Hubbry Logo
ModernityModernityMain
Open search
Modernity
Community hub
Modernity
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Modernity
Modernity
Modernity
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of a series on
Human history
↑ Prehistory (Stone Age)   (Pleistocene epoch)
Holocene
Ancient
Postclassical
Modern
See also
↓ Future   

Modernity, a topic in the humanities and social sciences, is both a historical period (the modern era) and the ensemble of particular socio-cultural norms, attitudes and practices that arose in the wake of the Renaissance—in the Age of Reason of 17th-century thought and the 18th-century Enlightenment. Commentators variously consider the era of modernity to have ended by 1930, with World War II in 1945, or as late as the period falling between the 1980s and 1990s; the following era is often referred to as "postmodernity". The term "contemporary history" is also used to refer to the post-1945 timeframe, without assigning it to either the modern or postmodern era. (Thus "modern" may be used as a name of a particular era in the past, as opposed to meaning "the current era".)

Depending on the field, modernity may refer to different time periods or qualities. In historiography, the 16th to 18th centuries are usually described as early modern, while the long 19th century corresponds to modern history proper. While it includes a wide range of interrelated historical processes and cultural phenomena (from fashion to modern warfare), it can also refer to the subjective or existential experience of the conditions they produce, and their ongoing impact on human culture, institutions, and politics.[1]

As an analytical concept and normative idea, modernity is closely linked to the ethos of philosophical and aesthetic modernism; political and intellectual currents that intersect with the Enlightenment; and subsequent developments such as existentialism, modern art, the formal establishment of social science, and contemporaneous antithetical developments such as Marxism. It also encompasses the social relations associated with the rise of capitalism, and shifts in attitudes associated with secularization, liberalization, modernization and post-industrial life.[1]

By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, modernist art, politics, science and culture had come to dominate not only Western Europe and North America, but almost every populated area on the globe, including movements opposing the West or opposing globalization. The modern era is closely associated with the development of individualism,[2] capitalism,[3] urbanization[2] and progressivism—that is, the belief in the possibilities of technological and political progress.[4][5] Perceptions of problems arising from modernization, which can include the advent of world wars, the reduced role of religion in some societies, or the erosion of traditional cultural norms, have also led to anti-modernization movements.[6][7] Optimism and the belief in consistent progress (also referred to as whig history) have been subject to criticism in postmodern thought, while the global hegemonic dominance (particularly in the form of imperialism and colonialism) of various powers in western Europe and Anglo-America for most of the period has been criticized in postcolonial theory.

In the context of art history, modernity (Fr. modernité) has a more limited sense, modern art covering the period of c. 1860–1970. Use of the term in this sense is attributed to Charles Baudelaire, who in his 1863 essay "The Painter of Modern Life", designated the "fleeting, ephemeral experience of life in an urban metropolis", and the responsibility art has to capture that experience. In this sense, the term refers to "a particular relationship to time, one characterized by intense historical discontinuity or rupture, openness to the novelty of the future, and a heightened sensitivity to what is unique about the present".[8][failed verification]

Etymology

[edit]

The Late Latin adjective modernus, a derivation from the adverb modo ("presently, just now", also "method"), is attested from the 5th century CE, at first in the context of distinguishing the Christian era of the Later Roman Empire from the Pagan era of the Greco-Roman world. In the 6th century CE, Roman historian and statesman Cassiodorus appears to have been the first writer to use modernus ("modern") regularly to refer to his own age.[9]

The terms antiquus and modernus were used in a chronological sense in the Carolingian era. For example, a magister modernus referred to a contemporary scholar, as opposed to old authorities such as Benedict of Nursia. In its early medieval usage, the term modernus referred to authorities regarded in medieval Europe as younger than the Greco-Roman scholars of Classical antiquity and/or the Church Fathers of the Christian era, but not necessarily to the present day, and could include authors several centuries old, from about the time of Bede, i.e. referring to the time after the foundation of the Order of Saint Benedict and/or the fall of the Western Roman Empire.[10]

The Latin adjective was adopted in Middle French, as moderne, by the 15th century, and hence, in the early Tudor period, into Early Modern English. The early modern word meant "now existing", or "about the present times", not necessarily with a positive connotation. English author and playwright William Shakespeare used the term modern in the sense of "everyday, ordinary, commonplace".

The word entered wide usage in the context of the late 17th-century quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns within the Académie Française, debating the question of "Is Modern culture superior to Classical (Græco–Roman) culture?" In the context of this debate, the ancients (anciens) and moderns (modernes) were proponents of opposing views, the former believing that contemporary writers could do no better than imitate the genius of Classical antiquity, while the latter, first with Charles Perrault (1687), proposed that more than a mere Renaissance of ancient achievements, the Age of Reason had gone beyond what had been possible in the Classical period of the Greco-Roman civilization. The term modernity, first coined in the 1620s, in this context assumed the implication of a historical epoch following the Renaissance, in which the achievements of antiquity were surpassed.[11]

Phases

[edit]

Modernity has been associated with cultural and intellectual movements of 1436–1789 and extending to the 1970s or later.[12]

According to Marshall Berman,[13] modernity is periodized into three conventional phases dubbed "Early", "Classical", and "Late" by Peter Osborne:[14]

  • Early modernity: 1500–1789 (or 1453–1789 in traditional historiography)
    • People were beginning to experience a more modern life (Laughey, 31).
  • Classical modernity: 1789–1900 (corresponding to the long 19th century (1789–1914) in Hobsbawm's scheme)
    • Consisted of the rise and growing use of daily newspapers, telegraphs, telephones and other forms of mass media, which influenced the growth of communicating on a broader scale (Laughey, 31).
  • Late modernity: 1900–1989
    • Consisted of the globalization of modern life (Laughey, 31).

In the second phase, Berman draws upon the growth of modern technologies such as the newspaper, telegraph, and other forms of mass media. There was a great shift into modernization in the name of industrial capitalism. Finally, in the third phase, modernist arts and individual creativity marked the beginning of a new modernist age as it combats oppressive politics, economics as well as other social forces including mass media.[15][citation needed]

Some authors, such as Lyotard and Baudrillard,[citation needed] believe that modernity ended in the mid- or late 20th century and thus have defined a period subsequent to modernity, namely Postmodernity (1930s/1950s/1990s–present). Other theorists, however, regard the period from the late 20th century to the present as merely another phase of modernity; Zygmunt Bauman[16] calls this phase liquid modernity, Giddens labels it high modernity (see High modernism).[17]

Definition

[edit]

Political

[edit]

Politically, modernity's earliest phase starts with Niccolò Machiavelli's works which openly rejected the medieval and Aristotelian style of analyzing politics by comparison with ideas about how things should be, in favour of realistic analysis of how things really are. He also proposed that an aim of politics is to control one's own chance or fortune, and that relying upon providence actually leads to evil. Machiavelli argued, for example, that violent divisions within political communities are unavoidable, but can also be a source of strength which lawmakers and leaders should account for and even encourage in some ways.[18]

Machiavelli's recommendations were sometimes influential upon kings and princes, but eventually came to be seen as favoring free republics over monarchies.[19] Machiavelli in turn influenced Francis Bacon,[20] Marchamont Needham,[21] James Harrington,[21] John Milton,[22] David Hume,[23] and many others.[24]

Important modern political doctrines which stem from the new Machiavellian realism include Mandeville's influential proposal that "Private Vices by the dextrous Management of a skilful Politician may be turned into Publick Benefits" (the last sentence of his Fable of the Bees), and also the doctrine of a constitutional separation of powers in government, first clearly proposed by Montesquieu. Both these principles are enshrined within the constitutions of most modern democracies. It has been observed that while Machiavelli's realism saw a value to war and political violence, his lasting influence has been "tamed" so that useful conflict was deliberately converted as much as possible to formalized political struggles and the economic "conflict" encouraged between free, private enterprises.[25][26]

Starting with Thomas Hobbes, attempts were made to use the methods of the new modern physical sciences, as proposed by Bacon and Descartes, applied to humanity and politics.[27] Notable attempts to improve upon the methodological approach of Hobbes include those of John Locke,[28] Spinoza,[29] Giambattista Vico,[30] and Rousseau.[31] David Hume made what he considered to be the first proper attempt at trying to apply Bacon's scientific method to political subjects,[32] rejecting some aspects of the approach of Hobbes.

Modernist republicanism openly influenced the foundation of republics during the Dutch Revolt (1568–1609),[33] English Civil War (1642–1651),[21] American Revolution (1775–1783),[34] the French Revolution (1789–1799), and the Haitian Revolution (1791–1804).[35]

A second phase of modernist political thinking begins with Rousseau, who questioned the natural rationality and sociality of humanity and proposed that human nature was much more malleable than had been previously thought. By this logic, what makes a good political system or a good man is completely dependent upon the chance path a whole people has taken over history. This thought influenced the political (and aesthetic) thinking of Immanuel Kant, Edmund Burke, and others and led to a critical review of modernist politics. On the conservative side, Burke argued that this understanding encouraged caution and avoidance of radical change. However, more ambitious movements also developed from this insight into human culture, initially Romanticism and Historicism, and eventually both the Communism of Karl Marx, and the modern forms of nationalism inspired by the French Revolution, including, in one extreme, the German Nazi movement.[36]

On the other hand, the notion of modernity has been contested also due to its Euro-centric underpinnings. Postcolonial scholars have extensively critiqued the Eurocentric nature of modernity, particularly its portrayal as a linear process originating in Europe and subsequently spreading—or being imposed—on the rest of the world. Dipesh Chakrabarty contends that European historicism positions Europe as the exclusive birthplace of modernity, placing European thinkers and institutions at the center of Enlightenment, progress, and innovation. Latin America's version of modernity is a prime example of a contradiction to European modernity. During Europe's imperial conquest, ultimately created a dominant version of colonialism that the world would associate with modernity, Mexico provided an alternative version of modernity that contradicted the brutal and harsh nature of colonial Europe.[37] This narrative marginalizes non-Western thinkers, ideas, and achievements, reducing them to either deviations from or delays in an otherwise supposedly universal trajectory of modern development.[38] Frantz Fanon similarly exposes the hypocrisy of European modernity, which promotes ideals of progress and rationality while concealing how much of Europe’s economic growth was built on the exploitation, violence, and dehumanization integral to colonial domination.[39] Similarly, Bhambra argued that beyond economic advancement, Western powers "modernized" through colonialism, demonstrating that developments such as the welfare systems in England were largely enabled by the wealth extracted through colonial exploitation.[40]

Sociological

[edit]
Cover of the original German edition of Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

In sociology, a discipline that arose in direct response to the social problems of modernity,[41] the term most generally refers to the social conditions, processes, and discourses consequent to the Age of Enlightenment. In the most basic terms, British sociologist Anthony Giddens describes modernity as

...a shorthand term for modern society, or industrial civilization. Portrayed in more detail, it is associated with (1) a certain set of attitudes towards the world, the idea of the world as open to transformation, by human intervention; (2) a complex of economic institutions, especially industrial production and a market economy; (3) a certain range of political institutions, including the nation-state and mass democracy. Largely as a result of these characteristics, modernity is vastly more dynamic than any previous type of social order. It is a society—more technically, a complex of institutions—which, unlike any preceding culture, lives in the future, rather than the past.[42]

Other writers have criticized such definitions as just being a listing of factors. They argue that modernity, contingently understood as marked by an ontological formation in dominance, needs to be defined much more fundamentally in terms of different ways of being.

The modern is thus defined by the way in which prior valences of social life ... are reconstituted through a constructivist reframing of social practices in relation to basic categories of existence common to all humans: time, space, embodiment, performance and knowledge. The word 'reconstituted' here explicitly does not mean replaced.[43]

This means that modernity overlays earlier formations of traditional and customary life without necessarily replacing them. In a 2006 review essay, historian Michael Saler extended and substantiated this premise, noting that scholarship had revealed historical perspectives on modernity that encompassed both enchantment and disenchantment. Late Victorians, for instance, "discussed science in terms of magical influences and vital correspondences, and when vitalism began to be superseded by more mechanistic explanations in the 1830s, magic still remained part of the discourse—now called 'natural magic,' to be sure, but no less 'marvelous' for being the result of determinate and predictable natural processes." Mass culture, despite its "superficialities, irrationalities, prejudices, and problems," became "a vital source of contingent and rational enchantments as well." Occultism could contribute to the conclusions reached by modern psychologists and advanced a "satisfaction" found in this mass culture. In addition, Saler observed that "different accounts of modernity may stress diverse combinations or accentuate some factors more than others...Modernity is defined less by binaries arranged in an implicit hierarchy, or by the dialectical transformation of one term into its opposite, than by unresolved contradictions and oppositions, or antinomies: modernity is Janus-faced."[44]

In 2020 Jason Crawford critiqued this recent historiography on enchantment and modernity. The historical evidence of "enchantments" for these studies, particularly in mass and print cultures, "might offer some solace to the citizens of a disenchanted world, but they don't really change the condition of that world." These "enchantments" offered a "troubled kind of unreality" increasingly separate from modernity.[45] Per Osterrgard and James Fitchett advanced a thesis that mass culture, while generating sources for "enchantment", more commonly produced "simulations" of "enchantments" and "disenchantments" for consumers.[46]

Cultural and philosophical

[edit]

The era of modernity is characterised socially by industrialisation and the division of labour, and philosophically by "the loss of certainty, and the realization that certainty can never be established, once and for all".[11] With new social and philosophical conditions arose fundamental new challenges. Various 19th-century intellectuals, from Auguste Comte to Karl Marx to Sigmund Freud, attempted to offer scientific and/or political ideologies in the wake of secularisation. Modernity may be described as the "age of ideology".[47]

For Marx what was the basis of modernity was the emergence of capitalism and the revolutionary bourgeoisie, which led to an unprecedented expansion of productive forces and to the creation of the world market. Durkheim tackled modernity from a different angle by following the ideas of Saint-Simon about the industrial system. Although the starting point is the same as Marx, feudal society, Durkheim emphasizes far less the rising of the bourgeoisie as a new revolutionary class and very seldom refers to capitalism as the new mode of production implemented by it. The fundamental impulse to modernity is rather industrialism accompanied by the new scientific forces. In the work of Max Weber, modernity is closely associated with the processes of rationalization and disenchantment of the world.[48]

Critical theorists such as Theodor Adorno and Zygmunt Bauman propose that modernity or industrialization represents a departure from the central tenets of the Enlightenment and towards nefarious processes of alienation, such as commodity fetishism and the Holocaust.[49][page needed][50] Contemporary sociological critical theory presents the concept of rationalization in even more negative terms than those Weber originally defined. Processes of rationalization—as progress for the sake of progress—may in many cases have what critical theory says is a negative and dehumanising effect on modern society.[49][page needed][51]

Enlightenment, understood in the widest sense as the advance of thought, has always aimed at liberating human beings from fear and installing them as masters. Yet the wholly enlightened earth radiates under the sign of disaster triumphant.[52]

What prompts so many commentators to speak of the 'end of history', of post-modernity, 'second modernity' and 'surmodernity', or otherwise to articulate the intuition of a radical change in the arrangement of human cohabitation and in social conditions under which life-politics is nowadays conducted, is the fact that the long effort to accelerate the speed of movement has presently reached its 'natural limit'. Power can move with the speed of the electronic signal – and so the time required for the movement of its essential ingredients has been reduced to instantaneity. For all practical purposes, power has become truly exterritorial, no longer bound, or even slowed down, by the resistance of space (the advent of cellular telephones may well serve as a symbolic 'last blow' delivered to the dependency on space: even the access to a telephone market is unnecessary for a command to be given and seen through to its effect.[53]

Consequent to debate about economic globalization, the comparative analysis of civilizations, and the post-colonial perspective of "alternative modernities", Shmuel Eisenstadt introduced the concept of "multiple modernities".[54][11] Modernity as a "plural condition" is the central concept of this sociologic approach and perspective, which broadens the definition of "modernity" from exclusively denoting Western European culture to a culturally relativistic definition, thereby: "Modernity is not Westernization, and its key processes and dynamics can be found in all societies".[11]

Secularization

[edit]
Main article: Secularity

Central to modernity is emancipation from religion, specifically the hegemony of Christianity (mainly Roman Catholicism), and the consequent secularization.[citation needed] According to writers like Fackenheim and Husserl, modern thought repudiates the Judeo-Christian belief in the Biblical God as a mere relic of superstitious ages.[55][56][note 1] It all started with Descartes' revolutionary methodic doubt, which transformed the concept of truth in the concept of certainty, whose only guarantor is no longer God or the Church, but Man's subjective judgement.[57][58][note 2]

Theologians have adapted in different ways to the challenge of modernity. Liberal theology, over perhaps the past 200 years or so, has tried, in various iterations, to accommodate, or at least tolerate, modern doubt in expounding Christian revelation, while Traditionalist Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and fundamentalist Protestant thinkers and clerics have tried to fight back, denouncing skepticism of every kind.[59][60][61][62][note 3] Modernity aimed towards "a progressive force promising to liberate humankind from ignorance and irrationality".[63]

Scientific

[edit]
Main article: Modern science

In the 16th and 17th centuries, Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and others developed a new approach to physics and astronomy which changed the way people came to think about many things. Copernicus presented new models of the Solar System which no longer placed humanity's home, Earth, in the centre. Kepler used mathematics to discuss physics and described the regularities of nature this way. Galileo actually made his famous proof of uniform acceleration in freefall using mathematics.[64]

Francis Bacon, especially in his Novum Organum, argued for a new methodological approach. It was an experimental-based approach to science, which sought no knowledge of formal or final causes. [citation needed] Yet, he was no materialist. He also talked of the two books of God, God's Word (Scripture) and God's work (nature).[65] But he also added a theme that science should seek to control nature for the sake of humanity, and not seek to understand it just for the sake of understanding. In both these things, he was influenced by Machiavelli's earlier criticism of medieval Scholasticism, and his proposal that leaders should aim to control their own fortune.[64]

Influenced both by Galileo's new physics and Bacon, René Descartes argued soon afterward that mathematics and geometry provided a model of how scientific knowledge could be built up in small steps. He also argued openly that human beings themselves could be understood as complex machines.[66]

Isaac Newton, influenced by Descartes, but also, like Bacon, a proponent of experimentation, provided the archetypal example of how both Cartesian mathematics, geometry and theoretical deduction on the one hand, and Baconian experimental observation and induction on the other hand, together could lead to great advances in the practical understanding of regularities in nature.[67][68]

Technological

[edit]

One common conception of modernity is the condition of Western history since the mid-15th century, or roughly the European development of movable type[69] and the printing press.[70] In this context the modern society is said to develop over many periods and to be influenced by important events that represent breaks in the continuity.[71][72][73]

Artistic

[edit]
Main article: Modern art

After modernist political thinking had already become widely known in France, Rousseau's re-examination of human nature led to a new criticism of the value of reasoning itself which in turn led to a new understanding of less rationalistic human activities, especially the arts. The initial influence was upon the movements known as German Idealism and Romanticism in the 18th and 19th centuries. Modern art therefore belongs only to the later phases of modernity.[74]

For this reason art history keeps the term modernity distinct from the terms Modern Age and Modernism – as a discrete "term applied to the cultural condition in which the seemingly absolute necessity of innovation becomes a primary fact of life, work, and thought". And modernity in art "is more than merely the state of being modern, or the opposition between old and new".[75]

In the essay "The Painter of Modern Life" (1863), Charles Baudelaire gives a literary definition: "By modernity, I mean the transitory, the fugitive, the contingent".[76]

Advancing technological innovation, affecting artistic technique and the means of manufacture, changed rapidly the possibilities of art and its status in a rapidly changing society. Photography challenged the place of the painter and painting. Architecture was transformed by the availability of steel for structures.

Theological

[edit]

From conservative Protestant theologian Thomas C. Oden's perspective, modernity is marked by "four fundamental values":[77]

  • "Moral relativism (which says that what is right is dictated by culture, social location, and situation)"
  • "Autonomous individualism (which assumes that moral authority comes essentially from within)"
  • "Narcissistic hedonism (which focuses on egocentric personal pleasure)"
  • "Reductive naturalism (which reduces what is reliably known to what one can see, hear, and empirically investigate)"

Modernity rejects anything "old" and makes "novelty ... a criterion for truth." This results in a great "phobic response to anything antiquarian." In contrast, "classical Christian consciousness" resisted "novelty".[77]

Within Roman Catholicism, Pope Pius IX and Pope Pius X claim that Modernism (in a particular definition of the Catholic Church) is a danger to the Christian faith. Pope Pius IX compiled a Syllabus of Errors published on December 8, 1864, to describe his objections to Modernism.[78] Pope Pius X further elaborated on the characteristics and consequences of Modernism, from his perspective, in an encyclical entitled "Pascendi Dominici gregis" (Feeding the Lord's Flock) on September 8, 1907.[79] Pascendi Dominici Gregis states that the principles of Modernism, taken to a logical conclusion, lead to atheism. The Roman Catholic Church was serious enough about the threat of Modernism that it required all Roman Catholic clergy, pastors, confessors, preachers, religious superiors and seminary professors to swear an Oath against modernism[80] from 1910 until this directive was rescinded in 1967, in keeping with the directives of the Second Vatican Council.[citation needed]

Defined

[edit]

Of the available conceptual definitions in sociology, modernity is "marked and defined by an obsession with 'evidence'," visual culture, and personal visibility.[81] Generally, the large-scale social integration constituting modernity, involves the:[citation needed]

  • increased movement of goods, capital, people, and information among formerly discrete populations, and consequent influence beyond the local area
  • increased formal social organization of mobile populaces, development of "circuits" on which they and their influence travel, and societal standardization conducive to socio-economic mobility
  • increased specialization of the segments of society, i.e., division of labor, and area inter-dependency
  • increased level of excessive stratification in terms of social life of a modern man
  • Increased state of dehumanisation, dehumanity, unionisation, as man became embittered about the negative turn of events which sprouted a growing fear.
  • man became a victim of the underlying circumstances presented by the modern world
  • Increased competitiveness among people in the society (survival of the fittest) as the jungle rule sets in.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Modernity

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Modernity denotes the historical epoch and socio-cultural paradigm that emerged in from the and onward, supplanting medieval and ecclesiastical dominance with frameworks centered on rational inquiry, empirical , individual agency, and accumulative . This transformation, spanning roughly the 16th to 20th centuries, featured pivotal advancements including the Scientific Revolution's methodological , the Enlightenment's advocacy for reason over dogma, and the Industrial Revolution's shift to mechanized production and labor, yielding exponential rises in productivity, population, and material prosperity. Defining traits encompass bureaucratic rationalization, national division of labor, and the ethos of relentless profit-seeking as a , with attributing the latter's genesis to Protestant doctrines emphasizing ascetic discipline and worldly success as divine signs. Modernity's triumphs lie in harnessing human ingenuity to conquer scarcity and extend lifespans through technological mastery, yet it provoked controversies over ""—the erosion of transcendent meaning amid instrumental routines—and fueled total wars and ideological upheavals by prioritizing state power and over inherited moral orders.

Terminology and Conceptual Foundations

Etymology and Evolution of the Term

The term "modernity" derives from modernitās (nominative modernitas), meaning the quality or state of being modern, which stems from modernus ("present-day" or "recent"), an adjective coined from the adverb modō ("just now" or "in a certain manner"), ultimately linked to modus ("measure," "limit," or "way"). In English, the noun emerged in the 1620s–1630s as a of the Latin form, initially denoting temporal recency or contemporaneity rather than a specific cultural or historical . The identifies the earliest recorded use in 1635, in George Hakewill's An Apologie or Declaration of the Power and Providence of God, where it refers to the distinctive features of the present age as compared to antiquity, employed to counter narratives of civilizational decline by asserting ongoing progress. similarly dates the first known English attestation to 1635, aligning with this mid-17th-century introduction amid debates over historical cycles versus linear advancement. Early usages of "modernity" retained a primarily descriptive sense of "newness" or "up-to-dateness," often contrasted with classical or feudal precedents without inherent normative endorsement. The adjective "modern," entering English circa 1500 via moderne and modernus (attested from the 5th century CE in post-Roman contexts to signify deviation from ancient norms), frequently carried neutral or even derogatory implications, as in Renaissance-era critiques labeling contemporary deviations from Greco-Roman ideals as inferior. By the late 17th and 18th centuries, however, the term began shifting toward affirmative connotations amid scientific and philosophical upheavals; for instance, Enlightenment figures invoked "modern" advancements in and to claim superiority over scholastic traditions, transforming "modernity" from mere chronology to a marker of rational . In the , "modernity" crystallized as a substantive concept denoting systemic breaks from pre-industrial orders, encompassing industrialization, , and bureaucratic rationalization as causal drivers of . This evolution reflected causal linkages between technological causation (e.g., power's role in economic acceleration post-1760) and institutional shifts, with the term gaining analytical depth in to describe capitalism's disenchanting effects on . By mid-century, it encapsulated the era's self-perception as propelled by empirical , distinct from cyclical historical views, though not without critiques of its alienating consequences.

Core Definitions and Distinctions


Modernity denotes the historical epoch and societal condition originating in from the onward, defined by the ascendancy of rational thought, scientific inquiry, and institutional structures oriented toward individual liberty and technological mastery over nature. This era encompasses transformations in governance from monarchical absolutism to constitutional states, economic shifts from agrarian to industrial , and cultural moves from religious orthodoxy to . Sociologist characterized modernity through the intensification of rationalization, where calculable, rule-based procedures replace charismatic or , fostering bureaucratic organizations and market efficiencies. A pivotal aspect of modernity is the disenchantment of the world, as Weber termed it in his 1917 lecture "Science as a Vocation," wherein mystical and theological interpretations of reality yield to empirical, causal explanations grounded in observable evidence and instrumental reason. This process entails not merely intellectual shifts but causal mechanisms like the Protestant ethic's promotion of disciplined labor and reinvestment, which Weber argued catalyzed the "spirit" of capitalism essential to modern economic dynamism. Core distinctions separate modernity from premodernity, where societies adhered to hierarchical, kinship-based orders sustained by divine-right legitimacy and subsistence economies, lacking systematic or universal legal frameworks. Premodern worldviews prioritized subjective, faith-driven cosmologies over objective measurement, contrasting modernity's emphasis on predictability, quantification, and human agency in reshaping social and orders. Modernity must also be differentiated from modernism, the latter being a specific late-19th to mid-20th-century cultural and artistic movement that embraced , irony, and rupture with classical forms in response to modern conditions, rather than the broader socio-institutional processes themselves. While modernity involves structural realities like and —evident by 1900 when over 30% of Europe's population lived in cities—modernism manifests as avant-garde experimentation in fields like and , often critiquing modernity's alienating effects. This delineation underscores that modernity's empirical foundations persist independently of interpretive artistic reactions. Modernity contrasts with pre-modern traditional societies, which were predominantly agrarian, kinship-based, and governed by religious or customary authorities rather than rational-legal bureaucracies or market mechanisms. This shift involved the replacement of ascriptive hierarchies with achievement-oriented structures, enabling and innovation but also eroding communal ties. The concept builds directly on Enlightenment principles of reason, empirical inquiry, and human progress, originating in the 17th and 18th centuries with thinkers like Locke and Kant who prioritized individual rights and skepticism toward tradition. Unlike the Enlightenment's philosophical focus, however, modernity encompasses the institutionalization of these ideas through revolutions, such as the in 1776 and the in 1789, which established secular governance and constitutionalism. Modernity differs from , the latter being an artistic, literary, and intellectual movement peaking around 1890–1940 that responded to modernity's upheavals—, technological acceleration, and World War I's carnage—by experimenting with form, subjectivity, and fragmentation in works by figures like Joyce and Picasso. embraced modernity's dynamism while critiquing its alienation, whereas , emerging post-1945 amid and nuclear threats, rejects modernity's grand narratives of progress and universal rationality in favor of irony, pluralism, and skepticism toward metanarratives. Secularization forms a core but contested relation to modernity, posited in theories like those of Weber and Durkheim as arising from rationalization and differentiation of social spheres, leading to religion's privatization in by the mid-20th century, where fell below 20% in countries like Britain by 2000. Empirical data, however, challenge the universality of this "," showing rising with modernization in developing nations—such as sub-Saharan Africa's Christian growth from 9% of world Christians in 1900 to 24% in 2020—and persisting or reviving in affluent contexts like the U.S., where 65% identified as Christian in 2020 despite declines. This variability underscores that modernization does not causally necessitate religious decline, as institutional biases in Western academia have overstated the while underemphasizing cultural resilience. Modernity also intersects with , as analyzed by Weber in , linking Protestant to rational economic behavior and the "spirit" of accumulation that fueled industrialization from Britain's 1760s textile innovations onward. This economic rationalization complemented political liberalism's emphasis on individual liberty and , distinguishing modernity from absolutist or feudal precedents.

Historical Phases

Early Modernity (c. 1500–1789)

The period of early modernity, approximately 1500 to 1789, represented a pivotal transition in Western , characterized by the of medieval structures and the foundations of empirical inquiry, global commerce, and state centralization. Overseas explorations expanded European horizons, religious schisms undermined universalist institutions, and advancements in laid groundwork for mechanistic understandings of , collectively challenging feudal hierarchies and theological dominance. These developments, while uneven and often violent, fostered , market-oriented economies, and rational models that presaged later modern institutions. European voyages of discovery, building on Portuguese initiatives from the 1410s and intensified by Christopher Columbus's 1492 , established direct maritime links to the , , and by the early . Spanish conquests under (1519–1521) and (1532–1533) yielded vast silver inflows from mines like , which flooded European markets and fueled price revolutions estimated at 1–2% annual inflation from 1500 to 1600. This influx stimulated proto-capitalist trade networks, including the Manila galleons linking to the , but exacted catastrophic tolls on , with New World populations declining by up to 90% due to Old World diseases like , alongside enslavement and warfare. The Protestant Reformation, ignited by Martin Luther's posting of the on October 31, 1517, repudiated papal indulgences and asserted —scripture alone as authority—spurring widespread doctrinal challenges across . By 1555, the permitted rulers to determine territorial religions, fragmenting the into Lutheran, Calvinist, and Catholic domains, while Calvin's model emphasized and disciplined labor, correlating with nascent commercial ethics. These shifts eroded the Catholic Church's monopoly on interpretation, promoting vernacular Bibles and literacy rates that rose from under 10% to over 30% in Protestant regions by 1700, though they also ignited conflicts like the (1618–1648), which halved Germany's population to around 3 million in affected areas. Revisionist analyses attribute the Reformation's long-term causality to modernity via weakened theocratic controls, enabling secular legalism and economic rationalism, despite contemporaneous religious wars. Parallel to religious upheaval, the redefined knowledge through observation and mathematics, commencing with Nicolaus Copernicus's 1543 , which posited a heliocentric solar system displacing geocentric orthodoxy. Johannes Kepler's laws of planetary motion (1609–1619), derived from Tycho Brahe's data, and Galileo's telescopic validations of Jupiter's moons (1610) empirically contested Aristotelian teleology, while Isaac Newton's (1687) unified gravitation and mechanics under universal laws, F=ma and inverse-square attraction. This paradigm prioritized testable hypotheses over scholastic deduction, with experimental societies like the Royal Society (founded 1660) institutionalizing peer verification; by 1700, such methods had yielded barometers, pendulums, and , underpinning technological applications in and artillery. In the , Enlightenment thinkers synthesized these strands into critiques of absolutism and tradition, advocating reason as sovereign. John Locke's (1689) grounded property rights and consent-based rule in , influencing , while Voltaire's campaigns against intolerance (e.g., Calas affair, 1762) and Montesquieu's The Spirit of the Laws (1748) separated powers to curb monarchical excess, as seen in Louis XIV's Versailles-centered absolutism (r. 1643–1715), which amassed 500,000 troops but strained finances via wars costing billions in livres. David Hume's empiricism (1748 Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau's (1762) emphasized sensory evidence and , respectively, eroding divine-right justifications amid fiscal crises; by 1789, these ideas converged in revolutionary fervor, with U.S. independence (1776) demonstrating viability. Empirical data from state revenues—France's 400 million livres annually by 1780 versus mounting debts—underscore causal pressures from mercantilist expansion toward reformist imperatives. ![Die_protestantische_Ethik_und_der_'Geist'_des_Kapitalismus_original_cover.jpg][float-right] doctrines, particularly Calvinism's worldly , inadvertently cultivated capitalist predispositions by valorizing rational calculation and reinvestment over bans, as evidenced in rising Dutch and English joint-stock ventures like the (1600), which amassed £7.5 million in trade by 1700. Yet, this era's innovations coexisted with persistences: endured in , and inquisitorial persecutions claimed thousands, illustrating modernity's uneven genesis amid causal tensions between innovation and tradition.

Classical Modernity (1789–1945)

The period of classical modernity, from the of 1789 to the conclusion of in 1945, represented the maturation and crisis of modern institutions, characterized by the expansion of rational bureaucracy, industrial production, and ideological . Triggered by the , which dismantled feudal privileges and proclaimed universal rights, this era saw the diffusion of Enlightenment-derived principles such as and secular governance, yet these often clashed with entrenched hierarchies, yielding cycles of reform, reaction, and radical upheaval. Industrial capitalism propelled unprecedented , with Europe's GDP per capita rising roughly threefold between 1820 and 1913, driven by and global trade, but this engendered sharp inequalities and labor exploitation. The era's optimism in human progress, rooted in positivist faith in science and reason, unraveled amid total wars that claimed over 100 million lives, exposing modernity's capacity for organized destruction through industrialized warfare and totalitarian regimes. Politically, the French Revolution's abolition of the monarchy in 1792 and subsequent Napoleonic Wars (1799–1815) disseminated constitutionalism and nationalism, unifying fragmented states like Italy (completed 1870) and Germany (1871 under Bismarck), while fostering liberal parliaments in Britain and elsewhere. However, these advances coexisted with authoritarian backlashes: the 1848 revolutions across Europe failed to entrench democracy, paving the way for imperial consolidations and, later, totalitarian experiments such as Mussolini's fascist Italy (1922), Stalin's Soviet Union (post-1924 purges claiming 20 million lives), and Hitler's Nazi Germany (1933–1945). Imperial expansion peaked in the late 19th century, with European powers controlling 84% of the globe's land by 1914, justified by civilizing missions but driven by resource extraction and strategic rivalry, culminating in World War I (1914–1918), which mobilized 70 million soldiers and killed 16–20 million. Economically, the Second Industrial Revolution (c. 1870–1914) introduced production, , and chemicals, boosting output: Britain's coal production, for instance, surged from 10 million tons in 1800 to 287 million in 1913, fueling as city populations grew from 10% to over 50% in . Capitalism's dynamism spurred innovations like the telegraph (1837) and automobile (1885), but provoked socialist responses, including Marx's (1867), which critiqued exploitation amid falling real wages for workers during depressions. The (1929–1939) contracted global GDP by 15%, exacerbating unemployment to 25% in and the U.S., and eroding faith in liberal markets. Socially, mass education and literacy rates climbed—France's from 20% in 1800 to 80% by 1900—enabling print media and to shape politics, yet widening class divides fueled strikes and unions, with over 10 million European workers organized by 1914. Demographic shifts included a boom to 1.6 billion globally by 1930, strained by migrations and pandemics like the 1918 influenza (50 million deaths), while gender roles evolved slowly, with granted in Britain (1918 partial) and the U.S. (1920). (1939–1945), with its 70–85 million fatalities including systematic genocides like (6 million Jews), marked the nadir, as mechanized conflict and ideological extremism revealed classical modernity's internal contradictions: the very tools of rational progress enabled unprecedented barbarism.

Late Modernity (1945–present)

The period following in 1945 marked the onset of a global order dominated by the rivalry between the and the , which persisted until the Soviet collapse in 1991 and influenced alliances, proxy conflicts, and ideological divisions worldwide. The emerged as the preeminent economic and military power, establishing institutions like the in 1945 and providing economic aid through the to rebuild , averting communist expansion and spurring growth rates averaging 4-5% annually in recipient nations during the late 1940s and 1950s. Decolonization accelerated, with over 50 former colonies gaining independence by 1960, including in 1947 and much of sub-Saharan Africa in the , often amid ethnic conflicts and economic dependency on former metropoles. Economically, the era witnessed the "Great Acceleration," a surge in human population from 2.5 billion in 1950 to over 8 billion by 2023, coupled with exponential increases in global GDP, energy use, and , driven by industrial expansion and consumer booms in the West. In the United States, post-war prosperity included the enabling 7.8 million veterans to access higher education by 1956, fueling and a tripling of real from 1945 to 1973, though racial disparities persisted with households earning roughly 55% of incomes in 1960. Welfare states expanded in and , with social spending rising to 20-30% of GDP by the , but oil shocks in 1973 and 1979 triggered , averaging 7-10% inflation and 5-7% unemployment in countries, prompting neoliberal reforms under leaders like Thatcher and Reagan in the . The end of the in 1989-1991, with the Wall's fall and USSR dissolution, facilitated market liberalization in and former Soviet states, though transition economies contracted 40-50% initially before partial recovery. Technological advancements, amplified by competition, transformed communication, computation, and production, with the invented in 1947 enabling miniaturization and the precursor to the launched in 1969, leading to worldwide web adoption by over 5 billion users by 2023. Nuclear arsenals peaked at 70,000 warheads by 1986, underscoring existential risks, while space achievements included the in 1969 and ongoing networks. intensified post-1991, with world trade volume growing from $4 trillion in 1990 to $28 trillion by 2022, facilitated by container shipping and supply chains, though vulnerabilities emerged in events like the , which erased $10 trillion in global stock value, and the 2020 , causing 7 million excess deaths and 3-5% GDP contractions worldwide. China's economic rise, averaging 9-10% annual growth from 1980-2010, shifted manufacturing and challenged Western dominance, contributing to a multipolar order by the .

Debates on Liquid and Reflexive Modernity

introduced the concept of liquid modernity in his 2000 book of the same name, arguing that late modern society has shifted from "solid" structures—such as stable institutions, lifelong employment, and fixed identities—to fluid, ephemeral forms where social bonds dissolve rapidly under the pressures of , , and neoliberal economics. In this phase, individuals must continuously reconstruct their biographies amid uncertainty, with traditional certainties replaced by short-term pursuits and a consumerist ethos that prioritizes adaptability over commitment. Human bonds are treated as consumer goods, lasting only until satisfaction ends rather than for life; individuality turns into a consumptive addiction, fostering de jure freedom but de facto lack of real autonomy and social support, resulting in insecurity. Bauman contrasted this with earlier "heavy" or "solid" modernity, exemplified by industrial-era bureaucracies and nation-state solidity, positing liquidity as a deliberate outcome of deregulated markets that erode collective security. In parallel, and developed the theory of reflexive modernity during the late 1980s and early 1990s, describing it as a second or advanced stage of modernity where societies increasingly confront and reflect upon the of their own progress, such as environmental risks and technological hazards. Risk Society (first published in German in 1986, English translation 1992) emphasized how manufactured risks—global in scale and democratically distributed—demand reflexive institutions and individual agency to mitigate threats like nuclear accidents or , supplanting class-based conflicts with risk-based politics. Giddens, in The Consequences of Modernity (1990), highlighted "institutional reflexivity," where expert systems and disembedded social relations enable ongoing self-critique and adaptation, fostering detraditionalization and through personal narratives amid time-space distanciation. Together with Scott Lash, they framed reflexive modernity as optimistic about human capacity for steering societal evolution, contrasting it with postmodern fragmentation by affirming continuity within modernity's logic. Debates between liquid and reflexive modernity center on their assessments of agency, structure, and societal trajectory in . Bauman explicitly critiqued reflexive approaches, including Beck's "second modernity," as overly sanguine, arguing in Liquid Modernity that precludes genuine re-embedding or , instead amplifying individual vulnerability in a world of perpetual flux without stable "beds" for reconstruction. He viewed reflexive modernity's emphasis on self-steering as illusory under , where freedom manifests as precarious rather than empowered reflection, leading to a more dystopian portrayal of dissolving solidarities compared to the reflexive theorists' focus on and institutional innovation. Critics of Bauman, such as Ali Rattansi, contend that liquid modernity underplays persistent structural inequalities and over-relies on metaphors of fluidity, potentially neglecting of resilient identities and networks in diverse contexts. Conversely, reflexive modernity has faced accusations of excessive , with scholars like Matthew Adams arguing that its individualization thesis—shared affinities with Bauman's —ignores enduring traditions and power asymmetries, as reflexive agents remain constrained by global capital and state policies. Comparative analyses highlight liquid modernity's pessimism toward neoliberal dissolution versus reflexive modernity's agency-oriented optimism, yet both are challenged for ; for instance, multiple modernities theorists like Shmuel Eisenstadt critique them for universalizing Western experiences while sidelining non-Western paths shaped by local contingencies. Empirical studies, such as those on post-2008 economic , lend partial support to Bauman's in documenting rising gig economies and identity instability (e.g., EU-wide peaking at 23.8% in 2013), but reflexive frameworks better explain adaptive responses like transnational risk governance in the of 2015. These debates underscore tensions between structural and reflexive potential, with neither paradigm fully resolving the causal interplay of market deregulation and societal self-awareness in late modern dynamics.

Institutional and Structural Features

Political and Governance Transformations

The Treaty of Westphalia, concluded on October 24, 1648, ended the and established the principle of territorial , whereby rulers held exclusive authority within their borders free from external religious or imperial interference, forming the basis of the modern nation-state system. This agreement curtailed the Holy Roman Empire's supranational ambitions and promoted a balance-of-power among coequal states, reducing large-scale religious conflicts in and enabling centralized governance structures. Enlightenment philosophers profoundly shaped modern by emphasizing rationalism, individual rights, and limited government. John Locke's (1689) articulated theory, positing that legitimate authority derives from consent and protects natural rights to life, , and , influencing constitutional frameworks. Montesquieu's The Spirit of the Laws (1748) advocated separation of powers into legislative, executive, and judicial branches to prevent tyranny, a concept embedded in subsequent republican constitutions. These ideas challenged , fostering the transition to rule-of-law systems where prioritized empirical accountability over divine right. The (1775–1783) and (1789–1799) operationalized Enlightenment principles, establishing the first modern republics with elected assemblies and bills of rights. The U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1788, implemented and checks-and-balances, limiting centralized power while enabling . The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789) asserted and , though initial implementations devolved into instability, highlighting tensions between democratic ideals and practical governance. By the , these models spurred expansions—such as Britain's Reform Act of 1832 extending voting to middle-class males—and the formation of nation-states via unification processes, like in 1861 and in 1871, which consolidated bureaucratic administrations and legal uniformity. In the , modernity saw the rise of totalitarian regimes as alternatives to , exemplified by Soviet under Lenin from 1917 and Nazi under Hitler from 1933, which centralized power through single-party control, mass mobilization, and suppression of opposition using modern technologies like and . These systems rejected pluralism, prioritizing ideological conformity over individual liberties, resulting in over 100 million deaths from purges, famines, and wars by mid-century estimates. (1939–1945) discredited , paving the way for 's expansion: post-1945 created over 50 new states adopting electoral systems, while the War's end in 1991 saw democracy's "third wave," with global democratic nations rising from 30 in 1974 to 120 by 1990, driven by economic pressures and legitimacy deficits in authoritarian models. Governance evolved toward welfare states, with bureaucracies managing redistribution—e.g., U.S. of 1935—and international bodies like the (1945) coordinating sovereignty-respecting norms, though empirical data shows mixed outcomes, with democratic stability correlating to per-capita GDP above $6,000 but vulnerabilities to and . Academic analyses, often from institutions with ideological leanings, may understate 's ideological roots in collectivist thought while overattributing democracy's successes to procedural forms rather than underlying cultural and economic causal factors like property rights enforcement.

Economic and Industrial Developments

The transition to modernity involved a shift from predominantly agrarian and feudal economies to commercial and industrial systems, beginning in around the with the rise of , which emphasized state-directed trade surpluses, colonial expansion, and accumulation of bullion as measures of national wealth. This period saw the emergence of capitalist practices, including private ownership of capital, wage labor, and market-oriented production, facilitated by innovations like joint-stock companies and banking systems that enabled larger-scale commerce. By the 17th and 18th centuries, these developments laid the groundwork for sustained economic expansion, with European powers leveraging overseas trade routes to import raw materials and export manufactured goods, thereby increasing incomes in leading nations like the and Britain. The , commencing in Britain circa 1760 and spreading to and by the early , marked a causal turning point through and energy, transforming production from to factory-based systems dominated by steam power, iron , and machinery. Key innovations, such as James Watt's improved in 1769 and the in 1764, enabled and reduced costs, leading to output growth rates that averaged 2% per decade in productivity from 1600 to 1800, accelerating to 5% per decade between 1810 and 1860 in Britain. This era's economic impacts included the first sustained rises in per capita GDP, with Britain's real GDP increasing from approximately £1,700 in 1700 to £3,200 by 1820 (in 1990 international dollars), driven by and technological diffusion rather than mere . Industrialization restructured labor markets, shifting workers from to urban factories and fostering the growth of a capitalist class that reinvested profits into further innovation. In classical modernity (1789–1945), economic developments emphasized policies and , with global trade volumes expanding amid railway networks and steamships, but punctuated by cycles of boom and bust, including the of 1873–1896. The Second Industrial Revolution, from the 1870s onward, introduced electricity, steel production via the (1856), and chemical industries, propelling U.S. GDP growth to average 4% annually between 1870 and 1913. These advances correlated with improved living standards in industrialized nations, as rose and consumer goods proliferated, though unevenly, with agricultural displacing rural labor and exacerbating urban poverty initially. Post-1945 featured state-coordinated reconstruction, such as the Marshall Plan's $13 billion in aid (equivalent to $150 billion today) to , fueling the "" of growth with annual GDP increases of 4-5% in countries until the 1970s oil shocks. intensified through institutions like the GATT (1947) and WTO (1995), reducing trade barriers and integrating supply chains, which contributed to global GDP per capita rising from $2,500 in 1950 to over $10,000 by 2000 (in constant dollars). Empirical data indicate fell from nearly 80% in in 1981 to 18% by the 2000s, largely due to market-oriented reforms and export-led industrialization in . The shift to service and knowledge economies, accelerated by from the , saw manufacturing's share of decline in advanced economies—from 30% in the U.S. in 1950 to under 10% by 2020—while gains from doubled output per worker in sectors like and . These developments underscore modernity's causal engine of innovation-driven growth, though recent stagnation in advanced economies highlights limits from regulatory burdens and demographic shifts.

Scientific and Technological Advancements

The , initiated in the , established empirical observation, experimentation, and mathematical reasoning as core principles of inquiry, diverging from scholastic reliance on ancient authorities. Nicolaus Copernicus's (1543) advanced the heliocentric model, positing Earth orbits the Sun, supported by later telescopic evidence from , who in 1609 refined the to observe Jupiter's moons and Venus's phases, confirming over Ptolemaic geocentrism. Isaac Newton's (1687) unified terrestrial and celestial motion through laws of gravitation and calculus-derived dynamics, enabling predictive models of planetary trajectories with precision verified by subsequent observations like in 1758. These developments fostered a mechanistic , where natural phenomena were quantifiable and causally deterministic, underpinning later engineering feats. Technological innovations during the (late 18th to mid-19th centuries) harnessed these scientific principles for mechanized production, exponentially scaling human output. James Watt's improved (patented 1769) achieved 75% greater efficiency than predecessors by incorporating a separate condenser, powering factories, mines, and locomotives that reduced times from weeks to days. The (1764) and (1785) automated , boosting British cotton output from 5 million pounds in 1780 to 366 million by 1830, driven by water and steam power. Iron production surged via coke smelting (1709 onward) and (1856), yielding 500,000 tons annually in Britain by 1870, facilitating railroads spanning 15,000 miles by 1850 and accelerating global trade at speeds up to 60 mph. These causal chains—scientific laws applied to energy conversion—multiplied productivity, with per capita GDP in leading economies rising 1-2% annually post-1800, verifiable through historical output records. In the 20th century, relativity and quantum mechanics redefined physical limits, enabling technologies from nuclear energy to semiconductors. Albert Einstein's special relativity (1905) predicted E=mc², realized in the first controlled fission chain reaction (1942) yielding 200 watts initially, scaling to power plants generating gigawatts by the 1950s. Max Planck's quantum hypothesis (1900) underlay the transistor (1947), shrinking electronics from vacuum tubes to integrated circuits, with Moore's Law observing transistor density doubling every two years, culminating in microprocessors executing billions of operations per second by 2000. Biological insights, including DNA's double helix structure (1953), spurred genomics, sequencing the human genome (2003) at 3 billion base pairs, accelerating drug development with clinical trials reducing development timelines from 10+ years pre-1990 to under 5 in targeted therapies. Space exploration, via rocketry informed by Newtonian principles, achieved lunar landing (1969), with empirical data from 384,000 miles traveled yielding technologies like miniaturized computing now integral to global positioning systems accurate to meters. These advancements, grounded in falsifiable experimentation, have empirically extended human capabilities, with global R&D expenditure reaching $2.5 trillion by 2020, correlating to sustained innovation rates.

Secularization and Religious Shifts

Secularization in modernity describes the process whereby religious authority and influence diminish in public institutions and personal worldviews, driven by rationalization, scientific advancement, and the differentiation of social spheres. Max Weber characterized this as the "disenchantment of the world," where intellectualization and bureaucratic rationalism replace mystical explanations with calculable, causal understandings, originating in processes like the Protestant Reformation and extending through Enlightenment rationalism. Empirical trends substantiate declines in religious participation and affiliation, particularly in Western societies. In , the Christian population fell by 9% from 2010 to 2020, reaching 505 million, amid broader evidenced by reduced and ritual participation. In the United States, self-identified Christians dropped from 75% in 2011 to 63% in 2021, stabilizing around 62% by 2025, with religiously unaffiliated adults rising to about 30%. Globally, the share of religiously affiliated individuals declined slightly from 76.7% in 2010 to approximately 75.7% by 2020, following a sequenced : first erosion of public rituals, then diminished personal importance of , and finally affiliation loss. These shifts reflect not uniform eradication but transformations in religious expression. , , and correlate with declining , as higher socioeconomic development fosters individualized belief over institutional adherence. Sociologist Peter Berger, an early proponent of secularization theory, later revised his views, arguing that modernity fosters —competing faiths in open markets—which sustains vitality in orthodox or fundamentalist subgroups while marginalizing moderate ones, countering predictions of inevitable decline. Resurgences challenge simplistic narratives of linear . In non-Western contexts, demographic growth sustains religious populations, with projections indicating Christianity's global share holding amid regional variations. Political mobilizations, such as evangelical influences in or Islamist movements, demonstrate religion's enduring public role, often adapting to modern structures rather than fading. This pluralism-driven dynamism underscores causal realism: proceeds unevenly, propelled by modernization's structural forces yet resisted by cultural and institutional adaptations.

Intellectual and Cultural Dimensions

Philosophical Underpinnings

The philosophical underpinnings of modernity trace their origins to the and , marking a departure from medieval scholasticism's integration of faith and Aristotelian teleology toward a mechanistic grounded in human reason and empirical inquiry. This transition emphasized toward traditional authorities, including the Church, and prioritized methodical and as paths to certain knowledge. Rationalism and emerged as dominant strands, with thinkers asserting that truth derives from innate ideas or sensory experience rather than divine revelation. René Descartes (1596–1650), often regarded as the founder of , exemplified this rationalist turn through his (1641), where he employed systematic doubt to strip away unreliable beliefs, arriving at the indubitable foundation of in the proposition ("I think, therefore I am"). This cogito established the thinking subject as the bedrock of , independent of external or theological validation, and influenced subsequent developments in dualism—separating mind from body—and the quest for clear, distinct ideas as criteria for truth. Descartes' mechanistic conception of nature as res extensa (extended substance) governed by mathematical laws further undermined medieval , paving the way for scientific naturalism. In contrast, empiricists like (1632–1704) countered pure by positing the mind as a (blank slate) at birth, filled solely through sensory experience and reflection, as outlined in (1689). Locke's rejection of innate ideas underscored the contingency of knowledge on observation, influencing modern notions of , liberty, and theory by emphasizing environmental shaping over predestined essences. This empiricist framework complemented , fostering a hybrid that prioritized evidence over dogma. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) synthesized these traditions in his (1781) and (1788), arguing for the mind's active role in structuring experience via a priori categories while delimiting reason's bounds to avoid metaphysical overreach. Kant's emphasis on autonomy—the capacity for self-legislating moral agents—epitomized Enlightenment ideals, defining maturity as using one's understanding without external guidance, as in his 1784 essay "What is Enlightenment?" This underscored modernity's commitment to individual agency and critique, though it retained a that preserved moral freedom against deterministic materialism.

Artistic and Aesthetic Expressions

Modernity's artistic and aesthetic expressions evolved through radical experimentation, reflecting industrialization, urbanization, scientific advances, and the disruptions of world wars, which prompted artists to prioritize subjectivity, fragmentation, and innovation over mimetic representation or harmonious ideals derived from antiquity. This shift began in the late with , which captured fleeting effects of light and atmosphere using loose brushwork, as exemplified by Claude Monet's series Haystacks (1890–1891), emphasizing perceptual immediacy over narrative depth. Subsequent movements like , developed by and from 1907 onward, deconstructed objects into geometric facets to convey simultaneity and multiple perspectives, challenging perspective. , peaking around 1910–1920 in , distorted forms to externalize emotional turmoil, as in Edvard Munch's (1893), responding to existential alienation amid rapid . In literature, modernist authors rejected linear plotting and omniscient narration for interior monologues and mythic allusions, capturing the disjointed consciousness of modern individuals amid cultural upheaval. James Joyce's Ulysses (1922) employed stream-of-consciousness to parallel Homer's with a single day on June 16, 1904, layering psychological depth with linguistic play. T.S. Eliot's (1922) fragmented voices and allusions to evoke post-World War I disillusionment, incorporating and Eastern to diagnose spiritual barrenness. These techniques underscored modernity's emphasis on individual perception over collective harmony, influencing later writers like in (1925). Musical developments paralleled this rupture, with introducing around 1908, eschewing major-minor key systems for free in pieces like (1909), to express unbound emotional states unconfined by tonal resolution. His twelve-tone , formalized in the 1920s, organized pitches into rows to impose structure on dissonance, as in the Suite for Piano (1923), influencing composers like and . Concurrently, emerged in the United States around 1910 from African American communities, blending , , and blues scales—Louis Armstrong's Hot Five recordings (1925–1928) exemplified its polyrhythmic vitality—gaining global traction as a symbol of urban dynamism and cultural hybridity. Architecture embodied modernity's functionalist ethos, prioritizing utility and machine aesthetics over ornamentation. The , established by in in 1919 and relocated to in 1925, integrated art, craft, and technology under the motto "," training designers in and geometric simplicity using steel, concrete, and glass. This laid groundwork for the , codified in the 1932 exhibition at New York's , featuring rectilinear volumes, flat roofs, and curtain walls, as in Ludwig Mies van der Rohe's Seagram Building (1958) or Le Corbusier's (1929–1931), which adapted industrial efficiency to human habitation. In post-1945, postmodern aesthetics reacted against modernist austerity with eclecticism, irony, and historical quotation, as theorized by in (1979), rejecting grand narratives for localized, playful forms. saw Abstract Expressionism's gestural abstraction in Jackson Pollock's drip paintings (1947–1950), emphasizing process and subconscious release, followed by Pop Art's appropriation of consumer imagery, like Andy Warhol's (1962), blurring high and . Literature incorporated and , as in Thomas Pynchon's (1973), while architecture revived ornament in buildings like Robert Venturi's Vanna Venturi House (1964), critiquing International Style's uniformity. These expressions, while innovative, often drew conservative critiques for prioritizing shock over enduring beauty, though empirical reception metrics—like auction records exceeding $450 million for Picasso's works by 2023—attest to their market-validated impact.

Social Norms and Individualism

Modernity marked a profound shift toward , departing from medieval collectivism where social roles were rigidly prescribed by , , and feudal obligations. This transition, accelerating from the onward, emphasized personal agency, self-reliance, and individual achievement over communal conformity. Historical analysis quantifies this rise through metrics like name uniqueness in Western records from 1500 to 1900, indicating growing differentiation of from familial or communal ties. Max Weber attributed the cultural foundations of this individualism to the Protestant ethic, particularly , which promoted a disciplined, inner-worldly and the pursuit of worldly success as signs of divine favor. In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (), Weber argued that Protestant doctrines fostered an individualistic by rejecting mediation and emphasizing personal responsibility for , thereby laying groundwork for rational economic behavior and autonomy. This ethic contrasted with Catholic traditions of otherworldly renunciation, contributing to the "disenchantment" of social life and the elevation of individual calling over . Empirical data across 77 countries from 1960 to 2011 reveal a global uptick in individualistic practices and values, with scores rising in most nations, driven by , , and —hallmarks of modernity. In Western societies, this manifested in cultural revolutions across , , and social life, prioritizing personal and self-expression. Hofstede's cultural dimensions framework scores Western nations highly on , where loose social ties and self-interest prevail over group loyalty, a pattern intensifying post-Industrial Revolution. Social norms evolved accordingly, with traditional constraints on family and sexuality loosening. shifted from lifelong covenants arranged for or to voluntary unions based on romantic affinity, enabling serial monogamy and higher rates; U.S. prevalence rose from about 10 per 1,000 married women in 1920 to peaks near 23 in 1980 before stabilizing. and normalized, with Gallup polls showing U.S. moral acceptance of extramarital affairs edging from 1% in 1969 to 6% in 2020, while out-of-wedlock births climbed from under 5% in 1960 to 40% by 2010 in many developed nations. Sexual initiation ages declined across generations in and , from medians around 19-20 in the early to 16-17 by the , alongside greater acceptance of diverse partnerships; U.S. approval of relations surged from 40% in 2001 to 69% in 2021. These shifts reflect individualism's prioritization of personal fulfillment over reproductive or communal imperatives, correlating with fertility declines—from global averages of 4.98 births per woman in 1960 to 2.3 in 2021 per UN data—yet enabling expanded choices in partnering and parenthood. Critics note potential downsides, such as weakened intergenerational , but links high to and growth, as self-directed pursuits drive and adaptability. Nonetheless, recent surveys indicate nascent reversals toward purpose-seeking and collectivism among younger cohorts, suggesting individualism's trajectory may not be unidirectional.

Empirical Achievements and Causal Impacts

Material and Living Standard Improvements

Modernity has precipitated unprecedented gains in human welfare through advancements in production, , and , enabling billions to escape subsistence living. Empirical data indicate that global rose from approximately 30 years in 1800 to over 72 years by the early , driven by reductions in infectious diseases, improved , and medical innovations such as and antibiotics. This near-doubling reflects causal mechanisms including paired with reforms and the of , which increased food availability and caloric intake per capita. Extreme poverty, defined as living on less than $1.90 per day in 2011 , declined from about 76% of the in 1820 to roughly 10% by 2018, lifting over 2 billion people from destitution. These reductions correlate with industrial expansion, free-market trade, and technological diffusion, which boosted incomes and consumer goods access; for instance, the share of the global population in halved multiple times between 1820 and 1980, accelerating post-1950 amid . Concurrently, infant and plummeted: under-five mortality fell from around 43% in the to 3.7% by 2020, attributable to clean water systems, , and maternal practices that curbed diarrheal and respiratory infections. Access to basic infrastructure further elevated living standards. Global electrification expanded from negligible levels before 1900—when electricity generation totaled just 66 terawatt-hours—to universal near-access by the late 20th century, with 90.4% of the population connected by 2020, powering refrigeration, lighting, and machinery that reduced drudgery and preserved perishables. Sanitation revolutions in the 19th and 20th centuries, including piped water and sewage systems, slashed waterborne diseases like cholera; by the mid-20th century, urban access to treated water in industrialized nations exceeded 90%, contributing to a 90% drop in typhoid mortality rates. Nutritional metrics improved accordingly, with average daily caloric supply rising from subsistence levels (around 2,000-2,200 kcal per capita in pre-industrial Europe) to over 2,800 kcal globally by 2000, facilitated by fertilizers, mechanized farming, and global supply chains. These material enhancements, rooted in empirical innovations rather than redistributive policies alone, underscore modernity's capacity to expand human flourishing through scalable productivity gains.

Innovation-Driven Progress

Innovation in modernity, particularly from the late onward, has fundamentally transformed human productivity and material welfare through sequential waves of technological breakthroughs, enabling sustained economic expansion and the alleviation of scarcity. The , commencing around 1760 in Britain, introduced mechanized production via inventions such as James Watt's improved in 1769, which powered factories and railroads, multiplying output in textiles and transportation. This shift from agrarian economies to industrialized ones precipitated a marked in ; global GDP , stagnant for millennia prior, rose from approximately $667 in 1820 to over $2,500 by 1900 in 1990 international Geary-Khamis dollars, reflecting productivity gains from and division of labor. Empirical analyses attribute this takeoff to "technological modernity," where continuous invention became the core driver of growth, outpacing pre-modern eras reliant on land and labor. Subsequent innovations amplified these effects during the Second Industrial Revolution (circa 1870–1914), with —stemming from Thomas Edison's practical incandescent bulb in 1879 and systems—enabling 24-hour operations and assembly lines, as exemplified by Henry Ford's automobile production in 1913, which reduced vehicle costs by 70% through mass manufacturing. Productivity surged accordingly; U.S. manufacturing output per worker doubled between 1890 and 1910 due to these efficiencies. By the mid-20th century, the advent of semiconductors in 1947 and integrated circuits paved the way for computing revolutions, culminating in widespread personal computers by the and the internet's commercialization in 1995, which facilitated global information exchange and , boosting aggregate productivity by an estimated 0.5–1% annually in advanced economies during the 1990s–2000s. Global GDP per capita continued its exponential trajectory, reaching about $17,000 by 2018, a 25-fold increase from 1820 levels, with accounting for the bulk of this divergence from Malthusian constraints. These advancements have causally linked to broader flourishing, including drastic eradication and gains. rates, exceeding 80% of the global in 1820, plummeted to under 10% by 2019, driven by innovation-enabled agricultural yields (e.g., hybrid seeds post-1930s tripling output per hectare) and trade liberalization. Similarly, average rose from around 31 years in 1800 to 72 years by 2019, with modern pharmaceuticals—such as penicillin's from 1943—responsible for roughly 35% of gains between 1990 and 2015 through reduced infectious disease mortality. Such outcomes underscore innovation's role in decoupling progress from resource limits, though uneven distribution persists across regions.

Expansion of Liberty and Rights

Modernity witnessed a profound shift toward recognizing individual liberties as inherent rather than granted by monarchs or , driven by Enlightenment emphasis on reason, natural rights, and . Thinkers like argued for life, liberty, and property as natural entitlements, influencing constitutional frameworks that curtailed arbitrary power. This culminated in foundational documents such as the English in 1689, which affirmed parliamentary supremacy and protections against cruel punishments, and the Act of 1679, safeguarding against unlawful detention. The American in 1776 explicitly invoked unalienable rights to , , and the pursuit of happiness, justifying rebellion against tyranny and establishing a for republican governance. Similarly, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen in 1789 proclaimed , property, security, and resistance to oppression as natural and imprescriptible rights, inspired by Enlightenment and marking a break from absolutism. These principles spread through revolutions and reforms, eroding feudal privileges and divine-right monarchies across and the by the early . Abolition of represented a pivotal expansion, transitioning from tolerated chattel systems to legal prohibitions grounded in human dignity. Britain's Slave Trade Act of 1807 banned the transatlantic trade, followed by the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833, which emancipated over 800,000 slaves in the empire with compensated owners. In the United States, the 13th Amendment in 1865 abolished nationwide after the Civil War, freeing approximately 4 million people, while the 14th Amendment in 1868 guaranteed equal protection and . By the late , nations like (1888) and several European colonies followed suit, reflecting moral and economic pressures amid industrial modernization that diminished reliance on coerced labor. Women's rights advanced through suffrage campaigns, challenging patriarchal legal disabilities. The Seneca Falls Convention of 1848 in the U.S. demanded voting rights, echoing Declaration rhetoric, leading to granting women suffrage in 1869—the first jurisdiction to do so. achieved national women's suffrage in 1893, in 1902, and the U.S. via the 19th Amendment in 1920, enfranchising about 27 million women. These gains correlated with and access, enabling advocacy, though implementation varied and faced resistance until broader democratic norms solidified post-World War I. The 20th century globalized these expansions via the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948, articulating 30 articles encompassing civil, political, economic, and social rights for all without distinction. Though non-binding, the UDHR influenced over 80 human rights treaties and national constitutions, fostering institutions like the European Convention on Human Rights (1950) and accelerating decolonization movements that dismantled imperial hierarchies. Empirical data shows corresponding rises in democratic states—from 12 in 1900 to 120 by 2000—correlating with literacy and GDP growth that empowered broader rights enforcement.

Major Criticisms and Counterperspectives

Traditionalist and Conservative Critiques

Traditionalist critiques of modernity, articulated by thinkers such as René Guénon and Julius Evola, posit that the modern era represents a profound rupture from perennial metaphysical truths and hierarchical spiritual orders, leading to a "reign of quantity" dominated by materialism and egalitarianism. Guénon, in works like The Crisis of the Modern World (1927), argued that Western civilization's disconnection from transcendent principles since the Renaissance has accelerated a cyclical decline akin to the Hindu Kali Yuga, manifesting in the erosion of sacred traditions and the triumph of profane individualism. Evola extended this in Revolt Against the Modern World (1934), decrying modernity's inversion of natural hierarchies—replacing aristocratic, initiatic elites with mass democracy and bourgeois values—as a symptom of spiritual involution, urging a return to primordial, warrior-like traditions over progressive historicism. Conservative critiques, rooted in 's defense of organic social evolution against abstract rationalism, emphasize modernity's disruption of inherited customs, orders, and communal bonds in favor of ideological experimentation. , in Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), warned that Enlightenment abstractions like unbridled and equality dismantle the "latent wisdom" of traditions, fostering anarchy and tyranny, as evidenced by the French Revolution's violence and subsequent Napoleonic despotism. , building on in The Conservative Mind (1953), outlined conservatism's adherence to a transcendent order, of concentrated power, and reverence for the "permanent things" like and , critiquing modern and centralization as eroding the variety of human experience and fostering ideological fanaticism. Contemporary conservatives extend these arguments to liberalism's internal contradictions, where individual autonomy undermines the preconditions for liberty, such as stable families and local communities. Patrick Deneen, in Why Liberalism Failed (2018), contends that liberalism's liberation from traditional constraints—through market individualism and state expansion—has atomized society, evidenced by declining marriage rates (from 72% of adults in 1960 to 50% in 2019 in the U.S.) and rising social isolation, ultimately requiring greater government intervention that contradicts liberal ideals of self-reliance. Roger Scruton further critiqued modernity's aesthetic desecration, arguing in essays like "The Fabric of the City" that modernist architecture's functionalist brutalism—exemplified by Le Corbusier's high-rises—rejects human-scale beauty and permanence, contributing to urban alienation and cultural homogenization by prioritizing ego-driven novelty over communal harmony. These perspectives, while varying in emphasis, converge on modernity's causal role in spiritual, social, and aesthetic decay, substantiated by observable metrics like family dissolution and cultural uniformity rather than unsubstantiated utopian promises.

Marxist and Economic Critiques

Marxist critiques frame modernity primarily as the historical epoch of capitalism, which, while advancing productive forces beyond feudalism, generates systemic exploitation and contradictions destined to undermine it. Karl Marx, in Das Kapital (1867), analyzed capitalism as a mode of production where surplus value—extracted from unpaid labor time—is appropriated by capitalists, fostering class antagonism between bourgeoisie and proletariat. This process, Marx contended, drives modernity's dynamism through accumulation but immiserates workers by reducing labor to a commodity, divorced from its creative essence. Empirical observations of 19th-century industrialization, such as England's factory conditions documented in parliamentary reports Marx referenced, underscored lengthening workdays (up to 16 hours) and child labor prevalence, yielding profits amid widespread poverty. Central to the economic critique is the law of the tendential fall in the , where competition compels capitalists to invest in machinery (constant capital) over wages (variable capital), diluting extraction and precipitating crises of . Marx viewed recurrent downturns—like the 1847-1848 European crises or the 1873 —as inherent, not aberrations, contrasting with classical economists' equilibrium models. These cycles, he argued, exacerbate inequality: by 1867, British industrial capital concentration had risen, with factory employment surging from 1.5 million in 1833 to over 3 million by 1861, yet stagnated relative to productivity gains. Later Marxists, such as in Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (), extended this to modernity's global phase, positing export of capital and colonial monopolies as delays to collapse, evidenced by Europe's pre-World War I investment abroad exceeding $40 billion. Alienation emerges as a profound economic-social , where workers confront their own product as an alien power, fragmenting human potential into specialized, deskilled tasks under division of labor. Marx's 1844 Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts detailed fourfold alienation—from product, process, species-being, and fellow humans—rooted in private , critiquing modernity's promise of individual as illusory under wage slavery. This resonates in data: 20th-century assembly lines, as in Ford's 1913 model, reduced auto production time per from 12 hours to 93 minutes but correlated with repetitive strain injuries and turnover rates exceeding 370% annually. Critics note Marxism's underemphasis on adaptive mechanisms like welfare states post-1930s, which mitigated absolute immiseration—U.S. Gini coefficients fell from 0.45 in 1929 to 0.36 by 1950—yet relative inequality persists, with global billionaire wealth reaching $12.7 trillion by 2023 amid stagnant median wages in advanced economies. Frankfurt School thinkers like and Theodor Adorno, in (1947), fused Marxist economics with cultural analysis, decrying modernity's "" as commodifying leisure to sustain consumption, thus perpetuating false needs over genuine . Economically, this critiques how and —evident in U.S. rising from $77 billion in 1929 to $1.2 trillion by 1970—mask exploitation by channeling surplus into non-productive spheres. While empirical successes of , such as global poverty reduction from 42% in 1981 to under 10% by 2015, challenge predictions of inevitable downfall, Marxists counter that uneven development widens North-South gaps, with sub-Saharan Africa's GDP lagging at $1,700 versus $50,000 in as of 2020. These critiques prioritize causal mechanisms of accumulation over normative appeals, insisting modernity's economic logic sows seeds of its transcendence through proletarian organization.

Cultural and Moral Decay Arguments

Critics of modernity, including philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche and Oswald Spengler, contend that the shift away from traditional religious and metaphysical foundations toward secular rationalism and individualism fosters nihilism, defined as the devaluation of intrinsic meaning and values. Nietzsche argued that the "death of God"—the erosion of Christian belief in Western societies—leaves a void filled by passive nihilism, where individuals abandon absolute truths for subjective will, leading to cultural exhaustion. Spengler extended this in The Decline of the West (1918–1922), portraying modernity as the final, decadent phase of Western civilization, marked by materialism, urban alienation, and the loss of heroic vitality, analogous to the decay of classical civilizations. Empirical trends in support claims of moral disorientation, with Gallup International surveys showing a global drop in religious identification from 79% in 2005 to 72% in 2023, alongside a rise in convinced atheists from 6% to 10%. In the United States, Pew Research data indicate that Christian affiliation fell from 78% in 2007 to 63% in 2021, correlating with increased reports of among . Traditionalist thinkers like attribute this to modernity's rejection of hierarchical, sacred orders, resulting in egalitarian "tellurism" that prioritizes material comfort over spiritual hierarchy and exacerbates societal fragmentation. Family structures exhibit strain, with global fertility rates plummeting to 2.3 children per in 2021 from 4.9 in 1960, per estimates, below replacement levels (2.1) in over 100 countries by 2024, signaling a demographic linked to delayed and . Critics argue this reflects moral decay, as modern emphasis on personal autonomy undermines procreative norms; for instance, non-marital births rose to 40% in the U.S. by 2020, associated with higher and behavioral issues in single-parent homes. While crude rates have declined since the peak (from 5.3 per 1,000 in 1981 to 2.5 in 2022), selective stability among educated cohorts masks broader instability, with 40% of first marriages still ending in and "gray " among over-50s tripling since 1990. Social capital erosion, as documented by Robert Putnam in Bowling Alone (2000), evidences cultural atomization: U.S. membership in civic groups like PTAs and fraternal organizations halved between 1960 and 1990, with informal socializing (e.g., dinner parties) dropping 45% from 1965 to 1995 levels. Putnam links this to modernity's technological and mobility-driven , reducing trust and reciprocity essential for moral cohesion. compounds this, with experimental evidence showing exposure to relativist arguments increases by 13–20% compared to absolutist priming, suggesting weakened internal constraints on behavior. Conservative critics, wary of academia's tendency to dismiss such trends as perceptual illusions despite contradictory metrics, argue these shifts causally undermine societal resilience: low threatens civilizational continuity, while erodes judgments against vices like or once curbed by tradition. Yet, causal realism demands scrutiny; correlations with (e.g., fertility drops amid ) suggest trade-offs, not pure decay, though traditionalists counter that supplants without commensurate fulfillment.

Environmental and Sustainability Concerns

Industrialization, a hallmark of modernity since the late , has driven unprecedented but at the cost of severe , including elevated air and water pollution levels in early phases. In urban centers of 19th-century Britain, coal-fired factories and steam engines released vast quantities of soot, , and particulate matter, leading to events like the 1952 London Smog, which caused over 4,000 excess deaths due to acute respiratory issues from trapped pollutants. Similarly, water bodies in industrialized regions suffered from untreated industrial effluents and , contaminating rivers and lakes with and pathogens; for instance, the in the U.S. caught fire multiple times in the from oil and chemical accumulations. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations, stable at approximately 280 parts per million (ppm) for millennia prior to the Industrial Revolution, have risen to 422.5 ppm by 2024, a 50% increase attributable primarily to fossil fuel combustion and land-use changes associated with modern economic expansion. Global anthropogenic CO2 emissions escalated from negligible levels in 1750 to about 36 billion metric tons annually by 2022, with the sharpest growth post-1950 coinciding with widespread adoption of mechanized industry and transportation. This accumulation correlates with observed global temperature rises of about 1.1°C since pre-industrial times, prompting concerns over intensified weather extremes, sea-level rise, and ecosystem disruptions, though causal attribution remains debated amid natural variability factors. Modern and , enabled by technological advances like synthetic fertilizers and mechanized expansion, have accelerated , with over 90% of recent land-use-driven impacts stemming from crop cultivation and pastures. Species extinction rates are now estimated at 10 to 100 times background levels, largely due to ; for example, has encroached on critical ecosystems, while industrial farming has converted vast natural areas, threatening 24,000 of 28,000 assessed species through direct threats like and indirect ones like runoff. These trends underscore modernity's reliance on resource-intensive practices that prioritize yield over ecological balance. Sustainability critiques highlight finite resource stocks, with fossil fuels and minerals facing depletion risks under continued exponential demand; proven oil reserves, for instance, equate to roughly 50 years at current consumption rates, though discoveries and efficiency gains have repeatedly extended timelines. The 1972 Club of Rome report "The Limits to Growth" modeled scenarios where unchecked population and industrial expansion could exhaust key resources like metals and fuels by the mid-21st century, leading to absent policy shifts toward equilibrium. Empirical updates suggest partial alignment with "business-as-usual" projections, including stalled per-capita resource productivity amid rising , though outright has been averted thus far by substitution and —yet persistent overshoot of raises doubts about long-term viability without systemic restraints.

Global and Comparative Contexts

Adoption and Adaptation in Non-Western Societies

Japan's in 1868 marked one of the earliest and most successful instances of deliberate modernization in a non-Western society, driven by the imperative to avert Western colonization after Commodore Perry's arrival in 1853. The oligarchic government abolished feudal domains, centralized authority under the emperor, and systematically imported Western technologies, legal codes, and educational systems, achieving industrialization that propelled from agrarian isolation to defeating in 1905 and establishing colonial holdings by 1912. This adaptation preserved cultural elements like the imperial institution and practices while prioritizing pragmatic emulation of European models for military and economic strength. In , Deng Xiaoping's 1978 reforms initiated the "" in , industry, , and defense, shifting from Maoist collectivism to market-oriented policies that permitted household farming, special economic zones, and foreign investment, resulting in GDP growth averaging 10% annually from 1978 to 2010 and lifting over 800 million from poverty. Unlike full liberalization, China's model retained authoritarian control, adapting modernity through that integrated global trade while suppressing political pluralism, as evidenced by the 1989 events. This selective adoption fueled empirical gains in infrastructure and manufacturing but exacerbated inequalities and environmental degradation. Turkey under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk from 1923 pursued aggressive post-Ottoman collapse, abolishing the in 1924, adopting the Latin alphabet in 1928, granting women in 1934, and enacting civil codes modeled on Swiss and Italian law, transforming a theocratic empire into a unitary with Western-oriented institutions. These top-down reforms boosted from 10% to near-universal by mid-century and industrialized key sectors, yet faced resistance from rural and Islamist groups, leading to partial reversals under later governments. India's , prompted by a balance-of-payments , dismantled the "License Raj" through deregulation, rupee devaluation, and FDI inflows, spurring average annual GDP growth of 6-7% thereafter and expanding the from 30 million in to over 400 million by 2020. This adaptation blended democratic with market reforms, fostering IT and service sectors while preserving and religious diversities, though bureaucratic hurdles and uneven persisted. Across these cases, modernization often involved elite-driven, state-led initiatives that prioritized economic and technological uptake over wholesale cultural , yielding hybrid forms like Japan's emperor-centric or China's party-guided markets. Empirical studies highlight causal factors such as strong central and external threats enabling rapid adaptation, but also underscore challenges including social dislocations, , and clashes with indigenous norms, as seen in persistent inequalities and revivalist backlashes in and . In and the , oil-dependent states like modernized post-1970s without deep societal shifts, resulting in economic enclaves amid traditional , while many sub-Saharan efforts faltered due to weak institutions and resource curses.

Postcolonial Critiques and Responses

Postcolonial theorists contend that modernity's Enlightenment ideals of progress, rationality, and universalism originated in Europe and served as ideological justifications for colonial domination, embedding Eurocentrism in global structures. Edward Said's Orientalism (1978) argues that Western scholarship and discourse constructed non-European societies as static and inferior, enabling imperial control and perpetuating cultural hegemony even after formal decolonization. Frantz Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth (1961) extends this by portraying colonial modernity as psychologically alienating, fostering violence and dependency that require violent rupture rather than reform, as colonized minds internalize inferiority. Homi Bhabha's concept of hybridity (1994) further critiques modernity's homogenizing force, positing that colonial encounters produce ambivalent identities that undermine claims of linear progress, revealing modernity's reliance on mimicry and ambivalence rather than authentic universality. These critiques portray modernity's institutions—such as nation-states, , and scientific epistemologies—as extensions of colonial power, marginalizing indigenous knowledges and sustaining neocolonial dependencies through global trade and . However, responses highlight postcolonial theory's empirical shortcomings, including overemphasis on at the expense of material causation and verifiable outcomes. Critical realist analyses argue that while involved exploitation, modernity's frameworks enabled measurable advancements in former colonies, such as South Korea's GDP per capita surging from $158 in 1960 to $34,121 in 2022 via export-led industrialization and institutional reforms inherited and adapted from colonial-era . Similarly, India's rose from approximately 32 years at in 1947 to 69.7 in 2021, with literacy rates climbing from 12% to 77.7%, attributable to modern , education systems, and rather than rejection of Western models. Critics further note that postcolonial relativism romanticizes pre-modern non-Western societies, which frequently featured hierarchical tyrannies, intertribal warfare, and practices like and , without modernity's capacity for or . Empirical studies underscore theory's ideological biases, such as selective conceptual application and resistance to falsification, contrasting with data showing institutional quality—not anti-modern resistance—as the key driver of post-colonial prosperity. While acknowledging colonial violence, these responses emphasize causal realism: modernity's tools, when decoupled from extraction, have empirically elevated living standards globally, challenging narratives of inherent Eurocentric oppression.

Variations Across Regions

In , modernity originated with the of the 16th and 17th centuries, followed by the Enlightenment emphasis on reason and , culminating in the that began in Britain around 1760 with innovations like the and textile machinery, leading to rapid and . This process spread unevenly across the continent: Britain achieved coal-based manufacturing dominance by 1800, while and followed in the 1820s-1830s, and unified industrial efforts post-1871, fostering state-led . Protestant work ethic and legal institutions supportive of property rights facilitated this endogenous development, contrasting with absolutist monarchies elsewhere that delayed similar shifts. ![Die_protestantische_Ethik_und_der_'Geist'_des_Kapitalismus_original_cover.jpg][float-right] In , particularly the , modernity built on European foundations but accelerated through abundant land, immigration, and market-driven innovation, with the gaining momentum after 1840 via railroads and steel production, outpacing Europe's per capita output by 1900. Canada's path mirrored this but lagged due to resource extraction focus until the late . Unlike Europe's feudal legacies, settler societies emphasized constitutional liberty and entrepreneurship, enabling faster adaptation of technologies like the telegraph in 1844. Asia exhibited selective modernization, as in Japan's of 1868, which dismantled , centralized power under the , and imported Western engineering—building over 10,000 miles of railways by 1914—while preserving Shinto traditions and avoiding full cultural assimilation. China, by contrast, resisted until the 1978 economic reforms under , which lifted 800 million from poverty through but retained authoritarian control, diverging from Europe's liberal individualism. experienced British-imposed infrastructure like railways from 1853, yet post-1947 independence prioritized socialist planning, delaying market-driven growth until 1991 liberalization. Latin America's modernity derived from Iberian , featuring early urban grids and booms in the , but stalled by extractive institutions and rule, with industrialization confined to import-substitution policies from the 1930s-1970s yielding uneven results—Brazil's GDP reached Europe's 1920s levels by 1980 but faltered amid debt crises. This hybrid form incorporated indigenous and African elements, producing distinct trajectories like Mexico's 1910 Revolution, which blended secular reforms with persistent inequality, unlike Europe's bourgeois revolutions. Eastern Europe lagged due to Ottoman and Habsburg imperial constraints, achieving partial industrialization by the late —Russia's completed in 1916—but Soviet imposition from 1917 prioritized over consumer goods, enforcing collectivism that suppressed private enterprise until 1989 collapses. In the Middle East and , colonial modernity focused on raw material extraction—'s railways built post-1880s for —yielding post-independence marked by resource curses and tribal fragmentation, as oil wealth in from 1938 funded welfare states without broad secularization. These regions often prioritized modernization (technological uptake) over (individualism), leading to authoritarian modernities resistant to Europe's rationalist .

Contemporary Developments and Debates

Reflexivity and Challenges in

In , reflexivity refers to the ongoing process by which individuals and institutions continuously monitor, evaluate, and revise social practices in light of emerging knowledge and information. Sociologist , in his 1990 work The Consequences of Modernity, describes this as a hallmark of modern social life, where traditions lose their binding force and actions are informed by expert systems and abstract knowledge rather than custom alone. This reflexive orientation extends to self-identity, which Giddens argues in Modernity and Self-Identity (1991) becomes a deliberate biographical project, requiring individuals to actively construct and maintain their sense of self amid fluid social contexts. Reflexivity intensifies in due to processes like disembedding— the "lifting out" of social relations from local contexts via time-space distanciation enabled by technologies such as global communication networks—leading to heightened awareness of global interconnections. Giddens posits that this results in a "" dynamic, where modernity's momentum generates both progress and , demanding perpetual adaptation. For instance, advancements in since the have accelerated reflexivity by providing on social trends, prompting rapid institutional reforms, as seen in corporate and policy shifts responsive to economic indicators. Key challenges arise from this reflexivity, including ontological insecurity, where the erosion of traditional anchors fosters existential anxiety. Giddens notes that while reflexivity empowers agency, it also burdens individuals with responsibility for life choices in an environment of manufactured uncertainties, such as those from financial or . Complementing this, Ulrich 's Risk Society (1992) frames late modernity as dominated by "manufactured risks"—side effects of industrial progress, like nuclear accidents (e.g., Chernobyl in 1986) or — which transcend national borders and evade simple distribution, shifting focus from wealth accumulation to risk avoidance. argues these risks politicize and expertise, as public skepticism grows toward institutions perceived as risk-producers, evidenced by declining trust in regulatory bodies post-events like the 2011 Fukushima disaster. Globalization exacerbates these challenges, intertwining local lives with distant events, such as supply chain disruptions from the starting in 2019, which highlighted vulnerabilities in just-in-time economies. Individualization, another facet, compels people to navigate biographies without collective scripts, correlating with rising issues; for example, U.S. data from the show anxiety disorders affecting 19.1% of adults in 2020, up from prior decades amid reflexive pressures. and Giddens both emphasize that while reflexivity enables sub-political responses—like environmental bypassing formal politics—it risks fragmentation, as seen in polarized debates over issues like , where expert consensus clashes with lay interpretations. These dynamics underscore late modernity's tension between innovation and instability, with empirical studies indicating uneven adaptation, particularly in welfare states facing fiscal strains from demographic shifts like Europe's aging populations since the 1990s.

Transitions to Post-Modernity or Beyond

The transition to post-modernity is characterized by a perceived rupture from modernist faith in progress, universal reason, and grand narratives, emerging prominently after amid cultural disillusionment and economic shifts toward post-industrial societies. Key markers include the cultural upheavals, such as the rise of countercultural movements and , which bridged modernism's austerity with postmodern eclecticism and irony. By the 1970s, architectural and artistic experiments rejected modernist functionalism, favoring pastiche and fragmentation, as seen in works by and the adoption of ornamental styles in . Philosophically, Jean-François Lyotard's 1979 publication formalized the shift, defining post-modernity as incredulity toward metanarratives like Enlightenment rationality or Marxist historical inevitability, driven by the informatics revolution and knowledge . Economically, in 1984 described as the cultural logic of late , linking it to multinational capital's flexibility, media saturation, and spatial compression since the oil crises and neoliberal reforms. David Harvey's 1989 analysis further tied this to accelerated time-space compression, with global financial deregulation post-1971 Bretton Woods collapse enabling and simulacra over authentic production. Debates persist on whether this constitutes a true break or merely "late modernity," with scholars like and arguing continuity through reflexive institutions and risk societies, where modernist structures intensify rather than dissolve—evident in persistent and scientific advancement despite cultural relativism. Zygmunt Bauman's "liquid modernity" (2000) posits fluid, unstable social forms succeeding solid modernist hierarchies, without fully endorsing postmodern rupture. Critiques from truth-oriented perspectives highlight postmodern relativism's role in eroding objective standards, fostering epistemological traceable to Nietzschean influences but amplified in academia, potentially undermining causal analysis of empirical realities like economic inequalities or . Movements beyond post-modernity, such as since the 2010s, oscillate between modernist sincerity and postmodern irony, responding to crises like the 2008 financial meltdown and climate data imperatives demanding renewed structure amid fragmentation. The digital era's and algorithmic governance, accelerating post-1990s diffusion, challenge postmodern pluralism with data-driven realism, as seen in AI advancements prioritizing predictive accuracy over narrative —though academic sources often overstate relativist continuity due to institutional incentives. Events like the 1989 fall symbolized collapse, yet subsequent populist revivals and empirical turn in sciences suggest hybrid forms rather than pure transcendence.

Potential Revivals of Pre-Modern Elements

In response to modernity's emphasis on , , and progress, various intellectual and social movements have emerged advocating the revival of pre-modern elements, including hierarchical social orders, sacred cosmologies, and communal lifestyles rooted in tradition. The Traditionalist or Perennialist school, influential since the early 20th century through thinkers like René Guénon, critiques modernity as a deviation from timeless metaphysical principles inherent in ancient religious traditions, proposing a restoration of transcendent authority over . This perspective has gained traction among contemporary figures, such as Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin and American strategist , who draw on it to challenge liberal globalism with appeals to civilizational hierarchies and spiritual sovereignty. Religious revivals constitute another domain of potential pre-modern resurgence, with empirical data indicating growth in orthodox or fundamentalist communities despite overall secular trends in the West. Globally, has expanded by 347 million adherents from 2010 to 2020, often preserving pre-modern legal and communal structures like Sharia-based governance in adherent societies. In the West, modern pagan movements, such as those reconstructing ancient European polytheisms, have proliferated since the , with contemporary iterations emphasizing ritual ties to land and ancestry as antidotes to technological alienation; for instance, neopagan groups have reported steady increases in membership, framing their practices as authentic recoveries of pre-Christian worldviews. Among youth, surveys from 2025 highlight a turn toward traditional for identity and meaning amid cultural fragmentation, evidenced by rising participation in liturgical or ancestral religions. Politically, sentiments favoring pre-modern governance forms, such as absolute or , persist and occasionally intensify, reflecting dissatisfaction with democratic volatility. Pro-monarchy movements in the advocate restorations in nations like , , and former Habsburg territories, citing monarchy's stability and symbolic unity as superior to elective systems; polls in constitutional monarchies like the show sustained public support, with over 60% favoring retention in 2023 surveys. Integral traditionalism, an extension of Perennialism, explicitly endorses monarchical and class structures as alignments with divine order, influencing niche conservative circles. Lifestyle experiments, including intentional communities, demonstrate practical attempts to reinstitute pre-modern agrarian and kinship-based living. Ecovillages and communes, numbering in the thousands globally by 2020, prioritize shared labor, minimal , and ecological stewardship akin to pre-industrial villages, with U.S. examples like those in rural opting out of norms for self-sufficiency; membership in such groups has grown amid post-2008 economic , appealing to those seeking causal continuity with ancestral survival strategies over modern isolation. These efforts, while marginal, underscore a causal realism in recognizing modernity's disruptions to human-scale social bonds, fostering experiments that could scale under sustained crises like resource scarcity.

References

  1. https://www.dbu.edu/mitchell/early-modern-resources/modernit.html
  2. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history-art/the-enlightenment/content-section-8.4
  3. https://www.keywords.keywords2.hosting.nyu.edu/american-cultural-studies/essay/modern/
  4. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-protestant-ethic-and-the-spirit-of-capitalism-9780199747252
  5. https://www.etymonline.com/word/modernity
  6. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/modernity_n
  7. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/modernity
  8. https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/ash.20220801.12
  9. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34513/chapter/292841753
  10. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-social-theory/modernity/76FBB0D8167D3FF9D13B140478903C3E
  11. https://www.thecollector.com/what-is-max-webers-theory-of-rationalization/
  12. https://tif.ssrc.org/2020/05/01/enchantment-disenchantment-saler/
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350602151_Premodernity_Modernity_Postmodernity_and_Eu-Modernity_as_the_Four_Stages_of_Civilizational_Developmental_Psychology_Comte%27s_Parallel_Human-Civilizational_Developments
  14. https://loveofallwisdom.com/blog/2013/03/modernity-and-modernism/
  15. https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/91032/what-is-the-difference-between-modernism-and-modernity
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-literary-criticism/modernism-modernity-modernisation/7F01BE41511BBD8F7DB710BD2A045BC4
  17. https://revisesociology.com/2025/09/16/modernity-postmodernity-definitions/
  18. https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/89481/what-is-the-difference-between-modernity-and-enlightenment
  19. https://www.thelivingphilosophy.com/p/modernism-vs-postmodernism
  20. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/postmodernism/
  21. https://anthropology.ua.edu/theory/postmodernism-and-its-critics/
  22. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/secularization-and-modernization-the-failure-of-a-grand-narrative/7B7C772F14A974F07AAEC4D8A13862C8
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266662272200003X
  24. https://news.fordham.edu/arts-and-culture/modernity-not-synonymous-with-secularization-expert-says/
  25. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/secularization-the-fate-of-faith-in-modern-society/
  26. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/contemporary_sec9/1/
  27. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/students/modules/hi203/european_world_3rd_end_2018_1st_proofs.pdf
  28. https://worldhistoryedu.com/what-were-the-major-consequences-of-the-age-of-discovery/
  29. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Courses/Mizzou_Academy/World_History_A_B/11%253A_Power_of_Ideas/11.03%253A_Age_of_Discovery
  30. https://academic.oup.com/book/1768/chapter/141427886
  31. https://news.nd.edu/news/the-lasting-impact-of-martin-luther-and-the-reformation/
  32. https://www.sparknotes.com/history/scientific-revolution/
  33. https://plantspeopleplanet.au/scientific-revolution-timeline/
  34. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/
  35. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/the-age-of-enlightenment/
  36. https://www.modernreformation.org/resources/articles/the-mod-how-modern-was-the-reformation
  37. https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Europe/The-age-of-revolution
  38. https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Europe/Revolution-and-the-growth-of-industrial-society-1789-1914
  39. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/2149/chapter/248604/Introduction
  40. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-atheism/classical-modernity-social-and-political-currents/ABEEF664D8225F526B2164F8C693EE55
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272998246_Modernity
  42. https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/history/documents/2010-spring-UG-courses.pdf
  43. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-atheism/classical-modernity-philosophical-and-scientific-currents/3A758C8426F2FF65DBE65DCC6E94BF81
  44. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/foreword
  45. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/post-war-united-states-1945-1968/overview/
  46. https://education.cfr.org/learn/timeline/essential-events-1945
  47. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/whp-origins/x23c41635548726c4:globalization/x23c41635548726c4:the-great-acceleration-9-4/a/article-the-great-acceleration
  48. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/01/how-globalization-4-0-fits-into-the-history-of-globalization/
  49. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/scientific-and-technological-advances-world-war-ii
  50. https://giuseppecapograssi.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/bauman-liquid-modernity.pdf
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3786078/
  52. https://www.sup.org/books/sociology/reflexive-modernization
  53. http://www.riversimulator.org/Resources/Anthropology/RiskSociety/RiskSocietyTowardsAnewModernity1992Beck.pdf
  54. https://books.google.com/books/about/Reflexive_Modernization.html?id=KqGRmn29488C
  55. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263276403020002001
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249710405_Reinventing_Modernity_Reflexive_Modernization_vs_Liquid_Modernity_vs_Multiple_Modernities
  57. https://www.theoryculturesociety.org/blog/review-ali-rattansi-bauman-and-contemporary-sociology
  58. https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Reflexivity-and-tradition-a-critique-of-the-individualization-thesis-by-Matthew-Adams.pdf
  59. https://rupress.org/jgp/article/153/5/e202012803/211879/Is-Bauman-s-liquid-modernity-influencing-the-way
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233033950_Bauman_Beck_Giddens_and_our_understanding_of_politics_in_late_modernity
  61. https://pressbooks.pub/abriefhistory/chapter/making-connections-between-events-the-peace-of-westphalia-and-the-rise-of-the-nation-state/
  62. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-westerncivilization/chapter/the-peace-of-westphalia-and-sovereignty/
  63. https://www.usconstitution.net/enlightenments-impact-on-u-s-democracy/
  64. https://education.cfr.org/learn/reading/what-enlightenment-and-how-did-it-transform-politics
  65. https://edtechbooks.org/democracy/enlightenment
  66. https://www.history.ox.ac.uk/re-imagining-democracy-1750-1860
  67. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-world/rise-of-democracy
  68. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/countering-radical-right/totalitarianism-twentieth-century-and-beyond/
  69. https://www.ned.org/docs/Samuel-P-Huntington-Democracy-Third-Wave.pdf
  70. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/modernization-and-politics/521F1D15D3242269F082F7B69E5A3584
  71. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mercantilism.asp
  72. https://jfrieden.scholars.harvard.edu/file_url/385
  73. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~jsteinsson/papers/malthus.pdf
  74. https://fiveable.me/ap-world/unit-5/economic-developments-1750-1900/study-guide/Yeve79K0RYXF9JSuVHxb
  75. https://www.ushistory.org/us/22a.asp
  76. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/industrialization-labor-and-life/
  77. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2000/wp0044.pdf
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2781831/
  79. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview
  80. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-evolution-of-global-poverty-1990-2030/
  81. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/the-scientific-revolution/
  82. https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/scientific-revolution-ideas-inventions
  83. https://web.colby.edu/st112a-fall20/2020/09/12/how-the-scientific-revolution-changed-thought/
  84. https://www.historyhit.com/key-inventions-of-the-industrial-revolution/
  85. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/industrial-revolution-and-technology/
  86. https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter1/emergence-of-mechanized-transportation-systems/industrial-revolution-technological-innovations/
  87. https://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/inventions/5-industrial-revolution-inventions.htm
  88. https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/284158.html
  89. https://stories.state.gov/american-inventions/
  90. https://hms.harvard.edu/about-hms/history-hms/timeline-discovery
  91. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/station/20-breakthroughs-from-20-years-of-science-aboard-the-international-space-station/
  92. https://www.energy.gov/articles/75-breakthroughs-americas-national-laboratories-0
  93. https://www.britannica.com/topic/disenchantment-sociology
  94. https://revisesociology.com/2018/08/23/secularization-rationalization-desacrilization/
  95. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/06/09/religion-in-europe/
  96. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/12/14/about-three-in-ten-u-s-adults-are-now-religiously-unaffiliated/
  97. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/02/26/decline-of-christianity-in-the-us-has-slowed-may-have-leveled-off/
  98. https://e3.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1089538
  99. https://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion/vol11/iss1/3/
  100. http://thecresset.org/2014/Lent/Thuswaldner_L14.html
  101. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/
  102. https://www.amazon.com/Desecularization-World-Resurgent-Religion-Politics/dp/0802846912
  103. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes-epistemology/
  104. https://iep.utm.edu/rene-descartes/
  105. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/
  106. https://philosophybreak.com/articles/john-lockes-empiricism-why-we-are-all-tabula-rasas-blank-slates/
  107. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/
  108. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/
  109. https://www.artelino.com/articles/modern_art_periods.asp
  110. https://www.contemporaryartissue.com/the-history-of-modern-contemporary-art-movements/
  111. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/modernist-literature-guide
  112. https://study.com/learn/lesson/modernism-literature-characteristics-movement-examples.html
  113. https://chromatone.center/theory/composition/serialism/
  114. https://fiveable.me/music-theory-and-composition/unit-11/atonality-serialism/study-guide/8IfOYLacGprRrgzY
  115. https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/modernist-architecture-the-bauhaus-and-beyond
  116. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/international-style/
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266662272500022X?via%253Dihub
  118. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314236976_Global_Increases_in_Individualism
  119. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/columns/higher-ed-gamma/2024/09/26/how-individualism-transformed-western-societies
  120. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=orpc
  121. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/edvol/british-social-attitudes-the-24th-report/chpt/new-families-tradition-change-modern-relationships
  122. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4706588/
  123. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/351326/continuing-change-views-sex-marriage.aspx
  124. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~groland/pubs/Deephistoricalroots.pdf
  125. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5591862/
  126. https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy-globally
  127. https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy-increased-in-all-countries-of-the-world
  128. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/420236/Global_Extreme_Poverty.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  129. https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty-in-brief
  130. https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality-in-the-past
  131. https://bigthink.com/health/child-mortality-progress/
  132. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/wld/world/electricity-access-statistics
  133. https://visualizingenergy.org/world-electricity-generation-since-1900/
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8958826/
  135. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/global-sanitary-revolution-historical-perspective
  136. https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/citation_file_upload/Bekaert-CaloricConsumptionIndustrializing-1991.pdf
  137. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-project-database
  138. https://www.card.iastate.edu/research/science-and-technology/papers/Mokyr-October-03.pdf
  139. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2018/06/impact-of-science-and-technology-on-global-economic-growth-mokyr
  140. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/01/fourth-industrial-revolution-massive-productivity-boom-good/
  141. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-average-gdp-per-capita-over-the-long-run
  142. https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy
  143. https://phrma.org/blog/study-finds-biopharmaceutical-innovation-is-responsible-for-35-of-the-increase-in-life-expectancy-from-1990-to-2015
  144. https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/broughel-technological-innovation-mercatus-research-v1.pdf
  145. https://polsci.institute/human-security/historical-evolution-human-rights-milestones-impact/
  146. https://www.heritage.org/civil-rights/commentary/brief-history-individual-rights
  147. https://www.elysee.fr/en/french-presidency/the-declaration-of-the-rights-of-man-and-of-the-citizen
  148. https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/who-human
  149. https://www.britannica.com/summary/Abolitionism-Timeline
  150. https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/woman-suffrage
  151. https://www.britannica.com/topic/woman-suffrage
  152. https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/universal-declaration-of-human-rights/
  153. https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/universal-declaration-human-rights-75-our-shared-values-and-path-solutions
  154. https://ia801200.us.archive.org/20/items/EvolaFR/JuliusEvola-renGunon_ATeacherForModernTimes.pdf
  155. https://toomuchberard.com/2021/01/21/review-guenon-the-age-of-quantity-and-the-signs-of-the-times/
  156. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/10/books/connections-those-who-were-inspired-to-hate-the-modern-world.html
  157. https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/the-conservative-mind-russell-kirk
  158. https://modernagejournal.com/the-mind-behind-the-conservative-mind/217983/
  159. https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/blame-the-fathers/
  160. https://www.rogerscruton.com/images/The_Fabric_of_the_City.pdf
  161. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2023/01/roger-scruton-aesthetics-architecture-christopher-morrissey.html
  162. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/
  163. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Marxism.html
  164. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21598282.2023.2296167
  165. https://newpol.org/issue_post/marx-and-weber-critics-capitalism/
  166. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/columns/higher-ed-gamma/2024/10/30/marxs-diagnosis-capitalism-clear-his-analysis-outdated
  167. https://ia801404.us.archive.org/33/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.273076/2015.273076.Critical-Theory_text.pdf
  168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/488362
  169. https://brill.com/view/journals/fhic/7/3/article-p330_2.pdf
  170. https://iep.utm.edu/nihilism/
  171. https://gallup-international.com/survey-results-and-news/survey-result/two-decades-of-change-global-religiosity-declines-while-atheism-rises
  172. https://orthosphere.wordpress.com/2018/05/07/against-nihilism-julius-evolas-traditionalist-critique-of-modernity/
  173. https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/newsroom/news-releases/lancet-dramatic-declines-global-fertility-rates-set-transform
  174. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4240051/
  175. https://ifstudies.org/blog/divorce-in-decline-about-40-of-todays-marriages-will-end-in-divorce
  176. https://www.purdue.edu/hhs/news/2025/03/purdue-expert-overall-divorce-rates-lowest-in-decades-but-gray-divorce-soars/
  177. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/bowling-alone-americas-declining-social-capital/
  178. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/16643
  179. https://reasoninglab.psych.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/273/2021/04/Rai_Holyoak.2013.pdf
  180. https://modernagejournal.com/conservative-critics-of-modernity/247367/
  181. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06137-x
  182. https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty_pages/romain.wacziarg/downloads/2022_fertility.pdf
  183. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/tutorial_pollution/02history.html
  184. https://www.history.com/articles/water-and-air-pollution
  185. https://greenly.earth/en-us/blog/ecology-news/what-was-the-industrial-revolutions-environmental-impact
  186. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide
  187. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025/co2-emissions
  188. https://visualizingenergy.org/global-anthropogenic-emissions-of-carbon-dioxide-1750-2022/
  189. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  190. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions
  191. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01433-4
  192. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/biodiversity
  193. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/our-global-food-system-primary-driver-biodiversity-loss
  194. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7341033/
  195. https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-limits-to-growth/
  196. https://donellameadows.org/archives/a-synopsis-limits-to-growth-the-30-year-update/
  197. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/japan_1750_meiji.htm
  198. https://japansociety.org/news/the-meiji-restoration-era-1868-1889/
  199. https://www.cato.org/publications/chinas-post-1978-economic-development-entry-global-trading-system
  200. https://orcasia.org/1978-reforms-and-the-four-modernisations
  201. https://tcf.org/content/report/turkeys-troubled-experiment-secularism/
  202. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/twenty-five-years-indian-economic-reform
  203. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302466440_The_Modernization_of_Non-Western_Societies_A_Perspective_of_Constructive_Realism
  204. https://issues.org/pack/
  205. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1558/jcr.v9i3.299
  206. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X97000120
  207. https://www.workersliberty.org/story/2023-12-31/critical-notes-postcolonial-theory
  208. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00208817221142485
  209. https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/colonial-origins-of-comparative-development.pdf
  210. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/economic-impact-colonialism
  211. https://www.britannica.com/event/Industrial-Revolution
  212. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-4446.12144
  213. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/rise-of-industrial-america-1876-1900/overview/
  214. https://www.britannica.com/event/Meiji-Restoration
  215. https://english.news.cn/20230706/0561888a089e467fb28263dd06a38d91/c.html
  216. https://www2.kokugakuin.ac.jp/ijcc/wp/cimac/hirai.html
  217. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-24562011000100009
  218. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262458341_Modernization_Theory_Revisited_Latin_America_Europe_and_the_US_in_the_Nineteenth_and_Early_Twentieth_Century
  219. https://china-cee.eu/2025/07/08/the-historical-process-of-modernization-in-central-and-eastern-european-countries-and-its-influencing-factors/
  220. https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0323.12.pdf
  221. https://ohiostate.pressbooks.pub/key2mideast/chapter/westernization-modernization/
  222. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1873&context=ccr
  223. https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The-Consequences-of-Modernity-by-Anthony-Giddens.pdf
  224. https://revisesociology.com/2016/03/28/giddens-modernity-and-self-identity/
  225. https://bgsp.edu/app/uploads/2014/12/Giddens-Reflexivity-of-Modernity.pdf
  226. https://puresociology.com/trajectory-of-modernity-anthony-giddens/
  227. https://www.simonspawforthjones.co.uk/theory/self-reflexivity
  228. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/risk-society
  229. https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/socp2/chapter/modernity-risk-and-reflexivity-ulrich-beck/
  230. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23254823.2022.2033461
  231. https://www.history.com/articles/history-of-modernism-and-post-modernism
  232. https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/what-is-postmodernism
  233. https://web.education.wisc.edu/halverson/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2012/12/jameson.pdf
  234. https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-252
  235. https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/92727/postmodernity-versus-late-or-liquid-modernity
  236. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7527490/
  237. https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/votupm/what_is_modernism_postmodernism_and/
  238. https://krisispraxis.com/archives/2007/11/postmodernity-and-the-crisis-of-truth/
  239. https://www.newstatesman.com/ideas/2020/10/rise-traditionalists-how-mystical-doctrine-reshaping-right
  240. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/06/09/how-the-global-religious-landscape-changed-from-2010-to-2020/
  241. https://antigonejournal.com/2024/10/pagan-revivals/
  242. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/religious-revival-why-young-people-around-world-are-finding-faith-again
  243. http://maplemonarchists.weebly.com/blog/which-country-will-be-the-first-to-restore-its-monarchy-in-the-21st-century
  244. https://slll.cass.anu.edu.au/news/long-live-king-why-monarchy-still-popular-21st-century
  245. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/16/t-magazine/intentional-communities.html
  246. https://www.lowimpact.org/posts/life-in-an-intentional-community-a-better-and-more-sustainable-way-to-live/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.