Hubbry Logo
Tang dynastyTang dynastyMain
Open search
Tang dynasty
Community hub
Tang dynasty
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tang dynasty
Tang dynasty
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Tang dynasty
"Tang dynasty" in Chinese characters
Chinese唐朝
Hanyu PinyinTángcháo
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinTángcháo
Bopomofoㄊㄤˊ ㄔㄠˊ
Wade–GilesTʻang2-chʻao2
Tongyong PinyinTáng-cháo
IPA[tʰǎŋ.ʈʂʰǎʊ]
Wu
RomanizationDaon zau
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationTòhngchìuh
JyutpingTong4 ciu4
IPA[tʰɔŋ˩.tsʰiw˩]
Southern Min
Hokkien POJTông-tiâu
Tâi-lôTông-tiâu
Middle Chinese
Middle Chinesedang djew

The Tang dynasty (/tɑːŋ/,[7] [tʰǎŋ]; Chinese: 唐朝[a]), or the Tang Empire, was an imperial dynasty of China that ruled from 618 to 907, with an interregnum between 690 and 705. It was preceded by the Sui dynasty and followed by the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. Historians generally regard the Tang as a high point in Chinese civilisation, and a golden age of cosmopolitan culture.[9] Tang territory, acquired through the military campaigns of its early rulers, rivalled that of the Han dynasty.

The Li family founded the dynasty after taking advantage of a period of Sui decline and precipitating their final collapse, in turn inaugurating a period of progress and stability in the first half of the dynasty's rule. The dynasty was formally interrupted during 690–705 when Empress Wu Zetian seized the throne, proclaiming the Wu Zhou dynasty and becoming the only legitimate Chinese empress regnant. The An Lushan rebellion (755–763) led to devastation and the decline of central authority during the latter half of the dynasty. Like the previous Sui dynasty, the Tang maintained a civil-service system by recruiting scholar-officials through standardised examinations and recommendations to office. The rise of regional military governors known as jiedushi during the 9th century undermined this civil order. The dynasty and central government went into decline by the latter half of the 9th century; agrarian rebellions resulted in mass population loss and displacement, widespread poverty, and further government dysfunction that ultimately ended the dynasty in 907.

The Tang capital at Chang'an (present-day Xi'an) was the world's most populous city for much of the dynasty's existence. Two censuses of the 7th and 8th centuries estimated the empire's population at about 50 million people,[10][11] which grew to an estimated 80 million by the dynasty's end.[12][13][b] From its numerous subjects, the dynasty raised professional and conscripted armies of hundreds of thousands of troops to contend with nomadic powers for control of Inner Asia and the lucrative trade-routes along the Silk Road. Far-flung kingdoms and states paid tribute to the Tang court, while the Tang also indirectly controlled several regions through a protectorate system. In addition to its political hegemony, the Tang exerted a powerful cultural influence over neighbouring East Asian nations such as Japan and Korea.

Chinese culture flourished and further matured during the Tang era. It is traditionally considered the greatest age for Chinese poetry.[14] Two of China's most famous poets, Li Bai and Du Fu, belonged to this age, contributing with poets such as Wang Wei to the monumental Three Hundred Tang Poems. Many famous painters such as Han Gan, Zhang Xuan, and Zhou Fang were active, while Chinese court music flourished with instruments such as the popular pipa. Tang scholars compiled a rich variety of historical literature, as well as encyclopaedias and geographical works. Notable innovations included the development of woodblock printing. Buddhism became a major influence in Chinese culture, with native Chinese sects gaining prominence. However, in the 840s, Emperor Wuzong enacted policies to suppress Buddhism, which subsequently declined in influence.

History

[edit]

Establishment

[edit]
Portrait of Emperor Gaozu of Tang (566–635) dating to the Ming dynasty (1368–1644)

The House of Li had ethnic Han origins, and it belonged to the northwest military aristocracy prevalent during the Sui dynasty.[15][16] According to official Tang records, they were paternally descended from Laozi, the traditional founder of Taoism (whose personal name was Li Dan or Li Er), the Han dynasty general Li Guang, and Li Gao, the founder of the Han-ruled Western Liang kingdom.[17][18][19] This family was known as the Longxi Li lineage, which also included the prominent Tang poet Li Bai. The Tang emperors were partially of Xianbei ancestry, as Emperor Gaozu of Tang's mother Duchess Dugu was part-Xianbei.[20][21] Apart from the traditional historiography, some modern historians have suggested the Tang imperial family might have modified its genealogy to conceal their Xianbei heritage.[22][23]

Emperor Gaozu (born Li Yuan) was the founder of the Tang. He was previously Duke of Tang and governor of Taiyuan, the capital of modern Shanxi, during the collapse of the Sui dynasty (581–618).[15][24] Li had prestige and military experience, and was a first cousin of Emperor Yang of Sui (their mothers were both one of the Dugu sisters).[10] Li Yuan rose in rebellion in 617, along with his son and his equally militant daughter Princess Pingyang (d. 623), who raised and commanded her own troops. In winter 617, Li Yuan occupied Chang'an, relegated Emperor Yang to the position of Taishang Huang ('retired emperor'), and acted as regent to the puppet child-emperor Yang You.[25] On the news of Emperor Yang's murder by General Yuwen Huaji on June 18, 618, Li Yuan declared himself emperor of the newly founded Tang dynasty.[25][26]

Emperor Gaozu ruled until 626, when he was forcefully deposed by his son Li Shimin, the Prince of Qin. Li Shimin had commanded troops since the age of 18, had prowess with bow and arrow, sword and lance and was known for his effective cavalry charges.[10][27] Fighting a numerically superior army, he defeated Dou Jiande (573–621) at Luoyang in the Battle of Hulao on May 28, 621.[28][29] Due to fear of assassination, Li Shimin ambushed and killed two of his brothers, Li Yuanji (b. 603) and crown prince Li Jiancheng (b. 589), in the Xuanwu Gate Incident on July 2, 626.[30] Shortly thereafter, his father abdicated in his favour, and Li Shimin ascended the throne. He is conventionally known by his temple name Taizong.[10]

Although killing two brothers and deposing his father contradicted the Confucian value of filial piety,[30] Taizong showed himself to be a capable leader who listened to the advice of the wisest members of his council.[10] In 628, Emperor Taizong held a Buddhist memorial service for the casualties of war; in 629, he had Buddhist monasteries erected at the sites of major battles so that monks could pray for the fallen on both sides of the fight.[31]

During the Tang campaign against the Eastern Turks, the Eastern Turkic Khaganate was destroyed after the capture of its ruler, Illig Qaghan by the famed Tang military officer Li Jing (571–649), who later became a Chancellor of the Tang dynasty. With this victory, the Turks accepted Taizong as their khagan, a title rendered as Tian Kehan in addition to his rule as emperor of China under the traditional title "Son of Heaven".[32][33] Taizong was succeeded by his son Li Zhi (as Emperor Gaozong) in 649.

Tang circuits (; dào) in 742 according to The Cambridge History of China
Tang emissaries to the Sogdian king Varkhuman in Samarkand (648–651) – Afrasiab murals
7th-century Sogdian Huteng dancer – Xiuding temple pagoda, Anyang, Henan

The Tang engaged in military campaigns against the Western Turks, exploiting the rivalry between Western and Eastern Turks in order to weaken both. Under Emperor Taizong, campaigns were dispatched in the Western Regions against Gaochang in 640, Karasahr in 644 and 648, and Kucha in 648. The wars against the Western Turks continued under Emperor Gaozong, and the Western Turkic Khaganate was finally annexed after General Su Dingfang's defeat of Khagan Ashina Helu in 657. Around this time, the Tang court enjoyed visits by numerous dignitaries from foreign lands. These were depicted in the Portraits of Periodical Offering, probably painted by Yan Liben (601–673).[34][c]

Foreign ambassadors visiting the Tang court – the Portraits of Periodical Offering by Yan Liben (601–673)

Wu Zetian's usurpation

[edit]
Wu Zetian, the sole recognised empress regnant in Chinese history

Having entered Emperor Gaozong's court as a lowly consort, Wu Zetian ultimately acceded to the highest position of power in 690, establishing the short-lived Wu Zhou. Emperor Gaozong suffered a stroke in 655, and Wu began to make many of his court decisions for him, discussing affairs of state with his councillors, who took orders from her while she sat behind a screen.[35] When Empress Wu's eldest son, the crown prince, began to assert his authority and advocate policies opposed by Empress Wu, he suddenly died in 675. Many suspected he was poisoned by Empress Wu. Although the next heir apparent kept a lower profile, Wu accused him of plotting a rebellion in 680; he was banished and later obliged to commit suicide.[36]

In 683, Emperor Gaozong died and was succeeded by Emperor Zhongzong, his eldest surviving son by Wu. Zhongzong tried to appoint his wife's father as chancellor: after only six weeks on the throne, he was deposed by Empress Wu in favour of his younger brother, Emperor Ruizong.[36] This provoked a group of Tang princes to rebel in 684. Wu's armies suppressed them within two months.[36] She proclaimed the Tianshou era of Wu Zhou on October 16, 690,[37] and three days later demoted Emperor Ruizong to crown prince. He was also forced to give up his father's surname Li in favour of the Empress Wu.[38] She then ruled as China's only empress regnant in history.

Model of Luoyang imperial palace during Wu Zetian's reign. Many major construction projects were commissioned during Wu Zetian's time, such as the Bright Hall [zh] of Luoyang (right) commissioned by Wu Zetian (original 93 m (305 ft) tall).[39]

A palace coup (Shenlong Coup [zh]) on February 20, 705, forced Empress Wu to yield her position on February 22. The next day, her son Zhongzong was restored to power; the Tang was formally restored on March 3. She died soon after.[40] To legitimise her rule, she circulated a document known as the Great Cloud Sutra, which predicted that a reincarnation of the Maitreya Buddha would be a female monarch who would dispel illness, worry, and disaster from the world.[41][42] She even introduced numerous revised written characters for the language, though they reverted to the original forms after her death.[43] Arguably the most important part of her legacy was diminishing the hegemony of the Northwestern aristocracy, allowing people from other clans and regions of China to become more represented in Chinese politics and government.[44][45]

Emperor Xuanzong's reign

[edit]
西安大雁塔
The Giant Wild Goose Pagoda in Chang'an, built in 652 and repaired by Wu Zetian in 704
Xi'anwildgoosepagoda2
The Small Wild Goose Pagoda, built by 709, was adjacent to the Dajianfu Temple in Chang'an, where Buddhist monks gathered to translate Sanskrit texts into Chinese[46]
Mural depicting Tang architecture constructed in 707–710 – Mogao Grotto Cave 217

There were many prominent women at court during and after Wu's reign, including Shangguan Wan'er (664–710), a poet, writer, and trusted official in charge of Wu's private office.[47] In 706, the wife of Emperor Zhongzong of Tang, Empress Wei (d. 710), persuaded her husband to staff government offices with his sister and her daughters, and in 709 requested that he grant women the right to bequeath hereditary privileges to their sons (which before was a male right only).[48] Empress Wei eventually poisoned Zhongzong, whereupon she placed his fifteen-year-old son upon the throne in 710. Two weeks later, Li Longji (the later Emperor Xuanzong) entered the palace with a few followers and slew Empress Wei and her faction. He then installed his father Emperor Ruizong (r. 710–712) on the throne.[49] Just as Emperor Zhongzong was dominated by Empress Wei, so too was Ruizong dominated by Princess Taiping.[50] This ended when Princess Taiping's coup failed in 712, and Emperor Ruizong abdicated to Emperor Xuanzong.[49][48]

The Tang reached its height during Emperor Xuanzong's 44-year reign, which has been characterized as a golden age of economic prosperity and pleasant lifestyles within the imperial court.[51][45] Xuanzong was seen as a progressive and benevolent ruler, having abolished the death penalty in 747. Previously, all executions had to be approved by the emperor; in 730, there were only 24 executions.[52] Xuanzong bowed to the consensus of his ministers on policy decisions and made efforts to staff government ministries fairly with different political factions.[50] His staunch Confucian chancellor Zhang Jiuling (673–740) worked to reduce deflation and increase the money supply by upholding the use of private coinage, while his aristocratic and technocratic successor Li Linfu (d. 753) favoured government monopoly over the issuance of coinage.[53] After 737, most of Xuanzong's confidence rested in Li Linfu, his long-standing chancellor, who championed a more aggressive foreign policy employing non-Chinese generals. This policy ultimately created the conditions for a massive rebellion against Xuanzong.[54]

An Lushan rebellion and catastrophe

[edit]

Previously at the height of their power, the An Lushan rebellion (755–763) ultimately destroyed the prosperity of the Tang. An Lushan was a half-Sogdian, half-Turkic Tang commander since 744, who had experience fighting the Khitans of Manchuria with a victory in 744, yet most of his campaigns against the Khitans were unsuccessful.[55] He was given great responsibility in Hebei, which allowed him to rebel with an army of more than 100,000 troops. After capturing Luoyang, he named himself emperor of a new, but short-lived, Yan state. Despite early victories scored by the Tang general Guo Ziyi (697–781), the newly recruited troops of the army at the capital were no match for An Lushan's frontier veterans; the court fled Chang'an. While the heir apparent raised troops in Shanxi and Xuanzong fled to Sichuan, they called upon the help of the Uyghur Khaganate in 756. The Uyghur khan Moyanchur was greatly excited at this prospect, and married his own daughter to the Chinese diplomatic envoy once he arrived, receiving in turn a Chinese princess as his bride. The Uyghurs helped recapture the Tang capital from the rebels, but they refused to leave until the Tang paid them an enormous sum of tribute in silk. Even Abbasid Arabs assisted the Tang in putting down the rebellion.[56][57][58] A massacre of foreign Arab and Persian Muslim merchants by Tian Shengong happened during the An Lushan rebellion in the 760 Yangzhou massacre.[59][60] The Tibetans took hold of the opportunity and raided many areas under Chinese control, and even after the Tibetan Empire had fallen apart in 842, followed soon after by the Uyghur Kingdom of Qocho, the Tang were in no position to reconquer Central Asia after 763.[56][61] So significant was this loss that half a century later jinshi examination candidates were required to write an essay on the causes of the Tang's decline.[62] Although An Lushan was killed by one of his eunuchs in 757, this time of troubles and widespread insurrection continued until rebel Shi Siming was killed by his own son in 763.[63]

Construction of the Leshan Giant Buddha began in 713 and was completed in 803. The statue is 71 m (233 ft) high.
The Nanchan Temple built during the late 8th century

After 710, regional military governors called jiedushi gradually came to challenge the power of the central government.[64] After the An Lushan rebellion, the autonomous power and authority accumulated by the jiedushi in Hebei went beyond the central government's control. After a series of rebellions between 781 and 784 in present-day Hebei, Henan, Shandong, and Hubei, the government had to officially acknowledge the jiedushi's hereditary rule without accreditation. The Tang government relied on these governors and their armies for protection and to suppress local revolts. In return, the central government would acknowledge the rights of these governors to maintain their army, collect taxes and even to pass on their title to heirs.[65] As time passed, these military governors slowly phased out the prominence of civil officials drafted by exams, and became more autonomous from central authority. The rule of these powerful military governors lasted until 960, when a new civil order under the Song dynasty was established. The abandonment of the equal-field system also meant that people could buy and sell land freely; many poor fell into debt because of this and were forced to sell their land to the wealthy, which led to the exponential growth of large estates.[56] With the breakdown of the land allocation system after 755, the central Chinese state barely interfered in agricultural management and acted merely as tax collector for roughly a millennium, save a few instances such as the Song's failed land nationalisation during the 13th-century war with the Mongols.[66]

With the central government collapsing in authority over the various regions of the empire, it was recorded in 845 that bandits and river pirates in parties of 100 or more began plundering settlements along the Yangtze River with little resistance. In 858, massive floods along the Grand Canal inundated vast tracts of land and terrain of the North China Plain, which drowned tens of thousands of people in the process. The Chinese belief in the Mandate of Heaven granted to the ailing Tang was also challenged when natural disasters led many to believe that the Tang had lost their right to rule. In 873, a disastrous harvest shook the foundations of the empire; in some areas only half of all agricultural produce was gathered, and tens of thousands faced famine and starvation. In the earlier period of the Tang, the central government was able to meet crises in the harvest—from 714 to 719, records show that the Tang government responded effectively to natural disasters by extending the price-regulation granary system throughout the country. The central government was able then to build a large surplus stock of foods to ward off the rising danger of famine and increased agricultural productivity through land reclamation.[51][67]

Rebuilding and recovery

[edit]
Xumi Pagoda, built in 636

Although these natural calamities and rebellions stained the reputation and hampered the effectiveness of the central government, the early 9th century is nonetheless viewed as a period of recovery for the Tang.[68] The government's withdrawal from its role in managing the economy had the unintended effect of stimulating trade, as more markets with fewer bureaucratic restrictions were opened up.[69][70] By 780, the old grain tax and labour service of the 7th century were replaced by a semi-annual tax paid in cash, signifying the shift to a money economy boosted by the merchant class.[58] Cities in the southern Jiangnan region such as Yangzhou, Suzhou, and Hangzhou prospered the most economically during the late Tang period.[69] The government monopoly on salt production, weakened after the An Lushan rebellion, was placed under the Salt Commission, which became one of the most powerful state agencies, run by capable ministers chosen as specialists. The commission began the practice of selling merchants the rights to buy monopoly salt, which they transported and sold in local markets. In 799, salt accounted for over half of the government's revenues.[56] S. A. M. Adshead writes that this salt tax represents "the first time that an indirect tax, rather than tribute, levies on land or people, or profit from state enterprises such as mines, had been the primary resource of a major state".[71] Even after the power of the central government was in decline after the mid-8th century, it was still able to function and give out imperial orders on a massive scale. The Old Book of Tang (945) recorded that a government decree issued in 828 standardised the use of square-pallet chain pumps for irrigation throughout the country.[72]

The last ambitious ruler of the Tang was Emperor Xianzong (r. 805–820), whose reign was aided by the fiscal reforms of the 780s, including a government monopoly on the salt industry. He also had an effective and well-trained imperial army stationed at the capital led by his court eunuchs; this was the Army of Divine Strategy, numbering 240,000 in strength as recorded in 798. Between 806 and 819, Emperor Xianzong conducted seven major military campaigns to quell the rebellious provinces that had claimed autonomy from central authority, managing to subdue all but two of them. Under his reign, there was a brief end to the hereditary jiedushi, as Xianzong appointed his own military officers and staffed the regional bureaucracies once again with civil officials.[73] However, Xianzong's successors proved less capable and more interested in the leisure of hunting, feasting, and playing outdoor sports, allowing eunuchs to amass more power as drafted scholar-officials caused strife in the bureaucracy with factional parties.[74] The eunuchs' power was not challenged following the Ganlu Incident, where Emperor Wenzong (r. 826–840) failed in his plot to have them overthrown; instead, Wenzong's allies were publicly executed in Chang'an's West Market on the eunuchs' command.[69]

A late Tang mural commemorating the victory of General Zhang Yichao over the Tibetan Empire in 848 – from Mogao cave 156

Decades after the An Lushan rebellion, the Tang was able to muster enough power to launch offensive military campaigns, including its destruction of the Uyghur Khaganate in Mongolia from 840 to 847.[75] The Tang managed to restore indirect control over former territories as far west as the Hexi Corridor and Dunhuang in Gansu; in 848, the general Zhang Yichao (799–872) managed to wrestle control of the region from the Tibetan Empire during its civil war.[76] Shortly afterwards, Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (r. 846–859) acknowledged Zhang as the protector (防禦使; fángyùshǐ) of Sha Prefecture, and military governor of the new Guiyi Circuit.[77]

End of the dynasty

[edit]

In addition to factors like natural calamity and jiedushi claiming autonomy, a rebellion by Huang Chao (874–884) devastated both northern and southern China, took an entire decade to suppress, and resulted in the sacking of both Chang'an and Luoyang.[78] In 878–879, Huang's army committed a massacre in the southern port of Guangzhou against foreign Arab and Persian Muslim, Zoroastrian, Jewish and Christian merchants.[79] A medieval Chinese source claimed that Huang Chao killed eight million people.[80] The Tang never recovered from Huang's rebellion, which paved the way for the later overthrow of the dynasty. Large groups of bandits in the size of small armies ravaged the countryside in the last years of Tang. They smuggled illicit salt, ambushed merchants and convoys, and even besieged several walled cities.[81]

Although older accounts described the Huang Chao uprising as marking the "destruction" of the Tang aristocracy, recent scholarship shows that the decline of the aristocratic advantage in officeholding had been underway long before the rebellion.[82][83][84] Furthermore, the exact extent of the physical damage of the rebellion to the Tang elite has also been overstated. Zhou Ding (2024) argues that numerous clans re-established themselves in the Jiangnan and other southern provinces, maintaining local influence well into the tenth century.[84] Amid the sacking of cities and continuing factional strife among eunuchs and officials, however, the court’s fiscal and administrative collapse left many of the old metropolitan families impoverished or displaced, setting the stage for the emergence of a new regional gentry under the Five Dynasties and Song.[85][86][84]

During the last two decades of the Tang dynasty, the gradual collapse of central authority led to the rise of the rival military figures Li Keyong and Zhu Wen in northern China.[87] Tang forces had defeated Huang's rebellion with the aid of allied Shatuo, a Turkic people of what is now Shanxi, led by Li Keyong. He was made a jiedushi, and later Prince of Jin, bestowed with the imperial surname Li by the Tang court.[88] Zhu Wen, originally a salt smuggler who served as a lieutenant under the rebel Huang Chao, surrendered to Tang forces. By helping to defeat Huang, he was renamed Zhu Quanzhong ("Zhu of Perfect Loyalty") and granted a rapid series of promotions to military governor of Xuanwu Circuit.[89][90]

In 901, from his power base of Kaifeng, Zhu Wen seized control of the Tang capital Chang'an and with it the imperial family.[91] By 903, he forced Emperor Zhaozong of Tang to move the capital to Luoyang, preparing to take the throne for himself. In 904, Zhu assassinated Emperor Zhaozong to replace him with the emperor's young son Emperor Ai of Tang. In 905, Zhu executed the brothers of Emperor Ai as well as many officials and Empress Dowager He. In 907, the Tang dynasty was ended when Zhu deposed Ai and took the throne for himself (known posthumously as Emperor Taizu of Later Liang). He established the Later Liang, which inaugurated the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. A year later, Zhu had the deposed Emperor Ai poisoned to death.[89]

Zhu Wen's enemy Li Keyong died in 908, having never claimed the title of emperor out of loyalty to the Tang. His son Li Cunxu (Emperor Zhuangzong) inherited his title Prince of Jin along with his father's rivalry against Zhu. In 923, Li Cunxu declared a "restored" Tang dynasty, the Later Tang, before toppling the Later Liang dynasty the same year. However, southern China remained splintered into various small kingdoms until most of China was reunified under the Song dynasty (960–1279). Control over parts of northeast China and Manchuria by the Liao dynasty of the Khitan people also stemmed from this period. In 905, their leader Abaoji formed a military alliance with Li Keyong against Zhu Wen but the Khitans eventually turned against the Later Tang, helping another Shatuo leader Shi Jingtang of Later Jin to overthrow Later Tang in 936.[92]

Administration and politics

[edit]

Initial reforms

[edit]
Emperor Xuanzong of Tang wearing the robes and hat of a scholar

Taizong set out to solve internal problems within the government which had constantly plagued past dynasties. Building upon the Sui legal code, he issued a new legal code that subsequent Chinese dynasties would model theirs upon, as well as neighbouring polities in Vietnam, Korea, and Japan.[10] The earliest law code to survive was established in 653; it was divided into 500 articles specifying different crimes and penalties ranging from ten blows with a light stick, one hundred blows with a heavy rod, exile, penal servitude, or execution. The legal code distinguished different levels of severity in meted punishments when different members of the social and political hierarchy committed the same crime. For example, the severity of punishment was different when a servant or nephew killed a master or an uncle than when a master or uncle killed a servant or nephew.[93]

Tang tomb figure of an official dressed in hanfu. He is depicted with a tall hat, wide-sleeved belted outer garment, and a rectangular "kerchief" in front. A white inner gown hangs over his square shoes, and he holds a tablet containing a report to his superiors to his chest.

The Tang Code was largely retained by later codes such as the early Ming dynasty (1368–1644) code of 1397,[94] yet there were several revisions in later times, such as improved property rights for women during the Song dynasty (960–1279).[95][96]

The Tang had three departments (; shěng), which were obliged to draft, review, and implement policies respectively. There were also six ministries (; ) under the administrations that implemented policy, each of which was assigned different tasks. These Three Departments and Six Ministries included the personnel administration, finance, rites, military, justice, and public works—an administrative model which lasted until the fall of the Qing dynasty (1644–1912).[97]

Although the founders of the Tang related to the glory of the earlier Han dynasty (202 BC – 220 AD), the basis for much of their administrative organisation was very similar to the previous Northern and Southern dynasties. The Northern Zhou (6th century) fubing system of divisional militia was continued by the Tang, along with farmer-soldiers serving in rotation from the capital or frontier in order to receive appropriated farmland. The equal-field system of the Northern Wei (4th–6th centuries) was also kept, although there were a few modifications.[10]

Although the central and local governments kept an enormous number of records about land property in order to assess taxes, it became common practice in the Tang for literate and affluent people to create their own private documents and signed contracts. These had their own signature and that of a witness and scribe in order to prove in court (if necessary) that their claim to property was legitimate. The prototype of this actually existed since the ancient Han dynasty, while contractual language became even more common and embedded into Chinese literary culture in later dynasties.[98]

The centre of the political power of the Tang was the capital city of Chang'an (modern Xi'an), where the emperor maintained his large palace quarters and entertained political emissaries with music, sports, acrobats, poetry, paintings, and dramatic theatre performances. The capital was also filled with incredible amounts of riches and resources to spare. When the Chinese prefectural government officials travelled to the capital in 643 to give the annual report of the affairs in their districts, Emperor Taizong discovered that many had no proper quarters to rest in and were renting rooms with merchants. Therefore, Emperor Taizong ordered the government agencies in charge of municipal construction to build every visiting official his own private mansion in the capital.[99]

Imperial examinations

[edit]
A Ming-era painting by Qiu Ying depicting candidates for civil service gathered around the wall where examination results had been posted

Students of Confucian studies were candidates for the imperial examinations, which qualified their graduates for appointment to the local, provincial, and central government bureaucracies. Two types of exams were given, mingjing (明經; 'illuminating the classics') and jinshi (進士; 'presented scholar'). The mingjing was based upon the Confucian classics and tested the student's knowledge of a broad variety of texts. The jinshi tested a student's literary abilities in writing essays in response to questions on governance and politics, as well as in composing poetry.[100] Candidates were also judged on proper deportment, appearance, speech, and calligraphy, all subjective criteria that favoured the wealthy over those of more modest means who were unable to pay tutors of rhetoric and writing. Although a disproportionate number of civil officials came from aristocratic families, wealth and noble status were not prerequisites, and the exams were open to all male subjects whose fathers were not of the artisan or merchant classes.[101][102] To promote widespread Confucian education, the Tang government established state-run schools and issued standard versions of the Five Classics with commentaries.[103]

Open competition was designed to draw the best talent into government. But perhaps an even greater consideration for the Tang rulers was to avoid imperial dependence on powerful aristocratic families and warlords by recruiting a body of career officials having no family or local power base. The Tang law code ensured equal division of inherited property among legitimate heirs, encouraging social mobility by preventing powerful families from becoming landed nobility through primogeniture.[104] Contrary to older accounts that portrayed the imperial examination as marginal in Tang times, recent quantitative research shows that by the late seventh century the jinshi degree had already become the primary route to high office, while aristocratic family pedigree had largely lost its predictive power for bureaucratic appointment.[82][105][83] The Tang examination system thus played a decisive institutional role in displacing hereditary privilege and fostering a bureaucratic elite selected by merit. From Tang times until the end of the Qing dynasty in 1912, scholar-officials served as intermediaries between the people and the government, their authority deriving less from lineage than from examination success.

Although the system was later further expanded under the Song, the essential transformation from aristocratic to bureaucratic governance had already taken shape during the Tang dynasty.[82][106]


Religion and politics

[edit]
Emperor Xuanzong of Tang giving audience to Zhang Guo, by Ren Renfa (1254–1327)

From the outset, religion played a role in Tang politics. In his bid for power, Li Yuan had attracted a following by claiming descent from the Taoist sage Laozi (fl. 6th century BC).[107] People bidding for office would request the prayers of Buddhist monks, with successful aspirants making donations in return. Before the persecution of Buddhism in the 9th century, Buddhism and Taoism were both accepted. Religion was central in the reign of Emperor Xuanzong (r. 712–756). The Emperor invited Taoist and Buddhist monks and clerics to his court, exalted Laozi with grand titles, wrote commentary on Taoist scriptures, and set up a school to prepare candidates for Taoist examinations. In 726, he called upon the Indian monk Vajrabodhi (671–741) to perform tantric rites to avert a drought. In 742, he personally held the incense burner while patriarch of the Shingon school Amoghavajra (705–774) recited "mystical incantations to secure the victory of Tang forces".[49]

Emperor Xuanzong closely regulated religious finances. Near the beginning of his reign in 713, he liquidated the Inexhaustible Treasury of a prominent Buddhist monastery in Chang'an which had collected vast riches as multitudes of anonymous repentants left money, silk, and treasure at its doors. Although the monastery used its funds generously, the Emperor condemned it for fraudulent banking practices, and distributed its wealth to other Buddhist and Taoist monasteries, and to repair local statues, halls, and bridges.[108] In 714, he forbade Chang'an shops from selling copied Buddhist sutras, giving a monopoly of this trade to the Buddhist clergy.[109]

Taxes and the census

[edit]

The Tang government attempted to create an accurate census of the empire's population, mostly for effective taxation and military conscription. The early Tang government established modest grain and cloth taxes on each household, persuading households to register and provide the government with accurate demographic information.[10] In the official census of 609, the population was tallied at 9 million households, about 50 million people,[10] and this number did not increase in the census of 742.[110] Patricia Ebrey writes that nonwithstanding census undercounting, China's population had not grown significantly since the earlier Han dynasty, which recorded 58 million people in 2 AD.[10][111] Adshead disagrees, estimating about 75 million people by 750.[112]

In the Tang census of 754, there were 1,859 cities, 321 prefectures, and 1,538 counties throughout the empire.[113] Although there were many large and prominent cities, the rural and agrarian areas comprised 80–90% of the population.[114] There was also a dramatic migration from northern to southern China, as the North held 75% of the overall population at the dynasty's inception, which by its end was reduced to 50%.[115] The Chinese population would not dramatically increase until the Song dynasty, when it doubled to 100 million because of extensive rice cultivation in central and southern China, coupled with higher yields of grain sold in a growing market.[116]

Military and foreign policy

[edit]
Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649) receives Gar Tongtsen Yülsung, ambassador of the Tibetan Empire, at his court – later copy of an original painted in 641 by Yan Liben (600–673)

Protectorates and tributaries

[edit]

The 7th and first half of the 8th century are generally considered to be the era in which the Tang reached the zenith of its power. In this period, Tang control extended further west than any previous dynasty, stretching from north Vietnam in the south, to a point north of Kashmir bordering Persia in the west, to northern Korea in the north-east.[117]

Some of the kingdoms paying tribute to the Tang dynasty included Kashmir, Nepal, Khotan, Kucha, Kashgar, Silla, Champa, and kingdoms located in Amu Darya and Syr Darya valley.[118][119] Turkic nomads addressed the Tang emperor as Tian Kehan.[33] After the widespread Göktürk revolt of Shabolüe Khan (d. 658) was put down at Issyk Kul in 657 by Su Dingfang (591–667), Emperor Gaozong established several protectorates governed by a Protectorate General or Grand Protectorate General, which extended the Chinese sphere of influence as far as Herat in Western Afghanistan.[120] Protectorate Generals were given a great deal of autonomy to handle local crises without waiting for central admission. After Xuanzong's reign, jiedushi were given enormous power, including the ability to maintain their own armies, collect taxes, and pass their titles on hereditarily. This is commonly recognised as the beginning of the fall of Tang's central government.[56][64]

Chinese officer of the Guard of Honour in the Tomb of Princess Chang-le (长乐公主墓) – Zhao Mausoleum, Shaanxi

Soldiers and conscription

[edit]

By 737, Emperor Xuanzong discarded the policy of conscripting soldiers that were replaced every three years, replacing them with long-service soldiers who were more battle-hardened and efficient. It was more economically feasible as well, since training new recruits and sending them out to the frontier every three years drained the treasury.[121] By the late 7th century, the fubing troops began abandoning military service and the homes provided to them in the equal-field system. The supposed standard of 100 mu of land allotted to each family was in fact decreasing in size in places where population expanded and the wealthy bought up most of the land. Hard-pressed peasants and vagrants were then induced into military service with benefits of exemption from both taxation and corvée labour service, as well as provisions for farmland and dwellings for dependents who accompanied soldiers on the frontier.[122] By 742, the total number of enlisted troops in the Tang armies had risen to about 500,000 men.[121]

Eastern regions

[edit]

In East Asia, Tang military campaigns were less successful elsewhere than in previous imperial Chinese dynasties. Like the emperors of the Sui dynasty before him, Taizong established a military campaign in 644 against the Korean kingdom of Goguryeo in the Goguryeo–Tang War; however, this led to its withdrawal in the first campaign because they failed to overcome the successful defence led by General Yŏn Kaesomun. The Tang entered into the Silla–Tang alliance, the Chinese fought against Baekje and their Yamato Japanese allies in the Battle of Baekgang in August 663, a decisive Tang–Silla victory. The Tang dynasty navy had several different ship types at its disposal to engage in naval warfare, these ships described by Li Quan in his Taipai Yinjing (Canon of the White and Gloomy Planet of War) of 759.[123] The Battle of Baekgang was actually a restoration movement by remnant forces of Baekje, since their kingdom was toppled in 660 by a Tang–Silla invasion, led by Chinese general Su Dingfang and Korean general Kim Yushin (595–673). In another joint invasion with Silla, the Tang army severely weakened the Goguryeo Kingdom in the north by taking out its outer forts in 645. With joint attacks by Silla and Tang armies under commander Li Shiji (594–669), the Kingdom of Goguryeo was destroyed by 668.[124]

A 10th-century mural painting in the Mogao Caves at Dunhuang showing monastic architecture from Mount Wutai, Tang dynasty; Japanese architecture of this period was influenced by Tang Chinese architecture

Although they were formerly enemies, the Tang accepted officials and generals of Goguryeo into their administration and military, such as the brothers Yŏn Namsaeng (634–679) and Yŏn Namsan (639–701). From 668 to 676, the Tang Empire controlled northern Korea. However, Silla broke the alliance in 671, and began the Silla–Tang War to expel the Tang forces. At the same time the Tang faced threats on its western border when a large Chinese army was defeated by the Tibetans on the Dafei River in 670. By 676, the Tang army was expelled out of Korea by a unified Silla.[125] Following a revolt of the Eastern Turks in 679, the Tang abandoned its Korean campaigns.[126]

Although the Tang had fought the Japanese, they still held cordial relations with Japan. There were numerous Imperial embassies to China from Japan, diplomatic missions that were not halted until 894 by Emperor Uda (r. 887–897), upon persuasion by Sugawara no Michizane (845–903).[127] The Japanese Emperor Tenmu (r. 672–686) even established his conscripted army on that of the Chinese model, based his state ceremonies on the Chinese model, and constructed his palace at Fujiwara on the Chinese model of architecture.[128]

Many Chinese Buddhist monks came to Japan to help further the spread of Buddhism as well. Two 7th-century monks, Zhi Yu and Zhi You, visited the court of Emperor Tenji (r. 661–672), whereupon they presented a gift of a south-pointing chariot that they had crafted.[129] This vehicle employing a differential gear was reproduced in several models for Tenji in 666, as recorded in the Nihon Shoki (720).[129] Japanese monks also visited China; such was the case with Ennin (794–864), who wrote of his travel experiences including travels along the Grand Canal.[130][131] The Japanese monk Enchin (814–891) stayed in China from 839 to 847, and again from 853 to 858, landing near Fuzhou, Fujian and setting sail for Japan from Taizhou, Zhejiang during his second trip to China.[132][73]

Western and Northern regions

[edit]
Tomb figure of mounted warrior similar to the one unearthed from the tomb of crown prince Li Chongrun
Tang Dynasty circa 700 CE
Tang Dynasty circa 700 CE

The Sui and Tang carried out successful military campaigns against the steppe nomads. Chinese foreign policy to the north and west now had to deal with Turkic nomads, who were becoming the most dominant ethnic group in Central Asia.[133][134] To handle and avoid any threats posed by the Turks, the Sui government repaired fortifications and received their trade and tribute missions.[135] They sent four royal princesses to form heqin marriage alliances with Turkic clan leaders, in 597, 599, 614, and 617. The Sui stirred trouble and conflict among ethnic groups against the Turks.[136][137] As early as the Sui dynasty, the Turks had become a major militarised force employed by the Chinese. When the Khitans began raiding northeast China in 605, a Chinese general led 20,000 Turks against them, distributing Khitan livestock and women to the Turks as a reward.[138] On two occasions between 635 and 636, Tang royal princesses were married to Turk mercenaries or generals in Chinese service.[137] Throughout the Tang dynasty until the end of 755, there were approximately ten Turkic generals serving under the Tang.[139][140] While most of the Tang army was made of fubing Chinese conscripts, the majority of the troops led by Turkic generals were of non-Chinese origin, campaigning largely in the western frontier where the presence of fubing troops was low.[141] Some "Turkic" troops were tribalised Han Chinese, a desinicised people.[142]

Civil war in China was almost totally diminished by 626, along with the 628 defeat of the Ordos warlord Liang Shidu; after these internal conflicts, the Tang began an offensive against the Turks.[143] In 630, Tang armies captured areas of the Ordos Desert, modern-day Inner Mongolia province, and southern Mongolia from the Turks.[138][144] After this military victory, On June 11, 631, Emperor Taizong also sent envoys to the Xueyantuo bearing gold and silk in order to persuade the release of enslaved Chinese prisoners who were captured during the transition from Sui to Tang from the northern frontier; this embassy succeeded in freeing 80,000 Chinese men and women who were then returned to China.[145][146]

Tang Tomb guardian, early 8th century

While the Turks were settled in the Ordos region (former territory of the Xiongnu), the Tang government took on the military policy of dominating the central steppe. As during the earlier Han dynasty, the Tang and their Turkic allies conquered and subdued Central Asia during the 640s and 650s.[135] During Emperor Taizong's reign alone, large campaigns were launched against not only the Göktürks, but also separate campaigns against the Tuyuhun, the oasis states, and the Xueyantuo. Under Emperor Gaozong, a campaign led by the general Su Dingfang was launched against the Western Turks ruled by Ashina Helu.[147]

The Tang Empire competed with the Tibetan Empire for control of areas in Inner and Central Asia, which was at times settled with marriage alliances such as the marrying of Princess Wencheng (d. 680) to Songtsän Gampo (d. 649).[148][149] A Tibetan tradition mentions that Chinese troops captured Lhasa after Songtsän Gampo's death,[150] but no such invasion is mentioned in either Chinese annals or the Tibetan manuscripts of Dunhuang.[151]

There was a string of conflicts with Tibet over territories in the Tarim Basin between 670 and 692; in 763, the Tibetans captured Chang'an for fifteen days during the An Lushan rebellion.[152][153] In fact, it was during this rebellion that the Tang withdrew its western garrisons stationed in what is now Gansu and Qinghai, which the Tibetans then occupied along with the territory of what is now Xinjiang.[154] Hostilities between the Tang and Tibet continued until they signed the Changqing Treaty in 821.[155] The terms of this treaty, including the fixed borders between the two countries, are recorded in a bilingual inscription on a stone pillar outside the Jokhang temple in Lhasa.[156]

A bas relief of a soldier and the emperor's horse, Autumn Dew, with elaborate saddle and stirrups, designed by Yan Liben, from the tomb of Emperor Taizong c. 650

During the Islamic conquest of Persia (633–656), the son of the last ruler of the Sasanian Empire, Prince Peroz and his court moved to Tang China.[118][157] According to the Old Book of Tang, Peroz was made the head of a Governorate of Persia in present-day Zaranj, Afghanistan. During this conquest of Persia, the Rashidun Caliph Uthman (r. 644–656) sent an embassy to the Tang court at Chang'an.[140] Arab sources claim Umayyad commander Qutayba ibn Muslim briefly took Kashgar from China and withdrew after an agreement,[158] but modern historians entirely dismiss this claim.[159][160][161] The Arab Umayyad Caliphate in 715 deposed Ikhshid, the king the Fergana Valley, and installed a new king Alutar on the throne. The deposed king fled to Kucha (seat of Anxi Protectorate), and sought Chinese intervention. The Chinese sent 10,000 troops under Zhang Xiaosong to Ferghana. He defeated Alutar and the Arab occupation force at Namangan and reinstalled Ikhshid on the throne.[162] The Tang defeated the Arab Umayyad invaders at the Battle of Aksu (717). The Arab Umayyad commander Al-Yashkuri and his army fled to Tashkent after they were defeated.[163] The Turgesh then crushed the Arab Umayyads and drove them out. By the 740s, the Arabs under the Abbasid Caliphate in Khorasan had reestablished a presence in the Ferghana basin and in Sogdiana. At the Battle of Talas in 751, Karluk mercenaries under the Chinese defected, helping the Arab armies of the Caliphate to defeat the Tang force under commander Gao Xianzhi. Although the battle itself was not of the greatest significance militarily, this was a pivotal moment in history, as it marks the spread of Chinese papermaking[164][165] into regions west of China as captured Chinese soldiers shared the technique of papermaking to the Arabs. These techniques ultimately reached Europe by the 12th century through Arab-controlled Spain.[166] Although they had fought at Talas, on June 11, 758, an Abbasid embassy arrived at Chang'an simultaneously with the Uyghurs bearing gifts for the Tang emperor.[167] In 788–789 the Chinese concluded a military alliance with the Uyghur Turks who twice defeated the Tibetans, in 789 near the town of Gaochang in Dzungaria, and in 791 near Ningxia on the Yellow River.[168]

Illustration of the 643 Byzantine embassy to Tang Taizong

Joseph Needham writes that a tributary embassy came to the court of Emperor Taizong in 643 from the Patriarch of Antioch.[169] However, Friedrich Hirth and other sinologists such as S. A. M. Adshead have identified fulin (拂菻) in the Old and New Book of Tang as the Byzantine Empire, which those histories directly associated with Daqin (i.e. the Roman Empire).[170][171][172] The embassy sent in 643 by Boduoli (波多力) was identified as Byzantine ruler Constans II Pogonatos, and further embassies were recorded as being sent into the 8th century.[171][172][170] Adshead offers a different transliteration stemming from "patriarch" or "patrician", possibly a reference to one of the acting regents for the young Byzantine monarch.[173] The Old and New Book of Tang also provide a description of the Byzantine capital Constantinople,[174][175] including how it was besieged by the Da Shi (大食, i.e. the Umayyad Caliphate) forces of Mu'awiya I, who forced them to pay tribute to the Arabs.[171][176]

Economy

[edit]
A trout
A Tang gilt-silver jar, shaped in the style of a northern nomad's leather bag[177] decorated with a horse dancing with a cup of wine in its mouth, as the horses of Emperor Xuanzong were trained to do.[177]

Through use of the land trade along the Silk Road and maritime trade by sail at sea, the Tang were able to acquire and gain many new technologies, cultural practices, rare luxury, and contemporary items. From Europe, the Middle East, Central and South Asia, the Tang dynasty were able to acquire new ideas in fashion, new types of ceramics, and improved silver-smithing techniques. The Tang also gradually adopted the foreign concept of stools and chairs as seating, whereas the Chinese beforehand always sat on mats placed on the floor.[178] People of the Middle East coveted and purchased Chinese goods in bulk, including silks, porcelain, and lacquerwares.[179] Songs, dances, and musical instruments from foreign regions became popular in China during the Tang dynasty.[180][181] These musical instruments included oboes, flutes, and small lacquered drums from Kucha in the Tarim Basin, and percussion instruments from India such as cymbals.[180] At the court there were nine musical ensembles (expanded from seven in the Sui dynasty) that played eclectic Asian music.[182]

Tang Kaiyuan Tongbao coin, first minted in 621 in Chang'an, a model for the Japanese 8th-century Wadōkaichin

There was great interaction with India, a hub for Buddhist knowledge, with famous travellers such as Xuanzang (d. 664) visiting the South Asian state. After a 17-year trip, Xuanzang managed to bring back valuable Sanskrit texts to be translated into Chinese. There was also a Turkic–Chinese dictionary available for serious scholars and students, while Turkic folk songs gave inspiration to some Chinese poetry.[183][184] In the interior of China, trade was facilitated by the Grand Canal and the Tang government's rationalisation of the greater canal system that reduced costs of transporting grain and other commodities.[51] The state also managed roughly 32,100 km (19,900 mi) of postal service routes by horse or boat.[185]

Silk Road

[edit]
A 723 Tang sancai statuette of Sogdian musicians riding on a Bactrian camel

Although the Silk Road from China to Europe and the Western world was initially formulated during the reign of Emperor Wu (141–87 BC) during the Han, it was reopened by the Tang in 639, when Hou Junji (d. 643) conquered the West, and remained open for almost four decades. It was closed after the Tibetans captured it in 678, but in 699, the Silk Road reopened when the Tang reconquered the Four Garrisons of Anxi originally installed in 640,[186] once again connecting China directly to the West for land-based trade.[187]

The Tang captured the vital route through the Gilgit valley from Tibet in 722, lost it to the Tibetans in 737, and regained it under the command of the Goguryeo-Korean General Gao Xianzhi.[188] When the An Lushan rebellion ended in 763, the Tang Empire withdrew its troops from its western lands, allowing the Tibetan Empire to largely cut off China's direct access to the Silk Road. An internal rebellion in 848 ousted the Tibetan rulers, and the Tang regained the northwestern prefectures from Tibet in 851. These lands contained crucial grazing areas and pastures for raising horses that the Tang dynasty desperately needed.[155][189]

Despite the many expatriate European travellers coming into China to live and trade, many travellers, mainly religious monks and missionaries, recorded China's stringent immigrant laws. As the monk Xuanzang and many other monk travellers attested to, there were many government checkpoints along the Silk Road that examined travel permits into the Tang Empire. Furthermore, banditry was a problem along the checkpoints and oasis towns, as Xuanzang also recorded that his group of travellers were assaulted by bandits on multiple occasions.[179]

The Silk Road also affected the art from the period. Horses became a significant symbol of prosperity and power as well as an instrument of military and diplomatic policy. Horses were also revered as a relative of the dragon.[190]

Seaports and maritime trade

[edit]
A contract from the Tang dynasty found in the Astana Cemetery in Turfan that records the purchase of a 15-year-old slave for six bolts of plain silk and five Chinese coins

Chinese envoys had been sailing through the Indian Ocean to states of India as early as the 2nd century BC,[191][192] yet it was during the Tang dynasty that a strong Chinese maritime presence could be found in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea, into Persia, Mesopotamia (sailing up the Euphrates River in modern-day Iraq), Arabia, Egypt, Aksum (Ethiopia), and Somalia in the Horn of Africa.[193]

During the Tang dynasty, thousands of foreign expatriate merchants came and lived in numerous Chinese cities to do business with China, including Persians, Arabs, Hindu Indians, Malays, Bengalis, Sinhalese, Khmers, Chams, Jews and Nestorian Christians of the Near East.[194][195] In 748, the Buddhist monk Jian Zhen described Guangzhou as a bustling mercantile business center where many large and impressive foreign ships came to dock. He wrote that "many large ships came from Borneo, Persia, Qunglun (Java) ... with ... spices, pearls, and jade piled up mountain high",[196][197] as written in the Yue Jue Shu (Lost Records of the State of Yue). Relations with the Arabs were often strained: When the imperial government was attempting to quell the An Lushan rebellion, Arab and Persian pirates burned and looted Canton on October 30, 758.[155] The Tang government reacted by shutting the port of Canton down for roughly five decades; thus, foreign vessels docked at Hanoi instead.[198] However, when the port reopened, it continued to thrive. In 851, the Arab merchant Sulaiman al-Tajir observed the manufacturing of porcelain in Guangzhou and admired its transparent quality.[199] He also provided a description of Guangzhou's landmarks, granaries, local government administration, some of its written records, treatment of travellers, along with the use of ceramics, rice, wine, and tea.[200] Their presence ended in the vengeful Guangzhou massacre by the rebel Huang Chao in 878, who purportedly slaughtered thousands regardless of ethnicity.[81][201][202] Huang's rebellion was eventually suppressed in 884.

Vessels from other East Asian states such as Silla, Bohai and the Hizen Province of Japan were all involved in the Yellow Sea trade, which Silla of Korea dominated. After Silla and Japan reopened renewed hostilities in the late 7th century, most Japanese maritime merchants chose to set sail from Nagasaki towards the mouth of the Huai River, the Yangtze River, and even as far south as the Hangzhou Bay in order to avoid Korean ships in the Yellow Sea.[203][204] In order to sail back to Japan in 838, the Japanese embassy to China procured nine ships and sixty Korean sailors from the Korean wards of Chuzhou and Lianshui cities along the Huai River.[205] It is also known that Chinese trade ships travelling to Japan set sail from the various ports along the coasts of Zhejiang and Fujian provinces.[206]

The Chinese engaged in large-scale production for overseas export by at least the time of the Tang. This was proven by the discovery of the Belitung shipwreck, a silt-preserved shipwrecked Arabian dhow in the Gaspar Strait near Belitung, which had 63,000 pieces of Tang ceramics, silver, and gold (including a Changsha bowl inscribed with a date corresponding to 826, roughly confirmed by radiocarbon dating of star anise at the wreck).[207] Beginning in 785, the Chinese began to call regularly at Sufala on the East African coast in order to cut out Arab middlemen,[208] with various contemporary Chinese sources giving detailed descriptions of trade in Africa. The official and geographer Jia Dan (730–805) wrote of two common sea trade routes in his day: one from the coast of the Bohai Sea towards Korea and another from Guangzhou through Malacca towards the Nicobar Islands, Sri Lanka and India, the eastern and northern shores of the Arabian Sea to the Euphrates River.[209] In 863, the Chinese author Duan Chengshi (d. 863) provided a detailed description of the slave trade, ivory trade, and ambergris trade in a country called Bobali, which historians suggest was Berbera in Somalia.[210] In Fustat, Egypt, the fame of Chinese ceramics there led to an enormous demand for Chinese goods; hence Chinese often travelled there.[211][212] From this time period, the Arab merchant Shulama once wrote of his admiration for Chinese seafaring junks, but noted that their draft was too deep for them to enter the Euphrates River, which forced them to ferry passengers and cargo in small boats. Shulama also noted that Chinese ships were often very large, with capacities up to 700 passengers.[209][213]

Culture and society

[edit]
Eighty Seven Celestials, draft painting of a fresco by Wu Daozi (c. 685 – c. 758)

Both the Sui and Tang dynasties had turned away from the more feudal culture of the preceding Northern Dynasties, in favour of staunch civil Confucianism.[10] The governmental system was supported by a large class of Confucian intellectuals selected through either civil service examinations or recommendations. In the Tang period, Taoism and Buddhism were commonly practised ideologies that played a large role in people's daily lives. The Tang Chinese enjoyed feasting, drinking, holidays, sports, and all sorts of entertainment, while Chinese literature blossomed and was more widely accessible with new printing methods. Rich commoners and nobles who worshipped spirits wanted them to know "how important and how admirable they were", so they "wrote or commissioned their own obituaries" and buried figures along with their bodies to ward off evil spirits.[214]

Chang'an

[edit]
A 706 mural depicting a corner tower, most likely one of Chang'an, from the tomb of Prince Yide (d. 701) – the Qianling Mausoleum

Although Chang'an had served as the capital during the earlier Han and Jin dynasties, after subsequent destruction in warfare, it was the Sui dynasty model that comprised the Tang-era capital. The roughly square dimensions of the city had 10 km (6.2 mi) of outer walls running east to west, and more than 8 km (5.0 mi) of outer walls running north to south.[31] The royal palace, the Taiji Palace, stood north of the city's central axis.[215] From the large Mingde Gates mid-center on the main southern wall, a wide city avenue stretched all the way north to the central administrative city, behind which was the Chentian Gate of the royal palace, or Imperial City. Intersecting this were fourteen main streets running east to west, while eleven main streets ran north to south. These main intersecting roads formed 108 rectangular wards with walls and four gates each, each filled with multiple city blocks. The city was made famous for this checkerboard pattern of main roads with walled and gated districts, its layout even mentioned in one of Du Fu's poems.[216] During the Heian period, cities like Heian-kyō (present-day Kyoto) were arranged in the checkerboard street in accordance with traditional geomancy, following the Chang'an model. Of Chang'an's 108 wards, two were designated as government-supervised markets, and other space reserved for temples, gardens, ponds, etc.[217] Throughout the entire city, there were 111 Buddhist monasteries, 41 Taoist abbeys, 38 family shrines, 2 official temples, 7 churches of foreign religions, 10 city wards with provincial transmission offices, 12 major inns, and 6 graveyards. Some city wards were literally filled with open public playing fields or the backyards of lavish mansions for playing horse polo and cuju (Chinese soccer).[218] In 662, Emperor Gaozong moved the imperial court to the Daming Palace, which became the political center of the empire and served as the royal residence of the Tang emperors for more than 220 years.[219]

Map of Chang'an during the Tang

The Tang capital was the largest city in the world at its time, with the population of its wards and suburban countryside reaching two million inhabitants.[31] The Tang capital was very cosmopolitan, with ethnicities of Persia, Central Asia, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Tibet, India, and many other places living within. Naturally, with this plethora of different ethnicities living in Chang'an, there were also many different practised religions, such as Buddhism, Nestorian Christianity, and Zoroastrianism, among others.[220] With the open access to China that the Silk Road to the west facilitated, many foreign settlers were able to move east to China, while the city of Chang'an itself had about 25,000 foreigners living within.[179] Exotic green-eyed, blond-haired Tocharian ladies serving wine in agate and amber cups, singing, and dancing at taverns attracted customers. If a foreigner in China pursued a Chinese woman for marriage, he was required to stay in China and was unable to take his bride back to his homeland, as stated in a law passed in 628 to protect women from temporary marriages with foreign envoys. Several laws enforcing segregation of foreigners from Chinese were passed during the Tang. In 779, the Tang issued an edict which forced Uyghurs in the capital, Chang'an, to wear their ethnic dress, stopped them from marrying Chinese females, and banned them from passing off as Chinese.[221]

The bronze Jingyun Bell cast in 711, 247 cm (97 in) high and weighing 6,500 kg (14,300 lb), now in the Xi'an Bell Tower

Chang'an was the center of the central government, the home of the imperial family, and was filled with splendor and wealth. However, incidentally it was not the economic hub during the Tang dynasty. The city of Yangzhou along the Grand Canal and close to the Yangtze was the greatest economic center during the Tang.[194][222]

Yangzhou was the headquarters for the Tang government's salt monopoly, and was the greatest industrial center of China. It acted as a midpoint in shipping of foreign goods to be distributed to the major cities of the north.[194] Much like the seaport of Guangzhou in the south, Yangzhou had thousands of foreign traders from across Asia.[222][223]

There was also the secondary capital city of Luoyang, which was the favoured capital of the two by Empress Wu. In 691, she had more than 100,000 families from the region around Chang'an move to Luoyang. With a population of about a million, Luoyang became the second largest city in the empire, and with its closeness to the Luo River it benefited from southern agricultural fertility and trade traffic of the Grand Canal. However, the Tang court eventually demoted its capital status and did not visit Luoyang after 743, when Chang'an's problem of acquiring adequate supplies and stores for the year was solved.[194] As early as 736, granaries were built at critical points along the route from Yangzhou to Chang'an, which eliminated shipment delays, spoilage, and pilfering. An artificial lake used as a transshipment pool was dredged east of Chang'an in 743, where curious northerners could finally see the array of boats found in southern China, delivering tax and tribute items to the imperial court.[224]

Literature

[edit]
A Tang-era copy of the preface to the Lantingji Xu poems composed at the Orchid Pavilion Gathering, originally attributed to Wang Xizhi (303–361) of the Jin dynasty
A poem by Li Bai (701–762), the only surviving example of Li Bai's calligraphy, housed in the Palace Museum in Beijing

The Tang dynasty was a golden age of Chinese literature and art. Over 48,900 poems penned during the Tang, representing over 2,200 authors, have survived to the present day.[225][226] Skill in the composition of poetry became a required study for those wishing to pass imperial examinations,[227] while poetry was also heavily competitive; poetry contests among guests at banquets and courtiers were common.[228] Poetry styles that were popular in the Tang included gushi and jintishi, with the poet Li Bai (701–762) famous for the former style, and poets like Wang Wei (701–761) and Cui Hao (704–754) famous for their use of the latter. Jintishi poetry, or regulated verse, employed stanzas of eight lines, each consisting of five or seven characters with a fixed pattern of tones, and required the second and third couplets to be antithetical.[229] Tang poems remained popular and great emulation of Tang era poetry began in the Song dynasty; in that period, Yan Yu (嚴羽; fl. 1194–1245) was the first to confer the poetry of the High Tang (c. 713 – 766) with "canonical status within the classical poetic tradition". Yan Yu reserved the position of highest esteem among all Tang poets for Du Fu (712–770), who was not viewed as such in his own era, and was branded by his peers as an anti-traditional rebel.[230]

The Classical Prose Movement was spurred in large part by the writings of Tang authors Liu Zongyuan (773–819) and Han Yu (768–824). This new prose style broke away from the poetry tradition of piantiwen (駢體文; 'parallel prose') style begun in the Han dynasty. Although writers of the Classical Prose Movement imitated piantiwen, they criticised it for its often vague content and lack of colloquial language, focusing more on clarity and precision to make their writing more direct.[231] This guwen (archaic prose) style can be traced back to Han Yu, and would become largely associated with orthodox Neo-Confucianism.[232]

Short story fiction and tales were also popular during the Tang, one of the more famous ones being Yingying's Biography by Yuan Zhen (779–831), which was widely circulated in his own time and by the Yuan dynasty (1279–1368) became the basis for Chinese opera.[233][234] Timothy C. Wong places this story within the wider context of Tang love tales, which often share the plot designs of quick passion, inescapable societal pressure leading to the abandonment of romance, followed by a period of melancholy.[235] Wong states that this scheme lacks the undying vows and total self-commitment to love found in Western romances such as Romeo and Juliet, but that underlying traditional Chinese values of indivisibility of self from one's environment, including from society, served to create the necessary fictional device of romantic tension.[236] In addition, Tang literature often discussed gender expression. Literary texts such as "Tiandi yinyang jiaohuan dale fu" and "You xianku" depicted how the Tang nobility emphasized Taoist sexology.[237] Many male Tang poets and literati conveyed their love for male companions when they perceived their wives—often illiterate—to be incapable of understanding their troubles.[238]

Calligraphy by Emperor Taizong on a Tang stele

Large encyclopaedias were published during the Tang: the Yiwen Leiju was compiled in 624 under chief editor Ouyang Xun (557–641), Linghu Defen (582–666) and Chen Shuda (d. 635). By 729, the team led by scholar Gautama Siddha (fl. 8th century), an ethnic Indian born in Chang'an, had finished compiling the Treatise on Astrology of the Kaiyuan Era, an astrological encyclopaedia.

Chinese geographers, such as Jia Dan, wrote accurate descriptions of places far beyond Tang territory. In his work written between 785 and 805, Jia described the sea route going into the mouth of the Persian Gulf, and that the medieval Iranians had erected 'ornamental pillars' in the sea that acted as lighthouse beacons for ships that might go astray.[239] Arabic authors writing a century after Jia, such as al-Masudi and al-Maqdisi, also mentioned these structures in their accounts, confirming Jia's reports. The Tang diplomat Wang Xuance travelled to Magadha, in present-day northeast India, during the 7th century.[240] Afterwards, he wrote the Zhang Tianzhu Guotu (Illustrated Accounts of Central India), a book which contained a large body of geographical information.[241]

Many histories of previous dynasties were compiled between 636 and 659 by court officials during and shortly after the reign of Emperor Taizong of Tang. These included the Book of Liang, Book of Chen, Book of Northern Qi, Book of Zhou, Book of Sui, Book of Jin, History of Northern Dynasties and the History of Southern Dynasties. Although not included in the official Twenty-Four Histories, the Tongdian and Tang Huiyao were nonetheless valuable written historical works of the Tang period. The Shitong written by Liu Zhiji in 710, was a meta-history that surveyed the tradition of Chinese historiography to date. The Great Tang Records on the Western Regions, compiled by Bianji, recounted the journey of Xuanzang, the Tang era's most renowned Buddhist monk.

Other important literature included Duan Chengshi's (d. 863) Miscellaneous Morsels from Youyang, an entertaining collection of foreign legends and hearsay, reports on natural phenomena, short anecdotes, mythical and mundane tales, as well as notes on various subjects. The exact literary category or classification that Duan's large informal narrative would fit into is still debated among scholars and historians.[242]

Religion and philosophy

[edit]
A Tang dynasty sculpture of a Bodhisattva
An 8th-century silk wall scroll from Dunhuang, showing the paradise of Amitabha

Since ancient times, some Chinese had believed in folk religion and Taoism that incorporated many deities. Practitioners believed the Tao and the afterlife was a reality parallel to the living world, complete with its own bureaucracy and afterlife currency needed by dead ancestors. Funerary practices included providing the deceased with everything they might need in the afterlife, including animals, servants, entertainers, hunters, homes, and officials. This ideal is reflected in Tang art.[243] This is also reflected in many short stories written in the Tang about people accidentally winding up in the realm of the dead, only to come back and report their experiences.[244] Taoist ideologies surrounding the medical and health benefits of heterosexuality pervaded. Although such ideologies did not necessarily prevent homosexual or bisexual practices, they advocated for a blueprint of health and wellness that conformed to heterosexuality.[245]

Buddhism, originating in India around the time of Confucius, continued its influence during the Tang period and was accepted by some members of imperial family, becoming thoroughly sinicised and a permanent part of Chinese traditional culture. In an age before Neo-Confucianism and figures such as Zhu Xi (1130–1200), Buddhism had begun to flourish in China during the Northern and Southern dynasties, and became the dominant ideology during the prosperous Tang. Buddhist monasteries played an integral role in Chinese society, offering lodging for travellers in remote areas, schools for children throughout the country, and a place for urban literati to stage social events and gatherings such as going-away parties. Buddhist monasteries were also engaged in the economy, since their land property and serfs gave them enough revenues to set up mills, oil presses, and other enterprises.[246][247] Although the monasteries retained 'serfs', these monastery dependents could actually own property and employ others to help them in their work, including their own slaves.[248]

The prominent status of Buddhism in Chinese culture began to decline as the dynasty and central government declined as well during the late 8th century to 9th century. Buddhist convents and temples that were exempt from state taxes beforehand were targeted by the state for taxation. In 845, Emperor Wuzong finally shut down 4,600 Buddhist monasteries along with 40,000 temples and shrines, forcing 260,000 Buddhist monks and nuns to return to secular] life;[249][250] this episode would later be dubbed one of the Four Buddhist Persecutions in China. Although the ban was lifted just a few years after, Buddhism never regained its once dominant status in Chinese culture.[249][250][251][252] This situation also came about through a revival of interest in native Chinese philosophies such as Confucianism and Taoism. Han Yu (786–824)—who Arthur F. Wright stated was a "brilliant polemicist and ardent xenophobe"—was one of the first men of the Tang to denounce Buddhism.[253] Although his contemporaries found him crude and obnoxious, he foreshadowed the later persecution of Buddhism in the Tang, as well as the revival of Confucian theory with the rise of Neo-Confucianism of the Song dynasty.[253] Nonetheless, Chán Buddhism gained popularity among the educated elite.[249] There were also many famous Chan monks from the Tang era, such as Mazu Daoyi, Baizhang, and Huangbo Xiyun. The sect of Pure Land Buddhism initiated by the Chinese monk Huiyuan (334–416) was also just as popular as Chan Buddhism during the Tang.[254]

A timber hall built in 857,[255] located at the Buddhist Foguang Temple of Mount Wutai, Shanxi

Rivaling Buddhism was Taoism, a native Chinese philosophical and religious belief system that found its roots in the Tao Te Ching and the Zhuangzi. The ruling Li family of the Tang dynasty actually claimed descent from Laozi, traditionally credited as the author of the Tao Te Ching.[256] On numerous occasions where Tang princes would become crown prince or Tang princesses taking vows as Taoist priestesses, their lavish former mansions would be converted into Taoist abbeys and places of worship.[256] Many Taoists were associated with alchemy in their pursuits to find an elixir of immortality and a means to create gold from concocted mixtures of many other elements. Although they never achieved their goals in either of these futile pursuits, they did contribute to the discovery of new metal alloys, porcelain products, and new dyes. The historian Joseph Needham labelled the work of the Taoist alchemists as "protoscience rather than pseudoscience".[257] However, the close connection between Taoism and alchemy, which some sinologists have asserted, is refuted by Nathan Sivin, who states that alchemy was just as prominent (if not more so) in the secular sphere and practised more often by laymen.[258]

Details of the rubbing of the Nestorian pillar of Luoyang
The Church of the East's greatest geographical extent during the Middle Ages

The Tang dynasty also officially recognised various foreign religions. The Assyrian Church of the East, otherwise known as the Nestorian Church or the Church of the East in China, was given recognition by the Tang court. In 781, the Nestorian Stele was created in order to honour the achievements of their community in China. A Christian monastery was established in Shaanxi province where the Daqin Pagoda still stands, and inside the pagoda there is Christian-themed artwork. Although the religion largely died out after the Tang, it was revived in China following the Mongol invasions of the 13th century.[259]

Although the Sogdians had been responsible for transmitting Buddhism to China from India during the 2nd–4th centuries, soon afterwards they largely converted to Zoroastrianism due to their links to Sasanian Persia. Sogdian merchants and their families living in cities such as Chang'an, Luoyang, and Xiangyang usually built a Zoroastrian temple once their local communities grew larger than 100 households.[260] Sogdians were also responsible for spreading Manicheism in China and the Uyghur Khaganate. The Uyghurs built the first Manichean monastery in China in 768; in 843, the Tang government ordered that the property of all Manichean monasteries be confiscated in response to the outbreak of war with the Uyghurs. With the blanket ban on foreign religions two years later, Manicheism was driven underground and never flourished in China again.[261]

Leisure

[edit]
A Man Herding Horses, by Han Gan (706–783), a court artist under Xuanzong
Spring Outing of the Tang Court, by Zhang Xuan (713–755)

More than earlier periods, the Tang era was renowned for the time reserved for leisure activities, especially among the upper classes. Many outdoor sports and activities were enjoyed during the Tang, including archery,[262] hunting,[263] horse polo,[264] cuju (soccer), cockfighting,[265] and even tug of war.[266] Government officials were granted vacations during their tenure in office. Officials were granted 30 days off every three years to visit their parents if they lived 1,000 mi (1,600 km) away, or 15 days off if the parents lived more than 167 mi (269 km) away (travel time not included). Officials were granted nine days of vacation time for weddings of a son or daughter, and either five, three, or one days/day off for the nuptials of close relatives (travel time not included). Officials also received a total of three days off for their son's capping initiation rite into manhood, and one day off for the ceremony of initiation rite of a close relative's son.[267] Among the royalty, the tradition of male homosexuality of Imperial China continued to exist, where eunuchs were often the royalty’s male favorites, both due to their appearance and talents.[268]

A Tang sancai-glazed carved relief showing horseback riders playing polo

Traditional Chinese holidays such as Chinese New Year, Lantern Festival, Cold Food Festival, and others were universal holidays. In Chang'an, there was always lively celebration, especially for the Lantern Festival since the city's nighttime curfew was lifted by the government for three days straight. Between 628 and 758, the imperial throne bestowed a total of sixty-nine grand carnivals nationwide, granted by the emperor in the case of special circumstances such as important military victories, abundant harvests after a long drought or famine, the granting of amnesties, or the instalment of a new crown prince.[269] For special celebration in the Tang era, lavish and gargantuan-sized feasts were sometimes prepared, as the imperial court had staffed agencies to prepare the meals. This included a prepared feast for 1,100 elders of Chang'an in 664, a feast held for 3,500 officers of the Divine Strategy Army in 768, and one in 826 for 1,200 members of the imperial family and women of the palace.[270] Alcohol consumption was a prominent facet of Chinese culture; people during the Tang drank for nearly every social event. An 8th-century court official allegedly had a serpent-shaped structure called the 'ale grotto' built on the ground floor using a total of 50,000 bricks, which featured bowls from which each of his friends could drink.[271]

Status in clothing

[edit]
A late Tang or early Five Dynasties era silk painting on a banner depicting Guanyin and a female attendant in silk robes, from the Dunhuang caves – British Museum

In general, garments were made from silk, wool, or linen depending on your social status and what you could afford. Furthermore, there were laws that specified what kinds of clothing could be worn by whom. The color of the clothing also indicated rank. During this period, China's power, culture, economy, and influence were thriving. As a result, women could afford to wear loose-fitting, wide-sleeved garments. Even lower-class women's robes had sleeves four to five feet wide.[272][better source needed]

Position of women

[edit]
Beauties Wearing Flowers by Zhou Fang, 8th century
Woman playing polo, 8th century
Palace ladies in a garden from a mural of Prince Li Xian's tomb in the Qianling Mausoleum, where Wu Zetian was later buried in 706

Concepts of women's social rights and social status during the Tang era were notably liberal-minded for the period. However, this was largely reserved for urban women of elite status, as men and women in the rural countryside laboured hard in their different set of tasks; with wives and daughters responsible for more domestic tasks of weaving textiles and rearing of silk worms, while men tended to farming in the fields.[114] There were many women in the Tang era who gained access to religious authority by taking vows as Taoist priestesses.[256]

In Chang'an, ordinary courtesans inhabited the North Hamlet.[273] They were generally knowledgeable in the rules of drinking games, and received particular training in table manners.[274] While renowned for their politeness, courtesans were reputed to dominate conversations among elite men, and as being unafraid to openly criticise the rudeness of prominent male guests, including for talking too much, too loudly, or for boasting of their accomplishments.[275] Courtesans were sometimes beaten by their procuring madames.[276]

Gējìs, or professional singing courtesans, were culturally prominent, and joined talent agencies called jiaofang. The emperor selected particularly talented women from the outer jiaofang to form the spring court, who were supplemented by courtesans from other troupes.[277] During the Tang, singing courtesans who were also talented in the poetry.[278] In addition to singing, some courtesans composed their own songs, and even popularised a new form of lyrical verse that incorporated quotations of famous historical figures.[225]

It was fashionable for women to have full figures; men enjoyed the presence of assertive, active women. The foreign horse-riding sport of polo from Persia became a wildly popular trend among the Chinese elite, and women often played the sport (as glazed earthenware figurines from the time period portray).[279] The preferred hairstyle for women was to bunch their hair up like "an elaborate edifice above the forehead",[280] while affluent ladies wore extravagant head ornaments, combs, pearl necklaces, face powders, and perfumes.[281] A 671 law attempted to force women to wear hats with veils again in order to promote decency, but these laws were ignored as some women started wearing caps and even no hats at all, as well as men's riding clothes and boots, and tight-sleeved bodices.[282]

There were some prominent court women after the era of Empress Wu, such as Yang Guifei (719–756), who had Emperor Xuanzong appoint many of her relatives and cronies to important ministerial and martial positions.[49]

Cuisine

[edit]
A page of The Classic of Tea by Tang era author Lu Yu

During the earlier Northern and Southern dynasties (420–589), and perhaps even earlier, the drinking of tea (Camellia sinensis) became popular in southern China. Tea was viewed then as a beverage of tasteful pleasure and with pharmacological purpose as well.[225] During the Tang dynasty, tea became synonymous with everything sophisticated in society. The poet Lu Tong (790–835) devoted most of his poetry to his love of tea. The 8th-century author Lu Yu, known as the Sage of Tea, wrote a treatise on the art of drinking tea called The Classic of Tea.[283] Although wrapping paper had been used in China since the 2nd century BC, during the Tang it was used as folded and sewn square bags to hold and preserve the flavor of tea leaves. This followed many other uses for paper such as the first recorded use of toilet paper in 589 by the scholar-official Yan Zhitui (531–591), confirmed in 851 by an Arab traveller who remarked that the Tang lacked cleanliness because they relied on toilet paper instead of washing themselves with water.[284]

In ancient times, the Chinese had outlined the five most basic foodstuffs known as the five grains: sesamum, legumes, wheat, panicled millet, and glutinous millet. The Ming dynasty encyclopedist Song Yingxing noted that rice was not counted among the five grains from the time of the legendary and deified Chinese sage Shennong (the existence of whom Yingxing wrote was "an uncertain matter") into the 2nd millennium BC, because the properly wet and humid climate in southern China for growing rice was not yet fully settled or cultivated by the Chinese.[285] Song Yingxing also noted that in the Ming dynasty, seven tenths of civilians' food was rice. During the Tang dynasty rice was not only the most important staple in southern China, but had also become popular in the north where central authority resided.[286]

During the Tang dynasty, wheat replaced the position of millet and became the main staple crop. As a consequence, wheat cake shared a considerable amount in the staple of Tang.[287] There were four main kinds of cake: steamed cake, boiled cake, pancake, and Hu cake. Steamed cake was consumed commonly by both civilians and aristocrats. Like rougamo in modern Chinese cuisine, steamed cake was usually stuffed with meat and vegetables. Boiled cake was the staple of the Northern Dynasties, and it kept its popularity in the Tang dynasty. It included a wide variety of dishes similar to modern wonton, noodles, and many other kinds of food that soak wheat in water. While aristocrats favoured wonton, civilians usually consumed noodles and noodle slice soup that were easier to produce.[288] Pancakes was rare in China before the Tang, when it gained popularity.[289] Hu cake was extremely popular during the Tang.[290] Hu cake was toasted in the oven, covered with sesame seeds, and served at taverns, inns and shops. Japanese Buddhist monk Ennin observed that Hu cake was popular among all of China's civilians.[291]

During the Tang, the many common foodstuffs and cooking ingredients in addition to those already listed were barley, garlic, salt, turnips, soybeans, pears, apricots, peaches, apples, pomegranates, jujubes, rhubarb, hazelnuts, pine nuts, chestnuts, walnuts, yams, taro, etc. The various meats that were consumed included pork, chicken, lamb (especially preferred in the north), sea otter, bear (which was hard to catch, but there were recipes for steamed, boiled, and marinated bear), and even Bactrian camels.[292] In the south along the coast meat from seafood was by default the most common, as the Chinese enjoyed eating cooked jellyfish with cinnamon, Sichuan pepper, cardamom, and ginger, as well as oysters with wine, fried squid with ginger and vinegar, horseshoe crabs and red swimming crabs, shrimp and pufferfish, which the Chinese called "river piglet".[293]

From the trade overseas and over land, the Chinese acquired peaches from Samarkand, date palms, pistachios, and figs from Persia, pine nuts and ginseng roots from Korea and mangoes from Southeast Asia.[294][295] In China, there was a great demand for sugar; during the reign of Harsha over northern India (r. 606–647), Indian envoys to the Tang brought two makers of sugar who successfully taught the Chinese how to cultivate sugarcane.[296][297] Cotton also came from India as a finished product from Bengal, although it was during the Tang that the Chinese began to grow and process cotton, and by the Yuan dynasty it became the prime textile fabric in China.[298]

Some foods were off-limits, as the Tang court encouraged people not to eat beef. This was due to the role of the bull as a valuable working animal. From 831 to 833, Emperor Wenzong even banned the slaughter of cattle on the grounds of his religious convictions to Buddhism.[299]

Methods of food preservation were important, and practised throughout China. The common people used simple methods of preservation, such as digging deep ditches and trenches, brining, and salting their foods.[300] The emperor had large ice pits located in the parks in and around Chang'an for preserving food, while the wealthy and elite had their own smaller ice pits. Each year the emperor had labourers carve 1000 blocks of ice from frozen creeks in mountain valleys, each block with dimensions 0.9 m × 0.9 m × 1.1 m (2 ft 11 in × 2 ft 11 in × 3 ft 7 in) . Frozen delicacies such as chilled melon were enjoyed during the summer.[301]

Science and technology

[edit]

Engineering

[edit]
A square bronze mirror with a phoenix motif of gold and silver inlaid with lacquer, 8th century

Technology during the Tang period was built also upon the precedents of the past. Previous advancements in clockworks and timekeeping included the mechanical gear systems of Zhang Heng (78–139) and Ma Jun (fl. 3rd century), which gave the Tang mathematician, mechanical engineer, astronomer, and monk Yi Xing (683–727) inspiration when he invented the world's first clockwork escapement mechanism in 725.[302] This was used alongside a water clock and waterwheel to power a rotating armillary sphere in representation of astronomical observation. Yi Xing's device also had a mechanically timed bell that was struck automatically every hour, and a drum that was struck automatically every quarter-hour; essentially, a striking clock. Yi Xing's astronomical clock and water-powered armillary sphere became well known throughout the country, since students attempting to pass the imperial examinations by 730 had to write an essay on the device as an exam requirement.[303] However, the most common type of public and palace timekeeping device was the inflow clepsydra. Its design was improved c. 610 by the Sui dynasty engineers Geng Xun and Yuwen Kai. They provided a steelyard balance that allowed seasonal adjustment in the pressure head of the compensating tank and could then control the rate of flow for different lengths of day and night.[304]

There were many other mechanical inventions during the Tang era. These included a 0.9 m (2 ft 11 in) tall mechanical wine server created during the early 8th century in the shape of an artificial mountain, carved out of iron and rested on a lacquered-wooden tortoise frame. This intricate device used a hydraulic pump that siphoned wine out of metal dragon-headed faucets, as well as tilting bowls that were timed to dip wine down, by force of gravity when filled, into an artificial lake that had intricate iron leaves popping up as trays for placing party treats.[305] Furthermore, as the historian Charles Benn describes it:

Midway up the southern side of the mountain was a dragon ... the beast opened its mouth and spit brew into a goblet seated on a large [iron] lotus leaf beneath. When the cup was 80% full, the dragon ceased spewing ale, and a guest immediately seized the goblet. If he was slow in draining the cup and returning it to the leaf, the door of a pavilion at the top of the mountain opened and a mechanical wine server, dressed in a cap and gown, emerged with a wooden bat in his hand. As soon as the guest returned the goblet, the dragon refilled it, the wine server withdrew, and the doors of the pavilion closed ... A pump siphoned the ale that flowed into the ale pool through a hidden hole and returned the brew to the reservoir [holding more than 16 quarts/15 litres of wine] inside the mountain.[305]

Yet the use of a teasing mechanical puppet in this wine-serving device was not exactly a novel invention of the Tang, since the use of mechanical puppets in China date to the Qin dynasty (221–206 BC). In the 3rd century Ma Jun had an entire mechanical puppet theatre operated by the rotation of a waterwheel.[306] There are many stories of automatons used in the Tang, including general Yang Wulian's wooden statue of a monk who stretched his hands out to collect contributions; when the number of coins reached a certain weight, the mechanical figure moved his arms to deposit them in a satchel.[307] This weight-and-lever mechanism was exactly like Heron's penny slot machine.[308] Other devices included one by Wang Ju, whose "wooden otter" could allegedly catch fish; Needham suspects a spring trap of some kind was employed here.[307]

In the realm of structural engineering and technical Chinese architecture, there were also government standard building codes, outlined in the early Tang building code Yingshan Ling. Fragments of this book have survived in the Tang Lü (Tang Code), while the Song dynasty architectural manual of the Yingzao Fashi by Li Jie (1065–1101) in 1103 is the oldest existing technical treatise on Chinese architecture that has survived in full. During the reign of Emperor Xuanzong (712–756), there were 34,850 registered craftsmen serving the state, managed by an agency for palace buildings.[309]

Woodblock printing

[edit]
The Diamond Sutra (868) is the world's first widely printed book to include a specific date of printing

Woodblock printing made the written word available to vastly greater audiences. One of the world's oldest surviving printed documents is a miniature Buddhist dharani sutra unearthed at Xi'an in 1974, and dated roughly from 650 to 670.[310] The Diamond Sutra is the first full-length book printed at regular size, complete with illustrations embedded with the text and precisely dated to 868.[311][312] Among the earliest documents to be printed were Buddhist texts as well as calendars, the latter essential for calculating and marking which days were auspicious and which days were not.[313] With so many books coming into circulation for the general public, literacy rates could improve, along with the lower classes being able to obtain cheaper sources of study. Therefore, there were more lower-class people seen entering the Imperial Examinations and passing them by the later Song dynasty.[314][315][316] Although the later Bi Sheng's movable type printing in the 11th century was innovative for his period, woodblock printing that became widespread in the Tang remained the dominant method of printing in China until the more advanced printing press from Europe became widely accepted and used in East Asia.[317] The first use of the playing card during the Tang dynasty was an auxiliary invention of the new age of printing.[318]

Cartography

[edit]
The Dunhuang map, a star map dated c. 700 depicting the north polar region;[319] the map belongs to a set cataloguing a total of over 1,300 stars[320]

In cartography, the Tang made further advances beyond the standards of the Han. When the Tang chancellor Pei Ju (547–627) was working for the Sui dynasty as a Commercial Commissioner in 605, he created a well-known gridded map with a graduated scale in the tradition of Pei Xiu (224–271).[321] The Tang chancellor Xu Jingzong (592–672) was also known for his map of China drawn in 658. In 785, the Emperor Dezong had the geographer and cartographer Jia Dan (730–805) complete a map of China and her former colonies in Central Asia. Upon its completion in 801, the map was 9.1 m (30 ft) in length and 10 m (33 ft) in height, mapped out on a grid scale of one inch equalling one hundred li.[322] A Chinese map of 1137 is similar in complexity to the one made by Jia Dan, carved on a stone stele with a grid scale of 100 li.[323] The only Tang-era maps that have survived are star charts, despite the earliest extant terrain maps of China from the earlier state of Qin.[324]

Medicine

[edit]

The Chinese of the Tang era were interested in the benefits of officially classifying the medicines used in pharmacology. In 657, Emperor Gaozong of Tang (r. 649–683) commissioned an official materia medica, complete with text and illustrated drawings for 833 different medicinal substances.[325] In addition to compiling pharmacopeias, the Tang fostered learning in medicine by upholding imperial medical colleges, state examinations for doctors, and publishing forensic manuals for physicians.[298] Authors of medicine in the Tang include Zhen Chuan (d. 643) and Sun Simiao (581–682); the former was the first to identify in writing that patients with diabetes had an excess of sugar in their urine, and the latter was the first to recognise that diabetic patients should avoid consuming alcohol and starchy foods. As written by Zhen Chuan and others in the Tang, the thyroid glands of sheep and pigs were successfully used to treat goitres; thyroid extracts were not used to treat patients with goitre in the West until 1890.[326] The use of the dental amalgam, manufactured from tin and silver, was first introduced in the medical text Xinxiu bencao written by Su Gong in 659.[327]

Alchemy, gas cylinders, and air conditioning

[edit]

Chinese scientists of the Tang period employed complex chemical formulas for an array of different purposes, often found through experiments of alchemy. These included a waterproof and dust-repelling cream or varnish for clothes and weapons, fireproof cement for glass and porcelain wares, a waterproof cream applied to silk clothes of underwater divers, a cream designated for polishing bronze mirrors, and many other useful formulas.[328] Porcelain was invented in China during the Tang, although many types of glazed ceramics preceded it.[212][329]

Since the time of the Han, the Chinese had drilled deep boreholes to transport natural gas from bamboo pipelines to stoves where cast iron evaporation pans boiled brine to extract salt.[330] During the Tang dynasty, a gazetteer of Sichuan province stated that at one of these 182 m (597 ft) 'fire wells', men collected natural gas into portable bamboo tubes which could be carried around for dozens of kilometres and still produce a flame.[331] These were essentially the first gas cylinders; Robert Temple assumes some sort of tap was used for this device.[331]

The inventor Ding Huan (fl. 180) of the Han dynasty invented a rotary fan for air conditioning.[332] In 747, Emperor Xuanzong had a "Cool Hall" built in the imperial palace, which Tang Yulin described as having water-powered fan wheels for air conditioning as well as rising jet streams of water from fountains.[333] During the subsequent Song dynasty, written sources mentioned the rotary fan as even more widely used.[334]

Historiography

[edit]

The first classic work about the Tang is the Old Book of Tang by Liu Xu et al. of the Later Jin. This was edited into another history (labeled the New Book of Tang) by the Song historians Ouyang Xiu, Song Qi, et al. Both were based on earlier annals, now lost.[335] Both of them also rank among the Twenty-Four Histories of China. One of the surviving sources of the Old Book of Tang, primarily covering up to 756, is the Tongdian, which Du You presented to the emperor in 801. The Tang period was placed into the enormous 294-volume universal history text of the Zizhi Tongjian, edited, compiled, and completed in 1084 by a team of scholars under the Song dynasty Chancellor Sima Guang. This historical text covered the history of China from the beginning of the Warring States in 403 BC until the beginning of the Song dynasty in 960.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Tang dynasty (唐朝) (618–907 CE) was an imperial dynasty that governed following the Sui dynasty's collapse and preceding the era of fragmentation known as the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms (五代十國). It was established by Li Yuan, a who proclaimed himself Gaozu in 618 after overthrowing the Sui regime amid widespread rebellions. Under rulers like Taizong (唐太宗, Li Shimin 李世民, r. 626–649), the dynasty achieved conquests that expanded 's borders into , , Korea, and , fostering a cosmopolitan empire through diplomacy and tribute systems. The Tang era exemplified economic prosperity driven by agricultural innovations, canal networks inherited from the Sui, and thriving international commerce, which supported urban centers like as hubs of multicultural exchange. Culturally, it represented a pinnacle of artistic and intellectual achievement, with advancements in , , and Buddhism's integration into state ideology, alongside bureaucratic reforms emphasizing merit-based examinations. However, internal strife, including the (755–763), precipitated a gradual decline, leading to influence, fiscal strain, and eventual dynastic overthrow by in 907. Despite its fall, the Tang's legacy endures as a model of imperial grandeur and innovation in East Asian history.

History

Establishment and Early Reforms (618–626)

The Tang dynasty was founded on June 18, 618, when Li Yuan, a Sui dynasty military governor and Duke of Taiyuan, declared himself Emperor Gaozu after capturing the capital Chang'an in late 617 amid the Sui regime's collapse. Having initially acted as regent for a puppet Sui emperor, Gaozu proclaimed the new dynasty upon confirmation of Sui Emperor Yang's assassination by rebel general Yuwen Huaji. This establishment capitalized on widespread rebellions against Sui overextension, including excessive taxation and failed military campaigns, positioning the Tang as a successor state inheriting Sui's centralized framework while addressing its failures. Early unification efforts focused on subduing rival warlords fragmenting northern , with Gaozu's second son, Li Shimin, leading key campaigns. In 618, Tang forces defeated Xue Ju's Western Qin regime in the northwest; by 620, Liu Wuzhou's forces in the north were vanquished; and in 621, decisive victories over Dou Jiande in the east and Wang Shichong around secured the Central Plains. These operations, supported by alliances and the mobilization of former Sui troops, consolidated Tang control over core territories by approximately 623, though southern regions submitted more gradually through diplomacy and residual Sui loyalties. By this point, the dynasty had reestablished imperial authority over a estimated at around 50 million, restoring stability after years of . Administrative reforms under Gaozu emphasized continuity with Sui precedents while mitigating their excesses, including the adoption of a pyramidal with three principal ministries, nine executive courts, and six supervisory boards overseeing civil, , and censorial functions. The empire was divided into about 300 prefectures and 1,500 counties for local governance, facilitating tax collection and . To staff this meritocratically, Gaozu instituted civil service examinations drawing on Confucian classics, marking an early step toward institutionalized recruitment over pure aristocratic privilege. Economically, he emulated Sui equal-field land distribution to allocate arable plots to peasant households based on labor capacity, aiming to boost agricultural output and secure tax revenues without alienating landowners. Further reforms targeted Sui-era grievances: Gaozu reduced punitive tax rates burdened by corvée labor and grain levies, easing fiscal pressures on a war-torn populace. He also overhauled the draconian legal codes of Sui Yang, moderating penalties and emphasizing to rebuild public trust and legitimacy. These policies, implemented through imperial edicts and household registrations, acknowledged de facto peasant land rights while centralizing state oversight, laying foundations for Tang prosperity without radical overhaul. Gaozu's reign ended in 626 with his forced abdication following the , where Li Shimin eliminated princely rivals to assume the throne as Taizong.

Expansion and Internal Challenges (627–689)

Following the of 626, Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649) prioritized stabilizing and expanding Tang control over northern nomadic threats, defeating the Eastern Turks in 629 under generals Li Jing and Li Shimin's earlier allies, capturing their leader Jieli Khan and incorporating Türkic territories as protectorates. This victory extended Tang influence across the Mongolian steppe, with subjugated tribes like the providing tribute and military auxiliaries. Taizong then turned westward, conquering the oasis kingdom of in 640 through General Hou Junji's campaign, establishing the Anxi Protectorate to administer the region and secure routes. Further expeditions subdued Karakhoja in 644 and in 648, while in 646, General Su Dingfang crushed remnants, creating additional prefectures for defense. Taizong's ambitions extended to Korea and ; a 645 invasion of failed due to harsh weather and fortified defenses, costing over 2,000 Tang lives and prompting a strategic retreat. , under King , acknowledged Tang overlordship through a 641 alliance with , though border skirmishes persisted. Under Taizong's son, Emperor Gaozong (r. 649–683), expansions continued aggressively: in 657, Su Dingfang decisively defeated the at the River, dismantling their confederation and establishing garrisons across the Ili Valley and beyond, reaching toward the Oxus River. Joint operations with allies conquered Baekje in 660, capturing King Uija and annexing its territories, followed by 's fall in 668 after a prolonged of , though Tang forces soon withdrew amid Silla's consolidation and Japanese interventions. Internal challenges emerged amid these conquests, as Gaozong suffered debilitating strokes from around 665, diminishing his capacity and elevating Empress Wu's role in governance. Wu, initially a consort under Taizong, maneuvered ruthlessly to eliminate rivals, including the deposition and execution of Empress Wang and Consort Xiao in 655 on fabricated charges, consolidating her influence over court factions. She established an informant network to monitor officials, fostering paranoia and purges that undermined bureaucratic loyalty, while succession disputes intensified— died suspiciously in 675, possibly poisoned, amid Wu's opposition to his reformist leanings. By 683, upon Gaozong's death, Wu sidelined heirs Li Xian (Zhongzong, 中宗) and Li Dan (Ruizong, 睿宗) as figureheads, installing loyalists and executing opponents like the chancellor temporarily, setting the stage for her 690 usurpation. These court intrigues, coupled with the fiscal strains of distant campaigns—requiring mobilizations and labor—exposed vulnerabilities in centralized control, as regional commanders gained autonomy in frontier defenses. Tibetan incursions into the southwest by the 670s further tested overextended resources, forcing diplomatic concessions despite earlier gains.

Wu Zetian's Usurpation and Rule (690–705)

In October 690, Wu Zetian (武則天), who had ruled as empress dowager since Emperor Gaozong's death in 683, compelled her son Emperor Ruizong to abdicate and declared the restoration of the Zhou dynasty, ending the Tang interregnum and assuming the title of emperor herself as Huangdi Zetian Dasheng (Emperor Zetian the Great Sage). She shifted the capital to Luoyang and initiated a series of ideological changes, including the promotion of Buddhism to legitimize her rule, which traditional Confucian historians later criticized as a deviation from orthodoxy, though these accounts reflect biases against female sovereignty. During her 15-year reign (690–705), consolidated imperial authority through meritocratic reforms, expanding the examination system to prioritize talent over aristocratic lineage by incorporating practical administrative rules into testing criteria around 693. She established a network of informants and to monitor officials and suppress dissent, enabling the purge of Tang loyalists and the recruitment of capable administrators, which stabilized the despite accusations of terror from contemporary records biased by Confucian elites. Economically, she implemented agrarian policies including irrigation projects and a tax remission in 695, fostering prosperity and agricultural output that supported and territorial security. Militarily, her administration expanded frontiers and reinforced borders, contributing to the Tang's later without major internal collapse during her direct rule. Wu Zetian's favoritism toward manifested in state sponsorship, such as erecting temples, translating scriptures, and a 692 edict banning pig slaughter to align with Buddhist precepts, elevating the religion's status over and Daoism. She also advanced women's roles symbolically by equalizing mourning rites for mothers with those for fathers and commissioning histories highlighting female figures, though these measures coexisted with ruthless eliminations of rivals, including family members, as documented in official annals that modern scholars view as exaggerated for moralistic purposes. By 705, at age 81 and weakened by illness, faced a coup led by officials including Zhang Jianzhi, who restored her son Li Xian (Emperor Zhongzong) to the throne, reinstating the Tang dynasty on February 21 while confining her to the palace until her death on December 16. This transition marked the end of her Zhou interlude, with her policies enduring to bolster Tang recovery, underscoring her effectiveness despite vilification in male-dominated historiography.

Xuanzong's Prosperity and Decadence (712–756)

Emperor Xuanzong (唐玄宗) ascended the throne in 712, initially ruling effectively through capable advisors like Chancellor Yao Chong, who helped stabilize the administration following the turbulent years after Wu Zetian's death. His early reign, particularly the Kaiyuan era from 713 to 741, marked a period of economic expansion and institutional refinement, with reforms including the abolition of the death penalty for certain offenses and enhancements to Silk Road security that boosted trade. A comprehensive population re-registration after 720 significantly expanded the taxpayer base by incorporating previously unregistered individuals, thereby increasing state revenues and restoring central oversight over rural areas. Fiscal policies emphasized frugality in , reduction of Buddhist monastic landholdings to curb their economic influence, and revitalization of state granaries to ensure amid agricultural improvements. These measures, combined with land redistribution efforts and upgrades like better transportation networks, contributed to heightened productivity and , as enhanced incentivized peasant labor investments. Culturally, Xuanzong patronized the arts, elevating as the in 713 and fostering literary flourishing, with poets like receiving imperial support during this prosperous phase. Military reorganization separated administrative and combat roles in frontier armies, initially strengthening defenses while enabling economic focus inland. By the mid-740s, however, Xuanzong's attention shifted toward personal indulgences, notably his relationship with consort (719–756), whose family, including her cousin , gained undue influence over court appointments despite lacking merit. This favoritism eroded administrative competence, as capable officials were sidelined in favor of the Yang clan, fostering corruption and neglecting frontier military oversight. , a general of Sogdian and Turkic descent commanding northern border forces, exploited this vacuum; appointed as a palace tiger-tamer in 751 and granted the title of Prince in 754, his rapid promotions reflected Xuanzong's misjudged trust amid growing regional unrest from natural disasters and defeats, such as the 751 loss to Abbasids at Talas. The emperor's detachment from governance, symbolized by excessive reliance on eunuchs and entertainments, weakened central authority, setting conditions for An Lushan's rebellion in 755, which devastated the empire and ended the dynasty's peak.

An Lushan Rebellion (安史之亂) and Devastation (755–763)

The erupted in November 755 when General , commanding the Pinglu Army in the northeast, mutinied against Emperor Xuanzong, citing corruption and favoritism toward Chancellor as pretexts for his ambition to seize power. An, of Sogdian and Turkic descent, had risen through military service but harbored resentment amid Tang court intrigues and regional autonomy granted to frontier commanders. By December 755, his forces of approximately 200,000 captured the eastern capital , prompting Xuanzong's flight from to in June 756, during which imperial consort was executed by mutinous troops to appease demands against Yang influence. An proclaimed himself Emperor of Yan, exploiting ethnic tensions and the Tang's overreliance on non-Han generals for border defense. The rebellion's early successes stemmed from Tang military disarray, with loyalist forces fragmented and Xuanzong's son Li Heng assuming the throne as Emperor Suzong in 756 to rally resistance. An's advance stalled due to logistical strains, and internal strife led to his assassination by his son in January 757, who briefly continued the revolt but lost to Tang counterattacks led by . , An's former ally, seized control in 757, recapturing and by 758, but his death at the hands of his own son Shi Chaoyi in 761 fragmented the rebels further. Tang forces, bolstered by Uighur allies, gradually reclaimed territory, culminating in the fall of rebel holdouts in by February 763. The conflict inflicted catastrophic devastation, with direct military engagements, sieges, famines, and epidemics reducing China's registered population from around 53 million in 755 to about 17 million by 764, though historians debate the extent attributable solely to war versus underreporting, migration, and . Estimates of deaths range from 13 million to 36 million, representing up to a third of the global population at the time, underscoring the rebellion's role in shattering Tang agricultural heartlands and urban centers like and , which suffered massacres and destruction. Politically, the eroded central authority, as reliance on semi-autonomous and foreign mercenaries like the Uighurs empowered regional factions and eunuchs, marking the transition from Tang prosperity to prolonged instability. Economic fallout included disrupted trade and tax revenues, with northern depopulated and exacerbating social collapse, though southern regions remained relatively intact, allowing partial recovery. The event exposed vulnerabilities in the Tang's frontier defense system, where ethnic commanders' loyalty proved contingent on personal gain rather than imperial fealty.

Recovery Efforts and Factional Strife (763–820)

Following the suppression of the in 763, Emperor Daizong (r. 762–779) prioritized military stabilization and administrative continuity amid widespread devastation, including a from approximately 53 million in 755 to 17 million by 764 due to warfare, famine, and disease. Generals such as and Pugu Huaien repelled Tibetan (Tubo) incursions and Tangut threats in 763, securing northern frontiers temporarily, while Uyghur allies extracted tribute in exchange for aid against rebels. Eunuchs like Cheng Yuanzhen and Yu Chao'en assumed control over the newly formed Shence Army (shencejun), marking the onset of their interference in imperial decisions and foreshadowing factional tensions between court bureaucrats and palace insiders. Economic measures inherited from prior reigns, including Liu Yan's grain transport reforms and salt monopoly, sustained fiscal recovery, though (military governors) entrenched regional autonomy by retaining command of frontier armies originally raised to combat the rebellion. Emperor Dezong (r. 779–805) pursued centralizing reforms to reclaim authority from , implementing the two-tax system (liangshuifa) in 779 under minister Yang Yan, which assessed taxes biannually based on land acreage and agricultural output rather than household labor, alleviating burdens and adapting to post-rebellion demographic shifts. This fiscal innovation boosted revenue but provoked resistance; Dezong's campaigns against defiant governors, such as the 781 Jingyuan relocation fiasco, forced him to flee and concede hereditary appointments, exacerbating fragmentation as governors like Li Bao-min leveraged private armies. dominance intensified under figures like Dou , fueling court rivalries between reformist officials and entrenched palace networks, while increased taxation to fund anti- wars sowed peasant discontent without resolving underlying militarism. Brief under Shunzong in 805 saw the aborted Yongzhen Renovation, a faction-led attempt against eunuchs by Wang Shuwen and allies, which collapsed amid counterplots and military governor interventions. Emperor Xianzong (r. 805–820) achieved partial resurgence through resolute suppression of rebellious , reclaiming territories via campaigns from 815 to 818 led by loyalists like Li Guangyan, supported by ministers Pei Du and Li Jifu who enforced tax quotas and curtailed hereditary commands. Reforms under Li Jiang standardized administrative practices, enhancing and oversight via the Salt and Iron Commission, which by 799 generated over half of state revenue, enabling fiscal stabilization. Yet factional strife persisted, with exploiting Xianzong's reliance on them for enforcement; Chen Hongzhi orchestrated the emperor's assassination in 820, installing a successor and perpetuating palace intrigue over bureaucratic ideals. These efforts yielded temporary central authority gains but failed to dismantle entrenchment or overreach, as regional powers and court divisions eroded long-term cohesion.

Eunuch Domination and Final Collapse (820–907)

Following the death of Emperor Xianzong (唐憲宗) in 820, who had briefly reasserted imperial authority by suppressing influence and regional , his successors fell under the dominance of , who controlled access to the throne, military commands, and administrative appointments. Eunuchs such as Wang Shoucheng and Yu Zhun wielded effective veto power over policy, installing and deposing emperors at will, which exacerbated factional strife between officials and undermined central . This period saw seven emperors in quick succession—Muzong (r. 820–824), Jingzong (r. 824–827), Wenzong (唐文宗, r. 827–840), Wuzong (唐武宗, r. 840–846), Xuanzong (r. 846–859), Yizong (r. 859–873), and Xizong (r. 873–888)—many of whom were young or indolent, further enabling cliques to monopolize the Shence Army, a guard force numbering around 240,000 by the late that eunuchs repurposed for their own ends. The eunuchs' grip intensified fiscal mismanagement and corruption, as they extracted bribes from officials and diverted revenues, contributing to peasant discontent amid heavy taxation and natural disasters. A pivotal attempt to dismantle eunuch power occurred in the Sweet Dew Incident of December 14, 835, when Emperor Wenzong, resentful of their control, conspired with Chancellor Li Xun to and eliminate key s during a supposed discovery of "sweet dew" (ganlu) on a pavilion, a pretext for summoning them. The plot misfired when loyal eunuch guards detected the , resulting in the slaughter of over 1,000 officials, including Li Xun and several ministers, while the targeted s like Qiu Shiliang consolidated their authority, executing thousands more and purging potential rivals. This failure entrenched eunuch supremacy, as survivors like Wang Shoucheng continued to dictate successions, such as elevating the ineffective Yizong in 859, whose reign saw unchecked extravagance and suppression of under eunuch-backed policies. By the 870s, eunuch domination intersected with the rise of semi-autonomous jiedushi (regional military governors), who withheld taxes and troops from the center, weakening responses to agrarian unrest. The Huang Chao Rebellion, erupting in 875 under salt merchant and failed examination candidate Huang Chao (黃巢) alongside Wang Xianzhi (王仙芝), capitalized on these fissures, drawing support from disaffected peasants burdened by corvée labor and grain levies. Huang's forces, swelling to hundreds of thousands, ravaged the Huai and Yangtze valleys before capturing the secondary capital Luoyang in 880 and the primary capital Chang'an in early 881, forcing Emperor Xizong to flee and sacking the city in reprisal for its wealth disparities. Though Huang proclaimed himself emperor of the Qi dynasty in 881, internal divisions and counterattacks by warlords like Li Keyong led to his defeat and suicide in 884, the rebellion's devastation—destroying administrative records, slaughtering elites, and depopulating regions—irreparably fractured the Tang's fiscal and military base. In the rebellion's aftermath, eunuchs like Tian Lingzi and Yang Fugong briefly retained influence under Xizong and his successor Zhaozong (r. 888–904), but regional commanders such as Zhu Wen, a former Huang Chao lieutenant who defected to the Tang in 882, amassed de facto independence. Zhu, controlling Henan by 900, manipulated the court, deposing Zhaozong in 903 and installing the child Emperor Ai (r. 904–907), before forcing Ai's abdication on January 6, 907, and proclaiming the Later Liang dynasty, marking the Tang's formal end after 289 years. The collapse stemmed causally from eunuch-induced paralysis of imperial decision-making, which prevented coherent suppression of warlordism and rebellions, compounded by overextension from earlier expansions and unequal tax burdens that eroded loyalty in core provinces. This ushered in the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms era of fragmentation until Song unification in 960.

Government and Administration

Imperial Authority and Central Bureaucracy

The of the Tang dynasty wielded supreme authority as the "," deriving legitimacy from the and exercising absolute control over state affairs, military command, and judicial decisions, with no institutional checks beyond personal advisory councils or the occasional remonstrance from censors. This centralized imperial power was reinforced through the abolition of Sui-era aristocratic councils and the establishment of a merit-oriented under Taizong (r. 626–649), who personally reviewed policies and appointments to prevent factionalism. Despite this, early Tang rulers contended with entrenched aristocratic families, who dominated high offices until reforms in the mid-7th century shifted toward examination-based recruitment, though aristocratic influence persisted in limiting full centralization. The central bureaucracy was structured around the Three Departments (sansheng 三省) system, inherited and refined from the , comprising the Department of State Affairs (Shangshu sheng 尚书省) for policy execution, the Secretariat (Zhongshu sheng 中书省) for drafting edicts, and the Chancellery (Menxia sheng 门下省) for reviewing and vetoing proposals to ensure harmony with Confucian principles and imperial intent. Under the Department of State Affairs fell the Six Ministries (liubu 六部): Ministry of Personnel (libu 吏部) for appointments and promotions; Ministry of Revenue (hubu 户部) for taxation and household registration; (libu 礼部) for ceremonies, diplomacy, and education; Ministry of War (bingbu 兵部) for military logistics; Ministry of Justice (xingbu 刑部) for legal administration; and Ministry of Works (gongbu 工部) for infrastructure and engineering projects. This division of labor aimed to distribute responsibilities while maintaining imperial oversight, with chancellors (zaixiang 宰相) coordinating the departments under direct imperial appointment, typically numbering two to six and serving at the emperor's discretion. Complementing this was the Censorate (yushi tai 御史台), an independent body of imperial censors tasked with monitoring officials for corruption or inefficiency, empowered to impeach ministers and audit finances, thereby bolstering the emperor's ability to enforce accountability across the bureaucracy. To extend central control, the emperor dispatched investigating commissioners (anchashi 安察使) to circuits and prefectures, bypassing local governors to verify tax collection and suppress dissent, a mechanism that peaked under Emperor Xuanzong (r. 712–756) but eroded amid later fiscal strains. This framework supported Tang's administrative efficiency, enabling governance over a population estimated at 50 million by 755, though aristocratic clans and eunuch interference increasingly undermined pure imperial dominance by the 8th century.

Civil Service Examinations and Meritocracy

The system, known as keju (科舉), was systematically developed during the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE), evolving from precedents to select bureaucratic officials primarily on intellectual merit rather than hereditary status. Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649 CE) formalized the process in 622 CE by opening examinations to a broader range of male candidates and emphasizing performance in Confucian classics, poetry, and policy essays over aristocratic lineage. Administered by the Board of Rites, exams occurred regularly (changke) and irregularly (zhike), with metropolitan sessions in the capital drawing up to 2,000 candidates annually from qualified provincial examinees. Examinations encompassed several categories, including jinshi (進士), which tested literary composition, , and current affairs; mingjing (明經), focused on rote mastery of Confucian texts; and xiucai (秀才), assessing general erudition and . Candidates underwent anonymous grading to minimize , covering subjects like , , and oral , though success hinged on demonstrating moral uprightness and excluding groups such as merchants, , or those with criminal kin. Pass rates remained stringent, with only about 1–2% succeeding in jinshi from 1,000–2,000 applicants per cycle, yielding roughly 20–40 degrees annually early in the dynasty. Successful examinees entered the bureaucracy at junior ranks, often advancing via palace reviews or further service evaluations. The system promoted by enabling , particularly after 650 CE, when keju performance overtook family pedigree as the dominant predictor of official rank. Statistical analysis of 2,636 complete tomb epitaphs reveals that aristocratic ancestry conferred early advantages, comprising 24.5% of elites, but its influence waned as keju passers—rising to 17% post-690 CE—secured at least one higher rank than non-passers, accelerating the decline of hereditary clans. This shift reduced the aristocracy's monopoly on power, fostering a class aligned with imperial Confucian ideology and enabling commoners with education access to rise, though paternal status retained influence for those failing exams. Despite these advances, limitations persisted: the exams favored those with resources for prolonged study, excluding women, rural poor, and non-Han groups, while early Tang (pre-650 CE) still tilted toward noble backgrounds, with only 6.7% keju passers among elites. , such as or favoritism in grading, occasionally undermined fairness, and the system's emphasis on over practical skills drew for producing rote learners unsuited to challenges. Nonetheless, keju marked a causal pivot toward bureaucratic competence, sustaining Tang administration amid expansions and contributing to long-term renewal.

Local Governance and Census Systems

The Tang dynasty's local administrative structure formed a hierarchical system extending central authority to the grassroots level, comprising circuits (dào), prefectures (zhōu), and counties (xiàn). Circuits functioned primarily as oversight mechanisms rather than self-governing entities, grouping multiple prefectures for purposes of inspection, fiscal auditing, and policy enforcement; ten such circuits were established in 711 CE under Emperor Xuanzong to monitor local officials and curb . Prefectures, numbering around 358 in the early Tang, served as intermediate administrative units responsible for regional coordination, while counties—estimated at approximately 1,500—constituted the foundational level of , directly interfacing with rural populations. This tiered framework, inherited and refined from the , emphasized centralized control while delegating routine execution to appointed officials selected via merit or recommendation. Prefects (cìshǐ) headed prefectures, wielding authority over taxation, matters, , and defense, with enhanced powers in frontier zones where prefectures were reorganized as military area commands (dūdūfǔ) under dual civil-military governors (dūdū cìshǐ). County magistrates (xiàn lìng or xiàn zhōng) managed smaller jurisdictions, overseeing village elders and local militias, enforcing laws, and resolving disputes; their roles demanded intimate knowledge of terrain and customs to maintain order and extract resources efficiently. In conquered territories, such as the , specialized protectorates (dùhùfǔ) integrated non-Han areas into the system, appointing native or Han officials to balance assimilation with . Reforms during the dynasty, including the proliferation of defense commands (fānzhèn) by the mid-8th century, gradually eroded prefectural as military commissioners (jiédùshǐ) accrued independence, foreshadowing the dynasty's fragmentation. The and household registration system (hùjí) underpinned local governance by providing data for , taxation, and under the equal-field (jūntǐan) land distribution policy. Registers, compiled at the level and revised every three years, detailed composition, age, , , and taxable capacity, allocating inheritable "eternal" fields (yǒngyě tián) (kǒufèn) to ensure obligations in , , and labor service. A major in 742 CE recorded about 9 million , corresponding to roughly 50 million people, though evasion through underreporting or flight inflated actual figures and undermined revenues. Neglect in registrations intensified post- (755–763 CE), prompting fiscal shifts like the two-tax system (liǎng shuì fǎ) in 780 CE, which decoupled taxes from counts and tied them to and cash equivalents to address declining accuracy and peasant burdens.

Taxation, Corvée Labor, and Fiscal Policies

The Tang dynasty's early fiscal framework relied on the , formalized in a 624 under Gaozu, which surveyed and redistributed to taxable households to maximize agricultural output and revenue extraction. Adult males aged 18 to 60 received 100 mu of farmland (with women allocated half), while elderly and children got lesser hereditary plots; land reverted to the state upon the holder's death to prevent permanent concentration. This system underpinned the zu-yong-diao taxation (zu as grain rent at approximately 2 shi per 100 mu, yong as commutable , and diao as household tribute of 2 zhang silk or equivalent hemp), yielding the bulk of state income in kind to support bureaucracy, military, and granary reserves. Corvée labor (yong), integral to the zu-yong-diao regime, mandated 20 days of unpaid service annually from each able-bodied male for infrastructure like canals, roads, and palaces, though substitution with cloth (2 chi per day) or cash became common to ease peasant burdens and generate monetary revenue. Military conscripts, drawn from the fubing militia tied to equal-field allotments, received exemptions from both corvée and other taxes, incentivizing frontier defense amid expansionist campaigns. Exemptions extended to certain officials and monks, but evasion through underreporting household registers strained enforcement, contributing to fiscal shortfalls by the mid-8th century. The (755–763) devastated the through massive depopulation, abandoned lands, and elite land grabs, rendering fixed allocations obsolete and slashing tax yields. In response, Chancellor Yang Yan enacted the two-tax reform (liangshuifa) in 780, abolishing zu-yong-diao in favor of biannual levies—summer collections on harvested crops and autumn assessments on total household wealth and assets—payable in cash, grain, or cloth to adapt to fluid demographics and monetizing . This wealth-based approach initially boosted revenues for recovery efforts but facilitated inequality as richer households shifted burdens downward, while integrating urban commercial taxes at 2–3% on transactions. Late Tang fiscal policies emphasized monopolies to offset agricultural volatility, notably the salt administration (yanzheng) formalized in the 760s–780s, which controlled production and distribution via state-issued certificates, generating up to half of central revenues by restricting private trade and enforcing quotas on coastal and inland evaporators. Wine and iron monopolies followed sporadically, but corruption in distribution eroded gains; these measures, while stabilizing short-term deficits under emperors like Dezong (r. 779–805), underscored reliance on extractive controls amid eroding land-based taxation, hastening fiscal fragility by the 9th century.

Military Organization

Conscription Systems and Frontier Garrisons

The Tang dynasty's primary conscription system was the fubing (garrison soldier) militia, inherited from preceding dynasties and formalized under Emperor Taizong in 636 CE, whereby able-bodied males aged 21 to 59 from registered peasant households were selected based on household wealth, physical strength, and size to serve in territorial military units. Each fubing unit, organized under a zhechongfu (regimental headquarters), comprised 800 to 1,200 men subdivided into battalions of 200, platoons of 50, and squads of 10, with a peak of approximately 633 units totaling around 600,000 soldiers by the late 7th century. Soldiers underwent annual training, farmed allocated lands under the equal-field system during peacetime to sustain themselves, rotated for guard duties in the capitals of Chang'an and Luoyang (typically one month every three years), and were mobilized for campaigns, with families granted tax exemptions in lieu of providing equipment and provisions. Inner fubing s, numbering 16 elite units such as the Left and Right Guards, protected the capitals, while outer s—up to 633 in total, with 261 concentrated in the Guannei region—provided regional defense, including early frontier postings where soldiers doubled as agricultural colonists (tuntian) to support logistics. For border defense, the system initially relied on these conscripted militias rotated to frontiers like the northwest, supplemented by temporary levies (fangding) from prefectures for one-year terms and bingmu conscripts for expeditions, as seen in the mobilization of 44,000 men from 67 prefectures in 661 CE. However, prolonged campaigns against nomadic threats strained the rotational model, leading to the establishment of permanent professional frontier armies by the late 7th century, organized into regional commands (zhen or duhufu) such as the Anxi Protectorate's four in the (installed 648–658 CE) to hold defensive lines and facilitate expansion. By 742 CE, the frontier had evolved into ten major commands under jiedushi (military governors), each commanding 55,000 to 91,000 troops—including long-service jian'er professionals recruited voluntarily from landless populations, non-Han auxiliaries, and supported by tuntian colonies yielding over 1.9 million shi of grain annually by 749 CE, alongside vast horse pastures maintaining 325,700 mounts in 754 CE. These garrisons emphasized static defense with beacon networks manned by 31,000 to 68,000 troops for signaling invasions, distinguishing expeditionary cavalry forces for offensive operations from holding forces responsible for . Hereditary officers commanded fubing units with ranks from 2 to 8, but the system's decline accelerated in the mid-8th century due to desertions, elite aversion to , depletion of free peasant households amid land concentration, and the demands of extended warfare, prompting shifts to voluntary guoqi recruitment in 722 CE and strongman-led professional armies by 737 CE.

Major Campaigns and Territorial Expansions

The Tang dynasty conducted extensive military campaigns that expanded its territory to its greatest extent around 660–663 CE, incorporating regions in , the Mongolian steppes, and temporarily the Korean peninsula. These expansions were facilitated by a professionalized military incorporating Turkic and conscript forces, enabling offensives against nomadic confederations and neighboring kingdoms. Under Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649), Tang general Li Jing defeated the Eastern Turkic Khaganate in 630 CE, capturing Illig Qaghan and subduing the steppe nomads, which secured the northern frontiers and incorporated Mongolia into Tang sphere of influence. Subsequent campaigns against the Western Turks began in 640 CE, culminating in victories that established the Anxi Protectorate in the Tarim Basin to administer conquered oasis states. By 644 CE, Tang forces under Gao Shilian conquered Karasahr, followed by the capture of Kucha in 648 CE under Ashina Jun, extending control over key Silk Road routes. In , Taizong launched a major invasion of in 645 CE with approximately 113,000 troops and 50,000 logistics personnel, capturing several fortresses but failing to breach Ansi after a prolonged , leading to withdrawal amid winter hardships and disease. Under Gaozong (r. 649–683), Tang allied with to conquer Baekje in 660 CE and in 668 CE, deploying over 100,000 troops that toppled the kingdom's capital, though subsequent resistance expelled Tang garrisons by 676 CE, limiting long-term Korean control. Westward advances peaked with influence reaching the , but the in 751 CE saw Tang forces under , numbering around 10,000–30,000, defeated by an Abbasid-Karluk-Tibetan coalition of similar size near the Talas River, halting further expansion and prompting gradual abandonment of distant protectorates. In the southwest, campaigns against resulted in disasters, including the annihilation of 60,000 Tang troops in 751 CE and another force in 754 CE, underscoring the limits of overextended logistics. These efforts established Tang as a Eurasian power but strained resources, contributing to vulnerabilities exploited in later rebellions.

Protectorates, Tributaries, and Border Defense

![Tang Dynasty emissaries at the court of Varkhuman in Samarkand carrying silk and a string of silkworm cocoons, 648-651 CE, Afrasiyab murals, Samarkand][float-right] The Tang dynasty administered its expansive western frontiers through a system of protectorates, primarily the Anxi (Pacification of the West) and Beiting protectorates, established to secure Central Asian territories following military conquests. The Anxi Protectorate was founded in 640 CE after the submission of Gaochang, initially headquartered in Turfan before relocating to Kucha, overseeing the Tarim Basin oases including Kucha, Khotan, Kashgar, and Karashahr via the Four Garrisons installed between 648 and 658 CE. These outposts integrated local Indo-European and Turkic rulers under Tang military governors (dudu), who collected taxes, enforced conscription, and defended against nomadic incursions, thereby stabilizing Silk Road commerce. The Beiting Protectorate, created in 702 CE north of the Tarim Basin near modern Jimsar and Ürümqi, extended control over the Tianshan corridor and steppe fringes, coordinating with Anxi to counter threats from the Eastern Turks and later Uighurs. By circa 660 CE, these structures, alongside Anbei in Mongolia and Andong in Korea, projected Tang authority across Inner Asia, though their remoteness strained logistics and reliance on allied tribes like the Karluks. Tributary diplomacy complemented direct control, binding peripheral states in ritualized exchanges for mutual benefit without full annexation. Under Taizong (r. 626–649 CE), the system formalized as kingdoms dispatched envoys bearing local products—such as Korean ginseng, Japanese swords, and Tibetan horses—in return for Chinese silks, calendars, and investiture of rulers, affirming Tang cosmocratic supremacy while enabling regulated . Korea, unified in 668 CE with Tang military support against Baekje and , maintained steady tribute from 676 CE onward, adopting Tang bureaucratic models. sent over 18 missions between 630 and 838 CE, importing Tang legal codes and but rejecting full subordination. Southeast Asian polities like and , and Central Asian city-states, participated intermittently, with tribute peaks during prosperous reigns like Xuanzong's (712–756 CE), though pragmatic alliances often superseded ideology amid power shifts. Border defense integrated protectorates with the fanzhen (frontier command) network, evolving from centralized to semi-autonomous garrisons by the mid-8th century to counter Tibetan, Uighur, and Arab pressures. Northern and northwestern fanzhen, numbering around 10 major commands by 750 CE like Youzhou and Hedong, housed 500,000 troops in fortified towns with for signaling invasions, supplemented by nomadic auxiliaries and agricultural colonies (tuntian) for self-sufficiency. In the , sites reveal layered defenses—walls, moats, and watchtowers—coordinating with Anxi garrisons to repel Tibetan incursions post-763 CE. This decentralized approach, while effective initially against hit-and-run raids, fostered warlordism; the (755–763 CE) severed western protectorates, with seizing Anxi by 763 CE and Uighurs extracting tribute, exposing vulnerabilities in overextended supply lines and ethnic troop loyalties.

Military Decline and Internal Rebellions

The fubing militia system, which obligated landholding peasant households to provide rotational military service, proved unsustainable by the early amid prolonged frontier campaigns and land concentration that eroded the base of eligible conscripts. Reforms initiated around 711 shifted toward professional standing armies and (military governors) to guard expansive borders, imposing heavy fiscal strains while vesting regional commanders with combined civil-military authority. This empowered non-Han officers like , a Sogdian-Turkic general, but fragmented loyalty and central oversight. The , commencing December 16, 755, exemplified these vulnerabilities when , over three northern circuits commanding 150,000 troops, rebelled against perceived slights under Emperor Xuanzong and proclaimed the Yan dynasty. His forces seized in early 756 and soon after, compelling Xuanzong's flight to and the installation of his son Suzong. was murdered by his eunuch Li Zhu'er in January 757, but his son and ally perpetuated the uprising until Shi's death in 761 and the final suppression in February 763, aided by Uighur cavalry. The conflict inflicted catastrophic losses—traditional census figures indicate a population drop from 53 million to 17 million, though direct military casualties numbered around 1 million—and facilitated Tibetan conquests in the northwest, abrogating Tang dominance in the . Post-rebellion, the Tang escalated appointments to approximately 40 by 763 to reclaim stability, formalizing their hereditary tenure and tax exemptions by 781–784, which entrenched enclaves immune to imperial recall. factions seized control of the palace Shence Army around 788, monopolizing officer selections and exacerbating command rivalries. Sporadic internal revolts, including Yuan Chao's peasant uprising in the (762–763) and Pang Xun's of Shuo Fang troops (868), further strained depleted resources and highlighted the militia's obsolescence. The Huang Chao Rebellion (875–884) accelerated terminal decline amid famines, oppressive salt taxes, and corvée burdens, as salt smuggler Huang Chao mobilized with allies like Wang Xianzhi and Shang Rang. Their forces swelled to hundreds of thousands, sacking Guangzhou in 879 before capturing Chang'an in 881, where Huang enthroned himself as emperor of Qi. Imperial counteroffensives, reliant on jiedushi like Li Keyong's Shatuo cavalry, reclaimed the capitals by 883, but Huang's guerrilla tactics prolonged chaos until his death in 884. The revolt's devastation—marked by urban massacres and economic collapse—empowered figures like Zhu Quanzhong, whose machinations ended Tang rule in 907, underscoring the military's inability to integrate professional forces under unified command.

Economy

Agricultural Foundations and Land Reforms

The Tang dynasty's agricultural economy rested on intensive cultivation of staple crops such as in the south, and millet in the north, supplemented by soybeans, , and peaches introduced via trade routes. infrastructure expanded significantly, with the administration completing 1,088 large-scale projects, 40 flood-control efforts, and 27 improvements to enhance productivity and mitigate . These foundations supported from approximately 50 million in 609 to over 80 million by the mid-8th century, underpinning fiscal stability through grain surpluses and labor mobilization. Central to these foundations was the equal-field system (juntian), a land allocation reform refined from Northern Wei and Sui precedents and formalized under Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649) to equitably distribute arable land and curb elite accumulation. Under this system, land was surveyed and granted to taxable adult males aged 21–59, with each recipient allocated 80 mu (approximately 5.3 hectares or 13 acres), of which one-quarter constituted permanent hereditary tenure (yongye tian) and the remainder temporary allocations (koufen tian) reverting to the state upon the holder's death, incapacity, or migration. Allocations scaled with household labor capacity, excluding women, slaves, and livestock from counts, to ensure sufficient taxable units for grain, cloth, and corvée obligations. This initially bolstered state revenues and military conscription by tying land rights to service, fostering early Tang prosperity through stabilized peasant holdings and reduced . However, by the mid-8th century, demographic pressures, soil exhaustion, and evasion via illegal sales or concealment undermined the system, as exceeded allocatable land in fertile regions, prompting a shift to the two-tax law in 780 that privatized holdings and taxed based on actual yield rather than fixed allotments.

Internal Commerce and Market Regulations

The Tang dynasty's internal commerce relied on an extensive network of roads and waterways, including the Grand Canal, which facilitated the transport of goods such as grain, textiles, and salt across regions from the north to the south. The government maintained these infrastructure systems to support domestic trade, enabling seasonal markets in smaller towns and major urban centers like and to distribute products from various provinces. In , the capital, eastern and western markets featured over 3,000 stalls organized by commercial branches known as hang, which functioned as proto-guilds coordinating distribution among merchants and craftsmen. Market regulations were enforced by dedicated officials, including two market directors in who supervised weights, measures, goods quality, and currency exchanges involving silk bolts and copper coins like the kaiyuan tongbao introduced in 621 CE. These commissioners prohibited unfair practices such as cornering commodities or deceiving buyers, issuing fixed prices every ten days for three grades of essential goods to stabilize supply and prevent . Merchants were confined to designated market areas, with long-distance traders subjected to checks and ; sales of , slaves, or required official certificates to ensure transparency and taxation. The state exerted control over key sectors through monopolies, notably on salt, where production and distribution were managed via 13 touring brokerages, banning private vending to secure revenue and supply. Similar oversight applied to iron and other metals early in the dynasty, though private handicrafts proliferated in southern regions. Hanghui associations among merchants self-regulated aspects like quality and pricing within markets, while the emergence of night markets in urban areas expanded trade hours and boosted tax collection, gradually eroding strict residential-market separations. By the mid-8th century, following the (755–763 CE), weakening central authority led to relaxed regulations, allowing more open markets with reduced bureaucratic oversight and fostering merchant autonomy. Complementary mechanisms included state granaries (changpingcang) for price stabilization during famines and early bills of exchange (feiqian) used by traders for secure payments, particularly in tea and salt dealings. These policies balanced commerce promotion with fiscal control, though enforcement varied, contributing to economic vibrancy until late-dynastic fiscal strains.

Silk Road Trade and Overland Exchanges

![Tang Dynasty emissaries at the court of Varkhuman in Samarkand carrying silk and silkworm cocoons, 648-651 CE][float-right] The Tang dynasty (618–907 CE) oversaw a peak in overland trade along the Silk Road, facilitated by military expansions that secured key routes through the Tarim Basin and Central Asia. In 640 CE, Tang general Hou Junji conquered the Gaochang kingdom, establishing protectorates that extended Chinese influence westward and protected caravan passages from nomadic disruptions. By the mid-7th century, the Anxi Protectorate oversaw four garrison towns—Kucha, Khotan, Karasahr, and Kashgar—ensuring safe transit for merchants transporting silk, porcelain, and tea eastward imports of horses, glassware, furs, and precious stones. This control generated revenue through tariffs and tribute, bolstering the Tang economy amid agricultural taxes. Trade caravans departed from , traversing the Corridor into the Tarim oases, then onward to and Persia, exchanging Chinese —prized for its quality and monopoly—for Central Asian and western luxuries like spices and dyes. Sogdian merchants dominated intermediation, leveraging multilingual skills to bridge cultures, while Tang policies encouraged foreign traders in capital markets. Archaeological evidence from Turfan documents a surge in commercial activity post-640 CE conquest, with local economies integrating silk exports and imported goods stimulating urbanization. Beyond commodities, overland routes transmitted technologies such as advanced metallurgy and sericulture techniques, alongside cultural elements including Buddhist scriptures, which flourished under imperial patronage. Nestorian Christianity and Manichaeism reached China via Sogdian communities, evidenced by 8th-century steles in Chang'an, while musical instruments and dances from Central Asia influenced Tang court aesthetics. These exchanges enriched Tang cosmopolitanism but waned after the 755 CE An Lushan Rebellion, as Tibetan incursions and internal strife eroded frontier defenses, fragmenting trade networks by the late 8th century.

Maritime Trade and Seaports

During the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE), maritime trade flourished along the southern coasts, complementing overland routes disrupted by conflicts such as the (755–763 CE), with emerging as the primary hub for exchanges reaching , , the , and beyond. Ships departed from via the , often stopping at ports in (modern ) and before navigating the to destinations like , the , and . This network, known retrospectively as the , was dominated by Arab and Persian sailors and merchants rather than Chinese vessels, which were fewer and typically coastal. Key ports included , , , and Mingzhou (modern ), collectively termed the "four great harbors," though monopolized foreign commerce due to its regulated foreign quarters (fanke) housing thousands of overseas traders. Guangzhou's market commissioner (shihuo shi) oversaw under imperial edicts, imposing taxes on imports and exports while restricting foreigners to designated zones to maintain order and extract revenue; goods arriving by sea were often appraised and auctioned by officials to prevent . Arab and Persian merchants, arriving in increasing numbers from the late seventh century, settled in these quarters, bringing and facilitating direct voyages from the ; by the mid-eighth century, their communities numbered in the thousands, engaging in wholesale of luxuries. Exports from Tang ports primarily consisted of ceramics (including green-glazed ware), textiles, coins, and metalwares like gold cups and silver ingots, as evidenced by the (ca. 830 CE), an dhow carrying over 60,000 Chinese ceramics bound for the . Imports included spices, , pearls, horn, glassware, and aromatics from and , which were valued for medicinal and luxury uses in Tang elite circles. Quanzhou gained prominence as a secondary during the Tang, supporting and in and dyes, while connecting to inland networks via the Min River; its role expanded as faced occasional unrest, such as the 758 CE raid by Persian and forces amid frontier tensions. , though more focused on internal , contributed through its workshops producing export goods like silverware, and Mingzhou handled coastal routes to and Korea. Government policies, including bans on private Chinese long-distance voyages (lifted sporadically), ensured state control, but foreign initiative drove volume, with archaeological finds like dated Tang coins (758–845 CE) from wrecks confirming sustained direct links. This maritime orientation introduced technologies such as advanced navigation and ship designs, enriching Tang economy despite risks from and monsoons.

Society

Social Hierarchy and Elite Families

Tang society exhibited a rigid hierarchical structure, with the and imperial clan occupying the paramount position, wielding absolute authority over governance, , and ritual matters. Beneath them stood the super-elite , comprising prestigious documented in genealogical records tracing back to the Wei-Jin period, which maintained their status through inherited prestige rather than feudal landholdings. These elites were stratified into four regional aristocracies: northeastern rooted in Han-era lineages from ; northwestern families, including the Tang ruling Li house with partial Turkic influences and a orientation; northern Shanxi groups with Central Asian ties; and Yangzi Valley lineages from the Southern Dynasties emphasizing cultural refinement. were identified by and geographic origin, such as the Cui of Boling or the Lu of Fanyang, and enjoyed legal privileges under the Tang Code, including lighter punishments for crimes and sumptuary rights dictating exclusive attire, carriages, and dwellings. The broader hierarchy descended from this super-elite to approximately 100 "scholar clans" (shizu) per locality, forming a lower tier of who sponsored kin in and office-holding; below them were commoners designated as "" (liangmin), encompassing peasants as primary taxpayers, artisans producing goods, and merchants restricted by and regulatory policies despite occasional wealth accumulation. At the base were private retainers and "base people" (jianmin), including musicians, slaves, and those degraded by debt, crime, or hereditary status, with limited upward mobility as slaves remained tied to masters post-manumission. The scholar-official class (shi), overlapping with elites, derived prestige from civil service examinations like the jinshi degree, which tested classical knowledge, physical fitness, and verbal skills, though early access favored wealthy families capable of prolonged . Elite families preserved their dominance through endogamous marriages within status equals, extensive kin networks for mutual sponsorship in careers, and meticulous genealogies authenticating pedigree, which conferred advantages in appointments and social standing during the dynasty's early phases from 618 to circa 650 CE, when aristocratic ancestry elevated career ranks by approximately two grades. However, the imperial examination system (keju), formalized post-618, gradually eroded this pedigree-based privilege; by the mid-7th century after 650 CE, aristocratic advantages ceased to significantly predict higher office, supplanted by exam performance, which by the dynasty's end boosted ranks by up to four grades, as evidenced in analysis of 3,640 tomb epitaphs. This shift fostered greater , undermining the super-'s monopoly, though familial influence via paternal office-holding persisted, particularly for non-exam passers, contributing to the aristocratic families' decline by the late Tang around 907 CE.

Family Structure and Inheritance Practices

The Tang family was fundamentally patrilineal, organized around male lineage descent, ancestor veneration, and Confucian principles of that mandated sons' support for parents and elders. Households typically comprised multiple generations co-residing under the authority of the senior male, with an ideal of four or five generations living together, though practical sizes ranged from 10 to 20 members driven by agrarian labor needs and state-enforced obligations. This structure transitioned during the dynasty from simpler nuclear units toward stem families—consisting of parents, a married eldest son, his wife, and their children—and extended families incorporating collateral kin, reflecting economic cooperation and ritual requirements for ancestral rites that extended beyond elites to commoners. Inheritance practices were codified in the Tang Code (Tang Lü Shu Yi), which emphasized equal division of family property—land, housing, and movable goods—among sons upon the parents' death or , rejecting to promote and prevent aristocratic consolidation. Legitimate sons (di zi, born to the principal wife) held precedence in succession for family headship if the primary heir died, with his eldest di grandson inheriting over shu zi (sons of concubines), but property shares were generally equalized among all sons, including adopted heirs who bore equivalent rights and duties. Daughters received dowries or marriage portions as their primary claim, though in cases of no surviving sons or widow, unmarried daughters could collectively inherit the estate; violations of division agreements, such as unequal shares, incurred fines like one bolt of silk or 15 bushels of wheat, enforced via legal deeds preserved in regions like . These practices reinforced , where married daughters moved to husbands' households, and communal property holding during parents' lifetime to sustain yangshan (support obligations), but equal shares among sons often fragmented holdings over generations, contributing to land pressures despite Tang reforms. networks, while influential among elites for political alliances, diminished in hereditary power as the curtailed privileges of great families like the "big five" Wang zu, shifting emphasis to merit-based .

Gender Roles, Marriage, and Women's Status

In the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE), women experienced relatively greater personal freedoms and social visibility than in earlier Han or later periods, including riding horses astride, playing , and adopting cosmopolitan Hu-style attire that emphasized mobility over modesty, such as low-cut blouses and . Elite women from aristocratic families often received education in , , and , enabling some to author works or advise on , while urban women participated in markets and as dancers or musicians. Nonetheless, Confucian norms reinforced patrilineal inheritance and male authority, positioning women as dependents first of fathers, then husbands, and finally sons, with legal codes like the Tang Code (653 CE) upholding these hierarchies despite isolated exceptions. The reign of (r. 690–705 CE), the only woman to claim the imperial throne as emperor, exemplified peak female agency in politics but did not catalyze systemic elevation of women's status; she consolidated power through alliances and merit-based exams favoring her supporters, while perpetuating concubine systems and executing rivals, including members, without altering patriarchal property laws or marriage customs for the broader populace. Her rule challenged gender norms symbolically—promoting that critiqued male dominance—but primarily served dynastic legitimacy rather than feminist ideals, as subsequent Tang empresses wielded influence informally through sons or husbands rather than independent authority. Marriage customs adhered to the "three letters and six rites" framework, involving betrothal gifts, for compatibility, and rituals like the hair-combing ceremony originating in Tang, where couples bound strands symbolizing unity; families arranged unions for alliances, with grooms typically aged 15 and brides 13 to ensure fertility and lineage continuity. prevailed among elites, permitting multiple wives and concubines under the qie system, but women retained and premarital property as zifu, which husbands could not alienate without consent, per Tang statutes; was allowable for incompatibility, sterility, or abuse, enabling some women to remarry or manage households independently, though deterred initiation by wives. Widows held stronger claims to family estates than in later eras, administering lands and suing male kin for mismanagement under equal-field system allotments—peasant women received 20 mu (about 1.3 hectares) taxable holdings—fostering economic autonomy for some, though daughters inherited only if sonless, and remarriage often transferred control to new husbands. Rural women, comprising most of the population, focused on textile production and agriculture, with limited mobility due to labor demands, underscoring class-based variances in gender roles rather than uniform liberation.

Ethnic Integration and Foreign Residents

The Tang dynasty's capitals, particularly , served as hubs for foreign residents drawn by commerce, diplomatic missions, and military alliances, fostering a degree of ethnic integration unprecedented in prior Chinese history. 's population included around 50,000 non-Han individuals, encompassing both domestic ethnic groups and foreigners primarily from , Persia, and the . These residents, often arriving as traders or refugees, contributed to the urban economy through specialized crafts, entertainment, and intermediary roles in international exchange. Sogdians, Iranian-speaking Central Asians, formed one of the largest foreign communities, settling in northern Chinese cities during the Wei-Jin through Tang periods as merchants, scribes, and performers. Genetic and historical evidence indicates their gradual assimilation, with families adopting local languages, intermarrying, and relocating to Han-dominated areas over generations, though initial concentrations occurred in ethnic enclaves. Tang legal codes distinguished foreigners by nationality, applying their home laws to intra-group disputes while subjecting inter-ethnic cases to Chinese statutes, which facilitated controlled integration but preserved separate communal identities. Similarly, and concentrated in southern ports like , where approximately 10,000 foreign merchants resided by the ninth century, engaging in maritime trade and occasionally establishing places of worship for or . Military service provided another avenue for integration, particularly for Turkic nomads incorporated into Tang forces following conquests of the Eastern and Western Turks in the seventh century. Turkic soldiers, valued for cavalry expertise, filled ranks in the imperial army, with some attaining high command, though this reliance later fueled instabilities like the of 755, led by a general of Sogdian-Turkic descent. Despite such tensions, foreign residents influenced Tang culture through adopted fashions, dances, and religious practices, with Hu-style entertainments—originating from Central Asian "Hu" peoples—gaining popularity in court and urban settings. Over time, post-rebellion policies and the dynasty's weakening grip on frontiers accelerated assimilation or expulsion, diminishing overt foreign presence by the late Tang.

Culture

Urban Life in Chang'an and Luoyang

, the principal capital of the Tang dynasty from 618 to 907, exemplified imperial with its rectangular grid layout spanning approximately 84 square kilometers, divided into northern imperial enclosures, two principal markets, and about 108 to 110 walled residential wards known as fang. Major avenues, some reaching widths of 150 meters, intersected the city orthogonally, facilitating orderly vehicular and pedestrian traffic while segregating functions to enforce . The population of reached an estimated 700,000 to 1.6 million inhabitants at its Tang peak, making it one of the world's largest cities, though density varied with lower figures in peripheral wards and higher concentrations near markets and administrative centers. , the auxiliary eastern capital—expanded during the dynasty and briefly primary under Empress from 690 to 705—mirrored this grid-based structure on a reduced scale, serving as a secondary hub for governance and residence when political exigencies demanded relocation from . Urban existence adhered to stringent regulations, including nightly curfews enforced by ward gates that locked at dusk and reopened at dawn, confining movement to daylight hours to curb crime and uphold order across both capitals. Within this framework, daily routines centered on commerce in segregated markets—each in covering roughly one square kilometer at key transport nodes—where merchants, including Central Asian Sogdians, traded silks, spices, and exotics amid regulated stalls and periodic fairs. Social and cultural vibrancy permeated these spaces, with over 192 Buddhist temples dotting 's wards, alongside entertainment precincts featuring singers, dancers, and public spectacles that drew diverse ethnic residents from Persians to Turks, fostering a cosmopolitan milieu despite residential segregation. Architectural landmarks, such as the Big Wild Goose Pagoda in completed in 652 for storing scriptures, underscored the integration of religious infrastructure into urban fabric, while palatial complexes like the Daming Palace hosted elite amusements including (proto-football) and music performances accessible to varying degrees by the urban populace. In , analogous imperial halls and temples reinforced similar patterns of regulated yet dynamic civic life, though on a less grandiose scale reflective of its subordinate status.

Poetry, Literature, and Intellectual Pursuits

The Tang dynasty (618–907) represented the apex of , characterized by formal innovation, thematic depth, and prolific output amid cultural prosperity and imperial patronage. Poets composed in refined genres such as jintishi (modern-style poetry), which emphasized tonal harmony and structural parallelism, with lüshi (regulated verse)—typically eight lines of five or seven characters each—emerging as a hallmark form perfected during this period. This stylistic rigor reflected the era's intellectual emphasis on precision and aesthetic balance, often tested in examinations that rewarded poetic skill. High Tang poets like Li Bai (701–762) and Du Fu (712–770) exemplified divergent yet complementary approaches, with Li Bai's works evoking Daoist transcendence through vivid imagery of mountains, rivers, and revelry, as in his verses on wine and immortality, while Du Fu's addressed human suffering, political turmoil, and moral duty, earning him the title "poet-sage" for pieces reflecting the An Lushan Rebellion's devastation (755–763). Wang Wei (701–761), a multifaceted scholar-official, painter, and musician, blended Chan Buddhist introspection with nature depictions, influencing later landscape poetry through subtle, evocative restraint. These figures, active during the dynasty's mid-eighth-century peak, produced thousands of surviving poems that prioritized emotional authenticity over didacticism, contrasting earlier abstracted styles. In literature beyond poetry, Tang writers advanced prose historiography and fiction, compiling foundational texts like the Old Book of Tang (completed circa 945, drawing on contemporary records) and early vernacular tales such as those in the Taiping Guangji anthology, which incorporated supernatural motifs from oral traditions. Intellectual pursuits flourished through state-sponsored academies and private , fostering debates on and ; late Tang thinkers like (768–824) spearheaded the guwen (ancient prose) movement, advocating concise, classical styles over ornate parallel prose (pianwen) to revive Confucian primacy against Buddhist and Daoist influences. Han's 819 "Memorial on the Buddha's Bone" protested Emperor Xianzong's relic , prioritizing rational imperial policy and moral orthodoxy, ideas that prefigured Song Neo-Confucianism despite his demotion. Associates like Liu Zongyuan (773–819) extended this critique, composing essays on and administrative reform that underscored causal links between virtue and societal order. Such endeavors, amid dynastic decline, highlighted a shift toward pragmatic over metaphysical speculation.

Arts: Painting, Calligraphy, and Ceramics

The Tang dynasty marked a pinnacle in , characterized by technical sophistication, expressive realism, and bold brushwork that captured dynamic forms and natural essences. Court painters developed the blue-green landscape style, employing fine lines enhanced with mineral colors to depict misty mountains and ethereal scenes, reflecting both indigenous traditions and subtle integrations from Central Asian aesthetics introduced via exchanges. This period's artists prioritized lifelike proportions in figures and horses, often infusing works with vitality through fluid, energetic strokes. Wu Daozi (c. 680–760), revered as a foundational figure in Tang painting, pioneered the "whirling brushstroke" technique, enabling rapid, sweeping lines that conveyed motion and spiritual depth in religious murals and secular compositions across temples in and . His surviving attributions, such as depictions of deities and landscapes, demonstrate mastery in on or walls, influencing subsequent dynasties' . Han Gan (706–783), specializing in equine portraits like Night-Shining White, exemplified realism in animal subjects, using meticulous shading to highlight musculature and coat textures, often for imperial patrons. Foreign motifs, including Central Asian riders and exotic fauna, appeared in tomb frescoes and handscrolls, underscoring cosmopolitan patronage amid Tang expansion. Tang calligraphy flourished as an art form integral to scholarly and administrative life, evolving through court-sanctioned regularity, literati experimentation, and religious inscriptions. Early masters like Ouyang Xun (557–641) established the "Ou-style" (kaishu), prized for its symmetrical structure, precise proportions, and enduring balance, as seen in steles such as the Jiucheng Palace Stele (645). Contemporaries Yu Shinan (558–638), Chu Suiliang (596–658), and Xue Ji (649–713) refined this script's elegance, setting standards for official documents with fluid yet disciplined strokes. Mid-Tang innovations included Yan Zhenqing's (709–785) bold (lishu variant), characterized by vigorous, upright forms evoking moral fortitude, exemplified in the Yan Family Temple Stele (762). Cursive and running scripts gained prominence among individualists; Huai Su (725–785), a monk, produced wild, storm-like (caoshu) resembling "snakes and dragons," pushing expressive boundaries in works like . These styles, practiced on or with brushes, reflected Tang poets' rhythmic sensibilities and were disseminated via temple carvings and elite collections. Ceramics in the Tang era innovated with (three-color) , fired at low temperatures around 800–1000°C, yielding vibrant yellows, greens, and creamy whites from iron, , and lead oxides. This technique, peaking in the at kilns near , produced tomb furnishings like molded camels, horses, and attendants, often splashed or trailed with glazes mimicking textiles or fur. 's effects stemmed from layered slips and uncontrolled glaze flows during firing, enabling naturalistic details in equestrian figures symbolizing imperial mobility. Variants incorporated cobalt-blue splashes, hinting at Persian influences via maritime trade, while utilitarian whitewares and celadons coexisted for daily use. These wares' durability and aesthetic appeal facilitated export along Roads, evidencing Tang prowess.

Music, Dance, and Entertainment

The Tang dynasty marked a golden age for Chinese , characterized by the synthesis of indigenous traditions with foreign influences from and beyond, facilitated by the era's extensive trade and cultural exchanges along the . Emperor Xuanzong (r. 712–756 CE) played a pivotal role in institutionalizing musical by establishing the Pear Garden (Liyuan) academy around 714 CE near , which served as a conservatory training professional musicians, dancers, and performers for court entertainments. This academy produced disciples who performed at imperial banquets and ceremonies, contributing to the development of early operatic forms through integrated and dramatic . Musical ensembles expanded in complexity, incorporating a broader array of instruments compared to earlier dynasties, such as in the daqu banquet style, which featured percussion, strings, and winds to accompany elaborate performances. Dance in Tang China reflected the dynasty's cosmopolitanism, with indigenous forms blending alongside imported styles from Sogdian and other Central Asian regions. The Hu Xuan (or Sogdian Whirl) dance, originating from areas like , gained widespread popularity, involving rapid spins on small round carpets by performers in flowing attire, often depicted in cave murals from the period. This whirling style, known for its rhythmic intensity and graceful rotations, was performed at and festivals, symbolizing the Tang court's openness to exotic entertainments that enhanced imperial prestige. Courtly dance troupes, trained alongside musicians in institutions like the Pear Garden, executed synchronized routines with large bands, incorporating elements of and mime to narrate historical or mythical themes. Entertainment during the Tang extended beyond music and dance to encompass lavish banquets, theatrical skits, and spectator sports that underscored social hierarchies and elite leisure. Imperial feasts frequently featured daqu performances combining song, instrumental music, and dance, serving as backdrops for diplomatic receptions and celebrations. Early theatrical traditions emerged from Pear Garden trainees, who staged narrative pieces with dialogue, costumes, and props, laying groundwork for later . Outdoor amusements included matches among the , imported from Persia, which involved teams on horseback striking a ball with mallets, fostering camaraderie and physical prowess at grounds. Public spectacles in urban centers like also involved jugglers, puppeteers, and animal acts, drawing crowds to markets and temples, though access was often stratified by class.

Religion and Philosophy

Confucianism's Role in Governance

The Tang dynasty (618–907 CE) entrenched Confucianism as the foundational ideology for its bureaucratic administration, inheriting and systematizing the civil service examination process initiated under the Sui. Examinations, conducted triennially from the early Tang, assessed candidates on the Confucian Five Classics—Shijing, Shujing, Liji, Zhouli, and Yijing—alongside poetry, history, and policy essays, prioritizing moral reasoning and classical knowledge over martial skills or heredity. This system produced degrees like jinshi (presented scholar), enabling social mobility for educated commoners, though pass rates remained low—often under 1%—and elite lineages retained advantages through private tutoring. By 650 CE, the exams had become the primary avenue for bureaucratic entry, staffing the central ministries and provincial posts with scholar-officials who viewed governance through a Confucian lens of hierarchical harmony and ritual propriety. Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649 CE), whose Zhenguan era exemplified pragmatic rule, elevated by integrating its ethics into policy-making, stressing the sovereign's virtue as the Mandate of Heaven's prerequisite. He solicited candid remonstrance from advisors, as recorded in the Zhenguan zhengyao, embodying Confucian ideals of the ruler as moral exemplar who heeds wise counsel to avert dynastic decline. In 628 CE, Taizong as Duke Wenxuan of the State of Lu, a title affirming the sage's orthodoxy and spurring state-sponsored academies like the , where officials studied classics under imperial patronage. This promotion countered Buddhism's cultural sway, positioning as the state's unifying doctrine for loyalty, , and meritocratic order. Confucian principles shaped Tang legal and fiscal reforms, blending with Legalist mechanisms for enforcement while prioritizing ethical governance. The equal-field land system, codified under Taizong, allocated holdings based on household registers to foster agrarian stability, reflecting Confucian emphases on benevolent rule and over exploitation. The Tanglü shuyi (Tang Code of 653 CE), the dynasty's penal framework, embedded Confucian hierarchies—distinguishing punishments by and status—to maintain ritual order, influencing subsequent dynasties' . Yet, amid cosmopolitan influences, Confucianism's role was pragmatic rather than dogmatic; emperors like Xuanzong (r. 712–756 CE) tolerated doctrinal rivals but relied on Confucian bureaucracy for administrative continuity, ensuring its dominance in elite education and imperial legitimacy until the dynasty's fragmentation.

Buddhism's Expansion and Economic Impact

Buddhism reached its zenith in during the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE), benefiting from imperial patronage that facilitated widespread institutional growth and doctrinal development. Emperors such as Taizong (r. 626–649 CE) and Gaozong (r. 649–683 CE) supported the religion despite personal Daoist leanings, sponsoring translations of scriptures and the construction of monasteries. The pilgrim-monk Xuanzang's journey to (629–645 CE) and subsequent translation efforts under Taizong's auspices introduced key texts, enriching with Indian philosophical depth. Empress (r. 690–705 CE), who briefly ruled as emperor, elevated politically, proclaiming herself a buddha incarnation and commissioning texts like the Commentary on the Meanings of the Great Cloud Sutra to legitimize her authority. This patronage spurred numerical expansion, with monasteries proliferating across the empire. By the mid-9th century, prior to major suppressions, China hosted approximately 4,600 large monasteries and 40,000 smaller temples and shrines, sustaining around 260,000 ordained monks and nuns. The faith's appeal drew converts from diverse ethnic groups, including Central Asians integrated via Tang conquests, fostering the Sinification of Buddhism through indigenous sects like Chan (Zen), Tiantai, Huayan, and Pure Land, which adapted doctrines to Chinese cosmology and emphasized meditation or devotional practices over ritualism. State policies, including tax exemptions for clergy and temple lands, accelerated this growth, embedding Buddhism in urban centers like Chang'an and Luoyang, where it influenced art, literature, and daily life. Economically, Buddhist institutions amassed significant wealth, owning vast tax-exempt estates that reduced state revenue and for lay farmers. Monasteries engaged in , , and proto-banking, such as "inexhaustible treasuries" for lending and pawnshops, generating surplus through donations, fees, and in , oils, and scriptures. This accumulation strained the Tang economy, as monks were exempt from labor and taxation, diverting resources amid fiscal pressures from wars and projects; estimates suggest temples controlled up to 20–30% of cultivated land in some regions by the 9th century. The clergy's non-participation in productive labor exacerbated labor shortages, contributing to perceptions of as parasitic on the agrarian base. These tensions culminated in the Huichang Persecution (842–846 CE) under Emperor Wuzong (r. 840–846 CE), motivated by economic recovery and Daoist favoritism. The edict dismantled 4,600 monasteries and 40,000 temples, defrocked 260,000 monks and nuns—reintegrating them into taxable society—and confiscated bronze statues melted for 150 million coins to fund military campaigns and alchemical pursuits. Recovered lands and wealth temporarily bolstered state coffers, highlighting Buddhism's fiscal burden, though the faith rebounded post-persecution, underscoring its resilience despite periodic suppressions driven by pragmatic fiscal realism rather than doctrinal hostility alone.

Daoism, Folk Beliefs, and Imperial Patronage

The Tang ruling Li family asserted descent from , the attributed author of the Daodejing, positioning Daoism as a dynastic cult and securing its preferential treatment over rival faiths like . This genealogical linkage, first prominently invoked by Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649 CE), justified state investments in Daoist infrastructure, including temple constructions across the empire and the elevation of Laozi's birthplace at Luyi to a sacred site with official oversight. By framing Daoism as ancestral orthodoxy, emperors leveraged it for legitimacy, integrating its rituals into court ceremonies to symbolize harmony between ruler and cosmos. Emperor Xuanzong (r. 712–756 CE) intensified this patronage, proclaiming Daoism the empire's official religion and requiring its classics in state-sponsored to cultivate bureaucratic alignment with Daoist cosmology. In 748 CE, he ordered the systematic cataloging of Daoist scriptures, producing the Sandong qionggang and initiating the Kaiyuan , an early canon organizing texts into the Three Caverns (scriptural categories) and Four Auxiliaries (supplementary works) for ritual and alchemical use. These measures, alongside Xuanzong's personal immersion in Daoist meditation and elixirs, spurred institutional growth, with over 1,200 Daoist priests registered by mid-reign and state funds allocated for immortality-focused observances at sacred peaks. Folk beliefs, comprising shamanistic invocations, geomantic practices, and worship of nature spirits and ancestors, endured among rural and urban masses, frequently merging with Daoist frameworks to address everyday exigencies like health and prosperity. Daoism incorporated folk deities—such as deified heroes and local guardians—into its expansive pantheon, adapting talismans, exorcisms, and cults to popular needs while imperial edicts subsidized hybrid temples that hosted communal festivals. This , bolstered by state exemptions for Daoist clergy from labor, enabled Daoism to function as a conduit for folk devotions, though periodic persecutions, like the 845 CE under Emperor Wuzong, temporarily disrupted such integrations by targeting clerical wealth accumulation.

Foreign Faiths: Zoroastrianism, Manichaeism, Nestorian Christianity

The Tang dynasty's expansive trade networks along the introduced , primarily practiced by Sogdian and Persian merchants, who established fire temples in major cities such as and . Archaeological evidence, including ossuaries with Zoroastrian motifs unearthed in , and textual records indicate temples dedicated to the religion—known in Chinese as xīānjiào (祆教)—existed by the early , with one noted at the northern wall of Luoyang's eastern capital. Imperial tolerance allowed these communities to maintain rituals like and festivals, though the faith remained confined to foreign enclaves without significant proselytization among , reflecting its ethnic association rather than doctrinal appeal. Manichaeism, another Persian-origin faith propagated by Sogdian traders, gained a foothold in Tang China during the 7th-8th centuries, with scriptures translated into Chinese under imperial auspices in 731, though an edict banned public practice shortly thereafter in 732. Despite periodic suppression, Manichaean communities persisted in southeastern regions like , adapting elements from to evade scrutiny, as evidenced by later texts blending Manichaean cosmology with local motifs. The religion's dualistic , emphasizing light versus darkness, appealed to some merchants but faced growing restrictions; a major crackdown in 843 under Emperor Wuzong dismantled temples and forced conversions, targeting its economic holdings alongside other foreign creeds. Nestorian Christianity, termed Jīngjiào (景教, "Luminous Religion") in Chinese sources, arrived via Syriac missionaries from Persia, with the monk reaching in 635 and receiving imperial permission from Emperor Taizong to construct the Daqin Temple. The , erected in 781, records over 150 years of activity, including ordinations, translations of scriptures, and monastic establishments across the empire, underscoring state patronage during cosmopolitan peaks. Like its counterparts, thrived among Central Asian expatriates, contributing to military aid during the An Lushan Rebellion (755-763), but endured the 845 persecution, which razed churches and scattered adherents, limiting its enduring footprint. These faiths coexisted under Tang , often within Sogdian merchant quarters, but their foreign character and competition with dominant and Daoism curtailed mass conversion; suppressions in the , driven by fiscal motives to reclaim temple lands, effectively marginalized them by the dynasty's end. Primary evidence from steles, edicts, and artifacts confirms their presence as elite, trade-linked minorities rather than transformative forces in Chinese .

Science and Technology

Woodblock Printing and Papermaking

, originating in the around 105 CE with Cai Lun's innovations using mulberry bark and rags, saw significant refinements during the Tang era (618–907 CE) that enhanced production efficiency and paper quality. Pulp processing and drying techniques improved, yielding stronger and more consistent sheets suitable for widespread bureaucratic, literary, and artistic applications. By the mid-to-late Tang, emerged as a key raw material due to its rapid growth, abundance, and superior long-fiber properties, which produced finer, more durable compared to earlier plant-based pulps. These advancements facilitated diverse uses beyond writing, including the folding and of into tea bags for flavor preservation, as well as rudimentary paper cups and napkins, reflecting paper's integration into daily commerce and hygiene. The technique's spread accelerated after the in 751 CE, where Tang forces clashed with Abbasid Arabs; captured Chinese papermakers disseminated the knowledge to the Islamic world, enabling paper mills in by the 8th century and eventual transmission to via trade routes. This diffusion stemmed from empirical capture of skilled artisans rather than voluntary exchange, underscoring the causal role of military conflict in technological transfer. Woodblock printing emerged in Tang China around 600–700 CE, likely evolving from ancient seal-stamping practices on silk or bamboo, with the method involving carving text or images in reverse relief on wooden blocks, inking the surface, and pressing moist paper against it for replication. Initially driven by Buddhist dissemination, as the faith's expansion demanded mass-produced sutras and icons, the technique enabled efficient copying of religious texts amid Tang's cosmopolitan patronage of monasteries. By the dynasty's latter half, printing had matured, with blocks yielding hundreds of impressions before wear, though labor-intensive carving limited it to high-demand works like scriptures rather than daily ephemera. The earliest surviving complete printed book, the Diamond Sutra (a Buddhist text), dates to 868 CE under Tang rule, featuring intricate illustrations and colophons attesting to its production for merit-making. Earlier fragments, such as printed dharani charms possibly from the 7th–8th centuries, indicate nascent use for apotropaic talismans, though archaeological evidence remains sparse due to paper's perishability. This printing surge reciprocally advanced papermaking by necessitating uniform, absorbent sheets, fostering a feedback loop where refined paper enabled clearer impressions and broader scalability. Tang innovations laid groundwork for Song dynasty expansions, but their empirical basis—rooted in trial-and-error carving and inking—prioritized fidelity to originals over innovation, preserving textual accuracy in an era of scholarly reverence for classics.

Medicine, Pharmacology, and Public Health

The Tang dynasty established the Imperial Medical Bureau (Taiyi Shu) in 624 CE under Emperor Taizong, marking the creation of the world's earliest formal with structured departments for administration, instruction, clinical care, and pharmacology. This institution implemented rigorous examinations for students and instructors, specialized training in fields such as , , and prescriptions, and extended education to local medical schools by 629 CE to train physicians across provinces. The bureau's framework emphasized empirical observation and systematic classification of diseases, drawing on prior Han and Sui traditions while integrating practical therapies for imperial and civilian needs. Prominent physician Sun Simiao (581–682 CE), often titled the "King of Medicine," authored the Beiji Qianjin Yaofang (Essential Prescriptions Worth a Thousand Gold for Emergencies) around 652 CE, a 30-volume synthesizing pre-Tang medical knowledge with 4,500 formulas for acute and chronic conditions. The text detailed diagnostics via , , and symptom analysis; therapeutic approaches including decoctions, , and ; and pediatric care, gynecology, and emergency interventions like wound suturing and toxin antidotes. Sun advocated ethical principles, such as impartial treatment regardless of , and introduced standardized "body inch" measurements for precise point location, enhancing reproducibility in clinical practice. His work prioritized preventive measures, like dietary regimens to balance and avoid seasonal epidemics, reflecting causal links between environmental factors and disease onset. In pharmacology, the Xin Xiu Bencao (Newly Revised ), compiled in 659 CE under imperial commission, cataloged 850 medicinal substances—plants, minerals, and animal products—with descriptions of properties, dosages, and 20 illustrations for identification, serving as the first state-sponsored pharmacopeia. This text classified drugs by therapeutic effects, such as tonics for vitality or purgatives for , and incorporated foreign imports like from Persia, expanding empirical testing of efficacy through clinical trials at the Imperial Medical Bureau. It laid groundwork for later compilations by verifying sources and correcting earlier errors in attribution, emphasizing verifiable outcomes over anecdotal claims. Public health efforts focused on institutional dissemination of knowledge rather than widespread isolation protocols, with the Imperial Medical Bureau coordinating responses to outbreaks through trained dispensaries and herbal stockpiles for famine- or flood-induced illnesses. 's prescriptions included formulas for plague-like symptoms, advocating and of affected households via monitoring, though relied on officials rather than centralized mandates. By fostering nationwide physician training, the dynasty reduced mortality from endemic diseases like and through accessible herbal prophylactics, though records indicate persistent challenges from warfare and migration.

Engineering: Canals, Roads, and Fortifications

The Tang dynasty relied heavily on an inherited network, primarily the Grand Canal system established under the preceding , for transporting grain tribute from southern agricultural regions to the northern capitals of and , enabling efficient supply of the capital's population exceeding one million. Engineering efforts during the Tang focused on repairs and modifications to combat and flooding, including the construction of the Wujiangtang levee, which separated the Jiangnan from the Wusong River and Lake Taihu, establishing it as an independent for enhanced navigation stability. These hydraulic works supported annual shipments of up to 100,000 tons of , underscoring the canals' role in sustaining imperial administration amid growing and military demands. Road infrastructure in the Tang emphasized rammed-earth construction for durability across varied terrain, with major highways often lined by low boundary walls and planted trees to provide shade and markers, facilitating overland and troop movements. The postal relay system (yízhàn) featured stations spaced approximately every 10 li (about 5 km) for imperial officials and 30 li for common travelers, equipped with , carts, and lodging to expedite communication and logistics across the empire's expanse. Frontier roads, including extensions of the into , were fortified with garrisons and beacons, supporting military campaigns and commerce that peaked during the dynasty's early expansion, with caravans carrying , spices, and over distances exceeding 6,000 km. Fortifications under the Tang prioritized defensive enclosures for urban centers and frontier outposts rather than continuous barriers, with the capital Chang'an's walls—originally from the Sui but reinforced during Tang—enclosing roughly 84 square kilometers in a rectangular layout measuring about 9.7 km east-west and 8.7 km north-south, featuring heights up to 5.5 meters and moats for added protection. In northern and western frontiers, engineering involved segmented walls, beacon towers, and fortresses such as those in the and , forming chains along trade routes to signal invasions and house garrisons against nomadic threats like the Türks, with structures built from tamped earth and stone to withstand sieges. These defenses, often integrated with natural barriers, reflected a strategy of mobile warfare supported by fixed points, enabling Tang control over vast protectorates until internal rebellions eroded maintenance by the mid-8th century.

Astronomy, Cartography, and Instrumentation

During the Tang dynasty, astronomical observations supported calendrical reforms and imperial divination, with systematic records of celestial events compiled in official annals. A notable artifact is the Dunhuang Star Atlas, a manuscript scroll discovered in the Mogao Caves, depicting over 1,300 stars across 13 charts visible from north-central China, organized by asterisms and constellations, and dated to the early 8th century or earlier. This atlas reflects Tang astronomers' detailed naked-eye mapping of the sky, dividing it into three enclosures (Purple Forbidden, Supreme Palace, and Heavenly Market) and 28 lunar mansions, aiding in timekeeping and prognostication. Monk (683–727), a Tang Buddhist scholar and mathematician, led advancements by conducting meridian measurements across provinces in 715–718 to refine geodetic data for astronomy and mapping. In collaboration with official Liang Lingzan, promulgated the Dayan Calendar in 728, incorporating precise observations of solar and lunar motions to correct discrepancies in the prior Wuyin Calendar, achieving an error of about 50 seconds per day through empirical adjustments rather than purely theoretical models. also designed a water-powered (shuiyun huntian yi), an equatorial instrument simulating celestial rotations via and clepsydra-driven , enabling automated tracking of stars and planets for extended observations without manual adjustment. Cartographic efforts integrated astronomical data with terrestrial surveys to depict the expanded Tang empire. Yi Xing's astrogeodetic project yielded meridian arcs essential for scaling maps accurately, linking latitude estimates to shadow lengths measured with gnomons at multiple sites. Chancellor Jia Dan (730–805) compiled the Hainei Huayi Tu ("Map of Chinese and Foreign Coasts Within the Seas"), a comprehensive spanning 9.1 by 10 meters on silk, incorporating routes to , , and beyond based on traveler reports and official itineraries, though the original does not survive. These maps emphasized administrative circuits (dao) and tribute paths, reflecting Tang's focus on territorial control and connectivity. Instrumentation emphasized precision in measurement, with armillary spheres evolving from static bronze models to dynamic ones. Tang craftsmen produced simplified armillaries (jingzhuo huntian yi) that prioritized equatorial rings for declination and readings, reducing complexity while maintaining observational fidelity for predictions and planetary positions. Gnomons and water clocks complemented these, standardizing time and angle via shadow projections calibrated against solstices, as evidenced in Yi Xing's meridian surveys that spanned over 2,000 kilometers north-south. Such tools underpinned Tang's empirical approach, prioritizing verifiable alignments over speculative cosmologies.

Foreign Relations and Cultural Exchange

Central Asian Protectorates and Wars

The Tang dynasty initiated its expansion into Central Asia under Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649), conquering the kingdom of Gaochang in 640 and establishing the Anxi Protectorate (Protectorate General to Pacify the West) to administer the Tarim Basin and its Tocharian-speaking populations. This protectorate, initially based in Turfan, extended control over key oases including Kucha, Khotan, Kashgar, and Karashahr through garrisons that secured Silk Road trade routes. Subsequent campaigns captured Karasahr in 644 and Kucha in 648, weakening Western Turkic influence in the region. Under Gaozong (r. 649–683), Tang forces completed the subjugation of the Western Turks through campaigns spanning 640 to 657, culminating in General Su Dingfang's decisive victory that dismantled the . The was reorganized with four garrisons in the to enforce tributary relations and suppress local revolts, facilitating economic exchange along the . In 702, during Xuanzong's reign (r. 712–756), the was founded north of the Tianshan Mountains to govern areas around present-day Jimsar, complementing Anxi by controlling northern routes and nomadic groups. Tang military efforts peaked with General 's campaigns, including victories over Tibetan forces and Karluk Turks, but faced setbacks against expanding powers. The in July 751 pitted a Tang army of approximately 10,000–30,000 under Gao Xianzhi against an Abbasid force led by Ziyad ibn Salih, reinforced by Karluk mercenaries who defected mid-battle, leading to a Tang rout with heavy casualties. Though not immediately decisive, this clash, combined with the (755–763) that diverted Tang resources, enabled Tibetan conquests of the protectorates by 763 and Uighur dominance, effectively ending direct Tang control over .

Relations with Korea, Japan, and Northeast Asia

The Tang dynasty pursued expansion into the Korean peninsula through alliances and conquests amid the period. In alliance with , Tang forces invaded Baekje in 660 CE, capturing its capital and leading to the kingdom's surrender after a decisive naval defeat at the . This joint campaign continued against , culminating in the fall of its capital in 668 CE following prolonged sieges and internal divisions within . Tang established the Protectorate to administer former territories, imposing direct control over northern Korea. Silla's ambitions for unification clashed with Tang suzerainty, sparking the Silla-Tang War from 670 to 676 CE. Silla, bolstered by remnants of Baekje and Goguryeo forces, launched offensives against Tang garrisons, exploiting Tang overextension elsewhere. By 676 CE, Tang withdrew its troops south of the , ceding de facto control of the peninsula to while retaining nominal tributary ties. This outcome preserved Silla's independence but integrated Korean elites into Tang cultural and administrative orbits through ongoing diplomacy. In , the multiethnic Bohai kingdom emerged in 698 CE under Dae Joyeong (Tae Choyŏng), a former general of Malgal descent, claiming succession to in and the Primorsky region. Bohai submitted tribute to Tang starting around 713 CE, offering furs, herbs, gems, and horses in exchange for silks, official titles, and recognition as a relative state, which Tang granted as a dukedom before elevating it to kingdom status by the 760s. These relations involved periodic military clashes but emphasized and cultural exchange, with Bohai adopting Tang bureaucratic models while asserting . Tang's recognition stabilized Bohai as a buffer against nomadic threats like the Khitans. Japan maintained largely peaceful, tributary-style relations with Tang, dispatching kentōshi (Tang envoys) missions approximately 19 times between 630 and 894 CE to foster learning and diplomacy. These expeditions, involving scholars, monks, and officials, traversed perilous sea routes to , returning with Tang legal codes, Confucian texts, Buddhist scriptures, and architectural techniques. The missions directly informed Japan's Taika Reforms of 645 CE, which centralized imperial authority, land taxation, and corvée labor along Tang lines, accelerating in governance and culture. Despite occasional tensions, such as Japan's aid to Baekje in 663 CE, interactions prioritized emulation over conflict, with Tang viewing Japan as a peripheral .

Southeast Asian Tributaries and Diplomacy

The Tang dynasty's diplomatic engagement with Southeast Asian polities primarily operated through the tributary system, under which regional kingdoms dispatched envoys to the imperial court at bearing gifts such as spices, aromatics, ivory, rhinoceros horns, tortoise shells, and amber, in exchange for Chinese silks, , official titles conferring legitimacy, and facilitated access. These missions, often led by princes or high officials, reinforced Tang perceptions of universal sovereignty while allowing Southeast Asian rulers to secure against rivals and economic advantages without direct subordination. Unlike direct protectorates in Central Asia, relations with Southeast Asia emphasized maritime connectivity, with envoys traveling via ports like Guangzhou, fostering incidental cultural exchanges such as Buddhist scholarship. Zhenla (Chenla), the Khmer polity succeeding in the region, maintained consistent tributary ties with the Tang from 623 to 813 CE, sending multiple missions including those from princes and a vice king, which the court acknowledged by bestowing honors and recording in official annals. These interactions, peaking under emperors like Taizong (r. 626–649) and Xuanzong (r. 712–756), involved tribute of local exotics like elephant tusks and resins, reflecting Zhenla's strategic interest in balancing relations amid internal divisions between "Water Chenla" and "Land Chenla." Diplomatic reciprocity was limited; Tang responses focused on symbolic rather than military intervention, though records note Zhenla's envoys seeking imperial mediation in succession disputes. Champa (Linyi in Chinese records), centered in central Vietnam, dispatched regular envoys to the Tang court, with at least four missions from the related Wendan kingdom documented during the dynasty's early centuries, trading forest products and marine goods for Chinese manufactures. These exchanges, often framed as deference to Tang suzerainty, helped Champa rulers legitimize their authority against Vietnamese Annamese pressures, as evidenced by imperial grants of titles like "." Maritime routes amplified commerce, but diplomacy occasionally strained due to Champa's raids on Annam, prompting Tang reprisals in the , such as the 758 expedition under , which extracted tribute pledges without . Srivijaya, the dominant maritime empire based in , initiated formal tributary relations with the Tang in the , leveraging its control of the Malacca Strait to supply aromatics and spices; a notable mission arrived in 902 CE, receiving honors from the last Tang emperor just before the dynasty's collapse. Earlier contacts included the 671 CE visit of the Chinese Yijing, who described Srivijaya's Buddhist hubs and trade networks, underscoring its role as an intermediary between and . Tang diplomacy granted Srivijayan kings prestigious designations, enhancing their regional hegemony, while mutual benefits extended to naval intelligence sharing against , though Tang envoys to Srivijaya were rare compared to inbound missions. Overall, these ties exemplified pragmatic , prioritizing economic flows over ideological uniformity.

Mutual Influences and Sinicization Processes

The Tang dynasty's cosmopolitan character facilitated mutual cultural influences, particularly along the , where n, Persian, and Indian elements integrated into Chinese society. Tang elites adopted foreign fashions such as leopard-skin hats and close-fitting sleeves, alongside recreational pursuits like and contests introduced from and Persia. Court entertainments incorporated tribute performers, including musicians and dancers, who popularized styles like the Sogdian whirling dance. These exchanges enriched Tang arts, with novel techniques in textiles, metalware, and ceramics derived from imported goods. Music and dance reflected this synthesis, as Emperor Xuanzong (r. 712–756) established the , training thousands in repertoires that blended indigenous and foreign instruments from . The focused on , integrating and exotic motifs, such as sleeve techniques inspired by Central Asian traditions, performed by male dancers at . , introduced via Sogdian intermediaries, became a favored imperial sport, symbolizing the era's openness to "barbarian" customs. Sinicization advanced through Tang expansion into Central Asia, exemplified by the Anxi Protectorate established in 640 to govern the Tarim Basin via Chinese garrisons and officials imposing Han administrative systems. Local elites assimilated, as seen in Khotan where rulers adopted sinicized names like Fushe Xin by the mid-8th century under protectorate oversight. In Turfan, a Han-majority kingdom under Qu family rule maintained sinicized governance and culture amid Tang influence. Eastward, Tang exerted cultural hegemony on Korea and , where states emulated Chang'an's urban layout, Confucian bureaucracy, writing systems, and sinicized Buddhist sects like Chan (Zen). Japanese missions, including Ennin's pilgrimage in 838, absorbed temple architecture and practices, while diplomatic marriages spread silk production and customs westward, as evidenced by 7th-century exchanges of silkworm technology. These processes balanced assimilation with reciprocal adoption, though Tang withdrawal post- (755–763) curtailed deeper Central Asian integration.

Historiography and Legacy

Official Tang Histories and Primary Sources

The (Jiu Tangshu), compiled between 941 and 945 under the Later Jin dynasty (936–947), represents the first official dynastic history of the Tang (618–907), organized into 200 juan encompassing basic annals, treatises, tables, and biographies. Directed by Liu Xu (888–947) with contributions from scholars like Zhang Zhao, it drew primarily from Tang-era records inherited by subsequent dynasties, including veritable records (shilu), edicts, and institutional compilations, though some materials were lost during the Tang's collapse and the Five Dynasties period (907–960). This work preserves detailed chronological accounts of reigns, administrative structures, and foreign relations, but its fidelity varies due to post-Tang editorial selections that prioritized Confucian moral framing over exhaustive documentation. The (Xin Tangshu), completed in 1060 under the Northern (960–1127) by chief editors (1007–1072) and Song Qi (998–1061), serves as a revised counterpart in 225 , reorganizing content for conciseness and incorporating additional sources such as stone inscriptions, private essays, and narratives absent or abbreviated in the Jiu Tangshu. It expands treatises on , economy, and rites while streamlining annals, reflecting Song-era preferences for analytical depth over verbatim reproduction, which sometimes introduces interpretive biases favoring rationalist governance models. Scholars consult both histories complementarily, as the Xin Tangshu rectifies certain factual errors in its predecessor—such as clarifications on foreign rulers—but omits some verbatim quotes and exhibits inconsistencies in biographical details due to selective sourcing. Underlying these official histories were Tang-period primary sources, notably the veritable records (shilu), which chronicled daily court events, imperial edicts, decrees, and rituals in annalistic format, compiled by Historiography Office officials immediately after each emperor's death. For instance, the Gaozong shilu (for Emperor Gaozong, r. 649–683) spanned 500 chapters upon completion in 1202, though most Tang shilu survive only fragmentarily through incorporation into later compilations like the Zizhi Tongjian (1084). These records prioritized factual logging over narrative embellishment, providing raw data on policies, military campaigns, and appointments, but were subject to contemporary censorship to protect imperial prestige. Additional primary materials include inscriptions and epitaphs (muzhi), which offer contemporaneous, non-court accounts of officials' careers, land holdings, and local events, often preserved archaeologically and less prone to central revisionism than shilu. Excavated documents from sites like and Tang tombs corroborate official narratives with administrative ledgers, legal codes, and private correspondence, revealing discrepancies such as understated fiscal strains or exaggerated military successes in historiographical texts. The Tang Huiyao (1013), a Song-era institutional digest, further compiles Tang statutes and precedents directly from archival originals, supplementing the dynastic histories with procedural details omitted in biographical sections. Together, these sources enable verification of official accounts, highlighting how post-Tang compilers balanced empirical records with ideological reconstruction.

Traditional Chinese Evaluations

In traditional , the Tang dynasty (618–907) was frequently lauded for its early achievements in governance and expansion, particularly under Emperor Taizong (r. 626–649), whose reign—known as the Zhenguan era—was idealized as a model of benevolent rule emphasizing frugality, merit-based appointments, and Confucian virtue, drawing from precedents like the . (1019–1086), in his comprehensive chronicle (completed 1084), devoted extensive sections to the Tang, portraying this period as a cautionary exemplar where initial prosperity stemmed from centralized authority and agricultural reforms but eroded due to imperial indulgence and favoritism toward non-Han generals, culminating in the (755–763) that halved the empire's population and territory. Song dynasty compilers of the official histories, such as the Jiu Tangshu (Old Book of Tang, completed 945) and Xin Tangshu (New Book of Tang, completed 1060 under Ouyang Xiu and Song Qi), systematically documented Tang's fiscal innovations—like the equal-field system supporting over 80 million registered households by mid-eighth century—and cultural patronage, including the compilation of encyclopedias and poetry anthologies, yet critiqued its decline as self-inflicted through eunuch interference, excessive taxation post-rebellion (reaching 20% of harvest yields), and overreliance on Buddhist institutions that diverted state revenues estimated at millions of strings of cash annually. Ouyang Xiu, emphasizing evidentiary rigor over anecdotal or supernatural elements, restructured biographical sections to include marginalized figures like rebels and traitors, reflecting a Song-era Confucian bias toward moral causality in historical causation, wherein Tang's cosmopolitanism—evident in employing Turkic and Sogdian officials—was faulted for diluting Han-centric loyalty and enabling factionalism. Later traditional evaluations, influenced by Neo-Confucian thinkers like (1130–1200), further diminished Tang's prestige relative to the by highlighting its aristocratic remnants and military adventurism—such as campaigns extending to the and Korea—as precursors to dynastic exhaustion, contrasting with Song's scholarly introspection and examination refinements that produced over 30,000 degree-holders annually by the . This perspective underscored Tang's legacy as a warning against imperial overextension, with explicitly advising rulers to emulate Taizong's consultations with ministers like (580–643), who remonstrated against 200 excesses, rather than later emperors' detachment that invited 17 major rebellions after 763. Overall, while acknowledging Tang's economic peak—with output and Grand Canal facilitating a GDP rivaling Europe's medieval highs—historians attributed its 289-year span to early institutional strengths undone by causal lapses in elite selection and fiscal prudence, informing subsequent dynasties' centralizing reforms.

Western and Modern Scholarly Debates

Western scholars, following the foundational work of historians like and later Denis Twitchett, have generally portrayed the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE) as a pinnacle of Chinese imperial achievement, characterized by territorial expansion, economic vitality, and cultural efflorescence, yet debates persist over the causal factors behind its prosperity and eventual fragmentation. Twitchett's multi-volume History of China emphasizes the dynasty's administrative innovations, such as the for land allocation and taxation, which supported a estimated at around 50–80 million by the mid-8th century, enabling fiscal surpluses that funded military campaigns and urban development in . However, scholars like Mark Edward Lewis argue that this era's "cosmopolitan empire" integrated diverse ethnic groups—Sogdians, Turks, and others—into the bureaucracy and military, with non-Han ancestry evident among elites, challenging earlier Sinocentric narratives that downplayed foreign influences. A central contention revolves around the dynasty's , traditionally viewed as peaking under Xuanzong (r. 712–756 CE) before declining into isolationism after the (755–763 CE), which killed millions and halved the treasury. This interpretation, advanced by E.G. Pulleyblank, attributes post-rebellion xenophobia to fiscal strain and military setbacks, evidenced by policies restricting foreign traders and reducing Central Asian garrisons. Contrasting this, recent analyses by T.H. Barrett and others advocate a holistic view, positing that multicultural exchanges persisted into the late Tang, as seen in continued Buddhist translations from and Persian mercantile networks in , where Arab and Persian communities thrived despite edicts like the 845 CE Huichang targeting foreign religions. These scholars critique the decline narrative as overly reliant on court-centric sources like the Old Tang Book (Jiu Tangshu), which reflect Confucian biases against "" elements, urging integration of archaeological data from sites like showing sustained traffic. Debates on Tang decline further highlight tensions between structural analyses and contingency. Jonathan Karam Skaff posits that decentralized military commands () empowered regional warlords, eroding central authority after 763 CE, with tax revenues dropping by 70–80% due to devastation and hoarding. In contrast, historians like Hartman emphasize contingent events, such as interference in succession—culminating in Emperor Xizong's (r. 873–888 CE) flight from Huang Chao's uprising (875–884 CE)—over inherent flaws, noting that pre-rebellion metrics like grain storage exceeding 1 million shi annually indicated resilience absent leadership failures. Modern reassessments, informed by quantitative studies of Tang fiscal records, question inflated prosperity claims, revealing that while kaoshi (corvée labor) burdens were mitigated by cash payments, unequal enforcement exacerbated peasant revolts, as quantified in G. Pulleyblank's examinations of rebel manifests demanding land redistribution. Gender and rulership evaluations, particularly of (r. 690–705 CE as emperor), underscore ideological divides. Traditional Western accounts, echoing Sima Guang's , depict her as a ruthless consolidator who weakened the Li clan through purges, yet feminist-influenced scholars like N. Harry Rothschild argue her Buddhist patronage and legal reforms stabilized the realm post-Sui chaos, with edicts like the 694 CE Yonghui Code promoting over heredity. Critiques from sinologists like David Graff highlight unverifiable hagiographic elements in her biographies, attributing dynasty longevity more to Taizong's (r. 626–649 CE) institutional legacies than her interregnum, which disrupted but did not derail administrative continuity. These debates reflect broader methodological shifts, with quantitative challenging qualitative narratives derived from literati sources biased toward moralistic interpretations over empirical causation.

Recent Archaeology and Empirical Reassessments

Excavations in Province uncovered a Tang-era from the AD, featuring well-preserved murals depicting daily life, including servants, banquets, and a figure interpreted as a blond foreigner, suggesting significant cultural exchange along the . Similar murals from another northern illustrate routine activities like cooking and , providing empirical visual evidence of urban and rural Tang social structures beyond textual accounts. Epitaphs from the Dong family cemetery in Province, unearthed in recent digs, reveal details on Tang political decisions, including Xuanzong's (r. 712–756 AD) administrative choices, offering corroboration or challenges to official histories like the Old Tang Book. of Go pieces from the Lafuqueke Cemetery in indicates that materials originated from the near , implying extensive raw material trade networks across the empire's western frontiers during the 7th–9th centuries AD. Archaeological work at 's eastern markets has yielded foreign artifacts, such as Persian-style glassware, affirming the city's role as a hub for international commerce and contradicting underestimations in some traditional sources of Tang economic scale. Osteoarchaeological studies of animal remains from the Xiajiazhuang residential site near document diverse livestock consumption, supporting reassessments of urban food economies as more varied and self-sufficient than previously inferred from fiscal records. Empirical genetic analyses of skeletons from the Fudamen cemetery in Province detect East-West admixture in Tang populations, indicating greater integration of Central Asian (Hu) descendants than suggested by elite-focused histories, thus revising views of Tang society's ethnic insularity. compilations further demonstrate elevated , with commoners ascending to official roles, challenging assumptions of rigid Confucian hierarchies and aligning with merit-based examination system data from the period. These findings, grounded in multidisciplinary approaches including synchrotron imaging of pigments and vessels, underscore archaeology's role in validating Tang cosmopolitanism while tempering narrative biases in dynastic annals toward imperial grandeur.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.