Hubbry Logo
FascismFascismMain
Open search
Fascism
Community hub
Fascism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fascism
Fascism
from Wikipedia

Benito Mussolini, dictator of Italy (left), and Adolf Hitler, dictator of Germany (right), were fascist leaders.

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement that rose to prominence in early-20th-century Europe.[1][2][3] Fascism is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.[3][4] Opposed to communism, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and socialism,[5][6] fascism is at the far right of the traditional left–right spectrum.[1][6][7]

The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I before spreading to other European countries, most notably Germany.[1] Fascism also had adherents outside of Europe.[8] Fascists saw World War I as a revolution that brought massive changes to the nature of war, society, the state, and technology. The advent of total war and the mass mobilization of society erased the distinction between civilians and combatants. A military citizenship arose, in which all citizens were involved with the military in some manner.[9] The war resulted in the rise of a powerful state capable of mobilizing millions of people to serve on the front lines, providing logistics to support them, and having unprecedented authority to intervene in the lives of citizens.[9]

Fascism views forms of violence – including political violence, imperialist violence, and war – as means to national rejuvenation.[10][11] Fascists often advocate for the establishment of a totalitarian one-party state,[12][13] and for a dirigiste economy, which is a market economy in which the state plays a strong directive role through market intervention with the principal goal of achieving national economic self-sufficiency, or "autarky."[14][15] Fascism emphasizes both palingenesis – national rebirth or regeneration – and modernity when it is deemed compatible with national rebirth.[16] In promoting the nation's regeneration, fascists seek to purge it of decadence.[16] Fascism may also centre around an ingroup-outgroup opposition and demonization of "Others" such as various ethnicities, immigrants, nations, races, political opponents of fascist parties, religious groups, and sexual and gender minorities. In the case of Nazism, this involved racial purity and a belief in a master race. Such demonization has motivated fascist regimes to commit massacres, forced sterilizations, deportations, and genocides.[17][18] During World War II, the genocidal and imperialist ambitions of the fascist Axis powers resulted in the murder of millions of people.

Since the end of World War II in 1945, fascism has been largely disgraced, and few parties have openly described themselves as fascist; the term is often used pejoratively by political opponents. The descriptions neo-fascist or post-fascist are sometimes applied to contemporary parties with ideologies similar to, or rooted in, 20th-century fascist movements.[1][19]

Etymology

[edit]
The fasces, a symbol of Ancient Rome, was employed in the modern era by various political movements to denote strength through unity.[20]

The Italian term fascismo is derived from fascio, meaning 'bundle of sticks', ultimately from the Latin word fasces.[4] This was the name given to political organizations in Italy known as fasci, groups similar to guilds or syndicates. According to Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini's own account, the Fasces of Revolutionary Action were founded in Italy in 1915.[21] In 1919, Mussolini founded the Italian Fasces of Combat in Milan, which became the National Fascist Party two years later. The fascists came to associate the term with the ancient Roman fasces or fascio littorio,[22] a bundle of rods tied around an axe,[23] an ancient Roman symbol of the authority of the civic magistrate,[24] carried by his lictors.[25] The symbolism of the fasces suggested strength through unity: a single rod is easily broken, while the bundle is difficult to break.[26]

Prior to 1914, the fasces symbol was widely employed by various political movements, often of a left-wing or liberal persuasion. For instance, according to Robert Paxton, "Marianne, symbol of the French Republic, was often portrayed in the nineteenth century carrying the fasces to represent the force of Republican solidarity against her aristocratic and clerical enemies."[20] The symbol often appeared as an architectural motif, for instance on the Sheldonian Theater at Oxford University and on the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C.[20]

Definitions

[edit]

Historian Ian Kershaw once wrote, "Trying to define 'fascism' is like trying to nail jelly to the wall."[27] Each group described as "fascist" has at least some unique elements, and frequently definitions of "fascism" have been criticized as either too broad or too narrow.[28][page needed] According to many scholars, fascists—especially when they are in power—have historically attacked communism, socialism, conservatism, and parliamentary liberalism, attracting support primarily from the far-right.[29]

Historian Stanley G. Payne's definition is frequently cited as standard by such scholars as Roger Griffin,[30] Bo Rothstein,[31] Aristotle Kallis,[32] and Stephen D. Shenfield.[33] His definition of fascism focuses on three concepts:[34]

  1. "Fascist negations" – anti-liberalism, anti-communism, and anti-conservatism.
  2. "Fascist goals" – the creation of a nationalist dictatorship to regulate economic structure and to transform social relations within a modern, self-determined culture, and the expansion of the nation into an empire.
  3. "Fascist style" – a political aesthetic of romantic symbolism, mass mobilization, a positive view of violence, and promotion of masculinity, youth, and charismatic authoritarian leadership.[35]

Payne's understanding was developed by Griffin and Roger Eatwell, who defined their theories as the "new consensus" in fascist studies. Roger Griffin follows the description of Payne and adds an emphasis[36] on the "mythic core" of fascism which is a palingenetic form of populist ultranationalism."[37] Without palingenetic ultranationalism, there is no "genuine fascism" according to Griffin.[38] Griffin further describes fascism as having three core components: "(i) the rebirth myth, (ii) populist ultra-nationalism, and (iii) the myth of decadence."[39] In Griffin's view, fascism is "a genuinely revolutionary, trans-class form of anti-liberal, and in the last analysis, anti-conservative nationalism" built on a complex range of theoretical and cultural influences. He distinguishes an inter-war period in which it manifested itself in elite-led but populist "armed party" politics opposing socialism and liberalism, and promising radical politics to rescue the nation from decadence.[40]

Eatwell defines fascism as "an ideology that strives to forge social rebirth based on a holistic-national radical Third Way",[41] while Walter Laqueur sees the core tenets of fascism as "self-evident: nationalism; social Darwinism; racialism, the need for leadership, a new aristocracy, and obedience; and the negation of the ideals of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution."[42]

Kershaw argues that the difference between fascism and other forms of right-wing authoritarianism in the interwar period is that the latter generally aimed "to conserve the existing social order", whereas fascism was "revolutionary", seeking to change society and obtain "total commitment" from the population.[43] In Against the Fascist Creep, Alexander Reid Ross writes regarding Griffin's view: "Following the Cold War and shifts in fascist organizing techniques, a number of scholars have moved toward the minimalist 'new consensus' refined by Roger Griffin: 'the mythic core' of fascism is 'a populist form of palingenetic ultranationalism.' That means that fascism is an ideology that draws on old, ancient, and even arcane myths of racial, cultural, ethnic, and national origins to develop a plan for the 'new man.'"[44] Griffin himself explored this 'mythic' or 'eliminable' core of fascism with his concept of post-fascism to explore the continuation of Nazism in the modern era.[45] Additionally, other historians have applied this minimalist core to explore proto-fascist movements.[46][47]

In his book How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them (2018), Jason Stanley defined fascism thusly:

[A] cult of the leader who promises national restoration in the face of humiliation brought on by supposed communists, Marxists and minorities and immigrants who are supposedly posing a threat to the character and the history of a nation ... The leader proposes that only he can solve it and all of his political opponents are enemies or traitors.

Stanley says recent global events as of 2020, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020–2023 United States racial unrest, have substantiated his concern about how fascist rhetoric is showing up in politics and policies around the world.[48]

Cas Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser argue that although fascism "flirted with populism ... in an attempt to generate mass support", it is better seen as an elitist ideology.[49] They cite in particular its exaltation of the Leader, the race, and the state, rather than the people. They see populism as a "thin-centered ideology" with a "restricted morphology" that necessarily becomes attached to "thick-centered" ideologies such as fascism, liberalism, or socialism. Thus populism can be found as an aspect of many specific ideologies, without necessarily being a defining characteristic of those ideologies. They refer to the combination of populism, authoritarianism and ultranationalism as "a marriage of convenience".[50]

Robert Paxton says:

[Fascism is] a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.[51]

Umberto Eco lists fourteen "features that are typical of what [he] would like to call 'Ur-Fascism', or 'Eternal Fascism'. These features cannot be organized into a system; many of them contradict each other, and are also typical of other kinds of despotism or fanaticism. But it is enough that one of them be present to allow fascism to coagulate around it."[52] Historian John Lukacs argues that there is no such thing as generic fascism. He claims that Nazism and communism are essentially manifestations of populism, and that states such as Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy are more different from each other than they are similar.[53]

Historian Emilio Gentile has defined fascism thusly:

[A] modern political phenomenon, revolutionary, anti-liberal, and anti-Marxist, organized in a militia party with a totalitarian conception of politics and the state, an activist and anti-theoretical ideology, with a mythical, virilistic and anti-hedonistic foundation, sacralized as a secular religion, which affirms the absolute primacy of the nation, understood as an ethnically homogeneous organic community, hierarchically organized in a corporate state, with a bellicose vocation to the politics of greatness, power, and conquest aimed at creating a new order and a new civilization.[54]

Historian and cultural critic Ruth Ben-Ghiat has described fascism as "the original phase of authoritarianism, along with early communism, when a population has undergone huge dislocations or they perceive that there's been changes in society that are very rapid, too rapid for their taste".[55]

Racism was a key feature of German fascism, for which the Holocaust was a high priority. According to The Historiography of Genocide, "In dealing with the Holocaust, it is the consensus of historians that Nazi Germany targeted Jews as a race, not as a religious group."[56] Several historians, such as Umberto Eco,[52] Kevin Passmore,[57] and Moyra Grant,[58] stress racism as a characteristic component of German fascism. Historian Robert Soucy stated, "Hitler envisioned the ideal German society as a Volksgemeinschaft, a racially unified and hierarchically organized body in which the interests of individuals would be strictly subordinate to those of the nation, or Volk."[59] Kershaw noted that common factors of fascism included "the 'cleansing' of all those deemed not to belong—foreigners, ethnic minorities, 'undesirables'"—and belief in its own nation's superiority, even if it was not biological racism like in Nazism.[43] Fascist philosophies vary by application, but remain distinct by one theoretical commonality: all traditionally fall into the far-right sector of any political spectrum, catalyzed by afflicted class identities over conventional social inequities.[1]

Position on the political spectrum

[edit]
Pro-government demonstration in Salamanca, Francoist Spain, in 1937. Francisco Franco was later labeled by some commentators the "last surviving fascist dictator".[60]

Scholars place fascism on the far right of the political spectrum.[1][6][7] Such scholarship focuses on its social conservatism and its authoritarian means of opposing egalitarianism.[61] Roderick Stackelberg places fascism—including Nazism, which he says is "a radical variant of fascism"—on the political right by explaining: "The more a person deems absolute equality among all people to be a desirable condition, the further left he or she will be on the ideological spectrum. The more a person considers inequality to be unavoidable or even desirable, the further to the right he or she will be."[62]

Fascism's origins are complex and include many seemingly contradictory viewpoints, ultimately centered on a mythos of national rebirth from decadence.[63] Fascism was founded during World War I by Italian national syndicalists who drew upon both left-wing organizational tactics and right-wing political views.[64] Italian fascism gravitated to the right in the early 1920s.[65] A major element of fascist ideology that has been deemed to be far right is its stated goal to promote the right of a supposedly superior people to dominate, while purging society of supposedly inferior elements.[66]

Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile described their ideology as right-wing in the political essay The Doctrine of Fascism (1932), stating: "We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the 'right,' a fascist century."[67] Mussolini stated that fascism's position on the political spectrum was not a serious issue for fascists: "[F]ascism, sitting on the right, could also have sat on the mountain of the center. ... These words in any case do not have a fixed and unchanged meaning: they do have a variable subject to location, time and spirit. We don't give a damn about these empty terminologies and we despise those who are terrorized by these words."[68]

Major Italian groups politically on the right, especially rich landowners and big business, feared an uprising by groups on the left, such as sharecroppers and labour unions.[69] They welcomed fascism and supported its violent suppression of opponents on the left.[70] The accommodation of the political right into the Italian Fascist movement in the early 1920s created internal factions within the movement. The "fascist left" included Michele Bianchi, Giuseppe Bottai, Angelo Oliviero Olivetti, Sergio Panunzio, and Edmondo Rossoni, who were committed to advancing national syndicalism as a replacement for parliamentary liberalism in order to modernize the economy and advance the interests of workers and the common people.[71] The "fascist right" included members of the paramilitary Blackshirts and former members of the Italian Nationalist Association (ANI).[71] The Blackshirts wanted to establish fascism as a complete dictatorship, while the former ANI members, including Alfredo Rocco, sought to institute an authoritarian corporatist state to replace the liberal state in Italy while retaining the existing elites.[71] Upon accommodating the political right, there arose a group of monarchist fascists who sought to use fascism to create an absolute monarchy under King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy.[71]

A number of post-World War II fascist movements described themselves as a "third position", outside the traditional political spectrum.[72] Falange Española de las JONS leader José Antonio Primo de Rivera said: "[B]asically the Right stands for the maintenance of an economic structure, albeit an unjust one, while the Left stands for the attempt to subvert that economic structure, even though the subversion thereof would entail the destruction of much that was worthwhile."[73]

Fascist as a pejorative

[edit]

The term fascist has been used as a pejorative,[74] regarding varying movements across the far right of the political spectrum. George Orwell noted in 1944 that the term had been used to denigrate diverse positions "in internal politics". Orwell said that while fascism is "a political and economic system" that was inconvenient to define, "as used, the word 'Fascism' is almost entirely meaningless. ... almost any English person would accept 'bully' as a synonym for 'Fascist'",[75] and in 1946 wrote that "'Fascism' has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies something not desirable."[76] Richard Griffiths of the University of Wales wrote in 2000 that "fascism" is the "most misused, and over-used word, of our times".[77] Fascist is sometimes applied to post-World War II organizations and ways of thinking that academics more commonly term neo-fascist.[78]

Despite fascist movements' history of anti-communism, Communist states have sometimes been referred to as fascist, typically as an insult. It has been applied to Marxist–Leninist regimes in Cuba under Fidel Castro and Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh.[79] Chinese Marxists used the term to denounce the Soviet Union during the Sino-Soviet split, and the Soviets used the term to denounce Chinese Marxists,[80] in addition to social democracy, coining a new term in social fascism. In the United States, Herbert Matthews of The New York Times asked in 1946: "Should we now place Stalinist Russia in the same category as Hitlerite Germany? Should we say that she is Fascist?"[81] J. Edgar Hoover, longtime FBI director and ardent anti-communist, wrote extensively of red fascism.[82] The Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s was sometimes called fascist. Historian Peter Amann states that, "Undeniably, the Klan had some traits in common with European fascism—chauvinism, racism, a mystique of violence, an affirmation of a certain kind of archaic traditionalism—yet their differences were fundamental ... [the KKK] never envisioned a change of political or economic system."[83]

History

[edit]

Background and 19th-century roots

[edit]
Bust of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato, whose works were admired by Mussolini[84]
Depiction of a Greek Hoplite warrior; ancient Sparta has been considered an inspiration for fascist and quasi-fascist movements, such as Nazism and quasi-fascist Metaxism[85]

Early influences that shaped the ideology of fascism have been dated back to ancient Greece. Mussolini had a strong attachment to the works of the Greek philosopher Plato.[86] In October 1943, Mussolini was reported to have kept Plato's work Republic on his desk at home, and he claimed to consult it from time to time before beginning his work each day.[87] The political culture of ancient Greece and specifically the ancient Greek city state of Sparta under Lycurgus, with its emphasis on militarism and racial purity, were admired by the Nazis.[88][89][90] Hitler emphasized that Germany should adhere to Hellenic values and culture – particularly that of ancient Sparta.[88][89]

Plato supported many similar political positions to fascism.[91] In his work Republic (c. 380 BC),[92] he emphasized the need for a philosopher king in an ideal state.[92] He believed the ideal state would be ruled by an elite class of rulers known as "Guardians" and rejected the idea of social equality.[91] He believed in an authoritarian state.[91] He held Athenian democracy in contempt by saying: "The laws of democracy remain a dead letter, its freedom is anarchy, its equality the equality of unequals".[91] Like fascism, he emphasized that individuals must adhere to laws and perform duties while declining to grant individuals rights to limit or reject state interference in their lives.[91] He claimed that an ideal state would have education that was designed to promote able rulers and warriors.[91] However, there are also significant differences between Plato's ideals and fascism.[91] Unlike fascism, he never promoted expansionism and he was opposed to offensive war.[91]

Georges Valois, founder of the first non-Italian fascist party Faisceau,[93] claimed the roots of fascism stemmed from the late 18th century Jacobin movement, seeing in its totalitarian nature a foreshadowing of the fascist state.[94] Historian George Mosse similarly analyzed fascism as an inheritor of the mass ideology and civil religion of the French Revolution, as well as a result of the brutalization of societies in 1914–1918.[94]

Historians such as Irene Collins and Howard C. Payne see Napoleon III, who ran a 'police state' and suppressed the media, as a forerunner of fascism.[95] According to David Thomson,[96] the Italian Risorgimento of 1871 led to the 'nemesis of fascism'. William L Shirer[97] sees a continuity from the views of Fichte and Hegel, through Bismarck, to Hitler; Robert Gerwarth speaks of a 'direct line' from Bismarck to Hitler.[98] Julian Dierkes sees fascism as a 'particularly violent form of imperialism'.[99]

Marcus Garvey, founder and leader of the Universal Negro Improvement Association, had described the organisation as "the first fascists".[100][undue weight?discuss] In 1938, C. L. R. James wrote "all the things that Hitler was to do so well later, Marcus Garvey was doing in 1920 and 1921".[101]

Fin de siècle era and lead up to World War I (1880–1914)

[edit]

The historian Zeev Sternhell has traced the ideological roots of fascism back to the 1880s and in particular to the fin de siècle theme of that time.[102] The theme was based on a revolt against materialism, rationalism, positivism, bourgeois society, and democracy.[103] The fin-de-siècle generation supported emotionalism, irrationalism, subjectivism, and vitalism.[104] They regarded civilization as being in crisis, and as requiring a massive and total solution.[103] Their intellectual school considered the individual as only one part of the larger collectivity, which should not be viewed as a numerical sum of atomized individuals.[103] They condemned the rationalistic, liberal individualism of society and the dissolution of social links in bourgeois society.[103]

The fin-de-siècle outlook was influenced by various intellectual developments, including Darwinian biology, Gesamtkunstwerk, Arthur de Gobineau's racialism, Gustave Le Bon's psychology, and the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, and Henri Bergson.[105] Social Darwinism, which gained widespread acceptance, made no distinction between physical and social life, and viewed the human condition as an unceasing struggle to achieve the survival of the fittest.[105] It challenged positivism's claim of deliberate and rational choice as the determining behaviour of humans, with social Darwinism focusing on heredity, race, and environment.[105] Its emphasis on biogroup identity and the role of organic relations within societies fostered the legitimacy and appeal of nationalism.[106] New theories of social and political psychology rejected the notion of human behaviour being governed by rational choice and instead claimed that emotion was more influential in political issues than reason.[105] Nietzsche's argument that "God is dead", coinciding with his attack on the "herd mentality" of Christianity, on democracy, and on modern collectivism, his concept of the Übermensch, and his advocacy of the will to power as a primordial instinct, were major influences upon many of the fin-de-siècle generation.[107] Bergson's claim of the existence of an élan vital, or vital instinct, centred upon free choice and rejected the processes of materialism and determinism; this challenged Marxism.[108]

In his work The Ruling Class (1896), Gaetano Mosca developed the theory that claims that in all societies an "organized minority" would dominate and rule over an "disorganized majority",[109] stating that there are only two classes in society, "the governing" (the organized minority) and "the governed" (the disorganized majority).[110] He claims that the organized nature of the organized minority makes it irresistible to any individual of the disorganized majority.[110]

French nationalist and reactionary monarchist Charles Maurras influenced fascism.[111] Maurras promoted what he called integral nationalism, which called for the organic unity of a nation, and insisted that a powerful monarch was an ideal leader of a nation. Maurras distrusted what he considered the democratic mystification of the popular will that created an impersonal collective subject.[111] He claimed that a powerful monarch was a personified sovereign who could exercise authority to unite a nation's people.[111] Fascists idealized Maurras' integral nationalism, but modified into a modernized revolutionary form - devoid of Maurras' monarchism.[111]

French revolutionary syndicalist Georges Sorel (1847-1922) promoted the legitimacy of political violence in his work Reflections on Violence (1908) and in other works in which he advocated radical syndicalist action to achieve a revolution to overthrow capitalism and the bourgeoisie through a general strike.[112] In Reflections on Violence, Sorel emphasized need for a revolutionary political religion.[113] Also in his work The Illusions of Progress (1908), Sorel denounced democracy as reactionary, stating that "nothing is more aristocratic than democracy".[114] By 1909, after the failure of a syndicalist general strike in France, Sorel and his supporters left the radical left and went to the radical right, where they sought to merge militant Catholicism and French patriotism with their views—advocating anti-republican Christian French patriots as ideal revolutionaries.[115] Initially, Sorel had officially been a revisionist of Marxism, but by 1910 he had announced his abandonment of socialist literature. In 1914, using an aphorism of Benedetto Croce, he claimed that "socialism is dead" because of the "decomposition of Marxism".[116] Sorel began to support reactionary Maurrassian nationalism beginning in 1909, and this influenced his works.[116] Maurras held interest in merging his nationalist ideals with Sorelian syndicalism, known as Sorelianism, as a means to confront democracy.[117] Maurras stated, "A socialism liberated from the democratic and cosmopolitan element fits nationalism well as a well made glove fits a beautiful hand."[118]

The fusion of Maurrassian nationalism and Sorelian syndicalism influenced radical Italian nationalist Enrico Corradini (1865-1931).[119] Corradini spoke of the need for a nationalist-syndicalist movement, led by elitist aristocrats and anti-democrats who shared a revolutionary syndicalist commitment to direct action and a willingness to fight.[119] Corradini spoke of Italy as being a "proletarian nation" that needed to pursue imperialism in order to challenge the "plutocratic" French and British.[120] Corradini's views were part of a wider set of perceptions within the right-wing Italian Nationalist Association (ANI, founded in 1910), which claimed that Italy's economic backwardness was caused by corruption in its political class, liberalism, and division caused by "ignoble socialism".[120]

The ANI had ties and influence among conservatives, Catholics, and the business community.[121] Italian national syndicalists held a common set of principles: the rejection of bourgeois values, democracy, liberalism, Marxism, internationalism, and pacifism, and the promotion of heroism, vitalism, and violence.[122] The ANI claimed that liberal democracy was no longer compatible with the modern world, and advocated a strong state and imperialism. They believed that humans are naturally predatory, and that nations are in a constant struggle in which only the strongest would survive.[123]

Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, Italian modernist author of the Futurist Manifesto (1909) and later the co-author of the Fascist Manifesto (1919)[124]

Futurism was both an artistic-cultural movement and initially a political movement in Italy led by Filippo Tommaso Marinetti (1876-1944) who wrote the Manifesto of Futurism (1908), that championed the causes of modernism, action, and political violence as necessary elements of politics while denouncing liberalism and parliamentary politics.[125][126][page needed] Marinetti rejected conventional democracy - based on majority rule and egalitarianism - for a new form of democracy, promoting what he described in his work "The Futurist Conception of Democracy" as the following: "We are therefore able to give the directions to create and to dismantle to numbers, to quantity, to the mass, for with us number, quantity and mass will never be—as they are in Germany and Russia—the number, quantity and mass of mediocre men, incapable and indecisive."[127]

Futurism influenced fascism in its emphasis on recognizing the virile nature of violent action and war as necessities of modern civilization.[128] Marinetti promoted the need of physical training of young men, saying that, in male education, gymnastics should take precedence over books. He advocated segregation of the genders because womanly sensibility must not enter men's education, which he claimed must be "lively, bellicose, muscular and violently dynamic".[129]

World War I and its aftermath (1914–1929)

[edit]
Benito Mussolini in 1917 as an Italian soldier in World War I

At the outbreak of World War I in August 1914, the Italian political left became severely split over its position on the war. The Italian Socialist Party (PSI) opposed the war but a number of Italian revolutionary syndicalists supported war against Germany and Austria-Hungary on the grounds that their reactionary regimes had to be defeated to ensure the success of socialism.[130] Angelo Oliviero Olivetti formed a pro-interventionist fascio called the Revolutionary Fasces of International Action in October 1914.[130] Benito Mussolini upon being expelled from his position as chief editor of the PSI's newspaper Avanti! for his anti-German stance, joined the interventionist cause in a separate fascio.[131] The term "fascism" was first used in 1915 by members of Mussolini's movement, the Fasces of Revolutionary Action.[132]

The first meeting of the Fasces of Revolutionary Action was held on 24 January 1915[133] when Mussolini declared that it was necessary for Europe to resolve its national problems—including national borders—of Italy and elsewhere "for the ideals of justice and liberty for which oppressed peoples must acquire the right to belong to those national communities from which they descended."[133] Attempts to hold mass meetings were ineffective and the organization was regularly harassed by government authorities and socialists.[134]

Adolf Hitler as a German soldier in World War I

Similar political ideas arose in Germany after the outbreak of the war. German sociologist Johann Plenge spoke of the rise of a "National Socialism" in Germany within what he termed the "ideas of 1914" that were a declaration of war against the "ideas of 1789" (the French Revolution).[135] According to Plenge, the "ideas of 1789"—such as the rights of man, democracy, individualism and liberalism—were being rejected in favor of "the ideas of 1914" that included "German values" of duty, discipline, law and order.[135] Plenge believed that racial solidarity (Volksgemeinschaft) would replace class division and that "racial comrades" would unite to create a socialist society in the struggle of "proletarian" Germany against "capitalist" Britain.[135] He believed that the Spirit of 1914 manifested itself in the concept of the People's League of National Socialism.[136] This National Socialism was a form of state socialism that rejected the "idea of boundless freedom" and promoted an economy that would serve the whole of Germany under the leadership of the state.[136] This National Socialism was opposed to capitalism because of the components that were against "the national interest" of Germany but insisted that National Socialism would strive for greater efficiency in the economy.[136] Plenge advocated an authoritarian rational ruling elite to develop National Socialism through a hierarchical technocratic state.[137]

Impact of World War I

[edit]
Members of Italy's Arditi corps, shown here in 1918 holding daggers, a symbol of their group. They were formed in 1917 as groups of soldiers trained for dangerous missions, characterized by a refusal to surrender and a willingness to fight to the death. Their black uniforms inspired those of the Italian Fascist movement.[138]

Fascists viewed World War I as bringing revolutionary changes in the nature of war, society, the state and technology, as the advent of total war and mass mobilization had broken down the distinction between civilian and combatant, as civilians had become a critical part in economic production for the war effort and thus arose a "military citizenship" in which all citizens were involved to the military in some manner during the war.[9] World War I had resulted in the rise of a powerful state capable of mobilizing millions of people to serve on the front lines or provide economic production and logistics to support those on the front lines, as well as having unprecedented authority to intervene in the lives of citizens.[9] Fascists viewed technological developments of weaponry and the state's total mobilization of its population in the war as symbolizing the beginning of a new era fusing state power with mass politics, technology and particularly the mobilizing myth that they contended had triumphed over the myth of progress and the era of liberalism.[139]

Impact of the October Revolution in Russia

[edit]

The October Revolution of 1917, in which Bolshevik communists led by Vladimir Lenin seized power in Russia, greatly influenced the development of fascism.[140] In 1917, Mussolini, as leader of the Fasces of Revolutionary Action, praised the October Revolution, but later he became unimpressed with Lenin, regarding him as merely a new version of Tsar Nicholas II.[141] After World War I, fascists commonly campaigned on anti-Marxist agendas.[140]

Andreas Umland argues that there are similarities between fascism and Bolshevism, including that they believed in the necessity of a vanguard leadership, showed contempt for bourgeois values, and had totalitarian ambitions.[140] He says that in practice both have commonly emphasized revolutionary action, proletarian nation theories, one-party states, and party-armies;[140] With the antagonism between anti-interventionist Marxists and pro-interventionist fascists complete by the end of the war, the two sides became irreconcilable.[citation needed] The fascists presented themselves as anti-communists and as especially opposed to the Marxists.[142] In 1919, Mussolini consolidated control over the fascist movement, known as Sansepolcrismo, with the founding of the Italian Fasces of Combat.[70]

Fascist Manifesto and Charter of Carnaro

[edit]
Territories promised to Italy by the Treaty of London (1915): Trentino-Alto Adige, the Julian March and Dalmatia (tan) and the Snežnik Plateau area (green).[143] However, after World War I, while Italy annexed the capital city Zara of Dalmatia the rest of Dalmatia was not assigned to Italy but to Yugoslavia.[citation needed]

In 1919, Alceste De Ambris and futurist movement leader Filippo Tommaso Marinetti created "The Manifesto of the Italian Fasces of Combat".[124] The Fascist Manifesto was presented on 6 June 1919 in the fascist newspaper Il Popolo d'Italia and supported the creation of universal suffrage, including women's suffrage (the latter being realized only partly in late 1925, with all opposition parties banned or disbanded);[144] proportional representation on a regional basis; government representation through a corporatist system of "National Councils" of experts, selected from professionals and tradespeople, elected to represent and hold legislative power over their respective areas, including labour, industry, transportation, public health, and communications, among others; and abolition of the Senate of the Kingdom of Italy.[145] The Fascist Manifesto supported the creation of an eight-hour work day for all workers, a minimum wage, worker representation in industrial management, equal confidence in labour unions as in industrial executives and public servants, reorganization of the transportation sector, revision of the draft law on invalidity insurance, reduction of the retirement age from 65 to 55, a strong progressive tax on capital, confiscation of the property of religious institutions and abolishment of bishoprics, and revision of military contracts to allow the government to seize 85% of profits.[146] It also called for the fulfillment of expansionist aims in the Balkans and other parts of the Mediterranean, the creation of a short-service national militia to serve defensive duties, nationalization of the armaments industry, and a foreign policy designed to be peaceful but also competitive.[147]

Residents of Fiume, now Rijeka, Croatia, cheer the arrival of Gabriele d'Annunzio and his blackshirt-wearing nationalist raiders, as D'Annunzio and fascist Alceste De Ambris developed the quasi-fascist Italian Regency of Carnaro (a city-state in Fiume) from 1919 to 1920 and whose actions inspired the Italian fascist movement. The Italians claimed Fiume on the principle of self-determination, disregarding the 50.4% of its population that were Yugoslavs.[148]

The next events that influenced the fascists in Italy were the raid of Fiume by Italian nationalist Gabriele d'Annunzio and the founding of the Charter of Carnaro in 1920.[149] D'Annunzio and De Ambris designed the Charter, which advocated national-syndicalist corporatist productionism alongside D'Annunzio's political views.[150] Many fascists saw the Charter of Carnaro as an ideal constitution for a fascist Italy.[151] This behaviour of aggression towards Yugoslavia and South Slavs was pursued by Italian fascists with their persecution of South Slavs—especially Slovenes and Croats.[152][153]

Accommodating conservatives

[edit]

In 1920, militant strike activity by industrial workers reached its peak in Italy and 1919 and 1920 were known as the "Red Year" (Biennio Rosso).[154] Mussolini and the fascists took advantage of the situation by allying with industrial businesses and attacking workers and peasants in the name of preserving order and internal peace in Italy.[155]

Fascists identified their primary opponents as the majority of socialists on the left who had opposed intervention in World War I.[151] The fascists and the Italian political right held common ground: both held Marxism in contempt, discounted class consciousness and believed in the rule of elites.[156] The fascists assisted the anti-socialist campaign by allying with the other parties and the conservative right in a mutual effort to destroy the Italian Socialist Party and labour organizations committed to class identity above national identity.[156]

Fascism sought to accommodate Italian conservatives by making major alterations to its political agenda—abandoning its previous populism, republicanism and anticlericalism, adopting policies in support of free enterprise and accepting the Catholic Church and the monarchy as institutions in Italy.[157] To appeal to Italian conservatives, fascism adopted policies such as promoting family values, including policies designed to reduce the number of women in the workforce—limiting the woman's role to that of a mother. The fascists banned literature on birth control and increased penalties for abortion in 1926, declaring both crimes against the state.[158]

Although fascism adopted a number of anti-modern positions designed to appeal to people upset with the new trends in sexuality and women's rights—especially those with a reactionary point of view—the fascists sought to maintain fascism's revolutionary character, with Angelo Oliviero Olivetti saying: "Fascism would like to be conservative, but it will [be] by being revolutionary."[159] The Fascists supported revolutionary action and committed to secure law and order to appeal to both conservatives and syndicalists.[160]

Prior to fascism's accommodations to the political right, fascism was a small, urban, northern Italian movement that had about a thousand members.[161] After Fascism's accommodation of the political right, the fascist movement's membership soared to approximately 250,000 by 1921.[162] A 2020 article by Daron Acemoğlu, Giuseppe De Feo, Giacomo De Luca, and Gianluca Russo in the Center for Economic and Policy Research, exploring the link between the threat of socialism and Mussolini's rise to power, found "a strong association between the Red Scare in Italy and the subsequent local support for the Fascist Party in the early 1920s."[163] According to the authors, it was local elites and large landowners who played an important role in boosting Fascist Party activity and support, which did not come from socialists' core supporters but from centre-right voters, as they viewed traditional centre-right parties as ineffective in stopping socialism and so turned to the fascists.[163] In 2003, historian Adrian Lyttelton wrote: "The expansion of Fascism in the rural areas was stimulated and directed by the reaction of the farmers and landowners against the peasant leagues of both Socialists and Catholics."[163]

Fascist violence

[edit]

Beginning in 1922, fascist paramilitaries escalated their strategy from one of attacking socialist offices and the homes of socialist leadership figures, to one of violent occupation of cities. The fascists met little serious resistance from authorities and proceeded to take over several northern Italian cities.[164] The fascists attacked the headquarters of socialist and Catholic labour unions in Cremona and imposed forced Italianization upon the German-speaking population of Bolzano.[164][165] After seizing these cities, the fascists made plans to take Rome.[164]

Benito Mussolini with three of the four quadrumvirs during the March on Rome (from left to right: unknown, de Bono, Mussolini, Balbo and de Vecchi)[166]

On 24 October 1922, the Fascist Party held its annual congress in Naples, where Mussolini ordered Blackshirts to take control of public buildings and trains and to converge on three points around Rome.[164] The Fascists managed to seize control of several post offices and trains in northern Italy while the Italian government, led by a left-wing coalition, was internally divided and unable to respond to the Fascist advances.[167] King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy perceived the risk of bloodshed in Rome in response to attempting to disperse the Fascists to be too high.[168] Victor Emmanuel III decided to appoint Mussolini as Prime Minister of Italy and Mussolini arrived in Rome on 30 October to accept the appointment.[168] Fascist propaganda aggrandized this event, known as "March on Rome", as a "seizure" of power because of Fascists' heroic exploits.[164]

Fascist Italy

[edit]

Mussolini in power

[edit]
Victor Emmanuel III, King of Italy, with Mussolini.

Upon being appointed Prime Minister of Italy, Mussolini had to form a coalition government because the fascists did not have control over the Italian parliament.[169] Mussolini's coalition government initially pursued economically liberal policies under the direction of liberal finance minister Alberto De Stefani, a member of the Center Party, including balancing the budget through deep cuts to the civil service.[169] Initially, little drastic change in government policy had occurred and repressive police actions were limited.[169]

The fascists began their attempt to entrench fascism in Italy with the Acerbo Law, which guaranteed a plurality of the seats in parliament to any party or coalition list in an election that received 25% or more of the vote.[170] Through considerable fascist violence and intimidation, the list won a majority of the vote, allowing many seats to go to the fascists.[170] In the aftermath of the election, a crisis and political scandal erupted after Socialist Party deputy Giacomo Matteotti was kidnapped and murdered by a Fascist.[170] The liberals and the leftist minority in parliament walked out in protest in what became known as the Aventine Secession.[171] On 3 January 1925, Mussolini addressed the Fascist-dominated Italian parliament and declared that he was personally responsible for what happened, but insisted that he had done nothing wrong. Mussolini proclaimed himself dictator of Italy, assuming full responsibility over the government and announcing the dismissal of parliament.[171] From 1925 to 1929, fascism steadily became entrenched in power: opposition deputies were denied access to parliament, censorship was introduced and a December 1925 decree made Mussolini solely responsible to the King.[172]

Catholic Church

[edit]
The signing of the Lateran Treaty, Mussolini shown on the right side of the photograph.

In 1929, the fascist regime briefly gained what was in effect a blessing of the Catholic Church after the regime signed a concordat with the Church, known as the Lateran Treaty, which gave the papacy state sovereignty and financial compensation for the seizure of Church lands by the liberal state in the 19th century, but within two years the Church had renounced fascism in the Encyclical Non Abbiamo Bisogno as a "pagan idolatry of the state" which teaches "hatred, violence and irreverence".[173] Not long after signing the agreement, by Mussolini's own confession, the Church had threatened to have him "excommunicated", in part because of his intractable nature, but also because he had "confiscated more issues of Catholic newspapers in the next three months than in the previous seven years."[174] By the late 1930s, Mussolini became more vocal in his anti-clerical rhetoric, repeatedly denouncing the Catholic Church and discussing ways to depose the pope. He took the position that the "papacy was a malignant tumor in the body of Italy and must 'be rooted out once and for all,' because there was no room in Rome for both the Pope and himself."[175] In her 1974 book, Mussolini's widow Rachele stated that her husband had always been an atheist until near the end of his life, writing that her husband was "basically irreligious until the later years of his life."[176]

The Nazis in Germany employed similar anti-clerical policies.[177] The Gestapo confiscated hundreds of monasteries in Austria and Germany, evicted clergymen and laymen alike and often replaced crosses with swastikas.[178] Referring to the swastika as "the Devil's Cross", church leaders found their youth organizations banned, their meetings limited and various Catholic periodicals censored or banned. Government officials eventually found it necessary to place "Nazis into editorial positions in the Catholic press."[179] Up to 2,720 clerics, mostly Catholics, were arrested by the Gestapo and imprisoned inside of Germany's Dachau concentration camp, resulting in over 1,000 deaths.[180]

Corporatist economic system

[edit]

The fascist regime created a corporatist economic system in 1925 with creation of the Palazzo Vidoni Pact, in which the Italian employers' association Confindustria and fascist trade unions agreed to recognize each other as the sole representatives of Italy's employers and employees, excluding non-fascist trade unions.[181] The Fascist regime first created a Ministry of Corporations that organized the Italian economy into 22 sectoral corporations, banned workers' strikes and lock-outs and in 1927 created the Charter of Labour, which established workers' rights and duties and created labour tribunals to arbitrate employer-employee disputes.[181] In practice, the sectoral corporations exercised little independence and were largely controlled by the regime, and the employee organizations were rarely led by employees themselves, but instead by appointed Fascist party members.[181]

Aggressive foreign policy

[edit]
Inmates at the Sid Ahmed el Maghrun concentration camp in Libya during the Second Italo-Senussi War.[182]

In the 1920s, Fascist Italy pursued an aggressive foreign policy that included ambitions to expand Italian territory.[183] In response to revolt in the Italian colony of Libya, Fascist Italy abandoned previous liberal-era colonial policy of cooperation with local leaders. Instead, claiming that Italians were a superior race to African races and thereby had the right to colonize the "inferior" Africans, it sought to settle 10 to 15 million Italians in Libya.[184] This resulted in an aggressive military campaign known as the Second Italo-Senussi War also known as the Pacification of Libya against natives in Libya, including mass killings, the use of concentration camps and the forced starvation of thousands of people.[184] Italian authorities committed ethnic cleansing by forcibly expelling 100,000 Bedouin Cyrenaicans, half the population of Cyrenaica in Libya, from their settlements that was slated to be given to Italian settlers.[185]

Nazi adoption of the Italian model

[edit]
Nazis in Munich during the Beer Hall Putsch

The March on Rome brought fascism international attention. One early admirer of the Italian fascists was Adolf Hitler, who less than a month after the March had begun to model himself and the Nazi Party upon Mussolini and the Fascists.[186] The Nazis, led by Hitler and the German war hero Erich Ludendorff, attempted a "March on Berlin" modeled upon the March on Rome, which resulted in the failed Beer Hall Putsch in Munich in November 1923.[187]

International impact of the Great Depression and buildup to World War II

[edit]
Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany, in 1934[188]
Hungarian Prime Minister Gyula Gömbös (left) meeting with Mussolini (right).

The conditions of economic hardship caused by the Great Depression brought about an international surge of social unrest.[189] Fascist propaganda blamed the problems of the long depression of the 1930s on minorities and scapegoats: "Judeo-Masonic-bolshevik" conspiracies, left-wing internationalism and the presence of immigrants.[190]

In Germany, it contributed to the rise of the Nazi Party, which resulted in the demise of the Weimar Republic and the establishment of the fascist regime, Nazi Germany, under the leadership of Adolf Hitler.[191][192] With the rise of Hitler and the Nazis to power in 1933, liberal democracy was dissolved in Germany and the Nazis mobilized the country for war, with expansionist territorial aims against several countries.[193][194] In the 1930s, the Nazis implemented racial laws that deliberately discriminated against, disenfranchised and persecuted Jews and other racial and minority groups.[195]

Fascist movements grew in strength elsewhere in Europe. Hungarian fascist Gyula Gömbös rose to power as Prime Minister of Hungary in 1932 and attempted to entrench his Unity Party throughout the country.[citation needed] He created an eight-hour work day and a forty-eight-hour work week in industry; sought to entrench a corporatist economy; and pursued irredentist claims on Hungary's neighbors.[196] The fascist Iron Guard movement in Romania soared in political support after 1933, gaining representation in the Romanian government, and an Iron Guard member assassinated Romanian prime minister Ion Duca.[197] The Iron Guard was the only fascist movement outside Germany and Italy to come to power without foreign assistance.[198][199] During the 6 February 1934 crisis, France faced the greatest domestic political turmoil since the Dreyfus Affair when the fascist Francist Movement and multiple far-right movements rioted en masse in Paris against the French government resulting in major political violence.[200] A variety of para-fascist governments that borrowed elements from fascism were formed during the Great Depression, including those of Greece, Lithuania, Poland and Yugoslavia.[201] In the Netherlands, the National Socialist Movement in the Netherlands was at its height in the 1930s due to the Great Depression, especially in 1935 when it won almost eight percent of votes, until the year 1937.[11]

Integralists marching in Brazil
Luis A. Flores, Prime Minister of Peru in 1932, shown saluting in the party uniform of the Revolutionary Union of Peru that he led as its Supreme Chief from 1933–1956.[202][203]

In the Americas, the Brazilian Integralists led by Plínio Salgado claimed as many as 200,000 members, although following coup attempts it faced a crackdown from the Estado Novo of Getúlio Vargas in 1937.[204] In Peru, the Revolutionary Union was a fascist political party which was in power 1931 to 1933. In the 1930s, the National Socialist Movement of Chile gained seats in Chile's parliament and attempted a coup d'état that resulted in the Seguro Obrero massacre of 1938.[205]

During the Great Depression, Mussolini promoted active state intervention in the economy. He denounced the contemporary "supercapitalism" that he claimed began in 1914 as a failure because of its alleged decadence, its support for unlimited consumerism, and its intention to create the "standardization of humankind."[206] Fascist Italy created the Institute for Industrial Reconstruction (IRI), a giant state-owned firm and holding company that provided state funding to failing private enterprises.[207] The IRI was made a permanent institution in Fascist Italy in 1937, pursued fascist policies to create national autarky and had the power to take over private firms to maximize war production.[207] While Hitler's regime only nationalized 500 companies in key industries by the early 1940s,[208] Mussolini declared in 1934, "[t]hree-fourths of Italian economy, industrial and agricultural, is in the hands of the state."[209]

Due to the worldwide depression, Mussolini's government was able to take over most of Italy's largest failing banks, who held controlling interest in many Italian businesses. The IRI reported in early 1934 that they held assets of "48.5 percent of the share capital of Italy", which later included the capital of the banks themselves.[210] Political historian Martin Blinkhorn estimated Italy's scope of state intervention and ownership "greatly surpassed that in Nazi Germany, giving Italy a public sector second only to that of Stalin's Russia."[211] In the late 1930s, Italy enacted manufacturing cartels, tariff barriers, currency restrictions and massive regulation of the economy to attempt to balance payments.[212] Italy's policy of autarky failed to achieve effective economic autonomy.[212] Nazi Germany similarly pursued an economic agenda with the aims of autarky and rearmament and imposed protectionist policies, including forcing the German steel industry to use lower-quality German iron ore rather than superior-quality imported iron.[213]

World War II (1939–1945)

[edit]
Map of World War II in Europe from 1941-1942. Axis powers shown in red and Allied powers shown in blue.

In Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, both Mussolini and Hitler pursued territorial expansionist and interventionist foreign policy agendas from the 1930s through the 1940s culminating in World War II.[citation needed] From 1935 to 1939, Germany and Italy escalated their demands for territorial claims and greater influence in world affairs. Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1935 resulting in its condemnation by the League of Nations and its widespread diplomatic isolation.[citation needed] In 1936, Germany remilitarized the industrial Rhineland, a region that had been ordered demilitarized by the Treaty of Versailles. In 1938, Germany annexed Austria[214][215] and Italy assisted Germany in resolving the diplomatic crisis between Germany versus Britain and France over claims on Czechoslovakia by arranging the Munich Agreement that gave Germany the Sudetenland and was perceived at the time to have averted a European war.[216][217] These hopes faded when Czechoslovakia was dissolved by the proclamation of the German client state of Slovakia, followed by the next day of the occupation of the remaining Czech Lands and the proclamation of the German Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia. At the same time from 1938 to 1939, Italy was demanding territorial and colonial concessions from France and Britain.[218] In 1939, Germany prepared for war with Poland, but attempted to gain territorial concessions from Poland through diplomatic means.[219] The Polish government did not trust Hitler's promises and refused to accept Germany's demands.[219]

The invasion of Poland by Germany was deemed unacceptable by Britain, France and their allies, leading to their mutual declaration of war against Germany and the start of World War II.[220][221] In 1940, Mussolini led Italy into World War II on the side of the Axis. During World War II, the Axis Powers in Europe led by Nazi Germany participated in the extermination of millions of Poles, Jews, Roma, Sinti and others in the genocide known as the Holocaust.[222][223][224] In 1943, after Italy faced multiple military failures, the complete reliance and subordination of Italy to Germany, the Allied invasion of Italy and the corresponding international humiliation, Mussolini was removed as head of government and arrested on the order of King Victor Emmanuel III, who proceeded to dismantle the Fascist state and declared Italy's switching of allegiance to the Allied side.[citation needed] Mussolini was rescued from arrest by German forces and led the German client state, the Italian Social Republic from 1943 to 1945. Nazi Germany faced multiple losses and steady Soviet and Western Allied offensives from 1943 to 1945.[225]

On 28 April 1945, Mussolini was captured and executed by Italian communist partisans. On 30 April 1945, Hitler committed suicide.[226] Shortly afterwards, Germany surrendered and the Nazi regime was systematically dismantled by the occupying Allied powers. An International Military Tribunal was subsequently convened in Nuremberg. Beginning in November 1945 and lasting through 1949, numerous Nazi political, military and economic leaders were tried and convicted of war crimes, with many of the worst offenders being sentenced to death and executed.[227][228]

Post-World War II (1945–2008)

[edit]

The victory of the Allies over the Axis powers in World War II led to the collapse of many fascist regimes in Europe. The Nuremberg Trials convicted several Nazi leaders of crimes against humanity involving the Holocaust.[229] However, there remained several movements and governments that were ideologically related to fascism.[230]

Francisco Franco's Falangist one-party state in Spain was officially neutral during World War II, although Franco's rise to power had been directly assisted by the militaries of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany during the Spanish Civil War.[231][232] The first years were characterized by a repression against the anti-fascist ideologies, deep censorship and the suppression of democratic institutions (elected Parliament, Spanish Constitution of 1931, Regional Statutes of Autonomy).[233][234] After World War II and a period of international isolation, Franco's regime normalized relations with the Western powers during the Cold War, until Franco's death in 1975 and the transformation of Spain into a liberal democracy.[235]

Historian Robert Paxton observes that one of the main problems in defining fascism is that it was widely mimicked. Paxton says: "In fascism's heyday, in the 1930s, many regimes that were not functionally fascist borrowed elements of fascist decor in order to lend themselves an aura of force, vitality, and mass mobilization." He goes on to observe that Salazar "crushed Portuguese fascism after he had copied some of its techniques of popular mobilization."[236] Paxton says: "Where Franco subjected Spain's fascist party to his personal control, Salazar abolished outright in July 1934 the nearest thing Portugal had to an authentic fascist movement, Rolão Preto's blue-shirted National Syndicalists. ... Salazar preferred to control his population through such 'organic' institutions traditionally powerful in Portugal as the Church. Salazar's regime was not only non-fascist, but 'voluntarily non-totalitarian,' preferring to let those of its citizens who kept out of politics 'live by habit.'"[237] However, historians tend to view the Estado Novo as para-fascist in nature,[238] possessing minimal fascist tendencies.[239] Other historians, including Fernando Rosas and Manuel Villaverde Cabral, think that the Estado Novo should be considered fascist.[240]

Giorgio Almirante, leader of the Italian Social Movement from 1969 to 1987[241]

The term neo-fascism refers to fascist movements that generally originated after World War II. According to Jean-Yves Camus and Nicolas Lebourg, the neo-fascist ideology emerged in 1942, after Nazi Germany invaded the USSR and decided to reorient its propaganda on a Europeanist ground.[242] In Italy, the Italian Social Movement led by Giorgio Almirante was a major neo-fascist movement that transformed itself into a self-described "post-fascist" movement called the National Alliance (AN),[243] which has been an ally of Silvio Berlusconi's Forza Italia for a decade.[244] In 2008, AN joined Forza Italia in Berlusconi's new party The People of Freedom, but in 2012 a group of politicians split from The People of Freedom, refounding the party with the name Brothers of Italy.[245][246] In Germany, various neo-Nazi movements have been formed and banned in accordance with Germany's constitutional law which forbids Nazism. The National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD) is widely considered a neo-Nazi party, although the party does not publicly identify itself as such.[247]

In Argentina, Peronism, associated with the regime of Juan Perón from 1946 to 1955 and 1973 to 1974, was influenced by fascism.[248][249] Between 1939 and 1941, prior to his rise to power, Perón had developed a deep admiration of Italian Fascism and modelled his economic policies on Italian fascist policies.[248] However, not all historians agree with this identification,[250] which they consider debatable[251] or even false,[252] biased by a pejorative political position.[253] Other authors, such as the historian Raanan Rein, categorically maintain that Perón was not a fascist and that this characterization was imposed on him because of his defiant stance against US hegemony.[254]

Contemporary fascism (2008–present)

[edit]

Greece

[edit]
Golden Dawn demonstration in Greece in 2012

After the onset of the Great Recession and economic crisis in Greece, a movement known as the Golden Dawn, widely considered a neo-Nazi party,[255] soared in support out of obscurity and won seats in Greece's parliament,[256] espousing a staunch hostility towards minorities, illegal immigrants and refugees.[257] In 2013, after the murder of an anti-fascist musician by a person with links to Golden Dawn, the Greek government ordered the arrest of Golden Dawn's leader Nikolaos Michaloliakos and other members on charges related to being associated with a criminal organization.[258][259] On 7 October 2020, Athens Appeals Court announced verdicts for 68 defendants, including the party's political leadership. Nikolaos Michaloliakos and six other prominent members and former members of parliament (MPs) were found guilty of running a criminal organization.[260] Guilty verdicts were delivered on charges of murder, attempted murder, and violent attacks on immigrants and left-wing political opponents.[261]

Post-Soviet Russia

[edit]

Marlene Laruelle, a French political scientist, contends in Is Russia Fascist? that the accusation of "fascist" has evolved into a strategic narrative of the existing world order.[262] Geopolitical rivals might construct their own view of the world and assert the moral high ground by branding ideological rivals as fascists, regardless of their real ideals or deeds.[263] Laruelle discusses the basis, significance, and veracity of accusations of fascism in and around Russia through an analysis of the domestic situation in Russia and the Kremlin's foreign policy justifications; she concludes that Russian efforts to brand its opponents as fascist is ultimately an attempt to determine the future of Russia in Europe as an antifascist force, influenced by its role in fighting fascism in World War II.[264]

According to Alexander J. Motyl, an American historian and political scientist, Russian fascism has the following characteristics:[265][266]

Protester against the Russian government, holding an image portraying Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin as Nazis with a swastika made of colours of the Ribbon of Saint George and a Russian coat of arms in the centre (Odesa, 2014)

Yale historian Timothy Snyder has stated, "Putin's regime is ... the world center of fascism" and has written an article entitled "We Should Say It: Russia Is Fascist."[268] Oxford historian Roger Griffin compared Putin's Russia to the World War II-era Empire of Japan, saying that like Putin's Russia, it "emulated fascism in many ways, but was not fascist."[269] Historian Stanley G. Payne says Putin's Russia "is not equivalent to the fascist regimes of World War II, but it forms the nearest analogue to fascism found in a major country since that time" and argues that Putin's political system is "more a revival of the creed of Tsar Nicholas I in the 19th century that emphasized 'Orthodoxy, autocracy, and nationality' than one resembling the revolutionary, modernizing regimes of Hitler and Mussolini."[269] According to Griffin, fascism is "a revolutionary form of nationalism" seeking to destroy the old system and remake society, and that Putin is a reactionary politician who is not trying to create a new order "but to recreate a modified version of the Soviet Union". German political scientist Andreas Umland said genuine fascists in Russia, like deceased politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky and activist and self-styled philosopher Aleksandr Dugin, "describe in their writings a completely new Russia" controlling parts of the world that were never under tsarist or Soviet domination.[269] According to Marlene Laurelle writing in The Washington Quarterly, "applying the "fascism" label ... to the entirety of the Russian state or society short-circuits our ability to construct a more complex and differentiated picture."[270]

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, collecting the opinions of experts on fascism, said that while Russia is repressive and authoritarian, it cannot be classified as a fascist state for various reasons, including Russia's government being more reactionary than revolutionary.[269] In 2023, Oleg Orlov, the chairman of the Board of Human Rights Center "Memorial", claimed that Russia under Vladimir Putin had descended into fascism and that the army is committing "mass murder".[271][272] On 7 March 2024, in his 2024 State of the Union Address, American President Joe Biden compared Russia under Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler's conquests of Europe.[273]

United States

[edit]

While initially composed of distinctive movements, in the 21st century, many U.S. Neo-Nazi groups have moved towards more decentralized organization and online social networks with a terroristic focus.[274] After the election of Donald Trump, fascist groups began coalescing around his right-wing populism to take advantage of it.[275] In 2017, the Unite the Right rally[276] saw marchers come together from a variety of far-right groups and movements, including members of the alt-right,[277] neo-Confederates,[278] neo-fascists,[279] white nationalists,[280] neo-Nazis,[281] Klansmen,[282] and far-right militias.[283] Around this period, a number of prominent fascist groups were also founded, including the Proud boys and Patriot Front.[284][285]

Tenets

[edit]

Robert Paxton finds that even though fascism "maintained the existing regime of property and social hierarchy", it cannot be considered "simply a more muscular form of conservatism" because "fascism in power did carry out some changes profound enough to be called 'revolutionary.'"[286] These transformations "often set fascists into conflict with conservatives rooted in families, churches, social rank, and property." Paxton argues:

fascism redrew the frontiers between private and public, sharply diminishing what had once been untouchably private. It changed the practice of citizenship from the enjoyment of constitutional rights and duties to participation in mass ceremonies of affirmation and conformity. It reconfigured relations between the individual and the collectivity, so that an individual had no rights outside community interest. It expanded the powers of the executive—party and state—in a bid for total control. Finally, it unleashed aggressive emotions hitherto known in Europe only during war or social revolution.[286]

Ultranationalism

[edit]

Ultranationalism, combined with the myth of national rebirth, is a key foundation of fascism.[287] Robert Paxton argues that "a passionate nationalism" is the basis of fascism, combined with "a conspiratorial and Manichean view of history" which holds, "the chosen people have been weakened by political parties, social classes, unassimilable minorities, spoiled rentiers, and rationalist thinkers."[288] Roger Griffin identifies the core of fascism as being palingenetic ultranationalism.[37]

The fascist view of a nation is of a single organic entity that binds people together by their ancestry and is a natural unifying force of people.[289] Fascism seeks to solve economic, political, and social problems by achieving a millenarian national rebirth, exalting the nation or race above all else and promoting cults of unity, strength, and purity.[290][291][8] European fascist movements typically espouse a racist conception of non-Europeans being inferior to Europeans.[292] Beyond this, European fascists have not held a unified set of racial views.[292] Historically, most fascists promoted imperialism, although there have been several fascist movements that were uninterested in the pursuit of new imperial ambitions.[292] For example, Nazism and Italian Fascism were expansionist and irredentist.[293][294] Falangism in Spain envisioned the worldwide unification of Spanish-speaking peoples (Hispanidad).[295] British Fascism was non-interventionist, though it did embrace the British Empire.[296]

Totalitarianism

[edit]

Fascism promotes the establishment of a totalitarian state.[12] It opposes liberal democracy, rejects multi-party systems, and may support a one-party state so that it may synthesize with the nation.[13] Mussolini's The Doctrine of Fascism (1932), partly ghostwritten by philosopher Giovanni Gentile,[297] who Mussolini described as "the philosopher of Fascism", states: "The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State—a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values—interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people."[298] In The Concept of the Political, Nazi political theorist Carl Schmitt argued against liberal and parliamentarian democracy as being obstacles to the execution of state power.[299] In The Legal Basis of the Total State, Schmitt further described the Nazi intention to form a "strong state which guarantees a totality of political unity transcending all diversity" in order to avoid a "disastrous pluralism tearing the German people apart."[300]

Fascist states pursued policies of social indoctrination through propaganda in education and the media, and regulation of the production of educational and media materials.[301] Education was designed to glorify the fascist movement and inform students of its historical and political importance to the nation. It attempted to purge ideas that were not consistent with the beliefs of the fascist movement and to teach students to be obedient to the state.[302]

Economy

[edit]

Historians and other scholars disagree on the question of whether a specifically fascist type of economic policy can be said to exist. David Baker argues that there is an identifiable economic system in fascism that is distinct from those advocated by other ideologies, comprising essential characteristics that fascist nations shared.[303] Payne, Paxton, Sternhell et al. argue that while fascist economies share some similarities, there is no distinctive form of fascist economic organization.[304][305][306] Gerald Feldman and Timothy Mason argue that fascism is distinguished by an absence of coherent economic ideology and a lack of serious economic thinking. They state that the decisions taken by fascist leaders cannot be explained within a logical economic framework.[307]

Fascists presented their views as an alternative to both international socialism and free-market economics.[308] While fascism opposed mainstream socialism, fascists sometimes regarded their movement as a type of nationalist "socialism" to highlight their commitment to nationalism, describing it as national solidarity and unity.[309][310] Fascism had a complex relationship with capitalism, both supporting and opposing different aspects of it at different times and in different countries. In general, fascists held an instrumental view of capitalism, regarding it as a tool that may be useful or not, depending on circumstances.[311][312] Fascist governments typically established close connections between big business and the state, and business was expected to serve the interests of the government.[311][312] Economic self-sufficiency, known as autarky, was a major goal of most fascist governments.[313]

Fascist governments advocated for the resolution of domestic class conflict within a nation in order to guarantee national unity.[314] This would be done through the state's mediating relations between the classes (contrary to the views of classical liberal–inspired capitalists).[315] While fascism was opposed to domestic class conflict, it held that bourgeoisproletarian conflict existed primarily in international conflict between proletarian nations and bourgeois nations.[316] Fascism condemned what it viewed as widespread character traits that it associated with the typical bourgeois mentality that it opposed, such as materialism, crassness, cowardice, and the inability to comprehend the heroic ideal of the fascist "warrior"; and associations with liberalism, individualism, and parliamentarianism.[317] From 1914, Enrico Corradini developed the idea of "proletarian nations", defining proletarian as being one and the same with producers, a productivist perspective that associated all people deemed productive, including entrepreneurs, technicians, workers and soldiers as being proletarian.[318][319][320] Mussolini adopted this view in his description of the proletarian character.[citation needed]

The need for a people's car (Volkswagen in German), its concept and its functional objectives were formulated by Adolf Hitler.[321]

Because productivism was key to creating a strong nationalist state, it criticized internationalist and Marxist socialism, advocating instead to represent a type of nationalist productivist socialism.[322] Nevertheless, while condemning parasitical capitalism, it was willing to accommodate productivist capitalism within it so long as it supported the nationalist objective.[323] The role of productivism was derived from Henri de Saint Simon, whose ideas inspired the creation of utopian socialism and influenced other ideologies that stressed solidarity rather than class war and whose conception of productive people in the economy included both productive workers and productive bosses to challenge the influence of the aristocracy and unproductive financial speculators.[324] Saint Simon's vision combined the traditionalist right-wing criticisms of the French Revolution with a left-wing belief in the need for association or collaboration of productive people in society.[324] Whereas Marxism condemned capitalism as a system of exploitative property relations, fascism saw the nature of the control of credit and money in the contemporary capitalist system as abusive.[323]

Unlike Marxism, fascism did not see class conflict between the Marxist-defined proletariat and the bourgeoisie as a given or as an engine of historical materialism.[323] Instead, it viewed workers and productive capitalists in common as productive people who were in conflict with parasitic elements in society, including corrupt political parties, corrupt financial capital, and feeble people.[323] Fascist leaders such as Mussolini and Hitler spoke of the need to create a new managerial elite led by engineers and captains of industry—but free from the parasitic leadership of industries.[323] Hitler stated that the Nazi Party supported bodenständigen Kapitalismus ("productive capitalism") that was based upon profit earned from one's own labour, but condemned unproductive capitalism or loan capitalism, which derived profit from speculation.[325]

Fascist economics supported a state-controlled economy that accepted a mix of private and public ownership over the means of production.[326] Economic planning was applied to both the public and private sectors, and the prosperity of private enterprise depended on its acceptance of synchronizing itself with the economic goals of the state.[207] Fascist economic ideology supported the profit motive but emphasized that industries must uphold the national interest as superior to private profit.[207]

While fascism accepted the importance of material wealth and power, it condemned materialism, which was identified as being present in both communism and capitalism, and criticized materialism for lacking acknowledgment of the role of the spirit.[327] In particular, fascists criticized capitalism, not because of its competitive nature nor support of private property, which fascists supported—but due to its materialism, individualism, alleged bourgeois decadence and alleged indifference to the nation.[328] Fascism denounced Marxism for its advocacy of materialist internationalist class identity, which fascists regarded as an attack upon the emotional and spiritual bonds of the nation and a threat to the achievement of genuine national solidarity.[329]

In discussing the spread of fascism beyond Italy, historian Philip Morgan states:

Since the Depression was a crisis of laissez-faire capitalism and its political counterpart, parliamentary democracy, fascism could pose as the 'third-way' alternative between capitalism and Bolshevism, the model of a new European 'civilization.' As Mussolini typically put it in early 1934, 'from 1929 ... fascism has become a universal phenomenon ... The dominant forces of the 19th century, democracy, socialism, [and] liberalism have been exhausted ... the new political and economic forms of the twentieth-century are fascist'.[330]

Fascists criticized egalitarianism as preserving the weak and instead promoted social Darwinist views and policies.[331][332] They were in principle opposed to the idea of social welfare, arguing that it "encouraged the preservation of the degenerate and the feeble."[333] The Nazi Party condemned the welfare system of the Weimar Republic, as well as private charity and philanthropy, for supporting people whom they regarded as racially inferior and weak and who should have been weeded out in the process of natural selection.[334] Nevertheless, faced with the mass unemployment and poverty of the Great Depression, the Nazis found it necessary to set up charitable institutions to help racially pure Germans in order to maintain popular support while arguing that this represented "racial self-help" and not indiscriminate charity or universal social welfare.[335] Thus, Nazi programs such as the Winter Relief of the German People and the broader National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) were organized as quasi-private institutions, officially relying on private donations from Germans to help others of their race—although in practice those who refused to donate could face severe consequences.[336] Unlike the social welfare institutions of the Weimar Republic and the Christian charities, the NSV distributed assistance on explicitly racial grounds.[336] It provided support only to those who were "racially sound, capable of and willing to work, politically reliable, and willing and able to reproduce." Non-Aryans were excluded, as well as the "work-shy", "asocials" and the "hereditarily ill".[337] Under these conditions, by 1939, over 17 million Germans had obtained assistance from the NSV, and the agency "projected a powerful image of caring and support" for "those who were judged to have got into difficulties through no fault of their own."[337] Yet the organization was "feared and disliked among society's poorest" because it resorted to intrusive questioning and monitoring to judge who was worthy of support.[338]

Direct action

[edit]

Fascism emphasizes direct action, including supporting the legitimacy of political violence, as a core part of its politics.[339] Fascism views violent action as a necessity in politics that fascism identifies as being an "endless struggle";[340] this emphasis on the use of political violence means that most fascist parties have also created their own private militias (e.g. the Nazi Party's Brown shirts and Fascist Italy's Blackshirts).[341] The basis of fascism's support of violent action in politics is connected to social Darwinism.[340] Fascist movements have commonly held social Darwinist views of nations, races, and societies.[342] They say that nations and races must purge themselves of socially and biologically weak or degenerate people while simultaneously promoting the creation of strong people in order to survive in a world defined by perpetual national and racial conflict.[343]

Age and gender roles

[edit]
Members of the Piccole Italiane, an organization for girls within the National Fascist Party in Italy
Members of the League of German Girls, an organization for girls within the Nazi Party in Germany

Fascism emphasizes youth both in a physical sense of age and a spiritual sense as related to virility and commitment to action.[344] The Italian Fascists' political anthem was called Giovinezza ("The Youth").[344] Fascism identifies the physical age period of youth as a critical time for the moral development of people who will affect society.[345] Walter Laqueur argues "[t]he corollaries of the cult of war and physical danger were the cult of brutality, strength, and sexuality ... [fascism is] a true counter-civilization: rejecting the sophisticated rationalist humanism of Old Europe, fascism sets up as its ideal the primitive instincts and primal emotions of the barbarian."[346]

Italian fascism pursued what it called "moral hygiene" of youth, particularly regarding sexuality.[347] Fascist Italy promoted what it considered normal sexual behaviour in youth while denouncing what it considered deviant sexual behaviour.[347] It condemned pornography, most forms of birth control and contraceptive devices (with the exception of the condom), homosexuality and prostitution as deviant sexual behaviour. However, enforcement of laws opposed to such practices was erratic, and authorities often looked the other way.[347] Fascist Italy regarded the promotion of male sexual excitation before puberty as the cause of criminality amongst male youth, declared homosexuality a social disease and pursued an aggressive campaign to reduce prostitution of young women.[347]

Mussolini perceived women's primary role as primarily child bearers, while that of men as warriors, once saying: "War is to man what maternity is to the woman."[348] In an effort to increase birth rates, the Italian Fascist government gave financial incentives to women who raised large families and initiated policies intended to reduce the number of women employed.[349] Italian Fascism called for women to be honoured as "reproducers of the nation", and the Italian Fascist government held ritual ceremonies to celebrate women's role within the Italian nation.[350] In 1934, Mussolini declared that employment of women was a "major aspect of the thorny problem of unemployment" and that for women, working was "incompatible with childbearing"; Mussolini went on to say that the solution to unemployment for men was the "exodus of women from the work force."[351]

The German Nazi government strongly encouraged women to stay at home to bear children and keep house.[352] This policy was reinforced by bestowing the Cross of Honor of the German Mother on women bearing four or more children. The unemployment rate was cut substantially, mostly through arms production and sending women home so that men could take their jobs. Nazi propaganda sometimes promoted premarital and extramarital sexual relations, unwed motherhood and divorce, but at other times the Nazis opposed such behaviour.[353]

The Nazis decriminalized abortion in cases where fetuses had hereditary defects or were of a race the government disapproved of, while the abortion of healthy pure German, Aryan fetuses remained strictly forbidden.[354] For non-Aryans, abortion was often compulsory. Their eugenics program also stemmed from the "progressive biomedical model" of Weimar Germany.[355] In 1935, Nazi Germany expanded the legality of abortion by amending its eugenics law to promote abortion for women with hereditary disorders.[354] The law allowed abortion if a woman gave her permission and the fetus was not yet viable[356][357] and for purposes of so-called racial hygiene.[358][359]

The Nazis said that homosexuality was degenerate, effeminate, perverted, and undermined masculinity because it did not produce children.[360] They considered homosexuality curable through therapy, citing modern scientism and the study of sexology. Open homosexuals were interned in Nazi concentration camps.[361]

Palingenesis and modernism

[edit]

Fascism emphasizes both palingenesis (national rebirth or re-creation) and modernism.[362] In particular, fascism's nationalism has been identified as having a palingenetic character.[363] Fascism promotes the nation's regeneration and purging it of decadence.[362] Fascism accepts forms of modernism that it deems promote national regeneration while rejecting forms of modernism regarded as antithetical to national regeneration.[364] Fascism aestheticized modern technology and its association with speed, power, and violence.[365] Fascism admired advances in the economy in the early 20th century, particularly Fordism and scientific management.[366] Fascist modernism has been recognized as inspired or developed by various figures—such as Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, Ernst Jünger, Gottfried Benn, Louis-Ferdinand Céline, Knut Hamsun, Ezra Pound and Wyndham Lewis.[367]

In Italy, such modernist influence was exemplified by Marinetti, who advocated a palingenetic modernist society that condemned liberal-bourgeois values of tradition and psychology while promoting a technological-martial religion of national renewal that emphasized militant nationalism.[368] In Germany, it was exemplified by Jünger who was influenced by his observation of the technological warfare during World War I and claimed that a new social class had been created that he described as the "warrior-worker";[369] Like Marinetti, Jünger emphasized the revolutionary capacities of technology. He emphasized an "organic construction" between humans and machines as a liberating and regenerative force that challenged liberal democracy, conceptions of individual autonomy, bourgeois nihilism, and decadence.[369] He conceived of a society based on a totalitarian concept of "total mobilization" of such disciplined warrior-workers.[369]

Culture

[edit]

Aesthetics

[edit]
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti

In The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (1935), Walter Benjamin identifies aestheticization of politics as a key ingredient in fascist regimes.[370] On this point he quotes Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, founder of the Futurist art movement and co-author of the Fascist Manifesto (1919), who aestheticizes war in his writings and claims "war is beautiful."[371]

In Simulacra and Simulation (1981), Jean Baudrillard interprets fascism as a "political aesthetic of death" and a vehement countermovement against the increasing rationalism, secularism, and pacifism of the modern Western world.[372]

The standard definition of fascism, given by Stanley G. Payne, focuses on three concepts, one of which is a "fascist style" with an aesthetic structure of meetings, symbols, and political liturgy, stressing emotional and mystical aspects.[34]

Emilio Gentile argues that fascism expresses itself aesthetically more than theoretically by means of a new political style with myths, rites, and symbols as a lay religion designed to acculturate, socialize, and integrate the faith of the masses with the goal of creating a "new man".[373]

Cultural critic Susan Sontag writes:

Fascist aesthetics ... flow from (and justify) a preoccupation with situations of control, submissive behavior, extravagant effort, and the endurance of pain; they endorse two seemingly opposite states, egomania and servitude. The relations of domination and enslavement take the form of a characteristic pageantry: the massing of groups of people; the turning of people into things; the multiplication or replication of things; and the grouping of people/things around an all-powerful, hypnotic leader-figure or force. The fascist dramaturgy centers on the orgiastic transactions between mighty forces and their puppets, uniformly garbed and shown in ever swelling numbers. Its choreography alternates between ceaseless motion and a congealed, static, 'virile' posing. Fascist art glorifies surrender, it exalts mindlessness, it glamorizes death.[374]

Sontag also enumerates some commonalities between fascist art and the official art of communist countries, such as the obeisance of the masses to the hero, and a preference for the monumental and the "grandiose and rigid" choreography of mass bodies. But whereas official communist art "aims to expound and reinforce a utopian morality", the art of fascist countries such as Nazi Germany "displays a utopian aesthetics – that of physical perfection", in a way that is "both prurient and idealizing".[374]

According to Sontag, fascist aesthetics "is based on the containment of vital forces; movements are confined, held tight, held in." Its appeal is not necessarily limited to those who share the fascist political ideology because fascism "stands for an ideal or rather ideals that are persistent today under the other banners: the ideal of life as art, the cult of beauty, the fetishism of courage, the dissolution of alienation in ecstatic feelings of community; the repudiation of the intellect; the family of man (under the parenthood of leaders)."[374]

[edit]
Joseph Goebbels with film director Leni Riefenstahl in 1937

In Italy, the Mussolini regime created the Direzione Generale per la Cinematografi to encourage film studios to glorify fascism.[375] Italian cinema flourished because the regime stopped the import of Hollywood films in 1938, subsidized domestic production, and kept ticket prices low. It encouraged international distribution to glorify its African empire and to oppose the accusation that Italy was backward.[376] The regime censored criticism and used the state-run Luce Institute film company to laud the Duce through newsreels, documentaries, and photographs.[377] The regime promoted Italian opera and theatre as well, making sure that political enemies did not have a voice on stage.[378]

In Nazi Germany the new Reich Chamber of Culture was under the control of Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's powerful Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.[379] The goal was to stimulate the Aryanization of German culture and to prohibit postmodern trends such as surrealism and cubism.[380][381]

Criticism

[edit]

Fascist parties were closely contested by anti-fascist movements from the political centre and left wing throughout the Interwar period. The defeat of the Axis powers in World War II and subsequent revelation of the crimes against humanity committed during the Holocaust by Germany have led to an almost universal condemnation of both past and present forms of fascism in the modern era. "Fascism" is today used across the political spectrum as a pejorative or byword for perceived authoritarianism and other forms of political evil.

Anti-democratic and tyrannical

[edit]
Hitler and Spanish dictator Francisco Franco in the Meeting at Hendaye, on 23 October 1940[382][383]

One of the most common and strongest criticisms of fascism is that it is a tyranny.[384] Fascism is deliberately and entirely non-democratic and anti-democratic.[385]

Fascism's extreme authoritarianism and nationalism often manifest as a belief in racial purity or a master race, usually blended with some variant of racism or discrimination against a demonized "Other", such as Jews, homosexuals, transgender people, ethnic minorities, or immigrants.[386][387] These ideas have motivated fascist regimes to commit massacres, forced sterilizations, deportations, and genocides.[17] During World War II, the genocidal and imperialist ambitions of the fascist Axis powers resulted in the murder of millions of people.[388][389] Federico Finchelstein wrote that fascism

...encompassed totalitarianism, state terrorism, imperialism, racism and, in the German case, the most radical genocide of the last century: the Holocaust. Fascism, in its many forms, did not hesitate to kill its own citizens as well as its colonial subjects in its search for ideological and political closure. Millions of civilians perished on a global scale during the apogee of fascist ideologies in Europe and beyond.[389]

Unprincipled opportunism

[edit]

Some critics of Italian fascism have said that much of the ideology was merely a by-product of unprincipled opportunism by Mussolini and that he changed his political stances merely to bolster his personal ambitions while he disguised them as being purposeful to the public.[390] Richard Washburn Child, the American ambassador to Italy who worked with Mussolini and became his friend and admirer, defended Mussolini's opportunistic behaviour by writing:

Opportunist is a term of reproach used to brand men who fit themselves to conditions for the reasons of self-interest. Mussolini, as I have learned to know him, is an opportunist in the sense that he believed that mankind itself must be fitted to changing conditions rather than to fixed theories, no matter how many hopes and prayers have been expended on theories and programmes.[391]

Child quoted Mussolini as saying: "The sanctity of an ism is not in the ism; it has no sanctity beyond its power to do, to work, to succeed in practice. It may have succeeded yesterday and fail to-morrow. Failed yesterday and succeed to-morrow. The machine, first of all, must run!"[392]

Some have criticized Mussolini's actions during the outbreak of World War I as opportunistic for seeming to suddenly abandon Marxist egalitarian internationalism for non-egalitarian nationalism and note, to that effect, that upon Mussolini endorsing Italy's intervention in the war against Germany and Austria-Hungary, he and the new fascist movement received financial support from Italian and foreign sources, such as Ansaldo (an armaments firm) and other companies[393] as well as the British Security Service MI5.[394] Some, including Mussolini's socialist opponents at the time, have noted that regardless of the financial support he accepted for his pro-interventionist stance, Mussolini was free to write whatever he wished in his newspaper Il Popolo d'Italia without prior sanctioning from his financial backers.[395] Furthermore, the major source of financial support that Mussolini and the fascist movement received in World War I was from France and is widely believed to have been French socialists who supported the French government's war against Germany and who sent support to Italian socialists who wanted Italian intervention on France's side.[396]

Mussolini’s transformation away from Marxism into what eventually became fascism began prior to World War I, as Mussolini had grown increasingly pessimistic about Marxism and egalitarianism while becoming increasingly supportive of figures who opposed egalitarianism, such as Friedrich Nietzsche.[397] By 1902, Mussolini was studying Georges Sorel, Nietzsche and Vilfredo Pareto.[398] Sorel's emphasis on the need for overthrowing decadent liberal democracy and capitalism by the use of violence, direct action, general strikes and neo-Machiavellian appeals to emotion impressed Mussolini deeply.[399] Mussolini's use of Nietzsche made him a highly unorthodox socialist, due to Nietzsche's promotion of elitism and anti-egalitarian views.[397] Prior to World War I, Mussolini's writings over time indicated that he had abandoned the Marxism and egalitarianism that he had previously supported in favour of Nietzsche's übermensch concept and anti-egalitarianism.[397] In 1908, Mussolini wrote a short essay called "Philosophy of Strength" based on his Nietzschean influence, in which Mussolini openly spoke fondly of the ramifications of an impending war in Europe in challenging both religion and nihilism: "[A] new kind of free spirit will come, strengthened by the war, ... a spirit equipped with a kind of sublime perversity, ... a new free spirit will triumph over God and over Nothing."[128]

Ideological dishonesty

[edit]

Fascism has been criticized for being ideologically dishonest. Major examples of ideological dishonesty have been identified in Italian fascism's changing relationship with German Nazism.[400] Fascist Italy's official foreign policy positions commonly used rhetorical ideological hyperbole to justify its actions, although during Dino Grandi's tenure as Italy's foreign minister the country engaged in realpolitik free of such fascist hyperbole.[401] Italian fascism's stance towards German Nazism fluctuated from support from the late 1920s to 1934, when it celebrated Hitler's rise to power and Mussolini's first meeting with Hitler in 1934; to opposition from 1934 to 1936 after the assassination of Italy's allied leader in Austria, Engelbert Dollfuss, by Austrian Nazis; and again back to support after 1936, when Germany was the only significant power that did not denounce Italy's invasion and occupation of Ethiopia.[402]

After antagonism exploded between Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy over the assassination of Austrian Chancellor Dollfuss in 1934, Mussolini and Italian fascists denounced and ridiculed Nazism's racial theories, particularly by denouncing its Nordicism, while promoting Mediterraneanism.[403] Mussolini himself responded to Nordicists' claims of Italy being divided into Nordic and Mediterranean racial areas due to Germanic invasions of Northern Italy by claiming that while Germanic tribes such as the Lombards took control of Italy after the fall of Ancient Rome, they arrived in small numbers (about 8,000) and quickly assimilated into Roman culture and spoke the Latin language within fifty years.[404] Italian fascism was influenced by the tradition of Italian nationalists scornfully looking down upon Nordicists' claims and taking pride in comparing the age and sophistication of ancient Roman civilization as well as the classical revival in the Renaissance to that of Nordic societies that Italian nationalists described as "newcomers" to civilization in comparison.[405] At the height of antagonism between the Nazis and Italian fascists over race, Mussolini claimed that the Germans themselves were not a pure race and noted with irony that the Nazi theory of German racial superiority was based on the theories of non-German foreigners, such as Frenchman Arthur de Gobineau.[406] After the tension in German-Italian relations diminished during the late 1930s, Italian fascism sought to harmonize its ideology with German Nazism and combined Nordicist and Mediterranean racial theories, noting that Italians were members of the Aryan Race, composed of a mixed Nordic-Mediterranean subtype.[403]

In 1938, Mussolini declared upon Italy's adoption of antisemitic laws that Italian fascism had always been antisemitic.[403] However, Italian fascism did not endorse antisemitism until the late 1930s when Mussolini feared alienating antisemitic Nazi Germany, whose power and influence were growing in Europe.[407] Prior to that period, there had been notable Jewish Italians who had been senior Italian fascist officials, including Margherita Sarfatti, who had also been Mussolini's mistress.[403] Also contrary to Mussolini's claim in 1938, only a small number of Italian fascists were staunchly antisemitic (such as Roberto Farinacci and Giuseppe Preziosi), while others such as Italo Balbo, who came from Ferrara which had one of Italy's largest Jewish communities, were disgusted by the antisemitic laws and opposed them.[403] Fascism scholar Mark Neocleous notes that while Italian fascism did not have a clear commitment to antisemitism, there were occasional antisemitic statements issued prior to 1938, such as Mussolini in 1919 declaring that the Jewish bankers in London and New York were connected by race to the Russian Bolsheviks and that eight percent of the Russian Bolsheviks were Jews.[408]

Anti-fascism

[edit]
Italian partisans in Milan during the final insurrection leading to the liberation of Italy in April 1945
Anti-fascist demonstration at Porta San Paolo in Rome on the occasion of Italy's Liberation Day on 25 April 2013

Anti-fascism is a political movement in opposition to fascist ideologies, groups and individuals. Beginning in European countries in the 1920s, it was at its most significant shortly before and during World War II. During the war, the Axis powers were opposed by many countries forming the Allies, and by dozens of resistance movements worldwide.[409] Anti-fascism has been an element of movements across the political spectrum and holding many different political positions such as anarchism, communism, pacifism, republicanism, social democracy, socialism and syndicalism as well as centrist, conservative, liberal and nationalist viewpoints.[410]

Organization against fascism began around 1920. Fascism became the state ideology of Italy in 1922 and of Germany in 1933, spurring a large increase in anti-fascist action, including German resistance to Nazism and the Italian resistance movement. Anti-fascism was a major aspect of the Spanish Civil War, which foreshadowed World War II.[411]

Before World War II, the West had not taken seriously the threat of fascism, and anti-fascism was sometimes associated with communism.[412] However, the outbreak of World War II greatly changed Western perceptions, and fascism was seen as an existential threat by not only the communist Soviet Union but also by the liberal-democratic United States and United Kingdom.[citation needed] The Axis Powers of World War II were generally fascist, and the fight against them was characterized in anti-fascist terms. Resistance during World War II to fascism occurred in every occupied country, and came from across the ideological spectrum. The defeat of the Axis powers generally ended fascism as a state ideology.[413]

After World War II, the anti-fascist movement continued to be active in places where organized fascism continued or re-emerged.[414] Modern antifa politics in the United States and Britain can be traced to opposition to the infiltration of the American and British punk scenes by white power skinheads in the 1970s and 1980s.[415] From the late 1980s, the squatter scene and autonomism movement in West Germany were important in an upswing of antifa in Germany.[416] There was a further increase in antifascism following the increase in neo-Nazism in Germany after the fall of the Berlin Wall.[415] In the 21st century, this greatly increased in prominence as a response to the resurgence of the radical right, especially after the 2016 election of Donald Trump.[415][417]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Fascism was a revolutionary political movement and ultranationalist ideology founded by Benito Mussolini in Milan on March 23, 1919, through the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, which rejected parliamentary liberalism, Marxist socialism, and democratic individualism in favor of a totalitarian state embodying the nation's spiritual essence and collective will to power. The movement seized control via the March on Rome in October 1922, where approximately 25,000 Blackshirts converged on the capital, prompting King Victor Emmanuel III to appoint Mussolini prime minister amid fears of civil unrest, thereby establishing the first fascist regime. By 1925, Mussolini consolidated dictatorial authority, declaring the Fascist State absolute and all-encompassing, where "individuals and groups relative to the State" were subordinated to its ethical and volitional imperatives. Central to fascism's doctrine, as articulated by Mussolini and philosopher Giovanni Gentile, was the rejection of historic materialism and class conflict, positing instead that life demands perpetual struggle, sacrifice, and heroism under hierarchical authority, with the state as the "immanent conscience of the nation" fostering unity through tradition, discipline, and expansionist imperialism. Unlike socialism's emphasis on economic equality or liberalism's individualism, fascism promoted corporatism, organizing society into state-supervised syndicates representing producers to harmonize interests for national strength, opposing both internationalism and laissez-faire markets. In practice, the regime suppressed opposition through squadristi violence and secret police, curtailed press freedom, and cultivated a cult of personality around Mussolini as Il Duce, while pursuing autarky and militarization that initially stabilized post-World War I chaos but later exacerbated economic strains during the Great Depression. Fascism's defining achievements included infrastructure projects like marsh drainage and railway electrification, which contributed to modest industrial growth; unemployment was reduced in the early 1920s (1922–1925) through Finance Minister Alberto De Stefani's liberal policies, including spending cuts, tax reductions, and economic liberalization, alongside wage policies favoring skilled labor, with large-scale public works implemented primarily in the 1930s in response to the Great Depression, alongside social initiatives promoting population growth and youth indoctrination through organizations like the Balilla. Controversies encompassed systematic human rights violations, including the murder of socialist deputy Giacomo Matteotti in 1924 and the 1938 racial laws adopting anti-Semitic measures under Nazi influence—though Italian fascism initially lacked Nazism's biological racism, prioritizing cultural nationalism over Aryan supremacy. The ideology's aggressive foreign policy, from the 1935 invasion of Ethiopia to the 1939 Pact of Steel with Germany, entangled Italy in World War II, leading to military defeats, Allied invasion, and Mussolini's ouster in 1943, after which he headed the puppet Italian Social Republic until his execution in 1945. While scholarly consensus, often shaped by post-war liberal academia, frames fascism primarily as a reactionary totalitarianism, primary articulations reveal its self-conception as a modernist synthesis combating decadence through action and state transcendence.

Definition and Core Concepts

Etymology and Terminology

The term fascism derives from the Italian fascismo (and cognate French fascisme, commonly pronounced /fa.ʃism/ ≈ "fah-sheesm" with the "sc" producing a /ʃ/ sound as in "she," and less commonly /fa.sism/ ≈ "fah-sism"), which traces its roots to the Latin fasces, denoting a bundle of wooden rods often bound around an axe head, carried by lictors as a symbol of magisterial authority and unified strength in ancient Rome. This emblem represented the idea that individual sticks, when bundled, gain collective power, a metaphor Mussolini later invoked to signify national unity under a strong leader. In pre-fascist Italian usage, fascio referred generically to a political league or group, as seen in earlier socialist fasci organizations, but Mussolini repurposed it for his movement. Benito Mussolini formally adopted the term and symbol in 1919 when founding the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento on March 23 in Milan, drawing explicitly on Roman republican and imperial imagery to legitimize his paramilitary squads as restorers of Italy's ancient grandeur. By November 1921, this evolved into the Partito Nazionale Fascista, with the fasces becoming the party's official emblem, emblazoned on uniforms, architecture, and propaganda to evoke disciplined hierarchy and state power. Mussolini himself emphasized the fasces' dual meaning of strength through unity and readiness for coercion, as the protruding axe implied both binding and execution. Historically, "fascism" denoted the specific ideology and regime of Mussolini's Italy from 1922 to 1943, characterized by one-party rule, suppression of opposition, and corporatist economics, rather than a generic label for authoritarianism. Post-World War II, the term broadened in scholarly and popular discourse to encompass analogous movements, such as Nazism, though this genericization has sparked debate over dilution of its original Italian context, with some historians reserving lowercase "fascism" for doctrinal generics and uppercase "Fascism" for Mussolini's variant. Contemporary usages often apply it pejoratively to diverse right-wing populisms, reflecting ideological contestation rather than strict etymological fidelity, as evidenced by its invocation in interwar Europe for imitation movements in countries like Romania and Spain but rarely beyond ultranationalist contexts.

Scholarly Definitions and Debates

Scholars have long struggled to define fascism precisely due to its syncretic and opportunistic character, blending revolutionary nationalism, authoritarianism, and anti-liberal elements without a rigid doctrinal canon akin to Marxism. One influential framework, proposed by Roger Griffin, conceptualizes fascism as a genus of political ideology centered on "palingenetic ultranationalism," wherein a mythic core of national rebirth (palingenesis) fuses with populist ultra-nationalism to mobilize mass support against perceived decadence and enemies. This ideal-type approach emphasizes fascism's revolutionary drive for organic national renewal, distinguishing it from mere conservatism or authoritarianism, though critics argue it risks overgeneralization by applying the label to diverse movements. Emilio Gentile, focusing on Italian Fascism as the archetype, defines it as a modern political religion aspiring to totalitarianism, where the nation-state is sacralized, and all societal spheres are subordinated to a totalitarian ethic of perpetual mobilization and ethical transformation. Gentile's emphasis on fascism's totalitarian praxis—evident in Mussolini's regime from 1925 onward, with the abolition of internal party factions and the creation of a single-party state—highlights its rejection of pluralism in favor of a holistic, myth-driven governance. In contrast, Umberto Eco's "Ur-Fascism" outlines 14 fuzzy traits, including a cult of tradition, irrationalism, rejection of modernism, action for action's sake, machismo, selective populism, and Newspeak, portraying fascism as a syncretic, eternal potential rather than a fixed ideology, rooted in frustration and fear of difference. Eco's list, drawn from his experiences under Mussolini, underscores fascism's appeal to the middle class via elitist hierarchies and anti-intellectualism, but its vagueness invites debate over whether it captures essence or merely symptoms. Debates persist on fascism's ideological placement, with many historians positioning it as a revolutionary "third way" between liberal capitalism and Marxist socialism, as articulated in Mussolini's 1932 Doctrine of Fascism, which rejected both materialism and class conflict for corporatist national syndicates integrating labor and capital under state direction. This economic stance, implemented via the 1927 Charter of Labor establishing 22 corporations, aimed at productivist harmony rather than laissez-faire or collectivization, reflecting fascism's roots in syndicalism and opposition to both Bolshevik internationalism and bourgeois individualism. Critics in academia, often influenced by post-war antifascist narratives, equate fascism exclusively with right-wing extremism, overlooking its leftist origins—Mussolini's evolution from socialist editor of Avanti! in 1914—and its anti-capitalist rhetoric, which some attribute to a systemic bias favoring leftist framings of history. For instance, functionalist scholars like Robert Paxton initially stressed fascism's adaptability over ideology, but pivoted in 2021 after the U.S. Capitol attack to apply the fascist label to Donald Trump, reaffirming this in an October 2024 New York Times interview stating "It's the real thing," while arguing for empirical alignment with interwar mobilizations rather than mere rhetorical analogies. Further contention surrounds fascism's totalitarianism versus pragmatism: while Griffin and Gentile see an ideological core driving toward totality, others, examining archival evidence from the March on Rome in 1922 and subsequent policies, portray it as a hybrid responding to Italy's post-World War I crisis—unemployment at 11% in 1921, strikes numbering 1,663—rather than a premeditated blueprint. Debates also question generic fascism's applicability beyond Italy and Germany, with some rejecting extensions to movements lacking palingenetic myths or mass parties, amid concerns that vague definitions enable politicized misuse, as seen in partisan labeling during electoral cycles. Empirical studies prioritize verifiable traits like leader cult, suppression of opposition (e.g., Matteotti's murder in 1924), and militarized aesthetics over ideological purity, underscoring fascism's causal reliance on crisis-fueled nationalism rather than abstract theory.

Fascist Self-Understanding

Fascists conceived of their ideology as a comprehensive, revolutionary doctrine that integrated politics, economics, ethics, and spirituality into a unified system aimed at national rebirth and overcoming the perceived weaknesses of both liberal individualism and Marxist class struggle. In the foundational text The Doctrine of Fascism (1932), co-authored by Benito Mussolini and philosopher Giovanni Gentile, fascism is presented not merely as a political method but as a "total conception of life," totalitarian in scope yet distinct from mere state omnipotence, emphasizing the state's role as the embodiment of the nation's ethical and spiritual will. Mussolini asserted that "the Fascist conception of life is a religious one, in which man is viewed in his immanent relation to a higher law, endowed with an objective will transcending the individual and raising him to conscious membership of a spiritual society." This worldview rejected egalitarianism and materialism, positing hierarchy and struggle as natural and invigorating forces essential for human elevation and societal vigor. Central to fascist self-understanding was the primacy of the state over the individual, where personal liberty existed only insofar as it served collective national interests, countering what they viewed as the atomizing effects of liberalism and the divisive internationalism of socialism. Mussolini described fascism as anti-individualistic, affirming "the value of the individual only insofar as his interests coincide with those of the state," and as a rejection of democratic pluralism in favor of authoritative unity under a single leader embodying the popular will. The movement positioned itself as a "third way," transcending capitalism's economic laissez-faire and communism's class warfare through corporatism, where economic sectors were organized into state-supervised syndicates to harmonize labor and capital under national directives, ostensibly eliminating strikes and promoting productivity for imperial expansion. Fascists emphasized action (fascismo deriving from the Latin fasces, symbolizing bundled strength) over intellectual abstraction, with Mussolini declaring fascism as "action in which doctrine is imminent... thought which is action." Fascist anthropology portrayed the ideal adherent as disciplined, heroic, and oriented toward duty, conquest, and sacrifice, despising pacifism and viewing war as a "hygiene of the people" that tested and purified national character. "The Fascist accepts and loves life; he rejects and despises suicide as cowardly. Life as he understands it means duty, elevation, conquest; life must be lofty and full, it must be a high adventure," Mussolini wrote, framing existence as perpetual struggle against decadence and mediocrity. This ethos extended to a cult of youth, virility, and empire-building, inspired by Roman precedents, with fascism claiming to restore organic national communities disrupted by modernity's alienating forces. While Italian fascism served as the archetype, derivative movements elsewhere echoed this self-image of regenerative authoritarianism, though Mussolini warned against superficial imitations lacking genuine totalitarian commitment.

Ideological Foundations

Philosophical and Intellectual Origins

The philosophical underpinnings of fascism emerged primarily from Italian actual idealism and revisionist syndicalism, synthesizing anti-materialist metaphysics with a voluntarist emphasis on action and collective will. Giovanni Gentile, the leading exponent of actualism, argued in works like The Theory of Mind as Pure Act (1916) that reality is not static but enacted through spiritual activity, culminating in the ethical state as the synthesis of individual and universal. As fascism's chief intellectual architect and co-author with Benito Mussolini of the 1932 Doctrine of Fascism, Gentile framed the fascist state as a totalitarian organism where personal liberty inheres solely in service to the national whole, rejecting both liberal atomism and Marxist class conflict in favor of hierarchical unity under the leader's directive thought. This Hegelian-inflected idealism elevated the state to a quasi-divine entity, with fascism posited as its practical realization through perpetual ethical mobilization rather than contemplative philosophy. Georges Sorel's influence stemmed from his critique of rationalist progressivism and advocacy for mythopoetic violence as a catalyst for renewal, detailed in Reflections on Violence (1908). Sorel, initially a Marxist, evolved toward syndicalist irrationalism, positing that mobilizing myths—like the general strike for socialists or national resurgence for fascists—could transcend decadent bourgeois rationality and forge proletarian or heroic morality through direct confrontation. Mussolini, who reviewed Sorel's work approvingly in 1909 and later credited him as a primary intellectual debt, adapted these ideas to rationalize fascist paramilitary tactics and the myth of Roman imperial revival, viewing violence not as mere destruction but as creative ethical force against egalitarian inertia. Sorel's anti-parliamentarian elitism and disdain for intellectual abstraction thus bridged socialist revisionism with fascism's cult of action, though Sorel himself critiqued Mussolini's authoritarian drift in his later years. Friedrich Nietzsche's concepts of will to power, master morality, and opposition to herd egalitarianism were invoked by fascist ideologues to justify anti-democratic hierarchy and cultural vitalism, despite Nietzsche's explicit rejection of nationalism and statism. Mussolini cited Nietzsche in 1908 as formative alongside Sorel, drawing on notions of the Übermensch and eternal recurrence to exalt the Duce as creative legislator and combat "slave morality" in liberal and socialist thought. Italian fascists, including Gentile, selectively integrated Nietzschean anti-nihilism into actualism, portraying fascism as a Dionysian overcoming of modern decay, though scholars note this entailed distortion—Nietzsche favored aristocratic individualism over mass mobilization or state absolutism. Hegel's dialectical state theory provided a further indirect root via Gentile's neo-Hegelianism, interpreting history as spirit's self-realization in the organic polity, but fascism inverted this toward anti-dialectical flux and leader-centric myth, prioritizing immanent action over rational synthesis. These strands converged in fascism's rejection of Enlightenment universalism, privileging instead national spirit, intuitive will, and ethical totalism as bulwarks against perceived civilizational entropy.

Core Principles and Doctrines

Fascism's foundational doctrines emphasize the absolute primacy of the state as an organic, spiritual entity embodying the nation's collective will. In Benito Mussolini's 1932 essay "The Doctrine of Fascism," co-authored with philosopher Giovanni Gentile, the state is conceived as totalitarian, meaning "everything within the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State." This principle rejects any autonomy for individuals, classes, or institutions outside state control, positioning fascism as a rejection of both liberal individualism and Marxist class conflict in favor of national unity under hierarchical authority. Central to fascist doctrine is ultranationalism, which views the nation as a mystical organism requiring rebirth through struggle and sacrifice. Mussolini described fascism as arising from a "spiritual process" that combats democratic egalitarianism and materialistic internationalism, prioritizing the nation's historical destiny over universal rights or economic determinism. The leader, or Duce, serves as the state's incarnate will, directing society toward expansion and self-sufficiency, with militarism glorified as essential for national vigor. This authoritarian structure suppresses opposition through force, viewing violence not as a regrettable means but as a purifying force aligned with life's Darwinian realities. Fascism doctrinally opposes both capitalism's atomizing individualism and socialism's class warfare, advocating instead a "third way" where economic activity serves national goals under state mediation—though detailed economic tenets are elaborated separately. It embraces anti-rationalism and pragmatism, dismissing abstract ideologies in favor of action, myth, and heroic ethos; Mussolini asserted that "fascism believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace," seeing conflict as generative of progress. While Italian fascism under Mussolini initially de-emphasized biological racism—focusing on cultural and imperial superiority—doctrinal flexibility allowed later adaptations, such as the 1938 Manifesto of Race, influenced by alliance with Nazi Germany. Scholarly analyses, often from post-war perspectives, highlight these principles' adaptability but note that primary fascist texts prioritize statism and nationalism over rigid racial dogma.

Economic Ideology: Corporatism and the Third Way

Fascist economic ideology positioned itself as a "third way" distinct from both liberal capitalism, which it criticized for promoting individualistic profit-seeking and economic anarchy, and Marxist socialism, which it condemned for advocating class warfare and the abolition of private property. Instead, fascism sought to harmonize class interests under state authority to serve national goals, emphasizing collective production for the nation's strength rather than individual or proletarian ends. This approach maintained private ownership of the means of production while subordinating it to state directives, rejecting free-market competition in favor of planned coordination aimed at autarky and military preparedness. Central to this ideology was corporatism, a system organizing the economy into mandatory "corporations" representing entire sectors of production, each comprising syndicates of workers, employers, and technical experts under state oversight to resolve disputes and set production norms. The Fascist State claimed sovereignty over economic life, intervening to align private enterprise with public needs, as articulated in Mussolini's assertion that "the Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in any other." The 1926 syndical laws outlawed independent unions, establishing state-recognized syndicates, while the 1927 Charter of Labor (Carta del Lavoro) formalized the framework, declaring production a "social function" subject to state regulation, guaranteeing private property only insofar as it advanced national interests, and mandating collective contracts negotiated within corporations. By 1934, 22 corporations were instituted, covering agriculture, industry, and services, with the National Council of Corporations advising on policy. In practice, corporatism facilitated heavy state intervention, including wage and price controls, import restrictions, and public works like the draining of the Pontine Marshes (completed 1935, reclaiming 80,000 hectares for agriculture), but it prioritized autarky—economic self-sufficiency—over efficiency, especially after the 1935 League of Nations sanctions following the invasion of Ethiopia. Policies such as the 1925 Battle for Grain campaign boosted domestic wheat production by 15% within three years through subsidies and land reclamation, reducing imports, yet overall growth stagnated, with industrial output rising modestly (e.g., steel production from 1.5 million tons in 1929 to 2.3 million in 1938) amid inefficiencies from bureaucratic overlap and suppressed competition. While avoiding wholesale nationalization, the regime allied with big business—e.g., via the Istituto per la Ricostruzione Industriale (IRI) founded in 1933, which controlled 20% of industry by 1939—yet directed resources toward rearmament, revealing corporatism's causal orientation toward totalitarian mobilization rather than genuine class reconciliation or prosperity.

Historical Origins

Post-World War I Context in Italy

Italy emerged from World War I in November 1918 as one of the victorious Allied powers, yet its sacrifices—approximately 600,000 military deaths and over 1 million wounded—yielded limited territorial gains under the Treaty of Versailles signed on June 28, 1919. The treaty awarded Italy Trentino-Alto Adige and Istria but denied control over Fiume (modern Rijeka) and the Dalmatian coast, territories promised in the 1915 Treaty of London that had induced Italy's entry into the war against the Central Powers. This outcome fueled nationalist resentment, encapsulated in the phrase "mutilated victory" (vittoria mutilata), coined by poet and war hero Gabriele D'Annunzio in a speech on October 24, 1918, to protest perceived diplomatic betrayal by Allied leaders, particularly U.S. President Woodrow Wilson. Exacerbating the diplomatic frustration, D'Annunzio led a band of about 2,500 armed volunteers in seizing Fiume on September 12, 1919, defying the Italian government and establishing a proto-fascist regime there that lasted until December 1920. Economically, the war left Italy with a national debt that quadrupled to around 85 billion lire by 1919, rampant inflation eroding real wages by up to 50% in industrial sectors, and mass unemployment as over 4 million demobilized soldiers reentered a disrupted labor market. Agricultural production stagnated due to labor shortages and disrupted trade, while urban areas grappled with food shortages and rising prices, conditions that radicalized workers and peasants alike. The period from 1919 to 1920, known as the Biennio Rosso ("Red Biennium"), saw intensified class conflict, with the Italian Socialist Party (PSI) surging in the November 1919 elections to capture 32% of the vote and 156 seats in parliament, reflecting widespread discontent. Mass strikes peaked in September 1920, when roughly 500,000 metalworkers occupied over 500 factories in northern Italy, including major Fiat plants in Turin, demanding worker control and wage increases amid lockouts by industrialists. The occupations, which spread to shipyards and textile mills, represented a direct challenge to capitalist property relations but collapsed without revolutionary success due to PSI leadership's hesitancy and government mediation under Prime Minister Giovanni Giolitti, who avoided military intervention and brokered compromises restoring production. Rural unrest paralleled urban actions, with land seizures by day laborers in regions like Puglia and Emilia-Romagna, though these too subsided by late 1920 as socialist momentum waned. Politically, the liberal constitutional monarchy under King Victor Emmanuel III suffered chronic instability, with five prime ministers rotating between 1919 and 1922: Vittorio Emanuele Orlando (resigned June 1919), Francesco Saverio Nitti (June 1919–June 1920), Giolitti (June 1920–July 1921), Ivanoe Bonomi (July–December 1921), and Luigi Facta (February–October 1922). Coalition governments, hampered by proportional representation introduced in 1919, failed to enact coherent reforms, tolerating squadristi violence against socialists while suppressing nationalist irredentism unevenly, as in the delayed resolution of Fiume via the Treaty of Rapallo in November 1920. This paralysis, amid rising paramilitary clashes between socialist militias and nationalist Arditi veterans, eroded public confidence in parliamentary democracy and created fertile ground for authoritarian alternatives.

Mussolini's Evolution from Socialism

Benito Mussolini, born on July 29, 1883, in Predappio to a socialist father who named him after Mexican revolutionary Benito Juárez, joined the Italian Socialist Party (PSI) in his early twenties after engaging in radical politics in Switzerland and Italy. By 1912, at age 29, he had risen to become editor of Avanti!, the PSI's official newspaper in Milan, where his polemical style advocating revolutionary socialism and antimilitarism boosted its influence among workers. Under his leadership, the paper's daily circulation rose from around 20,000 to over 80,000 copies by mid-1914, establishing Mussolini as the party's most prominent agitator against reformist tendencies and bourgeois liberalism. The July 1914 outbreak of World War I exposed fractures in Mussolini's socialist commitments. While the PSI upheld strict neutrality as a proletarian imperative, Mussolini initially complied but by October argued in Avanti! that Italy's intervention alongside the Allies would shatter the status quo, ignite class revolution, and forge national vitality—views he framed as an extension of Marxist dialectics rather than betrayal. This interventionism, possibly influenced by French subsidies reportedly funneled through pro-war socialists, prompted the PSI directorate to dismiss him from the editorship on October 31, 1914, followed by formal expulsion on November 24 for violating party discipline. Post-expulsion, Mussolini launched the pro-war newspaper Il Popolo d'Italia in December 1914, enlisting in the Italian army in 1915 and sustaining shrapnel wounds in February 1917 that ended his frontline service. The war radicalized him further toward nationalism, as he critiqued socialism's pacifism for stifling Italy's potential and observed Bolshevik Russia's revolution as a model of violent renewal but rejected its internationalism in favor of state-centric struggle. By 1918, amid Italy's "mutilated victory" at Versailles—which denied promised territories like Fiume and Dalmatia—Mussolini had abandoned class warfare for national unity against perceived internal enemies, including socialists whom he accused of undermining postwar stability. On March 23, 1919, in a Milan piazza, Mussolini founded the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, drawing from World War I veterans, futurists, and disaffected radicals to form combat squads opposing both liberal weakness and Bolshevik agitation during the Biennio Rosso (1919–1920), a period of socialist strikes and factory occupations. The fasci's inaugural manifesto blended residual socialist demands—such as land expropriation for peasants, an eight-hour workday, and progressive taxation—with republicanism, irredentism, and rejection of both capitalism and communism, positioning fascism as a "third way" prioritizing the nation's organic totality over proletarian dictatorship. Electoral failure in November 1919, where fasci candidates won zero seats, prompted Mussolini to pivot: he cultivated alliances with industrialists, landowners, and monarchists threatened by socialist gains, deploying squadre d'azione blackshirt militias to dismantle unions and reclaim order through violence. This pragmatic evolution culminated in the November 1921 transformation into the National Fascist Party (PNF), which by then numbered over 250,000 members and explicitly repudiated Mussolini's socialist past, emphasizing hierarchical corporatism, imperial expansion, and totalitarian state control as antidotes to liberal decay and Marxist materialism. Mussolini's shift was driven by empirical postwar realities—Italy's economic turmoil, 500,000 war dead, and socialist electoral surges (PSI seats rose from 52 in 1913 to 156 in 1919)—rather than ideological purity, allowing him to harness anti-left backlash for power consolidation.

Formation of the Fascist Movement

The Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, the organizational precursor to the National Fascist Party, was established by Benito Mussolini on March 23, 1919, during a meeting in Milan's Piazza San Sepolcro attended by roughly 200 individuals, primarily drawn from war veterans, nationalists, futurists, and former socialists disillusioned with the Italian Socialist Party's neutralism and post-war radicalism. The name "fasci" evoked ancient Roman bundles of rods symbolizing strength through unity, while "combattimento" reflected the group's militant orientation, positioning it as a combat league against perceived threats from Bolshevik-inspired unrest and liberal weaknesses in Italy's fragile parliamentary system. Mussolini, having shifted from socialist internationalism to interventionism during World War I and subsequently building a personal following through his newspaper Il Popolo d'Italia, framed the fasci as a syncretic force rejecting both bourgeois conservatism and Marxist collectivism, emphasizing action-oriented nationalism to restore Italy's greatness amid economic chaos, demobilization unemployment affecting over 4 million veterans, and rising socialist strikes that paralyzed industrial output in 1919-1920. Initial recruits included elite Arditi shock troops from the war, known for their aggressive tactics, who provided the fasci with paramilitary muscle for street-level confrontations against socialist militias in cities like Milan and Bologna. The group's founding program, articulated in the April 1919 "Manifesto of the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento" (also known as the San Sepolcro Program), blended interventionist foreign policy demands—such as annexing Dalmatia and Fiume—with domestic reforms including universal suffrage (including for women), an eight-hour workday, workers' representation in management, progressive taxation, abolition of the Senate, and confiscation of church properties and war profits, reflecting Mussolini's tactical populism to attract leftist defectors while prioritizing anti-Bolshevik violence. This eclectic platform, however, prioritized national syndicalism over class warfare, advocating a "third way" that subordinated economic interests to state-directed unity, though it secured negligible support in the November 1919 elections, with no seats won in the proportional representation system. By mid-1920, amid the "red biennium" of factory occupations and land seizures by socialists—peaking with over 500 factories under worker control in September 1920—the fasci expanded into squadre d'azione (action squads), often uniformed in black shirts, which systematically disrupted strikes and assaulted socialist headquarters, gaining rural landowner patronage in the Po Valley where agricultural output had declined 20-30% due to unrest. This violent mobilization, rather than ideological coherence, propelled membership growth from scattered local groups to over 2,000 fasci nuclei by 1921, transforming the movement from a fringe alliance into a proto-party apparatus capable of challenging the liberal state. The formal conversion into the Partito Nazionale Fascista occurred on November 7, 1921, at a congress in Rome, consolidating these elements under Mussolini's centralized leadership.

Major Fascist Regimes

Italian Fascism under Mussolini (1922–1943)

Benito Mussolini, leader of the National Fascist Party, assumed the position of Prime Minister of Italy on October 30, 1922, following the March on Rome, a coordinated demonstration by approximately 30,000 Blackshirts that pressured King Victor Emmanuel III to appoint him amid fears of civil unrest. Initially heading a coalition government that included liberals, nationalists, and populists, Mussolini secured emergency powers through the Italian parliament in December 1922, enabling decree-laws without legislative approval for one year. Mussolini consolidated absolute control between 1923 and 1925 by exploiting electoral reforms and political violence. The Acerbo Law of July 1923 awarded a two-thirds parliamentary majority to any party or coalition receiving at least 25% of votes in national elections, which Fascist-led lists achieved with 65% in the fraud-ridden April 1924 vote amid squadristi intimidation. The murder of socialist deputy Giacomo Matteotti on June 10, 1924, by Fascist operatives triggered the Aventine Secession, where opposition parties withdrew from parliament demanding Mussolini's resignation; however, the king's inaction and Mussolini's defiant speech on January 3, 1925, admitting responsibility for squadristi actions while rejecting accountability, solidified his dictatorship. By late 1925, Mussolini banned all non-Fascist parties, established the OVRA secret police, and required civil servants to swear loyalty oaths, transforming Italy into a one-party state under the Grand Council of Fascism, which he chaired. The regime's economic policies emphasized corporatism, organizing society into state-supervised syndicates representing employers, workers, and the state to mediate class conflicts and pursue autarky. Enacted through the Palazzo Vidoni Pact in 1925 and formalized in the 1927 Charter of Labor, this system banned independent unions, replacing them with 22 corporations by 1934 that set wages and production quotas under ministerial oversight, aiming for a "third way" between capitalism and socialism but resulting in increased state intervention and inefficiency. Initiatives like the Battle for Grain (1925) boosted wheat production from 5.5 million tons in 1925 to 7.5 million by 1935 through subsidies and land reclamation, reducing imports by 75%, though at the cost of diversified agriculture. Public works, including the draining of Pontine Marshes (completed 1935, reclaiming 80,000 hectares for 20 new towns and reducing malaria incidence from 80% to near zero in affected areas), construction of 400,000 miles of roads, and hydroelectric expansion, employed up to 100,000 workers annually and contributed to GDP growth averaging 2.5% yearly from 1922-1938, stabilizing post-World War I hyperinflation. However, autarkic policies post-1935, including the 1936 Four-Year Plan for self-sufficiency, stifled trade and innovation, with real wages stagnating at 1929 levels by 1939 despite propaganda claims of prosperity. Social and cultural policies sought national regeneration through indoctrination and traditionalism. Mussolini promoted demographics via the 1927 fertility campaign, offering tax incentives and banning abortion, raising birth rates from 27.4 per 1,000 in 1922 to a peak but failing to reverse long-term decline. Youth organizations like the Opera Nazionale Balilla (mandatory from 1926) and education reforms emphasized militarism and obedience, with 1923 laws requiring fascist textbooks; by 1939, over 3 million youth were enrolled, fostering loyalty but suppressing intellectual freedom. The 1929 Lateran Pacts with the Vatican, signed February 11, resolved the Roman Question by recognizing Vatican City as sovereign (44 hectares) and Catholicism as Italy's state religion, granting the Church control over marriage laws and religious education in exchange for papal non-interference in politics, thereby securing conservative support. Foreign policy shifted from selective interventionism to aggressive expansionism. Italy invaded Ethiopia on October 3, 1935, with 500,000 troops using mustard gas despite League of Nations sanctions, conquering Addis Ababa by May 1936 and annexing it as Italian East Africa to revive imperial glory, though the victory masked logistical failures and cost 15,000 Italian lives. Alignment with Nazi Germany culminated in the 1939 Pact of Steel and intervention in the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), committing 75,000 troops but yielding minimal gains. Mussolini declared war on France and Britain on June 10, 1940, believing Germany near victory, but Italy's ill-prepared forces—lacking modern tanks and fuel—suffered defeats in Greece (1940-1941, requiring German bailout) and North Africa, where 400,000 troops were lost or captured by 1943. Allied invasions of Sicily (July 1943) and mainland Italy precipitated Mussolini's downfall. On July 25, 1943, the Fascist Grand Council voted 19-7 to strip him of command, leading King Victor Emmanuel III to arrest him and appoint Marshal Pietro Badoglio as prime minister; Mussolini was rescued by German commandos in September and installed as puppet leader of the Italian Social Republic in northern Italy, but the regime collapsed amid civil war and Allied advances by April 1945. The era achieved short-term order and infrastructure gains but failed in military modernization and economic self-sufficiency, with war devastation exacerbating pre-existing inefficiencies and leading to 450,000 Italian military deaths.

Variants in Other Countries

In Spain, the Falange Española emerged in 1933 under José Antonio Primo de Rivera as a fascist movement explicitly modeled on Italian Fascism, emphasizing national syndicalism, anti-parliamentarism, and a hierarchical corporatist economy to transcend capitalism and socialism. After merging with Carlists and other monarchists in 1937 during the Spanish Civil War, it provided ideological backbone to Francisco Franco's regime post-1939, though Franco subordinated its revolutionary zeal to conservative authoritarianism, retaining fascist symbols like the yoke and arrows until the 1950s. This variant adapted fascism to Catholic traditionalism and anti-communism, achieving electoral irrelevance after Primo de Rivera's execution in 1936 but influencing state corporatism and labor organizations under Franco until his death in 1975. Austrofascism, implemented by Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss from 1932 to 1934, represented a clerical-authoritarian adaptation banning both Nazis and socialists via emergency decrees in March 1933, establishing a corporatist Ständestaat modeled partly on Italian structures but prioritizing Austrian independence and Catholic social doctrine over racialism. Dollfuss's Fatherland Front unified conservative forces, suspending parliament and enacting concordats with the Vatican, yet his regime's resistance to Anschluss led to his assassination by Austrian Nazis on July 25, 1934; successor Kurt Schuschnigg maintained the system until the 1938 German annexation. Scholars note its fascist elements in one-party rule and suppression of dissent but distinguish it from Italian dynamism by its defensive, anti-Nazi orientation and lack of mass mobilization. In Romania, the Iron Guard (Legion of the Archangel Michael), founded in 1927 by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, fused Orthodox mysticism with fascist nationalism, antisemitism, and paramilitary violence, gaining 15.6% of the vote in 1937 elections through rituals of martyrdom and economic boycotts targeting Jews. Briefly holding power in 1940 under Ion Antonescu, it orchestrated pogroms like the Iași massacre in June 1941, killing up to 13,266 Jews, before Antonescu purged it amid wartime failures. This "sacralized" variant emphasized spiritual revolution over secular totalitarianism, influencing post-communist ultranationalism despite its suppression by 1941. Portugal's Estado Novo under António de Oliveira Salazar from 1933 to 1968 incorporated corporatist institutions like the Grémios and anti-communist censorship, drawing partial inspiration from Mussolini's Italy, yet prioritized fiscal conservatism, colonial stability, and Catholic integralism over fascist expansionism or cult of personality. Salazar's regime avoided revolutionary rhetoric, maintaining neutrality in World War II and suppressing the fascist-inspired Blue Shirts by 1935, leading many historians to classify it as conservative authoritarianism rather than true fascism due to limited mass ideology and absence of palingenetic violence. Croatian Ustaše, formed in 1929 by Ante Pavelić, ruled the Axis puppet Independent State of Croatia from 1941 to 1945, blending fascism with Catholic clericalism and genocidal Croat supremacy, establishing concentration camps like Jasenovac where up to 100,000 Serbs, Jews, and Roma perished. Supported by Italian Fascists and Nazis, it enacted racial laws in April 1941 targeting Serbs for extermination or expulsion, reflecting a variant obsessed with ethnic purification over economic corporatism, collapsing with Axis defeat in May 1945.

Relationship to National Socialism in Germany

National Socialism, as embodied by Adolf Hitler's regime in Germany from 1933 to 1945, emerged partly inspired by Italian Fascism, with Hitler citing Mussolini's March on Rome in October 1922 as a blueprint for revolutionary action that shaped his own failed Beer Hall Putsch in November 1923. Mussolini, however, initially dismissed early National Socialists as crude imitators tainted by residual socialist rhetoric and lacking genuine fascist discipline, blocking Nazi influence in Austria until the mid-1930s. Diplomatic ties strengthened after Hitler's 1933 rise to power, with Mussolini providing tacit support for German rearmament and the 1936 remilitarization of the Rhineland, evolving into the formal military alliance of the Pact of Steel, signed on May 22, 1939, which committed Italy and Germany to mutual defense and coordination in foreign policy. This pact facilitated joint Axis operations in World War II, though Italy's military unpreparedness—evident in its delayed entry into the war on June 10, 1940—strained the partnership, leading to German occupation of northern Italy after Mussolini's 1943 ouster. Core ideological divergences centered on race and state philosophy: Fascism prioritized the ethical state and national unity as transcendent forces, eschewing biological determinism, whereas National Socialism enshrined Aryan racial purity as foundational, mandating eugenics, sterilization laws from 1933, and eventual genocide via the Holocaust, which claimed approximately 6 million Jewish lives by 1945. Italian Fascism lacked inherent antisemitism, with Jews holding prominent roles in Mussolini's government until the October 1938 Manifesto of Race, enacted under pressure to align with Nazi policies and secure alliance benefits, resulting in discriminatory laws but no systematic extermination. Economically, both systems directed private enterprise toward national goals—Fascist Italy through 22 mandatory corporations for class collaboration and autarky via the 1927 Battle for Grain, Nazi Germany through the Four-Year Plan of 1936 emphasizing rearmament—but Nazism subordinated economics more explicitly to racial war aims, expropriating Jewish assets on a scale unmatched in Italy. Historians classify National Socialism as a fascist variant due to shared authoritarianism, leader worship, and rejection of parliamentary democracy, yet emphasize its unique racial extremism as a causal driver of unprecedented violence, distinguishing it from Fascism's pragmatic nationalism. This relationship reflects Fascism's adaptability, influencing but not fully encompassing Nazism's totalitarian scope.

Policies and Governance

Social and Cultural Policies

Fascist social policies in Italy emphasized the strengthening of traditional family structures and national demographics to bolster military and economic power. In a 1927 speech, Mussolini launched the "Battle for Births," aiming to increase Italy's population from approximately 40 million to 60 million by 1950 through pronatalist measures, including taxes on unmarried men aged 25 to 65, bans on the sale of contraceptives and abortion (except to save the mother's life), marriage loans repayable through childbirths, and awards such as medals and exemptions from taxes for families with six or more children. These policies framed women primarily as reproducers, discouraging their employment outside the home—female factory workers dropped from 27% of the workforce in 1921 to under 10% by 1936—and promoting ideals of male authority and female domesticity as essential to fascist hierarchy. Youth indoctrination formed a core component, with the Opera Nazionale Balilla established in 1926 to organize boys aged 8 to 14 (and later girls in separate groups) in paramilitary drills, sports, and ideological training to instill discipline, obedience, and fascist loyalty from an early age. By 1937, it merged into the Gioventù Italiana del Littorio, encompassing all youth up to 21 and making membership compulsory, with activities designed to prepare future citizens for national service and combat readiness. Education was reoriented toward fascist values through the 1923 Gentile Reform, led by philosopher Giovanni Gentile, which prioritized classical studies, moral education rooted in nationalism, and the exclusion of non-fascist influences, while requiring teachers to swear loyalty oaths to the regime. Curricula emphasized Roman history, imperialism, and anti-materialist philosophy, aiming to cultivate a unified national ethos, though implementation faced resistance and later modifications under figures like Giuseppe Bottai. Cultural policies enforced conformity via strict media and artistic controls. The 1925 Press Law centralized censorship under Mussolini's office, closing opposition newspapers, mandating pre-approval of content, and subordinating journalism to propaganda, with the regime's Ministry of Popular Culture by 1937 overseeing films, radio, and literature to promote fascist aesthetics like monumentalism and rural glorification. Independent expression was curtailed, though selective tolerance allowed aligned modernist experiments in architecture and design to symbolize renewal.

Military and Expansionist Policies

Mussolini's fascist regime prioritized military strength as a cornerstone of national rejuvenation, embedding expansionism in its ideology to reclaim Italy's perceived Roman imperial destiny and secure spazio vitale (vital space) through territorial conquest. This approach framed war not merely as defense but as a purifying force for societal discipline and economic autarky, with Mussolini declaring in 1926 that Italy sought "a place in the sun" akin to other imperial powers, rejecting isolation in favor of aggressive diplomacy. The Mediterranean was reimagined as Mare Nostrum ("Our Sea"), a dominion echoing ancient Rome, where Italian hegemony would counter British and French influence via naval buildup and strategic bases. Rearmament accelerated in the mid-1930s amid autarkic policies, diverting resources from civilian sectors to armaments, aircraft production, and colonial forces, though chronic industrial limitations and corruption hampered efficiency. By 1939, Italy's military doctrine emphasized rapid offensives and mass mobilization, but preparations proved inadequate for sustained conflict, as evidenced by logistical failures in subsequent campaigns. Expansionist ventures began with the Second Italo-Ethiopian War, launched on October 3, 1935, against Emperor Haile Selassie's forces; Italian troops, numbering over 500,000 with air and chemical support, overran Ethiopian resistance by May 1936, enabling Mussolini to proclaim the Italian Empire on May 9, 1936, despite League of Nations sanctions that exposed diplomatic isolation. Further aggressions included the occupation of Albania on April 7, 1939, where minimally resisted landings installed a puppet monarchy under King Victor Emmanuel III, securing Adriatic flanks for Mediterranean ambitions. The Pact of Steel, signed with Nazi Germany on May 22, 1939, formalized military alliance, paving the way for Italy's entry into World War II on June 10, 1940, with declarations of war against France and Britain to seize colonial territories. Subsequent operations, such as the stalled invasion of Greece starting October 28, 1940—where Italian forces suffered 100,000 casualties amid harsh terrain and poor supply lines—revealed doctrinal overreach, necessitating German intervention in April 1941 to avert collapse. These policies fostered a militarized society through mandatory youth training and propaganda glorifying conquest, yet empirical outcomes underscored causal weaknesses: initial tactical successes in Ethiopia and Albania masked strategic vulnerabilities, including obsolete equipment and divided command, contributing to defeats in North Africa by 1941 and ultimate regime downfall in 1943. Expansionism prioritized prestige over feasibility, straining resources and alienating potential allies, as Mussolini's bids for empire clashed with Italy's industrial base, limited to short wars rather than prolonged total conflict.

Suppression of Opposition and Totalitarian Control

The Fascist regime in Italy employed paramilitary squads known as Blackshirts, or squadristi, to systematically intimidate and assault political opponents, particularly socialists and communists, through violent raids and punitive expeditions beginning in 1920. These actions targeted labor unions and leftist gatherings, with local police often refraining from intervention or actively facilitating the violence, which contributed to the collapse of socialist influence in northern and central Italy by 1922. Following Benito Mussolini's appointment as prime minister in October 1922 after the March on Rome, the regime transitioned from extralegal violence to institutionalized repression, culminating in the establishment of a one-party state. The murder of socialist deputy Giacomo Matteotti in June 1924, amid electoral irregularities under the Acerbo Law of 1923 that favored Fascist lists, prompted Mussolini's January 3, 1925, speech assuming full responsibility for squadristi actions and signaling the end of parliamentary opposition. Subsequent laws in November 1926 dissolved all non-Fascist parties, trade unions, and opposition organizations, while authorizing preventive arrests and exiling dissidents to remote islands like Lipari and Ustica. To enforce compliance, Mussolini created the Organization for Vigilance and Repression of Anti-Fascism (OVRA) in 1927 as a secret police apparatus under the Interior Ministry, which conducted widespread surveillance, infiltrated opposition networks, and orchestrated assassinations of exiles, such as the Rosselli brothers in 1937. OVRA's operations extended internationally to monitor Italian émigrés, employing informants and wiretaps to preempt dissent, resulting in thousands of arrests and confino (internal exile) sentences by the 1930s. Parallel to this, the regime imposed strict censorship via the Press Law of 1925 and the Ministry of Popular Culture (established 1937), requiring pre-approval of all publications, films, and broadcasts to eliminate critical content and propagate Fascist ideology. Totalitarian control manifested in the regime's penetration of civil society, where the Voluntary Militia for National Security (MVSN), successor to the Blackshirts, maintained public order alongside OVRA, while mandatory Fascist youth organizations and corporatist structures supplanted independent associations. Dissenters faced not only imprisonment in facilities like the confino islands—holding over 10,000 by 1943—but also social ostracism through loyalty oaths required of civil servants, teachers, and journalists starting in 1925 and intensified in 1931. This multifaceted apparatus ensured minimal organized resistance until the regime's wartime collapse, though underground networks persisted among communists and liberals.

Achievements and Empirical Outcomes

Economic Stabilization and Public Works

Upon assuming power in October 1922, Mussolini's government confronted an economy ravaged by post-World War I inflation, which had reached 600% annually by 1920, mass unemployment exceeding 500,000 in 1921, and widespread strikes during the Biennio Rosso. Initial policies emphasized fiscal orthodoxy, including budget balancing under Finance Minister Alberto De Stefani, which reduced public spending and restored investor confidence, contributing to over 20% real GDP growth between 1921 and 1925. Unemployment plummeted by 77% in the same period, from roughly 430,000 to under 100,000, as suppressed labor unrest and deflationary measures—such as a 20% wage cut in 1927—facilitated industrial recovery. The 1926 stabilization of the lira at the "Quota 90" rate of 90 lire to the British pound further anchored monetary policy, averting hyperinflation recurrence despite short-term export contraction. Public works programs, framed as autarchic self-reliance efforts, generated employment and infrastructure gains amid the Great Depression's onset. The Battle for Grain, launched in 1925, subsidized wheat cultivation and mechanization, boosting domestic production by approximately 40-50% by 1939 and slashing wheat imports by 75% between 1925 and 1935, thereby reducing food dependency. Though diverting land from higher-value crops like olives and vines, it created rural jobs for over 300,000 workers annually in peak years and symbolized national mobilization. Land reclamation epitomized Fascist engineering feats, particularly the bonifica integrale of the Pontine Marshes south of Rome, initiated in 1928 and substantially completed by 1939. This project drained 75,000 hectares of malarial swampland using canals, pumps, and embankments, resettling 3,000 families in model towns like Littoria (founded 1932) and Sabaudia (1934), with modern housing, schools, and farms that eradicated endemic malaria in the region by the mid-1930s. Employing up to 100,000 laborers at its height, it not only cut national unemployment—already halved from 1922 peaks—but also increased arable land by 20% in Lazio province, yielding sustainable agricultural output. Complementary initiatives, such as the 1924-1930s expansion of the autostrada network (including the Milan-Lakes Highway) and railway electrification, further absorbed labor, with public investment rising to 25% of GDP by 1938, fostering modest industrial output growth despite autarky constraints. These efforts, while propagandized as triumphs of state-directed will, empirically mitigated economic volatility through deficit-financed projects that prioritized visible, labor-intensive gains over long-term efficiency.

Social Order and National Unity

The fascist regime in Italy under Benito Mussolini inherited a society plagued by post-World War I instability, including the "red biennium" of 1919–1920 marked by over 2,000 strikes involving nearly 2 million workers and widespread factory occupations. Following the March on Rome in October 1922 and the establishment of dictatorial powers via the Acerbo Law of 1923 and subsequent suppression of opposition, the regime dismantled independent trade unions and socialist organizations through violence and legal bans, resulting in a near-total elimination of strikes by 1926. This corporatist restructuring subordinated labor to state-controlled syndicates, enforcing industrial peace and averting the revolutionary upheavals seen in other European nations, thereby stabilizing production and reducing class-based disruptions. Official crime statistics reflected a marked decline during the 1920s and 1930s, attributed to rigorous policing, penal reforms emphasizing prevention over punishment, and the centralization of authority under the Ministry of the Interior. Prison populations decreased substantially, from approximately 50,000 inmates in 1922 to around 30,000 by the early 1930s, alongside reductions in reported violent crimes. In regions like Sicily, Mussolini's appointment of Cesare Mori as prefect in 1925 initiated a campaign that dismantled Mafia networks through mass arrests and trials, leading to a sharp drop in homicides and organized crime activity. These measures, while involving extralegal coercion, empirically curtailed the diffuse violence of the pre-fascist era, including squadristi clashes and leftist insurrections, establishing state monopoly over force. On national unity, the regime pursued integration of Italy's fragmented social fabric—divided by regional dialects, class antagonisms, and ideological rifts—through aggressive nationalism and mass mobilization. Propaganda portrayed Mussolini as the embodiment of the nation's will, while institutions like the Opera Nazionale Balilla (founded 1926) and the Gioventù Italiana del Littorio (1937) indoctrinated over 3 million youth annually in fascist values, promoting physical fitness, militarism, and loyalty to the state over local identities. Corporatism theoretically harmonized interests between labor and capital under national goals, and imperial ventures, such as the conquest of Ethiopia in 1935–1936, generated temporary enthusiasm across classes, with public celebrations and volunteer enlistments exceeding 100,000. This engineered cohesion suppressed overt divisions, enabling coordinated efforts like the "Battle for Grain" autarky campaign, though underlying tensions persisted beneath enforced consensus.

Infrastructure and Technological Advances

The Fascist regime in Italy prioritized large-scale public works to modernize infrastructure, create employment, and symbolize national renewal through projects like land reclamation and transportation networks. The bonifica integrale (integral reclamation) of the Pontine Marshes south of Rome, initiated in the 1920s and intensified after 1928, drained approximately 80,000 hectares of malarial swampland via dikes, canals, and pumping stations, converting it into fertile farmland. By December 1932, the initial phase had reclaimed 25,250 acres, establishing over 2,000 farmsteads and four new towns—Littoria (renamed Latina in 1947), Sabaudia, Pontinia, and Aprilia—housing thousands of settler families and integrating modern roads and utilities. This effort reduced malaria cases by over 80 percent in the region by the late 1930s and increased agricultural productivity, with population and livestock numbers rising 64 percent and 134 percent respectively in reclaimed zones. Transportation infrastructure advanced through the construction of autostrade, Italy's pioneering motorway system, begun in 1924 with the Milan-Prealpine Lakes route. By 1935, nearly 480 kilometers had been built, including 378.8 km in the north, 81.2 km in central Italy, and 20.9 km in the south, featuring divided lanes, overpasses, and service areas to accommodate rising automobile use. These highways enhanced connectivity between industrial centers and rural areas, reducing travel times and supporting economic mobilization, though construction relied heavily on state subsidies amid limited private investment. Railway electrification formed another cornerstone, with a program launched in the early 1930s transforming key lines from steam to electric power for greater efficiency and speed. By October 1939, approximately 3,200 miles (5,150 km) of track were electrified, covering major corridors like Milan to Reggio Calabria and enabling electric multiple units such as the ETR 200 to achieve world-record average speeds of 165 km/h over 316 km in July 1939. This expansion, which included new locomotives like the E.626 series (448 units built between 1927 and 1939), boosted freight capacity for industrialization and improved passenger services, contributing to perceptions of enhanced reliability despite pre-existing issues. In energy infrastructure, Fascist policies drove hydroelectric development, exploiting Alpine rivers through dams and diversion tunnels to supply power for heavy industry and electrification projects. Post-1928 initiatives, such as those on the Toce River, created extensive "hydroscapes" that increased installed capacity and output, with electricity production rising from about 3.5 billion kWh in 1922 to over 15 billion kWh by 1939, predominantly from hydro sources. These advances supported autarkic goals but often prioritized quantity over long-term sustainability, involving environmental alterations like valley flooding. Technological efforts extended to aviation, where state-backed programs produced advanced monoplanes and fostered long-distance flight records, exemplified by Italo Balbo's 1933 transatlantic air cruise with 24 seaplanes, demonstrating engineering feats in navigation and aircraft design. Overall, these initiatives yielded tangible assets—enduring roads, electrified rails, and power grids—that facilitated post-war recovery, though their scale was amplified by regime propaganda and financed through deficit spending.

Criticisms and Failures

Authoritarian Repression and Human Rights Abuses

The Fascist regime in Italy systematically suppressed political dissent through paramilitary violence in its formative years. From 1919 to 1922, squadristi groups orchestrated assaults, beatings, and murders targeting socialists, communists, and labor organizers, creating an atmosphere of terror that facilitated the movement's rise to power. Political violence in this period alone claimed around 320 lives between April 1919 and September 1920, with squadrismo escalating the scale of attacks thereafter through systematic intimidation and destruction of opposition institutions. After Benito Mussolini's appointment as prime minister in October 1922, repression became institutionalized via the exceptional laws of November 1926, which outlawed opposition parties, curtailed civil liberties, and enabled confino—administrative exile to remote islands or villages without judicial process. The OVRA (Organization for Vigilance and Repression of Anti-Fascism), formed in 1927 under Arturo Bocchini, functioned as a secret police apparatus, monitoring citizens, conducting warrantless arrests, and using coercive methods including torture to dismantle underground networks. The Special Tribunal for the Defense of the State, established in 1926, further entrenched this control by trying over 2,400 individuals for political offenses in its early years, issuing convictions that often led to lengthy imprisonments or confino. Between 1926 and 1943, the regime confined tens of thousands to penal islands and remote locales, where conditions involved forced labor, isolation, and inadequate provisions, affecting anti-fascists, ethnic minorities, and later suspected wartime saboteurs. Human rights violations extended to censorship of the press and assembly, with independent newspapers shuttered and public criticism equated to treason, punishable by OVRA raids or tribunal proceedings. Notable cases included the April 10, 1924, assassination of socialist deputy Giacomo Matteotti, widely attributed to fascist operatives despite official denials, which underscored the regime's tolerance for extrajudicial elimination of threats. During World War II, from 1940 onward, internment expanded to civilian camps for Jews, Slovenes, and Croats in occupied territories, involving mass roundups and confinement without due process, though on a scale smaller than Nazi extermination efforts. These mechanisms prioritized regime survival over individual rights, resulting in widespread arbitrary detention, physical abuse, and erosion of legal protections, as documented in survivor accounts and police records, though official statistics were often underreported to maintain the facade of a consensual dictatorship.

Economic Inefficiencies and War Mobilization

The corporatist framework in fascist Italy, established through the Charter of Labour in 1927, aimed to integrate state oversight with private enterprise but fostered inefficiencies via overlapping bureaucracies, suppressed labor mobility, and preferential treatment for regime-aligned firms, distorting resource allocation and discouraging competition. Autarky initiatives, such as the 1925 Battle for Grain, compelled farmers to shift acreage to wheat at the expense of higher-value exports like olives, yielding short-term production spikes but long-term cost increases and agricultural stagnation, with overall output rising modestly from an index of 100 in 1922 to 147.8 by 1937 amid persistent inefficiencies. Industrial growth averaged about 1.6% annually from 1929 to 1939—half the rate of prior liberal periods—hampered by protectionist barriers and state-directed investments that prioritized prestige projects over productivity. In Nazi Germany, the 1936 Four-Year Plan enforced autarky through costly synthetic industries; coal-to-fuel processes, subsidized heavily, produced liquids at up to five times the price of imports while demanding disproportionate energy inputs, diverting capital from viable alternatives and yielding only partial self-sufficiency by 1939. Rearmament intensified distortions, with military outlays surging from 1% of GNP in 1933 to 8% in 1935, 13% in 1936, and over 20% by 1938, financed via off-balance-sheet Mefo bills that concealed deficits but exhausted foreign reserves and fueled inflation pressures, rendering peacetime sustainability impossible without territorial expansion. War mobilization exposed systemic frailties. Italy's entry into World War II in 1940 without full economic conversion led to rapid industrial decline, as inadequate planning and resource shortages—exacerbated by prewar autarky—prevented sustained output, culminating in regime collapse by 1943. Germany's partial mobilization until Albert Speer's 1942 appointment reflected ideological resistance to total war measures like widespread female conscription and inter-ministerial turf wars, compounded by low productivity from coerced labor; even as spending reached 75% of GDP by 1944, inefficiencies in duplication and supply chains lagged behind Allied efficiencies, hastening defeat.

Racial and Eugenic Policies

In 1938, Fascist Italy under Benito Mussolini introduced formal racial policies through the "Manifesto of Race," published on July 14 in Il Giornale d'Italia, which asserted that Italians belonged to a pure Mediterranean Aryan race distinct from Africans and Semites, prohibited miscegenation in colonies, and rejected egalitarian racial theories as antithetical to Fascist imperialism. These measures, influenced by the 1936 Axis alliance with Nazi Germany and Mussolini's emulation of Hitler's racial framework, marked a shift from earlier pragmatic imperialism to explicit biological racism, despite limited prior anti-Semitic enforcement. Subsequent decrees from September to November 1938 defined Jews by descent and religion, barring them from civil service, military officer roles, journalism, and university teaching; limited Jewish enrollment in schools to 10% quotas; and restricted property ownership and business partnerships. Approximately 45,000 Jews lived in Italy in 1938, comprising less than 0.1% of the population; the laws led to the dismissal of about 200 university professors, 300 military officers, and thousands from professions, prompting emigration of around 10,000 individuals by 1939. Policies extended to colonial territories, banning intermarriage and segregating "inferior" races, but enforcement remained inconsistent until German occupation in 1943. Eugenic dimensions emphasized "positive" measures to enhance population quality through pronatalist campaigns like the 1927 Battle for Births, which offered tax exemptions and subsidies for families with six or more children, aiming to raise the birth rate from 2.3 million in 1922 to counter "racial sterility" and support imperial expansion. Negative eugenics proposals, such as sterilizing the mentally ill or "hereditarily defective," were advanced by figures like Sabato Stefano Cavalli but rejected by the regime, partly due to Vatican opposition under Pope Pius XI's 1930 encyclical Casti Connubii condemning sterilization as immoral. Instead, racial laws served eugenic ends by excluding "undesirables" from reproduction and citizenship, though without systematic programs like Germany's 1933 sterilization law. These policies drew criticism for their pseudoscientific foundation, relying on discredited anthropometric classifications and Lamarckian inheritance theories rather than Mendelian genetics, which undermined claims of racial purity and improvement. Domestically, they provoked unease among Fascist elites and the public, with Mussolini privately acknowledging their unpopularity by 1939; internationally, they isolated Italy, exacerbating diplomatic failures leading to World War II entry in 1940. Empirically, the policies failed to achieve purported goals: birth rates rose modestly to 1.2 million annually by 1934 before stagnating due to economic strain and war, yielding no verifiable genetic "upgrading" while incurring social costs, including the 1943-1945 deportation of 8,000 Jews to Auschwitz (with only 1,000 survivors) under the German-backed Salò Republic. Economic losses from excluding Jewish professionals—contributors to fields like medicine and science—compounded inefficiencies, and the measures fueled internal dissent, contributing to the regime's 1943 collapse amid Allied invasion and partisan resistance. Overall, the initiatives exemplified authoritarian overreach, prioritizing ideological purity over evidence-based outcomes and accelerating Fascism's downfall through moral and practical bankruptcy.

Placement on the Political Spectrum

Arguments for Left-Wing Roots and Collectivism

Benito Mussolini, founder of fascism, spent over a decade as a leading figure in the Italian Socialist Party, editing its official newspaper Avanti! from 1912 to 1914 and promoting revolutionary socialism prior to his expulsion in 1914 for supporting Italy's intervention in World War I. Despite the break, Mussolini retained socialist influences, crediting thinkers like French Marxist Georges Sorel, whose revolutionary syndicalism—emphasizing worker militancy, myth-making for mobilization, and rejection of parliamentary reform—inspired fascism's early tactics and anti-capitalist rhetoric. Sorel's ideas bridged Marxism and nationalism, providing a framework for Mussolini's shift from international class struggle to national worker solidarity, as seen in the 1919 founding of the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento. This synthesis found early expression in France through the Cercle Proudhon, founded around 1911, which integrated Proudhonian mutualism and federalism with Sorelian syndicalism and integral nationalism, contributing to national syndicalist doctrines that influenced the ideological formation of fascism. Fascism adapted left-wing syndicalism into "national syndicalism," subordinating labor organizations to the state while opposing both liberal individualism and Marxist internationalism. Giovanni Gentile, fascism's chief philosopher and co-author of The Doctrine of Fascism (1932), explicitly framed it as "a form of socialism, in fact, its most viable form," arguing for the ethical state as the embodiment of collective will over private interests. This collectivist ethos echoed socialist prioritization of the group—Mussolini's nation-state replacing the proletariat—while rejecting free-market liberalism, which fascists derided as atomizing society. Fascist economics reinforced this left-wing collectivism through corporatism, a system of state-directed syndicates that controlled production quotas, wages, prices, and resource allocation, effectively merging private ownership with public planning. By 1939, Italy's government nationalized over four-fifths of shipping and shipbuilding, dominated 80% of credit, imposed mandatory cartels, and subsidized 75% of economic output by 1934, aiming for autarky and war readiness under centralized authority. Mussolini described this as "state capitalism," paralleling Lenin's New Economic Policy, and pursued further "socialization" in the 1943 Italian Social Republic, collaborating with former communists like Nicola Bombacci to anti-capitalist ends. Proponents of fascism's left-wing classification, including historian A. James Gregor, contend it derives from radical syndicalist Marxism, sharing totalitarian collectivism with Bolshevism as "heresies of socialism" that demand individual sacrifice for state-directed unity. Richard Pipes similarly notes both ideologies' roots in socialist rejection of markets and emphasis on coercive harmony, distinguishing them from right-wing traditions of limited government. Mussolini himself affirmed in 1945, "We are the working class in struggle… against capitalism," underscoring fascism's self-perceived continuity with proletarian aims, albeit nationalized. Historical evidence further shows that portions of the working class voted for fascist parties. In Germany, the Nazis gained support from working-class voters, particularly Protestant workers in rural and small-town areas, amid economic hardship and disillusionment with socialist and communist parties. Similar patterns occurred in Italy under Mussolini, where some former socialist supporters shifted to fascism.

Mainstream Views as Far-Right Nationalism

In mainstream historiography and political science, fascism is classified as a far-right ideology, distinguished by its ultranationalist fervor, authoritarian centralization of power, and rejection of both liberal individualism and socialist internationalism. This positioning emphasizes fascism's prioritization of the nation as an organic, hierarchical entity requiring rebirth (palingenesis) through dictatorial leadership and mass mobilization, as opposed to the class-based egalitarianism of leftist movements. Political scientist Cas Mudde, in delineating subtypes of the far right, categorizes fascism within the "extreme right," marked by its overt anti-democratic and nativist orientations that exceed the more electoral constraints of radical right populism. Historians such as Roger Griffin further solidify this far-right attribution by defining fascism as a "revolutionary form of ultra-nationalism" that mythologizes national renewal while scorning parliamentary democracy and Marxist materialism, traits aligning it with right-wing extremism rather than progressive or collectivist leftism. Griffin's framework, influential since the 1990s, highlights fascism's nominalist core—obsessive focus on ethnic or cultural homogeneity and imperial expansion—as antithetical to universalist ideologies, thereby embedding it on the right end of the traditional spectrum. Similarly, Stanley G. Payne's typological analysis identifies fascism's core through negations (anti-liberalism, anti-communism, anti-conservatism in its revolutionary phase) and positive traits like expansive nationalism and a cult of action, which in practice manifested as alliances with traditional elites against leftist threats, reinforcing its far-right operational character despite syncretic elements. This classification persists due to fascism's empirical opposition to left-wing egalitarianism: Italian Fascism under Benito Mussolini, formalized in the 1921 party platform and 1932 Doctrine of Fascism, subordinated economic corporatism to state-directed national interests, suppressing strikes and independent unions while preserving private property under hierarchical control—contrasting with socialist expropriation. German National Socialism echoed this by allying with industrialists against Bolshevik-style collectivization, enacting policies like the 1933 Enabling Act that centralized power in a racially stratified volkisch order, prioritizing Aryan national purity over class solidarity. Mainstream accounts, drawing from interwar electoral data—such as the Nazi Party's 37.3% vote share in July 1932 amid economic collapse and perceived communist agitation—frame fascism's ascent as a reactionary bulwark against leftist radicalism, enlisting conservative support to dismantle Weimar institutions. Critics within academia note that this far-right labeling, dominant since the post-1945 antifascist consensus, may overlook fascism's borrowings from syndicalist and statist traditions originally leftist in origin, potentially influenced by institutional tendencies to bifurcate totalitarianism along ideological lines favoring left-right binaries. Nonetheless, empirical outcomes—such as Mussolini's 1925 suppression of socialist opposition and Hitler's 1934 Night of the Long Knives purging leftist SA elements—underscore the regime's pivot toward nationalist authoritarianism, sustaining the mainstream spectral placement despite ongoing debates over its third-way pretensions. This view informs contemporary analyses, where fascism's hallmarks are invoked to critique nativist movements, though such applications risk diluting historical specificity.

Syncretic Nature and Rejections of Binary Classifications

Fascism emerged as a syncretic political ideology that fused elements of nationalism, corporatism, anti-liberalism, and statist interventionism, drawing selectively from both socialist collectivism and conservative hierarchies while repudiating the materialism of Marxism and the individualism of classical liberalism. This blending defied binary categorizations, as fascists contended that the left-right dichotomy—rooted in 19th-century class conflicts—failed to capture the holistic, action-oriented revolution they advocated, which prioritized national unity over ideological purity. In The Doctrine of Fascism (1932), Benito Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile articulated this stance, describing fascism as neither a static party doctrine nor aligned with traditional spectrums, but as a dynamic force born from praxis that subordinated economics to the state's ethical imperatives, preserving private initiative within a corporatist framework that echoed syndicalist influences from the left while enforcing hierarchical order akin to right-wing authoritarianism. Scholars such as Zeev Sternhell have traced fascism's intellectual origins to an "anti-materialist revision of Marxism," where early 20th-century thinkers like Georges Sorel integrated Marxist class struggle with nationalist vitalism and anti-rationalist aesthetics, creating a hybrid that rejected egalitarian internationalism in favor of organic national communities. This revisionism manifested in fascism's economic policies, which combined welfare provisions and public works—reminiscent of social democratic measures—with private property protections and anti-union purges, as seen in Mussolini's 1927 Charter of Labour, which institutionalized class collaboration under state mediation rather than abolition or laissez-faire. Similarly, Nazi Germany's "National Socialism" invoked socialist rhetoric in its 1920 party platform, promising profit-sharing and land reform, yet subordinated these to racial hierarchy and autarky, illustrating a pragmatic eclecticism that prioritized total mobilization over doctrinal consistency. Fascist leaders explicitly rejected binary classifications, with Mussolini declaring in 1921 that fascism represented a "third way" transcending the "sterile" oppositions of bourgeoisie versus proletariat, aiming instead for a totalitarian synthesis where the state embodied the nation's will. This position persisted in fascist propaganda, which portrayed liberalism and communism as twin symptoms of decadence, to be supplanted by a palingenetic nationalism that integrated futurist modernism, traditionalism, and imperial expansionism. Empirical analysis of fascist governance supports this syncretism: Italy's regime nationalized key industries like IRI in 1933 while maintaining capitalist alliances, achieving GDP growth of 2-3% annually from 1922-1938 through mixed public-private initiatives, neither fully socialist expropriation nor unfettered markets. Critics of rigid spectral placements, including some post-war analysts, argue that fascism's rejection of binaries stemmed from its pragmatic adaptation to crises—hyperinflation in Italy (peaking at 1,200% in 1920) and Weimar Germany's 300% unemployment in 1932—necessitating eclectic policies that borrowed from wherever efficacious, rather than ideological dogma. However, mainstream academic classifications often emphasize fascism's ultranationalism and anti-egalitarianism to situate it on the "far-right," potentially underplaying its collectivist mechanisms due to post-1945 ideological alignments that equated any statism with leftism only when non-nationalist. This syncretic fluidity, fascists maintained, rendered traditional labels obsolete, positioning their movement as a totalizing alternative attuned to the "spirit of the age" rather than partisan divides.

Controversies and Modern Debates

Misapplications in Contemporary Politics

In contemporary political discourse, the label "fascism" is routinely applied to populist leaders, nationalist policies, and conservative movements lacking the totalitarian structures, revolutionary violence, and state corporatism central to historical regimes like Mussolini's Italy or Hitler's Germany. This rhetorical deployment serves to equate electoral dissent with existential threats, diluting the term's precision and hindering analysis of actual authoritarian risks. Scholars note that such overuse transforms "fascism" from a specific ideology—defined by palingenetic ultranationalism, the fusion of state and corporate power under a single party, and the eradication of pluralism—into a vague pejorative for any right-leaning opposition. A prominent example occurred in U.S. politics following the January 6, 2021, Capitol events, where mainstream media outlets and Democratic figures, including Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024, branded Donald Trump and his supporters as fascists, citing rhetoric on immigration and election integrity. However, historians argue this misapplies the term, as Trump's administration pursued deregulatory policies and operated within a multi-party system without establishing a paramilitary apparatus, suspending habeas corpus, or imposing total economic planning—hallmarks of fascism that subordinated private enterprise to state-directed syndicates. Fascism historian Stanley Payne argues that such labeling detaches the term from historical fascism's specific characteristics, such as the demand for a total societal overhaul or "anthropological revolution" remaking humanity through will, violence, and anti-egalitarian nationalism, and ignores profound post-1945 historical changes amid democratization that dissolved conditions for fascism. The application of the fascist label to Trump remains contested among historians; some, including Robert Paxton (who shifted views post-January 6, 2021), Timothy Snyder, and Federico Finchelstein, argue it captures relevant traits like authoritarianism and challenges to democratic norms, though they often distinguish from full historical fascism. Trump's emphasis on individualism and market freedoms contrasts with fascism's collectivist mobilization for national rebirth through violence, rendering the label inaccurate despite superficial parallels like charismatic appeals. Similar misapplications appear in European contexts, where parties prioritizing border security or cultural preservation, such as Hungary's Fidesz under Viktor Orbán, face fascism accusations from outlets like The Guardian and EU officials. These claims overlook how such governments maintain competitive elections, independent judiciaries (albeit pressured), and opposition media, diverging from fascism's one-party monopoly and ritualized mass violence. Critics from left-leaning institutions, prone to framing nationalism itself as proto-fascist, amplify these labels, but empirical assessments show no evidence of fascist-style purges or imperial conquests; instead, policies reflect democratic nationalism within constitutional bounds. This pattern reflects a bias in academic and media sources, which often prioritize ideological conformity over rigorous historical comparison, as evidenced by the scarcity of fascist traits like eugenic laws or wartime economies in these cases. The consequences of these misapplications include desensitization to genuine fascist revival risks, such as neo-fascist fringes in Ukraine's Azov Battalion or Russia's Wagner Group, which exhibit militarized hierarchies and expansionist ideologies closer to original models. By inflating the term, discourse shifts from causal analysis—e.g., fascism's roots in interwar economic collapse and anti-communist reaction—to partisan hyperbole, undermining public vigilance against true authoritarianism. Historians like Paul Gottfried warn that this "fatal dance" of antifascist labeling distracts from liberalism's own erosions, like censorship trends in tech platforms, which echo illiberalism without fascist totality.

Defenses Against Equating Fascism with Conservatism

Conservative thinkers maintain that fascism represents a revolutionary ideology antithetical to traditional conservatism's emphasis on gradual evolution, institutional continuity, and restraint on state power. Edmund Burke's foundational critique of the French Revolution, which warned against abstract ideologies uprooting organic social orders, prefigures conservatism's opposition to fascism's radical restructuring of society under a totalitarian vanguard. In contrast, fascist doctrine, as outlined by Giovanni Gentile and Benito Mussolini in 1932, explicitly rejects liberal-conservative individualism in favor of the state's ethical primacy, where "everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state" supplants inherited liberties. Historically, fascist movements positioned themselves against conservative establishments, viewing them as decadent relics obstructing national rebirth. In Italy, Mussolini's Blackshirts targeted not only socialists but also liberal-conservative elites, culminating in the 1922 March on Rome that dismantled the existing parliamentary order dominated by conservative monarchists and Catholics. Similarly, in Germany, the Nazis under Hitler clashed with traditional conservatives like Franz von Papen, whom they later marginalized after the 1933 Enabling Act, purging conservative influences through events like the 1934 Night of the Long Knives to consolidate Führerprinzip over monarchical or aristocratic traditions. Historian Stanley G. Payne notes that fascism's alliances with the right were tactical and tenuous, with fascists often scorning conservatives as insufficiently dynamic or committed to mythic renewal. Ideologically, conservatism prioritizes decentralized authority, property rights, and moral order derived from religion and custom, whereas fascism enforces centralized control, mass mobilization, and a cult of action over reflection. Roger Scruton argued that fascism's totalizing impulse aligns more with leftist utopias than conservatism's skepticism of grand designs, as conservatives defend the "little platoons" of civil society against state absolutism. Fascist economics, blending syndicalism with state direction—as in Italy's 1927 Charter of Labor—subordinated markets to autarkic goals, diverging from conservatism's endorsement of free enterprise and Burkean economic prudence. This distinction holds empirically: fascist regimes nationalized key industries and imposed wage controls, outcomes conservatives historically resisted, as evidenced by Allied conservative leaders like Winston Churchill opposing such interventions during World War II. Equating the two overlooks fascism's modernist cult of violence and youth, which scorned conservative veneration for age, hierarchy, and compromise. Mussolini glorified perpetual struggle and rejected parliamentary conservatism as bourgeois weakness, while Hitler's Mein Kampf derided traditional German conservatism for failing to forge a volkisch revolution. Defenders like David Limbaugh emphasize that conservatism's commitment to constitutional limits and individual rights—core to figures like Russell Kirk—renders it incompatible with fascism's Führerstaat, where law yields to the leader's will. Scholarly analyses, such as those by Payne, reinforce that fascism's syncretic radicalism borrowed rhetorically from the right but executed a leftist-style purge of pluralism, making the conflation not only ahistorical but analytically flawed.

Lessons from Fascist Collapse and Allied Victory

The collapse of fascist regimes in Italy and Germany during World War II stemmed primarily from strategic overextension, resource shortages, and internal fractures exacerbated by authoritarian rigidity. Mussolini's Italy fell first, with the Grand Council of Fascism voting to remove him on July 25, 1943, amid the Allied invasion of Sicily and mounting military failures in North Africa, where Italian forces suffered over 250,000 casualties by May 1943. Nazi Germany's defeat followed by May 1945, driven by the failure of the 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union, which opened a second front and depleted resources, with German losses exceeding 5 million soldiers by war's end. A core lesson was the peril of multi-front warfare and ideological overconfidence, as fascist leaders underestimated enemy resilience and overestimated blitzkrieg efficacy. Hitler's decision to invade the USSR on June 22, 1941, while still engaged in the West, diverted 3 million troops eastward, leading to the loss of Army Group Center at Stalingrad by February 1943, where 91,000 Germans surrendered. Mussolini's opportunistic entry into war against France on June 10, 1940, despite inadequate preparation—Italy's army lacked modern equipment and training—exposed similar miscalculations, resulting in defeats like the Greek campaign of 1940-1941. These errors reflected fascism's emphasis on rapid conquest over sustainable logistics, contrasting with Allied pragmatic sequencing of operations, such as prioritizing the European theater before full Pacific commitment. Economically, fascist autarky and war mobilization proved inefficient against Allied industrial superiority. Germany's economy, initially under-mobilized until 1943, produced only 15,000 aircraft in 1942 compared to the Allies' combined 100,000-plus annually by 1944, hampered by resource scarcity—oil production never exceeded 6 million tons yearly against needs of 20 million. Italy's pre-war GDP per capita stagnated under corporatism, yielding inferior output like 2,000 aircraft total during the war. Allied victory hinged on superior production, fueled by U.S. entry after December 7, 1941, which provided Lend-Lease aid totaling $50 billion, enabling Soviet tank output to surpass Germany's 4:1 by 1943. This underscored how fascist central planning stifled innovation and adaptability, while Allied coalitions leveraged democratic incentives and global supply chains. Militarily, the Allies' command of air and sea domains isolated Axis forces, a lesson in the decisiveness of combined arms dominance. By 1943, Allied air superiority—achieved through 10:1 fighter ratios over Europe—destroyed German synthetic fuel plants, reducing aviation fuel by 90% by 1944. Naval blockades starved Italy of 80% of its oil imports by 1941, crippling mechanized units. Fascist regimes' failure to invest early in strategic bombing or antisubmarine warfare, coupled with Hitler's micromanagement—e.g., diverting resources to V-2 rockets yielding negligible impact—highlighted the risks of personalized dictatorship over professional general staffs. Allied intelligence breakthroughs, like Ultra codebreaking, provided foreknowledge of Axis moves, contributing to victories at El Alamein (October 1942) and Midway (June 1942). Ideologically, fascist racial doctrines diverted critical resources and fostered isolation. The Holocaust and eugenic programs consumed manpower equivalent to 500,000 soldiers for guarding camps and extermination, while alienating occupied populations in the East, fueling partisan warfare that tied down 500,000 German troops by 1944. In Italy, suppression of dissent eroded elite loyalty, culminating in King Victor Emmanuel III's arrest of Mussolini. Allied cohesion, despite ideological differences, allowed flexible grand strategy, as at Casablanca (January 1943), where unconditional surrender was demanded, denying Axis negotiation leverage. These outcomes demonstrate that totalitarian unity masked brittleness, vulnerable to attrition, whereas coalition resilience and empirical adaptation prevailed.

Legacy and Influence

Post-World War II Denazification and Anti-Fascism

Denazification was the Allied policy initiated in 1945 to eradicate Nazi ideology and personnel from German and Austrian public life, encompassing the removal of Nazi Party and SS members from positions of authority, the dissolution of related organizations, and efforts at societal re-education. Implemented across the four occupation zones—American, British, French, and Soviet—it involved mandatory questionnaires for adults over 18 to assess Nazi involvement, categorizing individuals as major offenders (subject to trials), lesser offenders, followers, or exonerated, with penalties ranging from internment to fines and loss of voting rights. Between 1945 and 1950, over 400,000 Germans were interned in camps as part of this process, alongside high-profile proceedings like the Nuremberg Trials (1945–1946), which prosecuted 24 leading Nazis and established precedents for crimes against humanity. In the Western zones, denazification began rigorously, with the U.S. zone processing millions via military tribunals and purging about 3.6% of the population from civil service by 1946, but its intensity declined amid reconstruction needs and the emerging Cold War, leading to amnesties under the 1949 Persilschein scheme allowing affidavits to mitigate past affiliations. By 1951, the policy formally ended, with critics noting its superficial nature: approximately 90% of civil servants were eventually reinstated, including former Nazis in key roles, as pragmatic governance trumped ideological purity, enabling economic recovery but fostering debates over incomplete accountability. In the Soviet zone, denazification served dual purposes—eliminating Nazism while consolidating communist control—resulting in harsher purges of non-communist elements, though it too faltered as East Germany prioritized building a socialist state, with many lower-level Nazis absorbed into the new regime. Parallel to denazification, post-war anti-fascism emerged as a broader ideological framework, rooted in wartime resistance networks but adapted to peacetime contexts, particularly in Europe where communist-led groups framed opposition to fascism as synonymous with anti-capitalism. In Eastern Europe, including the German Democratic Republic established in 1949, anti-fascism became state doctrine, with organizations like Antifa organs monitoring and suppressing perceived fascist remnants, often extending to any anti-communist activity, as evidenced by purges that eliminated over 100,000 suspected collaborators in Poland and Hungary by 1948. Western anti-fascist efforts, such as Italy's 1946 purges removing 10,000 fascists from public office under the Togliatti amnesty, focused on preventing fascist revival amid partisan violence, but faced suppression of militant groups during the Red Scare, with U.S. authorities interning 11,000 suspected radicals under the Smith Act from 1948 onward. The interplay of denazification and anti-fascism yielded mixed outcomes: while Nazi Party membership dropped from 8.5 million in 1945 to negligible organized activity by the 1950s, preventing a immediate resurgence, latent sympathies persisted, as shown by surveys indicating 12% of West Germans in 1950 still viewed Hitler positively, underscoring the limits of top-down purges without deeper cultural shifts. In Austria, a 1946 law mirrored German efforts but was laxer, convicting only 1% of applicants as Nazis, reflecting national victim narratives over complicity. These processes highlighted causal tensions between punitive justice and functional reconstruction, with Cold War divisions accelerating leniency in the West to counter Soviet influence, ultimately prioritizing democratic stability over exhaustive reckoning.

Neo-Fascist Movements

Neo-fascist movements arose in Europe following the defeat of Axis powers in 1945, characterized by efforts to perpetuate fascist tenets such as ultra-nationalism, corporatism, and anti-communism within democratic systems constrained by anti-fascist laws. These groups typically rejected liberal democracy's emphasis on individualism and multiculturalism, instead advocating hierarchical social orders and national rebirth, often while disavowing explicit ties to historical fascism to evade bans. Unlike interwar fascism, neo-fascism operated in fragmented, electoral, or subcultural forms, with limited success due to widespread stigma and legal barriers, though it influenced broader far-right populism in some cases. In Italy, the Movimento Sociale Italiano (MSI), established on December 26, 1946, by ex-members of Benito Mussolini's Republican Fascist Party, emerged as the archetype of organized neo-fascism, securing parliamentary seats and voter shares up to 8.7% in the 1968 general election through appeals to nostalgia for fascist social policies and anti-communist fervor. The MSI maintained ideological continuity with fascism via symbols like the tricolor flame but moderated rhetoric to participate in coalitions, eventually transforming into the National Alliance in 1995, which diluted overt neo-fascist elements. Contemporary groups like CasaPound Italia, founded in 2003 as a fascist-inspired social movement providing housing and aid to evoke Mussolini-era solidarity, blend neo-fascist aesthetics—such as Roman imperial references—with anti-immigration activism and direct action, achieving minor electoral breakthroughs like a 2017 municipal council seat in Ostia despite legal challenges under Italy's anti-fascist legislation. Beyond Italy, neo-fascist activity manifested in Britain through the National Front, formed in 1967 by merging smaller fascist splinter groups, which promoted racial nationalism and repatriation policies, drawing peak support of 0.6% in the 1979 general election amid economic discontent and immigration debates. In Greece, Golden Dawn, originating as a fringe publication in 1983 but surging electorally during the 2009-2015 debt crisis, captured 21 seats and 6.97% of the vote in the May 2012 parliamentary election by deploying paramilitary squads for anti-migrant violence and invoking Nazi symbolism, before its designation as a criminal organization in October 2020 following convictions for murders and racketeering involving leadership like Nikos Michaloliakos. These movements' trajectories highlight causal factors like economic instability and perceived cultural threats fueling recruitment, yet their marginalization—via prosecutions, voter backlash, and ideological dilution—demonstrates the enduring institutional rejection of fascist revival post-1945.

Scholarly Reassessments in Recent Decades

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, historians and political theorists, including A. James Gregor, have reevaluated fascism's ideological foundations, tracing its emergence not from conservative traditions but from revisionist strains of Marxism and revolutionary syndicalism prevalent in early 20th-century Europe. Gregor, in analyses spanning from The Ideology of Fascism (1969) to Mussolini's Intellectuals (2005), posits that Italian Fascism constituted a "developmental dictatorship" adapted for nations undergoing industrialization, drawing on Marxist developmental theory while rejecting class internationalism in favor of national solidarity. This perspective highlights Benito Mussolini's background as a socialist editor expelled from the Italian Socialist Party in 1914 for supporting World War I intervention, yet retaining core collectivist principles like state-directed economic coordination through corporatism, which subordinated private enterprise to national goals without full nationalization. Empirical studies have further supported this reassessment by linking fascism's rise to the perceived threat of orthodox socialism rather than right-wing backlash alone. Daron Acemoglu, Tarek Hassan, and James Robinson's 2011 Quarterly Journal of Economics paper demonstrates, through cross-regional data from interwar Europe, that fascist vote shares correlated positively with prior socialist electoral strength and wartime radicalization, suggesting fascism functioned as a nationalist counter-mobilization against Bolshevik-style revolutions, as evidenced by higher fascist support in areas with strong communist parties post-1917. This causal dynamic underscores fascism's collectivist ethos—emphasizing total state oversight of production and labor, akin to Soviet planning but framed in ethno-national terms—over laissez-faire capitalism, which fascists derided as decadent. Such reinterpretations, echoed by Richard Pipes in viewing fascism and Bolshevism as "heretical" offshoots of socialism, challenge the post-World War II academic consensus equating fascism exclusively with reactionary nationalism, often influenced by leftist historiographical dominance in Western universities. While mainstream narratives persist, these reassessments, grounded in primary fascist texts like Giovanni Gentile's actualist philosophy prioritizing collective spiritual mobilization, reveal fascism's syncretic rejection of both liberal individualism and Marxist class warfare, positioning it as a modernizing ideology with statist roots shared across totalitarian spectra. Critics of this view, including some Marxist scholars, concede the overlap in anti-capitalist rhetoric but attribute fascism's appeal to bourgeois fears of proletarian upheaval, yet Gregor's archival work on fascist intellectuals substantiates the developmentalist continuity from Sorelian syndicalism to Mussolini's 1932 Doctrine of Fascism.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.