Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Online shopping
View on Wikipedia

| E-commerce |
|---|
| Digital content |
| Retail goods and services |
| Online shopping |
| Mobile commerce |
| Customer service |
| E-procurement |
| Purchase-to-pay |
| Super-apps |
| Internet |
|---|
|
|
Online shopping is a form of electronic commerce which allows consumers to directly buy goods or services from a seller over the Internet using a web browser or a mobile app. Consumers find a product of interest by visiting the website of the retailer directly or by searching among alternative vendors using a shopping search engine, which displays the same product's availability and pricing at different e-retailers. As of 2020,[update] customers can shop online using a range of different computers and devices, including desktop computers, laptops, tablet computers and smartphones.
Online stores that evoke the physical analogy of buying products or services at a regular "brick-and-mortar" retailer or shopping center follow a process called business-to-consumer (B2C) online shopping. When an online store is set up to enable businesses to buy from another business, the process is instead called business-to-business (B2B) online shopping. A typical online store enables the customer to browse the firm's range of products and services, view photos or images of the products, along with information about the product specifications, features and prices. Unlike physical stores which may close at night, online shopping portals are always available to customers.
Online stores usually enable shoppers to use "search" features to find specific models, brands or items. Online customers must have access to the Internet and a valid method of payment in order to complete a transaction, such as a credit card, an Interac-enabled debit card, or a service such as PayPal. For physical products (e.g., paperback books or clothes), the e-tailer ships the products to the customer; for digital products, such as digital audio files of songs or software, the e-tailer usually sends the file to the customer over the Internet. The largest of these online retailing corporations are Alibaba, Amazon.com, and eBay.[1]
Terminology
[edit]Alternative names for the activity are "e-commerce", a shortened form of "electronic commerce" or "e-shopping", a shortened form of "electronic shopping". An online store may also be called an e-web-store, e-shop, e-store, Internet shop, web-shop, web-store, online store, online storefront and virtual store. Mobile commerce (or m-commerce) describes purchasing from an online retailer's mobile device-optimized website or software application ("app"). These websites or apps are designed to enable customers to browse through a companies' products and services on tablet computers and smartphones.[citation needed]
History
[edit]History of online shopping
[edit]One of the earliest forms of trade conducted online was IBM's online transaction processing (OLTP) developed in the 1960s, which allowed the processing of financial transactions in real-time.[2] The computerized ticket reservation system developed for American Airlines called Semi-Automatic Business Research Environment (SABRE) was one of its applications. There, computer terminals located in different travel agencies were linked to a large IBM mainframe computer, which processed transactions simultaneously and coordinated them so that all travel agents had access to the same information at the same time.[2] At some point between 1971 and 1972, students at Stanford and MIT used the internet precursor ARPANET to make a deal to exchange marijuana, but the interaction does not qualify as e-commerce because no money was transferred online.[3]
The landscape of online shopping as we know it today took shape with the rise of the Internet.[4] Initially serving as a mere advertising platform, the Internet transitioned swiftly into a dynamic space for actual online transactions. This transformation was fueled by the development of interactive web pages and secure transmission protocols,[5] marking a pivotal moment in 1994 with the first online sales of Sting's album, Ten Summoner's Tales.[6]
This milestone event set the stage for the diversification of online retail, with early adopters such as wine, chocolates, and flowers paving the way. These products became pioneers in the e-commerce realm, capturing the attention of a growing audience. Researchers identified a crucial factor for internet success – the suitability of products for online transactions.[7] Generic items that didn't necessitate physical interaction gained traction, propelling the online shopping trend forward.
In its nascent stages, online shopping faced a limited audience. The early adopters were predominantly affluent males aged 30 and above. However, this demographic landscape underwent significant changes over time, and the online shopping sphere became more inclusive.
Over the years, the United Kingdom has witnessed a substantial shift in consumer behavior, with online shopping accounting for a noteworthy percentage of retail transactions. The extent of this influence varies depending on the product category, highlighting the diverse ways in which consumers engage with online platforms.
Growth in online shoppers
[edit]As the revenues from online sales continued to grow significantly researchers identified different types of online shoppers, Rohm & Swaninathan[8] identified four categories and named them "convenience shoppers, variety seekers, balanced buyers, and store-oriented shoppers". They focused on shopping motivations and found that the variety of products available and the perceived convenience of the buying online experience were significant motivating factors. This was different for offline shoppers, who were more motivated by time saving and recreational motives.
English entrepreneur Michael Aldrich was a pioneer of online shopping in 1979. His system connected a modified domestic TV to a real-time transaction processing computer via a domestic telephone line. He believed that videotex, the modified domestic TV technology with a simple menu-driven human–computer interface, was a 'new, universally applicable, participative communication medium — the first since the invention of the telephone.' This enabled 'closed' corporate information systems to be opened to 'outside' correspondents not just for transaction processing but also for e-messaging and information retrieval and dissemination, later known as e-business.[9] His definition of the new mass communications medium as 'participative' [interactive, many-to-many] was fundamentally different from the traditional definitions of mass communication and mass media and a precursor to the social networking on the Internet 25 years later. In March 1980 he launched Redifon's Office Revolution, which allowed consumers, customers, agents, distributors, suppliers and service companies to be connected online to the corporate systems and allow business transactions to be completed electronically in real-time.[10] During the 1980s[11] he designed, manufactured, sold, installed, maintained and supported many online shopping systems, using videotex technology.[12] These systems which also provided voice response and handprint processing pre-date the Internet and the World Wide Web, the IBM PC, and Microsoft MS-DOS, and were installed mainly in the UK by large corporations.
The first World Wide Web server and browser, created by Tim Berners-Lee in 1989,[13] opened for commercial use in 1991.[14] Thereafter, subsequent technological innovations emerged in 1994: online banking, the opening of an online pizza shop by Pizza Hut,[14] Netscape's SSL v2 encryption standard for secure data transfer, and Intershop's first online shopping system. The first secure retail transaction over the Web was either by NetMarket or Internet Shopping Network in 1994.[15] Immediately after, Amazon.com launched its online shopping site in 1995 and eBay was also introduced in 1995.[14] Alibaba's sites Taobao and Tmall were launched in 2003 and 2008, respectively. Retailers are increasingly selling goods and services prior to availability through "pretail" for testing, building, and managing demand.[citation needed]
International statistics
[edit]Statistics show that in 2012, Asia-Pacific increased their international sales over 30% giving them over $433 billion in revenue. That is a $69 billion difference between the U.S. revenue of $364.66 billion. It is estimated that Asia-Pacific will increase by another 30% in the year 2013 putting them ahead by more than one-third of all global e-commerce sales.[needs update] The largest online shopping day in the world is Singles Day, with sales just in Alibaba's sites at US$9.3 billion in 2014.[16][17]
In 2018, 9.8% of all retail sales in the United States were made online.[18] In 2019, that figure was 2.8% in Canada.[19] In the United Kingdom, online sales peaked at 37.8% of all retail sales in January 2021, and were at 26.3% in January 2024.[20]
Customers
[edit]Online customers must have access to the Internet and a valid method of payment in order to complete a transaction. Generally, higher levels of education and personal income correspond to more favorable perceptions of shopping online. Increased exposure to technology also increases the probability of developing favorable attitudes towards new shopping channels.[21]
In addition, age is also a significant factor that affects online shopping.Culture can have a big effect on how shoppers trust reviews and make important decisions. People in different countries can respond differently to online information than someone from their own country.[22] On top of that, after the pandemic, it seems that more people are relying on online websites for things they used to buy in person at the store.[23] People feel that privacy and security factors have an even more significant impact on attitudes toward online shopping than product factors. Shoppers of different age groups have different perceptions of the risk factors of online shopping.[24]
Customer buying behaviour in digital environment
[edit]The marketing around the digital environment, customer's buying behaviour may not be influenced and controlled by the brand and firm, when they make a buying decision that might concern the interactions with search engine, recommendations, online reviews and other information. In modern shopping environments, people are more likely to use their mobile phones, computers, tablets and other digital devices to gather information. When people shop online, how risky they feel when purchasing an item plays a big role. Websites that offer secure payment options and good delivery systems make shoppers feel safer and more open to making a purchase.[25] Plus, the way reviews are presented with like the design of the site, layout, and pictures, will also really influence their decisions.[26] In an online shopping environment, interactive decision may have an influence on aid customer decision making, through online product reviews and user-generated content, typically provided through software from companies like Bazaarvoice and Trustpilot, or via social media.[27][28] This content, which can include text or video-based reviews, customer photos, and feedback, is often displayed alongside products being sold on websites like Amazon, Target, and most other digital storefronts.
Subsequently, risk and trust would also are two important factors affecting people's' behavior in digital environments. Customers consider to switch between e-channels, because they are mainly influence by the comparison with offline shopping, involving growth of security, financial and performance-risks In other words, a customer shopping online that they may receive more risk than people shopping in stores. There are three factors may influence people to do the buying decision, firstly, people cannot examine whether the product satisfy their needs and wants before they receive it. Secondly, customer may concern at after-sale services. Finally, customer may afraid that they cannot fully understand the language used in e-sales. Based on those factors customer perceive risk may as a significantly reason influence the online purchasing behaviour.[29]
Online retailers has place much emphasis on customer trust aspect, trust is another way driving customer's behaviour in digital environment, which can depend on customer's attitude and expectation. Indeed, the company's products design or ideas can not met customer's expectations. Customer's purchase intention based on rational expectations, and additionally impacts on emotional trust. Moreover, those expectations can be also establish on the product information and revision from others.[30]
In several studies, perceived value, shopping style, and brand trust are the main factors that affect online consumers' decisions.[31] The perceived value means that people can compare the products and prices online, bringing them the perceived value of getting more benefits online than in an offline store.[32] The comfortable environment that online shopping brings to customers can make consumers get more perceived value. In the end, E-commerce behavior is still mostly influenced by families that are receptive to new technologies, and to a lesser extent by efficiency concerns.[33]
Product selection
[edit]Consumers find a product of interest by visiting the website of the retailer directly or by searching among alternative vendors using a shopping search engine. Users can compare and evaluate products using product information on the website, as well on other websites such as websites about product tests.
Once a particular product has been found and selected on the website of the seller, most online retailers use shopping cart software to allow the consumer to accumulate multiple items and to adjust quantities, like filling a physical shopping cart or basket in a conventional store. A "checkout" process follows (continuing the physical-store analogy) in which payment and delivery information is collected, if necessary. Some stores allow consumers to sign up for a permanent online account so that some or all of this information only needs to be entered once. The consumer often receives an e-mail confirmation once the transaction is complete. Less sophisticated stores may rely on consumers to phone or e-mail their orders (although full credit card numbers, expiry date, and Card Security Code,[34] or bank account and routing number should not be accepted by e-mail, for reasons of security).
Impact of reviews on consumer behavior
[edit]One of the great benefits of online shopping is the ability to read product reviews, written either by experts or fellow online shoppers. The Nielsen Company conducted a survey in March 2010 and polled more than 27,000 Internet users in 55 markets from the Asia-Pacific, Europe, Middle East, North America, and South America to look at questions such as "How do consumers shop online?", "What do they intend to buy?", "How do they use various online shopping web pages?", and the impact of social media and other factors that come into play when consumers are trying to decide how to spend their money on which product or service. According to the research,[35] reviews on electronics (57%) such as DVD players, cellphones, or PlayStations, and so on, reviews on cars (45%), and reviews on software (37%) play an important role in influencing consumers who tend to make purchases online. Furthermore, 40% of online shoppers indicate that they would not even buy electronics without consulting online reviews first. Studies using eye-tracking can show how people pay attention to certain parts of reviews and product images, which can really show how and what they decide to get.[36] Other research shows that reviews that talk about certain prices, quality, and delivery tend to have a big impact on how customers tend to spend their money online.[37]
In addition to online reviews, peer recommendations on online shopping pages or social media websites play a key role[38] for online shoppers when they are researching future purchases.[39] 90% of all purchases made are influenced by social media.[40]
Payment
[edit]Online shoppers commonly use a credit card or a PayPal account in order to make payments. Having a safe and reliable payment process can be a great way to build trust. If people feel their money is secure and safe within the buying process, they will most likely purchase the product and feel comfortable about it.[41] However, some systems enable users to create accounts and pay by alternative means, such as:
- Billing to mobile phones and landlines[42][43]
- Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies
- Cash on delivery (C.O.D.)
- Cheque/ Check
- Debit card
- Direct debit in some countries
- Electronic money of various types
- Gift cards
- Invoice, especially popular in some markets/countries, such as Switzerland
- Postal money order
- Wire transfer/delivery on payment
Some online shops will not accept international credit cards. Some require both the purchaser's billing and shipping address to be in the same country as the online shop's base of operation. Other online shops allow customers from any country to send gifts anywhere. The financial part of a transaction may be processed in real time (e.g. letting the consumer know their credit card was declined before they log off), or may be done later as part of the fulfillment process.
Product delivery
[edit]
Once a payment has been accepted, the goods or services can be delivered in the following ways. For physical items:
- Package delivery: The product is shipped to a customer-designated address. Retail package delivery is typically done by the public postal system or a retail courier such as FedEx, UPS, DHL, or TNT.
- Drop shipping: The order is passed to the manufacturer or third-party distributor, who then ships the item directly to the consumer, bypassing the retailer's physical location to save time, money, and space.
- In-store pick-up: The customer selects a local store using a locator software and picks up the delivered product at the selected location. This is the method often used in the bricks and clicks business model.
For digital items or tickets:
- Downloading/Digital distribution:[44] The method often used for digital media products such as software, music, movies, or images.
- Printing out, provision of a code for, or e-mailing of such items as admission tickets and scrip (e.g., gift certificates and coupons). The tickets, codes, or coupons may be redeemed at the appropriate physical or online premises and their content reviewed to verify their eligibility (e.g., assurances that the right of admission or use is redeemed at the correct time and place, for the correct dollar amount, and for the correct number of uses).
- Will call, COBO (in Care Of Box Office), or "at the door" pickup: The patron picks up pre-purchased tickets for an event, such as a play, sporting event, or concert, either just before the event or in advance. With the onset of the Internet and e-commerce sites, which allow customers to buy tickets online, the popularity of this service has increased.
Shopping cart systems
[edit]Simple shopping cart systems allow the off-line administration of products and categories. The shop is then generated as HTML files and graphics that can be uploaded to a webspace. The systems do not use an online database.[45] A high-end solution can be bought or rented as a stand-alone program or as an addition to an enterprise resource planning program. It is usually installed on the company's web server and may integrate into the existing supply chain so that ordering, payment, delivery, accounting and warehousing can be automated to a large extent. Other solutions allow the user to register and create an online shop on a portal that hosts multiple shops simultaneously from one back office. Examples are BigCommerce, Shopify and FlickRocket. Open source shopping cart packages include advanced platforms such as Interchange, and off-the-shelf solutions such as Magento, osCommerce, WooCommerce, PrestaShop, and Zen Cart. Commercial systems can also be tailored so the shop does not have to be created from scratch. By using an existing framework, software modules for various functionalities required by a web shop can be adapted and combined.[46]
Design
[edit]Customers are attracted to online shopping not only because of high levels of convenience, but also because of broader selections, competitive pricing, and greater access to information.[47][48] Business organizations seek to offer online shopping not only because it is of much lower cost compared to bricks and mortar stores, but also because it offers access to a worldwide market, increases customer value, and builds sustainable capabilities.[49][50]
Information load
[edit]Designers of online shops are concerned with the effects of information load. Information load is a product of the spatial and temporal arrangements of stimuli in the web store.[51] Compared with conventional retail shopping, the information environment of virtual shopping is enhanced by providing additional product information such as comparative products and services, as well as various alternatives and attributes of each alternative, etc.[52] Two major dimensions of information load are complexity and novelty.[53] Complexity refers to the number of different elements or features of a site, often the result of increased information diversity. Novelty involves the unexpected, suppressed, new, or unfamiliar aspects of the site. The novelty dimension may keep consumers exploring a shopping site, whereas the complexity dimension may induce impulse purchases.[52]
Consumer needs and expectations
[edit]Internet consumers are self-conscious and emphasize personalized consumption, which makes the demand for online consumption different. Online consumers have different needs depending on their time and environment. Even different online consumers have different needs at the same level of demand due to the difference in income level and other factors. Compared with the centralized nature of traditional markets, online consumption is more decentralized. In the online consumer market, consumers have a short decision time, a large variability of consumer demand, a large number of purchases, but a relatively small amount of each purchase, a considerable mobility of purchases, a strong substitutability of goods, and a large elasticity of demand.[54] According to the output of a research report by Western Michigan University published in 2005, an e-commerce website does not have to be good looking with listing on a lot of search engines. It must build relationships with customers to make money. The report also suggests that a website must leave a positive impression on the customers, giving them a reason to come back.[55] How people tend to shop and how much they trust a company or brand are all very important factors that can either make or break whether a person buys online.[56] If sites can give good product info, good visuals, and good, reliable reviews, they can make their online shoppers feel safer and overall persuade them to purchase something.[57] However, resent research[58] has proven that sites with higher focus on efficiency, convenience, and personalised services increased the customers motivation to make purchases.
Dyn, an Internet performance management company conducted a survey on more than 1400 consumers across 11 countries in North America, Europe, Middle-East and Asia and the results of the survey are as follows:
- Online retailers must improve the website speed
- Online retailers must ease consumers fear around security
These concerns majorly affect the decisions of almost two thirds of the consumers.[59]
User interface
[edit]
The most important factors determining whether customers return to a website are ease of use and the presence of user-friendly features.[60] Usability testing is important for finding problems and improvements in a web site. Methods for evaluating usability include heuristic evaluation, cognitive walkthrough, and user testing. Each technique has its own characteristics and emphasizes different aspects of the user experience.[60]
Market share
[edit]The popularity of online shopping continues to erode sales of conventional retailers. For example, Best Buy, the largest retailer of electronics in the U.S. in August 2014 reported its tenth consecutive quarterly dip in sales, citing an increasing shift by consumers to online shopping.[61] Amazon.com has the largest market share in the United States. As of May 2018, a survey found two-thirds of Americans had bought something from Amazon (92% of those who had bought anything online), with 40% of online shoppers buying something from Amazon at least once a month. The survey found shopping began at amazon.com 44% of the time, compared to a general search engine at 33%. It estimated 75 million Americans subscribe to Amazon Prime and 35 million more use someone else's account.[62]
There were 242 million people shopping online in China in 2012.[63] For developing countries and low-income households in developed countries, adoption of e-commerce in place of or in addition to conventional methods is limited by a lack of affordable Internet access.
Advantages
[edit]Convenience
[edit]Online stores are usually available 24 hours a day, and many consumers in Western countries have Internet access both at work and at home. Other establishments such as Internet cafes, community centers and schools provide internet access as well. In contrast, visiting a conventional retail store requires travel or commuting and costs such as gas, parking, or bus tickets, and must usually take place during business hours. Delivery was always a problem which affected the convenience of online shopping. Additionally, the online shopping industry has not only involved the concept of providing convenience for customers but also improved perceptions of social inclusion.[64] However to overcome this many retailers including online retailers in Taiwan brought in a store pick up service. This now meant that customers could purchase goods online and pick them up at a nearby convenience store, making online shopping more advantageous to customers.[65] In the event of a problem with the item (e.g., the product was not what the consumer ordered or the product was not satisfactory), consumers are concerned with the ease of returning an item in exchange for the correct product or a refund. Consumers may need to contact the retailer, visit the post office and pay return shipping, and then wait for a replacement or refund. Some online companies have more generous return policies to compensate for the traditional advantage of physical stores. For example, the online shoe retailer Zappos.com includes labels for free return shipping, and does not charge a restocking fee, even for returns which are not the result of merchant error. (Note: In the United Kingdom, online shops are prohibited from charging a restocking fee if the consumer cancels their order in accordance with the Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Act 2000).[66] A 2018 survey in the United States found 26% of online shoppers said they never return items, and another 65% said they rarely do so.[67] Merchants may benefit from online shopping due to low sales inventory pressure, low operating costs, and the scale of operation is not limited by the site.
Delivery
[edit]Especially in cases of large or heavy products, delivery can be not only more convenient but also not require having or using a car. Not using or depending on personal vehicles, which can have substantial impact on the environment, to travel to local stores can make online shopping more sustainable than buying in local stores if such are used otherwise[68] (especially if items are bundled[68] and delivery vehicles are electric and use optimized routes). Moreover, the pace of urbanization, local delivery systems, and internet connectivity which facilitate the delivery process are the major determinants of e-commerce adoption,
Information and reviews
[edit]Online shopping is usually more informationally rich than shopping at physical stores traveled to and usually has higher comparability and customizability.[69]
Online stores must describe products for sale with text, photos, and multimedia files, and sometimes have features such as question and answers or filters, whereas in a physical retail store, the actual product and the manufacturer's packaging will be available for direct inspection (which might involve a test drive, fitting, or other experimentation). Some online stores provide or link to supplemental product information, such as instructions, safety procedures, demonstrations, or manufacturer specifications. Research shows that when consumers are looking at reviews, they pay attention to both the text and the picture of the product. Positive reviews and well-organized information can make people feel comfortable in themselves as a buyer and comfortable in the website or company they are shopping with.[70] Some provide background information, advice, or how-to guides designed to help consumers decide which product to buy. Some stores even allow customers to comment or rate their items. There are also dedicated review sites that host user reviews for different products. Reviews and even some blogs give customers the option of shopping for cheaper purchases from all over the world without having to depend on local retailers. In a conventional retail store, clerks are generally available to answer questions. Some online stores have real-time chat features, but most rely on e-mails or phone calls to handle customer questions. Even if an online store is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, the customer service team may only be available during regular business hours. It also implies that geographical factors, rather than socioeconomic issues, must be addressed in order to improve online shopping acceptance.[71]
Price and selection
[edit]One advantage of shopping online is being able to quickly seek out deals for items or services provided by many different vendors (though some local search engines do exist to help consumers locate products for sale in nearby stores). Search engines, online price comparison services and discovery shopping engines can be used to look up sellers of a particular product or service. Shipping costs (if applicable) reduce the price advantage of online merchandise, though depending on the jurisdiction, a lack of sales tax may compensate for this. Shipping a small number of items, especially from another country, is much more expensive than making the larger shipments bricks-and-mortar retailers order. Some retailers (especially those selling small, high-value items like electronics) offer free shipping on sufficiently large orders. Another major advantage for retailers is the ability to rapidly switch suppliers and vendors without disrupting users' shopping experience.
Disadvantages
[edit]Fraud and security concerns
[edit]Given the lack of ability to inspect merchandise before purchase, consumers are at higher risk of fraud than face-to-face transactions. When ordering merchandise online, the item may not work properly, it may have defects, or it might not be the same item pictured in the online photo. Merchants also risk fraudulent purchases if customers are using stolen credit cards or fraudulent repudiation of the online purchase. However, merchants face less risk from physical theft by using a warehouse instead of a retail storefront. Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) encryption has generally solved the problem of credit card numbers being intercepted in transit between the consumer and the merchant. However, one must still trust the merchant (and employees) not to use the credit card information subsequently for their own purchases, and not to pass the information to others. Also, hackers might break into a merchant's web site and steal names, addresses and credit card numbers, although the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard is intended to minimize the impact of such breaches. Identity theft is still a concern for consumers. A number of high-profile break-ins in the 2000s has prompted some U.S. states to require disclosure to consumers when this happens. Computer security has thus become a major concern for merchants and e-commerce service providers, who deploy countermeasures such as firewalls and anti-virus software to protect their networks. Phishing is another danger, where consumers are fooled into thinking they are dealing with a reputable retailer, when they have actually been manipulated into feeding private information to a system operated by a malicious party. Denial of service attacks are a minor risk for merchants, as are server and network outages.
Quality seals can be placed on the Shop web page if it has undergone an independent assessment and meets all requirements of the company issuing the seal. The purpose of these seals is to increase the confidence of online shoppers. However, the existence of many different seals, or seals unfamiliar to consumers, may foil this effort to a certain extent.
A number of resources offer advice on how consumers can protect themselves when using online retailer services. These include:
- Sticking with well-known stores, or attempting to find independent consumer reviews of their experiences; also ensuring that there is comprehensive contact information on the website before using the service, and noting if the retailer has enrolled in industry oversight programs such as a trust mark or a trust seal.
- Before buying from a new company, evaluating the website by considering issues such as: the professionalism and user-friendliness of the site; whether or not the company lists a telephone number and/or street address along with e-contact information; whether a fair and reasonable refund and return policy is clearly stated; and whether there are hidden price inflators, such as excessive shipping and handling charges.
- Ensuring that the retailer has an acceptable privacy policy posted. For example, note if the retailer does not explicitly state that it will not share private information with others without consent.
- Ensuring that the vendor address is protected with SSL (see above) when entering credit card information. If it does the address on the credit card information entry screen will start with "HTTPS".
- Using strong passwords which do not contain personal information such as the user's name or birthdate. Another option is a "pass phrase," which might be something along the lines: "I shop 4 good a buy!!" These are difficult to hack, since they do not consist of words found in a dictionary, and provides a variety of upper, lower, and special characters. These passwords can be site specific and may be easy to remember.
Although the benefits of online shopping are considerable, when the process goes poorly it can create a thorny situation. A few problems that shoppers potentially face include identity theft, faulty products, and the accumulation of spyware. If users are required to put in their credit card information and billing/shipping address and the website is not secure, customer information can be accessible to anyone who knows how to obtain it. Most large online corporations are inventing new ways to make fraud more difficult. However, criminals are constantly responding to these developments with new ways to manipulate the system. Even though online retailers are making efforts to protect consumer information, it is a constant fight to maintain the lead. It is advisable to be aware of the most current technology and scams to protect consumer identity and finances. Product delivery is also a main concern of online shopping. Most companies offer shipping insurance in case the product is lost or damaged. Some shipping companies will offer refunds or compensation for the damage, but this is up to their discretion.
Fencing
[edit]Fencing is another growing societal problem associated with online platforms.[72] Stolen merchandise from brick and mortal retailers and cargo are easily resold to the public through third party marketplaces due to lack of accountability and regulation by online operators.[73] In the United States alone, businesses are facing the brunt of organized retail crime with the value of stolen goods amounting to $68.8 billion in 2021 (equivalent to 1.47% of all sales or $214 per capita nationwide). These goods are typically passed off as legitimate, and resold online to unsuspecting buyers.[74]
Lack of full cost disclosure
[edit]The lack of full cost disclosure may also be problematic. While it may be easy to compare the base price of an item online, it may not be easy to see the total cost up front. Additional fees such as shipping are often not visible until the final step in the checkout process. The problem is especially evident with cross-border purchases, where the cost indicated at the final checkout screen may not include additional fees that must be paid upon delivery such as duties and brokerage. Some services such as the Canadian-based Wishabi attempts to include estimates of these additional cost,[75] but nevertheless, the lack of general full cost disclosure remains a concern.
Privacy
[edit]Privacy of personal information is a significant issue for some consumers. Many consumers wish to avoid spam and telemarketing which could result from supplying contact information to an online merchant. In response, many merchants promise to not use consumer information for these purposes, Many websites keep track of consumer shopping habits in order to suggest items and other websites to view. Brick-and-mortar stores also collect consumer information. Some ask for a shopper's address and phone number at checkout, though consumers may refuse to provide it. Many larger stores use the address information encoded on consumers' credit cards (often without their knowledge) to add them to a catalog mailing list. This information is obviously not accessible to the merchant when paying in cash or through a bank (money transfer, in which case there is also proof of payment).
Aggregation
[edit]High-volume websites, such as Yahoo!, Amazon.com and eBay offer hosting services for online stores to all size retailers. These stores are presented within an integrated navigation framework, sometimes known as virtual shopping malls or online marketplaces.
See also
[edit]- Bricks and clicks business model
- Dark store
- Digital distribution
- Electronic business
- E-commerce
- Online auction business model
- Online music store
- Online pharmacy
- Online shopping malls
- Online shopping rewards
- Package delivery
- Personal shopper
- Product tracing systems: allow to see source factory of a product
- Retail therapy
- Types of retail outlets
References
[edit]- ^ "The Alibaba phenomenon". The Economics. March 23, 2013.
- ^ a b Lambert, Laura (2005). The Internet: A Historical Encyclopedia: Chronology. Vol. 3, Volume 3. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. p. 100. ISBN 978-1-85109-659-6.
- ^ Magazine, Smithsonian; Fessenden, Marissa. "What Was the First Thing Sold on the Internet?". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2022-03-25.
- ^ Botha, J.; Bothma, C.; Geldenhuys, P. (2008). Managing E-commerce in Business. Cape Town: Juta and Company Ltd. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-7021-7304-2.
- ^ Zinkan, George (2011). Advertising Research: The Internet, Consumer Behavior, and Strategy. Chicago: American Marketing Association. p. 33. ISBN 978-1-61311-271-7.
- ^ "Shop Direct celebrates 20 years of online shopping". Shopdirect.com. 2014-08-11. Archived from the original on 2018-02-07. Retrieved 2016-12-12.
- ^ Doherty, N.F.; Ellis-Chadwick, F.; Hart, C.A. (1999). "Cyber retailing in the UK: the potential of the Internet as a retail channel". International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 27 (1): 22–36. doi:10.1108/09590559910252685. S2CID 55847148.
- ^ Rohm, Andrew J; Swaminathan, Vanitha (2004-07-01). "A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations". Journal of Business Research. Marketing on the web – behavioral, strategy and practices and public policy. 57 (7): 748–757. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00351-X.
- ^ "1982 Videotex Communications, Collected Papers Aldrich Archive, University of Brighton December 1982" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-11-27. Retrieved 2014-01-07.
- ^ "1980 TV paves the way for Information Brokerage, Minicomputer News p. 12 London May 1980, the most comprehensive report of the March 1980 Press Conference launching the Redifon R 1800/50 computer system. Is 'Information Brokerage' aka 'browser industry'?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-01. Retrieved 2014-01-07.
- ^ "2011 M. Aldrich 'Online Shopping in the 1980s' IEEE 'Annals of the History of Computing' Vol 33 No4 pp57-61 October–December 2011 ISSN 1058-6180" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-11-18. Retrieved 2014-01-07.
- ^ "1980 Checking on the check-outs, Financial Times London 12 July 1980" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2014.
- ^ Berners-Lee, T.; Dimitroyannis, Dimitri; Mallinckrodt, A. John; McKay, Susan (1994). "World Wide Web". Computers in Physics. 8 (3): 298. Bibcode:1994ComPh...8..298B. doi:10.1063/1.4823300.
- ^ a b c Palmer, Kimberly.(2007) News & World Report.
- ^ Gilber, Alorie (11 August 2004). "E-commerce turns 10". CNet. Archived from the original on 29 October 2014. Retrieved 29 October 2014.
- ^ C. Custer (October 14, 2014). "Tmall CEO: this year, Alibaba plans to take Singles Day global". Tech in Asia. Retrieved December 5, 2014.
- ^ Steven Millward (November 12, 2014). "New record for world's biggest shopping day as Alibaba's shoppers spend $9.3 billion in 24 hours". Tech in Asia. Retrieved December 5, 2014.
- ^ "E-Commerce Retail Sales as a Percent of Total Sales [ECOMPCTSA]". U.S. Bureau of the Census retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 19 November 2018. Retrieved 25 January 2019.
- ^ "Table 20-10-0072-01 Retail E-commerce sales, unadjusted (x 1,000)". Statistics Canada. 15 January 2019. Retrieved 25 January 2019.
- ^ "Table Internet sales as a percentage of total retail sales (ratio) (%)". Office of National Statistics. 18 January 2019. Retrieved 29 February 2024.
- ^ Bigne, Enrique (2005). "The Impact of Internet User Shopping Patterns and Demographics on Consumer Mobile Buying Behavior" (PDF). Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 6 (3). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-09-28. Retrieved 2013-03-24.
- ^ Peña-García, Nathalie; Gil-Saura, Irene; Rodríguez-Orejuela, Augusto; Siqueira-Junior, José Ribamar (2020-06-01). "Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: A cross-cultural approach". Heliyon. 6 (6) e04284. Bibcode:2020Heliy...604284P. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04284. ISSN 2405-8440. PMC 7322128. PMID 32613132.
- ^ Inoue, Hiroyasu; Todo, Yasuyuki (2023-01-16). "Has Covid-19 permanently changed online purchasing behavior?". EPJ Data Science. 12 (1) 1. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00375-1. ISSN 2193-1127. PMC 9841963. PMID 36684117.
- ^ Makhitha, Khathutshelo M.; Ngobeni, Kate (2021-02-22). "The influence of demographic factors on perceived risks affecting attitude towards online shopping". SA Journal of Information Management. 23 (1). doi:10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1283. ISSN 1560-683X.
- ^ Phamthi, Van Anh; Nagy, Ákos; Ngo, Trung Minh (July 2024). "The influence of perceived risk on purchase intention in e-commerce—Systematic review and research agenda". International Journal of Consumer Studies. 48 (4) e13067. doi:10.1111/ijcs.13067. ISSN 1470-6423.
- ^ Chen, Tao; Samaranayake, Premaratne; Cen, XiongYing; Qi, Meng; Lan, Yi-Chen (2022-06-08). "The Impact of Online Reviews on Consumers' Purchasing Decisions: Evidence From an Eye-Tracking Study". Frontiers in Psychology. 13 865702. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865702. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 9216200. PMID 35756238.
- ^ Kannan, P. K; Alice Li, Hongshuang (2017). "Digital Marketing: A framework, review and research agenda". International Journal of Research in Marketing. 34 (1): 22–45. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006. S2CID 168288051.
- ^ Vafaei, Seyyed Amir; Fekete-Farkas, Mária (2017), Illés, Bálint Csaba; Nowicka-Skowron, Maria; Horská, Elena; Dunay, Anna (eds.), "Short communication: The effect of social media on customer behaviour and firms' activities", Management and Organization: Concepts, Tools and Applications, Pearson, pp. 221–228, doi:10.18515/dbem.m2017.n02.ch19, ISBN 978-1-78726-048-1, retrieved 2020-10-16
- ^ Pappas, N (March 2016). "Marketing Strategies perceived risks, and consumer trust in online behaviour" (PDF). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 29: 92–103. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.007.
- ^ Kawai, F; Tagg, S (July 2017). "The construction of online shopping experience: A repertory grid approach" (PDF). Computers in Human Behavior. 72: 222–232. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.055.
- ^ Stefko, Robert; Bacik, Radovan; Fedorko, Richard; Olearova, Maria (2022-03-30). "Gender-generation characteristic in relation to the customer behavior and purchasing process in terms of mobile marketing". Oeconomia Copernicana. 13 (1): 181–223. doi:10.24136/oc.2022.006. ISSN 2353-1827. S2CID 247944696. Archived from the original on 2023-10-01. Retrieved 2022-07-29.
- ^ Eggert, Andreas; Kleinaltenkamp, Michael; Kashyap, Vishal (2019-05-01). "Mapping value in business markets: An integrative framework". Industrial Marketing Management. 79: 13–20. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.004. ISSN 0019-8501. S2CID 169692893.
- ^ Maat, Kees; Konings, Rob (2018). "Accessibility or Innovation? Store Shopping Trips versus Online Shopping". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2672 (50): 1–10. doi:10.1177/0361198118794044. ISSN 0361-1981.
- ^ PCI Security Standards Council. "PCI Data Storage Do's and Don'ts" (PDF). Retrieved 24 March 2013.
- ^ Nielsen, "Online Shopping Trends", (USA: The Nielsen Company, 2010)
- ^ Chen, Tao; Samaranayake, Premaratne; Cen, XiongYing; Qi, Meng; Lan, Yi-Chen (2022-06-08). "The Impact of Online Reviews on Consumers' Purchasing Decisions: Evidence From an Eye-Tracking Study". Frontiers in Psychology. 13 865702. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865702. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 9216200. PMID 35756238.
- ^ Wang, Qiwei; Zhu, Xiaoya; Wang, Manman; Zhou, Fuli; Cheng, Shuang (2023-05-18). "A theoretical model of factors influencing online consumer purchasing behavior through electronic word of mouth data mining and analysis". PLOS ONE. 18 (5) e0286034. Bibcode:2023PLoSO..1886034W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286034. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 10194948. PMID 37200302.
- ^ "Word-of-Mouth Marketing: Meaning and Uses in Business". Investopedia. Retrieved 2023-02-15.
- ^ "Nielsen Global Online Shopping Report". nielsen.com. 2010-06-29. Retrieved 2012-01-19.
- ^ "Infographic: What We Do Online". Marketingland.com. 2012-07-09. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
- ^ Phamthi, Van Anh; Nagy, Ákos; Ngo, Trung Minh (2024). "The influence of perceived risk on purchase intention in e-commerce—Systematic review and research agenda". International Journal of Consumer Studies. 48 (4) e13067. doi:10.1111/ijcs.13067. ISSN 1470-6431.
- ^ Lopresti, Michael (September 1, 2007). "Bill-2-Phone Lets Customers Add Online Purchases to Their Phone Bill". Allbusiness.com. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
- ^ Geena Rao (July 19, 2010). "Mopay Now Allows You To Bill Mobile Payments To A Landline Account". TechCrunch.com. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
- ^ Walker, John (2007-11-22). "RPS Exclusive: Gabe Newell Interview". Rock, Paper, Shotgun. Retrieved 2013-06-28.
The worst days [for game development] were the cartridge days for the NES. It was a huge risk – you had all this money tied up in silicon in a warehouse somewhere, and so you'd be conservative in the decisions you felt you could make, very conservative in the IPs you signed, your art direction would not change, and so on. Now it's the opposite extreme: we can put something up on Steam, deliver it to people all around the world, make changes. We can take more interesting risks.[...] Retail doesn't know how to deal with those games. On Steam [a digital distributor] there's no shelf-space restriction. It's great because they're a bunch of old, orphaned games.
- ^ "How Does Shopping Cart Software Works – Product Databases". 15 Jan 2004. Retrieved 7 Feb 2017.
- ^ WooCommerce is open-source and completely customizable eCommerce eCommerce solutions
- ^ Jarvenpaa, S. L.; Todd, P. A. (1997). "Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web". International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 1 (2): 59–88. doi:10.1080/10864415.1996.11518283.
- ^ Peterson, R. A.; Balasubramanian, S.; Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997). "Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing". Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 25 (4): 329–346. doi:10.1177/0092070397254005. S2CID 167790427.
- ^ "Advantages of E-Commerce". The Balance. Retrieved 2023-02-15.
- ^ King, Stephen F.; Liou, Jung-Shiuan (2004-12-01). "A framework for internet channel evaluation". International Journal of Information Management. 24 (6): 473–488. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.08.006. ISSN 0268-4012.
- ^ Mehrabian, A., & Russel J.A. (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- ^ a b Huang, M (2000). "Information load: its relationship to online exploratory and shopping behavior" (PDF). International Journal of Information Management. 20 (5): 337–347. doi:10.1016/s0268-4012(00)00027-x.
- ^ Campbell, D.J. (1988) Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40–52.
- ^ Perea y Monsuwé, Toñita; Dellaert, Benedict G.C.; de Ruyter, Ko (2004-01-01). "What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review". International Journal of Service Industry Management. 15 (1): 102–121. doi:10.1108/09564230410523358. ISSN 0956-4233.
- ^ Falk, Louis K.; Sockel, Hy; Chen, Kuanchin (2005). "E-Commerce and Consumer's Expectations: What Makes a Website Work". Journal of Website Promotion. 1 (1): 65–75. doi:10.1300/j238v01n01_06.
- ^ Phamthi, Van Anh; Nagy, Ákos; Ngo, Trung Minh (2024). "The influence of perceived risk on purchase intention in e-commerce—Systematic review and research agenda". International Journal of Consumer Studies. 48 (4) e13067. doi:10.1111/ijcs.13067. ISSN 1470-6431.
- ^ Chen, Tao; Samaranayake, Premaratne; Cen, XiongYing; Qi, Meng; Lan, Yi-Chen (2022-06-08). "The Impact of Online Reviews on Consumers' Purchasing Decisions: Evidence From an Eye-Tracking Study". Frontiers in Psychology. 13 865702. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865702. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 9216200. PMID 35756238.
- ^ Parker, Christopher J.; Wang, Huchen (2016). "Examining hedonic and utilitarian motivations for m-commerce fashion retail app engagement". Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. 20 (4): 487–506. doi:10.1108/JFMM-02-2016-0015.
- ^ "Consumers and their online shopping expectations – Ecommerce News". 20 February 2015. Retrieved 29 August 2016.
- ^ a b Sherry Y. Chen en Robert D. Macredie, "The assessment of usability of electronic shopping: A heuristic evaluation", International Journal of Information Management 25 (2005), 516–532
- ^ "Best Buy looks to new products to push sales". Minneapolis News.Net. 26 August 2014. Archived from the original on 7 December 2024. Retrieved 28 August 2014.
- ^ Selyukh, Alina (6 June 2018). "What Americans Told Us About Online Shopping Says A Lot About Amazon". NPR. Archived from the original on 2023-06-03.
- ^ Shu, Catherine (2013-04-17). "China's E-Commerce Market Grew To $190B In 2012, Driven By Mobile Users and Social Media, Says CNNIC". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2023-02-15.
- ^ Fan, Xiaojun; Ning, Nanxi; Deng, Nianqi (2020-03-19). "The impact of the quality of intelligent experience on smart retail engagement". Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 38 (7): 877–891. doi:10.1108/MIP-09-2019-0439. ISSN 0263-4503. S2CID 216507124.
- ^ Hsiao, Ming-Hsiung (2009). "Shopping mode choice: Physical store shopping versus e-shopping". Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 45 (1): 86–95. Bibcode:2009TRPE...45...86H. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2008.06.002.
- ^ "A guide for businesses on distance selling" (PDF). Office of fair trading. 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 August 2013. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
- ^ Online Shoppers Say They Rarely Return Purchases. Why?
- ^ a b "Ordering from a local store can curb online shopping's CO₂ emissions". 26 February 2020. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
- ^ Sarokin, David; Schulkin, Jay (26 August 2016). Missed Information: Better Information for Building a Wealthier, More Sustainable Future. MIT Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-262-03492-0.
- ^ Wang, Qiwei; Zhu, Xiaoya; Wang, Manman; Zhou, Fuli; Cheng, Shuang (2023-05-18). "A theoretical model of factors influencing online consumer purchasing behavior through electronic word of mouth data mining and analysis". PLOS ONE. 18 (5) e0286034. Bibcode:2023PLoSO..1886034W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286034. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 10194948. PMID 37200302.
- ^ Song, Zhouying (2022). "The geography of online shopping in China and its key drivers". Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 49 (1): 259–274. Bibcode:2022EnPlB..49..259S. doi:10.1177/23998083211002189. ISSN 2399-8083. Retrieved July 28, 2025.
- ^ Bowler, Dane (28 August 2023). "Amazon has a fencing problem". Seeking Alpha.
- ^ Tarasov, Katie (17 June 2022). "How TECH Stolen goods sold on Amazon, eBay and Facebook are causing havoc for major retailers". CNBC.
- ^ "Retail Crime Data Center". US Chamber of Commerce. 15 March 2023.
- ^ Denise J., Deveau (14 January 2010). "Keeping It Real for Cross-Border Online Shoppers". ecommercetimes.com. ECT News Network. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Online shopping at Wikimedia Commons
Online shopping
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Terminology
Core Concepts and Distinctions
Online shopping constitutes the process by which consumers acquire goods or services via internet-connected devices, utilizing web browsers or dedicated applications to interact with seller platforms.[11] This form of transaction emphasizes digital interfaces over physical presence, enabling remote selection, payment, and fulfillment coordination.[12] Central to online shopping are distinct e-commerce models that delineate participant roles and transaction flows. The predominant business-to-consumer (B2C) model involves retailers or manufacturers selling directly to individual buyers, as exemplified by platforms like Amazon, where end-users access curated inventories without intermediaries.[13] In contrast, consumer-to-consumer (C2C) models facilitate peer-to-peer exchanges through third-party sites such as eBay, allowing individuals to list and purchase from one another, often with platform-mediated trust mechanisms like ratings.[14] Business-to-business (B2B) transactions, while part of broader e-commerce, differ by focusing on wholesale volumes and negotiated terms between enterprises, typically excluding the direct consumer engagement characteristic of online shopping.[15] Key operational concepts include the virtual storefront, a digital emulation of a physical retail space comprising searchable product catalogs with images, descriptions, and pricing; the shopping cart, a temporary repository for selected items permitting review, quantity adjustments, and abandonment prior to commitment; and the checkout sequence, which integrates payment gateways, address verification, and order confirmation to finalize sales.[16] These elements distinguish online shopping from traditional brick-and-mortar retail, where tactile product handling, immediate possession, and in-person negotiation prevail, versus the online paradigm's reliance on proxies like customer reviews and return policies to mitigate information asymmetries.[17] Empirical data underscores this shift: global online retail sales reached $5.8 trillion in 2023, reflecting the scalability of digital models unbound by geographic or temporal store constraints.[13]History
Early Innovations and Precursors
Mail-order catalogs served as foundational precursors to remote purchasing, enabling consumers to order goods without physical store visits. In 1872, Aaron Montgomery Ward launched the first general merchandise mail-order catalog from Chicago, initially a single-sheet price list of 163 items targeted at rural farmers. This evolved into comprehensive catalogs, with Ward's reaching over 3,000 items by the 1890s, leveraging railroads and rural free delivery to distribute products nationwide.[18] Richard W. Sears expanded the model in 1893 with Sears, Roebuck & Co., issuing catalogs that grew to more than 500 pages by 1897, offering diverse goods from clothing to tools and facilitating widespread adoption among isolated populations.[19] The shift toward electronic precursors began in the late 1970s with innovations bridging television and computing. In 1979, British entrepreneur Michael Aldrich developed the first online shopping system by modifying a domestic television set to connect via a standard telephone line to a real-time transaction-processing computer, enabling grocery orders and other purchases in a business-to-consumer format he termed "teleshopping."[3] This setup, demonstrated with retailers like grocery chains, represented an early form of electronic data interchange for retail transactions, though limited to proprietary networks and lacking broad public access.[4] By the early 1980s, dial-up services introduced structured online marketplaces. France's Minitel network, rolled out widely from 1982, provided millions of free terminals for videotex-based services, including catalog shopping through vendors like La Redoute, where users could browse and order clothing via dedicated servers.[20] In the United States, CompuServe launched the Electronic Mall in 1984, an online directory connecting subscribers to over 110 vendors for direct purchases of items ranging from software to apparel, processed via electronic funds transfer.[21] These systems relied on modem connections and predated the World Wide Web, highlighting early experiments in digital commerce constrained by slow speeds and narrow user bases.[22]Expansion in the 1990s and 2000s
The expansion of online shopping accelerated in the mid-1990s alongside the commercialization of the World Wide Web and increased personal computer adoption. Amazon.com, founded by Jeff Bezos in July 1994 as an online bookstore operating from a garage in Bellevue, Washington, launched its website in July 1995, initially selling books via a simple interface that emphasized customer reviews and vast selection.[23] [24] Concurrently, eBay emerged in September 1995 when Pierre Omidyar created AuctionWeb, a peer-to-peer auction platform that facilitated consumer-to-consumer sales of collectibles and used goods, rapidly scaling to millions of listings by enabling direct transactions without traditional intermediaries.[25] [26] These platforms capitalized on dial-up internet access, which by 1995 connected about 10% of U.S. households, though early adoption was hampered by slow speeds and limited broadband availability.[27] By the late 1990s, online retail benefited from innovations in secure transactions, including the widespread adoption of SSL encryption for payments and the launch of PayPal in 1998, which simplified electronic transfers and reduced fraud risks for buyers and sellers.[28] Amazon went public in May 1997, raising $54 million, and expanded beyond books to include music, videos, and electronics by 1998, while eBay rebranded from AuctionWeb in 1997 and reported over 2 million auctions monthly by 1999.[23] U.S. e-commerce sales, though starting from a low base, reached approximately $27.6 billion in 2000, representing about 0.8% of total retail sales, driven primarily by these early movers rather than brick-and-mortar retailers, which accounted for less than half of online volume at the time.[29] [30] Globally, adoption lagged, with Europe and Asia seeing nascent platforms like QXL in the UK (1997) and initial e-commerce experiments in Japan, but the U.S. dominated due to higher internet penetration and venture capital inflows exceeding $50 billion annually into dot-com ventures by 1999.[27] The dot-com bubble's burst in March 2000, triggered by overvaluation and unsustainable spending—such as unprofitable customer acquisition tactics—led to the failure of nearly 800 e-commerce firms, including high-profile cases like Pets.com, due to inadequate logistics, low consumer trust in online payments (with fraud concerns peaking), and insufficient revenue to cover operational costs.[31] Survivors like Amazon endured by prioritizing infrastructure investments, such as warehouses, over short-term profits; Bezos maintained focus on long-term customer value despite a 90% stock drop, allowing the company to weather the downturn while competitors collapsed from cash burn and hype-driven models lacking viable paths to profitability.[32] eBay, with its asset-light auction model generating fees from transactions, proved more resilient, sustaining growth through network effects where buyer-seller volume created self-reinforcing liquidity.[33] In the 2000s, recovery was fueled by broadband proliferation—U.S. household penetration rising from 5% in 2000 to over 50% by 2007—and enhanced trust via features like buyer protections and return policies, propelling e-commerce's share of U.S. retail sales to 3.4% by 2008.[30] Amazon diversified into apparel, toys, and third-party seller marketplaces by 2000, achieving its first annual profit of $75 million in 2003 through cost efficiencies and scale.[23] Traditional retailers followed suit, with Walmart launching robust online operations in 2000 and eBay acquiring PayPal in 2002 to integrate payments seamlessly.[34] Globally, platforms like Alibaba emerged in China (1999, with Taobao auctions in 2003), capturing rapid growth in emerging markets where mobile and PC access expanded, though Western dominance persisted in standardized categories like electronics.[28] This era solidified online shopping's viability, shifting from speculative auctions and niche sales to broader catalog retailing, albeit still constrained by shipping costs and the absence of tactile product inspection.Post-2010 Acceleration and Milestones
Following 2010, online shopping experienced rapid acceleration, propelled by smartphone proliferation and improved internet infrastructure, with global e-commerce sales rising from $572 billion in 2010 to $4.2 trillion in 2020.[35] In the United States, e-commerce's share of total retail sales increased from approximately 4.2% in 2010 to 15.9% by the first quarter of 2024.[36] This period marked a shift toward mobile commerce, as smartphone adoption enabled app-based shopping; by the mid-2010s, mobile devices accounted for over half of online sales in select markets, contributing to a near-800% global sales increase from 2010 levels.[37][38] A pivotal early milestone occurred on Cyber Monday 2010, when U.S. online sales surpassed $1 billion for the first time, signaling maturing consumer confidence in digital transactions.[27] Social media platforms further amplified discovery and sales in the early 2010s, integrating shoppable features that blurred lines between browsing and purchasing.[39] In 2015, Amazon introduced Prime Day on July 15 to commemorate its 20th anniversary, creating an annual event that generated billions in revenue and popularized time-limited online promotions worldwide.[40] Alibaba's Singles' Day, originating in 2009, scaled dramatically post-2010, evolving into the largest single-day shopping event globally, with sales exceeding tens of billions by the late 2010s through aggressive discounts and logistics enhancements.[41] The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 provided the most acute catalyst, as lockdowns drove a 44% year-over-year U.S. e-commerce surge, elevating its retail share from under 12% pre-pandemic to over 14% by 2021 and fostering innovations like curbside pickup.[37][42] By 2025, global retail e-commerce sales were projected to exceed $4.3 trillion, reflecting sustained momentum amid hybrid retail models.[43]Global Market Overview
Sales Volume and Growth Metrics
Global retail e-commerce sales, a primary measure of online shopping volume, are projected to reach $6.419 trillion in 2025, representing 20.5% of total worldwide retail sales. This figure reflects a year-over-year growth of 6.8% from 2024, indicating a deceleration from peak pandemic-era rates but sustained expansion amid broader digital adoption.[7] Narrower estimates focused on B2C transactions for physical goods (excluding digital services, media, B2B, and C2C) place 2025 e-commerce revenue at US$3.66 trillion, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.29% projected through 2030, culminating in US$4.96 trillion by that year.[44] Similar projections from Mordor Intelligence forecast the e-retail market at USD 3.84 trillion in 2025, expanding at a CAGR of 6.31% to USD 5.21 trillion by 2030.[45] Discrepancies in these metrics stem from definitional differences, with broader retail e-commerce scopes incorporating comprehensive categories like groceries and electronics yielding higher totals, while stricter B2C physical goods benchmarks produce conservative figures. User penetration for e-commerce is anticipated at 54.3% in 2025, supporting around 2.8 billion active shoppers globally.[44]Regional and Demographic Variations
Asia-Pacific dominates global online shopping volume, with China capturing about 50% of the market in 2025, driven by platforms like Alibaba and high mobile penetration exceeding 1 billion users.[46] The United States follows with 26.5% market share, supported by mature infrastructure and consumer trust in sites like Amazon.[46] In contrast, Europe exhibits high per capita adoption but lower overall volume; for instance, 79% of Germans shop online as of 2024, bolstered by strong data privacy regulations and cross-border platforms.[47] Emerging markets in Latin America and Africa show accelerating growth rates above 20% annually, though from lower bases due to infrastructure challenges like logistics and payment access.[48] Penetration as a share of retail sales varies regionally: in South Korea, online shopping constitutes around 30% of total retail by 2023 figures, reflecting advanced digital ecosystems, while in the US it hovers at 15-20%.[49] Western Europe averages 61% population participation in online shopping as of recent pre-2025 data, with Nordic countries leading due to high internet access over 95%.[50] Globally, e-commerce represents about 20% of retail sales in developed economies versus under 5% in many developing regions, highlighting disparities tied to urbanization and broadband availability.[51] Demographically, younger cohorts drive adoption: adults aged 25-34 account for nearly 28% of Amazon visitors and over 24% of eBay's, prioritizing convenience and variety.[52] Millennials exhibit heightened engagement, being 57% more likely than average to order groceries online weekly.[53] Gender gaps persist in some markets; in the US, 72% of women versus 68% of men report online purchases, though male participation rises with categories like electronics.[52] Higher-income and urban dwellers show greater uptake globally, with 44% of millennials citing fast shipping as a key motivator, while rural and lower-income groups lag due to delivery costs and digital literacy barriers.[54]| Region/Country | Key Metric | Value (2025 or latest) |
|---|---|---|
| China | Market share | 50% global[46] |
| United States | Market share | 26.5% global[46] |
| United States | Population penetration | 87% expected to purchase online[55] |
| United Kingdom | Population penetration | 84% expected to purchase online[55] |
| Germany | Population shopping online | 79%[47] |
Operational Mechanics
The operational mechanics of online shopping encompass a typical workflow that includes customer browsing and product discovery, cart management, checkout and payment processing, followed by merchant-side order processing, inventory updates, packaging, and shipping via third-party logistics providers for delivery, culminating in post-delivery support and returns handling. This sequence integrates front-end user interactions with back-end logistics to facilitate transactions efficiently.[56]Product Discovery and Selection Processes
Consumers primarily discover products online through search engines, with 66% of shoppers using platforms like Google or Bing to identify new brands and items before visiting retailer sites.[57] This channel dominates due to its ability to match user queries with product catalogs via algorithms prioritizing relevance, keywords, and paid placements. External search often funnels traffic to e-commerce marketplaces such as Amazon or eBay, where nearly one-third of online shoppers conduct initial product research.[58] On-site discovery relies on internal search bars, category browsing, and faceted filters allowing users to refine results by price, brand, or attributes like color and size. These tools process natural language queries and autocomplete suggestions to reduce friction, though accuracy varies; misspellings or ambiguous terms can yield suboptimal results, prompting iterative searches. Mobile optimization enhances this, as features like sticky filters and fast-loading previews cater to on-the-go users, aligning with projections of 2.54 billion global online shoppers by 2025, many accessing via smartphones.[59][60] Personalized recommendations, powered by collaborative filtering and machine learning, suggest products based on browsing history, past purchases, and similar user behaviors, appearing in sections like "Frequently Bought Together" or homepages. As of 2025, 71% of e-commerce sites employ AI-driven suggestions, which influence up to 35% of sales by surfacing relevant items and increasing session depth, though they risk creating filter bubbles that limit exposure to novel products.[61] Social media platforms contribute significantly, with 40% of consumers discovering products via feeds, stories, or influencer posts in 2024, often transitioning to direct purchases through shoppable links.[62] Younger demographics, such as Gen Z, favor visual search (e.g., image-based queries) and voice assistants for intuitive discovery, used by 45% in recent studies.[63] Selection processes follow discovery, emphasizing evaluation via user-generated content and comparative tools. Shoppers routinely consult reviews and ratings, with 50% verifying creator or influencer endorsements against peer feedback to assess quality and authenticity.[64] Comparison features, such as side-by-side specs or price trackers on aggregator sites, aid decision-making by highlighting differences in features, shipping costs, and seller reliability. Price sensitivity drives abandonment if alternatives offer better value, while scarcity cues (e.g., "low stock" alerts) accelerate choices, though empirical data shows these tactics boost conversions by 15-20% only when paired with transparent information.[65] Overall, selection balances rational comparison with heuristics like star ratings, which correlate with return rates; products below 4 stars see 30% higher returns due to mismatched expectations.[57]Payment Systems and Transaction Security
Credit and debit cards constitute core payment methods in online shopping, with global e-commerce projections indicating credit cards at 16% and debit cards at 10% of transactions by 2026.[66] These cards enable direct processing through gateways that interface with issuing banks and networks like Visa and Mastercard.[67] Digital wallets, encompassing services such as PayPal, Apple Pay, and Google Pay, have surged in adoption, accounting for an estimated 54% of global e-commerce payments by 2026 due to their convenience in storing credentials and facilitating one-click purchases without repeated data entry. For international transactions, PayPal's buyer protection covers eligible purchases on foreign websites, offering reimbursement for non-delivery or misrepresentation, while Visa and Mastercard enable chargeback disputes for resolution; direct bank transfers generally provide limited recourse due to their irreversible nature.[68][69][70][66][67] Alternative systems include buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) options like Affirm and Afterpay, which defer payments into installments, appealing to consumers avoiding immediate full charges, and account-to-account transfers via automated clearing house (ACH) networks for direct bank debits.[71] In regions like North America, digital wallets often overlay card functionality, while global variations favor local methods such as Alipay in Asia.[72] Payment processors aggregate these methods, handling authorization, capture, and settlement while ensuring compatibility across merchants.[73] Transaction security relies on foundational protocols like Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption, which protects data in transit via HTTPS, preventing interception during transmission from buyer to merchant servers.[74] The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), established to safeguard cardholder data, mandates requirements for networks, servers, and applications handling payments, including firewalls, access controls, and regular vulnerability scans; non-compliance exposes merchants to fines and liability for breaches.[75] Version 4.0, effective from March 2024, introduces enhanced scripting security and multi-factor authentication for sensitive operations.[76] Fraud mitigation employs 3D Secure protocols, adding issuer authentication layers like one-time passcodes to reduce unauthorized use, alongside tokenization that replaces sensitive card details with unique identifiers.[77] Machine learning-based detection systems analyze transaction patterns for anomalies, such as unusual IP locations or velocity checks on purchase frequency.[78] Despite these, e-commerce fraud inflicted $44 billion in losses worldwide in 2024, driven by account takeovers, phishing, and synthetic identities, with projections exceeding $100 billion by 2029.[79] U.S. online scam losses reached $16.6 billion in 2024, underscoring persistent vulnerabilities amid rising digital transaction volumes.[80] Merchants often outsource compliance to third-party gateways to minimize PCI scope, though ultimate responsibility for secure transactions remains with the platform.[81]Fulfillment, Delivery, and Returns
Fulfillment in online shopping encompasses the logistical workflow from inventory receipt to order dispatch, including storage in warehouses or fulfillment centers, order verification upon receipt, item picking via automated or manual systems, secure packing to prevent damage, and integration with shipping carriers.[56] Large-scale operators maintain distributed networks of facilities to reduce transit times, with processes optimized for high-volume throughput during peak periods like holiday seasons.[82] In-house fulfillment suits retailers with control needs, while third-party logistics (3PL) providers handle outsourcing for scalability, though the latter introduces dependency risks in coordination.[83] Delivery relies on partnerships with carriers such as UPS, FedEx, and national postal services, employing methods from economy ground shipping—typically 3-7 days domestically—to premium express options achieving overnight arrival. For international purchases, shipping options like Cainiao, 4PX, and AliExpress Standard Shipping provide tracking numbers to enable traceability.[84][85] Platforms such as AliExpress, Temu, and Amazon incorporate buyer protection features tied to tracked deliveries, supporting disputes and refunds in cases of delivery issues. Freight forwarding services for cross-border shipments often include insurance options for added protection.[86] Last-mile challenges, including urban congestion and precise routing, often account for 50% of total logistics costs, prompting innovations like micro-fulfillment centers in city outskirts for same-day capabilities in select markets.[87] Consumer demand for rapid delivery has intensified, with surveys showing over 80% of U.S. shoppers expecting two-day or faster fulfillment in 2024, fueling investments in drone and autonomous vehicle trials despite regulatory hurdles.[88] Returns, managed through reverse logistics, involve customer-initiated product returns for inspection, restocking if resalable, or disposal, with e-commerce rates averaging 16.9% to 30%—substantially higher than the 8.9% for brick-and-mortar due to factors like fit uncertainty without physical trial.[89][90] In the U.S., these returns generated $890 billion in costs in 2024, straining profitability as non-resalable items lead to liquidation losses estimated at 20-30% of return value.[91] Retailers commonly implement 30-day free-return policies to lower purchase barriers and capture impulse buys, yet such leniency exacerbates fraud risks like wardrobing and environmental burdens from excess packaging waste.[92] Effective mitigation includes AI-driven return predictions and prepaid labels, though systemic over-returning persists as a byproduct of low-friction online transactions.[93]User Interface Design and Experience
User interface design in online shopping platforms involves the arrangement of visual elements such as buttons, menus, and images to facilitate intuitive interaction, while user experience encompasses the holistic flow from browsing to purchase, emphasizing ease, speed, and satisfaction. Poor UI/UX contributes to high cart abandonment rates, often exceeding 70% globally, primarily due to complex navigation or slow loading. Optimized designs, however, correlate with conversion rate improvements of up to 200%, as intuitive interfaces align user expectations with seamless functionality.[94][95] Core elements include streamlined navigation with hierarchical menus and persistent search bars, enabling rapid product discovery amid vast inventories. Clear call-to-action buttons, such as prominent "Add to Cart" prompts, guide users through selection processes, while consistent visual styling—using familiar icons and color schemes—reduces cognitive load. Product pages typically feature high-resolution images with zoom capabilities, detailed descriptions, and variant selectors for size or color, minimizing decision hesitation. Checkout interfaces prioritize minimal fields and progress indicators to combat abandonment, with one-click options pioneered by Amazon in 1999 reducing steps from multiple to single actions.[96][97][98] Mobile responsiveness has become foundational since the 2010s, adapting layouts to vary screen sizes via fluid grids and touch-optimized elements, as mobile devices accounted for over 50% of e-commerce traffic by 2020. Non-responsive sites suffer from distorted visuals and usability issues, leading to 53% higher bounce rates on mobiles compared to desktops. Features like swipeable galleries and thumb-friendly buttons enhance tactile engagement, directly boosting sales in a market where mobile conversions lag desktop by 1.5-2x without adaptation.[99][100][101] Personalization integrates dynamically into UI/UX through algorithm-driven recommendations, search autocompletes, and customized homepages based on browsing history, increasing relevance and session time. Such tactics can elevate conversions by 20-30%, as users perceive tailored interfaces as more trustworthy and efficient. Early e-commerce sites in the 1990s relied on static catalogs with rudimentary lists, evolving to interactive, data-responsive designs by the 2000s via AJAX for real-time updates without page reloads. Accessibility standards, including alt text for images and keyboard navigation, further ensure inclusivity, with compliant sites experiencing 15-20% higher engagement from diverse users.[102][103][104]Consumer Behavior
Psychological Drivers and Decision-Making
Online shopping decisions are influenced by a combination of utilitarian motivations, such as time efficiency and price comparison, and hedonic factors, including enjoyment and excitement from browsing vast inventories. Empirical studies identify perceived benefits like convenience and variety as primary drivers, with utilitarian aspects often outweighing hedonic ones in routine purchases.[105] However, emotional states play a significant role; positive emotions enhance purchase intentions, while negative ones reduce impulsivity by depleting cognitive resources.[106] The consumer decision-making process in e-commerce mirrors traditional models but is accelerated by digital tools: it begins with problem recognition, followed by extensive information search via search engines and recommendations, evaluation of alternatives based on attributes like price and ratings, purchase execution, and post-purchase assessment through reviews or returns.[107] Online environments facilitate higher-quality decisions through accessible data, yet they amplify psychological biases; for instance, anchoring effects from initial price displays can skew perceived value, leading to suboptimal choices.[108] Trust and perceived risk critically mediate decisions, with low trust in platforms increasing abandonment rates due to fears of data breaches or product misrepresentation.[109] Electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM), such as user reviews, bolsters trust by providing social proof, influencing up to 80% of purchases in some categories, though susceptibility varies by individual traits like risk aversion.[110] Psychological distance—spatiotemporal separation between consumer and product—further shapes intent, as greater distance reduces immediate gratification but heightens rational deliberation.[111] Impulse buying, characterized by unplanned, rapid acquisitions, is exacerbated online by seamless interfaces and stimuli like limited-time deals, affecting 40-80% of purchases in platforms like TikTok Shop.[112] Behavioral economics attributes this to emotional dysregulation, where immediate rewards override long-term costs, compounded by fear of missing out (FOMO) in social commerce environments.[113] Trait impulsiveness interacts with state triggers, such as personalized notifications, to drive unplanned spending, particularly among younger demographics.[114] Choice overload, or the paradox of choice, undermines decision-making when excessive options—sometimes as few as three in categories like electronics—induce anxiety, regret, and paralysis, reducing purchase likelihood and satisfaction.[115] Meta-analyses confirm that abundant alternatives decrease motivation to choose and heighten post-decision dissonance, prompting retailers to employ filters and personalization to mitigate overload without sacrificing variety. In fashion e-commerce, this effect correlates with lower adoption rates, as consumers experience decision fatigue from hyper-personalized yet overwhelming assortments.[116]Role of Reviews, Ratings, and Social Influences
In online shopping, consumer decisions are profoundly shaped by user-generated reviews and ratings, which serve as proxies for product quality and seller reliability in the absence of physical inspection. Over 99% of American consumers consult online reviews prior to purchases, with 93% reporting that these reviews directly influence their buying choices.[117] Positive reviews elevate trust and perceived value, prompting consumers to spend up to 31% more on well-reviewed items, while 86% avoid purchases from platforms marred by negative feedback.[118] Empirical data from e-commerce experiments indicate that displaying five or more reviews can boost conversion rates by 270%, with the effect intensifying for higher-priced goods where detailed textual feedback mitigates uncertainty.[117][119] Star ratings aggregate these sentiments into quantifiable signals, correlating strongly with purchase intent; products averaging 4.25 to 4.99 stars achieve the highest conversion rates, often exceeding 4% uplift compared to lower-rated alternatives.[120] This reliance stems from social proof mechanisms, where consumers infer efficacy from collective validation rather than isolated claims, though negative outliers disproportionately deter sales due to loss aversion.[121] Reviews from ordinary users carry greater weight for 87% of shoppers than endorsements from experts or celebrities, underscoring a preference for relatable experiences over authority.[122] Beyond individual reviews, broader social influences amplify decision-making through networks and digital communities. Social media platforms drive 70% of consumer purchases via mechanisms like peer recommendations, influencer endorsements, and viral sharing, with 54% of users researching products directly on these sites.[123] Influencer marketing, a subset of social proof, leverages perceived authenticity to sway behavior, as studies show it enhances credibility and urgency in e-commerce contexts.[124] Word-of-mouth extensions, including shared reviews and social commerce features, further entrench these effects, with 63% of consumers more inclined to buy after observing positive social signals.[125] However, susceptibility varies demographically, as younger cohorts exhibit heightened responsiveness to influencer-driven trends, reflecting evolved heuristics favoring group consensus in uncertain online environments.[126]Technological Innovations
AI, Personalization, and Automation
Artificial intelligence has transformed online shopping through advanced recommendation systems that personalize user experiences by analyzing browsing history, purchase patterns, and preferences to suggest relevant products. Amazon pioneered item-to-item collaborative filtering in 2003, enabling scalable recommendations that drive a significant portion of sales without relying on user ratings alone.[127] These systems leverage machine learning algorithms to predict consumer interests, resulting in leading e-commerce firms generating 40% more revenue from personalization efforts compared to peers.[128] Personalization extends to dynamic content adaptation, where AI tailors website elements like search results and promotions in real-time, boosting engagement and conversion rates by 20-30% in implementations reported by retailers.[129] For instance, Alibaba's AliMe virtual assistant integrates natural language processing to handle customer queries and provide context-aware suggestions, processing millions of interactions daily to enhance decision-making.[130] The global market for AI in e-commerce reached $8.65 billion in 2025, reflecting widespread adoption for such features, with projections to double by 2030 due to proven efficiency gains.[131] Automation via AI streamlines backend operations, including inventory forecasting and pricing adjustments, while front-end applications like chatbots reduce cart abandonment by offering instant support and upselling opportunities. AI-powered chat interfaces have been shown to quadruple conversion rates in some deployments by guiding users through purchases with personalized nudges.[132] Amazon employs AI-driven robotics and predictive analytics in fulfillment to optimize stock levels, minimizing overstock and delays, which contributes to faster delivery and higher customer retention.[133] Overall, 92% of businesses utilize generative AI for deeper personalization, underscoring its causal role in elevating online shopping efficiency over traditional methods.[134]Emerging Technologies like AR, Voice, and Blockchain
Augmented reality (AR) technologies facilitate virtual try-ons and product visualizations in online shopping, allowing consumers to overlay digital representations of items onto their real-world environment via smartphones or apps. This reduces purchase uncertainty, with retailers reporting 20-30% fewer returns after implementing AR try-ons.[135] Adoption has accelerated, as 80% of retail brands plan to integrate AR for customer engagement by 2025, including 3D visualizations on websites.[136] In the U.S., the AR e-commerce market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 21% from 2025 to 2030, driven by innovations in mobile AR.[137] Consumer surveys indicate that 56% report increased confidence in product quality due to AR, with 61% more likely to purchase after experiencing it.[138] Voice commerce, enabled by assistants like Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant, supports hands-free ordering and payments, integrating with e-commerce platforms for seamless transactions. The global voice commerce market reached USD 42.75 billion in 2023 and is expected to expand to USD 186.28 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of 24%, reflecting rising smart speaker penetration.[139] In the U.S., 49% of consumers used voice search for shopping in 2025, with Amazon Alexa adopted by 71.6 million users for purchases.[140][141] Over 27% of U.S. consumers completed online payments via voice assistants by mid-2022, a trend boosted by devices handling 8.4 billion active units worldwide in 2024.[142][143] Blockchain technology addresses e-commerce challenges through decentralized ledgers that ensure supply chain transparency and immutable transaction records. It enables end-to-end traceability, allowing verification of product origins and reducing fraud in logistics.[144][145] Smart contracts, self-executing code on blockchain, automate payments upon delivery confirmation via sensors, as seen in trade finance where RFID data triggers supplier releases.[146] Retailers like Nike employ blockchain to authenticate products against counterfeits, enhancing consumer trust in online provenance.[147] By 2025, permissioned blockchains are projected to streamline U.S. e-commerce supply chains, cutting administrative costs and verifying compliance in real-time.[148]Economic Dynamics
Competitive Advantages and Efficiency Gains
Online retailers benefit from significantly lower operational costs compared to brick-and-mortar stores, as they eliminate expenses associated with physical locations, such as rent, utilities, and extensive in-store staffing.[149] [150] This cost structure enables competitive pricing, with online platforms often undercutting traditional retailers by avoiding the overhead that can account for up to 20-30% of brick-and-mortar expenses in prime locations.[151] [152] Scalability provides another key advantage, allowing e-commerce businesses to expand inventory and reach global markets without proportional increases in infrastructure.[153] Unlike physical stores limited by shelf space, online platforms can offer vast product assortments, drawing from centralized warehouses and third-party sellers, which enhances consumer choice and supplier competition.[154] Data analytics further amplify this by enabling real-time demand forecasting and personalized marketing, reducing waste and optimizing stock levels.[152] Efficiency gains manifest in streamlined supply chains and transaction processes, where digital interfaces facilitate instant purchases and automated fulfillment.[155] In the U.S., e-commerce sales grew 5.3% in Q2 2025, outpacing total retail growth of 3.9%, reflecting faster adaptation to consumer preferences through just-in-time inventory and reduced holding costs.[156] Globally, e-commerce revenue is projected to reach $6.42 trillion in 2025, a 6.86% year-over-year increase, driven by efficiencies in logistics and reduced intermediary layers.[157] These advantages contribute to market share expansion, with online retail capturing approximately 20.1% of total U.S. sales in 2024, expected to rise to 22.6% by 2027, as platforms leverage algorithms for lower search costs and higher conversion rates compared to in-store browsing.[158] However, such gains depend on effective execution, as inefficiencies like high return rates can erode margins if not managed through data-driven policies.[159]Impacts on Pricing, Inflation, and Consumer Welfare
Online shopping has exerted downward pressure on retail prices through intensified competition and reduced search costs for consumers. Empirical analysis of U.S. data from 2005 to 2015 indicates that e-commerce expansion led to faster convergence of price differentials across cities for physical store goods, as online alternatives disciplined offline pricing.[160] Studies comparing online and offline markets for books, CDs, and electronics further confirm that internet prices are systematically lower, with reduced price dispersion enhancing price transparency.[161] This effect stems from platforms enabling real-time price comparisons and automated repricing, which erode traditional markups associated with physical retail overheads like rent and inventory display.[162] The rise of e-commerce has contributed to deflationary dynamics by slowing price increases relative to traditional channels. Research using Japanese retail data shows that e-commerce adoption lowered relative inflation rates, as online sellers face lower marginal costs and face global competition that curbs pass-through of input cost hikes.[163] In the U.S., economists note that greater online penetration correlates with slower price growth in affected categories, potentially offsetting broader inflationary trends through efficiency gains in supply chains and reduced intermediary margins.[164] Digital marketplaces, by minimizing physical infrastructure needs, amplify this pressure; for instance, e-commerce's immunity to certain inflationary inputs like local real estate costs has kept online goods relatively stable amid economy-wide rises.[165] Consumer welfare has risen substantially from these mechanisms, with gains accruing via lower effective prices, expanded variety, and time savings. Quantitative estimates place the welfare boost from U.S. online shopping at approximately 1.1% of total consumption by 2017, translating to about $1,150 annually per household through access to broader assortments and competitive pricing.[166][153] These benefits disproportionately favor higher-income households with better internet access, though overall surplus increases from reduced search frictions and oligopolistic pricing discipline in retail markets. However, dynamic pricing practices online can introduce variability, potentially eroding some gains if not offset by transparency tools, underscoring the net positive but context-dependent welfare effects.Effects on Traditional Retail and Employment
The rise of online shopping has significantly eroded the market share of traditional brick-and-mortar retailers, with e-commerce accounting for 16.3% of total U.S. retail sales in the second quarter of 2025, up from 16.1% in the prior year.[167] This shift, accelerated by platforms like Amazon, has led to widespread store closures, with approximately 15,000 retail locations projected to shutter in 2025 alone, more than double the previous year's figure.[168] High-profile bankruptcies illustrate the causal link: Toys "R" Us filed for bankruptcy in 2017 and liquidated in 2018, citing competition from online giants; similarly, Sears Holdings closed its remaining stores after repeated bankruptcies by 2019, RadioShack ceased operations in 2017, and Bed Bath & Beyond liquidated in 2023, all attributing declines to e-commerce's lower prices and convenience over physical retail's overhead costs.[169][170] Empirical data confirms localized impacts from e-commerce infrastructure: the opening of an Amazon fulfillment center reduces sales at nearby brick-and-mortar stores by about 4% and slows retail employment growth by nearly 1,000 jobs per affected county.[171] Across broader aggregates, e-commerce expansion correlates with a net quarterly loss of 938 retail jobs per U.S. county, alongside a 2.1% drop in proximate store employment and higher exit rates for smaller, younger establishments unable to adapt.[162] The retail sector shed almost 800,000 jobs during 2020 amid pandemic-driven online surges, far exceeding pre-pandemic annual losses of around 200,000.[172] Recent trends show continued pressure, with U.S. retailers announcing over 45,000 job cuts in January and February 2025 alone, a 572% year-over-year increase tied to e-commerce competition and economic uncertainty.[173] While traditional retail employment contracts, e-commerce generates offsetting gains in logistics and warehousing; for instance, each county-quarter sees 256 new transportation-warehousing jobs and 143 in food services as supply chains adapt to online fulfillment.[162] This reflects creative destruction, where efficiency gains from digital channels displace low-margin store roles but expand opportunities in scalable operations, though the transition has unevenly burdened sales-floor workers in legacy retail without equivalent skills for tech-enabled jobs.[162] Overall, the net employment effect remains debated, with retail's structural decline persisting despite brick-and-mortar sales stabilizing post-2020.[174]Risks and Challenges
Fraud, Counterfeits, and Cybersecurity Threats
Online shopping is susceptible to various forms of fraud, including payment scams, account takeovers, and impersonation schemes, which exploit the digital transaction process. In 2024, global e-commerce fraud losses reached an estimated $44 billion, with projections indicating a rise to $107 billion by 2029 due to increasing sophistication in fraudulent techniques such as synthetic identities and remote access attacks. In the United States, consumers reported $12.5 billion in total fraud losses to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in 2024, marking a 25% increase from 2023, with online shopping and investment scams among the leading categories. Fraud pressure on merchants rose 13% in 2025, driven by tactics like address manipulation and abusive returns, where fraudsters ship low-value items to mask returns of high-value goods.[79][175][176][177] Counterfeit goods proliferate on e-commerce platforms, often through third-party sellers on marketplaces like Amazon and Alibaba, undermining product authenticity and consumer safety. Counterfeits accounted for 3.3% of global trade in recent assessments, with the illicit market projected to expand to $1.79 trillion by 2030, outpacing legitimate growth due to online distribution channels. In fiscal year 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) seized counterfeits primarily from China and Hong Kong, representing nearly 90% of intellectual property rights enforcements, including hazardous fakes like pharmaceuticals and electronics sold online. These products pose risks beyond financial loss, such as substandard materials leading to health dangers; for instance, counterfeit medicines seized exceeded 1.5 million units in 2023, many originating from e-commerce sites. European Union imports include 5.8% counterfeits valued at €119 billion annually, with online platforms facilitating evasion of traditional border controls.[178][179][180][181][182] Cybersecurity threats compound these vulnerabilities, targeting e-commerce infrastructure through data breaches, ransomware, and malware that compromise payment systems and customer data. The retail sector, encompassing online shopping, faced more cyber breaches than any other industry in recent years, with global cybercrime costs projected to exceed $10.5 trillion annually by 2025. Ransomware emerged as the predominant organizational cyber risk, affecting 45% of surveyed entities, often disrupting e-commerce operations and leading to data exfiltration in 40% of large claims exceeding €1 million during early 2025. E-commerce sites experience heightened attacks during peak periods, such as an 8% rise in remote access attempts during the 2024 Black Friday/Cyber Monday compared to 2023, enabling theft of credentials and facilitation of further fraud. These incidents erode trust, with 76% of consumers abandoning sites after personal fraud victimization, amplifying economic fallout from stolen data used in identity theft, which saw over 1.1 million U.S. reports in 2024.[183][184][185][186][187][188][189]Privacy, Data Handling, and Ethical Concerns
Online retailers collect extensive personal data from consumers, including browsing histories, purchase patterns, location information, and device identifiers, primarily to enable personalized recommendations, targeted advertising, and inventory management.[190] This data aggregation often occurs through cookies, tracking pixels, and mobile app permissions, with platforms like Amazon and Alibaba processing billions of data points daily to predict consumer behavior.[191] While such practices improve user experience by reducing search friction and offering relevant products, surveys indicate that 79% of Americans believe it is not possible to live without data collection but feel a lack of control over their information, viewing risks like data misuse as outweighing benefits.[190] Data breaches represent a primary privacy risk, with the retail sector experiencing more incidents than any other industry due to high volumes of sensitive payment and personal information stored.[183] In 2023, the average cost of a retail data breach reached $3.54 million, encompassing direct losses, remediation, and reputational damage.[192] Notable examples include the JD Sports hack in early 2023, which exposed data of 10 million customers including names, addresses, and partial payment details via a compromised third-party email platform, and the April 2024 Pandabuy breach affecting 1.3 million users' personal information on the Chinese e-commerce site.[193][194] These incidents underscore vulnerabilities in supply chain partners and legacy systems, often leading to identity theft, financial fraud, and phishing targeted at shopping histories.[195] Ethical concerns arise from the commodification of consumer data, termed "surveillance capitalism" by scholar Shoshana Zuboff, where behavioral data is extracted and monetized without equivalent user bargaining power, enabling predictive manipulation of purchases.[196] Critics argue that opaque algorithms facilitate price discrimination—charging higher prices to inferred high-value customers based on inferred willingness to pay—and perpetuate data broker markets that aggregate and resell profiles for secondary uses like marketing or risk assessment, often without explicit consent.[197][198] Proponents counter that informed consent via privacy policies balances this, as data-driven efficiencies lower overall prices and expand access, though empirical evidence shows many users skim policies without comprehension, leading to de facto non-consent.[199] Regulatory responses include the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective May 2018, which mandates explicit consent for data processing and imposes fines up to 4% of global revenue for violations, resulting in a measurable decline in third-party trackers on e-commerce sites.[200] In the U.S., California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), enforced from 2020, grants residents rights to opt out of data sales and access/delete information, influencing broader practices but lacking GDPR's extraterritorial reach.[201] These laws have prompted retailers to enhance transparency and security, such as anonymization techniques and breach notifications within 72 hours under GDPR, yet compliance costs burden smaller e-commerce operators disproportionately, potentially reducing market entry and innovation.[202][203] Despite progress, the absence of a comprehensive U.S. federal privacy law leaves gaps, with 53% of breaches involving personally identifiable information like tax IDs.[204][205]Societal and Environmental Impacts
Labor Conditions and Market Disruptions
Online shopping has intensified demands on warehouse labor, particularly in fulfillment centers operated by major e-commerce firms. Amazon warehouses reported serious injury rates of 6.8 per 100 workers in recent analyses, more than double the industry average of 3.3 per 100 for comparable facilities.[206] The U.S. Senate's HELP Committee investigation in December 2024 found Amazon's injury rates nearly double those of non-Amazon warehouses over seven years, attributing this to productivity quotas and ergonomic hazards like repetitive picking tasks.[207] OSHA data from 2023 documented 36,170 serious injuries across Amazon facilities, with musculoskeletal disorders comprising 57% of recordable incidents despite a 32% improvement in such rates over five years.[208][209] High turnover exacerbates these issues; in California counties with Amazon fulfillment centers, warehouse worker turnover averaged 100.9% in 2017, driven by injuries, low pay, and demanding quotas.[210] Industry-wide, warehouse turnover often exceeds 40% annually, far above the national average, due to physical strain and shift work.[211] Gig economy delivery roles, integral to last-mile online shopping logistics, feature precarious conditions with variable low earnings and minimal protections. In 2024, Uber Eats drivers averaged $14.96 per hour, down 5% from prior years, while DoorDash drivers earned $12.23 per hour, a 3% decline, amid increased working hours for many.[212] Food delivery drivers reported average hourly earnings of $15.62 in October 2024, often without benefits, overtime pay, or job security, as independent contractors bear vehicle costs and risks.[213] Overall gig wages hovered at $18.73 per hour mid-2025, varying by region and platform, but workers frequently logged more hours for stagnant or falling real earnings adjusted for inflation.[214] These conditions stem from algorithmic scheduling and competition among platforms like Instacart and Grubhub, which prioritize speed over worker welfare, leading to burnout and income instability.[215] The expansion of online shopping has disrupted traditional retail markets, accelerating store closures and shifting employment patterns. U.S. retailers announced over 7,300 store closures in 2024, a 57% increase from 2023, partly due to e-commerce competition eroding physical sales.[216] Major chains like Bed Bath & Beyond, JCPenney, and Neiman Marcus filed for bankruptcy amid the "retail apocalypse," with e-commerce capturing 15.3% of total retail sales in 2023, up from prior years.[217][218] Department stores shed approximately 80,000 jobs net since early 2013, while nonstore (e-commerce) retailers added about 100,000, reflecting a reallocation rather than net loss but with skills mismatches for displaced sales workers.[219] Seasonal retail hiring fell to 520,000 positions in 2024 from 564,000 the previous year, as e-commerce reduces demand for in-store holiday staffing.[220] E-commerce's rise from 0.63% of retail sales in 1999 to 13.3% by 2021 has unevenly impacted local retail, closing smaller outlets while consolidating jobs in logistics hubs.[171] This disruption favors efficiency in distribution over dispersed storefronts, though it has not yielded overall retail employment decline when including e-commerce gains.[221]Comparative Environmental Footprint
Online shopping's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are generally lower than those from traditional brick-and-mortar retail when consumers drive to stores, primarily due to the efficiency of consolidated delivery routes versus dispersed individual vehicle trips.[222] A 2023 systematic review of multiple studies found that online purchases produce a lower carbon footprint than in-store purchases made by car, attributing this to optimized logistics in e-commerce supply chains.[222] For instance, in the United States, e-commerce GHG emissions were estimated at 17% lower than bricks-and-mortar retail in base-case scenarios as of 2020, factoring in transportation, warehousing, and consumer behavior.[223] Transportation remains the dominant factor, with last-mile delivery often emitting less CO2 per item than equivalent consumer driving distances. A 2013 University of Washington analysis of grocery shopping showed delivery trucks producing 20-75% less CO2 than personal vehicles for the same loads, as trucks achieve higher utilization rates on fixed routes.[224] Conversely, short trips under 2 km to physical stores can make online shopping 29% more emissions-intensive due to inefficient last-mile vans, though emissions drop by 29-50% for longer distances.[225] In-store purchases generate approximately 2.3 times more CO2 than online equivalents when averaging typical driving patterns.[226] Packaging and returns, however, increase e-commerce's footprint relative to traditional retail. Online orders produce 4.8 times more packaging waste per item, exacerbating landfill contributions and requiring additional transport for disposal or recycling.[227] High return rates—often 20-30% for apparel—double shipping emissions for reversed logistics, with EU apparel returns alone contributing significant GHG from unclaimed reverse flows as of 2024.[228] These offsets can narrow or reverse net savings in categories with frequent returns, though overall GHG advantages persist in most aggregated models unless consumers walk or bike to stores.[229]| Factor | Online Shopping | Traditional Retail | Net Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportation GHG | Lower for consolidated delivery (e.g., 17-75% savings vs. car trips)[223][224] | Higher from individual consumer vehicles (e.g., 8.7 kg CO2e per trip)[230] | Online lower unless short walks/bikes |
| Packaging Waste | 4.8x higher per item[227] | Minimal, reusable bags common | Traditional lower |
| Returns Impact | Doubles emissions for 20-30% rates[228] | Negligible on-site | Online higher |