Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
| Car | |
|---|---|
The Ford Model T, produced from 1908 to 1927, is widely credited with being the first mass-affordable automobile, and it remains one of the best-selling cars of all time. | |
| Classification | Vehicle |
| Industry | Various |
| Application | Transportation |
| Fuel source | |
| Powered | Yes |
| Self-propelled | Yes |
| Wheels | 3–6, most often 4 |
| Axles | 2, less commonly 3 |
| Inventor | Carl Benz |
| Invented | 1886 |
A car, or an automobile, is a motor vehicle with wheels. Most definitions of cars state that they run primarily on roads, seat 1-8 people, have four wheels, and mainly transport people rather than cargo.[1][2] There are around 1.644 billion cars in use worldwide as of January 2025.[3]
The French inventor Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot built the first steam-powered road vehicle in 1769, while the Swiss inventor François Isaac de Rivaz designed and constructed the first internal combustion-powered automobile in 1808. The modern car—a practical, marketable automobile for everyday use—was invented in 1886, when the German inventor Carl Benz patented his Benz Patent-Motorwagen. Commercial cars became widely available during the 20th century. The 1901 Oldsmobile Curved Dash and the 1908 Ford Model T, both American cars, are widely considered the first mass-produced[4][5] and mass-affordable[6][7][8] cars, respectively. Cars were rapidly adopted in the US, where they replaced horse-drawn carriages.[9] In Europe and other parts of the world, demand for automobiles did not increase until after World War II.[10] In the 21st century, car usage is still increasing rapidly, especially in China, India, and other newly industrialised countries.[11][12]
Cars have controls for driving, parking, passenger comfort, and a variety of lamps. Over the decades, additional features and controls have been added to vehicles, making them progressively more complex. These include rear-reversing cameras, air conditioning, navigation systems, and in-car entertainment. Most cars in use in the early 2020s are propelled by an internal combustion engine, fueled by the combustion of fossil fuels. Electric cars, which were invented early in the history of the car, became commercially available in the 2000s and widespread in the 2020s. The transition from fossil fuel-powered cars to electric cars features prominently in most climate change mitigation scenarios.[13]
There are costs and benefits to car use. The costs to the individual include acquiring the vehicle, interest payments (if the car is financed), repairs and maintenance, fuel, depreciation, driving time, parking fees, taxes, and insurance.[14] The costs to society include resources used to produce cars and fuel, maintaining roads, land-use, road congestion, air pollution, noise pollution, public health, and disposing of the vehicle at the end of its life. Traffic collisions are the largest cause of injury-related deaths worldwide.[15] Personal benefits include on-demand transportation, mobility, independence, and convenience.[16][page needed] Societal benefits include economic benefits, such as job and wealth creation from the automotive industry, transportation provision, societal well-being from leisure and travel opportunities. People's ability to move flexibly from place to place has far-reaching implications for the nature of societies.[17]
Etymology
[edit]The English word car is believed to originate from Latin carrus/carrum "wheeled vehicle" or (via Old North French) Middle English carre "two-wheeled cart", both of which in turn derive from Gaulish karros "chariot".[18][19] It originally referred to any wheeled horse-drawn vehicle, such as a cart, carriage, or wagon.[20] The word also occurs in other Celtic languages.[21]
"Motor car", attested from 1895, is the usual formal term in British English.[2] "Autocar", a variant likewise attested from 1895 and literally meaning "self-propelled car", is now considered archaic.[22] "Horseless carriage" is attested from 1895.[23]
"Automobile", a classical compound derived from Ancient Greek autós (αὐτός) "self" and Latin mobilis "movable", entered English from French and was first adopted by the Automobile Club of Great Britain in 1897.[24] It fell out of favour in Britain and is now used chiefly in North America,[25] where the abbreviated form "auto" commonly appears as an adjective in compound formations like "auto industry" and "auto mechanic".[26][27]
History
[edit]This section may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a particular audience. Specifically, detail should be moved to main article and summarized here. (September 2022) |







In 1649, Hans Hautsch of Nuremberg built a clockwork-driven carriage.[30][31] The first steam-powered vehicle was designed by Ferdinand Verbiest, a Flemish member of a Jesuit mission in China around 1672. It was a 65-centimetre-long (26 in) scale-model toy for the Kangxi Emperor that was unable to carry a driver or a passenger.[16][32][33] It is not known with certainty if Verbiest's model was successfully built or run.[33]
Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot is widely credited with building the first full-scale, self-propelled mechanical vehicle in about 1769; he created a steam-powered tricycle.[34] He also constructed two steam tractors for the French Army, one of which is preserved in the French National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts.[34] His inventions were limited by problems with water supply and maintaining steam pressure.[34] In 1801, Richard Trevithick built and demonstrated his Puffing Devil road locomotive, believed by many to be the first demonstration of a steam-powered road vehicle. It was unable to maintain sufficient steam pressure for long periods and was of little practical use.
The development of external combustion (also known as steam) engines is detailed as part of the history of the car but often treated separately from the development of cars in their modern understanding. A variety of steam-powered road vehicles were used during the first part of the 19th century, including steam cars, steam buses, phaetons, and steam rollers. In the United Kingdom, sentiment against them led to the Locomotive Acts of 1865.
In 1807, Nicéphore Niépce and his brother Claude created what was probably the world's first internal combustion engine (which they called a Pyréolophore), but installed it in a boat on the river Saone in France.[35] Coincidentally, in 1807, the Swiss inventor François Isaac de Rivaz designed his own "de Rivaz internal combustion engine", and used it to develop the world's first vehicle to be powered by such an engine. The Niépces' Pyréolophore was fuelled by a mixture of Lycopodium powder (dried spores of the Lycopodium plant), finely crushed coal dust and resin that were mixed with oil, whereas de Rivaz used a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen.[35] Neither design was successful, as was the case with others, such as Samuel Brown, Samuel Morey, and Etienne Lenoir,[36] who each built vehicles (usually adapted carriages or carts) powered by internal combustion engines.[37]
In November 1881, French inventor Gustave Trouvé demonstrated a three-wheeled car powered by electricity at the International Exposition of Electricity.[38] Although several other German engineers (including Gottlieb Daimler, Wilhelm Maybach, and Siegfried Marcus) were working on cars at about the same time, the year 1886 is regarded as the birth year of the modern car—a practical, marketable automobile for everyday use—when the German Carl Benz patented his Benz Patent-Motorwagen; he is generally acknowledged as the inventor of the car.[37][39][40]
In 1879, Benz was granted a patent for his first engine, which had been designed in 1878. Many of his other inventions made the use of the internal combustion engine feasible for powering a vehicle. His first Motorwagen was built in 1885 in Mannheim, Germany. He was awarded the patent for its invention as of his application on 29 January 1886 (under the auspices of his major company, Benz & Cie., which was founded in 1883). Benz began promotion of the vehicle on 3 July 1886, and about 25 Benz vehicles were sold between 1888 and 1893, when his first four-wheeler was introduced along with a cheaper model. They also were powered with four-stroke engines of his own design. Emile Roger of France, already producing Benz engines under license, now added the Benz car to his line of products. Because France was more open to the early cars, initially more were built and sold in France through Roger than Benz sold in Germany. In August 1888, Bertha Benz, the wife and business partner of Carl Benz, undertook the first road trip by car, to prove the road-worthiness of her husband's invention.[41]
In 1896, Benz designed and patented the first internal-combustion flat engine, called boxermotor. During the last years of the 19th century, Benz was the largest car company in the world with 572 units produced in 1899 and, because of its size, Benz & Cie., became a joint-stock company. The first motor car in central Europe and one of the first factory-made cars in the world, was produced by Czech company Nesselsdorfer Wagenbau (later renamed to Tatra) in 1897, the Präsident automobil.
Daimler and Maybach founded Daimler Motoren Gesellschaft (DMG) in Cannstatt in 1890, and sold their first car in 1892 under the brand name Daimler. It was a horse-drawn stagecoach built by another manufacturer, which they retrofitted with an engine of their design. By 1895, about 30 vehicles had been built by Daimler and Maybach, either at the Daimler works or in the Hotel Hermann, where they set up shop after disputes with their backers. Benz, Maybach, and the Daimler team seem to have been unaware of each other's early work. They never worked together; by the time of the merger of the two companies, Daimler and Maybach were no longer part of DMG. Daimler died in 1900 and later that year, Maybach designed an engine named Daimler-Mercedes that was placed in a specially ordered model built to specifications set by Emil Jellinek. This was a production of a small number of vehicles for Jellinek to race and market in his country. Two years later, in 1902, a new model DMG car was produced and the model was named Mercedes after the Maybach engine, which generated 35 hp. Maybach quit DMG shortly thereafter and opened a business of his own. Rights to the Daimler brand name were sold to other manufacturers.
In 1890, Émile Levassor and Armand Peugeot of France began producing vehicles with Daimler engines, and so laid the foundation of the automotive industry in France. In 1891, Auguste Doriot and his Peugeot colleague Louis Rigoulot completed the longest trip by a petrol-driven vehicle when their self-designed and built Daimler powered Peugeot Type 3 completed 2,100 kilometres (1,300 mi) from Valentigney to Paris and Brest and back again. They were attached to the first Paris–Brest–Paris bicycle race, but finished six days after the winning cyclist, Charles Terront.
The first design for an American car with a petrol internal combustion engine was made in 1877 by George Selden of Rochester, New York. Selden applied for a patent for a car in 1879, but the patent application expired because the vehicle was never built. After a delay of 16 years and a series of attachments to his application, on 5 November 1895, Selden was granted a US patent (U.S. patent 549,160) for a two-stroke car engine, which hindered, more than encouraged, development of cars in the United States. His patent was challenged by Henry Ford and others, and overturned in 1911.
In 1893, the first running, petrol-driven American car was built and road-tested by the Duryea brothers of Springfield, Massachusetts. The first public run of the Duryea Motor Wagon took place on 21 September 1893, on Taylor Street in Metro Center Springfield.[42][43] Studebaker, subsidiary of a long-established wagon and coach manufacturer, started to build cars in 1897[44]: 66 and commenced sales of electric vehicles in 1902 and petrol vehicles in 1904.[45]
In Britain, there had been several attempts to build steam cars with varying degrees of success, with Thomas Rickett even attempting a production run in 1860.[46] Santler from Malvern is recognised by the Veteran Car Club of Great Britain as having made the first petrol-driven car in the country in 1894,[47] followed by Frederick William Lanchester in 1895, but these were both one-offs.[47] The first production vehicles in Great Britain came from the Daimler Company, a company founded by Harry J. Lawson in 1896, after purchasing the right to use the name of the engines. Lawson's company made its first car in 1897, and they bore the name Daimler.[47]
In 1892, German engineer Rudolf Diesel was granted a patent for a "New Rational Combustion Engine". In 1897, he built the first diesel engine.[37] Steam-, electric-, and petrol-driven vehicles competed for a few decades, with petrol internal combustion engines achieving dominance in the 1910s. Although various pistonless rotary engine designs have attempted to compete with the conventional piston and crankshaft design, only Mazda's version of the Wankel engine has had more than very limited success. All in all, it is estimated that over 100,000 patents created the modern automobile and motorcycle.[48]
Mass production
[edit]


Large-scale, production-line manufacturing of affordable cars was started by Ransom Olds in 1901 at his Oldsmobile factory in Lansing, Michigan, and based upon stationary assembly line techniques pioneered by Marc Isambard Brunel at the Portsmouth Block Mills, England, in 1802. The assembly line style of mass production and interchangeable parts had been pioneered in the US by Thomas Blanchard in 1821, at the Springfield Armory in Springfield, Massachusetts.[49] This concept was greatly expanded by Henry Ford, beginning in 1913 with the world's first moving assembly line for cars at the Highland Park Ford Plant.
As a result, Ford's cars came off the line in 15-minute intervals, much faster than previous methods, increasing productivity eightfold, while using less manpower (from 12.5 manhours to 1 hour 33 minutes).[50] It was so successful, paint became a bottleneck. Only Japan black would dry fast enough, forcing the company to drop the variety of colours available before 1913, until fast-drying Duco lacquer was developed in 1926. This is the source of Ford's apocryphal remark, "any color as long as it's black".[50] In 1914, an assembly line worker could buy a Model T with four months' pay.[50]
Ford's complex safety procedures—especially assigning each worker to a specific location instead of allowing them to roam about—dramatically reduced the rate of injury.[51] The combination of high wages and high efficiency is called "Fordism" and was copied by most major industries. The efficiency gains from the assembly line also coincided with the economic rise of the US. The assembly line forced workers to work at a certain pace with very repetitive motions which led to more output per worker while other countries were using less productive methods.
In the automotive industry, its success was dominating, and quickly spread worldwide seeing the founding of Ford France and Ford Britain in 1911, Ford Denmark 1923, Ford Germany 1925; in 1921, Citroën was the first native European manufacturer to adopt the production method. Soon, companies had to have assembly lines, or risk going bankrupt; by 1930, 250 companies which did not, had disappeared.[50]
Development of automotive technology was rapid, due in part to the hundreds of small manufacturers competing to gain the world's attention. Key developments included electric ignition and the electric self-starter (both by Charles Kettering, for the Cadillac Motor Company in 1910–1911), independent suspension, and four-wheel brakes.
Since the 1920s, nearly all cars have been mass-produced to meet market needs, so marketing plans often have heavily influenced car design. It was Alfred P. Sloan who established the idea of different makes of cars produced by one company, called the General Motors Companion Make Program, so that buyers could "move up" as their fortunes improved.
Reflecting the rapid pace of change, makers shared parts with one another so larger production volume resulted in lower costs for each price range. For example, in the 1930s, LaSalles, sold by Cadillac, used cheaper mechanical parts made by Oldsmobile; in the 1950s, Chevrolet shared bonnet, doors, roof, and windows with Pontiac; by the 1990s, corporate powertrains and shared platforms (with interchangeable brakes, suspension, and other parts) were common. Even so, only major makers could afford high costs, and even companies with decades of production, such as Apperson, Cole, Dorris, Haynes, or Premier, could not manage: of some two hundred American car makers in existence in 1920, only 43 survived in 1930, and with the Great Depression, by 1940, only 17 of those were left.[50]
In Europe, much the same would happen. Morris set up its production line at Cowley in 1924, and soon outsold Ford, while beginning in 1923 to follow Ford's practice of vertical integration, buying Hotchkiss' British subsidiary (engines), Wrigley (gearboxes), and Osberton (radiators), for instance, as well as competitors, such as Wolseley: in 1925, Morris had 41 per cent of total British car production. Most British small-car assemblers, from Abbey to Xtra, had gone under. Citroën did the same in France, coming to cars in 1919; between them and other cheap cars in reply such as Renault's 10CV and Peugeot's 5CV, they produced 550,000 cars in 1925, and Mors, Hurtu, and others could not compete.[50] Germany's first mass-manufactured car, the Opel 4PS Laubfrosch (Tree Frog), came off the line at Rüsselsheim in 1924, soon making Opel the top car builder in Germany, with 37.5 per cent of the market.[50]
In Japan, car production was very limited before World War II. Only a handful of companies were producing vehicles in limited numbers, and these were small, three-wheeled for commercial uses, like Daihatsu, or were the result of partnering with European companies, like Isuzu building the Wolseley A-9 in 1922. Mitsubishi was also partnered with Fiat and built the Mitsubishi Model A based on a Fiat vehicle. Toyota, Nissan, Suzuki, Mazda, and Honda began as companies producing non-automotive products before the war, switching to car production during the 1950s. Kiichiro Toyoda's decision to take Toyoda Loom Works into automobile manufacturing would create what would eventually become Toyota Motor Corporation, the largest automobile manufacturer in the world. Subaru, meanwhile, was formed from a conglomerate of six companies who banded together as Fuji Heavy Industries, as a result of having been broken up under keiretsu legislation.
Components and design
[edit]Propulsion and fuels
[edit]

Fossil fuels
[edit]Most cars in use in the mid 2020s run on petrol burnt in an internal combustion engine (ICE). Some cities ban older more polluting petrol-driven cars and some countries plan to ban sales in future. However, some environmental groups say this phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles must be brought forwards to limit climate change. Production of petrol-fuelled cars peaked in 2017.[53][54]
Other hydrocarbon fossil fuels also burnt by deflagration (rather than detonation) in ICE cars include diesel, autogas, and CNG. Removal of fossil fuel subsidies,[55][56] concerns about oil dependence, tightening environmental laws and restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions are propelling work on alternative power systems for cars. This includes hybrid vehicles, plug-in electric vehicles and hydrogen vehicles. As of 2025 one in four cars sold is electric but,[57] despite rapid growth, less than one in twenty cars on the world's roads were fully electric and plug-in hybrid cars by the end of 2024.[58] Cars for racing or speed records have sometimes employed jet or rocket engines, but these are impractical for common use. Oil consumption has increased rapidly in the 20th and 21st centuries because there are more cars; the 1980s oil glut even fuelled the sales of low-economy vehicles in OECD countries.[citation needed]
Batteries
[edit]In almost all hybrid (even mild hybrid) and pure electric cars regenerative braking recovers and returns to a battery some energy which would otherwise be wasted by friction brakes getting hot.[59] Although all cars must have friction brakes (front disc brakes and either disc or drum rear brakes[60]) for emergency stops, regenerative braking improves efficiency, particularly in city driving.[61]
User interface
[edit]
Cars are equipped with controls used for driving, passenger comfort, and safety, normally operated by a combination of the use of feet and hands, and occasionally by voice on 21st-century cars. These controls include a steering wheel, pedals for operating the brakes and controlling the car's speed (and, in a manual transmission car, a clutch pedal), a shift lever or stick for changing gears, and a number of buttons and dials for turning on lights, ventilation, and other functions. Modern cars' controls are now standardised, such as the location for the accelerator and brake, but this was not always the case. Controls are evolving in response to new technologies, for example, the electric car and the integration of mobile communications.
Some of the original controls are no longer required. For example, all cars once had controls for the choke valve, clutch, ignition timing, and a crank instead of an electric starter. However, new controls have also been added to vehicles, making them more complex. These include air conditioning, navigation systems, and in-car entertainment. Another trend is the replacement of physical knobs and switches by secondary controls with touchscreen controls such as BMW's iDrive and Ford's MyFord Touch. Another change is that while early cars' pedals were physically linked to the brake mechanism and throttle, in the early 2020s, cars have increasingly replaced these physical linkages with electronic controls.
Electronics and interior
[edit]Cars are typically equipped with interior lighting which can be toggled manually or be set to light up automatically with doors open, an entertainment system which originated from car radios, sideways windows which can be lowered or raised electrically (manually on earlier cars), and one or multiple auxiliary power outlets for supplying portable appliances such as mobile phones, portable fridges, power inverters, and electrical air pumps from the on-board electrical system.[62][63][a] More costly upper-class and luxury cars are equipped with features earlier such as massage seats and collision avoidance systems.[64][65]
Dedicated automotive fuses and circuit breakers prevent damage from electrical overload.
Lighting
[edit]
Cars are typically fitted with multiple types of lights. These include headlights, which are used to illuminate the way ahead and make the car visible to other users, so that the vehicle can be used at night; in some jurisdictions, daytime running lights; red brake lights to indicate when the brakes are applied; amber turn signal lights to indicate the turn intentions of the driver; white-coloured reverse lights to illuminate the area behind the car (and indicate that the driver will be or is reversing); and on some vehicles, additional lights (e.g., side marker lights) to increase the visibility of the car. Interior lights on the ceiling of the car are usually fitted for the driver and passengers. Some vehicles also have a boot light and, more rarely, an engine compartment light.
Weight and size
[edit]
During the late 20th and early 21st century, cars increased in weight due to batteries,[67] modern steel safety cages, anti-lock brakes, airbags, and "more-powerful—if more efficient—engines"[68] and, as of 2019[update], typically weigh between 1 and 3 tonnes (1.1 and 3.3 short tons; 0.98 and 2.95 long tons).[69] Heavier cars are safer for the driver from a crash perspective, but more dangerous for other vehicles and road users.[68] The weight of a car influences fuel consumption and performance, with more weight resulting in increased fuel consumption and decreased performance. The Wuling Hongguang Mini EV, a typical city car, weighs about 700 kilograms (1,500 lb). Heavier cars include SUVs and extended-length SUVs like the Suburban. Cars have also become wider.[70]
Some places tax heavier cars more:[71] as well as improving pedestrian safety this can encourage manufacturers to use materials such as recycled aluminium instead of steel.[72] It has been suggested that one benefit of subsidising charging infrastructure is that cars can use lighter batteries.[73]
Seating and body style
[edit]Most cars are designed to carry multiple occupants, often with four or five seats. Cars with five seats typically seat two passengers in the front and three in the rear. Full-size cars and large sport utility vehicles can often carry six, seven, or more occupants depending on the arrangement of the seats. On the other hand, sports cars are most often designed with only two seats. Utility vehicles like pickup trucks, combine seating with extra cargo or utility functionality. The differing needs for passenger capacity and their luggage or cargo space has resulted in the availability of a large variety of body styles to meet individual consumer requirements that include, among others, the sedan/saloon, hatchback, station wagon/estate, coupe, and minivan.
Safety
[edit]
Traffic collisions are the largest cause of injury-related deaths worldwide.[15] Mary Ward became one of the first documented car fatalities in 1869 in Parsonstown, Ireland,[74] and Henry Bliss one of the US's first pedestrian car casualties in 1899 in New York City.[75] There are now standard tests for safety in new cars, such as the Euro and US NCAP tests,[76] and insurance-industry-backed tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).[77] However, not all such tests consider the safety of people outside the car, such as drivers of other cars, pedestrians and cyclists.[78] Some countries are tightening safety regulations for new cars, for example to mandate data recorders and automated braking.[79]
Costs and benefits
[edit]
The costs of car usage, which may include the cost of: acquiring the vehicle, repairs and auto maintenance, fuel, depreciation, driving time, parking fees, taxes, and insurance,[14] are weighed against the cost of the alternatives, and the value of the benefits—perceived and real—of vehicle usage. The benefits may include on-demand transportation, mobility, independence, and convenience,[16][page needed] and emergency power.[81] During the 1920s, cars had another benefit: "[c]ouples finally had a way to head off on unchaperoned dates, plus they had a private space to snuggle up close at the end of the night."[82]
Similarly the costs to society of car use may include; maintaining roads, land use, air pollution, noise pollution, road congestion, public health, health care, and of disposing of the vehicle at the end of its life; and can be balanced against the value of the benefits to society that car use generates. Societal benefits may include: economy benefits, such as job and wealth creation, of car production and maintenance, transportation provision, society wellbeing derived from leisure and travel opportunities, and revenue generation from the tax opportunities. The ability of humans to move flexibly from place to place has far-reaching implications for the nature of societies.[17]
Environmental effects
[edit]

Car production and use has a large number of environmental impacts: it causes local air pollution plastic pollution and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.[85] Cars and vans caused 10% of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in 2022.[86] As of 2023[update], electric cars produce about half the emissions over their lifetime as diesel and petrol cars. This is set to improve as countries produce more of their electricity from low-carbon sources.[87] Cars consume almost a quarter of world oil production as of 2019.[53] Cities planned around cars are often less dense, which leads to further emissions, as they are less walkable for instance.[85] A growing demand for large SUVs is driving up emissions from cars.[88]
Cars are a major cause of air pollution,[89] which stems from exhaust gas in diesel and petrol cars and from dust from brakes, tyres, and road wear. Larger cars pollute more.[90] Heavy metals and microplastics (from tyres) are also released into the environment, during production, use and at the end of life. Mining related to car manufacturing and oil spills both cause water pollution.[85]
Animals and plants are often negatively affected by cars via habitat destruction and fragmentation from the road network and pollution. Animals are also killed every year on roads by cars, referred to as roadkill.[85] More recent road developments are including significant environmental mitigation in their designs, such as green bridges (designed to allow wildlife crossings) and creating wildlife corridors.
Governments use fiscal policies, such as road tax, to discourage the purchase and use of more polluting cars;[91] Vehicle emission standards ban the sale of new highly pollution cars.[92] Many countries plan to stop selling fossil cars altogether between 2025 and 2050.[93] Various cities have implemented low-emission zones, banning old fossil fuel and Amsterdam is planning to ban fossil fuel cars completely.[94][95] Some cities make it easier for people to choose other forms of transport, such as cycling.[94] Many Chinese cities limit licensing of fossil fuel cars.[96]
Social issues
[edit]Mass production of personal motor vehicles in the United States and other developed countries with extensive territories such as Australia, Argentina, and France vastly increased individual and group mobility and greatly increased and expanded economic development in urban, suburban, exurban and rural areas.[citation needed] Growth in the popularity of cars and commuting has led to traffic congestion.[97] Moscow, Istanbul, Bogotá, Mexico City and São Paulo were the world's most congested cities in 2018 according to INRIX, a data analytics company.[98]
Access to cars
[edit]In the United States, the transport divide and car dependency resulting from domination of car-based transport systems presents barriers to employment in low-income neighbourhoods,[99] with many low-income individuals and families forced to run cars they cannot afford in order to maintain their income.[100] Dependency on automobiles by African Americans may result in exposure to the hazards of driving while black and other types of racial discrimination related to buying, financing and insuring them.[101]
Health impact
[edit]Air pollution from cars increases the risk of lung cancer and heart disease. It can also harm pregnancies: more children are born too early or with lower birth weight.[85] Children are extra vulnerable to air pollution, as their bodies are still developing and air pollution in children is linked to the development of asthma, childhood cancer, and neurocognitive issues such as autism.[102][85] The growth in popularity of the car allowed cities to sprawl, therefore encouraging more travel by car, resulting in inactivity and obesity, which in turn can lead to increased risk of a variety of diseases.[103] When places are designed around cars, children have fewer opportunities to go places by themselves, and lose opportunities to become more independent.[104][85]
Emerging car technologies
[edit]Intensive development of conventional battery electric vehicles is continuing into the 2020s,[105] for example lithium iron phosphate batteries are safer and cheaper.[106] Sensors such as lidar are more used.[107] Other car technologies that are under development include wireless charging.[108] Software is increasing and may have many new uses, for example automatically not hitting pedestrians.[109]
New materials which may replace steel car bodies include aluminium,[110] fiberglass, carbon fiber, biocomposites, and carbon nanotubes.[111] Telematics technology is allowing more and more people to share cars, on a pay-as-you-go basis, through car share and carpool schemes. Communication is also evolving due to connected car systems.[112] Open-source cars are not widespread.[113] Microwave weapons which can disable cars are being tested.[114]
Autonomous car
[edit]
Fully autonomous vehicles, also known as driverless cars, already exist as robotaxis[115][116] but have a long way to go before they are in general use.[117]
Car sharing
[edit]Car-share arrangements and carpooling are also increasingly popular, in the US and Europe.[118] Services like car sharing offer residents to "share" a vehicle rather than own a car in already congested neighbourhoods.[119]
Industry
[edit]The automotive industry designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and sells the world's motor vehicles, more than three-quarters of which are cars. In 2020, there were 56 million cars manufactured worldwide,[120] down from 67 million the previous year.[121] The automotive industry in China produces by far the most (20 million in 2020), followed by Japan (seven million), then Germany, South Korea and India.[122] The largest market is China, followed by the US.
Around the world, there are about a billion cars on the road;[123][failed verification] they burn over a trillion litres (0.26×1012 US gal; 0.22×1012 imp gal) of petrol and diesel fuel yearly, consuming about 50 exajoules (14,000 TWh) of energy.[124] The numbers of cars are increasing rapidly in China and India.[125] In the opinion of some, urban transport systems based around the car have proved unsustainable, consuming excessive energy, affecting the health of populations, and delivering a declining level of service despite increasing investment. Many of these negative effects fall disproportionately on those social groups who are also least likely to own and drive cars.[126][127] The sustainable transport movement focuses on solutions to these problems. The car industry is also facing increasing competition from the public transport sector, as some people re-evaluate their private vehicle usage. In July 2021, the European Commission introduced the "Fit for 55" legislation package, outlining crucial directives for the automotive sector's future.[128][129] According to this package, by 2035, all newly sold cars in the European market must be Zero-emissions vehicles.[130][131][132]
Alternatives
[edit]
Established alternatives for some aspects of car use include public transport such as busses, trolleybusses, trains, subways, tramways, light rail, cycling, and walking. Bicycle sharing systems have been established in China and many European cities, including Copenhagen and Amsterdam. Similar programmes have been developed in large US cities.[133][134] Additional individual modes of transport, such as personal rapid transit could serve as an alternative to cars if they prove to be socially accepted.[135] A study which checked the costs and the benefits of introducing Low Traffic Neighbourhood in London found the benefits overpass the costs approximately by 100 times in the first 20 years and the difference is growing over time.[136]
Car Motorsport
[edit]As well as used for typical driving, motorsport (excluding other types of motorsport) is a type of sport, involving High Speed Racing, drifting It includes various other racing series such as Formula One, NASCAR, and MotoGP.[137][138][139][140][141]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Auxiliary power outlets may be supplied continuously or only when the ignition is active depending on electrical wiring.
References
[edit]- ^ Fowler, H.W.; Fowler, F.G., eds. (1976). Pocket Oxford Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198611134.
- ^ a b "motor car, n." OED Online. Oxford University Press. September 2014. Archived from the original on 8 December 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2014.
- ^ admin (24 June 2021). "How Many Cars Are There In The World [2025]?". Hedges & Company. Retrieved 13 September 2025.
- ^ "Some milestones of the auto age". The New York Times. 26 January 1986. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
- ^ Birch, Ryan (14 June 2024). "Best American cars of all time - Oldsmobile Curved Dash". Auto Express. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
- ^ "1926 Ford Model T Sports Touring Car". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
- ^ "Model T ‑ Ford, Car & Invented". History. 13 March 2024. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
- ^ Hoekstra, Kyle (25 April 2022). "Ford Model T: The Invention of the World's First Affordable Car". History Hit. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
- ^ "The Motor Vehicle, 1917". Scientific American. January 2017. Archived from the original on 26 October 2022. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
- ^ "Automobile History". www.history.com. 21 August 2018. Archived from the original on 27 November 2018. Retrieved 29 August 2021.
- ^ "Automobile Industry Introduction". Plunkett Research. Archived from the original on 22 July 2011.
- ^ Smith, Matthew Nitch (22 April 2016). "The number of cars worldwide is set to double by 2040". World Economic Forum.
- ^ "Factcheck: How electric vehicles help to tackle climate change". Carbon Brief. 13 May 2019. Archived from the original on 25 August 2021. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
- ^ a b "Car Operating Costs". RACV. Archived from the original on 7 October 2009. Retrieved 22 December 2009.
- ^ a b Peden, Margie; Scurfield, Richard; Sleet, David; Mohan, Dinesh; Hyder, Adnan A.; Jarawan, Eva; Mathers, Colin, eds. (2004). World report on road traffic injury prevention. World Health Organization. ISBN 92-4-156260-9. Archived from the original on 4 May 2008. Retrieved 24 June 2008.
- ^ a b c Setright, L. J. K. (2004). Drive On!: A Social History of the Motor Car. Granta Books. ISBN 1-86207-698-7.
- ^ a b Jakle, John A.; Sculle, Keith A. (2004). Lots of Parking: Land Use in a Car Culture. University of Virginia Press. ISBN 0-8139-2266-6.
- ^ "Car". (etymology). Online Etymology Dictionary. Archived from the original on 6 March 2008. Retrieved 2 June 2008.
- ^ "Wayne State University and The Detroit Public Library Present "Changing Face of the Auto Industry"". Wayne State University. 28 June 2003. Archived from the original on 28 June 2003.
- ^ "car, n.1". OED Online. Oxford University Press. September 2014. Archived from the original on 8 December 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2014.
- ^ "A dictionary of the Welsh language" (PDF). University of Wales. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 15 June 2016.
- ^ "auto-, comb. form2". OED Online. Oxford University Press. September 2014. Archived from the original on 8 December 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2014.
- ^ "Definition of horseless carriage". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 13 June 2015. Retrieved 23 November 2015.
- ^ "Prospective Arrangements". The Times. 4 December 1897. p. 13.
- ^ "automobile, adj. and n." OED Online. Oxford University Press. September 2014. Archived from the original on 8 December 2014. Retrieved 29 September 2014.
- ^ "Definition of "auto"". Cambridge Dictionary. Archived from the original on 15 September 2015. Retrieved 19 August 2015.
- ^ "Definition of auto". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 23 November 2015.
- ^ Dimitris (16 July 2016). "Dimitris' Diary: Stuttgart, cradle of the automobile and the imperial family". Go Easy Berlin. Germany. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
- ^ "USAG Stuttgart". Military One Source. US. 17 August 2023. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
- ^ Barker, Theo (1987). The Economic and Social Effects of the Spread of Motor Vehicles: An International Centenary Tribute (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. p. 55. ISBN 978-1349086269.
- ^ "A broadside on a clockwork carriage built by Hans Hautsch". British Museum. Retrieved 28 May 2024.
- ^ "1679-1681–R P Verbiest's Steam Chariot". History of the Automobile: origin to 1900. Hergé. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
- ^ a b "A brief note on Ferdinand Verbiest". Curious Expeditions. 2 July 2007. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013. Retrieved 18 April 2008. – The vehicle pictured is the 20th century diecast model made by Brumm, of a later vehicle, not a model based on Verbiest's plans.
- ^ a b c "Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 29 April 2015. Retrieved 2 June 2022.
- ^ a b speos.fr. "Niepce Museum, Other Inventions". Niepce.house.museum. Archived from the original on 20 December 2005. Retrieved 26 August 2010.
- ^ Lazarnick, Nick (30 July 1907). "Henry Ford posing in Ford-Lenoir automobile". detroit public library. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 20 February 2023.
- ^ a b c Stein, Ralph (1967). The Automobile Book. Paul Hamlyn.
- ^ Wakefield, Ernest H. (1994). History of the Electric Automobile. Society of Automotive Engineers. pp. 2–3. ISBN 1-56091-299-5.
- ^ "1885–1886. The first automobile". Daimler. Archived from the original on 21 October 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
- ^ Garrison, Ervan G. (2018). History of Engineering and Technology: Artful Methods. Routledge. p. 272. ISBN 978-1351440486.
- ^ "Bertha Benz Hits the Road, 125 Years Ago – History in the Headlines". History.com. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 13 October 2015.
- ^ "The First Car – A History of the Automobile". Ausbcomp.com. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
- ^ "The Duryea Brothers – Automobile History". Inventors.about.com. 16 September 2010. Archived from the original on 10 July 2012. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
- ^ Longstreet, Stephen. A Century on Wheels: The Story of Studebaker. New York: Henry Holt. p. 121. 1st edn., 1952.
- ^ Clymer, Floyd (1950). Treasury of Early American Automobiles, 1877–1925. New York: Bonanza Books. p. 178.
- ^ Burgess Wise, D. (1970). Veteran and Vintage Cars. London: Hamlyn. ISBN 0-600-00283-7.
- ^ a b c Georgano, N. (2000). Beaulieu Encyclopedia of the Automobile. London: HMSO. ISBN 1-57958-293-1.
- ^ Jerina, Nataša G. (May 2014). "Turin Charter ratified by FIVA". TICCIH. Archived from the original on 11 March 2018. Retrieved 11 March 2018.
- ^ "Industrialization of American Society". Engr.sjsu.edu. Archived from the original on 19 September 2010. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f g Georgano, G. N. (2000). Vintage Cars 1886 to 1930. Sweden: AB Nordbok. ISBN 1-85501-926-4.
- ^ Hendrickson, Kenneth E., ed. (2014). The encyclopedia of the industrial revolution in world history. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 978-0-8108-8888-3. OCLC 913956423.
- ^ "Are Electric Vehicles Safe?". www.recurrentauto.com. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
EVs are mostly all built like a skateboard, with the battery pack on the bottom of the car. This gives them amazing cornering and handling, and makes them very hard to flip.
- ^ a b "October: Growing preference for SUVs challenges emissions reductions in passenger car mark". IEA. Archived from the original on 18 October 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
- ^ "Bloomberg NEF Electric Vehicle Outlook 2019". Bloomberg NEF. 15 May 2019. Archived from the original on 3 June 2019. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
- ^ "Govt to completely lift fuel subsidies in 2020: minister". Egypt Independent. 8 January 2019. Archived from the original on 2 February 2019. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
- ^ "Why the Rouhani administration must eliminate energy subsidies". Al-Monitor. 9 December 2018.
- ^ "Global Electric Vehicle Sales Set for Record-Breaking Year, Even as US Market Slows Sharply, BloombergNEF Finds". BloombergNEF. 18 June 2025. Retrieved 21 June 2025.
- ^ "Share of cars currently in use that are electric". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 27 April 2025. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- ^ Cline, Amanda (25 December 2021). "What Is a Mild Hybrid Vehicle?". MotorBiscuit. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
- ^ "Why Drum Brakes Works on EVs". Benevelli. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
- ^ "Regenerative Braking: Benefits and Limitations". The Brake Report. 31 May 2022. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
- ^ "VW Golf: Innenleuchten" (in German). Archived from the original on 25 October 2021. Retrieved 26 October 2021.
- ^ "[…] Kühlboxen im Test […]". auto motor und sport (in German). 24 May 2017. Archived from the original on 26 October 2021. Retrieved 26 October 2021.
- ^ "Alle Infos von der neuen Mercedes S-Klasse 2013 (W222)". auto.oe24.at (in German). 16 May 2013. Archived from the original on 26 October 2021. Retrieved 26 October 2021.
- ^ "Mercedes-Benz S-Klasse 2013: Alle Details und Fotos des neuen Alphatiers". Speed Heads (in German). 2013. Archived from the original on 26 October 2021. Retrieved 26 October 2021.
- ^ "Used 2008 Chevrolet Suburban Features & Specs". Edmunds. Archived from the original on 25 November 2015. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
- ^ "How much do electric cars weigh?". EV Archive. Archived from the original on 16 July 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
- ^ a b Lowrey, Annie (27 June 2011). "Your Big Car Is Killing Me". Slate. Archived from the original on 25 November 2015. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
- ^ Sellén, Magnus (2 August 2019). "How much does a Car Weigh? – [Weight List by Car Model & Type]". Mechanic Base. Archived from the original on 22 December 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
- ^ Niranjan, Ajit (22 January 2024). "SUVs drive trend for new cars to grow 1cm wider in UK and EU every two years, says report". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
- ^ Niranjan, Ajit (22 January 2024). "SUVs drive trend for new cars to grow 1cm wider in UK and EU every two years, says report". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
France has …. penalties that cover the weight of a car.
- ^ Shaffer, Blake; Auffhammer, Maximilian; Samaras, Constantine (October 2021). "Make electric vehicles lighter to maximize climate and safety benefits". Nature. 598 (7880): 254–256. Bibcode:2021Natur.598..254S. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02760-8. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 34642477. S2CID 238747321. Archived from the original on 14 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ^ "How big a battery should you insist on for your electric car?". thestar.com. 9 April 2022. Archived from the original on 2 October 2022. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
- ^ "Mary Ward 1827–1869". Universityscience.ie. Archived from the original on 11 March 2008. Retrieved 27 October 2008.
- ^ "Bliss plaque". CityStreets. Archived from the original on 26 August 2006.
- ^ "SaferCar.gov". NHTSA. Archived from the original on 27 July 2004.
- ^ "IIHS-HLDI". IIHS-HLDI crash testing and highway safety. Archived from the original on 23 January 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2022.
- ^ "Americans' love affair with big cars is killing them". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 21 September 2024.
- ^ "New rules to improve road safety and enable fully driverless vehicles in the EU". European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved 21 June 2025.
- ^ Fran Tonkiss (2005). Space, the city and social theory: social relations and urban forms. Polity.
- ^ "Ford's Affordable EV Charger Will Let an F-150 Power Your Home". Review Geek. March 2022. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
- ^ Anthony, Ariana (9 May 2013). "Dating in the 1920s: Lipstick, Booze and the Origins of Slut-Shaming | HowAboutWe". The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 20 November 2015. Retrieved 23 November 2015.
- ^ "Highlights of the Automotive Trends Report". EPA.gov. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 12 December 2022. Archived from the original on 2 September 2023.
- ^ Cazzola, Pierpaolo; Paoli, Leonardo; Teter, Jacob (November 2023). "Trends in the Global Vehicle Fleet 2023 / Managing the SUV Shift and the EV Transition" (PDF). Global Fuel Economy Initiative (GFEI). p. 3. doi:10.7922/G2HM56SV. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 November 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g Miner, Patrick; Smith, Barbara M.; Jani, Anant; McNeill, Geraldine; Gathorne-Hardy, Alfred (1 February 2024). "Car harm: A global review of automobility's harm to people and the environment". Journal of Transport Geography. 115 103817. Bibcode:2024JTGeo.11503817M. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103817. ISSN 0966-6923.
- ^ "Cars and Vans – Analysis". IEA. Retrieved 3 December 2024.
- ^ "Outlook for emissions reductions – Global EV Outlook 2024 – Analysis". IEA. Retrieved 3 December 2024.
- ^ "SUVs are setting new sales records each year – and so are their emissions – Analysis". IEA. 28 May 2024. Retrieved 3 December 2024.
- ^ Sengupta, Somini; Popovich, Nadja (14 November 2019). "Cities Worldwide Are Reimagining Their Relationship With Cars". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 4 December 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
- ^ "Electric vehicles also cause air pollution". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 25 May 2025.
- ^ "A Review and Comparative Analysis of Fiscal Policies Associated with New Passenger Vehicle CO2 Emissions" (PDF). International Council on Clean Transportation. February 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2013.
- ^ "Tough Euro 7 pollution rules planned for adoption this month". Automotive News Europe. 10 October 2022. Archived from the original on 24 October 2022. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
- ^ Carroll, Sean Goulding (5 July 2022). "A seismic shift: Support for ICE melts as Europe warms to EVs". www.euractiv.com. Archived from the original on 7 July 2022. Retrieved 7 July 2022.
- ^ a b Sherwood, Harriet (26 January 2020). "Brighton, Bristol, York ... city centres signal the end of the road for cars". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Archived from the original on 26 January 2020. Retrieved 26 January 2020.
- ^ Boffey, Daniel (3 May 2019). "Amsterdam to ban petrol and diesel cars and motorbikes by 2030". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 7 September 2020. Retrieved 18 May 2019.
- ^ Lambert, Fred (6 June 2019). "China boosts electric car sales by removing license plate quotas". Electrek. Archived from the original on 8 November 2019. Retrieved 11 June 2019.
- ^ "Planning and the Complicated Causes and Effects of Congestion". www.planetizen.com. Archived from the original on 24 October 2022. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
- ^ Newman, Katelyn (12 February 2019). "Cities With the World's Worst Traffic Congestion". US News. Archived from the original on 18 March 2019. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- ^ "Tackling transport-related barriers to employment in low-income neighbourhoods". JRF. 6 August 2018. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 13 April 2021.
- ^ Mattioli, Giulio (28 December 2017). "'Forced Car Ownership' in the UK and Germany: Socio-Spatial Patterns and Potential Economic Stress Impacts". Social Inclusion. 5 (4): 147–160. doi:10.17645/si.v5i4.1081.
- ^ Andrew Ross; Julie Livingston (15 December 2022). "Once You See the Truth About Cars, You Can't Unsee It". The New York Times. No. New York Times. Archived from the original on 15 December 2022. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
Andrew Ross and Julie Livingston are New York University professors, members of NYU's Prison Education Program Research Lab and authors of the book "Cars and Jails: Freedom Dreams, Debt, and Carcerality."
- ^ Brumberg, Heather L.; Karr, Catherine J.; Bole, Aparna; Ahdoot, Samantha; Balk, Sophie J.; Bernstein, Aaron S.; Byron, Lori G.; Landrigan, Philip J.; Marcus, Steven M.; Nerlinger, Abby L.; Pacheco, Susan E.; Woolf, Alan D.; Zajac, Lauren; Baum, Carl R.; Campbell, Carla C. (1 June 2021). "Ambient Air Pollution: Health Hazards to Children". Pediatrics. 147 (6): e2021051484. doi:10.1542/peds.2021-051484. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 34001642.
- ^ "Our Ailing Communities". Metropolis Magazine. Archived from the original on 8 February 2007.
- ^ Weir, Holly (1 January 2023). "Children's autonomous mobility and their well-being". Wellbeing, Space and Society. 4 100134. doi:10.1016/j.wss.2023.100134. ISSN 2666-5581.
- ^ "EV battery research projects get £55m funding boost". Air Quality News. 5 September 2019. Archived from the original on 5 September 2019. Retrieved 5 September 2019.
- ^ "New EV batteries are making electric cars cheaper and safer". The Washington Post. 19 February 2025. Archived from the original on 7 April 2025. Retrieved 21 June 2025.
- ^ Redondo, Mónica (11 February 2022). "LiDar sensors: how their use in the automotive industry is growing". Driving ECO. Retrieved 21 June 2025.
- ^ "Wireless electric car charging gets cash boost". 9 July 2019. Archived from the original on 9 December 2019. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
- ^ "Driving the future: 10 automotive industry trends and predictions". Archived from the original on 23 January 2025. Retrieved 21 June 2025.
- ^ "Survey reveals aluminum remains fastest growing automotive material". Automotive World. 12 August 2020. Archived from the original on 21 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ^ Vyas, Kashyap (3 October 2018). "This New Material Can Transform the Car Manufacturing Industry". Interesting Engineering. Turkey. Archived from the original on 16 September 2019. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- ^ "Inside Uniti's plan to build the iPhone of EVs". GreenMotor.co.uk. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ "Geek My Ride presentation at linux.conf.au 2009". Archived from the original on 11 April 2011. Retrieved 11 July 2010.
- ^ "This giant microwave may change the future of war". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 21 June 2025.
- ^ "China's Xpeng passes autonomous driving test in race to launch robotaxis". South China Morning Post. 25 October 2022. Archived from the original on 24 October 2022. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
- ^ "8 Ways Waymo's Autonomous Taxi Surprised Us on a Ride". Consumer Reports. 4 October 2022. Archived from the original on 24 October 2022. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
- ^ Mims, Christopher (5 June 2021). "Self-Driving Cars Could Be Decades Away, No Matter What Elon Musk Said". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 2 September 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2021.
- ^ "Global Automotive Consumer Study – exploring consumer preferences and mobility choices in Europe" (PDF). Deloitte. 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 July 2015. Retrieved 23 November 2015.
- ^ "Flexcar Expands to Philadelphia". Green Car Congress. 2 April 2007. Archived from the original on 9 July 2007. Retrieved 12 April 2007.
- ^ "2020 Statistics". OICA. Archived from the original on 2 April 2022. Retrieved 2 September 2021.
- ^ "2019 Statistics". OICA. Archived from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2021.
- ^ "2018 Statistics". OICA. Archived from the original on 19 September 2021. Retrieved 24 September 2021.
- ^ "PC World Vehicles in Use" (PDF). OICA. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 September 2021. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- ^ "Global Transportation Energy Consumption: Examination of Scenarios to 2040 using ITEDD" (PDF). Energy Information Administration. September 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 May 2019. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- ^ "Automobile Industry Introduction". Plunkett Research. Archived from the original on 22 July 2011.
- ^ "Transport and health". World Health Organisation, Europe. Archived from the original on 29 May 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2008.
- ^ "Global Action for Healthy Streets: Annual Report 2018" (PDF). FiA Foundation. Retrieved 16 March 2019.[permanent dead link]
- ^ "EU ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars from 2035 explained". Topics | European Parliament. 11 March 2022. Retrieved 17 December 2024.
- ^ "European Green Deal: Commission proposes transformation of EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions". European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved 17 December 2024.
- ^ "New cars sold in EU must be zero-emission from 2035". 28 March 2023. Retrieved 17 December 2024.
- ^ "Thảm lót sàn ô tô" (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 17 December 2024.
- ^ philcurry (14 July 2021). "Fit for 55: EU introduces ban on petrol and diesel cars by 2035". Autovista24. Retrieved 17 December 2024.
- ^ "About Bike Share Programs". Tech Bikes MIT. Archived from the original on 20 December 2007. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
- ^ Cambell, Charlie (2 April 2018). "The Trouble with Sharing: China's Bike Fever Has Reached Saturation Point". Time. Archived from the original on 7 June 2019. Retrieved 18 August 2019.
- ^ Kay, Jane Holtz (1998). Asphalt Nation: how the automobile took over America, and how we can take it back. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-21620-2.
- ^ Walker, Peter (8 March 2024). "Health gains of low-traffic schemes up to 100 times greater than costs, study finds". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 March 2024.
- ^ "Everything you need to know about F1". www.formula1.com. Retrieved 21 September 2025.
- ^ "Behind the Wheel: Understanding NASCAR Racing for New Fans". www.sonomaraceway.com. Retrieved 21 September 2025.
- ^ "Drifting". Motorsport UK. Retrieved 21 September 2025.
- ^ Insurance, Quote Sports. "Types of Motorsport Explained - Quote Sports Insurance". www.quotesportsinsurance.co.uk. Retrieved 21 September 2025.
- ^ "Motorsport Explained: MotoGP". parc femme. 4 February 2025. Retrieved 21 September 2025.
Further reading
[edit]- Berger, Michael L. (2001). The automobile in American history and culture: a reference guide. US: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 9780313016066.
- Brinkley, Douglas (2003). Wheels for the world: Henry Ford, his company, and a century of progress, 1903-2003. Viking. ISBN 9780670031818.
- Cole, John; Cole, Francis (213). A Geography of the European Union. London: Routledge. p. 110. ISBN 9781317835585.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) – Number of cars in use (in millions) in various European countries in 1973 and 1992 - Halberstam, David (1986). The Reckoning. New York: Morrow. ISBN 0-688-04838-2.
- Kay, Jane Holtz (1997). Asphalt nation : how the automobile took over America, and how we can take it back. New York: Crown. ISBN 0-517-58702-5.
- Margolius, Ivan (2020). "What is an automobile?". The Automobile. 37 (11): 48–52. ISSN 0955-1328.
- Sachs, Wolfgang (1992). For love of the automobile: looking back into the history of our desires. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-06878-5.
- Wilkins, Mira; Hill, Frank Ernest (1964). American Business Abroad: Ford on Six Continents.
- Williams, Heathcote (1991). Autogeddon. New York: Arcade. ISBN 1-55970-176-5.
- Latin America: Economic Growth Trends. US: Agency for International Development, Office of Statistics and Reports. 1972. p. 11. – Number of motor vehicles registered in Latin America in 1970
- World Motor Vehicle Production and Registration. US: Business and Defense Services Administration, Transportation Equipment Division. p. 3. – Number of registered passenger cars in various countries in 1959-60 and 1969–70
External links
[edit]
Media related to Automobiles at Wikimedia Commons- Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile
- Forum for the Automobile and Society
- Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1996: Transportation and the Environment by Fletcher, Wendell; Sedor, Joanne; p. 219 (contains figures on vehicle registrations in various countries in 1970 and 1992)
Etymology
Origins and linguistic evolution
The English word "car" traces its origins to the Latin carrus or carrum, terms denoting a two-wheeled wagon or cart, borrowed from the Gaulish karros, a Celtic word referring to a wheeled vehicle, likely a war chariot, attested in ancient sources from around the 1st century BCE.[9] This Proto-Celtic root, possibly linked to Indo-European *kers- ("to run"), entered Vulgar Latin by the early medieval period, spreading through Roman trade and military use across Europe.[9] Cognates appear in other Celtic languages, such as Irish carr (cart) and Welsh car (vehicle), underscoring the term's pre-Roman, indigenous European foundation for wheeled transport.[10] From Latin, carrus evolved into Old French carre or char by the 11th century, denoting carts or chariots in feudal contexts, and entered Middle English around 1300 via Anglo-Norman influence following the Norman Conquest of 1066.[9] In early English usage, "car" primarily signified animal-drawn wheeled conveyances, as in 14th-century texts describing battle chariots or railway cars by the 19th century, distinct from but related to "carriage," which derived separately from Old French charrie (act of carting).[9] The term's application broadened gradually, but it was not a truncation of "carriage"; both words independently stem from the carrus family, with "car" retaining a more direct link to the original two-wheeled form.[11] Linguistic adaptation to self-propelled vehicles occurred in the 1890s amid the automobile's invention; British patents and publications first paired "motor" with "car" in 1896, as in "motor-car" for steam or petrol-powered road vehicles, reflecting continuity with horse-drawn precedents.[9] By 1897, "car" alone denoted the passenger automobile in English, particularly in American usage, where it displaced "automobile" (coined in French automobile around 1865 from Greek autos "self" and Latin mobilis "movable") for colloquial reference by the early 20th century.[12] This shift was driven by mass production, such as Ford's Model T from 1908, embedding "car" in global lexicon, while European variants like Spanish coche (from coach) or German Auto (short for Automobil) diverged, though English "car" influenced international terminology through exports.[11] In British English, "motor car" persisted longer formally but yielded to "car" by mid-century, illustrating semantic specialization from general wagon to modern passenger vehicle.[9]History
Invention and pioneering designs (1769–1900)
The invention of self-propelled road vehicles began with steam power in the late 18th century. In 1769, French military engineer Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot constructed the fardier à vapeur, a three-wheeled steam-powered tractor designed to haul artillery. This vehicle, weighing approximately 4,000 kg, achieved speeds of about 2.25 mph (3.6 km/h) for up to 20 minutes before requiring refueling with water and wood.[13][14] Cugnot's design featured a front-mounted boiler and piston engine driving the single front wheel, but it suffered from poor stability, crashing into a stone wall during trials, which halted further development amid funding cuts. Throughout the early 19th century, steam road vehicles proliferated in Europe, though regulatory restrictions like the UK's Red Flag Act of 1865 limited speeds to 4 mph and required a flag-waving attendant. British inventors such as Walter Hancock operated steam omnibuses in London from 1829, carrying passengers commercially, while Richard Trevithick demonstrated a high-pressure steam carriage in 1801 capable of hill-climbing.[15] These designs relied on boilers for propulsion but faced challenges including long startup times, explosion risks from low-pressure systems, and heavy water needs, confining them to short-distance or niche applications.[16] Parallel advancements in electric propulsion emerged by mid-century, with practical demonstrations in the 1880s. In 1881, French inventor Gustave Trouvé tested a battery-powered tricycle on Paris streets, marking an early human-carrying electric vehicle.[17] English inventor Thomas Parker produced the first electric cars for sale in 1884, using rechargeable lead-acid batteries, while American William Morrison built a six-passenger electric wagon in 1891 with a top speed of 14 mph (22 km/h).[18][19] Electric vehicles offered instant torque and quiet operation without emissions at the point of use, but limited battery range—often under 50 miles—and high costs restricted them to urban elites until the 1890s.[20] The breakthrough toward modern automobiles came with internal combustion engines in the 1880s. German engineers Karl Benz, Gottlieb Daimler, and Wilhelm Maybach independently developed gasoline-powered vehicles. Benz completed the Patent-Motorwagen in 1885, a three-wheeled chassis with a rear-mounted 0.75 hp (0.55 kW) single-cylinder four-stroke engine producing 954 cc displacement, achieving 10 mph (16 km/h) top speed.[4][21] Patented on January 29, 1886, as the first automobile, it featured innovations like electric ignition, differential steering via tiller, and wire-spoke wheels, though early models lacked reverse gear and required hand-cranking.[22] In 1888, Benz's wife Bertha undertook the first long-distance drive, covering 66 miles (106 km) from Mannheim to Pforzheim, publicizing the vehicle's reliability and prompting improvements like a fuel line redesign using ligroin.[4] Daimler and Maybach mounted a high-speed engine on a wooden bicycle frame in 1885, creating a motorized velocipede, and by 1886 fitted a four-wheeled carriage with a 1.1 hp V-twin engine.[14] These efforts spurred commercialization; by 1890, French firms like Panhard et Levassor adopted the "systeme Panhard" with front-engined, rear-wheel-drive layouts, influencing Peugeot's production of over 500 units by 1899.[13] Steam, electric, and gasoline designs coexisted into the 1900s, with steam comprising 40% of U.S. production in 1900, but internal combustion's higher energy density and refueling convenience positioned it for dominance.[23]Mass production and consumer adoption (1900–1945)
The introduction of semi-stationary assembly lines by Ransom E. Olds in 1901 marked the onset of automobile mass production, with the Curved Dash Oldsmobile achieving 425 units that year and scaling to 5,000 annually by 1904, making it the first high-volume American car at a price of $650.[24] This approach emphasized standardized parts and sequential assembly, reducing costs and enabling output that outpaced competitors reliant on craft methods.[25] By 1903, Olds Motor Works had become the largest U.S. automaker, producing over 4,000 vehicles, though a factory fire that year temporarily disrupted operations.[26] Henry Ford advanced these techniques with the Model T, launched on October 1, 1908, at $850, incorporating durable design for rural roads and vanadium steel for strength.[27] The 1913 implementation of a moving assembly line at Highland Park slashed production time for a Model T chassis from 12.5 hours to 93 minutes, enabling 202,667 units in 1914 and facilitating price drops to $290 by 1924 through economies of scale.[28] Cumulative production exceeded 15 million by May 1927, when civilian output ceased, dominating U.S. sales—over 40% by 1917—and spurring industry-wide adoption of flow production, which increased worker efficiency but intensified labor demands.[29][30] U.S. passenger car registrations grew from approximately 8,000 in 1900 to 458,000 by 1910, reflecting affordability gains and rural demand, then surged to 9.2 million by 1920 amid installment financing and road improvements.[31] Ownership peaked at 26 million in 1941 before wartime rationing halted civilian production from 1942 to 1945, redirecting factories to military vehicles like jeeps and tanks.[32] In Europe, mass production lagged; British output rose from 73,000 vehicles in 1922 to 239,000 by 1929, while Citroën's Type C in France achieved 30,000 units annually by the mid-1920s through similar assembly innovations, though artisanal methods persisted longer due to smaller markets and higher labor costs.[33] This era's innovations democratized mobility, with cars comprising 7.5 million registered vehicles (cars and trucks) by 1920, fostering suburban growth and commerce but straining infrastructure until federal highway acts in the 1920s.[31] Economic downturns like the Great Depression reduced registrations temporarily, yet recovery by the late 1930s underscored the automobile's entrenched role in consumer culture.[34]Postwar expansion and standardization (1946–1970s)
Following World War II, the United States automobile industry rapidly reconverted from military production to civilian output, releasing 1946 models amid pent-up consumer demand fueled by wartime savings and economic expansion. U.S. motor vehicle production, which had halted civilian output in 1942, resumed swiftly, with manufacturers like General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler producing over 2 million vehicles by 1947, rising to approximately 8 million annually by the mid-1950s. This surge aligned with suburbanization and infrastructure development, including the 1956 Federal-Aid Highway Act establishing the Interstate System, which facilitated greater car dependency; by 1950, the U.S. hosted about 40 million registered vehicles, representing over 80% of global car production excluding commercial vehicles.[35][36][37] In Europe, reconstruction under the Marshall Plan enabled automotive recovery, with production shifting from prewar artisanal methods to mass output; for instance, Volkswagen's Beetle achieved over 15 million units by the 1970s through simplified, efficient assembly, while Fiat and Renault scaled similarly. Global motor vehicle production grew from around 8 million units in 1950 to over 23 million by 1970, diversifying beyond U.S. dominance as Japan emerged via economic policies promoting exports—Toyota's Corolla, introduced in 1966, exemplified compact, reliable designs targeting international markets. Car ownership in Western Europe expanded from a low base of under 50 vehicles per 1,000 people in 1950 to over 200 by 1970, driven by rising incomes and standardized urban planning, though lagging U.S. levels where saturation neared 400 per 1,000.[38][39][40] Standardization advanced through technological convergence and manufacturing efficiencies honed during wartime. Unibody construction, integrating frame and body for lighter weight and cost savings, became prevalent in models like the 1949 Nash and European compacts, displacing separate body-on-frame designs in many segments by the 1960s. Automatic transmissions, pioneered prewar but mass-produced post-1948 via GM's Hydra-Matic (offered in over 200,000 Oldsmobiles that year), proliferated as options in U.S. vehicles, reaching 80% adoption by the late 1960s, while hydraulic power steering and overhead-valve engines standardized for smoother operation and power. These shifts, alongside annual model cycles and modular assembly lines, reduced production variability and enabled economies of scale, though they entrenched planned obsolescence via stylistic updates like tailfins in 1950s U.S. designs.[41][42][36] By the 1970s, early regulatory standardization emerged, including U.S. mandates for seat belts in 1968 and initial emissions controls under the 1970 Clean Air Act, prompting uniform engineering adaptations across manufacturers. Japan's keiretsu-integrated supply chains further standardized quality via just-in-time methods precursors, challenging U.S. dominance as imports rose from negligible to 15% of American sales by 1970. This era's expansion, however, sowed seeds of overreliance on large, fuel-inefficient vehicles, setting the stage for the 1973 oil crisis.[38][43][44] ![1966 Toyota Corolla exemplifying Japanese postwar compact production][float-right]Efficiency drives and globalization (1980s–2010s)
![Geely assembly line in China][float-right] In response to the 1979 oil crisis and tightening regulations, the U.S. implemented Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in 1975, which doubled the average new passenger vehicle fuel economy from 13.5 miles per gallon (mpg) in 1975 to 27.5 mpg by 1985.[45][46] Japanese automakers, emphasizing compact, efficient designs, captured significant U.S. market share during the early 1980s, with imports rising to over 20% of sales by 1980, prompting voluntary export restraints in 1981 that limited shipments to 1.68 million units annually.[47][48] This competition drove U.S. manufacturers to adopt lean production techniques and improve engine efficiency, though overall fleet efficiency stagnated in the late 1980s and declined through the mid-2000s due to the popularity of heavier light trucks and SUVs, which benefited from lighter CAFE requirements classified as trucks rather than cars.[49][50] Globalization accelerated as Japanese firms established U.S. production facilities to circumvent import limits; by 1990, over one-third of Japanese-brand vehicles sold in the U.S. were domestically assembled, rising to nearly all by the 2010s.[51] Supply chains became international, with components sourced from low-cost regions, enhancing cost efficiency but increasing vulnerability to disruptions.[52] In emerging markets, China's automotive sector exploded, with vehicle production growing from 2 million units in 2000 to over 18 million by 2010, surpassing the U.S. as the world's largest market in 2009 amid rapid urbanization and state-supported industrialization.[53][54] European and U.S. firms formed joint ventures in China to access this growth, while global production shares shifted dramatically: North America, Europe, and Japan accounted for 77% of output in 1997 but only 50% by 2009, with Asia's rise dominating.[55] Efficiency innovations included the introduction of hybrid powertrains, exemplified by Toyota's Prius, the first mass-produced hybrid launched in Japan in 1997 and in the U.S. in 2000, achieving around 40-50 mpg combined and spurring industry-wide adoption of electrification to meet tightening emissions rules like the European Euro standards and renewed U.S. CAFE hikes in the 2000s targeting 35 mpg by 2020.[56][57] Despite SUV sales booming from 1990 to 2000—rising from under 20% to over 40% of U.S. light-vehicle sales due to consumer preference for utility and a CAFE loophole—these vehicles averaged 20-25 mpg, offsetting earlier gains until post-2008 fuel price spikes and regulations reversed the trend.[50] By the 2010s, global automakers integrated advanced materials like aluminum and direct-injection engines, yielding incremental improvements of 1-2% annually in fleet efficiency amid offshoring that lowered labor costs but pressured domestic wages.[52][58]Digital integration and disruptions (2020s)
The 2020s marked a pivotal shift toward software-defined vehicles (SDVs), where centralized computing architectures replaced distributed electronic control units, enabling over-the-air (OTA) updates for features like infotainment, powertrain management, and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS).[59] By 2025, major automakers including Volkswagen, General Motors, and Tesla had adopted SDV platforms, with projections estimating US$755 billion in related hardware revenue by 2029.[60] This integration facilitated continuous software enhancements, reducing hardware dependency and accelerating feature deployment, though it demanded robust cybersecurity measures due to increased attack surfaces.[61] Connectivity advancements, including 5G integration and vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication, enhanced real-time data exchange for traffic management and predictive maintenance, with connected car shipments projected to dominate new vehicle sales by mid-decade.[62] ADAS features, such as Level 2+ autonomy with hands-free highway driving, became standard in premium models from manufacturers like Ford and Mercedes-Benz by 2023, relying on AI-driven sensors and cloud processing for improved safety and efficiency.[63] However, full Level 4 autonomy remained limited to geofenced operations, with experts forecasting widespread deployment only after 2035 due to regulatory, technical, and safety challenges.[64] Disruptions profoundly impacted digital integration efforts, beginning with the global semiconductor shortage exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which halted production of chip-intensive digital components. In 2021 alone, the automotive sector lost over 9.5 million light-vehicle units, equivalent to a 12% sales drop from 2019 levels and billions in revenue.[65] This crisis disproportionately affected SDVs and ADAS-equipped models, prompting automakers to prioritize legacy vehicles and delay software-heavy launches until supply stabilized by late 2023.[66] Cybersecurity vulnerabilities emerged as a critical disruption, with automotive cyber incidents surging from 57 in 2017 to 409 in 2024, including ransomware attacks on supply chains and remote exploits via connected interfaces.[67] High-profile events, such as the 2024 CDK Global ransomware attack disrupting over 15,000 North American dealerships and supply chain breaches affecting Jaguar Land Rover production, underscored the risks of digital interdependence.[68] [69] Regulatory responses, including EU mandates for vehicle cybersecurity certification by 2024, aimed to mitigate these threats, though industry reports highlighted persistent gaps in securing OTA updates and third-party software.[70]Engineering Fundamentals
Powertrain and propulsion mechanisms
The powertrain of a car comprises the engine or motor, transmission, driveshaft, differential, and axles, which collectively generate and transmit mechanical power to the drive wheels.[71] This system converts chemical or electrical energy into kinetic motion, with propulsion mechanisms varying by fuel type and configuration to optimize torque delivery, efficiency, and performance under load.[72] Primary propulsion in conventional cars relies on internal combustion engines (ICE), which burn gasoline or diesel in cylinders to drive pistons connected to a crankshaft, producing rotational force typically ranging from 100 to 500 horsepower in passenger vehicles.[73] Gasoline engines predominate in lighter cars for their higher power-to-weight ratio and smoother operation, achieving thermal efficiencies of 20-30% under real-world conditions, while diesel engines offer 30-40% efficiency due to higher compression ratios but produce greater torque suited for trucks.[73] Electric propulsion, by contrast, uses motors that convert electrical energy from batteries into torque with over 90% efficiency and instant response, eliminating multi-stage mechanical losses inherent in ICE systems.[74] Hybrid systems integrate an ICE with one or more electric motors, allowing regenerative braking to recharge batteries and enabling engine operation near peak efficiency points, yielding combined system efficiencies up to 40% in optimized designs like parallel hybrids.[75] Transmission mechanisms modulate engine output to match wheel speed and load, with manual transmissions requiring driver-operated clutches and gear levers for discrete ratios (typically 5-7 forward gears), offering direct control and up to 95% power transfer efficiency.[76] Automatic transmissions employ planetary gears and torque converters for seamless shifts, prioritizing convenience but incurring 10-15% efficiency losses from fluid coupling.[77] Continuously variable transmissions (CVTs) use belt-and-pulley systems to provide infinite ratios, enhancing fuel economy in low-load scenarios by maintaining optimal engine RPM, though they achieve around 88% efficiency and can exhibit "rubber-band" acceleration feel.[76] Drivetrain configurations distribute power to the wheels, with front-wheel drive (FWD) powering the front axle via a transaxle for compact packaging and 5-10% better fuel efficiency in urban driving due to reduced driveline mass.[78] Rear-wheel drive (RWD) propels the rear wheels through a longitudinal engine layout and driveshaft, favoring balance and traction under acceleration in performance vehicles but increasing understeer risk.[79] All-wheel drive (AWD) dynamically allocates torque to all four wheels via differentials and clutches for enhanced grip on slippery surfaces, while four-wheel drive (4WD) adds low-range gearing for off-road torque multiplication, though both incur 5-20% efficiency penalties from added components.[78][80]Structural components and materials
The primary structural components of an automobile include the chassis or frame, which provides the foundational skeleton supporting the powertrain, suspension, steering, and body, and the body-in-white, referring to the welded assembly of sheet metal panels forming the passenger compartment, roof, and exterior before painting and assembly.[81][82] These elements must balance load-bearing capacity, torsional rigidity for handling stability, and energy absorption for crash protection, with designs optimized via finite element analysis to distribute stresses from road impacts and vehicle mass, typically around 1,500–2,500 kg for sedans.[83] Two predominant frame architectures exist: body-on-frame, featuring a separate ladder-like chassis of longitudinal rails and cross-members bolted to the body shell, and unibody construction, where the body panels and floorpan integrate into a single stressed-skin structure. Body-on-frame systems, common in trucks and SUVs, offer superior durability for heavy payloads up to 3,000 kg and off-road abuse due to their modular repairability and resistance to twisting forces exceeding 20,000 Nm/degree in torsional stiffness tests, though they add 100–200 kg of weight compared to unibody equivalents, reducing fuel efficiency by 5–10%.[84][85] Unibody designs, standard in most passenger cars since the 1930s, achieve lighter weight through material efficiency and provide enhanced rigidity—often 30–50% higher than body-on-frame—facilitating precise handling and integrated crumple zones that deform predictably to absorb kinetic energy in collisions, dissipating up to 40% more impact force than rigid frames.[86][87] However, unibody repairs post-major damage require specialized jigging to restore alignment, increasing costs by 20–30% over frame straightening.[88] Materials selection prioritizes tensile strength-to-weight ratios, corrosion resistance, and manufacturability, with steel dominating at 50–60% of vehicle mass in conventional models due to its yield strengths from 200 MPa in mild forms to over 1,500 MPa in advanced high-strength variants like dual-phase or martensitic steels. High-strength steels, comprising about 20–25% of global automotive steel usage as of 2023, enable thinner gauges (0.7–1.2 mm) for weight savings of 10–15% without compromising crash performance, as evidenced by their role in reducing vehicle mass by up to 100 kg in models like the Ford F-150.[89][90] Aluminum alloys, such as 5xxx and 6xxx series with 200–500 MPa strengths, constitute 10–15% of structures in lightweighted vehicles, offering density one-third that of steel for 40–50% mass reduction in components like hoods and doors, though higher material costs (2–3 times steel) and lower formability limit adoption to 5–10% of production volume.[91][92] Composites like carbon fiber-reinforced polymers, with moduli up to 200 GPa, appear in high-performance niches for ultra-low weight (density ~1.6 g/cm³ vs. steel's 7.8 g/cm³), but their expense—10–20 times steel—and complex recycling constrain use to under 1% of mass in mass-market cars. Magnesium alloys and engineering plastics supplement for non-structural panels, aiding 5–10% overall weight cuts while maintaining formability for complex shapes.[93][94]Control systems and ergonomics
The primary control systems in automobiles enable drivers to regulate speed, direction, and stopping, typically comprising a steering wheel for directional control, accelerator and brake pedals for propulsion and deceleration, and a transmission selector for gear management. Early implementations relied on direct mechanical linkages, such as worm-and-sector or recirculating ball steering gears, which transmitted steering wheel torque via rods and levers to the front wheels.[95] Braking originated with mechanical drum systems using cable-actuated expanding shoes, while transmissions began as manual gearboxes with sliding gears shifted by hand levers.[96] These configurations prioritized simplicity but demanded significant physical input from drivers, particularly in heavier vehicles. Power assistance transformed control effort requirements, with hydraulic power steering emerging in the 1950s to amplify steering force via fluid pressure from an engine-driven pump, easing maneuverability at low speeds and during parking.[97] Rack-and-pinion steering, patented by Gustave Dumont in 1922, gained prevalence for its compactness and precision, often integrated with power systems.[98] By the 1980s, power steering appeared in nearly all new passenger cars, reducing driver fatigue and enabling control of larger vehicles.[99] Electronic variants supplanted hydraulics starting with the 1988 Suzuki Cervo, employing electric motors and sensors to provide variable assistance based on speed and conditions, yielding fuel savings of 3-5% through elimination of parasitic pump drag and facilitating integration with electronic stability control.[100] Electro-hydraulic hybrids bridged the transition, but full electric power steering (EPS) dominates modern designs for its responsiveness and reduced maintenance, though it can introduce artificial feedback lacking the road feel of hydraulic systems.[101] Braking advanced to hydraulic actuation by the 1930s, using fluid pressure for even force distribution across wheels, followed by disc brakes in the 1950s for superior heat dissipation and fade resistance over drums.[102] Anti-lock braking systems (ABS), prototyped in the 1970s and commercialized in the 1980s by Bosch, modulate brake pressure to prevent wheel lockup on slippery surfaces, correlating with 20-30% reductions in fatal single-vehicle crashes per National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) analyses of real-world data.[103] Traction control, extending similar principles to acceleration, emerged in the late 1980s to mitigate wheel spin, enhancing stability in low-grip scenarios.[103] Transmission controls shifted from manual clutches to automatics via torque converters, as in the 1940 Oldsmobile Hydra-Matic, with electronic shift-by-wire systems in contemporary vehicles allowing paddle shifters and adaptive algorithms.[96] Ergonomics in control systems focuses on aligning interfaces with human anthropometry and cognitive limits to minimize error and fatigue, guided by principles from NHTSA human factors research emphasizing reach, visibility, and reaction times.[104] Controls are positioned within 5th-95th percentile male/female reach envelopes—typically accelerator and brake pedals 10-15 inches from the seat reference point, steering wheels at 16-18 inches—to accommodate 90% of drivers without adjustment strain. Dashboard layouts prioritize primary controls (pedals, wheel) for low visual demand, with secondary functions like climate or infotainment secondary to avoid glances exceeding 2 seconds off-road, per NHTSA distraction guidelines informed by crash data linking inattention to 17% of incidents.[105] International standards, such as ISO 16121, specify ergonomic seating for lumbar support and eye height alignment (12-13 inches above seat) to maintain forward visibility over 20-30 degrees, reducing neck strain and blind-spot risks.[106] Haptic and auditory cues supplement visual feedback in modern interfaces, with tactile steering wheel vibrations signaling lane departure and audible alerts for proximity, calibrated to avoid overload per SAE human-machine interface recommendations.[107] However, proliferation of touchscreen-based controls has drawn scrutiny for increasing cognitive load, as touch interfaces lack the proprioceptive certainty of physical knobs, potentially elevating distraction in dynamic driving per NHTSA studies.[108] Effective ergonomic integration demonstrably lowers mishap rates; for instance, intuitive pedal spacing prevents inadvertent errors, contributing to overall vehicle safety efficacy beyond passive structures.[104]Safety integrations in design
Safety integrations in automobile design emphasize passive safety features embedded in the vehicle's structural framework to manage collision forces and minimize occupant injury. These features operate without driver input, relying on inherent material properties and geometry to absorb kinetic energy through controlled deformation while preserving a protected occupant space. Core to this approach is the bifurcated body structure: deformable front and rear sections, known as crumple zones, which progressively collapse to extend deceleration time and reduce peak forces transmitted to passengers, paired with a rigid central passenger compartment or safety cage that resists intrusion. This design paradigm, formalized by Hungarian-Austrian engineer Béla Barényi, was patented by Mercedes-Benz on January 23, 1951, under German patent no. 854157, establishing the foundational principle for separating energy-absorbing zones from a stable survival cell.[109][110] The safety cage integrates high-integrity components including A-, B-, and C-pillars, roof rails, floor pans, and side sills, engineered to maintain habitable volume amid frontal, side, or rear impacts by distributing loads and preventing cabin deformation. Materials selection plays a critical role, with advanced high-strength steels (AHSS) employed for their superior yield strengths above 550 MPa and tensile capacities exceeding 780 MPa in ultra-high-strength variants, enabling precise energy dissipation through tailored microstructures that balance ductility for absorption with rigidity for protection. These steels facilitate lighter yet equivalently robust structures compared to conventional mild steels, as demonstrated in crash simulations where AHSS configurations absorb impacts via phase transformations and work hardening, reducing intrusion by up to 30% in side impacts relative to non-AHSS designs.[111][112][113] Further refinements include side-impact door beams, typically hollow steel intrusions rated for 5-10 kN force resistance, and enhanced roof structures tested to withstand 3-4 times the vehicle's curb weight in rollover scenarios per federal standards. These elements interconnect with restraint systems, such as seatbelt anchorages rigidly mounted to the cage and airbag sensors calibrated to structural response thresholds, ensuring synchronized deployment. Empirical validation through full-vehicle crash tests, as conducted by entities like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, confirms that such integrations have correlated with fatality reductions of 20-50% in offset frontal collisions since widespread adoption in the 1960s, though efficacy varies with vehicle mass disparities and real-world impact angles not fully replicable in labs.[114][115]
Operational Safety
Historical accident trends and data
In the United States, motor vehicle fatalities began being systematically recorded in the early 20th century, with 4,200 deaths reported in 1913 amid nascent automobile adoption, rudimentary road infrastructure, and absent safety standards such as seat belts or crashworthy designs.[116] Absolute numbers escalated with rising vehicle ownership and mileage, reaching approximately 36,000 deaths by 1950 and peaking above 53,000 in 1972, coinciding with post-World War II suburban expansion and higher traffic volumes.[117] Fatality rates, measured per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT), remained elevated—often exceeding 5 deaths per 100 million VMT through the 1960s—reflecting causal factors like inadequate vehicle structural integrity, driver inexperience, and inconsistent traffic enforcement.[118] Post-1970 regulatory interventions, including the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, correlated with a sustained decline in rates: from 4.9 deaths per 100 million VMT in 1975 to 1.26 in 2023, a reduction driven by engineering advancements like antilock brakes, electronic stability control, and improved crash energy management rather than reduced usage.[119][120] Per capita rates similarly dropped 41% from 1975 to 2023, even as population and VMT grew exponentially, underscoring the efficacy of passive safety features in mitigating kinetic energy transfer during collisions.[120] Absolute fatalities stabilized around 40,000–45,000 annually from the 1990s onward, with a notable 20% spike from 2019 to 2021 attributed to pandemic-related behavioral shifts like reduced enforcement and increased speeding, though rates per VMT resumed declining by 2023 to 40,901 deaths.[121][119] Globally, road traffic deaths numbered over 1.2 million annually in recent years, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries where vehicle fleets incorporate fewer safety technologies and infrastructure lags.[122] Historical data pre-1950s is sparse outside Europe and North America, but trends mirror U.S. patterns in developed regions: rates fell sharply post-1970s due to imported safety standards, though absolute figures rose with motorization in Asia and Africa, reaching 1.35 million in 2018 per World Health Organization estimates before stabilizing.[123] In Europe, fatalities per billion kilometers traveled declined from 20 in 1970 to under 5 by 2020, attributable to mandatory standards like the European New Car Assessment Programme emphasizing real-world crash kinematics.[124]| Period | U.S. Fatalities (approx.) | Rate per 100M VMT | Key Causal Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1913–1950 | 4,200 to 36,000 | >5 (early estimates) | Poor roads, no restraints[116][118] |
| 1950s–1970s | 36,000–53,000 peak | 4–5 | Volume growth, pre-regulation designs[117] |
| 1980s–2010s | 40,000–45,000 | 1.5–2 | Safety tech adoption (e.g., airbags)[125] |
| 2020s | 40,000–46,000 | 1.2–1.3 | Behavioral risks offsetting gains[119][121] |
Passive and structural protections
Passive safety features in automobiles encompass design elements and restraints that mitigate injury severity after a collision has occurred, without requiring preemptive action from the vehicle or driver. These include crumple zones, which deform to absorb kinetic energy, rigid passenger compartments that maintain occupant space, and supplemental restraints such as seat belts and airbags. Structural protections integrate high-strength materials and reinforcements to preserve the integrity of the habitable zone during impacts.[128][115] Crumple zones, pioneered by Mercedes-Benz engineer Béla Barényi and implemented in production vehicles starting in 1959, are engineered sections at the front and rear of the vehicle that progressively collapse upon impact, extending the deceleration time and reducing peak forces transmitted to occupants. This design principle dissipates crash energy through controlled deformation, often using materials like high-strength steel or aluminum that buckle in a predetermined manner, thereby shielding the passenger cell—a fortified central structure intended to remain intact. In frontal crashes, crumple zones can absorb up to 50-70% of impact energy, depending on vehicle specifics and collision speed, though their efficacy diminishes in high-speed or offset impacts where compatibility with other vehicles becomes a factor.[129][130][131] Seat belts, mandatory in many jurisdictions since the 1960s and 1970s, serve as the foundational passive restraint, securing occupants to prevent ejection or excessive movement within the cabin. Lap-shoulder belts reduce the risk of fatal injury to front-seat passenger car occupants by 45% and moderate-to-critical injuries by 50% when used properly. In 2016, seat belts saved an estimated 14,955 lives in the United States, with an additional 2,549 lives potentially saved had universal compliance occurred. Effectiveness data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) underscore belts' role in countering inertial forces, though improper use—such as positioning the shoulder strap behind the back—can exacerbate injuries like spinal fractures.[132][133][134] Airbags augment seat belts by providing rapid cushioning against hard surfaces, deploying in milliseconds via sensors detecting deceleration thresholds. Frontal airbags, combined with belts, further lower fatality risks, while side-impact variants—such as torso and head-curtain types—reduce driver death risk in nearside crashes by 37% for head-protecting models and 26% for torso-only. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) analyses confirm these benefits derive from distributed impact forces over larger areas, though standalone airbag efficacy is limited without belts, and rare deployment malfunctions have caused injuries. Knee airbags show minimal statistically significant injury reduction in real-world data, primarily aiding lower-leg protection in frontal offsets.[135][136][137] Structural reinforcements, including side-impact door beams made from advanced high-strength steels (AHSS) or ultra-high-strength steels (UHSS), enhance lateral crash resistance by resisting intrusion and preserving door integrity. These beams, often tubular extrusions spanning the door's height, distribute forces to the vehicle's frame, reducing cabin deformation by up to 30% in standardized side tests. Roof structures, evaluated via IIHS protocols involving hydraulic presses simulating rollover loads, must withstand forces equivalent to 3-4 times the vehicle's weight to earn top ratings, employing reinforced pillars and cross-members to prevent crush and ejection. Such designs, while effective against single-vehicle rollovers, face challenges in multi-vehicle scenarios where mass disparities influence outcomes.[138][139][140]Active technologies and driver aids
Active safety technologies in automobiles intervene dynamically to avert loss of vehicle control or imminent collisions, relying on sensors, actuators, and control algorithms to modulate braking, steering, or acceleration. These systems, evolving from basic stability aids to sophisticated advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), aim to compensate for human error, which accounts for over 90% of crashes according to U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) analyses.[141] Effectiveness varies by technology and conditions, with empirical data showing reductions in specific crash types but limitations in adverse weather, sensor occlusion, or driver inattention. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS), introduced widely in the 1990s, prevent wheel lockup during hard braking by pulsing brake pressure, preserving steering responsiveness. Real-world evaluations indicate ABS yields a 6% reduction in overall crash involvement for passenger cars and 8% for light trucks and vans, though benefits are more pronounced in wet or slippery conditions where lockup would otherwise occur.[142] Traction control systems (TCS), often integrated with ABS, curb wheel spin during acceleration by selectively braking or reducing engine power, contributing to stability in low-grip scenarios but showing less isolated crash reduction data due to bundling with other aids. Electronic stability control (ESC), mandated in the U.S. for all passenger vehicles since 2012, employs yaw rate sensors, accelerometers, and selective wheel braking or engine torque adjustment to counteract skids. NHTSA estimates ESC reduces fatal single-vehicle crashes by 38% in cars and 56% in SUVs, while Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) data confirm 31% fewer fatal single-vehicle involvements for cars and 50% for SUVs.[143][144] These gains stem from mitigating oversteer and understeer, common in rollovers and run-off-road incidents, though ESC performs less effectively on uneven surfaces or during extreme maneuvers. ADAS features like automatic emergency braking (AEB) use radar, lidar, or cameras to detect obstacles and autonomously apply brakes if the driver fails to respond. IIHS and NHTSA studies report AEB reduces rear-end crashes by 38-50%, with low-speed variants cutting front-to-rear injury crashes by 45%.[145][146] Complementary aids include lane departure warning/prevention, which vibrates the steering wheel or applies corrective torque to avert drift, and blind-spot monitoring, which alerts to adjacent vehicles during lane changes; IIHS ratings show these collectively lower crash rates by 10-20% in equipped fleets.[147] Adaptive cruise control maintains following distances via radar, reducing fatigue-related rear-end risks, though integration with AEB amplifies benefits. Despite proven interventions, active systems face causal limitations: sensors degrade in fog, rain, or dirt, yielding false positives or negatives, and behavioral adaptation—where drivers increase speed or inattention due to perceived safety—can erode net gains. AAA Foundation research demonstrates that prolonged ADAS exposure nearly doubles distracted driving time, fostering complacency and skill atrophy.[148][149] Real-world efficacy thus hinges on driver vigilance, with overreliance risking higher severity in system failures, underscoring that these aids augment rather than supplant human control.Regulatory standards and efficacy critiques
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), established under the 1966 National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, administers the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), which mandate minimum performance requirements for vehicle design, including crashworthiness features like seat belts (FMVSS 208, updated 1989 for automatic belts and airbags), roof crush resistance (FMVSS 216, 2005), and electronic stability control (FMVSS 126, 2012).[150][151] Complementary voluntary programs, such as the U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP, launched 1978), provide star ratings based on crash tests exceeding FMVSS thresholds, influencing manufacturer designs through consumer information.[150] Internationally, the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP, 1997) imposes stricter protocols, including pedestrian protection and advanced driver aids, often driving global harmonization but creating trade-offs for U.S.-bound models prioritizing occupant safety.[152] Empirical data indicate substantial efficacy in reducing fatalities. NHTSA estimates that FMVSS-associated technologies, from laminated windshields (1966) to airbags and stability control, lowered U.S. passenger vehicle occupant fatality risk by 64% from 1968 to 2019, saving 865,706 lives overall, with 40,348 averted in 2019 alone.[153] Highway fatality rates per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) declined from 5.5 in 1966 to 1.1 by 2016, correlating with standards implementation, though confounded by improved roads and seat belt use (mandated variably by state from 1985).[117] Post-1967 models showed 23% fewer occupant deaths per 100,000 vehicles than 1964-1967 models and 39% fewer than pre-1964, per controlled analyses.[154] Euro NCAP has similarly elevated baseline safety, with rated vehicles demonstrating lower real-world injury risks in offset frontal crashes, though correlations weaken for side impacts.[155] Critiques highlight limitations in net efficacy, including behavioral offsets and economic burdens. Risk compensation theory, evidenced in studies of seat belt mandates, suggests drivers increase speed and risk-taking, partially eroding gains; one analysis found belts reduced individual fatalities but raised total accidents via spillover effects.[156][157] FMVSS compliance adds 2,000 per vehicle in costs, disproportionately affecting low-income buyers by raising prices and reducing affordability, with benefit-cost ratios questioned when valuing statistical lives at NHTSA's $9.6 million (2023) figure yields overstated returns amid incomplete quantification of injury quality-of-life losses.[158][159] U.S. NCAP's focus on high-speed crashes overlooks low-speed urban incidents prevalent in real data, while Euro NCAP's pedestrian emphasis may incentivize heavier, less maneuverable designs, potentially increasing overall crash severity.[160] NHTSA's self-reported lives-saved models, reliant on fatality data extrapolated without full controls for exposure or driver demographics, invite skepticism given institutional incentives to justify regulatory expansion.[151] Diminishing returns persist, as post-2000 fatality drops owe more to electronics than structural mandates, per disaggregated reviews.[161]Economic Dimensions
Manufacturing scale and costs
The introduction of the moving assembly line by Ford Motor Company in 1913 revolutionized automobile manufacturing by enabling mass production, which dramatically reduced assembly time from over 12 hours to approximately 1.5 hours per vehicle.[162] This innovation, applied to the Model T, lowered the vehicle's price from $825 in 1908 to $260 by 1925 through efficiencies in labor division and inventory reduction.[162] [163] Such economies of scale established the foundation for the industry's growth, requiring high production volumes to amortize fixed costs like tooling and plant setup.[164] Global light vehicle production reached approximately 89.1 million units in 2024, reflecting a 1.6% decline from 2023 amid supply chain challenges and regional variations.[165] China dominated output, accounting for nearly one-third of worldwide production, followed by the United States and Japan.[166] Toyota Group led manufacturers with over 8.5 million units sold in 2023, capturing about 11% market share, underscoring the concentration among top firms that leverage global supply chains for scale.[167] Manufacturing a standard passenger car typically costs between $15,000 and $25,000, with raw materials and components comprising the largest share, often exceeding 50% of total expenses due to steel, aluminum, plastics, and electronics.[168] [169] Labor accounts for a smaller portion in automated facilities, estimated at 10-15% in high-volume plants, while overhead including R&D, logistics, and depreciation adds further layers.[170] Electric vehicles incur higher upfront costs from batteries, potentially elevating totals by 20-30% over internal combustion equivalents.[168] Contemporary economies of scale demand assembly plants produce 200,000 to 300,000 units annually to achieve cost efficiency, with automation mitigating labor expenses in developed markets and enabling competitiveness against low-wage regions like China.[171] Regional disparities persist, as higher U.S. and European labor and regulatory costs—often critiqued for inflating overhead without proportional productivity gains—contrast with Asia's volume-driven advantages, influencing outsourcing trends.[172]Consumer ownership economics
The total cost of ownership for a new vehicle in the United States averaged $12,297 annually in 2024, equivalent to $1,024 per month or $0.82 per mile driven, based on 15,000 miles per year.[173] This figure encompasses depreciation, financing, fuel or electricity, maintenance, repairs, insurance, licensing, registration, and taxes, with depreciation comprising the largest share at approximately 49% of costs for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.[174] Costs have risen steadily, increasing 13% from 2022 to 2023 due to higher vehicle prices, parts inflation, and repair complexity.[175] Depreciation represents a primary economic burden, as new vehicles typically lose 20-30% of value in the first year and around 50% over five years, with luxury models and electric vehicles (EVs) depreciating faster at rates up to 53% in three years for certain Tesla models.[176] Internal combustion engine vehicles average $0.11 per mile in depreciation, compared to $0.27 per mile for EVs, reflecting higher initial purchase prices and market saturation effects on resale values.[177] Used vehicles mitigate this by entering ownership at lower entry points, though they incur higher maintenance from accumulated wear. Operating expenses include maintenance and repairs, averaging $792 to $900 annually or 10.13 cents per mile, with brands like Toyota and Honda under $500 yearly at five years versus over $1,000 for European luxury marques.[178][179] Insurance costs for full coverage averaged $2,149 per year in 2025, varying by state, driver profile, and vehicle type, with EVs often facing premiums 10-20% higher due to repair complexities from batteries and specialized parts.[180] Fuel for ICE vehicles contributes about 16% of total costs at current prices, while EV charging yields lower energy expenses but requires home infrastructure investments not always captured in standard calculations.[174] Comparisons between EVs and ICE vehicles reveal nuanced economics, with upfront EV prices averaging $58,940 versus $48,008 for ICE in 2024, leading to higher total ownership costs for over half of EV models over five years absent subsidies.[181][182] While EVs benefit from reduced maintenance and fuel costs—potentially lowering five-year totals for 48% of models—their faster depreciation and battery replacement risks (post-warranty, exceeding $10,000 in some cases) offset gains for many owners.[183] Federal tax credits up to $7,500 have propped up EV adoption, but removing them would reduce purchases by about 29%, distorting market signals and inflating perceived affordability.[184] Regulatory mandates like Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards further elevate costs by $11 billion annually per one-mpg increase, passed to consumers via higher prices.[185] Leasing shifts risks like depreciation to manufacturers but incurs ongoing payments averaging $500-700 monthly for mid-size vehicles, often exceeding buying costs over time for low-mileage drivers, while used car purchases—now 70% of transactions—offer the lowest entry barriers at median prices under $30,000.[186] Ownership economics favor durable, high-resale models like Toyota Corolla, retaining 60% value after five years, underscoring the value of empirical reliability data over subsidized novelties.[187]| Cost Component | Annual Average (2024, New Vehicle) | Per Mile (15,000 miles) |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation | $6,029 | 40.2¢ |
| Fuel/Energy | $1,960 (ICE); lower for EV | 13.1¢ (ICE) |
| Maintenance/Repairs | 900 | 5.3-6.0¢ |
| Insurance | $2,149 | 14.3¢ |
Broader market and trade dynamics
The global automotive market in 2024 saw production exceeding 92 million vehicles, with trade in cars and parts contributing significantly to international commerce amid shifting production centers and protectionist policies.[188] China emerged as the dominant producer and exporter, surpassing all others in car exports by December 2024, driven by state-supported manufacturing that boosted its output share while raising concerns over market distortions from subsidies and overcapacity. In contrast, the European Union experienced a 6.2% decline in car production to 11.4 million units, with export values to key markets like the United States dropping 4.6% due to rising tariffs and competitive pressures from Asian imports.[189] Trade imbalances are pronounced, particularly in the United States, where automotive exports reached $104 billion against $309 billion in imports, yielding a $205 billion deficit in 2024; Mexico supplied 22.8% of U.S. car imports, valued at nearly $50 billion, underscoring North American integration under agreements like the USMCA.[190][191] Major global exporters include Japan, Germany, and South Korea, but China's export growth of 16.2% from 2023 reflects aggressive expansion into Europe, where Chinese vehicle imports exceeded 300,000 units in 2024, capturing 2.5% market penetration despite EU probes into subsidized pricing.[192][193] Tariffs have intensified trade frictions, with U.S. policies imposing 25% duties on imported automobiles and parts—excluding certain U.S.-content exceptions—and 15% on EU autos effective retroactively in 2025, potentially raising costs for European exporters and accelerating supply chain regionalization.[194][195] These measures, alongside ongoing U.S.-China tensions, target dependencies on Chinese components like semiconductors and lithium batteries, which tariffs now encumber, prompting automakers to diversify sourcing amid persistent shortages that have constrained global output since 2021.[196][197] Such vulnerabilities, exacerbated by cyclical semiconductor demand and geopolitical risks, have led to production bottlenecks and higher vehicle prices, with U.S. auto parts imports hitting a record $197.3 billion in 2024 against $82.8 billion in exports.[198][199] Supply chain interdependencies further shape trade flows, as electric vehicle transitions amplify reliance on battery minerals concentrated in China, while semiconductor disruptions—such as those from supplier Nexperia in October 2025—threaten delivery guarantees and expose foundational weaknesses in just-in-time manufacturing models.[200][201] Efforts to onshore critical inputs, including U.S. incentives for domestic semiconductor fabs, aim to mitigate these risks but face delays from inventory adjustments and regional mismatches in expertise.[202][203] Overall, these dynamics favor producers with integrated, low-cost ecosystems like China, while importers in the West grapple with escalating protectionism that prioritizes resilience over efficiency.[204]Contributions to prosperity and innovation
The adoption of the moving assembly line by Henry Ford's company in 1913 revolutionized manufacturing processes, reducing the assembly time for a Model T from approximately 12 hours to 93 minutes and slashing production costs, which enabled the mass production of affordable vehicles.[205] This efficiency gain raised labor productivity by one to two orders of magnitude, transforming automobiles from luxury items into accessible goods for the working class and stimulating broader economic expansion through scaled consumer access to personal mobility.[205] Ford's simultaneous introduction of a $5 daily wage in 1914—roughly double the industry average—doubled worker pay, reduced turnover, and increased disposable income, thereby creating a feedback loop where higher wages fueled demand for the very products workers produced, laying foundational dynamics for modern consumer-driven prosperity.[206] The automotive industry's scale has sustained substantial contributions to national economies, with the U.S. sector alone representing about 3% of gross domestic product and supporting nearly 10 million jobs through direct employment, supply chains, and induced effects.[207] [208] Globally, it accounts for roughly 3.65% of GDP, generating ancillary economic activity in steel, electronics, logistics, and services while facilitating $105 billion in annual U.S. exports as of recent data.[164] [208] These multipliers extend to infrastructure development and trade, as widespread car ownership expanded labor markets, tourism, and just-in-time supply chains, historically propelling GDP growth rates in industrialized nations during the 20th century.[209] Automobiles have catalyzed innovation beyond vehicles themselves, with the sector's annual research and development expenditures of $16 to $18 billion in the U.S.—predominantly industry-funded—yielding breakthroughs in materials science, precision engineering, and embedded computing that diffused to aerospace, consumer electronics, and medical devices.[210] Mass production techniques pioneered in auto plants influenced global manufacturing standards, while ongoing advancements in powertrains and safety systems have driven efficiency gains and safety improvements applicable across industries, underscoring the car's role as a vector for technological progress and sustained economic vitality.[211][212]Environmental Realities
Lifecycle emissions of combustion vehicles
Lifecycle emissions of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles encompass greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, expressed in CO₂ equivalents, across all phases: raw material extraction, vehicle manufacturing and assembly, fuel production and distribution, operational use, and end-of-life disposal or recycling. These assessments, often conducted using models like Argonne National Laboratory's GREET, reveal that operational tailpipe emissions dominate, accounting for 70-80% of the total, driven by fuel combustion. Fuel cycle emissions, including crude oil extraction, refining, and transport, contribute 15-25%, while vehicle production adds 8-12%, primarily from steel, aluminum, and component fabrication. End-of-life emissions are minimal, around 1-3%, with recycling of materials like metals providing offsets of up to 20-30% of production emissions.[213] For a typical U.S. mid-size gasoline sedan with an average fuel economy of 25-30 miles per gallon and a lifetime of 150,000-200,000 miles, total lifecycle GHG emissions average 410 grams CO₂e per mile. Tailpipe combustion alone yields about 340-350 g CO₂e per mile for current fleet averages, with upstream fuel processes adding 70-90 g CO₂e per mile. Vehicle manufacturing emits 5-8 metric tons CO₂e upfront, amortizing to 30-50 g CO₂e per mile over the vehicle's life. Diesel ICE vehicles show similar totals, around 380-420 g CO₂e per mile, benefiting from higher efficiency but offset by elevated refining emissions and black carbon factors in CO₂e calculations.[214][215][216]| Lifecycle Phase | Approximate Share (%) | Example Contribution (g CO₂e/mile) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing | 8-12 | 35-50 |
| Fuel Production & Distribution | 15-25 | 70-90 |
| Operation (Tailpipe) | 70-80 | 280-320 |
| End-of-Life | 1-3 (net after recycling) | 5-10 |
Electric propulsion: advantages and hidden costs
Electric propulsion in automobiles employs electric motors driven by high-capacity batteries, providing operational efficiencies surpassing those of internal combustion engines (ICEs). Electric motors convert over 90% of electrical energy into mechanical power, compared to 20-40% thermal efficiency in gasoline or diesel engines, minimizing losses to heat and friction.[218][219] This high efficiency translates to lower energy consumption per mile under ideal conditions, with regenerative braking recovering kinetic energy during deceleration.[218] A key performance advantage is the delivery of maximum torque at zero RPM, enabling instant acceleration without gear shifts or clutching, which enhances drivability and off-road capability in some models.[220][221] Electric vehicles (EVs) also operate more quietly, reducing noise pollution in urban settings.[219] From an emissions perspective, EVs eliminate tailpipe exhaust of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulates, improving local air quality. Lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) assessments for 2023-2025 models show EVs achieving 60-73% lower total emissions than comparable ICE vehicles in regions like the European Union or the United States, where grids average under 400 grams CO2 per kWh, assuming 150,000-200,000 mile lifetimes and including production, use, and disposal phases.[222][223][224] These savings stem primarily from operational efficiency, though they require grids cleaner than those in coal-reliant areas like parts of India or China, where EV lifecycle emissions may equal or exceed ICE equivalents.[225][226] However, these advantages obscure substantial hidden environmental costs concentrated in upstream production. Manufacturing an EV battery emits 50-100% more GHGs than building an equivalent ICE vehicle, with a mid-size EV battery (60-100 kWh) contributing 10-20 tons of CO2-equivalent upfront, often from coal-powered factories in Asia.[227][214] This "carbon debt" from mining, refining, and assembly delays breakeven until 20,000-50,000 miles of driving, depending on grid intensity.[227] Resource extraction amplifies these burdens: lithium production via evaporation ponds in South America's "Lithium Triangle" consumes up to 500,000 liters of water per ton, exacerbating scarcity in arid basins and contaminating groundwater with chemicals.[228] Cobalt mining, predominantly in the Democratic Republic of Congo (over 70% of global supply), generates toxic tailings that pollute rivers and soils, while artisanal operations release heavy metals and acids, affecting local ecosystems and communities.[229][230] Nickel and graphite sourcing similarly involves deforestation and high-energy smelting, with supply risks elevated due to concentrated deposits and geopolitical dependencies.[231] Grid dependency introduces variability and systemic costs: charging emissions track electricity sources, potentially rising with peak demand from mass adoption without storage or renewables scaling.[225] In 2023, U.S. EVs offset about 50% less emissions in coal-heavy states versus renewables-rich ones.[224] Battery end-of-life poses further challenges, as global recycling recovers under 5% of lithium and cobalt, leading to resource depletion and improper disposal risks like fires or leaching in landfills.[232] Emerging closed-loop processes could mitigate this, but as of 2025, they process only a fraction of retired packs.[231] Overall, while electric propulsion offers verifiable efficiency gains, its net environmental superiority hinges on unresolved externalities in materials and energy systems.[233]Resource extraction and infrastructure burdens
The production of automobiles demands substantial quantities of metals, with an average passenger vehicle incorporating approximately 900 kilograms of steel for its chassis and body panels, alongside 100-200 kilograms of aluminum for components like engine blocks and wheels.[234] [235] Extraction of iron ore for steel and bauxite for aluminum involves large-scale open-pit mining operations that lead to deforestation, soil erosion, and habitat fragmentation, contributing to biodiversity loss in mining regions.[236] Copper mining for wiring and electronics further exacerbates these effects through energy-intensive processes that release pollutants into air and water, with metal production alone accounting for over 70 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually in the United States.[237] Electric vehicles impose additional extraction burdens due to battery requirements, necessitating lithium, cobalt, and nickel sourcing that amplifies environmental degradation. Lithium extraction from brine deposits or hard rock is highly water-intensive, depleting local aquifers and generating toxic waste brines that contaminate soil and groundwater in regions like South America's Lithium Triangle.[228] Cobalt mining, predominantly in the Democratic Republic of Congo, involves artisanal and industrial operations that release heavy metals into waterways and cause deforestation across thousands of hectares, while nickel processing emits sulfur dioxide and other airborne toxins.[230] These processes result in upfront lifecycle impacts for EVs that exceed those of internal combustion engine vehicles by factors of 1.5 to 2 in production-phase resource use and emissions, driven primarily by battery manufacturing.[238] [228] Supporting automotive mobility requires expansive infrastructure, including a global paved road network exceeding 14 million kilometers, constructed largely from asphalt (25.6% of material stock) derived from petroleum refining and concrete (1.5%), which demands limestone quarrying and cement production emitting up to 8% of global CO2.[239] [240] Road construction disrupts ecosystems through habitat clearance, soil compaction, and sedimentation in waterways, while ongoing maintenance generates nonpoint source pollution from runoff carrying oils, heavy metals, and tire particulates into ecosystems.[241] [8] These activities also produce noise, dust, and vibrations that affect wildlife migration and local air quality during building phases.[242]Comparative efficacy against alternatives
Buses and trains typically demonstrate lower operational greenhouse gas emissions per passenger-kilometer than private cars when achieving high load factors, with European long-distance rail averaging 31 grams of CO2 equivalent per passenger-kilometer in 2022, compared to 120-200 grams for gasoline-powered cars assuming 1.5-1.6 occupants.[243] [244] Electric variants further reduce rail and bus figures to as low as 4-35 grams per passenger-kilometer for efficient high-speed services, though real-world averages rise with lower occupancy.[244] Private cars, by contrast, maintain higher emissions due to inherent single-occupancy tendencies and less aerodynamic efficiency at varied speeds, with U.S. data showing average personal vehicle CO2 at 0.47 pounds (213 grams) per passenger-mile, or about 132 grams per passenger-kilometer.[245] Lifecycle assessments, incorporating vehicle manufacturing, fuel production, and infrastructure, amplify cars' disadvantages relative to rail, where total emissions for passenger trains often fall below 50 grams per passenger-kilometer, versus 150-250 grams for internal combustion engine cars including upstream oil extraction.[246] Electric cars mitigate operational emissions to 40-100 grams per passenger-kilometer depending on grid carbon intensity, but battery production adds 10-20% to lifecycle totals, eroding advantages over diesel buses (50-100 grams per passenger-kilometer at 50% load) in fossil-fuel-dominant regions.[246] Empirical critiques note that public transit's purported superiority often assumes peak-hour loads unrealistic for off-peak or suburban use, where buses can exceed car emissions per actual passenger-kilometer traveled.[247] Aviation exhibits the highest emissions among motorized alternatives, with short-haul flights at 150-255 grams per passenger-kilometer due to fuel inefficiency at low altitudes, rendering cars comparatively efficacious for regional travel under full occupancy.[248] Non-motorized options like bicycles and walking achieve near-zero direct emissions, reducing short-trip impacts by up to 75% versus cars, though scalability is constrained by physical limits and infrastructure needs.[244]| Transport Mode | Approximate Lifecycle GHG Emissions (g CO2-eq/pkm) | Key Assumptions |
|---|---|---|
| Rail (electric, high-speed) | 10-50 | High occupancy (>70%), clean grid[246] |
| Bus (diesel/electric) | 20-100 | 40-60% load factor[243] |
| Car (gasoline, 1.5 occ.) | 120-200 | Urban/suburban mix, includes fuel cycle[244] |
| Car (electric) | 40-100 | Grid-dependent, battery lifecycle included[246] |
| Airplane (short-haul) | 150-255 | Includes radiative forcing[248] |
Societal Ramifications
Enabling individual autonomy and mobility
The automobile revolutionized personal transportation by enabling on-demand mobility independent of collective schedules, such as those imposed by rail or bus systems, which historically restricted travel to predefined routes and times. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, horse-drawn vehicles and early public transit limited individual range to local areas or required advance planning, constraining spontaneous decision-making and access to distant opportunities. Cars granted users direct control over departure, direction, and pace, allowing point-to-point journeys that aligned with personal needs rather than communal timetables. This shift empowered individuals to pursue work, trade, or recreation without reliance on others, fundamentally expanding the scope of daily life.[250] Empirical data links car ownership to enhanced economic mobility, particularly for disadvantaged groups. Households with vehicle access experience doubled likelihood of obtaining employment and quadrupled chances of retaining jobs, as cars bridge distances to available positions beyond public transit reach.[251] For low-income families, automobiles serve as a critical tool for social ascent, correlating with higher earnings and sustained workforce participation by facilitating commutes to higher-wage or specialized roles.[252] One econometric analysis estimates the annual value of personal car ownership and use at approximately $11,197 in the United States, underscoring its quantifiable contribution to autonomy in daily economic activities.[253] Beyond employment, cars promote broader autonomy by providing reliable access to healthcare, education, and markets, reducing dependence on variable public options. In rural or suburban settings, where transit infrastructure lags, personal vehicles prevent isolation, enabling participation in community and family events on individual terms. This flexibility has underpinned suburban expansion and a century of economic expansion, as automobiles connected dispersed populations to urban centers and vice versa, driving productivity through voluntary relocation and specialization.[250] While critics argue cars foster dependency on infrastructure, the causal evidence from ownership studies affirms their net role in liberating individuals from geographic constraints, prioritizing empirical outcomes over ideological narratives of collective transport superiority.[254]Infrastructure dependencies and urban evolution
The automobile's operation hinges on expansive infrastructure, including paved roads, bridges, highways, parking facilities, and refueling stations, which collectively demand significant land allocation and maintenance resources. In the United States, the Interstate Highway System exemplifies this dependency; authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 and signed into law by President Dwight D. Eisenhower on June 29, 1956, it spans over 46,700 miles as of recent assessments, facilitating high-speed intercity travel but requiring ongoing federal and state investments exceeding billions annually. Globally, road networks underpin vehicular mobility, with cars accounting for approximately 51% of commutes worldwide as of 2024, underscoring the systemic reliance on asphalt surfaces that often exceed the spatial footprint of alternative transport modes.[255][256][257] This infrastructure paradigm profoundly shaped urban evolution, particularly through post-World War II suburbanization in developed nations. In the U.S., the diffusion of affordable automobiles from the 1910s onward, accelerating after 1945 with rising incomes and highway expansions, drove decentralization; econometric models attribute the full extent of suburban population shifts between 1910 and 1970 to automotive adoption, explaining about 70% of the concurrent surge in household car ownership. Such developments separated residential zones from commercial and employment centers, fostering low-density sprawl that prioritized vehicular access over walkability or mass transit, as evidenced by the meteoric rise of suburbs decoupled from pre-war streetcar-oriented patterns.[258][259] Consequently, car-centric planning engendered path dependencies, where urban forms adapted to accommodate automobiles amplified congestion and land consumption without proportionally enhancing efficiency. Empirical analyses link this sprawl to heightened car reliance, as dispersed land uses necessitate personal vehicles for routine travel, perpetuating cycles of infrastructure expansion—such as urban highways slicing through city fabrics—that undermine compact community structures. While enabling broader geographic access and economic integration for peripheral populations, these evolutions have imposed fiscal burdens on municipalities for road upkeep and induced environmental strains from impervious surfaces, though causal links to prosperity gains via mobility persist in observational data from high-motorization eras.[260][261]Health outcomes: benefits versus risks
Road traffic accidents cause approximately 1.19 million deaths annually worldwide, representing the leading cause of death for children and young adults aged 5-29, with an additional 20-50 million non-fatal injuries leading to disability.[262] [263] Vehicle emissions contribute substantially to ambient air pollution, which resulted in 4.2 million premature deaths in 2019, primarily from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, with road transport accounting for a dominant share of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in urban areas.[264] [265] In the United States, transportation-related emissions alone are linked to 20,000 to over 50,000 annual PM2.5-attributable deaths and additional ozone-related fatalities.[266] Prolonged car dependency promotes sedentary behavior, correlating with higher incidences of obesity, insufficient physical activity, and cardiovascular disease risk, as extended driving times are associated with elevated odds of smoking, short sleep duration, and metabolic disorders.[267] [268] Traffic noise pollution exacerbates these risks by inducing chronic stress, sleep fragmentation, and elevated blood pressure, contributing to increased rates of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and overall cardiovascular morbidity, particularly in densely populated areas.[269] [270] Conversely, personal car ownership enhances access to healthcare services, particularly in rural or underserved regions, where vehicle availability consistently predicts higher utilization of medical care even after adjusting for socioeconomic status, thereby mitigating delays in treatment for acute conditions.[271] [272] Cars facilitate rapid emergency transport, reducing mortality from time-sensitive events like heart attacks or trauma, and enable routine preventive care, exercise opportunities at distant facilities, and nutritional access via efficient food distribution, indirectly supporting lower disease burdens compared to pre-automotive eras reliant on slower alternatives.[273] [252] Empirical assessments indicate that improved mobility from vehicles correlates with better subjective well-being and life domain satisfaction, including health maintenance through expanded geographic reach for services.[273] While direct quantification of lives saved via automotive-enabled logistics remains challenging, the net health impact reflects a trade-off where mobility gains have historically outweighed localized risks in enabling advanced medical systems and reduced famine-related deaths.[271]Cultural and psychological influences
The automobile has profoundly shaped cultural norms, particularly in Western societies, where it emerged as a potent symbol of personal freedom and individualism following its mass adoption in the early 20th century. By enabling spontaneous travel without reliance on fixed schedules or public timetables, cars facilitated greater autonomy, allowing individuals to pursue leisure activities like road trips and family outings that reinforced self-reliant lifestyles.[274][275] This cultural association with liberation persists, as evidenced by surveys indicating that a majority of Americans view car ownership as essential to independence, contrasting with more collectivist transport systems elsewhere.[276] However, this narrative overlooks how automotive dependence has standardized suburban sprawl and reduced communal interactions, fostering isolation in car-centric environments.[277] Psychologically, cars serve as extensions of self-identity, often functioning as status symbols that signal achievement and social standing. Studies show that ownership of luxury vehicles correlates with heightened self-esteem and social signaling, driven by evolutionary drives for prestige, though this can exacerbate inequality perceptions in stratified societies.[278][279] In youth demographics, over 50% in regions like Germany perceive cars as prestige items, linking possession to maturity and peer validation.[280] Conversely, chronic exposure to driving stressors—such as congestion and perceived anonymity within vehicles—triggers elevated aggression, with road rage incidents tied to displaced anger, high life stress, and frustration-aggression dynamics.[281][282] Data from 2025 indicates that 17.4% of drivers attribute rage solely to external behaviors, yet underlying traits like trait anxiety amplify risks, contributing to poorer mental health outcomes including rumination and impaired decision-making.[283][284] Car dependency further imposes psychological burdens, particularly through enforced sedentariness and spatial isolation, which empirical models link to diminished life satisfaction beyond moderate usage thresholds.[285] For non-drivers, such as the elderly, cessation of driving elevates social isolation risks, correlating with depression via reduced access to networks.[286] While proponents argue automobility empowers self-reliance, causal analyses reveal it entrenches competitive individualism, potentially undermining cooperative social bonds in favor of solitary routines.[287][288] These influences, rooted in empirical patterns rather than idealized freedoms, highlight the automobile's dual role in enhancing agency while amplifying stress and disconnection.Industry Landscape
Key players and competitive structures
The automotive industry features an oligopolistic competitive structure dominated by multinational conglomerates that control over 70% of global light-duty vehicle production through economies of scale, vertical integration, and regional market strongholds. Toyota Motor Corporation led with 10.8 million vehicle sales in 2024, securing its position as the top global automaker for the fifth consecutive year, driven by strong demand for hybrid models in markets like North America and Asia.[289] Volkswagen Group ranked second with around 9 million units, leveraging its diverse brand portfolio including Audi, Porsche, and Skoda to maintain leadership in Europe.[290] Hyundai Motor Group, encompassing Hyundai and Kia, placed third with 7.2 million sales, benefiting from aggressive expansion in SUVs and electrification.[290] Other major players include General Motors with 6 million units, focusing on North American truck and SUV segments; Stellantis, formed by the 2021 merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA Group, achieving 5.4 million sales across brands like Jeep, Peugeot, and Citroën; and Ford Motor Company with 4.4 million, emphasizing commercial vehicles and F-Series trucks in the U.S.[290] Japanese firms Honda and Nissan, often allied through the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi partnership, compete via reliable sedans and crossovers, while Suzuki targets emerging markets with affordable compact cars.[290] Chinese manufacturers are disrupting the landscape, with BYD surpassing traditional leaders in electric vehicle sales, capturing significant share in China and exporting to Europe and Southeast Asia; BYD's 2024 global sales approached 3 million units, primarily battery-electric and plug-in hybrids.[291] Geely and SAIC further intensify competition through acquisitions like Volvo for Geely and joint ventures for technology transfer. Tesla, though outside the top volume producers, holds a pivotal role in premium EVs with over 1.8 million deliveries in 2024, pressuring incumbents on software integration and autonomous features.[291]| Rank | Automaker Group | 2024 Global Sales (millions) | Key Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toyota | 10.8 | Hybrids, reliability, Asia/North America dominance[289] |
| 2 | Volkswagen | ~9.0 | Brand diversity, Europe leadership[290] |
| 3 | Hyundai-Kia | 7.2 | SUVs, electrification push[290] |
| 4 | General Motors | 6.0 | Trucks/SUVs, U.S. market[290] |
| 5 | Stellantis | 5.4 | Mergers for scale, diverse brands[290] |