Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Post-classical history
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Human history |
|---|
| ↑ Prehistory (Stone Age) (Pleistocene epoch) |
| ↓ Future |
In world history, post-classical history refers to the period from about 500 CE to about 1450 or 1500 CE, roughly corresponding to the European Middle Ages following the decline of the western Roman Empire. The post-classical period is characterized by the expansion of certain civilizations geographically, by ongoing wars fought over land, resources and religion, and by the development of trade networks between often-distant civilizations.[1][2][3][A] This period is also called—with various implications and emphases—the medieval era, the post-antiquity era, the post-ancient era, or the pre-modern era.
In Asia and the Middle East during this time, the spread of Islam helped produce a series of caliphates which fostered the Islamic Golden Age, leading to advances in science and greater trade between those in the Asian, African, and European continents. East Asia experienced the entrenchment of the power of a unitary and Imperial China, the dynastic governance and culture of which influenced Japan, Korea and Vietnam. Religions such as Buddhism and neo-Confucianism spread in the region,[5] while Christianity became entrenched in Europe and increasingly elsewhere. Gunpowder was developed in China during the post-classical era. The Mongol Empire conquered and controlled much of Europe and Asia, permitting more trade and cultural and intellectual exchange between the two regions.[6]
In total, the population of the world broadly doubled in this period of history: from approximately 210 million in 500 CE to some 461 million in 1500 CE.[7] The population generally grew slowly throughout the period, with mortality generally high and rapid major declines due to events including the Plague of Justinian, the Mongol invasions, and the Black Death.[8]
Historiography
[edit]Terminology and periodization
[edit]
Post-classical history is a periodization used by historians employing a world history approach to history, specifically the school developed during the late 20th and early 21st centuries.[3] Outside of world history, the term is also sometimes used to avoid erroneous pre-conceptions around the terms Middle Ages, Medieval Period, and the Dark Ages (see medievalism), though the application of the term post-classical on a global scale is also problematic, and may likewise be Eurocentric.[9] Academic publications sometimes use the terms post-classical and late antiquity synonymously to describe the history of Western Eurasia between 250 and 800 CE.[10][11]
The post-classical period corresponds roughly to the period from 500 CE to 1450 CE.[1][12][3] Beginning and ending dates might vary depending on the region, with the period beginning at the end of the previous classical period: Han China (ending in 220 CE), the Western Roman Empire (in 476 CE), the Gupta Empire (in 543 CE), and the Sasanian Empire (in 651 CE).[13]
The post-classical period is one of the five or six major periods world historians use:
- early civilization,
- classical societies,
- post-classical
- early modern,
- long nineteenth century, and
- contemporary or modern era.[3] (Sometimes the nineteenth century and modern are combined.[3])
Although post-classical is synonymous with the Middle Ages of Western Europe, the term post-classical is not necessarily a member of the traditional tripartite periodization of Western European history into classical, middle, and modern.
Approaches
[edit]
The historical field of world history, which looks at common themes occurring across multiple cultures and regions, has enjoyed extensive development since the 1980s.[14] However, World History research has tended to focus on early modern globalization (beginning around 1500) and subsequent developments, and views post-classical history as mainly pertaining to Afro-Eurasia.[3] Historians recognize the difficulties of creating a periodization and identifying common themes that include not only this region but also, for example, the Americas, since they had little contact with Afro-Eurasia before the Columbian exchange.[3] Thus researchers around the year 2020 emphasized that "a global history of the period between 500 and 1500 is still wanting" and that "historians have only just begun to embark on a global history of the Middle Ages".[15][16]
For many regions of the world, there are well established histories. Although medieval studies in Europe tended in the 19th century to focus on creating histories for individual nation-states, much 20th-century research focused, successfully, on creating an integrated history of medieval Europe.[17][18][19][15] The Islamic World likewise has a rich regional historiography, ranging from the 14th-century Ibn Khaldun to the 20th-century Marshall Hodgson and beyond.[20] Correspondingly, research into the network of commercial hubs which enabled goods and ideas to move between China in the East and the Atlantic islands in the West—which can be called the early history of globalization—is fairly advanced; one key historian in this field is Janet Abu-Lughod.[15] Understanding of communication within sub-Saharan Africa or the Americas is, by contrast, far more limited.[15]
Around the 2010s, therefore, researchers began to explore the possibilities of writing history covering the Old World, where human activities were fairly interconnected, and establish its relationship with other cultural spheres, such as the Americas and Oceania. In the assessment of James Belich, John Darwin, Margret Frenz, and Chris Wickham,
Global history may be boundless, but global historians are not. Global history cannot usefully mean the history of everything, everywhere, all the time. [...] Three approaches [...] seem to us to have real promise. One is global history as the pursuit of significant historical problems across time, space, and specialism. This can sometimes be characterized as 'comparative' history. [...] Another is connectedness, including transnational relationships. [...] The third approach is the study of globalization [...]. Globalization is a term that needs to be rescued from the present, and salvaged for the past. To define it as always encompassing the whole planet is to mistake the current outcome for a very ancient process.[21]
A number of commentators have pointed to the history of the Earth's climate as a useful approach to World History in the Middle Ages, noting that certain climate events had effects on all human populations.[22][23][24][25][26][27]
Global trends
[edit]The post-classical era saw several common developments or themes. There was the expansion and growth of civilization into new geographic areas; the rise and/or spread of the three major world, or missionary, religions; and a period of rapidly expanding trade and trade networks. While scholastic emphasis has remained on Eurasia there is a growing effort to examine the effects of these global trends on other places.[1] In describing geographic zones historians have identified three large self contained world regions, Afro-Eurasia, the Americas, and Oceania.[9][B]
Growth of civilization
[edit]
First was the expansion and growth of civilization into new geographic areas across Asia, Africa, Europe, Mesoamerica, and western South America. However, as noted by world historian Peter N. Stearns, there were no common global political trends during the post-classical period, rather it was a period of loosely organized states and other developments, but no common political patterns emerged.[3] In Asia, China continued its historic dynastic cycle and became more complex, improving its bureaucracy. The creation of the Islamic empires established a new power in the Middle East, North Africa, the Caucasus, and Central Asia. The Mali and Songhai Empires were formed in West Africa. The fall of Roman civilization not only left a power vacuum for the Mediterranean and Europe, but forced certain areas to build what some historians might call new civilizations entirely.[29] An entirely different political system was applied in Western Europe (i.e. feudalism), as well as a different society (i.e. manorialism). However, the once Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) retained many features of old Rome, as well as Greek and Persian similarities. Kievan Rus' and subsequently Russia began development in Eastern Europe as well. In the isolated Americas, the Mississippian culture spread in North America and Mesoamerica saw the building of the Aztec Empire, while the Andean region of South America saw the establishment of the Wari Empire first and the Inca Empire later.[30] In Oceania, ancestors of modern Polynesians were established in village communities by the 6th century, a gradual intensification of complexity took place. In the 13th century, complex states were established, most notably the Tuʻi Tonga Empire which collected tribute from many island chains in the greater region.[31]
Spread of universal religions
[edit]
Religion that envisaged the possibility that all humans could be included in a universal order had emerged already in the first millennium BCE, particularly with Buddhism. In the following millennium, Buddhism was joined by two other major, universalizing, missionary religions, both developing from Judaism: Christianity and Islam. By the end of the period, these three religions were between them widespread, and often politically dominant, across the Old World.[32]
- Buddhism spread from India into China and flourished there briefly before using it as a hub to spread to Japan, Korea, and Vietnam;[33] a similar effect occurred with Confucian revivalism in the later centuries.[32]
- Christianity had become the state church of the Roman Empire in 380, and continued spreading into northern and eastern Europe during the post-classical period at the expense of belief systems that Christians labelled pagan.[34] An attempt was even made to incur upon the Middle East during the Crusades. The split of the Catholic Church in Western Europe and the Eastern Orthodox Church in Eastern Europe encouraged religious and cultural diversity in Eurasia.[35]
- Islam began between 610 and 632, with a series of revelations to Muhammad. It helped unify the warring Bedouin clans of the Arabian Peninsula and, through a rapid series of Muslim conquests, became established to the west across North Africa, the Iberian Peninsula, and parts of West Africa, and to the east across Persia, Central Asia, India, and Indonesia.[36]
Outside of Eurasia, religion or otherwise a veneration of the supernatural was also used to reinforce power structures, articulate world views and create foundational myths for society. Mesoamerican cosmological narratives are an example of this.[9]
Trade and communication
[edit]
Finally, communication and trade across Afro-Eurasia increased rapidly. The Silk Road continued to spread cultures and ideas through trade. Communication spread throughout Europe, Asia, and Africa. Trade networks were established between western Europe, Byzantium, early Russia, the Islamic Empires, and the Far Eastern civilizations.[37] In Africa, the earlier introduction of the camel allowed for a new and eventually large trans-Saharan trade, which connected Sub-Saharan West Africa to Eurasia. The Islamic Empires adopted many Greek, Roman, and Indian advances and spread them through the Islamic sphere of influence, allowing these developments to reach Europe, North and West Africa, and Central Asia. Islamic sea trade helped connect these areas, including those in the Indian Ocean and in the Mediterranean, replacing Byzantium in the latter region. The Christian Crusades into the Middle East (as well as Muslim Spain and Sicily) brought Islamic science, technology, and goods to Western Europe.[34] Western trade into East Asia was pioneered by Marco Polo. Importantly, China began to influence regions like Japan,[33] Korea, and Vietnam through trade and conquest. Finally, the growth of the Mongol Empire in Central Asia established safe trade which allowed goods, cultures, ideas, and disease to spread between Asia, Europe, and Africa.
The Americas had their own trade network, but here trade was restricted by range and scope. The Mayan network spread across Mesoamerica but lacked direct connections to the complex societies of South and North America, and these zones remained separate from one another.[38]
In Oceania, some of the island chains of Polynesia engaged in trade with one another.[39] For instance, with outrigger canoes long-distance communication of over 2,300 miles between Hawaii and Tahiti was maintained for centuries before its disruption and separation.[40] Meanwhile, in Melanesia there is evidence of exchanges between mainland Papua New Guinea and the Trobriand Islands off its coast, most likely for obsidian. Populations moved westward until 1200, after which the network dissolved into much smaller economies.[41]
Climate
[edit]During post-classical times, there is evidence that many regions of the world were affected similarly by global climate conditions; however, direct effects in temperature and precipitation varied by region. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, changes did not all occur at once. Generally however, studies found that temperatures were relatively warmer in the 11th century, but colder by the early 17th century. The degree of climate change which occurred in all regions across the world is uncertain, as is whether such changes were all part of a global trend.[42] Climate trends appear to be more recognizable in the Northern than in the Southern Hemisphere however, there are instances where climate in areas without written records have been estimated, historians now believe the Southern Hemisphere became colder between 950 and 1250.[43]

There are shorter climate periods that could be said roughly to account for large scale climate trends in the post-classical period. These include the Late Antique Little Ice Age, the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age. The extreme weather events of 536–537 were likely initiated by the eruption of the Lake Ilopango caldera in El Salvador. Sulfate emitted into the air initiated global cooling, migrations and crop failures worldwide, possibly intensifying an already cooler time period.[44] Records show that the world's average temperature remained colder for at least a century afterwards.
The Medieval Warm Period from 950 to 1250 occurred mostly in the Northern Hemisphere, causing warmer summers in many areas; the high temperatures would only be surpassed by the global warming of the 20th/21st centuries. It has been hypothesized that the warmer temperatures allowed the Norse to colonize Greenland, due to ice-free waters. Outside of Europe there is evidence of warming conditions, including higher temperatures in China and major North American droughts which adversely affected numerous cultures.[45]
After 1250, glaciers began to expand in Greenland, affecting its thermohaline circulation, and cooling the entire North Atlantic. In the 14th century, the growing season in Europe became unreliable; meanwhile in China the cultivation of oranges was driven southward by colder temperatures. Especially in Europe, the Little Ice Age had great cultural ramifications.[46] It persisted until the Industrial Revolution, long after the post-classical period.[47] Its causes are unclear: possible explanations include sunspots, orbital cycles of the Earth, volcanic activity, ocean circulation, and man-made population decline.[48]
Timeline
[edit]This timetable gives a basic overview of states, cultures and events which transpired roughly between the years 200 and 1500. Sections are broken by political and geographic location.[49][50]

- Dates are approximate range (based upon influence), consult particular article for details
- Middle Ages Divisions, Middle Ages Themes Other themes
Eurasian trends
[edit]This section explains events and trends which affected the geographic area of Eurasia. The civilizations within this area were distinct from one another but still endured shared experiences and some development patterns.[51][52][53]
Feudalism
[edit]
In the context of global history, the label of feudalism has been used to describe any agricultural society where central authority broke down to be replaced by a warrior aristocracy. Feudal societies are characterized by reliance on personal relationships with military elites, rather than a bureaucracy with a state-supported professional standing army.[54] The label of feudalism has thus been used to describe many areas of Eurasia including medieval Europe, the Islamic iqta' system, Indian feudalism, and Heian Japan.[55] Some world historians generalize that societies can be called feudal if authority was fragmented, with a set of obligations between vassal and lord. After the 8th century, feudalism became more common across Europe. Even Byzantium, which had inherited the government of the Roman Empire, chose to devolve its military obligations into themes to increase the number of soldiers and ships available for military service during times of crisis.[56] There were similarities between European feudalism and the Islamic iqta', as both featured landed classes of mounted warriors whose titles were granted by a monarch or sultan.[57] Because of these similarities, it was common for societal structures to be preserved in the face of religious upheaval; for instance, after the Islamic Delhi Sultanate conquered large portions of India, it imposed higher taxes but otherwise left local feudal structures in place.[58]
Though most of Eurasia adopted feudalism and similar systems during this era, China employed a centralized bureaucracy throughout much of the post classical period, particularly after 1000.[59] A major factor that distinguished China from other regions was that local leaders were reluctant to self-identify by their current location; instead, they typically displayed an ambition to unite the country in times of disunity.[60]
Beyond a broad generalization, the usefulness of the term "feudalism" is debated by contemporary historians, as the daily functions of feudalism sometimes differed greatly between world regions.[54] Comparisons between feudal Europe and post-classical Japan have been particularly controversial. Throughout the 20th century, historians often compared medieval Europe to post-classical Japan.[61] More recently, it has been argued that, until roughly 1400, Japan balanced its decentralized military power with more centralized forms of imperial (governmental) and monastic (religious) authority. Only in the Sengoku period did there come to be fully decentralized power dominated by private military leaders.[62] Still other historians reject the term feudalism outright, challenging its ability to usefully describe societies either within or outside of medieval Europe.[63]
Mongol Empire
[edit]
The Mongol Empire, which existed during the 13th and 14th centuries, was the largest continuous land empire in history.[64] Originating in the steppes of Central Asia, the Mongol Empire eventually stretched from Central Europe to the Sea of Japan, extending northwards into Siberia, eastwards and southwards into the Indian subcontinent, Indochina, and the Iranian Plateau, and westwards as far as the Levant and Arabia.[65]
The Mongol Empire emerged from the unification of nomadic tribes in the Mongolia homeland under the leadership of Genghis Khan, who was proclaimed ruler of all Mongols in 1206. The empire grew rapidly under his rule and then under his descendants, who sent invasions in every direction.[66][67][68][69][70][71] The vast transcontinental empire connected east and west with an enforced Pax Mongolica allowing trade, technologies, commodities, and ideologies to be disseminated and exchanged across Eurasia.[72][73]
The empire began to split due to wars over succession, as the grandchildren of Genghis Khan disputed whether the royal line should follow from his son and initial heir Ögedei, or one of his other sons such as Tolui, Chagatai, or Jochi. After Möngke Khan died, rival kurultai councils simultaneously elected different successors, the brothers Ariq Böke and Kublai Khan, who then not only fought each other in the Toluid Civil War, but also dealt with challenges from descendants of other sons of Genghis.[74] Kublai successfully took power, but civil war ensued as Kublai sought unsuccessfully to regain control of the Chagatayid and Ögedeid families.[75]

The Battle of Ain Jalut in 1260 marked the high-water point of the Mongol conquests and was the first time a Mongol advance had ever been beaten back in direct combat on the battlefield.[75] Though the Mongols launched many more invasions into the Levant, briefly occupying it and raiding as far as Gaza after a decisive victory at the Battle of Wadi al-Khazandar in 1299, they withdrew due to various geopolitical factors.
By the time of Kublai's death in 1294, the Mongol Empire had fractured into four separate khanates or empires, each pursuing its own separate interests and objectives: the Golden Horde khanate in the northwest; the Chagatai Khanate in the west; the Ilkhanate in the southwest; and the Yuan dynasty based in modern-day Beijing.[76] In 1304, the three western khanates briefly accepted the nominal suzerainty of the Yuan dynasty,[77][78] but it was later overthrown by the Han Chinese Ming dynasty in 1368.[79] The Genghisid rulers returned to Mongolia homeland and continued rule in the Northern Yuan dynasty.[79] All of the original Mongol Khanates collapsed by 1500, but smaller successor states remained independent until the 1700s. Descendants of Chagatai Khan created the Mughal Empire that ruled much of India in early modern times.[79]
The conquests and the interactions the Mongol Empire had with western Eurasia are one of the more comprehensively researched areas for historians looking to define a globalized Middle Ages.[16]
Silk Road
[edit]
The Silk Road was a Eurasian trade route that played a large role in global communication and interaction. It stimulated cultural exchange; encouraged the learning of new languages; resulted in the trade of many goods, such as silk, gold, and spices; and also spread religion and disease.[80] It is even claimed by some historians – such as Andre Gunder Frank, William Hardy McNeill, Jerry H. Bentley, and Marshall Hodgson – that the Afro-Eurasian world was loosely united culturally, and that the Silk Road was fundamental to this unity.[80] This major trade route began with the Han dynasty of China, connecting it to the Roman Empire and any regions in between or nearby. At this time, Central Asia exported horses, wool, and jade into China for the latter's silk; the Romans would trade for the Chinese commodity as well, offering wine in return.[81] The Silk Road would often decline and rise again in trade from the Iron Age to the post-classical era. Following one such decline, it was reopened in Central Asia by Han dynasty general Ban Chao during the 1st century.[82]
There were vulnerabilities as well to changing political situations. The rise of Islam changed the Silk Road, because Muslim rulers generally closed the Silk Road to Christian Europe to an extent that Europe would be cut off from Asia for centuries. Specifically, the political developments that affected the Silk Road included the emergence of the Turks, the political movements of the Byzatine and Sasanian Empires, and the rise of the Arabs, among others.[83]

The Silk Road flourished again in the 13th century during the reign of the Mongol Empire, which through conquest had brought stability in Central Asia comparable to the Pax Romana.[84] It was claimed by a Muslim historian that Central Asia was peaceful and safe to transverse.
"(Central Asia) enjoyed such a peace that a man might have journeyed from the land of sunrise to the land of sunset with a golden platter upon his head without suffering the least violence from anyone."[85]
As such, trade and communication between Europe, East Asia, South Asia, and West Asia required little effort. Handicraft production, art, and scholarship prospered, and wealthy merchants enjoyed cosmopolitan cities. Notable Travelers including Ibn Battuta, Rabban Bar Sauma, and Marco Polo traveled across North Africa and Eurasia freely, those that left accounts of their experiences inspired future adventurers.[85] The Silk Road was also a major factor in spreading religion across Afro-Eurasia. Muslim teachings from Arabia and Persia reached East Asia. Buddhism spread from India, to China, to Central Asia. One significant development in the spread of Buddhism was the carving of the Gandhara School in the cities of ancient Taxila and the Peshwar, allegedly in the mid 1st century.[82] In addition to commercial travel was the esteem of pilgrimage that existed across all of Afro-Eurasia, in the words of world historian R. I. Moore "if any single institution 'made' the Eurasian Middle Ages it was pilgrimage."[53][86][87]
Nevertheless, after the 15th century, the Silk Road disappeared from regular use.[84] This was primarily a result from the growing sea travel pioneered by Europeans, which allowed the trade of goods by sailing around the southern tip of Africa and into the Indian Ocean.[84]
The route was vulnerable to spreading plague. The Plague of Justinian originated in East Africa and had a major outbreak in Europe in 542 causing the deaths of a quarter of the Mediterranean's population. Trade between Europe, Africa, and Asia along the route was at least partially responsible for spreading the plague.[88] Eight centuries later, the Silk Road trade played a role in spreading the infamous Black Death. The disease, spread by rats, was carried by merchant ships sailing across the Mediterranean that brought the plague back to Sicily, causing an epidemic in 1347.[89]
Plague and disease
[edit]In the Eurasian world, disease was an inescapable part of daily life. Europe in particular suffered minor outbreaks of disease every decade during the period. Using both land and sea routes, devastating pandemics could spread far beyond their initial focal point.[90] Tracking the origin of massive bubonic plagues and their potential spread between Eastern and Western Eurasia has been academically contentious.[91] Besides bubonic plague, other diseases including smallpox also spread across cultural regions.[92]
The first plague
[edit]The first plague pandemic caused by Yersinia pestis began with the 541–549 Plague of Justinian. The origin of the plague appears to have been the Tian Shan mountains in Kyrgyzstan.[93] But the origin of the 541–549 epidemic remains uncertain: some historians postulate East Africa as a possible geographical origin.[94]
There is no record of a disease with the characteristics of Yersinia pestis breaking out in China before its appearance in Pelusium Egypt. The plague spread to Europe and West Asia, with a possible spread into East Asia.[C] Established urban civilizations were massively depopulated; the economies and social fabric of established empires were severely destabilized.[96] Rural societies, while still facing horrific death tolls, saw fewer socioeconomic effects.[97] In addition, no evidence has been found of bubonic plague in India before 1600.[96] Nevertheless, it is likely that the trauma of disease (and other natural disasters) was a major cause of profound religious and political changes in Eurasia. Different authorities reacted to disease outbreaks with strategies that they believed would best protect their power. The Catholic Church in France spoke of healing miracles; Confucian bureaucrats asserted that sudden deaths of Chinese emperors represented the loss of a dynasty's Mandate of Heaven, shifting blame away from themselves. The severe loss of manpower in the Byzantine and Sasanian Empires contributed to early Muslim conquests in the region.[95] In the long term, overland trade in Eurasia diminished, as coastal Indian Ocean trade became more frequent. There were recurrent aftershocks of the Plague of Justinian until around 750, after which many nations saw an economic recovery.[98]
Second plague pandemic until 1500
[edit]
Six centuries later, a relative (but not a direct descendant) of Yersinia Pestis rose to afflict Eurasia: the Black Death. The first instance of the second plague pandemic was between 1347 and 1351. It killed variously between 25% and 50% of populations.[99] Traditionally many historians believed the Black Death started in China and was then spread westward by invading Mongols who inadvertently carried infected fleas and rats with them.[91] Although there is no concrete historical evidence for this theory, the plague is considered endemic on the steppe.[100] Currently there is extensive historiography of the Black Death's effects in Europe and the Islamic world, but beyond Western Eurasia direct evidence for Black Death's presence is lacking.[101][102] The Bulletin of the History of Medicine explored the potential linking of known 14th century epidemics in Asia with the plague. One example is the Deccan Plateau, where much of the Delhi Sultanate's army suddenly died of a sickness in 1334. As this was 15 years before Europe's Black Death but little detail about the symptoms, it is unlikely that this was an instance of bubonic plague. Meanwhile, Yuan China suffered from major epidemics in the mid-14th century, including a recorded 90% death rate in Hebei Province.[91] As with the Deccan event, surviving accounts do not describe symptoms; so historians are left to speculate.[91] Perhaps these outbreaks were not the Black Death but instead some other disease already common to East Asia at the time, such as typhus, smallpox, or dysentery.[91][103] Compared to Western reactions to the Black Death, Chinese records that do mention the epidemics are relatively muted, indicating that epidemics were a routine occurrence. Historians consider the hypothesis of a Chinese origin of a westward-moving plague unlikely given the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire and the 5,000-mile journey between China proper and Crimea through sparsely populated Central Asia.[91]
The aftershocks of the plague continued to affect populations well into the early modern period. In Western Europe, the devastating loss of people created lasting changes. Wage labor began to rise in Western Europe and there was more emphasis on labor-saving machines and mechanisms. Slavery, which had almost vanished from medieval Europe, returned and was one of the reasons for early Portuguese exploration after 1400. The adoption of Arabic numerals may have been partially caused by the plague.[104] Importantly, many economies became specialist, producing only certain goods, seeking expansion elsewhere for exotic resources and slave labor. While typically Western European expansion as a result of the Black Death is most discussed, Islamic countries including the Ottoman Empire also partook in land-based expansionism and used their own slave trade.[105]
Science
[edit]
The term post-classical science is often used in academic circles and in college courses to combine the study of medieval European science and medieval Islamic science due to their interactions with one another.[106] However scientific knowledge also spread westward by trade and war from Eastern Eurasia, particularly from China by Arabs. The Islamic world also took medical knowledge from South Asia.[107]
In the Western world and in Islamic realms, much emphasis was placed on preserving the rationalist Greek tradition of figures such as Aristotle. In the context of science within Islam there are questions as to whether Islamic scientists simply preserved accomplishments from classical antiquity or built upon earlier Greek advances.[108][109] Regardless, classical European science was brought back to the Christian kingdoms due to the experience of the Crusades.[110]
As a result of Persian trade in China, and the battle of the Talas River, Chinese innovations entered the Islamic intellectual world.[111] These include advances in astronomy and in papermaking.[112][113] Paper-making spread through the Islamic world as far west as Islamic Spain, before paper-making was acquired for Europe by the Reconquista.[114] There is debate about transmission of gunpowder regarding whether the Mongols introduced Chinese gunpowder weapons to Europe or whether gunpowder weapons were independently invented in Europe.[115][116] In the Mongol Empire, information from diverse cultures was brought together for large projects: for instance in 1303 the Mongol Yuan dynasty combined Chinese and Islamic cartography to make a map that likely included all of Eurasia including western Europe. This "Eurasia map" is now lost, but it influenced Chinese and Korean geographical knowledge centuries later.[103] It is apparent that within Eurasia transfer of information between world cultures did occur, usually through translations of written documents.[51]
Literature and the arts
[edit]
Within Eurasia, there were four major civilization groups that had literate cultures and created literature and arts, including Europe, West Asia, South Asia, and East Asia. Southeast Asia could be a possible fifth category but was influenced heavily from both South and East Asia literal cultures. All four cultures in post-classical times used poetry, drama, and prose. Throughout the period and until the 19th century poetry was the dominant form of literary expression. In West Asia, South Asia, Europe, and China, great poetic works often used figurative language. Examples include, the Sanskrit Shakuntala, the Arabic Thousand and one nights, Old English Beowulf and works by the Chinese Du Fu and the Persian Rumi. In Japan, prose uniquely thrived more than in other geographic areas. The Tale of Genji is considered the world's first realistic novel written in the 9th century.[117]
Musically, most regions of the world only used monophonic melodies as opposed to harmony. Medieval Europe was the lone exception to this rule, developing harmonic music in the 14th/15th century as musical culture transitioned form sacred music (meant for the church) to secular music.[118] South Asian and West Asian music were similar to each other for their use of microtone. East Asian music shared some similarities with European music by using twelve tones and employing scales, but differed in the number of scales used- 5 for the former and seven for the latter[119]
History by region
[edit]Africa
[edit]
During the post-classical era, Africa was both culturally and politically affected by the introduction of Islam and the Arab empires.[120] This was especially true in the north, the Sudan, and the east coast. However, this conversion was not complete nor uniform among different areas, and the low-level classes hardly changed their beliefs at all.[121] Prior to the migration and conquest of Muslims into Africa, much of the continent was dominated by diverse societies of varying sizes and complexities. These were ruled by kings or councils of elders who would control their constituents in a variety of ways. Most of these peoples practiced spiritual, animistic religions. Africa was culturally separated between Saharan Africa (which consisted of North Africa and the Sahara Desert) and sub-Saharan Africa (everything south of the Sahara). Sub-Saharan Africa was further divided into the Sudan, which covered everything north of Central Africa, including West Africa. The area south of the Sudan was primarily occupied by the Bantu peoples who spoke the Bantu language. From 1100 onward, Christian Europe and the Islamic world became dependent on Africa for gold.[122]
After approximately 650 urbanization expanded for the first time beyond the ancient kingdoms Aksum and Nubia. African civilizations can be divided into three categories based on religion:[123][124]
- Christian civilizations on the Horn of Africa
- Islamic civilizations which formed in the Niger River Valley and on the Swahili Coast
- Traditional societies which adhered to native African religions
Sub-Saharan Africa was part of two large, separate trading networks, the trans-Saharan trade that bridged commerce between West and North Africa. Due to the huge profits from trade native African Islamic empires arose, including those of Ghana, Mali, and Songhai.[125] In the 14th century, Mansa Musa of Mali may have been the wealthiest person of his time.[126] Within Mali, the city of Timbuktu was an international center of science and well known throughout the Islamic world, particularly from the University of Sankoré. East Africa was part of the Indian Ocean trade network, which included both Arab ruled Islamic cities on the East African Coast such as Mombasa and traditional cities such as Great Zimbabwe which exported gold, copper and ivory to markets in the Middle East, South Asia, and Southeast Asia.[122]
Europe
[edit]In Europe, Western civilization reconstituted after the fall of the Western Roman Empire into the period now known as the Early Middle Ages (500–1000). The Early Middle Ages saw a continuation of trends begun in late antiquity: depopulation, deurbanization, and increased barbarian invasion.[127]
From the 7th until the 11th centuries, Arabs, Magyars, and Norse were all threats to the Christian Kingdoms that killed thousands of people over centuries.[128] Raiders however, also created new trading networks.[129] In Western Europe, the Frankish king Charlemagne attempted to kindle the rise of culture and science in the Carolingian Renaissance.[130] In 800, Charlemagne founded the Holy Roman Empire in attempt to resurrect ancient Rome.[131] The reign of Charlemagne attempted to kindle a rise of learning and literacy in what has become known as the Carolingian Renaissance.[132]
In Eastern Europe, the Eastern Roman Empire survived in what is now called the Byzantine Empire, which created the Code of Justinian that inspired the legal structures of modern European states.[133] Overseen by Eastern Orthodox emperors, in the 9th–10th centuries the Byzantine Eastern Orthodox Church Christianized the First Bulgarian Empire and Kievan Rus', the cultural and political ancestors to modern-day Bulgaria and North Macedonia, on the one hand, and Russia and Ukraine, on the other.[134][135] Byzantium flourished as the leading power and trade center in its region in the Macedonian Renaissance until it was overshadowed by Italian city-states and the Islamic Ottoman Empire near the end of the Middle Ages.[136][137]

Later in the period, the creation of the feudal system allowed greater degrees of military and agricultural organization. There was sustained urbanization in northern and western Europe.[57] Later developments were marked by manorialism and feudalism, and evolved into the prosperous High Middle Ages.[57] After 1000 the Christian kingdoms that had emerged from Rome's collapse changed dramatically in their cultural and societal character.[129]
During the High Middle Ages (c. 1000–1300), Christian-oriented art and architecture flourished and the Crusades were mounted to recapture the Holy Land from Muslim control.[138] The influence of the emerging nation-state was tempered by the ideal of an international Christendom and the presence of the Catholic Church in all western kingdoms.[139] The codes of chivalry and courtly love set rules for proper behavior, while the Scholastic philosophers attempted to reconcile faith and reason.[110] The age of Feudalism would be dramatically transformed by the cataclysm of the Black Death and its aftermath.[140] This time would be a major underlying cause for the Renaissance. By the turn of the 16th century European or Western civilization would be engaging in the Age of Discovery.[141]
The term "Middle Ages" first appears in Latin in the 15th century and reflects the view that this period was a deviation from the path of classical learning, a path supposedly reconnected by Renaissance scholarship.[142]
West and Central Asia
[edit]The Arabian Peninsula and the surrounding Middle East and Near East regions saw dramatic change during the post-classical era caused primarily by the spread of Islam and the establishment of the Arab caliphates.[143]

In the 5th century, the Middle East was separated by empires and their spheres of influence; the two most prominent were the Persian Sasanian Empire, centered in what is now Iran, and the Byzantine Empire in Anatolia (modern-day Turkey). The Byzantines and Sasanians fought with each other continually, a reflection of the rivalry between the Roman Empire and the Persian Empire seen during the previous five hundred years.[144] The fighting weakened both states, leaving the stage open to a new power.[145] Meanwhile, the nomadic Bedouin tribes who dominated the Arabian desert saw a period of tribal warfare for scarce resources and a familiarity with Abrahamic religions or monotheism.[146]
While the Byzantine and Sasanian Empires were both weakened by the Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628, a new power in the form of Islam grew in the Middle East under Muhammad in Medina. In a series of rapid Muslim conquests, the Rashidun army, led by the caliphs and skilled military commanders such as Khalid ibn al-Walid, swept through most of the Middle East, taking more than half of Byzantine territory in the Arab–Byzantine wars and completely engulfing Persia in the Muslim conquest of Persia.[147] It would be the Arab caliphates of the Middle Ages that would first unify the entire Middle East as a distinct region and create the dominant ethnic identity that persists today. These caliphates included the Rashidun, Umayyad, and Abbasid Caliphates, along with the later Turkic-based Seljuk Empire.[148]

After Muhammad introduced Islam, it jump-started Middle Eastern culture into an Islamic Golden Age, inspiring achievements in architecture, the revival of old advances in science and technology, and the formation of a distinct way of life.[149] Muslims saved and spread Greek advances in medicine, algebra, geometry, astronomy, anatomy, and ethics that would later find their way back to Western Europe.[150]
The dominance of the Arabs came to a sudden end in the mid-11th century with the arrival of the Seljuk Turks, migrating south from the Turkic homelands in Central Asia. They conquered Persia, Iraq (capturing Baghdad in 1055), Syria, Palestine, and the Hejaz.[151] This was followed by a series of Christian Western Europe invasions. The fragmentation of the Middle East allowed joint European forces mainly from England, France, and the emerging Holy Roman Empire, to enter the region.[152] In 1099 the knights of the First Crusade captured Jerusalem and founded the Kingdom of Jerusalem, which survived until 1187, when Saladin retook the city. Smaller crusader fiefdoms survived until 1291.[153] In the early 13th century, a new wave of invaders, the armies of the Mongol Empire, swept through the region, sacking Baghdad in the siege of Baghdad and advancing as far south as the border of Egypt in what became known as the Mongol conquests.[154] The Mongols eventually retreated in 1335, but the chaos that ensued throughout the empire deposed the Seljuk Turks. In 1401, the region was further plagued by the Turko-Mongol, Timur, and his ferocious raids. By then, another group of Turks had arisen as well, the Ottomans.[155]
South Asia
[edit]There has been difficulty applying the word "medieval" or "post-classical" to the history of South Asia. This section follows historian Stein Burton's definition that corresponds from the 8th century to the 16th century, more or less following the same time frame of the post-classical period and the European Middle Ages.[156]

Until the 13th century, there was no less than 20 to 40 different states on the Indian subcontinent which hosted a variety of cultures, languages, writing systems and religions.[157] At the beginning of the time period Buddhism was predominant throughout the area with the short-lived Pala Empire on the Indo-Gangetic Plain sponsoring the faith's institutions. One such institution was the Buddhist Nalanda mahavihara in modern-day Bihar, a center of scholarship that brought the divided South Asia onto the global intellectual stage. Another accomplishment was the invention of the Chaturanga game which later was exported to Europe and became chess.[158]
In South India, the Hindu kingdom of Chola gained prominence with an overseas empire that controlled parts of modern-day Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Indonesia as oversees territories and accelerated the spread of Hinduism into the historic culture of these places.[159] In this time period, neighboring areas such as Afghanistan, Tibet, and Myanmar were under South Asian influence.[160]
From 1206 onward, a series of Turkic invasions from modern-day Afghanistan and Iran conquered massive portions of North India, founding the Delhi Sultanate which remained supreme until the 16th century.[58] Buddhism declined in South Asia vanishing in many areas but Hinduism survived and reinforced itself in areas conquered by Muslims. In the far south, the Vijayanagara Empire was not conquered by any Muslim state in the period. The turn of the 16th century would see the rise of a new Islamic empire – the Mughals and the establishment of European trade posts by the Portuguese.[161]
Southeast Asia
[edit]
From the 8th century onward, Southeast Asia stood to benefit from the trade taking place between South Asia and East Asia, numerous kingdoms arose in the region due to the flow of wealth passing through the Strait of Malacca. While Southeast Asia had numerous outside influences including Indian and Chinese Civilization, local cultures strove to cement their own unique identities.[162] North Vietnam (known as Dai Viet) was culturally closer to China for centuries due to conquest.[163]
Since rule from the third century BCE, North Vietnam continued to be subjugated by Chinese states, although they continually resisted periodically. There were three periods of Chinese domination that spanned near 1100 years. The Vietnamese gained long lasting independence in the 10th century when China was divided with Tĩnh Hải quân and the successor Đại Việt. Nonetheless, even as an independent state a sort of begrudging Sinicization occurred. South Vietnam was governed by the ancient Hindu Champa Kingdom but was annexed by the Vietnamese in the 15th century.[164]
The spread of Hinduism, Buddhism, and maritime trade between China and South Asia created the foundation for Southeast Asia's first major empires; including the Khmer Empire from Cambodia and Srivijaya from Indonesia. During the Khmer Empire's height in the 12th century the city of Angkor Thom was among the largest of the pre-modern world due to its water management. King Jayavarman II constructed over a hundred hospitals throughout his realm.[165] Nearby rose the Pagan Empire in modern-day Burma, using elephants as military might.[166] The construction of the Buddhist Shwezigon Pagoda and its tolerance for believers of older polytheistic gods helped Theravada Buddhism become supreme in the region.[166] In Indonesia, Srivijaya from the 7th through 14th century was a thalassocracy that focused on maritime city states and trade. Controlling the vital choke points of the Sunda and Malacca Straits it became rich from trade ranging from Japan through Arabia.

Gold, ivory, and ceramics were all major commodities traveling through port cities. The empire was also responsible for the construction of wonders such as Borobudur. During this time Indonesian sailors crossed the Indian Ocean; evidence suggests that they may have colonized Madagascar.[167] Indian culture spread to the Philippines, likely through Indonesian trade resulting in the first documented use of writing in the archipelago and Indianized kingdoms.[168]
Over time, changing economic and political conditions elsewhere and wars weakened the traditional empires of Southeast Asia. While the Mongol invasions did not directly annex Southeast Asia, the war-time devastation paved way for the rise of new nations. In the 14th century the Khmer Empire was uprooted by persistent years of war - losing the functionality and engineering knowledge of its advanced water management system.[169] Srivijaya was overtaken by the Majapahit.[170] Islamic missionaries and merchants arrived eventually leading to Islamization in Indonesia.[171][D]
East Asia
[edit]
The time frame of 500–1500 in East Asia's history and China in particular has been proposed as a possible classification for the region's history within the context of global post-classical history.[173] Discussions within Columbia University's Association of Asian studies have postulated that similarities between China and other regions of Eurasia during post-classical times have often been overlooked.[174][E] Typically the English language histography of Japan postulates that its 'medieval period' began as late as 1185.[175][F]
During this period the Eastern empires continued to expand through trade, migration and conquests of neighboring areas. Japan and Korea went under the process of voluntary Sinicization, or the impression of Chinese cultural and political ideas.[176][177][178]
Korea and Japan sinicized because their ruling class were largely impressed by China's bureaucracy.[179] The major influences China had on these countries were the spread of Confucianism, the spread of Buddhism, and the establishment of centralized governance. Throughout East Asia, Buddhism was most visible in monasteries and local educational institutions and Confucianism remained the ideology of social cohesion and state power.[1]
[180] In the times of the Sui, Tang, and Song dynasties (581–1279), China remained the world's largest economy and most technologically advanced society.[181][182] Inventions such as gunpowder, woodblock printing, and the magnetic compass were improved upon. China stood in contrast to other areas at the time as the imperial governments exhibited concentrated central authority instead of feudalism.[183]

China exhibited much interest in foreign affairs during the Tang and Song dynasties. From the 7th through the 10th centuries, Tang China was focused on securing the Silk Road as the selling of its goods westwards was central to the nation's economy.[179][184] For a time China successfully secured its frontiers by integrating their nomadic neighbors - the Göktürks - into their civilization.[185] The Tang dynasty expanded into Central Asia and received tribute from countries as distant as Eastern Iran.[179] Western expansion ended with wars with the Abbasid Caliphate and the deadly An Lushan Rebellion which resulted in a deadly but uncertain death toll of millions.[186] After the collapse of the Tang dynasty and subsequent civil wars came the second phase of Chinese interest in foreign relations. Unlike the Tang, the Song specialized in overseas trade and peacefully created a maritime network, and China's population became concentrated in the south.[187] Chinese merchant ships reached Indonesia, India, and Arabia. Southeast Asia's economy flourished from trade with Song China.[188]

With the country's emphasis on trade and economic growth. Song China's economy began to use machines to manufacture goods and coal as a source of energy.[189] The advances of the Song in the 11th/12th centuries have been considered an early industrial revolution.[190] Economic advancements came at the cost of military affairs and the Song became open to invasions from the north. China became divided as Song's northern lands were conquered by the Jurchen people.[191] By 1200, there were five Chinese kingdoms stretching from modern day Turkestan to the Sea of Japan including the Western Liao, Western Xia, Jin, Southern Song, and Dali.[192] Because these states competed with each other they all were eventually annexed by the rising Mongol Empire before 1279.[193] After seventy years of conquest, the Mongols proclaimed the Yuan dynasty and also subjugated Korea; they failed to conquer Japan.[194] Mongol conquerors also made China accessible to European travelers such as Marco Polo.[195] The Mongol era was short lived due to plagues and famine.[196] After the revolution in 1368, the succeeding Ming dynasty ushered in a period of prosperity and brief foreign expeditions before isolating itself from global affairs for centuries.[197]
Korea and Japan however continued to have relations with China and with other Asian countries. In the 15th century Sejong the Great of Korea cemented his country's identity by creating the Hangul writing system to replace use of Chinese characters.[198] Meanwhile, Japan fell under military rule of the Kamakura and later Ashikaga Shogunate dominated by the samurai.[199]
Oceania
[edit]-
Map of the Aboriginal regions in Australia.

Separate from developments in Afro-Eurasia and the Americas the region of greater Oceania continued to develop independently of the outside world. In Australia, the society of Aboriginal Australians changed little through the post-classical Period since their arrival in the area from Africa around 50,000 BCE. The only evidence of outside contact were encounters with fishermen of Indonesian origin.[G][200]
Polynesian and Micronesian peoples are rooted from Taiwan and Southeast Asia and began their migration into the Pacific Ocean from 3000 to 1500 BCE.[201] After the 4th century, the Micronesians and Polynesians began to explore the South Pacific and later constructed cities in previously uninhabited areas including Nan Madol Muʻa and others.[H][202] Around 1200 CE the Tuʻi Tonga Empire spread its influence far and wide throughout the South Pacific Islands, being described by academics as a maritime chiefdom which used trade networks to keep power centralized around the king's capital.[203] Polynesians on outrigger canoes discovered and colonized some of the last uninhabited islands of earth.[201] Hawaii, New Zealand, and Easter Island were among the final places to be reached, settlers discovering pristine lands. Oral tradition claimed that navigator Ui-te-Rangiora discovered icebergs in the Southern Ocean.[204] In exploring and settling, Polynesian settlers did not strike at random but used their knowledge of wind and water currents to reach their destinations.[205]

On the settled islands some Polynesian groups became distinct from one another, a significant example being the Maori of New Zealand. Other island systems kept in contact with each other, including Hawaii and the Tahiti, goods in long-distance trade included basalt, and Pearl shell.[203] Ecologically, Polynesians had the challenge of sustaining themselves within limited environments. Some settlements caused mass extinctions of some native plant and animal species over time by hunting species such as the moa and introducing the Polynesian rat.[201] Easter Island settlers engaged in complete ecological destruction of their habitat and their population crashed afterwards possibly due to the construction of the Easter Island Statues.[206][207][208][209][I] Other colonizing groups adapted to accommodate to the ecology of specific islands such as the Moriori of the Chatham Islands.
Europeans on their voyages visited many Pacific islands in the 16th and 17th century, but most areas of Oceania were not colonized until after the voyages of British explorer James Cook in the 1780s.[211]
Americas
[edit]The post-classical era of the Americas can be considered set at a different time span from that of Afro-Eurasia. As the developments of Mesoamerican and Andean civilization differ greatly from that of the Old World, as well as the speed at which it developed, the post-classical era in the traditional sense does not take place until near the end of the medieval age in Western Europe.[J]
As such, for the purposes of this article, the Woodland period and Classic stage of the Americas will be discussed here, which takes place from about 400 to 1400.[214] For the technical post-classical stage in American development which took place on the eve of European contact, see Post-Classic stage.
North America
[edit]As a continent there was little unified trade or communication. Advances in agriculture spread northward from Mesoamerica indirectly through trade. Major cultural areas however still developed independently of each other.
Norse contact and the polar regions
[edit]
While there was little regular contact between the Americas and the Old World, the Norse explored and even colonized Greenland and Canada as early as 1000. None of these settlements survived past medieval times. Outside of Scandinavia knowledge of the discovery of the Americas was interpreted as a remote island or the North Pole.[215]
The Norse arriving from Iceland settled Greenland from approximately 980 to 1450.[216] The Norse arrived in southern Greenland prior to the 13th century approach of Inuit Thule people in the area. The extent of the interaction between the Norse and Thule is unclear.[216] Greenland was valuable to the Norse due to trade of ivory that came from the tusks of walruses. The Little Ice Age adversely affected the colonies and they vanished.[216] Greenland would be lost to Europeans until Danish Colonization in the 18th century.[217]
The Norse also explored and colonized farther south in Newfoundland, Canada at L'Anse aux Meadows referred to by the Norse as Vinland. The colony at most existed for twenty years and resulted in no known transmission of diseases or technology to the First Nations. To the Norse Vinland was known for plentiful grape vines to make superior wine. One reason for the colony's failure was constant violence with the native Beothuk people who the Norse referred to as skrælings.
After initial expeditions there is a possibility that the Norse continued to visit modern day Canada. Surviving records from medieval Iceland indicate some sporadic voyages to a land called Markland, possibly the coast of Labrador, Canada, as late as 1347 presumably to collect wood for deforested Greenland.[218]
Northern areas
[edit]
In North America, many hunter-gatherer and agricultural societies thrived in the diverse region. Native American tribes varied greatly in characteristics; some, including the Mound Builders and the Oasisamerican cultures were complex chiefdoms.[219] Other nations which inhabited the states of the modern northern United States and Canada had less complexity and did not follow technological changes as quickly. Approximately around the year 500 during the Woodland period, Native Americans began to transition to bows and arrows from spears for hunting and warfare.[220] Around the year 1,000 corn was widely adopted as a staple crop in the Eastern United States. Corn would continue to be the staple crop of natives in the Eastern United States and Canada until the Columbian exchange.[221][222]
In the Eastern United States, rivers were the medium of trade and communication. Cahokia located in the modern US state of Illinois was among the most significant city within the Mississippian culture.[219] Focused around Monks Mound archaeology indicates the population increased exponentially after 1000 because it manufactured important tools for agriculture and hosted cultural attractions.[223] Around 1350, Cahokia was abandoned with environmental factors having been proposed for the city's decline.[224]
At the same time, Ancestral Puebloans constructed clusters of buildings in the Chaco Canyon site located in the State of New Mexico. Individual houses may have been occupied by more than 600 residents at any one time. Chaco Canyon was the only pre-Columbian site in the United States to build paved roads.[225] Pottery indicates a society that was becoming more complex, turkeys for the first time in the continental United States were also domesticated. Around 1150 the structures of Chaco Canyon were abandoned, likely as a result of severe drought.[226][227][228] There were also other Pueblo complexes in the Southwestern United States like the Cliff Palace located in Mesa Verde National Park. After reaching climaxes native complex societies in the United States declined and did not entirely recover before the arrival of European explorers.[227][K]
Caribbean
[edit]
Concentrating a significant number of islands, the Caribbean had been the scene of constant maritime migrations via canoes since the Lithic stage, with its first inhabitants reaching the area by around 5000 BCE.[230]
After a millennium of population flows, the various peoples of the Caribbean entered in the post-classical period with notable developments on numerous permanent settlements and more complex social organizations, which were a result of the improvement of agricultural techniques and also the considerable growth of villages, that became great ceremonial and commercial centers led by different Cacique. Trading goods like shells, cotton, gold, colored stones and rare feathers were largely exported from island to island, ranging from the Lesser to the Great Antilles.[231]
By around 650 C.E and 800 C.E, new migratory waves from the Caribbean coast of present-day Venezuela took place and several people began a process of major cultural, sociopolitical, and ritual reformulations, which led to the formation of the first chiefdoms and the emergence of social hierarchy.[232] This period can also be described by the expulsion of the ancient Saladoid peoples from the main islands of the Caribbean and their subsequent replacement by the newly arrived Taíno people, who fiercely competed with other Arawak-speaking groups for arable land and war captives. Despite little evidence, some scholars still claim that the Taíno may have had a tenuous influence from the Maya civilization, as certain customs, such as the practice of batey, may have been inherited from the original Mesoamerican ballgame which also carried a religious character.[233]
When Christopher Columbus landed in the Bahamas in 1492, he and his crew initially maintained a peaceful contact with the local Taíno people, but soon afterwards they were enslaved by the Spanish colonizers, bringing the area into the early modern period.
Mesoamerica
[edit]
At the beginning of the global post-classical period, the city of Teotihuacan was at its zenith, housing over 125,000 people, at 500 AD it was the sixth largest city in the world at the time.[234] The city's residents built the Pyramid of the Sun the third largest pyramid of the world, oriented to follow astronomical events. In the 6th and 7th centuries, the city suddenly declined possibly as a result of severe environmental damage caused by extreme weather events of 535–536. There is evidence that large parts of the city were burned, possibly in a domestic rebellion.[235][L] The city's legacy would inspire all future civilizations in the region.[238]
At the same time was Classic Age of the Maya civilization clustered in dozens of city states on the Yucatán and modern day Guatemala.[239] The most significant of these cities was Chichen Itza which often fiercely competed with anywhere from 60 to 80 city states to be the dominant economic influence in the region.[240] Likewise, other Mayan cities such as Tikal and Calakmul also initiated a series of full-scale conflicts in the area over power and prestige, culminating in the Tikal-Calakmul Wars in the 6th century.[241]
The Mayans had an upper caste of priests, who were well versed in astronomy, mathematics, and writing. The Mayan developed the concept of zero, and a 365-day calendar which possibly pre-dates its creation in Old World societies.[242] After 900, many Mayan cities suddenly declined due to ecological disaster which was likely caused by a combination of drought and an incessant cycle of warfare, It's also been noted that classical Mayan Cities lacked food storage facilities.[213]

The Toltec Empire arose from the Toltec culture, and were remembered as wise and benevolent leaders. One priest-king called Ce Acatl Topiltzin advocated against human sacrifice.[243] After his death in 947, civil wars of religious character broke out between those who supported and opposed Topiltzin's teachings.[243] Modern historians however are skeptical of the extent of Toltec and influence and believe that much of the information known about the Toltecs was created by the later Aztecs as an inspiration myth.[244]
In the 1300s, a small band of violent, religious radicals called the Aztecs began minor raids throughout the area.[245] Eventually they began to claim connections with the Toltec civilization, and insisted they were the rightful successors.[246] They began to grow in numbers and conquer large areas of land. Fundamental to their conquest, was the use of political terror in the sense that the Aztec leaders and priests would command the human sacrifice of their subjugated people as means of humility and coercion.[245] Most of the Mesoamerican region would eventually fall under the Aztec Empire.[245] On the Yucatán Peninsula most of the Maya peoples continued to be independent of the Aztecs but their traditional civilization declined.[247] Aztec developments expanded cultivation, applying the use of chinampas, irrigation, and terrace agriculture; important crops included maize, sweet potatoes, and avocados.[245]
In 1430, the city of Tenochtitlan allied with other powerful Nahuatl-speaking cities, Texcoco and Tlacopan, to create the Aztec Empire, otherwise known as the Triple Alliance.[247] Though referred to as an empire the Aztec Empire functioned as a system of tribute collection with Tenochtitlan at its center. By the turn of the 16th century, "flower wars" between the Aztecs and rival states such as Tlaxcala had continued for over fifty years.[248]
South America
[edit]South American civilization was concentrated in the Andean region which had already hosted complex cultures since 2,500 BCE. East of the Andean region, societies were generally semi nomadic. Discoveries on the Amazon River Basin indicate the region likely had a pre-contact population of five million people and hosted complex societies.[249] Around the continent numerous agricultural peoples from Colombia to Argentina steadily advanced through numerous stages of development from 500 CE until European contact.[250]
Andes
[edit]
During ancient times, the Andes had developed civilizations independent of outside influences including that of Mesoamerica.[251] Through the Post Classical era a cycle of civilizations continued until Spanish contact. Collectively Andean societies lacked currency, a written language and solid draft animals enjoyed by old world civilizations. Instead Andeans developed other methods to foster their growth, including use of the quipu system to communicate messages, llamas to carry smaller loads and an economy based on reciprocity.[245] Societies were often based on strict social hierarchies and economic redistribution from the ruling class.[245]
In the first half of the post-classical period, the Andes was dominated by two almost equally powerful states. In the north of Peru was the Wari Empire and in the south of Peru and Bolivia there was the Tiwanaku Empire, both of whom were inspired by the earlier Moche people.[252] While the extent of their relationship to each other is unknown, it is believed that they competed with one another, but avoided direct conflict. Without war, there was prosperity and around the year 700 Tiwanaku city hosted a population of 1.4 million.[253] After the 8th century both states declined due to changing environmental conditions, laying the ground work for the Incas and other minor kingdoms to emerge as distinct cultures centuries later.[254]
In the 15th century, the Inca Empire rose to annex all other nations in the area. Led by their sun-god king, Sapa Inca, they slowly conquered what is now Peru, and built their society throughout the Andes cultural region. The Incas spoke the Quechua languages. Taking advantage of ancient advances left by previous Andean societies, the Incas were able to create the most advanced system of trade routes of South America, known as the Inca road system, which allowed greater interconnection between the conquered provinces.[255] Incas have been known to have used abacuses to calculate mathematics. The Inca Empire is known for some of its magnificent structures, such as Machu Picchu in the Cusco region.[256] The empire expanded quickly northwards to Ecuador, southwards to central Chile. To the north of the Inca Empire remained the independent Tairona and Muisca Confederation who practiced agriculture and gold metallurgy.[257][258]
End of the period
[edit]
As the post-classical era drew to a close in the 15th century, many of the empires established throughout the period were in decline.[259] The Byzantine Empire would soon be overshadowed in the Mediterranean by both Islamic and Christian rivals including Venice, Genoa, and the Ottoman Empire.[260] The Byzantines faced repeated attacks from eastern and western powers during the Fourth Crusade, and declined further until the loss of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453.[259]
The largest change came in terms of trade and technology. The global significance of the fall of the Byzantines was the disruption of overland routes between Asia and Europe.[261] Traditional dominance of nomadism in Eurasia declined and the Pax Mongolica which had allowed for interactions between different civilizations was no longer available. West Asia and South Asia were conquered by gunpowder empires which successfully used advances in military technology but closed the Silk Road.[M][262]

Europeans – specifically the Portuguese and various Italian explorers – intended to replace land travel with sea travel.[263] Originally European exploration merely looked for new routes to reach known destinations.[263] Portuguese explorer Vasco da Gama traveled to India by sea in 1498 by circumnavigating Africa around the Cape of Good Hope.[264] India and the coast of Africa were already known to Europeans but none had attempted a large trading mission prior to that time.[264] Due to navigation advances Portugal would create a global colonial empire beginning with the conquest of Malacca in modern-day Malaysia from 1511.[265]
Other explorers such as the Spanish-sponsored Italian Christopher Columbus intended to engage in trade by traveling on unfamiliar routes west from Europe. The subsequent European discovery of the Americas in 1492 resulted in the Columbian exchange and the world's first pan-oceanic globalization.[266] Spanish explorer Ferdinand Magellan performed the first known circumnavigation of Earth in 1521.[267] The transfer of goods and diseases across oceans was unprecedented in creating a more connected world.[268] From developments in navigation and trade, modern history began.[266]
Explanatory notes
[edit]- ^ Post-Classical is often used to describe global history that took place during the time of the European Middle Ages (whose scope is entirely Euro-centric). The use of Post-Classical as a term for the period is sometimes disputed but is still used in academic circles.[4] This usage of Post-Classical 'World History' should not be confused with the Post-Classic period of Mesoamerica.
- ^ To expand further- Oceania, Afro Eurasia and the Americas were separated by hard oceanic barriers that prevented global interactions between them until the late 15th century. The existence of these three 'worlds' does not imply that all parts of each world-region were connected to themselves. In Afro-Eurasia for instance, South and Central Africa were certainly disconnected from the greater continental networks as were remote areas of Siberia.[28]
- ^ Historians befeore the 1980s often believed the Plague of Justinian that struck in 541 had an Asian origin. While it is possible that the disease itself was from modern-day Tajikistan it now seems that the opposite was true: the plague spread from West to East instead. There is little mention of 6th century epidemics in Asia before the plague had reached Byzantine Empire . The outbreak of 541 may have originated in Axum (Ethiopia) or elsewhere in East Africa. The plague apparently spread eastward from Byzantine Egypt. Persian armies invading Armenia were infected in 543. There was an outbreak of an unknown disease in the capital of southern China in 549. Central Asia was said to have been hit with "famine and disease" in 585. Outbreaks of disease in Central and East Asia continued and recurred for the next two centuries. After prolonged exposure to China, the first recorded epidemics in Korea and Japan were recorded in 698; it is probable but not certain that at least some of the epidemics east of Iran were bubonic.[95]
- ^ Islamization took place across different regions of Eurasia. However the Islamization that took place in maratime Southeast Asia contrast with that of Central Asia. In South East Asia the approach of Islam was a bottom-up process where certain individuals and groups began to convert due to perceived advantages. Meanwhile Central Asia's conversion was a top-down process.[171]
- ^ Within this model the greatest similarities that China had to Western Asia and Europe took place between 200–1000 CE. Similarities included both a breakdown in central authority (during the Three Kingdoms and Europe's Early Middle Ages) as well as the creation of large decentralized multi-ethnic empires (Tang Dynasty and Umayyad Caliphate).[60]
- ^ This corresponds with the end of the Gempi War and the establishment of the 'Shogun' title. The imperial dynasty and their civilian administration in Kyoto continued to exist but held little actual power. Japan would be under military control until 1868.[175]
- ^ Makassar people approached Australia on seasonal missions in search of Sea Cucumber, first arriving between 1500–1720, after the Post-Classical Period.
- ^ The growth of Polynesian settlement has been proposed as a possible start date for the entire era in world history[202]
- ^ The decline of Norse Greenland has been compared to that of Easter Island as both were isolated island societies that practiced deforestation.[210]
- ^ Furthermore how these terms are used depend on the location within the Americas being discussed. For example, the Late-Classic period in Measoamerica is categorized for the years 600-900, while Post Classical began after 900. For the continental United States, Post-Classical History began after 1200.[212][213]
- ^ Typically in North American archaeology the post classical era starts at 1200, differing from the world-history usage of the term and the Measoamerican context as well[229]
- ^ This weather event was worldwide as has been demonstrated by dendroclimatology, it was also documented by Byzantine historians.[236][237]
- ^ The use of 'closed' can be problematic because oftentimes Islamic regimes did not totally forbid Christian travel but would instead levy high tariffs. While some Europeans, including Venice, still took part in Eastern Mediterranean trade most Europeans were unwilling to pay tariffs in the long term.[262]
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ a b c d Kedar & Wiesner-Hanks 2015.
- ^ The Post‐Classical Era Archived 31 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine by Joel Hermansen
- ^ a b c d e f g h Stearns, Peter N. (2017). "Periodization in World History: Challenges and Opportunities". In R. Charles Weller (ed.). 21st-Century Narratives of World History: Global and Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Palgrave. ISBN 978-3-319-62077-0.
- ^ Bentley, Jerry H. (1996). "Cross-Cultural Interaction and Periodization in World History". The American Historical Review. 101 (3): 749–770. doi:10.1086/ahr/101.3.749. ISSN 1937-5239.
- ^ Thompson et al. 2009, p. 82.
- ^ Times Books 1998, p. 128.
- ^ Klein Goldewijk, Kees; Beusen, Arthur; Janssen, Peter (22 March 2010). "Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1". The Holocene. 20 (4): 565–573. Bibcode:2010Holoc..20..565K. doi:10.1177/0959683609356587. ISSN 0959-6836. S2CID 128905931.
- ^ Haub 1995, pp. 5–6: "The average annual rate of growth was actually lower from 1 A.D. to 1650 than the rate suggested above for the 8000 B.C. to 1 A.D. period. One reason for this abnormally slow growth was the Black Plague. This dreaded scourge was not limited to 14th century Europe. The epidemic may have begun about 542 A.D. in Western Asia, spreading from there. It is believed that half the Byzantine Empire was destroyed in the 6th century, a total of 100 million deaths.".
- ^ a b c Holmes & Standen 2018, p. 16.
- ^ Late antiquity: a guide to the postclassical world. 1 April 2000.
- ^ Rapp, Claudia; Drake, H.A., eds. (2014). "The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World". Cambridge University Press. pp. xv–xvi. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139507042.016 (inactive 12 July 2025). ISBN 978-1-139-50704-2.
{{citation}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link) - ^ Evermon, Vandy. "Stafford Library: World History to 1500 – HIST 111 Resource Guide: Part 3 – 500 to 1500". library.ccis.edu. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
- ^ "Pre-AP World History and Geography – Pre-AP | College Board". pre-ap.collegeboard.org. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
- ^ Bentley, the Late Jerry H. (2012). Bentley, Jerry H (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of World History. Vol. 1. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235810.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-923581-0.
- ^ a b c d Borgolte in Loud & Staub 2017, pp. 70–84
- ^ a b Holmes, Catherine (6 May 2021). "Global Middle Ages". The Later Middle Ages. Oxford University Press. pp. 195–219. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198731641.003.0008. ISBN 978-0-19-873164-1.
- ^ Loud & Staub 2017, pp. 1–13.
- ^ Geary in Loud & Staub 2017, pp. 57–69
- ^ Nelson in Loud & Staub 2017, pp. 17–36
- ^ Silverstein 2010, pp. 94–107.
- ^ Belich, Darwin & Wickham in Belich et al. 2016, pp. 3–22
- ^ William S. Atwell, 'Volcanism and Short-Term Climatic Change in East Asian and World History, c. 1200–1699 Archived 28 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine', Journal of World History, 12.1 (Spring 2001), 29–98.
- ^ Richard W. Bulliet, Cotton, Climate, and Camels in Early Islamic Iran: A Moment in World History (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), ISBN 978-0-231-51987-8.
- ^ Ronnie Ellenblum, The Collapse of the Eastern Mediterranean: Climate Change and the Decline of the East, 950–1072 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
- ^ John L. Brooke, Climate Change and the Course of Global History: A Rough Journey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), ISBN 978-1-139-05081-4, doi:10.1017/CBO9781139050814.
- ^ Victor Lieberman, 'Charter State Collapse in Southeast Asia, c.1250–1400, as a Problem in Regional and World History', American Historical Review, cxvi (2011), 937–63.
- ^ Bruce M. S. Campbell, The Great Transition: Climate, Disease and Society in the Late-Medieval World (Cambridge, 2016).
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 7.
- ^ Birken 1992, pp. 451–461.
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 395.
- ^ Hermans 2020, pp. 95–107.
- ^ a b Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, trans. by Yuval Noah Harari, John Purcell and Haim Watzman (London: Harvill Secker, 2014), ISBN 978-1-84655-823-8, 978-1-84655-824-5, chapter 12.
- ^ a b Bowman 2000, pp. 162–167.
- ^ a b Thompson et al. 2009, p. 288.
- ^ Fletcher, Richard (1997). The Conversion of Europe: From Paganism to Christianity, 371–1386 AD. London: HarperCollins.
- ^ Silverstein 2010, pp. 9–35.
- ^ "Environment and Trade: The Viking Age". Khan Academy. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018.
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 8.
- ^ Ioannidis, Alexander G.; Blanco-Portillo, Javier; Sandoval, Karla; Hagelberg, Erika; Barberena-Jonas, Carmina; Hill, Adrian V. S.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Juan Esteban; Fox, Keolu; Robson, Kathryn; Haoa-Cardinali, Sonia; Quinto-Cortés, Consuelo D.; Miquel-Poblete, Juan Francisco; Auckland, Kathryn; Parks, Tom; Sofro, Abdul Salam M. (22 September 2021). "Paths and timings of the peopling of Polynesia inferred from genomic networks". Nature. 597 (7877): 522–526. Bibcode:2021Natur.597..522I. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03902-8. ISSN 0028-0836. PMC 9710236. PMID 34552258. S2CID 237608692.
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 106.
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 100.
- ^ Ahmed, Moinuddin; Anchukaitis, Kevin J.; Asrat, Asfawossen; Borgaonkar, Hemant P.; Braida, Martina; Buckley, Brendan M.; Büntgen, Ulf; Chase, Brian M.; Christie, Duncan A.; Cook, Edward R.; Curran, Mark A.J.; Diaz, Henry F.; Esper, Jan; Fan, Ze-Xin; Gaire, Narayan P.; Ge, Quansheng; Gergis, Joëlle; González-Rouco, J. Fidel; Goosse, Hugues; Grab, Stefan W.; Graham, Nicholas; Graham, Rochelle; Grosjean, Martin; Hanhijärvi, Sami T.; Kaufman, Darrell S.; Kiefer, Thorsten; Kimura, Katsuhiko; Korhola, Atte A.; Krusic, Paul J.; et al. (21 April 2013). "Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia" (PDF). Nature Geoscience. 6 (5): 339. Bibcode:2013NatGe...6..339P. doi:10.1038/NGEO1797. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2019. Retrieved 29 June 2018.
- ^ Klimek, Kimberly; Troyer, Pamela L.; Davis-Secord, Sarah; KeEne, Bryan C. (19 May 2021). Global Medieval Contexts 500–1500. p. 172. doi:10.4324/9781315102771. ISBN 978-1-315-10277-1.
- ^ "Old trees reveal Late Antique Little Ice Age (LALIA) around 1,500 years ago". ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 28 June 2018. Retrieved 28 June 2018.
- ^ "Drought Congruence 1000–1300, Central United States". North American Drought Atlas. 2010. Archived from the original on 31 October 2021. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
- ^ "Timeline Middle Ages and Early Modern Period – Environmental History Resources". Environmental History Resources. Archived from the original on 28 June 2018. Retrieved 28 June 2018.
- ^ Hendy, E.; Gagan, M.; Alibert, C.; McCulloch, M.; Lough, J.; Isdale, P. (2002). "Abrupt decrease in tropical Pacific sea surface salinity at end of Little Ice Age". Science. 295 (5559): 1511–1514. Bibcode:2002Sci...295.1511H. doi:10.1126/science.1067693. PMID 11859191. S2CID 25698190.
- ^ "Carnegie Department of Global Ecology". dge.carnegiescience.edu. Archived from the original on 11 March 2017. Retrieved 3 August 2018.
- ^ Times Books 1998, pp. 17–19.
- ^ "TIMELINE: World History". www.wdl.org. Archived from the original on 22 January 2019. Retrieved 12 June 2019.
- ^ a b Holmes & Standen 2018, pp. 1–44.
- ^ "Review of: Empires and Exchanges in Eurasian Late Antiquity: Rome, China, Iran, and the Steppe, ca. 250-750". Bryn Mawr Classical Review. ISSN 1055-7660. Archived from the original on 13 October 2022. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
- ^ a b Moore, Robert I. (1 February 2016). "A Global Middle Ages?". The Prospect of Global History. Oxford University Press. pp. 80–92. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732259.003.0005. ISBN 978-0-19-873225-9.
- ^ a b Berger et al. 2016, p. 101.
- ^ "Asian Topics on Asia for Educators Medieval Japan". afe.easia.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 14 June 2021. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 443.
- ^ a b c Berger et al. 2016, p. 433.
- ^ a b Berger et al. 2016, p. 107.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 127.
- ^ a b "Did the Middle Kingdom Have a Middle Period?: The Problem of "Medieval" in China's History". Association for Asian Studies. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
- ^ Hall, John Whitney (1962). "Feudalism in Japan-A Reassessment". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 5 (1): 15–51. doi:10.1017/S001041750000150X. JSTOR 177767. S2CID 145750386.
- ^ Friday, Karl (2010). "The Futile Paradigm: In Quest of Feudalism in Early Medieval Japan". History Compass. 8 (2): 179–196. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00664.x. ISSN 1478-0542.
- ^ "The Problem of Feudalism: An Historiographical Essay". 29 February 2008. Archived from the original on 29 February 2008. Retrieved 3 October 2022.
- ^ Morgan. The Mongols. p. 5.
- ^ Chronicle of World History 2008, p. 234.
- ^ Diamond. Guns, Germs, and Steel. p. 367.
- ^ The Mongols and Russia, by George Vernadsky
- ^ The Mongol World Empire, 1206–1370, by John Andrew Boyle
- ^ The History of China, by David Curtis Wright. p. 84.
- ^ The Early Civilization of China, by Yong Yap Cotterell, Arthur Cotterell. p. 223.
- ^ Mongols and Mamluks: The Mamluk-Ilkhanid War, 1260–1281 by Reuven Amitai-Preiss
- ^ Guzman, Gregory G. (1988). "Were the barbarians a negative or positive factor in ancient and medieval history?". The Historian. 50 (4): 568–570. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.1988.tb00759.x. JSTOR 24447158.
- ^ Allsen 2001, p. 211.
- ^ Biran, Michael (1997). Qaidu and the Rise of the Independent Mongol State in Central Asia. The Curzon Press. ISBN 978-0-7007-0631-0.
- ^ a b The Harper atlas of world history. New York : Harper & Row. 1987. pp. 112–113.
- ^ Allsen 1994, p. 413.
- ^ Jackson. Mongols and the West. p. 127.
- ^ Allsen 2001, pp. xiii, 235.
- ^ a b c Chronicle of World History 2008, p. 233.
- ^ a b Christian 2000, pp. 1–21.
- ^ Bowman 2000, p. 101.
- ^ a b Bowman 2000, p. 568.
- ^ Whitfield, Susan; Sims-Williams, Ursula (2004). The Silk Road: Trade, Travel, War and Faith. Chicago, IL: Serindia Publications, Inc. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-932476-12-5.
- ^ a b c Barraclough 2003, p. 146.
- ^ a b Stearns et al. 2011, p. 321.
- ^ Johnson, David; Turner, Victor; Turner, Edith (1980). "Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture". Sociological Analysis. 41 (1): 85. doi:10.2307/3709864. ISSN 0038-0210. JSTOR 3709864.
- ^ Klimek, Kimberly; Troyer, Pamela L.; Davis-Secord, Sarah; KeEne, Bryan C. (19 May 2021). Global Medieval Contexts 500–1500. pp. 209–211. doi:10.4324/9781315102771. ISBN 978-1-315-10277-1.
- ^ "Justinian's Plague (541–542 CE)". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2018.
- ^ Thompson et al. 2009, p. 310.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. [page needed].
- ^ a b c d e f Sussman, George D. (2011). "Was the Black Death in India and China?". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 85 (3): 319–355. doi:10.1353/bhm.2011.0054. ISSN 1086-3176. PMID 22080795. S2CID 41772477.
- ^ Kedar & Wiesner-Hanks 2015, p. 66.
- ^ Eroshenko, Galina A.; Nosov, Nikita Yu; Krasnov, Yaroslav M.; Oglodin, Yevgeny G.; Kukleva, Lyubov M.; Guseva, Natalia P.; Kuznetsov, Alexander A.; Abdikarimov, Sabyrzhan T.; Dzhaparova, Aigul K.; Kutyrev, Vladimir V. (26 October 2017). "Yersinia pestis strains of ancient phylogenetic branch 0.ANT are widely spread in the high-mountain plague foci of Kyrgyzstan". PLOS ONE. 12 (10) e0187230. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1287230E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187230. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5658180. PMID 29073248.
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 522.
- ^ a b Hermans 2020, pp. 523–529.
- ^ a b Hermans 2020, pp. 525–527.
- ^ Hermans 2020, pp. 523–525.
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 531.
- ^ Belich in Belich et al. 2016, pp. 95–96
- ^ Slavin, Philip (2019). "Death by the Lake: Mortality Crisis in Early Fourteenth-Century Central Asia". The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. 50 (1): 59–90. doi:10.1162/jinh_a_01376. hdl:1893/29711. ISSN 0022-1953. S2CID 162183994.
- ^ Belich in Belich et al. 2016, pp. 93–94
- ^ The Black Death in Egypt and England. University of Texas Press. 2005. doi:10.7560/706170. ISBN 978-0-292-79691-1.
- ^ a b Kedar & Wiesner-Hanks 2015, p. 67.
- ^ Belich in Belich et al. 2016, pp. 104–105
- ^ Belich in Belich et al. 2016, pp. 106–107
- ^ Hatch, Dr Robert A. "Outline – Post-Classical Science – History of Science Study Guide – Dr Robert A. Hatch". users.clas.ufl.edu. Archived from the original on 30 June 2016. Retrieved 1 July 2018.
- ^ A History of Medicine: Byzantine and Islamic medicine By Plinio Prioreschi Vol. iv, p. 121, ISBN 1-888456-02-7
- ^ Bertrand Russell (1945) History of Western Philosophy, book 2, part 2, chapter X
- ^ Abdus Salam, H.R. Dalafi, Mohamed Hassan (1994). Renaissance of Sciences in Islamic Countries p. 162. World Scientific, ISBN 9971-5-0713-7.
- ^ a b Berger et al. 2016, p. 451.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 108.
- ^ Meggs, Philip B. A History of Graphic Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1998. (p. 58) ISBN 0-471-29198-6
- ^ Masood 2009, pp. 132–135.
- ^ "History of paper". users.stlcc.edu. Archived from the original on 22 August 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
- ^ Morillo, Stephen (2008). War in World History: Society, Technology, and War from Ancient Times to the Present, Volume 1, To 1500. McGraw-Hill. p. 259. ISBN 978-0-07-052584-9.
- ^ Chase, Kenneth (2003). Firearms: A Global History to 1700. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-521-82274-9.
- ^ "World Literature and Music | Essential Humanities". www.essential-humanities.net. Archived from the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 3 July 2018.
- ^ "Western Music Timeline | Essential Humanities". www.essential-humanities.net. Archived from the original on 23 June 2018. Retrieved 3 July 2018.
- ^ "World Literature and Music | Essential Humanities". 3 July 2018. Archived from the original on 3 July 2018. Retrieved 17 October 2022.
- ^ Stearns et al. 2011, p. 184.
- ^ "Trade and the Spread of Islam in Africa". Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Archived from the original on 17 May 2013. Retrieved 15 June 2013.
- ^ a b Barraclough 2003, p. 136.
- ^ "History of Sub-Saharan Africa | Essential Humanities". www.essential-humanities.net. Archived from the original on 17 June 2018. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
- ^ Cartwright, Mark. "The Spread of Islam in Ancient Africa". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 7 January 2024.
- ^ Chronicle of World History 2008, p. 225.
- ^ Tschanz, David. "Lion of Mali: The Hajj of Mansa Musa". Makzan. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
- ^ Gilian Clark, Late Antiquity: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford 2011), pp. 1–2.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 291.
- ^ a b Berger et al. 2016, p. 429.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 284.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, pp. 282–283.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 282.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 272.
- ^ Fine, John A. (1991). The Early Medieval Balkans. The University of Michigan Press. pp. 37, 113.
- ^ Vidal-Nanquet 1987, p. 96.
- ^ Vidal-Nanquet 1987, p. 108.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 285.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 444.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, pp. 122–123.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 142.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 477.
- ^ Miglio "Curial Humanism" Interpretations of Renaissance Humanism p. 112
- ^ Times Books 1998, p. 78.
- ^ Vidal-Nanquet 1987, p. 70.
- ^ Wells, H.G (1920). The Outline of History. Garden City, NUY: Garden City Publishing Inc. p. 544.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, pp. 301–302.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, pp. 303–305.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 296.
- ^ Vidal-Nanquet 1987, p. 76.
- ^ "GERARD OF CREMONA". www.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 4 October 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
- ^ Vidal-Nanquet 1987, p. 110.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 328.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 331.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 333.
- ^ The Harper atlas of world history. New York : Harper & Row. pp. 106–107.
- ^ Stein, Burton (27 April 2010). Arnold, D. (ed.). A History of India (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 105. ISBN 978-1-4051-9509-6. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 13 September 2020.
- ^ Keay, John (2000). India: A History. Grove Press. pp. xx–xxi.
- ^ Murray, H.J.R. (1913). A History of Chess. Benjamin Press (originally published by Oxford University Press). ISBN 978-0-936317-01-4. OCLC 13472872.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ History of Asia by B.V. Rao p. 211
- ^ "The spread of Hinduism in Southeast Asia and the Pacific". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 16 January 2020. Retrieved 20 December 2016.
- ^ "mughal_index". www.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 15 July 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2019.
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 65.
- ^ Hermans 2020, p. 170.
- ^ Kiernan, Ben (2009). Blood and Soil: A World History of Genocide and Extermination from Sparta to Darfur. Yale University Press. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-300-14425-3. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
- ^ Cœdès, George (1968). The Indianized states of Southeast Asia. Honolulu: East-West Center Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-0368-1. OCLC 961876784.
- ^ a b Chronicle of World History 2008, p. 211.
- ^ Alison Crowther; Leilani Lucas; Richard Helm; Nicole L. Boivin (2016). "Ancient crops provide first archaeological signature of the westward Austronesian expansion". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113 (24): 6635–6640. Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.6635C. doi:10.1073/pnas.1522714113. PMC 4914162. PMID 27247383.
- ^ Bulliet et al. 2014, p. 186.
- ^ Kedar & Wiesner-Hanks 2015, p. 315.
- ^ Kedar & Wiesner-Hanks 2015, p. 242.
- ^ a b Berger et al. 2016, p. [page needed].
- ^ "Chinese Imperial Dynasties". Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
- ^ Clark, Paul. "Chinese History in the Post-Classical Age (500 CE to 1500 CE)" (PDF). Humanities Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 May 2020. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
- ^ "Periodization and Historical Patterns in Chinese History: Approaches to Historical Thinking Skills in AP World History". Association for Asian Studies. Archived from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
- ^ a b "Timelines: JAPAN | Asia for Educators | Columbia University". afe.easia.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 9 August 2015. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
- ^ "Ancient Japan". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 1 August 2018. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
- ^ "Ancient Japanese & Chinese Relations". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 1 August 2018. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
- ^ "Ancient Korean & Chinese Relations". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 11 March 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
- ^ a b c Barraclough 2003, p. 126.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 181.
- ^ Bulliet et al. 2014, p. 264.
- ^ Lockard, Craig (1999). "Tang Civilization and the Chinese Centuries" (PDF). Encarta Historical Essays. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2018.
- ^ Dalby 1979, pp. 561–681.
- ^ Chronicle of World History 2008, p. 615.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 149.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 156.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, pp. 126–127.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 132.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 160.
- ^ Patterson, F.So L.; Schafer, J.F. (1978). "Registration of Clintland 60 and Clintland 64 Oats (Reg. No. 280 and 281)". Crop Science. 18 (2): 354. doi:10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183x001800020049x. ISSN 0011-183X.
- ^ Chronicle of World History 2008, p. 202.
- ^ 國家地震局地球物理硏究所 (China) (1990). 中國歷史地震圖集 : 清時期. Zhongguo di tu chu ban she. ISBN 7-5031-0574-7. OCLC 26030569.
- ^ Chronicle of World History 2008, pp. 232–233.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, pp. 128–129.
- ^ "The Mongols in World History" (PDF). Asian Topics in World History. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2018 – via Columbia University.
- ^ "HISTORY OF CHINA". www.historyworld.net. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 1 July 2018.
- ^ "Zheng He". Khan Academy. Archived from the original on 14 August 2018. Retrieved 14 August 2018.
- ^ Burzillo, David (May 2004). "Writing and World History". World History Connected. 1 (2). Archived from the original on 25 April 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
- ^ Chronicle of World History 2008, p. 226.
- ^ Ian, Lilley (2006). Archaeology of Oceania: Australia and the Pacific Islands. Blackwell. p. 117. ISBN 978-0-631-23082-3. OCLC 474724373.
- ^ a b c "Australia and Oceania: Human Geography". National Geographic Society. 4 January 2012. Archived from the original on 8 September 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
- ^ a b Keene, Bryan C. (3 September 2019). Toward a global Middle Ages: encountering the world through illuminated manuscripts. Getty Publications. ISBN 978-1-60606-598-3. OCLC 1065544375.
- ^ a b "[A Companion to the Global Early Middle Ages ]". A Companion to the Global Early Middle Ages. Arc Humanities Press. pp. 105–106. 29 February 2020. doi:10.2307/j.ctvz0h9cf.5. ISBN 978-1-942401-75-9.
- ^ Smith, Stephenson Percy (1898). Hawaiki: the whence of the Maori: with a sketch of Polynesian history, being an introd. to the native history of Rarotonga. Whitcombe & Tombs. pp. 90–91. Archived from the original on 22 May 2020. Retrieved 19 January 2013.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 9.
- ^ West, Barbara A. (2008) Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania
- ^ Hunt, T. (2006). "Rethinking the Fall of Easter Island". American Scientist. 94 (5): 412. doi:10.1511/2006.61.1002.
- ^ West, Barbara A. (19 May 2010). Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania. Infobase Publishing. p. 684. ISBN 978-1-4381-1913-7. Archived from the original on 12 April 2016. Retrieved 26 June 2018.. ISBN 0-8160-7109-8.
- ^ Holdaway, R.N.; Jacomb, C. (2000). "Rapid Extinction of the Moas (Aves: Dinornithiformes): Model, Test, and Implications". Science. 287 (5461): 2250–2254. Bibcode:2000Sci...287.2250H. doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2250. PMID 10731144.
- ^ Diamond, Jared M. (2005). Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking. ISBN 0-670-03337-5. OCLC 56367771.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 236.
- ^ Kelley, J. Charles (1 October 1958). "Method and Theory in American Archaeology. By Gordon R. Willey and Philip Phillips". American Journal of Archaeology. 62 (4): 456–457. doi:10.2307/502096. ISSN 0002-9114. JSTOR 502096.
- ^ a b "INDEX". A Companion to the Global Early Middle Ages. Arc Humanities Press. pp. 410–411. 29 February 2020. doi:10.2307/j.ctvz0h9cf.26.
- ^ Willey, Gordon R. (1989). "Gordon Willey". In Glyn Edmund Daniel; Christopher Chippindale (eds.). The Pastmasters: Eleven Modern Pioneers of Archaeology: V. Gordon Childe, Stuart Piggott, Charles Phillips, Christopher Hawkes, Seton Lloyd, Robert J. Braidwood, Gordon R. Willey, C.J. Becker, Sigfried J. De Laet, J. Desmond Clark, D.J. Mulvaney. New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-05051-1. OCLC 19750309.
- ^ Bremen, Adam of (30 November 1977). "[Vinland in] Chapter 39". www.canadianmysteries.ca. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013.
- ^ a b c Cunliffe, Barry W.; Gosden, Chris; Joyce, Rosemary A. (2009). The Oxford handbook of archaeology. Oxford University Press. p. 592. ISBN 978-0-19-927101-6. OCLC 277205272.
- ^ "Colonialism in Greenland: An Inuit Perspective". arcticcircle.uconn.edu. Archived from the original on 31 October 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
- ^ Seaver, Kristen A. (1996). The Frozen Echo: Greenland and the Exploration of North America, Ca. A.D. 1000–1500. Stanford University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-8047-3161-4. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2020.
- ^ a b Bauer 2010, Ch. 75 The New Found Land.
- ^ "American Indian Archery Technology | The Office of the State Archaeologist". archaeology.uiowa.edu. Archived from the original on 27 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018.
- ^ "[Map]". A Companion to the Global Early Middle Ages. Arc Humanities Press. p. 394. 29 February 2020. doi:10.2307/j.ctvz0h9cf.5. ISBN 978-1-942401-75-9.
- ^ Emerson, Thomas E.; Hedman, Kristin M.; Simon, Mary L.; Fort, Mathew A.; Witt, Kelsey E. (April 2020). "Isotopic Confirmation of the Timing and Intensity of Maize Consumption in Greater Cahokia". American Antiquity. 85 (2): 241–262. doi:10.1017/aaq.2020.7. ISSN 0002-7316.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 393.
- ^ "As the river rises: Cahokia's emergence and decline linked to Mississippi River flooding". news.wisc.edu. Archived from the original on 31 July 2018. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
- ^ Carballo, David M. "Trade Routes in the Americas Before Columbus". In Parker, Philip (ed.). The Great Trade Routes: A History of Cargos and Commerce Over Land and Sea. London: Conway Publishing. pp. 166–170. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
- ^ Fagan, B. M. (2005). Chaco Canyon: Archaeologists Explore the Lives of an Ancient Society. Oxford University Press. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-0-19-517043-6.
- ^ a b Berger et al. 2016, p. 391.
- ^ "Reconstructed JJA PDSI 1150 AD". North American Drought Atlas. 2010.[permanent dead link]
- ^ "Method and Theory in American Archaeology by Gordon R. Willey, Philip Phillips". 28 June 2012. Archived from the original on 28 June 2012. Retrieved 4 October 2022.
- ^ Napolitano, Matthew F.; DiNapoli, Robert J.; Stone, Jessica H.; Levin, Maureece J.; Jew, Nicholas P.; Lane, Brian G.; O'Connor, John T.; Fitzpatrick, Scott M. (6 December 2019). "Reevaluating human colonization of the Caribbean using chronometric hygiene and Bayesian modeling". Science Advances. 5 (12) eaar7806. Bibcode:2019SciA....5R7806N. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar7806. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 6957329. PMID 31976370.
- ^ "El desarrollo del cacicazgo en las sociedades tardías de Puerto Rico". 27 May 2019. Archived from the original on 27 May 2019. Retrieved 23 April 2023.
- ^ "The indigenous peoples of Trinidad and Tobago: b from the first settlers until today | WorldCat.org". www.worldcat.org. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
- ^ Alegria, Ricardo E. (1951). "The Ball Game Played by the Aborigines of the Antilles". American Antiquity. 16 (4): 348–352. doi:10.2307/276984. ISSN 0002-7316. JSTOR 276984. S2CID 164059254.
- ^ "Populations of Largest Cities in PMNs from 2000BC to 1988AD". Etext Archives. 29 September 2007. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 12 June 2019.
- ^ "Teotihuacan". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 29 June 2018.
- ^ "Old trees reveal Late Antique Little Ice Age (LALIA) around 1,500 years ago". ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 28 June 2018. Retrieved 3 October 2022.
- ^ Procopius (1914). Procopius. Procopius, H. B. Dewing. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-674-99054-8. OCLC 14557381.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ "Teotihuacan". Ancient History Encyclopedia.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 46
- ^ "INDEX". A Companion to the Global Early Middle Ages. Arc Humanities Press. pp. 393–414. 29 February 2020. doi:10.2307/j.ctvz0h9cf.26.
- ^ Wilford, John Noble (19 September 2002). "Maya Carvings Tell of a War of 2 Superpowers". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 23 April 2023. Retrieved 23 April 2023.
- ^ "History of Mesoamerican Civilization". www.historyworld.net. Archived from the original on 22 March 2018. Retrieved 29 June 2018.
- ^ a b Nelson, Henry (2001). "Topiltzin Quetzalcotal. The once and future Lord of the Toltec". Boulder: University Press of Colorado: 258.
- ^ Gillespie, Susan D. (1989). The Aztec kings: the construction of rulership in Mexica history. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. ISBN 0-8165-1095-4. OCLC 19353576.
- ^ a b c d e f Barraclough 2003, p. 148.
- ^ Bentley. "Chapter 20" (PDF). Traditions and Encounters, AP Edition, 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 May 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
- ^ a b Barraclough 2003, p. 149.
- ^ "Conquistadors – Cortés". PBS. Archived from the original on 15 May 2011. Retrieved 31 October 2010.
- ^ Pärssinen, Martti; Schaan, Denise; Ranzi, Alceu (December 2009). "Pre-Columbian geometric earthworks in the upper Purús: a complex society in western Amazonia". Antiquity. 83 (322): 1084–1095. doi:10.1017/s0003598x00099373. S2CID 55741813.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 47.
- ^ Upton, Gary and von Hagen, Adriana (2015), Encyclopedia of the Incas, New York: Rowand & Littlefield, p. 2. Some scholars cite 6 or 7 pristine civilizations.
- ^ "[Map]". A Companion to the Global Early Middle Ages. Arc Humanities Press. pp. 394–395. 29 February 2020. doi:10.2307/j.ctvz0h9cf.5. ISBN 978-1-942401-75-9.
- ^ Kolata, Alan L. Valley of the Spirits: A Journey into the Lost Realm of the Aymara, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 1996
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 387.
- ^ Cartwright, Mark. "The Inca Road System". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 1 May 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
- ^ Berger et al. 2016, p. 389.
- ^ "Muisca Civilization". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 2 September 2018. Retrieved 2 September 2018.
- ^ "Tairona Civilization". World History Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 2 September 2018. Retrieved 2 September 2018.
- ^ a b Barraclough 2003, pp. 138–139.
- ^ Times Books 1998, p. 113.
- ^ Times Books 1998, p. 144.
- ^ a b Zilfi, Madeline C. (1997). "Halil Inalcik and Donald Quataert, editors. An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1994. pp. xxxi, 1026". The American Historical Review. 102 (2): 488–489. doi:10.1086/ahr/102.2.488. ISSN 1937-5239.
- ^ a b DeLamar 1992
- ^ a b Northrup, David (1998). "Vasco da Gama and Africa: An Era of Mutual Discovery, 1497–1800". Journal of World History. 9 (2): 189–211. doi:10.1353/jwh.2005.0107. ISSN 1527-8050. S2CID 144399108.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 158.
- ^ a b Barraclough 2003, p. 155.
- ^ Barraclough 2003.
- ^ Barraclough 2003, p. 159.
Sources
[edit]- Allsen, Thomas T. (1994). "The rise of the Mongolian empire and the Mongolian rule in north China". In Twitchett, Dennis; Franke, Herbert (eds.). The Cambridge History of China, Volume 6: Alien Regimes and Border States, 907–1368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-24331-5.
- Allsen, Thomas T. (2001). Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-80335-9.
- Barraclough, Geoffrey (2003). HarperCollins Atlas of World History. Ann Arbor: Borders Press in association with HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-681-50288-8. OCLC 56350180.
- Bauer, Susan Wise (2010). The History of the Medieval World: From the Conversion of Constantine to the First Crusade. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-05975-5.
- Belich, James; Darwin, John; Frenz, Margret; Wickham, Chris, eds. (2016). The Prospect of Global History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732259.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-104613-1. OCLC 936040339. Archived from the original on 18 October 2022. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
- Berger, Eugene; Israel, George; Miller, Charlotte; Parkinson, Brian; Reeves, Andrew; Williams, Nadejda (2016). World History: Cultures, States and Societies to 1500. Dahlonega: University of North Georgia Press. ISBN 978-1-940771-10-6. OCLC 961216293.
- Birken, Lawrence (1992). "What is Western Civilization?". The History Teacher. 25 (4): 451–461. doi:10.2307/494353. JSTOR 494353. S2CID 141243435. Archived from the original on 1 April 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
- Bowman, John S. (2000). Columbia Chronologies of Asian History and Culture. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-50004-3.
- Bulliet, Richard W.; Crossley, Pamela Kyle; Headrick, Daniel R.; Johnson, Steven Hirsch (2014). The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History, Brief Edition. Vol. I: To 1550: A Global History. Boston: Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-305-14709-6.
- Christian, David (2000). "Silk Roads or Steppe Roads? The Silk Roads in World History". Journal of World History. 11 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1353/jwh.2000.0004. JSTOR 20078816. S2CID 18008906.
- Dalby, Michael T. (1979). "Court politics in late T'ang times". In Twitchett, Dennis (ed.). The Cambridge History of China, Volume 3: Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-21446-9.
- Haub, Carl (1995). "How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth?". Population Today. 23 (2). Archived from the original on 10 October 2016.
- Hermans, Erik, ed. (2020). A Companion to the Global Early Middle Ages. Yorkshire: Arc Humanities Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvz0h9cf. ISBN 978-1-942401-76-6. OCLC 1143847601. S2CID 241796784.
- Holmes, Catherine; Standen, Naomi (November 2018). "Introduction: Towards a Global Middle Ages". Past & Present (13): 1–44. doi:10.1093/pastj/gty030.
- Kedar, Benjamin Z.; Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E., eds. (2015). The Cambridge World History Expanding Webs of Exchange and Conflict, 500 CE–1500 CE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-511-66748-0. OCLC 1058351091.
- Loud, G. A.; Staub, Martial, eds. (2017). The Making of Medieval History. Woodbridge: York Medieval Press. ISBN 978-1-903153-70-3. OCLC 960462307.
- Masood, Ehsan (2009). Science and Islam: A History. London: Icon Books. ISBN 978-1-785-78202-2.
- Silverstein, Adam J. (2010). Islamic History: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-954572-8.
- Stearns, Peter N.; Adas, Michael; Schwartz, Stuart B.; Gilbert, Marc Jason (2011). World Civilizations: The Global Experience (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Longman. ISBN 978-0-13-136020-4.
- Thompson, John M.; O'Toole, Dan; Patrick, Bethanne; Pruneski, Lauren; Thompson, Tiffin (2009). The Medieval World: An Illustrated Atlas. Washington: National Geographic Society. ISBN 978-1-4262-0533-0. Archived from the original on 31 October 2021. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
- Vidal-Nanquet, Pierre (1987). The Harper Atlas of World History. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
- Chronicle of World History. Old Saybrook: Konecky & Konecky. 2008. ISBN 978-1-56852-680-5. OCLC 298782520.
- Times Books (1998). Harper Collins Atlas of World History. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-7230-1025-8. OCLC 41347894.
Further reading
[edit]- Borgolte, Michael (2022). Die Welten des Mittelalters: Globalgeschichte eines Jahrtausends [The Worlds of the Middle Ages: Global History of a Millennium] (in German). Munich: C.H. Beck. ISBN 978-3-406-78446-0.
External links
[edit]- Freemanpedia – a graphical representation of the Post-classical era.
- Silk Road Seattle – a rich selection of primary sources on the Silk Road and interactions between different cultures in Post-classical times.
Post-classical history
View on GrokipediaThis period began with the deposition of the last Western Roman emperor in 476 CE, leading to decentralized feudal systems in Europe amid barbarian migrations and the persistence of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire.[4][5] In parallel, Islamic conquests from the 7th century unified vast territories under caliphates, fostering advances in mathematics, medicine, and philosophy during the Islamic Golden Age.[6] Across Asia, dynasties like China's Tang (618–907 CE) and Song (960–1279 CE) drove innovations in printing, gunpowder, and maritime trade, while the Mongol Empire under Genghis Khan and successors (1206–1368 CE) created the largest contiguous land empire, enhancing Silk Road exchanges. In Africa, empires such as Ghana and Mali thrived on trans-Saharan gold and salt trade, and in the Americas, Mesoamerican and Andean civilizations including the Maya, Toltecs, and Inca developed complex urban centers and agricultural terraces independent of Eurasian developments. Defining characteristics include intensified religious proselytization—Christianity in Europe and Byzantium, Islam across the Middle East and beyond—and recurrent pandemics like the Black Death (1347–1351 CE), which killed up to 60% of Eurasia's population, alongside technological shifts enabling ocean voyages by 1500 CE.[7] Controversies persist over Eurocentric "Dark Ages" narratives, which overlook empirical evidence of continuity in Byzantine scholarship, Chinese economic output surpassing Europe's, and overall global population recovery and urbanization by the 13th century, challenging views of uniform stagnation.[8]
Historiography
Terminology and periodization
The term "post-classical history" denotes the era following the collapse of major classical civilizations in Eurasia, such as the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE and the Gupta Empire around 550 CE, extending roughly from 500 CE to 1500 CE to encompass global developments in politics, culture, and economics after antiquity. This terminology emerged in world history frameworks to facilitate non-Eurocentric analysis, emphasizing expanding cross-cultural interactions rather than a mere interlude between ancient and modern eras.[9] In contrast, the Eurocentric label "Middle Ages"—coined by Italian scholar Petrarch in the 14th century to describe a perceived cultural decline between classical antiquity and his contemporary Renaissance—dominates traditional historiography for Europe, spanning c. 500–1500 CE.[10] European periodization typically divides this into the Early Middle Ages (c. 500–1000 CE), defined by political fragmentation, migrations, and the consolidation of successor kingdoms; the High Middle Ages (c. 1000–1300 CE), featuring demographic expansion, feudal hierarchies, and institutional growth like the Catholic Church's influence; and the Late Middle Ages (c. 1300–1500 CE), marked by demographic catastrophes, such as the Black Death killing 30–60% of Europe's population between 1347 and 1351, alongside proto-modern shifts.[11] [10] Global applications of post-classical periodization encounter inconsistencies, as regional timelines diverge: for instance, China's Tang dynasty (618–907 CE) represented a classical peak overlapping Europe's early phase, while Mesoamerican civilizations like the Maya persisted without analogous "classical" endpoints until Spanish contact in 1492 CE.[9] Initiatives like the "Global Middle Ages" seek to reframe the era through interconnected networks of trade and migration from 500–1500 CE, yet critics argue this retains implicit Eurocentrism by privileging a period defined by Rome's fall over non-Western chronologies, potentially masking unique causal dynamics in Asia, Africa, and the Americas.[12] [13] Such debates underscore periodization's role as a heuristic tool shaped by historiographical priorities rather than universal events.[9]Key debates on progress, regression, and causality
Historians have long debated whether the post-classical era, spanning roughly 500 to 1500 CE, constituted a period of net regression from classical antiquity's achievements—particularly in Western Europe—or one of transformation, continuity, and eventual progress. Early modern scholars like Petrarch labeled the early phase as "Dark Ages," citing diminished literacy, urban decay, and loss of Roman engineering following the Western Roman Empire's collapse in 476 CE, a view echoed in Edward Gibbon's attribution of decline to internal moral decay and barbarian pressures. Archaeological data supports elements of this regression: urban centers shrank dramatically, with Rome's population falling from approximately 1 million in the 2nd century CE to 20,000–50,000 by 700 CE, accompanied by abandoned aqueducts and reduced monumental construction. Trade volumes plummeted, as evidenced by sharp declines in fine pottery and amphorae distribution across the Mediterranean from the 5th to 7th centuries, indicating disrupted economic networks.[14][15] Countering this, mid-20th-century historiography, exemplified by Peter Brown's concept of "Late Antiquity" extending to 750 CE, emphasized gradual transformation rather than catastrophe, highlighting cultural adaptations like the Christian preservation of classical texts in monasteries and the Byzantine Empire's institutional continuity in the East. Scholars such as those in the "continuity school" argue that regression narratives overlook endogenous developments, such as the Carolingian Renaissance under Charlemagne (r. 768–814 CE), which revived learning through scriptoria producing thousands of manuscripts. However, empirical metrics challenge unqualified continuity claims: Western European literacy rates dropped to under 5% outside clergy, compared to 10–20% in the late Roman era, and per capita output of books fell by over 90% in the 5th–8th centuries. These findings, drawn from paleographic and excavation studies, suggest material and intellectual contraction, though biased toward Western Europe; globally, Islamic scholars advanced mathematics and medicine, compiling works like al-Khwarizmi's algebra treatise circa 820 CE.[16] ![2000 Year Temperature Comparison.png][center] Debates on causality underscore tensions between exogenous shocks and internal vulnerabilities. For initial regression, Peter Heather attributes primary causation to sustained barbarian migrations, which overwhelmed Roman frontiers and fragmented administration, as seen in the Vandal sack of Rome in 455 CE and Visigothic establishments in Gaul by 418 CE, rather than solely endogenous factors like fiscal overextension. Alternative causal models invoke climate and disease: the Late Antique Little Ice Age (536–660 CE), triggered by volcanic eruptions, coincided with crop failures and the Justinian Plague (541–549 CE), which killed 25–50 million, exacerbating depopulation already strained by earlier Antonine Plague aftereffects. Endogenous theories, critiqued for underemphasizing external pressures, point to Roman practices like latifundia concentrating land and coloni tying peasants, fostering inequality that weakened resilience.[17][18][19] On later progress, particularly from the 11th century, causal explanations diverge: institutional stabilization via feudal manorialism enabled agricultural intensification, boosting population from 25 million in 1000 CE to 73 million by 1340 CE, while the Medieval Warm Period (circa 950–1250 CE) extended growing seasons. Historians debate whether this reflected causal primacy of technological diffusion (e.g., three-field rotation increasing yields by 50%) or climatic fortune, with some attributing regression reversals to contingency rather than deterministic cycles. Mainstream academic emphasis on "transformation" over "decline" may reflect institutional incentives to rehabilitate medieval Christianity against Enlightenment critiques, yet quantitative data—such as GDP estimates halving post-400 CE before recovering—affirm phased regression followed by rebound, not seamless ascent. Controversial claims of uniform progress warrant skepticism, as Western metrics lagged Eastern and Islamic counterparts until circa 1200 CE.[20][21][22]Methodological approaches to global synthesis
Synthesizing global post-classical history requires overcoming the fragmentation of regional narratives and source materials, which vary widely in availability and reliability across Eurasia, Africa, and the Americas from approximately 500 to 1500 CE. Traditional historiography, dominated by European-focused accounts of feudalism and ecclesiastical developments, often marginalized non-Western dynamics, perpetuating a Eurocentric framework that underemphasized interconnected trade routes like the Silk Roads and Indian Ocean networks.[23] The "global turn" in medieval studies addresses this by advocating integration of diverse sources, including Arabic chronicles, Chinese annals, and Mesoamerican codices, though challenges persist due to linguistic barriers and the uneven preservation of non-literate traditions.[23] Comparative analysis emerges as a primary method, juxtaposing parallel phenomena such as state-building in Carolingian Europe, Tang-Song China, and Abbasid Islam to discern common patterns like administrative centralization amid nomadic pressures, while highlighting divergences in technological adoption.[24] Connected histories complement this by tracing causal links through exchanges, as seen in the Mongol conquests of the 13th century, which facilitated Eurasian idea diffusion via the Pax Mongolica, evidenced by shared astronomical knowledge between Persian and Chinese scholars.[24] These approaches counterbalance academic tendencies to overcorrect for prior Eurocentrism by selectively elevating peripheral narratives, yet they demand rigorous verification against primary evidence to avoid unsubstantiated diffusionist claims.[23] Interdisciplinary tools enhance synthesis, incorporating archaeological data from sites like Great Zimbabwe (flourishing circa 1100–1450 CE) and genetic studies revealing pre-Columbian contacts, such as Polynesian voyages to South America around 1200 CE.[24] Quantitative methods, including network analysis of trade artifacts, quantify connectivity, as in the distribution of Chinese porcelain across Afro-Eurasia by the 14th century.[23] However, source credibility remains critical; elite-biased texts like Byzantine histories require cross-validation with material culture to mitigate ideological distortions, ensuring causal attributions—such as pandemics' role in demographic shifts—rest on empirical convergence rather than interpretive bias.[24]Global demographic and environmental dynamics
Population fluctuations and pandemics
The period from approximately 500 to 1500 CE witnessed uneven global population growth, with estimates indicating a rise from around 210 million in 500 CE to roughly 450 million by the early 14th century, followed by sharp declines due to pandemics, warfare, and climatic stresses.[25] In Europe, post-Roman depopulation reduced numbers to an estimated 25–35 million by 600 CE, with slow recovery to about 74 million by 1340 CE, driven by agricultural improvements and relative peace in some regions.[25] Asia, particularly China, experienced more robust expansion under dynasties like the Tang (618–907 CE) and Song (960–1279 CE), with populations growing from roughly 50 million to over 100 million, though punctuated by regional epidemics and invasions.[25] These trends reflect localized booms amid broader Malthusian constraints, where subsistence limits and disease amplified volatility. The Plague of Justinian (541–549 CE), caused by Yersinia pestis and originating likely from Central Asia via rodent vectors along trade routes, marked the era's first major pandemic, with recurrences through the 8th century.[26] Contemporary accounts, such as those by Procopius, describe massive mortality in the Byzantine Empire, including up to 10,000 daily deaths in Constantinople in 542 CE, with total deaths estimated at 25–50 million across the Mediterranean, Eurasian steppes, and parts of Europe—potentially 10–25% of the global population.[26] However, archaeological and paleodemographic evidence, including pollen records and settlement continuity, suggests the plague's demographic impact may have been overstated in traditional narratives, as urban depopulation was not uniform and coincided with climatic cooling and Persian wars that independently strained resources.[27] In the Byzantine Empire, the plague exacerbated military setbacks during Justinian I's reconquests and contributed to fiscal collapse by reducing taxable populations and labor for grain production.[28] Subsequent centuries saw episodic outbreaks, but the Black Death (1346–1353 CE), another Y. pestis wave fueled by Mongol-facilitated trade and migration from the Black Sea region, inflicted the most profound global shock.[29] It reduced Europe's population by 30–50%, from approximately 74 million to 45–52 million, with mortality rates exceeding 60% in urban centers like Florence and Paris; in England, tax records indicate a 40–50% drop.[29] [30] Across Afro-Eurasia, estimates place total deaths at 75–200 million, shrinking world population from about 450 million to 350–375 million, though Asia (including China and India) experienced lower proportional losses—around 10–30%—due to prior exposures and less dense urbanization in affected zones.[29] [31] The pandemic's spread via fleas on black rats, amplified by famine-weakened immunity from the preceding Great Famine (1315–1322 CE), disrupted feudal economies, prompting labor shortages that elevated wages and accelerated the decline of serfdom in Europe.[30] Recurrent plague waves, including in the Islamic world (e.g., Egypt and the Levant, where 1348–1349 CE outbreaks killed up to one-third in urban areas) and Asia, prevented full recovery until the 16th century, with Europe's population stagnating at 50–60 million into the 1400s.[31] These pandemics, while catastrophic, interacted with endogenous factors like poor sanitation and overreliance on monoculture grains, highlighting causal vulnerabilities in pre-modern demographics rather than isolated microbial events.[32] Paleogenetic studies confirm Y. pestis's role but underscore that social connectivity via Silk Road and Indian Ocean networks accelerated transmission, with no evidence of immunity gaps explaining survival disparities across regions.[33]Climate variations and their causal impacts
The post-classical era witnessed significant climate fluctuations, beginning with the Late Antique Little Ice Age from approximately 536 to 660 CE, triggered by major volcanic eruptions in 536, 540, and 547 CE that injected aerosols into the atmosphere, leading to synchronized global cooling of up to 2.5°C in some regions.[34] This abrupt chill reduced summer temperatures, shortened growing seasons, and caused widespread crop failures, exacerbating food shortages and contributing to demographic declines across Eurasia and the Americas, though societal responses varied by institutional resilience.[35] From around 950 to 1250 CE, the Medieval Warm Period brought hemispheric warming, with northern latitudes experiencing temperatures approximately 0.3°C above the 20th-century average in proxy reconstructions from tree rings and sediments, facilitating agricultural expansions such as viticulture in northern England and Norse colonization of Greenland where conditions were 1.5°C warmer than adjacent cooling phases.[36] [37] These milder conditions supported population growth and trade by enhancing crop yields, but regional variability meant not all areas benefited equally, with some proxy data indicating the warmth was not uniformly global.[38] In the Americas, prolonged droughts from 800 to 950 CE, evidenced by lake sediment oxygen isotopes and speleothem records, intensified water scarcity in the Yucatán Peninsula, straining Maya agricultural systems reliant on rain-fed maize and contributing to the Terminal Classic collapse through famine, conflict, and urban abandonment, though sociopolitical factors like elite mismanagement amplified the crisis.[39] [40] Similarly, in Central Asia, a wet and warm pluvial phase around 1211–1225 CE, reconstructed from tree-ring precipitation data, boosted steppe pastoralism and mobility, enabling the Mongol Empire's rapid expansions under Genghis Khan by improving horse forage and logistical feasibility.[41] The transition to the Little Ice Age around 1300 CE involved gradual cooling linked to reduced solar activity and increased volcanism, resulting in harsher winters, river freezing in Europe, and recurrent famines that heightened vulnerability to diseases like the Black Death, with proxy evidence showing temperature drops of 0.5–1°C correlating with elevated mortality and social upheavals in Europe and China.[42] [43] These climate shifts underscore causal linkages to subsistence pressures but interacted with human factors such as governance and adaptation, where rigid institutions fared worse than flexible ones.[44]Agricultural innovations and subsistence patterns
In the post-classical era (c. 500–1500 CE), subsistence patterns across Eurasia, Africa, and the Americas predominantly relied on small-scale farming and herding, with arable cultivation dominant in fertile river valleys and pastoralism prevalent in arid steppes and highlands. Settled agrarian communities practiced mixed farming of grains, legumes, and livestock, often under manorial or communal systems that tied peasants to land for labor obligations, yielding minimal surpluses for local elites. Nomadic pastoralists in Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes herded sheep, horses, and cattle seasonally, supplementing diets with dairy and raiding, which sustained mobile warrior societies but limited permanent settlements.[45] In the Americas, indigenous groups employed diverse strategies including slash-and-burn in tropical lowlands and intensive raised-field systems in wetlands, supporting dense populations without draft animals or iron tools.[46] European agricultural innovations from the 8th century onward addressed soil exhaustion and labor shortages following the Roman collapse. The heavy mouldboard plow, diffused northward around 900–1000 CE, turned heavy clay soils effectively, expanding cultivable land in northern regions by up to 30% and boosting yields on marginal fields.[47] Complementing this, the three-field rotation system—emerging in the 9th century and widespread by the 11th—divided fields into thirds for winter crops, spring crops, and fallow, increasing output by approximately 50% over the two-field method by restoring soil nutrients more efficiently.[48] These changes, alongside the horse collar (adopted c. 9th century), enhanced traction for deeper plowing, fostering manorial subsistence where serfs farmed lords' demesnes for subsistence grains like wheat and barley, with surpluses enabling feudal hierarchies.[49] In the Islamic world, hydraulic engineering and crop diffusion transformed arid-zone subsistence during the 8th–12th centuries. Qanats—underground aqueducts—and water wheels (norias) expanded irrigated acreage in Persia and al-Andalus, sustaining date palms, olives, and grains on marginal lands previously limited to pastoral herding.[50] Trade networks introduced Asian crops such as sugarcane, cotton, and citrus via the 8th-century Abbasid era, diversifying diets and enabling cash-crop farming that supported urban markets, though rural patterns remained subsistence-oriented with communal irrigation maintenance.[51] East Asian innovations emphasized wet-rice intensification. In Song Dynasty China (960–1279 CE), the adoption of quick-maturing Champa rice from Vietnam around 1012 CE permitted double cropping in southern paddies, raising yields by 20–50% and converting forested areas to arable land, which underpinned population growth from 50 million to over 100 million by 1100 CE while shifting subsistence from millet to rice dominance.[52][53] In the Americas, pre-Columbian systems optimized vertical ecology without Eurasian imports. Mesoamerican chinampas—artificial islands in shallow lakes, refined by the Aztecs from c. 1300 CE—yielded up to seven maize harvests annually through nutrient-rich silt, supporting subsistence for millions in the Basin of Mexico via integrated fish farming.[46] Andean terraces, expanded under the Inca Empire (c. 1438–1533 CE), captured microclimates on steep slopes for potatoes, quinoa, and maize, irrigating 1–2 million hectares and enabling high-altitude pastoral-agricultural mixes with llama herding. These patterns prioritized resilience to variable rainfall, with communal labor (mit'a) ensuring food security amid subsistence constraints.[54]Economic and technological trends
Trade networks and commercial exchanges
The post-classical era witnessed the resurgence and intensification of interregional trade networks across Afro-Eurasia, facilitated by political consolidations in empires such as the Byzantine, Abbasid, Song Chinese, and later Mongol realms, which provided relative security against banditry and enabled the movement of goods over vast distances.[55] These networks exchanged commodities like silk, spices, porcelain, gold, salt, and slaves, alongside technologies and ideas, with volume increasing due to agricultural surpluses and urban growth; for instance, by the 11th century, Islamic merchants dominated overland and maritime routes linking the Mediterranean to the Indian subcontinent.[56] The introduction of innovations such as the Arab lateen sail and dhow ships enhanced maritime efficiency, while caravans utilizing camel caravansaries supported desert crossings.[57] The Silk Road, a constellation of overland routes spanning approximately 6,400 kilometers from China to the Mediterranean, remained a primary conduit for Eurasian commerce from the 6th to the 14th centuries, transporting Chinese silk, Central Asian horses, Indian spices, and Persian glass in exchange for Western silver and slaves.[58] Trade volume surged under the Mongol Empire's Pax Mongolica (c. 1279–1368), which imposed standardized tariffs, established relay stations for rapid communication, and reduced risks, allowing merchants like Marco Polo to traverse from Venice to Khanbaliq in relative safety and boosting exchanges of gunpowder and paper-making techniques.[59] Disruption from the Black Death and Timurid invasions in the 14th century curtailed but did not eliminate these flows, as evidenced by continued Venetian procurement of Eastern luxuries via intermediaries.[60] Maritime networks in the Indian Ocean, leveraging monsoon winds for seasonal voyages, connected East Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, India, and Southeast Asia to China from the 7th century onward, with hubs like Siraf, Quanzhou, and Kilwa facilitating the barter of African ivory and gold for Indian cottons and Chinese ceramics.[61] By 1200–1450, this system handled the bulk of global trade, with Arab, Persian, and Gujarati dhows carrying up to 100 tons of cargo per vessel, promoting the spread of Islam among coastal communities and integrating polities like the Swahili city-states into broader commercial orbits.[62] The Chola Empire's naval expeditions (c. 1010–1070) exemplified aggressive expansion to secure pepper and spice monopolies, underscoring how military power underpinned economic dominance in these waters.[57] Trans-Saharan routes, revolutionized by the adoption of the North African camel saddle around 300–400 CE but peaking in the medieval period, linked West African empires like Ghana (c. 300–1100) and Mali (c. 1230–1600) to North African markets, exporting gold dust—estimated at over 1 ton annually from Mali alone—and slaves northward in exchange for salt slabs, textiles, and copper.[56] Caravans of 5,000–12,000 camels traversed routes from Sijilmasa to Timbuktu, sustaining Islamic North Africa's minting of dinars and fueling Mediterranean demand, as demonstrated by the 1324 pilgrimage of Mansa Musa, which flooded Cairo with gold and temporarily depressed its value.[63] These exchanges fostered urban entrepôts like Audaghost and Gao, where Berber and Soninke merchants developed credit systems based on partnerships (mudaraba) to mitigate risks.[64] In Europe, trade revived from the 10th century amid feudal fragmentation, with Italian city-states like Venice, Genoa, and Amalfi pioneering Mediterranean exchanges by securing Byzantine and Levantine concessions; Venice's 1082 treaty with Byzantium granted trading quarters in Constantinople, enabling imports of spices rerouted from the Silk Road.[65] These republics developed commercial institutions such as commenda contracts for venture capital and notarial ledgers for dispute resolution, amassing wealth that financed Crusader ventures and later Renaissance patronage, though Viking and Hanseatic northern routes supplemented with furs, amber, and herring.[66] Overall, these networks not only circulated goods but also diffused monetary practices, with Islamic gold dinars influencing European coinage standards by the 12th century.[56]Technological diffusions and inventions
The diffusion of agricultural technologies profoundly shaped post-classical economies, particularly through the introduction of advanced irrigation and crop varieties across Eurasia. In the Islamic world, from the 8th to 13th centuries, the adoption of qanats (underground aqueducts) and the saqiya (animal-powered water wheel) from Persian and Indian origins enabled large-scale cultivation in arid regions, boosting yields of staples like wheat and barley by facilitating double-cropping in areas previously limited to single harvests.[50] Concurrently, the transfer of crops such as rice, sugarcane, cotton, and citrus fruits from South and East Asia to the Mediterranean via Muslim trade networks—termed the "Arab Agricultural Revolution"—increased agricultural output by an estimated 50-100% in fertile zones like al-Andalus and the Nile Valley, supporting urban growth in cities like Baghdad and Cordoba. [67] In medieval Europe, the heavy mouldboard plow, diffused from Slavic regions around 650-800 CE, allowed deeper tillage of heavy clay soils in northern latitudes, expanding arable land by up to 30% and enabling the shift to the three-field rotation system by the 9th century, which improved soil fertility and crop rotation efficiency over the two-field method.[68] The horse collar, originating in China during the 5th century but reaching Europe via the Islamic world by the 9th century, increased draft animal pulling power by 5-6 times compared to earlier yokes, facilitating faster plowing and transport.[69] Watermills, known in the Roman era but proliferated in Byzantine and Islamic contexts from the 7th century, spread to Europe by 1086 CE, with the Domesday Book recording over 5,600 in England alone for grinding grain and fulling cloth.[70] Military technologies saw pivotal diffusions that altered warfare dynamics. The stirrup, invented in India around 200-300 CE and transmitted via nomadic steppe peoples to Europe by the 8th century, enabled heavy cavalry charges by stabilizing riders, contributing to the success of Frankish and later feudal knights.[71] Gunpowder, formulated in China during the 9th century Tang dynasty for fireworks and early bombs, diffused westward through Mongol invasions by the 13th century, reaching the Islamic world where it was refined into cannons by 1240 CE and Europe by 1326 CE, as evidenced by Roger Bacon's descriptions, fundamentally shifting siege tactics and state power balances.[69] [71] Knowledge transmission accelerated via paper and numerals. Papermaking, invented in China around 105 CE but scaled in the Tang dynasty, spread to the Islamic world after the 751 CE Battle of Talas, where captured Chinese artisans established mills in Samarkand, reducing writing material costs by 90% compared to papyrus and enabling the proliferation of libraries like Baghdad's House of Wisdom by the 9th century; it reached Europe via Spain in the 12th century.[72] Hindu-Arabic numerals, systematized in India by the 6th century and transmitted through Al-Khwarizmi's 820 CE treatise, facilitated algebraic computations and replaced Roman numerals in Europe by the 13th century, underpinning banking and astronomy.[73] Navigational and metallurgical advances further integrated global systems. The magnetic compass, refined in China's Song dynasty around 960-1127 CE for maritime use, diffused to the Islamic world by the 12th century and Europe shortly after, enabling longer voyages as seen in Genoese records from 1190 CE.[70] In optics and mechanics, Ibn al-Haytham's 11th-century experiments in refraction laid groundwork for lenses, while Islamic refinements to the astrolabe improved celestial navigation accuracy to within 1-2 degrees.[74] These diffusions, often via Silk Road trade and conquest, underscore causal links between technological exchange and economic expansion, though uneven adoption—due to institutional factors like guild restrictions in Europe—limited immediate universality.[69]Monetary systems and economic institutions
In the post-classical era, monetary systems largely retained metallic coinage inherited from antiquity, with gold and silver standards predominating across Eurasia, though frequent debasements by rulers—reducing precious metal content to fund wars or deficits—undermined stability in regions like medieval Europe, where silver deniers and pennies saw progressive dilution from the 8th to 14th centuries.[75] [76] The Byzantine Empire's gold solidus (nomisma), introduced at 4.55 grams of nearly pure gold by Emperor Constantine I in 312 CE, exemplified exceptional longevity and reliability, maintaining its weight and fineness for over 700 years until debasements began under emperors like Constantine IX in the 11th century, facilitating trade across the Mediterranean and beyond as a trusted international medium.[77] [78] Islamic monetary systems, formalized under the Umayyad Caliphate, emphasized weight-based purity over nominal value, with the gold dinar (first issued in 77 AH/696–697 CE by Caliph Abd al-Malik) standardized at approximately 4.25 grams and the silver dirham at 2.97 grams, where one dinar equated to six dirhams, promoting fair exchange and influencing trade from Spain to India without the frequent adulteration seen elsewhere.[79] In East Asia, the Song Dynasty (960–1279 CE) innovated paper currency to alleviate copper coin shortages amid commercial expansion; private merchants in Sichuan issued jiaozi notes backed by deposits as early as the 10th century, with the state assuming control in 1023 CE to issue regulated bills, marking the first widespread fiduciary money system, though overissuance later fueled inflation.[80] [81] Economic institutions evolved to support expanding commerce, particularly in urban centers. European craft and merchant guilds, emerging from the 11th century in Italy and northern cities like Florence and London, enforced quality standards, apprenticeships, and price controls while limiting entry to protect members' incomes, contributing to urban growth but also stifling innovation through monopolistic practices that varied regionally and persisted until the 18th century.[82] [83] In Italian city-states, banking houses pioneered bills of exchange by the 12th century, enabling merchants to transfer funds across distances via credit instruments repaid in foreign currencies with interest disguised as exchange rate differentials, reducing risks of transporting specie and laying groundwork for modern finance, as practiced by families like the Medici from the 1390s.[84] [85] These mechanisms interconnected regional economies, with Byzantine and Islamic coins circulating widely in Eurasian trade networks, though localized debasements and institutional rigidities often constrained broader integration.[76]Religious and ideological expansions
Spread of Christianity and its variants
![Christ Enthroned from the Book of Kells][float-right] Following the deposition of Romulus Augustulus in 476 CE, marking the conventional end of the Western Roman Empire, Christianity, already the dominant religion in Roman territories, expanded among successor kingdoms through elite conversions and organized missions. Clovis I, king of the Franks, converted to Catholicism around 496 CE, aligning his realm with Roman ecclesiastical traditions and facilitating the Church's integration into Merovingian governance.[86] This royal endorsement spurred further baptisms among the Franks, establishing Gaul as a bastion against Arianism prevalent among other Germanic groups.[87] Missionary activity intensified under papal initiative; in 597 CE, Pope Gregory I sent Augustine to Kent, where King Æthelberht converted, initiating the Christianization of Anglo-Saxon England and leading to the establishment of Canterbury as an archbishopric.[88] By the 8th century, figures like Boniface evangelized among the Germans, often supported by Carolingian rulers such as Charlemagne, whose conquests and decrees enforced baptism on the Saxons between 772 and 804 CE, blending coercion with preaching.[89] In Scandinavia, conversion progressed more gradually from the 10th century, with Denmark's Harald Bluetooth declaring Christianity around 965 CE and Norway following under Olaf Tryggvason in 995 CE, though pagan resistance persisted into the 11th century.[90] In the Eastern Roman Empire, centered at Constantinople, Orthodox Christianity solidified as the state faith, influencing the Balkans and Slavs through Byzantine diplomacy and evangelism. Princes Vladimir I of Kiev adopted Orthodox rites in 988 CE, baptizing Rus' populations en masse and commissioning the construction of churches, which embedded Byzantine liturgy in Russian culture.[91] Earlier, Bulgarian Tsar Boris I converted in 864 CE under pressure from Byzantine Emperor Michael III, adopting Slavic liturgy developed by Cyril and Methodius in the 860s to counter Latin influence.[89] These efforts disseminated Orthodox variants, characterized by conciliar authority and icon veneration, contrasting with Western emphases on papal primacy. Early schisms produced distinct variants that spread independently. The Church of the East, adhering to Nestorian dyophysitism rejected at Ephesus in 431 CE, extended eastward via Persian trade routes, reaching the Tang court in China by 635 CE when missionary Alopen presented scriptures to Emperor Taizong, who granted toleration and led to temporary communities in Chang'an.[92] This branch evangelized among Turkic tribes and Mongols, with steles and inscriptions attesting presence in Central Asia by the 7th century, though it waned after the 14th-century Ilkhanate conversions to Islam.[93] Non-Chalcedonian Miaphysite churches, including Coptic in Egypt and Armenian Apostolic, maintained continuity in Africa and the Caucasus post-451 CE Council of Chalcedon, resisting Byzantine reconquests and preserving ancient rites amid Islamic expansions after 632 CE.[94] The East-West Schism of 1054 CE formalized divisions over filioque, papal authority, and liturgical practices, with mutual excommunications between Cardinal Humbert and Patriarch Michael Cerularius entrenching Catholic dominance in the Latin West and Orthodox in the Byzantine sphere.[95] Catholic missions, bolstered by the mendicant orders from the 13th century, extended to the Baltic via Teutonic Knights, forcibly converting Prussians by 1410 CE, while Orthodox influence waned in the face of Ottoman advances after 1453 CE.[90] These variants' disseminations were driven by state alliances, monastic networks, and conquests, shaping post-classical religious geography despite setbacks from pandemics and rival faiths.[87]Rise and dissemination of Islam
Islam emerged in the Arabian Peninsula during the early 7th century CE, founded by Muhammad ibn Abdullah, who received revelations beginning in 610 CE in Mecca, advocating monotheism amid a polytheistic tribal society.[96] Facing persecution, Muhammad migrated to Medina in 622 CE (the Hijra), establishing the first Muslim community and unifying disparate Arab tribes through military and diplomatic means, culminating in the conquest of Mecca in 630 CE.[97] By Muhammad's death in 632 CE, central Arabia had largely submitted to Islamic authority, setting the stage for expansion beyond the peninsula.[96] The Rashidun Caliphate (632–661 CE), led successively by Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali, oversaw swift military conquests exploiting the exhaustion of the Byzantine and Sassanid empires from mutual warfare. Under Abu Bakr, the Ridda Wars (632–633 CE) quelled Arab tribal rebellions, securing internal unity; Umar's campaigns captured Syria at the Battle of Yarmouk (636 CE), Egypt by 642 CE, and defeated the Sassanids at Qadisiyyah (636 CE) and Nahavand (642 CE), extending control to Persia by 651 CE.[97] These victories, driven by disciplined Arab armies motivated by religious zeal and prospects of booty, incorporated diverse populations under a system taxing non-Muslims (jizya) while prohibiting forced conversions, though gradual incentives like tax relief encouraged Islamization.[98] The Umayyad Caliphate (661–750 CE), based in Damascus, further expanded westward to North Africa and Spain (conquered 711 CE under Tariq ibn Ziyad) and eastward to the Indus River by 712 CE, forming one of history's largest contiguous empires spanning over 11 million square kilometers by the mid-8th century.[99] Dissemination accelerated under the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258 CE), which shifted the center to Baghdad and fostered intellectual and economic hubs facilitating cultural exchange. While initial growth relied on conquest—yielding administrative efficiency, unified Arabic administration, and tolerant policies toward "People of the Book" (Jews and Christians)—later spread occurred via trade networks, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Indian Ocean, where merchants introduced Islam without large-scale warfare; for instance, Islam reached Indonesia by the 13th century primarily through commerce.[100] Religious factors, including egalitarian doctrines appealing to lower classes and Sufi missionary efforts, complemented economic incentives like waqf endowments and zakat welfare, though empirical evidence indicates conversion rates varied regionally, with slower Islamization in Persia (full by 9th–10th centuries) versus faster in urban Syria.[98] By 800 CE, Muslim polities dominated from Iberia to Central Asia, influencing global trade and demographics, though internal schisms (e.g., Sunni-Shia split post-661 CE) and nomadic incursions later fragmented unity.[101]Persistence and evolution of Eastern religions
Hinduism persisted as the dominant religion in the Indian subcontinent throughout the post-classical period, evolving through the Bhakti movement that began in South India around the 6th century CE. This devotional tradition emphasized personal, emotional worship of deities like Vishnu, Shiva, and Devi, often bypassing ritualistic Brahmanical intermediaries and promoting accessibility across social strata via vernacular poetry composed by saints such as the Alvars (devotees of Vishnu, active 6th–9th centuries CE) and Nayanars (Shiva devotees).[102] [103] The movement spurred temple construction booms under dynasties like the Cholas (9th–13th centuries CE), with grand complexes such as the Brihadeeswarar Temple (completed 1010 CE) exemplifying architectural and theological advancements.[103] Despite Islamic incursions starting with Arab raids in the 8th century CE and accelerating under the Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 CE), Hinduism adapted by incorporating Sufi-influenced syncretic elements while maintaining core practices; its resilience stemmed from decentralized temple networks and agrarian social structures less reliant on urban monastic patronage.[104] Jainism, a contemporaneous Indian tradition, similarly endured through scholarly commentaries and merchant patronage, with schisms like Digambara-Svetambara formalized earlier but medieval texts reinforcing ethical doctrines.[105] Buddhism, originating in India, experienced sharp decline there from the 7th century CE due to Hindu philosophical resurgence (e.g., Shankara's Advaita Vedanta, c. 8th century CE), assimilation of Buddhist ideas into Hinduism, and erosion of royal support post-Pala dynasty (750–1174 CE), culminating in the destruction of key viharas like Nalanda by Turkic forces in 1193 CE. [104] However, it evolved and persisted elsewhere: in China, Mahayana variants like Chan (precursor to Zen) emphasized meditation over scriptures during the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE); in Tibet, Vajrayana Buddhism integrated with local Bon traditions under kings like Songtsen Gampo (r. 618–649 CE), developing tantric practices by the 8th century.[106] [107] In Southeast Asia, Indianized kingdoms facilitated Buddhism's adaptation; Theravada, transmitted from Sri Lanka, took root in mainland polities by the 11th century CE, with monastic reforms driving its dominance in Burma (Pagan Kingdom, 9th–13th centuries CE) and Thailand (Sukhothai Kingdom, 13th century CE onward), while Mahayana influenced maritime empires like Srivijaya (7th–13th centuries CE) before Islam's rise.[108] [109] Khmer Empire rulers, such as Jayavarman VII (r. 1181–1218 CE), shifted from Hinduism to Mahayana Theravada-influenced Buddhism, erecting monuments like Bayon.[109] Chinese Eastern traditions also advanced: Taoism peaked under Tang patronage, with emperors claiming Laozi descent and fostering alchemical and liturgical schools, though it waned late Tang before reviving in Song (960–1279 CE) under Huizong (r. 1100–1125 CE) with state-sponsored canon compilation.[110] [111] Confucianism transformed into Neo-Confucianism during Song, synthesizing cosmology with Buddhist and Daoist elements via thinkers like Zhu Xi (1130–1200 CE), stressing rational inquiry into li (principle) and moral self-cultivation as state orthodoxy to counter heterodox influences.[106] [112] These evolutions reflected pragmatic integrations amid dynastic shifts, preserving Eastern religions' emphasis on harmony, ethics, and transcendence.[110]Interfaith conflicts, conversions, and tolerances
Interfaith interactions in the post-classical era (c. 500–1500 CE) frequently involved violent conflicts fueled by territorial expansion and ideological rivalry, alongside coerced or incentivized conversions, and pragmatic tolerances shaped by political expediency rather than egalitarian principles. Major Abrahamic faiths—Christianity and Islam—expanded aggressively, often at the expense of pagan, Jewish, or rival monotheistic communities, while Eastern traditions like Hinduism and Buddhism encountered Islamic incursions in Asia with mixed resistance and adaptation. These dynamics were not merely theological but rooted in competition for resources, legitimacy, and demographic control, with religious rhetoric justifying conquests that empirical records show involved massacres, enslavements, and demographic shifts.[113] Prominent conflicts included the Crusades, a series of expeditions from 1096 to 1300 CE launched by Western European Christians against Muslim-held territories in the Levant, ostensibly to secure pilgrimage routes and holy sites but driven by feudal ambitions and papal authority consolidation. The First Crusade (1095–1099 CE) culminated in the capture of Jerusalem in 1099, where Crusaders massacred thousands of Muslim and Jewish inhabitants, with contemporary accounts estimating 10,000–70,000 deaths in the city alone, though modern historians revise this downward based on logistical constraints. Subsequent Crusades, such as the Second (1147–1149 CE), failed disastrously, with hundreds of thousands of participants perishing en route or in battle due to disease, starvation, and defeats like the failed siege of Damascus. In Iberia, the Reconquista encompassed Christian kingdoms' campaigns against Muslim al-Andalus from the 8th to 15th centuries, marked by battles like Las Navas de Tolosa in 1212 CE, which shattered Almohad power and accelerated Muslim retreats southward, culminating in Granada's fall in 1492 CE amid expulsions and forced baptisms of remaining Muslims and Jews. Islamic expansions into India from the 8th century, intensified by Mahmud of Ghazni's raids (997–1030 CE) destroying over 1,000 temples and massacring Hindu populations, exemplified clashes between monotheism and polytheism, fostering long-term demographic Islamization through violence and Sufi missionary efforts.[113][114][115] Conversions often blended voluntary adoption for social mobility with coercion, reflecting causal incentives like tax relief or survival amid conquest. In Europe, Christianization progressed unevenly: the Visigothic Kingdom mandated Catholicism in 589 CE at the Third Council of Toledo, while Charlemagne's Saxon Wars (772–804 CE) imposed mass baptisms under threat of execution, with 4,500 rebels slain in one 782 CE massacre at Verden to enforce compliance. Northern Europe's pagan holdouts faced Baltic Crusades from the 12th–13th centuries, where Teutonic Knights compelled Lithuanian conversions by 1410 CE through military subjugation. Islamic rule institutionalized conversions via the dhimmi system, where non-Muslims (primarily Jews and Christians) paid jizya poll tax and faced restrictions under the Pact of Umar (c. 7th–9th centuries), such as prohibitions on building churches or proselytizing, incentivizing shifts to Islam for equality and exemption—evident in the near-total Christian disappearance from North Africa by 1200 CE post-7th-century conquests, from demographic majorities to minorities via emigration, apostasy, and attrition. In post-Reconquista Spain, the 1502 edict forced Muslim conversions, creating the Morisco population later expelled in 1609–1614 CE, numbering around 300,000. Eastern contexts saw slower, often syncretic Islamization in India, with conversions estimated at millions over centuries, tied to Turkic invasions rather than pure persuasion.[116][117][118] Tolerances emerged pragmatically to maintain administrative stability and revenue, not from doctrinal pluralism, often imposing hierarchical subordination. Under early Islamic governance, dhimmis enjoyed protected status per Qur'anic verses (e.g., 9:29) but endured discriminatory measures like distinctive clothing and spatial segregation, as codified in the Pact of Umar, which barred non-Muslims from public office or riding horses—arrangements that preserved communities like Copts in Egypt or Jews in Yemen but eroded them over time through social pressures. The Ottoman Empire's millet system, formalized from the 15th century, granted semi-autonomy to Christian Orthodox, Armenian, and Jewish communities under their own leaders for internal affairs, including taxation and jurisprudence, fostering relative coexistence amid devshirme child levies and periodic pogroms, yet reinforcing Islamic supremacy with non-Muslims barred from the highest military or judicial roles. In Christian Europe, tolerances were rarer and episodic, such as Charlemagne's capitularies allowing some Saxon pagan practices post-conversion, but generally supplanted by inquisitorial orthodoxy; Iberia's pre-1492 convivencia involved intellectual exchanges among Muslims, Christians, and Jews but unraveled into 1391 pogroms killing thousands of Jews and forcing conversions. Mongol Ilkhanate policies (13th–14th centuries) exemplified broader tolerance, patronizing Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam interchangeably before eventual Islamization, prioritizing imperial utility over exclusivity. These mechanisms, while averting total annihilation, perpetuated second-class statuses, with empirical declines in minority populations underscoring tolerances' fragility amid power imbalances.[119][120]Political and military structures
Feudal and manorial systems
The feudal system emerged in Western Europe during the 9th and 10th centuries amid the political fragmentation following the Carolingian Empire's collapse, characterized by decentralized authority where local lords provided protection in exchange for military service from vassals.[121] This structure arose from the need for security against Viking, Magyar, and Muslim raids, as central royal power weakened, leading to the delegation of land grants known as fiefs to warriors who pledged loyalty.[122] While the term "feudalism" itself is a later scholarly construct encompassing varied practices rather than a uniform system, it fundamentally involved hierarchical bonds of mutual obligation between lords and vassals, distinct from earlier Roman or Germanic customs.[123] Core to feudalism were the rituals of homage and fealty, by which a vassal knelt before a lord, placing hands between the lord's and swearing loyalty, often formalized in ceremonies granting a fief—typically land or revenue rights—in return for specified services, primarily 40 days of annual military duty.[124] Vassalage formed a pyramid: kings at the apex sub-enfeoffing great nobles, who in turn granted portions to knights, creating layered subinfeudation that by the 11th century supported armies of mounted knights essential for warfare.[125] These ties emphasized personal oaths over abstract state authority, with breaches punishable by forfeiture, though enforcement relied on customary law rather than codified statutes.[126] Complementing feudalism's political-military framework was the manorial system, the predominant economic organization from roughly the 8th to 13th centuries, wherein lords' demesnes—self-sufficient estates averaging 1,000 to 3,000 acres—were cultivated by unfree peasants or serfs bound to the land, owing labor services like plowing fields or harvesting crops three days weekly.[127] Manors typically divided into the lord's reserved demesne (worked by villeins), peasant holdings via hereditary tenures, and common lands for grazing, with the three-field rotation system enhancing productivity by fallowing one-third of arable land annually to restore soil fertility.[125] This agrarian base funded feudal obligations, as manorial surpluses—often in grain, wool, or livestock—sustained lords' households and knightly equipage, though yields remained low at 4-6:1 seed-to-harvest ratios due to limited plows and animal power.[122] The interdependence of feudal and manorial systems fostered stability in an era of weak central governance, with lords administering justice via manorial courts and extracting banalities—fees for milling or baking—reinforcing serfdom's legal constraints, such as prohibitions on leaving the manor without permission.[128] Variations existed regionally: in England post-1066 Norman Conquest, William I's Domesday Book of 1086 cataloged over 13,000 manors under stricter royal oversight, contrasting with France's more fragmented post-Carolingian autonomies.[129] By the 12th century, however, commutation of labor into money rents signaled early strains, as urban growth and trade eroded manorial isolation.[127] Feudalism's decline accelerated in the 14th century due to demographic catastrophes like the Black Death (1347–1351), which killed 30–60% of Europe's population, creating labor shortages that empowered peasants to demand wages over services and prompted lords to lease lands commercially, undermining serfdom.[130] Concurrently, the Hundred Years' War (1337–1453) and rising monarchies, bolstered by taxation and professional armies, centralized power, reducing reliance on vassal levies—England's Edward III, for instance, funded campaigns via parliamentary grants rather than feudal summons by 1300.[131] These shifts, alongside monetary economy revival, rendered the system's personalized hierarchies obsolete, paving the way for absolutist states by the 15th century.[122]Imperial formations and centralized states
The Byzantine Empire preserved a centralized administrative framework derived from the late Roman system, organizing its territory into prefectures, dioceses, and provinces under the oversight of a sophisticated bureaucracy in Constantinople.[132] This structure emphasized imperial authority, with emperors wielding absolute power supported by civil servants and military governors known as strategoi in the theme system, which integrated defense and taxation to maintain control over diverse populations from the 7th to 15th centuries.[133] Despite territorial losses, this centralization enabled resilience against invasions until the fall of Constantinople in 1453.[134] In the Islamic world, the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258 CE) developed an elaborate centralized bureaucracy in Baghdad, featuring specialized departments called diwans for finance, military, and correspondence, overseen by a vizier as chief administrator.[135] This system replaced earlier Arab tribal governance with a professional apparatus that incorporated Persian administrative traditions, facilitating control over a vast territory stretching from North Africa to Central Asia and promoting economic and cultural integration.[136] The caliph's autocratic rule, justified through religious legitimacy, relied on salaried officials rather than feudal loyalties, though regional emirs increasingly challenged central authority by the 9th century.[137] Western Europe's Carolingian Empire under Charlemagne (r. 768–814 CE) pursued centralization through royal capitularies—decrees standardizing law, administration, and church reform—and itinerant missi dominici agents who enforced imperial edicts across Frankish lands.[138] Crowned emperor in 800 CE, Charlemagne expanded territory to include much of Western Europe, implementing counts and bishops as local governors tied directly to the court, yet this structure fragmented after his death due to weak succession mechanisms and reliance on personal loyalty.[139] East Asia's Tang Dynasty (618–907 CE) exemplified advanced centralization via the Three Departments and Six Ministries system, where a merit-based bureaucracy selected through imperial examinations managed taxation, justice, and military affairs from Chang'an.[140] This framework, building on Sui unification, controlled an empire of over 50 million subjects through prefectures and counties, enabling territorial expansion into Central Asia and cultural influence on Korea and Japan.[141] Economic policies, including equal-field land distribution, bolstered fiscal centralization until eunuch interference and rebellions eroded authority in the late 9th century.[142] Further afield, the Khmer Empire (9th–15th centuries CE) centralized hydraulic engineering around Angkor, with kings like Jayavarman VII (r. 1181–1218 CE) directing massive irrigation networks to support rice agriculture for a population exceeding one million, reinforcing divine kingship and administrative control.[143] In South Asia, the Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 CE) imposed Turkic-Mongol military governance over northern India, with sultans like Alauddin Khalji (r. 1296–1316 CE) centralizing revenue through iqta land grants and market controls, though persistent Hindu resistance limited full integration.[144] These formations highlight causal factors like bureaucratic innovation and resource mobilization as keys to sustaining imperial scale, contrasting with decentralized feudal alternatives in regions like post-Carolingian Europe.