Hubbry Logo
ShoeShoeMain
Open search
Shoe
Community hub
Shoe
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Shoe
Shoe
from Wikipedia

Three blue shelves on a black background. The top shelf displays a pair of pink high heels, a wedge sandal and a dance heel shoe. The middle shelf displays a variety of low-heeled, slipper-type shoes. The bottom shelf displays two antique heeled shoes and a pair of kid's shoes.
A variety of shoes displayed at the Nordic Museum, including models from 1700 to the 1960s.

A shoe is an item of footwear intended to protect and comfort the human foot. Though the human foot can adapt to varied terrains and climate conditions, it is vulnerable, and shoes provide protection. Form was originally tied to function, but over time, shoes also became fashion items. Some shoes are worn as safety equipment, such as steel-toe boots, which are required footwear at industrial worksites.

Additionally, shoes have often evolved into many different designs; high heels, for instance, are most commonly worn by women during fancy occasions. Contemporary footwear varies vastly in style, complexity and cost. Basic sandals may consist of only a thin sole and simple strap and be sold for a low cost. High fashion shoes made by famous designers may be made of expensive materials, use complex construction and sell for large sums of money. Some shoes are designed for specific purposes, such as boots designed specifically for mountaineering or skiing, while others have more generalized usage such as sneakers which have transformed from a special purpose sport shoe into a general use shoe.

Traditionally, shoes have been made from leather, wood or canvas, but are increasingly being made from rubber, plastics, and other petrochemical-derived materials.[1] Globally, the shoe industry is a $200 billion a year industry.[1] 90% of shoes end up in landfills, because the materials are hard to separate, recycle or otherwise reuse.[1]

History

[edit]

Antiquity

[edit]
The oldest known leather shoe, about 5500 years old, found in Armenia
Esparto sandals from the 6th or 5th millennium BC found in Spain
Roman shoes: a man's,[2] a woman's[3] and a child's[4] shoe from Bar Hill Roman Fort, Scotland.

Earliest evidence

[edit]

The earliest known shoes are sagebrush bark sandals dating from approximately 7000 or 8000 BC, found in the Fort Rock Cave in the US state of Oregon in 1938.[5] The world's oldest leather shoe, made from a single piece of cowhide laced with a leather cord along seams at the front and back, was found in the Areni-1 cave complex in Armenia in 2008 and is believed to date to 3500 BC.[6][7] Ötzi the Iceman's shoes, dating to 3300 BC, featured brown bearskin bases, deerskin side panels, and a bark-string net, which pulled tight around the foot.[6] The Jotunheimen shoe was discovered in August 2006: archaeologists estimate that this leather shoe was made between 1800 and 1100 BC,[8][9] making it the oldest article of clothing discovered in Scandinavia. Sandals and other plant fiber based tools were found in Cueva de los Murciélagos in Albuñol in southern Spain in 2023, dating to approximately 7500 to 4200 BC, making them what are believed to be the oldest shoes found in Europe.[10]

It is thought that shoes may have been used long before this, but because the materials used were highly perishable, it is difficult to find evidence of the earliest footwear.[11]

Footprints suggestive of shoes or sandals due to having crisp edges, no signs of toes found and three small divots where leather tying laces/straps would have been attached have been at Garden Route National Park, Addo Elephant National Park and Goukamma Nature Reserve in South Africa.[12] These date back to between 73,000 and 136,000 BP. Consistent with the existence of such shoe is the finding of bone awls dating back to this period that could have made simple footwear.[12]

Another source of evidence is the study of the bones of the smaller toes (as opposed to the big toe); it was observed that their thickness decreased approximately 40,000 to 26,000 years ago. This led archaeologists to deduce the existence of common rather than an occasional wearing of shoes as this would lead to less bone growth, resulting in shorter, thinner toes.[13] These earliest designs were very simple, often mere "foot bags" of leather to protect the feet from rocks, debris, and cold.

Americas

[edit]

Many early natives in North America wore a similar type of footwear, known as the moccasin. These are tight-fitting, soft-soled shoes typically made out of leather or bison hides. Many moccasins were also decorated with various beads and other adornments. Moccasins were not designed to be waterproof, and in wet weather and warm summer months, most Native Americans went barefoot.[14] The leaves of the sisal plant were used to make twine for sandals in South America while the natives of Mexico used the Yucca plant.[15][16]

Africa and Middle East

[edit]

As civilizations began to develop, thong sandals (precursors to the modern flip-flop) were worn. This practice dates back to pictures of them in ancient Egyptian murals from 4000 BC. "Thebet" may have been the term used to describe these sandals in Egyptian times, possibly from the city Thebes. The Middle Kingdom is when the first of these thebets were found, but it is possible that it debuted in the Early Dynastic Period.[17] One pair found in Europe was made of papyrus leaves and dated to be approximately 1,500 years old. They were also worn in Jerusalem during the first century of the Christian era.[18] Thong sandals were worn by many civilizations and made from a vast variety of materials. Ancient Egyptian sandals were made from papyrus and palm leaves. The Masai of Africa made them out of rawhide. In India they were made from wood.

While thong sandals were commonly worn, many people in ancient times, such as the Egyptians, Hindus and Greeks, saw little need for footwear, and most of the time, preferred being barefoot.[19] The Egyptians and Hindus made some use of ornamental footwear, such as a soleless sandal known as a "Cleopatra",[citation needed] which did not provide any practical protection for the foot.

Asia and Europe

[edit]

The ancient Greeks largely viewed footwear as self-indulgent, unaesthetic and unnecessary. They typically preferred to go barefoot, with shoes primarily worn in the theater, as a means of increasing stature.[19] Athletes in the Ancient Olympic Games participated barefoot and naked.[20] The ancient Greek gods and heroes were primarily depicted barefoot, as well as the hoplite warriors. They fought battles in bare feet; Alexander the Great led barefoot armies in military campaigns. The runners of ancient Greece are also believed to have run barefoot.[21]

Footwear of Roman soldiers (reconstruction)

The Romans did not accept the Greek perception of footwear and clothing, despite having adopted much else of their culture. Clothing in ancient Rome signified power and footwear was seen as a civilizational necessity, although the slaves and paupers usually went barefoot.[19] Roman soldiers were issued with chiral (left and right shoe different) footwear.[22] Shoes for soldiers had riveted insoles to extend the life of the leather, increase comfort, and provide better traction. The design of these shoes also designated the rank of the officers. The more intricate the insignia and the higher up the boot went on the leg, the higher the rank of the soldier.[23] There are references to shoes being worn in the Bible.[24] In China and Japan, rice straws were used.[citation needed]

Starting around 4 BC, the Greeks began wearing symbolic footwear. These were heavily decorated to clearly indicate the status of the wearer. Courtesans wore leather shoes colored with white, green, lemon or yellow dyes, and young woman betrothed or newly married wore pure white shoes. Because of the cost to lighten leather, shoes of a paler shade were a symbol of wealth in the upper class. Often, the soles would be carved with a message so it would imprint on the ground. Cobblers became a notable profession around this time, with Greek shoemakers becoming famed in the Roman Empire.[25]

Middle Ages and early modern period

[edit]

Asia and Europe

[edit]

A common casual shoe in the Pyrenees during the Middle Ages was the espadrille. This is a sandal with braided jute soles and a fabric upper portion, and often includes fabric laces that tie around the ankle. The term is French and comes from the esparto grass. The shoe originated in the Catalonian region of Spain as early as the 13th century, and was commonly worn by peasants in the farming communities in the area.[16]

New styles began to develop during the Song dynasty in China, some of them resulting from the binding of women's feet, first used by the noble Han classes, but soon spreading throughout Chinese society. The practice allegedly started during the Shang dynasty, but it grew popular by c. AD 960.[26]

When the Mongols conquered China, they dissolved the practice in 1279, and the Manchus banned foot binding in 1644. The Han people, however, continued the practice without much government intervention.[26]

Dutch pattens, c. 1465. Excavated from the archeological site of Walraversijde, near Ostend, Belgium

In medieval times shoes could be up to 2 feet (61 cm) long, with their toes sometimes filled with hair, wool, moss, or grass.[27] Many medieval shoes were made using the turnshoe method of construction, in which the upper was turned flesh side out, and was lasted onto the sole and joined to the edge by a seam.[28] The shoe was then turned inside-out so that the grain was outside. Some shoes were developed with toggled flaps or drawstrings to tighten the leather around the foot for a better fit. Surviving medieval turnshoes often fit the foot closely, with the right and left shoe being mirror images.[29] Around 1500, the turnshoe method was largely replaced by the welted rand method (where the uppers are sewn to a much stiffer sole and the shoe cannot be turned inside-out).[30] The turn shoe method is still used for some dance and specialty shoes.

By the 15th century, pattens became popular by both men and women in Europe. These are commonly seen as the predecessor of the modern high-heeled shoe,[31] while the poor and lower classes in Europe, as well as slaves in the New World, were barefoot.[19] In the 15th century, the Crakow was fashionable in Europe. This style of shoe is named because it is thought to have originated in Kraków, the capital of Poland. The style is characterized by the point of the shoe, known as the "polaine", which often was supported by a whalebone tied to the knee to prevent the point getting in the way while walking.[32] Also during the 15th century, chopines were created in Spain, and were usually 7–8 in (180–200 mm) high.[33] These shoes became popular in Venice and throughout Europe, as a status symbol revealing wealth and social standing. During the 16th century, royalty, such as Catherine de Medici or Mary I of England, started wearing high-heeled shoes to make them look taller or larger than life. By 1580, even men wore them, and a person with authority or wealth was often referred to as, "well-heeled".[31] In 17th century France, heels were exclusively worn by aristocrats. King Louis XIV outlawed anybody from wearing red high heels except for himself and his royal court.[34]

Eventually the modern shoe, with a sewn-on sole, was devised. Since the 17th century, most leather shoes have used a sewn-on sole. This remains the standard for finer-quality dress shoes today. Until around 1800, welted rand shoes were commonly made without differentiation for the left or right foot. Such shoes are now referred to as "straights".[35] Only gradually did the modern foot-specific shoe become standard.

Industrial era

[edit]

Asia and Europe

[edit]
A shoemaker in the Georgian era, from The Book of English Trades, 1821.

Shoemaking became more commercialized in the mid-18th century, as it expanded as a cottage industry. Large warehouses began to stock footwear, made by many small manufacturers from the area.

Until the 19th century, shoemaking was a traditional handicraft, but by the century's end, the process had been almost completely mechanized, with production occurring in large factories. Despite the obvious economic gains of mass production, the factory system produced shoes without the individual differentiation that the traditional shoemaker was able to provide.

In the 19th century Chinese feminists called for an end to foot binding, and a ban in 1902 was implemented. The ban was soon repealed, but it was banned again in 1911 by the new Nationalist government. It was effective in coastal cities, but countryside cities continued without much regulation. Mao Zedong enforced the rule in 1949 and the practice is still forbidden. A number of women still have bound feet today.[26]

Woman's shoe, China, possibly Shanxi or Ningbo style, late 19th to early 20th century

The first steps towards mechanisation were taken during the Napoleonic Wars by the engineer, Marc Brunel. He developed machinery for the mass production of boots for the soldiers of the British Army. In 1812, he devised a scheme for making nailed-boot-making machinery that automatically fastened soles to uppers by means of metallic pins or nails.[36] With the support of the Duke of York, the shoes were manufactured, and, due to their strength, cheapness, and durability, were introduced for the use of the army. In the same year, the use of screws and staples was patented by Richard Woodman. Brunel's system was described by Sir Richard Phillips as a visitor to his factory in Battersea as follows:

By the late 19th century, the shoemaking industry had migrated to the factory and was increasingly mechanized. Pictured, the bottoming room of the B. F. Spinney & Co. factory in Lynn, Massachusetts, 1872.

In another building I was shown his manufactory of shoes, which, like the other, is full of ingenuity, and, in regard to subdivision of labour, brings this fabric on a level with the oft-admired manufactory of pins. Every step in it is affected by the most elegant and precise machinery; while, as each operation is performed by one hand, so each shoe passes through twenty-five hands, who complete from the hide, as supplied by the currier, a hundred pairs of strong and well-finished shoes per day. All the details are performed by the ingenious application of the mechanic powers; and all the parts are characterised by precision, uniformity, and accuracy. As each man performs but one step in the process, which implies no knowledge of what is done by those who go before or follow him, so the persons employed are not shoemakers, but wounded soldiers, who are able to learn their respective duties in a few hours. The contract at which these shoes are delivered to Government is 6s. 6d. per pair, being at least 2s. less than what was paid previously for an unequal and cobbled article.[37]

However, when the war ended in 1815, manual labour became much cheaper, and the demand for military equipment subsided. As a consequence, Brunel's system was no longer profitable and it soon ceased business.[36]

Americas

[edit]

Similar exigencies at the time of the Crimean War stimulated a renewed interest in methods of mechanization and mass-production, which proved longer lasting.[36] A shoemaker in Leicester, Tomas Crick, patented the design for a riveting machine in 1853. His machine used an iron plate to push iron rivets into the sole. The process greatly increased the speed and efficiency of production. He also introduced the use of steam-powered rolling-machines for hardening leather and cutting-machines, in the mid-1850s.[38]

Advertisement in an 1896 issue of McClure's for "The Regal".
Attila, a former shoe factory from the 1910s in Tampere, Finland

The sewing machine was introduced in 1846, and provided an alternative method for the mechanization of shoemaking. By the late 1850s, the industry was beginning to shift towards the modern factory, mainly in the US and areas of England. A shoe-stitching machine was invented by the American Lyman Blake in 1856 and perfected by 1864. Entering into a partnership with McKay, his device became known as the McKay stitching machine and was quickly adopted by manufacturers throughout New England.[39] As bottlenecks opened up in the production line due to these innovations, more and more of the manufacturing stages, such as pegging and finishing, became automated. By the 1890s, the process of mechanisation was largely complete.

On January 24, 1899, Humphrey O'Sullivan of Lowell, Massachusetts, was awarded a patent for a rubber heel for boots and shoes.[40]

By the 20th century, the United States had become the largest manufacturer of shoes worldwide.[41]

Globalization

[edit]

In 1910, the AGO system of stitchless, glued shoes was developed. Since the mid-20th century, advances in rubber, plastics, synthetic cloth, and industrial adhesives have allowed manufacturers to create shoes that stray considerably from traditional crafting techniques. Leather, which had been the primary material in earlier styles, has remained standard in expensive dress shoes, but athletic shoes often have little or no real leather. Soles, which were once laboriously hand-stitched on, are now more often machine stitched or simply glued on. Many of these newer materials, such as rubber and plastics, have made shoes less biodegradable. It is estimated that most mass-produced shoes require 1000 years to degrade in a landfill.[42] In the late 2000s, some shoemakers picked up on the issue and began to produce shoes made entirely from degradable materials, such as the Nike Considered.[43][44]

As a result of globalization, share of shoe imports in the United States rose from 4% in 1960 to 89% by 1995.[41] In the Philippines, the town of Marikina produced 70% of the shoes sold domestically in the 1970s and 1980s, but after the country joined the World Trade Organization in 1995 for the economy's liberalization, a large influx of cheaply-produced shoes from China, Taiwan and other Asian countries made a sizable negative effect on its shoe industry.[41][45]

In 2007, the global shoe industry had an overall market of $107.4 billion, in terms of revenue, and is expected to grow to $122.9 billion by the end of 2012.[needs update] Shoe manufacturers in the People's Republic of China account for 63% of production, 40.5% of global exports and 55% of industry revenue. However, many manufacturers in Europe dominate the higher-priced, higher value-added end of the market.[46]

Culture and folklore

[edit]
Haines Shoe House in Hallam, Pennsylvania
Sports shoes in Hong Kong
Children's shoes at school in Ladakh

As an integral part of human culture and civilization, shoes have found their way into culture, folklore, and art. A popular 18th-century nursery rhyme is There was an Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe. In 1948, Mahlon Haines, a shoe salesman in Hallam, Pennsylvania, built an actual house shaped like a work boot as a form of advertisement; the Haines Shoe House still stands today and is a popular roadside attraction.[47]

Shoes also play an important role in the fairy tales Cinderella and The Red Shoes. In the movie adaption of the children's book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, a pair of red ruby slippers play a key role in the plot. The 1985 comedy The Man with One Red Shoe features an eccentric man wearing one normal business shoe and one red shoe that becomes central to the plot.

Athletic sneaker collection has also existed as a part of urban subculture in the United States for several decades.[48] Recent decades have seen this trend spread to European nations such as the Czech Republic.[49] A Sneakerhead is a person who owns multiple pairs of shoes as a form of collection and fashion.

In the Bible's Old Testament, the shoe is used to symbolize something that is worthless or of little value. In the New Testament, the act of removing one's shoes symbolizes servitude. Ancient Semitic-speaking peoples regarded the act of removing their shoes as a mark of reverence when approaching a sacred person or place.[50] The removal of the shoe also symbolizes the act of giving up a legal right. In Hebrew custom, if a man chose not to marry his childless brother's widow, the widow removed her brother-in-law's shoe to symbolize that he had abandoned his duty. In Arab custom, the removal of one's shoe also symbolized the dissolution of marriage.[50]

In Arab culture, showing the sole of one's shoe is considered an insult, and to throw a shoe and hit someone with it is considered an even greater insult. Shoes are considered to be dirty as they frequently touch the ground, and are associated with the lowest part of the body—the foot. As such, shoes are forbidden in mosques, and it is also considered unmannerly to cross the legs and display the soles of one's shoes during conversation. This insult was demonstrated in Iraq, first when Saddam Hussein's statue was toppled in 2003, Iraqis gathered around it and struck the statue with their shoes.[51] In 2008, United States President George W. Bush had a shoe thrown at him by a journalist as a statement against the war in Iraq.[52] More generally, shoe-throwing or shoeing, showing the sole of one's shoe or using shoes to insult are forms of protest in many parts of the world.[53][54]

Empty shoes may also symbolize death. In Greek culture, empty shoes are the equivalent of the American funeral wreath. For example, empty shoes placed outside of a Greek home would tell others that the family's son has died in battle.[55] The Shoes on the Danube Bank is a memorial in Budapest, Hungary, to honor the Jews who were killed by fascist Arrow Cross militiamen in Budapest during World War II.

Construction

[edit]

The basic anatomy of a shoe is recognizable, regardless of the specific style of footwear.

Sole

[edit]

All shoes have a sole, which is the bottom of a shoe, in contact with the ground. Soles can be made from a variety of materials, although most modern shoes have soles made from natural rubber, polyurethane, or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) compounds.[56] Soles can be simple—a single material in a single layer—or they can be complex, with multiple structures or layers and materials. When various layers are used, soles may consist of an insole, midsole, and an outsole.[57]

Insole

[edit]

The insole is the interior bottom of a shoe, which sits directly beneath the foot under the footbed (also known as sock liner). The purpose of the insole is to attach to the lasting margin of the upper, which is wrapped around the last during the closing of the shoe during the lasting operation. Insoles are usually made of cellulosic paper board or synthetic non woven insole board. Many shoes have removable and replaceable footbeds. Extra cushioning is often added for comfort (to control the shape, moisture, or smell of the shoe) or health reasons (to help deal with differences in the natural shape of the foot or positioning of the foot during standing or walking).[57]

Outsole

[edit]

The outsole is the layer in direct contact with the ground. Dress shoes often have leather or resin rubber outsoles; casual or work-oriented shoes have outsoles made of natural rubber or a synthetic material like polyurethane. The outsole may comprise a single piece or may be an assembly of separate pieces, often of different materials. On some shoes, the heel of the sole has a rubber plate for durability and traction, while the front is leather for style. Specialized shoes will often have modifications on this design: athletic or so-called cleated shoes like soccer, rugby, baseball and golf shoes have spikes embedded in the outsole to improve traction.[57]

Midsole

[edit]

The midsole is the layer in between the outsole and the insole, typically there for shock absorption. Some types of shoes, like running shoes, have additional material for shock absorption, usually beneath the heel of the foot, where one puts the most pressure down. Some shoes may not have a midsole at all.[57]

The heel is the bottom rear part of a shoe. Its function is to support the heel of the foot. They are often made of the same material as the sole of the shoe. This part can be high for fashion or to make the person look taller, or flat for more practical and comfortable use.[57] On some shoes the inner forward point of the heel is chiselled off, a feature known as a "gentleman's corner". This piece of design is intended to alleviate the problem of the points catching the bottom of trousers and was first observed in the 1930s.[58] A heel is the projection at the back of a shoe which rests below the heel bone. The shoe heel is used to improve the balance of the shoe, increase the height of the wearer, alter posture or other decorative purposes. Sometimes raised, the high heel is common to a form of shoe often worn by women, but sometimes by men too. See also stiletto heel.

Upper

[edit]

The upper helps hold the shoe onto the foot. In the simplest cases, such as sandals or flip-flops, this may be nothing more than a few straps for holding the sole in place. Closed footwear, such as boots, trainers and most men's shoes, will have a more complex upper. This part is often decorated or is made in a certain style to look attractive. The upper is connected to the sole by a strip of leather, rubber, or plastic that is stitched between it and the sole, known as a welt.[57]

Most uppers have a mechanism, such as laces, straps with buckles, zippers, elastic, velcro straps, buttons, or snaps, for tightening the upper on the foot. Uppers with laces usually have a tongue that helps seal the laced opening and protect the foot from abrasion by the laces. Uppers with laces also have eyelets or hooks to make it easier to tighten and loosen the laces and to prevent the lace from tearing through the upper material. An aglet is the protective wrapping on the end of the lace.

Vamp

[edit]

The vamp is the front part of the shoe, starting behind the toe, extending around the eyelets and tongue and towards back part of the shoe.

Medial

[edit]

The medial is the part of the shoe closest to a person's center of symmetry, and the lateral is on the opposite side, away from their center of symmetry. This can be in reference to either the outsole or the vamp. Most shoes have shoelaces on the upper, connecting the medial and lateral parts after one puts their shoes on and aiding in keeping their shoes on their feet. In 1968, Puma SE introduced the first pair of sneakers with Velcro straps in lieu of shoelaces, and these became popular by the 1980s, especially among children and the elderly.[59][60]

The toe box is the part that covers and protects the toes. People with toe deformities, or individuals who experience toe swelling (such as long-distance runners) usually require a larger toe box.[61]

Types

[edit]

Most types of shoes are designed for specific activities. For example, boots are typically designed for work or heavy outdoor use. Athletic shoes are designed for particular sports such as running, walking, or other sports. Some shoes are designed to be worn at more formal occasions, and others are designed for casual wear. There are also a vast variety of shoes designed for different types of dancing. Orthopedic shoes are special types of footwear designed for individuals with particular foot problems or special needs. Clinicians evaluate patient's footwear as a part of their clinical examination. However, it is often based on each individual's needs, with attention to the choice of footwear worn and if the shoe is adequate for the purpose of completing their activities of daily living.[62] Other animals, such as dogs and horses, may also wear special shoes to protect their feet as well.

Depending on the activity for which they are designed, some types of footwear may fit into multiple categories. For example, Cowboy boots are considered boots, but may also be worn in more formal occasions and used as dress shoes. Hiking boots incorporate many of the protective features of boots, but also provide the extra flexibility and comfort of many athletic shoes. Flip-flops are considered casual footwear, but have also been worn in formal occasions, such as visits to the White House.[63][64]

Athletic

[edit]
A pair of athletic running shoes
Bowling centers maintain bowling shoes for rental to patrons, to prevent damage to lane approaches.

Athletic shoes are designed for various sports activities, focusing on maximizing friction between the foot and the ground. These shoes often utilize materials like rubber to achieve this purpose.[65] The earliest athletic shoes, dating to the mid-19th century, were track spikes with metal cleats for increased traction. Over time, athletic shoe design evolved, with companies like Reebok and Adidas contributing to the development of modern athletic shoes. Notable innovations include rubber-soled athletic shoes and the introduction of specialized shoes for different sports, such as basketball and golf. More recently, minimalist shoes have gained popularity as barefoot running became popular by the late 20th and early 21st century, maintaining optimum flexibility and natural walking while also providing some degree of protection. Their purpose is to allow one's feet and legs to feel more subtly the impacts and forces involved in running, allowing finer adjustments in running style.[66][16][67]

The earliest rubber-soled athletic shoes date back to 1876 in the United Kingdom, when the New Liverpool Rubber Company made plimsolls, or sandshoes, designed for the sport of croquet. Similar rubber-soled shoes were made in 1892 in the United States by Humphrey O'Sullivan, based on Charles Goodyear's technology. The United States Rubber Company was founded the same year and produced rubber-soled and heeled shoes under a variety of brand names, which were later consolidated in 1916 under the name, Keds. These shoes became known as, "sneakers", because the rubber sole allowed the wearer to sneak up on another person. In 1964, the founding of Nike by Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman of the University of Oregon introduced many new improvements common in modern running shoes, such as rubber waffle soles, breathable nylon uppers, and cushioning in the mid-sole and heel. During the 1970s, the expertise of podiatrists also became important in athletic shoe design, to implement new design features based on how feet reacted to specific actions, such as running, jumping, or side-to-side movement for men and women.[16]

A pair of Converse All-Stars

Shoes specific to the sport of basketball were developed by Chuck Taylor, and are popularly known as Chuck Taylor All-Stars. In 1969, Taylor was inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame in recognition of this development, and in the 1970s, other shoe manufacturers, such as Nike, Adidas, Reebok, and others began imitating this style of athletic shoe.[68] In April 1985, Nike introduced its own brand of basketball shoe which would become popular in its own right, the Air Jordan, named after the then-rookie Chicago Bulls basketball player, Michael Jordan. The Air Jordan line of shoes sold $100 million in their first year.[69]

As barefoot running became popular by the late 20th and early 21st century, many modern shoe manufacturers have recently designed footwear that mimic this experience, maintaining optimum flexibility and natural walking while also providing some degree of protection. Some of these shoes include the Vibram FiveFingers,[70] Nike Free,[71] and Saucony's Kinvara and Hattori.[72][73] Mexican huaraches are also very simple running shoes, similar to the shoes worn by the Tarahumara people of northern Mexico, who are known for their distance running abilities.[74] Wrestling shoes are also very light and flexible shoes that are designed to mimic bare feet while providing additional traction and protection.

Many athletic shoes are designed with specific features for specific activities. One of these includes roller skates, which have metal or plastic wheels on the bottom specific for the sport of roller skating. Similarly, ice skates have a metal blade attached to the bottom for locomotion across ice. Skate shoes have also been designed to provide a comfortable, flexible and durable shoe for the sport of skateboarding.[75] Climbing shoes are rubber-soled, tight-fitting shoes designed to fit in the small cracks and crevices for rock climbing. Cycling shoes are similarly designed with rubber soles and a tight fit, but also are equipped with a metal or plastic cleat to interface with clipless pedals, as well as a stiff sole to maximize power transfer and support the foot.[76] Some shoes are made specifically to improve a person's ability to weight train.[77] Sneakers that are a mix between an activity-centered and a more standard design have also been produced: examples include roller shoes, which feature wheels that can be used to roll on hard ground, and Soap shoes, which feature a hard plastic sole that can be used for grinding.

Boot

[edit]
A pair of steel-toed safety boots

Boots are a specialized type of footwear that covers the foot and extends up the leg. They serve both functional and fashion purposes, offering protection from elements like water, snow, and mud while also being a fashion statement.

Cowboy boots, for instance, are known for their distinctive style and are popular among cowboys in the western United States. Hiking boots, on the other hand, are designed for comfort and support during long walks in rough terrains. Snow boots are ideal for wet or snowy weather, providing warmth and protection against the elements. Additionally, boots are used in specialized activities like skiing, ice skating, and climbing due to their unique features tailored to these activities.[78][79][80][81]

Boots may also be attached to snowshoes to increase the distribution of weight over a larger surface area for walking in snow. Ski boots are a specialized snow boot which are used in alpine or cross-country skiing and designed to provide a way to attach the skier to his/her skis using ski bindings. The ski/boot/binding combination is used to effectively transmit control inputs from the skier's legs to the snow. Ice skates are another specialized boot with a metal blade attached to the bottom which is used to propel the wearer across a sheet of ice.[82] Inline skates are similar to ice skates but with a set of three to four wheels in lieu of the blade, which are designed to mimic ice skating on solid surfaces such as wood or concrete.[83]

Boots are designed to withstand heavy wear to protect the wearer and provide good traction. They are generally made from sturdy leather uppers and non-leather outsoles. They may be used for uniforms of the police or military, as well as for protection in industrial settings such as mining and construction. Protective features may include steel-tipped toes and soles or ankle guards.[84]

Dress and casual

[edit]

Dress shoes are characterized by their smooth leather uppers, leather soles, and sleek design, suitable for formal occasions. In contrast, casual shoes have sturdier leather uppers, non-leather outsoles, and a wider profile for everyday wear. Some dress shoe designs are unisex, while others are specific to men or women.

Men's

[edit]

This male dress shoe, known as a derby shoe, is distinguished by its open lacing.

Men's dress shoes include styles like Oxfords, Derbies, Monk-straps, and Slip-ons, each with its unique characteristics in terms of lacing, decoration, and formality.

Women's

[edit]
High heel sandals

Women's shoes cover a wide range of styles, including high heels, mules, slingbacks, ballet flats, and court shoes, with high-heeled footwear being a popular choice for formal occasions.

Unisex

[edit]
  • Clog
  • Platform shoe: shoe with very thick soles and heels
  • Sandals: open shoes consisting of a sole and various straps, leaving much of the foot exposed to air. They are thus popular for warm-weather wear, because they let the foot be cooler than a closed-toed shoe would.
  • Saddle shoe: leather shoe with a contrasting saddle-shaped band over the instep, typically white uppers with black "saddle".
  • Slip-on shoe: a dress or casual shoe without shoelaces or fasteners; often with tassels, buckles, or coin-holders (penny loafers).
  • Boat shoes, also known as "deck shoes": similar to a loafer, but more casual. Laces are usually simple leather with no frills. Typically made of leather and featuring a soft white sole to avoid marring or scratching a boat deck. The first boat shoe was invented in 1935 by Paul A. Sperry.
  • Slippers: For indoor use, commonly worn with pajamas.

Dance

[edit]

Dancers use a variety of footwear depending on the style of dance and the surface they will be dancing on. Pointe shoes, for instance, are designed for ballet dancing, featuring a stiffened toe box and hardened sole to allow dancers to stand on the tips of their toes. Ballet shoes, on the other hand, are soft, pliable shoes made of canvas or leather, providing flexibility and comfort for ballet dancing. Other dance shoe types include jazz shoes, tango, and flamenco shoes, ballroom shoes, tap shoes, character shoes, and foot thongs, each designed to meet the specific needs of different dance styles.

Orthopedic

[edit]
Orthopedic heavy duty black leather school uniform shoes

Orthopedic shoes are specially designed to alleviate discomfort associated with various foot and ankle disorders, such as blisters, bunions, calluses, and plantar fasciitis. They are also used by individuals with diabetes, unequal leg length, or children with mobility issues.[85][86][87] These shoes typically feature a low heel, wide toe box, and firm heel for added support. Some orthopedic shoes come with removable insoles or orthotics to provide extra arch support.[16]

Measures and sizes

[edit]
World's largest pair of shoes, Riverbank Center, Philippines—5.29 metres (17.4 ft) long and 2.37 metres (7 ft 9 in) wide, equivalent to a French shoe size of 75.

Shoe sizes are indicated by a numerical value representing the length of the shoe, with different systems used globally. European sizes are measured in Paris Points, while the UK and American units are based on whole-number sizes spaced at one barleycorn (1/3 inch) with UK adult sizes starting at size 1 = 8+23 in (22.0 cm). In the US, this is size 2. Men's and women's shoe sizes often use different scales,[citation needed] and some systems are measured using a Brannock Device which considers the width and length size values of the feet. The Mondopoint system, introduced in the 1970s by International Standard ISO 2816:1973 "Fundamental characteristics of a system of shoe sizing to be known as Mondopoint" and ISO 3355:1975 "Shoe sizes – System of length grading (for use in the Mondopoint system)" includes measurements of both length and width of the foot.[88][89]

Toddler-sized shoe.

Accessories

[edit]

Various accessories are used to enhance the functionality and comfort of shoes. Crampons provide traction on icy terrain, foam taps adjust shoe fit, heel grips prevent slipping, and ice cleats enhance stability on slippery surfaces. Overshoes protect shoes from rain and snow, while shoe bags are used for storage. Shoe brushes and polishing cloths maintain shoe appearance, while shoe inserts offer additional comfort.

Removal of shoes

[edit]
"Plzz REMOVE YOUR SHOES" sign at entrance to stupa. Nubra, India

In many places in the world, shoes are removed when moving from exteriors to interiors, particularly in homes[90][91] and religious buildings.[92] In many Asian countries, outdoor shoes are exchanged for indoor shoes or slippers.[93] Fitness center etiquette encourages the exchange of outdoor shoes for indoor shoes, both to prevent dirt and grime from being transferred to the equipment and to ensure that participants are wearing the right shoes for their activities.[94]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A shoe is an outer covering for the foot typically having a thick or stiff sole with an upper part that encloses the top and sides of the foot.
Shoes primarily protect the foot from mechanical , temperature extremes, and pathogens encountered during locomotion on varied terrains. Archaeological evidence indicates that has been used by for at least 10,000 years, with the oldest preserved examples being bark from Fort Rock Cave in , dated to around 10,400 years ago. One of the earliest known shoes, a one-piece construction from , was discovered in Armenia's and dates to approximately 5,500 years ago.
Contemporary shoes are manufactured using materials including , rubber, , synthetic polymers, and textiles such as or , selected for properties like durability, flexibility, and water resistance. Construction methods vary, encompassing cemented attachments for lightweight athletic , stitched welts for resoleable dress shoes, and molded soles for mass-produced , enabling specialization for activities from running to industrial labor. Beyond protection, shoes influence , with designs affecting , posture, and risk, and they hold cultural significance as markers of status, , and identity across societies.

History

Prehistoric and Ancient Footwear

The earliest known footwear artifacts are bark discovered in Fort Rock , , radiocarbon-dated to between 9,000 and 13,000 years old, with some samples exceeding 10,500 years. These twined , constructed from shredded and twisted fibers, represent early adaptations to arid environments, providing protection against rough terrain and insulation. Similar plant-fiber from Northern caves indicate widespread use of local vegetal materials in prehistoric North American footwear construction. In , the in yielded a 5,500-year-old one-piece shoe made from , preserved by arid conditions and sheep dung, dating to approximately 3500 BCE. This artifact, sized for an adult male and featuring a simple stitched design, demonstrates advanced tanning and techniques using bone awls. Around the same period, the Iceman's footwear, recovered from the and dated to 3300 BCE, consisted of layered construction: a bearskin sole for durability, deerskin uppers attached via straps, and inner netting of lime tree bast stuffed with grass for warmth and cushioning. These examples highlight prehistoric reliance on animal hides for waterproofing and traction, combined with vegetal elements for flexibility and insulation, reflecting environmental necessities over aesthetic concerns. Ancient Egyptian footwear, emerging from the Predynastic period around 4000 BCE, primarily comprised woven from reeds, palm fibers, or vegetable matter, secured by or thongs. Elite examples, such as those from Tutankhamun's tomb (circa 1323 BCE), incorporated , wood, , and even gold overlays, symbolizing status while maintaining open designs suited to the Nile's climate. In and , predominated; Greek variants were often minimal straps for ventilation, while Roman caligae—hobnailed military —offered grip on varied terrains from the era onward (509 BCE). Simpler carbatinae, turnshoes of untanned , served rural populations into the CE, underscoring footwear's evolution from basic protection to specialized forms driven by societal roles and materials availability.

Medieval and Early Modern Developments

In medieval , footwear was predominantly crafted from using the turnshoe method, where the upper and sole were stitched together inside out and then inverted for wear, providing a supple fit suitable for the era's unpaved streets and varied terrains. Materials included vegetable-tanned hides, with sheep and skins common in the early period transitioning to cattle hides by the later for durability. Shoemakers organized into guilds, such as the Cordwainers established in by 1131, which regulated quality, apprenticeships, and trade practices to maintain standards amid urban growth. To address muddy conditions, pattens—elevated wooden oversoles strapped over leather shoes—emerged by the late , featuring raised heels and toes for protection and height; these were fastened with straps and shaped to match contemporary shoe fashions. Fashion trends included the , a pointed-toe style popularized from the late among the elite, with extremes reaching up to 24 inches in length before sumptuary laws curtailed excesses by the . Boots like the 9th-century Huese, made from supple , introduced higher footwear for practical use across . During the (c. 1500–1800), saw refinements in design and status symbolism, with the adoption of low heels originating from equestrian needs and spreading via Persian influences to European courts by the ; men initially wore these elevated styles to signify masculinity and wealth. In , chopines—platform overshoes up to 20 inches high—were worn by Venetian noblewomen for elevation and modesty, regulated by law to prevent excess. By the , buckled latchet shoes and coordinated left-right pairs became standard among the upper classes, reflecting increased specialization and access to finer leathers from colonial . oversight persisted, ensuring craftsmanship amid rising demand, though archaeological finds from sites like shipwrecks reveal multi-ethnic influences in production centers such as the region.

Industrialization and Mass Production

Prior to the mid-19th century, shoe production relied on manual labor in small workshops, where skilled artisans hand-stitched uppers and soles, limiting output to dozens of pairs per day per worker. The advent of specialized machinery transformed this process into a factory-based industry, enabling , higher volumes, and reduced costs. Key innovations included improvements to the shoe by in the 1860s, which automated stitching the upper to the insole and outsole, significantly accelerating assembly compared to hand-sewing. Further mechanization came with lasting machines, which shaped the upper over a foot-shaped form (last) and prepared it for sole attachment—a bottleneck in manual production. In , formed the McKay Lasting Machine Association to develop such devices, building on earlier efforts. The breakthrough arrived in 1883 when patented an automatic lasting machine on March 20, capable of gripping the upper, pulling it over the last, and tacking it in place with precision, boosting productivity from about 50 pairs per day manually to up to 700 pairs per operator. These advancements converged in the United States, particularly in centers like Lynn and Haverhill, where factories proliferated in the late 19th century, drawing on regional leatherworking traditions. The 1899 formation of the United Shoe Machinery Company through mergers of firms like McKay's and Goodyear's consolidated control over these technologies, leasing machines to manufacturers and dominating global shoe mechanization into the . Vulcanized rubber soles, pioneered by Charles Goodyear's 1839 process and applied to by 1844, complemented these machines by providing durable, weather-resistant bottoms suitable for mass output. In , adoption of American machinery spurred factory growth, notably in , , where the industry expanded rapidly in the to meet domestic and imperial demand, though initial innovations lagged behind U.S. developments. Overall, industrialization shifted shoe production from craftsmanship to scalable , lowering prices and increasing accessibility, while standardizing sizes and fits for broader markets.

Post-1945 Innovations and Globalization

The end of marked a turning point for the shoe industry, with the lifting shoe on October 30, 1945, which had limited consumers to three pairs annually, thereby unleashing pent-up demand and spurring production recovery. In Europe, brands like , founded by in 1949, and Puma, established by his brother Rudolf in 1948, capitalized on post-war athletic resurgence by developing specialized sports footwear, including Adidas's screw-in cleats for soccer boots debuted at the . These innovations emphasized performance, with Adidas securing over 700 patents by the 1950s for running shoe designs that dominated Olympic endorsements. The and witnessed a surge in athletic shoe technology amid the boom, introducing synthetic materials like and EVA for midsoles, which provided superior cushioning over traditional and rubber. Nike, rebranded from Blue Ribbon Sports in 1971, pioneered the waffle-patterned rubber outsole in 1974, inspired by Bill Bowerman's experiment, enhancing traction and reducing weight. Further advancements included Nike's Air cushioning system, patented in 1979, which incorporated pressurized gas pockets for impact absorption, revolutionizing running shoes and expanding into models like the Air Force 1 in 1982. countered with the Torsion system in the , allowing independent forefoot and rearfoot flexion to mimic natural gait. Globalization transformed manufacturing, as Western brands outsourced production to starting in the to leverage lower labor costs, initially to and later and . By the , emerged as the dominant producer, accounting for much of the industry's growth from nearly 10 billion pairs annually at the decade's start. This shift enabled through injection molding and automated assembly, reducing costs but contributing to the decline of domestic footwear jobs in the and Europe, with imports rising sharply post-NAFTA in 1994. Today, countries like and supplement China's output, sustaining global supply chains amid annual production exceeding 20 billion pairs.

Design and Construction

Core Components

The core components of a shoe form its foundational structure, enabling protection, support, and mobility for the foot. These elements include the upper, which envelops the foot; the sole, which interfaces with the ground; and the , which provides elevation and stability at the rear. Additional supporting features, such as the insole and shank, contribute to internal comfort and rigidity. The upper constitutes the majority of the shoe's exterior above the sole, typically comprising the vamp—the front section covering the toes and instep—quarters that form the sides and back, and a lining for internal smoothness. Constructed from , fabric, or synthetic materials, the upper secures to the foot via laces, straps, or elastic, while the heel counter, a stiffened insert in the quarters, maintains shape and prevents slippage. The sole assembly divides into three layers: the outsole, which contacts the ground and offers traction through treads or patterns; the midsole, providing cushioning and shock absorption often via foam or air pockets; and the insole or footbed, which supports the foot's arch and wicks moisture. In athletic shoes, midsoles incorporate technologies like EVA foam for energy return, enhancing performance during impact. The , integral to the sole or upper, elevates the rear foot, distributing weight and aiding in heeled designs, with components like the heel stack layered for durability in formal . A metal shank between the insole and outsole reinforces the arch, preventing collapse under load, particularly in dress shoes or boots. These components interlock via stitching, cementing, or welted construction, varying by shoe type for flexibility or rigidity.

Materials and Assembly Methods

Shoes primarily utilize , textiles, rubber, foams, and in their construction, with dominating uppers for durability and breathability while synthetics prevail in soles for traction and cushioning. Common leathers include full-grain , which retains the natural surface for superior strength, for suppleness, and derived from the inner hide for a napped texture. Synthetic alternatives such as (PU) and (TPU) mimic 's flexibility but offer resistance to water and abrasion, often used in or performance footwear. (EVA) foam serves as a midsole , providing impact absorption due to its cellular . Assembly begins with preparing the upper, typically cut from patterns and stitched using techniques like gores or brogue perforations, then reinforced with linings and counters for structure. Lasting follows, where the upper is stretched over a wooden or last—a foot-shaped mold—to conform to the intended shape, secured by tacks, staples, or adhesives depending on the method. Bottoming attaches the sole assembly, encompassing insole, midsole, and outsole, via varied techniques tailored to durability and cost. Goodyear welt construction, patented in 1867, involves machine-stitching the upper and insole to a ribbed welt strip, followed by sewing the welt to a stacked sole, enabling resoling without damaging the upper and enhancing water resistance through cork filling. Cemented construction, prevalent in athletic and casual shoes, glues the pre-formed sole directly to the lasted upper after roughening surfaces for adhesion, prioritizing lightweight production but yielding lower resoleability. Vulcanized methods heat-mold rubber soles onto canvas uppers, as in early sneakers, bonding via sulfur cross-linking for flexibility in casual designs. Blake stitching threads the sole directly through the insole to the upper, producing a slim profile suited to dress shoes but prone to water ingress if worn wet. Finishing processes include edge trimming, burnishing, and polishing to refine aesthetics and functionality.

Types and Variations

Functional Categories

Protective footwear, often termed safety or occupational shoes, is engineered to shield the foot from industrial hazards such as falling objects, compression, punctures, and electrical conduction. Under ASTM F2413 standards, certified protective shoes must withstand at least 75 foot-pounds of impact and 2,500 pounds of compression in the toe area, with options for metatarsal guards against overhead strikes and puncture-resistant soles rated to 1,000 pounds of force. , composite, or toes provide the core reinforcement, while slip-resistant outsoles prevent falls in oily or wet environments common to , , and food service. These designs prioritize durability over flexibility, often incorporating properties for electrical hazard protection up to 18,000 volts. Athletic footwear supports physical exertion across sports and exercise, emphasizing biomechanical efficiency through features like midsole cushioning (e.g., EVA foam or air pockets for shock absorption), arch stabilization, and traction patterns tailored to surfaces such as courts or trails. Running shoes typically feature curved rocker soles to promote forward propulsion and reduce heel strike impact, while basketball variants include high-ankle collars and multidirectional treads for lateral stability. Classification as athletic requires suitability for vigorous activities, distinguishing it from casual shoes by enhanced support to mitigate overuse injuries like or . Therapeutic and orthopedic shoes address medical conditions by incorporating corrective elements such as rigid shanks for pronation control, extra-depth interiors for custom insoles, and wide toe boxes to alleviate on bunions or hammertoes. These differ from standard casual by focusing on alignment and load distribution, often recommended for conditions like or to prevent ulcers or joint degeneration. integrate patented heel-hugging technologies or metatarsal to dynamically support the foot's natural motion, reducing fatigue during prolonged standing. Specialized performance categories include shoes, optimized for precise movement; pointe shoes for , constructed with hardened toe boxes (blocks) from layers of fabric and glue to enable weight-bearing on the tips for up to eight hours of rehearsal, though they increase stress on Achilles tendons and metatarsals. or variants use soles for pivot friction and flexible uppers to facilitate turns and extensions, balancing grip with minimal restriction. Casual and dress shoes, by contrast, serve general ambulation or formal settings with uppers and modest heels for , offering basic cushioning but lacking the reinforcements of protective or athletic types.

Aesthetic and Cultural Styles

Shoe aesthetics emphasize visual appeal, silhouette enhancement, and symbolic expression, often prioritizing form over function in fashion contexts. High-heeled shoes, for instance, elongate the leg and alter posture to convey height and grace, tracing origins to 17th-century Europe where Louis XIV popularized them in 1660s France as a status marker for aristocracy, with red heels denoting court privilege. Platforms and wedges, revived in 1970s disco culture, similarly elevate stature while distributing weight differently from stilettos. Cultural styles of footwear reflect environmental adaptations, social hierarchies, and rituals across societies. Dutch wooden clogs (klompen), carved from willow since the 13th century, provided waterproof protection for farmers navigating marshy terrain, their upturned toes preventing slippage. Japanese geta, elevated wooden sandals dating to the (794–1185 CE), kept feet dry from streets and sewage while signaling or status through lacquered finishes. Native American moccasins, soft-soled deerskin shoes from pre-Columbian eras, incorporated and post-1600s European trade, denoting tribal affiliation and personal narratives. In , Indian juttis—flat, embroidered shoes from —evolved from Mughal influences in the 16th century, blending motifs for bridal and festive wear to signify prosperity. African styles like Ethiopian , hand-stitched since ancient times, prioritize durability in arid climates yet feature geometric incisions for aesthetic identity. Contemporary global fashion fuses these, as seen in designer reinterpretations like beaded moccasin-inspired loafers or elevated geta platforms, though often dilutes original cultural craftsmanship.

Sizing and Ergonomics

Measurement Standards

Shoe measurement standards primarily assess foot as the foundational , with width and girth incorporated in some systems to account for anatomical variations. These standards derive from empirical foot measurements, typically expressed in increments reflecting historical units like the barleycorn (approximately 1/3 inch or 8.46 mm) in Anglo-American systems or the Paris point (2/3 cm or 6.67 mm) in continental European ones. Early standardization efforts trace to 1324, when King Edward II of decreed the inch equivalent to three barleycorns, establishing a basis for shoe in increments of one barleycorn per size, a practice that persisted in and systems. In the and , sizing follows the barleycorn system, where adult sizes increase by 1/3 inch (one barleycorn) per full , with half-sizes at 1/6 inch; men's sizes start from a baseline of about 8 2/3 inches for size 0, while women's scales adjust downward by 1.5 sizes relative to men's for equivalent length. Width designations, such as AAA (narrowest) to EEE (widest) in standards, add 3/16 inch per width letter increment beyond medium (D for men, B for women), measured at the ball of the foot. This system was formalized in 1880 by Edwin Simpson, who introduced standardized lasts in full and half sizes using the 1/3-inch progression. European sizing employs the Paris point, where each size corresponds to 2/3 cm (about 0.26 inches), often labeled in whole numbers approximating foot length in centimeters divided by 1.5 (e.g., a 27 cm foot yields size 40). In modern athletic and sneaker brands such as Nike, particularly in general and Asian market charts, foot lengths of 25-28 cm typically correspond to men's sizes as follows: 25 cm (US 7, EU 40, UK 6); 26 cm (US 8, EU 41, UK 7); 27 cm (US 9, EU 42.5-43, UK 8); 28 cm (US 10, EU 44, UK 9). Sizes vary slightly by brand; half sizes and exact EU equivalents may differ. Japanese sizes often match the cm value directly (e.g., 25 cm ≈ JP 25). For women, this range corresponds to larger sizes (e.g., US women's 9-12). Always refer to brand-specific charts and add 0.5-1 cm allowance for comfort. Unlike length-based systems, some manufacturers denote sizes directly in centimeters (e.g., 26 cm), though inconsistencies arise due to varying allowances for toe room. Widths are less uniformly standardized, often using letters or numbers, but girth measurements around the instep or ball may supplement in bespoke or orthopedic contexts. The Mondopoint system, codified in ISO 9407:2019, represents a metric-based international effort, designating size by foot in millimeters (e.g., 260 for a 260 mm foot) with optional width in millimeters (e.g., 260/100). Originating from ISO 2816:1973, it prioritizes direct foot measurement over historical units, facilitating global conversions by focusing on empirical dimensions rather than regional scales. Despite adoption in and some athletic , proliferation remains limited due to entrenched national systems. Practical measurement relies on devices like the , patented in 1925 by Charles Brannock, which gauges foot length, arch length, and width simultaneously for precise fitting; length is read from heel-to-toe alignment, with arch length ensuring support matching. This tool underpins US industry standards, recommending socks of intended thickness during measurement and verifying against shoe lasts, which incorporate 10-15 mm of allowance beyond foot length for movement. ISO 19410-1:2022 further standardizes in-shoe length measurement at 20 mm toe height for adults, validating effective accommodation. Variations persist across regions—e.g., Chinese sizes in mm akin to Mondopoint, Japanese in cm—necessitating conversion charts, though no universal enforcement exists beyond ISO recommendations.

Fitting Principles and Common Issues

Proper shoe fitting begins with measuring both feet, as is common, with the shoe sized to the larger foot to prevent uneven pressure and alterations. Measurements are best taken in the late afternoon or evening, when feet have expanded due to daily activity and fluid accumulation, ensuring a more accurate representation of maximum foot volume. A key principle is allowing approximately 1.27 cm (1/2 inch, or thumb's width) of space between the longest and the shoe's end, accommodating natural toe splay, swelling during motion, and forward foot slide without risking jamming or instability. The midfoot vamp must conform snugly to secure the foot laterally without , while the counter provides firm rear hold to minimize slippage, which can exceed 1 cm in loose fits and lead to compensatory muscle strain. Fitting should occur while standing and walking in the intended socks or , as alters foot length by up to 1 cm and width by 0.5 cm; when using thick insoles, insert them prior to trying on, then walk to ensure approximately 1 cm space ahead of the longest toe (able to fit one finger), the rear foot is not pressing against the heel counter, and no ankle slipping occurs, preferring slightly large over small as leather shoes expand with wear. Shoes must match foot shape rather than relying solely on numerical size, considering arch height, pronation patterns, and activity demands like cushioning for high-impact sports. Immediate comfort is essential, with no expectation of a break-in period, as rigid adaptation risks friction-induced damage. Common issues from suboptimal fitting include blisters from shear forces in tight or , corns and calluses from localized pressure on bony prominences, and lesser deformities such as hammertoes from cramped flexors. Narrow or pointed shoes elevate risks of hallux valgus (bunions) by compressing the metatarsophalangeal , with prevalence linked to footwear width restrictions in longitudinal studies, while excessive elevation shifts weight anteriorly, contributing to and neuromas like Morton's from interdigital nerve impingement. Loose fits promote slip and instability, increasing ankle inversion sprains by up to 50% in dynamic activities, and inadequate arch support in flat or high-arched feet can precipitate through repetitive microtrauma to the plantar . Ingrown toenails arise from lateral nail compression in tight widths, and chronic mismatches exacerbate conditions like via sustained irritation.

Cultural and Social Dimensions

Symbolism and Status Hierarchies

Shoes have historically served as visible markers of , with elaborate or restricted designs denoting elite access to resources and leisure. In medieval , particularly during the 14th and 15th centuries, elongated poulaines or crakows—shoes with pointed toes extending up to two feet—signaled and idleness among the , as their impracticality required servants for mobility and craftsmanship from scarce materials. Similarly, ancient Egyptian elite wore or palm adorned with jewels and embroidery, distinguishing them from commoners who used simpler plaited versions, thereby reinforcing hierarchical visibility through sumptuary displays. High-heeled footwear exemplifies a shift in gendered symbolism tied to power dynamics. Originating in 16th-century Persian for stability, heels transitioned to European aristocracy by the early as emblems of and , with King of mandating red heels in 1672 for court nobles to symbolize royal favor and exclusivity. This persisted until the , when heels became feminized, yet retained status connotations; empirical research confirms that wearing heels today elevates perceived among observers, independent of power attributions, due to associations with formality and elevation. In contemporary contexts, shoes influence rapid social judgments, with empirical studies demonstrating that observers accurately infer traits like income and from alone, linking luxury brands to higher socioeconomic perceptions. Non-conforming styles, such as red sneakers, paradoxically signal elevated competence and status by implying financial security to flout norms, as shown in experiments where wearers were rated higher in professional evaluations. Across cultures, shoes embody ontological mobility and identity boundaries, from Hermes' winged denoting divine prowess in to modern all-white sneakers connoting effortless wealth through maintenance demands. These patterns underscore causal links between ostentation and hierarchical signaling, rooted in resource asymmetry rather than mere .

Etiquette, Taboos, and Removal Customs

In many East Asian cultures, such as , Korea, , and , removing shoes upon entering a home is a longstanding custom rooted in and respect for the living space, with dedicated entry areas like the Japanese serving as transitional zones where outdoor footwear is changed for indoor or . This practice prevents tracking dirt, , and pollutants indoors, reflecting a practical acknowledgment of shoes' exposure to urban grime and rural mud. In , failure to remove shoes can be seen as disrespectful, potentially signaling disregard for the host's standards, and the custom extends to schools, traditional inns, and certain public spaces like kindergartens. Religious and sacred contexts worldwide enforce shoe removal as a symbol of and purity, drawing from ancient traditions in the , , and Vedic practices. In Hindu temples and Vedic-derived sites, entering with shoes is prohibited to honor the sanctity of the space, as footwear is viewed as carrying impurities from the ground; this stems from scriptural norms where bare feet signify reverence toward divine areas. Similarly, mosques in Islamic cultures require removal before halls to maintain cleanliness, with origins in prophetic traditions emphasizing separation of profane outdoor elements from holy ground. In Thai and Vietnamese temples, the act underscores spiritual purification, barring shoes to avoid contaminating altars or areas with external defilement. Certain taboos associate shoes with uncleanliness or disrespect, particularly in Middle Eastern and South Asian societies, where displaying the soles of shoes—whether by crossing legs to flash them or intentionally showing them—conveys , as soles are deemed contaminated by contact with and . In Arab cultures, this stems from a broader cultural aversion to feet as impure, making sole exposure akin to a of , historically amplified in diplomatic incidents like the 2008 shoe-throwing at U.S. President in . In Mexico, placing shoes upside down in doorways is avoided as it invites bad luck, per folk beliefs tying footwear orientation to household fortune. Superstitions elsewhere, such as not stepping over another's shoes in some European traditions, arise from fears of inviting misfortune by "trampling" personal boundaries. In Western cultures like the and , shoe removal indoors is less obligatory, often depending on host preference or weather conditions, though post-2020 hygiene awareness from pandemics has increased voluntary adoption in urban homes to reduce transfer. advises guests to observe or inquire upon arrival—such as asking "Should I remove my shoes?"—to align with local norms, avoiding imposition in shoe-on households while respecting removal mandates elsewhere; in multicultural settings, hosts may provide to facilitate compliance without discomfort. Breaches, like entering a no-shoes shod, can strain social relations by implying entitlement over cleanliness protocols.

Health and Physiological Effects

Protective and Supportive Roles

Shoes primarily protect the feet from mechanical hazards such as punctures, impacts, and abrasions encountered on rough terrain or in occupational environments. For instance, safety footwear with steel toe caps can withstand compressive forces up to 75 foot-pounds, significantly reducing risks in industries like and . Empirical studies confirm that protective footwear lowers slip risks and occupational foot injuries, with older workers benefiting from slip-resistant soles that improve traction on contaminated floors. Compared to conditions, shod walking provides a barrier against sharp objects and extreme temperatures, as evidenced by archaeological findings of early footwear designed for dating back over 5,000 years. In supportive roles, shoes mitigate impact forces through cushioning materials in midsoles, which absorb shock during locomotion and reduce peak ground reaction forces by up to 20% in running scenarios. Arch-supporting insoles enhance foot stability, particularly for individuals with , yielding symptom improvements in up to 75.5% of cases involving leg alignment issues. Peer-reviewed research indicates that well-cushioned footwear contributes to by distributing pressure evenly, though benefits are more pronounced in high-impact activities than in morphology-specific prescriptions. For children, supportive shoes help prevent developmental pathologies by maintaining proper alignment during growth phases. However, excessive support can weaken intrinsic foot muscles over time, as minimalist designs promote strengthening and better , suggesting a balance between and natural function for long-term . In athletic contexts, technologically advanced shoes with energy-return foams not only cushion but also enhance performance while lowering biomechanical loading on joints. Overall, while shoes offer verifiable protective and supportive advantages over exposure in modern settings, optimal designs prioritize evidence-based features like adequate cushioning without over-reliance on rigid structures.

Pathologies Linked to Footwear Use

Ill-fitting , particularly shoes with narrow toe boxes or inadequate space, exerts chronic pressure on the forefoot, contributing to the development of hallux valgus (bunions), where the big toe deviates laterally toward the lesser toes. Systematic reviews indicate that characteristics such as tight-fitting shoes and high-heeled designs are associated with increased hallux valgus prevalence, though multifactorial etiology including and age also plays a role, with acting as a modifiable rather than sole cause. Women regularly wearing high-heeled shoes exhibit higher plantar pressures on the hallux, correlating with greater transverse flatness of the foot and lateral hallux flexion compared to those in low-heeled or flat . Lesser toe deformities, including hammertoes and claw toes, arise from compressive forces in constrictive footwear, leading to joint contractures and misalignment. Evidence from narrative reviews links poorly fitted shoes to these conditions through sustained toe crowding and , exacerbating flexion deformities over time. Tight shoes also promote corns, calluses, and blisters via localized and shear, with studies reporting these dermatological issues in up to 33% of individuals in restrictive occupational footwear. Metatarsalgia and neuromas, such as , result from elevated forefoot loading in shoes lacking sufficient cushioning or width, compressing interdigital nerves and soft tissues. In children, habitual shod populations show higher flatfoot incidence—up to elevated rates in large cohorts of over 2,300—due to restricted natural foot spreading and arch development compared to groups. Safety and occupational footwear often amplifies these risks, with surveys documenting foot pain in 49% of wearers from rigidity and poor fit, alongside increased formation. High-heeled shoes alter , shifting weight anteriorly and increasing and ankle stress, which correlates with musculoskeletal but shows inconsistent evidence for inducing or irreversible deformities in otherwise healthy adults. Overall, while protective mitigates injury in hazardous environments, deviations from foot morphology in —such as excessive tightness or elevation—causally contribute to via mechanical overload, underscoring the need for proper to minimize risks.

Economic and Manufacturing Landscape

Production Processes and Supply Chains

The production of shoes encompasses a sequence of labor-intensive processes beginning with material preparation and culminating in finishing. Raw hides for uppers undergo tanning, primarily via chrome tanning, which involves immersing hides in solutions to stabilize fibers and prevent , a process that typically completes in 24 hours and accounts for the majority of shoe due to its efficiency and softness. Vegetable tanning, using from tree bark or leaves, takes weeks to months and produces firmer, more water-resistant suited for durable footwear. Synthetic materials, such as (PU), (EVA), and rubber, derive from feedstocks; rubber soles, for instance, are compounded from natural or synthetic , molded under and in hydraulic presses. Following material preparation, patterns are created from 3D lasts—wooden or molds replicating foot shapes—and used to cut components via die-clicking machines for uppers, linings, and counters. Uppers are then stitched in a closing operation, assembling quarters, vamps, and linings with precision to form the foundational structure. Lasting shapes the upper over the last using adhesives or tacks, pulling it taut to conform to the foot's contours, after which soles are attached through methods like cementing, stitching (e.g., ), or direct injection molding for athletic shoes. Final finishing includes edge trimming, polishing, and quality inspection to ensure durability and aesthetics. Global supply chains for footwear are highly concentrated in Asia, which produced 88% of the world's 23.9 billion pairs in 2024, driven by low labor costs, established infrastructure, and proximity to synthetic material suppliers. China dominates with approximately 55% of output, manufacturing 12.3 billion pairs in 2023, sourcing hides domestically or from Brazil and Australia while importing petrochemicals for synthetics. Vietnam follows as the second-largest producer at 1.5 billion pairs annually, specializing in export-oriented athletic and casual shoes with supply chains integrating Vietnamese assembly and Indonesian or Chinese components. India and Indonesia contribute significantly, with India focusing on leather goods from its tanneries in Kanpur and synthetics from petrochemical hubs. These chains often involve tiered suppliers: Tier 1 for final assembly, Tier 2 for uppers and soles, and Tier 3 for raw materials, with logistics routed through ports like Ningbo (China) or Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam) to markets in Europe and North America. Disruptions, such as 2024 rubber price surges of 44.4% due to supply constraints, underscore vulnerabilities in material sourcing.

Market Dynamics and Trade Barriers

The global footwear market reached an estimated USD 457.9 billion in and is projected to grow to USD 476.83 billion in 2025, driven by rising demand in athletic and casual segments amid expansion and consumer preferences for sustainable materials. dominates production, accounting for 88% of output in with a 6.9% year-over-year increase, primarily due to low labor costs and established clusters in countries like and . Competition intensifies among major brands such as Nike and , which face supply chain vulnerabilities from overreliance on Asian suppliers, prompting diversification efforts like nearshoring to and investments, though challenger brands erode through models. Export dynamics favor volume growth over value, with global footwear exports rising 4.6% in volume in but stagnating in monetary terms due to pricing pressures and geopolitical tensions.
RankCountryExport Value (2024, USD billion)Share of Pairs Exported
146.99.2 billion pairs
2~10 (estimated from trends)Significant growth
3Varies, but top tierKey athletic supplier
leads as the top exporter with 9.2 billion pairs valued at USD 46.9 billion in 2024, followed by and , reflecting Asia's 85.1% share of global exports. Trade barriers, particularly , disrupt these dynamics by elevating import costs and incentivizing production shifts. In the United States, base tariffs average 11% but reach up to 37% for certain categories like children's shoes, compounded by Section 301 tariffs on Chinese averaging 25% since 2018, which have driven shoe prices up 1.4% in August 2025 alone—the sharpest monthly rise in 17 months. These measures, intensified under 2025 threats of up to 100% on Chinese imports, have prompted brands to relocate assembly to and , though incomplete diversification limits relief, resulting in sustained consumer price hikes estimated at 15% for shoes under proposed expansions. In the , non-tariff barriers such as stringent REACH chemical regulations and mandates add compliance costs, while retaliatory from the U.S.-China trade friction indirectly affect EU importers via global price volatility. from 2018-2020 tariff phases shows near-complete pass-through to U.S. consumers, with minimal domestic production gains, as importers absorb only marginal costs before raising retail prices. Such barriers foster resilience through multi-sourcing but exacerbate in labor-intensive sectors like , where 's overcapacity amplifies competitive distortions.

Environmental Footprint

Resource Consumption and Emissions

The production of entails significant resource inputs across materials, , and , primarily driven by global output of 22.4 billion pairs in 2023. A single pair often incorporates up to 40 distinct materials, including , rubber, synthetics, textiles, and adhesives, with extraction and processing accounting for the majority of upstream impacts. , used in formal and casual shoes, derives from animal hides requiring energy-intensive tanning, while synthetic alternatives like and rely on petroleum-based feedstocks. Water consumption is concentrated in material preparation, with shoe production demanding approximately 8,000 liters per pair, largely for hide processing and dyeing. This figure reflects embedded in supply chains, including for hides and chemical treatments, though synthetic reduces direct usage at the cost of other pollutants. Energy demands span extraction, fabrication, and assembly, with life cycle analyses reporting totals around 18 MJ per pair for representative models, predominantly from fuel-derived in developing-country factories. Greenhouse gas emissions from footwear manufacturing and lifecycle stages total about 6.7 kg CO₂-equivalent per pair, encompassing raw material production (over 70% of impact), fabrication, distribution, use, and disposal. This equates to roughly 150 million metric tons annually based on recent production volumes, representing under 0.5% of global emissions, with supply chain (Scope 3) activities—such as material sourcing in Asia—dominating over direct factory outputs of 1.5 kg CO₂ per shoe. Non-CO₂ emissions include volatile organic compounds from adhesives and methane from leather processing, though data variability arises from product type and regional energy grids.

Waste Generation and Disposal Challenges

The footwear industry generates substantial waste during production, with approximately 2.39 million tons of manufacturing waste produced in 2022 alongside 23.9 billion pairs of shoes. Post-consumer disposal exacerbates this, as global production of around 22 billion pairs annually in 2023 results in a comparable volume being discarded, predominantly ending in landfills due to limited . In the United States, about 300 million pairs are thrown away each year, with 95% directed to landfills. Recycling shoes presents formidable technical barriers, stemming from their composition of over 40 distinct materials—including synthetics, rubbers, adhesives, and metals—that resist efficient separation and processing. This heterogeneity necessitates complex disassembly, which current facilities often lack scalability for, leading to recycling rates as low as 13% for footwear-inclusive textiles. Collection logistics further complicate efforts, as decentralized drop-off systems and consumer habits favor incineration or landfilling over specialized recovery programs. Landfilled shoes contribute to long-term , with synthetic components persisting for 25 to 1,000 years without full , slowly leaching dyes, , and chemicals into and . This slow breakdown amplifies from anaerobic and occupies space equivalent to billions of pairs annually worldwide. Economic disincentives, such as higher costs for recycling versus landfilling, perpetuate reliance on disposal over circular models, despite initiatives like material into playground surfaces or . Advances in enzymatic breakdown or design-for-recyclability remain nascent, underscoring systemic challenges in aligning industry practices with minimization.

Controversies and Debates

Labor Conditions in Global Supply

The production of is concentrated in developing countries, particularly in , where factories often operate under substandard labor conditions characterized by low wages, excessive working hours, and inadequate safety measures. In , a leading exporter of shoes, workers commonly earn monthly wages equivalent to approximately $160–$200, frequently supplemented by mandatory exceeding 60 hours per week to meet production quotas. These conditions persist despite legal minimums, as factories prioritize cost reduction for global , resulting in earnings that fail to cover basic living expenses in urban hubs. Child labor remains a documented issue in footwear manufacturing across multiple countries, with the U.S. Department of Labor identifying its use in , , , , , and , where children as young as 5 years old engage in hazardous tasks such as stitching and gluing. In , child workers in shoe production often face bonded labor arrangements tied to family debts, exacerbating exploitation in informal workshops that supply larger factories. Similarly, forced labor contributes to footwear output in , including coerced adult and child involvement in assembly lines, particularly in regions with state-sponsored programs. These practices violate conventions, yet enforcement is inconsistent due to weak regulatory oversight and economic pressures on suppliers. Safety hazards in shoe factories include exposure to toxic glues and solvents, ergonomic strains from repetitive tasks, and risks from unguarded machinery, contributing to high rates of respiratory illnesses and injuries. Fires and structural failures, though less publicized than in apparel, have occurred in facilities in and , where overcrowding and flammable materials amplify dangers; for instance, investigations into suppliers for like revealed ongoing child trafficking and unsafe conditions in Chinese and Bangladeshi operations as of 2025. While corporate audits and codes of conduct aim to mitigate these issues, reports indicate limited effectiveness, as purchasing practices by often squeeze margins, incentivizing violations to maintain competitiveness. Independent assessments, such as those from the ILO, highlight that small-scale and subcontracted operations—prevalent in the sector—evade monitoring, perpetuating cycles of poor conditions despite incremental regulatory efforts.

Ethical Concerns Over Materials and Practices

The primary ethical concerns in shoe materials center on the use of animal-derived products, particularly , which constitutes a significant portion of premium . Leather production involves the slaughter of billions of animals annually worldwide, with hides being the most common source; global estimates indicate over 1 billion animals, including cows, pigs, goats, sheep, and exotic , are killed for their skins each year. These animals are frequently sourced from regions with minimal or unenforced welfare regulations, such as and , where investigations have documented practices including overcrowding in farms, stressful transportation—often without food or water—and inhumane slaughter methods like throat-slitting without prior stunning. While is often portrayed as a byproduct of the —mitigating claims that hides drive primary killings—ethical critiques persist due to inherent welfare deficits in industrial animal agriculture, including confinement in feedlots that restrict natural behaviors and routine use of painful procedures like dehorning without . No comprehensive global certification exists specifically for in leather supply chains, leading to gaps where consumers cannot verify humane treatment. Exotic leathers, such as those from kangaroos used in athletic shoes, have drawn particular scrutiny; Australian harvesting involves shooting during night culls, which groups argue inflicts undue suffering despite government claims of necessity, prompting major brands like Nike in March 2023 and and in May 2025 to phase out skins entirely. Synthetic alternatives like or PVC, while avoiding direct animal harm, introduce fewer material-specific ethical issues but are not immune to criticism over opaque sourcing; historical reports from highlighted risks of mislabeled or skins from entering global markets as generic , though U.S. trade pressures and cultural shifts have reduced such incidents. Practices in material processing, such as chrome tanning for durability, raise indirect ethical questions due to worker exposure risks in unregulated facilities, though these overlap with labor and domains. Overall, the absence of standardized ethical audits for non-animal materials underscores ongoing debates, with advocates urging transparency to prevent deceptive practices like unverified "eco-leather" claims that may conceal poor .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.