Boxer Rebellion
Boxer Rebellion
Main page
2306048

Boxer Rebellion

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Boxer Rebellion
Clockwise:
Date18 October 1899 – 7 September 1901
(1 year, 10 months and 20 days)
Location
North China, Yellow Sea
Result Eight-Nation Alliance victory
Belligerents


Qing dynasty Mutual Defence Pact of Southeast China (after 1900)
Commanders and leaders
Imperial government
Guangxu Emperor
Empress Dowager Cixi
Yuxian Executed
Commander-in-chief
Ronglu
Hushenying
Zaiyi
Tenacious Army
Nie Shicheng 
Resolute Army
Ma Yukun
Gansu Army
Dong Fuxiang
Strength
Seymour Expedition
2,100‍–‍2,188[1]
Gaselee Expedition
18,000[1]
China Relief Expedition
2,500[2]
Russian troops
58,000[3] to 100,000[4] or 200,000[5]
Boxers
100,000‍–‍300,000
Qing troops
100,000[6]
Casualties and losses
  • 32,000 Chinese Christians and 200 Western missionaries (northern China)[7]
  • 100,000 total deaths[8]
Boxer Rebellion
Chinese name
Traditional Chinese義和團運動
Simplified Chinese义和团运动
Literal meaningMilitia united in righteousness movement
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinYìhétuán yùndòng
Bopomofoㄧˋ ㄏㄜˊ ㄊㄨㄢˊ ㄩㄣˋ ㄉㄨㄥˋ
Wade–GilesI4-ho2-t'uan2 yün4-tung4
Tongyong PinyinYì-hé-tuán yùn-dòng
IPA[î.xɤ̌.tʰwǎn ŷn.tʊ̂ŋ]
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationYih-wòh-tyùhn wahn-duhng
JyutpingJi6 wo4 tyun4 wan6 dung6
IPA[ji˨ wɔ˩ tʰyn˩ wɐn˨ tʊŋ˨]
Manchu name
Manchu scriptᠴᡳᠣᠸᠠᠨ
ᠰᡝᡵᡝ
ᡝᡥᡝ
ᡥᡡᠯᡥᠠ ᡳ
ᡶᠠᠴᡠᡥᡡᠨ
Möllendorffciowan sere ehe hūlha i facuhūn

The Boxer Rebellion, also known as the Boxer Uprising, Boxer Movement, or Yihetuan Movement (traditional Chinese: 義和團運動; simplified Chinese: 义和团运動), was an anti-foreign and anti-Christian uprising in North China between 1899 and 1901, towards the end of the Qing dynasty, by the Society of Righteous and Harmonious Fists. Its members were known as the "Boxers" in English, owing to many of them practicing Chinese martial arts, which at the time were referred to as "Chinese boxing". It was defeated by the Eight-Nation Alliance of foreign powers.

Following the First Sino-Japanese War, villagers in North China feared the expansion of foreign spheres of influence and resented Christian missionaries who ignored local customs and used their power to protect their followers in court. In 1898, North China experienced natural disasters, including the Yellow River flooding and droughts, which Boxers blamed on foreign and Christian influence. Beginning in 1899, the movement spread across Shandong and the North China Plain, destroying foreign property such as railroads, and attacking or murdering Chinese Christians and missionaries. The events came to a head in June 1900, when Boxer fighters, convinced they were invulnerable to foreign weapons, converged on Beijing with the slogan "Support the Qing government and exterminate the foreigners".

Diplomats, missionaries, soldiers, and some Chinese Christians took refuge in the Legation Quarter, which the Boxers besieged. The Eight-Nation Alliance—comprising American, Austro-Hungarian, British, French, German, Italian, Japanese, and Russian troops—invaded China to lift the siege and on 17 June stormed the Dagu Fort at Tianjin. Empress Dowager Cixi, who had initially been hesitant, supported the Boxers and on 21 June issued an imperial decree that was a de facto declaration of war on the invading powers. Chinese officialdom was split between those supporting the Boxers and those favouring conciliation, led by Prince Qing. The supreme commander of the Chinese forces, the Manchu general Ronglu, later claimed he acted to protect the foreigners. Officials in the southern provinces ignored the imperial order to fight against foreigners.

The Eight-Nation Alliance, after initially being turned back by the Imperial Chinese military and Boxer militia, brought 20,000 armed troops to China. They defeated the Imperial Army in Tianjin and arrived in Beijing on 14 August, relieving the 55-day Siege of the International Legations. Plunder and looting of the capital and the surrounding countryside ensued, along with summary execution of those suspected of being Boxers in retribution. The Boxer Protocol of 7 September 1901 provided for the execution of government officials who had supported the Boxers, for foreign troops to be stationed in Beijing, and for 450 million taels of silver—more than the government's annual tax revenue—to be paid as indemnity over the course of the next 39 years to the eight invading nations. The Qing dynasty's handling of the Boxer Rebellion further weakened both their credibility and control over China, and led to the Late Qing reforms, and to a greater extent the Xinhai Revolution.

Background

[edit]

Origin of the Boxers

[edit]
Movement of Boxers and Alliance forces during the rebellion

The Righteous and Harmonious Fists arose in the inland sections of the northern coastal province of Shandong,[9] a region which had long been plagued by social unrest, religious sects, and martial societies. American Christian missionaries were probably the first people who referred to the well-trained, athletic young men as the "Boxers", because of the martial arts which they practised and the weapons training which they underwent. Their primary practice was a type of spiritual possession which involved the whirling of swords, violent prostrations, and incantations to deities.[10]

The opportunities to fight against Western encroachment were especially attractive to unemployed village men, many of whom were teenagers.[11] The tradition of possession and invulnerability went back several hundred years but took on special meaning against the powerful new weapons of the West.[12] The Boxers, armed with rifles and swords, claimed supernatural invulnerability against cannons, rifle shots, and knife attacks. The Boxer groups popularly claimed that millions of soldiers would descend out of heaven to assist them in purifying China of foreign oppression.[13] Members demonstrated their claimed invulnerability to new initiates by firing guns loaded with blank rounds at one another.[14]

In 1895, despite ambivalence toward their heterodox practices, Yuxian, a Manchu who was the then prefect of Cao Prefecture and would later become provincial governor, cooperated with the Big Swords Society, whose original purpose was to fight bandits.[15] The German Catholic missionaries of the Society of the Divine Word had built up their presence in the area, partially by taking in a significant portion of converts who were "in need of protection from the law".[15] On one occasion in 1895, a large bandit gang defeated by the Big Swords Society claimed to be Catholics to avoid prosecution. "The line between Christians and bandits became increasingly indistinct", remarks historian Paul Cohen.[15]

Some missionaries such as Georg Maria Stenz also used their privileges to intervene in lawsuits. The Big Swords responded by attacking Catholic properties and burning them.[15] As a result of diplomatic pressure in the capital, Yuxian executed several Big Sword leaders but did not punish anyone else. More martial secret societies started emerging after this.[15]

The early years saw a variety of village activities, not a broad movement with a united purpose. Martial folk-religious societies such as the Baguadao ('Eight Trigrams') prepared the way for the Boxers. Like the Red Boxing school or the Plum Flower tradition, the Boxers of Shandong were more concerned with traditional social and moral values, such as filial piety, than with foreign influences. One leader, Zhu Hongdeng (Red Lantern Zhu), started as a wandering healer, specialising in skin ulcers, and gained wide respect by refusing payment for his treatments.[16] Zhu claimed descent from Ming dynasty emperors, since his surname was the surname of the Ming imperial family. He announced that his goal was to "Revive the Qing and destroy the foreigners" (扶清滅洋 fu Qing mie yang).[17]

The enemy was seen as foreign influence. They decided the "primary devils" were the Christian missionaries while the "secondary devils" were the Chinese converts to Christianity, which both had either to repent, be driven out or killed.[18][19]

Causes

[edit]
A French political propaganda cartoon depicting China as a pie about to be carved up by Queen Victoria (United Kingdom), Kaiser Wilhelm II (Germany), Tsar Nicholas II (Russia), Marianne (France) and a samurai (Japan), while the Boxer leader Dong Fuxiang protests

The movement had multiple causes, both domestic and international. Escalating tensions caused Chinese to turn against "foreign devils" who engaged in the Scramble for China in the late 19th century.[20][page needed] The Western success at controlling China, growing anti-imperialist sentiment, and extreme weather conditions sparked the movement. A drought followed by floods in Shandong province in 1897–98 forced farmers to flee to cities and seek food.[21]

A major source of discontent in northern China was missionary activity. The Boxers opposed German missionaries in Shandong and in the German concession in Qingdao.[9] The Treaty of Tientsin and the Convention of Peking, signed in 1860 after the Second Opium War, had granted foreign missionaries the freedom to preach anywhere in China and to buy land on which to build churches.[22] There was strong public indignation over the dispossession of Chinese temples that were replaced by Catholic churches which were viewed as deliberately anti-feng shui.[23] A further cause of discontent among Chinese people were the destruction of Chinese burial sites to make way for German railroads and telegraph lines.[23] In response to Chinese protests against German railroads, Germans shot the protestors.[24]

Economic conditions in Shandong also contributed to rebellion.[25] Northern Shandong's economy focused significantly on cotton production and was hampered by the importation of foreign cotton.[25] Traffic along the Grand Canal was also decreasing, further eroding the economy.[25] The area had also experienced periods of drought and flood.[25]

A major precipitating incident was anger at the German Catholic Priest Georg Stenz, who had allegedly serially raped Chinese women in Juye County, Shandong.[23] In an attack known as the Juye Incident, Chinese rebels attempted to kill Stenz in his missionary quarters,[23] but failed to find him and killed two other missionaries. The German Navy's East Asia Squadron dispatched to occupy Jiaozhou Bay on the southern coast of the Shandong peninsula.[26]

In December 1897, Wilhelm declared his intent to seize territory in China, which triggered a "scramble for concessions" by which Britain, France, Russia and Japan also secured their own sphere of influence in China.[27] Germany gained exclusive control of developmental loans, mining, and railway ownership in Shandong province. Russia gained influence of all territory north of the Great Wall,[28] plus the previous tax exemption for trade in Mongolia and Xinjiang,[29] economic powers similar to Germany's over Fengtian, Jilin and Heilongjiang. France gained influence of Yunnan, most of Guangxi and Guangdong, Japan over Fujian. Britain gained influence of the whole Yangtze valley[30] (defined as all provinces adjoining the Yangtze, as well as Henan and Zhejiang[28]), parts of Guangdong and Guangxi provinces and part of Tibet.[31][non-primary source needed] Only Italy's request for Zhejiang was declined by the Chinese government.[30] These do not include the lease and concession territories where the foreign powers had full authority. The Russian government militarily occupied their zone, imposed their law and schools, seized mining and logging privileges, settled their citizens, and even established their municipal administration on several cities.[32]

In October 1898, a group of Boxers attacked the Christian community of Liyuantun village where a temple to the Jade Emperor had been converted into a Catholic church. Disputes had surrounded the church since 1869, when the temple had been granted to the Christian residents of the village. This incident marked the first time the Boxers used the slogan "Support the Qing, destroy the foreigners" (扶清滅洋; fu Qing mie yang) that later characterised them.[33]

The Boxers called themselves the "Militia United in Righteousness" for the first time in October 1899, at the Battle of Senluo Temple, a clash between Boxers and Qing government troops.[34] By using the word "Militia" rather than "Boxers", they distanced themselves from forbidden martial arts sects and tried to give their movement the legitimacy of a group that defended orthodoxy.[35]

Violence toward missionaries and Christians drew sharp responses from diplomats protecting their nationals, including Western seizure of harbors and forts and the moving in of troops in preparation for all-out war, as well as taking control of more land by force or by coerced long-term leases from the Qing.[36] In 1899, the French minister in Beijing helped the missionaries to obtain an edict granting official status to every order in the Roman Catholic hierarchy, enabling local priests to support their people in legal or family disputes and bypass the local officials. After the German government took over Shandong, many Chinese feared that the foreign missionaries and possibly all Christian activities were imperialist attempts at "carving the melon", i.e., to colonise China piece by piece.[37] A Chinese official expressed the animosity towards foreigners succinctly, "Take away your missionaries and your opium and you will be welcome."[38]

In 1899, the Boxer Rebellion developed into a mass movement.[9] The previous year, the Hundred Days' Reform, in which progressive Chinese reformers persuaded the Guangxu Emperor to engage in modernizing efforts, was suppressed by Empress Dowager Cixi and Yuan Shikai.[39] The Qing political elite struggled with the question of how to retain its power.[40] The Qing government came to view the Boxers as a means to help oppose foreign powers.[40] The national crisis was widely perceived as caused by "foreign aggression" inside,[41] even though afterwards a majority of Chinese were grateful for the actions of the alliance.[42][page needed] The Qing government was corrupt, common people often faced extortions from government officials and the government offered no protection from the violent actions of the Boxers.[42]

Qing forces

[edit]

The military of the Qing dynasty had been dealt a severe blow by the First Sino-Japanese War and this had prompted military reform that was still in its early stages when the Boxer rebellion occurred and they were expected to fight. The bulk of the fighting was conducted by the forces already around Zhili with troops from other provinces only arriving after the main fighting had ended.[43]

Estimates of Qing strength 1898–1900[43]
Army The Boards of

War/Revenue (field troops only)

Russian General

Staff (field troops only)

E.H. Parker

(Zhili alone)

The London Times

(Zhili alone)

Total 360,000 205,000 125,000–130,000 110,000–140,000

The failure of the Qing forces to withstand the Allied forces was not surprising given the limited time for reform and the fact that the best troops of China were not committed to the fight, remaining instead in Huguang and Shandong. The officer corps was particularly deficient; many lacked basic knowledge of strategy and tactics, and even those with training had not actively commanded troops in the field. In addition, the regular soldiers were noted for their poor marksmanship and inaccuracy, while cavalry was ill-organised and was not used to its full extent. Tactically, the Chinese still retained their belief in the superiority of defence, often withdrawing as soon as they were flanked, a tendency attributable to their lack of combat experience and training as well as a lack of initiative from commanders who would rather retreat than counterattack. However, accusations of cowardice were minimal; this was a marked improvement from the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, as Chinese troops did not flee en masse as before. If led by courageous officers, the troops would often fight to the death as occurred under Nie Shicheng and Ma Yukun.[44]

On the other hand, Chinese artillery was well-regarded, and caused far more casualties than the infantry at Tientsin, proving themselves superior to Allied artillery in counter-battery fire. The infantry, for their part, were commended for their good usage of cover and concealment in addition to their tenacity in resistance.[44]

The Boxers also targeted Jewish groups in the region destroying their reputation and leading to Britain temporarily vacating their civilian workers from the front lines. [citation needed]

Boxer War

[edit]

Intensifying crisis

[edit]
Chinese Muslim troops from Gansu, known as the Gansu Braves

In January 1900, with a majority of conservatives in the imperial court, Cixi changed her position on the Boxers and issued edicts in their defence, causing protests from foreign powers. Cixi urged provincial authorities to support the Boxers, although few did so.[45] In the spring of 1900, the Boxer movement spread rapidly north from Shandong into the countryside near Beijing. Boxers burned Christian churches, killed Chinese Christians and intimidated Chinese officials who stood in their way. American Minister Edwin H. Conger cabled Washington, "the whole country is swarming with hungry, discontented, hopeless idlers".[46]

On 30 May the diplomats, led by British Minister Claude Maxwell MacDonald, requested that foreign soldiers come to Beijing to defend the legations. The Chinese government reluctantly acquiesced, and the next day a multinational force of 435 navy troops from eight countries debarked from warships and travelled by train from the Taku Forts to Beijing. They set up defensive perimeters around their respective missions.[46]

On 5 June 1900, the railway line to Tianjin was cut by Boxers in the countryside, and Beijing was isolated. On 11 June, at Yongdingmen, the secretary of the Japanese legation, Sugiyama Akira, was attacked and killed by the forces of General Dong Fuxiang, who were guarding the southern part of the Beijing walled city.[47] Armed with Mauser rifles but wearing traditional uniforms,[48] Dong's troops had threatened the foreign legations in the fall of 1898 soon after arriving in Beijing,[49] so much that United States Marines had been called to Beijing to guard the legations.[50]

Wilhelm was so alarmed by the Chinese Muslim troops that he requested Ottoman caliph Abdul Hamid II to find a way to stop the Muslim troops from fighting.[citation needed] Abdul Hamid agreed to the Kaiser's request and sent Enver Pasha (not to be confused with the later Young Turk leader) to China in 1901, but the rebellion was over by that time.[51][52]

On 11 June, the first Boxer was seen in the Peking Legation Quarter. The German Minister Clemens von Ketteler and German soldiers captured a Boxer boy and inexplicably executed him.[53] In response, thousands of Boxers burst into the walled city of Beijing that afternoon and burned many of the Christian churches and cathedrals in the city, burning some victims alive.[54] American and British missionaries took refuge in the Methodist Mission, and an attack there was repulsed by US Marines. The soldiers at the British Embassy and German legations shot and killed several Boxers.[55] The Kansu Braves and Boxers, along with other Chinese, then attacked and killed Chinese Christians around the legations in revenge for foreign attacks on Chinese.[56]

Seymour Expedition

[edit]

As the situation grew more violent, the Eight Powers authorities at Dagu dispatched a second multinational force to Beijing on 10 June 1900. This force of 2,000 sailors and marines was under the command of Vice Admiral Edward Hobart Seymour, the largest contingent being British. The force moved by train from Dagu to Tianjin with the agreement of the Chinese government, but the railway had been severed between Tianjin and Beijing. Seymour resolved to continue forward by rail to the break and repair the railway, or progress on foot from there, if necessary, as it was only 120 km from Tianjin to Beijing. The court then replaced Prince Qing at the Zongli Yamen with Manchu Prince Duan, a member of the imperial Aisin Gioro clan (foreigners called him a "Blood Royal"), who was anti-foreigner and pro-Boxer. He soon ordered the Imperial army to attack the foreign forces. Confused by conflicting orders from Beijing, General Nie Shicheng let Seymour's army pass by in their trains.[57]

After leaving Tianjin, the force quickly reached Langfang, but the railway was destroyed there. Seymour's engineers tried to repair the line, but the force found itself surrounded, as the railway in both behind directions was destroyed. They were attacked from all sides by Chinese irregulars and imperial troops. Five thousand of Dong Fuxiang's Gansu Braves and an unknown number of Boxers won a costly but major victory over Seymour's troops at the Battle of Langfang on 18 June.[58][59] The Seymour force could not locate the Chinese artillery, which was raining shells upon their positions.[60][non-primary source needed] Chinese troops employed mining, engineering, flooding, and simultaneous attacks. The Chinese also employed pincer movements, ambushes, and sniping with some success.[61][non-primary source needed]

On 18 June, Seymour learned of attacks on the Legation Quarter in Beijing, and decided to continue advancing, this time along the Beihe River, toward Tongzhou, 25 km (16 mi) from Beijing. By 19 June, the force was halted by progressively stiffening resistance and started to retreat southward along the river with over 200 wounded. The force was now very low on food, ammunition, and medical supplies. They happened upon The Great Hsi-Ku Arsenal, a hidden Qing munitions cache of which the Eight Powers had had no knowledge until then.

There they dug in and awaited rescue. A Chinese servant slipped through the Boxer and Imperial lines, reached Tianjin, and informed the Eight Powers of Seymour's predicament. His force was surrounded by Imperial troops and Boxers, attacked nearly around the clock, and at the point of being overrun. The Eight Powers sent a relief column from Tianjin of 1,800 men (900 Russian troops from Port Arthur, 500 British seamen, and other assorted troops). On 25 June the relief column reached Seymour. The Seymour force destroyed the Arsenal: they spiked the captured field guns and set fire to any munitions that they could not take (an estimated £3 million worth). The Seymour force and the relief column marched back to Tientsin, unopposed, on 26 June. Seymour's casualties during the expedition were 62 killed and 228 wounded.[62]

Conflict within the Qing imperial court

[edit]

Meanwhile, in Beijing, on 16 June, Empress Dowager Cixi summoned the imperial court for a mass audience and addressed the choice between using the Boxers to evict the foreigners from the city, and seeking a diplomatic solution. In response to a high official who doubted the efficacy of the Boxers, Cixi replied that both sides of the debate at the imperial court realised that popular support for the Boxers in the countryside was almost universal and that suppression would be both difficult and unpopular, especially when foreign troops were on the march.[63][64]

Siege of the Beijing legations

[edit]
Locations of foreign diplomatic legations and front lines in Beijing during the siege

On 15 June, Qing imperial forces deployed electric naval mines in the Beihe River to prevent the Eight-Nation Alliance from sending ships to attack.[65][non-primary source needed] With a difficult military situation in Tianjin and a total breakdown of communications between Tianjin and Beijing, the allied nations took steps to reinforce their military presence significantly. On 17 June, Allied forces under Russian Admiral Yevgeni Alekseyev took the Dagu Forts commanding the approaches to Tianjin, and from there brought increasing numbers of troops on shore. When Cixi received an ultimatum that same day demanding that China surrender total control over all its military and financial affairs to foreigners,[66] she defiantly stated before the entire Grand Council, "Now they [the Powers] have started the aggression, and the extinction of our nation is imminent. If we just fold our arms and yield to them, I would have no face to see our ancestors after death. If we must perish, why don't we fight to the death?"[67] It was at this point that Cixi began to blockade the legations with the armies of the Peking Field Force, which began the siege. Cixi stated that "I have always been of the opinion, that the allied armies had been permitted to escape too easily in 1860. Only a united effort was then necessary to have given China the victory. Today, at last, the opportunity for revenge has come", and said that millions of Chinese would join the cause of fighting the foreigners since the Manchus had provided "great benefits" on China.[68] On receipt of the news of the attack on the Dagu Forts on 19 June, Empress Dowager Cixi immediately sent an order to the legations that the diplomats and other foreigners depart Beijing under escort of the Chinese army within 24 hours.[69]

The next morning, diplomats from the besieged legations met to discuss the Empress's offer. The majority quickly agreed that they could not trust the Chinese army. Fearing that they would be killed, they agreed to refuse the Empress's demand. The German Imperial Envoy, Baron Clemens von Ketteler, was infuriated with the actions of the Chinese army troops and determined to take his complaints to the royal court. Against the advice of the fellow foreigners, the baron left the legations with a single aide and a team of porters to carry his sedan chair. On his way to the palace, von Ketteler was killed on the streets of Beijing by a Manchu captain.[70] His aide managed to escape the attack and carried word of the baron's death back to the diplomatic compound. At this news, the other diplomats feared they also would be murdered if they left the legation quarter and they chose to continue to defy the Chinese order to depart Beijing. The legations were hurriedly fortified. Most of the foreign civilians, which included a large number of missionaries and businessmen, took refuge in the British legation, the largest of the diplomatic compounds.[71] Chinese Christians were primarily housed in the adjacent palace (Fu) of Prince Su, who was forced to abandon his property by the foreign soldiers.[72]

Representative Allied army and naval personnel

On 21 June, Cixi issued an imperial decree stating that hostilities had begun and ordering the regular Chinese army to join the Boxers in their attacks on the invading troops. This was a de facto declaration of war, but the Allies also made no formal declaration of war.[73] Regional governors in the south, who commanded substantial modernised armies, such as Li Hongzhang at Guangzhou, Yuan Shikai in Shandong, Zhang Zhidong[74] at Wuhan, and Liu Kunyi at Nanjing, formed the Mutual Defense Pact of the Southeastern Provinces.[75] They refused to recognise the imperial court's declaration of war, which they declared a luan-ming (illegitimate order) and withheld knowledge of it from the public in the south. Yuan Shikai used his own forces to suppress Boxers in Shandong, and Zhang entered into negotiations with the foreigners in Shanghai to keep his army out of the conflict. The neutrality of these provincial and regional governors left the majority of Chinese military forces out of the conflict.[76] The republican revolutionary Sun Yat-sen even took the opportunity to submit a proposal to Li Hongzhang to declare an independent democratic republic, although nothing came of the suggestion.[77]

The legations of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Austria-Hungary, Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands, the United States, Russia and Japan were located in the Beijing Legation Quarter south of the Forbidden City. The Chinese army and Boxer irregulars besieged the Legation Quarter from 20 June to 14 August 1900. A total of 473 foreign civilians, 409 soldiers, marines and sailors from eight countries, and about 3,000 Chinese Christians took refuge there.[78] Under the command of the British minister to China, Claude Maxwell MacDonald, the legation staff and military guards defended the compound with small arms, three machine guns, and one old muzzle-loaded cannon, which was nicknamed the International Gun because the barrel was British, the carriage Italian, the shells Russian and the crew American. Chinese Christians in the legations led the foreigners to the cannon and it proved important in the defence. Also under siege in Beijing was the Northern Cathedral (Beitang) of the Catholic Church. The cathedral was defended by 43 French and Italian soldiers, 33 Catholic foreign priests and nuns, and about 3,200 Chinese Catholics. The defenders suffered heavy casualties from lack of food and from mines which the Chinese exploded in tunnels dug beneath the compound.[79] The number of Chinese soldiers and Boxers besieging the Legation Quarter and the Beitang is unknown.[80] Zaiyi's bannermen in the Tiger and Divine Corps led attacks against the Catholic cathedral church.[81][non-primary source needed]

On 22 and 23 June, Chinese soldiers and Boxers set fire to areas north and west of the British Legation, using it as a "frightening tactic" to attack the defenders. The nearby Hanlin Academy, a complex of courtyards and buildings that housed "the quintessence of Chinese scholarship ... the oldest and richest library in the world", caught fire. Each side blamed the other for the destruction of the invaluable books it contained.[82]

1900, soldiers burned down the Temple, Shanhai Pass – The destruction of a Chinese temple on the bank of the Pei-Ho, by Amédée Forestier

After the failure to burn out the foreigners, the Chinese army adopted an anaconda-like strategy. The Chinese built barricades surrounding the Legation Quarter and advanced, brick by brick, on the foreign lines, forcing the foreign legation guards to retreat a few feet at a time. This tactic was especially used in the Fu, defended by Japanese and Italian sailors and soldiers, and inhabited by most of the Chinese Christians. Fusillades of bullets, artillery and firecrackers were directed against the Legations almost every night—but did little damage. Sniper fire took its toll among the foreign defenders. Despite their numerical advantage, the Chinese did not attempt a direct assault on the Legation Quarter although in the words of one of the besieged, "it would have been easy by a strong, swift movement on the part of the numerous Chinese troops to have annihilated the whole body of foreigners ... in an hour".[83][non-primary source needed] American missionary Francis Dunlap Gamewell and his crew of "fighting parsons" fortified the Legation Quarter,[84][non-primary source needed] but impressed Chinese Christians to do most of the physical labour of building defences.[85][non-primary source needed]

The Germans and the Americans occupied perhaps the most crucial of all defensive positions: the Tartar Wall. Holding the top of the 45 ft (14 m) tall and 40 ft (12 m) wide wall was vital. The German barricades faced east on top of the wall and 400 yd (370 m) west were the west-facing American positions. The Chinese advanced toward both positions by building barricades even closer. "The men all feel they are in a trap", said the US commander Capt. John Twiggs Myers, "and simply await the hour of execution".[86] On 30 June, the Chinese forced the Germans off the Wall, leaving the American Marines alone in its defence. In June 1900, one American described the scene of 20,000 Boxers storming the walls:[87][87]

Their yells were deafening, while the roar of gongs, drums, and horns sounded like thunder ... They waved their swords and stamped on the ground with their feet. They wore red turbans, sashes, and garters over blue cloth ... They were now only twenty yards from our gate. Three or four volleys from the Lebel rifles of our marines left more than fifty dead on the ground.

At the same time, a Chinese barricade was advanced to within a few feet of the American positions, and it became clear that the Americans had to abandon the wall or force the Chinese to retreat. At 2 am on 3 July 56 British, Russian and American marines and sailors, under the command of Myers, launched an assault against the Chinese barricade on the wall. The attack caught the Chinese sleeping, killed about 20 of them, and expelled the rest of them from the barricades.[88][non-primary source needed] The Chinese did not attempt to advance their positions on the Tartar Wall for the remainder of the siege.[89][non-primary source needed]

Sir Claude MacDonald said 13 July was the "most harassing day" of the siege.[90] The Japanese and Italians in the Fu were driven back to their last defence line. The Chinese detonated a mine beneath the French Legation pushing the French and Austrians out of most of the French Legation.[90] On 16 July, the most capable British officer was killed and the journalist George Ernest Morrison was wounded.[91] American Minister Edwin H. Conger established contact with the Chinese government and on 17 July, and an armistice was declared by the Chinese.[92][non-primary source needed]

Infighting among officials and commanders

[edit]
Boxer soldiers

General Ronglu concluded that it was futile to fight all of the powers simultaneously and declined to press home the siege.[93] Zaiyi wanted artillery for Dong's troops to destroy the legations. Ronglu blocked the transfer of artillery to Zaiyi and Dong, preventing them from attacking.[citation needed] Ronglu forced Dong Fuxiang and his troops to pull back from completing the siege and destroying the legations, thereby saving the foreigners and making diplomatic concessions.[94] Ronglu and Prince Qing sent food to the legations and used their bannermen to attack the Gansu Braves of Dong Fuxiang and the Boxers who were besieging the foreigners. They issued edicts ordering the foreigners to be protected, but the Gansu warriors ignored it, and fought against bannermen who tried to force them away from the legations. The Boxers also took commands from Dong Fuxiang.[95] Ronglu also deliberately hid an Imperial Decree from Nie Shicheng. The Decree ordered him to stop fighting the Boxers because of the foreign invasion, and also because the population was suffering. Due to Ronglu's actions, Nie continued to fight the Boxers and killed many of them even as the foreign troops were making their way into China. Ronglu also ordered Nie to protect foreigners and save the railway from the Boxers.[96] Because parts of the railway were saved under Ronglu's orders, the foreign invasion army was able to transport itself into China quickly. Nie committed thousands of troops against the Boxers instead of against the foreigners, but was already outnumbered by the Allies by 4,000 men. He was blamed for attacking the Boxers, and decided to sacrifice his life at Tietsin by walking into the range of Allied guns.[97]

Xu Jingcheng, who had served as the envoy to many of the same states under siege in the Legation Quarter, argued that "the evasion of extraterritorial rights and the killing of foreign diplomats are unprecedented in China and abroad".[98][page needed] Xu and five other officials urged Empress Dowager Cixi to order the repression of Boxers, the execution of their leaders, and a diplomatic settlement with foreign armies. The Empress Dowager was outraged, and sentenced Xu and the five others to death for "willfully and absurdly petitioning the imperial court" and "building subversive thought". They were executed on 28 July 1900 and their severed heads placed on display at Caishikou Execution Grounds in Beijing.[99]

Reflecting this vacillation, some Chinese soldiers were quite liberally firing at foreigners under siege from its very onset. Cixi did not personally order imperial troops to conduct a siege, and on the contrary had ordered them to protect the foreigners in the legations. Prince Duan led the Boxers to loot his enemies within the imperial court and the foreigners, although imperial authorities expelled Boxers after they were let into the city and went on a looting rampage against both the foreign and the Qing imperial forces. Older Boxers were sent outside Beijing to halt the approaching foreign armies, while younger men were absorbed into the Muslim Gansu army.[100]

With conflicting allegiances and priorities motivating the various forces inside Beijing, the situation in the city became increasingly confused. The foreign legations continued to be surrounded by both Qing imperial and Gansu forces. While Dong's Gansu army, now swollen by the addition of the Boxers, wished to press the siege, Ronglu's imperial forces seem to have largely attempted to follow Cixi's decree and protect the legations. However, to satisfy the conservatives in the imperial court, Ronglu's men also fired on the legations and let off firecrackers to give the impression that they, too, were attacking the foreigners. Inside the legations and out of communication with the outside world, the foreigners simply fired on any targets that presented themselves, including messengers from the imperial court, civilians and besiegers of all persuasions.[101] Dong Fuxiang was denied artillery held by Ronglu which stopped him from levelling the legations, and when he complained to Empress Dowager Cixi on 23 June, she dismissively said that "Your tail is becoming too heavy to wag." The Alliance discovered large amounts of unused Chinese Krupp guns and shells after the siege was lifted.[102]

Gaselee Expedition

[edit]

Foreign navies started building up their presence along the northern China coast from the end of April 1900. Several international forces were sent to the capital, with varying success, and the Chinese forces were ultimately defeated by the Alliance. Independently, the Netherlands dispatched three cruisers in July to protect its citizens in Shanghai.[103]

British Lieutenant-General Alfred Gaselee acted as the commanding officer of the Eight-Nation Alliance, which eventually numbered 55,000. Japanese forces, led by Fukushima Yasumasa and Yamaguchi Motomi and numbering over 20,840 men, made up the majority of the expeditionary force.[104] French forces in the campaign, led by general Henri-Nicolas Frey, consisted mostly of inexperienced Vietnamese and Cambodian conscripts from French Indochina.[105] The "First Chinese Regiment" (Weihaiwei Regiment) which was praised for its performance, consisted of Chinese collaborators serving in the British military.[106] Notable events included the seizure of the Dagu Forts commanding the approaches to Tianjin and the boarding and capture of four Chinese destroyers by British Commander Roger Keyes. Among the foreigners besieged in Tianjin was a young American mining engineer named Herbert Hoover, who would go on to become the 31st President of the United States.[107][108]

The international force captured Tianjin on 14 July. The international force suffered its heaviest casualties of the Boxer Rebellion in the Battle of Tientsin.[109] With Tianjin as a base, the international force marched from Tianjin to Beijing (about 120 km (75 mi)), with 20,000 allied troops. On 4 August, there were approximately 70,000 Qing imperial troops and anywhere from 50,000 to 100,000 Boxers along the way. The allies only encountered minor resistance, fighting battles at Beicang and Yangcun. At Yangcun, Russian general Nikolai Linevich led the 14th Infantry Regiment of the US and British troops in the assault. The weather was a major obstacle. Conditions were extremely humid with temperatures sometimes reaching 42 °C (108 °F). These high temperatures and insects plagued the Allies. Soldiers became dehydrated and horses died. Chinese villagers killed Allied troops who searched for wells.[110]

The heat killed Allied soldiers, who foamed at the mouth. The tactics along the way were gruesome on either side. Allied soldiers beheaded already dead Chinese corpses, bayoneted or beheaded live Chinese civilians, and raped Chinese girls and women.[111] Cossacks were reported to have killed Chinese civilians almost automatically and Japanese kicked a Chinese soldier to death.[112] The Chinese responded to the Alliance's atrocities with similar acts of violence and cruelty, especially towards captured Russians.[111] Lieutenant Smedley Butler saw the remains of two Japanese soldiers nailed to a wall, who had their tongues cut off and their eyes gouged.[113] Lieutenant Butler was wounded during the expedition in the leg and chest, later receiving the Brevet Medal in recognition for his actions.

The international force reached Beijing on 14 August. Following Beiyang army's defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War, the Chinese government had invested heavily in modernising the imperial army, which was equipped with modern Mauser repeater rifles and Krupp artillery. Three modernised divisions consisting of Manchu bannermen protected the Beijing Metropolitan region. Two of them were under the command of the anti-Boxer Prince Qing and Ronglu, while the anti-foreign Prince Duan commanded the ten-thousand-strong Hushenying, or "Tiger Spirit Division", which had joined the Gansu Braves and Boxers in attacking the foreigners. It was a Hushenying captain who had assassinated the German diplomat, Ketteler. The Tenacious Army under Nie Shicheng received Western style training under German and Russian officers in addition to their modernised weapons and uniforms. They effectively resisted the Alliance at the Battle of Tientsin before retreating and astounded the Alliance forces with the accuracy of their artillery during the siege of the Tianjin concessions (the artillery shells failed to explode upon impact due to corrupt manufacturing). The Gansu Braves under Dong Fuxiang, which some sources described as "ill disciplined", were armed with modern weapons but were not trained according to Western drill and wore traditional Chinese uniforms. They led the defeat of the Alliance at Langfang in the Seymour Expedition and were the most ferocious in besieging the Legations in Beijing. The British won the race among the international forces to be the first to reach the besieged Legation Quarter. The US was able to play a role due to the presence of US ships and troops stationed in Manila since the US conquest of the Philippines during the Spanish–American War and the subsequent Philippine–American War. The US military refers to this as the China Relief Expedition. United States Marines scaling the walls of Beijing is an iconic image of the Boxer Rebellion.[114]

The British Army reached the legation quarter on the afternoon of 14 August and relieved the Legation Quarter. The Beitang was relieved on 16 August, first by Japanese soldiers and then, officially, by the French.[115]

Qing court flight to Xi'an

[edit]

As the foreign armies reached Beijing, the Qing court fled to Xi'an, with Cixi disguised as a Buddhist nun.[116] The journey was made all the more arduous by the lack of preparation, but the Empress Dowager insisted this was not a retreat, rather a "tour of inspection". After weeks of travel, the party arrived in Xi'an, beyond protective mountain passes where the foreigners could not reach, deep in Chinese Muslim territory and protected by the Gansu Braves. The foreigners had no orders to pursue Cixi, so they decided to stay put.[117]

Russian invasion of Manchuria

[edit]
Russian officers in Manchuria

The Russian Empire and the Qing dynasty had maintained a long peace, starting with the Treaty of Nerchinsk in 1689, but Russian forces took advantage of Chinese defeats to impose the Aigun Treaty of 1858 and the Treaty of Peking of 1860 which ceded formerly Chinese territory in Manchuria to Russia, much of which is held by Russia to the present day (Primorye). The Russians aimed for control over the Amur River for navigation, and the all-weather ports of Dairen and Port Arthur in the Liaodong peninsula. The rise of Japan as an Asian power provoked Russia's anxiety, especially in light of expanding Japanese influence in Korea. Following Japan's victory in the First Sino-Japanese War of 1895, the Triple Intervention of Russia, Germany and France forced Japan to return the territory won in Liaodong, leading to a de facto Sino-Russian alliance.

Local Chinese in Manchuria were incensed at these Russian advances and began to harass Russians and Russian institutions, such as the Chinese Eastern Railway, which was guarded by Russian troops under Pavel Mishchenko. In June 1900, the Chinese bombarded the town of Blagoveshchensk on the Russian side of the Amur. The Russian government, at the insistence of war minister Aleksey Kuropatkin, used the pretext of Boxer activity to move some 200,000 troops led by Paul von Rennenkampf into the area to crush the Boxers. The Chinese used arson to destroy a bridge carrying a railway and a barracks on 27 July. The Boxer attacks on Chinese Eastern Railway and burned the Yantai mines.[118]

Massacre of missionaries and Chinese Christians

[edit]
Chinese martyrs of the Eastern Orthodox Church as depicted in an icon commissioned in 1990

A total of 136 Protestant missionaries, 53 children, 47 Catholic priests and nuns, 30,000 Chinese Catholics, 2,000 Chinese Protestants, and 200–400 of the 700 Russian Orthodox Christians in Beijing are estimated to have been killed during the uprising. The Protestant dead were collectively termed the China Martyrs of 1900.[119]

Orthodox, Protestant, and Catholic missionaries and their Chinese parishioners were massacred throughout northern China, some by Boxers and others by government troops and authorities. After the declaration of war on Western powers in June 1900, Yuxian, who had been named governor of Shanxi in March of that year, implemented a brutal anti-foreign and anti-Christian policy. On 9 July, reports circulated that he had executed forty-four foreigners (including women and children) from missionary families whom he had invited to the provincial capital Taiyuan under the promise to protect them.[120][121] Although the purported eyewitness accounts have recently been questioned as improbable, this event became a notorious symbol of Chinese anger, known as the Taiyuan massacre.[122]

The England-based Baptist Missionary Society opened its mission in Shanxi in 1877. In 1900, all its missionaries there were killed, along with all 120 converts.[123] By the summer's end, more foreigners and as many as 2,000 Chinese Christians had been put to death in the province. Journalist and historical writer Nat Brandt has called the massacre of Christians in Shanxi "the greatest single tragedy in the history of Christian evangelicalism".[124]

Some 222 Russian–Chinese martyrs, including Chi Sung as St. Metrophanes, were locally canonised as New Martyrs on 22 April 1902, after Archimandrite Innocent (Fugurovsky), head of the Russian Orthodox Mission in China, solicited the Most Holy Synod to perpetuate their memory. This was the first local canonisation for more than two centuries.[125]

Aftermath

[edit]

Allied occupation and atrocities

[edit]
The Russian Empire occupied Manchuria while the Eight Nation Alliance jointly occupied Zhili province. The rest of China outside of Manchuria and Zhili were unaffected due to the governor generals who participated in the Mutual Protection of Southeast China in 1900.

The Eight Nation Alliance occupied Zhili province while Russia occupied Manchuria, but the rest of China was not occupied due to the actions of several Han governors who formed the Mutual Protection of Southeast China that refused to obey the declaration of war and kept their armies and provinces out of the war. Zhang Zhidong told Everard Fraser, the Hankou-based British consul general, that he despised Manchus so that the Eight Nation Alliance would not occupy provinces under the Mutual Defense Pact.[126]

Beijing, Tianjin and Zhili province were occupied for more than one year by the international expeditionary force under the command of German Field Marshal Alfred von Waldersee, who had initially been appointed commander of the Eight-Nation Alliance during the rebellion but did not arrive in China until after most of the fighting had ended. The Americans and British paid General Yuan Shikai and his army (the Right Division) to help the Eight Nation Alliance suppress the Boxers. Yuan Shikai's forces killed tens of thousands of people in their anti-Boxer campaign in Zhili province and Shandong after the Alliance captured Beijing.[127] The majority of the hundreds of thousands of people living in inner Beijing during the Qing were Manchus and Mongol bannermen from the Eight Banners after they were moved there in 1644, when Han Chinese were expelled.[128][129] Sawara Tokusuke, a Japanese journalist, wrote in "Miscellaneous Notes about the Boxers" about the rapes of Manchu and Mongol banner girls. He alleged that soldiers of the Eight-Nation Alliance raped a large number of women in Peking, including all seven daughters of Viceroy Yulu of the Hitara clan. Likewise, a daughter and a wife of Mongol banner noble Chongqi of the Alute clan were allegedly gang-raped by soldiers of the Eight-Nation Alliance.[130] Chongqi killed himself on 26 August 1900, and some other relatives, including his son, Baochu, did likewise shortly afterward.[131]

During attacks on suspected Boxer areas from September 1900 to March 1901, European and American forces engaged in tactics which included public decapitations of Chinese with suspected Boxer sympathies, systematic looting, routine shooting of farm animals and crop destruction, destruction of religious buildings and public buildings, burning of religious texts, and widespread rape of Chinese women and girls.[132]

Contemporary British and American observers levelled their greatest criticism at German, Russian, and Japanese troops for their ruthlessness and willingness to execute Chinese of all ages and backgrounds, sometimes burning villages and killing their entire populations.[133] The German force arrived too late to take part in the fighting but undertook punitive expeditions to villages in the countryside. According to missionary Arthur Henderson Smith, in addition to burning and looting, Germans "cut off the heads of many Chinese within their jurisdiction, many of them for absolutely trivial offenses".[134] US Army Lieutenant C. D. Rhodes reported that German and French soldiers set fire to buildings where innocent peasants were sheltering and would shoot and bayonet peasants who fled the burning buildings.[135] According to Australian soldiers, Germans extorted ransom payments from villages in exchange for not torching their homes and crops.[135] British journalist George Lynch wrote that German and Italian soldiers engaged in a practice of raping Chinese women and girls before burning their villages.[136] According to Lynch, German soldiers would attempt to cover up these atrocities by throwing rape victims into wells as staged suicides.[136] Lynch said, "There are things that I must not write, and that may not be printed in England, which would seem to show that this Western civilisation of ours is merely a veneer over savagery".[137]

On 27 July, during departure ceremonies for the German relief force, Kaiser Wilhelm II included an impromptu but intemperate reference to the Hun invaders of continental Europe:

Should you encounter the enemy, he will be defeated! No quarter will be given! Prisoners will not be taken! Whoever falls into your hands is forfeited. Just as a thousand years ago the Huns under their King Attila made a name for themselves, one that even today makes them seem mighty in history and legend, may the name German be affirmed by you in such a way in China that no Chinese will ever again dare to look cross-eyed at a German.[138]

French troops observe the execution of a Boxer

One newspaper called the aftermath of the siege a "carnival of ancient loot", and others called it "an orgy of looting" by soldiers, civilians and missionaries. These characterisations called to mind the sacking of the Summer Palace in 1860.[139] Each nationality accused the others of being the worst looters. An American diplomat, Herbert G. Squiers, filled several railway carriages with loot and artefacts. The British Legation held loot auctions every afternoon and proclaimed, "Looting on the part of British troops was carried out in the most orderly manner." However, one British officer noted, "It is one of the unwritten laws of war that a city which does not surrender at the last and is taken by storm is looted." For the rest of 1900 and 1901, the British held loot auctions every day except Sunday in front of the main-gate to the British Legation. Many foreigners, including Claude Maxwell MacDonald and Lady Ethel MacDonald and George Ernest Morrison of The Times, were active bidders among the crowd. Many of these looted items ended up in Europe.[137] The Catholic Beitang or North Cathedral was a "salesroom for stolen property".[140] The American general Adna Chaffee banned looting by American soldiers, but the ban was ineffectual.[141] According to Chaffee, "it is safe to say that where one real Boxer has been killed, fifty harmless coolies or laborers, including not a few women and children, have been slain".[134]

A few Western missionaries took an active part in calling for retribution. To provide restitution to missionaries and Chinese Christian families whose property had been destroyed, William Scott Ament, a missionary of American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, guided American troops through villages to punish those he suspected of being Boxers and confiscate their property. When Mark Twain read of this expedition, he wrote a scathing essay, "To the Person Sitting in Darkness", that attacked the "Reverend bandits of the American Board", especially targeting Ament, one of the most respected missionaries in China.[142] The controversy was front-page news during much of 1901. Ament's counterpart on the distaff side was British missionary Georgina Smith, who presided over a neighbourhood in Beijing as judge and jury.[143]

While one historical account reported that Japanese troops were astonished by other Alliance troops raping civilians,[144] others noted that Japanese troops were "looting and burning without mercy", and that Chinese "women and girls by hundreds have committed suicide to escape a worse fate at the hands of Russian and Japanese brutes".[145] Roger Keyes, who commanded the British destroyer Fame and accompanied the Gaselee Expedition, noted that the Japanese had brought their own "regimental wives" (prostitutes) to the front to keep their soldiers from raping Chinese civilians.[146]

Execution of Boxers by standing strangulation

The Daily Telegraph journalist E. J. Dillon stated[where?] that he witnessed the mutilated corpses of Chinese women who were raped and killed by the Alliance troops. The French commander dismissed the rapes, attributing them to "gallantry of the French soldier".[where?] According to U.S. Captain Grote Hutcheson, French forces burned each village they encountered during a 99-mile march and planted the French flag in the ruins.[147]

Many bannermen supported the Boxers, and shared their anti-foreign sentiment.[148] Bannermen had been devastated in the First Sino-Japanese War in 1895 and Banner armies were destroyed while resisting the invasion. In the words of historian Pamela Crossley, their living conditions went "from desperate poverty to true misery".[149] When thousands of Manchus fled south from Aigun during the fighting in 1900, their cattle and horses were stolen by Russian Cossacks who then burned their villages and homes to ashes.[150] Manchu Banner armies were destroyed while resisting the invasion, many annihilated by Russians. Manchu Shoufu killed himself during the battle of Peking and the Manchu Lao She's father was killed by Western soldiers in the battle as the Manchu banner armies of the Center Division of the Guards Army, Tiger Spirit Division and Peking Field Force in the Metropolitan banners were slaughtered by the western soldiers. The Inner-city Legation Quarters and Catholic cathedral (Church of the Saviour, Beijing) were both attacked by Manchu bannermen. Manchu bannermen were slaughtered by the Eight Nation Alliance all over Manchuria and Beijing because most of the Manchu bannermen supported the Boxers.[80]The clan system of the Manchus in Aigun was obliterated by the despoliation of the area at the hands of the Russian invaders.[151] There were 1,266 households including 900 Daurs and 4,500 Manchus in Sixty-Four Villages East of the River and Blagoveshchensk until the Blagoveshchensk massacre and Sixty-Four Villages East of the River massacre committed by Russian Cossack soldiers.[152] Many Manchu villages were burned by Cossacks in the massacre according to Victor Zatsepine.[153]

Manchu royals, officials and officers like Yuxian, Qixiu, Zaixun, Prince Zhuang and Captain Enhai were executed or forced to commit suicide by the Eight Nation Alliance. Manchu official Gangyi's execution was demanded, but he had already died.[154] Japanese soldiers arrested Qixiu before he was executed.[155] Zaixun, Prince Zhuang was forced to commit suicide on 21 February 1901.[156][157] They executed Yuxian on 22 February 1901.[158][159] On 31 December 1900 German soldiers beheaded the Manchu captain Enhai for killing Clemens von Ketteler.[160][80]

Indemnity

[edit]

After the capture of Peking by the foreign armies, some of Cixi's advisers advocated that the war be carried on, arguing that China could have defeated the foreigners as it was disloyal and traitorous people within China who allowed Beijing and Tianjin to be captured by the Allies, and that the interior of China was impenetrable. They also recommended that Dong Fuxiang continue fighting. The Empress Dowager Cixi was practical however, and decided that the terms were generous enough for her to acquiesce when she was assured of her continued reign after the war and that China would not be forced to cede any territory.[161]

On 7 September 1901, the Qing imperial court agreed to sign the Boxer Protocol, also known as Peace Agreement between the Eight-Nation Alliance and China. The protocol ordered the execution of 10 high-ranking officials linked to the outbreak and other officials who were found guilty for the slaughter of foreigners in China. Alfons Mumm, Ernest Satow, and Komura Jutaro signed on behalf of Germany, Britain, and Japan, respectively.

China was fined war reparations of 450,000,000 taels of fine silver (approx.540,000,000 troy ounces (17,000 t)) for the loss that it caused. The reparation was to be paid by 1940, within 39 years, and would be 982,238,150 taels with interest (4 per cent per year) included. The existing tariff increased from 3.18 to 5 per cent, and formerly duty-free merchandise was newly taxed, to help meet these indemnity demands. The sum of reparations was estimated by the Chinese population size (roughly 450 million in 1900) at one tael per person. Chinese customs income and salt taxes guaranteed the reparation.[162] China paid 668,661,220 taels of silver from 1901 to 1939 – equivalent in 2010 to approx.US$61 billion on a purchasing-power-parity basis.[163]

A large portion of the reparations paid to the United States was diverted to pay for the education of Chinese students in US universities under the Boxer Indemnity Scholarship Program. To prepare the students chosen for this program, an institute was established to teach the English language and to serve as a preparatory school. When the first of these students returned to China, they undertook the teaching of subsequent students; from this institute was born Tsinghua University.

American troops during the Boxer Rebellion

The US China Inland Mission lost more members than any other missionary agency: 58 adults and 21 children were killed.[164][page needed][non-primary source needed] However, in 1901, when the allied nations were demanding compensation from the Chinese government, Hudson Taylor refused to accept payment for loss of property or life, to demonstrate the meekness and gentleness of Christ to the Chinese.[164][page needed][non-primary source needed]

The Belgian Catholic vicar apostolic of Ordos wanted foreign troops garrisoned in Inner Mongolia, but the Governor refused. Bermyn petitioned the Manchu Enming to send troops to Hetao where Prince Duan's Mongol troops and General Dong Fuxiang's Muslim troops allegedly threatened Catholics. It turned out that Bermyn had created the incident as a hoax.[165][166] Western Catholic missionaries forced Mongols to give up their land to Han Chinese Catholics as part of the Boxer indemnities according to Mongol historian Shirnut Sodbilig.[167] Mongols had participated in attacks against Catholic missions in the Boxer rebellion.[168]

The Qing government did not capitulate to all the foreign demands. The Manchu governor Yuxian was executed, but the imperial court refused to execute the Han Chinese General Dong Fuxiang, although he had also encouraged the killing of foreigners during the rebellion.[169] Empress Dowager Cixi intervened when the Alliance demanded him executed and Dong was only cashiered and sent back home.[170] Instead, Dong lived a life of luxury and power in "exile" in his home province of Gansu.[171] Upon Dong's death in 1908, all honours which had been stripped from him were restored and he was given a full military burial.[171] The indemnity was never fully paid and was lifted during World War II.[172]

Long-term consequences

[edit]
Foreign armies assemble inside the Forbidden City after capturing Beijing, 28 November 1900

The occupation of Beijing by foreign powers and the failure of the rebellion further eroded support for the Qing state. Support for reforms decreased, while support for revolution increased. In the ten years after the Boxer Rebellion, uprisings in China increased, particularly in the south. Support grew for the Tongmenghui, an alliance of anti-Qing groups which later became the Kuomintang.[172]

Cixi was returned to Beijing, the foreign powers believing that maintaining the Qing government was the best way to control China.[173] The Qing state made further efforts to reform. It abolished the imperial examinations in 1905 and sought to gradually introduce consultative assemblies.[174] Along with the formation of new military and police organisations, the reforms also simplified central bureaucracy and made a start at revamping taxation policies.[175] These efforts failed to maintain the Qing dynasty, which was overthrown in the 1911 Xinhai Revolution.[176]

In October 1900, Russia occupied the provinces of Manchuria,[177] a move that threatened Anglo-American hopes of maintaining the country's openness to commerce under the Open Door Policy.

French 1901 China expedition commemorative medal. Musée de la Légion d'Honneur

The historian Walter LaFeber has argued that President William McKinley's decision to send 5,000 American troops to quell the rebellion marks "the origins of modern presidential war powers":[178]

McKinley took a historic step in creating a new, 20th century presidential power. He dispatched the five thousand troops without consulting Congress, let alone obtaining a declaration of war, to fight the Boxers who were supported by the Chinese government ... Presidents had previously used such force against non-governmental groups that threatened U.S. interests and citizens. It was now used, however, against recognised governments, and without obeying the Constitution's provisions about who was to declare war.

Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., concurred and wrote:[179]

The intervention in China marked the start of a crucial shift in the presidential employment of armed force overseas. In the 19th century, military force committed without congressional authorisation had been typically used against nongovernmental organisations. Now it was beginning to be used against sovereign states, and, in the case of Theodore Roosevelt, with less consultation than ever.

Analysis of the Boxers

[edit]
Boxers captured by the US 6th Cavalry Regiment near Tianjin in 1901

From the beginning, views differed as to whether the Boxers were better seen as anti-imperialist, patriotic and proto-nationalist, or as backward, irrational, and futile opponents of what was inevitable change. The historian Joseph W. Esherick comments that "confusion about the Boxer Uprising is not simply a matter of popular misconceptions" since "there is no major incident in China's modern history on which the range of professional interpretation is as great".[180]

The Boxers drew condemnation from those who wanted to modernise China according to a Western model of civilisation. Sun Yat-sen, considered the founding father of modern China, at the time worked to overthrow the Qing but believed that government spread rumours that "caused confusion among the populace" and stirred up the Boxer Movement. He delivered "scathing criticism" of the Boxers' "anti-foreignism and obscurantism". Sun praised the Boxers for their "spirit of resistance" but called them "bandits". Students studying in Japan were ambivalent. Some stated that while the uprising originated from the ignorant and stubborn people, their beliefs were brave and righteous and could be transformed into a force for independence.[181] After the fall of the Qing dynasty in 1911, nationalistic Chinese became more sympathetic to the Boxers. In 1918, Sun praised their fighting spirit and said that the Boxers were courageous and fearless in fighting to the death against the Alliance armies, specifically the Battle of Yangcun.[182] Chinese liberals such as Hu Shih, who called on China to modernise, still condemned the Boxers for their irrationality and barbarity.[183] The leader of the New Culture Movement, Chen Duxiu, forgave the "barbarism of the Boxer ... given the crime foreigners committed in China", and contended that it was those "subservient to the foreigners" that truly "deserved our resentment".[184]

In other countries, views of the Boxers were complex and contentious. Mark Twain said that "the Boxer is a patriot. He loves his country better than he does the countries of other people. I wish him success."[185] The Russian writer Leo Tolstoy also praised the Boxers and accused Nicholas II of Russia and Wilhelm II of Germany of being chiefly responsible for the lootings, rapes, murders, and "Christian brutality" of the Russian and Western troops.[186] The Russian revolutionary Vladimir Lenin mocked the Russian government's claim that it was protecting Christian civilisation: "Poor Imperial Government! So Christianly unselfish, and yet so unjustly maligned! Several years ago it unselfishly seized Port Arthur, and now it is unselfishly seizing Manchuria; it has unselfishly flooded the frontier provinces of China with hordes of contractors, engineers, and officers, who, by their conduct, have roused to indignation even the Chinese, known for their docility."[187] The Russian newspaper Amurskii Krai criticised the killing of innocent civilians and charged that restraint would have been more becoming of a "civilized Christian nation", asking: "What shall we tell civilized people? We shall have to say to them: 'Do not consider us as brothers anymore. We are mean and terrible people; we have killed those who hid at our place, who sought our protection.'"[188] Lenin saw the Boxers as an avant-garde Proletarian force fighting against imperialism.[189]

Qing forces of Chinese soldiers in 1899–1901
Left: two infantrymen of the New Imperial Army. Front: drum major of the regular army. Seated on the trunk: field artilleryman. Right: Boxers

Some American churchmen spoke out in support of the Boxers. In 1912, the evangelist George F. Pentecost said that the Boxer uprising was a:

"patriotic movement to expel the 'foreign devils' – just that – the foreign devils". "Suppose", he said, "the great nations of Europe were to put their fleets together, came over here, seize Portland, move on down to Boston, then New York, then Philadelphia, and so on down the Atlantic Coast and around the Gulf of Galveston? Suppose they took possession of these port cities, drove our people into the hinterland, built great warehouses and factories, brought in a body of dissolute agents, and calmly notified our people that henceforward they would manage the commerce of the country? Would we not have a Boxer movement to drive those foreign European Christian devils out of our country?"[190]

The Indian Bengali Rabindranath Tagore attacked the European colonialists.[191] A number of Indian soldiers in the British Indian Army sympathised with the cause of the Boxers, and in 1994 the Indian military returned a bell looted by British soldiers in the Temple of Heaven to China.[192]

The events also left a longer impact. Historian Robert Bickers noted that the Boxer Rebellion served as an equivalent to the Indian Rebellion of 1857 for the British government, and agitated the Yellow Peril among the British public. He adds that later events like the Northern Expedition during the 1920s, and even the activities of the Red Guards during the 1960s, were perceived as standing in the shadow of the Boxers.[193]

History textbooks in Taiwan and Hong Kong often present the Boxer as irrational, but the central government textbooks in mainland China have described the Boxer movement as an anti-imperialist, patriotic peasant movement that failed by the lack of leadership from the modern working class—and the international army as an invading force. In recent decades, however, large-scale projects of village interviews and explorations of archival sources have led historians in China to take a more nuanced view. Some non-Chinese scholars, such as Joseph Esherick, have seen the movement as anti-imperialist, but others hold that the concept "nationalistic" is anachronistic because the Chinese nation had not been formed, and the Boxers were more concerned with regional issues. Paul Cohen's recent study includes a survey of "the Boxers as myth", which shows how their memory was used in changing ways in 20th-century China from the New Culture Movement to the Cultural Revolution.[194]

Boxers flags captured by the Americans

In recent years, the Boxer question has been debated in the People's Republic of China. In 1998, the critical scholar Wang Yi argued that the Boxers had features in common with the extremism of the Cultural Revolution. Both events had the external goal of "liquidating all harmful pests" and the domestic goal of "eliminating bad elements of all descriptions" and that the relation was rooted in "cultural obscurantism". Wang explained to his readers the changes in attitudes towards the Boxers from the condemnation of the May Fourth Movement to the approval expressed by Mao Zedong during the Cultural Revolution.[195] In 2006, Yuan Weishi, a professor of philosophy at Zhongshan University in Guangzhou, wrote that the Boxers by their "criminal actions brought unspeakable suffering to the nation and its people! These are all facts that everybody knows, and it is a national shame that the Chinese people cannot forget."[196] Yuan charged that history textbooks had been lacking in neutrality by presenting the Boxer Uprising as a "magnificent feat of patriotism" and not the view that most Boxer rebels were violent.[197] In response, some labelled Yuan Weishi a "traitor" (Hanjian).[198]

Terminology

[edit]

The name "Boxer Rebellion", concludes Joseph W. Esherick, a contemporary historian, is truly a "misnomer", for the Boxers "never rebelled against the Manchu rulers of China and their Qing dynasty" and the "most common Boxer slogan, throughout the history of the movement, was 'support the Qing, destroy the Foreign,' where 'foreign' clearly meant the foreign religion, Christianity, and its Chinese converts as much as the foreigners themselves". He adds that only after the movement was suppressed by the Allied Intervention did the foreign powers and influential Chinese officials both realise that the Qing would have to remain as the government of China to maintain order and collect taxes to pay the indemnity. Therefore, to save face for the Empress Dowager and the members of the imperial court, all argued that the Boxers were rebels and that the only support which the Boxers received from the imperial court came from a few Manchu princes. Esherick concludes that the origin of the term "rebellion" was "purely political and opportunistic", but it has had a remarkable staying power, particularly in popular accounts.[199]

On 6 June 1900, The Times of London used the term "rebellion" in quotation marks, presumably to indicate its view that the rising was actually instigated by Empress Dowager Cixi.[200] The historian Lanxin Xiang refers to the uprising as the "so called 'Boxer Rebellion'", and he also states that "while peasant rebellion was nothing new in Chinese history, a war against the world's most powerful states was."[201] Other recent Western works refer to the uprising as the "Boxer Movement", the "Boxer War" or the Yihetuan Movement, while Chinese studies refer to it as the "Yihetuan Movement" (义和团运动). In his discussion of the general and legal implications of the terminology involved, the German scholar Thoralf Klein notes that all of the terms, including the Chinese terms, are "posthumous interpretations of the conflict". He argues that each term, whether it be "uprising", "rebellion" or "movement" implies a different definition of the conflict. Even the term "Boxer War", which has frequently been used by scholars in the West, raises questions. Neither side made a formal declaration of war. The imperial edicts on June 21 said that hostilities had begun and directed the regular Chinese army to join the Boxers against the Allied armies. This was a de facto declaration of war. The Allied troops behaved like soldiers who were mounting a punitive expedition in colonial style, rather than soldiers who were waging a declared war with legal constraints. The Allies took advantage of the fact that China had not signed "The Laws and Customs of War on Land", a key document signed at the 1899 Hague Peace Conference. They argued that China had violated provisions that they themselves ignored.[73]

There is also a difference in terms referring to the combatants. The first reports which came from China in 1898 referred to the village activists as the "Yihequan", (Wade–Giles: I Ho Ch'uan). The earliest use of the term "Boxer" is contained in a letter which was written in Shandong in September 1899 by missionary Grace Newton. The context of the letter makes it clear that when it was written, "Boxer" was already a well-known term, probably coined by Arthur Henderson Smith or Henry Porter, two missionaries who were also residing in Shandong.[202] Smith wrote in his 1902 book that the name:[203]

I Ho Ch'üan ... literally denotes the "Fists" (Ch'üan) of Righteousness (or Public) (I) Harmony (Ho), in apparent allusion to the strength of the united force which was to be put forth. As the Chinese phrase "fists and feet" signifies boxing and wrestling, there appeared to be no more suitable term for the adherents of the sect than "Boxers", a designation first used by one or two missionary correspondents of foreign journals in China, and later universally accepted on account of the difficulty of coining a better one.

Media portrayal

[edit]
US Marines fight rebellious Boxers outside Beijing Legation Quarter, 1900 – copy of painting by Sergeant John Clymer
British and Japanese forces engage Boxers in battle

By 1900, many new forms of media had matured, including illustrated newspapers and magazines, postcards, broadsides, and advertisements, all of which presented images of the Boxers and the invading armies.[204] The rebellion was covered in the foreign illustrated press by artists and photographers. Paintings and prints were also published including Japanese woodblocks.[205] In the following decades, the Boxers were a constant subject of comment. A sampling includes:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Boxer Rebellion, known in China as the Yihetuan Movement (1899–1901), was a xenophobic uprising by Chinese peasants organized under the Society of Righteous and Harmonious Fists against foreign imperialists, Christian missionaries, and Chinese Christian converts, fueled by resentment over unequal treaties, economic exploitation, and perceived supernatural threats from Western influences amid Qing dynasty decline.[1][2] Originating in Shandong province where droughts and floods were blamed on foreign "demons," participants practiced ritualistic martial arts purportedly granting invulnerability to bullets, leading to widespread attacks on railroads, churches, and diplomatic enclaves.[1][3] The Qing court under Empress Dowager Cixi initially tolerated and later supported the Boxers, declaring war on foreign powers and besieging the international legations in Beijing for 55 days, resulting in hundreds of deaths among trapped foreigners and Chinese Christians.[4][5] An Eight-Nation Alliance—comprising Britain, the United States, Germany, France, Russia, Japan, Italy, and Austria-Hungary—deployed approximately 20,000 troops to relieve the siege, capture Beijing, and execute punitive reprisals, including the looting of the imperial palace.[2][6] The conflict concluded with the 1901 Boxer Protocol, which imposed a 450 million tael indemnity on China, legalized opium trade continuations, stationed foreign garrisons in the capital, and dismantled Qing sovereignty further, hastening the dynasty's collapse.[5][3]

Prelude and Causes

Socioeconomic Distress in Northern China

Northern China, encompassing provinces such as Shandong and Zhili, endured profound socioeconomic hardships in the late 1890s, rooted in environmental catastrophes and entrenched agrarian vulnerabilities. A severe drought persisting from 1898 to 1901 triggered widespread apprehension of famine, which ultimately struck in the spring of 1901, devastating rural communities already strained by subsistence farming.[7] In Shandong, this was preceded by a 1897-1898 sequence of drought followed by flooding, which uprooted farmers and prompted mass migrations to cities for food and employment.[8] These disasters amplified chronic issues, including soil exhaustion from intensive cultivation and inadequate irrigation infrastructure, rendering peasant households perpetually susceptible to crop failures.[9] Demographic pressures intensified the crisis, as population growth in northern China outstripped available arable land during the late Qing era, leading to subdivided plots too small to sustain families. This scarcity fueled indebtedness, with peasants often mortgaging land to landlords amid declining yields from overworked soils. Heavy exactions in taxes and corvée labor, coupled with inflationary erosion of silver-based earnings and corrupt local governance, plunged rural economies into stagnation, where even minor shortfalls precipitated destitution.[10] Shandong exemplified these woes, harboring an oversized populace dependent on cereal production across myriad under-resourced villages, where poverty metrics reflected acute malnutrition and homelessness. Social fallout included rising vagrancy, as displaced laborers swelled urban slums and itinerant groups, while banditry emerged as a survival mechanism in depopulated countrysides.[11] These interlocking distresses eroded traditional social fabrics, heightening desperation among the rural underclass and undermining faith in imperial relief mechanisms, which proved ineffective against the scale of affliction.[9]

Anti-Foreign Resentments and Unequal Treaties

The unequal treaties imposed on the Qing dynasty following military defeats in the Opium Wars fundamentally eroded Chinese sovereignty and fueled widespread anti-foreign sentiment. The First Opium War (1839–1842), triggered by Britain's efforts to enforce opium imports against Qing prohibitions, concluded with the Treaty of Nanjing on August 29, 1842, which required China to cede Hong Kong Island to Britain in perpetuity, open five treaty ports—Canton (Guangzhou), Amoy (Xiamen), Foochow (Fuzhou), Ningpo (Ningbo), and Shanghai—to foreign residence and trade, abolish the Canton trading monopoly, pay an indemnity of 21 million silver dollars, and grant extraterritoriality to British subjects, exempting them from Chinese law.[12][13] These provisions established a fixed 5% tariff on imports, far below protective levels, allowing British goods to flood Chinese markets and undermine local industries such as textiles.[14] The Second Opium War (1856–1860), involving Britain and France, expanded these impositions through the Treaty of Tianjin (1858) and the Convention of Peking (1860), which legalized the opium trade, opened ten additional ports including Tianjin, permitted foreign diplomats permanent residence in Beijing, allowed Christian missionary propagation, and extracted further indemnities totaling 16 million taels of silver from France and eight million from Britain.[15] Subsequent conflicts, such as the Sino-French War (1884–1885) and the First Sino-Japanese War (1894–1895), yielded additional treaties like the Treaty of Shimonoseki (1895), under which China ceded Taiwan and the Pescadores to Japan, paid 200 million taels in indemnity, and opened more ports, while foreign powers scrambled for spheres of influence in the 1890s—Britain dominating the Yangtze River valley, France southwestern provinces, Germany Shandong Peninsula, Russia Manchuria, and Japan seeking footholds in Fujian.[16] These arrangements granted extraterritorial rights to multiple nations, established foreign-controlled concessions in major cities, and permitted railroads and mining enterprises under foreign direction, effectively partitioning China economically without formal colonization.[17] Such treaties engendered profound resentments among the Chinese populace, particularly in northern provinces, where the economic burdens—indemnities equivalent to years of revenue and low tariffs exacerbating trade deficits—compounded famine and unemployment, attributing hardships to foreign exploitation.[14] Intellectuals and officials decried the "humiliation of the treaties" as a loss of the tributary system's dignity and Confucian hierarchy, viewing extraterritoriality as an affront to imperial authority and spheres of influence as preludes to dismemberment, sentiments echoed in reformist writings like those of Kang Youwei criticizing foreign "barbarian" encroachments.[18] Peasants, facing rural distress from imported goods displacing artisanal production, increasingly associated missionaries—who operated under treaty protections and converted locals, often gaining legal immunities—with cultural subversion, fostering xenophobic secret societies that portrayed foreigners as demons eroding traditional order.[19] By the late 1890s, these grievances coalesced into calls for resistance, as evidenced by uprisings against foreign railroads in Shandong, where local fears of ancestral grave desecration symbolized broader sovereignty threats.[20]

Missionary Expansion and Cultural Clashes

The influx of Christian missionaries into China accelerated after the Opium Wars, particularly following the Treaty of Tianjin in 1858, which granted Western powers the right to propagate Christianity freely and protect converts under extraterritorial jurisdiction. By 1900, approximately 1,500 foreign Protestant missionaries operated in China, with numbers rising rapidly from earlier decades; many were American, establishing stations focused on evangelism, education, and medical aid.[21] Catholic missions, rooted in earlier Jesuit efforts but expanded post-treaties, added several thousand clergy and lay workers, though Protestant growth was more pronounced in the Protestant heartlands of Shandong and northern provinces. These missionaries built churches, schools, and hospitals—such as those providing free treatment for prevalent diseases like opium addiction and infections—introducing Western medical practices that sometimes yielded tangible health improvements but were often tied to conversion efforts.[22] Cultural frictions arose from Christianity's core doctrines, which directly challenged entrenched Confucian principles of filial piety, social hierarchy, and harmony with ancestral spirits; converts typically rejected rituals like ancestor worship and idol veneration, leading to family schisms and community ostracism viewed as moral betrayal.[23] Missionaries' destruction of local shrines and refusal to accommodate traditional customs—such as feng shui practices or participation in imperial rites—reinforced perceptions of cultural arrogance, with Chinese elites decrying Christianity as a "barbarian" faith eroding societal order. Converts, numbering around 100,000 Protestants by the 1890s, gained legal protections under foreign consuls, exempting them from local taxes and disputes, which bred resentment among non-converts who saw this as favoritism enabling economic opportunism and undermining Qing authority.[24] These tensions manifested in sporadic violence, including attacks on mission compounds in Shandong during the 1890s, where villagers targeted missionaries and Chinese Christians as symbols of foreign intrusion amid droughts and floods that heightened economic desperation.[25] Missionaries' advocacy for converts in legal matters, leveraging treaty ports' privileges, further alienated officials who felt their sovereignty eroded, fueling narratives of missionaries as agents of subversion rather than mere spiritual guides. Such clashes, compounded by broader anti-foreign grievances from unequal treaties, primed northern rural populations for organized resistance, setting the stage for the Yihetuan's escalation.[23][26]

Rise of the Yihetuan Movement

Formation and Ideological Foundations

The Yihetuan movement, known to foreigners as the Boxers, formed in Shandong province during the late 1890s amid severe natural disasters including droughts and Yellow River flooding in 1898, which local peasants attributed to foreign and Christian influences disrupting traditional harmony.[27] Emerging from preexisting martial arts societies such as the Big Sword Society (Dadaohui), the group coalesced as decentralized bands of young rural males practicing "spirit boxing" rituals intended to confer invulnerability to bullets and blades through spirit possession and incantations.[28] These practices drew from syncretic folk religions blending elements of Buddhism, Taoism, and ancestral worship, with participants entering trance states to channel deities like the Jade Emperor or warrior gods.[1] Ideologically, the Yihetuan positioned themselves as defenders of Chinese sovereignty and cultural integrity against Western imperialism, adopting the slogan "Support the Qing, exterminate the foreigners" (fu Qing mie yang), which reflected loyalty to the Qing dynasty while targeting foreign diplomats, missionaries, and converts perceived as agents of cultural erosion and economic exploitation. Anti-Christian animus stemmed from resentment over missionary privileges under unequal treaties, which allowed converts exemptions from local taxes and customs, fostering perceptions of divided loyalties and supernatural curses brought by foreign religions.[5] The movement's proto-nationalist fervor emphasized restoring Confucian order and expelling barbarian influences, viewing technological and military inferiority not as inherent but as consequences of moral decay induced by foreign encroachments since the Opium Wars.[29] By early 1899, under loose leadership from figures like Cao Futian in western Shandong, the groups escalated from local vigilantism against Christians to organized attacks, gaining tacit provincial support from officials like Governor Yuxian who rebranded them as Yihetuan (Righteous Harmony Bands) to bolster anti-foreign militias.[30] This evolution underscored a causal chain from socioeconomic grievances—exacerbated by indemnity payments and sphere-of-influence concessions post-1894 Sino-Japanese War—to a millenarian ideology promising supernatural victory over modern weaponry, though empirical outcomes later disproved such claims during Allied interventions.[2]

Spread Through Shandong and Zhili Provinces

The Yihetuan movement, initially known as the Yihequan or "Righteous Harmonious Fists," emerged in the rural inland regions of Shandong province during 1898 amid severe socioeconomic pressures, including droughts and floods from 1897 to 1898 that displaced farmers and fueled resentment against perceived foreign and Christian influences blamed for natural calamities.[1] [31] These conditions were exacerbated by prior events such as the 1897 Juye Incident, where two German Catholic missionaries were killed, prompting foreign demands for concessions and heightened missionary activity that locals viewed as cultural intrusion.[1] In areas like Pingyuan County, figures such as Zhu Hongdeng mobilized peasant groups through martial arts rituals promising invulnerability, attracting unemployed youth and villagers who targeted Chinese Christian converts and church properties in scattered attacks numbering in the hundreds by late 1898.[32] Provincial authorities in Shandong shifted from suppression to accommodation under Governor Yuxian, who assumed office in late 1899 and reorganized Boxer bands into official militia units, renaming them Yihetuan to harness their anti-bandit activities against foreign-linked threats like railroads and missions.[33] [34] This policy, intended to bolster local order amid Qing weakness following the failed Hundred Days' Reform, instead amplified the movement's growth; by autumn 1899, Boxer groups had proliferated across western and northern Shandong, destroying foreign telegraph lines, railway segments, and over a dozen mission stations while killing dozens of Chinese Christians and several missionaries.[1] [33] Emboldened by this tolerance, Boxer detachments began migrating northward into adjacent Zhili province (modern Hebei) in late 1899, crossing into counties near Tianjin and Beijing during the winter, where they linked with local secret societies and escalated assaults on Christian villages and infrastructure.[34] [29] By spring 1900, amid ongoing drought, these bands had swelled to thousands, roaming Zhili's countryside and converging on the capital region, burning churches and executing converts in incidents that claimed hundreds of lives, setting the stage for urban unrest in May when groups reached Beijing's outskirts.[33] [1] This expansion reflected causal drivers of rural desperation and opportunistic provincial governance rather than centralized direction, though it strained Qing control as conservative court elements debated endorsement.[31]

Superstitious Practices and Invulnerability Claims

The Yihetuan, known to foreigners as Boxers, engaged in ritualistic practices rooted in folk martial arts and spirit mediumship, convinced that these conferred supernatural invulnerability to modern weaponry.[1] Participants underwent possession by deities through frenzied dances, incantations, and calisthenic exercises mimicking animal movements or sword whirling, which they believed transformed them into vessels for divine power.[31] These ceremonies often involved burning incense, reciting phrases drawn from Taoist esoterica, and ingesting herbal potions or talismans to invoke protection against bullets and blades.[35] Historical accounts from eyewitnesses describe hordes of Boxers performing such rites publicly, shouting invocations to "kill the foreign devils" while convinced of their immunity to gunfire.[36] Central to these beliefs was the notion of bi qiang-pao, warding off spears and gunpowder, achieved via spells and amulets that adherents claimed rendered them impervious to foreign arms.[37] Sect leaders propagated myths of warriors emerging unscathed from volleys, attributing survival to spirit possession that elevated fighters beyond mortal vulnerabilities.[38] Popular folklore reinforced this, drawing from longstanding Chinese traditions of magical invulnerability in martial sects, where esoteric rituals promised transcendence over physical harm.[39] Despite occasional survivals chalked up to miracles, empirical clashes later disproved these claims, as Boxers fell to rifle fire in battles like Senluo Temple in 1899, yet the convictions persisted among recruits due to confirmation bias in sporadic anecdotes and communal reinforcement.[28] These practices blended animistic possession with anti-foreign xenophobia, positioning the Yihetuan as righteous avengers under divine mandate, unmarred by rational skepticism prevalent in elite Confucian circles.[1] Adherents' faith in supernatural agency over causal mechanics of ballistics fueled reckless assaults, amplifying the movement's volatility amid socioeconomic unrest.[40]

Qing Government Engagement

Court Factions and Decision-Making

The Qing court during the Boxer Rebellion was divided between conservative factions advocating alliance with the Yihetuan (Boxers) to expel foreigners and moderate or regional officials prioritizing suppression or negotiation to avoid escalation.[5][29] The dominant conservative group, influenced by Empress Dowager Cixi and figures like Prince Duan (Zaiyi), viewed the Boxers as a potential tool to counter foreign encroachments and restore Qing authority amid growing anti-foreign sentiment.[41][5] Opposing them were pragmatic officials, including Viceroy Li Hongzhang and southern governors like Zhang Zhidong and Liu Kunyi, who recognized the Boxers' disorganized nature and the military superiority of foreign powers, opting instead to maintain order in the Yangzi River provinces and distance themselves from the court's radical shift.[29][41] Decision-making centered on Cixi's personal authority, as she effectively controlled the throne after the 1898 Hundred Days' Reform coup against Emperor Guangxu. Initially, from late 1899 to early 1900, the court ordered suppression of the Boxers, with governors like Yuan Shikai deploying troops to crush uprisings in Shandong and Zhili provinces, reflecting fears that the movement threatened dynastic stability.[5][42] This stance shifted decisively after the international Seymour Expedition's advance toward Beijing in June 1900 and the allied seizure of the Dagu Forts on June 17, which the court interpreted as a direct threat to sovereignty.[31] Cixi, resentful of foreign sympathy for Guangxu and emboldened by Boxer claims of invulnerability, convened urgent deliberations where conservatives argued for harnessing the movement's fervor against the legations.[41][5] On June 21, 1900, Cixi issued an imperial edict declaring war on the foreign powers, framing it as a unified national response while directing imperial troops to join Boxer assaults on Beijing's legations quarter.[31][5] This decision bypassed dissenting voices; for instance, Yuan Shikai refused to mobilize his forces northward, citing the Boxers' unreliability, while southern viceroys ignored the war declaration and negotiated truces with foreigners to protect their regions.[29][42] Appointees like Yuxian, a pro-Boxer governor in Shanxi, were elevated to implement the policy, executing missionaries and officials deemed pro-foreign, but such measures highlighted the court's internal fractures, as moderate factions withheld full cooperation.[5] The reliance on ritualistic Boxer militias over professional armies underscored causal miscalculations in Qing strategy, prioritizing ideological mobilization over empirical military assessment.[41] By August, as allied forces approached, Cixi fled to Xi'an with the court, later disavowing the Boxers in peace negotiations to mitigate defeat.[5]

Imperial Edicts Endorsing the Boxers

In January 1900, Empress Dowager Cixi issued imperial edicts defending the Yihetuan (Boxers), reversing the Qing court's prior policy of suppression and effectively lifting official bans on their activities in provinces like Zhili and Shandong.[31][43] These edicts portrayed the Boxers as patriotic militias combating foreign encroachment rather than mere bandits, prompting immediate protests from foreign diplomats who viewed them as incitement to violence against missionaries and legations.[44] The shift reflected Cixi's strategic calculation amid court debates, aiming to harness popular anti-foreign sentiment to bolster Qing legitimacy without fully committing regular troops initially.[34] As Boxer attacks on railroads, churches, and converts intensified in spring 1900, additional edicts from the imperial court tolerated and indirectly encouraged their expansion toward Beijing, including directives to provincial officials to coordinate with Boxer groups against perceived foreign threats.[30] By mid-June, with foreign naval forces gathering at Dagu forts and legation guards reinforcing Beijing, Cixi authorized edicts framing the Yihetuan as allies in national defense, urging them to unite with imperial armies while prohibiting attacks on Chinese Christians to maintain some facade of order.[31] The most explicit endorsement occurred on June 21, 1900, when the court promulgated the Imperial Decree of Declaration of War against eleven foreign powers—Britain, the United States, Germany, France, Russia, Japan, Italy, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Spain—explicitly invoking the "militia united in righteousness" (Yihetuan) to join Qing forces in expelling barbarians and avenging national humiliations.[44][31] Issued nominally in Emperor Guangxu's name but dictated by Cixi, the decree justified the alliance by citing foreign aggressions since the Opium Wars, while acknowledging prior failed attempts to restrain the Boxers, and ordered all officials and subjects to mobilize without exception.[43] This document transformed the Yihetuan from a semi-tolerated folk movement into de facto auxiliaries of the imperial army, contributing to the subsequent siege of the Beijing legations quarter starting June 20.[30] These edicts, disseminated via the Peking Gazette and provincial couriers, galvanized Boxer-Qing collaboration but exacerbated internal divisions, as reformist officials like Li Hongzhang in the south resisted implementation, highlighting the court's fragmented authority.[34] Foreign powers interpreted them as state sponsorship of rebellion, justifying the Eight-Nation Alliance's intervention, though the edicts' rhetorical nationalism masked Cixi's opportunistic pivot from suppression to support amid escalating crises.[44]

Internal Divisions Among Officials

The Qing court exhibited profound divisions between hardline anti-foreign factions advocating support for the Yihetuan (Boxers) and more pragmatic officials wary of escalating conflict with Western powers. Prince Duan (Zaiyi), a leading conservative Manchu noble and head of the Zongli Yamen after June 1900, aggressively promoted Boxer militancy, providing them military aid and integrating irregulars into court-aligned forces to counter foreign encroachments.[45] His influence persuaded Empress Dowager Cixi to issue edicts endorsing the Boxers by early June 1900, framing them as defenders against imperialism, though this masked underlying fears of dynastic collapse amid recent failures like the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895.[45] Countering this, officials like Ronglu, Cixi's longtime ally and commander of the Peking Field Force, adopted a more restrained approach despite nominal loyalty to the throne. Ronglu coordinated with Yuan Shikai, governor of Shandong Province, to prioritize suppression of Boxers in key areas while fortifying Beijing's defenses against allied advances, effectively undermining full commitment to the court's pro-Boxer pivot.[46] Yuan Shikai, commanding the modernized Beiyang Army, outright refused imperial orders to deploy against foreigners, instead quelling Boxer unrest in Shandong with over 20,000 troops by mid-1900 and aligning with southern viceroys to avert broader war.[6] These fissures extended to provincial leaders, culminating in the Mutual Protection of Southeast China pact formalized in June 1900 by figures including Li Hongzhang, viceroy of Liangguang. Li, a veteran diplomat who had negotiated post-Opium War treaties, rejected the court's June 21 declaration of war on eleven foreign powers, instructing subordinates to safeguard missionaries and trade concessions in southern ports like Canton and Shanghai, thereby isolating Beijing's belligerence and preserving regional stability.[47] This defiance, involving at least eight provinces, stemmed from recognition that Boxer reliance would invite devastating retaliation, as evidenced by the allies' naval blockades and the stalled Seymour Expedition in June 1900.[48] Such internal schisms weakened Qing coordination, with pro-Boxer edicts like the one on June 19 mobilizing irregulars numbering up to 100,000 around Beijing, yet failing to unify regular armies estimated at 50,000–70,000 nationwide. Ronglu's hesitance reportedly saved foreign legations by delaying assaults, while Yuan's forces numbered around 48,000 by July, focusing on internal pacification rather than alliance confrontation. Ultimately, these divisions facilitated the court's flight from Beijing on August 15, 1900, after allied relief forces breached the city.[45]

Outbreak of Hostilities

Initial Attacks on Railroads and Missions

The Yihetuan movement's initial hostilities manifested in targeted violence against Christian missions and foreign infrastructure in Shandong province during late 1899. Boxers, viewing missionaries as agents of cultural subversion and economic exploitation, assaulted mission stations, destroying churches and assaulting converts who were perceived as betraying traditional Chinese society. These attacks intensified following drought and famine, which Boxers exploited to rally peasants against symbols of Western influence.[1][28] A pivotal incident occurred in the last week of December 1899, when English missionary Sidney M. W. Brooks became the first Western victim killed by Boxers in Shandong, marking the transition from sporadic unrest to overt anti-foreign aggression. Brooks was murdered amid a mob attack on his mission, reflecting the Boxers' ritualistic claims of invulnerability and their fusion of martial exercises with anti-Christian fervor. Prior to this, throughout 1899, Boxers had demolished mission properties and killed dozens of Chinese Christians in rural Shandong, with estimates of over 200 converts slain by year's end.[49][50] As the movement spilled into Zhili province in spring 1900, attacks extended to railroads, which Boxers condemned as emblems of foreign domination and technological intrusion disrupting agrarian life. In western Shandong, Boxers targeted segments of the German-built Shantung Railway, ripping up tracks and assaulting construction guards to halt expansion linked to the Kiaochow leasehold. By early June 1900, this escalated northward; on June 1, Boxers attacked and killed two English missionaries, Robinson and Norman, at Yung-ch'ing-hsien, approximately 40 miles south of Beijing. Four days later, on June 5, Boxer bands severed the vital Peking-Tianjin railway line, demolishing bridges and tracks to isolate the capital from coastal reinforcements, an act that crippled telegraph communications and precipitated the Seymour Expedition's failure.[9] These assaults, numbering in the hundreds of incidents by mid-1900, claimed lives of at least 58 foreign missionaries and thousands of converts across northern China, while inflicting widespread damage on over 700 mission stations. Boxers justified the destruction through propaganda decrying railroads as "iron snakes" devouring the land, aligning with their broader xenophobic ideology that fused superstition, nationalism, and economic grievance. Local Qing officials often acquiesced or participated, viewing the chaos as a counterweight to foreign encroachments, though this tolerance later enabled the rebellion's escalation toward Beijing's legations.[51][27]

Seymour Expedition Debacle

The Seymour Expedition was a multinational relief effort launched by allied naval commanders on 10 June 1900 to rescue foreign diplomats and civilians besieged in Beijing's legations amid escalating Boxer attacks and Qing imperial ambivalence. Commanded by British Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hobart Seymour, the column comprised roughly 2,000 sailors and marines drawn from the United Kingdom, United States, Germany, France, Japan, Russia, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, including 112 Americans under Commander Bowman H. McCalla. The force departed Tianjin by train and on foot, aiming to exploit the Imperial Chinese Railway for a swift 120-kilometer advance, while rebuilding damaged track sections encountered en route. Initial progress was steady, with minor skirmishes against scattered Boxer irregulars, but resistance intensified as the column neared Langfang on 18 June, where coordinated attacks by Boxers and Qing provincial troops inflicted the first significant casualties. By 19 June, after reaching Fengtai south of Beijing, Seymour's command discovered that Chinese forces had systematically demolished the railway behind them, severing supply lines, water access, and reinforcements from Tianjin; ammunition and provisions dwindled rapidly amid summer heat and constant harassment. Lacking artillery sufficient for breaching fortified positions and facing numerically superior foes—estimated at several thousand combining Boxer militias and regular Kansu Army elements under Dong Fuxiang—the expedition abandoned its objective and initiated a fighting retreat on 20 June. Rearguard actions proved grueling, with ambushes at Yangcun and other points claiming lives amid disrupted communications and improvised logistics, such as commandeering local carts for the wounded. The column rejoined allied forces at Tianjin on 25 June after 16 days of combat, having penetrated only about 65 kilometers inland. Casualties totaled 62 killed and 232 wounded across the force, with Americans suffering 4 dead and 28 injured—the highest proportional losses among contingents due to their rearguard role; British losses numbered 27 killed and 97 wounded, Germans 12 killed and 62 wounded, and smaller tallies for others. The debacle exposed allied overconfidence in Chinese passivity, rooted in prior perceptions of Qing military weakness from the Opium Wars era, alongside tactical lapses like inadequate scouting and failure to post sufficient rail guards. Chinese irregulars and troops demonstrated unexpected tenacity, using the terrain for guerrilla tactics rather than open battle, which disrupted the linear advance dependent on vulnerable infrastructure. This operational failure, rather than any grand strategic design, compelled allies to consolidate at Tianjin and prepare a larger, better-supplied Gaselee Expedition, while highlighting the Boxers' disruption of modern transport as a causal factor in prolonging the Beijing siege.

Siege of the Beijing Legations Quarter

The siege began on June 20, 1900, after Boxer militants and Qing imperial troops overran outer defenses and isolated the foreign diplomatic quarter in central Beijing, trapping diplomats, civilians, missionaries, and their guards along with thousands of Chinese Christian converts seeking refuge.[52] [45] The attackers, numbering in the tens of thousands including irregular Boxer fighters wielding swords and spears alongside Qing soldiers with modern rifles and artillery, aimed to annihilate the foreigners amid escalating anti-Christian violence that had already claimed hundreds of missionary stations and converts across northern China.[53] Defenders totaled around 407 military personnel from eight nations—primarily Britain, the United States, Japan, Russia, France, Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary—augmented by about 473 civilians, though the core fighting force comprised roughly 409 marines, sailors, and soldiers who manned barricades across a 2-mile perimeter.[54] Under the command of British chargé d'affaires Sir Claude MacDonald, the defenders rapidly improvised fortifications using sandbags, wagons, and debris to seal off approaches, while pooling limited ammunition and establishing a hospital amid sweltering summer heat that exacerbated shortages of food, water, and medicine.[45] Qing artillery, including Krupp guns supplied by Germany in prior concessions, bombarded the compounds intermittently from June 21 onward, with notable barrages on July 13–14 that breached walls but were countered by rifle and machine-gun fire from elevated positions like the Tartar Wall, where U.S. Marines held key sectors.[55] Boxers, convinced of their ritual-induced invulnerability to bullets, launched fanatic frontal assaults—often at night or in human waves—but suffered heavy losses against repeating rifles and Maxim guns, exposing the limitations of their melee tactics against industrialized firepower.[53] Major assaults peaked in late June and early July, including a coordinated Qing mining operation under the British legation on June 24 that defenders flooded with sewage to thwart explosives, and repeated probes against the Japanese and French sectors where small detachments—Japan's 24-man guard under Captain Shiba Goro endured over 100% casualties from rotation—inflicted disproportionate defender losses.[45] On July 15, U.S. Marine Private Daniel Daly single-handedly repelled up to 200 attackers from a Tartar Wall outpost, using rifle fire to hold the line amid intense close-quarters fighting.[45] Inside the quarter, civilians endured shelling that killed 13 non-combatants and wounded others, while rationing reduced diets to mule meat and horseflesh by August; outside, Qing court vacillations—fueled by factional debates between hardline Boxer supporters and reformist officials—alternated between total war edicts and sporadic truce offers, none honored.[54] The 55-day ordeal ended on August 14, 1900, with defender casualties totaling 55 killed and 135 wounded, a toll borne unevenly by Japanese and French units exceeding 100% effective losses through reinforcements, while attackers incurred thousands of dead from failed charges and disease, underscoring the siege's asymmetry between determined irregular zeal and disciplined, equipped resistance.[52] [45] This standoff highlighted Qing military disorganization, as regular troops often looted alongside Boxers rather than coordinating effectively, and exposed the legations' vulnerability despite prior treaty protections, galvanizing international resolve for intervention.[53]

Allied Counteroffensive

Formation of the Eight-Nation Alliance

The Eight-Nation Alliance emerged as an ad hoc multinational military coalition in response to the intensifying Boxer attacks on foreign interests in northern China during late May and early June 1900. On May 31, 1900, following Boxer assaults on railways and missionary compounds near Tianjin, representatives from Britain, the United States, Germany, France, Russia, Japan, Italy, and Austria-Hungary coordinated initial joint naval and ground operations to secure the Dagu forts guarding access to Tianjin, capturing them on June 17 with combined forces totaling approximately 2,000 marines and sailors.[45] This action marked the first instance of unified command among the powers, driven by the urgent need to protect legations amid reports of escalating violence, including the murder of the German minister Clemens von Ketteler on June 20 and the onset of the Beijing legations siege that same day.[5] The failure of the subsequent Seymour Expedition—launched on June 10 from Tianjin with 2,122 troops drawn equally from the eight nations' naval contingents under British Admiral Edward Seymour—underscored the necessity for a more robust alliance. The column advanced only 40 kilometers inland before being halted by Chinese regular forces and Boxers, suffering 62 killed and 228 wounded while retreating to Tianjin by June 25 amid supply shortages and ambushes.[45] This debacle, coupled with the Qing court's declaration of war on the foreign powers on June 21, prompted diplomatic cables and agreements among the legation ministers and home governments to pool reinforcements without a single formal treaty, prioritizing rapid deployment over territorial disputes.[56] By early July, the powers had committed to a shared objective: relieving the besieged legations, dismantling Boxer militias, and punishing Qing complicity, with troop arrivals swelling the allied presence at Tianjin to over 20,000 by mid-July.[2]
NationApproximate Relief Force Contribution (to Beijing Expedition)
Japan7,000–8,000 troops, largest single contingent
Russia4,000–5,000 (additional forces operated separately in Manchuria)
United Kingdom2,000 British + 3,000 Indian sepoys
France1,000–2,000
United States500–1,000 (9th Infantry and Marines)
Germany500–1,000
Italy200–300
Austria-Hungary100–200
The alliance's operational formation crystallized during the July 1900 assault on Tianjin, where joint commands under British Major-General Alfred Gaselee and Japanese General Yamaguchi Motomi overcame internal frictions—such as Russian reluctance to share intelligence—to capture the city on July 14 after heavy street fighting that killed over 2,500 Chinese defenders.[45] Command authority remained decentralized, with national contingents retaining autonomy, reflecting pragmatic necessity rather than unified doctrine; for instance, the U.S. emphasized non-colonial aims per Secretary of State John Hay's Open Door notes, while European powers eyed punitive indemnities.[5] This loose structure enabled the Gaselee Expedition's departure from Tianjin on August 4, culminating in Beijing's relief on August 14, but sowed seeds for later disputes over occupation zones and reparations.[56]

Gaselee Expedition and Relief of Beijing

Following the failure of the initial Seymour Expedition in late June 1900, which attempted to reach Beijing via rail but was repelled by Chinese forces and withdrew after sustaining casualties, an international relief force assembled at Tianjin under the command of British Lieutenant-General Alfred Gaselee.[45] This multinational column, comprising approximately 18,000 to 20,000 troops from the Eight-Nation Alliance, departed Tianjin on August 4, 1900, advancing along the Hai River toward Beijing to break the 55-day siege of the foreign legations that had begun on June 20.[53][57] The force included about 8,000 Japanese troops, 4,000 to 4,800 Russians, 3,000 British (largely Indian units), 2,000 to 2,500 Americans, and smaller contingents of around 500 to 800 French, with minimal contributions from Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy.[2][45] The expedition encountered organized resistance from Qing imperial troops and Boxers at Beicang on August 5, where Japanese-led assaults supported by American units forced a Chinese retreat, and at Yangcun on August 6, involving fierce fighting by American and British forces amid challenging heat that caused significant non-combat losses from exhaustion.[57][45] Allied casualties during the march were relatively light, with the primary threats being environmental factors rather than sustained enemy opposition, as Qing defenses fragmented under the pressure of the converging alliance armies.[53] By August 14, elements of the force reached Beijing's outer defenses; U.S. troops from the 14th Infantry scaled the Tartar Wall and raised the first foreign flag, while British units exploited a less fortified southeastern route to enter the legation quarter first, confirming the besieged diplomats and civilians—around 3,500 foreigners and Chinese Christians—had endured the siege with over 200 defender deaths but held firm.[57][2] On August 15, further advances cleared remaining barricades and the inner city, with U.S. artillery breaching gates, prompting the Qing empress dowager and court to flee westward to Xi'an, effectively collapsing organized resistance in the capital.[53][57] The relief succeeded due to the alliance's numerical superiority and coordinated pressure, though inter-allied frictions over command—Gaselee acting temporarily before German Field Marshal Waldersee's arrival—highlighted tensions among the powers.[45] This operation marked the turning point in suppressing the Boxer uprising in northern China, enabling subsequent occupation and negotiations.[2]

Capture of the Imperial City and Qing Flight

Following the relief of the besieged legations quarter on August 14, 1900, elements of the Eight-Nation Alliance continued their advance against remaining Qing and Boxer positions in Beijing. American forces, including U.S. Marines under Colonel Littleton W. T. Waller, spearheaded the assault on the Imperial City the next day, clearing barricades along the Tartar Wall and employing artillery fire from Zhengyangmen Gate to suppress defenders.[45] This action resulted in the capture of key defensive points, with Captain Henry J. Reilly among the American officers killed in the fighting.[45] The multinational relief force totaled approximately 19,000 troops, dominated by Japanese (8,000), Russian (4,800), British (3,000), American (2,100), and French (500) contingents, which overwhelmed disorganized Chinese resistance through coordinated assaults on the city's inner fortifications.[45] By August 15, allied units had breached the defenses of the Forbidden City, though full entry was delayed pending a war council decision to avoid immediate occupation risks.[45] [6] In the early morning hours of August 15, prior to the completion of these captures, the Qing imperial court under Empress Dowager Cixi evacuated Beijing, with Cixi, Emperor Guangxu, and key officials disguising themselves as peasants to avoid detection by advancing allies.[45] The entourage, numbering several hundred including eunuchs and guards, fled westward along rudimentary routes, eventually reaching Xi'an in Shaanxi province by late October 1900 after a grueling overland journey marked by hardships and reliance on local support.[45] This flight left the capital abandoned to foreign occupation, shifting Qing authority to temporary relocation while negotiations loomed.[45] On August 16, 1900, allied forces formally entered the vacated Forbidden City, securing the imperial precincts without significant opposition.[45] The rapid collapse of central defenses underscored the Qing military's inability to sustain prolonged urban combat against technologically superior invaders, facilitated by internal disarray and the court's precipitate departure.[45]

Peripheral Conflicts

Russian Invasion of Manchuria

In July 1900, Boxer insurgents and elements of the Qing army launched attacks on the Russian-operated Chinese Eastern Railway (CER) in Manchuria, disrupting transport and threatening Russian settlers and infrastructure along the line. Russia, citing the need to protect its economic interests and personnel, mobilized forces from the Amur Military District and Siberia, escalating from defensive reinforcements to a full-scale invasion across the Amur River.[58][59] Russian commanders, including General Mikhail Linevich and Admiral Yevgeni Alekseyev, directed operations with detachments totaling around 56,000 troops in the Amur region, supplemented by additional reinforcements bringing estimates to 100,000 overall. These forces, organized into columns such as Colonel Pavel Rennenkampf's Tsitsihar group of approximately 5,000 men with 20 guns, advanced methodically against Qing bannermen and Boxer militias, who numbered in the thousands but lacked modern artillery cohesion. Early clashes included the capture of 10 guns at Bayan-Tun on July 11 and the defeat of 4,000 Chinese troops with 22 guns seized at Sian Sin on July 15.[58][60] Further advances secured the Amur River crossings by late July, with victories at Aihun on July 22—where a large Chinese force was routed—and Little Khingan on August 2. By early September, Russian columns occupied key centers: Kirin on September 10, followed by Niu Chzhuang, Aigun, and Mukden between September 11 and 17. These operations reclaimed the CER and pacified northern and central Manchuria by September 20, with minimal Russian casualties reported due to superior firepower and logistics.[58] The invasion effectively neutralized Boxer activity in the region but extended Russian military presence beyond the rebellion's resolution, with occupation forces remaining until 1905 amid diplomatic pressures from Japan and the international community. This expansion fueled Russo-Japanese tensions, contributing to the 1904–1905 war, as Russia's actions prioritized territorial consolidation over mere suppression of unrest.[61]

Massacres of Missionaries and Converts

The Boxer Rebellion saw extensive anti-Christian violence extending beyond the primary conflict zones of Beijing and Tianjin into northern provinces such as Shanxi, Hebei, and Shandong, where local Boxer militias and mobs targeted missionaries and converts. This peripheral unrest, often abetted by provincial officials sympathetic to the movement, involved the destruction of churches, looting of Christian villages, and summary executions, driven by accusations of foreign collusion and supernatural invulnerability claims by attackers.[33][3] In Shanxi province, Governor Yuxian, who endorsed Boxer activities, oversaw some of the most systematic killings; on July 9, 1900, during the Taiyuan Massacre, 44 foreign missionaries—including women and children from Protestant and Catholic missions—were beheaded on official orders, with their heads displayed publicly. Similar provincial massacres included the execution of 15 missionaries in Baoding (Hebei) on June 30–July 1, 1900, and the slaughter of 71 Chinese Christians in Shouyang (Shanxi) around the same period, where converts were tortured and killed for refusing to apostatize. In Shandong, the violence began earlier, with the killing of British missionary Sidney Brooks on December 31, 1899, marking the first foreign death attributed to Boxers.[3][62][63] Overall, the uprising resulted in the deaths of approximately 200–250 foreign missionaries and an estimated 20,000–32,000 Chinese Christian converts nationwide, with Shanxi alone accounting for over 150 Protestant missionaries slain and thousands of local believers massacred in targeted villages. These figures derive from missionary society records and contemporary diplomatic reports, though exact counts vary due to chaotic documentation amid widespread rural pogroms. The violence disproportionately affected Protestant and Catholic communities, exacerbating ethnic and religious tensions in regions distant from allied military relief efforts.[33][64][65]

Atrocities and Reprisals

Boxer Violence Against Foreigners and Christians

The Society of Righteous and Harmonious Fists, known as the Boxers, initiated violent campaigns against foreigners and Chinese Christian converts in northern China from late 1899, escalating into mass killings and destruction by spring 1900.[33] Motivated by xenophobia and opposition to Western influence, including missionary activities perceived as cultural erosion, Boxers targeted mission stations, churches, and communities harboring Christians.[1] These attacks often involved arson, torture, and execution, with victims compelled to renounce their faith or face death.[63] In rural areas of Shandong and Shanxi provinces, Boxers conducted systematic pogroms against Christian villages. On June 9, 1900, in Shouyang, Shanxi, they massacred 71 Chinese Christians, employing brutal methods such as beheading, burning alive, and dismemberment of families.[63] Similar atrocities occurred in Taiyuan on July 9, where Governor Yuxian oversaw the execution of 44 foreign missionaries, including women and children from the China Inland Mission, by beheading after forced renunciation attempts.[66] In Datong, on July 12, Boxers killed 12 foreigners—two men, five women, and five children—along with five Chinese Christians.[66] At Taiku, six missionaries and eight children suffered the same fate shortly thereafter.[66] Urban violence mirrored rural ferocity, with Boxers assaulting foreign concessions and legations prior to major sieges. In Tianjin, mid-June 1900 saw escalated attacks, including the murder of Chinese Christians, torching of foreign shops, churches, and residences, displacing thousands.[45] On June 20, 1900, in Beijing, Boxers and imperial troops killed German diplomat Clemens von Ketteler and Japanese legation chancellor Sugiyama Akira, incidents that precipitated the siege of the legations quarter.[53] These pre-siege killings underscored the Boxers' direct assaults on diplomatic personnel, often with Qing complicity or inaction.[2] Overall casualties from Boxer violence were substantial, with estimates of 200 to 225 foreign missionaries slain, predominantly Protestant, alongside 30,000 to 50,000 Chinese Christian converts in northern China.[62] [67] Catholic victims numbered around 120 missionaries and 87 lay Chinese, per Vatican records.[68] The China Inland Mission alone reported hundreds of its members and dependents killed, reflecting the disproportionate impact on evangelical groups active in inland regions.[69] Destruction extended to over 700 Catholic churches and thousands of Protestant chapels razed or vandalized, eradicating physical symbols of Christianity.[3] These acts, while rooted in popular resentment against unequal treaties and missionary privileges, resulted in indiscriminate civilian targeting beyond military objectives.[70]

Allied Punitive Actions and Looting

![Alfred von Waldersee in China][float-right] Following the capture of Beijing on August 14, 1900, allied forces from the Eight-Nation Alliance immediately occupied the imperial palaces and conducted widespread looting of the city, targeting the Forbidden City, royal residences, and private homes. Troops seized valuable artifacts, artworks, and treasures, with proceeds from auctions funding national collections or personal gains; for instance, British regulations directed looted items to the Crown, while unregulated plundering occurred among other contingents.[45][71][72] American commander Adna Chaffee explicitly prohibited U.S. soldiers from participating in looting, though enforcement proved challenging amid the chaos.[45] In the ensuing months, punitive expeditions extended beyond Beijing to suppress Boxer remnants in surrounding provinces, involving arson, village burnings, and summary executions of suspected insurgents. German Field Marshal Alfred von Waldersee, appointed overall commander in September 1900, coordinated multi-national columns—such as those departing from Shanhaiguan—that razed Boxer strongholds and encountered resistance, resulting in further allied reprisals.[73][74] These operations, approved by British authorities among others, targeted areas harboring rebels, leading to mass killings and destruction justified as necessary to eradicate the uprising's support base.[74][19] National differences marked the conduct of these actions: German and Russian forces pursued harsher measures, including no-quarter policies, while U.S. and British troops emphasized restraint, though atrocities like rape and arbitrary executions occurred across contingents in occupied zones such as Tianjin.[75][76] Looting persisted during these raids, dispersing cultural heritage—over a hundred imperial artworks from sites like the Winter Palace entered international markets post-1901.[77] Such reprisals, while stemming from retaliation against Boxer violence, inflicted significant civilian hardship and fueled long-term resentment toward foreign intervention.

Resolution and Protocols

Negotiations Leading to the Boxer Protocol

Following the capture of Beijing by allied forces on August 14, 1900, and the subsequent flight of Empress Dowager Cixi and the Qing court to Xi'an in October 1900, the Eight-Nation Alliance pursued formal peace talks to extract concessions from the weakened Qing government.[45] On December 22, 1900, the powers delivered a joint note to the Xi'an court, outlining core demands including the execution or degradation of Qing officials who had endorsed the Boxers, payment of indemnities to cover allied military costs and civilian losses estimated in the hundreds of millions of taels, establishment of a permanent foreign guard for the Beijing legations extending to the sea, demolition of the Taku Forts, a two-year ban on Chinese arms imports, and erection of expiatory monuments at desecrated foreign cemeteries.[3] These terms reflected the allies' intent to punish the Qing for complicity in the uprising while securing long-term protections for foreign interests, though initial proposals circulated among the powers had included more extreme measures like territorial cessions that were later withdrawn to facilitate agreement.[45] The Qing court responded by appointing Prince Qing (Yikuang) and Li Hongzhang as chief negotiators, leveraging Li's experience from prior treaties such as Shimonoseki in 1895 despite his regional non-involvement in the northern unrest.[78] Li, who had remained in southern China opposing the Boxers, first engaged in preliminary talks under Russian escort in October 1900 before traveling north and arriving in Beijing by spring 1901 to lead substantive discussions.[79] Negotiations, spanning over nine months, involved shuttle diplomacy between Beijing envoys and the Xi'an court, with Chinese counterproposals seeking reductions in indemnity amounts and punishments to preserve dynastic legitimacy. Allied plenipotentiaries, representing the eight core powers plus Belgium, the Netherlands, and Spain, debated internally; the United States prioritized preserving commercial access under the Open Door without annexations, countering Russian aims in Manchuria and German calls for harsher reprisals.[80] Tensions arose from allied disunity and Qing stalling tactics, including partial compliance like executing some pro-Boxer officials in early 1901, but the ongoing occupation of Beijing—coupled with threats of further military action—compelled concessions.[45] By summer 1901, compromises solidified: the indemnity fixed at 450 million taels of silver (principal, escalating to over 980 million with interest over 39 years), calculated against foreign claims totaling around 445 million taels; execution of 10 named officials including Prince Duan; and stationing of 8,000 foreign troops along key routes.[3] These terms, balancing punitive elements with pragmatic limits to avoid Qing collapse, culminated in the Boxer Protocol's signing on September 7, 1901, by Li Hongzhang, Prince Qing, and allied representatives in Beijing's Spanish Legation.[79]

Indemnity Demands and Economic Burdens

The Boxer Protocol, finalized on September 7, 1901, imposed on the Qing government an indemnity totaling 450 million taels of silver (approximately 18,000 tonnes) to compensate the eight-nation alliance for military expenditures, property losses, and deaths during the rebellion.[80] This principal amount carried 4 percent annual interest and was structured for repayment in 39 equal annual installments commencing in 1902, yielding a cumulative obligation of roughly 982 million taels by 1940.[81] The demands explicitly covered Allied troop maintenance costs, estimated at over 300 million taels for the expeditionary forces alone, alongside reparations for missionary and civilian casualties, with allocations apportioned by each power's contributed forces and claimed damages—Russia receiving the largest share at nearly 29 percent, followed by Germany at 20 percent.[82] To finance these payments, the Qing court levied surcharges on existing revenue streams, including a 30 percent hike on maritime customs duties (yielding about 8 million taels annually under foreign inspector oversight) and an equivalent increase on the salt gabelle, which together covered roughly half the indemnity's annual burden of 25-27 million taels.[82] Supplementary funds came from native customs duties and imperial household levies, but shortfalls prompted domestic borrowing and land tax escalations passed onto provincial taxpayers, effectively doubling some regional fiscal loads by 1905.[81] This structure entrenched foreign administrative control via entities like the Imperial Maritime Customs Service, where British official Robert Hart wielded significant influence, ensuring revenue prioritization for indemnity over domestic needs.[83] The economic strain was acute, as the indemnity equated to about 0.4 percent of China's GDP annually yet consumed nearly half of central government expenditures, diverting funds from infrastructure, military modernization, and famine relief amid ongoing droughts and floods in 1901-1903.[81] Peasant uprisings surged in salt-tax heavy provinces like Shandong and Zhili, with documented revolts in 1906-1907 linked directly to repayment-enforced collections, while the court's silver outflows exacerbated currency depreciation and inflation, eroding merchant confidence and stalling trade recovery.[83] By 1911, cumulative payments had depleted reserves to the point of default risks, fueling provincial separatism and the revolutionary fervor that toppled the dynasty, as governors like Yuan Shikai withheld funds for personal armies.[82] Later partial remissions, such as the U.S. refund of $11.5 million in 1908 for educational purposes, offered negligible relief against the entrenched fiscal dependency.[80]

Territorial Concessions and Diplomatic Shifts

The Boxer Protocol, signed on September 7, 1901, between the Qing government and representatives of eleven nations, imposed significant encroachments on Chinese sovereignty through formalized foreign military presence. It mandated the reservation of the Beijing Legation Quarter exclusively for foreign residents, to be administered by foreign authorities, effectively creating an extraterritorial enclave within the capital.[79] Foreign troops were authorized to permanently guard this quarter, with garrisons stationed along the railway lines from Shanhaiguan through Tianjin (Dagu) to Beijing, ensuring control over key transport arteries to the sea.[79] Additionally, the protocol required the dismantlement of the Dagu (Taku) Forts and all cannon batteries extending from Beijing to Shanhaiguan, neutralizing coastal and inland defenses against potential foreign incursions.[79] These measures, while not outright annexations, granted de facto territorial concessions by embedding allied forces in strategic Chinese locations, numbering in the thousands initially and persisting as legation guards.[2] Russia exploited the post-rebellion chaos to occupy much of Manchuria, deploying over 100,000 troops by late 1900 under pretexts of securing the Chinese Eastern Railway, which it had built and controlled since the 1890s.[84] This occupation, which extended beyond the Boxer suppression into 1905, involved fortifying key cities like Mukden and Harbin, establishing Russian administrative oversight, and expanding railway infrastructure without Qing consent, effectively treating the region as a protectorate.[60] Other powers, such as Germany in Shandong and Britain in the Yangtze valley, reinforced existing spheres of influence but did not annex new territories outright; however, the protocol's provisions halted Chinese fortification efforts that might have challenged these zones.[80] The United States, adhering to its Open Door policy articulated in Secretary Hay's 1899 and 1900 notes, advocated against full partition to preserve China's territorial integrity for equal commercial access, influencing a consensus among allies to avoid outright dismemberment despite individual ambitions.[80] Diplomatic shifts underscored China's diminished autonomy, with the protocol elevating the Qing's General Management of Affairs Concerning the Various Countries to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, granting it precedence over traditional ministries and signaling a forced modernization of diplomacy under foreign pressure.[79] Qing princes and officials, including Prince Qing and Li Hongzhang, were compelled to deliver formal apologies in Berlin for the murder of German minister Clemens von Ketteler and in Tokyo for the attack on Japanese diplomat Sugiyama Akira, acts that ritualized humiliation and reinforced the tributary-like status of Chinese envoys.[79] The agreement also prohibited China from importing arms or munitions for two years, crippling its military self-defense while allowing unchecked foreign garrisons, and it affirmed extraterritorial rights for foreigners, embedding legal dualism that treated Chinese territory as subject to international oversight.[2] These changes entrenched the unequal treaty system, prioritizing foreign security over Qing sovereignty and prompting internal reforms amid fears of further encroachments, though they averted immediate partition through balanced great-power rivalry.[80]

Immediate Aftermath

Occupation of Beijing by Allied Forces

On August 14, 1900, approximately 20,000 troops of the Eight-Nation Alliance—comprising contingents from Britain, the United States, Germany, France, Russia, Japan, Italy, and Austria-Hungary—breached Beijing's walls and entered the city, thereby relieving the 55-day siege of the foreign legations that had begun on June 20.[75] [2] [45] The American contingent numbered about 2,500 men.[57] This advance followed the capture of Tianjin and overcame resistance from Qing imperial troops and Boxer militias defending the capital.[85] The entry prompted the flight of Empress Dowager Cixi and the Guangxu Emperor to Xi'an, leaving Beijing under allied control.[75] Allied forces quickly secured the legation quarter and key imperial sites, including parts of the Forbidden City, establishing garrisons to maintain order and protect foreign interests.[53] Initial command was shared among national leaders, such as British General Gaselee and Japanese General Chafumi, but coordination proved challenging due to differing national objectives, particularly Russian efforts to expand influence in northern China.[45] In late September 1900, German Field Marshal Alfred von Waldersee arrived in Beijing as the appointed commander-in-chief of the allied expedition, tasked with unifying operations and pursuing remaining Boxer forces beyond the city.[75] Under his oversight, troop numbers swelled to over 45,000 by early 1901, enabling the occupation to extend control over Beijing's infrastructure and serve as a hub for diplomatic negotiations with fleeing Qing officials.[57] The occupation persisted until the Boxer Protocol's signing on September 7, 1901, which formalized Qing concessions and prompted the withdrawal of most allied troops from Beijing, though permanent legation guards from the participating nations remained stationed in the capital to safeguard diplomatic presences.[2] This period marked a temporary foreign military dominance over China's seat of government, facilitating the suppression of anti-foreign elements while exposing frictions among the allies over territorial ambitions.[75]

Suppression of Boxer Remnants

After the allied relief of Beijing on August 14, 1900, remaining Boxer forces dispersed into the countryside of northern China, particularly in Zhili and Shandong provinces, where they continued guerrilla activities against foreigners and Chinese Christians.[19] The Eight-Nation Alliance shifted focus to systematic suppression, with German Field Marshal Alfred von Waldersee assuming command of the international contingent in October 1900 upon his arrival from Europe. Waldersee directed multiple punitive expeditions into rural areas surrounding Beijing and Tianjin, aimed at rooting out Boxer bands through village raids, property destruction, and executions of suspected participants.[86] [87] These operations, numbering in the dozens, often blurred lines between combatants and civilians, as allied troops—especially German units under orders emphasizing ruthlessness—burned settlements harboring insurgents and summarily executed thousands, with estimates of Chinese fatalities from such actions reaching into the tens of thousands during late 1900 and 1901.[88] German forces conducted particularly aggressive sweeps, reflecting Kaiser Wilhelm II's directive for troops to show no mercy, which contributed to widespread reprisals beyond strict military necessity.[87] British and other allied contingents participated selectively, focusing on securing supply lines and eliminating threats, though they criticized the scale of German-led destruction as counterproductive to stabilizing the region.[89] Parallel to allied efforts, Qing loyalist armies, notably under Yuan Shikai in Shandong—the Boxer movement's origin point—intensified suppression with foreign financial support. Yuan's forces, including the Right Division, defeated scattered Boxer remnants through targeted campaigns, executing leaders and disbanding groups by early 1901, thereby aiding the overall pacification without direct allied involvement in that province.[90] By the signing of the Boxer Protocol on September 7, 1901, organized Boxer resistance had collapsed, though isolated holdouts persisted into 1902, fully eradicated by combined Qing and allied pressure.[30] These suppression actions solidified foreign military presence in northern China while exposing tensions among allies over tactics and long-term aims.

Use of Indemnity Funds and Unexpected Benefits

The Boxer Protocol of 1901 required the Qing government to pay an indemnity of 450 million Haikwan taels of silver (approximately 332 million U.S. dollars at contemporary exchange rates), plus 4% annual interest, to the eight-nation alliance over 39 years, totaling over 980 million taels by completion in 1940.[80][91] This sum, equivalent to roughly one-third of China's annual fiscal revenue at the time, was allocated among the powers based on their claimed losses and troop contributions: the United States received about 7.3% (around 30.4 million taels), Britain 11%, Germany 20%, France 15.75%, Russia 28.97%, Japan 7.73%, Italy 7.32%, and smaller shares to Austria-Hungary, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Spain.[91][81] Most powers initially applied their shares to military expenses, legation reconstructions, and debt servicing, with little immediate return to China beyond punitive intent. However, the United States, determining its actual damages and costs at under half its allocation, remitted the surplus—approximately 11.65 million dollars—in 1908, stipulating its use for Chinese education under U.S. oversight.[92] This funded the establishment of Tsinghua School (later Tsinghua University) in Beijing as a preparatory academy and the Boxer Indemnity Scholarship Program, which sponsored over 1,300 Chinese students for study in American universities from 1909 to 1929, emphasizing engineering, science, and modern governance.[91][93] By 1924, the U.S. fully remitted remaining payments, further bolstering these initiatives.[94] These remissions yielded unexpected benefits for China, transforming a symbol of humiliation into a catalyst for intellectual modernization. Tsinghua evolved into a premier research university, producing figures like physicists who contributed to China's nuclear program and leaders in republican-era reforms, while scholarship alumni, including Hu Shih and Wellington Koo, advanced diplomacy, education, and science upon return.[91] This inadvertently built human capital that strengthened China's long-term resilience against foreign dominance, countering the indemnity's original extractive purpose by fostering self-reliance through Western technical knowledge. Other powers followed selectively: Britain allocated portions post-1920s for railways and cultural exchanges, and France for scholarships, but U.S. efforts proved most transformative in scale and impact.[95][93] Critics note strategic motives—enhancing U.S. soft power amid Open Door Policy goals—but empirical outcomes prioritized Chinese capacity-building over direct exploitation.[96]

Long-Term Ramifications

Acceleration of Qing Dynasty Collapse

The Qing dynasty's initial support for the Boxer movement in June 1900, followed by its inability to suppress the uprising without foreign intervention, exposed profound military and administrative weaknesses that eroded central authority.[45] Qing forces, numbering around 100,000 troops under commanders like Ronglu and Yuxian, proved ineffective against both Boxer militias and the Eight-Nation Alliance, suffering defeats such as the failed defense of the Taku Forts on June 17, 1900, which allowed allied landings.[97] This reliance on approximately 20,000 foreign troops to relieve Beijing's legations on August 14, 1900, underscored the dynasty's dependence on external powers, further delegitimizing the court among provincial elites and intellectuals who viewed it as capitulation rather than sovereignty. The Boxer Protocol, signed on September 7, 1901, imposed an indemnity of 450 million haikwan taels (roughly 333 million U.S. dollars at the time), payable over 39 years with interest, equivalent to about three years of Qing revenue and consuming up to 40% of annual fiscal resources.[81] To meet these payments, the Qing government raised taxes on land, salt, and customs duties, exacerbating peasant hardship and fueling regional unrest, as local officials often extracted excessive levies to cover shortfalls.[98] This financial strain crippled modernization efforts, including military reforms under Yuan Shikai's Beiyang Army, which absorbed funds intended for broader restructuring, leaving the dynasty vulnerable to internal challenges.[83] These humiliations catalyzed a surge in revolutionary sentiment, accelerating the dynasty's collapse by discrediting conservative elements at court and empowering reformist and anti-Manchu factions. Post-1901 Late Qing reforms, such as the 1905 abolition of the civil service exam and provincial assemblies established in 1909, aimed to centralize power but instead fragmented it by devolving authority to local gentry, who increasingly aligned with constitutional monarchists like Kang Youwei while radicals like Sun Yat-sen organized uprisings, including the 1900 Huizhou revolt inspired by Boxer-era chaos.[99] The indemnity's burden, combined with ongoing foreign occupations—such as the allied garrison in Beijing until 1902—intensified perceptions of Qing incompetence, culminating in the Wuchang Uprising on October 10, 1911, which toppled the dynasty by February 1912 after minimal resistance from depleted imperial forces. Thus, the rebellion's aftermath directly hastened the end of over two centuries of Manchu rule by amplifying fiscal insolvency, military inefficacy, and ideological opposition.[45]

Stimulus to Chinese Nationalism and Reform

The suppression of the Boxer Rebellion by the Eight-Nation Alliance in 1901 and the ensuing Boxer Protocol exposed the Qing dynasty's profound military and administrative failures, catalyzing a surge in Chinese nationalist consciousness directed against both foreign imperialism and Manchu rule.[5] The Protocol's terms, including an indemnity payment of 450 million taels of silver (approximately 982,000,000 USD in 2023 equivalent value) to be disbursed over 39 years with interest, imposed crippling economic demands that equated to over four times China's annual fiscal revenue, exacerbating fiscal distress and highlighting the dynasty's inability to protect national sovereignty.[79] This humiliation resonated widely, transforming latent anti-foreign grievances into organized nationalist ideology, as intellectuals and elites increasingly argued that Qing incompetence had invited predatory spheres of influence, necessitating self-strengthening through either reform or revolution.[98] The rebellion's aftermath accelerated the momentum of revolutionary nationalism, particularly among overseas Chinese communities and domestic dissidents. Sun Yat-sen, whose earlier reformist efforts had faltered, capitalized on the event's fallout; by 1905, he founded the Tongmenghui (Alliance League) in Tokyo, explicitly framing the Qing's support for the Boxers and subsequent defeat as proof of Manchu alien rule's obsolescence, rallying support for republicanism over monarchical preservation.[100] Nationalist publications and societies proliferated, decrying the occupation of Beijing by foreign troops—maintained under Protocol provisions—and the execution of Boxer sympathizers, which together eroded loyalty to the throne and fostered a Han-centric identity emphasizing resistance to "barbarian" incursions.[101] This shift marked a departure from xenophobic populism toward structured anti-imperialism, influencing later movements like the anti-Manchu uprisings that presaged the 1911 Revolution. In direct response to the military debacle and indemnity burdens, the Qing court promulgated the New Policies (Xinzheng) reforms beginning with an imperial edict on January 29, 1901, aimed at centralizing authority, modernizing infrastructure, and adopting select Western administrative models to avert collapse.[102] Educational overhauls abolished the classical civil service examinations in 1905, substituting them with curricula incorporating mathematics, sciences, and foreign languages to cultivate technocratic officials, while establishing provincial academies and study-abroad programs that exposed elites to constitutional governance abroad.[103] Military restructuring created the New Armies, numbering around 500,000 troops by 1911, trained by foreign instructors and equipped with modern weaponry, intended to replace antiquated banner forces but often commanded by conservative Manchu generals, limiting efficacy.[99] These reforms, though ambitious in scope—encompassing legal codification, railway nationalization, and provincial assemblies convened from 1909—ultimately reinforced nationalist critiques by revealing the dynasty's reluctance to devolve power, as Manchu privileges persisted amid Han disenfranchisement.[104] Partial implementation bred cynicism, with fiscal strains from indemnity repayments (totaling over 980 million taels including interest) diverting funds from development and underscoring dependency, thereby stimulating demands for wholesale systemic change rather than incremental adaptation. The New Policies inadvertently disseminated republican ideas through educated youth, contributing causally to the dynasty's overthrow a decade later.[98]

Decline of Spheres of Influence in China

The joint intervention by the Eight-Nation Alliance during the Boxer Rebellion (1900) compelled competing powers—including Britain, Russia, Germany, France, Japan, the United States, Italy, and Austria-Hungary—to coordinate militarily, exposing the limitations of unilateral enforcement of exclusive spheres of influence.[16] Preceding the uprising, aggressive leasing of territories had accelerated: Germany secured Jiaozhou Bay in 1898, Russia occupied Port Arthur that year, Britain acquired Weihaiwei in 1898, and France claimed Guangzhouwan in 1898, each aiming for monopolistic control over trade, railways, and mining in designated regions. The alliance's success in capturing Beijing on August 14, 1900, without subsequent territorial partition among members, signaled that no single power could expand its sphere without risking conflict with others, as rival interests balanced against further dismemberment.[16] U.S. Secretary of State John Hay's second Open Door circular, dispatched on July 3, 1900, amid the siege of foreign legations, explicitly called for preserving China's territorial and administrative integrity alongside equal commercial opportunities, garnering tacit or explicit assent from Britain, Germany, France, Japan, and Italy while Russia demurred.[16] This diplomatic maneuver, building on Hay's 1899 notes, countered the exclusivity of spheres by advocating multilateral access to Chinese markets, effectively halting the pre-1900 "scramble for concessions" and shifting emphasis from partitioned monopolies to shared exploitation.[16] The policy's post-crisis reinforcement prevented the rebellion's chaos from justifying new exclusive leases, as powers prioritized indemnity collection—totaling 450 million taels of silver (approximately $333 million at contemporary rates)—over divisive annexations. The Boxer Protocol, signed September 7, 1901, epitomized this transition by mandating joint foreign garrisons (about 8,000 troops total) in the Beijing-Tianjin corridor for legation protection, rather than allocating zones to individual nations, thus institutionalizing collective rather than segregated foreign presence. Russia's post-protocol refusal to withdraw from Manchuria, however, provoked the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905), resulting in Japan's ascendancy in that sphere and further illustrating how attempted unilateral dominance invited international pushback, eroding the viability of isolated control.[16] By the 1910s, while formal concessions endured, their exclusivity waned under Open Door principles and rising Chinese resistance, with no major new spheres established after 1901; trade tariffs and railway loans increasingly involved consortiums of powers, diluting individual monopolies until the Republic of China's founding in 1912 accelerated renegotiations.[16]

Interpretations and Historiography

Western Contemporary Justifications

Western governments framed their military intervention in the Boxer Rebellion as a defensive measure to protect foreign diplomats, missionaries, and converts from systematic violence orchestrated by the Yihetuan (Boxers) and tacitly or overtly supported by Qing authorities. Between May and June 1900, Boxers and mobs killed approximately 136 Protestant missionaries, 47 children, and numerous Chinese Christians, while the siege of the Beijing legations from June 20 to August 14, 1900, trapped over 900 foreigners, resulting in over 200 deaths from combat, disease, and starvation.[105] The Qing court's declaration of war on eleven foreign powers on June 21, 1900, following the murder of German diplomat Clemens von Ketteler on June 20, further positioned the allied response as retaliation against state-sponsored aggression rather than unprovoked imperialism.[2] In the United States, Secretary of State John Hay justified participation through the lens of preserving commercial access and China's territorial integrity under the Open Door policy. His second Open Door circular of July 3, 1900, urged powers to refrain from exploiting the crisis for territorial gains, emphasizing instead the restoration of order to safeguard equal trading rights established by prior treaties; U.S. forces, numbering about 5,000 by August 1900, focused on relieving the legations without seeking indemnities or concessions beyond reimbursement for damages.[16] Hay attributed the uprising's violence to Qing mismanagement but stressed American aims as limited to protecting nationals—primarily missionaries and traders—and preventing the partition of China, which would disrupt U.S. exports valued at over $30 million annually.[16] British officials, under Prime Minister Lord Salisbury, cited the imperative to defend imperial subjects and treaty ports amid escalating attacks, including the deaths of 200-300 British and Indian troops and civilians in northern China by mid-1900. Salisbury's government mobilized 10,000 troops for the Seymour Expedition in June 1900 and subsequent relief efforts, portraying the campaign as upholding Britain's extensive interests—railways, concessions, and missionary stations—against a "fanatical" movement that threatened the stability of the unequal treaties since 1842.[2] Contemporary British accounts in Parliament and press highlighted the Boxers' supernatural claims and ritual murders as evidence of barbarism necessitating forceful suppression to deter recurrence, though some officials privately acknowledged overreach in post-relief occupations.[106] German rhetoric emphasized vengeance and deterrence, exemplified by Kaiser Wilhelm II's "Hun Speech" to the East Asia Expeditionary Corps on July 27, 1900, where he urged troops to show "no quarter" to Boxers, invoking the Huns' historical ferocity to justify merciless tactics against perceived treachery following the murders of two German missionaries in November 1897 and subsequent reprisals.[107] This addressed German colonial ambitions in Kiaochow Bay, seized in 1897, framing intervention as retribution for attacks on 24 German missionaries killed by 1900 and a means to enforce respect for European prestige.[105] French justifications centered on safeguarding Catholic missions, with over 200 French priests and converts slain, while invoking protectorates over Chinese Catholics under 19th-century accords; Russian motives blended protection of Orthodox interests with opportunistic advances into Manchuria, though officially tied to legation relief.[3] Across powers, these rationales prioritized empirical threats—documented massacres and sieges—over abstract civilizing missions, though public discourse often invoked the latter to legitimize allied unity.[108]

Chinese Nationalist Narratives

Chinese nationalist narratives, emerging prominently during the Republican era under the Kuomintang (KMT), reframed the Yihetuan—commonly known as the Boxers—as courageous proto-nationalists resisting foreign imperialism, crediting their 1899–1900 uprising with channeling popular fury against Western and Japanese encroachments, including missionary activities and economic spheres of influence that had extracted concessions since the 1842 Treaty of Nanking.[80] These accounts highlighted the Boxers' martial practices and anti-Christian campaigns as symbolic defiance of cultural erosion, portraying their slogan "Support the Qing, destroy the foreigners" as an authentic call for sovereignty amid Qing weakness, though blaming the dynasty's vacillation—initial tolerance followed by alliance with the Eight-Nation Alliance in June 1900—for the movement's suppression.[1] KMT leaders, including Chiang Kai-shek, praised the Boxers' fearlessness against technologically superior foes, interpreting the rebellion's failure not as evidence of superstition or disorganization but as a tragic lesson in the need for disciplined nationalism to overcome internal division and external predation.[109] This reinterpretation evolved from earlier Republican criticisms by intellectuals like Hu Shih, who in the 1920s–1930s decried the Boxers' reliance on magical invulnerability rituals and intra-Chinese violence against converts as backward obstacles to modernization, yet nationalists increasingly mythologized the event to foster unity, emphasizing foreign atrocities during the Beijing occupation—such as the sacking of the Forbidden City and execution of Chinese officials—as justification for future revanchism.[109] By the 1930s, amid Japanese aggression, the narrative integrated the Boxer Rebellion into a broader "century of humiliation" framework, underscoring how the 1901 Boxer Protocol's 450 million taels (approximately 982 million U.S. dollars at contemporary exchange rates) indemnity crippled China's economy and symbolized capitulation, thereby stimulating demands for military reform and anti-imperialist mobilization that presaged the Northern Expedition and resistance wars.[110] Such views selectively downplayed the Boxers' xenophobic excesses, including the murder of around 32,000 Chinese Christians and destruction of infrastructure, to prioritize causal emphasis on foreign provocation as the root cause of unrest.[111] In post-1949 Taiwan under KMT rule, this historiographic thread persisted, portraying the uprising as a flawed but inspirational stand against "barbarian" incursions, with educational materials linking it to the party's Three Principles of the People—nationalism, democracy, and livelihood—as antidotes to the Qing's feudal failures and foreign indemnities that diverted funds from domestic development.[112] Critics within nationalist circles acknowledged the movement's tactical shortcomings, such as untrained peasant militias facing modern artillery, but attributed long-term vindication to its role in eroding Manchu legitimacy and accelerating republican ideals, evidenced by the 1911 Revolution's success just a decade later.[113] These narratives, while empowering identity formation, have been noted for idealizing the Boxers' agency over empirical complexities like drought-induced famine in Shandong province (1898–1899) that initially mobilized rural discontent against both foreigners and local elites.[114]

Modern Scholarly Reassessments and Myths

Modern scholarship has increasingly framed the Boxer Uprising as a multifaceted response to tangible pressures rather than mere fanaticism, emphasizing environmental disasters, economic dislocation from foreign trade, and resentment over missionary privileges under unequal treaties. Joseph Esherick's 1987 analysis reconstructs the movement's origins in Shandong Province's martial arts groups, such as the Big Sword Society, which evolved amid 1898-1899 droughts and floods that killed millions and fueled millenarian beliefs in spirit possession for invulnerability against bullets.[115] [116] This view counters earlier portrayals of the Boxers as irrational hordes, attributing their anti-foreign and anti-Christian violence—resulting in approximately 32,000 Chinese Christian deaths—to competition over resources and perceived cultural erosion, rather than inherent xenophobia divorced from context.[113] Paul Cohen's 1997 examination dissects the event across historical reconstruction, participant experiences, and enduring myths, highlighting how Western narratives mythologized the Beijing legation siege (June 20-August 14, 1900) as a heroic stand against barbarism, while eliding allied atrocities during the relief expedition, such as the looting of Beijing and summary executions estimated at 20,000-30,000.[117] In China, Cohen notes a post-1949 shift under Communist historiography to recast the uprising as a proto-nationalist anti-imperialist struggle, suppressing evidence of Qing endorsement and intra-Chinese violence against converts, which comprised the majority of victims.[118] Such reinterpretations, while grounded in archival recovery, reflect ideological influences; mainland sources often amplify foreign culpability to align with state narratives of resistance, potentially understating the Boxers' superstitious rituals and indiscriminate killings that alienated potential allies.[119] A persistent myth depicts the Boxers as an underdog popular revolt against the Qing dynasty itself, but Esherick demonstrates they lacked anti-Manchu sentiment, instead receiving imperial support via edicts in June 1900 declaring war on foreigners.[115] Another fallacy, challenged in reassessments of reciprocity, portrays the Eight-Nation Alliance's intervention solely as defensive; while the siege claimed 230 foreign lives, allied forces' reprisals involved systematic plunder and civilian massacres, yet these were reactive to Boxer-initiated assaults on missionaries and rail infrastructure since November 1899.[120] Undergraduate reappraisals like N. Van Allen's 2008 work further debunk romanticized martyrdom, arguing no evidence supports viewing the Yihetuan as selfless nationalists, given their role in pogroms against 200,000-300,000 Chinese adherents to Christianity, driven by local power struggles rather than unified ideology.[113] These scholarly corrections prioritize causal chains—imperial encroachments provoking unrest, exacerbated by climatic crises—over moral binaries, though post-colonial lenses in academia sometimes overemphasize victimhood at the expense of the movement's internal contradictions.[121]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.