Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Hinduism
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Hinduism |
|---|
Hinduism (/ˈhɪnduˌɪzəm/)[1] is an umbrella term[2][3][a] for a range of Indian religious and spiritual traditions (sampradayas)[4][note 1] that are unified by adherence to the concept of dharma, a cosmic order maintained by its followers through rituals and righteous living,[5][b] as expounded in the Vedas.[c] The word Hindu is an exonym,[note 2] and while Hinduism has been called the oldest surviving religion in the world,[note 3] it has also been described by the modern term Sanātana Dharma (lit. 'eternal dharma').[note 4] Vaidika Dharma (lit. 'Vedic dharma')[6] and Arya Dharma are historical endonyms for Hinduism.[7]
Hinduism entails diverse systems of thought, marked by a range of shared concepts that discuss theology, mythology, and other topics in textual sources.[8] Hindu texts have been classified into Śruti (lit. 'heard') and Smṛti (lit. 'remembered'). The major Hindu scriptures are the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Puranas, the Mahabharata (including the Bhagavad Gita), the Ramayana, and the Agamas.[9][10] Prominent themes in Hindu beliefs include the karma (action, intent and consequences),[9][11] saṃsāra (the cycle of death and rebirth) and the four Puruṣārthas, proper goals or aims of human life, namely: dharma (ethics/duties), artha (prosperity/work), kama (desires/passions) and moksha (liberation/emancipation from passions and ultimately saṃsāra).[12][13][14] Hindu religious practices include devotion (bhakti), worship (puja), sacrificial rites (yajna), and meditation (dhyana) and yoga.[15] Hinduism has no central doctrinal authority and many Hindus do not claim to belong to any denomination.[16] However, scholarly studies notify four major denominations: Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Shaktism and Smartism, .[17][18] The six Āstika schools of Hindu philosophy that recognise the authority of the Vedas are: Sankhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Mīmāṃsā, and Vedanta.[19][20]
While the traditional Itihasa-Purana and its derived Epic-Puranic chronology present Hinduism as a tradition existing for thousands of years, scholars regard Hinduism as a fusion[note 5] or synthesis[note 6] of Brahmanical orthopraxy[note 7] with various Indian cultures,[note 8] having diverse roots[note 9] and no specific founder.[21] This Hindu synthesis emerged after the Vedic period, between c. 500[22] to 200[23] BCE, and c. 300 CE,[22] in the period of the second urbanisation and the early classical period of Hinduism when the epics and the first Purānas were composed.[22][23] It flourished in the medieval period, with the decline of Buddhism in India.[24] Since the 19th century, modern Hinduism, influenced by Western culture, has acquired a great appeal in the West, most notably reflected in the popularisation of Yoga and various sects such as Transcendental Meditation and the ISKCON's Hare Krishna movement.[25]
Hinduism is the world's third-largest religion, with approximately 1.20 billion followers, or around 15% of the global population, known as Hindus,[web 1][web 2] centered mainly in India,[26] Nepal, Mauritius, and in Bali, Indonesia.[27] Significant numbers of Hindu communities are found in the countries of South Asia, in Southeast Asia, in the Caribbean, Middle East, North America, Europe, Oceania and Africa.[28][29][30]
Etymology
[edit]The word Hindū is an exonym,[31] derived from Sanskrit word Sindhu,[32] the name of the Indus River as well as the country of the lower Indus basin (Sindh).[33][34][note 10] The Proto-Iranian sound change *s > h occurred between 850 and 600 BCE.[36] "Hindu" occurs in Avesta as heptahindu, equivalent to Rigvedic sapta sindhu.[37] The 6th-century BCE inscription of Darius I mentions Hindush (referring to Sindh) among his provinces.[38][39] Hindustan (spelt "hndstn") is found in a Sasanian inscription from the 3rd century CE.[37] The term Hindu in these ancient records is a geographical term and did not refer to a religion.[40] In Arabic texts, "Hind", a derivative of Persian "Hindu", was used to refer to the land beyond the Indus[41] and therefore, all the people in that land were "Hindus", according to historian Romila Thapar.[42] By the 13th century, Hindustan emerged as a popular alternative name of India.[43]
Among the earliest known records of 'Hindu' with connotations of religion may be in the 7th-century CE Chinese text Record of the Western Regions by Xuanzang.[38] In the 14th century, 'Hindu' appeared in several texts in Persian, Sanskrit and Prakrit within India, and subsequently in vernacular languages, often in comparative contexts to contrast them with Muslims or "Turks". Examples include the 14th-century Persian text Futuhu's-salatin by 'Abd al-Malik Isami,[note 2] Jain texts such as Vividha Tirtha Kalpa and Vidyatilaka,[44] circa 1400 Apabhramsa text Kīrttilatā by Vidyapati,[45] 16–18th century Bengali Gaudiya Vaishnava texts,[46] etc. These native usages of "Hindu" were borrowed from Persian, and they did not always have a religious connotation, but they often did.[47] In Indian texts, Hindu Dharma ("Hindu religion") was often used to refer to Hinduism.[46][48]
Starting in the 17th century, European merchants and colonists adopted "Hindu" (often with the English spelling "Hindoo") to refer to residents of India as a religious community.[49][note 11] The term got increasingly associated with the practices of Brahmins, who were also referred to as "Gentiles" and "Gentoos".[49] Terms such as "Hindoo faith" and "Hindoo religion" were often used, eventually leading to the appearance of "Hindooism" in a letter of Charles Grant in 1787, who used it along with "Hindu religion".[53] The first Indian to use "Hinduism" may have been Raja Ram Mohan Roy in 1816–17.[54] By the 1840s, the term "Hinduism" was used by those Indians who opposed British colonialism, and who wanted to distinguish themselves from Muslims and Christians.[55] Before the British began to categorise communities strictly by religion, Indians generally did not define themselves exclusively through their religious beliefs; instead identities were largely segmented on the basis of locality, language, varna, jāti, occupation, and sect.[56][note 12]
Definitions
[edit]"Hinduism" is an umbrella-term,[59] referring to a broad range of sometimes opposite and often competitive traditions.[60] In Western ethnography, the term refers to the fusion,[note 5] or synthesis,[note 6][61] of various Indian cultures and traditions,[62][note 8] with diverse roots[63][note 9] and no founder.[21] This Hindu synthesis emerged after the Vedic period, between c. 500[22]–200[23] BCE and c. 300 CE,[22] in the period of the Second Urbanisation and the early classical period of Hinduism, when the epics and the first Puranas were composed.[22][23] It flourished in the medieval period, with the decline of Buddhism in India.[24] Hinduism's variations in belief and its broad range of traditions make it difficult to define as a religion according to traditional Western conceptions.[64]
Hinduism includes a diversity of ideas on spirituality and traditions; Hindus can be polytheistic, pantheistic, panentheistic, pandeistic, henotheistic, monotheistic, monistic, agnostic, atheistic or humanist.[65][66] According to Mahatma Gandhi, "a man may not believe in God and still call himself a Hindu".[67] According to Wendy Doniger, "ideas about all the major issues of faith and lifestyle – vegetarianism, nonviolence, belief in rebirth, even caste – are subjects of debate, not dogma."[56]
Because of the wide range of traditions and ideas covered by the term Hinduism, arriving at a comprehensive definition is difficult.[40] The religion "defies our desire to define and categorize it".[68] Hinduism has been variously defined as a religion, a religious tradition, a set of religious beliefs, and "a way of life".[69][note 1] From a Western lexical standpoint, Hinduism, like other faiths, is appropriately referred to as a religion. In India, the term (Hindu) dharma is used, which is broader than the Western term "religion," and refers to the religious attitudes and behaviours, the 'right way to live', as preserved and transmitted in the various traditions collectively referred to as "Hinduism."[70][71][72][b]
The study of India and its cultures and religions, and the definition of "Hinduism", has been shaped by the interests of colonialism and by Western notions of religion.[73][74] Since the 1990s, those influences and its outcomes have been the topic of debate among scholars of Hinduism,[73][note 13] and have also been taken over by critics of the Western view on India.[75][note 14]
Typology
[edit]
Hinduism as it is commonly known can be subdivided into a number of major currents. Of the historical division into six darsanas (philosophies), two schools, Vedanta and Yoga, are currently the most prominent.[76] The six āstika schools of Hindu philosophy, which recognise the authority of the Vedas are: Sānkhya, Yoga, Nyāya, Vaisheshika, Mimāmsā, and Vedānta.[19][20]
Classified by primary deity or deities, four major Hinduism modern currents are Vaishnavism (God Vishnu), Shaivism (God Shiva), Shaktism (Goddess Adi Shakti) and Smartism (five deities treated as equals).[77][78][17][18] Hinduism also accepts numerous divine beings, with many Hindus considering the deities to be aspects or manifestations of a single impersonal absolute or ultimate reality or Supreme God, while some Hindus maintain that a specific deity represents the supreme and various deities are lower manifestations of this supreme.[79] Other notable characteristics include a belief in the existence of ātman (self), reincarnation of one's ātman, and karma as well as a belief in dharma (duties, rights, laws, conduct, virtues and right way of living), although variation exists, with some not following these beliefs.
June McDaniel (2007) classifies Hinduism into six major kinds and numerous minor kinds, in order to understand the expression of emotions among the Hindus.[80] The major kinds, according to McDaniel are Folk Hinduism, based on local traditions and cults of local deities and is the oldest, non-literate system; Vedic Hinduism based on the earliest layers of the Vedas, traceable to the 2nd millennium BCE; Vedantic Hinduism based on the philosophy of the Upanishads, including Advaita Vedanta, emphasising knowledge and wisdom; Yogic Hinduism, following the text of Yoga Sutras of Patanjali emphasising introspective awareness; Dharmic Hinduism or "daily morality", which McDaniel states is stereotyped in some books as the "only form of Hindu religion with a belief in karma, cows and caste"; and bhakti or devotional Hinduism, where intense emotions are elaborately incorporated in the pursuit of the spiritual.[80]
Michaels distinguishes three Hindu religions and four forms of Hindu religiosity.[81] The three Hindu religions are "Brahmanic-Sanskritic Hinduism", "folk religions and tribal religions", and "founded religions".[82] The four forms of Hindu religiosity are the classical "karma-marga",[83] jnana-marga,[84] bhakti-marga,[84] and "heroism", which is rooted in militaristic traditions. These militaristic traditions include Ramaism (the worship of a hero of epic literature, Rama, believing him to be an incarnation of Vishnu)[85] and parts of political Hinduism.[83] "Heroism" is also called virya-marga.[84] According to Michaels, one out of nine Hindu belongs by birth to one or both of the Brahmanic-Sanskritic Hinduism and Folk religion typology, whether practising or non-practicing. He classifies most Hindus as belonging by choice to one of the "founded religions" such as Vaishnavism and Shaivism that are moksha-focussed and often de-emphasise Brahman (Brahmin) priestly authority yet incorporate ritual grammar of Brahmanic-Sanskritic Hinduism.[86] He includes among "founded religions" Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism that are now distinct religions, syncretic movements such as Brahmo Samaj and the Theosophical Society, as well as various "Guru-isms" and new religious movements such as Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, BAPS and ISKCON.[87]
Inden states that the attempt to classify Hinduism by typology started in the imperial times, when proselytising missionaries and colonial officials sought to understand and portray Hinduism from their interests.[88] Hinduism was construed as emanating not from a reason of spirit but fantasy and creative imagination, not conceptual but symbolical, not ethical but emotive, not rational or spiritual but of cognitive mysticism. This stereotype followed and fit, states Inden, with the imperial imperatives of the era, providing the moral justification for the colonial project.[88] From tribal Animism to Buddhism, everything was subsumed as part of Hinduism. The early reports set the tradition and scholarly premises for the typology of Hinduism, as well as the major assumptions and flawed presuppositions that have been at the foundation of Indology. Hinduism, according to Inden, has been neither what imperial religionists stereotyped it to be, nor is it appropriate to equate Hinduism to be merely the monist pantheism and philosophical idealism of Advaita Vedanta.[88]
Some academics suggest that Hinduism can be seen as a category with "fuzzy edges" rather than as a well-defined and rigid entity. Some forms of religious expression are central to Hinduism and others, while not as central, still remain within the category. Based on this idea Gabriella Eichinger Ferro-Luzzi has developed a 'Prototype Theory approach' to the definition of Hinduism.[89]
Sanātana Dharma
[edit]
To its adherents, Hinduism is a traditional way of life.[93] Many practitioners refer to the "orthodox" form of Hinduism as Sanātana Dharma, "the eternal law" or the "eternal way".[94][95] Hindus regard Hinduism to be thousands of years old. The Puranic chronology, as narrated in the Mahabharata, Ramayana, and the Puranas, envisions a timeline of events related to Hinduism starting well before 3000 BCE. The word dharma is used here to mean religion similar to modern Indo-Aryan languages, rather than with its original Sanskrit meaning. All aspects of a Hindu life, namely acquiring wealth (artha), fulfilment of desires (kama), and attaining liberation (moksha), are viewed here as part of "dharma", which encapsulates the "right way of living" and eternal harmonious principles in their fulfilment.[96][97] The use of the term Sanātana Dharma for Hinduism is a modern usage, based on the belief that the origins of Hinduism lie beyond human history, as revealed in the Hindu texts.[98][99][100][101][clarification needed]
Sanātana Dharma refers to "timeless, eternal set of truths" and this is how Hindus view the origins of their religion. It is viewed as those eternal truths and traditions with origins beyond human history– truths divinely revealed (Shruti) in the Vedas, the most ancient of the world's scriptures.[102][103] To many Hindus, Hinduism is a tradition that can be traced at least to the ancient Vedic era. The Western term "religion" to the extent it means "dogma and an institution traceable to a single founder" is inappropriate for their tradition, states Hatcher.[102][104][note 15]
Sanātana Dharma historically referred to the "eternal" duties religiously ordained in Hinduism, duties such as honesty, refraining from injuring living beings (ahiṃsā), purity, goodwill, mercy, patience, forbearance, self-restraint, generosity, and asceticism. These duties applied regardless of a Hindu's class, caste, or sect, and they contrasted with svadharma, one's "own duty", in accordance with one's class or caste (varṇa) and stage in life (puruṣārtha).[web 3] In recent years, the term has been used by Hindu leaders, reformers, and nationalists to refer to Hinduism. Sanatana dharma has become a synonym for the "eternal" truth and teachings of Hinduism, that transcend history and are "unchanging, indivisible and ultimately nonsectarian".[web 3]
Vaidika dharma
[edit]Some have referred to Hinduism as the Vaidika dharma,[106] bypassing the Tanttric revelations. The word 'Vaidika' in Sanskrit means 'derived from or conformable to the Veda' or 'relating to the Veda'.[web 4] Traditional scholars employed the terms Vaidika and Avaidika, those who accept the Vedas as a source of authoritative knowledge and those who do not, to differentiate various Indian schools from Jainism, Buddhism and Charvaka. According to Klaus Klostermaier, the term Vaidika dharma is the earliest self-designation of Hinduism.[107][108] According to Arvind Sharma, the historical evidence suggests that "the Hindus were referring to their religion by the term vaidika dharma or a variant thereof" by the 4th-century CE.[109] According to Brian K. Smith, "[i]t is 'debatable at the very least' as to whether the term Vaidika Dharma cannot, with the proper concessions to historical, cultural, and ideological specificity, be comparable to and translated as 'Hinduism' or 'Hindu religion'."[110]
Whatever the case, many Hindu religious sources see persons or groups which they consider as non-Vedic (and which reject Vedic varṇāśrama – 'caste and life stage' orthodoxy) as being heretics (pāṣaṇḍa/pākhaṇḍa). For example, the Bhāgavata Purāṇa considers Buddhists, Jains as well as some Shaiva groups like the Paśupatas and Kāpālins to be pāṣaṇḍas (heretics).[111]
According to Alexis Sanderson, the early Sanskrit texts differentiate between Vaidika, Vaishnava, Shaiva, Shakta, Saura, Buddhist and Jaina traditions. However, the late 1st-millennium CE Indic consensus had "indeed come to conceptualize a complex entity corresponding to Hinduism as opposed to Buddhism and Jainism excluding only certain forms of antinomian Shakta-Shaiva" from its fold.[web 5] Some in the Mimamsa school of Hindu philosophy considered the Agamas such as the Pancaratrika to be invalid because it did not conform to the Vedas. Some Kashmiri scholars rejected the esoteric tantric traditions to be a part of Vaidika dharma.[web 5][web 6] The Atimarga Shaivism ascetic tradition, datable to about 500 CE, challenged the Vaidika frame and insisted that their Agamas and practices were not only valid, they were superior than those of the Vaidikas.[web 7] However, adds Sanderson, this Shaiva ascetic tradition viewed themselves as being genuinely true to the Vedic tradition and "held unanimously that the Śruti and Smṛti of Brahmanism are universally and uniquely valid in their own sphere, [...] and that as such they [Vedas] are man's sole means of valid knowledge [...]".[web 7]
The term Vaidika dharma means a code of practice that is "based on the Vedas", but it is unclear what "based on the Vedas" really implies, states Julius Lipner.[104] The Vaidika dharma or "Vedic way of life", states Lipner, does not mean "Hinduism is necessarily religious" or that Hindus have a universally accepted "conventional or institutional meaning" for that term.[104] To many, it is as much a cultural term. Many Hindus do not have a copy of the Vedas nor have they ever seen or personally read parts of a Veda, like a Christian, might relate to the Bible or a Muslim might to the Quran. Yet, states Lipner, "this does not mean that their [Hindus] whole life's orientation cannot be traced to the Vedas or that it does not in some way derive from it".[104]
Though many religious Hindus implicitly acknowledge the authority of the Vedas, this acknowledgment is often "no more than a declaration that someone considers himself [or herself] a Hindu,"[112][note 16] and "most Indians today pay lip service to the Veda and have no regard for the contents of the text."[113] Some Hindus challenge the authority of the Vedas, thereby implicitly acknowledging its importance to the history of Hinduism, states Lipner.[104]
Legal definition
[edit]Bal Gangadhar Tilak gave the following definition in Gita Rahasya (1915): "Acceptance of the Vedas with reverence; recognition of the fact that the means or ways to salvation are diverse; and realization of the truth that the number of gods to be worshipped is large".[114][115] It was quoted by the Indian Supreme Court in 1966,[114][115] and again in 1995, "as an 'adequate and satisfactory definition,"[116] and is still the legal definition of a Hindu today.[117]
Diversity and unity
[edit]Diversity
[edit]Hindu beliefs are vast and diverse, and thus Hinduism is often referred to as a "family of religions" rather than a single religion.[web 8] Within each tradition in Hinduism, there are different theologies, practices, and sacred texts, often including unique interpretations, commentaries, and derivative works that build upon shared foundational scriptures.[118][119][120] Hinduism does not have a "unified system of belief encoded in a declaration of faith or a creed",[40] but is rather an umbrella term comprising the plurality of religious phenomena of India.[a][121] According to the Supreme Court of India,
Unlike other religions in the World, the Hindu religion does not claim any one Prophet, it does not worship any one God, it does not believe in any one philosophic concept, it does not follow any one act of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not satisfy the traditional features of a religion or creed. It is a way of life and nothing more".[122]
Part of the problem with a single definition of the term Hinduism is the fact that Hinduism does not have a founder.[123] It is a synthesis of various traditions,[124] the "Brahmanical orthopraxy, the renouncer traditions and popular or local traditions".[125]
Theism is also difficult to use as a unifying doctrine for Hinduism, because while some Hindu philosophies postulate a theistic ontology of creation, other Hindus are or have been atheists.[126]
Sense of unity
[edit]Despite the differences, there is also a sense of unity.[127] Most Hindu traditions revere a body of religious or sacred literature, the Vedas,[128] although there are exceptions.[129] These texts are a reminder of the ancient cultural heritage and point of pride for Hindus,[130][131] though Louis Renou stated that "even in the most orthodox domains, the reverence to the Vedas has come to be a simple raising of the hat".[130][132]
Halbfass states that, although Shaivism and Vaishnavism may be regarded as "self-contained religious constellations",[127] there is a degree of interaction and reference between the "theoreticians and literary representatives"[127] of each tradition that indicates the presence of "a wider sense of identity, a sense of coherence in a shared context and of inclusion in a common framework and horizon".[127]
Classical Hinduism
[edit]Brahmins played an essential role in the development of the post-Vedic Hindu synthesis, disseminating Vedic culture to local communities, and integrating local religiosity into the trans-regional Brahmanic culture.[133] In the post-Gupta period Vedanta developed in southern India, where orthodox Brahmanic culture and the Hindu culture were preserved,[134] building on ancient Vedic traditions while "accommoda[ting] the multiple demands of Hinduism."[135]
Medieval developments
[edit]The notion of common denominators for several religions and traditions of India further developed from the 12th century CE.[136] Lorenzen traces the emergence of a "family resemblance", and what he calls as "beginnings of medieval and modern Hinduism" taking shape, at c. 300–600 CE, with the development of the early Puranas, and continuities with the earlier Vedic religion.[137] Lorenzen states that the establishment of a Hindu self-identity took place "through a process of mutual self-definition with a contrasting Muslim Other".[138] According to Lorenzen, this "presence of the Other"[138] is necessary to recognise the "loose family resemblance" among the various traditions and schools.[139]

According to the Indologist Alexis Sanderson, before Islam arrived in India, the "Sanskrit sources differentiated Vaidika, Vaiṣṇava, Śaiva, Śākta, Saura, Buddhist, and Jaina traditions, but they had no name that denotes the first five of these as a collective entity over and against Buddhism and Jainism". This absence of a formal name, states Sanderson, does not mean that the corresponding concept of Hinduism did not exist. By late 1st-millennium CE, the concept of a belief and tradition distinct from Buddhism and Jainism had emerged.[web 5] This complex tradition accepted in its identity almost all of what is currently Hinduism, except certain antinomian tantric movements.[web 5] Some conservative thinkers of those times questioned whether certain Shaiva, Vaishnava and Shakta texts or practices were consistent with the Vedas, or were invalid in their entirety. Moderates then, and most orthoprax scholars later, agreed that though there are some variations, the foundation of their beliefs, the ritual grammar, the spiritual premises, and the soteriologies were the same. "This sense of greater unity", states Sanderson, "came to be called Hinduism".[web 5]
According to Nicholson, already between the 12th and the 16th centuries "certain thinkers began to treat as a single whole the diverse philosophical teachings of the Upanishads, epics, Puranas, and the schools known retrospectively as the 'six systems' (saddarsana) of mainstream Hindu philosophy."[140] The tendency of "a blurring of philosophical distinctions" has also been noted by Mikel Burley.[141] Hacker called this "inclusivism"[128] and Michaels speaks of "the identificatory habit".[8] Lorenzen locates the origins of a distinct Hindu identity in the interaction between Muslims and Hindus,[142] and a process of "mutual self-definition with a contrasting Muslim other",[143][38] which started well before 1800.[144] Michaels notes:
As a counteraction to Islamic supremacy and as part of the continuing process of regionalization, two religious innovations developed in the Hindu religions: the formation of sects and a historicization which preceded later nationalism ... [S]aints and sometimes militant sect leaders, such as the Marathi poet Tukaram (1609–1649) and Ramdas (1608–1681), articulated ideas in which they glorified Hinduism and the past. The Brahmins also produced increasingly historical texts, especially eulogies and chronicles of sacred sites (Mahatmyas), or developed a reflexive passion for collecting and compiling extensive collections of quotations on various subjects.[145]
Colonial views
[edit]The notion and reports on "Hinduism" as a "single world religious tradition"[146] were also popularised by 19th-century proselytising missionaries and European Indologists, roles sometimes served by the same person, who relied on texts preserved by Brahmins (priests) for their information of Indian religions, and animist observations that the missionary Orientalists presumed was Hinduism.[146][88][147] These reports influenced perceptions about Hinduism. Scholars such as Pennington state that the colonial polemical reports led to fabricated stereotypes where Hinduism was mere mystic paganism devoted to the service of devils,[note 17] while other scholars state that the colonial constructions influenced the belief that the Vedas, Bhagavad Gita, Manusmriti and such texts were the essence of Hindu religiosity, and in the modern association of 'Hindu doctrine' with the schools of Vedanta (in particular Advaita Vedanta) as a paradigmatic example of Hinduism's mystical nature".[149][note 18] Pennington, while concurring that the study of Hinduism as a world religion began in the colonial era, disagrees that Hinduism is a colonial European era invention.[150] He states that the shared theology, common ritual grammar and way of life of those who identify themselves as Hindus is traceable to ancient times.[150][note 19]
Hindu modernism and neo-Vedanta
[edit]
All of religion is contained in the Vedanta, that is, in the three stages of the Vedanta philosophy, the Dvaita, Vishishtâdvaita and Advaita; one comes after the other. These are the three stages of spiritual growth in man. Each one is necessary. This is the essential of religion: the Vedanta, applied to the various ethnic customs and creeds of India, is Hinduism.
This inclusivism[159] was further developed in the 19th and 20th centuries by Hindu reform movements and Neo-Vedanta,[160] and has become characteristic of modern Hinduism.[128]
Beginning in the 19th century, Indian modernists re-asserted Hinduism as a major asset of Indian civilisation,[74] meanwhile "purifying" Hinduism from its Tantric elements[161] and elevating the Vedic elements. Western stereotypes were reversed, emphasising the universal aspects, and introducing modern approaches of social problems.[74] This approach had great appeal, not only in India, but also in the west.[74] Major representatives of "Hindu modernism"[162] are Ram Mohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Mahatma Gandhi.[163]
Raja Rammohan Roy is known as the father of the Hindu Renaissance.[164] He was a major influence on Swami Vivekananda, who, according to Flood, was "a figure of great importance in the development of a modern Hindu self-understanding and in formulating the West's view of Hinduism".[165] Central to his philosophy is the idea that the divine exists in all beings, that all human beings can achieve union with this "innate divinity",[162] and that seeing this divine as the essence of others will further love and social harmony.[162] According to Vivekananda, there is an essential unity to Hinduism, which underlies the diversity of its many forms.[162] According to Flood, Vivekananda's vision of Hinduism "is one generally accepted by most English-speaking middle-class Hindus today".[166] Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan sought to reconcile western rationalism with Hinduism, "presenting Hinduism as an essentially rationalistic and humanistic religious experience".[167]
This "Global Hinduism"[168] has a worldwide appeal, transcending national boundaries[168] and, according to Flood, "becoming a world religion alongside Christianity, Islam and Buddhism",[168] both for the Hindu diaspora communities and for westerners who are attracted to non-western cultures and religions.[168] It emphasises universal spiritual values such as social justice, peace and "the spiritual transformation of humanity".[168] It has developed partly due to "re-enculturation",[169] or the pizza effect,[169] in which elements of Hindu culture have been exported to the West, gaining popularity there, and as a consequence also gained greater popularity in India.[169] This globalisation of Hindu culture brought "to the West teachings which have become an important cultural force in western societies, and which in turn have become an important cultural force in India, their place of origin".[170]
Modern India and the world
[edit]The Hindutva movement has extensively argued for the unity of Hinduism, dismissing the differences and regarding India as a Hindu-country since ancient times.[171] And there are assumptions of political dominance of Hindu nationalism in India, also known as 'Neo-Hindutva'.[172][173] There have also been increase in pre-dominance of Hindutva in Nepal, similar to that of India.[174] The scope of Hinduism is also increasing in the other parts of the world, due to the cultural influences such as Yoga and Hare Krishna movement by many missionaries organisations, especially by ISKCON and this is also due to the migration of Indian Hindus to the other nations of the world.[175][176] Hinduism is growing fast in many western nations and in some African nations.[note 20]
Main traditions
[edit]Denominations
[edit]
Hinduism has no central doctrinal authority and many practising Hindus do not claim to belong to any particular denomination or tradition.[16] Four major denominations are, however, used in scholarly studies: Shaivism, Shaktism, Smartism, and Vaishnavism.[77][78][17][18] These denominations differ primarily in the central deity worshipped, the traditions and the soteriological outlook.[179] The denominations of Hinduism, states Lipner, are unlike those found in major religions of the world, because Hindu denominations are fuzzy with individuals practising more than one, and he suggests the term "Hindu polycentrism".[180]
There are no census data available on demographic history or trends for the traditions within Hinduism.[181] Estimates vary on the relative number of adherents in the different traditions of Hinduism. According to a 2020 estimate by The World Religion Database (WRD), hosted at Boston University's Institute on Culture, Religion and World Affairs (CURA), the Vaishnavism tradition is the largest group with about 399 million Hindus, followed by Shaivism with 385 million Hindus, Shaktism with 305 million Hindus and other traditions including Neo-Hinduism and Reform Hinduism with 25 million Hindus.[182] In contrast, according to Jones and Ryan, Shaivism is the largest tradition of Hinduism.[183][note 21]
Vaishnavism is the devotional religious tradition that worships Vishnu[note 22] and his avatars, particularly Krishna and Rama.[185] The adherents of this sect are generally non-ascetic, monastic, oriented towards community events and devotionalism practices inspired by "intimate loving, joyous, playful" Krishna and other Vishnu avatars.[179] These practices sometimes include community dancing, singing of Kirtans and Bhajans, with sound and music believed by some to have meditative and spiritual powers.[186] Temple worship and festivals are typically elaborate in Vaishnavism.[187] The Bhagavad Gita and the Ramayana, along with Vishnu-oriented Puranas provide its theistic foundations.[188]
Shaivism is the tradition that focuses on Shiva. Shaivas are more attracted to ascetic individualism, and it has several sub-schools.[179] Their practices include bhakti-style devotionalism, yet their beliefs lean towards nondual, monistic schools of Hinduism such as Advaita and Raja Yoga.[189][186] Some Shaivas worship in temples, while others emphasise yoga, striving to be one with Shiva within.[190] Avatars are uncommon, and some Shaivas visualise god as half male, half female, as a fusion of the male and female principles (Ardhanarishvara). Shaivism is related to Shaktism, wherein Shakti is seen as spouse of Shiva.[189] Community celebrations include festivals, and participation, with Vaishnavas, in pilgrimages such as the Kumbh Mela.[191] Shaivism has been more commonly practised in the Himalayan north from Kashmir to Nepal, and in south India.[192]
Shaktism focuses on goddess worship of Shakti or Devi as cosmic mother,[179] and it is particularly common in northeastern and eastern states of India such as Assam and Bengal. Devi is depicted as in gentler forms like Parvati, the consort of Shiva; or, as fierce warrior goddesses like Kali and Durga. Followers of Shaktism recognise Shakti as the power that underlies the male principle. Shaktism is also associated with Tantra practices.[193] Community celebrations include festivals, some of which include processions and idol immersion into sea or other water bodies.[194]
Smartism centers its worship simultaneously on all the major Hindu deities: Shiva, Vishnu, Shakti, Ganesha, Surya and Skanda.[195] The Smarta tradition developed during the (early) Classical Period of Hinduism around the beginning of the Common Era, when Hinduism emerged from the interaction between Brahmanism and local traditions.[196][197] The Smarta tradition is aligned with Advaita Vedanta, and regards Adi Shankara as its founder or reformer, who considered worship of God-with-attributes (Saguna Brahman) as a journey towards ultimately realising God-without-attributes (nirguna Brahman, Atman, Self-knowledge).[198][199] The term Smartism is derived from Smriti texts of Hinduism, meaning those who remember the traditions in the texts.[189][200] This Hindu sect practices a philosophical Jnana yoga, scriptural studies, reflection, meditative path seeking an understanding of Self's oneness with God.[189][201]
Ethnicities
[edit]

Hinduism is traditionally a multi- or polyethnic religion. On the Indian subcontinent, it is widespread among many Indo-Aryan, Dravidian and other South Asian ethnic groups,[202] for example, the Meitei people (Tibeto-Burman ethnicity in the northeastern Indian state Manipur).[203]
In addition, in antiquity and the Middle Ages, Hinduism was the state religion in many Indianized kingdoms of Asia, the Greater India – from Afghanistan (Kabul) in the West and including almost all of Southeast Asia in the East (Cambodia, Vietnam, Indonesia, partly Philippines) – and only by the 15th century was nearly everywhere supplanted by Buddhism and Islam,[204][205] except several still Hindu minor Austronesian ethnic groups, such as the Balinese[27] and Tenggerese people[206] in Indonesia, and the Chams in Vietnam.[207] Also, a small community of the Afghan Pashtuns who migrated to India after partition remain committed to Hinduism.[208]
The Indo-Aryan Kalash people in Pakistan traditionally practice an indigenous religion which is closely related to ancient Indo-Iranian religion, and resembles the ancient Vedic religion.[209] While it has been related to Greek religion, due to an origin-narrative which says that the Kalash descend from Alexander the Great's Greek soldiers, the Kalash speak an Indo-Aryan language, and their religion is closer to Hinduism than to the religion of Alexander's army.[210]
There are many new ethnic Ghanaian Hindus in Ghana, who have converted to Hinduism due to the works of Swami Ghanananda Saraswati and Hindu Monastery of Africa[211] From the beginning of the 20th century, by the forces of Baba Premananda Bharati (1858–1914), Swami Vivekananda, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and other missionaries, Hinduism gained a certain distribution among the Western peoples.[212]
Scriptures
[edit]
The ancient scriptures of Hinduism are initially in Vedic Sanskrit and later in classical Sanskrit. These texts are classified into two: Shruti and Smriti. Shruti is apauruṣeyā, (lit. 'not made of a man') but revealed by the rishis (lit. 'seers'), and regarded as having the highest authority, while the smriti are manmade and have secondary authority.[213] They are the two highest sources of dharma, the other two being Śiṣṭa Āchāra/Sadāchara (lit. 'conduct of noble people') and finally Ātma tuṣṭi (lit. 'what is pleasing to oneself').[note 24]
Hindu scriptures were composed, memorised and transmitted verbally, across generations, for many centuries before they were written down.[214][215]
Shruti (lit. 'that which is heard')[216] primarily refers to the Vedas, which form the earliest record of the Hindu scriptures, and are regarded as eternal truths revealed to the ancient sages (rishis).[217] There are four Vedas – Rigveda, Samaveda, Yajurveda and Atharvaveda. Each Veda has been subclassified into four major text types – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (text discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge).[218][219][220][221] The first two parts of the Vedas were subsequently called the Karmakāṇḍa (ritualistic portion), while the last two form the Jñānakāṇḍa (knowledge portion, discussing spiritual insight and philosophical teachings).[222][223][224][225]
The Upanishads are the foundation of Hindu philosophical thought and have profoundly influenced diverse traditions.[226][227][155] Of the Shrutis (Vedic corpus), the Upanishads alone are widely influential among Hindus, considered scriptures par excellence of Hinduism, and their central ideas have continued to influence its thoughts and traditions.[226][153] Indian philosopher Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan states that the Upanishads have played a dominating role ever since their appearance.[228] There are 108 Muktikā Upanishads in Hinduism, of which between 10 and 13 are variously counted by scholars as Principal Upanishads.[225][229]
The most notable of the Smritis (lit. 'that which is remembered') are the Hindu epics and the Puranas (lit. 'that which is ancient'). The epics consist of the Mahabharata and the Ramayana. The Bhagavad Gita is an integral part of the Mahabharata and one of the most popular sacred texts of Hinduism.[230] It is sometimes called Gitopanishad, then placed in the Shruti ("heard") category, being Upanishadic in content.[231] The Puranas, which started to be composed of c. 300 CE onward,[232] contain extensive mythologies, and are central in the distribution of common themes of Hinduism through vivid narratives. The Yoga Sutras is a classical text for the Hindu Yoga tradition, which gained renewed popularity in the 20th century.[233]
Since the 19th century, Indian modernists have re-asserted the 'Aryan origins' of Hinduism, "purifying" Hinduism from its Tantric elements[161] and elevating the Vedic elements. Hindu modernists like Vivekananda see the Vedas as the laws of the spiritual world, which would still exist even if they were not revealed to the sages.[234][235]
Tantra are the religious scriptures that give prominence to the female energy of the deity that in her personified form has both gentle and fierce form. In Tantric tradition, Radha, Parvati, Durga, and Kali are worshipped symbolically as well as in their personified forms.[236] The Agamas in Tantra refer to authoritative scriptures or the teachings of Shiva to Shakti,[237] while Nigamas refers to the Vedas and the teachings of Shakti to Shiva.[237] In Agamic schools of Hinduism, the Vedic literature and the Agamas are equally authoritative.[238][239]
Beliefs
[edit]Prominent themes in Hindu beliefs include (but are not restricted to) Dharma (ethics/duties), Saṃsāra (the continuing cycle of entanglement in passions and the resulting birth, life, death, and rebirth), Karma (action, intent, and consequences), moksha (liberation from attachment and saṃsāra), and the various yogas (paths or practices).[11] However, not all of these themes are found among the various different systems of Hindu beliefs. Beliefs in moksha or saṃsāra are absent in certain Hindu beliefs, and were also absent among early forms of Hinduism, which was characterised by a belief in an Afterlife, with traces of this still being found among various Hindu beliefs, such as Śrāddha. Ancestor worship once formed an integral part of Hindu beliefs and is today still found as an important element in various Folk Hindu streams.[240][241][242][243][244][245][246]
Purusharthas
[edit]Purusharthas refers to the objectives of human life. Classical Hindu thought accepts four proper goals or aims of human life, known as Puruṣārthas – Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha.[247][248]
Dharma (moral duties, righteousness, ethics)
[edit]Dharma is considered the foremost goal of a human being in Hinduism.[249] The concept of dharma includes behaviours that are considered to be in accord with rta, the order that makes life and universe possible,[250] and includes duties, rights, laws, conduct, virtues and "right way of living".[251] Hindu dharma includes the religious duties, moral rights and duties of each individual, as well as behaviours that enable social order, right conduct, and those that are virtuous.[251] Dharma is that which all existing beings must accept and respect to sustain harmony and order in the world. It is the pursuit and execution of one's nature and true calling, thus playing one's role in cosmic concert.[252] The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad states it as:
Nothing is higher than Dharma. The weak overcomes the stronger by Dharma, as over a king. Truly that Dharma is the Truth (Satya); Therefore, when a man speaks the Truth, they say, "He speaks the Dharma"; and if he speaks Dharma, they say, "He speaks the Truth!" For both are one.
— Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, 1.4.xiv[253][254]
In the Mahabharata, Krishna defines dharma as upholding both this-worldly and other-worldly affairs. (Mbh 12.110.11). The word Sanātana means eternal, perennial, or forever; thus, Sanātana Dharma signifies that it is the dharma that has neither beginning nor end.[255]
Artha (the means or resources needed for a fulfilling life)
[edit]Artha is the virtuous pursuit of means, resources, assets, or livelihood, for the purpose of meeting obligations, economic prosperity, and to have a fulfilling life. It is inclusive of political life, diplomacy, and material well-being. The artha concept includes all "means of life", activities and resources that enables one to be in a state one wants to be in, wealth, career and financial security.[13] The proper pursuit of artha is considered an important aim of human life in Hinduism.[256][257]
A central premise of Hindu philosophy is that every person should live a joyous, pleasurable and fulfilling life, where every person's needs are acknowledged and fulfilled. A person's needs can only be fulfilled when sufficient means are available. Artha, then, is best described as the pursuit of the means necessary for a joyous, pleasurable and fulfilling life.[258]
Kāma (sensory, emotional and aesthetic pleasure)
[edit]Kāma (Sanskrit, Pali: काम) means desire, wish, passion, longing, and pleasure of the senses, the aesthetic enjoyment of life, affection and love, with or without sexual connotations.[259][260]

In contemporary Indian literature kama is often used to refer to sexual desire, but in ancient Indian literature kāma is expansive and includes any kind of enjoyment and pleasure, such as pleasure deriving from the arts. The ancient Indian Epic the Mahabharata describes kama as any agreeable and desirable experience generated by the interaction of one or more of the five senses with anything associated with that sense, when in harmony with the other goals of human life (dharma, artha and moksha).[261]
In Hinduism, kama is considered an essential and healthy goal of human life when pursued without sacrificing dharma, artha and moksha.[262]
Mokṣa (liberation, freedom from suffering)
[edit]Moksha (Sanskrit: मोक्ष, romanized: mokṣa) or mukti (Sanskrit: मुक्ति) is the ultimate, most important goal in Hinduism. Moksha is a concept associated with liberation from sorrow, suffering, and for many theistic schools of Hinduism, liberation from samsara (a birth-rebirth cycle). A release from this eschatological cycle in the afterlife is called moksha in theistic schools of Hinduism.[252][263][264]

Due to the belief in Hinduism that the Atman is eternal, and the concept of Purusha (the cosmic self or cosmic consciousness),[265] death can be seen as insignificant in comparison to the eternal Atman or Purusha.[266]
Differing views on the nature of moksha
[edit]The meaning of moksha differs among the various Hindu schools of thought.
Advaita Vedanta holds that upon attaining moksha a person knows their essence, or self, to be pure consciousness or the witness-consciousness and identifies it as identical to Brahman.[267][268]
More generally, in the theistic schools of Hinduism moksha is usually seen as liberation from saṃsāra, while for other schools, such as the monistic school, moksha happens during a person's lifetime and is a psychological concept.[269][267][270][271][268]
According to Deutsch, moksha is a transcendental consciousness of the perfect state of being, of self-realization, of freedom, and of "realizing the whole universe as the Self".[269][267][271] Moksha when viewed as a psychological concept, suggests Klaus Klostermaier,[268] implies a setting free of hitherto fettered faculties, a removing of obstacles to an unrestricted life, permitting a person to be more truly a person in the fullest sense. This concept presumes an unused human potential of creativity, compassion and understanding which had been previously blocked and shut out.[268]
Due to these different views on the nature of moksha, the Vedantic school separates this into two views – Jivanmukti (liberation in this life) and Videhamukti (liberation after death).[268][272][273]
Karma and saṃsāra
[edit]Karma translates literally as action, work, or deed,[274] and also refers to a Vedic theory of "moral law of cause and effect".[275][276] The theory is a combination of (1) causality that may be ethical or non-ethical; (2) ethicisation, that is good or bad actions have consequences; and (3) rebirth.[277] Karma theory is interpreted as explaining the present circumstances of an individual with reference to their actions in the past. These actions and their consequences may be in a person's current life, or, according to some schools of Hinduism, in past lives.[277][278] This cycle of birth, life, death and rebirth is called saṃsāra. Liberation from saṃsāra through moksha is believed to ensure lasting happiness and peace.[279][280] Hindu scriptures teach that the future is both a function of current human effort derived from free will and past human actions that set the circumstances.[281] The idea of reincarnation, or saṃsāra, is not mentioned in the early layers of historical Hindu texts such as the Rigveda.[282][283] The later layers of the Rigveda do mention ideas that suggest an approach towards the idea of rebirth, according to Ranade.[284][285] According to Sayers, these earliest layers of Hindu literature show ancestor worship and rites such as sraddha (offering food to the ancestors). The later Vedic texts such as the Aranyakas and the Upanisads show a different soteriology based on reincarnation, they show little concern with ancestor rites, and they begin to philosophically interpret the earlier rituals.[286][287][288] The idea of reincarnation and karma have roots in the Upanishads of the late Vedic period, predating the Buddha and the Mahavira.[289][290]
Concept of God
[edit]Hinduism is a diverse system of thought with a wide variety of beliefs[65][291][web 11] its concept of God is complex and depends upon each individual and the tradition and philosophy followed. It is sometimes referred to as henotheistic (i.e., involving devotion to a single god while accepting the existence of others), but any such term is an overgeneralisation.[292][293]
Who really knows?
Who will here proclaim it?
Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation?
The gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe.
Who then knows whence it has arisen?
— Nasadiya Sukta, concerns the origin of the universe, Rigveda, 10:129–6[294][295][296]
The Nasadiya Sukta (Creation Hymn) of the Rig Veda is one of the earliest texts[297] which "demonstrates a sense of metaphysical speculation" about what created the universe, the concept of god(s) and The One, and whether even The One knows how the universe came into being.[298][299] The Rig Veda praises various deities, none superior nor inferior, in a henotheistic manner.[300] The hymns repeatedly refer to One Truth and One Ultimate Reality. The "One Truth" of Vedic literature, in modern era scholarship, has been interpreted as monotheism, monism, as well as a deified Hidden Principles behind the great happenings and processes of nature.[301]
Hindus believe that all living creatures have a Self. This true "Self" of every person, is called the ātman. The Self is believed to be eternal.[302] According to the monistic/pantheistic (non-dualist) theologies of Hinduism (such as Advaita Vedanta school), this Atman is indistinct from Brahman, the supreme spirit or the Ultimate Reality.[303] The goal of life, according to the Advaita school, is to realise that one's Self is identical to supreme Self, that the supreme Self is present in everything and everyone, all life is interconnected and there is oneness in all life.[304][305][306] Dualistic schools (Dvaita and Bhakti) understand Brahman as a Supreme Being separate from individual Selfs.[307] They worship the Supreme Being variously as Vishnu, Brahma, Shiva, or Shakti, depending upon the sect. God is called Ishvara, Bhagavan, Parameshwara, Deva or Devi, and these terms have different meanings in different schools of Hinduism.[308][309][310]
Hindu texts accept a polytheistic framework, but this is generally conceptualised as the divine essence or luminosity that gives vitality and animation to the inanimate natural substances.[311] There is a divine in everything, human beings, animals, trees and rivers. It is observable in offerings to rivers, trees, tools of one's work, animals and birds, rising sun, friends and guests, teachers and parents.[311][312][313] It is the divine in these that makes each sacred and worthy of reverence, rather than them being sacred in and of themselves. This perception of divinity manifested in all things, as Buttimer and Wallin view it, makes the Vedic foundations of Hinduism quite distinct from animism, in which all things are themselves divine.[311] The animistic premise sees multiplicity, and therefore an equality of ability to compete for power when it comes to man and man, man and animal, man and nature, etc. The Vedic view does not perceive this competition, equality of man to nature, or multiplicity so much as an overwhelming and interconnecting single divinity that unifies everyone and everything.[311][314][315]
The Hindu scriptures name celestial entities called Devas (or Devi in feminine form), which may be translated into English as gods or heavenly beings.[note 25] The devas are an integral part of Hindu culture and are depicted in art, architecture and through icons, and stories about them are related in the scriptures, particularly in Indian epic poetry and the Puranas. They are, however, often distinguished from Ishvara, a personal god, with many Hindus worshipping Ishvara in one of its particular manifestations as their iṣṭa devatā, or chosen ideal.[316][317] The choice is a matter of individual preference,[318] and of regional and family traditions.[318][note 26] The multitude of Devas is considered manifestations of Brahman.[320]

The word avatar does not appear in the Vedic literature;[321] It appears in verb forms in post-Vedic literature, and as a noun particularly in the Puranic literature after the 6th century CE.[322] Theologically, the reincarnation idea is most often associated with the avatars of Hindu god Vishnu, though the idea has been applied to other deities.[323] Varying lists of avatars of Vishnu appear in Hindu scriptures, including the ten Dashavatara of the Garuda Purana and the twenty-two avatars in the Bhagavata Purana, though the latter adds that the incarnations of Vishnu are innumerable.[324] The avatars of Vishnu are important in Vaishnavism theology. In the goddess-based Shaktism tradition, avatars of the Devi are found and all goddesses are considered to be different aspects of the same metaphysical Brahman[325] and Shakti (energy).[326][327] While avatars of other deities such as Ganesha and Shiva are also mentioned in medieval Hindu texts, this is minor and occasional.[328]
Both theistic and atheistic ideas, for epistemological and metaphysical reasons, are profuse in different schools of Hinduism. The early Nyaya school of Hinduism, for example, was non-theist/atheist,[329] but later Nyaya school scholars argued that God exists and offered proofs using its theory of logic.[330][331] Other schools disagreed with Nyaya scholars. Samkhya,[332] Mimamsa[333] and Carvaka schools of Hinduism, were non-theist/atheist, arguing that "God was an unnecessary metaphysical assumption".[web 12][334][335] Its Vaisheshika school started as another non-theistic tradition relying on naturalism and that all matter is eternal, but it later introduced the concept of a non-creator God.[336][337][338] The Yoga school of Hinduism accepted the concept of a "personal god" and left it to the Hindu to define their god.[339] Advaita Vedanta taught a monistic, abstract Self and Oneness in everything, with no room for gods or deity, a perspective that Mohanty calls, "spiritual, not religious".[340] Bhakti sub-schools of Vedanta taught a creator God that is distinct from each human being.[307]

God in Hinduism is often represented having both the feminine and masculine aspects. The notion of the feminine in deity is much more pronounced and is evident in the pairings of Shiva with Parvati (Ardhanarishvara), Vishnu accompanied by Lakshmi, Radha with Krishna and Sita with Rama.[341]
According to Graham Schweig, Hinduism has the strongest presence of the divine feminine in world religion from ancient times to the present.[342] The goddess is viewed as the heart of the most esoteric Saiva traditions.[343]
Authority
[edit]Authority and eternal truths play an important role in Hinduism.[344] Religious traditions and truths are believed to be contained in its sacred texts, which are accessed and taught by sages, gurus, saints or avatars.[344] But there is also a strong tradition of the questioning of authority, internal debate and challenging of religious texts in Hinduism. The Hindus believe that this deepens the understanding of the eternal truths and further develops the tradition. Authority "was mediated through [...] an intellectual culture that tended to develop ideas collaboratively, and according to the shared logic of natural reason."[344] Narratives in the Upanishads present characters questioning persons of authority.[344] The Kena Upanishad repeatedly asks kena, 'by what' power something is the case.[344] The Katha Upanishad and Bhagavad Gita present narratives where the student criticises the teacher's inferior answers.[344] In the Shiva Purana, Shiva questions Vishnu and Brahma.[344] Doubt plays a repeated role in the Mahabharata.[344] Jayadeva's Gita Govinda presents criticism via Radha.[344]
Titles such as Guru, Acharya, or Mahacharya may be used to remark authority in Hindu and yogic traditions.
Practices
[edit]Rituals
[edit]
Most Hindus observe religious rituals at home.[346] The rituals vary greatly among regions, villages, and individuals. They are not mandatory in Hinduism. The nature and place of rituals is an individual's choice. Some devout Hindus perform daily rituals such as worshiping at dawn after bathing (usually at a family shrine, and typically includes lighting a lamp and offering foodstuffs before the images of deities), recitation from religious scripts, singing bhajans (devotional hymns), yoga, meditation, chanting mantras and others.[347]
Vedic rituals of fire-oblation (yajna) and chanting of Vedic hymns are observed on special occasions, such as a Hindu wedding.[348] Other major life-stage events, such as rituals after death, include the yajña and chanting of Vedic mantras.[web 13]
The words of the mantras are "themselves sacred,"[349] and "do not constitute linguistic utterances."[350] Instead, as Klostermaier notes, in their application in Vedic rituals they become magical sounds, "means to an end."[note 27] In the Brahmanical perspective, the sounds have their own meaning, mantras are considered "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer.[350] By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base. As long as the purity of the sounds is preserved, the recitation of the mantras will be efficacious, irrespective of whether their discursive meaning is understood by human beings."[350][333]
Sādhanā
[edit]Sādhanā is derived from the root "sādh-", meaning "to accomplish", and denotes a means for the realisation of spiritual goals. Although different denominations of Hinduism have their own particular notions of sādhana, they share the feature of liberation from bondage. They differ on what causes bondage, how one can become free of that bondage, and who or what can lead one on that path.[351][352]
Life-cycle rites of passage
[edit]Major life stage milestones are celebrated as sanskara (saṃskāra, rites of passage) in Hinduism.[353][354] The rites of passage are not mandatory, and vary in details by gender, community and regionally.[355] Gautama Dharmasutras composed in about the middle of 1st millennium BCE lists 48 sanskaras,[356] while Gryhasutra and other texts composed centuries later list between 12 and 16 sanskaras.[353][357] The list of sanskaras in Hinduism include both external rituals such as those marking a baby's birth and a baby's name giving ceremony, as well as inner rites of resolutions and ethics such as compassion towards all living beings and positive attitude.[356]
The major traditional rites of passage in Hinduism include[355] Garbhadhana (pregnancy), Pumsavana (rite before the fetus begins moving and kicking in womb), Simantonnayana (parting of pregnant woman's hair, baby shower), Jatakarman (rite celebrating the new born baby), Namakarana (naming the child), Nishkramana (baby's first outing from home into the world), Annaprashana (baby's first feeding of solid food), Chudakarana (baby's first haircut, tonsure), Karnavedha (ear piercing), Vidyarambha (baby's start with knowledge), Upanayana (entry into a school rite),[358][359] Keshanta and Ritusuddhi (first shave for boys, menarche for girls), Samavartana (graduation ceremony), Vivaha (wedding), Vratas (fasting, spiritual studies) and Antyeshti (cremation for an adult, burial for a child).[360] In contemporary times, there is regional variation among Hindus as to which of these sanskaras are observed; in some cases, additional regional rites of passage such as Śrāddha (ritual of feeding people after cremation) are practised.[355][361]
Bhakti (worship)
[edit]Bhakti refers to devotion, participation in and the love of a personal god or a representational god by a devotee.[web 14][362] Bhakti-marga is considered in Hinduism to be one of many possible paths of spirituality and alternative means to moksha.[363] The other paths, left to the choice of a Hindu, are Jnana-marga (path of knowledge), Karma-marga (path of works), Rāja-marga (path of contemplation and meditation).[364][365]
Bhakti is practised in a number of ways, ranging from reciting mantras, japas (incantations), to individual private prayers in one's home shrine,[366] or in a temple before a murti or sacred image of a deity.[367][368] Hindu temples and domestic altars, are important elements of worship in contemporary theistic Hinduism.[369] While many visit a temple on special occasions, most offer daily prayers at a domestic altar, typically a dedicated part of the home that includes sacred images of deities or gurus.[369]
One form of daily worship is aarati, or "supplication", a ritual in which a flame is offered and "accompanied by a song of praise".[370] Notable aaratis include Om Jai Jagdish Hare, a Hindi prayer to Vishnu, and Sukhakarta Dukhaharta, a Marathi prayer to Ganesha.[371][372] Aarti can be used to make offerings to entities ranging from deities to "human exemplar[s]".[370] For instance, Aarti is offered to Hanuman, a devotee of God, in many temples, including Balaji temples, where the primary deity is an incarnation of Vishnu.[373] In Swaminarayan temples and home shrines, aarati is offered to Swaminarayan, considered by followers to be Supreme God.[374]
Other personal and community practices include puja as well as aarati,[375] kirtan, or bhajan, where devotional verses and hymns are read or poems are sung by a group of devotees.[web 15][376] While the choice of the deity is at the discretion of the Hindu, the most observed traditions of Hindu devotion include Vaishnavism, Shaivism, and Shaktism.[377] A Hindu may worship multiple deities, all as henotheistic manifestations of the same ultimate reality, cosmic spirit and absolute spiritual concept called Brahman.[378][379][320] Bhakti-marga, states Pechelis, is more than ritual devotionalism, it includes practices and spiritual activities aimed at refining one's state of mind, knowing god, participating in god, and internalising god.[380][381] While bhakti practices are popular and easily observable aspect of Hinduism, not all Hindus practice bhakti, or believe in god-with-attributes (saguna Brahman).[382][383] Concurrent Hindu practices include a belief in god-without-attributes (nirguna Brahman), and god within oneself.[384][385]
Festivals
[edit]


Hindu festivals (Sanskrit: Utsava; literally: "to lift higher") are ceremonies that weave individual and social life to dharma.[386][387] Hinduism has many festivals throughout the year, where the dates are set by the lunisolar Hindu calendar, many coinciding with either the full moon (Holi) or the new moon (Diwali), often with seasonal changes.[388] Some festivals are found only regionally and they celebrate local traditions, while a few such as Holi and Diwali are pan-Hindu.[388][389] The festivals typically celebrate events from Hinduism, connoting spiritual themes and celebrating aspects of human relationships such as the sister-brother bond over the Raksha Bandhan (or Bhai Dooj) festival.[387][390] The same festival sometimes marks different stories depending on the Hindu denomination, and the celebrations incorporate regional themes, traditional agriculture, local arts, family get togethers, Puja rituals and feasts.[386][391]
Some major regional or pan-Hindu festivals include:
- Ashadhi Ekadashi
- Bonalu
- Chhath
- Dashain
- Diwali or Tihar or Deepawali
- Durga Puja
- Dussehra
- Ganesh Chaturthi
- Gowri Habba
- Gudi Padwa
- Holi
- Karva Chauth
- Kartika Purnima
- Krishna Janmashtami
- Maha Shivaratri
- Makar Sankranti
- Navaratri
- Onam
- Pongal
- Radhashtami
- Raksha Bandhan
- Rama Navami
- Ratha Yatra
- Sharad Purnima
- Shigmo
- Thaipusam
- Ugadi
- Vasant Panchami
- Vishu
Pilgrimage
[edit]Many adherents undertake pilgrimages, which have historically been an important part of Hinduism and remain so today.[392] Pilgrimage sites are called Tirtha, Kshetra, Gopitha or Mahalaya.[393][394] The process or journey associated with Tirtha is called Tirtha-yatra.[395] According to the Hindu text Skanda Purana, Tirtha are of three kinds: Jangam Tirtha is to a place movable of a sadhu, a rishi, a guru; Sthawar Tirtha is to a place immovable, like Benaras, Haridwar, Mount Kailash, holy rivers; while Manas Tirtha is to a place of mind of truth, charity, patience, compassion, soft speech, Self.[396][397] Tīrtha-yatra is, states Knut A. Jacobsen, anything that has a salvific value to a Hindu, and includes pilgrimage sites such as mountains or forests or seashore or rivers or ponds, as well as virtues, actions, studies or state of mind.[398][399]
Pilgrimage sites of Hinduism are mentioned in the epic Mahabharata and the Puranas.[400][401] Most Puranas include large sections on Tirtha Mahatmya along with tourist guides,[402] which describe sacred sites and places to visit.[403][404][405] In these texts, Varanasi (Benares, Kashi), Rameswaram, Kanchipuram, Dwarka, Puri, Haridwar, Sri Rangam, Vrindavan, Ayodhya, Tirupati, Mayapur, Nathdwara, twelve Jyotirlinga and Shakti Pitha have been mentioned as particularly holy sites, along with geographies where major rivers meet (sangam) or join the sea.[406][401] Kumbh Mela is another major pilgrimage on the eve of the solar festival Makar Sankranti. This pilgrimage rotates at a gap of three years among four sites: Prayagraj at the confluence of the Ganges and Yamuna rivers, Haridwar near source of the Ganges, Ujjain on the Shipra river and Nashik on the bank of the Godavari river.[407] This is one of world's largest mass pilgrimage, with an estimated 40 to 100 million people attending the event.[407][408][web 16] At this event, they say a prayer to the sun and bathe in the river,[407] a tradition attributed to Adi Shankara.[409]

Some pilgrimages are part of a Vrata (vow), which a Hindu may make for a number of reasons.[410][411] It may mark a special occasion, such as the birth of a baby, or as part of a rite of passage such as a baby's first haircut, or after healing from a sickness.[412][413] It may also be the result of prayers answered.[412] An alternative reason for Tirtha, for some Hindus, is to respect wishes or in memory of a beloved person after their death.[412] This may include dispersing their cremation ashes in a Tirtha region in a stream, river or sea to honour the wishes of the dead. The journey to a Tirtha, assert some Hindu texts, helps one overcome the sorrow of the loss.[412][note 28]
Other reasons for a Tirtha in Hinduism is to rejuvenate or gain spiritual merit by travelling to famed temples or bathe in rivers such as the Ganges.[416][417][418] Tirtha has been one of the recommended means of addressing remorse and to perform penance, for unintentional errors and intentional sins, in the Hindu tradition.[419][420] The proper procedure for a pilgrimage is widely discussed in Hindu texts.[421] The most accepted view is that the greatest austerity comes from travelling on foot, or part of the journey is on foot, and that the use of a conveyance is only acceptable if the pilgrimage is otherwise impossible.[422]
Culture
[edit]The term "Hindu culture" refers to mean aspects of culture that pertain to the religion, such as festivals and dress codes followed by the Hindus which is mainly can be inspired from the culture of India and Southeast Asia.
Architecture
[edit]Hindu architecture is the traditional system of Indian architecture for structures such as temples, monasteries, statues, homes, market places, gardens and town planning as described in Hindu texts.[423][424] The architectural guidelines survive in Sanskrit manuscripts and in some cases also in other regional languages. These texts include the Vastu shastras, Shilpa Shastras, the Brihat Samhita, architectural portions of the Puranas and the Agamas, and regional texts such as the Manasara among others.[425][426]
By far the most important, characteristic and numerous surviving examples of Hindu architecture are Hindu temples, with an architectural tradition that has left surviving examples in stone, brick, and rock-cut architecture dating back to the Gupta Empire. These architectures had influence of Ancient Persian and Hellenistic architecture.[427] Far fewer secular Hindu architecture have survived into the modern era, such as palaces, homes and cities. Ruins and archaeological studies provide a view of early secular architecture in India.[428]
Studies on Indian palaces and civic architectural history have largely focussed on the Mughal and Indo-Islamic architecture particularly of the northern and western India given their relative abundance. In other regions of India, particularly the South, Hindu architecture continued to thrive through the 16th-century, such as those exemplified by the temples, ruined cities and secular spaces of the Vijayanagara Empire and the Nayakas.[429][430] The secular architecture was never opposed to the religious in India, and it is the sacred architecture such as those found in the Hindu temples which were inspired by and adaptations of the secular ones. Further, states Harle, it is in the reliefs on temple walls, pillars, toranas and madapams where miniature version of the secular architecture can be found.[431]
Art
[edit]
Hindu art encompasses the artistic traditions and styles culturally connected to Hinduism and have a long history of religious association with Hindu scriptures, rituals and worship.
Calendar
[edit]The Hindu calendar, Panchanga (Sanskrit: पञ्चाङ्ग) or Panjika is one of various lunisolar calendars that are traditionally used in the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia, with further regional variations for social and Hindu religious purposes. They adopt a similar underlying concept for timekeeping based on sidereal year for solar cycle and adjustment of lunar cycles in every three years, but differ in their relative emphasis to moon cycle or the sun cycle and the names of months and when they consider the New Year to start.[432] Of the various regional calendars, the most studied and known Hindu calendars are the Shalivahana Shaka (Based on the King Shalivahana, also the Indian national calendar) found in the Deccan region of Southern India and the Vikram Samvat (Bikrami) found in Nepal and the North and Central regions of India – both of which emphasise the lunar cycle. Their new year starts in spring. In regions such as Tamil Nadu and Kerala, the solar cycle is emphasised and this is called the Tamil calendar (though Tamil calendar uses month names like in Hindu Calendar) and Malayalam calendar and these have origins in the second half of the 1st millennium CE.[432][433] A Hindu calendar is sometimes referred to as Panchangam (पञ्चाङ्गम्), which is also known as Panjika in Eastern India.[434]
The ancient Hindu calendar conceptual design is also found in the Hebrew calendar, the Chinese calendar, and the Babylonian calendar, but different from the Gregorian calendar.[435] Unlike the Gregorian calendar which adds additional days to the month to adjust for the mismatch between twelve lunar cycles (354 lunar days)[436] and nearly 365 solar days, the Hindu calendar maintains the integrity of the lunar month, but inserts an extra full month, once every 32–33 months, to ensure that the festivals and crop-related rituals fall in the appropriate season.[435][433]
The Hindu calendars have been in use in the Indian subcontinent since Vedic times, and remain in use by the Hindus all over the world, particularly to set Hindu festival dates. Early Buddhist communities of India adopted the ancient Vedic calendar, later Vikrami calendar and then local Buddhist calendars. Buddhist festivals continue to be scheduled according to a lunar system.[437] The Buddhist calendar and the traditional lunisolar calendars of Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Thailand are also based on an older version of the Hindu calendar. Similarly, the ancient Jain traditions have followed the same lunisolar system as the Hindu calendar for festivals, texts and inscriptions. However, the Buddhist and Jain timekeeping systems have attempted to use the Buddha and the Mahavira's lifetimes as their reference points.[438][439][440]
The Hindu calendar is also important to the practice of Hindu astrology and zodiac system. It is also employed for observing the auspicious days of deities and occasions of fasting, such as Ekadashi.[441]
Physical culture
[edit]Person and society
[edit]Varnas
[edit]
Hindu society has been categorised into four classes, called varṇas. They are the Brahmins: Vedic teachers and priests; the Kshatriyas: warriors and kings; the Vaishyas: farmers and merchants; and the Shudras: servants and labourers.[442] The Bhagavad Gītā links the varṇa to an individual's duty (svadharma), inborn nature (svabhāva), and natural tendencies (guṇa).[443] The Manusmriti categorises the different castes.[web 17] Some mobility and flexibility within the varṇas challenge allegations of social discrimination in the caste system, as has been pointed out by several sociologists,[444][445] although some other scholars disagree.[446] Scholars debate whether the so-called caste system is part of Hinduism sanctioned by the scriptures or social custom.[447][web 18][note 29] And various contemporary scholars have argued that the caste system was introduced by the British colonial regime; which is indeed false as it existed even before the westerners came to India.[448]
A renunciant man of knowledge is usually called Varṇatita or "beyond all varṇas" in Vedantic works. The bhiksu is advised to not bother about the caste of the family from which he begs his food. Scholars like Adi Sankara affirm that not only is Brahman beyond all varṇas, the man who is identified with Him also transcends the distinctions and limitations of caste.[449]
Yoga
[edit]
In whatever way a Hindu defines the goal of life, there are several methods (yogas) that sages have taught for reaching that goal. Yoga is a Hindu discipline which trains the body, mind, and consciousness for health, tranquility, and spiritual insight.[450] Texts dedicated to yoga include the Yoga Sutras, the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, the Bhagavad Gita and, as their philosophical and historical basis, the Upanishads. Yoga is means, and the four major marga (paths) of Hinduism are: Bhakti Yoga (the path of love and devotion), Karma Yoga (the path of right action), Rāja Yoga (the path of meditation), and Jñāna Yoga (the path of wisdom)[451] An individual may prefer one or some yogas over others, according to their inclination and understanding. Practice of one yoga does not exclude others. The modern practice of yoga as exercise (traditionally Hatha yoga) has a contested relationship with Hinduism.[452]
Symbolism
[edit]
Hinduism has a developed system of symbolism and iconography to represent the sacred in art, architecture, literature and worship. These symbols gain their meaning from the scriptures or cultural traditions. The syllable Om (which represents the Brahman and Atman) has grown to represent Hinduism itself, while other markings such as the Swastika (from the Sanskrit: स्वस्तिक, romanized: svastika) a sign that represents auspiciousness,[453] and Tilaka (literally, seed) on forehead – considered to be the location of spiritual third eye,[454] marks ceremonious welcome, blessing or one's participation in a ritual or rite of passage.[455] Elaborate Tilaka with lines may also identify a devotee of a particular denomination. Flowers, birds, animals, instruments, symmetric mandala drawings, objects, lingam, idols are all part of symbolic iconography in Hinduism.[456][457] [458]
Ahiṃsā and food customs
[edit]Hindus advocate the practice of ahiṃsā (nonviolence) and respect for all life because divinity is believed to permeate all beings, including plants and non-human animals.[459] The term ahiṃsā appears in the Upanishads,[460] the epic Mahabharata[461] and ahiṃsā is the first of the five Yamas (vows of self-restraint) in Patanjali's Yoga Sutras.[462] Hindu texts such as Śāṇḍilya Upanishad[463] and Svātmārāma[464][465] recommend Mitahara (eating in moderation) as one of the Yamas (virtuous Self restraints). According to Hindu beliefs, food affects the body, mind, and spirit.[466][467] The Bhagavad Gita links body and mind to food one consumes in verses 17.8 through 17.10.[468]
In accordance with ahiṃsā, many Hindus embrace vegetarianism to respect higher forms of life. Estimates of strict lacto vegetarians in India (includes adherents of all religions) who never eat any meat, fish or eggs vary between 20% and 42%, while others are either less strict vegetarians or non-vegetarians.[469] Those who eat meat seek Jhatka (quick death) method of meat production, and dislike Halal (slow bled death) method, believing that quick death method reduces suffering to the animal.[470][471] The food habits vary with region, with Bengali Hindus and Hindus living in Himalayan regions, or river delta regions, regularly eating meat and fish.[472] Some avoid meat on specific festivals or occasions.[473] Observant Hindus who do eat meat almost always abstain from beef. Hinduism specifically considers Bos indicus to be sacred.[474][475][476] The cow in Hindu society is traditionally identified as a caretaker and a maternal figure,[477] and Hindu society honours the cow as a symbol of unselfish giving,[478] selfless sacrifice, gentleness and tolerance.[479] There are many Hindu groups that have continued to abide by a strict vegetarian diet in modern times. Some adhere to a diet that is devoid of meat, eggs, and seafood.[480]
Some Hindus such as those belonging to the Shaktism tradition,[481] and Hindus in regions such as Bali and Nepal[482][483] practise animal sacrifice.[482] The sacrificed animal is eaten as ritual food.[484] In contrast, the Vaishnava Hindus abhor and vigorously oppose animal sacrifice.[485][486] The principle of non-violence to animals has been so thoroughly adopted in Hinduism that animal sacrifice is uncommon[487] and historically reduced to a vestigial marginal practice.[488]
Institutions
[edit]Temple
[edit]A Hindu temple is a house of god(s).[489] It is a space and structure designed to bring human beings and gods together, infused with symbolism to express the ideas and beliefs of Hinduism.[490] A temple incorporates all elements of Hindu cosmology, the highest spire or dome representing Mount Meru – reminder of the abode of Brahma and the center of spiritual universe,[491] the carvings and iconography symbolically presenting dharma, kama, artha, moksha and karma.[492][493] The layout, the motifs, the plan and the building process recite ancient rituals, geometric symbolisms, and reflect beliefs and values innate within various schools of Hinduism.[490] Hindu temples are spiritual destinations for many Hindus (not all), as well as landmarks for arts, annual festivals, rite of passage rituals, and community celebrations.[494][495]
Hindu temples come in many styles, diverse locations, deploy different construction methods and are adapted to different deities and regional beliefs.[496] Two major styles of Hindu temples include the Gopuram style found in south India, and Nagara style found in north India.[web 20][web 21] Other styles include cave, forest and mountain temples.[497] Yet, despite their differences, almost all Hindu temples share certain common architectural principles, core ideas, symbolism and themes.[490]
Many temples feature one or more idols (murtis). The idol and Grabhgriya in the Brahma-pada (the center of the temple), under the main spire, serves as a focal point (darsana, a sight) in a Hindu temple.[498] In larger temples, the central space typically is surrounded by an ambulatory for the devotee to walk around and ritually circumambulate the Purusa (Brahman), the universal essence.[490]
Asrama
[edit]
Traditionally the life of a Hindu is divided into four Āśramas (phases or life stages; another meaning includes monastery).[499] The four ashramas are: Brahmacharya (student), Grihastha (householder), Vānaprastha (retired) and Sannyasa (renunciation).[500] Brahmacharya represents the bachelor student stage of life. Grihastha refers to the individual's married life, with the duties of maintaining a household, raising a family, educating one's children, and leading a family-centred and a dharmic social life.[500] Grihastha stage starts with Hindu wedding, and has been considered the most important of all stages in sociological context, as Hindus in this stage not only pursued a virtuous life, they produced food and wealth that sustained people in other stages of life, as well as the offsprings that continued mankind.[501] Vanaprastha is the retirement stage, where a person hands over household responsibilities to the next generation, took an advisory role, and gradually withdrew from the world.[502][503] The Sannyasa stage marks renunciation and a state of disinterest and detachment from material life, generally without any meaningful property or home (ascetic state), and focused on Moksha, peace and simple spiritual life.[504][505]
The Ashramas system has been one facet of the dharma concept in Hinduism.[501] Combined with four proper goals of human life (Purusartha), the Ashramas system traditionally aimed at providing a Hindu with fulfilling life and spiritual liberation.[501] While these stages are typically sequential, any person can enter Sannyasa (ascetic) stage and become an Ascetic at any time after the Brahmacharya stage.[506] Sannyasa is not religiously mandatory in Hinduism, and elderly people are free to live with their families.[507]
Monasticism
[edit]
Some Hindus choose to live a monastic life (Sannyāsa) in pursuit of liberation (moksha) or another form of spiritual perfection.[15] Monastics commit themselves to a simple and celibate life, detached from material pursuits, of meditation and spiritual contemplation.[508] A Hindu monk is called a Sanyāsī, Sādhu, or Swāmi. A female renunciate is called a Sanyāsini. Renunciates receive high respect in Hindu society because of their simple ahiṃsā-driven lifestyle and dedication to spiritual liberation (moksha) – believed to be the ultimate goal of life in Hinduism.[505] Some monastics live in monasteries, while others wander from place to place, depending on donated food and charity for their needs.[509]
History
[edit]
Hinduism's varied history[11] overlaps or coincides with the development of religion in the Indian subcontinent since the Iron Age, with some of its traditions tracing back to prehistoric religions such as those of the Bronze Age Indus Valley Civilisation. While the traditional Itihasa-Purana and the Epic-Puranic chronology derived from it present Hinduism as a tradition existing for thousands of years, scholars regard Hinduism as a synthesis[510][22] of various Indian cultures and traditions,[22][125][510] with diverse roots[63] and no single founder,[511][note 30] which emerged after the Vedic period, between c. 500[22]–200[23] BCE and c. 300 CE.[22]
The history of Hinduism is often divided into periods of development. The first period is the pre-Vedic period, which includes the Indus Valley Civilization and local pre-historic religions, ending at about 1750 BCE. This period was followed in northern India by the Vedic period, which saw the introduction of the historical Vedic religion with the Indo-Aryan migrations, starting somewhere between 1900 BCE to 1400 BCE.[515][note 31] The subsequent period, between 800 BCE and 200 BCE, is "a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions",[518] and a formative period for Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism. The Epic and Early Puranic period, from c. 200 BCE to 500 CE, saw the classical "Golden Age" of Hinduism (c. 320–650 CE), which coincides with the Gupta Empire. In this period the six branches of Hindu philosophy evolved, namely Samkhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Mīmāṃsā, and Vedanta. Monotheistic sects like Shaivism and Vaishnavism developed during this same period through the Bhakti movement. The period from roughly 650 to 1100 CE forms the late Classical period[8] or early Middle Ages, in which classical Puranic Hinduism is established, and Adi Shankara's influential consolidation of Advaita Vedanta.[519]

Hinduism under both Hindu and Islamic rulers from c. 1250–1750 CE,[520][521] saw the increasing prominence of the Bhakti movement, which remains influential today. Historic persecutions of Hindus happened under Muslim rulers[522] and also by Christian Missionaries.[523] In Goa, the 1560 inquisition by Portuguese colonists is also considered one of the most brutal persecutions of Hindus.[524] The colonial period saw the emergence of various Hindu reform movements partly inspired by western movements, such as Unitarianism and Theosophy.[525] In the Kingdom of Nepal, the Unification of Nepal by Shah dynasty was accompanied by the Hinduization of the state and continued till the c. 1950s.[526][failed verification] Indians were hired as plantation labourers in British colonies such as Fiji, Mauritius, Trinidad and Tobago.[527] The Partition of India in 1947 was along religious lines, with the Republic of India emerging with a Hindu majority.[528] Between 200,000 and one million people, including both Muslims and Hindus, were killed during the Partition of India.[529] During the 20th century, due to the Indian diaspora, Hindu minorities have formed in all continents, with the largest communities in absolute numbers in the United States,[530] and the United Kingdom.[531]
Although religious conversion from and to Hinduism has been a controversial and debated subject in India, Nepal,[532][533][534] and in Indonesia,[535][note 32] in the 20th–21st century, many missionary organisations such as ISKCON, Sathya Sai Organization, Vedanta Society have been influential in spreading the core culture of Hinduism outside India.[note 20] Religious leaders of some Hindu reform movements such as the Arya Samaj launched Shuddhi movement to proselytise and reconvert Muslims and Christians back to Hinduism,[537][538] while those such as the Brahmo Samaj suggested Hinduism to be a non-missionary religion.[536] All these sects of Hinduism have welcomed new members to their group, while other leaders of Hinduism's diverse schools have stated that given the intensive proselytisation activities from missionary Islam and Christianity, this "there is no such thing as proselytism in Hinduism" view must be re-examined.[536][537][539] There have also been an increase of Hindu identity in politics, mostly in India, Nepal and Bangladesh in the form of Hindutva.[540] The revivalist movement was mainly started and encouraged by many organisations like RSS, BJP and other organisations of Sangh Parivar in India, while there are also many Hindu nationalist parties and organisations such as Shivsena Nepal and RPP in Nepal, HINDRAF in Malaysia, etc.[541][526]
Demographics
[edit]
Hinduism is the largest religion in India, followed by around 80% of the country's population of 1.21 billion (2011 census) (966 million adherents).[543] India contains 94% of the global Hindu population.[544][545] Other significant populations are found in Nepal (23 million), Bangladesh (13 million) and the Indonesian island of Bali (3.9 million).[546] A significant population of Hindus are also present in Pakistan (5.2 million).[547] The majority of the Indonesian Tenggerese people[206] in Java and the Vietnamese Cham people also follow Hinduism, with the largest proportion of the Chams in Ninh Thuận Province.[548]
Demographically, Hinduism is the world's third largest religion, after Christianity and Islam.[549][550] Hinduism is the third fastest-growing religion in the world after Islam and Christianity, with a predicted growth rate of 34% between 2010 and 2050.[551]
Countries with the greatest proportion of Hindus:
Nepal – 81.3%[552]
India – 80.0%[553]
Mauritius – 48.5%[554]
Guyana – 31%[555]
Fiji – 27.9%[556]
Trinidad and Tobago – 24.3%[557]
Bhutan – 22.6%[558]
Suriname – 22.3%[559]
Qatar – 15.9%[560]
Sri Lanka – 12.6%[561]
Bahrain – 9.8%[562]
Bangladesh – 7.9%[563]
Réunion – 6.8%[note 33]
United Arab Emirates – 6.6%[564]
Malaysia – 6.3%[565]
Kuwait – 6%[566]
Oman – 5.5%[567]
Seychelles – 5.4% [568]
Singapore – 5%[569]
Indonesia – 3.9%[570]
New Zealand – 2.9%[571]
Australia – 2.7%[572]
Pakistan – 2.2%[573]
| Tradition | Followers | Follower dynamics | World dynamics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vaishnavism | 399,526,000 | ||
| Shaivism | 385,423,000 | ||
| Shaktism | 305,643,000 | ||
| Neo-Hinduism | 20,300,000 | ||
| Reform Hinduism | 5,200,000 | ||
| Cumulative | 1,116,092,000 |
See also
[edit]- Hinduism
- Related systems and religions
- Adivasi religion
- Ayyavazhi
- Bathouism
- Donyi-Polo
- Dravidian folk religion
- Eastern religions
- Eastern philosophy
- Gurung shamanism
- Bon
- Hinduism and other religions
- Indian religions
- Kalash religion
- Kiratism
- Sarna sthal
- Manichaeism
- Peterburgian Vedism
- Proto-Indo-European religion
- Proto-Indo-Iranian religion
- Hinduism and science
- Sanamahism
- Sarnaism
- Sikhism
- Tribal religions in India
- Zoroastrianism
- Religion of the Indus Valley Civilization
- Ancient Iranian religion
Notes
[edit]- ^ a b Hinduism is variously defined as a "religion", "set of religious beliefs and practices", "religious tradition", "way of life" (Sharma 2003, pp. 12–13), etc. For a discussion on the topic, see: "Establishing the boundaries" in Flood 2003, pp. 1–17.
- ^ a b There are several views on the earliest mention of 'Hindu' in the context of religion:
- Flood 1996, p. 6 states: "In Arabic texts, Al-Hind is a term used for the people of modern-day India and 'Hindu', or 'Hindoo', was used towards the end of the eighteenth century by the British to refer to the people of 'Hindustan', the people of northwest India. Eventually 'Hindu' became virtually equivalent to an 'Indian' who was not a Muslim, Sikh, Jain, or Christian, thereby encompassing a range of religious beliefs and practices. The '-ism' was added to Hindu in around 1830 to denote the culture and religion of the high-caste Brahmans in contrast to other religions, and the term was soon appropriated by Indians themselves in the context of building a national identity opposed to colonialism, though the term 'Hindu' was used in Sanskrit and Bengali hagiographic texts in contrast to 'Yavana' or Muslim as early as the sixteenth century."
- Sharma 2002 and other scholars state that the 7th-century Chinese scholar Xuanzang, whose 17-year travel to India and interactions with its people and religions were recorded and preserved in the Chinese language, uses the transliterated term In-tu whose "connotation overflows in the religious".(Sharma 2002) Xuanzang describes Hindu Deva-temples of the early 7th century CE, worship of Sun deity and Shiva, his debates with scholars of Samkhya and Vaisheshika schools of Hindu philosophies, monks and monasteries of Hindus, Jains and Buddhists (both Mahayana and Theravada), and the study of the Vedas along with Buddhist texts at Nalanda. See also Gosch & Stearns 2007, pp. 88–99, Sharma 2011, pp. 5–12, Smith et al. 2012, pp. 321–324.
- Sharma 2002 also mentions the use of the word Hindu in Islamic texts such as those relating to the 8th-century Arab invasion of Sindh by Muhammad ibn Qasim, Al Biruni's 11th-century text Tarikh Al-Hind, and those of the Delhi Sultanate period, where the term Hindu retains the ambiguities of including all non-Islamic people such as Buddhists and of being "a region or a religion".
- Lorenzen 2006 states, citing Richard Eaton: "one of the earliest occurrences of the word 'Hindu' in Islamic literature appears in 'Abd al-Malik Isami's Persian work, Futuhu's-Salatin, composed in the Deccan in 1350. In this text, 'Isami uses the word 'hindi' to mean Indian in the ethno-geographical sense and the word 'hindu' to mean 'Hindu' in the sense of a follower of the Hindu religion".(Lorenzen 2006, p. 33)
- Lorenzen 2006, pp. 32–33 also mentions other non-Persian texts such as Prithvíráj Ráso by ~12th century Canda Baradai, and epigraphical inscription evidence from Andhra Pradesh kingdoms who battled military expansion of Muslim dynasties in the 14th century, where the word 'Hindu' partly implies a religious identity in contrast to 'Turks' or Islamic religious identity.
- Lorenzen 2006, p. 15 states that one of the earliest uses of word 'Hindu' in religious context, in a European language (Spanish), was the publication in 1649 by Sebastiao Manrique.
- ^ See:
- Fowler 1997, p. 1: "probably the oldest religion in the world."
- Klostermaier 2007, p. 1: The "oldest living major religion" in the world.
- Kurien 2006: "There are almost a billion Hindus living on Earth. They practice the world's oldest religion..."
- Bakker 1997: "it [Hinduism] is the oldest religion".
- Noble 1998: "Hinduism, the world's oldest surviving religion, continues to provide the framework for daily life in much of South Asia."
Animism has also been called "the oldest religion."(Sponsel 2012: "Animism is by far the oldest religion in the world. Its antiquity seems to go back at least as far as the period of the Neanderthals some 60,000 to 80,000 years ago.")
Australian linguist, R. M. W. Dixon discovered that Aboriginal myths regarding the origin of the Crater Lakes might be dated as accurate back to 10,000 years ago (Dixon 1996). David et al. (2024) found archaeological evidence that the mulla-mullung ritual, described in the 19th century, dates back at least 12,000 years.
See also:- Urreligion, shamanism, animism, ancestor worship for some of the oldest forms of religion
- Indian tribal religions such as Sarnaism, Sari Dharam, Donyi-Polo and Sanamahism, connected to the earliest migrations into India
- ^ Sanatāna Dharma:
- Harvey 2001, p. xiii: "In modern Indian usage, sanātana dharma is often equated with 'Hinduism' as a name, stressing the eternal foundation of it."
- Knott 1998, p. 5: "Many describe Hinduism as sanatana dharma, the eternal tradition or religion. This refers to the idea that its origins lie beyond human history."
- Knott 1998, p. 117: " The phrase sanatana dharma, eternal tradition, used often by Hindus to describe their religion, implies antiquity, but its usage is modern."
- Parpola 2015, p. 3: "Some Indians object to having a foreign term for their religion, preferring the Sanskrit expression sanātana dharma, "eternal law or truth," despite the fact that this expression was not applied to any religious system in ancient texts."
- ^ a b Lockard 2007, p. 50: "The encounters that resulted from Aryan migration brought together several very different peoples and cultures, reconfiguring Indian society. Over many centuries a fusion of Aryan and Dravidian occurred, a complex process that historians have labeled the Indo-Aryan synthesis."
Lockard 2007, p. 52: "Hinduism can be seen historically as a synthesis of Aryan beliefs with Harappan and other Dravidian traditions that developed over many centuries." - ^ a b Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 12: "A period of consolidation, sometimes identified as one of 'Hindu synthesis', 'Brahmanic synthesis', or 'orthodox synthesis', takes place between the time of the late Vedic Upanishads (c. 500 BCE) and the period of Gupta imperial ascendency (c. 320–467 CE)."
- ^ See:
- Samuel 2008, p. 194: "The Brahmanical pattern"
- Flood 1996, p. 16: "The tradition of brahmanical orthopraxy has played the role of 'master narrative'"
- Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 12: "Brahmanical synthesis"
- ^ a b See also:
- Ghurye 1980, pp. 3–4: "He [J. H. Hutton, the Commissioner of the Census of 1931] considers modern Hinduism to be the result of an amalgam between pre-Aryan Indian beliefs of Mediterranean inspiration and the religion of the Rigveda. 'The Tribal religions present, as it were, surplus material not yet built into the temple of Hinduism'."
- Zimmer 1951, pp. 218–219.
- Sjoberg 1990, p. 43. Quote: [Tyler (1973). India: An Anthropological Perspective. p. 68.]; "The Hindu synthesis was less the dialectical reduction of orthodoxy and heterodoxy than the resurgence of the ancient, aboriginal Indus civilization. In this process the rude, barbaric Aryan tribes were gradually civilised and eventually merged with the autochthonous Dravidians. Although elements of their domestic cult and ritualism were jealously preserved by Brahman priests, the body of their culture survived only in fragmentary tales and allegories embedded in vast, syncretistic compendia. On the whole, the Aryan contribution to Indian culture is insignificant. The essential pattern of Indian culture was already established in the third millennium B.C., and ... the form of Indian civilization perdured and eventually reasserted itself."
- Sjoberg 1990.
- Flood 1996, p. 16: "Contemporary Hinduism cannot be traced to a common origin [...] The many traditions which feed into contemporary Hinduism can be subsumed under three broad headings: the tradition of Brahmanical orthopraxy, the renouncer traditions and popular or local traditions. The tradition of Brahmanical orthopraxy has played the role of 'master narrative', transmitting a body of knowledge and behaviour through time, and defining the conditions of orthopraxy, such as adherence to varnasramadharma."
- Nath 2001.
- Werner 1998.
- Werner 2005, pp. 8–9.
- Lockard 2007, p. 50.
- Hiltebeitel 2002.
- Hopfe & Woodward 2008, p. 79: "The religion that the Aryans brought with them mingled with the religion of the native people, and the culture that developed between them became classical Hinduism."
- Samuel 2010.
- ^ a b Among its roots are the Vedic religion of the late Vedic period (Flood 1996, p. 16) and its emphasis on the status of Brahmans (Samuel 2008, pp. 48–53), but also the religions of the Indus Valley civilisation (Narayanan 2009, p. 11; Lockard 2007, p. 52; Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 3; Jones & Ryan 2007, p. xviii) the śramaṇa or renouncer traditions of northeastern India (Flood 1996, p. 16; Gomez 2013, p. 42), with possible roots in a non-Vedic Indo-Aryan culture (Bronkhorst 2007); and "popular or local traditions" (Flood 1996, p. 16) and prehistoric cultures "that thrived in South Asia long before the creation of textual evidence that we can decipher with any confidence."Doniger 2010, p. 66)
- ^ The Indo-Aryan word Sindhu means "river", "ocean".[35] It is frequently being used in the Rigveda. The Sindhu-area is part of Āryāvarta, "the land of the Aryans".
- ^ In the contemporary era, the term Hindus are individuals who identify with one or more aspects of Hinduism, whether they are practising or non-practising or Laissez-faire.[50] The term does not include those who identify with other Indian religions such as Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism or various animist tribal religions found in India such as Sarnaism.[51] The term Hindu, in contemporary parlance, includes people who accept themselves as culturally or ethnically Hindu rather than with a fixed set of religious beliefs within Hinduism. One need not be religious in the minimal sense, states Julius Lipner, to be accepted as Hindu by Hindus, or to describe oneself as Hindu.[52]
- ^ In D. N. Jha's essay Looking for a Hindu identity, he writes: "No Indians described themselves as Hindus before the fourteenth century" and "Hinduism was a creation of the colonial period and cannot lay claim to any great antiquity."[57] He further wrote "The British borrowed the word 'Hindu' from India, gave it a new meaning and significance, [and] reimported it into India as a reified phenomenon called Hinduism."[58]
- ^ Sweetman mentions:
- Halbfass 1988, India and Europe
- Sontheimer 1989, Hinduism Reconsidered
- Ronald Inden, Imagining India
- Carol Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer, Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament
- Vasudha Dalmia and Heinrich von Stietencron, Representing Hinduism
- S.N. Balagangadhara, The Heathen in his Blindness...
- Thomas Trautmann, Aryans and British India
- King 1999, Orientalism and religion
- ^ See Rajiv Malhotra and Being Different for a critic who gained widespread attention outside the academia, Invading the Sacred, and Hindu studies.
- ^ The term sanatana dharma and its Vedic roots had another context in the colonial era, particularly the early 19th-century through movements such as the Brahmo Samaj and the Arya Samaj. These movements, particularly active in British and French colonies outside India, such as in Africa and the Caribbean, interpreted Hinduism to be a monotheistic religion and attempted to demonstrate that it to be similar to Christianity and Islam. Their views were opposed by other Hindus such as the Sanatan Dharma Sabha of 1895.[105]
- ^ Lipner quotes Brockington (1981), The sacred tread, p. 5.
- ^ Pennington[148] describes the circumstances in which early impressions of Hinduism were reported by colonial era missionaries: "Missionary reports from India also reflected the experience of foreigners in a land whose native inhabitants and British rulers often resented their presence. Their accounts of Hinduism were forged in physically, politically and spiritually hostile surroundings [impoverished, famine-prone Bengal – now West Bengal and Bangladesh]. Plagued with anxieties and fears about their own health, regularly reminded of colleagues who had lost their lives or reason, uncertain of their own social location, and preaching to crowds whose reactions ranged from indifference to amusement to hostility, missionaries found expression for their darker misgivings in their production of what is surely part of their speckled legacy: a fabricated Hinduism crazed by blood-lust and devoted to the service of devils."
- ^ Sweetman (2004, p. 13) identifies several areas in which "there is substantial, if not universal, an agreement that colonialism influenced the study of Hinduism, even if the degree of this influence is debated":
- The wish of European Orientalists "to establish a textual basis for Hinduism", akin to the Protestant culture,(Sweetman 2004, p. 13) which was also driven by preference among the colonial powers for "written authority" rather than "oral authority".(Sweetman 2004, p. 13)
- The influence of Brahmins on European conceptions of Hinduism.(Sweetman 2004, p. 13)
- [T]he identification of Vedanta, more specifically Advaita Vedanta, as 'the paradigmatic example of the mystical nature of the Hindu religion'.(Sweetman 2004, p. 13) (Sweetman cites King 1999, p. 128.) Several factors led to the favouring of Vedanta as the "central philosophy of the Hindus":(Sweetman 2004, pp. 13–14)
- According to Niranjan Dhar's theory that Vedanta was favoured because British feared French influence, especially the impact of the French Revolution; and Ronald Inden's theory that Advaita Vedanta was portrayed as 'illusionist pantheism' reinforcing the colonial stereotypical construction of Hinduism as indifferent to ethics and life-negating.(Sweetman 2004, pp. 13–14)
- "The amenability of Vedantic thought to both Christian and Hindu critics of 'idolatry' in other forms of Hinduism".(Sweetman 2004, p. 14)
- The colonial constructions of caste as being part of Hinduism.(Sweetman 2004, pp. 14–16) According to Nicholas Dirks' theory that, "Caste was refigured as a religious system, organising society in a context where politics and religion had never before been distinct domains of social action. (Sweetman cites Dirks 2001, p. xxvii.)
- "[T]he construction of Hinduism in the image of Christianity"(Sweetman 2004, p. 15)
- Anti-colonial Hindus(Sweetman 2004, pp. 15–16) "looking toward the systematisation of disparate practices as a means of recovering a pre-colonial, national identity".(Sweetman 2004, p. 15) (Sweetman cites Viswanathan 2003, p. 26.)
- ^ Many scholars have presented pre-colonial common denominators and asserted the importance of ancient Hindu textual sources in medieval and pre-colonial times:
- Klaus Witz[151] states that Hindu Bhakti movement ideas in the medieval era grew on the foundation of Upanishadic knowledge and Vedanta philosophies.
- John Henderson[152] states that "Hindus, both in medieval and in modern times, have been particularly drawn to those canonical texts and philosophical schools such as the Bhagavad Gita and Vedanta, which seem to synthesize or reconcile most successfully diverse philosophical teachings and sectarian points of view. Thus, this widely recognised attribute of Indian culture may be traced to the exegetical orientation of medieval Hindu commentarial traditions, especially Vedanta.
- Patrick Olivelle[153] and others[154][155][156] state that the central ideas of the Upanishads in the Vedic corpus are at the spiritual core of Hindus.
- ^ a b * Hinduism is the fastest growing religion in Russia, Ghana and United States. This was due to the influence of the ISKCON and the migration of Hindus in these nations.[177]
- In western nations, the growth of Hinduism has been very fast and is the second fastest growing religion in Europe, after Islam.[178]
- ^ According to Jones & Ryan 2007, p. 474, "The followers of Vaishnavism are many fewer than those of Shaivism, numbering perhaps 200 million."[183][dubious – discuss]
- ^ sometimes with Lakshmi, the spouse of Vishnu; or, as Narayana and Sri;[184]
- ^ Rigveda is not only the oldest among the Vedas, but is one of the earliest Indo-European texts.
- ^ According to Bhavishya Purana, Brahmaparva, Adhyaya 7, there are four sources of dharma: Śruti (Vedas), Smṛti (Dharmaśāstras, Puranas), Śiṣṭa Āchāra/Sadāchara (conduct of noble people) and finally Ātma tuṣṭi (Self satisfaction). From the sloka:
- वेदः स्मृतिः सदाचारः स्वस्य च प्रियमात्मनः । एतच्चतुर्विधं प्राहुः साक्षाद्धर्मस्य लक्षणम् ॥[web 10]
- vedaḥ smṛtiḥ sadācāraḥ svasya ca priyamātmanah
etaccaturvidham prāhuḥ sākshāddharmasya lakshaṇam - – Bhavishya Purāṇa, Brahmaparva, Adhyāya 7
- ^ For translation of deva in singular noun form as "a deity, god", and in plural form as "the gods" or "the heavenly or shining ones", see: Monier-Williams 2001, p. 492. For translation of devatā as "godhead, divinity", see: Monier-Williams 2001, p. 495.
- ^ Among some regional Hindus, such as Rajputs, these are called Kuldevis or Kuldevata.[319]
- ^ Klostermaier: "Brahman, derived from the root bŗh = to grow, to become great, was originally identical with the Vedic word, that makes people prosper: words were the pricipan means to approach the gods who dwelled in a different sphere. It was not a big step from this notion of "reified speech-act" to that "of the speech-act being looked at implicitly and explicitly as a means to an end." Klostermaier 2007, p. 55 quotes Madhav M. Deshpande (1990), Changing Conceptions of the Veda: From Speech-Acts to Magical Sounds, p.4.
- ^ The cremation ashes are called phool (flowers). These are collected from the pyre in a rite-of-passage called asthi sanchayana, then dispersed during asthi visarjana. This signifies redemption of the dead in waters considered to be sacred and a closure for the living. Tirtha locations offer these services.[414][415]
- ^ Venkataraman and Deshpande: "Caste-based discrimination does exist in many parts of India today.... Caste-based discrimination fundamentally contradicts the essential teaching of Hindu sacred texts that divinity is inherent in all beings."[web 19]
- ^ Among its roots are the Vedic religion[125] of the late Vedic period and its emphasis on the status of Brahmans,[512] but also the religions of the Indus Valley Civilisation,[63][513][26] the śramaṇa[514] or renouncer traditions[125] of east India,[514] and "popular or local traditions".[125]
- ^ There is no exact dating possible for the beginning of the Vedic period. Witzel mentions a range between 1900 and 1400 BCE.[516] Flood mentions 1500 BCE.[517]
- ^ According to Sharma, the concept of missionary conversion, either way, is anathema to the precepts of Hinduism.[536]
- ^ Réunion is not a country, but an overseas department and region of France.
- ^ a b Smith (1963, pp. 65–66): "My point, and I think that this is the first step that one must take towards understanding something of the vision of Hindus, is that the mass of religious phenomena that we shelter under the umbrella of that term, is not a unity and does not aspire to be." Brodd et al. (2018, p. 92): "Hinduism has neither a single founder nor a single sacred book. There is no single historical event that marks its birth. The history of Hinduism embodies both continuity and change. Having never had a sole central authority, Hinduism's fluid character has always allowed it to adapt to a variety of social and cultural contexts. This diversity has led many scholars to argue that Hinduism is not one religion at all but a constellation of many religious sects that share some common aspects. Others see enough by way of common beliefs and practices to regard Hinduism as a single religious tradition."
- ^ a b There is no single-word translation for dharma in Western languages (Widgery 1930, Rocher 2003). The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions, Dharma, defines dharma as follows: "the order and custom which make life and a universe possible, and thus to the behaviours appropriate to the maintenance of that order." See Dharma (righteousness, ethics).
'Hindu dharma' refers to the religious behaviours and attitudes of the various traditions collectively referred to as Hinduism:- Flood (2003a, p. 9): "V. D. Savarkar [...] in his highly influential book Hindutva: Who is a Hindu? (1923) distinguishes between “Hindu Dharma,” the various traditions subsumed under the term “Hinduism,” and “Hindutva” or “Hinduness,” a sociopolitical force to unite all Hindus against “threatening Others”
- Thomas (2012, p. 175): "Some 'Hindus' refer to this agglomeration of religious forms as 'Hindu dharma' (dharma here standing loosely for' religion'), but that is only to enable them to communicate to westerners some of their own religious attitudes."
- Bhattacharya (2006, p. 1): "Dharma, therefore, is just not a belief but righteous living."
- ^ Flood (2003a, p. 4): "This revelation of the Veda[s], verses believed to have been revealed to and heard by (sruti) the ancient sages (rsi), as symbol and legitimizing reference if not actual text, is central as a constraining influence on later traditions, providing the authority for tradition (Oberhammer 1997: 21–31). Some would argue that this is a defining feature of Hinduism.
References
[edit]- ^ "Hinduism". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 19 April 2021.
- ^ Lochtefeld 2002a.
- ^ Flood 2022, p. 339.
- ^ Holberg (2000), p. 316; Nicholson (2013), pp. 2–5; McDaniel (2007), pp. 52–53; Michaels (2004), p. 21.
- ^ Flood (2003a), p. 9; Thomas (2012), p. 175; Bhattacharya (2006).
- ^ Wimberley (2009), p. 99; Klostermaier (1989), p. 16; Chung (2022), p. 183; Lipner (1998), p. 2.
- ^ Olivelle (2009), p. 489; Sharma (2011), p. 124; Varghese (2008), p. 743; Monier-Williams (1891), p. 20; Raju (1989), p. 147.
- ^ a b c Michaels 2004.
- ^ a b Klostermaier 2007, pp. 46–52, 76–77.
- ^ Zaehner 1992, pp. 1–7.
- ^ a b c Brodd 2003.
- ^ Bilimoria, Prabhu & Sharma 2007.
- ^ a b Koller 1968.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 7.
- ^ a b Ellinger, Herbert (1996). Hinduism. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 69–70. ISBN 978-1-56338-161-4. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
- ^ a b Werner 2005, pp. 13, 45.
- ^ a b c Flood 1996, pp. 113, 134, 155–161, 167–168.
- ^ a b c Lipner 2009, pp. 377, 398.
- ^ a b Holberg 2000, p. 316.
- ^ a b Nicholson 2013, p. 2–5.
- ^ a b Fowler 1997, pp. 1, 7.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 12.
- ^ a b c d e Larson 2009.
- ^ a b Larson 1995, pp. 109–111.
- ^ "What Is ISKCON » Home - ISKCON - The Hare Krishna Movement". www.iskcon.org. Retrieved 5 October 2025.
- ^ a b Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 3.
- ^ a b Gonda 1975; Bakker 1997; Howe 2001; Stuart-Fox 2002.
- ^ Vertovec, Steven (2013). The Hindu Diaspora: Comparative Patterns. Routledge. pp. 1–4, 7–8, 63–64, 87–88, 141–143. ISBN 978-1-136-36705-2. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 18 July 2017.
- ^ "Hindus". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. 18 December 2012. Archived from the original on 9 February 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
- ^ "Table: Religious Composition by Country, in Numbers (2010)". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. 18 December 2012. Archived from the original on 1 February 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
- ^ Siemens & Roodt 2009, p. 546; Leaf 2014, p. 36
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 6; Parpola 2015, "Chapter 1"
- ^ Singh 2008, p. 433; Flood 1996, p. 6
- ^ Eggermont, Pierre Herman Leonard (1975). Alexander's Campaigns in Sind and Baluchistan and the Siege of the Brahmin Town of Harmatelia. Peeters Publishers. p. 145. ISBN 978-90-6186-037-2. Archived from the original on 23 November 2022. Retrieved 25 December 2024.
Sindhu means a stream, a river, and in particular the Indus river, but likewise it denotes the territory of the lower Indus valley, or modern Sind... It denotes a geographical unit to which different tribes may belong.
- ^ Flood 2003, p. 3.
- ^ Parpola (2015), "Chapter 9": "In Iranian languages, Proto-Iranian *s became h before a following vowel at a relatively late period, perhaps around 850–600 BCE."
- ^ a b Thapar, Romila (2004). Early India: From the Origins to A.D. 1300. University of California Press. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-520-24225-8.
- ^ a b c Sharma 2002.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 6: "The actual term Hindu first occurs as a Persian geographical term for the people who lived beyond the river Indus (Sanskrit: Sindhu).".
- ^ a b c Flood 1996, p. 6.
- ^ Thapar 2004, p. 38: "...in Arab sources, al-Hind (the land beyond the Indus)."
- ^ Thapar 1989, p. 222: "Al-Hind was therefore a geographical identity and the Hindus were all the people who lived on this land." Thapar 1993, p. 77
- ^ Thompson Platts 1884.
- ^ Truschke 2023, pp. 251–252.
- ^ Truschke 2023, pp. 253–254.
- ^ a b O'Conell, Joseph T. (1973). "The Word 'Hindu' in Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava Texts". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 93 (3): 340–344. doi:10.2307/599467. ISSN 0003-0279. JSTOR 599467.
- ^ Truschke 2023, p. 252: "Christine Chojnacki has argued that hinduka and related terms mark a combination of religious, linguistic, and cultural affinities in early Jain sources." Truschke 2023, p. 253: "Writing for the Bahmani court in the Deccan in 1350, Isami paired hindū and musalmān, elsewhere using hindī to mean Indian." Truschke 2023, p. 254: "[Vidyapati] equates Hindu and Muslim religious and cultural practices, positing comparable differences between their respective dhamme (Sanskrit dharma)." Truschke 2023, p. 260: "Most passages identified a mix of religious and cultural norms. For instance, the texts refer to the “Hindu god” (hindura īśvara) and “Hindu treatise” (hindu-śāstre), on the one hand, and to “hindu clothes” (hindu-beśa), on the other."
- ^ Truschke 2023, pp. 254.
- ^ a b Truschke 2023, p. 261.
- ^ Turner, Bryan (2010). The New Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Religion. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 424–425. ISBN 978-1-4051-8852-4.
- ^ Minahan, James (2012). Ethnic Groups of South Asia and the Pacific: An Encyclopedia. Abc-Clio. pp. 97–99. ISBN 978-1-59884-659-1.
- ^ Lipner 2009, p. 8.
- ^ Truschke 2023, pp. 261–262.
- ^ Truschke 2023, p. 262; Singh 2008, p. 433
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 6; Klostermaier 2010, p. 17; Doniger 2014, p. 5; Parpola 2015, p. 5
- ^ a b Doniger 2014, p. 3.
- ^ Dube, Mukul (10 January 2016). "A short note on the short history of Hinduism". Scroll.in. Archived from the original on 28 November 2022.
- ^ "Short note on the short history of Hinduism". 10 January 2016. Archived from the original on 13 November 2021. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
- ^ Lochtefeld 2002a; Flood 2022, p. 339
- ^ Holberg 2000, p. 316; Nicholson 2013, pp. 2–5; McDaniel 2007, pp. 52–53; Michaels 2004, p. 21
- ^ Samuel 2008, p. 193.
- ^ Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 12; Flood 1996, p. 16; Lockard 2007, p. 50
- ^ a b c Narayanan 2009, p. 11.
- ^ Turner 1996a, p. 275.
- ^ a b Lipner 2009, p. 8 Quote: "[...] one need not be religious in the minimal sense described to be accepted as a Hindu by Hindus, or describe oneself perfectly validly as Hindu. One may be polytheistic or monotheistic, monistic or pantheistic, henotheistic, panentheistic, pandeistic, even an agnostic, humanist or atheist, and still be considered a Hindu."
- ^ Kurtz, Lester, ed. (2008). Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-369503-1.
- ^ MK Gandhi, The Essence of Hinduism Archived 24 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Editor: VB Kher, Navajivan Publishing, see page 3
- ^ Knott 1998, p. 117.
- ^ Sharma 2003, pp. 12–13.
- ^ Flood 2003a, p. 9.
- ^ Thomas 2012, p. 175.
- ^ Bhattacharya 2006.
- ^ a b Sweetman 2004.
- ^ a b c d King 1999.
- ^ Nussbaum 2009.
- ^ Clarke 2011, p. 28.
- ^ a b Bhandarkar 1913.
- ^ a b Tattwananda n.d.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 14.
- ^ a b McDaniel 2007, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 21.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 22.
- ^ a b Michaels 2004, p. 23.
- ^ a b c Michaels 2004, p. 24.
- ^ "Definition of RAMAISM". www.merriam-webster.com. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
- ^ Michaels 2004, pp. 21–22.
- ^ Michaels 2004, pp. 22–23.
- ^ a b c d Ronald Inden (2001), Imagining India, Indiana University Press, ISBN 978-0-253-21358-7, pp. 117–122, 127–130
- ^ Ferro-Luzzi (1991). "The Polythetic-Prototype Approach to Hinduism". In Sontheimer, G.D.; Kulke, H. (eds.). Hinduism Reconsidered. Delhi: Manohar. pp. 187–195.
- ^ Valmiki Ramayana, Ayodhya kanda, sarga 6, sloka 1, 2 and 3
- ^ "Srirangam temple rich with elaborate details". The Hindu. 3 April 2014. Archived from the original on 16 August 2023. Retrieved 28 August 2023 – via www.thehindu.com.
- ^ "Was Ram born in Ayodhya?". Mumbai Mirror. Archived from the original on 14 August 2020. Retrieved 28 August 2023.
- ^ Insoll, Timothy (2001). Archaeology and world religion. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-22155-9. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Bowker 2000; Harvey 2001, p. xiii
- ^ Vivekjivandas 2010, p. 1.
- ^ Knott 1998, p. 111.
- ^ Hacker, Paul (2006). "Dharma in Hinduism". Journal of Indian Philosophy. 34 (5): 479–496. doi:10.1007/s10781-006-9002-4. S2CID 170922678.
- ^ Knott 1998, pp. 3, 5, 117.
- ^ Bowker 2000.
- ^ Harvey 2001, p. xiii.
- ^ Parpola 2015, p. 3.
- ^ a b Hatcher 2015, pp. 4–5, 69–71, 150–152.
- ^ Knott 1998, p. 3.
- ^ a b c d e Lipner 2009, pp. 15–17.
- ^ Taylor, Patrick; Case, Frederick I. (2013). The Encyclopedia of Caribbean Religions: Volume 1: A – L; Volume 2: M – Z. University of Illinois Press. pp. 902–903. ISBN 978-0-252-09433-0. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 25 July 2018.
- ^ Sharma & Sharma 2004, pp. 1–2.
- ^ Klostermaier 2014, p. 2.
- ^ Klostermaier 2007b, p. 7.
- ^ Sharma, A (1985). "Did the Hindus have a name for their own religion?". The Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia. 17 (1): 94–98 [95]. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ Smith 1998.
- ^ Valpey, Kenneth Russell; Gupta, Ravi Mohan (2013). The Bhāgavata Purāṇa, sacred text and living tradition, p. 146. Columbia University Press.
- ^ Lipner 2009, p. 16.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 18; see also Lipner 2009, p. 77; and Smith, Brian K. (2008). "Hinduism". In Neusner, Jacob (ed.). Sacred Texts and Authority. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 101.
- ^ a b Kohli Hari Dev (2010), Supreme Court On Hindu Law, p.251
- ^ a b Ved P. Nanda (ed.)(2016), Compassion in the 4 Dharmic Traditions, p.71
- ^ Peter Beyer, Religions in Global Society
- ^ Doniger 2014, p. 20.
- ^ Dasgupta, Surendranath; Banarsidass, Motilall (1992). A history of Indian philosophy (part 1). p. 70.
- ^ Chande, M.B. (2000). Indian Philosophy in Modern Times. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. p. 277.
- ^ Culp, John (2008). "Panentheism". In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Halbfass 1991, pp. 1–22.
- ^ Klostermaier 1994, p. 1.
- ^ Flood 1996, pp. 1, 7.
- ^ Lockard 2007, p. 50; Hiltebeitel 2002, p. 12
- ^ a b c d e Flood 1996, p. 16.
- ^ Quack, Johannes; Binder, Stefan (22 February 2018). "Atheism and Rationalism in Hinduism". Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0196.
- ^ a b c d Halbfass 1991, p. 15.
- ^ a b c Nicholson 2010.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 35.
- ^ a b Pinkney, Andrea (2014). Turner, Bryan; Salemink, Oscar (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Religions in Asia. Routledge. pp. 31–32. ISBN 978-0-415-63503-5.
- ^ Haines, Jeffrey (2008). Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics. Routledge. p. 80. ISBN 978-0-415-60029-3.
- ^ Halbfass 1991, p. 1.
- ^ Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, pp. 99–100.
- ^ Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, pp. 100–101.
- ^ Deutsch & Dalvi 2004, p. 101.
- ^ Nicholson 2010, p. 2; Lorenzen 2006, pp. 1–36
- ^ Lorenzen 2006, p. 36.
- ^ a b Lorenzen 1999, p. 648.
- ^ Lorenzen 1999, pp. 648, 655.
- ^ Nicholson 2010, p. 2.
- ^ Burley 2007, p. 34.
- ^ Lorenzen 2006, pp. 24–33.
- ^ Lorenzen 2006, p. 27.
- ^ Lorenzen 2006, pp. 26–27.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 44.
- ^ a b King 1999, pp. 100–102.
- ^ Sweetman 2004, pp. 14–15.
- ^ Pennington 2005, pp. 76–77.
- ^ King 1999, p. 169.
- ^ a b Pennington 2005, pp. 4–5 and Chapter 6.
- ^ Witz, Klaus G (1998). The Supreme Wisdom of the Upaniṣads: An Introduction, Motilal Banarsidass. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. pp. 10–11. ISBN 978-81-208-1573-5.
- ^ Henderson, John (2014). Scripture, Canon and Commentary. Princeton University Press. p. 120. ISBN 978-0-691-60172-4.
- ^ a b Olivelle, Patrick (2014). The Early Upanisads. Oxford University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-19-535242-9.
Even though theoretically the whole of Vedic corpus is accepted as revealed truth [shruti], in reality it is the Upanishads that have continued to influence the life and thought of the various religious traditions that we have come to call Hindu. Upanishads are the scriptures par excellence of Hinduism.
- ^ Doniger 1990, pp. 2–3: "The Upanishads supply the basis of later Hindu philosophy; they alone of the Vedic corpus are widely known and quoted by most well-educated Hindus, and their central ideas have also become a part of the spiritual arsenal of rank-and-file Hindus."
- ^ a b McDowell, Michael; Brown, Nathan (2009). World Religions. Penguin. pp. 208–210. ISBN 978-1-59257-846-7.
- ^ Dissanayake, Wiman (1993). Kasulis, Thomas P.; et al. (eds.). Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-7914-1080-6.
- ^ Feuerstein 2002, p. 600.
- ^ Clarke 2006, p. 209.
- ^ Hackel in Nicholson 2010.
- ^ King 2001.
- ^ a b Lorenzen 2002, p. 33.
- ^ a b c d Flood 1996, p. 258.
- ^ Flood 1996, pp. 256–261.
- ^ Young, Serinity (2007). Hinduism. Marshall Cavendish. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-7614-2116-0. Retrieved 19 February 2015.
Rammohun Roy Father of Hindu Renaissance.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 257.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 259.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 249.
- ^ a b c d e Flood 1996, p. 265.
- ^ a b c Flood 1996, p. 267.
- ^ Flood 1996, pp. 267–268.
- ^ Hansen, Thomas Blom (1999). The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton University Press. p. 77. ISBN 978-1-4008-2305-5. Archived from the original on 16 January 2024. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
- ^ Anderson, Edward; Longkumer, Arkotong (2 October 2018). "'Neo-Hindutva': evolving forms, spaces, and expressions of Hindu nationalism". Contemporary South Asia. 26 (4): 371–377. doi:10.1080/09584935.2018.1548576. hdl:20.500.11820/8da58c02-ac36-46f1-a4f6-71ad6be1be09. ISSN 0958-4935.
- ^ Chacko, Priya (2019c). "Marketizing Hindutva: The state, society, and markets in Hindu nationalism". Modern Asian Studies. 53 (2): 377–410. doi:10.1017/S0026749X17000051. hdl:2440/117274. ISSN 0026-749X. S2CID 149588748. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
- ^ "As Nepal Strives to Become More Inclusive, Are Muslims Being Left Behind?". www.worldpoliticsreview.com. 30 January 2018. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
- ^ Hatcher 2015, p. 239.
- ^ Berg, Travis Vande; Kniss, Fred (2008). "ISKCON and Immigrants: The Rise, Decline, and Rise Again of a New Religious Movement". The Sociological Quarterly. 49 (1): 79–104. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00107.x. ISSN 0038-0253. JSTOR 40220058. S2CID 146169730.
- ^ "How ISKCON took Hinduism to the US heartland". scroll.in. 17 January 2015. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
- ^ "Hinduism in Europe" (PDF). Microsoft Word. 28 April 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 May 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
- ^ a b c d SS Kumar (2010), Bhakti – the Yoga of Love, LIT Verlag Münster, ISBN 978-3-643-50130-1, pp. 35–36
- ^ Lipner 2009, pp. 371–375.
- ^ The global religious landscape: Hindus Archived 9 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Pew Research (2012)
- ^ a b Preston, Charles. "List of religious populations | Largest Religions, Smallest Religions, Lists, Data, & Overview | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Archived from the original on 14 January 2025. Retrieved 1 February 2025.
- ^ a b Jones & Ryan 2007, p. 474.
- ^ Beck 2005, p. 65 and Chapter 5.
- ^ Bryant & Ekstrand 2004, pp. 15–17.
- ^ a b Bryant & Ekstrand 2004, pp. 38–43.
- ^ Nettl, Bruno; Stone, Ruth M.; Porter, James; Rice, Timothy (1998). The Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia: the Indian subcontinent. Routledge. pp. 246–247. ISBN 978-0-8240-4946-1. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2016.
- ^ (Espín & Nickoloff 2007, pp. 1441, 376)
- ^ a b c d (Espín & Nickoloff 2007, pp. 562–563)
- ^ Dalal 2010, p. 209.
- ^ James Lochtefeld (2010), God's Gateway: Identity and Meaning in a Hindu Pilgrimage Place, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-538614-1
- ^ Isaeva 1995, pp. 141–145.
- ^ Scaligero, Massimo (1955). "The Tantra and the Spirit of the West". East and West. 5 (4): 291–296. JSTOR 29753633.
- ^ History: Hans Koester (1929), The Indian Religion of the Goddess Shakti, Journal of the Siam Society, Vol 23, Part 1, pp. 1–18;
Modern practices: June McDaniel (2010), Goddesses in World Culture, Volume 1 (Editor: Patricia Monaghan), ISBN 978-0-313-35465-6, Chapter 2 - ^ Flood 1996, p. 113.
- ^ Hiltebeitel 2002.
- ^ Flood 1996.
- ^ Wainwright, William (2012). "Concepts of God". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Archived from the original on 23 March 2015. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
- ^ Murthy, U (1979). Samskara. Oxford University Press. p. 150. ISBN 978-0-19-561079-6.
- ^ Williamson, L (2010). Transcendent in America: Hindu-inspired Meditation Movements as New Religion. New York University Press. p. 89. ISBN 978-0-8147-9450-0.
- ^ Milner, Murray (1994). Status and Sacredness. Oxford University Press. pp. 194–197. ISBN 978-0-19-508489-4.
- ^ West 2010.
- ^ Singh 2004.
- ^ Cœdès 1968; Pande 2006; Acri, Creese & Griffiths 2011.
- ^ "The spread of Hinduism in Southeast Asia and the Pacific". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Archived from the original on 16 January 2020. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
- ^ a b Hefner 1989; Kinney, Klokke & Kieven 2003.
- ^ Phuong & Lockhart 2011; Pande 2006, p. 231.
- ^ Haider, Suhasini (3 February 2018). "Tattooed 'blue-skinned' Hindu Pushtuns look back at their roots". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 22 August 2021. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
- ^ Michael 2004.
- ^ Rajesh Joshi. "Ghana's unique African-Hindu temple". BBC News. Archived from the original on 31 December 2021.
- ^ Carney 2020.
- ^ Muesse 2011, p. 202.
- ^ Flood 2003, pp. 68–69, See Michael Witzel quote.
- ^ Sargeant & Chapple 1984, p. 3.
- ^ Rinehart 2004, p. 68.
- ^ Flood 2003, p. 4.
- ^ Flood 1996, pp. 35–39.
- ^ Bhattacharya 2006, pp. 8–14.
- ^ George M. Williams (2003), Handbook of Hindu Mythology, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-533261-2, p. 285
- ^ Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-447-01603-2
- ^ Roer 1908, pp. 1–5; "The Vedas are divided in two parts, the first is the karma-kanda, the ceremonial part, also (called) pūrva-kāṇḍa, and treats on ceremonies; the second part is the jñāna-kāṇḍa, the part which contains knowledge, also named uttarra-kāṇḍa or posterior part and unfolds the knowledge of Brahma or the universal Self."
- ^ Werner 2005, pp. 10, 58, 66.
- ^ Monier-Williams 1974, pp. 25–41.
- ^ a b Olivelle, Patrick (1998). "Introduction". Upaniṣads. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-282292-5.
- ^ a b Doniger 1990, pp. 2–3: "The Upanishads supply the basis of later Hindu philosophy; they alone of the Vedic corpus are widely known and quoted by most well-educated Hindus, and their central ideas have also become a part of the spiritual arsenal of rank-and-file Hindus."
- ^ Dissanayake, Wiman (1993). Kasulis, Thomas P.; et al. (eds.). Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-7914-1080-6.
The Upanishads form the foundations of Hindu philosophical thought and the central theme of the Upanishads is the identity of Atman and Brahman, or the inner self and the cosmic self
- ^ Radhakrishnan, S. (1969) [1953]. The Principal Upanishads (reprint ed.). George Allen & Co. pp. 17–19. ISBN 978-81-7223-124-8.
- ^ Thirteen Principal Upanishads. Translated by Hume, Robert. Oxford University Press. 1921.
- ^ Sarvopaniṣado gāvo, etc. (Gītā Māhātmya 6). Gītā Dhyānam, cited in "Introduction". Bhagavad-gītā [As It Is]. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020 – via Bhaktivedanta VedaBase.
- ^ Coburn, Thomas B. (September 1984). ""Scripture" in India: Towards a Typology of the Word in Hindu Life". Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 52 (3): 435–459. doi:10.1093/jaarel/52.3.435.
- ^ Lorenzen 1999, p. 655.
- ^ Michelis, Elizabeth De (2005). A History of Modern Yoga: Patanjali and Western Esotericism. Continuum. ISBN 978-0-8264-8772-8. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 14 October 2017.
- ^ Vivekananda 1987, pp. 6–7, Volume I.
- ^ Harshananda 1989.
- ^ Balfour, Edward (1885). The Cyclopædia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia: Commercial, Industrial and Scientific, Products of the Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal Kingdoms, Useful Arts and Manufactures. B. Quaritch. p. 60. Archived from the original on 20 March 2023. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
- ^ a b Jones & Ryan 2007, p. 13.
- ^ Dhavamony, Mariasusai (1999). Hindu Spirituality. Gregorian University and Biblical Press. pp. 31–34. ISBN 978-88-7652-818-7.
- ^ Smith, David (1996). The Dance of Siva: Religion, Art and Poetry in South India. Cambridge University Press. p. 116. ISBN 978-0-521-48234-9.
- ^ A.M. Boyer: Etude sur l'origine de la doctrine du samsara. Journal Asiatique, (1901), Volume 9, Issue 18, S. 451–453, 459–468
- ^ Yuvraj Krishan: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1997, ISBN 978-81-208-1233-8
- ^ Laumakis, Stephen J. (2008). An Introduction to Buddhist Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-46966-1. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
- ^ Hayakawa, Atsushi (2014). Circulation of Fire in the Veda. LIT Verlag Münster. ISBN 978-3-643-90472-0.
- ^ Sayers, Matthew R. (2013). Feeding the Dead: Ancestor Worship in Ancient India. OUP USA. ISBN 978-0-19-989643-1. Archived from the original on 30 December 2023. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
- ^ Sayers, Matthew R. (May 2008). Feeding the ancestors: ancestor worship in ancient Hinduism and Buddhism (Thesis thesis). Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
- ^ Sayers, Matthew R. (June 2015). "The Śrāddha : The Development of Ancestor Worship in Classical Hinduism: The Śrāddha". Religion Compass. 9 (6): 182–197. doi:10.1111/rec3.12155. Archived from the original on 19 January 2022. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
- ^ Bilimoria, Prabhu & Sharma 2007; see also Koller 1968.
- ^ Flood 1997, p. 11.
- ^ Flood, Gavin (1996a). "The meaning and context of the Purusarthas". In Lipner, Julius (ed.). The Fruits of Our Desiring. Bayeux. pp. 16–21. ISBN 978-1-896209-30-2.
- ^ "Dharma" Archived 26 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions: "In Hinduism, dharma is a fundamental concept, referring to the order and custom which make life and a universe possible, and thus to the behaviours appropriate to the maintenance of that order."
- ^ a b "Dharma". The Columbia Encyclopedia (6th ed.). Columbia University Press. 2013. ISBN 978-0-7876-5015-5.
- ^ a b Van Buitenen, J. A. B. (April–July 1957). "Dharma and Moksa". Philosophy East and West. 7 (1/2): 33–40. doi:10.2307/1396832. JSTOR 1396832.
- ^ Charles Johnston, The Mukhya Upanishads: Books of Hidden Wisdom, Kshetra, ISBN 978-1-4959-4653-0, p. 481, for discussion: pp. 478–505
- ^ Paul Horsch (Translated by Jarrod Whitaker), "From Creation Myth to World Law: The early history of Dharma", Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol 32, pp. 423–448, (2004)
- ^ Swami Prabhupādā, A. C. Bhaktivedanta (1986). Bhagavad-gītā as it is. The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-89213-268-3. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Lochtefeld 2002a, pp. 55–56.
- ^ Bruce Sullivan (1997), Historical Dictionary of Hinduism, ISBN 978-0-8108-3327-2, pp. 29–30
- ^ John Koller, Puruṣārtha as Human Aims, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Oct. 1968), pp. 315–319
- ^ Macy, Joanna (1975). "The Dialectics of Desire". Numen. 22 (2): 145–160. doi:10.2307/3269765. JSTOR 3269765.
- ^ Monier Williams, काम, kāma Archived 19 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine Monier-Williams Sanskrit English Dictionary, p. 271, see 3rd column
- ^ R. Prasad (2008), History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization, Volume 12, Part 1, ISBN 978-8180695445, Chapter 10, particularly pp. 252–255
- ^ See:
- "The Hindu Kama Shastra Society" (1925), The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana, University of Toronto Archives, pp. 8;
- A. Sharma (1982), The Puruṣārthas: a study in Hindu axiology, Michigan State University, ISBN 978-99936-24-31-8, pp. 9–12; See review by Frank Whaling in Numen, Vol. 31, 1 (July 1984), pp. 140–142;
- A. Sharma (1999), "The Puruṣārthas: An Axiological Exploration of Hinduism" Archived 29 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, The Journal of Religious Ethics, Vol. 27, No. 2 (Summer, 1999), pp. 223–256;
- Chris Bartley (2001), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, Editor: Oliver Learman, ISBN 978-0-415-17281-3, Routledge, Article on Purushartha, p. 443
- ^ Rinehart 2004, pp. 19–21.
- ^ Long, J. Bruce (1980). "2 Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions". In O'Flaherty, Wendy D. (ed.). The concepts of human action and rebirth in the Mahabharata. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-03923-0.
- ^ The Far East and Australasia, 2003 – Regional surveys of the world. Routledge. 2003. p. 39. ISBN 978-1-85743-133-9. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Hindu spirituality – Volume 25 of Documenta missionalia. Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana. 1999. p. 1. ISBN 978-88-7652-818-7. Archived from the original on 29 December 2019. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ a b c Potter, Karl H. (1958). "Dharma and Mokṣa from a Conversational Point of View". Philosophy East and West. 8 (1/2): 49–63. doi:10.2307/1397421. ISSN 0031-8221. JSTOR 1397421.
- ^ a b c d e Klostermaier, Klaus (1985). Philosophy East & West. University Press of Hawaii. pp. 61–71. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
- ^ a b Deutsch 2001.
- ^ Ingalls, Daniel H. H. (1957d). "Dharma and Moksha" (PDF). Philosophy East and West. 7 (2): 41–48. doi:10.2307/1396833. JSTOR 1396833.[permanent dead link]
- ^ a b Pal, Jagat (2004). Karma, Dharma and Moksha: Conceptual Essays on Indian Ethics. Abhijeet Publications. ISBN 978-81-88683-23-9. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
- ^ von Brück, M. (1986). "Imitation or Identification?". Indian Theological Studies. 23 (2): 95–105.
- ^ Fort, Andrew O. (1998). Jivanmukti in Transformation: Embodied Liberation in Advaita and Neo-Vedanta. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-3904-3. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
- ^ Apte, Vaman S (1997). The Student's English-Sanskrit Dictionary (New ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas. ISBN 978-81-208-0300-8.
- ^ Smith, Huston (1991). The World's Religions: Our Great Wisdom Traditions. San Francisco: Harper. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-06-250799-0.
- ^ Karl Potter (1964), "The Naturalistic Principle of Karma", Philosophy East and West, Vol. 14, No. 1 (April 1964), pp. 39–49
- ^ a b Wendy D. O'Flaherty (1980), Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-03923-0, pp. xi–xxv (Introduction) and 3–37
- ^ Karl Potter (1980), in Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions (O'Flaherty, Editor), University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-03923-0, pp. 241–267
- ^ Radhakrishnan 1996, p. 254.
- ^ Vivekananda, Swami (2005). Jnana Yoga. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 301–302. ISBN 978-1-4254-8288-6. (8th Printing 1993)
- ^ Chapple, Christopher Key (1986). Karma and Creativity. SUNY Press. pp. 60–64. ISBN 978-0-88706-250-6. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
- ^ Boyer, A. M. (1901). "Etude sur l'origine de la doctrine du samsara". Journal Asiatique. 9 (18): 451–453, 459–468.
- ^ Krishan, Yuvraj (1997). Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. ISBN 978-81-208-1233-8.
- ^ Laumakis 2008, pp. 90–99.
- ^ Ranade, R. D. (1926). A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. pp. 147–148.
... in certain other places [of Rigveda], an approach is being made to the idea of Transmigration. ... There we definitely know that the whole hymn is address to a departed spirit, and the poet [of the Rigvedic hymn] says that he is going to recall the departed soul in order that it may return again and live.
- ^ Sayers, Matthew R. (2013). Feeding the Dead: Ancestor worship in ancient India. Oxford University Press. pp. 1–9. ISBN 978-0-19-989643-1. Archived from the original on 30 December 2023. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
- ^ Sayers, Matthew Rae. Feeding the ancestors: ancestor worship in ancient Hinduism and Buddhism (PhD thesis). University of Texas. p. 12. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
- ^ Sayers, Matthew R. (1 November 2015). McGovern, Nathan (ed.). "Feeding the Dead: Ancestor worship in ancient India". The Journal of Hindu Studies. 8 (3): 336–338. doi:10.1093/jhs/hiv034. ISSN 1756-4255. Archived from the original on 4 February 2021. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
- ^ Keown, Damien (2013). Buddhism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. pp. 28, 32–38. ISBN 978-0-19-966383-5. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
- ^ Laumakis 2008.
- ^ Chakravarti, Sitansu (1991). Hinduism, a way of life. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 71. ISBN 978-81-208-0899-7. Archived from the original on 13 April 2017. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. xiv.
- ^ Gill, N.S. "Henotheism". About.com Education. About, Inc. Archived from the original on 17 March 2007. Retrieved 5 July 2007.
- ^ Kramer 1986, pp. 34–.
- ^ Christian 2011, pp. 18–.
- ^ Singh 2008, pp. 206–.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 226.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 226; Kramer 1986, pp. 20–21
- ^ * Original Sanskrit: Rigveda 10.129 Archived 25 May 2017 at the Wayback Machine Wikisource;
- Translation 1: Muller 1859, pp. 559–565
- Translation 2: Kramer 1986, p. 21
- Translation 3: Christian 2011, pp. 17–18
- ^ Muller, Max (1878). Lectures on the Origins and Growth of Religions: As Illustrated by the Religions of India. Longmans Green & Co. pp. 260–271.
Wilkins, William Joseph (1882). Hindu Mythology: Vedic and Purānic. Calcutta: London Missionary Society. p. 8. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 19 October 2020. - ^ Raghavendrachar, H.N. (1944). "Monism in the Vedas" (PDF). Section A – Arts. The Half-yearly Journal of the Mysore University. 4 (2): 137–152. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 February 2015.
Werner, K. (1982). "Men, gods and powers in the Vedic outlook". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. 114 (1): 14–24. doi:10.1017/S0035869X00158575. S2CID 163754819.
Coward, H. (1995). "The Limits of Scripture: Vivekananda's Reinterpretation of the Vedas". Book Review. Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies. 8 (1): 45–47. doi:10.7825/2164-6279.1116.There is little doubt that the theo-monistic category is an appropriate one for viewing a wide variety of experiences in the Hindu tradition
- ^ Monier-Williams 1974, pp. 20–37.
- ^ Bhaskarananda 1994
- ^ Vivekananda 1987.
- ^ John Koller (2012), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Editors: Chad Meister, Paul Copan), Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-78294-4, pp. 99–107
- ^ Lance Nelson (1996), "Living liberation in Shankara and classical Advaita", in Living Liberation in Hindu Thought (Editors: Andrew O. Fort, Patricia Y. Mumme), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2706-4, pp. 38–39, 59 (footnote 105)
- ^ a b R Prasad (2009), A Historical-developmental Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals, Concept Publishing, ISBN 978-81-8069-595-7, pp. 345–347
- ^ Eliade 2009, pp. 73–76.
- ^ Radhakrishnan & Moore 1967, pp. 37–39, 401–403, 498–503.
- ^ Monier-Williams 2001.
- ^ a b c d Buttimer, Anne; Wallin, L. (1999). Nature and Identity in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Springer. pp. 64–68. ISBN 978-0-7923-5651-6. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- ^ Berntsen, Maxine (1988). The Experience of Hinduism: Essays on Religion in Maharashtra. State University of New York Press. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-0-88706-662-7.
- ^ Taittiriya Upanishad Thirteen Principal Upanishads, Robert Hume (Translator), pp. 281–282;
Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1468-4, pp. 229–231 - ^ Mabry, John R. (2006). Noticing the Divine: An Introduction to Interfaith Spiritual Guidance. New York: Morehouse. pp. 32–33. ISBN 978-0-8192-2238-1. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- ^ Samovar, Larry A.; Porter, Richard E.; McDaniel, Edwin R.; et al. (2016). Communication Between Cultures. Cengage. pp. 140–144. ISBN 978-1-305-88806-7. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- ^ Werner 2005, pp. 9, 15, 49, 54, 86.
- ^ Renou 1964, p. 55.
- ^ a b Harman 2004, pp. 104–106
- ^ Harlan, Lindsey (1992). Religion and Rajput Women: The Ethic of Protection in Contemporary Narratives. University of California Press. pp. 19–20, 48 with footnotes. ISBN 978-0-520-07339-5. Archived from the original on 17 August 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
- ^ a b * Hark & DeLisser 2011, p. [page needed]. "Three gods or Trimurti, Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, and other deities are considered manifestations of and are worshipped as incarnations of Brahman."
- Toropov & Buckles 2011, p. [page needed]. "The members of various Hindu sects worship a dizzying number of specific deities and follow innumerable rituals in honor of specific gods. Because this is Hinduism, however, its practitioners see the profusion of forms and practices as expressions of the same unchanging reality. The panoply of deities is understood by believers as symbols for a single transcendent reality."
- Espín & Nickoloff 2007, p. [page needed]. "The devas are powerful spiritual beings, somewhat like angels in the West, who have certain functions in the cosmos and live immensely long lives. Certain devas, such as Ganesha, are regularly worshiped by the Hindu faithful. Note that, while Hindus believe in many devas, many are monotheistic to the extent that they will recognise only one Supreme Being, a God or Goddess who is the source and ruler of the devas."
- ^ Bassuk, Daniel E (1987). Incarnation in Hinduism and Christianity: The Myth of the God-Man. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 2–4. ISBN 978-1-349-08642-9. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- ^ Hacker, Paul (1978). Schmithausen, Lambert (ed.). Zur Entwicklung der Avataralehre (in German). Otto Harrassowitz. pp. 424, also 405–409, 414–417. ISBN 978-3-447-04860-6.
- ^ Kinsley, David (2005). Jones, Lindsay (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 2 (Second ed.). Thomson Gale. pp. 707–708. ISBN 978-0-02-865735-6.
- ^ Bryant 2007, p. 18.
- ^ McDaniel, June (2004). Offering Flowers, Feeding Skulls: Popular Goddess Worship in West Bengal: Popular Goddess Worship in West Bengal. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 90–91. ISBN 978-0-19-534713-5.
- ^ Hawley, John Stratton; Narayanan, Vasudha (2006). The life of Hinduism. University of California Press. p. 174. ISBN 978-0-520-24914-1. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Kinsley, David R. (1998). Tantric Visions of the Divine Feminine: The Ten Mahāvidyās. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 115–119. ISBN 978-81-208-1522-3. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- ^ "Shiva" in Lochtefeld 2002b, p. 635
- ^ John Clayton (2010), Religions, Reasons and Gods: Essays in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Religion, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-12627-4, page 150
- ^ Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0365-7, pp. 209–210
- ^ Reichenbach, Bruce R. (April 1989). "Karma, causation, and divine intervention". Philosophy East and West. 39 (2): 135–149 [145]. doi:10.2307/1399374. JSTOR 1399374. Archived from the original on 27 October 2009. Retrieved 29 December 2009.
- ^ Rajadhyaksha (1959). The six systems of Indian philosophy. p. 95. Archived from the original on 1 January 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
Under the circumstances God becomes an unnecessary metaphysical assumption. Naturally the Sankhyakarikas do not mention God, Vachaspati interprets this as rank atheism.
- ^ a b Coward 2008, p. 114: "For the Mimamsa the ultimate reality is nothing other than the eternal words of the Vedas. They did not accept the existence of a single supreme creator god, who might have composed the Veda. According to the Mimamsa, gods named in the Vedas have no existence apart from the mantras that speak their names. The power of the gods, then, is nothing other than the power of the mantras that name them."
- ^ Sen Gupta 1986, p. viii.
- ^ Neville, Robert (2001). Religious truth. SUNY Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-7914-4778-9. Archived from the original on 1 January 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
Mimamsa theorists (theistic and atheistic) decided that the evidence allegedly proving the existence of God was insufficient. They also thought there was no need to postulate a maker for the world, just as there was no need for an author to compose the Veda or an independent God to validate the Vedic rituals.
- ^ A Goel (1984), Indian philosophy: Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika and modern science, Sterling, ISBN 978-0-86590-278-7, pp. 149–151
- ^ Collins, Randall (2000), The sociology of philosophies, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-00187-9, p. 836
- ^ Klostermaier 2007, pp. 337–338.
- ^ Burley, Mikel (2012). Classical Samkhya and Yoga – An Indian Metaphysics of Experience. Routledge. pp. 39–41. ISBN 978-0-415-64887-5.;
Pflueger, Lloyd (2008). Knut Jacobsen (ed.). Person Purity and Power in Yogasutra, in Theory and Practice of Yoga. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 38–39. ISBN 978-81-208-3232-9.;
Behanan, K. T. (2002). Yoga: Its Scientific Basis. Dover. pp. 56–58. ISBN 978-0-486-41792-9. - ^ Knut Jacobsen (2008), Theory and Practice of Yoga: Essays in Honour of Gerald James Larson, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-3232-9, pp. 77–78
- ^ Rankin, John (1 June 1984). "Teaching Hinduism: Some Key Ideas". British Journal of Religious Education. 6 (3): 133–160. doi:10.1080/0141620840060306. ISSN 0141-6200.
- ^ Bryant 2007, p. 441.
- ^ Flood 2003, pp. 200–203.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Frazier, Jessica (2011). The Continuum companion to Hindu studies. London: Continuum. pp. 14–15, 321–325. ISBN 978-0-8264-9966-0.
- ^ Lochtefeld 2002a, p. 427.
- ^ Muesse 2011, p. 216. "rituals daily prescribe routine"
- ^ Heitzman & Worden 1996, pp. 145–146.
- ^ Sharma, A (1985). "Marriage in the Hindu religious tradition". Journal of Ecumenical Studies. 22 (1): 69–80.
- ^ Holdrege 1996, pp. 346–347.
- ^ a b c Holdrege 1996, p. 347.
- ^ Klostermaier 2007, pp. 36–37.
- ^ NK Brahma, Philosophy of Hindu Sādhanā, ISBN 978-8120333062, pp. ix–x
- ^ a b Pandey, R (1969). Hindu Saṁskāras: Socio-Religious Study of the Hindu Sacraments (2nd ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0434-0.
- ^ Knipe, David (2015). Vedic Voices: Intimate Narratives of a Living Andhra Tradition. Oxford University Press. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-19-939769-3.
- ^ a b c Kane, PV (1941). "Saṁskāra". History of Dharmasastras. Part I. Vol. II. Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. pp. 190–417.
- ^ a b Olivelle, Patrick (2009b). Dharmasutras – The Law Codes of Ancient India. Oxford University Press. pp. 90–91. ISBN 978-0-19-955537-6.
- ^ Olson, Carl (2007). The Many Colors of Hinduism: A Thematic-historical Introduction. Rutgers University Press. pp. 93–94. ISBN 978-0-8135-4068-9.
- ^ For Vedic school, see: Smith, Brian K. (1986). "Ritual, Knowledge, and Being: Initiation and Veda Study in Ancient India". Numen. 33 (1): 65–89. doi:10.2307/3270127. JSTOR 3270127.
- ^ For music school, see: Arnold, Alison; et al. (1999). The Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia. Vol. 5. Routledge. p. 459. ISBN 978-0-8240-4946-1. For sculpture, crafts and other professions, see: Elgood, Heather (2000). Hinduism and the religious arts. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 32–134. ISBN 978-0-304-70739-3.
- ^ Siqueira, Thomas N. (March 1935). "The Vedic Sacraments". Thought. 9 (4): 598–609. doi:10.5840/thought1935945.
- ^ Heitzman & Worden 1996, pp. 146–148.
- ^ Pechelis, Karen (2011). "Bhakti Traditions". In Frazier, Jessica; Flood, Gavin (eds.). The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies. Bloomsbury. pp. 107–121. ISBN 978-0-8264-9966-0.
- ^ Lochtefeld 2002a, pp. 98–100; also see articles on karmamārga and jnanamārga
- ^ Sahajananda, John Martin (2014). Fully Human Fully Divine. Partridge India. p. 60. ISBN 978-1-4828-1955-7.
- ^ Tiwari, Kedar Nath (2009). Comparative Religion. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 31. ISBN 978-81-208-0293-3.
- ^ Huyler, Stephen (2002). Meeting God: Elements of Hindu Devotion. Yale University Press. pp. 10–11, 71. ISBN 978-0-300-08905-9. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
- ^ Gonda, Jan (1963). "The Indian Mantra". Oriens. 16: 244–297. doi:10.1163/18778372-01601016.
- ^ Fowler 1997, pp. 41–50.
- ^ a b Foulston, Lynn (2012). Cush, Denise; et al. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Routledge. pp. 21–22, 868. ISBN 978-1-135-18978-5. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 10 November 2017.
- ^ a b Lutgendorf, Philip (2007). Hanuman's Tale: The Messages of a Divine Monkey. Oxford University Press. p. 401. ISBN 978-0-19-804220-4. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Pal, Pratapaditya, ed. (1995). Ganesh, the benevolent. Bombay: Marg Publications. ISBN 81-85026-31-9. OCLC 34752006.
- ^ Raj, Dhooleka S. (2003). Where Are You From?: Middle-Class Migrants in the Modern World. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-23382-9. JSTOR 10.1525/j.ctt1pn917.
- ^ Lutgendorf, Philip (2007). Hanuman's Tale: The Messages of a Divine Monkey. Oxford University Press. pp. 23, 262. ISBN 978-0-19-804220-4. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Williams, Raymond Brady (2018). Introduction to Swaminarayan Hinduism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 84, 153–154. ISBN 978-1-108-42114-0. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Lochtefeld 2002a, p. 51.
- ^ DeNapoli, Antoinette (2014). Real Sadhus Sing to God. Oxford University Press. pp. 19–24. ISBN 978-0-19-994003-5.
- ^ Reinhart, Robin (2004). Contemporary Hinduism: ritual, culture, and practice. Abc-Clio. pp. 35–47. ISBN 978-1-57607-905-8.
- ^ Prentiss 2014.
- ^ Sharma 2000, pp. 72–75.
- ^ Prentiss 2014, pp. 22–29.
- ^ Jones, Lindsay, ed. (2005). Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 2. Thomson Gale. pp. 856–857. ISBN 978-0-02-865735-6.
- ^ Robinson, Bob (2011). Hindus meeting Christians. OCMS. pp. 288–295. ISBN 978-1-870345-39-2;
Vroom, Hendrick (1996). No Other Gods. Cambridge: Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 68–69. ISBN 978-0-8028-4097-4. - ^ Smart, Ninian (2012). The Yogi and the Devotee. Routledge. pp. 52–80. ISBN 978-0-415-68499-6.
- ^ Ardley, Jane (2015). Spirituality and Politics: Gandhian and Tibetan cases, in The Tibetan Independence Movement. Routledge. pp. ix, 98–99, 112–113. ISBN 978-1-138-86264-7;
Mitchell, Helen (2014). Roots of Wisdom: A Tapestry of Philosophical Traditions. Cengage Learning. pp. 188–189. ISBN 978-1-285-19712-8. - ^ Bhavasar, SN (2004). Sundararajan, K. R.; Mukerji, Bithika (eds.). Hindu Spirituality: Postclassical and Modern. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 28–29. ISBN 978-81-208-1937-5.
- ^ a b Robinson, Sandra (2007). Cush, Denise; et al. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Routledge. pp. 908–912. ISBN 978-0-7007-1267-0.
- ^ a b Yust, Karen-Marie (2005). "Sacred Celebrations, see also Chapter 18.". Nurturing Child and Adolescent Spirituality. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 234. ISBN 978-0-7425-4463-5.
- ^ a b Robinson, Sandra (2007). Cush, Denise; et al. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Routledge. p. 907. ISBN 978-0-7007-1267-0.
- ^ Foulston, Lynn; Abbott, Stuart (2009). Hindu Goddesses: Beliefs and Practices. Sussex Academic Press. p. 155. ISBN 978-1-902210-43-8.
- ^ Holberg 2000, Festival calendar of India, p. 120: "Raksha Bandhan (also called Rakhi), when girls and women tie a rakhi (a symbolic thread) on their brothers' wrists and pray for their prosperity, happiness and goodwill. The brothers, in turn, give their sisters a token gift and promise protection."
- ^ Frazier, Jessica (2015). The Bloomsbury Companion to Hindu Studies. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 255, 271–273. ISBN 978-1-4725-1151-5.
- ^ Fuller 2004, pp. 204–05.
- ^ Lochtefeld 2002b, pp. 698–699.
- ^ Jacobsen 2013, pp. 4, 22, 27, 140–148, 157–158.
- ^ Bhardwaj 1983, p. 2.
- ^ Sharma, Krishan; Sinha, Anil Kishore; Banerjee, Bijon Gopal (2009). Anthropological Dimensions of Pilgrimage. Northern Book Centre. pp. 3–5. ISBN 978-81-89091-09-5. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
- ^ Maw, Geoffrey Waring (1997). Pilgrims in Hindu Holy Land: Sacred Shrines of the Indian Himalayas. Sessions Book Trust. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-85072-190-1. Archived from the original on 16 February 2017. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
- ^ Jacobsen 2013, pp. 157–158.
- ^ Michaels 2004, pp. 288–289.
- ^ Kane 1953, p. 561.
- ^ a b Eck 2012, pp. 7–9.
- ^ Glucklich, Ariel (2008). The Strides of Vishnu: Hindu Culture in Historical Perspective: Hindu Culture in Historical Perspective. Oxford University Press. p. 146. ISBN 978-0-19-971825-2. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
The earliest promotional works aimed at tourists from that era were called mahatmyas [in Puranas].
- ^ Kane 1953, pp. 559–560.
- ^ Holm & Bowker 2001, p. 68.
- ^ Rocher 1986, p. [page needed].
- ^ Kane 1953, pp. 553–556, 560–561.
- ^ a b c Eck 2013, pp. 152–154.
- ^ Klostermaier 2010, p. 553, note 55.
- ^ Dalal 2010, chapter Kumbh Mela.
- ^ Eck 2012, pp. 9–11.
- ^ Bhardwaj 1983, p. 6.
- ^ a b c d Eck 2012, p. 9.
- ^ Bharati, Agehananda (1963). "Pilgrimage in the Indian Tradition". History of Religions. 3 (1): 135–167. doi:10.1086/462476. S2CID 162220544.
- ^ Maclean, Kama (2008). Pilgrimage and Power: The Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, 1765–1954. Oxford University Press. pp. 228–229. ISBN 978-0-19-971335-6. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 18 November 2017.
- ^ Lochtefeld 2002a, p. 68.
- ^ Bhardwaj 1983, pp. 3–5.
- ^ Amazzone, Laura (2012). Goddess Durga and Sacred Female Power. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 43–45. ISBN 978-0-7618-5314-5. Archived from the original on 11 November 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
- ^ Holm & Bowker 2001, pp. 69–77.
- ^ Lingat 1973, pp. 98–99.
- ^ Bhardwaj 1983, p. 4.
- ^ Kane 1953, p. 573.
- ^ Kane 1953, pp. 576–577.
- ^ Acharya 1927, p. xviii-xx.
- ^ Sinha 1998, pp. 27–41
- ^ Acharya 1927, p. xviii-xx, Appendix I lists hundreds of Hindu architectural texts.
- ^ Shukla 1993.
- ^ Smith, Vincent Arthur (1977). Research Articles in Epigraphy, Archaeology, and Numismatics of India. Sheikh Mubarak Ali.
- ^ K. Krishna Murthy (1987). Early Indian Secular Architecture. Sundeep Prakashan. pp. 5–16. ISBN 978-81-85067-01-8.
- ^ Branfoot, Crispin (2008). "Imperial Frontiers: Building Sacred Space in Sixteenth-Century South India". The Art Bulletin. 90 (2). Taylor & Francis: 171–194. doi:10.1080/00043079.2008.10786389. S2CID 154135978.
- ^ James C. Harle (1994). The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent. Yale University Press. pp. 330–331. ISBN 978-0-300-06217-5.
- ^ James C. Harle (1994). The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent. Yale University Press. pp. 43–47, 67–68, 467–480. ISBN 978-0-300-06217-5.
- ^ a b B. Richmond (1956). Time Measurement and Calendar Construction. Brill Archive. pp. 80–82. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 18 September 2011.
- ^ a b Christopher John Fuller (2004). The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India. Princeton University Press. pp. 109–110. ISBN 978-0-691-12048-5. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
- ^ Klaus K. Klostermaier (2007). A Survey of Hinduism: Third Edition. State University of New York Press. p. 490. ISBN 978-0-7914-7082-4. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 10 June 2023.
- ^ a b Eleanor Nesbitt (2016). Sikhism: a Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. pp. 122–123. ISBN 978-0-19-874557-0. Archived from the original on 15 April 2023. Retrieved 10 June 2023.
- ^ Orazio Marucchi (2011). Christian Epigraphy: An Elementary Treatise with a Collection of Ancient Christian Inscriptions Mainly of Roman Origin. Cambridge University Press. p. 289. ISBN 978-0-521-23594-5., Quote: "the lunar year consists of 354 days".
- ^ Anita Ganeri (2003). Buddhist Festivals Through the Year. BRB. pp. 11–12. ISBN 978-1-58340-375-4.
- ^ Long 2013, pp. 6–7.
- ^ John E. Cort (2001). Jains in the World: Religious Values and Ideology in India. Oxford University Press. pp. 142–146. ISBN 978-0-19-513234-2.
- ^ Robert E. Buswell Jr.; Donald S. Lopez Jr. (2013). The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. p. 156. ISBN 978-1-4008-4805-8.
- ^ "Ekadasi: Why Ekadasi is celebrated in Hinduism?-by Dr Bharti Raizada". NewsGram. 22 May 2017.[permanent dead link]
- ^ Sharma 2000, pp. 132–180.
- ^ Halbfass 1995, p. 264.
- ^ Silverberg 1969, pp. 442–443
- ^ Smelser & Lipset 2005.
- ^ Smith, Huston (1994). "Hinduism: The Stations of Life". The Illustrated World's Religions. New York: Harper Collins. ISBN 978-0-06-067440-3.
- ^ Michaels 2004, pp. 188–197.
- ^ Pattanaik, Devdutt (27 September 2025). "How caste manifested before the British". The Economic Times. ISSN 0013-0389. Retrieved 5 October 2025.
- ^ Jhingran, Saral (1989). Aspects of Hindu Morality. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. p. 143. ISBN 978-81-208-0574-3. OCLC 905765957.
- ^ Chandra, Suresh (1998). Encyclopaedia of Hindu Gods and Goddesses (1st ed.). New Delhi: Sarup & Sons. p. 178. ISBN 978-81-7625-039-9. OCLC 40479929.
- ^ Bhaskarananda 1994
- ^ Jain 2015, pp. 130–157.
- ^ Doniger 2000, p. 1041.
- ^ Napier, A David (1987). Masks, Transformation, and Paradox. University of California Press. pp. 186–187. ISBN 978-0-520-04533-0.
- ^ Sharma, SD (2010). Rice: Origin, Antiquity and History. CRC Press. pp. 68–70. ISBN 978-1-57808-680-1.
- ^ Rao, TA Gopinath (1998). Elements of Hindu iconography. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-81-208-0878-2.
- ^ Banerjea, JN (September 2004). The Development of Hindu Iconography. Kessinger. pp. 247–248, 472–508. ISBN 978-1-4179-5008-9.
- ^ Babary, Abrar; Zeeshan, Mahwish. "Reminiscent of Hinduism: An Insight of Katas Raj Mandir" (PDF). The Explorer: Journal of Social Sciences. 1 (4): 122. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 November 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
- ^ Monier-Williams 1974.
- ^ Radhakrishnan, S. (1929). Indian Philosophy, Volume 1. Muirhead library of philosophy (2nd ed.). London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. p. 148.
- ^ For ahiṃsā as one of the "emerging ethical and religious issues" in the Mahābhārata see: Brockington, John (2003). "The Sanskrit Epics". Flood. p. 125.
- ^ For text of Y.S. 2.29 and translation of yama as "vow of self-restraint", see: Taimni, I. K. (1961). The Science of Yoga. Adyar, India: The Theosophical Publishing House. p. 206. ISBN 978-81-7059-212-9.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Aiyar, KN (1914). "22". Thirty Minor Upanishads. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 173–176. ISBN 978-1-164-02641-9.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Svatmarama; Brahmananda (2014). The Hathayogapradīpikā of Svātmārāma. verse 1.58–63, pp. 19–21.
- ^ Lorenzen, David (1972). The Kāpālikas and Kālāmukhas. University of California Press. pp. 186–190. ISBN 978-0-520-01842-6.
- ^ Narayanan, Vasudha (2007). "The Hindu Tradition". In Oxtoby, Willard G.; Segal, Alan F. (eds.). A Concise Introduction to World Religions. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-542207-8.
- ^ Rosen, Steven (2006). Essential Hinduism (1st ed.). Westport: Praeger Publishers. p. 188.
- ^ Chapple, Christopher Key (2009). The Bhagavad Gita (25th Anniversary ed.). State University of New York Press. pp. 641–643. ISBN 978-1-4384-2842-0.
- ^ Surveys studying food habits of Indians include:
- Delgado, Christopher L.; Narrod, Claire A.; Tiongco, Marites (24 July 2003). "Growth and Concentration in India". Policy, Technical, and Environmental Determinants and Implications of the Scaling-Up of Livestock Production in Four Fast-Growing Developing Countries: A Synthesis. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
An analysis of consumption data originating from National Sample Survey (NSS) shows that 42 percent of households are vegetarian, in that they never eat fish, meat or eggs. The remaining 58 percent of households are less strict vegetarians or non-vegetarians.
- Goldammer, Ted. "Passage to India" (PDF). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 June 2009.
- Landes, Maurice R. (February 2004). "The Elephant Is Jogging: New Pressures for Agricultural Reform in India". Amber Waves. Archived from the original on 28 December 2006.
Results indicate that Indians who eat meat do so infrequently with less than 30% consuming non-vegetarian foods regularly, although the reasons may be economical.
- Delgado, Christopher L.; Narrod, Claire A.; Tiongco, Marites (24 July 2003). "Growth and Concentration in India". Policy, Technical, and Environmental Determinants and Implications of the Scaling-Up of Livestock Production in Four Fast-Growing Developing Countries: A Synthesis. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Gregory, Neville; Grandin, Temple (2007). Animal Welfare and Meat Production. CABI. pp. 206–208. ISBN 978-1-84593-215-2.
- ^ Das, Veena (2003). The Oxford India companion to sociology and social anthropology. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 151–152. ISBN 978-0-19-564582-8.
- ^ Grover, Neelam; Singh, Kashi N. (2004). Cultural Geography, Form and Process, Concept. Concept Publishing Company. p. 366. ISBN 978-81-8069-074-7.
- ^ Jagannathan, Maithily (2005). South Indian Hindu Festivals and Traditions. Abhinav. pp. 53, 69. ISBN 978-81-7017-415-8; Min, Pyong Gap (2010). Preserving Ethnicity through Religion in America. New York University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-8147-9586-6.
- ^ Uttara Kennedy; Arvind Sharma; Clive J.C. Philips (2018). "The Sheltering of Unwanted Cattle, Experiences in India and Implications for Cattle Industries Elsewhere". Animals. 8 (5): 64. doi:10.3390/ani8050064. PMC 5981275. PMID 29701646.
- ^ Marvin Harris. India's scared cow (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 September 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
- ^ Gloria Pungetti; Anna Maclvor. "Preliminary Literature Review On Scared Species" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 July 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
- ^ Walker 1968, p. 257.
- ^ Richman 1988, p. 272.
- ^ Mansingh, Ajai (2016). "Stewards of Creation Covenant: Hinduism and the Environment". Caribbean Quarterly. 41 (1). A Journal of Caribbean Culture: 62. doi:10.1080/00086495.1995.11672075. Archived from the original on 7 September 2021. Retrieved 7 September 2021.
- ^ Williams, Raymond (2001). An Introduction to Swaminarayan Hinduism (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 159. ISBN 978-0-521-65279-7.
- ^ Smith, Harold F. (2007). "12". Outline of Hinduism. Read Books. ISBN 978-1-4067-8944-7.
- ^ a b Fuller 2004, p. 83, "Chapter 4".
- ^ Yayasan, Bumi Kita (2005). "The Hidden Life of Bali". In Gouyon, Anne (ed.). The natural guide to Bali: enjoy nature, meet the people, make a difference. Equinox Publishing (Asia). p. 51. ISBN 978-979-3780-00-9. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 12 August 2010.
- ^ Gwynne, Paul (2011). World Religions in Practice: A Comparative Introduction. John Wiley & Sons. p. 5 footnote 16. ISBN 978-1-4443-6005-9.
- ^ Olcott, H.S. (1906). The Theosophist. Vol. XXVII. Theosophical Publishing House. pp. 146 with footnote. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2016., Quote: "It is well known that Vaishnavas abhor animal sacrifice. In this province, like nearly all Bengalis, they celebrate Durga Puja, but their ceremonies are bloodless".
- ^ Fuller 2004, pp. 101–102, Quote: "Blood sacrifice was a clear case in point, (, , , ) sacrifice was a barbarity inconsistent with Hinduism's central tenet of non-violence. [...] Contemporary opposition to animal sacrifice rests on an old foundation, although it also stems from the very widespread influence of reformism, whose antipathy to ritual killing has spread well beyond the self-consciously nationalist political classes"..
- ^ Nicholson 2010, p. 169, Quote: "The acceptance of the principle of non-violence has been so through that animal sacrifice among Hindus today is uncommon, and many Indians are of the opinion that such things as cow slaughter were never practiced in ancient India".
- ^ Bekoff, Marc (2009). Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare (2nd ed.). ABC-CLIO. p. 482. ISBN 978-0-313-35256-0. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
- ^ Michell 1988, pp. 61–65.
- ^ a b c d Kramrisch 1976a, pp. 1–16
- ^ Kramrisch 1976a, pp. 161–169.
- ^ Kramrisch 1976b, pp. 346–357, 423–424.
- ^ Klostermaier 2007a, pp. 268–277.
- ^ Stein, Burton (February 1960). "The Economic Function of a Medieval South Indian Temple". The Journal of Asian Studies. 19 (2): 163–176. doi:10.2307/2943547. JSTOR 2943547. S2CID 162283012.
- ^ Michell 1988, pp. 58–65.
- ^ Boner, Alice (1990). Principles of Composition in Hindu Sculpture: Cave Temple Period. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. Introduction and pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-81-208-0705-1.
- ^ Meister, Michael W. (1981). "Forest and Cave: Temples at Candrabhāgā and Kansuān". Archives of Asian Art. 34: 56–73. JSTOR 20111117.
- ^ Kramrisch 1976a, pp. 8–9.
- ^ Olivelle, Patrick (1993). The Āśrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of a Religious Institution. Oxford University Press. pp. 1–29, 84–111. ISBN 978-0-19-508327-9. OCLC 466428084.
- ^ a b Sharma, RK (1999). Indian Society, Institutions and Change. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. p. 28. ISBN 978-81-7156-665-5.
- ^ a b c Widgery 1930.
- ^ Nugteren, Albertina (2005). Belief, Bounty, And Beauty: Rituals Around Sacred Trees in India. Brill Academic. pp. 13–21. ISBN 978-90-04-14601-3.
- ^ Saraswathi; et al. (2010). "Reconceptualizing Lifespan Development through a Hindu Perspective". In Jensen, Lene Arnett (ed.). Bridging Cultural and Developmental Approaches to Psychology. Oxford University Press. pp. 280–286. ISBN 978-0-19-538343-0.
- ^ Radhakrishnan 1922.
- ^ a b Bhawuk, DP (2011). "The Paths of Bondage and Liberation". Spirituality and Indian Psychology. Springer. pp. 93–110. ISBN 978-1-4419-8109-7.
- ^ Holdrege, Barbara (2004). "Dharma". In Mittal, Sushil; Thursby, Gene (eds.). The Hindu World. Routledge. p. 231. ISBN 978-0-415-21527-5.
- ^ Olivelle, Patrick (1993). The Ashrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of a Religious Institution. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-534478-3.
- ^ Bhaskarananda 1994, p. 112
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 316.
- ^ a b Lockard 2007, p. 50.
- ^ Osborne 2005, p. 9.
- ^ Samuel 2010, pp. 48–53.
- ^ Lockard 2007, p. 52.
- ^ a b Gomez 2013, p. 42.
- ^ Michaels 2004, pp. 32–36.
- ^ Witzel 1995, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Flood 1996, p. 21.
- ^ Michaels 2004, p. 38.
- ^ J. J. Navone, S. J. (1956). "Sankara and the Vedic Tradition". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 17 (2): 248–255. doi:10.2307/2104222. ISSN 0031-8205. JSTOR 2104222.
- ^ Blackwell's History of India; Stein 2010, page 107
- ^ Some Aspects of Muslim Administration, R.P.Tripathi, 1956, p. 24
- ^ Lal, Kishori Saran (1999). Theory and Practice of Muslim State in India. Aditya Prakashan. pp. 90–145. ISBN 978-81-86471-72-2.
- ^ Priolkar, Anand Kakba (1992). The Goa Inquisition. South Asia Books. pp. 2–67, 184. ISBN 978-0-8364-2753-0.
- ^ Souza, Teotonio R. De (1994). Discoveries, Missionary Expansion, and Asian Cultures. Concept Publishing Company. p. 80. ISBN 978-81-7022-497-6.
- ^ Sharma 2002, p. 27.
- ^ a b Vir, Dharam (1988). Education and Polity in Nepal: An Asian Experiment. Northern Book Centre. pp. 56. ISBN 978-81-85119-39-7.
- ^ Younger, Paul (2010). New homelands: Hindu communities in Mauritius, Guyana, Trinidad, South Africa, Fiji, and East Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–17. ISBN 978-0-19-539164-0. Retrieved 4 June 2022.
- ^ Sharma 2003, pp. 176–189; Thapar 1993, pp. 239–241.
- ^ "Twentieth Century Atlas – Death Tolls and Casualty Statistics for Wars, Dictatorships and Genocides". necrometrics.com. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
- ^ "The remarkable political influence of the Indian diaspora in the US". www.lowyinstitute.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ "UK Hindu population to be studied". Hindustan Times. 2 March 2006. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ Kim, Sebastian 2005, pp. 1–29.
- ^ Masud, Muhammad Khalid (2005). Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas. Harvard University Press. pp. 193–203. ISBN 978-0-19-597911-4. JSTOR 846021.
- ^ Barua 2015, Ch. 2 and 8.
- ^ Ramstedt 2004, pp. 93–108, Robert Hefner. Hindu Reform in an Islamising Java: Pluralism and Peril.
- ^ a b c Sharma 2011, pp. 31–53
- ^ a b Adcock, CS (2014). The Limits of Tolerance: Indian Secularism and the Politics of Religious Freedom. Oxford University Press. pp. 1–35, 115–168. ISBN 978-0-19-999544-8.
- ^ Coward, Harold (1987). Modern Indian Responses to Religious Pluralism. SUNY Press. pp. 49–60. ISBN 978-0-88706-572-9.
- ^ Viswanathan, Gauri (1998). Outside the Fold: Conversion, Modernity, and Belief. Princeton University Press. pp. 153–176. ISBN 978-0-691-05899-3.
- ^ Elst, Koenraad (2001). Decolonizing the Hindu Mind: Ideological Development of Hindu Revivalism. Rupa & Company. ISBN 978-81-7167-519-7.
- ^ Pradhan, K. L. (2012). Thapa Politics in Nepal: With Special Reference to Bhim Sen Thapa, 1806–1839. Concept Publishing Company. ISBN 978-81-8069-813-2.
- ^ "Table: Religious Composition (%) by Country" (PDF). Pew Research Center. Global Religious Composition. 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 August 2013. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- ^ "The World Factbook". Retrieved 6 August 2010.
- ^ "Hindus". 18 December 2012.
- ^ "By 2050, India to have world's largest populations of Hindus and Muslims". Pew Research Center. 21 April 2015. Archived from the original on 22 April 2015. Retrieved 17 November 2020.
- ^ "Penduduk Menurut Wilayah dan Agama yang Dianut" [Population by Region and Religion Adhered to] (in Indonesian). Statistics Indonesia. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
- ^ "Religious Demographics of Pakistan 2023" (PDF). pbs.gov.pk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 July 2024. Retrieved 21 July 2024.
- ^ "Vietnam". State.gov. 22 October 2002. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
- ^ "The Future of World Religions" (PDF). Pew Research. 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 May 2015.
- ^ Schwarz, John (2015). What's Christianity All About?. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 176. ISBN 978-1-4982-2537-3.
- ^ Wormald, Benjamin (2 April 2015). "The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010–2050". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. Retrieved 4 March 2021.
- ^ "2011 Nepal Census Report" (PDF). 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2013.
- ^ "Population of India Today". livepopulation.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 5 August 2018.
- ^ "Resident population by religion and sex" (PDF). Statistics Mauritius. p. 68. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 October 2013. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
- ^ "National Profiles | World Religion". www.thearda.com.
- ^ "The World Factbook". Retrieved 10 May 2011.
- ^ "National Profiles; World Religion". www.thearda.com.
- ^ "Bhutan". U.S. Department of State. Archived from the original on 30 November 2009.
- ^ "Suriname". U.S. Department of State. Archived from the original on 30 November 2009.
- ^ "Qatar – The World Factbook". May 2024.
- ^ "The Census of Population and Housing of Sri Lanka-2011". Department of Census and Statistics. 2011. Archived from the original on 24 December 2018. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
- ^ Marsh 2015, pp. 67–94.
- ^ "SVRS 2010" (PDF). Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. p. 176 (Table P–14). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 November 2012. Retrieved 2 September 2012.
- ^ "United Arab Emirates". U.S. Department of State.
- ^ "The World Factbook". Retrieved 10 May 2011.
- ^ "Pew-Templeton: Global Religious Futures Project". www.globalreligiousfutures.org. Archived from the original on 3 May 2013. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
- ^ "Middle East OMAN". CIA The World Factbook. 22 September 2021.
- ^ "Seychelles Population and Housing Census 2022". National Bureau of Statistics Seychelles. 21 March 2024. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
- ^ Singapore Department of Statistics (12 January 2011). "Census of population 2010: Statistical Release 1 on Demographic Characteristics, Education, Language and Religion" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2011.
- ^ "Indonesia: Religious Freedoms Report 2010". US State Department. 2011. Retrieved 4 March 2021.
The Ministry of Religious Affairs estimates that 10 million Hindus live in the country and account for approximately 90 percent of the population in Bali. Hindu minorities also reside in Central and East Kalimantan, the city of Medan (North Sumatra), South and Central Sulawesi, and Lombok (West Nusa Tenggara). Hindu groups such as Hare Krishna and followers of the Indian spiritual leader Sai Baba are present in small numbers. Some indigenous religious groups, including the "Naurus" on Seram Island in Maluku Province, incorporate Hindu and animist beliefs, and many have also adopted some Protestant teachings.
- ^ "Table 26, 2018 Census Data – Tables" (xlsx). Archived from the original on 13 April 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ Australian Bureau of Statistics (18 January 2018). "Media Release – Census reveals Australia's religious diversity on World Religion Day". www.abs.gov.au. Retrieved 4 June 2023.
- ^ "Wayback Machine" (PDF). www.pbs.gov.pk.
Sources
[edit]For references on specific authors or topics, please see the relevant article.
Printed sources
[edit]- Acharya, P. K. (1927). Indian Architecture according to the Manasara Shilpa Shastra. London: Oxford University Press (Republ. by Motilal Banarsidass). ISBN 0-300-06217-6.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - Acri, Andrea; Creese, Helen; Griffiths, Arlo, eds. (2011). From Lanka Eastwards: The Ramayaṇa in the Literature and Visual Arts of Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press.
- Bakker, F.L. (1997). "Balinese Hinduism and the Indonesian State: Recent Developments". Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 153 (1): 15–41. doi:10.1163/22134379-90003943. JSTOR 27864809. S2CID 162277591.
- Barua, Ankur (2015). Debating 'Conversion' in Hinduism and Christianity. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-84701-9.
- Beck, Guy L., ed. (2005). Alternative Krishnas: Regional and Vernacular Variations on a Hindu Deity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-6415-1.
- Bhardwaj, Surinder Mohan (1983). Hindu Places of Pilgrimage in India: A Study in Cultural Geography. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-04951-2.
- Bhaskarananda, Swami (1994). Essentials of Hinduism. Viveka Press. ISBN 978-1-884852-02-2.
- Bhattacharya, A (2006). Hindu Dharma: Introduction to Scriptures and Theology. iUniverse. ISBN 978-0-595-38455-6.
- Bilimoria, Purushottama; Prabhu, Joseph; Sharma, Renuka, eds. (2007). Indian Ethics: Classical Traditions and Contemporary Challenges. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-06269-6.
- Bowker, John (2000). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280094-7.
- Bhandarkar, R. G. (1913). Vaiṣṇavism, Śaivism and Minor Religious Systems. Grundriss der indo-arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde, 3.6. Strassburg: Trübner.
- Brodd, Jeffrey (2003). World Religions. Winona, MN: Saint Mary's Press. ISBN 978-0-88489-725-5.
- Bronkhorst, Johannes (2007). Greater Magadha: Studies in the Culture of Early India. Brill.
- Bryant, Edwin (2007). Krishna: A Sourcebook. Oxford University Press.
- Bryant, Edwin F.; Ekstrand, Maria, eds. (2004). The Hare Krishna Movement: The Postcharismatic Fate of a Religious Transplant. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-12256-X.
- Burley, Mikel (2007). Classical Samkhya and Yoga: An Indian Metaphysics of Experience. Taylor & Francis.
- Brodd, Jeffrey; Little, Layne; Nystrom, Bradley; Platzner, Robert; Shek, Richard; Stiles, Erin (2018). "Hinduism". Invitation to World Religions (3 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-069081-6.
- Carney, Gerald T. (2020). "Baba Premananda Bharati: his trajectory into and through Bengal Vaiṣṇavism to the West". In Ferdinando Sardella; Lucian Wong (eds.). The Legacy of Vaiṣṇavism in Colonial Bengal. Routledge Hindu Studies Series. London; New York: Routledge. pp. 135–160. ISBN 978-1-138-56179-3.
- Christian, David (2011). Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-95067-2.
- Chung, Paul S. (2022). The Social Scientific Study of Religion: A Method for Constructive Theology. Lutterworth Press. ISBN 978-0-227-17768-6.
- Clarke, Peter Bernard (2006). New Religions in Global Perspective. Routledge. p. 209. ISBN 978-0-7007-1185-7.
- Clarke, Matthew (2011). Development and Religion: Theology and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-85793-073-6. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
- Cœdès, George (1968). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Translated by Susan Brown Cowing. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-0368-1.
- Coward, Harold (2008). The perfectibility of human nature in eastern and western thought. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-7336-8.
- Dalal, Roshen (2010). The Religions of India: A Concise Guide to Nine Major Faiths. Delhi: Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-341517-6.
- David, Bruno; Mullett, Russell; Wright, Nathan; Stephenson, Birgitta; Ash, Jeremy; Fresløv, Joanna; Delannoy, Jean-Jacques; McDowell, Matthew C.; Mialanes, Jerome; Petchey, Fiona; Arnold, Lee J.; Rogers, Ashleigh J.; Crouch, Joe; Green, Helen; Urwin, Chris; Matheson, Carney D. (1 July 2024). "Archaeological evidence of an ethnographically documented Australian Aboriginal ritual dated to the last ice age". Nature Human Behaviour. 8 (8): 1481–1492. doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01912-w. ISSN 2397-3374. PMC 11343701. PMID 38951612.
- Deutsch, Eliot (2001). "The self in Advaita Vedanta". In Roy Perrett (ed.). Indian philosophy: Volume 3, metaphysics. Taylor and Francis. pp. 343–360. ISBN 978-0-8153-3608-2.
- Deutsch, Eliot; Dalvi, Rohit (2004). The essential Vedanta. A New Source Book of Advaita Vedanta. World Wisdom. ISBN 978-0-941532-52-5.
- Dirks, Nicholas (2001). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08895-2.
- Dixon, R. M. W. (1996). "Origin legends and linguistic relationships". Oceania. 67 (2): 127–140. doi:10.1002/j.1834-4461.1996.tb02587.x. JSTOR 40331537.
- Doniger, Wendy (1990). Textual Sources for the Study of Hinduism. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-61847-0.
- Doniger, Wendy (2000). Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions. Merriam-Webster. ISBN 978-0-87779-044-0.
- Doniger, Wendy (2010). The Hindus: An Alternative History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-959334-7.
- Doniger, Wendy (2014). On Hinduism. Oxford University Press USA. ISBN 978-0-19-936007-9.
- Eck, Diana L. (2012). India: A Sacred Geography. Harmony. ISBN 978-0-385-53190-0.
- Eck, Diana L. (2013). India: A Sacred Geography. Random House. ISBN 978-0-385-53192-4.
- Eliade, Mircea (2009). Yoga: Immortality and Freedom. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-14203-6.
- Espín, Orlando O.; Nickoloff, James B., eds. (2007). An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-5856-7.
- Feuerstein, Georg (2002). The Yoga Tradition. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-3-935001-06-9.
- Flood, Gavin (1996). An Introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-43878-0. Archived from the original on 29 November 2016.
- Flood, Gavin (1997). "The Meaning and Context of the Puruṣārthas". In Lipner, Julius J. (ed.). The Bhagavadgītā for Our Times. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-565039-6.
- Flood, Gavin, ed. (2003). The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-21535-2. Archived from the original on 29 March 2024. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
- Flood, Gavin (2003a). "Introduction: Establishing the Boundaries". In Flood, Gavin (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Flood, Gavin (2022). The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Hinduism.
- Fowler, Jeaneane D. (1997). Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices. Sussex Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-898723-60-8.[permanent dead link]
- Fuller, Christopher John (2004). The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12048-5.
- Ghurye, Govind Sadashiv (1980). The Scheduled Tribes of India. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-0-87855-308-2.
- Gomez, Luis O. (2013) [1987]. "Buddhism in India". In Kitagawa, Joseph M. (ed.). The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture. London: RoutledgeCurzon. pp. 3–40. ISBN 978-1-136-87590-8.
- Gonda, Jan (1975). "The Indian Religions in Pre-Islamic Indonesia and their survival in Bali". Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 3. Southeast Asia, Religions. Leiden: Brill. pp. 1–47.
- Gosch, Stephen; Stearns, Peter (2007). Premodern Travel in World History. Routledge. pp. 88–99. ISBN 978-0-415-22941-8.
- Halbfass, Wilhelm (1988). India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. State University of New York Press.
- Halbfass, Wilhelm (1991). Tradition and Reflection. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-0361-7.
- Halbfass, Wilhelm (1995). Philology and Confrontation: Paul Hacker on Traditional and Modern Vedānta. SUNY Press.
- Hark, Lisa; DeLisser, Horace (7 September 2011). Achieving Cultural Competency. John Wiley & Sons.
- Harman, William (2004). "Hindu Devotion". In Rinehart, Robin (ed.). Contemporary Hinduism: Ritual, Culture, and Practice. ABC-CLIO. pp. 99–122. ISBN 978-1-57607-905-8.
- Harshananda, Swami (1989). "A Bird's Eye View of the Vedas". Holy Scriptures: A Symposium on the Great Scriptures of the World (2nd ed.). Mylapore: Sri Ramakrishna Math. ISBN 978-81-7120-121-1.
- Harvey, Andrew (2001). Teachings of the Hindu Mystics. Shambhala. ISBN 978-1-57062-449-0.
- Hatcher, Brian A. (2015). Hinduism in the Modern World. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-04631-6.
- Heesterman, Jan (2005). "Vedism and Brahmanism". In Jones, Lindsay (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Religion. Vol. 14 (2nd ed.). Macmillan Reference. pp. 9552–9553. ISBN 978-0-02-865733-2.
- Hefner, Robert W. (1989). Hindu Javanese: Tengger Tradition and Islam. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-09413-7.
- Heitzman, James; Worden, Robert L. (1996). India: a country study. Area handbook series. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. ISBN 978-0-8444-0833-0. LCCN 96019266. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020.
- Hiltebeitel, Alf (2002) [1987]. "Hinduism". In Kitagawa, Joseph M. (ed.). The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture. London: RoutledgeCurzon. pp. 3–40. ISBN 0-7007-1762-5.
- Holberg, Dale, ed. (2000). Students' Britannica India. Vol. 4. Encyclopædia Britannica India. p. 316. ISBN 978-0-85229-760-5.
- Holdrege, Barbara A. (1996). Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-1639-6.
- Holm, Jean; Bowker, John (2001) [1994]. Sacred Place (pb.). Continuum. ISBN 978-0-8264-5303-7. ISBN 978-1-6235-6623-4
- Hopfe, Lewis M.; Woodward, Mark R. (2008). Religions of the World. Pearson Education. ISBN 978-0-13-606177-9.
- Howe, Leo (2001). Hinduism & Hierarchy in Bali. Oxford: James Currey. ISBN 978-0-85255-914-7.
- Isaeva, Natalia (1995). From Early Vedanta to Kashmir Shaivism. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-2449-0.
- Jain, Andrea (2015). Selling Yoga: from Counterculture to Pop culture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-939024-3. OCLC 878953765.
- Jacobsen, Knut A. (2013). Pilgrimage in the Hindu Tradition: Salvific Space. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-59038-9.
- Jones, Constance A.; Ryan, James D. (2007). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Encyclopedia of World Religions. J. Gordon Melton, Series Editor. New York: Facts On File. ISBN 978-0-8160-5458-9.
- Kane, P. V. (1953). History of Dharmaśāstra: Ancient and Medieval Religious and Civil Law in India. Vol. 4.
- Kim, Sebastian (2005). In Search of Identity: Debates on Religious Conversion in India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-567712-6.
- King, Richard (1999). Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East". Routledge.
- King, Richard (2001). Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East". Taylor & Francis e-Library.
- Kinney, Ann R.; Klokke, Marijke J.; Kieven, Lydia (2003). Worshiping Siva and Buddha: The Temple Art of East Java. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-2779-3.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (1989). A Survey of Hinduism (1st ed.). SUNY Press. ISBN 978-1-4384-0934-4.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (1994). A Survey of Hinduism (2nd ed.). SUNY Press.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (2007). A Survey of Hinduism (3rd ed.). SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-7082-4.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (2010). A Survey of Hinduism (3rd ed.). SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-8011-3.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (5 July 2007a). "The Divine Presence in Space and Time – Murti, Tirtha, Kala". A Survey of Hinduism. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-7082-4.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (2007b). Hinduism: A Beginner's Guide. Oneworld Publications. ISBN 978-1-78074-026-3.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (2014). A Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Oneworld Publications. ISBN 978-1-78074-672-2.
- Knott, Kim (1998). Hinduism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-160645-8.
- Koller, John M. (1968). "Puruṣārtha as Human Aims". Philosophy East and West. 18 (4): 315–319. doi:10.2307/1398408. JSTOR 1398408.
- Kramer, Kenneth (1986). World Scriptures: An Introduction to Comparative Religions. Paulist Press. ISBN 978-0-8091-2781-8.
- Kramrisch, Stella (1976a). The Hindu Temple. Vol. 1. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0223-0.
- Kramrisch, Stella (1976b). The Hindu Temple. Vol. 2. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0224-7.
- Kurien, Prema (2006). "Multiculturalism and American Religion: The Case of Hindu Indian Americans". Social Forces. 85 (2): 723–741. doi:10.1353/sof.2007.0015. S2CID 146134214.
- Larson, Gerald (1995). India's Agony Over Religion. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-2411-7.
- Larson, Gerald James (2009). "Hinduism". World Religions in America: An Introduction. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 179–198. ISBN 978-1-61164-047-2.
- Leaf, Murray J. (2014). The Anthropology of Eastern Religions: Ideas, Organizations, and Constituencies. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-9241-2.
- Lipner, Julius (1998). Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-05182-8.
- Lingat, Robert (1973). The Classical Law of India. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-01898-3.
- Lipner, Julius (2009). Hindus: their religious beliefs and practices (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-86464-7. OCLC 812916971.
- Lochtefeld, James G. (2002a). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A–M. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8239-3179-8. ISBN 978-0-8239-2287-1.
- Lochtefeld, James G. (2002b). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: N–Z. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8239-3180-4.
- Lockard, Craig A. (2007). Societies, Networks, and Transitions. Volume I: to 1500. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-618-38612-3.
- Long, Jeffrey D. (2013). Jainism: An Introduction. I. B. Tauris.
- Lorenzen, David N. (1999). "Who Invented Hinduism?". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 41 (4): 630–659. doi:10.1017/s0010417599003084. JSTOR 179424. S2CID 247327484.
- Lorenzen, David N. (2002). "Early Evidence for Tantric Religion". In Harper, Katherine Anne; Brown, Robert L. (eds.). The Roots of Tantra. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-5306-3.
- Lorenzen, David N. (2006). Who Invented Hinduism: Essays on Religion in History. Yoda Press. ISBN 978-81-902272-6-1.
- Marsh, Donna (11 May 2015). Doing Business in the Middle East: A cultural and practical guide for all business professionals. Little, Brown Book Group. ISBN 978-1-4721-3567-4.
- McDaniel, June (2007). "Hinduism". In Corrigan, John (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Emotion. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-517021-4.
- Michael, Witzel (2004). "Kalash Religion (extract from 'The Ṛgvedic Religious System and its Central Asian and Hindukush Antecedents')" (PDF). In A. Griffiths; J. E. M. Houben (eds.). The Vedas: Texts, Language and Ritual. Groningen: Forsten. pp. 581–636.
- Michaels, Axel (2004). Hinduism: Past and Present. Translated by Harshav, Barbara. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08953-9.
- Michell, George (1988). The Hindu Temple: An Introduction to Its Meaning and Forms. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-53230-1.
- Monier-Williams, Sir Monier (1891). Brāhmanism and Hindūism, or, Religious Thought and Life in India: As Based on the Veda and Other Sacred Books of the Hindūs. J. Murray.
- Monier-Williams, Monier (1974). Brahmanism and Hinduism: or, Religious Thought and Life in India, as Based on the Veda and Other Sacred Books of the Hindus. Elibron Classics. Adamant Media Corporation. ISBN 978-1-4212-6531-5.
- Monier-Williams, Monier (2001) [1872]. English Sanskrit dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-206-1509-0. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 24 July 2007.
- Muesse, Mark W. (2011). The Hindu Traditions: A Concise Introduction. Fortress Press. ISBN 978-0-8006-9790-7.
- Muller, Max (1859). A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature. London: Williams and Norgate.
- Narayanan, Vasudha (2009). Hinduism. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-4358-5620-2.
- Nath, Vijay (2001). "From 'Brahmanism' to 'Hinduism': Negotiating the Myth of the Great Tradition". Social Scientist. 29 (3/4): 19–50. doi:10.2307/3518337. JSTOR 3518337.
- Nicholson, Andrew J. (2010). Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History. South Asia across the disciplines. Vol. 3. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-14986-0.
- Nicholson, Andrew (2013). Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-14987-7.
- Noble, Allen (1998). "South Asian Sacred Places". Journal of Cultural Geography. 17 (2): 1–3. doi:10.1080/08873639809478317.
- Nussbaum, Martha C. (2009). The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-03059-6.
- Olivelle, Patrick (2009). Dharma: Studies in its Semantic, Cultural and Religious History. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-3338-8.
- Osborne, E. (2005). Accessing R.E. Founders & Leaders, Buddhism, Hinduism and Sikhism Teacher's Book Mainstream. Folens.
- Pande, Govind Chandra, ed. (2006). India's Interaction with Southeast Asia. History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization, vol. 1, part 3. Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilizations. ISBN 978-8187586241.
- Parpola, Asko (2015). The Roots of Hinduism. The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-022693-0.
- Pennington, Brian K. (2005). Was Hinduism Invented?: Britons, Indians, and the Colonial Construction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516655-2.
- Phuong, Tran Ky; Lockhart, Bruce (2011). The Cham of Vietnam: History, Society and Art. NUS Press. ISBN 978-9971-69-459-3.
- Prentiss, Karen Pechilis (2014). The Embodiment of Bhakti. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-535190-3.
- Raju, P. T. (1989). Structural Depths of Indian Thought. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-1-4384-1678-6.
- Radhakrishnan, S. (1922). "The Hindu Dharma". International Journal of Ethics. 33 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1086/intejethi.33.1.2377174.
- Radhakrishnan, S.; Moore, C. A. (1967). A Source Book in Indian Philosophy. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-01958-1.
- Radhakrishnan, S. (1996). Indian Philosophy. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-563820-2.
- Ramstedt, Martin, ed. (2004). Hinduism in Modern Indonesia: A Minority Religion Between Local, National, and Global Interests. London; New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-7007-1533-6.
- Renou, Louis (1964). The Nature of Hinduism. Walker.
- Richman, Paula (1988). Women, branch stories, and religious rhetoric in a Tamil Buddhist text. Buffalo, NY: Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. ISBN 978-0-915984-90-9.
- Rinehart, Robin (2004). Contemporary Hinduism: Ritual, Culture, and Practice. ABC-CLIO.
- Rocher, Ludo (1986). The Puranas. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. ISBN 978-3-447-02522-5.
- Rocher, Ludo. "The Dharmasastra". In Flood (2003).
- "Shankara's Introduction". The Brīhād Aranyaka Upanishad. Translated by Roer, Edward. 1908.
- Samuel, Geoffrey (2008). The Origins of Yoga and Tantra: Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-69534-3.
- Samuel, Geoffrey (2010). The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
- Sargeant, Winthrop; Chapple, Christopher (1984). The Bhagavad Gita. New York: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-87395-831-8.
- Sen Gupta, Anima (1986). The Evolution of the Sāṃkhya School of Thought. South Asia Books. ISBN 978-81-215-0019-7.
- Sharma, Arvind (2000). Classical Hindu Thought: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-564441-8.
- Sharma, Arvind (2002). "On Hindu, Hindustān, Hinduism and Hindutva". Numen. 49 (1): 1–36. doi:10.1163/15685270252772759. JSTOR 3270470.
- Sharma, Arvind (2003). The Study of Hinduism. University of South Carolina Press.
- Sharma, Arvind (2011). Hinduism as a Missionary Religion. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-1-4384-3211-3.
- Sharma, Suresh K.; Sharma, Usha (2004). Cultural and Religious Heritage of India: Hinduism. Mittal Publications. ISBN 978-81-7099-956-0.
- Siemens, Herman; Roodt, Vasti (2009). Nietzsche, Power and Politics: Rethinking Nietzsche's Legacy for Political Thought. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-021733-9.
- Silverberg, James (1969). "Social Mobility in the Caste System in India: An Interdisciplinary Symposium". The American Journal of Sociology. 75 (3): 442–443. doi:10.1086/224812.
- Shukla, D. N. (1993). Vastu-Sastra: Hindu Science of Architecture. Munshiram Manoharial Publ. ISBN 978-81-215-0611-3.
- Singh, Kunj Bihari (2004) [1963]. "Manipur Vaishnavism: A Sociological Interpretation". In Rowena Robinson (ed.). Sociology of Religion in India. Themes in Indian Sociology, 3. New Delhi: Sage Publ. India. pp. 125–132. ISBN 0-7619-9781-4.
- Singh, Upinder (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century. Pearson Education India. ISBN 978-81-317-1120-0.
- Sinha, Amita (1998). "Design of Settlements in the Vaastu Shastras". Journal of Cultural Geography. 17 (2). Taylor & Francis: 27–41. doi:10.1080/08873639809478319.
- Sjoberg, Andree F. (1990). "The Dravidian Contribution to the Development of Indian Civilization: A Call for a Reassessment". Comparative Civilizations Review. 23 (23): 40–74. Article 4. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020.
- Smart, Ninian (1993). "The Formation Rather Than the Origin of a Tradition". DISKUS. 1 (1): 1. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013.
- Smelser, Neil J.; Lipset, Seymour Martin, eds. (2005). Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development. Aldine Transaction. ISBN 978-0-202-30799-2.
- Smith, Bonnie; Van De Mieroop, Marc; von Glahn, Richard; Lane, Kris (2012). Crossroads and Cultures, Combined Volume: A History of the World's Peoples. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-41017-9.
- Smith, Brian K. (1998). "Questioning Authority: Constructions and Deconstructions of Hinduism". International Journal of Hindu Studies. 2 (3): 313–339. doi:10.1007/s11407-998-0001-9. JSTOR 20106612. S2CID 144929213.
- Smith, Wilfred Cantwell (1963) [1961]. The Meaning and End of Religion. New York: Macmillan – via archive.org.
- Sontheimer, Sunther-Dietz, ed. (1989). Hinduism Reconsidered. Manohar. ISBN 8173041989.
- Sponsel, Leslie Elmer (2012). Spiritual Ecology: A Quiet Revolution. ABC-CLIO.
- Stuart-Fox, David J. (2002). Pura Besakih: Temple, religion and society in Bali. Leiden: KITLV Press. ISBN 978-9067181464.
- Sweetman, Will (2004). "The prehistory of Orientalism: Colonialism and the Textual Basis for Bartholomaus Ziegenbalg's Account of Hinduism" (PDF). New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies. 6 (2): 12–38. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2013.
- Tattwananda, Swami (n.d.). Vaisnava Sects, Saiva Sects, Mother Worship. Calcutta: Nirmalendra Bikash Sen Gupta.
- Thapar, Romila (1989). "Imagined Religious Communities? Ancient History and the Modern Search for a Hindu Identity". Modern Asian Studies. 23 (2): 209–231. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00001049. S2CID 145293468.
- Thapar, R. (1993). "Imagined Religious Communities? Ancient History and the Modem Search for a Hindu Identity". Interpreting Early India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 60–88.
- Thomas, T. (2012). Prasons, Gerald (ed.). The Growth of Religious Diversity – Vol 1: Britain from 1945 Volume 1: Traditions. Routledge.
- Thompson Platts, John (1884). A dictionary of Urdu, classical Hindī, and English. W. H. Allen & Co., Oxford University.
- Toropov, Brandon; Buckles, Luke (2011). The Complete Idiot's Guide to World Religions. Penguin.
- Truschke, Audrey (2023). "Hindu: A History". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 65 (2): 1–26. doi:10.1017/S0010417522000524. S2CID 256174694.
- Turner, Bryan S. (1996a). For Weber: Essays on the Sociology of Fate. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-0-8039-7634-4.
- Varghese, Alexander P. (2008). India: History, Religion, Vision And Contribution To The World. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. ISBN 978-81-269-0904-9.
- Viswanathan, G (2003). "Colonialism and the Construction of Hinduism". In Flood, Gavin (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism. pp. 23–44. doi:10.1002/9780470998694.ch2. ISBN 978-0-470-99869-4.
- Vivekananda, Swami (1987). Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama. ISBN 978-81-85301-75-4.
- Vivekjivandas (2010). Hinduism: An Introduction – Part 1. Ahmedabad: Swaminarayan Aksharpith. ISBN 978-81-7526-433-5.
- Walker, Benjamin (1968). The Hindu world: an encyclopaedic survey of Hinduism. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-429-62465-0.
- Werner, Karel (1998) [1977]. Yoga And Indian Philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-1609-1.
- Werner, Karel (2005). A Popular Dictionary of Hinduism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-79753-9.
- West, Barbara A. (2010). Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4381-1913-7.
- Widgery, Alban G. (January 1930). "The Principles of Hindu Ethics". International Journal of Ethics. 40 (2): 232–245. doi:10.1086/intejethi.40.2.2377977. JSTOR 2377977. S2CID 170183611.
- Wimberley, Edward T. (2009). Nested Ecology: The Place of Humans in the Ecological Hierarchy. JHU Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-9289-9.
- Witzel, Michael (1995). "Early Sanskritization: Origin and Development of the Kuru state" (PDF). Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies. 1 (4). Praeger. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 June 2007.
- Zaehner, R. C. (1992). Hindu Scriptures. Penguin Random House. ISBN 978-0-679-41078-2. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 11 April 2021.
- Zimmer, Heinrich (1951). Philosophies of India. Princeton University Press.
Web sources
[edit]- ^ "The Global Religious Landscape – Hinduism". A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Major Religious Groups. Pew Research Foundation. 18 December 2012. Archived from the original on 6 May 2013. Retrieved 31 March 2013.
- ^ "Christianity 2015: Religious Diversity and Personal Contact" (PDF). gordonconwell.edu. January 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
- ^ a b "Sanatana dharma | Hinduism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 3 May 2015. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ Monier-Williams, Monier (1988). "Sanskrit English Dictionary". sanskritdictionary.com. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
- ^ a b c d e Sanderson, Alexis (March 2016). "Tolerance, Exclusivity, Inclusivity, and Persecution in Indian Religion During the Early Mediaeval Period – Part One". Sutra Journal. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ Sanderson, Alexis (May 2016). "Tolerance, Exclusivity, Inclusivity, and Persecution in Indian Religion During the Early Mediaeval Period – Part Two". Sutra Journal. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ a b Sanderson, Alexis (July 2016). "Tolerance, Exclusivity, Inclusivity, and Persecution in Indian Religion During the Early Mediaeval Period – Part Three". Sutra Journal. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ "Hinduism". History.com. 30 September 2019. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
- ^ "Complete-Works/Volume 5/Epistles – First Series". ramakrishnavivekananda.info. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
- ^ ఏడవ అధ్యాయము – 7. వివాహ ధర్మ వర్ణనము [Chapter 7 – 7. Description of Marriage]. Archived from the original on 10 June 2020.
- ^ Smart, Ninian (2007). "Polytheism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 5 August 2011. Retrieved 5 July 2007.
- ^ Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra I.92.
- ^ "Hindu Marriage Act, 1955". Archived from the original on 5 June 2007. Retrieved 25 June 2007.
- ^ "Bhakti". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2009. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
- ^ "Puja". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2015. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
- ^ Taylor, Alan (14 January 2013). "Kumbh Mela: The Largest Gathering on Earth". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 14 November 2017.
Memmott, Mark (14 January 2013). "Biggest Gathering On Earth' Begins In India; Kumbh Mela May Draw 100 Million". NPR. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 5 April 2018. - ^ "Manu Smriti Laws of Manu" (PDF). 1.87–1.91. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2010.
- ^ V, Jayaram. "The Hindu Caste System". Hinduwebsite. Archived from the original on 2 September 2023. Retrieved 28 November 2012.
- ^ Venkataraman, Swaminathan; Deshpande, Pawan. "Hinduism: Not Cast In Caste". Hindu American Foundation. Archived from the original on 2 December 2012. Retrieved 28 November 2012.
- ^ "Gopura". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 19 August 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
- ^ "Nagara". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2015.
Further reading
[edit]- Encyclopedias
- Dalal, Roshen (2010b). Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide. New Delhi: Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-341421-6.
- Jacobsen, Knut A.; et al., eds. (2009–2015). Brill's Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Vol. 1–6. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-9004271289.
- Vol. 1: Regions, Pilgrimage, Deities (2009).
- Vol. 2: Sacred Languages, Ritual Traditions, Arts, Concepts (2010).
- Vol. 3: Society, Religious Professionals, Religious Communities, Philosophies (2011).
- Vol. 4: Historical Perspectives, Poets/Teachers/Saints, Relation to Other Religions and Traditions, Hinduism and Contemporary Issues (2012).
- Vol. 5: Symbolism, Diaspora, Modern Groups and Teachers (2013).
- Vol. 6: Indices (2015).
- Jain, Pankaj; Sherma, Rita; Khanna, Madhu, eds. (2018). "Hinduism and Tribal Religions". Swaminarayan. Encyclopedia of Indian Religions. Encyclopedia of Indian Religions. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1036-5_541-1. ISBN 978-94-024-1036-5.
- Johnson, W. J. (2009). A Dictionary of Hinduism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-861025-0.
- Jones, Constance A.; Ryan, James D. (2007). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Encyclopedia of World Religions. J. Gordon Melton, Series Editor. New York: Facts On File. ISBN 978-0-8160-5458-9. Archived from the original on 2 April 2020.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (1998). A Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism. London: Oneworld Publications. ISBN 978-1-78074-672-2.
- Potter, Karl H., ed. (1970–2019). Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophers. Vol. 1–25. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Archived from the original on 1 February 2022. Ongoing monographic series project.
- Sullivan, Bruce M. (2001). The A to Z of Hinduism (Rev. ed.). Lanham, Md; London: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 0-8108-4070-7.
- Werner, Karel (1997). A Popular Dictionary of Hinduism (Rev. ed.). Surrey: Curzon Press. ISBN 0-7007-1049-3.
- Introductory
- Flood, Gavin (1996). An Introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-43878-0. Archived from the original on 29 November 2016.
- Flood, Gavin, ed. (2003). The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-21535-2. Archived from the original on 29 March 2024. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
- Fowler, Jeaneane D. (1997). Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices. Sussex Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-898723-60-8.[permanent dead link]
- Hiltebeitel, Alf (2002) [1987]. "Hinduism". In Kitagawa, Joseph M. (ed.). The Religious Traditions of Asia: Religion, History, and Culture. London: RoutledgeCurzon. pp. 3–40. ISBN 0-7007-1762-5.
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (2007). Hinduism: A Beginner's Guide. Oneworld Publications. ISBN 978-1-78074-026-3. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020.
- Knott, Kim (1998). Hinduism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-160645-8. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020.
- History
- Chattopadhyaya, D. P. (ed.). History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization. Vol. 1–15. Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilizations.
- Basham, Arthur Llewellyn (1954). The Wonder That Was India: A Survey of the Culture of the Indian Sub-Continent Before the Coming of the Muslims. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
- Parpola, Asko (2015). The Roots of Hinduism. The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-022693-0.
- Samuel, Geoffrey (2010). The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
- Philosophy and theology
- Dasgupta, Surendranath (1922–1955). A History of Indian Philosophy. Vol. 1–5. London: Cambridge University Press. Vol. 1 | Vol. 2 | Vol. 3 | Vol. 4 | Vol. 5.
- Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli (1923–1927). Indian Philosophy. Vol. 1–2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Texts
- Klostermaier, Klaus K. (2010). A Survey of Hinduism (3rd ed.). New York: SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-8011-3.
- Richards, Glyn, ed. (1985). A Sourcebook of Modern Hinduism. Surrey: Curzon Press. ISBN 978-0-7007-0173-5.
Hinduism
View on GrokipediaHinduism, also known as Sanātana Dharma, has been called the oldest religion in the world.[1] It is an ancient Indian religion that encompasses a diverse collection of religious, philosophical, and cultural traditions indigenous to the Indian subcontinent, evolving from pre-Vedic elements from the Indus Valley Civilization (c. 2500–1500 BCE) with the Vedic religion of the Indo-Aryans around 1500–500 BCE without a single founder, centralized authority, or traditional denominations to which many adherents claim to belong.[2][3] Core concepts include the four Puruṣārthas—dharma (ethical duties and cosmic order), artha (prosperity), kāma (desires), and moksha (liberation)—alongside karma (action and its consequences) and samsara (cycle of rebirth), with Hindu texts classified into Śruti (revealed) and Smṛti (remembered), the Vedas serving as the oldest authoritative Śruti scriptures composed orally in Sanskrit during the Vedic period.[4][5] The Upanishads, the philosophical conclusion to the Vedas, delve into ultimate reality (Brahman), the self (ātman), and paths to liberation through introspective dialogues that build on Vedic rituals. Among Smṛti texts, the epics Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa vividly depict heroic deeds, divine incarnations, moral dilemmas, and devotion, profoundly influencing Hindu ethics and culture, while the Purāṇas—especially the Viṣṇu Purāṇa—elaborate cosmologies, genealogies, creation cycles, pralaya (dissolution), and Vishnu’s avatars like Krishna, guiding devotees toward divine refuge and moksha. Hindus posit Brahman as the impersonal ultimate reality underlying existence, often worshiped through a vast pantheon of deities such as Brahma the creator, Vishnu the preserver, and Shiva the destroyer, reflecting both monistic and polytheistic elements.[4][6] With approximately 1.2 billion adherents as of 2020, mostly native to the Indian subcontinent, predominantly in India and Nepal, where it forms the majority faith, Hinduism ranks as the third-largest religion globally after Christianity and Islam, influencing practices like yoga, temple worship, and festivals while historically intertwined with social structures such as the varna system.[7]
Terminology and Definitions
Etymology of "Hinduism"
The word Hindu derives from the Old Persian hinduš, a term used in Achaemenid inscriptions from the 6th century BCE to designate the region of the Indus Valley as a satrapy of the empire, ultimately tracing to the Sanskrit sindhu, meaning "river" and referring specifically to the Indus River.[8] This exogenous label, adopted by Greeks as Indoi to describe peoples east of the river, initially carried purely geographical and ethnic connotations rather than religious ones, distinguishing inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent from outsiders like Persians or Arabs, who later used variants such as al-Hind.[1] [9] Over centuries, particularly from the 8th century CE onward in Persian and Arabic texts like the Chachnama, "Hindu" evolved among Muslim rulers and chroniclers in the subcontinent to denote non-Muslim natives, acquiring proto-religious overtones as a catch-all for indigenous practices distinct from Islam, though still not a self-applied doctrinal term.[10] [11] Isolated early religious usages appear, such as Portuguese friar Sebastião Manrique's 1649 reference to "Hindu" beliefs, but widespread self-identification as "Hindu" in a confessional sense emerged only in the 19th century amid colonial encounters and reform movements.[12] The compound term Hinduism, denoting a unified religious system, is a modern English neologism formed by appending the suffix -ism—implying a coherent doctrine or ideology—to Hindu, with its earliest recorded use dating to 1786 in European scholarship to categorize the polytheistic and philosophical traditions of India.[13] It gained currency in the early 19th century through British Orientalists and Indian intellectuals, such as Raja Rammohun Roy's 1816 employment of the word to frame indigenous faiths against Christian missionary critiques, reflecting colonial efforts to systematize diverse, non-Abrahamic practices lacking a native equivalent.[1] [14] This construct, while convenient for academic taxonomy, has been critiqued for imposing artificial unity on heterogeneous traditions historically identified through scriptures like the Vedas or concepts like dharma, rather than a singular "ism." [9]Indigenous Terms: Sanātana Dharma and Vaidika Dharma
Sanātana Dharma, derived from the Sanskrit words sanātana ("eternal" or "timeless") and dharma ("law," "duty," or "cosmic order"), refers to the perennial principles and practices that govern righteous living and spiritual realization in the Hindu tradition.[15] This term underscores the view that the tradition embodies unchanging truths inherent to existence, rather than a historical invention or founder-led faith, with roots traceable to Vedic hymns invoking eternal cosmic order (ṛta).[16] Adherents employ it to highlight continuity from ancient rituals to later philosophical syntheses, positioning it as a universal framework applicable beyond cultural boundaries, though primarily preserved through Indian scriptural lineages.[17] Vaidika Dharma, or "Vedic Dharma," denotes the body of duties, rituals, and ethical norms explicitly derived from the Vedas—the oldest extant Indo-European texts, composed orally between approximately 1500 and 500 BCE.[18] It emphasizes adherence to Vedic injunctions (smṛti and śruti), including sacrificial rites, caste-based obligations (varṇāśrama-dharma), and philosophical inquiries into reality, distinguishing orthodox strands from non-Vedic or folk practices like certain Tantric traditions.[19] This term gained prominence among Brahminical scholars to affirm scriptural authority, with texts like the Manusmṛti (c. 200 BCE–200 CE) codifying Vedic-derived laws on social order and morality.[20] While often used interchangeably, Sanātana Dharma broadly encapsulates the eternal essence of Vaidika principles, extending to post-Vedic developments such as Upanishadic metaphysics and Bhakti devotionalism, whereas Vaidika Dharma strictly anchors to Vedic orthodoxy, excluding heterodox elements.[21] Both terms serve as self-designations by practitioners to convey an unbroken, revelation-based lineage predating colonial categorizations, with Sanātana evoking timeless universality and Vaidika stressing textual fidelity; historical texts like the Mahābhārata (c. 400 BCE–400 CE) implicitly align with these by portraying dharma as Vedic-sanctioned yet eternally operative.[22] This indigenous nomenclature contrasts with externally imposed labels, reflecting a meta-awareness among reformers since the 19th century that foreign constructs often misrepresented the tradition's intrinsic coherence.[16]Western and Colonial Constructions
The designation "Hinduism" as a unified religious category crystallized in the late 18th and early 19th centuries amid British colonial encounters with Indian traditions, building on earlier Persian and Mughal usages of "Hindu" primarily as a geographic or ethnic marker for non-Muslim populations east of the Indus River.[23] European Orientalists, starting with Sir William Jones's founding of the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1784, systematically studied Sanskrit texts like the Vedas and epics, framing diverse Indic practices—ranging from Vedic rituals to devotional sects—as a singular "religion" analogous to Christianity or Islam for comparative purposes.[24] Jones's translations, such as of Kalidasa's Shakuntala in 1789, highlighted aesthetic and philosophical elements while often contrasting them with perceived "degeneracy" in contemporary practices.[25] Scholars like Max Müller further advanced this textual reconstruction in the mid-19th century by editing the Rigveda (published 1849–1874) and promoting Indo-European philology, portraying ancient Vedic thought as a pinnacle of Aryan wisdom that had declined into what he viewed as idolatrous superstition among modern Hindus.[26] Müller's works, influenced by his Christian background and comparative mythology, emphasized philosophical Upanishads over popular bhakti traditions, shaping a Protestant-like image of Hinduism as scripture-centric yet polytheistic and in need of reform.[27] This Orientalist lens, while yielding scholarly insights, imposed European categories of "religion" defined by belief and dogma, sidelining Hinduism's orthopraxic emphasis on ritual, dharma, and caste-based varna systems.[28] Colonial governance amplified these constructions through administrative tools like the decennial censuses from 1872 onward, which enumerated "Hindus" as a monolithic bloc—encompassing Shaivas, Vaishnavas, Shaktas, and tribal groups—for taxation, law, and missionary strategies, despite internal diversity and pre-colonial self-identifications as followers of specific sampradayas or dharma.[29] British legal codifications, such as the 1860 Indian Penal Code and Hindu personal laws, standardized customs across regions, often privileging Brahmanical texts like Manusmriti while ignoring regional variations, to facilitate rule over a presumed unified "Hindu" subject.[30] Indian reformers like Raja Rammohan Roy, who first employed "Hinduism" in English around 1816 to defend Unitarian-like monotheism against missionary critiques, actively participated in this framing, blending indigenous revival with Western rationalism.[28] Critiques positing Hinduism as a pure "colonial invention" overlook pre-colonial evidence of collective Hindu identity, such as 16th–17th century texts like Vidyapati's works distinguishing Hindus from Turks and shared resistance to Islamic iconoclasm, as well as self-referential terms like Sanātana Dharma.[31] [32] Constructionist arguments, prevalent in postcolonial scholarship, often stem from ideological aims to deconstruct Hindu nationalism but underplay indigenous agency and continuities in scriptural authority from the Vedic period.[33] These Western impositions nonetheless endure in global perceptions, casting Hinduism as tolerant yet chaotic, and influencing modern Hindu apologetics that emphasize perennial philosophy to counter earlier derogatory portrayals.[34]Historical Origins and Evolution
Speculative Pre-Vedic Roots and Indus Valley Civilization
The Indus Valley Civilization (IVC), also known as the Harappan Civilization, flourished from approximately 3300 to 1300 BCE across northwestern Indian subcontinent, encompassing sites like Mohenjo-Daro, Harappa, Kalibangan, Lothal, Rakhigarhi, Banawali, and Dholavira, characterized by planned urban centers, standardized brick architecture, advanced drainage systems, and a script that remains undeciphered.[35] Archaeological evidence reveals no monumental temples, palaces, or clear depictions of kings, suggesting a society without centralized priestly or royal dominance akin to later Vedic structures, though small terracotta figurines and seals indicate possible ritual practices.[36] Speculation on pre-Vedic roots posits that certain IVC elements contributed to Hinduism's formation through cultural synthesis with incoming Indo-Aryan traditions around 2000–1500 BCE. Proponents, including archaeologist John Marshall, interpreted the "Pashupati" seal from Mohenjo-Daro—depicting a horned, ithyphallic figure in a yogic posture surrounded by animals—as a proto-Shiva or "Lord of Animals," linking it to later Shaivite iconography and ascetic practices.[37] Similar claims extend to female terracotta figurines as precursors to goddess worship (Shakti), swastika motifs on seals resembling Vedic symbols, and brick structures at Kalibangan interpreted as fire altars akin to Vedic yajnas.[36] These views, echoed by scholars like B.B. Lal, suggest indigenous continuity in motifs like yoga and fertility cults absorbed into Vedic religion.[38] However, such interpretations face substantial critique for over-reliance on visual analogies without textual corroboration, as the undeciphered script precludes direct linkage to Hindu concepts. The Pashupati figure's three faces and posture may represent a local deity or clan totem rather than Shiva, with no Vedic parallels in IVC's absence of horses, chariots, or iron—staples of Rigvedic descriptions.[39] Urban IVC decline by 1900 BCE preceded Vedic pastoralism, and artifacts lack explicit Vedic deities like Indra or Agni. Linguistic evidence points to a Dravidian substrate in IVC, with terms for local fauna (e.g., elephant as *pīru) influencing later Indo-Aryan, implying cultural layering rather than unbroken continuity.[40] Genetic studies reinforce discontinuity: ancient IVC genomes show Iranian farmer-related ancestry mixed with South Asian hunter-gatherers, lacking Steppe pastoralist (Indo-European) components that appear post-2000 BCE, aligning with migrations introducing Vedic Sanskrit.[35] Modern South Asians derive 25–30% ancestry from IVC-like sources, but this admixture with Steppe elements postdates IVC collapse, supporting synthesis of indigenous practices into emerging Hinduism rather than direct pre-Vedic origins.[41] Overall, while IVC likely provided substrate elements like ritual symbols, claims of proto-Hinduism remain speculative, constrained by evidential gaps and influenced by nationalist interpretations favoring indigenous origins over migration models.[42]Vedic Period (c. 1500–500 BCE)
The Vedic period, spanning approximately 1500 to 500 BCE, represents the era of Indo-Aryan settlement in the northwestern Indian subcontinent and the oral composition of the Vedas, the foundational scriptures of Hinduism. Linguistic evidence, including the archaic Sanskrit of the Rigveda sharing roots with other Indo-European languages such as Avestan and Hittite, supports the migration of Indo-Aryan pastoralists from the Pontic-Caspian steppes via Central Asia around 2000–1500 BCE.[43] Archaeological correlates include the introduction of horse-drawn chariots and spoked wheels, absent in the preceding Indus Valley Civilization but present in Andronovo culture sites linked to Indo-Iranians.[44] Genetic studies further indicate steppe-derived ancestry admixture in northern Indian populations dating to this timeframe, consistent with male-mediated migration.[45] The Rigveda, the oldest Vedic text comprising 1,028 hymns in 10 books (mandalas), is dated by scholarly consensus to 1500–1200 BCE based on astronomical references, linguistic archaisms, and comparisons with Mitanni treaties mentioning Vedic deities around 1400 BCE.[44] Subsequent Samhitas—Yajurveda, Samaveda, and Atharvaveda—followed, with the core Samhitas finalized by 1000 BCE, though transmitted orally with mnemonic techniques ensuring fidelity until written codification around 500 BCE.[46] Early Vedic society was semi-nomadic and pastoral, organized into tribes (jana) led by a rajan (chief) selected for prowess in cattle raids and warfare, advised by assemblies like sabha and samiti; family units (griha) were patriarchal, with women participating in rituals but property rights limited to kin groups.[47] Varna distinctions began emerging—priests (rishis), warriors (rajanyas), and commoners (vish)—without rigid heredity, contrasting later caste solidification.[48] Religion centered on henotheistic worship of deities embodying natural forces, with Indra invoked in over 250 Rigvedic hymns as storm god and warrior slaying the dragon Vritra to release waters, Agni as fire mediator between humans and gods, and Varuna upholding rita (cosmic order).[49] Rituals emphasized yajna (sacrificial offerings) of ghee, grains, and animals into consecrated fires, accompanied by soma (hallucinogenic plant juice) libations to induce divine favor for prosperity and victory; no temples or idols existed, as divinity was invoked through precise mantras rather than images.[49] In the later Vedic phase (c. 1000–500 BCE), expansion into the Ganges-Yamuna Doab introduced settled agriculture, iron tools by 1000 BCE, and larger kingdoms (janapadas), with Brahmanas (ritual texts) and Aranyakas elaborating sacrifices like ashvamedha (horse sacrifice) for royal sovereignty, elevating priestly authority.[50] This period laid causal foundations for dharma as ritual obligation, influencing subsequent Hindu concepts of order and reciprocity with the divine.[51]Upanishadic, Epic, and Classical Synthesis (c. 500 BCE–500 CE)
The Upanishads, a collection of over 100 philosophical texts appended to the Vedic corpus, were primarily composed between 700 BCE and 300 BCE, marking a transition from ritualistic Vedic practices to metaphysical speculation on the self and ultimate reality. These works, transmitted orally in Sanskrit, emphasize knowledge (jnana) over sacrifice, positing the identity of Atman (individual soul) with Brahman (cosmic principle) and introducing doctrines of reincarnation (samsara), action's consequences (karma), and liberation (moksha) through discernment. Principal texts like the Brihadaranyaka and Chandogya Upanishads, dating to around 700–600 BCE, feature dialogues between sages exploring these ideas. Key figures such as Yajnavalkya, an early systematizer of Upanishadic thought; Gargi Vachaknavi, a female philosopher renowned for profound metaphysical debates; and Shvetaketu, who emphasized knowledge and consciousness, exemplify this emerging philosophical inquiry.[52][53] Influencing later heterodox movements like Buddhism and Jainism while laying groundwork for Vedanta.[54][55] Parallel to Upanishadic introspection, the epic period saw the composition of the Mahabharata and Ramayana, vast narrative poems integrating Vedic lore with moral and devotional themes. The Mahabharata, exceeding 100,000 verses, likely reached its core form by 400 BCE with expansions continuing to 400 CE, recounting the Kurukshetra war between Pandavas and Kauravas as a framework for dharma (duty) amid conflict. Embedded within it, the Bhagavad Gita (c. 200 BCE) synthesizes Upanishadic philosophy with action and devotion, advising Arjuna on paths of knowledge, selfless work, and bhakti (loving surrender to Krishna as Vishnu's avatar). The Ramayana, attributed to Valmiki and composed in stages from 500 BCE to 100 BCE, narrates Rama's exile and victory over Ravana, exemplifying ideal kingship, loyalty, and righteousness (maryada purushottama). These epics democratized Vedic concepts, embedding them in accessible stories that promoted varna (social order) duties and early bhakti sentiments.[56][57] This era's classical synthesis fused Upanishadic monism, epic narratives, and pragmatic codes into a cohesive framework, evident in the emergence of the six orthodox darshanas (philosophical systems) accepting Vedic authority. Samkhya, positing 25 tattvas (principles) of dualistic prakriti (matter) and purusha (consciousness), and its allied Yoga, outlining eight limbs for discipline including meditation, were systematized by texts like the Yoga Sutras (c. 200 BCE–400 CE). Nyaya and Vaisheshika developed logic and atomistic realism for valid knowledge (pramana), while Purva Mimamsa defended ritual exegesis and Uttara Mimamsa (Vedanta) elaborated non-dualism from Upanishads. Bhakti precursors appeared in the Shvetashvatara Upanishad (c. 400–200 BCE), extolling devotion to Rudra (proto-Shiva) as a yogic path, bridging abstract Brahman with personal deity worship.[58] Smriti texts, including Dharma-shastras like the Manu Smriti (c. 200 BCE–200 CE), codified conduct, inheritance, and penalties aligned with varnashrama (caste and life-stage duties), drawing from Vedic norms but adapting to urbanizing societies post-Mauryan empire. These works, subordinate to shruti (Vedas), prescribed ashramas (student, householder, forest-dweller, renunciant) and emphasized purusharthas (dharma, artha, kama, moksha), fostering social stability amid Hellenistic and Persian influences. Early sectarian texts, such as proto-Puranas and Agamas (c. 300 BCE–500 CE), promoted temple rituals and iconography for Vishnu, Shiva, and Devi, laying foundations for theism over pure monism, though widespread temple construction intensified later. This period's innovations reflected causal adaptations to axial-age skepticism, prioritizing empirical self-inquiry and ethical realism over unexamined ritual.[59][60]Medieval Developments: Bhakti, Regional Sects, and Islamic Encounters (500–1800 CE)
The period from 500 to 1800 CE witnessed the fragmentation of centralized authority following the Gupta Empire's decline, leading to the rise of regional kingdoms in South and East India that fostered diverse Hindu traditions amid invasions from Central Asia. Bhakti, a devotional movement emphasizing personal emotional connection to deities like Vishnu, Shiva, or Shakti, gained prominence as an alternative to ritualistic Brahmanical orthodoxy, originating in Tamil Nadu with the Alvars (Vaishnava poets, c. 6th–9th centuries CE) and Nayanars (Shaiva poets, same period), whose hymns in vernacular languages democratized spiritual access. [61] This shift correlated with the growth of temple-based worship and sectarian philosophies, such as Ramanuja's Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism, 1017–1137 CE), which integrated devotion with Vedantic metaphysics to affirm Vishnu's supremacy and grace as paths to liberation, influencing Sri Vaishnavism.[62] Northern expansions included nirguna (formless) bhakti by Kabir (c. 1440–1518 CE), who critiqued idol worship and caste in dohas blending Hindu and Islamic elements while rooted in Ramananda's lineage, and Tukaram (1608–1650 CE), whose abhangas extolled Vithoba (a Krishna form) and personal surrender, amassing over 4,000 compositions that challenged social hierarchies.[63] [64] Bhakti's appeal lay in its emphasis on inner purity over external rites, evidenced by its spread across castes, though empirical records show variable implementation, with some saints like Basava (c. 1134–1196 CE) founding Lingayatism—a Shaiva sect rejecting Vedic authority and promoting equality through Shiva devotion via linga worship.[65] Regional sects proliferated under dynasties like the Cholas (9th–13th centuries CE), who endowed Shaiva and Vaishnava temples such as Brihadeeswarar (1010 CE) and supported Agamic traditions integrating tantric rituals with temple architecture.[66] Vaishnavism diversified with Gaudiya traditions under Chaitanya (1486–1534 CE), focusing on Krishna bhakti through kirtan, while Shaktism advanced in Bengal and Assam via texts like the Devi Mahatmya commentaries, emphasizing goddess worship in esoteric practices. Shaiva sects, including Pashupata and Kashmir Shaivism (c. 9th–11th centuries CE), developed monistic philosophies like Abhinavagupta's Pratyabhijnahrdayam, positing Shiva as ultimate consciousness, alongside popular Virashaiva movements in Karnataka that rejected image worship for ethical monotheism.[67] The Vijayanagara Empire (1336–1646 CE), established as a Hindu bulwark against Delhi Sultanate incursions, exemplified sectarian patronage by funding Virupaksha (Shiva) and Vittala (Vishnu) temples, reviving bhakti through scholars like Sayana (14th century CE), whose Vedic commentaries preserved ritual knowledge, and fostering Telugu literature that integrated Alvars' hymns.[68] [69] Islamic encounters began with Muhammad bin Qasim's conquest of Sindh in 712 CE, marking initial Arab incursions that imposed jizya on non-Muslims and targeted infidel idols, as recorded in Chachnama chronicles. Mahmud of Ghazni's 17 raids (1001–1026 CE) destroyed over 10 major temples, including Somnath in 1026 CE, where 50,000 defenders were slain and idols smashed for caliphal prestige, per contemporary Persian accounts like Utbi's Tarikh-i-Yamini.[70] The Ghurid victory at Tarain (1192 CE) enabled the Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 CE), under rulers like Alauddin Khalji and the Tughlaqs, who demolished temples such as those at Mathura and Varanasi for mosques, with over 80 documented destructions by 1398 CE under Timur's sack of Delhi, which killed 100,000 Hindus.[71] Mughal emperors varied: Akbar (1556–1605 CE) suspended jizya and hosted Ibadat Khana debates, yet Babur and Aurangzeb (1658–1707 CE) reimposed taxes and razed temples like the Kashi Vishwanath (1669 CE) and Mathura Keshav Dev (1670 CE), funding 300+ mosque conversions amid forced conversions estimated in lakhs during famines and wars, as noted in Maasir-i-Alamgiri.[70] Hindu resistance persisted via Rajput alliances, Vijayanagara's defeats of Bahmani sultans (e.g., Talikota 1565 CE notwithstanding), Maratha expansions under Shivaji (1674 CE coronation), and Sikh militarization under Guru Gobind Singh (1699 CE Khalsa), preserving Hindu polities in Deccan and Punjab.[72] These interactions spurred bhakti's inward turn and sectarian consolidation, with limited syncretism in figures like Kabir, but causal evidence points to patronage withdrawal and iconoclasm disrupting northern temple economies, evidenced by archaeological shifts in urban decline post-1200 CE.[73]Colonial Reforms and Nationalist Responses (1800–1947)
British colonial authorities, facing evangelical pressures to civilize Indian society, targeted Hindu customs perceived as inhumane, enacting the Bengal Sati Regulation of December 1829 under Governor-General Lord William Bentinck, which criminalized the practice of sati—widow immolation on a husband's pyre—despite opposition from orthodox Hindus who viewed it as sanctioned by tradition.[74] This reform, supported domestically by Raja Rammohan Roy's campaigns against the practice as un-Vedic and coercive, marked an early intervention blending Western moralism with selective Hindu critique, though enforcement faced resistance and sati persisted sporadically in princely states.[75] Subsequent laws addressed female infanticide, human sacrifice, and child marriage, culminating in the Age of Consent Act of 1891 raising the marriage age for girls to 12, often justified by British narratives of Hindu degeneracy to legitimize rule.[76] Hindu intellectuals responded with reformist organizations to purge accretions, assert scriptural authority, and counter Christian missionary conversions, which accelerated post-1813 Charter Act allowing proselytization. Rammohan Roy, a Bengali scholar influenced by Islamic unitarianism and Enlightenment ideas, established the Brahmo Samaj in 1828 to advocate monotheism derived from the Upanishads, reject idol worship and caste rigidity, and promote widow remarriage and women's education, influencing the Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act of 1856 championed by Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar through scriptural exegesis permitting remarriage for child widows.[77] The Prarthana Samaj, founded in 1867 in Maharashtra by Atmaram Pandurang, echoed these rationalist reforms with emphasis on devotion and social uplift, while Swami Dayananda Saraswati's Arya Samaj, launched in 1875, rigorously advocated a return to Vedic monotheism, denounced Puranic polytheism and image worship as corruptions, and introduced shuddhi rituals to reconvert Muslims and Christians, amassing over 100 branches by 1890 to foster Hindu solidarity.[78] Nationalist sentiments intertwined with revivalism as colonial policies, including divide-and-rule tactics favoring Muslims, spurred assertions of Hindu cultural primacy. Swami Vivekananda, successor to mystic Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, galvanized global appreciation for Vedantic non-dualism at the 1893 Parliament of the World's Religions in Chicago, portraying Hinduism as tolerant and scientific to combat denigrations, and founded the Ramakrishna Mission in 1897 to blend spiritual discipline with social service like famine relief and education, emphasizing national regeneration through inner strength rather than blind imitation of the West.[79] By the early 20th century, political Hinduism emerged via the Hindu Mahasabha in 1915, advocating protection of Hindu rights amid Khilafat and Non-Cooperation movements, while V.D. Savarkar's 1923 Essentials of Hindutva defined Hindus as those viewing India as both fatherland and holy land, prioritizing cultural continuity over mere territorial loyalty and critiquing syncretic dilutions.[80] Mahatma Gandhi, drawing on Vaishnava ethics, integrated ahimsa and satyagraha into anti-colonial resistance from 1919 onward, invoking Ram Rajya as an ideal polity, though his ecumenism clashed with revivalists over cow protection and temple entry, contributing to polarized communal dynamics culminating in the 1947 Partition amid demands for Hindu-majority safeguards.[81] These movements, blending defensive orthodoxy with modernist adaptations, fortified Hindu identity against erosion, with Arya Samaj schools educating thousands and shuddhi reclaiming an estimated 100,000 by 1920s, yet faced internal schisms and external suppression under British sedition laws post-1857 Revolt.[82]Post-Independence Revival and Contemporary Dynamics (1947–Present)
Following India's independence in 1947 and the partition along religious lines, which created a Hindu-majority republic amid communal violence displacing millions, Hinduism experienced institutional reforms under the secular framework of the Constitution adopted in 1950.[83] The Hindu Code Bills, enacted between 1955 and 1956, codified personal laws governing marriage, divorce, adoption, succession, and guardianship for Hindus, abolishing practices like polygamy and granting women inheritance rights, though they faced opposition from conservative groups for interfering in dharmic traditions.[84] [85] These reforms, driven by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Law Minister B.R. Ambedkar, aimed to modernize Hindu society but were criticized by figures like Rajendra Prasad for prioritizing uniformity over customary diversity.[86] In the ensuing decades, Hindu organizations such as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), founded in 1925 but expanding post-partition, promoted cultural revival through shakhas and service activities, emphasizing Hindu unity against perceived threats from separatism and evangelism.[87] The Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), established in 1964, mobilized for temple restorations and anti-conversion efforts, culminating in the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid structure in Ayodhya, which galvanized Hindu political assertion despite international condemnation.[88] This momentum propelled the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), formed in 1980 as a successor to the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, to national power in 1998 under Atal Bihari Vajpayee and again in 2014 under Narendra Modi, whose governance advanced Hindutva-aligned policies like the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, revoking Jammu and Kashmir's special status.[89] [90] A landmark in this revival was the Supreme Court's 2019 ruling permitting the construction of the Ram Mandir at Ayodhya on the site believed to be Lord Rama's birthplace, with the temple's pran pratishtha (consecration) performed on January 22, 2024, by Prime Minister Modi, drawing millions of pilgrims and symbolizing reclaimed sacred space after centuries of dispute.[91] [92] Contemporary dynamics include state-level anti-conversion laws in over a dozen provinces since the 1960s, intensified post-2014 to curb allegedly coercive proselytization by Christian and Islamic groups, amid data showing Hindu population share declining from 84.1% in 1951 to 79.8% in 2011 due to differential fertility rates.[93] These measures, supported by BJP governments, face accusations of majoritarianism from secular critics but are defended as protecting indigenous traditions against historical demographic shifts.[94] Globally, Hinduism expanded via the diaspora, with Hindu migrants in North America surging from 0.8 million in 1990 to 3.0 million by 2020, fostering temples and festivals in the US, UK, and Canada.[95] The International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), founded in 1966 in New York by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, proliferated to over 600 centers worldwide, promoting bhakti through chanting and vegetarianism, though it encountered countercultural associations and internal schisms post-1977.[96] [97] Yoga's commodification as wellness practice, detached from ritual roots, generated a $80 billion industry by 2023, while debates persist over secularism's erosion of temple autonomy and rising temple-mosque litigation surveys identifying 3,000 disputed sites.[98] These trends reflect Hinduism's adaptation to modernity, balancing revivalist assertion with pluralism under a constitution privileging equality yet permitting religious personal laws.[99]Scriptural Corpus
Primacy of the Vedas and Vedanga
The Vedas constitute the foundational scriptures of Hinduism, regarded as shruti—texts directly revealed to ancient sages through divine auditory perception, distinguishing them from later smriti compositions remembered and authored by humans.[100] This status confers upon them unparalleled authority in orthodox Hindu traditions, where acceptance of the Vedas delineates āstika schools from heterodox nāstika ones like Buddhism and Jainism.[101] Composed orally in Vedic Sanskrit, the four principal Vedas—Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samaveda, and Atharvaveda—encompass hymns, rituals, melodies, and incantations, with the Rigveda containing 1,028 hymns attributed to over 400 seers.[102] Scholarly estimates place the initial composition of the Vedic corpus between approximately 1500 BCE and 500 BCE, beginning with the Rigveda around 1500–1200 BCE, followed by the others, though oral transmission predates written manuscripts by millennia to ensure phonetic fidelity.[102] The Vedas' primacy extends to their role as the eternal (sanātana) source of dharma, cosmology, and philosophy, influencing all subsequent Hindu texts, which derive legitimacy through alignment with Vedic injunctions rather than independent authority.[103] Complementing the Vedas are the Vedāṅga, the six auxiliary disciplines essential for their proper study, recitation, and application, metaphorically termed the "limbs" (aṅga) of the Vedic body.[104] These include śikṣā (phonetics and pronunciation to preserve oral integrity), chandas (prosody for metrical structure), vyākaraṇa (grammar for linguistic precision), nirukta (etymology for semantic interpretation), kalpa (ritual canons for sacrificial procedures), and jyotiṣa (astronomy and calendrics for timing observances).[105] Developed between 1000 BCE and 500 BCE, the Vedāṅga ensure the Vedas' accessibility and ritual efficacy, with texts like Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyāyī in vyākaraṇa standardizing Sanskrit and Yāska's Nirukta elucidating archaic terms.[100] Without mastery of these limbs, Vedic comprehension remains incomplete, underscoring their integral role in sustaining the scriptures' orthodoxy and practical utility.[106]Itihasa: Ramayana and Mahabharata
Itihasa, meaning "thus it happened" in Sanskrit, refers to the historical narratives in Hinduism comprising the epics Ramayana and Mahabharata, which convey moral and philosophical teachings through accounts of past events.[107] These texts are distinguished from the Vedas as they present stories embedded with dharma (duty), serving as accessible vehicles for Hindu ethical instruction.[108] The Ramayana, attributed to the sage Valmiki, narrates the life of Prince Rama, an incarnation of Vishnu, focusing on his adherence to righteousness amid trials.[109] Composed in Sanskrit verse, it spans approximately 24,000 shlokas divided into seven kandas: Bala (childhood), Ayodhya (exile preparation), Aranya (forest life and Sita's abduction by Ravana), Kishkindha (alliance with Sugriva), Sundara (Hanuman's exploits), Yuddha (war against Ravana), and Uttara (post-victory events).[110] The core narrative recounts Rama's 14-year exile, the kidnapping of his wife Sita by the demon king Ravana of Lanka, and Rama's alliance with monkey armies led by Hanuman to rescue her, culminating in Ravana's defeat. Scholars estimate its composition between the 7th and 4th centuries BCE, with earlier oral traditions possibly dating to 1500 BCE.[109] The Mahabharata, ascribed to Vyasa, is the longer epic, exceeding 100,000 shlokas across 18 parvas, encompassing genealogies, myths, and the central Kurukshetra war between the Pandavas and Kauravas.[111] Its structure includes the Bhagavad Gita, a dialogue on duty and devotion embedded in the Bhishma Parva, where Krishna advises Arjuna on righteous action. The plot traces the rivalry between the five Pandava brothers and their 100 Kaurava cousins over the throne of Hastinapura, leading to an 18-day battle that nearly annihilates the Kuru lineage. Critical scholarship places the core text's formation around 400 BCE, with expansions continuing until 400 CE.[111] Both epics integrate historical elements with didactic content, influencing Hindu conceptions of kingship, family, and cosmic order, though archaeological corroboration remains limited and debated.[112]Puranas, Smritis, and Sectarian Texts
The Puranas constitute a vast corpus of encyclopedic Sanskrit texts that narrate cosmology, mythology, genealogy, and moral teachings, serving as vehicles for disseminating Hindu lore to the masses beyond the esoteric Vedas. Traditionally enumerated as 18 principal Mahapuranas—such as the Vishnu, Shiva, and Bhagavata Puranas—and an equal number of secondary Upapuranas, these works classify into categories based on the gunas (qualities): sattva-oriented (Vaishnava-leaning, e.g., Vishnu Purana), rajas (Brahma-centric), and tamas (Shaiva-focused, e.g., Shiva Purana). Their composition occurred over centuries, with core layers dating from approximately the 3rd to 10th century CE, though interpolations continued into the medieval period, reflecting evolving sectarian emphases and regional adaptations.[113][114] Contents encompass creation myths (e.g., cycles of yugas and kalpas), divine incarnations, royal lineages from solar and lunar dynasties, rituals including temple worship and festivals, and didactic narratives on dharma, often blending historical kernels with legendary embellishments. Unlike the apaurusheya (authorless) Shruti, Puranas are smriti-derived, attributed to sages like Vyasa in tradition but redacted by multiple hands, which introduces variability and potential anachronisms, such as post-Gupta era astronomical references. They popularized bhakti devotion and iconography, influencing vernacular retellings and caste norms, yet their authority remains subordinate to Vedic injunctions in orthodox Smarta traditions.[115][113] Smritis, or "remembered" texts, form the applied interpretive layer of Hindu jurisprudence and conduct, deriving from Vedic principles but authored by human sages, thus permitting contextual adaptation unlike immutable Shruti. Key examples include Dharma Shastras like the Manusmriti (c. 200 BCE–200 CE), which codifies varna duties, inheritance, and penances, alongside Grihya Sutras on domestic rites and epics as narrative smritis (though Itihasas are distinct). They address three domains: achara (ethical conduct), vyavahara (civil and criminal law), and prayashchitta (atonement for infractions), historically shaping Hindu social order, family law, and royal governance until colonial codification.[116][117] Sectarian texts, primarily Agamas and Tantras, embody devotional and ritual prescriptions tailored to specific deity cults, emerging prominently from the 5th–10th centuries CE amid bhakti's rise. Vaishnava Agamas (e.g., Pancharatra texts) emphasize Vishnu worship, temple architecture (e.g., Dravidian style), and avatar-centric theology, numbering around 108 principal works. Shaiva Agamas (e.g., Shaiva Siddhanta corpus) focus on Shiva as supreme, detailing linga rituals, initiation (diksha), and non-dual philosophy, with traditions like Kashmir Shaivism drawing from texts such as the Malinivijayottara Tantra. Shakta texts, often Tantric (e.g., Kaula traditions), center on Shakti as dynamic power, prescribing esoteric practices like mantra and yantra for 64 Bhairava Tantras, though their numbers are traditionally vast (up to 100,000 tantras cited). These texts prioritize experiential realization over Vedic orthodoxy, fostering temple-centric sects while occasionally syncretizing with Puranic narratives.[118][119]Philosophical Darshanas and Commentarial Traditions
The six orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, known as the darshanas (Sanskrit for "visions" or "perspectives"), represent systematic frameworks that accept the authority of the Vedas while addressing epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, and soteriology through aphoristic sutras and subsequent commentaries. These schools—Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Purva Mimamsa, and Vedanta—emerged between approximately 600 BCE and 500 CE, with their foundational texts compiling oral traditions into structured treatises to resolve debates on reality, knowledge, and liberation. [120] [121] They pair logically: Nyaya and Vaisheshika focus on logic and atomic realism; Samkhya and Yoga on dualistic cosmology and practical discipline; Purva Mimamsa and Vedanta on ritual exegesis and ultimate knowledge, respectively. Unlike heterodox schools such as Buddhism or Jainism, which reject Vedic infallibility, these darshanas integrate Vedic revelation as a pramana (valid means of knowledge), emphasizing inference, perception, and testimony. [122] Nyaya, attributed to sage Gautama and codified in the Nyaya Sutras around the 2nd century BCE, prioritizes epistemology and logic, defining four pramanas—perception, inference, comparison, and testimony—to combat error and achieve valid cognition leading to moksha (liberation). [121] Vaisheshika, founded by Kanada Kashyapa with sutras dated to the 6th–2nd century BCE, complements Nyaya by positing a realist ontology of six padarthas (categories): substance, quality, action, generality, particularity, and inherence, including atomic theory where eternal atoms combine to form the perceived world under divine supervision. [121] Their eventual synthesis in medieval texts like the Nyaya-Vaisheshika works underscores a theistic atomism rejecting monism. [123] Samkhya, traced to Kapila (pre-500 BCE, systematized in Ishvara Krishna's Samkhya Karikas around 4th century CE), posits an atheistic dualism between purusha (pure consciousness) and prakriti (primordial matter with three gunas: sattva, rajas, tamas), where evolution through 25 tattvas (principles) explains suffering as imbalance, remedied by discriminative knowledge. [121] Yoga, building on Samkhya via Patanjali's Yoga Sutras (circa 400 CE), introduces theistic practice through the eight limbs (ashtanga)—yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dharana, dhyana, samadhi—to still mental fluctuations (chitta vritti) and unite with Ishvara (a special purusha), emphasizing empirical self-observation over mere theory. [121] Purva Mimamsa, from Jaimini's Mimamsa Sutras (circa 200 BCE), defends Vedic rituals (karma-kanda) as eternally enjoined duties yielding apurva (latent potency) for heavenly fruits, interpreting Vedic injunctions linguistically to uphold dharma against skepticism. [120] Vedanta, or Uttara Mimamsa, interprets the Upanishads and Badarayana's Brahma Sutras (circa 200 BCE–200 CE) for jnana-kanda, focusing on brahman (ultimate reality) and atman (self), with diverse sub-schools arising from commentaries. [120] Commentarial traditions amplified these darshanas, particularly Vedanta, through bhashyas (exegeses) resolving ambiguities in sutras via dialectic. Adi Shankara (c. 788–820 CE) established Advaita (non-dualism), arguing in his Brahma Sutra Bhashya that brahman alone is real, with the world as illusory maya superimposition on atman, substantiated by shruti texts like "tat tvam asi" (thou art that). [124] Ramanuja (1017–1137 CE) propounded Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism) in his Sri Bhashya, viewing brahman as Vishnu-qualified by inseparable souls and matter, critiquing Shankara's illusionism as undermining devotion and Vedic theism. [125] Madhva (1238–1317 CE) advanced Dvaita (dualism) in his commentaries, asserting fivefold eternal differences—between God (Vishnu), souls, matter, time, and modes—positing direct realism and bhakti as paths to grace-dependent liberation, rejecting monistic identity. [126] These rival interpretations, spanning 8th–13th centuries, fueled sectarian debates while unifying under Vedic orthodoxy, with later syntheses like Vallabha's Shuddhadvaita (pure non-dualism) and Nimbarka's Dvaitadvaita (dualistic non-dualism) enriching the tradition. [127]Philosophical and Theological Foundations
Purusharthas as Life Goals
The purusharthas constitute the four foundational objectives of human existence in Hindu philosophy, comprising dharma (righteous conduct and moral order), artha (material prosperity and security), kama (fulfillment of desires and sensory pleasures), and moksha (spiritual liberation from the cycle of rebirth).[128][129] These aims provide a structured framework for balancing worldly duties with ultimate transcendence, originating in post-Vedic texts such as the Dharmashastras and elaborated in epics like the Mahabharata.[130][131] Dharma, the primary purushartha, encompasses ethical obligations, social harmony, and alignment with cosmic law (ṛta), guiding individual and communal actions to prevent chaos and ensure sustainability.[128] It prioritizes duties based on varna (social class) and ashrama (life stage), such as a householder's responsibility to family and society, as outlined in texts like the Manusmriti, which dates to approximately 200 BCE–200 CE.[129] Without dharma regulating the other pursuits, artha and kama risk devolving into exploitation or excess, as noted in classical commentaries emphasizing its role as the foundational restraint.[130] Artha focuses on acquiring wealth, power, and resources necessary for self-preservation and societal contribution, recognized as essential for fulfilling dharma in the material realm.[128] Ancient treatises like the Arthashastra, attributed to Kautilya around 300 BCE, systematize artha as statecraft and economics, underscoring its legitimacy when subordinated to ethical norms rather than pursued as an end in itself.[131] Similarly, kama addresses legitimate sensual enjoyment, aesthetic appreciation, and procreation, detailed in the Kamasutra (c. 400 BCE–200 CE) as moderated desires that enhance life without overriding moral constraints.[128] Both artha and kama are deemed worldly (preyas) goals, vital for human flourishing but transient compared to enduring truth (shreyas).[129] Moksha, the paramount purushartha, signifies emancipation from samsara (the wheel of birth, death, and karma-driven rebirth) through realization of the self's unity with Brahman, as expounded in Upanishadic literature from around 800–200 BCE.[128] Unlike the triad of dharma, artha, and kama—which early Vedic Samhitas and Brahmanas primarily emphasize for ritual and social order—moksha emerges prominently in later soteriological developments, positioning it as the ultimate aim transcending empirical pursuits.[130] Hindu thinkers, including those in the Bhagavad Gita (c. 200 BCE–200 CE), advocate sequential integration: artha and kama sustain dharma in the grihastha (householder) phase, paving the way for moksha in later stages like sannyasa (renunciation).[131] This hierarchy reflects causal realism, wherein unbridled worldly goals perpetuate bondage, while disciplined pursuit culminates in liberation, a view corroborated across orthodox darshanas like Vedanta.[129]Karma, Samsara, and Moksha
Karma denotes action and its inevitable consequences, originally referring to ritual sacrifices in the Vedic corpus around 1500–500 BCE, without explicit ties to moral causation or rebirth. The ethical dimension, positing that intentional deeds generate results (phala) that bind the soul to future existences, developed in the Upanishads, as in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (c. 700 BCE), where Yajnavalkya identifies karma alongside desire and ignorance as causes of worldly diversity and rebirth.[132][133] Samsara describes the perpetual cycle of birth (janma), death, and reincarnation (punarjanma), propelled by accumulated karma, which determines the form and circumstances of each life—ranging from human to animal or divine states based on merit. This transmigratory process, absent in early Vedic hymns focused on this-worldly rites, gained prominence in Upanishadic thought as an explanation for suffering and inequality, with the soul (atman) migrating through bodies until karmic residues dissipate.[134][135] Moksha constitutes release from samsara, severing the chain of karma through realization of the self's unity with Brahman or devotion to the divine, as elaborated in texts like the Bhagavad Gita (c. 200 BCE–200 CE), which prescribes paths such as jnana (knowledge), bhakti (devotion), and karma yoga (selfless action) to attain this liberation while navigating inescapable duties. In non-dualistic schools like Advaita Vedanta, moksha is immediate upon discerning the illusory nature of individuality; dualistic traditions emphasize eternal communion with a personal deity. Empirical observance of these doctrines appears in Hindu practices, such as ascetic renunciation to burn off karma, though critics note the absence of direct Vedic attestation for rebirth, suggesting post-Vedic elaboration influenced by pre-Aryan substrates or philosophical refinement.[136][137][132]Conceptions of the Divine: Polytheism, Henotheism, and Non-Dualism
Hindu conceptions of the divine manifest in layered frameworks, ranging from the veneration of distinct deities in ritual and devotional contexts to philosophical assertions of an underlying unity or non-duality. These views emerge from scriptural sources like the Vedas, Upanishads, and later commentaries, reflecting historical evolution from ritualistic practices around 1500 BCE to abstract metaphysics by the early centuries CE. While popular observance often emphasizes personalized gods with anthropomorphic forms and narratives, philosophical schools interpret these as provisional manifestations of a singular reality, challenging simplistic categorizations as mere polytheism.[138] Polytheism appears prominently in Hindu worship through a vast pantheon, where deities embody cosmic functions and receive offerings in temples and homes. Central figures include the Trimurti—Brahma as creator, Vishnu as preserver (manifesting in avatars like Rama and Krishna to restore dharma), and Shiva as destroyer and transformer—alongside goddesses like Devi (in forms such as Durga or Kali) representing primal energy (shakti). Sectarian traditions amplify this: Vaishnavism elevates Vishnu and his incarnations as paramount, Shaivism centers Shiva's ascetic and regenerative aspects, and Shaktism focuses on the divine feminine. Certain traditions within these sects exhibit monotheistic elements, emphasizing one supreme deity as the ultimate God, with other gods regarded as manifestations, aspects, or subordinate forms thereof. Reform movements, such as the Arya Samaj founded in the 19th century, advocate a Vedic monotheism that rejects polytheistic idol worship in favor of a singular, formless divine principle derived from the Rig Veda. Yet, even within sects, other gods are not rejected but integrated as subordinate or complementary, as seen in temple iconography depicting multiple deities. This multiplicity aligns with empirical observations of Hindu rituals, where families invoke Ganesha for obstacles, Lakshmi for prosperity, and Hanuman for strength, without mutual exclusivity.[139][138][140] Henotheism characterizes early Vedic hymns, where a chosen deity is exalted as supreme for the hymn's purpose, without denying others' existence or power—a dynamic termed kathenotheism by some scholars for its contextual supremacy shifts. Composed circa 1500–1200 BCE, the Rig Veda exemplifies this: Hymn 1.1 praises Agni as the foremost among gods, invoked first in sacrifices for mediating divine favor; Hymn 2.12 hails Indra as the "highest" slayer of foes like Vritra, granting rains and victories; while Hymn 10.125 elevates Vak (speech) as the creator encompassing all. Such passages reflect ritual priorities over ontological hierarchy, with over 33 principal deities (devas) invoked across 1,028 hymns, each temporarily sovereign. This approach, distinct from strict monotheism, accommodates polyvalent causality in natural and cosmic events, as Vedic seers observed fire's ubiquity (Agni) or storms' might (Indra) without positing a singular creator. Later texts like the Puranas retain echoes, allowing devotees to focus on one ishta-devata (chosen deity) amid acknowledged plurality.[141][142] Non-dualism, or advaita, posits Brahman as the sole, unchanging reality—impersonal, infinite, and beyond duality of subject-object or creator-creation—articulated in the Upanishads (circa 800–200 BCE) and systematized in Advaita Vedanta by Adi Shankara (c. 788–820 CE). Brahman, described as sat-chit-ananda (existence-consciousness-bliss), underlies all phenomena; the individual self (atman) is not separate but identical to it, with perceived diversity arising from ignorance (avidya) and illusion (maya). Key texts like the Chandogya Upanishad (6.8.7) declare "Tat tvam asi" ("You are that"), equating atman with Brahman through meditative realization. Shankara's commentaries on the Brahma Sutras, Bhagavad Gita, and Upanishads refute dualistic rivals (e.g., qualified non-dualism in Ramanuja's Vishishtadvaita, c. 1017–1137 CE) by arguing multiplicity's empirical basis dissolves under scrutiny: effects (world) reduce to cause (Brahman) without remainder, akin to clay pots being mere forms of clay. This view prioritizes direct experiential knowledge (jnana) over ritual, influencing monastic orders like the Dashanami Sampradaya founded by Shankara, though contested by theistic schools emphasizing personal devotion (bhakti) to saguna (qualified) forms of the divine. Empirical critiques note Advaita's abstractness contrasts with observable devotional polytheism, yet its causal logic—that apparent separations stem from perceptual limits—aligns with first-principles reduction in ontology.[143][144]Astika and Nastika Schools: Unity in Diversity
The āstika schools of Indian philosophy, central to Hinduism, are defined by their acceptance of the Vedas as authoritative and divinely revealed texts, providing a foundational orthodoxy that integrates diverse epistemological and metaphysical approaches. These traditions emphasize systematic inquiry into reality, ethics, and liberation, with unity achieved through shared commitment to Vedic sanction despite interpretive variations. In contrast, nāstika schools reject Vedic authority, prioritizing independent rationalism or empirical observation, yet they arose within the same Indic cultural context, contributing to a broader landscape of intellectual pluralism.[145][146] The six principal āstika darśanas, or philosophical systems, are Nyāya, Vaiśeṣika, Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Pūrva Mīmāṃsā, and Vedānta. Nyāya focuses on logic, inference, and debate as means to valid knowledge (pramāṇa), developing formal syllogisms to refute error and establish truth, as systematized in Gautama's Nyāya Sūtras around the 2nd century BCE. Vaiśeṣika, attributed to Kaṇāda (circa 6th–2nd century BCE), analyzes reality into categories like substance, quality, and action, positing atomism to explain the material world while affirming a theistic framework. Sāṃkhya, traced to Kapila (pre-Common Era), posits a dualism between puruṣa (consciousness) and prakṛti (matter), enumerating 25 tattvas (principles) to account for evolution and suffering without a creator deity in its classical form. Yoga, building on Sāṃkhya through Patañjali's Yoga Sūtras (circa 2nd–4th century CE), prescribes meditative disciplines and ethical restraints (yamas and niyamas) for isolating puruṣa from prakṛti, achieving kaivalya (isolation). Pūrva Mīmāṃsā, founded by Jaimini (circa 3rd–1st century BCE), defends Vedic ritualism (karma-kāṇḍa), interpreting hymns as eternal and self-validating to uphold dharma through yajña. Vedānta, or Uttara Mīmāṃsā, expounded in Bādarāyaṇa's Brahma Sūtras (circa 400 BCE–200 CE), explores the Upaniṣads' non-dual Brahman, with sub-schools like Advaita (non-dualism) by Śaṅkara (8th century CE) asserting ultimate reality as undifferentiated consciousness. These systems interlink—e.g., Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika merge realism and logic, Sāṃkhya-Yoga dualism and practice—fostering synthesis rather than rivalry, as seen in medieval commentaries integrating them under Vedic hermeneutics.[120][122][123] Nāstika traditions, deemed heterodox by āstika standards, deny the Vedas' infallibility and often Vedic ritual, favoring direct perception or ethical empiricism. Buddhism, originating with Siddhārtha Gautama (circa 5th–4th century BCE), teaches the Four Noble Truths and Eightfold Path to end duḥkha via nirvāṇa, rejecting a permanent self (anātman) and Vedic gods' salvific role. Jainism, formalized by Mahāvīra (circa 6th century BCE), stresses non-violence (ahiṃsā), asceticism, and karma as subtle matter, with souls (jīva) achieving liberation through right knowledge, faith, and conduct, independent of Vedic sacrifice. Cārvāka (Lokayata), a materialist school from circa 6th century BCE texts like the Bṛhaspati Sūtra, limits knowledge to perception, denies afterlife and soul, attributing consciousness to bodily elements and critiquing Vedic orthodoxy as priestly invention for gain. Other nāstika currents like Ājīvika (founded by Makkhali Gosāla, circa 5th century BCE) emphasized fatalism and asceticism. Though distinct from Hinduism—nāstika paths do not invoke Vedic sanction—they coexisted in ancient India, influencing debates on epistemology and ethics without absorbing into āstika frameworks.[145][147][148] This astika-nastika divide underscores Hinduism's internal diversity—āstika darśanas vary from theistic realism to non-dual monism—yet achieves unity via Vedic epistemology, which validates plural paths to mokṣa while marginalizing nāstika rejection of revelation. Shared Indic motifs like karma's causal chain and cyclical existence (saṃsāra) transcend the schism, enabling historical dialogue, such as Buddhist critiques prompting Vedānta refinements or Jain ethics reinforcing Hindu ahiṃsā. Empirical records from texts like the Mahābhārata (circa 400 BCE–400 CE) depict philosophical disputations among sages, reflecting causal realism in knowledge pursuit over dogmatic exclusion, with āstika dominance sustained by institutional continuity in brāhmaṇa traditions. Such pluralism, rooted in first-principles validation of experience and inference, distinguishes Hindu thought's resilience amid diversity.[123][148][149]Ritual and Devotional Practices
Yajna and Vaidic Sacrifices
Yajna constitutes the core ritual practice of the Vedic religion, involving precise offerings—such as clarified butter (ghee), grains, milk, Soma juice, or animals—poured into a consecrated fire (Agni) as a medium to convey oblations to deities, thereby securing reciprocity in the form of boons like prosperity, rainfall, or victory.[150][151] The term derives from the Sanskrit root yaj, denoting worship, reverence, or sacrificial offering, and these rites are detailed across Vedic texts, including the Rigveda (composed orally circa 1500–1200 BCE) and Yajurveda, which prescribe hymns and procedures to uphold ṛta, the cosmic order.[152][153] Archaeological traces of fire altars at sites like Kalibangan and Lothal in the Indus Valley (circa 2500–1900 BCE) suggest possible precursors to Vedic practices, though direct linkage remains interpretive due to the primarily textual basis of Vedic yajna.[154] Vedic yajnas demand specialized priests known as ṛtvijas, divided into four primary roles to ensure ritual efficacy: the hotṛ recites invocations from the Rigveda to summon deities; the adhvaryu executes physical actions, such as altar construction and oblation pouring, guided by Yajurveda formulas; the udgātṛ chants melodies from the Samaveda; and the brahman oversees proceedings, correcting errors and invoking Atharvaveda knowledge for wholeness.[155][153] Procedures follow Shrauta Sutras, involving preparatory phases like erecting geometric altars per Shulba Sutras (e.g., falcon-shaped for Agnicayana), kindling three fires (gārhapatya for household, āhavanīya for offerings, dakṣiṇāgni for fees), and sequential acts of pressing Soma or immolating victims amid mantra recitation, often spanning days or years for grand rites.[156] Shrauta yajnas, the grand public sacrifices codified in Shrauta texts, classify into categories like pāka (simple food offerings), havy (cake or milk to gods), pashu (animal immolation), and soma (elaborate Soma pressing with feasting); examples include the daily agnihotra for fire maintenance, bi-monthly darśapūrṇamāsa for lunar phases, royal aśvamedha (horse sacrifice asserting sovereignty, involving a year-long roaming stallion before immolation), and extended sattras lasting up to 12 years.[157][158] These differ from Grihya household rites, which adapt yajna principles to domestic scales without multiple priests.[157] Through yajna, participants enacted a contractual exchange with devas, reinforcing social hierarchy via priestly fees (dakṣiṇā) and royal patronage, while textual emphasis on precision underscores causal links between ritual fidelity and worldly outcomes, as deviations risked cosmic disruption.[151] In post-Vedic evolution, animal elements waned, yielding to symbolic homam in temple worship, yet Vedic forms persisted among Brahmanical lineages into the classical period.[158][151]Puja, Bhakti, and Temple Worship
Puja forms the foundational ritual of Hindu worship, entailing acts of reverence toward deities via invocations, prayers, songs, and symbolic offerings to cultivate divine presence.[159] Conducted individually at household altars or collectively in temples, it treats the deity's image (murti) as a conduit for cosmic energy, not the deity's literal form, emphasizing spiritual intent over material perfection.[159] Core components sequence hospitality-like gestures: purification of the site and murti, invocation (avahana) to attract the deity, ritual bathing (abhisheka), adorning with garments and jewelry, presentation of incense, lamps, flowers, and food (naivedya), recitation of mantras, and conclusion with surrender (samarpana) and distribution of blessed remnants (prasad).[160] Bhakti, denoting participatory devotion or "sharing" in the divine, emerged as a dominant Hindu path prioritizing emotional love and surrender to a personal god over Vedic sacrifices or ascetic knowledge.[161] Its scriptural roots trace to the Bhagavad Gita's twelfth chapter, where Krishna delineates bhakti yoga as accessible surrender—fixing the mind and intellect on him through constant remembrance, equanimity, and non-attachment—yielding divine grace for liberation.[162] This approach democratized spirituality, allowing laypeople direct access without priestly mediation, though later scholastic traditions like Ramanuja's qualified non-dualism (11th-12th century) integrated it with ritual and philosophy. The bhakti movement crystallized in South India from the 6th to 9th centuries CE, propelled by the Alvars—12 Vaishnava poets extolling Vishnu through Tamil hymns—and the Nayanars—63 Shaiva saints praising Shiva—whose works, compiled in the Divya Prabandham and Tevaram, bypassed Sanskrit elitism to foster vernacular, caste-inclusive devotion.[163] [164] Spreading northward by the 12th-17th centuries, it influenced figures like Kabir (c. 1440-1518), who critiqued idolatry while urging inner devotion, and Mirabai (c. 1498-1546), embodying ecstatic Krishna bhakti amid persecution.[164] Bhakti often manifests through puja, kirtan (devotional singing), and pilgrimage, valuing sincerity over orthodoxy. Temple worship amplifies puja and bhakti in architecturally symbolic spaces (mandirs), where murtis consecrated via prana pratishtha rituals embody the deity for communal veneration.[160] Daily cycles, typically at dawn (mangala) and dusk (sandhya), involve priests invoking deities with conch blasts, bell rings, and aarti—waving ghee or camphor lamps in circular motions while chanting, signifying light conquering darkness and distributing fiery blessings to attendees.[160] Devotees queue for darshan, the profound eye-contact exchange with the adorned, fanned murti, believed to transmit grace and purify the soul.[160] Offerings escalate in scale—garlands, fruits, sweets—culminating in naivedya and prasad sharing, alongside tilak application and holy water (theertham).[160] Post-darshan, parikrama encircles the garbha griha (sanctum), reinforcing cosmic order. Sectarian variations persist: Vaishnava temples stress Vishnu's avatars, Shaiva ones Shiva lingams, with festivals amplifying rituals; yet core practices unify bhakti's experiential focus, drawing millions annually to sites like Tirupati (over 50,000 daily visitors as of 2023 data).[160]Samskaras: Life-Cycle Rites
Samskaras represent a structured sequence of purificatory rituals in Hinduism, designed to sanctify and prepare individuals for successive life stages by removing impurities accumulated from past karma and fostering alignment with dharma. Derived from Vedic domestic manuals known as Grihya Sutras, these rites emphasize physical, intellectual, and spiritual refinement, with the classical count of sixteen (shodasha samskaras) emerging from texts like the Ashvalayana Grihya Sutra around the 5th century BCE.[165][166] Earlier Dharmasutras, such as Gautama's from the mid-1st millennium BCE, listed up to 40 samskaras, reflecting an evolving tradition that prioritized essential transitions over exhaustive enumeration.[166] The rites span prenatal, childhood, educational, marital, and posthumous phases, performed primarily by householders under priestly guidance, often involving mantras from the Rigveda and offerings like fire rituals (homa). Their purpose extends beyond ceremonial marking to instill virtues such as discipline and ethical conduct, with textual emphasis on timing based on lunar cycles and the child's nakshatra (birth star). While universally acknowledged in scriptures like the Manusmriti, observance varies by region, sect, and social group; for instance, upanayana is restricted to dvija varnas (Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas), underscoring varna-specific duties.[167][168] In contemporary practice, prenatal samskaras have declined due to medical influences, but marriage and funeral rites remain widespread.[169] The sixteen samskaras are traditionally grouped as follows:- Prenatal rites: Garbhadhana invokes conception through ritual intercourse to ensure a righteous progeny; pumsavana, performed in the third month of pregnancy, protects the fetus and favors male birth via herbal and mantric rites; simantonnayana in the seventh or eighth month parts the mother's hair to safeguard the child from evil spirits.[168][170]
- Childhood rites: Jatakarman welcomes the newborn with paternal feeding of ghee and honey; namakarana names the child on the tenth or twelfth day; nishkramana marks the first outing at four months; annaprashana introduces solids around six months; chudakarana involves tonsure in the first or third year; karnavedha pierces ears for health and ornamentation.[171][172]
- Educational rites: Vidyarambha initiates literacy around five years; upanayana, between ages 8-12 for dvija boys, invests the sacred thread and commences Vedic study under a guru; vedarambha follows for deeper scriptural learning; samavartana celebrates educational completion and return to lay life.[167][166]
- Maturity and end rites: Vivaha solemnizes marriage with saptapadi (seven steps) vows; antishtha or antyeshti conducts cremation and ancestral rites to aid the soul's transition. Some traditions include vanaprastha for renunciation, though not universally counted among the sixteen.[168][170]
Sadhana: Yoga, Tantra, and Ascetic Disciplines
Sadhana, derived from the Sanskrit root sadh, denotes disciplined spiritual practice aimed at self-purification and realization of the divine, often involving sustained efforts to align the individual with cosmic order through meditation, ritual, and ethical conduct.[174] In Hindu traditions, sadhana encompasses diverse methodologies tailored to the practitioner's temperament, emphasizing empirical self-observation and progressive mastery over mind and body to transcend ego-bound limitations.[175] Yoga, as systematized in Patanjali's Yoga Sutras (circa 400 CE), forms a core sadhana path through Ashtanga or eightfold discipline: yama (ethical restraints like non-violence and truthfulness), niyama (observances such as purity and contentment), asana (postures for physical stability), pranayama (breath control), pratyahara (sensory withdrawal), dharana (concentration), dhyana (meditation), and samadhi (absorption leading to liberation).[176] This framework targets cessation of mental fluctuations (chitta vritti nirodha), verifiable through practitioners' reported states of heightened awareness and detachment, distinct from modern physical exercise interpretations.[177] Hatha Yoga, emerging later around the 10th-11th centuries in texts like the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, integrates physical techniques to prepare for meditative absorption, focusing on energy channels (nadis) and subtle forces (prana) for inner balance.[178] Tantra sadhana, rooted in Shaiva and Shakta lineages from texts like the Tantras (post-5th century CE), employs mantras, yantras (geometric diagrams), and ritual visualization to harness latent energies for non-dual realization, countering Western misconceptions of mere sensuality by prioritizing causal manipulation of consciousness via sound and form.[179] Kaula traditions within Shaktism, as in the Kaula Tantra, emphasize the left-hand path (vama marga) with symbolic transgression of dualities to unite Shiva (consciousness) and Shakti (power), practiced esoterically to generate transformative inner heat without reliance on external purity norms.[180] Empirical validation arises from initiates' accounts of siddhis (supernormal powers) and ecstatic states, though secrecy limits widespread verification, with right-hand paths (dakshina marga) favoring orthodox worship.[181] Ascetic disciplines, termed tapas (austerity generating spiritual "heat" to incinerate karma), include prolonged fasting, exposure to elements, and celibacy, as exemplified by forest-dwelling rishis in Vedic literature who accumulated merit for revelation.[182] Sannyasa, the fourth life stage, involves total renunciation of worldly ties post-householder duties, marked by symbolic funeral rites and adoption of ochre robes, enabling detachment for moksha pursuit, as practiced by orders like Dashanami Sampradaya founded by Adi Shankara in the 8th century CE.[183] These practices, while extreme, yield causal effects like enhanced resilience and insight, corroborated by historical ascetics' influence on doctrine, though over-emphasis risks physical harm absent balanced guidance.[184]Festivals, Vows, and Tirtha Pilgrimages
Hindu festivals, known as utsavas, mark significant events in mythology, seasons, and lunar cycles, involving rituals, fasting, feasting, and communal gatherings to honor deities and reinforce dharma. Major observances include Diwali, celebrated typically in October or November on the new moon of Kartik, symbolizing the victory of light over darkness through the return of Rama to Ayodhya after defeating Ravana, with practices such as lighting lamps, firecrackers, and Lakshmi puja for prosperity.[185][186] Holi, held in March on the full moon of Phalguna, commemorates Krishna's playful antics and the triumph of Prahlada over Holika, featuring bonfires, colored powders, and sweets to signify spring's renewal and forgiveness of enmities.[187] Navratri, spanning nine nights twice yearly—Sharad Navratri in September-October and Chaitra in March-April—focuses on Durga's battle against Mahishasura, with devotees performing garba dances, fasting, and idol immersions for the divine feminine's power.[188] Dussehra, concluding Navratri on the tenth day of Ashvin, celebrates Rama's slaying of Ravana, marked by effigy burnings and Ramlila performances across northern India.[189]- Diwali: Lights lamps to dispel ignorance; involves cleaning homes and exchanging gifts.[185]
- Holi: Throws colors symbolizing joy; prohibits grains in some traditions.[187]
- Navratri: Worships nine forms of Shakti; culminates in Durga Puja in Bengal with elaborate pandals.[188]
- Dussehra: Symbolizes good over evil; includes processions of deities.[189]
Social Framework and Ethics
Varna Theory: Scriptural Division of Labor
The varna system, as delineated in Hindu scriptures, establishes a fourfold division of society intended to organize labor and societal functions according to inherent qualities and roles, originating in the Rigveda's Purusha Sukta (10.90). This hymn portrays the cosmic being Purusha sacrificing himself to create the universe, with the Brahmins emerging from his mouth (symbolizing speech and knowledge), Kshatriyas from his arms (denoting strength and protection), Vaishyas from his thighs (representing support and productivity), and Shudras from his feet (indicating service and mobility).[201][202] The framework emphasizes interdependence, where each varna contributes to cosmic and social order (ṛta), rather than equality of function, with Brahmins positioned as intellectual and ritual guides.[203] Subsequent scriptures refine this as a principle of differentiation by guṇa (qualities: sattva for purity, rajas for activity, tamas for inertia) and karma (actions), not strictly by janma (birth). The Bhagavad Gita (4.13) states: "cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśaḥ," indicating that the four varnas were created by the divine according to the divisions of qualities and works, underscoring a functional allocation to maintain dharma (cosmic law).[204][205] This aligns with earlier Vedic indications of fluidity, where individuals could embody varna traits irrespective of lineage, though later texts increasingly tied it to hereditary lines.[206] Duties (svadharma) for each varna are elaborated in Dharmaśāstras like the Manusmriti (c. 200 BCE–200 CE), prescribing Brahmins to study and teach the Vedas, perform yajñas (sacrifices), and engage in ascetic practices while avoiding hoarding wealth; Kshatriyas to wield arms for protection, administer justice, and study scriptures; Vaishyas to tend cattle, farm, and conduct trade without usury; and Shudras to provide manual service to the upper varnas without independent ritual authority or Vedic access.[207][208] These roles ensure societal stability through specialization, with prohibitions on varṇa-saṅkara (mixing of duties) to prevent disorder, as warned in the Gita (3.24–25).[204] While idealized as a merit-based archetype in primary texts like the Vedas and Upanishads, the varna theory's implementation varied, with scriptures imposing ritual purity gradients—Brahmins exempt from capital punishment and entitled to alms, contrasted with Shudras' exclusion from certain sacraments—reflecting a hierarchical realism rooted in observed human aptitudes rather than egalitarian abstraction.[209][203] Empirical analyses of Vedic hymns reveal no embryonic rigid birth-based enforcement predating the late Vedic period, suggesting an initial emphasis on occupational guilds over inherited status.[210]Jati Evolution: From Fluidity to Rigidity
In the early Vedic period (c. 1500–1000 BCE), social organization centered on the varna system, which classified individuals primarily by occupation, qualities (guna), and actions (karma) rather than rigid birth ascription, allowing for functional flexibility. Jati precursors, resembling occupational guilds or shrenis, emerged toward the later Vedic phase (c. 1000–500 BCE) as localized, endogamous groups tied to trades, regions, and kinship, but with scope for mobility and inter-group cooperation evidenced in texts like the Rigveda, where varna roles were not strictly hereditary.[211] Instances of upward mobility underscore this initial fluidity, including the sage Vishwamitra's transition from Kshatriya warrior to Brahmin through rigorous penance, as recounted in the Ramayana and Mahabharata, and Valmiki's elevation from Shudra hunter to revered Brahmin author of the Ramayana via spiritual discipline.[212] Such examples, drawn from epic literature, indicate that varna and early jati affiliations could shift based on merit, ascetic achievement, or royal patronage, contrasting with later fixity. By the post-Vedic and epic period (c. 500 BCE–200 CE), jatis proliferated into thousands of subgroups, increasingly linked to hereditary transmission amid agrarian economies that prioritized familial skill inheritance and land control. Codifications in Dharmashastras, such as the Manusmriti (composed c. 200 BCE–200 CE), prescribed birth as the determinant of status, enforcing endogamy and prohibiting hypergamy to safeguard ritual purity (shuddhi) and dharma, thereby curtailing mobility.[211] Kautilya's Arthashastra (c. 300 BCE) reflects this shift, documenting guild regulations and caste-based penalties that imply growing occupational exclusivity, though some administrative flexibility persisted.[213] Rigidity intensified during the classical and medieval eras (c. 200–1500 CE), driven by factors including feudal land grants (jagirs) that tied jatis to villages, ritual hierarchies emphasizing pollution (ashuddha) taboos, and political fragmentation under dynasties like the Guptas (320–550 CE), where jati panchayats emerged to adjudicate internal disputes and enforce customs. Foreign incursions, such as those by the Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 CE), prompted defensive consolidation of jati identities for mutual aid and resource pooling, further entrenching endogamy and hierarchy. By the Vijayanagara period (1336–1646 CE), texts like the Dasa Prachanda Chaitanya describe over 3,000 jatis with minimal intermarriage, marking the system's peak rigidity prior to colonial enumerations.[211] This evolution from adaptive divisions to birth-locked strata prioritized social stability and purity over individual agency, as analyzed in historical reconstructions of economic and doctrinal pressures.[214]Family, Kinship, and Gender Dynamics
![Ardhanarishvara, half-male half-female form of Shiva][float-right]The traditional Hindu family structure emphasizes the joint family system, comprising three to four generations living together, including grandparents, parents, uncles, aunts, and their children, which fosters collectivistic values and intergenerational support.[215] This model has historically prevailed in rural and agricultural households, where larger landholdings correlate with joint setups, as evidenced by studies showing joint families more common among such demographics.[216] The average household size in India stands at 5.24 members, with joint families nearly twice the size of nuclear ones.[217] While urbanization and economic mobility have driven a shift toward nuclear families since the mid-20th century—evident in 1961 census data indicating 78% joint households declining amid modern influences—joint arrangements persist, particularly for the elderly, with most over 60 residing with married sons.[218][219] Kinship in Hinduism is patrilineal, organized around the gotra system, where individuals inherit their father's clan lineage tracing back to ancient sages, serving as an exogamous unit to prohibit marriages within the same gotra and mitigate genetic risks.[220][221] This rule enforces clan-level exogamy alongside broader caste endogamy, with sapinda prohibitions extending to close blood relatives.[222] Kinship terminology reflects hierarchical and relational nuances, distinguishing North Indian systems—often classificatory and lineal for paternal kin—with specific terms like dada for paternal grandfather and bhabi for brother's wife, underscoring strong mother-son bonds over spousal ties in traditional dynamics.[223][224] Marriage customs reinforce these ties through arranged unions, which remain prevalent with near-universal marriage rates and low divorce, culminating in rituals like kanyadan, where the bride's father symbolically entrusts her to the groom, rooted in Vedic traditions emphasizing paternal responsibility and spousal duty.[225][226] Gender dynamics in Hindu scriptures prescribe patriarchal roles, with texts like the Manusmriti mandating women's dependence on male guardians—father in youth, husband in adulthood, and son in widowhood—while enjoining their protection and honor to ensure familial welfare, as in verses urging adornment and reverence for women desiring prosperity.[227][228] Yet, the same text warns of guarding women against "evil inclinations," reflecting prescriptive controls on mobility, autonomy, and conduct to maintain social order, though interpretations vary between viewing these as protective norms or restrictive impositions.[229][230] Historical practices aligned with these, positioning women primarily as homemakers and reproducers within the family, with reverence for maternal roles coexisting alongside taboos like widow remarriage restrictions.[231] In contemporary contexts, while scriptural ideals influence persistence of gender-segregated duties, legal and social reforms have expanded women's public roles, though traditional kinship expectations continue to shape intra-family power dynamics.[232]
Ahimsa, Dietary Norms, and Moral Conduct
Ahimsa, the principle of non-violence or non-injury, is articulated in Hindu scriptures as a foundational ethical restraint, extending to thoughts, words, and actions toward all living beings.[233] It appears in Vedic texts like the Rig Veda, where it is invoked alongside other virtues, and gains prominence in post-Vedic works such as the Upanishads and epics.[234] The Mahabharata declares "ahimsa paramo dharmaḥ" (non-violence is the highest duty) in multiple parvas, including Anushasana Parva, emphasizing restraint from harm as superior to ritual obligations in certain contexts. However, ahimsa is not absolute; the Bhagavad Gita qualifies it within the framework of dharma, permitting violence in righteous warfare to uphold cosmic order, as instructed to Arjuna.[235] In the Vedic period (c. 1500–500 BCE), ahimsa coexisted with ritual animal sacrifices (yajnas) involving cattle and other livestock, where meat consumption followed offerings to deities like Indra and Agni, reflecting a pragmatic ethic tied to survival and propitiation rather than strict non-harm.[236] Post-Vedic developments, influenced by internal philosophical refinement and interactions with ascetics, elevated ahimsa toward a more universal ideal, as seen in Dharma Shastras and Yoga Sutras, where it forms the first yama (restraint).[237] This evolution paralleled a cultural shift, though ritual violence persisted in some tantric and folk traditions. Dietary norms in Hinduism derive partly from ahimsa, promoting sattvic (pure) foods like grains, dairy, fruits, and vegetables to foster mental clarity and spiritual progress, while cautioning against tamasic (dulling) meats that incite passion or lethargy.[238] The Manusmriti (c. 200 BCE–200 CE) prohibits meat for Brahmins except in ancestral rites, deeming unnecessary killing sinful, and later texts like the Mahabharata advocate vegetarianism as meritorious.[239] Beef avoidance intensified from the post-Vedic era, sacralizing cows as symbols of motherhood and sustenance (e.g., providers of milk and labor), with texts like the Rig Veda (10.87.16) condemning cow slaughter outside rituals.[240] Yet, archaeological and textual evidence, including Vedic hymns referencing bovine offerings, indicates ancient Hindus consumed beef in sacrificial contexts, challenging monolithic vegetarian narratives.[241] Today, while about 30–40% of Indian Hindus adhere to strict vegetarianism—higher among Vaishnavas—many, especially in coastal or tribal regions, incorporate fish or goat, reflecting regional pragmatism over doctrinal absolutism.[242] Broader moral conduct encompasses dharma (righteous duty), tailored to varna, ashrama (life stage), and circumstance, alongside the yamas and niyamas from Patanjali's Yoga Sutras (c. 400 CE). Yamas include ahimsa, satya (truthfulness), asteya (non-stealing), brahmacharya (celibacy or moderation), and aparigraha (non-possessiveness), serving as universal restraints.[243] Niyamas comprise shaucha (purity), santosha (contentment), tapas (austerity), svadhyaya (self-study), and ishvara pranidhana (surrender to the divine), promoting inner discipline.[244] These codes, rooted in Vedic ethics, prioritize causal responsibility—actions generating karma—and empirical self-observation over rigid legalism, allowing flexibility for householders versus ascetics.[245] Dharma Shastras like those of Manu further detail conduct, enjoining charity, filial piety, and avoidance of intoxicants, but critiques note interpretive biases in modern academia that overemphasize ahimsa while downplaying Vedic martial ethics.[246]Sectarian and Regional Variations
Major Sampradayas: Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism
Vaishnavism, one of the principal traditions in Hinduism, centers devotion on Vishnu as the supreme deity, often manifested through avatars such as Rama and Krishna to preserve cosmic order.[247] Its roots trace to Vedic references to Vishnu in the Rigveda, evolving through the epics' bhakti elements and pre-Christian Vasudeva cults, with formalized bhakti movements emerging via the Alvars' poetry between the 6th and 9th centuries CE in South India.[248] Key scriptures include the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu Purana, and Pancharatra Agamas, emphasizing bhakti yoga, temple rituals, and ethical conduct aligned with dharma.[247] Practices involve kirtan, pilgrimage to sites like Tirupati, and sects such as Sri Vaishnavism under Ramanuja (11th century CE), which integrates qualified non-dualism.[249] Shaivism reveres Shiva as the ultimate reality, embodying destruction, asceticism, and transcendence, with origins linked to pre-Vedic cults and Indus Valley seals depicting proto-Shiva figures around 2500 BCE.[250] Vedic Rudra hymns prefigure Shiva's dual benevolent-ferocious aspects, developing into Agamic traditions by the early centuries CE, including Kashmir Shaivism's non-dual philosophy via Vasugupta (8th-9th century CE).[251] Scriptures encompass Shaiva Agamas, Puranas like Shiva Purana, and Upanishads such as Svetasvatara, guiding practices of yoga, linga worship, and tantric rituals for liberation through Shiva's grace.[250] Adherents, estimated at around 385 million globally, predominate in South India and Nepal, with sub-traditions like Lingayatism rejecting caste and emphasizing personal devotion.[251] Shaktism worships Shakti, the dynamic feminine energy as supreme, often as Devi in forms like Durga or Kali, with prehistoric roots evidenced by fertility artifacts and Vedic goddess mentions evolving into Tantric frameworks by the 6th century CE via texts like Devi Mahatmya.[252] Core scriptures include Devi-Bhagavata Purana, Kalika Purana, and Tantras, focusing on kundalini awakening, yantra meditation, and sacrificial rites to harness shakti for empowerment and moksha.[253] Practices blend devotional puja with esoteric initiations, prominent in Bengal and Assam, where Shaktism intersects with folk traditions; estimates place followers at 20-30% of Hindus, though overlaps with other sampradayas complicate precise counts.[252] These sampradayas differ primarily in ishta-devata—Vishnu's preservation, Shiva's dissolution, Shakti's creation—yet share Vedic foundations and paths to realization, with many Hindus engaging multiple deities eclectically.[254]Smartism and Advaita Synthesis
Smartism, also known as the Smarta tradition, represents a non-sectarian Hindu denomination primarily followed by Brahmin communities that adheres to Smriti texts while venerating multiple principal deities as manifestations of a singular ultimate reality, Brahman.[255] This tradition was formalized in the 8th century CE by Adi Shankaracharya (c. 788–820 CE), who integrated it with Advaita Vedanta, a philosophical school asserting the non-dual identity of the individual self (Atman) with Brahman, dismissing apparent multiplicity as illusory (maya).[256][257] The synthesis of Smartism and Advaita Vedanta emphasizes a monistic worldview where diverse deities—such as Shiva, Vishnu, Devi (Shakti), Ganesha, and Surya—serve as provisional symbols or aspects of the formless Brahman, allowing practitioners to transcend sectarian divisions like those in Vaishnavism or Shaivism.[258] Adi Shankaracharya's commentaries on the Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita, and Brahma Sutras established Advaita's intellectual foundation, which Smartism ritualistically embodies by permitting eclectic worship without exclusive devotion to one deity.[255] This approach aligns with Advaita's core tenet that empirical distinctions, including divine forms, dissolve in ultimate non-dual realization, fostering a unified Hindu orthodoxy amid diverse regional practices.[258] Central to Smartism's ritual synthesis is the Panchayatana puja, a worship system introduced by Shankaracharya involving five deities arranged in a quincunx pattern on a metal plate, each represented by specific icons: Shiva as a lingam, Vishnu as a saligrama stone, Shakti as a yantra, Ganesha as an idol, and Surya as a metal disc.[258] Practitioners select one as the ishta devata (preferred deity) for primary focus while honoring the others, reflecting Advaita's reconciliation of theistic devotion (bhakti) with philosophical non-dualism by viewing all forms as equally valid paths to Brahman.[259] This practice underscores Smartism's role in promoting doctrinal flexibility and ritual inclusivity, historically aiding the consolidation of Brahmanical authority during medieval challenges from Buddhism and Jainism.[256] Smartism's Advaita-infused framework has influenced institutions like the Sringeri Sharada Peetham, established by Shankaracharya, which continues to propagate these teachings through monastic lineages emphasizing scriptural study (shravana), reflection (manana), and meditation (nididhyasana) alongside temple worship.[258] While Advaita provides the metaphysical rigor—positing Brahman as the sole reality, sat-chit-ananda (existence-consciousness-bliss)—Smartism operationalizes it in daily orthopraxy, balancing jnana (knowledge) with karma (ritual action).[255] This enduring synthesis maintains Smartism's prominence among South Indian Brahmin groups, though its non-exclusive nature has led to adaptations in modern diaspora contexts.[254]Folk, Tribal, and Syncretic Traditions
Folk traditions in Hinduism encompass localized practices centered on grāmadevatās, tutelary deities believed to safeguard villages from calamities and maintain communal harmony. These deities, often female figures such as protective mother goddesses, are propitiated through annual festivals involving animal sacrifices, processions, and communal feasts, distinct from pan-Indian Vedic rituals.[260][261] Worship occurs at simple shrines under sacred trees or open-air platforms, emphasizing empirical appeasement of local spirits over abstract philosophical inquiry.[262] Tribal or Adivasi traditions, practiced by approximately 104 million indigenous groups in India as of the 2011 census, frequently integrate animistic elements with Hindu frameworks, such as venerating nature spirits alongside major deities like Shiva or Durga. Historical processes of assimilation have seen tribal clans adopt Hindu festivals and caste-like endogamy while retaining ancestor worship and shamanic healing, leading to hybrid identities where 93% of tribals align with Hinduism or syncretic variants per ethnographic surveys.[263] In regions like Odisha and Madhya Pradesh, Adivasi groups such as the Gond or Santhal equate indigenous heroes with Hindu avatars, fostering coexistence rather than erasure of pre-existing beliefs.[264][265] Syncretic traditions arise from the causal interplay of Vedic expansion with indigenous practices, exemplified in southern India's incorporation of Dravidian folk deities into Puranic narratives, where local guardians like Mariamman are reinterpreted as forms of Shakti.[266] In Bengal and Assam, Bhakti movements from the 15th century onward blended folk songs and possession rituals with devotional theism, producing regional sects like the Bauls who merge Vaishnava iconography with tantric esotericism.[267] Northeastern examples, such as the Heraka reform among Zeliangrong Nagas since the 1920s, selectively adopt Hindu monotheism while rejecting beef taboos, illustrating adaptive retention amid colonial and missionary pressures.[268] These fusions, driven by geographic isolation and economic interdependence, preserve causal efficacy in rituals like harvest offerings, verifiable through persistent village-level adherence despite urban Sanskritization efforts.[269]Demographics and Global Diffusion
Historical Migrations and Trade Diasporas
Hinduism disseminated to Southeast Asia primarily through maritime trade networks initiated by Indian merchants from the 1st century CE, involving small groups of traders, sailors, priests, and scholars rather than large-scale population movements. These intermediaries introduced religious texts, rituals, and Brahmanical practices, which local rulers adopted to legitimize authority, fostering Hindu-Buddhist syncretic kingdoms without mass conversions. Dominant influences included Shaivism from southern India, evident in temple complexes like Prambanan in Java (9th century CE) and Angkor Wat in Cambodia (early 12th century CE), reflecting Vishnu worship amid broader Indic cultural integration.[270][271] Southern Indian Tamil traders and adventurers sustained this diffusion until approximately 1500 CE, establishing enduring Hindu traditions in Bali, Indonesia, where practices persist amid later Islamic dominance elsewhere in the archipelago. Inland routes also facilitated limited spread to Central Asia and beyond, but maritime paths dominated, linking ports from Gujarat to the Malay Peninsula and correlating with archaeological finds of Indian-style artifacts dated to the 4th-5th centuries CE in sites like Oc Eo, Vietnam.[271] In the colonial period, British indenture systems post-1834 slavery abolition transported roughly 2 million Indians, with about 80% Hindus from northern and southern regions, to labor on sugar plantations across 19 colonies from 1834 to 1917. Initial voyages included shipments from Calcutta to Mauritius in 1834 and Trinidad in 1845, creating self-sustaining Hindu communities through retained caste structures, temple constructions, and festivals despite exploitative conditions. These diasporas formed plural-majority Hindu populations in Mauritius (over 50% by independence in 1968) and Fiji (about 44% in the early 20th century), alongside minorities in Guyana, Suriname, and South Africa, preserving orthopraxic elements adapted to new environments.[272][273]Contemporary Population: Growth and Distribution (c. 1.2 Billion Adherents)
As of 2020, the global Hindu population stood at nearly 1.2 billion, representing approximately 15% of the world's total population and marking a 12% increase from just under 1.1 billion in 2010, driven primarily by natural population growth rather than conversions.[7] Projections indicate this figure will reach about 1.4 billion by 2050, growing at a rate roughly aligned with overall global population expansion, with fertility rates among Hindus averaging around 2.3 children per woman in recent decades.[274] Unlike proselytizing faiths, Hinduism exhibits negligible net conversion gains or losses worldwide, with retention sustained through cultural and familial transmission amid low emigration of adherents from core regions.[275] The overwhelming majority—over 94%—of Hindus reside in India, where they numbered approximately 966 million as of recent estimates, comprising about 78-80% of the national population based on 2011 census data and subsequent projections accounting for slower growth relative to other groups.[275] This share has declined from 84.7% in 1951 to 78.1% by 2015, attributable to higher fertility rates among Muslim Indians (averaging 2.6 children per woman versus 2.1 for Hindus as of 2020), though absolute Hindu numbers continue to rise through births exceeding 16 million annually.[276][275] Outside India, Nepal hosts the second-largest Hindu population at around 28-30 million (80.6% of its populace), followed by Bangladesh with roughly 13 million (about 8% nationally), reflecting historical demographic patterns in South Asia where Hinduism originated and persists as an ethnic-cultural mainstay.[277][7] Southeast Asia maintains pockets of Hindu communities, notably in Indonesia (over 4 million, concentrated in Bali) and Malaysia (about 2 million), stemming from ancient cultural transmissions and colonial-era migrations rather than recent expansion.[277] Diaspora populations, totaling under 6% of global Hindus, have grown through 20th- and 21st-century labor and professional migrations, with the United States hosting 3 million (primarily Indian-origin professionals), the United Kingdom 1.1 million, and smaller clusters in Canada, Australia, the Gulf states, and Mauritius (where Hindus form 48% of the population).[7] These overseas groups exhibit higher retention rates than in origin countries but face assimilation pressures, contributing modestly to global growth via above-replacement fertility in some migrant cohorts.[274]| Country | Estimated Hindu Population (millions, ca. 2020) | Share of National Population (%) | Primary Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 1,126 | 78-80 | Core homeland; 93.8% of world Hindus |
| Nepal | 34 | 80.6 | Highest national percentage |
| Bangladesh | 12 | 8 | Ethnic minority in Muslim-majority state |
| Indonesia | 4.2 | 1.7 | Bali-centric; ancient roots |
| United States | 3.0 | 0.9 | Recent immigrant growth |
Retention, Conversion, and Diaspora Challenges
Hindus exhibit one of the highest religious retention rates globally, with approximately 99% of individuals raised Hindu remaining affiliated as adults, according to a 2025 Pew Research Center analysis of 36 countries covering adults under 55.[278] This near-total retention stems from Hinduism's ethnic and cultural embeddedness, particularly in India where familial and communal pressures reinforce continuity, though it faces pressures from socioeconomic factors like caste-based conversions among lower strata seeking social mobility. In India, net religious switching shows minimal impact on Hindu demographics, with Pew's 2021 survey indicating 0.7% converting away from Hinduism balanced by 0.8% converting in, primarily through reconversion efforts or voluntary adoption, though critics argue underreporting of outflows to Christianity and Islam due to legal and social barriers.[279][280] Conversion dynamics pose inherent challenges for Hinduism's expansion, as its traditions historically eschew aggressive proselytization, relying instead on birth rates and cultural diffusion rather than doctrinal evangelism seen in Abrahamic faiths. Empirical data reveal low inbound conversions globally, with India's Hindu population growing by 138 million between 2001 and 2011 primarily through natural increase, not switching, while outflows—estimated at under 1% net—include Dalit conversions to Buddhism (e.g., via Ambedkar's 1956 mass movement) or Christianity for perceived escape from caste hierarchies.[275] Reconversion initiatives, such as Vishva Hindu Parishad's "Ghar Wapsi" campaigns since the 2010s, have reclaimed thousands annually but face legal scrutiny under anti-conversion laws in states like Uttar Pradesh (enacted 2021), highlighting tensions between preservation and coercion allegations. In regions like Kerala, Hinduism recorded net gains, comprising 47% of 2020 conversions per state data, often from Christian or Muslim backgrounds amid economic incentives.[281] Diaspora Hindus, numbering around 18 million outside India as of 2020 (concentrated in the US, UK, Canada, and Gulf states), encounter amplified retention challenges from assimilation, intermarriage, and secular host societies. In the US, interfaith marriage rates among Hindus remain low at about 10% per 2008 Pew data, rising modestly to 38% outside Dharmic faiths in recent surveys, yet second-generation youth face dilution through exogamy and Western individualism, with community surveys noting declining ritual observance among college-educated offspring.[282] UK Hindus similarly report intergenerational gaps, where 20-30% of British-born youth disengage from temple practices due to peer influence and lack of doctrinal rigidity, per ethnographic studies, compounded by discrimination like post-9/11 xenophobia targeting South Asians.[283] These pressures manifest in adaptive strategies, such as ISKCON's global outreach (e.g., Helsinki centers since the 1980s), which sustains diaspora vitality but struggles against broader secularization trends eroding ethnic-religious ties.[284] Overall, while endogenous retention fortifies Hinduism's core, diaspora vulnerabilities underscore causal risks from globalization and fertility differentials, with India's Hindu share declining from 84% in 1951 to 80% in 2011 despite negligible switching.[275]Controversies and Critical Perspectives
Caste Hierarchies: Affirmations, Abuses, and Reforms
The varna system, comprising Brahmins (priests and scholars), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (merchants and farmers), and Shudras (laborers and servants), originates in the Purusha Sukta of the Rigveda (10.90.12), which describes these divisions emerging from the cosmic Purusha's body: Brahmins from the mouth, Kshatriyas from the arms, Vaishyas from the thighs, and Shudras from the feet, establishing a hierarchical order tied to cosmic creation.[285][286] Later texts like the Manusmriti (c. 200 BCE–200 CE) affirm and rigidify this hierarchy by birth, prescribing distinct duties, privileges, and punishments: Brahmins receive the highest reverence and lightest penalties, while Shudras face severe restrictions, such as prohibitions on accumulating wealth or studying Vedas, with verses mandating that Shudras serve higher varnas without retaliation.[287] The Bhagavad Gita (4.13) further endorses varna as divinely ordained by Krishna for societal function, though interpretations vary on whether it implies strict birth-determination or aptitude; empirical historical application, however, entrenched endogamy and occupational inheritance, evolving into thousands of jatis (sub-castes) by the medieval period.[288] Abuses of the system manifested in systemic discrimination, particularly against those outside varna (avarnas or Dalits, comprising about 16–20% of India's population), including untouchability practices that barred access to temples, wells, and schools, with historical evidence from colonial records and eyewitness accounts documenting forced segregation and ritual pollution beliefs.[289] Violence persisted into the 20th century, with Human Rights Watch reporting over 100,000 caste-based crimes annually in the 1990s, including murders, rapes, and land disputes targeting Dalits, often with impunity due to upper-caste dominance in local policing.[290] Contemporary data indicate ongoing issues, such as 45,000 reported atrocities against Scheduled Castes in 2022 per India's National Crime Records Bureau, disproportionately affecting Dalit women through sexual violence tied to caste assertions of superiority.[291] Reforms gained momentum in the 20th century amid colonial scrutiny and independence movements. Mahatma Gandhi condemned untouchability as a "blot on Hinduism" and launched campaigns like the 1932 Vaikom Satyagraha for temple entry, while defending varnashrama (varna duties) as a non-hierarchical division of labor, leading to the Poona Pact that secured reserved seats for Depressed Classes in legislatures instead of separate electorates.[292] B.R. Ambedkar, a Dalit leader and constitution draftsman, rejected varna entirely as inherently oppressive, advocating annihilation of caste through inter-dining, inter-marriage, and conversion; he oversaw the 1950 Indian Constitution's Article 17 abolishing untouchability, Article 15 banning discrimination, and affirmative action quotas (now covering 50% reservations for Scheduled Castes and Tribes in education and jobs).[293] Ambedkar's 1956 mass conversion to Buddhism with 500,000 followers exemplified rejection of Hindu caste norms, influencing subsequent laws like the 1989 Prevention of Atrocities Act, though enforcement remains uneven, with upper-caste backlash and reservation protests highlighting persistent tensions.[294][295]Gender Roles and Historical Practices (e.g., Sati, Menstrual Taboos)
In Vedic texts such as the Rigveda, composed circa 1500–1200 BCE, women participated in religious rituals, education, and intellectual discourse alongside men, with figures like Gargi and Maitreyi noted as philosophers debating with sages.[296] Archaeological evidence from the Indus Valley Civilization (circa 3300–1300 BCE) suggests possible gender parity in burial goods and figurines depicting female deities, indicating reverence for feminine principles predating Aryan influences, though interpretations remain contested due to limited textual corroboration.[297] The Manusmriti, dated to circa 200 BCE–200 CE, delineates patriarchal structures where women are positioned under male guardianship from birth through marriage and widowhood, emphasizing dependence to maintain social order: "In childhood a female must be subject to her father, in youth to her husband, when her lord is dead to her sons; a woman must never be independent."[227] Yet, it also mandates respect and protection for women, prohibiting their mistreatment and affirming their role in household rituals, reflecting a tension between idealization—as seen in goddess worship like Devi in Shaktism—and restrictive norms to curb perceived familial instability.[232] Historical status declined post-Vedic periods, with Gupta-era inscriptions (circa 320–550 CE) showing women's involvement in trade but undervalued contributions, alongside emerging customs like child marriage to preserve caste purity.[298] Sati, the immolation of widows on their husbands' pyres, lacks endorsement in core Vedic scriptures but gained traction from medieval texts like the Puranas and Mahabharata, framing it as a voluntary act of devotion for elite castes, particularly Rajputs, from the 13th century onward amid warrior culture and property concerns.[299] Prevalence was limited, with colonial records estimating 500–600 cases annually by the early 19th century, concentrated in Bengal and Rajasthan, often coerced through social pressure rather than religious imperative; memorial stones (sati sthalas) document instances but do not indicate ubiquity across Hindu society.[76] British authorities banned it in 1829 under Governor-General Lord William Bentinck, upheld by the Privy Council in 1832, citing humanitarian grounds despite opposition from some Hindu reformers who argued it deviated from dharmic norms.[300] Menstrual taboos stem from Hindu concepts of ritual impurity (ashaucha), viewing blood as polluting, leading to seclusion practices where women avoid temples, kitchens, and physical contact during cycles; these appear in texts like the Dharma Shastras but vary regionally without uniform scriptural mandate.[301] In Nepal's far-western Hindu communities, Chhaupadi enforces isolation in sheds (chhau goth), exposing women to health risks like hypothermia and infection, with surveys reporting 19% adherence in 2018 despite a 2005 ban, rooted in myths equating menstruation to a curse rather than biological fact.[302] No empirical evidence supports impurity claims, and persistence correlates with low education and poverty, not core theology, as urban Hindus increasingly discard such restrictions.[303] The Devadasi system, originating circa 9th–10th centuries CE in South Indian temples, dedicated prepubescent girls to deities as ritual servants and dancers, evolving into hereditary prostitution by the colonial era due to economic exploitation and loss of patronage.[304] Affecting thousands, primarily from lower castes, it was critiqued in the 19th century by reformers like E. Krishna Iyer for commodifying women under religious guise; legislative bans began in 1924 (Madras), culminating in the 1947 Devadasi Prevention Act, though underground persistence occurs in states like Karnataka.[305] These practices highlight causal tensions in Hindu traditions—scriptural ideals of feminine divinity clashing with socio-economic enforcement of subordination—prompting reforms driven by internal critics and external pressures rather than doctrinal overhaul.[306]Idol Worship, Ritualism, and Superstition Charges
Critics, particularly from Abrahamic traditions, have long accused Hinduism of idolatry, viewing murti puja (the veneration of consecrated images or icons representing deities) as the worship of created objects rather than a transcendent divine, a practice equated with shirk in Islamic theology and prohibited in texts like the Bible's Exodus 20:4.[307] Historical evidence includes the destruction of thousands of Hindu temples and their idols by Muslim rulers, such as Mahmud of Ghazni's raids on Somnath Temple in 1025 CE, justified as eradicating false gods.[308] Similarly, Christian missionaries in the 19th century, including figures like William Ward, condemned idol worship as pagan superstition hindering conversion, citing surveys of over 1,000 Hindu images in Bengal alone as evidence of polytheistic excess.[309] Within Hinduism, reformers like Swami Dayananda Saraswati (1824–1883), founder of the Arya Samaj in 1875, charged that idol worship deviated from Vedic monotheism, arguing the Rigveda (c. 1500–1200 BCE) contains no sanction for images and warns against mistaking symbols for the formless Brahman, as in hymns like Rigveda 8.20.7 rejecting finite representations of the infinite.[310] Dayananda's Satyarth Prakash (1875) critiqued rituals involving idols as fostering ignorance and priestly exploitation, linking them to social ills like caste rigidity, and advocated shuddhi (purification) rites without icons to revive Vedic purity.[311] Other internal voices, including some Bhakti saints like Kabir (c. 1440–1518), dismissed elaborate puja as empty formalism, prioritizing direct devotion (bhakti) over material aids that could devolve into superstition.[312] Charges of excessive ritualism extend to practices like daily sandhya (twilight prayers), homa (fire offerings), and temple sevas (services), criticized for promoting mechanical adherence over ethical or philosophical insight, potentially stifling rational inquiry. Rationalist reformers such as Periyar E.V. Ramasamy (1879–1973) in the Self-Respect Movement labeled these as Brahminical tools for control, associating them with superstitions like astrology (jyotisha), which influences decisions in 80% of Indian marriages per 2010s surveys, or animal sacrifices in sects like Kali worship, seen as barbaric remnants.[313] Modern atheists and secular critics, including those in Indian rationalist groups like the Indian Rationalist Association (founded 1949), document cases of fraud, such as fake miracles at idol sites, arguing these erode scientific temper; for instance, a 2018 study by the Center for Inquiry India found widespread belief in idol "miracles" correlating with lower education levels in rural areas.[314] Hindu apologists counter that murti puja invokes divine presence via prana pratishtha (consecration rituals), not material worship, serving as a psychological focus for the divine, akin to icons in other faiths, and supported by texts like the Bhagavad Gita 12:5, which acknowledges form aids for the masses while upholding nirguna (formless) Brahman.[315] Empirical observations note rituals' role in community cohesion and mental health, with neuroimaging studies (e.g., 2023 research on darshan) showing reduced stress via focused devotion, though critics like Dayananda's followers maintain Vedic hymns' aniconism (e.g., no idols in 10,000+ Rigvedic verses) indicates later accretions from folk or Dravidian influences, risking literalism.[316] Thus, while charges highlight genuine risks of degeneration into superstition—evident in practices like tantrik sorcery—these remain peripheral to core philosophies like Advaita Vedanta, which transcend ritual through discriminative knowledge (viveka).[317]Interfaith Conflicts: Invasions, Conversions, and Modern Tensions
Hinduism has endured significant interfaith conflicts primarily stemming from Islamic invasions starting in the 8th century, which involved systematic temple destructions and forced conversions. The Arab general Muhammad bin Qasim conquered Sindh in 711–712 CE, marking the initial incursion, followed by raids by Mahmud of Ghazni, who conducted 17 invasions between 1001 and 1026 CE, including the sacking of the Somnath temple in 1026 CE where the idol was smashed and looted. The Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 CE) saw further iconoclasm, with rulers like Muhammad bin Tughluq and Firuz Shah Tughlaq destroying over 80 temples as recorded in contemporary chronicles, often replacing them with mosques to assert dominance. Mughal emperor Aurangzeb (r. 1658–1707) intensified this, ordering the demolition of the Kashi Vishwanath temple in 1669 CE and the Kesava Deo temple in Mathura in 1670 CE, alongside imposing jizya tax on non-Muslims to encourage conversions. These acts were driven by religious zeal to suppress idolatry, resulting in the loss of an estimated thousands of temples, though exact figures vary due to incomplete records. Conversions under Islamic rule were both coercive and incentivized; the jizya tax and threats of enslavement or death for refusal to convert pressured lower castes and rural populations, leading to demographic shifts in regions like Punjab and Bengal, where Hindu populations declined from near-majority to minority status over centuries. British colonial rule (1757–1947) introduced Christian missionary activities, with the Baptist William Carey establishing missions in 1793 CE and converting around 100,000 Indians by 1830 through education and aid, often targeting disadvantaged groups amid perceptions of Hindu social ills. The 1850 Caste Disabilities Act facilitated conversions by allowing inheritance rights for converts, exacerbating tensions as missionaries critiqued practices like sati, banned in 1829 CE. Modern tensions persist, exemplified by the 1947 Partition of India, which triggered riots killing 1–2 million and displacing 15 million, with Hindus and Sikhs fleeing Muslim-majority areas amid massacres. The Ayodhya dispute culminated in the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid, built on the Ram Janmabhoomi site, sparking nationwide riots that claimed over 2,000 lives, mostly Muslim. The 2002 Gujarat riots, following the Godhra train burning that killed 59 Hindu pilgrims, resulted in 790–2,000 Muslim deaths and 250 Hindu deaths, with state complicity alleged but later inquiries attributing primary violence to retaliatory mobs. Christian proselytization continues in southern and northeastern India, prompting anti-conversion laws in states like Uttar Pradesh (2021 CE), which penalize fraudulent inducements amid claims of 5–10% annual Christian growth in some areas through incentives. Hindu-Sikh clashes, such as the 1984 anti-Sikh riots post-Indira Gandhi's assassination, killed 3,000–8,000 Sikhs in Delhi alone. In neighboring countries, post-Partition Hindus faced persecution: in Pakistan, the Hindu population fell from 15% in 1947 to 1.6% by 2023, with forced conversions of 1,000 Hindu girls annually in Sindh due to abductions and marriages. In Bangladesh, Hindus declined from 22% in 1951 to 8% by 2022, amid 1971 genocide targeting Hindus (killing 200,000–3 million) and ongoing temple attacks during festivals. These conflicts reflect causal dynamics of demographic conquest, resource competition, and ideological incompatibility, with mainstream narratives often understating Islamic aggression due to institutional biases favoring minority protections over historical Hindu victimhood.Hindutva and Responses to Secular Narratives
Hindutva, a term coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in his 1923 pamphlet Essentials of Hindutva, posits that a Hindu is defined not merely by religious practice but by viewing India as both pitribhumi (fatherland) and punyabhumi (holy land), thereby encompassing cultural and national identity tied to the subcontinent's indigenous traditions.[318] This ideology emerged amid colonial rule and partition fears, advocating for Hindu unity as a counter to perceived threats from Islamic separatism and missionary conversions, with Savarkar emphasizing self-defense and territorial loyalty over theological exclusivity.[319] The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), founded in 1925 by K.B. Hedgewar, institutionalized Hindutva through daily shakhas (branches) focused on character-building and cultural revival, influencing its political affiliate, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which rose to national power in 1998 and again in 2014 under Narendra Modi.[320][321] Hindutva critiques Indian secularism—enshrined in the Constitution's 42nd Amendment in 1976—as "pseudosecularism," arguing it manifests as minority appeasement, particularly toward Muslims, through policies like separate personal laws and disproportionate welfare allocations that undermine equal citizenship.[322] Proponents, including RSS ideologue M.S. Golwalkar, contended that true secularism requires recognizing Hinduism's civilizational primacy in India, rejecting what they term Congress-era favoritism, such as the 1985 Shah Bano case reversal via the Muslim Women Act, which prioritized Sharia over uniform civil code to secure votes.[323] This response frames secular narratives as ahistorical impositions that ignore demographic shifts from invasions and conversions, estimating Hindu population decline from near 100% pre-1000 CE to 79.8% by the 2011 census, attributing it to unreciprocated tolerance.[80] In historiography, Hindutva challenges secular-left dominance in academia, which it accuses of perpetuating colonial-era distortions like the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) to fracture Hindu identity by portraying Vedic culture as exogenous.[41] Originally proposed by 19th-century Indologists like Max Müller to explain linguistic links between Sanskrit and European languages, AIT posited Indo-European migrants conquering Dravidians around 1500 BCE, a narrative Hindutva scholars rebut with genetic evidence from Rakhigarhi (2019) showing Indus Valley continuity with later populations and no mass invasion markers.[324] Archaeological gaps, such as the Sarasvati River's drying circa 1900 BCE aligning with Rigvedic descriptions rather than post-invasion composition, further support indigenous origins, countering what Hindutva views as Marxist-influenced historiography that essentializes caste as Aryan imposition to delegitimize Hindu unity.[325] These revisions, advanced by figures like B.B. Lal, aim to restore empirical primacy to textual and material evidence over ideologically driven models.[326]Enduring Contributions and Influences
Architectural and Artistic Achievements
Hindu temple architecture developed from early rock-cut caves in the 7th century CE, such as those at Mahabalipuram, to elaborate structural temples by the medieval period, featuring symbolic representations of Mount Meru as the cosmic axis.[327] Three primary styles emerged: the northern Nagara with its curvilinear spire (shikhara), the southern Dravidian with tiered pyramidal towers (vimana), and the hybrid Vesara style blending elements of both. These structures incorporated intricate carvings of deities, mythical scenes from epics like the Ramayana and Mahabharata, and geometric mandalas aligning with Vastu Shastra principles for cosmic harmony.[328] Exemplary Dravidian temples include the Brihadeeswarar Temple in Thanjavur, constructed between 1003 and 1010 CE under Chola king Rajaraja I, featuring a 66-meter granite vimana—the tallest in the style—and over 250 lingams symbolizing Shiva.[329] The Khajuraho temples, built by the Chandela dynasty from the 10th to 12th centuries CE, represent Nagara architecture with 85 original structures (20 surviving), renowned for their detailed erotic and tantric sculptures depicting human-divine union alongside ascetic motifs, covering about 20 square kilometers.[330] Hoysala temples like those at Halebidu (12th century CE) exemplify Vesara with soapstone carvings of over 1,500 elephants and floral motifs, showcasing precision engineering without mortar.[331] Artistic achievements intertwined with architecture, as temples served as canvases for sculpture. Chola bronzes from the 9th to 13th centuries CE, produced via lost-wax casting, include iconic Nataraja figures portraying Shiva's cosmic dance with flames symbolizing creation and destruction; thousands were crafted for temple rituals and processions, demonstrating mastery in capturing dynamic motion and theological symbolism.[332][333] Khajuraho's sandstone reliefs integrate sensuous human forms with sacred iconography, reflecting Shaiva and Vaishnava themes without prudish alteration in historical records.[330] Hindu architectural influence extended to Southeast Asia through trade and migrations, yielding monumental complexes like Angkor Wat in Cambodia, constructed from 1113 to 1150 CE by Suryavarman II as a Vishnu temple, spanning 162.6 hectares with bas-reliefs of the churning of the ocean myth and a central quincunx of towers mimicking Meru.[334][335] Prambanan in Indonesia, erected in the 9th century CE by the Mataram Kingdom, honors the Trimurti (Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva) with terraced shrines and over 200 ancillary temples, blending Indian motifs with local Javanese aesthetics.[336] These exported forms adapted Hindu cosmology to regional landscapes, enduring invasions and conversions while preserving core Vaishnava and Shaiva elements.[337]Intellectual Legacy: Mathematics, Astronomy, and Logic
Ancient Indian scholars, operating within the Hindu intellectual framework, advanced mathematics through innovations in numeral systems and algebraic methods. The positional decimal system, foundational to modern arithmetic, emerged in India by the 5th century CE, enabling efficient computation with place values. Aryabhata (c. 476–550 CE) employed a proto-positional notation in his Aryabhatiya, using letters for digits and the term kha (void) to denote empty places, though without treating zero as a standalone numeral.[338] Brahmagupta (c. 598–668 CE), in his Brahmasphutasiddhanta (628 CE), explicitly defined zero as a number, provided rules for arithmetic operations involving zero and negative numbers—such as and (while noting division by zero as indeterminate)—and solved quadratic equations with integer solutions.[339] These developments facilitated advanced calculations, including approximations of as 3.1416 by Aryabhata and trigonometric tables for sines, predating similar Western formulations.[340] In astronomy, Hindu texts integrated empirical observations with mathematical modeling, yielding precise predictions despite geocentric assumptions. The Surya Siddhanta (c. 4th–5th century CE), attributed to divine revelation in Hindu tradition, details spherical trigonometry for planetary positions, eclipse timings, and Earth's circumference (approximately 5,000 yojanas, equating to about 40,000 km when adjusted for units), closely aligning with modern values.[341] Aryabhata rejected mythological explanations for eclipses, attributing solar eclipses to the Moon's shadow on Earth and lunar ones to Earth's shadow on the Moon, and posited Earth's daily rotation on its axis to explain apparent stellar motion, an idea centuries ahead of Copernicus.[342] These works employed iterative algorithms for mean planetary motions and true positions, enabling forecasts accurate to within arcminutes for centuries, as verified against later observations.[343] The Nyaya school of Hindu philosophy systematized logic as a tool for valid knowledge (pramana), emphasizing inference (anumana) alongside perception and testimony. Founded by Aksapada Gautama in the Nyaya Sutras (c. 2nd century BCE), it outlined a five-membered syllogism for rigorous argumentation: statement of the thesis (e.g., "Fire is on the hill"), reason ("because it smokes"), illustrative example ("like a kitchen"), application ("the hill smokes similarly"), and conclusion reaffirming the thesis.[344] This structure supported deductive and inductive reasoning, including universal generalizations from particulars, and addressed fallacies (hetvabhasa) to refute invalid inferences, influencing debates with rival schools like Buddhism. Nyaya's realism insisted on objective categories (padarthas) such as substance, quality, and action, grounding logic in causal relations observable in the world, which facilitated epistemological debates on causality and epistemology without reliance on unverified metaphysics.[345] Later Navya-Nyaya refinements (14th century onward) enhanced formal analysis of relations and quantifiers, paralleling developments in medieval European scholasticism.[346]Global Impact: Yoga, Vedanta, and Cultural Exports
Swami Vivekananda's address at the Parliament of the World's Religions in Chicago on September 11, 1893, marked a pivotal introduction of Vedanta philosophy and Hinduism to Western audiences, emphasizing universal spiritual principles over sectarian differences.[347] This event spurred the establishment of Vedanta societies in the United States and Europe, with the Ramakrishna Mission, founded in Vivekananda's lineage, operating 208 centers globally as of recent records, including 14 in the USA and branches in multiple countries.[348] Vivekananda's teachings influenced Western intellectuals, fostering appreciation for non-dualistic Vedanta concepts that resonated with transcendentalist thinkers like Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, who had earlier engaged with Hindu texts.[349] Yoga, originating from Hindu scriptures such as the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali compiled around the 2nd century BCE to 5th century CE, has become a major global export, with over 300 million practitioners worldwide as of 2023 estimates, projected to grow further.[350] [351] The practice, traditionally aimed at mind control and spiritual union, has been adapted in the West often as physical exercise, contributing to a global industry valued at approximately $107 billion in 2023.[352] Despite this secularization, yoga's Hindu roots remain evident in its core techniques of asanas, pranayama, and meditation, with empirical studies registering over 2,900 clinical trials on yoga's health benefits by September 2024.[353] [354] Vedanta's global reach extends through organizations propagating Advaita (non-dual) interpretations, impacting cultural figures and even modern media; for instance, elements of Hindu cosmology appear in works like George Lucas's Star Wars, drawing from Joseph Campbell's interpretations influenced by Vedanta.[355] The International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), rooted in Gaudiya Vaishnava traditions of Hinduism, exemplifies cultural export via bhakti devotional practices, maintaining over 400 temples worldwide and promoting vegetarianism and the Hare Krishna mantra globally.[356] These exports have facilitated Hinduism's philosophical influence on Western spirituality, though often decoupled from orthodox ritualism, enabling broader adoption amid empirical validations of practices like meditation for stress reduction.[357]References
- https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Hindi/Family_relations
