lactose is formed by the combination of a molecule of galactose with a molecule of glucose. It is broken down when consumed into its constituent parts by the enzyme lactase during digestion. Children have this enzyme but some adults no longer form it and they are unable to digest lactose.[21]
  • Maltose is formed during the germination of certain grains, the most notable being barley, which is converted into malt, the source of the sugar's name. A molecule of maltose is formed by the combination of two molecules of glucose. It is less sweet than glucose, fructose or sucrose.[16] It is formed in the body during the digestion of starch by the enzyme amylase and is itself broken down during digestion by the enzyme maltase.[22]
  • Sucrose is found in the stems of sugarcane and roots of sugar beet. It also occurs naturally alongside fructose and glucose in other plants, in particular fruits and some roots such as carrots. The different proportions of sugars found in these foods determines the range of sweetness experienced when eating them.[16] A molecule of sucrose is formed by the combination of a molecule of glucose with a molecule of fructose. After being eaten, sucrose is split into its constituent parts during digestion by a number of enzymes known as sucrases.[23]

Polysaccharides

[edit]
Main article: polysaccharides

Longer than disaccharides are oligosaccharides and polysaccharides. Cellulose and chitin are polymers, often crystalline, found in diverse plants and insects, respectively. Cellulose cannot be digested directly by animals. Starch is an amorphous polymer of glucose that is found in many plants and is widely used in the sugar industry.

Sources

[edit]

The sugar contents of common fruits and vegetables are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Sugar content of selected common plant foods (g/100g)[24]
Food item Total
carbohydrateA
including
dietary fiber 		Total
sugars 		Free
fructose 		Free
glucose 		Sucrose Fructose/
(Fructose+Glucose)
ratioB 		Sucrose
as a % of
total sugars
Fruits              
Apple 13.8 10.4 5.9 2.4 2.1 0.67 20
Apricot 11.1 9.2 0.9 2.4 5.9 0.42 64
Banana 22.8 12.2 4.9 5.0 2.4 0.5 20
Fig, dried 63.9 47.9 22.9 24.8 0.9 0.48 1.9
Grapes 18.1 15.5 8.1 7.2 0.2 0.53 1
Navel orange 12.5 8.5 2.25 2.0 4.3 0.51 51
Peach 9.5 8.4 1.5 2.0 4.8 0.47 57
Pear 15.5 9.8 6.2 2.8 0.8 0.67 8
Pineapple 13.1 9.9 2.1 1.7 6.0 0.52 61
Plum 11.4 9.9 3.1 5.1 1.6 0.40 16
Strawberry 7.68 4.89 2.441 1.99 0.47 0.55 10
Vegetables              
Beet, red 9.6 6.8 0.1 0.1 6.5 0.50 96
Carrot 9.6 4.7 0.6 0.6 3.6 0.50 77
Corn, sweet 19.0 6.2 1.9 3.4 0.9 0.38 15
Red pepper, sweet 6.0 4.2 2.3 1.9 0.0 0.55 0
Onion, sweet 7.6 5.0 2.0 2.3 0.7 0.47 14
Sweet potato 20.1 4.2 0.7 1.0 2.5 0.47 60
Yam 27.9 0.5 tr tr tr na tr
Sugar cane 13–18 0.2–1.0 0.2–1.0 11–16 0.50 high
Sugar beet 17–18 0.1–0.5 0.1–0.5 16–17 0.50 high
^A The carbohydrate figure is calculated in the USDA database and does not always correspond to the sum of the sugars, the starch, and the dietary fiber.[why?]
^B The fructose to fructose plus glucose ratio is calculated by including the fructose and glucose coming from the sucrose.

Production

[edit]
See also: List of sugars

Due to rising demand, sugar production in general increased some 14% over the period 2009 to 2018.[25] The largest importers were China, Indonesia, and the United States.[25]

Sugar

[edit]

In 2022–2023 world production of sugar was 186 million tonnes, and in 2023–2024 an estimated 194 million tonnes — a surplus of 5 million tonnes, according to Ragus.[26]

Sugarcane

[edit]
Sugarcane production – 2022
(millions of tonnes)
 Brazil 724.4
 India 439.4
 China 103.4
 Thailand 92.1
World 1,922.1
Source: FAO[27]

Sugar cane accounted for around 21% of the global crop production over the 2000–2021 period. The Americas was the leading region in the production of sugar cane (52% of the world total).[28] Global production of sugarcane in 2022 was 1.9 billion tonnes, with Brazil producing 38% of the world total and India 23% (table).

Sugarcane is any of several species, or their hybrids, of giant grasses in the genus Saccharum in the family Poaceae. They have been cultivated in tropical climates in the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia over centuries for the sucrose found in their stems.[6]

World production of raw sugar, main producers[29]

Sugar cane requires a frost-free climate with sufficient rainfall during the growing season to make full use of the plant's substantial growth potential. The crop is harvested mechanically or by hand, chopped into lengths and conveyed rapidly to the processing plant (commonly known as a sugar mill) where it is either milled and the juice extracted with water or extracted by diffusion.[30] The juice is clarified with lime and heated to destroy enzymes. The resulting thin syrup is concentrated in a series of evaporators, after which further water is removed. The resulting supersaturated solution is seeded with sugar crystals, facilitating crystal formation and drying.[30] Molasses is a by-product of the process and the fiber from the stems, known as bagasse,[30] is burned to provide energy for the sugar extraction process. The crystals of raw sugar have a sticky brown coating and either can be used as they are, can be bleached by sulfur dioxide, or can be treated in a carbonatation process to produce a whiter product.[30] About 2,500 litres (660 US gal) of irrigation water is needed for every one kilogram (2.2 pounds) of sugar produced.[31]

Sugar beet

[edit]
Sugar beet production – 2022
(millions of tonnes)
 Russia 48.9
 France 31.5
 United States 29.6
 Germany 28.2
World 260
Source: FAO[27]

In 2022, global production of sugar beets was 260 million tonnes, led by Russia with 18.8% of the world total (table).

Sugar beet became a major source of sugar in the 19th century when methods for extracting the sugar became available. It is a biennial plant,[32] a cultivated variety of Beta vulgaris in the family Amaranthaceae, the tuberous root of which contains a high proportion of sucrose. It is cultivated as a root crop in temperate regions with adequate rainfall and requires a fertile soil. The crop is harvested mechanically in the autumn and the crown of leaves and excess soil removed. The roots do not deteriorate rapidly and may be left in the field for some weeks before being transported to the processing plant where the crop is washed and sliced, and the sugar extracted by diffusion.[33] Milk of lime is added to the raw juice with calcium carbonate. After water is evaporated by boiling the syrup under a vacuum, the syrup is cooled and seeded with sugar crystals. The white sugar that crystallizes can be separated in a centrifuge and dried, requiring no further refining.[33]

Refining

[edit]
See also: Sugar refinery, Non-centrifugal cane sugar, and White sugar

Refined sugar is made from raw sugar that has undergone a refining process to remove the molasses.[34][35] Raw sugar is sucrose which is extracted from sugarcane or sugar beet. While raw sugar can be consumed, the refining process removes unwanted tastes and results in refined sugar or white sugar.[36][37]

The sugar may be transported in bulk to the country where it will be used and the refining process often takes place there. The first stage is known as affination and involves immersing the sugar crystals in a concentrated syrup that softens and removes the sticky brown coating without dissolving them. The crystals are then separated from the liquor and dissolved in water. The resulting syrup is treated either by a carbonatation or by a phosphatation process. Both involve the precipitation of a fine solid in the syrup and when this is filtered out, many of the impurities are removed at the same time. Removal of color is achieved by using either a granular activated carbon or an ion-exchange resin. The sugar syrup is concentrated by boiling and then cooled and seeded with sugar crystals, causing the sugar to crystallize out. The liquor is spun off in a centrifuge and the white crystals are dried in hot air and ready to be packaged or used. The surplus liquor is made into refiners' molasses.[38]

The International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis sets standards for the measurement of the purity of refined sugar, known as ICUMSA numbers; lower numbers indicate a higher level of purity in the refined sugar.[39]

Refined sugar is widely used for industrial needs for higher quality. Refined sugar is purer (ICUMSA below 300) than raw sugar (ICUMSA over 1,500).[40] The level of purity associated with the colors of sugar, expressed by standard number ICUMSA, the smaller ICUMSA numbers indicate the higher purity of sugar.[40]

Forms and uses

[edit]

Crystal size

[edit]
See also: Rock candy, Sucrose, and Powdered sugar
Misri crystals
Rock candy coloured with green dye
  • Coarse-grain sugar, also known as sanding sugar, composed of reflective crystals with grain size of about 1 to 3 mm, similar to kitchen salt. Used atop baked products and candies, it will not dissolve when subjected to heat and moisture.[41]
  • Granulated sugar (about 0.6 mm crystals), also known as table sugar or regular sugar, is used at the table, to sprinkle on foods and to sweeten hot drinks (coffee and tea), and in home baking to add sweetness and texture to baked products (cookies and cakes) and desserts (pudding and ice cream). It is also used as a preservative to prevent micro-organisms from growing and perishable food from spoiling, as in candied fruits, jams, and marmalades.[42]
  • Milled sugars such as powdered sugar (icing sugar) are ground to a fine powder. They are used for dusting foods and in baking and confectionery.[43][41]
  • Screened sugars such as caster sugar are crystalline products separated according to the size of the grains. They are used for decorative table sugars, for blending in dry mixes and in baking and confectionery.[43]

Densities

[edit]

The densities of culinary sugars varies owing to differences in particle size and inclusion of moisture:[44]

  • Beet sugar 0.80 g/mL
  • Dextrose sugar 0.62 g/mL ( = 620 kg/m^3)
  • Granulated sugar 0.70 g/mL
  • Powdered sugar 0.56 g/mL

Shapes

[edit]
Sugar cubes
  • Cube sugar (sometimes called sugar lumps) are white or brown granulated sugars lightly steamed and pressed together in block shape. They are used to sweeten drinks.[43]
  • Sugarloaf was the usual cone-form in which refined sugar was produced and sold until the late 19th century.[45]

Brown sugars

[edit]
Main article: Brown sugar
Brown sugar examples: Muscovado (top), dark brown (left), light brown (right)

Brown sugars are granulated sugars, either containing residual molasses, or with the grains deliberately coated with molasses to produce a light- or dark-colored sugar such as muscovado and turbinado. They are used in baked goods, confectionery, and toffees.[43] Their darkness is due to the amount of molasses they contain. They may be classified based on their darkness or country of origin.[41]

Liquid sugars

[edit]
A jar of honey with a dipper and a biscuit
  • Glucose syrup and corn syrup are widely used in the manufacture of foodstuffs. They manufactured from starch by enzymatic hydrolysis.[46] For example, corn syrup, which is produced commercially by breaking down maize starch, is one common source of purified dextrose.[47] Such syrups are use in producing beverages, hard candy, ice cream, and jams.[43]
  • Inverted sugar syrup, commonly known as invert syrup or invert sugar, is a mixture of two simple sugars—glucose and fructose—that is made by heating granulated sugar in water. It is used in breads, cakes, and beverages for adjusting sweetness, aiding moisture retention and avoiding crystallization of sugars.[43]
  • Molasses and treacle are obtained by removing sugar from sugarcane or sugar beet juice, as a byproduct of sugar production. They may be blended with the above-mentioned syrups to enhance sweetness and used in a range of baked goods and confectionery including toffees and licorice.[43]
  • In winemaking, fruit sugars are converted into alcohol by a fermentation process. If the must formed by pressing the fruit has a low sugar content, additional sugar may be added to raise the alcohol content of the wine in a process called chaptalization. In the production of sweet wines, fermentation may be halted before it has run its full course, leaving behind some residual sugar that gives the wine its sweet taste.[48]

Burnt sugars and caramels

[edit]

Heating sugar to near 200 °C for several minutes yields a product called burnt sugar. Often additives are used to modify the resulting caramels, e.g. alkali or sulfites. Several volatile products evolve in the heating process including butanone, several furans (2-Acetylfuran, furanone, hydroxymethyl furfural), and levoglucosan and more.[49]

Because sugars burn easily when exposed to flame, the handling of sugar powders risks dust explosion.[50] The 2008 Georgia sugar refinery explosion, which killed 14 people and injured 36, and destroyed most of the refinery, was caused by the ignition of sugar dust.[51]

Other sweeteners

[edit]
See also: Saccharin
  • Low-calorie sweeteners are often made of maltodextrin with added sweeteners. Maltodextrin is an easily digestible synthetic polysaccharide consisting of short chains of three or more glucose molecules and is made by the partial hydrolysis of starch.[52] Strictly, maltodextrin is not classified as sugar as it contains more than two glucose molecules, although its structure is similar to maltose, a molecule composed of two joined glucose molecules.
  • Polyols are sugar alcohols and are used in chewing gums where a sweet flavor is required that lasts for a prolonged time in the mouth.[53]

Consumption

[edit]

Worldwide sugar provides 10% of the daily calories (based on a 2000 kcal diet).[54] In 1750, the average Briton got 72 calories a day from sugar. In 1913, this had risen to 395. In 2015, sugar still provided around 14% of the calories in British diets.[55] According to one source, per capita consumption of sugar in 2016 was highest in the United States, followed by Germany and the Netherlands.[56]

Nutrition and flavor

[edit]
Sugar (sucrose), brown (with molasses)
Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)
Energy1,576 kJ (377 kcal)
97.33 g
Sugars96.21 g
Dietary fiber0 g
0 g
0 g
Vitamins and minerals
VitaminsQuantity
%DV†
Thiamine (B1)
1%
0.008 mg
Riboflavin (B2)
1%
0.007 mg
Niacin (B3)
1%
0.082 mg
Vitamin B6
2%
0.026 mg
Folate (B9)
0%
1 μg
MineralsQuantity
%DV†
Calcium
7%
85 mg
Iron
11%
1.91 mg
Magnesium
7%
29 mg
Phosphorus
2%
22 mg
Potassium
4%
133 mg
Sodium
2%
39 mg
Zinc
2%
0.18 mg
Other constituentsQuantity
Water1.77 g
Full link to USDA database entry
†Percentages estimated using US recommendations for adults,[57] except for potassium, which is estimated based on expert recommendation from the National Academies.[58]
Sugar (sucrose), granulated
Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)
Energy1,619 kJ (387 kcal)
99.98 g
Sugars99.91 g
Dietary fiber0 g
0 g
0 g
Vitamins and minerals
VitaminsQuantity
%DV†
Riboflavin (B2)
1%
0.019 mg
MineralsQuantity
%DV†
Calcium
0%
1 mg
Iron
0%
0.01 mg
Potassium
0%
2 mg
Other constituentsQuantity
Water0.03 g
Full link to USDA database entry
†Percentages estimated using US recommendations for adults,[57] except for potassium, which is estimated based on expert recommendation from the National Academies.[58]

Brown and white granulated sugar are 97% to nearly 100% carbohydrates, respectively, with less than 2% water, and no dietary fiber, protein or fat (table).[59] Because brown sugar contains 5–10% molasses reintroduced during processing, its value to some consumers is a richer flavor than white sugar.[60]

Health effects

[edit]

The World Health Organization and other clinical associations recommend that reducing the consumption of free sugar (sugar sources added during manufacturing) to less than 10% of total energy needs can help to lower disease risk.[2][3] This amount of sugar consumption is equivalent to about 50 g (1.8 oz) or 12 teaspoons of added sugar per day.[61] As of 2025, the American Heart Association recommends that free sugar intake be limited to 6% of total daily energy needs, or 36 g (1.3 oz) (9 teaspoons) for adult males, and 25 g (0.88 oz) (6 teaspoons) for women.[62] In many countries, the source and amount of added sugars can be viewed among ingredients on the labels of packaged foods.[62] Added sugars provide no nutritional benefit, but are a source of excess calories that can lead to overweight and increased disease risk.[2][3][61][62]

Obesity and metabolic syndrome

[edit]
Main article: Diet and obesity § Sugar consumption

A 2003 technical report by the World Health Organization provided evidence that high intake of sugary drinks (including fruit juice) increases the risk of obesity by adding to overall energy intake.[63] By itself, sugar is not a factor causing obesity and metabolic syndrome, but rather its excessive consumption adds to caloric burden, which meta-analyses showed could increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in adults and children.[64][65]

Cancer

[edit]

Sugar consumption does not directly cause cancer.[66][67][68] Cancer Council Australia have stated that "there is no evidence that consuming sugar makes cancer cells grow faster or cause cancer".[66] There is an indirect relationship between sugar consumption and obesity-related cancers through increased risk of excess body weight.[68][66][69]

The American Institute for Cancer Research and World Cancer Research Fund recommend that people limit sugar consumption.[70][71]

There is a popular misconception that cancer can be treated by reducing sugar and carbohydrate intake to supposedly "starve" tumours. In reality, the health of people with cancer is best served by maintaining a healthy diet.[72]

Cognition

[edit]

Despite some studies suggesting that sugar consumption causes hyperactivity, the quality of evidence is low[73] and it is generally accepted within the scientific community that the notion of children's 'sugar rush' is a myth.[74][75] A 2019 meta-analysis found that sugar consumption does not improve mood, but can lower alertness and increase fatigue within an hour of consumption.[76] One review of low-quality studies of children consuming high amounts of energy drinks showed association with higher rates of unhealthy behaviors, including smoking and excessive alcohol use, and with hyperactivity and insomnia, although such effects could not be specifically attributed to sugar over other components of those drinks such as caffeine.[77]

Tooth decay

[edit]

The WHO, Action on Sugar and the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) state dental caries, also known as tooth decay/cavities, "can be prevented by avoiding dietary free sugars".[3][78][79][80]

A review of human studies showed that the incidence of caries is lower when sugar intake is less than 10% of total energy consumed.[81] Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption is associated with an increased risk of tooth decay.[82]

Nutritional displacement

[edit]

The "empty calories" argument states that a diet high in added (or 'free') sugars will reduce consumption of foods that contain essential nutrients.[83] This nutrient displacement occurs if sugar makes up more than 25% of daily energy intake,[84] a proportion associated with poor diet quality and risk of obesity.[3] Displacement may occur at lower levels of consumption.[84]

[edit]

The WHO recommends that both adults and children reduce the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake.[3] "Free sugars" include monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods, and sugars found in fruit juice and concentrates, as well as in honey and syrups.[3][62]

On 20 May 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced changes to the Nutrition Facts panel displayed on all foods, to be effective by July 2018. New to the panel is a requirement to list "added sugars" by weight and as a percent of Daily Value (DV). For vitamins and minerals, the intent of DVs is to indicate how much should be consumed. For added sugars, the guidance is that 100% DV should not be exceeded. 100% DV is defined as 50 grams. For a person consuming 2000 calories a day, 50 grams is equal to 200 calories and thus 10% of total calories—the same guidance as the WHO.[85] To put this in context, most 12-US-fluid-ounce (355 ml) cans of soda contain 39 grams of sugar. In the United States, a government survey on food consumption in 2013–2014 reported that, for men and women aged 20 and older, the average total sugar intakes—naturally occurring in foods and added—were, respectively, 125 and 99 grams per day.[86] The American Heart Association recommends even lower daily consumption of added sugars: 36 grams for men, and 25 grams for women.[62]

Society and culture

[edit]

Manufacturers of sugary products, such as soft drinks and candy, and the Sugar Research Foundation have been accused of trying to influence consumers and medical associations in the 1960s and 1970s by creating doubt about the potential health hazards of sucrose overconsumption, while promoting saturated fat as the main dietary risk factor in cardiovascular diseases.[87] In 2016, the criticism led to recommendations that diet policymakers emphasize the need for high-quality research that accounts for multiple biomarkers on development of cardiovascular diseases.[87]

Originally, no sugar was white; anthropologist Sidney Mintz writes that white likely became understood as the ideal after groups who associated the color white with purity transferred their value to sugar.[88] In India, sugar frequently appears in religious observances. For ritual purity, such sugar cannot be white.[88]

[edit]
  • Brown sugar crystals
    Brown sugar crystals
  • Whole date sugar
    Whole date sugar
  • Whole cane sugar (grey), vacuum-dried
    Whole cane sugar (grey), vacuum-dried
  • Whole cane sugar (brown), vacuum-dried
    Whole cane sugar (brown), vacuum-dried
  • raw sugar closeup
    Raw crystals of unrefined, unbleached sugar

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

 This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA IGO 3.0 (license statement/permission). Text taken from World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023​, FAO, FAO.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sugar

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Sugar is a class of edible, crystalline carbohydrates, principally sucrose (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁), a disaccharide composed of one glucose and one fructose molecule linked by an acetal oxygen bridge. Sucrose, the predominant form of dietary sugar, is extracted primarily from sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), which accounts for approximately 80% of global production, and sugar beets (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris), contributing the remaining 20%. Worldwide output reached a record 189.3 million metric tons in the 2024/25 season, dominated by Brazil and India as the leading producers. As a concentrated source of calories (4 kcal per gram) devoid of vitamins, minerals, or fiber, sugar functions mainly as a sweetener, preservative, and bulking agent in foods and beverages, enhancing palatability and texture but promoting overconsumption due to its rapid digestion and lack of satiety signals. Excessive intake, particularly of fructose-containing sugars, drives hepatic de novo lipogenesis, insulin resistance, and visceral fat accumulation, causally contributing to the epidemics of obesity, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and cardiovascular disorders, as confirmed by umbrella reviews and meta-analyses of prospective cohorts and trials. Sugar's economic significance traces to ancient cultivation in around 8000 BCE, evolving into a that fueled colonial expansion, , and modern , while controversies persist over its addictive potential—evidenced by rodent models showing binging and withdrawal akin to drugs of abuse—and industry efforts to obscure health risks through funded research, paralleling tactics in and alcohol sectors. Despite these, sugar remains integral to global trade, with production concentrated in tropical and subtropical regions, and consumption patterns shifting toward in processed goods amid rising awareness of its metabolic toll.

Etymology and Terminology

Linguistic Origins

The English word "sugar" derives from the late 13th-century sugre, borrowed from sucre (attested around 1100 CE), which in turn came from succarum or zucchara. This Latin form originated from sukkar (سُكَّر), introduced to via Islamic trade routes during the medieval period. The Arabic term itself traces to šakar, reflecting the commodity's transmission westward from ancient . At its linguistic root, šakar stems from Sanskrit śarkarā (शर्करा), an ancient Indo-Aryan term meaning "grit," "pebble," or "gravel," which described the coarse, crystalline granules produced from sugarcane juice—a reference to the substance's texture rather than its sweetness. This etymon appears in Vedic texts as early as 1500–1200 BCE, where śarkarā denoted a sandy or ground product, evolving to specifically signify refined sugar by the time of classical Sanskrit literature around 500 BCE. The word's path illustrates phonetic adaptations across language families: from Indo-European Sanskrit through Indo-Iranian Persian to Semitic Arabic, with minimal semantic shift focused on the material's granular form. Cognates persist in modern languages, such as Italian zucchero, Spanish azúcar, and Portuguese açúcar, all retaining the Arabic-influenced al-sukkar prefix meaning "the sugar." In contrast, Germanic and Slavic terms like German Zucker or Russian saharnый followed similar borrowings, underscoring sugar's role as a traded luxury that disseminated its globally before widespread industrialization. Claims of alternative origins, such as a direct Chinese derivation from Sha-Che ("sand-sugar plant"), lack corroboration in primary linguistic reconstructions and contradict the documented Indo-European-to-Semitic trajectory supported by comparative philology.

Scientific and Common Definitions

In common usage, sugar refers to , the extracted primarily from () or sugar beets (), refined into white crystals or powder for use as a in foods and beverages. constitutes the majority of added sugars in diets, appearing as colorless crystals with a sweet and high in . This refined form, often termed table sugar, provides approximately 4 kilocalories per gram and is ubiquitous in processed products. Scientifically, sugar denotes a of carbohydrates—specifically, monosaccharides and disaccharides—that are sweet-tasting, soluble in , and capable of forming crystals. These compounds consist of carbon, , and oxygen atoms, typically in a approximating Cn(H2O)nC_n(H_2O)_n, and serve as energy sources in biological systems. Monosaccharides, the simplest sugars, include glucose (C6H12O6C_6H_{12}O_6), the primary cellular fuel, and , found in fruits; disaccharides like (C12H22O11C_{12}H_{22}O_{11}) form by condensation of two monosaccharides, with comprising one glucose and one fructose unit linked by a . Sucrose, the archetypal sugar, has a molecular weight of 342.30 g/mol, melts at 186°C, and decomposes before fully liquefying, exhibiting non-reducing properties due to the absence of free anomeric carbons. In broader biochemical classification, sugars exclude longer-chain like , focusing on those yielding 1–2 units upon . This distinction underscores sugars' rapid digestibility compared to complex carbohydrates.

Historical Development

Prehistoric to Ancient Civilizations

Prior to the widespread cultivation of , served as the primary natural sweetener for prehistoric humans, with archaeological evidence indicating its collection and use dating back thousands of years. Residues of in pottery fragments from the in provide the oldest direct evidence of honey hunting in , around 1500 BCE, suggesting it was a valued resource for its sweetness and caloric content. In Europe and the , cave paintings and artifacts from the era depict early interactions with bees, implying 's role in diets before . Sugarcane () originated from wild species like S. robustum and was first domesticated in approximately 8,000 to 10,000 years ago by Papuan peoples, who chewed the stalks for their sweet juice. This practice marked an early form of sugar consumption, though extraction and refining techniques had not yet developed. Austronesian voyagers spread sugarcane to , , and in prehistoric migrations, facilitating its dissemination across the Pacific. By around 1000 BCE, reached the , where it became integral to ancient and early processing methods. In , the term śarkarā referred to granular sugar derived from boiled cane juice, with evidence of crystallization emerging by 500 BCE through evaporation and cooling techniques that produced crude forms like khanda (). Ancient Indian texts, such as those from the , document sugarcane cultivation in regions like , predating large-scale refinement but indicating its use in rituals and medicine. The knowledge of sugarcane spread westward to Persia following Darius I's invasion of in 510 BCE, introducing the plant as a novel crop yielding "reeds that produce without bees." the Great's armies encountered sugarcane during their 326 BCE campaign in the , with soldiers noting its sweetness, though it remained a rarity in the Mediterranean world. In ancient , sugarcane appears in records from the (475–221 BCE), cultivated primarily for juice extraction rather than refined sugar. Across these civilizations, sugar was valued more as a medicinal substance or luxury than a staple, limited by labor-intensive harvesting and absence of mechanized processing.

Medieval Expansion and Trade

During the early medieval period, Arab expansions facilitated the widespread cultivation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) across the Mediterranean, building on techniques refined in Persia and India. Following conquests beginning in the 7th century, sugarcane was introduced to regions including Sicily, Cyprus, Malta, and the Barbary Coast, where irrigation systems and agricultural innovations enabled viable production in these semi-arid environments. In Sicily under Muslim rule from the 9th century, sugarcane fields expanded significantly, supported by water mills for crushing cane and boiling houses for extracting syrup, marking the industry's shift from localized Asian practices to large-scale Mediterranean output. Production involved harvesting mature cane, juice extraction via animal- or water-powered mills, clarification with lime, and crystallization in molds to yield raw sugar loaves, a labor-intensive process that yielded about 1-2% refined sugar by weight from the cane. By the , sugar emerged as a high-value from Islamic territories, traded northward to as a medicinal spice and luxury commodity, often commanding prices equivalent to by weight. Venetian merchants established early import records dating to 966 AD, sourcing refined sugar from Levantine ports like Tripoli and , while and competed in shipments from and . dominated this trade through naval prowess and treaties, with securing preferential access via alliances with , effectively monopolizing distribution to northern and inflating prices through tariffs and scarcity—up to 10 times the cost of . In , production peaked in the under Lusignan rule, with dozens of mills processing cane for , though yields remained limited by marginal soils and reliance on slave labor, producing an estimated several hundred tons annually at height. The Crusades (1095–1291) accelerated knowledge transfer, as European knights encountered sugar refineries in the , spurring demand and investment in Mediterranean plantations; however, political upheavals like the in and Sicily's Norman-Arab transitions disrupted local output by the late , foreshadowing the industry's migration to Atlantic islands. Trade volumes grew modestly, with Venetian convoys transporting thousands of pounds yearly, but sugar's status as "white gold" persisted due to inefficient yields—requiring 2-3 tons of cane per of loaf sugar—and vulnerability to frost, confining viable cultivation to coastal enclaves. This era's commerce laid foundational routes for sugar's later transatlantic scaling, intertwining economic incentives with colonial ambitions.

Industrialization and Modern Scaling

The industrialization of sugar production transitioned from small-scale, labor-intensive extraction to factory-based processing, driven by technological breakthroughs in both cane and beet refining during the late 18th and 19th centuries. In 1747, German chemist Andreas Sigismund Marggraf extracted sucrose from beets, proving it chemically identical to cane sugar and laying the groundwork for alternative sources independent of tropical imports. His protégé, Franz Karl Achard, advanced this by constructing the first industrial beet sugar refinery in 1801 at Cunern, Silesia (modern Poland), where it processed beets into crystallized sugar, albeit at low initial efficiency of about 4% from 400 tons annually. Napoleonic blockades on cane imports from 1806 spurred European governments to invest in beet factories, with France establishing its first viable plant in 1811 and expanding to over 40 by 1815 to achieve self-sufficiency. For sugarcane, which dominated earlier colonial production, 19th-century innovations mechanized refining and reduced costs. The centrifugal separator, introduced in the 1840s, rapidly separated massecuite into raw sugar and , replacing slower manual methods and enabling higher throughput in and mills. In 1846, inventor patented the multiple-effect evaporator, which reused across evaporators under to concentrate at lower temperatures, cutting consumption by up to 80% and minimizing sugar inversion. These efficiencies, combined with steam-powered mills and , scaled output; U.S. beet sugar factories emerged in by the 1870s, while cane plantations mechanized harvesting in the early 1900s. Modern scaling post-World War II leveraged agricultural revolutions, with hybrid varieties boosting yields from 30-40 tons per in the to over 80 tons today in leading regions. Global production hit record highs, forecasted at 189.3 million metric tons for 2024/25, up 8.6 million tons from prior years, driven by expanded acreage and processing capacity. leads with over 30% of output, producing around 40 million tons annually from vast Centro-Sul plantations optimized for both sugar and via integrated biorefineries. and follow, with 's output nearing 30 million tons amid government mandates for blending, while excels in efficiency through mechanized wet-season harvesting. Beet sugar persists in temperate zones like the EU and U.S., comprising about 20-25% of totals, supported by crop rotations and subsidies. Contemporary advancements include with AI for yield forecasting, for drought-resistant varieties, and automated factories using continuous centrifuges and Industry 4.0 controls to minimize waste and energy use. These technologies have enabled co-products like bagasse-derived power, with Brazilian mills generating surplus for grids, further incentivizing scale. Despite volatility from and trade policies, production continues expanding in and , outpacing consumption growth of 1-2% annually.

Chemical Composition

Monosaccharides and Building Blocks

Monosaccharides, also known as simple sugars, are the fundamental units of carbohydrates, characterized by a single polyhydroxylated or chain that cannot be further hydrolyzed by enzymatic action. They typically follow the CnH2nOnC_nH_{2n}O_n, where nn ranges from 3 to 7, with hexoses (n=6n=6) being predominant in dietary sugars. These molecules exist predominantly in cyclic forms in solution, such as or rings, due to intramolecular reactions between the and a hydroxyl group. The most prevalent monosaccharides in common sugars include , , and , all aldo- or ketohexoses with the molecular formula C6H12O6C_6H_{12}O_6. , an , features an group at carbon 1 and predominantly adopts a six-membered ring in equilibrium with its open-chain form, serving as a key energy source in . , a , possesses a group at carbon 2 and favors a five-membered ring, contributing a sweeter profile than due to its structural affinity for receptors. , structurally similar to as an but differing in the hydroxyl group configuration at carbon 4, is less common in free form but integral to . In sucrose (table sugar), the building blocks are one α\alpha-D-glucopyranose unit and one β\beta-D-fructofuranose unit, joined by an OO-α\alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→\rightarrow2)-β\beta-D-fructofuranoside glycosidic linkage that renders the anomeric carbons non-reducing. Hydrolysis of sucrose, as occurs in digestion via invertase, yields equimolar glucose and fructose (inverted sugar syrup), demonstrating their role as monomeric precursors. Other monosaccharides like ribose (a pentose, C5H10O5C_5H_{10}O_5) form the backbone of nucleic acids but are not primary components of nutritive sugars.
MonosaccharideFunctional GroupRing Form PreferenceKey Sources or Role
Glucose (aldose) (6-membered) hydrolysis, blood glucose
Fructose (ketose) (5-membered), fruits, component
Galactose (aldose) (6-membered) in dairy
These exhibit optical isomerism, with D-forms biologically relevant in nature, influencing their reactivity and metabolic pathways.

Disaccharides and Complex Forms

Disaccharides consist of two units joined by a , resulting in carbohydrates with the general formula C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁. , the predominant in refined sugar, comprises one α-D-glucose unit linked to one β-D-fructose unit via an α-1,2- between the anomeric carbons of each . This linkage renders a non-reducing sugar, as both anomeric carbons are involved in the bond, preventing reaction with oxidizing agents like Benedict's solution. Other disaccharides include , formed by an α-1,4-glycosidic bond between two glucose units and produced during , and , composed of β-D-galactose and D-glucose linked by a β-1,4-glycosidic bond, found in . However, in the context of common sugar sources like and sugar beets, dominates, comprising up to 15-20% of the plant's fresh weight in mature stalks. Complex forms of carbohydrates extend beyond disaccharides to oligosaccharides and . Oligosaccharides contain 3 to 10 units, often branched, and occur in sugar processing byproducts like , where trisaccharides such as (galactose-glucose-fructose) contribute to residual sweetness. , polymers of hundreds to thousands of units, include (a glucose polymer with α-1,4 and α-1,6 linkages) and (β-1,4-linked glucose, indigestible by humans). These complex structures serve as (e.g., in animals, in ) or structural components (e.g., in exoskeletons), and enzymatic can yield simpler sugars for industrial use. In sugar production, from cell walls complicate extraction, requiring mechanical and chemical processing to isolate .

Key Physical Properties

Sucrose, the primary form of refined , appears as a white, odorless, crystalline or powdery solid at . It exhibits a density of 1.587 g/cm³, making it denser than . The compound possesses a monoclinic , which contributes to its stability in solid form. Sucrose does not have a distinct ; instead, it decomposes at approximately 186°C (459 K), undergoing thermal degradation to form products rather than liquifying. It is highly soluble in , with reaching about 200 g per 100 mL at 20°C, increasing with , but it shows limited solubility in (around 0.6%) and (1%). This high aqueous stems from its polar molecular structure, facilitating dissolution in polar solvents.
PropertyValue
AppearanceWhite crystalline/powdery solid
Density1.587 g/cm³
Crystal systemMonoclinic
Decomposition temperature186°C (459 K)
Water solubility (20°C)~200 g/100 mL

Sources and Production

Primary Natural Sources

The primary natural sources for commercial production are () and sugar beets ( subsp. vulgaris). These plants are selected for their high sucrose concentrations compared to other vegetation, enabling efficient extraction for refined sugar. Globally, supplies approximately 80% of , while sugar beets provide the remaining 20%. Sugarcane, a tropical grass originating from , accumulates primarily in its stalks, which can reach heights of 3-6 meters. The stalks contain juice with 10-21% by fresh weight, extracted through crushing. Cultivation occurs in subtropical and tropical regions, with major producers including , , and . Sugar beets, a root crop developed in temperate climates unsuitable for sugarcane, store sucrose in their swollen taproots, typically comprising 15-20% sucrose on a fresh weight basis at harvest. Originating from selective breeding in 18th-century Europe, beets are grown in cooler areas like Europe and North America, with roots sliced and diffused to release the sugar-laden juice. While sucrose occurs naturally in fruits, vegetables, and other plants such as apples, , and carrots at lower concentrations (often under 10%), these are not viable for large-scale commercial extraction due to inefficient yields. Minor sources like sorghum stalks or date palm sap contribute negligibly to global production.

Agricultural Practices

Sugar is derived agriculturally from two primary crops: sugarcane ( spp.), a tropical grass accounting for approximately 80% of global production, and sugar beets ( subsp. vulgaris), a temperate biennial root crop contributing the remaining share. Sugarcane cultivation predominates in tropical and subtropical regions such as , , and , where it is propagated vegetatively using stem cuttings known as setts, planted manually or mechanically in rows spaced 0.9 to 1.5 meters apart. The crop matures in 12 to 18 months for the plant cane harvest, followed by ratoon crops from regrowth of stubble, typically yielding 4 to 6 cycles before replanting due to declining productivity from soil exhaustion and pest buildup. Sugarcane requires well-drained, fertile soils with 6.0 to 7.5 and high , often supplemented with , , and fertilizers at rates of 100-200 kg N/ha, alongside in areas with less than 1,500 mm annual rainfall to support its high demand of 1,500-2,500 mm per crop cycle. Pest management includes chemical controls for borers and diseases like smut, while harvesting involves manual cutting in labor-intensive regions or mechanical harvesters in mechanized operations, extracting stalks at 60-80% of total to minimize disruption. Average yields range from 60-70 tonnes of cane per globally, with peaks exceeding 100 tonnes/ha in optimized systems in and through improved varieties and precision inputs. Sugar beet farming occurs in temperate zones between 30° and 60° latitude, primarily in and the , where monogerm or multigerm seeds are precision-planted in spring using vacuum or air planters at 80,000-100,000 per in rows 50-60 cm apart. The crop grows for 5-6 months, with roots harvested mechanically by topping leaves and lifting beets, aiming for high content of 15-20% in roots weighing 1-5 kg each. It demands neutral to slightly alkaline soils ( 6.5-7.5) with moderate fertility, applying 100-150 kg N/ha, and in dry conditions to achieve yields of 50-80 tonnes of beets per , translating to 10-12 tonnes of sugar per in efficient European systems. Disease control targets rhizomania and cercospora via resistant varieties and fungicides, with reduced increasingly adopted to preserve and incorporate cover crops.

Refining and Processing Techniques

Sugar refining from sugarcane begins at the mill, where harvested stalks are shredded and crushed to extract , typically yielding about 100-120 gallons of per of cane. The undergoes clarification by adding lime to neutralize acids and precipitate impurities, followed by heating and to remove . This clarified is then concentrated through multi-stage under to form a thick , which is seeded with sugar crystals to initiate in pans. The resulting massecuite—a mixture of crystals and —is centrifuged to separate the raw sugar crystals, which are then dried and stored; this raw sugar contains about 96-98% and residual . Further refining of raw sugar occurs in dedicated refineries, starting with affination where the raw sugar is mixed with syrup and centrifuged to wash off outer molasses layers. The affined sugar is dissolved in hot water to form a liquor, which is purified using carbonation (adding lime and carbon dioxide to form insoluble calcium saccharate precipitates) or phosphatation (using phosphoric acid and lime), followed by filtration through bone char or granular carbon to decolorize and remove organic impurities. The purified liquor is evaporated to syrup and crystallized in multiple stages—often three to four "strikes" or boils—to maximize sucrose recovery, with each stage's lower-grade massecuite processed further via centrifugation and remelting. Final white sugar crystals, achieving over 99.9% sucrose purity, are centrifuged, washed with fine water sprays, dried in rotary or band dryers, and screened for uniformity before packaging. Sugar beet processing differs primarily in juice extraction via diffusion rather than crushing, as beets are sliced into cossettes and steeped in hot water at 70-80°C to osmotically draw out sucrose-rich juice, extracting about 98% of the beet's sugar content. The raw juice, containing 10-14% sucrose, is purified through liming to pH 11 to coagulate proteins and add carbon dioxide for carbonatation, forming chalk precipitates that trap impurities; this is followed by hot filtration and sometimes cold saturation for additional impurity removal. Evaporation reduces the juice to 60-70% solids syrup under vacuum, after which crystallization proceeds in three stages similar to cane, but beets yield directly refined sugar without a raw intermediate, with molasses separated via centrifuges and the pulp byproduct dried for animal feed. Modern efficiencies, such as Norbert Rillieux's multiple-effect evaporator invented in the 1840s, recycle steam across evaporation stages, reducing energy use by up to 80% compared to single-effect systems. Variations in processing yield different sugar forms: retains more molasses post-centrifugation, while refined undergoes extensive decolorization; ion-exchange resins are increasingly used in cane refining for final liquor polishing to remove residual ions without chemical additives. Overall recovery rates average 85-90% from cane and 80-85% from beets, with byproducts like (cane fiber) used for and beet pulp for feed.

Forms and Applications

Structural Variations

Sucrose, the predominant form of table sugar, crystallizes in a monoclinic structure, typically forming elongated prismatic shapes that determine its handling and dissolution characteristics. These crystals vary in size and uniformity based on controlled cooling rates, seeding techniques, and levels during refining, allowing for tailored applications in food production. Uniform crystal size is critical for efficient , as irregular shapes can lead to caking or poor flowability in industrial handling. Granulated features medium-sized crystals, approximately 0.3 to 0.5 mm in diameter, providing a balance of and volume in and cooking. Finer variants, such as or superfine sugar, have crystals reduced to about 0.2 mm or smaller through grinding or rapid , enabling faster dissolution in cold liquids and lighter textures in meringues and cocktails. Coarse sugars, including sanding and , possess larger crystals exceeding 0.6 mm, often retained from less refined syrups, which resist melting and are used for decorative purposes or crunch in toppings. Powdered or confectioners' sugar represents an amorphous structure achieved by pulverizing to a dust-like ( under 0.1 mm), frequently blended with 3% cornstarch to inhibit recrystallization and clumping in humid conditions. Brown sugars maintain crystalline cores but incorporate films the surfaces, resulting in irregular, sticky aggregates that impart flavor and retention in recipes like . exemplifies extreme structural variation with oversized, transparent grown slowly over days via string or stick , yielding pure prisms up to several centimeters long for ornamental or slow-dissolving uses. Compressed forms, such as , consist of densely packed fine granules bound by minor wetting and drying, forming rigid blocks without altering the underlying lattice. These structural differences directly impact functional properties: smaller crystals enhance creaming with fats and aeration in batters due to increased surface area, while larger ones minimize inversion during heating, preserving sweetness in caramels. Industrial producers adjust massecuite and pan operations to target specific morphologies, ensuring consistency across batches.

Culinary and Household Uses

Sugar functions in culinary preparations primarily as a , balancing acidity and enhancing flavor in dishes ranging from desserts to savory sauces. It contributes to texture by adding bulk, , and , as seen in frostings, candies, and syrups. In beverages, sugar dissolves readily to sweeten hot drinks like and or cold ones like sodas, where it also stabilizes emulsions and prevents . In baking, sugar interacts with other ingredients to influence structure and appearance. As a , it attracts and retains moisture, keeping cakes, cookies, and breads soft over time. It tenderizes batters by interfering with formation, promotes through creaming with fats to incorporate air, and facilitates leavening by feeding in doughs, producing for rise. During heating, sugar enables above 160°C and participates in the with proteins for browning and complex flavors in pastries and breads. Sugar preserves foods by lowering , depriving microbes of free water needed for growth, which is critical in high-sugar products like jams, jellies, and . In these, concentrations above 60% sugar by weight inhibit and molds, maintaining without . It also serves as a fermentation substrate in , , and wine production, where yeasts convert it to alcohol and gases. Beyond cooking, sugar finds household applications for non-food purposes. Mixed with oils, it forms exfoliating scrubs for skin, leveraging its granular texture to remove dead cells without harsh abrasion. As a mild abrasive, it cleans greasy surfaces or removes grass stains from fabrics when combined with vinegar or water. In minor first aid, a spoonful can soothe a burned tongue by drawing heat through osmosis, though medical attention is advised for serious injuries.

Industrial and Non-Food Applications

Sugar, primarily in the form of , functions as a versatile feedstock in processes to produce biofuels such as . derived from or sugar beets undergoes microbial , typically by yeast strains like , yielding that is distilled for use as a additive or pure fuel. This application leverages 's ready into glucose and , which microorganisms metabolize anaerobically, with global bioethanol production from sugar crops exceeding 100 billion liters annually as of 2022, driven largely by and the . Beyond , yields platform chemicals like , , and , used in solvents, polymers, and bioplastics. In pharmaceuticals, sucrose acts as an for tablet formulation, providing bulk, compressibility, and taste-masking for bitter active ingredients. It also serves as a and in syrups and injectables, stabilizing formulations by reducing and inhibiting microbial growth, with invert sugar (hydrolyzed ) specifically employed for its properties. esters, chemically modified from , function as non-ionic in systems, enhancing and of poorly water-soluble compounds. Sucrose and its derivatives find applications in and detergents as humectants, emulsifiers, and mild . In skincare products, maintains moisture by binding water molecules, while sucrose esters provide foaming and cleansing without irritating , used in shampoos and body washes. These sugar-based offer biodegradability advantages over petroleum-derived alternatives, aligning with regulatory preferences for eco-friendly ingredients in the . In the , sucrose undergoes thermochemical or catalytic conversion to produce intermediates like , which serves as a precursor for pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and synthetic rubbers. Sucrose also contributes to and production through or esterification, where its viscosity and binding properties enhance formulation stability. Other niche uses include as a carbon source for microbial and brickmaking as a to improve workability of clay mixtures. These applications collectively represent a minor but growing fraction of global sucrose demand, estimated at under 5% of production, emphasizing efficiency in resource allocation for non-food sectors.

Consumption and Economics

Global Production and Trade

Global sugar production for the 2024/25 marketing year is forecasted at 180.8 million metric tons, reflecting revisions downward from earlier estimates due to factors including reduced output in . This volume is dominated by sugarcane-derived sugar, which accounts for approximately 80% of total production, primarily from tropical and subtropical regions, while sugar beets contribute the remainder in temperate climates. and lead as the largest producers, together representing about 39% of global output, with 's production reaching 43.7 million metric tons and 's at 28 million metric tons.
Country/RegionProduction (million metric tons, 2024/25)Share of Global (%)
43.724
2815
16.59
116
10.046
8.455
Sugar trade flows from surplus-producing nations to those with deficits, with raw sugar often exported for refining in importing countries. dominates exports, shipping tens of millions of tons annually, supported by its vast plantations and flexible production between sugar and . Other key exporters include , , , and , collectively accounting for over two-thirds of global sugar exports by value in recent years. Leading importers are , the , , , and , driven by domestic consumption exceeding local production; for instance, imported sugar valued at $2.7 billion in 2023 data, reflecting high demand in and beverages. Trade dynamics are influenced by weather variability, policy shifts such as mandates, and currency fluctuations, which can lead to annual surpluses or shortages affecting prices.

Dietary Intake Patterns

Global per capita sugar availability, a proxy for consumption, averaged approximately 22.5 kg annually in 2022, equivalent to about 62 grams per day, though direct intake surveys indicate variability due to waste and other factors. The (WHO) recommends limiting free sugars—defined as monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods and beverages, plus those in , syrups, and fruit juices—to less than 10% of total daily energy intake, or ideally under 5%, corresponding to roughly 50 grams (12 teaspoons) or 25 grams (6 teaspoons) for a 2,000-calorie diet. Actual intakes frequently exceed these thresholds; for instance, in the WHO European Region, reported adult daily free sugars consumption surpassed 5% of energy intake across all surveyed countries. In high-income countries, consumption remains elevated, with the leading at 126.4 grams daily as of recent estimates, followed by (102.9 grams) and the (102.5 grams). Lower-income regions show lower but rising levels; projections indicate Africa's intake reaching 15.6 kg annually and Asia's 21.2 kg by 2034, both trailing the global average of 23.5 kg due to expanding processed food markets. Disparities persist by within countries, with higher intakes among urban and higher-income groups in developing nations, driven by increased availability of sugary beverages and snacks. Historical trends reveal a general upward trajectory in global consumption since the mid-20th century, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where use has grown alongside and . In the United States, added sugars intake rose from 111 grams daily in 1970 to 131 grams in 1996 before stabilizing or slightly declining amid campaigns, though total sugars from ultra-processed foods continue to dominate. Recent data from packaged foods sales suggest a 0.5 kg increase in added sugars between 2007 and 2019 globally, concentrated in . Added sugars constitute the majority of intake patterns, primarily from ultra-processed sources, which account for nearly 90% of added sugars' energy contribution in diets like the U.S. Sweetened beverages, including soft drinks (17.1% of U.S. added sugars) and drinks (13.9%), rank as the leading category, followed by desserts, sweet snacks, and products such as cakes and . Processed foods like cereals, sauces, and yogurts embed sugars covertly, amplifying intake beyond obvious sweets; for example, ready-to-eat cereals contribute 3-6% of added sugars while providing variable nutrient density.
Top Sources of Added Sugars in U.S. Diets (Approximate % of Total)Contribution
Soft drinks and sweetened beverages17-30%
Desserts and sweet snacks (e.g., , )15-20%
Fruit drinks and milk-based sweetened beverages10-14%
Bakery products (e.g., cakes, pastries)10-12%
Candies and sugars5-8%
This table draws from national survey data, highlighting beverages' outsized role despite comprising liquid calories with minimal . Patterns vary by age and demographics, with children deriving up to 90% of added sugars from ultra-processed items, underscoring the influence of and convenience foods on habitual consumption.

Market Dynamics and Pricing

The global sugar market exhibits high volatility due to its dependence on agricultural cycles, weather variability, and policy interventions in key producing regions. Raw sugar prices are benchmarked primarily through the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) Sugar No. 11 futures contract, denominated in U.S. cents per pound, which reflects anticipated supply from tropical exporters like Brazil and India against steady demand from food processing and emerging biofuel sectors. White refined sugar trades via ICE Sugar No. 5 contracts, often at a premium influenced by refining costs and regional tariffs. These futures markets incorporate forward expectations, with prices adjusting to factors like harvest forecasts and currency fluctuations; for example, a stronger U.S. dollar in late 2024 pressured exporter revenues, contributing to a 4.2% monthly decline in ICE #5 March 2025 white sugar contracts. Supply-side dynamics dominate price swings, as production—accounting for over 80% of global output—remains vulnerable to El Niño-induced droughts and frosts in , the world's largest exporter. In the 2023/24 season, Brazilian output fell short by approximately 5 million metric tons due to dry conditions, exacerbating a global deficit of 4.7 million metric tons and driving ICE No. 11 prices above 30 cents per pound in early 2024. Conversely, improved monsoons in , the top producer, and policy shifts allowing freer exports from mid-2024 onward boosted global stocks, leading to price retreats; by October 2025, ICE No. 11 spot prices had dropped to 14.96 cents per pound, a 32.3% decline from yearly highs amid projections of a 2.8 million metric ton surplus for 2025/26. India's export bans during 2022-2023, justified by domestic shortages, similarly constricted supply and inflated prices, illustrating how state controls in populous producers can override market signals. Demand elasticity is relatively inelastic for caloric sweeteners in developing economies but competes with substitutes like in the U.S. and , where protective quotas and subsidies distort local pricing; U.S. refined sugar quotas, for instance, maintain domestic prices 2-3 times above world levels to shield beet growers. diversion adds causal pressure: Brazilian mills prioritize when crude exceeds $80 per barrel, as in , reducing sugar yields by up to 10 million tons annually and correlating with spikes. Geopolitical disruptions, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict elevating European import needs, further amplify short-term volatility, though long-term trends favor surplus as yields improve via varietal advances and irrigation. Overall, the market's pricing reflects a tug-of-war between episodic shortages and structural oversupply, with 2024's initial rally from 23-27 cents per pound giving way to declines as Brazilian crushing data signaled record harvests.
PeriodKey Price Event (ICE No. 11, cents/lb)Primary Driver
Early 2024Rise to >30Brazilian weather deficits, global deficit of 4.7 MMT
Mid-2024Peak and retreat to ~20Indian export easing, improved yields
Oct 2025Fall to 14.96Anticipated 2025/26 surplus, Brazilian output surge

Nutritional Physiology

Metabolic Pathways

Sucrose, the primary form of dietary sugar, is a composed of one glucose and one molecule linked by an α-1,4 . In the , it undergoes in the via the sucrase-isomaltase, yielding equimolar amounts of D-glucose and D- for absorption. Glucose is absorbed actively through the sodium-glucose linked transporter 1 (SGLT1) coupled with passive facilitative diffusion via GLUT2, while enters primarily via and secondarily via GLUT2. Absorbed glucose enters the portal bloodstream and is distributed systemically, where it serves as a central fuel for cellular energy production. In most tissues, glucose is phosphorylated by hexokinase (or glucokinase in liver) to glucose-6-phosphate, initiating glycolysis—a 10-step anaerobic pathway that converts one glucose molecule to two pyruvate molecules, generating a net yield of 2 ATP and 2 NADH per glucose. Under aerobic conditions, pyruvate is decarboxylated to acetyl-CoA by pyruvate dehydrogenase, entering the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle for further ATP production via oxidative phosphorylation; in anaerobic states, pyruvate is reduced to lactate. Excess glucose is stored as glycogen through glycogenesis or converted to fatty acids via de novo lipogenesis in the liver, while gluconeogenesis reciprocally synthesizes glucose from non-carbohydrate precursors like lactate, glycerol, and glucogenic amino acids, primarily in the liver and kidneys to maintain blood glucose homeostasis during fasting. Key regulatory enzymes include phosphofructokinase-1 (activated by AMP and inhibited by ATP/citrate in glycolysis) and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (oppositely regulated in gluconeogenesis), ensuring reciprocal control to prevent futile cycling. Fructose metabolism differs markedly, occurring predominantly in the liver due to its low affinity for extrahepatic hexokinases. Upon hepatic uptake via GLUT2, is phosphorylated by fructokinase (ketohexokinase) to fructose-1-phosphate, consuming ATP without allosteric feedback. then cleaves fructose-1-phosphate into (DHAP) and ; the latter is phosphorylated by triokinase to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G3P), both entering distal to the phosphofructokinase-1 regulatory step. This unregulated influx allows rapid flux toward hepatic when intake exceeds processing capacity, with DHAP convertible to triglycerides via conversion to glycerol-3-phosphate and from pyruvate. In , hepatic fructose-1-phosphate levels rise approximately 10-fold to 1 mM within 10 minutes of ingestion, sustaining elevation and potentially promoting accumulation if chronic. Minimal occurs in other tissues, underscoring the liver's central role and its implications for dose-dependent effects on . Despite these mechanistic differences in glucose and fructose metabolism, recent studies and expert consensus indicate no major differences in overall metabolic effects among common added sugars, such as sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup, when consumed in equicaloric amounts, with emphasis placed on moderation of total intake rather than type selection. Systematic reviews have found equivalent impacts on anthropometric measures like weight and BMI, lipid profiles, and insulin sensitivity.

Caloric and Sensory Contributions

Sucrose, the predominant form of table sugar, yields approximately 4 kilocalories per gram upon metabolism, equivalent to 387-388 kilocalories per 100 grams, as it is fully digestible and provides energy solely from its content without associated macronutrients like or protein. This caloric density arises from its into and in the digestive tract, where each is absorbed and oxidized for ATP production, contributing rapidly available energy comparable to other simple carbohydrates but lacking or micronutrients. In dietary contexts, added sugars from account for variable caloric intake shares, often 10-15% of total daily energy in Western diets, functioning as a concentrated source that elevates overall in processed foods without signals from bulk or protein. Sensorily, sugar's primary contribution stems from its activation of the heterodimeric T1R2/T1R3 G-protein-coupled receptors on cells in the oral cavity, initiating a signaling cascade involving Cβ2 and M5 to depolarize cells and transmit sweet perception via afferent nerves. serves as the benchmark for intensity at a relative value of 1.0, with exhibiting 1.1-1.7 times greater potency and glucose approximately 0.7-0.8 times, influencing perceived flavor profiles where higher concentrations enhance initial onset but may lead to adaptation. Beyond isolated , sugar modulates palatability by balancing flavors, improving mouthfeel through and humectancy, and suppressing bitterness, thereby increasing overall acceptability and consumption volume in formulations like beverages and confections. This sensory enhancement drives hedonic responses, as evidenced by studies showing elevated intake of sugar-fortified items due to amplified liking rather than mere caloric signaling.

Health Implications

Empirical Benefits and Neutral Effects

Dietary sugar, particularly , serves as a rapidly absorbable source of energy, delivering approximately 4 kilocalories per gram through its into glucose and in the . This quick supports acute physical performance, as evidenced by randomized controlled trials showing that ingestion, including forms derived from sugar, at rates of 30 to 80 grams per hour during exercise enhances time-to-exhaustion and overall output by maintaining euglycemia and delaying depletion. Similarly, in resistance training exceeding 45 minutes, acute sugar-containing feeding increases training volume without impairing strength metrics. In cognitive domains, empirical evidence from systematic reviews of interventional studies demonstrates that acute glucose supplementation—often from sucrose sources—facilitates enhancements in and attentional processes among healthy adults, particularly under conditions of mental demand or mild glucoprivation. A of such trials further confirms modest benefits for immediate verbal recall and reaction times following 25-50 grams of glucose, with effects more pronounced in tasks requiring rapid processing. These outcomes align with glucose's role as the brain's primary metabolic fuel, consuming about 120 grams daily in adults at rest. Neutral effects emerge prominently in isocaloric substitution trials, where replacing sugars with other carbohydrates yields no significant impact on body weight, as sugars' caloric density drives intake-related gains rather than inherent metabolic toxicity. Network meta-analyses of controlled feeding studies similarly report minimal differences in cardiometabolic markers like insulin sensitivity, , or when sucrose or substitutes isocalorically, though some substitutions modestly lower LDL . Overall, these findings indicate that sugar exerts no unique adverse influence beyond total energy balance in energy-matched diets, underscoring calorie intake as the primary mediator.

Dose-Dependent Risks: Metabolic and Cardiovascular

While a single high-sugar binge in healthy individuals produces transient acute effects such as temporary blood sugar spikes, insulin release, energy crashes, bloating, headaches, or fatigue, these resolve without significant long-term health impacts; risks such as insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease arise from chronic, repeated high sugar consumption rather than isolated incidents. Excessive intake of added sugars, particularly fructose-containing sources like and , promotes hepatic through rapid metabolism in the liver, bypassing regulation and driving de novo , accumulation, and . This mechanism contributes to dose-dependent impairments in glucose , with studies showing that even moderate consumption (e.g., 25% of energy from fructose-sucrose mixtures) reduces hepatic insulin sensitivity by increasing diacylglycerol and activating epsilon. Habitual intake exceeding 50-100 g/day correlates with elevated intrahepatic and diminished insulin-mediated suppression of endogenous glucose production in healthy adults. Meta-analyses indicate a dose-response relationship between consumption and (MetS), with higher intakes elevating risk through components like central , , and . For instance, sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake shows a clear link to MetS development, independent of total , with prospective cohorts demonstrating 20-30% increased odds per daily serving. from U.S. adults reveal MetS prevalence rising from 24.8% baseline to higher quintiles of added sugars (average 14.4% ), underscoring caloric-independent effects via fructose-driven hepatic . Umbrella reviews confirm that dietary patterns high in added sugars (e.g., >10-15% ) associate with greater MetS incidence, though strengthens with SSB-specific exposures due to calories evading signals. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk escalates nonlinearly with intake, particularly from SSBs, where meta-analyses report a 26-30% higher for highest versus lowest consumers, adjusting for adiposity and lifestyle. Each additional daily SSB serving links to 18-19% elevated T2D incidence, mediated partly by but also via direct beta-cell dysfunction and ectopic fat deposition from chronic . Global burden estimates attribute substantial T2D disability-adjusted life years to SSB consumption, with risks amplifying above 5-10% energy from free sugars, as per systematic evidence portfolios. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes exhibit dose-dependent associations with added sugars, where intakes exceeding 10% of total correlate with 9-38% higher CVD mortality, driven by , atherogenic , and . Prospective analyses show total sugar and intakes raising all-cause and CVD death risks, with nonlinear patterns indicating harm thresholds around 13% from added sugars. SSB consumption specifically contributes to rising global CVD burden, with 250 mL daily linking to 10% increased CVD events, compounded by metabolic intermediaries like elevated triglycerides and . Higher added sugar percentiles (>20% ) predict excess mortality, though evidence rates moderate for precise thresholds due to by overall diet quality.

Dental and Cognitive Outcomes

High intake of fermentable sugars, particularly , contributes to dental caries through a well-established mechanism involving oral bacteria such as , which ferment sugars into , lowering plaque below 5.5 and demineralizing over repeated exposures. is uniquely cariogenic among sugars because it serves as both an energy source for bacterial and a substrate for extracellular production, enhancing plaque adhesion and formation that sustains acid attacks. Frequency of consumption exacerbates risk more than total amount in some contexts, as prolonged acid exposure hinders remineralization, though availability and modulate outcomes. Epidemiological evidence from systematic reviews confirms a dose-dependent association: for instance, a 40 g/day increase in added sugars correlates with a 6.4% rise in caries lesions among children, while higher sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake elevates caries and erosion risk across . WHO-commissioned meta-analyses support recommended free sugar limits below 10% of energy intake to mitigate caries at the level, drawing from longitudinal and intervention showing reduced decay with sugar restriction. These findings hold despite confounders like socioeconomic factors, underscoring sugar's causal role via microbial rather than indirect pathways alone. Chronic high consumption of added sugars is associated with accelerated cognitive decline and elevated risk in observational studies, with cohort data linking higher intake to poorer , executive function including decision-making, and global cognition scores over time. A and of 17 studies found significant correlations between added sugars and risk, attributing potential harm to mechanisms like hippocampal and prefrontal neuroinflammation, reduced brain blood flow, insulin in the brain, and disrupted glucose homeostasis mimicking effects, with patterns of decline resembling early Alzheimer's. For example, adults with the highest sugar intake showed 1.5 times greater odds of compared to low consumers in a prospective study of over 1,200 participants followed for up to 6 years. However, evidence for direct causality remains limited by reliance on cross-sectional and cohort designs prone to reverse causation or unmeasured confounders such as overall diet quality and physical activity; acute glucose administration can transiently enhance cognition in healthy individuals, contrasting chronic excess effects that exhibit dose-dependence, with occasional moderate intake posing lower risks than daily high-sugar items like beverages leading to cumulative moderate harm. Some animal studies indicate partial reversibility of related brain derangements through dietary adjustments improving metabolic health, though human interventional evidence is scarce. Prenatal or long-term exposure appears particularly detrimental, with animal models and human prenatal data showing structural brain changes and functional deficits. Overall, while associations are robust, interventional evidence is needed to confirm thresholds beyond which risks intensify, independent of obesity or metabolic syndrome.

Long-Term Debates: Cancer, Addiction Claims

The hypothesis that dietary sugar directly promotes cancer development stems from observations of the Warburg effect, wherein cancer cells exhibit elevated glucose uptake and glycolysis for energy production, leading to claims that sugar "feeds" tumors. However, this metabolic shift occurs in all proliferating cells and does not imply causation by exogenous sugar intake; normal cells also rely heavily on glucose, and restricting sugar does not selectively starve cancer cells without harming healthy tissues. Epidemiological studies have not established direct causality, with meta-analyses of prospective cohorts showing null associations between total carbohydrate or sugar intake and overall cancer incidence. Observational data reveal modest associations between sugary beverage consumption and risks for specific cancers, such as and colorectal, potentially tied to or rather than sugar per se. For instance, a prospective analysis of over 100,000 French adults found that higher intake of sugar-sweetened beverages correlated with a 18% increased overall cancer risk and 22% for , though adjustments for confounders like adiposity attenuated effects. Critics note these links are indirect, primarily mediated by —excess caloric intake from sugars contributes to , which independently elevates cancer risk across 13 types via hormonal and inflammatory pathways—rather than sugar uniquely driving oncogenesis. Preclinical models suggest high-fructose diets may accelerate tumor growth through hepatic and promotion, but human translation remains speculative due to dosing differences and ethical limits on trials. Claims of sugar , often analogized to dependence via release in reward pathways, originate from intermittent-access paradigms where animals binge sugar, exhibit withdrawal signs like anxiety, and show cross-sensitization to drugs like amphetamines. These behaviors mimic criteria in animals, with sugar occasionally surpassing preference in self-administration tests under certain conditions. However, human evidence is scant and fails to meet clinical thresholds, such as tolerance, compulsive use despite harm, or neuroadaptations akin to opioids or stimulants; shows reward activation but no dependency syndrome in controlled studies. Scientific consensus views sugar as highly palatable and habit-forming—promoting overconsumption through sensory reward and glycemic spikes—but not addictive in the pharmacological sense, with claims exaggerated by media and lacking support from systematic reviews. A 2016 review concluded addiction-like responses in animals require restricted access mimicking human dieting cycles, not ad libitum intake, and human surveys report "food addiction" symptoms more attributable to ultra-processed foods' multifactorial palatability than isolated sugar. Behavioral interventions reducing added sugars yield no withdrawal comparable to substance use disorders, underscoring evolutionary adaptations for energy-dense foods rather than a discrete pathology.

Research and Policy Controversies

Industry Influence on Studies

In the mid-1960s, the Sugar Research Foundation (SRF), a representing the , paid three scientists approximately $6,500 in today's dollars—equivalent to about $50,000 adjusted for inflation—to conduct literature reviews on the dietary causes of coronary heart disease (CHD). These reviews, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1965 and 1967, selectively emphasized and as primary culprits while downplaying emerging evidence linking consumption to elevated triglycerides and CHD risk. Internal SRF documents reveal the organization initiated the project, drafted initial reports, and approved revisions to align with its interests, including suppressing data on sugar's potential harms from animal studies. This funding influenced key researchers like D. Mark Hegsted, who later advised U.S. Senate committees on nutrition policy, contributing to the paradigm shift toward low-fat dietary recommendations in the and that inadvertently promoted higher sugar intake through "heart-healthy" processed foods. The SRF's strategy mirrored tactics used by the , leveraging academic prestige to shape without full disclosure of financial ties at the time. Subsequent historical analyses of declassified documents, including correspondence between SRF executives and the Harvard team, confirm the industry's intent to counter studies like John Yudkin's 1972 book , which argued sugar's central role in metabolic diseases. Broader patterns of persist in sugar-related . A of 60 studies on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and cardiometabolic outcomes found that all 26 studies reporting no significant association were funded by the beverage industry, while independent studies were far more likely to identify risks such as and . Industry-sponsored overall shows a consistent favorable , with meta-analyses indicating sponsored trials report effect sizes up to eight times smaller for harms compared to independent ones. Mechanisms include selective outcome reporting, choice of surrogate endpoints over hard clinical outcomes, and funding of researchers with prior industry affiliations, often undisclosed until mandated by journals post-2000. Critics of these revelations, such as some researchers, argue that while funding occurred, it did not single-handedly "shift blame" to fat, citing confounding factors like concurrent epidemiological data favoring lipid hypotheses. However, from randomized controlled trials post-1980s, untainted by such sponsorship, has substantiated dose-dependent sugar risks for , underscoring how early industry influence delayed causal recognition. Disclosure requirements and calls for independent funding have since aimed to mitigate this, though industry lobbying continues to shape agendas, as seen in opposition to strict sugar limits in international guidelines.

Dietary Guidelines Evolution

The initial U.S. , released in 1980, advised to "avoid too much " without specifying quantities or distinguishing added from natural sugars, reflecting a broad caution amid rising concerns over dental caries and but prioritizing reductions in fat intake. This vagueness stemmed from limited epidemiological data at the time, with guidelines influenced by the 1977 Select on Nutrition's emphasis on increasing consumption to replace fats, a shift later criticized for overlooking potential metabolic harms of refined carbohydrates including sugars. By 2000, the guidelines urged moderation in sugars through food and beverage choices, still without numerical limits, as began linking sugar-sweetened beverages to but lacked consensus on total intake thresholds. A pivotal change occurred in the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines, which for the first time recommended limiting added sugars to less than 10% of daily caloric intake—approximately 50 grams or 12 teaspoons for a 2,000-calorie diet—based on associations between high intake and cardiometabolic risks in observational studies. This threshold aligned with evidence from systematic reviews indicating that exceeding 10% correlated with increased adiposity and markers, though causal mechanisms remained debated due to confounding factors like overall energy surplus. The 2020-2025 edition retained this limit while introducing stricter school meal standards starting in 2025, capping added sugars in certain foods like at 15 grams per serving, amid data showing average U.S. consumption at 17 teaspoons daily, far exceeding recommendations. Internationally, the World Health Organization first recommended in 1989 reducing free sugars—defined as monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods plus those in honey, syrups, and fruit juices—to below 10% of total energy intake, drawing from early cohort studies on caries and body weight. The 2015 WHO guideline strengthened this to a conditional further reduction to under 5% for additional benefits against non-communicable diseases, supported by meta-analyses of randomized trials showing dose-dependent effects on dental health but weaker direct causation for obesity independent of calories. Critics argue these quantitative limits lack robust evidence isolating added sugars' harms from total caloric excess or displacement, with some reviews finding no unique metabolic detriment beyond energy balance and noting potential overemphasis on forms while ignoring satiating sources. Historical guideline evolution has been faulted for entrenching a low-fat, high-carbohydrate post-1970s, coinciding with a 19% rise in per capita sugar availability from 1970 to 2005 and the , though causal attribution remains contested due to multi-factorial drivers like sedentary lifestyles. Government and WHO sources, while authoritative, have faced for selective interpretation favoring population-level interventions over individualized caloric control.

Regulatory Measures: Taxes and Subsidies

Various governments have imposed excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) to curb consumption linked to and related health issues, with over 130 jurisdictions in nearly 120 countries implementing such measures as of 2025. pioneered a national SSB tax of 10% per liter in January 2014, resulting in a 33.1% retail price increase for taxed beverages and a sustained decline in purchases, particularly among lower-income households. In the , a two-tier introduced in April 2018—8 pence per liter for drinks with 5-8 grams of sugar per 100 ml and 24 pence for higher levels—correlated with a reduction in household sugar purchases from SSBs by about 10% in the first year, with peer-reviewed analyses confirming decreased caloric intake from taxed items. In the United States, city-level SSB taxes have shown consistent effects on reducing volumes sold; for instance, Berkeley, California's 1-cent-per-ounce tax effective March 2015 led to a 21% drop in SSB consumption four months post-implementation, while Philadelphia's 1.5-cent-per-ounce levy from January 2017 and Seattle's 1.75-cent-per-ounce tax from January 2018 each prompted substantial purchase declines of 30-38% in the initial years, with minimal substitution to untaxed sugary drinks. Systematic reviews of real-world evaluations indicate these taxes generally increase SSB prices by 20-50% of the and reduce purchases by 10-30%, though long-term health outcomes like remain modest due to partial offsetting via untaxed alternatives or cross-border . Critics, including industry analyses, argue such taxes disproportionately burden low-income groups without proportionally improving metrics, as evidenced by limited BMI reductions in some cohorts. Conversely, agricultural subsidies prop up sugar production in major exporting and importing nations, often elevating domestic prices above global averages and distorting . In the United States, the federal sugar program, reauthorized through the 2018 Farm Bill and extended in 2024, offers nonrecourse s to processors at minimum rates of 18 cents per pound for raw cane sugar and 22.9 cents for refined beet sugar, allowing forfeiture of collateral sugar to the if market prices fall below levels, which effectively guarantees producer revenues at taxpayer expense—estimated at $3-4 billion annually in higher consumer costs and occasional buyouts for . This system has resulted in domestic prices averaging 2-3 times world levels since the , incentivizing inefficient production while inviting WTO challenges. The historically subsidized production and exports under its , exporting 4-5 million tons annually with refunds until reforms in 2006 reduced quotas by 36% and phased out direct export subsidies following WTO rulings against practices like those in Council Regulation (EC) No. 1260/2001, which contested as violating agriculture agreement limits. Post-reform, EU support shifted to decoupled payments, yet production persists with indirect aids, contributing to market surpluses. In , the world's top sugar exporter controlling 38% of global , government programs including credit guarantees, blending mandates, and agronomy financing provide at least $2.5 billion yearly in support, enabling low-cost expansion despite volatile prices and fueling accusations of dumping that undercut competitors. These subsidies collectively foster —global sugar output exceeded 180 million tons in 2023—while raising import barriers in protected markets, though empirical data reveals they exacerbate price volatility rather than stabilizing farmer incomes long-term.

Societal and Environmental Context

Cultural and Symbolic Roles

In antiquity and the medieval period, sugar functioned primarily as a rare luxury , symbolizing wealth and status due to its importation from distant regions like and the , where it was initially valued for medicinal purposes and offerings rather than everyday consumption. By the 13th century in , monarchs such as those in consumed it sparingly as a spice-like , reinforcing its association with power and exclusivity amid high costs from Venetian trade monopolies. During the , sugar's symbolic role extended to edible art forms known as "subtleties," elaborate molded from boiled sugar paste into architectural or mythological figures, such as mythical trees or heraldic emblems, displayed at banquets to dazzle guests and demonstrate the host's affluence and ingenuity. These transient works, often gilded and scented, blurred the lines between and , embodying impermanence and sensory indulgence while underscoring sugar's transformation from spice to status-driven spectacle by the . In religious contexts, sugar evokes themes of devotion and purity; in Hindu Puranic traditions, it appears in offerings to deities like Vireshvara, where its sweetness metaphorically represents spiritual devotion and auspiciousness. Similarly, in Buddhist monastic practices, sugar serves as a portable provision for traveling monks, symbolizing sustenance amid precepts urging moderation to avoid attachment. Across ancient civilizations, sweets derived from sugar or analogs featured in ceremonial offerings to gods, linking sweetness to divine favor and communal rituals predating widespread refinement techniques. Culturally, sugar's symbolism persists in associations with celebration and , where its distribution in confections reinforces social bonds and identity, though historical scarcity shaped its role more as a marker of than universal pleasure. In folklore from certain European households, sugar's perceived spiritual properties—such as attracting prosperity when left exposed—further embedded it in beliefs about and domestic rituals, reflecting its evolution from exotic import to embedded .

Economic and Labor Impacts

The global sugar industry generates substantial economic value, with production reaching approximately 189 million metric tons in the 2024/2025 season, primarily from sugarcane and sugar beets. Revenue for sugar manufacturing is projected at $83.2 billion in 2024, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 5.6% over the prior five years despite annual fluctuations. Brazil dominates production at 43.7 to 46.88 million metric tons annually, followed by India at 28 million tons and the European Union at 16.5 million tons, accounting for over 40% of worldwide output. Sugar trade is heavily distorted by subsidies and tariffs, which elevate domestic prices in protected markets like the and while disadvantaging exporters in developing countries. In the U.S., the sugar program imposes costs of $2.4 to $4 billion annually on consumers through high prices and contributes to 17,000 to 20,000 job losses in sugar-using industries, as imported sugar quotas and tariffs limit cheaper foreign supply. Export subsidies in the EU enable surplus disposal but depress global prices, undermining competitiveness for unsubsidized producers in and . These policies perpetuate inefficiencies, with developing nations facing barriers to despite their reliance on sugar exports for and rural .
Top Sugar Producers (2024/2025, million metric tons)Production
43.7-46.88
28
16.5
Historically, sugar production fueled labor exploitation on a massive scale, with plantations in the relying on enslaved African labor from the 16th to 19th centuries, driving the transatlantic slave trade and entrenching systems of coerced work tied to the crop's labor-intensive harvesting. This model persisted post-abolition through and , embedding exploitative practices in the industry's structure. In modern contexts, sugar cultivation and processing continue to involve severe labor abuses, particularly in developing regions where manual harvesting predominates. Child labor affects thousands in sugarcane fields, as documented in where trafficked minors face , physical abuse, and withheld wages, often supplied by intermediaries to mills during harvest seasons. Similar patterns occur in , with forced labor and child exploitation linked to for sugarcane expansion, including non-payment and punitive measures against workers. The U.S. Department of Labor identifies sugar from countries like , , and others as produced with child or forced labor, characterized by hazardous conditions, long hours, and exposure to pesticides without protective gear. These issues stem from the crop's seasonal, physically demanding nature, low wages, and weak enforcement in rural areas, sustaining cycles of and vulnerability despite international conventions.

Sustainability Challenges

Sugar production, predominantly from which accounts for about 80% of global output, poses significant challenges due to its intensive resource demands and environmental externalities. cultivation requires substantial inputs, with estimates indicating 1,500 to 2,000 liters of per kilogram of sugar produced, exacerbating in drought-prone regions like parts of and . This high footprint stems from needs in rain-fed systems and evaporative losses, contributing to depletion and competition with other agricultural and domestic uses. Land use pressures from sugarcane expansion have led to habitat conversion and , particularly through practices that degrade and reduce ecosystem diversity. In , the world's largest producer, sugarcane fields have historically encroached on native biomes such as the , with expansion since the 2000s converting millions of hectares of and degraded land, though direct of primary remains limited to under 1% of total area. Pre-harvest burning of fields, still practiced in some regions despite bans, releases pollutants and further harms air quality and . Greenhouse gas emissions from sugar production arise primarily from farming activities, including from fertilizers and energy use in cultivation, accounting for roughly 68% of the total footprint in certified operations. Lifecycle assessments vary by region; for instance, Chinese sugar production emitted 0.91 tons of CO2 equivalent per ton in 2021, while Brazilian systems benefit from that can offset emissions, though transportation and indirect land-use changes add to the net impact. Intensive pesticide and fertilizer application amplifies pollution risks, with sugarcane farming consuming 10-15% of imported pesticides in countries like Malawi and leading to residues in soil and waterways. In Thailand, historical organochlorine pesticide use persists in the production chain, contributing to long-term contamination. Runoff from these inputs causes eutrophication and harms aquatic life, underscoring the need for precision agriculture to mitigate non-point source pollution. Overall, these challenges are compounded by climate variability, which threatens yields through droughts and pests, while global demand drives further intensification without proportional adoption of sustainable practices like reduced or . Efforts to certify sustainable , such as Bonsucro standards, aim to address these issues but cover only a of production, leaving systemic vulnerabilities in , , and emissions management.

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Sucrose
  2. https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/f17jfr/sugar_beet_vs_sugar_cane_regional_outputs/
  3. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/sugar.pdf
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10074550/
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26376619/
  6. https://www.etymonline.com/word/sugar
  7. https://medium.com/language-travels/what-is-the-origin-of-the-word-sugar-880615c8f0f5
  8. https://yvanspijk.tumblr.com/post/701557436461563904/the-word-sugar-comes-from-sanskrit-%25C5%259Barkar%25C4%2581-and
  9. https://www.exploratorium.edu/explore/cooking/sugar
  10. https://www.ift.org/career-development/learn-about-food-science/food-facts/food-facts-food-ingredients-and-additives/sugars-a-scientific-overview
  11. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Biological_Chemistry/Chemistry_of_Cooking_%28Rodriguez-Velazquez%29/04%253A_Sugar/4.01%253A_Sugar_Chemistry_%28ADD_US%29
  12. https://www.sugar.org/sugar/sugars/
  13. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22425-4
  14. https://phys.org/news/2021-04-ancient-pottery-reveals-evidence-honey.html
  15. https://evolution.earthathome.org/grasses/andropogoneae/sugarcane-history/
  16. https://www.sugar.org/blog/a-brief-history-of-real-sugar-the-story-of-sugar-cane/
  17. https://www.cirad.fr/en/press-area/press-releases/2025/origin-of-sugarcane-revealed
  18. https://www.sugar.org/sugar/history/
  19. https://aista.co.in/about-sugar/history-of-sugar/
  20. https://samaytrade.com/blog/the-sweet-story-of-indian-sugar-from-ancient-times-to-modern-day-industry
  21. https://indianexpress.com/article/research/sugar-is-sweet-but-its-history-says-otherwise-8667373/
  22. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/disappearing-pod/sugar-the-most-evil-molecule/
  23. https://www.artofliving.org/in-en/culture/amazing-facts/how-sugar-travelled-around-the-world
  24. https://www.alimentarium.org/en/fact-sheet/history-sugar
  25. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/sugar/
  26. https://www.suedzuckergroup.com/en/company/history/history-of-sugar
  27. https://anetoday.org/jones-medieval-sugar-production/
  28. https://www.kandy.pl/history-of-candied-fruits
  29. https://dom.com.cy/en/live/blog/sweet-island/
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/214019
  31. https://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/201204/sugar.please.htm
  32. https://dcc.newberry.org/?p=16944
  33. https://www.pbs.org/food/stories/history-beets
  34. https://todayinsci.com/A/Achard_Franz/AchardFranz-BeetSugarInEurope%281917%29.htm
  35. http://www.stgitehistory.org.uk/sugarrefining.html
  36. https://64parishes.org/entry/norbert-rillieux
  37. https://news.hylman.com/news-detail/sugar/sugarcane-to-bioenergy-a-sweet-revolution-hylmans-refined-roadmap-to-thrive-in-the-sugar-industry-through-environmental-stewardship-technological-breakthroughs-and-consumer-centric-solutions
  38. https://vespertool.com/knowledge-hub/sugar/types-of-data/production-data/
  39. https://www.czapp.com/analyst-insights/sugar-statshot-global-sugar-production-in-2024-25-will-be-the-highest-on-record/
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154324005568
  41. https://new.abb.com/control-systems/industry-specific-solutions/food-beverage/segments/sugar
  42. https://www.indiansugar.com/PDFS/Technologies_used_in_sugar_Industry__1_.pdf
  43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK579981/
  44. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/General_Biology_1e_%28OpenStax%29/1%253A_The_Chemistry_of_Life/3%253A_Biological_Macromolecules/3.2%253A_Carbohydrates
  45. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-biology/chemistry-of-life/properties-structure-and-function-of-biological-macromolecules/a/carbohydrates
  46. https://ific.org/insights/background_on_carbohydrates_sugars/
  47. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/sucrose-glucose-fructose
  48. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Sacramento_City_College/SCC%253A_Chem_309_-_General_Organic_and_Biochemistry_%28Bennett%29/Text/14%253A_Carbohydrates/14.6%253A_Disaccharides
  49. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Biological_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Biological_Chemistry%29/Carbohydrates/Disaccharides/Sucrose
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/disaccharide
  51. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%253A_Introductory_Chemistry_%28CK-12%29/26%253A_Biochemistry/26.02%253A_Disaccharides
  52. https://byjus.com/chemistry/disaccharides/
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/sucrose
  54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK579972/
  55. https://fodzyme.com/resources/difference-between-oligosaccharides-polysaccharides
  56. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/University_of_Connecticut/Chem_2444%253A_%28Second_Semester_Organic_Chemistry%29_UConn/12%253A_Carbohydrates_and_Sugars/12.01%253A_Classification_of_Carbohydrates
  57. https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/multimedia/video/overview-of-carbohydrates-and-sugars
  58. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chemistry/sucrose/
  59. https://byjus.com/chemistry/sucrose/
  60. https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB4337508.htm
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/sugar-crops
  62. https://evolution.earthathome.org/grasses/andropogoneae/sugarcane-quick-facts/
  63. https://www.sugar.org/blog/refining-and-processing-sugar-cane/
  64. https://www.suedzucker.com/sustainability/sugar-beet/
  65. https://www.sugar.org/blog/a-brief-history-of-real-sugar-the-story-of-sugar-beets/
  66. https://sugar.ca/sugar-basics/sources-of-sugar
  67. https://riskmap.fairtrade.net/commodities/sugar
  68. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/SC112
  69. https://www.ars.usda.gov/oc/utm/the-role-of-precision-agriculture-in-sugarcane-production/
  70. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-A-PURL-gpo25892/pdf/GOVPUB-A-PURL-gpo25892.pdf
  71. http://chartsbin.com/view/44263
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Sugarcane-productivity-t-ha-in-different-countries-2018_fig4_353774930
  73. https://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Crops/Sugarbeet.aspx
  74. https://extension.umn.edu/source-magazine/staying-top-sugarbeets
  75. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/extensionhist/article/2706/viewcontent/ec01_156.pdf
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325007148
  77. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Montana-Economics-Reduced-Tillage-Sugar-Beets.pdf
  78. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/c9s10-1a.pdf
  79. https://www.sugar.org/sugar/refining-processing/
  80. https://www.sugarnutritionresource.org/news-articles/refining-sugar-cane
  81. https://www.purolite.com/index/core-technologies/industry/food-and-beverage/sugar-refining-applications/cane-sugar-production/cane-sugar-refining-process
  82. https://www.britannica.com/science/sugar-chemical-compound/Cane-sugar
  83. https://www.sugar.org/blog/refining-and-processing-sugar-beets/
  84. https://project.geo.msu.edu/geogmich/beetindustry.html
  85. https://www.crystalsugar.com/about-our-cooperative/how-we-make-sugar/
  86. https://hnoc.org/publishing/first-draft/free-man-color-whose-invention-revolutionized-sugar-industry
  87. https://www.britishsugar.co.uk/about-sugar/how-sugar-is-made
  88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/sugar-crystals
  89. https://www.kingarthurbaking.com/blog/2023/03/21/a-guide-to-different-types-of-sugars-how-to-use-them-and-when-to-substitute
  90. https://www.thekitchn.com/a-complete-visual-guide-to-sugar-ingredient-intelligence-213715
  91. https://whatscookingamerica.net/sugar.htm
  92. https://www.sugar.org/sugar/types/
  93. https://www.ragus.co.uk/what-are-the-differences-between-different-crystalline-sugars-ragus/
  94. https://www.thoughtco.com/sugar-crystals-and-rock-candy-pictures-4123170
  95. https://www.ragus.co.uk/what-is-crystalline-sugar/
  96. https://www.wekivaculinary.org/working-with-sugar-the-magic-of-crystallization/
  97. https://www.publish.csiro.au/ch/pdf/ch9671115
  98. https://www.sugar.org/sugar/uses/
  99. https://wsro.org/sugars-diet/role-sugars-play-foods
  100. https://www.sugarnutritionresource.org/the-basics/functions-of-sugars-in-food
  101. https://www.baking-sense.com/2017/03/29/baking-ingredient-sugar/
  102. https://bakerpedia.com/the-function-of-sugar-in-baking/
  103. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/UW-Whitewater/UWX_CH114%253A_Chemistry_in_the_Kitchen/05%253A_Macronutrients_-_Carbohydrates/5.05%253A_Sugars_and_Cooking
  104. https://www.sugarnutritionresource.org/news-articles/sugar-as-a-preservative
  105. https://www.lactic.com/news/sugar-preservative-food-benefits-challenges-and-alternatives
  106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3863796/
  107. https://www.instructables.com/10-unusual-uses-for-sugar/
  108. https://www.today.com/home/household-uses-sugar-i554737
  109. https://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=121488
  110. https://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/speeding-up-sugars-conversion-into-fuel
  111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065231807610051
  112. https://mbsugars.com/what-is-sucrose/
  113. https://books.rsc.org/books/chapter-pdf/1199466/bk9781847559050-00264.pdf
  114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128029800000134
  115. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bk-2010-1061.ch001
  116. http://www.chemwinfo.com/private_folder/Uploadfiles2015_May/EC_SugarPlaforms_to_Biofuels_and_Bi.pdf
  117. https://www.wilmarsugar-anz.com/media-centre/latest-news/sugar-for-non-food-uses
  118. https://www.sugars.com/sugar-for-fermentation-and-non-food
  119. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/0612000
  120. https://www.worldstopexports.com/sugar-exports-country/
  121. https://www.tridge.com/intelligences/sugar/import
  122. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2023-2032_08801ab7-en/full-report/sugar_f99ea815.html
  123. https://www.who.int/news/item/04-03-2015-who-calls-on-countries-to-reduce-sugars-intake-among-adults-and-children
  124. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/librariesprovider2/euro-health-topics/obesity/sugars-factsheet.pdf
  125. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/sugar-consumption-by-country
  126. https://www.worldatlas.com/industries/countries-that-consume-the-most-sugar.html
  127. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/07/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2025-2034_3eb15914/full-report/sugar_a824c3c3.html
  128. https://openknowledge.fao.org/3/cd0991en/sugar.pdf
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10346066/
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3257707/
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10954417/
  132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4785287/
  133. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400530/pdf/DBrief/24_Sources_of_Added_Sugars_in_Adults%27_Diet_2015-2016.pdf
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125030288
  135. https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/carbohydrates/added-sugar-in-the-diet/
  136. https://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/php/data-research/added-sugars.html
  137. https://www.ice.com/products/914/Sugar-No-16-Futures
  138. https://www.expanamarkets.com/insights/article/sugar-prices-2025-market-trends-and-outlook/
  139. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sugar-prices-climb-signs-stronger-162602113.html
  140. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/sugar
  141. https://www.teqsgroup.com/post/the-economics-of-sugar-understanding-the-key-factors-driving-sugar-prices
  142. https://www.ragus.co.uk/how-the-global-sugar-market-works/
  143. https://ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/sugar-and-sweeteners/market-outlook
  144. https://thedeepcore.com/understanding-the-factors-driving-global-sugar-prices/
  145. https://hermestech.io/en/blog/post/sugar-global-commodity-complex-dynamics
  146. https://bandmsugar.com/blog/sugar-market-outlook-2025/
  147. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sugar-prices-fall-lowest-levels-170253653.html
  148. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathway/PathBank:SMP0000058
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/sucrose-metabolism
  150. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026156142030697X
  151. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560599/
  152. https://www.kegg.jp/pathway/map00010
  153. https://www.amboss.com/us/knowledge/glycolysis-and-gluconeogenesis/
  154. https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/biomolecules/carbohydrate-metabolism/v/regulation-of-glycolysis-and-gluconeogenesis
  155. https://www.jci.org/articles/view/96702
  156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/fructose-metabolism
  157. https://nutrition.org/sugars-created-equal-lets-talk-fructose-metabolism/
  158. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.783393/full
  159. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/are-certain-types-of-sugars-healthier-than-others-2019052916699
  160. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9551185/
  161. https://www.eatthismuch.com/calories/sugar-4644
  162. https://www.nutritionix.com/food/sugar/100-g
  163. https://sugar.ca/sugar-basics/frequently-asked-questions-about-sugar/nutritional-value
  164. https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-smart/sugar/added-sugars
  165. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3738222/
  166. https://www.cargill.com/food-beverage/emea/sweeteners/sweetness-explained
  167. https://owlsoft.com/pdf_docs/WhitePaper/Rel_Sweet.pdf
  168. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996922011346
  169. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/16/2512
  170. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8899294/
  171. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-019-0407-z
  172. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316622025913
  173. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9584980/
  174. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7305087/
  175. https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article/79/2/171/5862612
  176. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41387-022-00191-6
  177. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-024-00332-4
  178. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711109/
  179. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/jaha.114.001700
  180. https://www.uab.edu/news/news-you-can-use/how-much-sugar-is-too-much-uab-neuroscientists-weigh-in
  181. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7774304/
  182. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/36/1/150/38265/Moderate-Amounts-of-Fructose-Consumption-Impair
  183. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/6/774
  184. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2963518/
  185. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20693348/
  186. https://www.ajpmfocus.org/article/S2773-0654%2825%2900147-6/fulltext
  187. https://www.bmj.com/content/381/bmj-2022-071609
  188. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4420570/
  189. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03345-4
  190. https://odphp.health.gov/our-work/nutrition-physical-activity/dietary-guidelines/previous-dietary-guidelines/2015/advisory-report/appendix-e-2/appendix-e-245
  191. https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196%2819%2930911-5/fulltext
  192. https://nutritionj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12937-024-00926-4
  193. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.035978
  194. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165%2822%2903109-4/fulltext
  195. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8259/
  196. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-59733-6
  197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916522034086
  198. https://www.carequest.org/system/files/CareQuest_Institute_Links-Between-Sugar-and-Dental-Decay_FINAL.pdf
  199. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32830237/
  200. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4717883/
  201. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-021-3775-4
  202. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10780393/
  203. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4371171/
  204. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38201905/
  205. https://hms.harvard.edu/news-events/publications-archive/brain/sugar-brain
  206. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10921393/
  207. https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/eating-lots-of-carbs-sugar-may-raise-risk-of-cognitive-impairment-mayo-clinic-study-finds/
  208. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2274580724003479
  209. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.939820/full
  210. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35111373/
  211. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-024-03525-6
  212. https://www.mskcc.org/news/no-sugar-no-cancer-look-evidence
  213. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165%2822%2900884-X/fulltext
  214. https://www.bmj.com/content/366/bmj.l2408
  215. https://www.mdanderson.org/cancerwise/does-sugar-cause-cancer-.h00-159775656.html
  216. https://www.aicr.org/news/the-sugar-cancer-connection/
  217. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9775518/
  218. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2235907/
  219. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23719144/
  220. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5174153/
  221. https://consensus.app/papers/sugar-addiction-the-state-of-the-science-westwater-fletcher/30df6a5b97715d0dbc8d04398e10e72b/
  222. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jun/05/is-sugar-addictive-substance-abuse
  223. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-018-0203-9
  224. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2548255
  225. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/well/eat/how-the-sugar-industry-shifted-blame-to-fat.html
  226. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5099084/
  227. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/13/493739074/50-years-ago-sugar-industry-quietly-paid-scientists-to-point-blame-at-fat
  228. https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2016/09/404081/sugar-papers-reveal-industry-role-shifting-national-heart-disease-focus
  229. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/L16-0534
  230. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6063770/
  231. https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20161031/industry-sponsorship-more-often-associated-with-positive-results-in-nutrition-studies
  232. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578
  233. https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/researchers-challenge-claims-sugar-industry-shifted-blame-fat
  234. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14758862/
  235. https://www.northwell.edu/news/the-latest/us-dietary-recommendations-changes-last-50-years
  236. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/about-dietary-guidelines/history-dietary-guidelines
  237. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165%2822%2903401-3/fulltext
  238. https://www.sugar.org/diet/policy/dietary-guidelines/
  239. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Dietary_Guidelines_for_Americans_2020-2025.pdf
  240. https://www.fns.usda.gov/cn/school-nutrition-standards-updates/added-sugars
  241. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549028
  242. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK285538/
  243. https://nutritionj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12937-015-0114-0
  244. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464488/
  245. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.109.192627
  246. https://www.obesityevidencehub.org.au/collections/prevention/countries-that-have-implemented-taxes-on-sugar-sweetened-beverages-ssbs
  247. https://publichealth.berkeley.edu/articles/spotlight/research/taxes-on-sugar-sweetened-drinks-drive-decline-in-consumption
  248. https://ldi.upenn.edu/our-work/research-updates/5-takeaways-from-the-evidence-on-sweetened-beverage-taxes/
  249. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2813506
  250. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9285619/
  251. https://www.colorado.edu/asmagazine/2022/12/06/economist-finds-sweet-success-soda-taxes
  252. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/candy-coated-cartel-time-kill-us-sugar-program
  253. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/sugar-and-sweeteners/policy
  254. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds265_e.htm
  255. https://sugaralliance.org/foreign-sugar
  256. https://www.farmprogress.com/corn/brazil-sugar-industry-receives-massive-government-subsidies-115372
  257. https://www.britishmuseum.org/blog/story-sugar-5-objects
  258. https://www.sugar-sphere.com/blogs/news/the-sweet-influence-how-sugar-shaped-history-pop-culture
  259. https://cdn.vanderbilt.edu/vu-my/wp-content/uploads/sites/1414/2014/04/14122105/Session_04_Mintz.pdf
  260. https://www.goldcoastlogin.com.au/sugar-through-the-ages
  261. https://artuk.org/discover/stories/sweets-slavery-and-sculptures-a-brief-history-of-sugar-in-art
  262. https://kingsearlymodern.co.uk/keythings/subtlety
  263. https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/11/20/456627679/let-them-eat-sugar-sculpture-the-getty-celebrates-edible-table-art
  264. https://blogs.getty.edu/iris/this-just-in-a-sugar-sculpture-in-technicolor/
  265. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/sugar-offerings
  266. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/sugar
  267. https://candiesandsweets.com/the-story-of-candy-in-religious-ceremonies/
  268. https://lifestyle.sustainability-directory.com/question/what-role-does-culture-play-in-sugar-consumption/
  269. https://www.facebook.com/groups/544175310009545/posts/1440905457003188/
  270. https://www.ibisworld.com/global/industry/global-sugar-manufacturing/363/
  271. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/46014/12047_err59_1_.pdf?v=42642
  272. https://publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu/academics/research/policy-review/2009v2/sugar-price-support-programs.htm
  273. https://yeutter-institute.unl.edu/research/faculty-research/recapping-effects-us-sugar-program/
  274. https://www.fao.org/4/y4852e/y4852e11.htm
  275. https://www.fao.org/4/x0513e/x0513e06.htm
  276. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/05/21/sugar-capitalism-slave-trade-labor-exploitation/
  277. https://globalizationandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12992-023-00963-4
  278. https://www.freedomunited.org/news/child-trafficking-indian-sugar/
  279. https://www.coca-colacompany.com/content/dam/company/us/en/policies/pdf/human-workplace-rights/addressing-global-issues/forced-labor-child-labor-and-land-use-paraguay.pdf
  280. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/reports/child-labor/list-of-goods-print
  281. https://www.ilo.org/media/303576/download
  282. https://www.cnvinternationaal.nl/en/topical/news/sugarindustry-kidney-labour-conditions
  283. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/blog/eating-less-sugar-would-be-great-for-the-planet-as-well-as-our-health
  284. https://pide.org.pk/research/water-use-efficiency-comparing-water-use-efficiency-in-sugarcane-and-cotton-production/
  285. https://www.qmul.ac.uk/geog/media/geography/docs/teachers/Global-average-water-footprint-teachers.docx
  286. https://www.sugarcane.org/blog/sustainability-of-sugarcane-production/
  287. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0570178320300439
  288. https://news.mongabay.com/2019/11/sugarcane-threatens-amazon-forest-and-world-climate-brazilian-ethanol-is-not-clean-commentary/
  289. https://unica.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Brazilian-Sugarcane.pdf
  290. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969724071201
  291. https://bonsucro.com/ghg-emissions-in-sugarcane/
  292. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S235255092400071X
  293. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c08488
  294. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121941830036X
  295. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915752300594X
  296. https://healtheplanet.com/100-ways-to-heal-the-planet/sugar-production-and-consumption
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.