Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Nature
View on Wikipedia

Nature is an inherent character or constitution,[1] particularly of the ecosphere or the universe as a whole. In this general sense nature refers to the laws, elements and phenomena of the physical world, including life. Although humans are part of nature, human activity or humans as a whole are often described as at times at odds, or outright separate and even superior to nature.[2]
During the advent of modern scientific method in the last several centuries, nature became the passive reality, organized and moved by divine laws.[3][4] With the Industrial Revolution, nature increasingly became seen as the part of reality deprived from intentional intervention: it was hence considered as sacred by some traditions (Rousseau, American transcendentalism) or a mere decorum for divine providence or human history (Hegel, Marx). However, a vitalist vision of nature, closer to the pre-Socratic one, got reborn at the same time, especially after Charles Darwin.[2]
Within the various uses of the word today, "nature" often refers to geology and wildlife. Nature can refer to the general realm of living beings, and in some cases to the processes associated with inanimate objects—the way that particular types of things exist and change of their own accord, such as the weather and geology of the Earth. It is often taken to mean the "natural environment" or wilderness—wild animals, rocks, forest, and in general those things that have not been substantially altered by human intervention, or which persist despite human intervention. For example, manufactured objects and human interaction generally are not considered part of nature, unless qualified as, for example, "human nature" or "the whole of nature". This more traditional concept of natural things that can still be found today implies a distinction between the natural and the artificial, with the artificial being understood as that which has been brought into being by a human consciousness or a human mind. Depending on the particular context, the term "natural" might also be distinguished from the unnatural or the supernatural.[2]
Etymology
[edit]The word nature is borrowed from the Old French nature and is derived from the Latin word natura, or "essential qualities, innate disposition", and in ancient times, literally meant "birth".[5] In ancient philosophy, natura is mostly used as the Latin translation of the Greek word physis (φύσις), which originally related to the intrinsic characteristics of plants, animals, and other features of the world to develop of their own accord.[6][7] The concept of nature as a whole, the physical universe, is one of several expansions of the original notion;[2] it began with certain core applications of the word φύσις by pre-Socratic philosophers (though this word had a dynamic dimension then, especially for Heraclitus), and has steadily gained currency ever since.[8]
Earth
[edit]−13 — – −12 — – −11 — – −10 — – −9 — – −8 — – −7 — – −6 — – −5 — – −4 — – −3 — – −2 — – −1 — – 0 — |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Earth is the only planet known to support life, and its natural features are the subject of many fields of scientific research. Within the Solar System, it is third closest to the Sun; it is the largest terrestrial (rocky) planet and the fifth largest overall.[9] Its most prominent climatic features are its two large polar regions, two relatively narrow temperate zones, and a wide equatorial tropical to subtropical region.[10] Precipitation varies widely with location, from several metres of water per year to less than a millimetre.[11] 71 percent of the Earth's surface is covered by salt-water oceans. The remainder consists of continents and islands, with a majority of the inhabited land in the Northern Hemisphere.[12]
Earth has evolved through geological and biological processes that have left few traces of the original conditions.[13] The outer surface is divided into several gradually migrating tectonic plates.[14] The interior remains active, with a thick layer of plastic mantle and an iron-filled core that generates a magnetic field. This iron core is composed of a solid inner phase, and a fluid outer phase. Convective motion in the outer core generates electric currents through dynamo action, and these, in turn, generate the geomagnetic field.[15]
The atmospheric conditions have been significantly altered from the original conditions by the presence of life-forms,[16] which create an ecological balance that stabilizes the surface conditions. Despite the wide regional variations in climate by latitude and other geographic factors, the long-term average global climate is quite stable during interglacial periods,[17] and variations of a degree or two of average global temperature have historically had major effects on the ecological balance, and on the actual geography of the Earth.[18][19]
Geology
[edit]Geology is the science and study of the solid and liquid matter that constitutes the Earth. The field of geology encompasses the study of the composition, structure, physical properties, dynamics, and history of Earth materials, and the processes by which they are formed, moved, and changed. The field is a major academic discipline, and is also important for mineral and hydrocarbon extraction, knowledge about and mitigation of natural hazards, some Geotechnical engineering fields, and understanding past climates and environments.[20]
Geological evolution
[edit]
The geology of an area evolves through time as rock units are deposited and inserted and deformational processes change their shapes and locations.
Rock units are first emplaced either by deposition onto the surface or intrude into the overlying rock. Deposition can occur when sediments settle onto the surface of the Earth and later lithify into sedimentary rock, or when as volcanic material such as volcanic ash or lava flows, blanket the surface. Igneous intrusions such as batholiths, laccoliths, dikes, and sills, push upwards into the overlying rock, and crystallize as they intrude.[21][22]
After the initial sequence of rocks has been deposited, the rock units can be deformed and/or metamorphosed. Deformation typically occurs as a result of horizontal shortening, horizontal extension, or side-to-side (strike-slip) motion. These structural regimes broadly relate to convergent boundaries, divergent boundaries, and transform boundaries, respectively, between tectonic plates.[21][22]
Historical perspective
[edit]
Earth is estimated to have formed 4.54 billion years ago from the solar nebula, along with the Sun and other planets.[23] The Moon formed roughly 20 million years later. Initially molten, the outer layer of the Earth cooled, resulting in the solid crust. Outgassing and volcanic activity produced the primordial atmosphere. Condensing water vapor, most or all of which came from ice delivered by comets, produced the oceans and other water sources.[24] The highly energetic chemistry is believed to have produced a self-replicating molecule around 4 billion years ago.[25]

Continents formed, then broke up and reformed as the surface of Earth reshaped over hundreds of millions of years, occasionally combining to make a supercontinent. Roughly 750 million years ago, the earliest known supercontinent Rodinia, began to break apart. The continents later recombined to form Pannotia which broke apart about 540 million years ago, then finally Pangaea, which broke apart about 180 million years ago.[27]
During the Neoproterozoic era, freezing temperatures covered much of the Earth in glaciers and ice sheets. This hypothesis has been termed the "Snowball Earth", and it is of particular interest as it precedes the Cambrian explosion in which multicellular life forms began to proliferate about 530–540 million years ago.[28]
Since the Cambrian explosion there have been five distinctly identifiable mass extinctions.[29] The last mass extinction occurred some 66 million years ago, when a meteorite collision probably triggered the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs and other large reptiles, but spared small animals such as mammals. Over the past 66 million years, mammalian life diversified.[30]
Several million years ago, a species of small African ape gained the ability to stand upright.[26] The subsequent advent of human life, and the development of agriculture and further civilization allowed humans to affect the Earth more rapidly than any previous life form, impacting both the nature and quantity of other organisms as well as global climate.[31] By comparison, the Great Oxygenation Event, produced by the proliferation of algae during the Siderian period, required about 400 million years to culminate.[32]
The present era is classified as part of a mass extinction event, the Holocene extinction event, the fastest ever to have occurred.[33][34] Some, such as E. O. Wilson of Harvard University, predict that human destruction of the biosphere could cause the extinction of one-half of all species in the next 100 years.[35] The extent of the current extinction event is still being researched, debated and calculated by biologists.[36][37][38]
Atmosphere, climate, and weather
[edit]
The Earth's atmosphere is a key factor in sustaining the ecosystem. The thin layer of gases that envelops the Earth is held in place by gravity. Air is mostly nitrogen, oxygen, water vapor, with much smaller amounts of carbon dioxide, argon, etc.[39]: 258 The atmospheric pressure and density declines steadily with altitude.[40] The ozone layer plays an important role in depleting the amount of ultraviolet (UV) radiation that reaches the surface. As DNA is readily damaged by UV light, this serves to protect life at the surface.[41] The atmosphere also retains heat during the night, thereby reducing the daily temperature extremes.[42]
Terrestrial weather occurs almost exclusively in the lower part of the atmosphere, and serves as a convective system for redistributing heat.[43] Weather is a chaotic system that is readily modified by small changes to the environment, so accurate weather forecasting is limited to only a few days.[44] Weather is also influenced by the seasons, which result from the Earth's axis being tilted relative to its orbital plane. Thus, at any given time during the summer or winter, one part of the Earth is more directly exposed to the rays of the sun. This exposure alternates as the Earth revolves in its orbit. At any given time, regardless of season, the Northern and Southern Hemispheres experience opposite seasons.[45]

Weather can have both beneficial and harmful effects. Lightning strikes can cause wildfires, while heavy rain can cause flooding and mud slides. Extremes in weather, such as tornadoes or hurricanes and cyclones, can expend large amounts of energy along their paths, and produce devastation.[46] Surface vegetation has evolved a dependence on the seasonal variation of the weather,[47] and sudden changes lasting only a few years can have a stress effect on the plants.[48] These pose a threat to the animals that depend on its growth for their food.
Climate is a measure of the long-term trends in the weather. Various factors are known to influence the climate, including ocean currents, surface albedo, greenhouse gases, variations in the solar luminosity, and changes to the Earth's orbit.[49] Based on historical and geological records, the Earth is known to have undergone drastic climate changes in the past, including ice ages.[50] In the present day, two things are happening worldwide: (1) temperature is increasing on the average; and (2) regional climates have been undergoing noticeable changes.[51]
Ocean currents are an important factor in determining climate, particularly the major underwater thermohaline circulation which distributes heat energy from the equatorial oceans to the polar regions. These currents help to moderate the differences in temperature between winter and summer in the temperate zones. Also, without the redistributions of heat energy by the ocean currents and atmosphere, the tropics would be much hotter, and the polar regions much colder.[52]
The climate of a region depends on a number of factors, including topology, prevailing winds, proximity to a large body of water,[53] and especially latitude. A latitudinal band of the surface with similar climatic attributes forms a climate region. There are a number of such regions, ranging from the tropical climate at the equator to the polar climate in the northern and southern extremes. The latter regions are typically below the freezing temperature of water for much of the year, which can allow frozen water to accumulate in ice caps and thereby changing the surface albedo.[54]
Water on Earth
[edit]
Water is a chemical substance that is composed of hydrogen and oxygen (H2O) and is vital for all known forms of life.[55] In typical usage, "water" refers only to its liquid form, but it also has a solid state, ice, and a gaseous state, water vapor, or steam. Water covers 71% of the Earth's surface.[56] On Earth, it is found mostly in oceans and other large bodies of water, with 1.6% of water below ground in aquifers and 0.001% in the air as vapor, clouds, and precipitation.[57][58] Oceans hold 96.5% of surface water; glaciers and polar ice caps, 2.4%; and other land surface water such as rivers, lakes, ponds, underground aquifers, and groundwater, 1%. The smallest freshwater reserve is the 0.1% in the atmosphere.[59] Through subduction processes in the Earth's crust, an equivalent mass of the planet's surface water has been interred in the upper mantle alone.[60]
Oceans
[edit]
An ocean is a major body of saline water, and a principal component of the hydrosphere. Approximately 71% of the Earth's surface (an area of some 361 million square kilometers) is covered by ocean, a continuous body of water that is customarily divided into several principal oceans and smaller seas. More than half of this area is over 3,000 meters (9,800 feet) deep. Average oceanic salinity is around 35 parts per thousand (ppt) (3.5%), and nearly all seawater has a salinity in the range of 30 to 38 ppt. Though generally recognized as several 'separate' oceans, these waters comprise one global, interconnected body of salt water often referred to as the World Ocean or global ocean.[61][62] This is a fundamental concept in oceanography: a global-spanning ocean that functions as a continuous body of water with relatively free interchange among its bodies.[63]
The major oceanic divisions are determined by the various continents, archipelagos, and other criteria. In descending order of size, they are the Pacific Ocean, the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean, the Southern Ocean, and the Arctic Ocean. Smaller regions of the oceans are called seas, gulfs, bays and other names. There are also salt lakes, which are smaller bodies of landlocked saltwater that are not interconnected with the World Ocean. Two notable examples of salt lakes are the Great Salt Lake and the Caspian Sea.[64][65] No other planet in the Solar System has surface oceans, although there are 15 moons that are suspected of having ice-covered oceans.[66]
Lakes and ponds
[edit]
A lake (from Latin word lacus) is a terrain feature (or physical feature), a body of liquid on the surface of a world that is localized to the bottom of basin (another type of landform or terrain feature; that is, it is not global) and moves slowly if it moves at all. On Earth, a body of water is considered a lake when it is inland, not part of the ocean, is larger and deeper than a pond, and is fed by a river.[67][68]
The only world other than Earth known to harbor lakes is Titan, Saturn's largest moon, which has lakes of ethane, most likely mixed with methane. It is not known if Titan's lakes are fed by rivers, though Titan's surface is carved by numerous river beds.[69] Natural lakes on Earth are generally found in mountainous areas, rift zones, and areas with ongoing or recent glaciation. Other lakes are found in endorheic basins, along the courses of mature rivers, or human-made reservoirs behind dams. In some parts of the world, there are many lakes because of chaotic drainage patterns left over from the last ice age.[70] All lakes are temporary over geologic time scales, as they will slowly fill in with sediments or spill out of the basin containing them.[71]

Small bodies of standing water, typically less than 2 Hectare, are termed a pond or pool. They can be natural or human-made.[72] A wide variety of human-made bodies of water are classified as ponds, including water gardens designed for aesthetic ornamentation,[73] fish ponds designed for commercial fish breeding,[74] and solar ponds designed to store thermal energy.[75] Ponds and lakes are distinguished from streams via current speed. While currents in streams are easily observed, ponds possess thermally driven micro-currents and moderate wind driven currents.[76] These features distinguish a pond from many other aquatic terrain features, such as stream pools and tide pools.[citation needed]
Rivers and streams
[edit]
A river is a natural watercourse,[77] usually freshwater, flowing towards an ocean, a lake, a sea or another river. In a few cases, a river simply flows into the ground or dries up completely before reaching another body of water. A river is part of the hydrological cycle. Water within a river is generally collected from precipitation through surface runoff, groundwater recharge, springs, and the release of stored water in natural ice and snowpacks (i.e., from glaciers). Where a river merges with a slow-moving body of water, the deposited sedimentation can build up to form a delta.[78][79]

There is no general rule that defines what can be called a river. Smaller scale water flows with a steady current are termed a stream, creek, brook, rivulet, or rill.[79] These are confined within a stream bed and bank. Many names for small rivers are specific to geographic location; one example is Burn in Scotland and North-east England. In US naming, sometimes a river is said to be larger than a creek, but this is not always the case, due to vagueness in the language; consequently the US Geographic Names Information System calls all "linear flowing bodies of water" streams.[80]
Streams are important as conduits in the water cycle, instruments in groundwater recharge, and they serve as corridors for fish and wildlife migration. The biological habitat in the immediate vicinity of a stream is called a riparian zone.[81] Given the status of the ongoing Holocene extinction, streams play an important corridor role in connecting fragmented habitats and thus in conserving biodiversity.[82] The study of streams and waterways in general involves many branches of inter-disciplinary natural science and engineering, including hydrology, fluvial geomorphology, aquatic ecology, fish biology, riparian ecology, and others.[83]
Ecosystems
[edit]Ecosystems are composed of a variety of biotic and abiotic components that function in an interrelated way.[85] The structure and composition is determined by various environmental factors that are interrelated. Variations of these factors will initiate dynamic modifications to the ecosystem. Some of the more important components are soil, atmosphere, radiation from the sun, water, and living organisms.[86]
Central to the ecosystem concept is the idea that living organisms interact with every other element in their local environment. Eugene Odum, a founder of ecology, stated: "Any unit that includes all of the organisms (i.e.: the "community") in a given area interacting with the physical environment so that a flow of energy leads to clearly defined trophic structure, biotic diversity, and material cycles (i.e.: exchange of materials between living and nonliving parts) within the system is an ecosystem."[87] Within the ecosystem, species are connected and dependent upon one another in the food chain, and exchange energy and matter between themselves as well as with their environment.[88] The human ecosystem concept is based on the human/nature dichotomy and the idea that all species are ecologically dependent on each other, as well as with the abiotic constituents of their biotope.[89]
A smaller unit of size is called a microecosystem. For example, a microsystem can be a stone and all the life under it. A macroecosystem might involve a whole ecoregion, with its drainage basin.[90]
Wilderness
[edit]Wilderness is generally defined as areas that have not been significantly modified by human activity. Wilderness areas can be found in preserves, estates, farms, conservation preserves, ranches, national forests, national parks, and even in urban areas along rivers, gulches, or otherwise undeveloped areas. Wilderness areas and protected parks are considered important for the survival of certain species, ecological studies, conservation, and solitude. Some nature writers believe wilderness areas are vital for the human spirit and creativity,[91] and some ecologists consider wilderness areas to be an integral part of the Earth's self-sustaining natural ecosystem (the biosphere). They may also preserve historic genetic traits and that they provide habitat for wild flora and fauna that may be difficult or impossible to recreate in zoos, arboretums, or laboratories.[92]
Life
[edit]−4500 — – — – −4000 — – — – −3500 — – — – −3000 — – — – −2500 — – — – −2000 — – — – −1500 — – — – −1000 — – — – −500 — – — – 0 — |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||

Although there is no universal agreement on the definition of life, scientists generally accept that the biological manifestation of life is characterized by organization, metabolism, growth, adaptation, response to stimuli, and reproduction.[93] Life may also be said to be simply the characteristic state of organisms. The latter can then be defined in terms of biochemistry, genetics, or thermodynamics.[94] Properties common to terrestrial organisms (plants, animals, fungi, protists, archaea, and bacteria) are that they are cellular and based on a complex chemical organization. However, not every definition of life considers these properties to be essential. Human-made analogs of life may also be considered to be life.[95]
Present day organisms from viruses to humans possess a self-replicating informational molecule (genome), either DNA or RNA (as in some viruses), and such an informational molecule is probably intrinsic to life. It is likely that the earliest forms of life were based on a self-replicating informational molecule (genome), perhaps RNA[96][97] or a molecule more primitive than RNA or DNA.[98] The specific nucleotide sequence in each organism contains information that functions to promotes survival, reproduction, and the capacity to acquire resources necessary for reproduction; such sequences probably emerged early in the evolution of life.[99] Survival functions present early in the evolution of life likely also included genomic sequences that promote the avoidance of damage to the self-replicating molecule and also the capability to repair such damages that do occur. Repair of some genome damages may have involved using information from another similar molecule by a process of recombination (a primitive form of sexual interaction).[100]
The biosphere is the part of Earth's outer shell—including land, surface rocks, water, air and the atmosphere—within which life occurs, and which biotic processes in turn alter or transform. From the broadest geophysiological point of view, the biosphere is the global ecological system integrating all living beings and their relationships, including their interaction with the elements of the lithosphere (rocks), hydrosphere (water), and atmosphere (air).[101] The entire Earth contains over 75 billion tons (150 trillion pounds or about 6.8×1013 kilograms) of biomass (life), which lives within various environments within the biosphere.[102]
Over nine-tenths of the total biomass on Earth is plant life, on which animal life depends very heavily for its existence.[103] More than 2 million species of plant and animal life have been identified to date,[104] and estimates of the actual number of existing species range from several million to well over 50 million.[105][106][107] The number of individual species of life is constantly in some degree of flux, with new species appearing and others ceasing to exist on a continual basis.[108][109] The total number of species is in rapid decline.[110][111][112]
Evolution
[edit]
The origin of life on Earth is not well understood, but it is known to have occurred at least 3.5 billion years ago,[115][116][117] during the hadean or archean eons on a primordial Earth that had a substantially different environment than is found at present.[118] These life forms possessed the basic traits of self-replication and inheritable traits. Once life had appeared, the process of evolution by natural selection resulted in the development of ever-more diverse life forms.[119]
Species that were unable to adapt to the changing environment and competition from other life forms became extinct. However, the fossil record retains evidence of many of these older species. Current fossil and DNA evidence shows that all existing species can trace a continual ancestry back to the first primitive life forms.[118]
When basic forms of plant life developed the process of photosynthesis the sun's energy could be harvested to create conditions which allowed for more complex life forms.[120] The resultant oxygen accumulated in the atmosphere and gave rise to the ozone layer. The incorporation of smaller cells within larger ones resulted in the development of yet more complex cells called eukaryotes.[121] Cells within colonies became increasingly specialized, resulting in true multicellular organisms. With the ozone layer absorbing harmful ultraviolet radiation, life colonized the land surface of Earth.
Microbes
[edit]
The first form of life to develop on the Earth were unicellular, and they remained the only form of life until about a billion years ago when multi-cellular organisms began to appear.[122] Microorganisms or microbes are microscopic, and smaller than the human eye can see.[123] Microorganisms can be single-celled, such as Bacteria, Archaea, many Protista, and a minority of Fungi.[124]
These life forms are found in almost every location on the Earth where there is liquid water, including in the Earth's interior.[125] Their reproduction is both rapid and profuse. The combination of a high mutation rate and a horizontal gene transfer[126] ability makes them highly adaptable, and able to survive in new and sometimes very harsh environments, including outer space.[127] They form an essential part of the planetary ecosystem. However, some microorganisms are pathogenic and can post health risk to other organisms.
Viruses are infectious agents, but they are not autonomous life forms, as it is the case for viroids, satellites, DPIs and prions.[128]
Plants and animals
[edit]

Originally Aristotle divided all living things between plants, which generally do not move fast enough for humans to notice, and animals. In Linnaeus' system, these became the kingdoms Vegetabilia (later Plantae) and Animalia.[129] Since then, it has become clear that the Plantae as originally defined included several unrelated groups, and the fungi and several groups of algae were removed to new kingdoms.[130] However, these are still often considered plants in many contexts. Bacterial life is sometimes included in flora,[131][132] and some classifications use the term bacterial flora separately from plant flora.
Among the many ways of classifying plants are by regional floras,[133] which, depending on the purpose of study, can also include fossil flora, remnants of plant life from a previous era, including pollen.[134] People in many regions and countries take great pride in their individual arrays of characteristic flora, which can vary widely across the globe due to differences in climate and terrain.
Regional floras commonly are divided into categories such as native flora or agricultural and garden flora. Some types of "native flora" actually have been introduced centuries ago by people migrating from one region or continent to another, and become an integral part of the native, or natural flora of the place to which they were introduced. These invasive species are examples of how human interaction with the ecosystem can blur the boundary of what is considered nature.[135]
Another category of plant has historically been carved out for weeds. Though the term has fallen into disfavor among botanists as a formal way to categorize "useless" plants, the informal use of the word "weeds" to describe those plants that are deemed worthy of elimination is illustrative of the general tendency of people and societies to seek to alter or shape the course of nature.[135] Similarly, animals are often categorized in ways such as domestic, laboratory, farm animals, wild animals, pests, etc. according to their relationship to human life.[136]
Animals as a category have several characteristics that generally set them apart from other living things. Animals are eukaryotic and usually multicellular, which separates them from bacteria, archaea, and most protists. They are heterotrophic, generally digesting food in an internal chamber, which separates them from plants and algae. They are also distinguished from plants, algae, and fungi by lacking cell walls.[137]
With a few exceptions—most notably the two phyla consisting of sponges and placozoans[138]—animals have bodies that are differentiated into tissues. These include muscles, which are able to contract and control locomotion, and a nervous system, which sends and processes signals. There is also typically an internal digestive chamber.[139] The eukaryotic cells possessed by all animals are surrounded by a characteristic extracellular matrix composed of collagen and elastic glycoproteins. This may be calcified to form structures like shells, bones, and spicules, a framework upon which cells can move about and be reorganized during development and maturation, and which supports the complex anatomy required for mobility.[citation needed]
Human interrelationship
[edit]−10 — – −9 — – −8 — – −7 — – −6 — – −5 — – −4 — – −3 — – −2 — – −1 — – 0 — |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Human impact
[edit]Although humans comprise a minuscule proportion of the total living biomass on Earth, the human effect on nature is disproportionately large. Because of the extent of human influence, the boundaries between what humans regard as nature and "made environments" is not clear cut except at the extremes. Even at the extremes, the amount of natural environment that is free of discernible human influence is diminishing at an increasingly rapid pace. A 2020 study published in Nature found that anthropogenic mass (human-made materials) outweighs all living biomass on earth, with plastic alone exceeding the mass of all land and marine animals combined.[140] And according to a 2021 study published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, only about 3% of the planet's terrestrial surface is ecologically and faunally intact, with a low human footprint and healthy populations of native animal species.[141][142] Philip Cafaro, professor of philosophy at the School of Global Environmental Sustainability at Colorado State University, wrote in 2022 that "the cause of global biodiversity loss is clear: other species are being displaced by a rapidly growing human economy."[143]
The development of technology by the human race has allowed the greater exploitation of natural resources[144] and has helped to alleviate some of the risk from natural hazards.[145] However, in spite of this progress, the fate of human civilization remains closely linked to changes in the environment. There exists a highly complex feedback loop between the use of advanced technology and changes to the environment.[146] Human-made threats to the Earth's natural environment include pollution, deforestation, and disasters such as oil spills. Humans have contributed to the extinction of many plants and animals,[147] with roughly 1 million species threatened with extinction within decades.[148] The loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functions over the last half century have impacted the extent that nature can contribute to human quality of life,[149] and continued declines could pose a major threat to the existence of human civilization, unless a rapid course correction is made.[150] The value of natural resources to society is often poorly reflected in market prices, because whilst there are extraction costs, natural resources themselves are typically available free of charge. This distorts market pricing of natural resources and at the same time leads to underinvestment in our natural assets. The annual global cost of public subsidies that damage nature is conservatively estimated at $4–6 trillion (million million). Institutional protections of these natural goods, such as the oceans and rainforests, are lacking. Governments have not prevented these economic externalities.[151][152]
Humans employ nature for both leisure and economic activities. The acquisition of natural resources for industrial use remains a sizable component of the world's economic system.[153][154] Some activities, such as hunting and fishing, are used for both sustenance and leisure, often by different people. Agriculture was first adopted around the 9th millennium BCE. Ranging from food production to energy, nature influences economic wealth.
Although early humans gathered uncultivated plant materials for food and employed the medicinal properties of vegetation for healing,[155] most modern human use of plants is through agriculture. The clearance of large tracts of land for crop growth has led to a significant reduction in the amount available of forestation and wetlands, resulting in the loss of habitat for many plant and animal species as well as increased erosion.[156]
Aesthetics and beauty
[edit]
Beauty in nature has historically been a prevalent theme in art and books, filling large sections of libraries and bookstores. That nature has been depicted and celebrated by so much art, photography, poetry, and other literature shows the strength with which many people associate nature and beauty. Reasons why this association exists, and what the association consists of, are studied by the branch of philosophy called aesthetics.[157] Beyond certain basic characteristics that many philosophers agree about to explain what is seen as beautiful, the opinions are virtually endless.[158] Nature and wildness have been important subjects in various eras of world history. An early tradition of landscape art began in China during the Tang Dynasty (618–907).[159] The tradition of representing nature as it is became one of the aims of Chinese painting and was a significant influence in Asian art.[citation needed]
Although natural wonders are celebrated in the Psalms and the Book of Job,[160] in the West, wilderness portrayals in art became more prevalent in the 1800s, especially in the works of the Romantic movement. British artists John Constable and J. M. W. Turner turned their attention to capturing the beauty of the natural world in their paintings.[161] Before that, paintings had been primarily of religious scenes or of human beings.[citation needed] William Wordsworth's poetry described the wonder of the natural world, which had formerly been viewed as a threatening place. Increasingly the valuing of nature became an aspect of Western culture.[162] This artistic movement also coincided with the Transcendentalist movement in the Western world. A common classical idea of beautiful art involves the word mimesis, the imitation of nature.[163] Also in the realm of ideas about beauty in nature is that the perfect is implied through perfect mathematical forms and more generally by patterns in nature. As David Rothenburg writes, "The beautiful is the root of science and the goal of art, the highest possibility that humanity can ever hope to see".[164]: 281
Matter and energy
[edit]
Matter is defined as a substance that has mass and takes up a volume of space, while energy is a property that can make matter perform work. At the quantum mechanical scale of the very tiny, both matter and energy exibit the property of wave–particle duality, and they are related to each other through mass–energy equivalence.[165] Matter constitutes the observable universe, which is made visible by the radiation of energy waves. The visible components of the universe are now believed to compose only 4.9 percent of the total mass. The remainder is in an unknown form that is believed to consist of 26.8 percent cold dark matter and 68.3 percent dark energy.[166] The exact nature of these unseen components is under intensive investigation by physicists.[167]
The behaviour of matter and energy throughout the observable universe appears to follow well-defined physical laws, or laws of nature, which scientists seek to understand.[168] These laws have been employed to produce cosmological models that successfully explain the structure and the evolution of the universe we can observe. The mathematical expressions of the laws of physics employ a set of twenty physical constants[169] that appear to be static across the observable universe.[170] The values of these constants have been carefully measured, but the reason for their specific values remains a mystery. The anthropic principle argues that the physical constants have the observed values precisely because intelligent life is here to observe them.[171]
Beyond Earth
[edit]
Outer space, also simply called space, refers to the relatively empty regions of the universe outside the atmospheres of celestial bodies. Outer space is used to distinguish it from airspace (and terrestrial locations). There is no discrete boundary between Earth's atmosphere and space, as the atmosphere gradually attenuates with increasing altitude.[172] Outer space within the Solar System is called interplanetary space, which passes over into interstellar space at what is known as the heliopause.[173]
Outer space is saturated by blackbody radiation left over from the Big Bang and the origin of the universe.[174] It contains a near-perfect vacuum of predominantly hydrogen and helium plasma,[175] and is permeated by electromagnetic radiation, magnetic fields, and cosmic rays; the latter include various ionized atomic nuclei and subatomic particles. Regions enriched by matter expelled by stars is sparsely filled with dust and numerous types of organic molecules discovered to date by microwave spectroscopy.[176] Near the Earth, there are signs of human life in outer space today, such as material left over from previous crewed and uncrewed launches which are a potential hazard to spacecraft. Some of this debris re-enters the atmosphere periodically.[177]

At the largest scale, the visible universe follows the Cosmological principle, appearing uniformly isotropic and homogeneous in all directions. On smaller scales, observable matter is organized in a hierarchy of structures due to the cumulative effect of gravity. Stars are formed in galaxy structures that typically span up to 100,000 light years in scale. These in turn are organized in larger scale galaxy clusters and groups spanning tens of millions of light years, then superclusters that extend hundreds of millions of light years across.[178] The largest known structures are the galaxy filaments that link together superclusters.[179] In the open regions between these structures are vast, nearly empty voids. Individual galaxies have numerous groupings of stars called clusters. All stars can appear individually or in hierarchical systems of co-orbiting stars. Each star can have orbiting sub-stellar bodies at various scales: brown dwarfs, exoplanets, moons, asteroids and comets, down to meteoroids.[178]
A major question in astronomy concerns the existence of life elsewhere in the universe. Although Earth is the only body within the Solar System known to support life, evidence suggests that in the distant past the planet Mars possessed bodies of liquid water on the surface.[180] For a brief period in Mars' history, it may have also been capable of forming life. At present though, most of the water remaining on Mars is frozen. If life exists at all on Mars, it is most likely to be located underground where liquid water can still exist.[181] Conditions on the other terrestrial planets, Mercury and Venus, appear to be too harsh to support life as we know it. But it has been conjectured that Europa, the fourth-largest moon of Jupiter, may possess a sub-surface ocean of liquid water and could potentially host life.[182] Astronomers have discovered extrasolar Earth analogs – planets that lie in the habitable zone of space surrounding a star, and therefore could possibly host life. However the requirements for life are not completely known and astronomical observations provide limited information.[183]
See also
[edit]Media:
- National Wildlife, a publication of the National Wildlife Federation
- Natural History, by Pliny the Elder
- Natural World (TV series)
- Nature, by Ralph Waldo Emerson
- Nature, a prominent scientific journal
- Nature (TV series)
- The World We Live In (Life magazine)
Organizations:
Philosophy:
- Balance of nature (biological fallacy), a discredited concept of natural equilibrium in predator–prey dynamics
- Mother Nature
- Naturalism, any of several philosophical stances, typically those descended from materialism and pragmatism that do not distinguish the supernatural from nature;[184] this includes the methodological naturalism of natural science, which makes the methodological assumption that observable events in nature are explained only by natural causes, without assuming either the existence or non-existence of the supernatural
- Nature (philosophy)
Notes and references
[edit]- ^ "Definition of NATURE". Merriam-Webster. January 2, 2024. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
- ^ a b c d Ducarme, Frédéric; Couvet, Denis (2020). "What does 'nature' mean?". Palgrave Communications. 6 (14) 14. Springer Nature. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0390-y.
- ^ Isaac Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687), for example, is translated "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy", and reflects the then-current use of the words "natural philosophy", akin to "systematic study of nature"
- ^ The etymology of the word "physical" shows its use as a synonym for "natural" in about the mid-15th century: Harper, Douglas. "physical". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved September 20, 2006.
- ^ Harper, Douglas. "nature". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved September 23, 2006.
- ^ An account of the pre-Socratic use of the concept of φύσις may be found in Naddaf, Gerard (2006) The Greek Concept of Nature, SUNY Press, and in Ducarme, Frédéric; Couvet, Denis (2020). "What does 'nature' mean?". Palgrave Communications. 6 (14) 14. Springer Nature. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0390-y.. The word φύσις, while first used in connection with a plant in Homer, occurs early in Greek philosophy, and in several senses. Generally, these senses match rather well the current senses in which the English word nature is used, as confirmed by Guthrie, W.K.C. Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus (volume 2 of his History of Greek Philosophy), Cambridge UP, 1965.
- ^ The first known use of physis was by Homer in reference to the intrinsic qualities of a plant: ὣς ἄρα φωνήσας πόρε φάρμακον ἀργεϊφόντης ἐκ γαίης ἐρύσας, καί μοι φύσιν αὐτοῦ ἔδειξε. (So saying, Argeiphontes [=Hermes] gave me the herb, drawing it from the ground, and showed me its nature.) Odyssey 10.302–303 (ed. A.T. Murray). (The word is dealt with thoroughly in Liddell and Scott's Greek Lexicon Archived March 5, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.) For later but still very early Greek uses of the term, see earlier note.
- ^ Stano, Simona (2023). Critique of Pure Nature. Numanities – Arts and Humanities in Progress. Vol. 26. Springer Nature. pp. 10–11. ISBN 978-3-031-45075-4.
- ^ Ahmad, Latief; et al. (August 27, 2024). Fundamentals and Applications of Crop and Climate Science. Biomedical and Life Sciences. Springer Nature=2024. p. 169. ISBN 978-3-031-61459-0.
- ^ "World Climates". Blue Planet Biomes. Archived from the original on December 17, 2008. Retrieved September 21, 2006.
- ^ Cech, Thomas V. (2018). Principles of Water Resources: History, Development, Management, and Policy (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 34–37. ISBN 978-1-118-79029-8.
- ^ Wurm, Stefan (2020). The Human Condition: Our Place In The Cosmos & In Life. ATICE LLC. p. 165. ISBN 978-1-951894-00-9.
- ^ Dietrich, Lars E. P.; et al. (August 2006). "The co-evolution of life and Earth". Current Biology. 16 (15): R395-400. Bibcode:2006CBio...16.1579D. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.050. PMID 16753547.
- ^ Martin, Paula; et al. (March 2008). "Why does plate tectonics occur only on Earth?". Physics Education. 43 (2): 144–150. Bibcode:2008PhyEd..43..144M. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/43/2/002.
- ^ Landeau, Maylis; et al. (April 2022). "Sustaining Earth's magnetic dynamo". Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 3 (4): 255–269. Bibcode:2022NRvEE...3..255L. doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00264-1.
- ^ "Calculations favor reducing atmosphere for early Earth". Science Daily. September 11, 2005. Archived from the original on August 30, 2006. Retrieved January 6, 2007.
- ^ "Past Climate Change". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. October 19, 2006. Archived from the original on May 11, 2012. Retrieved January 7, 2007.
- ^ Hugh Anderson; Bernard Walter (March 28, 1997). "History of Climate Change". NASA. Archived from the original on January 23, 2008. Retrieved January 7, 2007.
- ^ Weart, Spencer (June 2006). "The Discovery of Global Warming". American Institute of Physics. Archived from the original on August 4, 2011. Retrieved January 7, 2007.
- ^ De Vivo, Benedetto; et al. (2009). "Preface". Geology. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Vol. 1. UNESCO/EOLSS Publications. pp. xxx–xxxi. ISBN 978-1-84826-004-7.
- ^ a b Salita, Domingo C. (2002). Environmental Geography. JMC Press, Inc. pp. 39–44. ISBN 978-971-11-1091-8.
- ^ a b DiPietro, Joseph A. (2024). Geology and Landscape Evolution: General Principles Applied to the United States (3rd ed.). Elsevier. pp. 11–24. ISBN 978-0-443-15895-7.
- ^ Dalrymple, G. Brent (1991). The Age of the Earth. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-1569-0.
- ^ Morbidelli, A.; et al. (2000). "Source Regions and Time Scales for the Delivery of Water to Earth". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 35 (6): 1309–1320. Bibcode:2000M&PS...35.1309M. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01518.x.
- ^ "Earth's Oldest Mineral Grains Suggest an Early Start for Life". NASA Astrobiology Institute. December 24, 2001. Archived from the original on September 28, 2006. Retrieved May 24, 2006.
- ^ a b Margulis, Lynn; Sagan, Dorian (1995). What is Life?. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-684-81326-4.
- ^ Murphy, J. B.; Nance, R. D. (2004). "How do supercontinents assemble?". American Scientist. 92 (4): 324. doi:10.1511/2004.4.324. Archived from the original on January 28, 2011. Retrieved August 23, 2010.
- ^ Kirschvink, J. L. (1992). "Late Proterozoic Low-Latitude Global Glaciation: The Snowball Earth" (PDF). In Schopf, J. W.; Klein, C. (eds.). The Proterozoic Biosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-0-521-36615-1. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 22, 2006.
- ^ Raup, David M.; Sepkoski Jr., J. John (March 1982). "Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record". Science. 215 (4539): 1501–1503. Bibcode:1982Sci...215.1501R. doi:10.1126/science.215.4539.1501. PMID 17788674. S2CID 43002817.
- ^ Margulis, Lynn; Dorian Sagan (1995). What is Life?. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 145. ISBN 978-0-684-81326-4.
- ^ Turvey, Samuel T.; Crees, Jennifer J. (October 2019). "Extinction in the Anthropocene". Current Biology. 29 (19): R982 – R986. Bibcode:2019CBio...29.R982T. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.040. PMID 31593681.
- ^ Gumsley, Ashley P.; et al. (February 6, 2017). "Timing and tempo of the Great Oxidation Event". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 (8): 1811–1816. Bibcode:2017PNAS..114.1811G. doi:10.1073/pnas.1608824114. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5338422. PMID 28167763.
- ^ Diamond, J.; et al. (1989). "The present, past and future of human-caused extinctions". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B Biological Sciences. 325 (1228): 469–476, discussion 476–477. Bibcode:1989RSPTB.325..469D. doi:10.1098/rstb.1989.0100. PMID 2574887.
- ^ Novacek, M.; Cleland, E. (2001). "The current biodiversity extinction event: scenarios for mitigation and recovery". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 (10): 5466–5470. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.5466N. doi:10.1073/pnas.091093698. PMC 33235. PMID 11344295.
- ^ Wick, Lucia; Möhl, Adrian (2006). "The mid-Holocene extinction of silver fir (Abies alba) in the Southern Alps: a consequence of forest fires? Palaeobotanical records and forest simulations" (PDF). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. 15 (4): 435–444. Bibcode:2006VegHA..15..435W. doi:10.1007/s00334-006-0051-0. S2CID 52953180. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 15, 2018. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
- ^ "The Holocene Extinction". Park.org. Archived from the original on September 25, 2006. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
- ^ "Mass Extinctions Of The Phanerozoic Menu". Park.org. Archived from the original on September 25, 2006. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
- ^ "Patterns of Extinction". Park.org. Archived from the original on September 25, 2006. Retrieved November 3, 2006.
- ^ Cox, Arthur N., ed. (2002). "11. Earth". Allen's Astrophysical Quantities (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1186-0. ISBN 978-1-4612-7037-9.
- ^ Daniel, R. R. (2002). Concepts in Space Science. Universities Press. pp. 70–72. ISBN 978-81-7371-410-8.
- ^ "Science: Ozone Basics". Stratospheric Ozone. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association. Retrieved July 22, 2025.
- ^ Corbet, John H. (2005). Physical Geography Manual. Kendall Hunt. p. 67. ISBN 978-0-7872-9247-8.
- ^ Miller; Spoolman, Scott (September 28, 2007). Environmental Science: Problems, Connections and Solutions. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-495-38337-6.
- ^ Stern, Harvey; Davidson, Noel (May 25, 2015). "Trends in the skill of weather prediction at lead times of 1–14 days". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 141 (692): 2726–2736. Bibcode:2015QJRMS.141.2726S. doi:10.1002/qj.2559. S2CID 119942734.
- ^ O'Hare, Greg; et al. (2014). Weather, Climate and Climate Change: Human Perspectives. Routledge. pp. 67–68. ISBN 978-1-317-90482-3.
- ^ Veenema, Tener Goodwin (2018). Disaster Nursing and Emergency Preparedness (4th ed.). Springer Publishing Company. pp. 299–305. ISBN 978-0-8261-4422-5.
- ^ Chapin (III), Francis Stuart; et al. (2002). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 123–147. ISBN 978-0-387-95443-1.
- ^ Huang, Bingru (2016). "Cellular Membranes in Stress Sensing and Regulation of Plant Adaption to Abiotic Stresses". Plant-Environment Interactions. Books in soils, plants, and the environment (3rd ed.). CRC Press. pp. 2–3. ISBN 978-1-4200-1934-6.
- ^ Kilifarska, N. A.; et al. (2020). The Hidden Link Between Earth's Magnetic Field and Climate. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-819347-1.
- ^ Fluteau, Frédéric (January 2003). "Earth dynamics and climate changes". Comptes Rendus Geoscience. 335 (1): 157–174. doi:10.1016/S1631-0713(03)00004-X.
- ^ "Tropical Ocean Warming Drives Recent Northern Hemisphere Climate Change". Science Daily. April 6, 2001. Archived from the original on April 21, 2006. Retrieved May 24, 2006.
- ^ Joseph, Antony (2013). Measuring Ocean Currents: Tools, Technologies, and Data. Newnes. pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-0-12-391428-6.
- ^ Birdsall, Stephen S.; et al. (2017). Regional Landscapes of the US and Canada (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 27–31. ISBN 978-1-118-79034-2.
- ^ Mongillo, John F.; Zierdt-Warshaw, Linda (2000). Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. University Rochester Press. ISBN 978-1-57356-147-1.
- ^ "Water for Life". Un.org. March 22, 2005. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. Retrieved May 14, 2011.
- ^ "World". CIA – World Fact Book. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved December 20, 2008.
- ^ "Water Vapor in the Climate System". Special Report. American Geophysical Union. December 1995. Archived from the original on March 20, 2007. Retrieved March 20, 2007.
- ^ "Vital Water". UNEP. Archived from the original on February 20, 2008. Retrieved February 20, 2008.
- ^ Stephens, Graeme L.; et al. (April 2020). "Earth's water reservoirs in a changing climate". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 476 (2236). id. 20190458. Bibcode:2020RSPSA.47690458S. doi:10.1098/rspa.2019.0458. PMC 7209137. PMID 32398926.
- ^ Andrault, Denis; Bolfan-Casanova, Nathalie (January 2022). "Mantle rain toward the Earth's surface: A model for the internal cycle of water". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 322 106815. id. 106815. Bibcode:2022PEPI..32206815A. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106815.
- ^ "Ocean". The Columbia Encyclopedia. New York: Columbia University Press. 2002. Archived from the original on January 26, 2011. Retrieved January 26, 2011.
- ^ "Distribution of land and water on the planet". UN Atlas of the Oceans. May 31, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2008. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
- ^ Spilhaus, Athelstan F. (1942). "Maps of the whole world ocean". Geographical Review. 32 (3): 431–435. Bibcode:1942GeoRv..32..431S. doi:10.2307/210385. JSTOR 210385.
- ^ Khan, Firdos Alam (2020). Biotechnology Fundamentals (Third ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-000-04148-4.
- ^ Talley, Lynne D.; et al. (2011). Descriptive Physical Oceanography: An Introduction (6th ed.). Academic Press. pp. 7–17. ISBN 978-0-08-093911-7.
- ^ Soderlund, Krista M.; et al. (January 2023). "The Physical Oceanography of Ice-Covered Moons". Annual Review of Marine Science. 16: 25–53. Bibcode:2023ARMS...16...25S. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-040323-101355.
- ^
Britannica Online. "Lake (physical feature)". Archived from the original on June 11, 2008. Retrieved June 25, 2008.
[a Lake is] any relatively large body of slowly moving or standing water that occupies an inland basin of appreciable size. Definitions that precisely distinguish lakes, ponds, swamps, and even rivers and other bodies of nonoceanic water are not well established. It may be said, however, that rivers and streams are relatively fast moving; marshes and swamps contain relatively large quantities of grasses, trees, or shrubs; and ponds are relatively small in comparison to lakes. Geologically defined, lakes are temporary bodies of water.
- ^ "Lake Definition". Dictionary.com. Archived from the original on September 5, 2016. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
- ^ Lunine, Jonathan I.; Lorenz, Ralph D. (May 2009). "Rivers, Lakes, Dunes, and Rain: Crustal Processes in Titan's Methane Cycle". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 37 (1): 299–320. Bibcode:2009AREPS..37..299L. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100142.
- ^ Cohen, Andrew S. (2003). Paleolimnology: The History and Evolution of Lake Systems. Oxford University Press. pp. 21–55. ISBN 978-0-19-513353-0.
- ^ Brenner, M.; Escobar, J. (2009). "Ontogeny of Lake Ecosystems". In Likens, Gene E. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Gale virtual reference library. Vol. 1. Academic Press. pp. 456–459. ISBN 978-0-12-370626-3.
- ^ Deacon, Charl; et al. (September 2018). Chapman, Maura (Gee) Geraldine (ed.). "Artificial reservoirs complement natural ponds to improve pondscape resilience in conservation corridors in a biodiversity hotspot". PLOS ONE. 13 (9) e0204148. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1304148D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204148. PMC 6147492. PMID 30235267.
- ^ Adams, Clark E. (2012). Urban Wildlife Management (2nd ed.). CRC Press. pp. 116–117. ISBN 978-1-4665-2127-8.
- ^ Compton, Lawrence V. (1943). Techniques of Fishpond Management. Miscellaneous publication. U.S. Department of Agriculture. pp. 1–21.
- ^ El-Sebaii, A. A.; et al. (January 2011). "History of the solar ponds: A review study". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15 (6): 3319–3325. Bibcode:2011RSERv..15.3319E. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.008.
- ^ Mischke, Charles C., ed. (2012). Aquaculture Pond Fertilization: Impacts of Nutrient Input on Production. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 23–29. ISBN 978-1-118-32941-2.
- ^ "River {definition}". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on February 21, 2010. Retrieved February 21, 2010.
- ^ Upadhyay, R. K. (2025). Geology and Mineral Resources. Springer Geology. Springer Nature. pp. 225–242. ISBN 978-981-96-0598-9.
- ^ a b Speight, James G. (2019). Natural Water Remediation: Chemistry and Technology. Elsevier. pp. 16–17. ISBN 978-0-12-803810-9.
- ^ "USGS – U.S. Geological Survey – FAQs". Archived from the original on July 1, 2015. Retrieved July 1, 2015.
No. 17 What is the difference between mountain, hill, and peak; lake and pond; or river and creek?
- ^ Pusey, Bradley J.; Arthington, Angela H. (2003). "Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review". Marine and Freshwater Research. 54 (1): 1. Bibcode:2003MFRes..54....1P. doi:10.1071/MF02041.
- ^ Brauer, Chris J.; Beheregaray, Luciano B. (December 2020). "Recent and rapid anthropogenic habitat fragmentation increases extinction risk for freshwater biodiversity". Evolutionary Applications. 13 (10): 2857–2869. Bibcode:2020EvApp..13.2857B. doi:10.1111/eva.13128. PMC 7691462. PMID 33294027.
- ^ "Linking Stream Geomorphology and Aquatic Ecology". Streams, Rivers, and Estuaries (STRIVE) Lab: School of Environment and Natural Resources. The Ohio State University. November 11, 2016. Retrieved September 17, 2025.
- ^ Adams, C.E. (1994). "The fish community of Loch Lomond, Scotland: its history and rapidly changing status". Hydrobiologia. 290 (1–3): 91–102. Bibcode:1994HyBio.290...91A. doi:10.1007/BF00008956. S2CID 6894397. Archived from the original on January 14, 2012. Retrieved January 5, 2007.
- ^ Pidwirny, Michael (2006). "Introduction to the Biosphere: Introduction to the Ecosystem Concept". Fundamentals of Physical Geography (2nd ed.). Archived from the original on July 18, 2011. Retrieved September 28, 2006.
- ^ Mareddy, Anji Reddy (2017). Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory and Practice. Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 317–319. ISBN 978-0-12-811238-0.
- ^ Odum, E. P. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology (3rd ed.). New York: Saunders.
- ^ Pidwirny, Michael (2006). "Introduction to the Biosphere: Organization of Life". Fundamentals of Physical Geography (2nd ed.). Archived from the original on August 13, 2011. Retrieved September 28, 2006.
- ^ Khan, Firdos Alam (2011). Biotechnology Fundamentals. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4398-2009-4.
- ^ Bailey, Robert G. (April 2004). "Identifying Ecoregion Boundaries" (PDF). Environmental Management. 34 (Supplement 1): S14 – S26. Bibcode:2004EnMan..34S..14B. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0163-6. PMID 15883869. S2CID 31998098. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 1, 2009.
- ^ Botkin, Daniel B. (2000). No Man's Garden. Island Press. pp. 155–157. ISBN 1-55963-465-0.
- ^ Hunter, Jr., Malcolm L.; Gibbs, James P. (2009). Fundamentals of Conservation Biology (3 ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 226–251. ISBN 978-1-4443-0897-6.
- ^ "Definition of Life". California Academy of Sciences. 2006. Archived from the original on February 8, 2007. Retrieved January 7, 2007.
- ^ Sagan, Carl (2018). "Definitions of Life". In Bedau, Mark A.; Cleland, Carol E. (eds.). The Nature of Life. Cambridge University Press. pp. 303–306. ISBN 978-1-108-72206-3.
- ^ Aguilar, Wendy; et al. (October 10, 2014). "The past, present, and future of artificial life". Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 1 (8). doi:10.3389/frobt.2014.00008.
- ^ Neveu M, Kim HJ, Benner SA (April 2013). "The "strong" RNA world hypothesis: fifty years old". Astrobiology. 13 (4): 391–403. Bibcode:2013AsBio..13..391N. doi:10.1089/ast.2012.0868. PMID 23551238.
- ^ Cech TR (July 2012). "The RNA worlds in context". Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 4 (7) a006742. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006742. PMC 3385955. PMID 21441585.
- ^ Cafferty, Brian J.; et al. (2018). "Searching for Possible Ancestors of RNA: The Self-Assembly Hypothesis for the Origin of Proto-RNA". In Menor-Salván, César (ed.). Prebiotic Chemistry and Chemical Evolution of Nucleic Acids. pp. 143–174. Bibcode:2018pcce.book..143C. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93584-3_5. ISBN 978-3-319-93583-6.
- ^ Sharov, Alexei A. (March 28, 2016). "Evolution of Natural Agents: Preservation, Advance, and Emergence of Functional Information". Biosemiotics. 9 (1): 103–120. doi:10.1007/s12304-015-9250-3. PMC 4978442. PMID 27525048.
- ^ Bernstein, H.; Byerly, H. C.; Hopf, F. A.; Michod, R. E. (September 1985). "Genetic damage, mutation, and the evolution of sex". Science. 229 (4719): 1277–81. Bibcode:1985Sci...229.1277B. doi:10.1126/science.3898363. PMID 3898363.
- ^ Savenko, V. S. (March 2023). "Ecosphere and Biosphere". Geography and Natural Resources. 44 (1): 9–15. Bibcode:2023GNR....44....9S. doi:10.1134/S1875372823010092.
- ^ The figure "about one-half of one percent" takes into account the following (See, e.g., Leckie, Stephen (1999). "How Meat-centred Eating Patterns Affect Food Security and the Environment". For hunger-proof cities: sustainable urban food systems. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre. ISBN 978-0-88936-882-8. Archived from the original on November 13, 2010., which takes global average weight as 60 kg.), the total human biomass is the average weight multiplied by the current human population of approximately 6.5 billion (see, e.g., "World Population Information". U.S. Census Bureau. Archived from the original on September 22, 2006. Retrieved September 28, 2006.): Assuming 60–70 kg to be the average human mass (approximately 130–150 lb on the average), an approximation of total global human mass of between 390 billion (390×109) and 455 billion kg (between 845 billion and 975 billion lb, or about 423 million–488 million short tons). The total biomass of all kinds on earth is estimated to be in excess of 6.8×1013 kg (75 billion short tons). By these calculations, the portion of total biomass accounted for by humans would be very roughly 0.6%.
- ^ Sengbusch, Peter V. "The Flow of Energy in Ecosystems – Productivity, Food Chain, and Trophic Level". Botany online. University of Hamburg Department of Biology. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved September 23, 2006.
- ^ Pidwirny, Michael (2006). "Introduction to the Biosphere: Species Diversity and Biodiversity". Fundamentals of Physical Geography (2nd Edition). Archived from the original on July 18, 2011. Retrieved September 23, 2006.
- ^ "How Many Species are There?". Extinction Web Page Class Notes. Archived from the original on September 9, 2006. Retrieved September 23, 2006.
- ^ "Animal." World Book Encyclopedia. 16 vols. Chicago: World Book, 2003. This source gives an estimate of from 2 to 50 million.
- ^ "Just How Many Species Are There, Anyway?". Science Daily. May 2003. Archived from the original on February 11, 2007. Retrieved September 26, 2006.
- ^ Withers, Mark A.; et al. (1998). "Changing Patterns in the Number of Species in North American Floras". Land Use History of North America. Archived from the original on September 23, 2006. Retrieved September 26, 2006. Website based on the contents of the book: Sisk, T.D., ed. (1998). Perspectives on the land use history of North America: a context for understanding our changing environment (Revised September 1999 ed.). U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division. USGS/BRD/BSR-1998-0003.
- ^ "Tropical Scientists Find Fewer Species Than Expected". Science Daily. April 2002. Archived from the original on August 30, 2006. Retrieved September 27, 2006.
- ^ Bunker, Daniel E.; et al. (November 2005). "Species Loss and Aboveground Carbon Storage in a Tropical Forest". Science. 310 (5750): 1029–1031. Bibcode:2005Sci...310.1029B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.465.7559. doi:10.1126/science.1117682. PMID 16239439. S2CID 42696030.
- ^ Wilcox, Bruce A. (2006). "Amphibian Decline: More Support for Biocomplexity as a Research Paradigm". EcoHealth. 3 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1007/s10393-005-0013-5. S2CID 23011961.
- ^ Clarke, Robin; Robert Lamb; Dilys Roe Ward, eds. (2002). "Decline and loss of species". Global environment outlook 3: past, present and future perspectives. London; Sterling, VA: Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP. ISBN 978-92-807-2087-7.
- ^ "Why the Amazon Rainforest is So Rich in Species: News". Earthobservatory.nasa.gov. December 5, 2005. Archived from the original on February 25, 2011. Retrieved May 14, 2011.
- ^ "Why The Amazon Rainforest Is So Rich in Species". Sciencedaily.com. December 5, 2005. Archived from the original on February 25, 2011. Retrieved May 14, 2011.
- ^ Schopf, J. William; et al. (2007). "Evidence of Archean life: Stromatolites and microfossils". Precambrian Research. 158 (3–4): 141–155. Bibcode:2007PreR..158..141S. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.009.
- ^ Schopf, J. W. (2006). "Fossil evidence of Archaean life". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 361 (1470): 869–885. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1834. PMC 1578735. PMID 16754604.
- ^ Raven, Peter Hamilton; Johnson, George Brooks (2002). Biology. McGraw-Hill Education. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-07-112261-0. Retrieved July 7, 2013.
- ^ a b Line, M. (January 1, 2002). "The enigma of the origin of life and its timing". Microbiology. 148 (Pt 1): 21–27. doi:10.1099/00221287-148-1-21. PMID 11782495.
- ^ Gabora, Liane (August 7, 2006). "Self-other organization: Why early life did not evolve through natural selection". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 241 (3): 443–450. arXiv:nlin/0512025. Bibcode:2006JThBi.241..443G. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.12.007. PMID 16442126.
- ^ "Photosynthesis more ancient than thought, and most living things could do it". Phys.org. Archived from the original on January 20, 2019. Retrieved January 19, 2019.
- ^ Berkner, L. V.; Marshall, L. C. (May 1965). "On the Origin and Rise of Oxygen Concentration in the Earth's Atmosphere". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 22 (3): 225–261. Bibcode:1965JAtS...22..225B. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1965)022<0225:OTOARO>2.0.CO;2.
- ^ Schopf J (1994). "Disparate rates, differing fates: tempo and mode of evolution changed from the Precambrian to the Phanerozoic". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91 (15): 6735–42. Bibcode:1994PNAS...91.6735S. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.15.6735. PMC 44277. PMID 8041691.
- ^ Microorganism at the Encyclopædia Britannica
- ^ "Unicellular". BiologyOnline.com. Retrieved August 5, 2008.
- ^ Szewzyk U; Szewzyk R; Stenström T (1994). "Thermophilic, anaerobic bacteria isolated from a deep borehole in granite in Sweden". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91 (5): 1810–1813. Bibcode:1994PNAS...91.1810S. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.5.1810. PMC 43253. PMID 11607462.
- ^ Wolska K (2003). "Horizontal DNA transfer between bacteria in the environment". Acta Microbiol Pol. 52 (3): 233–243. PMID 14743976.
- ^ Horneck G (1981). "Survival of microorganisms in space: a review". Adv Space Res. 1 (14): 39–48. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(81)90241-6. PMID 11541716.
- ^ Solomon, Eldra; Martin, Charles; Martin, Diana W.; Berg, Linda R. (2019). Biology. Cengage Learning. pp. 408, 420–422. ISBN 978-1305179899.
- ^ Ingram, Neil; et al. (2021). Fullick, Ann (ed.). Evolution. Oxford biology primers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-886257-4.
- ^ Reznick, David N. (2010). The 'Origin' Then and Now: An Interpretive Guide to the 'Origin of Species'. Princeton University Press. pp. 347–348. ISBN 978-0-691-15257-8.
- ^ "flora". Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on April 30, 2006. Retrieved September 27, 2006.
- ^ "Glossary". Status and Trends of the Nation's Biological Resources. Reston, VA: Department of the Interior, Geological Survey. 1998. SuDocs No. I 19.202:ST 1/V.1-2. Archived from the original on July 15, 2007.
- ^ McLaughlin, Steven P. (1994). "Floristic plant geography: the classification of floristic areas and floristic elements". Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. 18 (2): 185–208. Bibcode:1994PrPG...18..185M. doi:10.1177/030913339401800202.
- ^ Crane, Peter R.; et al. (2004). "Fossils and plant phylogeny 1". American Journal of Botany. 91 (10): 1683–1699. Bibcode:2004AmJB...91.1683C. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1683. PMID 21652317.
- ^ a b Radosevich, Steven R.; et al. (2007). Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-16893-6.
- ^ Braverman, Irus (2013). "Legal Tails: Policing American Cities through Animals". In Lippert, Randy; Walby, Kevin (eds.). Policing Cities: Urban Securitization and Regulation in a 21st Century World. Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-26162-6.
- ^ Panstruga, R.; et al. (July 7, 2023). "Looking outside the box: a comparative cross-kingdom view on the cell biology of the three major lineages of eukaryotic multicellular life". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 80 (8) 198. doi:10.1007/s00018-023-04843-3.
- ^ Colgren, Jeffrey; Nichols, Scott A. (March 2020). "The significance of sponges for comparative studies of developmental evolution". WIREs Developmental Biology. 9 (2) e359. doi:10.1002/wdev.359. PMID 31352684.
- ^ Kosal, Erica (2023). "Animal Kingdom". Introductory Biology: Ecology, Evolution, and Biodiversity. NC State University Libraries. Retrieved September 18, 2025.
- ^ Elhacham, Emily; Ben-Uri, Liad; et al. (2020). "Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass". Nature. 588 (7838): 442–444. Bibcode:2020Natur.588..442E. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5. PMID 33299177. S2CID 228077506.
- ^ Carrington, Damian (April 15, 2021). "Just 3% of world's ecosystems remain intact, study suggests". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 24, 2021. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
- ^ Plumptre, Andrew J.; Baisero, Daniele; et al. (2021). "Where Might We Find Ecologically Intact Communities?". Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 4 626635. Bibcode:2021FrFGC...4.6635P. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2021.626635. hdl:10261/242175.
- ^ Cafaro, Philip (2022). "Reducing Human Numbers and the Size of our Economies is Necessary to Avoid a Mass Extinction and Share Earth Justly with Other Species". Philosophia. 50 (5): 2263–2282. doi:10.1007/s11406-022-00497-w. S2CID 247433264.
- ^ Dahlberg, Kenneth A. (2019). "The Changing Nature of Natural Resources". In Dahlberg, Kenneth A.; Bennett, John W. (eds.). Natural Resources and People: Conceptual Issues in Interdisciplinary Research. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-71168-8.
- ^ Coppola, Damon (2010). Introduction to International Disaster Management (2 ed.). Elsevier. pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-0-12-382175-1.
- ^ "Feedback Loops in Global Climate Change Point to a Very Hot 21st Century". Science Daily. May 22, 2006. Archived from the original on December 8, 2006. Retrieved January 7, 2007.
- ^ Kolbert, Elizabeth (2014). The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. New York City: Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 978-0-8050-9299-8.
- ^ Stokstad, Erik (May 5, 2019). "Landmark analysis documents the alarming global decline of nature". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aax9287. S2CID 166478506.
- ^ Brauman, Kate A.; Garibaldi, Lucas A. (2020). "Global trends in nature's contributions to people". PNAS. 117 (51): 32799–32805. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11732799B. doi:10.1073/pnas.2010473117. PMC 7768808. PMID 33288690.
- ^ Bradshaw, Corey J. A.; Ehrlich, Paul R.; Beattie, Andrew; Ceballos, Gerardo; Crist, Eileen; Diamond, Joan; Dirzo, Rodolfo; Ehrlich, Anne H.; Harte, John; Harte, Mary Ellen; Pyke, Graham; Raven, Peter H.; Ripple, William J.; Saltré, Frédérik; Turnbull, Christine; Wackernagel, Mathis; Blumstein, Daniel T. (2021). "Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future". Frontiers in Conservation Science. 1 615419. Bibcode:2021FrCS....1.5419B. doi:10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419.
- ^ UK Government Official Documents, February 2021, "The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review Headline Messages" Archived May 20, 2022, at the Wayback Machine p. 2
- ^ Carrington, Damian (February 2, 2021). "Economics of biodiversity review: what are the recommendations?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on May 24, 2022. Retrieved November 13, 2021.
- ^ "Natural Resources contribution to GDP". World Development Indicators (WDI). November 2014. Archived from the original on December 23, 2014.
- ^ "GDP – Composition by Sector". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on May 22, 2014. Retrieved February 19, 2017.
- ^ "Plant Conservation Alliance – Medicinal Plant Working Groups Green Medicine". US National Park Services. Archived from the original on October 9, 2006. Retrieved September 23, 2006.
- ^ Oosthoek, Jan (1999). "Environmental History: Between Science & Philosophy". Environmental History Resources. Archived from the original on June 26, 2007. Retrieved December 1, 2006.
- ^ Velasco, Marcelo; Nieto, Ignacio (2024). The Art-Science Symbiosis. Springer Nature. pp. 51–55. ISBN 978-3-031-47404-0.
- ^ "On the Beauty of Nature". The Wilderness Society. Archived from the original on September 9, 2006. Retrieved September 29, 2006.
- ^ Brown, Ju; Brown, John (2006). China, Japan, Korea: Culture and Customs. Book Surge, LLD. pp. 104–108. ISBN 978-1-4196-4893-9.
- ^ Himmelfarb, Martha (2010). The Apocalypse: A Brief History. Wiley Blackwell Brief Histories of Religion. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-1822-7.
- ^ The New York Times (2007). The New York Times Guide to Essential Knowledge, A Desk Reference for the Curious Mind (Second ed.). Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-37659-8.
- ^ "History of Conservation". BC Spaces for Nature. July 8, 2006. Archived from the original on July 8, 2006. Retrieved May 20, 2006.
- ^ Crowell, Steven (2010). "Phenomenology and Aestetics; or, why art matters". In Parry, Joseph (ed.). Art and Phenomenology. Routledge. p. 32. ISBN 978-1-136-84685-4.
- ^ Rothenberg, David (2011). Survival of the Beautiful: Art, Science and Evolution. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-60819-216-8.
- ^ Chang, Donald C. (February 27, 2024). "Why Can Mass and Energy Be Converted Between Each Other? Energy, Momentum, and Mass Have Geometrical Meanings in the Wave View". On the Wave Nature of Matter. Springer, Cham. pp. 143–160. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48777-4_11. ISBN 978-3-031-48776-7.
- ^ Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Armitage-Caplan, C.; et al. (Planck Collaboration) (March 22, 2013). "Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results – Table 9". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 571: A1. arXiv:1303.5062. Bibcode:2014A&A...571A...1P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321529. S2CID 218716838.
- ^ Oks, Eugene (December 2021). "Brief review of recent advances in understanding dark matter and dark energy". New Astronomy Reviews. 93 101632. id. 101632. arXiv:2111.00363. Bibcode:2021NewAR..9301632O. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2021.101632.
- ^ Feynman, Richard (1965). The Character of Physical Law. Modern Library. ISBN 978-0-679-60127-2.
- ^ Taylor, Barry N. (1971). "Introduction to the constants for nonexperts". National Institute of Standards and Technology. Archived from the original on January 7, 2007. Retrieved January 7, 2007.
- ^ Varshalovich, D.A.; Potekhin, A.Y. & Ivanchik, A.V. (2000). "Testing cosmological variability of fundamental constants". AIP Conference Proceedings. 506: 503. arXiv:physics/0004062. Bibcode:2000AIPC..506..503V. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.43.6877. doi:10.1063/1.1302777.
- ^ Müller, Berndt (2002). "The Anthropic Principle Revisited". In Gurzadyan, V. G.; Sedrakian, A. G. (eds.). From Integrable Models to Gauge Theories: A Volume in Honor of Sergei Matinyan. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. pp. 251–260. arXiv:astro-ph/0108259. Bibcode:2002fimg.book..251M. doi:10.1142/9789812777478_0016. ISBN 978-981-277-747-8.
- ^ Frederick, John E. (2008). Principles of Atmospheric Science. Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-7637-4089-4.
- ^ Stone, E. C. (2003). "Voyager Journeys to Interstellar Space" (PDF). Engineering and Science. 66 (1): 10–17. Retrieved September 12, 2025.
- ^ Webster, Adrian (August 1974). "The Cosmic Background Radiation". Scientific American. 231 (2): 26–33. Bibcode:1974SciAm.231b..26W. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0874-26. JSTOR 24950140.
- ^ Trimble, Virginia (June 1991). "The origin and abundances of the chemical elements revisited". The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review. 3 (1): 1–46. Bibcode:1991A&ARv...3....1T. doi:10.1007/BF00873456.
- ^ Kwok, S. (2009). "Organic matter in space: from star dust to the Solar System". Astrophysics and Space Science. 319 (1): 5–21. Bibcode:2009Ap&SS.319....5K. doi:10.1007/s10509-008-9965-6.
- ^ Pardini, Carmen; Anselmo, Luciano (June 2025). "Orbital re-entries of human-made space objects: Drawbacks for the upper atmosphere and the safety of people". Journal of Space Safety Engineering. 12 (2): 274–283. doi:10.1016/j.jsse.2025.04.009.
- ^ a b Frè, Pietro Giuseppe (2012). Black Holes, Cosmology and Introduction to Supergravity. Gravity, a Geometrical Course. Vol. 2. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 86–88. ISBN 978-94-007-5443-0.
- ^ Boehringer, Hans; et al. (March 7, 2025). "Unveiling the largest structures in the nearby Universe: Discovery of the Quipu superstructure". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 695 (A59): A59. arXiv:2501.19236. Bibcode:2025A&A...695A..59B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453582.
- ^ Bibring, J; et al. (2006). "Global mineralogical and aqueous mars history derived from OMEGA/Mars Express data". Science. 312 (5772): 400–404. Bibcode:2006Sci...312..400B. doi:10.1126/science.1122659. PMID 16627738. S2CID 13968348.
- ^ Malik, Tariq (March 8, 2005). "Hunt for Mars life should go underground". Space.com via NBC News. Archived from the original on September 30, 2013. Retrieved September 4, 2006.
- ^ Turner, Scott (March 2, 1998). "Detailed Images From Europa Point To Slush Below Surface". NASA. Archived from the original on September 29, 2006. Retrieved September 28, 2006.
- ^ Winn, Joshua N.; Fabrycky, Daniel C. (August 18, 2015). "The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 53 (1): 409–447. arXiv:1410.4199. Bibcode:2015ARA&A..53..409W. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122246. ISSN 0066-4146.
- ^ Papineau, David (2016) "Naturalism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Archived April 1, 2019, at the Wayback Machine>
Further reading
[edit]- Droz, Layna; et al. (May 31, 2022). "Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of nature in East and South-East Asia". Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 9 (1) 186: 1–12. doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01186-5. ISSN 2662-9992.
- Ducarme, Frédéric; Couvet, Denis (2020). "What does 'nature' mean?". Palgrave Communications. 6 (14) 14. Springer Nature. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0390-y.
- Emerson, Ralph W. (1836). Nature. Boston: James Munroe & Co.
- Farber, Paul Lawrence (2000), Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E. O. Wilson. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
- Lynch, Derek (October 17, 2023). "Have we reached the end of nature? Our relationship with the environment is in crisis". The Conversation. Archived from the original on October 22, 2023.
- Naddaf, Gerard (2006). The Greek Concept of Nature. Albany: SUNY Press.
- Piccolo, John J.; Taylor, Bron; Washington, Haydn; Kopnina, Helen; Gray, Joe; Alberro, Heather; Orlikowska, Ewa (2022). ""Nature's contributions to people" and peoples' moral obligations to nature". Biological Conservation. 270 109572. Bibcode:2022BCons.27009572P. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109572. S2CID 248769087.
- Worster, D. (1994). Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
External links
[edit]- The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (iucnredlist.org) Archived June 27, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
- Ducarme, Frédéric (January 3, 2021). "What is nature?". Encyclopedia of the Environment. Archived from the original on April 23, 2021.
Nature
View on GrokipediaEtymology and Conceptual Foundations
Etymology
The English word nature first appeared in the late 13th century, borrowed from Old French nature and directly from Latin nātūra, denoting "birth," "essential qualities," "innate disposition," or "natural character."[5] This Latin term derives from nātus, the past participle of nāscī ("to be born" or "to spring forth"), emphasizing origins, growth, and the intrinsic properties arising from birth.[6] The root traces further to the Proto-Indo-European *ǵenh₁-* ("to produce" or "beget"), which underlies concepts of generation and inherent essence across Indo-European languages.[7] In classical Latin usage, nātūra extended beyond biological birth to describe the constitutive principles of things, including the "course of things" or the systematic order observed in the physical world, as employed by authors like Cicero and Lucretius around the 1st century BCE.[5] By the medieval period, the term's adoption into Old French and then Middle English retained this sense of fundamental character while broadening to encompass the material universe distinct from human artifice, reflecting scholastic distinctions between natura naturans (nature naturing, or creative principle) and natura naturata (nature natured, or created order).[6] Early English attestations, such as in Chaucer's works circa 1386, applied it to both personal disposition and the external world of plants, animals, and elements.[5]Definitions Across Disciplines
In philosophy, nature (physis in Greek) is frequently defined as the intrinsic principle or essence that governs the behavior, change, and persistence of entities, serving as the source of their properties and operations. Aristotle, for instance, described nature as "an inner principle of change and being at rest" inherent to entities, distinguishing natural motion (like growth or decay) from artificial or forced motion.[8] This conception emphasizes teleology, where natural things possess an inherent end or purpose directed by their essential form, contrasting with mere mechanical causation.[9] In the natural sciences, particularly physics and biology, nature refers to the observable physical universe comprising matter, energy, and their interactions, governed by invariant laws independent of human intervention. Physics conceptualizes nature as the totality of phenomena explainable through fundamental forces and principles, such as conservation laws and quantum mechanics, where entities evolve according to empirical regularities rather than prescriptive essences.[10] Biology extends this to living systems, defining nature as the aggregate of organisms and their environments, studied through evolutionary processes and ecological dynamics, excluding human-modified artifacts.[11] In ecology and environmental science, nature denotes the non-human biosphere and abiotic components—such as ecosystems, biodiversity, and geophysical cycles—that sustain self-regulating processes like nutrient cycling and species interactions, often contrasted with anthropogenic influences. This view prioritizes nature's capacity for regeneration and homeostasis, as seen in definitions framing it as the "ecosphere" where genetic, species, and ecosystem diversity operates under biophysical constraints.[12] Such definitions underpin conservation efforts, recognizing nature's role in providing ecosystem services like pollination and water purification, quantifiable through metrics such as species richness (e.g., global estimates of 8.7 million eukaryotic species).[13] Legally, nature is typically delineated as the domain of uncontrolled natural forces or unaltered environmental elements, as in "acts of nature" (vis major or force majeure), which denote events like earthquakes or storms arising solely from geophysical processes without human causation, absolving liability in contracts or torts.[14] In environmental jurisprudence, emerging "rights of nature" frameworks treat ecosystems as juridical subjects with inherent entitlements to exist, regenerate, and maintain integrity, as codified in ordinances like Ecuador's 2008 constitution granting rights to natural features such as rivers and forests.[15] In theological contexts, particularly within Abrahamic traditions, nature signifies the created order established by divine will, embodying original essences and laws imprinted at the genesis of the cosmos, as in the biblical account of creation where entities possess fixed kinds ordained for purposeful function.[16] This perspective views nature as a reflection of God's rational design, with inherent order (lex naturalis) discernible through observation, yet subordinate to supernatural revelation, distinguishing it from pantheistic conflations of nature with divinity.[6]Philosophical Perspectives on Nature
In ancient Greek philosophy, physis denoted the inherent source of motion, change, and stability within entities, distinguishing natural beings from artifacts produced by external craft. Aristotle articulated this in Physics Book II, defining nature as "a source or cause of being moved and of being at rest in that to which it belongs primarily, in virtue of itself and not accidentally," emphasizing an internal principle that unifies matter and form to actualize potentialities through efficient, material, formal, and final causes. This framework grounded natural processes in teleological causation, where entities strive toward their essential ends, as observed in biological growth and elemental tendencies like fire's upward motion, without reliance on supernatural intervention.[17] Aristotle's approach prioritized empirical observation of regular patterns to infer underlying principles, rejecting purely mechanistic or chance-based explanations in favor of immanent causal structures. Hellenistic Stoicism extended this by conceiving nature as a rational, interconnected cosmos governed by logos, an active principle ensuring providential order and necessitating alignment of human conduct with universal causality. Primary Stoic texts, such as those attributed to Zeno and Chrysippus (preserved in fragments), portray the universe as a living whole where all events form a deterministic chain, with virtue consisting in rational acceptance of this causal necessity rather than opposition to it.[18] Baruch Spinoza later radicalized this pantheistic strain in Ethics Part I, identifying God or Nature (Deus sive Natura) as the singular, infinite substance whose essence entails necessary existence and self-causation, rendering all modes—finite expressions of this substance—deterministically unfolded from divine attributes like extension and thought./Part_1) Spinoza's conatus doctrine posits that every entity strives to persevere in its being through causal interactions, deriving ethical imperatives from the immutable laws of this substance without positing dualistic mind-body divides or anthropomorphic deities.[19] Immanuel Kant, in Critique of Judgment (1790), addressed nature's apparent purposiveness through reflective teleological judgment, arguing that organisms exhibit reciprocal causality—parts as means and ends for the whole—necessitating a regulative principle of design for systematic empirical inquiry, though not constitutive of objective reality.[20] This bridges mechanistic physics with biological complexity, positing that while nature's laws are mechanical, judging organic unity as "as if" purposive facilitates scientific explanation without committing to actual final causes, as verifiable only through phenomenal experience bounded by noumenal limits.[21] Kant critiqued indiscriminate teleology as anthropic projection but upheld it heuristically to unify knowledge, influencing subsequent debates on whether nature's causal chains imply inherent directionality. Contemporary philosophy of nature revives causal realism, positing powers or dispositions as fundamental entities that ground laws and explanations beyond Humean regularities, aligning with first-principles reduction to basic mechanisms observable in empirical science.[22] Thinkers like Roy Bhaskar and modern dispositionalists argue that nature comprises stratified causal powers—active capacities for specific effects under conditions—enabling counterfactual robustness and explanatory depth, as in chemical reactions or quantum dispositions, contra regularity views that reduce causation to constant conjunctions lacking ontological depth.[23] This realism demands verifying powers through experimental interventions isolating tendencies, privileging evidence from repeatable phenomena over speculative metaphysics, and critiques reductionist empiricism for failing to account for emergent causal structures in complex systems like ecosystems or particle interactions.[24]Fundamental Physical Principles
Matter and Energy
Matter in the physical universe consists of elementary fermions, including quarks and leptons, which combine through the strong nuclear force to form composite particles such as protons and neutrons, and through electromagnetic interactions to constitute atoms and molecules. Ordinary matter, comprising approximately 5% of the universe's total energy density, is structured hierarchically: atoms feature a nucleus of protons (each containing two up quarks and one down quark) and neutrons (one up and two down quarks), surrounded by electrons (leptons). These building blocks interact via four fundamental forces—gravity, electromagnetism, weak nuclear, and strong nuclear—governing all natural phenomena from planetary formation to biological processes.[25] Energy, a conserved scalar quantity, quantifies a system's capacity to perform work or induce change, existing in interconvertible forms including kinetic (associated with motion), gravitational potential (due to positional configuration in a field), elastic potential (stored in deformed materials), thermal (random molecular motion), chemical (bond rearrangements), radiant (electromagnetic waves), electrical (charge separation), and nuclear (binding within atomic nuclei).[26] In natural systems, energy transformations drive observable processes: for instance, solar radiation (radiant energy) powers photosynthesis, converting it into chemical energy stored in glucose molecules, while tectonic movements release gravitational potential energy as seismic waves and heat.[27] The equivalence of mass and energy, formalized by Albert Einstein in 1905 as (where is energy, is rest mass, and is the speed of light at m/s), reveals that rest mass represents a concentrated form of energy, enabling conversions observed in stellar nucleosynthesis—where hydrogen fuses into helium, releasing 0.7% of input mass as energy sustaining stars for billions of years—and particle-antiparticle annihilations producing pure gamma rays.[28] This relation unifies conservation laws: in isolated systems, total mass-energy remains invariant, as verified experimentally in nuclear reactions where measured mass deficits correspond precisely to emitted energy via the equation.[29] In cosmology, the interplay of matter and energy shapes the universe's expansion: baryonic matter clusters under gravity to form galaxies, while radiation (early universe photons) and subsequent dark energy (inferred from accelerated expansion since approximately 1998 observations) dominate dynamics, though dark components remain undetected directly and their nature debated among physicists favoring empirical verification over theoretical priors. Empirical data from accelerators like CERN's Large Hadron Collider confirm these principles at scales from m (quark interactions) to cosmic observations spanning 13.8 billion years.Laws of Physics and Chemistry Governing Natural Phenomena
Conservation laws form the bedrock of physical and chemical processes in nature, ensuring that quantities such as energy, momentum, and mass remain invariant in isolated systems during interactions. The conservation of energy dictates that the total energy in a closed system persists unchanged amid transformations, underpinning phenomena from stellar fusion to ecological energy flows.[30] Similarly, conservation of linear and angular momentum governs the dynamics of colliding particles, orbiting bodies, and rotating weather systems, prohibiting perpetual motion machines and explaining the stability of planetary paths.[31] In chemistry, the law of conservation of mass, established by Antoine Lavoisier, asserts that the mass of reactants equals the mass of products in chemical reactions, a principle verified in processes like combustion and photosynthesis that cycle matter through Earth's biosphere.[32][33] Newton's three laws of motion describe how forces alter the state of rest or uniform motion of bodies, providing the causal framework for mechanical interactions in natural settings, such as wind-driven erosion or animal locomotion.[34] His universal law of gravitation posits that every mass attracts every other with a force proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of their distance, explaining gravitational phenomena including ocean tides induced by lunar pull and the orbital mechanics sustaining Earth's climate stability.[35] These laws, formulated in 1687, accurately predict trajectories over scales from falling raindrops to galactic rotations, with deviations only at relativistic speeds or quantum levels irrelevant to most macroscopic natural events.[36] The laws of thermodynamics regulate energy distribution and directionality in natural systems. The first law reaffirms energy conservation, stating that heat and work exchanges do not alter the system's total energy, as seen in geothermal heat flows or atmospheric convection.[37] The second law introduces entropy, positing that isolated systems evolve toward maximum disorder, rendering processes like diffusion in oceans or irreversible mixing in rivers spontaneous while prohibiting reverse flows without external input.[38] These principles, rooted in 19th-century empirical observations, elucidate why natural cycles, such as the water cycle, dissipate usable energy despite overall conservation. Electromagnetic laws, encapsulated in Maxwell's equations, govern electric and magnetic field interactions, manifesting in natural processes like lightning discharges and auroral displays.[39] These equations predict electromagnetic wave propagation, enabling solar radiation to drive photosynthesis and weather patterns via photon absorption and charge separations in thunderstorms. In chemistry, periodic law organizes elements by atomic number, predicting reactivity patterns that dictate mineral formation and biochemical pathways, such as oxidation-reduction reactions in soil weathering.[32] Collectively, these laws derive from empirical data and symmetry principles, yielding predictive power across natural scales without reliance on ad hoc adjustments.[40]Causal Mechanisms and First-Principles Explanations
The four fundamental forces—gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear—constitute the primary causal mechanisms underlying all physical interactions in nature. Gravity, described by Newton's law of universal gravitation , arises from the mutual attraction between masses and drives the large-scale structure of the universe, including the formation of planets from protoplanetary disks through gravitational collapse and the orbital dynamics of celestial bodies.[41] [42] This force, while weakest in magnitude, dominates over cosmic distances due to its infinite range and cumulative effect, causally explaining phenomena such as tidal forces on Earth's oceans and the aggregation of galaxies. Electromagnetism, unifying electric and magnetic fields via Maxwell's equations, governs atomic and molecular interactions; charged particles exchange photons, leading to Coulomb repulsion or attraction that stabilizes electron orbits and enables chemical bonding through shared electron clouds.[41] [43] The strong nuclear force, mediated by gluons between quarks, binds protons and neutrons within atomic nuclei, overcoming electromagnetic repulsion at short ranges (approximately meters) to prevent atomic disintegration; its residual effects hold nuclei together against electrostatic forces, enabling stable matter essential for all natural elements beyond hydrogen.[44] [45] The weak nuclear force, responsible for beta decay and neutrino interactions, facilitates processes like stellar nucleosynthesis, where it converts protons to neutrons in the proton-proton chain, causally powering stars through fusion while introducing asymmetry in particle-antiparticle production that contributes to the observed matter dominance in the universe.[43] [42] These forces operate hierarchically: nuclear forces at subatomic scales dictate elemental composition, electromagnetism scales up to molecular and macroscopic behaviors like light propagation and fluid dynamics, and gravity structures macroscopic systems. Conservation laws, derivable from spacetime symmetries via Noether's theorem, impose causal constraints on natural processes by ensuring quantities such as energy, linear momentum, angular momentum, and electric charge remain invariant in isolated systems.[31] For instance, conservation of energy prohibits perpetual motion machines and dictates that kinetic energy in falling objects converts to potential energy without loss, underpinning predictable trajectories in ballistic motion or planetary orbits. Momentum conservation, arising from translational invariance, causally explains recoil in particle collisions and the balanced propulsion of jets in atmospheric convection, while charge conservation enforces neutrality in chemical reactions, preventing spontaneous charge separation in equilibrium systems.[46] These principles, empirically verified across scales from quantum events to galactic dynamics, enable deterministic predictions of natural evolution absent external influences. Thermodynamic laws provide first-principles explanations for the directionality and efficiency of energy transformations in natural systems. The first law, stating that energy is conserved in thermodynamic processes (), causally links heat addition to internal energy changes, explaining why solar radiation heats Earth's surface without net creation of energy.[47] The second law introduces entropy as a measure of disorder, asserting that isolated systems evolve toward maximum entropy, which drives irreversible processes like heat diffusion from hot to cold regions, atmospheric mixing in weather patterns, and the dissipation of mechanical energy into thermal forms in frictional ecosystems.[47] This law causally precludes processes like spontaneous unmixing of gases, enforcing the arrow of time in natural phenomena; for example, it limits the efficiency of heat engines to the Carnot cycle, , reflecting empirical bounds observed in geothermal or oceanic thermal gradients. The zeroth law establishes thermal equilibrium via transitive temperature equality, foundational for measuring heat flows in environmental cycles.[48] At quantum scales, wave-particle duality and uncertainty principles introduce probabilistic causality, yet aggregate behaviors yield classical determinism; for instance, Schrödinger's equation governs electron probabilities in atoms, causally determining spectral lines observed in stellar spectra and photochemical reactions in photosynthesis. Chemical reactions, rooted in electromagnetic potentials, proceed via activation energies and transition states, with rate constants following Arrhenius form , empirically explaining combustion kinetics in wildfires or corrosion in geological weathering. These mechanisms, integrated across scales, reveal nature's causal realism: phenomena emerge from unbroken chains of force interactions and symmetry-derived invariants, without teleological intent, as substantiated by experimental validations in particle accelerators and astrophysical observations.[45][31]Earth's Geological and Physical Systems
Geological Evolution and Structure
The Earth accreted from a protoplanetary disk around the Sun approximately 4.54 billion years ago, with its formation involving the collision and aggregation of dust particles and planetesimals over tens of millions of years.[49] [50] Early bombardment by meteorites, including the Late Heavy Bombardment around 4.1 to 3.8 billion years ago, shaped the primordial crust, while internal heat from radioactive decay and residual gravitational energy drove planetary differentiation, segregating iron and silicates into distinct layers.[51] This process established the foundational structure: a thin crust averaging 5-70 kilometers thick, overlying a viscous mantle extending to about 2,900 kilometers depth, and a core divided into a liquid outer layer and solid inner sphere, with the core comprising roughly 32% of Earth's volume and generating the magnetic field through dynamo action.[52] [53] Geological evolution unfolded over the eons of the geologic time scale, beginning in the Hadean Eon (4.6-4.0 billion years ago), marked by molten surfaces and volatile outgassing that formed the initial atmosphere and oceans.[54] The Archean Eon (4.0-2.5 billion years ago) saw the stabilization of continental cratons and the onset of subduction-like processes, evidenced by komatiites and greenstone belts, though full plate tectonics likely initiated around 3 billion years ago.[55] During the Proterozoic Eon (2.5 billion to 541 million years ago), supercontinent cycles assembled and rifted landmasses like Rodinia, with oxygenation events altering surface chemistry. The Phanerozoic Eon (541 million years ago to present), divided into Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic eras, featured dynamic tectonics, including the assembly of Pangaea around 335 million years ago in the Carboniferous and its breakup starting 175 million years ago in the Jurassic, driven by mantle convection and slab pull at subduction zones.[56] [57] Plate tectonics, formalized in the 1960s, explains the lateral movement of lithospheric plates at rates of 1-10 centimeters per year, with boundaries classified as divergent (e.g., mid-ocean ridges forming new crust via seafloor spreading), convergent (subduction or collision building mountains like the Himalayas), and transform (lateral sliding, as along the San Andreas Fault).[58] Evidence includes symmetric magnetic striping on ocean floors, matching fossil distributions across continents, and earthquake distributions aligning with plate edges, confirming the theory's causal role in orogeny, volcanism, and continental reconfiguration over billions of years.[55] This framework, supported by seismic tomography and GPS measurements, underscores the convective mantle's influence on surface features, from rift valleys to island arcs, shaping Earth's dynamic geology without reliance on ad hoc mechanisms.[58]Atmosphere, Climate Dynamics, and Weather Patterns
The Earth's atmosphere consists primarily of nitrogen (78.08%), oxygen (20.95%), argon (0.93%), and carbon dioxide (0.04% by volume in dry air), with water vapor varying from near 0% to 4% depending on temperature and location.[59] This gaseous envelope, extending from the surface to the exosphere, is divided into layers based on temperature gradients and composition: the troposphere (0–12 km altitude, containing 75–80% of atmospheric mass where convection drives weather), stratosphere (12–50 km, featuring the ozone layer that absorbs ultraviolet radiation), mesosphere (50–85 km, coldest layer where meteors burn up), thermosphere (85–600 km, heating from solar activity), and exosphere (beyond 600 km, transitioning to space).[60] These layers result from differential absorption of solar energy and radiative cooling, with the troposphere's lapse rate—temperature decreasing about 6.5°C per kilometer—arising from adiabatic expansion of rising air parcels.[61] Climate dynamics emerge from the imbalance in solar heating: the equator receives more insolation than the poles due to Earth's spherical geometry and 23.5° axial tilt, establishing a meridional temperature gradient that powers global circulation.[62] The atmosphere redistributes heat via three overturning cells per hemisphere—Hadley cells (0°–30° latitude, driving trade winds through equatorward surface flow and poleward upper return), Ferrel cells (30°–60°, characterized by westerly surface winds and influenced by transient eddies), and polar cells (60°–90°, with easterly surface flow)—modulated by the Coriolis effect from Earth's rotation, which deflects air to the right in the Northern Hemisphere and left in the Southern.[62] The greenhouse effect, where water vapor (accounting for about 50% of the total effect), carbon dioxide (20%), and clouds (25%) absorb and re-emit infrared radiation, elevates global mean surface temperature by approximately 33°C above the effective radiating temperature of -18°C, with water vapor acting as a feedback amplifying initial forcings rather than a primary driver.[63] Oceanic heat transport, via currents like the thermohaline circulation, further balances latitudinal disparities, while volcanic aerosols and solar variability introduce shorter-term fluctuations.[64] Weather patterns represent short-term manifestations of these dynamics, featuring high- and low-pressure systems: cyclones (areas of low pressure with converging surface winds and rising air, fostering cloud formation and precipitation) and anticyclones (high-pressure zones with diverging surface winds and subsidence, often yielding clear skies).[65] Jet streams—narrow bands of strong westerly winds at 9–16 km altitude, speeds exceeding 100 km/h—steer mid-latitude storms along the polar front, where warm and cold air masses clash to produce fronts, squall lines, and extratropical cyclones.[66] Tropical weather includes hurricanes (intense cyclones with sustained winds over 119 km/h, fueled by latent heat release from ocean evaporation) and the Intertropical Convergence Zone (a band of thunderstorms near the equator).[67] These phenomena arise causally from buoyancy-driven convection, conditional instability (where moist air parcels rise supercritically), and vorticity generation via shear and convergence, with Earth's rotation constraining scales through Rossby radius limits.[62] Empirical observations from weather stations and satellites confirm recurring patterns, such as monsoon regimes tied to land-sea thermal contrasts and El Niño-Southern Oscillation cycles modulating global teleconnections.[68]Hydrosphere: Oceans, Rivers, Lakes, and Water Cycles
The hydrosphere comprises all water on Earth, including liquid, solid, and vapor forms, totaling approximately 332.5 million cubic miles (1.386 billion cubic kilometers), with over 96.5 percent contained in the oceans. Oceans cover about 71 percent of the planet's surface and hold roughly 97 percent of Earth's water, primarily as saline water with an average salinity of 35,000 parts per million. This vast reservoir influences global climate through heat storage and transport via currents, while freshwater components—rivers, lakes, and groundwater—constitute less than 3 percent, critical for terrestrial ecosystems and human use.[69][70][71] Ocean circulation features surface currents driven by winds and deep thermohaline circulation governed by water density variations from temperature and salinity gradients. The thermohaline "conveyor belt" moves warm equatorial water poleward and cold polar water equatorward, redistributing heat and modulating regional climates; for instance, it supplies warmth to higher latitudes, affecting sea ice formation and precipitation patterns. Disruptions to this system, such as from freshwater influxes altering salinity, could alter global temperature distributions, though empirical data emphasize density-driven causality over simplistic linear models.[72] Rivers originate from precipitation and snowmelt, channeling surface runoff through erosive channels that carve valleys and transport sediments to seas. The Nile River, at 4,132 miles (6,650 kilometers) long, ranks as the world's longest, followed closely by the Amazon at 4,000 miles (6,437 kilometers) and the Yangtze at 3,915 miles (6,300 kilometers). The Amazon discharges an average of 209,000 cubic meters per second, accounting for about 15 percent of global river freshwater input to oceans, underscoring its role in nutrient cycling and delta formation.[75][76] Lakes form in depressions from glacial, tectonic, or volcanic activity, holding standing freshwater or saline water depending on inflow, evaporation, and outlet dynamics. The Caspian Sea, the largest by area at approximately 371,000 square kilometers, is saline and endorheic, while Lake Baikal in Siberia contains the greatest freshwater volume at 23,013 cubic kilometers, representing about 20 percent of the world's unfrozen surface freshwater. Lake Superior, the largest freshwater lake by surface area (82,100 square kilometers), exemplifies Great Lakes hydrology, with water levels regulated by precipitation, evaporation, and connecting river flows. These bodies serve as sediment traps and biodiversity hotspots, with residence times varying from decades in large lakes to centuries in deep ones.[77][78] The water cycle, or hydrologic cycle, drives hydrospheric dynamics through solar-powered evaporation from oceans (about 86 percent of global evaporation) and land surfaces, followed by atmospheric transport, condensation into clouds, and precipitation returning water as rain or snow. Runoff feeds rivers and recharges aquifers, while infiltration and transpiration complete the loop, with ocean water residence times averaging around 3,200 years versus days for atmospheric vapor. This cycle maintains Earth's water balance, with evaporation exceeding precipitation over oceans and the reverse over land, ensuring net freshwater flux equatorward to sustain continental hydrology. Empirical measurements from gauging stations and satellites confirm these fluxes, revealing causal links between solar input, gravity-driven flows, and phase changes without reliance on unverified feedback assumptions.[79][80][81]Biosphere: Life and Ecosystems
Origins of Life and Evolutionary Processes
The earliest undisputed evidence for life on Earth consists of stromatolite fossils, layered structures formed by microbial mats, dating to approximately 3.48 billion years ago in the Dresser Formation of Western Australia.[82] Claims of even older microbial fossils, such as putative stromatolites from Greenland around 3.7 billion years ago, remain contested due to potential abiotic formation processes.[83] These structures indicate that prokaryotic life, likely simple bacteria or archaea, emerged shortly after Earth's oceans formed around 4.4 billion years ago, under a reducing atmosphere rich in hydrogen, methane, and ammonia but lacking free oxygen.[84] Abiogenesis, the emergence of life from non-living chemical systems, lacks a complete mechanistic explanation despite extensive research. The 1953 Miller-Urey experiment simulated a primordial atmosphere with electric sparks to mimic lightning, yielding amino acids and other organic compounds from gases like methane, ammonia, hydrogen, and water vapor; however, it assumed a highly reducing environment now questioned by geological evidence favoring a more neutral one with carbon dioxide and nitrogen, and it produced racemic mixtures (equal left- and right-handed molecules) alongside inhibitory tarry residues that would hinder further complexity.[85] Alternative hypotheses propose deep-sea hydrothermal vents as cradles for life, where alkaline fluids rich in hydrogen, methane, and minerals interact with acidic seawater, providing energy gradients and catalytic surfaces for organic synthesis; experiments simulating vent conditions have produced peptides and lipids, though scaling to self-replicating systems remains unproven.[86] The RNA World hypothesis posits self-replicating RNA molecules as precursors to DNA and proteins, supported by discovered ribozymes (RNA enzymes) capable of catalysis and replication in vitro, yet prebiotic RNA synthesis faces hurdles like nucleotide instability and the scarcity of ribose sugars in abiotic conditions.[87] Quantitative models estimate abiogenesis probabilities as low, with rates potentially requiring billions of years or rare cosmic conditions, underscoring unresolved challenges in achieving informational complexity from geochemical simplicity.[88] Once self-replicating entities arose, Darwinian evolution—descent with modification through natural selection—drove diversification, as articulated in Charles Darwin's 1859 On the Origin of Species. Natural selection operates via heritable variation (from mutations and recombination), overproduction of offspring, and differential survival/reproduction favoring traits enhancing fitness in specific environments; genetic drift and gene flow contribute in small or isolated populations.[89] The modern evolutionary synthesis, integrating Mendelian genetics post-1930s, explains macroevolution through accumulated microchanges, with mutation rates in bacteria around 10^{-6} to 10^{-9} per base pair per generation providing raw material.[90] Empirical support for common descent includes the fossil record's chronological progression, with transitional forms like Tiktaalik (fish-tetrapod intermediate, ~375 million years old) bridging aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates via limb-like fins and neck mobility, and Archaeopteryx (~150 million years old) exhibiting dinosaurian teeth, claws, and tail alongside avian feathers and wings.[91] Genetic evidence bolsters this: universal genetic code conservation across domains, shared endogenous retroviruses at orthologous genomic loci in primates (e.g., HERV-K insertions matching human-chimp divergence ~6-7 million years ago), and cytochrome c sequence similarities (e.g., 45% identity between humans and yeast) aligning with phylogenetic trees independent of morphology.[92] Observed instances, such as antibiotic resistance in bacteria evolving via selection on pre-existing mutations, and finch beak adaptations in the Galápagos documented over decades, demonstrate selection's causal efficacy in real time.[93] While gaps persist in the fossil record due to rarity of preservation, the cumulative patterns—biogeographic distributions, vestigial structures like whale pelvic bones, and predictive power in genomics—affirm evolution as the parsimonious explanation for life's diversity, without invoking unsubstantiated alternatives.[94]Microbial Life and Its Foundational Role
Microbial life encompasses prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea), unicellular eukaryotes (protozoa and fungi), and viruses, forming the most abundant and diverse biological entities on Earth. Estimates indicate approximately 4–6 × 10^{30} prokaryotic cells exist globally, with their collective biomass comprising about 70 gigatons of carbon (Gt C), representing roughly 15% of total living biomass and exceeding that of all animals combined.[95][96] This vast scale underscores microbes' dominance in subterranean soils, ocean depths, and atmospheric layers, where they outnumber macroscopic organisms by orders of magnitude and drive essential planetary processes. Microbes underpin nutrient cycling through decomposition of organic matter, converting dead biomass into inorganic forms accessible to plants and other autotrophs. Bacterial and fungal decomposers secrete enzymes that break down complex polymers like cellulose and lignin, releasing carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and other elements back into soils and waters.[97][98] Without this microbial activity, organic detritus would accumulate, halting the recycling of approximately 50–100 Gt of carbon annually from terrestrial and marine sources, leading to nutrient lockup and ecosystem stagnation.[99] In the nitrogen cycle, certain prokaryotes, known as diazotrophs, perform biological nitrogen fixation, enzymatically reducing atmospheric N_2 gas into ammonia usable by plants—a process accounting for over 90% of fixed nitrogen in natural ecosystems.[100] Symbiotic examples include rhizobial bacteria in legume root nodules, which supply fixed nitrogen in exchange for plant-derived carbohydrates, supporting crop yields equivalent to synthetic fertilizers in nitrogen-limited soils.[101] Free-living fixers like Azotobacter and cyanobacteria further sustain non-leguminous plants and aquatic primary production, preventing widespread nitrogen scarcity that would constrain global biomass productivity.[102] Microbes similarly regulate carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus cycles; for instance, sulfate-reducing bacteria in anoxic sediments mobilize sulfur, while methanogenic archaea produce methane, influencing atmospheric composition and climate feedbacks.[99] In marine systems, the microbial loop—where heterotrophic bacteria consume dissolved organic matter and serve as prey for protists—channels energy from primary production into higher trophic levels, sustaining fisheries that harvest billions of tons annually.[103] These roles extend to symbiosis, such as mycorrhizal fungi enhancing plant nutrient uptake in 80–90% of vascular species, amplifying forest productivity by factors of 2–10 times in phosphorus-poor soils.[104] Collectively, microbial processes form the causal foundation for biosphere stability, enabling the evolution and persistence of multicellular life by maintaining elemental flows without which higher organisms could not exist. Disruptions, such as antibiotic overuse or soil tillage, demonstrably impair these cycles, reducing ecosystem resilience and productivity.[105][106] Empirical models confirm that microbial contributions to biogeochemistry exceed those of any other group, rendering them indispensable for sustaining Earth's habitability.[96]Plant and Animal Kingdoms: Diversity and Interactions
The kingdom Plantae consists of approximately 391,000 known vascular plant species, of which about 369,000 are flowering plants (angiosperms), representing the most diverse group adapted to terrestrial environments through vascular tissues for water and nutrient transport.[107] Non-vascular plants, such as bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, and hornworts), number around 20,000 species and lack specialized transport systems, limiting their size and habitat to moist environments.[108] Gymnosperms, including conifers and cycads, comprise about 1,000 species with naked seeds, while seedless vascular plants like ferns total roughly 13,000 species, relying on spores for reproduction.[109] This diversity arises from evolutionary adaptations to photosynthesis as primary producers, enabling carbon fixation and oxygen release essential for supporting heterotrophic life. The kingdom Animalia encompasses over 1.5 million described species, with estimates of 7.8 million total, dominated by invertebrates in phyla such as Arthropoda (over 1 million species, including insects with jointed appendages) and Mollusca (snails, squid, and octopuses).[110] Vertebrates in Chordata, including fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, represent less than 5% of animal diversity but exhibit complex nervous systems and locomotion.[111] Arthropods' exoskeletons and segmentation facilitate diverse ecological roles, from predation to parasitism, while mollusks' soft bodies and radulae enable varied feeding strategies. Animal diversity stems from multicellularity, heterotrophy, and motility, driving consumption of plant-derived energy and shaping evolutionary pressures on both kingdoms.
Plant-animal interactions fundamentally structure ecosystems through mutualistic, antagonistic, and commensal relationships, with plants providing fixed energy and animals facilitating reproduction and nutrient cycling. Mutualism predominates in pollination, where animals transfer pollen among ~87.5% of the 352,000 angiosperm species, including insects like bees (visiting diverse flowers for nectar) and birds (specialized for tubular corollas), enhancing genetic diversity and yield.[112] Seed dispersal by animals affects 81% of tropical tree species, via ingestion and defecation by mammals and birds or external attachment to fur and feathers, promoting long-distance migration and forest regeneration beyond parental competition.[113] Antagonistic interactions include herbivory, where insects alone consume 20-30% of global plant biomass annually, exerting selective pressure for plant defenses like thorns, toxins, and secondary metabolites, which in turn drive animal detoxification adaptations.[114] Predation on herbivores indirectly benefits plants by regulating population densities, maintaining balance as seen in trophic cascades. Commensal examples involve animals sheltering in plant structures without harm, such as birds nesting in trees. These interactions, co-evolved over millions of years, underscore causal dependencies: plants' immobility necessitates animal mobility for propagation, while animal survival hinges on plant productivity, fostering biodiversity through reciprocal selection.[115]
Ecosystems, Biodiversity, and Natural Balances
Ecosystems consist of biotic communities of living organisms interacting with abiotic environmental components, forming self-regulating units where energy flows and nutrients cycle through trophic levels.[116] These systems operate via causal mechanisms such as photosynthesis driving primary production, herbivory transferring energy upward, and decomposition recycling organic matter back to producers.[117] Abiotic factors like soil composition, temperature, and water availability dictate species distributions and interaction strengths, with empirical models showing how variations in these influence overall dynamics.[118] Biodiversity encompasses genetic variation within species, diversity across species, and heterogeneity among ecosystems, underpinning resilience through functional redundancy and niche partitioning.[119] As of 2024, the IUCN Red List assesses 166,061 species, with approximately 8.7 million eukaryotic species estimated globally, though only about 1.2 million formally described, highlighting vast undiscovered variation concentrated in tropical regions.[120] Higher species richness correlates with enhanced ecosystem functioning, as evidenced by long-term grassland experiments where diverse plots maintained productivity under drought via complementary resource use.[121] Natural balances emerge from feedback loops, including predator-prey oscillations modeled by Lotka-Volterra equations, where prey population growth prompts predator increases that subsequently curb prey booms, preventing overexploitation.[122] Nutrient cycling, driven by microbial decomposers and detritivores, recycles elements like nitrogen and phosphorus, sustaining primary productivity without external inputs in closed systems.[123] Keystone species disproportionately shape these balances; for instance, sea otters in Pacific kelp forests prey on urchins, preserving algal beds that support diverse invertebrates and fish, with otter declines leading to trophic cascades.[124] Empirical studies indicate biodiversity buffers stability against perturbations, with meta-analyses showing diverse communities recover faster from disturbances due to species-specific tolerances and interactions.[125] However, stability also depends on trophic structure differences, where balanced diversity across levels—rather than sheer richness—prevents dominance shifts, as observed in aquatic food webs.[126] Succession processes restore equilibrium post-disturbance, progressing from pioneer species to climax communities via competitive exclusion and facilitation, as documented in forest regrowth patterns.[127] These mechanisms reflect causal realism in self-organization, where local interactions yield emergent homeostasis without teleological intent.Human-Nature Interrelationship
Historical Human Adaptation and Utilization of Nature
Early humans adapted to diverse natural environments through technological innovations that extended physiological limits, such as the controlled use of fire for warmth, cooking, and protection, with consistent evidence of reliance dating back approximately 400,000 years.[128] Bone tools from Moroccan caves indicate leather and fur processing for clothing as early as 120,000 years ago, enabling survival in varied climates during migrations.[129] Stone tools, including scrapers and blades, facilitated skin preparation and shelter construction, allowing anatomically modern Homo sapiens to inhabit regions from equatorial Africa to temperate zones.[130] Migration out of Africa by modern humans, beginning around 70,000 years ago with possible earlier dispersals as far back as 270,000 years, required adaptations to ice age conditions, deserts, and coastal routes, supported by seafaring capabilities inferred from archaeological sites in Southeast Asia dated to 68,000–86,000 years ago.[131] Hunter-gatherer societies utilized fire to alter landscapes for hunting drives and to process wild plants and megafauna, demonstrating early ecosystem manipulation without domestication.[132] These groups extracted resources opportunistically, such as flint for tools and animal hides for shelter, maintaining low-density populations tied to seasonal natural cycles. The Neolithic Revolution, commencing around 12,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent, marked a profound shift in utilization, as humans domesticated wheat, barley, sheep, and goats, transforming wild landscapes into managed fields through selective breeding and irrigation.[133] This adaptation reduced dependence on foraging, enabling sedentary settlements like Jericho (circa 9600 BCE), where mudbrick architecture harnessed local clay and timber.[134] Resource extraction intensified with early copper mining in Jordan's Faynan region around 10,000 years ago, yielding metals for tools via smelting fueled by charcoal from felled forests.[135] In ancient civilizations, such as Mesopotamia and Egypt by 3000 BCE, humans engineered levees and canals from river sediments to control floods, utilizing silt for fertile agriculture that supported urban populations exceeding 50,000.[136] Timber from cedar forests in Lebanon supplied Phoenician shipbuilding, facilitating maritime trade, while stone quarrying in Egypt produced limestone blocks weighing up to 80 tons for monumental structures like the pyramids.[137] These practices reflected causal dependencies on predictable natural rhythms—monsoons, Nile inundations—while incrementally depleting local resources, as evidenced by deforestation records in Sumerian texts.[138] Pre-industrial adaptations thus balanced exploitation with environmental constraints, fostering population growth from under 10 million around 10,000 BCE to 170 million by 1 CE through cumulative innovations in harnessing solar energy via agriculture and biomass.[139]Positive Human Contributions: Innovation, Conservation, and Stewardship
Human innovations in agriculture have enabled higher crop yields on existing land, thereby reducing pressure on natural habitats. The Green Revolution, initiated in the mid-20th century through high-yield crop varieties and fertilizers, is estimated to have spared 18 to 27 million hectares of potential cropland conversion, primarily forests, by boosting productivity without proportional land expansion.[140] Genetically modified crops, adopted globally since the 1990s, have further contributed by increasing yields and reducing insecticide use, leading to documented environmental gains such as enhanced species diversity in surrounding ecosystems and lower tillage-related soil erosion.[141][142] Conservation initiatives, particularly through legal protections and habitat restoration, have reversed declines in numerous species. In the United States, the bald eagle population recovered from 417 nesting pairs in 1963 to an estimated 316,700 individuals by 2018-2019, following bans on DDT and habitat safeguards under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, culminating in its delisting in 2007.[143][144] International efforts have similarly aided marine species; humpback whale populations rebounded due to 40 years of whaling regulations and protections, with four distinct populations now stable or increasing.[145] Sea turtle nesting has surged in areas with enforced beach and habitat protections, contributing to global rebounds in most populations as of 2025.[146] The establishment and management of protected areas exemplify stewardship by maintaining ecological integrity. National parks and reserves, such as those managed by the U.S. National Park Service, conserve intact ecosystems that support biodiversity recovery, with expansions enhancing protection against fragmentation.[147] In Peru, over 1 million hectares of Amazon forest achieved Forest Stewardship Council certification by 2023 through community-led sustainable practices, reducing illegal logging and preserving carbon stocks.[148] Reforestation projects have restored degraded lands, enhancing carbon sequestration and wildlife corridors. In Arkansas, a landowner initiative planted 36,000 hardwood seedlings across floodplain areas in the early 2020s, revitalizing habitats for native species with high survival rates.[149] Brazil's 20-year Amazon reforestation program converted 2,000 hectares of former pasture into productive forest by 2022, acting as a carbon sink and demonstrating viable degraded land recovery.[150] Sustainable forestry in regions like Menominee County, Wisconsin, employs selective harvesting and invasive species control, achieving over 90% success in ecosystem treatments while sustaining timber yields.[151] These efforts underscore causal links between targeted human interventions and measurable ecological improvements, grounded in empirical monitoring rather than unsubstantiated projections.Negative Human Impacts: Resource Extraction, Pollution, and Alterations
Human activities involving resource extraction have significantly altered natural landscapes and ecosystems. Deforestation, primarily driven by logging and agricultural expansion, resulted in an annual net loss of approximately 10 million hectares of forest globally between 2015 and 2020, though rates have slowed from higher levels in prior decades such as 17.6 million hectares per year in 1990–2000.[152][153] Mining operations, the fourth leading cause of deforestation, currently impact up to one-third of the world's forest ecosystems through habitat fragmentation, soil erosion, and contamination, with projections indicating increased pressure from rising demand for metals used in energy transitions.[154] Fossil fuel extraction, including offshore drilling, has caused acute ecological damage via spills; the 2010 Deepwater Horizon incident released about 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, leading to widespread mortality among marine species, including fish, birds, and mammals, and long-term disruptions to coastal food webs.[155] Similarly, the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill discharged 11 million gallons into Alaska's Prince William Sound, killing an estimated 250,000 seabirds and thousands of marine mammals while persisting in sediments for decades.[156] Pollution from industrial, agricultural, and consumer activities introduces persistent contaminants into air, water, and soil, impairing ecological functions and biodiversity. Ambient outdoor air pollution, largely from combustion sources tied to energy production and transportation, caused 4.2 million premature human deaths in 2019, with broader estimates linking total air pollution to 8.1 million deaths globally in 2021, including indirect effects on ecosystems via acid rain and ozone damage to vegetation.[157][158] In aquatic systems, plastic waste enters oceans at rates of 1 to 2 million tonnes annually according to refined estimates, accumulating in gyres and entangling or ingesting wildlife, while chemical leachates disrupt endocrine systems in fish and invertebrates.[159] Agricultural runoff, including fertilizers and pesticides, exacerbates eutrophication in rivers and coastal zones, creating hypoxic "dead zones" such as the Gulf of Mexico's, which spanned over 6,000 square miles in 2023 due to nutrient overloads fostering algal blooms that deplete oxygen and kill benthic organisms.[160] Landscape alterations through land conversion, infrastructure development, and hydrological modifications fragment habitats and disrupt natural processes. Agriculture accounts for the majority of terrestrial habitat loss, converting forests and grasslands into monocultures that reduce biodiversity by up to 75% compared to native ecosystems in affected areas.[161] Urbanization exacerbates this, with projected expansions leading to 11–33 million hectares of additional natural habitat loss by 2100 under various socioeconomic scenarios, disproportionately affecting vertebrate diversity in tropical regions.[162] Large-scale dams and river channelizations, such as those on the Mekong and Amazon basins, alter sediment flows and migratory patterns, reducing fish populations by 20–50% downstream and converting free-flowing systems into fragmented reservoirs that favor invasive species over natives.[163] These changes collectively diminish ecosystem resilience, as evidenced by accelerated species declines where cumulative pressures exceed natural recovery capacities.[164]Controversies in Environmental Narratives and Policy Responses
Environmental narratives frequently portray human impacts on nature as leading to irreversible catastrophes, prompting aggressive policy responses such as emissions reductions and habitat protections; however, empirical analyses reveal frequent divergences between projected doomsday scenarios and observed data, fueling debates over the proportionality of interventions. For instance, prominent predictions from the 1970s around the first Earth Day warned of widespread famines and resource collapses by the 1980s and 1990s due to overpopulation and climate shifts, yet global food production rose substantially, averting such outcomes through technological advances in agriculture.[165] Similarly, forecasts of an ice-free Arctic by the early 2010s or mid-century have not materialized, with satellite records showing variability but no collapse.[166] These discrepancies highlight how institutional sources, including academic and media outlets, have at times amplified risks beyond verifiable trends, potentially influenced by systemic incentives favoring alarm to secure funding and policy influence. In climate modeling, peer-reviewed assessments indicate systematic overestimation of warming rates, particularly in mid-tropospheric temperatures and during periods like 1998–2014, where observed global temperatures rose less than projected by many general circulation models.[167] [168] Recent evaluations of CMIP6 ensemble models confirm they exceed observed warming over 63% of Earth's surface, suggesting inflated climate sensitivity parameters that undermine confidence in long-term projections.[169] Countering narratives of unmitigated harm, satellite data from NASA reveal a 25–50% increase in global vegetation cover since the 1980s, with 70% attributable to CO2 fertilization enhancing photosynthesis, which has also contributed to a biophysical cooling effect offsetting 4.6% of anthropogenic warming.[170] [171] Sea level rise, often cited as accelerating due to thermal expansion and ice melt, shows no statistically significant global uptick in 95% of tide gauge locations when analyzed rigorously, with rates remaining steady at around 1.5–2 mm/year since the early 20th century rather than exhibiting the exponential surge predicted in some alarmist accounts.[172] Policy responses to these narratives, such as net-zero emissions targets by 2050, impose substantial economic burdens, with estimates pegging annual global costs at $3.5–4 trillion through mid-century, equivalent to redirecting 4–5% of world GDP annually toward transitions that may not proportionally reduce temperatures given model uncertainties.[173] [174] In jurisdictions like Germany, the Energiewende initiative has driven energy prices to Europe's highest levels—over €0.30/kWh for households—while failing to achieve emissions independence, as coal and gas backups persist to counter renewable intermittency.[175] Wind and solar variability necessitates grid-scale storage or fossil peaker plants, exacerbating reliability risks during low-output periods, as evidenced by increased blackout frequencies in high-renewable grids without adequate dispatchable capacity.[176] [177] Biodiversity controversies center on claims of a sixth mass extinction, with rates purportedly 1,000 times background levels; yet, methodologies like species-area modeling have been critiqued for overestimating losses by up to 160%, as they assume uniform habitat sensitivity without accounting for adaptive resilience or under-detection of extant populations.[178] Empirical fossil and genetic records indicate current extinction rates closer to 100–1,000 times pre-industrial baselines, not the apocalyptic figures often invoked, prompting accusations of "extinction denial" from conservation advocates but underscoring the need for data-driven rather than modeled extrapolations.[179] These debates reveal how policy prescriptions, including expansive protected areas and offsetting schemes, can overlook trade-offs like human displacement or economic stagnation in developing regions, where evidence suggests targeted stewardship yields better outcomes than blanket restrictions. Overall, while genuine environmental pressures exist, controversies arise from narratives prioritizing modeled hypotheticals over measured causal chains, leading to policies whose costs—fiscal, energetic, and social—frequently exceed empirically demonstrated benefits.Nature Beyond Earth
Extraterrestrial Geology and Atmospheres
Extraterrestrial geology examines the composition, structure, and dynamic processes shaping the surfaces and interiors of solar system bodies beyond Earth, primarily through impact cratering, volcanism, and cryovolcanism rather than widespread plate tectonics. The Moon's heavily cratered highlands and basaltic maria, formed by ancient lava floods between 3.8 and 3.1 billion years ago, illustrate impact-dominated evolution in a body lacking significant internal heat today. Mercury features similar cratered terrain interspersed with volcanic plains covering about 40% of its surface, evidence of past flood basalting driven by residual mantle convection. Mars displays shield volcanoes like Olympus Mons, which reaches 22 kilometers in height and 600 kilometers in width due to prolonged hotspot activity without crustal recycling, alongside the Valles Marineris rift system spanning 4,000 kilometers, likely formed by crustal stresses and erosion. Regions like Arabia Terra preserve evidence of thousands of super-eruptions between 4 and 3.5 billion years ago, releasing volumes equivalent to millions of cubic kilometers of material and altering regional topography.[180] Jupiter's moon Io exemplifies extreme tidal volcanism, where gravitational interactions with Jupiter and neighboring moons generate internal friction, sustaining over 400 active volcanoes that emit silicate lavas and sulfur plumes extending up to 500 kilometers, resurfacing the body at rates of 1-10 centimeters per year.[181] Saturn's moon Titan, with a density of 1.88 g/cm³ indicating a mix of 40-60% rock and ice, hosts diverse geomorphic features mapped by the Cassini mission, including equatorial dunes of tholin organics up to 300 meters high formed by wind erosion, mountain belts rising to 1 kilometer from tectonic compression of its icy crust, and possible cryovolcanic edifices extruding ammonia-water mixtures.[182] Venus's surface, dominated by low-relief volcanic plains covering 80% of the planet, suggests catastrophic resurfacing around 500 million years ago via widespread basaltic flooding, with ongoing activity inferred from transient hotspots and deformational features like tesserae highlands. Extraterrestrial atmospheres vary widely in density, composition, and dynamics, influenced by gravity, outgassing, and solar wind stripping. Airless bodies like the Moon and Mercury retain no significant atmosphere, exposing surfaces to micrometeorite bombardment and solar radiation. Mars possesses a thin carbon dioxide-dominated envelope (95.3% CO₂, surface pressure 0.006 bar), enabling dust storms that encircle the planet globally but insufficient for liquid water stability today. Venus harbors the solar system's densest atmosphere (96.5% CO₂, 92 bar pressure), trapping heat in a runaway greenhouse effect that maintains surface temperatures averaging 467°C, with upper-level winds exhibiting superrotation at 100 meters per second. Titan's atmosphere, thicker than Earth's at 1.5 bar and composed of 95% nitrogen with 5% methane, drives a methane hydrological cycle including rainfall, evaporation, and stable surface lakes of liquid hydrocarbons, fostering organic haze layers that obscure visible light.[183] Gas giant atmospheres, extending deep into hydrogen-helium envelopes (Jupiter: 90% H₂, 10% He), feature banded cloud decks of ammonia and water ice, with dynamical phenomena like Jupiter's Great Red Spot—a persistent anticyclone storm spanning 16,000 kilometers—sustained by internal convection and shear winds exceeding 100 meters per second. Saturn's atmosphere similarly comprises hydrogen and helium with trace ammonia, exhibiting hexagonal polar vortices at its north pole due to wave instabilities. Outer moons like Europa maintain tenuous oxygen atmospheres from radiolytic decomposition of surface ice, while Enceladus vents water vapor plumes from cryovolcanic geysers, contributing to a transient sodium-chloride envelope. These atmospheres reveal primordial compositions altered by escape processes, with lighter elements like hydrogen dominating in massive planets and heavier gases persisting on smaller bodies with stronger retention.[184]Potential for Life and Astrobiological Evidence
Astrobiology examines the potential for life beyond Earth by identifying environments with liquid water, energy sources, and organic compounds, essential prerequisites derived from Earth's biosphere. No extraterrestrial life has been confirmed, despite extensive searches, as emphasized by NASA, which states that no evidence of alien life exists to date.[185] Investigations focus on biosignatures—chemical or physical indicators potentially produced by life, such as disequilibrium gases or complex organics—while accounting for abiotic alternatives to avoid false positives.[186] In the solar system, Mars hosts the most scrutinized sites for past habitability. NASA's Perseverance rover, operating in Jezero Crater since February 2021, identified organic carbon-bearing mudstones in the Bright Angel formation in 2024, alongside redox-driven mineral associations suggestive of ancient microbial processes. These findings, including clay and silt deposits formed in a lake environment approximately 3.7 billion years ago, indicate multiple episodes of water activity conducive to life, but the organics could stem from non-biological chemistry.[187][188][189] Transient methane detections since 2003 remain unexplained but are not conclusive biosignatures, as geological or atmospheric processes could generate them.[190] Subsurface oceans on icy moons like Jupiter's Europa and Saturn's Enceladus represent prime targets for extant microbial life. Europa's ocean, estimated to hold twice Earth's water volume beneath a 10-30 km ice crust, receives tidal heating and may contain oxidants from surface irradiation, enabling chemosynthesis akin to Earth's deep-sea vents.[191] Enceladus ejects plume material from its ocean, revealing salts, silica particles, and hydrogen—potential energy sources for methanogenic microbes—but phosphorus availability, critical for life, requires further modeling confirmation.[192] Models suggest biosignatures could persist near ice-ocean interfaces, surviving radiation, yet direct sampling via missions like Europa Clipper (launched October 2024) or proposed Enceladus landers is needed to test habitability.[193] Beyond the solar system, over 5,700 exoplanets are known as of 2025, with dozens in habitable zones where liquid water might exist. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has probed atmospheres for biosignatures like oxygen-methane imbalances or dimethyl sulfide (DMS). On K2-18 b, a sub-Neptune 124 light-years away observed in 2023-2025, JWST detected DMS—a gas produced solely by life on Earth—alongside methane and carbon dioxide, hinting at biological activity in a possible ocean world.[194] However, experts caution that abiotic mechanisms, such as comet impacts or photochemical reactions, could explain these, and the planet's hydrogen-rich envelope challenges Earth-like habitability models.[195] No unambiguous biosignatures have been verified, with JWST's capabilities limited to large planets; smaller, Earth-sized targets in habitable zones remain observationally elusive.[196] The search underscores a high evidentiary threshold, as premature claims risk misinterpretation amid source biases toward sensationalism in media reports. Future missions, including sample returns from Mars (planned for the 2030s) and advanced telescopes, may provide definitive data, but causal realism demands ruling out geological or chemical origins before inferring life.[197][198]Cosmic Natural Phenomena and Universal Laws
Cosmic natural phenomena include expansive processes such as the ongoing expansion of the universe, observed through the redshift of distant galaxies, which indicates a Hubble constant of approximately 70 km/s/Mpc.[199] This expansion, accelerating due to dark energy comprising about 68% of the universe's energy density, shapes the large-scale structure including galaxy clusters and voids.[200] Stellar phenomena, like supernovae explosions that forge heavy elements through nucleosynthesis, release energies equivalent to the Sun's output over billions of years in mere seconds, dispersing material that forms subsequent stars and planets.[201] The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, discovered accidentally in 1965 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson at Bell Labs, represents relic photons from the Big Bang epoch, with a current temperature of 2.725 K and tiny fluctuations encoding the seeds of cosmic structure formation.[202] [203] These anisotropies, mapped precisely by satellites like COBE in 1992 and WMAP, confirm the universe's age at approximately 13.8 billion years under the Lambda-CDM model, though recent JWST observations of early massive galaxies have prompted debates over potential revisions upward to 26 billion years via alternative models challenging standard cosmology.[204] [205] Gravitational waves, first directly detected on September 14, 2015, by LIGO from merging black holes 1.3 billion light-years away, propagate as ripples in spacetime at the speed of light, carrying energy losses consistent with binary inspiral predictions.[206] Universal laws underpinning these phenomena derive from four fundamental interactions: gravity, governing large-scale dynamics via general relativity; electromagnetism, mediating light and plasma behaviors in stars; and the strong and weak nuclear forces, enabling fusion and radioactive decay in cosmic evolution.[42] General relativity, formulated by Einstein in 1915, accurately predicts phenomena like black hole event horizons and the 1919 solar eclipse light deflection, with gravitational wave detections providing strong-field confirmations absent in Newtonian approximations.[206] Quantum field theories describe particle interactions at subatomic scales, yet unification with gravity remains unresolved, as evidenced by ongoing quests for quantum gravity theories amid empirical successes in the Standard Model applied to cosmic ray spectra and early universe inflation.[207] These laws exhibit invariance under coordinate transformations, ensuring no preferred reference frames, a principle validated across scales from planetary orbits to cosmological horizons.[208]References
- https://gpm.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/education/videos/thermohaline-circulation-great-ocean-conveyor-belt
- https://www.ces.fau.edu/[nasa](/page/NASA)/resources/global-ocean-conveyor.php